UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______
Commission
File Number
Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter,
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization,
Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code
and Registrant's Telephone Number (Including Area Code)
I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
Number
prosper-20211231_g1.jpg
333-147019 333-179941-01 333-204880 333-225797-01
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
a Delaware corporation
221 Main Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 593-5400
73-1733867
333-179941
333-204880-01
333-225797
PROSPER FUNDING LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
221 Main Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 593-5479

593-5400
45-4526070
Commission File NumberExact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code
Registrant's Telephone Number (Including Area Code)
I.R.S. Employer Identification Number
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
RegistrantSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Title of Each ClassTrading SymbolName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.NoneNoneNone
Prosper Funding LLCNoneNone
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
RegistrantTitle of Each ClassName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.NoneNoneNone
Prosper Funding LLCNoneNoneNone
Indicate by check mark if each registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes ¨ No ý
   Prosper Funding LLC
Yes ¨ No ý
Yes ¨ No ý
Yes ¨ No ý
Indicate by check mark if each registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes¨ ¨ No ý
Yes ¨No ý
   Prosper Funding LLC
Yes ¨ No ý
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No ¨
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes ý No ¨
   Prosper Funding LLC
Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes ý No ¨
Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K (applicable to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. only). ¨
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes ý No ¨
   Prosper Funding LLC
Yes ý No ¨

1




Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging“emerging growth company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
Accelerated
Filer
Accelerated
Filer
Non-Accelerated
Non-accelerated Filer
Smaller
Reporting
Company
Emerging Growth Company
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.¨¨xý¨¨
Prosper Funding LLC¨¨
ý

x
¨

¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if each registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.¨
   Prosper Funding LLC¨
¨Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.¨
   Prosper Funding LLC¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
   Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
  Yes ☐Yes ¨ No ý
Yes ¨No ý
   Prosper Funding LLC
  Yes No ý
Prosper Funding LLC meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.
RegistrantAggregate Market Value of Voting and Non-Voting Common Equity Held by Non-Affiliates of the Registrant at June 30, 2018Number of Shares of Common Stock of the Registrant Outstanding at
June 30, 2021March 18, 201921, 2022
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.(a)
70,491,295
72,398,859
($.010.01 par value)
Prosper Funding LLC(a)(b)None
(a) Not applicable
(b) All voting and non-voting common equity is owned by Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
aNot applicable.
bAll voting and non-voting common equity is owned by Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
THIS COMBINED FORM 10-K IS SEPARATELY FILED BY PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC. AND PROSPER FUNDING LLC. INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN RELATING TO ANY INDIVIDUAL REGISTRANT IS FILED BY SUCH REGISTRANT ON ITS OWN BEHALF. EACH REGISTRANT MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS TO INFORMATION RELATING TO THE OTHER REGISTRANT.

2



TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM Page
PART I 
ITEM 1
ITEM 1A
ITEM 1B
ITEM 2
ITEM 3
ITEM 4
PART II 
ITEM 5
ITEM 6
ITEM 7
ITEM 7A
ITEM 8
ITEM 9
ITEM 9A
ITEM 9B
PART III 
ITEM 10
ITEM 11
ITEM 12
ITEM 13
ITEM 14
PART IV 
ITEM 15

XBRL Content

3




Except as the context requires otherwise, as used herein, “Registrants” refers to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”), a Delaware corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Prosper Funding LLC (“PFL”), a Delaware limited liability company; “we,” “us,” “our,” “Prosper,” and the “Company” refer to PMI and its wholly owned subsidiaries, PFL, BillGuard, Inc. (“BillGuard”), a Delaware corporation, Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”), a Delaware statutory trust, and Prosper Healthcare Lending LLC (“PHL”), a Delaware limited liability company, Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”), a Delaware statutory trust, Prosper Warehouse II Trust (“PWIIT”), a Delaware statutory trust, Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-1 (“PMIT 2019-1”, deconsolidated on September 27, 2021), a Delaware statutory trust, Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-2 (“PMIT 2019-2”, deconsolidated on September 27, 2021), a Delaware statutory trust and Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-4 (“PMIT 2019-4”, deconsolidated on September 27, 2021), a Delaware statutory trust, and Prosper Grantor Trust (“PGT”), a Delaware statutory trust, on a consolidated basis; and “Prosper Funding” refers to PFL and its wholly owned subsidiaries,subsidiary, Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis. Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a Delaware limited liability company andwas dissolved on November 28, 2018. As a result, references to Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis.Funding do not include PAH for periods subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2018. In addition, the unsecured, consumerpersonal loans originated through our marketplace are referred to as “Borrower Loans,” and the borrower payment dependent notes issued through our marketplace, whether issued by PMI or PFL, are referred to as “Notes.” Investors currently invest in Borrower Loans through two channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on the payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows accredited and institutional investors to purchase Borrower Loans in their entirety directly from PFL. The Notes available to Note Channel investors are distinguishable from notes held by certain third party investors pursuant to Prosper’s securitization transactions, which are referred to herein as “Notes Issued by Securitization Trust.” Finally, although historically we havethe Company has referred to investors as “lender members,” we callPFL calls them “investors” herein to avoid confusion since WebBank is the lender for Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace.  All share and per share numbers presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been adjusted to reflect a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016.
The following filings are available for download free of charge at www.prosper.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such filings are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports. Further, a copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is located at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our SEC filings are also available to the public at the SEC’s Internet site at www.sec.gov. The information posted on our website and blog is not incorporated herein by reference and is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts, and can generally be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “continue” or similar expressions. These statements may appear throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the sections titled “Business,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements inherently involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in these statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, PMI or PFL expresses an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of our respective managements, is expressed in good faith, and is believed to have a reasonable basis. Nevertheless, wemanagement can give no assurances that any of the events anticipated by these forward-looking statements will occur or, if any of them does occur, what impact they will have on Prosper or Prosper Funding’s results of operations and financial condition.
There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements, including, among other things:
the performance of the Notes, which, in addition to being speculative investments, are special, limited obligations that are not guaranteed or insured;
PFL’s ability to make payments on the Notes, including in the event that borrowers fail to make payments on the corresponding Borrower Loans;
our ability to attract potential borrowers and investors to our personal loan marketplace;
the reliability of the information about borrowers that is supplied by borrowers including actions by some borrowers to defraud investors;
our ability to service the Borrower Loans, and our ability or the ability of a third party debt collector to pursue collection against any borrower, including in the event of fraud or identity theft;
credit risks posed by the credit worthiness of borrowers and the effectiveness of our credit rating systems;
4


potential efforts by state regulators or litigants to impose liability that could affect PFL’s (or any subsequent assignee’s) ability to continue to charge to borrowers the interest rates that they agreed to pay at origination of their loans;
the impact of future economic conditions on the performance of the Notes and the loss rates for the Notes;
4




the performance of our recently-launched unsecured credit card (“Credit Card”) product and secured digital Home Equity Line of Credit (“HELOC”) product that was launched in 2019;

our compliance with applicable local, state and federal law, including the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and other laws;
our compliance with applicable regulations and regulatory developments or court decisions affecting our business;
potential efforts by state regulators or litigants to characterize PFL or PMI, rather than WebBank, as the lender of the loans originated through our marketplace;
the application of federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws to borrowers and to PFL and PMI;
the impact of borrower delinquencies, defaults and prepayments on the returns on the Notes;
the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects;
the lack of a public trading market for the Notes and the current lack of any trading platform on which investors can resell the Notes;
the federal income tax treatment of an investment in the Notes and the PMI Management Rights;
our ability to prevent security breaches, disruptions in service, and comparable events that could compromise the personal and confidential information held on our data systems, reduce the attractiveness of the platform or adversely impact our ability to service Borrower Loans; and
the other risks discussed under the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  
There may also be other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. You should carefully read the factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause PMI or PFL’s actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements included in this report speak only as of the date hereof and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. PMI and PFL undertake no obligation to update or revise such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

5




PART I
ItemITEM 1. BusinessBUSINESS
Overview
ProsperOur vision is to transform lives by providing affordable financial solutions through the simplest and most trusted platform. We currently offer access to three lending products, each of which supports our vision: (i) unsecured personal loans through a personal loan marketplace which connects eligible consumer borrowers with individual and institutional investors, (ii) an unsecured Credit Card product available to eligible borrowers, and (iii) a secured HELOC product available to eligible homeowners.

Personal Loan

We are a pioneer of online marketplace lending.peer-to-peer lending in the U.S. and first launched our personal loan lending product in 2006. Our goal is to enable borrowers to access credit at affordable rates and provide investors with attractive risk-adjusted rates of return. Ourpersonal loan marketplace facilitated $2.8$1.9 billion in Borrower Loan originations during 20182021 and $14.0$20.1 billion in Borrower Loan originations since it first launched in 2006.launch.
We believe our online marketplacebusiness model has key advantages relative to traditional bank lending, includingbanks, including: (i) an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects qualified supply and demand of capital, (ii) online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience, and (iii) datause of advanced technology and technology driven automationartificial intelligence to deliver simple, fast, personalized, and transparent solutions that increases efficiency, and improvescan improve consumers’ financial health as they move across the borrower and investor experience.credit spectrum. We do not operate physical branches or incur expenses related to that infrastructure; instead, we use data and technology to drive automation and efficiency in our operations.infrastructure like traditional banks or consumer finance institutions. As part of operating our marketplace, we verify the identity of borrowers and assess borrowers’ credit risk profile using a combination of public and proprietary data. Our proprietary technology automates several loan origination and servicing functions, including the borrower application process, data gathering, underwriting, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection.
WeTo consumer borrowers, we believe that we offer many consumers access togenerally better pricing, on average, than the pricing that theythose loan borrowers would pay on outstanding credit card balances or unsecured installment loans from a traditional bank or finance company. We also believe that we offer faster decisions and loan originations, and greater transparency, resulting in a better customer experience than that provided by traditional consumer finance institutions.
lender. To individual and institutional investors, we offer an asset class (personal loans) that we believe has attractive risk adjusted returns, transparency, and lowlower duration risk.
Our personal loan marketplace offers fixed rate, fully amortizing, unsecured consumerpersonal loans ranging from $2,000 to $40,000 with no prepayment penalty. Loan terms of three and five years are available, depending in large part upon the ratingProsper Rating assigned to the borrower at issuance and loan amount being sought. All Borrower Loans are originated and funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank organized under the laws of Utah. WebBank retains certain loans, which are not available for investment through the marketplace. After origination, WebBank sells the Borrower Loans to PFL, which either holds them or sells them to accredited institutional investors.
Investors invest in Borrower Loans through two channels – (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on PFL’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows accredited institutional investors to purchase a Borrower Loan in its entirety directly from PFL. PFL continues to own the Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel. Prosper servicesWe service all of the Borrower Loans made through our marketplace.
Credit Card
In December 2021, we launched our Credit Card product in partnership with Coastal Community Bank (“Coastal”), through which eligible consumers are extended unsecured credit through Prosper-branded Credit Cards. Both we and Coastal receive ongoing payments based on sales transacted on Credit Cards and net interest income based on the marketplace.credit performance of receivables allocated to each party under the contract. We also receive annual fees and late fees from some consumers that are issued Credit Cards. Our Credit Card product did not have a material impact on our revenue as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021. Credit Cards are not available on our personal loan marketplace for investment purposes.
HELOC
In March 2019, we launched the HELOC product. Currently, we partner with Spring EQ, LLC (“Spring EQ”) to provide a variety of services, including accepting online applications, counseling and non-counseling services, and verification, technology and processing services. The HELOC product is available through our website in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Vermont, as we are a licensed mortgage broker in each of the
6




foregoing states. The HELOC product did not have a material impact on our revenue as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021. The HELOC product is not available on our personal loan marketplace for investment purposes.
Company Background and History
PMI was incorporated in the state of Delaware on March 22, 2005. PFL was formed as a limited liability company in the state of Delaware on February 17, 2012, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PMI.
PMI developed our personal loan marketplace and, until February 1, 2013, owned the proprietary technology that makes operation of our personal loan marketplace possible. On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred the personal loan marketplace to PFL. PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended (i) to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or similar proceeding, and (ii) to minimize the likelihood that, in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, PFL would be substantively consolidated with PMI and thus have its assets subjected to claims of PMI’s creditors. We believe we have achieved this by imposing through PFL’s organizational documents and covenants in the Amended and Restated Indenture (as defined below in Item 13, "Certain“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence”) certain restrictions on PFL’s activities and certain formalities designed to reinforce PFL’s status as a distinct entity from PMI. In addition, under the Administration Agreement, dated February 1, 2013, between PMI and PFL (as amended to date, the “Administration Agreement”), PMI has agreed, in its dealings with PFL and with third parties, to observe certain “separateness covenants”
6


related to its corporate formalities. PMI has also adopted resolutions limiting its own activities and interactions with PFL in order to further reduce the likelihood that PFL would be substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy.  
PFL has retained PMI, pursuant to the Administration Agreement, to provide certain administrative services relating to our personal loan marketplace. Specifically, the Administration Agreement contains a license granted by PFL to PMI that entitles PMI to use the marketplace for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and Note servicing, and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding. The license is terminable in whole or in part upon the failure by PMI to pay PFL the licensing fee, or upon PMI’s termination as the provider of some or all of the aforementioned services. See Item 13, "Certain“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.—Agreements with PFL” for more information.
How our Personal Loan Marketplace Works
Our personal loan marketplace is an online marketplace that matches individuals who wish to obtain unsecured consumerpersonal loans with individuals and institutions who are willing to commit funds to those loans. A borrower who wishes to obtain a loan through our marketplace must apply and, if accepted, post a loan listing to our marketplace. Each time we post a group of listings on our personal loan marketplace, we determine the relative proportions of such listings that will be allocated to the Note Channel and the Whole Loan Channel, respectively, based on our estimate of the relative overall demand in each channel. We then use a random allocation methodology to allocate individual listings between the two channels based on those proportions. If a listing receives enough investor commitments, WebBank will originate the Borrower Loan requested and then sell it to PFL.  
Borrowers
Any natural person at least 18 years of age who is a U.S. resident in a state where loans through our marketplace are available with a U.S. bank account and a social security number may apply to become a borrower. All potential borrowers are subject to anti-fraud, anti-terrorism and identity verification processes and a potential borrower cannot obtain a loan without passing those processes.
When a borrower requests a loan, we first evaluate whether the borrower meets the underwriting criteria required by WebBank. The underwriting criteria apply to all loans originated through our marketplace and may not be changed without WebBank's consent. For the Note Channel, all borrowers who request a loan are subject to the following minimum eligibility criteria: (1) have at least a 640 creditFICO08 score, (2) have fewer than five credit bureau inquiries (after excluding duplicate inquiries) within the last 6 months, (3) have an annual income greater than $0, (4) have a debt-to-income ratio of no more than 50%, (5) have at least three open trades reported on their credit report, and (6) have not filed for bankruptcy within the last 12 months. Borrowers
We also allow two borrowers to apply together as joint applicants for a co-borrower loan. Each borrower applicant is held jointly and severally liable for the obligations under the loan. In the case of co-borrower loans, the primary (or “specified”) borrower must satisfy the above credit criteria (except the debt-to-income ratio for joint loans is calculated using the combined debt-to-income ratio of the primary and secondary borrowers without duplication of combined debt). The secondary borrower
7




must also satisfy certain additional credit criteria, including a minimum FICO08 score of at least 600, at least one open trade reported on the secondary borrower’s credit report, and no bankruptcy filings within the last 12 months.
In addition, a borrower may have up to two loans through Prosper outstanding at one time, provided that (1) the first loan is current, (2) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of both loans does not exceed the then-current maximum allowable loan amount for loans (currently $40,000), (3) the borrower’s first loan has been outstanding for at least 6 months, and (3)(4) the borrower complies with the prior-borrower constraints above. below. For co-borrower loans, the foregoing additional requirements will apply if either the primary or secondary borrower has a currently outstanding loan.
If a borrower has previously obtained a Borrower Loan through our personal loan marketplace, then in addition to the foregoing requirements (as applicable), the borrower must also (1) have no prior charge-offs on Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace, and (2) have never been more than 15 days delinquent on any Borrower Loan obtained through our marketplace within 12 months of his or her application.
From time to time, we have, with WebBank’s consent, tested new products that include features which are outside the standard eligibility criteria discussed above. These products are available on a limited basis, exclusively through our Whole Loan Channel and did not have a material impact on our business or our financial statements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.Channel.    
Investors
Investors are individuals and institutions that have the opportunity to buy Notes or Borrower Loans.Loans after registering on our personal loan marketplace. However, investors do not have the ability to invest in the Credit Card and HELOC products on our personal loan marketplace. An individual investor must be a natural person at least 18 years of age and a U.S. resident, must provide his or her social security number, and may be required to provide his or her state driver’s license or state identification card number. An institutional investor must provide its taxpayer identification number and entity formation documentation. All potential investors are subject to anti-fraud, anti-terrorism and identity verification processes and a potential investor cannot invest in Notes or Borrower Loans without passing those processes.  
At the time an individual investor registers to participate in the Note Channel, such investor must satisfy any minimum financial suitability standards established for the Note Channel by the state in which the investor resides. Investors who participate in the Note Channel must enter into an investor registration agreement, which agreement governs all sales of Notes to such investors.
7


Only investors thatwho are approved by us are eligible to participate in the Whole Loan Channel. At a minimum, to participate in the Whole Loan Channel, an investor must meet the definition of an “accredited investor” set forth in Regulation D under the Securities Act. Investors who participate in the Whole Loan Channel must enter into loan purchase and loan servicing agreements with us.
Individual investors can also create a Prosper IRA account to invest on our marketplace using tax-deferred funds from an individual retirement account (“IRA”). Prosper IRA accounts are not maintained on our personal loan marketplace. Rather, Prosper IRA accounts are managed by third-party custodians who direct Prosper to make deposits and withdrawals to the individual’s Prosper IRA account on behalf of the investor and/or their beneficiaries and who ensure IRA accounts remain compliant with applicable U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) regulations. Investors have the ability to select their third-party custodian or utilize a Prosper preferred third-party custodian partner for account management purposes. 
Relationship with WebBank
WebBank is an FDIC-insured, Utah-chartered industrial bank that originates all Borrower Loans made through our personal loan marketplace. WebBank and PMI are parties to an agreement under which PMI manages the operations of our marketplace that relate to the submission of loan applications by borrowers and the making of related Borrower Loans by WebBank in exchange for a fee. WebBank makes each Borrower Loan with its own funds. A joint WebBank-Prosper Credit Policy, which can be changed only with WebBank’s approval, constitutes the policy Prosperwe must follow in reviewing, approving and administering Borrower Loans made by WebBank through the marketplace. WebBank, PMI and PFL are parties to a Loan Sale Agreement, under which WebBank sells and assigns the promissory notes evidencing the Borrower Loans to PFL. As consideration for WebBank's agreement to sell and assign the promissory notes, PFL pays WebBank the purchase price of the promissory notes, as well as a monthly fee, which is partially tied to the terms and performance of the loans. PMI receives payments from WebBank as compensation for the activities it undertakes on WebBank's behalf.
Risk Management
Each loan listing is assigned a Prosper Rating, which is a letter grade that indicates the expected level of risk associated with the listing.listing, which we refer to as a Prosper Rating. Each letter gradeProsper Rating corresponds to an estimated average annualized loss rate range. The Prosper Rating associated with a loan listing reflects the loss expectations for that listing as of the time the rating is given. This means
8




that otherwise similar borrowers may have different Prosper Ratings at different points in time as the Prosper Rating is updated to incorporate more recent information.
The estimated average annualized loss rate for each loan listing is based primarily on the historical performance of Borrower Loans with similar characteristics and is primarily determined by twothe following scores: (i) aone or more custom Prosper Score,scores (“Prosper Score”), as may be supplemented by additional proprietary scoring models, and (ii) a credit score obtained from a credit reporting agency. The customA Prosper Score is also updated periodically to include new information that is predictive of borrower risk as such information becomes available or as the evidence supporting a particular datumvariable becomes strong enough to merit its inclusion in the customa Prosper Score.
The Prosper Score predicts the probability of a Borrower Loan going “bad,” where “bad” is defined as going more than 60 days past due within twelve months of the application date. To create thea Prosper Score, we have developed and refined a custom, Artificial Intelligence (“AI”)-driven risk modelmodels using our historical data as well as a data archive from a consumer credit bureau. We built the modelProsper Score models on our borrower population, and included as variables information provided directly by the borrowers as well as included ininformation from their credit reports and other data sources, so that the modelmodels would incorporate behavior that is unique to that population. In addition to thea Prosper Score, another major element used to determine the Prosper Rating for a loan listing is a credit score from a consumer reporting agency. We currently use either or both of TransUnion’s FICO08 score.score and VantageScore. We obtain a borrower’s credit score at the time the loan listing is created, unless we already have a credit score on file that is not more than thirty days old.
Sale of Notes and Borrower Loans
If an investor successfully bids on a loan listing, the principal amount of the loan will be set aside in the investor’s account and may not be used for other bids. In the event a listing does not result in a loan being originated, the funds are made available for bidding by the investor.
For loan listings allocated to the Note Channel, a bid on a listing is an investor’s commitment to purchase a Note from PFL. PFL generally issues and sells a series of Notes for each Borrower Loan that is originated through the Note Channel. The Notes are sold to the investors who successfully bid on the corresponding loan listing in the principal amounts of their respective bids. Each series of Notes is dependent for payment on PFL’s receipt of payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan. PFL uses the proceeds of each series of Notes to purchase the corresponding Borrower Loan from WebBank on the second business day after WebBank has originated the Borrower Loan. Each Note comes attached with an inseparable PMI Management Right issued by PMI. Each PMI Management Right constitutes an "investment contract," a concept under federal securities law that refers to an arrangement where investors invest money in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits, primarily from the efforts of others.
8


For listings allocated to the Whole Loan Channel, a bid on a listing is an investor’s commitment to purchase the Borrower Loan from PFL after origination by WebBank and sale to PFL. On the second business day after WebBank has originated the Borrower Loan, PFL purchases the Borrower Loan from WebBank and re-sells the Borrower Loan that same day to the corresponding investor. PFL records the investor as the owner of the Borrower Loan.
Loan Servicing and Collection
We are responsible for servicing the Borrower Loans made through our personal loan marketplace. We will pay each Note holder principal and interest on the Note in an amount equal to each such Note’s pro-rata portion of the principal and interest payments, if any, which we receive on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee. We will also pay Note holders their pro ratapro-rata portion of any other amounts we receive on the corresponding Borrower Loans, including late fees and prepayments, subject to our servicing fee; provided, that we will not pay Note holders any non-sufficient funds fees we receive for failed borrower payments. In addition, the funds available for payment on the Notes will be reduced by the amount of any attorneys’ fees or collection fees we, a third-party servicer or a collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts related to the corresponding Borrower Loan. NoWe will have no further obligation to make payments will be made on any Note after its final maturity date.
We will pay each investor thatwho has purchased a Borrower Loan through the Whole Loan Channel principal and interest on the Borrower Loan purchased in an amount equal to the principal and interest payments, if any, that we receive, net of our servicing fee. We will also pay these investors any other amounts we receive on the Borrower Loans, including late fees and prepayments, subject to our servicing fee, provided that we will not pay these investors any non-sufficient funds fees we receive for failed borrower payments or any payment processing fees we may collect. In addition, the funds available for payment on the Borrower Loans will be reduced by the amount of any attorneys' fees or collection fees we, a third-party servicer or a collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts related to the Borrower Loan.
If a Borrower Loan becomes past due, we may collect on it directly or refer it to a third-party collection agency. Our in-house collections department and third-party collection agencies are compensated by keeping a portion of the payments they collect based on a predetermined schedule.  
9




Customers
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding commitments for a large percentage of all listings that result in Borrower Loans originated through our personal loan marketplace. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, the largest party purchased a total of 44%26.7% of those loans.
Industry Background and Trends
According to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as of December 2018,2021, the balance of outstanding consumer credit (excluding mortgages)loans secured by real estate) in the United States totaled $4.0 $4.4 trillion. This amount included $1.0 trillion ofof revolving consumer credit, which manyprimarily credit card, and $3.4 trillion of non-revolving loans. A portion of the revolving balances are also refinanced by consumers seek to refinance for aat lower interest rate.rates and fixed terms through personal loans.

The market for consumer lending is competitive and rapidly evolving, and there is an opportunity for the online marketplaceour business model to transform the traditional lending process. We believe our marketplace offers a superior solution for both borrowers and investors.
For borrowers, we believe our marketplace offers the following principal competitive factors: better pricingterms versus other alternatives; a simple, easy and intuitive customer experience; a fast and efficient process; and trust and transparency.
For investors, we believe our marketplace offers the following principal competitive factors: attractive risk adjustedrisk-adjusted returns; low duration risk; diversification from other asset classes; a simple, easy and intuitive customer experience; and trust and transparency.
Competition
We compete for borrowers and investors against other financial products and companies. For borrowers, our competition includes banking institutions, credit unions, credit card issuers, mortgage lenders, and other online consumer finance companies.lending companies, such as LendingClub Corporation, Social Finance Inc., and Upstart Holdings, Inc. For
9


investors in our personal loan product, our competition includes other investment vehicles such as consumer lending funds and asset classes such as equities, bonds and commodities. Our competition for borrowers and investors also includes other online consumer lending companies, such as LendingClub Corporation, Social Finance Inc. and other marketplace lending platforms. We may also face potential competition from new market entrants, or business expansion from established companies, likesuch as Goldman Sachs. These companies may have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their offerings. 
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe the following strengths differentiate us from our competitors and provide us with sustainable competitive advantages:
Leading Online Personal Loan Marketplace. Since inception, our personal loan marketplace has facilitated $14.0$20.1 billion in loan originations, of which $2.8$1.9 billion was for the year-ended December 31, 2018.2021. As our business grows, our brand, reputation and scale strengthens. This allows us to attract top talent, speed up product innovation, launch additional personal finance products, attract market placemarketplace participants and drive down our cost structure, all of which further benefit borrowers and investors.
Robust Network Effect. The attractiveness of our personal loan marketplace increases as the number of participants on our marketplace increases, yielding a classic network effect. Our personal loan marketplace offers consumer borrowers access to affordable credit, and allows individual and institutional investors to invest in an asset class with attractive risk-adjusted returns. The diversity of investors brings scale and breadth of funding to our marketplace and makes credit more affordable. As both sides of the equation grow, the advantages (reduced risk, lower cost) scale accordingly, attracting even more borrowers and investors. The increased participant pool reduces costs and generates more data which we use to improve the effectiveness of our credit decisioning and scoring models. This enhances our aggregate loan performance and builds increased trust in our marketplace, which in turn attracts more borrowers and investors. We believe our strength in the personal loan marketplace will also attract customers to seek out the Credit Card and HELOC products.
Technology Platform. Our technology platform automates key aspects of our operations, including the borrower application process, data gathering, underwriting, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection. This provides a significant time and cost advantage over traditional consumer lending business models and, we believe, enables us to provide a superior user experience to our borrowers and investors. Using our accumulated performance data, we continually invest in incremental improvements in our algorithms thus extending our technological advantage.
10




Proprietary Risk Management Capabilities. We have developed aAI-driven proprietary risk modelmodels based on consumerpersonal loan and credit card performance data, which we believe allows us to accurately assess the credit risk profile of borrowers and which we believe also allows investors to earn attractive risk adjustedrisk-adjusted returns. We leverage the results from our growing data stream to continually refine thisthese AI-driven risk modelmodels and more accurately predict loancredit performance.
Unique Corporate Structure. Our corporate structure was designed to offer our investors extra protection. The organization and operation of PFL and PMI as separate and distinct entities should serve to protect our Note investors in the event of a bankruptcy filing by or against PMI. This organizational structure, along with the federal and state registration process, is expensive and time consuming to undertake, and is not easily duplicated by competitors.
Efficient and Attractive Financial Model. We have multiple revenue streams and an efficient cost model. WeFor personal loans, we generate revenue from transaction fees from our marketplace’s role in matching borrowers with investors to enable loan originations, servicing fees related to Borrower Loans for which we retain the servicing rights, net interest income from Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, credit referral fees and other ancillary revenue sources. Additionally, our technology platform significantly reduces the need for physical infrastructure and therefore allows our business to grow with a lower cost operating model, providing us with significant operating leverage.
10


Sources of Revenues
We have three primary sources of personal loan revenues: transaction fees, servicing fees, and net interest income. Prosper earnsWe earn transaction fees from WebBank by facilitating the origination of Borrower Loans through the marketplace. Prosper earnspersonal loan marketplace, and we earn servicing fees from investors for processing principal and interest payments made by borrowers and passing such payments on to investors and also earnsearn net interest income from Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale. The revenue of the Credit Card and HELOC products was not material as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing efforts are designed to attract individuals and institutions to our marketplace,products, encourage their enrollment and participation as users, and facilitate and enhance their understanding and utilization of the services for borrowing or investing.each product. We employ a wide range of marketing channels to reach potential customers and build our brand and value proposition. These channels include referrals, online marketing, direct mail, partner and affiliate introductions, and email. We are constantly seeking new methods to reach more potential members, while testing and optimizing the end to endend-to-end customer experience.
Origination and Servicing
We have efficient and scalable systems for credit risk assessment, loan underwriting, and servicing. Our risk model takesmodels take borrowers’ supplied information and combinescombine that information with public and proprietary data to make real time decisions. Our verification agents use automatedseveral tools to confirm credit eligibility.efficiently verify borrower information. Our personal loan servicing platform calculates a loan’s amortization and processes payments received from borrowers and passes such payments on to investors. In addition, we have a back-up servicing agreement with Vervent, Inc. (“Vervent”) (f/k/a First Associates Loan Servicing, LLC (“First Associates”)LLC), a loan servicing company that is willing and able to assume servicing responsibilities in the event that we are no longer able to service the Borrower Loans and Notes. First AssociatesVervent is a financial services company that has entered into numerous successor loan servicing agreements.
Technology
We have made substantial investment in our customer acquisition capability, customer experience, and credit underwriting, loan servicing and payment systems. Our personal loan marketplace utilizes proprietary software to process electronic cash movements, record book entries and calculate cash balances in users’ funding accounts. Electronic deposits and payments are mostly done via Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) transactions. The technology platform allows us to economically acquire and service Borrower Loans and Notes, and allows WebBank to efficiently originate and fund Borrower Loans.
The system hardware for our personal loan marketplace is located in hosting facilities in Scottsdale, Arizona, and Las Vegas, Nevada.Nevada, The Dalles, Oregon and Council Bluffs, Iowa. We own the hardware deployed in support of our personal loan marketplace. We continuously monitor the performance and availability of our marketplace. The infrastructure is scalable and utilizes standard techniques such as load-balancing and redundancies.
Key aspects of our technology include:
Scalability. Our personal loan marketplace is designed and built as a real-time, highly scalable, multi-tier, redundant system. It incorporates technologies designed to prevent any single point of failure within the data center from taking the entire system offline. This is achieved by utilizing load-balancing technologies at the front end and business layer
11




tiers and clustering technologies in the back-end tiers to allow scaling both horizontally and vertically depending on marketplace utilization. 
11


Data IntegrityIntegrity and SecuritySecurity. We are committed to protecting our users' information and we take the integrity and security of the data provided by them very seriously. To that end, we have established data protection policies which are implemented and enforced using the latest technologies. All sensitive information is transmitted on secure channels using SSL technology, with SSL certificates issued by Symantec or DigiCert. We employ principles of least privilege and layered security to protect stored sensitive information. Sensitive information at rest is encrypted using the industry level encryption technologies with appropriate controls to access the data. We protect the network perimeter using the latest technologies including but not limited to firewall and anti-virus threat management techniques. We use strong multi-factor authentication to protect and monitor remote access. We back up all data securely and would expect to recover operations in a short period of time in the event of a disaster. Logging and monitoring of the systems and security controls enables us to ensure that the controls are functional and that alerts are triggered on security violations.
Fraud DetectionDetection. We employ a combination of proprietary technologies and commercially available licensed technologies and solutions to prevent and detect fraud. These include knowledge-based authentication, behavioral analytics and digital fingerprinting to prevent identity fraud. We use services from third-party vendors for user identification, credit checks and for checking customer names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals and other lists maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). In addition, we use specialized third-party software to augment the identity fraud detection systems. We also have a dedicated team which conducts additional investigations of cases flagged for high fraud risk. Finally, we enable users to report suspicious activity, which we may then evaluate further.
Targeted Risk Assessment. Our AI-driven credit risk models include flags and characteristics which are unique to our platform. We believe this results in a risk assessment that is more targeted and accurate than the traditional lenders, leading to higher approval rates, lower interest rates and highly automated identity and income verification. We are continuing to improve the AI technology embedded within our models to facilitate and improve access to credit and the application experience for borrowers. We have been building and enhancing AI models since 2015 and currently have AI models for underwriting, early payment default, third party fraud, income verification, collections and our direct mail program.
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trade secret, trademark, and other rights, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect our proprietary technology, processes and other intellectual property. We enter into confidentiality and other written agreements with our employees, consultants and service providers, and through these and other written agreements, attempt to control access to and distribution of the software, documentation and other proprietary technology and information. We also utilize a robust multi-layered monitoring program, including third party domain monitoring services, web search engine alerts and our outside counsel, which we leverage to actively enforce our intellectual property rights. Despite these efforts to protect our proprietary rights, third parties may, in an authorized or unauthorized manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain and market or distribute our intellectual property rights or technology or otherwise develop a product with the same functionality. Policing all unauthorized use of intellectual property rights is nearly impossible. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken or will take in the future will prevent misappropriations of our technology or intellectual property rights.
We have registered several trademarks in the United States, forincludingProsper,” “Prosper Healthcare FundingFAAS,” “Prosper.comMake Healthcare Affordable,”Powered by Prosper” and numerous stylized marks, including the Prosper and Prosper Healthcare Funding logos,Lending logos.
We have invested in a research and other trademarks.development program and, as of December 31, 2021, we had two issued patents and six patent applications filed and pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We may file additional patent applications or pursue additional patent protection in the future to the extent we believe it will be beneficial.
EmployeesHuman Capital Resources
Employee Profile
At Prosper, our mission is to advance financial well-being and Contractors
our employees are critical to achieving this mission. We are committed to hiring and developing employees who embody our core values: accountability, collaboration, excellence, curiosity, diversity, simplicity, and integrity. As of December 31, 2018,2021, we employed 415had 384 full-time employees. Theemployees, all of whom were based in the United States. Our employees are split into the following table shows a breakdown by function:four functions: 121 in origination and servicing, 20 in sales and marketing, 101 in general and administrative – research and development, and 142 in general and administrative –
12


Employees
Origination and Servicing160 
Sales and Marketing17 
General and Administrative - Research and Development97 
General and Administrative – Other141 
Total Headcount415 


other. None of our employees are represented by labor unions. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Employee Health & Wellness
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the safety and well-being of our employees and their families has been a top priority as we continue to serve our customers. We transitioned our entire workforce to remote working arrangements and provide a monthly stipend to cover added remote costs. We also keep our employees informed with frequent communications on health and community resources and information along with updates regarding our own response to COVID-19. We continue to monitor and update our practices to remain aligned and ahead of federal, state and local laws, regulations, guidelines and recommendations.
Our employees have access to several programs and benefits related to employee wellness including: traditional life and health (medical, dental, vision) insurance, flexible paid time off, free membership to physical, mental and emotional health resources, and parental leave programs, among others. We have also introduced specific programs and benefits for caregivers during the pandemic including free tutoring for school-aged children. We believe our progressive human resources policies, learning and development, talent acquisition, and community engagement and support activities enable us to attract and retain key personnel.
Employee Recognition and Talent Development
We understand that to attract and retain great people, we must listen to and engage them regularly. We conduct an anonymous, company-wide employee engagement survey twice a year to gauge our progress and identify the areas where we excel and areas for improvement in the employee experience. Following each survey, we identify areas where we would like to focus to support engagement within the company and create action plans to support those initiatives. We have implemented two award programs to recognize and honor our employees who exemplify our values.
Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we require ongoing regulatory and compliance training for our employees. Additionally, we provide a series of leadership training for all people managers. We also offer employees free access to on-demand training on an array of subjects from technical to business management to build the skills and advance their careers as well as opportunities for employees to pursue their passion projects and leadership development in alignment with our values.
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging
Diversity and collaboration are among our company’s core values and we believe our efforts in diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (“DEIB”) fuel our innovation and drive our success. Our goal is to foster a diverse and inclusive workplace where our employees feel that their identities and experiences are represented, embraced and celebrated. We are also committed to our efforts to increase diversity through our hiring practices by using gender-neutral job postings and recruiting policies that promote diverse candidates. We recruit the best people for the job regardless of differences that include gender, ethnicity and other protected traits and it is our policy to comply fully with all federal, state and local laws relating to discrimination in the workplace. We have several employee resource groups that help us to identify opportunities and actions related to DEIB and to better engage underrepresented populations. Our DEIB principles are also reflected in our employee training, and in particular with respect to our policies against harassment and bullying and the elimination of bias in the workplace. We continue to enhance our DEIB policies, with guidance by our executive leadership team.
1213




Government Regulation
Overview
The lending and securities industries are highly regulated. The marketplace, Notes and Borrower LoansEach of the financial products offered by us are all subject to extensive and complex rules and regulations. We also are subject to licensing and examination by various federal, state and local government authorities. These authorities impose obligations and restrictions on our activities, WebBank’s activities and the Borrower Loans acquired and Notes issued through our marketplace.marketplace, Coastal’s activities and the Credit Card product, and Spring EQ and the HELOC product. In particular, these rules may limit the fees that may be assessed, on the Borrower Loans, require extensive disclosure to, and consents from, borrowers, prohibit discrimination, and impose multiple qualification and licensing obligations on marketplaceour activities. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registrations, loss of approved status, voiding of loan contracts, indemnification liabilities to contract counterparties, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions and civil and criminal liabilities. While compliance with such requirements is at times complicated by our novel business model, we believe we are in substantial compliance with these rules and regulations. These rules and regulations are subject to continuous change, however, and a material change could have an adverse effect on our compliance efforts and ability to operate.

From time to time, various types of federal and state legislation are proposed and new regulations are introduced that could result in additional regulation of, and restrictions on, the business of consumer lending. We cannot predict whether any such legislation or regulations will be adopted or how this would affect our business or our important relationships with third parties. In addition, the interpretation of existing legislation may change or may prove different than anticipated when applied to our novel business model. Compliance with such requirements could involve additional costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of consumer lending in the United States, our business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal and state legislation and regulations that may increase the cost of doing business.
Personal Loan State and Federal Laws and Regulations
State Licensing Requirements. In most states we believe that WebBank, as originator of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace, satisfies any relevant licensing requirements with respect to the origination of such Borrower Loans. In addition, as needed, we seek licenses and/or authorizations of various types so that we may conduct activities such as servicing and marketing in all states and the District of Columbia, with the exceptions of Iowa and West Virginia. We are subject to supervision and examination by the state regulatory authorities that administer these state lending laws. The licensing statutes vary from state to state and prescribe or impose different requirements, including: restrictions on loan origination and servicing practices, including limits on finance charges and the type, amount and manner of charging fees; disclosure requirements; requirements that licensees submit to periodic examination; surety bond and minimum specified net worth requirements; periodic financial reporting requirements; notification requirements for changes in principal officers, stock ownership or corporate control; restrictions on advertising; and requirements that loan forms be submitted for review.
State Usury Laws. Section 521 of the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (12 U.S.C. § 1831d) (“DIDA”) and Section 85 of the National Bank Act (“NBA”) (12 U.S.C. § 85), federal case law interpreting the NBA such as Tiffany v. National Bank of Missouri and Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First Omaha Service Corporation, and FDIC advisory opinion 92-47 permit FDIC-insured depository institutions, such as WebBank, to “export” the interest rate permitted under the laws of the state where the bank is located, regardless of the usury limitations imposed by the state law of the borrower’s state of residence unless the state has chosen to opt out of the exportation regime. WebBank is located in Utah, and Title 70C of the Utah Code does not limit the amount of fees or interest that may be charged by WebBank on loans of the type offered through our marketplace. Only Iowa and Puerto Rico have opted out of the exportation regime under Section 525 of DIDA and we do not operate in either jurisdiction. However, we believe that if a state in which we did operate opted out of rate exportation, we believe that judicial interpretations support the view that such opt outs only apply to loans “made” in those states.  
In May 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC that interpreted the scope of federal preemption under the NBA and held that a nonbank assignee of a loan originated by a national bank was not entitled to the benefits of federal preemption of claims of usury. On November 10, 2015, the defendant in the Madden case filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court for further review of the Second Circuit’s decision. On June 27, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition and refused to review the case, leaving the decision of the Second Circuit intact and binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont.The Madden If applieddecision has created some uncertainty as to whether non-bank entities purchasing loans originated by a bank may rely on federal preemption of state usury laws, and may create an increased risk of litigation by plaintiffs challenging our ability to collect interest in accordance with the terms of Borrower Loans. While the decision specifically addressed preemption under the NBA, it could support future challenges to federal preemption for other institutions, including an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank like WebBank. However, although there can be no assurances as to the outcome of any potential
14




litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on our marketplace, we believe the Madden case addressed facts that are not presented by our marketplace lending platform and thus would not apply to Borrower Loans.  
In June 2020, the FDIC issued a final regulation entitled “Federal Interest Rate Authority” that, among other things, addressed the uncertainty resulting from the Madden decision, including uncertainty affecting marketplace lenders that partner with banks. Under the FDIC’s rule, which applies to FDIC-insured state-chartered industrial banks such as WebBank, interest on a loan originated by WebBank that was permissible under DIDA at origination is not affected by WebBank’s subsequent sale of the loan to PFL. Seven states and the District of Columbia sued the FDIC, however, seeking to have the regulation set aside on Administrative Procedure Act grounds. Three states brought a similar challenge in the same court to a similar regulation issued by the OCC under the NBA. Both suits were decided in February 8, 2022, with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruling that the FDIC and OCC had not exceeded their statutory authority when promulgating their respective rules.The court deferred to each federal agency's interpretation, and thus concluded that each agency’s rule was not unreasonable or arbitrary or capricious. The states have until April 11, 2022 to appeal the rulings to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. If the states appeal, a decision by the Ninth Circuit overturning the District Court’s rulings could subject Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace, the Second Circuit’s decision could adversely impact our business.  and PFL purchases from WebBank to state usury laws.
In January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claimsclaimed that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator’s lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank have each intervened in the state court case filed against Marlette and Avant, respectively. We are currentlyOn August 18, 2020, the parties reached a settlement that provides a safe harbor for the Marlette and Avant lending platforms, such that if the lending programs meet certain criteria related to oversight, disclosure, funding, licensing, consumer terms, and structure, the programs will be deemed to be in discussionscompliance with
13


Colorado’s usury limits. On November 9, 2020, we amended our agreements with WebBank to address the Colorado Department of Law regarding the termsrequirements of the loans offeredsafe harbor for extending credit to Colorado residents. No assurance can be provided as to the timing or outcome of these matters.borrowers in Colorado.
If a Borrower Loan made through our marketplace was deemed to be subject to the usury laws of a state that has opted-out of the exportation regime or becomes bound by the Second Circuit’s or a similar judicial decision (including a judicial decision setting aside the FDIC’s regulation governing permissible interest on loans sold by banks to non-banks), we could become subject to fines, penalties, and possible forfeiture of amounts charged to borrowers, and we may decide not to originate Borrower Loans through our marketplace in that applicable jurisdiction, which may adversely impact our growth. For more information, see Item 1A, "Risk“Risk Factors—If our marketplace were found to violate a state’s usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed."
State Securities Laws. We are subject to the securities laws of each state in which the registration or qualification to offer and sell the Notes and PMI Management Rights has been approved. Certain of these state laws require us to renew the registration or qualification of Notes and PMI Management Rights on an annual basis.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) created many new restrictions and an expanded framework of regulatory oversight for the financial services industry. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protections by creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), which has broad authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth-in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions, such as our issuing bank, for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices” through its regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority. We are subject to the CFPB’s jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority and may become subject to their supervisory authority, as a servicer and acquirer of consumer credit. The CFPB may request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities, and also conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis.
Truth-in-Lending Act. The federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”), and Regulation Z, which implements TILA, require creditors to provide consumers with uniform, understandable information concerning certain terms and conditions of their loan and credit transactions. These rules apply to WebBank as the creditor for Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace, but because the transactions are carried out on our hosted website, we facilitate compliance at WebBank’s direction. For closed-end credit transactions of the type provided through our marketplace, these disclosures include providing the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, the amount financed, the number of payments and the amount of the monthly payment. The creditor must provide the disclosures before the Borrower Loan is closed. TILA also regulates the advertising of credit and gives borrowers, among other things, certain rights regarding updated disclosures and the treatment of credit
15




balances. Our marketplace provides borrowers with a TILA disclosure prior to the time a Borrower Loan is originated. We also seek to comply with TILA’s disclosure requirements related to credit advertising.
Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”) prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, or the fact that all or part of the applicant’s income derives from any public assistance program or the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act or any applicable state law. Regulation B, which implements ECOA, restricts creditors from requesting certain types of information from applicants and from making statements that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application. These requirements apply both to a lenderlenders such as WebBank as well as to a party such as Prosperand other parties like us that regularly implementsimplement and communicates acommunicate credit decision.decisions. Investors may also be subject to the ECOA in their capacity as purchasers of Notes, if they are deemed to regularly participate in credit decisions. In the underwriting of Borrower Loans on our marketplace, both WebBank and we seek to comply with ECOA’s provisions prohibiting discouragement and discrimination. ECOA also requires creditors to provide consumers with timely notices of adverse action taken on credit applications. WebBank and we provide prospective borrowers who apply for a Borrower Loan through our marketplace but are denied credit with an adverse action notice which is in compliance with applicable requirements (see also below regarding “Fair Credit Reporting Act”).
Fair Credit Reporting Act. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) promotesand its implementing regulations, including Regulation V, promote the accuracy, fairness and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. FCRA requires a permissible purpose to obtain a consumer credit report, and requires persons to report loan payment information to credit bureaus accurately. FCRA also imposes disclosure requirements on creditors who take adverse action on credit applications based on information contained in a credit report. WebBank and we have a permissible purpose for obtaining credit reports on potential borrowers and WebBank and we also obtain explicit consent from borrowers to obtain such reports. As the servicer for the Borrower Loan, we have systems in
14


place to report Borrower Loan payment and delinquency information to appropriate reporting agencies. We provide an adverse action notice to a rejected borrower on WebBank’s behalf at the time the borrower is rejected that includes all the required disclosures. We have also implemented an identity theft prevention program as required by law.  
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) providesand its implementing regulation, Regulation F, provide guidelines and limitations on the conduct of third-party debt collectors in connection with the collection of consumer debts. The FDCPA limits certain communications with third parties, imposes notice and debt validation requirements, and prohibits threatening, harassing or abusive conduct in the course of debt collection. We are not a “debt collector” under the FDCPA, which the statute defines as a person who regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed or due, or asserted to be owed or due, to another. The CFPB retained the statute’s “debt collector” definition in its November 2020 final rules implementing the FDCPA. As the servicer for Borrower Loans originated by WebBank and owned by investors, we are not a debt collector based on our facilitation of loans in the origination process and/or its servicing of the Borrower Loans after the time of origination and prior to any default. While the FDCPA applies to third-party debt collectors, debt collection laws of certain states impose similar requirements on creditors who collect their own debts. Our agreement with our investors prohibits investors from attempting to collect directly on the Borrower Loan. We use our internal collection team and professional external debt collection agents to collect delinquent accounts. They are required to comply with all other applicable laws in collecting delinquent accounts of our borrowers.  
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties. The SCRA, as well as certain state laws with similar protections for military members, require us to adjust the interest rate of borrowers who qualify for and request relief. If a borrower with an outstanding Borrower Loan qualifies for protection under the SCRA or similar state laws, we will reduce the interest rate on the Borrower Loan to 6% for the duration of the borrower’s active duty. During this period, the investors who have invested in such Borrower Loan will not receive the difference between 6% and the Borrower Loan’s original interest rate. For a borrower to obtain an interest rate reduction on a Borrower Loan due to military service, we require the borrower to send us a written request and written documentation of active duty. We do not take military service into account in assigning Prosper Ratings to borrower loan requests and we do not disclose the military status of borrowers to investors.  
Military Lending Act. The federal Military Lending Act (“MLA”) provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions. Although originally enacted in 2006, the MLA applies to persons engaged in the business of extending consumer credit subject to the disclosure requirements of the TILA and Regulation Z with respect to loans made on or after October 3, 2016. The MLA prohibits creditors from imposing a Military Annual Percentage Rate (“MAPR”) greater than 36% in any consumer credit transaction involving a covered borrower. It also requires certain oral and written disclosures to be provided to covered borrowers. Additionally, the MLA prohibits creditors from requiring covered borrowers to waive rights to legal recourse, submit to arbitration, or pay a prepayment penalty or fee. Both Prosperwe and WebBank have ensured that the loan program complies with the MLA requirements for covered borrowers,
16




including but not limited to the restriction on MAPR, the delivery of required disclosures and the prohibition of mandatory arbitration and waiver of legal recourse.
Other Lending Regulations. We are subject to and seek to comply with other state and federal laws and regulations applicable to consumer lending, including additional requirements relating to loan disclosure, credit discrimination, credit reporting, debt collection and unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices. These laws and regulations may be enforced by state consumer credit regulatory agencies, state attorneys general, the CFPB and private litigants, among others. Given our novel business model and the subjective nature of some of these laws and regulations, particularly laws regulating unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices, we may become subject to regulatory scrutiny or legal challenge with respect to our compliance with these requirements.
Electronic Funds Transfer Act. The federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”), and Regulation E, which implements it, provide guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts. In addition, transfers performed by ACH electronic transfers are subject to detailed timing and notification rules and guidelines administered by the National Automated Clearinghouse Association (“NACHA”). Most transfers of funds in connection with the origination and repayment of the Borrower Loans are performed by ACH. We obtain necessary electronic authorization from borrowers and investors for such transfers in compliance with such rules. Transfers of funds through our marketplace are currently executed by Wells Fargo and conform to the EFTA, its regulations and NACHA guidelines.  
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act/Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (“ESIGN”) and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“UETA”), authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures. ESIGN and UETA require businesses that want to use electronic records or signatures in consumer transactions to obtain the consumer’s consent to receive information electronically. When a borrower or individual investor
15


registers with our marketplace, we obtain his or her consent to transact business electronically and maintain electronic records in compliance with ESIGN and UETA requirements.  
Privacy and Data Security Laws. The federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) limits the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information. Additional state and federal privacy and data security laws require safeguards to protect the privacy and security of consumers’ personally identifiable information, require notification to affected customers in the event of a breach, and restrict certain sharing of nonpublic personal information about a consumer with affiliated entities. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020, provides consumers in the state with rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by businesses that are a certain size or that generate at least half of their revenue by selling personal information. In turn, the CCPA requires subject businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for timely responding to consumer requests submitted in exercise of their rights under the statute, although the CCPA includes certain exceptions for personal information that is protected under GLBA or other federal and state privacy laws. We havemaintain a detailed privacy policy which complies withthat is designed to address GLBA and the CCPA and is accessible from our website. These provisions of the CCPA will be further strengthened by provisions of the California Privacy Rights Act that will become operative January 1, 2023. We maintain security measures designed to protect participants’ personal information, securely, and we do not sell, rent or share such information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes unless previously agreed to by the participant or otherwise permitted by applicable law. In addition, we take a number of measures to safeguard the personal information of our borrowers and investors and to protect it against unauthorized access.  
Bank Secrecy Act. In cooperation with WebBank, we have implemented an anti-money laundering policy and various anti-money laundering procedures to comply with applicable federal law. With respect to new borrowers and investors, we apply the customer identification and verification program rules and screen names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Asset Control’s (“OFAC”) pursuant to the USA PATRIOT Act amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) and its implementing regulation.
NewCredit Card State and Federal Laws and Regulations. From time
The Credit Card product operates under a similar bank partnership model as our personal loan marketplace, whereby through the application of Section 521 of DIDA, Section 85 of the NBA, and federal case law, Coastal may “export” the interest rate permitted under the laws of the State of Washington, where Coastal is located, regardless of the usury limitations imposed by the state law of the cardholder’s state of residence unless the state has chosen to time, various typesopt out of the exportation regime. State privacy and data security laws, including the CCPA, also apply to the Credit Card product.
The Credit Card product is subject to the same federal laws and state legislation are proposed and new regulations are introduced that could result in additional regulation of, and restrictions on, the business of consumer lending. We cannot predict whether any such legislation or regulations will be adopted or how this would affect our business or our important relationships with third parties. In addition, the interpretation of existing legislation may change or may prove different than anticipated when appliedapplicable to our novel business model. Compliancepersonal loan marketplace and as summarized above, including the Dodd-Frank Act, TILA, ECOA, FCRA, FDCPA, SCRA, MLA, EFTA, ESIGN, UETA, GLBA, BSA and OFAC. TILA and Regulation Z contain specific disclosure requirements for credit cards and
17




advertising rules for credit cards. Please refer to the “Government Regulations—Personal Loan State and Federal Laws and Regulations” section above for a summary of these federal laws and regulations. Certain amendments to TILA also govern the Credit Card product, including the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (the “CARD Act”), which amended TILA to prescribe, among other things, additional procedures, disclosures, fee limits, and other protections for consumers applying for or holding credit cards, and the Fair Credit Billing Act (“FCBA”), which governs creditor obligations with such requirements could involve additional costs, which could haverespect to billing complaints and errors. For the Credit Card product, we take a material adverse effect onsimilar approach to compliance for our business. As a consequencepersonal loan marketplace, with adjustments for application of the extensive regulationrules to open-ended, unsecured credit cards as opposed to closed-end personal loans.We work with Coastal to facilitate compliance.
HELOC State and Federal Laws and Regulations
The HELOC product is subject to many of commercial lendingthe same federal laws and regulations as the personal loan marketplace, including the Dodd-Frank Act, TILA, ECOA, FCRA, ESIGN, GLBA, BSA and OFAC. TILA and Regulation Z contain specific disclosure requirements for HELOCs and mortgage advertising rules.State mortgage broker and mortgage lender licensing and registration requirements also apply to the HELOC product, which must satisfy the minimum standards set forth in the United States, our businessfederal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 and Regulation H, as well as state usury laws. State privacy and data security laws, including the CCPA, also apply to the HELOC product.
The HELOC product is particularly susceptiblealso subject to being affectedthe Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”) and its implementing regulation, Regulation X, as well as related guidance issued by federalthe CFPB and state legislationthe Department of Housing and regulations that may increaseUrban Development (“HUD”). RESPA, among other things, prohibits the costpayment or acceptance of doing business.referral fees or kickbacks, or any splitting of fees except for actual services performed. The TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure does not apply to HELOCs. The RESPA and Regulation X mortgage servicing rules do not apply to HELOCs.
Finally, the HELOC product is subject to the data collection and reporting requirements of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (the “HMDA”) and its implementing regulation, Regulation C. Prosper is not directly subject to the HMDA data collection and reporting requirements, but collects data to support the reporting requirements applicable to its financial institution partner.
Foreign Laws and Regulations
We do not permit non-U.S. based individuals to register as borrowers on our marketplace and the marketplace does not operate outside the United States. Therefore, we do not believe that our marketplace is subject to foreign laws or regulations.
Item 1A.Summary of Risk Factors
We are subject to various risks, the most significant of which are summarized below. For more information about these and other risks that may affect us, you should carefully read the factors described in the “Risk Factors” section below.

Risks related to personal loan borrower default

The Notes are risky and speculative investments for suitable investors only.
Payments on the Notes depend entirely on payments PFL receives on corresponding Borrower Loans. If a borrower fails to make any payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan related to a Note, payments on such Note will be correspondingly reduced. If payments on the Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note become more than 30 days overdue, such investor will be unlikely to receive the full principal and interest payments that were expected on the Note.
Borrowers may not view or treat their obligations to PFL as having the same significance as loans from traditional lending sources.
The credit information of an applicant may be inaccurate or may not accurately reflect the applicant’s creditworthiness, which may cause an investor to lose all or part of the price paid for a Note. The fact that we have the exclusive right and ability to investigate claims of identity theft in the origination of Borrower Loans creates a significant conflict of interest between us and our investors.
The Borrower Loans are not secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by any third party, and investors must rely on us or a third-party collection agency to pursue collection against any borrower.
The Prosper Rating may not accurately set forth the risks of investing in the Notes, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will come within the estimated average annualized loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating, and investors have limited rights to cause Prosper to repurchase the Notes.
We may not set appropriate interest rates for Borrower Loans.
Investors who use the Recurring Investment or Auto Invest tools may face additional risk of funding Borrower Loans that have been erroneously selected by the tool.
18




The Borrower Loans do not restrict borrowers from incurring additional unsecured or secured debt, nor do they impose any financial restrictions on borrowers during the term of the Borrower Loan, which may reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the full principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a Note.
In general, the Borrower Loans do not contain any cross-default or similar provisions. If a borrower defaults on any of his or her other debt obligations, our ability to collect on the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment may be substantially impaired.

Risks Inherent in investing in the Notes

The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL only and are not directly secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by PMI or any third party.
PFL is not obligated to indemnify Note holders or repurchase Notes except in limited circumstances.
Our marketplace allows a borrower to prepay a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. Borrower Loan prepayments will extinguish or limit an investor’s ability to receive additional interest payments on a Note.
We may choose or be required to implement payment and collections relief programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies or crises, which may extend or otherwise alter the repayment schedule of Borrower Loans and reduce the expected return on the corresponding Notes.
The Notes will not be listed on any securities exchange and can be held only by registered Prosper investors. Further, no trading platform for the transfer of Notes exists. Therefore, investors should be prepared to hold the Notes they purchase until maturity.
Our participation in the funding of Borrower Loans could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest.

Risks related to PFL and PMI, our marketplace and our ability to service the notes

We have experienced errors on our platform that have resulted in incorrect reporting of performance returns to Note investors. If we are unable to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors, investors could be adversely impacted.
Arrangements for back-up servicing are limited. If PMI fails to maintain operations or the Administration Agreement is rejected or terminated (in bankruptcy or otherwise), investors may experience a delay and increased cost in respect of their expected principal and interest payments on Notes, and PFL may be unable to collect and process repayments from borrowers.
PMI, in its capacity as servicer, has the authority to waive or modify the terms of a Borrower Loan without the consent of the Note holders.
We have incurred operating losses in prior years and may continue to incur net losses in the future.
PFL relies on a third-party commercial bank to process transactions. If PFL is unable to continue utilizing these services, its business and ability to service the Notes may be adversely affected.
Any significant disruption in service in our marketplace or in PMI’s computer systems could adversely affect PMI’s ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement. If the security of PFL’s investors’ and borrowers’ confidential information stored in our systems is breached, users’ secure information may be stolen, our reputations may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liability.

Risks related to compliance and regulation

Our marketplace represents a novel approach to borrowing and investing that may fail to comply with federal and state securities laws, borrower protection laws and the state counterparts to such consumer protection laws. Borrowers may dispute the enforceability of their obligations under borrower or consumer protection laws after collection actions have commenced, or otherwise seek damages under these laws. Investors may attempt to rescind their Note purchases under securities laws. Regulatory agencies and their state counterparts may investigate our compliance with these regulatory obligations, and may take enforcement action with respect to alleged law violations. There continues to be uncertainty as to how the actions of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or any other new agency could impact our business or that of our issuing bank. If our marketplace were found to violate a state’s usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed. If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Company Act or the Investment Advisers Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected. Several lawsuits have sought to recharacterize certain loan marketers and other originators as lenders. If litigation or a regulatory enforcement action on similar theories were successful against one or both of PMI and PFL, Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace could be subject to state consumer protection laws and licensing requirements in a greater number of states.
We rely on agreements with WebBank, pursuant to which WebBank originates loans to qualified borrowers on a uniform basis throughout the United States and sells and assigns those loans to PFL. If our relationship with WebBank were to end, we may need to rely on individual state lending licenses to originate Borrower Loans.
19




PMI's administration of Quick Invest under its previous offering and PFL’s administration of Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, and Auto Invest under its current offering, could create additional liability for PFL and such liability could be material.
Recent Developments
COVID-19
We continue to track the impact of COVID-19 and its variants on our communities, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to 4 monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment may continue as long as the pandemic continues to trigger financial hardship for borrowers.
Available Information
The following filings are available for download free of charge at www.prosper.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such filings are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC’s website, at www.sec.gov. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, when evaluating our business. Any of the following risks, either alone or taken together, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. While we believe the risks and uncertainties described below include all material risks currently known by us, it is possible that these may not be the only ones we face.
RISKS RELATED TO PERSONAL LOAN BORROWER DEFAULT
The Notes are risky and speculative investments for suitable investors only.
Investors should be aware that the Notes offered through our marketplace are risky and speculative investments. The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL and depend entirely for payment on PFL’s receipt of payments under the corresponding Borrower Loans. Notes are suitable only for investors of adequate financial means. If an investor cannot afford to lose the entire amount of such investor’s investment in the Notes, the investor should not invest in the Notes.
16


Payments on the Notes depend entirely on payments PFL receives on corresponding Borrower Loans. If a borrower fails to make any payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan related to a Note, payments on such Note will be correspondingly reduced.
PFL will only make payments pro ratapro-rata on a series of Notes after it receives a borrower’s payment on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of servicing fees. PFL also will retain from the funds received from the relevant borrower and otherwise available for payment on the Notes any non-sufficient funds fees and the amounts of any attorneys’ fees or collection fees our in-house collections department, a third-party servicer or collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts. Under the terms of the Notes, if PFL does not receive any or all payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan, payments on the Note will be correspondingly reduced in whole or in part. If the relevant borrower does not make a payment on a specific monthly loan payment date, no payment will be made on the Note on the corresponding succeeding Note payment date.
The Borrower Loans are not secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by any third party, and investors must rely on us or a third-party collection agency to pursue collection against any borrower.
Borrower Loans are unsecured obligations of borrowers. They are not secured by any collateral, and they are not guaranteed or insured by PFL, PMI or any third party, or backed by any governmental authority in any way. We and our third-party collection agencies will, therefore, be limited in our ability to collect on Borrower Loans. Moreover, Borrower Loans are obligations of borrowers to PFL as successor to WebBank, not obligations to the holders of Notes. Holders of the Notes will
20




have no recourse to the borrowers and no ability to pursue borrowers to collect payments under Borrower Loans. Holders of the Notes may look only to PFL for payment of the Notes.

Furthermore, if a borrower fails to make any payments on the Borrower Loan, the holders of the Notes corresponding to that Borrower Loan will not receive any payments on their Notes. The holders of such Notes will not be able to pursue collection against the borrower and will not be able to obtain the identity of the borrower in order to contact the borrower about the defaulted Borrower Loan.
The credit information of an applicant may be inaccurate or may not accurately reflect the applicant’s creditworthiness, which may cause an investor to lose all or part of the price paid for a Note.
We obtain applicant credit information from consumer reporting agencies, and assign Prosper Ratings to listings based in part on the applicant’s credit score. A credit score that forms a part of the Prosper Rating assigned to a listing may not reflect the applicant’s actual creditworthiness because the credit score may be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. Similarly, the credit data taken from the applicant’s credit report and displayed in listings may also be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. We do not verify the information obtained from the applicant’s credit report. Moreover, investors do not, and will not, have access to financial statements of applicants or to other detailed financial information about applicants.
The Prosper Rating may not accurately set forth the risks of investing in the Notes, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will come within the estimated average annualized loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating, and investors have limited rights to cause Prosper to repurchase the Notes.
The Prosper Rating assigned to a loan listing may not accurately reflect the risks of investing in the Notes, and is not a recommendation by us to buy sell or hold a Note. For example, the Prosper Rating for a listing could be inaccurate because the applicant’s credit report contained incorrect information. Similarly, although mostsome of the information provided by applicants that is relevant to the Prosper Rating is verified by us before calculating the Prosper Rating, we do not verify all such information. For example, we do not verify the income or employment information on all applications. Further, the Prosper Rating does not reflect PFL’s credit risk as a debtor (such credit risk exists even though, as the debtor on the Notes, PFL’s only obligation is to pay to the Note holders their pro ratapro-rata shares of collections received on the related Borrower Loans net of applicable fees). In addition, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will fall within the expected loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating. The interest rates on the Notes might not adequately compensate Note investors for these additional risks.
If we include in a listing a Prosper Rating that is different from the Prosper Rating calculated by us or calculate the Prosper Rating for a listing incorrectly, and such error materially and adversely affects a holder’s interest in the related Note, PFL will indemnify the holder or repurchase the Note. PFL will not, however, have any indemnity or repurchase obligation under the Amended and Restated Indenture, the Notes, the Investor Registration Agreement or any other agreement associated with the Note Channel as a result of any other inaccuracy with respect to a listing’s Prosper Score or Prosper Rating. PFL’s contractual repurchase obligations do not affect a Note holder’s rights under federal or state securities laws.
17


Investors who use the Recurring Investment or Auto Invest tools may face additional risk of funding Borrower Loans that have been erroneously selected by the tool.
Since it was first implemented in July 2011 through December 31, 2018,2021, the Recurring Investment tool (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) tool has experienced programming errors that affected 8,630 Notes and PMI Notes out of the 10,941,08511,999,556 Notes and PMI Notes purchased. The Auto Invest tool was first implemented on June 2, 2016. Since such time through December 31, 2018,2021, the Auto Invest tool has experienced programming errors that affected 2 Notes out of the 4,517,1908,583,286 Notes purchased.
In the event of any errors in Recurring Investment or Auto Invest that cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note such investor would have purchased had there been no error, PFL will either repurchase the Note, indemnify the investor against losses suffered on that Note or cure such error. See "Risk Factors - “Risk Factors—Risks Related to PFL and PMI, Our Marketplace and Our Ability to Service the Notes"Notes” for more information.
Some borrowers may use our marketplace to defraud investors, which could adversely affect investors’ ability to recoup their investment.
We use identity and fraud checks with external databases to authenticate each borrower’s identity. There is a risk, however, that these checks could fail and fraud may occur. In addition, applicants may misrepresent their intentions regarding loan purpose or other information contained in listings, and we do not verify the majority of this information. While PFL will indemnify an investor or repurchase Notes in limited circumstances (including, e.g., a material payment default on the Borrower Loan resulting from verifiable identity theft), it is not obligated to indemnify an investor or repurchase a Note from an investor if the investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud (other than verifiable identity theft) in connection with a loan listing, or due to false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a listing, whether in credit data, a borrower’s
21




representations, similar indicators of borrower intent and ability to repay the Borrower Loan. If PFL repurchases a Note, the repurchase price will be equal to the Note's outstanding principal balance and will not include accrued interest. If PFL repurchases any Notes, PMI will concurrently repurchase the related PMI Management Rights for zero consideration.
The fact that we have the exclusive right and ability to investigate claims of identity theft in the origination of Borrower Loans creates a significant conflict of interest between us and our investors.
We have the exclusive right to investigate claims of identity theft and determine, in our sole discretion, whether verifiable identity theft has occurred. Such a determination of verifiable identity theft may trigger an obligation by PFL to either repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans or indemnify the applicable Note holders. The denial of a claim under PFL’s identity theft guarantee would save PFL from its indemnification or repurchase obligation. Because investors rely solely on us to investigate incidents that might require PFL to indemnify the applicable Note holders or repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans, a conflict of interest exists between us and such investors.
If payments on the Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note become more than 30 days overdue, such investor will be unlikely to receive the full principal and interest payments that were expected on the Note, and such investor may not recover the original purchase price on the Note.
We may refer Borrower Loans that become past due to a third party collection agency for collection or we may collect on such Borrower Loans directly. If a borrower fails to make a required payment on a Borrower Loan within 30 days of the due date, we will pursue reasonable collection efforts in respect of the Borrower Loan. Referral of a delinquent Borrower Loan to a collection agency within five business days after it becomes 30 days past due will be considered reasonable collection efforts. If payment amounts on a delinquent Borrower Loan are received from a borrower after the loan has been referred to our in-house collections department or an outside collection agency, we or that collection agency may retain a percentage of that payment as a fee before any principal or interest becomes payable to an investor. Collection fees may be up to 40% of recovered amounts, in addition to any legal fees and transaction fees associated with accepting payments incurred in the collection effort.
For some non-performing Borrower Loans, we may not be able to recover any of the unpaid loan balance and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive little, if any, of the unpaid principal and interest payable under the Note. In all cases, investors must rely on our collection efforts or the applicable collection agency to which
18


such Borrower Loans are referred, and are not permitted to collect or attempt collection of payments on the Borrower Loans in any manner.
Loss rates on the Borrower Loans may increase as a result of economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of the borrower.borrower, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Borrower Loan loss rates may be significantly affected by economic downturns or general economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of individual borrowers. In particular, loss rates on Borrower Loans may increase due to factors such as prevailing interest rates, the rate of unemployment, the level of consumer confidence, residential real estate values, the value of the U.S. dollar, energy prices, changes in consumer spending, the number of personal bankruptcies, disruptions in the credit markets, natural disasters, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and other factors.
The Borrower Loans do not restrict borrowers from incurring additional unsecured or secured debt, nor do they impose any financial restrictions on borrowers during the term of the Borrower Loan, which may reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the full principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a Note.
If a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted, the additional debt may impair the ability of that borrower to make payments on his or her Borrower Loan and, as such, reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a corresponding Note. Moreover, the additional debt may adversely affect the borrower’s creditworthiness generally, and could result in the financial distress, insolvency, or bankruptcy of the borrower. To the extent that the borrower has or incurs other indebtedness and cannot pay all of his or her indebtedness, the borrower may choose to make payments to other creditors, rather than to PFL.
To the extent borrowers incur other indebtedness that is secured, such as a mortgage, a home equity line or an auto loan, the ability of the secured creditors to exercise remedies against the assets of the borrower may impair the borrower’s ability to repay the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment. Borrowers may also choose to repay obligations under secured indebtedness or other unsecured indebtedness before repaying Borrower Loans because there is no collateral securing the Borrower Loans. An investor will not be notified if a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted.
Marketplace lending is a new lending method
22




Borrowers may be more likely to incur additional unsecured or secured debt in an effort to mitigate economic disruption, which may further reduce their likelihood of repaying Borrower Loans.
The economic disruption caused by inflation, issues in the supply chain of goods, and our marketplace has a limited operating history. changes in the labor market due to the global spread of COVID-19 have affected both consumers and small businesses, self-employed individuals and independent contractors whose livelihoods depend on providing in-person goods and services.
In response to the global spread of COVID-19, in March 2020 Congress enacted and the president signed into law the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The relief measures provided by these laws include expanding eligibility criteria for Small Business Administration loan programs. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic and legislation passed in response to the pandemic result in borrowers incurring additional debt above and beyond ordinary levels, borrowers’ overall ability to repay Borrower Loans may be further impaired.
Borrowers may not view or treat their obligations to PFL as having the same significance as loans from traditional lending sources.
The investment return on the Notes depends on borrowers fulfilling their payment obligations in a timely and complete manner under the corresponding Borrower Loan. Borrowers may not view marketplace lending obligations originated through our marketplace as having the same significance as other credit obligations arising under more traditional circumstances. If a borrower neglects his or her payment obligations on a Borrower Loan upon which payment of an investor’s Note is dependent or chooses not to repay his or her Borrower Loan entirely, such investor may not be able to recover any portion of the investment in a Note.
Our marketplace may fail to comply with applicable law, which could limit our ability to collect on Borrower Loans.
The Borrower Loans are subject to federal and state consumer protection laws. Our marketplace may not always be, and may not always have been, in compliance with these laws. Failure to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements applicable to our marketplace may, among other things, limit our or a collection agency's ability to collect all or part of the principal of or interest on Borrower Loans.
We regularly review the requirements of these laws and take measures aimed at ensuring that the Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace meet the requirements of all applicable laws. However, determining compliance with all applicable laws is a complex matter and it is possible that our determination may be inaccurate or incorrect. Also, changes in law, either due to court decisions, regulatory interpretations or rulings, or new legislation, may adversely affect the collectability of a Borrower Loan.
19


In general, the Borrower Loans do not contain any cross-default or similar provisions. If a borrower defaults on any of his or her other debt obligations, our ability to collect on the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment may be substantially impaired.
The Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions. A cross-default provision makes a default under certain debt of a borrower an automatic default on other debt of that borrower. Because the Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions, a Borrower Loan will not be placed automatically in default upon that borrower’s default on any of the borrower’s other debt obligations. If a borrower defaults on debt obligations owed to a third party and continues to satisfy the payment obligations under the Borrower Loan, the third party may seize the borrower’s assets or pursue other legal action against the borrower before the borrower defaults on the Borrower Loan, which may affect our ability to collect from the borrower when or if the Borrower Loan becomes delinquent.
Borrowers may seek the protection of debtor relief under federal bankruptcy or state insolvency laws, which may result in the nonpayment of an investor’s Notes.
Borrowers may seek protection under federal bankruptcy law or similar laws. If a borrower files for bankruptcy (or becomes the subject of an involuntary petition), a stay will go into effect that will automatically put any pending collection actions on the Borrower Loan on hold and prevent further collection action absent bankruptcy court approval. If we receive notice that a borrower has filed for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws, or has become the subject of an involuntary bankruptcy petition, we will put the borrower’s account into “bankruptcy status.” When this occurs, we terminate automatic monthly ACH debits on the Borrower Loan and we will not undertake collection activity without bankruptcy court approval. Whether any payment will ultimately be made or received on a Borrower Loan after a bankruptcy status is declared depends on the borrower’s particular financial situation. In most cases, however, unsecured creditors such as PFL receive nothing, or only a fraction of their outstanding debt and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive none or very little of the unpaid principal and interest payable on the Note.
Federal law entitles borrowers who enter active military service to an interest rate cap and certain other rights that may inhibit the ability to collect on Borrower Loans and reduce the amount of interest paid on the corresponding Notes.
23




Federal law provides borrowers on active military service with rights that may delay or impair our ability to collect on a Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) and other similar state laws require that the interest rate on preexisting debts, such as Borrower Loans, be set at no more than 6% while the qualified service member or reservist is on active duty. A holder of a Note that is dependent on such a Borrower Loan for payment will not receive the difference between 6% and the original stated interest rate for the Borrower Loan during any such period. The SCRA also permits courts to stay proceedings and the execution of judgments against service members and reservists on active duty, which may delay recovery on any Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments on the corresponding Notes.
Beginning October 3, 2016, the Military Lending Act (“MLA”) prohibits requiring covered borrowers, which include active military servicemembers and their dependents, to waive the right to legal recourse or to submit to arbitration. This may delay recovery on any relevant Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments on the corresponding Notes.
If there are any amounts under such a Borrower Loan still due and owing to PFL after the final maturity of the corresponding Notes, PFL will have no further obligation to make payments on such Notes, even if it receives payments on the Borrower Loan after the final maturity of such Notes. We do not take military service into account in assigning a Prosper Rating to loan listings. In addition, as part of the borrower registration process, we do not request borrowers to confirm if they are qualified service members or reservists within the meaning of the SCRA or the MLA. See Item 1, "Business—“Business—Government Regulation"Regulation” for more information.
As of December 31, 2018, 1012021, 76 Borrower Loans, with a total outstanding balance of $851 thousand$0.6 million are subject to the SCRA.

The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.
The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule, which in certain circumstances permits borrowers to assert any claims and defenses that they would have had against a seller of goods or services obtained with the proceeds of a
20


loan against an originator or subsequent purchaser of the loan, could allow certain borrowers to raise such defenses against PFL to the extent of the outstanding loan balance. If such defenses are successfully raised, PFL will be unable to collect on the loan and it is unlikely that any further payment will be made on the corresponding Notes.
The death of a borrower may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.
If a borrower dies while his or herwith an outstanding Borrower Loan, PFL is still outstanding, generally,required, upon receiving notice of the death, to stop accepting automatic loan payments and to refund any payments that were automatically debited after the borrower's date of death. Though we willmay seek to work with the executor of the borrower’s estate to obtain repayment of the loan. However,loan, the borrower’s estate may not contain sufficient assets to repay the loan, or the relatedits executor or trustee may prioritize repayment of other creditors. In addition, if a borrower dies near the end of the term of his or her Borrower Loan, it is unlikely that any further payments will be made on the corresponding Notes because the time required for the probate of the borrower’s estate will probablylikely extend beyond the Notes’ final maturity date, ofafter which date PFL will cease to have any obligation to make payments on the Notes.
RISKS INHERENT IN INVESTING IN THE NOTES
The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL only and are not directly secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by PMI or any third party.
The Notes will not represent an obligation of borrowers, PMI or any other party except PFL, and are special, limited obligations of PFL. The Notes are not guaranteed or insured by PMI, any governmental agency or instrumentality, or any third party. Although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in the Borrower Loans corresponding to the Notes, the payments and proceeds that PFL receives on such Borrower Loans, the bank account in which such Borrower Loan payments are deposited, and the accounts in which investors’ funding amounts are deposited, the Note holders do not themselves have a direct security interest in the Borrower Loans or the right to payment thereunder. If an event of default under the Amended and Restated Indenture were to occur, the Note holders would be dependent on the indenture trustee’s ability to realize on the collateral and make payments on the Notes in the manner contemplated by the Amended and Restated Indenture. In addition, although PFL will take all actions that it believes are required under applicable law to perfect the security interest of the indenture trustee in the collateral, if its analysis of the required actions is incorrect or if it fails to take any required action in a timely manner, the indenture trustee’s security interest may not be effective and holders of the Notes could be required to share the collateral (and any proceeds thereof) with PFL’s other creditors, or, if a bankruptcy court were to order the substantive consolidation of PMI and PFL (as described below), PMI’s creditors.
PFL is not obligated to indemnify Note holders or repurchase Notes except in limited circumstances.
24




PFL is only obligated to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes in limited circumstances. These circumstances include if (i) a material payment default under the corresponding Borrower Loan occurs as a result of verifiable identify theft; (ii) we include a Prosper Rating in a listing that is different from the Prosper Rating we calculated, or we calculate the Prosper Rating incorrectly; or (iii) if any errors in Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, or Auto Invest cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note, in which cases PFL also has the option to cure such error. PFL is not required to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes, however, if the Note holder’s investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud other than verified identity theft, or due to other false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a listing, whether in credit data, borrower representations or similar indicia of borrower intent and ability to repay the loan. Further, PFL is under no obligation to repurchase a Note or indemnify any holder of Notes if a correctly-determinedcorrectly determined Prosper Rating fails to accurately predict the actual losses on a Borrower Loan.
PFL might incur indemnification and repurchase obligations that exceed its projections, in which case it may not have sufficient liquidity to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations.
PFL believes its liquidity will be sufficient to meet its reasonably anticipated indemnification and repurchase obligations. In determining its expected liquidity needs with respect to indemnification and repurchase obligations, PFL considers the history of such obligations incurred by it and PMI. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that if PFL is obligated to repurchase a Note or indemnify a Note holder, that it will be able to meet its repurchase or indemnification obligations. If PFL is unable to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations with respect to a Note, the investor in such Note may lose all of such investor’s investment in the Note.
21


Our marketplace allows a borrower to prepay a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. Borrower Loan prepayments will extinguish or limit an investor’s ability to receive additional interest payments on a Note.
Borrower Loan prepayment occurs when a borrower decides to pay some or all of the principal amount on a Borrower Loan earlier than originally scheduled. Borrowers may decide to prepay all or a portion of the remaining principal amount due under a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. In the event of a prepayment of the entire remaining unpaid principal amount of a Borrower Loan, each of the holders of the Notes corresponding to the Borrower Loan will receive his or her share of such prepayment but further interest will not accrue on such Borrower Loan or on such Note after the date on which the payment is made. If the borrower prepays a portion of the remaining unpaid principal balance, the term of the Borrower Loan will not change, but interest will cease to accrue on the prepaid portion. If a borrower prepays a Borrower Loan in whole or in part, an investor will not receive all of the interest payments that such investor originally expected to receive on the Note corresponding to such Borrower Loan. In addition, such investor may not be able to find a similar rate of return on another investment at the time at which the Borrower Loan is prepaid. Prepayments are subject to PFL’s servicing fee, even if the prepayment occurs immediately after issuance of a Note.
Prevailing interest rates may change during the term of the Notes. If this occurs, investors may receive less value from the purchase of Notes in comparison to other ways they may invest their money. Additionally, borrowers may prepay their Borrower Loans due to changes in interest rates, and investors may not be able to redeploy the amounts received from prepayments in a way that offers the return expected from the Notes.
The Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for payment bear fixed, not floating, rates of interest. If prevailing interest rates increase, the interest rates on Notes investors purchase might be less than the rate of return they could earn if they had invested the purchase price in a different investment.
We may not set appropriate interest rates for Borrower Loans.
We set interest rates for all Borrower Loans based on Prosper Ratings, as well as additional factors such as Borrower Loan terms, the economic environment and competitive conditions. If we set interest rates for Borrower Loans too low, investors may not be compensated appropriately for the level of risk that they are assuming in purchasing Notes, while setting the interest rate too high may increase the risk of non-payment. In either case, a failure by us to set rates appropriately may adversely impact the ability of investors to receive returns on their Notes that are commensurate with the risks they have assumed in acquiring such Notes.
The Notes will not be listed on any securities exchange and can be held only by registered Prosper investors. Further, no trading platform for the transfer of Notes exists and there can be no assurance a trading platform for the transfer of Notes will develop in the future. Therefore, investors should be prepared to hold the Notes they purchase until maturity.
The Notes and PMI Management Rights will not be listed on any securities exchange and all Notes and PMI Management Rights must be held by registered Prosper investors. Further, in connection with Prosper’sthe termination of itsour relationship with FOLIOfnFOLIO Investments, Inc. in October 2016, a trading platform for the transfer of Notes and PMI Management Rights no longer exists. While we may, in our sole discretion, permit the establishment of another platform on which a secondary market may be made with respect to the Notes, there can be no assurance a trading platform for the Notes and PMI
25




Management Rights will develop in the future. Therefore, Note purchasers must be prepared to hold their Notes and PMI Management Rights to maturity.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Notes are uncertain.
There are no statutory provisions, regulations, published rulings or judicial decisions that directly address the characterization of the Notes or instruments similar to the Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, although the matter is not free from doubt because payments on the Notes are dependent on payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan, PFL treats the Notes as debt instruments that have original issue discount (“OID”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Where required, PFL intends to file informationinformational returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)IRS in accordance with such treatment unless there is a change or clarification in the law, by regulation or otherwise, that would require a different characterization of the Notes. Investors should be aware, however, that the IRS is not bound by PFL’s characterization of the Notes and the IRS or a court may take a different position with respect to the Notes’ proper characterization. For example, the IRS could determine that, in substance, each investor owns a proportionate interest in the corresponding Borrower Loan for
22


U.S. federal income tax purposes or, for example, the IRS could instead treat the Notes as a different financial instrument (including an equity interest or a derivative financial instrument). Any different characterization could significantly affect the amount, timing, and character of income, gain or loss recognized in respect of a Note. For example, if the Notes are treated as PFL’s equity, (i) PFL would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income, including interest, accrued on the corresponding Borrower Loans but would not be entitled to deduct interest or OID on the Notes, and (ii) payments on the Notes would be treated by the Note holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes as dividends (that may be ineligible for reduced rates of U.S. federal income taxation or the dividends-received deduction) to the extent of PFL’s earnings and profits as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A different characterization may significantly reduce the amount available to pay interest on the Notes. Investors are strongly advised to consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the Notes (including any possible differing treatments of the Notes).
PFL’s ability to pay principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability to match the timing of its income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Investors should be aware that PFL’s ability to pay principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to match the timing of income it receives from a corresponding Borrower Loan that it holds and the timing of deductions that it may be entitled to in respect of payments made on the Notes that it issues. For example, if the Notes are treated as contingent payment debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes but the corresponding Borrower Loans are not, there could be a potential mismatch in the timing of PFL’s income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and PFL’s resulting tax liabilities could affect its ability to make payments on the Notes.
Our participation in the funding of Borrower Loans could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest.
As is the practice with other marketplace lending companies, from time to time, we may fund portions of qualified loan requests in our marketplace and hold any Notes purchased as a result of such funding for our own individual accounts. Even though we will participate in funding Borrower Loans listed in our marketplace under the same terms and conditions and through the use of the same information that is made available to other potential investors in our marketplace, such participation may be perceived as involving a conflict of interest. For example, our funding of a Borrower Loan may cause the loan to fund, and in some cases, fund faster, than it would fund in the absence of our participation, which could benefit us to the extent that it ensures that Prosper generateswe generate the revenue associated with the loan.
During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, we purchased $71 thousand$0.1 million in Notes for investment.
We may choose or be required to implement payment and collections relief programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies or crises, which may extend or otherwise alter the repayment schedule of Borrower Loans and reduce the expected return on the corresponding Notes.
The global spread of COVID-19 has caused significant market volatility and workforce disruptions. We recognize the serious economic hardship triggered by COVID-19, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to 4 monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months total and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. We are also complying with new state mandates that may temporarily impact collections activity with respect to delinquent loans.
Our COVID-19 payment relief programs may impact the repayment schedule and terms of Borrower Loans and the returns received on corresponding Notes. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment and subsequent loan performance may fluctuate as long as the pandemic continues to trigger increased work stoppages and unemployment.
26




Likewise, to the extent we are required to comply with state mandates to pause collections activity on delinquent loans, investors will not receive recoveries on any Notes corresponding to Borrower Loans that cannot be collected upon while such mandates are in effect. We continue to actively monitor the impact of COVID-19 on economic conditions.   
RISKS RELATED TO PFL AND PMI, OUR MARKETPLACE AND OUR ABILITY TO SERVICE THE NOTES
We have experienced errors on our platform that have resulted in incorrect reporting of performance returns to Note investors. If we are unable to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors, investors could be adversely impacted.
In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors.investors, which resulted from errors in the code forming part of our calculation framework. On average, the error resulted in Note investors being shown annualized net return information that was approximately 260 basis points higher than the actual performance of Notes in their accounts. The error did not affect any other part of Note investors’ accounts, nor did it affect any other aspects of the platform, including the receipt and distribution of loan payments, deposits, monthly statements or tax documentation, or the Note and loan level information provided to investors. Following an SEC investigation, we entered into a settlement with the SEC to resolve the matter on April 19, 2019. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a negligence-based violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. PFL paid the penalty in full on April 24, 2019.
The error was the result of errors in the code forming part of our calculation framework and reveals a risk associated with the complex programs, algorithms and inputs that support our platform. We depend on these programs, algorithms and inputs to store, retrieve, process and manage data, as well as to provide marketplace features such as our credit assessments and underwriting, the Prosper Rating, historical returns, and individual Note, Note portfolio and platform-wide performance data. Errors or other design defects within these programs, algorithms and inputs may result in a negative experience for borrowers and investors, delay introductions of new features or enhancements, or impact the information displayed on our website. They could also result in negative publicity and unfavorable media coverage, harm to our reputation, litigation, regulatory inquiries or proceedings, loss of or damage to our relationships with borrowers or investors, or loss of revenue or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
23


Arrangements for back-up servicing are limited. If PMI fails to maintain operations or the Administration Agreement is rejected or terminated (in bankruptcy or otherwise), investors may experience a delay and increased cost in respect of their expected principal and interest payments on Notes, and PFL may be unable to collect and process repayments from borrowers.
If the Administration Agreement (or the loan servicing provisions thereof) are terminated for any reason (whether as a result of PMI’s bankruptcy, non-performance or otherwise), PFL would attempt to transfer the loan servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and Notes to a third party pursuant to its contractual agreements with investors.
PFL has entered into a back-up servicing agreement with a loan servicing company that is willing and able to transition servicing responsibilities from PMI. There can be no assurance, however, that this back-up servicer will be able to adequately perform the servicing of the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes. If this back-up servicer assumes the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes, the back-up servicer may impose additional servicing fees (up to the maximums we have negotiated), reducing the amounts available for payments on the Notes. Additionally, transferring these servicing obligations to the back-up servicer may result in delays in the processing of collections on Borrower Loans and information with respect to amounts owed on Borrower Loans. If the back-up servicer is not able to service the Borrower Loans and Notes effectively, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on their Notes may be substantially impaired, even if their portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the corresponding Borrower Loans are paying on schedule.
In addition, it is unlikely that the back-up servicer would be able to perform functions other than servicing the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, such as facilitating the creation of new Borrower Loans through our marketplace, or managing PFL’s marketing efforts. PFL believes that it could find one or more other parties who could perform these and any other functions necessary to fully operate our marketplace in the absence of PMI. However, this process, and any related onboarding of such party or parties, will take time. Any such delay or impairment that diddoes not affect existing Note holders, because PFL or its back-up servicer proves able to continue servicing outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, could nonetheless delay PFL’s ability to facilitate the origination of new Borrower Loans and issue new Notes through our marketplace, which could adversely affect PFL’s finances and usercustomer relationships.
A decline in economic conditions may adversely affect our customers, which may negatively impact our business and results of operations.
As a lending marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to
27




participate in our marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect our business and results of operations. For more information about risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic, see “—Public health emergencies and other events beyond our control may damage our ability to continue operations without disruptions, including our ability to attract new borrowers and investors, retain existing investors, as well as the ability of existing borrowers to repay their loans. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.”
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace.
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace. If these investors cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our personal loan marketplace and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our business could be adversely affected by a weakening market for securities backed by consumer assets.
PFL is involved in the securitization market throughthrough: (i) its business of selling loans to investors who, in turn, sell asset backed securities based on accumulated loan portfolios.portfolios and (ii) securitization of loans retained by affiliates of PFL. If the market for asset backed securities based on consumer assets weakens, investors may cease or significantly decrease their funding of Borrower Loans through our marketplace and if PFL has been unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
24


Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding, if this were to occur, the rights of holders of the Notes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited, suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder on a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.
Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if this were to occur, the recovery, if any, of a holder of a Note may be substantially delayed in time (for example, due to the imposition of a stay on payments by the bankruptcy court) and may be substantially less in amount than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note even if a Note holder’s portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the Borrower Loans are paying on schedule. Further, although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in all of the Borrower Loans, in all payments and proceeds it receives on the corresponding Borrower Loans and in the bank account in which the Borrower Loan payments are deposited, the holders of the Notes would still be subject to risks associated with PFL’s insolvency, bankruptcy or a similar proceeding.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, borrowers may delay payments or cease making payments at all.
Borrowers may delay or suspend making payments to PFL because of the uncertainties associated with PFL becoming subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, even if the borrowers have no legal right to do so, and such delay would reduce, at least for a time, the funds that might otherwise be available to pay the Notes corresponding to those Borrower Loans. In addition, the commencement of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding may, as a matter of law, prevent PFL from making regular payments on the Notes, even if the funds to make such payments are available. Because the Indenture trustee would be required to enforce its security interest in the Borrower Loans in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, the Indenture trustee's ability to make payments under the Notes would be delayed, which may effectively reduce the value of any recovery that a holder of a Note may receive (and no such recovery can be assured) by the time any recovery is available.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, borrowers may delay payments or cease making payments at all.
Borrowers may delay or suspend making payments to PFL because of the uncertainties occasioned by its becoming subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, even if the borrowers have no legal right to do so, and such delay would reduce, at least for a time, the funds that might otherwise be available to pay the Notes corresponding to those Borrower Loans.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, interest accruing on the Notes upon and following such bankruptcy or similar proceeding may not be paid.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding forof PFL, interest accruing on the Notes during the proceeding may not be part of the allowed claim of a holder of a Note. If the Note holder receives a recovery on the Note (and no such recovery can be assured), any such recovery may be based on, and limited to, the Note holder’s claim for principal and for interest accrued up to the date of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding, but not thereafter. Because a bankruptcy or similar proceeding may take months or years to complete, a claim based on principal and on interest only up to the start of the bankruptcy or similar
28




proceeding may be substantially less than a claim based on principal and on interest through the end of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, a Note holder of a Note may not have any priority right to payment from the corresponding Borrower Loan, may not have any right to payment from funds in the depositapplicable servicing account, and may not have any ability to access funds in the investors’applicable funding accounts (the “FBO Funding accounts”).
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if PFL has failed to perfect the security interest in Borrower Loans, investors may be required to share the proceeds of the Borrower Loans upon which their Notes are dependent for payment with PFL’s other creditors, including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans. To the extent that proceeds of the Borrower Loans would be shared with PFL’s other creditors, any secured or priority rights of such other creditors may cause the proceeds to be distributed to such other creditors before any distribution is made to investors on the corresponding Notes.
If a payment is made on a Borrower Loan corresponding to a Note before PFL’s bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, and those funds are held in the depositservicing account PFL maintains with Wells Fargo to collect borrower payments and have not been used by PFL to make payments on the Note as of the date the bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, there can be no assurance that PFL will or will be able to use such funds to make payments on such Note. Other creditors of PFL (including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans) may be deemed to have rights to such funds or interests in the depositapplicable servicing account and monies credited thereto that are equal to or greater than the rights of the holder of such Note.
25


Although PFL believes that amounts funded by both Whole Loan Channel and Note Channel investors into the applicable FBO Funding accounts should not be subject to claims of its creditors other than the investors for whose benefit the funds are held, the legal title to the FBO Funding accounts, and the attendant right to administer the FBO Funding accounts, would be property of PFL’s bankruptcy estate. As a result, if PFL were to file for bankruptcy protection, the legal right to administer the funds in the FBO Funding accounts would vest with the bankruptcy trustee or debtor in possession. In that case, while neither PFL nor its creditors should be able to reach those funds, the indenture trustee or the investors may have to seek a bankruptcy court order lifting the automatic stay and permitting them to withdraw their funds. Investors may suffer delays in accessing their funds in the FBO Funding accounts as a result. Moreover, U.S. Bankruptcy CourtsUnited States bankruptcy courts have broad powers at law and in equity and, if PFL has failed to properly segregate or handle investors’ funds, a bankruptcy court could determine that some or all of such funds were beneficially owned by PFL and should therefore be made available to PFL’s creditors generally.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, a holder of a Note may be delayed or prevented from enforcing PFL’s repurchase obligations with respect to such Note.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, any right of a Note holder to require PFL to repurchase the Note or indemnify such Note holder under the circumstances set forth in the Investor Registration Agreement or the Note might not be enforceable, and such holder’s claim for such repurchase may be treated less favorably than a general unsecured obligation of PFL.
Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PFL were substantively consolidated in this manner, the rights of the holders of the Notes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited, suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder on a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.
Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PMI became subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding and PFL were substantively consolidated with PMI, the risks described in the immediately preceding risk factors regarding (i) payment delays, (ii) uncollectability of interest accrued during the bankruptcy proceeding, (iii) being subordinated to the interests of PFL’s other creditors, and (iv) the indenture trustee’s inability to access funds in the deposit account or the FBO Funding accounts, would all be present and, in addition, the same considerations would apply in relation to the claims of creditors of PMI, including that such creditors of PMI may be determined to have perfected security interests or unsecured claims that take precedence over or are at least equal in priority to those of creditors of PFL (including holders of Notes).
In addition, in the event of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PMI, (i) the implementation of back-up servicing arrangements may be delayed or prevented, and (ii) PMI’s ability to transfer its servicing obligations to a back-up servicer or to transfer its other corporate and marketplace administration services and marketing services to third parties may be limited and subject to the approval of the bankruptcy court or other presiding authority. The bankruptcy process may delay or prevent the implementation of back-up servicing, which may impair the collection on Borrower Loans to the detriment of holders of the Notes.Note holders.
PMI owns and did not transfer to PFL ownership of the computer hardware that it uses to host and maintain the website or agreements with third parties relating to the hosting and maintenance of the website. Although PMI’s retention of
29




such hardware and agreements should not bear on a bankruptcy court’s analysis of the legal separateness of PMI and PFL (or their respective assets and liabilities), the cessation of or substantial reduction of the day-to-day operations of PMI (because of or during its bankruptcy or otherwise) would materially impair and delay the ability of PFL or a back-up service provider to retrieve data and information in the possession of PMI and to operate our marketplace or elements thereof relevant to Borrower Loan and Note servicing.
PMI, in its capacity as servicer, has the authority to waive or modify the terms of a Borrower Loan without the consent of the Note holders.
Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PMI is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to service and collect on the Borrower Loans in accordance with industry standards. Subject to that obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to (i) waive or modify any non-material term of a Borrower Loan, (ii) consent to the postponement of strict compliance with any such term, and (iii)or in any manner grant a non-material indulgence to any borrower. In addition, if a Borrower Loan is in default, or PMI determines a default is reasonably foreseeable or that such action is consistent with its
26


servicing obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to waive or modify a material term of a Borrower Loan, to accept payment of an amount less than the principal balance in final satisfaction of a Borrower Loan and to grant any indulgence to a borrower, provided that PMI has reasonably and prudently determined that such action will not be materially adverse to the interests of the relevant Note holders. If PMI approves a modification to the terms of any Borrower Loan it must promptly notify the corresponding Note holders in each Note holder's account.
There can be no assurance that PMI, in its capacity as servicer, will be able to collect the principal amount or interest rate agreed to and/or sell charged off Borrower Loans in the future as a result of business, regulatory or other considerations.
Prosper hasWe have incurred operating losses since inceptionin prior years and may continue to incur net losses in the future.
Prosper hasWe have incurred operating losses since its inceptionin prior years and it may continue to incur net losses in the future. For the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017, Prosper2020, we incurred lossesa loss of $39.9$138.3 million and $115.2generated income of $18.6 million, respectively. Additionally, from itsour inception through December 31, 2018, Prosper2021, we have had an accumulated deficit of $420.8$554.3 million.
Prosper hasWe have financed itsour operations to date primarily with proceeds from the sale of equity securities. At December 31, 2018, Prosper2021, we had approximately $57.9$67.7 million unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and $22.2 million available for sale investments at fair value.equivalents. PMI is dependent upon raising additional capital or debt financing to fund its current operating plan if it cannot generate sufficient positive cash flow from operations. Prosper'sPMI’s failure to achieve positive cash flow from operations or obtain sufficient debt and equity financing, could adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.
Although our business has grown, we may be unable to manage our growth effectively and meet the demands that such growth places on our facilities, employees and infrastructure.  
As the number of borrowers, investors and Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace increases, PMI will need to increase its facilities, personnel and infrastructure in order to continue performing effectively its obligations under the Administration Agreement and to accommodate the effects that such growth will have on our servicing and marketplace needs. PMI must constantly add new hardware and update its software and our personal loan marketplace, expand customer support services, and add new employees to maintain the operations of our personal loan marketplace as well as to satisfy its servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and the Notes and its other obligations under the Administration Agreement. If PMI is unable to increase the capacity of our marketplace and maintain the necessary infrastructure to perform its duties under the Administration Agreement, PFL, or one or more other third-party service providers engaged by PFL, will have to perform the duties otherwise performed by PMI, and investors may experience delays in receipt of payments on their Notes and periodic downtime of our marketplace.
PFL hasThe Credit Card and HELOC products are new products which are complex and require us to allocate significant resources to the development, launch and growth of these new products. If these new products are unable to attract borrowers and generate revenue, our business and results of operations could suffer.
The HELOC product was launched in March 2019 and our Credit Card product was launched in December 2021. The launch of these new and complex products requires us to allocate significant resources in hiring new employees to support each product, ensuring each product complies with new laws and regulations, and integrating the products into our online platform. See Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information about the laws and regulations which affect the Credit Card and HELOC products. There is no guarantee that we will attract the borrowers necessary to generate sufficient revenue to recoup the investment of resources into the development, launch, and growth of these new products. The products may also divert management’s time and effort from other initiatives.
Our Credit Card product is also subject to the risk of fraud or borrower identity theft and we may experience losses on, or inability to recoup losses resulting from, fraudulent Credit Card applications or fraudulent transactions made on Credit
30




Cards. Our Credit Card product is currently focused on higher risk borrowers, who may have higher exposure to economic downturns and general economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of these borrowers. As a result, we may experience significant delinquency rates and fraud and credit losses. Our borrower profile and recent entry into the credit card market could increase these risks and potential losses.
The Credit Card and HELOC products are not available on our personal loan marketplace for investment purposes. The Credit Card and HELOC products did not have a material impact on our revenue as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021.
PFL’s reliance on PMI or other third-party service providers, lack of employees, limited operating history.history, and capitalization levels could make it difficult to operate at a sustainable level.
PFL was formed in 2012 as a limited purpose vehicle. Under the Administration Agreement, PFL receives a license fee from PMI for granting PMI a non-exclusive, worldwide license to access and use our marketplace. In addition, PFL earns servicing fees in relation to the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes that it retains from collections on the Borrower Loans. PFL believes this fee income is sufficient to cover its reasonably anticipated obligations. While PFL believes that it is adequately capitalized to meet its foreseeable obligations, and that its fee income is sufficient to meet its ongoing operating costs, its financial resources are limited and could prove to be insufficient. In addition, PFL has no employees and relies on PMI, as servicer, or other third-party service providers, to perform most of its day-to-day operations. The lack of PFL’s own employees, its limited operating history, and capitalization that is less than that of PMI could make it difficult for PFL to operate at a level that will be sustainable. Absent the services to be provided to PFL by PMI pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PFL's risk management process, ability to predict loss rates and the general operation of our marketplace would have a thinnersmaller margin for error than does PMI.
The market in which we participate is competitive and, if we do not compete effectively, our operating results could be harmed.

