UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
2019
prosper-20191231_g1.jpg
Commission
File Number
Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter,
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation,
Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code
and Telephone Number (Including Area Code)
I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
Number
333-179941-01 333-204880 333-225797-01
333-147019
333-179941-01
333-204880
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
a Delaware corporation
221 Main Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415)593-5400
73-1733867
333-179941
333-204880-01
333-225797
PROSPER FUNDING LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
221 Main Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415)593-5479

45-4526070
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Commission File NumberExact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code
Registrant's Telephone Number (Including Area Code)
I.R.S. Employer Identification Number

Registrant
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Title of Each ClassTrading SymbolName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.NoneNoneNone
Prosper Funding LLCNoneNone
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
RegistrantTitle of Each Class
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.NoneNoneNone
Prosper Funding LLCNoneNoneNone
Indicate by check mark if each registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ¨ No ý
Yes ¨ No ý
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes ¨ No ý
   Prosper Funding LLC
Yes ¨ No ý
Indicate by check mark if each registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ¨ No ý
Yes ¨ No ý
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes ¨ No ý
   Prosper Funding LLC
Yes ¨ No ý
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No ¨
Yes ý No ¨
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes ý No ¨
   Prosper Funding LLC
Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ý No ¨
Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K (applicable to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. only). ¨
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes ý No ¨
   Prosper Funding LLC
Yes ý No ¨








Indicate by check mark whether theeach registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
 Accelerated
 Filer
Accelerated
 Filer
Non-Accelerated
Non-accelerated Filer
Smaller
 Reporting
 Company
Emerging Growth Company
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.¨¨ýx¨
Prosper Funding LLC¨¨
ýx
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if each registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.¨

   Prosper Funding LLC¨
Indicate by check mark whether theeach registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No ý
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
  Yes ☐No ý
   Prosper Funding LLC
  Yes No ý
Yes ¨ No ý
Prosper Funding LLC meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a), and (b) and (d) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.
RegistrantAggregate Market Value of Voting and Non-Voting Common Equity Held by Non-Affiliates of the Registrant at June 30, 2016
Number of Shares of
Common Stock of the
Registrant
Outstanding at
March 5, 2018
June 30, 2019March 15, 2020
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.(a)(a)
70,313,915
68,455,641 
($.010.01 par value)
Prosper Funding LLC(a)(b)NoneNaNne
(a) Not applicable
(a)Not applicable.
(b)All voting and non-voting common equity is owned by Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
THIS COMBINED FORM 10-K IS SEPARATELY FILED BY PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC. AND PROSPER FUNDING LLC. INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN RELATING TO ANY INDIVIDUAL REGISTRANT IS FILED BY SUCH REGISTRANT ON ITS OWN BEHALF. EACH REGISTRANT MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS TO INFORMATION RELATING TO THE OTHER REGISTRANT.



2




TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEMPage
PART I
ITEM 1
ITEM 1A
ITEM 1B
ITEM 2
ITEM 3
ITEM 4
ITEMPART IIPage
PART IITEM 5
ITEM 1
ITEM 1A
ITEM 1B
ITEM 2
ITEM 3
ITEM 4
PART II
ITEM 5
ITEM 6
ITEM 7
ITEM 7A
ITEM 8
ITEM 9
ITEM 9A
ITEM 9B
PART III
ITEM 10
ITEM 11
ITEM 12
ITEM 13
ITEM 14
PART IV
ITEM 15
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
XBRL Content



3




Except as the context requires otherwise, as used herein, “Registrants” refers to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”), a Delaware corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Prosper Funding LLC (“PFL”), a Delaware limited liability company; “we,” “us,” “our,” “Prosper,” and the “Company” refer to PMI and its wholly owned subsidiaries, PFL, BillGuard, Inc. (“BillGuard”), a Delaware corporation, Prosper Capital Management LLC (“PCM”), a Delaware limited liability company, and Prosper Healthcare Lending LLC (“PHL”), a Delaware limited liability company, Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”), a Delaware statutory trust, Prosper Warehouse II Trust (“PWIIT”), a Delaware statutory trust, Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-1 (“PMIT 2019-1”), a Delaware statutory trust, Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-2 (“PMIT 2019-2”), a Delaware statutory trust and Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-4 (“PMIT 2019-4”), a Delaware statutory trust, on a consolidated basis; and “Prosper Funding” refers to PFL and its wholly owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a Delaware limited liability company, and Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis. PAH was dissolved on November 28, 2018. As a result, references to Prosper Funding do not include PAH for periods subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2018. In addition, the unsecured, consumer loans originated through our marketplace are referred to as “Borrower Loans,” and the borrower payment dependent notes issued through our marketplace, whether issued by PMI or PFL, are referred to as “Notes.” Investors currently invest in Borrower Loans through two channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on the payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows accredited and institutional investors to purchase Borrower Loans in their entirety directly from PFL. The Notes available to Note Channel investors are distinguishable from notes held by certain third party investors pursuant to Prosper’s securitization transactions, which are referred to herein as “Notes Issued by Securitization Trust.” Finally, although historically we havethe Company has referred to investors as “lender members,” we callPFL calls them “investors” herein to avoid confusion since WebBank is the lender for Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace.  All share and per share numbers presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been adjusted to reflect a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016.
The following filings are available for download free of charge at www.prosper.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such filings are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports. Further, a copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is located at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our SEC filings are also available to the public at the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. The information posted on our website and blog is not incorporated herein by reference and is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts, and can generally be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “continue” or similar expressions. These statements may appear throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the sections titled “Business,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements inherently involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in these statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, PMI or PFL expresses an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of our respective managements, is expressed in good faith, and is believed to have a reasonable basis. Nevertheless, wemanagement can give no assurances that any of the events anticipated by these forward-looking statements will occur or, if any of them does occur, what impact they will have on Prosper or Prosper Funding’s results of operations and financial condition.
There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements, including, among other things:
the performance of the Notes, which, in addition to being speculative investments, are special, limited obligations that are not guaranteed or insured;
PFL’s ability to make payments on the Notes, including in the event that borrowers fail to make payments on the corresponding Borrower Loans;
our ability to attract potential borrowers and investors to our marketplace;
the reliability of the information about borrowers that is supplied by borrowers including actions by some borrowers to defraud investors;
our ability to service the Borrower Loans, and our ability or the ability of a third party debt collector to pursue collection against any borrower, including in the event of fraud or identity theft;
credit risks posed by the credit worthiness of borrowers and the effectiveness of our credit rating systems;


potential efforts by state regulators or litigants to impose liability that could affect PFL’s (or any subsequent assignee’s) ability to continue to charge to borrowers the interest rates that they agreed to pay at origination of their loans;
the impact of future economic conditions on the performance of the Notes and the loss rates for the Notes;
4




our compliance with applicable local, state and federal law, including the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and other laws;
our compliance with applicable regulations and regulatory developments or court decisions affecting our business;
potential efforts by state regulators or litigants to characterize PFL or PMI, rather than WebBank, as the lender of the loans originated through our marketplace;
the application of federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws to borrowers and to PFL and PMI;
the impact of borrower delinquencies, defaults and prepayments on the returns on the Notes;
the lack of a public trading market for the Notes and the current lack of any trading platform on which investors can resell the Notes;
the federal income tax treatment of an investment in the Notes and the PMI Management Rights;
our ability to prevent security breaches, disruptions in service, and comparable events that could compromise the personal and confidential information held on our data systems, reduce the attractiveness of the platform or adversely impact our ability to service Borrower Loans; and
the other risks discussed under the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  
There may also be other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. You should carefully read the factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause PMI or PFL’s actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements included in this report speak only as of the date hereof and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. PMI and PFL undertake no obligation to update or revise such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.



5




PART I
Item 1.Business
Item 1.  Business
Overview
Prosper is a pioneer of online marketplace lending.lending that connects borrowers and investors. Our goal is to enable borrowers to access credit at affordable rates and provide investors with attractive risk-adjusted rates of return. Our marketplace facilitated $2.9$2.7 billion in Borrower Loan originations during 20172019 and $11.2$16.7 billion in Borrower Loan originations since it first launched in 2006.
We believe our online marketplace model has key advantages relative to traditional bank lending,banks, including (i) an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects qualified supply and demand of capital, (ii) online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience, and (iii) data and technology driven automation that increases efficiency, and improves the borrower and investor experience.experience through increased efficiency. We do not operate physical branches or incur expenses related to that infrastructure;infrastructure like traditional banks or consumer finance institutions do; instead, we use data and technology to drive automation and efficiency in our operations. As part of operating our marketplace, we verify the identity of borrowers and assess borrowers’ credit risk profile using a combination of public and proprietary data. Our proprietary technology automates several loan origination and servicing functions, including the borrower application process, data gathering, underwriting, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection.
WeTo consumer borrowers, we believe that we offer many consumers access togenerally better pricing, on average, than the pricing that theythose borrowers would pay on outstanding credit card balances or unsecured installment loans from a traditional bank or finance company. We also believe that we offer faster decisions and loan originations, and greater transparency, resulting in a better customer experience than that provided by traditional consumer finance institutions.lenders.
To individual and institutional investors, we offer an asset class that we believe has attractive risk adjusted returns, transparency, access to consumer loans, and lowlower duration risk.
Our marketplace offers fixed rate, fully amortizing, unsecured consumer loans ranging from $2,000 to $35,000$40,000 with no prepayment penalty. Loan terms of three and five years are available, depending upon the rating assigned to the borrower at issuance and loan amount being sought. All Borrower Loans are originated and funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank organized under the laws of Utah. WebBank retains certain loans, which are not available for investment through the marketplace. After origination, WebBank sells the Borrower Loans to PFL, which either holds them or sells them to accredited institutional investors.
Investors invest in Borrower Loans through two channels – (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on PFL’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows accredited institutional investors to purchase a Borrower Loan in its entirety directly from PFL. PFL continues to own the Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel. Prosper services all of the Borrower Loans made through the marketplace.
Company Background and History
PMI was incorporated in the state of Delaware on March 22, 2005. PFL was formed as a limited liability company in the state of Delaware on February 17, 2012, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PMI.
PMI developed our marketplace and, until February 1, 2013, owned the proprietary technology that makes operation of our marketplace possible. On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred the marketplace to PFL. PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended (i) to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or similar proceeding, and (ii) to minimize the likelihood that, in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, PFL would be substantively consolidated with PMI and thus have its assets subjected to claims of PMI’s creditors. We believe we have achieved this by imposing through PFL’s organizational documents and covenants in the Amended and Restated Indenture (as defined below in “Item 13. CertainItem 13, “Certain Relationships and relatedRelated Transactions, and Director Independence”) certain restrictions on PFL’s activities and certain formalities designed to reinforce PFL’s status as a distinct entity from PMI. In addition, under the Administration Agreement, dated February 1, 2013, between PMI and PFL (as amended to date, the “Administration Agreement”), PMI has agreed, in its dealings with PFL and with third parties, to observe certain “separateness covenants” related to its corporate formalities.


PMI has also adopted resolutions limiting its own activities and interactions with PFL in order to further reduce the likelihood that PFL would be substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy.  
PFL has retained PMI, pursuant to the Administration Agreement, to provide certain administrative services relating to our marketplace. Specifically, the Administration Agreement contains a license granted by PFL to PMI that entitles PMI to use the marketplace for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and noteNote servicing, and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance
6




of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding. The license is terminable in whole or in part upon the failure by PMI to pay PFL the licensing fee, or upon PMI’s termination as the provider of some or all of the aforementioned services. See “Item 13. CertainItem 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.—Agreements with PFL” for more information.
How our Marketplace Works
Our marketplace is an online marketplace that matches individuals who wish to obtain unsecured consumer loans with individuals and institutions who are willing to commit funds to those loans. A borrower who wishes to obtain a loan through our marketplace must apply and, if accepted, post a loan listing to our marketplace. Each time we post a group of listings on our marketplace, we determine the relative proportions of such listings that will be allocated to the Note Channel and the Whole Loan Channel, respectively, based on our estimate of the relative overall demand in each channel. We then use a random allocation methodology to allocate individual listings between the two channels based on those proportions. If a listing receives enough investor commitments, WebBank will originate the Borrower Loan requested and then sell it to PFL.  
Borrowers
Any natural person at least 18 years of age who is a U.S. resident in a state where loans through our marketplace are available with a U.S. bank account and a social security number may apply to become a borrower. All potential borrowers are subject to anti-fraud, anti-terrorism and identity verification processes and a potential borrower cannot obtain a loan without passing those processes.
When a borrower requests a loan, we first evaluate whether the borrower meets the underwriting criteria required by WebBank. The underwriting criteria apply to all loans originated through our marketplace and may not be changed without WebBank's consent. AllFor the Note Channel, all borrowers who request a loan are subject to the following minimum eligibility criteria: (1) have at least a 640 creditFICO score, (2) have fewer than five credit bureau inquiries (after excluding duplicate inquiries) within the last 6 months, (3) have an annual income greater than $0, (4) have a debt-to-income ratio belowof no more than 50%, (5) have at least three open trades reported on their credit report, and (6) have not filed for bankruptcy within the last 12 months. Borrowers
Prosper also allows two borrowers to apply together as joint applicants for a co-borrower loan. Each borrower applicant is held jointly and severally liable for the obligations under the loan. In the case of co-borrower loans, the primary (or “specified”) borrower must satisfy the above credit criteria (except the debt-to-income ratio for joint loans is calculated using the combined debt-to-income ratio of the primary and secondary borrowers without duplication of combined debt). The secondary borrower must also satisfy certain additional credit criteria, including a minimum FICO score of at least 600, at least one open trade reported on the secondary borrower’s credit report, and no bankruptcy filings within the last 12 months.
In addition, a borrower may have up to two loans through Prosper outstanding at one time, provided that (1) the first loan is current, (2) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of both loans does not exceed the then-current maximum allowable loan amount for loans (currently $35,000)$40,000), and (3) the borrower complies with the prior-borrower constraints above.
From time to time, we have, with WebBank’s consent, tested new products that include features which are outside the standard eligibility criteria discussed above. These products are available on a limited basis, exclusively through our Whole Loan Channel and did not have a material impact on our business or our financial statements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019.    
Investors
Investors are individuals and institutions that have the opportunity to buy Notes or Borrower Loans. An individual investor must be a natural person at least 18 years of age and a U.S. resident, must provide his or her social security number, and may be required to provide his or her state driver’s license or state identification card number. An institutional investor must provide its taxpayer identification number and entity formation documentation. All potential investors are subject to anti-fraud, anti-terrorism and identity verification processes and a potential investor cannot invest in Notes or Borrower Loans without passing those processes.  
At the time an individual investor registers to participate in the Note Channel, such investor must satisfy any minimum financial suitability standards established for the Note Channel by the state in which the investor resides. Investors who participate in the Note Channel must enter into an investor registration agreement, which agreement governs all sales of Notes to such investors.


Only investors thatwho are approved by us are eligible to participate in the Whole Loan Channel. At a minimum, to participate in the Whole Loan Channel, an investor must meet the definition of an “accredited investor” set forth in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933.Act. Investors who participate in the Whole Loan Channel must enter into loan purchase and loan servicing agreements with us. 
7




Relationship with WebBank
WebBank is an FDIC-insured, Utah-chartered industrial bank that originates all Borrower Loans made through our marketplace. WebBank and PMI are parties to an agreement under which PMI manages the operations of our marketplace that relate to the submission of loan applications by borrowers and the making of related Borrower Loans by WebBank in exchange for a fee. WebBank makes each Borrower Loan with its own funds. A joint WebBank-Prosper Credit Policy, which can be changed only with WebBank’s approval, constitutes the policy Prosper must follow in reviewing, approving and administering Borrower Loans made by WebBank through the marketplace. WebBank, PMI and PFL are parties to a Loan Sale Agreement, under which WebBank sells and assigns the promissory notes evidencing the Borrower Loans to PFL. As consideration for WebBank's agreement to sell and assign the promissory notes, PFL pays WebBank the purchase price of the promissory notes, as well as a monthly fee, which is partially tied to the terms and performance of the loans. PMI receives payments from WebBank as compensation for the activities it undertakes on WebBank's behalf.
Risk Management
Each loan listing is assigned a Prosper Rating, which is a letter grade that indicates the expected level of risk associated with the listing. Each letter grade corresponds to an estimated average gross annualized loss rate range. The Prosper Rating associated with a loan listing reflects the loss expectations for that listing as of the time the rating is given. This means that otherwise similar borrowers may have different Prosper Ratings at different points in time as the Prosper Rating is updated to incorporate more recent information.
The estimated average annualized loss rate for each loan listing is based primarily on the historical performance of Borrower Loans with similar characteristics and is primarily determined by two scores: (i) a custom Prosper Score, and (ii) a credit score obtained from a credit reporting agency. The custom Prosper Score is updated periodically to include new information that is predictive of borrower risk as such information becomes available or as the evidence supporting a particular datum becomes strong enough to merit its inclusion in the custom Prosper Score.
The Prosper Score predicts the probability of a Borrower Loan going “bad,” where “bad” is defined as going more than 60 days past due within twelve months of the application date. To create the Prosper Score, we have developed and refined a custom risk model using our historical data as well as a data archive from a consumer credit bureau. We built the model on our borrower population, and included as variables information provided directly by the borrowers as well as included in their credit reports, so that the model would incorporate behavior that is unique to that population. In addition to the Prosper Score, another major element used to determine the Prosper Rating for a loan listing is a credit score from a consumer reporting agency. We currently use either or both of TransUnion’s FICO08 score.score and VantageScore. We obtain a borrower’s credit score at the time the loan listing is created, unless we already have a credit score on file that is not more than thirty days old.
Sale of Notes and Borrower Loans
If an investor successfully bids on a loan listing, the principal amount of the loan will be set aside in the investor’s account and may not be used for other bids. In the event a listing does not result in a loan being originated, the funds are made available for bidding by the investor.
For loan listings allocated to the Note Channel, a bid on a listing is an investor’s commitment to purchase a Note from PFL. PFL generally issues and sells a series of Notes for each Borrower Loan that is originated through the Note Channel. The Notes are sold to the investors who successfully bid on the corresponding loan listing in the principal amounts of their respective bids. Each series of Notes is dependent for payment on PFL’s receipt of payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan. PFL uses the proceeds of each series of Notes to purchase the corresponding Borrower Loan from WebBank on the second business day after WebBank has originated the Borrower Loan. Each Note comes attached with an inseparable PMI Management Right issued by PMI. Each PMI Management Right constitutes an "investment contract," a concept under federal securities law that refers to an arrangement where investors invest money in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits, primarily from the efforts of others.
For listings allocated to the Whole Loan Channel, a bid on a listing is an investor’s commitment to purchase the Borrower Loan from PFL after origination by WebBank and sale to PFL. On the second business day after WebBank has originated


the Borrower Loan, PFL purchases the Borrower Loan from WebBank and re-sells the Borrower Loan that same day to the corresponding investor. PFL records the investor as the owner of the Borrower Loan.
Loan Servicing and Collection
We are responsible for servicing the Borrower Loans made through our marketplace. We will pay each Note holder principal and interest on the Note in an amount equal to each such Note’s pro-rata portion of the principal and interest payments, if any, which we receive on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee. We will also pay Note holders their pro ratapro-rata portion of any other amounts we receive on the corresponding Borrower Loans, including late fees and prepayments, subject to our servicing fee; provided, that we will not pay Note holders any non-sufficient funds fees we receive
8




for failed borrower payments. In addition, the funds available for payment on the Notes will be reduced by the amount of any attorneys’ fees or collection fees we, a third-party servicer or a collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts related to the corresponding Borrower Loan. NoWe will have no further obligation to make payments will be made on any Note after its final maturity date.
We will pay each investor thatwho has purchased a Borrower Loan through the Whole Loan Channel principal and interest on the Borrower Loan purchased in an amount equal to the principal and interest payments, if any, that we receive, net of our servicing fee. We will also pay these investors any other amounts we receive on the Borrower Loans, including late fees and prepayments, subject to our servicing fee, provided that we will not pay these investors any non-sufficient funds fees we receive for failed borrower payments or any payment processing fees we may collect. In addition, the funds available for payment on the Borrower Loans will be reduced by the amount of any attorneys' fees or collection fees we, a third-party servicer or a collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts related to the Borrower Loan.
If a Borrower Loan becomes past due, we may collect on it directly or refer it to a third-party collection agency. Our in-house collections department and third-party collection agencies are compensated by keeping a portion of the payments they collect based on a predetermined schedule.  
Customers
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding commitments for a large percentage of all listings that result in Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the largest party purchased a total of 70%9.4% of those loans.
Industry Background and Trends
According to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as of December 2017,2019, the balance of outstanding consumer credit (excluding mortgages) in the United States totaled $3.8$4.2 trillion. This amount included $1.0$1.1 trillion of revolving consumer credit, which many consumers seek to refinance for a lower interest rate.
The market for consumer lending is competitive and rapidly evolving, and there is an opportunity for the online marketplace model to transform the traditional lending process. We believe our marketplace offers a superior solution for both borrowers and investors.
For borrowers, we believe our marketplace offers the following principal competitive factors: better pricing versus other alternatives; a simple, easy and intuitive customer experience; a fast and efficient process; and trust and transparency.
For investors, we believe our marketplace offers the following principal competitive factors: attractive risk adjusted returns; low duration risk; diversification from other asset classes; a simple, easy and intuitive customer experience; and trust and transparency.
Competition
We compete for borrowers and investors against other financial products and companies. For borrowers, our competition includes banking institutions, credit unions, credit card issuers and other consumer finance companies. For investors, our competition includes other investment vehicles such as consumer lending funds and asset classes such as equities, bonds and commodities. Our competition for borrowers and investors also includes other online consumer lending companies, such as


LendingClub Corporation, Social Finance Inc. and other marketplace lending platforms. We may also face potential competition from new market entrants, or business expansion from established companies, likesuch as Goldman Sachs. These companies may have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their offerings. 
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe the following strengths differentiate us from our competitors and provide us with sustainable competitive advantages:
Leading Online Marketplace:. Since inception, our marketplace has facilitated $11.2$16.7 billion in loan originations, of which $2.9$2.7 billion was for the year-ended December 31, 2017.2019. As our business grows, our brand, reputation and scale strengthens. This allows us to attract top talent, speed up product innovation, attract market place participants and drive down our cost structure, all of which further benefit borrowers and investors.
Robust Network Effect:Effect.The attractiveness of our marketplace increases as the number of participants on our marketplace increases, yielding a classic network effect. Our marketplace offers consumer borrowers access to affordable credit, and allows individual and institutional investors to invest in an asset class with attractive risk-adjusted returns. The diversity of investors brings scale and breadth of funding to our marketplace and makes credit more affordable. As both sides of the equation grow, the advantages (reduced risk, lower cost) scale accordingly,
9




attracting even more borrowers and investors. The increased participant pool reduces costs and generates more data which we use to improve the effectiveness of our credit decisioning and scoring models. This enhances our aggregate loan performance and builds increased trust in our marketplace, which in turn attracts more borrowers and investors.
Technology Platform:Platform. Our technology platform automates key aspects of our operations, including the borrower application process, data gathering, underwriting, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection. This provides a significant time and cost advantage over traditional consumer lending business models and, we believe, enables us to provide a superior user experience to our borrowers and investors. Using our accumulated performance data, we continually invest in incremental improvements in our algorithms thus extending our technological advantage.
Proprietary Risk Management Capabilities:Capabilities.We have developed a proprietary risk model based on consumer loan performance data, which we believe allows us to accurately assess the credit risk profile of borrowers and which we believe also allows investors to earn attractive risk adjusted returns. We leverage the results from our growing data stream to continually refine this risk model and more accurately predict loan performance.
Unique Corporate Structure: Structure.Our corporate structure was designed to offer our investors extra protection. The organization and operation of PFL and PMI as separate and distinct entities should serve to protect our Note investors in the event of a bankruptcy filing by or against PMI.  This organizational structure, along with the federal and state registration process, is expensive and time consuming to undertake, and is not easily duplicated by competitors.
Efficient and Attractive Financial Model:Model. We have multiple revenue streams and an efficient cost model. We generate revenue from transaction fees from our marketplace’s role in matching borrowers with investors to enable loan originations, as well as from servicing fees related to Borrower Loans for which we retain the servicing rights.rights, net interest income from Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, credit referral fees and other ancillary revenue sources. Additionally, our technology platform significantly reduces the need for physical infrastructure and therefore allows our business to grow with a lower cost operating model, providing us with significant operating leverage.
Sources of Revenues


We have twothree primary sources of revenues: transaction fees, servicing fees, and servicing fees.net interest income. Prosper earns transaction fees from WebBank by facilitating the origination of Borrower Loans through the marketplace. Prosper earns servicing fees from investors for processing principal and interest payments made by borrowers and passing such payments on to investors.investors and also earns net interest income from Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing efforts are designed to attract individuals and institutions to our marketplace, encourage their enrollment and participation as users, and facilitate and enhance their understanding and utilization of the services for borrowing or investing. We employ a wide range of marketing channels to reach potential customers and build our brand and value proposition. These channels include referrals, online marketing, direct mail, partner and affiliate introductions, emails, and public media.email. We are constantly seeking new methods to reach more potential members, while testing and optimizing the end to end customer experience.
Origination and Servicing
We have efficient and scalable systems for credit risk assessment, loan underwriting, and servicing. Our risk model takes borrowers’ supplied information and combines that information with public and proprietary data to make real time decisions. Our verification agents use automated tools to confirm credit eligibility. Our loan servicing platform calculates a loan’s amortization and processes payments received from borrowers and passes such payments on to investors.  In addition, we have a back-up servicing agreement with First Associates Loan Servicing, LLC (“First Associates”), a loan servicing company that is willing and able to assume servicing responsibilities in the event that we are no longer able to service the Borrower Loans and Notes. First Associates is a financial services company that has entered into numerous successor loan servicing agreements.
Technology
We have made substantial investment in our customer acquisition capability, customer experience, and credit underwriting, loan servicing and payment systems. Our marketplace utilizes proprietary software to process electronic cash movements, record book entries and calculate cash balances in users’ funding accounts. Electronic deposits and payments are mostly done via Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) transactions. The technology platform allows us to economically acquire and service Borrower Loans and Notes, and allows WebBank to efficiently originate and fund Borrower Loans.
The system hardware for our marketplace is located in hosting facilities in Scottsdale, Arizona, and Las Vegas, Nevada.Nevada, The Dalles, Oregon and Council Bluffs, Iowa. We own all of the hardware deployed in support of our marketplace. We continuously
10




monitor the performance and availability of our marketplace. The infrastructure is scalable and utilizes standard techniques such as load-balancing and redundancies.
Key aspects of our technology include:
Scalability: Scalability.Our marketplace is designed and built as a highly scalable, multi-tier, redundant system. It incorporates technologies designed to prevent any single point of failure within the data center from taking the entire system offline. This is achieved by utilizing load-balancing technologies at the front end and business layer tiers and clustering technologies in the back-end tiers to allow scaling both horizontally and vertically depending on marketplace utilization. 
Data integrityIntegrity and security:  Security.We are committed to protecting our users' information and we take the integrity and security of the data provided by them very seriously. To that end, we have established data protection policies which are implemented and enforced using the latest technologies. All sensitive information is transmitted on secure channels using SSL technology, with SSL certificates issued by Symantec or DigiCert. We employ principles of least privilege and layered security to protect stored sensitive information. InformationSensitive information at rest is encrypted using the industry level encryption technologies with appropriate controls to access the data. We protect the network perimeter using the latest technologies including but not limited to firewall and anti-virus threat management techniques. We use strong multi-factor authentication to protect and monitor remote access. We back up all data securely and would expect to recover operations in a short period of time in the event of a disaster. Logging and monitoring of the systems and security controls enables us to ensure that the controls are functional and that alerts are triggered on security violations.


Fraud detection: Detection.We employ a combination of proprietary technologies and commercially available licensed technologies and solutions to prevent and detect fraud. These include knowledge-based authentication, out-of-band authentication and notification, behavioral analytics and digital fingerprinting to prevent identity fraud. We use services from third-party vendors for user identification, credit checks and for checking customer names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals and other lists maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). In addition, we use specialized third-party software to augment the identity fraud detection systems. We also have a dedicated team which conducts additional investigations of cases flagged for high fraud risk. Finally, we enable investorsusers to report suspicious activity, which we may then evaluate further.
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark, and other rights, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect our proprietary technology, processes and other intellectual property. We enter into confidentiality and other written agreements with our employees, consultants and service providers, and through these and other written agreements, attempt to control access to and distribution of the software, documentation and other proprietary technology and information. Despite these efforts to protect our proprietary rights, third parties may, in an authorized or unauthorized manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain and market or distribute our intellectual property rights or technology or otherwise develop a product with the same functionality. Policing all unauthorized use of intellectual property rights is nearly impossible. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken or will take in the future will prevent misappropriations of our technology or intellectual property rights.
We have registered several trademarks in the United States, forincludingProsper,” “Prosper Healthcare Funding,” “Prosper.com,” and the Prosper and Prosper Healthcare Funding logos, and other trademarks.logos.
Employees and Contractors
As of December 31, 2017,2019, we employed 377404 full-time employees. The following table shows a breakdown by function:
Employees
Origination and Servicing163145 
Sales and Marketing1317 
General and Administrative - Research and Development81101 
General and Administrative – Other120141 
Total Headcount377

404 
None of our employees are represented by labor unions. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we believe that our relations with our employees are good.

11





Government Regulation
Overview
The lending and securities industries are highly regulated. The marketplace, Notes and Borrower Loans are all subject to extensive and complex rules and regulations. We also are subject to licensing and examination by various federal, state and local government authorities. These authorities impose obligations and restrictions on our activities, WebBank’s activities and the Borrower Loans acquired and Notes issued through our marketplace. In particular, these rules may limit the fees that may be assessed on the Borrower Loans, require extensive disclosure to, and consents from, borrowers, prohibit discrimination and impose multiple qualification and licensing obligations on marketplace activities. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registrations, loss of approved status, voiding of loan contracts, indemnification liabilities to contract counterparties, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions and civil and criminal liabilities. While compliance with such requirements is at times complicated by our novel business model, we believe we are in substantial compliance with these rules and regulations. These rules and regulations are subject to continuous change, however, and a material change could have an adverse effect on our compliance efforts and ability to operate.
State and Federal Laws and Regulations
State Licensing Requirements. In most states we believe that WebBank, as originator of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace, satisfies any relevant licensing requirements with respect to the origination of such Borrower Loans. In addition, as needed, we seek licenses and/or authorizations of various types so that we may conduct activities such as servicing and marketing in all states and the District of Columbia, with the exceptions of Iowa North Dakota and West Virginia. We are subject to supervision and examination by the state regulatory authorities that administer these state lending laws. The licensing statutes vary from state to state and prescribe or impose different requirements, including: restrictions on loan origination and servicing practices, including limits on finance charges and the type, amount and manner of charging fees; disclosure requirements; requirements that licensees submit to periodic examination; surety bond and minimum specified net worth requirements; periodic financial reporting requirements; notification requirements for changes in principal officers, stock ownership or corporate control; restrictions on advertising; and requirements that loan forms be submitted for review.
State Usury Laws. Section 521 of the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (12 U.S.C. § 1831d) (“DIDA”) and Section 85 of the National Bank Act (“NBA”) (12 U.S.C. § 85), federal case law interpreting the NBA such as Tiffany v. National Bank of Missouri and Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First Omaha Service Corporation, and FDIC advisory opinion 92-47 permit FDIC-insured depository institutions, such as WebBank, to “export” the interest rate permitted under the laws of the state where the bank is located, regardless of the usury limitations imposed by the state law of the borrower’s state of residence unless the state has chosen to opt out of the exportation regime. WebBank is located in Utah, and Title 70C of the Utah Code does not limit the amount of fees or interest that may be charged by WebBank on loans of the type offered through our marketplace. Only Iowa and Puerto Rico have opted out of the exportation regime under Section 525 of DIDA and we do not operate in either jurisdiction. However, we believe that if a state in which we did operate opted out of rate exportation, judicial interpretations support the view that such opt outs only apply to loans “made” in those states.  
In May 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC that interpreted the scope of federal preemption under the NBA and held that a nonbank assignee of a loan originated by a national bank was not entitled to the benefits of federal preemption of claims of usury. On November 10, 2015, the defendant in the Madden case filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court for further review of the Second Circuit’s decision. On June 27, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition and refused to review the case, leaving the decision of the Second Circuit intact and binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont. If applied to any of the Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace, the Second Circuit’s decision could adversely impact our business.  
In January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claims that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator's lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank have each intervened in the state court case filed its own lawsuit against the Administrator seeking declaratory relief that the loans originated by the bank are subject to federal requirements that pre-empt Colorado state requirements.Marlette and Avant, respectively. We are currentlyhave been in discussions with the Colorado Department of Law regarding thecertain terms of the loansBorrower Loans offered to Colorado residents. Effective as of July 30, 2019, we and the Administrator entered into a stipulation for the continued operation of the loan program in Colorado, subject to certain financing charge and late fee restrictions during the period that the stipulation is in effect. The stipulation is intended to preserve the status quo pending resolution of the litigation against each of Marlette and Avant, but may be terminated with 21 days’ notice by either party. No further assurance can be provided as to the timing or outcome of these matters.

12






If a Borrower Loan made through our marketplace was deemed to be subject to the usury laws of a state that has opted-out of the exportation regime or becomes bound by the Second Circuit’s or a similar judicial decision, we could become subject to fines, penalties, and possible forfeiture of amounts charged to borrowers, and we may decide not to originate Borrower Loans through our marketplace in that applicable jurisdiction, which may adversely impact our growth. For more information, see “Item 1 A. RiskItem 1A, “Risk Factors—If our marketplace were found to violate a state’s usury laws, we mightmay have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.”
State Securities Laws. We are subject to the securities laws of each state in which the registration or qualification to offer and sell the Notes and PMI Management Rights has been approved. Certain of these state laws require us to renew the registration or qualification of Notes and PMI Management Rights on an annual basis.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) created many new restrictions and an expanded framework of regulatory oversight for the financial services industry. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protections by creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), which has broad authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth-in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions, such as our issuing bank, for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices” through its regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority. We are subject to the CFPB’s jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority and may become subject to their supervisory authority, as a servicer and acquirer of consumer credit. The CFPB may request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities, and also conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis.
Truth-in-Lending Act. The federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”), and Regulation Z, which implements TILA, require creditors to provide consumers with uniform, understandable information concerning certain terms and conditions of their loan and credit transactions. These rules apply to WebBank as the creditor for Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace, but because the transactions are carried out on our hosted website, we facilitate compliance at WebBank’s direction. For closed-end credit transactions of the type provided through our marketplace, these disclosures include providing the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, the amount financed, the number of payments and the amount of the monthly payment. The creditor must provide the disclosures before the Borrower Loan is closed. TILA also regulates the advertising of credit and gives borrowers, among other things, certain rights regarding updated disclosures and the treatment of credit balances. Our marketplace provides borrowers with a TILA disclosure prior to the time a Borrower Loan is originated. We also seek to comply with TILA’s disclosure requirements related to credit advertising.
Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”) prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, or the fact that all or part of the applicant’s income derives from any public assistance program or the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act or any applicable state law. Regulation B, which implements ECOA, restricts creditors from requesting certain types of information from applicants and from making statements that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application. These requirements apply both to a lender such as WebBank as well as to a party such as Prosper that regularly implements and communicates a credit decision. Investors may also be subject to the ECOA in their capacity as purchasers of Notes, if they are deemed to regularly participate in credit decisions. In the underwriting of Borrower Loans on our marketplace, both WebBank and we seek to comply with ECOA’s provisions prohibiting discouragement and discrimination. ECOA also requires creditors to provide consumers with timely notices of adverse action taken on credit applications. WebBank and we provide prospective borrowers who apply for a Borrower Loan through our marketplace but are denied credit with an adverse action notice in compliance with applicable requirements (see also below regarding “Fair Credit Reporting Act”).
Fair Credit Reporting Act. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) promotes the accuracy, fairness and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. FCRA requires a permissible purpose to obtain a consumer credit report, and requires persons to report loan payment information to credit bureaus accurately. FCRA also imposes disclosure requirements on creditors who take adverse action on credit applications based on information contained in a credit report. WebBank and we have a permissible purpose for obtaining credit reports on potential borrowers and WebBank and we also obtain explicit consent from borrowers to obtain such reports. As the servicer for the Borrower Loan, we have systems in place to report Borrower Loan payment and delinquency information to appropriate reporting agencies. We provide an adverse action notice to a rejected


borrower on WebBank’s behalf at the time the borrower is rejected that includes all the required disclosures. We have also implemented an identity theft prevention program as required by law.  
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) provides guidelines and limitations on the conduct of third-party debt collectors in connection with the collection of consumer debts. The FDCPA limits certain communications with third parties, imposes notice and debt validation requirements, and prohibits threatening, harassing or abusive conduct in the course of debt collection. While the FDCPA applies to third-party debt collectors, debt
13




collection laws of certain states impose similar requirements on creditors who collect their own debts. Our agreement with our investors prohibits investors from attempting to collect directly on the Borrower Loan. We use our internal collection team and professional external debt collection agents to collect delinquent accounts. They are required to comply with all other applicable laws in collecting delinquent accounts of our borrowers.  
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties. The SCRA, as well as certain state laws with similar protections for military members, require us to adjust the interest rate of borrowers who qualify for and request relief. If a borrower with an outstanding Borrower Loan qualifies for protection under the SCRA or similar state laws, we will reduce the interest rate on the Borrower Loan to 6% for the duration of the borrower’s active duty. During this period, the investors who have invested in such Borrower Loan will not receive the difference between 6% and the Borrower Loan’s original interest rate. For a borrower to obtain an interest rate reduction on a Borrower Loan due to military service, we require the borrower to send us a written request and a copywritten documentation of the borrower’s mobilization orders.active duty. We do not take military service into account in assigning Prosper Ratings to borrower loan requests and we do not disclose the military status of borrowers to investors.  
Military Lending Act. The federal Military Lending Act (“MLA”) provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions. Although originally enacted in 2006, the MLA applies to persons engaged in the business of extending consumer credit subject to the disclosure requirements of the TILA and Regulation Z with respect to loans made on or after October 3, 2016. The MLA prohibits creditors from imposing a Military Annual Percentage Rate (“MAPR”) greater than 36% in any consumer credit transaction involving a covered borrower. It also requires certain oral and written disclosures to be provided to covered borrowers. Additionally, the MLA prohibits creditors from requiring covered borrowers to waive rights to legal recourse, submit to arbitration, or pay a prepayment penalty or fee. Both Prosper and WebBank have ensured that the loan program complies with the MLA requirements for covered borrowers, including but not limited to the restriction on MAPR, the delivery of required disclosures and the prohibition of mandatory arbitration and waiver of legal recourse.
Other Lending Regulations. We are subject to and seek to comply with other state and federal laws and regulations applicable to consumer lending, including additional requirements relating to loan disclosure, credit discrimination, credit reporting, debt collection and unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices. These laws and regulations may be enforced by state consumer credit regulatory agencies, state attorneys general, the CFPB and private litigants, among others. Given our novel business model and the subjective nature of some of these laws and regulations, particularly laws regulating unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices, we may become subject to regulatory scrutiny or legal challenge with respect to our compliance with these requirements.
Electronic Funds Transfer Act. The federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”), and Regulation E, which implements it, provide guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts. In addition, transfers performed by ACH electronic transfers are subject to detailed timing and notification rules and guidelines administered by the National Automated Clearinghouse Association (“NACHA”). Most transfers of funds in connection with the origination and repayment of the Borrower Loans are performed by ACH. We obtain necessary electronic authorization from borrowers and investors for such transfers in compliance with such rules. Transfers of funds through our marketplace are currently executed by Wells Fargo and conform to the EFTA, its regulations and NACHA guidelines.  
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act/Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (“ESIGN”) and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“UETA”), authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures. ESIGN and UETA require businesses that want to use electronic records or signatures in consumer transactions to obtain the consumer’s consent to receive information electronically. When a borrower or individual investor registers with our marketplace, we obtain his or her consent to transact business electronically and maintain electronic records in compliance with ESIGN and UETA requirements.  


Privacy and Data Security Laws. The federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) limits the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information. Additional state and federal privacy and data security laws require safeguards to protect the privacy and security of consumers’ personally identifiable information, require notification to affected customers in the event of a breach, and restrict certain sharing of nonpublic personal information about a consumer with affiliated entities. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020, provides consumers in the state with extensive rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by businesses that are a certain size or that generate at least half of their revenue by selling personal information. In turn, the CCPA requires subject businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for timely responding to consumer requests submitted in exercise of their rights under the statute. We havemaintain a detailed privacy policy,
14




which complies with GLBA and the CCPA and is accessible from our website. We maintain participants’ personal information securely, and we do not sell, rent or share such information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes unless previously agreed to by the participant or otherwise permitted by applicable law. In addition, we take a number of measures to safeguard the personal information of our borrowers and investors and to protect it against unauthorized access.  
Bank Secrecy Act. In cooperation with WebBank, we have implemented an anti-money laundering policy and various anti-money laundering procedures to comply with applicable federal law. With respect to new borrowers and investors, we apply the customer identification and verification program rules and screen names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Asset Control’s (“OFAC”) pursuant to the USA PATRIOT Act amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) and its implementing regulation.
New Laws and Regulations. From time to time, various types of federal and state legislation are proposed and new regulations are introduced that could result in additional regulation of, and restrictions on, the business of consumer lending. We cannot predict whether any such legislation or regulations will be adopted or how this would affect our business or our important relationships with third parties. In addition, the interpretation of existing legislation may change or may prove different than anticipated when applied to our novel business model. Compliance with such requirements could involve additional costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial lending in the United States, our business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal and state legislation and regulations that may increase the cost of doing business.
Foreign Laws and Regulations
We do not permit non-U.S. based individuals to register as borrowers on our marketplace and the marketplace does not operate outside the United States. Therefore, we do not believe that our marketplace is subject to foreign laws or regulations.
Recent Developments
Item 1A.Risk Factors
HELOC. In November 2018, we announced our intent to launch a new digital Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) product in 2019, including our plan to partner with banks to improve the HELOC application process and reduce the time from application to closing for eligible borrowers. In November 2019, we announced our collaboration with BBVA USA, the U.S. subsidiary of Madrid-based BBVA, in offering HELOCs through our website. HELOCs are currently available to borrowers in Alabama, Arizona, Florida, and Texas. HELOCs will not be available on the Prosper marketplace for investment purposes.
Investor Mobile App. In August 2019, we publicly launched our new mobile app, Prosper Invest. The mobile app is designed to allow Note investors an on-the-go option for managing their Prosper accounts, including initiating cash transfers, checking the status of their Notes, and setting up the Auto Invest tool. Prosper Invest is available for both iOS and Android devices.
Available Information
The following filings are available for download free of charge at www.prosper.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such filings are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC’s website, at www.sec.gov. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, when evaluating our business. Any of the following risks, either alone or taken together, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. While we believe the risks and uncertainties described below include all material risks currently known by us, it is possible that these may not be the only ones we face.

RISKS RELATED TO BORROWER DEFAULT
The Notes are risky and speculative investments for suitable investors only.
Investors should be aware that the Notes offered through our marketplace are risky and speculative investments. The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL and depend entirely for payment on PFL’s receipt of payments under the corresponding Borrower Loans. Notes are suitable only for investors of adequate financial means. If an investor cannot afford to lose the entire amount of such investor’s investment in the Notes, the investor should not invest in the Notes.
15




Payments on the Notes depend entirely on payments PFL receives on corresponding Borrower Loans. If a borrower fails to make any payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan related to a Note, payments on such Note will be correspondingly reduced.
PFL will only make payments pro ratapro-rata on a series of Notes after it receives a borrower’s payment on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of servicing fees. PFL also will retain from the funds received from the relevant borrower and otherwise available for payment on the Notes any non-sufficient funds fees and the amounts of any attorneys’ fees or collection fees imposedour in-house collections department, a third-party servicer or collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts. Under the terms of the Notes, if PFL does not receive any or all payments on


the corresponding Borrower Loan, payments on the Note will be correspondingly reduced in whole or in part. If the relevant borrower does not make a payment on a specific monthly loan payment date, no payment will be made on the Note on the corresponding succeeding Note payment date.
Information provided by borrowers may be incomplete, inaccurate or intentionally false, and should generally not be relied upon.
Information in loan listings regarding the purpose of the loan and an applicant’s income, occupation and employment status is supplied directly by the applicant. Not all of this self-reported information is verified by us, and it may be incomplete, inaccurate or intentionally false.  Moreover, loan listings do not disclose the identity of applicants, and investors have no ability to obtain or verify applicant information either before or after they purchase a Note. Investors are therefore cautioned not to rely on self-reported information such as income, occupation and employment status when making investment decisions.  If an applicant supplies false, misleading or inaccurate information, an investor may lose part or all of the purchase price paid for a Note.
Investors should be aware that all listings are posted to our marketplace without our verifying self-reported information such as the purpose of the loan, income, occupation and employment status. Neither we nor WebBank verifies any statements by applicants as to how loan proceeds are to be used nor do we or WebBank confirm after loan funding how loan proceeds were used.  In the cases in which we select applicants for income and employment verification, the verification is generally completed after the loan listing has been created but prior to the time the Borrower Loan is originated. For the period from July 14, 2009 to December 31, 2017, we verified employment and/or income on approximately 65% of the Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace on a unit basis (555,084 out of 857,206) and approximately 75% of originations on a dollar basis ($8.3 billion out of $11.0 billion). Of these loans, we canceled 11% of the loan listings for which we verified employment and/or income information because the listings contained inaccurate or insufficient employment or income information. We selected these listings based on a combination of factors, including amount of loan requested, Prosper Rating, debt-to-income ratio and stated income. The number or percentage of applicants whose income and employment information is verified in relation to future listings may differ from the historical information supplied above. No assurance is made that such information will be verified with respect to any particular applicant or borrower.  Further, Note holders will not have any contractual or other relationship with any borrowers that would enable them to make any claim against such borrowers for fraud or breach of any representation or warranty in relation to any false, incomplete or misleading information supplied by such borrowers in relation to the relevant Borrower Loan or Note.
The Borrower Loans are not secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by any third party, and investors must rely on us or a third-party collection agency to pursue collection against any borrower.
Borrower Loans are unsecured obligations of borrowers. They are not secured by any collateral, and they are not guaranteed or insured by PFL, PMI or any third party, or backed by any governmental authority in any way. We and our third-party collection agencies will, therefore, be limited in our ability to collect on Borrower Loans. Moreover, Borrower Loans are obligations of borrowers to PFL as successor to WebBank, not obligations to the holders of Notes. Although payments onHolders of the Notes are dependent on the borrowers’ payments on the corresponding Borrower Loans, Note holders will have no recourse to the borrowers and no ability to pursue borrowers to collect payments under Borrower Loans. Holders of the Notes may look only to PFL for payment of the Notes.
The credit information of an applicant may be inaccurate or may not accurately reflect the applicant’s creditworthiness, which may cause an investor to lose all or part of the price paid for a Note.
We obtain applicant credit information from consumer reporting agencies, and assign Prosper Ratings to loan listings based in part on the applicant’s credit score. A credit score that forms a part of the Prosper Rating assigned to a listing may not reflect the applicant’s actual creditworthiness because the credit score may be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. Similarly, the credit data taken from the applicant’s credit report and displayed in listings may also be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. We do not verify the information obtained from the applicant’s credit report. Moreover, investors do not, and will not, have access to financial statements of applicants or to other detailed financial information about applicants.
The Prosper Rating may not accurately set forth the risks of investing in the Notes, no assurances can be provided that actualloss rates for the Notes will come within the estimated average annualized loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating, and investors have limited rights to cause Prosper to repurchase the Notes.


The Prosper Rating assigned to a loan listing may not accurately reflect the risks of investing in the Notes, and is not a recommendation by us to buy, sell or hold a Note. For example, the Prosper Rating for a listing could be inaccurate because the applicant’s credit report contained incorrect information. Similarly, although most of the information provided by applicants that is relevant to the Prosper Rating is verified by us before calculating the Prosper Rating, we do not verify all such information. For example, we do not verify the income information on all applications. Further, the Prosper Rating does not reflect PFL’s credit risk as a debtor (such credit risk exists even though, as the debtor on the Notes, PFL’s only obligation is to pay to the Note holders their pro ratapro-rata shares of collections received on the related Borrower Loans net of applicable fees). In addition, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will fall within the expected loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating. The interest rates on the Notes might not adequately compensate Note investors for these additional risks.
If we include in a listing a Prosper Rating that is different from the Prosper Rating calculated by us or calculate the Prosper Rating for a listing incorrectly, and such error materially and adversely affects a holder’s interest in the related Note, PFL will indemnify the holder or repurchase the Note. PFL will not, however, have any indemnity or repurchase obligation under the Amended and Restated Indenture, the Notes, the investor registration agreementInvestor Registration Agreement or any other agreement associated with the Note Channel as a result of any other inaccuracy with respect to a listing’s Prosper Score or Prosper Rating. PFL’s contractual repurchase obligations do not affect a Note holder’s rights under federal or state securities laws.
16




Investors who use the Recurring Investment or Auto Invest tools may face additional risk of funding Borrower Loans that have been erroneously selected by the tool.
Since it was first implemented in July 2011 through December 31, 2017,2019, the Recurring Investment tool (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) tool has experienced programming errors that affected 8,630 Notes and PMI Notes out of the 10,203,78011,534,093 Notes and PMI Notes purchased. The Auto Invest tool was first implemented on June 2, 2016. Since such time through December 31, 2017,2019, the Auto Invest tool has experienced programming errors that affected 2 Notes out of the 2,458,3656,522,117 Notes purchased.
In the event of any errors in Recurring Investment or Auto Invest that cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note such investor would have purchased had there been no error, PFL will either repurchase the Note, indemnify the investor against losses suffered on that Note or cure such error. See "Risk Factors - “Risk Factors—Risks Related to PFL and PMI, Our Marketplace and Our Ability to Service the Notes"Notes” for more information.
Some borrowers may use our marketplace to defraud investors, which could adversely affect investors’ ability to recoup their investment.
We performuse identity and fraud checks with external databases to authenticate each borrower’s identity. There is a risk, however, that these checks could fail and fraud may occur. In addition, applicants may misrepresent their intentions regarding loan purpose or other information contained in listings, and we do not verify the majority of this information. ExceptWhile PFL will indemnify an investor or repurchase Notes in certain limited circumstances (including, e.g., a material payment default on the Borrower Loan resulting from verifiable identity theft), we areit is not obligated to indemnify an investor or repurchase a Note or Borrower Loan from an investor if the investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud (other than verifiable identity theft) in connection with a loan listing, or due to false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a listing, whether in credit data, a borrower’s representations, similar indiciaindicators of borrower intent and ability to repay the Borrower Loan. If PFL does repurchaserepurchases a Note, or Borrower Loan, the repurchase price will be equal to the Note’s or Borrower Loan’sNote's outstanding principal balance and will not include accrued interest. Further, at the time of such repurchase of a Note,If PFL repurchases any Notes, PMI will also concurrently repurchase the related PMI Management Rights for zero consideration.
The fact thatwe have the exclusive right and ability to investigate claims of identity theft in the origination of Borrower Loans creates a significant conflict of interest between us and our investors.
We have the exclusive right to investigate claims of identity theft and determine, in our sole discretion, whether verifiable identity theft has occurred. Such a determination of verifiable identity theft may trigger an obligation by PFL to either repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans or indemnify the applicable Note holders. The denial of a claim under PFL’s identity theft guarantee would save PFL from its indemnification or repurchase obligation. Because investors rely solely on us to investigate incidents that might require PFL to indemnify the applicable Note holders or repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans, a conflict of interest exists between us and such investors.


PFLdoes not have significant historical performance data about performance on the Borrower Loans. Loss rates on the Borrower Loans may increase and prior to investing you should consider the risk of non-payment and default.
The estimated loss rates displayed on loan listings and used to determine Prosper Ratings have been developed from the loss histories of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace.  However, future Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace may default more often than similar Borrower Loans have defaulted in the past, which increases the risk of investing in the Notes.
If payments on the Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note become more than 30 days overdue, such investor will be unlikely to receive the full principal and interest payments that were expected on the Note, and such investor may not recover the original purchase price on the Note.
We may refer Borrower Loans that become past due to a third party collection agency for collection or we may collect on such Borrower Loans directly. If a borrower fails to make a required payment on a Borrower Loan within 30 days of the due date, we will pursue reasonable collection efforts in respect of the Borrower Loan, including referring theLoan. Referral of a delinquent Borrower Loan to a collection agency within five business days after it becomes 30 days past due.due will be considered reasonable collection efforts. If payment amounts on a delinquent Borrower Loan are received from a borrower after the loan has been referred to our in-house collections department or an outside collection agency, we or that collection agency may retain a percentage of that payment as a fee before any principal or interest becomes payable to an investor. Collection fees may be up to 40% of recovered amounts, in addition to any legal fees and transaction fees associated with accepting payments incurred in the collection effort.
For some non-performing Borrower Loans, we may not be able to recover any of the unpaid loan balance and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive little, if any, of the unpaid principal and interest payable under the Note. In all cases, investors must rely on our collection efforts or the applicable collection agency to which such Borrower Loans are referred, and are not permitted to collect or attempt collection of payments on the Borrower Loans in any manner.
Loss rates on the Borrower Loans may increase as a result of economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of the borrower.
Borrower Loan loss rates may be significantly affected by economic downturns or general economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of individual borrowers. In particular, loss rates on Borrower Loans may increase due to factors such as prevailing interest rates, the rate of unemployment, the level of consumer confidence, residential real
17




estate values, the value of the U.S. dollar, energy prices, changes in consumer spending, the number of personal bankruptcies, disruptions in the credit markets and other factors.
The Borrower Loans do not restrict borrowers from incurring additional unsecured or secured debt, nor do they impose any financial restrictions on borrowers during the term of the Borrower Loan, which may reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the full principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a Note.
If a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted, the additional debt may impair the ability of that borrower to make payments on his or her Borrower Loan and, as such, reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a corresponding Note. Moreover, the additional debt may adversely affect the borrower’s creditworthiness generally, and could result in the financial distress, insolvency, or bankruptcy of the borrower. To the extent that the borrower has or incurs other indebtedness and cannot pay all of his or her indebtedness, the borrower may choose to make payments to other creditors, rather than to PFL.
To the extent borrowers incur other indebtedness that is secured, such as a mortgage, a home equity line or an auto loan, the ability of the secured creditors to exercise remedies against the assets of the borrower may impair the borrower’s ability to repay the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment. Borrowers may also choose to repay obligations under secured indebtedness or other unsecured indebtedness before repaying Borrower Loans because there is no collateral securing the Borrower Loans. An investor will not be notified if a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted.
Marketplace lending is a new lending method and our marketplace has a limited operating history. Borrowers may not view or treat their obligations to PFL as having the same significance as loans from traditional lending sources.


The investment return on the Notes depends on borrowers fulfilling their payment obligations in a timely and complete manner under the corresponding Borrower Loan. Borrowers may not view marketplace lending obligations originated through our marketplace as having the same significance as other credit obligations arising under more traditional circumstances. If a borrower neglects his or her payment obligations on a Borrower Loan upon which payment of an investor’s Note is dependent or chooses not to repay his or her Borrower Loan entirely, such investor may not be able to recover any portion of the investment in a Note.
Our marketplace may fail to comply with applicable law, which could limit our ability to collect on Borrower Loans.
The Borrower Loans are subject to federal and state consumer protection laws. Our marketplace may not always be, and may not always have been, in compliance with these laws. Failure to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements applicable to our marketplace may, among other things, limit our or a collection agency's ability to collect all or part of the principal of or interest on Borrower Loans.
We regularly review the requirements of these laws and take measures aimed at ensuring that the Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace meet the requirements of all applicable laws. However, determining compliance with all applicable laws is a complex matter and it is possible that our determination may be inaccurate or incorrect. Also, changes in law, either due to court decisions, regulatory interpretations or rulings, or new legislation, may adversely affect the collectability of a Borrower Loan.
In general,,the Borrower Loans do not contain any cross-default or similar provisions. If a borrower defaults on any of his or her other debt obligations, our ability to collect on the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment may be substantially impaired.
The Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions. A cross-default provision makes a default under certain debt of a borrower an automatic default on other debt of that borrower. Because the Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions, a Borrower Loan will not be placed automatically in default upon that borrower’s default on any of the borrower’s other debt obligations. If a borrower defaults on debt obligations owed to a third party and continues to satisfy the payment obligations under the Borrower Loan, the third party may seize the borrower’s assets or pursue other legal action against the borrower before the borrower defaults on the Borrower Loan, which may affect our ability to collect from the borrower when or if the Borrower Loan becomes delinquent.
Borrowersmay seek the protection of debtor relief under federal bankruptcy or state insolvency laws, which may result in the nonpayment of an investor’s Notes.
Borrowers may seek protection under federal bankruptcy law or similar laws. If a borrower files for bankruptcy (or becomes the subject of an involuntary petition), a stay will go into effect that will automatically put any pending collection actions on the Borrower Loan on hold and prevent further collection action absent bankruptcy court approval. If we receive notice that a borrower has filed for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws, or has become the subject of an involuntary bankruptcy petition, we will put the borrower’s account into “bankruptcy status.” When this occurs, we terminate automatic monthly ACH debits on the Borrower LoansLoan and we will not undertake collection activity without bankruptcy court approval.
18




Whether any payment will ultimately be made or received on a Borrower Loan after a bankruptcy status is declared depends on the borrower’s particular financial situation. In most cases, however, unsecured creditors such as PFL receive nothing, or only a fraction of their outstanding debt and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive none or very little of the unpaid principal and interest payable on the Note.
Federal law entitles borrowers who enter active military service to an interest rate cap and certain other rights that may inhibit the ability to collect on Borrower Loans and reduce the amount of interest paid on the corresponding Notes.
Federal law provides borrowers on active military service with rights that may delay or impair our ability to collect on a Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) and other similar state laws require that the interest rate on preexisting debts, such as Borrower Loans, be set at no more than 6% while the qualified service member or reservist is on active duty. A holder of a Note that is dependent on such a Borrower Loan for payment will not receive the difference between 6% and the original stated interest rate for the Borrower Loan during any such period. The SCRA also permits courts to stay proceedings and the execution of judgments against service members and reservists on active duty, which may delay recovery on any Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments to investors on the corresponding Notes.
Beginning October 3, 2016, the Military Lending Act (“MLA”) prohibits requiring covered borrowers, which include active military servicemembers and their dependents, to waive the right to legal recourse or to submit to arbitration. This may present a greater risk of litigation costs related to covered borrowers.delay recovery on any relevant Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments on the corresponding Notes.
If there are any amounts under such a Borrower Loan still due and owing to PFL after the final maturity of the investors’ corresponding Notes, PFL will have no further obligation to make payments to the investors on such Notes, even if it receives payments on the Borrower Loan after the final maturity of such Notes. We do not take military service into account in assigning a Prosper Rating to loan listings. In addition, as part of the borrower registration process, we do not request borrowers to confirm if they are qualified service members or reservists within the meaning of the SCRA or the MLA. See “Item 1. Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information.


As of December 31, 2017, ninety2019, 106 Borrower Loans, with a total outstanding balance of $770$788 thousand are subject to the SCRA.
The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.
The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule, which in certain circumstances permits borrowers to assert any claims and defenses that they would have had against a seller of goods or services obtained with the proceeds of a loan against an originator or subsequent purchaser of the loan, could allow certain borrowers to raise such defenses against PFL to the extent of the outstanding loan balance. If such defenses are successfully raised, PFL will be unable to collect on the loan and it is unlikely that any further payment will be made on the corresponding Notes.
The death ofa borrower may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.
If a borrower dies while his or herwith a Borrower Loan is still outstanding, generally,PFL is required, upon receiving notice of the death, to stop accepting automatic loan payments and to refund any payments that were automatically debited after the borrower's date of death. Though we willmay seek to work with the executor of the borrower’s estate to obtain repayment of the loan. However,loan, the borrower’s estate may not contain sufficient assets to repay the loan, or the relatedits executor or trustee may prioritize repayment of other creditors. In addition, if a borrower dies near the end of the term of his or her Borrower Loan, it is unlikely that any further payments will be made on the corresponding Notes because the time required for the probate of the borrower’s estate will probablylikely extend beyond the final maturity date of the Notes, after which date PFL will cease to have any obligation to make payments on the Notes.

RISKS INHERENT IN INVESTING IN THE NOTES
The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL only and are not directly secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by PMI or any third party.
The Notes will not represent an obligation of borrowers, PMI or any other party except PFL, and are special, limited obligations of PFL. The Notes are not guaranteed or insured by PMI, any governmental agency or instrumentality, or any third party. Although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in the Borrower Loans corresponding to the Notes, the payments and proceeds that PFL receives on such Borrower Loans, the bank account in which such Borrower Loan payments are deposited, and the accounts in which investors’ funding amounts are deposited, the Note holders do not themselves have a direct security interest in the Borrower Loans or the right to payment thereunder. If an event of default under the Amended and Restated Indenture were to occur, the Note holders would be dependent on the indenture trustee’s ability to realize on the collateral and make payments on the Notes in the manner contemplated by the Amended and Restated Indenture. In addition, although PFL will take all actions that it believes are required under applicable
19




law to perfect the security interest of the indenture trustee in the collateral, if its analysis of the required actions is incorrect or if it fails timely to take any required action in a timely manner, the indenture trustee’s security interest may not be effective and holders of the Notes could be required to share the collateral (and any proceeds thereof) with PFL’s other creditors, or, if a bankruptcy court were to order the substantive consolidation of PMI and PFL (as described below), PMI’s creditors.
PFLis not obligated to repurchase Notes or indemnify Note holders or repurchase Notes except in limited circumstances.
PFL is only obligated to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes in limited circumstances. These circumstances include if (i) a material payment default under the corresponding Borrower Loan occurs as a result of verifiable identify theft; (ii) we include a Prosper Rating in a listing that is different from the Prosper Rating we calculated, or we calculate the Prosper Rating incorrectly; or (iii) if any errors in Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) or Auto Invest cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note, in which cases PFL also has the option to cure such error. PFL is not required to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes, however, if the Note holder’s investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud other than identity theft, or due to other false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a loan listing, whether in credit data, borrower representations or similar indicia of borrower intent and ability to repay the loan. Further, PFL is under no obligation to repurchase a Note or indemnify any holder of Notes if a correctly-determined Prosper Rating fails to accurately predict the actual losses on a Borrower Loan.
PFLmight incur indemnification and repurchase obligations that exceed its projections, in which case it may not have sufficient capitalliquidity to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations.
PFL believes its available liquidity will be sufficient to meet its reasonably anticipated indemnification and repurchase obligations. In determining its expected liquidity needs with respect to indemnification and repurchase obligations, PFL considers the history of such obligations incurred by it and PMI. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that if PFL is obligated to repurchase a Note or indemnify a Note holder, that it will be able to meet its repurchase or indemnification obligations. If PFL is unable to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations with respect to a Note, the investor in such Note may lose all of such investor’s investment in the Note.


Ourmarketplace allows a borrower to prepay a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. Borrower Loan prepayments will extinguish or limit an investor’s ability to receive additional interest payments on a Note.
Borrower Loan prepayment occurs when a borrower decides to pay some or all of the principal amount on a Borrower Loan earlier than originally scheduled. Borrowers may decide to prepay all or a portion of the remaining principal amount due under a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. In the event of a prepayment of the entire remaining unpaid principal amount of a Borrower Loan, each of the holders of the Notes corresponding to the Borrower Loan will receive his or her share of such prepayment but further interest will not accrue on such Borrower Loan or on such Note after the date on which the payment is made. If the borrower prepays a portion of the remaining unpaid principal balance, the term of the Borrower Loan will not change, but interest will cease to accrue on the prepaid portion. If a borrower prepays a Borrower Loan in whole or in part, an investor will not receive all of the interest payments that such investor originally expected to receive on the Note corresponding to such Borrower Loan. In addition, such investor may not be able to find a similar rate of return on another investment at the time at which the Borrower Loan is prepaid. Prepayments are subject to PFL’s servicing fee, even if the prepayment occurs immediately after issuance of a Note.
Prevailing interest rates may change during the term of the Notes. If this occurs, investors may receive less value from the purchase of Notes in comparison to other ways they may invest their money. Additionally, borrowers may prepay their Borrower Loans due to changes in interest rates, and investors may not be able to redeploy the amounts received from prepayments in a way that offers the return expected from the Notes.
The Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for payment bear fixed, not floating, rates of interest. If prevailing interest rates increase, the interest rates on Notes investors purchase might be less than the rate of return they could earn if they had invested the purchase price in a different investment.
Wemay not set appropriate interest rates for Borrower Loans.
We set interest rates for all Borrower Loans based on Prosper Ratings, as well as additional factors such as Borrower Loan terms, the economic environment and competitive conditions. If we set interest rates for Borrower Loans too low, investors may not be compensated appropriately for the level of risk that they are assuming in purchasing Notes, while setting the interest rate too high may increase the risk of non-payment. In either case, a failure by us to set rates appropriately may adversely impact the ability of investors to receive returns on their Notes that are commensurate with the risks they have assumed in acquiring such Notes.
20




The Notes will not be listed on any securities exchange and can be held only by PFL’sregistered Prosper investors. Further, no trading platform for the transfer of Notes currently exists and there can be no assurance a trading platform for the transfer of Notes will develop in the future. Therefore, investors should be prepared to hold the Notes they purchase until maturity.
The Notes and PMI Management Rights will not be listed on any securities exchange and all Notes and PMI Management Rights must be held by PFL'sregistered Prosper investors. Further, in connection with Prosper’s termination of its relationship with FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. onin October 31, 2016, as of 5:30 p.m. (PST) on October 27, 2016, a trading platform for the transfer of Notes and PMI Management Rights no longer exists. While we may, in our sole discretion, permit the establishment of another platform on which a secondary market may be made with respect to the Notes, there can be no assurance a trading platform for the Notes and PMI Management Rights will develop in the future. Therefore, noteNote purchasers must be prepared to hold their Notes and PMI Management Rights to maturity.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Notes are uncertain.
There are no statutory provisions, regulations, published rulings or judicial decisions that directly address the characterization of the Notes or instruments similar to the Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, although the matter is not free from doubt because payments on the Notes are dependent on payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan, PFL treats the Notes as debt instruments that have original issue discount (“OID”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Where required, PFL intends to file information returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in accordance with such treatment unless there is a change or clarification in the law, by regulation or otherwise, that would require a different characterization of the Notes. Investors should be aware, however, that the IRS is not bound by PFL’s characterization of the Notes and the IRS or a court may take a different position with respect to the Notes’ proper characterization. For example, the IRS could determine that, in substance, each investor owns a proportionate interest in the corresponding Borrower Loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes


or, for example, the IRS could instead treat the Notes as a different financial instrument (including an equity interest or a derivative financial instrument). Any different characterization could significantly affect the amount, timing, and character of income, gain or loss recognized in respect of a Note. For example, if the Notes are treated as PFL’s equity, (i) PFL would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income, including interest, accrued on the corresponding Borrower Loans but would not be entitled to deduct interest or OID on the Notes, and (ii) payments on the Notes would be treated by the Note holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes as dividends (that may be ineligible for reduced rates of U.S. federal income taxation or the dividends-received deduction) to the extent of PFL’s earnings and profits as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A different characterization may significantly reduce the amount available to pay interest on the Notes. Investors are strongly advised to consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the Notes (including any possible differing treatments of the Notes).
PFL’s ability to pay an investor principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability to match the timing of its income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Investors should be aware that PFL’s ability to pay principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to match the timing of income it receives from a corresponding Borrower Loan that it holds and the timing of deductions that it may be entitled to in respect of payments made on the Notes that it issues. For example, if the Notes are treated as contingent payment debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes but the corresponding Borrower Loans are not, there could be a potential mismatch in the timing of PFL’s income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and PFL’s resulting tax liabilities could affect its ability to make payments on the Notes.
Our participation in the funding of Borrower Loans could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest.
As is the practice with other marketplace lending companies, from time to time, we may fund portions of qualified loan requests in our marketplace and hold any Notes purchased as a result of such funding for our own individual accounts. Even though we will participate in funding Borrower Loans listed in our marketplace under the same terms and conditions and through the use of the same information that is made available to other potential investors in our marketplace, such participation may be perceived as involving a conflict of interest. For example, our funding of a Borrower Loan may cause the loan to fund, and in some cases, fund faster, than it would fund in the absence of our participation, which could benefit us to the extent that it ensures that Prosper generates the revenue associated with the loan.
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we purchased $297,000$389 thousand in Notes for investment.  