The consumer lending market is competitive and rapidly changing. With the introduction of new technologies and the influx of new entrants, we expect competition to persist and intensify in the future, which could harm our ability to increase volume in our marketplace.

27


Our principal competitors include major banking institutions, credit unions, credit card issuers, and othermortgage lenders, consumer finance companies, as well as LendingClub and other marketplaceonline lending platforms. Competition could result in reduced volumes, reduced fees or the failure of our marketplace to achieve or maintain more widespread market acceptance, any of which could harm our business. In addition, in the future we may experience new competition including companies possessing large, existing customer bases, substantial financial resources and established distribution channels. If any of these companies or any major financial institution decideddecides to enter our marketplaceonline lending business,sector, acquire one of our existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one of our competitors, our ability to compete effectively could be significantly compromised and our operating results could be harmed.

Most of our current or potential competitors have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than Prosper doeswe do and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their marketplaces and distribution channels. Our potential competitors may also have longer operating histories, more extensive customer bases, greater brand recognition and broader customer relationships than we have. These competitors may be better able to develop new products, to respond quickly to new technologies and to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns. Our industry is driven by constant innovation. If we are unable to compete with such companies and meet the need for innovation, the use of our marketplace could stagnate or substantially decline.
If Prosper failswe fail to promote and maintain itsour brand in a cost-effective manner, itwe may lose market share and itsour revenue may decrease.
To succeed, Prosperwe must increase transaction volumes in our marketplace by attracting a large number of borrowers and investors in a cost-effective manner, many of whom have not previously participated in marketplace lending.manner. If we are not able to attract qualified borrowers and sufficient investor purchase commitments, we will not be able to increase itsour transaction volumes. PFL believes that developing and maintaining awareness of its brand in a cost-effective manner is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our marketplace and attracting new borrower and investors. Furthermore, we believe that the importance of brand recognition will increase as competition in the marketplace lendingour industry increases. Successful promotion of our brand will depend largely on the effectiveness of marketing efforts and the user experience on our marketplace. These brand promotion activities may not yield increased revenues. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand, we may lose our existing users to competitors or be unable to attract new users, which would cause our revenue to decrease and may impair our ability to maintain our marketplace.
The proprietary technology that makes operation of our marketplace possible is not fully protected by any patents. It may be difficult and costly for PFL to protect its intellectual property rights in relation thereto, or to continue to develop or obtain new technologies, which could adversely affect its ability to operate competitively.
31




On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred ownership of the marketplace, including the proprietary technology and all of the rights related to the operation of the marketplace, to PFL. PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace depends, in part, upon this proprietary technology. We intendhave taken steps to vigorously protect our proprietary interests in such technology.technology, including through patent filings, and intend to continue to vigorously protect these interests. Despite our best efforts, however, we may not protect the proprietary technology effectively, which would allow competitors to duplicate our products and adversely affect our ability to compete. A third party may attempt to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use the proprietary technology without PFL’s consent. In addition, our marketplace may infringe upon claims of third-party patents and PFL or PMI may face intellectual property challenges from such other parties. PFL or PMI may not be successful in defending against any such challenges or in obtaining licenses to avoid or resolve any intellectual property disputes. Furthermore, the technology may become obsolete, and there is no guarantee that PFL will be able to successfully develop, obtain or use new technologies to adapt our marketplace to compete with other marketplace lending companies. If PFL cannot protect the proprietary technology embodied in and used by our marketplace from intellectual property challenges, or if our marketplace becomes obsolete, PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace and perform its servicing obligations could be adversely affected and, in such event, its ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.
PFL relies on a third-party commercial bank to process transactions. If PFL is unable to continue utilizing these services, its business and ability to service the Notes may be adversely affected.
Because PFL is not a bank, it cannot belong to or directly access the Automated Clearing House (ACH) payment network. As a result, it currently relies on an FDIC-insured depository institution to process its transactions. If PFL cannot continue to obtain such services from this institution or elsewhere, or if it cannot transition to another processor quickly, its ability to process payments will suffer and investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes will be delayed or impaired.
28


If the security of PFL's investors' and borrowers' confidential information stored in our systems is breached or otherwise subjected to unauthorized access, users' secure information may be stolen, our reputations may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liability.
As with any entity with a significant Internet presence, we and the third parties that Prosper useswe use for website hosting and mobile technologies occasionally have experienced cyber-attacks, breaches of our and their systems and other similar incidents, which to-date have not had a material effect on our business, operations or reputation. Future attacks are likely to occur. Our marketplace stores PFL’s investors’ and borrowers’ bank information and other personally-identifiablepersonally identifiable sensitive data. Any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access could cause users’ secure information to be stolen and used for criminal purposes. Security breaches or unauthorized access to secure information could also expose us to liability related to the loss of the information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and negative publicity. If security measures are breached because of third-party action, employee or contractor error, malfeasance, faulty password management or otherwise, or if design flaws in the relevant software are exposed and exploited, and, as a result, a third party or disaffected employee obtains unauthorized access to any investors’ or borrowers’ data, PFL’s relationships with its users could be severely damaged, and PFL (or PMI) could incur significant liability. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we and PMI’s third-party hosting facilities may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. In addition, many states have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving their personal data. These mandatory disclosures regarding a security breach are costly to implement and often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may cause our users to lose confidence in the effectiveness of PFL’s and PMI’s data security measures. Further, California has recently enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, a comprehensive bill that affords individuals in the state affected by data breaches a private right of action against companies that have allegedly been the target of such breaches due to a failure to implement and maintain appropriate cybersecurity policies and procedures. Any security breach, whether actual or perceived, would harm our reputations, and we could lose users.
In addition, we face an increased risk of cyber-attacks during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has forced us and many other companies to institute remote work protocols in order to protect the health and safety of employees. We use industry standard technologies to maintain secure remote work protocols and protect sensitive data within our control, and we require employees to complete security awareness training at regular intervals. However, we are necessarily limited in our ability to control or ensure the security of networks that employees use to work remotely. Further, cybersecurity experts and officials are reporting increased phishing, spoofing and other cyber-attack efforts during COVID-19, as hackers seek to take advantage of the uptick in remote work.
Any significant disruption in service in our marketplace or in PMI’s computer systems could adversely affect PMI’s ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement.
PMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement could be materially and adversely affected by events outside of its control. The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of PMI's technology and its
32




underlying network infrastructure are important to our respective operations, level of customer service, reputation and ability to attract new users and retain existing users. PMI's system hardware is hosted in several hosting facilities located in Las Vegas, NevadaNevada; Scottsdale, Arizona; The Dalles, Oregon; and Scottsdale, Arizona, that are owned and operated by Switch and Cyxtera, respectively.Council Bluffs, Iowa. Our hosting facilities service providers do not guarantee that access to our marketplace or to PMI's own systems will be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. The operation of our marketplace and PMI's operation of its own systems dependdepends on Switch and Cyxtera'sour service providers' ability to protect the relevant systems in their facilities against damage or interruption from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality, temperature, humidity or other environmental concerns, computer viruses or other attempts to harm them, criminal acts and similar events. As noted above, there is an increased risk of cyber-attacks during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has forced many companies to implement remote work protocols and resulted in greater attempts by malicious actors to carry out cyber-attacks. If PMI's arrangement with eitherany hosting facilities service provider is terminated, or there is a lapse of service or damage to such provider's facilities, PMI could experience interruptions in providing its services under the Administration Agreement, PFL could experience interruptions in the operations of our marketplace, and both could experience delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities. Any interruptions or delays in PMI'sPMI’s performance of its services or in the functioning of and accessibility of our marketplace, whether as a result of a hosting facility service provider or other third-party error, PMI's error, natural disasters or security breaches, whether accidental or willful, could harm PFL'sPFL’s relationships with users and its reputation. Additionally, in the event of damage or interruption, PMI's insurance policies may not be sufficient for PMI to adequately compensate PFL for any losses that it may incur. PMI's disaster recovery plan has not been tested under actual disaster conditions, and PMI may not have sufficient capacity to recover all data and services in the event of an outage at one or bothmore hosting facilities. These factors could prevent PMI from processing or posting payments on the Borrower Loans or the Notes, damage PFL's brand and reputation, divert the attention of PMI's employees, reduce PFL's revenue, subject PMI or PFL to liability and cause users to abandon our marketplace, any of which could adversely affect our respective businesses, financial condition and results of operations. 
Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions.
Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions. If a “hacker”hacker were able to infiltrate our marketplace, users would be subject to the increased risk of fraud or borrower identity theft and may experience losses on, or delays in the recoupment of amounts owed on, a fraudulently induced purchase of a Note. Additionally, if a hacker were able to access our secure files, he or shethey might be able to gain access to users’ personal
29


information. While we have taken steps to prevent such activity from affecting our marketplace, if we are unable to prevent such activity, the value of investors’ investment in the Notes could be adversely affected.
Competition for Prosper'sour employees is intense, and Prosperwe may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees it needswe need to perform under the Administration Agreement.
Competition for highly skilled technical and financial personnel is extremely intense. ProsperWe may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at compensation levels consistent with itsour existing compensation and salary structure. Many of the companies with which Prosper competeswe compete for experienced employees have greater resources than Prosper haswe do and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.
In addition, Prosper investswe invest significant time and expense in training itsour employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek to recruit them. If Prosper failswe fail to retain itsour employees, itwe could incur significant expenses in hiring and training their replacements and the quality of our services and our ability to serve borrower and investors could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect on PMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired. See Item 1, “Business—Human Capital Resources” for more information about Prosper’s employees.
Purchasers of Notes will have no control over us and will not be able to influence our corporate matters.
PFL is not offering and will not offer equity interests in its company. Investors who purchase Notes offered through our marketplace will have no equity interest in either of us and no ability to vote on or influence our decisions. As a result, PMI, which owns all of PFL's outstanding equity interests, will continue to have sole control over PFL's governance matters, subject to the presence of PFL's independent directors, whose consent will be required before PFL can take certain extraordinary actions, and subject to the limitations specified in PFL's organizational documents and the Amended and Indenture.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions that may be difficult to integrate, fail to achieve their strategic objectives, disrupt our business or divert management attention.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions of businesses, technologies and products that it intends to complement its existing business, solutions, services and technologies. PMI cannot provide assurance that the acquisitions it has made or will make in the future will provide it with the benefits or achieve the results anticipated in entering into the transaction. Acquisitions are typically accompanied by a number of risks, including: difficulties assimilating and retaining the management and other personnel, culture and operations of the acquired
33




businesses; potential disruption of ongoing business and distraction of management; difficulties in maintaining acceptable standards, controls, procedures and policies, including integrating financial reporting and operating systems, particularly with respect to foreign and/or public subsidiaries; potential loss of existing or acquired strategic operating partners, users and customers following an acquisition; difficulties in integrating acquired technologies and products into our solutions and services; and unexpected costs and expenses resulting from the acquisition, and potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses.
In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt, acquisition-related costs and expenses, restructuring charges and write-offs. Acquisitions may also result in goodwill and other intangible assets that are subject to impairment tests, which could result in future impairment charges.
PMI may enter into negotiations for acquisitions that are not ultimately consummated. Those negotiations could result in diversion of management time and significant out-of-pocket costs. If PMI fails to evaluate and execute acquisitions successfully, PMI may not be able to achieve its anticipated level of growth and its business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Events beyond our control may damage our ability to maintain adequate records, maintain our marketplace or perform the servicing obligations. If such events result in a system failure, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes would be substantially harmed.
If a catastrophic event resulted in a marketplace outage and physical data loss and/or affected our electronic data storage and back-up storage systems, PFL’s ability (and PMI’s ability as servicer under the Administration Agreement) to perform its servicing obligations would be materially and adversely affected. Such events include, but are not limited to, fires, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, natural disasters, computer viruses and telecommunications failures. In the event of any marketplace outage or physical data loss described in this paragraph, PFL cannot guarantee that investors would be able to recoup their investment in the Notes.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015,Events beyond our control, such as public health emergencies, international conflicts, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events, may damage our ability to continue operations without disruptions, including our ability to attract new borrowers and investors, retain existing investors, as well as the ability of existing borrowers to repay their loans. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Our business is subject to the risk that external events, such as public health emergencies, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events, could disrupt our day-to-day operations and impair the activities of borrowers and investors on our marketplace. Unforeseen events, or the prospect of such events, including acts of war (including the recent invasion of Ukraine by Russia), terrorism and other international conflicts, public health issues including health epidemics or pandemics, such as COVID-19, and natural disasters such as fires, hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados or other adverse weather and climate conditions, whether occurring in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions that may be difficult to integrate, fail to achieve their strategic objectives,United States or elsewhere, could disrupt our business or divert management attention.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and inoperations, disrupt the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions of businesses, technologies and products that it intends to complement its existing business, solutions, services and technologies. PMI cannot provide assurance that the acquisitions it has made or will make in the future will provide it with the benefits or achieve the results anticipated in entering into the transaction. Acquisitions are typically accompanied by a number of risks, including: difficulties assimilating and retaining the management and other personnel, culture and operations of the acquired businesses; potentialour vendors or result in political or economic instability. These events could reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive services from our vendors. Any such disruption of ongoing business and distraction of management; difficulties in maintaining acceptable standards, controls, procedures and policies, including integrating financial reporting and operating systems, particularlycould also damage our reputation, which would further lower investor or borrower demand for our products. We could also be subject to claims or litigation with respect to foreign and/losses caused by such disruptions. Our property and business interruption insurance may not cover a particular event at all or public subsidiaries; potential lossbe sufficient to fully cover our losses.
For example, the COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies, including us, to adopt wide-scale remote work protocols in an attempt to protect workforce health and slow community spread of the disease. While we have business continuity procedures in place to guide our response to a crisis, our attention may be diverted away from normal operations and our resources may be constrained. Likewise, borrowers and investors living in areas impacted by COVID-19 or other crises may also experience work slowdowns or stoppages, diminishing their capacity to apply for loans or invest through our marketplace. For existing borrowers, work slowdowns or acquired strategic operating partners, users and customers following an acquisition; difficulties in integrating acquired technologies and products into our solutions and services; and unexpected costs and expenses resulting from the acquisition, and potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses.
In addition, acquisitionsstoppages may directly result in the incurrenceinability to make loan payments, and may impair investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the corresponding Notes. Additionally, a potential recession or volatility in capital markets as a result of debt, acquisition-related costspublic health emergencies may cause existing investors to cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our marketplace. If such events continued for an extended period of time and expenses, restructuring chargesPFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and write-offs. Acquisitionsexisting investors, our business and results of operations may also result in goodwill and other intangible assets that are subject to impairment tests, which could result in future impairment charges.
be materially adversely affected.
3034



PMI may enter into negotiations for acquisitions that are not ultimately consummated. Those negotiations could result in diversion of management time and significant out-of-pocket costs. If PMI fails to evaluate and execute acquisitions successfully, PMI may not be able to achieve its anticipated level of growth and its business and operating results could be adversely affected.
RISKS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE AND REGULATION
Our marketplace represents a novel program that must comply with regulatory regimes applicable to consumer credit transactions as well as with regulatory regimes applicable to securities transactions. The novelty of our marketplace means compliance with various aspects of such laws is untested. Certain state laws generally regulate interest rates and other charges and require certain disclosures, and also require licensing for certain activities. In addition, other state laws, public policy and general principles of equity relating to the protection of consumers, unfair and deceptive practices and debt collection practices may apply to the origination, servicing and collection of Borrower Loans in our marketplace. Our marketplace isWe are also subject to other laws, such as:
the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of their loans;
the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, which amended the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and requires additional procedures, disclosures, fee limits and other protections for consumers applying for or holding open end credit cards;
the Fair Credit Billing Act, which amended the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and creates creditor obligations with respect to billing complaints and errors for credit card customers;
the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act;
the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and Regulation V, which regulates the use, reporting and disclosure of information related to each applicant’s credit history;
the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Regulation F, which regulates debt collection practices by “debt collectors” and prohibits debt collectors from engaging in certain practices in collecting, and attempting to collect, outstanding consumerpersonal loans;
state counterparts to the above consumer protection laws;
state and federal securities laws, which require that any non-exempt offers and sales of the Notes be registered;
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, and Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in connection with any consumer financial product or service;
the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which includes limitations on financial institutions’ disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties, in certain circumstances requires financial institutions to limit the use and further disclosure of nonpublic personal information by nonaffiliated third parties to whom they disclose such information and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information, and other privacy laws and regulations;
the California Consumer Privacy Act, which provides consumers in the state with extensive rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by certain businesses, and which obligates such businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for addressing consumer requests regarding their personal data;
the Bankruptcy Code, which limits the extent to which creditors may seek to enforce debts against parties who have filed for bankruptcy protection;
the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or hertheir full attention to military duties;
the federal Military Lending Act, which provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions;
31


the federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which provide disclosure requirements, guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts;
the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures; and
the federal Bank Secrecy Act, which relates to compliance with anti-money laundering, customer due diligence and record-keeping policies and procedures.procedures;
35




the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Regulation X, which applies to the HELOC product;
the federal Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C, which applies to the HELOC product; and
state mortgage broker and licensing and registration requirements that meet the minimum standards set forth in the federal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 and Regulation H.
We may not always be in compliance with these laws. Borrowers may make counterclaims regarding the enforceability of their obligations under borrower or consumer protection laws after collection actions have commenced, or otherwise seek damages under these laws. Investors may attempt to rescind their Note purchases under securities laws, and PFL or PMI’s failure to comply with such laws could also result in civil or criminal liability. Compliance with these requirements is also costly, time-consuming and limits operational flexibility. See Item 1, "Business—“Business—Government Regulation” for more information.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a relatively new agency, and thereThere continues to be uncertainty as to how the agency's actions or the actions of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or any other new agency could impact our business or that of our issuing bank.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB"(“CFPB”), which commenced operations in July 2011, has broad authority over the businesses in which we engage. This includes authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth in Lending Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices through its regulatory, supervisory, and enforcement authority. To assist in its enforcement, the CFPB maintains an online complaint system that allows consumers to log complaints with respect to various consumer finance products, including the loan products we facilitate. This system could inform future CFPB decisions with respect to its regulatory, enforcement or examination focus.
We are subject to the CFPB's jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority. The CFPB may therefore request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities. In addition, the CFPB may conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis if the CFPB were to determine, based on, for example, consumer complaints, judicial opinions, or administrative decisions, that we are engaging in activities that pose risks to consumers. In addition, the CFPB has announced that it plans to make a rule for the direct supervision of nonbank installment lenders, which may permit the CFPB to conduct periodic examinations of our business.
There continues to be uncertainty as to how the CFPB's strategies and priorities, including in both its examination and enforcement processes, will impact our businesses and our results of operations going forward. Actions by the CFPB could result in requirements to alter or cease offering affected loan products and services, making them less attractive and restricting our ability to offer them.
Although we have committed resources to enhancing our compliance programs, actions by the CFPB or other regulators against us, our issuing bankbanks or our competitors that discourage the use of the marketplace model or suggest to consumers the desirability of other loan products or services could result in reputational harm and a loss of borrowers or investors. Our compliance costs and litigation exposure could increase materially if the CFPB or other regulators enact new regulations, change regulations that were previously adopted, modify, through supervision or enforcement, past regulatory guidance, or interpret existing regulations in a manner different or stricter than have been previously interpreted.

Noncompliance with laws and regulations may impair our ability to facilitate the origination of or service Borrower Loans.

Generally, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements may, among other things, limit our or a third party collection agency's ability to collect all or part of the principal amount of or interest on the Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for payment. In addition, non-compliance could subject us to damages, revocation of required licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions, and civil and criminal liability, which may harm PFL's business and ability to maintain our marketplace and may result in borrowers rescinding their Borrower Loans.
32


Where applicable, we seek to comply with state lending, servicing and similar statutes, and we continually evaluate our licensing needs. In U.S. jurisdictions with licensing or other requirements that we believe may be applicable to our marketplace, we have obtained necessary licenses or comply with the relevant requirements. Nevertheless, if we are found to not comply with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or face other sanctions, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to continue to facilitate the origination of Borrower Loans through our marketplace, and on our ability to perform servicing obligations or make our marketplace available to borrowers in particular states, which may impair investors' ability to receive the payments of principal and interest on the Notes that they expect to receive.
If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.
36




If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed. The interest rates that are charged to borrowers and that form the basis of payments to investors through our marketplace are based upon the ability under federal law of the issuing bank that originates the loan to export the interest rates of the state where it is located and on Prosper'sour ability to assist the bank in arranging such loans. WebBank, the bank that issues personal loans through our marketplace, exports the interest rates of Utah, which allows parties to generally agree by contract to any interest rate. The interest rates offered by WebBank through our marketplace for Borrower Loans as of December 31, 20182021 range from 5.31% to 31.82%, which equate to interest rates for Note investors that range from 4.31% to 30.82%. Some states where borrowers are located, including Utah, have no statutory interest rate limitations on personal loans, while other jurisdictions have a maximum rate less than the current maximum rate offered by WebBank through our marketplace. If a borrower were to successfully bring claims against us for state usury or other state law violations, we could be subject to fines and penalties. Further, if the current structure under which WebBank makes personal loans through our marketplace were successfully challenged, we may have to substantially modify our business operations and may be required to maintain state-specific licenses and only provide a limited range of interest rates for Borrower Loans, all of which may substantially reduce our operating efficiency and attractiveness to investors and possibly result in a decline in our operating results. Recent litigation has successfully challenged lending arrangements in which banks or other exempt entities make loans and sell those loans to a third party charged with servicing the loans.
In addition, it is possible that state usury laws may impose liability that could affect an assignee's (i.e., PFL's and/or an investor who purchases Borrower Loans from PFL) ability to continue to charge to borrowers the interest rates that they agreed to pay at origination of their Borrower Loans.
As discussed in Part I, Item 1, "Business—“Business—Government Regulation—State Usury Laws"Laws” above, in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC, in May 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concludedissued a decision in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC that interpreted the debt buyerscope of a charged off credit card account could not rely onfederal preemption under the National Bank Act'sAct and held that a nonbank assignee of a loan originated by a national bank was not entitled to the benefits of federal preemption of state interest rate limitsclaims of usury. On November 10, 2015, the defendant in the Madden case filed a petition for interest at rates imposed bya writ of certiorari with the debt buyer after chargeoff.  TheUnited States Supreme Court for further review of the Second Circuit’s decision. On June 27, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition and refused to review the case, leaving the decision which isof the Second Circuit intact and binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont,Vermont. The Madden decision has created some uncertainty as to whether non-bank entities purchasing loans originated by a bank may rely on federal preemption of state usury laws, and may create an increased risk of litigation by plaintiffs challenging our ability to collect interest in accordance with the terms of Borrower Loans. While theMadden decision specifically addressed preemption under the National Bank Act, it could support future challenges to federal preemption for other institutions, including an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank like WebBank. However, although there can be no assurances as to the outcome of any potential litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on our marketplace, we believe the Maddencase addressed facts that are not presented by our marketplace lending platform and thus would not apply to Borrower Loans.
More recently,In June 2020, the FDIC issued a final regulation entitled “Federal Interest Rate Authority” that, among other things, addressed the uncertainty resulting from the Madden decision, including uncertainty affecting marketplace lenders that partner with banks. Under the FDIC’s rule, which applies to FDIC-insured state-chartered industrial banks such as WebBank, interest on a loan originated by WebBank that was permissible under DIDA at origination is not affected by WebBank’s subsequent sale of the loan to PFL. Seven states and the District of Columbia sued the FDIC, however, seeking to have the regulation set aside on Administrative Procedure Act grounds. Three states brought a similar challenge in the same court to a similar regulation issued by the OCC under the NBA. Both suits were decided in February 8, 2022, with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruling that the FDIC and OCC had not exceeded their statutory authority when promulgating their respective rules.The court deferred to each federal agency's interpretation, and thus concluded that each agency’s rule was not unreasonable or arbitrary or capricious. The states have until April 11, 2022 to appeal the rulings to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. If the states appeal, a decision by the Ninth Circuit overturning the District Court’s rulings could subject Borrower Loans and PFL purchases from WebBank to state usury laws.
In January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claimsclaimed that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator'sregulator’s lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank have each intervened in the state court case filed against Marlette and Avant, respectively. On August 18, 2020, the parties reached a settlement that provides a safe harbor for the Marlette and Avant lending platforms, such that if the lending programs meet certain criteria related to oversight, disclosure, funding, licensing, consumer terms, and structure, the programs will be deemed to be in compliance with Colorado’s usury limits. On November 9, 2020, we amended our agreements with WebBank to address the requirements of the safe harbor for extending credit to borrowers in Colorado.
37




We are currentlyhad separately been in discussions with the Colorado Department of Law during the Marlette and Avant litigation regarding thecertain terms of the loansBorrower Loans offered to Colorado residents. However, noEffective as of July 30, 2019, we and the Administrator entered into a stipulation for the continued operation of the loan program in Colorado, subject to certain financing charge and late fee restrictions during the period that the stipulation is in effect. The stipulation remains in place but may be terminated with 21 days’ notice by either party. No further assurance can be provided as to the timing or outcome of these matters.the stipulation.
We and our counsel are monitoring these matters closely and, as developments warrant, we will consider any necessary changes to our marketplace required to avoid the impact of these cases on our business model. Because of investor demand, the maximum annual percentage rates offered through our marketplace may be lower in some states than others.
33


We rely on agreements with WebBank, pursuant to which WebBank originates personal loans on a uniform basis to qualified borrowers throughout the United States and sells and assigns those loans to PFL. If our relationships with WebBank were to end, we may need to rely on individual state lending licenses or partner with a different bank to originateoffer Borrower Loans.
Borrower Loan requests take the form of an application to WebBank submitted through our marketplace. WebBank currently makes all personal loans to borrowers through our marketplace, which allows our marketplace to be available to borrowers on a uniform basis throughout the United States. If our relationships with WebBank were to end or if WebBank were to cease operations, one or both of PMI and PFL may need to rely on individual state lending licenses or we would need to partner with a different bank to originate Borrower Loans. Because neither of us currently possesses all required licenses to lend in every state, we might be forced to limit the rates of interest charged on Borrower Loans in some states and we might not be able to originate personal loans in some states altogether. If we partner with a new bank, service on our marketplace could be disrupted and delayed as we transition to a different bank partner. We also may face increased costs and compliance burdens if the agreements with WebBank are terminated.
Several lawsuits have sought to recharacterize certain loan marketers and other originators as lenders. If litigation or a regulatory enforcement action on similar theories were successful against one or both of PMI and PFL, Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace could be subject to state consumer protection laws and licensing requirements in a greater number of states.
Several lawsuits in the lending industry primarily involving high-interest “payday loan” marketers have brought under scrutiny the association between those firms and out-of-state banks. These lawsuits assert the loan marketers use out-of-state lenders in order to evade the consumer protection laws imposed by the states where they do business. Such litigation has sought to re-characterize the loan marketer as the lender for purposes of state consumer protection law and usury restrictions. Similar civil actions have been brought in the context of gift cards and retail purchase finance. Although we believe that our activities are generally distinguishable from the activities involved in these cases, a court or regulatory authority could disagree.
Additional state consumer protection laws would be applicable to the Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace if one or both of us were re-characterized as a lender, and the Borrower Loans could be voidable or unenforceable. In addition, we could be subject to claims by borrowers, as well as enforcement actions by regulators. Even if we were not required to cease doing business with residents of certain states or to change our business practices to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could be required to register or obtain licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose a substantial cost on us.
As Internetonline commerce develops, federal and state governments may draft and propose new laws to regulate commerce over the Internet, commerce, which may negatively affect our businesses.
As Internetonline commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation by federal and state governments becomes more likely. Our businesses could be negatively affected by the application of existing laws and regulations or the enactment of new laws applicable to marketplace lending. The cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, and we may be unable to pass along those costs to our users in the form of increased fees. In addition, federal and state governmental or regulatory agencies may decide to impose taxes on services provided over the Internet.online. These taxes could discourage the use of the Internet as a means of consumer lending, which would adversely affect the viability of our marketplace.
If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Company Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.
The Investment Company Act of 1940 or the(the “Investment Company Act,”Act”) contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment companies” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL and PMI believe each has conducted its business in a manner that does not result in being characterized as an investment company. If, however, PFL is deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, it may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and its activities may be restricted, which would materially adversely affect its business, financial
38




condition and results of operations. Any determination that PMI is an investment company under the Investment Company Act similarly could impair its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and thereby impair PFL’s ability to make payments on the Notes. If PFL or PMI were deemed to be an investment company, PFL or PMI may also attempt to seek exemptive relief from the SEC, which could impose significant costs and delays on their businesses.
34


If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Advisers Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.
The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the “Investment Advisers Act,” contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment advisers” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL believes that its business consists of providing a platform for marketplace lending for which investment adviser registration and regulation do not apply under applicable federal or state law, and does not believe that it is required to register as an investment adviser with either the SEC or any of the various states. The SEC or a state securities regulator could reach a different conclusion, however. Registration as an investment adviser could adversely affect PFL’s method of operation and revenues. For example, the Investment Advisers Act requires that an investment adviser act in a fiduciary capacity for its clients. Among other things, this fiduciary obligation requires that an investment adviser manage a client’s portfolio in the best interests of the client, have a reasonable basis for its recommendations, fully disclose to its client any material conflicts of interest that may affect its conduct and seek best execution for transactions undertaken on behalf of its client. It could be difficult for PFL to comply with these obligationsthis obligation without meaningful changes to its business operations, and there is no guarantee that it could do so successfully. If PFL were ever deemed to be in non-compliance with applicable investment adviser regulations, it could be subject to various penalties, including administrative or judicial proceedings that might result in censure, fine, civil penalties (including treble damages in the case of insider trading violations), the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or other adverse consequences. Similarly, any determination by regulators that PMI must register as an investment adviser could materially adversely affect PMI and impair its ability to continue to administer our marketplace on PFL’s behalf.
PMI's administration of Quick Invest under its previous offering and PFL’s administration of Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, and Auto Invest under its current offering, could create additional liability for PFL and such liability could be material.
Quick Invest was a loan search tool that allowed investors to identify Notes that met their investment criteria. An investor using Quick Invest was asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings he or shethey wished to use as search criteria, (ii) the total amount he or shethey wished to invest, and (iii) the amount he or shethey wished to invest per Note. Quick Invest then compiled a basket of Notes for his or hertheir consideration that met his or hertheir search criteria.
Recurring Investment (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) is an automated loan search tool that allows investors to easily invest in Notes that meet their specific investment criteria by automatically bidding any available funds in their account on Notes that match their selected parameters, in accordance with their specified instructions. An investor using Recurring Investment is asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings he or she wishesand term of the Notes they wish to use as search criteria, and (ii) the amount he or she wishesthey wish to invest per Note. If he or she wishes,they wish, the investor can further customize his or hertheir investment criteria by applying one or more of several dozen additional search criteria, such as loan amount, debt-to-income ratio and credit score. The investor can also set aside a specific amount of his or hertheir funds as a cash reserve that will not be invested by the Recurring Investment tool. After the investor has entered and saved the parameters of his or hertheir search, Recurring Investment automatically (i) runs searches on theirthe designated criteria as new listings are posted on the marketplace, and (ii) places bids on any Notes identified by each such search. Currently, the Recurring Investment tool is available only through our website, and is not available through our mobile app, Prosper Invest.
Auto Invest is an automated loan search tool that makes it easier for investors to build their desired portfolio of Notes by automatically investing any available funds in an investor’s account in Notes that match the investor’s specified investment criteria and allocation targets. An investor using Auto Invest is asked to select (i) a loan allocation target, or a target mix of loans based on Prosper Ratings, and (ii) the amount he or she wishesthey wish to invest per Note. The investor has the option of selecting a target from Prosper’s series of preset loan allocations based on the recent historical loan inventory on the marketplace, any of which may be customized by changing the individual allocation targets for each Prosper Rating, or he or shethey can create a custom loan allocation target across Prosper Ratings based on his or hertheir specific risk tolerance. If he or she wishes,they wish, the investor can further customize his or hertheir investment criteria by applying additional filters, such as loan term and employment status. The investor can also set aside a percentage of his or hertheir portfolio as a cash reserve that will not be invested by Auto Invest. Investors may update their target allocations, cash reserve and other investment criteria, and pause and restart Auto Invest, at any time. Once the investor turns on Auto Invest, the tool may immediately begin placing orders for Notes in accordance with the investor’s current and target allocations and other criteria. The mix of Notes in any particular order may not match the investor’s individual loan allocation targets, but over time Auto Invest will place orders so that the aggregate holdings in the investor’s portfolio will approximate, to the extent possible, the allocation specified in his or hertheir investment criteria. For more information about the Auto Invest tool and how it works, see "About the Marketplace—How to Bid to Purchase Notes—Auto Invest."
3539




Since the Notes purchased through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest and Quick Invest are the same as Notes purchased manually, they present the same risks of non-payment as all Notes that may be purchased through our marketplace. For example, there is a risk that a Borrower Loan identified through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest may become delinquent or default, and that the estimated return or historical return (as applicable) for that loan individually, or the estimated return or historical return (as applicable) for the allocation target or the basket of Notes selected by Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest as a whole, may not accurately reflect the actual return on such loan or Notes. If this were to occur, an investor who purchased a Note from PFL through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest could pursue a claim against PFL in connection with its representations regarding the performance of the Borrower Loans bid upon through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest, respectively. An investor could pursue such a claim under various anti-fraud theories under federal and state securities law.
We may face liability under state and federal securities law for statements in our prospectus and in other communications that could be deemed to be an offer to the extent that such statements are deemed to be false or misleading.
Loan listings and other borrower information available on PFL's website as well as in sales and listing reports are statements made in connection with the purchase and sale of securities that are subject to the antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act and the Securities Act. In general, these liability provisions provide a purchaser of the Notes with a right to bring a claim against one or both of us for damages arising from any untrue statement of material fact or failure to state a material fact necessary to make any statements made not misleading. Even though PFL and PMI have advised investors of what they believe to be the material risks associated with an investment in the Notes and PMI management rights, the SEC or a court could determine that they have not advised investors of all of the material facts regarding an investment in the Notes and PMI Management Rights, which could give investors the right to rescind their investment and obtain damages, and could subject PFL and PMI to civil fines or criminal penalties in addition to any such rescission rights or damages.
PMI and PFL’s activities in connection with the offer and sale of securities through our marketplace could result in potential violations of federal securities law and result in material liability to PFL andand/or PMI.
PFL and PMI’s respective businesses are subject to federal and state securities laws that may limit the kinds of activities in which PFL and PMI may engage and the manner in which they engage in such activities. For example, changes to the manner in which PFL offers and sells Notes or other securities through our marketplace could be viewed by the SEC or a state securities regulator as involving the creation or sale of new, unregistered securities. In such circumstances, the failure to register such securities could subject PFL to liability and the amount of such liability could be meaningful. In addition, in 2008, PMI entered into a settlement with the SEC pursuant to which PMI agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations or any future violations of Sections 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act. Failure to comply with that order could result in material civil or criminal liability, which could materially adversely affect PMI’s business and PFL’s offering of Notes.

ItemITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsUNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ItemITEM 2. PropertiesPROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters, including our principal administrative, marketing, technical support and engineering functions, is located in San Francisco, California, where we lease approximately 50,000 square feet of office space under leases that will expire February 28, 2023. We have also have entered into leases for approximately 46,00044,500 square feet of office space located in Arizona and Utah. We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our current needs and that suitable additional alternative spaces will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
36


Item 3.    Legal Proceedings 
Prosper'sOur disclosure set forth under Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies—SEC Inquiry,West Virginia Matter, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
Prosper Funding's disclosure set forth under Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies—SEC Inquiry,West Virginia Matter, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
In March 2021, PMI and PFL accepted service of a complaint via email. PMI, PFL and Velocity Investments, LLC, an accounts receivable management company (“Velocity”), were each named in a purported class action lawsuit brought by two individual plaintiffs in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, filed on February 3, 2021 (the “Jones Litigation”). The complaint asserts, on behalf of the plaintiffs and the class members, claims for violation of certain Maryland state laws and seeks damages. The plaintiffs also seek a declaration of requirement for Maryland licensure and that PMI, PFL, and Velocity did not have the right to collect money from the plaintiffs and the class members on the loan accounts. The Jones Litigation was accompanied by a related petition to stay arbitration and demand declaratory judgement in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland (the “Jones Petition”). On April 21, 2009, PMI and8, 2021, the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”) reached agreement onJones Litigation was removed to the terms of a model consent order between PMI and the states in which PMI, under its initial platform structure, offered promissory notesUnited States District
40




Court for sale directly to investor members prior to November 2008. The consent order involves payment by PMI of up to an aggregate of $1 million in penalties, which have been allocated among the states based on PMI’s promissory note sale transaction volume in each state prior to November 2008. A state that enters into a consent order receives its portion of the $1 million in exchange for its agreement to terminate, or refrain from initiating, any investigation of PMI’s promissory note sale activities prior to November 2008. Penalties are paid promptly after a state enters into a consent order. NASAA has recommended that each state enter into a consent order; however, no state is obliged to do so, and there is no deadline by which a state must make its decision. PMI is not required to pay any portion of the penalty to those states that do not elect to enter into a consent order. If a state does not enter into a consent order, it is free to pursue its own remedies against PMI, subject to any applicable statute of limitations. As of December 31, 2018, PMI has entered into consent orders with 34 states and the District of Maryland (the “Federal District Court”). In March 2021, a similar class action lawsuit, Khan v. Crown Asset Management LLC, was filed in the ColumbiaCircuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland (the “Khan Litigation”) accompanied by a related petition to stay arbitration (the “Khan Petition”). Prosper was not a named defendant in the Khan Litigation or the Khan Petition. In May 2021, the Khan Litigation was removed to the Federal District Court. On July 15, 2021, plaintiff dismissed the Jones Petition but joined PMI, PFL, and has paid an aggregateVelocity to the Khan Petition (the “Combined Petition”). The Combined Petition was removed on July 29, 2021 to the Federal District Court. On March 21, 2022, the Federal District Court issued a ruling to compel arbitration in the Jones Litigation and the Khan Litigation, stay the Combined Petition, and combine all cases. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of $0.78 million in penalties in connection therewith.this matter or estimate the amount of damages, if any, that may be awarded.

ItemITEM 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresMINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PartPART II
ItemITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity SecuritiesMARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information; Holders of Record
There is no established public trading market for PMI's or PFL's common equity. As of December 31, 2018,2021, there were approximately 341358 holders of record of PMI’s common stock. As of December 31, 2018,2021, PMI owns 100% of PFL's membership interests.
Dividend Policy
PMI has not paid cash dividends since inception, and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Item 12 in Part III of this Annual Report for information about securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
In September 2017, PMI issued and sold 37,249,497 shares of PMI's Series G convertible preferred stock. Please see PMI's Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2017 for details regarding the sale.
DuringFor the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, PMI issued 8,200173,356 shares of common stock upon the exercise of warrants for an aggregatestock options at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.15. For the year ended December 31, 2020, PMI issued 687,471 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.02. For the year ended December 31, 2021, PMI issued 3,014,622 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.02. These securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder relative to sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.
37


New Securities Resulting from the Modification of Outstanding Securities
On February 16, 2016, PMI amended and restated its certificate of incorporation to, among other things, effect a 5-for-1 forward stock split.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased(b) Average Price Paid Per Share(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(d) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet by Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1 to October 31— $— — $— 
November 1 to November 31— — — — 
December 1 to December 31— — — — 
Total— $— — $— 
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not repurchase any common and preferred stock.

ItemITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
The following selected historical consolidated financial data of Prosper Marketplace Inc. should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our consolidated financial statements, and the related notes under Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.[Reserved]
3841


 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information)
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net$123,373 $130,174 $95,130 $161,708 $68,229 
Servicing Fees, Net29,025 27,206 28,903 17,238 4,552 
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans13,147 11,431 3,637 14,151 3,227 
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans
(72,316)(60,122)— — — 
Other Revenues4,697 4,806 5,245 7,687 1,828 
Total Operating Revenues97,926 113,495 132,915 200,784 77,836 
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans57,716 47,208 44,649 41,606 42,087 
Interest Expense on Notes(45,886)(43,954)(41,187)(38,174)(38,734)
Net Interest Income11,830 3,254 3,462 3,432 3,353 
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(5,395)(514)(372)59 128 
Total Net Revenues104,361 116,235 136,005 204,275 81,317 
Expenses
Origination and Servicing35,116 34,881 33,944 31,139 14,098 
Sales and Marketing77,997 83,462 70,146 112,284 41,971 
General and Administrative72,371 75,686 102,735 86,480 27,917 
Restructuring Charges1,762 1,340 17,027 — — 
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(45,003)29,140 — — 
Other Expenses, Net1,891 7,392 30,341 — — 
Total Expenses144,134 231,901 254,200 229,903 83,986 
Net Loss Before Taxes(39,773)(115,666)(118,195)(25,628)(2,669)
Income Tax Expense172 (508)546 340 
Net Loss$(39,945)$(115,158)$(118,741)$(25,968)$(2,669)
Excess Return to Preferred Shareholders on Repurchase— — — — (14,892)
Net Loss Applicable to Common Shareholders$(39,945)$(115,158)$(118,741)$(25,968)$(17,561)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted$(0.57)$(1.65)$(1.85)$(0.47)$(0.39)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted70,384,501 69,687,836 64,196,537 55,547,408 44,484,005 
Stock-based compensation included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows (dollar amounts are in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 
Origination and Servicing$911 $996 $2,004 $1231 $104 
Sales and Marketing451 553 2,914 2561 767 
General and Administrative7,039 10,689 14,824 9,219 1,150 
Restructuring— — 45 — — 
Total stock based compensation$8,401 $12,238 $19,787 $13,011 $2,021 

39


As of December 31,
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and Cash Equivalents$57,945 $45,795 $22,337 $66,295 $50,557 
Restricted Cash149,114 152,668 163,907 151,223 81,300 
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value22,173 53,147 32,769 73,187 — 
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value263,522 293,005 315,627 297,273 273,243 
Total Assets753,631 623,735 623,846 685,624 440,158 
Notes at Fair Value264,003 293,948 316,236 297,405 273,783 
Total Liabilities728,304 567,357 512,781 477,056 364,387 
Total Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit25,327 56,378 111,065 208,568 75,771 

Prosper Funding LLC
The following selected historical consolidated financial data of Prosper Funding LLC should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our consolidated financial statements, and the related notes under Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information)
Revenues 
Operating Revenues 
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$105,709 $101,500 $36,630 $57,919 $28,519 
Servicing Fees, Net27,943 25,963 28,604 16,218 4,168 
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(58,027)(48,691)3,637 14,151 3,733 
Other Revenues270 170 478 1,500 — 
Total Operating Revenues75,895 78,942 69,349 89,788 36,420 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans43,569 47,208 44,649 41,380 42,370 
Interest Expense on Notes(40,656)(43,954)(41,187)(38,174)(38,734)
Net Interest Income2,913 3,254 3,462 3,206 3,636 
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(701)(514)(372)59 209 
Total Net Revenues78,107 81,682 72,439 93,053 40,265 
Expenses   
Administration Fee – Related Party70,491 70,359 62,203 62,786 24,966 
Servicing6,140 6,103 5,395 3,705 1,509 
General and Administrative597 379 1,321 1,227 506 
Other Expenses, Net— — 30,704 — — 
Total Expenses77,228 76,841 99,623 67,718 26,981 
Total Net Income (Loss)$879 $4,841 $(27,184)$25,335 $13,284 

40


As of December 31,
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and Cash Equivalents11,163 8,223 6,929 15,026 23,777 
Restricted Cash136,018 140,092 147,983 139,937 73,103 
Borrower Loans Receivable at Fair Value263,522 293,005 315,627 297,273 273,243 
Total Assets433,002 464,045 495,185 475,691 385,240 
Notes at Fair Value264,003 293,948 316,236 297,405 273,783 
Total Liabilities401,757 433,679 463,860 439,386 338,949 

41


ItemITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Prosper’s historical financial statements and related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and Prosper’s actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those included in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2021 and 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020. For discussions related to 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019, see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
Overview
ProsperOur vision is to transform lives by providing affordable financial solutions through the simplest and most trusted platform. We currently offer access to three lending products, each of which supports our vision: (i) unsecured personal loans through a pioneer of onlinepersonal loan marketplace lending thatwhich connects eligible consumer borrowers with individual and institutional investors, (ii) a Credit Card product available to eligible borrowers, and investors. Our goal is(iii) a HELOC product available to enable borrowers to access credit at affordable rates and provide investors with attractive risk-adjusted rates of return.eligible homeowners.
We believe our online marketplacebusiness model has key advantages relative to traditional bank lending,banks, including (i) an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects qualified supply and demand of capital, (ii) online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience, and (iii) datause of advanced technology and technology driven automationartificial intelligence to deliver simple, fast, personalized, and transparent solutions that increases efficiency and improvescan improve consumers’ financial health as they move across the borrower and investor experience.credit spectrum. We do not operate physical branches or incur expenses related to that infrastructure; instead, we use data and technology to drive automation and efficiency in our operations.infrastructure like traditional banks or consumer finance institutions. As part of operating our marketplace, we verify the identity of borrowers and assess borrowers’ credit risk profile using a combination of public and proprietary data. Our proprietary technology automates several loan origination and servicing functions, including the borrower application process, data gathering, underwriting, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection.
During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, our personal loan marketplace facilitated $2.8$1.9 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $2.7$1.7 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 94%88% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. During the quarter ended December 31, 2018,2021, our marketplace facilitated $585$524 million in Borrower Loan originations, of which $543$464 million were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 93%89% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. From inception through December 31, 20182021 our marketplace has facilitated $14.0$20.1 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $12.4$18.0 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 89% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period.
As a credit marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate on our marketplace as borrowers or investors and, consequently, could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Recent Developments
We continue to track the impact of COVID-19 and its variants on our communities, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to 4 monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment may continue as long as the pandemic continues to trigger financial hardship for borrowers.
42



Results of Operations
Key Operating and Financial Metrics (in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Loan Originations$2,836,720 $2,876,055 $2,187,600 
Transaction Fees, Net123,373 130,174 95,130 
Whole Loans Outstanding (1)
3,738,692 3,717,825 3,543,522 
Servicing Fees, Net29,025 27,206 28,903 
Total Net Revenue104,361 116,235 136,005 
Core Revenue (2)
176,677 176,357 136,005 
Net Loss(39,945)(115,158)(118,741)
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
9,448 5,460 (37,991)
(1) Balance as of December 31.
(2) Core Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP Financial measures. For more information regarding these measures and reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”
Overview
The following table summarizesdisplays our net losskey operating and financial metrics for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands):2019:
Year Ended
December 31,
 20182017% Change20172016% Change
Total Net Revenues$104,361 $116,235 (10)%$116,235 $136,005 (15)%
Total Expenses144,134 231,901 (38)%231,901 254,200 (9)%
Net Loss Before Taxes(39,773)(115,666)(66)%(115,666)(118,195)(2)%
Income Tax Expense172 (508)(134)%(508)546 193 %
Net Loss$(39,945)$(115,158)(65)%$(115,158)(118,741)(3)%
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Loan Originations$1,946,974 $1,486,238 $2,666,085 
Transaction Fees, Net$89,364 $67,335 $119,282 
Whole Loans Outstanding (1)
$2,529,814 $2,816,586 $3,659,601 
Servicing Fees, Net$15,024 $18,517 $23,406 
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $153,570 
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,711)
Core Revenue (2)
$144,626 $103,236 $171,123 
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
$12,814 $(8,587)$3,920 
(1) Balance as of December 31
(2) Core Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP Financial measures. For more information regarding these measures and reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
Total net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased 10% when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to an increase of $12.2 million of rebates that were issued to members of the Consortium (as defined in Note 16 of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements) via the issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants that vested during the year ended December 31, 2018. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $87.8 million, a 38% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to a decrease in the fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability of $45.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to a $29.1 million increase in the year ended December 31, 2017 and a $5.5 million decrease in other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. The $5.5 million decrease in other expense was partially driven by impairment charges, which we incurred in the year ended December 31, 2017 (see below for further details). Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $75.2 million, primarily due to the decrease in expenses explained above.Loan Originations
Total loan originations on the platform increased 31% in 2017 over 2016,for the year ended December 31, 2021 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, which resulted in an increase in transaction feesTransaction Fees of 37%33%, or $35.0$22.0 million. Total net revenuesThe loan originations increase for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased approximately $19.8 million, a 15% decrease from2021 versus the year ended December 31, 2016. This2020 was due primarily due to the $60.1 million of rebates that were providedincreased investor demand, lower rates offered to membersborrowers and less restrictive underwriting requirements, which is also reflective of the Consortium viageneral economic recovery since the issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants that vested during the year ended December 31, 2017. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased $22.3 million, a 9% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $27.0 million, restructuring charges of $15.7 million and other expenses of $23.0 million as Prosper continued to realize the cost savings from
43


the restructuring that took place in 2016. These decreases in expenses were offset by a $29.1 million increase in the fair valuestart of the preferred stock warrant liability and a $13.3 million increase in sales and marketing expenses in 2017. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased $3.6 million, a 3% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the decreased expenses experienced in 2017.
Origination VolumeCOVID-19 pandemic.
From inception of the Company through December 31, 2018,2021, a total of 1,095,7891,594,197 Borrower Loans, totaling $14.0$20.1 billion, were originated through our marketplace. DuringFor the year ended December 31, 2018, 211,0842021, 183,041 Borrower Loans totaling $2.8$1.9 billion were originated through our marketplace, as compared to 223,002119,711 Borrower Loans totaling $2.9$1.5 billion originated duringin 2020, which represented a unit increase of 53% and a dollar increase of 31%. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, 119,711 Borrower Loans totaling $1.5 billion were originated through our marketplace, as compared to 195,656 Borrower Loans totaling $2.7 billion originated in 2019, which represented a unit decrease of 5%39% and a dollar decrease of 1%44%.
The decrease in originations Prosper experienced during the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily due to the impact of credit tightening actions focused on borrowers' ability to pay and borrower rate increases in a rising interest rate environment.
Loan origination volume by Prosper Rating was as follows for the periods presented (in millions)millions, except percentage):
Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Amount%Amount%Amount%
AA$351 12 %$197 %$240 11 %
A578 20 %365 13 %459 21 %
B708 25 %641 22 %528 24 %
C732 26 %872 30 %575 26 %
D317 11 %501 17 %259 12 %
E122 %236 %96 %
HR29 %64 %31 %
Total$2,837 $2,876 $2,188 

During 2018,
Year Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Amount%Amount%Amount%
AA$246 13 %$270 18 %$348 13 %
A374 19 %437 29 %639 24 %
B319 16 %311 21 %669 25 %
C246 13 %211 15 %606 22 %
D104 %60 %227 %
E36 %16 %63 %
HR— %— %17 %
Other (1)
621 32 %179 12 %97 %
Total$1,947 100 %$1,486 100 %$2,666 100 %
(1) Represents loans funded through the Prosper platform via the Whole Loan Channel but not assigned Prosper Ratings. These loans are sold only to institutional investors and based on specific underwriting criteria and custom risk models developed by these investors.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the mix of originations on the Prosper platform was relatively higher credit quality whengenerally reflective of less restrictive underwriting standards as compared to 2017,the corresponding period in 2020, as the economy continued to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. There has also been a significant increase in the number and dollar amount of loans not assigned Prosper tightened its credit underwritingratings as the Company continues to reduce borrower defaults across its platform.  sell higher risk loans through the Whole Loan Channel to institutional investors that rely on their own custom risk models to underwrite the loans.
43




Whole Loans Outstanding
We sell Borrower Loans through our Whole Loan Channel, and the outstanding balance of these loans serves as a primary driver of our Servicing Assets. Whole loans outstanding decreased $286.8 million or 10% from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021, and $843.0 million or 23% from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020. These decreases are due primarily to the drop in originations from 2019 to 2020 as a result of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by the increase in originations from 2020 to 2021 discussed above. We have also continued to purchase and hold loans in consolidated warehouse trusts, reducing the balance of outstanding whole loans.
Net (Loss) Income
See the section titled “Results of Operations” below, for the discussion on significant changes in Net (Loss) Income year-over-year.
Results of Operations
RevenuesOverview
The following table summarizes our revenuenet (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016 (dollar amounts2019 (in thousands, except percentage):
Years Ended December 31,
20212020Change% Change20202019Change% Change
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $41,390 40 %$103,236 $153,570 $(50,334)(33)%
Total Expenses282,896 84,669 198,227 n/m84,669 167,181 (82,512)(49)%
Net (Loss) Income Before Income Taxes(138,270)18,567 (156,837)n/m18,567 (13,611)32,178 n/m
Income Tax Expense(71)(16)(55)n/m(16)(100)84 (84)%
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(156,892)n/m$18,551 $(13,711)$32,262 n/m
n/m: not meaningful
Total Net Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $41.4 million, or 40%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to the Change in thousands):Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net, which was a $3.2 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to a $34.2 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2021, a $31.0 million change. The loss in the prior year was largely due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which negatively impacted the fair value of our Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale. Additionally, there was a $22.0 million increase in Transaction Fees, Net, and a $2.4 million increase in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans, both of which were due to the increase in originations during this time. Other Revenues also increased $1.3 million, related primarily to additional credit referral and incentive fee revenue due to increased application volume. These increases were partially offset by a $11.7 million decrease in Total Interest Income (Expense), Net, due primarily to lower outstanding principal balances on securitized Borrower Loans (prior to their deconsolidation from the balance sheet on September 27, 2021), and a $3.5 million decrease in Servicing Fees, Net, as the servicing book of whole loans declined.
Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $198.2 million as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, which is primarily due to a $138.6 million loss from the Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants, which compared to a $37.7 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2021. The loss in 2021 is driven by an increase in the fair value of the underlying Convertible Preferred Stock. Origination and Servicing, Sales and Marketing and General and Administrative expenses increased a combined $20.7 million from the prior year, as costs increased to support the higher origination volume in 2021. Additionally, various cost reductions were achieved in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including lower compensation and professional services costs. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we also recognized a $1.5 million loss related to the deconsolidation of our securitization variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which is more fully discussed in Note 6 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $156.9 million million when compared to the net income generated for the year ended December 31, 2020.
44



Year Ended
December 31,
 20182017% Change20172016% Change
Operating Revenues   
Transaction Fees, Net$123,373 $130,174 (5)%$130,174 95,130 37 %
Servicing Fees, Net29,025 27,206 %27,206 28,903 (6)%
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans13,147 11,431 15 %11,431 3,637 214 %
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(72,316)(60,122)20 %(60,122)— 100 %
Other Revenues4,697 4,806 (2)%4,806 5,245 (8)%
Total Operating Revenues97,926 113,495 (14)%113,495 132,915 (15)%
Interest Income    
Interest Income on Borrower Loans57,716 47,208 22 %47,208 44,649 %
Interest Expense on Notes and Warehouse Line(45,886)(43,954)%(43,954)(41,187)%
Net Interest Income11,830 3,254 264 %3,254 3,462 (6)%
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(5,395)(514)950 %(514)(372)38 %
Total Net Revenues104,361 116,235 (10)%116,235 136,005 (15)%

Revenues
The following table summarizes our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands, except percentage):
Years Ended December 31,
 20212020Change% Change20202019Change% Change
Operating Revenues:   
Transaction Fees, Net$89,364 $67,335 $22,029 33 %$67,335 $119,282 $(51,947)(44)%
Servicing Fees, Net15,024 18,517 (3,493)(19)%18,517 23,406 (4,889)(21)%
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans7,196 4,816 2,380 49 %4,816 10,946 (6,130)(56)%
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans— — — n/a— (17,553)17,553 100 %
Other Revenues3,992 2,711 1,281 47 %2,711 5,953 (3,242)(54)%
Total Operating Revenues115,576 93,379 22,197 24 %93,379 142,034 (48,655)(34)%
Interest Income (Expense):
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale83,107 104,150 (21,043)(20)%104,150 100,786 3,364 %
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments(50,816)(60,127)9,311 (15)%(60,127)(63,736)3,609 (6)%
Total Interest Income (Expense), Net32,291 44,023 (11,732)(27)%44,023 37,050 6,973 19 %
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(3,241)(34,166)30,925 91 %(34,166)(25,514)(8,652)(34)%
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $41,390 40 %$103,236 $153,570 $(50,334)(33)%
Transaction Fees, Net
Prosper earnsWe earn a transaction fee upon the successful origination of all Borrower Loans facilitated through Prosper’sour marketplace. Prosper receivesWe receive payments from WebBank as compensation for the activities Prosper performswe perform on behalf of WebBank. Prosper’sOur fee is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loans that Prosper facilitateswe facilitate on itsour marketplace and WebBank originates. We record the transaction fee revenue net of any fees paid by us to WebBank.  
Transaction fees decreasedFees increased by 5%$22.0 million, or 33%, for the year ended December 31, 20182021, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to a lower average transaction fee of 4.35% for the year ended December 31, 2018, a decrease from 4.53% for the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease in the average transaction fee2020. This increase was due toconsistent with the higher proportion of loans with a Prosper rating of AA being originated on the platform during 2018. These loans have a transaction fee rate that is lower on average.
Transaction fees increased by 37% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to higher origination volume through our marketplace, as describeddiscussed above. The average transaction fee for the year ended December 31, 2017 was 4.53%, an increase from 4.35% for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was due to marketing fee increases implemented in the second quarter of 2016 for certain Prosper Ratings. The marketing fee increases were partially offset by the fair value of the loan trailing fee on loans originated on the platform during the period.
Servicing Fees, Net
We earn a fee from investorsInvestors who purchase Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel fortypically pay us a servicing such loans on their behalf.fee which is generally set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates us for the costs we incurincurred in servicing the Borrower Loans,Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. We record Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenues when received. The servicing fee is generally set at 1% to 1.075% per annumdecrease of the outstanding principal balance of the corresponding Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The increase$3.5 million, or 19%, in servicing fees duringServicing Fees for the year ended December 31, 20182021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to a lower average principal balance of whole loans serviced, which was in turn due primarily to (a) the reduced originations in the prior year as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and (b) an increase in collection fees and higher overallthe average whole loanprincipal balance as comparedof loans held in consolidated warehouse trusts.
We also increased our base market servicing rate from 0.625% to 0.648% in the third quarter of 2021, which further decreased our Servicing Fees, Net balance for the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease in servicing fees for 2017 compared to 20162021. This change was developed with the assistance of a valuation specialist, and was primarily due to the decrease in the average unpaid balanceobservations of Borrower Loans being serviced.increased market servicing compensation rates.
GainSales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing efforts are designed to attract individuals and institutions to our products, encourage their enrollment and participation as users, and facilitate and enhance their understanding and utilization of each product. We employ a wide range of marketing channels to reach potential customers and build our brand and value proposition. These channels include referrals, online marketing, direct mail, partner and affiliate introductions, and email. We are constantly seeking new methods to reach more potential members, while testing and optimizing the end-to-end customer experience.
Origination and Servicing
We have efficient and scalable systems for credit risk assessment, loan underwriting, and servicing. Our risk models take borrowers’ supplied information and combine that information with public and proprietary data to make real time decisions. Our verification agents use several tools to efficiently verify borrower information. Our personal loan servicing platform calculates a loan’s amortization and processes payments received from borrowers and passes such payments on Sale of Borrower Loans
Gain on Sale ofto investors. In addition, we have a back-up servicing agreement with Vervent, Inc. (“Vervent”) (f/k/a First Associates Loan Servicing, LLC), a loan servicing company that is willing and able to assume servicing responsibilities in the event that we are no longer able to service the Borrower Loans consists of net gains onand Notes. Vervent is a financial services company that has entered into numerous successor loan servicing agreements.
Technology
We have made substantial investment in our customer acquisition capability, customer experience, and credit underwriting, loan servicing and payment systems. Our personal loan marketplace utilizes proprietary software to process electronic cash movements, record book entries and calculate cash balances in users’ funding accounts. Electronic deposits and payments are mostly done via Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) transactions. The technology platform allows us to economically acquire and service Borrower Loans sold throughand Notes, and allows WebBank to efficiently originate and fund Borrower Loans.
The system hardware for our personal loan marketplace is located in hosting facilities in Scottsdale, Arizona, Las Vegas, Nevada, The Dalles, Oregon and Council Bluffs, Iowa. We own the Whole Loan Channel.hardware deployed in support of our personal loan marketplace. We continuously monitor the performance and availability of our marketplace. The increase in 2018 comparedinfrastructure is scalable and utilizes standard techniques such as load-balancing and redundancies.
Key aspects of our technology include:
Scalability.Our personal loan marketplace is designed and built as a real-time, highly scalable, multi-tier, redundant system. It incorporates technologies designed to 2017 was due to $3.2 million lessprevent any single point of cash rebates that were issued in 2018 when compared to 2017.    
failure within the data center from taking the entire system offline. This is achieved by utilizing load-balancing technologies at the front end and business layer
4511



The increase
tiers and clustering technologies in 2017 comparedthe back-end tiers to 2016 was dueallow scaling both horizontally and vertically depending on marketplace utilization. 
Data Integrity and Security.We are committed to an increase in loans originated throughprotecting our users' information and we take the platform as described aboveintegrity and $1.9 million less of cash rebates that were issued in 2017 when compared to 2016.    
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans relates to warrants to purchase Series F Convertible Preferred Stock issued to the Consortium that vest when the Consortium purchases whole loans under the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 16security of the accompanying notesdata provided by them very seriously. To that end, we have established data protection policies which are implemented and enforced using the latest technologies. All sensitive information is transmitted on secure channels using SSL technology, with SSL certificates issued by Symantec or DigiCert. We employ principles of least privilege and layered security to PMI's consolidated financial statements) that was signedprotect stored sensitive information. Sensitive information at rest is encrypted using the industry level encryption technologies with appropriate controls to access the data. We protect the network perimeter using the latest technologies including but not limited to firewall and anti-virus threat management techniques. We use strong multi-factor authentication to protect and monitor remote access. We back up all data securely and would expect to recover operations in February 2017. The increasea short period of $12.2 million recognized primarily related to an increasetime in the numberevent of warrantsa disaster. Logging and monitoring of the systems and security controls enables us to ensure that vested during the year endedcontrols are functional and that alerts are triggered on security violations.
Fraud Detection.We employ a combination of proprietary technologies and commercially available licensed technologies and solutions to prevent and detect fraud. These include knowledge-based authentication, behavioral analytics and digital fingerprinting to prevent identity fraud. We use services from third-party vendors for user identification, credit checks and for checking customer names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals and other lists maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). In addition, we use specialized third-party software to augment the identity fraud detection systems. We also have a dedicated team which conducts additional investigations of cases flagged for high fraud risk. Finally, we enable users to report suspicious activity, which we may then evaluate further.
Targeted Risk Assessment. Our AI-driven credit risk models include flags and characteristics which are unique to our platform. We believe this results in a risk assessment that is more targeted and accurate than the traditional lenders, leading to higher approval rates, lower interest rates and highly automated identity and income verification. We are continuing to improve the AI technology embedded within our models to facilitate and improve access to credit and the application experience for borrowers. We have been building and enhancing AI models since 2015 and currently have AI models for underwriting, early payment default, third party fraud, income verification, collections and our direct mail program.
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trade secret, trademark, and other rights, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect our proprietary technology, processes and other intellectual property. We enter into confidentiality and other written agreements with our employees, consultants and service providers, and through these and other written agreements, attempt to control access to and distribution of the software, documentation and other proprietary technology and information. We also utilize a robust multi-layered monitoring program, including third party domain monitoring services, web search engine alerts and our outside counsel, which we leverage to actively enforce our intellectual property rights. Despite these efforts to protect our proprietary rights, third parties may, in an authorized or unauthorized manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain and market or distribute our intellectual property rights or technology or otherwise develop a product with the same functionality. Policing all unauthorized use of intellectual property rights is nearly impossible. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken or will take in the future will prevent misappropriations of our technology or intellectual property rights.
We have registered several trademarks in the United States, including “Prosper,” “FAAS,” “Make Healthcare Affordable,” “Powered by Prosper” and numerous stylized marks, including the Prosper and Prosper Healthcare Lending logos.
We have invested in a research and development program and, as of December 31, 2018.
Other Revenues
Other Revenues consist primarily of securitization fees2021, we had two issued patents and credit referral fees. Credit referral fees are where partner companies pay us an agreed upon amount for referrals of customers from our platform. Securitization fees represent fees Prosper earns to facilitate securitizations for purchasers of borrower loans. The changessix patent applications filed and pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We may file additional patent applications or pursue additional patent protection in this account were not significant.   
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes and Warehouse Line
Prosper recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel using the accrual method based on the stated interest ratefuture to the extent we believe it will be beneficial.
Human Capital Resources
Employee Profile
At Prosper, our mission is to advance financial well-being and our employees are critical to achieving this mission. We are committed to hiring and developing employees who embody our core values: accountability, collaboration, excellence, curiosity, diversity, simplicity, and integrity. As of December 31, 2021, we had 384 full-time employees, all of whom were based in the United States. Our employees are split into the following four functions: 121 in origination and servicing, 20 in sales and marketing, 101 in general and administrative – research and development, and 142 in general and administrative –
12




other. None of our employees are represented by labor unions. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Employee Health & Wellness
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the safety and well-being of our employees and their families has been a top priority as we continue to serve our customers. We transitioned our entire workforce to remote working arrangements and provide a monthly stipend to cover added remote costs. We also keep our employees informed with frequent communications on health and community resources and information along with updates regarding our own response to COVID-19. We continue to monitor and update our practices to remain aligned and ahead of federal, state and local laws, regulations, guidelines and recommendations.
Our employees have access to several programs and benefits related to employee wellness including: traditional life and health (medical, dental, vision) insurance, flexible paid time off, free membership to physical, mental and emotional health resources, and parental leave programs, among others. We have also introduced specific programs and benefits for caregivers during the pandemic including free tutoring for school-aged children. We believe our progressive human resources policies, learning and development, talent acquisition, and community engagement and support activities enable us to attract and retain key personnel.
Employee Recognition and Talent Development
We understand that to attract and retain great people, we must listen to and engage them regularly. We conduct an anonymous, company-wide employee engagement survey twice a year to gauge our progress and identify the areas where we excel and areas for improvement in the employee experience. Following each survey, we identify areas where we would like to focus to support engagement within the company and create action plans to support those initiatives. We have implemented two award programs to recognize and honor our employees who exemplify our values.
Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we require ongoing regulatory and compliance training for our employees. Additionally, we provide a series of leadership training for all people managers. We also offer employees free access to on-demand training on an array of subjects from technical to business management to build the skills and advance their careers as well as opportunities for employees to pursue their passion projects and leadership development in alignment with our values.
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging
Diversity and collaboration are among our company’s core values and we believe our efforts in diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (“DEIB”) fuel our innovation and drive our success. Our goal is to foster a diverse and inclusive workplace where our employees feel that their identities and experiences are represented, embraced and celebrated. We are also committed to our efforts to increase diversity through our hiring practices by using gender-neutral job postings and recruiting policies that promote diverse candidates. We recruit the best people for the job regardless of differences that include gender, ethnicity and other protected traits and it is our policy to comply fully with all federal, state and local laws relating to discrimination in the workplace. We have several employee resource groups that help us to identify opportunities and actions related to DEIB and to better engage underrepresented populations. Our DEIB principles are also reflected in our employee training, and in particular with respect to our policies against harassment and bullying and the elimination of bias in the workplace. We continue to enhance our DEIB policies, with guidance by our executive leadership team.
13




Government Regulation
Overview
The lending and securities industries are highly regulated. Each of the financial products offered by us are subject to extensive and complex rules and regulations. We also are subject to licensing and examination by various federal, state and local government authorities. These authorities impose obligations and restrictions on our activities, WebBank’s activities and the Borrower Loans acquired and Notes issued through our marketplace, Coastal’s activities and the Credit Card product, and Spring EQ and the HELOC product. In particular, these rules may limit the fees that may be assessed, require extensive disclosure to, and consents from, borrowers, prohibit discrimination, and impose multiple qualification and licensing obligations on our activities. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registrations, loss of approved status, voiding of loan contracts, indemnification liabilities to contract counterparties, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions and civil and criminal liabilities. While compliance with such requirements is at times complicated by our novel business model, we believe we are in substantial compliance with these rules and regulations. These rules and regulations are subject to continuous change, however, and a material change could have an adverse effect on our compliance efforts and ability to operate.

From time to time, various types of federal and state legislation are proposed and new regulations are introduced that could result in additional regulation of, and restrictions on, the business of consumer lending. We cannot predict whether any such legislation or regulations will be adopted or how this would affect our business or our important relationships with third parties. In addition, the interpretation of existing legislation may change or may prove different than anticipated when applied to our novel business model. Compliance with such requirements could involve additional costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of consumer lending in the United States, our business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal and state legislation and regulations that may increase the cost of doing business.
Personal Loan State and Federal Laws and Regulations
State Licensing Requirements. In most states we believe that WebBank, as originator of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace, satisfies any relevant licensing requirements with respect to the origination of such Borrower Loans. In addition, as needed, we seek licenses and/or authorizations of various types so that we may conduct activities such as servicing and marketing in all states and the District of Columbia, with the exceptions of Iowa and West Virginia. We are subject to supervision and examination by the state regulatory authorities that administer these state lending laws. The licensing statutes vary from state to state and prescribe or impose different requirements, including: restrictions on loan origination and servicing practices, limits on finance charges and the type, amount and manner of charging fees; disclosure requirements; requirements that licensees submit to periodic examination; surety bond and minimum specified net worth requirements; periodic financial reporting requirements; notification requirements for changes in principal officers, stock ownership or corporate control; restrictions on advertising; and requirements that loan forms be submitted for review.
State Usury Laws. Section 521 of the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (12 U.S.C. § 1831d) (“DIDA”) and Section 85 of the National Bank Act (“NBA”) (12 U.S.C. § 85), federal case law interpreting the NBA such as Tiffany v. National Bank of Missouri and Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First Omaha Service Corporation, and FDIC advisory opinion 92-47 permit FDIC-insured depository institutions, such as WebBank, to “export” the interest rate permitted under the laws of the state where the bank is located, regardless of the usury limitations imposed by the state law of the borrower’s state of residence unless the state has chosen to opt out of the exportation regime. WebBank is located in Utah, and Title 70C of the Utah Code does not limit the amount of fees or interest that may be charged by WebBank on loans of the type offered through our marketplace. Only Iowa and Puerto Rico have opted out of the exportation regime under Section 525 of DIDA and we do not operate in either jurisdiction. However, if a state in which we did operate opted out of rate exportation, we believe that judicial interpretations support the view that such opt outs only apply to loans “made” in those states.  
In May 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC that interpreted the scope of federal preemption under the NBA and held that a nonbank assignee of a loan originated by a national bank was not entitled to the benefits of federal preemption of claims of usury. On November 10, 2015, the defendant in the Madden case filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court for further review of the Second Circuit’s decision. On June 27, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition and refused to review the case, leaving the decision of the Second Circuit intact and binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont. The Madden decision has created some uncertainty as to whether non-bank entities purchasing loans originated by a bank may rely on federal preemption of state usury laws, and may create an increased risk of litigation by plaintiffs challenging our ability to collect interest in accordance with the terms of Borrower Loans. While the decision specifically addressed preemption under the NBA, it could support future challenges to federal preemption for other institutions, including an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank like WebBank. However, although there can be no assurances as to the outcome of any potential
14




litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on our marketplace, we believe the Madden case addressed facts that are not presented by our marketplace lending platform and thus would not apply to Borrower Loans.  
In June 2020, the FDIC issued a final regulation entitled “Federal Interest Rate Authority” that, among other things, addressed the uncertainty resulting from the Madden decision, including uncertainty affecting marketplace lenders that partner with banks. Under the FDIC’s rule, which applies to FDIC-insured state-chartered industrial banks such as WebBank, interest on a loan originated by WebBank that was permissible under DIDA at origination is not affected by WebBank’s subsequent sale of the loan to PFL. Seven states and the District of Columbia sued the FDIC, however, seeking to have the regulation set aside on Administrative Procedure Act grounds. Three states brought a similar challenge in the same court to a similar regulation issued by the OCC under the NBA. Both suits were decided in February 8, 2022, with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruling that the FDIC and OCC had not exceeded their statutory authority when promulgating their respective rules.The court deferred to each federal agency's interpretation, and thus concluded that each agency’s rule was not unreasonable or arbitrary or capricious. The states have until April 11, 2022 to appeal the rulings to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. If the states appeal, a decision by the Ninth Circuit overturning the District Court’s rulings could subject Borrower Loans and PFL purchases from WebBank to state usury laws.
In January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claimed that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator’s lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank each intervened in the state court case filed against Marlette and Avant, respectively. On August 18, 2020, the parties reached a settlement that provides a safe harbor for the Marlette and Avant lending platforms, such that if the lending programs meet certain criteria related to oversight, disclosure, funding, licensing, consumer terms, and structure, the programs will be deemed to be collectible.in compliance with Colorado’s usury limits. On November 9, 2020, we amended our agreements with WebBank to address the requirements of the safe harbor for extending credit to borrowers in Colorado.
If a Borrower Loan made through our marketplace was deemed to be subject to the usury laws of a state that has opted-out of the exportation regime or becomes bound by the Second Circuit’s or a similar judicial decision (including a judicial decision setting aside the FDIC’s regulation governing permissible interest on loans sold by banks to non-banks), we could become subject to fines, penalties, and possible forfeiture of amounts charged to borrowers, and we may decide not to originate Borrower Loans through our marketplace in that applicable jurisdiction, which may adversely impact our growth. For more information, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors—If our marketplace were found to violate a state’s usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.”
State Securities Laws. We recordare subject to the securities laws of each state in which the registration or qualification to offer and sell the Notes and PMI Management Rights has been approved. Certain of these state laws require us to renew the registration or qualification of Notes and PMI Management Rights on an annual basis.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) created many new restrictions and an expanded framework of regulatory oversight for the financial services industry. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protections by creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), which has broad authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth-in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions, such as our issuing bank, for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices” through its regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority. We are subject to the CFPB’s jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority and may become subject to their supervisory authority, as a servicer and acquirer of consumer credit. The CFPB may request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities, and also conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis.
Truth-in-Lending Act. The federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”), and Regulation Z, which implements TILA, require creditors to provide consumers with uniform, understandable information concerning certain terms and conditions of their loan and credit transactions. These rules apply to WebBank as the creditor for Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace, but because the transactions are carried out on our hosted website, we facilitate compliance at WebBank’s direction. For closed-end credit transactions of the type provided through our marketplace, these disclosures include providing the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, the amount financed, the number of payments and the amount of the monthly payment. The creditor must provide the disclosures before the Borrower Loan is closed. TILA also regulates the advertising of credit and gives borrowers, among other things, certain rights regarding updated disclosures and the treatment of credit
15




balances. Our marketplace provides borrowers with a TILA disclosure prior to the time a Borrower Loan is originated. We also seek to comply with TILA’s disclosure requirements related to credit advertising.
Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”) prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, or the fact that all or part of the applicant’s income derives from any public assistance program or the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act or any applicable state law. Regulation B, which implements ECOA, restricts creditors from requesting certain types of information from applicants and from making statements that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application. These requirements apply both to lenders such as WebBank and other parties like us that regularly implement and communicate credit decisions. Investors may also be subject to the ECOA in their capacity as purchasers of Notes, if they are deemed to regularly participate in credit decisions. In the underwriting of Borrower Loans on our marketplace, both WebBank and we seek to comply with ECOA’s provisions prohibiting discouragement and discrimination. ECOA also requires creditors to provide consumers with timely notices of adverse action taken on credit applications. WebBank and we provide prospective borrowers who apply for a Borrower Loan through our marketplace but are denied credit with an adverse action notice which is in compliance with applicable requirements (see also below regarding “Fair Credit Reporting Act”).
Fair Credit Reporting Act. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and its implementing regulations, including Regulation V, promote the accuracy, fairness and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. FCRA requires a permissible purpose to obtain a consumer credit report, and requires persons to report loan payment information to credit bureaus accurately. FCRA also imposes disclosure requirements on creditors who take adverse action on credit applications based on information contained in a credit report. WebBank and we have a permissible purpose for obtaining credit reports on potential borrowers and WebBank and we also obtain explicit consent from borrowers to obtain such reports. As the servicer for the Borrower Loan, we have systems in place to report Borrower Loan payment and delinquency information to appropriate reporting agencies. We provide an adverse action notice to a rejected borrower on WebBank’s behalf at the time the borrower is rejected that includes all the required disclosures. We have also implemented an identity theft prevention program as required by law.  
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and its implementing regulation, Regulation F, provide guidelines and limitations on the conduct of third-party debt collectors in connection with the collection of consumer debts. The FDCPA limits certain communications with third parties, imposes notice and debt validation requirements, and prohibits threatening, harassing or abusive conduct in the course of debt collection. We are not a “debt collector” under the FDCPA, which the statute defines as a person who regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed or due, or asserted to be owed or due, to another. The CFPB retained the statute’s “debt collector” definition in its November 2020 final rules implementing the FDCPA. As the servicer for Borrower Loans originated by WebBank and owned by investors, we are not a debt collector based on our facilitation of loans in the origination process and/or its servicing of the Borrower Loans after the time of origination and prior to any default. While the FDCPA applies to third-party debt collectors, debt collection laws of certain states impose similar requirements on creditors who collect their own debts. Our agreement with our investors prohibits investors from attempting to collect directly on the Borrower Loan. We use our internal collection team and professional external debt collection agents to collect delinquent accounts. They are required to comply with all other applicable laws in collecting delinquent accounts of our borrowers.  
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties. The SCRA, as well as certain state laws with similar protections for military members, require us to adjust the interest expenserate of borrowers who qualify for and request relief. If a borrower with an outstanding Borrower Loan qualifies for protection under the SCRA or similar state laws, we will reduce the interest rate on the Borrower Loan to 6% for the duration of the borrower’s active duty. During this period, the investors who have invested in such Borrower Loan will not receive the difference between 6% and the Borrower Loan’s original interest rate. For a borrower to obtain an interest rate reduction on a Borrower Loan due to military service, we require the borrower to send us a written request and written documentation of active duty. We do not take military service into account in assigning Prosper Ratings to borrower loan requests and we do not disclose the military status of borrowers to investors.  
Military Lending Act. The federal Military Lending Act (“MLA”) provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions. Although originally enacted in 2006, the MLA applies to persons engaged in the business of extending consumer credit subject to the disclosure requirements of the TILA and Regulation Z with respect to loans made on or after October 3, 2016. The MLA prohibits creditors from imposing a Military Annual Percentage Rate (“MAPR”) greater than 36% in any consumer credit transaction involving a covered borrower. It also requires certain oral and written disclosures to be provided to covered borrowers. Additionally, the MLA prohibits creditors from requiring covered borrowers to waive rights to legal recourse, submit to arbitration, or pay a prepayment penalty or fee. Both we and WebBank have ensured that the loan program complies with the MLA requirements for covered borrowers,
16




including but not limited to the restriction on MAPR, the delivery of required disclosures and the prohibition of mandatory arbitration and waiver of legal recourse.
Other Lending Regulations. We are subject to and seek to comply with other state and federal laws and regulations applicable to consumer lending, including additional requirements relating to loan disclosure, credit discrimination, credit reporting, debt collection and unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices. These laws and regulations may be enforced by state consumer credit regulatory agencies, state attorneys general, the CFPB and private litigants, among others. Given our novel business model and the subjective nature of some of these laws and regulations, particularly laws regulating unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices, we may become subject to regulatory scrutiny or legal challenge with respect to our compliance with these requirements.
Electronic Funds Transfer Act. The federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”), and Regulation E, which implements it, provide guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts. In addition, transfers performed by ACH electronic transfers are subject to detailed timing and notification rules and guidelines administered by the National Automated Clearinghouse Association (“NACHA”). Most transfers of funds in connection with the origination and repayment of the Borrower Loans are performed by ACH. We obtain necessary electronic authorization from borrowers and investors for such transfers in compliance with such rules. Transfers of funds through our marketplace are currently executed by Wells Fargo and conform to the EFTA, its regulations and NACHA guidelines.  
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act/Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (“ESIGN”) and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“UETA”), authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures. ESIGN and UETA require businesses that want to use electronic records or signatures in consumer transactions to obtain the consumer’s consent to receive information electronically. When a borrower or individual investor registers with our marketplace, we obtain his or her consent to transact business electronically and maintain electronic records in compliance with ESIGN and UETA requirements.  
Privacy and Data Security Laws. The federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) limits the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information. Additional state and federal privacy and data security laws require safeguards to protect the privacy and security of consumers’ personally identifiable information, require notification to affected customers in the event of a breach, and restrict certain sharing of nonpublic personal information about a consumer with affiliated entities. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020, provides consumers in the state with rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by businesses that are a certain size or that generate at least half of their revenue by selling personal information. In turn, the CCPA requires subject businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for timely responding to consumer requests submitted in exercise of their rights under the statute, although the CCPA includes certain exceptions for personal information that is protected under GLBA or other federal and state privacy laws. We maintain a detailed privacy policy that is designed to address GLBA and the CCPA and is accessible from our website. These provisions of the CCPA will be further strengthened by provisions of the California Privacy Rights Act that will become operative January 1, 2023. We maintain security measures designed to protect participants’ personal information, and we do not sell, rent or share such information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes unless previously agreed to by the participant or otherwise permitted by applicable law. In addition, we take a number of measures to safeguard the personal information of our borrowers and investors and to protect it against unauthorized access.  
Bank Secrecy Act. In cooperation with WebBank, we have implemented an anti-money laundering policy and various anti-money laundering procedures to comply with applicable federal law. With respect to new borrowers and investors, we apply the customer identification and verification program rules and screen names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Asset Control’s (“OFAC”) pursuant to the USA PATRIOT Act amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) and its implementing regulation.
Credit Card State and Federal Laws and Regulations
The Credit Card product operates under a similar bank partnership model as our personal loan marketplace, whereby through the application of Section 521 of DIDA, Section 85 of the NBA, and federal case law, Coastal may “export” the interest rate permitted under the laws of the State of Washington, where Coastal is located, regardless of the usury limitations imposed by the state law of the cardholder’s state of residence unless the state has chosen to opt out of the exportation regime. State privacy and data security laws, including the CCPA, also apply to the Credit Card product.
The Credit Card product is subject to the same federal laws and regulations applicable to our personal loan marketplace and as summarized above, including the Dodd-Frank Act, TILA, ECOA, FCRA, FDCPA, SCRA, MLA, EFTA, ESIGN, UETA, GLBA, BSA and OFAC. TILA and Regulation Z contain specific disclosure requirements for credit cards and
17




advertising rules for credit cards. Please refer to the “Government Regulations—Personal Loan State and Federal Laws and Regulations” section above for a summary of these federal laws and regulations. Certain amendments to TILA also govern the Credit Card product, including the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (the “CARD Act”), which amended TILA to prescribe, among other things, additional procedures, disclosures, fee limits, and other protections for consumers applying for or holding credit cards, and the Fair Credit Billing Act (“FCBA”), which governs creditor obligations with respect to billing complaints and errors. For the Credit Card product, we take a similar approach to compliance for our personal loan marketplace, with adjustments for application of the rules to open-ended, unsecured credit cards as opposed to closed-end personal loans.We work with Coastal to facilitate compliance.
HELOC State and Federal Laws and Regulations
The HELOC product is subject to many of the same federal laws and regulations as the personal loan marketplace, including the Dodd-Frank Act, TILA, ECOA, FCRA, ESIGN, GLBA, BSA and OFAC. TILA and Regulation Z contain specific disclosure requirements for HELOCs and mortgage advertising rules.State mortgage broker and mortgage lender licensing and registration requirements also apply to the HELOC product, which must satisfy the minimum standards set forth in the federal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 and Regulation H, as well as state usury laws. State privacy and data security laws, including the CCPA, also apply to the HELOC product.
The HELOC product is also subject to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”) and its implementing regulation, Regulation X, as well as related guidance issued by the CFPB and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). RESPA, among other things, prohibits the payment or acceptance of referral fees or kickbacks, or any splitting of fees except for actual services performed. The TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure does not apply to HELOCs. The RESPA and Regulation X mortgage servicing rules do not apply to HELOCs.
Finally, the HELOC product is subject to the data collection and reporting requirements of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (the “HMDA”) and its implementing regulation, Regulation C. Prosper is not directly subject to the HMDA data collection and reporting requirements, but collects data to support the reporting requirements applicable to its financial institution partner.
Foreign Laws and Regulations
We do not permit non-U.S. based individuals to register as borrowers on our marketplace and the marketplace does not operate outside the United States. Therefore, we do not believe that our marketplace is subject to foreign laws or regulations.
Summary of Risk Factors
We are subject to various risks, the most significant of which are summarized below. For more information about these and other risks that may affect us, you should carefully read the factors described in the “Risk Factors” section below.

Risks related to personal loan borrower default

The Notes are risky and speculative investments for suitable investors only.
Payments on the Notes depend entirely on payments PFL receives on corresponding Borrower Loans. If a borrower fails to make any payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan related to a Note, payments on such Note will be correspondingly reduced. If payments on the Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note become more than 30 days overdue, such investor will be unlikely to receive the full principal and interest payments that were expected on the Note.
Borrowers may not view or treat their obligations to PFL as having the same significance as loans from traditional lending sources.
The credit information of an applicant may be inaccurate or may not accurately reflect the applicant’s creditworthiness, which may cause an investor to lose all or part of the price paid for a Note. The fact that we have the exclusive right and ability to investigate claims of identity theft in the origination of Borrower Loans creates a significant conflict of interest between us and our investors.
The Borrower Loans are not secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by any third party, and investors must rely on us or a third-party collection agency to pursue collection against any borrower.
The Prosper Rating may not accurately set forth the risks of investing in the Notes, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will come within the estimated average annualized loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating, and investors have limited rights to cause Prosper to repurchase the Notes.
We may not set appropriate interest rates for Borrower Loans.
Investors who use the Recurring Investment or Auto Invest tools may face additional risk of funding Borrower Loans that have been erroneously selected by the tool.
18




The Borrower Loans do not restrict borrowers from incurring additional unsecured or secured debt, nor do they impose any financial restrictions on borrowers during the term of the Borrower Loan, which may reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the full principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a Note.
In general, the Borrower Loans do not contain any cross-default or similar provisions. If a borrower defaults on any of his or her other debt obligations, our ability to collect on the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment may be substantially impaired.

Risks Inherent in investing in the Notes

The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL only and are not directly secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by PMI or any third party.
PFL is not obligated to indemnify Note holders or repurchase Notes except in limited circumstances.
Our marketplace allows a borrower to prepay a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. Borrower Loan prepayments will extinguish or limit an investor’s ability to receive additional interest payments on a Note.
We may choose or be required to implement payment and collections relief programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies or crises, which may extend or otherwise alter the repayment schedule of Borrower Loans and reduce the expected return on the corresponding Notes.
The Notes will not be listed on any securities exchange and can be held only by registered Prosper investors. Further, no trading platform for the transfer of Notes exists. Therefore, investors should be prepared to hold the Notes they purchase until maturity.
Our participation in the funding of Borrower Loans could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest.

Risks related to PFL and PMI, our marketplace and our ability to service the notes

We have experienced errors on our platform that have resulted in incorrect reporting of performance returns to Note investors. If we are unable to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors, investors could be adversely impacted.
Arrangements for back-up servicing are limited. If PMI fails to maintain operations or the Administration Agreement is rejected or terminated (in bankruptcy or otherwise), investors may experience a delay and increased cost in respect of their expected principal and interest payments on Notes, and PFL may be unable to collect and process repayments from borrowers.
PMI, in its capacity as servicer, has the authority to waive or modify the terms of a Borrower Loan without the consent of the Note holders.
We have incurred operating losses in prior years and may continue to incur net losses in the future.
PFL relies on a third-party commercial bank to process transactions. If PFL is unable to continue utilizing these services, its business and ability to service the Notes may be adversely affected.
Any significant disruption in service in our marketplace or in PMI’s computer systems could adversely affect PMI’s ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement. If the security of PFL’s investors’ and borrowers’ confidential information stored in our systems is breached, users’ secure information may be stolen, our reputations may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liability.