RISKS RELATED TO PFL AND PMI, OUR MARKETPLACE AND OUR ABILITY TO SERVICE THE NOTES
Our systemsWe have experienced errors on our platform that have resulted in incorrect reporting of performance returns to Note investors. If we are unable to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors, investors could be adversely impacted.
21




In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and marketplace utilizeseasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors, which resulted from errors in the code forming part of our calculation framework. On average, the error resulted in Note investors being shown annualized net return information that was approximately 260 basis points higher than the actual performance of Notes in their accounts. The error did not affect any other part of Note investors’ accounts, nor did it affect any other aspects of the platform, including the receipt and distribution of loan payments, deposits, monthly statements or tax documentation, or the Note and loan level information provided to investors. Following an SEC investigation, Prosper and the SEC came to a settlement to resolve the matter on April 19, 2019. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a negligence-based violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. PFL paid the penalty in full on April 24, 2019.
The error reveals a risk associated with the complex programs, algorithms and inputs and if they contain errors,that support our business could be adversely affected.
Our marketplace utilizes complex programs, algorithms and inputs.platform. We depend on these programs, algorithms and inputs to store, retrieve, process and manage data, as well as to provide marketplace features such as our credit assessments and underwriting, the Prosper Rating, estimated loss rates, estimatedhistorical returns, and individual note, noteNote, Note portfolio and platform wideplatform-wide performance data. Errors or other design defects within these programs, algorithms and inputs may result in a negative experience for borrowers and investors, delay introductions of new features or enhancements, or impact the information displayed on our website, orwebsite. They could also result in negative publicity and unfavorable media coverage, harm to our reputation, litigation, regulatory inquiries or proceedings, loss of or damage to our relationships with borrowers or investors, or loss of revenue or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.  In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the manner in which we calculated the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers provided to note investors. The error did not affect any other part of note investors’ accounts, nor did it affect any other aspects of the platform, including the receipt and distribution of loan payments, deposits, monthly statements or tax documentation, or the note and loan level information provided to investors.
Arrangements for back-up servicing are limited. If PMI fails to maintain operations or the Administration Agreement is rejectedor terminated (in bankruptcy or otherwise), investors may experience a delay and increased cost in respect of their expected principal and interest payments on Notes, and PFL may be unable to collect and process repayments from borrowers.


If the Administration Agreement (or the loan servicing provisions thereof) are terminated for any reason (whether as a result of PMI’s bankruptcy, non-performance or otherwise), PFL would attempt to transfer the loan servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and Notes to a third party pursuant to its contractual agreements with investors.
PFL has entered into a back-up servicing agreement with a loan servicing company that is willing and able to transition servicing responsibilities from PMI. There can be no assurance, however, that this back-up servicer will be able to adequately perform the servicing of the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes. If this back-up servicer assumes the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes, the back-up servicer may impose additional servicing fees (up to the maximums we have negotiated), reducing the amounts available for payments on the Notes. Additionally, transferring these servicing obligations to the back-up servicer may result in delays in the processing of collections on Borrower Loans and information with respect to amounts owed on Borrower Loans. If the back-up servicer is not able to service the Borrower Loans and Notes effectively, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on their Notes may be substantially impaired, even if their portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the corresponding Borrower Loans are paying on schedule.
In addition, it is unlikely that the back-up servicer would be able to perform functions other than servicing the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, such as facilitating the creation of new Borrower Loans through our marketplace, or managing PFL’s marketing efforts. PFL believes that it could find one or more other parties who could perform these and any other functions necessary to fully operate our marketplace in the absence of PMI. However, this process, and any related onboarding of such party or parties, will take time.
Any such delay or impairment that did not affect existing Note holders, because PFL or its back-up servicer proves able to continue servicing outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, could nonetheless delay PFL’s ability to facilitate the origination of new Borrower Loans and issue new Notes through our marketplace, which could adversely affect PFL’s finances and user relationships.
A decline in economic conditions may adversely affect our customers, which may negatively impact our business and results of operations.
As a lending marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate onin our marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace.
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace. If these investors cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our
22




marketplace and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our business could be adversely affected by a weakening market for securities backed by consumer assets.
PFL is involved in the securitization market through its business of selling loans to investors who, in turn, sell asset backed securities based on accumulated loan portfolios. If the market for asset backed securities based on consumer assets weakens, investors may cease or significantly decrease their funding of Borrower Loans through our marketplace and if PFL has been unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
The market in which we participate is competitive and, if we do not compete effectively, our operating results could be harmed.
The consumer lending market is competitive and rapidly changing. With the introduction of new technologies and the influx of new entrants, we expect competition to persist and intensify in the future, which could harm our ability to increase volume in our marketplace.


Prosper’s principal competitors include major banking institutions, credit unions, credit card issuers and other consumer finance companies, as well as other marketplace lending platforms. Competition could result in reduced volumes, reduced fees or the failure of our marketplace to achieve or maintain more widespread market acceptance, any of which could harm our business. In addition, in the future Prosper may experience new competition, including from companies possessing large, existing customer bases, substantial financial resources and established distribution channels. If any of these companies or any major financial institution decided to compete with our marketplace lending business, acquire one of our existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one of our competitors, our ability to achieve the same results would be challenged and our operating results could be harmed.
Most of our current or potential competitors may have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their marketplaces and distribution channels.  Our potential competitors may also have longer operating histories, more extensive customer bases, greater brand recognition and broader customer relationships than we have. These competitors may be better able to develop new products, to respond quickly to new technologies and to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns. Our industry is driven by constant innovation. If we are unable to compete with such companies and meet the need for innovation, the use of our marketplace could stagnate or substantially decline.
Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding, if this were to occur, the rights of holders of the Note holdersNotes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited,suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder ofon a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.
Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if this were to occur, the recovery, if any, of a holder of a Note may be substantially delayed in time (for example, due to the imposition of a stay on payments by the bankruptcy court) and may be substantially less in amount than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note even if a Note holder’s portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the Borrower Loans are paying on schedule. Further, although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in all of the Borrower Loans, in all payments and proceeds it receives on the corresponding Borrower Loans and in the bank account in which the Borrower Loan payments are deposited, the holders of the Notes would still be subject to risks associated with PFL’s insolvency, bankruptcy or a similar proceeding. The
In addition, the commencement of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding may, as a matter of law, prevent PFL from making regular payments on the Notes, even if the funds to make such payments are available. Because the indentureIndenture trustee would be required to enforce its security interest in the Borrower Loans in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, the indenture trustee’sIndenture trustee's ability to make payments under the Notes would be delayed, which may effectively reduce the value of any recovery that a holder of a Note may receive (and no such recovery can be assured) by the time any recovery is available.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, borrowers may delay payments or cease making payments at all.
Borrowers may delay or suspend making payments to PFL because of the uncertainties occasioned by its becoming subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, even if the borrowers have no legal right to do so, and such delay would reduce, at least for a time, the funds that might otherwise be available to pay the Notes corresponding to those Borrower Loans.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, interest accruing on the Notes upon and following such bankruptcy or similar proceeding may not be paid.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding for PFL, interest accruing on the Notes during the proceedingsproceeding may not be part of the allowed claim of a holder of a Note. If the Note holder receives a recovery on the Note (and no such recovery can be assured), any such recovery may be based on, and limited to, the Note holder’s claim for principal and for interest accrued up to the date of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding, but not thereafter. Because a bankruptcy or similar proceeding may take months or years to complete, a claim based on principal and on interest only up to the start of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding may be substantially less than a claim based on principal and on interest through the end of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, a holder of a Note may not have any priority right to payment fromthe corresponding Borrower Loan, may not have any right to payment from funds in the deposit account, and may not have any ability to access funds in the investors’ funding accounts (the “FBO Funding accounts”).


IfIn a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if PFL has failed to perfect the security interest properly,in Borrower Loans, investors may be required to share the proceeds of the Borrower Loans upon which their Notes are dependent for payment with PFL’s other creditors, including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans. To the extent that proceeds of the Borrower Loans would be shared with PFL’s other creditors, any secured or priority rights of such other creditors may cause the proceeds to be distributed to such other creditors before any distribution is made to investors on the corresponding Notes.
If a payment is made on a Borrower Loan corresponding to a Note before PFL’s bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, and those funds are held in the deposit account PFL maintains with Wells Fargo to collect borrower payments and have not been used by PFL to make payments on the Note as of the date the bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, there can be no assurance that PFL will or will be able to use such funds to make payments on such Note. Other creditors of PFL (including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans) may be deemed to have rights to such funds or interests in the deposit account and monies credited thereto that are equal to or greater than the rights of the holder of such Note.
23




Although PFL believes that amounts funded by investors into the FBO Funding accounts should not be subject to claims of its creditors other than the investors for whose benefit the funds are held, the legal title to the FBO Funding accounts, and the attendant right to administer the FBO Funding accounts, would be property of PFL’s bankruptcy estate. As a result, if PFL were to file for bankruptcy protection, the legal right to administer the funds in the FBO Funding accounts would vest with the bankruptcy trustee or debtor in possession. In that case, while neither PFL nor its creditors should be able to reach those funds, the indenture trustee or the investors may have to seek a bankruptcy court order lifting the automatic stay and permitting them to withdraw their funds. Investors may suffer delays in accessing their funds in the FBO Funding accounts as a result. Moreover, U.S. Bankruptcy Courts have broad powers at law and in equity and, if PFL has failed to properly segregate or handle investors’ funds, a bankruptcy court could determine that some or all of such funds were beneficially owned by PFL and should therefore be made available to PFL’s creditors generally.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, a holder of a Note may be delayed or prevented from enforcing PFL’s repurchase obligations with respect to such Note.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, any right of a Note holder to require PFL to repurchase the Note or indemnify such Note holder under the circumstances set forth in the investor registration agreementInvestor Registration Agreement or the Note might not be enforceable, and such holder’s claim for such repurchase may be treated less favorably than a general unsecured obligation of PFL.
Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PFL were substantively consolidated in this manner, the rights of the holders of the Notes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited, suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder on a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.
Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PMI became subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding and PFL were substantively consolidated with PMI, the risks described in the immediately preceding risk factors regarding (i) payment delays, (ii) uncollectability of interest accrued during the bankruptcy proceeding, (iii) being subordinated to the interests of PFL’s other creditors, and (iv) the indenture trustee’s inability to access funds in the deposit account or the FBO Funding accounts, would all be present and, in addition, the same considerations would apply in relation to the claims of creditors of PMI, including that such creditors of PMI may be determined to have perfected security interests or unsecured claims that take precedence over or are at least equal in priority to those of creditors of PFL (including holders of Notes).
In the event of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PMI, the ability of PFL or its back-up servicer to collect on Borrower Loans and operate our marketplace may be impaired to the detriment of the Note holders.
Inaddition, in the event of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PMI, (i) the implementation of back-up servicing arrangements may be delayed or prevented, and (ii) PMI’s ability to transfer its servicing obligations to a back-up servicer, or to transfer its other corporate and marketplace administration and marketing services to third parties may be limited and subject to the approval of the bankruptcy court or other presiding authority. The bankruptcy process may delay or prevent the implementation of back-up servicing, which may impair the collection on Borrower Loans to the detriment of holders of the Notes.


PMI owns and did not transfer to PFL ownership of the computer hardware that it uses to host and maintain the website or agreements with third parties relating to the hosting and maintenance of the website. Although PMI’s retention of such hardware and agreements should not bear on a bankruptcy court’s analysis of the legal separateness of PMI and PFL (or their respective assets and liabilities), the cessation of or substantial reduction of the day-to-day operations of PMI (because of or during its bankruptcy or otherwise) would materially impair and delay the ability of PFL or a back-up service provider to retrieve data and information in the possession of PMI and to operate our marketplace or elements thereof relevant to Borrower Loan and Note servicing.
PMI,, in its capacity as servicer, has the authority to waive or modify the terms of a Borrower Loan without the consent of the Note holders.
Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PMI is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to service and collect on the Borrower Loans in accordance with industry standards. Subject to that obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to (i) waive or modify any non-material term of a Borrower Loan, (ii) consent to the postponement of strict compliance with any such term, and (iii) in any manner grant a non-material indulgence to any borrower. In addition, if a Borrower Loan is in default, or PMI determines a default is reasonably foreseeable or that such action is consistent with its servicing obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to waive or modify a material term of a Borrower Loan, to accept payment of an amount less than the principal balance in final satisfaction of a Borrower Loan and to grant any indulgence to a borrower, provided that PMI has reasonably and prudently determined that such action will not be materially
24




adverse to the interests of the relevant Note holders. If PMI approves a modification to the terms of any Borrower Loan, it must promptly notify the corresponding Note holders by e-mailin each Note holder's account.
There can be no assurance that PMI, in its capacity as servicer, will be able to collect the principal amount or interest rate agreed to and/or sell charged off Borrower Loans in the future as a result of the material terms of such modification and the effect such modification will have on their Notes.business, regulatory or other considerations.
PMIProsper has incurred operating losses since inception and may continue to incur net losses in the future, which could adversely affect PFL’s ability to make payments on the Notes.future.
PMIProsper has incurred operating losses since its inception and it may continue to incur net losses in the future. For the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016, PMI had cash inflows from operations2018, Prosper incurred losses of $1.1$13.7 million and cash outflows from operations of $62.7$39.9 million, respectively. Additionally, from its inception through December 31, 2017, PMI2019, Prosper had an accumulated deficit of $380.8$434.5 million.
PMIProsper has financed its operations to date primarily with proceeds from the sale of equity securities. At December 31, 2017,2019, Prosper had approximately $45.8$64.6 million unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and $53.1 million available for sale investments at fair value.equivalents. PMI is dependent upon raising additional capital or debt financing to fund its current operating plan if it cannot generate sufficient positive cash flowsflow from operations. PMI’sProsper's failure to achieve profitable operations, positive cash flow from operations and obtainor sufficient debt orand equity financing, could adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.
Although our business has grown, we may be unable to manage our growth effectively and meet the demands that such growth places on our facilities, employees and infrastructure.  
As the number of borrowers, investors and Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace increases, PMI will need to increase its facilities, personnel and infrastructure in order to continue performing effectively its obligations under the Administration Agreement and to accommodate the effects that such growth will have on our servicing and marketplace needs. PMI must constantly add new hardware and update its software and our marketplace, expand customer support services, and add new employees to maintain the operations of our marketplace as well as to satisfy its servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and the Notes and its other obligations under the Administration Agreement. If PMI is unable to increase the capacity of our marketplace and maintain the necessary infrastructure to perform its duties under the Administration Agreement, PFL, or one or more other third-party service providers engaged by PFL, will have to perform the duties otherwise performed by PMI, and investors may experience delays in receipt of payments on their Notes and periodic downtime of our marketplace.
PFL hasa limited operating history.
PFL iswas formed in 2012 as a limited purpose vehicle with a limited operating history.vehicle. Under the Administration Agreement, PFL receives a license fee from PMI for granting PMI a non-exclusive, worldwide license to access and use our marketplace. In addition,


PFL earns servicing fees in relation to the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes that it retains from collections on the Borrower Loans. PFL believes this fee income is sufficient to cover its reasonably anticipated obligations. While PFL believes that it is adequately capitalized to meet its foreseeable obligations, and that its fee income is sufficient to meet its ongoing operating costs, its financial resources are limited and could prove to be insufficient. In addition, PFL has no employees and relies on PMI, as servicer, or other third-party service providers, to perform most of its day-to-day operations. The lack of PFL’s own employees, its limited operating history, and capitalization that is less than that of PMI could make it difficult for PFL to operate at a level that will be sustainable. Absent the services to be provided to PFL by PMI pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PFL's risk management process, ability to predict loss rates and the general operation of our marketplace would have a thinner margin for error than does PMI.
The market in which we participate is competitive and, if we do not compete effectively, our operating results could be harmed.
The consumer lending market is competitive and rapidly changing. With the introduction of new technologies and the influx of new entrants, we expect competition to persist and intensify in the future, which could harm our ability to increase volume in our marketplace.
Our principal competitors include major banking institutions, credit unions, credit card issuers and other consumer finance companies, as well as LendingClub and other marketplace lending platforms. Competition could result in reduced volumes, reduced fees or the failure of our marketplace to achieve or maintain more widespread market acceptance, any of which could harm our business. In addition, in the future we may experience new competition including companies possessing large, existing customer bases, substantial financial resources and established distribution channels. If PFLany of these companies or any major financial institution decided to enter our marketplace lending business, acquire one of our existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one of our competitors, our ability to compete effectively could be significantly compromised and operating results could be harmed.
Most of our current or potential competitors have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than Prosper does and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their marketplaces and distribution channels. Our potential competitors may also have longer operating histories, more extensive
25




customer bases, greater brand recognition and broader customer relationships than we have. These competitors may be better able to develop new products, to respond quickly to new technologies and to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns. Our industry is driven by constant innovation. If we are unable to compete with such companies and meet the need for innovation, the use of our marketplace could stagnate or substantially decline.
If Prosper fails to promote and maintain its brand in a cost-effective manner, it may lose market share and its revenue may decrease.
If PFL fails to successfully promote and maintain its brand, it may lose its existing users to competitors or be unable to attract new users, which would cause its revenue to decrease and may impair its ability to maintain our marketplace.  To succeed, PFLProsper must increase transaction volumes in our marketplace by attracting a large number of borrowers and investors in a cost-effective manner, many of whom have not previously participated in marketplace lending. If PFL iswe are not able to attract qualified borrowers orand sufficient investor purchase commitments, itwe will not be able to increase itsour transaction volumes. PFL believes that developing and maintaining awareness of its brand in a cost-effective manner is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our marketplace and attracting new borrowersborrower and investors. Furthermore, it believeswe believe that the importance of brand recognition will increase as competition in the marketplace lending industry increases. Successful promotion of PFL’sour brand will depend largely on the effectiveness of marketing efforts and the user experience on our marketplace. There can be no guarantee, however, that PFL’sThese brand promotion activities willmay not yield increased revenuesrevenues. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand, we may lose our existing users to competitors or prevent PFL’s revenues from decreasing.be unable to attract new users, which would cause our revenue to decrease and may impair our ability to maintain our marketplace.
The proprietary technology that makes operation of our marketplace possible is not protected by any patents. It may be difficult and costly for PFL to protect its intellectual property rights in relation thereto, or to continue to develop or obtain new technologies, which could adversely affect its ability to operate competitively.
On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred ownership of the marketplace, including the proprietary technology and all of the rights related to the operation of the marketplace, to PFL. PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace depends, in part, upon this proprietary technology. We intend to vigorously protect our proprietary interests in such technology. Despite our best efforts, however, we may not protect the proprietary technology effectively, which would allow competitors to duplicate our products and adversely affect our ability to compete. A third party may attempt to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use the proprietary technology without PFL’s consent. In addition, our marketplace may infringe upon claims of third-party patents and PFL or PMI may face intellectual property challenges from such other parties. PFL or PMI may not be successful in defending against any such challenges or in obtaining licenses to avoid or resolve any intellectual property disputes. Furthermore, the technology may become obsolete, and there is no guarantee that PFL will be able to successfully develop, obtain or use new technologies to adapt our marketplace to compete with other marketplace lending companies. If PFL cannot protect the proprietary technology embodied in and used by our marketplace from intellectual property challenges, or if our marketplace becomes obsolete, PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace and perform its servicing obligations could be adversely affected and, in such event, its ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.
PFL relies on a third-party commercial bank to process transactions. If PFL is unable to continue utilizing these services, its business and ability to service the Notes may be adversely affected.
Because PFL is not a bank, it cannot belong to or directly access the Automated Clearing House (ACH) payment network. As a result, it currently relies on an FDIC-insured depository institution to process its transactions. If PFL cannot continue to obtain such services from this institution or elsewhere, or if it cannot transition to another processor quickly, its ability to process payments will suffer and investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes will be delayed or impaired.
If the security of PFL's investors' and borrowers' confidential information stored in our systems are is breached or otherwise subjected to unauthorized access, PFL’s users’users' secure information may be stolen, our reputations may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liability.
As with any entity with a significant Internet presence, we and the third party we useparties that Prosper uses for website hosting occasionally have experienced cyber-attacks, attempts to breachbreaches of our and their systems and other similar incidents, none of which to-date have been successful.not had a material effect on our business, operations or reputation. Future attacks are likely to occur. Our marketplace stores PFL’s users’investors’ and borrowers’ bank information and other personally-identifiablepersonally identifiable sensitive data. Any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access could cause users’ secure information to be stolen and used for criminal purposes. Security breaches or unauthorized access to secure information could also expose us to liability related to the loss of the information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and negative publicity. If security measures are breached because of third-party action, employee or contractor error, malfeasance, faulty password management or otherwise, or if design flaws in the relevant software are exposed and exploited,


and, as a result, a third party or disaffected employee obtains unauthorized access to any investorinvestors’ or borrowers’ data, PFL’s relationships with its users willcould be severely damaged, and itPFL (or PMI) could incur significant liability. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we and ourPMI’s third-party hosting facilities may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. In addition, many states have
26




enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving their personal data. These mandatory disclosures regarding a security breach are costly to implement and often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may cause our users to lose confidence in the effectiveness of PFL’s and PMI’s data security measures. Further, California has recently enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, a comprehensive bill that affords individuals in the state affected by data breaches a private right of action against companies that have allegedly been the target of such breaches due to a failure to implement and maintain appropriate cybersecurity policies and procedures. Any security breach, whether actual or perceived, would harm our reputations, and PFLwe could lose users.
Any significant disruption in service in our marketplace or in PMI’s computer systems could adversely affect PMI’s ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement.
PMI’sPMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement could be materially and adversely affected by events outside of its control. The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of PMI's technology and its underlying network infrastructure are important to our respective operations, level of customer service, reputation and ability to attract new users and retain existing users. PMI's system hardware is hosted in threeseveral hosting facilities inlocated across the western United States. TheOur hosting and colocationfacilities service providers do not guarantee that access to our marketplace or to PMI’sPMI's own systems will be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. The operation of our marketplace and PMI’sPMI's operation of its own systems depend on the hosting and colocationour service providers' ability to protect the relevant systems in their facilities against damage or interruption from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality, temperature, humidity or other environmental concerns, computer viruses or other attempts to do harm them, criminal acts and similar events. If PMI’sPMI's arrangement with theany hosting and colocation providers arefacilities service provider is terminated, or there is a lapse of service or damage to theirsuch provider's facilities, PMI could experience interruptions in providing its services under the Administration Agreement, PFL could experience interruptions in the operations of our marketplace, and both could experience delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities. Any interruptions or delays in PMI’s performance of its services or in the functioning of and accessibility of our marketplace, whether as a result of a hosting and colocationfacility service provider or other third-party error, PMI’sPMI's error, natural disasters or security breaches, whether accidental or willful, could harm PFL’s relationships with its users and its reputation. Additionally, in the event of damage or interruption, PMI’sPMI's insurance policies may not be sufficient for PMI to adequately compensate PFL for any losses that it may incur. PMI's disaster recovery plan has not been tested under actual disaster conditions, and PMI may not have sufficient capacity to recover all data and services in the event of an outage at one or more hosting facilities. These factors could prevent PMI from processing or posting payments on the Borrower Loans or the Notes, damage PFL's brand and reputation, divert the attention of PMI's employees, reduce PFL's revenue, subject PMI or PFL to liability and cause users to abandon our marketplace, any of which could adversely affect our respective businesses, financial condition and results of operations. 
Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions.
Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions. If a “hacker” were able to infiltrate our marketplace, users would be subject to the increased risk of fraud or borrower identity theft and may experience losses on, or delays in the recoupment of amounts owed on, a fraudulently induced purchase of a Note. Additionally, if a hacker were able to access our secure files, he or she might be able to gain access to users’ personal information. While we have taken steps to prevent such activity from affecting our marketplace, if these measureswe are unsuccessful,unable to prevent such activity, the value of investors’ investment in the Notes could be adversely affected.
Competition for PMI’s Prosper's employees is intense, and PMIProsper may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees it needs to perform under the Administration Agreement.
Competition for highly skilled technical and financial personnel is extremely intense. PMIProsper may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at compensation levels consistent with its existing compensation and salary structure. Many of the companies with which PMIProsper competes for experienced employees have greater resources than PMIProsper has and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.
In addition, PMIProsper invests significant time and expense in training its employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek to recruit them. If PMIProsper fails to retain its employees, it could incur significant expenses in hiring and training their replacements and the quality of our services and our ability to serve borrower and investors could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect on PMI’sPMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.
PMI’s growth could strain its personnel resources and infrastructure, and if PMI is unable to implement appropriate controls and procedures to manage its growth, this may adversely affect its ability to perform under the Administration Agreement.
PMI’s growth in headcount and operations since its inception has placed, and will continue to place, to the extent that PMI is able to sustain such growth, a significant strain on its management and its administrative, operational and financial reporting infrastructure.


PMI’s success will depend in part on the abilityPurchasers of its senior management to effectively manage the growth it achieves. To do so, PMI must continue to hire, train and manage new employees as needed. If PMI’s new hires perform poorly, or if PMI is unsuccessful in hiring, training, managing and integrating new employees, or if PMI is not successful in retaining its existing employees, PMI’s ability to perform under the Administration Agreement may be impaired. To manage the expected growth of PMI’s operations and personnel, PMI will need to continue to improve its operational and financial controls and update its reporting procedures and systems. The addition of new employees and the system development that PMI anticipates will be necessary to manage its growth will increase PMI’s cost base, which will make it more difficult for PMI to offset any future revenue shortfalls by reducing expenses in the short term. If PMI fails to successfully manage its growth, it will be unable to execute its business plan and its ability to perform under the Administration Agreement may be impaired.
Investors in Notes will have no control over us and will not be able to influence our corporate matters.
PFL is not offering and will not offer equity interests in its equity interests.company. Investors who purchase Notes offered through our marketplace will have no equity interest in either of PMI and PFLus and no ability to vote on or influence our decisions. As a result, PMI, which owns all of PFL’sPFL's outstanding equity interests, will continue to have sole control over PFL’sPFL's governance matters, subject
27




to the presence of PFL’sPFL's independent directors, whose consent will be required before PFL can take certain extraordinary actions, and subject to the limitations specified in PFL’sPFL's organizational documents and the Amended and Restated Indenture.
Events beyond our control may damage our ability to maintain adequate records, maintain our marketplace or perform the servicing obligations. If such events result in a system failure, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes would be substantially harmed.
If a catastrophic event resulted in a marketplace outage and physical data loss and/or affected our electronic data storage and back-up storage systems, PFL’s ability (and PMI’s ability as servicer under the Administration Agreement) to perform its servicing obligations would be materially and adversely affected. Such events include, but are not limited to, fires, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, natural disasters, computer viruses and telecommunications failures. In the event of any marketplace outage or physical data loss described in this paragraph, PFL cannot guarantee that investors would be able to recoup their investment in the Notes.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions that may be difficult to integrate, fail to achieve their strategic objectives, disrupt our business or divert management attention.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions of businesses, technologies and products that it intends to complement its existing business, solutions, services and technologies. PMI cannot provide assurance that the acquisitions it has made or will make in the future will provide it with the benefits or achieve the results anticipated in entering into the transaction. Acquisitions are typically accompanied by a number of risks, including: difficulties assimilating and retaining the management and other personnel, culture and operations of the acquired businesses; potential disruption of ongoing business and distraction of management; difficulties in maintaining acceptable standards, controls, procedures and policies, including integrating financial reporting and operating systems, particularly with respect to foreign and/or public subsidiaries; potential loss of existing or acquired strategic operating partners, users and customers following an acquisition; difficulties in integrating acquired technologies and products into our solutions and services; and unexpected costs and expenses resulting from the acquisition, and potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses.
In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt, acquisition-related costs and expenses, restructuring charges and write-offs. Acquisitions may also result in goodwill and other intangible assets that are subject to impairment tests, which could result in future impairment charges.
PMI may enter into negotiations for acquisitions that are not ultimately consummated. Those negotiations could result in diversion of management time and significant out-of-pocket costs. If PMI fails to evaluate and execute acquisitions successfully, PMI may not be able to achieve its anticipated level of growth and its business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Events beyond our control may damage our ability to maintain adequate records, maintain our marketplace or perform the servicing obligations. If such events result in a system failure, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes would be substantially harmed.
If a catastrophic event resulted in a marketplace outage and physical data loss and/or affected our electronic data storage and back-up storage systems, PFL’s ability (and PMI’s ability as servicer under the Administration Agreement) to perform its servicing obligations would be materially and adversely affected. Such events include, but are not limited to, fires, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, natural disasters, computer viruses and telecommunications failures. In the event of any marketplace outage or physical data loss described in this paragraph, PFL cannot guarantee that investors would be able to recoup their investment in the Notes.
Public health emergencies and other events beyond our control may damage our ability to continue operations without disruptions, including our ability to attract new borrowers and investors, retain existing investors, as well as the ability of existing borrowers to repay their loans. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Our business is subject to the risk that external events could disrupt our day-to-day operations and impair the activities of borrowers and investors on our marketplace. For example, the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) has spread to the point that the World Health Organization declared it a global pandemic in March 2020. Locally, the outbreak of COVID-19 has forced many companies, including Prosper, to adopt wide-scale remote work protocols in an attempt to protect workforce health and slow community spread of the disease. While we have business continuity procedures in place to guide our response to a crisis, our attention may be diverted away from normal operations and our resources may be constrained. Likewise, borrowers and investors living in areas impacted by COVID-19 or other crises may also experience work slowdowns or stoppages, diminishing their capacity to apply for loans or invest through our marketplace. For existing borrowers, work slowdowns or stoppages may directly result in the inability to make loan payments, and may impair investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the corresponding Notes. Additionally, a potential recession or volatility in capital markets as a result of public health emergencies may cause existing investors to cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our marketplace. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
28




RISKS RELATINGRELATED TO COMPLIANCE AND REGULATION
Our marketplace represents a novel program that must comply with regulatory regimes applicable to consumer credit transactions as well as with regulatory regimes applicable to securities transactions. The novelty of our marketplace means


compliance with various aspects of such laws is untested. Certain state laws generally regulate interest rates and other charges and require certain disclosures, and also require licensing for certain activities. In addition, other state laws, public policy and general principles of equity relating to the protection of consumers, unfair and deceptive practices and debt collection practices may apply to the origination, servicing and collection of Borrower Loans in our marketplace. Our marketplace mayis also be subject to other laws, such as:
the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of their loans;
the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act;
the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, which regulates the use, reporting and disclosure of information related to each applicant’s credit history;
the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which regulates debt collection practices by “debt collectors” and prohibits debt collectors from engaging in certain practices in collecting, and attempting to collect, outstanding consumer loans;
state counterparts to the above consumer protection laws;
state and federal securities laws, which require that any non-exempt offers and sales of the Notes be registered;
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, and Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in connection with any consumer financial product or service;
the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which includes limitations on financial institutions’ disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties, in certain circumstances requires financial institutions to limit the use and further disclosure of nonpublic personal information by nonaffiliated third parties to whom they disclose such information and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information, and other privacy laws and regulations;
the California Consumer Privacy Act, which provides consumers in the state with extensive rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by certain businesses, and which obligates such businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for addressing consumer requests regarding their personal data;
the Bankruptcy Code, which limits the extent to which creditors may seek to enforce debts against parties who have filed for bankruptcy protection;
the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties;
the federal Military Lending Act, which provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions;
the federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which provide disclosure requirements, guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts;
the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures; and


the federal Bank Secrecy Act, which relates to compliance with anti-money laundering, customer due diligence and record-keeping policies and procedures.
We may not always be in compliance with these laws. Borrowers may make counterclaims regarding the enforceability of their obligations under borrower or consumer protection laws after collection actions have commenced, or otherwise seek damages under these laws. Investors may attempt to rescind their Note purchases under securities laws, and PFL or PMI’s failure to comply with such laws could also result in civil or criminal liability. Compliance with these requirements is also
29




costly, time-consuming and limits operational flexibility. See “Item 1. Business – Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information.
If our marketplace was found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.
The interest rates that are charged to borrowers and that form the basis of payments to investors through our marketplace are based upon the ability under federal law of the issuing bank that originates the loan to export the interest rates of the state where it is located. WebBank, the bank that issues loans through our marketplace, exports the interest rates of Utah, which allows parties to generally agree by contract to any interest rate. The interest rates offered by WebBank through our marketplace for Borrower Loans as of December 31, 2017 range from 5.31% to 31.82%, which equate to interest rates for Note investors that range from 4.31% to 30.82%. Some states where borrowers are located, including Utah, have no statutory interest rate limitations on personal loans, while other jurisdictions have a maximum rate less than the current maximum rate offered by WebBank through our marketplace. If a borrower were to successfully bring claims against us for state usury law violations, and the rate on that borrower's loan was greater than that allowed under applicable state law, we could be subject to fines and penalties. Further, if the current structure under which WebBank makes loans through our marketplace were successfully challenged, we may have to substantially modify our business operations and may be required to maintain state-specific licenses and only provide a limited range of interest rates for Borrower Loans, all of which may substantially reduce our operating efficiency and attractiveness to investors and possibly result in a decline in our operating results.
In addition, it is possible that state usury laws may impose liability that could affect an assignee's (i.e., PFL's and/or an investor who purchases Borrower Loans from PFL) ability to continue to charge to borrowers the interest rates that they agreed to pay at origination of their Borrower Loans.
As discussed in “Part I - Item 1 - Business - Government Regulation - State Usury Laws” above, in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that the debt buyer of a charged off credit card account could not rely on the National Bank Act's preemption of state interest rate limits for interest at rates imposed by the debt buyer after chargeoff.  The decision, which is binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont, has created some uncertainty as to whether non-bank entities purchasing loans originated by a bank may rely on federal preemption of state usury laws, and may create an increased risk of litigation by plaintiffs challenging our ability to collect interest in accordance with the terms of Borrower Loans. While the Madden decision specifically addressed preemption under the National Bank Act, it could support future challenges to federal preemption for other institutions, including an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank like WebBank. However, although there can be no assurances as to the outcome of any potential litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on our marketplace, we believe the Madden case addressed facts that are not presented by our marketplace lending platform and thus would not apply to Borrower Loans.
More recently, in January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claims that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator's lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank have each filed its own lawsuit against the Administrator seeking declaratory relief that the loans originated by the bank are subject to federal requirements that pre-empt Colorado state requirements. We are currently in discussions with Colorado Department of Law regarding the terms of the loans offered to Colorado residents. However, no assurance can be provided as to the timing or outcome of these matters.
We and our counsel are monitoring these matters closely and, as developments warrant, we will consider any necessary changes to our marketplace required to avoid the impact of these cases on our business model. Because of investor demand, the maximum APRs offered through our marketplace may be lower in some states than others.


The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a new agency, and thereThere continues to be uncertainty as to how the agency’s actions or the actions of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or any other new agency could impact our business or that of our issuing bank.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which commenced operations in July 2011, has broad authority over the businesses in which we engage. This includes authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth in Lending Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent “unfair,unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices”practices through its regulatory, supervisory, and enforcement authority. To assist in its enforcement, the CFPB maintains an online complaint system that allows consumers to log complaints with respect to various consumer finance products, including our business and the loan products we facilitate. This system could inform future CFPB decisions with respect to its regulatory, enforcement or examination focus.  On March 7, 2016, the CFPB issued a bulletin that provides an overview of marketplace lending, outlines tips for consumers and announces that it is accepting complaints from consumers.
We are subject to the CFPB’sCFPB's jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority, as a servicer and acquirer of consumer credit.authority. The CFPB may therefore request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities. TheIn addition, the CFPB may also conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis if the CFPB were to determine, through its complaint systembased on, for example, consumer complaints, judicial opinions, or otherwiseadministrative decisions, that we wereare engaging in activities that pose risks to consumers. In addition, the CFPB has announced that it plans to make a rule for the direct supervision of nonbank installment lenders, which may permit the CFPB to conduct periodic examinations of our business.
There continues to be uncertainty as to how the CFPB’sCFPB's strategies and priorities, including in both its examination and enforcement processes, will impact our businesses and our results of operations going forward. Actions by the CFPB could result in requirements to alter or cease offering affected loan products and services, making them less attractive and restricting our ability to offer them.
Although we have committed resources to enhancing our compliance programs, actions by the CFPB or other regulators against us, our issuing bank or our competitors that discourage the use of the marketplace model or suggest to consumers the desirability of other loan products or services could result in reputational harm and a loss of borrowers or investors. Our compliance costs and litigation exposure could increase materially if the CFPB or other regulators enact new regulations, change regulations that were previously adopted, modify, through supervision or enforcement, past regulatory guidance, or interpret existing regulations in a manner different or stricter than have been previously interpreted.
Noncompliance with laws and regulations may impair our ability to facilitate the origination of or service Borrower Loans.
Generally, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements may, among other things, limit our or a third party collection agency’sagency's ability to collect all or part of the principal amount of or interest on the Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for payment. In addition, non-compliance could subject us to damages, revocation of required licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions, and civil and criminal liability, which may harm PFL’sPFL's business and ability to maintain our marketplace and may result in borrowers rescinding their Borrower Loans.
Where applicable, we seek to comply with state lending, servicing and similar statutes. We arestatutes, and we continually evaluating the need forevaluate our licensing in variousneeds. In U.S. jurisdictions and there is a riskwith licensing or other requirements that at any given time, we will notbelieve may be applicable to our marketplace, we have obtained necessary licenses required to operate in all U.S. jurisdictions.  Ifor comply with the relevant requirements. Nevertheless, if we are found to not comply with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or face other sanctions, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to continue to facilitate the origination of Borrower Loans through our marketplace, and on our ability to perform servicing obligations or make our marketplace available to borrowers in particular states, which may impair investors’investors' ability to receive the payments of principal and interest on the Notes that they expect to receive. For more information about
If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.
If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed. The interest rates that are charged to borrowers and that form the basis of payments to investors through our marketplace are based upon the ability under federal law of the issuing bank that originates the loan to export the interest rates of the state where it is located and on Prosper's ability to assist the bank in arranging such loans. WebBank, the bank that issues loans through our marketplace, exports the interest rates of Utah, which allows parties to generally agree by contract to any interest rate. The interest rates offered by WebBank through our marketplace for Borrower Loans as of December 31, 2019 range from 5.31% to 31.82%, which equate to interest rates for Note investors that range from 4.31% to 30.82%. Some states where borrowers are located, including Utah, have no statutory interest rate limitations on personal loans, while other jurisdictions have a maximum rate less than the current maximum rate offered by WebBank through our marketplace. If a borrower were to successfully bring claims against us for state usury or other state law violations, we could be subject to fines and penalties. Further, if the current structure under which WebBank makes loans through our marketplace were
30




successfully challenged, we may have to substantially modify our business operations and may be required to maintain state-specific licenses and only provide a limited range of interest rates for Borrower Loans, all of which may substantially reduce our operating efficiency and attractiveness to investors and possibly result in a decline in our operating results. Recent litigation has successfully challenged lending arrangements in which banks or other exempt entities make loans and sell those loans to a third party charged with servicing the loans.
In addition, it is possible that state usury laws may impose liability that could affect an assignee's (i.e., PFL's and/or an investor who purchases Borrower Loans from PFL) ability to continue to charge to borrowers the interest rates that they agreed to pay at origination of their Borrower Loans.
As discussed in Part I, Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation—State Usury Laws” above, in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that the debt buyer of a charged off credit card account could not rely on the National Bank Act's preemption of state interest rate limits for interest at rates imposed by the debt buyer after charge-off. The decision, which is binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont, has created some uncertainty as to whether non-bank entities purchasing loans originated by a bank may rely on federal preemption of state usury laws, and regulations applicablemay create an increased risk of litigation by plaintiffs challenging our ability to uscollect interest in accordance with the terms of Borrower Loans. While the Madden decision specifically addressed preemption under the National Bank Act, it could support future challenges to federal preemption for other institutions, including an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank like WebBank. However, although there can be no assurances as to the outcome of any potential litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on our marketplace, we believe the Madden case addressed facts that are not presented by our marketplace lending platform and thus would not apply to Borrower Loans.
More recently, in January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claims that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator's lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank have each intervened in the state court case filed against Marlette and Avant, respectively. We have been in discussions with the Colorado Department of Law regarding certain terms of Borrower Loans offered to Colorado residents. Effective as of July 30, 2019, we and the Administrator entered into a stipulation for the continued operation of the loan program in Colorado, subject to certain financing charge and late fee restrictions during the period that the stipulation is in effect. The stipulation is intended to preserve the status quo pending resolution of the litigation against each of Marlette and Avant, but may be terminated with 21 days’ notice by either party. No further assurance can be provided as to the timing or outcome of these matters.
We and our counsel are monitoring these matters closely and, as developments warrant, we will consider any necessary changes to our marketplace see “Item 1. Business – Government Regulation.”required to avoid the impact of these cases on our business model. Because of investor demand, the maximum annual percentage rates offered through our marketplace may be lower in some states than others.
We rely on agreements with WebBank, pursuant to originatewhich WebBank originates loans on a uniform basis to qualified borrowers throughout the United States and sellsells and assignassigns those loans to PFL. If our relationships with WebBank were to end, we may need to rely on individual state lending licenses to originate Borrower Loans.
Borrower Loan requests take the form of an application to WebBank submitted through our marketplace. WebBank currently makes all loans to borrowers through our marketplace, which allows our marketplace to be available to borrowers on a uniform basis throughout the United States. If our relationships with WebBank were to end or if WebBank were to cease operations, one or both of PMI and PFL may need to rely on individual state lending licenses to originate Borrower Loans. Because neither of us currently possesses all required licenses to lend in every state, we might be forced to limit the rates of interest


charged on Borrower Loans in some states and we might not be able to originate loans in some states altogether. We also may face increased costs and compliance burdens if the agreements with WebBank are terminated.
Several lawsuits have sought to recharacterize certain loan marketers and other originators as lenders. If litigation or a regulatory enforcement action on similar theories were successful against one or both of PMI and PFL, Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace could be subject to state consumer protection laws and licensing requirements in a greater number of states.
Several lawsuits in the lending industry primarily involving high-interest “payday loan” marketers have brought under scrutiny the association between those firms and out-of-state banks. These lawsuits assert the loan marketers use out-of-state lenders in order to evade the consumer protection laws imposed by the states where they do business. Such litigation has sought to re-characterize the loan marketer as the lender for purposes of state consumer protection law and usury restrictions. Similar civil actions have been brought in the context of gift cards and retail purchase finance. Although we believe that our activities are generally distinguishable from the activities involved in these cases, a court or regulatory authority could disagree.
31




Additional state consumer protection laws would be applicable to the Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace if weone or both of us were re-characterized as a lender, and the Borrower Loans could be voidable or unenforceable. In addition, we could be subject to claims by borrowers, as well as enforcement actions by regulators. Even if we were not required to cease doing business with residents of certain states or to change our business practices to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could be required to register or obtain licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose a substantial cost on us.
As Internet commerce develops, federal and state governments may draft and propose new laws to regulate Internet commerce, which may negatively affect our businesses.
As Internet commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation by federal and state governments becomes more likely. Our businesses could be negatively affected by the application of existing laws and regulations or the enactment of new laws applicable to marketplace lending. The cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, and we may be unable to pass along those costs to PFL’sour users in the form of increased fees. In addition, federal and state governmental or regulatory agencies may decide to impose taxes on services provided over the Internet. These taxes could discourage the use of the Internet as a means of consumer lending, which would adversely affect the viability of our marketplace.
If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Company Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.
The Investment Company Act of 1940, or the “Investment Company Act,” contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment companies” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL and PMI believe each has conducted its business in a manner that does not result in being characterized as an investment company. If, however, PFL is deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, it may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and its activities may be restricted, which would materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. Any determination that PMI is an investment company under the Investment Company Act similarly could impair its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and thereby impair PFL’s ability to make payments on the Notes. If PFL or PMI were deemed to be an investment company, PFL or PMI may also attempt to seek exemptive relief from the SEC, which could impose significant costs and delays on their businesses.
If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Advisers Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.
The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the “Investment Advisers Act,” contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment advisers” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL believes that its business consists of providing a platform for marketplace lending for which investment adviser registration and regulation do not apply under applicable federal or state law, and does not believe that it is required to register as an investment adviser with either the SEC or any of the various states. The SEC or a state securities regulator could reach a different conclusion, however. Registration as an investment adviser could adversely affect PFL’s method of operation and revenues. For example, the Investment Advisers Act requires that an investment adviser act in a fiduciary capacity for its clients. Among other things, this fiduciary obligation requires that an investment adviser manage a client’s portfolio in the best interests of the client, have a reasonable basis for its


recommendations, fully disclose to its client any material conflicts of interest that may affect its conduct and seek best execution for transactions undertaken on behalf of its client. It could be difficult for PFL to comply with these obligations without meaningful changes to its business operations, and there is no guarantee that it could do so successfully. If PFL were ever deemed to be in non-compliance with applicable investment adviser regulations, it could be subject to various penalties, including administrative or judicial proceedings that might result in censure, fine, civil penalties (including treble damages in the case of insider trading violations), the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or other adverse consequences. Similarly, any determination by regulators that PMI must register as an investment adviser could materially adversely affect PMI and impair its ability to continue to administer our marketplace on PFL’s behalf.
PMI's administration of Quick Invest under its previous offering and PFL’s administration of Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, and Auto Invest under its current offering, could create additional liability for PFL and such liability could be material.
Quick Invest was a loan search tool that allowed investors to identify Notes that met their investment criteria. An investor using Quick Invest was asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings he or she wished to use as search criteria, (ii) the total amount he or she wished to invest, and (iii) the amount he or she wished to invest per Note. Quick Invest then compiled a basket of Notes for his or her consideration that met his or her search criteria.
Recurring Investment (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) is an automated loan search tool that allows investors to easily invest in Notes that meet their specific investment criteria by automatically bidding any available funds in their account on Notes that match their selected parameters, in accordance with their specified instructions. An investor using Recurring
32




Investment is asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings he or she wishes to use as search criteria, and (ii) the amount he or she wishes to invest per Note. If he or she wishes, the investor can further customize his or her investment criteria by applying one or more of several dozen additional search criteria, such as loan amount, debt-to-income ratio and credit score. The investor can also set aside a specific amount of his or her funds as a cash reserve that will not be invested by the Recurring Investment tool. After the investor has entered and saved the parameters of his or her search, Recurring Investment automatically (i) runs searches on theirthe designated criteria as new listings are posted on the marketplace, and (ii) places bids on any Notes identified by each such search. "
Auto Invest is an automated loan search tool that makes it easier for investors to build their desired portfolio of Notes by automatically investing any available funds in an investor’s account in Notes that match the investor’s specified investment criteria and allocation targets. An investor using Auto Invest is asked to select (i) a loan allocation target, or a target mix of loans based on Prosper Ratings, and (ii) the amount he or she wishes to invest per Note. The investor has the option of selecting a target from Prosper’s series of preset loan allocations based on the recent historical loan inventory on the marketplace, any of which may be customized by changing the individual allocation targets for each Prosper Rating, or he or she can create a custom loan allocation target across Prosper Ratings based on his or her specific risk tolerance. If he or she wishes, the investor can further customize his or her investment criteria by applying additional filters, such as loan term and employment status. The investor can also set aside a percentage of his or her portfolio as a cash reserve that will not be invested by Auto Invest. Investors may update their target allocations, cash reserve and other investment criteria, and pause and restart Auto Invest, at any time. Once the investor turns on Auto Invest, the tool may immediately begin placing orders for Notes in accordance with the investor’s current and target allocations and other criteria. The mix of Notes in any particular order may not match the investor’s individual loan allocation targets, but over time Auto Invest will place orders so that the aggregate holdings in the investor’s portfolio will approximate, to the extent possible, the allocation specified in his or her investment criteria. For more information about the Auto Invest tool and how it works, see "About the Marketplace-How to Bid to Purchase Notes-Auto Invest."
Since the Notes purchased through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest and Quick Invest are the same as Notes purchased manually, they present the same risks of non-payment as all Notes that may be purchased through our marketplace. For example, there is a risk that a Borrower Loan identified through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest may become delinquent or default, and that the estimated return and estimated lossor historical return (as applicable) for that loan individually, or the estimated lossreturn or historical return (as applicable) for the allocation target or the order or basket of Notes selected by Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest as a whole, may not accurately reflect the actual return or loss on such loan.loan or Notes. If this were to occur, an investor who purchased a Note from PFL through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest could pursue a claim against PFL in connection with its representations regarding the performance of the Borrower Loans bid upon through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest, respectively. An investor could pursue such a claim under various anti-fraud theories under federal and state securities law.
We may face liability under state and federal securities law for statements in our prospectus and in other communications that could be deemed to be an offer to the extent that such statements are deemed to be false or misleading.
Loan listings and other borrower information available on PFL's website as well as in sales and listing reports are statements made in connection with the purchase and sale of securities that are subject to the antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act and the Securities Act. In general, these liability provisions provide a purchaser of the Notes with a right to bring a claim against one or both of us for damages arising from any untrue statement of material fact or failure to state a material fact necessary to make any statements made not misleading. Even though PFL and PMI have advised investors of what they believe to be the material risks associated with an investment in the Notes and PMI management rights, the SEC or a court could determine that they have not advised investors of all of the material facts regarding an investment in the Notes and PMI Management Rights, which could give investors the right to rescind their investment and obtain damages, and could subject PFL and PMI to civil fines or criminal penalties in addition to any such rescission rights or damages.
PMI and PFL’s activities in connection with the offer and sale of securities onthrough our marketplace could result in potential violations of federal securities law and result in material liability to PFL and PMI.


PFL and PMI’s respective businesses are subject to federal and state securities laws that may limit the kinds of activities in which PFL and PMI may engage and the manner in which they engage in such activities. For example, changes to the manner in which PFL offers and sells Notes or other securities through our marketplace could be viewed by the SEC or a state securities regulator as involving the creation or sale of new, unregistered securities. In such circumstances, the failure to register such securities could subject PFL to liability and the amount of such liability could be meaningful. In addition, in 2008, PMI previously entered into a settlement with the SEC and consentedpursuant to the entry of a Cease and Desist order that requireswhich PMI agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations or any future violations of Sections 5(a) and (c) of the securities laws.Securities Act. Failure to comply with that order could result in material civil or criminal liability, which could materially adversely affect PMI’s business and PFL’s offering of Notes.


Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.




Item 2.Properties
33




Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters, including our principal administrative, marketing, technical support and engineering functions, is located in San Francisco, California, where we lease approximately 50,000 square feet of office space under leases that will expire February 28, 2023. We also have entered into leases for approximately 99,00046,000 square feet of office space located in Arizona Utah and Delaware.Utah. We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our current needs and that suitable additional alternative spaces will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms.
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Neither PMI nor PFL is currently subject to any material legal proceedings. 
PFL
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Prosper's disclosure set forth under Note 19, Commitments and PMI (collectively, "Prosper") and Colchis Capital Management, L.P. (“Colchis”) entered into a Supplementary Agreement, dated June 1, 2013, and Addendum to the Supplementary Agreement, dated November 18, 2013 (together, the “Colchis Agreement”), pursuant to which Prosper agreed to give Colchis certain incentives to encourage Colchis to invest in Borrower Loans and Notes through the platform. On April 21, 2015, Colchis filed a demand for arbitration to resolve interpretative questions relating to the Colchis Agreement, including, for example, whether certain rights given to Colchis extended beyond the termContingencies—West Virginia Matter, of the Colchis Agreement. On October 17, 2016, the arbitrator issued a final award in favorNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of Colchis. On November 17, 2016, this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
Prosper Funding's disclosure set forth under Note 8, Commitments and Colchis entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement, pursuant to which Colchis agreed to terminate the Colchis Agreement and waive all rights conferred under such agreement in exchange for a $9 million cash payment by Prosper and the issuance of a warrant to purchase shares of Series E-1 Preferred Stock representing 7% of Prosper’s capitalization on a fully diluted basis asContingencies—West Virginia Matter, of the dateNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of the issuance of the warrant for $0.01 per share.this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
On April 21, 2009, PMI and the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”) reached agreement on the terms of a model consent order between PMI and the states in which PMI, under its initial platform structure, offered promissory notes for sale directly to investor members prior to November 2008. The consent order involves payment by PMI of up to an aggregate of $1 million in penalties, which have been allocated among the states based on PMI’s promissory note sale transaction volume in each state prior to November 2008. A state that enters into a consent order receives its portion of the $1 million in exchange for its agreement to terminate, or refrain from initiating, any investigation of PMI’s promissory note sale activities prior to November 2008. Penalties are paid promptly after a state enters into a consent order. NASAA has recommended that each state enter into a consent order; however, no state is obliged to do so, and there is no deadline by which a state must make its decision. PMI is not required to pay any portion of the penalty to those states that do not elect to enter into a consent order. If a state does not enter into a consent order, it is free to pursue its own remedies against PMI, subject to any applicable statute of limitations. As of December 31, 2017,2019, PMI has entered into consent orders with 34 states and the District of the Columbia and has paid an aggregate of $0.78 million in penalties in connection therewith.
On November 26, 2008, plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit againstassociated penalties. PMI and certain of its executive officers and directors in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, California (the “Superior Court”). The suit was brought on behalf of all promissory note purchasers on the platform from January 1, 2006 through October 14, 2008. The lawsuit alleged that PMI offered and sold unqualified and unregistered securities in violation of the California and federal securities laws. The lawsuit sought rescission damages against PMI and the other named defendants, as well as treble damages against PMI and the award of attorneys’ fees, experts’ fees and costs, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. On July 19, 2013, solely to avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, the parties to the class action litigation pending before the Superior Court,has not entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement, and Release (the “Settlement”) setting forth an agreement to settle all claims related thereto. In connection with the Settlement, PMI agreed to pay the plaintiffs an aggregate amount of $10 million, payable in four lump sum payments of $2 million in 2014, $2 million in 2015, $3 million in 2016 and $3 million in 2017. On April 16, 2014, the Superior Court granted final approval of the Settlement.  Subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Settlement, the defendants will be released by the plaintiffs from all claims concerning or arising out of the offering of promissory notes on the platform from January 1, 2006 through October 14, 2008.  As of December 31, 2017, PMI has paid the entire aggregate amount of $10 million under the Settlement and the reserve for the class action settlement liability is $0 on PMI’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.  any such consent orders since 2016.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.


Part II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information; Holders of Record
There is no established public trading market for PMI's or PFL's common equity. As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were approximately 328346 holders of record of PMI’s common stock. As of December 31, 2017,2019, PMI owns 100% of PFL's membership interests.
Dividend Policy
PMI has not paid cash dividends since inception, and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Item 12 in Part III of this Annual Report for information about securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
In September 2017, PMI issued and sold 37,249,497 shares of PMI's Series G convertible preferred stock. Please see PMI's Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2017 for details regarding the sale.
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, PMI issued 43,7368,200 shares of common stock upon the exercise of warrants for an aggregate exercise price per share of $0.34.$0.02. During the year ended December 31, 2019, PMI issued 173,356 shares of
34




common stock upon the exercise of stock options for an aggregate exercise price per share of $0.15. These securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder relative to sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.
New Securities Resulting from the Modification of Outstanding Securities
On February 16, 2016, PMI amended and restated its certificate of incorporation to, among other things, effect a 5-for-1 forward stock split.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased(b) Average Price Paid Per Share(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(d) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet by Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1 to October 31
$

$
November 1 to November 31



December 1 to December 31



Total
$

$
The above share and per share amounts reflect the 5-for-1 forward stock split that PMI effected on February 16, 2016.


35





Item 6.
Item 6.  Selected Financial Data
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
The following selected historical consolidated financial data of Prosper Marketplace Inc. should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our consolidated financial statements, and the related notes under Item 15 “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 15 “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.


 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016201520142013
 (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information)
Revenues     
Operating Revenues     
Transaction Fees, Net$130,174
$95,130
$161,708
$68,229
$15,330
Servicing Fees, Net27,206
28,903
17,238
4,552
259
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans11,431
3,637
14,151
3,227
(193)
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans
(60,122)



Other Revenues4,806
5,245
7,687
1,828
1,130
Total Operating Revenues113,495
132,915
200,784
77,836
16,526
Interest Income     
Interest Income on Borrower Loans47,208
44,649
41,606
42,087
34,995
Interest Expense on Notes(43,954)(41,187)(38,174)(38,734)(33,321)
Net Interest Income3,254
3,462
3,432
3,353
1,674
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(514)(372)59
128
181
Total Net Revenues116,235
136,005
204,275
81,317
18,381
Expenses     
Origination and Servicing34,881
33,944
31,139
14,098
6,384
Sales and Marketing83,462
70,146
112,284
41,971
16,731
General and Administrative75,686
102,735
86,480
27,917
22,273
Restructuring Charges1,340
17,027



Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants

29,140
7



Other Expenses, Net7,392
30,341



Total Expenses231,901
254,200
229,903
83,986
45,388
Net Loss Before Taxes(115,666)(118,195)(25,628)(2,669)(27,007)
Income Tax Expense(508)546
340


Net Loss(115,158)(118,741)(25,968)(2,669)(27,007)
Excess Return to Preferred Shareholders on Repurchase


(14,892)
Net Loss Applicable to Common Shareholders$(115,158)$(118,741)$(25,968)$(17,561)$(27,007)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted$(1.65)$(1.85)$(0.47)$(0.39)$(0.82)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted69,687,836
64,196.537
55,547,408
44,484,005
32,984,135
Stock-based compensation included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows (dollar amounts are in thousands):


 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016201520142013
      
Origination and Servicing$996
$2,004
$1,231
$104
$16
Sales and Marketing553
2,914
2,561
767
24
General and Administrative10,689
14,824
9,219
1,150
182
Restructuring
45



     Total stock based compensation$12,238
$19,742
$13,011
$2,021
$222
 As of December 31,
 20172016201520142013
      
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:     
Cash and cash equivalents$45,795
$22,337
$66,295
$50,557
$18,339
Restricted cash152,668
163,907
151,223
81,300
49,824
Available for sale investments, at fair value53,147
32,769
73,187


Borrower loans, at fair value293,005
315,627
297,273
273,243
233,105
Total assets623,735
623,846
685,624
440,158
310,259
Notes at fair value293,948
316,236
297,405
273,783
234,218
Total liabilities567,357
512,781
477,056
364,387
285,929
Total convertible preferred stock and stockholders' deficit56,378
111,065
208,568
75,771
24,330

Prosper Funding LLC
The following selected historical consolidated financial data of Prosper Funding LLC should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our consolidated financial statements, and the related notes under Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

The following table presents a five year comparison of revenues, expenses and net income (in thousands) and Net Loss Per Share and weighted average number of shares outstanding:
 Years Ended December 31,
 20192018201720162015
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net$119,282  $123,373  $130,174  $95,130  $161,708  
Servicing Fees, Net23,406  29,025  27,206  28,903  17,238  
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans10,946  13,147  11,431  3,637  14,151  
Loss in Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(17,553) (72,316) (60,122) —  —  
Other Revenues5,953  4,697  4,806  5,245  7,687  
Total Operating Revenues142,034  97,926  113,495  132,915  200,784  
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans100,786  57,716  47,208  44,649  41,606  
Interest Expense on Notes(63,736) (45,886) (43,954) (41,187) (38,174) 
Net Interest Income37,050  11,830  3,254  3,462  3,432  
(Loss) Gain in Fair Value of Financial Instruments(25,514) (5,395) (514) (372) 59  
Total Net Revenues153,570  104,361  116,235  136,005  204,275  
Expenses
Origination and Servicing34,915  35,116  34,881  33,944  31,139  
Sales and Marketing73,824  77,997  83,462  70,146  112,284  
General and Administrative71,588  72,371  75,686  102,735  86,480  
Restructuring Charges34  1,762  1,340  17,027  —  
(Gain) Loss in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(11,235) (45,003) 29,140   —  
Other Expenses, Net(1,945) 1,891  7,392  30,341  —  
Total Expenses167,181  144,134  231,901  254,200  229,903  
Net Loss Before Taxes(13,611) (39,773) (115,666) (118,195) (25,628) 
Income Tax Expense100  172  (508) 546  340
Net Loss$(13,711) $(39,945) $(115,158) $(118,741) $(25,968) 
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted($0.18) ($0.57) ($1.65) ($1.85) ($0.47) 
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted70,511,605  70,384,501  69,687,836  64,196,537  55,547,408  

36




 Year Ended December 31,
 20172016201520142013
 (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information)
Revenues     
Operating Revenues     
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$101,500
$36,630
$57,919
$28,519
$7,632
Servicing Fees, Net25,963
28,604
16,218
4,168
372
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(48,691)3,637
14,151


Other Revenues170
478
1,500
3,733
233
Total Operating Revenues78,942
69,349
89,788
36,420
8,237
Interest Income on Borrower Loans47,208
44,649
41,380
42,370
32,605
Interest Expense on Notes(43,954)(41,187)(38,174)(38,734)(30,756)
Net Interest Income3,254
3,462
3,206
3,636
1,849
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(514)(372)59
209
849
Total Net Revenues81,682
72,439
93,053
40,265
10,935
Expenses 
 
 
  
Administration Fee – Related Party70,359
62,203
62,786
24,966
6,331
Servicing6,103
5,395
3,705
1,509
744
General and Administrative379
1,321
1,227
506
267
Other Expenses, Net
30,704



Total Expenses76,841
99,623
67,718
26,981
7,342
Total Net Income (Loss)$4,841
$(27,184)$25,335
$13,284
$3,593
Stock-based compensation included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
20192018201720162015
Origination and Servicing$417  $911  $996  $2,004  $1,231  
Sales and Marketing243  451  553  $2,914  $2,561  
General and Administrative3,868  7,039  10,689  14,824  9,219  
$4,528  $8,401  $12,238  $19,787  $13,011  

Select consolidated balance sheet information is presented as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
20192018201720162015
Cash and Cash Equivalents$64,635  $57,945  $45,795  $22,337  $66,295  
Restricted Cash$155,773  $149,114  $152,668  $163,907  $151,223  
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value$—  $22,173  $53,147  $32,769  $73,187  
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value$634,019  $263,522  $293,005  $315,627  $297,273  
Total Assets$1,084,828  $753,631  $623,735  $623,846  $685,624  
Notes at Fair Value$244,171  $264,003  $293,948  $316,236  $297,405  
Total Liabilities$1,068,335  $728,304  $567,357  $512,781  $477,056  
Total Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit$16,493  $25,327  $56,378  $111,065  $208,568  

37




 As of December 31,
 20172016201520142013
      
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:     
Cash and cash equivalents8,223
6,929
15,026
23,777
5,789
Restricted cash140,092
147,983
139,937
73,103
46,650
Borrower Loans Receivable at Fair Value

293,005
315,627
297,273
273,243
233,105
Total assets464,045
495,185
475,691
385,240
292,074
Notes at fair value293,948
316,236
297,405
273,783
234,218
Total liabilities433,679
463,860
439,386
338,949
272,850
Prosper Funding LLC

The following table presents a five year comparison of revenues, expenses and net income (in thousands):
Item 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
 Years Ended December 31,
 20192018201720162015
Revenues 
Operating Revenues 
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$49,818  $105,709  $101,500  $36,630  $57,919  
Servicing Fees, Net26,368  27,943  25,963  28,604  16,218  
(Loss) Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(5,058) (58,027) (48,691) 3,637  14,151  
Other Revenues155  270  170  478  1,500  
Total Operating Revenues71,283  75,895  78,942  69,348  89,788  
Interest Income on Borrower Loans41,146  43,569  47,208  44,649  41,380  
Interest Expense on Notes(38,492) (40,656) (43,954) (41,187) (38,174) 
Net Interest Income2,654  2,913  3,254  3,462  3,206  
(Loss) Gain in Fair Value on Financial Instruments, Net(375) (701) (514) (372) 59  
Total Net Revenues73,562  78,107  81,682  72,439  93,053  
Expenses
Administration Fee – Related Party62,575  70,491  70,359  62,203  62,786  
Servicing5,012  6,140  6,103  5,395  3,705  
General and Administrative33  597  379  1,321  1227  
Other Expenses, Net—  —  —  30704  —  
Total Expenses67,620  77,228  76,841  99,623  67,718  
Net Income (Loss)$5,942  $879  $4,841  $(27,184) $25,335  
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Select consolidated balance sheet information is presented as follows (in thousands):
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
December 31,
20192018201720162015
Cash and Cash Equivalents$7,462  $11,163  $8,223  $6,929  $15,026  
Restricted Cash$110,399  $136,018  $140,092  $147,983  $139,937  
Borrower Loans Receivable at Fair Value$245,137  $263,522  $293,005  $315,627  $297,273  
Total Assets$386,184  $433,002  $464,045  $495,185  $475,691  
Notes at Fair Value$244,171  $264,003  $293,948  $316,236  $297,405  
Total Liabilities$357,997  $401,757  $433,679  $463,860  $439,386  

38




Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Prosper’s historical financial statements and related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained


elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management’s Discussion and Analysis has been revised to include the effects of the restatement. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and Prosper’s actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those included in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
Overview
Prosper is a pioneer of online marketplace lending that connects borrowers and investors. Our goal is to enable borrowers to access credit at affordable rates and provide investors with attractive risk-adjusted rates of return.
We believe our online marketplace model has key advantages relative to traditional bank lending, including (i) an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects qualified supply and demand of capital, (ii) online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience, and (iii) data and technology driven automation that increases efficiency and improves the borrower and investor experience.experience through increased efficiency. We do not operate physical branches or incur expenses related to that infrastructure; instead, we use data and technology to drive automation and efficiency in our operation.operations. As part of operating our marketplace, we verify the identity of borrowers and assess borrowers’ credit risk profile using a combination of public and proprietary data. Our proprietary technology automates several loan origination and servicing functions, including the borrower application process, data gathering, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection.
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, our marketplace facilitated $2.9$2.7 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $2.7$2.5 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 94% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. During the quarter ended December 31, 2019, our marketplace facilitated $588 million in Borrower Loan originations, of which $545 million were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 93% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, our marketplace facilitated $694 million in Borrower Loan originations, of which $652 million were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 94% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. From inception through December 31, 20172019 our marketplace has facilitated $11.2$16.7 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $9.8$14.9 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 87%90% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period.
As a credit marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate on our marketplace as borrowers or investors and, consequently, could negatively affect our business and results of operations.