Risks related to compliance and regulation

Our marketplace represents a novel approach to borrowing and investing that may fail to comply with federal and state securities laws, borrower protection laws and the state counterparts to such consumer protection laws. Borrowers may dispute the enforceability of their obligations under borrower or consumer protection laws after collection actions have commenced, or otherwise seek damages under these laws. Investors may attempt to rescind their Note purchases under securities laws. Regulatory agencies and their state counterparts may investigate our compliance with these regulatory obligations, and may take enforcement action with respect to alleged law violations. There continues to be uncertainty as to how the actions of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or any other new agency could impact our business or that of our issuing bank. If our marketplace were found to violate a state’s usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed. If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Company Act or the Investment Advisers Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected. Several lawsuits have sought to recharacterize certain loan marketers and other originators as lenders. If litigation or a regulatory enforcement action on similar theories were successful against one or both of PMI and PFL, Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace could be subject to state consumer protection laws and licensing requirements in a greater number of states.
We rely on agreements with WebBank, pursuant to which WebBank originates loans to qualified borrowers on a uniform basis throughout the United States and sells and assigns those loans to PFL. If our relationship with WebBank were to end, we may need to rely on individual state lending licenses to originate Borrower Loans.
19




PMI's administration of Quick Invest under its previous offering and PFL’s administration of Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, and Auto Invest under its current offering, could create additional liability for PFL and such liability could be material.
Recent Developments
COVID-19
We continue to track the impact of COVID-19 and its variants on our communities, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to 4 monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment may continue as long as the pandemic continues to trigger financial hardship for borrowers.
Available Information
The following filings are available for download free of charge at www.prosper.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such filings are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC’s website, at www.sec.gov. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, when evaluating our business. Any of the following risks, either alone or taken together, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. While we believe the risks and uncertainties described below include all material risks currently known by us, it is possible that these may not be the only ones we face.
RISKS RELATED TO PERSONAL LOAN BORROWER DEFAULT
The Notes are risky and speculative investments for suitable investors only.
Investors should be aware that the Notes offered through our marketplace are risky and speculative investments. The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL and depend entirely for payment on PFL’s receipt of payments under the corresponding Borrower Loans. Notes are suitable only for investors of adequate financial means. If an investor cannot afford to lose the entire amount of such investor’s investment in the Notes, the investor should not invest in the Notes.
Payments on the Notes depend entirely on payments PFL receives on corresponding Borrower Loans. If a borrower fails to make any payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan related to a Note, payments on such Note will be correspondingly reduced.
PFL will only make payments pro-rata on a series of Notes after it receives a borrower’s payment on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of servicing fees. PFL also will retain from the funds received from the relevant borrower and otherwise available for payment on the Notes any non-sufficient funds fees and the amounts of any attorneys’ fees or collection fees our in-house collections department, a third-party servicer or collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts. Under the terms of the Notes, if PFL does not receive any or all payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan, payments on the Note will be correspondingly reduced in whole or in part. If the relevant borrower does not make a payment on a specific monthly loan payment date, no payment will be made on the Note on the corresponding succeeding Note payment date.
The Borrower Loans are not secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by any third party, and investors must rely on us or a third-party collection agency to pursue collection against any borrower.
Borrower Loans are unsecured obligations of borrowers. They are not secured by any collateral, and they are not guaranteed or insured by PFL, PMI or any third party, or backed by any governmental authority in any way. We and our third-party collection agencies will, therefore, be limited in our ability to collect on Borrower Loans. Moreover, Borrower Loans are obligations of borrowers to PFL as successor to WebBank, not obligations to the holders of Notes. Holders of the Notes will
20




have no recourse to the borrowers and no ability to pursue borrowers to collect payments under Borrower Loans. Holders of the Notes may look only to PFL for payment of the Notes. Furthermore, if a borrower fails to make any payments on the Borrower Loan, the holders of the Notes corresponding to that Borrower Loan will not receive any payments on their Notes. The holders of such Notes will not be able to pursue collection against the borrower and will not be able to obtain the identity of the borrower in order to contact the borrower about the defaulted Borrower Loan.
The credit information of an applicant may be inaccurate or may not accurately reflect the applicant’s creditworthiness, which may cause an investor to lose all or part of the price paid for a Note.
We obtain applicant credit information from consumer reporting agencies, and assign Prosper Ratings to listings based in part on the applicant’s credit score. A credit score that forms a part of the Prosper Rating assigned to a listing may not reflect the applicant’s actual creditworthiness because the credit score may be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. Similarly, the contractual interest rates.credit data taken from the applicant’s credit report and displayed in listings may also be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. We do not verify the information obtained from the applicant’s credit report. Moreover, investors do not, and will not, have access to financial statements of applicants or to other detailed financial information about applicants.
The Prosper Rating may not accurately set forth the risks of investing in the Notes, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will come within the estimated average annualized loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating, and investors have limited rights to cause Prosper to repurchase the Notes.
The Prosper Rating assigned to a loan listing may not accurately reflect the risks of investing in the Notes, and is not a recommendation by us to buy or hold a Note. For example, the Prosper Rating for a listing could be inaccurate because the applicant’s credit report contained incorrect information. Similarly, although some of the information provided by applicants that is relevant to the Prosper Rating is verified by us before calculating the Prosper Rating, we do not verify all such information. For example, we do not verify the income or employment information on all applications. Further, the Prosper Rating does not reflect PFL’s credit risk as a debtor (such credit risk exists even though, as the debtor on the Notes, PFL’s only obligation is to pay to the Note holders their pro-rata shares of collections received on the related Borrower Loans net of applicable fees). In addition, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will fall within the expected loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating. The interest rate chargedrates on the Notes might not adequately compensate Note investors for these additional risks.
If we include in a listing a Prosper Rating that is different from the Prosper Rating calculated by us or calculate the Prosper Rating for a listing incorrectly, and such error materially and adversely affects a holder’s interest in the related Note, PFL will indemnify the holder or repurchase the Note. PFL will not, however, have any indemnity or repurchase obligation under the Amended and Restated Indenture, the Notes, the Investor Registration Agreement or any other agreement associated with the Note Channel as a result of any other inaccuracy with respect to a listing’s Prosper Score or Prosper Rating. PFL’s contractual repurchase obligations do not affect a Note holder’s rights under federal or state securities laws.
Investors who use the Recurring Investment or Auto Invest tools may face additional risk of funding Borrower Loans that have been erroneously selected by the tool.
Since it was first implemented in July 2011 through December 31, 2021, the Recurring Investment (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) tool has experienced programming errors that affected 8,630 Notes and PMI Notes out of the 11,999,556 Notes and PMI Notes purchased. The Auto Invest tool was first implemented on June 2, 2016. Since such time through December 31, 2021, the Auto Invest tool has experienced programming errors that affected 2 Notes out of the 8,583,286 Notes purchased.
In the event of any errors in Recurring Investment or Auto Invest that cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note such investor would have purchased had there been no error, PFL will either repurchase the Note, indemnify the investor against losses suffered on that Note or cure such error. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to PFL and PMI, Our Marketplace and Our Ability to Service the Notes” for more information.
Some borrowers may use our marketplace to defraud investors, which could adversely affect investors’ ability to recoup their investment.
We use identity and fraud checks with external databases to authenticate each borrower’s identity. There is a risk, however, that these checks could fail and fraud may occur. In addition, applicants may misrepresent their intentions regarding loan purpose or other information contained in listings, and we do not verify the majority of this information. While PFL will indemnify an investor or repurchase Notes in limited circumstances (including, e.g., a material payment default on the Borrower Loan resulting from verifiable identity theft), it is not obligated to indemnify an investor or repurchase a Note from an investor if the investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud (other than verifiable identity theft) in connection with a loan listing, or due to false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a listing, whether in credit data, a borrower’s
21




representations, similar indicators of borrower intent and ability to repay the Borrower Loan. If PFL repurchases a Note, the repurchase price will be equal to the Note's outstanding principal balance and will not include accrued interest. If PFL repurchases any Notes, PMI will concurrently repurchase the related PMI Management Rights for zero consideration.
The fact that we have the exclusive right and ability to investigate claims of identity theft in the origination of Borrower Loans creates a significant conflict of interest between us and our investors.
We have the exclusive right to investigate claims of identity theft and determine, in our sole discretion, whether verifiable identity theft has occurred. Such a determination of verifiable identity theft may trigger an obligation by PFL to either repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans or indemnify the applicable Note holders. The denial of a claim under PFL’s identity theft guarantee would save PFL from its indemnification or repurchase obligation. Because investors rely solely on us to investigate incidents that might require PFL to indemnify the applicable Note holders or repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans, a conflict of interest exists between us and such investors.
If payments on the Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note become more than 30 days overdue, such investor will be unlikely to receive the full principal and interest payments that were expected on the Note, and such investor may not recover the original purchase price on the Note.
We may refer Borrower Loans that become past due to a third party collection agency for collection or we may collect on such Borrower Loans directly. If a borrower fails to make a required payment on a Borrower Loan within 30 days of the due date, we will pursue reasonable collection efforts in respect of the Borrower Loan. Referral of a delinquent Borrower Loan to a collection agency within five business days after it becomes 30 days past due will be considered reasonable collection efforts. If payment amounts on a delinquent Borrower Loan are received from a borrower after the loan has been referred to our in-house collections department or an outside collection agency, we or that collection agency may retain a percentage of that payment as a fee before any principal or interest becomes payable to an investor. Collection fees may be up to 40% of recovered amounts, in addition to any legal fees and transaction fees associated with accepting payments incurred in the collection effort.
For some non-performing Borrower Loans, we may not be able to recover any of the unpaid loan balance and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive little, if any, of the unpaid principal and interest payable under the Note. In all cases, investors must rely on our collection efforts or the applicable collection agency to which such Borrower Loans are referred, and are not permitted to collect or attempt collection of payments on the Borrower Loans in any manner.
Loss rates on the Borrower Loans may increase as a result of economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of the borrower, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Borrower Loan loss rates may be significantly affected by economic downturns or general economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of individual borrowers. In particular, loss rates on Borrower Loans may increase due to factors such as prevailing interest rates, the rate of unemployment, the level of consumer confidence, residential real estate values, the value of the U.S. dollar, energy prices, changes in consumer spending, the number of personal bankruptcies, disruptions in the credit markets, natural disasters, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and other factors.
The Borrower Loans do not restrict borrowers from incurring additional unsecured or secured debt, nor do they impose any financial restrictions on borrowers during the term of the Borrower Loan, which may reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the full principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a Note.
If a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted, the additional debt may impair the ability of that borrower to make payments on his or her Borrower Loan and, as such, reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a corresponding Note. Moreover, the additional debt may adversely affect the borrower’s creditworthiness generally, 1% higherand could result in the financial distress, insolvency, or bankruptcy of the borrower. To the extent that the borrower has or incurs other indebtedness and cannot pay all of his or her indebtedness, the borrower may choose to make payments to other creditors, rather than to PFL.
To the extent borrowers incur other indebtedness that is secured, such as a mortgage, a home equity line or an auto loan, the ability of the secured creditors to exercise remedies against the assets of the borrower may impair the borrower’s ability to repay the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment. Borrowers may also choose to repay obligations under secured indebtedness or other unsecured indebtedness before repaying Borrower Loans because there is no collateral securing the Borrower Loans. An investor will not be notified if a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted.
22




Borrowers may be more likely to incur additional unsecured or secured debt in an effort to mitigate economic disruption, which may further reduce their likelihood of repaying Borrower Loans.
The economic disruption caused by inflation, issues in the supply chain of goods, and changes in the labor market due to the global spread of COVID-19 have affected both consumers and small businesses, self-employed individuals and independent contractors whose livelihoods depend on providing in-person goods and services.
In response to the global spread of COVID-19, in March 2020 Congress enacted and the president signed into law the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The relief measures provided by these laws include expanding eligibility criteria for Small Business Administration loan programs. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic and legislation passed in response to the pandemic result in borrowers incurring additional debt above and beyond ordinary levels, borrowers’ overall ability to repay Borrower Loans may be further impaired.
Borrowers may not view or treat their obligations to PFL as having the same significance as loans from traditional lending sources.
The investment return on the Notes depends on borrowers fulfilling their payment obligations in a timely and complete manner under the corresponding Borrower Loan. Borrowers may not view marketplace lending obligations originated through our marketplace as having the same significance as other credit obligations arising under more traditional circumstances. If a borrower neglects his or her payment obligations on a Borrower Loan upon which payment of an investor’s Note is dependent or chooses not to repay his or her Borrower Loan entirely, such investor may not be able to recover any portion of the investment in a Note.
Our marketplace may fail to comply with applicable law, which could limit our ability to collect on Borrower Loans.
The Borrower Loans are subject to federal and state consumer protection laws. Our marketplace may not always be, and may not always have been, in compliance with these laws. Failure to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements applicable to our marketplace may, among other things, limit our or a collection agency's ability to collect all or part of the principal of or interest on Borrower Loans.
We regularly review the requirements of these laws and take measures aimed at ensuring that the Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace meet the requirements of all applicable laws. However, determining compliance with all applicable laws is a complex matter and it is possible that our determination may be inaccurate or incorrect. Also, changes in law, either due to court decisions, regulatory interpretations or rulings, or new legislation, may adversely affect the collectability of a Borrower Loan.
In general, the Borrower Loans do not contain any cross-default or similar provisions. If a borrower defaults on any of his or her other debt obligations, our ability to collect on the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment may be substantially impaired.
The Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions. A cross-default provision makes a default under certain debt of a borrower an automatic default on other debt of that borrower. Because the Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions, a Borrower Loan will not be placed automatically in default upon that borrower’s default on any of the borrower’s other debt obligations. If a borrower defaults on debt obligations owed to a third party and continues to satisfy the payment obligations under the Borrower Loan, the third party may seize the borrower’s assets or pursue other legal action against the borrower before the borrower defaults on the Borrower Loan, which may affect our ability to collect from the borrower when or if the Borrower Loan becomes delinquent.
Borrowers may seek the protection of debtor relief under federal bankruptcy or state insolvency laws, which may result in the nonpayment of an investor’s Notes.
Borrowers may seek protection under federal bankruptcy law or similar laws. If a borrower files for bankruptcy (or becomes the subject of an involuntary petition), a stay will go into effect that will automatically put any pending collection actions on the Borrower Loan on hold and prevent further collection action absent bankruptcy court approval. If we receive notice that a borrower has filed for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws, or has become the subject of an involuntary bankruptcy petition, we will put the borrower’s account into “bankruptcy status.” When this occurs, we terminate automatic monthly ACH debits on the Borrower Loan and we will not undertake collection activity without bankruptcy court approval. Whether any payment will ultimately be made or received on a Borrower Loan after a bankruptcy status is declared depends on the borrower’s particular financial situation. In most cases, however, unsecured creditors such as PFL receive nothing, or only a fraction of their outstanding debt and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive none or very little of the unpaid principal and interest payable on the Note.
Federal law entitles borrowers who enter active military service to an interest rate cap and certain other rights that may inhibit the ability to collect on Borrower Loans and reduce the amount of interest paid on the corresponding Notes.
23




Federal law provides borrowers on active military service with rights that may delay or impair our ability to collect on a Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) and other similar state laws require that the interest rate on preexisting debts, such as Borrower Loans, be set at no more than 6% while the qualified service member or reservist is on active duty. A holder of a Note that is dependent on such a Borrower Loan for payment will not receive the difference between 6% and the original stated interest rate for the Borrower Loan during any such period. The SCRA also permits courts to stay proceedings and the execution of judgments against service members and reservists on active duty, which may delay recovery on any Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments on the corresponding Notes.
Beginning October 3, 2016, the Military Lending Act (“MLA”) prohibits requiring covered borrowers, which include active military servicemembers and their dependents, to waive the right to legal recourse or to submit to arbitration. This may delay recovery on any relevant Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments on the corresponding Notes.
If there are any amounts under such a Borrower Loan still due and owing to PFL after the final maturity of the corresponding Notes, PFL will have no further obligation to make payments on such Notes, even if it receives payments on the Borrower Loan after the final maturity of such Notes. We do not take military service into account in assigning a Prosper Rating to loan listings. In addition, as part of the borrower registration process, we do not request borrowers to confirm if they are qualified service members or reservists within the meaning of the SCRA or the MLA. See Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information.
As of December 31, 2021, 76 Borrower Loans, with a total outstanding balance of $0.6 million are subject to the SCRA.
The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.
The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule, which in certain circumstances permits borrowers to assert any claims and defenses that they would have had against a seller of goods or services obtained with the proceeds of a loan against an originator or subsequent purchaser of the loan, could allow certain borrowers to raise such defenses against PFL to the extent of the outstanding loan balance. If such defenses are successfully raised, PFL will be unable to collect on the loan and it is unlikely that any further payment will be made on the corresponding Notes.
The death of a borrower may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.
If a borrower dies with an outstanding Borrower Loan, PFL is required, upon receiving notice of the death, to stop accepting automatic loan payments and to refund any payments that were automatically debited after the borrower's date of death. Though we may seek to work with the executor of the borrower’s estate to obtain repayment of the loan, the borrower’s estate may not contain sufficient assets to repay the loan, or its executor may prioritize repayment of other creditors. In addition, if a borrower dies near the end of the term of his or her Borrower Loan, the time required for the probate of the borrower’s estate will likely extend beyond the Notes’ final maturity date, after which date PFL will cease to have any obligation to make payments on the Notes.
RISKS INHERENT IN INVESTING IN THE NOTES
The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL only and are not directly secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by PMI or any third party.
The Notes will not represent an obligation of borrowers, PMI or any other party except PFL, and are special, limited obligations of PFL. The Notes are not guaranteed or insured by PMI, any governmental agency or instrumentality, or any third party. Although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in the Borrower Loans corresponding to compensate usthe Notes, the payments and proceeds that PFL receives on such Borrower Loans, the bank account in which such Borrower Loan payments are deposited, and the accounts in which investors’ funding amounts are deposited, the Note holders do not themselves have a direct security interest in the Borrower Loans or the right to payment thereunder. If an event of default under the Amended and Restated Indenture were to occur, the Note holders would be dependent on the indenture trustee’s ability to realize on the collateral and make payments on the Notes in the manner contemplated by the Amended and Restated Indenture. In addition, although PFL will take all actions that it believes are required under applicable law to perfect the security interest of the indenture trustee in the collateral, if its analysis of the required actions is incorrect or if it fails to take any required action in a timely manner, the indenture trustee’s security interest may not be effective and holders of the Notes could be required to share the collateral (and any proceeds thereof) with PFL’s other creditors, or, if a bankruptcy court were to order the substantive consolidation of PMI and PFL (as described below), PMI’s creditors.
PFL is not obligated to indemnify Note holders or repurchase Notes except in limited circumstances.
24




PFL is only obligated to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes in limited circumstances. These circumstances include if (i) a material payment default under the corresponding Borrower Loan occurs as a result of verifiable identify theft; (ii) we include a Prosper Rating in a listing that is different from the Prosper Rating we calculated, or we calculate the Prosper Rating incorrectly; or (iii) any errors in Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, or Auto Invest cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note, in which cases PFL also has the option to cure such error. PFL is not required to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes, however, if the Note holder’s investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud other than verified identity theft, or due to other false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a listing, whether in credit data, borrower representations or similar indicia of borrower intent and ability to repay the loan. Further, PFL is under no obligation to repurchase a Note or indemnify any holder of Notes if a correctly determined Prosper Rating fails to accurately predict the actual losses on a Borrower Loan.
PFL might incur indemnification and repurchase obligations that exceed its projections, in which case it may not have sufficient liquidity to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations.
PFL believes its liquidity will be sufficient to meet its reasonably anticipated indemnification and repurchase obligations. In determining its expected liquidity needs with respect to indemnification and repurchase obligations, PFL considers the history of such obligations incurred by it and PMI. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that if PFL is obligated to repurchase a Note or indemnify a Note holder, that it will be able to meet its repurchase or indemnification obligations. If PFL is unable to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations with respect to a Note, the investor in such Note may lose all of such investor’s investment in the Note.
Our marketplace allows a borrower to prepay a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. Borrower Loan prepayments will extinguish or limit an investor’s ability to receive additional interest payments on a Note.
Borrower Loan prepayment occurs when a borrower decides to pay some or all of the principal amount on a Borrower Loan earlier than originally scheduled. Borrowers may decide to prepay all or a portion of the remaining principal amount due under a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. In the event of a prepayment of the entire remaining unpaid principal amount of a Borrower Loan, each of the holders of the Notes corresponding to the Borrower Loan will receive his or her share of such prepayment but further interest will not accrue on such Borrower Loan or on such Note after the date on which the payment is made. If the borrower prepays a portion of the remaining unpaid principal balance, the term of the Borrower Loan will not change, but interest will cease to accrue on the prepaid portion. If a borrower prepays a Borrower Loan in whole or in part, an investor will not receive all of the interest payments that such investor originally expected to receive on the Note corresponding to such Borrower Loan. In addition, such investor may not be able to find a similar rate of return on another investment at the time at which the Borrower Loan is prepaid. Prepayments are subject to PFL’s servicing fee, even if the prepayment occurs immediately after issuance of a Note.
Prevailing interest rates may change during the term of the Notes. If this occurs, investors may receive less value from the purchase of Notes in comparison to other ways they may invest their money. Additionally, borrowers may prepay their Borrower Loans due to changes in interest rates, and investors may not be able to redeploy the amounts received from prepayments in a way that offers the return expected from the Notes.
The Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for servicingpayment bear fixed, not floating, rates of interest. If prevailing interest rates increase, the interest rates on Notes investors purchase might be less than the rate of return they could earn if they had invested the purchase price in a different investment.
We may not set appropriate interest rates for Borrower Loans.
We set interest rates for all Borrower Loans based on Prosper Ratings, as well as additional factors such as Borrower Loan terms, the economic environment and competitive conditions. If we set interest rates for Borrower Loans too low, investors may not be compensated appropriately for the level of risk that they are assuming in purchasing Notes, while setting the interest rate too high may increase the risk of non-payment. In either case, a failure by us to set rates appropriately may adversely impact the ability of investors to receive returns on their Notes that are commensurate with the risks they have assumed in acquiring such Notes.
The increase duringNotes will not be listed on any securities exchange and can be held only by registered Prosper investors. Further, no trading platform for the transfer of Notes exists and there can be no assurance a trading platform for the transfer of Notes will develop in the future. Therefore, investors should be prepared to hold the Notes they purchase until maturity.
The Notes and PMI Management Rights will not be listed on any securities exchange and all Notes and PMI Management Rights must be held by registered Prosper investors. Further, in connection with the termination of our relationship with FOLIO Investments, Inc. in October 2016, a trading platform for the transfer of Notes and PMI Management Rights no longer exists. While we may, in our sole discretion, permit the establishment of another platform on which a secondary market may be made with respect to the Notes, there can be no assurance a trading platform for the Notes and PMI
25




Management Rights will develop in the future. Therefore, Note purchasers must be prepared to hold their Notes and PMI Management Rights to maturity.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Notes are uncertain.
There are no statutory provisions, regulations, published rulings or judicial decisions that directly address the characterization of the Notes or instruments similar to the Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, although the matter is not free from doubt because payments on the Notes are dependent on payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan, PFL treats the Notes as debt instruments that have original issue discount (“OID”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Where required, PFL intends to file informational returns with the IRS in accordance with such treatment unless there is a change or clarification in the law, by regulation or otherwise, that would require a different characterization of the Notes. Investors should be aware, however, that the IRS is not bound by PFL’s characterization of the Notes and the IRS or a court may take a different position with respect to the Notes’ proper characterization. For example, the IRS could determine that, in substance, each investor owns a proportionate interest in the corresponding Borrower Loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes or, for example, the IRS could instead treat the Notes as a different financial instrument (including an equity interest or a derivative financial instrument). Any different characterization could significantly affect the amount, timing, and character of income, gain or loss recognized in respect of a Note. For example, if the Notes are treated as PFL’s equity, (i) PFL would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income, including interest, accrued on the corresponding Borrower Loans but would not be entitled to deduct interest or OID on the Notes, and (ii) payments on the Notes would be treated by the Note holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes as dividends (that may be ineligible for reduced rates of U.S. federal income taxation or the dividends-received deduction) to the extent of PFL’s earnings and profits as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A different characterization may significantly reduce the amount available to pay interest on the Notes. Investors are strongly advised to consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the Notes (including any possible differing treatments of the Notes).
PFL’s ability to pay principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability to match the timing of its income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Investors should be aware that PFL’s ability to pay principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to match the timing of income it receives from a corresponding Borrower Loan that it holds and the timing of deductions that it may be entitled to in respect of payments made on the Notes that it issues. For example, if the Notes are treated as contingent payment debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes but the corresponding Borrower Loans are not, there could be a potential mismatch in the timing of PFL’s income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and PFL’s resulting tax liabilities could affect its ability to make payments on the Notes.
Our participation in the funding of Borrower Loans could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest.
As is the practice with other marketplace lending companies, from time to time, we may fund portions of qualified loan requests in our marketplace and hold any Notes purchased as a result of such funding for our own individual accounts. Even though we will participate in funding Borrower Loans listed in our marketplace under the same terms and conditions and through the use of the same information that is made available to other potential investors in our marketplace, such participation may be perceived as involving a conflict of interest. For example, our funding of a Borrower Loan may cause the loan to fund, and in some cases, fund faster, than it would fund in the absence of our participation, which could benefit us to the extent that it ensures that we generate the revenue associated with the loan.
During the year ended December 31, 20182021, we purchased $0.1 million in Notes for investment.
We may choose or be required to implement payment and collections relief programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies or crises, which may extend or otherwise alter the repayment schedule of Borrower Loans and reduce the expected return on the corresponding Notes.
The global spread of COVID-19 has caused significant market volatility and workforce disruptions. We recognize the serious economic hardship triggered by COVID-19, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to 4 monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months total and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. We are also complying with new state mandates that may temporarily impact collections activity with respect to delinquent loans.
Our COVID-19 payment relief programs may impact the repayment schedule and terms of Borrower Loans and the returns received on corresponding Notes. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment and subsequent loan performance may fluctuate as long as the pandemic continues to trigger increased work stoppages and unemployment.
26




Likewise, to the extent we are required to comply with state mandates to pause collections activity on delinquent loans, investors will not receive recoveries on any Notes corresponding to Borrower Loans that cannot be collected upon while such mandates are in effect. We continue to actively monitor the impact of COVID-19 on economic conditions.   
RISKS RELATED TO PFL AND PMI, OUR MARKETPLACE AND OUR ABILITY TO SERVICE THE NOTES
We have experienced errors on our platform that have resulted in incorrect reporting of performance returns to Note investors. If we are unable to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors, investors could be adversely impacted.
In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors, which resulted from errors in the code forming part of our calculation framework. On average, the error resulted in Note investors being shown annualized net return information that was approximately 260 basis points higher than the actual performance of Notes in their accounts. The error did not affect any other part of Note investors’ accounts, nor did it affect any other aspects of the platform, including the receipt and distribution of loan payments, deposits, monthly statements or tax documentation, or the Note and loan level information provided to investors. Following an SEC investigation, we entered into a settlement with the SEC to resolve the matter on April 19, 2019. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a negligence-based violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. PFL paid the penalty in full on April 24, 2019.
The error reveals a risk associated with the complex programs, algorithms and inputs that support our platform. We depend on these programs, algorithms and inputs to store, retrieve, process and manage data, as well as to provide marketplace features such as our credit assessments and underwriting, the Prosper Rating, historical returns, and individual Note, Note portfolio and platform-wide performance data. Errors or other design defects within these programs, algorithms and inputs may result in a negative experience for borrowers and investors, delay introductions of new features or enhancements, or impact the information displayed on our website. They could also result in negative publicity and unfavorable media coverage, harm to our reputation, litigation, regulatory inquiries or proceedings, loss of or damage to our relationships with borrowers or investors, or loss of revenue or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Arrangements for back-up servicing are limited. If PMI fails to maintain operations or the Administration Agreement is rejected or terminated (in bankruptcy or otherwise), investors may experience a delay and increased cost in respect of their expected principal and interest payments on Notes, and PFL may be unable to collect and process repayments from borrowers.
If the Administration Agreement (or the loan servicing provisions thereof) are terminated for any reason (whether as a result of PMI’s bankruptcy, non-performance or otherwise), PFL would attempt to transfer the loan servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and Notes to a third party pursuant to its contractual agreements with investors.
PFL has entered into a back-up servicing agreement with a loan servicing company that is willing and able to transition servicing responsibilities from PMI. There can be no assurance, however, that this back-up servicer will be able to adequately perform the servicing of the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes. If this back-up servicer assumes the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes, the back-up servicer may impose additional servicing fees (up to the maximums we have negotiated), reducing the amounts available for payments on the Notes. Additionally, transferring these servicing obligations to the back-up servicer may result in delays in the processing of collections on Borrower Loans and information with respect to amounts owed on Borrower Loans. If the back-up servicer is not able to service the Borrower Loans and Notes effectively, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on their Notes may be substantially impaired, even if their portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the corresponding Borrower Loans are paying on schedule.
In addition, it is unlikely that the back-up servicer would be able to perform functions other than servicing the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, such as facilitating the creation of new Borrower Loans through our marketplace, or managing PFL’s marketing efforts. PFL believes that it could find one or more other parties who could perform these and any other functions necessary to fully operate our marketplace in the absence of PMI. However, this process, and any related onboarding of such party or parties, will take time. Any such delay or impairment that does not affect existing Note holders, because PFL or its back-up servicer proves able to continue servicing outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, could nonetheless delay PFL’s ability to facilitate the origination of new Borrower Loans and issue new Notes through our marketplace, which could adversely affect PFL’s finances and customer relationships.
A decline in economic conditions may adversely affect our customers, which may negatively impact our business and results of operations.
As a lending marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to
27




participate in our marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect our business and results of operations. For more information about risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic, see “—Public health emergencies and other events beyond our control may damage our ability to continue operations without disruptions, including our ability to attract new borrowers and investors, retain existing investors, as well as the ability of existing borrowers to repay their loans. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.”
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace.
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace. If these investors cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our personal loan marketplace and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our business could be adversely affected by a weakening market for securities backed by consumer assets.
PFL is involved in the securitization market through: (i) its business of selling loans to investors who, in turn, sell asset backed securities based on accumulated loan portfolios and (ii) securitization of loans retained by affiliates of PFL. If the market for asset backed securities based on consumer assets weakens, investors may cease or significantly decrease their funding of Borrower Loans through our marketplace and if PFL has been unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding, if this were to occur, the rights of holders of the Notes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited, suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder on a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.
Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if this were to occur, the recovery, if any, of a holder of a Note may be substantially delayed in time (for example, due to the imposition of a stay on payments by the bankruptcy court) and may be substantially less in amount than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note even if a Note holder’s portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the Borrower Loans are paying on schedule. Further, although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in all of the Borrower Loans, in all payments and proceeds it receives on the corresponding Borrower Loans and in the bank account in which the Borrower Loan payments are deposited, the holders of the Notes would still be subject to risks associated with PFL’s insolvency, bankruptcy or a similar proceeding.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, borrowers may delay payments or cease making payments at all.
Borrowers may delay or suspend making payments to PFL because of the uncertainties associated with PFL becoming subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, even if the borrowers have no legal right to do so, and such delay would reduce, at least for a time, the funds that might otherwise be available to pay the Notes corresponding to those Borrower Loans. In addition, the commencement of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding may, as a matter of law, prevent PFL from making regular payments on the Notes, even if the funds to make such payments are available. Because the Indenture trustee would be required to enforce its security interest in the Borrower Loans in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, the Indenture trustee's ability to make payments under the Notes would be delayed, which may effectively reduce the value of any recovery that a holder of a Note may receive (and no such recovery can be assured) by the time any recovery is available.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, interest accruing on the Notes upon and following such bankruptcy or similar proceeding may not be paid.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, interest accruing on the Notes during the proceeding may not be part of the allowed claim of a holder of a Note. If the Note holder receives a recovery on the Note (and no such recovery can be assured), any such recovery may be based on, and limited to, the Note holder’s claim for principal and for interest accrued up to the date of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding, but not thereafter. Because a bankruptcy or similar proceeding may take months or years to complete, a claim based on principal and on interest only up to the start of the bankruptcy or similar
28




proceeding may be substantially less than a claim based on principal and on interest through the end of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, a Note holder may not have any priority right to payment from the corresponding Borrower Loan, may not have any right to payment from funds in the applicable servicing account, and may not have any ability to access funds in the applicable funding accounts (the “FBO Funding accounts”).
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if PFL has failed to perfect the security interest in Borrower Loans, investors may be required to share the proceeds of the Borrower Loans upon which their Notes are dependent for payment with PFL’s other creditors, including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans. To the extent that proceeds of the Borrower Loans would be shared with PFL’s other creditors, any secured or priority rights of such other creditors may cause the proceeds to be distributed to such other creditors before any distribution is made to investors on the corresponding Notes.
If a payment is made on a Borrower Loan corresponding to a Note before PFL’s bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, and those funds are held in the servicing account PFL maintains with Wells Fargo to collect borrower payments and have not been used by PFL to make payments on the Note as of the date the bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, there can be no assurance that PFL will or will be able to use such funds to make payments on such Note. Other creditors of PFL (including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans) may be deemed to have rights to such funds or interests in the applicable servicing account and monies credited thereto that are equal to or greater than the rights of the holder of such Note.
Although PFL believes that amounts funded by both Whole Loan Channel and Note Channel investors into the applicable FBO Funding accounts should not be subject to claims of its creditors other than the investors for whose benefit the funds are held, the legal title to the FBO Funding accounts, and the attendant right to administer the FBO Funding accounts, would be property of PFL’s bankruptcy estate. As a result, if PFL were to file for bankruptcy protection, the legal right to administer the funds in the FBO Funding accounts would vest with the bankruptcy trustee or debtor in possession. In that case, while neither PFL nor its creditors should be able to reach those funds, the indenture trustee or the investors may have to seek a bankruptcy court order lifting the automatic stay and permitting them to withdraw their funds. Investors may suffer delays in accessing their funds in the FBO Funding accounts as a result. Moreover, United States bankruptcy courts have broad powers at law and in equity and, if PFL has failed to properly segregate or handle investors’ funds, a bankruptcy court could determine that some or all of such funds were beneficially owned by PFL and should therefore be made available to PFL’s creditors generally.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, a holder of a Note may be delayed or prevented from enforcing PFL’s repurchase obligations with respect to such Note.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, any right of a Note holder to require PFL to repurchase the Note or indemnify such Note holder under the circumstances set forth in the Investor Registration Agreement or the Note might not be enforceable, and such holder’s claim for such repurchase may be treated less favorably than a general unsecured obligation of PFL.
Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PFL were substantively consolidated in this manner, the rights of the holders of the Notes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited, suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder on a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.
Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PMI became subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding and PFL were substantively consolidated with PMI, the risks described in the immediately preceding risk factors regarding (i) payment delays, (ii) uncollectability of interest accrued during the bankruptcy proceeding, (iii) being subordinated to the interests of PFL’s other creditors, and (iv) the indenture trustee’s inability to access funds in the deposit account or the FBO Funding accounts, would all be present and, in addition, the same considerations would apply in relation to the claims of creditors of PMI, including that such creditors of PMI may be determined to have perfected security interests or unsecured claims that take precedence over or are at least equal in priority to those of creditors of PFL (including holders of Notes).
In addition, in the event of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PMI, (i) the implementation of back-up servicing arrangements may be delayed or prevented, and (ii) PMI’s ability to transfer its servicing obligations to a back-up servicer or its other corporate and marketplace administration services and marketing services to third parties may be limited and subject to the approval of the bankruptcy court or other presiding authority. The bankruptcy process may delay or prevent the implementation of back-up servicing, which may impair the collection on Borrower Loans to the detriment of Note holders.
PMI owns and did not transfer to PFL ownership of the computer hardware that it uses to host and maintain the website or agreements with third parties relating to the hosting and maintenance of the website. Although PMI’s retention of
29




such hardware and agreements should not bear on a bankruptcy court’s analysis of the legal separateness of PMI and PFL (or their respective assets and liabilities), the cessation of or substantial reduction of the day-to-day operations of PMI (because of or during its bankruptcy or otherwise) would materially impair and delay the ability of PFL or a back-up service provider to retrieve data and information in the possession of PMI and to operate our marketplace or elements thereof relevant to Borrower Loan and Note servicing.
PMI, in its capacity as servicer, has the authority to waive or modify the terms of a Borrower Loan without the consent of the Note holders.
Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PMI is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to service and collect on the Borrower Loans in accordance with industry standards. Subject to that obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to waive or modify any non-material term of a Borrower Loan, consent to the postponement of strict compliance with any such term, or in any manner grant a non-material indulgence to any borrower. In addition, if a Borrower Loan is in default, or PMI determines a default is reasonably foreseeable or that such action is consistent with its servicing obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to waive or modify a material term of a Borrower Loan, to accept payment of an amount less than the principal balance in final satisfaction of a Borrower Loan and to grant any indulgence to a borrower, provided that PMI has reasonably and prudently determined that such action will not be materially adverse to the interests of the relevant Note holders. If PMI approves a modification to the terms of any Borrower Loan it must promptly notify the corresponding Note holders in each Note holder's account.
There can be no assurance that PMI, in its capacity as servicer, will be able to collect the principal amount or interest rate agreed to and/or sell charged off Borrower Loans in the future as a result of business, regulatory or other considerations.
We have incurred operating losses in prior years and may continue to incur net losses in the future.
We have incurred operating losses in prior years and may continue to incur net losses in the future. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we incurred a loss of $138.3 million and generated income of $18.6 million, respectively. Additionally, from our inception through December 31, 2021, we have had an accumulated deficit of $554.3 million.
We have financed our operations to date primarily with proceeds from the sale of equity securities. At December 31, 2021, we had approximately $67.7 million unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. PMI is dependent upon raising additional capital or debt financing to fund its current operating plan if it cannot generate sufficient positive cash flow from operations. PMI’s failure to achieve positive cash flow from operations or obtain sufficient debt and equity financing, could adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.
Although our business has grown, we may be unable to manage our growth effectively and meet the demands that such growth places on our facilities, employees and infrastructure.  
As the number of borrowers, investors and Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace increases, PMI will need to increase its facilities, personnel and infrastructure in order to continue performing effectively its obligations under the Administration Agreement and to accommodate the effects that such growth will have on our servicing and marketplace needs. PMI must constantly add new hardware and update its software and our personal loan marketplace, expand customer support services, and add new employees to maintain the operations of our personal loan marketplace as well as to satisfy its servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and the Notes and its other obligations under the Administration Agreement. If PMI is unable to increase the capacity of our marketplace and maintain the necessary infrastructure to perform its duties under the Administration Agreement, PFL, or one or more other third-party service providers engaged by PFL, will have to perform the duties otherwise performed by PMI, and investors may experience delays in receipt of payments on their Notes and periodic downtime of our marketplace.
The Credit Card and HELOC products are new products which are complex and require us to allocate significant resources to the development, launch and growth of these new products. If these new products are unable to attract borrowers and generate revenue, our business and results of operations could suffer.
The HELOC product was launched in March 2019 and our Credit Card product was launched in December 2021. The launch of these new and complex products requires us to allocate significant resources in hiring new employees to support each product, ensuring each product complies with new laws and regulations, and integrating the products into our online platform. See Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information about the laws and regulations which affect the Credit Card and HELOC products. There is no guarantee that we will attract the borrowers necessary to generate sufficient revenue to recoup the investment of resources into the development, launch, and growth of these new products. The products may also divert management’s time and effort from other initiatives.
Our Credit Card product is also subject to the risk of fraud or borrower identity theft and we may experience losses on, or inability to recoup losses resulting from, fraudulent Credit Card applications or fraudulent transactions made on Credit
30




Cards. Our Credit Card product is currently focused on higher risk borrowers, who may have higher exposure to economic downturns and general economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of these borrowers. As a result, we may experience significant delinquency rates and fraud and credit losses. Our borrower profile and recent entry into the credit card market could increase these risks and potential losses.
The Credit Card and HELOC products are not available on our personal loan marketplace for investment purposes. The Credit Card and HELOC products did not have a material impact on our revenue as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021.
PFL’s reliance on PMI or other third-party service providers, lack of employees, limited operating history, and capitalization levels could make it difficult to operate at a sustainable level.
PFL was formed in 2012 as a limited purpose vehicle. Under the Administration Agreement, PFL receives a license fee from PMI for granting PMI a non-exclusive, worldwide license to access and use our marketplace. In addition, PFL earns servicing fees in relation to the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes that it retains from collections on the Borrower Loans. PFL believes this fee income is sufficient to cover its reasonably anticipated obligations. While PFL believes that it is adequately capitalized to meet its foreseeable obligations, and that its fee income is sufficient to meet its ongoing operating costs, its financial resources are limited and could prove to be insufficient. In addition, PFL has no employees and relies on PMI, as servicer, or other third-party service providers, to perform most of its day-to-day operations. The lack of PFL’s own employees, its limited operating history, and capitalization that is less than that of PMI could make it difficult for PFL to operate at a level that will be sustainable. Absent the services to be provided to PFL by PMI pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PFL's risk management process, ability to predict loss rates and the general operation of our marketplace would have a smaller margin for error than does PMI.
The market in which we participate is competitive and, if we do not compete effectively, our operating results could be harmed.
The consumer lending market is competitive and rapidly changing. With the introduction of new technologies and the influx of new entrants, we expect competition to persist and intensify in the future, which could harm our ability to increase volume in our marketplace.
Our principal competitors include banking institutions, credit unions, credit card issuers, mortgage lenders, consumer finance companies, and online lending platforms. Competition could result in reduced volumes, reduced fees or the failure of our marketplace to achieve or maintain more widespread market acceptance, any of which could harm our business. In addition, in the future we may experience new competition including companies possessing large, existing customer bases, substantial financial resources and established distribution channels. If any of these companies or any major financial institution decides to enter our online lending sector, acquire one of our existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one of our competitors, our ability to compete effectively could be significantly compromised and our operating results could be harmed.
Most of our current or potential competitors have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their marketplaces and distribution channels. Our potential competitors may also have longer operating histories, more extensive customer bases, greater brand recognition and broader customer relationships than we have. These competitors may be better able to develop new products, to respond quickly to new technologies and to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns. Our industry is driven by constant innovation. If we are unable to compete with such companies and meet the need for innovation, the use of our marketplace could stagnate or substantially decline.
If we fail to promote and maintain our brand in a cost-effective manner, we may lose market share and our revenue may decrease.
To succeed, we must increase transaction volumes in our marketplace by attracting a large number of borrowers and investors in a cost-effective manner. If we are not able to attract qualified borrowers and sufficient investor purchase commitments, we will not be able to increase our transaction volumes. PFL believes that developing and maintaining awareness of its brand in a cost-effective manner is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our marketplace and attracting new borrower and investors. Furthermore, we believe that the importance of brand recognition will increase as competition in our industry increases. Successful promotion of our brand will depend largely on the effectiveness of marketing efforts and the user experience on our marketplace. These brand promotion activities may not yield increased revenues. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand, we may lose our existing users to competitors or be unable to attract new users, which would cause our revenue to decrease and may impair our ability to maintain our marketplace.
The proprietary technology that makes operation of our marketplace possible is not fully protected by patents. It may be difficult and costly for PFL to protect its intellectual property rights in relation thereto, or to continue to develop or obtain new technologies, which could adversely affect its ability to operate competitively.
31




On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred ownership of the marketplace, including the proprietary technology and all of the rights related to the operation of the marketplace, to PFL. PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace depends, in part, upon this proprietary technology. We have taken steps to protect our proprietary interests in such technology, including through patent filings, and intend to continue to vigorously protect these interests. Despite our best efforts, however, we may not protect the proprietary technology effectively, which would allow competitors to duplicate our products and adversely affect our ability to compete. A third party may attempt to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use the proprietary technology without PFL’s consent. In addition, our marketplace may infringe upon claims of third-party patents and PFL or PMI may face intellectual property challenges from such other parties. PFL or PMI may not be successful in defending against any such challenges or in obtaining licenses to avoid or resolve any intellectual property disputes. Furthermore, the technology may become obsolete, and there is no guarantee that PFL will be able to successfully develop, obtain or use new technologies to adapt our marketplace to compete with other companies. If PFL cannot protect the proprietary technology embodied in and used by our marketplace from intellectual property challenges, or if our marketplace becomes obsolete, PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace and perform its servicing obligations could be adversely affected and, in such event, its ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.
PFL relies on a third-party commercial bank to process transactions. If PFL is unable to continue utilizing these services, its business and ability to service the Notes may be adversely affected.
Because PFL is not a bank, it cannot belong to or directly access the Automated Clearing House (ACH) payment network. As a result, it currently relies on an FDIC-insured depository institution to process its transactions. If PFL cannot continue to obtain such services from this institution or elsewhere, or if it cannot transition to another processor quickly, its ability to process payments will suffer and investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes will be delayed or impaired.
If the security of PFL's investors' and borrowers' confidential information stored in our systems is breached or otherwise subjected to unauthorized access, users' secure information may be stolen, our reputations may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liability.
As with any entity with a significant Internet presence, we and the third parties that we use for website hosting and mobile technologies occasionally have experienced cyber-attacks, breaches of our and their systems and other similar incidents, which to-date have not had a material effect on our business, operations or reputation. Future attacks are likely to occur. Our marketplace stores PFL’s investors’ and borrowers’ bank information and other personally identifiable sensitive data. Any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access could cause users’ secure information to be stolen and used for criminal purposes. Security breaches or unauthorized access to secure information could also expose us to liability related to the loss of the information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and negative publicity. If security measures are breached because of third-party action, employee or contractor error, malfeasance, faulty password management or otherwise, or if design flaws in the relevant software are exposed and exploited, and, as a result, a third party or disaffected employee obtains unauthorized access to any investors’ or borrowers’ data, PFL’s relationships with its users could be severely damaged, and PFL (or PMI) could incur significant liability. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we and PMI’s third-party hosting facilities may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. In addition, many states have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving their personal data. These mandatory disclosures regarding a security breach are costly to implement and often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may cause our users to lose confidence in the effectiveness of PFL’s and PMI’s data security measures. Further, California has recently enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, a comprehensive bill that affords individuals in the state affected by data breaches a private right of action against companies that have allegedly been the target of such breaches due to a failure to implement and maintain appropriate cybersecurity policies and procedures. Any security breach, whether actual or perceived, would harm our reputations, and we could lose users.
In addition, we face an increased risk of cyber-attacks during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has forced us and many other companies to institute remote work protocols in order to protect the health and safety of employees. We use industry standard technologies to maintain secure remote work protocols and protect sensitive data within our control, and we require employees to complete security awareness training at regular intervals. However, we are necessarily limited in our ability to control or ensure the security of networks that employees use to work remotely. Further, cybersecurity experts and officials are reporting increased phishing, spoofing and other cyber-attack efforts during COVID-19, as hackers seek to take advantage of the uptick in remote work.
Any significant disruption in service in our marketplace or in PMI’s computer systems could adversely affect PMI’s ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement.
PMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement could be materially and adversely affected by events outside of its control. The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of PMI's technology and its
32




underlying network infrastructure are important to our respective operations, level of customer service, reputation and ability to attract new users and retain existing users. PMI's system hardware is hosted in several hosting facilities located in Las Vegas, Nevada; Scottsdale, Arizona; The Dalles, Oregon; and Council Bluffs, Iowa. Our hosting facilities service providers do not guarantee that access to our marketplace or to PMI's own systems will be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. The operation of our marketplace and PMI's operation of its own systems depends on our service providers' ability to protect the relevant systems in their facilities against damage or interruption from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality, temperature, humidity or other environmental concerns, computer viruses or other attempts to harm them, criminal acts and similar events. As noted above, there is an increased risk of cyber-attacks during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has forced many companies to implement remote work protocols and resulted in greater attempts by malicious actors to carry out cyber-attacks. If PMI's arrangement with any hosting facilities service provider is terminated, or there is a lapse of service or damage to such provider's facilities, PMI could experience interruptions in providing its services under the Administration Agreement, PFL could experience interruptions in the operations of our marketplace, and both could experience delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities. Any interruptions or delays in PMI’s performance of its services or in the functioning of and accessibility of our marketplace, whether as a result of a hosting facility service provider or other third-party error, PMI's error, natural disasters or security breaches, whether accidental or willful, could harm PFL’s relationships with users and its reputation. Additionally, in the event of damage or interruption, PMI's insurance policies may not be sufficient for PMI to adequately compensate PFL for any losses that it may incur. PMI's disaster recovery plan has not been tested under actual disaster conditions, and PMI may not have sufficient capacity to recover all data and services in the event of an outage at one or more hosting facilities. These factors could prevent PMI from processing or posting payments on the Borrower Loans or the Notes, damage PFL's brand and reputation, divert the attention of PMI's employees, reduce PFL's revenue, subject PMI or PFL to liability and cause users to abandon our marketplace, any of which could adversely affect our respective businesses, financial condition and results of operations. 
Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions.
Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions. If a hacker were able to infiltrate our marketplace, users would be subject to the increased risk of fraud or borrower identity theft and may experience losses on, or delays in the recoupment of amounts owed on, a fraudulently induced purchase of a Note. Additionally, if a hacker were able to access our secure files, they might be able to gain access to users’ personal information. While we have taken steps to prevent such activity from affecting our marketplace, if we are unable to prevent such activity, the value of investors’ investment in the Notes could be adversely affected.
Competition for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees we need to perform under the Administration Agreement.
Competition for highly skilled technical and financial personnel is extremely intense. We may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at compensation levels consistent with our existing compensation and salary structure. Many of the companies with which we compete for experienced employees have greater resources than we do and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.
In addition, we invest significant time and expense in training our employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek to recruit them. If we fail to retain our employees, we could incur significant expenses in hiring and training their replacements and the quality of our services and our ability to serve borrower and investors could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect on PMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired. See Item 1, “Business—Human Capital Resources” for more information about Prosper’s employees.
Purchasers of Notes will have no control over us and will not be able to influence our corporate matters.
PFL is not offering and will not offer equity interests in its company. Investors who purchase Notes offered through our marketplace will have no equity interest in either of us and no ability to vote on or influence our decisions. As a result, PMI, which owns all of PFL's outstanding equity interests, will continue to have sole control over PFL's governance matters, subject to the presence of PFL's independent directors, whose consent will be required before PFL can take certain extraordinary actions, and subject to the limitations specified in PFL's organizational documents and the Amended and Indenture.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions that may be difficult to integrate, fail to achieve their strategic objectives, disrupt our business or divert management attention.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions of businesses, technologies and products that it intends to complement its existing business, solutions, services and technologies. PMI cannot provide assurance that the acquisitions it has made or will make in the future will provide it with the benefits or achieve the results anticipated in entering into the transaction. Acquisitions are typically accompanied by a number of risks, including: difficulties assimilating and retaining the management and other personnel, culture and operations of the acquired
33




businesses; potential disruption of ongoing business and distraction of management; difficulties in maintaining acceptable standards, controls, procedures and policies, including integrating financial reporting and operating systems, particularly with respect to foreign and/or public subsidiaries; potential loss of existing or acquired strategic operating partners, users and customers following an acquisition; difficulties in integrating acquired technologies and products into our solutions and services; and unexpected costs and expenses resulting from the acquisition, and potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses.
In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt, acquisition-related costs and expenses, restructuring charges and write-offs. Acquisitions may also result in goodwill and other intangible assets that are subject to impairment tests, which could result in future impairment charges.
PMI may enter into negotiations for acquisitions that are not ultimately consummated. Those negotiations could result in diversion of management time and significant out-of-pocket costs. If PMI fails to evaluate and execute acquisitions successfully, PMI may not be able to achieve its anticipated level of growth and its business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Events beyond our control may damage our ability to maintain adequate records, maintain our marketplace or perform the servicing obligations. If such events result in a system failure, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes would be substantially harmed.
If a catastrophic event resulted in a marketplace outage and physical data loss and/or affected our electronic data storage and back-up storage systems, PFL’s ability (and PMI’s ability as servicer under the Administration Agreement) to perform its servicing obligations would be materially and adversely affected. Such events include, but are not limited to, fires, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, natural disasters, computer viruses and telecommunications failures. In the event of any marketplace outage or physical data loss described in this paragraph, PFL cannot guarantee that investors would be able to recoup their investment in the Notes.
Events beyond our control, such as public health emergencies, international conflicts, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events, may damage our ability to continue operations without disruptions, including our ability to attract new borrowers and investors, retain existing investors, as well as the ability of existing borrowers to repay their loans. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Our business is subject to the risk that external events, such as public health emergencies, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events, could disrupt our day-to-day operations and impair the activities of borrowers and investors on our marketplace. Unforeseen events, or the prospect of such events, including acts of war (including the recent invasion of Ukraine by Russia), terrorism and other international conflicts, public health issues including health epidemics or pandemics, such as COVID-19, and natural disasters such as fires, hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados or other adverse weather and climate conditions, whether occurring in the United States or elsewhere, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of our vendors or result in political or economic instability. These events could reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive services from our vendors. Any such disruption could also damage our reputation, which would further lower investor or borrower demand for our products. We could also be subject to claims or litigation with respect to losses caused by such disruptions. Our property and business interruption insurance may not cover a particular event at all or be sufficient to fully cover our losses.
For example, the COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies, including us, to adopt wide-scale remote work protocols in an attempt to protect workforce health and slow community spread of the disease. While we have business continuity procedures in place to guide our response to a crisis, our attention may be diverted away from normal operations and our resources may be constrained. Likewise, borrowers and investors living in areas impacted by COVID-19 or other crises may also experience work slowdowns or stoppages, diminishing their capacity to apply for loans or invest through our marketplace. For existing borrowers, work slowdowns or stoppages may directly result in the inability to make loan payments, and may impair investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the corresponding Notes. Additionally, a potential recession or volatility in capital markets as a result of public health emergencies may cause existing investors to cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our marketplace. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
34




RISKS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE AND REGULATION
Our marketplace must comply with regulatory regimes applicable to consumer credit transactions as well as with regulatory regimes applicable to securities transactions. Certain state laws generally regulate interest rates and other charges and require certain disclosures, and also require licensing for certain activities. In addition, other state laws, public policy and general principles of equity relating to the protection of consumers, unfair and deceptive practices and debt collection practices may apply to the origination, servicing and collection of Borrower Loans in our marketplace. We are also subject to other laws, such as:
the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of their loans;
the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, which amended the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and requires additional procedures, disclosures, fee limits and other protections for consumers applying for or holding open end credit cards;
the Fair Credit Billing Act, which amended the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and creates creditor obligations with respect to billing complaints and errors for credit card customers;
the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act;
the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and Regulation V, which regulates the use, reporting and disclosure of information related to each applicant’s credit history;
the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Regulation F, which regulates debt collection practices by “debt collectors” and prohibits debt collectors from engaging in certain practices in collecting, and attempting to collect, outstanding personal loans;
state counterparts to the above consumer protection laws;
state and federal securities laws, which require that any non-exempt offers and sales of the Notes be registered;
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, and Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in connection with any consumer financial product or service;
the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which includes limitations on financial institutions’ disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties, in certain circumstances requires financial institutions to limit the use and further disclosure of nonpublic personal information by nonaffiliated third parties to whom they disclose such information and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information, and other privacy laws and regulations;
the California Consumer Privacy Act, which provides consumers in the state with extensive rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by certain businesses, and which obligates such businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for addressing consumer requests regarding their personal data;
the Bankruptcy Code, which limits the extent to which creditors may seek to enforce debts against parties who have filed for bankruptcy protection;
the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote their full attention to military duties;
the federal Military Lending Act, which provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions;
the federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which provide disclosure requirements, guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts;
the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures;
the federal Bank Secrecy Act, which relates to compliance with anti-money laundering, customer due diligence and record-keeping policies and procedures;
35




the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Regulation X, which applies to the HELOC product;
the federal Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C, which applies to the HELOC product; and
state mortgage broker and licensing and registration requirements that meet the minimum standards set forth in the federal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 and Regulation H.
We may not always be in compliance with these laws. Borrowers may make counterclaims regarding the enforceability of their obligations under borrower or consumer protection laws after collection actions have commenced, or otherwise seek damages under these laws. Investors may attempt to rescind their Note purchases under securities laws, and PFL or PMI’s failure to comply with such laws could also result in civil or criminal liability. Compliance with these requirements is also costly, time-consuming and limits operational flexibility. See Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information.
There continues to be uncertainty as to how the actions of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or any other new agency could impact our business or that of our issuing bank.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which commenced operations in July 2011, has broad authority over the businesses in which we engage. This includes authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth in Lending Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices through its regulatory, supervisory, and enforcement authority. To assist in its enforcement, the CFPB maintains an online complaint system that allows consumers to log complaints with respect to various consumer finance products, including the loan products we facilitate. This system could inform future CFPB decisions with respect to its regulatory, enforcement or examination focus.
We are subject to the CFPB's jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority. The CFPB may therefore request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities. In addition, the CFPB may conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis if the CFPB were to determine, based on, for example, consumer complaints, judicial opinions, or administrative decisions, that we are engaging in activities that pose risks to consumers. In addition, the CFPB has announced that it plans to make a rule for the direct supervision of nonbank installment lenders, which may permit the CFPB to conduct periodic examinations of our business.
There continues to be uncertainty as to how the CFPB's strategies and priorities, including in both its examination and enforcement processes, will impact our businesses and our results of operations going forward. Actions by the CFPB could result in requirements to alter or cease offering affected loan products and services, making them less attractive and restricting our ability to offer them.
Although we have committed resources to enhancing our compliance programs, actions by the CFPB or other regulators against us, our issuing banks or our competitors that discourage the use of the marketplace model or suggest to consumers the desirability of other loan products or services could result in reputational harm and a loss of borrowers or investors. Our compliance costs and litigation exposure could increase materially if the CFPB or other regulators enact new regulations, change regulations that were previously adopted, modify, through supervision or enforcement, past regulatory guidance, or interpret existing regulations in a manner different or stricter than have been previously interpreted.
Noncompliance with laws and regulations may impair our ability to facilitate the origination of or service Borrower Loans.
Generally, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements may, among other things, limit our or a third party collection agency's ability to collect all or part of the principal amount of or interest on the Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for payment. In addition, non-compliance could subject us to damages, revocation of required licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions, and civil and criminal liability, which may harm PFL's business and ability to maintain our marketplace and may result in borrowers rescinding their Borrower Loans.
Where applicable, we seek to comply with state lending, servicing and similar statutes, and we continually evaluate our licensing needs. In U.S. jurisdictions with licensing or other requirements that we believe may be applicable to our marketplace, we have obtained necessary licenses or comply with the relevant requirements. Nevertheless, if we are found to not comply with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or face other sanctions, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to continue to facilitate the origination of Borrower Loans through our marketplace, and on our ability to perform servicing obligations or make our marketplace available to borrowers in particular states, which may impair investors' ability to receive the payments of principal and interest on the Notes that they expect to receive.
If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.
36




If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed. The interest rates that are charged to borrowers and that form the basis of payments to investors through our marketplace are based upon the ability under federal law of the issuing bank that originates the loan to export the interest rates of the state where it is located and on our ability to assist the bank in arranging such loans. WebBank, the bank that issues personal loans through our marketplace, exports the interest rates of Utah, which allows parties to generally agree by contract to any interest rate. The interest rates offered by WebBank through our marketplace for Borrower Loans as of December 31, 2021 range from 5.31% to 31.82%, which equate to interest rates for Note investors that range from 4.31% to 30.82%. Some states where borrowers are located, including Utah, have no statutory interest rate limitations on personal loans, while other jurisdictions have a maximum rate less than the current maximum rate offered by WebBank through our marketplace. If a borrower were to successfully bring claims against us for state usury or other state law violations, we could be subject to fines and penalties. Further, if the current structure under which WebBank makes personal loans through our marketplace were successfully challenged, we may have to substantially modify our business operations and may be required to maintain state-specific licenses and only provide a limited range of interest rates for Borrower Loans, all of which may substantially reduce our operating efficiency and attractiveness to investors and possibly result in a decline in our operating results. Recent litigation has successfully challenged lending arrangements in which banks or other exempt entities make loans and sell those loans to a third party charged with servicing the loans.
In addition, it is possible that state usury laws may impose liability that could affect an assignee's (i.e., PFL's and/or an investor who purchases Borrower Loans from PFL) ability to continue to charge to borrowers the interest rates that they agreed to pay at origination of their Borrower Loans.
As discussed in Part I, Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation—State Usury Laws” above, in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC, in May 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC that interpreted the scope of federal preemption under the National Bank Act and held that a nonbank assignee of a loan originated by a national bank was not entitled to the benefits of federal preemption of claims of usury. On November 10, 2015, the defendant in the Madden case filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court for further review of the Second Circuit’s decision. On June 27, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition and refused to review the case, leaving the decision of the Second Circuit intact and binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont. The Madden decision has created some uncertainty as to whether non-bank entities purchasing loans originated by a bank may rely on federal preemption of state usury laws, and may create an increased risk of litigation by plaintiffs challenging our ability to collect interest in accordance with the terms of Borrower Loans. While the decision specifically addressed preemption under the National Bank Act, it could support future challenges to federal preemption for other institutions, including an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank like WebBank. However, although there can be no assurances as to the outcome of any potential litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on our marketplace, we believe the Madden case addressed facts that are not presented by our marketplace lending platform and thus would not apply to Borrower Loans.
In June 2020, the FDIC issued a final regulation entitled “Federal Interest Rate Authority” that, among other things, addressed the uncertainty resulting from the Madden decision, including uncertainty affecting marketplace lenders that partner with banks. Under the FDIC’s rule, which applies to FDIC-insured state-chartered industrial banks such as WebBank, interest on a loan originated by WebBank that was permissible under DIDA at origination is not affected by WebBank’s subsequent sale of the loan to PFL. Seven states and the District of Columbia sued the FDIC, however, seeking to have the regulation set aside on Administrative Procedure Act grounds. Three states brought a similar challenge in the same court to a similar regulation issued by the OCC under the NBA. Both suits were decided in February 8, 2022, with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruling that the FDIC and OCC had not exceeded their statutory authority when promulgating their respective rules.The court deferred to each federal agency's interpretation, and thus concluded that each agency’s rule was not unreasonable or arbitrary or capricious. The states have until April 11, 2022 to appeal the rulings to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. If the states appeal, a decision by the Ninth Circuit overturning the District Court’s rulings could subject Borrower Loans and PFL purchases from WebBank to state usury laws.
In January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claimed that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator’s lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank each intervened in the state court case filed against Marlette and Avant, respectively. On August 18, 2020, the parties reached a settlement that provides a safe harbor for the Marlette and Avant lending platforms, such that if the lending programs meet certain criteria related to oversight, disclosure, funding, licensing, consumer terms, and structure, the programs will be deemed to be in compliance with Colorado’s usury limits. On November 9, 2020, we amended our agreements with WebBank to address the requirements of the safe harbor for extending credit to borrowers in Colorado.
37




We had separately been in discussions with the Colorado Department of Law during the Marlette and Avant litigation regarding certain terms of Borrower Loans offered to Colorado residents. Effective as of July 30, 2019, we and the Administrator entered into a stipulation for the continued operation of the loan program in Colorado, subject to certain financing charge and late fee restrictions during the period that the stipulation is in effect. The stipulation remains in place but may be terminated with 21 days’ notice by either party. No further assurance can be provided as to the timing or outcome of the stipulation.
We and our counsel are monitoring these matters closely and, as developments warrant, we will consider any necessary changes to our marketplace required to avoid the impact of these cases on our business model. Because of investor demand, the maximum annual percentage rates offered through our marketplace may be lower in some states than others.
We rely on agreements with WebBank, pursuant to which WebBank originates personal loans on a uniform basis to qualified borrowers throughout the United States and sells and assigns those loans to PFL. If our relationships with WebBank were to end, we may need to rely on individual state lending licenses or partner with a different bank to offer Borrower Loans.
Borrower Loan requests take the form of an application to WebBank submitted through our marketplace. WebBank currently makes all personal loans to borrowers through our marketplace, which allows our marketplace to be available to borrowers on a uniform basis throughout the United States. If our relationships with WebBank were to end or if WebBank were to cease operations, one or both of PMI and PFL may need to rely on individual state lending licenses or we would need to partner with a different bank to originate Borrower Loans. Because neither of us currently possesses all required licenses to lend in every state, we might be forced to limit the rates of interest charged on Borrower Loans in some states and we might not be able to originate personal loans in some states altogether. If we partner with a new bank, service on our marketplace could be disrupted and delayed as we transition to a different bank partner. We also may face increased costs and compliance burdens if the agreements with WebBank are terminated.
Several lawsuits have sought to recharacterize certain loan marketers and other originators as lenders. If litigation or a regulatory enforcement action on similar theories were successful against one or both of PMI and PFL, Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace could be subject to state consumer protection laws and licensing requirements in a greater number of states.
Several lawsuits in the lending industry primarily involving high-interest “payday loan” marketers have brought under scrutiny the association between those firms and out-of-state banks. These lawsuits assert the loan marketers use out-of-state lenders in order to evade the consumer protection laws imposed by the states where they do business. Such litigation has sought to re-characterize the loan marketer as the lender for purposes of state consumer protection law and usury restrictions. Similar civil actions have been brought in the context of gift cards and retail purchase finance. Although we believe that our activities are generally distinguishable from the activities involved in these cases, a court or regulatory authority could disagree.
Additional state consumer protection laws would be applicable to the Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace if one or both of us were re-characterized as a lender, and the Borrower Loans could be voidable or unenforceable. In addition, we could be subject to claims by borrowers, as well as enforcement actions by regulators. Even if we were not required to cease doing business with residents of certain states or to change our business practices to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could be required to register or obtain licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose a substantial cost on us.
As online commerce develops, federal and state governments may draft and propose new laws to regulate commerce over the Internet, which may negatively affect our businesses.
As online commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation by federal and state governments becomes more likely. Our businesses could be negatively affected by the application of existing laws and regulations or the enactment of new laws applicable to marketplace lending. The cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, and we may be unable to pass along those costs to our users in the form of increased fees. In addition, federal and state governmental or regulatory agencies may decide to impose taxes on services provided online. These taxes could discourage the use of the Internet as a means of consumer lending, which would adversely affect the viability of our marketplace.
If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Company Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.
The Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”) contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment companies” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL and PMI believe each has conducted its business in a manner that does not result in being characterized as an investment company. If, however, PFL is deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, it may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and its activities may be restricted, which would materially adversely affect its business, financial
38




condition and results of operations. Any determination that PMI is an investment company under the Investment Company Act similarly could impair its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and thereby impair PFL’s ability to make payments on the Notes. If PFL or PMI were deemed to be an investment company, PFL or PMI may also attempt to seek exemptive relief from the SEC, which could impose significant costs and delays on their businesses.
If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Advisers Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.
The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the “Investment Advisers Act,” contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment advisers” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL believes that its business consists of providing a platform for marketplace lending for which investment adviser registration and regulation do not apply under applicable federal or state law, and does not believe that it is required to register as an investment adviser with either the SEC or any of the various states. The SEC or a state securities regulator could reach a different conclusion, however. Registration as an investment adviser could adversely affect PFL’s method of operation and revenues. For example, the Investment Advisers Act requires that an investment adviser act in a fiduciary capacity for its clients. Among other things, this fiduciary obligation requires that an investment adviser manage a client’s portfolio in the best interests of the client, have a reasonable basis for its recommendations, fully disclose to its client any material conflicts of interest that may affect its conduct and seek best execution for transactions undertaken on behalf of its client. It could be difficult for PFL to comply with this obligation without meaningful changes to its business operations, and there is no guarantee that it could do so successfully. If PFL were ever deemed to be in non-compliance with applicable investment adviser regulations, it could be subject to various penalties, including administrative or judicial proceedings that might result in censure, fine, civil penalties (including treble damages in the case of insider trading violations), the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or other adverse consequences. Similarly, any determination by regulators that PMI must register as an investment adviser could materially adversely affect PMI and impair its ability to continue to administer our marketplace on PFL’s behalf.
PMI's administration of Quick Invest under its previous offering and PFL’s administration of Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, and Auto Invest under its current offering, could create additional liability for PFL and such liability could be material.
Quick Invest was a loan search tool that allowed investors to identify Notes that met their investment criteria. An investor using Quick Invest was asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings they wished to use as search criteria, (ii) the total amount they wished to invest, and (iii) the amount they wished to invest per Note. Quick Invest then compiled a basket of Notes for their consideration that met their search criteria.
Recurring Investment (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) is an automated loan search tool that allows investors to easily invest in Notes that meet their specific investment criteria by automatically bidding any available funds in their account on Notes that match their selected parameters, in accordance with their specified instructions. An investor using Recurring Investment is asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings and term of the Notes they wish to use as search criteria, and (ii) the amount they wish to invest per Note. If they wish, the investor can further customize their investment criteria by applying one or more of several dozen additional search criteria, such as loan amount, debt-to-income ratio and credit score. The investor can also set aside a specific amount of their funds as a cash reserve that will not be invested by the Recurring Investment tool. After the investor has entered and saved the parameters of their search, Recurring Investment automatically (i) runs searches on the designated criteria as new listings are posted on the marketplace, and (ii) places bids on any Notes identified by each such search. Currently, the Recurring Investment tool is available only through our website, and is not available through our mobile app, Prosper Invest.
Auto Invest is an automated loan search tool that makes it easier for investors to build their desired portfolio of Notes by automatically investing any available funds in an investor’s account in Notes that match the investor’s specified investment criteria and allocation targets. An investor using Auto Invest is asked to select (i) a loan allocation target, or a target mix of loans based on Prosper Ratings, and (ii) the amount they wish to invest per Note. The investor has the option of selecting a target from Prosper’s series of preset loan allocations based on the recent historical loan inventory on the marketplace, any of which may be customized by changing the individual allocation targets for each Prosper Rating, or they can create a custom loan allocation target across Prosper Ratings based on their specific risk tolerance. If they wish, the investor can further customize their investment criteria by applying additional filters, such as loan term and employment status. The investor can also set aside a percentage of their portfolio as a cash reserve that will not be invested by Auto Invest. Investors may update their target allocations, cash reserve and other investment criteria, and pause and restart Auto Invest, at any time. Once the investor turns on Auto Invest, the tool may immediately begin placing orders for Notes in accordance with the investor’s current and target allocations and other criteria. The mix of Notes in any particular order may not match the investor’s individual loan allocation targets, but over time Auto Invest will place orders so that the aggregate holdings in the investor’s portfolio will approximate, to the extent possible, the allocation specified in their investment criteria.
39




Since the Notes purchased through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest and Quick Invest are the same as Notes purchased manually, they present the same risks of non-payment as all Notes that may be purchased through our marketplace. For example, there is a risk that a Borrower Loan identified through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest may become delinquent or default, and that the estimated return or historical return (as applicable) for that loan individually, or the estimated return or historical return (as applicable) for the allocation target or the basket of Notes selected by Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest as a whole, may not accurately reflect the actual return on such loan or Notes. If this were to occur, an investor who purchased a Note from PFL through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest could pursue a claim against PFL in connection with its representations regarding the performance of the Borrower Loans bid upon through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest, respectively. An investor could pursue such a claim under various anti-fraud theories under federal and state securities law.
We may face liability under state and federal securities law for statements in our prospectus and in other communications that could be deemed to be an offer to the extent that such statements are deemed to be false or misleading.
Loan listings and other borrower information available on PFL's website as well as in sales and listing reports are statements made in connection with the purchase and sale of securities that are subject to the antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act and the Securities Act. In general, these liability provisions provide a purchaser of the Notes with a right to bring a claim against one or both of us for damages arising from any untrue statement of material fact or failure to state a material fact necessary to make any statements made not misleading. Even though PFL and PMI have advised investors of what they believe to be the material risks associated with an investment in the Notes and PMI management rights, the SEC or a court could determine that they have not advised investors of all of the material facts regarding an investment in the Notes and PMI Management Rights, which could give investors the right to rescind their investment and obtain damages, and could subject PFL and PMI to civil fines or criminal penalties in addition to any such rescission rights or damages.
PMI and PFL’s activities in connection with the offer and sale of securities through our marketplace could result in potential violations of federal securities law and result in material liability to PFL and/or PMI.
PFL and PMI’s respective businesses are subject to federal and state securities laws that may limit the kinds of activities in which PFL and PMI may engage and the manner in which they engage in such activities. For example, changes to the manner in which PFL offers and sells Notes or other securities through our marketplace could be viewed by the SEC or a state securities regulator as involving the creation or sale of new, unregistered securities. In such circumstances, the failure to register such securities could subject PFL to liability and the amount of such liability could be meaningful. In addition, in 2008, PMI entered into a settlement with the SEC pursuant to which PMI agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations or any future violations of Sections 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act. Failure to comply with that order could result in material civil or criminal liability, which could materially adversely affect PMI’s business and PFL’s offering of Notes.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters, including our principal administrative, marketing, technical support and engineering functions, is located in San Francisco, California, where we lease approximately 50,000 square feet of office space under leases that will expire February 28, 2023. We have also entered into leases for approximately 44,500 square feet of office space located in Arizona and Utah. We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our current needs and that suitable additional alternative spaces will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Our disclosure set forth under Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies—West Virginia Matter, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
Prosper Funding's disclosure set forth under Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies—West Virginia Matter, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
In March 2021, PMI and PFL accepted service of a complaint via email. PMI, PFL and Velocity Investments, LLC, an accounts receivable management company (“Velocity”), were each named in a purported class action lawsuit brought by two individual plaintiffs in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, filed on February 3, 2021 (the “Jones Litigation”). The complaint asserts, on behalf of the plaintiffs and the class members, claims for violation of certain Maryland state laws and seeks damages. The plaintiffs also seek a declaration of requirement for Maryland licensure and that PMI, PFL, and Velocity did not have the right to collect money from the plaintiffs and the class members on the loan accounts. The Jones Litigation was accompanied by a related petition to stay arbitration and demand declaratory judgement in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland (the “Jones Petition”). On April 8, 2021, the Jones Litigation was removed to the United States District
40




Court for the District of Maryland (the “Federal District Court”). In March 2021, a similar class action lawsuit, Khan v. Crown Asset Management LLC, was filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland (the “Khan Litigation”) accompanied by a related petition to stay arbitration (the “Khan Petition”). Prosper was not a named defendant in the Khan Litigation or the Khan Petition. In May 2021, the Khan Litigation was removed to the Federal District Court. On July 15, 2021, plaintiff dismissed the Jones Petition but joined PMI, PFL, and Velocity to the Khan Petition (the “Combined Petition”). The Combined Petition was removed on July 29, 2021 to the Federal District Court. On March 21, 2022, the Federal District Court issued a ruling to compel arbitration in the Jones Litigation and the Khan Litigation, stay the Combined Petition, and combine all cases. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of this matter or estimate the amount of damages, if any, that may be awarded.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information; Holders of Record
There is no established public trading market for PMI's or PFL's common equity. As of December 31, 2021, there were approximately 358 holders of record of PMI’s common stock. As of December 31, 2021, PMI owns 100% of PFL's membership interests.
Dividend Policy
PMI has not paid cash dividends since inception, and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Item 12 in Part III of this Annual Report for information about securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
For the year ended December 31, 2019, PMI issued 173,356 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.15. For the year ended December 31, 2020, PMI issued 687,471 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.02. For the year ended December 31, 2021, PMI issued 3,014,622 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.02. These securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder relative to sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not repurchase any common and preferred stock.

ITEM 6. [Reserved]
41




ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with historical financial statements and related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those included in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2021 and 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020. For discussions related to 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019, see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
Overview
Our vision is to transform lives by providing affordable financial solutions through the simplest and most trusted platform. We currently offer access to three lending products, each of which supports our vision: (i) unsecured personal loans through a personal loan marketplace which connects eligible consumer borrowers with individual and institutional investors, (ii) a Credit Card product available to eligible borrowers, and (iii) a HELOC product available to eligible homeowners.
We believe our business model has key advantages relative to traditional banks, including (i) an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects qualified supply and demand of capital, (ii) online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience, and (iii) use of advanced technology and artificial intelligence to deliver simple, fast, personalized, and transparent solutions that can improve consumers’ financial health as they move across the credit spectrum. We do not operate physical branches or incur expenses related to infrastructure like traditional banks or consumer finance institutions. As part of operating our marketplace, we verify the identity of borrowers and assess borrowers’ credit risk profile using a combination of public and proprietary data. Our proprietary technology automates several loan origination and servicing functions, including the borrower application process, data gathering, underwriting, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, our personal loan marketplace facilitated $1.9 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $1.7 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 88% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. During the quarter ended December 31, 2021, our marketplace facilitated $524 million in Borrower Loan originations, of which $464 million were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 89% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. From inception through December 31, 2021 our marketplace has facilitated $20.1 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $18.0 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 89% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period.
As a credit marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate on our marketplace as borrowers or investors and, consequently, could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Recent Developments
We continue to track the impact of COVID-19 and its variants on our communities, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to 4 monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment may continue as long as the pandemic continues to trigger financial hardship for borrowers.
42




Key Operating and Financial Metrics (in thousands)
The following table displays our key operating and financial metrics for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019:
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Loan Originations$1,946,974 $1,486,238 $2,666,085 
Transaction Fees, Net$89,364 $67,335 $119,282 
Whole Loans Outstanding (1)
$2,529,814 $2,816,586 $3,659,601 
Servicing Fees, Net$15,024 $18,517 $23,406 
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $153,570 
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,711)
Core Revenue (2)
$144,626 $103,236 $171,123 
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
$12,814 $(8,587)$3,920 
(1) Balance as of December 31
(2) Core Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP Financial measures. For more information regarding these measures and reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
Loan Originations
Total loan originations on the platform increased 31% for the year ended December 31, 2021 when compared to the year ended December 31, 20172020, which resulted in an increase in Transaction Fees of 33%, or $22.0 million. The loan originations increase for the year ended December 31, 2021 versus the year ended December 31, 2020 was due primarily to increased investor demand, lower rates offered to borrowers and less restrictive underwriting requirements, which is also reflective of the general economic recovery since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
From inception of the Company through December 31, 2021, a total of 1,594,197 Borrower Loans, totaling $20.1 billion, were originated through our marketplace. For the year ended December 31, 2021, 183,041 Borrower Loans totaling $1.9 billion were originated through our marketplace, as compared to 119,711 Borrower Loans totaling $1.5 billion originated in 2020, which represented a unit increase of 53% and a dollar increase of 31%. For the year ended December 31, 2020, 119,711 Borrower Loans totaling $1.5 billion were originated through our marketplace, as compared to 195,656 Borrower Loans totaling $2.7 billion originated in 2019, which represented a unit decrease of 39% and a dollar decrease of 44%.
Loan origination volume by Prosper Rating was as follows for the periods presented (in millions, except percentage):

Year Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Amount%Amount%Amount%
AA$246 13 %$270 18 %$348 13 %
A374 19 %437 29 %639 24 %
B319 16 %311 21 %669 25 %
C246 13 %211 15 %606 22 %
D104 %60 %227 %
E36 %16 %63 %
HR— %— %17 %
Other (1)
621 32 %179 12 %97 %
Total$1,947 100 %$1,486 100 %$2,666 100 %
(1) Represents loans funded through the Prosper platform via the Whole Loan Channel but not assigned Prosper Ratings. These loans are sold only to institutional investors and based on specific underwriting criteria and custom risk models developed by these investors.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the mix of originations on the Prosper platform was generally reflective of less restrictive underwriting standards as compared to the net interest earned oncorresponding period in 2020, as the borrower loans purchased by Prosper with fundingeconomy continued to recover from the Warehouse Line (as defined in Note 10 of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements).  Overall, the decrease in net interest income for 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily driven by the decrease in volume of Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel.
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net
The fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based uponCOVID-19 pandemic. There has also been a set of valuation assumptions. The main assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes include prepayment rates derived from historical prepayment rates for each credit grade, default rates derived from historical performance, recovery rates and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. Loans Held for Sale are valued using the same approach as the Borrower Loans held at fair value. Thesignificant increase in the change in fair valuenumber and dollar amount of loans heldnot assigned Prosper ratings as the Company continues to sell higher risk loans through the Whole Loan Channel to institutional investors that rely on their own custom risk models to underwrite the loans.
43




Whole Loans Outstanding
We sell Borrower Loans through our Whole Loan Channel, and the outstanding balance of these loans serves as a primary driver of our Servicing Assets. Whole loans outstanding decreased $286.8 million or 10% from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021, and $843.0 million or 23% from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020. These decreases are due primarily to the drop in originations from 2019 to 2020 as a result of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by the increase in originations from 2020 to 2021 discussed above. We have also continued to purchase and hold loans in consolidated warehouse trusts, reducing the balance of outstanding whole loans.
Net (Loss) Income
See the section titled “Results of Operations” below, for sale was due to fair valuethe discussion on significant changes on the loans purchased via the Warehouse Line.in Net (Loss) Income year-over-year.
Results of Operations
Overview
The following table summarizes the fair value adjustmentsour net (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016, respectively (dollar amounts2019 (in thousands, except percentage):
Years Ended December 31,
20212020Change% Change20202019Change% Change
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $41,390 40 %$103,236 $153,570 $(50,334)(33)%
Total Expenses282,896 84,669 198,227 n/m84,669 167,181 (82,512)(49)%
Net (Loss) Income Before Income Taxes(138,270)18,567 (156,837)n/m18,567 (13,611)32,178 n/m
Income Tax Expense(71)(16)(55)n/m(16)(100)84 (84)%
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(156,892)n/m$18,551 $(13,711)$32,262 n/m
n/m: not meaningful
Total Net Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $41.4 million, or 40%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to the Change in thousands):Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net, which was a $3.2 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to a $34.2 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2021, a $31.0 million change. The loss in the prior year was largely due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which negatively impacted the fair value of our Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale. Additionally, there was a $22.0 million increase in Transaction Fees, Net, and a $2.4 million increase in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans, both of which were due to the increase in originations during this time. Other Revenues also increased $1.3 million, related primarily to additional credit referral and incentive fee revenue due to increased application volume. These increases were partially offset by a $11.7 million decrease in Total Interest Income (Expense), Net, due primarily to lower outstanding principal balances on securitized Borrower Loans (prior to their deconsolidation from the balance sheet on September 27, 2021), and a $3.5 million decrease in Servicing Fees, Net, as the servicing book of whole loans declined.
 Year ended December 31,
 201820172016
Borrower Loans$(31,265)$(25,552)$(25,934)
Loans Held for Sale(4,616)(7)
Notes30,574 25,031 25,569 
Total$(5,307)$(514)$(372)
Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $198.2 million as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, which is primarily due to a $138.6 million loss from the Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants, which compared to a $37.7 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2021. The loss in 2021 is driven by an increase in the fair value of the underlying Convertible Preferred Stock. Origination and Servicing, Sales and Marketing and General and Administrative expenses increased a combined $20.7 million from the prior year, as costs increased to support the higher origination volume in 2021. Additionally, various cost reductions were achieved in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including lower compensation and professional services costs. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we also recognized a $1.5 million loss related to the deconsolidation of our securitization variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which is more fully discussed in Note 6 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $156.9 million million when compared to the net income generated for the year ended December 31, 2020.
4644



Expenses
Revenues
The following table summarizes our expensesrevenues for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands)2019 (in thousands, except percentage):
Years Ended December 31,
 20212020Change% Change20202019Change% Change
Operating Revenues:   
Transaction Fees, Net$89,364 $67,335 $22,029 33 %$67,335 $119,282 $(51,947)(44)%
Servicing Fees, Net15,024 18,517 (3,493)(19)%18,517 23,406 (4,889)(21)%
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans7,196 4,816 2,380 49 %4,816 10,946 (6,130)(56)%
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans— — — n/a— (17,553)17,553 100 %
Other Revenues3,992 2,711 1,281 47 %2,711 5,953 (3,242)(54)%
Total Operating Revenues115,576 93,379 22,197 24 %93,379 142,034 (48,655)(34)%
Interest Income (Expense):
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale83,107 104,150 (21,043)(20)%104,150 100,786 3,364 %
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments(50,816)(60,127)9,311 (15)%(60,127)(63,736)3,609 (6)%
Total Interest Income (Expense), Net32,291 44,023 (11,732)(27)%44,023 37,050 6,973 19 %
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(3,241)(34,166)30,925 91 %(34,166)(25,514)(8,652)(34)%
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $41,390 40 %$103,236 $153,570 $(50,334)(33)%
 Year ended December 31,
 20182017% Change20172016% Change
Expenses   
Origination and Servicing$35,116 $34,881 %$34,881 $33,944 %
Sales and Marketing77,997 83,462 (7)%83,462 70,146 19 %
General and Administrative - Research and Development17,066 16,383 %16,383 26,214 (38)%
General and Administrative - Other55,305 59,303 (7)%59,303 76,521 (23)%
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(45,003)29,140 (254)%29,140 100 %
Restructuring Charges1,762 1,340 31 %1,340 17,027 (92)%
Other Expenses, Net1,891 7,392 (74)%7,392 30,341 (76)%
Total Expenses$144,134 $231,901 (38)%231,901 254,200 (9)%
Transaction Fees, Net
AsWe earn a transaction fee upon the successful origination of all Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace. We receive payments from WebBank as compensation for the activities we perform on behalf of WebBank. Our fee is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loans that we facilitate on our marketplace and WebBank originates. We record the transaction fee revenue net of any fees paid by us to WebBank.  
Transaction Fees increased by $22.0 million, or 33%, for the year ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, as compared to 2020. This increase was consistent with the higher origination volume discussed above.
Servicing Fees, Net
Investors who purchase Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel typically pay us a servicing fee which is generally set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates us for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and 2016, we had 415, 377 and 355 full-time employees, respectively.maintaining investors’ account portfolios. We record Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenues when received. The following table reflects full-time employees asdecrease of $3.5 million, or 19%, in Servicing Fees for the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 by department.
 December 31,
 201820172016
Origination and Servicing160 163 151 
Sales and Marketing17 13 28 
General and Administrative - Research and Development97 81 78 
General and Administrative - Other141 120 98 
Total Headcount415 377 355 
Origination and Servicing
Origination and Servicing costs consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our credit, collections, customer support and payment processing employees and vendor costs associated with facilitating and servicing Borrower Loans. The increase in Origination and Servicing costs in 20182021 as compared to 2017 was not significant.
The increase in 2017 compared to 2016 of 3%2020 was primarily due to $1.8 milliona lower average principal balance of whole loans serviced, which was in turn due primarily to (a) the reduced originations in the prior year as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and (b) an increase in the average principal balance of loans held in consolidated warehouse trusts.
We also increased amortization costsour base market servicing rate from 0.625% to 0.648% in the third quarter of 2021, which further decreased our Servicing Fees, Net balance for internal use softwarethe year ended December 31, 2021. This change was developed with the assistance of a valuation specialist, and $1.9 millionwas primarily due to observations of increased use of outsourced services. The increase was offset by a decrease inmarket servicing compensation costs of $2.9 million.rates.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing efforts are designed to attract individuals and institutions to our products, encourage their enrollment and participation as users, and facilitate and enhance their understanding and utilization of each product. We employ a wide range of marketing channels to reach potential customers and build our brand and value proposition. These channels include referrals, online marketing, direct mail, partner and affiliate introductions, and email. We are constantly seeking new methods to reach more potential members, while testing and optimizing the end-to-end customer experience.
Origination and Servicing
We have efficient and scalable systems for credit risk assessment, loan underwriting, and servicing. Our risk models take borrowers’ supplied information and combine that information with public and proprietary data to make real time decisions. Our verification agents use several tools to efficiently verify borrower information. Our personal loan servicing platform calculates a loan’s amortization and processes payments received from borrowers and passes such payments on to investors. In addition, we have a back-up servicing agreement with Vervent, Inc. (“Vervent”) (f/k/a First Associates Loan Servicing, LLC), a loan servicing company that is willing and able to assume servicing responsibilities in the event that we are no longer able to service the Borrower Loans and Notes. Vervent is a financial services company that has entered into numerous successor loan servicing agreements.
Technology
We have made substantial investment in our customer acquisition capability, customer experience, and credit underwriting, loan servicing and payment systems. Our personal loan marketplace utilizes proprietary software to process electronic cash movements, record book entries and calculate cash balances in users’ funding accounts. Electronic deposits and payments are mostly done via Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) transactions. The technology platform allows us to economically acquire and service Borrower Loans and Notes, and allows WebBank to efficiently originate and fund Borrower Loans.
The system hardware for our personal loan marketplace is located in hosting facilities in Scottsdale, Arizona, Las Vegas, Nevada, The Dalles, Oregon and Council Bluffs, Iowa. We own the hardware deployed in support of our personal loan marketplace. We continuously monitor the performance and availability of our marketplace. The infrastructure is scalable and utilizes standard techniques such as load-balancing and redundancies.
Key aspects of our technology include:
Scalability.Our personal loan marketplace is designed and built as a real-time, highly scalable, multi-tier, redundant system. It incorporates technologies designed to prevent any single point of failure within the data center from taking the entire system offline. This is achieved by utilizing load-balancing technologies at the front end and business layer
11




tiers and clustering technologies in the back-end tiers to allow scaling both horizontally and vertically depending on marketplace utilization. 
Data Integrity and Security.We are committed to protecting our users' information and we take the integrity and security of the data provided by them very seriously. To that end, we have established data protection policies which are implemented and enforced using the latest technologies. All sensitive information is transmitted on secure channels using SSL technology, with SSL certificates issued by Symantec or DigiCert. We employ principles of least privilege and layered security to protect stored sensitive information. Sensitive information at rest is encrypted using the industry level encryption technologies with appropriate controls to access the data. We protect the network perimeter using the latest technologies including but not limited to firewall and anti-virus threat management techniques. We use strong multi-factor authentication to protect and monitor remote access. We back up all data securely and would expect to recover operations in a short period of time in the event of a disaster. Logging and monitoring of the systems and security controls enables us to ensure that the controls are functional and that alerts are triggered on security violations.
Fraud Detection.We employ a combination of proprietary technologies and commercially available licensed technologies and solutions to prevent and detect fraud. These include knowledge-based authentication, behavioral analytics and digital fingerprinting to prevent identity fraud. We use services from third-party vendors for user identification, credit checks and for checking customer names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals and other lists maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). In addition, we use specialized third-party software to augment the identity fraud detection systems. We also have a dedicated team which conducts additional investigations of cases flagged for high fraud risk. Finally, we enable users to report suspicious activity, which we may then evaluate further.
Targeted Risk Assessment. Our AI-driven credit risk models include flags and characteristics which are unique to our platform. We believe this results in a risk assessment that is more targeted and accurate than the traditional lenders, leading to higher approval rates, lower interest rates and highly automated identity and income verification. We are continuing to improve the AI technology embedded within our models to facilitate and improve access to credit and the application experience for borrowers. We have been building and enhancing AI models since 2015 and currently have AI models for underwriting, early payment default, third party fraud, income verification, collections and our direct mail program.
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trade secret, trademark, and other rights, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect our proprietary technology, processes and other intellectual property. We enter into confidentiality and other written agreements with our employees, consultants and service providers, and through these and other written agreements, attempt to control access to and distribution of the software, documentation and other proprietary technology and information. We also utilize a robust multi-layered monitoring program, including third party domain monitoring services, web search engine alerts and our outside counsel, which we leverage to actively enforce our intellectual property rights. Despite these efforts to protect our proprietary rights, third parties may, in an authorized or unauthorized manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain and market or distribute our intellectual property rights or technology or otherwise develop a product with the same functionality. Policing all unauthorized use of intellectual property rights is nearly impossible. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken or will take in the future will prevent misappropriations of our technology or intellectual property rights.
We have registered several trademarks in the United States, including “Prosper,” “FAAS,” “Make Healthcare Affordable,” “Powered by Prosper” and numerous stylized marks, including the Prosper and Prosper Healthcare Lending logos.
We have invested in a research and development program and, as of December 31, 2021, we had two issued patents and six patent applications filed and pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We may file additional patent applications or pursue additional patent protection in the future to the extent we believe it will be beneficial.
Human Capital Resources
Employee Profile
At Prosper, our mission is to advance financial well-being and our employees are critical to achieving this mission. We are committed to hiring and developing employees who embody our core values: accountability, collaboration, excellence, curiosity, diversity, simplicity, and integrity. As of December 31, 2021, we had 384 full-time employees, all of whom were based in the United States. Our employees are split into the following four functions: 121 in origination and servicing, 20 in sales and marketing, 101 in general and administrative – research and development, and 142 in general and administrative –
12




other. None of our employees are represented by labor unions. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Employee Health & Wellness
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the safety and well-being of our employees and their families has been a top priority as we continue to serve our customers. We transitioned our entire workforce to remote working arrangements and provide a monthly stipend to cover added remote costs. We also keep our employees informed with frequent communications on health and community resources and information along with updates regarding our own response to COVID-19. We continue to monitor and update our practices to remain aligned and ahead of federal, state and local laws, regulations, guidelines and recommendations.
Our employees have access to several programs and benefits related to employee wellness including: traditional life and health (medical, dental, vision) insurance, flexible paid time off, free membership to physical, mental and emotional health resources, and parental leave programs, among others. We have also introduced specific programs and benefits for caregivers during the pandemic including free tutoring for school-aged children. We believe our progressive human resources policies, learning and development, talent acquisition, and community engagement and support activities enable us to attract and retain key personnel.
Employee Recognition and Talent Development
We understand that to attract and retain great people, we must listen to and engage them regularly. We conduct an anonymous, company-wide employee engagement survey twice a year to gauge our progress and identify the areas where we excel and areas for improvement in the employee experience. Following each survey, we identify areas where we would like to focus to support engagement within the company and create action plans to support those initiatives. We have implemented two award programs to recognize and honor our employees who exemplify our values.
Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we require ongoing regulatory and compliance training for our employees. Additionally, we provide a series of leadership training for all people managers. We also offer employees free access to on-demand training on an array of subjects from technical to business management to build the skills and advance their careers as well as opportunities for employees to pursue their passion projects and leadership development in alignment with our values.
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging
Diversity and collaboration are among our company’s core values and we believe our efforts in diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (“DEIB”) fuel our innovation and drive our success. Our goal is to foster a diverse and inclusive workplace where our employees feel that their identities and experiences are represented, embraced and celebrated. We are also committed to our efforts to increase diversity through our hiring practices by using gender-neutral job postings and recruiting policies that promote diverse candidates. We recruit the best people for the job regardless of differences that include gender, ethnicity and other protected traits and it is our policy to comply fully with all federal, state and local laws relating to discrimination in the workplace. We have several employee resource groups that help us to identify opportunities and actions related to DEIB and to better engage underrepresented populations. Our DEIB principles are also reflected in our employee training, and in particular with respect to our policies against harassment and bullying and the elimination of bias in the workplace. We continue to enhance our DEIB policies, with guidance by our executive leadership team.
13




Government Regulation
Overview
The lending and securities industries are highly regulated. Each of the financial products offered by us are subject to extensive and complex rules and regulations. We also are subject to licensing and examination by various federal, state and local government authorities. These authorities impose obligations and restrictions on our activities, WebBank’s activities and the Borrower Loans acquired and Notes issued through our marketplace, Coastal’s activities and the Credit Card product, and Spring EQ and the HELOC product. In particular, these rules may limit the fees that may be assessed, require extensive disclosure to, and consents from, borrowers, prohibit discrimination, and impose multiple qualification and licensing obligations on our activities. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registrations, loss of approved status, voiding of loan contracts, indemnification liabilities to contract counterparties, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions and civil and criminal liabilities. While compliance with such requirements is at times complicated by our novel business model, we believe we are in substantial compliance with these rules and regulations. These rules and regulations are subject to continuous change, however, and a material change could have an adverse effect on our compliance efforts and ability to operate.

From time to time, various types of federal and state legislation are proposed and new regulations are introduced that could result in additional regulation of, and restrictions on, the business of consumer lending. We cannot predict whether any such legislation or regulations will be adopted or how this would affect our business or our important relationships with third parties. In addition, the interpretation of existing legislation may change or may prove different than anticipated when applied to our novel business model. Compliance with such requirements could involve additional costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of consumer lending in the United States, our business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal and state legislation and regulations that may increase the cost of doing business.
Personal Loan State and Federal Laws and Regulations
State Licensing Requirements. In most states we believe that WebBank, as originator of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace, satisfies any relevant licensing requirements with respect to the origination of such Borrower Loans. In addition, as needed, we seek licenses and/or authorizations of various types so that we may conduct activities such as servicing and marketing in all states and the District of Columbia, with the exceptions of Iowa and West Virginia. We are subject to supervision and examination by the state regulatory authorities that administer these state lending laws. The licensing statutes vary from state to state and prescribe or impose different requirements, including: restrictions on loan origination and servicing practices, limits on finance charges and the type, amount and manner of charging fees; disclosure requirements; requirements that licensees submit to periodic examination; surety bond and minimum specified net worth requirements; periodic financial reporting requirements; notification requirements for changes in principal officers, stock ownership or corporate control; restrictions on advertising; and requirements that loan forms be submitted for review.
State Usury Laws. Section 521 of the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (12 U.S.C. § 1831d) (“DIDA”) and Section 85 of the National Bank Act (“NBA”) (12 U.S.C. § 85), federal case law interpreting the NBA such as Tiffany v. National Bank of Missouri and Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First Omaha Service Corporation, and FDIC advisory opinion 92-47 permit FDIC-insured depository institutions, such as WebBank, to “export” the interest rate permitted under the laws of the state where the bank is located, regardless of the usury limitations imposed by the state law of the borrower’s state of residence unless the state has chosen to opt out of the exportation regime. WebBank is located in Utah, and Title 70C of the Utah Code does not limit the amount of fees or interest that may be charged by WebBank on loans of the type offered through our marketplace. Only Iowa and Puerto Rico have opted out of the exportation regime under Section 525 of DIDA and we do not operate in either jurisdiction. However, if a state in which we did operate opted out of rate exportation, we believe that judicial interpretations support the view that such opt outs only apply to loans “made” in those states.  
In May 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC that interpreted the scope of federal preemption under the NBA and held that a nonbank assignee of a loan originated by a national bank was not entitled to the benefits of federal preemption of claims of usury. On November 10, 2015, the defendant in the Madden case filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court for further review of the Second Circuit’s decision. On June 27, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition and refused to review the case, leaving the decision of the Second Circuit intact and binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont. The Madden decision has created some uncertainty as to whether non-bank entities purchasing loans originated by a bank may rely on federal preemption of state usury laws, and may create an increased risk of litigation by plaintiffs challenging our ability to collect interest in accordance with the terms of Borrower Loans. While the decision specifically addressed preemption under the NBA, it could support future challenges to federal preemption for other institutions, including an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank like WebBank. However, although there can be no assurances as to the outcome of any potential
14




litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on our marketplace, we believe the Madden case addressed facts that are not presented by our marketplace lending platform and thus would not apply to Borrower Loans.  
In June 2020, the FDIC issued a final regulation entitled “Federal Interest Rate Authority” that, among other things, addressed the uncertainty resulting from the Madden decision, including uncertainty affecting marketplace lenders that partner with banks. Under the FDIC’s rule, which applies to FDIC-insured state-chartered industrial banks such as WebBank, interest on a loan originated by WebBank that was permissible under DIDA at origination is not affected by WebBank’s subsequent sale of the loan to PFL. Seven states and the District of Columbia sued the FDIC, however, seeking to have the regulation set aside on Administrative Procedure Act grounds. Three states brought a similar challenge in the same court to a similar regulation issued by the OCC under the NBA. Both suits were decided in February 8, 2022, with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruling that the FDIC and OCC had not exceeded their statutory authority when promulgating their respective rules.The court deferred to each federal agency's interpretation, and thus concluded that each agency’s rule was not unreasonable or arbitrary or capricious. The states have until April 11, 2022 to appeal the rulings to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. If the states appeal, a decision by the Ninth Circuit overturning the District Court’s rulings could subject Borrower Loans and PFL purchases from WebBank to state usury laws.
In January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claimed that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator’s lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank each intervened in the state court case filed against Marlette and Avant, respectively. On August 18, 2020, the parties reached a settlement that provides a safe harbor for the Marlette and Avant lending platforms, such that if the lending programs meet certain criteria related to oversight, disclosure, funding, licensing, consumer terms, and structure, the programs will be deemed to be in compliance with Colorado’s usury limits. On November 9, 2020, we amended our agreements with WebBank to address the requirements of the safe harbor for extending credit to borrowers in Colorado.
If a Borrower Loan made through our marketplace was deemed to be subject to the usury laws of a state that has opted-out of the exportation regime or becomes bound by the Second Circuit’s or a similar judicial decision (including a judicial decision setting aside the FDIC’s regulation governing permissible interest on loans sold by banks to non-banks), we could become subject to fines, penalties, and possible forfeiture of amounts charged to borrowers, and we may decide not to originate Borrower Loans through our marketplace in that applicable jurisdiction, which may adversely impact our growth. For more information, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors—If our marketplace were found to violate a state’s usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.”
State Securities Laws. We are subject to the securities laws of each state in which the registration or qualification to offer and sell the Notes and PMI Management Rights has been approved. Certain of these state laws require us to renew the registration or qualification of Notes and PMI Management Rights on an annual basis.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) created many new restrictions and an expanded framework of regulatory oversight for the financial services industry. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protections by creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), which has broad authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth-in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions, such as our issuing bank, for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices” through its regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority. We are subject to the CFPB’s jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority and may become subject to their supervisory authority, as a servicer and acquirer of consumer credit. The CFPB may request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities, and also conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis.
Truth-in-Lending Act. The federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”), and Regulation Z, which implements TILA, require creditors to provide consumers with uniform, understandable information concerning certain terms and conditions of their loan and credit transactions. These rules apply to WebBank as the creditor for Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace, but because the transactions are carried out on our hosted website, we facilitate compliance at WebBank’s direction. For closed-end credit transactions of the type provided through our marketplace, these disclosures include providing the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, the amount financed, the number of payments and the amount of the monthly payment. The creditor must provide the disclosures before the Borrower Loan is closed. TILA also regulates the advertising of credit and gives borrowers, among other things, certain rights regarding updated disclosures and the treatment of credit
15




balances. Our marketplace provides borrowers with a TILA disclosure prior to the time a Borrower Loan is originated. We also seek to comply with TILA’s disclosure requirements related to credit advertising.
Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”) prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, or the fact that all or part of the applicant’s income derives from any public assistance program or the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act or any applicable state law. Regulation B, which implements ECOA, restricts creditors from requesting certain types of information from applicants and from making statements that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application. These requirements apply both to lenders such as WebBank and other parties like us that regularly implement and communicate credit decisions. Investors may also be subject to the ECOA in their capacity as purchasers of Notes, if they are deemed to regularly participate in credit decisions. In the underwriting of Borrower Loans on our marketplace, both WebBank and we seek to comply with ECOA’s provisions prohibiting discouragement and discrimination. ECOA also requires creditors to provide consumers with timely notices of adverse action taken on credit applications. WebBank and we provide prospective borrowers who apply for a Borrower Loan through our marketplace but are denied credit with an adverse action notice which is in compliance with applicable requirements (see also below regarding “Fair Credit Reporting Act”).
Fair Credit Reporting Act. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and its implementing regulations, including Regulation V, promote the accuracy, fairness and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. FCRA requires a permissible purpose to obtain a consumer credit report, and requires persons to report loan payment information to credit bureaus accurately. FCRA also imposes disclosure requirements on creditors who take adverse action on credit applications based on information contained in a credit report. WebBank and we have a permissible purpose for obtaining credit reports on potential borrowers and WebBank and we also obtain explicit consent from borrowers to obtain such reports. As the servicer for the Borrower Loan, we have systems in place to report Borrower Loan payment and delinquency information to appropriate reporting agencies. We provide an adverse action notice to a rejected borrower on WebBank’s behalf at the time the borrower is rejected that includes all the required disclosures. We have also implemented an identity theft prevention program as required by law.  
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and its implementing regulation, Regulation F, provide guidelines and limitations on the conduct of third-party debt collectors in connection with the collection of consumer debts. The FDCPA limits certain communications with third parties, imposes notice and debt validation requirements, and prohibits threatening, harassing or abusive conduct in the course of debt collection. We are not a “debt collector” under the FDCPA, which the statute defines as a person who regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed or due, or asserted to be owed or due, to another. The CFPB retained the statute’s “debt collector” definition in its November 2020 final rules implementing the FDCPA. As the servicer for Borrower Loans originated by WebBank and owned by investors, we are not a debt collector based on our facilitation of loans in the origination process and/or its servicing of the Borrower Loans after the time of origination and prior to any default. While the FDCPA applies to third-party debt collectors, debt collection laws of certain states impose similar requirements on creditors who collect their own debts. Our agreement with our investors prohibits investors from attempting to collect directly on the Borrower Loan. We use our internal collection team and professional external debt collection agents to collect delinquent accounts. They are required to comply with all other applicable laws in collecting delinquent accounts of our borrowers.  
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties. The SCRA, as well as certain state laws with similar protections for military members, require us to adjust the interest rate of borrowers who qualify for and request relief. If a borrower with an outstanding Borrower Loan qualifies for protection under the SCRA or similar state laws, we will reduce the interest rate on the Borrower Loan to 6% for the duration of the borrower’s active duty. During this period, the investors who have invested in such Borrower Loan will not receive the difference between 6% and the Borrower Loan’s original interest rate. For a borrower to obtain an interest rate reduction on a Borrower Loan due to military service, we require the borrower to send us a written request and written documentation of active duty. We do not take military service into account in assigning Prosper Ratings to borrower loan requests and we do not disclose the military status of borrowers to investors.  
Military Lending Act. The federal Military Lending Act (“MLA”) provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions. Although originally enacted in 2006, the MLA applies to persons engaged in the business of extending consumer credit subject to the disclosure requirements of the TILA and Regulation Z with respect to loans made on or after October 3, 2016. The MLA prohibits creditors from imposing a Military Annual Percentage Rate (“MAPR”) greater than 36% in any consumer credit transaction involving a covered borrower. It also requires certain oral and written disclosures to be provided to covered borrowers. Additionally, the MLA prohibits creditors from requiring covered borrowers to waive rights to legal recourse, submit to arbitration, or pay a prepayment penalty or fee. Both we and WebBank have ensured that the loan program complies with the MLA requirements for covered borrowers,
16




including but not limited to the restriction on MAPR, the delivery of required disclosures and the prohibition of mandatory arbitration and waiver of legal recourse.
Other Lending Regulations. We are subject to and seek to comply with other state and federal laws and regulations applicable to consumer lending, including additional requirements relating to loan disclosure, credit discrimination, credit reporting, debt collection and unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices. These laws and regulations may be enforced by state consumer credit regulatory agencies, state attorneys general, the CFPB and private litigants, among others. Given our novel business model and the subjective nature of some of these laws and regulations, particularly laws regulating unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices, we may become subject to regulatory scrutiny or legal challenge with respect to our compliance with these requirements.
Electronic Funds Transfer Act. The federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”), and Regulation E, which implements it, provide guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts. In addition, transfers performed by ACH electronic transfers are subject to detailed timing and notification rules and guidelines administered by the National Automated Clearinghouse Association (“NACHA”). Most transfers of funds in connection with the origination and repayment of the Borrower Loans are performed by ACH. We obtain necessary electronic authorization from borrowers and investors for such transfers in compliance with such rules. Transfers of funds through our marketplace are currently executed by Wells Fargo and conform to the EFTA, its regulations and NACHA guidelines.  
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act/Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (“ESIGN”) and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“UETA”), authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures. ESIGN and UETA require businesses that want to use electronic records or signatures in consumer transactions to obtain the consumer’s consent to receive information electronically. When a borrower or individual investor registers with our marketplace, we obtain his or her consent to transact business electronically and maintain electronic records in compliance with ESIGN and UETA requirements.  
Privacy and Data Security Laws. The federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) limits the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information. Additional state and federal privacy and data security laws require safeguards to protect the privacy and security of consumers’ personally identifiable information, require notification to affected customers in the event of a breach, and restrict certain sharing of nonpublic personal information about a consumer with affiliated entities. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020, provides consumers in the state with rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by businesses that are a certain size or that generate at least half of their revenue by selling personal information. In turn, the CCPA requires subject businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for timely responding to consumer requests submitted in exercise of their rights under the statute, although the CCPA includes certain exceptions for personal information that is protected under GLBA or other federal and state privacy laws. We maintain a detailed privacy policy that is designed to address GLBA and the CCPA and is accessible from our website. These provisions of the CCPA will be further strengthened by provisions of the California Privacy Rights Act that will become operative January 1, 2023. We maintain security measures designed to protect participants’ personal information, and we do not sell, rent or share such information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes unless previously agreed to by the participant or otherwise permitted by applicable law. In addition, we take a number of measures to safeguard the personal information of our borrowers and investors and to protect it against unauthorized access.  
Bank Secrecy Act. In cooperation with WebBank, we have implemented an anti-money laundering policy and various anti-money laundering procedures to comply with applicable federal law. With respect to new borrowers and investors, we apply the customer identification and verification program rules and screen names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Asset Control’s (“OFAC”) pursuant to the USA PATRIOT Act amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) and its implementing regulation.
Credit Card State and Federal Laws and Regulations
The Credit Card product operates under a similar bank partnership model as our personal loan marketplace, whereby through the application of Section 521 of DIDA, Section 85 of the NBA, and federal case law, Coastal may “export” the interest rate permitted under the laws of the State of Washington, where Coastal is located, regardless of the usury limitations imposed by the state law of the cardholder’s state of residence unless the state has chosen to opt out of the exportation regime. State privacy and data security laws, including the CCPA, also apply to the Credit Card product.
The Credit Card product is subject to the same federal laws and regulations applicable to our personal loan marketplace and as summarized above, including the Dodd-Frank Act, TILA, ECOA, FCRA, FDCPA, SCRA, MLA, EFTA, ESIGN, UETA, GLBA, BSA and OFAC. TILA and Regulation Z contain specific disclosure requirements for credit cards and
17




advertising rules for credit cards. Please refer to the “Government Regulations—Personal Loan State and Federal Laws and Regulations” section above for a summary of these federal laws and regulations. Certain amendments to TILA also govern the Credit Card product, including the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (the “CARD Act”), which amended TILA to prescribe, among other things, additional procedures, disclosures, fee limits, and other protections for consumers applying for or holding credit cards, and the Fair Credit Billing Act (“FCBA”), which governs creditor obligations with respect to billing complaints and errors. For the Credit Card product, we take a similar approach to compliance for our personal loan marketplace, with adjustments for application of the rules to open-ended, unsecured credit cards as opposed to closed-end personal loans.We work with Coastal to facilitate compliance.
HELOC State and Federal Laws and Regulations
The HELOC product is subject to many of the same federal laws and regulations as the personal loan marketplace, including the Dodd-Frank Act, TILA, ECOA, FCRA, ESIGN, GLBA, BSA and OFAC. TILA and Regulation Z contain specific disclosure requirements for HELOCs and mortgage advertising rules.State mortgage broker and mortgage lender licensing and registration requirements also apply to the HELOC product, which must satisfy the minimum standards set forth in the federal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 and Regulation H, as well as state usury laws. State privacy and data security laws, including the CCPA, also apply to the HELOC product.
The HELOC product is also subject to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”) and its implementing regulation, Regulation X, as well as related guidance issued by the CFPB and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). RESPA, among other things, prohibits the payment or acceptance of referral fees or kickbacks, or any splitting of fees except for actual services performed. The TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure does not apply to HELOCs. The RESPA and Regulation X mortgage servicing rules do not apply to HELOCs.
Finally, the HELOC product is subject to the data collection and reporting requirements of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (the “HMDA”) and its implementing regulation, Regulation C. Prosper is not directly subject to the HMDA data collection and reporting requirements, but collects data to support the reporting requirements applicable to its financial institution partner.
Foreign Laws and Regulations
We do not permit non-U.S. based individuals to register as borrowers on our marketplace and the marketplace does not operate outside the United States. Therefore, we do not believe that our marketplace is subject to foreign laws or regulations.
Summary of Risk Factors
We are subject to various risks, the most significant of which are summarized below. For more information about these and other risks that may affect us, you should carefully read the factors described in the “Risk Factors” section below.