Results of Operations

39




Key Operating and Financial Metrics
The following table displays our key operating and financial metrics for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
Loan Originations$2,666,085  $2,836,720  $2,876,055  
Transaction Fees, Net$119,282  $123,373  $130,174  
Whole Loans Outstanding (1)
$3,659,601  $3,738,692  $3,717,825  
Servicing Fees, Net$23,406  $29,025  $27,206  
Total Net Revenue$153,570  $104,361  $116,235  
Net Loss$(13,711) $(39,945) $(115,158) 
Core Revenue (2)
$171,123  $176,677  $176,357  
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
$3,920  $9,448  $5,460  
(1) Balance as of December 31
(2) Core Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP Financial measures. For more information regarding these measures and reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Loan Originations$2,876,055
 $2,187,600
 $3,722,887
Transaction Fees, Net130,174
 95,130
 161,708
Whole Loans Outstanding (1)
3,717,825
 3,543,522
 3,804,268
Servicing Fees, Net27,206
 28,903
 17,238
Net Loss(115,158) (118,741) (25,968)
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
5,460
 (37,991) (5,145)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities1,081
 (62,667) 5,444

(1) BalanceLoan Originations
Total loan originations on the platform decreased 6% for the year ended December 31, 2019 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, which resulted in a decrease in Transaction Fees of 3%, or $4.1 million. The decrease in originations Prosper experienced during the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily due to the impact of credit tightening actions taken in the middle of 2018 to reduce borrower defaults across its platform.
Total loan originations on the platform decreased 1% for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, which resulted in a decrease in Transaction Fees of $6.8 million, or 5%. The decrease in originations Prosper experienced during the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily due to the impact of credit tightening actions focused on borrowers' ability to pay and borrower rate increases in a rising interest rate environment.
From inception through December 31, 2019, a total of 1,291,445 Borrower Loans, totaling $16.7 billion, were originated through our marketplace. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 195,656 Borrower Loans totaling $2.7 billion were originated through our marketplace as compared to 211,084 Borrower Loans totaling $2.8 billion originated in 2018, which represented a unit decrease of December 31.


(2) Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP Financial measure. For more information regarding this measure7% and a reconciliationdollar decrease of this measure6%. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 211,084 Borrower Loans totaling $2.8 billion were originated through our marketplace as compared to 223,002 Borrower Loans totaling $2.9 billion originated in 2017, which represented a unit decrease of 5% and a dollar decrease of 1%.
Loan origination volume by Prosper Rating was as follows (dollars in millions):
Year Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Amount%Amount%Amount%
AA$348  13 %$351  12 %$197  %
A639  24 %578  20 %365  13 %
B669  25 %708  25 %641  22 %
C606  22 %732  26 %872  30 %
D227  %317  11 %501  17 %
E63  %122  %236  %
HR17  %29  %64  %
Other (1)
97  %—  —  —  —  
Total$2,666  100 %$2,837  100 %$2,876  100 %
(1) Represents loans funded through the Whole Loan Channel but not assigned Prosper Ratings. These loans are sold only to institutional investors.

40




The mix of 2019 originations on the most comparable GAAP measure, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”Prosper platform was of relatively higher credit quality when compared to 2018, as Prosper tightened its credit underwriting to reduce borrower defaults across its platform.
Overview
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our net loss for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
20192018% Change20182017% Change
Total Net Revenues$153,570  $104,361  47 %$104,361  $116,235  (10)%
Total Expenses167,181  144,134  16 %144,134  231,901  (38)%
Net Loss Before Income Taxes(13,611) (39,773) 66 %(39,773) (115,666) 66 %
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)100  172  (42)%172  (508) (134)%
Net Loss$(13,711) $(39,945) 66 %$(39,945) $(115,158) 65 %
 
Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 % Change 2016 2015 % Change
Total Net Revenues$116,235
 $136,005
 (15)% $136,005
 $204,275
 (33)%
Total Expenses231,901
 254,200
 (9)% 254,200
 229,903
 11 %
Net Loss Before Taxes(115,666) (118,195) (2)% (118,195) (25,628) 361 %
Income Tax Expense(508) 546
 (193)% 546
 340
 100 %
Net Loss$(115,158) $(118,741) (3)% $(118,741) (25,968) 357 %

Total loan originations on the platform increased 31% in 2017 over 2016, which resulted in an increase in transactions fees of 37% or $35.0 million. Total net revenuesrevenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased approximately $19.82019 increased $49.2 million a 15% decrease fromwhen compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This was2018, primarily due to a decrease of $54.8 million of Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans that occurred in connection with the expiration of the Consortium Purchase Agreement in May 2019. Refer to Note 17 of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Consortium Purchase Agreement. Total expenses for 2019 as compared to 2018 increased $23.0 million primarily due to the $60.1$33.8 million increase of rebates that were providedChange in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $26.2 million, primarily due to membersthe increase in net revenue explained above.
Total net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $11.9 million when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to an increase of the Consortium via the$12.2 million of Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans as a result of issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants that vested during the year ended December 31, 2017.2018. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172018 decreased $22.3$87.8 million, a 9%38% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, primarily due to a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $27.0 million, restructuring charges of $15.7 million and other expenses of $23.0 million as Prosper continued to realize the cost savings from the restructuring that took place in 2016. These decreases in expenses were offset by a $29.1 million increase in the fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability and an $13.3of $45.0 million in 2018 compared to a $29.1 million increase in sales2017 and marketinga $5.5 million decrease in other expenses for 2018 as compared to 2017. The $5.5 million decrease in 2017.other expense was partially driven by impairment charges which we incurred in 2017 (see below for further details). Net lossLoss for the year ended December 31, 20172018 decreased $3.6$75.2 million, a 3% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2016,or 65%, when compared to 2017 primarily due to the decreaseddecrease in expenses experienced in 2017.
Total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased approximately $68.3 million, a 33% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to reduced loan originations on the platform, which decreased 42%. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $24.3 million, a 11% increase from the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to restructuring changes of $17.0 million and a $30.7 million expense resulting from the termination of a contract with Colchis Capital Management, L.P. These expenses were partially offset by cost reductions made in the second half of 2016. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $92.8 million, a 357% increase from the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to the lower revenues and increased expenses experienced in 2016.
Origination Volume
From inception through December 31, 2017, a total of 885,662 Borrower Loans, totaling $11.2 billion, were originated through our marketplace. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 223,002 Borrower Loans totaling $2.9 billion were originated through our marketplace as compared to 161,297 Borrower Loans totaling $2.2 billion originated during the year ended December 31, 2016, which represented a unit increase of 38% and a dollar increase of 31%.
The increase in originations Prosper experienced during the year ended December 31, 2017 were primarily driven by the actions Prosper took to increase the amount of capital available to make purchases through its marketplace.  On February 27, 2017, Prosper signed an agreement with a consortium of investors for the purchase of up to $5.0 billion of loans over two years (for more details please see Note 15 to our condensed consolidated financial statements).
Loan origination volume by Prosper Rating was as follows (in millions):


 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 Amount % Amount % Amount %
AA$197
 7% $240
 11% $327
 9%
A365
 13% 459
 21% 815
 22%
B641
 22% 528
 24% 988
 27%
C872
 30% 575
 26% 988
 27%
D501
 17% 259
 12% 421
 11%
E236
 8% 96
 4% 149
 4%
HR64
 2% 31
 1% 36
 1%
Total$2,876
   $2,188
   $3,724
  

During 2017, the mix of originations on the Prosper platform was relatively higher risk when compared to 2016, this was a result of two primary drivers.  First, Prosper raised its loss expectations for some applicant profiles, which caused some borrowers that would previously have received one rating (such as an A rating) to receive a lower rating (such as a B rating).  Second, demand for higher risk assets on the Prosper platform was greater in the first half of 2017 compared with the general demand seen in 2016. In the second half of 2017, Prosper increased the proportion of lower risk originations on its platform as it tightened credit to reduce borrower defaults.
Results of Operationsexplained above.
Revenues
The following table summarizes our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
 20192018% Change20182017% Change
Operating Revenues:   
Transaction Fees, Net$119,282  $123,373  (3)%$123,373  $130,174  (5)%
Servicing Fees, Net23,406  29,025  (19)%29,025  27,206  %
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans10,946  13,147  (17)%13,147  11,431  15 %
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(17,553) (72,316) 76 %(72,316) (60,122) (20)%
Other Revenues5,953  4,697  27 %4,697  4,806  (2)%
Total Operating Revenues142,034  97,926  45 %97,926  113,495  (14)%
Interest Income:
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale100,786  57,716  75 %57,716  47,208  22 %
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments(63,736) (45,886) 39 %(45,886) (43,954) %
     Net Interest Income37,050  11,830  213 %11,830  3,254  264 %
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(25,514) (5,395) 373 %(5,395) (514) 950 %
Total Net Revenues$153,570  $104,361  47 %$104,361  $116,235  (10)%
41

 
Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 % Change 2016 2015 % Change
Operating Revenues 
  
  
      
Transaction Fees, Net$130,174
 $95,130
 37 % $95,130
 161,708
 (41)%
Servicing Fees, Net27,206
 28,903
 (6)% 28,903
 17,238
 68 %
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans11,431
 3,637
 214 % 3,637
 14,151
 (74)%
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans

(60,122) 
 100 % 
 
  %
Other Revenues4,806
 5,245
 (8)% 5,245
 7,687
 (32)%
Total Operating Revenues113,495
 132,915
 (15)% 132,915
 200,784
 (34)%
Interest Income 
  
 

 

  
  
Interest Income on Borrower Loans47,208
 44,649
 6 % 44,649
 41,606
 7 %
Interest Expense on Notes(43,954) (41,187) 7 % (41,187) (38,174) 8 %
Net Interest Income3,254
 3,462
 (6)% 3,462
 3,432
 1 %
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(514) (372) 38 % (372) 59
 (731)%
Total Net Revenues116,235
 136,005
 (15)% 136,005
 204,275
 (33)%





Transaction Fees, Net
Prosper earnsWe earn a transaction fee upon the successful origination of all Borrower Loans facilitated through Prosper’sour marketplace. Prosper receives payments from WebBank as compensation for the activities Prosper performswe perform on behalf of WebBank. Prosper’sOur fee is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loans that Prosper facilitates on its marketplace and WebBank originates. We record the transaction fee revenue net of any fees paid by us to WebBank.  
Transaction fees increasedFees decreased by 37%$4.1 million, or 3%, for the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, primarily due to higherlower origination volume through our marketplace, as described above. The average transaction feevolumes.
Transaction Fees decreased by $6.8 million, or 5%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017, was 4.53%, an increase fromprimarily due to a lower average transaction fee of 4.35% for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase2018, a decrease from 4.53% for 2017. The decrease in the average transaction fee was due to marketing fee increases implemented in the second quarterhigher proportion of 2016 for certainloans with a Prosper Ratings. The marketing fee increases were partially offset by the fair valuerating of the loan trailing fee on loans originatedAA originating on the platform during the period.
Transaction fees decreased by 41% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to lower origination volume through our marketplace, as described above. The average2018. These loans have a transaction fee for the year ended December 31, 2016 was 4.35%, a slight increase from 4.34% for the year ended December 31, 2015.rate that is lower on average.
Servicing Fees, Net
We earn a fee from investorsInvestors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper through the Whole Loan Channel fortypically pay Prosper a servicing such loans on their behalf.fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates usProsper for the costs we incurincurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received. The servicing fee is generally set at 1%19% decrease in Servicing Fees during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 1.075% per annum of the outstanding2018 was primarily due to a lower principal balance of the corresponding Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment.
The decrease in servicing fees for 2017whole loans serviced, which was primarily due to the decreaselower loan originations as a result of credit tightening as described above and an increase in the average unpaidprincipal balance of Borrower Loans being serviced.loans held in consolidated warehouse and securitization trusts. Refer to Note 7 and 11 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for additional information on those warehouse and securitization transactions. The 7% increase in servicing feesServicing Fees for 2016the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was due to the increase in Borrower Loans being serviced as a result of the cumulative growth in sales of Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan Channel prior to 2016.  collection fees and higher overall average whole loan balance.
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans consists of net gains on Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan Channel. The increase$2.2 million decrease in 2017gain, or 17%, during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 20162018 was primarily due to an increase in rebates and a decrease in the volume of such sales during 2017whole loans sold due to an increase in loans originated through the platformlower loan originations as a result of credit tightening as described above and $1.9an increase in the principal balance of loans held in consolidated warehouse and securitization trusts.
The $1.7 million increase in gains, an increase of 15%, in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily due to $3.2 million less of cash rebates that were issued in 20172018 when compared to 2016.    
The decrease in 2016 compared to 2015 was due to the reduced volume of loans originated through the platform, as described above, and the related sales and rebates in the amount of $5.9 million that were given to investors in 2016 to encourage whole loan purchases. No rebates were given to investors in 2015.2017.  
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans relates to warrants to purchasethe fair value estimate of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrants issued to the Consortium that vestvested when the Consortium purchasespurchased whole loans under the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 17 of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements) that was signed in February 2017.


Other Revenues2017 and expired in May 2019. The $54.8 million decrease during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was due to a decrease in the number of warrants vested in 2019 as compared to 2018 consistent with the expiration of the Consortium Purchase Agreement. The increase of $12.2 million from the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily related to an increase in the number of warrants that vested in 2018.
Other revenuesRevenues
Other Revenues consist primarily of securitization fees and credit referral fees. Credit referral fees are where partner companies pay us an agreed upon amount for referrals of customers from our platform. Securitization fees represent fees Prosper earns to facilitate securitizations for purchasers of borrower loans.Borrower Loans. The decrease from 2016changes in Other Revenues were not significant for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. The increase of Other Revenues in 2019 was due to 2017 was not material.an amended referral partner contract.
The decrease in other revenue for 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily the result of decreased traffic to existing partners. As described below, Prosper decreased its sales and marketing efforts during the year, which resulted in less traffic to the marketplace and, as a result, less referrals to our existing partners.  
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale and Interest Expense on NotesFinancial Instruments
Prosper recognizes interest incomeWe recognize Interest Income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channeland Loans Held for Sale using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent we believe it to be collectible. We record interest expense on the corresponding Notes, Notes Issued by Securitization Trust, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Warehouse Lines based on the contractual interest rates. The interest rate charged on the Borrower LoansNotes is generally 1% higherlower than the corresponding interest rate on the Notecorresponding Borrower Loans to compensate us for servicing the underlying Borrower Loans.
Overall,
42




The increase of $25.2 million in Net Interest Income during the decrease inyear ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was due to net interest income earned on Loans Held for 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily driven by the decrease in volume ofSale and Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel.held in warehouse and securitization trusts. Overall, the increase in Net Interest Income of $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was due to the net interest incomeearned on the Loans Held for 2016 comparedSale purchased by Prosper with funding from the PWIT Warehouse Line (as defined in Note 11 of the accompanying notes to 2015 was primarily drivenPMI's consolidated financial statements).
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net
Prosper records Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by the increaseSecuritization Trust at fair value. Changes in volumefair value of Borrower Loans originatedfunded through Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of the Notes due to their borrower payment-dependent structure. Prosper's obligation to pay principal and interest on Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the outstanding balance.
In 2018, Prosper began using Warehouse Lines to finance the purchase of Loans Held for Sale for the purpose of earning Net Interest Income and contributing to securitization transactions. Loans Held for Sale consist primarily of loans held in warehouse trusts. Changes in fair value of Loans Held for Sale are not offset by changes in fair value of Warehouse Lines because Warehouse Lines are carried at amortized cost. See Note Channel.11 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for more details on Warehouse Lines. During 2019, Prosper co-sponsored and consolidated three securitization transactions. Refer to Note 7 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for additional information on those securitization transactions. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans held in consolidated securitization trusts are partially offset by changes in fair value of the Certificates Issued by the Securitization Trusts. Changes in fair value of loans held in warehouse and securitization trusts are generally negative due to actual charge-offs and changes in fair value adjustments that are attributable to changes in expected credit performance. We earn interest income on loans held in warehouse and securitization trusts during the period we own the loans, which partially offsets changes in fair value of those loans. The following tables illustrate the composition of the loans held in warehouse and securitization trusts by Prosper Rating, which is an indicator of the credit quality (in thousands except ratios):
Change in
Years Ended December 31,
20192018
Loans Held for Sale(1):
AA13 %15 %
A38 %20 %
B37 %25 %
C%24 %
D%11 %
E%%
HR— %%
Grand Total100 %100 %
Borrower Loans - Securitization(2):
AA%
A18 %
B24 %
C31 %
D14 %
E%
HR%
Grand Total100 %
(1) The percentages are calculated as the weighted average of month-end principal balances of Loans Held for Sale by Prosper Rating.
(2) The percentages are calculated as the weighted average of transaction date principal balances of Borrower Loans by Prosper Rating.


Fair Valuevalue of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Notes, net
The fair value of Borrower Loans, loans held for sale and Notes areCertificates Issued by Securitization Trust is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The mainkey assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, loans held for saleinclude default
43




rates and Notes include prepayment rates derived from historical prepayment rates for each credit grade, default rates derived from historical performance recovery rates and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on estimates of the perceived credit riskrates of each credit grade. Loans held for sale are primarily comprised of Borrower Loans held for short durations and are valued using the same approach as the Borrower Loans held at fair value.return that investors would require when investing in other financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The following table summarizesdetails the change in fair value adjustmentsof our financial instruments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively (dollar amounts in(in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
Assets:
Borrower Loans$(50,845) $(31,265) $(25,552) 
Loans Held for Sale(6,894) (4,616)  
Liabilities:
Notes22,812  30,574  25,031  
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust7,621  —  
$(27,306) $(5,307) $(514) 
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Borrower Loans$(25,552) $(25,934) $(21,594)
Loans Held for Sale7
 (7) (121)
Notes25,031
 25,569
 21,774
Total$(514) $(372) $59



Expenses
The following table summarizes our expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 20192018% Change20182017% Change
   
Origination and Servicing$34,915  $35,116  (1)%$35,116  $34,881  %
Sales and Marketing73,824  77,997  (5)%77,997  83,462  (7)%
General and Administrative - Research and Development17,246  17,066  %17,066  16,383  %
General and Administrative - Other54,342  55,305  (2)%55,305  59,303  (7)%
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(11,235) (45,003) 75 %(45,003) 29,140  (254)%
Restructuring Charges, Net34  1,762  (98)%1,762  1,340  31 %
Other Expense (Income), Net(1,945) 1,891  (203)%1,891  7,392  (74)%
$167,181  $144,134  16 %$144,134  $231,901  (38)%
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 % Change 2016 2015 % Change
Expenses 
  
  
      
Origination and Servicing$34,881
 $33,944
 3 % 33,944
 31,139
 9 %
Sales and Marketing83,462
 70,146
 19 % 70,146
 112,284
 (38)%
General and Administrative - Research and Development16,383
 26,214
 (38)% 26,214
 18,014
 46 %
General and Administrative - Other59,303
 76,521
 (23)% 76,521
 68,466
 12 %
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants

29,140
 7
 100 % 7
 
 100 %
Restructuring Charges1,340
 17,027
 (92)% 17,027
 
 100 %
Other Expenses

7,392
 30,341
 (76)% 30,341
 
 100 %
Total Expenses$231,901
 $254,200
 (9)% 254,200
 229,903
 11 %

As of December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, we had 377, 355404, 415 and 619377 full-time employees, respectively.  The following table reflects full-time employees as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 by department.department:
Years Ended December 31,
December 31, 201920182017
2017 2016 2015
Origination and Servicing163
 151
 221
Origination and Servicing145  160  163  
Sales and Marketing13
 28
 115
Sales and Marketing17  17  13  
General and Administrative - Research and Development81
 78
 133
General and Administrative - Research and Development101  97  81  
General and Administrative - Other120
 98
 150
General and Administrative - Other141  141  120  
Total Headcount377
 355
 619
404  415  377  
Origination and Servicing
Origination and Servicing costs consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our credit,capital markets, collections, customer support and payment processing employees and vendor costs associated with facilitating and servicing Borrower Loans. The increasedecrease in 2017Origination and Servicing costs in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2016 of 3%2018 was primarily due to $1.8 million in increased amortization costs for internal use software and $1.9 million due to increased use of outsourced services. The increase was offset by a decrease in compensation costs of $2.9 million.not significant.
The increase in 2016the expense in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2015 of 9%2017 was primarily due to an increase in personnel related expenses of $2.0 million, as in the first half of the period Prosper expanded its verification and customer support teams to support the larger number of loans that were serviced and to support an anticipated future increase in loan application and processing volumes. Additionally, Prosper incurred an additional $1.0 million in costs relating to data services for the Prosper Daily application and $0.9 million in increased amortization costs for internal use software. These increases were offset by a $1.8 million decrease in outsourced customer support costs during the period.not significant.
44




Sales and Marketing
Sales and Marketing costs consist primarily of affiliate marketing, search engine marketing, online and offline campaigns, email marketing, public relations and direct mail marketing, as well as the compensation expenses such as wages, benefits and stock based compensation for the employees who support these activities. For the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to 2018, the year ended December 31, 2016, the increasedecrease of 19%$4.2 million, or 5%, was largely due to increased variable costs as Prosper increased its marketing efforts to increase demand from Borrowers given the greater availability of funding from investors. These


increases includeddriven by a $17.114.2 million, or 41% increase36%, decrease in direct mailing costs as Prosper increaseddecreased the volumesize of its direct mail campaigns,campaigns. This was partially offset by a $3.7$8.3 million or 38%33% increase in partnership costs as Prosper significantlysimultaneously increased its Sales and Marketing efforts through the partnership activities and a $3.9 million or 107% increase in online marketing costs. These increases were offset by a $7.8 million or 72% decrease in compensation costs as Prosper significantly reduced its sales and marketing headcount in 2016.channel.
For the year ended December 31, 20162018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the decrease in expense of 38% in expenses$5.5 million, or 7%, was largely due to decreased variable costs and a decrease in personnel as Prosper slowed its marketing efforts to reduce demand from Borrowers and maintain marketplace equilibrium due to decreases in investor demand through the Whole Loan Channel.costs. These decreases included a $9.2$20.2 million, or 18%34%, decrease in direct mailing costs as Prosper reducedwe decreased the volume of itsour direct mail campaigns,campaigns. This was partially offset by a $25.8$12.2 million, or 75% decrease92%, increase in partnership costs as Prosperwe significantly reducedincreased partnership activities, andas well as a $2.2$1.4 million, or 42% decrease18%, increase in online marketing costs as Prosper significantly reduced its efforts in this area. Compensation costs decreased during the year ended December 31, 2016 by $1.2 million or 10%. These reductions are not as large as the decrease in activity-based spending as Prosper increased sales and marketing headcount during the first four months of 2016 before making significant reductions in such headcount during the restructuring in May 2016.costs.
General and Administrative – Research and Development
General and Administrative Research and developmentDevelopment costs consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our engineering and product development employees and related vendor costs. The decreaseincrease in 2017General and Administrative Research and Development in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2016 of 38%2018 was primarily due to a decrease in compensation costs of $8.0 million and a decrease of $1.5 million due to lower contractor and consultant usage. Compensation costs decreased as a result of the decrease in headcount.not significant.
The increase in 2016expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 20152017 of 46%$0.7 million, or 4%, was primarily due to an increase in personnel-related expenses as we expanded our engineeringresearch and product development teams to support our continued investment in our marketplace. The increase for stock based compensation costs by $4.0 million or 156% was due to large grants to new employees who were granted options in late 2015 and due to additional expense as a result of the stock option reprice that occurred in May 2016. Salaries and wages for these employees increased 25% or $3.3$0.3 million as a result of increased employee levels for the first four months of 2016 before the restructuring that occurredan increase in May of 2016 that significantly lowered the employee levels.headcount.
General and Administrative – Other
General and administrative otherAdministrative Other expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our accounting and finance, risk, legal, human resources and facilities employees, professional fees related to legal and accounting and facilities expenses. The decrease in 2017General and Administrative - Other cost in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 20162018 was not significant.
The decrease General and Administrative - Other expenses in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 of 23%$4.0 million was primarily the result of a decrease in compensation expense of $11.3$1.9 million, a decrease in professional servicesdepreciation of $4.4Property and Equipment of $1.2 million and a decrease in rent and occupancy expensesamortization of $3.1intangibles of $1.0 million. TheCompensation costs decreased primarily because of a decrease in compensation expenses is the result of the reductionstock based compensation.
Change in headcount since the restructuring in May 2016. Rent and occupancy related expenses have decreased as Prosper has ceased the use of, subleased or terminated a number of leases for office space.
The increase in 2016 compared to 2015 of 12% was primarily due to an increase in personnel related expenses as Prosper had higher headcount levels in 2016 before the restructuring took place on May 3, 2016 and an increase in facilities expenses as Prosper obtained additional space to support the increased headcount. These headcount levels were subsequently reduced as part of the restructuring that occurred in May 2016.
Changes in the Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants
ChangesChange in the Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock warrantsWarrants increased $29.1$33.8 million in 2017 over 2016. The convertible preferred stock warrants were issued in late 2016 and over the course of 2017 andyear ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 primarily as a result there was limited changeof a decrease in the fair value of the underlying Convertible Preferred Stock compared to the decrease in 2016.2018. Gain in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants of $29.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 became losses of $45.0 million in 2018 due to a decrease in the fair value of the underlying Convertible Preferred Stock in 2018.
Restructuring Charges, Net
Restructuring costsCharges, Net consist of personnel and facilities related costs related to the strategic restructuring of the business that Prosperwere announced on May 3, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, thecosts were $34 thousand, $1.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The expenses relate toprimarily consist of adjustments to fair value of the existing liabilitiesrestructuring liability in 2018 and accretion expense on the remaining liability. The 2016 restructuring included the termination of certain employees in our Phoenix, Arizona and San Francisco, California locations and the closing of our Salt Lake City, Utah location. Personnel2017.

Other Expense (Income), Net

costs include employee severance and benefits for the termination of 167 employees. Facilities charges include estimated losses on the sublease and lease termination costs for properties in Phoenix, Salt Lake City and San Francisco. Additionally,Other Income, Net was $1.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2016, Prosper incurred additional restructuring expenses when it closed its office in Tel Aviv, Israelyear ended December 31, 2019 and ceased the use of leased office space in Delaware. The closure of the Tel Aviv office included the termination of 31 employees. Prosper did not incur restructuring costs in 2015.
Other
Other expenses consistprimarily consists of interest income contract terminationon Cash, Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. For the year ended December 31, 2018, Other Expenses, Net were $1.9 million and largely consisted of the $3.0 million of expense for the settlement with the SEC related to the annualized net return matter, offset by interest income on Available for Sale Investments securities. For more information on the SEC settlement costs, please refer to Note 19, Commitments and impairment charges on assets held for sale.Contingencies of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements. In the year ended December 31, 2017, managementOther Expenses were $7.4 million. We recorded an impairment charge of $6.4 million related to the intangible assetsIntangible Assets associated with the former Prosper Daily application and Prosperwe settled
45




certain rebates related to the purchase of whole loans by members of the Consortium prior to the closing of the Consortium transaction via the issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants at a loss of $1.5 million over the cash settlement amount. In 2016, Prosper negotiated the termination of a contract with Colchis Capital Management, L.P. ("Colchis"). In exchange for termination of the contract Prosper agreed to pay Colchis $9 million and issue a warrant to purchase shares of a new series of preferred stock representing 7% of Prosper's capitalization as of the date of issuance for $0.01 per share. The fair value of the warrants at the time of contract termination was $21.7 million. In 2015, no similar charges were incurred.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Core Revenue
Core Revenue is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as our Total Net Revenue adjusted to exclude the Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans. We believe it is useful to exclude the Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans from Total Net Revenue to derive a better measurement of our business performance. We believe that this adjustment also affords greater comparability to other marketplace lenders.
The underlying Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans relates to the Consortium Purchase Agreement. This agreement expired in May 2019 and we currently do not expect to sign a similar agreement to replace it. As a result, we believe that providing the Core Revenue metric that excludes the impact of Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans is useful to investors.
Core Revenue has limitations as a financial measure, should be considered as supplemental in nature, and is not meant as a substitute for Total Net Revenue which has been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These limitations include the following:
Core Revenue excludes Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans, which is our largest contra revenue item; and
Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Core Revenue differently or not at all, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Because of these limitations, you should consider Core Revenue alongside other financial performance measures, including Total Net Revenue and our financial results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The following table presents a reconciliation of Total Net Revenue to Core Revenue for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Total Net Revenues$153,570  $104,361  $116,235  
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(17,553) (72,316) (60,122) 
Core Revenue$171,123  $176,677  $176,357  

Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as Net Loss adjusted for interest income on availableAvailable for sale securitiesSale Investments and cashCash and cash equivalents, income tax expense,Cash Equivalents, SEC Settlement Costs, Income Tax Expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment of intangible assets,Intangible Assets, stock based compensation expense, fair valueFair Value of warrants vestedWarrants Vested on the saleSale of borrower loans, restructuring charges,Borrower Loans, Restructuring Charges, and fair value adjustments for warrant liabilities.Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. The presentation of non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP.
We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be a helpful indicator of the operational strength and performance of our business and a good measure of our historical operating trends. Management uses Adjusted EBITDA to, among other things, understand and compare operating results across accounting periods, evaluate our operations and financial performance and for internal planning and forecasting purposes. Inclusion of Adjusted EBITDA is intended to provide investors insight into the manner in which management views the performance of the Company, enhance investors’ evaluation of our operating results, and to facilitate meaningful comparisons of our results between periods. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, the GAAP financial information provided herein.
Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under USU.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
althoughAlthough depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements;
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
46




Adjusted EBITDA does not consider the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based charges;
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us; and
otherOther companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.
The major non-GAAP adjustments, and our basis for excluding them, are outlined below:
Fair value of warrants vested on the sale of borrower loansBorrower Loans and changechanges in the fair value of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock warrants liability. liability - We exclude these charges primarily because they are non-cash charges and the fair value varies based


on the fair value of the underlying preferred stock, varying valuation methodologies and subjective assumptions. ThisTheir inclusion makes the comparison of our current financial results to previous and future periods difficult to evaluate.
Stock-based compensation expense.expense - This consists of expenses for equity awards under our equity incentive plans. Although stock-based compensation is an important aspect of the compensation paid to our employees, the grant date fair value varies based on the stock price at the time of grant, varying valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types. This makes the comparison of our current financial results to previous and future periods difficult to evaluate;evaluate; therefore, we believe it is useful to exclude stock-based compensation. We also excluded these expenses because they are non-cash.
Amortization or impairment of acquired intangible assetsIntangible Assets and impairment of goodwill.Goodwill - We incur amortization or impairment of acquired intangible assetsIntangible Assets and goodwillGoodwill in connection with acquisitions and therefore exclude these amounts from our non-GAAP measures. We exclude these items because management does not believe they are reflective of our ongoing operating results.
Restructuring chargesCharges - We have incurred restructuring chargesRestructuring Charges that are included in our GAAP financial statements, related to workforce reductions and estimated costs of exitingexisting facility lease commitments due to our May 2016 restructuring. We exclude these items from our non-GAAP financial measures when evaluating our continuing business performance as such itemsthese costs do not reflect expected future operating expenses. In addition, these chargescosts do not necessarily provide meaningful insight into the fundamentals of current or historical operations of our business.
Contract termination charges - We have incurred contract termination charges that are included in ourSEC settlement costs. Our GAAP financial statements include settlement costs incurred for our settlement with the SEC related to a material contract termination.the annualized net return matter. We exclude this item from our non-GAAP financial measures when evaluating our continuing business performance as such items do not reflect expected future operating expenses. In addition, these charges do not necessarily provide meaningful insight into the fundamentals of current or historical operations of our business.

47




The following table presents a reconciliation of Net Loss to Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Net Loss$(13,711) $(39,945) $(115,158) 
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans17,553  72,316  60,122  
Depreciation expense:
    Servicing and Origination5,111  5,664  5,853  
    General & Administrative - Other2,286  3,926  5,110  
Amortization of Intangibles279  378  1,385  
Impairment of Intangibles—  —  6,399  
Stock-based Compensation4,528  8,401  12,238  
Restructuring Charges34  1,762  1,340  
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(11,235) (45,003) 29,140  
Interest Income on Available for Sale Securities, Cash and Cash Equivalents(1,025) (1,223) (461) 
SEC Settlement Costs3,000  —  
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)100  172  (508) 
     Adjusted EBITDA$3,920$9,448  $5,460  
 Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net Loss$(115,158) $(118,741) $(25,968)
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans60,122
 
 
Depreciation expense:     
    Servicing and Origination5,853
 4,083
 3,161
    General & Administration - Other5,110
 5,298
 2,919
Amortization of Intangibles1,385
 3,838
 1,569
Impairment of Intangibles6,399
 
 
Stock-based Compensation12,238
 19,787
 13,011
Restructuring Charges1,340
 17,027
 
Change in the Fair Value of Warrants29,140
 7
 
Interest Income on Available for Sale Securities, Cash and Cash Equivalents(461) (547) (177)
Contract Termination
 30,711
 
Income Tax Expense(508) 546
 340
Adjusted EBITDA$5,460
 $(37,991) $(5,145)



Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations include the following amount of stock basedstock-based compensation for the periods presented (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Servicing and Origination$417  $911  $996  
Sales and Marketing243  451  553  
General & Administrative3,868  7,039  10,689  
     Total Stock-Based Compensation$4,528  $8,401  $12,238  
48

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Origination and servicing$996
 $2,004
 $1,231
Sales and marketing553
 2,914
 2,561
General and administrative10,689
 14,824
 9,219
Restructuring
 45
 
Total stock based compensation$12,238
 $19,787
 $13,011





Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited consolidated statement of operations data for each of the eight quarters ended December 31, 2017.2019. The unaudited quarterly statement of operations data set forth below have been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are necessary for a fair statement of the unaudited quarterly statement of operations data. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future operating results. The following quarterly consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information):
Three Months Ended
December 31,
2019
September 30,
2019
June 30,
2019
March 31,
2019
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net$26,646  $32,466  $33,876  $26,294  
Servicing Fees, Net5,866  6,165  5,172  6,202  
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans2,112  2,577  3,559  2,697  
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans—  —  (7,805) (9,747) 
Other Revenues1,121  1,608  2,188  1,036  
Total Operating Revenues35,745  42,816  36,990  26,482  
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale29,702  29,113  23,543  18,428  
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments(17,632) (17,339) (15,645) (13,120) 
     Net Interest Income12,070  11,774  7,898  5,308  
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(10,613) (11,229) (1,958) (1,713) 
Total Net Revenues37,202  43,361  42,930  30,077  
Expenses
Origination and Servicing8,863  8,464  9,427  8,161  
Sales and Marketing15,549  20,484  21,450  16,341  
General and Administrative16,702  18,195  17,908  18,768  
Restructuring Charges, Net(45)   82  
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(2,346) (14,217) (4,729) 10,058  
Other Expense, Net(337) (370) (591) (648) 
Total Expenses38,386  32,563  43,470  52,762  
Net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes(1,184) 10,798  (540) (22,685) 
Income Tax Expense13  29  29  29  
Net Income (Loss)$(1,197) $10,769  $(569) $(22,714) 
Plus: Return from shareholders on share repurchase1,066  —  —  —  
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$(131) $10,769  $(569) $(22,714) 
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Basic$—  $0.04  $(0.01) $(0.32) 
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Diluted—  0.01  (0.01) (0.32) 
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic70,449,182  70,606,805  70,502,797  70,487,006  
Weighted-Average Shares - Diluted70,449,182  285,810,755  70,502,797  70,487,006  

49




Three Months Ended
Quarters Ended
December 31,
2017
September 30, 2017
June 30,
2017
March 31, 2017
December 31,
2018
September 30,
2018
June 30,
2018
March 31,
2018
Revenues Revenues
Operating Revenues Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net$30,632
$37,250
$35,423
$26,869
Transaction Fees, Net$25,806  $28,225  $37,988  $31,354  
Servicing Fees, Net7,284
6,976
6,793
6,154
Servicing Fees, Net7,017  7,339  7,487  7,184  
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans3,574
4,373
3,803
(318)
Gain on Sale of Borrower LoansGain on Sale of Borrower Loans2,496  3,139  4,163  3,350  
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans

(18,157)(21,772)(16,887)(3,307)Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(16,844) (19,561) (20,633) (15,279) 
Other Revenues1,280
1,390
1,415
720
Other Revenues878  1,453  1,015  1,352  
Total Operating Revenues24,613
28,217
30,547
30,118
Total Operating Revenues19,353  20,595  30,020  27,961  
Interest Income Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans11,636
12,065
12,007
11,499
Interest Expense on Notes(10,851)(11,247)(11,177)(10,678)
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for SaleInterest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale15,711  15,088  14,556  12,360  
Interest Expense on Financial InstrumentsInterest Expense on Financial Instruments(11,914) (11,772) (11,471) (10,729) 
Net Interest Income785
818
830
821
Net Interest Income3,797  3,316  3,085  1,631  
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(317)(173)70
(94)
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, NetChange in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(1,595) (3,229) (1,430) 858  
Total Net Revenues25,081
28,862
31,447
30,845
Total Net Revenues21,555  20,682  31,675  30,450  
Expenses Expenses
Origination and Servicing8,341
9,263
8,873
8,404
Origination and Servicing8,790  8,313  9,192  8,821  
Sales and Marketing21,829
21,947
20,131
19,555
Sales and Marketing14,849  23,415  20,907  18,828  
General and Administrative18,088
18,123
18,758
20,717
General and Administrative17,439  18,066  18,151  18,715  
Restructuring Charges, Net682
86
647
(75)Restructuring Charges, Net950  218  271  323  
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants


6,323
22,416
401
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(27,119) (9,283) (3,998) (4,604) 
Other Expenses, Net(213)(25)1,930
5,700
Other Expenses (Income), NetOther Expenses (Income), Net2,668  (276) (258) (242) 
Total Expenses48,727
55,717
72,755
54,702
Total Expenses17,577  40,453  44,265  41,841  
Net Loss Before Taxes(23,646)(26,855)(41,308)(23,857)
Net Income (Loss) Before Income TaxesNet Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes3,978  (19,771) (12,590) (11,391) 
Income Tax Expense(854)85
97
164
Income Tax Expense145    10  
Net Loss Applicable to Common Shareholders$(22,792)$(26,940)$(41,405)$(24,021)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted$(0.33)$(0.39)$(0.59)$(0.35)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted70,058,880
69,811,534
69,691,841
69,178,049
Net Income (Loss)Net Income (Loss)3,833  (19,779) (12,599) (11,401) 
Less: Net Income Allocated to Participating SecuritiesLess: Net Income Allocated to Participating Securities$(3,234) 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common StockholdersNet Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders$599  $(19,779) $(12,599) $(11,401) 
Net Income Per Share – BasicNet Income Per Share – Basic$0.01  $(0.28) $(0.18) $(0.16) 
Net Income Per Share – DilutedNet Income Per Share – Diluted$0.01  $(0.28) $(0.18) $(0.16) 
Weighted-Average Shares - BasicWeighted-Average Shares - Basic70,384,501  70,394,269  70,362,716  70,302,910  
Weighted-Average Shares - DilutedWeighted-Average Shares - Diluted110,584,811  70,394,269  70,362,716  70,302,910  



Quarters EndedDecember 31, 2016September 30, 2016
June 30,
2016
March 31, 2016
Revenues    
Operating Revenues    
Transaction Fees, Net$19,944
$14,086
$19,276
$41,824
Servicing Fees, Net7,004
7,079
7,676
7,144
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(228)761
(687)3,791
Other Revenues683
973
816
2,773
Total Operating Revenues27,403
22,899
27,081
55,532
Interest Income    
Interest Income on Borrower Loans10,939
11,735
11,192
10,783
Interest Expense on Notes(10,731)(10,636)(10,098)(9,722)
Net Interest Income208
1,099
1,094
1,061
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(245)(47)(2)(78)
Total Net Revenues27,366
23,951
28,173
56,515
Expenses    
Origination and Servicing7,029
7,633
8,833
10,449
Sales and Marketing15,732
9,391
12,303
32,720
General and Administrative18,851
24,740
28,499
30,645
Restructuring Charges, Net

3,436
(470)14,061

Other Expenses, Net30,348



Total Expenses75,396
41,294
63,696
73,814
Net Loss Before Taxes(48,030)(17,343)(35,523)(17,299)
Income Tax Expense202
74
105
165
Net Loss Applicable to Common Shareholders$(48,232)$(17,417)$(35,628)$(17,464)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted$(0.71)$(0.27)$(0.56)$(0.29)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted67,713,630
65,393,175
63,270,058
60,357,488

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity needs are generally met through cash generated from Transaction Fees, Servicing Fees, proceeds from the sales of loans and investments, and draws on our Warehouse Lines.

The following table sets forth our liquidity and capital resources (in thousands):
50




 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net Loss$(115,158) $(118,741) $(25,968)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities1,081
 (62,667) 5,444
Net cash used in investing activities(28,085) (21,542) (174,213)
Net cash provided by financing activities50,462
 40,251
 184,507
Net Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents23,458
 (43,958) 15,738
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period22,337
 66,295
 50,557
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period$45,795
 $22,337
 $66,295
Year Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Net Loss$(13,711) $(39,945) $(115,158) 
Net cash used in operating activities$(68,078) $(176,482) $(10,789) 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities96,480  23,611  (27,454) 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(15,053) 161,467  50,462  
Net increase in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash13,349  8,596  12,219  
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the beginning of the period207,059  198,463  186,244  
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the end of the period$220,408  $207,059  $198,463  

Net cash increased by $13.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, based on the following components:
Operating Activities. $68.1 million in cash was used in operating activities primarily driven by $79.0 million net purchase of Loans Held for Sale. The net loss of $13.7 million was offset by $24.6 million of non-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities.
Investing Activities. $96.5 million in cash was provided by investing activities primarily due to principal payment of Borrower Loans in the amount of $254.8 million, which was offset by purchase of Borrower Loans of $170.3 million.
Financing Activities. $15.1 million in cash was used in financing activities and primarily represents net proceeds from Warehouse Lines of $128.1 million, which was offset by payments on Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust.
Net cash increased by $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, based on the following components:
Operating Activities. $176.5 million in cash was used in operating activities primarily driven by $186.9 million net purchase of Loans Held for Sale. The net loss of $39.9 million was offset by $50.4 million of non-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities.
Investing Activities. The $23.6 million in cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to the maturities of Available for Sale Investments exceeding purchases of $31.5 million, offset by property plant and equipment purchases of $5.9 million.
Financing Activities. The $161.5 million in cash provided by financing activities was primarily the result of proceeds from the PWIT Warehouse Line.
Net cash increased by $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, based on the following components:
Operating Activities. $10.8 million of cash used in operating activities primarily due to cash held on the $50platform by investors that is classified as Restricted Cash.
Investing Activities. $27.5 million ($47.9in cash was used in investing activities primarily due to a net purchase of Available for Sale Investments of $20.4 million netand Property and Equipment purchased of fees)$4.2 million.
Financing Activities. $50.5 million in cash was provided by financing activities primarily as the result of $47.9 million raised through the sale of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock and $7.1 million of net income, net of non-cash items.  This was offset by net purchases of availableStock.
Prosper did not hold Available for sale securities of $20.4 million, $2.3 million reduction in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, $3.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and a $3.0 million scheduled payment to reduce our settlement liability.


Net cash decreasedSale Investments for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the $54.4 million loss, net of non-cash items, $10.0 million for purchase of Property and Equipment, an additional $7.2 million for investing activity restricted cash which includes $5.5 million in additional collateral for WebBank, a $5 million payment for the BillGuard contingent liability and a $3 million scheduled payment to reduce our settlement liability. These decreases are offset by net proceeds from available for sale securities being converted to cash of $40.3 million. Net cash used in investing primarily represents acquisitions of Borrower Loans (excluding acquisition of Borrower Loans sold to unrelated third parties, which is included in cash flow from operations along with the corresponding proceeds from sale of Borrower Loans), offset by repayment of Borrower Loans and $40.3 million of available for sale securities that have been converted into cash. Net cash provided by financing activities primarily represents proceeds from the issuance of Notes, partially offset by payments on Notes. In the year ended December 31, 2015 cash provided by financing activities consisted primarily of $165 million ($164.8 million net of fees) raised through the issuance of Series D preferred convertible shares, which was offset by $29.2 million paid to repurchase common stock from certain employees.
Prosper also has available for sale securities that are available for its liquidity needs. The fair value of securities available for sale as of December 31, 2017 was $53.1 million.2019. As a result, the total cash, cash equivalentsCash, Cash Equivalents and availableAvailable for sale investmentsSale Investments available to Prosper at December 31, 20172019 for its liquidity needs was $98.9$64.6 million. At December 31, 2017, the available for sale securities included Treasury Bills and US Treasury securities. All securities were rated investment grade (defined as a rating equivalent to a Moody’s rating of “Baa3” or higher, or a Standard & Poor’s rating of “BBB-” or higher) and there were no significant unrealized losses. These securities continue to be available to meet liquidity needs.

We believe our cashliquidity needs are generally met through transaction fees, servicing fees, proceeds from sales of loans and equivalents, together with available for sale investmentssecuritization transactions, draws on Warehouse Lines, and cash flows from operations, will be sufficient to meet our operatingCash and liquidity requirements for at least the next twelve months.Cash Equivalents. However, if the financial results anticipated are not achieved, our current cash and equivalents and available for sale investmentssources of liquidity may not be sufficient to meet our operating and liquidity requirements for at least the next twelve months without obtaining additional sources of liquidity which may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our future operating and liquidity requirements will depend on numerous factors, including without limitation, future results of operations and our continued ability to attract borrowers and investors to our platform. If we are unable to generate positive cash flow from operations or to obtain funds from additional sources, this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
51




Income Taxes
We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by applying the statutory tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences between the financial reporting and tax filing bases of existing assets and liabilities are expected to reverse. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Based on the weight of available evidence, which includes our historical operating performance and the reported cumulative net losses in prior years, we have provided a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets.
We report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. We are required to make subjective assumptions and judgments regarding our income tax exposures. Interpretations and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time. As such, changes in our subjective assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations.
Given our history of operating losses, it is difficult to accurately forecast when and in what amounts future results will be affected by the realization, if any, of the tax benefits of future deductions for our net operating loss carry-forwards. Based on the weight of available evidence, which includes our historical operating performance and the reported cumulative net losses in prior years, we have provided a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As a result of retaining servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, we are a variablean interest holder in certain special purpose entities that purchase these Borrower Loans. None of these special purpose entities are consolidated as we are not the primary beneficiary. Other than these special purpose entities, as of December 31, 2019, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities that were established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other purposes.


Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2017,2019, the following table summarizes our contractual obligations and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands):
Payments Due by Period
TotalLess Than 1 Year1 - 3 Years3 - 5 YearsMore Than 5 Years
Operating lease obligations$19,633  $5,236  $10,144  $2,433  $1,820  
WebBank purchase obligations18,617  18,617  —  —  —  
Total contractual obligations$38,250  $23,853  $10,144  $2,433  $1,820  
 Payments Due by Period
 TotalLess Than 1 Year1 - 3 Years3 - 5 YearsMore Than 5 Years
Operating lease obligations, net of minimum sublease rentals$31,580
$4,529
$10,580
$10,869
$5,602
WebBank purchase obligations29,322
29,322



Total contractual obligations$60,902
$33,851
$10,580
$10,869
$5,602

WebBank Purchase Obligations
Under our loan account program with WebBank, a Utah-charted industrial bank that serves as our primary issuing bank, WebBank retains ownership of loans facilitated through our marketplace for two business days after origination. As part of this arrangement, we have committed to purchase the loans at the conclusion of the two business days.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting policies discussed below reflect our most significant judgments, assumptions and estimates which we believe are critical in understanding and evaluating our reported financial results including: (i) fair value measurement of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Notes;Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust; (ii) stock-based compensation expense;Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities and (iii) loan servicing assets and liabilities; (iv) consolidationfair value measurement of variable interest entities;  (v) valuation of goodwill and intangible assets; (vi) impairment of goodwill and intangible assets and (vii) convertible preferred stock warrant liability.Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. These judgments, estimates and assumptions are inherently subjective in nature and actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, and the differences could be material. For a full description of all accounting policies adopted by us, please see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
Valuation of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes and NotesCertificates Issued by Securitization Trust
Borrower Loans are funded through either the Note Channel or the Whole Loan Channel. Through the Note Channel, we issue Notes and purchase Borrower Loans from WebBank, and hold the associated Borrower Loans until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notes issued through the Note Channel is conditioned upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loan. We have elected fair value accounting forLoans.
In 2019, Prosper began financing the purchase of Borrower Loans originated through the NoteWhole Loan Channel through securitization transactions, which issued senior notes, risk retention interests, and the related Notes. The fair value election for these Borrower Loansresidual certificates. Associated securitization trusts are deemed consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”), and Notes allows for the use of the same measurement approach for both Borrower Loans and the related Notes, consistent with the borrower payment dependent design of such Notes. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful for the readers of the financial statements and it allows bothas a result the Borrower Loans originatedheld in the securitization trusts are included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value”, notes sold to third party investors in “Notes Issued by Securitization
52




Trust”, and the risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 7 - Securitization of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Prosper uses Warehouse Lines to purchase Loans Held for Sale that may subsequently be contributed to securitization transactions or sold to investors through the Whole Loan Channel. Loans Held for Sale are included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note Channel and11 - Debt of the related Notesaccompanying notes to be valued using the same methodology. A specific allowance account is not recorded relating to the Borrower Loans in which we havePMI’s consolidated financial statements for more details on Warehouse Lines.
Prosper has elected the fair value option but rather wefor Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans funded through the Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of the Notes due to their borrower payment-dependent structure. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans held in consolidated securitization trusts are partially offset by changes in fair value of the Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. Changes in fair value of Loans Held for Sale are not offset by changes in the carrying value of Warehouse Lines as they are carried at amortized cost. Prosper earns interest income from loans held in securitization and warehouse trusts and record changes in their fair value through earnings. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust are included in “Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologies adjusted forCertificates Issued by Securitization Trust. The key assumptions used in the expected payment, lossvaluation include default rates and recovery rates.prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
Valuation of Loan Servicing Asset and Liability
We estimate therecord loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities at their estimated fair values of Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and the related Notes using a discounted cash flow valuation methodology. The valuation methodology considers projected prepayments and uses the historical defaults, losses and recoveries onwhen we sell Borrower Loans to project future losses and net cash flowsunrelated third-party buyers. The gain or loss on such Borrower Loans.
We includea loan sale is recorded in earnings the estimated unrealized fair value gains or losses during the period of Borrower Loans, and the offsetting estimated fair value gains or losses“Gain on the related Notes in the period in which such changes in fair value occurs.  
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans


Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower LoansLoans” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations includeswhile the fair value of Series Fthe servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing fee is recorded in Servicing Assets or Liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in Servicing Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We have elected to adopt the fair value method to measure the Servicing Assets and Liabilities for all classes of Servicing Assets and Liabilities subsequent to initial recognition.
We use a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that we earn on the Borrower Loans, the estimated market Servicing Fees to service such loans, the prepayment rates, the default rates, discount rate and the current principal balances of the loans.
Valuation of Convertible Preferred Stock warrants that have vested during the period. These warrants relate toWarrants
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants primarily consist of warrants to purchase Series F Convertible Preferred Stock issued to the Consortium that vestvested when the Consortium purchasespurchased whole loans under the Consortium Purchase Agreement, that was signedwhich ended in February 2017.May 2019. On vesting of the Series F warrants,Warrants, Prosper records a liability as "ConvertibleConvertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability"Liability on the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets at fair value and a corresponding amount as "Fair“Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans"Loans” on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations as contra-revenue.Operations. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the vested warrants are recorded in “Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We estimate the fair value of the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrantsWarrants using valuation methods appropriate for the circumstances at the time of vesting. Generally, this includes determining the business enterprise value of the Company using methods that may include recent transactions in the Company's stockdiscounted cash flow model, comparable public company analysis, and market indicators.comparable acquisition analysis. Once the business enterprise value has been estimated, an option pricing model is used to allocate the value to the various classes of Prosper's equity. The concluded per share value for the Series F convertible preferred stock warrantConvertible Preferred Stock Warrant is then determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation includes expense associated with stock option grants and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Stock-based compensation for stock options is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. As a result, we estimate the amount of stock-based compensation we expect to be forfeited based on our historical experience. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from our estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted.
Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the grant date fair value of options using an option-pricing model is affected by our assumptions regarding a number of variables including the fair value of our common stock, our expected common stock price volatility over the expected life of the options, expected term of the stock option, risk-free interest rates and expected dividends.
Loan Servicing Asset and Liability
We record loan servicing assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values when we sell Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in “Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans” on the consolidated statement of operations while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing fee is recorded in servicing assets or liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in “Servicing Assets” and “Other Liabilities,” respectively, on the consolidated balance sheet.
On January 1, 2015, we elected to adopt the fair value method to measure the servicing assets and liabilities for all classes of servicing assets and liabilities subsequent to initial recognition. Prior to January 1, 2015, we measured the servicing assets and liabilities using the amortized cost method.
We use a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan servicing assets or liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that we earn on the Borrower Loans, estimated market servicing fees to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and the current principal balances of the loans.
53


Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
The determination of whether to consolidate a variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which we have a variable interest requires a significant amount of analysis and judgment whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE via a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest in a VIE exists if we have both the power to direct the VIE’s activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and a potentially significant economic interest in the VIE. The determination of whether an entity is a VIE considers factors, such as (i) whether the entity’s equity investment at risk is insufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) when a holder’s equity investment at risk lacks any of the following characteristics of a controlling financial interest: the direct or indirect ability through voting


rights or similar rights to make decisions about a legal entity’s activities that have a significant effect on the entity’s success, the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the legal entity. 
As a result of the nature of the retained servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, we are a variable interest holder in certain special purposes entities that purchase these Borrower Loans.   For all of these entities we either do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance or we do not have a potentially significant economic interest in the VIE.   In no case are we the primary beneficiary and as a result none of these entities are consolidated on our consolidated financial statements.  
Management regularly reviews and reconsiders its previous conclusions regarding the status of an entity as a VIE and whether we are required to consolidate such VIE in the consolidated financial statements.
Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
When we acquire businesses, we allocate the purchase price to the tangible assets, liabilities and identifiable intangible assets acquired. Any residual purchase price is recorded as goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price requires management to make significant estimates in determining the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities, especially with respect to intangible assets. These estimates are based on information obtained from management of the acquired companies, market participant data, and historical experience. These estimates can include, but are not limited to:
the time and expenses that would be necessary to recreate the asset;
the profit margin a market participant would receive;
cash flows that an asset is expected to generate in the future; and
discount rates.
These estimates are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. A change in these estimates could impact our allocation of purchase price to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill based on updated estimate information or facts and circumstances existing as of the acquisition date. Following the earlier of (1) receipt of all necessary information to determine the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, or (2) the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings.
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually in the third quarter, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. Triggering events that may indicate impairment include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in customer demand or business climate that could affect the value of goodwill or a significant decrease in expected cash flows. During the periods presented no reporting units were at risk of failing step one of the impairment analysis.
Intangible assets consist of identifiable intangible assets, primarily developed technology and customer lists, resulting from our acquisitions. Acquired intangible assets are recorded at cost, net of accumulated amortization. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line or accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives. Long-lived assets, including intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.

PROSPER FUNDING LLC
This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report


on Form 10-K for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Prosper Funding’s historical financial statements and related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and Prosper Funding’s actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those included in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Overview
Prosper Funding was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with PMI as its sole equity member being PMI.member. Prosper Funding was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and issue related Notes. Although Prosper Funding is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper Funding has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. Prosper Funding’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. Prosper Funding seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and by implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct corporate entity from PMI.
PFL formed PAH in November 2013 asAs a limited liability company with the sole equity member being PFL. PAH was formedcredit marketplace, we believe our customers are more highly susceptible to purchase certain Borrower Loans from PFLuncertainties and sell them to certain participantsnegative trends, real or perceived, in the Whole Loan Channel.
markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate in our marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Results of Operations
Overview
The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s net income for the years ended December 31, 2017 ,2019, December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 2015(in2017 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
20192018% Change20182017% Change
Total Net Revenue$73,562  $78,107  (6)%$78,107  $81,682  (4)%
Total Expenses67,620  77,228  (12)%77,228  76,841  %
Net Income$5,942  $879  576 %$879  $4,841  (82)%
 
Year Ended
December 31,
        
 2017 2016 % Change 2016 2015 % Change
Total Net Revenue$81,682
 $72,439
 13 % 72,439
 93,053
 (22)%
Total Expenses76,841
 99,623
 (23)% 99,623
 67,718
 47 %
Net Income (Loss)$4,841
 $(27,184) (118)% (27,184) 25,335
 (207)%

Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $9.22019 decreased $4.5 million, a 13% increase6% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, primarily due to the increaseddecreased number of loan listings on the marketplace during 2017,the period, which resulted in increaseddecreased administration fee revenue for the listing driven portion of the administrationsuch fee. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172019 decreased $22.8$9.6 million, a 23%12% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, primarily due to the non-recurring $30.7 million Colchis contract termination charge incurred in 2016 described in other expenses below.decreased origination volume of Borrower Loans and lower administration fee per loan listing during the current period. Net income for the year ended December 31, 20172019 increased $32.0$5.1 million, a 118%an 576% increase from the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, primarily due to the contract termination charge not recurring in 2017 and higher loan listings on the marketplace.decreased expenses described above.
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 20162018 decreased $20.6$3.6 million, a 22%4% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to decreased loan listings which decreased the administrative fee revenue –related party. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $31.9 million, a 47% increase from the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, primarily due to the $30.7decreased number of loan listings on the marketplace during 2018, which resulted in decreased administration fee revenue for the listing-driven portion of the administration fee. Total expenses for 2018 increased $0.4 million, non-recurring Colchis contract termination charge describeda 1% increase from 2017, primarily due to an increase in other expenses below.administration fee expenses. Net income for the year ended December 31, 20162018 decreased $52.5$4.0 million, a 207%82% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, primarily due to the decrease in revenues and the non-recurring contract termination charge.decreased revenue described above.



54




Revenues
The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in(dollars in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 20192018% Change20182017% Change
Operating Revenues     
Administration Fee Revenue - Related Party$49,818  $105,709  (53)%$105,709  $101,500  %
Servicing Fees, Net26,368  27,943  (6)%$27,943  25,963  %
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(5,058) (58,027) 91 %$(58,027) (48,691) (19)%
Other Revenues155  270  (43)%$270  170  59 %
Total Operating Revenues71,283  75,895  (6)%75,895  78,942  (4)%
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans$41,146  $43,569  (6)%$43,569  47,208  (8)%
Interest Expense on Notes$(38,492) $(40,656) %$(40,656) (43,954) (8)%
     Net Interest Income2,654  2,913  (9)%2,913  3,254  (10)%
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(375) (701) 47 %$(701) (514) 36 %
Total Revenues$73,562  $78,107  (6)%$78,107  $81,682  (4)%
 Year ended December 31,        
 2017 2016 % Change 2016 2015 % Change
Revenues 
  
  
  
    
Operating Revenues 
  
  
  
    
Administration Fee Revenue - Related Party$101,500
 $36,630
 177 % $36,630
 57,919
 (37)%
Servicing Fees, Net25,963
 28,604
 (9)% $28,604
 16,218
 76 %
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(48,691) 3,637
 (1,439)% $3,637
 14,151
 (74)%
Other Revenues170
 478
 (64)% $478
 1,500
 (68)%
Total Operating Revenues78,942
 69,349
 14 % $69,349
 89,788
 (23)%
Interest Income on Borrower Loans$47,208
 $44,649
 6 % $44,649
 41,380
 8 %
Interest Expense on Notes$(43,954) $(41,187) 7 % $(41,187) (38,174) 8 %
Net Interest Income3,254
 3,462
 (6)% $3,462
 3,206
 8 %
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(514) (372) 38 % $(372) 59
 (731)%
Total Revenues$81,682
 $72,439
 13 % $72,439
 93,053
 (22)%

Administration Fee Revenue - Related Party
Prosper Funding primarily generates revenue through license fees it earns under its Administration Agreement with PMI. The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by Prosper FundingPFL to PMI that entitles PMI to use the marketplace for, and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank under the Loan Account Program Agreement. Effective July 1, 2016 theThe Administration Agreement was amended. The amendments included amendingrequires PMI to pay PFL a monthly license fee that is partially based on the License Fee to includenumber of loan listings posted on the marketplace in that month, as well as a fixed monthlyrebate fee alongside a reduced variable fee and the introduction of a Rebates Fee related tobased on rebates given to investors.investors as an incentive to purchase Borrower Loans from PFL. The decrease in Administrative Fee Revenue of $55.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018 was primarily due to fewer Consortium warrants vesting as the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 17 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements) ended in May 2019. The increase of $4.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 was primarily due to the result of an increaseincreased compensation for rebates in 2018, partially offset by a decrease in the listing driven portion of administration fees as a result of higher listings in 2017 and the above changes in the Administration Agreement, which was designed to compensate Prosper Funding for any rebates offered to whole loan investors. The decrease in the administration fee revenue in 2016 wasdue to lower listings on the result of lower listing volume during 2016.  The decrease in listings was the result of Prosper reducing marketing spend to reduce demand and maintain marketplace equilibrium.platform.  
Servicing Fee RevenueFees, Net
Prosper Funding earns a fee from investorsInvestors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper Funding through the Whole Loan Channel for servicing such loans on their behalf. Thetypically pay Prosper Funding a servicing fee compensates Prosper Funding for the costs it incurs in servicing these Borrower Loans, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Historically, the servicing fee has been generally set at 1% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the corresponding Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. For loans sold after August 1, 2016, the servicing fee has beenwhich is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the corresponding Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper Funding for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper Funding records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received. The decrease in servicing feesServicing Fees of $1.6 million in 2017the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 20162018 was primarily due to a lower outstanding Borrower Loan balance in the servicing pool. The increase in fees of $2.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 was due to an increase in collection fees during the decreaseperiod and growth in Borrowerthe average unpaid balance of Borrowers Loans being serviced as a result of the decrease in loan originations in 2016. The increase in servicing fees in 2016 was due to the increase in Borrower Loans being serviced as a result of the growth in sales of Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel in 2015  serviced.


Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans consists of net gainslosses on Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan Channel. The $53.0 million lower loss in 2017the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018 was due to an increase in rebates offered to certain whole loan investors to facilitate the sale of large volumes of Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel. The increase in rebates of $52.3 million is primarily due to fewer Consortium warrants issued byvesting as the Consortium Purchase Agreement ended in May 2019. The $9.3 million higher loss in the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 was primarily due to PMI in relationissuing more warrants to the agreement with the Consortium that was reached in 2017 that results in warrants for convertible preferred stock vesting as loans are purchased by the Consortium.
The decrease in 2016 was due to a decrease in volume originated through the platform as described previously and the related sales and rebates given to investors of $5.9 million in 2016 to encourage whole loan purchases. This compares to no rebates given to investors on purchase in 2015.
55


Other Revenues

Other revenuesRevenues
Other Revenues consists primarily of fees earned from facilitating securitizations for whole loan purchasers. The changeOther Revenues in the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 iswere not significant. The decrease in 2016 was due to less instances of whole loan purchasers securitizing loans in 2016 compared to 2015.
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes
Prosper Funding recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper Funding believes itthem to be collectable. Prosper Funding records interest expense on the corresponding Notes based on the contractual interest rates to the extent Prosper Funding believes they will be collectable. The interest rate charged on the Borrower Loans is generally 1% higher than the interest rate paid on the corresponding NoteNotes in order to compensate Prosper Funding for servicing the Borrower Loans.
Overall, the decreasedecreases in net interest income for 2017the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to 2016 was2018, and 2018 compared to 2017, were primarily driven by the decrease in volume of Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel. The increase in net interest income in 2016 was primarily driven by the increase in volume of Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel.
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net
The fair valueChange in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, are estimatedNet captures losses from a change in fair value estimates using discounted cash flow methodologies that are based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The mainkey assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notesin valuation include prepayment rates derived from historical prepayment rates for each credit grade, default rates derived from historical performance recovery rates and discount rates appliedthat reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in other financial instruments with similar characteristics. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans funded through the Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of the corresponding Notes due to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade.borrower payment-dependent structure. Loans Held for Sale are primarily comprised of Borrower Loans held for short durations and are recorded usingtheir valuation uses the same approach as the Borrower Loans.
The following table summarizes the fair value adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018 and 20152017 respectively (in thousands):
Year ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015201920182017
Borrower Loans$(25,552) $(25,934) $(21,594)Borrower Loans$(23,185) $(31,265) $(25,552) 
Loans Held for SaleLoans Held for Sale—  (10)  
Notes25,031
 25,569
 21,774
Notes22,810  30,574  25,031  
Loans Held for Sale7
 (7) (121)
Total$(514) $(372) $59
$(375) $(701) $(514) 
Expenses
The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018 and 20152017 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 20192018% Change20182017% Change
Administration Fee Expense – Related Party$62,575  $70,491  (11)%$70,491  $70,359  — %
Servicing5,012  6,140  (18)%6,140  6,103  %
General and Administrative33  597  (94)%597  379  58 %
$67,620  $77,228  (12)%$77,228  $76,841  %
 Year ended December 31,        
 2017 2016 % Change 2016 2015 % Change
Expenses           
Administration Fee Expense – Related Party$70,359
 $62,203
 13 % $62,203
 $62,786
 (1)%
Servicing6,103
 5,395
 13 % 5,395
 3,705
 46 %
General and Administrative379
 1,321
 (71)% 1,321
 1,227
 8 %
Other
 30,704
 (100)% 30,704
 
 100 %
Total Expenses$76,841
 $99,623
 (23)% $99,623
 $67,718
 47 %

Administration Fee Expense - Related Party
Pursuant to anthe Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages the marketplace on behalf of Prosper Funding. Accordingly, each month Prosper Funding is required to pay PMI (a) a corporate administration fee of $500,000 per month, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan originated through the marketplace, (c) 62.5% of all servicing feesServicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) all nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding. The increase in 2017 was duedecrease of Administration Fee expense of $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to higher fees paid on the origination of borrower loans due to the increase in origination volume. The decrease in 2016 in the administration fee expense2018 was primarily due to less loans being originated on the marketplace in 2016, resulting in decreased fees owedorigination volume of Borrower Loans and lower administration fee per loan listing during the current period. The change for the year ended December 31, 2018 was not significant compared to PMI by Prosper Funding.2017.
Servicing
Servicing costs consist primarily of vendor costs and depreciation of internal use software costs associated with servicing Borrower Loans. The increasedecrease in Servicing costs of $1.1 million, or 18% for 2017the year ended December 31, 2019
56




compared to 2018 was primarily due to an increasea decrease in depreciation and amortization of internal use software.expense. The increasechange in 2016servicing costs for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 was primarily due to an increase in loan processing costs which was driven by higher loan volumes being serviced.not significant.
General and Administrative
General and administrativeAdministrative costs consist primarily of bank service charges and professional fees. The decreaseGeneral and Administrative costs decreased in 2017 wasthe year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 by $0.6 million, or 94%, primarily due to a decreasereduction in outsourced costs. The increasebank charges. Costs increased in 2016 wasthe year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 by $0.2 million, or 58%, primarily due to an increase in bank charges that were incurred with the increased transaction volume.
Other
Other expenses consist of contract terminationoutsourced costs. In November 2016, PMI and Prosper Funding, negotiated the termination of a contract with Colchis Capital Management, L.P. ("Colchis"). In exchange for termination of the contract, PMI, on behalf of Prosper Funding, agreed to pay Colchis $9 million and issue a warrant to purchase shares of a new series of preferred stock representing 7% of PMI's capitalization as of the date of issuance for $0.01 per share. The fair value of the warrants at the time of contract termination was $21.7 million. The total of the cash payment and the fair value of the warrants that PMI issued was recorded in Other expenses. Prosper Funding does not expect to incur similar contract termination charges in the future.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth ourthe unaudited consolidated statement of operations data for each of the eight quarters ended December 31, 2017.2019. The unaudited quarterly statement of operations data set forth below have been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are necessary for a fair statement of the unaudited quarterly statement of operations data. Our historicalHistorical results are not necessarily indicative of our future operating results. The following quarterly consolidated financial data should be


read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information)(in thousands):
Three Months Ended
December 31,
2019
September 30, 2019June 30,
2019
March 31,
2019
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$7,349  $8,854  $16,640  $16,975  
Servicing Fees, Net7,019  6,473  6,231  6,645  
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans2,667  3,155  (4,053) (6,827) 
Other Revenues56  56  (14) 57  
Total Operating Revenues17,091  18,538  18,804  16,850  
Interest Income on Borrower Loans10,108  10,304  10,403  10,331  
Interest Expense on Notes(9,461) (9,647) (9,735) (9,649) 
     Net Interest Income647  657  668  682  
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(36) (120) (131) (87) 
Total Net Revenues17,702  19,075  19,341  17,445  
Expenses
Administration Fee – Related Party14,730  16,079  16,773  14,991  
Servicing1,462  1,178  1,304  1,067  
General and Administrative(133) 38  34  96  
Total Expenses16,059  17,295  18,111  16,154  
Net Income$1,643  $1,780  $1,230  $1,291  

57




Three Months Ended
Quarters EndedDecember 31, 2017September 30, 2017June 30, 2017March 31, 2017
December 31,
2018
September 30, 2018June 30,
2018
March 31,
2018
Revenues Revenues
Operating Revenues Operating Revenues
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party26,840
32,198
27,309
15,153
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$23,956  $27,135  $30,836  $23,783  
Servicing Fees, Net6,937
6,626
6,520
5,879
Servicing Fees, Net6,826  7,098  7,209  6,812  
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(14,583)(17,399)(13,084)(3,625)Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(13,892) (16,379) (16,181) (11,574) 
Other Revenues60
45
34
32
Other Revenues65  70  73  63  
Total Operating Revenues19,254
21,470
20,779
17,439
Total Operating Revenues16,955  17,924  21,937  19,084  
Interest Income on Borrower Loans11,637
12,066
12,007
11,499
Interest Income on Borrower Loans10,771  10,939  10,907  10,951  
Interest Expense on Notes(10,853)(11,247)(11,177)(10,678)Interest Expense on Notes(10,059) (10,209) (10,177) (10,211) 
Net Interest Income784
819
830
821
Net Interest Income712  730  730  740  
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(317)(173)70
(94)
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, NetChange in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(87) (250) (255) (109) 
Total Net Revenues19,721
22,116
21,679
18,166
Total Net Revenues17,580  18,404  22,412  19,715  
Expenses Expenses
Administration Fee – Related Party17,000
19,078
18,466
15,815
Administration Fee – Related Party15,454  16,864  20,285  17,887  
Servicing1,296
1,553
1,524
1,730
Servicing1,628  1,036  1,663  1,814  
General and Administrative(125)186
145
173
General and Administrative135  97  182  183  
Total Expenses18,171
20,817
20,135
17,718
Total Expenses17,217  17,997  22,130  19,884  
Total Net Income1,550
1,299
1,544
448
Net Income (Loss)Net Income (Loss)$363  $407  $282  $(169) 

Quarters EndedDecember 31, 2016September 30, 2016June 30, 2016March 31, 2016
Revenues    
Operating Revenues    
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party8,753
5,530
6,930
15,417
Servicing Fees, Net6,955
7,026
7,589
7,034
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(228)761
(687)3,791
Other Revenues30
30
26
392
Total Operating Revenues15,510
13,347
13,858
26,634
Interest Income on Borrower Loans11,588
11,566
10,988
10,507
Interest Expense on Notes(10,731)(10,636)(10,098)(9,722)
Net Interest Income857
930
890
785
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(245)(47)(2)(78)
Total Net Revenues16,122
14,230
14,746
27,341
Expenses    
Administration Fee – Related Party13,701
12,243
15,652
20,607
Servicing1,258
1,374
1,536
1,227
General and Administrative245
342
380
357
Other30,701
   
Total Expenses45,905
13,959
17,568
22,191
Total Net Income(29,783)271
(2,822)5,150



Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table sets forth Prosper Funding's liquidity and capital resources (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Net Income$5,942  $879  $4,841  
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(12,819) $3,041  $3,285  
Net cash used in investing activities(11,219) (5,245) (6,645) 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(5,282) 1,070  (3,237) 
Net decrease in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash(29,320) (1,134) (6,597) 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the beginning of the period147,181  148,315  154,912  
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the end of the period$117,861  $147,181  $148,315  
 December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net Income$4,841
 $(27,184) $25,335
Net cash provided in operating activities14,508
 8,836
 34,174
Net cash used in investing activities(9,977) (52,242) (52,815)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(3,237) 35,309
 9,890
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents1,294
 (8,097) (8,751)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period6,929
 15,026
 23,777
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period$8,223
 $6,929
 $15,026

Net Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash decreased by $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, based on the following components:
Operating Activities. $12.8 million in cash was used in operating activities, primarily driven by less cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as Restricted Cash.
Investing Activities. $11.2 million net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to purchase of Property and Equipment of $6.4 million and Borrower Loans of $170.3 million, which was offset by $165.5 million principal payment of Borrower Loans.
Financing Activities. $5.3 million net cash was used in financing activities, primarily due to cash distributions to PMI in the amount of $9.0 million and payments on Notes of $167.4 million, which was partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of Notes of $171.1 million.
Net cash and cash equivalents increaseddecreased by $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Cash flows were positive2018, based on the following components:
58




Operating Activities. $3.0 million in cash was provided by operating activities primarily due to netdriven by less cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as Restricted Cash.
Investing Activities. $5.2 million in cash was used in investing activities primarily from the purchase of Property and Equipment of $3.3 million. Principal payments received on Borrower Loans exceeded purchases by $2.0 million.
Financing Activities. $1.1 million in cash was provided by proceeds from issuance of Notes of $176.8 million offset by $175.8 million payments on Notes.
Net cash and cash equivalents decreased by $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, based on the following components:
Operating Activities. $3.3 million in cash was provided by operating income of $8.9activities primarily driven by $4.8 million net income.
Investing Activities. $6.6 million in cash was used in investing activities, primarily from the purchase of non-cash items, this wasProperty and Equipment of $5.1 million and purchases of Borrower Loans exceeding principal payments by $2.8 million. These investing activities were offset by the maturation of $1.3 million of short-term investments.
Financing Activities. $3.2 million in cash was used in financing activities, primarily in the form of a $5.8 million cash distribution to the PMI. Net cash used in investing primarily represents acquisitions of Borrower Loans (excluding acquisition of Borrower Loans sold to unrelated third parties which is included in cash flow from operations along with the corresponding proceeds from sale of Borrower Loans),PMI, offset by repayment of Borrower Loans. Net cash provided by financing activities primarily represents proceeds from the issuance of Notes partially offsetexceeding payments thereon by payments on Notes and distributions to PMI.
Net cash and cash equivalents decreased for the year ended December 31, 2016. Cash flows were negative primarily due to a cash distribution to PMI of $8.5 million and purchases of property and equipment of $5.6 million, these were offset of net income of $3.5 million when excluding the non-cash loss on contract termination.$2.6 million.
Income Taxes
Prosper Funding incurred no income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 20172019, 2018 and 2016.2017. Prosper Funding is a USU.S. disregarded entity and the income and loss is included in the return of its parent PMI. Given PMI’s history of operating losses, it is difficult to accurately forecast how Prosper’s and Prosper Funding’s results will be affected by the realization and use of net operating loss carry forwards.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As a result of retaining servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, Prosper Funding is a variablean interest holder in certain special purpose entities that purchase these Borrower Loans. None of these special purpose entities are consolidated as Prosper Funding is not the primary beneficiary.
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, values, or future cash flows that may result from changes in financial market prices and interest rates.
Because balances,Through the Warehouse Lines we invest in Borrower Loans classified as held for sale. Investments in interest-earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Changes in U.S. interest rates and maturitiesaffect the market value of these Borrower Loans held on our balance sheet. Our future investment income may fall short of expectations, or we may suffer a loss in principal if we are forced to sell Borrower Loans, which have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates as stated above. Changes in the market value of Borrower Loans classified as held for sale are matched and offset by an equal balancerecorded on the Consolidated Statement of Notes with the exact same interest rates before our servicing fee and initial maturities, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the netOperations. The fair value of the combined Borrower LoanLoans Held for Sale was $142.0 million and Note portfolios$183.8 million as a result of changes in interest rates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The fair values of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, andNotes, Certificates Issued by the related NotesSecuritization Trust are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. Theassumptions such as default rate, prepayment rate and discount rate. Default rate, prepayment rate and discount rate may change due to expected loan performance or changes in the expected returns of similar financial instruments available in the market. We are exposed to the risk of decrease in the fair value of loans held in the warehouse and securitization trusts. For Borrower Loans and Notes presented on our Balance Sheet on behalf of our Note Channel investors, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans are largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and due to the total principal balances of the Borrower Loans being very close to the total principal balances of the Notes.

We are also exposed to variable interest rate risk under the debt from the Warehouse Lines, which had an outstanding balance of $131.6 million and $162.5 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. To reduce the impact of large fluctuations in interest rates, we hedged a portion of our interest rate risk by entering into a derivative agreement with a financial institution, which is currently out of the money. The derivative agreement that we use to manage the risk associated

59




with fluctuations in interest rates may not be able to eliminate the exposure to these changes. Interest rates are sensitive to numerous factors outside of our control, such as government and central bank monetary policy in the United States. Depending on the size of the exposures and the relative movements of interest rates, if we choose not to hedge or fail to effectively hedge our exposure, we could experience a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Prosper had cash and cash equivalents of $45.8$64.6 million and $57.9 million as of December 31, 2017,2019 and $22.3 million as of December 31, 2016.2018. These amounts were held in various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions and short-term, highly liquid marketable securities consisting primarily ofwhich may include money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasuryTreasury securities, and U.S. agency securities. Cash and cash equivalentsCash Equivalents are held for working capital purposes. Due to their short-term nature, Prosper believes that it does not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of these liquid investments as a result of changes in interest rates. Decreases in short-term interest rates will not materiallymoderately reduce interest income on these cashCash and cash equivalents because of the current low rate environment.Cash Equivalents. Increases in short-term interest rates will moderately increase the interest income earned on these cash balances.  the Cash and Cash Equivalents.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Prosper also holds availablemay hold Available for sale investments.Sale Investments. The fair value of Prosper’s availableAvailable for sale investmentSale Investment portfolio was $53.1 millionzero and $32.8$22.2 million as of December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively. These investments consisted of corporate debt securities, commercial paper, U.S. agency bonds, U.S. Treasury securitiesBills and short term bonds.U.S. Treasury securities. To mitigate the risk of loss, Prosper’s investment policy and strategy is focused first on the preservation of capital and supporting our liquidity requirements, and then to maximizing returns. To manage this risk, Prosper limits and monitors maturities, credit ratings and concentrations within the investment portfolio. Changes in U.S. interest rates affect the interest earned on Prosper’s availableAvailable for sale investmentsSale Investments and the market value of those investments.
The fair value of Available for Sale Investments is zero and $22.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in no change in the fair value of Prosper’s Available for Sale Investments as of December 31, 2019 and a decrease of approximately $40 thousand as of December 31, 2018. A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in no change in the fair value of Prosper’s Available for Sale Investments of December 31, 2019 and an increase of approximately $40 thousand as of December 31, 2018. Any realized gains or losses resulting from such interest rate changes would only be recorded if Prosper sold the investments prior to maturity and the investments were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
As more fully described in Note 8 - Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities of Prosper's financial statements attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the combined fair value of Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale is $776.0 million as of December 31, 2019, determined using a weighted-average discount rate of 7.00%. The combined fair value of Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale was $447.3 million as of December 31, 2018, determined using a weighted-average discount rate of 8.34%. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $0.3$7.1 million and $4.2 million in the fair value of Prosper’s availableinvestment in Borrower Loans and Loans Held for sale investmentsSale as of December 31, 2017,2019 and of approximately $0.1 million in the fair value of Prosper’s available for sale investments as of December 31, 2016.2018, respectively. A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in an increase of approximately $0.3$7.3 million and $4.4 million in the fair value of Prosper’s availableinvestment in Borrower Loans and Loans Held for sale investmentsSale as of December 31, 2017,2019 and of approximately $0.1 million in the fair value of Prosper’s available for sale investments as of December 31, 2016.2018, respectively. Any realized or unrealized gains or losses resulting from such interest rate changeschange would only be recorded in the consolidatedour statement of operations if so long as we hold these Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on our balance sheet.
Prosper soldFunding LLC
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, values, or future cash flows that may result from changes in financial market prices and interest rates.
Because balances, interest rates, and maturities of Borrower Loans are matched and offset by an equal balance of Notes with the exact same interest rates (net of our servicing fee) and initial maturities, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the net fair value of the combined Borrower Loan and Note portfolios as a result of changes in interest rates.
The fair values of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and the related Notes are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans are largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and due to the total principal balances of the Borrower Loans being very close to the total principal balances of the Notes.
Prosper Funding had Cash and Cash Equivalents of $7.5 million and $11.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These amounts were held in various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions and short term, highly liquid marketable securities which may include money market funds, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash and cash equivalents are held for working capital purposes. Due to their short-term nature, Prosper Funding believes that it does not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of these liquid investments prior to maturity oras a result of changes in interest
60




rates. Decreases in short-term interest rates will moderately reduce interest income on these Cash and Cash Equivalents, while increases in short-term interest rates will moderately increase the investments were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.interest income earned on these Cash and Cash Equivalent balances.



Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The supplementary financial information required by this Item 8 is included in Item 7 under the caption "Quarterly“Quarterly Results of Operations."
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, each Registrant’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of such Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer (PEO) and Principal Financial Officer (PFO), evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of such Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, as of December 31, 2017.2019. Based upon this evaluation, the PEO and the PFO of each Registrant have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to each Registrant and its subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed in reports filed with, or submitted to, the SEC under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including its PEO and PFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), each Registrant’s management is required to assess the effectiveness of such Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether such Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Management of each Registrant is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Each Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of such Registrant’s financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, internal control over financial reporting determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

61





The Registrants’ management has assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2019. In making this assessment the Registrants used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).” These criteria are in the areas of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Each Registrant’s assessment included documenting and evaluating the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, the person serving as each Registrant’s principal executive officerPEO and principal financial officerPFO has concluded that such Registrant’s internal controls were effective as of December 31, 2017.2019.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of 2017,2019, there were no changes in the internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act exempts any company that is not a “large accelerated filer” or an “accelerated filer” (as defined by SEC rules) from the requirement that such company obtain an external audit of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, the Registrants are exempt from the requirement that they include in their Annual Report on Form 10-K an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting by an independent registered public accounting firm; however, management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, is still required with respect to the Registrants.
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In connection with the preparation of this December 31, 2017 Form 10-K, the Registrants’ management, under the supervision and with the participation of each Registrant’s Principal
Item 9B. Other Information
Kunal Kaul resigned as Executive Officer (PEO) and Principal Financial Officer (PFO), evaluated the effectivenessVice President, Operations of the design and operation of each Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of December 31, 2017. Each Registrant’s PEO and PFO have concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, each Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.Company, effective March 13, 2020.
Item 9B.
Other Information
Not applicable.


62




PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Executive Officers, Directors and Key Employees
The following table sets forth information about PMI’s executive officers and directors as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
NameAgePosition(s)
David Kimball4749 Chief Executive Officer and DirectorChairman of the Board
Usama Ashraf4143 Chief Financial Officer
Brad PenningtonNasos Topakas3655 Chief RiskTechnology Officer
Kunal KaulJulie Hwang4142 Executive Vice President, Operations
Sachin D. Adarkar51General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Nasos Topakas53Chief Technology Officer
Rajeev V. Date4648 Director
Patrick W. Grady3537 Director
David R. Golob50Director
Claire A. Huang5557 Director
Nigel W. Morris5961 Director
Mason D. Haupt6264 Director
David Kimball has served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of PMI since December 2016. From March 2016 to February 2017, Mr. Kimball served as PMI's Chief Financial Officer. In May 2019, Mr. Kimball was appointed Chairman of the Board. He also currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and a director of PFL. Prior to joining PMI, Mr. Kimball was Senior Financial Officer of United Services Automobile Association's (USAA) Chief Operating Office, with financial responsibility for the real estate unit, the bank, the P&C and life insurance companies, the investment management company, and the call centers/distribution functions. Before his position as Senior Financial Officer of USAA's Chief Operating Office, Mr. Kimball spent eight years in various finance roles at USAA, including Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance; Corporate Treasurer; Chief Financial Officer of USAA Federal Savings Bank; and Assistant Vice President of Capital Markets. Prior to his time at USAA, Mr. Kimball spent ten years at Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company in both the U.S. and U.K., working on their securitization programs, debt issuance, and a variety of financial planning and analysis positions. Mr. Kimball holds an M.B.A. and a B.A. in English from Brigham Young University. PMI believes that Mr. Kimball's financial and business expertise give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Usama Ashraf has served as Chief Financial Officer of PMI since February 2017. He is currently responsible for Prosper's finance, capital markets, risk and business intelligence functions. He also currently serves as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and a director of PFL. Prior to joining PMI, from February 2016 to February 2017, Mr. Ashraf served as Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer at Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (“Annaly"Annaly”) with responsibility for treasury, tax, management reporting and financial planning & analysis.. Prior to his time at Annaly, Mr. Ashraf worked at United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”), where he served as Corporate Treasurer from November 2014 to February 2016 and Assistant Corporate Treasurer from January 2014 to October 2014. Before joining USAA, Mr. Ashraf spent 13 years at CIT Group, where he held various positions in the Treasury and Corporate M&A departments, most recently serving as Deputy Treasurer with responsibility for the firm’s Treasury activities in the United States. He started his career in the investment banking division of Salomon Smith Barney/Citigroup focused on M&A. Mr. Ashraf received a B.S. in Economics, with concentrations in Finance and Accounting, from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Brad Pennington has served as Chief Risk Officer of PMI since May 2016. Prior to his appointment as Chief Risk Officer, Mr. Pennington served as PMI’s Vice President of Risk Analysis from April 2015 to May 2016 and Director of Risk Analysis from February 2012 to April 2015. Before joining PMI, from August 2010 to February 2012, Mr. Pennington was Assistant Director of Risk Management Services with Moody’s Analytics, where he worked with large global and U.S. bank clients focusing on Economic Capital, Basel Compliance and PD, LGD and EAD model development. Prior to his time at Moody’s, Mr. Pennington spent 6 years at First Equity Card, a small-business credit card specialty finance start-up, where he served as Manager of Predictive


Analytics from June 2005 to July 2010. Mr. Pennington received a B.S. in Economics from the Wharton Undergraduate School where he completed a self-directed course of study, obtaining minors in Finance, Statistics, Mathematics, Econometrics and Operations Research.
Kunal Kaul has served as PMI’s Executive Vice President, Operations since late December 2015. Prior to joining PMI, Mr. Kaul spent more than 13 years at Capital One, where he served in various positions, including Senior Business Director, Senior Business Manager and Senior Product Manager, across a number of departments. In his most recent roles at Capital One, Mr. Kaul served as Senior Business Director - Head of Home Loans Originations Operations Excellence from February 2015 to December 2015 and Senior Business Director - Retail Bank Mortgage & Home Equity Lending from January 2014 to February 2015. Mr. Kaul has an MBA from the Indian Institute of Management (Bangalore, India) and a degree in Chemical Engineering from Bombay University.
Sachin D. Adarkar has served as PMI’s General Counsel and Secretary since August 2009. Mr. Adarkar also serves as Secretary of PFL.  Prior to joining PMI, he served as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., a wholesale mortgage lender in Novato, CA. Prior to joining GreenPoint, Mr. Adarkar spent several years practicing with the law firm of Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, in San Francisco (now part of Arnold & Porter LLP), and also served as Vice President and General Counsel of Valley Media, Inc., a music and video distributor. Mr. Adarkar has a J.D. from UCLA, an M.A. from the University of California at Berkeley and a B.A., cum laude, from Georgetown University. Mr. Adarkar is a member of the California Bar. On March 14, 2018, Sachin Adarkar announced his intention to resign as General Counsel and Secretary of PMI and Secretary of PFL, effective April 13, 2018.
Nasos Topakas has served as Chief Technology Officer since April 2017. Prior to joining PMI, from June 2010 to February 2017, Mr. Topakas served as Chief Technology Officer at Art.com, Inc., an online wall art and contemporary decor retailer, where he was head of all technology and product departments, with responsibility for the overall technology vision, strategy, engineering execution, and architectural direction. Prior to his time at Art.com, Inc., Mr. Topakas worked at SendMe, Inc., where he served as Chief Technology Officer from November 2007 to May 2010. As Chief Technology Officer of SendMe, Inc., Mr. Topakas was head of all technology departments, including Engineering, Architecture, Technical Project Office, QA, Technical Ops and Corporate IT. Mr. Topakas participated atin the M.B.A. executive program from Golden Gate University and holds a B.S. in Computer Science from San Francisco State University.
63




Julie Hwang has served as PMI’s Secretary and General Counsel since April 2018. Ms. Hwang previously served as PMI’s Deputy General Counsel from January 2017 to April 2018 and Assistant General Counsel from August 2015 to January 2017. Ms. Hwang also currently serves as PFL’s Secretary, a position she has held since April 2018. Before joining PMI in August 2015, Ms. Hwang served as Associate General Counsel at One Kings Lane, Inc., a home décor and luxury furniture retailer, from May 2014 to August 2015. Prior to One Kings Lane, Ms. Hwang worked as an attorney at the law firms of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP for 7 years and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. for 3 years. Ms. Hwang has a J.D. from UCLA and a B.A. in International Relations from Stanford University.
Rajeev V. Date has served as one of PMI’s directors since July 2013. Mr. Date previously served as one of PMI’s directors from January 2009 to September 2010.2010, and he is currently a director of Megalith Financial Acquisition Corp. and Green Dot Corporation. Mr. Date currently serves as the Managing Partner of Fenway Summer LLC, a U.S. financial advisory and investment firm. From January 2012 to January 2013, Mr. Date served as the Deputy Director of the United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). Before being appointed Deputy Director, Mr. Date was appointed the Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury for the CFPB, and, in that capacity, acted as the interim leader of the CFPB. From October 2010 to August 2011, Mr. Date served as Associate Director of Research, Markets, and Regulations of the CFPB. Prior to joining the CFPB, Mr. Date served as Chairman & Executive Director of Cambridge Winter Center for Financial Institutions Policy, a non-profit nonpartisan think tank focused on financial institutions policy, from March 2009 to September 2010. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Date served as a Managing Director in the Financial Institutions Group at Deutsche Bank Securities, where his key responsibility was acting as a coverage officer for specialty finance firms and regional banks. Before that, Mr. Date was Senior Vice President for Corporate Strategy and Development at Capital One Financial, where he led M&A development efforts across the U.S. banking and specialty finance markets. He began his business career in the financial institutions practice of the consulting firm McKinsey & Company. He has also served as an attorney, in both private practice and government. Mr. Date received a J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School and a B.S. (highest honors) from University of California, Berkeley. PMI believes that Mr. Date’s financial, business and regulatory expertise give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director. Mr. Date qualifies as an "audit“audit committee financial expert"expert” under SEC guidelines.
Patrick W. Grady has served as one of PMI’s directors since January 2013. Mr. Grady is a Partner of Sequoia Capital, a private investment partnership, which he joined in 2007. Prior to joining Sequoia Capital, Mr. Grady was an Associate at Summit Partners from 2004 to 2007. He is also a current director of Okta, Inc. Mr. Grady holds a B.S. in Economics and Finance from Boston College. PMI believes that Mr. Grady’s experience as a venture capital investor with a focus on financial technologies and his overall management experience, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director. Mr. Grady qualifies as an "audit“audit committee financial expert"expert” under SEC guidelines.
David R. Golob has served as one of PMI’s directors since May 2014. Mr. Golob has been a Partner at Francisco Partners, a private equity firm, since 2001. Mr. Golob currently serves on the board of directors of Barracuda Networks. Mr. Golob holds an A.B. degree in chemistry from Harvard College and an M.B.A. degree from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. PMI


believes that Mr. Golob’s financial and business expertise, including his experience in the private equity and venture capital industries analyzing, investing in and serving on the boards of directors of technology companies, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Claire A. Huang has served as a director of PMI since December 2017. Ms. Huang has also beenis currently a member of the board of directors of:of PODS, a leading storage and moving company, since 2018; and she previously served as a director of Mirador Financial, Inc., a small business lending platform, since June 2017. Ms. Huang previously served on the board of directors of Scotttrade,from 2017 to 2018, and Scottrade, a leading online brokerage firm, from 2015 to 2017. Ms. Huang has extensive experience in marketing and brand management. She served as the first global Chief Marketing Officer of JP Morgan Chase from 2012 to 2014, where she worked with the marketing teams across all Chase retail and JP Morgan wholesale businesses to build brands and businesses with a customer focus. Before joining JP Morgan Chase, from 2008 to 2012, Ms. Huang held global head of marketing positions at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, where she was responsible for a number of high profile marketing initiatives, including the integration of Merrill Lynch and Bank of America and the launch of Merrill Edge, the company’s brokerage platform. Prior to her time at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Ms. Huang held marketing leadership positions at Fidelity Investments, American Express Company, Wise Foods, and The Haagen-Dazs Company. Ms. Huang received a B.A. in Economics from De La Salle University in Manilla,Manila, Philippines. PMI believes that Ms. Huang’s marketing and brand management expertise, as well as her experience at several leading financial institutions, give her the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Nigel W. Morris has served as one of PMI’s directors since June 2014. Mr. Morris previously served as one of PMI’s directors from December 2009 to January 2013. Mr. Morris is the managing partner of QED Investors, an investment firm he founded in 2008. Mr. Morris was also the co-founder of Capital One Financial Services, where he served as President and Chief Operating Officer and Vice Chairman from 1994 until his retirement in 2004. Mr. Morris has a BSCBSc in Psychology from University of East London University in London, England and an MBA with distinction from London Business School, where he is also a fellow.School. PMI believes that Mr. Morris’s financial and business expertise, including his diversified background of managing and directing public companies, his experience with financial services firms, as well as his general operational and management experience, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
64




Mason D. Haupt has served as one of PMI’s directors since February 2018. He has more than 30 years of experience working in the investment management business. Mr. Haupt served as a Portfolio Manager at Soros Fund Management, LLC, a private investment management firm, from August 2008 to March 2014, and prior to that, from 2006 to 2008, he engaged in private investment activities. From June 2003 to March 2006, Mr. Haupt was a Partner at Five Mile Capital Partners, LLC, an alternative investment and asset management company. During his time at Five Mile Capital Partners, Mr. Haupt served as Portfolio Manager of the company’s Housatonic Fund, a relative value, fixed income hedge fund. Mr. Haupt served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MortgageSight, an electronic platform for mortgage securities, from 2000 to 2001. Previously, he spent more than a decade with Salomon Brothers, culminating in the position of Managing Director of the Mortgage Securities Department. Mr. Haupt received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a B.S. in Economics, with concentrations in Management and Accounting, from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. PMI believes that Mr. Haupt’s financial and business expertise, including his extensive investment management experience, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Board Composition and Election of Directors
PMI’s board of directors currently consists of eight seats, with one vacancy to be filled by a designee of the Series A-1 Holders.Holders and one vacancy to be filled by a designee of Francisco Partners III, L.P. All of the current members of PMI's board of directors were elected as directors pursuant to the terms of a voting rights agreement entered into among certain of PMI’s stockholders. In selecting the composition of its board of directors, PMI seeks to ensure that its board of directors collectively has a balance of expertise in the following areas: internet basedinternet-based business, consumer financial products and experience directing public and start-up companies. Based on these criteria, PMI believes that its board of directors has been effective in identifying diverse directors. The board of directors’ composition provisions of PMI’s voting rights agreement are still in effect. For more information regarding the terms of the voting rights agreement, see “Item 13. – CertainItem 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.” Holders of the Notes offered through our marketplace, and the accompanying PMI Management Rights, will have no ability to elect or influence PMI’s directors or approve significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of PMI or its assets.
Board Leadership
Because PMI’s common stock is not listed on a national exchange, PMI is not required to maintain a board of directors consisting of a majority of independent directors, or to maintain an audit, nominating or compensation committee. PMI does not have a lead independent director.


Code of Ethics
Our Board of Directors is committed to a high standard of corporate governance practices and, through its oversight role, believes that it has encouraged and promoted a requisite culture of ethical business conduct among PMI’s officers and employees. To memorialize its commitment to these standards, the Board of Directors of PMI adopted a “Code of Ethics and Business Conduct” that applies to all of PMI's employees, directors and officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website at https://www.prosper.com/plp/about/legal. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendment to, or waiver from, certain provisions of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on Prosper's website or in public filings.
Director Independence
Because PMI’s common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association or to issuers of such securities, PMI is not required to maintain a board of directors consisting of a majority of independent directors or to maintain an audit committee, nominating committee or compensation committee consisting solely of independent directors. Nevertheless, PMI’s board of directors has determined the independence of each director based on the independence criteria set forth in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). In making its determinations, the Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with Prosper and all other facts and circumstances the board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including any transactions between each director or any member of his or her family, and Prosper, its senior management or our independent registered public accounting firm. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, the board of directors determined that Ms. Huang and each of Messrs. Date, Grady, GolobHaupt and Morris do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE.
65




Board Committees
Nominating Committee
PMI is not a “listed issuer” as defined under Section 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Therefore, PMI is not required to have a nominating committee comprised of independent directors. PMI currently does not have a standing nominating committee and accordingly, there are no charters for such committee. PMI believes that a nominating committee is not necessary for a company of its size with its type of business. PMI also believes that its directors collectively have the requisite background, experience, and knowledge to fulfill the limited duties and obligations that a nominating committee may have.
Compensation Committee
PMI’s board of directors approved the formation of a Compensation Committee in August 2011. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Patrick W. Grady (Chair), Mason D. Haupt, and Claire A. Huang. The Compensation Committee oversees PMI’s executive officer compensation arrangements, plans, policies and programs maintained by PMI and administers PMI’s equity-based compensation plan for employees generally (including issuance of stock options, RSUs and other equity-based awards granted other than pursuant to a plan). The Compensation Committee meets at such times as determined appropriate by the Chair of the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee is exempt from independence listing standards because PMI's common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association or to issuers of such securities. Nevertheless, the board of directors of PMI has determined that each of the current members of PMI's Compensation Committee is independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and NYSE.
Audit Committee
PMI’s board of directors approved the formation of an Audit Committee in January 2010. The current members of the Audit Committee are Rajeev V. Date (Chair) and Patrick W. Grady. The Audit Committee oversees financial risk exposures, including monitoring the integrity of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, internal controls over financial reporting and the independence of PMI’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee receives internal control related assessments and reviews and discusses PMI’s annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements with management. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to compliance matters, the Audit Committee meets at least quarterly with management, PMI’s Independent Registered Public Accounting firm and PMI’s internal legal counsel to discuss risks related to PMI’s financial reporting function.


The Audit Committee is exempt from independence listing standards because PMI's common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association or to issuers of such securities. Nevertheless, the board of directors of PMI has determined that each of the current members of PMI's Audit Committee is independent under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE, and also satisfies the independence requirements of Section 10(m)(3) of the Exchange Act. Additionally, PMI's board of directors has determined that each of the current members of the Audit Committee is an audit committee financial expert as defined under SEC regulations and the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE.
Limitations on Officers’ and Directors’ Liability and Indemnification Agreements
As permitted by Delaware law, PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that limit or eliminate the personal liability of its directors for breaches of duty to the corporation. PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws limit the liability of directors to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breaches of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:
any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to PMI or PMI’s stockholders;
any act or omission not in good faith, believed to be contrary to the interests of PMI or its shareholders, involving reckless disregard for the director’s duty, for acts that involve an unexcused pattern of inattention that amounts to an abdication of duty, or that involves intentional misconduct or knowing or culpable violation of law;
any unlawful payments related to dividends, unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions, loans, guarantees or other distributions; or
any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
These limitations do not affect the availability of equitable remedies, including injunctive relief or rescission. As permitted by Delaware law, PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that:
PMI will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law;
66




PMI may indemnify its other employees and other agents to the same extent that PMI indemnifies its officers and directors; and
PMI will advance expenses to its directors and officers in connection with a legal proceeding, and may advance expenses to any employee or agent; provided, however, that such advancement of expenses shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by the person to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that the person was not entitled to be indemnified.
The indemnification provisions contained in PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not exclusive.
In addition to the indemnification provided for in PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, PMI has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and officers. The indemnification agreements require PMI, among other things, to indemnify such persons for all expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement (if such settlement is approved in advance by PMI) (collectively, “Expenses”), actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the investigation, defense or appeal of any proceeding to which such person may be made a party, a potential party, a non-party witness, or otherwise by reason of: (i) such person’s service as a director or officer of PMI; (ii) any action or inaction taken by such person or on such person’s part while acting as director, officer, employee or agent of PMI; or (iii) such person’s actions while serving at the request of PMI as a director, officer, employee, trustee, general partner, managing member, agent or fiduciary of PMI or any other entity, in each case, whether or not serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is or was incurred. In addition, PMI is required to indemnify against any Expenses actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any action establishing or enforcing a right to indemnification or advancement of expenses under the indemnification agreement or under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies maintained by PMI to the


extent that such person is successful in such action. The indemnification agreements also provide that PMI agrees to indemnify such persons to the fullest extent permitted by law, even if such indemnification is not specifically authorized by the other provisions of the agreement or PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws. Moreover, the indemnification agreements provide that any future changes under Delaware law that expand the ability of a Delaware corporation to indemnify its officers and directors are automatically incorporated into the agreements.
Under the indemnification agreements, PMI is not obligated to provide indemnification on account of any proceeding unless such person acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of PMI, and with respect to criminal proceedings, such person had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of a proceeding by judgment, settlement, or conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent does not, by itself, create the presumption that such person did not satisfy the above standards. In addition, under the indemnification agreements, PMI is not obligated to provide indemnification for: (i) any proceedings or claims initiated or brought voluntarily by such person and not by way of defense, unless such indemnification is authorized by PMI, other than a proceeding to establish such person’s right to indemnification; (ii) any expenses incurred by such person with respect to any proceeding instituted by such person to enforce and interpret the terms of his indemnification agreement, unless such person is successful in such action; (iii) which payment has actually been made to or on behalf of such person under any statute, insurance policy, indemnity provision, vote or otherwise, except with respect to any excess beyond the amount paid; (iv) an accounting or disgorgement of profits pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, as amended, or similar provisions of federal, state or local statutory law or common law, if such person is held liable therefor (including pursuant to any settlement arrangements); and (v) any reimbursement of PMI by such person of any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation or of any profits realized by such person from the sale of securities of PMI, as required in each case under the Exchange Act, as amended (including any such reimbursements that arise from an accounting restatement of PMI pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or the payment to PMI of profits arising from the purchase and sale by such person of securities in violation of Section 306 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), if such person is held liable therefor (including pursuant to any settlement arrangements).
PMI also maintains an insurance policy that covers certain liabilities of its directors and officers arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers.
PMI believes that these provisions and agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. To the extent these provisions permit PMI to indemnify its officers and directors for liabilities arising under the Securities Act, however, PMI has been informed by the SEC that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Item 11.Executive Compensation

67




Item 11.  Executive Compensation
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
- Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview

This section describes PMI's executive compensation objectives, compensation-setting process, executive compensation components and significant 20172019 compensation decisions for PMI's named executive officers ("NEOs"(“NEOs”). The compensation provided to PMI's NEOs for 20172019 is set forth in detail in the Summary Compensation Table and other tables and the accompanying footnotes and narrative that follow this section.
PMI's named executive officers for 20172019 are as follows:
David Kimball, our Chief Executive Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer until February 27, 2017;Officer;
Usama Ashraf, our Chief Financial Officer as of February 27, 2017;Officer;
Brad Pennington,Nasos Topakas, our Chief RiskTechnology Officer;
Julie Hwang, our General Counsel and Secretary;
Kunal Kaul, our Executive Vice President, Operations; and


Nasos Topakas,Justine Metz, our Chief Technology Officer as of April 17, 2017.Executive Vice President, Marketing through November 1, 2019.

Executive Compensation Objectives
The objectives of PMI's executive compensation are to:
attract, retain and motivate senior management leaders who are capable of advancing PMI's mission and strategy and ultimately, creating and maintaining its long-term equity value;
align the interests of PMI's executive officers with its stockholders’ long-term interests; and
reward executive officers for their contributions to PMI's overall performance as well as for their individual performance.

Compensation-Setting Process
In 2017 and in prior years, PMI did not have a formal incentive compensation program in place for its executive officers. Role of Our Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is responsiblehas primary responsibility for overseeing all aspects of our executive compensation program, including evaluating and approving compensationexecutive salaries, annual bonus awards and the size and structure of equity awards for PMI's executive officers, including the NEOs.
Role of Management. In setting 20172019 compensation, PMI's Chief Executive Officer worked closely with the Compensation Committee in making recommendations and attending Committee meetings. Because of his daily involvement with PMI's executive team, the Chief Executive Officer was involved in the determination of compensation for all of PMI's executive officers other than himself. The Compensation Committee also delegated to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to make compensation decisions for senior management and executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer), subject to certain compensation limits set by the Compensation Committee.

Executive Compensation Components

PMI's 20172019 Named Executive Officer Compensationcompensation packages include: (1) base salary; (2) cash bonuses; and (3) equity-based compensation in the form of stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs). PMI believes that this compensation mix supports its objective of attracting, motivating and retaining a talented and entrepreneurial executive team who will provide leadership for Prosper’s success in dynamic and competitive markets. PMI's compensation program is balanced among all three components in order to attract top talent and maximize retention, while ensuring that an appropriate portion of the executives’ compensation is tied to the Company's and its stockholders’ long-term interests.

Base Salary. Base salary is a fixed amount, and is not tied to any metric relating to the performance of PMI's business as a whole. The base salary of each executive officer is initially established in the executive officer's offer letter, and reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee. In determining base salaries for 2017,2019, PMI's Compensation Committee together with the Chief Executive Officer considered the individual executive officer's scope of responsibilities, contributions, prior salary level and position (in case of a promotion), and financial and market conditions.


68




The following table summarizes information regarding the base salaries for PMI's named executive officers for 2017:2019:
Name 2017 Base Salary
David Kimball (1) $500,000
Usama Ashraf (2) $350,000
Brad Pennington (3) $350,000
Kunal Kaul (4) $315,000
Nasos Topakas (5) $350,000

(1)In early 2017, PMI’s Compensation Committee reviewed executive base salaries and decided to keep Mr. Kimball’s annual base salary at $500,000, the same level as the previous year.


2019 Base Salary
(2)David Kimball (1)In February of 2017, PMI hired Mr. Ashraf as its new Chief Financial Officer, with an annual base salary of $350,000.
$500,000 
(3)Usama Ashraf (2)In early 2017, PMI’s Compensation Committee reviewed executive base salaries and decided to keep Mr. Pennington's annual base salary at $350,000, the same level as the previous year.
$430,000 
(4)Nasos Topakas (3)Mr. Kaul’s annual base salary was increased from $300,000 to $315,000 in March of 2017.
$370,000 
(5)Julie Hwang (4)In April of 2017, PMI hired Mr. Topakas as its new Chief Technology Officer, with an annual base salary of $350,000.$335,000 
Kunal Kaul (5)$335,000 
Justine Metz (6)$335,000 

CashBonuses.  Generally, discretionary cash bonuses are not formally tied to any specific metrics regarding Company performance, and are determined by the
1.In March 2019, PMI’s Compensation Committee (in consultation withreviewed executive base salaries and decided to keep Mr. Kimball’s annual base salary at $500,000, the Chief Executive Officer) in its sole discretion. same level as the previous year.
2.In prior years, theMarch 2019, PMI’s Compensation Committee has approved discretionary cash bonuses for PMI'sreviewed executive officers, including its NEOs, in orderbase salaries and decided to reward PMI's individual executive officers for their contribution toward PMI's growth initiatives and performance toward individual goal achievement.increase Mr. Ashraf's annual base salary from $420,000 to $430,000.

3.In March 2019, Mr. Topakas' annual base salary was increased from $360,000 to $370,000.
4.In 2017, theMarch 2019, Ms. Hwang's annual base salary was increased from $325,000 to $335,000.
5.In March 2019, Mr. Kaul’s annual base salary was increased from $325,000 to $335,000.
6.In March 2019, Ms. Metz's annual base salary was increased from $325,000 to $335,000.
CashBonuses. The Company useduses cash bonuses primarily to attractmotivate and retain senior management leaders that wereare critical to advancing the Company’s shortCompany's short- and long termlong-term strategic goals. In November 2016, in order to incentivize and encourage2019, we based annual NEO bonuses on both the grantees to remain with the Company, the Compensation Committee awarded certain executive officers, including Mr. Kaul and Mr. Pennington, retention bonus awards in lieu of performance bonuses. The retention bonuses replaced the grantees’ 2016 and 2017 performance-based cash bonuses, and were equal to 75% of their respective base salary as of the close of the applicable calendar year. The retention bonuses for 2017 will be paid to Messrs. Kaul and Pennington in March 2018.

The Company also made use of guaranteed cash bonuses in 2017 to help attract and retain critical talent, including NEOs Mr. Ashraf, who joined as Chief Financial Officer in February 2017, and Mr. Topakas, who joined as Chief Technology Officer in April 2017. These bonuses will be paid to Messrs. Ashraf and Topakas in March 2018.

In November 2016, in connection with Mr. Kimball’s promotion to Chief Executive Officer, PMI’s Board of Directors increased his bonus target from 50% to 100% of his base salary, to be paid on a quarterly basis. The performance-based bonus was subject to Mr. Kimball’s achievement of certain Board-approved financial, operational and strategic performance objectives. The Board of Directorsobjectives as well as other factors, including the NEO’s contribution toward PMI’s growth initiatives and performance toward individual goal achievement.
In February 2020, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s performance and progress towards the established 2019 objectives, atand approved a bonus award of 90% of the end of each quarter of 2017 and determined to pay Mr. Kimball 100% of hisannual target bonus amount for each NEO.
The amounts and terms of the period, withbonuses awarded to each of the fourth quarter’s installment to be paidNEOs in March 2018.2019 are disclosed below, in the sections titled “Summary Compensation Table” and “Narrative Discussion of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.”

Equity Compensation. PMI has used stock options and restricted stock units ("RSUs"(“RSUs”) as the principal components of its executive equity compensation. Consistent with its compensation objectives, PMI believes this approach aligns the interestinterests of its grantees with the long-term interests of PMI’s stockholders. PMI believes that stock options and RSUs also serve as an effective retention tooltools due to vesting requirements that are based on continued service with the company. In granting equity awards, PMI has customarily considered, among other things, the executive officer’sofficers' cash compensation, the need to retain and motivate executive officers and to create a meaningful opportunity for reward predicated on the creation of long-term stockholder value, PMI's financial results, and each executive officer's individual contributions and responsibilities. In 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of stock options to certain of its NEOs for performance compensation, retention and motivational purposes. The amounts and terms of the awards granted to each of the NEOssuch NEO in 2017 is2019 are disclosed in the 20172019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and accompanying footnotes to the table of the Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172019 Fiscal Year End table.End.
Employment Agreements

PMI has entered into employment arrangements with each of its NEOs, which are comprised of an offer letter and an At Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment and Arbitration Agreement. Each of these arrangements was approved or authorized on PMI’s behalf by the Compensation Committee or, in certain instances, its Board of Directors.

Each of the offer letters provided for "at will"“at will” employment and sets forth the initial compensation arrangements for the NEO, generally including an initial base salary, an annual cash bonus opportunity, and an equity award. Certain of the offer letters provide for payments or an acceleration of the executive's equity award grant upon termination of their employment in specified situations, including following a change in control. These arrangements (including potential payments and terms) are discussed in more detail in the “Narrative Discussion of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” and the "Potential“Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or a Change in Control"In Control of PMI” sections and related tables below.

69






Other Compensation Information

Benefits Programs

PMI's employee benefit programs, including its 401(k) plan, health and welfare programs, Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan and 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, are designed to provide a competitive level of benefits to PMI's employees generally, including its executive officers and their families. PMI's executive officers are entitled to participate in the same employee benefit plans, and on the same terms and conditions, as all other full-time employees.

PMI's 401(k) plan covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. PMI's contributions to the 401(k) plan are discretionary. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, PMI contributed $2.2$2.3 million to the 401(k) plan.

All full-time employees, including PMI's named executive officers, may participate in its health and welfare benefit programs, including medical, dental and vision care coverage, disability insurance and life insurance.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Currently, PMI does not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of its compensation. Accordingly, PMI does not generally provide perquisites, such as company cars and paid parking spaces, to its executive officers. PMI does reimburse its executive officers for certain relocation expenses, subject to the terms and conditions prescribed by the Compensation Committee. In 2017, PMI reimbursed Mr. Ashraf for relocation expenses incurred in connection with his employment. The reimbursement amounts paid to Mr. Ashraf for 2017 is disclosed in the “All Other Compensation” column and accompanying footnotes of the Summary Compensation Table.

In the future, PMI may provide additional perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as where PMI believes it is appropriate to assist an individual executive in the performance of his or her duties and for recruitment, motivation or retention purposes.

Post-Employment Compensation

The Compensation Committee recognizes that a possible, threatened, or pending change of control transaction could result in the departure or distraction of PMI’s executives. To establish a meaningful financial incentive for PMI’s executive officers to work diligently through and beyond a proposed transaction that may involve a change in control of the company, certain of the stock options and restricted stock units granted to PMI’s NEOs will fully vest upon a change in control of PMI, while others will fully vest in the event that such officer is subject to a termination of employment without cause within 12 months after a change in control of PMI.

In addition, during 20162017 and 2017,2018, PMI entered into severance arrangements with each of Mr.Messrs. Kimball, Mr. PenningtonAshraf and Mr. Topakas, and with each of Mses. Hwang and Metz, as part of their offer letters and amendment to offer letter (with respect to Mr. Pennington)Ashraf). The severance arrangements provide that each of Mr.Messrs. Kimball, Mr. PenningtonAshraf and Mr. Topakas, and each of Mses. Hwang and Metz, would be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to six months’ of annual base salary (less applicable deductions and withholdings) in the event that the respective officer’s employment is terminated by PMI without cause or by Mr. Kimball, Mr. Pennington and Mr. Topakas, asthe applicable executive officer for good reason (each as defined in the applicable offer letter). Receipt of these severance benefits is conditioned on the officer’s signing a release of claims in favor of PMI.

Ms. Metz departed from her role as Executive Vice President, Marketing effective November 1, 2019.
For additional information regarding these severance and change in control arrangements, see "Potential“Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control.Control of PMI.

Compensation Risk Assessment

PMI's management evaluates and mitigates any risk that may exist relating to its compensation plans, practices and policies for all employees, including PMI's NEOs. PMI's management has concluded that PMI's compensation policies and practices do not create or promote inappropriate or excessive risk taking.

70




Summary Compensation Table


The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned during the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 20162019, 2018 and December 31, 20152017 by each of PMI’s named executive officers (in thousands):  
YearSalary ($)Bonus ($)Stock Awards ($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)(1)
All Other
Compensation ($)(2)
Totals ($)
Name and Principal Position
David Kimball2019$500  $450  —  —  $14  $964  
     Chief Executive Officer2018500  450  —  629  14  1,593  
2017500  542  —  2,57214  3,628  
Usama Ashraf (3)2019428  289  —  40  14  771  
     Chief Financial Officer2018401  279  964  185  14  1,843  
2017294  283  —  472  64  1,113  
Nasos Topakas (4)2019368  249  —  —  14  631  
     Chief Technology Officer2018358  251  964  —  14  1,587  
2017248  197  —  943   1,396  
Julie Hwang (5)2019333  195  —  276  14  818  
     General Counsel and Secretary2018285  174  —  315  11  785  
Kunal Kaul2019333  195  —  —  14  542  
     Executive Vice President,2018323  230  —  64  14  631  
     Operations
2017313  236  —  119  12  680  
Justine Metz (6)2019279  —  —  —  237  516  
     Former Executive Vice President,
Marketing
2018323  230  —  484  44  1,081  
1.The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units and stock options granted to the named executive officers as calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Board’s Topic ASC 718, Compensation –Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) using a Black-Scholes model to purchase shares of PMI’s common stock.  The key assumptions used in PMI’s ASC 718 calculation are discussed in Note 2 of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
2.“All Other Compensation” consists of compensation received from employer matching contributions to PMI’s 401(k) plan and relocation reimbursement paid by PMI for each named executive officer.  
3.Mr. Ashraf joined PMI in February 2017 as its Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Ashraf's total compensation for 2017 includes relocation expenses of $50,052 and a signing bonus of $20,000.
4.Mr. Topakas joined PMI in April 2017 as its Chief Technology Officer.
5.Ms. Hwang was promoted to General Counsel and Secretary of PMI in June 2018. Ms. Hwang's total compensation for 2018 includes a one-time retention bonus of $66,354.
6.Ms. Metz departed from her role as Executive Vice President, Marketing effective November 1, 2019. Ms. Metz's total compensation for 2019 includes a cash severance payment of $223,332. Ms. Metz's total compensation for 2018 includes relocation expenses of $29,900.

71




Name and Principal Position Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) Stock Awards ($)(1) 
Option
Awards
($)(1)
 
All Other
Compensation ($)(2)
 Totals ($)
David Kimball (3) 2017 $500
 $542
 $
 $2,572
 $14
 $3,628
Chief Executive Officer and 2016 305
 383
 1,510
 3,351
 31
 5,580
former Chief Financial Officer

              
Usama Ashraf (4) 2017 294
 283
 
 472
 64
 1,113
Chief Financial Officer             

Brad Pennington 2017 350
 263
 
 291
 14
 918
Chief Risk Officer 2016 316
 263
 
 2,572
 11
 3,162
Kunal Kaul (5) 2017 313
 236
 
 119
 12
 680
Executive Vice President, 2016 300
 225
 268
 1,185
 31
 2,009
Operations             

Nasos Topakas (6) 2017 248
 197
 
 943
 8
 1,396
Chief Technology Officer       

 

   

(1)The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units and stock options granted to the named executive officers as calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Board’s Topic ASC 718, Compensation –Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) using a Black-Scholes model to purchase shares of PMI’s common stock.  The key assumptions used in PMI’s ASC 718 calculation are discussed in Note 2 of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
(2)“All Other Compensation” consists of compensation received from employer matching contributions to PMI’s 401(k) plan and relocation reimbursement paid by PMI for each named executive officer.  
(3)Mr. Kimball joined PMI in March 2016 as its Chief Financial Officer. He was appointed PMI's Chief Executive Officer in December 2016. Mr. Kimball's Total Compensation for 2016 includes relocation expenses of $31,141 and a sign-on bonus of $125,000.
(4)Mr. Ashraf joined PMI in February 2017 as its Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Ashraf's total compensation for 2017 includes relocation expenses of $50,052 and a signing bonus of $20,000.
(5)Mr. Kaul's Total Compensation for 2016 includes relocation expenses of $20,583.
(6)Mr. Topakas joined PMI in April 2017 as its Chief Technology Officer.
20172019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards (1)(2)
The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to PMI'sthe listed PMI named executive officers during 20172019 (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information):

Grant Date (2)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(3)
Usama Ashraf11/5/19500,000  $0.17  $40  
Julie Hwang5/7/191,398,198  0.30  196  
11/5/191,000,000  0.17  80  

1.The following columns are intentionally omitted from this table: Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards, and Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards.
2.The equity awards granted to NEOs in 2019 were granted under, and governed by the terms of, PMI's 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and the applicable award agreements. See the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year-End table below for a description of the vesting schedule of the equity awards granted in 2019 and reported in the table above.
3.The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of the stock options granted to the named executive officers as calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Board’s Topic ASC 718, Compensation –Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) using a Black-Scholes model to purchase shares of PMI’s common stock.  The key assumptions used in PMI’s ASC 718 calculation are discussed in Note 2 of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

CEO Pay Ratio
In accordance with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, PMI is providing the following information for the year ended December 31, 2019:
The median of total compensation of all employees, excluding our CEO: $128,827;
The annual total compensation of our CEO: $964,000; and
The ratio of CEO total compensation to median employee total compensation: 7.48 to 1.
Our CEO pay ratio information is a reasonable good faith estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the SEC pay ratio rules and methods for disclosure. In order to determine the median employee from a compensation perspective, PMI examined cash compensation (salary, wages and cash bonuses) paid in the 2019 calendar year for all employees, excluding our CEO, employed as of December 31, 2019 (the “Determination Date”). On the Determination Date, Prosper’s employee population consisted of 404 individuals, all of whom were located in the United States. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time, and temporary employees. We did not include any contractors or workers employed through a third-party provider in our employee population.
To identify the “median employee,” we utilized the amount of base salary, wages and cash bonus our employees received, as reflected in our payroll records through the Determination Date and annualized such amounts for any individual hired during 2019. Once we identified our median employee, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2019 to determine the median employee total compensation in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K and compared such total compensation to the total compensation of PMI’s CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

72

Name Grant Date (2)  
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
  
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(3)
 
David Kimball 3/17/17  21,156,579
  $0.22
 $2,245
 
     3,526,628
(4) 
 0.22
 326
(5) 
Usama Ashraf 3/17/17  3,397,242
  0.22
 372
 
  11/7/17  402,848
  0.53
 100
 
Brad Pennington    3,226,649
(4) 
 0.22
 291
(5) 
Kunal Kaul    1,293,916
(4) 
 0.22
 119
(5) 
Nasos Topakas 11/7/17  3,800,000
  0.53
 943
 

(1)The following columns are intentionally omitted from this table: Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards, and Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards.
(2)The equity awards granted to the NEOs in 2017 were granted under, and governed by the terms of, PMI's 2015 Incentive Plan and the applicable award agreements. See the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End table below for a description of the vesting schedule of the equity awards granted in 2017 and reported in the Table above.
(3)The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units and stock options granted to the named executive officers as calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Board’s Topic ASC 718, Compensation –Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) using a Black-Scholes model to purchase shares of PMI’s common stock.  The key assumptions used in PMI’s ASC 718 calculation are discussed in Note 2 of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
(4)On March 17, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of PMI approved the repricing of all outstanding stock options held by employees and directors that had an exercise price above the then current fair market value of PMI’s common stock (the "Reprice"), effectively reducing the exercise price of such options to $0.22 per share. These options were granted in prior periods and repriced in connection with the Reprice.
(5)The incremental fair value of the holder's eligible outstanding options as of the repricing date are as follows: $326,000 for Mr. Kimball; $291,000 for Mr. Pennington; and $119,000 for Mr. Kaul.



Narrative Discussion of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
Offer Letters and Arrangements
David Kimball. In November 2016, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Kimball in connection with his appointment as its Chief Executive Officer. In addition to his initial base salary, Mr. Kimball's offer letter provided for (i) upeligibility to $500,000receive an annual performance bonus in bonus payments, subject to achievementa target amount of certain performance targets;100% of his base salary, payable on a quarterly basis; (ii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; and (iii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. PMI also committed to grant Mr. Kimball an equity award of options exercisable into shares of PMI common stock representing up to 7.1%5% of PMI’s capitalization on a fully diluted basis, subject to the terms and conditions of the offer letter. In addition, the offer letter included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under "Post-Employment Compensation"“Post-Employment Compensation” above.
Mr. Kimball's November 2016 offer letter replaced the offer letter PMI entered into with Mr. Kimball in March 2016 in connection with his appointment as its Chief Financial Officer. In addition to the severance, reimbursement and benefits arrangements included in the November 2016 offer letter, Mr. Kimball's March 2016 offer letter included his initial base salary


and equity grant as CFO and provided for a one-time sign-on bonus of $125,000, subject to certain repayment requirements in the event of Mr. Kimball’s termination from PMI within 12 months of his employment.
Usama Ashraf. In February 2017, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Ashraf in connection with his appointment as its Chief Financial Officer. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Ashraf's offer letter provided for (i) a one-time sign-on bonus of $20,000, subject to certain repayment requirements in the event of Mr. Ashraf's termination from PMI within 12 months of his employment; (ii) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 50% of his base salary; (iii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; (iv) reimbursement of certain short termshort-term housing expenses and (v) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. In July 2018, PMI and Mr. Ashraf executed an amendment to his offer letter that provides for certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.
In addition to the terms of Mr. Ashraf's amended offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus payment in an amount equal to 25% of his base salary. In August 2018, in connection with Mr. Ashraf's expanded scope of responsibilities in the role of Chief Financial Officer, the Compensation Committee increased his annual performance bonus target from 50% to 60% of his base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Ashraf's annual performance bonus target to 75% of his annual base salary.
Nasos Topakas. In April 2017, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Topakas in connection with his appointment as its Chief Technology Officer. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Topakas's offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 75% of his base salary in his first year of employment and 50% of his base salary in subsequent years; and (ii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. The offer letter also included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.
In addition to the terms of Mr. Topakas' amended offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus payment in an amount equal to 25% of his base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Topakas’s annual performance bonus target to 75% of his annual base salary.

Julie Hwang. In June 2018, PMI entered into an offer letter with Ms. Hwang in connection with her appointment as its General Counsel and Secretary. In addition to her initial base salary and equity grant, Ms. Hwang's offer letter provided for (i) a one-time retention bonus of $66,354, payable during the first quarter of March 2019; (ii) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 40% of her annual base salary; and (iii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. The offer letter also included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.
In addition to the terms of Ms. Hwang's offer letter (including the one-time retention bonus set forth therein), in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus in an amount equal to 35% of her base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Ms. Hwang's annual performance bonus target to 65% of her annual base salary.

Kunal Kaul. Kaul. In December 2015, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Kaul in connection with his appointment as its Executive Vice President, Operations. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Kaul's offer letter provided for (i) a one-time sign-on bonus of $40,000, subject to certain repayment requirements in the event of Mr. Kaul's termination from PMI within 12 months of his employment; (ii) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 40% of his base salary; (iii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; and (iv) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI.
Nasos Topakas
73




In addition to the terms of Mr. Kaul's offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus in an amount equal to 35% of his base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Kaul’s annual performance bonus target to 65% of his annual base salary.

Justine Metz. In AprilNovember 2017, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. TopakasMs. Metz in connection with hisher appointment as its Chief Technology Officer.Executive Vice President, Marketing. In addition to hisher initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Topakas'sMs. Metz's offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 75% of hisher annual base salary in his firstfor calendar year 2018 and 40% of employment and 50% of hisher annual base salary in subsequent years; and (ii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI.
Brad Pennington. In January 2012, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Pennington in connection with his appointment as its Director, Credit Risk Management. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Pennington's offer letter provided for (i) a one-time sign-on bonus of $15,000; (ii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; and (iii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. In November 2016, PMI amended Mr. Pennington'sThe offer letter to provide foralso included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under "Post-Employment Compensation"“Post-Employment Compensation” above.
In addition to the terms of Ms. Metz's offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus in an amount equal to 35% of her base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Ms. Metz’s annual performance bonus target to 65% of her annual base salary. Ms. Metz departed from her role as Executive Vice President, Marketing and exercised the severance arrangement, effective November 1, 2019.

Equity Incentive Plans
PMI grants equity awards primarily through its Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was approved as amended and restated by its stockholders on December 1, 2010; and its 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by PMI's Board of Directors on April 7, 2015 and subsequently amended by an Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2, and Amendment No. 3, which were approved by PMI's Board of Directors on February 15, 2016, May 19, 2016, and January 23, 2018, respectively (as amended, the "2015 Plan"“2015 Plan”). PMI also previously granted equity awards through its Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was approved as amended and restated by its stockholders on December 1, 2010, and expired in March 2015. The 2005 Plan and 2015 Plan are collectively referred to in this Annual Report as the "Equity Plans".“Equity Plans.”
In March 2015, the 2005 Plan expired, except that anyAny awards granted under the 2005 Plan prior to its expiration remain in effect pursuant to their terms. Unless sooner terminated by PMI’s Board of Directors, the 2015 Plan will expire ten years from the date of its adoption. All stock options granted to NEOs are incentive stock options, to the extent permissible under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. All equity awards to PMI’s employees and directors were granted at no less than the fair market value of its common stock on the date of each award. In the absence of a public trading market for PMI common stock, PMI’s Board of Directors, acting on its own or through the Compensation Committee, has determined the fair market value of its common stock in good faith based upon consideration of a number of relevant factors including the status of its development efforts, financial status and market conditions. See “Item 15.-NotesItem 15, “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”.Statements.”
The 2005 Plan provided for grants in the form of non-qualified stock options and stock purchase rights, which were available for grant to PMI’s directors, consultants or employees, including officers, and incentive stock options, which were available for grant solely to its employees, including officers. The 2015 Plan provides for grants in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and unrestricted stock. Under the 2015 Plan, incentive stock options may be granted solely to PMI’s employees, including officers. Awards other than incentive stock options may be granted to its directors, consultants or employees, including officers. The Equity Plans are administered by PMI’s Board of Directors, which in turn has delegated authority to administer the plans to the Compensation Committee.


Shares of PMI’s common stock subject to options that have expired or otherwise terminate under the 2015 Plan or the 2005 Plan without having been exercised in full will become available for grant under the 2015 Plan. Shares of PMI’s common stock issued under the 2015 Plan may include previously unissued shares or reacquired shares bought on the market or otherwise.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, an aggregate of 61,684,89695,037,086 options to purchase our common stock were authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan. Of such authorized options, as of December 31, 2017,2019, a total of 51,281,64475,280,973 options were outstanding under the 2015 Plan and 10,403,25219,756,113 options were available for grant, including 30,411,881 shares that were forfeited under the 2015 Plan.grant. As of December 31, 2017, 18,681,6072019, an aggregate of 60,140,838 options granted under the 2015 Plan were forfeited. As of December 31, 2019, 45,172,464 options under the 2015 Plan were vested and outstanding and 169,394 have been345,127 were exercised. As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were zero stock options available for grant under the 2005 Plan.
The NEOs identified herein have been granted equity awards upon employment with PMI, for merit increases, and for retention purposes.
74




Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172019 Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth certain information regarding outstanding equity awards granted to PMI’s named executive officers ("NEOs"(“NEOs”)that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017.  2019:
Grant DateVesting Commencement DateNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) ExercisableNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) UnexercisableOption Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration DateNumber of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (1)
David Kimball5/3/2016(2) 3/18/20161,322,742  88,183  0.22  5/3/2026—  
5/3/2016(3) 3/18/2016—  —  —  —  705,465  
6/17/2016(4) 4/28/20162,115,703  —  0.22  6/17/2026—  
3/17/2017(5) 12/1/201621,156,579  —  0.22  3/17/2027—  
3/20/2018(2) 3/1/20181,109,190  1,426,102  0.54  3/20/2028—  
Usama Ashraf3/17/2017(6) 2/27/20172,406,379  990,863  0.22  3/17/2027—  
 11/7/2017(6) 2/27/2017285,286  117,472  0.53  11/7/2027—  
3/20/2018(7) 3/1/2018—  —  —  —  1,784,793  
8/8/2018(6) 7/1/2018296,692  541,027  0.48  8/8/2028—  
11/5/2019(6) 11/5/2019—  500,000  0.17  11/5/2029
Nasos Topakas11/7/2017(6) 4/17/20172,533,333  1,266,667  0.53  11/7/2027—  
3/20/2018(7) 3/1/2018—  —  —  —  1,784,793  
Julie Hwang11/4/2015(8) 8/31/2015150,000  —  0.22  11/4/2025—  
5/3/2016(9) 4/28/201660,650  —  0.22  5/3/2026—  
3/17/2017(8) 1/1/201744,843  16,657  0.22  3/17/2027—  
3/20/2018(8) 3/1/201895,615  122,935  0.54  3/20/2028—  
8/8/2018(6) 6/1/2018444,276  740,462  0.48  8/8/2028—  
5/7/2019(6) 3/1/2019—  1,398,198  0.30  5/7/2029—  
11/5/2019(6) 11/5/2019—  1,000,000  0.17  11/5/2029—  
Kunal Kaul3/15/2016(7) 12/28/2015—  —  —  —  125,000  
5/3/2016(6) 12/28/2015250,000  —  0.22  5/3/2026—  
6/17/2016(10) 4/28/20161,043,916  —  0.22  6/17/2026—  
3/20/2018(6) 3/1/2018112,228  144,294  0.54  3/20/2028—  
Justine Metz (11)3/20/2018(6) 12/31/2017802,083  947,917  0.54  3/20/2028—  
3/20/2018(6) 3/1/201885,282  119,395  0.54  3/20/2028—  
Name Grant Date  Vesting Commencement Date Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (1)
David Kimball 5/3/2016
(2) 
 3/18/2016 617,279
 793,646
 0.22 5/2/2026  
  5/3/2016
(3) 
 3/18/2016 
 
 
 
 705,465
  6/17/2016
(4) 
 4/28/2016 1,175,391
 940,312
 0.22 6/16/2026 
  3/17/2017
(5) 
 12/1/2016 10,578,290
 10,578,289
 0.22 3/16/2027 
Usama Ashraf 3/17/2017
(2) 
 2/27/2017 
 3,397,242
 0.22 3/16/2027 
  11/7/2017
(2) 
 2/27/2017 
 402,758
 0.53 11/6/2027 
Brad Pennington 3/28/2012
(6) 
 2/27/2012 62,500
 
 0.22 2/27/2022 
  1/28/2014
(6) 
 1/1/2014 125,000
 
 0.11 1/28/2024 
  1/23/2015
(6) 
 1/16/2015 200,000
 
 0.22 1/22/2025 
  2/20/2015
(6) 
 2/13/2015 85,000
 
 0.22 2/19/2025 
  2/27/2015
(7) 
 2/27/2015 115,000
 
 0.22 2/26/2025 
  6/17/2016
(4) 
 4/28/2016 1,535,638
 1,228,511
 0.22 6/16/2026 
Kunal Kaul 3/15/2016
(3) 
 12/28/2015 
 
  3/14/2026 125,000
  5/3/2016
(2) 
 12/28/2015 125,000
 125,000
 0.22 5/2/2026 
  6/17/2016
(4) 
 4/28/2016 579,953
 463,963
 0.22 6/16/2026 
Nasos Topakas 11/7/2017
(2) 
 4/17/2017 
 3,800,000
 0.53 11/6/2027 
1.Represents restricted stock units (“RSUs”), in each case that remained unvested as of December 31, 2019.
(1)Represents restricted stock units (“RSUs”), in each case that remained unvested as of December 31, 2017.
(2)
2.This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable vesting commencement date set forth in the table (the "Vesting Commencement Date") and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years, except that, in the event the NEO is terminated without cause within 12 months of a change in control of PMI, a sale of all or substantially all of PMI's assets, or a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of PMI (each, a "Corporate Transaction"), any unvested options will vest in full immediately.
(3)These RSUs initially vest, if at all, when PMI files for an initial public offering and the lock-up period expires or there is a corporate transaction (as defined in the RSU grant notice), whichever occurs first (each, a “Triggering Event”). The number of RSUs that vest upon a Triggering Event will be equal to the number of RSUs that would


have vested had the RSUs been subject to only the following vesting condition: vesting over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable vesting commencement date set forth in the table above (the “Vesting Commencement Date”) and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years, (the “Time-Basedprovided that, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of a change in control of PMI, a sale of all or substantially all of PMI's assets, or a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of PMI (each, a “Corporate Transaction”).
3.These RSUs initially vest, if at all, when PMI files for an initial public offering and the lock-up period expires or there is a Corporate Transaction (which, as defined in the RSU grant notice, does not include a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of PMI), whichever occurs first (each, a “Triggering Event”). The RSUs will immediately and fully vest in connection with the occurrence of such Triggering Event.
4.This option vests over three years, with 1/36 vesting on the one month anniversary of the applicable Vesting Schedule”)Commencement Date and 1/36 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years, provided that, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of a Corporate Transaction.
5.This option vests over three years, with 1/2 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years, provided that, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of the Corporate Transaction.
75




6.This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years, except that, in the event the NEO is terminated without cause within 12 months of a Corporate Transaction, any unvested options will vest in full immediately.
7.These RSUs initially vest, if at all, upon the occurrence of a Triggering Event. The number of RSUs that vest upon a Triggering Event will be equal to the number of RSUs that would have vested had the RSUs been subject to the four-year Time-Based Vesting Schedule (1/4 vesting on first-year anniversary of applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting monthly thereafter). If the NEO provides continuous service through the Triggering Event, the remaining RSUs will vest pursuant to the Time-Based Vesting Schedule until the RSUs are fully vested. In addition,
8.This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the RSUs granted tofirst anniversary of the NEO will fully vestapplicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years.
9.This option vests over three years, with 1/36 vesting on the one month anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/36 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years.
10.This option vests over three years, with 1/36 vesting on the one month anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/36 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years, except that, in the event that the NEO is terminated without cause within 12 months of a Corporate Transaction.Transaction, any unvested options will vest in full immediately.
(4)This option vests over three years, with 1/36 vesting on the one month anniversary of the Vesting Commencement Date and 1/36 vesting each month thereafter on the same day of the month as the Vesting Commencement Date (and if there is no corresponding day, on the last day of the month), except that, in the event the NEO is terminated without cause within 12 months of a Corporate Transaction, any unvested options will vest in full immediately.
(5)This option vests over three years, with 1/2 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years, except that, in the event of a Corporate Transaction, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of the Corporate Transaction.
(6)This option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years.
(7)This option is subject to an early exercise provision and is immediately exercisable. This option vests over four years, with 1/2 vesting on the second anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years.
2017 Option Exercises11.Exercisable and Stock Vestedunexercisable option amounts shown as of NEO's termination date of November 1, 2019. All then-unexercisable options were unvested and cancelled effective as of such termination date.