Risks related to personal loan borrower default

The Notes are risky and speculative investments for suitable investors only.
Payments on the Notes depend entirely on payments PFL receives on corresponding Borrower Loans. If a borrower fails to make any payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan related to a Note, payments on such Note will be correspondingly reduced. If payments on the Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note become more than 30 days overdue, such investor will be unlikely to receive the full principal and interest payments that were expected on the Note.
Borrowers may not view or treat their obligations to PFL as having the same significance as loans from traditional lending sources.
The credit information of an applicant may be inaccurate or may not accurately reflect the applicant’s creditworthiness, which may cause an investor to lose all or part of the price paid for a Note. The fact that we have the exclusive right and ability to investigate claims of identity theft in the origination of Borrower Loans creates a significant conflict of interest between us and our investors.
The Borrower Loans are not secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by any third party, and investors must rely on us or a third-party collection agency to pursue collection against any borrower.
The Prosper Rating may not accurately set forth the risks of investing in the Notes, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will come within the estimated average annualized loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating, and investors have limited rights to cause Prosper to repurchase the Notes.
We may not set appropriate interest rates for Borrower Loans.
Investors who use the Recurring Investment or Auto Invest tools may face additional risk of funding Borrower Loans that have been erroneously selected by the tool.
18




The Borrower Loans do not restrict borrowers from incurring additional unsecured or secured debt, nor do they impose any financial restrictions on borrowers during the term of the Borrower Loan, which may reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the full principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a Note.
In general, the Borrower Loans do not contain any cross-default or similar provisions. If a borrower defaults on any of his or her other debt obligations, our ability to collect on the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment may be substantially impaired.

Risks Inherent in investing in the Notes

The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL only and are not directly secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by PMI or any third party.
PFL is not obligated to indemnify Note holders or repurchase Notes except in limited circumstances.
Our marketplace allows a borrower to prepay a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. Borrower Loan prepayments will extinguish or limit an investor’s ability to receive additional interest payments on a Note.
We may choose or be required to implement payment and collections relief programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies or crises, which may extend or otherwise alter the repayment schedule of Borrower Loans and reduce the expected return on the corresponding Notes.
The Notes will not be listed on any securities exchange and can be held only by registered Prosper investors. Further, no trading platform for the transfer of Notes exists. Therefore, investors should be prepared to hold the Notes they purchase until maturity.
Our participation in the funding of Borrower Loans could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest.

Risks related to PFL and PMI, our marketplace and our ability to service the notes

We have experienced errors on our platform that have resulted in incorrect reporting of performance returns to Note investors. If we are unable to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors, investors could be adversely impacted.
Arrangements for back-up servicing are limited. If PMI fails to maintain operations or the Administration Agreement is rejected or terminated (in bankruptcy or otherwise), investors may experience a delay and increased cost in respect of their expected principal and interest payments on Notes, and PFL may be unable to collect and process repayments from borrowers.
PMI, in its capacity as servicer, has the authority to waive or modify the terms of a Borrower Loan without the consent of the Note holders.
We have incurred operating losses in prior years and may continue to incur net losses in the future.
PFL relies on a third-party commercial bank to process transactions. If PFL is unable to continue utilizing these services, its business and ability to service the Notes may be adversely affected.
Any significant disruption in service in our marketplace or in PMI’s computer systems could adversely affect PMI’s ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement. If the security of PFL’s investors’ and borrowers’ confidential information stored in our systems is breached, users’ secure information may be stolen, our reputations may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liability.

Risks related to compliance and regulation

Our marketplace represents a novel approach to borrowing and investing that may fail to comply with federal and state securities laws, borrower protection laws and the state counterparts to such consumer protection laws. Borrowers may dispute the enforceability of their obligations under borrower or consumer protection laws after collection actions have commenced, or otherwise seek damages under these laws. Investors may attempt to rescind their Note purchases under securities laws. Regulatory agencies and their state counterparts may investigate our compliance with these regulatory obligations, and may take enforcement action with respect to alleged law violations. There continues to be uncertainty as to how the actions of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or any other new agency could impact our business or that of our issuing bank. If our marketplace were found to violate a state’s usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed. If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Company Act or the Investment Advisers Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected. Several lawsuits have sought to recharacterize certain loan marketers and other originators as lenders. If litigation or a regulatory enforcement action on similar theories were successful against one or both of PMI and PFL, Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace could be subject to state consumer protection laws and licensing requirements in a greater number of states.
We rely on agreements with WebBank, pursuant to which WebBank originates loans to qualified borrowers on a uniform basis throughout the United States and sells and assigns those loans to PFL. If our relationship with WebBank were to end, we may need to rely on individual state lending licenses to originate Borrower Loans.
19




PMI's administration of Quick Invest under its previous offering and PFL’s administration of Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, and Auto Invest under its current offering, could create additional liability for PFL and such liability could be material.
Recent Developments
COVID-19
We continue to track the impact of COVID-19 and its variants on our communities, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to 4 monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment may continue as long as the pandemic continues to trigger financial hardship for borrowers.
Available Information
The following filings are available for download free of charge at www.prosper.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such filings are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC’s website, at www.sec.gov. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, when evaluating our business. Any of the following risks, either alone or taken together, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. While we believe the risks and uncertainties described below include all material risks currently known by us, it is possible that these may not be the only ones we face.
RISKS RELATED TO PERSONAL LOAN BORROWER DEFAULT
The Notes are risky and speculative investments for suitable investors only.
Investors should be aware that the Notes offered through our marketplace are risky and speculative investments. The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL and depend entirely for payment on PFL’s receipt of payments under the corresponding Borrower Loans. Notes are suitable only for investors of adequate financial means. If an investor cannot afford to lose the entire amount of such investor’s investment in the Notes, the investor should not invest in the Notes.
Payments on the Notes depend entirely on payments PFL receives on corresponding Borrower Loans. If a borrower fails to make any payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan related to a Note, payments on such Note will be correspondingly reduced.
PFL will only make payments pro-rata on a series of Notes after it receives a borrower’s payment on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of servicing fees. PFL also will retain from the funds received from the relevant borrower and otherwise available for payment on the Notes any non-sufficient funds fees and the amounts of any attorneys’ fees or collection fees our in-house collections department, a third-party servicer or collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts. Under the terms of the Notes, if PFL does not receive any or all payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan, payments on the Note will be correspondingly reduced in whole or in part. If the relevant borrower does not make a payment on a specific monthly loan payment date, no payment will be made on the Note on the corresponding succeeding Note payment date.
The Borrower Loans are not secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by any third party, and investors must rely on us or a third-party collection agency to pursue collection against any borrower.
Borrower Loans are unsecured obligations of borrowers. They are not secured by any collateral, and they are not guaranteed or insured by PFL, PMI or any third party, or backed by any governmental authority in any way. We and our third-party collection agencies will, therefore, be limited in our ability to collect on Borrower Loans. Moreover, Borrower Loans are obligations of borrowers to PFL as successor to WebBank, not obligations to the holders of Notes. Holders of the Notes will
20




have no recourse to the borrowers and no ability to pursue borrowers to collect payments under Borrower Loans. Holders of the Notes may look only to PFL for payment of the Notes. Furthermore, if a borrower fails to make any payments on the Borrower Loan, the holders of the Notes corresponding to that Borrower Loan will not receive any payments on their Notes. The holders of such Notes will not be able to pursue collection against the borrower and will not be able to obtain the identity of the borrower in order to contact the borrower about the defaulted Borrower Loan.
The credit information of an applicant may be inaccurate or may not accurately reflect the applicant’s creditworthiness, which may cause an investor to lose all or part of the price paid for a Note.
We obtain applicant credit information from consumer reporting agencies, and assign Prosper Ratings to listings based in part on the applicant’s credit score. A credit score that forms a part of the Prosper Rating assigned to a listing may not reflect the applicant’s actual creditworthiness because the credit score may be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. Similarly, the credit data taken from the applicant’s credit report and displayed in listings may also be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. We do not verify the information obtained from the applicant’s credit report. Moreover, investors do not, and will not, have access to financial statements of applicants or to other detailed financial information about applicants.
The Prosper Rating may not accurately set forth the risks of investing in the Notes, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will come within the estimated average annualized loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating, and investors have limited rights to cause Prosper to repurchase the Notes.
The Prosper Rating assigned to a loan listing may not accurately reflect the risks of investing in the Notes, and is not a recommendation by us to buy or hold a Note. For example, the Prosper Rating for a listing could be inaccurate because the applicant’s credit report contained incorrect information. Similarly, although some of the information provided by applicants that is relevant to the Prosper Rating is verified by us before calculating the Prosper Rating, we do not verify all such information. For example, we do not verify the income or employment information on all applications. Further, the Prosper Rating does not reflect PFL’s credit risk as a debtor (such credit risk exists even though, as the debtor on the Notes, PFL’s only obligation is to pay to the Note holders their pro-rata shares of collections received on the related Borrower Loans net of applicable fees). In addition, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will fall within the expected loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating. The interest rates on the Notes might not adequately compensate Note investors for these additional risks.
If we include in a listing a Prosper Rating that is different from the Prosper Rating calculated by us or calculate the Prosper Rating for a listing incorrectly, and such error materially and adversely affects a holder’s interest in the related Note, PFL will indemnify the holder or repurchase the Note. PFL will not, however, have any indemnity or repurchase obligation under the Amended and Restated Indenture, the Notes, the Investor Registration Agreement or any other agreement associated with the Note Channel as a result of any other inaccuracy with respect to a listing’s Prosper Score or Prosper Rating. PFL’s contractual repurchase obligations do not affect a Note holder’s rights under federal or state securities laws.
Investors who use the Recurring Investment or Auto Invest tools may face additional risk of funding Borrower Loans that have been erroneously selected by the tool.
Since it was first implemented in July 2011 through December 31, 2021, the Recurring Investment (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) tool has experienced programming errors that affected 8,630 Notes and PMI Notes out of the 11,999,556 Notes and PMI Notes purchased. The Auto Invest tool was first implemented on June 2, 2016. Since such time through December 31, 2021, the Auto Invest tool has experienced programming errors that affected 2 Notes out of the 8,583,286 Notes purchased.
In the event of any errors in Recurring Investment or Auto Invest that cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note such investor would have purchased had there been no error, PFL will either repurchase the Note, indemnify the investor against losses suffered on that Note or cure such error. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to PFL and PMI, Our Marketplace and Our Ability to Service the Notes” for more information.
Some borrowers may use our marketplace to defraud investors, which could adversely affect investors’ ability to recoup their investment.
We use identity and fraud checks with external databases to authenticate each borrower’s identity. There is a risk, however, that these checks could fail and fraud may occur. In addition, applicants may misrepresent their intentions regarding loan purpose or other information contained in listings, and we do not verify the majority of this information. While PFL will indemnify an investor or repurchase Notes in limited circumstances (including, e.g., a material payment default on the Borrower Loan resulting from verifiable identity theft), it is not obligated to indemnify an investor or repurchase a Note from an investor if the investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud (other than verifiable identity theft) in connection with a loan listing, or due to false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a listing, whether in credit data, a borrower’s
21




representations, similar indicators of borrower intent and ability to repay the Borrower Loan. If PFL repurchases a Note, the repurchase price will be equal to the Note's outstanding principal balance and will not include accrued interest. If PFL repurchases any Notes, PMI will concurrently repurchase the related PMI Management Rights for zero consideration.
The fact that we have the exclusive right and ability to investigate claims of identity theft in the origination of Borrower Loans creates a significant conflict of interest between us and our investors.
We have the exclusive right to investigate claims of identity theft and determine, in our sole discretion, whether verifiable identity theft has occurred. Such a determination of verifiable identity theft may trigger an obligation by PFL to either repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans or indemnify the applicable Note holders. The denial of a claim under PFL’s identity theft guarantee would save PFL from its indemnification or repurchase obligation. Because investors rely solely on us to investigate incidents that might require PFL to indemnify the applicable Note holders or repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans, a conflict of interest exists between us and such investors.
If payments on the Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note become more than 30 days overdue, such investor will be unlikely to receive the full principal and interest payments that were expected on the Note, and such investor may not recover the original purchase price on the Note.
We may refer Borrower Loans that become past due to a third party collection agency for collection or we may collect on such Borrower Loans directly. If a borrower fails to make a required payment on a Borrower Loan within 30 days of the due date, we will pursue reasonable collection efforts in respect of the Borrower Loan. Referral of a delinquent Borrower Loan to a collection agency within five business days after it becomes 30 days past due will be considered reasonable collection efforts. If payment amounts on a delinquent Borrower Loan are received from a borrower after the loan has been referred to our in-house collections department or an outside collection agency, we or that collection agency may retain a percentage of that payment as a fee before any principal or interest becomes payable to an investor. Collection fees may be up to 40% of recovered amounts, in addition to any legal fees and transaction fees associated with accepting payments incurred in the collection effort.
For some non-performing Borrower Loans, we may not be able to recover any of the unpaid loan balance and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive little, if any, of the unpaid principal and interest payable under the Note. In all cases, investors must rely on our collection efforts or the applicable collection agency to which such Borrower Loans are referred, and are not permitted to collect or attempt collection of payments on the Borrower Loans in any manner.
Loss rates on the Borrower Loans may increase as a result of economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of the borrower, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Borrower Loan loss rates may be significantly affected by economic downturns or general economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of individual borrowers. In particular, loss rates on Borrower Loans may increase due to factors such as prevailing interest rates, the rate of unemployment, the level of consumer confidence, residential real estate values, the value of the U.S. dollar, energy prices, changes in consumer spending, the number of personal bankruptcies, disruptions in the credit markets, natural disasters, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and other factors.
The Borrower Loans do not restrict borrowers from incurring additional unsecured or secured debt, nor do they impose any financial restrictions on borrowers during the term of the Borrower Loan, which may reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the full principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a Note.
If a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted, the additional debt may impair the ability of that borrower to make payments on his or her Borrower Loan and, as such, reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a corresponding Note. Moreover, the additional debt may adversely affect the borrower’s creditworthiness generally, and could result in the financial distress, insolvency, or bankruptcy of the borrower. To the extent that the borrower has or incurs other indebtedness and cannot pay all of his or her indebtedness, the borrower may choose to make payments to other creditors, rather than to PFL.
To the extent borrowers incur other indebtedness that is secured, such as a mortgage, a home equity line or an auto loan, the ability of the secured creditors to exercise remedies against the assets of the borrower may impair the borrower’s ability to repay the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment. Borrowers may also choose to repay obligations under secured indebtedness or other unsecured indebtedness before repaying Borrower Loans because there is no collateral securing the Borrower Loans. An investor will not be notified if a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted.
22




Borrowers may be more likely to incur additional unsecured or secured debt in an effort to mitigate economic disruption, which may further reduce their likelihood of repaying Borrower Loans.
The economic disruption caused by inflation, issues in the supply chain of goods, and changes in the labor market due to the global spread of COVID-19 have affected both consumers and small businesses, self-employed individuals and independent contractors whose livelihoods depend on providing in-person goods and services.
In response to the global spread of COVID-19, in March 2020 Congress enacted and the president signed into law the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The relief measures provided by these laws include expanding eligibility criteria for Small Business Administration loan programs. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic and legislation passed in response to the pandemic result in borrowers incurring additional debt above and beyond ordinary levels, borrowers’ overall ability to repay Borrower Loans may be further impaired.
Borrowers may not view or treat their obligations to PFL as having the same significance as loans from traditional lending sources.
The investment return on the Notes depends on borrowers fulfilling their payment obligations in a timely and complete manner under the corresponding Borrower Loan. Borrowers may not view marketplace lending obligations originated through our marketplace as having the same significance as other credit obligations arising under more traditional circumstances. If a borrower neglects his or her payment obligations on a Borrower Loan upon which payment of an investor’s Note is dependent or chooses not to repay his or her Borrower Loan entirely, such investor may not be able to recover any portion of the investment in a Note.
Our marketplace may fail to comply with applicable law, which could limit our ability to collect on Borrower Loans.
The Borrower Loans are subject to federal and state consumer protection laws. Our marketplace may not always be, and may not always have been, in compliance with these laws. Failure to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements applicable to our marketplace may, among other things, limit our or a collection agency's ability to collect all or part of the principal of or interest on Borrower Loans.
We regularly review the requirements of these laws and take measures aimed at ensuring that the Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace meet the requirements of all applicable laws. However, determining compliance with all applicable laws is a complex matter and it is possible that our determination may be inaccurate or incorrect. Also, changes in law, either due to court decisions, regulatory interpretations or rulings, or new legislation, may adversely affect the collectability of a Borrower Loan.
In general, the Borrower Loans do not contain any cross-default or similar provisions. If a borrower defaults on any of his or her other debt obligations, our ability to collect on the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment may be substantially impaired.
The Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions. A cross-default provision makes a default under certain debt of a borrower an automatic default on other debt of that borrower. Because the Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions, a Borrower Loan will not be placed automatically in default upon that borrower’s default on any of the borrower’s other debt obligations. If a borrower defaults on debt obligations owed to a third party and continues to satisfy the payment obligations under the Borrower Loan, the third party may seize the borrower’s assets or pursue other legal action against the borrower before the borrower defaults on the Borrower Loan, which may affect our ability to collect from the borrower when or if the Borrower Loan becomes delinquent.
Borrowers may seek the protection of debtor relief under federal bankruptcy or state insolvency laws, which may result in the nonpayment of an investor’s Notes.
Borrowers may seek protection under federal bankruptcy law or similar laws. If a borrower files for bankruptcy (or becomes the subject of an involuntary petition), a stay will go into effect that will automatically put any pending collection actions on the Borrower Loan on hold and prevent further collection action absent bankruptcy court approval. If we receive notice that a borrower has filed for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws, or has become the subject of an involuntary bankruptcy petition, we will put the borrower’s account into “bankruptcy status.” When this occurs, we terminate automatic monthly ACH debits on the Borrower Loan and we will not undertake collection activity without bankruptcy court approval. Whether any payment will ultimately be made or received on a Borrower Loan after a bankruptcy status is declared depends on the borrower’s particular financial situation. In most cases, however, unsecured creditors such as PFL receive nothing, or only a fraction of their outstanding debt and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive none or very little of the unpaid principal and interest payable on the Note.
Federal law entitles borrowers who enter active military service to an interest rate cap and certain other rights that may inhibit the ability to collect on Borrower Loans and reduce the amount of interest paid on the corresponding Notes.
23




Federal law provides borrowers on active military service with rights that may delay or impair our ability to collect on a Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) and other similar state laws require that the interest rate on preexisting debts, such as Borrower Loans, be set at no more than 6% while the qualified service member or reservist is on active duty. A holder of a Note that is dependent on such a Borrower Loan for payment will not receive the difference between 6% and the original stated interest rate for the Borrower Loan during any such period. The SCRA also permits courts to stay proceedings and the execution of judgments against service members and reservists on active duty, which may delay recovery on any Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments on the corresponding Notes.
Beginning October 3, 2016, the Military Lending Act (“MLA”) prohibits requiring covered borrowers, which include active military servicemembers and their dependents, to waive the right to legal recourse or to submit to arbitration. This may delay recovery on any relevant Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments on the corresponding Notes.
If there are any amounts under such a Borrower Loan still due and owing to PFL after the final maturity of the corresponding Notes, PFL will have no further obligation to make payments on such Notes, even if it receives payments on the Borrower Loan after the final maturity of such Notes. We do not take military service into account in assigning a Prosper Rating to loan listings. In addition, as part of the borrower registration process, we do not request borrowers to confirm if they are qualified service members or reservists within the meaning of the SCRA or the MLA. See Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information.
As of December 31, 2021, 76 Borrower Loans, with a total outstanding balance of $0.6 million are subject to the SCRA.
The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.
The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule, which in certain circumstances permits borrowers to assert any claims and defenses that they would have had against a seller of goods or services obtained with the proceeds of a loan against an originator or subsequent purchaser of the loan, could allow certain borrowers to raise such defenses against PFL to the extent of the outstanding loan balance. If such defenses are successfully raised, PFL will be unable to collect on the loan and it is unlikely that any further payment will be made on the corresponding Notes.
The death of a borrower may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.
If a borrower dies with an outstanding Borrower Loan, PFL is required, upon receiving notice of the death, to stop accepting automatic loan payments and to refund any payments that were automatically debited after the borrower's date of death. Though we may seek to work with the executor of the borrower’s estate to obtain repayment of the loan, the borrower’s estate may not contain sufficient assets to repay the loan, or its executor may prioritize repayment of other creditors. In addition, if a borrower dies near the end of the term of his or her Borrower Loan, the time required for the probate of the borrower’s estate will likely extend beyond the Notes’ final maturity date, after which date PFL will cease to have any obligation to make payments on the Notes.
RISKS INHERENT IN INVESTING IN THE NOTES
The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL only and are not directly secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by PMI or any third party.
The Notes will not represent an obligation of borrowers, PMI or any other party except PFL, and are special, limited obligations of PFL. The Notes are not guaranteed or insured by PMI, any governmental agency or instrumentality, or any third party. Although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in the Borrower Loans corresponding to the Notes, the payments and proceeds that PFL receives on such Borrower Loans, the bank account in which such Borrower Loan payments are deposited, and the accounts in which investors’ funding amounts are deposited, the Note holders do not themselves have a direct security interest in the Borrower Loans or the right to payment thereunder. If an event of default under the Amended and Restated Indenture were to occur, the Note holders would be dependent on the indenture trustee’s ability to realize on the collateral and make payments on the Notes in the manner contemplated by the Amended and Restated Indenture. In addition, although PFL will take all actions that it believes are required under applicable law to perfect the security interest of the indenture trustee in the collateral, if its analysis of the required actions is incorrect or if it fails to take any required action in a timely manner, the indenture trustee’s security interest may not be effective and holders of the Notes could be required to share the collateral (and any proceeds thereof) with PFL’s other creditors, or, if a bankruptcy court were to order the substantive consolidation of PMI and PFL (as described below), PMI’s creditors.
PFL is not obligated to indemnify Note holders or repurchase Notes except in limited circumstances.
24




PFL is only obligated to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes in limited circumstances. These circumstances include if (i) a material payment default under the corresponding Borrower Loan occurs as a result of verifiable identify theft; (ii) we include a Prosper Rating in a listing that is different from the Prosper Rating we calculated, or we calculate the Prosper Rating incorrectly; or (iii) any errors in Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, or Auto Invest cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note, in which cases PFL also has the option to cure such error. PFL is not required to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes, however, if the Note holder’s investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud other than verified identity theft, or due to other false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a listing, whether in credit data, borrower representations or similar indicia of borrower intent and ability to repay the loan. Further, PFL is under no obligation to repurchase a Note or indemnify any holder of Notes if a correctly determined Prosper Rating fails to accurately predict the actual losses on a Borrower Loan.
PFL might incur indemnification and repurchase obligations that exceed its projections, in which case it may not have sufficient liquidity to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations.
PFL believes its liquidity will be sufficient to meet its reasonably anticipated indemnification and repurchase obligations. In determining its expected liquidity needs with respect to indemnification and repurchase obligations, PFL considers the history of such obligations incurred by it and PMI. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that if PFL is obligated to repurchase a Note or indemnify a Note holder, that it will be able to meet its repurchase or indemnification obligations. If PFL is unable to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations with respect to a Note, the investor in such Note may lose all of such investor’s investment in the Note.
Our marketplace allows a borrower to prepay a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. Borrower Loan prepayments will extinguish or limit an investor’s ability to receive additional interest payments on a Note.
Borrower Loan prepayment occurs when a borrower decides to pay some or all of the principal amount on a Borrower Loan earlier than originally scheduled. Borrowers may decide to prepay all or a portion of the remaining principal amount due under a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. In the event of a prepayment of the entire remaining unpaid principal amount of a Borrower Loan, each of the holders of the Notes corresponding to the Borrower Loan will receive his or her share of such prepayment but further interest will not accrue on such Borrower Loan or on such Note after the date on which the payment is made. If the borrower prepays a portion of the remaining unpaid principal balance, the term of the Borrower Loan will not change, but interest will cease to accrue on the prepaid portion. If a borrower prepays a Borrower Loan in whole or in part, an investor will not receive all of the interest payments that such investor originally expected to receive on the Note corresponding to such Borrower Loan. In addition, such investor may not be able to find a similar rate of return on another investment at the time at which the Borrower Loan is prepaid. Prepayments are subject to PFL’s servicing fee, even if the prepayment occurs immediately after issuance of a Note.
Prevailing interest rates may change during the term of the Notes. If this occurs, investors may receive less value from the purchase of Notes in comparison to other ways they may invest their money. Additionally, borrowers may prepay their Borrower Loans due to changes in interest rates, and investors may not be able to redeploy the amounts received from prepayments in a way that offers the return expected from the Notes.
The Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for payment bear fixed, not floating, rates of interest. If prevailing interest rates increase, the interest rates on Notes investors purchase might be less than the rate of return they could earn if they had invested the purchase price in a different investment.
We may not set appropriate interest rates for Borrower Loans.
We set interest rates for all Borrower Loans based on Prosper Ratings, as well as additional factors such as Borrower Loan terms, the economic environment and competitive conditions. If we set interest rates for Borrower Loans too low, investors may not be compensated appropriately for the level of risk that they are assuming in purchasing Notes, while setting the interest rate too high may increase the risk of non-payment. In either case, a failure by us to set rates appropriately may adversely impact the ability of investors to receive returns on their Notes that are commensurate with the risks they have assumed in acquiring such Notes.
The Notes will not be listed on any securities exchange and can be held only by registered Prosper investors. Further, no trading platform for the transfer of Notes exists and there can be no assurance a trading platform for the transfer of Notes will develop in the future. Therefore, investors should be prepared to hold the Notes they purchase until maturity.
The Notes and PMI Management Rights will not be listed on any securities exchange and all Notes and PMI Management Rights must be held by registered Prosper investors. Further, in connection with the termination of our relationship with FOLIO Investments, Inc. in October 2016, a trading platform for the transfer of Notes and PMI Management Rights no longer exists. While we may, in our sole discretion, permit the establishment of another platform on which a secondary market may be made with respect to the Notes, there can be no assurance a trading platform for the Notes and PMI
25




Management Rights will develop in the future. Therefore, Note purchasers must be prepared to hold their Notes and PMI Management Rights to maturity.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Notes are uncertain.
There are no statutory provisions, regulations, published rulings or judicial decisions that directly address the characterization of the Notes or instruments similar to the Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, although the matter is not free from doubt because payments on the Notes are dependent on payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan, PFL treats the Notes as debt instruments that have original issue discount (“OID”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Where required, PFL intends to file informational returns with the IRS in accordance with such treatment unless there is a change or clarification in the law, by regulation or otherwise, that would require a different characterization of the Notes. Investors should be aware, however, that the IRS is not bound by PFL’s characterization of the Notes and the IRS or a court may take a different position with respect to the Notes’ proper characterization. For example, the IRS could determine that, in substance, each investor owns a proportionate interest in the corresponding Borrower Loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes or, for example, the IRS could instead treat the Notes as a different financial instrument (including an equity interest or a derivative financial instrument). Any different characterization could significantly affect the amount, timing, and character of income, gain or loss recognized in respect of a Note. For example, if the Notes are treated as PFL’s equity, (i) PFL would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income, including interest, accrued on the corresponding Borrower Loans but would not be entitled to deduct interest or OID on the Notes, and (ii) payments on the Notes would be treated by the Note holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes as dividends (that may be ineligible for reduced rates of U.S. federal income taxation or the dividends-received deduction) to the extent of PFL’s earnings and profits as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A different characterization may significantly reduce the amount available to pay interest on the Notes. Investors are strongly advised to consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the Notes (including any possible differing treatments of the Notes).
PFL’s ability to pay principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability to match the timing of its income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Investors should be aware that PFL’s ability to pay principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to match the timing of income it receives from a corresponding Borrower Loan that it holds and the timing of deductions that it may be entitled to in respect of payments made on the Notes that it issues. For example, if the Notes are treated as contingent payment debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes but the corresponding Borrower Loans are not, there could be a potential mismatch in the timing of PFL’s income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and PFL’s resulting tax liabilities could affect its ability to make payments on the Notes.
Our participation in the funding of Borrower Loans could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest.
As is the practice with other marketplace lending companies, from time to time, we may fund portions of qualified loan requests in our marketplace and hold any Notes purchased as a result of such funding for our own individual accounts. Even though we will participate in funding Borrower Loans listed in our marketplace under the same terms and conditions and through the use of the same information that is made available to other potential investors in our marketplace, such participation may be perceived as involving a conflict of interest. For example, our funding of a Borrower Loan may cause the loan to fund, and in some cases, fund faster, than it would fund in the absence of our participation, which could benefit us to the extent that it ensures that we generate the revenue associated with the loan.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we purchased $0.1 million in Notes for investment.
We may choose or be required to implement payment and collections relief programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies or crises, which may extend or otherwise alter the repayment schedule of Borrower Loans and reduce the expected return on the corresponding Notes.
The global spread of COVID-19 has caused significant market volatility and workforce disruptions. We recognize the serious economic hardship triggered by COVID-19, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to 4 monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months total and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. We are also complying with new state mandates that may temporarily impact collections activity with respect to delinquent loans.
Our COVID-19 payment relief programs may impact the repayment schedule and terms of Borrower Loans and the returns received on corresponding Notes. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment and subsequent loan performance may fluctuate as long as the pandemic continues to trigger increased work stoppages and unemployment.
26




Likewise, to the extent we are required to comply with state mandates to pause collections activity on delinquent loans, investors will not receive recoveries on any Notes corresponding to Borrower Loans that cannot be collected upon while such mandates are in effect. We continue to actively monitor the impact of COVID-19 on economic conditions.   
RISKS RELATED TO PFL AND PMI, OUR MARKETPLACE AND OUR ABILITY TO SERVICE THE NOTES
We have experienced errors on our platform that have resulted in incorrect reporting of performance returns to Note investors. If we are unable to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors, investors could be adversely impacted.
In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors, which resulted from errors in the code forming part of our calculation framework. On average, the error resulted in Note investors being shown annualized net return information that was approximately 260 basis points higher than the actual performance of Notes in their accounts. The error did not affect any other part of Note investors’ accounts, nor did it affect any other aspects of the platform, including the receipt and distribution of loan payments, deposits, monthly statements or tax documentation, or the Note and loan level information provided to investors. Following an SEC investigation, we entered into a settlement with the SEC to resolve the matter on April 19, 2019. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a negligence-based violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. PFL paid the penalty in full on April 24, 2019.
The error reveals a risk associated with the complex programs, algorithms and inputs that support our platform. We depend on these programs, algorithms and inputs to store, retrieve, process and manage data, as well as to provide marketplace features such as our credit assessments and underwriting, the Prosper Rating, historical returns, and individual Note, Note portfolio and platform-wide performance data. Errors or other design defects within these programs, algorithms and inputs may result in a negative experience for borrowers and investors, delay introductions of new features or enhancements, or impact the information displayed on our website. They could also result in negative publicity and unfavorable media coverage, harm to our reputation, litigation, regulatory inquiries or proceedings, loss of or damage to our relationships with borrowers or investors, or loss of revenue or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Arrangements for back-up servicing are limited. If PMI fails to maintain operations or the Administration Agreement is rejected or terminated (in bankruptcy or otherwise), investors may experience a delay and increased cost in respect of their expected principal and interest payments on Notes, and PFL may be unable to collect and process repayments from borrowers.
If the Administration Agreement (or the loan servicing provisions thereof) are terminated for any reason (whether as a result of PMI’s bankruptcy, non-performance or otherwise), PFL would attempt to transfer the loan servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and Notes to a third party pursuant to its contractual agreements with investors.
PFL has entered into a back-up servicing agreement with a loan servicing company that is willing and able to transition servicing responsibilities from PMI. There can be no assurance, however, that this back-up servicer will be able to adequately perform the servicing of the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes. If this back-up servicer assumes the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes, the back-up servicer may impose additional servicing fees (up to the maximums we have negotiated), reducing the amounts available for payments on the Notes. Additionally, transferring these servicing obligations to the back-up servicer may result in delays in the processing of collections on Borrower Loans and information with respect to amounts owed on Borrower Loans. If the back-up servicer is not able to service the Borrower Loans and Notes effectively, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on their Notes may be substantially impaired, even if their portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the corresponding Borrower Loans are paying on schedule.
In addition, it is unlikely that the back-up servicer would be able to perform functions other than servicing the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, such as facilitating the creation of new Borrower Loans through our marketplace, or managing PFL’s marketing efforts. PFL believes that it could find one or more other parties who could perform these and any other functions necessary to fully operate our marketplace in the absence of PMI. However, this process, and any related onboarding of such party or parties, will take time. Any such delay or impairment that does not affect existing Note holders, because PFL or its back-up servicer proves able to continue servicing outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, could nonetheless delay PFL’s ability to facilitate the origination of new Borrower Loans and issue new Notes through our marketplace, which could adversely affect PFL’s finances and customer relationships.
A decline in economic conditions may adversely affect our customers, which may negatively impact our business and results of operations.
As a lending marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to
27




participate in our marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect our business and results of operations. For more information about risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic, see “—Public health emergencies and other events beyond our control may damage our ability to continue operations without disruptions, including our ability to attract new borrowers and investors, retain existing investors, as well as the ability of existing borrowers to repay their loans. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.”
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace.
A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace. If these investors cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our personal loan marketplace and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our business could be adversely affected by a weakening market for securities backed by consumer assets.
PFL is involved in the securitization market through: (i) its business of selling loans to investors who, in turn, sell asset backed securities based on accumulated loan portfolios and (ii) securitization of loans retained by affiliates of PFL. If the market for asset backed securities based on consumer assets weakens, investors may cease or significantly decrease their funding of Borrower Loans through our marketplace and if PFL has been unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding, if this were to occur, the rights of holders of the Notes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited, suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder on a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.
Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if this were to occur, the recovery, if any, of a holder of a Note may be substantially delayed in time (for example, due to the imposition of a stay on payments by the bankruptcy court) and may be substantially less in amount than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note even if a Note holder’s portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the Borrower Loans are paying on schedule. Further, although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in all of the Borrower Loans, in all payments and proceeds it receives on the corresponding Borrower Loans and in the bank account in which the Borrower Loan payments are deposited, the holders of the Notes would still be subject to risks associated with PFL’s insolvency, bankruptcy or a similar proceeding.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, borrowers may delay payments or cease making payments at all.
Borrowers may delay or suspend making payments to PFL because of the uncertainties associated with PFL becoming subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, even if the borrowers have no legal right to do so, and such delay would reduce, at least for a time, the funds that might otherwise be available to pay the Notes corresponding to those Borrower Loans. In addition, the commencement of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding may, as a matter of law, prevent PFL from making regular payments on the Notes, even if the funds to make such payments are available. Because the Indenture trustee would be required to enforce its security interest in the Borrower Loans in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, the Indenture trustee's ability to make payments under the Notes would be delayed, which may effectively reduce the value of any recovery that a holder of a Note may receive (and no such recovery can be assured) by the time any recovery is available.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, interest accruing on the Notes upon and following such bankruptcy or similar proceeding may not be paid.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, interest accruing on the Notes during the proceeding may not be part of the allowed claim of a holder of a Note. If the Note holder receives a recovery on the Note (and no such recovery can be assured), any such recovery may be based on, and limited to, the Note holder’s claim for principal and for interest accrued up to the date of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding, but not thereafter. Because a bankruptcy or similar proceeding may take months or years to complete, a claim based on principal and on interest only up to the start of the bankruptcy or similar
28




proceeding may be substantially less than a claim based on principal and on interest through the end of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding.
If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, a Note holder may not have any priority right to payment from the corresponding Borrower Loan, may not have any right to payment from funds in the applicable servicing account, and may not have any ability to access funds in the applicable funding accounts (the “FBO Funding accounts”).
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if PFL has failed to perfect the security interest in Borrower Loans, investors may be required to share the proceeds of the Borrower Loans upon which their Notes are dependent for payment with PFL’s other creditors, including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans. To the extent that proceeds of the Borrower Loans would be shared with PFL’s other creditors, any secured or priority rights of such other creditors may cause the proceeds to be distributed to such other creditors before any distribution is made to investors on the corresponding Notes.
If a payment is made on a Borrower Loan corresponding to a Note before PFL’s bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, and those funds are held in the servicing account PFL maintains with Wells Fargo to collect borrower payments and have not been used by PFL to make payments on the Note as of the date the bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, there can be no assurance that PFL will or will be able to use such funds to make payments on such Note. Other creditors of PFL (including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans) may be deemed to have rights to such funds or interests in the applicable servicing account and monies credited thereto that are equal to or greater than the rights of the holder of such Note.
Although PFL believes that amounts funded by both Whole Loan Channel and Note Channel investors into the applicable FBO Funding accounts should not be subject to claims of its creditors other than the investors for whose benefit the funds are held, the legal title to the FBO Funding accounts, and the attendant right to administer the FBO Funding accounts, would be property of PFL’s bankruptcy estate. As a result, if PFL were to file for bankruptcy protection, the legal right to administer the funds in the FBO Funding accounts would vest with the bankruptcy trustee or debtor in possession. In that case, while neither PFL nor its creditors should be able to reach those funds, the indenture trustee or the investors may have to seek a bankruptcy court order lifting the automatic stay and permitting them to withdraw their funds. Investors may suffer delays in accessing their funds in the FBO Funding accounts as a result. Moreover, United States bankruptcy courts have broad powers at law and in equity and, if PFL has failed to properly segregate or handle investors’ funds, a bankruptcy court could determine that some or all of such funds were beneficially owned by PFL and should therefore be made available to PFL’s creditors generally.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, a holder of a Note may be delayed or prevented from enforcing PFL’s repurchase obligations with respect to such Note.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, any right of a Note holder to require PFL to repurchase the Note or indemnify such Note holder under the circumstances set forth in the Investor Registration Agreement or the Note might not be enforceable, and such holder’s claim for such repurchase may be treated less favorably than a general unsecured obligation of PFL.
Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PFL were substantively consolidated in this manner, the rights of the holders of the Notes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited, suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder on a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.
Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PMI became subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding and PFL were substantively consolidated with PMI, the risks described in the immediately preceding risk factors regarding (i) payment delays, (ii) uncollectability of interest accrued during the bankruptcy proceeding, (iii) being subordinated to the interests of PFL’s other creditors, and (iv) the indenture trustee’s inability to access funds in the deposit account or the FBO Funding accounts, would all be present and, in addition, the same considerations would apply in relation to the claims of creditors of PMI, including that such creditors of PMI may be determined to have perfected security interests or unsecured claims that take precedence over or are at least equal in priority to those of creditors of PFL (including holders of Notes).
In addition, in the event of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PMI, (i) the implementation of back-up servicing arrangements may be delayed or prevented, and (ii) PMI’s ability to transfer its servicing obligations to a back-up servicer or its other corporate and marketplace administration services and marketing services to third parties may be limited and subject to the approval of the bankruptcy court or other presiding authority. The bankruptcy process may delay or prevent the implementation of back-up servicing, which may impair the collection on Borrower Loans to the detriment of Note holders.
PMI owns and did not transfer to PFL ownership of the computer hardware that it uses to host and maintain the website or agreements with third parties relating to the hosting and maintenance of the website. Although PMI’s retention of
29




such hardware and agreements should not bear on a bankruptcy court’s analysis of the legal separateness of PMI and PFL (or their respective assets and liabilities), the cessation of or substantial reduction of the day-to-day operations of PMI (because of or during its bankruptcy or otherwise) would materially impair and delay the ability of PFL or a back-up service provider to retrieve data and information in the possession of PMI and to operate our marketplace or elements thereof relevant to Borrower Loan and Note servicing.
PMI, in its capacity as servicer, has the authority to waive or modify the terms of a Borrower Loan without the consent of the Note holders.
Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PMI is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to service and collect on the Borrower Loans in accordance with industry standards. Subject to that obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to waive or modify any non-material term of a Borrower Loan, consent to the postponement of strict compliance with any such term, or in any manner grant a non-material indulgence to any borrower. In addition, if a Borrower Loan is in default, or PMI determines a default is reasonably foreseeable or that such action is consistent with its servicing obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to waive or modify a material term of a Borrower Loan, to accept payment of an amount less than the principal balance in final satisfaction of a Borrower Loan and to grant any indulgence to a borrower, provided that PMI has reasonably and prudently determined that such action will not be materially adverse to the interests of the relevant Note holders. If PMI approves a modification to the terms of any Borrower Loan it must promptly notify the corresponding Note holders in each Note holder's account.
There can be no assurance that PMI, in its capacity as servicer, will be able to collect the principal amount or interest rate agreed to and/or sell charged off Borrower Loans in the future as a result of business, regulatory or other considerations.
We have incurred operating losses in prior years and may continue to incur net losses in the future.
We have incurred operating losses in prior years and may continue to incur net losses in the future. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we incurred a loss of $138.3 million and generated income of $18.6 million, respectively. Additionally, from our inception through December 31, 2021, we have had an accumulated deficit of $554.3 million.
We have financed our operations to date primarily with proceeds from the sale of equity securities. At December 31, 2021, we had approximately $67.7 million unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. PMI is dependent upon raising additional capital or debt financing to fund its current operating plan if it cannot generate sufficient positive cash flow from operations. PMI’s failure to achieve positive cash flow from operations or obtain sufficient debt and equity financing, could adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.
Although our business has grown, we may be unable to manage our growth effectively and meet the demands that such growth places on our facilities, employees and infrastructure.  
As the number of borrowers, investors and Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace increases, PMI will need to increase its facilities, personnel and infrastructure in order to continue performing effectively its obligations under the Administration Agreement and to accommodate the effects that such growth will have on our servicing and marketplace needs. PMI must constantly add new hardware and update its software and our personal loan marketplace, expand customer support services, and add new employees to maintain the operations of our personal loan marketplace as well as to satisfy its servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and the Notes and its other obligations under the Administration Agreement. If PMI is unable to increase the capacity of our marketplace and maintain the necessary infrastructure to perform its duties under the Administration Agreement, PFL, or one or more other third-party service providers engaged by PFL, will have to perform the duties otherwise performed by PMI, and investors may experience delays in receipt of payments on their Notes and periodic downtime of our marketplace.
The Credit Card and HELOC products are new products which are complex and require us to allocate significant resources to the development, launch and growth of these new products. If these new products are unable to attract borrowers and generate revenue, our business and results of operations could suffer.
The HELOC product was launched in March 2019 and our Credit Card product was launched in December 2021. The launch of these new and complex products requires us to allocate significant resources in hiring new employees to support each product, ensuring each product complies with new laws and regulations, and integrating the products into our online platform. See Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information about the laws and regulations which affect the Credit Card and HELOC products. There is no guarantee that we will attract the borrowers necessary to generate sufficient revenue to recoup the investment of resources into the development, launch, and growth of these new products. The products may also divert management’s time and effort from other initiatives.
Our Credit Card product is also subject to the risk of fraud or borrower identity theft and we may experience losses on, or inability to recoup losses resulting from, fraudulent Credit Card applications or fraudulent transactions made on Credit
30




Cards. Our Credit Card product is currently focused on higher risk borrowers, who may have higher exposure to economic downturns and general economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of these borrowers. As a result, we may experience significant delinquency rates and fraud and credit losses. Our borrower profile and recent entry into the credit card market could increase these risks and potential losses.
The Credit Card and HELOC products are not available on our personal loan marketplace for investment purposes. The Credit Card and HELOC products did not have a material impact on our revenue as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021.
PFL’s reliance on PMI or other third-party service providers, lack of employees, limited operating history, and capitalization levels could make it difficult to operate at a sustainable level.
PFL was formed in 2012 as a limited purpose vehicle. Under the Administration Agreement, PFL receives a license fee from PMI for granting PMI a non-exclusive, worldwide license to access and use our marketplace. In addition, PFL earns servicing fees in relation to the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes that it retains from collections on the Borrower Loans. PFL believes this fee income is sufficient to cover its reasonably anticipated obligations. While PFL believes that it is adequately capitalized to meet its foreseeable obligations, and that its fee income is sufficient to meet its ongoing operating costs, its financial resources are limited and could prove to be insufficient. In addition, PFL has no employees and relies on PMI, as servicer, or other third-party service providers, to perform most of its day-to-day operations. The lack of PFL’s own employees, its limited operating history, and capitalization that is less than that of PMI could make it difficult for PFL to operate at a level that will be sustainable. Absent the services to be provided to PFL by PMI pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PFL's risk management process, ability to predict loss rates and the general operation of our marketplace would have a smaller margin for error than does PMI.
The market in which we participate is competitive and, if we do not compete effectively, our operating results could be harmed.
The consumer lending market is competitive and rapidly changing. With the introduction of new technologies and the influx of new entrants, we expect competition to persist and intensify in the future, which could harm our ability to increase volume in our marketplace.
Our principal competitors include banking institutions, credit unions, credit card issuers, mortgage lenders, consumer finance companies, and online lending platforms. Competition could result in reduced volumes, reduced fees or the failure of our marketplace to achieve or maintain more widespread market acceptance, any of which could harm our business. In addition, in the future we may experience new competition including companies possessing large, existing customer bases, substantial financial resources and established distribution channels. If any of these companies or any major financial institution decides to enter our online lending sector, acquire one of our existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one of our competitors, our ability to compete effectively could be significantly compromised and our operating results could be harmed.
Most of our current or potential competitors have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their marketplaces and distribution channels. Our potential competitors may also have longer operating histories, more extensive customer bases, greater brand recognition and broader customer relationships than we have. These competitors may be better able to develop new products, to respond quickly to new technologies and to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns. Our industry is driven by constant innovation. If we are unable to compete with such companies and meet the need for innovation, the use of our marketplace could stagnate or substantially decline.
If we fail to promote and maintain our brand in a cost-effective manner, we may lose market share and our revenue may decrease.
To succeed, we must increase transaction volumes in our marketplace by attracting a large number of borrowers and investors in a cost-effective manner. If we are not able to attract qualified borrowers and sufficient investor purchase commitments, we will not be able to increase our transaction volumes. PFL believes that developing and maintaining awareness of its brand in a cost-effective manner is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our marketplace and attracting new borrower and investors. Furthermore, we believe that the importance of brand recognition will increase as competition in our industry increases. Successful promotion of our brand will depend largely on the effectiveness of marketing efforts and the user experience on our marketplace. These brand promotion activities may not yield increased revenues. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand, we may lose our existing users to competitors or be unable to attract new users, which would cause our revenue to decrease and may impair our ability to maintain our marketplace.
The proprietary technology that makes operation of our marketplace possible is not fully protected by patents. It may be difficult and costly for PFL to protect its intellectual property rights in relation thereto, or to continue to develop or obtain new technologies, which could adversely affect its ability to operate competitively.
31




On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred ownership of the marketplace, including the proprietary technology and all of the rights related to the operation of the marketplace, to PFL. PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace depends, in part, upon this proprietary technology. We have taken steps to protect our proprietary interests in such technology, including through patent filings, and intend to continue to vigorously protect these interests. Despite our best efforts, however, we may not protect the proprietary technology effectively, which would allow competitors to duplicate our products and adversely affect our ability to compete. A third party may attempt to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use the proprietary technology without PFL’s consent. In addition, our marketplace may infringe upon claims of third-party patents and PFL or PMI may face intellectual property challenges from such other parties. PFL or PMI may not be successful in defending against any such challenges or in obtaining licenses to avoid or resolve any intellectual property disputes. Furthermore, the technology may become obsolete, and there is no guarantee that PFL will be able to successfully develop, obtain or use new technologies to adapt our marketplace to compete with other companies. If PFL cannot protect the proprietary technology embodied in and used by our marketplace from intellectual property challenges, or if our marketplace becomes obsolete, PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace and perform its servicing obligations could be adversely affected and, in such event, its ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.
PFL relies on a third-party commercial bank to process transactions. If PFL is unable to continue utilizing these services, its business and ability to service the Notes may be adversely affected.
Because PFL is not a bank, it cannot belong to or directly access the Automated Clearing House (ACH) payment network. As a result, it currently relies on an FDIC-insured depository institution to process its transactions. If PFL cannot continue to obtain such services from this institution or elsewhere, or if it cannot transition to another processor quickly, its ability to process payments will suffer and investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes will be delayed or impaired.
If the security of PFL's investors' and borrowers' confidential information stored in our systems is breached or otherwise subjected to unauthorized access, users' secure information may be stolen, our reputations may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liability.
As with any entity with a significant Internet presence, we and the third parties that we use for website hosting and mobile technologies occasionally have experienced cyber-attacks, breaches of our and their systems and other similar incidents, which to-date have not had a material effect on our business, operations or reputation. Future attacks are likely to occur. Our marketplace stores PFL’s investors’ and borrowers’ bank information and other personally identifiable sensitive data. Any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access could cause users’ secure information to be stolen and used for criminal purposes. Security breaches or unauthorized access to secure information could also expose us to liability related to the loss of the information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and negative publicity. If security measures are breached because of third-party action, employee or contractor error, malfeasance, faulty password management or otherwise, or if design flaws in the relevant software are exposed and exploited, and, as a result, a third party or disaffected employee obtains unauthorized access to any investors’ or borrowers’ data, PFL’s relationships with its users could be severely damaged, and PFL (or PMI) could incur significant liability. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we and PMI’s third-party hosting facilities may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. In addition, many states have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving their personal data. These mandatory disclosures regarding a security breach are costly to implement and often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may cause our users to lose confidence in the effectiveness of PFL’s and PMI’s data security measures. Further, California has recently enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, a comprehensive bill that affords individuals in the state affected by data breaches a private right of action against companies that have allegedly been the target of such breaches due to a failure to implement and maintain appropriate cybersecurity policies and procedures. Any security breach, whether actual or perceived, would harm our reputations, and we could lose users.
In addition, we face an increased risk of cyber-attacks during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has forced us and many other companies to institute remote work protocols in order to protect the health and safety of employees. We use industry standard technologies to maintain secure remote work protocols and protect sensitive data within our control, and we require employees to complete security awareness training at regular intervals. However, we are necessarily limited in our ability to control or ensure the security of networks that employees use to work remotely. Further, cybersecurity experts and officials are reporting increased phishing, spoofing and other cyber-attack efforts during COVID-19, as hackers seek to take advantage of the uptick in remote work.
Any significant disruption in service in our marketplace or in PMI’s computer systems could adversely affect PMI’s ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement.
PMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement could be materially and adversely affected by events outside of its control. The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of PMI's technology and its
32




underlying network infrastructure are important to our respective operations, level of customer service, reputation and ability to attract new users and retain existing users. PMI's system hardware is hosted in several hosting facilities located in Las Vegas, Nevada; Scottsdale, Arizona; The Dalles, Oregon; and Council Bluffs, Iowa. Our hosting facilities service providers do not guarantee that access to our marketplace or to PMI's own systems will be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. The operation of our marketplace and PMI's operation of its own systems depends on our service providers' ability to protect the relevant systems in their facilities against damage or interruption from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality, temperature, humidity or other environmental concerns, computer viruses or other attempts to harm them, criminal acts and similar events. As noted above, there is an increased risk of cyber-attacks during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has forced many companies to implement remote work protocols and resulted in greater attempts by malicious actors to carry out cyber-attacks. If PMI's arrangement with any hosting facilities service provider is terminated, or there is a lapse of service or damage to such provider's facilities, PMI could experience interruptions in providing its services under the Administration Agreement, PFL could experience interruptions in the operations of our marketplace, and both could experience delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities. Any interruptions or delays in PMI’s performance of its services or in the functioning of and accessibility of our marketplace, whether as a result of a hosting facility service provider or other third-party error, PMI's error, natural disasters or security breaches, whether accidental or willful, could harm PFL’s relationships with users and its reputation. Additionally, in the event of damage or interruption, PMI's insurance policies may not be sufficient for PMI to adequately compensate PFL for any losses that it may incur. PMI's disaster recovery plan has not been tested under actual disaster conditions, and PMI may not have sufficient capacity to recover all data and services in the event of an outage at one or more hosting facilities. These factors could prevent PMI from processing or posting payments on the Borrower Loans or the Notes, damage PFL's brand and reputation, divert the attention of PMI's employees, reduce PFL's revenue, subject PMI or PFL to liability and cause users to abandon our marketplace, any of which could adversely affect our respective businesses, financial condition and results of operations. 
Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions.
Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions. If a hacker were able to infiltrate our marketplace, users would be subject to the increased risk of fraud or borrower identity theft and may experience losses on, or delays in the recoupment of amounts owed on, a fraudulently induced purchase of a Note. Additionally, if a hacker were able to access our secure files, they might be able to gain access to users’ personal information. While we have taken steps to prevent such activity from affecting our marketplace, if we are unable to prevent such activity, the value of investors’ investment in the Notes could be adversely affected.
Competition for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees we need to perform under the Administration Agreement.
Competition for highly skilled technical and financial personnel is extremely intense. We may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at compensation levels consistent with our existing compensation and salary structure. Many of the companies with which we compete for experienced employees have greater resources than we do and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.
In addition, we invest significant time and expense in training our employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek to recruit them. If we fail to retain our employees, we could incur significant expenses in hiring and training their replacements and the quality of our services and our ability to serve borrower and investors could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect on PMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired. See Item 1, “Business—Human Capital Resources” for more information about Prosper’s employees.
Purchasers of Notes will have no control over us and will not be able to influence our corporate matters.
PFL is not offering and will not offer equity interests in its company. Investors who purchase Notes offered through our marketplace will have no equity interest in either of us and no ability to vote on or influence our decisions. As a result, PMI, which owns all of PFL's outstanding equity interests, will continue to have sole control over PFL's governance matters, subject to the presence of PFL's independent directors, whose consent will be required before PFL can take certain extraordinary actions, and subject to the limitations specified in PFL's organizational documents and the Amended and Indenture.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions that may be difficult to integrate, fail to achieve their strategic objectives, disrupt our business or divert management attention.
PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions of businesses, technologies and products that it intends to complement its existing business, solutions, services and technologies. PMI cannot provide assurance that the acquisitions it has made or will make in the future will provide it with the benefits or achieve the results anticipated in entering into the transaction. Acquisitions are typically accompanied by a number of risks, including: difficulties assimilating and retaining the management and other personnel, culture and operations of the acquired
33




businesses; potential disruption of ongoing business and distraction of management; difficulties in maintaining acceptable standards, controls, procedures and policies, including integrating financial reporting and operating systems, particularly with respect to foreign and/or public subsidiaries; potential loss of existing or acquired strategic operating partners, users and customers following an acquisition; difficulties in integrating acquired technologies and products into our solutions and services; and unexpected costs and expenses resulting from the acquisition, and potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses.
In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt, acquisition-related costs and expenses, restructuring charges and write-offs. Acquisitions may also result in goodwill and other intangible assets that are subject to impairment tests, which could result in future impairment charges.
PMI may enter into negotiations for acquisitions that are not ultimately consummated. Those negotiations could result in diversion of management time and significant out-of-pocket costs. If PMI fails to evaluate and execute acquisitions successfully, PMI may not be able to achieve its anticipated level of growth and its business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Events beyond our control may damage our ability to maintain adequate records, maintain our marketplace or perform the servicing obligations. If such events result in a system failure, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes would be substantially harmed.
If a catastrophic event resulted in a marketplace outage and physical data loss and/or affected our electronic data storage and back-up storage systems, PFL’s ability (and PMI’s ability as servicer under the Administration Agreement) to perform its servicing obligations would be materially and adversely affected. Such events include, but are not limited to, fires, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, natural disasters, computer viruses and telecommunications failures. In the event of any marketplace outage or physical data loss described in this paragraph, PFL cannot guarantee that investors would be able to recoup their investment in the Notes.
Events beyond our control, such as public health emergencies, international conflicts, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events, may damage our ability to continue operations without disruptions, including our ability to attract new borrowers and investors, retain existing investors, as well as the ability of existing borrowers to repay their loans. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Our business is subject to the risk that external events, such as public health emergencies, natural disasters, or other catastrophic events, could disrupt our day-to-day operations and impair the activities of borrowers and investors on our marketplace. Unforeseen events, or the prospect of such events, including acts of war (including the recent invasion of Ukraine by Russia), terrorism and other international conflicts, public health issues including health epidemics or pandemics, such as COVID-19, and natural disasters such as fires, hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados or other adverse weather and climate conditions, whether occurring in the United States or elsewhere, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of our vendors or result in political or economic instability. These events could reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive services from our vendors. Any such disruption could also damage our reputation, which would further lower investor or borrower demand for our products. We could also be subject to claims or litigation with respect to losses caused by such disruptions. Our property and business interruption insurance may not cover a particular event at all or be sufficient to fully cover our losses.
For example, the COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies, including us, to adopt wide-scale remote work protocols in an attempt to protect workforce health and slow community spread of the disease. While we have business continuity procedures in place to guide our response to a crisis, our attention may be diverted away from normal operations and our resources may be constrained. Likewise, borrowers and investors living in areas impacted by COVID-19 or other crises may also experience work slowdowns or stoppages, diminishing their capacity to apply for loans or invest through our marketplace. For existing borrowers, work slowdowns or stoppages may directly result in the inability to make loan payments, and may impair investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the corresponding Notes. Additionally, a potential recession or volatility in capital markets as a result of public health emergencies may cause existing investors to cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our marketplace. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
34




RISKS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE AND REGULATION
Our marketplace must comply with regulatory regimes applicable to consumer credit transactions as well as with regulatory regimes applicable to securities transactions. Certain state laws generally regulate interest rates and other charges and require certain disclosures, and also require licensing for certain activities. In addition, other state laws, public policy and general principles of equity relating to the protection of consumers, unfair and deceptive practices and debt collection practices may apply to the origination, servicing and collection of Borrower Loans in our marketplace. We are also subject to other laws, such as:
the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of their loans;
the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, which amended the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and requires additional procedures, disclosures, fee limits and other protections for consumers applying for or holding open end credit cards;
the Fair Credit Billing Act, which amended the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and creates creditor obligations with respect to billing complaints and errors for credit card customers;
the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act;
the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and Regulation V, which regulates the use, reporting and disclosure of information related to each applicant’s credit history;
the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Regulation F, which regulates debt collection practices by “debt collectors” and prohibits debt collectors from engaging in certain practices in collecting, and attempting to collect, outstanding personal loans;
state counterparts to the above consumer protection laws;
state and federal securities laws, which require that any non-exempt offers and sales of the Notes be registered;
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, and Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in connection with any consumer financial product or service;
the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which includes limitations on financial institutions’ disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties, in certain circumstances requires financial institutions to limit the use and further disclosure of nonpublic personal information by nonaffiliated third parties to whom they disclose such information and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information, and other privacy laws and regulations;
the California Consumer Privacy Act, which provides consumers in the state with extensive rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by certain businesses, and which obligates such businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for addressing consumer requests regarding their personal data;
the Bankruptcy Code, which limits the extent to which creditors may seek to enforce debts against parties who have filed for bankruptcy protection;
the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote their full attention to military duties;
the federal Military Lending Act, which provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions;
the federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which provide disclosure requirements, guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts;
the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures;
the federal Bank Secrecy Act, which relates to compliance with anti-money laundering, customer due diligence and record-keeping policies and procedures;
35




the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and Regulation X, which applies to the HELOC product;
the federal Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C, which applies to the HELOC product; and
state mortgage broker and licensing and registration requirements that meet the minimum standards set forth in the federal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 and Regulation H.
We may not always be in compliance with these laws. Borrowers may make counterclaims regarding the enforceability of their obligations under borrower or consumer protection laws after collection actions have commenced, or otherwise seek damages under these laws. Investors may attempt to rescind their Note purchases under securities laws, and PFL or PMI’s failure to comply with such laws could also result in civil or criminal liability. Compliance with these requirements is also costly, time-consuming and limits operational flexibility. See Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information.
There continues to be uncertainty as to how the actions of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or any other new agency could impact our business or that of our issuing bank.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which commenced operations in July 2011, has broad authority over the businesses in which we engage. This includes authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth in Lending Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices through its regulatory, supervisory, and enforcement authority. To assist in its enforcement, the CFPB maintains an online complaint system that allows consumers to log complaints with respect to various consumer finance products, including the loan products we facilitate. This system could inform future CFPB decisions with respect to its regulatory, enforcement or examination focus.
We are subject to the CFPB's jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority. The CFPB may therefore request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities. In addition, the CFPB may conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis if the CFPB were to determine, based on, for example, consumer complaints, judicial opinions, or administrative decisions, that we are engaging in activities that pose risks to consumers. In addition, the CFPB has announced that it plans to make a rule for the direct supervision of nonbank installment lenders, which may permit the CFPB to conduct periodic examinations of our business.
There continues to be uncertainty as to how the CFPB's strategies and priorities, including in both its examination and enforcement processes, will impact our businesses and our results of operations going forward. Actions by the CFPB could result in requirements to alter or cease offering affected loan products and services, making them less attractive and restricting our ability to offer them.
Although we have committed resources to enhancing our compliance programs, actions by the CFPB or other regulators against us, our issuing banks or our competitors that discourage the use of the marketplace model or suggest to consumers the desirability of other loan products or services could result in reputational harm and a loss of borrowers or investors. Our compliance costs and litigation exposure could increase materially if the CFPB or other regulators enact new regulations, change regulations that were previously adopted, modify, through supervision or enforcement, past regulatory guidance, or interpret existing regulations in a manner different or stricter than have been previously interpreted.
Noncompliance with laws and regulations may impair our ability to facilitate the origination of or service Borrower Loans.
Generally, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements may, among other things, limit our or a third party collection agency's ability to collect all or part of the principal amount of or interest on the Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for payment. In addition, non-compliance could subject us to damages, revocation of required licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions, and civil and criminal liability, which may harm PFL's business and ability to maintain our marketplace and may result in borrowers rescinding their Borrower Loans.
Where applicable, we seek to comply with state lending, servicing and similar statutes, and we continually evaluate our licensing needs. In U.S. jurisdictions with licensing or other requirements that we believe may be applicable to our marketplace, we have obtained necessary licenses or comply with the relevant requirements. Nevertheless, if we are found to not comply with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or face other sanctions, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to continue to facilitate the origination of Borrower Loans through our marketplace, and on our ability to perform servicing obligations or make our marketplace available to borrowers in particular states, which may impair investors' ability to receive the payments of principal and interest on the Notes that they expect to receive.
If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.
36




If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed. The interest rates that are charged to borrowers and that form the basis of payments to investors through our marketplace are based upon the ability under federal law of the issuing bank that originates the loan to export the interest rates of the state where it is located and on our ability to assist the bank in arranging such loans. WebBank, the bank that issues personal loans through our marketplace, exports the interest rates of Utah, which allows parties to generally agree by contract to any interest rate. The interest rates offered by WebBank through our marketplace for Borrower Loans as of December 31, 2021 range from 5.31% to 31.82%, which equate to interest rates for Note investors that range from 4.31% to 30.82%. Some states where borrowers are located, including Utah, have no statutory interest rate limitations on personal loans, while other jurisdictions have a maximum rate less than the current maximum rate offered by WebBank through our marketplace. If a borrower were to successfully bring claims against us for state usury or other state law violations, we could be subject to fines and penalties. Further, if the current structure under which WebBank makes personal loans through our marketplace were successfully challenged, we may have to substantially modify our business operations and may be required to maintain state-specific licenses and only provide a limited range of interest rates for Borrower Loans, all of which may substantially reduce our operating efficiency and attractiveness to investors and possibly result in a decline in our operating results. Recent litigation has successfully challenged lending arrangements in which banks or other exempt entities make loans and sell those loans to a third party charged with servicing the loans.
In addition, it is possible that state usury laws may impose liability that could affect an assignee's (i.e., PFL's and/or an investor who purchases Borrower Loans from PFL) ability to continue to charge to borrowers the interest rates that they agreed to pay at origination of their Borrower Loans.
As discussed in Part I, Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation—State Usury Laws” above, in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC, in May 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC that interpreted the scope of federal preemption under the National Bank Act and held that a nonbank assignee of a loan originated by a national bank was not entitled to the benefits of federal preemption of claims of usury. On November 10, 2015, the defendant in the Madden case filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court for further review of the Second Circuit’s decision. On June 27, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition and refused to review the case, leaving the decision of the Second Circuit intact and binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont. The Madden decision has created some uncertainty as to whether non-bank entities purchasing loans originated by a bank may rely on federal preemption of state usury laws, and may create an increased risk of litigation by plaintiffs challenging our ability to collect interest in accordance with the terms of Borrower Loans. While the decision specifically addressed preemption under the National Bank Act, it could support future challenges to federal preemption for other institutions, including an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank like WebBank. However, although there can be no assurances as to the outcome of any potential litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on our marketplace, we believe the Madden case addressed facts that are not presented by our marketplace lending platform and thus would not apply to Borrower Loans.
In June 2020, the FDIC issued a final regulation entitled “Federal Interest Rate Authority” that, among other things, addressed the uncertainty resulting from the Madden decision, including uncertainty affecting marketplace lenders that partner with banks. Under the FDIC’s rule, which applies to FDIC-insured state-chartered industrial banks such as WebBank, interest on a loan originated by WebBank that was permissible under DIDA at origination is not affected by WebBank’s subsequent sale of the loan to PFL. Seven states and the District of Columbia sued the FDIC, however, seeking to have the regulation set aside on Administrative Procedure Act grounds. Three states brought a similar challenge in the same court to a similar regulation issued by the OCC under the NBA. Both suits were decided in February 8, 2022, with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruling that the FDIC and OCC had not exceeded their statutory authority when promulgating their respective rules.The court deferred to each federal agency's interpretation, and thus concluded that each agency’s rule was not unreasonable or arbitrary or capricious. The states have until April 11, 2022 to appeal the rulings to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. If the states appeal, a decision by the Ninth Circuit overturning the District Court’s rulings could subject Borrower Loans and PFL purchases from WebBank to state usury laws.
In January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claimed that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator’s lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank each intervened in the state court case filed against Marlette and Avant, respectively. On August 18, 2020, the parties reached a settlement that provides a safe harbor for the Marlette and Avant lending platforms, such that if the lending programs meet certain criteria related to oversight, disclosure, funding, licensing, consumer terms, and structure, the programs will be deemed to be in compliance with Colorado’s usury limits. On November 9, 2020, we amended our agreements with WebBank to address the requirements of the safe harbor for extending credit to borrowers in Colorado.
37




We had separately been in discussions with the Colorado Department of Law during the Marlette and Avant litigation regarding certain terms of Borrower Loans offered to Colorado residents. Effective as of July 30, 2019, we and the Administrator entered into a stipulation for the continued operation of the loan program in Colorado, subject to certain financing charge and late fee restrictions during the period that the stipulation is in effect. The stipulation remains in place but may be terminated with 21 days’ notice by either party. No further assurance can be provided as to the timing or outcome of the stipulation.
We and our counsel are monitoring these matters closely and, as developments warrant, we will consider any necessary changes to our marketplace required to avoid the impact of these cases on our business model. Because of investor demand, the maximum annual percentage rates offered through our marketplace may be lower in some states than others.
We rely on agreements with WebBank, pursuant to which WebBank originates personal loans on a uniform basis to qualified borrowers throughout the United States and sells and assigns those loans to PFL. If our relationships with WebBank were to end, we may need to rely on individual state lending licenses or partner with a different bank to offer Borrower Loans.
Borrower Loan requests take the form of an application to WebBank submitted through our marketplace. WebBank currently makes all personal loans to borrowers through our marketplace, which allows our marketplace to be available to borrowers on a uniform basis throughout the United States. If our relationships with WebBank were to end or if WebBank were to cease operations, one or both of PMI and PFL may need to rely on individual state lending licenses or we would need to partner with a different bank to originate Borrower Loans. Because neither of us currently possesses all required licenses to lend in every state, we might be forced to limit the rates of interest charged on Borrower Loans in some states and we might not be able to originate personal loans in some states altogether. If we partner with a new bank, service on our marketplace could be disrupted and delayed as we transition to a different bank partner. We also may face increased costs and compliance burdens if the agreements with WebBank are terminated.
Several lawsuits have sought to recharacterize certain loan marketers and other originators as lenders. If litigation or a regulatory enforcement action on similar theories were successful against one or both of PMI and PFL, Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace could be subject to state consumer protection laws and licensing requirements in a greater number of states.
Several lawsuits in the lending industry primarily involving high-interest “payday loan” marketers have brought under scrutiny the association between those firms and out-of-state banks. These lawsuits assert the loan marketers use out-of-state lenders in order to evade the consumer protection laws imposed by the states where they do business. Such litigation has sought to re-characterize the loan marketer as the lender for purposes of state consumer protection law and usury restrictions. Similar civil actions have been brought in the context of gift cards and retail purchase finance. Although we believe that our activities are generally distinguishable from the activities involved in these cases, a court or regulatory authority could disagree.
Additional state consumer protection laws would be applicable to the Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace if one or both of us were re-characterized as a lender, and the Borrower Loans could be voidable or unenforceable. In addition, we could be subject to claims by borrowers, as well as enforcement actions by regulators. Even if we were not required to cease doing business with residents of certain states or to change our business practices to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could be required to register or obtain licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose a substantial cost on us.
As online commerce develops, federal and state governments may draft and propose new laws to regulate commerce over the Internet, which may negatively affect our businesses.
As online commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation by federal and state governments becomes more likely. Our businesses could be negatively affected by the application of existing laws and regulations or the enactment of new laws applicable to marketplace lending. The cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, and we may be unable to pass along those costs to our users in the form of increased fees. In addition, federal and state governmental or regulatory agencies may decide to impose taxes on services provided online. These taxes could discourage the use of the Internet as a means of consumer lending, which would adversely affect the viability of our marketplace.
If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Company Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.
The Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”) contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment companies” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL and PMI believe each has conducted its business in a manner that does not result in being characterized as an investment company. If, however, PFL is deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, it may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and its activities may be restricted, which would materially adversely affect its business, financial
38




condition and results of operations. Any determination that PMI is an investment company under the Investment Company Act similarly could impair its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and thereby impair PFL’s ability to make payments on the Notes. If PFL or PMI were deemed to be an investment company, PFL or PMI may also attempt to seek exemptive relief from the SEC, which could impose significant costs and delays on their businesses.
If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Advisers Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.
The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the “Investment Advisers Act,” contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment advisers” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL believes that its business consists of providing a platform for marketplace lending for which investment adviser registration and regulation do not apply under applicable federal or state law, and does not believe that it is required to register as an investment adviser with either the SEC or any of the various states. The SEC or a state securities regulator could reach a different conclusion, however. Registration as an investment adviser could adversely affect PFL’s method of operation and revenues. For example, the Investment Advisers Act requires that an investment adviser act in a fiduciary capacity for its clients. Among other things, this fiduciary obligation requires that an investment adviser manage a client’s portfolio in the best interests of the client, have a reasonable basis for its recommendations, fully disclose to its client any material conflicts of interest that may affect its conduct and seek best execution for transactions undertaken on behalf of its client. It could be difficult for PFL to comply with this obligation without meaningful changes to its business operations, and there is no guarantee that it could do so successfully. If PFL were ever deemed to be in non-compliance with applicable investment adviser regulations, it could be subject to various penalties, including administrative or judicial proceedings that might result in censure, fine, civil penalties (including treble damages in the case of insider trading violations), the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or other adverse consequences. Similarly, any determination by regulators that PMI must register as an investment adviser could materially adversely affect PMI and impair its ability to continue to administer our marketplace on PFL’s behalf.
PMI's administration of Quick Invest under its previous offering and PFL’s administration of Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, and Auto Invest under its current offering, could create additional liability for PFL and such liability could be material.
Quick Invest was a loan search tool that allowed investors to identify Notes that met their investment criteria. An investor using Quick Invest was asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings they wished to use as search criteria, (ii) the total amount they wished to invest, and (iii) the amount they wished to invest per Note. Quick Invest then compiled a basket of Notes for their consideration that met their search criteria.
Recurring Investment (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) is an automated loan search tool that allows investors to easily invest in Notes that meet their specific investment criteria by automatically bidding any available funds in their account on Notes that match their selected parameters, in accordance with their specified instructions. An investor using Recurring Investment is asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings and term of the Notes they wish to use as search criteria, and (ii) the amount they wish to invest per Note. If they wish, the investor can further customize their investment criteria by applying one or more of several dozen additional search criteria, such as loan amount, debt-to-income ratio and credit score. The investor can also set aside a specific amount of their funds as a cash reserve that will not be invested by the Recurring Investment tool. After the investor has entered and saved the parameters of their search, Recurring Investment automatically (i) runs searches on the designated criteria as new listings are posted on the marketplace, and (ii) places bids on any Notes identified by each such search. Currently, the Recurring Investment tool is available only through our website, and is not available through our mobile app, Prosper Invest.
Auto Invest is an automated loan search tool that makes it easier for investors to build their desired portfolio of Notes by automatically investing any available funds in an investor’s account in Notes that match the investor’s specified investment criteria and allocation targets. An investor using Auto Invest is asked to select (i) a loan allocation target, or a target mix of loans based on Prosper Ratings, and (ii) the amount they wish to invest per Note. The investor has the option of selecting a target from Prosper’s series of preset loan allocations based on the recent historical loan inventory on the marketplace, any of which may be customized by changing the individual allocation targets for each Prosper Rating, or they can create a custom loan allocation target across Prosper Ratings based on their specific risk tolerance. If they wish, the investor can further customize their investment criteria by applying additional filters, such as loan term and employment status. The investor can also set aside a percentage of their portfolio as a cash reserve that will not be invested by Auto Invest. Investors may update their target allocations, cash reserve and other investment criteria, and pause and restart Auto Invest, at any time. Once the investor turns on Auto Invest, the tool may immediately begin placing orders for Notes in accordance with the investor’s current and target allocations and other criteria. The mix of Notes in any particular order may not match the investor’s individual loan allocation targets, but over time Auto Invest will place orders so that the aggregate holdings in the investor’s portfolio will approximate, to the extent possible, the allocation specified in their investment criteria.
39




Since the Notes purchased through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest and Quick Invest are the same as Notes purchased manually, they present the same risks of non-payment as all Notes that may be purchased through our marketplace. For example, there is a risk that a Borrower Loan identified through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest may become delinquent or default, and that the estimated return or historical return (as applicable) for that loan individually, or the estimated return or historical return (as applicable) for the allocation target or the basket of Notes selected by Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest as a whole, may not accurately reflect the actual return on such loan or Notes. If this were to occur, an investor who purchased a Note from PFL through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest could pursue a claim against PFL in connection with its representations regarding the performance of the Borrower Loans bid upon through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest, respectively. An investor could pursue such a claim under various anti-fraud theories under federal and state securities law.
We may face liability under state and federal securities law for statements in our prospectus and in other communications that could be deemed to be an offer to the extent that such statements are deemed to be false or misleading.
Loan listings and other borrower information available on PFL's website as well as in sales and listing reports are statements made in connection with the purchase and sale of securities that are subject to the antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act and the Securities Act. In general, these liability provisions provide a purchaser of the Notes with a right to bring a claim against one or both of us for damages arising from any untrue statement of material fact or failure to state a material fact necessary to make any statements made not misleading. Even though PFL and PMI have advised investors of what they believe to be the material risks associated with an investment in the Notes and PMI management rights, the SEC or a court could determine that they have not advised investors of all of the material facts regarding an investment in the Notes and PMI Management Rights, which could give investors the right to rescind their investment and obtain damages, and could subject PFL and PMI to civil fines or criminal penalties in addition to any such rescission rights or damages.
PMI and PFL’s activities in connection with the offer and sale of securities through our marketplace could result in potential violations of federal securities law and result in material liability to PFL and/or PMI.
PFL and PMI’s respective businesses are subject to federal and state securities laws that may limit the kinds of activities in which PFL and PMI may engage and the manner in which they engage in such activities. For example, changes to the manner in which PFL offers and sells Notes or other securities through our marketplace could be viewed by the SEC or a state securities regulator as involving the creation or sale of new, unregistered securities. In such circumstances, the failure to register such securities could subject PFL to liability and the amount of such liability could be meaningful. In addition, in 2008, PMI entered into a settlement with the SEC pursuant to which PMI agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations or any future violations of Sections 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act. Failure to comply with that order could result in material civil or criminal liability, which could materially adversely affect PMI’s business and PFL’s offering of Notes.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters, including our principal administrative, marketing, technical support and engineering functions, is located in San Francisco, California, where we lease approximately 50,000 square feet of office space under leases that will expire February 28, 2023. We have also entered into leases for approximately 44,500 square feet of office space located in Arizona and Utah. We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our current needs and that suitable additional alternative spaces will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Our disclosure set forth under Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies—West Virginia Matter, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
Prosper Funding's disclosure set forth under Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies—West Virginia Matter, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
In March 2021, PMI and PFL accepted service of a complaint via email. PMI, PFL and Velocity Investments, LLC, an accounts receivable management company (“Velocity”), were each named in a purported class action lawsuit brought by two individual plaintiffs in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, filed on February 3, 2021 (the “Jones Litigation”). The complaint asserts, on behalf of the plaintiffs and the class members, claims for violation of certain Maryland state laws and seeks damages. The plaintiffs also seek a declaration of requirement for Maryland licensure and that PMI, PFL, and Velocity did not have the right to collect money from the plaintiffs and the class members on the loan accounts. The Jones Litigation was accompanied by a related petition to stay arbitration and demand declaratory judgement in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland (the “Jones Petition”). On April 8, 2021, the Jones Litigation was removed to the United States District
40




Court for the District of Maryland (the “Federal District Court”). In March 2021, a similar class action lawsuit, Khan v. Crown Asset Management LLC, was filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland (the “Khan Litigation”) accompanied by a related petition to stay arbitration (the “Khan Petition”). Prosper was not a named defendant in the Khan Litigation or the Khan Petition. In May 2021, the Khan Litigation was removed to the Federal District Court. On July 15, 2021, plaintiff dismissed the Jones Petition but joined PMI, PFL, and Velocity to the Khan Petition (the “Combined Petition”). The Combined Petition was removed on July 29, 2021 to the Federal District Court. On March 21, 2022, the Federal District Court issued a ruling to compel arbitration in the Jones Litigation and the Khan Litigation, stay the Combined Petition, and combine all cases. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of this matter or estimate the amount of damages, if any, that may be awarded.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information; Holders of Record
There is no established public trading market for PMI's or PFL's common equity. As of December 31, 2021, there were approximately 358 holders of record of PMI’s common stock. As of December 31, 2021, PMI owns 100% of PFL's membership interests.
Dividend Policy
PMI has not paid cash dividends since inception, and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Item 12 in Part III of this Annual Report for information about securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
For the year ended December 31, 2019, PMI issued 173,356 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.15. For the year ended December 31, 2020, PMI issued 687,471 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.02. For the year ended December 31, 2021, PMI issued 3,014,622 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $0.02. These securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder relative to sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not repurchase any common and preferred stock.

ITEM 6. [Reserved]
41




ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with historical financial statements and related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those included in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2021 and 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020. For discussions related to 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019, see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
Overview
Our vision is to transform lives by providing affordable financial solutions through the simplest and most trusted platform. We currently offer access to three lending products, each of which supports our vision: (i) unsecured personal loans through a personal loan marketplace which connects eligible consumer borrowers with individual and institutional investors, (ii) a Credit Card product available to eligible borrowers, and (iii) a HELOC product available to eligible homeowners.
We believe our business model has key advantages relative to traditional banks, including (i) an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects qualified supply and demand of capital, (ii) online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience, and (iii) use of advanced technology and artificial intelligence to deliver simple, fast, personalized, and transparent solutions that can improve consumers’ financial health as they move across the credit spectrum. We do not operate physical branches or incur expenses related to infrastructure like traditional banks or consumer finance institutions. As part of operating our marketplace, we verify the identity of borrowers and assess borrowers’ credit risk profile using a combination of public and proprietary data. Our proprietary technology automates several loan origination and servicing functions, including the borrower application process, data gathering, underwriting, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, our personal loan marketplace facilitated $1.9 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $1.7 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 88% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. During the quarter ended December 31, 2021, our marketplace facilitated $524 million in Borrower Loan originations, of which $464 million were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 89% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. From inception through December 31, 2021 our marketplace has facilitated $20.1 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $18.0 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 89% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period.
As a credit marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate on our marketplace as borrowers or investors and, consequently, could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Recent Developments
We continue to track the impact of COVID-19 and its variants on our communities, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to 4 monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment may continue as long as the pandemic continues to trigger financial hardship for borrowers.
42




Key Operating and Financial Metrics (in thousands)
The following table displays our key operating and financial metrics for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019:
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Loan Originations$1,946,974 $1,486,238 $2,666,085 
Transaction Fees, Net$89,364 $67,335 $119,282 
Whole Loans Outstanding (1)
$2,529,814 $2,816,586 $3,659,601 
Servicing Fees, Net$15,024 $18,517 $23,406 
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $153,570 
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,711)
Core Revenue (2)
$144,626 $103,236 $171,123 
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
$12,814 $(8,587)$3,920 
(1) Balance as of December 31
(2) Core Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP Financial measures. For more information regarding these measures and reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
Loan Originations
Total loan originations on the platform increased 31% for the year ended December 31, 2021 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, which resulted in an increase in Transaction Fees of 33%, or $22.0 million. The loan originations increase for the year ended December 31, 2021 versus the year ended December 31, 2020 was due primarily to increased investor demand, lower rates offered to borrowers and less restrictive underwriting requirements, which is also reflective of the general economic recovery since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
From inception of the Company through December 31, 2021, a total of 1,594,197 Borrower Loans, totaling $20.1 billion, were originated through our marketplace. For the year ended December 31, 2021, 183,041 Borrower Loans totaling $1.9 billion were originated through our marketplace, as compared to 119,711 Borrower Loans totaling $1.5 billion originated in 2020, which represented a unit increase of 53% and a dollar increase of 31%. For the year ended December 31, 2020, 119,711 Borrower Loans totaling $1.5 billion were originated through our marketplace, as compared to 195,656 Borrower Loans totaling $2.7 billion originated in 2019, which represented a unit decrease of 39% and a dollar decrease of 44%.
Loan origination volume by Prosper Rating was as follows for the periods presented (in millions, except percentage):

Year Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Amount%Amount%Amount%
AA$246 13 %$270 18 %$348 13 %
A374 19 %437 29 %639 24 %
B319 16 %311 21 %669 25 %
C246 13 %211 15 %606 22 %
D104 %60 %227 %
E36 %16 %63 %
HR— %— %17 %
Other (1)
621 32 %179 12 %97 %
Total$1,947 100 %$1,486 100 %$2,666 100 %
(1) Represents loans funded through the Prosper platform via the Whole Loan Channel but not assigned Prosper Ratings. These loans are sold only to institutional investors and based on specific underwriting criteria and custom risk models developed by these investors.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the mix of originations on the Prosper platform was generally reflective of less restrictive underwriting standards as compared to the corresponding period in 2020, as the economy continued to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. There has also been a significant increase in the number and dollar amount of loans not assigned Prosper ratings as the Company continues to sell higher risk loans through the Whole Loan Channel to institutional investors that rely on their own custom risk models to underwrite the loans.
43




Whole Loans Outstanding
We sell Borrower Loans through our Whole Loan Channel, and the outstanding balance of these loans serves as a primary driver of our Servicing Assets. Whole loans outstanding decreased $286.8 million or 10% from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021, and $843.0 million or 23% from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020. These decreases are due primarily to the drop in originations from 2019 to 2020 as a result of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by the increase in originations from 2020 to 2021 discussed above. We have also continued to purchase and hold loans in consolidated warehouse trusts, reducing the balance of outstanding whole loans.
Net (Loss) Income
See the section titled “Results of Operations” below, for the discussion on significant changes in Net (Loss) Income year-over-year.
Results of Operations
Overview
The following table summarizes our net (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands, except percentage):
Years Ended December 31,
20212020Change% Change20202019Change% Change
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $41,390 40 %$103,236 $153,570 $(50,334)(33)%
Total Expenses282,896 84,669 198,227 n/m84,669 167,181 (82,512)(49)%
Net (Loss) Income Before Income Taxes(138,270)18,567 (156,837)n/m18,567 (13,611)32,178 n/m
Income Tax Expense(71)(16)(55)n/m(16)(100)84 (84)%
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(156,892)n/m$18,551 $(13,711)$32,262 n/m
n/m: not meaningful
Total Net Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $41.4 million, or 40%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to the Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net, which was a $3.2 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to a $34.2 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2021, a $31.0 million change. The loss in the prior year was largely due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which negatively impacted the fair value of our Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale. Additionally, there was a $22.0 million increase in Transaction Fees, Net, and a $2.4 million increase in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans, both of which were due to the increase in originations during this time. Other Revenues also increased $1.3 million, related primarily to additional credit referral and incentive fee revenue due to increased application volume. These increases were partially offset by a $11.7 million decrease in Total Interest Income (Expense), Net, due primarily to lower outstanding principal balances on securitized Borrower Loans (prior to their deconsolidation from the balance sheet on September 27, 2021), and a $3.5 million decrease in Servicing Fees, Net, as the servicing book of whole loans declined.
Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $198.2 million as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020, which is primarily due to a $138.6 million loss from the Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants, which compared to a $37.7 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2021. The loss in 2021 is driven by an increase in the fair value of the underlying Convertible Preferred Stock. Origination and Servicing, Sales and Marketing and General and Administrative expenses increased a combined $20.7 million from the prior year, as costs increased to support the higher origination volume in 2021. Additionally, various cost reductions were achieved in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including lower compensation and professional services costs. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we also recognized a $1.5 million loss related to the deconsolidation of our securitization variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which is more fully discussed in Note 6 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased $156.9 million million when compared to the net income generated for the year ended December 31, 2020.
44




Revenues
The following table summarizes our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands, except percentage):
Years Ended December 31,
 20212020Change% Change20202019Change% Change
Operating Revenues:   
Transaction Fees, Net$89,364 $67,335 $22,029 33 %$67,335 $119,282 $(51,947)(44)%
Servicing Fees, Net15,024 18,517 (3,493)(19)%18,517 23,406 (4,889)(21)%
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans7,196 4,816 2,380 49 %4,816 10,946 (6,130)(56)%
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans— — — n/a— (17,553)17,553 100 %
Other Revenues3,992 2,711 1,281 47 %2,711 5,953 (3,242)(54)%
Total Operating Revenues115,576 93,379 22,197 24 %93,379 142,034 (48,655)(34)%
Interest Income (Expense):
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale83,107 104,150 (21,043)(20)%104,150 100,786 3,364 %
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments(50,816)(60,127)9,311 (15)%(60,127)(63,736)3,609 (6)%
Total Interest Income (Expense), Net32,291 44,023 (11,732)(27)%44,023 37,050 6,973 19 %
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(3,241)(34,166)30,925 91 %(34,166)(25,514)(8,652)(34)%
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $41,390 40 %$103,236 $153,570 $(50,334)(33)%
Transaction Fees, Net
We earn a transaction fee upon the successful origination of all Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace. We receive payments from WebBank as compensation for the activities we perform on behalf of WebBank. Our fee is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loans that we facilitate on our marketplace and WebBank originates. We record the transaction fee revenue net of any fees paid by us to WebBank.  
Transaction Fees increased by $22.0 million, or 33%, for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to 2020. This increase was consistent with the higher origination volume discussed above.
Servicing Fees, Net
Investors who purchase Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel typically pay us a servicing fee which is generally set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates us for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. We record Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenues when received. The decrease of $3.5 million, or 19%, in Servicing Fees for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to a lower average principal balance of whole loans serviced, which was in turn due primarily to (a) the reduced originations in the prior year as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and (b) an increase in the average principal balance of loans held in consolidated warehouse trusts.
We also increased our base market servicing rate from 0.625% to 0.648% in the third quarter of 2021, which further decreased our Servicing Fees, Net balance for the year ended December 31, 2021. This change was developed with the assistance of a valuation specialist, and was primarily due to observations of increased market servicing compensation rates.
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans consists of net gains on Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan Channel. The $2.4 million or 49%, increase in the gain for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily due to increases in the volume of whole loans sold due to higher originations, as discussed above.
45




Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans relates to warrants to purchase Series F Convertible Preferred Stock issued to the Consortium that vested when the Consortium purchased whole loans under the Consortium Purchase Agreement, which ended in May 2019. Since that date, no further warrants have been issued.
Other Revenues
Other Revenues consist primarily of credit referral and incentive fees. Credit referral fees are earned from partner companies for the referral of customers on our platform, while incentive fees are earned from partner companies through our incentive programs. The $1.3 million or 47% increase in Other Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 2020 was due primarily to increased application volume referred to our credit referral partners, and additional incentive fees earned for this period.
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale and Interest Expense on Financial Instruments
We recognize Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent we believe it to be collectible. We record interest expense on the corresponding Notes, Notes Issued by Securitization Trust, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Warehouse Lines based on the contractual interest rates. The interest rate on Notes is generally 1% lower than the interest rate on the corresponding Borrower Loans to compensate us for servicing the underlying Borrower Loans.
The decrease of $11.7 million or 27% in Total Interest Income (Expense) for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to lower outstanding principal balances on Borrower Loans, Notes Issued by Securitization Trust and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust associated with our consolidated securitization VIEs prior to their deconsolidation from our balance sheet on September 27, 2021. After that date, no interest was accrued on those financial instruments. There have been no new securitizations since 2019. Net interest income from the securitizations decreased approximately $17.3 million as compared to the prior year. This was partially offset by a $4.2 million increase in Net Interest Income from Loans Held for Sale, as we increased the usage of our Warehouse Lines, and the average outstanding principal balance on these loans increased from the prior year. Additionally, there was a $1.4 million increase in Net Interest Income due to a decrease in the amortization of securitization set up costs, due to the timing of when these costs were incurred in 2019.
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net
We record Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust at fair value. Changes in the fair value of Borrower Loans funded through the Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of the Notes due to their borrower payment-dependent structure. Our obligation to pay principal and interest on Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of the servicing fee, which is generally 1.0% of the outstanding balance.
We use Warehouse Lines to finance the purchase of Loans Held for Sale for the purpose of earning Net Interest Income and contributing to securitization transactions. Loans Held for Sale consist primarily of loans held in warehouse trusts. Changes in the fair value of Loans Held for Sale are not offset by changes in fair value of Warehouse Lines because Warehouse Lines are carried at amortized cost. See Note 10 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for more details on Warehouse Lines.
In 2019, we co-sponsored and consolidated three securitization transactions. On September 27, 2021, we sold our interest in residual certificates issued by these three consolidated securitizations and ceased to be the primary beneficiary. As a result, we deconsolidated these entities from our financial statements on that date, including the Borrower Loans and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust that were carried at fair value. All necessary fair value adjustments were recorded up to the date of deconsolidation. Refer to Note 6 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for additional information on the deconsolidation of these entities. Changes in the fair value of Borrower Loans held in consolidated securitization trusts are historically negative due to actual charge-offs but could be negative or positive due to changes in fair value adjustments that are attributable to changes in expected credit performance, prepayment rates and implied market discount rates. We earn interest income on loans held in warehouse and securitization trusts during the period we own or consolidate the loans, which partially offsets changes in the fair value of those loans. The following table illustrates the composition of the loans held in warehouse trusts by Prosper Rating, which is an indicator of the credit quality:
46




Years Ended December 31,
20212020
Loans Held for Sale(1):
AA22 %16 %
A33 %35 %
B28 %34 %
C14 %11 %
D%%
E— %— %
HR— %— %
Grand Total100 %100 %
(1) The percentages are calculated as the weighted average of month-end principal balances of Loans Held for Sale by Prosper Rating.
Fair values of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The key assumptions used include default and prepayment rates derived primarily from historical performance, and discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in other financial instruments with similar characteristics. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net was a loss of $3.2 million and a loss of $34.2 million, respectively.
The decrease in the loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to the prior year was largely due to improvements in the economic landscape since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, which negatively impacted the fair value of the financial instruments due to changes in valuation assumptions, including increased discount and default rates. There has also been an overall decrease in net charge-offs due to government stimulus, COVID-19 payment relief programs and tighter underwriting standards that we implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
For Loans Held for Sale, the gain from changes in fair value was $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, due to a $7.6 million gain on fair value, partially offset by $7.2 million in net charge-offs. This compares to 2020, when the fair value losses were $3.3 million and net charge-offs totaled $8.6 million. The improvement from the prior year is due in part to the $1.4 million decrease in net charge-offs, primarily reflective of decreases in projected future default rates.
For Borrower Loans, the gain from changes in fair value was $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to a $48.6 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2020. This change consisted primarily of a $18.7 million increase in fair value adjustments, driven by more favorable fair value assumptions and the receipt of borrower payments on previously discounted loans, as well as decreased net charge-offs of $30.6 million. Charge-offs increased in 2020 due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, as the portfolio of securitized Borrower Loans continued to season (prior to their deconsolidation from our balance sheet), the outstanding balance of these loans was reduced and the level of charge-offs decreased.
The fair value adjustment gains related to securitized Borrower Loans also contributed to a $6.1 million loss from change in fair value associated with Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust for the year ended December 31, 2021. Specifically, the value of these certificates increased as of September 27, 2021 to reflect the price at which we sold our residual certificate holdings to an unrelated third party. Finally, the gain on changes in fair value from Notes of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 was generally consistent with charge-offs exceeding positive fair value adjustments for loans funded through the Note Channel. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the gain on changes in fair value from Notes was $19.7 million. As charge-offs have decreased from the prior year, the fair value gain on Notes has decreased as well.
47




The following table details the change in fair value of our financial instruments for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Assets:
Borrower Loans$595 $(48,620)$(50,845)
Loans Held for Sale422 (11,883)(6,894)
Liabilities:
Notes1,910 19,664 22,812 
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust(6,110)6,679 7,621 
Total$(3,183)$(34,160)$(27,306)
Expenses
The following table summarizes our expenses for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
20212020$ Change% Change20202019$ Change% Change
Expenses:
Origination and Servicing$35,056 $29,897 $5,159 17 %$29,897 $34,915 $(5,018)(14)%
Sales and Marketing35,065 29,259 5,806 20 %29,259 73,824 (44,565)(60)%
General and Administrative - Research and Development17,172 14,925 2,247 15 %14,925 17,246 (2,321)(13)%
General and Administrative - Other55,950 48,459 7,491 15 %48,459 54,342 (5,883)(11)%
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants138,622 (37,677)176,299 468 %(37,677)(11,235)(26,442)235 %
Impairment Expenses— 445 (445)(100)%445 — 445 100 %
Restructuring Charges, Net— — — n/a— 34 (34)(100)%
Loss on Deconsolidation of VIEs1,494 — 1,494 100 %— — — n/a
Other Income, Net(463)(639)176 (28)%(639)(1,945)1,306 (67)%
Total Expenses$282,896 $84,669 $198,227 234 %$84,669 $167,181 $(82,512)(49)%

The following table reflects full-time employees as of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 by functional area:
 December 31,
 202120202019
Origination and Servicing121 119 145 
Sales and Marketing20 15 17 
General and Administrative - Research and Development101 93 101 
General and Administrative - Other142 126 141 
Total Headcount384 353 404 
Origination and Servicing
Origination and Servicing costs consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our capital markets, collections, customer support and payment processing employees and vendor costs associated with facilitating and servicing loans. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2021 of $5.2 million, or 17%, as compared to 2020 was primarily due to a $2.8 million combined increase in loan servicing and origination costs, consistent with the increase
48




in originations discussed above. Additionally, compensation expense increased $1.2 million, due primarily to elimination of salary reductions we instituted in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and amounts accrued under our long-term incentive plan. Internal-use software amortization also increased $1.3 million during this period due to the deployment of various marketplace features over the past year.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and Marketing costs consist primarily of affiliate marketing, search engine marketing, online and offline campaigns, email marketing, public relations and direct mail marketing, as well as the compensation expenses such as wages, benefits and stock basedstock-based compensation for the employees who support these activities. For the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to2021, the year ended December 31, 2017, the decreaseincrease of 7% was largely due to decreased variable costs. These decreases included a $20.2$5.8 million, or 34% decrease20%, from the prior year was due primarily to a $6.2 million increase in direct mailingmarketing partnership costs, as Prosper decreased the volume of its direct mail campaigns. This was partially offset by a $12.2$1.0 million or 92%, increasedecrease in partnership costs as Prosper significantlydirect mail marketing costs. Additionally, compensation expense increased partnership activities, and a $1.4$0.7 million, or 18%, increasedue primarily to elimination of salary reductions we instituted in online marketing costs.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 compared2020 in response to the year ended December 31, 2016, the increase of 19% was largely due to increased variable costs as Prosper increased its marketing efforts to increase demand from borrowers given the greater availability of funding from investors. These increases included a $17.1 million, or 41%, increase in direct mailing costs
47


as Prosper increased the volume of its direct mail campaigns, a $3.7 million, or 38%, increase in partnership costs as Prosper significantly increased partnership activitiesCOVID-19 pandemic and a $3.9 million, or 107%, increase in online marketing costs. These increases were offset by a $7.8 million or 72% decrease in compensation costs as Prosper significantly reduced its sales and marketing headcount in 2016.amounts accrued under our long-term incentive plan.
General and Administrative – Research and Development
General and Administrative Research and Development costs consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our engineering and product development employees and related vendor costs. The increase of 4% in General and Administrative – Research and Development costs in 2018for the year ended December 31, 2021 of $2.2 million, or 15%, as compared to 20172020 was primarily due largely to ana $1.4 million increase in compensation costsexpense and a $0.1 million increase in outsourced services, primarily related to the development and launch of our Credit Card product and elimination of salary reductions we instituted in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. There was also a $0.3 million as a result of an increase in headcount.
The decreasesoftware licenses and subscription costs, as we continue to invest in 2017 compared to 2016our marketplace technology. Additionally, we incurred $0.2 million in executive search costs. We capitalized internal-use software and web development costs in the amounts of 38% was primarily due to a decrease in compensation costs of $8.0$9.8 million and a decrease of $1.5$8.3 million due to lower contractorfor the years ended December 31, 2021 and consultant usage. Compensation costs decreased as a result of the decrease in headcount in 2016.2020, respectively.
General and Administrative – Other
General and Administrative Other expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our accounting and finance, risk, legal, compliance, human resources and facilities employees, professional fees related to legal and accounting and facilities expenses. The decrease of 7%increase in General and Administrative - Other expensesfor the year ended December 31, 2021 of $7.5 million, or 15%, as compared to 2020 was due primarily the result ofto a decrease$5.4 million increase in compensation expense, driven by increased headcount, elimination of $1.9salary reductions we instituted in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic as well as amounts accrued under our long-term incentive plan. There was also a $1.7 million a decrease in amortization of property and equipment of $1.2 million and a decrease in amortization of intangibles of $1.0 million. Compensation costs decreased primarily because of a decrease in stock based compensation.
The decrease in 2017 compared to 2016 of 23% was primarily the result of a decrease in compensation expense of $11.3 million, a decreaseincrease in professional services, primarily related to contracts and litigation matters. Of the total increases attributable to compensation expense and professional services, approximately $1.4 million related to the launch of $4.4our new Credit Card product. Additionally, depreciation and executive search costs each increased $0.2 million and a decreasefrom the prior year.
Change in rent and occupancy expenses of $3.1 million. The decrease in compensation expenses is the result of the reduction in headcount since the restructuring in May 2016. Rent and occupancy related expenses have decreased as Prosper has ceased the use of, subleased or terminated a number of leases for office space.
Changes in the Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants
ChangesChange in the Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants movedwas a loss of $138.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 due to an increase in the fair value of the underlying Convertible Preferred Stock in 2021.
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants was a gain in 2018 over 2017of $37.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 due to a decrease in the fair value of the underlying convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in 2018. 2020.
Restructuring ChargesImpairment Expense
Restructuring costs consist of personnel and facilities related costsWe recorded no impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2021.
We recorded a $0.4 million impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2020 related to our operating lease right-of-use assets. This impairment was triggered by the strategic restructuring of the business that Prosper announced on May 3, 2016. For 2017 and 2018, the expenses relate to adjustments to fair value of the existing liabilities and accretion expense on the remaining liability. The 2016 restructuring included the terminationnon-renewal of certain employees in our Phoenix, Arizona and San Francisco, California locations and the closingsublease agreements for a portion of our Salt Lake City, Utah location. Personnel costs include employee severance and benefits for the terminationoffice space.
Loss on Deconsolidation of 167 employees. Facilities charges include estimated losses on the sublease and lease termination costs for propertiesVIEs
As discussed in Phoenix, Salt Lake City and San Francisco. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2016, Prosper incurred additional restructuring expenses when it closed its office in Tel Aviv, Israel and ceased the use of leased office space in Delaware. The closure of the Tel Aviv office included the termination of 31 employees.
Other Expenses, Net
Other Expenses, Net consist of interest income, proposed SEC settlement costs, contract termination costs and impairment charges on assets held for sale. In 2018, this largely consisted of the $3.0 million of expense for the proposed settlement with the SEC related to the annualized net return matter, which costs were offset by interest income on available for sale securities.  For more information on the proposed SEC settlement costs, please refer to Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies6 of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements. In 2017, management recordedstatements, we sold our holdings of residual certificates issued by three consolidated securitization trust VIEs to an impairment chargeunrelated third party on September 27, 2021. As a result of $6.4that sale, we determined that we were no longer the primary beneficiary of those VIEs and they were deconsolidated on that date. We recognized a loss on deconsolidation totaling $1.5 million, related towhich consists of the intangible$4.1 million in cash consideration received for the sale of the residual certificates, less net assets associated with the Prosper Daily application and Prosperdeconsolidated of $5.6 million.
4849



settled certain rebates related
Other Income, Net
Other Income, Net was $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and primarily consists of interest income on Cash, Cash Equivalents, as well as sublease income. The decrease of $0.2 million in Other Income, Net for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to 2020 was primarily due to a decrease in interest income of $0.2 million, as interest rates declined throughout 2020 and into the purchasebeginning of whole loans2021, and a decrease in sublease income of $0.1 million. These decreases were partially offset by membersa $0.1 million gain recognized as part of the Consortium prior to the closingdissolution of the Consortium transaction via the issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants at a loss of $1.5 million over the cash settlement amount. In 2016, Prosper negotiated the termination of a contract with Colchis Capital Management, L.P. ("Colchis"). In exchange for termination of the contract Prosper agreed to pay Colchis $9 million and issue a warrant to purchase shares of a new series of preferred stock representing 7% of Prosper's capitalization as of the date of issuance for $0.01 per share. The fair value of the warrants at the time of contract termination was $21.7 million.our BillGuard Ltd. entity in January 2021.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Core Revenue
Core Revenue is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as our Total Net Revenue adjusted to exclude the Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans. We believe it is useful to exclude the Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans from Total Net Revenue to derive a better measurement of our business performance. We believe that this adjustment also affords greater comparability to other marketplace lenders.companies.
The underlying Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans relates to the Consortium Purchase Agreement. This agreement expiresexpired in May 2019 and Prosperwe currently doesdo not expect to sign a similar agreement to replace it. As a result, we believe that providing the Core Revenue metric that excludes the impact of our Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans is useful to investors.
Core Revenue has limitations as a financial measure, should be considered as supplemental in nature, and is not meant as a substitute for Total Net Revenue which has been prepared in accordance with USU.S. GAAP. These limitations include the following:

Core Revenue is net ofexcludes Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans, which is our largest contra revenue item;item (no amount has been recorded since May 2019, when the Consortium Purchase Agreement ended); and
otherOther companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Core Revenue differently or not at all, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Because of these limitations, you should consider Core Revenue alongside other financial performance measures, including Total Net Revenue and our financial results presented in accordance with USU.S. GAAP. The following table presents a reconciliation of Total Net Revenue to Core Revenue for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Total Net Revenue$104,361 $116,235 $136,005 
Less: Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(72,316)(60,122)— 
Core Revenue$176,677 $176,357 $136,005 
 Year Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Total Net Revenues$144,626 $103,236 $153,570 
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans— — (17,553)
Core Revenue$144,626 $103,236 $171,123 
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as Net LossIncome (Loss) adjusted for interest income on availableAvailable for sale securitiesSale Investments and cashCash and cash equivalents, proposedCash Equivalents, SEC settlement costs, income tax expense,Settlement Costs, Income Tax Expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment of intangiblelong-lived assets and goodwill, stock based compensation expense, fair valueFair Value of warrants vestedWarrants Vested on the saleSale of borrower loans, restructuring charges,Borrower Loans, Restructuring Charges, and fair value adjustments for warrant liabilities.Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants and certain infrequent or unusual transactions. The presentation of non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP.
We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be a helpful indicator of the operational strength and performance of our business and a good measure of our historical operating trends. Management uses Adjusted EBITDA to, among other things, understand and compare operating results across accounting periods, evaluate our operations and financial performance and for internal planning and forecasting purposes. Inclusion of Adjusted EBITDA is intended to provide investors insight into the manner in
49


which management views the performance of the Company, enhance investors’ evaluation of our operating results, and to facilitate meaningful comparisons of our results between periods. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, the GAAP financial information provided herein.
50




Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under USU.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
althoughAlthough depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements;
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
Adjusted EBITDA does not consider the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based charges;
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us; and
otherOther companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.
The major non-GAAP adjustments, and our basis for excluding them, are outlined below:
Fair value of warrants vested on the sale of borrower loansBorrower Loans and changechanges in the fair value of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock warrants liability.liability - We exclude these charges primarily because they are non-cash charges and the fair value varies based on the fair value of the underlying preferred stock, varying valuation methodologies and subjective assumptions. ThisTheir inclusion makes the comparison of our current financial results to previous and future periods difficult to evaluate.
Stock-based compensation expense.Impairment of Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets - We have recognized impairment on our operating lease right-of-use assets related to vacant sublease space and the expected timing of finding new subtenants. We exclude these charges because they are non-cash and because management does not believe they are reflective of our ongoing operating results.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense - This consists of expenses for equity awards under our equity incentive plans. Although stock-based compensation is an important aspect of the compensation paid to our employees, the grant date fair value varies based on the stock price at the time of grant, varying valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types. This makes the comparison of our current financial results to previous and future periods difficult to evaluate;evaluate; therefore, we believe it is useful to exclude stock-based compensation. We also excluded these expenses because they are non-cash.
Amortization or impairment of acquired intangible assetsIntangible Assets and impairment of goodwill.Goodwill - We incur amortization or impairment of acquired intangible assetsIntangible Assets and goodwillimpairment of Goodwill in connection with acquisitions and therefore exclude these amounts from our non-GAAP measures. We exclude these items because management does not believe they are reflective of our ongoing operating results.
Restructuring charges.Charges - We have incurred restructuring chargesRestructuring Charges that are included in our GAAP financial statements, related to workforce reductions and estimated costs of exitingexisting facility lease commitments due to our May 2016 restructuring. We exclude these items from our non-GAAP financial measures when evaluating our continuing business performance as such itemsthese costs do not reflect expected future operating expenses. In addition, these chargescosts do not necessarily provide meaningful insight into the fundamentals of current or historical operations of our business.
Contract termination chargesLoss on deconsolidation of VIEs.: We have incurred contract termination charges that are includeda non-cash loss on the deconsolidation of three securitization trust VIEs in our GAAP financial statements, related to a material contract termination.September 2021, consisting of the net consideration received and net assets deconsolidated. We exclude the impact of this item from our non-GAAP financial measures when evaluating our continuing business performance as such items doloss because of the infrequent nature of the transaction. Management does not reflect expected future operating expenses. In addition, these charges do not necessarily provide meaningful insight into the fundamentals of current or historical operationsbelieve that it is reflective of our business.ongoing operating results.
5051




SEC settlement costs. Our GAAP financial statements include settlement costs incurred for a proposed settlement with the SEC related to the annualized net return matter. We exclude this item from our non-GAAP financial measures when evaluating our continuing business performance as such items do not reflect expected future operating expenses. In addition, these charges do not necessarily provide meaningful insight into the fundamentals of current or historical operations of our business.
The following table presents a reconciliation of Net Loss(Loss) Income to Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 31,
 201820172016
Net Loss$(39,945)$(115,158)$(118,741)
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans72,316 60,122 — 
Depreciation expense:
Servicing and Origination5,664 5,853 4,083 
General & Administration - Other3,926 5,110 5,298 
Amortization of Intangibles378 1,385 3,838 
Impairment of Intangibles— 6,399 — 
Stock-based Compensation8,401 12,238 19,787 
Restructuring Charges1,762 1,340 17,027 
Change in the Fair Value of Warrants(45,003)29,140 
Interest Income on Available for Sale Securities, Cash and Cash Equivalents(1,223)(461)(547)
Contract Termination— — 30,711 
SEC Settlement Costs3,000 — — 
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)172 (508)546 
Adjusted EBITDA$9,448 $5,460 $(37,991)
Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,711)
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans— — 17,553 
Depreciation expense:
    Servicing and Origination7,167 5,830 5,111 
    General and Administrative - Other2,501 2,300 2,286 
Amortization of Intangibles172 219 279 
Impairment Expenses— 445 — 
Stock-Based Compensation1,136 1,913 4,528 
Restructuring Charges, Net— — 34 
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants138,622 (37,677)(11,235)
Interest Income on Available for Sale Securities, Cash and Cash Equivalents(8)(184)(1,025)
Loss on Deconsolidation of VIEs1,494 — — 
Income Tax Expense71 16 100 
Adjusted EBITDA$12,814 $(8,587)$3,920 

Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations include the following amountamounts of stock basedstock-based compensation expense for the periods presented (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Origination and servicing$911 $996 $2,004 
Sales and marketing451 553 2,914 
General and administrative7,039 10,689 14,824 
Restructuring— — 45 
Total stock based compensation$8,401 $12,238 $19,787 
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Servicing and Origination$123 $35 $417 
Sales and Marketing62 69 243 
General and Administrative951 1,809 3,868 
     Total Stock-Based Compensation Expense$1,136 $1,913 $4,528 
51


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forthWe anticipate our unaudited consolidated statement of operations data for each of the eight quarters ended December 31, 2018. The unaudited quarterly statement of operations data set forth below have been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are necessary for a fair statement of the unaudited quarterly statement of operations data. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future operating results. The following quarterly consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information):
Quarters EndedDecember 31,
2018
September 30, 2018June 30, 2018March 31, 2018
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net$25,806 $28,225 $37,988 $31,354 
Servicing Fees, Net7,017 7,339 7,487 7,184 
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans2,496 3,139 4,163 3,350 
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(16,844)(19,561)(20,633)(15,279)
Other Revenues878 1,453 1,015 1,352 
Total Operating Revenues19,353 20,595 30,020 27,961 
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans15,711 15,088 14,556 12,360 
Interest Expense on Notes and Warehouse Line(11,914)(11,772)(11,471)(10,729)
Net Interest Income3,797 3,316 3,085 1,631 
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(1,595)(3,229)(1,430)858 
Total Net Revenues21,555 20,682 31,675 30,450 
Expenses
Origination and Servicing8,790 8,313 9,192 8,821 
Sales and Marketing14,849 23,415 20,907 18,828 
General and Administrative17,439 18,066 18,151 18,715 
Restructuring Charges, Net950 218 271 323 
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(27,119)(9,283)(3,998)(4,604)
Other Expenses, Net2,668 (276)(258)(242)
Total Expenses17,577 40,453 44,265 41,841 
Net Loss Before Taxes3,978 (19,771)(12,590)(11,391)
Income Tax Expense145 10 
Net Income (Loss)$3,833 $(19,779)$(12,599)$(11,401)
Less: Net Income Allocated to Participating Securities(3,234)— — — 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders$599 $(19,779)$(12,599)$(11,401)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Basic$0.01 $(0.28)$(0.18)$(0.16)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Diluted$0.01 $(0.28)$(0.18)$(0.16)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic70,384,501 70,394,269 70,362,716 70,302,910 
Weighted-Average Shares - Diluted110,584,811 70,394,269 70,362,716 70,302,910 

52


Quarters EndedDecember 31, 2017September 30, 2017June 30, 2017March 31, 2017
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net$30,632 $37,250 $35,423 $26,869 
Servicing Fees, Net7,284 6,976 6,793 6,154 
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans3,574 4,373 3,803 (318)
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(18,157)(21,772)(16,887)(3,307)
Other Revenues1280 1390 1415 720 
Total Operating Revenues24,613 28,217 30,547 30,118 
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans11,636 12,065 12,007 11,499 
Interest Expense on Notes and Warehouse Line(10,851)(11,247)(11,177)(10,678)
Net Interest Income785 818 830 821 
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(317)(173)70 (94)
Total Net Revenues25,081 28,862 31,447 30,845 
Expenses
Origination and Servicing8,341 9,263 8,873 8,404 
Sales and Marketing21,829 21,947 20,131 19,555 
General and Administrative18,088 18,123 18,758 20,717 
Restructuring Charges, Net682 86 647 (75)
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants— 6,323 22,416 401 
Other Expenses, Net(213)(25)1,930 5,700 
Total Expenses48,727 55,717 72,755 54,702 
Net Loss Before Taxes(23,646)(26,855)(41,308)(23,857)
Income Tax Expense(854)85 97 164 
Net Loss Applicable to Common Shareholders$(22,792)$(26,940)$(41,405)$(24,021)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted$(0.33)$(0.39)$(0.59)$(0.35)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted70,058,880 69,811,534 69,691,841 69,178,049 

Liquidity and Capital Resources (in thousands):
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 201820172016
Net Loss$(39,945)$(115,158)$(118,741)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities(176,482)(10,789)(57,208)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities23,611 (27,454)(14,317)
Net cash provided by financing activities161,467 50,462 40,251 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash8,596 12,219 (31,274)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the period198,463 186,244 217,518 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the period$207,059 $198,463 $186,244 
Net cash increasedliquidity needs for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to $31.5next twelve months, and for the foreseeable future beyond that period, can be met through transaction fees, servicing fees, net interest income, proceeds from sales of loans, draws on Warehouse Lines, proceeds from our $8.4 million of net maturities of available for sale securities, $161.8 millionloan provided by the Warehouse LinePaycheck Protection Program (the “PPP loan”), and $11.3 millionCash and Cash Equivalents. For further details related to our warehouse lines and PPP loan, see Note 10 of net income, net of non-cash items. This was partially offset by the net $4.9 million lessaccompanying consolidated financial statements. The table in the section titled “Contractual Obligations” below summarizes our current and long-term material cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as restricted cash, $186.9 million of net purchases of borrower loans by Prosper, and $5.9 million in purchases of property and equipment. Net cash used in investing primarily represents acquisitions of Borrower Loans (excluding acquisition of Borrower Loans sold to unrelated
53


third parties, which is included in cash flow from operations along with the corresponding proceeds from sale of Borrower Loans), offset by repayment of Borrower Loans and $31.5 million of available for sale securities that have been converted into cash. Net cash provided by financing activities primarily represents proceeds from the Warehouse Line and the issuance of Notes, partially offset by payments on the Warehouse Line and Notes.
Net cash increased for the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the $50.0 million ($47.9 million net of fees) raised through the sale of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock and $7.1 million of net income, net of non-cash items.  This was offset by net purchases of available for sale securities of $20.4 million, net $10.2 million less cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as restricted cash and $4.2 million in purchases of property and equipment.  
Net cash decreased for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the $54.4 million loss, net of non-cash items, $10.0 million for purchase of Property and Equipment, a $5.0 million payment for the BillGuard contingent liability and a $3 million scheduled payment to reduce our settlement liability in connection with the 2013 Settlement. These decreases are offset by net proceeds from available for sale securities being converted to cash of $40.3 million and $6.1 million of additional cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as restricted cash.  
Prosper also has available for sale securities that are available for its liquidity needs. The fair value of securities available for salerequirements as of December 31, 2018 was $22.2 million. As a result the total cash, cash equivalents2021. Management monitors our financial results and available for sale investments available to Prosper at December 31, 2018 for its liquidity needs was $80.1 million. At December 31, 2018, the available for sale securities included Treasury Bills and US Treasury securities. All securities were rated investment grade (defined as a rating equivalent to a Moody’s rating of “Baa3” or higher, or a Standard & Poor’s rating of “BBB-” or higher) and there were no significant unrealized losses. These securities continue to be available to meet liquidity needs.
We believe our cash and equivalents, together with available for sale investments and cash flows from operations, will be sufficient to meet our operating and liquidity requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, ifoperations. If the financial results anticipated are not achieved, our current cash and equivalents and available for sale investmentssources of liquidity may not be sufficient to meet our operating and liquidity requirements for at least the next twelve months without obtaining additional sources of liquidity which may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our future operating and liquidity requirements will depend on numerous factors, including without limitation, future results of operations, and

52




The following table summarizes our continued ability to attract borrowers and investors to our platform. If we are unable to generate positive cash flow activities for the periods presented (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,711)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$113,563 $(32,334)$(68,078)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(7,178)137,655 96,480 
Net cash used in financing activities(84,628)(111,861)(15,053)
Net increase (decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash21,757 (6,540)13,349 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the beginning of the period213,868 220,408 207,059 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the end of the period$235,625 $213,868 $220,408 

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash increased by $21.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, based on the following components:
Operating Activities: $113.6 million in cash was provided by operating activities, driven by (a) $58.1 million in net proceeds from operations orLoans Held for Sale, (b) $33.2 million in cash provided by working capital and (c) $22.3 million in net loss, net of non-cash items. These non-cash items include the $1.5 million Loss on Deconsolidation of VIEs, which is more fully described in Note 6 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Investing Activities:$7.2 million in cash was used in investing activities due to obtain funds(a) $232.0 million in purchases of Borrower Loans and (b) $12.0 million purchases of property and equipment, primarily consisting of internal-use software, offset by (c) $236.9 million in principal payments on Borrower Loans.
Financing Activities:$84.6 million in cash was used in financing activities, due primarily to (a) $102.6 million in payments on Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trusts, (b) $33.1 million in net payments on Warehouse Lines and (c) $6.8 million in net cash and restricted cash outflows from additional sources, this could have a material adverse effectthe deconsolidation of the securitization VIEs. The $6.8 million consists of $4.1 million in cash proceeds from the sale of residual certificates, offset by $10.9 million in restricted cash retained by the deconsolidated VIEs. These are offset by $59.7 million in proceeds, net of payments, from Notes, at Fair Value. We also incurred $1.7 million in debt issuance costs related to the extension of the PWIIT Warehouse Line in March 2021 and the PWIT Warehouse Line in May 2021 (Note 10).
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash decreased by $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, based on our businessthe following components:
Operating Activities: $32.3 million in cash was used in operating activities, driven by (a) $83.6 million in purchases, net of proceeds from sales and financial condition.principal payments, of Loans Held for Sale offset by (b) $17.0 million in cash provided by working capital, primarily due to the timing of payments to investors and third-party vendors, and (c) $34.3 million in net income, net of non-cash items.
Investing Activities: $137.7 million in cash was provided by investing activities primarily due to (a) $279.7 million from sales and principal payments of Borrower Loans, offset by (b) $133.6 million in purchases of Borrower Loans and (c) $8.4 million in purchases of property and equipment, primarily consisting of internal-use software.
Financing Activities: $111.9 million in cash was used in financing activities primarily due to (a) $16.2 million in payments, net of proceeds from issuance, on Notes, at Fair Value and (b) $214.9 million in payments on Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trusts, offset by (c) $110.8 million in net proceeds from Warehouse Lines and (d) $8.4 million in proceeds from the PPP loan.
Income Taxes
We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by applying the statutory tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences between the financial reporting and tax filing bases of existing assets and liabilities are expected to reverse. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax
53




assets. Based on the weight of available evidence, which includes our historical operating performance and the reported cumulative net losses in prior years, we have provided a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets.
We reportrecorded a liabilityreserve for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. We are required to make subjective assumptions and judgments regarding our income tax exposures. Interpretations and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time. As such, changes in our subjective assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As a result of retaining servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, we are a variablean interest holder in certain special purpose entities that purchase these Borrower Loans. None of these special purpose entities are consolidated as we are not the primary beneficiary. Other than these special purpose entities, as of December 31. 2018,31, 2021, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities that were established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other purposes.
54


Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the following table summarizes our contractual obligations and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands):
Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
TotalLess Than 1 Year1 - 3 Years3 - 5 YearsMore Than 5 YearsTotalLess Than 1 Year1 - 3 Years3 - 5 YearsMore Than 5 Years
Operating lease obligations, net of minimum sublease rentals$19,228 $4,536 $9,139 $5,166 $387 
Operating lease obligationsOperating lease obligations$11,930 $5,833 $3,484 $2,613 $— 
Financing lease obligationsFinancing lease obligations78 78 — — — 
WebBank purchase obligationsWebBank purchase obligations25,864 — WebBank purchase obligations13,767 13,767 — — — 
WebBank minimum origination feesWebBank minimum origination fees3,744 1,244 2,500 — 
Total contractual obligationsTotal contractual obligations$45,092 $30,400 $9,139 $5,166 $387 Total contractual obligations$29,519 $20,922 $5,984 $2,613 $— 
WebBank Purchase Obligations
Under our loan account program with WebBank, a Utah-charted industrial bank that serves as our primary issuing bank, WebBank retains ownership of loans facilitated through our marketplace for two business days after origination. As part of this arrangement, we have committed to purchase the loans at the conclusion of the two business days.
Critical Accounting PoliciesWebBank Minimum Origination Fees
We are required to pay WebBank a minimum fee to the extent monthly loan originations due to not meet certain contractual thresholds. This obligation is more fully discussed in Note 17 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies discussed below reflect our most significant judgments, assumptions and estimates which we believe are critical in understanding and evaluating our reported financial results including: (i) fair value measurement of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Notes;Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust (prior to their deconsolidation in September 2021); (ii) stock-based compensation expense;Loan Servicing Assets and (iii) loan servicing assets and liabilities; (iv) consolidationfair value measurement of variable interest entities;  (v) impairment of goodwill and intangible assets and (vi) convertible preferred stock warrant liability.Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. These judgments, estimates and assumptions are inherently subjective in nature and actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, and the differences could be material. For a full description of all accounting policies adopted by us, please see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
Valuation of Borrower Loans, and Notes
Through the Note Channel, we issueLoans Held for Sale, Notes and purchase Borrower Loans from WebBank, and hold the Borrower Loans until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notes issued through the Note Channel is conditioned upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loan. Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust
We have elected fair value accounting for Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and the related Notes. The fair value election for these Borrower Loans and Notes allows for the use of the same measurement approach for both Borrower Loans and the related Notes, consistent with the borrower payment dependent design of such Notes. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful for the readers of the financial statements and it allows both the Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and the related Notes to be valued using the same methodology. A specific allowance account is not recorded relating to the Borrower Loans in which we have elected the fair value option but rather wefor Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. We primarily use a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. The key assumptions used in the valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics. All these assumptions require
54




significant management judgment. For further information on fair value measurement of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, usingand Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, refer to Note 7 - Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements.
Valuation of Loan Servicing Asset
We have elected to adopt the fair value method to measure the Servicing Assets for all classes of Servicing Assets subsequent to initial recognition. We use a discounted cash flow methodologies adjusted for the expected payment, loss and recovery rates. The valuation methodology considers projected prepayments and uses the historical defaults, losses and recoveries on Borrower Loansmodel to project future losses and net cash flows on such Borrower Loans.
We include in earnings the estimated unrealized fair value gains or losses during the period of Borrower Loans, and the offsetting estimated fair value gains or losses on the related Notes in the period in which such changes in fair value occurs.  
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans on the Consolidated Statement of Operations includesestimate the fair value of Series Fthe loan Servicing Assets which incorporates significant unobservable inputs of the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that we earn on the Borrower Loans, the estimated market Servicing Fees to service such loans, the prepayment rates, the default rates, discount rate and the current principal balances of the loans. For further information on fair value measurement of the Servicing Assets, refer to Note 5 - Servicing Assets and Note 7 - Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements.
Valuation of Convertible Preferred Stock warrants that have vested during the period. These warrantsWarrants
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants primarily consist of warrants to purchase Series E and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock issued to the Consortium that vestvested when the Consortium purchasespurchased whole loans under the Consortium Purchase Agreement, that was signedwhich ended in February 2017. On vesting of the Series F warrants, Prosper records a liability as "Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value
55


and a corresponding amount as "Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans" on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as contra-revenue.May 2019.
We estimate the fair value of the Series E and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrantsWarrants using valuation methods appropriate for the circumstances at the time of vesting.each balance sheet date. Generally, this includes determining the business enterprise value of the Company using methods that may include discounted cash flow model, comparable public company analysis, and comparable acquisition analysis, which require significant management judgment. Additionally, we review and consider any recent transactions involving the Company's equity in determining whether such transactions should be considered in the Company's stock and market indicators.valuation. Once the business enterprise value has been estimated, an option pricing model is used to allocate the value to the various classes of Prosper'sour equity. The concluded per share value for the Series E and Series F convertible preferred stock warrantConvertible Preferred Stock Warrant is then determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation includes expense associated with stock option grantsmodel that requires us to make key assumptions such as volatility and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Stock-based compensation for stock options is measured at the grant date basedexpected warrant term. For further information on the fair value measurement of the awardConvertible Preferred Stock Warrants, refer to Note 7 - Fair Value of Assets and is recognized as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting periodLiabilities and Note 12 - Convertible Preferred Stock, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability and Common Stock of the respective award. As a result, we estimate the amount of stock-based compensation we expectaccompanying notes to be forfeited based on our historical experience. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from our estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted.
Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the grant date fair value of options using an option-pricing model is affected by our assumptions regarding a number of variables including the fair value of our common stock, our expected common stock price volatility over the expected life of the options, expected term of the stock option, risk-free interest rates and expected dividends.
Loan Servicing Asset and Liability
We record loan servicing assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values when we sell Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in “Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans” on the consolidated statement of operations while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing fee is recorded in servicing assets or liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in “Servicing Assets” and “Other Liabilities,” respectively, on the consolidated balance sheet.
We have elected to adopt the fair value method to measure the servicing assets and liabilities for all classes of servicing assets and liabilities subsequent to initial recognition.
We use a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan servicing assets or liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that we earn on the Borrower Loans, estimated market servicing fees to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and the current principal balances of the loans.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
The determination of whether to consolidate a variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which we have a variable interest requires a significant amount of analysis and judgment whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE via a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest in a VIE exists if we have both the power to direct the VIE’s activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and a potentially significant economic interest in the VIE. The determination of whether an entity is a VIE considers factors, such as (i) whether the entity’s equity investment at risk is insufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) when a holder’s equity investment at risk lacks any of the following characteristics of a controlling financial interest: the direct or indirect ability through voting rights or similar rights to make decisions about a legal entity’s activities that have a significant effect on the entity’s success, the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the legal entity. 
As a result of the nature of the retained servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, we are a variable interest holder in certain special purposes entities that purchase these Borrower Loans.  For all of these entities we either do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance or we do not have a potentially significant
56


economic interest in the VIE.   In no case are we the primary beneficiary and as a result none of these entities are consolidated on our consolidated financial statements.  
Management regularly reviews and reconsiders its previous conclusions regarding the status of an entity as a VIE and whether we are required to consolidate such VIE in thePMI’s consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually in the third quarter, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. Triggering events that may indicate impairment include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in customer demand or business climate that could affect the value of goodwill or a significant decrease in expected cash flows. During the periods presented no reporting units were at risk of failing step one of the impairment analysis.
Intangible assets consist of identifiable intangible assets, primarily developed technology and customer lists, resulting from our acquisitions. Acquired intangible assets are recorded at cost, net of accumulated amortization. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line or accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives. Long-lived assets, including intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.


57


PROSPER FUNDING LLC
This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Prosper Funding’s historical financial statements and related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and Prosper Funding’s actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those included in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Overview
Prosper Funding was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with PMI as its sole equity member. Prosper Funding was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and issue related Notes. Although Prosper Funding is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper Funding has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. Prosper Funding’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. Prosper Funding seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and by implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct corporate entity from PMI.
As a credit marketplace, we believe our customers are more highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate in our marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Recent Developments
We continue to track the impact of COVID-19 and its variants on our communities, and are offering assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to four monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31,
55




2021. Overall requests for COVID-19 relief are declining; however, enrollment may continue as long as the pandemic continues to trigger financial hardship for borrowers.
Results of Operations
Overview
The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s net income for the years ended December 31, 2018,2021, December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 20162019 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
20212020Change% Change20202019Change% Change
Total Net Revenues$62,757 $52,153 $10,604 20 %$52,153 $73,562 $(21,409)(29)%
Total Expenses59,547 50,752 8,795 17 %50,752 67,620 (16,868)(25)%
Net Income$3,210 $1,401 $1,809 129 %$1,401 $5,942 $(4,541)(76)%
Year Ended
December 31,
Year Ended
December 31,
 20182017% Change20172016% Change
Total Net Revenue$78,107 $81,682 (4)%81,682 72,439 13 %
Total Expenses77,228 76,841 %76,841 99,623 (23)%
Net Income (Loss)$879 $4,841 (82)%$4,841 (27,184)118 %

Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $3.62021 increased $10.6 million, a 4% decreaseor 20%, from the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, primarily due to increased administration fee revenue driven by an increase in the decreased number of loan listings on the marketplace during 2018, which resultedthe period. Additionally, increased originations have led to additional servicing assets and thus a larger Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans. These increases were partially offset by decreased Servicing Fees, Net, due to a lower outstanding Borrower Loan balance in decreased administration fee revenue for the listing driven portion of the administration fee.servicing portfolio. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 20182021 increased $0.4$8.8 million, a 1% increaseor 17%, from the year ended December 31, 2017,2020 primarily due to an increase in administration fee expenses. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $4.0 million, an 82% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the decreased revenue described above.
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $9.2 million, a 13% increase from the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the increased number of loan listings onloans funded during the marketplace during 2017,period, which resulted in increased administration fee revenue forexpense. The increases in loan listings and originations are due to increased investor demand, lower rates offered to borrowers and less restrictive underwriting requirements, reflecting the listing driven portiongeneral economic recovery since the start of the administration fee. Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased $22.8 million, a 23% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the non-recurring $30.7 million Colchis contract termination charge incurred in 2016 described in other expenses below. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $32.0 million, a 118% increase from the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to the contract termination charge not recurring in 2017 and higher loan listings on the marketplace. COVID-19 pandemic.

58


Revenues
The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s revenue for the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 20172021, 2020 and December 31, 2016 (in2019 (dollars in thousands):
 Year ended December 31,  
 20182017% Change20172016% Change
Revenues     
Operating Revenues      
Administration Fee Revenue - Related Party$105,709 $101,500 %$101,500 36,630 177 %
Servicing Fees, Net27,943 25,963 %$25,963 28,604 (9)%
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(58,027)(48,691)19 %$(48,691)3,637 (1,439)%
Other Revenues270 170 59 %$170 478 (64)%
Total Operating Revenues75,895 78,942 (4)%78,942 69,349 14 %
Interest Income on Borrower Loans$43,569 $47,208 (8)%$47,208 44,649 %
Interest Expense on Notes$(40,656)$(43,954)(8)%$(43,954)(41,187)%
Net Interest Income2,913 3,254 (10)%3,254 3,462 (6)%
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(701)(514)36 %$(514)(372)38 %
Total Revenues$78,107 $81,682 (4)%$81,682 72,439 13 %
 Year Ended December 31,
 20212020Change% Change20202019Change% Change
REVENUES:
Operating Revenues:     
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$34,017 $21,618 $12,399 57 %$21,618 $49,818 $(28,200)(57)%
Servicing Fees, Net15,770 20,791 (5,021)(24)%20,791 26,368 (5,577)(21)%
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans8,450 6,430 2,020 31 %6,430 (5,058)11,488 227 %
Other Revenue1,312 552 760 138 %552 155 397 256 %
Total Operating Revenues59,549 49,391 10,158 21 %49,391 71,283 (21,892)(31)%
Interest Income on Borrower Loans36,952 36,765 187 %36,765 41,146 (4,381)(11)%
Interest Expense on Notes(34,514)(34,457)(57)— (34,457)(38,492)4,035 (10)%
Total Interest Income (Expense), Net2,438 2,308 130 %2,308 2,654 (346)(13)%
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net770 454 316 70 %454 (375)829 221 %
Total Net Revenues$62,757 $52,153 $10,604 20 %$52,153 $73,562 $(21,409)(29)%
Administration Fee Revenue - Related Party
Prosper Funding primarily generates revenue through license fees it earns under its Administration Agreement with PMI. The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by Prosper FundingPFL to PMI that entitles PMI to use the marketplace for, and
56




in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank under the Loan Account Program Agreement. Effective July 1, 2016 theThe Administration Agreement was amended. The amendments included amendingrequires PMI to pay PFL a monthly license fee that is partially based on the License Fee to includenumber of loan listings posted on the marketplace in that month, as well as a fixed monthlyrebate fee alongside a reduced variable fee and the introduction of a Rebates Fee related tobased on rebates given to investors.investors as an incentive to purchase Borrower Loans from PFL. The increase in 2018Administrative Fee Revenue of $12.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to in 2020 was the result of the increased compensation for rebates in 2018, this was offset by a decrease in the listing driven portion of the administration feeprimarily due to lower listings on the Platform.  The increase in 2017 was the result of an increase in loan listings generated on the listing driven portion of administration fees as a result of higher listings in 2017 andmarketplace during the above changes in the Administration Agreement, which was designed to compensate Prosper Funding for any rebates offered to whole loan investors.respective periods.
Servicing Fee RevenueFees, Net
Prosper Funding earns a fee from investorsInvestors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper Funding through the Whole Loan Channel for servicing such loans on their behalf. Thetypically pay Prosper Funding a servicing fee compensates Prosper Funding for the costs it incurs in servicing these Borrower Loans, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Historically, the servicing fee has been generally set at 1% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the corresponding Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. For loans sold after August 1, 2016, the servicing fee has beenwhich is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the corresponding Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The increaseservicing fee compensates Prosper Funding for the costs incurred in servicing fees in 2018 comparedthe Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to 2017 was due to an increase in collection fees during the periodinvestors and growth in the average unpaid balancemaintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper Funding records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of Borrowers Loans being serviced.operating revenues when received. The decrease in servicing feesServicing Fees of $5.0 million in 2017the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 20162020 was primarily due to a lower outstanding Borrower Loan balance in the decrease in Borrower Loans being serviced as a result of the decrease in loan originations in 2016.servicing portfolio.
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans consists of net gains (losses) on Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan Channel. The higher loss for 2018For the year ended December 31, 2021, PFL recognized a gain of $8.5 million, an increase of $2.0 million over 2020. This increase was due to the increase in rebates of $9.0 million primarily due to warrants issued by PMI to the Consortium (as defined in Note 16 of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements). The higher loss in 2017 was due to an increase in rebates of $52.3 million primarily due to warrants issued by PMI to the Consortium.
59


increased whole loan originations during that period.
Other Revenues
Other Revenues consists primarily of credit referral and incentive fees. Credit referral fees are earned from facilitating securitizationspartner companies for the referral of customers on our platform, while incentive fees are earned from partner companies through our incentive programs. The $0.8 million increase in Other Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to 2020 is primarily due to increased incentive fees generated from a whole loan purchasers. The amounts of other revenues in 2017 and 2018 were not significant.purchaser.
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes
Prosper Funding recognizes interest incomeInterest Income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper Funding believes it to be collectable.collectible. Prosper Funding records interest expense on the corresponding Notes based on the contractual interest rates to the extent Prosper Funding believes they will be collectable.rates. The interest rate charged on the Borrower LoansNotes is generally 1% higherlower than the interest rate on the corresponding NoteBorrower Loans to compensate Prosper Funding for servicing the underlying Borrower Loans.
Overall, the decreasesincrease in net interest income for 2018the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to 2017, and 2017 compared to 2016, were primarily driven by the decrease in volume of Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel.2020, was not significant.
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes,Financial Instruments, Net
TheChange in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net captures gains (losses) in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are estimatedestimates using discounted cash flow methodologies that are based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The mainkey assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Salein these valuations include default and Notes include prepayment rates derived from historical prepayment rates for each credit grade, default rates derived from historical performance recovery rates and discount rates applied to each credit grade based onthat reflect estimates of the perceived credit riskrates of each credit grade. Loans Held for Sale are primarily comprisedreturn that investors would require when investing in other financial instruments with similar characteristics. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans held for short durationsfunded through the Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of the corresponding Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent structure, though differences will arise due to the actual and are recorded using the same approach as the Borrower Loans.projected impact of cash flows related to charge-offs, debt sales and miscellaneous fees.
The following table summarizes the fair value adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020 and 20162019 respectively (in thousands):
Year ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
201820172016202120202019
Borrower LoansBorrower Loans$(31,265)$(25,552)$(25,934)Borrower Loans$(1,141)$(19,210)$(23,185)
NotesNotes30,574 25,031 25,569 Notes1,911 19,664 22,810 
Loans Held for Sale(10)(7)
TotalTotal$(701)$(514)$(372)Total$770 $454 $(375)
57




Expenses
The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020 and 20162019 (in thousands):
 Year ended December 31, Year ended December 31,
 20182017% Change20172016% Change
Expenses      
Administration Fee Expense – Related Party$70,491 $70,359 — %$70,359 $62,203 13 %
Servicing6,140 6,103 %6,103 5,395 13 %
General and Administrative597 379 58 %379 1,321 (71)%
Other— — — %— 30,704 (100)%
Total Expenses$77,228 $76,841 %$76,841 $99,623 (23)%
60


 Year Ended December 31,
 20212020Change% Change20202019Change% Change
Expenses:
Administration Fee – Related Party$52,641 $45,472 $7,169 16 %$45,472 $62,575 $(17,103)(27)%
Servicing6,409 4,900 1,509 31 %4,900 5,012 (112)(2)%
General and Administrative497 380 117 31 %380 33 347 n/a
Total Expenses$59,547 $50,752 $8,795 17 %$50,752 $67,620 $(16,868)(25)%
Administration Fee Expense - Related Party
Pursuant to the Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages the marketplace on behalf of Prosper Funding. Accordingly, each month Prosper Funding is required to pay PMI (a) a corporate administration fee of $500,000 per month, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan originated through the marketplace, (c) 62.5% of all servicing feesServicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) all nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding. The change in 2018 was not significant. The increase in 2017of Administration Fee expense of $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to 2020 was due to higher fees paid on the increased origination volume of borrower loansBorrower Loans in 2021. In general, the Administrative Fee Expense will not fluctuate directly in line with the Administrative Fee Revenue due to the increase in origination volume.flat corporate administrative fee as well as the fact that Prosper Funding pays fees for three different services, but receives a fee based only the number of loans listed on the platform.
Servicing
Servicing costs consist primarily of vendor and borrower costs, andas well as depreciation of internal useinternal-use software costs associated with servicing Borrower Loans. The increase in servicingServicing costs in 2018for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to 2017 was not significant. The increase for 20172020, was primarily due to andriven by the increase in amortizationoriginations and the depreciation of internal use software.internal-use software during this time.
General and Administrative
General and Administrative costs consist primarily of bank service charges and professional fees. The increasechange in generalGeneral and administrativeAdministrative costs in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily due to an increase in outsourced costs. The decrease in 2017 was primarily due to a decrease in outsourced costs.
Other
Other expenses consist of contract termination costs. In November 2016, PMI and Prosper Funding negotiated the termination of a contract with Colchis Capital Management, L.P. ("Colchis"). In exchange for termination of the contract, PMI, on behalf of Prosper Funding, agreed to pay Colchis $9 million and issue a warrant to purchase shares of a new series of preferred stock representing 7% of PMI's capitalization as of the date of issuance for $0.01 per share. The fair value of the warrants at the time of contract termination was $21.7 million. The total of the cash payment and the fair value of the warrants that PMI issued was recorded in Other expenses. Prosper Funding does not expect to incur similar contract termination charges in the future.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited consolidated statement of operations data for each of the eight quarters ended December 31, 2018. The unaudited quarterly statement of operations data set forth below have been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are necessary for a fair statement of the unaudited quarterly statement of operations data. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future operating results. The following quarterly consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information):
61


Quarters Ended December 31, 2018September 30, 2018June 30, 2018March 31, 2018
Revenues 
Operating Revenues 
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party23,956 27,135 30,836 23,783 
Servicing Fees, Net6,826 7,098 7,209 6,812 
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(13,892)(16,379)(16,181)(11,574)
Other Revenues65 70 73 63 
Total Operating Revenues 16,955 17,924 21,937 19,084 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans10,771 10,939 10,907 10,951 
Interest Expense on Notes(10,059)(10,209)(10,177)(10,211)
Net Interest Income 712 730 730 740 
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(87)(250)(255)(109)
Total Net Revenues 17,580 18,404 22,412 19,715 
Expenses 
Administration Fee – Related Party15,454 16,864 20,285 17,887 
Servicing1,628 1,036 1,663 1,814 
General and Administrative135 97 182 183 
Total Expenses 17,217 17,997 22,130 19,884 
Total Net Income 363 407 282 (169)

Quarters Ended December 31, 2017September 30, 2017June 30, 2017March 31, 2017
Revenues 
Operating Revenues 
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party26,840 32,198 27,309 15,153 
Servicing Fees, Net6,937 6,626 6,520 5,879 
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(14,583)(17,399)(13,084)(3,625)
Other Revenues60 45 34 32 
Total Operating Revenues 19,254 21,470 20,779 17,439 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans11,637 12,066 12,007 11,499 
Interest Expense on Notes(10,853)(11,247)(11,177)(10,678)
Net Interest Income 784 819 830 821 
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(317)(173)70 (94)
Total Net Revenues 19,721 22,116 21,679 18,166 
Expenses 
Administration Fee – Related Party17,000 19,078 18,466 15,815 
Servicing1,296 1,553 1,524 1,730 
General and Administrative(125)186 145 173 
Total Expenses 18,171 20,817 20,135 17,718 
Total Net Income 1,550 1,299 1,544 448 

62


Liquidity and Capital Resources (in thousands):
 December 31,
 201820172016
Net Income$879 $4,841 $(27,184)
Net cash provided in operating activities3,041 3,285 14,104 
Net cash used in investing activities(5,245)(6,645)(49,464)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities1,070 (3,237)35,309 
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(1,134)(6,597)(51)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the period148,315 154,912 154,963 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the period$147,181 $148,315 $154,912 
Net cash and cash equivalents decreased for the year ended December 31, 20182021, as compared to 2020 was not significant.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s cash flow activities for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Net Income$3,210 $1,401 $5,942 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$32,685 $30,750 $(12,819)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(65,416)12,994 (11,219)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities59,683 (20,681)(5,282)
Net increase (decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash26,952 23,063 (29,320)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the beginning of the period140,924 117,861 147,181 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the end of the period$167,876 $140,924 $117,861 

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash increased by $27.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, based on the following components:
58




Operating Activities:$32.7 million in cash was provided by operating activities, driven by cash from working capital of $24.1 million, primarily due to the timing of payments to PMI and investors, and $8.6 million from net income, net of non-cash adjustments.
Investing Activities:$65.4 million net cash used in investing activities, due to $232.0 million in purchases of Borrower Loans and $6.1 million in purchases of property and equipment, of $3.3 million and the net $4.9 million less cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as restricted cash. This waspartially offset by the net operating income$172.7 million of $6.0principal payments under Borrower Loans.
Financing Activities:$59.7 million net of non-cash items. Net cash used in investing primarily represents acquisitions of Borrower Loans (excluding acquisition of Borrower Loans sold to unrelated third parties which is included in cash flow from operations along with the corresponding proceeds from sale of Borrower Loans), offset by repayment of Borrower Loans. Net cashwas provided by financing activities, primarily representsdue to $231.9 million in proceeds from the issuance of Notes, at Fair Value, partially offset by $172.3 million in payments onfor Notes, at Fair Value.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and distributions to PMI.
Net cash and cash equivalents decreasedRestricted Cash increased by $23.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020, based on the following components:
Operating Activities: $30.8 million in cash was provided by operating activities, primarily driven by cash from working capital of $21.8 million, primarily due to the timing of payments to PMI and investors, and $9.0 million from net income, net of non-cash adjustments.
Investing Activities: $13.0 million net cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to $149.9 million in principal payments under Borrower Loans, partially offset by purchases of Borrower Loans of $133.6 million and property and equipment of $5.1 million, a $5.8 million distribution to PMI and the net $9.5 million less cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as restricted cash. This was offset by the net operating income of $8.9$3.3 million.
Financing Activities: $20.7 million net of non-cash items. 
Net cash and cash equivalents decreased for the year ended December 31, 2016was used in financing activities, primarily due to a cash distribution$149.4 million in payments for Notes, at Fair Value and $4.5 million in distributions to PMI, of $8.5 million and purchases of property and equipment of $5.6 million,partially offset by net income$133.2 million from proceeds from the issuance of $3.5 million (excluding the non-cash loss on contract termination) and the net $6.0 million additional cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as restricted cash.Notes, at Fair Value.
Income Taxes
Prosper Funding incurred no income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020. Prosper Funding is a USU.S. disregarded entity and the income and loss is included in the return of its parent PMI. Given PMI’s history of operatingtaxable losses, it is difficult to accurately forecast how Prosper’s and Prosper Funding’s results will be affected by the realization and use of net operating loss carry forwards.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As a result of retaining servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, Prosper Funding is a variablean interest holder in certain special purpose entities that purchase these Borrower Loans. None of these special purpose entities are consolidated as Prosper Funding is not the primary beneficiary.
ItemITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, values, or future cash flows that may result from changes in financial market prices and interest rates.
Through the Warehouse LineLines we invest in Borrower Loans classified as heldHeld for sale.Sale. Investments in interest-earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Changes in U.S. interest rates affect the market value of these Borrower Loans Held for Sale held on our balance sheet. The Company’sOur future investment income may fall short of expectations, or the Companywe may suffer a loss in principal if the Company iswe are forced to sell Borrower Loans whichHeld for Sale that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates, as stated above.loss assumptions or overall market conditions. Changes in the market value of Borrower Loans classified as heldHeld for saleSale are recorded through
63


on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The fair value of Borrower Loans which are held on our balance sheet as heldHeld for sale is $183.8Sale was $243.2 million and $274.6 million as of December 31, 2018.2021 and 2020, respectively.
The fair values of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes and Certificates Issued by the related NotesSecuritization Trust are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. Theassumptions such as default rate, prepayment rate and discount rate. Default rate, prepayment rate and discount rate may change due to expected loan performance or changes in the expected returns of similar financial instruments available in the market. We are exposed to the risk of decrease in the fair value of loans held in the warehouse and securitization trusts (prior to deconsolidation in September 2021). For Borrower Loans and Notes presented on our Balance Sheet on behalf of our Note Channel investors, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans are largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment
59




dependent design of the Notes and due to the total principal balances of the Borrower Loans being very close to the total principal balances of the Notes.
The Company isWe are also exposed to variable interest rate risk under the debt from the Warehouse Line,Lines, which had an outstanding balance of $162.5$209.3 million and $242.5 million as of December 31, 2018.2021 and 2020, respectively. To reduce the impact of large fluctuations in interest rates, we hedged a portion of our interest rate risk by entering into a derivative agreement with a financial institution, which is currently out of the money. The derivative agreement that we use to manage the risk associated with fluctuations in interest rates may not be able to eliminate the exposure to these changes. Interest rates are sensitive to numerous factors outside of our control, such as government and central bank monetary policy in the United States. Depending on the size of the exposures and the relative movements of interest rates, if we choose not to hedge or fail to effectively hedge our exposure, we could experience a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
ProsperPMI had cash and cash equivalents of $57.9$67.7 million and $50.1 million as of December 31, 2018,2021 and $45.8 million as of December 31, 2017.2020, respectively. These amounts were held in various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions and short-term, highly liquid marketable securities consisting primarily ofwhich may include money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasuryTreasury securities, and U.S. agency securities. Cash and cash equivalentsCash Equivalents are held for working capital purposes. Due to their short-term nature, Prosper believeswe believe that it doeswe do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of these liquid investments as a result of changes in interest rates. Decreases in short-term interest rates will moderately reduce interest income on these cashCash and cash equivalents while increasesCash Equivalents. Increases in short-term interest rates will moderately increase the interest income earned on these cashthe Cash and cash equivalents.  Cash Equivalents.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Prosper also holds available for sale investments. TheAs more fully described in Note 7 - Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities of our financial statements attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the combined fair value of Prosper’s availableBorrower Loans and Loans Held for sale investment portfolio was $22.2 million and $53.1Sale is $510.8 million as of December 31, 20182021, determined using a weighted-average discount rate of 5.64%. The combined fair value of Borrower Loans (including securitized Borrower Loans, which were deconsolidated from our balance sheet on September 27, 2021) and Loans Held for Sale was $652.9 million as of December 31, 2017, respectively. These investments consisted2020, determined using a weighted-average discount rate of U.S. agency bonds and U.S. Treasury securities. To mitigate the risk of loss, Prosper’s investment policy and strategy is focused first on the preservation of capital and supporting our liquidity requirements, and then maximizing returns. To manage this risk, Prosper limits and monitors maturities, credit ratings, and concentrations within the investment portfolio. Changes in U.S. interest rates affect the interest earned on Prosper’s available for sale investments and the market value of those investments.8.26%. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $40 thousand$5.1 million and $5.8 million in the fair value of Prosper’s availablePMI’s investment in Borrower Loans and Loans Held for sale investmentsSale as of December 31, 2018,2021 and of approximately $330 thousand in the fair value of Prosper’s available for sale investments as of December 31, 2017.2020, respectively. A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in an increase of approximately $40 thousand in the fair value of Prosper’s available for sale investments as of December 31, 2018,$5.3 million and of approximately $330 thousand in the fair value of Prosper’s available for sale investments as of December 31, 2017. Any realized gains or losses resulting from such interest rate changes would only be recorded in the consolidated statement of operations if Prosper sold the investments prior to maturity or the investments were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
Prosper’s investment in Borrower Loans held for sale was $183.8 million as of December 31, 2018. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $1.8$5.9 million in the fair value of Prosper’sour investment in Borrower Loans heldand Loans Held for saleSale as of December 31, 2018. A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in an increase of approximately $1.8 million in the fair value of Prosper’s investment in Borrower Loans held for sale as of December 31, 2018.2021 and 2020, respectively. Any realized or unrealized gains or losses resulting from such interest rate change would be recorded in our statement of operations so long as we hold these Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on our balance sheet.

A portion of the interest rate charged on our Warehouse Lines is currently based on LIBOR. LIBOR has been the subject of reform and was expected to phase out by the end of fiscal 2021; however, on November 30, 2020, the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“ICE”) announced plans to delay the phase out of LIBOR to June 30, 2023. The consequences of the discontinuation of LIBOR cannot be entirely predicted but could impact the interest expense incurred on these debt instruments. We have negotiated alternatives to LIBOR on the PWIT and PWIIT Warehouse Lines, which we may renegotiate before LIBOR ceases to be a widely available reference rate.

PROSPER FUNDING LLC
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, values, or future cash flows that may result from changes in financial market prices and interest rates.
Because balances, interest rates, and maturities of Borrower Loans are matched and offset by an equal balance of Notes with the exact same interest rates (net of our servicing fee) and initial maturities, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the net fair value of the combined Borrower Loan and Note portfolios as a result of changes in interest rates.
The fair values of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and the related Notes are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans are largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and due to the total principal balances of the Borrower Loans being very close to the total principal balances of the Notes.
Prosper Funding had Cash and Cash Equivalents of $10.8 million and $8.6 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These amounts were held in various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions and short term, highly liquid marketable securities which may include money market funds, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash and cash equivalents are held for working capital purposes. Due to their short-term nature, Prosper Funding believes that it does not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of these liquid investments as a result of changes in interest
6460



Item
rates. Decreases in short-term interest rates will moderately reduce interest income on these Cash and Cash Equivalents, while increases in short-term interest rates will moderately increase the interest income earned on these Cash and Cash Equivalent balances.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataFINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The supplementary financial information required by this Item 8 is included in Item 7 under the caption "Quarterly“Quarterly Results of Operations."
ItemITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureCHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ItemITEM 9A. Controls and ProceduresCONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, each Registrant’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of such Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer (PEO) and Principal Financial Officer (PFO), evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of such Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2018.2021. Based upon this evaluation, the PEO and the PFO of each Registrant have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to each Registrant and its subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed in reports filed with, or submitted to, the SEC under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including its PEO and PFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), each Registrant’s management is required to assess the effectiveness of such Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether such Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Management of each Registrant is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Each Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of such Registrant’s financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, internal control over financial reporting determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
6561




The Registrants’ management has assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2021. In making this assessment the Registrants used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).” These criteria are in the areas of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Each Registrant’s assessment included documenting and evaluating the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, the person serving as each Registrant’s PEO and PFO has concluded that such Registrant’s internal controls were effective as of December 31, 2018.2021.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of 2018,2021, there were no changes in the internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act exempts any company that is not a “large accelerated filer” or an “accelerated filer” (as defined by SEC rules) from the requirement that such company obtain an external audit of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, the Registrants are exempt from the requirement that they include in their Annual Report on Form 10-K an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting by an independent registered public accounting firm; however, management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, is still required with respect to the Registrants.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 9B.    Other Information
Not applicable.
In April 2020, we obtained an $8.4 million loan from the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), which was established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) and sponsored by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) in order to provide small businesses with assistance in covering qualified payroll costs, mortgage obligations, leases, and utilities during the economic downturn triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. On March 21, 2022, we received notice from the SBA that our PPP loan was forgiven in full through a forgiveness payment made on March 15, 2022 by the SBA to Broadway National Bank, the lender of our PPP loan.
6662




PART III
ItemITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceDIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Executive Officers, Directors and Key Employees
The following table sets forth information about PMI’s current and imminent executive officers and directors as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
NameAgePosition(s)
David Kimball5148 Chief Executive Officer and DirectorChairman of the Board
Usama Ashraf42 45President and Chief Financial Officer
Nasos TopakasEdward R. Buell III4254 General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer
Pete Woodhouse56Chief Technology Officer
Julie Hwang41 General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Justine Metz52 Executive Vice President, Marketing
Rajeev V. DateAshish Agarwal47Director
Patrick W. Grady36 Director
David R. Golob51 DirectorChief Marketing Officer (as of January 2022)
Claire A. Huang5956 Director
Nigel W. MorrisThomas R. Kearney6360 Director
Mason D. HauptPeter J. deSilva63 60Director
David Kimball has served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of PMI since December 2016. From March 2016 to February 2017, Mr. Kimball served as PMI's Chief Financial Officer. In May 2019, Mr. Kimball was appointed Chairman of the Board. He also currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and a director of PFL. Prior to joining PMI, Mr. Kimball was Senior Financial Officer of United Services Automobile Association's (USAA) Chief Operating Office, with financial responsibility for the real estate unit, the bank, the P&C and life insurance companies, the investment management company, and the call centers/distribution functions. Before his position as Senior Financial Officer of USAA's Chief Operating Office, Mr. Kimball spent eight years in various finance roles at USAA, including Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance; Corporate Treasurer; Chief Financial Officer of USAA Federal Savings Bank; and Assistant Vice President of Capital Markets. Prior to his time at USAA, Mr. Kimball spent ten years at Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company in both the U.S. and U.K., working on their securitization programs, debt issuance, and a variety of financial planning and analysis positions. Mr. Kimball holds an M.B.A. and a B.A. in English from Brigham Young University. PMI believes that Mr. Kimball's financial and business expertise give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Usama Ashrafhas served as PMI’s President since March 2021 and as its Chief Financial Officer of PMI since February 2017. He is currently responsible for Prosper's finance, capital markets, credit, enterprise risk and databusiness intelligence functions. He also currently serves as President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and a director of PFL. Prior to joining PMI, from February 2016 to February 2017, Mr. Ashraf served as Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer at Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (“Annaly”). Prior to his time at Annaly, Mr. Ashraf worked at United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”), where he served as Corporate Treasurer from November 2014 to February 2016 and Assistant Corporate Treasurer from January 2014 to October 2014. Before joining USAA, Mr. Ashraf spent 13 years at CIT Group, where he held various positions in the Treasury and Corporate M&A departments, most recently serving as Deputy Treasurer with responsibility for the firm’s Treasury activities in the United States. He started his career in the investment banking division of Salomon Smith Barney/Citigroup focused on M&A. Mr. Ashraf received a B.S. in Economics, with concentrations in Finance and Accounting, from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
67


Nasos Topakas Edward “Ted” R. Buell IIIhas served as Chief Technology Officer since April 2017. Prior to joining PMI, from June 2010 to February 2017, Mr. Topakas served as Chief Technology Officer at Art.com, Inc., an online wall art and contemporary decor retailer, where he was head of all technology and product departments, with responsibility for the overall technology vision, strategy, engineering execution, and architectural direction. Prior to his time at Art.com, Inc., Mr. Topakas worked at SendMe, Inc., where he served as Chief Technology Officer from November 2007 to May 2010. As Chief Technology Officer of SendMe, Inc., Mr. Topakas was head of all technology departments, including Engineering, Architecture, Technical Project Office, QA, Technical Ops and Corporate IT. Mr. Topakas participated in the M.B.A. executive program from Golden Gate University and holds a B.S. in Computer Science from San Francisco State University.
Julie Hwang has served as PMI’s Secretary and General Counsel and Secretary since AprilMarch 2021, and its Chief Compliance Officer since June 2018. Ms. Hwang previously served as PMI’s Deputy General Counsel from January 2017 to April 2018 and Assistant General Counsel from August 2015 to January 2017. Ms. HwangMr. Buell also currently serves as PFL’s Secretary, a position shehe has held since April 2018.March 2021. Prior to that, Mr. Buell served as PMI’s Deputy General Counsel from June 2018 to March 2021, its Assistant General Counsel and Deputy Chief Compliance Officer from January 2017 to June 2018 and its Senior Corporate Counsel from September 2015 to January 2017. Before joining PMI in AugustSeptember 2015, Ms. HwangMr. Buell served as Associate General Counsel at One Kings Lane, Inc., a home décor and luxury furniture retailer, from May 2014 to August 2015. Prior to One Kings Lane, Ms. Hwang worked as an attorney at the law firms of Orrick, HerringtonSeverson & Sutcliffe LLP for 7 yearsWerson P.C., advising and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. for 3 years. Ms. Hwang hasrepresenting financial services clients in regulatory matters and litigation, from April 2010 to September 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Buell served as Assistant General Counsel at GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., a national mortgage bank that originated, sold and serviced mortgage loans, from September 2005 to April 2010. Mr. Buell holds a J.D. from UCLAthe University of Miami School of Law and a B.A. degree in International RelationsCriminology, Law and Society from Stanford University.
Justine Metz has served as PMI’s Executive Vice President, Marketing since December 2017. Prior to joining PMI, Ms. Metz served as Chief Marketing and Products Officer at SRS Acquiom Inc., an M&A transaction management platform based in San Francisco, from 2015 to 2016. Prior to SRS Acquiom, Ms. Metz was Chief Marketing Officer for the Wealth Management businesses of Bank of America Corporation from 2011 to 2015, where she was responsible for overall marketing and sales support strategy, including branding and segmentation, content and social media, and data and analytics. Before serving as Chief Marketing Officer, Ms. Metz spent an additional two years as a senior executive of the Global Wealth & Investment Management and Merrill Edge marketing teams at Bank of America. In earlier roles, Ms. Metz served as Senior Vice President for Fidelity Investments, Morgan Stanley and General Electric. Ms. Metz holds a B.S.B.A. in Marketing from Georgetown University.
Rajeev V. Date has served as one of PMI’s directors since July 2013. Mr. Date previously served as one of PMI’s directors from January 2009 to September 2010, and he is currently a director of Megalith Financial Acquisition Corp. and Green Dot Corporation. Mr. Date currently serves as the Managing Partner of Fenway Summer LLC, a U.S. financial advisory and investment firm. From January 2012 to January 2013, Mr. Date served as the Deputy Director of the United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). Before being appointed Deputy Director, Mr. Date was appointed the Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury for the CFPB, and, in that capacity, acted as the interim leader of the CFPB. From October 2010 to August 2011, Mr. Date served as Associate Director of Research, Markets, and Regulations of the CFPB. Prior to joining the CFPB, Mr. Date served as Chairman & Executive Director of Cambridge Winter Center for Financial Institutions Policy, a non-profit nonpartisan think tank focused on financial institutions policy, from March 2009 to September 2010. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Date served as a Managing Director in the Financial Institutions Group at Deutsche Bank Securities, where his key responsibility was acting as a coverage officer for specialty finance firms and regional banks. Before that, Mr. Date was Senior Vice President for Corporate Strategy and Development at Capital One Financial, where he led M&A development efforts across the U.S. banking and specialty finance markets. He began his business career in the financial institutions practice of the consulting firm McKinsey & Company. He has also served as an attorney, in both private practice and government. Mr. Date received a J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School and a B.S. (highest honors) from University of California, Berkeley. PMI believes that Mr. Date’s financial, business and regulatory expertise give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director. Mr. Date qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" under SEC guidelines.Irvine.
Patrick W. Grady has served as one of PMI’s directors since January 2013. Mr. Grady is a Partner of Sequoia Capital, a private investment partnership, which he joined in 2007. Prior to joining Sequoia Capital, Mr. Grady was an Associate at Summit Partners from 2004 to 2007. He is also a current director of Okta, Inc. Mr. Grady holds a B.S. in Economics and Finance from Boston College. PMI believes that Mr. Grady’s experience as a venture capital investor with a focus on financial technologies and his overall management experience, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director. Mr. Grady qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" under SEC guidelines.
6863



David R. Golob 
Pete Woodhousehas served as onePMI’s Chief Technology Officer since July 2021. Before joining PMI, Mr. Woodhouse was the Chief Technology Officer and Head of PMI’s directors since May 2014.Product at Sibly, an employee mental health coaching text-based platform. Prior to his time at Sibly, Mr. Golob has beenWoodhouse spent 7 years in a Partnervariety of technology roles at Francisco Partners,PayPal, including as the Chief Technology Officer at PayPal Credit and as the Senior Director at PayPal Global Solutions Engineering. In Mr. Woodhouse’s role as Chief Technology Officer at PayPal Credit, he was responsible for building and integrating multiple credit products into the PayPal platform structure. Prior to his time at PayPal, Mr. Woodhouse held various product development and technology roles at PRTM, a private equity firm, since 2001.management consulting subsidiary of PwC, Agilent Technologies, an analytical instrumentation development and manufacturing company, and spent 10 years at Hewlett-Packard Company. Mr. Golob recently served on the board of directors of Barracuda Networks,Woodhouse also currently serves as an Engineering Leadership Mentor at Plato, a security, application deliverymentorship program that aims to build soft skills in engineering and data protection solutions provider, from 2005 until 2018.product managers. Mr. GolobWoodhouse holds an A.B. degreeMBA from Santa Clara University and a Bachelor of Science in chemistry from Harvard College and an M.B.A. degreeElectrical Engineering from the Stanford Graduate SchoolUniversity of Business.Plymouth (England).

Ashish Agarwal has served as PMI’s Chief Marketing Officer since January 2022. Mr. Agarwal has experience leading growth for multiple lending and payment fintech companies. Prior to joining PMI, believes that Mr. Golob’s financialAgarwal served as Chief Marketing Officer at Plastiq, a business-to-business payment platform. Prior to Plastiq, Mr. Agarwal spent 3 years at Humana, a Fortune 50 health insurance and business expertise,healthcare company, as the line-of-business Chief Marketing Officer for Humana’s Pharmacy division. Prior to Humana, Mr. Agarwal served as Chief Growth Officer for 4 years at Remitly, a digital remittance company. During his time as Chief Growth Officer, Mr. Agarwal built and led Remitly’s global marketing strategy from its early stages through several financing rounds. Prior to his time at Remitly, Mr. Agarwal held various marketing, strategy and analytics roles for 7 years at Capital One Financial Corporation, including his experience in the private equityas Vice President of Marketing and venture capital industries analyzing, investing inAnalytics and serving on the boardsas Director of directors of technology companies, give him the qualifications and skills to servePartnerships Deal Valuations. Mr. Agarwal also currently serves as a director.Venture Partner with NextGen Venture Partners, which invests in early-stage technology companies. Mr. Agarwal holds an MBA from Vanderbilt University and a Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (India).
Claire A. Huang has served as a director of PMI since December 2017. Ms. Huang is currently a member of the board of directors of SigFig, a robo-investing and customer engagement software provider, Zions Bancorporation N.A., a regional bank, Filinvest Development Corporation, a Philippines-based real estate development company, and PODS, a leading storage and moving company,company. She is a member of the audit committee and shecompensation committee of Zions Bancorporation N.A. She is also a member of the corporate governance committee, the related-party transaction committee, and chairwoman of the digital committee of Filinvest Development Corporation. She previously served as a director of Mirador Financial, Inc., a small business lending platform, from 2017 to 2018, and Scottrade, a leading online brokerage firm, from 2015 to 2017. Ms. Huang has extensive experience in marketing and brand management. She served as the first global Chief Marketing Officer of JP Morgan Chase from 2012 to 2014, where she worked with the marketing teams across all Chase retail and JP Morgan wholesale businesses to build brands and businesses with a customer focus. Before joining JP Morgan Chase, from 2008 to 2012, Ms. Huang held global head of marketing positions at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, where she was responsible for a number of high profile marketing initiatives, including the integration of Merrill Lynch and Bank of America and the launch of Merrill Edge, the company’s brokerage platform. Prior to her time at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Ms. Huang held marketing leadership positions at Fidelity Investments, American Express Company, Wise Foods, and The Haagen-DazsHäagen-Dazs Company. Ms. Huang received a B.A. in Economics from De La Salle University in Manila, Philippines. PMI believes that Ms. Huang’s marketing and brand management expertise, as well as her experience at several leading financial institutions, give her the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Nigel W. Morris Thomas R. Kearneyhas was appointed as a director of PMI in May 2020. Mr. Kearney is currently a member of the Board of Directors and Finance Committee of the Plattsburgh College Foundation, a non-profit organization affiliated with the State University of New York at Plattsburgh. Mr. Kearney is also a member of the Board of Directors of the YMCA of San Francisco, a non-profit organization (“YSF”). Additionally, he is YSF Finance Committee Chair and a member of the YSF Board Executive Committee. Mr. Kearney is a CPA with extensive technical accounting and auditing experience. He previously worked at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for nearly 35 years and served as oneAssurance Partner for 20 years. In this role, Mr. Kearney helped financial services clients navigate a wide range of PMI’s directors since June 2014.complex financial instruments, credit arrangements and operational processes and controls. Prior to PwC, Mr. Morris previously servedKearney conducted periodic reserve reporting for the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and assisted with the implementation of Regulation D and Contemporaneous Reserve Reporting. Mr. Kearney holds a B.S. in Accounting from State University of New York at Plattsburgh. PMI believes that Mr. Kearney’s financial, business, and regulatory expertise give him the qualification and skills to serve as onea director. Mr. Kearney qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC guidelines.

64




Peter J. deSilva was appointed as a director of PMI’s directorsPMI in April 2021. Mr. deSilva is currently a Harvard University Senior Fellow in the Advanced Leadership Initiative through May 2022. His fellowship includes participating in an advanced leadership curriculum with more than 50 other fellows from December 2009 to January 2013.around the world, participating in various courses, mentoring other graduate and undergraduate students and developing a program with significant social impact potential. Mr. Morris isdeSilva also currently serves as a director on the managing partnerBoard of QED Investors,Directors at Infosel Financiero SA de CV, a financial technological platform and business news agency that operates in Mexico and Latin America, and currently serves as a director on the Board of Directors at Fidelity Security Life Insurance Company, an investment firm he founded in 2008.insurance services provider. Mr. Morris was also the co-founder of Capital One Financial Services, where he served as President and Chief Operating Officer and Vice Chairman from 1994 until his retirement in 2004. HedeSilva also serves as a director of GreenSky,Fidelity Security Assurance Company, a subsidiary of Fidelity Security Life Insurance Company. Mr. deSilva previously served as the President of TD Ameritrade’s retail business and as President of TD Ameritrade, Inc. the firms broker dealer from September 2017 to December 2020. In his role, Mr. Morris hasdeSilva directed all facets of the division’s business strategy and operations, and integration with Scottrade Financial Services, another leading online brokerage firm. Prior to joining TD Ameritrade, from February 2015 to August 2017, Mr. deSilva served as the President of the Retail and Institutional divisions of Scottrade Financial Services, where he was responsible for the corporate strategy and distribution, sales, digital transformation, investment management, and institutional custody functions. Mr. deSilva also served on Scottrade, Inc.’s Board of Directors from February 2015 - to August 2017. Before joining Scottrade Financial Services, from 2004 to 2015, Mr. deSilva served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of UMB Financial Corporation, a BScfinancial services provider. Mr. deSilva also served on UMB Financial Corporation’s Board of Directors from February 2004 to December 2015. Prior to his time at UMB Financial Corporation, Mr. deSilva worked at Fidelity Investments, a leading online brokerage firm, where he held several leadership positions, including Senior Vice President and General Manager of Fidelity Investments’ Retail division and Senior Vice President of Fidelity Brokerage Company. Mr. deSilva holds a B.S. in PsychologyBusiness Administration and Management from the University of East London in London, EnglandMassachusetts, Dartmouth. Mr. deSilva also holds Series 7, 24, 63 and an MBA with distinction66 licenses from London Business School.the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. PMI believes that Mr. Morris’sdeSilva’s financial, business and businessregulatory expertise including his diversified background of managing and directing public companies, his experience with financial services firms, as well as his general operational and management experience, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.
Mason D. Haupt has served as one of PMI’s directors since February 2018. He has more than 30 years of experience working in the investment management business. Mr. Haupt served as a Portfolio Manager at Soros Fund Management, LLC, a private investment management firm, from August 2008 to March 2014, and prior to that, from 2006 to 2008, he engaged in private investment activities. From June 2003 to March 2006, Mr. Haupt was a Partner at Five Mile Capital Partners, LLC, an alternative investment and asset management company. During his time at Five Mile Capital Partners, Mr. Haupt served as Portfolio Manager of the company’s Housatonic Fund, a relative value, fixed income hedge fund. Mr. Haupt served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MortgageSight, an electronic platform for mortgage securities, from 2000 to 2001. Previously, he spent more than a decade with Salomon Brothers, culminating in the position of Managing Director of the Mortgage Securities Department. Mr. Haupt received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a B.S. in Economics, with concentrations in Management and Accounting, from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. PMI believes that Mr. Haupt’s financial and business expertise, including his extensive investment management experience, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director. 
Board Composition and Election of Directors
PMI’s board of directors currently consists of eight seats, with one vacancy to be filled by a designee of the Series A Holders, one vacancy to be filled by a designee of the Series A-1 Holders, one vacancy to be filled by a designee of Francisco Partners III, L.P., and one vacancy to be filled by a designee of the Series F Holders. All of the current members of PMI's board of directors were elected as directors pursuant to the terms of a voting rights agreement entered into among certain of PMI’s stockholders. In selecting the composition of its board of directors, PMI seeks to ensure that its board of directors collectively has a balance of expertise in the following areas: internet basedinternet-based business, consumer financial products and experience directing public and start-up companies. Based on these criteria, PMI believes that its board of directors has been effective in identifying diverse directors. The board of directors’ composition provisions of PMI’s voting rights agreement are still in effect. For more information regarding the terms of the voting rights agreement, see Item 13, "Certain“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence." Holders of the Notes offered through our marketplace, and the accompanying PMI Management Rights, will have no ability to elect or influence PMI’s directors or approve significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of PMI or its assets.
69


Board Leadership
Because PMI’s common stock is not listed on a national exchange, PMI is not required to maintain a board of directors consisting of a majority of independent directors, or to maintain an audit, nominating or compensation committee. PMI does not have a lead independent director.
Code of Ethics
Our Board of Directors is committed to a high standard of corporate governance practices and, through its oversight role, believes that it has encouraged and promoted a requisite culture of ethical business conduct among PMI’s officers and employees. To memorialize its commitment to these standards, the Board of Directors of PMI adopted a “Code of Ethics and Business Conduct” that applies to all of PMI's employees, directors and officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website at www.prosper.com/plp/legal. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendment to, or waiver from, certain provisions of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on Prosper'sour website or in public filings.
Director Independence
Because PMI’s common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association or to issuers of such securities, PMI is not required to maintain a board of directors consisting of a majority of independent directors or to maintain an audit committee, nominating committee or compensation committee consisting solely of independent directors. Nevertheless, PMI’s board of directors has determined the
65




independence of each director based on the independence criteria set forth in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). In making its determinations, the Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with Prosperus and all other facts and circumstances the board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including any transactions between each director or any member of his or her family, and Prosper, itsus, our senior management or our independent registered public accounting firm. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, the board of directors determined that Ms. Huang and each of Messrs. Date, Grady, Golob, HauptKearney and MorrisdeSilva do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE. PMI’s board of directors has also determined that our former director, Rajeev V. Date, was independent under those standards during the period in 2021 that he served on the board. Mr. Date resigned from PMI’s board of directors effective March 26, 2021.
Board Committees
Nominating Committee
PMI is not a “listed issuer” as defined under Section 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Therefore, PMI is not required to have a nominating committee comprised of independent directors. PMI currently does not have a standing nominating committee and accordingly, there are no charters for such committee. PMI believes that a nominating committee is not necessary for a company of its size with its type of business. PMI also believes that its directors collectively have the requisite background, experience, and knowledge to fulfill the limited duties and obligations that a nominating committee may have.
Compensation Committee
PMI’s board of directors approved the formation of a Compensation Committee in August 2011. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Patrick W. Grady (Chair), Mason D. Haupt, and Claire A. Huang.Huang (Chairwoman) and Thomas R. Kearney. The Compensation Committee oversees PMI’s executive officer compensation arrangements, plans, policies and programs maintained by PMI and administers PMI’s equity-based compensation plan for employees generally (including issuance of stock options, RSUs and other equity-based awards granted other than pursuant to a plan). The Compensation Committee meets at such times as determined appropriate by the Chair of the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee is exempt from independence listing standards because PMI's common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association or to issuers of such securities. Nevertheless, the board of directors of PMI has determined that each of the current members of PMI'sPMI’s Compensation Committee is independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and NYSE.
70


Audit Committee
PMI’s board of directors approved the formation of an Audit Committee in January 2010. The current members of the Audit Committee are Rajeev V. Date (Chair)Thomas R. Kearney (Chairman) and Patrick W. Grady.Peter J. deSilva. The Audit Committee oversees financial risk exposures, including monitoring the integrity of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, internal controls over financial reporting and the independence of PMI’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee receives internal control related assessments and reviews and discusses PMI’s annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements with management. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to compliance matters, the Audit Committee meets at least quarterly with management, PMI’s Independent Registered Public Accounting firm and PMI’s internal legal counsel to discuss risks related to PMI’s financial reporting function.
The Audit Committee is exempt from independence listing standards because PMI's common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association or to issuers of such securities. Nevertheless, the board of directors of PMI has determined that each of the current members of PMI's Audit Committee is independent under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE, and also satisfies the independence requirements of Section 10(m)(3) of the Exchange Act. Additionally, PMI's board of directors has determined that each of the current members of the Audit Committee is an audit committee financial expert as defined under SEC regulations and the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE. The board of directors has also determined that Rajeev V. Date, who served as a member of the Audit Committee until March 2021, was independent under those standards during the period in 2021 that he served on the Audit Committee. Mr. Date resigned from PMI’s board of directors and Audit Committee effective March 26, 2021.
66




Limitations on Officers’ and Directors’ Liability and Indemnification Agreements
As permitted by Delaware law, PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that limit or eliminate the personal liability of its directors for breaches of duty to the corporation. PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws limit the liability of directors to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breaches of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:
any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to PMI or PMI’s stockholders;
any act or omission not in good faith, believed to be contrary to the interests of PMI or its shareholders, involving reckless disregard for the director’s duty, for acts that involve an unexcused pattern of inattention that amounts to an abdication of duty, or that involves intentional misconduct or knowing or culpable violation of law;
any unlawful payments related to dividends, unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions, loans, guarantees or other distributions; or
any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
These limitations do not affect the availability of equitable remedies, including injunctive relief or rescission. As permitted by Delaware law, PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that:
PMI will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law;
PMI may indemnify its other employees and other agents to the same extent that PMI indemnifies its officers and directors; and
PMI will advance expenses to its directors and officers in connection with a legal proceeding, and may advance expenses to any employee or agent; provided, however, that such advancement of expenses shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by the person to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that the person was not entitled to be indemnified.
The indemnification provisions contained in PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not exclusive.
71


In addition to the indemnification provided for in PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, PMI has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and officers. The indemnification agreements require PMI, among other things, to indemnify such persons for all expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement (if such settlement is approved in advance by PMI) (collectively, “Expenses”), actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the investigation, defense or appeal of any proceeding to which such person may be made a party, a potential party, a non-party witness, or otherwise by reason of: (i) such person’s service as a director or officer of PMI; (ii) any action or inaction taken by such person or on such person’s part while acting as director, officer, employee or agent of PMI; or (iii) such person’s actions while serving at the request of PMI as a director, officer, employee, trustee, general partner, managing member, agent or fiduciary of PMI or any other entity, in each case, whether or not serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is or was incurred. In addition, PMI is required to indemnify against any Expenses actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any action establishing or enforcing a right to indemnification or advancement of expenses under the indemnification agreement or under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies maintained by PMI to the extent that such person is successful in such action. The indemnification agreements also provide that PMI agrees to indemnify such persons to the fullest extent permitted by law, even if such indemnification is not specifically authorized by the other provisions of the agreement or PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws. Moreover, the indemnification agreements provide that any future changes under Delaware law that expand the ability of a Delaware corporation to indemnify its officers and directors are automatically incorporated into the agreements.
Under the indemnification agreements, PMI is not obligated to provide indemnification on account of any proceeding unless such person acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of PMI, and with respect to criminal proceedings, such person had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of a proceeding by judgment, settlement, or conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent does not, by itself, create the presumption that such person did not satisfy the above standards. In addition, under the indemnification agreements, PMI is not obligated to provide indemnification for: (i) any proceedings or claims initiated or brought voluntarily by such person and not by way of defense, unless such indemnification is authorized by PMI, other than a proceeding to establish such person’s right to indemnification; (ii) any expenses incurred by such person with respect to any proceeding instituted by such person to enforce and interpret the terms of his indemnification agreement, unless such person is successful in such action; (iii) which payment has actually been made to or on behalf of such person under any statute, insurance policy, indemnity provision, vote or otherwise, except with respect to any excess beyond the amount paid; (iv) an accounting or disgorgement of profits pursuant to
67




Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, as amended, or similar provisions of federal, state or local statutory law or common law, if such person is held liable therefor (including pursuant to any settlement arrangements); and (v) any reimbursement of PMI by such person of any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation or of any profits realized by such person from the sale of securities of PMI, as required in each case under the Exchange Act, as amended (including any such reimbursements that arise from an accounting restatement of PMI pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or the payment to PMI of profits arising from the purchase and sale by such person of securities in violation of Section 306 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), if such person is held liable therefor (including pursuant to any settlement arrangements).
PMI also maintains an insurance policy that covers certain liabilities of its directors and officers arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers.
PMI believes that these provisions and agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. To the extent these provisions permit PMI to indemnify its officers and directors for liabilities arising under the Securities Act, however, PMI has been informed by the SEC that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
ItemITEM 11. Executive Compensation EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
- Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview

This section describes PMI's executive compensation objectives, compensation-setting process, executive compensation components and significant 20182021 compensation decisions for PMI's named executive officers ("NEOs"(“NEOs”). The
72


compensation provided to PMI's NEOs for 20182021 is set forth in detail in the Summary Compensation Table and other tables and the accompanying footnotes and narrative that follow this section.
PMI's named executive officers for 20182021 are as follows:
David Kimball, our Chief Executive Officer;Officer;
Usama Ashraf, our President and Chief Financial OfficerOfficer;
;Pete Woodhouse, our Chief Technology Officer as of July 1, 2021;
Edward R. Buell III, our General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer; and
Nasos Topakas, our Chief Technology Officer;Officer through March 15, 2021.
Julie Hwang, our General Counsel and Secretary as of June 1, 2018; and
Justine Metz, our Executive Vice President, Marketing.

Executive Compensation Objectives
The objectives of PMI's executive compensation are to:
attract, retain and motivate senior leaders who are capable of advancing PMI's mission and strategy and ultimately, creating and maintaining its long-term equity value;
align the interests of PMI's executive officers with its stockholders’ long-term interests; and
reward executive officers for their contributions to PMI's overall performance as well as for their individual performance.

Compensation-Setting Process
Role of Our Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing all aspects of our executive compensation program, including evaluating and approving executive salaries, annual bonus awards and the size and structure of equity awards for PMI's executive officers, including the NEOs.
Role of Management. In setting 20182021 compensation, PMI's Chief Executive Officer worked closely with the Compensation Committee in making recommendations and attending Committee meetings. Because of his daily involvement with PMI's executive team, the Chief Executive Officer was involved in the determination of compensation for all of PMI's executive officers other than himself. The Compensation Committee also delegated to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to make compensation decisions for senior management and executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer), subject to certain compensation limits set by the Compensation Committee.
Role of Compensation Consultant. In addition, the Compensation Committee engaged an independent compensation consultant to provide executive compensation advisory services, including reviewing our executive compensation packages, developing an appropriate group of peer companies to serve as market reference points for compensation comparison purposes, and assessing how our executive compensation program compares to current market executive compensation practices generally. The Compensation Committee retained Radford, a business unit of Aon plc, to conduct this review and analysis for 2018. 
Use of Comparative Market Data. To assist the Compensation Committee with evaluating our 2018 executive compensation program, Radford identified several peer companies in the San Francisco Bay Area comprised of then-privately held software companies with over $80 million in invested capital. We will continue to evaluate and update the criteria used for selecting our compensation peer group to ensure that it is appropriately scoped to our business and reflects changing market conditions.
Based on these criteria, Radford identified the following peer group of companies:
7368


Adaptive Insights 
DataStax Lookout SugarCRM 
Anaplan Delivery Agent Medallia Talend 
AppDynamics Eventbrite Memebox The RealReal 
Automattic Fastly Minted Turn 
Blue Jeans Network FinancialForce MobiTV Udemy 
Campaign Monitor USA Forescout Technologies MuleSoft Zenefits 
Coupa Software GitHub Okta 
Credit Karma Glassdoor SoFi 
In January 2018, our Compensation Committee reviewed Radford's analysis and recommendations with respect to our compensation packages and determined that our compensation packages were competitive relative to our peers. While the Compensation Committee considered the analysis and recommendations from our independent compensation consultant when setting 2018 compensation levels, the Committee did not benchmark to any particular level or rely on Radford's report to set any specific targets relative to a particular company or the peer group. Rather, our Compensation Committee relied on the knowledge and experience of its members, as well as recommendations from PMI management, to set executive compensation levels. 

Executive Compensation Components

PMI's 2018 Named Executive Officerexecutive compensation packages include:package includes: (1) base salary; (2) cash bonuses; and (3) equity-based compensationlong term incentives, generally in the form of cash and equity-based compensation, such as stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs).units. PMI believes that this compensation mix supports its objective of attracting, motivating and retaining a talented and entrepreneurial executive team who will provide leadership for Prosper’sPMI’s success in dynamic and competitive markets. PMI's compensation program is balanced among all three components in order to attract top talent and maximize retention, while ensuring that an appropriate portion of the executives’ compensation is tied to the Company's and its stockholders’ long-term interests.

Base Salary
Base Salary.Base salary is a fixed amount, and is not tied to any metric relating to the performance of PMI's business as a whole. The base salary of each executive officer is initially established in the executive officer's offer letter, and reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee. In determining base salaries for 2018,2021, PMI's Compensation Committee together with the Chief Executive Officer considered the individual executive officer's scope of responsibilities, contributions, prior salary level and position (in case of a promotion), and financial and market conditions.

The following table summarizes information regarding the base salaries for PMI's named executive officers for 2018:
2021:
Name 20182021 Base SalarySalaries
David Kimball (1)1
$500,000550,000 
Usama Ashraf (2)2
$420,000447,000 
Nasos Topakas (3)Pete Woodhouse 3
$360,000375,000 
Julie Hwang (4)Edward R. Buell III 4
$325,000335,000 
Justine Metz (5)Nasos Topakas 5
$325,000385,000 

11.In March 2018,2021, PMI’s Compensation Committee reviewed executive base salaries and decided to keep Mr. Kimball’s annual base salary at $500,000,$550,000, the same level as the previouslast year.
22.In March 2018,2021, PMI’s Compensation Committee reviewed executive base salaries and decided to increasekeep Mr. Ashraf's annual base salary at $447,000, the same level as last year.
3.In July 2021, PMI hired Mr. Woodhouse as its Chief Technology Officer, with an annual base salary of $375,000.
4.In March 2021, Mr. Buell’s annual base salary was increased from $350,000$275,625 to $400,000.  In August 2018,$335,000 in connection with Mr. Ashraf's expanded scopehis promotion to General Counsel and Secretary of responsibilities, the Compensation Committee increased his annual base salary from $400,000 to $420,000.PMI.
35.In March 2018,2021, PMI’s Compensation Committee reviewed executive base salaries and decided to increasekeep Mr. Topakas'Topakas’ annual base salary at $385,000, the same level as last year. Mr. Topakas departed from $350,000 to $360,000.
4In June 2018,his role as Chief Technology Officer of PMI promoted Ms. Hwang from Interim General Counsel to General Counsel. Ms. Hwang's annual base salary is $325,000.
74


5In December 2017, PMI hired Ms. Metz as its Executive Vice President, Marketing, with an annual base salary of $315,000. Ineffective March 2018, PMI's Compensation Committee reviewed executive base salaries and decided to increase Ms. Metz's annual base salary from $315,000 to $325,000.

15, 2021.
Cash Bonuses. The Company
PMI uses cash bonuses primarily to motivate and retain senior management leaders that are critical to advancing the Company's short-short-term and long-term strategic goals. In 2018,2021, we based annual NEO bonuses on both the achievement of certain Board-approved financial, operational and strategic performance objectives as well as other factors, including the NEO’s contribution toward PMI’s growth initiativestowards the successful development and performance toward individual goal achievement.

launch of the Credit Card product.
In January 2019,2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s performance and progress towards the established 20182021 objectives, and approved a bonus award of 90%up to 100% of the annual target bonus amount for each NEO. In addition to these annual performance bonuses, in 2018, the Compensation Committee also awarded retention bonuses to certain executive officers in order to incentivize and encourage them to remain with the Company.

The amounts and terms of the bonuses awarded to each of theour NEOs in 2018for 2021 are disclosed below, in the sections titled "Summary“Summary Compensation Table"Table” and “Narrative Discussion of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.”

Long-Term Incentives
Equity CompensationCompensation.. PMI has used stock options and restricted stock units ("RSUs"(“RSUs”) as the principal components of its executive long-term incentive equity compensation. Consistent with its compensation objectives, PMI believes this approach aligns the interests of its grantees with the long-term interests of PMI’s stockholders. PMI believes that stock options and RSUs also serve as effective retention tools due to vesting requirements that are based on continued service with the company. In granting equity awards, PMI has customarily considered, among other things, the executive officers' cash compensation, the need to retain and motivate executive officers and to create a meaningful opportunity for reward predicated on the creation of
69




long-term stockholder value, PMI's financial results, and each executive officer's individual contributions and responsibilities. In 2018, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of stock options and RSUs to its NEOs for performance compensation, retention and motivational purposes. The amounts and terms of the awards granted to each of the NEOssuch NEO in 20182021 are disclosed in the 20182021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and accompanying footnotes to the table of Outstanding Equity Awards at 20182021 Fiscal Year End.
Long-Term Cash Incentive Compensation. PMI’s Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (“LTCIP”) is designed to reward our executives, including our named executive officers, for the achievement of strategic and operational objectives and the creation of long-term value. Under the LTCIP, eligible executive officers and vice presidents will receive long-term cash incentive awards based on their performance during pre-established two-year periods, the first of which ran from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 (the “2020-2021 Performance Period”). Payments will be made by March 15, following the end of a performance period, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee. The incentive targets range from 75% to 150% of the participant’s base salary, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee. PMI’s executive officers and vice presidents are eligible to participate in the LTCIP if, as of the date the award is paid, they have been employed with PMI for at least three years, are currently full or part time employees of PMI, and are in good standing. PMI believes that the LTCIP will complement its annual equity awards by focusing its senior executives on specific long-term financial performance goals, while providing an opportunity for more immediate liquidity. In January 2022, the Compensation Committee considered the Company’s performance and progress towards its established objectives during the 2020-2021 Performance Period, and approved a payout of up to 90% of the LTCIP incentive target amount for each NEO. The amounts of the LTCIP awards paid to eligible NEOs in connection with the 2020-2021 Performance Period are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.
Employment Agreements

PMI has entered into employment arrangements with each of its NEOs, which are comprised of an offer letter and an At WillAt-Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment and Arbitration Agreement. Each of these arrangements was approved or authorized on PMI’s behalf by the Compensation Committee or, in certain instances, its Board of Directors.

Each of the offer letters providedprovides for "at will"“at-will” employment and sets forth the initial compensation arrangements for the NEO, generally including an initial base salary, an annual cash bonus opportunity, and an equity award. Certain of the offer letters provide for payments or an acceleration of the executive'sexecutive’s equity award grant upon termination of their employment in specified situations, including following a change in control. These arrangements (including potential payments and terms) are discussed in more detail in the “Narrative Discussion of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” and the "Potential“Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or a Change in Control"In Control of PMI” sections and related tables below.

Other Compensation Information

Benefits Programs

PMI'sPMI’s employee benefit programs, including its 401(k) plan, health and welfare programs, and incentive programs, including the Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan, andthe 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and the Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan, are designed to provide a competitive level of benefits to PMI'sPMI’s employees generally, including its named executive officers and their families. PMI's executive officers are entitled to participate in the same employee benefit plans, and on the same terms and conditions, as all other full-time employees.

PMI'sPMI’s 401(k) plan covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer upare allowed to 90%contribute a percentage of their eligible compensation to the 401(k) plan, up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service.  PMI'sService, and PMI may make discretionary matching contributions of a portion of the employees’ eligible wage deferrals, subject to certain limitations and conditions. PMI temporarily suspended its discretionary matching contributions from July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 in an effort to reduce costs and mitigate the operating and financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company. The 401(k) plan are discretionary.discretionary matching contributions were partially reinstated effective January 1, 2021 and fully reinstated effective April 1, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, PMI contributed $2.0 million to the 401(k) plan. The amount of PMI’s matching contributions for each of our NEOs is set forth in footnotes to the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

75


All full-time employees, including PMI'sPMI’s named executive officers, may participate in its health and welfare benefit programs, including medical, dental and vision care coverage, disability insurance and life insurance.
70




Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Currently, PMI does not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of its compensation. Accordingly, PMI does not generally provide perquisites, such as company cars and paid parking spaces, to its executive officers. PMI does reimburse its executive officers for certain relocation expenses, subject to the terms and conditions prescribed by the Compensation Committee. In 2018, PMI reimbursed Ms. Metz for relocation expenses incurred in connection with her employment. The reimbursement amounts paid to Ms. Metz for 2018 is disclosed in the “All Other Compensation” column and accompanying footnotes of the Summary Compensation Table.

In the future, PMI may provide additional perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as where PMI believes it is appropriate to assist an individual executive in the performance of his or her duties and for recruitment, motivation or retention purposes.

Post-Employment Compensation

The Compensation Committee recognizes that a possible, threatened, or pending change of control transaction could result in the departure or distraction of PMI’s senior executives. To establish a meaningful financial incentive for PMI’s senior executive officers to work diligently through and beyond a proposed transaction that may involve a change in control of the company, certain of the stock options and restricted stock units granted to PMI’s NEOs will fully vest upon a change in control of PMI, while others will fully vest in the event that, within 12 months after a change in control of PMI, such officer is subject to a termination of employment without cause within 12 months after a change in control of PMI.