The following table sets forth information regarding equity awards held by PMI's named executive officers that were exercised, vested or settled during 20172019 (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name 
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
 
Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
  
Value
Realized on
Vesting/Settlement
($) (1)
David Kimball 
 
 
  
Usama Ashraf 
 
 
  
Brad Pennington 
 
 14,220
  $3
Kunal Kaul 
 
 
  
Nasos Topakas 
 
 
  
(1)The amount reported as value realizedOption AwardsStock Awards
Number of
Shares
Acquired on vesting/settlement
Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)
Number of restricted stock units is calculated by multiplying the fair value of PMI's common stock as of the vesting date of the award by the number of RSUs.
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting/Settlement
($)
David Kimball— — — — 
Usama Ashraf— — — — 
Nasos Topakas— — — — 
Julie Hwang— — — — 
Kunal Kaul— — — — 
Justine Metz— — — — 



Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change In Control of PMI
The following table provides the estimated value of the payments that PMI would provide to its named executive officers in connection with a change in control of PMI and/or a termination of employment. In determining amounts payable, we have assumed in all cases that the change in control or termination of employment, as applicable, occurred on December 31, 2017.2019. With respect to a termination of employment, we have assumed in all cases that the termination was without cause.
76




Name Cash Severance ($) Number of Unvested Options (#) Estimated Value of Unvested Options at December 31, 2017 ($) Number of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards (#) Estimated Value of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards at December 31, 2017 ($) Total Estimated Value ($)NameCash Severance ($)Number of Unvested Options (#)Estimated Value of Unvested Options at December 31, 2019 ($)Number of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards (#)Estimated Value of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards at December 31, 2019 ($)Total Estimated Value ($)
 (dollar amounts in thousands)(dollar amounts in thousands)
           
David Kimball           David Kimball
Involuntary Termination $250
 
 
 
 $
 $250
Involuntary Termination$250  $—  $—  $—  $—  $250  
Change in Control   12,312,247
 $3,940
 705,465
 $381
 $4,321
Change in Control—  1,514,285  —  705,465  106  106  
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control 
 
 
 
 
 
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control—  —  —  —  —  —  
Usama Ashraf           Usama Ashraf
Change in Control 
 

$
 
 
 $
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control 
 3,800,000
 $1,091
 
 
 1,091
Brad Pennington           
Involuntary Termination $175
 


 
 
 $175
Involuntary Termination215  —  —  —  —  215  
Change in Control   
 
 
 
 $
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control 
 1,228,511
 $393
 
 $
 $393
Kunal Kaul          
Change in Control 
 
 
 
 
 $
Change in Control—  —  —  —  —  —  
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control 
 588,963
 $188
 125,000
 $68
 $256
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control—  2,149,362  —  1,784,793  268  268  
Nasos Topakas          
Nasos Topakas
Involuntary Termination $175
 
 
 
 
 $175
Involuntary Termination185  —  —  —  —  185  
Change in Control 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in Control—  —  —  —  —  —  
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control 
 3,800,000
 $38
 
 
 $38
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control—  1,266,667  —  1,784,793  268  268  
Julie HwangJulie Hwang
Involuntary TerminationInvoluntary Termination168  —  —  —  —  168  
Change in ControlChange in Control—  —  —  —  —  —  
Involuntary Termination following Change in ControlInvoluntary Termination following Change in Control—  3,278,252  —  —  —  —  
Kunal KaulKunal Kaul
Involuntary TerminationInvoluntary Termination—  —  —  —  —  —  
Change in ControlChange in Control—  —  —  —  —  —  
Involuntary Termination following Change in ControlInvoluntary Termination following Change in Control—  144,294  —  125,000  1919  
Justine MetzJustine Metz
Involuntary TerminationInvoluntary Termination168  —  —  —  —  168  
Change in ControlChange in Control—  —  —  —  —  —  
Involuntary Termination following Change in ControlInvoluntary Termination following Change in Control—  1,067,312  —  —  —  

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, Christopher M. Bishko (who resigned from PMI's Board of Directors on February 22, 2018)2019, Mason Haupt, Claire A. Huang and Patrick W. Grady served as members of the Compensation Committee. None of these directors is or has been an officer or employee of PMI at any time or had any relationship with PMI requiring disclosure by PMI under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, none of PMI's executive officers served as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee (or other board committee serving an equivalent function) of any unrelated entity that had one or more of its executive officers serving on PMI’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee (or other board committee serving an equivalent function).



77




Director Compensation
The following table shows compensation for the year ended December 31, 20172019 to PMI’s directors who were not also named executive officers at the time they received compensation as directors (in thousands):
Fees
earned or
paid in
cash ($)
Equity
awards ($)
Total
Patrick W. Grady—  —  —  
Rajeev V. Date (1)$75  —  $75  
David R. Golob (2)—  —  —  
Nigel W. Morris$75  —  $75  
Mason Haupt—  —  —  
Claire A. Huang (3)$75  —  $75  
Name 
Fees
earned or
paid in
cash ($)
 
Equity
awards ($)
  Total
Patrick W. Grady 
 
  
Rajeev V. Date $37.5
 
  $37.5
Christopher M. Bishko (1) 
 
  
David R. Golob 
 
  
Nigel W. Morris $37.5
 
  $37.5
Aaron Vermut (2) 
 
  
Claire A. Huang 
 
  
1.Mr. Date held 58,780 unvested stock options at December 31, 2019.
(1)Mr. Bishko resigned as a Director of PMI effective February 22, 2018.
(2)Mr. Vermut resigned as a Director of PMI effective September 21, 2017.
2.Mr. Golob resigned as a director of PMI effective October 1, 2019.
3.Ms. Huang held 500,000 unvested stock options at December 31, 2019.

From time to time, PMI reimburses certain of its non-employee directors for travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending board of directors meetings.



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee of PMI has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to PMI's Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Patrick W. Grady, Chair
Mason D. Haupt
Claire A. Huang


Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of PMI’s common stockCommon Stock as of March 1, 2018,2020, by:
each of PMI’s directors;
each of PMI’s named executive officers;
each person, or group of affiliated persons, who is known by PMI to beneficially own more than 5% of PMI’s common stock;Common Stock; and
all of PMI’s directors and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table below, all of the shares reflected in the table are shares of common stockCommon Stock and all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.
78




Percentage ownership calculations are based on 260,199,139269,081,297 shares of common stockCommon Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2018,2020, assuming the conversion of all of PMI’s convertible preferred stock, but excluding any outstanding stock options or warrants. Each share of PMI preferred stock is convertible at any time at the discretion of the holder. Shares of PMI’s Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock, Series D Preferred Stock, Series E Preferred Stock Series F Preferred Stock and Series GF Preferred Stock convert into shares of PMI common stockCommon Stock at a ratio of 1 to 1. Shares of PMI’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock convert into shares of PMI common stockCommon Stock at a ratio of 1,000,000 to 1. Shares of PMI’s Series G Preferred Stock convert into shares of PMI common stock at a ratio of 1 to 1.36.
In computing the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock beneficially owned by a person or entity and the percentage ownership of that person or entity, PMI deemed outstanding all shares of common stockCommon Stock subject to options and warrants held by that person or entity that are currently exercisable or vesting within 60 days of March 1, 2018.  Except as set forth in footnote 17 below,2020. PMI did not deem these shares outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1.0% is denoted with an asterisk (*). Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table below, addresses of named beneficial owners and officers are in care of Prosper Marketplace, Inc., 221 Main Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105.

Number of
Shares Owned (1)
Number of Shares Underlying Options, and Warrants Exercisable Currently or Within 60 Days (2)Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (3)
Beneficial
Ownership
Percentage
Directors and Executive Officers
Rajeev V. Date (4)26,115  1,101,184  1,127,299   
Patrick W. Grady (5)51,247,915  —  51,247,915  19.05 %
Nigel W. Morris (6)1,073,970  1,080,349  2,154,319   
Claire A. Huang—  583,333  583,333   
Mason D. Haupt (7)—  137,033  137,033   
David Kimball—  26,644,185  26,644,185  9.01 %
Usama Ashraf—  3,392,387  3,392,387  1.24 %
Nasos Topakas—  2,850,000  2,850,000  1.05 %
Julie Hwang—  1,428,871  1,428,871   
Kunal Kaul—  1,795,758  1,795,758   
Justine Metz—  —  —   
All directors and executive officers as a group (8)52,348,000  39,013,100  91,361,100  29.65 %
5% Shareholders
Francisco Partners (9)17,413,325  35,544,141  52,957,466  17.38 %
Sequoia Capital (10)51,247,915  —  51,247,915  19.05 %
LPG Capital GP Limited (11)50,776,886  —  50,776,886  18.87 %
Soros Fund Management LLC (12)723,902  52,081,959  52,805,861  16.44 %
Accel Partners (13)24,320,667  —  24,320,667  9.04 %
IDG Capital Partners (14)24,320,667  —  24,320,667  9.04 %
JPF LLC (15)—  41,833,904  41,833,904  13.46 %
New Residential Investment Corp. (16) 41,833,904  41,833,905  13.46 %
Third Point Ventures LLC (17)—  41,833,904  41,833,904  13.46 %
* Less than 1%

1.Includes shares of Common Stock (including Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock) owned directly or indirectly, but does not include shares subject to options and warrants.
2.Includes shares subject to options or warrants owned directly or indirectly that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2020.
3.The amounts and percentages of Common Stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the Commission, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares
79




Name of Beneficial Owner 
Number of
Shares Owned (1)
 Number of Shares Underlying Options, and Warrants Exercisable Currently or Within 60 Days (2) Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (3) 
Beneficial
Ownership
Percentage
Directors and Executive Officers        
Rajeev V. Date (4) 26,115
 523,284
 549,399
 *
Patrick W. Grady (5) 51,247,915
 
 51,247,915
 19.70%
David R. Golob  (6) 17,413,325
 
 17,413,325
 6.69%
Nigel W. Morris  (7) 1,073,970
 829,608
 1,903,578
 *
Claire A. Huang 
 
 
 *
Mason D. Haupt (8) 
 77,793
 77,793
  
David Kimball 
 14,898,041
 14,898,041
 5.42%
Usama Ashraf 
 1,108,332
 1,108,332
 *
Nasos Topakas 
 950,000
 950,000
 *
Brad Pennington 175,095
 2,391,875
 2,566,970
 *
Sachin Adarkar 
 1,486,074
 1,486,074
 *
Kunal Kaul 
 841,777
 841,777
 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (9) 69,936,420
 23,106,784
 93,043,204
 32.84%
5% Shareholders  
 

    
Sequoia Capital (10) 51,247,915
 
 51,247,915
 19.70%
Pinecone Investments LLC (11) 
 35,544,141
 35,544,141
 12.02%
LPG Capital GP Limited (12) 37,249,497
   37,249,497
 14.32%
PF WarrantCo (13) 723,902
 69,274,534
 69,998,436
 21.25%
Accel Partners (14) 24,320,667
 
 24,320,667
 9.35%
IDG Capital Partners (15) 24,320,667
 
 24,320,667
 9.35%
“voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities for which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
(1)Includes shares of common stock (including common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock) owned directly or indirectly, but does not include shares subject to options and warrants.
(2)Includes shares subject to options or warrants owned directly or indirectly that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 3, 2017.
(3)The amounts and percentages of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the Commission, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities for which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
(4)Consists of 523,284 shares of common stock
4.Consists of 1,101,184 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and 26,115 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Mr. Date or his affiliate.  
(5)Consists of 51,247,915 shares of common stock options and 26,115 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Mr. Date or his affiliate.  
5.Consists of 51,247,915 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Sequoia Capital through certain of its affiliates. Mr. Grady is a partner of Sequoia Capital and therefore may be deemed to share voting and investment power over these shares. Mr. Grady disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(6)Consists of 17,413,325 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Francisco Partners through certain of its affiliates. Mr. Golob is a partner of Francisco Partners and therefore may be deemed


to share voting and investment power over these shares. Mr. Golob disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(7)Consists of 1,005,935 shares of common stock, 68,035 shares of common stock
6.Consists of 1,005,935 shares of Common Stock, 68,035 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and 829,608 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by QED Investors through certain of its affiliates.  Mr. Morris is a partner of QED Investors and therefore may be deemed to share voting and investment power over these shares. Mr. Morris disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(8)Consists of 77,793 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants held by Mr. Haupt.
(9)Consists of 1,207,145, shares of common stock, 68,729,725 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock, 22,199,383 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options, 829,608 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants and 77,793 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants.
(10)Represents 51,247,915 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Sequoia Capital through certain of its affiliates. Sequoia Capital is deemed to have voting and investment power over the shares. The address for Sequoia Capital is 3000 Sand Hill Road, 4-250, Menlo Park, California 94025.
(11)
Represents 35,544,141 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by Pinecone Investments LLC, an affiliate of Colchis Capital Management, L.P. The members of Pinecone Investments LLC are all of the partners of Colchis Capital Management, L.P., or entities established by one or more of them. The address for Colchis Capital Management, L.P. is 150 California St., 18th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111.
(12)Represents 37,249,497 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by LPG Capital through certain of its affiliates. LPG Capital l is deemed to have voting and investment power over the shares. The address for LPG Capital is 199-203 Hennessy Road, Flat 1002, Hong Kong, China.
(13)Consists of (i) 2 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and 63,283,414 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants, in each case, held by PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “PF WarrantCo Shares”); (ii) 5,747,582 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants held by QPL Holdings (PF) LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “QPL Shares”); (iii) 243,538 shares of common stock and 1,080,349 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by QED Investors through certain of its affiliates. Mr. Morris is a partner of QED Investors and therefore may be deemed to share voting and investment power over these shares. Mr. Morris disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
7.Consists of 137,033 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants held by Mr. Haupt.
8.Consists of 1,005,935 shares of Common Stock, 51,342,065 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock, 37,795,618 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options, 1,080,349 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants and 137,033 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants.
9.Represents 17,413,325 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Francisco Partners through certain of its affiliates and 35,544,141 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by Francisco Partners through certain of its affiliates. Francisco Partners is deemed to have voting and investment power over these shares. The address for Francisco Partners is One Letterman Drive, Building C – Suite 410, San Francisco, CA 94129
10.Represents 51,247,915 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Sequoia Capital through certain of its affiliates. Sequoia Capital is deemed to have voting and investment power over the shares. The address for Sequoia Capital is 2800 Sand Hill Road, Suite 101, Menlo Park, California 94025.
11.Represents 50,776,886 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by LPG Capital through certain of its affiliates. LPG Capital l is deemed to have voting and investment power over the shares. The address for LPG Capital is 199-203 Hennessy Road, Flat 1002, Hong Kong, China.
12.Consists of (i) 2 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and 51,838,421 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants, in each case, held by QPL Holdings (PF) LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “QPL Shares”); (ii) 243,538 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants held by QPB Holdings Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “QPB Shares”); and (iv) 723,900 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Quantum Strategic Partners Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Quantum Strategic Shares”). 
QPL Holdings (PF) GP Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company is(the “QPB Shares”); and (iii) 723,900 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the general partnerconversion of PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP.   preferred stock held by Quantum Strategic Partners Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Quantum Strategic Shares”). 
Soros Fund Management LLC (“SFM LLC”) serves as principal investment manager to QPL Holdings (PF) GP Ltd.,for QPL Holdings (PF) LP, QPB Holdings Ltd., and Quantum Strategic Partners Ltd. As such, SFM LLC is deemed to have sole voting and dispositive powerhas been granted investment discretion over the QPL Shares, the QPB Shares and the Quantum Strategic Shares, and shared voting and dispositive power over the PF WarrantCo Shares. SFM LLC disclaims beneficial ownership of the PF WarrantCo Shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. George Soros serves as Chairman and Manager of SFM LLC and Robert Soros serves ashas sole discretion to replace FPR Manager LLC, the Manager of SFM LLC. The business address of SFM LLC is 250 West 55th Street, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10019. The registered address for QPL Holdings (PF) GP Ltd. is c/o Walkers Corporate Limited, Cayman Corporate Centre, 27 Hospital Road, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-9008, Cayman Islands.
(14)Represents 5,703,470 shares of common stock and 7,245,859 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Accel Partners through certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Accel Shares”); 3,498,765 shares of common stock and 4,722,733 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by IDG Capital Partners through certain of its affiliates (the “IDG Shares”); and 877,185 shares of common stock


13.Represents 5,703,470 shares of Common Stock and 7,245,859 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Accel Partners through certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Accel Shares”); 3,498,765 shares of Common Stock and 4,722,733 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by IDG Capital Partners through certain of its affiliates (the “IDG Shares”); and 877,185 shares of Common Stock and 2,272,655 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Breyer Capital, LLC and James W. Breyer 2005 Trust dated 2/25/2005 (collectively, the “Breyer Shares”). Accel Partners is deemed to have voting and investment power over the Accel Shares. Accel Partners is an affiliate of IDG Capital Partners and may also therefore be deemed to share voting and investment power over the IDG Shares. Mr. Breyer is a partner of Accel Partners and thereforetherefore Accel Partners may also be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Breyer
80




Shares. Accel Partners disclaims beneficial ownership of the IDG Shares and Breyer Shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The address of Accel Partners is 428 University Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94301.
(15)Represents 3,498,765 shares of common stock and 4,722,733 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by IDG Capital Partners through certain of its affiliates (“IDG Shares”); 5,703,470 shares of common stock and 7,245,859 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred held by Accel Partners through certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Accel Shares”); and 877,185 shares of common stock and 2,272,655 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Breyer Capital, LLC and James W. Breyer 2005 Trust dated 2/25/2005 (collectively, the “Breyer Shares”). IDG Capital Partners is deemed to have voting and investment power over the IDG Shares. IDG Capital Partners is an affiliate of Accel Partners and may also therefore be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Accel Shares. Mr. Breyer is a partner of Accel Partners, which is an affiliate of IDG Capital Partners, and therefore IDG Capital Partners may also be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Breyer Shares. IDG Capital Partners disclaims beneficial ownership of the Accel Shares and Breyer Shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The address for IDG Capital Partners is 99 Queen’s Road Central, Unit 1509, The Center, Hong Kong, China.
14.Represents 3,498,765 shares of Common Stock and 4,722,733 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by IDG Capital Partners through certain of its affiliates (“IDG Shares”); 5,703,470 shares of common stock and 7,245,859 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred held by Accel Partners through certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Accel Shares”); and 877,185 shares of Common Stock and 2,272,655 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Breyer Capital, LLC and James W. Breyer 2005 Trust dated 2/25/2005 (collectively, the “Breyer Shares”). IDG Capital Partners is deemed to have voting and investment power over the IDG Shares. IDG Capital Partners is an affiliate of Accel Partners and may also therefore be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Accel Shares. Mr. Breyer is a partner of Accel Partners, which is an affiliate of IDG Capital Partners, and therefore IDG Capital Partners may also be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Breyer Shares. IDG Capital Partners disclaims beneficial ownership of the Accel Shares and Breyer Shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The address for IDG Capital Partners is 99 Queen’s Road Central, Unit 1509, The Center, Hong Kong, China.
15.Represents 41,833,904 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by JPF LLC. JPF LLC has shared voting power and shared investment power with its parent, Jefferies Funding LLC, Jefferies Funding LLC’s parent, Jefferies Group LLC, and Jefferies Group LLC’s parent, Jefferies Financial Group Inc. The address for JPF LLC is 520 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022.
16.Consists of (i) 1 share of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock, held directly by New Residential Investment Corp.; and (ii) 41,833,904 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by NRZ PRO Warrant LLC (the “NRZ Shares”). NRZ Pro Warrant LLC is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of New Residential Investment Corp. New Residential Investment Corp. is deemed to have voting and investment power over the NRZ Shares. The address for New Residential Investment Corp. is 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 45th Floor, New York, NY 10105.
17.Represents 41,833,904 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by Third Point Ventures LLC. Third Point LLC, as investment manager of Third Point Ventures LLC, has voting power over such shares. The address for Third Point Ventures LLC is 55 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2017,2019, with respect to shares of PMI common stockCommon Stock that may be issued under PMI’s existing equity compensation plans.
Number of
shares of
common
stock to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants, RSUs
and rights (1)
Weighted
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
Number of
shares of
common
stock
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated5,520,920   0.14  —  
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended75,280,973  0.35  19,756,113  
80,801,893   0.34  19,756,113  
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders:
Outstanding Common Stock Warrants1,080,349  0.22  —  
All non-stockholder approved plans1,080,349  0.22  —  
81,882,242   0.34  19,756,113  
81




Plan Category 
Number of
shares of
common
stock to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants, RSUs
and rights (1)
 
Weighted
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
 
Number of
shares of
common
stock
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:      
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated 8,507,570  $0.16   
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended 51,281,644  $0.27  10,403,252 
All stockholder approved plans 59,789,214  $0.25  10,403,252 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders:      
Outstanding Common Stock Warrants 1,088,549  $0.22   
All non-stockholder approved plans 1,088,549  $0.22   
Total 60,877,763  $0.25  10,403,252 
(1)Includes option and RSU issuances to employees, directors and certain consultants, advisors or vendors; however it does not include warrants granted to outside individuals, consultants, advisors and vendors.

1.Includes option and RSU issuances to employees, directors and certain consultants, advisors or vendors; however it does not include warrants granted to outside individuals, consultants, advisors and vendors.
Prosper Funding LLC


PMI is the sole member of, and holds a 100% equity interest in, PFL. PFL does not have any equity compensation plans.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Agreements with PFL
On January 22, 2013, PMI entered into an Administration Agreement with PFL (as amended to date, the “PMI Administration Agreement”), pursuant to which PMI agreed to provide certain administrative services relating to the marketplace. Under the PMI Administration Agreement, PFL is required to pay PMI (a) an amount equal to one-twelfth (1/12) of the specified annual Corporate Administration Fees equal to 50% of finance and legal personnel costs, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan originated through the marketplace, (c) 90% of all servicing feesServicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) all nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of PFL. As of the most recent amendment of the PMI Administration Agreement, PFL is required to pay PMI (a) an Corporate Administration Fees of $500 thousand per month, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan originated through the marketplace, (c) 62.5% of all Servicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) all nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding.
Also on January 22, 2013, PFL and PMI entered into an Asset Transfer Agreement (the “Asset Transfer Agreement”) pursuant to which PMI, effective February 1, 2013 (i) transferred the marketplace and substantially all of PMI’s assets and rights related to the operation of the marketplace to PFL, and (ii) made a capital contribution to PFL in excess of $3 million. Under the Asset Transfer Agreement, PMI also transferred substantially all of its remaining assets to PFL, including (i) all outstanding Notes issued by PMI under the Indenture dated June 15, 2009 between PMI and Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee (“the Indenture”(the “Indenture”), (ii) all Borrower Loans corresponding to such Notes, (iii) all registration agreements related to such Notes and Borrower Loans, and (iv) all documents and information related to the foregoing. Certain hardware and agreements relevant to the development, maintenance and use of the marketplace, including in relation to the origination, funding and servicing of Borrower Loans, and the issuance, funding and payment of the Notes, were not transferred or assigned to PFL by PMI. In addition, PMI did not transfer to PFL (i) agreements with PMI’s directors, officers or employees and PMI’s financial, legal or other advisors or consultants, (ii) certain agreements with vendors to provide PMI with goods or services in the ordinary course of business (including software licensed pursuant to any “shrink wrap” or “click wrap” license), and (iii) certain cash and short-term investments.
In the Asset Transfer Agreement, PMI agreed, among other things, to:
(i)fund any repurchase obligation with respect to the transferred Notes, and indemnify PFL for any other losses that arise out of any registration agreement related to the transferred Notes or Borrower Loans, including as a result of a breach by PMI of any of its representations or warranties made therein;
(ii)fund any arbitration filing or administrative fees or arbitrator fees payable under any registration agreement related to the transferred Notes or Borrower Loans; and
(iii)fund any indemnification obligations that arise under any registration agreement entered into by PMI prior to the date of the asset transfer.
i.fund any repurchase obligation with respect to the transferred Notes, and indemnify PFL for any other losses that arise out of any registration agreement related to the transferred Notes or Borrower Loans, including as a result of a breach by PMI of any of its representations or warranties made therein;
ii.fund any arbitration filing or administrative fees or arbitrator fees payable under any registration agreement related to the transferred Notes or Borrower Loans; and
iii.fund any indemnification obligations that arise under any registration agreement entered into by PMI prior to the date of the asset transfer.
Holders of the transferred Notes are third party beneficiaries under the Asset Transfer Agreement and the Administration Agreement.
Under Section 4.1 of the Indenture, PMI could transfer substantially all of its assets to any person without the consent of the holders of the existing Notes, provided that the transferee expressly assumed all of PMI’s obligations under the Indenture and the existing Notes. In that case, the transferee would succeed to and be substituted for PMI, and PMI would be discharged from all of its obligations and covenants, under the Indenture and the existing Notes. Accordingly, on January 22, 2013, PMI, PFL and Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee entered an Amended and Restated Indenture (the “Amended and Restated Indenture”), effective February 1, 2013, which (i) effected such assumption, substitution and discharge (the “Note Assumption”), and (ii) amended and restated the Indenture to reflect the Note Assumption and to make certain other amendments to the Indenture as permitted therein. Following the Note Assumption, PFL became the obligor with respect to the transferred Notes and the Amended and Restated Indenture, and PMI no longer has any obligations with respect thereto.
82




Agreements with Prosper Asset Holdings LLC


On November 22, 2013, PMI entered into an Administration Agreement with Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a wholly owned subsidiary of PFL (the “PAH Administration Agreement)Agreement”), pursuant to which PMI agreed to provide PAH certain administrative services related to PAH’s operations. Under the PAH Administration Agreement, PAH iswas required to pay PMI an annual fee in the amount of $150,000.
Also on November 22, 2013, PMI and PAH entered into a Loan Servicing Agreement, pursuant to which PMI agreed to service certain Borrower Loans acquired by PAH under a Loan Sale Agreement entered into on the same date between PAH and PFL. In exchange for servicing these Borrower Loans, PAH agreed to pay PMI the servicing fee identified in the loan listing for each loan purchased by PAH.
Certain Relationships Among DirectorsOn November 28, 2018, the sole member and Officers
None
Participation inboard of directors of PAH executed a written consent approving the Marketplace
PMI’s executive officers,termination of PAH's LLC Agreement and dissolution and winding up of PAH. In connection with PAH's dissolution, the sole member and board of directors of PAH further approved the termination of the PAH Administration Agreement, the Loan Servicing Agreement, and certain affiliates, have opened investor accountsthe Loan Sale Agreement. PAH was dissolved on the marketplace and have made deposits to and withdrawals from their accounts, and invested in portions of borrowers’ loan requests from time to time in the past via purchases of Notes, and may do so in the future. The Notes and Borrower Loans were obtained on terms and conditions that were not more favorable than those obtained by other investors.November 29, 2018.
Agreements with Significant Shareholders
On February 27, 2017, PFL entered into a Loan Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with PF LoanCo Funding LLC, a Cayman limited liability company (the “Beneficiary”), and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as trustee of PF LoanCo Trust, a New York common law trust (the “Trust”). The Purchase Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which PFL will sell eligible consumer loans in an aggregate amount of up to $5.0 billion to the Purchaser for the benefit of the Beneficiary. As of December 31, 2017,2019, an aggregate of $1,826,527 thousand$3.3 billion of loans were purchased under the Purchase Agreement, which does not include $0.3 billion of Whole Loan purchases by members of the Consortium prior to the signing of the Purchase Agreement. The Consortium Purchase Agreement ended in May 2019.
In connection with the Purchase Agreement, on February 27, 2017, PMI entered into a Warrant Agreement with PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP (“PF WarrantCo”), a Delaware limited partnership and an entity related to the Beneficiary, (the “PF WarrantCo”), and, for certain limited purposes, New Residential Investment Corp. (the “Warrant“Series F Warrant Agreement”). Pursuant to the Series F Warrant Agreement, PMI issued to PF WarrantCo three warrant certificates to purchase up to in aggregate 177,720,706 shares of PMI’s Series F Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “Warrant Shares”).
During the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement, PF WarrantCo becamewas a beneficial owner of more than 5% of PMI’s common stock in connection with the vesting of portionsCommon Stock as a result of the Warrant Shares.Shares vesting. The Beneficiary is an affiliate under common control with PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP.WarrantCo.
For more information regarding these transactions, please see Note 1517, Consortium Purchase Agreement, of Prosper's Notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certain Relationships Among Directors and Officers
None.
Participation in the Marketplace
PMI’s executive officers, directors and certain affiliates, have opened investor accounts on the marketplace and have made deposits to and withdrawals from their accounts, and invested in portions of borrowers’ loan requests from time to time in the past via purchases of Notes, and may do so in the future. The Notes and Borrower Loans were obtained on terms and conditions that were not more favorable than those obtained by other investors.
Financing Arrangements with Significant Shareholders, Directors and Officers
For further information regarding stock ownership for executive officers, directors and security holders owning greater than 5% ownership of all PMI classes of voting securities please see “Item 12. SecurityItem 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.”
Under the terms of the amended and restated voting agreement, dated April 7, 2015, certain investors in PMI’s convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, have each agreed, subject to maintaining certain ownership levels, to exercise their voting rights so as to elect one designee of Francisco Partners III, L.P., one designee of SC Prosper Holdings LLC, one designee of QPL Holdings (PF) LP, one designee of the Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock holders, PMI’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), one common director designated by the CEO, and two independent directors.


Under the terms of the amended and restated investor rights agreement, dated February 27, 2017, the holders of a majority of the registrable securities of PMI have the right to demand that PMI file a registration statement under the Securities Act, so long as the anticipated aggregate offering price, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, would exceed $20
83




million. These registration rights are subject to specified conditions and limitations. In addition, PMI is promptly required to give written notice to all holders of registrable securities prior to the filing of any registration statement under the Securities Act for purposes of a public offering of securities of PMI. The amended and restated investor rights agreement also provides that if PMI registers any of its shares for public sale, stockholders with registration rights will have the right to include their shares in the registration statement, subject to specified conditions and limitations. Further, in the amended and restated investor rights agreement, if PMI receives from any holders of registrable securities a written request that PMI effect a registration on Form S-3 (or any successor to Form S-3) or any similar short-form registration statement, PMI is required to use reasonable best efforts to file a Form S-3 registration statement and to effect such registration as would permit or facilitate the sale and distribution of all or such portion of such holder’s registrable securities as are specified in the request, so long as the anticipated aggregate offering price, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, would exceed $2.5 million.
Indemnification Agreements
PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that it will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. In addition, PMI has entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executive officers. For more information regarding these agreements, see “Item 10. Directors,Item 10, “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.—Limitations on Officers’ and Directors’ Liability and Indemnification Agreements” for more information.
Policies and Processes for Transactions Involving Related Parties

PMI’s board of directors has not adopted a formal policy or procedure that must be followed prior to any transaction, arrangement or relationship with a related person, as defined by SEC regulations.

PMI has adopted a corporate Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance (the “Code”) that is enforced throughout all levels of management and deals with conflicts of interest, among other things. The Code requires PMI’s directors, officers and employees to avoid any conduct or activities that conflict, or appear to conflict, with Prosper’s interests, or that may make it difficult for the individual to perform his or her duties objectively. The Code also requires directors and executive officers to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest to PMI’s Chief Compliance Officer, who will report such conflicts to PMI’s Audit Committee for review.

PMI’s directors and executive officers are required each year to respond to a questionnaire regarding their independence. The questionnaire also requires each director and executive officer to identify if they or an immediate family member hadhave been indebted to, or hadhave been a participant in any material transactions with, PMI or any of its subsidiaries. Additionally, PMI’s directors and executive officers are required to disclose on a quarterly basis whether they or an immediate family member had made any direct or indirect investments on Prosper’s platform.

The standards applied pursuant to the above-described procedures are to provide comfort that potential conflicts of interest or related party transactions are identified and receivedreceive appropriate oversight and review.
Director Independence
For information regarding director independence, see “Item 10. Directors,Item 10, “Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.—Director Independence.”
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC
Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) served as PMI and PFL’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 and is serving in such capacity for the current fiscal year. Deloitte was engaged in October 2014.


The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional services to PMI and PFL were $1,845$2,045 thousand and $2,724$1,969 thousand in 2017December 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively.
Audit Fees.Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional services rendered for PMI and PFL for the audit of annual financial statements, the review of the quarterly financial statements, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $1,670$1,666 thousand and $2,316$1,824 thousand in 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. 
Audit Related Fees.Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the PMI and PFL’s financial statements, but not included under Audit Fees were $163$347 thousand and $361
84




$143 thousand in 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. These fees include merger and acquisition related due diligence,the service organization control readiness assessment and service organization control assessment.  
Tax Fees.Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for 20172019 and 20162018 for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $0 and $10 thousand in 2019 and $44 thousand in 2017 and 2016. 2018. 
All Other Fees.Fees
Deloitte billed $2$32 thousand and $2 thousand, in 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, related to fees not included in “Audit”, “Audit Related Fees” or “Tax Fees.”


85




PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
(a1) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for PMI
(a2) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Prosper Funding LLC
(b) Documents List
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule
Statements
(a) Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsProsper Marketplace, Inc.
(a1) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for PMI
(a2) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Prosper Funding LLC
(b) Documents List
1.Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Prosper Funding LLC




86




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.


Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Marketplace Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, other comprehensive loss, convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows, , for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"“financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, CA
March 23, 201820, 2020


We have served as the Company's auditor since 2014.




F-1





Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
 December 31, December 31,
ASSETS2017 2016
Cash and Cash Equivalents$45,795
 $22,337
Restricted Cash152,668
 163,907
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value53,147
 32,769
Accounts Receivable683
 757
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value49
 624
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value293,005
 315,627
Property and Equipment, Net18,136
 24,853
Prepaid and Other Assets7,796
 4,606
Servicing Assets14,711
 12,786
Goodwill36,368
 36,368
Intangible Assets, Net1,377
 9,212
Total Assets$623,735
 $623,846
LIABILITIES,  CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS'
   DEFICIT
 
  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$11,942
 $15,017
Payable to Investors132,432
 142,644
Notes, at Fair Value293,948
 316,236
Other Liabilities12,669
 17,173
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability116,366
 21,711
Total Liabilities567,357
 512,781
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 16)

 

Convertible Preferred Stock – $0.01 par value; 444,760,848 shares authorized; 214,637,925 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017; and 217,388,425 shares authorized, 177,388,425 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016. Aggregate liquidation preference of $375,952 and $325,952 as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
323,793
 275,938
Stockholders' Deficit 
  
Common Stock – $0.01 par value; 625,000,000 shares authorized; 71,226,934 shares issued, and 70,290,999 shares outstanding, as of December 31, 2017; 338,222,103 shares authorized; 70,843,044 shares issued and 69,907,109 outstanding as of December 31, 2016.228
 212
Additional Paid-In Capital136,653
 123,988
Less: Treasury Stock(23,417) (23,417)
Accumulated Deficit(380,806) (265,648)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(73) (8)
Total Stockholders' Deficit$(267,415) $(164,873)
Total Liabilities,  Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit$623,735
 $623,846
All share numbers reflect a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Revenues     
Operating Revenues     
Transaction Fees, Net$130,174
 $95,130
 $161,708
Servicing Fees, Net27,206
 28,903
 17,238
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans11,431
 3,637
 14,151
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans

(60,122) 
 
Other Revenues4,806
 5,245
 7,687
Total Operating Revenues113,495
 132,915
 200,784
Interest Income 
  
  
Interest Income on Borrower Loans47,208
 44,649
 41,606
Interest Expense on Notes(43,954) (41,187) (38,174)
Net Interest Income3,254
 3,462
 3,432
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(514) (372) 59
Total Net Revenues116,235
 136,005
 204,275
Expenses 
  
  
Origination and Servicing34,881
 33,944
 31,139
Sales and Marketing83,462
 70,146
 112,284
General and Administrative75,686
 102,735
 86,480
Restructuring Charges, Net1,340
 17,027
 
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Stock Warrants29,140
 7
 
Other Expenses, Net7,392
 30,341
 
Total Expenses231,901
 254,200
 229,903
Net Loss Before Taxes(115,666) (118,195) (25,628)
Income Tax Expense(508) 546
 340
Net Loss$(115,158) $(118,741) $(25,968)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted$(1.65) $(1.85) $(0.47)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted69,687,836
 64,196,537
 55,547,408
The weighted average number of shares and the net loss per share reflect a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016
 December 31,
20192018
ASSETS
Cash and Cash Equivalents$64,635  $57,945  
Restricted Cash (1)155,773  149,114  
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value—  22,173  
Accounts Receivable (1)1,695  5,119  
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value (1)142,026  183,788  
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value(1)634,019  263,522  
Property and Equipment, Net31,296  15,273  
Prepaid and Other Assets (1)5,694  4,643  
Servicing Assets12,602  14,687  
Goodwill36,368  36,368  
Intangible Assets, Net720  999  
Total Assets$1,084,828  $753,631  
LIABILITIES, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS'  DEFICIT   
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$19,937  $19,967  
Payable to Investors101,092  127,538  
Notes, at Fair Value244,171  264,003  
Notes Issued by Securitization Trust (1)347,662  —  
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value (1)52,168  —  
Warehouse Lines (1)131,583  162,488  
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability149,996  143,679  
Other Liabilities21,726  10,629  
Total Liabilities$1,068,335  $728,304  
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 18)
Convertible Preferred Stock – $0.01 par value; 444,760,848 shares authorized; 209,613,570 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019; 214,637,925 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018. Aggregate liquidation preference of $370,456 and $375,952 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively322,748  323,793  
Stockholders' Deficit  
Common Stock – $0.01 par value; 625,000,000 shares authorized; 69,387,836 shares issued and 68,451,901 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2019; 71,411,145 shares issued and 70,475,210 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2018208  229  
Additional Paid-In Capital151,416  145,486  
Less: Treasury Stock(23,417) (23,417) 
Accumulated Deficit(434,462) (420,751) 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss—  (13) 
Total Stockholders' Deficit(306,255) (298,466) 
Total Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit$1,084,828  $753,631  
(1) Includes amounts in consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) presented separately in the table below.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2






The following table presents the assets and liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets above. The assets in the table below may only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs and are in excess of those obligations. Additionally, the assets and liabilities in the table below include third-party assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs only and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. See Note 7 - Securitizations and Note 11 - Debt, to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Assets and Liabilities of VIEs, Included in Consolidated Balance SheetsDecember 31,
20192018
Assets
Restricted Cash$39,118  $—  
Accounts Receivable73  3,902  
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value142,026  183,788  
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value388,882  —  
Prepaid and Other Assets2,928  1,393  
$573,027  $189,083  
Liabilities
Notes Issued by Securitization Trust$347,662  $—  
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value52,168  $—  
Warehouse Lines131,583  162,488  
$531,413  $162,488  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3




Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
REVENUES  
Operating Revenues  
Transaction Fees, Net$119,282  $123,373  $130,174  
Servicing Fees, Net23,406  29,025  27,206  
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans10,946  13,147  11,431  
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(17,553) (72,316) (60,122) 
Other Revenues5,953  4,697  4,806  
Total Operating Revenues142,034  97,926  113,495  
Interest Income   
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale100,786  57,716  47,208  
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments(63,736) (45,886) (43,954) 
     Net Interest Income37,050  11,830  3,254  
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(25,514) (5,395) (514) 
Total Net Revenues153,570  104,361  116,235  
EXPENSES   
Origination and Servicing34,915  35,116  34,881  
Sales and Marketing73,824  77,997  83,462  
General and Administrative71,588  72,371  75,686  
Restructuring Charges, Net34  1,762  1,340  
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(11,235) (45,003) 29,140  
Other Expense (Income), Net(1,945) 1,891  7,392  
Total Expenses167,181  144,134  231,901  
Net Loss Before Income Taxes(13,611) (39,773) (115,666) 
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)100  172  (508) 
Net Loss$(13,711) $(39,945) $(115,158) 
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted($0.18) ($0.57) ($1.65) 
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted70,511,605  70,384,501  69,687,836  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4




Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Loss
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
Year ended December 31,201920182017
2017 2016 2015
Net Loss$(115,158) $(118,741) $(25,968)Net Loss$(13,711) $(39,945) $(115,158) 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  
Change in Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair ValueChange in Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value13  60  (74) 
Realized Gain on Sale of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair ValueRealized Gain on Sale of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value—  —   
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax 
  
  Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax13  60  (65) 
Change in Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value(74) 148
 (144)
Realized (Gain) Loss on Sale of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value9
 (12) 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax(65) 136
 (144)
Income tax effect
 
 
Income Tax EffectIncome Tax Effect—  —  —  
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax(65) 136
 (144)Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax13  60  (65) 
Comprehensive Loss$(115,223) $(118,605) $(26,112)Comprehensive Loss$(13,698) $(39,885) $(115,223) 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-5




Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Deficit
(in thousands, except for share amounts)
  Convertible Preferred Stock Common Stock Treasury Stock        
  Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income 
Accumulated
Deficit
 Total
Balance as of January 1, 2015 153,499,785
 $111,145
 72,243,500
 $102
 (935,935) $(303) $86,340
 $
 $(121,513) $(35,374)
Cumulative effect of adoption of fair value method for servicing rights 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 574
 574
Issuance of convertible
   preferred stock, Series D, net of issuance costs
 23,888,640
 164,793
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercise of vested stock
   options
 
 
 3,125,890
 8
 
 
 771
 
 
 779
Exercise of nonvested stock
   options
 
 
 76,045
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Repurchase of restricted stock 
 
 (1,493,775) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Repurchase of common stock 
 
 
 
 (4,241,300) (23,114) 
 
 
 (23,114)
Restricted stock vested 
 
 
 17
 
 
 471
 
 
 488
Restricted stock units sold 
 
 450,000
 
 
 
 1,630
 
 
 1,630
Exercise of warrants 
 
 207,065
 
 
 
 125
 
 
 125
Stock-based compensation
   expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 13,634
 
 
 13,634
Change in net unrealized loss on available for sale investments, at fair value 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (144) 
 (144)
Net Loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (25,968) (25,968)
Balance as of December 31, 2015 177,388,425
 275,938
 74,608,725
 127
 (5,177,235) (23,417) 102,971
 (144) (146,907) (67,370)
Exercise of vested stock
   options
 
 
 466,300
 6
 
 
 305
 
 
 311
Repurchase of restricted stock 
 
 (673,750) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted stock vested 
 
 
 79
 
 
 196
 
 
 275
Issuance of common stock, for settlement of vested RSUs 
 
 635,068
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercise of warrants 
 
 48,001
 
 
 
 11
 
 
 11
Stock-based compensation
   expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 20,505
 
 
 20,505
Change in net unrealized loss on available for sale investments, at fair value 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 136
 
 136
Net Loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (118,741) (118,741)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 177,388,425
 275,938
 75,084,344
 212
 (5,177,235) (23,417) 123,988
 (8) (265,648) (164,873)
Issuance of convertible
   preferred stock, Series G, net of issuance costs
 37,249,497
 47,855
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercise of vested stock
   options
 
 
 606,284
 6
 
 
 97
 
 
 103
Repurchase of restricted stock 
 
 (266,130) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted stock vested 
 
 
 10
 
 
 31
 
 
 41
Exercise of warrants 3
 
 43,736
 
 
 
 5
 
 
 5
Stock-based compensation
   expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12,532
 
 
 12,532
Change in net unrealized loss on available for sale investments, at fair value 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (65) 
 (65)
Net Loss 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (115,158) (115,158)
Balance as of December 31, 2017 214,637,925
 $323,793
 75,468,234
 $228
 (5,177,235) $(23,417) $136,653
 $(73) $(380,806) $(267,415)

The number of shares reflects a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016.
 Convertible Preferred Stock  Common StockTreasury Stock
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated
Deficit
Total
 Shares  AmountSharesAmountSharesAmount
Balance January 1, 2017177,388,425  $275,938  75,084,344  $212  (5,177,235) $(23,417) $123,988  $(8) $(265,648) $(164,873) 
Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G, net of issuance costs37,249,497  47,855  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  
Exercise of vested stock options—  —  606,284   —  —  97  —  —  103  
Repurchase of restricted stock—  —  (266,130) —  —  —  —  —  —  —  
Restricted stock vested—  —  —  10  —  —  31  —  —  41  
Exercise of warrants —  43,736  —  —  —   —  —   
Stock-based compensation expense—  —  —  —  —  —  12,532  —  —  12,532  
Change in net unrealized loss on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value—  —  —  —  —  —  —  (65) —  (65) 
Net Loss—  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  (115,158) (115,158) 
Balance December 31, 2017214,637,925  323,793  75,468,234  228  (5,177,235) (23,417) 136,653  (73) (380,806) (267,415) 
Exercise of vested stock options—  —  176,011   —  —  27  —  —  28  
Restricted stock vested—  —  —  —  —  —  13  —  —  13  
Exercise of warrants—  —  8,200  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  
Stock-based compensation expense—  —  —  —  —  —  8,793  —  —  8,793  
Change in net unrealized loss on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value—  —  —  —  —  —  —  60  —  60  
Net Loss—  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  (39,945) (39,945) 
Balance December 31, 2018214,637,925  323,793  75,652,445  229  (5,177,235) (23,417) 145,486  (13) (420,751) (298,466) 
Repurchase of Common Stock—  —  (2,196,665) (22) —  —  22  —  —  —  
Repurchase of Convertible Preferred Stock(5,024,355) (1,045) —  —  —  —  1,045  —  —  1,045  
Exercise of vested stock options—  —  173,356   —  —  24  —  —  25  
Restricted stock vested—  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  
Exercise of warrants—  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  
Stock-based compensation expense—  —  —  —  —  —  4,839  —  —  4,839  
Change in net unrealized loss on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value—  —  —  —  —  —  —  13  —  13  
Net Loss—  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  (13,711) (13,711) 
Balance December 31, 2019209,613,570  $322,748  73,629,136  $208  (5,177,235) $(23,417) $151,416  $—  $(434,462) $(306,255) 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-6




Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
For the Year
Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 201920182017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     Cash Flows from Operating Activities:      
Net Loss$(115,158) $(118,741) $(25,968)Net Loss$(13,711) $(39,945) $(115,158) 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities: 
  
  
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes514
 372
 (59)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:   
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, NetChange in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net27,306  5,307  514  
Depreciation and Amortization12,348
 13,220
 7,649
Depreciation and Amortization7,676  9,968  12,348  
Gain on Sales of Borrower Loans(14,138) (9,634) (14,561)
Amortization of Operating Lease Right-of-Use AssetAmortization of Operating Lease Right-of-Use Asset3,494  —  —  
Gain on Sale of Borrower LoansGain on Sale of Borrower Loans(11,924) (13,171) (14,138) 
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights12,074
 11,053
 4,860
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights12,476  13,148  12,074  
Stock-Based Compensation Expense12,238
 19,787
 13,011
Stock-Based Compensation Expense4,529  8,401  12,238  
Restructuring Liability1,343
 6,052
 
Restructuring Liability—  1,576  1,343  
Fair Value of Warrants Vested61,605
 
 
Change in Fair Value of Warrants29,140
 7
 
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration
 199
 1,001
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower LoansFair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans17,552  72,317  61,605  
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock WarrantsChange in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(11,235) (45,004) 29,140  
Other, Net377
 1,527
 216
Other, Net1,118  (1,281) 377  
Impairment Losses on Assets Held for Sale6,399
 
 
Impairment Losses on Assets Held for Sale—  —  6,399  
Warrants Issued for Contract Termination
 21,711
 
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: 
  
  Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:      
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value(2,619,130) (1,979,952) (3,517,467)Purchase of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value(2,320,560) (2,365,431) (2,619,130) 
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value2,619,709
 1,979,352
 3,525,759
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value2,241,569  2,178,498  2,619,709  
Restricted Cash Except for those Related to Investing Activities11,870
 (5,459) (68,896)
Accounts Receivable74
 1,677
 865
Accounts Receivable3,424  (4,435) 74  
Prepaid and Other Assets(3,208) 1,825
 (1,360)Prepaid and Other Assets1,350  4,581  (3,208) 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities(2,268) 379
 6,493
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities(106) 7,566  (2,268) 
Payable to Investors(10,212) 6,137
 72,013
Payable to Investors(26,446) (4,894) (10,212) 
Other Liabilities(2,496) (12,179) 1,888
Other Liabilities(4,590) (3,683) (2,496) 
Net cash provided by (Used in) Operating Activities1,081
 (62,667) 5,444
Net Cash Used in Operating ActivitiesNet Cash Used in Operating Activities(68,078) (176,482) (10,789) 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: 
  
  Cash Flows from Investing Activities:      
Purchase of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value(194,887) (217,582) (197,436)Purchase of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value(170,328) (177,101) (194,887) 
Principal Payments of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value192,054
 173,710
 151,893
Principal Payments of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value254,845  175,117  192,054  
Purchases of Property and Equipment(4,174) (10,760) (15,977)Purchases of Property and Equipment(10,312) (5,889) (4,174) 
Maturities of Short Term Investments1,280
 1,279
 1,274
Maturities of Short Term Investments—  —  1,280  
Purchases of Short Term Investments(1,262) (1,277) (1,277)Purchases of Short Term Investments—  —  (1,262) 
Purchases of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value(68,297) (11,725) (77,538)Purchases of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value(1,488) (23,266) (68,297) 
Proceeds from Sale of Available for Sale Securities31,232
 12,445
 4,022
Proceeds from Sale of Available for Sale Securities—  —  31,232  
Maturities of Available for Sale Securities16,600
 39,593
 
Maturities of Available for Sale Securities23,763  54,750  16,600  
Acquisition of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired
 
 (38,147)
Changes in Restricted Cash Related to Investing Activities(631) (7,225) (1,027)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(28,085) (21,542) (174,213)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing ActivitiesNet Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities96,480  23,611  (27,454) 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: 
  
  Cash Flows from Financing Activities:      
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes Held at Fair Value194,391
 217,767
 197,228
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes Held at Fair Value171,138  176,830  194,391  
Payments of Notes Held at Fair Value(191,828) (173,958) (151,838)Payments of Notes Held at Fair Value(167,419) (175,760) (191,828) 
Repayment of Borrowings
 
 (5,047)
Principal Payments on Notes Issued by Securitization TrustPrincipal Payments on Notes Issued by Securitization Trust(134,250) —  —  
Principal Payments on Certificate Issued by Securitization TrustPrincipal Payments on Certificate Issued by Securitization Trust(13,770) —  —  
Proceeds from Securitization IssuanceProceeds from Securitization Issuance8,962  —  —  
Proceeds from Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock, Net47,855
 
 164,793
Proceeds from Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock, Net—  —  47,855  
Proceeds from Exercise of Warrants and Stock Options including Early Exercise, and Issuance of Restricted Stock123
 541
 5,004
Repurchase of Common Stock and Restricted Stock(64) (80) (23,246)
Proceeds from Warehouse LinesProceeds from Warehouse Lines186,010  161,797  —  
Principal payments on Warehouse LinesPrincipal payments on Warehouse Lines(57,899) —  —  
Payment for Debt Issuance CostsPayment for Debt Issuance Costs(7,850) (1,428) —  
Proceeds from Exercise of Warrants and Stock OptionsProceeds from Exercise of Warrants and Stock Options25  28  123  
Repurchase of Common Stock, Convertible Preferred Stock and Restricted StockRepurchase of Common Stock, Convertible Preferred Stock and Restricted Stock—  —  (64) 
Taxes Paid for Awards Vested Under Equity Incentive Plans(15) (219) (2,387)Taxes Paid for Awards Vested Under Equity Incentive Plans—  —  (15) 
Contingent Consideration Paid
 (3,800) 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities50,462
 40,251
 184,507
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents23,458
 (43,958) 15,738
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of the Year22,337
 66,295
 50,557
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of the Year$45,795
 $22,337
 $66,295
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing ActivitiesNet Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities(15,053) 161,467  50,462  
Net Increase in Cash and Cash EquivalentsNet Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents13,349  8,596  12,219  
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the PeriodCash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period207,059  198,463  186,244  
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the PeriodCash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period$220,408  $207,059  $198,463  
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash Paid for Interest$43,776
 $40,369
 $38,168
Cash Paid for Interest$60,642  $45,320  $43,776  
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net171
 382
 1,483
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net$707  $630  $171  
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Amount Payable for the Acquisition of Business$
 $
 $4,488
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Consolidation of Third Party Borrower LoansNon-Cash Investing Activity- Consolidation of Third Party Borrower Loans$(391,383) $—  $—  
Non-Cash Financing Activity- Issuance of Securitization Notes and CertificatesNon-Cash Financing Activity- Issuance of Securitization Notes and Certificates$554,892  $—  $—  
Non-Cash Financing Activity- Derecognition of Warehouse Line DebtNon-Cash Financing Activity- Derecognition of Warehouse Line Debt$(158,857) $—  $—  
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance SheetsReconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets
Cash and Cash EquivalentsCash and Cash Equivalents$64,635  $57,945  $45,795  
Restricted CashRestricted Cash155,773  149,114  152,668  
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted CashTotal Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$220,408  $207,059  $198,463  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-7


Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



1. Organization and Business
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on March 22, 2005. Except as the context requires otherwise, as used in these Notesnotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements of Prosper Marketplace, Inc., “Prosper,” “we,” “us,”“Prosper”, “PMI”, and “our”the "Company" refer to PMIProsper Marketplace, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
PMI developed a peer-to-peer online credit marketplace (the “marketplace”), and in February 2013, transferred ownership of the marketplace to Prosper Funding LLC (“PFL”), its wholly-owned subsidiary. All of the borrower payment dependent notes (“Notes”) issued and sold through the marketplace today are issued and sold by PFL. PFL also operates the marketplace and facilitates the origination of unsecured, consumer loans by WebBank (“Borrower Loans”), an FDIC-insured, Utah-chartered industrial bank, through the marketplace. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the marketplace as agent of WebBank in connection with the submission of loan applications by potential borrowers,borrowers. PMI also manages the origination of related loans by WebBank and the funding of such Borrower Loans by WebBank. On February 1, 2013, PFL entered into an Administration Agreement with PMI in its capacity as licensee, corporate administrator, loan marketplace administrator and loan and noteNote servicer, pursuant to which PMI provides certain back office support, loan platform administration and loan servicing to PFL.
The marketplace is designed to allow investors to invest in Borrower Loans in an open, transparent marketplace, with the aim of allowing both investors and borrowers to benefit financially as well as socially. Prosper believes marketplace lending represents a model of consumer lending where individuals and institutions can earn the interest spread of a traditional consumer lender but must also assume the credit risk of a traditional consumer lender.
A borrower who wishes to obtain a Borrower Loan through the marketplace must post a loan listing on the marketplace. Listings are allocated to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on PFL’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from Prosper.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, the marketplace is open to investors in 30 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2017,2019, the marketplace is open to borrowers in 4648 states and the District of Columbia. Currently our marketplace does not operate internationally.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PMI and its wholly owned subsidiaries including PFL, PHLProsper Healthcare Lending LLC (“PHL”), BillGuard, Inc. (“BillGuard”), and BillGuard.its consolidated VIEs including Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”), Prosper Warehouse II Trust (“PWIIT”), Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-1 (“PMIT 2019-1”), Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-2 (“PMIT 2019-2”) and Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-4 (“PMIT 2019-4”). All intercompany balances and transactions between PMI and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. PMI and PFL’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StatesU.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures, including contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include but are not limited to the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, valuation of servicing rights and loan trailing fee liability, valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, stock-based compensation expense, intangible assets, goodwill, contingent consideration, restructuring liability, convertible preferred stock warrant liabilityIntangible Assets, Goodwill, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, Repurchase Obligations and contingent liabilities. ActualThese judgments, estimates and assumptions are inherently subjective in nature and actual results couldmay differ from those estimates.these estimates and assumptions.

F-9



Certain Risks
In the normal course of its business, Prosper encounters significant credit risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject Prosper to significant credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, available for sale investments, Borrower Loans held and restricted cash. Prosper places cash and restricted cash with high-quality financial institutions and is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent the amount recorded on the balance sheet exceeds federally insured amounts. Prosper invests cash equivalents in highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase, consisting primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, US treasury securities and US agency securities.
To the extent that payments on Borrower Loans (including Borrower Loans that have been sold) are not made, interest income and/or servicing income will be reduced. A series of Notes corresponding to a particular Borrower Loan is wholly dependent on the repayment of such Borrower Loan. As a result, Prosper does not bear the credit risk on such Borrower Loan.
Reclassifications
Due to the early adoption of ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2016, reclassifications were made to the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows to reflect employee taxes paid to a tax authority to satisfy the employer's statutory income tax withholding obligation in relation to the exercise of stock awards.  Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.    
During the year ended December 31, 2017, Prosper changed the presentation of its expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. A new line called “Change in the Fair Value of Convertible Stock Warrants” was created with the amounts included in this line previously classified as “Other Expenses, Net”.  Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
The determination of whether to consolidate aA variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which we have a variable interest requires a significant amount of analysis and judgment around whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE via a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest in a VIE exists if we have both the power to direct the VIE’s activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and a potentially significant economic interest in the VIE. The determination of whether an entity(VIE) is a VIE considers factors, such as (i) whether the entity’slegal entity that has either a total equity investment at riskthat is insufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) when a holder’swhose equity investment at risk lacks any ofinvestors lack the following characteristics of a controlling financial interest:interest. Prosper’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in the direct or indirect ability through voting rights or similar rights to make decisions about a legal entity’s activities that have a significant effect onentity, which change with fluctuations in the fair value of the entity’s success,net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the legal entity. 
As a result of the nature of the retained servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, we are a variable interest holder in certain special purposes entitiesparty that purchase these Borrower Loans.   For all of these entities we either do not havehas both the power to direct the activities that most significantly affectimpact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or we do not have athe right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant economic interest into the VIE. In no case are weProsper consolidates a VIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Prosper assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary therefore, we do not consolidate these entities.  
Management regularly reviews and reconsiders its previous conclusions regarding the status of an entity as a VIE and whether we are required to consolidate such VIE in the consolidated financial statements.on an ongoing basis.
Transfers of Financial Assets
Prosper accounts for transfers of entire financial assets or a participating interest in an entire financial asset as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from Prosper, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and Prosper has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold significantunconditional call options and has not written significant put options on the transferred assets.


In assessing whether control has been surrendered, Prosper sells loans or participating interests in loans via whole loan sale transactionsconsiders whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the fractional note channel. In certain instancesimpact of whole loan sales transactionsall arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the transfer, even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer. Prosper will sell whole loans to unconsolidated VIEs that then securitize the whole loans purchased.
Prosper recognizes ameasures gain or loss on the sale of financial assets by comparingas the net sales proceeds (including fair value of any servicing asset or liability and recourse obligation recognized) toreceived on the sale less the carrying amount of the loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale include the fair value of any assets sold. Transfersobtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and recourse obligations.
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Prosper uses fair value measurements in its fair value disclosures and to record Available for Sale Investments, Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Servicing Assets, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability at fair value on a recurring basis.
The fair value hierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable:
Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs.
When developing fair value measurements, Prosper maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments Prosper must utilize unobservable inputs in determining fair value due to the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. In instances where there is limited or no observable market data, fair value measurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust and Servicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, Prosper believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust and Servicing Assets are considered level 3 financial instruments. Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate their fair value, and key assumptions used in valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is 1.0% of the outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets that do not qualify for sale accounting are reported as secured borrowings. Accordingly,and the related assets remain on Prosper’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and continueliabilities to be reported and accountedreceive similar accounting treatment for as ifexpected losses which is consistent with the transfer had not occurred. Cash proceeds from these transferssubsequent cash flows to investors that are reported as liabilities, with related interest expense recognized overdependent upon borrower payments. As such, the lifefair value of a series of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the related assets.corresponding Borrower Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursed to such Note holders. As a result, the valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing in payments. The
F-10


effective interest rate associated with a group of Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee.
Refer to Note 8 for additional fair value disclosures.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with investment gradeinvestment-grade rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, US treasury securities and US agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
At times, our cash balances may exceed federally insured amounts and potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk. The Company believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to these balances based on its assessment of the creditworthiness of these financial institutions.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificate of deposit accounts held as collateral as required for long term leases, loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper hashave on ourthe marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.
Short Term Investments
Short Term Investments which are included in Prepaid and Other Assets consist of certificates of deposit with a term greater than three months but less than a year that are held as collateral as required for loan funding and servicing activities.
Available for Sale Investments
Available for sale securities consist of commercial paper with terms longer than three months, US treasury securities, US agency securities and corporate debt securities.  Available for sale investmentsSale Investments are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) included in stockholders' equity unless management determines that an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired.   
Management evaluates whether impairment of availableAvailable for saleSale debt securities areis other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on a quarterly basis. Debt securities with unrealized losses are considered OTTI if Prosper intends to sell the investment or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell such investment before any anticipated recovery. If management determines that an investment is OTTI under these circumstances, the impairment recognized in earnings is measured as the entire difference between the amortized cost and then-current fair value.
An investment is also OTTI if management does not expect to recover all of the amortized cost of the investment. In this circumstance, the impairment recognized in earnings represents estimated credit losses and is measured by the difference between the present value of expected cash flows and the amortized cost of the investment. Management utilizes cash flow models to estimate the expected future cash flow from the securities to estimate the credit loss. Expected cash flows are discounted using the investment's effective interest rate. The evaluation of whether Prosper expects to recover the amortized cost of an investment is inherently judgmental. The evaluation includes the assessment of several bond performance indicators, including the current price and magnitude of the unrealized loss and whether Prosper has received all scheduled principal and interest payments. There were no0 impairment charges recognized during the years ended December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016.2018.
Fair Value Measurement
Prosper measures the fair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with its fair value hierarchy which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures


determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. We apply this framework whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.
We define fair value in terms of the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The price used to measure the fair value is not adjusted for transaction costs. The fair value measurement also assumes that the transaction to sell an asset occurs in the principal market for the asset or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset. The principal market is the market in which Prosper would sell or transfer the asset with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset. In determining the principal market for an asset or liability, it is assumed that Prosper has access to the market as of the measurement date. If no market for the asset exists or if Prosper does not have access to the principal market, Prosper uses a hypothetical market.
Assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value:
Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.
Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologies for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation.
Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value is determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Financial instruments consist principally of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Available for Sale Investments, Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Accounts Receivable, Accounts PayableNotes and Accrued Liabilities, PayableCertificates Issued by Securitization Trust
Borrower Loans are funded either through the Note Channel or through the Whole Loan Channel. Through the Note Channel, Prosper purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues Notes to Investors, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liabilityinvestors and Notes. Servicing Assets and Liabilities are also subject to fair value measurement within the financial statements of Prosper. The estimated fair values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, and Payable to Investors approximate their carrying values because of their short term nature.
As observable market prices are not available forholds the Borrower Loans until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans. Borrower Loans funded and Notes issued through the Note Channel are carried on Prosper’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. 
In 2019, Prosper began financing the purchase of Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel through securitization transactions, which issued senior notes, risk retention interests, and residual certificates. Associated securitization trusts are deemed consolidated VIEs, and as a result the Borrower Loans held in the securitization trusts are included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value”, senior notes sold to third party investors in “Notes Issued by Securitization Trust”, and the risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 7 - Securitization for additional disclosures.
F-11


Prosper uses Warehouse Lines to purchase Loans Held for Sale and Notes,that may be subsequently contributed to securitization transactions or for similar assets and liabilities, Prosper believes the Borrower Loans,sold to investors. Loans Held for Sale and Notes should be considered level 3 financial instruments. In a hypothetical transaction as of the measurement date, Prosper believes that differencesare included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” in the principal marketplace in which the Borrower Loans are originated and the principal marketplace in which Prosper might offer those loans may result in differences between the originated amount of the loans and their fair value as of the transaction date. For Consolidated Balance Sheets.See Note 11 - Debt for more details on Warehouse Lines.
Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale are purchased from WebBank. Prosper places Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, Prosper stops accruing interest and reverses all accrued but unpaid interest as of such date. Additionally, Prosper charges-off Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value of loans 120 or more days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from debt sales in subsequent periods.
Prosper has elected the fair value is estimated usingoption for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans funded through the Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent design of the Notes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans held in consolidated securitization trusts are partially offset by changes in fair value of the Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. Changes in fair value of Loans Held for Sale are recorded through Proper's earnings and Prosper collects interest on Loans Held for Sale. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust are included in “Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow methodologies based uponmodel to estimate the fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. The key assumptions used in valuation assumptions includinginclude default rates and prepayment speeds, default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on the perceived credit risk within each credit grade.
The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is generally 1.0%estimates of the outstanding balance.  Therates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper records Servicing Assets and Liabilities at their estimated fair value electionvalues for Notes andservicing rights retained when Prosper sells Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to investors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, theunrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of Servicing Assets and Liabilities is recognized in Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a seriesloan sale is recorded in Gain on Sale of Notes is approximately equal toBorrower Loans while the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, adjusted forservicing rights, which is based on the 1.0%degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market servicing rate is recorded in Servicing Assets or Liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in Servicing Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the timing of loan purchase, note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursedConsolidated Balance Sheets.
Prosper uses a discounted cash flow model to such Note holders.  As a result,estimate the valuationfair value of the Notes usesloan Servicing Assets or Liabilities which considers the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0%contractual projected servicing fee and any differences in timing in payments. Any unrealized gains or losses


revenue that Prosper earns on the Borrower Loans, the estimated market servicing rates to service such loans, the prepayment rates, the default rates and Notesthe current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.
Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment consists of computer equipment, office furniture and equipment, leasehold improvements, software purchased or developed for whichinternal use and web site development costs. Property and Equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, and is computed using the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives of the assets are as follows:

Furniture and fixtures7 years
Office equipment5 years
Computers and equipment3 years
Leasehold improvements5-8 years
Software and website development costs1-5 years
The costs to develop software for the website and other internal uses are capitalized when management has authorized and committed project funding, when preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, and when it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Capitalized software and website development costs primarily include software licenses acquired, fees paid to outside consultants and salaries and payroll-related costs for employees directly involved in the development efforts.
Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria, together with costs incurred for training and maintenance, are expensed. Costs incurred for upgrades and enhancements that are considered to be probable to result in additional functionality are capitalized. Capitalized costs are included in Property and Equipment and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives. Software and website development assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in
F-12


circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset group to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value option has been electedof the software and website development asset group.
Leases
Management determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Property and Equipment, Net and in Other Liabilities, respectively. For certain leases with original terms of twelve months or less, PMI recognizes the lease expense as incurred and does not recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities.
If a contract contains a lease, management evaluates whether it should be classified as an operating or finance lease. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. As most of PMI's leases do not provide an implicit rate, management uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The operating lease ROU assets are evaluated for impairment utilizing the same impairment model used for Property and Equipment.
Goodwill and Intangibles
Goodwill associated with business combinations is computed by recognizing the portion of the purchase price that is not tied to individually identifiable and separately recognizable assets. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or whenever indications of impairment exist. Annual impairment testing occurs on October 1. Impairment exists whenever the carrying value of Goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Adverse changes in impairment indicators such as loss of key personnel, increased regulatory oversight or unplanned changes in operations could result in impairment. PMI did not recognize any Goodwill impairments during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Costs of internally developing any intangibles is expensed as incurred. Intangible Assets identified through the acquisitions of American Healthcare Lending and BillGuard include customer relationships, technology and a brand name. The customer relationship Intangible Assets are amortized on an accelerated basis over three to ten year periods. The technology and brand name Intangible Assets are amortized on a straight line basis over three to five years and one year, respectively.  
Payable to Investors
Payable to Investors primarily represents the obligation to investors related to cash held in an account for the benefit of investors and payments-in-process received from borrowers.
Warehouse Lines and Notes Issued by Securitization Trust
Warehouse Lines and Notes Issued by Securitization Trust are carried at amortized cost. Prosper defers specific incremental costs directly related to entering into the Warehouse Lines and issuing Notes Issued by Securitization Trust and subsequently amortizes them into interest expense over the life of the arrangements.
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability
Freestanding warrants to acquire shares that may be redeemable are accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”). Under ASC 480, vested freestanding warrants to purchase the Company’s convertible redeemable preferred stock are classified as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and carried at fair value because the warrants may conditionally obligate the Company to transfer assets at some point in the future. The Company records the warrants at fair value on issuance. The warrants are subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date, and any change in their fair value is recognized as “Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company will continue to adjust the liability for changes in fair value until the earlier of the exercise or expiration of the warrants, the completion of a deemed liquidation event or the conversion of convertible redeemable preferred stock into Common Stock.
F-13


Loan Trailing Fee Liability
On July 1, 2016, Prosper signed a series of agreements with WebBank which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the “Loan Trailing Fee”) paid to WebBank in connection with the performance of each loan sold to Prosper. These agreements became effective as of August 1, 2016. The Loan Trailing Fee is dependent on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers of the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by Prosper, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interest in the performance of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by Prosper to WebBank over the term of the respective loans and is a function of the principal and interest payments made by borrowers of such loans. In the event that principal and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, Prosper is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to Prosper is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination of such loan within Other Liabilities and recorded as a separate line itemreduction of “Transaction Fees, net”. Any changes in the statementfair value of this liability are recorded in “Servicing Fees, Net” on the consolidated statements of operations. The effectivefair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue primarily results from transaction and Servicing Fees and net interest rate associatedincome earned. Fees include Transaction Fees for our services performed on behalf of WebBank to originate a loan. PMI also has other smaller sources of revenue reported as Other Revenues, including referral fees, and securitization fees.
Transaction Fees
Prosper has a customer contract with WebBank to facilitate the origination of all Borrower Loans through Prosper’s marketplace. In exchange for these services, Prosper earns a grouptransaction fee from WebBank that is recognized when performance is complete and upon the successful origination of Notesa Borrower Loan. The transaction fee Prosper earns is lessdetermined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan that is facilitated on Prosper’s marketplace, and ranges from 1.00% to 5.00% of the original principal amount of each Borrower Loan that WebBank originates.  Prosper records the transaction fee net of any fees paid to WebBank because Prosper does not receive an identifiable benefit from WebBank other than the borrower loan that has been recognized at fair value.  
Servicing Fees
Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper typically pay Prosper a servicing fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the borrower loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper for the costs incurred in servicing the borrower loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received.
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans
Prosper recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. Prosper measures gain or loss on sale of Borrower Loans as the net proceeds received on a sale less the carrying amount of the Borrower Loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and repurchase obligations.
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Financial Instruments
Prosper recognizes interest rate earnedincome on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and interest expense on the corresponding Borrower Loan dueNotes using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the 1.0% servicing fee. See Note 4extent Prosper believes it to be collectable. Similarly, Prosper recognizes interest income on Loans Held for Sale and interest expense on the Warehouse Line using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper believes it to be collectable.
Other Revenues
Other Revenues consist primarily of securitization fees and credit referral fees. Credit referral fees are where partner companies pay us an agreed upon amount for successful referrals of customers from our marketplace. The transaction price is a roll-forwardfixed amount per referral and further discussionis recognized by the Company upon a successful referral. Securitization fees represent fees Prosper earns to facilitate securitizations for purchasers of the significant assumptions used to value Borrower Loans and Notes.is recognized as “Other Revenues” when the
F-14


securitization is completed. In some instances Prosper may also provide a guarantee, which requires a determination of the fair value of the guarantee and an allocation of the remaining transaction price to the securitization performance obligation.
As of December 31, 2019, Prosper had no contract assets, contract liabilities or deferred contract costs. As of December 31, 2019, Prosper had no unsatisfied performance obligations related to Transaction Fees or Other Revenues.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and are included in “Sales and Marketing” expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prosper incurred advertising costs of $32.8 million, $48.0 million and $66.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
Management determines the fair value of the Company's stock options issued to employees on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is impacted by the fair value of Common Stock as well as by changes in assumptions that include, but are not limited to, the expected Common Stock price volatility over the term of the option awards, the expected term of the awards, risk-free interest rates and the expected dividend yield.
PMI recognizes compensation expense for stock-based awards on a straight-line basis over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (the vesting period of the award). Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards expected to vest. PMI estimates future forfeitures at the date of grant and revises the estimates, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from estimates.
Stock-based awards issued to non-employees are marked-to-market up until the point that the awards measurement period has been achieved. Compensation expense for stock options issued to non-employees is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is recorded over the vesting period of the award.
Foreign Currency Transactions
The functional currency of Prosper's international subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. For this subsidiary, foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates and foreign currency denominated nonmonetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at historical exchange rates. Gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement and settlements are included in “General and Administrative” expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Repurchase of Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock
Upon repurchase of Convertible Preferred Stock, Prosper recognizes the difference between repurchase price and the carrying amount of the Convertible Preferred Stock in Additional Paid-In Capital. Additionally, if Common Stock is repurchased for constructive retirement, the difference between the repurchase price and par value of the Common Stock is recorded through Additional Paid-In Capital.
Income Taxes
The asset and liability method is used to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement carrying values and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Prosper’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within its provision for income taxes. U.S. Federal, Israel, California and other state income tax returns are filed. Prosper is not currently undergoing any income tax examinations. Due to the cumulative the net operating loss, generally all tax years remain open.
Prosper recognizes benefits from uncertain tax positions only if management believes that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement.
Other Expense (Income), Net
Other Expense, Net includes interest income from Available for Sale Investments, sublease income, SEC settlement costs and contract termination costs that are expected to be non-recurring and not part of restructuring activities.
F-15


Restructuring Charges
Restructuring chargesCharges consist of severance costs and contract termination relatedtermination-related costs and impairment charges associated with the severance actions. A liability for severance costs is typically recognized when the plan of termination has been communicated to the affected employees and is measured at its fair value at the communication date. Contract termination costs consist primarily of costs that will continue to be incurred under operating leases for their remaining terms without economic benefit to the Company. A liability for contract termination costs is recognized at the date the Company ceases using the rights conveyed by the lease contract and is measuredrecorded at its fair value, which is determined based on the remaining contractual lease rentals reduced by estimated sublease rentals.
Borrower Loans and Notes
Through the Note Channel, Prosper purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues Notes, and holds the Borrower Loans until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notes originated through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loan. Borrower Loans and Notes originated through the Note Channel are carried on Prosper’s consolidated balance sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. We choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful for the readers of the financial statements and it allows both the Borrower Loans and Notes to be valued using the same methodology. The fair value election, with respect to an item, may not be revoked once an election is made. Prosper estimates the fair value of such Borrower Loans and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologies adjusted for the expected prepayment, loss, recovery and default rates.   The Borrower Loans are not derecognized when a corresponding Note is issued as Prosper maintains the ability to sell the Borrower Loans without the approval of the holders of the corresponding Notes.  
Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper records servicing assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when Prosper sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of servicing assets and liabilities is recognized in “Servicing Fees” revenue. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in “Gain on Sale” while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market servicing rate is recorded in servicing assets or liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in “Servicing Assets” and “Other Liabilities,” respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets.
Prosper uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan servicing assets or liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that Prosper earns on the Borrower Loans, estimated market servicing rates to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and the current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans Held for Sale are comprised of Borrower Loans held for short durations and are recorded at fair value. The fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions similar to those of other Borrower Loans. We measure Loans Held for Sale at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful for the readers of the financial statements and it allows for the Loans Held for Sale to be measured at fair value similar to Borrower Loans and Notes. The fair value election, with respect to an item, may not be revoked once an election is made. 


Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of computer equipment, office furniture and equipment, leasehold improvements, software purchased or developed for internal use and web site development costs. Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, and are computed using the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives of the assets are as follows:
Furniture and fixtures7 years
Office equipment5 years
Computers and equipment3 years
Leasehold improvements5-8 years
Software and website development costs1-5 years
The costs to develop software for the website and other internal uses are capitalized when management has authorized and committed project funding, preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Capitalized software and website development costs primarily include software licenses acquired, fees paid to outside consultants, and salaries and payroll related costs for employees directly involved in the development efforts.
Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria, together with costs incurred for training and maintenance, are expensed. Costs incurred for upgrades and enhancements that are considered to be probable to result in additional functionality are capitalized. Capitalized costs are included in property and equipment and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives. Software and website development assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset group to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software and website development asset group.
Goodwill and Intangibles
Goodwill associated with business combinations is computed by recognizing the portion of the purchase price that is not tied to individually identifiable and separately recognizable assets. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or whenever indications of impairment exist. Our annual impairment testing date is October 1. Impairment exists whenever the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Adverse changes in impairment indicators such as loss of key personnel, increased regulatory oversight, or unplanned changes in our operations could result in impairment. We did not recognize any goodwill impairments during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Costs of internally developing any intangibles is expensed as incurred. Intangible assets identified through the acquisitions of American Healthcare Lending and BillGuard include customer relationships, technology and a brand name. The customer relationship intangible assets are amortized on an accelerated basis over three to ten year periods. The technology and brand name intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis over three to five years and one year, respectively.  
Payable to Investors
Payable to investors primarily represents our obligation to investors related to cash held in an account for the benefit of investors and payments-in-process received from borrowers.
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock Warrant Liabilities
Freestanding warrants to acquire shares that may be redeemable are accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity "ASC" 480"). Under ASC 480, vested freestanding warrants to purchase the Company’s convertible redeemable preferred stock are classified as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets and carried at fair value because the warrants may conditionally


obligate the Company to transfer assets at some point in the future. The Company initially measured the warrants at fair value on issuance. The warrants are subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date, and any change in their fair value is recognized as a component of change in fair value of convertible stock warrants, in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company will continue to adjust the liability for changes in fair value until the earlier of the exercise or expiration of the warrants, the completion of a deemed liquidation event, or the conversion of convertible redeemable preferred stock into common stock.

Loan Trailing Fee
On July 1, 2016, Prosper signed a series of agreements with WebBank which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the "Loan Trailing Fee") paid to WebBank in connection with the performance of each loan sold to Prosper. These agreements are effective as of August 1, 2016. The Loan Trailing Fee is dependent on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers of the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by Prosper, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interest in the performance of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by Prosper to WebBank over the term of the respective loans and is a function of the principal and interest payments made by borrowers of such loans. In the event that principal and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, Prosper is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to Prosper is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination of such loan within Other Liabilities and recorded as a reduction of Transaction Fees, net. Any changes in the fair value of this liability are recorded in Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net on the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue primarily results from fees and net interest income earned. Fees include transaction fees for our services performed on behalf of WebBank to originate a loan and servicing fees paid by investors. We also have other smaller sources of revenue reported as other revenue, this includes referral fees, securitization fees and subscription fees.
Transaction Fees
Prosper earns a transaction fee upon the successful origination of all Borrower Loans facilitated through Prosper’s marketplace.  Prosper receives payments from WebBank as compensation for the activities Prosper performs on behalf of WebBank. The transaction fee Prosper earns is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan that is facilitated on Prosper’s marketplace, and ranges from 1.00% to 5.00% of the original principal amount of such Borrower Loan that WebBank originates.  Prosper records the transaction fee net of any fees paid to WebBank because Prosper does not receive an identifiable benefit from WebBank other than the Borrower Loan that has been recognized at fair value.  
Servicing Fees
Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper typically pay Prosper a servicing fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. Historically the servicing fee was set at 1.0% per annum and was increased to 1.075% per annum in August 2016 for loans originated after July 2016. The servicing fee compensates Prosper for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records servicing fees from Investors as a component of operating revenue when received.
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans
Prosper recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it is retained for the servicing of Borrower Loans by WebBank. Additionally, Prosper recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. Gains or losses on sales of Borrower Loans that are recognized at the time of sale are determined by the difference between the net sales proceeds, fair value of any servicing rights retained and the carrying value of the Borrower Loans sold.
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans


Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans relates to warrants to purchase Series F Convertible Preferred Stock issued to the Consortium that vest when the Consortium purchases whole loans under the Consortium Purchase Agreement that was signed in February 2017. On vesting of the Series F warrants, Prosper records a liability as "Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value and a corresponding amount as "Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans" on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. ASC 505-50 “Share Based Payments to Non-Employees" addresses the accounting by both the grantor and the grantee for share-based payments made in exchange for goods and services. The counterparty to whom we issued the warrants is a customer of the Company to whom we sell loans. Following the guidance in ASC 505-50, Prosper records the vesting of the warrants as contra-revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
InterestComprehensive Income on Borrower Loans, and Interest Expense on Notes
Prosper recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and interest expense on the corresponding Notes using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper believes it to be collectable.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and are included in sales and marketing expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prosper incurred advertising costs of $66.9 million, $48.1 million and $60.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
We determine the fair value of our stock options issued to employees on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is impacted by the fair value of our common stock, as well as changes in assumptions that include, but are not limited to, the expected common stock price volatility over the term of the option awards, the expected term of the awards, risk-free interest rates and the expected dividend yield.
We recognize compensation expense for our stock based awards on a straight-line basis over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (the vesting period of the award). Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards expected to vest. We estimate future forfeitures at the date of grant and revise the estimates, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Stock-based awards issued to non-employees are marked-to-market up until the point that the awards measurement period has been achieved.  Compensation expense for stock options issued to nonemployees is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is recorded over the vesting period of the award.
Foreign Currency Transactions
The functional currency of our international subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. For this subsidiary, foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates and foreign currency denominated nonmonetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at historical exchange rates. Gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement and settlements are included in general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Income Taxes
The asset and liability method is used to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement carrying values and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.


Prosper’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within its provision for income taxes. U.S. Federal, Israel, California, and other state income tax returns are filed. Prosper is currently not undergoing any income tax examinations. Due to the net operating loss, generally all tax years remain open.
We recognize benefits from uncertain tax positions only if we believe that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. 
Other (Income) Expense, net
Other (income) expense, net includes interest income from available for sale securities, accretion on available for sale securities, changes in fair value of contingent liabilities, realized gains and losses on the sale of available for sale securities, changes in fair value of convertible preferred stock warrant liabilities and contract termination costs that are expected to be non-recurring and not part of restructuring activities.
Comprehensive Income
Marketable debt securities are generally considered available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, based on quoted market prices or other readily available market information. Gains and losses are recognized when realized using the specific identification method and included in Other Income“Other Expense (Income)”, Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which is reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ deficitStockholders’ Deficit in ourProsper's Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. If we havemanagement has determined that an other-than-temporary decline in fair value has occurred, the amount of the decline that is related to an identified loss is recognized in income.earnings. Prosper monitors its investment portfolio for potential impairment on a quarterly basis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, 2016-08, 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2016-20, collectively implemented as FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 ("ASC 606") Revenue from Contracts with Customers, provides guidance for revenue recognition.Adopted In The new guidance sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed in U.S. GAAP. The underlying principle of the new standard is that a business or other organization will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not addressed completely in the prior accounting guidance. Prosper plans to adopt ASC 606 on a modified retrospective basis in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.  Our implementation efforts to date related to this standard have included identifying revenue streams that are within the scope of this guidance, the evaluation of associated contracts and accounting policies, the evaluation of processes and systems of internal control, and the assessment of disclosure requirements of the standard.  Our scoping analysis indicates that transaction fees and referral fees are included in the scope of the new guidance, while servicing fees and gain or loss on the sale of borrower loans remain within the scope of ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. We have determined that ASC 606 will have little, if any, impact on the timing and amount of revenue recognition as compared to the current standard and that there will be no material impact upon adoption. As part of our implementation process to date, we are evaluating new qualitative and quantitative disclosures, including disaggregation of revenues and descriptions of performance obligations. Prosper will make such disclosures in the first quarter of 2018.Current Period
In January 2016,June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-1, "Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10)No. 2018-07, “Stock Compensation (Topic 718): RecognitionImprovements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The ASU is intended to reduce the cost and Measurementcomplexity and to improve financial reporting for nonemployee share-based payments. The ASU expands the scope of Financial AssetsTopic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which currently only includes share-based payments to employees, to include share-based payments issued to nonemployees for goods or services. Consequently, the accounting for share-based payments to nonemployees and Financial Liabilities", which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This guidanceemployees will be substantially aligned. Prosper adopted the standard effective for us in the first quarterJanuary 1, 2019. The adoption of our fiscal year 2019, and early adoption isthis standard did not permitted. Prosper is currently evaluating thehave a material impact that this guidance will have on itsProsper’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-2, "Leases2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)", which requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. This guidance will beProsper adopted the standard effective for us inJanuary 1, 2019. In accordance with ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842), Target Improvements”, Prosper has elected not to restate prior periods and has presented the first quartercumulative effect of our fiscal year 2019, and early adoption is permitted. Prosper is currently evaluatingapplying the impact that this guidance will havenew standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on its consolidated financial statements, however we do


expect that this guidance will haveJanuary 1, 2019. The standard had a material impact on Prosper's consolidated financial statements. Asthe Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, but did not materially impact the Consolidated Statements of December 31, 2017,Operations. The most significant impact is the recognition of ROU assets and lease obligation liabilities for operating leases. Additionally, Prosper hasrecorded an impairment charge to its ROU asset upon adoption due to existing sublease arrangements that were entered into at a total of $31.6 million in non-cancelable operating lease commitments, net of minimum sublease rentals.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting(Topic 718)".  This guidance makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. This guidance was effective for us in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2017, and early adoption was permitted. Prosper decided to early adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2016, the adoption of this standardloss. The impairment charge did not have a material impact as it will be offset by a reduction of the existing restructuring liability for those leases.
In the adoption of the various accounting standards associated with Topic 842, Prosper has elected the package of practical expedients, which allows the Company not to reassess (1) whether any expired or existing contracts as of the adoption date are or contain a lease, (2) lease classification for any expired or existing leases as of the adoption date and (3) initial direct costs for any existing leases as of the adoption date. Prosper did not elect to apply the hindsight practical expedient when determining lease term and assessing impairment of right-of-use assets. Prosper also elected a practical expedient that allowed the Company to not separate non-lease components from lease components and instead to account for each lease and non-lease component as a single lease component. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 on Prosper’s consolidated financial statements. January 1, 2019 resulted in the recognition of ROU assets of approximately $16.2 million, lease liabilities for operating leases of approximately $21.7 million, a reduction in existing Other Liabilities of $5.5 million related to deferred rent and restructuring liabilities, and no cumulative-effect adjustment on retained earnings on Prosper's Consolidated Balance Sheets, with no material impact to its Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Accounting Standards Issued, to be Adopted by the Company in Future Periods
In AugustJune 2016, the FASB issuedamended guidance related to impairment of financial instruments as part of ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The standard provides guidance for eight targeted changes with respect to how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statements of cash flows, with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. This guidanceCredit Losses on Financial Instruments”, which will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. For loans accounted for at amortized cost, the guidance replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with an expected credit loss model for which a company recognizes an allowance based on the estimate of expected credit loss. Because Prosper inaccounts for Borrower Loans at fair
F-16


value, Prosper expects no impact on its loan portfolios upon adoption. For certain Available for Sale Investments, the first quarterguidance will require recognition of our fiscal year 2018,expected credit losses through recording an allowance for credit losses. As Prosper has no Available for Sale Investments at the effective date of Topic 326, Prosper does not expect the targeted amendments to the Available for Sale Investments debt securities impairment model to have an impact on its consolidated financial statements. Based on the composition of Prosper's Accounts Receivable and early adoption is permitted. Prosper is currently evaluating the impacts the adoption of this accounting standard will have on Prosper's statement of cash flows, howeverhistorical collection activity, we do not expect a material impact.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers Other than Inventory (ASU 2016-16)", which requires companies to recognize the income-tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. This guidance will be effective for us in the first quarter of 2018, with the option to adopt it in the first quarter of 2017. Prosper will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2018, and we believe the adoption of this standard will notTopic 326 would have a material impact on Prosper’sits consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18)", which requires companies to include amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance will be effective for us in the first quarter of 2018 and early adoption is permitted. Prosper will adopt this standard on January 1, 2018. As at December 31, 2017, we had restricted cash of $152.7 million. Currently, changes in these balances are presented as operating and investing cash activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Under the new guidance, changes in these amounts will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles“Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment".Impairment.” The standard eliminates Step 2 from the goodwillGoodwill impairment test which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Prosper will continue to have the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwillGoodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The standard should be applied on a prospective basis. Prosper is currently evaluatingdoes not expect the impactadoption of this accountingguidance to impact its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, but entities are permitted to early adopt either the entire standard updateor only the provisions that eliminate or modify the requirements. The guidance only affects disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements and will not affect Prosper’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.” This ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. Prosper will prospectively capitalize all eligible costs related to cloud computing arrangements starting January 1, 2020.
In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-01, “Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements.” This ASU aligns the fair value treatment of the underlying asset by lessors that are not manufacturers or dealers as defined under Topic 842, presentation on the Statement of Cash Flows for sales and direct financing leases, and a clarification of interim disclosure requirements in the year of adoption, among other things. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. Prosper does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3. Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipmentEquipment, Net consist of the following (in thousands):

 December 31,
 20192018
Operating lease right-of-use assets16,213  —  
Computer equipment13,420  15,193  
Internal-use software and website development costs28,904  22,505  
Office equipment and furniture2,999  3,015  
Leasehold improvements7,158  7,157  
Assets not yet placed in service2,445  2,745  
Property and equipment71,139  50,615  
     Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization(39,843) (35,342) 
Total Property and Equipment, Net$31,296  $15,273  


 December 31,
 2017 2016
Property and equipment: 
  
Computer equipment$14,499
 $14,107
Internal-use software and website development costs19,910
 16,750
Office equipment and furniture3,010
 3,010
Leasehold improvements7,078
 7,038
Assets not yet placed in service1,216
 1,222
Property and equipment45,713
 42,127
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(27,577) (17,274)
Total property and equipment, net$18,136
 $24,853
Depreciation and amortization expense for propertyProperty and equipmentEquipment for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016was $7.4 million, $9.6 million and 2015 was $10,963 thousand, $9,381 thousand$11.0 million, respectively. These expenses are included in "General and $6,080 thousand, respectively.Administrative" expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prosper capitalized internal-use software and website development costs in the amount of $3,687 thousand, $6,251 thousand$9.3 million, $5.7 million and $7,348 thousand$3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018
F-17


and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Prosper recorded gains on disposals of $11 thousand, impairmentImpairment charges of $1,083 thousand and $0were not material for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015 respectively, as a result of our decision to discontinue several software and website development projects and to cease2017. Additionally, disclosures around the use of certain leased properties and related leasehold improvements, computer equipment and furniture at these locations.operating lease right-of-use assets are included in Note 18.

4. Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Held at Fair Value
The fair value of the Borrower Loans originated and Notes issued through the Note Channel is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default rates and recoveries derived from historical performance, market conditions and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notesnotes is equal to the payments, if any, received on the corresponding Borrower Loan,borrower loan, net of the servicing fee. As such, the fair value of the Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently disbursed to the Notenote holders. The effective interest rate associated with aany series of Notesnotes will be less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loanborrower loan due to the servicing fee.
In 2019, Prosper began financing the purchase of Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel through securitization transactions. Associated securitization trusts are deemed consolidated VIEs, and as a result the Borrower Loans held in the securitization trusts are included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 7 - Securitization for additional information. At December 31, 2017 and 2016,2019, $388.9 million in Borrower Loans Notesat fair value are held in the consolidated securitization trusts.
The fair value of Borrower Loans is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value such borrower loans include default and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
In 2018, Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”), a consolidated VIE, began purchasing Loans Held for Sale from the Company through a warehouse arrangement with a national banking association. Similarly, Prosper Warehouse II Trust (“PWIIT”) began purchasing such loans in 2019 (collectively “Warehouse Loans”). See Note 11 - Debt for more details. Prosper utilizes Warehouse Lines to finance Loans Held for Sale that may be subsequently contributed to securitization transactions or sold to investors. The fair value of the Loans Held for Sale is estimated using the same methodology as the one utilized for Borrower Loans valuation.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, both at fair value, were as follows (in thousands) were::
 Borrower LoansLoans Held for Sale
 2019201820192018
Aggregate principal balance outstanding$647,209  $269,093  $143,261  $185,657  
Fair value adjustments(13,190) (5,571) (1,235) (1,869) 
Fair value$634,019  $263,522  $142,026  $183,788  
 Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Aggregate principal balance
   outstanding
$296,668
 $319,143
 $(300,922) $(323,358) $59
 $641
Fair value adjustments(3,663) (3,516) 6,974
 7,122
 (10) (17)
Fair value$293,005
 $315,627
 $(293,948) $(316,236) $49
 $624

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Notes, at Fair Value, was as follows (in thousands):
Notes
20192018
Aggregate principal balance outstanding$250,281  $272,430  
Fair value adjustments(6,110) (8,427) 
Fair value244,171  $264,003  

Borrower Loans
At December 31, 2017,2019, outstanding Borrower Loans had original maturities betweenof either 36 andmonths or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 32.32%31.92% and had various maturity dates through December 2022.2024. At December 31, 2016, Loans Held for Sale and2018, outstanding Borrower Loans had original terms between 36 months and 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.32%5.31% to 33.04%31.92% and had various maturity dates through December 2021.
Approximately $1.7 million and $2.4 million represents the loss that is attributable to changes in the instrument specific credit risks related to Borrower Loans that were recorded in the change in fair value during the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.


2023.
As of December 31, 20172019, the Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $3.5$6.5 million and a fair value of $1.3$1.9 million. As of December 31, 20162018, the Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $3.2$2.5 million and a fair value of $1.0$1.1 million. We place loans on non-
F-18


accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Borrower Loans in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Loans Held for Sale
At December 31, 2019, outstanding Loans Held for Sale had original maturities between 36 months and 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and had various maturity dates through December 2024. Fair value adjustments recorded in earnings on loans invested in by Prosper during 2019 was a net loss of $1.2 million. Interest income earned on Loans Held for Sale by the Company during 2019 was $19.0 million.
As of December 31, 2019, Loans Held for Sale that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amount of $0.7 million and a fair value of $0.2 million. PMI places loans on non-accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Borrower2019, Loans Held for Sale in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.3$0.1 million.
At December 31, 2018, outstanding Loans Held for Sale had original maturities between 36 months and 60 months had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and had various maturity dates through December 2023. Fair value adjustments recorded in earnings on loans invested in by Prosper during 2018 was a net loss of $1.9 million. Interest income earned on Loans Held for Sale by the Company during 2018 was $14.1 million.
As of December 31, 2018, Loans Held for Sale that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amount of $0.8 million and $0.5a fair value of $0.3 million respectively.. PMI places loans on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due.

5. Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper accounts for servicing assetsServicing Assets and liabilitiesLiabilities at their estimated fair values with changes in fair values recorded in servicing fees.Servicing Fees. The initial asset or liability is recognized when Prosper sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers through the Whole Loan Channel and the servicing rights are retained. The servicing assetsServicing Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value throughout the servicing period. The total gains and losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans for the year ended December 31, 20172019 were a gain of $11.4$10.9 million recognized in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans and a loss of $60.1$17.6 million from the Fair recognized in “Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans toLoans” on the Consortium. Prosper initially records servicing assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values when Prosper sells Borrower Loans in their entirety to unrelated third-party buyers.Consolidated Statement of Operations. The total gains and losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans were $3.6 million and $14.2 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162018 were a gain of $13.1 million recognized in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans and 2015 respectively.
Ata loss of $72.3 million recognized in “Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The total gains and losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans for the year ended December 31, 2017 were a gain of $11.4 million recognized in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans and a loss of $60.1 million recognized in Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
As of December 31, 2019, Borrower Loans that were sold, to unrelated third parties, but for which weProsper retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.7$3.1 billion, original terms of either 36 months or 60 months, and had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 35.52%31.92%, and various maturity dates through December 2022.2024. At December 31, 2016,2018, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which weProsper retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.5$3.6 billion, original terms betweenof either 36 andmonths or 60 months, and had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.32%5.31% to 35.52%, and various maturity dates through December 2021.2023.
$39.038.4 million, $38.9$43.1 million and $22.1$39.0 million of contractually specified servicing fees, late chargesServicing Fees and ancillary fees are included on our Statementthe Consolidated Statements of Operations in Servicing“Servicing Fees, NetNet” for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.  
Fair valueValue Valuation Method
Valuation method – Prosper uses a discounted cash flow valuation methodology generally consisting of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discountingdiscounts those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the table within Note 78 below are those that Prosper considers significant to the estimated fair values of the servicing assetsLevel 3 Servicing Assets and liabilities. The following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.   
Market servicing rate – ProsperServicing Rate
Management estimates adequate market servicing rates that would fairly compensate a substitute servicer should one be required, which includes the profit that would be demanded in the marketplace. This rate is stated as a fixed percentage of outstanding principal balance on a per annum basis. Prosper estimated theseManagement estimates market servicing rates based on observable market rates for other loan types in the industry and on observing bids from subservicingsub-servicing providers, adjusted for the unique loan
F-19


attributes that are present in the specific loans that Prosper sells and services, and from information from a backup service provider.providers.
Discount rate – Rate
The discount rate is a rate of return used to discount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, which represents the fair value of the loan servicing rights. We usedManagement uses a range of discount rates for the servicing assetsServicing Assets and liabilitiesLiabilities based on comparable observed valuations of similar assets and publicly available disclosures related to servicing valuations, with comparability adjustments made to account for differences with Prosper’s servicing assets.Servicing Assets.
Default Rate
The default rate presented in Note 78 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e. Prosperrisk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional default rate curves for each credit grade or Borrower Loan category. Each point on a particular Borrower Loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to default per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. The assumption regarding defaults directly reduces servicing revenues because the amount of servicing revenues received is based on the amount collected each period.


Prepayment Rate
The prepayment rate presented in Note 78 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e. Prosperrisk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional prepayment rate curves for each credit grade or Borrower Loan category. Each point on a particular Borrower Loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to prepay per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. Prepayments reduce servicing revenues as they shorten the period over which we expectPFL expects to collect fees on the Borrower Loans, which is used to project future servicing revenues.

6. Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value
Available for sale investments are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are reported, net of taxes, in Accumulated"Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss " included in Stockholders' Deficitstockholders' equity unless management determines that an investment is OTTI.other-than-temporarily impaired.
Prosper did not hold Available for Sale Investments as of the year ended December 31, 2019, nor did Prosper sell any Available for Sale Investments during the year ended December 31, 2019.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of availableAvailable for sale investments as ofSale Investments for the year ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,2018 are as follows (in thousands):
Amortized CostGross Unrealized GainsGross Unrealized LossesFair Value
December 31, 2018
Fixed maturity securities:    
Treasury Bills$17,940  $—  $(3) $17,937  
US Treasury securities$4,246  $—  $(10) $4,236  
$22,186  $—  $(13) $22,173  


7. Securitizations
During 2019, Prosper co-sponsored securitizations of unsecured personal whole loans facilitated through our marketplace with outstanding principal balance of $573.0 million through three securitization trusts (PMIT 2019-1, PMIT 2019-2, and PMIT 2019-4). Each securitization trust issued senior notes, a risk retention interest and residual certificates to finance the purchase of Borrower Loans. The risk retention interest represents the right to receive 5.0% of all amounts collected on the Borrower Loans held by the securitization trusts. The resulting senior notes were sold to third party investors. Prosper retained 65.5%, 16.4%, and 19.6% of the residual certificates issued by PMIT 2019-1, PMIT 2019-2, and PMIT 2019-4, respectively. The remaining residual certificates and all the risk retention interests are held by third-party investors. In addition to the retained residual certificates, Prosper's continued involvement includes loan servicing responsibilities over the life of the underlying loans.
F-20


December 31, 2017Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
Fixed maturity securities: 
  
  
  
Treasury Bills$34,014
 $
 $(36) $33,978
US Treasury securities19,207
 
 (38) 19,169
Total Available for Sale Investments$53,221
 $
 $(74) $53,147
PMIT 2019-1, 2019-2 and 2019-4 are deemed VIEs. Prosper consolidated the VIEs as the primary beneficiary because Prosper, through its role as the servicer, has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the VIEs' economic performance and a variable interest that could potentially be significant to the VIEs through holding the retained residual certificates. In evaluating whether Prosper is the primary beneficiary, management considers both qualitative and quantitative factors regarding the nature, size and form of our involvement with the VIEs. Management assesses whether Prosper is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs on an on-going basis. For these VIEs, the creditors have no recourse to the general credit of Prosper and the liabilities of the VIEs can only be settled by the respective VIEs' assets. Additionally, the assets of the VIEs can be used only to settle obligations of the VIEs. Because Prosper consolidates the securitization trusts, the loans held in the securitization trusts are included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value”, the notes sold to third party investors recorded in “Notes Issued by Securitization Trust”, and the risk retention interests and residual certificates held by third party investors in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
PMIT 2019-1
December 31, 2016Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
Fixed maturity securities: 
  
  
  
Corporate debt securities$21,762
 $1
 $(10) $21,753
US Treasury securities$8,516
 $3
 $(3) $8,516
Agency bonds2,499
 1
 
 2,500
Total Available for Sale Investments$32,777
 $5
 $(13) $32,769
A summary of available for sale investments with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2017, aggregated by category and period of continuous unrealized loss, is as follows (in thousands):
 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total
 Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
Fixed maturity securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
Treasury Bills$33,978
 $(36) $
 $
 $33,978
 $(36)
US Treasury securities19,169
 (38) 
 
 19,169
 (38)
Total Investments with Unrealized Losses$53,147
 $(74) $
 $
 $53,147
 $(74)
The maturities of available for sale investments at December 31, 2017, are as follows (in thousands):


  Within 1 year After 1 year through 5 years After 5 years to 10 years After 10 years Total
Treasury Bills 33,978
 
 
 
 33,978
US Treasury securities 14,947
 4,222
 
 
 19,169
Total Fair Value $48,925
 $4,222
 $
 $
 $53,147
Total Amortized Cost $48,992
 $4,229
 $
 $
 $53,221
Prosper sold investmentsnotes under the PMIT 2019-1 securitization were issued in available for sale securitiesthree classes: Class A in the amount of $31.2$127.3 million, duringClass B in the year ended amount of $25.0 million, and Class C in the amount of $19.3 million (collectively, the “2019-1 Notes”). The Class A, Class B and Class C notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.54%, 4.03% and 5.27%, respectively. Principal and interest payments began in March 2019 and are payable monthly. These notes are recorded at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The associated debt issuance costs of $2.3 million are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the contractual life of the notes. The notes held by third-party investors and the unamortized debt issuance costs are included in Notes Issued by Securitization Trust with a balance of $94.2 million and are secured by Borrower Loans with a fair value of $104.2 million as of December 31, 2017 which resulted2019. The risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors at fair value of $9.8 million are included in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.
PMIT 2019-2
The notes under the PMIT 2019-2 securitization were issued in three classes: Class A in the amount of $110.1 million, Class B in the amount of $31.4 million and Class C in the amount of $32.7 million (collectively, the “2019-2 Notes”). The Class A, Class B and Class C notes bear interest at a lossfixed rate of $9 thousand.3.20%, 3.69% and 5.05%, respectively. Principal and interest payments began in July 2019 and are payable monthly. These notes are recorded at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The associated debt issuance costs of $1.9 million are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the contractual life of the notes. The notes held by third-party investors and the unamortized debt issuance costs are included in Notes Issued by Securitization Trust with a balance of $122.0 million and are secured by Borrower Loans with a fair value of $138.5 million as of December 31, 2019. The risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors at fair value of $21.5 million are included in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.
PMIT 2019-4
7.The notes under the PMIT 2019-4 securitization were issued in three classes: Class A in the amount of $102.6 million, Class B in the amount of $19.5 million and Class C in the amount of $16.8 million (collectively, the “2019-4 Notes”). The Class A, Class B and Class C notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.48%, 3.20% and 4.95% respectively. Principal and interest payments began in December 2019 and are payable monthly. These notes are recorded at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The associated debt issuance costs of $1.2 million are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the contractual life of the notes. The notes held by third-party investors and the unamortized debt issuance costs are included in Notes Issued by Securitization Trust with a balance of $131.4 million and are secured by Borrower Loans with a fair value of $146.1 million as of December 31, 2019. The risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors at fair value of $20.8 million are included in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.

8. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
For a description of the fair value hierarchy and Prosper’s fair value methodologies, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Prosper did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of levelLevel 3 during the year ended December 31, 2017.2019 or 2018.
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, servicing rights and Notesloan trailing fee liability are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of
F-21


valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used in the discounted cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Salemodel include default and Notes include defaultprepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade.
Investments held at fair value consist of availableAvailable for sale investments.  The available for sale investments consist of corporate debt securities, U.S. treasury securities, treasury bills and agency bonds.Sale Investments. When available, Prospermanagement uses quoted prices in active markets to measure the fair value of availableAvailable for sale securities.Sale Investments. When utilizing market data and bid-ask spreads, Prosper uses the price within the bid-ask spread that best represents fair value. When quoted prices do not exist, Prosper uses prices obtained from independent third-party pricing services to measure the fair value of investment assets. Prosper generally obtains prices from at least two independent pricing sources for assets recorded at fair value. Prosper's primary independent pricing service provides prices based on observable trades and discounted cash flows that incorporate observable information, such as yields for similar types of securities (a benchmark interest rate plus observable spreads) and weighted-average maturity for the same or similar securities. ProsperThe Company compares the prices obtained from its primary independent pricing service to the prices obtained from the additional independent pricing services to determine if the price obtained from the primary independent pricing service is reasonable. ProsperThe Company does not adjust the prices received from independent third-party pricing services unless such prices are inconsistent with the definition of fair value and result in a material difference in the recorded amounts.
The Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability is valued using a Black Scholes-OptionBlack-Scholes option pricing model. Refer to Note 13 for further details.additional information.
The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands):

December 31, 2019Level 1 InputsLevel 2 InputsLevel 3 InputsTotal
Assets:    
Borrower Loans$—  $—  $634,019  $634,019  
Loans Held for Sale—  —  142,026  142,026  
Available for Sale Investments—  —  —  —  
Servicing Assets—  —  12,602  12,602  
—  —  788,647  788,647  
Liabilities:
Notes$—  $—  $244,171  $244,171  
Servicing Liabilities—  —  —  —  
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust—  —  52,168  52,168  
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability—  —  149,996  149,996  
Loan Trailing Fee Liability—  —  2,997  2,997  
$—  $—  $449,332  $449,332  


December 31, 2018Level 1 InputsLevel 2 InputsLevel 3 InputsTotal
Assets:    
Borrower Loans$—  $—  $263,522  $263,522  
Loans Held for Sale—  —  183,788  183,788  
Available for Sale Investments—  22,173  —  22,173  
Servicing Assets—  —  14,687  14,687  
—  22,173  461,997  484,170  
Liabilities:    
Notes$—  $—  $264,003  $264,003  
Servicing Liabilities—  —  12  12  
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability—  —  143,679  143,679  
Loan Trailing Fee Liability—  —  3,118  3,118  
$—  $—  $410,812  $410,812  
December 31, 2017Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total
Assets: 
  
  
  
Borrower Loans$
 $
 $293,005
 $293,005
Loans Held for Sale
 
 49
 49
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value
 53,147
 
 53,147
Servicing Assets
 
 14,711
 14,711
Total Assets
 53,147
 307,765
 360,912
Liabilities: 
  
  
  
Notes$
 $
 $293,948
 $293,948
Servicing Liabilities
 
 59
 59
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability
 
 116,366
 116,366
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
 
 2,595
 2,595
Total Liabilities$
 $
 $412,968
 $412,968
December 31, 2016Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total
Assets: 
  
  
  
Borrower Loans$
 $
 $315,627
 $315,627
Loans Held for Sale
 
 624
 624
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value
 32,769
 
 32,769
Servicing Assets
 
 12,786
 12,786
Total Assets
 32,769
 329,037
 361,806
Liabilities: 
  
  
  
Notes$
 $
 $316,236
 $316,236
Servicing Liabilities$
 $
 $198
 $198
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability$
 $
 $21,711
 $21,711
Loan Trailing Fee Liability$
 $
 $665
 $665
Total Liabilities

$
 $
 $338,810
 $338,810

As Prosper’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Servicing Assets, Servicing LiabilitiesCertificates Issued by Securitization Trust, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, and Loan Trailing Fee Liabilityloan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosperthe Company uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the levelLevel 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external
F-22


sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the levelLevel 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.

Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following tables present quantitative information about the range of significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper’s levelthe Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2017:2019:
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes:
 December 31,
20192018
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Notes
Discount rate4.4 %—  12.2 % 4.7 %—  13.8 %
Default rate2.1 %—  18.6 % 2.0 %—  15.8 %

Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2017December 31, 2016
Discount rate4.0% - 14.4%4.0% - 15.9%
Default rate2.0% - 15.4%1.7% - 14.9%
December 31,

2019
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust
Discount rate4.0 %—  15.0 %
Default rate2.0 %—  17.0 %
Prepayment rate14.5 %—  33.0 %



December 31,
20192018
Servicing Rights
Discount rate15.0 %—  25.0 %15.0 %—  25.0 %
Default rate1.7 %—  18.8 %1.6 %—  16.7 %
Prepayment rate16.5 %—  28.1 %15.5 %—  25.1 %
Market servicing rate (1)
0.625 %0.625 %
(1) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 6 basis points and 8 basis points, respectively, for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 68.5 basis points and 70.5 basis points respectively.
Servicing Assets and Liabilities:
 December 31,

20192018
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
Discount rate15.0 %—  25.0 %15.0 %—  25.0 %
Default rate1.7 %—  18.8 %1.6 %—  16.7 %
Prepayment rate16.5 %—  28.1 %15.5 %—  25.1 %
  Range
Unobservable Input December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Discount rate 15% - 25%
 15% - 25%
Default rate 1.5% - 16.1%
 1.5% - 15.2%
Prepayment rate 13.5% - 30.2%
 13.6% - 26.6%
Market servicing rate (1)
 0.625% 0.625%
(1) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 7 basis points and 7 basis points for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 69.5 basis points and 69.5 basis points respectively.
Loan Trailing Fee Liability:
Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2017December 31, 2016
Discount rate15% - 25%15% - 25%
Default rate1.5% - 16.1%1.5% - 15.2%
Prepayment rate13.5% - 30.2%13.6% - 26.6%

At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. As demonstrated
F-23


Changes in the following table, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the NotesLevel 3 Fair Value Assets and because the principal balances of the Borrower Loans approximated the principal balances of the Notes.Liabilities on a Recurring Basis
The following tables presenttable presents additional information about levelLevel 3 Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans, and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 
AssetsLiabilities
 
Loans Held
for Sale
Borrower
Loans
NotesTotal
Fair Value at January 1, 2018$49  $293,005  $(293,948) $(894) 
     Additions - Purchases, Issuances2,365,431  177,101  (176,830) 2,365,702  
     Principal repayments(43,169) (171,427) 175,760  (38,836) 
     Borrower Loans sold to third parties(2,135,329) (3,690) —  (2,139,019) 
     Other changes1,422  (202) 441  1,661  
    Change in fair value(4,616) (31,265) 30,574  (5,307) 
Fair Value at December 31, 2018183,788  263,522  (264,003) 183,307  
     Additions - Purchases, Issuances2,320,560  561,711  (171,138) 2,711,133  
     Transfers in (Transfers out)(178,924) 178,924  —  —  
     Principal repayments(68,857) (313,909) 167,419  (215,347) 
     Borrower Loans sold to third parties(2,108,231) (5,417) —  (2,113,648) 
     Other changes584  33  739  1,356  
     Change in fair value(6,894) (50,845) 22,812  (34,927) 
Fair Value at December 31, 2019$142,026  $634,019  $(244,171) $531,874  
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Borrower
Loans
 Notes 
Loans Held
for Sale
 Total
Balance at January 1, 2017$315,627
 $(316,236) $624
 $15
Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes194,887
 (194,391) 2,619,130
 $2,619,626
Principal repayments(188,199) 191,828
 (89) $3,540
Borrower Loans sold to third parties(3,855) 
 (2,619,620) $(2,623,475)
Other changes97
 (180) (3) $(86)
Change in fair value(25,552) 25,031
 7
 $(514)
Balance at December 31, 2017$293,005
 $(293,948) $49
 $(894)


Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Borrower
Loans
 Notes 
Loans Held
for Sale
 Total
Balance at January 1, 2016$297,273
 $(297,405) $32
 $(100)
Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes217,582
 (217,767) 1,979,952
 1,979,767
Principal repayments(171,195) 173,958
 (447) 2,316
Borrower Loans sold to third parties(2,515) 
 (1,978,905) (1,981,420)
Other changes416
 (591) (1) (176)
Change in fair value(25,934) 25,569
 (7) (372)
Balance at December 31, 2016$315,627
 $(316,236) $624
 $15

The following table presents additional information about the levelLevel 3 servicing assets and liabilitiesServicing Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
Servicing Assets 
Fair Value at January 1, 2018$14,711 
     Additions13,171 
     Loss in fair value(13,195)
Fair Value at December 31, 2018$14,687 
     Additions11,925 
     Derecognition(1,522)
     Loss in fair value(12,488)
Fair Value at Fair Value at December 31, 2019$12,602 
 
Servicing
Assets
 
Servicing
Liabilities
Fair Value at January 1, 2016$14,363
 $484
Additions9,833
 9
Less: Changes in fair value(11,410) (295)
Fair Value at December 31, 201612,786
 198
Additions14,138
 
Less: Changes in fair value(12,213) (139)
Fair Value at December 31, 2017$14,711
 $59

The following table presentstables present additional information about levelLevel 3 Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust
Fair Value at December 31, 2018— 
     Additions - Purchases, Issuances72,917 
     Principal repayments(13,770)
     Borrower Loans sold to third parties— 
     Other changes642 
     Change in fair value(7,621)
Fair Value at December 31, 2019$52,168 

F-24


The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability 
Fair Value at January 1, 2018$116,366 
     Issuance of Stock Warrants72,316 
Change in fair value(45,003)
Fair Value at December 31, 2018$143,679 
     Issuance of Stock Warrants17,552 
Change in fair value(11,235)
Fair Value at December 31, 2019$149,996 
Balance as of January 1, 2016$
Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant21,704
Change in fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability$7
Balance at December 31, 2016$21,711
Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant65,516
Change in fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability29,139
Balance at December 31, 2017$116,366
Loan Trailing Fee
The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and default rates using a discounted cash flow model.

The following table presents additional information about level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
Loan Trailing Fee Liability 
Balance as of January 1, 2018$2,595 
Issuances2,524 
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(2,494)
Change in fair value493 
Balance at December 31, 2018$3,118 
Issuances2,254 
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(2,660)
Change in fair value285 
Balance at December 31, 2019$2,997 

F-25

Balance as of January 1, 2016$
Issuances647
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(21)
Change in fair value39
Balance at December 31, 2016$665
Issuances2,631
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(956)
Change in fair value255
Balance at December 31, 2017$2,595



Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Assumptions and Input Sensitivity
Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust that are presented in the table below. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 20172019 for Borrower Loans combined with Loans Held for Sale and for Notes originatedfunded through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):
 Borrower Loans and
Loans Held for Sale
 Notes
Fair value at December 31, 2019, using the following assumptions:$776,045  $244,171  
     Weighted-average discount rate7.00 %6.43 %
     Weighted-average default rate12.63 %13.68 %
Fair value resulting from:   
100 basis point increase in discount rate$768,924   $241,927  
200 basis point increase in discount rate$761,971   $239,737  
Fair value resulting from:   
100 basis point decrease in discount rate$783,344   $246,471  
200 basis point decrease in discount rate$790,823   $248,828  
Fair value resulting from:   
100 basis point increase in default rate$765,894   $240,958  
200 basis point increase in default rate$756,007   $237,831  
Fair value resulting from:   
100 basis point decrease in default rate$786,541   $247,489  
200 basis point decrease in default rate$797,065   $250,817  

F-26

 Borrower Loans / Loans Held for Sale Notes 
Fair value at December 31, 2017$293,054
 $293,948
 
Discount rate assumption:7.15%*7.15%*
Resulting fair value from: 
  
 
100 basis point increase$290,116
 $290,948
 
200 basis point increase287,206
 288,024
 
Resulting fair value from: 
  
 
100 basis point decrease$296,169
 $297,028
 
200 basis point decrease299,319
 300,192
 
     
Default rate assumption:13.52%*13.52%*
Resulting fair value from: 
  
 
100 basis point increase$289,386
 $290,202
 
200 basis point increase285,792
 286,581
 
Resulting fair value from: 
  
 
100 basis point decrease$296,868
 $297,742
 
200 basis point decrease300,679
 301,584
 

* Represents weighted average assumptions considering all credit grades.
The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2019 for Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust is presented in the following table presents(in thousands, except percentages):
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust
Fair value at December 31, 2019, using the following assumptions:$52,168 
Weighted-average discount rate9.59 %
Weighted-average default rate10.12 %
Weighted-average prepayment rate21.41 %
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in discount rate$51,813 
200 basis point increase in discount rate$51,466 
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in discount rate$52,533 
200 basis point decrease in discount rate$52,909 
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in default rate$48,986 
200 basis point increase in default rate$45,926 
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in default rate$55,369 
200 basis point decrease in default rate$58,613 
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in prepayment rate$52,085 
200 basis point increase in prepayment rate52,008 
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in prepayment rate$52,253 
200 basis point decrease in prepayment rate$52,340 

F-27


Key economic assumptions are used to compute the estimated impact on Prosper’s estimated fair value of servicing assetsServicing Assets and liabilities, calculated using different market servicing rates and different default rates asare presented in the table below. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 20172019 for Servicing Assets is presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages).:
 
Servicing
Assets
 
Servicing
Liabilities
Fair value at December 31, 2017$14,711
 $59
Market servicing rate assumptions0.625% 0.625%
Resulting fair value from: 
  
Market servicing rate increase to 0.65%$13,816
 $65
Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60%$15,690
 $53
    
Weighted average prepayment assumptions19.80% 19.80%
Resulting fair value from: 
  
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate$14,509
 $59
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate$14,882
 $60
    
Weighted average default assumptions13.00% 13.00%
Resulting fair value from: 
  
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate$14,556
 $59
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate$14,954
 $59


Servicing
Assets
Fair value at December 31, 2019, using the following assumptions:$12,602 
     Market servicing rate0.625 %
     Weighted-average prepayment rate20.99 %
     Weighted-average default rate12.67 %
Fair value resulting from:
Market servicing rate increase to 0.65%$11,825 
Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60%$13,387 
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate$12,348 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate$12,868 
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate$12,377 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate$12,840 
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects.
Assets and Liabilities Not Recorded at Fair Value
8.The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value (in thousands):
December 31, 2019Carrying AmountLevel 1 InputsLevel 2 InputsLevel 3 InputsFair Value
Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents$64,635  $64,635  $—  $—  $64,635  
Restricted Cash155,773  —  155,773  —  155,773  
Accounts Receivable1,695  —  1,695  —  1,695  
222,103  64,635  157,468  —  222,103  
Liabilities
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$19,937  —  19,937  —  $19,937  
Payable to Investors101,092  —  101,092  —  101,092  
Notes Issued by Securitization Trust347,662  —  353,028  —  353,028  
Warehouse Lines131,583  —  131,090  —  131,090  
$600,274  $—  $605,147  $—  $605,147  

F-28


December 31, 2018Carrying AmountLevel 1 InputsLevel 2 InputsLevel 3 InputsFair Value
Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents$57,945  57,945  —  —  $57,945  
Restricted Cash149,114  —  149,114  —  149,114  
Accounts Receivable5,119  —  5,119  —  5,119  
212,178  57,945  154,233  —  212,178  
Liabilities
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$19,967  —  19,967  —  $19,967  
Payable to Investors127,538  —  127,538  —  127,538  
Warehouse Lines162,488  —  162,488  —  162,488  
$309,993  —  309,993  —  $309,993  

The estimated fair values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities and Payable to Investors approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.

9. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net
Goodwill
The following table presents the goodwill activity for the periods presented (in thousands):
Goodwill - January 1, 2016$36,368
2016 acquisitions$
Goodwill - December 31, 2016$36,368
2017 acquisitions
Goodwill - December 31, 2017$36,368
 WeProsper’s Goodwill balance of $36.4 million at December 31, 2019 did not record any goodwillchange during the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company recorded 0 Goodwill impairment expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.   2017.
Other Intangible Assets, Net
The following table presents the detail of other intangible assetsIntangible Assets subject to amortization for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

Gross
Carrying Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying Value
Remaining
Useful Life
(In Years)
December 31, 2017
Gross
Carrying Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying Value
 
Remaining
Useful Life
(In Years)
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019
Developed technology$3,060
 $(3,038) $22
 0.3Developed technology$3,060  $(3,060) $—  $—  
User base and customer relationships5,050
 (3,695) 1,355
 7.3User base and customer relationships5,050  (4,330) 720  5.3
Brand name60
 (60) 
 0.0Brand name60  (60) —  —  
Total intangible assets subject to amortization$8,170
 $(6,793) $1,377
  
$8,170  $(7,450) $720  

Gross
Carrying Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying Value
Remaining
Useful Life
(In Years)
December 31, 2016
Gross
Carrying Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying Value
 
Remaining
Useful Life
(In Years)
December 31, 2018December 31, 2018
Developed technology$8,310
 $(2,393) $5,917
 3.8Developed technology$3,060  $(3,060) $—  —  
User base and customer relationships6,250
 (2,955) 3,295
 8.3User base and customer relationships5,050  (4,051) 999  6.3
Brand name60
 (60) 
 0.0Brand name60  (60) —  —  
Total intangible assets subject to amortization$14,620
 $(5,408) $9,212
  
$8,170  $(7,171) $999     
We did not record any intangible additions
The Company recorded 0 additional intangibles for the year ended December 31, 20172019 or 2016.2018.
The user base and customer relationship intangible assetsIntangible Assets are being amortized on an accelerated basis over a three to ten year period. The technology and brand name intangible assetsIntangible Assets are being amortized on a straight line basis over three to five years and one year, respectively. DuringFor the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded 0 intangible asset impairment. For the year ended December 31, 2017, certain intangible assetsIntangible Assets were made available for sale and as a result they were written down to fair value. This resulted in a $6.4$6.4 million impairment loss, which is recorded in Other Expenses“Other Expense (Income), Net” on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations.

F-29



Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 was $1.4$0.3 million, $3.8$0.4 million and $1.6$1.4 million, respectively. Estimated amortization of purchased intangible assetsIntangible Assets for future periods is as follows (in thousands):

Years Ending December 31,
2020$220  
2021172  
2022136  
2023107  
202485  
$720  

Year Ending December 31, 
2018379
2019279
2020219
2021172
2022136
Thereafter192
Total$1,377
9.10. Other Liabilities
Other Liabilities includesconsist of the following (in thousands):
 December 31,
 20192018
Loan trailing fee liability$2,997  $3,118  
Deferred revenue241  396  
Loan servicing liabilities—  12  
Deferred income tax liability405  373  
Deferred rent—  3,408  
Operating lease liabilities17,507  —  
Restructuring liability—  2,106  
Other576  1,216  
Total Other Liabilities$21,726  $10,629  

11. Debt
Prosper Warehouse Trust Agreements
Prosper’s consolidated VIEs, PWIT and PWIIT (together, “Warehouse VIEs”), each entered into an agreement (together, “Warehouse Agreements”) with certain lenders for committed revolving lines of credit (“Warehouse Lines”) during 2019 and 2018. In connection with the Warehouse Agreements, the Warehouse VIEs each entered into a security agreement with a bank as administrative agent and a national banking association as collateral trustee and paying agent. Proceeds under the Warehouse Lines may only be used to purchase certain unsecured consumer loans and related rights and documents from Prosper and to pay fees and expenses related to the Warehouse Lines. Both Warehouse VIEs are consolidated because Prosper is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs. The creditors of the Warehouse Lines have no recourse to the general credit of Prosper. Additionally, the assets of the VIEs can be used only to settle obligations of the VIEs. The loans held in the Warehouse VIEs are included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” and Warehouse Lines are in “Warehouse Lines” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Both Warehouse Agreements contain the same certain covenants including restrictions on each Warehouse VIE's ability to incur indebtedness, pledge assets, merge or consolidate and enter into certain affiliate transactions. Each Warehouse Agreement also requires Prosper to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $25 million, minimum net liquidity of $15 million and a maximum leverage ratio of 5:1. Tangible net worth is defined as the sum of (i) (A) Convertible Preferred Stock, (B) total Stockholders’ Deficit and (C) Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, less the sum of (ii) (A) goodwill and (B) intangible assets. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of cash, cash equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. The leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of total consolidated indebtedness other than non-recourse securitization indebtedness, non-recourse or limited recourse warehouse indebtedness and borrower dependent notes, to tangible net worth. As of December 31, 2019, Prosper was in compliance with the covenants under each Warehouse Agreement.
PWIT Warehouse Line
On January 19, 2018, through PWIT, Prosper entered into a Warehouse Agreement for a Warehouse Line. Effective June 12, 2018, the Warehouse Agreement was amended. The amendments included increasing the committed line of credit from $100 million to $200 million, extending the term of the PWIT Warehouse Line (including the final maturity date), amending the monthly unused commitment fee and reducing the rate at which the PWIT Warehouse Line bears interest.
F-30


 Year Ending December 31,
 2017 2016
Class action settlement liability$
 $2,996
Loan trailing fee2,595
 665
Deferred revenue452
 226
Servicing liabilities59
 198
Deferred income tax liability225
 766
Deferred rent3,904
 4,469
Restructuring liability3,355
 6,052
Other2,079
 1,801
Total Other Liabilities$12,669
 $17,173
Subsequently the Warehouse Agreement was amended on June 20, 2019 to extend the facility, to reduce the interest rate and unused commitment fee and to expand the eligibility criteria for unsecured consumer loans that can be financed through the PWIT Warehouse Line.
Under the amended agreement, proceeds of loans made under the PWIT Warehouse Line may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until the earlier of June 20, 2021 and at the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default. Repayment of any outstanding proceeds will be made over the 24 month period ending June 20, 2023, excluding the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default.
10.Under the amended agreement, the PWIT Warehouse Line bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.9% and has an advance rate of 89%. Additionally, the PWIT Warehouse Line bears a monthly unused commitment fee, depending on utilization, of 0.50% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the PWIT Warehouse Line.
As of December 31, 2019, Prosper had $81.4 million in debt and accrued interest outstanding under the PWIT Warehouse Line. This debt is secured by an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $85.7 million included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2019 the undrawn portion available under the Warehouse Line was $119.0 million. Prosper incurred $1.8 million of deferred debt issuance costs, which are included in “Prepaids and Other Assets” and amortized to interest expense over the term of the revolving arrangement.
Prosper purchased a swaption to limit the Company's exposure to increases in LIBOR. The swaptions are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value in Prepaids and Other Assets. Any changes in the fair value are recorded in the Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The fair value of the swaption was not material at December 31, 2019.
PWIIT Warehouse Line
On March 28, 2019, through PWIIT, Prosper entered into a second Warehouse Agreement for a $300 million Warehouse Line with a national banking association different than that of PWIT. Under the PWIIT Warehouse Agreement, proceeds of loans made under the PWIIT Warehouse Line may be borrowed, repaid, and reborrowed until the earlier of March 28, 2021 and at the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default. Repayment of any outstanding proceeds will be made over the 24 month period ending March 28, 2023, excluding the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default.
Under the agreement, the PWIIT Warehouse Line bears interest at a rate of LIBOR, or the lender's asset-backed commercial paper rate, plus a spread of 2.9%. The spread increases by 0.375% during the first twelve months immediately following the termination of the revolving period with an additional increase of 0.375% one year later. The PWIIT Warehouse Line has an advance rate of 90%. Additionally, the PWIIT Warehouse Line bears a monthly unused commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the PWIIT Warehouse Line.
As of December 31, 2019, Prosper had $50.2 million in debt and accrued interest outstanding under the PWIIT Warehouse Line. This debt is secured by an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $56.5 million included in Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2019 the undrawn portion available under the PWIIT Warehouse Line was $250.0 million. Prosper incurred $2.1 million of deferred debt issuance costs, which are included in “Prepaids and Other Assets” and amortized to interest expense over the term of the revolving arrangement.

12. Net Loss Per Share
Prosper computes net lossincome (loss) per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC Topic 260”). Under ASC Topic 260, basic net loss per shareNet Loss Per Share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and excludes the effects of any potentially dilutive securities.
We compute EarningsProper computes its earnings (loss) per Shareshare (“EPS”) using the two-class method.method in ASC Topic 260. The two-class method allocates earnings that otherwise would have been available to common shareholders to holders of participating securities. We considerManagement considers all series of our convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock to be participating securities due to their rights to participate in dividends with common stock.Common Stock. As such, earnings allocated to these participating securities, which include participation rights in undistributed earnings, are subtracted from net income to determine total undistributed earnings to be allocated to common stockholders.
All participating securities are excluded from basic weighted-average common shares outstanding. Prior to any conversion to common shares, each series of PMI’s convertible preferred stockProsper’s Convertible Preferred Stock was entitled to participate on an if convertedif-converted basis in distributions of earnings, when and if declared by the board of directors, that were made to common stockholders and as a resultconsequently, these shares were considered participating securities. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, certain shares issued as a result of the early exercise of stock options which are subject to a repurchase
F-31


right by PMI were entitled to receive non-forfeitable dividends during the vesting period and as a result wereconsequently, are considered participating securities.
The weighted average shares used in calculating basic and diluted net loss per shareNet Loss Per Share excludes certain shares that are disclosed as outstanding shares in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Deficit because such shares are restricted as they were associated with options that were early exercised and continue to remain unvested.


Basic and diluted net loss per shareNet Loss Per Share was calculated as follows (net loss in thousands)(in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
 December 31,
 201920182017
Numerator:  
Net Loss$(13,711) $(39,945) $(115,158) 
Plus: Return from shareholders on share repurchase1,066  —  —  
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$(12,645) $(39,945) $(115,158) 
Denominator:
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted Net Loss Per Share70,511,605  70,384,501  69,687,836  
Net Loss Per Share - basic and diluted$(0.18)$(0.57)$(1.65)
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Numerator: 
  
  
Net loss available to common stockholders for basic and diluted EPS$(115,158) $(118,741) $(25,968)
Denominator: 
  
  
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and
   diluted net loss per share
69,687,836
 64,196,537
 55,547,408
Basic and diluted net loss per share$(1.65) $(1.85) $(0.47)

Due to losses attributable to PMI’s common shareholders for each of the periods below, theThe following potentially dilutive shares areCommon Stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share calculationNet Loss Per Share for the periods presented because they wereincluding them would have been anti-dilutive under the treasury stock or if converted method:(number of shares):
 December 31,
 201920182017
Excluded Securities  
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding209,613,570  214,637,925  214,637,925  
Stock options issued and outstanding73,851,862  69,023,373  46,722,408  
Unvested stock options exercised—  —  11,565  
Warrants issued and outstanding1,080,349  1,081,630  1,166,145  
Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock warrants35,544,141  35,544,141  35,544,141  
Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrants177,720,704  177,720,704  177,720,704  
497,810,626  498,007,773  475,802,888  

 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (shares) (shares) (shares)
Excluded securities: 
  
  
Convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding214,637,925
 177,388,425
 177,388,425
Stock options issued and outstanding46,722,408
 44,099,577
 34,358,106
Unvested stock options exercised11,565
 1,126,210
 9,806,170
Restricted Stock Units
 351,721
 190,517
Warrants issued and outstanding1,166,145
 988,513
 588,660
Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock warrants35,544,141
 1,254,111
 
Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrants177,720,704
 
 
Total common stock equivalents excluded from diluted
   net loss per common share computation
475,802,888
 225,208,557
 222,331,878
The number of shares issued and outstanding reflect a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016.
11.13. Convertible Preferred Stock, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability and Stockholders’ DeficitCommon Stock
Convertible Preferred Stock
Under PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, preferred stock is issuable in series and the Board of Directors is authorized to determine the rights, preferences, and terms of each series.
In January 2013, PMI issued and sold 69,340,760 shares of New Series A (“New Series A”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.29 per share for $19.8 million, net of issuance costs. In connection with that sale, PMI issued 25,585,910 shares at par value $0.01 per share of Series A-1 (“Series A-1”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock to the holders of shares of PMI’s convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock that was outstanding immediately prior to the sale (“Old Preferred Shares”) in consideration for such stockholders participating in the sale. In connection with the New Series A sale, Old Preferred Shares were converted into shares of common stockCommon Stock at a ratio of 1:1 if the holder of the Old Preferred Shares participated in the New Series A sale or at a 10:1 ratio if the holder of the Old Preferred Shares did not so participate. In addition, each such participating holder received a share of New Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock for every dollar of liquidation preference associated with an Old Preferred Share held by such holder. Each share of Series A-1 preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $2.00 and converts into common stockCommon Stock at a ratio of 1,000,000:1. The New Series A and Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.