In addition, during 2017 and 2018, PMI entered into severance arrangements with each of Messrs. Kimball, Ashraf and Topakas, and with each of Mses. Hwang and Metz, as part of their offer letters and amendment to offer letter (with respect to Mr. Ashraf). The severance arrangements provide that each of Messrs. Kimball, Ashraf and Topakas, and each of Mses. Hwang and Metz, would be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to six months’ of annual base salary (less applicable deductions and withholdings) in the event that the respective officer’s employment is terminated by PMI without cause or by the applicable executive officerresigns for good reason (each as defined in the applicable option agreement).
In addition, PMI entered into severance and change in control agreements (the “severance agreements”) with each of Messrs. Kimball, and Ashraf in November 2020 and with Mr. Woodhouse in February 2022, the terms and conditions of which restate and replace any severance arrangements set forth in their respective offer letter).letters. Under the severance agreements, each of Messrs. Kimball, Ashraf, and Woodhouse, would be entitled to the following in the event that such officer’s employment is terminated by PMI without “cause” or by the applicable officer for “good reason” (each as defined in the severance agreement) and the officer meets certain tenure requirements as of the date of such termination: (i) a lump sum severance payment equal to one year base salary; (ii) any unpaid annual bonus and long-term cash incentive award for the year(s) preceding the year of termination; (iii) continued coverage for the participants and eligible dependents pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended (“COBRA”), for 12 months, unless such coverage is earlier terminated in accordance with the terms of the severance agreement; (iv) a pro-rated annual bonus payment for the year of termination; and (v) with respect to any long-term performance period under the LTCIP that commenced more than one year prior to the executive’s termination date, a pro-rated long-term cash incentive payment for the performance period in which the termination occurs. Until certain tenure requirements are met, Mr. Woodhouse would only be entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to 6 months base salary in the event that his employment is terminated by PMI without “cause” or by him for “good reason” prior to the one year anniversary of his employment start date and a lump sum severance payment equal to 12 months base salary in the event that his employment is terminated by PMI without “cause” or by him for “good reason” after the one year anniversary of his employment start date. In the event that Messrs. Kimball, Ashraf, or Woodhouse, is terminated by PMI or its successor without cause or by the applicable officer for good reason and such termination occurs within 24 months following a change in control of PMI, then, subject to certain tenure requirements, such officer would be entitled to receive the severance set forth in items (i) through (iii) above, as well as such officer’s (x) target annual bonus for the year of termination; and (y) their target long-term cash incentive payment for the year of termination. Receipt of these severance benefits is conditioned on the officer’s signing a release of claims in favor of PMI.

PMI also entered into a severance agreement with Mr. Topakas in November 2020 which replaced any severance arrangements in Mr. Topakas’s offer letter and contained the same terms and conditions as the severance agreements signed by Messrs. Kimball and Ashraf which are described above. Mr. Topakas departed from his role as Chief Technology Officer of PMI effective March 15, 2021 and as a result, the terms of his severance agreement are no longer applicable.
For additional information regarding these severance and change in control arrangements, see "Potential“Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control.Control of PMI.

Compensation Risk Assessment

PMI's management evaluates and mitigates any risk that may exist relating to its compensation plans, practices and policies for all employees, including PMI's NEOs. PMI's management has concluded that PMI's compensation policies and practices do not create or promote inappropriate or excessive risk taking.
71




Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned during the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 20172021, 2020 and December 31, 20162019 by each of PMI’s named executive officers (in thousands): 
76


Name and Principal PositionYearSalary ($)Bonus ($)Stock Awards ($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)(1)
All Other
Compensation ($)(2)
Totals ($)
David Kimball (3)2018$500 $450 $— $629 $14 $1,593 
Chief Executive Officer and2017500 542 — 2572 14 3,628 
former Chief Financial Officer2016305 383 1,510 3,351 31 5,580 
Usama Ashraf (4)2018401 279 964 185 14 1,843 
Chief Financial Officer2017294 283 — 472 64 1,113 
Nasos Topakas (5)2018358 251 964 — 14 1,587 
Chief Technology Officer2017248 197 — 943 1,396 
Julie Hwang (6)2018285 174 — 315 11 785 
General Counsel and Secretary
Justine Metz (7)2018323 230 — 484 44 1,081 
Executive Vice President,
Marketing
YearSalary ($)Bonus ($)
Option Awards
($) 1
 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)
All Other
Compensation ($) 2
Totals ($)
Name and Principal Position
David Kimball2021$550 550— 731 6131,844
Chief Executive Officer2020498 3427 4220 5— 121,157
2019500 450 — — 14 964
Usama Ashraf2021447 37369 600 6131,502
President and2020409 3268442 5— 14 733
Chief Financial Officer2019428 289 40 — 14771
Pete Woodhouse 7
2021188 141786 — 91,124
Chief Technology Officer
Edward R. Buell III 8
2021323 19126 185 613738
General Counsel, Secretary and2020252 366 45— 10336
Chief Compliance Officer2019260 7831 — 10379
Nasos Topakas 9
202180 — — — 989
Chief Technology Officer2020352 3228432 5— 14 626
2019368 249 — — 14 631
11.The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units and stock options granted to the named executive officers as calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Board’s Topic ASC 718, Compensation –StockCompensation–Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) using a Black-Scholes model to purchase shares of PMI’s common stock.  The key assumptions used in PMI’s ASC 718 calculation are discussed in Note 2 of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
22.“All Other Compensation” consists of compensation received from employer matching contributions to PMI’s 401(k) plan and relocation reimbursement paid by PMI for each named executive officer.plan.  
33.Reflects the temporary reductions in base salaries implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
4.Bonus payouts for 2020 were calculated based on our NEOs’ non-reduced base salaries and do not reflect the temporary reduction in base salaries implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
5.Represents the incremental fair value of options that were granted in prior periods and repriced in connection with the stock option reprice implemented in 2020.
6.The amount reported reflects non-equity incentive compensation earned over 2020 and 2021 under the Long Term Cash Incentive Plan.
7.Mr. KimballWoodhouse joined PMI in March 2016July 2021 as its Chief Financial Officer.  He was appointed PMI's Chief Executive Officer in December 2016.  Mr. Kimball's Total Compensation for 2016 includes relocation expenses of $31,141 and a signing bonus of $125,000.
4Mr. Ashraf joined PMI in February 2017 as its Chief Financial Officer.  Mr. Ashraf's total compensation for 2017 includes relocation expenses of $50,052 and a signing bonus of $20,000.
5Mr. Topakas joined PMI in April 2017 as its Chief Technology Officer.
68.Ms. HwangMr. Buell was promoted to General Counsel and Secretary of PMI in June 2018.  Ms. Hwang's total compensation for 2018 includes a one-time retention bonus of $66,354.March 2021.
79.Ms. Metz's joinedMr. Topakas departed from his role as Chief Technology Officer of PMI in December 2017 as its Executive Vice President, Marketing.  Ms. Metz's total compensation for 2018 includes relocation expenses of $29,900.effective March 15, 2021.
2018
72




2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards (1)(2) 1 , 2
The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to PMI'sthe listed PMI named executive officers during 2018 (dollar2021 (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information):
77


NameGrant Date (2)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(3)
David Kimball3/20/182,535,292 $0.54 $629 
Usama Ashraf3/20/181,784,793 n/a 964 (4)
8/8/18837,719 0.48 185 
Nasos Topakas3/20/181,784,793 n/a 964 (4)
Julie Hwang3/20/18218,550 0.54 55 
8/8/181,184,738 0.48 261 
Justine Metz3/20/181,750,000 0.54 433 
3/20/18204,677 0.54 51 
Grant Date
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options
(#)
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards
($/Sh)
Grant Date Fair Value of
Stock and Option Awards ($) 3
Usama Ashraf3/10/20212,000,000$0.06 $69 
Pete Woodhouse8/10/20215,584,793$0.24 $786 
Edward R. Buell III3/10/2021756,638$0.06 $26 
11.The following columns are intentionally omitted from this table: Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards, and Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards.
22.The equity awards granted to the NEOs in 20182021 were granted under, and governed by the terms of, PMI's 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and the applicable award agreements. See the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 20182021 Fiscal Year-End table below for a description of the vesting schedule of the equity awards granted in 20182021 and reported in the Tabletable above.
33.The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units and stock options granted to the named executive officers as calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Board’s Topic ASC 718, Compensation –StockCompensation–Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) using a Black-Scholes model to purchase shares of PMI’s common stock.  The key assumptions used in PMI’s ASC 718 calculation are discussed in Note 2 of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.
4Represents restricted stock units (“RSUs”).
CEO Pay Ratio

In accordance with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, PMI is providing the following information for the year ended December 31, 2018:

2021:
The median of total compensation of all employees, excluding our CEO: $120,999;$141,761;
The annual total compensation of our CEO: $1,592,868;$1,844,300; and
The ratio of CEO total compensation to median employee total compensation: 1313.01 to 1.

Our CEO pay ratio information is a reasonable good faith estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the SEC pay ratio rules and methods for disclosure. In order to determine the median employee from a compensation perspective, PMI examined cash compensation (salary, wages and cash bonuses) paid infor the 20182021 calendar year for all employees, excluding our CEO, employed as of December 31, 20182021 (the “Determination Date”). On the Determination Date, Prosper’s employee population consisted of 415384 individuals, all of whom were located in the United States. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time, and temporary employees. We did not include any contractors or workers employed through a third-party provider in our employee population.

To identify the “median employee,” we utilized the amount of base salary, wages and cash bonus our employees received, as reflected in our payroll records through the Determination Date and annualized such amounts for any individual hired during 2018.2021. Once we identified our median employee, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 20182021 to determine the median employee total compensation in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K and compared such total compensation to the total compensation of PMI’s CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
7873




Narrative Discussion of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
Offer Letters and Arrangements
David Kimball. In November 2016, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Kimball in connection with his appointment as its Chief Executive Officer. In addition to his initial base salary, Mr. Kimball's offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 100% of his base salary, payable on a quarterly basis; (ii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; and (iii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. PMI also committed to grant Mr. Kimball an equity award of options exercisable into shares of PMI common stock representing up to 5% of PMI’s capitalization on a fully diluted basis, subject to the terms and conditions of the offer letter. In addition, the offer letter included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under "Post-Employment Compensation" above.
Mr. Kimball's November 2016 offer letter replaced the offer letter PMI entered into with Mr. Kimball in March 2016 in connection with his appointment as its Chief Financial Officer. In addition to the severance, reimbursement and benefits arrangements included in the November 2016 offer letter, Mr. Kimball's March 2016 offer letter included his initial base salary and equity grant as CFO and provided for a one-time sign-on bonus of $125,000, subject to certain repayment requirements in the event of Mr. Kimball’s termination from PMI within 12 months of his employment.
In November 2020, PMI and Mr. Kimball executed a severance and change in control agreement that replaced any prior agreements regarding severance set forth in Mr. Kimball’s offer letter. The terms of Mr. Kimball’s severance and change in control agreement are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.
Usama Ashraf. In February 2017, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Ashraf in connection with his appointment as its Chief Financial Officer. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Ashraf's offer letter provided for (i) a one-time sign-on bonus of $20,000, subject to certain repayment requirements in the event of Mr. Ashraf's termination from PMI within 12 months of his employment; (ii) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 50% of his base salary; (iii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; (iv) reimbursement of certain short-term housing expenses and (v) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI.
In July 2018, PMI and Mr. Ashraf executed an amendmentaddition to his offer letter that provides for certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under "Post-Employment Compensation" above.Mr. Ashraf's offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus payment in an amount equal to 25% of his base salary. In August 2018, in connection with Mr. Ashraf's expanded scope of responsibilities in the role of Chief Financial Officer, the Compensation Committee increased his annual performance bonus target from 50% to 60% of his base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Ashraf's annual performance bonus target to 75% of his annual base salary. In March 2020, the Compensation Committee confirmed Mr. Ashraf's annual performance bonus target for 2020 would remain at 75% of his annual base salary. On February 24, 2021, Mr. Ashraf was appointed as President of PMI effective March 1, 2021. In connection with his appointment, Mr. Ashraf: (i) will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 85% of his base salary; and (ii) was granted an option to purchase 2,000,000 shares of PMI's common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. The option will vest over a four year period, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the stock option agreement.
In November 2020, PMI and Mr. Ashraf executed a severance and change in control agreement that replaced any prior agreements regarding severance set forth in Mr. Ashraf’s offer letter. The terms of Mr. Ashraf’s severance and change in control agreement are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.
Pete Woodhouse. In May 2021, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Woodhouse in connection with his appointment as its Chief Technology Officer. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Woodhouse’s offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 75% of his base salary; (ii) eligibility to participate in PMI’s Long Term Cash Incentive Plan, subject to the tenure and other requirements set forth therein; and (iii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. In February 2022, PMI and Mr. Woodhouse executed a severance and change in control agreement that replaces any prior agreements regarding severance set forth in Mr. Woodhouse’s offer letter. The terms of Mr. Ashraf's amendedWoodhouse’s severance and change in control agreement are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.
Edward R. Buell III. In September 2015, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Buell in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approvedconnection with his appointment as Compliance Counsel. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Buell’s offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a one-time retention bonus payment in antarget amount equal to 25%of 20% of his base salary.salary; and (ii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. In June 2018, Mr. Buell was promoted to Chief Compliance Officer and Deputy General Counsel. In connection with this promotion, Mr. Buell’s annual performance bonus target was increased to 30% of his annual base salary and Mr. Buell was granted an option to purchase 149,700 shares of PMI's common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. In March 2021, Mr. Buell was appointed as General Counsel and Secretary of PMI. In connection with this appointment, Mr. Buell: (i) will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 65% of his base salary; and (ii) was granted options to
74




purchase 756,638 shares of PMI's common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date.
Nasos Topakas. In April 2017, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Topakas in connection with his appointment as its Chief Technology Officer. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Topakas's offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 75% of his base salary in his first year of employment and 50% of his base salary in subsequent years; and (ii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. The offer letter also included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under "Post-Employment Compensation" above.
In addition to the terms of Mr. Topakas' amendedTopakas’ offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus payment in an amount equal to 25% of his base salary.
Julie Hwang. In June 2018, PMI entered into an offer letter with Ms. Hwang in connection with her appointment as its General Counsel and Secretary. In addition to her initial base salary and equity grant, Ms. Hwang's offer letter provided for (i) a one-time retention bonus of $66,354, payable duringMarch 2019, the first quarter of March 2019; (ii) eligibility to receive anCompensation Committee increased Mr. Topakas’s annual performance bonus in a target amountto 75% of 40% of herhis annual base salary;salary. In March 2020, the Compensation Committee confirmed Mr. Topakas’s annual performance bonus target for 2020 would remain at 75% of his annual base salary.
In November 2020, PMI and (iii) eligibility to participateMr. Topakas executed a severance and change in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. In addition, thecontrol agreement that replaced any prior agreements regarding severance set forth in Mr. Topakas’s offer letter included certain severance arrangements, theletter. The terms of whichMr. Topakas’s severance and change in control agreement are described under "Post-Employment Compensation"“Post-Employment Compensation” above.
In addition to the terms Mr. Topakas departed from his role as Chief Technology Officer of Ms. Hwang's offer letter (including the one-time retention bonus set forth therein), in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus in an amount equal to 35% of her base salary.
Justine Metz. In November 2017, PMI, entered into an offer letter with Ms. Metz in connection with her appointment as its Executive Vice President, Marketing. In addition to her initial base salary and equity grant, Ms. Metz's offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 75% of her annual base salary for calendar year
79


2018 and 40% of her annual base salary in subsequent years; (ii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; and (iii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. In addition, the offer letter included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under "Post-Employment Compensation" above.
In addition to the terms of Ms. Metz's offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus in an amount equal to 35% of her base salary.effective March 15, 2021.
Equity Incentive Plans    
PMI grants equity awards primarily through its Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was approved as amended and restated by its stockholders on December 1, 2010; and its 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by PMI's Board of Directors on April 7, 2015 and subsequently amended by an Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2, and Amendment No. 3, which were approved by PMI's Board of Directors on February 15, 2016, May 19, 2016, and January 23, 2018, respectively (as amended, the "2015 Plan"“2015 Plan”). PMI also previously granted equity awards through its Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was approved as amended and restated by its stockholders on December 1, 2010, and expired in March 2015. The 2005 Plan and 2015 Plan are collectively referred to in this Annual Report as the "Equity“Equity Plans.
In March 2015, the 2005 Plan expired, except that anyAny awards granted under the 2005 Plan prior to its expiration remain in effect pursuant to their terms. Unless sooner terminated by PMI’s Board of Directors, the 2015 Plan will expire ten years from the date of its adoption. All stock options granted to NEOs are incentive stock options, to the extent permissible under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. All equity awards to PMI’s employees and directors were granted at no less than the fair market value of its common stock on the date of each award. In the absence of a public trading market for PMI common stock, PMI’s Board of Directors, acting on its own or through the Compensation Committee, has determined the fair market value of its common stock in good faith based upon consideration of a number of relevant factors including the status of its development efforts, financial status and market conditions. See Item 15, "Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements."
The 2005 Plan provided for grants in the form of non-qualified stock options and stock purchase rights, which were available for grant to PMI’s directors, consultants or employees, including officers, and incentive stock options, which were available for grant solely to its employees, including officers. The 2015 Plan provides for grants in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and unrestricted stock. Under the 2015 Plan, incentive stock options may be granted solely to PMI’s employees, including officers. Awards other than incentive stock options may be granted to its directors, consultants or employees, including officers. The Equity Plans are administered by PMI’s Board of Directors, which in turn has delegated authority to administer the plans to the Compensation Committee.
Shares of PMI’s common stock subject to options that have expired or otherwise terminate under the 2015 Plan or the 2005 Plan without having been exercised in full will become available for grant under the 2015 Plan. Shares of PMI’s common stock issued under the 2015 Plan may include previously unissued shares or reacquired shares bought on the market or otherwise.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, an aggregate of 94,271,65796,855,913 options to purchase our common stock were outstanding or authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan.Equity Plans. Of suchthese outstanding and authorized options, as of December 31, 2018, a total of 69,180,12972,186,151 options and 2,636,343 restricted stock units were outstanding under the 2015 PlanEquity Plans and 25,091,528 options22,033,419 equity awards were available for grant including 39,764,363 shares that were forfeited under the 2015 Plan. As of December 31, 2018, 30,093,909 options under the 2015 Plan were vested and outstanding and 245,521 have been exercised. As of December 31, 2018, there were zero stock optionsNo equity awards are available for grant under the 2005 Plan. As of December 31, 2021, an aggregate of 86,235,520 options granted under the 2015 Plan were forfeited. As of December 31, 2021, 48,561,623 options under the Equity Plans were vested and outstanding and 49,887,709 were exercised.

The NEOs identified herein have been granted equity awards upon employment with PMI, for merit increases, and for retention purposes.
75




Outstanding Equity Awards at 20182021 Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth certain information regarding outstanding equity awards granted to PMI’s named executive officers ("NEOs"(“NEOs”) that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2018.  2021:
80


NameGrant DateVesting Commencement DateNumber of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (1)Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) UnexercisableOption Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration DateNumber of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (1)
Grant DateVesting Commencement DateNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) ExercisableNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) UnexercisableOption Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration Date
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) 1
David KimballDavid Kimball5/3/2016(2)3/18/2016970,010 440,915 0.22 5/3/2026David Kimball5/3/201623/18/20161,410,925 — 0.025/3/2026
5/3/2016(3)3/18/2016— — — — 705,465 5/3/201633/18/2016705,465 
6/17/2016(4)4/28/20161,880,625 235,078 0.22 6/17/2026— 6/17/201644/28/20162,115,703 — 0.026/17/2026
3/17/2017(5)12/1/201615,867,434 5,289,145 0.22 3/17/2027— 3/17/2017512/1/201621,156,579 — 0.023/17/2027
3/20/2018(2)3/1/2018— 2,535,292 0.54 3/20/2028— 3/20/201823/1/20182,376,836 158,456 0.023/20/2028
Usama AshrafUsama Ashraf3/17/2017(6)2/27/20171,557,069 1,840,173 0.22 3/17/2027— Usama Ashraf3/17/201792/27/20173,397,242 — 0.023/17/2027
11/7/2017(6)2/27/2017184,597 218,161 0.53 11/7/2027—  11/7/201792/27/2017402,758 — 0.0211/7/2027
3/20/2018(7)3/1/2018— — — — 1,784,793 3/20/201863/1/20181,784,793 
8/8/2018(6)7/1/2018— 837,719 0.48 8/8/2028— 8/8/201897/1/2018715,551 122,168 0.028/8/2028
Nasos Topakas 11/7/2017(6)4/17/20171,583,333 2,216,667 0.53 11/7/2027— 
3/20/2018(7)3/1/2018— — — — 1,784,793 11/5/2019911/5/2019260,416 239,584 0.0211/5/2029
Julie Hwang 11/4/2015(8)8/31/2015125,000 25,000 0.22 11/4/2025— 
3/10/202193/1/2021— 2,000,000 0.063/10/2031
Pete WoodhousePete Woodhouse8/10/202197/1/2021— 5,584,793 0.248/10/2031
Edward R. BuellEdward R. Buell11/4/201579/28/201575,000 — 0.0211/4/2025
5/3/2016(9)4/28/201653,911 6,739 0.22 5/3/2026— 6/17/201684/28/201630,325 — 0.026/17/2026
3/17/2017(8)1/1/201729,468 32,032 0.22 3/17/2027— 3/17/201771/1/201737,800 — 0.023/17/2027
3/20/2018(8)3/1/2018— 218,550 0.54 3/20/2028— 3/17/201781/1/201730,250 — 0.023/17/2027
8/8/2018(6)6/1/2018— 1,184,738 0.48 8/8/2028— 3/20/201873/1/2018107,695 7,180 0.023/20/2028
Justine Metz3/20/2018(6)12/31/2017437,500 1,312,500 0.54 3/20/2028— 
3/20/2018(6)3/1/2018— 204,677 0.54 3/20/2028— 3/20/201873/1/2018117,187 7,813 0.023/20/2028
8/8/201876/1/2018130,987 18,713 0.028/8/2028
5/7/201973/1/201938,396 17,454 0.025/7/2029
11/5/2019711/5/2019156,250 143,750 0.0211/5/2029
3/10/202193/15/2021— 756,638 0.063/10/2031
Nasos TopakasNasos Topakas
11.Represents restricted stock units (“RSUs”), in each case that remained unvested as of December 31, 2018.2021.
22.This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable vesting commencement date set forth in the table above (the "Vesting“Vesting Commencement Date"Date”) and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years, provided that, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of a change in control of PMI, a sale of all or substantially all of PMI's assets, or a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of PMI (each, a "Corporate Transaction"“Corporate Transaction”).
33.These RSUs initially vest, if at all, when PMI files for an initial public offering and the lock-up period expires or there is a Corporate Transaction (which, as defined in the RSU grant notice, does not include a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of PMI), whichever occurs first (each, a “Triggering Event”). The RSUs will immediately and fully vest in connection with the occurrence of such Triggering Event.
44.This option vests over three years, with 1/36 vesting on the one month anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/36 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years, provided that, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of a Corporate Transaction.
55.This option vests over three years, with 1/2 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years, provided that, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of the Corporate Transaction.
6This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years, except that, in the event the NEO is terminated without cause within 12 months of a Corporate Transaction, any unvested options will vest in full immediately.
8176



7
6.These RSUs initially vest, if at all, upon the occurrence of a Triggering Event. The number of RSUs that vest upon a Triggering Event will be equal to the number of RSUs that would have vested had the RSUs been subject to the four-year Time-Based Vesting Schedule (1/4 vesting on first-year anniversary of applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting monthly thereafter). If the NEO provides continuous service through the Triggering Event, the remaining RSUs will vest pursuant to the Time-Based Vesting Schedule until the RSUs are fully vested.
87.This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years.
98.This option vests over three years, with 1/36 vesting on the one month anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/36 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years.
9.This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years, except that, in the event the NEO is terminated without cause, or if Optionee resigns for Good Reason, in each case within 12 months of a Corporate Transaction, any unvested options will vest in full immediately.
The following table sets forth information regarding equity awards held by PMI's named executive officers that were exercised, vested or settled during 20182021 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Option AwardsStock Awards
Name 
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting/Settlement
($)
David Kimball
Usama Ashraf
Pete Woodhouse
Edward R. Buell III
Nasos Topakas— 
Julie Hwang— — — 
Justine Metz— — — — 

82


Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change In Control of PMI
The following table provides the estimated value of the payments that PMI would provide to its named executive officers in connection with a change in control of PMI and/or a termination of employment.employment, including any options, RSUs and Stock Awards accelerated as a result of the change in control and/or termination. In determining amounts payable, we have assumed in all cases that the change in control or termination of employment, as applicable, occurred on December 31, 2018. 2021.
77




With respect to a termination of employment, we have assumed in all cases that the termination was without cause.
NameCash Severance ($)Number of Unvested Options (#)Estimated Value of Unvested Options at December 31, 2018 ($)Number of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards (#)Estimated Value of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards at December 31, 2018 ($)Total Estimated Value ($)
(dollar amounts in thousands)
David Kimball
Involuntary Termination$250 — — — $— $250 
Change in Control— 8,500,430 $298 705,465 191 489 
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control— — — — — — 
Usama Ashraf
Involuntary Termination210 — — — — 210 
Change in Control— — — — — — 
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control— 2,896,053 92 1,784,793 482 574 
Nasos Topakas
Involuntary Termination180 — — — — 180 
Change in Control— — — — — — 
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control— 2,216,667 — 1,784,793 482 482 
Julie Hwang
Involuntary Termination 163 — — — — 163 
Change in Control— — — — — — 
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control— 1,184,738 — — — — 
Justine Metz
Involuntary Termination163 — — — — 163 
Change in Control— — — — — — 
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control— 1,517,177 — — — — 
NameCash Severance ($)Number of Unvested Options (#)Estimated Value of Unvested Options at December 31, 2021 ($)Number of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards (#)Estimated Value of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards at December 31, 2021 ($)Total Estimated Value ($)
(dollar amounts in thousands)
David Kimball
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason$1,831 — — — — $1,831 
Change in Control— 158,456 109 705,465 501 610 
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control1,831 — — — — 1,831 
Usama Ashraf
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason1,427 — — — — 1,427 
Change in Control— — — 1,710,427 1,214 1,214 
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control1,427 2,361,752 1,550 — — 2,977 
Pete Woodhouse
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason188 — — — — 188 
Change in Control— — — — — — 
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control375 5,584,793 2,625 — — 3,000 
Edward R. Buell III
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason— — — — — — 
Change in Control— — — — — — 
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control185 756,638 492 — — 677 
Nasos Topakas
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason— — — — — — 
Change in Control— — — — — — 
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control— — — — — — 
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, Christopher M. Bishko (who resigned from PMI's Board of Directors on February 22, 2018), Mason Haupt,2021, Claire A. Huang (who, along with Mr. Haupt, was appointed to the Compensation Committee effective as of March 9, 2018) and Patrick W. GradyThomas R. Kearney served as members of the Compensation Committee. None of these directors is or has been an officer or employee of PMI at any time or had any relationship with PMI requiring disclosure by PMI under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, none of PMI's executive officers served as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee (or other board committee serving an equivalent function) of any unrelated entity that had one or more of its executive officers serving on PMI’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee (or other board committee serving an equivalent function).
8378




Director Compensation
The following table shows compensation for the year ended December 31, 20182021 to PMI’s directors who were not also named executive officers at the time they received compensation as directors (in thousands):
Name
Fees
earned or
paid in
cash ($)
Equity
awards ($)
Total
Patrick W. Grady— — — 
Rajeev V. Date$75 — $75 
Christopher M. Bishko (1)— — — 
David R. Golob— — — 
Nigel W. Morris$75 — $75 
Mason Haupt— — — 
Claire A. Huang$75 — $75 
Fees
earned or
paid in
cash ($)
Equity
awards ($)
Total
Claire A. Huang$75 $75 
Thomas R. Kearney (1)$75 $75 
Peter J. deSilva (2)$56 220 $276 
Rajeev V. Date (3)$18.8 $18.8 
11.Mr. BishkoKearney held 604,167unvested stock options at December 31, 2021.
2.Mr. deSilva was appointed as a director of PMI effective April 1, 2021. Mr. deSilva held 1,000,000 unvested stock options at December 31, 2021.
3.Mr. Date resigned as a Directordirector of PMI effective February 22, 2018.March 26, 2021.

From time to time, PMI reimburses certain of its non-employee directors for travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending board of directors meetings.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTCompensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee of PMI has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to PMI's Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Patrick W. Grady, Chair
Mason D. Haupt
Claire A. Huang, Chairwoman

Thomas R. Kearney
ItemITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of PMI’s common stockCommon Stock as of March 1, 2019,2022, by:
each of PMI’s directors;
each of PMI’s named executive officers;
each person, or group of affiliated persons, who is known by PMI to beneficially own more than 5% of PMI’s common stock;Common Stock; and
all of PMI’s directors and executive officers as a group.
84


Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table below, all of the shares reflected in the table are shares of common stockCommon Stock and all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.
Percentage ownership calculations are based on 260,368,319273,024,515 shares of common stockCommon Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2019,2022, assuming the conversion of all of PMI’s convertible preferred stock, but excluding any outstanding stock options or warrants. Each share of PMI preferred stock is convertible at any time at the discretion of the holder. Shares of PMI’s Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock, Series D Preferred Stock, Series E Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred Stock andconvert into shares of PMI Common Stock at a ratio of 1 to 1. Shares of PMI’s Series A-1 Preferred
79




Stock convert into shares of PMI Common Stock at a ratio of 1,000,000 to 1. Shares of PMI’s Series G Preferred Stock convert into shares of PMI common stock at a ratio of 1 to 1. Shares of PMI’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock convert into shares of PMI common stock at a ratio of 1,000,000 to 1.1.36.

In computing the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock beneficially owned by a person or entity and the percentage ownership of that person or entity, PMI deemed outstanding all shares of common stockCommon Stock subject to options and warrants held by that person or entity that are currently exercisable or vesting within 60 days of March 1, 2019.2022. PMI did not deem these shares outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1.0% is denoted with an asterisk (*). Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table below, addresses of named beneficial owners and officers are in care of Prosper Marketplace, Inc., 221 Main Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105.
Name of Beneficial Owner
Number of
Shares Owned (1)
Number of Shares Underlying Options, and Warrants Exercisable Currently or Within 60 Days (2)Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (3)
Beneficial
Ownership
Percentage
Directors and Executive Officers
Rajeev V. Date (4)26,115 924,846 950,961  
Patrick W. Grady (5)51,247,915 — 51,247,915 19.68 %
Nigel W. Morris  (6)1,073,970 1,080,349 2,154,319  
Claire A. Huang— 333,333 333,333  
Mason D. Haupt (7)— 137,033 137,033  
David R. Golob (8)17,413,325 35,544,141 52,957,466 17.90 %
David Kimball— 22,601,691 22,601,691 7.99 %
Usama Ashraf— 2,058,332 2,058,332  
Nasos Topakas— 1,900,000 1,900,000  
Julie Hwang— 370,865 370,865  
Justine Metz— 643,030 643,030  
All directors and executive officers as a group (9)69,761,325 65,593,620 135,354,945 41.52 %
5% Shareholders
Francisco Partners (10)17,413,325 35,544,141 52,957,466 17.90 %
Sequoia Capital (11)51,247,915 — 51,247,915 19.68 %
LPG Capital GP Limited (12)37,249,498 — 37,249,498 14.31 %
PF WarrantCo (13)723,902 139,701,850 140,425,752 35.10 %
Accel Partners (14)24,320,667 — 24,320,667 9.34 %
IDG Capital Partners (15)24,320,667 — 24,320,667 9.34 %
Number of
Shares Owned1
Number of Shares Underlying Options, and Warrants Exercisable Currently or Within 60 Days2
Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned3
Beneficial
Ownership
Percentage
Directors and Executive Officers
Thomas R. Kearney— 479,166 479,166 *
Claire A. Huang— 1,000,000 1,000,000 *
Peter J. deSilva270,833 270,833 *
David Kimball— 27,218,499 27,218,499 9.07 %
Usama Ashraf— 5,488,230 5,488,230 1.97 %
Pete Woodhouse— — — — 
Edward R. Buell III— 990,217 990,217 *
Ashish Agarwal— — — — 
Nasos Topakas— — — — 
All directors and executive officers as a group4
— 35,446,945 35,446,945 11.49 %
5% Shareholders
Francisco Partners5
17,413,325 35,544,141 52,957,466 17.16 %
Newport Trust Company6
51,247,915 — 51,247,915 18.77 %
LPG Capital GP Limited7
50,776,886 — 50,776,886 18.60 %
Soros Fund Management LLC8
723,902 51,614,124 52,338,026 16.12 %
Accel Partners9
24,320,667 — 24,320,667 8.91 %
IDG Capital Partners10
24,320,667 — 24,320,667 8.91 %
JPF LLC11
— 41,833,904 41,833,904 13.29 %
New Residential Investment Corp.12
41,833,904 41,833,905 13.29 %
Third Point Ventures LLC13
— 41,833,904 41,833,904 13.29 %
* Less than 1%
11.Includes shares of common stockCommon Stock (including common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock) owned directly or indirectly, but does not include shares subject to options and warrants.
22.Includes shares subject to options or warrants owned directly or indirectly that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2019.2022.
85


33.The amounts and percentages of common stockCommon Stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the Commission, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities for which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
44.Consists of 924,84635,446,945 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and 26,115 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Mr. Date or his affiliate.  options.
55.Consists of 51,947,915 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Sequoia Capital through certain of its affiliates. Mr. Grady is a partner of Sequoia Capital and therefore may be deemed to share voting and investment power over these shares. Mr. Grady disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
6Consists of 1,005,935 shares of common stock, 68,035 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and 1,080,349 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by QED Investors through certain of its affiliates.  Mr. Morris is a partner of QED Investors and therefore may be deemed to share voting and investment power over these shares. Mr. Morris disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
7Consists of 137,033 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants held by Mr. Haupt.
8Consists of Represents 17,413,325 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and 35,544,141 share of common stock issuable upon exercise and conversion of preferred stock warrants held by Francisco Partners through certain of its affiliates. Mr. Golob is a partner of Sequoia Capital and therefore may be deemed to share voting and investment power over these shares. Mr. Golob disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein
9Consists of 1,005,935, shares of common stock, 68,687,355 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock, 28,832,097 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options, 1,080,349 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants and 35,681,174 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants.
10Represents 17,413,325 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Francisco Partners through certain of its affiliates and 35,544,141 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by Francisco Partners through certain of its affiliates. Francisco Partners
80




is deemed to have voting and investment power over these shares. The address for Francisco Partners is One Letterman Drive, Building C – Suite 140410, San Francisco, CA 94129
116.Represents 51,247,915 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Sequoia Capital through certainProsper Grantor Trust. Prosper Grantor Trust is a wholly-owned subsidiary of its affiliates. Sequoia CapitalProsper Marketplace, Inc. and as such, Prosper Marketplace Inc. holds sole voting power over such shares. Newport Trust Company, as trustee for Prosper Grantor Trust, is deemed to have voting and investment power over thebe an indirect beneficial owner of such shares. The address for Sequoia CapitalNewport Trust Company is 3000 Sand Hill Road, 4-250, Menlo Park, California 94025.45 South 7th Street, Suite 2208, Minneapolis, MN 55402.
127.Represents 37,249,49850,776,886 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by LPG Capital through certain of its affiliates. LPG Capital l is deemed to have voting and investment power over the shares. The address for LPG Capital is 199-203 Hennessy Road, Flat 1002, Hong Kong, China.
86


138.Consists of (i) 2 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and 130,888,54251,370,586 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants, in each case, held by PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “PF WarrantCo Shares”); (ii) 8,569,770 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants held by QPL Holdings (PF) LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “QPL Shares”); (iii)(ii) 243,538 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants held by QPB Holdings Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “QPB Shares”); and (iv)(iii) 723,900 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Quantum Strategic Partners Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Quantum Strategic Shares”). 
QPL Holdings (PF) GP Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company, is the general partner of PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP.   Soros Fund Management LLC (“SFM LLC”) serves as principal investment manager to QPL Holdings (PF) GP Ltd.,for QPL Holdings (PF) LP, QPB Holdings Ltd., and Quantum Strategic Partners Ltd. As such, SFM LLC is deemed to have sole voting and dispositive powerhas been granted investment discretion over the QPL Shares, the QPB Shares and the Quantum Strategic Shares, and shared voting and dispositive power over the PF WarrantCo Shares. SFM LLC disclaims beneficial ownership of the PF WarrantCo Shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. George Soros serves as Chairman and Manager of SFM LLC and Robert Soros serves ashas sole discretion to replace FPR Manager LLC, the Manager of SFM LLC. The business address of SFM LLC is 250 West 55th Street, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10019. The registered address for QPL Holdings (PF) GP Ltd. is c/o Walkers Corporate Limited, Cayman Corporate Centre, 27 Hospital Road, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-9008, Cayman Islands.
149.Represents 5,703,470 shares of common stockCommon Stock and 7,245,859 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Accel Partners through certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Accel Shares”); 3,498,765 shares of common stockCommon Stock and 4,722,733 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by IDG Capital Partners through certain of its affiliates (the “IDG Shares”); and 877,185 shares of common stockCommon Stock and 2,272,655 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Breyer Capital, LLC and James W. Breyer 2005 Trust dated 2/25/2005 (collectively, the “Breyer Shares”). Accel Partners is deemed to have voting and investment power over the Accel Shares. Accel Partners is an affiliate of IDG Capital Partners and may also therefore be deemed to share voting and investment power over the IDG Shares. Mr. Breyer is a partner of Accel Partners and thereforetherefore Accel Partners may also be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Breyer Shares. Accel Partners disclaims beneficial ownership of the IDG Shares and Breyer Shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The address of Accel Partners is 428 University Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94301.
1510.Represents 3,498,765 shares of common stockCommon Stock and 4,722,733 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by IDG Capital Partners through certain of its affiliates (“IDG Shares”); 5,703,470 shares of common stock and 7,245,859 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred held by Accel Partners through certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Accel Shares”); and 877,185 shares of common stockCommon Stock and 2,272,655 shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Breyer Capital, LLC and James W. Breyer 2005 Trust dated 2/25/2005 (collectively, the “Breyer Shares”). IDG Capital Partners is deemed to have voting and investment power over the IDG Shares. IDG Capital Partners is an affiliate of Accel Partners and may also therefore be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Accel Shares. Mr. Breyer is a partner of Accel Partners, which is an affiliate of IDG Capital Partners, and therefore IDG Capital Partners may also be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Breyer Shares. IDG Capital Partners disclaims beneficial ownership of the Accel Shares and Breyer Shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The address for IDG Capital Partners is 99 Queen’s Road Central, Unit 1509, The Center, Hong Kong, China.
11.Represents 41,833,904 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by JPF LLC. JPF LLC has shared voting power and shared investment power with its parent, Jefferies Funding LLC, Jefferies Funding LLC’s parent, Jefferies Group LLC, and Jefferies Group LLC’s parent, Jefferies Financial Group Inc. The address for JPF LLC is 520 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022.
12.Consists of (i) 1 share of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock, held directly by New Residential Investment Corp.; and (ii) 41,833,904 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by NRZ PRO Warrant LLC (the “NRZ Shares”). NRZ Pro Warrant LLC is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of New Residential Investment Corp. New Residential Investment Corp. is deemed to have voting and investment power over the NRZ Shares. The address for New Residential Investment Corp. is 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 45th Floor, New York, NY 10105.
81




13.Represents 41,833,904 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by Third Point Ventures LLC. Third Point LLC, as investment manager of Third Point Ventures LLC, has voting power over such shares. The address for Third Point Ventures LLC is 55 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2018,2021, with respect to shares of PMI common stockCommon Stock that may be issued under PMI’s existing equity compensation plans.
87


Plan Category 
Number of
shares of
common
stock to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants, RSUs
and rights (1)
Weighted
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
Number of
shares of
common
stock
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders: 
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated6,459,705 0.15 — 
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended69,180,129 0.39 25,091,528 
All stockholder approved plans 75,639,834 0.37 25,091,528 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders: 
Outstanding Common Stock Warrants1,080,349 0.22 — 
All non-stockholder approved plans 1,080,349 0.22 — 
Total 76,720,183 0.36 25,091,528 
Number of
shares of
common
stock to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants, RSUs
and rights1
Weighted
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
Number of
shares of
common
stock
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated1,337,790 $0.02 — 
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended73,484,704 0.07 22,033,419 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders:
Outstanding common stock warrants1,080,349 0.22 — 
Total potential shares75,902,843 $0.07 22,033,419 
11.Includes option and RSU issuances to employees, directors and certain consultants, advisors or vendors; however, it does not include warrants granted to outside individuals, consultants, advisors and vendors.
Prosper Funding LLC
PMI is the sole member of, and holds a 100% equity interest in, PFL. PFL does not have any equity compensation plans.

Item
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Agreements with PFL
On January 22, 2013, PMI entered into an Administration Agreement with PFL (as amended to date, the “PMI Administration Agreement”), pursuant to which PMI agreed to provide certain administrative services relating to the marketplace. Under the PMI Administration Agreement, PFL is required to pay PMI (a) an amount equal to one-twelfth (1/12) of the specified annual Corporate Administration Fees equal to 50% of finance and legal personnel costs, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan originated through the marketplace, (c) 90% of all servicing feesServicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) all nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of PFL. As of the most recent amendment of the PMI Administration Agreement, PFL is required to pay PMI (a) an Corporate Administration Fees of $500 thousand per month, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan originated through the marketplace, (c) 62.5% of all servicing feesServicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) all nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding.
Also on January 22, 2013, PFL and PMI entered into an Asset Transfer Agreement (the “Asset Transfer Agreement”) pursuant to which PMI, effective February 1, 2013 (i) transferred the marketplace and substantially all of PMI’s assets and rights related to the operation of the marketplace to PFL, and (ii) made a capital contribution to PFL in excess of $3 million. Under the Asset Transfer Agreement, PMI also transferred substantially all of its remaining assets to PFL, including (i) all outstanding Notes issued by PMI under the Indenture dated June 15, 2009 between PMI and Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee (“the (the
82




Indenture”), (ii) all Borrower Loans corresponding to such Notes, (iii) all registration agreements related to such Notes and Borrower Loans, and (iv) all documents and information related to the foregoing. Certain hardware and agreements relevant to the development, maintenance and use of the marketplace, including in relation to the origination, funding and servicing of Borrower Loans, and the issuance, funding and payment of the Notes, were not transferred or assigned to PFL by PMI. In addition, PMI did not transfer to PFL (i) agreements with PMI’s directors, officers or employees and PMI’s financial, legal or
88


other advisors or consultants, (ii) certain agreements with vendors to provide PMI with goods or services in the ordinary course of business (including software licensed pursuant to any “shrink wrap” or “click wrap” license), and (iii) certain cash and short-term investments.
In the Asset Transfer Agreement, PMI agreed, among other things, to:
ii.fund any repurchase obligation with respect to the transferred Notes, and indemnify PFL for any other losses that arise out of any registration agreement related to the transferred Notes or Borrower Loans, including as a result of a breach by PMI of any of its representations or warranties made therein;
iiii.fund any arbitration filing or administrative fees or arbitrator fees payable under any registration agreement related to the transferred Notes or Borrower Loans; and
iiiiii.fund any indemnification obligations that arise under any registration agreement entered into by PMI prior to the date of the asset transfer.
On August 17, 2021, PMI and PFL entered into an Asset Transfer and License Agreement (the “IP Asset Transfer and License Agreement”). The IP Asset Transfer and License Agreement, among other things, (i) transfers, assigns, and conveys certain intellectual property assets related to PMI’s white label service and PMI’s Credit Card product from PMI to PFL, and (ii) grants certain licenses and sublicenses related to the transferred intellectual property assets from PFL to PMI. PMI also agreed to make certain intellectual property filings to provide third parties with notice of the conveyance and to assist PFL with any additional intellectual property filings as may be required. PMI received a one-time fee of $10 from PFL in connection with the foregoing.

The foregoing description of the IP Asset Transfer and License Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the IP Asset Transfer and License Agreement, which is filed as an exhibit hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.
Holders of the transferred Notes are third party beneficiaries under the Asset Transfer Agreement and the Administration Agreement.
Under Section 4.1 of the Indenture, PMI could transfer substantially all of its assets to any person without the consent of the holders of the existing Notes, provided that the transferee expressly assumed all of PMI’s obligations under the Indenture and the existing Notes. In that case, the transferee would succeed to and be substituted for PMI, and PMI would be discharged from all of its obligations and covenants, under the Indenture and the existing Notes. Accordingly, on January 22, 2013, PMI, PFL and Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee entered an Amended and Restated Indenture (the “Amended and Restated Indenture”), effective February 1, 2013, which (i) effected such assumption, substitution and discharge (the “Note Assumption”), and (ii) amended and restated the Indenture to reflect the Note Assumption and to make certain other amendments to the Indenture as permitted therein. Following the Note Assumption, PFL became the obligor with respect to the transferred Notes and the Amended and Restated Indenture, and PMI no longer has any obligations with respect thereto.
Agreements with Prosper Asset Holdings LLC
On November 22, 2013, PMI entered into an Administration Agreement with Prosper Asset Holdings LLC ("PAH"), a wholly owned subsidiary of PFL (the "PAH Administration Agreement"), pursuant to which PMI agreed to provide PAH certain administrative services related to PAH’s operations. Under the PAH Administration Agreement, PAH was required to pay PMI an annual fee in the amount of $150,000.
Also on November 22, 2013, PMI and PAH entered into a Loan Servicing Agreement, pursuant to which PMI agreed to service certain Borrower Loans acquired by PAH under a Loan Sale Agreement entered into on the same date between PAH and PFL. In exchange for servicing these Borrower Loans, PAH agreed to pay PMI the servicing fee identified in the loan listing for each loan purchased by PAH.
On November 28, 2018, the sole member and board of directors of PAH executed a written consent approving the termination of PAH's LLC Agreement and dissolution and winding up of PAH. In connection with PAH's dissolution, the sole member and board of directors of PAH further approved the termination of the PAH Administration Agreement, the Loan Servicing Agreement, and the Loan Sale Agreement. PAH was dissolved on November 29, 2018.
Agreements with Significant Shareholders
On February 27, 2017, PFLPFL entered into a Loan Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with PF LoanCo Funding LLC, a Cayman limited liability company (the “Beneficiary”), and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as trustee of PF LoanCo Trust, a New York common law trust (the “Trust”). The Purchase Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which PFL will sell eligible consumerpersonal loans in an aggregate amount of up to $5.0 billion to the Purchaser for the benefit of the Beneficiary. As of December 31, 2018,2019, an aggregate of $3.1$3.3 billion of loans were purchased under the Purchase Agreement, which does not include $0.3 billion of Whole Loan purchases by members of the Consortium prior to the signing of the Purchase Agreement.
89


The Consortium Purchase Agreement ended in May 2019.
In connection with the Purchase Agreement, on February 27, 2017, PMI entered into a Warrant Agreement with PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP (“PF WarrantCo”), a Delaware limited partnership and an entity related to the Beneficiary, (the “PF WarrantCo”), and, for certain limited purposes, New Residential Investment Corp. (the “Warrant“Series F Warrant Agreement”). Pursuant to the Series F Warrant Agreement, PMI issued to PF WarrantCo three warrant certificates to purchase up to in aggregate 177,720,706 shares of PMI’s Series F Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “Warrant Shares”).
83




During the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement, PF WarrantCo becamewas a beneficial owner of more than 5% of PMI’s common stock in connection with the vesting of portionsCommon Stock as a result of the Warrant Shares.Shares vesting. The Beneficiary is an affiliate under common control with PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP.WarrantCo.
For more information regarding these transactions, please see Note 1615, Consortium Purchase Agreement, of Prosper's Notes to our consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain Relationships Among Directors and Officers
None.
Participation in the Marketplace
PMI’s executive officers, directors and certain affiliates, have opened investor accounts on the marketplace and have made deposits to and withdrawals from their accounts, and invested in portions of borrowers’ loan requests from time to time in the past via purchases of Notes, and may do so in the future. The Notes and Borrower Loans were obtained on terms and conditions that were not more favorable than those obtained by other investors.
Financing Arrangements with Significant Shareholders, Directors and Officers
For further information regarding stock ownership for executive officers, directors and security holders owning greater than 5% ownership of all PMI classes of voting securities please see Item 12, "Security“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Prosper Marketplace, Inc."
Under the terms of the amended and restated voting agreement, dated April 7, 2015, certain investors in PMI’s convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, have each agreed, subject to maintaining certain ownership levels, to exercise their voting rights so as to elect one designee of Francisco Partners III, L.P., one designee of SC Prosper Holdings LLC, one designee of QPL Holdings (PF) LP, one designee of the Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock holders, PMI’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), one common director designated by the CEO, and two independent directors.
Under the terms of the amended and restated investor rights agreement, dated February 27, 2017, the holders of a majority of the registrable securities of PMI have the right to demand that PMI file a registration statement under the Securities Act, so long as the anticipated aggregate offering price, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, would exceed $20 million. These registration rights are subject to specified conditions and limitations. In addition, PMI is promptly required to give written notice to all holders of registrable securities prior to the filing of any registration statement under the Securities Act for purposes of a public offering of securities of PMI. The amended and restated investor rights agreement also provides that if PMI registers any of its shares for public sale, stockholders with registration rights will have the right to include their shares in the registration statement, subject to specified conditions and limitations. Further, in the amended and restated investor rights agreement, if PMI receives from any holders of registrable securities a written request that PMI effect a registration on Form S-3 (or any successor to Form S-3) or any similar short-form registration statement, PMI is required to use reasonable best efforts to file a Form S-3 registration statement and to effect such registration as would permit or facilitate the sale and distribution of all or such portion of such holder’s registrable securities as are specified in the request, so long as the anticipated aggregate offering price, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, would exceed $2.5 million.
Indemnification Agreements
PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that it will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. In addition, PMI has entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executive officers. For more information regarding these agreements, see Item 10, "Directors,“Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.—Limitations on Officers’ and Directors’ Liability and Indemnification Agreements"Agreements” for more information.
90


Policies and Processes for Transactions Involving Related Parties

PMI’s board of directors has not adopted a formal policy or procedure that must be followed prior to any transaction, arrangement or relationship with a related person, as defined by SEC regulations.
PMI has adopted a corporate Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance (the “Code”) that is enforced throughout all levels of management and deals with conflicts of interest, among other things. The Code requires PMI’s directors, officers and employees to avoid any conduct or activities that conflict, or appear to conflict, with Prosper’sour interests, or that may make it difficult for the individual to perform his or her duties objectively. The Code also requires directors and executive officers to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest to PMI’s Chief Compliance Officer, who will report such conflicts to PMI’s Audit Committee for review.
84




PMI’s directors and executive officers are required each year to respond to a questionnaire regarding their independence. The questionnaire also requires each director and executive officer to identify if they or an immediate family member hadhave been indebted to, or hadhave been a participant in any material transactions with, PMI or any of its subsidiaries. Additionally, PMI’s directors and executive officers are required to disclose on a quarterly basis whether they or an immediate family member had made any direct or indirect investments on Prosper’sour personal loan platform.
The standards applied pursuant to the above-described procedures are to provide comfort that potential conflicts of interest or related party transactions are identified and receivedreceive appropriate oversight and review.
Director Independence
For information regarding director independence, see Item 10, "Directors,“Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.—Director Independence."
ItemITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesPRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC
Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) served as PMI and PFL’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 and is serving in such capacity for the current fiscal year. Deloitte was engaged in October 2014.
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional services to PMI and PFL were $1,969$1,836 thousand and $1,845$2,132 thousand in 2018December 31, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
Audit Fees.Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional services rendered for PMI and PFL for the audit of annual financial statements, the review of the quarterly financial statements, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $1,824$1,584 thousand and $1,670$1,785 thousand in 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. 
Audit Related Fees.Fees 
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the PMI and PFL’s financial statements, but not included under Audit Fees were $143$250 thousand and $163$275 thousand in 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. These fees include the service organization control readiness assessment andare for service organization control assessment.  
Tax Fees.Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for 20182021 and 20172020 for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $0zero in 2021 and $10 thousand in 2018 and 2017. 2020. 
All Other Fees.Fees
Deloitte billed $2 thousand and $2$72 thousand, in 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, related to fees not included in “Audit”, “Audit Related Fees” or “Tax Fees.”
9185




PART IV
ItemITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement SchedulesEXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms (PCAOB ID No. 34)
(a1) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for PMI
(a2) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Prosper Funding LLC
(b) Documents List
(a) Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
(a1) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for PMI
(a2) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Prosper Funding LLC
(b) Documents List
1.Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
  
Prosper Funding LLC 
86



92


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Prosper Marketplace Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Marketplace Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, other comprehensive loss, convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows, , for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation of Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value — Refer to Notes 2, 4 and 7 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company measures Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale at fair value which are classified as Level 3 instruments. As of December 31, 2021, Borrower Loans were $267.6 million and Loans Held for Sale were $243.2 million. The Company estimates the fair value using discounted cash flow valuation methodologies incorporating significant unobservable inputs and valuation assumptions that are reflective of management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instruments and requires significant management judgment or estimate. The main assumptions used to value the Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade of the loans.
Auditing the methodology and unobservable inputs, specifically, the unobservable inputs related to the discount rate, default rate and prepayment rate, used by management to estimate the fair value of Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the valuation of Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale at fair value including unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value included the following key procedures:
F-1




We performed inquiries with management and the Company’s third-party valuation expert to understand the process for developing, and assumptions used in, the valuation models.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we developed independent estimates of fair value and compared our estimates to the Company’s estimates.
We tested the source information derived from the Company’s data used in the valuation models.
Valuation of Servicing Assets — Refer to Notes 2, 5 and 7 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company measures Servicing Assets at fair value which are classified as Level 3 instruments. As of December 31, 2021, Servicing Assets were $8.8 million. The Company estimates the fair value using a discounted cash flow valuation methodology incorporating significant unobservable inputs and valuation assumptions that are reflective of management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instruments and requires significant management judgment or estimation. Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation methodology include the market servicing rate, discount rate, default rate and prepayment rate.
Auditing the significant unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value of Servicing Assets required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and an increased extend of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialist.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the valuation of Servicing Assets at fair value including unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value included the following key procedures:
We performed inquiries with management and the Company’s third-party valuation expert to understand the process for developing, and assumptions used in, the valuation model.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we developed an independent estimate of fair value and compared our estimate to the Company’s estimate.
We evaluated the reasonableness of the market rate of servicing assumption used in developing the fair value estimate of the Servicing Assets.
We tested the source information derived from the Company’s data used in the valuation model.
Valuation of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability – Refer to Notes 2 and 12 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants are recorded at fair value and subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2021, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability was $250.9 million. To estimate the fair value of the Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants, the Company determines the business enterprise value of the Company using a variety of valuation methods, including recent transactions in the Company's stock, discounted cash flow models and market based methods, as deemed appropriate under the circumstances applicable at the valuation date. Once the business enterprise value has been estimated, an option pricing model is used to allocate the value to the various classes of equity, including preferred stock. The concluded per share value for the Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants is then determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Auditing the valuation methods used by management to estimate the fair value of the Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the valuation of the Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability included the following key procedures:
We performed inquiries with management and the Company’s third-party valuation expert to understand the process for developing, and assumptions used in, the valuation model.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists we evaluated the Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant valuation methodology, assumptions, and fair value results.
F-2




We evaluated whether management’s assumptions were reasonable including comparing management’s historical forecasts of future cash flows to actual results.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, CA
March 28, 2019

25, 2022
We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 2014.
F-3

F-1






Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
 December 31,December 31,
ASSETS20182017
Cash and Cash Equivalents$57,945 $45,795 
Restricted Cash149,114 152,668 
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value22,173 53,147 
Accounts Receivable5,119 683 
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value183,788 49 
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value263,522 293,005 
Property and Equipment, Net15,273 18,136 
Prepaid and Other Assets4,643 7,796 
Servicing Assets14,687 14,711 
Goodwill36,368 36,368 
Intangible Assets, Net999 1,377 
Total Assets$753,631 $623,735 
LIABILITIES,  CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS'
   DEFICIT
  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$19,967 $11,942 
Payable to Investors127,538 132,432 
Notes at Fair Value264,003 293,948 
Warehouse Line162,488 — 
Other Liabilities10,629 12,669 
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability143,679 116,366 
Total Liabilities728,304 567,357 
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 16)
Convertible Preferred Stock – $0.01 par value; 444,760,848 shares authorized as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017; 214,637,925 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Aggregate liquidation preference of $375,952 as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
323,793 323,793 
Stockholders' Deficit  
Common Stock – $0.01 par value; 625,000,000 shares authorized; 71,411,145 shares issued and 70,475,210 shares outstanding, as of December 31, 2018; 71,226,934 shares issued and 70,290,999 shares outstanding, as of December 31, 2017.
229 228 
Additional Paid-In Capital145,486 136,653 
Less: Treasury Stock(23,417)(23,417)
Accumulated Deficit(420,751)(380,806)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(13)(73)
Total Stockholders' Deficit$(298,466)$(267,415)
Total Liabilities,  Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit$753,631 $623,735 

 December 31,
20212020
Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents$67,700 $50,145 
Restricted Cash (1)167,925 163,723 
Accounts Receivable (1)1,054 605 
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value (1)243,170 274,621 
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value (1)267,626 378,263 
Property and Equipment, Net29,714 28,446 
Prepaid and Other Assets (1)6,238 5,196 
Servicing Assets8,761 9,242 
Goodwill36,368 36,368 
Intangible Assets, Net328 500 
Total Assets$828,884 $947,109 
Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders'
   Deficit:
 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$25,790 $17,876 
Payable to Investors152,794 124,094 
Notes, at Fair Value265,985 208,379 
Notes Issued by Securitization Trust (1)— 156,782 
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value (1)— 22,917 
Warehouse Lines (1)209,275 242,479 
Other Liabilities23,900 25,057 
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability250,941 112,319 
Total Liabilities$928,685 $909,903 
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 17)00
Convertible Preferred Stock – $0.01 par value; 444,760,848 shares authorized as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020; 209,613,570 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Aggregate liquidation preference of $370,456 as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.$322,748 $322,748 
Less: Convertible Preferred Stock Held by Consolidated VIE (Note 12), 51,247,915 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.(2,381)(2,381)
Stockholders' Deficit:  
Common Stock – $0.01 par value; 625,000,000 shares authorized; 73,089,929 shares issued and 72,153,994 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021; 70,075,307 shares issued and 69,139,372 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020245 215 
Additional Paid-In Capital157,256 155,952 
Less: Treasury Stock(23,417)(23,417)
Accumulated Deficit(554,252)(415,911)
Total Stockholders' Deficit$(420,168)$(283,161)
Total Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit$828,884 $947,109 
(1) Includes amounts in consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) presented separately in the table below.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2F-4


Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
 Year ended December 31,
 201820172016
REVENUES  
Operating Revenues  
Transaction Fees, Net$123,373 $130,174 $95,130 
Servicing Fees, Net29,025 27,206 28,903 
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans13,147 11,431 3,637 
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans(72,316)(60,122)— 
Other Revenues4,697 4,806 5,245 
Total Operating Revenues97,926 113,495 132,915 
Interest Income   
Interest Income on Borrower Loans57,716 47,208 44,649 
Interest Expense on Notes and Warehouse Line(45,886)(43,954)(41,187)
Net Interest Income11,830 3,254 3,462 
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(5,395)(514)(372)
Total Net Revenues104,361 116,235 136,005 
EXPENSES   
Origination and Servicing35,116 34,881 33,944 
Sales and Marketing77,997 83,462 70,146 
General and Administrative72,371 75,686 102,735 
Restructuring Charges, Net1,762 1,340 17,027 
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants(45,003)29,140 
Other Expenses, Net1,891 7,392 30,341 
Total Expenses144,134 231,901 254,200 
Net Loss Before Taxes(39,773)(115,666)(118,195)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)172 (508)546 
Net Loss$(39,945)$(115,158)$(118,741)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted$(0.57)$(1.65)$(1.85)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted70,384,501 69,687,836 64,196,537 


The following table presents the assets and liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets above. The assets in the table below may only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs and are in excess of those obligations. Additionally, the assets and liabilities in the table below include third-party assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs only and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. On September 27, 2021, assets and liabilities held by the securitization trusts consolidated by PMI as VIEs were removed from the balance sheet as part of the deconsolidation of those entities. See Note 6 - Securitizations and Note 10 - Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
December 31,
20212020
Assets of consolidated VIEs, included in total assets above:
Restricted Cash$5,128 $25,203 
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value243,170 274,621 
Borrower Loans, Held at Fair Value— 168,593 
Prepaid and Other Assets2,846 2,043 
Total assets of consolidated variable interest entities$251,144 $470,460 
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs, included in total liabilities above:
Notes Issued by Securitization Trust$— $156,782 
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value— 22,917 
Warehouse Lines209,275 242,479 
Total liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities$209,275 $422,178 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3F-5





Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive LossOperations
(in thousands)
Year ended December 31,
201820172016
Net Loss$(39,945)$(115,158)$(118,741)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax  
Change in Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value60 (74)148 
Realized (Gain) Loss on Sale of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value— (12)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax60 (65)136 
Income Tax Effect— — — 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax60 (65)136 
Comprehensive Loss$(39,885)$(115,223)$(118,605)
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Revenues:  
Operating Revenues:  
Transaction Fees, Net$89,364 $67,335 $119,282 
Servicing Fees, Net15,024 18,517 23,406 
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans7,196 4,816 10,946 
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans— — (17,553)
Other Revenues3,992 2,711 5,953 
Total Operating Revenues115,576 93,379 142,034 
Interest Income (Expense):   
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale83,107 104,150 100,786 
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments(50,816)(60,127)(63,736)
Total Interest Income, Net32,291 44,023 37,050 
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(3,241)(34,166)(25,514)
Total Net Revenue144,626 103,236 153,570 
Expenses:   
Origination and Servicing35,056 29,897 34,915 
Sales and Marketing35,065 29,259 73,824 
General and Administrative73,122 63,384 71,588 
Impairment Expenses— 445 — 
Restructuring Charges, Net— — 34 
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants138,622 (37,677)(11,235)
Loss on Deconsolidation of VIEs1,494 — — 
Other Income, Net(463)(639)(1,945)
Total Expenses282,896 84,669 167,181 
Net (Loss) Income Before Income Taxes(138,270)18,567 (13,611)
Income Tax Expense(71)(16)(100)
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,711)
Plus: Return on Share Purchase— 2,381 1,066 
Less: Net Income Allocated to Participating Securities— (15,172)— 
Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Common Stockholders$(138,341)$5,760 $(12,645)
Net (Loss) Income Per Share – Basic$(1.95)$0.08 $(0.18)
Net (Loss) Income Per Share – Diluted$(1.95)$0.02 $(0.18)
Weighted-Average Shares – Basic70,767,27568,592,55770,511,605
Weighted-Average Shares – Diluted70,767,275306,673,58670,511,605
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6




Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,711)
Other Comprehensive Income, Before Tax:  
Change in Net Unrealized (Loss) Gain on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value— — 13 
Other Comprehensive Income, Before Tax— — 13 
Income Tax Effect— — — 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax— — 13 
Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Tax$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,698)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4F-7




Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Deficit
(in thousands, except for share amounts)
 Convertible Preferred Stock Common StockTreasury Stock    
 Shares AmountSharesAmountSharesAmount
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated
Deficit
Total
Balance as of January 1, 2016177,388,425 275,938 74,608,725 127 (5,177,235)(23,417)102,971 (144)(146,907)(67,370)
Exercise of vested stock options— — 466,300 — — 305 — — 311 
Repurchase of restricted stock— — (673,750)— — — — — — — 
Restricted stock vested— — — 79 — — 196 — — 275 
Issuance of common stock, for settlement of vested RSUs— — 635,068 — — — — — — — 
Exercise of warrants— — 48,001 — — — 11 — — 11 
Stock-based compensation
   expense
— — — — — — 20,505 — — 20,505 
Change in net unrealized loss on available for sale investments, at fair value— — — — — — — 136 — 136 
Net Loss— — — — — — — — (118,741)(118,741)
Balance as of December 31, 2016177,388,425 275,938 75,084,344 212 (5,177,235)(23,417)123,988 (8)(265,648)(164,873)
Issuance of convertible preferred stock, Series G, net of issuance costs37,249,497 47,855 — — — — — — — — 
Exercise of vested stock
   options
— — 606,284 — — 97 — — 103 
Repurchase of restricted stock— — (266,130)— — — — — — — 
Restricted stock vested— — — 10 — — 31 — — 41 
Exercise of warrants— 43,736 — — — — — 
Stock-based compensation expense— — — — — — 12,532 — — 12,532 
Change in net unrealized loss on available for sale investments, at fair value— — — — — — — (65)— (65)
Net Loss— — — — — — — — (115,158)(115,158)
Balance as of December 31, 2017214,637,925 323,793 75,468,234 228 (5,177,235)(23,417)136,653 (73)(380,806)(267,415)
Exercise of vested stock options— — 176,011 — — 27 — — 28 
Restricted stock vested— — — — — — 13 — — 13 
Exercise of warrants— — 8,200 — — — — — — — 
Stock-based compensation expense— — — — — — 8,793 — — 8,793 
Change in net unrealized loss on available for sale investments, at fair value— — — — — — — 60 — 60 
Net Loss— — — — — — — — (39,945)(39,945)
Balance as of December 31, 2018214,637,925 323,793 75,652,445 229 (5,177,235)(23,417)145,486 (13)(420,751)(298,466)

F-5


The number of shares reflects a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016.
 Convertible Preferred StockConvertible Preferred Stock Held by Consolidated VIECommon StockTreasury Stock
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated
Deficit
Total
 SharesAmountSharesAmountSharesAmountSharesAmount
Balance at January 1, 2019214,637,925 $323,793  $ 75,652,445 $229 (5,177,235)$(23,417)$145,486 $(13)$(420,751)$(298,466)
Repurchase of Common Stock— — — — (2,196,665)(22)— — 22 — — — 
Repurchase of Convertible Preferred Stock(5,024,355)(1,045)— — — — — — 1,045 — — 1,045 
Exercise of vested stock options— — — — 173,356 — — 24 — — 25 
Stock-based compensation expense— — — — — — — — 4,839 — — 4,839 
Change in net unrealized loss on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value— — — — — — — — — 13 — 13 
Net Loss— — — — — — — — — — (13,711)(13,711)
Balance at December 31, 2019209,613,570 322,748   73,629,136 208 (5,177,235)(23,417)151,416  (434,462)(306,255)
Exercise of vested stock options— — — — 687,471 — — — — 15 
Stock-based compensation expense— — — — — — — — 2,147 — — 2,147 
Purchase of Convertible Preferred Stock by consolidated VIE Prosper Grantor Trust (Note 12)— — (51,247,915)(2,381)— — — — 2,381 — — 2,381 
Net Income— — — — — — — — — — 18,551 18,551 
Balance at December 31, 2020209,613,570 $322,748 (51,247,915)$(2,381)74,316,607 $215 (5,177,235)$(23,417)$155,952 $ $(415,911)$(283,161)
Exercise of vested stock options— — — — 3,014,622 30 — — 31 — — 61 
Stock-based compensation expense— — — — — — — — 1,273 — — 1,273 
Net Loss— — — — — — — — — — (138,341)(138,341)
Balance at December 31, 2021209,613,570 $322,748 (51,247,915)$(2,381)77,331,229 $245 (5,177,235)$(23,417)$157,256 $ $(554,252)$(420,168)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-8


F-6


Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
For the For the Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
 2018 2017 2016 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:    
Net Loss(39,945)(115,158)(118,741)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:    
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes5,307 514 372 
Depreciation and Amortization9,968 12,348 13,220 
Gain on Sales of Borrower Loans(13,171)(14,138)(9,634)
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights13,148 12,074 11,053 
Stock-Based Compensation Expense8,401 12,238 19,787 
Restructuring Liability1,576 1,343 6,052 
Fair Value of Warrants Vested72,317 61,605 — 
Change in Fair Value of Warrants(45,004)29,140 — 
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration— — 199 
Other, Net(1,281)377 1,534 
Impairment Losses on Assets Held for Sale— 6,399 — 
Warrants Issued for Contract Termination— — 21,711 
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:    
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value(2,365,431)(2,619,130)(1,979,952)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value2,178,498 2,619,709 1,979,352 
Accounts Receivable(4,435)74 1,677 
Prepaid and Other Assets4,581 (3,208)1,825 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities7,566 (2,268)379 
Payable to Investors(4,894)(10,212)6,137 
Other Liabilities(3,683)(2,496)(12,179)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities(176,482)(10,789)(57,208)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:    
Purchase of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value(177,101)(194,887)(217,582)
Principal Payments of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value175,117 192,054 173,710 
Purchases of Property and Equipment(5,889)(4,174)(10,760)
Maturities of Short Term Investments— 1,280 1,279 
Purchases of Short Term Investments— (1,262)(1,277)
Purchases of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value(23,266)(68,297)(11,725)
Proceeds from Sale of Available for Sale Securities— 31,232 12,445 
Maturities of Available for Sale Securities54,750 16,600 39,593 
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities23,611 (27,454)(14,317)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:    
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes Held at Fair Value176,830 194,391 217,767 
Payments of Notes Held at Fair Value(175,760)(191,828)(173,958)
Proceeds from Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock, Net— 47,855 — 
Proceeds from Warehouse Line161,797 — — 
Payment for Debt Issuance Costs(1,428)— — 
Proceeds from Exercise of Warrants and Stock Options including Early Exercise, and Issuance of Restricted Stock28 123 541 
Repurchase of Common Stock and Restricted Stock— (64)(80)
Taxes Paid for Awards Vested Under Equity Incentive Plans— (15)(219)
F-7


Contingent Consideration Paid— — (3,800)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities161,467 50,462 40,251 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash8,596 12,219 (31,274)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period198,463 186,244 217,518 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period$207,059 $198,463 $186,244 
Cash Paid for Interest$45,320 $43,776 $40,369 
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net630 171 382 
Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,711)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net (Loss) Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities: 
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net3,241 34,160 27,306 
Depreciation and Amortization9,839 8,349 7,676 
Amortization of Operating Lease Right-of-Use Asset3,774 3,487 3,494 
Impairment of Operating Lease Right-of-Use Asset— 445 — 
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(7,973)(5,830)(11,924)
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights8,454 9,189 12,476 
Stock-based Compensation Expense1,136 1,913 4,529 
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans— — 17,552 
Loss on Deconsolidation of VIEs (Note 6)1,494 — — 
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants138,622 (37,677)(11,235)
Other, Net2,027 1,675 1,118 
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value(1,712,705)(1,338,082)(2,320,560)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value1,770,822 1,254,474 2,241,569 
Accounts Receivable(449)1,090 3,424 
Prepaid and Other Assets639 498 1,350 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities7,776 (2,187)(106)
Payable to Investors28,700 23,002 (26,446)
Other Liabilities(3,493)(5,391)(4,590)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities113,563 (32,334)(68,078)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:  
Purchase of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value(231,998)(133,644)(170,328)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value236,861 279,658 254,845 
Purchases of Property and Equipment(12,041)(8,359)(10,312)
Purchases of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value— — (1,488)
Maturities of Available for Sale Securities— — 23,763 
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities(7,178)137,655 96,480 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:  
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes Held at Fair Value231,933 133,228 171,138 
Payments of Notes Held at Fair Value(172,250)(149,409)(167,419)
Principal Payments on Notes Issued by Securitization Trust(87,700)(192,771)(134,250)
Principal Payments on Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust(14,935)(22,136)(13,770)
Proceeds from Securitization Issuance— — 8,962 
Net cash and restricted cash outflows from Deconsolidation of VIEs (Note 6)(6,821)— — 
Proceeds from Warehouse Lines68,800 126,149 186,010 
Principal payments on Warehouse Lines(101,900)(15,300)(57,899)
Principal payments on financing lease(76)(84)— 
Proceeds from Paycheck Protection Program Loan— 8,447 — 
Payment for Debt Issuance Costs(1,740)— (7,850)
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options61 15 25 
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities(84,628)(111,861)(15,053)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash21,757 (6,540)13,349 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Year213,868 220,408 207,059 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Year$235,625 $213,868 $220,408 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash Paid for Interest$49,923 $57,697 $60,642 
Non-Cash Investing Activity - Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net$971 $833 $707 
Non-Cash Investing Activity - Deconsolidation of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value$78,361 $— $— 
Non-Cash Financing Activity - Deconsolidation of Notes Issued by Securitization Trust$69,709 $— $— 
Non-Cash Financing Activity - Deconsolidation of Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value$13,979 $— $— 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new financing lease obligation$— $239 $— 
Non-Cash Investing Activity - Consolidation of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value$— $— $(391,383)
Non-Cash Financing Activity- Issuance of Securitization Notes and Certificates$— $— $554,892 
Non-Cash Financing Activity- Derecognition of Warehouse Line Debt$— $— $(158,857)
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets
Cash and Cash Equivalents$67,700 $50,145 $64,635 
Restricted Cash167,925 163,723 155,773 
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$235,625 $213,868 $220,408 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-9
F-8



PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. Organization and BusinessORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on March 22, 2005. Except as the context requires otherwise, as used in these notes to consolidated financial statements of PMI, “Prosper,” “we,” “us,”Prosper Marketplace, Inc., “Prosper”, “PMI”, and “our”the "Company" refer to PMIProsper Marketplace, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
PMI developed a peer-to-peer online credit marketplace (the “marketplace”), and in February 2013, transferred ownership of the marketplace to Prosper Funding LLC (“PFL”), its wholly-owned subsidiary. All of the borrower payment dependent notes (“Notes”) issued and sold through the marketplace today are issued and sold by PFL. PFL also operates the marketplace and facilitates the origination of unsecured, consumerpersonal loans by WebBank (“Borrower Loans”), an FDIC-insured, Utah-chartered industrial bank, through the marketplace. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the marketplace as agent of WebBank in connection with the submission of loan applications by potential borrowers,borrowers. PMI also manages the origination of related loans by WebBank and the funding of such Borrower Loans by WebBank. On February 1, 2013, PFL entered into an Administration Agreement with PMI in its capacity as licensee, corporate administrator, loan marketplace administrator and loan and Note servicer, pursuant to which PMI provides certain back office support, loan platform administration and loan servicing to PFL.
The marketplace is designed to allow investors to invest in Borrower Loans in an open, transparent marketplace, with the aim of allowing both investors and borrowers to benefit financially as well as socially. Prosper believes marketplace lending represents a model of consumer lending, where individuals and institutions can earn the interest spread of a traditional consumer lender but must also assume the credit risk of a traditional consumer lender.
A borrower who wishes to obtain a Borrower Loan through the marketplace must post a loan listing on the marketplace. Listings are allocated to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on PFL’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from Prosper.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the marketplace is open to investors in 3130 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2018,2021, the marketplace is open to borrowers in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Currently our marketplace does not operate internationally.
F-9


Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


NOTE 2. Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNT POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PMI and its wholly owned subsidiaries including PFL, PWIT, PHL,Prosper Healthcare Lending LLC (“PHL”), BillGuard, Inc. (“BillGuard”), and BillGuard.its consolidated VIEs including Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”), Prosper Warehouse II Trust (“PWIIT”), Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-1 (“PMIT 2019-1,” deconsolidated on September 27, 2021), Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-2 (“PMIT 2019-2,” deconsolidated on September 27, 2021), Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-4 (“PMIT 2019-4,” deconsolidated on September 27, 2021) and Prosper Grantor Trust (“PGT”). All intercompany balances and transactions between PMI and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. PMI and PFL’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StatesU.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures, including contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include but are not limited to the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust (Note 6), valuation of servicing rights and loan trailing fee liability, valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, stock-based compensation expense, intangible assets, goodwill, contingent consideration, restructuring liability, convertible preferred stock warrant liabilityIntangible Assets, Goodwill, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, Repurchase Obligations and contingent liabilities. ActualThese judgments, estimates and assumptions are inherently subjective in nature and actual results couldmay differ from those estimates.
Certain Risks

In the normal course of its business, Prosper encounters significant credit risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject Prosper to significant credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, available for sale investments, loans held for sale, borrower loans heldthese estimates and restricted cash. Prosper places cash and restricted cash with high-quality financial institutions and is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent the amount recorded on the balance sheet exceeds federally insured amounts. Prosper invests cash equivalents and available for sale investments in highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase, consisting primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, US treasury securities and US agency securities.

With regard to Loans Held for Sale, while these loans are on our balance sheet, we have exposure to the credit risk of the borrowers. In the event of a decline or volatility in the credit risk of these borrowers, the value of these loans held may decline. This may adversely affect the liquidity of these loans held, which could produce losses if the Company is unable to realize their fair value or manage declines in their value.

To the extent that payments on Borrower Loans (including Borrower Loans that have been sold) are not made, interest income and/or servicing income will be reduced. A series of Notes corresponding to a particular Borrower Loan is wholly dependent on the repayment of such Borrower Loan. As a result, Prosper does not bear the credit risk on such Borrower Loan.assumptions.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
The determination of whether to consolidate aA variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which we have a variable interest requires a significant amount of analysis and judgment around whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE via a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest in a VIE exists if we have both the power to direct the VIE’s activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and a potentially significant economic interest in the VIE. The determination of whether an entity(VIE) is a VIE considers factors, such as (i) whether the entity’slegal entity that has either a total equity investment at riskthat is insufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) when a holder’swhose equity investment at risk lacks any ofinvestors lack the following characteristics of a controlling financial interest:interest. Prosper’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in the direct or indirect ability through voting rights or similar rights to make decisions about a legal entity’s activities that have a significant effect onentity, which change with fluctuations in the fair value of the entity’s success, the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the legal entity. 
net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is
F-10


As a result of the nature of the retained servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, we are a variable interest holder in certain special purposes entitiesparty that purchase these Borrower Loans.   For all of these entities we either do not havehas both the power to direct the activities that most significantly affectimpact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or we do not have athe right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant economic interest into the VIE. In no case are weProsper consolidates a VIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Prosper assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary therefore, we do not consolidate these entities.  
Management regularly reviews and reconsiders its previous conclusions regarding the status of an entity as a VIE and whether we are required to consolidate such VIE in the consolidated financial statements.on an ongoing basis.
Transfers of Financial Assets
Prosper accounts for transfers of entire financial assets or a participating interest in an entire financial asset as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from Prosper, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and Prosper has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold significantunconditional call options and has not written significant put options on the transferred assets.
In assessing whether control has been surrendered, Prosper sells loans or participating interests in loans via whole loan sale transactionsconsiders whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the fractional Note channel. In certain instancesimpact of whole loan sales transactionsall arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the transfer, even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer. Prosper will sell whole loans to unconsolidated VIEs that then securitize the whole loans purchased.
Prosper recognizes ameasures gain or loss on the sale of financial assets by comparingas the net sales proceeds (including fair value of any servicing asset or liability and recourse obligation recognized) toreceived on the sale less the carrying amount of the assetsloans sold. Transfers of financial assets that do not qualify for sale accounting are reported as secured borrowings. Accordingly, the related assets remain on Prosper’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and continue to be reported and accounted for as if the transfer had not occurred. CashThe net proceeds from these transfers are reported as liabilities, with related interest expense recognized over the life of the related assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with investment grade rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consistsale include the fair value of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturitiesany assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, US treasurytransaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and US agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. 
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificate of deposit accounts held as collateral as required for long term leases, loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper have on our marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets that sum to the total of the same such amount shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows:

December 31, 2018December 31, 2017December 31, 2016
Cash and Cash Equivalents $57,945 45,795 $22,337 
Restricted Cash 149,114 152,668 163,907 
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows $207,059 $198,463 $186,244 

Short Term Investments
F-11


Short Term Investments which are included in Prepaid and Other Assets consist of certificates of deposit with a term greater than three months but less than a year that are held as collateral as required for loan funding and servicing activities.
Available for Sale Investments
Available for sale securities consist of commercial paper with terms longer than three months, US treasury securities, US agency securities and corporate debt securities.  Available for sale investments are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in stockholders' equity unless management determines that an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired.   
Management evaluates whether impairment of available for sale debt securities are other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on a quarterly basis. Debt securities with unrealized losses are considered OTTI if Prosper intends to sell the investment or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell such investment before any anticipated recovery. If management determines that an investment is OTTI under these circumstances, the impairment recognized in earnings is measured as the entire difference between the amortized cost and then-current fair value.
An investment is also OTTI if management does not expect to recover all of the amortized cost of the investment. In this circumstance, the impairment recognized in earnings represents estimated credit losses, and is measured by the difference between the present value of expected cash flows and the amortized cost of the investment. Management utilizes cash flow models to estimate the expected future cash flow from the securities to estimate the credit loss. Expected cash flows are discounted using the investment's effective interest rate.  The evaluation of whether Prosper expects to recover the amortized cost of an investment is inherently judgmental. The evaluation includes the assessment of several bond performance indicators, including the current price and magnitude of the unrealized loss and whether Prosper has received all scheduled principal and interest payments. There were no impairment charges recognized during the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.recourse obligations.
Fair Value Measurement
Prosper measures the fairFair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with its fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. We apply this framework whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.
We define fair value in terms ofis the price that would be received upon the sale ofto sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The price used to measure theFinancial instruments measured at fair value isconsist principally of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Servicing Assets, Loan Trailing Fee Liabilities (Note 9), Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust (Note 6) and Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability. The estimated fair values of other financial instruments, including Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, Accrued Liabilities and Payable to Investors approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature. The estimated fair values of the Paycheck Protection Program loan (Note 9 and 10), Notes Issued by Securitization Trust (Note 6) and Warehouse Lines do not adjusted for transaction costs. approximate their carrying values due primarily to differences in the stated and market rates associated with these instruments.
The fair value measurement also assumes thathierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is based on whether the transaction to sell an asset occurs in the principal market for the asset or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset. The principal market is the market in which Prosper would sell or transfer the asset with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset. In determining the principal market for an asset or liability, it is assumed that Prosper has accessinputs to the market as of thevaluation methodology used for measurement date. If no market for the asset exists or if Prosper does not have access to the principal market, Prosper uses a hypothetical market.
Assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the balance sheet are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value:observable:
Level 1 — The valuation is based on quotedQuoted market prices in active markets for identical instruments.assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such asInputs other than quoted prices for similar instrumentsincluded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in marketsLevel 1 that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologiesobservable for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.asset or liability either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to theUnobservable inputs.
When developing fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation.
F-12


Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximizemeasurements, Prosper maximizes the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimizeminimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments Prosper must utilize unobservable inputs whenin determining fair value due to the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identicalIn instances where there is limited or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active andno observable market data, for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value ismeasurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Financial instruments consist principally of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Available for Sale Investments, Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Payable to Investors, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability and Notes. Servicing Assets and Liabilities are also subject to fair value measurement within the financial statements of Prosper. The estimated fair values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, and Payable to Investors approximate their carrying values because of their short term nature.
As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust and Notes,Servicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, Prosper believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust and Notes should beServicing Assets are considered level 3 financial instruments. InProsper primarily uses a hypothetical transaction as of the measurement date, Prosper believes that differences in the principal marketplace in which the Borrower Loans are originated and the principal marketplace in which Prosper might offer those loans may result in differences between the originated amount of the loans anddiscounted cash flow model to estimate their fair value, as of the transaction date. For Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, the fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based uponkey assumptions used in valuation assumptions including prepayment speeds,include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on estimates of the perceived credit risk within each credit grade.rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to investors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, the fair value of a series of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursed to such Note holders.payments. As a result, the valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate
F-11


the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing in payments. Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations. The effective interest rate associated with a group of Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee.
Refer to Note 7 for additional fair value disclosures.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with investment-grade rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, US treasury securities and US agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
At times, our cash balances may exceed federally insured amounts and potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk. The Company believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to these balances based on its assessment of the creditworthiness of these financial institutions.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of cash deposits, money market funds and short term certificate of deposit accounts held as collateral as required for long term leases, loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper have on the marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust
Borrower Loans are funded either through the Note Channel or through the Whole Loan Channel. Through the Note Channel, Prosper purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues Notes to investors and holds the Borrower Loans until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans. Borrower Loans funded and Notes issued through the Note Channel are carried on Prosper’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. 
In 2019, Prosper began refinancing the purchase of Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel through securitization transactions, which issued senior notes, risk retention interests, and residual certificates. Associated securitization trusts were deemed consolidated VIEs until September 2021, when the Company sold its share of the residual certificates issued by these securitization trusts and deconsolidated the VIEs. Prior to their deconsolidation, the Borrower Loans held in the securitization trusts were included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value”, senior notes sold to third party investors were included in “Notes Issued by Securitization Trust”, and the risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors were included in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 6 - Securitization for additional disclosures and details on the deconsolidation of these securitization trust VIEs.
Prosper uses Warehouse Lines to purchase Loans Held for Sale that may be subsequently contributed to securitization transactions or sold to investors. Loans Held for Sale are included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.See Note 410 - Debt for a roll-forward and further discussion of the significant assumptions used to value more details on Warehouse Lines.
Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale are purchased from WebBank. Prosper places Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, Prosper stops accruing interest and reverses all accrued but unpaid interest as of such date. Additionally, Prosper charges-off Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value of loans 120 or more days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from debt sales in subsequent periods.
Prosper has elected the fair value option for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans funded through the Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent design of the Notes. Changes in the fair value of Borrower Loans held in consolidated securitization trusts were partially offset by changes in fair value of the Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, prior to the deconsolidation of these securitization trusts in September 2021. Changes in fair value of Loans Held for Sale are recorded through Proper's earnings and Prosper collects interest on Loans Held for Sale. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust are included in “Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. The key assumptions used in valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
F-12


Servicing Assets
Prosper records Servicing Assets at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when Prosper sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of Servicing Assets is recognized in Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market servicing rate is recorded in Servicing Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Prosper uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan Servicing Assets which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that Prosper earns on the Borrower Loans, the estimated market servicing rates to service such loans, the prepayment rates, the default rates and the current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.
Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment consists of computer equipment, office furniture and equipment, leasehold improvements, software purchased or developed for internal use and web site development costs. Property and Equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, and is computed using the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives of the assets are as follows:

Furniture and fixtures7 years
Office equipment5 years
Computers and equipment3 years
Leasehold improvements5-8 years
Software and website development costs1-5 years

The costs to develop software for the website and other internal uses are capitalized when management has authorized and committed project funding, when preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, and when it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Capitalized software and website development costs primarily include software licenses acquired, fees paid to outside consultants and salaries and payroll-related costs for employees directly involved in the development efforts.
Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria, together with costs incurred for training and maintenance, are expensed. Costs incurred for upgrades and enhancements that are considered to be probable to result in additional functionality are capitalized. Capitalized costs are included in Property and Equipment and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives. Software and website development assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset group to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software and website development asset group.
Leases
Management determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Property and Equipment, Net and in Other Liabilities, respectively. For certain leases with original terms of twelve months or less, PMI recognizes the lease expense as incurred and does not recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities.
If a contract contains a lease, management evaluates whether it should be classified as an operating or finance lease. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. As most of PMI's leases do not provide an implicit rate, management uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The operating lease ROU assets are evaluated for impairment utilizing the same impairment model used for Property and Equipment.
F-13


Goodwill and Intangibles
Goodwill associated with business combinations is computed by recognizing the portion of the purchase price that is not tied to individually identifiable and separately recognizable assets. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or whenever indications of impairment exist. Annual impairment testing occurs on October 1. Impairment exists whenever the carrying value of Goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Adverse changes in impairment indicators such as loss of key personnel, increased regulatory oversight or unplanned changes in operations could result in impairment. PMI did not recognize any Goodwill impairments during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
Costs of internally developing any intangibles is expensed as incurred. Intangible Assets identified through the acquisitions of American Healthcare Lending and BillGuard include customer relationships, technology and a brand name. The user base and customer relationship Intangible Assets are being amortized on an accelerated basis over a three to ten year period. The technology and brand name Intangible Assets were amortized on a straight-line basis over three to five years and one year, respectively.
Payable to Investors
Payable to Investors primarily represents the obligation to investors related to cash held in an account for the benefit of investors and payments-in-process received from borrowers.
Warehouse Lines and Notes Issued by Securitization Trust
Warehouse Lines and Notes Issued by Securitization Trust (prior to deconsolidation in September 2021) are carried at amortized cost. Prosper defers specific incremental costs directly related to entering into the Warehouse Lines and issuing Notes Issued by Securitization Trust and subsequently amortizes them into interest expense over the life of the arrangements.
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability
Prosper has entered into varying arrangements with investors to issue preferred stock warrants in exchange for their participation as a purchaser of Borrower Loans. In all cases, these warrants are free standing financial instruments due to their status as legally detached and separately exercisable warrants without conditions requiring Prosper to repurchase those warrants or the underlying preferred shares. These freestanding warrants are accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”). Under ASC 480, vested freestanding warrants to purchase the Company’s convertible redeemable preferred stock are classified as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and carried at fair value because the warrants may conditionally obligate the Company to transfer assets at some point in the future. The Company records the warrants at fair value on issuance. The warrants are subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date, and any change in their fair value is recognized as “Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company will continue to adjust the liability for changes in fair value until the earlier of the exercise or expiration of the warrants, the completion of a deemed liquidation event or the conversion of convertible redeemable preferred stock into Common Stock.
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
On July 1, 2016, Prosper signed a series of agreements with WebBank which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the “Loan Trailing Fee”) paid to WebBank in connection with the performance of each loan sold to Prosper. These agreements became effective as of August 1, 2016. The Loan Trailing Fee is dependent on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers of the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by Prosper, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interest in the performance of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by Prosper to WebBank over the term of the respective loans and is a function of the principal and interest payments made by borrowers of such loans. In the event that principal and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, Prosper is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to Prosper is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination of such loan within Other Liabilities and recorded as a reduction of “Transaction Fees, net”. Any changes in the fair value of this liability are recorded in “Servicing Fees, Net” on the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue primarily results from transaction and Servicing Fees and net interest income earned. Fees include Transaction Fees for our services performed on behalf of WebBank to originate a loan. PMI also has other smaller sources of revenue reported as Other Revenues, including referral fees, and securitization fees.
F-14


Transaction Fees
Prosper has a customer contract with WebBank to facilitate the origination of all Borrower Loans through Prosper’s marketplace. In exchange for these services, Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank that is recognized when performance is complete and upon the successful origination of a Borrower Loan. The transaction fee Prosper earns is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan that is facilitated on Prosper’s marketplace, and ranges from 1.0% to 5.0% of the original principal amount of each Borrower Loan that WebBank originates.  Prosper records the transaction fee net of any fees paid to WebBank because Prosper does not receive an identifiable benefit from WebBank other than the borrower loan that has been recognized at fair value.  
Servicing Fees
Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper typically pay Prosper a servicing fee which is generally set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the borrower loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper for the costs incurred in servicing the borrower loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received.
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans
Prosper recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. Prosper measures gain or loss on sale of Borrower Loans as the net proceeds received on a sale less the fair value of the Borrower Loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and repurchase obligations.
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale and Interest Expense on Financial Instruments
Prosper recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent we believe it to be collectible. We record interest expense on the corresponding Notes, at Fair Value, Notes Issued by Securitization Trust, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Warehouse Lines based on the contractual interest rates.
Other Revenues
Other Revenues consist primarily of securitization fees and credit referral fees. Credit referral fees are where partner companies pay us an agreed upon amount for successful referrals of customers from our marketplace. The transaction price is a fixed amount per referral and is recognized by the Company upon a successful referral. Securitization fees represent fees Prosper earns to facilitate securitizations for purchasers of Borrower Loans and is recognized as “Other Revenues” when the securitization is completed.
As of December 31, 2021, Prosper had no contract assets, contract liabilities or deferred contract costs. As of December 31, 2021, Prosper had no unsatisfied performance obligations related to Transaction Fees or Other Revenues.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and are included in “Sales and Marketing” expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prosper incurred advertising costs of $6.1 million, $6.8 million and $32.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
Management determines the fair value of the Company's stock options issued to employees on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is impacted by the fair value of Common Stock as well as by changes in assumptions that include, but are not limited to, the expected Common Stock price volatility over the term of the option awards, the expected term of the awards, risk-free interest rates and the expected dividend yield.
PMI recognizes compensation expense for stock-based awards on a straight-line basis over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (the vesting period of the award). Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards expected to vest. PMI estimates future forfeitures at the date of grant and revises the estimates, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from estimates.
Stock-based awards issued to non-employees are marked-to-market up until the point that the awards measurement period has been achieved. Compensation expense for stock options issued to non-employees is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is recorded over the vesting period of the award.
F-15


Income Taxes
The asset and liability method is used to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement carrying values and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Prosper’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within its provision for income taxes. U.S. Federal, California and other state income tax returns are filed. Prosper is not currently undergoing any income tax examinations. Due to the cumulative net operating loss, generally all tax years remain open.
Prosper recognizes benefits from uncertain tax positions only if management believes that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement.
Other Income, Net
Other Income, Net includes interest income from Available for Sale Investments, sublease income, SEC settlement costs and contract termination costs that are expected to be non-recurring and not part of restructuring activities.
Restructuring ChargesTransaction Fees
Restructuring charges consistProsper has a customer contract with WebBank to facilitate the origination of severance costs and contract termination related costs and impairment charges associated with the severance actions. A liabilityall Borrower Loans through Prosper’s marketplace. In exchange for severance coststhese services, Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank that is typically recognized when performance is complete and upon the plansuccessful origination of terminationa Borrower Loan. The transaction fee Prosper earns is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan that is facilitated on Prosper’s marketplace, and ranges from 1.0% to 5.0% of the original principal amount of each Borrower Loan that WebBank originates.  Prosper records the transaction fee net of any fees paid to WebBank because Prosper does not receive an identifiable benefit from WebBank other than the borrower loan that has been communicated to the affected employees and is measured at its fair value at the communication date. Contract termination costs consist primarily of costs that will continue to be incurred under operating leases for their remaining terms without economic benefit to the Company. A liability for contract termination costs is recognized at the date the Company ceases using the rights conveyed by the lease contract and is measured at its fair value, which is determined based on the remaining contractual lease rentals reduced by estimated sublease rentals.value.  
Borrower Loans and NotesServicing Fees
Through the Note Channel, Prosper purchasesInvestors who purchase Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues Notes,Prosper typically pay Prosper a servicing fee which is generally set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the borrower loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper for the costs incurred in servicing the borrower loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and holdsmaintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received.
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans
Prosper recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loan. Borrower Loans funded and Notes issued through the Note Channel are carried on Prosper’s balance sheet as assets and liabilities, respectively. We choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful for the readers of the financial statements andwhen it allows both the Borrower Loans and Notes to be valued using the same methodology. The fair value election, with respect to an item, may not be revoked once an election is made. Prosper estimates the fair value of such Borrower Loans and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologies that take into account expected prepayments, losses,
F-13


recoveries and default rates.   The Borrower Loans are not derecognized when a corresponding Note is issued as Prosper maintains the ability to sell the Borrower Loans without the approval of the holders of the corresponding Notes.  
Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper records servicing assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when Prosper sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of servicing assets and liabilities is recognized in “Servicing Fees” revenue. Thethird parties. Prosper measures gain or loss on sale of Borrower Loans as the net proceeds received on a loan sale is recorded in “Gain on Sale” whileless the fair value of the servicing rights, which isBorrower Loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and repurchase obligations.
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale and Interest Expense on Financial Instruments
Prosper recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale using the accrual method based on the degreestated interest rate to whichthe extent we believe it to be collectible. We record interest expense on the corresponding Notes, at Fair Value, Notes Issued by Securitization Trust, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Warehouse Lines based on the contractual loan servicing feeinterest rates.
Other Revenues
Other Revenues consist primarily of securitization fees and credit referral fees. Credit referral fees are where partner companies pay us an agreed upon amount for successful referrals of customers from our marketplace. The transaction price is abovea fixed amount per referral and is recognized by the Company upon a successful referral. Securitization fees represent fees Prosper earns to facilitate securitizations for purchasers of Borrower Loans and is recognized as “Other Revenues” when the securitization is completed.
As of December 31, 2021, Prosper had no contract assets, contract liabilities or below an estimated market servicing rate is recordeddeferred contract costs. As of December 31, 2021, Prosper had no unsatisfied performance obligations related to Transaction Fees or Other Revenues.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and are included in servicing assets or liabilities. Servicing assets“Sales and liabilities are recordedMarketing” expense in “Servicing Assets”the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prosper incurred advertising costs of $6.1 million, $6.8 million and “Other Liabilities,” respectively, on$32.8 million for the consolidated balance sheets.years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Prosper uses a discounted cash flow model to estimateStock-Based Compensation
Management determines the fair value of the loan servicing assets or liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that Prosper earnsCompany's stock options issued to employees on the Borrower Loans, estimated market servicing rates to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and the current principal balancesdate of the Borrower Loans.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans Held for Sale are comprised of Borrower Loans held and are recorded at fair value. The fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions similar to those of other Borrower Loans. We measure Loans Held for Sale at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful for the readers of the financial statements and it allows for the Loans Held for Sale to be measured at fair value similar to Borrower Loans and Notes.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of computer equipment, office furniture and equipment, leasehold improvements, software purchased or developed for internal use and web site development costs. Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, and are computedgrant using the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives of the assets are as follows:
Furniture and fixtures7 years
Office equipment5 years
Computers and equipment3 years
Leasehold improvements5-8 years
Software and website development costs1-5 years
The costs to develop software for the website and other internal uses are capitalized when management has authorized and committed project funding, preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, and itBlack-Scholes option pricing model, which is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Capitalized software and website development costs primarily include software licenses acquired, fees paid to outside consultants, and salaries and payroll related costs for employees directly involved in the development efforts.
Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria, together with costs incurred for training and maintenance, are expensed. Costs incurred for upgrades and enhancements that are considered to be probable to result in additional functionality are capitalized. Capitalized costs are included in property and equipment and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives. Software and website development assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measuredimpacted by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset group to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software and website development asset group.
Goodwill and Intangibles
F-14


Goodwill associated with business combinations is computedCommon Stock as well as by recognizing the portion of the purchase price that is not tied to individually identifiable and separately recognizable assets. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or whenever indications of impairment exist. Our annual impairment testing date is October 1. Impairment exists whenever the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Adverse changes in impairment indicators such as loss of key personnel, increased regulatory oversight, or unplanned changes in our operations could result in impairment. We didassumptions that include, but are not recognize any goodwill impairments duringlimited to, the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Costs of internally developing any intangibles is expensed as incurred. Intangible assets identified through the acquisitions of American Healthcare Lending and BillGuard include customer relationships, technology and a brand name. The customer relationship intangible assets are amortized on an accelerated basis over three to ten year periods. The technology and brand name intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis over three to five years and one year, respectively.  
Payable to Investors
Payable to investors primarily represents our obligation to investors related to cash held in an account for the benefit of investors and payments-in-process received from borrowers.
Debt
For debt instruments carried at amortized cost, the Company defers specific incremental costs directly related to issuing debt or entering into revolving debt arrangements. Debt issuance costs associated with revolving debt arrangements are presented on Prosper's Consolidated Balance Sheets as Prepaid and Other Assets and subsequently amortizedexpected Common Stock price volatility over the term of the revolving debt arrangement.
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock Warrant Liabilities
Freestanding warrants to acquire shares that may be redeemable are accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity "ASC" 480"). Under ASC 480, vested freestanding warrants to purchaseoption awards, the Company’s convertible redeemable preferred stock are classified as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets and carried at fair value because the warrants may conditionally obligate the Company to transfer assets at some point in the future. The Company initially measured the warrants at fair value on issuance. The warrants are subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date, and any change in their fair value is recognized as a component of change in fair value of convertible stock warrants, in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company will continue to adjust the liability for changes in fair value until the earlier of the exercise or expiration of the warrants, the completion of a deemed liquidation event, or the conversion of convertible redeemable preferred stock into common stock.

Loan Trailing Fee
On July 1, 2016, Prosper signed a series of agreements with WebBank which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the "Loan Trailing Fee") paid to WebBank in connection with the performance of each loan sold to Prosper. These agreements are effective as of August 1, 2016. The Loan Trailing Fee is dependent on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers of the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by Prosper, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interest in the performance of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by Prosper to WebBank over theexpected term of the respective loansawards, risk-free interest rates and the expected dividend yield.
PMI recognizes compensation expense for stock-based awards on a straight-line basis over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (the vesting period of the award). Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards expected to vest. PMI estimates future forfeitures at the date of grant and revises the estimates, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from estimates.
Stock-based awards issued to non-employees are marked-to-market up until the point that the awards measurement period has been achieved. Compensation expense for stock options issued to non-employees is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is a functionrecorded over the vesting period of the principal and interest payments made by borrowers of such loans. In the event that principal and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, Prosper is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to Prosper is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination of such loan within Other Liabilities and recorded as a reduction of Transaction Fees, net. Any changes in the fair value of this liability are recorded in Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net on the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates. 
Revenue Recognition
award.
F-15


Revenue primarily resultsIncome Taxes
The asset and liability method is used to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement carrying values and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Prosper’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within its provision for income taxes. U.S. Federal, California and other state income tax returns are filed. Prosper is not currently undergoing any income tax examinations. Due to the cumulative net operating loss, generally all tax years remain open.
Prosper recognizes benefits from transaction and servicing fees and netuncertain tax positions only if management believes that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement.
Other Income, Net
Other Income, Net includes interest income earned. Fees include transaction feesfrom Available for our services performed on behalfSale Investments, sublease income, SEC settlement costs and contract termination costs that are expected to be non-recurring and not part of WebBank to originate a loan. We also have other smaller sources of revenue reported as other revenue, including referral fees, securitization fees and subscription fees.restructuring activities.
Transaction Fees
Prosper has a customer contract with WebBank to facilitate the origination of all Borrower Loans through Prosper’s marketplace. In exchange for these services, Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank that is recognized when
performance is complete which isand upon the successful origination of a Borrower Loan and which is similar to the recognition
prior to the adoption of ASC 606.Loan. The transaction fee Prosper earns is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan that is facilitated on Prosper’s marketplace, and ranges from 1.00%1.0% to 5.00%5.0% of the original principal amount of sucheach Borrower Loan that WebBank originates.  Prosper records the transaction fee net of any fees paid to WebBank because Prosper does not receive an identifiable benefit from WebBank other than the Borrower Loanborrower loan that has been recognized at fair value.  
Servicing Fees
Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper typically pay Prosper a servicing fee which is currentlygenerally set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loanborrower loan prior to applying the current payment. Historically the servicing fee was set at 1.0% per annum and was increased to 1.075% per annum in August 2016 for loans originated after July 2016. The servicing fee compensates Prosper for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan,borrower loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records servicing feesServicing Fees from Investorsinvestors as a component of operating revenue when received.
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans
Prosper recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it is retained for the servicing of Borrower Loans by WebBank. Additionally, Prosper recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. GainsProsper measures gain or lossesloss on salessale of Borrower Loans that are recognized at the time of sale are determined by the difference betweenas the net sales proceeds fair value of any servicing rights retained andreceived on a sale less the carryingfair value of the Borrower Loans sold.
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans relates to warrants to purchase Series F Convertible Preferred Stock issued to the Consortium that vest when the Consortium purchases whole loans under the Consortium Purchase Agreement that was signed in February 2017. On vesting The net proceeds of the Series F warrants, Prosper records a liability as "Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability" onsale represent the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value and a corresponding amountof any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as "Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans" on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. ASC 505-50 "Share Based Payments to Non-Employees"addresses the accounting by both the grantor and the grantee for share-based payments made in exchange for goods and services. The counterparty to whom we issued the warrants is a customerpart of the Companytransaction, including, but not limited to whom we sell loans. Following the guidance in ASC 505-50, Prosper records the vesting of the warrants as contra-revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.Servicing Assets, retained securities, and repurchase obligations.
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale and Interest Expense on Notes and Warehouse LineFinancial Instruments
Prosper recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and interest expense on the corresponding NotesLoans Held for Sale using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper believeswe believe it to be collectable. Similarly, Prosper recognizes interest income on Loans Held for Sale andcollectible. We record interest expense on the corresponding Notes, at Fair Value, Notes Issued by Securitization Trust, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Warehouse Line using the accrual methodLines based on the statedcontractual interest rate to the extent Prosper believes it to be collectable.rates.
Other Revenues
Other Revenues consist primarily of securitization fees and credit referral fees. Credit referral fees are where partner companies pay us an agreed upon amount for successful referrals of customers from our marketplace. The transaction price is a fixed amount per referral and is recognized by the Company upon a successful referral which is similar to the recognition prior to the adoption of ASC 606.referral. Securitization fees represent fees Prosper earns to facilitate securitizations for purchasers of
F-16


Borrower Loans and is recognized as other revenue“Other Revenues” when the securitization is completed which is similar to the recognition prior to the adoption of ASC 606. In some instances Prosper may also provide a guarantee, which requires us to first determine the fair value of the guarantee and allocate the remaining transaction price to the securitization performance obligation.completed.
As of December 31, 20182021, Prosper had no contract assets, contract liabilities or deferred contract costs. As of December 31, 2018,2021, Prosper had no unsatisfied performance obligations related to transaction feesTransaction Fees or other revenues.Other Revenues.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and are included in sales“Sales and marketingMarketing” expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prosper incurred advertising costs of $48.0$6.1 million $66.9, $6.8 million and $48.1$32.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
We determineManagement determines the fair value of ourthe Company's stock options issued to employees on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is impacted by the fair value of our common stock,Common Stock as well as by changes in assumptions that include, but are not limited to, the expected common stockCommon Stock price volatility over the term of the option awards, the expected term of the awards, risk-free interest rates and the expected dividend yield.
We recognizePMI recognizes compensation expense for our stock basedstock-based awards on a straight-line basis over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (the vesting period of the award). Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards expected to vest. We estimatePMI estimates future forfeitures at the date of grant and reviserevises the estimates, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Stock-based awards issued to non-employees are marked-to-market up until the point that the awards measurement period has been achieved. Compensation expense for stock options issued to non-employees is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is recorded over the vesting period of the award.
Foreign Currency Transactions
F-15


The functional currency of our international subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. For this subsidiary, foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates and foreign currency denominated nonmonetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at historical exchange rates. Gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement and settlements are included in general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Income Taxes
The asset and liability method is used to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement carrying values and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Prosper’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within its provision for income taxes. U.S. Federal, Israel, California and other state income tax returns are filed. Prosper is not currently not undergoing any income tax examinations. Due to the cumulative net operating loss, generally all tax years remain open.
We recognizeProsper recognizes benefits from uncertain tax positions only if we believemanagement believes that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement.
Other Expenses, net
F-17


Income, Net
Other expenses, netIncome, Net includes interest income from availableAvailable for sale securities, accretion on available for sale securities, changes in fair value of contingent liabilities, proposedSale Investments, sublease income, SEC settlement costs realized gains and losses on the sale of available for sale securities, changes in fair value of convertible preferred stock warrant liabilities and contract termination costs that are expected to be non-recurring and not part of restructuring activities.
Restructuring Charges
Restructuring Charges consist of severance costs and contract termination-related costs and impairment charges associated with the severance actions. A liability for severance costs is typically recognized when the plan of termination has been communicated to the affected employees and is measured at its fair value at the communication date. Contract termination costs consist primarily of costs that will continue to be incurred under operating leases for their remaining terms without economic benefit to the Company. A liability for contract termination costs is recognized at the date the Company ceases using the rights conveyed by the lease contract and is recorded at fair value, which is determined based on the remaining contractual lease rentals reduced by estimated sublease rentals.
Comprehensive Income
Marketable debt securities are generally considered available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, based on quoted market prices or other readily available market information. Gains and losses are recognized when realized using the specific identification method and included in Other“Other Income, Net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which is reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ deficitStockholders’ Deficit in ourProsper's Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. If we havemanagement has determined that an other-than-temporary decline in fair value has occurred, the amount of the decline that is related to an identified loss is recognized in earnings. Prosper monitors its investment portfolio for potential impairment on a quarterly basis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Adopted In The Current PeriodYear
In May 2014, as part of its ongoing efforts to assist in the convergence of US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The new guidance sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed in US GAAP. The underlying principle of the new standard is that a business or other organization will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not addressed completely in the prior accounting guidance. Prosper adopted the requirements of the ASU as of January 1, 2018, utilizing the modified retrospective approach. Transaction fees, securitization fees and credit referral fees are included in the scope of the new guidance, while servicing fees, net interest income and gain or loss on the sale of loans remain within the scope of ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing or ASC topic 310. The impact of adopting the ASU did not result in a cumulative effect adjustment upon the date of adoption. Additionally, the impact of adoption on the consolidated financial statements for the current period is insignificant.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The standard provides guidance for eight targeted changes with respect to how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statements of cash flows, with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. Prosper adopted the standard effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Prosper’s consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, "Income2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers Other than Inventory (ASU 2016-16)," which requires companiesSimplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” This ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions related to the incremental approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the requirement to recognize or derecognize deferred tax liabilities related to equity method investments that are also foreign subsidiaries and the income-tax consequencesmethodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period. The guidance also clarifies and simplifies other aspects of an intra-entity transferthe accounting for income taxes, including a modification in the guidance for franchise taxes that are partially based on income and recognizing deferred taxes for a subsequent step-up in the tax basis of an asset other than inventory. Prospergoodwill. The ASU was effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2021. The Company has adopted ASU 2019-12 and concluded that the standard effective January 1, 2018, the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Prosper’sits consolidated financial statements.statements was immaterial.
Accounting Standards Issued, to be Adopted by the Company in Future Periods
In November 2016,March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, "StatementNo. 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848),” which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP on contract modifications and hedge accounting, in order to ease the financial reporting burdens of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU2016-18)," which requires companiesthe expected market transition from the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and other interbank offered rates to include amounts generally describedalternative referenced rates, such as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ProsperSecured Overnight Financing Rate. This ASU can be adopted after its issuance date through December 31, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating the standard effective January 1, 2018. Prosper had $149.1 million and $152.7 million of restricted cashimpact reference rate reform will have on its consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, whose cash flow statement classification changedcontracts that reference LIBOR in order to align with the newdetermine whether to adopt this guidance.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments See Note 10 - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Prosper adopted the standard effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Prosper’s consolidated financial statements.
Debt for more details.
F-18F-16


Accounting Standards Issued, To Be Adopted By The Company In Future PeriodsNOTE 3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures.  This guidance will be effective for us in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2019, and early adoption is permitted. In accordance with ASU 2018-11, "Leases (Topic 842), Target Improvements", Prosper has elected not to restate prior periods and will present the cumulative effect of applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on January 1, 2019. The standard will have a material impact on our consolidated balance sheets, but will not have a material impact on our consolidated statement of operations. The most significant impact will be the recognition of Right of Use ("ROU") assets and lease obligation liabilities for operating leases. Additionally, Prosper will record an impairment charge to its ROU asset upon adoption due to existing sublease arrangements that were entered into at a loss, which will be largely offset by the existing restructuring liability that exists under the legacy standard. Adoption of the standard will result in the recognition of additional ROU assets and lease obligation liabilities for operating leases of $16.1 million and $21.6 million, respectively, and a reduction in Other Liabilities of $5.5 million as of January 1, 2019.   
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment." The standard eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Prosper will continue to have the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The standard should be applied on a prospective basis. Prosper is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, "Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting."The ASU is intended to reduce the cost and complexity and to improve financial reporting for nonemployee share-based payments. The ASU expands the scope of Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation,which currently only includes share-based payments to employees, to include share-based payments issued to nonemployees for goods or services. Consequently, the accounting for share-based payments to nonemployees and employees will be substantially aligned. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year and early adoption is permitted, but may take place no earlier than a company’s adoption date of Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Prosper is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement." Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for level 3 fair value measurements. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, but entities are permitted to early adopt either the entire standard or only the provisions that eliminate or modify the requirements. Prosper is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract." This ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. Prosper is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.
3. Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment consist consists of the following at the dates presented (in thousands):
 December 31,
 20212020
Operating lease right-of-use assets$17,485 $15,767 
Computer equipment15,090 13,841 
Internal-use software and website development costs41,816 33,176 
Office equipment and furniture2,961 2,872 
Leasehold improvements7,167 7,167 
Assets not yet placed in service5,224 5,035 
Property and equipment89,743 77,858 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization(60,029)(49,412)
Total Property and Equipment, Net$29,714 $28,446 
F-19


 December 31,
 20182017
Property and equipment:  
Computer equipment$15,193 $14,499 
Internal-use software and website development costs22,505 19,910 
Office equipment and furniture3,015 3,010 
Leasehold improvements7,157 7,078 
Assets not yet placed in service2,745 1,216 
Property and equipment50,615 45,713 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(35,342)(27,577)
Total property and equipment, net$15,273 $18,136 
Depreciation and amortization expense for propertyProperty and equipmentEquipment for 2018, 2017the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 20162019 was $9.6$9.7 million $11.0, $8.1 million and $9.4$7.4 million, respectively. These expenses are included in "General and Administrative" expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prosper capitalized internal-use software and website development costs in the amount of $5.7$9.8 million, $3.7$8.3 million and $6.3$9.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Prosper recorded gainsWe recognized impairment of $0.4 million on disposalsour operating lease right-of-use assets related to vacant sublease space and the expected timing of $13 thousand and $11 thousand, and impairment charges of $1,083 thousandfinding new subtenants for the year ended December 31, 2020. Impairment was 0t material for years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016 respectively, as a result of our decision to discontinue several software and website development projects and to cease2019. Additionally, disclosures around the use of certain leased properties and related leasehold improvements, computer equipment and furniture at these locations.operating lease right-of-use assets are included in Note 16.
NOTE 4. Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Notes Held at Fair ValueBORROWER LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND NOTES, AT FAIR VALUE
The fair value of the Borrower Loans originated and Notes issued through the Note Channel is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default rates, prepayment rates and recoveries derived from historical performance, market conditions and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notesnotes is equal to the payments, if any, received on the corresponding Borrower Loan,borrower loan, net of the servicing fee. As such, the fair value of the Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently
F-17


disbursed to the Notenote holders. The effective interest rate associated with aany series of Notesnotes will be less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loanborrower loan due to the servicing fee.
Beginning in 2018,In 2019, Prosper Warehouse I Trust ("PWIT"), a wholly-owned subsidiarybegan refinancing the purchase of PMI, began purchasing unsecured consumer loans fromBorrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel through securitization transactions. Associated securitization trusts were deemed consolidated VIEs until September 2021, when the Company through a Warehouse arrangement with a national banking association. See Note "10. Debt" for more details. Similarsold its share of the residual certificates issued by these securitization trusts and deconsolidated the VIEs. Prior to their deconsolidation, the Borrower Loans originatedheld in the securitization trusts were included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 6 - Securitization for additional disclosure and Notes issued throughdetails on the Note Channel, thedeconsolidation of these securitization trust VIEs.
The fair value of theBorrower Loans Held for Sale is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value such Loans Held for Saleborrower loans include default and prepayment rates derived from historical performance market conditions and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit riskrates of each credit grade.return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
At December 31, 2018Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”) and 2017, Borrower Loans, Notes andProsper Warehouse II Trust (“PWIIT”), consolidated VIEs, purchase Loans Held for Sale (collectively “Warehouse Loans”) from the Company through warehouse arrangements with national banking associations and an asset manager. See Note 10 - Debt for more details. Prosper utilizes Warehouse Lines to finance Loans Held for Sale that may be subsequently contributed to securitization transactions or sold to investors. The fair value of the Loans Held for Sale is estimated using the same methodology as the one utilized for Borrower Loans valuation.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes were as follows (in thousands) were::
 Borrower LoansLoans Held for SaleNotes
 202120202021202020212020
Aggregate principal balance outstanding$265,232 $393,642 $242,278 $279,113 $267,415 $217,110 
Fair value adjustments2,394 (15,379)892 (4,492)(1,430)(8,731)
Fair value$267,626 $378,263 $243,170 $274,621 $265,985 $208,379 
 Borrower LoansNotesLoans Held for Sale
 December 31, 2018December 31, 2017December 31, 2018December 31, 2017December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Aggregate principal balance
   outstanding
$269,093 $296,668 $(272,430)$(300,922)$185,657 $59 
Fair value adjustments(5,571)(3,663)8,427 6,974 (1,869)(10)
Fair value$263,522 $293,005 $(264,003)$(293,948)$183,788 $49 
PMI has offered assistance to qualified borrowers who are facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These relief options include, among other things, the ability to delay up to four monthly loan payments, the ability to reduce minimum monthly payments for up to 12 months and extend the term of the loan by up to 11 months, and waived late and non-sufficient funds fees. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020, and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021.
Borrower Loans
AtOn September 27, 2021, Borrower Loans held by the securitization trusts consolidated by PMI as VIEs were removed from the balance sheet as part of the deconsolidation of those entities. Refer to Note 6 for additional details on this deconsolidation.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, outstanding Borrower Loans had original maturities betweenof either 36 andmonths or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92%31.82% and had various original maturity dates through December 2023.2026. At December 31, 2017,2020, outstanding Borrower Loans had original terms between 36 months and 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 32.32%31.82% and had various original maturity dates through December 2022.
F-20


Approximately $0.8 million and $1.7 million represents the loss that is attributable to changes in the instrument specific credit risks related to Borrower Loans that were recorded in the change in fair value during the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.2025.
As of December 31, 20182021, the Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $2.5$0.9 million and a fair value of $1.1$0.1 million. As of December 31, 20172020, the Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $3.5$2.8 million and a fair value of $1.3$0.3 million. We place loans on non-accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, Borrower Loans in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.3$0.1 million and $0.3$0.4 million, respectively.
Loans Held for Sale
AtAs of December 31, 2018,2021, outstanding Borrower Loans Held for Sale had original maturities between 36 months and 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and had various original maturity dates through December 2026. At December 31, 2020, outstanding Loans Held for Sale had original maturities between 36 months and 60 months had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and had various original maturity dates
F-18


through December 2023. Fair2025. value adjustments recorded in earnings on loans invested in by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2018 was a net loss of $1.9 million. Interest income earned on Loans Held for Sale by the Company was $32.6 million and $27.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 was $14.1 million. 2021 and 2020, respectively.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, Loans Held for Sale that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amount of $0.8 million and a fair value of $0.1 million. As of December 31, 2020, Loans Held for Sale that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amount of $0.8 million and a fair value of $0.3$0.1 million. We placePMI places loans on non-accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Loans Held for Sale in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.1 million (for both periods).
NOTE 5. Loan Servicing Assets and LiabilitiesSERVICING ASSETS
Prosper accounts for servicing assets and liabilitiesServicing Assets at their estimated fair values with changes in fair values recorded in servicing fees.Servicing Fees. The initial asset or liability is recognized when Prosper sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers through the Whole Loan Channel and the servicing rights are retained. The servicing assets and liabilitiesServicing Assets are measured at fair value throughout the servicing period. The total gains and losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans for the year ended December 31, 2018 were2021 was a gain of $13.1$7.2 million and a loss of $72.3 million from the Fair Value of Warrants Vestedrecognized in Gain on the Sale of Borrower Loans toon the Consortium.Consolidated Statement of Operations. The total gains and losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans for the year ended December 31, 2017 were2020 was a gain of $11.4$4.8 million and a loss of $60.1 million from the Fair Value of Warrants Vestedrecognized in Gain on the Sale of Borrower Loans toon the Consortium.Consolidated Statement of Operations. The total gains and losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans was $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019 were a gain of $10.9 million recognized in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans and a loss of $17.6 million recognized in Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
AtAs of December 31, 2018,2021, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.6$2.3 billion, original terms of either 36 months or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 35.52%31.82%, and various original maturity dates through December 2023.  At2026. As of December 31, 2017,2020, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.7$2.4 billion, original terms of either 36 months or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 35.52%31.82%, and various original maturity dates through December 2022.2025.
$43.1 million, $39.0 million and $38.9 million of contractually specifiedContractually-specified servicing fees and ancillary fees totaling $24.8 million, $28.9 million and $38.4 million are included on our consolidated statementsthe Consolidated Statements of operationsOperations in Servicing Fees, Net for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.  
Fair Value
Valuation Method – 
Prosper uses a discounted cash flow valuation methodology generally consisting of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discountingdiscounts those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the table within Note 7 below are those that Prosper considers significant to the estimated fair values of the levelLevel 3 servicing assets and liabilities.Servicing Assets. The following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.   
F-21


Market Servicing Rate – Prosper
Management estimates adequate market servicing rates that would fairly compensate a substitute servicer should one be required, which includes the profit that would be demanded in the marketplace. This rate is stated as a fixed percentage of outstanding principal balance on a per annum basis. Prosper estimated theseWith the assistance of a valuation specialist, management estimates market servicing rates based on observable market rates for other loan types in the industry and on observing bids from subservicingsub-servicing providers, adjusted for the unique loan attributes that are present in the specific loans that Prosper sells and services, and from information from a backup service provider.providers.
Discount Rate –
The discount rate is a rate of return used to discount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, which represents the fair value of the loan servicing rights. We usedManagement uses a range of discount rates for the servicing assets and liabilitiesServicing Assets based on comparable observed valuations of similar assets and publicly available disclosures related to servicing valuations, with comparability adjustments made to account for differences with Prosper’s servicing assets.Servicing Assets.
Default Rate
The default rate presented in Note 7 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e. risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional default rate curves for each credit grade or Borrower Loan
F-19


category. Each point on a particular Borrower Loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to default per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. The assumption regarding defaults directly reduces servicing revenues because the amount of servicing revenues received is based on the amount collected each period.
Prepayment Rate
The prepayment rate presented in Note 7 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e. risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional prepayment rate curves for each credit grade or Borrower Loan category. Each point on a particular Borrower Loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to prepay per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. Prepayments reduce servicing revenues as they shorten the period over which we expectProsper expects to collect fees on the Borrower Loans, which is used to project future servicing revenues.
NOTE 6. Available for Sale Investments,SECURITIZATIONS
Prosper did not co-sponsor any securitizations in 2020 or 2021. During 2019, Prosper co-sponsored securitizations of unsecured personal whole loans facilitated through our marketplace with outstanding principal balance of $573.0 million through three securitization trusts (PMIT 2019-1, PMIT 2019-2, and PMIT 2019-4) and retained a portion of the residual certificates in each securitization. Each securitization trust issued senior notes, a risk retention interest and residual certificates to finance the purchase of Borrower Loans. The risk retention interest represents the right to receive 5.0% of all amounts collected on the Borrower Loans held by the securitization trusts. The resulting senior notes were sold to third party investors. Prosper retained 65.5%, 16.4%, and 19.6% of the residual certificates issued by PMIT 2019-1, PMIT 2019-2, and PMIT 2019-4, respectively. The remaining residual certificates and all the risk retention interests were held by third-party investors. In addition to the retained residual certificates, Prosper's continued involvement includes loan servicing responsibilities over the life of the underlying loans.
PMIT 2019-1, 2019-2 and 2019-4 were deemed VIEs. Prosper consolidated the VIEs as the primary beneficiary because Prosper, through its role as the servicer, had both the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the VIEs' economic performance and a variable interest that could potentially be significant to the VIEs through holding the retained residual certificates. In evaluating whether Prosper was the primary beneficiary, management considered both qualitative and quantitative factors regarding the nature, size and form of the Company’s involvement with the VIEs. For these VIEs, the creditors have no recourse to the general credit of Prosper and the liabilities of the VIEs can only be settled by the respective VIEs' assets. Additionally, the assets of the VIEs can be used only to settle obligations of the VIEs. Because Prosper consolidated the securitization trusts, the loans held in the securitization trusts were included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value”, the notes sold to third party investors recorded in “Notes Issued by Securitization Trust”, and the risk retention interests and residual certificates held by third party investors in Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
AvailableManagement assesses whether Prosper is the primary beneficiary of its VIEs on an ongoing basis. On September 27, 2021, PMI sold its retained residual certificates issued by PMIT 2019-1, 2019-2 and 2019-4 to an unrelated third party for $4.1 million in cash. As a result of this sale, investments are recorded at fair valuemanagement determined that the Company was no longer the primary beneficiary of these entities as it no longer held a variable interest that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. Accordingly, the net assets of PMIT 2019-1, 2019-2 and unrealized gains and losses are reported, net2019-4 were deconsolidated from Prosper’s balance sheet on September 27, 2021, resulting in a loss on deconsolidation of taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in stockholders' equity unless management determines that an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value$1.5 million, consisting of available for sale investments as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, are as followsthe following (in thousands):
December 31, 2018Amortized CostGross Unrealized GainsGross Unrealized LossesFair Value
Fixed maturity securities:    
Treasury Bills$17,940 $— $(3)$17,937 
US Treasury securities4,246 — (10)4,236 
Total Available for Sale Investments$22,186 $— $(13)$22,173 

December 31, 2017Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value 
Fixed maturity securities:    
Treasury Bills$34,014 $— $(36)$33,978 
US Treasury securities$19,207 $— $(38)$19,169 
Total Available for Sale Investments $53,221 $— $(74)$53,147 
A summary of available for sale investments with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2018, aggregated by category and period of continuous unrealized loss, is as follows (in thousands):
PMIT 2019-1PMIT 2019-2PMIT 2019-4Total
Consideration received for residual certificates:
Cash$2,259 $836 $981 $4,076 
Net assets deconsolidated:
Restricted Cash$2,485 $4,324 $4,088 $10,897 
Borrower Loans (1)
15,133 29,989 33,239 78,361 
Notes Issued by Securitization Trust(13,022)(26,712)(29,975)(69,709)
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value (1)
(2,057)(5,990)(5,932)(13,979)
Total net assets deconsolidated$2,539 $1,611 $1,420 $5,570 
Total loss on deconsolidation$(280)$(775)$(439)$(1,494)
F-22F-20


 Less than 12 months12 months or longerTotal
 Fair ValueUnrealized LossesFair ValueUnrealized LossesFair ValueUnrealized Losses
Fixed maturity securities:      
Treasury Bills$17,937 $(3)$— $— $17,937 $(3)
US Treasury securities— — 4,236 (10)4,236 (10)
Total Investments with Unrealized Losses$17,937 $(3)4,236 $(10)$22,173 $(13)
(1) Because Borrower Loans and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust were measured at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, the balances above reflect the fair values of these financial instruments as of September 27, 2021, the deconsolidation date.
The maturitiesThis loss on deconsolidation is presented on the accompanying consolidated statement of available foroperations as “Loss on Deconsolidation of VIEs.” Prosper will continue to service the underlying borrower loans, but otherwise will have no continuing involvement with PMIT 2019-1, 2019-2 and 2019-4. In conjunction with the deconsolidation of the VIEs, the Company recognized Servicing Assets totaling $0.2 million, the impact of which is included in Servicing Fees, Net on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Consideration received from the sale investments at December 31, 2018, areof the residual certificates, net of Restricted Cash of $10.9 million retained by PMIT 2019-1, 2019-2 and 2019-4, is presented as follows (in thousands):
 Within 1 yearAfter 1 year through 5 yearsAfter 5 years to 10 yearsAfter 10 yearsTotal
Treasury Bills$17,937 $— $— $— $17,937 
US Treasury securities$4,236 $— $— $— $4,236 
Total Fair Value$22,173 $— $— $— $22,173 
Total Amortized Cost$22,186 $— $— $— $22,186 
Prosper did not sell any available for sale investments duringa financing activity on the year ended December 31, 2018.Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows, while the loss on deconsolidation is presented as an operating activity.
NOTE 7. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
For a description of the fair value hierarchy and Prosper’s fair value methodologies, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Prosper did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of levelLevel 3 during the year ended December 31, 2018.2021 or 2020.
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, servicing rights and Notesloan trailing fee liability are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used in the discounted cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Salemodel include default and Notes include defaultprepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade.
Investments held at fair value consist of available for sale investments.  The available for sale investments consist of US Treasury securities and Treasury Bills.  When available, Prosper uses quoted prices in active markets to measure the fair value of available for sale. When utilizing market data and bid-ask spreads, Prosper uses the price within the bid-ask spread that best represents fair value. When quoted prices do not exist, Prosper uses prices obtained from independent third-party pricing services to measure the fair value of investment assets. Prosper's primary independent pricing service provides prices based on observable trades and discounted cash flows that incorporate observable information, such as yields for similar types of securities (a benchmark interest rate plus observable spreads) and weighted-average maturity for the same or similar securities. ProsperThe Company compares the prices obtained from its primary independent pricing service to the prices obtained from the additional independent pricing services to determine if the price obtained from the primary independent pricing service is reasonable. ProsperThe Company does not adjust the prices received from independent third-party pricing services unless such prices are inconsistent with the definition of fair value and result in a material difference in the recorded amounts.
The Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability is valued using a Black Scholes-optionBlack-Scholes option pricing model. Refer to Note 12 for further details.additional information.
F-21


The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2021Level 1 InputsLevel 2 InputsLevel 3 InputsTotal
Assets:    
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value$— $— $267,626 $267,626 
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value— — 243,170 243,170 
Servicing Assets— — 8,761 8,761 
Total Assets$— $— $519,557 $519,557 
Liabilities:
Notes, at Fair Value$— $— $265,985 $265,985 
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability— — 250,941 250,941 
Loan Trailing Fee Liability (Note 9)— — 2,161 2,161 
Total Liabilities$— $— $519,087 $519,087 
F-23


December 31, 2018Level 1 InputsLevel 2 InputsLevel 3 InputsTotal
Assets:    
Borrower Loans$— $— $263,522 $263,522 
Loans Held for Sale— — 183,788 183,788 
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value— 22,173 — 22,173 
Servicing Assets— — 14,687 14,687 
Total Assets— 22,173 461,997 484,170 
Liabilities:    
Notes$— $— $264,003 $264,003 
Servicing Liabilities— — 12 12 
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability— — 143,679 143,679 
Loan Trailing Fee Liability— — 3,118 3,118 
Total Liabilities$— $— $410,812 $410,812 
Balance at December 31, 2020Level 1 InputsLevel 2 InputsLevel 3 InputsTotal
Assets:    
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value$— $— $378,263 $378,263 
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value— — 274,621 274,621 
Servicing Assets— — 9,242 9,242 
Total Assets$— $— $662,126 $662,126 
Liabilities:    
Notes, at Fair Value$— $— $208,379 $208,379 
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value— — 22,917 22,917 
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability— — 112,319 112,319 
Loan Trailing Fee Liability (Note 9)— — 2,233 2,233 
Total Liabilities$— $— $345,848 $345,848 

December 31, 2017Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total 
Assets:     
Borrower Loans$— $— $293,005 $293,005 
Loans Held for Sale— — 49 49 
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value— 53,147 — 53,147 
Servicing Assets— — 14,711 14,711 
Total Assets — 53,147 307,765 360,912 
Liabilities:     
Notes$— $— $293,948 $293,948 
Servicing Liabilities— — 59 59 
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability— — 116,366 116,366 
Loan Trailing Fee Liability— — 2,595 2,595 
Total Liabilities$— $— $412,968 $412,968 
As Prosper’sPMI’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, servicing assets and loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosperthe Company uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the levelLevel 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the levelLevel 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. Prosper did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of Level 3 for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following tables present quantitative information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper’s levelthe Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2018:2021 and 2020:
 December 31,
20212020
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Notes:
Discount rate4.2 %14.3 %4.5 %17.7 %
Default rate2.0 %14.1 %2.3 %17.9 %
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust:December 31, 2020
Discount rate3.3 %16.0 %
Default rate3.2 %15.3 %
Prepayment rate7.6 %35.4 %

Borrower Loans Loans Held for Saleheld in consolidated securitization trusts and Notes:
Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Discount rate4.7% - 13.8%4.0% - 14.4%
Default rate2.0% - 15.8%2.0% - 15.4%
Servicing Assets:the associated Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust
F-24F-22


 Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Discount rate15.0% - 25.0%15.0% - 25.0%
Default rate1.6% - 16.7%1.5% - 16.1%
Prepayment rate15.5% - 25.1%13.5% - 30.2%
Market servicing rate (1)
0.625 %0.625 %
were deconsolidated from the Company’s balance sheet as of September 27, 2021 (Note 6), and as a result the tables above exclude these financial instruments. Refer to the section below for information about the inputs used to measure the fair value of these Borrower Loans and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust.
(1) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 8 basis points and 7 basis points for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 70.5 basis points and 69.5 basis points respectively.
December 31,
20212020
Servicing Assets:
Discount rate15.0 %— 25.0 %15.0 %25.0 %
Default rate1.5 %— 14.1 %1.9 %17.7 %
Prepayment rate10.2 %— 32.3 %12.4 %28.9 %
Market servicing rate (1) (2)
0.648 %— 0.842 %0.625 %0.818 %
 (1) Servicing assets associated with loans enrolled in a relief program offered by the Company in response to the COVID-19 pandemic as of December 31, 2021 were measured using a market servicing rate assumption of 84.2 basis points. This rate was estimated using a multiplier consistent with observable market rates for other loan types, applied to the base market servicing rate assumption of 64.8 basis points.
(2) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 6 basis points and 7 basis points, respectively, for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 70.8 basis points to 90.2 basis points and 69.5 basis points to 88.8 basis points, respectively.
 December 31,

20212020
Loan Trailing Fee Liability:
Discount rate15.0 %— 25.0 %15.0 %— 25.0 %
Default rate1.5 %— 14.1 %1.9 %— 17.7 %
Prepayment rate10.2 %— 32.3 %12.4 %— 28.9 %
Loan Trailing Fee Liability:

Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Discount rate15.0% - 25.0%15.0% - 25.0%
Default rate1.6% - 16.7%1.5% - 16.1%
Prepayment rate15.5% - 25.1%13.5% - 30.2%
At December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans.
Deconsolidated Assets and Liabilities
As demonstrateddiscussed in Note 6, the Company deconsolidated its Borrower Loans held in securitization trusts and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust on September 27, 2021. The amounts deconsolidated for these financial instruments represent their estimated fair value on that date. Borrower Loan fair value measurements were determined using significant unobservable inputs, as described in the previous section. Key assumptions for the valuation of Borrower Loans are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):
Borrower LoansSeptember 27, 2021
Fair value, using the following assumptions:$78,361 
Weighted-average discount rate9.26 %
Weighted-average default rate8.13 %
Because the residual certificates held by the Company were sold in a market transaction to an unrelated third party, it was determined that the sales price was a fair representation of their fair value. Market assumptions were derived from the sale
F-23


and utilized to estimate the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due torisk retention interests as well. Key assumptions for the borrower payment dependent designvaluation of Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust are presented in the Notesfollowing table (in thousands, except percentages):
Certificates Issued by Securitization TrustSeptember 27, 2021
Fair value, using the following assumptions:$13,979 
Weighted-average discount rate7.99 %
Weighted-average default rate7.68 %
Weighted-average prepayment rate17.94 %
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Assets and because the principal balances of the Borrower Loans approximated the principal balances of the Notes.Liabilities on a Recurring Basis
The following tables presenttable presents additional information about the levelLevel 3 Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans, Notes and NotesCertificates Issued by Securitization Trust measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands): 
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Borrower
Loans
Notes
Loans Held
for Sale
TotalAssetsLiabilities
Balance at January 1, 2018$293,005 $(293,948)$49 $(894)
Borrower
Loans
Loans Held
for Sale
NotesCertificates Issued by Securitization TrustTotal
Fair Value at January 1, 2020Fair Value at January 1, 2020$634,019 $142,026 $(244,171)$(52,168)$479,706 
Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of NotesPurchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes177,101 (176,830)2,365,431 2,365,702 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes133,644 1,338,082 (133,228)— 1,338,498 
Principal repaymentsPrincipal repayments(171,427)175,760 (43,169)(38,836)Principal repayments(332,629)(104,798)149,409 22,136 (265,882)
Borrower Loans sold to third partiesBorrower Loans sold to third parties(3,690)— (2,135,329)(2,139,019)Borrower Loans sold to third parties(6,731)(1,089,974)— — (1,096,705)
Other changesOther changes(202)441 1,422 1,661 Other changes(1,420)1,168 (53)436 131 
Change in fair valueChange in fair value(31,265)30,574 (4,616)(5,307)Change in fair value(48,620)(11,883)19,664 6,679 (34,160)
Balance at December 31, 2018$263,522 $(264,003)$183,788 $183,307 
Fair Value at December 31, 2020Fair Value at December 31, 2020378,263 274,621 (208,379)(22,917)421,588 
Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of NotesPurchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes232,000 1,712,705 (231,933)— 1,712,772 
Principal repaymentsPrincipal repayments(260,689)(164,165)172,250 14,934 (237,670)
Borrower Loans sold to third partiesBorrower Loans sold to third parties(2,664)(1,580,164)— — (1,582,828)
Other changesOther changes(1,518)(249)167 113 (1,487)
Change in fair valueChange in fair value595 422 1,910 (6,110)(3,183)
Deconsolidation of VIEs (Note 6)Deconsolidation of VIEs (Note 6)(78,361)— — 13,980 (64,381)
Fair Value at December 31, 2021Fair Value at December 31, 2021$267,626 $243,170 $(265,985)$— $244,811 

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Borrower
Loans
Notes
Loans Held
for Sale
Total
Balance at January 1, 2017$315,627 $(316,236)$624 $15 
Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes194,887 (194,391)2,619,130 2,619,626 
Principal repayments(188,199)191,828 (89)3,540 
Borrower Loans sold to third parties(3,855)— (2,619,620)(2,623,475)
Other changes97 (180)(3)(86)
Change in fair value(25,552)25,031 (514)
Balance at December 31, 2017$293,005 $(293,948)$49 $(894)
F-25


The following table presents additional information about the levelLevel 3 servicing assetsServicing Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
Servicing
Assets
Fair Value at January 1, 20172020$12,78612,602 
Additions14,1385,829 
Less: Changes in fair value(12,213)(9,189)
Fair Value at December 31, 20172020$14,7119,242 
Additions13,1717,973 
Recognition of Servicing Assets upon deconsolidation of VIEs (Note 6)215 
Less: ChangesChange in fair value(13,195)(8,669)
Fair Value at December 31, 20182021$14,6878,761 

F-24


The following table presentstables present additional information about levelLevel 3 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability
Balance as ofFair Value at January 1, 20172020$21,711149,996 
Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant65,516 
Change in fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability29,139 (37,677)
Fair Value at Balance at December 31, 20172020$116,366112,319 
Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant72,316 
Change in fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability(45,003)138,622 
Fair Value at Balance at December 31, 20182021$143,679250,941 
Loan Trailing Fee
The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaultsdefault rates using a discounted cash flow model. The assumptions used are the same as those used for the valuation of Servicing Assets, as described below.
The following table presents additional information about levelLevel 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
Balance as ofat January 1, 20172020$6652,997 
Issuances2,6311,349 
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(956)(2,421)
Change in fair value$308 255 
Balance at December 31, 20172020$2,5952,233 
Issuances2,5241,775 
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(2,494)(2,100)
Change in fair value493253 
Balance at December 31, 20182021$3,1182,161 











F-25


Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity
Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 20182021 and 2020 for Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale and Notes funded through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):.
Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale:December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
Fair value, using the following assumptions:$510,796 $652,884 
     Weighted-average discount rate5.64 %8.26 %
     Weighted-average default rate10.08 %11.58 %
Fair value resulting from:  
100 basis point increase in discount rate$505,732  $647,093 
200 basis point increase in discount rate$500,763  $641,437 
Fair value resulting from:  
100 basis point decrease in discount rate$516,064  $658,817 
200 basis point decrease in discount rate$521,437  $664,895 
Fair value resulting from:  
100 basis point increase in default rate$506,362  $646,421 
200 basis point increase in default rate$501,921  $639,987 
Fair value resulting from:  
100 basis point decrease in default rate$515,326  $659,377 
200 basis point decrease in default rate$519,851  $665,904 

Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 2021 and 2020 for Notes are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages).
Notes:December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
Fair value, using the following assumptions:$265,985 $208,379 
     Weighted-average discount rate5.76 %8.93 %
     Weighted-average default rate10.70 %12.26 %
Fair value resulting from: 
100 basis point increase in discount rate$263,326  $206,528 
200 basis point increase in discount rate$260,735  $204,720 
Fair value resulting from: 
100 basis point decrease in discount rate$268,714  $210,274 
200 basis point decrease in discount rate$271,516  $212,217 
Fair value resulting from: 
100 basis point increase in default rate$263,644  $206,304 
200 basis point increase in default rate$261,318  $204,238 
Fair value resulting from: 
100 basis point decrease in default rate$268,340  $210,463 
200 basis point decrease in default rate$270,711  $212,558 



F-26


 Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale Notes 
Fair Value at December 31, 2018$447,310 $264,003 
Discount rate assumption:8.34 %*8.34 %*
Resulting fair value from:    
100 basis point increase$443,062  $261,492  
200 basis point increase438,917  259,041  
Resulting fair value from:    
100 basis point decrease$451,663  $266,576  
200 basis point decrease456,127  269,215  
Default rate assumption:13.02 %*13.02 %*
Resulting fair value from:    
100 basis point increase$441,790  $260,729  
200 basis point increase436,460  257,568  
Resulting fair value from:    
100 basis point decrease$452,873  $267,303  
200 basis point decrease458,479  270,629  
* Represents weighted averageKey economic assumptions considering all credit grades.
The following table presentsand the estimated impact on Prosper’s estimatedsensitivity of the fair value of servicing assets, calculated using different market servicing rates and different default rates as ofto immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 20182021 and 2020 for Servicing Assets is presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages).
Servicing Assets:December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Fair value, using the following assumptions:$8,761 $9,242 
     Weighted-average market servicing rate0.650 %0.631 %
     Weighted-average prepayment rate20.82 %19.84 %
     Weighted-average default rate12.54 %12.78 %
Fair value resulting from:
Market servicing rate increase of 0.025%$8,203 $8,689 
Market servicing rate decrease of 0.025%$9,320 $9,796 
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate$8,568 $9,064 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate$8,957 $9,423 
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate$8,646 $9,116 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate$8,878 $9,369 

Servicing
Assets
Fair Value at December 31, 2018$14,687 
Market servicing rate assumptions0.625 %
Resulting fair value from:
Market servicing rate increase to 0.65%$13,781 
Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60%$15,593 
Weighted average prepayment assumptions20.08 %
Resulting fair value from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate$14,514 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate$14,862 
Weighted average default assumptions12.63 %
Resulting fair value from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate$14,513 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate$14,865 
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other
F-27


assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects.
F-27


Financial Instruments, Assets and Liabilities notNot Recorded at Fair Value
The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for financial instruments, assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2021Carrying AmountLevel 1 InputsLevel 2 InputsLevel 3 InputsFair Value
Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents$67,700 $67,700 $— $— $67,700 
Restricted Cash - Cash and Cash Equivalents163,047 163,047 — — 163,047 
Restricted Cash - Certificates of Deposit4,878 — 4,878 — 4,878 
Accounts Receivable1,054 — 1,054 — 1,054 
Total Assets$236,679 $230,747 $5,932 $— $236,679 
Liabilities:
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$25,790 $— $25,790 $— $25,790 
Payable to Investors152,794 — 152,794 — 152,794 
Warehouse Lines209,275 — 211,177 — 211,177 
Paycheck Protection Program loan (Note 9)8,590 — 8,556 — 8,556 
Total Liabilities$396,449 $— $398,317 $— $398,317 
December 31, 2018Carrying Amount Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Fair Value 
Balance at December 31, 2020Balance at December 31, 2020Carrying AmountLevel 1 InputsLevel 2 InputsLevel 3 InputsFair Value
Assets: Assets: Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and Cash Equivalents $57,945 $57,945 $— $— $57,945 Cash and Cash Equivalents$50,145 $50,145 $— $— $50,145 
Restricted Cash 149,114 — 149,114 — 149,114 
Restricted Cash - Cash and Cash EquivalentsRestricted Cash - Cash and Cash Equivalents158,846 158,846 — — 158,846 
Restricted Cash - Certificates of DepositRestricted Cash - Certificates of Deposit4,877 — 4,877 — 4,877 
Accounts Receivable Accounts Receivable 5,119 — 5,119 — 5,119 Accounts Receivable605 — 605 — 605 
Total Assets Total Assets 212,178 57,945 154,233 — 212,178 Total Assets$214,473 $208,991 $5,482 $— $214,473 
Liabilities: Liabilities: Liabilities:
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $19,967 $— $19,967 $— $19,967 Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$17,876 $— $17,876 $— $17,876 
Payable to Investors Payable to Investors 127,538 — 127,538 — 127,538 Payable to Investors124,094 — 124,094 — 124,094 
Warehouse Line 162,488 — 162,488 — 162,488 
Notes Issued by Securitization TrustNotes Issued by Securitization Trust156,782 — 158,951 — 158,951 
Warehouse LinesWarehouse Lines242,479 — 242,261 — 242,261 
Paycheck Protection Program loan (Note 9)Paycheck Protection Program loan (Note 9)8,505 — 8,540 — 8,540 
Total Liabilities Total Liabilities $309,993 $— $309,993 $— $309,993 Total Liabilities$549,736 $— $551,722 $— $551,722 

December 31, 2017Carrying Amount Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Fair Value 
Assets: 
Cash and Cash Equivalents $45,795 $45,795 $— $— $45,795 
Restricted Cash 152,668 — 152,668 — 152,668 
Accounts Receivable 683 — 683 — 683 
Total Assets 199,146 45,795 153,351 — 199,146 
Liabilities: 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $11,942 $— $11,942 $— $11,942 
Payable to Investors 132,432 — 132,432 — 132,432 
Total Liabilities 144,374 — 144,374 — 144,374 
The estimated fair values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities and Payable to Investors approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.
F-28


NOTE 8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, NetGOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Goodwill
Prosper’s goodwillGoodwill balance of $36.4 million at December 31, 20182021 did not change during the year ended December 31, 2018. We did not record any goodwill2021. The Company recorded no Goodwill impairment expense for the yearyears ended December 31, 2018.2021, 2020 and 2019.
Other Intangible Assets, Net
The following table presents the detail of other intangible assets forIntangible Assets subject to amortization as of the periods presentedfollowing dates (dollars in thousands):

December 31, 2021
Gross
Carrying Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying Value
Remaining
Useful Life
(In Years)
Developed technology$3,060 $(3,060)$— — 
User base and customer relationships5,050 (4,722)328 3.3
Brand name60 (60)— — 
Total Intangible Assets subject to amortization$8,170 $(7,842)$328 
December 31, 2018December 31, 2020
Gross
Carrying Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying Value
Remaining
Useful Life
(In Years)
Gross
Carrying Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying Value
Remaining
Useful Life
(In Years)
Developed technologyDeveloped technology$3,060 $(3,060)$— 0Developed technology$3,060 $(3,060)$— — 
User base and customer relationshipsUser base and customer relationships5,050 (4,051)999 6.3User base and customer relationships5,050 (4,550)500 4.3
Brand nameBrand name60 (60)— 0Brand name60 (60)— — 
Total intangible assets subject to amortization$8,170 $(7,171)$999 
Total Intangible Assets subject to amortizationTotal Intangible Assets subject to amortization$8,170 $(7,670)$500 

F-28


 December 31, 2017
 
Gross
Carrying Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying Value
Remaining
Useful Life
(In Years)
Developed technology$3,060 $(3,038)$22 0.3
User base and customer relationships5,050 (3,695)1,355 7.3
Brand name60 (60)— 0
Total intangible assets subject to amortization$8,170 $(6,793)$1,377  
We did not record any intangible additionsThe Company recorded no additional intangibles for the year ended December 31, 20182021 or 2017.
The user base and customer relationship intangible assets are being amortized on an accelerated basis over a three to ten years period. The technology and brand name intangible assets are being amortized on a straight line basis over three to five years and one year, respectively.2020. For the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 2018 we did not record any2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded no intangible asset impairment expense. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, certain intangible assets were made available for sale and as a result they were written down to fair value. This resulted in a $6.4 million impairment loss, which is recorded in Other Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.impairment.
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 was $0.4$0.2 million, $1.4$0.2 million and $3.8$0.3 million, respectively. Estimated amortization of purchased intangible assetsIntangible Assets for future periods is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending Year Ending December 31, 
2019279 
2020220 
2021172 
2022136 
2023107 
Thereafter85 
Total$999 
Amounts
Years Ending December 31,
2022$136 
2023107 
202485 
Thereafter— 
Total Amortization Expenses$328 

9. Other Liabilities
Other Liabilities includes the following (in thousands):
 Year Ending December 31,
 20182017
Loan trailing fee3,118 2,595 
Deferred revenue396 452 
Servicing liabilities12 59 
Deferred income tax liability373 225 
Deferred rent3,408 3,904 
Restructuring liability2,106 3,355 
Other1,216 2,079 
Total Other Liabilities$10,629 $12,669 

F-29


NOTE 9. OTHER LIABILITIES
Other Liabilities consists of the following (in thousands):
 December 31,
 20212020
Operating lease liabilities$11,026 $13,342 
Paycheck Protection Program loan (Note 10)8,590 8,505 
Loan trailing fee liability2,161 2,233 
Deferred revenue1,196 63 
Deferred income tax liability560 489 
Financing lease liabilities78 — 
Other289 425 
Total Other Liabilities$23,900 $25,057 

Additionally, disclosures around the operating lease liabilities are included in Note 16.
NOTE 10. DebtDEBT
Warehouse Line
On January 19, 2018, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Prosper Warehouse I Trust ("PWIT"Agreements
Prosper’s consolidated VIEs, PWIT and PWIIT (together, “Warehouse VIEs”), Prospereach entered into an agreement (the "Warehouse Agreement"(together, “Warehouse Agreements”) with certain lenders for a committed revolving linelines of credit (the "Warehouse Line"(“Warehouse Lines”). during 2018 and 2019, respectively. In connection with the Warehouse Agreement, PWITAgreements, the Warehouse VIEs each entered into a security agreement with a bank as administrative agent and a national banking association as collateral trustee and paying agent. Proceeds under the Warehouse LineLines may only be used to purchase certain unsecured consumerpersonal loans and related rights and documents from the CompanyProsper and to pay fees and expenses related to the Warehouse Line. Effective June 12, 2018Lines. Both Warehouse VIEs are consolidated because Prosper is the Warehouse Agreement was amended.primary beneficiary of the VIEs. The amendments included increasingassets of the committed lineVIEs can be used only to settle obligations of credit from $100 million to $200 million, extending the termVIEs. Additionally, the creditors of the Warehouse line (includingLines have no recourse to the final maturity date), amending the monthly unused commitment fee, and reducing the rate at whichgeneral credit of Prosper. The loans held in the Warehouse Line bears interest.VIEs are included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” and Warehouse Lines are in “Warehouse Lines” in the consolidated balance sheets.
Under
Both Warehouse Agreements contain the amended agreement, proceeds of loans made under the Warehouse Line may be borrowed, repaid, and reborrowed until the earlier of June 12, 2020 and the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default. Repayment of any outstanding proceeds will be made over the 24 month period ending June 12, 2022, excluding the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default.
Under the amended agreement, the Warehouse Line bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 3.00% and has an advance rate of 89%. Additionally, the Warehouse Line bears a monthly unused commitment fee, depending on utilization, of 0.50% or 0.75% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the Warehouse Line.
The Warehouse Agreement containssame certain covenants applicable to PWIT, including restrictions on PWIT’seach Warehouse VIE's ability to incur indebtedness, pledge assets, merge or consolidate and enter into certain affiliate transactions. TheEach Warehouse LineAgreement also requires Prosper to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $25 million, minimum net liquidity of $15 million and a maximum leverage ratio of 5:1. Tangible net worth is defined as the sum of (i) (A) convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, (B) total stockholders’ deficitStockholders’ Deficit and (C) convertible preferred stock warrant liability,Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, less the sum of (ii) (A) goodwill and (B) intangible assets. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of cash, cash equivalents and availableAvailable for sale investments.Sale Investments. The leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of total consolidated indebtedness other than non-recourse securitization indebtedness, non-recourse or limited recourse warehouse indebtedness and borrower dependent notes, to tangible net worth. As of December 31, 2018,2021, Prosper was in compliance with the covenants under each Warehouse Agreement.
PWIT Warehouse Line
On January 19, 2018, through PWIT, Prosper entered into a Warehouse Agreement for a Warehouse Line. Effective June 12, 2018, the Warehouse Agreement.Agreement was amended. The amendments included increasing the committed line of credit from $100 million to $200 million, extending the term of the PWIT Warehouse Line (including the final maturity date), amending the monthly unused commitment fee and reducing the rate at which the PWIT Warehouse Line bears interest.
Subsequently the Warehouse Agreement was amended on June 20, 2019 to extend the facility, to reduce the interest rate and unused commitment fee and to expand the eligibility criteria for unsecured personal loans that can be financed through the PWIT Warehouse Line. The Warehouse Agreement was amended again on May 19, 2021 to extend the facility, to reduce the interest and advance rates and to include provisions for an alternative benchmark rate in light of the ongoing phaseout of LIBOR.
Under the amended agreement, proceeds of loans made under the PWIT Warehouse Line may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until the earlier of June 20, 2023 or the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default. Repayment of any outstanding proceeds will be made over the 24 month period ending June 20, 2025, excluding the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default.
F-30


Under the amended agreement, the PWIT Warehouse Line bears interest at a rate of an established benchmark rate (currently LIBOR) plus 2.75% and has an advance rate of 87%. Additionally, the PWIT Warehouse Line bears a monthly unused commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the PWIT Warehouse Line.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, Prosper had $162.5$96.6 million in debt outstanding and accrued interest outstanding under the PWIT Warehouse Line. This debt is secured by an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $184.2$113.6 million included in "LoansLoans Held for Sale, at Fair Value"Value on the consolidated balance sheet. AtConsolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 20182021 the undrawn portion available under the Warehouse Line was $38.2$103.4 million. Prosper incurred $1.6$0.3 million of capitalizeddeferred debt issuance costs for the amendment signed on May 19, 2021, which are included in Prepaids and Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be recognized asamortized to interest expense through June 12, 2022.over the term of the revolving arrangement.
Prosper has also purchased a swaption to limit ourthe Company's exposure to increases in LIBOR. The swaptions are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value in Prepaids and Other Assets. Any changes in the fair value are recorded in the Change in Fair Value of Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes,Financial Instruments, Net on the consolidated statementConsolidated Statement of operations.Operations. The fair value of the swaption was not material atas of December 31, 2018.2021.
PWIIT Warehouse Line
On March 28, 2019, through PWIIT, Prosper entered into a second Warehouse Agreement for a $300 million Warehouse Line with a national banking association different than that of PWIT.
On March 4, 2021, PMI extended its $300 million PWIIT Warehouse Line (“PWIIT Extension”). The PWIIT Extension consists of a $230 million Class A loan with the existing PWIIT Warehouse Line national banking association and a $70 million Class B loan with an asset manager. The advance rate on the PWIIT Extension is 90%. Under the PWIIT Extension, proceeds of loans made under the PWIIT Warehouse Line may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until the earlier of March 3, 2023 or the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default. Repayment of any outstanding proceeds will be made over a 24-month period ending March 4, 2025, excluding the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default.
Under the PWIIT Extension, the Class A loan bears interest at a rate of the national banking association's asset-backed commercial paper rate, plus a spread of 2.05%. The spread increases by 0.375% during the first 12 months immediately following the termination of the revolving period with an additional increase of 0.75% thereafter. Additionally, the Class A loan bears a monthly unused commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the Class A loan.
The Class B loan bears interest at a rate of one-month LIBOR, plus a spread of 8.75%. The spread increases by 0.375% during the first twelve months immediately following the termination of the revolving period with an additional increase of 0.75% thereafter. Additionally, the Class B loan bears a monthly unused commitment fee of 0.50% or 1.00% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the Class B loan, depending on the Class B loan utilization percentage.
As of December 31, 2021, Prosper had $112.7 million in debt and accrued interest outstanding under the PWIIT Warehouse Line. This debt is secured by an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $126.8 million included in Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2021 the undrawn portion available under the PWIIT Warehouse Line was $187.3 million. Prosper incurred $1.3 million of deferred debt issuance costs for the extension in March 2021, which are included in “Prepaids and Other Assets” and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the revolving arrangement.
Phaseout of LIBOR
A portion of the interest rate charged on our Warehouse Lines is currently based on LIBOR. LIBOR has been the subject of reform and was expected to phase out by the end of fiscal 2021; however, on November 30, 2020, the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“ICE”) announced plans to delay the phase out of LIBOR to June 30, 2023. The consequences of the discontinuation of LIBOR cannot be entirely predicted but could impact the interest expense incurred on these debt instruments. We have negotiated alternatives to LIBOR on the PWIT and PWIIT Warehouse Lines, which we may renegotiate before LIBOR ceases to be a widely available reference rate.
Paycheck Protection Program Loan
The Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) and sponsored by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”), provides small businesses – sole proprietors, independent contractors, and, with certain industry exceptions, businesses with fewer than 500 employees – the opportunity to apply for a loan of up to $10 million to cover up to 24 weeks (the “covered period”) of payroll costs, including benefits. Funds may also be used to cover interest on mortgage obligations, leases, and utilities incurred or in place before February 15, 2020. PPP loan payments are deferred, and based on SBA guidance, will be forgiven as long as (i) loan proceeds
F-31


are used for covered expenses, (ii) full-time employee headcount is maintained during the eight-week period covered by the PPP loan and (iii) compensation for employees who earned less than $100,000 on an annualized basis in 2019 is not reduced by more than 25% during the covered period. For purposes of calculating maximum loan eligibility, payroll costs per employee are capped at $100,000 on an annualized basis.
In April 2020, the Company obtained an $8.4 million loan under the PPP. The loan accrued interest at 1 percent per annum and had a two-year term through April 2022, with payments deferred until such time as an approval or denial of forgiveness is received from the SBA. The Company used the PPP Loan proceeds to cover payroll costs, rent and utilities in accordance with the relevant terms and conditions of the CARES Act. As of December 31, 2021, principal and interest outstanding under the PPP loan totaled $8.6 million and is included in Other Liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. PMI formally applied for forgiveness with the lender and the SBA. On March 21, 2022, the Company was notified by the SBA that all principal and interest under the loan, totaling $8.6 million, was forgiven in full through a forgiveness payment made on March 15, 2022 by the SBA to the lender of the PPP loan.
NOTE 11. Net Loss Per ShareNET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
ProsperPMI computes its net lossincome (loss) per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC Topic 260”). Under ASC Topic 260, basic net lossincome (loss) per share is computed by dividing net lossincome (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and excludes the effects of any potentially dilutive securities.
We compute EarningsPMI’s net income (loss) per Share (“EPS”)share is calculated using the two-class method.method in accordance with ASC Topic 260. The two-class method allocates earnings that otherwise would have been available to common shareholders to holders of participating securities. We considerManagement considers all series of our convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock to be participating securities due to their rights to participate in dividends with common stock.Common Stock. As such, earnings allocated to these participating securities, which include participation rights in undistributed earnings, are subtracted from net income to determine total undistributed earnings to be allocated to common stockholders.
All participating
F-30


securities are excluded from basic weighted-average common shares outstanding. Prior to any conversion to common shares, each series of PMI’s convertible preferred stock wasProsper’s Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to participate on an if convertedif-converted basis in distributions of earnings, when and if declared by the board of directors, that wereare made to common stockholders and as a resultconsequently, these shares were considered participating securities. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, certain shares issued as a result of the early exercise of stock options which are subject to a repurchase right by PMI were entitled to receive non-forfeitable dividends during the vesting period and as a result wereconsequently, are considered participating securities.
The weighted average shares used in calculating basic and diluted net lossincome (loss) per share excludes certain shares that are disclosed as outstanding shares in the consolidated balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets because such shares are restricted as they were associated with options that were early exercised and continue to remain unvested.

F-32


Basic and diluted net lossincome (loss) per share waswere calculated as follows:follows for the periods presented (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
 Year ended December 31,
 201820172016
Numerator:  
Net loss available to common stockholders for basic and diluted EPS$(39,945)$(115,158)$(118,741)
Denominator:  
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and
   diluted net loss per share
70,384,501 69,687,836 64,196,537 
Basic and diluted net loss per share$(0.57)$(1.65)$(1.85)
December 31,
 202120202019
Numerator:  
Net (Loss) Income$(138,341)$18,551 $(13,711)
Plus: Return on Share Purchase— 2,381 1,066 
Less: Net Income Allocated to Participating Securities— (15,172)— 
Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Common Stockholders$(138,341)$5,760 $(12,645)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share70,767,275 68,592,557 70,511,605 
Effect of dilutive securities:
     Stock options— 24,816,184 — 
     Convertible preferred stock warrants— 213,264,845 — 
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share - diluted70,767,275 306,673,586 70,511,605 
Net (Loss) Income Per Share – Basic$(1.95)$0.08 $(0.18)
Net (Loss) Income Per Share – Diluted$(1.95)$0.02 $(0.18)

The following common stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted net lossincome (loss) per share for the periods presented because including them would have been anti-dilutive:anti-dilutive (number of shares):
 Year ended December 31,
 201820172016
 (shares)(shares)(shares)
Excluded securities:  
Convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding214,637,925 214,637,925 177,388,425 
Stock options issued and outstanding69,023,373 46,722,408 44,099,577 
Unvested stock options exercised— 11,565 1,126,210 
Restricted Stock Units— — 351,721 
Warrants issued and outstanding1,081,630 1,166,145 988,513 
Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock warrants35,544,141 35,544,141 1,254,111 
Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrants177,720,704 177,720,704 — 
Total common stock equivalents excluded from diluted
   net loss per common share computation
498,007,773 475,802,888 225,208,557 
 December 31,
 202120202019
Excluded Securities:  
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding158,365,655 158,365,655 209,613,570 
Stock options issued and outstanding72,756,708 48,265,056 73,851,862 
Warrants issued and outstanding1,080,349 1,080,349 1,080,349 
Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock warrants35,544,141 — 35,544,141 
Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrants177,720,704 — 177,720,704 
Total Excluded Securities445,467,557 207,711,060 497,810,626 
The number of shares issued and outstanding reflect a 5-for-1 forward stock split effected by PMI on February 16, 2016.
F-33


NOTE 12. Convertible Preferred Stock, Warrant Liability and Stockholders’ DeficitCONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK WARRANT LIABILITY AND COMMON STOCK
Convertible Preferred Stock
Under PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, preferred stock is issuable in series and the Board of Directors is authorized to determine the rights, preferences, and terms of each series.
In January 2013, PMI issued and sold 69,340,760 shares of New Series A (“New Series A”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.29 per share for $19.8 million, net of issuance costs. In connection with that sale, PMI issued 25,585,910 shares at par value $0.01 per share of Series A-1 (“Series A-1”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock to the holders of shares of PMI’s convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock that was outstanding immediately prior to the sale (“Old Preferred
F-31


Shares”) in consideration for such stockholders participating in the sale. In connection with the New Series A sale, Old Preferred Shares were converted into shares of common stockCommon Stock at a ratio of 1:1 if the holder of the Old Preferred Shares participated in the New Series A sale or at a 10:1 ratio if the holder of the Old Preferred Shares did not so participate. In addition, each such participating holder received a share of New Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock for every dollar of liquidation preference associated with an Old Preferred Share held by such holder. Each share of Series A-1 preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $2.00 and converts into common stockCommon Stock at a ratio of 1,000,000:1. The New Series A and Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.
In September 2013, PMI issued and sold 41,443,670 shares of New Series B (“New Series B”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.60 per share for approximately $24.9 million, net of issuance costs. The New Series B convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.
In May 2014, PMI issued and sold 24,404,770 shares of New Series C (“New Series C”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $2.87 per share for approximately $69.9 million, net of issuance costs. The Series C convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purpose of the New Series C private placement was to raise funds for general corporate needs and for the tender offer discussed below.
On June 18, 2014, PMI issued a Tender Offer Statement to purchase up to 6,963,785 shares, in the aggregate, of its New Series A convertible preferredConvertible Preferred Stock and New Series B convertible preferredConvertible Preferred Stock at a price equal to $2.87 per share. Upon closure of the tender offer on July 16, 2014, 782,540 shares of New Series A convertible preferredConvertible Preferred Stock and 5,667,790 shares of New Series B convertible preferredConvertible Preferred Stock were purchased for an aggregate price of $18.5 million.
In April 2015, PMI issued and sold 23,888,640 shares of New Series D (“New Series D”) convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $6.91 per share for proceeds of approximately $164.8 million, net of issuance costs. The New Series D convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purpose of the New Series D private placement was to raise funds for general corporate needs and for the share repurchase discussed below.  
In December 2016, PMI authorized 40,000,000 shares of New Series E ("New Series E") convertible preferred stock.Convertible Preferred Stock. These shares are reserved for the convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock warrants that were also issued in December 2016.2016
On December 16, 2016, PMI issued a warrant to purchase 20,267,135 shares of Series E-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock of PMI ("Series E-1") at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “First Series E-1 Warrant”) to Pinecone Investments LLC (“Pinecone”), an affiliate of Colchis Capital Management, L.P. (“Colchis”).
On February 27, 2017, PMI issued to Pinecone Investments LLC a second warrant (the “Second Series E-1 Warrant,” and together with a previously issuedthe First Series E-1 Warrant, the “Series E-1 Warrants”) to purchase 15,277,006 shares of Series E-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Series E-1 Warrants are immediately exercisable, in whole or in part, by paying in cash the full purchase price payable in respect of the number of shares purchased. The Series E-1 Warrants were issued pursuant to the Warrant Agreement dated December 16, 2016 between PMI and Colchis, Capital Management, L.P. ("Colchis"), as previously described in PMI’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on December 22, 2016.
In connection with the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defineddefined in Note 16) 15) entered into with affiliates of the Consortium (as defineddefined in Note 16,15, such affiliates, "Warrant Holders"“Warrant Holders”) a warrant agreement was signed (the "Warrant Agreement"“Series F Warrant Agreement”). Pursuant to the Series F Warrant Agreement, PMI issued to the Consortium three3 warrants (together, the “Series
F-34


F Warrant”) to purchase up to an aggregate 177,720,706 shares of PMI’s Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “Warrant“Series F Warrant Shares”).
F-32


The Warrant Holders' right to exercise the Series F Warrant iswas subject to monthly vesting during the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement based upon the volume of loans the Consortium electselected to purchase (if any) in each month, subject to certain cure rights such as offering additional loans for sale in subsequent periods. Under the terms of the Series F Warrant Agreement, the Series F Warrant Shares may also vest in full upon a change of control of PMI, insolvency of PMI or PFL, certain breaches of contract by PMI or PFL that are not cured within a defined cure period and upon the occurrence of certain events set forth in the Warrant Agreement.
The Series F Warrant will be exercisable with respect to vested Series F Warrant Shares, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the tenth anniversary of its date of issuance. The number of shares underlying the Series F Warrant may be adjusted following certain events such as stock splits, dividends, reclassifications and certain other issuances by PMI.
On September 20, 2017, Prosper issued and sold 37,249,497 shares of Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $1.34 per share for proceeds of approximately $47.9 million, net of issuance costs. The Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purpose of the Series G private placement was to raise funds for general corporate purposes.
On December 23, 2019, Prosper entered into a Stock Repurchase Agreement with an investor to repurchase 7,221,020 shares, in the aggregate, of Series A, Series A-1, and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock for nominal consideration. Upon execution of the Agreement, 2,130,035 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 2,245,600 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, 648,720 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and 2,196,665 shares of Common Stock were repurchased. Upon repurchase of Convertible Preferred Stock, the difference between repurchase price and the carrying amount of the Convertible Preferred Stock was recognized in Additional Paid-In Capital. Additionally, the difference between the repurchase price and par value of the Common Stock was recorded through Additional Paid-In Capital.
On July 13, 2020, the Company established Prosper Grantor Trust (“PGT”), a revocable grantor trust administered by an independent trustee, with the intention of contributing assets to PGT for the benefit of PMI employees in the event of a change in control through an Eligible Employee Retention Plan. PGT was determined to be a VIE and PMI was determined to be its primary beneficiary due to the fact that the Company, through its role as the grantor, has both (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance, including its funding decisions and investment strategy, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses that could be potentially significant to the economic performance of the VIE by virtue of the Company’s requirement to fund PGT in the event that it is unable to meet its obligations to PMI’s employees. PMI also maintains a contingent call liability on PGT’s assets in the event of a bankruptcy. As a result, PGT is fully consolidated into PMI’s consolidated financial statements.
On July 21, 2020, PGT entered into a Stock Transfer Agreement with a PMI investor to purchase 34,670,420 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 16,577,495 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock for nominal consideration. Upon execution of the Stock Transfer Agreement, these shares were purchased by a consolidated VIE of the Company, and thus the difference between the fair value of the repurchased stock and the purchase price is included in Convertible Preferred Stock Held by Consolidated VIE on PMI’s accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021. These shares remain outstanding for legal purposes and retain their voting rights, but are excluded from the earnings per share calculation.
F-35


The number of authorized, issued and outstanding shares, their par value and liquidation preference for each series of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock as of December 31, 20182021 are disclosed in the table below (amounts in thousands, except share and per sharevalue amounts):
Par Value
Authorized
Shares
Outstanding and Issued
Shares
Liquidation
Preference, Outstanding Shares
Series A$0.01 68,558,220 66,428,185 *$19,160 
Series A-1$0.01 24,760,915 22,515,315 45,031 
Series B$0.01 35,775,880 35,127,160 *21,190 
Series C$0.01 24,404,770 24,404,770 70,075 
Series D$0.01 23,888,640 23,888,640 165,000 
Series E-1$0.01 35,544,141 — — 
Series E-2$0.01 16,858,078 — — 
Series F$0.01 177,720,707 — 
Series G$0.01 37,249,497 37,249,497 50,000 
 Total 444,760,848 209,613,570 $370,456 
Convertible Preferred StockPar Value
Authorized
Shares
Outstanding and Issued
Shares
Liquidation
Preference (Outstanding Shares)
Series A$0.01 68,558,220 68,558,220 $19,774 
Series A-1$0.01 24,760,915 24,760,915 49,522 
Series B$0.01 35,775,880 35,775,880 21,581 
Series C$0.01 24,404,770 24,404,770 70,075 
Series D$0.01 23,888,640 23,888,640 165,000 
Series E-1$0.01 35,544,141 — — 
Series E-2$0.01 16,858,078 — — 
Series F$0.01 177,720,707 — 
Series G$0.01 37,249,497 37,249,497 50,000 
   444,760,848 214,637,925 $375,952 

* Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock totals are inclusive of 34,670,420 and 16,577,495 shares, respectively, held by PGT, a consolidated VIE.
Dividends
Dividends on shares of the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F, and Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock are payable only when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors. No dividends will be paid with respect to the common stockCommon Stock until any declared dividends on the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2 Series F and Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock have been paid or set aside for payment to the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F and Series G convertible preferred stockholders. After payment of any such dividends, any additional dividends or distributions will be distributed among all holders of common stockCommon Stock and preferred stock in proportion to the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock that would be held by each such holder if all shares of preferred stock were converted to common stockCommon Stock at the then effective conversion rate. The Series A-1 convertible preferred shares have no dividend rights. To date, no dividends have been declared on any of the PMI’s preferred stock or common stock.Common Stock.
Conversion
Under the terms of PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the holders of preferred stock have the right to convert such preferred stock into common stockCommon Stock at any time. In addition, all preferred stock automatically converts into common stock (i)Common Stock (x) immediately prior to the closing of an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) that values Prosper at least at $2 billion
F-33


and that results in aggregate proceeds to Prosper of at least $100 million or (ii)(y) upon a written request from the holders of at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding preferred stock (on an as-converted basis, provided thatthat: (i) the Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock shall not be converted without at least 14% of the voting power of the outstanding Series A-1 convertible preferred stock;Convertible Preferred Stock; (ii) the Series D shall not be converted without at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Series D; (iii) the Series E-1 and Series E-2 shall not be converted without at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Series E-1 and Series E-2, voting together as a single class; (iv) the Series F shall not be converted without at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Series F, and (v) the shares of Series G Preferred Stock will not be automatically converted unless the holders of at least 60% of the outstanding shares of Series G Preferred Stock approve such conversion.conversion). In addition, if a holder of the Series A convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock has converted any of the Series A convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, then all of such holder’s shares of Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock also will be converted upon a liquidation event. In lieu of any fractional shares of common stockCommon Stock to which a holder would otherwise be entitled, PMI shall pay such holder cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of such fractional shares, as determined by its Board of Directors. At present, each of the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock converts into PMI Common Stock at a 1:1 ratio. Meanwhile, the Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock converts into Common Stock at a 1,000,000:1 ratio and the Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock converts into PMI common stockCommon Stock at a 1:11.36 ratio. The Series G Convertible Preferred Stock conversion ratio whilereflects the Series A-1 convertible preferred stock converts into common stockG true-up that occurred at a 1,000,000:1 ratio.end of the vesting period for the Series E-2 and Series F Preferred Stock warrants.
TheFor the Series G true-up, the conversion price of the Series G convertible preferred stock shall beConvertible Preferred Stock was reduced to a number equal to the Series G Preferred Stock original issuance price, divided by the quotient obtained by dividing the Series G true uptrue-up amount by the total number of Series G Preferred Stock issued as of the Series G closing date. The Series G true uptrue-up amount means the aggregate number of shares of Series G Preferred Stock that would have been issued to the purchasers of the Series G Preferred Stock on the Series G closing date, if warrants to purchase shares of Series E-2 Preferred Stock or Series F Preferred
F-36


Stock that were exercisable or exercised as of the true uptrue-up time (end of vesting period) werehad been exercisable or exercised as of thesuch Series G Preferred Stock closing date.
Liquidation Rights
PMI’s convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock has been classified as temporary equity on the consolidated balance sheet. The preferred stock is not redeemable;redeemable at the option of holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock; however, in the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, change in control or winding up of PMI, holders of the convertible preferred stock may have the right to receive its liquidation preference under the terms of PMI’s certificate of incorporation.
Each holder of Series E-1, Series E-2 and Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock is entitled to receive prior and in preference to any distribution of proceeds from a liquidation event to the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series G and Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock or common stock,Common Stock, an amount per share for (i) each share of Series E-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share, (ii) each share of Series E-2 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of two-thirds the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share, and (iii) each share of Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of two-thirds of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share.
After the payment or setting aside for payment to the holders of Series E-1, Series E-2, and Series F convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock each holder of Series A, Series B, Series C and Series D, Series E-2, Series F and Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock is entitled to receive, on a pari passu basis, prior to and in preference to any distribution of proceeds from a liquidation event to the holders of Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock or common stock,Common Stock, (i) an amount per share for each share of Series E-2 and Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of one-third of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share, and (ii) an amount per share for each share of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D and Series G convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share.
After the payment or setting aside for payment to the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F and Series G convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, the holders of Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, prior and in preference to any distribution of proceeds to the holders of common stockCommon Stock, an amount per share for each such share of Series A-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share.
After the payment or setting aside for payment to the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F, Series G and Series A-1 convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, the entire remaining proceeds legally available for distribution will be distributed pro ratapro-rata to the holders of Series A convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock and common stockCommon Stock in proportion to
F-34


the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock held by them assuming the Series A convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock has been converted into shares of common stockCommon Stock at the then effective conversion rate, provided that the maximum aggregate amount per share of Series A convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock which the holders of Series A convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive is three times the original issue price for the Series A convertible preferred stock.Convertible Preferred Stock.
At present, the liquidation preferences are equal to $0.29 per share for the Series A convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $2.00 per share for the Series A-1 convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.60 per share for the Series B convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $2.87 per share for the Series C convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $6.91 per share for the Series D convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.84 per share for the Series E-1 convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.84 per share for the Series E-2 convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.84 per share for the Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock and $1.34 per share for the Series G convertible preferred stock.Convertible Preferred Stock.
Voting
Each holder of shares of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock into which such shares of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock could be converted and each has voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the common stock.Common Stock. The holders of convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock and the holders of common stockCommon Stock vote together as a single class (except with respect to certain matters that require separate votes or as required by law), and are entitled to notice of any stockholders’ meeting in accordance with the Bylawsbylaws of PMI. 
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability
Series E-1 Warrants
In connection with the Settlement and Release Agreement dated November 17, 2016 among PMI, PFLits wholly owned subsidiary Prosper Funding LLC (“PFL”) and Colchis, on December 16, 2016, PMI issued the First Series E-1 Warrant. The A
F-37


Second Series E-1 Warrant for an additional 15,277,006 shares of Series E-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was granted on the signing of the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 16)15) on February 27, 2017. The warrants expire ten years from the date of issuance. ProsperProsper recognized $9.2$21.3 million of expense and $5.7 million of income and $17.8 million of expense from the re-measurement ofchange in the fair value of the warrants for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. The income andor expense is recorded through changeresulted from changes in the fair value of convertible preferred stock warrantsthe warrant is recorded in Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants on the consolidated statementConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations.
To determine the fair value of the Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants, the Company first determined the value of a share of a Series E-1 convertible preferred stock.Convertible Preferred Stock. To determine the fair value of the convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company first derived the business enterprise value (“BEV”) of the Company using a variety of valuation methods, including recent transactions in the Company's stock, discounted cash flow models and market based methods, as deemed appropriate under the circumstances applicable at the valuation date. Once the Company determined an estimated BEV, the option pricing method ("OPM"(“OPM”) was used to allocate the BEV to the various classes of the Company’sour equity, including the Company’sour preferred stock. The concluded per share value for the Series E-1 convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was utilized as an input to the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the Series E-1 Convertible Stock Warrants.model.
The Company determined the fair value of the outstanding convertible Series E-1 preferred stock warrants utilizing the following assumptions as of the following dates:
December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Volatility40.0%  40.0%  
Risk-free interest rate2.62%  2.38%  
Remaining contractual term (in years)8.049.04
Dividend yield0%  0%  
The above assumptions were determined as follows: 
F-35


December 31, 2021 and 2020:
December 31,
20212020
Volatility63.0 %60.0 %
Risk-free interest rate0.90 %0.20 %
Expected term (in years)2.752.75
Dividend yield— %— %
Volatility: The volatility is derived from historical volatilities of several unrelated publicly listed peer companies over a period approximately equal to the term of the warrant becauseas the Company has limited information on the volatility of theits preferred stock since there is currently no trading history. When making the selections of industry peer companies to be used in the volatility calculation, the Company considered the size, operational, and economic similarities to the Company’s principal business operations.
Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect as of December 31, 2018,2021, and for zero coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities approximately equal to the term of the warrant. 
Remaining ContractualExpected Term: The remaining contractualexpected term representsis the period of time fromfor which the date of the valuationwarrants are expected to the expiration of the warrant. be outstanding.
Dividend Yield:The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s current expectations about the Company’s anticipated dividend policy.
Series F Warrants
In connection with the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as described in Note 16)15) on February 27, 2017, PMI issued warrants to purchase up to 177,720,706 of PMI's Series F convertible preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock at $0.01 per share. The warrants expire ten years from the date of issuance. Prosper recognized $35.8$117.3 million of expense and $32.0 million of income and $11.3 million of expense from the re-measurement of the fair value of the warrants for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. The income or expense resulting from changes in the fair value of the warrant is recorded through other expenses in Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants on the consolidated statementConsolidated Statements of operations. Operations.
To determine the fair value of the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants, the Company first determined the value of a share of a Series F convertible preferred stock.Convertible Preferred Stock. To determine the fair value of the convertible preferred stock,Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company first derived the business enterprise value (“BEV”) of the CompanyBEV using a variety of valuation methods, including recent transactions in the Company's stock, discounted cash flow models and market baseda combination of methods, as deemed appropriate under the circumstances applicable at the valuation date. Once the Company determined an estimated BEV, the option pricing method ("OPM")OPM was used to allocate the BEV to the various classes of the Company’sProsper's equity, including the Company’sour preferred stock. The concluded per share value for the Series F convertible preferred stock wasConvertible Preferred Stock warrants utilized as an input to the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the Series F Convertible Stock Warrants.model.
F-38


The Company determined the fair value of the outstanding Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrantsWarrants utilizing the following assumptions as of December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 2017:2020:
December 31,
December 31, 2018December 31, 201720212020
VolatilityVolatility40.0%  40.0%  Volatility63.00 %60.0 %
Risk-free interest rateRisk-free interest rate2.63%  2.38%  Risk-free interest rate0.90 %0.20 %
Remaining contractual term (in years)8.169.16
Expected term (in years)Expected term (in years)2.752.75
Dividend yieldDividend yield0%  0%  Dividend yield— %— %
The above assumptions were determined as follows:
Volatility: The volatility is derived from historical volatilities of several unrelated publicly listed peer companies over a period approximately equal tousing the term ofsame criteria described above for the warrant because the Company has limited information on the volatility of the preferred stock since there is currently no trading history. When making the selections of industry peer companies to be used in the volatility calculation, the Company considered the size, operational, and economic similarities to the Company’s principal business operations.
Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect as of the period end date and for zero coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities approximately equal to the term of the warrant.
Remaining Contractual Term: The remaining contractual term represents the time from the date of the valuation to the expiration of the warrant.
F-36


Dividend Yield: The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s current expectations about the Company’s anticipated dividend policy.Series E-1 Warrants.
The combined activity of the Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 2017 are2020 is as follows (in thousands):
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability 
Balance at January 1, 20172020$149,996 21,711 
Warrants vested65,516 
Change in Fair Valuefair value29,139 (37,677)
Balance at December 31, 20172020$116,366112,319 
Warrants Vested72,316 
Change in Fair Valuefair value(45,003)138,622 
Balance at December 31, 20182021$143,679250,941 
Common Stock
PMI, through its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, is the sole issuer of common stockCommon Stock and related options, RSUs and warrants. On February 16, 2016, PMI amended and restated its Certificate of Incorporation to, among other things, effect a 5-for-1 forward stock split. On September 20, 2017, PMI further amended its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stockCommon Stock authorized for issuance. The total number of shares of stock which PMI has the authority to issue is 1,069,760,848, consisting of 625,000,000 shares of common stock,Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 444,760,848 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. As described above, the Company repurchased 2,196,665 shares of Common Stock on December 23, 2019. As of December 31, 2018, 71,411,1452021, 73,089,929 shares of common stockCommon Stock were issued and 70,475,21072,153,994 shares of common stockCommon Stock were outstanding. As of December 31, 2017, 71,226,9342020, 70,075,307 shares of common stockCommon Stock were issued and 70,290,99969,139,372 shares of common stockCommon Stock were outstanding. Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held.  
Common Stock Issued upon Exercise of Stock Options
During the year ended December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 2017,2020, PMI issued 176,0113,014,622 and 606,284687,471 shares of common stock,Common Stock, respectively, upon the exercise of vested options for cash proceeds of $30$61 thousand and $99$15 thousand, respectively. Certain options are eligible for exercise prior to vesting. These unvested options may be exercised for restricted shares of common stock that have the same vesting schedule as the options. Prosper records a liability for the exercise price paid upon the exercise of unvested options, which is reclassified to common stock and additional paid-in capital as the shares vest. Should the optionholder’s employment be terminated, the unvested restricted shares are subject to repurchase by PMI at an amount equal to the exercise price paid for such shares. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were 0 and 11,565 shares respectively of restricted stock outstanding that remain unvested and subject to PMI’s right of repurchase.
Common Stock Issued upon Exercise of Warrants
For the year ended December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 2017,2020, PMI issued 8,200 and 30,615zero shares of common stockCommon Stock upon the exercise of warrants, for $0.02 per share and $0.34 per share respectively.warrants.
NOTE 13. Share Based Incentive Plan and CompensationSTOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
PMI grants equity awards primarily through its Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was approved as amended and restated by its stockholders on December 1, 2010; and its 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by its stockholders on April 7, 2015 and subsequently amended by an Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 2,3, which were approved by PMI's stockholders oneffective as of February 15, 2016, and May 31, 2016, and September 5, 2018 respectively (as amended, the "2015 Plan"“2015 Plan”). In March 2015, the 2005 Plan expired, except that any awards granted under the 2005 Plan prior to its expiration remain in effect pursuant to their terms. As of December 31, 2018,2021, under the 2015 Plan, options to purchase up to 95,152,24696,855,913 shares of PMI's common stockCommon Stock are reserved and may be granted to employees, directors, and consultants by PMI’s Board of
F-37


Directors and stockholders to promote the success of Prosper’s business. Options generally vest 25% 1one year from the vesting commencement date and 1/48th per month thereafter or vest 50% 2two years from
F-39


the vesting commencement date and 1/48 per month thereafter or vest 1/36th per month from the vesting commencement date. In no event are options exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant.
Stock Option Reprice
On May 3, 2016 and March 17, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of PMI approved two separate stock option repricing programs authorizing PMI’s officers to reprice certain outstanding stock options held by employees and directors that had exercise prices above the current fair market value of PMI’s Common Stock on those respective dates.
On August 11, 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of PMI approved a stock option repricing program (the “2016 Reprice”“2020 Repricing” and together with the 2016 Repricing and the 2017 Repricing, the “Repricings”), authorizing PMI’s officers to reprice certain outstanding stock options held by employees and directors that have exercise prices above the current fair market value of PMI’s common stock. ThisThe repricing was effected on May 16, 2016 for eligible directors and employees located in the United States and on May 19, 2016 for eligible employees located in Israel.
On March 17, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of PMI approved a stock option repricing program (the “2017 Reprice” and together with the 2016 Reprice, the "Repricings"), authorizing PMI’s officers to reprice certain outstanding stock options held by employees and directors that have exercise prices above the current fair market value of PMI’s common stock.  This repricing was effected on March 17, 2017August 11, 2020 for eligible directors and employees.
ProsperPMI believes that the Repricings will encourage the continued service of valued employees and directors and motivate them to perform at high levels, both of which are critical to Prosper’sthe Company’s continued success. ProsperPMI has incurred and expects to incur additional stockshare based compensation charges as a result of the Repricings.
The financial statement impact of the above Repricings was $0.80t material for the year ended December 31, 2021, and$0.4 million and $1.9$0.3 million infor the years ended December 31, 20182020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, respectively, as well as $0.3 million2021, the unamortized Repricings expense (net of forfeitures) that will be immaterial and recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period of 0.7 years.1.6 years.
Stock Option Activity
Stock option activity under the 2005 Plan and 2015 PlanStock Plans is summarized for the year ended December 31, 2018 below:2021 as follows:
 
Options
Issued and
Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted Average
Contractual Term
(in years)
Balance as of January 1, 201858,628,039 $0.25  
Options granted23,757,508 $0.52  
Options exercised – vested(176,011)$0.17  
Options forfeited(11,187,838)$0.32  
Option expirations— $— 
Balance as of December 31, 201871,021,698 $0.33 8.20
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 201858,548,166 $0.33 8.20
Options vested and exercisable at December 31, 201836,553,614 $0.24 7.55
 
Options
Issued and
Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-Average
Contractual Term
(in years)
Aggregate intrinsic value1
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 202172,915,449 $0.02 7.02$2,915 
     Options granted17,554,859 $0.22  
     Options exercised(3,014,622)$0.02  
     Options forfeited(15,239,345)$0.03  
     Option expirations(30,190)$0.02 
Balance as of December 31, 202172,186,151 $0.07 6.72$46,458 
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 202165,003,920 $0.07 6.72$42,518 
Options vested and exercisable at December 31, 202148,561,623 $0.02 5.62$33,499 
For
1. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the year ended December 31, 2018, we granted stock options to purchase 23,757,508 sharesexcess of common stock at a weighted average grant datethe fair value of $0.52 per share.our Common Stock as of December 31, 2021 over the exercise price of the outstanding in-the-money options.
F-38


Additional information pertaining to PMI's Common Stock option activities is as follows:
Year ended December 31,
202120202019
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted (per share)$0.13 $0.04 $0.11 
Other Information Regarding Stock Options
Additional information regarding common stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2018 is as follows:
 Options OutstandingOptions Vested and Exercisable
Range of
Exercise
Prices
Number
Outstanding
Weighted –
Avg.
Remaining
Life (in years)
Weighted –
Avg.
Exercise
Price
Number
Vested
Weighted -
Avg.
Exercise
Price
0.02 - 0.204,156,140 5.04$0.11 4,156,140 $0.11 
0.21 - 0.5045,437,021 8.060.25 29,006,509 0.22 
0.51 - 1.1321,428,537 9.100.54 3,390,965 0.54 
0.02 - 1.1371,021,698 8.20$0.33 36,553,614 $0.24 
The fair value of options granted to employees is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. This valuation model for stock-basedshare based compensation expense requires ProsperPMI to make assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the calculation, including the fair value of PMI’s common stock,Common Stock, the expected term (the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding), the volatility of PMI’s common stock,Common Stock, a risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends. Given the absence of a publicly traded market, Prosperthe Company considered numerous objective and subjective factors to determine the fair value of PMI’s common stockCommon Stock at each grant date. These factors included, but were not limited to:
F-40


(i) contemporaneous valuations of common stockCommon Stock performed by unrelated third-party specialists, (ii) the prices for PMI’s preferred stock sold to outside investors, (iii) the rights, preferences and privileges of PMI’s preferred stock relative to PMI’s common stock;Common Stock; (iv) the lack of marketability of PMI’s common stock,Common Stock, (v) developments in the business, (vi) secondary transactions of PMI’s common and preferred shares, and (vii) the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a merger or acquisition of Prosper, given prevailing market conditions. As PMI’s stock is not publicly traded volatility for stock options is based on an average of the historical volatilities of the common stockCommon Stock of several entities with characteristics similar to those of Prosper.PMI. The expected term assumptions were determined based on the vesting terms, exercise terms and contractual lives of the options using the simplified method. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option. ProsperPMI uses an expected dividend yield of zero as it does not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.
ProsperPMI also estimates forfeitures of unvested stock options. Expected forfeitures are based on Prosper’sthe Company’s historical experience. To the extent actual forfeitures differ from the estimates, the difference will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. No compensation cost is recorded for options that do not vest.
The fair value of PMI’s stock option awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted average assumptions:
December 31,
 202120202019
Volatility of common stock64.22 %52.62 %46.70 %
Risk-free interest rate1.02 %0.51 %1.95 %
Expected life6.0 years6.0 years6.0 years
Dividend yield— %— %— %
Year ended December 31,
 201820172016
Volatility of common stock44.04 %49.24 %50.88 %
Risk-free interest rate2.78 %2.12 %1.29 %
Expected life6.0 years6.0 years5.8 years
Dividend yield— %— %— %

PMI did not grant any performance-based options in 2016, 2017,2021, 2020, or 2018.2019.
Restricted Stock Unit ActivityUnits
DuringFor the years ended December 31, 2016, 20172021, 2020 and 2018,2019, PMI granteddid not grant any restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to certain employees that are subject to three-year vesting terms or four-year vesting terms and the occurrence of a liquidity event..
The aggregate fair value of the RSUs granted was $1.9 million. The following table summarizes the activitiesnumber of PMI’s RSU activity for PMI’s RSUs during 2018:the year ended December 31, 2021:
F-39


 Number of SharesWeighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 20214,661,141 $0.91 
Forfeited(1,786,793)$0.54 
Unvested at December 31, 20212,874,348 $1.14 
 Number of Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value 
Unvested at January 1, Unvested - January 1, 20181,399,180 2.16 
Granted3,569,586 0.54 
Vested— — 
Forfeited(112,625)2.17 
Unvested - December 31, 20184,856,141 0.96 
Stock Based Compensation
The following table presents the amount of stock-based compensation related to stock-based awards granted to employees recognized in Prosper’s consolidated statementsthe Company’s Consolidated Statements of operations duringOperations for the periods presented (in thousands):
December 31, Years Ended December 31,
201820172016 202120202019
Origination and ServicingOrigination and Servicing$911 $996 $2,004 Origination and Servicing$123 $35 $417 
Sales and MarketingSales and Marketing451 553 2,914 Sales and Marketing62 69 243 
General and AdministrativeGeneral and Administrative7,039 10,689 14,824 General and Administrative951 1,809 3,868 
Restructuring— — 45 
Total stock based compensation$8,401 $12,238 $19,787 
Total Stock-Based CompensationTotal Stock-Based Compensation$1,136 $1,913 $4,528 
During
For the yearyears ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, Prosper capitalized $392capitalized $137 thousand $294, $234 thousand and $718$310 thousand, respectively, of stock-based compensation as internal use software and website developmentdevelopment costs. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the unamortized stock-basedshare-based compensation expense adjusted for forfeiture estimates related to Prosper's employees’ unvested stock-basedshare-based awards was approximately $7.5$1.6 million, which will be recognized over thea remaining weighted-average vesting period of approximately 2.02.8 years.
14. Restructuring
During 2016, Prosper adopted a strategic restructuring of its business. This restructuring was intended to streamline our operations and support future growth efforts. Under this restructuring, Prosper closed its Salt Lake City, Utah location and its Tel Aviv, Israel location.
In the year ended December 31, 2018, Prosper's restructuring costs related accretion and changes in sublease loss estimates related to properties no longer in use. Other than accretion and changes in sublease loss estimates, Prosper does not expect any additional restructuring charges related to this restructuring.  
The following table summarizes the activities related to Prosper's restructuring plan (in thousands):
Severance RelatedFacilities RelatedTotal
Balance January 1, 2017597 6,052 6,649 
Adjustments to expense(13)1,227 1,214 
Transfer from deferred rent— 210 210 
Less: Cash paid(584)(4,245)(4,829)
Balance December 31, 2017— 3,244 3,244 
Adjustments to expense— 1,486 1,486 
Sublease cash receipts— 370 370 
Less: Cash paid— (3,126)(3,126)
Balance December 31, 2018$— $1,974 $1,974 

F-40F-41


15. Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, tax reform legislation (“the Act”) received its final required approval. The Act includes a broad range of tax reform proposals affecting businesses, including corporate tax rates, business deductions, and international tax provisions. Some of the changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, immediate expensing of certain depreciable assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017, and uncertainties around the tax accounting for debt instrument income under IRC Section 451.
On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") was issued by the SEC to address the application of US GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Act. In accordance with SAB 118, the Company has recorded provisional amounts in connection with the re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities of approximately $34 million, offset by a full valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2018, we have completed our accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Reform Act. There are no material adjustments from our provisional amounts.NOTE 14. INCOME TAXES
The components of income taxthe Company’s Income Tax Expense are as follows for the periods presented (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
201820172016 202120202019
Current:Current:  Current:  
FederalFederal$— $— $— Federal$— $— $— 
StateState— — — State— — — 
ForeignForeign24 — 124 Foreign— — — 
Total Current Income Tax (Benefit)24 — 124 
Total Current Income Tax Expense (Benefit)Total Current Income Tax Expense (Benefit)— — — 
Deferred:Deferred:  Deferred:  
FederalFederal47 (579)394 Federal47 47 47 
StateState33 37 28 State24 38 52 
ForeignForeign68 34 — Foreign— (69)
Total Deferred Income Tax148 (508)422 
Total Income Tax$172 $(508)$546 
Total Deferred Income Tax ExpenseTotal Deferred Income Tax Expense71 16 100 
Total Income Tax ExpenseTotal Income Tax Expense$71 $16 $100 
The income tax expense (benefit)
Income Tax Expense differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 21% to pretax loss as a result of the following:following for the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
201820172016 202120202019
Federal tax at statutory rateFederal tax at statutory rate21 %34 %34 %Federal tax at statutory rate21 %21 %21 %
State tax at statutory rate (net of federal benefit)State tax at statutory rate (net of federal benefit)%%%State tax at statutory rate (net of federal benefit)%%%
Permanent Items— %— %(1)%
Change in U.S. Tax Rate Applied to Deferred Taxes— %(31)%— %
Incentive Stock OptionsIncentive Stock Options(3)%(1)%(2)%Incentive Stock Options(5)%%(4)%
Preferred Stock Warrants Preferred Stock Warrants %(21)%— %Preferred Stock Warrants(29)%(64)%%
Change in valuation allowance Change in valuation allowance (32)%11 %(37)%Change in valuation allowance%37 %(33)%
OtherOther%%(1)%Other(1)%(4)%(1)%
%%— %
Income Tax ExpenseIncome Tax Expense— %— %— %

Temporary items that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows for the periods presented (in thousands):
 December 31,
 20212020
Net operating loss carry forwards$91,793 $92,814 
Research and other credits307 532 
Stock compensation4,272 10,510 
Accrued liabilities4,357 2,986 
Lease liabilities3,266 3,934 
Total deferred tax assets103,995 110,776 
Net servicing rights(1,898)(2,067)
Property and equipment(1,873)(287)
Intangible assets(1,770)(1,415)
Right-of-use assets(2,264)(2,676)
Total deferred tax liabilities(7,805)(6,445)
Total net deferred tax asset96,190 104,331 
Less: Valuation allowance(96,750)(104,820)
Net deferred tax liability$(560)$(489)

F-41F-42


 December 31,
 20182017
Net operating loss carry forwards$82,510 $74,890 
Research & other credits668 725 
Fixed assets463 — 
Stock compensation9,237 7,653 
Accrued liabilities3,256 3,028 
Restructuring liability615 974 
Other21 
Deferred tax assets96,753 87,291 
Fair value of loans(248)(493)
Net servicing rights(3,375)(3,500)
Fixed assets— (73)
Intangible assets(721)(2,357)
Foreign Earnings(68)(187)
Deferred tax liabilities(4,412)(6,610)
Net deferred tax assets92,341 80,681 
Valuation allowance(92,714)(80,906)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(373)$(225)
Prosper has determined that its net deferred tax asset did not satisfy the recognition criteria set forth in ASC Topic 740 and, accordingly, established a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance as of December 31, 2018, increased by $11.8 million to $92.7 million from $80.9 million in the prior fiscal year. Under ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASC Topic 740”), a valuation allowance must be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The amount of valuation allowance would beis based upon management’s best estimate of Prosper’s ability to realize the net deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance can subsequently be reduced when management believes that the assets are realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis. As of December 31, 2021, the Company continues to record a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance as of December 31, 2021, decreased by $8.1 million to $96.8 million from the prior year.
The Internal Revenue Code imposes substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating losses and tax credits in the event of an “ownership change” of a corporation. Accordingly, Prosper’s ability to utilize net operating losses and credit carryforwards may be limited in the future as the result of such an “ownership change.”
Prosper files federal and various state income tax returns. Prosperreturns, and has net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income, if any, for both federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $308.0$345.3 million and $340.5$366.2 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2018, available2021. The state net operating loss carryforwards are primarily related to reduce future income subject to income taxes.California. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2026. The state2025 and 2022, respectively. All net operating loss carryforwards began expiring in 2018.are subject to a full valuation allowance. Prosper has federal and California research and development tax credits of approximately $428 thousand and $450$501 thousand, respectively. The federal research credits will begin to expire in 2034 and the California research credits have no expiration date. Prosper also has California enterprise zone credits of $1.1approximately $0.2 million that will begin to expire in 2024.2022.
The following table summarizes Prosper’s activity related to its unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):
Unrecognized Tax Benefit
Balance at January 1, 2017$913 
Decrease related to 2017 tax year position(801)
Balance at December 31, 20172020$112 
DecreaseChange related to 20182020 tax year position— 
Balance at December 31, 20182020$112 
Change related to 2021 tax year position— 
Balance at December 31, 2021$112 
None of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect Prosper’s effective tax rate if these amounts are recognized due to the full valuation allowance. 
F-42


Prosper’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.Income Tax Expense. As of December 31, 2018,2021, Prosper has not incurred any significant interest or penalties.
All tax returns will remain open for examination by the federal and most state taxing authorities for 3 yearsthree and 4four years, respectively, from the date of utilization of any net operating loss carryforwards or research and development credits.
16. Consortium Purchase AgreementNOTE 15. CONSORTIUM PURCHASE AGREEMENT
On February 27, 2017, Prosper entered into a series of agreements (the "Consortium“Consortium Purchase Agreement"Agreement”) with a consortium of investors (the "Consortium"“Consortium”), pursuant to which the Consortium has agreed to purchase borrower loansBorrower Loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $5.0 billion (including certain loans purchased by one of the investors prior to the date of the Consortium Purchase Agreement). PFL will bewas obligated to offer for purchase minimum monthly volumes of eligible loans to the Consortium, for the Consortium to elect to purchase. The Consortium Purchase Agreement ended in May 2019.
In connection with the Consortium Purchase Agreement, PMI issued to the Consortium three3 warrant certificates to purchase up to an aggregate 177,720,706 shares of PMI’s Series F Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the "Warrant Shares"“Warrant Shares”).
The Consortium’s right to exercise the Series F Warrant iswas subject to monthly vesting during the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement based upon the volume of loans the Consortium electselected to purchase (if any) in each month, subject to certain cure rights such as offering additional loans for sale in subsequent periods. Pursuant to these cure rights, if the Consortium failsfailed to respond to offers for allocation, purchase or funding, the Consortium cancould take advantage of a designated period of time to cure such failure. There have beenwere no such failures by the Consortium to date.during the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the Series F Warrant Agreement, the Warrant Shares may also vest in full upon a change of control of PMI, insolvency of PMI or PFL, certain breaches of contract by PMI or PFL that are not cured within a defined cure period and upon the occurrence of certain other events set forth in the Series F Warrant Agreement.
On vesting of the Series F warrants,Warrants, Prosper recordsrecorded a liability as "ConvertibleConvertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability"Liability on the consolidated balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and a corresponding amount as "FairFair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans"Loans on the consolidated statementConsolidated Statements of operations.Operations. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the vested warrants are recorded in "ChangeChange in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants"Warrants on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations. Additionally, in connection with the execution of the Consortium Purchase Agreement, certain previously issued rebates were
F-43


settled by an issuance of vested Series F Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. The difference in fair value of these warrants over the cash settlement price iswas recorded in "ChangeChange in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants"Warrants on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations.
The following represents theThrough its expiration in May 2019, $3.3 billion in loans purchasedwere acquired and 177.7 million warrants vested under the Consortium Purchase Agreement:
Loans Acquired (in thousands)Warrants Vested
Balance as of January 1, 2017$— — 
On signing of the Consortium Purchase Agreement$— 9,830,494 
Loans Purchased by the Consortium during the year ended December 31, 20171,826,527 65,355,508 
Balance as of December 31, 2017$1,826,527 75,186,002 
Loans Purchased by the Consortium during the year ended December 31, 20181,240,805 79,726,978 
Balance as of December 31, 2018$3,067,332 154,912,980 
Agreement. In addition to the $3.1$3.3 billion of loans acquired above, the warrants vested on signing of the Consortium Purchase Agreement were issued to settle certain rebates on $0.3 billion of whole loan purchases by members of the Consortium prior to the signing of the Consortium Purchase Agreement. This $0.3 billion also reducesreduced the up to $5.0 billion aggregate amount under the Consortium Purchase Agreement.
NOTE 16. LEASES
Prosper has operating leases for corporate offices and datacenters. These leases have remaining lease terms of 1 year to 6 years. Some of the lease agreements include options to extend the lease term for up to an additional 5 years. Rental expense under operating lease arrangements was $4.5 million, $4.5 million and $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021,2020 and 2019, respectively. Additionally, Prosper subleases certain leased office space to third parties when it determines there is excess leased capacity. Sublease revenue from operating lease arrangements was $0.3 million, $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Operating Lease Right-of-Use (“ROU”) Assets
The following table summarizes the operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets as of December 31, 2021, which are included in Property and Equipment, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, 2021
Gross
Carrying Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying Value
ROU assets - office buildings$16,709 $9,444 $7,265 
ROU assets - other776 344 432 
Total operating lease ROU assets$17,485 $9,788 $7,697 

The Company identified certain impairment triggers related to its ROU assets in 2020, primarily due to the non-renewal of certain sublease agreements and the time expected to find new subtenants. As a result of impairment testing performed on these ROU assets, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. No impairment charge was identified for the years ended December 31, 2021 or December 31, 2019.
Lease Liabilities
Prosper has entered into various non-cancelable operating leases for certain offices with contractual lease periods expiring between 2021 and 2026.
Future maturities of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2021 were as follows (in thousands). The present value of the future minimum lease payments represents our operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2021 and are included in "Other Liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets.
December 31, 2021
2022$5,833 
20232,124 
20241,360 
20251,395 
20261,218 
Thereafter— 
Total future minimum lease payments11,930 
Less: Imputed interest(904)
Present value of future minimum lease payments$11,026 

F-43F-44


Because the rate implicit in each lease is not readily determinable, we use our incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of the lease payments. Values used to determine present value of leases is as follows (dollars in thousands):
December 31, 2021
Cash paid for operating leases year-to-date$5,381 
ROU assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease obligations year-to-date$1,773 
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)3.12 years
Weighted average discount rate5.19 %

NOTE 17. Commitments and ContingenciesCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of its operations, Prosper becomes involved in various legal actions. Prosper maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. Prosper does not believe it is probable that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any such matters will have a material effect on Prosper's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Future Minimum Lease Payments
Prosper has entered into various non-cancelable operating leases for certain offices with contractual lease periods expiring between 2022 and 2027.
The table below presents future minimum rental payments, net of minimum sublease rentals of $5.3 million, for the remaining terms of the operating leases (in thousands):
2019 4,536 
20204,683 
20214,456 
20224,319 
2023847 
Thereafter 387 
Total future operating lease obligations $19,228 

The payments in the above table include amounts that have been accrued for as part of the restructuring liability in Note 14 Restructuring. Such accrual balances related to operating facility leases were $2.0 million at December 31, 2018.
Rental expense under operating lease arrangements was $4.2 million, $4.7 million and $6.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Operating Commitments
Prosper has entered into an agreement with WebBank, under which all Borrower Loans originated through the marketplace are made by WebBank under its bank charter. On June 25, 2021, PMI, along with its wholly-owned subsidiary Prosper Funding LLC, and WebBank entered into: (i) a Fifth Amendment (the “Sale Agreement Amendment”) to the Asset Sale Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between Prosper Funding LLC and WebBank (the “Sale Agreement”); (ii) a Sixth Amendment (the “Marketing Agreement Amendment”) to the Marketing Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (the “Marketing Agreement”); and (iii) a Third Amendment (the “Purchase Agreement Amendment”) to the Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (the “Purchase Agreement” and, collectively with the Sale Agreement and the Marketing Agreement, the “Origination and Sale Agreements”).
The Sale Agreement Amendment, among other things, extends the term of the Sale Agreement to February 1, 2019, Prosper2025 and amends certain collateral requirements under the Sale Agreement. The Marketing Agreement Amendment, among other things, extends the term of the Marketing Agreement to February 1, 2025 and sets forth the amended terms and conditions of certain fees owed by the Registrants to WebBank extendedunder the termsMarketing Agreement. The Purchase Agreement Amendment amends certain collateral requirements of theirPMI under the Purchase Agreement. See Footnote 22.
Pursuant to the agreement,Marketing Agreement Amendment, the marketing fee that Prosper receives in connection with the origination of each loan is partially reduced by an amount (the “Designated Amount”) calculated as a percentage of the principal amount of such loan based on the aggregate principal amount of loans originated for the applicable month. To the extent the aggregate Designated Amount for all loans originated during any month is less than $143,500 through February 1, 2022, and $100,000 thereafter through February 1, 2025, Prosper is required to pay WebBank an amount equal to such deficiency. Accordingly, thethe minimum fee is $1.7$1.2 million for the years ended 2019, 2020each year from 2022 through 2024, and 2021. The minimum fee is $0.1 million for the year ended 2022. in 2025.
Additionally, under the agreement with WebBank, Prosper is required to maintain minimum net liquidity of $15 million at all times during the term of the agreement. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. Violation of this covenant can result in termination of the contract with WebBank. At December 31, 20182021, Prosper was in compliance with the covenant.
Loan Purchase Commitments
Prosper has entered into an agreement with WebBank to purchase $25.9$13.8 million of Borrower Loans that WebBank originated during the last two business days of the year ended December 31, 2018 and the first business day of the quarter ending March 31, 2019.2021. Prosper will purchase these Borrower Loans within the first threetwo business days of the quarteryear ending MarchDecember 31, 2019.2022.
Repurchase and Indemnification ContingencyObligation
Under the terms of the loan purchase agreements between Prosper and investors that participate in the Whole Loan Channel, Prosper may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Borrower Loan from an investor. Generally, these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding
F-44


protocols or a violation of the applicable federal, state or local lending laws. Prosper recognizes a liability at fair value for the repurchase obligation when the Borrower Loans are sold. The fair value of the indemnification and repurchase obligation is estimated based on historical experience and the initial fair value is insignificant. Prosper recognizes a liability for the repurchase and indemnification obligation when the Borrower Loans are issued. Indemnified or repurchasedexperience. Repurchased Borrower Loans associated with violations of federal, state or local lending laws or verifiable identity theft are written off at the time of repurchase or at the time an indemnification payment is made.repurchase. The maximum potential amount of future payments associated under thisthe repurchase obligation is the outstanding balances of the Borrower Loans issuedsold through the Whole Loan channels,
F-45


which at December 31, 20182021 is $3.6$2.5 billion. Prosper has accrued $0.9$0.3 million and $0.8$0.2 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 20172020, respectively, in regardrelated to this obligation.      
Securities Law ComplianceRegulatory Contingencies
Prosper accrues for contingencies when a loss from such contingencies is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In 2017,determining whether a loss is probable and if it is possible to quantify the amount of the estimated loss, Prosper madereviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on at least a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If Prosper determines that an unfavorable outcome is not probable or that the final annual installmentamount of $3 million regarding a settlementloss cannot be reasonably estimated, Prosper does not accrue for a potential litigation loss. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and Prosper can estimate a range of outcomes, an amount is recorded which management considers to a class action lawsuitbe the best estimate within the range of potential losses that was agreed to in 2013 (the "2013 Settlement").

are both probable and estimable; however, if management cannot quantify the amount of the estimated loss, then the low end of the range of the potential losses is recorded.
SEC Inquiry

In MayApril 2017, Prosper notified Note investors that we had recently becomebecame aware of an error in the manner in which we calculated the annualized net return (“ANR”) and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to noteNote investors. The Company promptly provided note investors with current, corrected ANR and seasoned ANR calculations. The staff ofProsper was advised by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) conducted an investigation as toSEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. PFL fully and voluntarily cooperated withOn April 19, 2019, the investigation and recently madeSEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter withmatter. Under the SEC. The proposed settlement, would be entered into by PFL without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings and would resolve anSEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of 1933. Under the terms of the proposed settlement,that provision. PFL wouldneither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3$3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million and agree not to commit or cause any future violations of Section 17(a)was paid in full in April 2019.
West Virginia Matter
In January 2018, the Attorney General of the Securities Act. The proposed settlement remains subjectState of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and practices of PMI and PFL that the Attorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to approvalwhich Prosper responded with such information as was requested by the SEC’s Commissioners.Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, Prosper received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that, without in any way admitting that any of its prior practices were in violation of the Consumer Act, Prosper agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. Prosper is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.