In September 2013, PMI issued and sold 41,443,670 shares of New Series B (“New Series B”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.60 per share for approximately $24.9 million, net of issuance costs. The New Series B convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set
F-32


forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.
In May 2014, PMI issued and sold 24,404,770 shares of New Series C (“New Series C”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $2.87 per share for approximately $69.9 million, net of issuance costs. The Series C convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purpose of the New Series C private placement was to raise funds for general corporate needs and for the tender offer discussed below.
On June 18, 2014, PMI issued a Tender Offer Statement to purchase up to 6,963,785 shares, in the aggregate, of its New Series A convertible preferredConvertible Preferred Stock and New Series B convertible preferredConvertible Preferred Stock at a price equal to $2.87 per share. Upon closure of the tender offer on July 16, 2014, 782,540 shares of New Series A convertible preferredConvertible Preferred Stock and 5,667,790 shares of New Series B convertible preferredConvertible Preferred Stock were purchased for an aggregate price of $18.5 million.
In April 2015, PMI issued and sold 23,888,640 shares of New Series D (“New Series D”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $6.91 per share for proceeds of approximately $164.8 million, net of issuance costs. The New Series D convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purpose of the New Series D private placement was to raise funds for general corporate needs and for the share repurchase discussed below.  
In December 2016, PMI authorized 40,000,000 shares of New Series E ("New Series E") convertible preferred stock.Convertible Preferred Stock. These shares are reserved for the convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock warrants that were also issued in December 2016.2016
On December 16, 2016, PMI issued a warrant to purchase 20,267,135 shares of Series E-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock of PMI ("Series E-1") at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “First Series E-1 Warrant”) to Pinecone Investments LLC (“Pinecone”), an affiliate of Colchis Capital Management, L.P. (“Colchis”).
On February 27, 2017, PMI issued to Pinecone Investments LLC a second warrant (the “Second Series E-1 Warrant,” and together with the First Series E-1 Warrant, the “Series E-1 Warrants”) to purchase 15,277,006 shares of Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Series E-1 Warrants are immediately exercisable, in whole or in part, by paying in cash the full purchase price payable in respect of the number of shares purchased. The Series E-1 Warrants were issued pursuant to the Warrant Agreement dated December 16, 2016 between PMI and Colchis, as previously described in PMI’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the CommissionSEC on December 22, 2016.
In connection with a loan purchase agreement (“the Consortium Purchase Agreement”)Agreement (as defined in Note 17) entered into with affiliates of the Consortium ("Warrant Holders'"(as defined in Note 17, such affiliates, “Warrant Holders”) a warrant agreement was signed (the "Warrant Agreement"“Series F Warrant Agreement”). Pursuant to the Series F Warrant Agreement, PMI issued to the Consortium three3 warrants (together, the “Series F Warrant”) to purchase up to inan aggregate 177,720,706 shares of PMI’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “Warrant“Series F Warrant Shares”). Refer
The Warrant Holders' right to Note 15exercise the Series F Warrant was subject to monthly vesting during the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement based upon the volume of loans the Consortium elected to purchase (if any) in each month, subject to certain cure rights such as offering additional loans for more details.sale in subsequent periods. Under the terms of the Series F Warrant Agreement, the Series F Warrant Shares may also vest in full upon a change of control of PMI, insolvency of PMI or PFL, certain breaches of contract by PMI or PFL that are not cured within a defined cure period and upon the occurrence of certain events set forth in the Warrant Agreement.
The Series F Warrant will be exercisable with respect to vested Series F Warrant Shares, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the tenth anniversary of its date of issuance. The number of shares underlying the Series F Warrant may be adjusted following certain events such as stock splits, dividends, reclassifications and certain other issuances by PMI.
On September 20, 2017, Prosper issued and sold 37,249,497 shares of Series G convertible preferred stock ("Series G")Convertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $1.34 per share for proceeds of approximately $47.9 million, net of issuance costs. The Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purpose of the new Series G private placement was to raise funds for general corporate purposes.
On December 23, 2019, Prosper entered into a Stock Repurchase Agreement with an investor to repurchase 7,221,020 shares, in the aggregate, of Series A, Series A-1, and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock for nominal consideration. Upon execution of the Agreement, 2,130,035 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 2,245,600 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, 648,720 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and 2,196,665 shares of Common Stock were repurchased.
F-33


The number of authorized, issued and outstanding shares, their par value and liquidation preference for each series of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock as of December 31, 20172019 are disclosed in the table below (dollar amounts(amounts in thousands, except share and per share information)amounts):


Convertible Preferred Stock Par Value 
Authorized
shares
 Outstanding and Issued
shares
 
Liquidation
Preference
Series A $0.01
 68,558,220
 68,558,220
 $19,774
Series A-1 0.01
 24,760,915
 24,760,915
 49,522
Series B 0.01
 35,775,880
 35,775,880
 21,581
Series C 0.01
 24,404,770
 24,404,770
 70,075
Series D 0.01
 23,888,640
 23,888,640
 165,000
Series E-1 0.01
 35,544,141
 
 
Series E-2 0.01
 16,858,078
 
 
Series F 0.01
 177,720,707
 3
 
Series G 0.01
 37,249,497
 37,249,497
 50,000
   
 444,760,848
 214,637,925
 $375,952
The number of shares issued and outstanding reflect a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016.
Par Value
Authorized
Shares
Issued and Outstanding
Shares
Liquidation
Preference (Outstanding Shares)
Series A$0.01  68,558,220  66,428,185  $19,160  
Series A-1$0.01  24,760,915  22,515,315  45,031  
Series B$0.01  35,775,880  35,127,160  21,190  
Series C$0.01  24,404,770  24,404,770  70,075  
Series D$0.01  23,888,640  23,888,640  165,000  
Series E-1$0.01  35,544,141  —  —  
Series E-2$0.01  16,858,078  —  —  
Series F$0.01  177,720,707   —  
Series G$0.01  37,249,497  37,249,497  50,000  
    444,760,848  209,613,570  $370,456  
Dividends
Dividends on shares of the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F, and Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock are payable only when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors. NoNaN dividends will be paid with respect to the common stockCommon Stock until any declared dividends on the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2 Series F and Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock have been paid or set aside for payment to the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F and Series G convertible preferred stockholders. After payment of any such dividends, any additional dividends or distributions will be distributed among all holders of common stockCommon Stock and preferred stock in proportion to the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock that would be held by each such holder if all shares of preferred stock were converted to common stockCommon Stock at the then effective conversion rate. The Series A-1 convertible preferred shares have no dividend rights. To date, no dividends have been declared on any of the PMI’s preferred stock or common stock.Common Stock.
Conversion
Under the terms of PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the holders of preferred stock have the right to convert such preferred stock into common stockCommon Stock at any time. In addition, all preferred stock automatically converts into common stock (i)Common Stock (x) immediately prior to the closing of an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) that values Prosper at least at $2 billion and that results in aggregate proceeds to Prosper of at least $100 million or (ii)(y) upon a written request from the holders of at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding preferred stock (on an as-converted basis) includingbasis, provided that: (i) the Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock shall not be converted without at least 14% of the voting power of the outstanding Series A-1 convertible preferred stock ;Convertible Preferred Stock; (ii) the Series D shall not be converted without at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Series D; (iii) the Series E-1 and Series E-2 shall not be converted without at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Series E-1 and Series E-2, voting together as a single class; (iv) the Series F shall not be converted without at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Series F, and (v) the shares of Series G Preferred Stock will not be automatically converted unless the holders of at least 60% of the outstanding shares of Series G Preferred Stock approve such conversion.conversion). In addition, if a holder of the Series A convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock has converted any of the Series A convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, then all of such holder’s shares of Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock also will be converted upon a liquidation event. In lieu of any fractional shares of common stockCommon Stock to which a holder would otherwise be entitled, PMI shall pay such holder cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of such fractional shares, as determined by its Board of Directors. At present, each of the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, and the Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock converts into PMI common stockCommon Stock at a 1:1 ratio whileratio. Meanwhile, the Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock converts into common stockCommon Stock at a 1,000,000:1 ratio and the Series G Convertible Preferred Stock converts into Common Stock at a 1:1.36 ratio. The Series G Convertible Preferred Stock conversion ratio reflects the Series G true-up that occurred at end of the vesting period for the Series E-2 and Series F Preferred Stock warrants.
TheFor the Series G true-up, the conversion price of the Series G convertible preferred stock shall beConvertible Preferred Stock was reduced to a number equal to the Series G Preferred Stock original issuance price, divided by the quotient obtained by dividing the Series G "true up"true-up amount by the total number of Series G Preferred Stock issued as of the Series G closing date. The Series G "true up"true-up amount means the aggregate number of shares of Series G Preferred Stock that would have been issued to the purchasers of the Series G Preferred Stock on the Series G closing date, if warrants to purchase shares of Series E-2 Preferred Stock or Series F Preferred Stock that were exercisable or exercised as of the "true up"true-up time (end of vesting period) werehad been exercisable or exercised as of thesuch Series G Preferred Stock closing date.

F-34



Liquidation Rights
PMI’s convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock has been classified as temporary equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.consolidated balance sheet. The preferred stock is not redeemable;redeemable at the option of holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock; however, in the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, change in control or winding up of PMI, holders of the convertible preferred stock may have the right to receive theirits liquidation preference under the terms of PMI’s certificate of incorporation.
Each holder of Series E-1, Series E-2 and Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock is entitled to receive prior and in preference to any distribution of proceeds from a liquidation event to the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series G and Series A-1 preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock or common stock,Common Stock, an amount per share for (i) each share of Series E-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share, (ii) each share of Series E-2 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of two-thirds the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share, and (iii) each share of Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of two-thirds of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share.
After the payment or setting aside for payment to the holders of Series E-1, Series E-2, and Series F convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock each holder of Series A, Series B, Series C and Series D, Series E-2, Series F and Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock is entitled to receive, on a pari passu basis, prior to and in preference to any distribution of proceeds from a liquidation event to the holders of Series A-1 preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock or common stock,Common Stock, (i) an amount per share for each share of Series E-2 and Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of one-third of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share, and (ii) an amount per share for each share of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D and Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share.
After the payment or setting aside for payment to the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F and Series G convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, the holders of Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, prior and in preference to any distribution of proceeds to the holders of common stockCommon Stock, an amount per share for each such share of Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share.
After the payment or setting aside for payment to the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F, Series G and Series A-1 preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, the entire remaining proceeds legally available for distribution will be distributed pro ratapro-rata to the holders of Series A preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock and common stockCommon Stock in proportion to the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock held by them assuming the Series A preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock has been converted into shares of common stockCommon Stock at the then effective conversion rate, provided that the maximum aggregate amount per share of Series A convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock which the holders of Series A convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive is three times the original issue price for the Series A convertible preferred stock.Convertible Preferred Stock.
At present, the liquidation preferences are equal to $0.29 per share for the Series A convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $2.00 per share for the Series A-1 convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.60 per share for the Series B convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $2.87 per share for the Series C convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $6.91 per share for the Series D convertible preferred stock, $0.84Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.84 per share for the Series E-1 convertible preferred stock, $0.84Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.84 per share for the Series E-2 convertible preferred stock, $0.84Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.84 per share for the Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock and $1.34$1.34 per share for the Series G convertible preferred stock.Convertible Preferred Stock.
Voting
Each holder of shares of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock into which such shares of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock could be converted and each has voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the common stock.Common Stock. The holders of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock and the holders of common stockCommon Stock vote together as a single class (except with respect to certain matters that require separate votes or as required by law), and are entitled to notice of any stockholders’ meeting in accordance with the bylaws of PMI.
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability
Series E-1 Warrants


In connection with the Settlement and Release Agreement dated November 17, 2016 among PMI, PFL and Colchis, on December 16, 2016, PMI issued the First Series E-1 Warrant. TheA Second Series E-1 Warrant for an additional 15,277,006 shares of Series E-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was granted on the signing of the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 17) on February 27, 2017. The warrants expire ten years from the date of issuance. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Prosper recognized $17.8recognized $1.1 million and $9.2 million of expenseincome from the re-measurement ofchange in the fair value of the warrants.warrants for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
F-35


respectively. The income or expense resulted from changes in the fair value of the warrant is recorded through changeChange in fair valueFair Value of convertible stock warrantsConvertible Preferred Stock Warrants in the consolidated statementConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations.
To determine the fair value of the Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants, the Company first determined the value of a share of a Series E-1 convertible preferred stock.Convertible Preferred Stock. To determine the fair value of the convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company first derived the business enterprise value (“BEV”) of the Company using a variety of valuation methods, including recent transactions in the Company's stock, discounted cash flow models and market based methods, as deemed appropriate under the circumstances applicable at the valuation date. Once the Company determined an estimated BEV, the option pricing method ("OPM") was used to allocate the BEV to the various classes of the Company’sour equity, including the Company’sour preferred stock. The concluded per share value for the Series E-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was utilized as an input to the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the Series E-1 Convertible Stock Warrants.model.
The Company determined the fair value of the outstanding convertible Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrantspreferred stock warrants utilizing the following assumptions as of the following dates:December 31, 2019 and 2018:
December 31,
20192018
Volatility46.0%  40.0%  
Risk-free interest rate1.60%  2.62%  
Expected term (in years)2.753.00
Dividend yield0%  0%  
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Volatility 40.0% 40.0%
Risk-free interest rate 2.38% 2.45%
Remaining contractual term (in years) 9.04 9.96
Dividend yield 0% 0%
The above assumptions were determined as follows: 
Volatility: The volatility is derived from historical volatilities of several unrelated publicly listed peer companies over a period approximately equal to the term of the warrant becauseas the Company has limited information on the volatility of theits preferred stock since there is currently no trading history. When making the selections of industry peer companies to be used in the volatility calculation, the Company considered the size, operational, and economic similarities to the Company’s principal business operations.
Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect as of December 31, 2017,2019, and for zero coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities approximately equal to the term of the warrant. 
Remaining ContractualExpected Term: The remaining contractualexpected term representsis the period of time fromfor which the date of the valuationwarrants are expected to the expiration of the warrant. be outstanding.
Dividend Yield: The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s current expectations about the Company’s anticipated dividend policy.
Series F Warrants
In connection with the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as described in Note 15)17), PMI issued warrants to purchase up to 177,720,706 of PMI's Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock at $0.01 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Prosper recognized $11.3$10.1 million and $35.8 million of expenseincome from the re-measurement of the fair value of the warrants.warrants for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The income or expense resulting from changes in the fair value of the warrant is recorded through other expensesChange in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants in the condensed consolidated statementConsolidated Statements of operations. Operations.
To determine the fair value of the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants, the Companywe first determined the value of a share of a Series F convertible preferred stock.
Convertible Preferred Stock. To determine the fair value of the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, Warrants, the Company first derived the BEV of the Company using valuation methods, including a combination of methods, as deemed appropriate under the circumstances applicable at the valuation


date, including recent transactions of the Company's stock, discounted cash flow models and market based methods. date. Once the Company determined an estimated BEV, the OPM was used to allocate the BEV to the various classes of the Company’sProsper's equity, including the Company’sour preferred stock. The concluded per share value for the Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock warrants was utilized as an input to the the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant.model.
The Company determined the fair value of the outstanding Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrantsWarrants utilizing the following assumptions as of December 31, 2017:2019 and 2018:
December 31,
20192018
Volatility46.0%  40.0%  
Risk-free interest rate1.60%  2.63%  
Expected term (in years)2.753.00
Dividend yield0%  0%  
F-36

December 31, 2017
Volatility40.0%
Risk-free interest rate2.38%
Remaining contractual term (in years)9.16
Dividend yield0%

The above assumptions were determined as follows:
Volatility: The volatility is derived from historical volatilities of several unrelated publicly listed peer companies over a period approximately equal tousing the term ofsame criteria described above for the warrant because the Company has limited information on the volatility of the preferred stock since there is currently no trading history. When making the selections of industry peer companies to be used in the volatility calculation, the Company considered the size, operational, and economic similarities to the Company’s principal business operations.
Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect as of the period end date and for zero coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities approximately equal to the term of the warrant.
Remaining Contractual Term: The remaining contractual term represents the time from the date of the valuation to the expiration of the warrant.
Dividend Yield: The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s current expectations about the Company’s anticipated dividend policy.Series E-1 Warrants.
The combined activity of the Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is as follows (in thousands):
Balance at January 1, 2016 $
Warrants vested 21,704
Change in Fair Value 7
Balance at December 31, 2016 21,711
Warrants Vested 65,516
Change in Fair Value 29,139
Balance at December 31, 2017 $116,366
Balance at January 1, 2018116,366 
     Warrants vested72,316 
     Gain recognized(45,003)
Balance at January 1, 2019$143,679 
     Warrants Vested17,552 
     Gain recognized(11,235)
Balance at December 31, 2019$149,996 
Common Stock
PMI, through its amendedAmended and restated certificateRestated Certificate of incorporation,Incorporation, is the sole issuer of common stockCommon Stock and related options, RSUs and warrants. On February 16, 2016, PMI amended and restated its Certificate of Incorporation to, among other things, effect a 5-for-1 forward stock split. On September 20, 2017, PMI further amended its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock authorized for issuance. The total number of shares of stock which PMI has the authority to issue is 1,069,760,848,, consisting of 625,000,000 shares of common stock,Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 444,760,848 shares of preferred stock, $0.01$0.01 par value per share. As described above, the Company repurchased 2,196,665 shares of Common Stock on December 23, 2019. As of December 31, 2017, 71,226,9342019, 69,387,836 shares of common stockCommon Stock were issued and 70,290,99968,451,901 shares of common stockCommon Stock were outstanding. As of December 31, 2016, 70,843,044


2018, 71,411,145 shares of common stockCommon Stock were issued and 69,907,10970,475,210 shares of common stockCommon Stock were outstanding. Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held.  held.
During 2015, PMI repurchased 4,225,490 shares of common stock from certain employees at a price equal to $6.91 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $29.2 million. As the purchase price exceeded the fair value of common stock at the time of repurchase, Prosper recognized compensation costs of $6.2 million of which $0.33 million is recorded in Origination and Servicing, $0.07 million in Sales and Marketing and $5.7 million in General and Administrative on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As part of the transactions, PMI repurchased 3,607,095 shares for a total of $24.9 million from Prosper’s executive officers.
Common Stock Issued upon Exercise of Stock Options
During the year ended December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, PMI issued 606,284173,356 and 466,300176,011 shares of common stock,Common Stock, respectively, upon the exercise of vested options for cash proceeds of $0.1 million$26 thousand and $0.3 million,$30 thousand, respectively. Certain options are eligible for exercise prior to vesting. These unvested options may be exercised for restricted shares of common stock that have the same vesting schedule as the options. Prosper records a liability for the exercise price paid upon the exercise of unvested options, which is reclassified to common stock and additional paid-in capital as the shares vest. Should the holder’s employment be terminated, the unvested restricted shares are subject to repurchase by PMI at an amount equal to the exercise price paid for such shares. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were 11,565 and 1,126,210 shares respectively of restricted stock outstanding that remain unvested and subject to PMI’s right of repurchase.
Common Stock Issued upon Exercise of Warrants
For the year ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,2018, PMI issued 30,615 and 56,4808,200 shares of common stockCommon Stock upon the exercise of warrants, for $0.34$0.02 per share and $0.38 per share respectively.share. No such warrants were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2019.
12. Stock-based
14. Share Based Compensation
PMI grants equity awards primarily through its Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was approved as amended and restated by its stockholders on December 1, 2010; and its 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by its stockholders on April 7, 2015 and subsequently amended by an Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2, which were approved by PMI's stockholders on February 15, 2016 and May 31, 2016, respectively (as amended, the "2015 Plan"“2015 Plan” and together with the 2005 Plan, “Stock Plans”). In March 2015, the 2005 Plan expired, except that any awards granted under the 2005 Plan prior to its expiration remain in effect pursuant to their terms. As of December 31, 2017,2019, under the 2015 Plan, options to purchase up to 62,489,35895,037,086 shares of PMI's common stockCommon Stock are reserved and may be granted to employees, directors, and consultants by PMI’s Board of Directors and stockholders to promote the success of Prosper’s business. Options generally vest 25% one year from the vesting commencement date and 1/48th per month thereafter or vest 50% two years from
F-37


the vesting commencement date and 1/48 per month thereafter or vest 1/36th per month from the vesting commencement date. In no event are options exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant.
The number of options, restricted stock units and amounts per share reflects a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016.Stock Options
Stock Option Reprice
On May 3, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of PMI approved a stock option repricing program (the “2016 Reprice”) authorizing PMI’s officers to reprice certain outstanding stock options held by employees and directors that had exercise prices above the current fair market value of PMI’s common stock.  The repricing was effected on May 16, 2016 for eligible directors and employees located in the United States and on May 19, 2016 for eligible employees located in Israel.
Common Stock. On March 17, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of PMI approved a stock option repricing program (the “2017 Reprice” and together(together with the 2016 Reprice,repricing program, the "Repricings"“Repricings”), authorizing PMI’s officers to reprice certain outstanding stock options held by employees and directors that had exercise prices above the current fair market value of PMI’s common stock.  The 2017 Reprice was effected on March 17, 2017 for eligible directors and employees. Common Stock. 
Prosper believes that the Repricings will encourage the continued service of valued employees and directors and motivate them to perform at high


levels, both of which are critical to Prosper’s continued success. Prosper has incurred and expects to incur additional stockshare based compensation charges as a result of the Repricings. The financial statement impact of the above Repricings was $1.90.3 million, $0.8 million and $2.2$1.9 million in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and respectively. As of December 31, 2016, respectively, as well as $1.3 million2019, the unamortized Repricings amount (net of forfeitures) thatwas immaterial and will be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period of 1.5 years.
Early Exercised Stock Options
The balance of stock options that were early exercised under the 2005 Plan as of December 31, 2017 is not material.0.3 years.
Stock Option Activity
Stock option activity under the 2005 Plan and 2015 PlanStock Plans is summarized as follows for the years below:
 
Options
Issued and
Outstanding
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted Average
Contractual Term
(in years)
Balance as of January 1, 201741,395,719
 $1.48
  
Options granted37,964,549
 $0.28
  
Options exercised – vested(606,284) $0.16
  
Options forfeited(20,123,445) $0.74
  
Option expirations(2,500) $0.22
  
Balance as of December 31, 201758,628,039
 $0.25
 8.62
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 201750,670,325
 $0.25
 8.62
Options vested and exercisable at December 31, 201727,189,177
 $0.20
 7.99
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we granted stock options to purchase 37,964,549 shares2019 as follows:
 
Options
Issued and
Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-Average
Contractual Term
(in years)
Aggregate intrinsic value(1)
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 201971,021,698  $0.33  8.20
     Options granted14,792,348  $0.24   
     Options exercised(173,356) $0.15   
     Options forfeited(9,350,233) $0.38   
     Option expirations(53,700) $0.30  
Balance as of December 31, 201976,236,757  $0.31  7.41$169  
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 201962,647,818  $0.31  7.41$139  
Options vested and exercisable at December 31, 201950,693,384  $0.28  6.68$169  
(1) Aggregate intrinsic value represents the excess of common stock at a weighted average grant datethe fair value of $0.28 per share.
Other Information Regardingour Common Stock Options
Additional information regarding common stock options outstanding as of December 31, 20172019 over the exercise price of the outstanding in-the-money options.

Additional information pertaining to PMI's Common Stock option activities is as follows:follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Year ended December 31,
201920182017
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted (per share)$0.11  $0.52  $0.28  
   Options Outstanding Options Vested and Exercisable
 
Range of
Exercise
Prices
 
Number
Outstanding
 
Weighted –
Avg.
Remaining
Life
 
Weighted –
Avg.
Exercise
Price
 
Number
Vested
 
Weighted -
Avg.
Exercise
Price
$0.02 - 0.20 4,768,290
 6.04 $0.11
 4,768,290
 $0.11
 0.21 - 0.50 46,316,491
 8.69 0.22
 22,398,767
 0.22
 0.51 - 1.13 7,543,258
 9.84 0.53
 22,120
 1.13
$0.02 - 1.13 58,628,039
 8.62 $0.25
 27,189,177
 $0.20

Valuation
The fair value of options granted to employees is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. This valuation model for stock-basedshare based compensation expense requires Prosper to make assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the calculation, including the fair value of PMI’s common stock,Common Stock, the expected term (the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding), the volatility of PMI’s common stock,Common Stock, a risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends. Given the absence of a publicly traded market, Prosper considered numerous objective and subjective factors to determine the fair value of PMI’s common stockCommon Stock at each grant date. These factors included, but were not limited to: (i) contemporaneous valuations of common stockCommon Stock performed by unrelated third-party specialists;specialists, (ii) the prices for PMI’s preferred stock sold to outside investors;investors, (iii) the rights, preferences and privileges of PMI’s preferred stock relative to PMI’s common stock;
F-38


Common Stock; (iv) the lack of marketability of PMI’s common stock;Common Stock, (v) developments in the business;business, (vi) secondary transactions of PMI’s common and


preferred shares, and (vii) the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a merger or acquisition of Prosper, given prevailing market conditions. As PMI’s stock is not publicly traded volatility for stock options is based on an average of the historical volatilities of the common stockCommon Stock of several entities with characteristics similar to those of Prosper. The expected term assumptions were determined based on the vesting terms, exercise terms and contractual lives of the options using the simplified method. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option. Prosper uses an expected dividend yield of zero as it does not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Prosper also estimates forfeitures of unvested stock options. Expected forfeitures are based on Prosper’s historical experience. To the extent actual forfeitures differ from the estimates, the difference will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. NoNaN compensation cost is recorded for stock options that do not vest.
The fair value of PMI’s stock option awards forgranted during the yearyears ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted average assumptions:
December 31,
 201920182017
Volatility of Common Stock46.70 %44.04 %49.24 %
Risk-free interest rate1.95 %2.78 %2.12 %
Expected life6.0 years6.0 years6.0 years
Dividend yield%%%
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Volatility of common stock49.24% 50.88% 55.69%
Risk-free interest rate2.12% 1.29% 1.74%
Expected life6.0 years
 5.8 years
 6.0 years
Dividend yield% % %
PMI did not grant any performance-based options in 2015, 2016,2019, 2018, or 2017.
Restricted Stock Unit ActivityUnits
During the years ended December 31, 2015, 20162018 and 2017, PMI began grantinggranted restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to certain employees that are subject to three-yearthree-year vesting terms or four-yearfour-year vesting terms and the occurrence of a liquidity event.
The aggregate fair value of the RSUs PMI granted in 2018 and 2017 was $1.9 million and $3 thousand. thousand, respectively. PMI did not grant any RSUs to employees during 2019.
The following table summarizes the activities for PMI’s RSUs during 2017:2019:
 Number of SharesWeighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 20194,856,141  $0.96  
     Granted—  $—  
     Vested—  $—  
     Forfeited(53,000) $1.90  
Unvested at December 31, 20194,803,141  $0.95  
 Number of Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 20171,995,159
 2.16
Granted12,500
 0.22
Vested
 
Forfeited(608,479) 2.18
Unvested - December 31, 20171,399,180
 2.16

Share Based Compensation
The following table presents the amount of stock-basedshare based compensation related to stock-based awards granted to employees recognized in Prosper’s consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations during the periods presentedOperations (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Origination and Servicing$417  $911  $996  
Sales and Marketing243  451  553  
General and Administrative3,868  7,039  10,689  
$4,528  $8,401  $12,238  
 December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Origination and Servicing$996
 $2,004
 $1,231
Sales and Marketing553
 2,914
 2,561
General and Administrative10,689
 14,824
 9,219
Restructuring
 45
 
Total stock based compensation$12,238
 $19,787
 $13,011


During the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, Prosper capitalized $294capitalized $310 thousand, $718$392 thousand and $623$294 thousand, respectively, of stock-basedshare based compensation as internal use software and website developmentdevelopment costs. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the unamortized stock-basedshare based compensation expense adjusted for forfeiture estimates related to Prosper Prosper's
F-39


employees’ unvested stock-basedshare based awards was approximately $13.8approximately $3.4 million, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of approximately 1.8approximately 2.2 years.
13.
15. Restructuring
On May 3,During 2016, Prosper adopted a strategic restructuring of its business. ThisThe restructuring was intended to streamline our operations and support future growth efforts. Under this restructuring, Prosper closed its Salt Lake City, Utah location.  As a result of this restructuring, Prosper terminated 167 employees across all locations.  In December 2016, Prosper shut down itsand Tel Aviv, location, resultingIsrael locations.
In the year ended December 31, 2019, Prosper's restructuring costs relate to accretion and changes in the termination of 31 employees.
In addition to the employment costs associated with the restructuring, Prosper also subleased, or may sublease in the future, space in our existing office space that isloss estimates for properties no longer needed due to the reduction in headcount.use. Other than accretion and changes in sublease loss estimates, Prosper does not expect any additional restructuring charges related to this restructuring.
The following table summarizes the activities related to Prosper's restructuring plan (in thousands):
Facilities Related
Balance as of January 1, 2018$3,244 
   Adjustments to expense1,486 
   Sublease cash receipts370 
   Less: Cash paid(3,126)
Balance as of December 31, 2018$1,974 

Upon adoption of Topic 842 Leases on January 1, 2019, the restructuring liability related to the properties no longer in use was transferred to right-of-use (ROU) asset in accordance with ASC 842-10-65-1. The ROU asset will be depreciated over the useful life of the asset in accordance with ASC 842-20-25-7(a).
 Severance Related Facilities Related Total
Balance January 1, 2016
 
 
   Adjustments to expense7,256
 8,735
 15,991
   Transfer from deferred rent
 764
 764
   Less: Cash paid(6,659) (3,447) (10,106)
Balance December 31, 2016597
 6,052
 6,649
   Adjustments to expense(13) 1,227
 1,214
   Sublease cash receipts
 210
 210
   Less: Cash paid(584) (4,245) (4,829)
Balance December 31, 2017$
 $3,244
 $3,244
14.16. Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (the “Act”) was enacted resulting in significant changes to tax reform legislation (“the Act”) received its final required approval. The Act includeslaw, including a broad range of tax reform proposals affecting businesses, includingreduction to the corporate tax rates, business deductions, and international tax provisions. Many of these provisions significantly differ from current US tax law, resulting in financial reporting implications. Some of the changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, immediate expensing of certain depreciable assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017 and uncertainties around the tax accounting for debt instrument income under IRC Section 451.
Subsequent The Act did not give rise to the enactment of the Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), which provides guidanceany material impact on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act.  SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes ("ASC 740").  In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete.  To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in theProsper's consolidated financial statements.  If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act.  
Since the Tax Act was passed late in the fourth quarter of 2017, and ongoing Treasury guidance and accounting interpretation are expected over the next 12 months, we consider the accounting of the current period net operating loss carryforwards, net servicing rights and immediate expensing of certain depreciable assets acquired and placed in service after


September 27, 2017 to be the most significant provisional items.  Upon further guidance from Treasury and the IRS around certain computations within deferred taxes, we will update our ongoing analysis of final year-end data and tax positions. We expect to complete our analysis within the measurement period in accordance with SAB 118.
The components of income tax are as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Current:  
Federal$—  $—  $—  
State—  —  —  
Foreign—  24  —  
Total Current Income Tax (Benefit) Expense—  24  —  
Deferred:  
Federal47  47  (579) 
State52  33  37  
Foreign 68  34  
Total Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit)100148  (508) 
Total Income Tax Expense (Benefit)$100  $172  $(508) 

F-40

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Current:     
Federal$
 $
 $
State
 
 
Foreign
 124
 (5)
Total Current Income Tax (Benefit)
 124
 (5)
Deferred: 
  
  
Federal(579) 394
 320
State37
 28
 25
Foreign34
 
 
Total Deferred Income Tax(508) 422
 345
Total Income Tax$(508) $546
 $340

The income tax expenseIncome Tax Expense (benefit) differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34%21% to pretax loss as a result of the following:
 Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Federal tax at statutory rate21 %21 %34 %
State tax at statutory rate (net of federal benefit)%%%
Change in U.S. Tax Rate Applied to Deferred Taxes— %— %(31)%
Incentive Stock Options(4)%(3)%(1)%
Preferred Stock Warrants%%(21)%
Change in valuation allowance(33)%(32)%11 %
Other(1)%%%
 — %— %— %
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Federal tax at statutory rate34 % 34 % 34 %
State tax at statutory rate (net of federal benefit)7 % 7 % 12 %
Change to Uncertain Tax Position %  % 10 %
Permanent Items % (1)%  %
Change in U.S. Tax Rate Applied to Deferred Taxes

(31)%  %  %
Incentive Stock Options(1)% (2)% (9)%
Acquisition Related Costs %  % (3)%
Preferred Stock Warrants(21)%  %  %
Change in valuation allowance11 % (37)% (46)%
Credits and Reserves %  %  %
Other1 % (1)% 1 %
  %  % (1)%

Temporary items that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

 December 31,
 20192018
Net operating loss carry forwards$87,834  $82,510  
Research & other credits602  668  
Fixed assets42  463  
Stock compensation10,261  9,237  
Accrued liabilities1,858  3,256  
Restructuring liability—  615  
Other—   
Lease Obligation5,182  —  
     Deferred tax assets105,779  96,753  
Fair value of loans—  (248) 
Net servicing rights(2,843) (3,375) 
Intangible assets(1,067) (721) 
Foreign Earnings(69) (68) 
Right of Use Asset(3,816) —  
     Deferred tax liabilities(7,795) (4,412) 
Net deferred tax asset97,984  92,341  
Valuation allowance(98,458) (92,714) 
Net deferred tax liability$(474) $(373) 


 December 31,
 2017 2016
Net operating loss carry forwards$74,890
 $85,759
Research & other credits725
 626
Settlement liability
 1,230
Stock compensation7,653
 7,300
Accrued liabilities3,028
 4,884
Restructuring liability974
 2,424
Other21
 62
Deferred tax assets87,291
 102,285
Fair value of loans(493) (1,045)
Net servicing rights(3,500) (4,895)
Fixed assets(73) (1,226)
Intangible assets(2,357) (3,226)
Foreign Earnings(187) (270)
Deferred tax liabilities(6,610) (10,662)
Net deferred tax assets80,681
 91,623
Valuation allowance(80,906) (92,389)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(225) $(766)
Prosper has determined that its net deferred tax asset did not satisfy the recognition criteria set forth in ASC Topic 740 and, accordingly, established a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance as of December 31, 2017, decreased2019, increased by $11.5$5.8 million to $80.9$98.5 million from $92.4$92.7 million in the prior fiscal year. Under ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASC Topic 740”), a valuation allowance must be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The amount of valuation allowance would be based upon management’s best estimate of Prosper’s ability to realize the net deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance can subsequently be reduced when management believes that the assets are realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis.
The Internal Revenue Code imposes substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating losses and tax credits in the event of an “ownership change” of a corporation. Accordingly, Prosper’s ability to utilize net operating losses and credit carryforwards may be limited in the future as the result of such an “ownership change.”
Prosper files Federalfederal and various state income tax returns. Prosper has net operating loss carryforwards for both federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $282.2$326.6 million and $305.4$360.5 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2017,2019, available to reduce future income subject to income taxes. The federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2025.2026. The state net operating loss carryforwards began expiring in 2017.2019. All net operating loss carryforwards are subject to a full valuation allowance. Prosper has federal and California research and development tax credits of approximately $428$428.5 thousand and $450$449.5 thousand, respectively. The federal research credits will begin to expire in 2034 and the California
F-41


research credits have no expiration date. Prosper also has California enterprise zone credits of $1.1 million that will begin to expire in 2024.
The following table summarizes Prosper’s activity related to its unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):
Balance as of January 1, 2018$112 
     Decrease related to 2018 tax year position— 
Balance as of December 31, 2018$112 
     Decrease related to 2019 tax year position tax year position— 
Balance as of December 31, 2019$112 
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
Balance at January 1,$913
 $913
Decrease related to current year tax position(801) 
Balance at December 31,$112
 $913

NoneNaN of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect Prosper’s effective tax rate if these amounts are recognized due to the full valuation allowance. 


Prosper’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.Income Tax Expense. As of December 31, 2017,2019, Prosper has not0t incurred any interest or penalties.
All tax returns will remain open for examination by the federal and most state taxing authorities for 3 yearsthree and 4four years, respectively, from the date of utilization of any net operating loss carryforwards or research and development credits.
15.
17. Consortium Purchase Agreement
On February 27, 2017, Prosper entered into a series of agreements (the “Consortium Purchase Agreement”) with a consortium of investors (the "Consortium"“Consortium”), pursuant to which the Consortium has agreed to purchase borrower loansBorrower Loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $5.0 billion (including certain loans purchased by one of the investors prior to the date of the Consortium Purchase Agreement). PFL will bewas obligated to offer for purchase minimum monthly volumes of eligible loans to the Consortium, for the Consortium to elect to purchase. The Consortium Purchase Agreement ended in May 2019.
In connection with the Consortium Purchase Agreement, PMI issued to the Consortium three3 warrant certificates to purchase up to an aggregate 177,720,706 shares of PMI’s Series F Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share.share (the “Warrant Shares”).
The Consortium’s right to exercise the Series F Warrant iswas subject to monthly vesting during the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement based upon the volume of loans the Consortium electselected to purchase (if any) in each month, subject to certain cure rights such as offering additional loans for sale in subsequent periods. Pursuant to these cure rights, if the Consortium failsfailed to respond to offers for allocation, purchase or funding, the Consortium cancould take advantage of a designated period of time to cure such failure. There have beenwere no such failures by the Consortium to date.during the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the Series F Warrant Agreement, the Warrant Shares may also vest in full upon a change of control of PMI, insolvency of PMI or PFL, certain breaches of contract by PMI or PFL that are not cured within a defined cure period and upon the occurrence of certain other events set forth in the Series F Warrant Agreement.
On vesting of the Series F warrants,Warrants, Prosper recordsrecorded a liability as "ConvertibleConvertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability"Liability on the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets at fair value and a corresponding amount as "FairFair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans"Loans on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the vested warrants are recorded in "Other Expenses"Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations. Additionally, in connection with the execution of the Consortium Purchase Agreement, certain previously issued rebates were settled by an issuance of vested Series F Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. The difference in fair value of these warrants over the cash settlement price iswas recorded in "ChangeChange in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants"Warrants on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations.
The following represents the loans purchased and warrants vested under the Consortium Purchase Agreement:Agreement (dollars in thousands):
Loans AcquiredWarrants Vested
Balance January 1, 2018$1,826,527  75,186,002  
Loans purchased by the consortium during the year ended December 31, 20181,240,805  79,726,978  
Balance as of December 31, 20183,067,332  154,912,980  
Loans purchased by the consortium during the year ended December 31, 2019235,951  22,807,726  
Balance December 31, 2019$3,303,283  177,720,706  

F-42


 Loans Acquired (in thousands) Warrants Vested
On signing of the Consortium Purchase Agreement$
 9,830,494
Loans Purchased by the Consortium during the year ended December 31, 20171,826,527
 65,355,508
Total as of December 31, 2017$1,826,527
 75,186,002
In addition to the $1.8 billion above, theThe aggregate warrants vested on signingbalance of 177,720,706 in the Consortium Purchase Agreement weretable above includes vested warrants issued to settle certain rebates on $0.3 billion of whole loan purchases by members of the Consortium prior to the signing of the Consortium Purchase Agreement.   This $0.3 billion also reducesAgreement in February 2017. As such, aggregate loan purchases by the up to $5.0 billion aggregate amountConsortium under the Consortium Purchase Agreement.    Agreement including the $0.3 billion of whole loan purchases were $3.6 billion.
16.
18. Leases
Prosper has operating leases for corporate offices and datacenters. Our leases have remaining lease terms of 3 months to 7 years. Some of the lease agreements include options to extend the lease term for up to an additional 5 years. Rental expense under operating lease arrangements was $4.5 million, $4.2 million and $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2018 and 2017, respectively. Additionally, Prosper subleases certain leased office space to third parties when it determines there is excess leased capacity. Sublease revenue from operating lease arrangements was $0.8 million, $0.8 million and $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Operating Lease Right-of-Use (“ROU”) Assets
The following represents the operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets as of December 31, 2019, which are included in "Property and Equipment, Net" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, 2019
Gross
Carrying Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying Value
ROU assets - office buildings$15,921  $3,262  $12,659  
ROU assets - other292  232  60  
$16,213  $3,494  $12,719  

Lease Liabilities
Prosper has entered into various non-cancelable operating leases for certain offices with contractual lease periods expiring between 2020 and 2026.
The table below presents the present value of Prosper's future minimum rental payments for the remaining terms of the operating leases (in thousands):
December 31, 2019
2020$5,236  
20215,130  
20225,014  
20231,562  
2024871  
Thereafter1,820  
Total future minimum lease payments19,633  
     Less: Imputed interest(2,126) 
Present value of future minimum lease payments$17,507  

The table below presents future minimum rental payments at December 31, 2018, net of minimum sublease rentals of $5.3 million, for the remaining terms of the operating leases (in thousands):
F-43


December 31, 2018
2019$4,536  
20204,683  
20214,456  
20224,319  
2023847  
Thereafter387  
Total future operating lease obligations$19,228  

Because the rate implicit in each lease is not readily determinable, we use our incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of the lease payments. Values used to determine present value of leases is as follows (dollars in thousands):
December 31, 2019
Cash paid for operating leases year-to-date$5,228 
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease obligations (1)
$21,706 
Weighted average remaining lease term4.16 years
Weighted average discount rate5.54 %
(1) Consists of $21.7 million for operating leases existing on January 1, 2019.

19. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of its operations, Prosper becomes involved in various legal actions. Prosper maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. Prosper does not believe it is probable that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any such matters will have a material effect on Prosper's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


Future Minimum Lease Payments
Prosper has entered into various non-cancelable operating leases for certain offices with contractual lease periods expiring between 2022 and 2027. Prosper recognized total rental expenses under operating leases of $4.7 million, $6.9 million and $4.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We have subleases related to certain of our operating leases. Income from existing subleases are offset against future minimum rental payments. Sublease income under all operating subleases for the years ended December 31, 20172016 and 2015 is $0.4 million$0, and $0 respectively.
The table below presents future minimum rental payments, net of minimum sublease rentals of $7.1 million, for the remaining terms of the operating leases (in thousands):
2018$4,529
20195,046
20205,534
20215,492
20225,377
Thereafter5,602
Total$31,580
The payments in the above table include amounts that have been accrued for as part of the restructuring liability in Note 13 Restructuring. Restructuring accrual balances related to operating facility leases were $3.2 million at December 31, 2017.
Operating Commitments
Prosper has entered into an agreement with WebBank, under which all Borrower Loans originated through the marketplace are made byunder WebBank's bank charter. On February 1, 2019, Prosper and WebBank under its bank charter.extended the terms of their Agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, the marketing fee that Prosper receives in connection with the origination of each loan is partially reduced by an amount (the “Designated Amount”) calculated as a percentage of the principal amount of such loan based on the aggregate principal amount of loans originated for the applicable month. To the extent the aggregate Designated Amount for all loans originated during any month is less than $143,500,$143.5 thousand, Prosper is required to pay WebBank an amount equal to such deficiency. Accordingly, the minimum fee is $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 is $1.7 million. The minimum fee is $0.9 million in 2019. years 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively.
Additionally, under the agreement with WebBank, Prosper is required to maintain a minimum net liquidity of $15 million at all times during the term of the agreement. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. Violation of this covenant can result in termination of the contract with WebBank. At December 31, 2017 the Company2019, Prosper was in compliance with the covenant.
Loan Purchase Commitments
Prosper has entered into anUnder the terms of Prosper's agreement with WebBank, Prosper is committed to purchase $29.3$18.6 million of Borrower Loans that WebBank originated during the last two business days of the year ended December 31, 2017 and the first business day of the quarter ending March 31, 2018. Prosper will purchase these Borrower Loans within the first three business days of the quarter ending March 31, 2018.2019.
Repurchase and Indemnification ContingencyObligation
Under the terms of the loan purchase agreements between Prosper and investors that participate in the Whole Loan Channel, Prosper may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Borrower Loan from an investor. Generally, these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding protocols or a violation of the applicable federal, state or local lending laws. Prosper recognizes a liability at fair value for the repurchase obligation when the Borrower Loans are sold. The fair value of the indemnification and repurchase obligation is estimated based on historical experience and the initial fair value is insignificant. Prosper recognizes a liability for the repurchase and indemnification obligation when the Borrower Loans are issued. Indemnified or repurchasedexperience. Repurchased Borrower Loans associated with violations of federal, state or local lending laws or
F-44


verifiable identity theft are written off at the time of repurchase or at the time an indemnification payment is made.repurchase. The maximum potential amount of future payments associated under thisthe repurchase obligation is the


outstanding balances of the Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan channels, which at December 31, 20172019 is $3.7$3.1 billion. Prosper hadhas accrued $0.8$0.4 million and $0.6$0.9 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, respectively, in regardrelated to this obligation.      
Regulatory Contingencies
Prosper accrues for contingencies when a loss from such contingencies is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss is probable and if it is possible to quantify the amount of the estimated loss, Prosper reviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on at least a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If Prosper determines that an unfavorable outcome is not probable or that the amount of a loss cannot be reasonably estimated, Prosper does not accrue for a potential litigation loss. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and Prosper can estimate a range of outcomes, an amount is recorded which management considers to be the best estimate within the range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if management cannot quantify the amount of the estimated loss, then the low end of the range of the potential losses is recorded.
Securities Law Compliance
In 2017, Prosper madepaid the fourth and final annual installment of $3$3.0 million regardingin a settlement toof a class action lawsuit that was agreed to in 2013.

SEC Inquiry
In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors. Prosper was advised by the SEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. On April 19, 2019, the SEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million was paid in full in April 2019.
17.West Virginia Matter
In January 2018, the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and practices of PMI and PFL that the Attorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to which Prosper responded with such information as was requested by the Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, Prosper received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that, without in any way admitting that any of its prior practices were in violation of the Consumer Act, Prosper agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. Prosper is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.

We cannot predict the outcome of the matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been made.

No loans have been originated through the Prosper platform to West Virginians since June 2016.

20. Related Parties
Since Prosper’s inception, it has engaged in various transactions with its directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of its voting securities, and with immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders. Prosper believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to Prosper than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
F-45


Prosper’s executive officers, directors who are not executive officers and certain affiliates participate on Prosper’sin its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes. The aggregate amount of the Notes purchased and the income earned by parties deemed to be affiliates and related parties of Prosper as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are summarized below (in thousands):
Aggregate PurchasesInterest Earned
 2019201820192018
Executive officers and management$23  $29  $ $ 
Directors464  421  56  45  
$487  $450  $61  $47  

The balance of Notes held by officers, directors who are not executive officers and certain affiliates are as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
 20192018
Executive officers and management$35  $32  
Directors682  569  
$717  $601  


Related Party 
Aggregate Amount of
Notes Purchased
 
Interest Earned on
Notes
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Executive officers and management $29
 $1,065
 $109
 $225
Directors 366
 508
 40
 34
Total $395
 $1,573
 $149
 $259
Related Party Notes balance as of December 31,
  2017 2016
Executive officers and management $38
 $1,620
Directors 553
 537
  $591
 $2,157
18.21. Postretirement Benefit Plans
Prosper has a 401(k) plan that covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Prosper’s contributions to the plan are discretionary. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, Prosper has contributed $2.2$2.3 million, $2.6$2.0 million and $1.9$2.2 million, respectively, to the 401(k) plan, respectively.plan.
19.
22. Significant Concentrations  
Prosper is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, assetsasset managers, and investment funds to provide the funds to allow WebBank to originate Borrower Loans that the third party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the largest party purchased a total of 70%9.4% of those loans. This compares to 20%, 16% and 9%43.7% for the three largest partiesparty for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Further, a significant portion of our business is dependent on funding through the Whole Loan Channel, for which 93%94% and 90%94% of Borrower Loans were originated through the Whole Loan Channel in the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.  
Prosper receives all of its transaction fee revenue from WebBank. Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank for our services in facilitating originations of Borrower Loans issued by WebBank. The rate of the transaction fee for each individual


Borrower Loan is based on the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan. No individual borrower or investor accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net revenue for any of the periods presented.    
20.
23. Segments
Our chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, we havethe Company has a single reporting and operating segment.


24. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, other than as recorded or disclosed within these consolidated financial statements and related notes, the Company has determined no additional subsequent events were required to be recognized or disclosed.
F-46


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Prosper Funding LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Funding LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, member’s equity, and cash flows, , for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"“financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Emphasis of a Matter
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company earns significant amounts of revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, CA
March 23, 201820, 2020
We have served as the Company's Auditor since 2014






F-47


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
December 31,
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
20192018
Assets 
  Assets  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$8,223
 $6,929
Cash and Cash Equivalents$7,462  $11,163  
Restricted Cash140,092
 147,983
Restricted Cash110,399  136,018  
Short Term Investments
 1,280
Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value49
 624
Borrower Loans Receivable at Fair Value293,005
 315,627
Borrower Loans, at Fair ValueBorrower Loans, at Fair Value245,137  263,522  
Property and Equipment, Net7,953
 10,095
Property and Equipment, Net7,549  6,426  
Servicing Assets14,598
 12,461
Servicing Assets14,888  15,550  
Other Assets125
 186
Other Assets749  323  
Total Assets$464,045
 $495,185
Total Assets$386,184  $433,002  
Liabilities and Member's Equity 
  
Liabilities and Member's Equity  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$745
 $2,223
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$2,133  $4,690  
Payable to Related Party2,889
 1,899
Payable to Related Party2,679  1,283  
Payable to Investors132,112
 141,625
Payable to Investors105,287  127,253  
Notes at Fair Value293,948
 316,236
Notes, at Fair ValueNotes, at Fair Value244,171  264,003  
Other Liabilities3,985
 1,877
Other Liabilities3,727  4,528  
Total Liabilities433,679
 463,860
Total Liabilities357,997  401,757  
Member's Equity 
  
Member's Equity  
Member's Equity24,904
 30,704
Member's Equity15,904  24,904  
Retained Earnings5,462
 621
Retained Earnings12,283  6,341  
Total Member's Equity30,366
 31,325
Total Member's Equity28,187  31,245  
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity$464,045
 $495,185
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity$386,184  $433,002  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-48


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(amounts in thousands)
Year ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 201920182017
Revenues     Revenues  
Operating Revenues     Operating Revenues  
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$101,500
 $36,630
 $57,919
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$49,818  $105,709  $101,500  
Servicing Fees, Net25,963
 28,604
 16,218
Servicing Fees, Net26,368  27,943  25,963  
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(48,691) 3,637
 14,151
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(5,058) (58,027) (48,691) 
Other Revenues170
 478
 1,500
Other Revenues155  270  170  
Total Operating Revenues78,942
 69,349
 89,788
Total Operating Revenues71,283  75,895  78,942  
Interest Income on Borrower Loans47,208
 44,649
 41,380
Interest Income on Borrower Loans41,146  43,569  47,208  
Interest Expense on Notes(43,954) (41,187) (38,174)Interest Expense on Notes(38,492) (40,656) (43,954) 
Net Interest Income3,254
 3,462
 3,206
Net Interest Income2,654  2,913  3,254  
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(514) (372) 59
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, NetChange in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(375) (701) (514) 
Total Net Revenues81,682
 72,439
 93,053
Total Net Revenues73,562  78,107  81,682  
Expenses 
  
  
Expenses   
Administration Fee – Related Party70,359
 62,203
 62,786
Administration Fee – Related Party62,575  70,491  70,359  
Servicing6,103
 5,395
 3,705
Servicing5,012  6,140  6,103  
General and Administrative379
 1,321
 1,227
General and Administrative33  597  379  
Other Expenses, Net
 30,704
 
Total Expenses76,841
 99,623
 67,718
Total Expenses67,620  77,228  76,841  
Total Net Income (Loss)$4,841
 $(27,184) $25,335
Net IncomeNet Income$5,942  $879  $4,841  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-49


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity
(amounts in thousands)
 
Member’s
Equity
 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 Total
Balance as of January 1, 2015$29,619
 $16,672
 $46,291
Distributions to Parent

(29,370) (6,130) (35,500)
Transfer of Servicing Rights to Parent

(249) 
 (249)
Adjustment to Servicing Rights on Transition to Fair Value


 428
 428
Net Income


 25,335
 25,335
Balance as of December 31, 2015$
 $36,305
 $36,305
Distributions to Parent
 (8,500) (8,500)
Contributions by Parent30,704
 
 30,704
Net Income (Loss)
 (27,184) (27,184)
Balance as of December 31, 2016$30,704
 $621
 $31,325
Distributions to Parent(5,800) 
 (5,800)
Net Income
 4,841
 4,841
Balance as of December 31, 2017$24,904
 $5,462
 $30,366
Member’s
Equity
Retained EarningsTotal
Balance January 1, 2017$30,704  $621  $31,325  
Distributions to Parent(5,800) —  (5,800) 
Net Income—  4,841  4,841  
Balance December 31, 201724,904  5,462  30,366  
Distributions to Parent—  —  —  
Net Income—  879  879  
Balance December 31, 201824,904  6,341  31,245  
Distributions to Parent(9,000) —  (9,000) 
Net Income—  5,942  5,942  
Balance December 31, 2019$15,904  $12,283  $28,187  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-50


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(amounts in thousands)
 For the Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities: 
    
Net Income (Loss)$4,841
 $(27,184) $25,335
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: 
  
  
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes514
 372
 (59)
Other Non-Cash Changes in Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes86
 176
 (57)
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(14,138) (9,634) (14,561)
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights11,862
 10,620
 4,176
Depreciation and Amortization5,853
 4,083
 3,161
Loss on Contract Termination
 30,704
 
Other, Net
 (128) 
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: 
  
  
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value(2,619,130) (1,979,952) (3,517,467)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value2,619,709
 1,979,352
 3,525,759
Restricted Cash Except for those Related to Investing Activities11,223
 (5,268) (68,776)
Other Assets61
 (64) (118)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities(1,478) 101
 1,510
Payable to Investors(9,513) 5,964
 71,852
Net Related Party Receivable/Payable2,371
 (1,260) 2,880
Other Liabilities2,247
 954
 539
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities14,508
 8,836
 34,174
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: 
  
  
Purchase of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value(194,887) (217,582) (197,436)
Principal Payment of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value192,054
 173,710
 151,893
Purchase of Short Term Investments
 (1,280) (1,277)
Maturities of Short Term Investments1,280
 1,277
 1,274
Purchases of Property and Equipment(5,092) (5,589) (9,211)
Changes in Restricted Cash Related to Investing Activities(3,332) (2,778) 1,942
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(9,977) (52,242) (52,815)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: 
  
  
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes Held at Fair Value194,391
 217,767
 197,228
Payments of Notes Held at Fair Value(191,828) (173,958) (151,838)
Cash Distributions to Parent(5,800) (8,500) (35,500)
Loan Advances to Parent
 
 (10,000)
Loan Repayments from Parent
 
 10,000
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities(3,237) 35,309
 9,890
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents1,294
 (8,097) (8,751)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of the Year6,929
 15,026
 23,777
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of the Year$8,223
 $6,929
 $15,026
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: 
  
  
Cash Paid for Interest$43,776
 $40,597
 $38,168
Non-Cash Operating Activity - Servicing Rights Fair Value Adjustment
 
 428
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net225
 1,606
 1,436
Non-Cash Financing Activity, Distribution to Parent$
 $
 $249
Non-Cash Financing Activity, Contribution by Parent$
 $30,704
 $
Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net Income$5,942  $879  $4,841  
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:  
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net374  701  514  
Other Non-Cash Changes in Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes(694) (239) 86  
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(13,033) (14,315) (14,138) 
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights13,682  13,316  11,862  
Depreciation and Amortization4,397  5,664  5,853  
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:   
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value(2,320,560) (2,365,431) (2,619,130) 
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value2,320,560  2,365,470  2,619,709  
Other Assets(426) (198) 61  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities(2,557) 3,945  (1,478) 
Payable to Investors(21,966) (4,859) (9,513) 
Net Related Party Receivable/Payable2,251  (2,482) 2,371  
Other Liabilities(789) 590  2,247  
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities(12,819) 3,041  3,285  
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:   
Purchase of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value(170,326) (177,101) (194,887) 
Principal Payment of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value165,481  175,117  192,054  
Maturities of Short Term Investments—  —  1,280  
Purchases of Property and Equipment(6,374) (3,261) (5,092) 
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(11,219) (5,245) (6,645) 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:   
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes, at Fair Value171,138  176,830  194,391  
Payments of Notes, at Fair Value(167,420) (175,760) (191,828) 
Cash Distributions to Parent(9,000) —  (5,800) 
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities(5,282) 1,070  (3,237) 
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents(29,320) (1,134) (6,597) 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period147,181  148,315  154,912  
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period$117,861  $147,181  $148,315  
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:   
Cash Paid for Interest$39,229  $41,098  $43,776  
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net246  1,101  225  
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets
Cash and Cash Equivalents$7,462  $11,163  $8,223  
Restricted Cash110,399  136,018  140,092  
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$117,861  $147,181  $148,315  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




F-51


Prosper Funding LLC
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Business
Prosper Funding LLC (“PFL”) was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with the sole equity member being Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”). as its sole equity member. Except as the context otherwise requires, as used in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements of Prosper Funding LLC, “Prosper“PFL”, ”Prosper Funding” and the “Company” refer to Prosper Funding” “we,” “us,” and “our” refers to PFL LLC and its wholly owned subsidiary,subsidiaries, Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a Delaware limited liability company, and Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis.
PFLProsper Funding did not have any items of other comprehensive income (loss) during any of the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Prosper Funding was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans and issue Notes through the marketplace. Although Prosper Funding is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper Funding has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. Prosper Funding’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. Prosper Funding seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct entity from PMI.
Since February 1, 2013, all Notes issued and sold through the marketplace are issued, sold and serviced by PFL.Prosper Funding. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the marketplace, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the submission of Borrower Loan applications by potential borrowers, the origination of related Borrower Loans by WebBank and the funding of such Borrower Loans by WebBank. Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between PFLProsper Funding and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the marketplace on behalf of PFL.Prosper Funding. As a result Prosper Funding earns significant revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, PMI.
A borrower who wishes to obtain a loan through the marketplace must post a loan listing or listing, on the marketplace. PFLProsper Funding allocates listings to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from PFL,Prosper Funding, the payments of which are dependent PFL’son Prosper Funding’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from PFL.Prosper Funding.
All loans requested and obtained through the marketplace are unsecured obligations of individual borrowers with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of December 31, 2017.2019. All loans made through the marketplace are funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank. After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to PFL,Prosper Funding, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan. WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.
Prosper Funding’s marketplace is designed to allow investors to invest in Borrower Loans in an opena transparent marketplace, with the aim of allowing both investors and borrowers to benefit financially as well as socially. Prosper Funding believes marketplace lending represents a new model of consumer lending, where individuals and institutions can earn the interest spread of a traditional consumer lender but must also assume the credit risk of a traditional consumer lender.
As of December 31, 2017,2019, Prosper Funding’s marketplace was open to investors in 30 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2017,2019, Prosper Funding’s marketplace was open to borrowers in 4648 states and the District of Columbia. Currently, the marketplace does not operate internationally.


F-52


2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
Prosper Funding’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PFLProsper Funding and its wholly-owned subsidiary PAH. All intercompany balances and transactions between PFLProsper Funding and PAH have been eliminated in consolidation. Prosper


Funding’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of Prosper Funding’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StatesU.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, valuation of servicing rights, valuation of loan trailing fee liability, repurchase and indemnification obligation,obligations, and contingent liabilities. Prosper Funding bases its estimates on historical experience from all Borrower Loans and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Certain Risks
In the normal course of its business, Prosper Funding encounters significant credit risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject Prosper Funding to significant credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, borrower loans held and restricted cash. Prosper Funding places cash and restricted cash with high-quality financial institutions and is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent the amount recorded on the balance sheet exceeds federally insured amounts. Prosper Funding invests cash equivalents in highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase, including money market funds, commercial paper, US treasury securities and US agency securities.
As a lending marketplace, Prosper Funding believes its customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact its customers’ ability or desire to participate on its marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect its business and results of operations.
To the extent that Borrower Loan (including Borrower Loans that have been sold) payments are not made, servicing income will be reduced. A group of Notes corresponding to a particular Borrower Loan is wholly dependent on the repayment of such Borrower Loan. As a result, Prosper Funding does not bear the credit risk on such Borrower Loan.  
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
The determination of whether to consolidate aA variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which we have a variable interest requires a significant amount of analysis and judgment whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE via a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest in a VIE exists if we have both the power to direct the VIE’s activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and a potentially significant economic interest in the VIE. The determination of whether an entity(VIE) is a VIE considers factors, such as (i) whether the entity’slegal entity that has either a total equity investment at riskthat is insufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) when a holder’swhose equity investment at risk lacks any ofinvestors lack the following characteristics of a controlling financial interest:interest. Prosper’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in the direct or indirect ability through voting rights or similar rights to make decisions about a legal entity’s activities that have a significant effect onentity, which change with fluctuations in the fair value of the entity’s success,net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the legal entity. 
As a result of the nature of the retained servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, we are a variable interest holder in certain special purposes entitiesparty that purchase these Borrower Loans.   For all of these entities we either do not havehas both the power to direct the activities that most significantly affectimpact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or we do not have athe right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant economic interest into the VIE. In no case are weProsper consolidates a VIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Prosper assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary therefore, we do not consolidate these entities.   
Management regularly reviews and reconsiders its previous conclusions regarding the status of an entity as a VIE and whether we are required to consolidate such VIE in the consolidated financial statements.on an ongoing basis.
Transfers of Financial Assets


Prosper accounts for transfers of entire financial assets or a participating interest in an entire financial asset as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from Prosper, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and Prosper has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold significantunconditional call options and has not written significant put options on the transferred assets.
In assessing whether control has been surrendered, Prosper sells loans or participating interests in loans via whole loan sale transactionsconsiders whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the fractional note channel. In certain instancesimpact of whole loan sales transactionsall arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the transfer, even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer. Prosper will sell whole loans to unconsolidated VIEs that then securitize the whole loans purchased.
Prosper recognizes ameasures gain or loss on the sale of financial assets by comparingas the net sales proceeds (including fair value of any servicing asset or liability and recourse obligation recognized) toreceived on the sale less the carrying amount of the assetsloans sold. Transfers of financial assets that do not qualify for sale accounting are reported as secured borrowings. Accordingly, the related assets remain on Prosper’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and continue to be reported and accounted for as if the transfer had not occurred. CashThe net proceeds from these transfers are reported as liabilities, with related interest expense recognized over the life of the related assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consistsale represent the fair value of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturitiesany assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, US treasurytransaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and US agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificates of deposit held as collateral as required for loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper Funding has on the platform that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.
Short Term Investments
Short term investments consists of certificates of deposit with a term greater than three months but less than a year that are held as collateral as required for loan funding and servicing activities.recourse obligations.
Fair Value Measurement
Prosper Funding measures the fairFair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with its fair value hierarchy which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. We apply this framework whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.
We define fair value in terms ofis the price that would be received upon the sale ofto sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The price used to measure theProsper uses fair value is not adjusted for transaction costs. Under ASC Topic 820, themeasurements in its fair value measurement also assumes that the transactiondisclosures and to sell an asset occurs in the principal marketrecord Borrower Loans, Loans Held for the asset or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset. The principal market is the market in which Prosper Funding would sell or transfer the asset with the greatest volumeSale, Servicing Assets, Notes, and level of activity for the asset. In determining the principal market for an asset or liability under ASC Topic 820, it is assumed that Prosper Funding has access to the market as of the measurement date. If no market for the asset exists or if Prosper Funding does not have access to the principal market, Prosper Funding uses a hypothetical market.
Under ASC Topic 820, assets and liabilities carriedLoan Trailing Fee Liability at fair value on the balance sheets are classified among three levelsa recurring basis.
The fair value hierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is based on the observability ofwhether the inputs to the valuation methodology used to determine fair value:for measurement are observable:
Level 1 — The valuation is based on quotedQuoted market prices in active markets for identical instruments.


assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such asInputs other than quoted prices for similar instrumentsincluded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in marketsLevel 1 that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologiesobservable for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.asset or liability either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to theUnobservable inputs.
When developing fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow models, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation.
Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, which requires an entity to maximizemeasurements, Prosper maximizes the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimizeminimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments Prosper must utilize unobservable inputs whenin determining fair value due to
F-53


the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identicalIn instances where there is limited or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active andno observable market data, for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value ismeasurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, Borrower Loans, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and Notes. Servicing assets and liabilities are also subject to fair value measurement within the financial statements of PFL. The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short term nature.
As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Notes,Servicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, Prosper Funding believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and NotesServicing Assets should be considered level 3 financial instruments under ASC Topic 820. Ininstruments. Prosper primarily uses a hypothetical transaction as of the measurement date, Prosper Funding believes that differences in the principal marketplace in which the Borrower Loans are originated and the principal marketplace in which Prosper Funding might offer those loans may result in differences between the originated amount of the loans anddiscounted cash flow model to estimate their fair value as of the transaction date. For Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, the fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based uponkey assumptions used in valuation assumptions including prepayment speeds,include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on estimates of the perceived credit risk within each credit grade.rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The obligation to pay principal and interest on any Noteseries of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to lendersinvestors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, the fair value of a groupseries of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursed to such Note holders. As a result, the valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing ofin payments. Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations. The effective interest rate associated with a group of Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee. See
Refer to Note 47 for a roll-forwardadditional fair value disclosures.
Cash and further discussionCash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the significant assumptions used to valuetime of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificates of deposit accounts for loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper Funding has on the marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.
Short Term Investments
Short term investments consists of certificates of deposit with a term greater than three months but less than a year that are held as collateral as required for loan funding and Notes.servicing activities.
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes
Through the Note Channel, Prosper Funding purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues Notesnotes, and holds the Borrower Loans as a receivable until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notesnotes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loan.Loans. Borrower Loans originatedloans funded and Notesnotes issued through the Note Channel are carried on Prosper Funding’s consolidated balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. 
Prosper Funding has adopted the provisionsplaces Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, Prosper stops accruing interest and reverses all accrued but unpaid interest as of ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments (“ASC Topic 825”). ASC Topic 825 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instrumentssuch date. Additionally, Prosper charges-off Borrower Loans and certain other items atLoans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for whichof loans 120 days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from debt sales in subsequent periods.
Management has elected the fair value option has been elected reportedfor Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Notes. Changes in earnings. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful forof Borrower Loans are largely offset by the readerschanges in fair value of Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent design of the financial statements and it allows both theNotes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes to be valued usingare included in “Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net” on the same methodology. The fair value election, with respect to an item, may not be revoked once an election is made. Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Prosper Funding estimates the fair value of such Borrower Loans and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologies adjusted for the expected payment, loss, recoverymethodologies. The key assumptions used in valuation include default rates derived from historical performance and default rates.   The Borrower Loans are not derecognized when a corresponding Note is


issued as Prosper Funding maintains the ability to sell the Borrower Loans without the approvaldiscount rates that reflect estimates of the holdersrates of return that investors would require when investing in the corresponding Notes.financial instruments with similar characteristics.  
F-54


Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper Funding records servicing assetsServicing Assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when Prosper Funding sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of servicing assetsServicing Assets and liabilities is recognized in “Servicing Fees” revenue.revenue as Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in “GainGain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans”Loans while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing rate, is recorded in servicing assetsServicing Assets or liabilities.Liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in “Servicing Assets”Servicing Assets and “OtherOther Liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets.Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Prosper Funding uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan servicing assetsServicing Assets or liabilitiesLiabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that Prosper Funding earns on the Borrower Loans, estimated market servicing feesServicing Fees to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and the current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.  
Loans Held for Sale
Loans Held for Sale are comprised of Borrower Loans held for short durations and are recorded at fair value. The fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions similar to those of other Borrower Loans. We measure Loans Held for Sale at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful for the readers of the financial statements and it allows for the Loans Held for Sale to be measured at fair value similar to Borrower Loans and Notes. The fair value election, with respect to an item, may not be revoked once an election is made.
Software and Website DevelopmentLoan Purchase Commitments
Software and website development representsUnder the software and websiteterms of Prosper's agreement with WebBank, Prosper is committed to purchase $18.6 million of Borrower Loans that PMI has transferred to Prosper Funding.   Prosper Funding does not develop any of its own software or website.  Software and website are included in property and equipment and amortized to expense usingWebBank originated during the straight-line method over their expected lives which is generally one to five years. Prosper Funding evaluates its software assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measured by a comparisonlast two business days of the carrying amountyear ended December 31, 2019.
Repurchase Obligation
Under the terms of the assetloan purchase agreements between Prosper and investors that participate in the Whole Loan Channel, Prosper may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Borrower Loan from an investor. Generally, these circumstances include the future net undiscounted cash flows expectedoccurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to be generated by the asset. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excessproperly follow loan listing or bidding protocols or a violation of the carrying amount overapplicable federal, state or local lending laws. Prosper recognizes a liability at fair value for the repurchase obligation when the Borrower Loans are sold. The fair value of the softwarerepurchase obligation is estimated based on historical experience. Repurchased Borrower Loans associated with violations of federal, state or local lending laws or
F-44


verifiable identity theft are written off at the time of repurchase. The maximum potential amount of future payments associated under the repurchase obligation is the outstanding balances of the Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan channels, which at December 31, 2019 is $3.1 billion. Prosper has accrued $0.4 million and website development asset group.
Payable to Investors
Payable to Investors primarily represents our obligation to investors$0.9 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to cashthis obligation.      
Regulatory Contingencies
Prosper accrues for contingencies when a loss from such contingencies is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss is probable and if it is possible to quantify the amount of the estimated loss, Prosper reviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on at least a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If Prosper determines that an unfavorable outcome is not probable or that the amount of a loss cannot be reasonably estimated, Prosper does not accrue for a potential litigation loss. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and Prosper can estimate a range of outcomes, an amount is recorded which management considers to be the best estimate within the range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if management cannot quantify the amount of the estimated loss, then the low end of the range of the potential losses is recorded.
Securities Law Compliance
In 2017, Prosper paid the fourth and final annual installment of $3.0 million in a settlement of a class action lawsuit that was agreed to in 2013.
SEC Inquiry
In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors. Prosper was advised by the SEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. On April 19, 2019, the SEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million was paid in full in April 2019.
West Virginia Matter
In January 2018, the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and practices of PMI and PFL that the Attorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to which Prosper responded with such information as was requested by the Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, Prosper received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that, without in any way admitting that any of its prior practices were in violation of the Consumer Act, Prosper agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. Prosper is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.

We cannot predict the outcome of the matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been made.

No loans have been originated through the Prosper platform to West Virginians since June 2016.

20. Related Parties
Since Prosper’s inception, it has engaged in various transactions with its directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of its voting securities, and with immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders. Prosper believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to Prosper than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
F-45


Prosper’s executive officers, directors who are not executive officers and certain affiliates participate in its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes. The aggregate amount of the Notes purchased and the income earned by parties deemed to be affiliates and related parties of Prosper as of are summarized below (in thousands):
Aggregate PurchasesInterest Earned
 2019201820192018
Executive officers and management$23  $29  $ $ 
Directors464  421  56  45  
$487  $450  $61  $47  

The balance of Notes held by officers, directors who are not executive officers and certain affiliates are as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
 20192018
Executive officers and management$35  $32  
Directors682  569  
$717  $601  


21. Postretirement Benefit Plans
Prosper has a 401(k) plan that covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in an accountaccordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Prosper’s contributions to the plan are discretionary. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Prosper contributed $2.3 million, $2.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, to the 401(k) plan.

22. Significant Concentrations  
Prosper is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, asset managers, and investment funds to provide the funds to allow WebBank to originate Borrower Loans that the third party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2019, the largest party purchased a total of 9.4% of those loans. This compares to 43.7% for the benefitlargest party for the year ended December 31, 2018. Further, a significant portion of investorsour business is dependent on funding through the Whole Loan Channel, for which 94% and payments-in-process received94% of Borrower Loans were originated through the Whole Loan Channel in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  
Prosper receives all of its transaction fee revenue from borrowers.WebBank. Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank for our services in facilitating originations of Borrower Loans issued by WebBank. The rate of the transaction fee for each individual Borrower Loan is based on the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan. No individual borrower or investor accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net revenue for any of the periods presented.    

Loan Trailing Fee
On July 1, 2016, 23. Segments
Our chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has a single reporting and operating segment.

24. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, other than as recorded or disclosed within these consolidated financial statements and related notes, the Company has determined no additional subsequent events were required to be recognized or disclosed.
F-46


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Prosper Funding signedLLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Funding LLC and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, member’s equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Emphasis of a seriesMatter
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company earns significant amounts of agreementsrevenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, CA
March 20, 2020
We have served as the Company's Auditor since 2014


F-47


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
December 31,
20192018
Assets  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$7,462  $11,163  
Restricted Cash110,399  136,018  
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value245,137  263,522  
Property and Equipment, Net7,549  6,426  
Servicing Assets14,888  15,550  
Other Assets749  323  
Total Assets$386,184  $433,002  
Liabilities and Member's Equity  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$2,133  $4,690  
Payable to Related Party2,679  1,283  
Payable to Investors105,287  127,253  
Notes, at Fair Value244,171  264,003  
Other Liabilities3,727  4,528  
Total Liabilities357,997  401,757  
Member's Equity  
Member's Equity15,904  24,904  
Retained Earnings12,283  6,341  
Total Member's Equity28,187  31,245  
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity$386,184  $433,002  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-48


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Revenues  
Operating Revenues  
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$49,818  $105,709  $101,500  
Servicing Fees, Net26,368  27,943  25,963  
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(5,058) (58,027) (48,691) 
Other Revenues155  270  170  
Total Operating Revenues71,283  75,895  78,942  
Interest Income on Borrower Loans41,146  43,569  47,208  
Interest Expense on Notes(38,492) (40,656) (43,954) 
     Net Interest Income2,654  2,913  3,254  
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(375) (701) (514) 
Total Net Revenues73,562  78,107  81,682  
Expenses   
Administration Fee – Related Party62,575  70,491  70,359  
Servicing5,012  6,140  6,103  
General and Administrative33  597  379  
Total Expenses67,620  77,228  76,841  
Net Income$5,942  $879  $4,841  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-49


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity
(in thousands)
Member’s
Equity
Retained EarningsTotal
Balance January 1, 2017$30,704  $621  $31,325  
Distributions to Parent(5,800) —  (5,800) 
Net Income—  4,841  4,841  
Balance December 31, 201724,904  5,462  30,366  
Distributions to Parent—  —  —  
Net Income—  879  879  
Balance December 31, 201824,904  6,341  31,245  
Distributions to Parent(9,000) —  (9,000) 
Net Income—  5,942  5,942  
Balance December 31, 2019$15,904  $12,283  $28,187  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-50


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net Income$5,942  $879  $4,841  
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:  
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net374  701  514  
Other Non-Cash Changes in Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes(694) (239) 86  
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(13,033) (14,315) (14,138) 
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights13,682  13,316  11,862  
Depreciation and Amortization4,397  5,664  5,853  
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:   
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value(2,320,560) (2,365,431) (2,619,130) 
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value2,320,560  2,365,470  2,619,709  
Other Assets(426) (198) 61  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities(2,557) 3,945  (1,478) 
Payable to Investors(21,966) (4,859) (9,513) 
Net Related Party Receivable/Payable2,251  (2,482) 2,371  
Other Liabilities(789) 590  2,247  
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities(12,819) 3,041  3,285  
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:   
Purchase of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value(170,326) (177,101) (194,887) 
Principal Payment of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value165,481  175,117  192,054  
Maturities of Short Term Investments—  —  1,280  
Purchases of Property and Equipment(6,374) (3,261) (5,092) 
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(11,219) (5,245) (6,645) 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:   
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes, at Fair Value171,138  176,830  194,391  
Payments of Notes, at Fair Value(167,420) (175,760) (191,828) 
Cash Distributions to Parent(9,000) —  (5,800) 
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities(5,282) 1,070  (3,237) 
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents(29,320) (1,134) (6,597) 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period147,181  148,315  154,912  
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period$117,861  $147,181  $148,315  
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:   
Cash Paid for Interest$39,229  $41,098  $43,776  
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net246  1,101  225  
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets
Cash and Cash Equivalents$7,462  $11,163  $8,223  
Restricted Cash110,399  136,018  140,092  
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$117,861  $147,181  $148,315  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-51


Prosper Funding LLC
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Business
Prosper Funding LLC was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) as its sole equity member. Except as the context otherwise requires, as used in these Notes to consolidated financial statements of Prosper Funding LLC, “PFL”, ”Prosper Funding” and the “Company” refer to Prosper Funding LLC and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a Delaware limited liability company, and Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis.
Prosper Funding did not have any items of other comprehensive income (loss) during any of the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Prosper Funding was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans and issue Notes through the marketplace. Although Prosper Funding is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper Funding has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. Prosper Funding’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. Prosper Funding seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct entity from PMI.
Since February 1, 2013, all Notes issued and sold through the marketplace are issued, sold and serviced by Prosper Funding. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the "Loan Trailing Fee") paid toPMI manages the operation of the marketplace, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the performancesubmission of each loan sold to Prosper Funding. These agreements are effective as of August 1, 2016. TheBorrower Loan Trailing Fee is dependent on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments madeapplications by potential borrowers, of the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by Prosper Funding, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interest in the performance of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by Prosper Funding to WebBank over the term of the respective loans and is a function of the principal and interest payments made by borrowers of such loans. In the event that principal and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, Prosper Funding is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to Prosper Funding is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination of such loan within Other Liabilities and recorded as a reduction of Transaction Fees, net. Any changes in the fair value of this liability are recorded in Change in Fair Value of


related Borrower Loans Loans Held for Saleby WebBank and Notes, Net on the statementsfunding of operations. The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue primarily results from fees, net interest earned and gains on the sale of borrower loans. Fees consist of related party administrative fees and servicing fees paid by investors. We also have other smaller sources of revenue reported as other revenue, which includes fees charged in relation to securitizations by outside investors.
Administration Agreement License Fees
Prosper Funding primarily generates revenues through license fees it earns through an Administration Agreement with PMI. The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by Prosper Funding to PMI that entitles PMI to use the platform for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and note servicing and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding. The license fees are based on the number of listings that are posted to the platform.
Service Fees
Investors who purchase Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel typically pay Prosper Funding a servicing fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper Funding for the costs incurred in servicing the related loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper Funding records servicing fees paid by Borrower Loan investors as a component of operating revenue when received.
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans
Prosper Funding recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it is retained for the servicing ofsuch Borrower Loans by WebBank. Additionally, Prosper Funding recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. Gains or losses on sales of Borrower Loans that are recognized at the time of sale are determined by the difference between the net sales proceeds, fair value of any servicing rights retained and the carrying value of the Borrower Loans sold.
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes
Prosper Funding recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and interest expense on the corresponding Notes using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper Funding believes it to be collectable.
Administration Fee Expense - Related Party
Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the marketplace on behalf of Prosper Funding. Accordingly, each month,As a result Prosper Funding is requiredearns significant revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, PMI.
A borrower who wishes to pay PMI an administration fee that is based on PMI’s (a) finance and legal personnel costs, (b) number of Borrower Loans originatedobtain a loan through the marketplace (c) servicing fees collectedmust post a loan listing on the marketplace. Prosper Funding allocates listings to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from Prosper Funding, the payments of which are dependent on Prosper Funding’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from Prosper Funding.
All loans requested and obtained through the marketplace are unsecured obligations of individual borrowers with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of December 31, 2019. All loans made through the marketplace are funded by or on behalfWebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank. After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to Prosper Funding, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan. WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.
Prosper Funding’s marketplace is designed to allow investors to invest in Borrower Loans in a transparent marketplace, with the aim of allowing both investors and borrowers to benefit financially as well as socially. Prosper Funding believes marketplace lending represents a new model of consumer lending, where individuals and institutions can earn the interest spread of a traditional consumer lender but must also assume the credit risk of a traditional consumer lender.
As of December 31, 2019, Prosper Funding’s marketplace was open to investors in 30 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2019, Prosper Funding’s marketplace was open to borrowers in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Currently, the marketplace does not operate internationally.


F-52


2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
Prosper Funding’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Prosper Funding and (d) nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalfits wholly-owned subsidiary PAH. All intercompany balances and transactions between Prosper Funding and PAH have been eliminated in consolidation. Prosper Funding’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of Prosper Funding. In addition, under a second Administration Agreement between PMIFunding’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and PAH, a wholly owned subsidiaryassumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, valuation of servicing rights, valuation of loan trailing fee liability, repurchase obligations, and contingent liabilities. Prosper Funding PAH is required to pay PMI an annual fee, for PMI being the administrator of PAH’s operations.
Other Expense
Other expense, net includes contract termination costsbases its estimates on historical experience from all Borrower Loans and on various other assumptions that are expectedit believes to be non-recurring and not partreasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from estimates.
Consolidation of restructuring activities.Variable Interest Entities


Comprehensive Income
ThereA variable interest entity (VIE) is no comprehensive income (loss)a legal entity that has either a total equity investment that is insufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Prosper’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other than the net income (loss) disclosedmonetary interests in the consolidated statements of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, 2016-08, 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2016-20, collectively implemented as FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 ("ASC 606") Revenue from Contractsentity, which change with Customers, provides guidance for revenue recognition. The new guidance sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replacesfluctuations in the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed in U.S. GAAP. The underlying principlefair value of the new standardentity’s net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Prosper consolidates a businessVIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Prosper assesses whether or other organization will recognize revenuenot it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an ongoing basis.
Transfers of Financial Assets
Prosper accounts for transfers of financial assets as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to depicthave been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from Prosper, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and Prosper has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold unconditional call options and has not written put options on the transferred assets. In assessing whether control has been surrendered, Prosper considers whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the impact of all arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the transfer, of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions thateven if they were not addressed completely inentered into at the prior accounting guidance.time of transfer. Prosper Funding plans to adopt ASC 606 on a modified retrospective basis in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.  Our implementation efforts to date related to this standard have included identifying revenue streams that are within the scope of this guidance, the evaluation of associated contracts and accounting policies, the evaluation of processes and systems of internal control, and the assessment of disclosure requirements of the standard.  Our scoping analysis indicates that administration fees are included in the scope of the new guidance, while servicing fees andmeasures gain or loss on sale of financial assets as the net proceeds received on the sale of borrower loans remain withinless the scope of ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. We believe that ASC 606 will have little, if any, impact on the timing andcarrying amount of revenue recognition as compared to the current standard and that there will be no material impact upon adoption.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-1, "Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This guidance will be effective for us in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2019, and early adoption is not permitted. Prosper Funding is currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.loans sold. The standard provides guidance for eight targeted changes with respect to how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statements of cash flows, with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. This guidance will be effective for Prosper in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2018, and early adoption is permitted. Prosper Funding is currently evaluating the impacts the adoption of this accounting standard will have on Prosper Funding's cash flows, however we do not expect a material impact.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18)", which requires companies to include amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance will be effective for us in the first quarter of 2018 and early adoption is permitted. Prosper Funding will adopt this standard on January 1, 2018, and we believe the impact will change the presentation of restricted cash within the Statement of Cash Flows.
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consistnet proceeds of the following (in thousands):sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and recourse obligations.
Fair Value Measurement
 December 31,
 2017 2016
Property and equipment: 
  
Internal-use software and web site development costs$19,911
 $16,749
Property and equipment19,911
 16,749
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(11,958) (6,654)
Total property and equipment, net$7,953
 $10,095


DepreciationFair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Prosper uses fair value measurements in its fair value disclosures and amortization expense for 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $5,853 thousand, $4,083 thousand and $3,161 thousand respectively.  Internal-use software and web site development additions of $3.7 million, $5.8 million and $10.5 million were purchased from PMI in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 respectively.  
4.to record Borrower Loans, Loans Held Forfor Sale, Servicing Assets, Notes, and Notes HeldLoan Trailing Fee Liability at Fair Valuefair value on a recurring basis.
The fair value hierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable:
Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs.
When developing fair value measurements, Prosper maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments Prosper must utilize unobservable inputs in determining fair value due to
F-53


the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. In instances where there is limited or no observable market data, fair value measurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, originatedLoans Held for Sale, Notes, and Servicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, Prosper believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, issued through the Note Channel is estimated usingand Servicing Assets should be considered level 3 financial instruments. Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primarymodel to estimate their fair value and key assumptions used to value such Borrower Loansin valuation include default rates and Notes include defaultprepayment rates derived from historical performance market conditions and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on estimates of the perceived credit risk. rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the servicing fee.outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to investors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, the fair value of thea series of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel,Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursed to thesuch Note holders. As a result, the valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing in payments. Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations. The effective interest rate associated with a seriesgroup of Notes will beis less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee.
At December 31, 2017Refer to Note 7 for additional fair value disclosures.
Cash and 2016,Cash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificates of deposit accounts for loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper Funding has on the marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans Notesor disbursed to the investor.
Short Term Investments
Short term investments consists of certificates of deposit with a term greater than three months but less than a year that are held as collateral as required for loan funding and servicing activities.
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale (in thousands) were:and Notes
 Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Aggregate principal balance
   outstanding
$296,668
 $319,143
 $(300,922) $(323,358) $59
 $641
Fair value adjustments(3,663) (3,516) 6,974
 7,122
 (10) (17)
Fair value$293,005
 $315,627
 $(293,948) $(316,236) $49
 $624
At December 31, 2017, outstandingThrough the Note Channel, Prosper Funding purchases Borrower Loans had original maturities between 36from WebBank then issues notes, and 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31%holds the Borrower Loans as a receivable until maturity. The obligation to 32.32%repay a series of notes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans. Borrower loans funded and had various maturity datesnotes issued through December 2022.  At December 31, 2016,the Note Channel are carried on Prosper Funding’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. 
Prosper Funding places Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale had original terms between 36 monthson non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, Prosper stops accruing interest and 60 months, had monthly payments with fixedreverses all accrued but unpaid interest rates rangingas of such date. Additionally, Prosper charges-off Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value of loans 120 days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from 5.32% to 33.04%debt sales in subsequent periods.
Management has elected the fair value option for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and had various maturity dates through 2021.
Within the changeNotes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans Prosper Funding recorded a loss of approximately $1.7 million that is attributable toare largely offset by the changes in the credit risks related to Borrower Loans during the year ending December 31, 2017.
As of December 31, 2017 the Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amount of $3.5 million and a fair value of $1.3 million. As December 31, 2016Notes due to the Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amountborrower payment-dependent design of $3.2 million and athe Notes. Changes in fair value of $1.0 million. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Borrower Loans in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
5. Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper Funding initially records servicing assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values when Prosper Funding sells whole loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The total losses recognized on the sale of the whole loans were $48.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the total gains recognized were $3.6 million and $14.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively.
At December 31, 2017, loans that were sold but for which we retained servicing rights had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.7 billion, original terms of either 36 or 60 months and had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 35.52% and maturity dates through December 2021.  At December 31, 2016, loans that were sold but for which we retained servicing rights had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.4 billion, original terms between 36 and 60 months and had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.32% to 35.52% and Maturity dates through December 2020.
$38.5 million, $38.2 million and $20.4 million of contractually specified servicing fees, late charges and ancillary fees are included on our Statement of Operations in Servicing Fees, Net for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 respectively.  


Fair value
Valuation method  – Discounted cash flow valuation methodology generally consists of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the table presented below within Note 6 are those that Prosper Funding considers significant to the estimated fair values of the servicing assets and liabilities. The following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.  
Market servicing rate – Prosper Funding estimates adequate market servicing rates that would fairly compensate a substitute servicer should one be required, which includes the profit that would be demanded in the marketplace. This rate is stated as a fixed percentage of outstanding principal balance on a per annum basis. Prosper Funding estimated these market servicing rates based on observable market rates for other loan types in the industry and bids from subservicing providers, adjusted for the unique loan attributes that are present in the specific loans that Prosper Funding sells and services and information from a backup service provider.
Discount rate – The discount rate is a rate of return used to discount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, which represents the fair value of the loan servicing rights. We used a range of discount rates for the servicing assets and liabilities based on comparable observed valuations of similar assets and publicly available disclosures related to servicing valuations, with comparability adjustments made to account for differences with Prosper Funding’s servicing assets.
Default Rate – The default rate presented in Note 6 is an annualized, average estimate considering all loan categories (i.e. Prosper ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional default rate curves for each credit grade or loan category. Each point on a particular loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to default per period based on the term and age of the underlying loans. The assumption regarding defaults directly reduces servicing revenues because the amount of servicing revenues received is based on the amount collected each period.
Prepayment Rate – The prepayment rate presented in Note 6 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e. Prosper ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional prepayment rate curves for each credit grade or Borrower Loan category. Each point on a particular Borrower Loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to prepay per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans.  Prepayments reduce servicing revenues as they shorten the period over which we expect to collect fees on the Borrower Loans, which is used to project future servicing revenues.
6. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
For a description of the fair value hierarchy and Prosper Funding’s fair value methodologies, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Prosper Funding did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of level 3 during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a setincluded in “Change in Fair Value of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Prosper Funding estimates the fair value of such Borrower Loans and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologies. The key assumptions used in valuation include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates appliedthat reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.  
F-54


Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper Funding records Servicing Assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when Prosper Funding sells Borrower Loans to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk.
Investments held atunrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value consists of available forServicing Assets and liabilities is recognized in revenue as Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a loan sale investments.  The available for sale investments consistis recorded in Gain (Loss) on Sale of corporate and government bonds.  When available, Prosper Funding uses quoted prices in active markets to measureBorrower Loans while the fair value of securities available for sale. When utilizingthe servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market dataloan servicing rate, is recorded in Servicing Assets or Liabilities. Servicing assets and bid-ask spreads, liabilities are recorded in Servicing Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Prosper Funding uses the price within the bid-ask spread that best represents fair value. When quoted prices do not exist, Prosper Funding uses prices obtained from independent third-party pricing servicesa discounted cash flow model to measureestimate the fair value of investment assets.the loan Servicing Assets or Liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that Prosper Funding generally obtains prices from at least two independent pricing sources for assets recorded at fair value. Prosper Funding's primary independent pricing service provides prices basedearns on observable trades and discounted cash flows that incorporate observable information, such as yields for similar types of securities (a benchmark interest rate plus observable spreads) and weighted-average maturity for the


same or similar securities. Prosper Funding compares the prices obtained from its primary independent pricing service to the prices obtained from the additional independent pricing services to determine if the price obtained from the primary independent pricing service is reasonable. Prosper Funding does not adjust the prices received from independent third-party pricing services unless such prices are inconsistent with the definition of fair value and result in a material difference in the recorded amounts.
The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands):
December 31, 2017
Level 1
Inputs
 
Level 2
Inputs
 
Level 3
Inputs
 Fair Value
Assets 
  
  
  
Borrower Loans$
 $
 $293,005
 $293,005
Servicing Assets
 
 14,598
 $14,598
Loans Held for Sale
 
 49
 49
Total Assets
 
 307,652
 307,652
Liabilities 
  
  
  
Notes$
 $
 $293,948
 $293,948
Servicing Liabilities
 
 59
 59
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
 
 2,595
 2,595
Total Liabilities$
 $
 $296,602
 $296,602
December 31, 2016
Level 1
Inputs
 
Level 2
Inputs
 
Level 3
Inputs
 Fair Value
Assets 
  
  
  
Borrower Loans$
 $
 $315,627
 $315,627
Servicing Assets
 
 12,461
 12,461
Loans Held for Sale
 
 624
 624
Total Assets
 
 328,712
 328,712
Liabilities 
  
  
  
Notes$
 $
 $316,236
 $316,236
Servicing Liabilities
 
 198
 198
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
 
 665
 665
Total Liabilities
 
 317,099
 317,099
As Prosper Funding’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes,estimated market Servicing Assets, Servicing LiabilitiesFees to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and Loan Trailing Fee Liability do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosper Funding uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.
Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper Funding’s level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2017:
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes:


Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2017December 31, 2016
Discount rate4.0% - 14.4%4.0% - 15.9%
Default rate2.0% - 15.4%1.7% - 14.9%
Servicing Assets and Liabilities:
  Range
Unobservable Input December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Discount rate 15% - 25%
 15% - 25%
Default rate 1.5% - 16.1%
 1.5% - 15.2%
Prepayment rate 13.5% - 30.2%
 13.6% - 26.6%
Market servicing rate (1)
 0.625% 0.625%
(1) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient funds fees was assumed to be 7 basis points and 7 basis points for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 69.5 basis points and 69.5 basis points respectively.
Loan Trailing Fee Liability:
Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2017December 31, 2016
Discount rate15% - 25%15% - 25%
Default rate1.5% - 16.1%1.5% - 15.2%
Prepayment rate13.5% - 30.2%13.6% - 26.6%
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. As demonstrated in the following table, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and because thecurrent principal balances of the Borrower Loans approximated the principal balances of the Notes.Loans.  
The following tables present additional information about level 3 Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): 
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
  Borrower Loans Notes 
Loans
Held for
Sale
 Total
Balance at January 1, 2017 $315,627
 $(316,236) $624
 $15
Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 194,887
 (194,391) 2,619,130
 2,619,626
Principal repayments (188,199) 191,828
 (89) 3,540
Borrower loans sold to third parties (3,855) 
 (2,619,620) (2,623,475)
Other changes 97
 (180) (3) (86)
Change in fair value (25,552) 25,031
 7
 (514)
Balance at December 31, 2017 $293,005
 $(293,948) $49
 $(894)


Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
  Borrower Loans Notes 
Loans
Held for
Sale
 Total
Balance at January 1, 2016 $297,273
 $(297,405) $32
 $(100)
Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 217,582
 (217,767) 1,979,952
 1,979,767
Principal repayments (171,195) 173,958
 (447) 2,316
Borrower loans sold to third parties (2,515) 
 (1,978,905) (1,981,420)
Other changes 416
 (591) (1) (176)
Change in fair value (25,934) 25,569
 (7) (372)
Balance at December 31, 2016 $315,627
 $(316,236) $624
 $15
The following table presents additional information about level 3 servicing assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
 
Servicing
Assets
 
Servicing
Liabilities
Fair Value at January 1, 2016$13,605
 $484
Additions9,833
 9
Less: Changes in fair value(10,977) (295)
Balance at December 31, 2016$12,461
 $198
Additions14,138
 
Less: Changes in fair value(12,001) (139)
Fair Value at December 31, 2017$14,598
 $59
The following table presents additional information about level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
Balance at January 1, 2016$
Issuances647
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(21)
Change in fair value39
Balance at December 31, 2016$665
Issuances2,631
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(956)
Change in fair value255
Balance at December 31, 2017$2,595
Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity
Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 2017 for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes originated through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):


 Borrower Loans / Loans Held for Sale Notes 
Fair value at December 31, 2017$293,054
 $293,948
 
Discount rate assumption:7.15%*7.15%*
Resulting fair value from: 
  
 
100 basis point increase$290,116
 $290,948
 
200 basis point increase287,206
 288,024
 
Resulting fair value from: 
  
 
100 basis point decrease$296,169
 $297,028
 
200 basis point decrease299,319
 300,192
 
     
Default rate assumption:13.52%*13.52%*
Resulting fair value from: 
  
 
100 basis point increase$289,386
 $290,202
 
200 basis point increase285,792
 286,581
 
Resulting fair value from: 
  
 
100 basis point decrease$296,868
 $297,742
 
200 basis point decrease300,679
 301,584
 
* Represents weighted average assumptions considering all credit grades.
The following table presents the estimated impact on Prosper Funding’s estimated fair value of servicing assets and liabilities, calculated using different market servicing rates, prepayment rates and different default rates as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands, except percentages).
 
Servicing
Assets
 
Servicing
Liabilities
Fair value at December 31, 2017$14,598
 $59
Weighted average market servicing rate assumptions0.625% 0.625%
Resulting fair value from: 
  
Servicing rate increase to 0.65%13,670
 65
Servicing rate decrease to 0.60%15,525
 53
    
Weighted average prepayment assumptions19.80% 19.80%
Resulting fair value from: 
  
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate14,414
 59
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate14,784
 60
    
Weighted average default assumptions13.00% 13.00%
Resulting fair value from: 
  
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate14,403
 59
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate14,796
 59
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects.
7. Income Taxes


Prosper Funding incurred no income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Prosper Funding is a US disregarded entity and the loss is included in the return of its parent, PMI. Since PMI is in a loss position, not currently subject to income taxes, and has fully reserved its deferred tax asset, the net effective tax rate for Prosper Funding is 0%.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of its operations, Prosper Funding becomes involved in various legal actions. Prosper Funding maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. Prosper Funding does not believe it is probable that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any such matters will have a material effect on Prosper Funding's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Operating Commitments
Prosper has entered into an agreement with WebBank, under which all Borrower Loans originated through the marketplace are made by WebBank under its bank charter. Pursuant to the agreement, the marketing fee that Prosper receives in connection with the origination of each loan is partially reduced by an amount (the “Designated Amount”) calculated as a percentage of the principal amount of such loan based on the aggregate principal amount of loans originated for the applicable month.  To the extent the aggregate Designated Amount for all loans originated during any month is less than $143,500, Prosper is required to pay WebBank an amount equal to such deficiency.  Accordingly, the minimum fee for the year ended December 31, 2018 is $1.7 million. The minimum fee is $0.9 million in 2019. Additionally, under the agreement with WebBank, Prosper is required to maintain a minimum net liquidity of $15 million at all times during the term of the agreement. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. Violation of this covenant can result in termination of the contract with WebBank. At December 31, 2017 the Company was in compliance with the covenant.
Loan Purchase Commitments
Prosper Funding has entered into anUnder the terms of Prosper's agreement with WebBank, Prosper is committed to purchase $29.3$18.6 million of Borrower Loans that WebBank originated during the during the last two business days of the year ended December 31, 2017 and the first business day of the quarter ending March 31, 2018. Prosper will purchase these Borrower Loans within the first three business days of the quarter ended March 31, 2018.2019.
Repurchase and Indemnification ContingencyObligation
Under the terms of the loan purchase agreements between Prosper and investors that participate in the Whole Loan Channel, Prosper may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Borrower Loan from an investor. Generally, these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding protocols or a violation of the applicable federal, state or local lending laws. Prosper recognizes a liability at fair value for the repurchase obligation when the Borrower Loans are sold. The fair value of the repurchase obligation is estimated based on historical experience. Repurchased Borrower Loans associated with violations of federal, state or local lending laws or
F-44


verifiable identity theft are written off at the time of repurchase. The maximum potential amount of future payments associated under the repurchase obligation is the outstanding balances of the Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan channels, which at December 31, 2019 is $3.1 billion. Prosper has accrued $0.4 million and $0.9 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to this obligation.      
Regulatory Contingencies
Prosper accrues for contingencies when a loss from such contingencies is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss is probable and if it is possible to quantify the amount of the estimated loss, Prosper reviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on at least a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If Prosper determines that an unfavorable outcome is not probable or that the amount of a loss cannot be reasonably estimated, Prosper does not accrue for a potential litigation loss. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and Prosper can estimate a range of outcomes, an amount is recorded which management considers to be the best estimate within the range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if management cannot quantify the amount of the estimated loss, then the low end of the range of the potential losses is recorded.
Securities Law Compliance
In 2017, Prosper paid the fourth and final annual installment of $3.0 million in a settlement of a class action lawsuit that was agreed to in 2013.
SEC Inquiry
In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors. Prosper was advised by the SEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. On April 19, 2019, the SEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million was paid in full in April 2019.
West Virginia Matter
In January 2018, the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and practices of PMI and PFL that the Attorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to which Prosper responded with such information as was requested by the Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, Prosper received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that, without in any way admitting that any of its prior practices were in violation of the Consumer Act, Prosper agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. Prosper is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.

We cannot predict the outcome of the matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been made.

No loans have been originated through the Prosper platform to West Virginians since June 2016.

20. Related Parties
Since Prosper’s inception, it has engaged in various transactions with its directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of its voting securities, and with immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders. Prosper believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to Prosper than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
F-45


Prosper’s executive officers, directors who are not executive officers and certain affiliates participate in its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes. The aggregate amount of the Notes purchased and the income earned by parties deemed to be affiliates and related parties of Prosper as of are summarized below (in thousands):
Aggregate PurchasesInterest Earned
 2019201820192018
Executive officers and management$23  $29  $ $ 
Directors464  421  56  45  
$487  $450  $61  $47  

The balance of Notes held by officers, directors who are not executive officers and certain affiliates are as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
 20192018
Executive officers and management$35  $32  
Directors682  569  
$717  $601  


21. Postretirement Benefit Plans
Prosper has a 401(k) plan that covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Prosper’s contributions to the plan are discretionary. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Prosper contributed $2.3 million, $2.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, to the 401(k) plan.

22. Significant Concentrations  
Prosper is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, asset managers, and investment funds to provide the funds to allow WebBank to originate Borrower Loans that the third party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2019, the largest party purchased a total of 9.4% of those loans. This compares to 43.7% for the largest party for the year ended December 31, 2018. Further, a significant portion of our business is dependent on funding through the Whole Loan Channel, for which 94% and 94% of Borrower Loans were originated through the Whole Loan Channel in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  
Prosper receives all of its transaction fee revenue from WebBank. Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank for our services in facilitating originations of Borrower Loans issued by WebBank. The rate of the transaction fee for each individual Borrower Loan is based on the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan. No individual borrower or investor accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net revenue for any of the periods presented.    

23. Segments
Our chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has a single reporting and operating segment.

24. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, other than as recorded or disclosed within these consolidated financial statements and related notes, the Company has determined no additional subsequent events were required to be recognized or disclosed.
F-46


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Prosper Funding LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Funding LLC and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, member’s equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Emphasis of a Matter
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company earns significant amounts of revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, CA
March 20, 2020
We have served as the Company's Auditor since 2014


F-47


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
December 31,
20192018
Assets  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$7,462  $11,163  
Restricted Cash110,399  136,018  
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value245,137  263,522  
Property and Equipment, Net7,549  6,426  
Servicing Assets14,888  15,550  
Other Assets749  323  
Total Assets$386,184  $433,002  
Liabilities and Member's Equity  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$2,133  $4,690  
Payable to Related Party2,679  1,283  
Payable to Investors105,287  127,253  
Notes, at Fair Value244,171  264,003  
Other Liabilities3,727  4,528  
Total Liabilities357,997  401,757  
Member's Equity  
Member's Equity15,904  24,904  
Retained Earnings12,283  6,341  
Total Member's Equity28,187  31,245  
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity$386,184  $433,002  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-48


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Revenues  
Operating Revenues  
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$49,818  $105,709  $101,500  
Servicing Fees, Net26,368  27,943  25,963  
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(5,058) (58,027) (48,691) 
Other Revenues155  270  170  
Total Operating Revenues71,283  75,895  78,942  
Interest Income on Borrower Loans41,146  43,569  47,208  
Interest Expense on Notes(38,492) (40,656) (43,954) 
     Net Interest Income2,654  2,913  3,254  
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(375) (701) (514) 
Total Net Revenues73,562  78,107  81,682  
Expenses   
Administration Fee – Related Party62,575  70,491  70,359  
Servicing5,012  6,140  6,103  
General and Administrative33  597  379  
Total Expenses67,620  77,228  76,841  
Net Income$5,942  $879  $4,841  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-49


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity
(in thousands)
Member’s
Equity
Retained EarningsTotal
Balance January 1, 2017$30,704  $621  $31,325  
Distributions to Parent(5,800) —  (5,800) 
Net Income—  4,841  4,841  
Balance December 31, 201724,904  5,462  30,366  
Distributions to Parent—  —  —  
Net Income—  879  879  
Balance December 31, 201824,904  6,341  31,245  
Distributions to Parent(9,000) —  (9,000) 
Net Income—  5,942  5,942  
Balance December 31, 2019$15,904  $12,283  $28,187  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-50


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
 201920182017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net Income$5,942  $879  $4,841  
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:  
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net374  701  514  
Other Non-Cash Changes in Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes(694) (239) 86  
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(13,033) (14,315) (14,138) 
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights13,682  13,316  11,862  
Depreciation and Amortization4,397  5,664  5,853  
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:   
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value(2,320,560) (2,365,431) (2,619,130) 
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value2,320,560  2,365,470  2,619,709  
Other Assets(426) (198) 61  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities(2,557) 3,945  (1,478) 
Payable to Investors(21,966) (4,859) (9,513) 
Net Related Party Receivable/Payable2,251  (2,482) 2,371  
Other Liabilities(789) 590  2,247  
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities(12,819) 3,041  3,285  
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:   
Purchase of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value(170,326) (177,101) (194,887) 
Principal Payment of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value165,481  175,117  192,054  
Maturities of Short Term Investments—  —  1,280  
Purchases of Property and Equipment(6,374) (3,261) (5,092) 
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(11,219) (5,245) (6,645) 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:   
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes, at Fair Value171,138  176,830  194,391  
Payments of Notes, at Fair Value(167,420) (175,760) (191,828) 
Cash Distributions to Parent(9,000) —  (5,800) 
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities(5,282) 1,070  (3,237) 
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents(29,320) (1,134) (6,597) 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period147,181  148,315  154,912  
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period$117,861  $147,181  $148,315  
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:   
Cash Paid for Interest$39,229  $41,098  $43,776  
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net246  1,101  225  
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets
Cash and Cash Equivalents$7,462  $11,163  $8,223  
Restricted Cash110,399  136,018  140,092  
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$117,861  $147,181  $148,315  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-51


Prosper Funding LLC
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Business
Prosper Funding LLC was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) as its sole equity member. Except as the context otherwise requires, as used in these Notes to consolidated financial statements of Prosper Funding LLC, “PFL”, ”Prosper Funding” and the “Company” refer to Prosper Funding LLC and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a Delaware limited liability company, and Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis.
Prosper Funding did not have any items of other comprehensive income (loss) during any of the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Prosper Funding was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans and issue Notes through the marketplace. Although Prosper Funding is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper Funding has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. Prosper Funding’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. Prosper Funding seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct entity from PMI.
Since February 1, 2013, all Notes issued and sold through the marketplace are issued, sold and serviced by Prosper Funding. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the marketplace, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the submission of Borrower Loan applications by potential borrowers, the origination of related Borrower Loans by WebBank and the funding of such Borrower Loans by WebBank. Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the marketplace on behalf of Prosper Funding. As a result Prosper Funding earns significant revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, PMI.
A borrower who wishes to obtain a loan through the marketplace must post a loan listing on the marketplace. Prosper Funding allocates listings to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from Prosper Funding, the payments of which are dependent on Prosper Funding’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from Prosper Funding.
All loans requested and obtained through the marketplace are unsecured obligations of individual borrowers with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of December 31, 2019. All loans made through the marketplace are funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank. After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to Prosper Funding, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan. WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.
Prosper Funding’s marketplace is designed to allow investors to invest in Borrower Loans in a transparent marketplace, with the aim of allowing both investors and borrowers to benefit financially as well as socially. Prosper Funding believes marketplace lending represents a new model of consumer lending, where individuals and institutions can earn the interest spread of a traditional consumer lender but must also assume the credit risk of a traditional consumer lender.
As of December 31, 2019, Prosper Funding’s marketplace was open to investors in 30 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2019, Prosper Funding’s marketplace was open to borrowers in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Currently, the marketplace does not operate internationally.


F-52


2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
Prosper Funding’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Prosper Funding and its wholly-owned subsidiary PAH. All intercompany balances and transactions between Prosper Funding and PAH have been eliminated in consolidation. Prosper Funding’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of Prosper Funding’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, valuation of servicing rights, valuation of loan trailing fee liability, repurchase obligations, and contingent liabilities. Prosper Funding bases its estimates on historical experience from all Borrower Loans and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from estimates.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
A variable interest entity (VIE) is a legal entity that has either a total equity investment that is insufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Prosper’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in the entity, which change with fluctuations in the fair value of the entity’s net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Prosper consolidates a VIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Prosper assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an ongoing basis.
Transfers of Financial Assets
Prosper accounts for transfers of financial assets as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from Prosper, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and Prosper has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold unconditional call options and has not written put options on the transferred assets. In assessing whether control has been surrendered, Prosper considers whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the impact of all arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the transfer, even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer. Prosper measures gain or loss on sale of financial assets as the net proceeds received on the sale less the carrying amount of the loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and recourse obligations.
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Prosper uses fair value measurements in its fair value disclosures and to record Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Servicing Assets, Notes, and Loan Trailing Fee Liability at fair value on a recurring basis.
The fair value hierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable:
Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs.
When developing fair value measurements, Prosper maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments Prosper must utilize unobservable inputs in determining fair value due to
F-53


the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. In instances where there is limited or no observable market data, fair value measurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Servicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, Prosper believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Servicing Assets should be considered level 3 financial instruments. Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate their fair value and key assumptions used in valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to investors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, the fair value of a series of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursed to such Note holders. As a result, the valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing in payments. Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations. The effective interest rate associated with a group of Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee.
Refer to Note 7 for additional fair value disclosures.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificates of deposit accounts for loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper Funding has on the marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.
Short Term Investments
Short term investments consists of certificates of deposit with a term greater than three months but less than a year that are held as collateral as required for loan funding and servicing activities.
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes
Through the Note Channel, Prosper Funding purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues notes, and holds the Borrower Loans as a receivable until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of notes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans. Borrower loans funded and notes issued through the Note Channel are carried on Prosper Funding’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. 
Prosper Funding places Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, Prosper stops accruing interest and reverses all accrued but unpaid interest as of such date. Additionally, Prosper charges-off Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value of loans 120 days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from debt sales in subsequent periods.
Management has elected the fair value option for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Notes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans are largely offset by the changes in fair value of Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent design of the Notes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are included in “Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Prosper Funding estimates the fair value of such Borrower Loans and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologies. The key assumptions used in valuation include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.  
F-54


Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper Funding records Servicing Assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when Prosper Funding sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of Servicing Assets and liabilities is recognized in revenue as Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing rate, is recorded in Servicing Assets or Liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in Servicing Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Prosper Funding uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan Servicing Assets or Liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that Prosper Funding earns on the Borrower Loans, estimated market Servicing Fees to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and the current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.  
Software and Website Development
Software and website development represents the software and website development costs that PMI transferred to Prosper Funding. Prosper Funding does not develop any of its own software or its website. Software and website development re included in Property and Equipment, Net and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives which is generally one to five years. Prosper Funding evaluates its software assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software and website development assets.
Payable to Investors
Payable to Investors primarily represents the Company's obligation to investors related to cash held in an account for the benefit of investors and payments-in-process received from borrowers.
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
On July 1, 2016, Prosper signed a series of agreements with WebBank which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the “Loan Trailing Fee”) paid to WebBank in connection with the performance of each loan sold to Prosper. These agreements were effective as of August 1, 2016. The Loan Trailing Fee is dependent on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers of the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by Prosper, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interest in the performance of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by Prosper to WebBank over the term of the respective loans and is a function of the principal and interest payments made by borrowers of such loans. In the event that principal and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, Prosper is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to Prosper is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination of such loan within Other Liabilities and recorded as a reduction of “Transaction Fees, net”. Any changes in the fair value of this liability are recorded in “Servicing Fees, Net” on the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue primarily results from fees, net interest earned and gains on the sale of Borrower Loans. Fees consist of related party administrative fees and Servicing Fees paid by investors. The Company also has other smaller sources of revenue reported as Other Revenues including fees charged in relation to securitizations by outside investors.
Administration Agreement License Fees
Prosper Funding primarily generates revenues through license fees it earns through an Administration Agreement with PMI. The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by Prosper Funding to PMI that entitles PMI to use the platform for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and Note servicing and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding. The license fees are based on the number of listings that are posted to the platform.
F-55


Service Fees
Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper through the Whole Loan Channel typically pay Prosper a servicing fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received.
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans
PFL recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. PFL measures gain or loss on sale of Borrower Loans as the net proceeds received on the sale less the carrying amount of the Borrower Loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and repurchase obligations.
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes
Prosper Funding recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and interest expense on the corresponding Notes using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper Funding believes it to be collectable.
Administration Fee Expense - Related Party
Pursuant to the Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages the marketplace on behalf of Prosper Funding. Accordingly each month, Prosper Funding is required to pay PMI an administration fee that is based on PMI’s (a) finance and legal personnel costs, (b) number of Borrower Loans originated through the Marketplace, (c) Servicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding. In addition, under a second Administration Agreement between PMI and PAH, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prosper Funding, PAH is required to pay PMI an annual fee for PMI being the administrator of PAH’s operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Adopted in the Current Period
No accounting standards were adopted in the current period for Prosper Funding LLC.
Accounting Standards Issued, to be Adopted in Future Periods
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for level 3 fair value measurements. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, but entities are permitted to early adopt either the entire standard or only the provisions that eliminate or modify the requirements. The guidance only affects disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements and will not affect Prosper’s Consolidated Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of Operations.

3. Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
 December 31,
 20192018
Internal-use software and web site development costs$24,930  $22,505  
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization(17,381) (16,079) 
$7,549  $6,426  
Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $4.4 million, $5.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively. Internal-use software and web site development additions of $5.5 million, $4.1 million and $3.7 million were purchased from PMI in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.  

F-56


4. Borrower Loans and Notes, at Fair Value
The fair value of Borrower Loans and Notes issued through the Note Channel is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics. The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the payments, if any, received on the corresponding borrower loan, net of the servicing fee. As such, the fair value of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently disbursed to the note holders. The effective interest rate associated with a series of notes will be less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding borrower loan due to the servicing fee.
Borrower Loans
The fair values of Borrower Loans were as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
 20192018
Aggregate principal balance outstanding$248,702  $269,093  
Fair value adjustments(3,565) (5,571) 
$245,137  $263,522  

At December 31, 2019, Borrower Loans had original maturities of either 36 or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92% and had various maturity dates through December 2024. At December 31, 2018, Borrower Loans had original maturities of either 36 or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92% and had various maturity dates through December 2023.
Within the change in fair value of Borrower Loans, Prosper Funding recorded a loss of approximately $2.9 million and $0.8 million that is attributable to changes in the credit risks related to Borrower Loans during the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. 
As of December 31, 2019, Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $2.6 million and a fair value of $0.8 million. As of December 31, 2018, Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $2.5 million and a fair value of $1.1 million. Prosper Funding places loans on non-accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Borrower Loans in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Notes
The fair values of Notes were as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
20192018
Aggregate principal balance outstanding$250,281  $272,430  
Fair value adjustments(6,110) (8,427) 
$244,171  $264,003  



5. Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper Funding accounts for Servicing Assets and Liabilities at their estimated fair values with changes in fair values recorded in Servicing Fees, Net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The initial asset or liability is recognized when Prosper Funding sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers through the Whole Loan Channel and the servicing rights are retained. The total recognized gains and losses on the sale of such Borrower Loans were a $5.1 million loss, a $58.0 million loss and a $48.7 million loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
At December 31, 2019, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper Funding retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.7 billion, original terms of either 36 or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed
F-57


interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92% and various maturity dates through December 2024. At December 31, 2018, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper Funding retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.7 billion, original terms of either 36 or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 35.52% and various maturity dates through December 2023.
$43.4 million, $44.0 million and $38.5 million of contractually specified Servicing Fees, late charges and ancillary fees are included in our Statement of Operations in Servicing Fees, Net for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Fair Value Valuation Method
Prosper Funding uses a discounted cash flow valuation methodology generally consisting of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the table within Note 7 are those that Prosper Funding considers significant to the estimated fair values of the Level 3 Servicing Assets and Liabilities. The following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.  
Market Servicing Rate
Prosper Funding estimates adequate market servicing rates that would fairly compensate a substitute servicer should one be required, which includes the profit that would be demanded in the marketplace. This rate is stated as a fixed percentage of outstanding principal balance on a per annum basis. Prosper Funding estimates these market servicing rates based on observable market rates for other loan types in the industry and bids from sub-servicing providers, adjusted for the unique loan attributes that are present in the specific loans that Prosper Funding sells and services and information from a backup service providers.
Discount Rate
The discount rate is a rate of return used to discount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, which represents the fair value of the loan servicing rights. Management used a range of discount rates for the Servicing Assets and liabilities based on comparable observed valuations of similar assets and publicly available disclosures related to servicing valuations, with comparability adjustments made to account for differences with Prosper Funding’s Servicing Assets.
Default Rate
The default rate presented in Note 7 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e., risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional default rate curves for each credit grade or borrower loan category. Each point on a particular borrower loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to default per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. The assumption regarding defaults directly reduces servicing revenues because the amount of servicing revenues received is based on the amount collected each period.
Prepayment Rate
The prepayment rate presented in Note 7 is an annualized, average estimate considering all borrower loan categories (i.e., risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional prepayment rate curves for each credit grade or borrower loan category. Each point on a particular borrower loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to prepay per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. Prepayments reduce servicing revenues as they shorten the period over which Prosper Funding expects to collect fees on the Borrower Loans, which is used to project future servicing revenues.

6. Income Taxes
Prosper Funding incurred 0 income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Prosper Funding is a U.S. disregarded entity and its income and loss are included in the income tax reporting of its parent, Prosper Marketplace, Inc. Since Prosper Marketplace, Inc. is in a loss position, is not currently subject to income taxes, and has fully reserved against its deferred tax asset, the net effective tax rate for Prosper Funding is 0%.

F-58


7. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
Prosper Funding has elected to record certain financial instruments at fair value on the balance sheet. Prosper Funding classifies Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes as financial instruments and assesses their fair value each on a quarterly basis for financial statement presentation purposes. Gains and losses on these financial instruments are shown separately on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. As demonstrated in the following table, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and because the principal balances of the Borrower Loans approximated the principal balances of the Notes.
For a description of the fair value hierarchy and Prosper Funding’s fair value methodologies, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Prosper Funding did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of Level 3 during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The fair value of the Borrower Loans and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands):
December 31, 2019
Level 1
Inputs
Level 2
Inputs
Level 3
Inputs
Fair Value
Assets
Borrower Loans$—  $—  $245,137  $245,137  
Servicing Assets—  —  14,888  14,888  
—  —  260,025  260,025  
Liabilities    
Notes$—  $—  $244,171  $244,171  
Servicing Liabilities—  —  —  —  
Loan Trailing Fee Liability—  —  2,997  2,997  
$—  $—  $247,168  $247,168  

December 31, 2018
Level 1
Inputs
Level 2
Inputs
Level 3
Inputs
Fair Value
Assets
Borrower Loans$—  $—  $263,522  $263,522  
Servicing Assets—  —  15,550  15,550  
—  —  279,072  279,072  
Liabilities    
Notes$—  $—  $264,003  $264,003  
Servicing Liabilities—  —  12  12  
Loan Trailing Fee Liability—  —  3,118  3,118  
$—  $—  $267,133  $267,133  

As Prosper Funding’s Borrower Loans, Notes and loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosper Funding uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.
F-59


Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following tables present quantitative information about the range of significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper Funding’s Level 3 fair value measurements:
 December 31,
20192018
Borrower Loans and Notes
Discount rate4.4 %—  12.1 %4.7 %—  13.8 %
Default rate2.4 %—  17.7 %2.0 %—  15.8 %

 December 31,
20192018
Servicing Assets
Discount rate15.0 %—  25.0 %15.0 %—  25.0 %
Default rate1.7 %—  18.8 %1.6 %—  16.7 %
Prepayment rate16.5 %—  28.1 %15.5 %—  25.1 %
Market servicing rate (1)
0.625 %0.625 %
(1) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 6 basis points and 8 basis points, respectively, for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 68.5 basis points and 70.5 basis points respectively.

December 31,

20192018
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
Discount rate15.0 %—  25.0 %15.0 %—  25.0 %
Default rate1.7 %—  18.8 %1.6 %—  16.7 %
Prepayment rate16.5 %—  28.1 %15.5 %—  25.1��%



















F-60


Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Assets and Liabilities on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents additional information about Level 3 Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans, and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 
AssetsLiabilities
Loans Held
for Sale
Borrower
Loans
NotesTotal
Fair value at January 1, 2018$49  $293,005  $(293,948) $(894) 
     Originations2,365,431  177,101  (176,830) 2,365,702  
     Principal repayments(20) (171,427) 175,760  4,313  
     Borrower Loans sold to third parties(2,365,450) (3,690) —  (2,369,140) 
     Other changes—  (202) 441  239  
     Change in fair value(10) (31,265) 30,574  (701) 
Fair value at December 31, 2018$—  $263,522  (264,003) $(481) 
     Originations2,320,560  170,326  (171,138) 2,319,748  
     Principal repayments—  (162,082) 167,420  5,338  
     Borrower Loans sold to third parties(2,320,560) (3,399) —  (2,323,959) 
     Other changes—  (45) 739  694  
     Change in fair value—  (23,185) 22,811  (374) 
Fair value at December 31, 2019$—  $245,137  $(244,171) $966  

The following table presents additional information about Level 3 Servicing Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 
Servicing Assets 
Fair value at January 1, 2018$14,598 
     Additions14,315 
     Loss in fair value(13,363)
Fair value at December 31, 2018$15,550 
     Additions13,032 
     Loss in fair value(13,694)
Fair value at December 31, 2019$14,888 

The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
Loan Trailing Fee Liability 
Fair Value at January 1, 2018$2,595 
     Issuances2,524 
     Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(2,494)
     Loss in fair value493 
Fair Value at December 31, 2018$3,118 
     Issuances2,254 
     Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(2,660)
     Loss in fair value285 
Fair Value at December 31, 2019$2,997 

Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity
Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Borrower Loans and Notes. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2019 for Borrower Loans and Notes funded through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):
F-61


Borrower Loans Notes
Fair Value at December 31, 2019$245,137  $244,171  
     Weighted-average discount rate6.43 %6.43 %
     Weighted-average default rate13.68 %13.68 %
Fair value resulting from:   
100 basis point increase in discount rate$242,888   $241,927  
200 basis point increase in discount rate240,691   239,737  
Fair value resulting from:   
100 basis point decrease in discount rate$247,442   $246,471  
200 basis point decrease in discount rate249,805   248,828  
Fair value resulting from:   
100 basis point increase in default rate$241,930   $240,958  
200 basis point increase in default rate238,807   237,831  
Fair value resulting from:   
100 basis point decrease in default rate$248,453   $247,489  
200 basis point decrease in default rate251,777   250,817  

Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Servicing Assets. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2019 for Servicing Assets is presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):
Servicing
Assets
Fair Value at December 31, 2019$14,888 
     Market servicing rate0.625 %
     Weighted-average prepayment rate20.99 %
     Weighted-average default rate12.67 %
Fair value resulting from:
Market servicing rate increase to 0.65%13,966 
Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60%15,811 
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate14,583 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate15,197 
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate14,618 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate15,165 

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects.

8. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of its operations, Prosper Funding becomes involved in various legal actions. Prosper Funding maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. The Company does not believe it is probable that the ultimate
F-62


liability, if any, arising out of any such matters will have a material effect on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Operating Commitments
Prosper Funding has entered into an agreement with WebBank, under which all Borrower Loans originated through the marketplace are made under WebBank's bank charter. On February 1, 2019, Prosper Funding and WebBank extended the terms of their agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, the marketing fee that Prosper Funding receives in connection with the origination of each loan is partially reduced by an amount (the “Designated Amount”) calculated as a percentage of the principal amount of such loan based on the aggregate principal amount of loans originated for the applicable month. To the extent the aggregate Designated Amount for all loans originated during any month is less than $143.5 thousand, Prosper Funding is required to pay WebBank an amount equal to such deficiency. Accordingly, the minimum fee is $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $0.1 million for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Additionally, under the agreement with WebBank, Prosper Funding is required to maintain minimum net liquidity of $15 million at all times during the term of the agreement. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. Violation of this covenant can result in termination of the contract with WebBank. At December 31, 2019 the Company was in compliance with the covenant.
Loan Purchase Commitments
Under the terms of Prosper Funding's agreement with WebBank, Prosper Funding is committed to purchase $18.6 million of Borrower Loans that WebBank originated during the last two business days of the year ended December 31, 2019.
Repurchase Obligation
Under the terms of the loan purchase agreements between Prosper and investors that participate in the Whole Loan Channel, Prosper Funding may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Borrower Loan from an investor. Generally, these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding protocols or a violation of the applicable federal, state or local lending laws. Prosper Funding recognizes a liability at fair value for the repurchase obligation when the Borrower Loans are sold. The fair value of the indemnification and repurchase obligation is estimated based on historical experience and the initial fair value is insignificant. Prosper Funding recognizes a liability for the repurchase and indemnification obligation when the Borrower Loans are issued. Indemnified or repurchasedexperience. Repurchased Borrower Loans associated with violations of federal, state or local lending laws or verifiable identity theft are written off at the time of repurchase or at the time an indemnification payment is made.repurchase. The maximum potential amount of future payments associated under thisthe repurchase obligation is the outstanding balances of the Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan Channel,channels, which at December 31, 2017 is2019 was $3.7 billion. Prosper Funding had accrued $0.8$0.4 million and $0.6$0.9 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 respectively in regard to this obligation.
Regulatory Contingencies
Prosper Funding accrues for contingencies when a loss from such contingencies is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss is probable and if it is possible to quantify the amount of the estimated loss, Prosper Funding reviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on at least a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If Prosper Funding determines that an unfavorable outcome is not probable or that the amount of a loss cannot be reasonably estimated, Prosper Funding does not accrue for a potential litigation loss. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and Prosper Funding can estimate a range of outcomes, PFL records the amount management considers to be the best estimate within the range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if management cannot quantify the amount of the estimated loss, then PFL records the low end of the range of those potential losses.
SEC Inquiry
In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors. Prosper was advised by the SEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. On April 19, 2019, the SEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million was paid in full in April 2019.
West Virginia Matter
In January 2018, the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and practices of PMI and PFL that the Attorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to which Prosper responded with such information as was requested by the Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, Prosper received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that,
F-63


without in any way admitting that any of its prior practices were in violation of the Consumer Act, Prosper agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. Prosper is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.

We cannot predict the outcome of the matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been made.

No loans have been originated through the Prosper platform to West Virginians since June 2016.

9. Related Parties
Since inception, Prosper Funding has engaged in various transactions with its directors, and executive officers, sole member, and immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and sole member. Prosper Funding believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to Prosper Funding than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Prosper Funding’s executive officers and directors who are not executive officers and certain affiliates participate on Prosper Funding’s lending platformin its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes.Notes and Borrower Loans. The aggregate amount of the Notesnotes and Borrower Loans purchased and the income earned by parties deemed to be affiliates and related parties of Prosper Funding as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 are summarized below (in thousands):

Aggregate PurchasesInterest Earned
 2019201820192018
Executive officers and management$23  $29  $ $ 
Directors—  —  —  —  
$23  $29  $ $ 


The balance of Notes held by officers and directors who are not executives officers are as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
 20192018
Executive officers and management$35  $32  
Directors—  —  
$35  $32  

  Aggregate Amount of Interest Earned on
Related Party Notes Purchased Notes
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Executive officers and management $29
 $1,065
 $109
 $225
Directors 
 
 
 
Total $29
 $1,065
 $109
 $225
Related Party Notes balance as of December 31,
  2017 2016
Executive officers and management $38
 $1,620
Directors 
 
Total $38
 $1,620

10. Significant Concentrations
Prosper Funding is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, asset managers and investment funds to provide the funding to allow WebBank to originate loans that the third party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the largest party purchased a total of 70%9.4% of those loans. This compares to 20%, 16% and 9%43.7% for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Further, a significant portion of our business is dependent on funding through the Whole Loan Channel. 93%94.0% and 90%94.0% of Borrower Loans were originated through the Whole Loan Channel in the years ending December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.  


11. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, other than as recorded or disclosed within these consolidated financial statements and related notes, the Company has determined no additional subsequent events were required to be recognized or disclosed.
F-64


EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
Description
Asset Transfer Agreement, dated January 22, 2013, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 23, 2015 by and among Prosper Marketplace, Inc., American HealthCare Lending, LLC (“AHL”), Prosper Healthcare Lending, LLC and Shaun Sorensen, solely in his capacity as agent for AHL’s members and option holders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of PMI’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 27, 2015)
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 23, 2015, by and among Prosper Marketplace, Inc., BillGuard, Inc., Beach Merger Sub, Inc. and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, solely in its capacity as the Stockholders’ Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of PMI’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 15, 2015)
Fifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Prosper Funding LLC, dated October 21, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-179941), filed on October 23, 2013 by PFL and PMI)
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PMI, as further amended on October 15, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 13, 2017)14, 2018)
PFL Certificate of Formation of Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed April 23, 2012 by PFL)
Bylaws of PMI,Prosper Marketplace, Inc., dated March 22, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-147019), filed October 30, 2007)
Form of PFL Borrower Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit A in Exhibit 4.5)


Form of PMI Borrower Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit A in Exhibit 4.4)




Exhibit
Number4.3
Description
Supplemental Indenture, dated January 22, 2013, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc., Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
Indenture, dated June 15, 2009, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-147019), filed on June 26, 2009)
Amended and Restated Indenture, dated January 22, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 10, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 14, 2013)
Form of PFL Borrower Registration Agreement (2)
Form of PFL Investor Registration Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 20, 2017)(2)


Form of PMI Borrower Registration Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-182599), filed on November 19, 2012)
Asset Sale Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017) (1)


First Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated October 7, 2016, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 22, 2019) (1)
Second Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated March 27, 2017, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 22, 2019) (1)
Third Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated February 1, 2019, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 24, 2019)
93


Exhibit
Number
Description
Marketing Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017) (1)


First Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated October 7, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 22, 2019) (1)
Second Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated November 17, 2017, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 22, 2019) (1)
Third Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated February 1, 2019, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 24, 2019) (1)
Administration Agreement, effective as of February 1, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
Amendment No. 1 to Administration Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2014, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2014)
Amendment No. 2 to Administration Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2015, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 6, 2015)
Amendment No. 3 to Administration Agreement, between PFL and PMI, dated as of November 8, 2016 and made effective as of July 1, 2016, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 20, 2017)


Amendment No. 4 to Administration Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2018, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 26, 2018)
Amendment No. 5 to Administration Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2018 and made effective as of October 1, 2018, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 29, 2019)
Services and Indemnity Agreement, dated March 1, 2012, betweenamong Global Securitization Services, LLC, Kevin Burns, Bernard Angelo, Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to PFL and PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Nos. 333-179941 and 333-179941-01), filed on November 21, 2012) (3)
Second Amended and Restated Loan Sale Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, betweenamong WebBank, Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013) (1)
Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan Sale Agreement, dated October 27, 2015, between PMI, PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 9, 2015)
Second Amended and Restated Loan Account Program Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013) (1)
Stand By Loan Purchase Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013) (1)
Amended and Restated Loan SaleStand By Purchase Agreement, dated September 14, 2010, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of PMI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2010) (1)
Amended and Restated Loan Account Program Agreement, dated September 14, 2010,July 1, 2016, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI’s QuarterlyPMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 10-Q,8-K, filed on November 12, 2010)July 8, 2016) (1)
First Amendment to Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated February 1, 2019, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 24, 2019) (1)
94


Exhibit
Number
Description
Director Indemnification Agreement, dated January 15, 2013, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Patrick (Pat) Grady (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 31, 2014) (3)


Exhibit
Number10.25
Description
Form of Indemnification Agreement for PMI’s directors (other than Patrick Grady), officers and key employees (3)
Form of PMI interim Borrower Registration Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to PMI's Registration Statement10.21 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form S-1 (File No. 333-182599)10-K, filed on January 7, 2013)March 18, 2016) (3)
Form of PMI interim Lender Registration Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to PMI's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-182599) filed on January 7, 2013)
Back-Up Servicing Agreement (Note Channel), dated as of February 24, 2017, among PFL, PMI,Prosper Funding LLC, Prosper Marketplace, Inc., and First Associates Loan Servicing, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 15, 2017) (1)


Amended and Restated Services and Indemnity Agreement, dated May 30, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC, Prosper Marketplace, Inc., Global SecurititizationSecuritization Services, LLC, Bernard J. Angelo and David V. DeAngelis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 5, 2013) (3)
Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan Sale Agreement, dated October 27, 2015, between PMI, PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2015)
Amended and Restated Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 29, 2014) (3)
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 12, 2015) (3)
Amendment No. 1 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 13, 2016) (3)
Amendment No. 2 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on August 15, 2016) (3)

Amendment No. 3 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 26, 2018) (3)
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 18, 2016) (3)
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 18, 2016) (3)
Asset Sale Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between WebBank and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017) (1)
Marketing Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017) (1)
Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 8, 2016) (1)
Warrant Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2017, among PMI, PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP, and, for certain limited purposes, New Residential Investment Corp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 15, 2017) (1)


Amendment No. 4 to Administration Agreement between PFL and PMI, dated as of January 25, 2018 (2)
Subsidiaries of Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (2)
Subsidiaries of Prosper Funding LLC (2)
Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm (2)
Certification of ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer of PMI Pursuantpursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)


Exhibit
Number31.2
Description
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of PMI pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
Certification of ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer of PFL Pursuantpursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification of TreasurerPrincipal Financial Officer of PFL Pursuantpursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of PMI pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to PMI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019 (2)


(1)Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 406 of the Securities Act.
(2)Filed herewith.
(3)Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.  
95


(1) Certain portions of this exhibit have been, as applicable, (i) omitted and filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 406 of the Securities Act or (ii) marked by brackets and omitted because the information is (a) not material and (b) would be competitively harmful if disclosed.
(2) Filed herewith.
(3) Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.  
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 23th20th day of March 2018.
2020.
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
By:/s/ David Kimball
David Kimball
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer);
DirectorChairman of the Board
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Usama Ashraf and Sachin Adarkar,Julie Hwang, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


NameTitleDate
NameTitleDate
/s/ David KimballChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer); Director
Chairman of the Board
March 23, 201820, 2020
David Kimball
/s/ Usama AshrafChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)March 23, 201820, 2020
Usama Ashraf
/s/ *DirectorMarch 20, 2020
Claire A. HuangDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Claire A. Huang
*DirectorMarch 20, 2020
/s/ Rajeev V. DateDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Rajeev V. Date
*DirectorMarch 20, 2020
/s/ Patrick W. GradyDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Patrick W. Grady
*DirectorMarch 20, 2020
/s/ David R. Golob DirectorMarch 23, 2018
David R. Golob
/s/ Nigel W. MorrisDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Nigel W. Morris
*Director
/s/ Mason D. Haupt  DirectorMarch 23, 201820, 2020
Mason D. Haupt  


*By: /s/ Julie HwangMarch 20, 2020
Julie Hwang

Attorney-in-Fact

96



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 23th20th day of March 2018.
2020.
PROSPER FUNDING LLC
PROSPER FUNDING LLC
By:/s/ David Kimball
David Kimball
Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer); Director
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Usama Ashraf and Sachin Adarkar,Julie Hwang, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameTitle
NameTitle
/s/ David KimballChief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer); DirectorMarch 23, 201820, 2020
David Kimball
/s/ Usama AshrafChief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financing and AccountingFinancial Officer); DirectorMarch 23, 201820, 2020
Usama Ashraf


/s/ Bernard J. AngeloDirectorMarch 23, 201820, 2020
Bernard J. Angelo
/s/ David V. DeAngelisDirectorMarch 23, 201820, 2020
David V. DeAngelis



S-2
97