The proposed penaltyWe cannot predict the outcome of $3 millionthe matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been accrued as of December 31, 2018 in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities onmade.
No loans have been originated through the Consolidated Balance Sheet and in Other Expenses, Net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. 

Prosper platform to West Virginians since June 2016.
NOTE 18. Related PartiesRELATED PARTIES
Since Prosper’s inception, it has engaged in various transactions with its directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of its voting securities, and with immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders. Prosper believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to Prosper than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Prosper’s executive officers, directors who are not executive officers, and certain affiliates participate in its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes and Borrower Loans.Notes. The aggregate amount of the Notes and Borrower Loans purchased and the income earned by
F-46


parties deemed to be affiliates and related parties of Prosper for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, as well as the Notes outstanding as of December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 are summarized below (in thousands):
Related Party
Aggregate Amount of
Notes Purchased
Interest Earned on
Notes
Aggregate Amount of Notes Purchased for the Year Ended December 31,Interest Earned on Notes for the Year Ended December 31,
2018201720182017 2021202020212020
Executive officers and managementExecutive officers and management$29 $29 $$109 Executive officers and management$35 $28 $$
Directors421 366 45 40 
Directors (excluding executive officers and management)Directors (excluding executive officers and management)24 272 43 
TotalTotal$450 $395 $47 $149 Total$59 $300 $$49 

F-45


Related PartyNotes balance as of December 31,
 20182017
Executive officers and management$32 $38 
Directors569 553 
 $601 $591 
Notes Balance as of
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Executive officers and management$41 $41 
Directors (excluding executive officers and management)15 — 
Total$56 $41 

NOTE 19. Postretirement Benefit PlansPOSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Prosper has a 401(k) plan that covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Prosper’s contributions to the plan are discretionary. During the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, Prosper has contributed $2.0 million, $2.2$1.2 million and $2.6$2.3 million, respectively, to the 401(k) plan, respectively.plan.
NOTE 20. Significant Concentrations  SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS
Prosper is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, asset managers, and investment funds to provide the funds to allow WebBank to originate Borrower Loans that the third party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2018, the largest2021, one individual party purchased a total26.7% of 44%such loans, and the Company’s Warehouse VIEs purchased 12.6% of thosesuch loans. This compares to 70% for the largest party forFor the year ended December 31, 2017.  Further,2020, two individual parties purchased 21.4% and 14.3% of such loans, respectively, and the Company’s Warehouse VIEs purchased 18.2% of such loans. These purchases reflect that a significant portion of ourProsper’s business is dependent on funding through the Whole Loan Channel, forthrough which 94%88% and 93%91% of Borrower Loans were originated through the Whole Loan Channel in the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
Prosper receives all of its transaction fee revenue related to personal loans from WebBank. Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank for our services in facilitating originations of Borrower Loans issued by WebBank. The rate of the transaction fee for each individual Borrower Loan is based on the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan. No individual borrower or investor accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net revenue for any of the periods presented.    
21. SegmentsNOTE 22. SEGMENTS
Our chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, we havethe Company has a single reporting and operating segment.

NOTE 23. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
22. Subsequent Events
WebBank Agreement
On February 1, 2019, ProsperManagement has evaluated subsequent events or transactions occurring through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued and WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah-chartered industrial bank (“WebBank”), entered into: (i) a Third Amendment (the “Sale Agreement Amendment”)determined that no events or transactions, other than any items disclosed within the consolidated financial statements and related notes, are required to the Asset Sale Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between Prosper Funding and WebBank (the “Sale Agreement”); (ii) a Third Amendment (the “Marketing Agreement Amendment”) to the Marketing Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (the “Marketing Agreement”); and (iii) a First Amendment (the “Purchase Agreement Amendment”) to the Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (the “Purchase Agreement” and, collectively with the Sale Agreement and Marketing Agreement, the “Origination and Sale Agreements”). The Sale Agreement Amendment, the Marketing Agreement Amendment, and the Purchase Agreement Amendment, collectively, are hereinafter referred to as the “Amendments”.
The Amendments extend the term of the Sale Agreement, Marketing Agreement and Purchase Agreements to February 1, 2022. The Purchase Agreement Amendment also amends certain collateral requirements of PMI under the Purchase Agreement.

F-46


Securitization

On February 7, 2019, Prosper acted as a co-sponsor on a securitization of borrower loans. Prosper and other investors contributed borrower loans with an aggregate principal balance of $207.7 million to the securitization. $100.4 million of the proceeds from the securitization were used to make a payment on the Warehouse Line. Prosper is still assessing the accounting impact of this transaction.     
be disclosed herein.
F-47


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Prosper Funding LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Funding LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, member’s equity, and cash flows, , for each of the three years ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Emphasis of a Matter
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company earns significant amounts of revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation of Borrower Loans — Refer to Notes 2, 4 and 7 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company measures Borrower Loans at fair value which are classified as Level 3 instruments. As of December 31, 2021, Borrower Loans were $267.6 million. The Company estimates the fair value using discounted cash flow valuation methodologies incorporating significant unobservable inputs and valuation assumptions that are reflective of management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instruments and requires significant management judgment or estimate. The main assumptions used to value the Borrower Loans include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade of the loans.
Auditing the methodology and unobservable inputs, specifically, the unobservable inputs related to the discount rate, default rate and prepayment rate, used by management to estimate the fair value of Borrower Loans required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
F-48


Our audit procedures related to the valuation of Borrower Loans, at fair value including unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value included the following key procedures:
We performed inquiries with management and the Company’s third-party valuation expert to understand the process for developing, and assumptions used in, the valuation model.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we developed independent estimates of fair value and compared our estimates to the Company’s estimates.
We tested the source information derived from the Company’s data used in the valuation models.
Valuation of Servicing Assets — Refer to Notes 2, 5 and 7 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company measures Servicing Assets at fair value which are classified as Level 3 instruments. As of December 31, 2021, Servicing Assets were $9.8 million. The Company estimates the fair value using a discounted cash flow valuation methodology incorporating significant unobservable inputs and valuation assumptions that are reflective of management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instruments and requires significant management judgment or estimation. Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation methodology include the market servicing rate, discount rate, default rate and prepayment rate.
Auditing the significant unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value of Servicing Assets required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and an increased extend of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the valuation of Servicing Assets at fair value including unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value included the following key procedures:
We performed inquiries with management and the Company’s third-party valuation expert to understand the process for developing, and assumptions used in, the valuation model.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we developed an independent estimate of fair value and compared our estimate to the Company’s estimate.
We evaluated the reasonableness of the market rate of servicing assumption used in developing the fair value estimate of the Servicing Assets.
We tested the source information derived from the Company’s data used in the valuation model.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, CA
March 28, 2019 25, 2022
We have served as the Company's Auditorauditor since 2014

2014.

F-48F-49



Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(amounts in thousands)
December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Assets  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$11,163 $8,223 
Restricted Cash136,018 140,092 
Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value— 49 
Borrower Loans Receivable at Fair Value263,522 293,005 
Property and Equipment, Net6,426 7,953 
Servicing Assets15,550 14,598 
Other Assets323 125 
Total Assets$433,002 $464,045 
Liabilities and Member's Equity  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$4,690 $745 
Payable to Related Party1,283 2,889 
Payable to Investors127,253 132,112 
Notes at Fair Value264,003 293,948 
Other Liabilities4,528 3,985 
Total Liabilities401,757 433,679 
Member's Equity  
Member's Equity24,904 24,904 
Retained Earnings6,341 5,462 
Total Member's Equity31,245 30,366 
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity$433,002 $464,045 
December 31,
20212020
Assets:  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10,765 $8,592 
Restricted Cash157,111 132,332 
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value267,626 209,670 
Property and Equipment, Net7,907 6,928 
Servicing Assets9,796 11,088 
Other Assets317 217 
Total Assets$453,522 $368,827 
Liabilities and Member's Equity:  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$1,818 $2,361 
Payable to Related Party1,306 4,120 
Payable to Investors153,681 126,266 
Notes, at Fair Value265,985 208,379 
Other Liabilities2,434 2,613 
Total Liabilities425,224 343,739 
Member's Equity:  
Member's Equity11,404 11,404 
Retained Earnings16,894 13,684 
Total Member's Equity28,298 25,088 
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity$453,522 $368,827 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-50
F-49


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(amounts in thousands)
 Year ended December 31,
 201820172016
Revenues  
Operating Revenues  
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$105,709 $101,500 $36,630 
Servicing Fees, Net27,943 25,963 28,604 
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans(58,027)(48,691)3,637 
Other Revenues270 170 478 
Total Operating Revenues75,895 78,942 69,349 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans43,569 47,208 44,649 
Interest Expense on Notes(40,656)(43,954)(41,187)
Net Interest Income2,913 3,254 3,462 
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net(701)(514)(372)
Total Net Revenues78,107 81,682 72,439 
Expenses   
Administration Fee – Related Party70,491 70,359 62,203 
Servicing6,140 6,103 5,395 
General and Administrative597 379 1,321 
Other Expenses, Net— — 30,704 
Total Expenses77,228 76,841 99,623 
Total Net Income (Loss)$879 $4,841 $(27,184)
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Revenues:  
Operating Revenues:  
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$34,017 $21,618 $49,818 
Servicing Fees, Net15,770 20,791 26,368 
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans8,450 6,430 (5,058)
Other Revenue1,312 552 155 
Total Operating Revenues59,549 49,391 71,283 
Interest Income (Expense):
Interest Income on Borrower Loans36,952 36,765 41,146 
Interest Expense on Notes(34,514)(34,457)(38,492)
     Total Interest Income, Net2,438 2,308 2,654 
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net770 454 (375)
Total Net Revenues62,757 52,153 73,562 
Expenses:   
Administration Fee – Related Party52,641 45,472 62,575 
Servicing6,409 4,900 5,012 
General and Administrative497 380 33 
Total Expenses59,547 50,752 67,620 
Net Income$3,210 $1,401 $5,942 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-51
F-50


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity
(amounts in thousands)
Member’s
Equity
Retained Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
Total
Balance as of January 1, 2016$— $36,305 $36,305 
Distributions to Parent$— $(8,500)$(8,500)
Contributions by Parent$30,704 $— $30,704 
Net Income (Loss)$— $(27,184)$(27,184)
Balance as of December 31, 2016$30,704 $621 $31,325 
Distributions to Parent$(5,800)$— $(5,800)
Net Income$— $4,841 $4,841 
Balance as of December 31, 2017$24,904 $5,462 $30,366 
Net Income$— $879 $879 
Balance as of December 31, 2018$24,904 $6,341 $31,245 
Member’s
Equity
Retained EarningsTotal
Balance at January 1, 2019$24,904 $6,341 $31,245 
Distributions to Parent(9,000)— (9,000)
Net Income— 5,942 5,942 
Balance at December 31, 201915,904 12,283 28,187 
Distributions to Parent(4,500)— (4,500)
Net Income— 1,401 1,401 
Balance at December 31, 202011,404 13,684 25,088 
Distributions to Parent— — — 
Net Income— 3,210 3,210 
Balance at December 31, 2021$11,404 $16,894 $28,298 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-52
F-51


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(amounts in thousands)
For the For the Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
 201820172016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net Income (Loss)$879 $4,841 $(27,184)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:   
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes701 514 372 
Other Non-Cash Changes in Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes(239)86 176 
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(14,315)(14,138)(9,634)
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights13,316 11,862 10,620 
Depreciation and Amortization5,664 5,853 4,083 
Loss on Contract Termination— — 30,704 
Other, Net— — (128)
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:   
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value(2,365,431)(2,619,130)(1,979,952)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value2,365,470 2,619,709 1,979,352 
Other Assets(198)61 (64)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities3,945 (1,478)101 
Payable to Investors(4,859)(9,513)5,964 
Net Related Party Receivable/Payable(2,482)2,371 (1,260)
Other Liabilities590 2247 954 
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities3,041 3,285 14,104 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:   
Purchase of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value(177,101)(194,887)(217,582)
Principal Payment of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value175,117 192,054 173,710 
Purchase of Short Term Investments— — (1,280)
Maturities of Short Term Investments— 1,280 1,277 
Purchases of Property and Equipment(3,261)(5,092)(5,589)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(5,245)(6,645)(49,464)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:   
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes Held at Fair Value176,830 194,391 217,767 
Payments of Notes Held at Fair Value(175,760)(191,828)(173,958)
Cash Distributions to Parent— (5,800)(8,500)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities1,070 (3,237)35,309 
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents(1,134)(6,597)(51)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period148,315 154,912 154,963 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period$147,181 $148,315 $154,912 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:   
Cash Paid for Interest$41,098 $43,776 $40,597 
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net1,101 225 1,606 
Non-Cash Financing Activity, Contribution by Parent$— $— $30,704 
Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net Income$3,210 $1,401 $5,942 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:  
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(770)(454)374 
Other Non-Cash Changes in Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes26 46 (694)
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(9,020)(7,203)(13,033)
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights10,312 11,003 13,682 
Depreciation and Amortization4,878 4,149 4,397 
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:   
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value(1,712,705)(1,338,082)(2,320,560)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value1,712,705 1,338,082 2,320,560 
Other Assets(100)532 (426)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities(543)228 (2,557)
Payable to Investors27,415 20,979 (21,966)
Net Related Party Receivable/Payable(2,544)1,183 2,251 
Other Liabilities(179)(1,114)(789)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities32,685 30,750 (12,819)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:   
Purchase of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value(231,998)(133,644)(170,326)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value172,709 149,908 165,481 
Purchases of Property and Equipment(6,127)(3,270)(6,374)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities(65,416)12,994 (11,219)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:   
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes, at Fair Value231,933 133,228 171,138 
Payments of Notes, at Fair Value(172,250)(149,409)(167,420)
Cash Distributions to Parent— (4,500)(9,000)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities59,683 (20,681)(5,282)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash26,952 23,063 (29,320)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period140,924 117,861 147,181 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period$167,876 $140,924 $117,861 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:   
Cash Paid for Interest$34,682 $34,410 $39,229 
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net$234 $504 $246 
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10,765 $8,592 $7,462 
Restricted Cash157,111 132,332 110,399 
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$167,876 $140,924 $117,861 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-53

F-52


Prosper Funding
PROSPER FUNDING LLC
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. Basis of PresentationORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
Prosper Funding LLC (“PFL”) was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) as its sole equity member. Except as the context otherwise requires, as used in these Notes to consolidated financial statements of Prosper Funding LLC, “Prosper“PFL” and the “Company” refer to Prosper Funding” “we,” “us,” and “our” refers to PFL LLC and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a Delaware limited liability company, andsubsidiary, Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis.
PFL did not have any items of other comprehensive income (loss) during any of the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
PFL was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans and issue Notes through the marketplace. Although Prosper FundingPFL is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper FundingPFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. Prosper Funding’sPFL’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper FundingPFL will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. Prosper FundingPFL seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct entity from PMI.
Since February 1, 2013, all Notes issued and sold through the marketplace are issued, sold and serviced by PFL. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the marketplace, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the submission of Borrower Loan applications by potential borrowers, the origination of related Borrower Loans by WebBank and the funding of such Borrower Loans by WebBank. Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between PFL and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the marketplace on behalf of PFL. As a result Prosper FundingPFL earns significant revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, PMI.
A borrower who wishes to obtain a loan through the marketplace must post a loan listing, or listing on the marketplace. PFL allocates listings to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on PFL’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from PFL.
All loans requested and obtained through the marketplace are unsecured obligations of individual borrowers with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of December 31, 2018.2021. All loans made through the marketplace are funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank. After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to PFL, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan. WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.
Prosper Funding’s marketplace is designed to allow investors to invest in Borrower Loans in a transparent marketplace, with the aim of allowing both investors and borrowers to benefit financially as well as socially. Prosper Funding believes marketplace lending represents a new model of consumer lending, where individuals and institutions can earn the interest spread of a traditional consumer lender but must also assume the credit risk of a traditional consumer lender.
As of December 31, 2018, Prosper Funding’s2021, PFL’s marketplace was open to investors in 3130 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2018, Prosper Funding’s2021, PFL’s marketplace was open to borrowers in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Currently, the marketplace does not operate internationally.
F-53


NOTE 2. Significant Accounting PoliciesSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNT POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
Prosper Funding’sPFL’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PFL and its wholly-owned subsidiary, PAH.Prosper Depositor LLC. All intercompany balances and transactions between PFL and PAHProsper Depositor LLC have been eliminated in consolidation. Prosper Funding’sPFL’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
F-54


Use of Estimates
The preparation of Prosper Funding’sPFL’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StatesU.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, valuation of servicing rights, valuation of loan trailing fee liability, repurchase and indemnification obligation,obligations, and contingent liabilities. Prosper FundingPFL bases its estimates on historical experience from all Borrower Loans and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Certain Risks
In the normal course of its business, Prosper Funding encounters significant credit risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject Prosper Funding to significant credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, borrower loans held and restricted cash. Prosper Funding places cash and restricted cash with high-quality financial institutions and is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent the amount recorded on the balance sheet exceeds federally insured amounts. Prosper Funding invests cash equivalents in highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase, including money market funds, commercial paper, US treasury securities and US agency securities.
As a lending marketplace, Prosper Funding believes its customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact its customers’ ability or desire to participate on its marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect its business and results of operations.
To the extent that Borrower Loan (including Borrower Loans that have been sold) payments are not made, servicing income will be reduced. A group of Notes corresponding to a particular Borrower Loan is wholly dependent on the repayment of such Borrower Loan. As a result, Prosper Funding does not bear the credit risk on such Borrower Loan.  
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
The determination of whether to consolidate aA variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which we have a variable interest requires a significant amount of analysis and judgment whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE via a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest in a VIE exists if we have both the power to direct the VIE’s activities that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and a potentially significant economic interest in the VIE. The determination of whether an entity(VIE) is a VIE considers factors, such as (i) whether the entity’slegal entity that has either a total equity investment at riskthat is insufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) when a holder’swhose equity investment at risk lacks any ofinvestors lack the following characteristics of a controlling financial interest:interest. PFL’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in the direct or indirect ability through voting rights or similar rights to make decisions about a legal entity’s activities that have a significant effect onentity, which change with fluctuations in the fair value of the entity’s success,net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the legal entity. 
As a result of the nature of the retained servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, we are a variable interest holder in certain special purposes entitiesparty that purchase these Borrower Loans.   For all of these entities we either do not havehas both the power to direct the activities that most significantly affectimpact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or we do not have athe right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially
F-54


be significant economic interest into the VIE. In no case are wePFL consolidates a VIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. PFL assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary therefore, we do not consolidate these entities.   
Management regularly reviews and reconsiders its previous conclusions regarding the status of an entity as a VIE and whether we are required to consolidate such VIE in the consolidated financial statements.on an ongoing basis.
Transfers of Financial Assets
ProsperPFL accounts for transfers of entire financial assets or a participating interest in an entire financial asset as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from Prosper,PFL, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and ProsperPFL has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold significantunconditional call options and has not written significant put options on the transferred assets.
Prosper sells loans or participating interests in loans via whole loan sale transactions In assessing whether control has been surrendered, PFL considers whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the fractional Note channel. In certain instancesimpact of whole loan sales transactions Prosper will sell whole loans to unconsolidated VIEs that then securitizeall arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the whole loans purchased.
Prosper recognizes atransfer, even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer. PFL measures gain or loss on the sale of financial assets by comparingas the net sales proceeds (including fair value of any servicing asset or liability and recourse obligation recognized) toreceived on the sale less the carrying amount of the assetsloans sold. Transfers of financial assets that do not qualify for sale accounting are reported as secured borrowings. Accordingly, the related assets remain on Prosper’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and continue to be reported and accounted for as if the transfer had not occurred. CashThe net proceeds from these transfers are reported as liabilities, with related interest expense recognized over the life of the related assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consistsale represent the fair value of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturitiesany assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, US treasurytransaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and US agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificates of deposit accounts held as collateral as required for long term leases, loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper has on our marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets that sum to the total of the same such amount shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows:
December 31, 2018December 31, 2017December 31, 2016
Cash and Cash Equivalents $11,163 8,223 $6,929 
Restricted Cash 136,018 140,092 147,983 
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash show in the consolidated statements of cash flows $147,181 $148,315 $154,912 
Short Term Investments
Short term investments consists of certificates of deposit with a term greater than three months but less than a year that are held as collateral as required for loan funding and servicing activities.
F-55


recourse obligations.
Fair Value Measurement
Prosper Funding measures the fairFair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with its fair value hierarchy which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. We apply this framework whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value.
We define fair value in terms ofis the price that would be received upon the sale ofto sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial instruments consist principally of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Servicing Assets, Loan Trailing Fee Liability, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Payable to Investors and Notes. The price usedestimated fair values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, and Payable to measure theInvestors approximate their carrying values because of their short term nature.
The fair value hierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is not adjusted for transaction costs. Under ASC Topic 820,based on whether the fair value measurement also assumes that the transaction to sell an asset occurs in the principal market for the asset or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset. The principal market is the market in which Prosper Funding would sell or transfer the asset with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset. In determining the principal market for an asset or liability under ASC Topic 820, it is assumed that Prosper Funding has accessinputs to the market as of thevaluation methodology used for measurement date. If no market for the asset exists or if Prosper Funding does not have access to the principal market, Prosper Funding uses a hypothetical market.
Under ASC Topic 820, assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value:observable:
Level 1 — The valuation is based on quotedQuoted market prices in active markets for identical instruments.assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such asInputs other than quoted prices for similar instrumentsincluded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in marketsLevel 1 that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologiesobservable for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.asset or liability either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to theUnobservable inputs.
When developing fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow models, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation.
Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, which requires an entity to maximizemeasurements, PFL maximizes the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimizeminimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments PFL must utilize unobservable inputs whenin determining fair value due to the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identicalIn instances where there is limited or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active andno observable market data, for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value ismeasurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, Borrower Loans, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and Notes. Servicing assets and liabilities are also subject to fair value measurement within the financial statements of PFL. The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short term nature.
As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Notes, Prosper FundingServicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, PFL believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and NotesServicing Assets should be considered level 3 financial instruments under ASC Topic 820. Ininstruments. PFL primarily uses a hypothetical transaction as of the measurement date, Prosper Funding believes that differences in the principal marketplace in which the Borrower Loans are originated and the principal marketplace in which Prosper Funding might offer those loans may result in differences between the originated amount of the loans anddiscounted cash flow model to estimate their fair value as of the transaction date. For Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, the fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based uponkey assumptions used in valuation assumptions including prepayment speeds,include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and
F-55


discount rates based on estimates of the perceived credit risk within each credit grade.rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The obligation to pay principal and interest on any Noteseries of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to lendersinvestors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, the fair value of a groupseries of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower
F-56


Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursed to such Note holders.payments. As a result, the valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing ofin payments. Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations. The effective interest rate associated with a group of Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee. See
Refer to Note 47 for a roll-forwardadditional fair value disclosures.
Cash and further discussionCash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the significant assumptions used to valuetime of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificates of deposit accounts for loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or PFL have on the marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans and Notes.or disbursed to the investor.
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes
ThroughWith respect to the Note Channel, Prosper FundingPFL purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues Notesnotes, and holds the Borrower Loans as a receivable until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notes fundednotes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loan.Loans. Borrower Loansloans funded and Notes fundednotes issued through the Note Channel are carried on Prosper Funding’s consolidated balance sheetsPFL’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. Prosper chose to measure certain financial instruments
PFL places Borrower Loans and certain other items atLoans Held for Sale on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, PFL stops accruing interest and reverses all accrued but unpaid interest as of such date. Additionally, PFL charges-off Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for whichof loans 120 days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from debt sales in subsequent periods.
Management has elected the fair value option has been elected reportedfor Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Notes. Changes in earnings. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful forof Borrower Loans are largely offset by the readerschanges in fair value of Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent design of the financial statements as it allows both theNotes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are included in “Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
PFL primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to be valued using the same methodology. The fair value election, with respect to an item, may not be revoked once an election is made. Prosper Funding estimatesestimate the fair value of such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologiesNotes. The key assumptions used in valuation include default and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that take into account expected prepayments, losses, recoveries and default rates.   The Borrower Loans are not derecognized when a corresponding Note is issued as Prosper Funding maintains the ability to sell the Borrower Loans without the approvalreflect estimates of the holdersrates of the corresponding Notes.return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.  
Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper FundingPFL records servicing assets and liabilitiesServicing Assets at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when Prosper FundingPFL sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of servicing assets and liabilitiesServicing Assets is recognized in “Servicing Fees” revenue.revenue as Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in “GainGain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans”Loans while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing rate, is recorded in servicing assets or liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in “Servicing Assets” and “Other Liabilities,” respectively,Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Prosper FundingPFL uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan servicing assets or liabilitiesServicing Assets which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that Prosper FundingPFL earns on the Borrower Loans, estimated market servicing fees to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and the current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.  
Loans Held for Sale
F-56

Loans Held for Sale are comprised of Borrower Loans held for short durations and are recorded at fair value. The fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions similar to those of other Borrower Loans. We measure Loans Held for Sale at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings. Management believes that the fair value option is more meaningful for the readers of the financial statements and it allows for the Loans Held for Sale to be measured at fair value similar to Borrower Loans and Notes. The fair value election, with respect to an item, may not be revoked once an election is made.

SoftwareSEC Inquiry
In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and Website Developmentseasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors. Prosper was advised by the SEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. On April 19, 2019, the SEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million was paid in full in April 2019.
SoftwareWest Virginia Matter
In January 2018, the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and website development representspractices of PMI and PFL that the softwareAttorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and websiteProtection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to which Prosper responded with such information as was requested by the Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, Prosper received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that, PMI has transferred to Prosper Funding.   Prosper Funding does not developwithout in any way admitting that any of its own software or website. Software and website are includedprior practices were in property and equipment and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives which is generally one to five years. Prosper Funding evaluates its software assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measured by a comparisonviolation of the carryingConsumer Act, Prosper agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. Prosper is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.
We cannot predict the outcome of the matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been made.
No loans have been originated through the Prosper platform to West Virginians since June 2016.
NOTE 18. RELATED PARTIES
Since Prosper’s inception, it has engaged in various transactions with its directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of its voting securities, and with immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders. Prosper believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to Prosper than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Prosper’s executive officers, directors who are not executive officers, and certain affiliates participate in its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes. The aggregate amount of the asset toNotes purchased and the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generatedincome earned by the asset. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the
F-57F-46


impairmentparties deemed to be recognized is the excessaffiliates and related parties of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software and website development asset group.
Payable to Investors
Payable to Investors primarily represents our obligation to investors related to cash held in an accountProsper for the benefityear ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, as well as the Notes outstanding as of investorsDecember 31, 2021 and payments-in-process received from borrowers.2020 are summarized below (in thousands):
Aggregate Amount of Notes Purchased for the Year Ended December 31,Interest Earned on Notes for the Year Ended December 31,
 2021202020212020
Executive officers and management$35 $28 $$
Directors (excluding executive officers and management)24 272 43 
Total$59 $300 $$49 
Notes Balance as of
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Executive officers and management$41 $41 
Directors (excluding executive officers and management)15 — 
Total$56 $41 

Loan Trailing Fee
On July 1, 2016, NOTE 19. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Prosper Funding signedhas a series of agreements with WebBank which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the "Loan Trailing Fee") paid401(k) plan that covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to WebBankprovide tax-deferred retirement benefits in connectionaccordance with the performanceprovisions of each loan soldSection 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Prosper’s contributions to the plan are discretionary. During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, Prosper Funding. These agreements are effective as of August 1, 2016. The Loan Trailing Feecontributed $2.0 million, $1.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively, to the 401(k) plan.
NOTE 20. SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS
Prosper is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, asset managers, and investment funds to provide the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers offunds to allow WebBank to originate Borrower Loans that the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by Prosper Funding, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interestthird party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the performanceyear ended December 31, 2021, one individual party purchased 26.7% of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by Prosper Funding to WebBank over the term of the respectivesuch loans, and is a function of the principal and interest payments made by borrowersCompany’s Warehouse VIEs purchased 12.6% of such loans. InFor the event that principalyear ended December 31, 2020, two individual parties purchased 21.4% and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, Prosper Funding is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to Prosper Funding is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination14.3% of such loan within Other Liabilitiesloans, respectively, and recorded asthe Company’s Warehouse VIEs purchased 18.2% of such loans. These purchases reflect that a reductionsignificant portion of Transaction Fees, net. Any changes in the fair value of this liability are recorded in Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, NetProsper’s business is dependent on the statements of operations. The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates. 
Revenue Recognition
Revenue primarily results from fees, net interest earned and gains on the sale of borrower loans. Fees consist of related party administrative fees and servicing fees paid by investors. We also have other smaller sources of revenue reported as other revenue, which includes fees charged in relation to securitizations by outside investors.
Administration Agreement License Fees
Prosper Funding primarily generates revenues through license fees it earns through an Administration Agreement with PMI. The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by Prosper Funding to PMI that entitles PMI to use the platform for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and Note servicing and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding. The license fees are based on the number of listings that are posted to the platform.
Service Fees
Investors who purchase Borrower Loansfunding through the Whole Loan Channel, typically pay Prosper Funding a servicing feethrough which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper Funding for the costs incurred in servicing the related loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors88% and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper Funding records servicing fees paid by Borrower Loan investors as a component of operating revenue when received.
Gain (Loss) on Sale91% of Borrower Loans
Prosper Funding recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it is retained for the servicing of Borrower Loans by WebBank. Additionally, Prosper Funding recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. Gains or losses on sales of Borrower Loans that are recognized at the time of sale are determined by the difference between the net sales proceeds, fair value of any servicing rights retained and the carrying value of the Borrower Loans sold.
F-58


Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes
Prosper Funding recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans were originated through the Note Channel and interest expense on the corresponding Notes using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper Funding believes it to be collectable.
Administration Fee Expense - Related Party
Pursuant to the Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages the marketplace on behalf of Prosper Funding. Accordingly, each month, Prosper Funding is required to pay PMI an administration fee that is based on PMI’s (a) finance and legal personnel costs, (b) number of Borrower Loans originated through the marketplace, (c) servicing fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding. In addition, under a second Administration Agreement between PMI and PAH, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prosper Funding, PAH is required to pay PMI an annual fee, for PMI being the administrator of PAH’s operations.
Other Expense
Other expense, net includes contract termination costs that are expected to be non-recurring and not part of restructuring activities. 
Comprehensive Income
There is no comprehensive income (loss) other than the net income (loss) disclosed in the consolidated statements of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Adopted In The Current Period
In May 2014, as part of its ongoing efforts to assist in the convergence of US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The new guidance sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed in US GAAP. The underlying principle of the new standard is that a business or other organization will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not addressed completely in the prior accounting guidance. Prosper Funding adopted the requirements of the ASU as of January 1, 2018, utilizing the modified retrospective approach. Administration fees are included in the scope of the new guidance, while servicing fees and gain or loss on the sale of loans remain within the scope of ASC topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The impact of adopting the ASU is not significant to the consolidated financial statements in the current period.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-1, "Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Prosper Funding adopted the standard effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Prosper Funding’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The standard provides guidance for eight targeted changes with respect to how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statements of cash flows, with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. Prosper Funding adopted standard effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Prosper Funding’s consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (ASU 2016-18)", which requires companies to include amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents
F-59


in cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. Prosper Funding adopted standard effective January 1, 2018. Prosper Funding has $136.0 million and $140.1 million of restricted cash on its condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, whose cash flow statement classification changed to align with the new guidance.
Accounting Standards Issued, To Be Adopted By The Company In Future Periods
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement." Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for level 3 fair value measurements. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, but entities are permitted to early adopt either the entire standard or only the provisions that eliminate or modify the requirements. Prosper Funding is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its consolidated financial statements.
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
 December 31,
 20182017
Property and equipment:  
Internal-use software and web site development costs$22,505 $19,911 
Property and equipment22,505 19,911 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(16,079)(11,958)
Total property and equipment, net$6,426 $7,953 
Depreciation and amortization expense for 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $5.7 million, $5.9 million and $4.1 million respectively.  Internal-use software and web site development additions of $4.1 million, $3.7 million and $5.8 million were purchased from PMI in the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021 and 20162020, respectively.
4.Prosper receives all of its transaction fee revenue related to personal loans from WebBank. Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank for our services in facilitating originations of Borrower Loans Loans Held For Saleissued by WebBank. The rate of the transaction fee for each individual Borrower Loan is based on the term and Notes Held at Fair Value
The fair valuecredit grade of the Borrower Loans originatedLoan. No individual borrower or investor accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net revenue for any of the periods presented.    
NOTE 22. SEGMENTS
Our chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and Notes issuedevaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has a single reporting and operating segment.
NOTE 23. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated subsequent events or transactions occurring through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued and determined that no events or transactions, other than any items disclosed within the consolidated financial statements and related notes, are required to be disclosed herein.
F-47


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Prosper Funding LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Funding LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, member’s equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Emphasis of a Matter
As discussed in Note Channel1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company earns significant amounts of revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is estimatedto express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation of Borrower Loans — Refer to Notes 2, 4 and 7 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company measures Borrower Loans at fair value which are classified as Level 3 instruments. As of December 31, 2021, Borrower Loans were $267.6 million. The Company estimates the fair value using discounted cash flow valuation methodologies based upon a setincorporating significant unobservable inputs and valuation assumptions that are reflective of valuation assumptions.management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instruments and requires significant management judgment or estimate. The primarymain assumptions used to value suchthe Borrower Loans and Notes include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance market conditions and discount rates applied to each credit grade of the loans.
Auditing the methodology and unobservable inputs, specifically, the unobservable inputs related to the discount rate, default rate and prepayment rate, used by management to estimate the fair value of Borrower Loans required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
F-48


Our audit procedures related to the valuation of Borrower Loans, at fair value including unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value included the following key procedures:
We performed inquiries with management and the Company’s third-party valuation expert to understand the process for developing, and assumptions used in, the valuation model.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we developed independent estimates of fair value and compared our estimates to the Company’s estimates.
We tested the source information derived from the Company’s data used in the valuation models.
Valuation of Servicing Assets — Refer to Notes 2, 5 and 7 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company measures Servicing Assets at fair value which are classified as Level 3 instruments. As of December 31, 2021, Servicing Assets were $9.8 million. The Company estimates the fair value using a discounted cash flow valuation methodology incorporating significant unobservable inputs and valuation assumptions that are reflective of management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instruments and requires significant management judgment or estimation. Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation methodology include the market servicing rate, discount rate, default rate and prepayment rate.
Auditing the significant unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value of Servicing Assets required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and an increased extend of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the valuation of Servicing Assets at fair value including unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value included the following key procedures:
We performed inquiries with management and the Company’s third-party valuation expert to understand the process for developing, and assumptions used in, the valuation model.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we developed an independent estimate of fair value and compared our estimate to the Company’s estimate.
We evaluated the reasonableness of the market rate of servicing assumption used in developing the fair value estimate of the Servicing Assets.
We tested the source information derived from the Company’s data used in the valuation model.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, CA
March 25, 2022
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2014.

F-49



Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(amounts in thousands)
December 31,
20212020
Assets:  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10,765 $8,592 
Restricted Cash157,111 132,332 
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value267,626 209,670 
Property and Equipment, Net7,907 6,928 
Servicing Assets9,796 11,088 
Other Assets317 217 
Total Assets$453,522 $368,827 
Liabilities and Member's Equity:  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$1,818 $2,361 
Payable to Related Party1,306 4,120 
Payable to Investors153,681 126,266 
Notes, at Fair Value265,985 208,379 
Other Liabilities2,434 2,613 
Total Liabilities425,224 343,739 
Member's Equity:  
Member's Equity11,404 11,404 
Retained Earnings16,894 13,684 
Total Member's Equity28,298 25,088 
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity$453,522 $368,827 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-50


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(amounts in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Revenues:  
Operating Revenues:  
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$34,017 $21,618 $49,818 
Servicing Fees, Net15,770 20,791 26,368 
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans8,450 6,430 (5,058)
Other Revenue1,312 552 155 
Total Operating Revenues59,549 49,391 71,283 
Interest Income (Expense):
Interest Income on Borrower Loans36,952 36,765 41,146 
Interest Expense on Notes(34,514)(34,457)(38,492)
     Total Interest Income, Net2,438 2,308 2,654 
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net770 454 (375)
Total Net Revenues62,757 52,153 73,562 
Expenses:   
Administration Fee – Related Party52,641 45,472 62,575 
Servicing6,409 4,900 5,012 
General and Administrative497 380 33 
Total Expenses59,547 50,752 67,620 
Net Income$3,210 $1,401 $5,942 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-51


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity
(amounts in thousands)
Member’s
Equity
Retained EarningsTotal
Balance at January 1, 2019$24,904 $6,341 $31,245 
Distributions to Parent(9,000)— (9,000)
Net Income— 5,942 5,942 
Balance at December 31, 201915,904 12,283 28,187 
Distributions to Parent(4,500)— (4,500)
Net Income— 1,401 1,401 
Balance at December 31, 202011,404 13,684 25,088 
Distributions to Parent— — — 
Net Income— 3,210 3,210 
Balance at December 31, 2021$11,404 $16,894 $28,298 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-52


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net Income$3,210 $1,401 $5,942 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:  
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(770)(454)374 
Other Non-Cash Changes in Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes26 46 (694)
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(9,020)(7,203)(13,033)
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights10,312 11,003 13,682 
Depreciation and Amortization4,878 4,149 4,397 
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:   
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value(1,712,705)(1,338,082)(2,320,560)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value1,712,705 1,338,082 2,320,560 
Other Assets(100)532 (426)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities(543)228 (2,557)
Payable to Investors27,415 20,979 (21,966)
Net Related Party Receivable/Payable(2,544)1,183 2,251 
Other Liabilities(179)(1,114)(789)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities32,685 30,750 (12,819)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:   
Purchase of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value(231,998)(133,644)(170,326)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value172,709 149,908 165,481 
Purchases of Property and Equipment(6,127)(3,270)(6,374)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities(65,416)12,994 (11,219)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:   
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes, at Fair Value231,933 133,228 171,138 
Payments of Notes, at Fair Value(172,250)(149,409)(167,420)
Cash Distributions to Parent— (4,500)(9,000)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities59,683 (20,681)(5,282)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash26,952 23,063 (29,320)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period140,924 117,861 147,181 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period$167,876 $140,924 $117,861 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:   
Cash Paid for Interest$34,682 $34,410 $39,229 
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net$234 $504 $246 
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10,765 $8,592 $7,462 
Restricted Cash157,111 132,332 110,399 
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$167,876 $140,924 $117,861 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-53



PROSPER FUNDING LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
Prosper Funding LLC was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) as its sole equity member. Except as the context otherwise requires, as used in these Notes to consolidated financial statements of Prosper Funding LLC, “PFL” and the “Company” refer to Prosper Funding LLC and its wholly owned subsidiary, Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis.
PFL did not have any items of other comprehensive income (loss) during any of the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
PFL was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans and issue Notes through the marketplace. Although PFL is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. PFL’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that PFL will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. PFL seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct entity from PMI.
Since February 1, 2013, all Notes issued and sold through the marketplace are issued, sold and serviced by PFL. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the marketplace, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the submission of Borrower Loan applications by potential borrowers, the origination of related Borrower Loans by WebBank and the funding of such Borrower Loans by WebBank. Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between PFL and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the marketplace on behalf of PFL. As a result PFL earns significant revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, PMI.
A borrower who wishes to obtain a loan through the marketplace must post a loan listing on the marketplace. PFL allocates listings to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on PFL’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from PFL.
All loans requested and obtained through the marketplace are unsecured obligations of individual borrowers with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of December 31, 2021. All loans made through the marketplace are funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank. After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to PFL, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan. WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.
As of December 31, 2021, PFL’s marketplace was open to investors in 30 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2021, PFL’s marketplace was open to borrowers in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Currently, the marketplace does not operate internationally.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNT POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
PFL’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PFL and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Prosper Depositor LLC. All intercompany balances and transactions between PFL and Prosper Depositor LLC have been eliminated in consolidation. PFL’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
F-54


Use of Estimates
The preparation of PFL’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, valuation of servicing rights, valuation of loan trailing fee liability, repurchase obligations, and contingent liabilities. PFL bases its estimates on historical experience from all Borrower Loans and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from estimates.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
A variable interest entity (VIE) is a legal entity that has either a total equity investment that is insufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. PFL’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in the entity, which change with fluctuations in the fair value of the entity’s net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. PFL consolidates a VIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. PFL assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an ongoing basis.
Transfers of Financial Assets
PFL accounts for transfers of financial assets as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from PFL, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and PFL has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold unconditional call options and has not written put options on the transferred assets. In assessing whether control has been surrendered, PFL considers whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the impact of all arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the transfer, even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer. PFL measures gain or loss on sale of financial assets as the net proceeds received on the sale less the carrying amount of the loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and recourse obligations.
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial instruments consist principally of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Servicing Assets, Loan Trailing Fee Liability, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Payable to Investors and Notes. The estimated fair values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, and Payable to Investors approximate their carrying values because of their short term nature.
The fair value hierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is based on whether the perceived credit risk. inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable:
Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs.
When developing fair value measurements, PFL maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments PFL must utilize unobservable inputs in determining fair value due to the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. In instances where there is limited or no observable market data, fair value measurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Servicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, PFL believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Servicing Assets should be considered level 3 financial instruments. PFL primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate their fair value and key assumptions used in valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and
F-55


discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the servicing fee.outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to investors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, the fair value of thea series of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel,Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursed topayments. As a result, the Note holders.valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing in payments. Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations. The effective interest rate associated with a seriesgroup of Notes will beis less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee.
At December 31, 2018Refer to Note 7 for additional fair value disclosures.
Cash and 2017,Cash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificates of deposit accounts for loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or PFL have on the marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans Notes andor disbursed to the investor.
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale (in thousands) were:and Notes
 Borrower LoansNotesLoans Held for Sale
 December 31, 2018December 31, 2017December 31, 2018December 31, 2017December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Aggregate principal balance
   outstanding
$269,093 $296,668 $(272,430)$(300,922)$— $59 
Fair value adjustments(5,571)(3,663)8,427 6,974 — (10)
Fair value$263,522 $293,005 $(264,003)$(293,948)$— $49 
F-60


At December 31, 2018, outstandingWith respect to the Note Channel, PFL purchases Borrower Loans had original maturities between 36from WebBank then issues notes, and 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31%holds the Borrower Loans as a receivable until maturity. The obligation to 31.92%repay a series of notes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans. Borrower loans funded and had various maturity datesnotes issued through December 2023. At December 31, 2017, outstandingthe Note Channel are carried on PFL’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. 
PFL places Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale had maturitieson non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, PFL stops accruing interest and reverses all accrued but unpaid interest as of either 36 months or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates rangingsuch date. Additionally, PFL charges-off Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value of loans 120 days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from 5.31% to 32.32%debt sales in subsequent periods.
Management has elected the fair value option for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and had various maturity dates through December 31, 2022.
Within the changeNotes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans Prosper Funding recorded a loss of approximately $0.8 million that is attributable toare largely offset by the changes in the credit risks related to Borrower Loans during the year ending December 31, 2018.
As of December 31, 2018, Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amount of $2.5 million and a fair value of $1.1 million. AsNotes due to the borrower payment-dependent design of December 31, 2017, Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amount of $3.5 million and athe Notes. Changes in fair value of $1.3 million. Prosper Funding places loans on non-accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Borrower Loans in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
5. Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities
Prosper Funding accounts for servicing assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values with changes in fair values recorded in servicing fees. The initial asset or liability is recognized when Prosper Funding sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers through the Whole Loan Channel and the servicing rights are retained. The total losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans were $58.0 million and $48.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The total gains recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans was $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
At December 31, 2018, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper Funding retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.7 billion, original terms of either 36 or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 35.52% and various maturity dates through December 2023.  At December 31, 2017, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper Funding retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.7 billion, original terms of either 36 or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 35.52% and various maturity dates through December 2022.
$44.0 million, $38.5 million and $38.2 million of contractually specified servicing fees, late charges and ancillary fees are included on our Statement of Operations in Servicing Fees, Net for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 respectively.  
Fair Value
Valuation Method – Prosper Funding uses a discounted cash flow valuation methodology generally consisting of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the table within Note 6 are those that Prosper Funding considers significant to the estimated fair values of the level 3 servicing assets and liabilities. The following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.  
Market Servicing Rate – Prosper Funding estimates adequate market servicing rates that would fairly compensate a substitute servicer should one be required, which includes the profit that would be demanded in the marketplace. This rate is stated as a fixed percentage of outstanding principal balance on a per annum basis. Prosper Funding estimated these market servicing rates based on observable market rates for other loan types in the industry and bids from subservicing providers, adjusted for the unique loan attributes that are present in the specific loans that Prosper Funding sells and services and information from a backup service provider.
Discount Rate – The discount rate is a rate of return used to discount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, which represents the fair value of the loan servicing rights. We used a range of discount rates for the servicing assets and liabilities based on comparable observed valuations of similar assets and publicly available disclosures related to servicing valuations, with comparability adjustments made to account for differences with Prosper Funding’s servicing assets.
F-61


Default Rate – The default rate presented in Note 6 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e., risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional default rate curves for each credit grade or Borrower Loan category. Each point on a particular Borrower Loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to default per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. The assumption regarding defaults directly reduces servicing revenues because the amount of servicing revenues received is based on the amount collected each period.
Prepayment Rate – The prepayment rate presented in Note 6 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e., risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional prepayment rate curves for each credit grade or Borrower Loan category. Each point on a particular Borrower Loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to prepay per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans.  Prepayments reduce servicing revenues as they shorten the period over which we expect to collect fees on the Borrower Loans, which is used to project future servicing revenues.
6. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

For a description of the fair value hierarchy and Prosper Funding’s fair value methodologies, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Prosper Funding did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of level 3 during the year ended December 31, 2018. 

Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are estimated usingincluded in “Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
PFL primarily uses a discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a setmodel to estimate the fair value of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and NotesNotes. The key assumptions used in valuation include default and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates appliedthat reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.  
Servicing Assets
PFL records Servicing Assets at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when PFL sells Borrower Loans to each credit gradeunrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of Servicing Assets is recognized in revenue as Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade.degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing rate, is recorded in Servicing Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following tables presentPFL uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value hierarchy for assetsof Servicing Assets which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that PFL earns on the Borrower Loans, estimated market servicing fees to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands):
December 31, 2018
Level 1
Inputs
Level 2
Inputs
Level 3
Inputs
Fair Value
Assets    
Borrower Loans$— $— $263,522 $263,522 
Servicing Assets— — 15,550 $15,550 
Total Assets— — 279,072 279,072 
Liabilities    
Notes$— $— $264,003 $264,003 
Servicing Liabilities— — 12 12 
Loan Trailing Fee Liability— — 3,118 3,118 
Total Liabilities$— $— $267,133 $267,133 

the current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.  
F-62F-56


December 31, 2017
Level 1
Inputs
Level 2
Inputs
Level 3
Inputs
Fair Value
Assets    
Borrower Loans$— $— $293,005 $293,005 
Servicing Assets— — 14,598 14,598 
Loans Held for Sale— — 49 49 
Total Assets— — 307,652 307,652 
Liabilities    
Notes$— $— $293,948 $293,948 
Servicing Liabilities— — 59 59 
Loan Trailing Fee Liability— — 2,595 2,595 
Total Liabilities— — 296,602 296,602 
As Prosper Funding’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes and loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosper Funding uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.
Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper Funding’s level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2018:
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes:
Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Discount rate4.7% - 13.8%4.0% - 14.4%
Default rate2.0% - 15.8%2.0% - 15.4%
Servicing Assets:
 Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Discount rate15.0% - 25.0%15.0% - 25.0%
Default rate1.6% - 16.7%1.5% - 16.1%
Prepayment rate15.5% - 25.1%13.5% - 30.2%
Market servicing rate (1)
0.625 %0.625 %
(1) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 8 basis points and 7 basis points for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 70.5 basis points and 69.5 basis points respectively.
F-63


Loan Trailing Fee Liability:
Range
Unobservable InputDecember 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Discount rate15.0% - 25.0%15.0% - 25.0%
Default rate1.6% - 16.7%1.5% - 16.1%
Prepayment rate15.5% - 25.1%13.5% - 30.2%
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. As demonstrated in the following table, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and because the principal balances of the Borrower Loans approximated the principal balances of the Notes.
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, which are level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (in thousands): 
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 Borrower LoansNotes
Loans
Held for
Sale
Total
Balance at January 1, Balance at January 1, 2018$293,005 $(293,948)$49 $(894)
Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes177,101 (176,830)2,365,431 2,365,702 
Principal repayments(171,427)175,760 (20)4,313 
Borrower loans sold to third parties(3,690)— (2,365,450)(2,369,140)
Other changes(202)441 — 239 
Change in fair value(31,265)30,574 (10)(701)
Balance at December 31, 2018$263,522 $(264,003)$— $(481)

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 Borrower LoansNotes
Loans
Held for
Sale
Total
Balance at January 1, Balance at January 1, 2017$315,627 $(316,236)$624 $15 
Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes194,887 (194,391)2,619,130 2,619,626 
Principal repayments(188,199)191,828 (89)3,540 
Borrower loans sold to third parties(3,855)— (2,619,620)(2,623,475)
Other changes97 (180)(3)(86)
Change in fair value(25,552)25,031 (514)
Balance at December 31, 2017$293,005 $(293,948)$49 $(894)
F-64


The following table presents additional information about level 3 servicing assets recorded at fair value (in thousands):
Servicing
Assets
Fair Value at January 1, 2017$12,461 
Additions14,138 
Less: Changes in fair value(12,001)
Balance at December 31, 2017$14,598 
Additions14,315 
Less: Changes in fair value(13,363)
Fair Value at December 31, 2018$15,550 

Loan Trailing Fee
The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates using a discounted cash flow model.
The following table presents additional information about level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
Balance at January 1, 2017$665 
Issuances2,631 
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(956)
Change in fair value$255 
Balance at December 31, 2017$2,595 
Issuances$2,524 
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee$(2,494)
Change in fair value$493 
Balance at December 31, 2018$3,118 
Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity
Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 2018 for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes funded are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):
F-65


 Borrower Loans Notes 
Fair Value at December 31, 2018 $263,522 $264,003 
Discount rate assumption:8.34 %*8.34 %*
Resulting fair value from:    
100 basis point increase$261,019  $261,492  
200 basis point increase258,577  259,041  
Resulting fair value from:    
100 basis point decrease$266,086  $266,576  
200 basis point decrease268,716  269,215  
Default rate assumption:13.02 %*13.02 %*
Resulting fair value from:    
100 basis point increase$260,270  $260,729  
200 basis point increase257,130  257,568  
Resulting fair value from:    
100 basis point decrease$266,799  $267,303  
200 basis point decrease270,102  270,629  
* Represents weighted average assumptions considering all credit grades.
The following table presents the estimated impact on Prosper Funding’s estimated fair value of servicing assets, calculated using different market servicing rates and different default rates as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands, except percentages).
Servicing
Assets
Fair Value at December 31, 2018 $15,550 
Market servicing rate assumptions0.625 %
Resulting fair value from:
Market servicing rate increase to 0.65%14,590 
Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60%16,510 
Weighted average prepayment assumptions20.08 %
Resulting fair value from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate15,366 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate15,736 
Weighted average default assumptions12.63 %
Resulting fair value from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate15,365 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate15,739 
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects.
F-66


7. Income Taxes
Prosper Funding incurred no income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Prosper Funding is a US disregarded entity and the loss is included in the return of its parent, PMI. Since PMI is in a loss position, not currently subject to income taxes, and has fully reserved its deferred tax asset, the net effective tax rate for Prosper Funding is 0%.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of its operations, Prosper Funding becomes involved in various legal actions. Prosper Funding maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. Prosper Funding does not believe it is probable that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any such matters will have a material effect on Prosper Funding's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Operating Commitments
Prosper has entered into an agreement with WebBank, under which all Borrower Loans originated through the marketplace are made by WebBank under its bank charter. On February 1, 2019, Prosper and WebBank extended the terms of their Agreement. See Footnote 11. Pursuant to the agreement, the marketing fee that Prosper receives in connection with the origination of each loan is partially reduced by an amount (the “Designated Amount”) calculated as a percentage of the principal amount of such loan based on the aggregate principal amount of loans originated for the applicable month.  To the extent the aggregate Designated Amount for all loans originated during any month is less than $143,500, Prosper is required to pay WebBank an amount equal to such deficiency. Accordingly, the minimum fee is $1.7 million for the years ended 2019, 2020 and 2021. The minimum fee is $0.1 million for the year ended 2022. Additionally, under the agreement with WebBank, Prosper is required to maintain minimum net liquidity of $15 million at all times during the term of the agreement. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. Violation of this covenant can result in termination of the contract with WebBank. At December 31, 2018 the Company was in compliance with the covenant.
Loan Purchase Commitments
Under the terms of Prosper Funding's agreement with WebBank, Prosper Funding is committed to purchase $25.9 million of Borrower Loans that WebBank originated during the last two business days of the year ended December 31, 2018 and first business day of the quarter ending March 31, 2019. Prosper Funding will purchase these Borrower Loans within the first three business days of the quarter ending March 31, 2019.
Repurchase and Indemnification Contingency
Under the terms of the loan purchase agreements between Prosper Funding and investors that participate in the Whole Loan Channel, Prosper Funding may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Borrower Loan from an investor. Generally, these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding protocols, or a violation of the applicable federal, state, or local lending laws. The fair value of the indemnification and repurchase obligation is estimated based on historical experience. Prosper Funding recognizes a liability for the repurchase and indemnification obligation when the Borrower Loans are issued. Indemnified or repurchased Borrower Loans associated with violations of federal, state, or local lending laws or verifiable identity theft are written off at the time of repurchase or at the time an indemnification payment is made.  The maximum potential amount of future payments associated under this obligation is the outstanding balances of the Borrower Loans issued through the Whole Loan Channel, which at December 31, 2018 is $3.7 billion.  Prosper Funding had accrued $0.9 million and $0.8 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 respectively in regard to this obligation.
Regulatory Contingencies
Prosper Funding accrues for contingencies when a loss from such contingencies is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss is probable and if it is possible to quantify the amount of the estimated loss, Prosper Funding reviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on at least a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If Prosper Funding determines that an unfavorable outcome is not probable or that the amount of a loss cannot be reasonably estimated, Prosper Funding does not accrue for a potential litigation loss. If
F-67


an unfavorable outcome is probable and Prosper Funding can estimate a range of outcomes, we record the amount we consider to be the best estimate within the range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if we cannot quantify the amount of the estimated loss, then we record the low end of the range of those potential losses.
SEC Inquiry
In MayApril 2017, Prosper notified Note investors that we had recently becomebecame aware of an error in the manner in which we calculated the annualized net return (“ANR”) and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors. The Company promptly provided Note investors with current, corrected ANR and seasoned ANR calculations. The staff ofProsper was advised by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) conducted an investigation as toSEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. PFL fully and voluntarily cooperated withOn April 19, 2019, the investigation and recently madeSEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter withmatter. Under the SEC. The proposed settlement, would be entered into by PFL without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings and would resolve anSEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of 1933. Under the terms of the proposed settlement,that provision. PFL wouldneither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3$3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million and agree not to commit or cause any future violations of Section 17(a)was paid in full in April 2019.
West Virginia Matter
In January 2018, the Attorney General of the Securities Act. The proposed settlement remains subjectState of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and practices of PMI and PFL that the Attorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to approvalwhich Prosper responded with such information as was requested by the SEC’s Commissioners.Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, Prosper received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that, without in any way admitting that any of its prior practices were in violation of the Consumer Act, Prosper agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. Prosper is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.
The proposed penaltyWe cannot predict the outcome of $3 millionthe matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been accrued as of December 31, 2018 in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities onmade.
No loans have been originated through the Consolidated Balance Sheet; it is offset completely by a reduction in PayableProsper platform to Related Party on the Balance Sheet as PFL is indemnified for these costs under the Administration Agreement.    West Virginians since June 2016.
9. Related PartiesNOTE 18. RELATED PARTIES
Since Prosper’s inception, Prosper Fundingit has engaged in various transactions with its directors, executive officers sole member, and holders of more than 10% of its voting securities, and with immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and sole member.10% stockholders. Prosper Funding believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to Prosper Funding than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Prosper Funding’sProsper’s executive officers, and directors who are not executive officers, and certain affiliates participate in its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes and Borrower Loans.Notes. The aggregate amount of the Notes and Borrower Loans purchased and the income earned by
F-46


parties deemed to be affiliates and related parties of Prosper Fundingfor the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, as well as the Notes outstanding as of December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 are summarized below (in thousands):
Aggregate Amount ofInterest Earned onAggregate Amount of Notes Purchased for the Year Ended December 31,Interest Earned on Notes for the Year Ended December 31,
Related PartyNotes and Borrower LoansNotes and Borrower Loans
2018201720182017 2021202020212020
Executive officers and managementExecutive officers and management$29 $29 $$109 Executive officers and management$35 $28 $$
Directors (excluding executive officers and management)Directors (excluding executive officers and management)— — — — Directors (excluding executive officers and management)24 272 43 
TotalTotal$29 $29 $$109 Total$59 $300 $$49 

Related PartyNote and Borrower Loan Balance as of December 31,
Notes Balance as of
20182017 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Executive officers and managementExecutive officers and management$32 $38 Executive officers and management$41 $41 
Directors (excluding executive officers and management)Directors (excluding executive officers and management)— — Directors (excluding executive officers and management)15 — 
TotalTotal$32 $38 Total$56 $41 

F-68


10. Significant ConcentrationsNOTE 19. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Prosper Fundinghas a 401(k) plan that covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Prosper’s contributions to the plan are discretionary. During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, Prosper contributed $2.0 million, $1.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively, to the 401(k) plan.
NOTE 20. SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS
Prosper is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, asset managers, and investment funds to provide the fundingfunds to allow WebBank to originate loansBorrower Loans that the third party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2018, the largest2021, one individual party purchased a total26.7% of 44%such loans, and the Company’s Warehouse VIEs purchased 12.6% of thosesuch loans. This compares to 70% forFor the year ended December 31, 2017. Further,2020, two individual parties purchased 21.4% and 14.3% of such loans, respectively, and the Company’s Warehouse VIEs purchased 18.2% of such loans. These purchases reflect that a significant portion of ourProsper’s business is dependent on funding through the Whole Loan Channel. 94%Channel, through which 88% and 93%91% of Borrower Loans were originated in the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Prosper receives all of its transaction fee revenue related to personal loans from WebBank. Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank for our services in facilitating originations of Borrower Loans issued by WebBank. The rate of the transaction fee for each individual Borrower Loan is based on the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan. No individual borrower or investor accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net revenue for any of the periods presented.    
NOTE 22. SEGMENTS
Our chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has a single reporting and operating segment.
NOTE 23. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated subsequent events or transactions occurring through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued and determined that no events or transactions, other than any items disclosed within the consolidated financial statements and related notes, are required to be disclosed herein.
F-47


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Prosper Funding LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Funding LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, member’s equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Emphasis of a Matter
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company earns significant amounts of revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation of Borrower Loans — Refer to Notes 2, 4 and 7 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company measures Borrower Loans at fair value which are classified as Level 3 instruments. As of December 31, 2021, Borrower Loans were $267.6 million. The Company estimates the fair value using discounted cash flow valuation methodologies incorporating significant unobservable inputs and valuation assumptions that are reflective of management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instruments and requires significant management judgment or estimate. The main assumptions used to value the Borrower Loans include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade of the loans.
Auditing the methodology and unobservable inputs, specifically, the unobservable inputs related to the discount rate, default rate and prepayment rate, used by management to estimate the fair value of Borrower Loans required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
F-48


Our audit procedures related to the valuation of Borrower Loans, at fair value including unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value included the following key procedures:
We performed inquiries with management and the Company’s third-party valuation expert to understand the process for developing, and assumptions used in, the valuation model.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we developed independent estimates of fair value and compared our estimates to the Company’s estimates.
We tested the source information derived from the Company’s data used in the valuation models.
Valuation of Servicing Assets — Refer to Notes 2, 5 and 7 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company measures Servicing Assets at fair value which are classified as Level 3 instruments. As of December 31, 2021, Servicing Assets were $9.8 million. The Company estimates the fair value using a discounted cash flow valuation methodology incorporating significant unobservable inputs and valuation assumptions that are reflective of management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instruments and requires significant management judgment or estimation. Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation methodology include the market servicing rate, discount rate, default rate and prepayment rate.
Auditing the significant unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value of Servicing Assets required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity and an increased extend of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the valuation of Servicing Assets at fair value including unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value included the following key procedures:
We performed inquiries with management and the Company’s third-party valuation expert to understand the process for developing, and assumptions used in, the valuation model.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we developed an independent estimate of fair value and compared our estimate to the Company’s estimate.
We evaluated the reasonableness of the market rate of servicing assumption used in developing the fair value estimate of the Servicing Assets.
We tested the source information derived from the Company’s data used in the valuation model.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, CA
March 25, 2022
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2014.

F-49



Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(amounts in thousands)
December 31,
20212020
Assets:  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10,765 $8,592 
Restricted Cash157,111 132,332 
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value267,626 209,670 
Property and Equipment, Net7,907 6,928 
Servicing Assets9,796 11,088 
Other Assets317 217 
Total Assets$453,522 $368,827 
Liabilities and Member's Equity:  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities$1,818 $2,361 
Payable to Related Party1,306 4,120 
Payable to Investors153,681 126,266 
Notes, at Fair Value265,985 208,379 
Other Liabilities2,434 2,613 
Total Liabilities425,224 343,739 
Member's Equity:  
Member's Equity11,404 11,404 
Retained Earnings16,894 13,684 
Total Member's Equity28,298 25,088 
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity$453,522 $368,827 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-50


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(amounts in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Revenues:  
Operating Revenues:  
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party$34,017 $21,618 $49,818 
Servicing Fees, Net15,770 20,791 26,368 
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans8,450 6,430 (5,058)
Other Revenue1,312 552 155 
Total Operating Revenues59,549 49,391 71,283 
Interest Income (Expense):
Interest Income on Borrower Loans36,952 36,765 41,146 
Interest Expense on Notes(34,514)(34,457)(38,492)
     Total Interest Income, Net2,438 2,308 2,654 
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net770 454 (375)
Total Net Revenues62,757 52,153 73,562 
Expenses:   
Administration Fee – Related Party52,641 45,472 62,575 
Servicing6,409 4,900 5,012 
General and Administrative497 380 33 
Total Expenses59,547 50,752 67,620 
Net Income$3,210 $1,401 $5,942 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-51


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity
(amounts in thousands)
Member’s
Equity
Retained EarningsTotal
Balance at January 1, 2019$24,904 $6,341 $31,245 
Distributions to Parent(9,000)— (9,000)
Net Income— 5,942 5,942 
Balance at December 31, 201915,904 12,283 28,187 
Distributions to Parent(4,500)— (4,500)
Net Income— 1,401 1,401 
Balance at December 31, 202011,404 13,684 25,088 
Distributions to Parent— — — 
Net Income— 3,210 3,210 
Balance at December 31, 2021$11,404 $16,894 $28,298 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-52


Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net Income$3,210 $1,401 $5,942 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:  
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net(770)(454)374 
Other Non-Cash Changes in Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes26 46 (694)
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans(9,020)(7,203)(13,033)
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights10,312 11,003 13,682 
Depreciation and Amortization4,878 4,149 4,397 
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:   
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value(1,712,705)(1,338,082)(2,320,560)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value1,712,705 1,338,082 2,320,560 
Other Assets(100)532 (426)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities(543)228 (2,557)
Payable to Investors27,415 20,979 (21,966)
Net Related Party Receivable/Payable(2,544)1,183 2,251 
Other Liabilities(179)(1,114)(789)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities32,685 30,750 (12,819)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:   
Purchase of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value(231,998)(133,644)(170,326)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value172,709 149,908 165,481 
Purchases of Property and Equipment(6,127)(3,270)(6,374)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities(65,416)12,994 (11,219)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:   
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes, at Fair Value231,933 133,228 171,138 
Payments of Notes, at Fair Value(172,250)(149,409)(167,420)
Cash Distributions to Parent— (4,500)(9,000)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities59,683 (20,681)(5,282)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash26,952 23,063 (29,320)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period140,924 117,861 147,181 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period$167,876 $140,924 $117,861 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:   
Cash Paid for Interest$34,682 $34,410 $39,229 
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net$234 $504 $246 
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10,765 $8,592 $7,462 
Restricted Cash157,111 132,332 110,399 
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$167,876 $140,924 $117,861 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-53



PROSPER FUNDING LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
Prosper Funding LLC was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) as its sole equity member. Except as the context otherwise requires, as used in these Notes to consolidated financial statements of Prosper Funding LLC, “PFL” and the “Company” refer to Prosper Funding LLC and its wholly owned subsidiary, Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis.
PFL did not have any items of other comprehensive income (loss) during any of the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
PFL was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans and issue Notes through the marketplace. Although PFL is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. PFL’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that PFL will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. PFL seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct entity from PMI.
Since February 1, 2013, all Notes issued and sold through the marketplace are issued, sold and serviced by PFL. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the marketplace, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the submission of Borrower Loan applications by potential borrowers, the origination of related Borrower Loans by WebBank and the funding of such Borrower Loans by WebBank. Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between PFL and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the marketplace on behalf of PFL. As a result PFL earns significant revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, PMI.
A borrower who wishes to obtain a loan through the marketplace must post a loan listing on the marketplace. PFL allocates listings to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on PFL’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from PFL.
All loans requested and obtained through the marketplace are unsecured obligations of individual borrowers with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of December 31, 2021. All loans made through the marketplace are funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank. After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to PFL, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan. WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.
As of December 31, 2021, PFL’s marketplace was open to investors in 30 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2021, PFL’s marketplace was open to borrowers in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Currently, the marketplace does not operate internationally.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNT POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
PFL’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PFL and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Prosper Depositor LLC. All intercompany balances and transactions between PFL and Prosper Depositor LLC have been eliminated in consolidation. PFL’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
F-54


Use of Estimates
The preparation of PFL’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, valuation of servicing rights, valuation of loan trailing fee liability, repurchase obligations, and contingent liabilities. PFL bases its estimates on historical experience from all Borrower Loans and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from estimates.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
A variable interest entity (VIE) is a legal entity that has either a total equity investment that is insufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. PFL’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in the entity, which change with fluctuations in the fair value of the entity’s net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. PFL consolidates a VIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. PFL assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an ongoing basis.
Transfers of Financial Assets
PFL accounts for transfers of financial assets as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from PFL, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and PFL has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold unconditional call options and has not written put options on the transferred assets. In assessing whether control has been surrendered, PFL considers whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the impact of all arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the transfer, even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer. PFL measures gain or loss on sale of financial assets as the net proceeds received on the sale less the carrying amount of the loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and recourse obligations.
Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial instruments consist principally of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Servicing Assets, Loan Trailing Fee Liability, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Payable to Investors and Notes. The estimated fair values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, and Payable to Investors approximate their carrying values because of their short term nature.
The fair value hierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable:
Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs.
When developing fair value measurements, PFL maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments PFL must utilize unobservable inputs in determining fair value due to the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. In instances where there is limited or no observable market data, fair value measurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Servicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, PFL believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Servicing Assets should be considered level 3 financial instruments. PFL primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate their fair value and key assumptions used in valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and
F-55


discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to investors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, the fair value of a series of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments. As a result, the valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing in payments. Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations. The effective interest rate associated with a group of Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee.
Refer to Note 7 for additional fair value disclosures.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificates of deposit accounts for loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or PFL have on the marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes
With respect to the Note Channel, PFL purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues notes, and holds the Borrower Loans as a receivable until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of notes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans. Borrower loans funded and notes issued through the Note Channel are carried on PFL’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. 
PFL places Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, PFL stops accruing interest and reverses all accrued but unpaid interest as of such date. Additionally, PFL charges-off Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value of loans 120 days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from debt sales in subsequent periods.
Management has elected the fair value option for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Notes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans are largely offset by the changes in fair value of Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent design of the Notes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are included in “Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
PFL primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes. The key assumptions used in valuation include default and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.  
Servicing Assets
PFL records Servicing Assets at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when PFL sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of Servicing Assets is recognized in revenue as Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing rate, is recorded in Servicing Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
PFL uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of Servicing Assets which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that PFL earns on the Borrower Loans, estimated market servicing fees to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and the current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.  
F-56


Software and Website Development
Software and website development represents the software and website development costs that PMI transferred to PFL. PFL does not develop any of its own software or its website. Software and website development are included in Property and Equipment, Net and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives which is generally one to five years. PFL evaluates its software assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software and website development assets.
Payable to Investors
Payable to Investors primarily represents the Company's obligation to investors related to cash held in an account for the benefit of investors and payments-in-process received from borrowers.
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
On July 1, 2016, PMI signed a series of agreements with WebBank which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the “Loan Trailing Fee”) paid to WebBank in connection with the performance of each loan sold to PMI. These agreements were effective as of August 1, 2016. The Loan Trailing Fee is dependent on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers of the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by PMI, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interest in the performance of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by PMI to WebBank over the term of the respective loans and is a function of the principal and interest payments made by borrowers of such loans. In the event that principal and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, PMI is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to PMI is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination of such loan within Other Liabilities and recorded as a reduction of “Transaction Fees, net”. Any changes in the fair value of this liability are recorded in “Servicing Fees, Net” on the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue primarily results from fees, net interest earned and gains on the sale of Borrower Loans. Fees consist of related party administrative fees and Servicing Fees paid by investors. The Company also has other smaller sources of revenue reported as Other Revenues including fees charged in relation to securitizations by outside investors.
Administration Agreement License Fees
PFL primarily generates revenues through license fees it earns through an Administration Agreement with PMI. The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by PFL to PMI that entitles PMI to use the platform for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and Note servicing and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding. The license fees are based on the number of listings that are posted to the platform.
Service Fees
Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from PFL through the Whole Loan Channel typically pay PFL a servicing fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates PFL for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. PFL records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received.
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans
PFL recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. PFL measures gain or loss on sale of Borrower Loans as the net proceeds received on the sale less the fair value of the Borrower Loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and repurchase obligations.
F-57


Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes
PFL recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and interest expense on the corresponding Notes using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent PFL believes it to be collectable.
Administration Fee Expense - Related Party
Pursuant to the Administration Agreement between PFL and PMI, PMI manages the marketplace on behalf of PFL. Accordingly each month, PFL is required to pay PMI an administration fee that is based on PMI’s (a) finance and legal personnel costs, (b) number of Borrower Loans originated through the Marketplace, (c) Servicing Fees collected by or on behalf of PFL, and (d) nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of PFL.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Adopted in the years ending December 31, 2018Current Period
No accounting standards were adopted in the current period for PFL.
Accounting Standards Issued, to be Adopted in Future Periods
No issued and 2017, respectively.  pending accounting standards were identified that are expected to have an impact on PFL.
NOTE 3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and Equipment consist of the following as of the dates presented (in thousands):
 December 31,
 20212020
Internal-use software and web site development costs$31,979 $26,953 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization(24,072)(20,025)
Total Property and Equipment, Net$7,907 $6,928 

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 was $4.9 million, $4.1 million and $4.4 million, respectively. Internal-use software and web site development additions of $5.9 million, $3.5 million and $5.5 million were purchased from PMI in the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.  
11. Subsequent Events
NOTE 4. BORROWER LOANS AND NOTES, AT FAIR VALUE
The fair value of Borrower Loans and Notes issued through the Note Channel is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics. The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the payments, if any, received on the corresponding borrower loan, net of the servicing fee. As such, the fair value of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently disbursed to the note holders. The effective interest rate associated with a series of notes will be less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding borrower loan due to the servicing fee.
The aggregate principal balances outstanding and fair values of Borrower Loans and Notes as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, are presented in the following table (in thousands):
Borrower LoansNotes
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Aggregate principal balance outstanding$265,232 $215,373 $267,415 $217,110 
Fair value adjustments2,394 (5,703)(1,430)(8,731)
Fair value$267,626 $209,670 $265,985 $208,379 

F-58


At December 31, 2021, Borrower Loans had original maturities of either 36 or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and had various original maturity dates through December 2026. At December 31, 2020, Borrower Loans had original maturities of either 36 or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and had various original maturity dates through December 2025. Since COVID-19 relief was first offered in March 2020 and through December 31, 2021, approximately 9.1% of our current outstanding loan balances on a cumulative basis have enrolled in at least one of these COVID-19 relief programs. Approximately 1.2% of our outstanding loan balances are actively enrolled in at least one relief program as of December 31, 2021.
As of December 31, 2021, Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $0.9 million and a fair value of $0.1 million. As of December 31, 2020, Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $1.4 million and a fair value of $0.1 million. PFL places loans on non-accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, Borrower Loans in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
NOTE 5. SERVICING ASSETS
PFL accounts for Servicing Assets at their estimated fair values with changes in fair values recorded in Servicing Fees, Net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The initial asset is recognized when PFL sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers through the Whole Loan Channel and the servicing rights are retained. The total recognized gains and losses on the sale of such Borrower Loans were a $8.5 million gain, a $6.4 million gain and a $5.1 million loss for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
At December 31, 2021, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which PFL retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $2.5 billion, original terms of either 36 or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and various original maturity dates through December 2026. At December 31, 2020, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which PFL retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $2.4 billion, original terms of either 36 or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and various original maturity dates through December 2025.
Contractually-specified servicing fees and ancillary fees totaled $29.2 million, $34.8 million and $43.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively, and are included in Servicing Fees, Net on the Statement of Operations.
Fair Value Valuation Method
PFL uses a discounted cash flow valuation methodology generally consisting of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the table within Note 7 are those that PFL considers significant to the estimated fair values of the Level 3 Servicing Assets. The following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.  
Market Servicing Rate
PFL estimates adequate market servicing rates that would fairly compensate a substitute servicer should one be required, which includes the profit that would be demanded in the marketplace. This rate is stated as a fixed percentage of outstanding principal balance on a per annum basis. With the assistance of a valuation specialist, PFL estimates these market servicing rates based on observable market rates for other loan types in the industry and bids from sub-servicing providers, adjusted for the unique loan attributes that are present in the specific loans that PFL sells and services and information from backup service providers.
Discount Rate
The discount rate is a rate of return used to discount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, which represents the fair value of the loan servicing rights. Management used a range of discount rates for the Servicing Assets based on comparable observed valuations of similar assets and publicly available disclosures related to servicing valuations, with comparability adjustments made to account for differences with PFL’s Servicing Assets.
Default Rate
The default rate presented in Note 7 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e., risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional default rate curves for each credit grade or borrower loan
F-59


category. Each point on a particular borrower loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to default per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. The assumption regarding defaults directly reduces servicing revenues because the amount of servicing revenues received is based on the amount collected each period.
Prepayment Rate
The prepayment rate presented in Note 7 is an annualized, average estimate considering all borrower loan categories (i.e., risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional prepayment rate curves for each credit grade or borrower loan category. Each point on a particular borrower loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to prepay per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. Prepayments reduce servicing revenues as they shorten the period over which PFL expects to collect fees on the Borrower Loans, which is used to project future servicing revenues.
NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES
PFL incurred no income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. PFL is a U.S. disregarded entity and its income and loss are included in the income tax reporting of its parent, PMI. Since PMI is in a taxable loss position, is not currently subject to income taxes, and has fully reserved against its deferred tax asset, the net effective tax rate for PFL is 0%.
NOTE 7. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
PFL has elected to record certain financial instruments at fair value on the balance sheet. PFL classifies Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes as financial instruments and assesses their fair value on a quarterly basis for financial statement presentation purposes. Gains and losses on these financial instruments are shown separately on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. As demonstrated in the following table, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and because the principal balances of the Borrower Loans approximated the principal balances of the Notes.
For a description of the fair value hierarchy and PFL’s fair value methodologies, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. PFL did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of Level 3 during the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The fair value of the Borrower Loans and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.
F-60


The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands):
December 31, 2021
Level 1
Inputs
Level 2
Inputs
Level 3
Inputs
Total
Assets:
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value$— $— $267,626 $267,626 
Servicing Assets— — 9,796 9,796 
Total Assets$— $— $277,422 $277,422 
Liabilities:    
Notes, at Fair Value$— $— $265,985 $265,985 
Loan Trailing Fee Liability*— — 2,161 2,161 
Total Liabilities$— $— $268,146 $268,146 
December 31, 2020
Level 1
Inputs
Level 2
Inputs
Level 3
Inputs
Total
Assets:
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value$— $— $209,670 $209,670 
Servicing Assets— — 11,088 11,088 
Total Assets$— $— $220,758 $220,758 
Liabilities:    
Notes, at Fair Value$— $— $208,379 $208,379 
Loan Trailing Fee Liability*— — 2,233 2,233 
Total Liabilities$— $— $210,612 $210,612 
*Included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As PFL’s Borrower Loans, Notes, Servicing Assets and loan trailing fee liability do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, PFL uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.
F-61


Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for PFL’s Level 3 fair value measurements at the dates presented:
 Range
Borrower Loans and Notes:December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Discount rate4.3 %— 13.9 %5.3 %— 16.1 %
Default rate2.0 %— 13.5 %2.6 %— 16.2 %
 Range
Servicing Assets:December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Discount rate15.0 %— 25.0 %15.0 %25.0 %
Default rate1.5 %— 14.1 %1.9 %17.7 %
Prepayment rate10.2 %— 32.3 %12.4 %28.9 %
Market servicing rate (1) (2)
0.648 %— 0.842 %0.625 %0.818 %
(1) Servicing assets associated with loans enrolled in a relief program offered by the Company in response to the COVID-19 pandemic as of December 31, 2021 were measured using a market servicing rate assumption of 84.2 basis points. This rate was estimated using a multiplier consistent with observable market rates for other loan types, applied to the base market servicing rate assumption of 64.8 basis points.
(2) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 6 basis points and 7 basis points, respectively, for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 70.8 basis points to 90.2 basis points and 69.5 basis points to 88.8 basis points, respectively.
Range
Loan Trailing Fee Liability:December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Discount rate15.0 %— 25.0 %15.0 %— 25.0 %
Default rate1.5 %— 14.1 %1.9 %— 17.7 %
Prepayment rate10.2 %— 32.3 %12.4 %— 28.9 %
Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Assets and Liabilities on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents additional information about Level 3 Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans, and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands): 
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
AssetsLiabilities
Borrower
Loans
Loans Held
for Sale
NotesTotal
Fair value at January 1, 2020$245,137 $— $(244,171)$966 
Originations133,644 1,338,082 (133,228)1,338,498 
Principal repayments(147,361)— 149,409 2,048 
Borrower Loans sold to third parties(2,547)(1,338,082)— (1,340,629)
Other changes— (53)(46)
Change in fair value(19,210)— 19,664 454 
Fair value at December 31, 2020$209,670 $— $(208,379)$1,291 
Originations232,000 1,712,705 (231,933)1,712,772 
Principal repayments(171,286)— 172,250 964 
Borrower Loans sold to third parties(1,422)(1,712,705)— (1,714,127)
Other changes(195)— 166 (29)
Change in fair value(1,141)— 1,911 770 
Fair value at December 31, 2021$267,626 $— $(265,985)$1,641 

F-62


The following table presents additional information about Level 3 Servicing Assets recorded at fair value (in thousands): 
Servicing Assets
Fair value at January 1, 2020$14,888 
Additions7,203 
Change in fair value(11,003)
Fair value at December 31, 2020$11,088 
Additions9,020 
Change in fair value(10,312)
Fair value at December 31, 2021$9,796 
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee Liability represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and default rates using a discounted cash flow model. The assumptions used are the same as those used for the valuation of Servicing Assets, as described below.
The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
Fair Value at January 1, 2020$2,997 
Issuances1,349 
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(2,421)
Change in fair value308 
Fair Value at December 31, 2020$2,233 
Issuances1,775 
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee(2,100)
Change in fair value253 
Fair Value at December 31, 2021$2,161 












F-63


Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity
Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Borrower Loans and Notes. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2021 and 2020 for Borrower Loans are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):
Borrower Loans:December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
Fair value, using the following assumptions:$267,626 $209,670 
     Weighted-average discount rate5.76 %8.93 %
     Weighted-average default rate10.70 %12.26 %
Fair value resulting from:  
100 basis point increase in discount rate$265,104  $207,810 
200 basis point increase in discount rate$262,499  $205,994 
Fair value resulting from:  
100 basis point decrease in discount rate$270,520  $211,575 
200 basis point decrease in discount rate$273,337  $213,527 
Fair value resulting from:  
100 basis point increase in default rate$265,435  $207,594 
200 basis point increase in default rate$263,107  $205,528 
Fair value resulting from:  
100 basis point decrease in default rate$270,133  $211,755 
200 basis point decrease in default rate$272,505  $213,851 

Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Notes. The sensitivity of the fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2021 and 2020 for Notes funded through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):
Notes:December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
Fair value, using the following assumptions:$265,985 $208,379 
     Weighted-average discount rate5.76 %8.93 %
     Weighted-average default rate10.70 %12.26 %
Fair value resulting from: 
100 basis point increase in discount rate$263,326  $206,528 
200 basis point increase in discount rate$260,735  $204,720 
Fair value resulting from: 
100 basis point decrease in discount rate$268,714  $210,274 
200 basis point decrease in discount rate$271,516  $212,217 
Fair value resulting from: 
100 basis point increase in default rate$263,644  $206,304 
200 basis point increase in default rate$261,318  $204,238 
Fair value resulting from: 
100 basis point decrease in default rate$268,340  $210,463 
200 basis point decrease in default rate$270,711  $212,558 
Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Servicing Assets. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2021 and 2020 for Servicing Assets are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):
F-64


Servicing Assets:December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Fair value, using the following assumptions:$9,796 $11,088 
     Weighted-average market servicing rate0.650 %0.631 %
     Weighted-average prepayment rate20.82 %19.84 %
     Weighted-average default rate12.24 %12.78 %
Fair value resulting from: 
Market servicing rate increase of 0.025%$9,171 $10,424 
Market servicing rate decrease of 0.025%$10,421 $11,752 
Fair value resulting from: 
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate$9,580 $10,874 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate$10,015 $11,304 
Fair value resulting from: 
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate$9,667 $10,936 
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate$9,926 $11,239 
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects.
NOTE 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of its operations, PFL becomes involved in various legal actions. PFL maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. The Company does not believe it is probable that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any such matters will have a material effect on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Operating Commitments
PFL has entered into an agreement with WebBank, Agreement
under which all Borrower Loans originated through the marketplace are made under WebBank's bank charter. On February 1, 2019, ProsperJune 25, 2021, PMI, along with PFL, and WebBank an FDIC-insured, Utah-chartered industrial bank (“WebBank”), entered into: (i) a ThirdFifth Amendment (the “Sale Agreement Amendment”) to the Asset Sale Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between Prosper FundingPFL and WebBank (the “Sale Agreement”); (ii) a ThirdSixth Amendment (the “Marketing Agreement Amendment”) to the Marketing Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (the “Marketing Agreement”); and (iii) a FirstThird Amendment (the “Purchase Agreement Amendment”) to the Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (the “Purchase Agreement” and, collectively with the Sale Agreement and the Marketing Agreement, the “Origination and Sale Agreements”).
The Sale Agreement Amendment, the Marketing Agreement Amendment, and the Purchase Agreement Amendment, collectively, are hereinafter referred to as the “Amendments”.
The Amendments extendamong other things, extends the term of the Sale Agreement Marketing Agreement and Purchase Agreements to February 1, 2022.2025 and amends certain collateral requirements under the Sale Agreement. The Marketing Agreement Amendment, among other things, extends the term of the Marketing Agreement to February 1, 2025 and sets forth the amended terms and conditions of certain fees owed by the Registrants to WebBank under the Marketing Agreement. The Purchase Agreement Amendment also amends certain collateral requirements of PMIProsper under the Purchase Agreement.
Pursuant to the Marketing Agreement Amendment, the marketing fee that PFL receives in connection with the origination of each loan is partially reduced by an amount (the “Designated Amount”) calculated as a percentage of the principal amount of such loan based on the aggregate principal amount of loans originated for the applicable month. To the extent the aggregate Designated Amount for all loans originated during any month is less than $143.5 thousand through February 1, 2022, and $100,000 thereafter through February 1, 2025, PFL is required to pay WebBank an amount equal to such deficiency. Accordingly, the minimum fee is $1.2 million for each year from 2022 through 2024, and $0.1 million in 2025.
F-69F-65


Additionally, under the agreement with WebBank, PFL is required to maintain minimum net liquidity of $15 million at all times during the term of the agreement. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. Violation of this covenant can result in termination of the contract with WebBank. As of December 31, 2021 the Company was in compliance with the covenant.
Loan Purchase Commitments
Under the terms of PFL's agreement with WebBank, PFL is committed to purchase $13.8 million of Borrower Loans that WebBank originated during the last two business days of the year ended December 31, 2021. PFL will purchase these Borrower Loans within the first two business days of the year ending December 31, 2022.
Repurchase Obligation
Under the terms of the loan purchase agreements between PFL and investors that participate in the Whole Loan Channel, PFL may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Borrower Loan from an investor. Generally, these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding protocols or a violation of the applicable federal, state or local lending laws. PFL recognizes a liability at fair value for the repurchase obligation when the Borrower Loans are sold. The fair value of the repurchase obligation is estimated based on historical experience. Repurchased Borrower Loans associated with violations of federal, state or local lending laws or verifiable identity theft are written off at the time of repurchase. The maximum potential amount of future payments associated under the repurchase obligation is the outstanding balances of the Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan channel, which at December 31, 2021 was $2.5 billion. PFL had accrued $0.3 million and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 respectively in regard to this obligation.
Regulatory Contingencies
PFL accrues for contingencies when a loss from such contingencies is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss is probable and if it is possible to quantify the amount of the estimated loss, PFL reviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on at least a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If PFL determines that an unfavorable outcome is not probable or that the amount of a loss cannot be reasonably estimated, PFL does not accrue for a potential litigation loss. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and PFL can estimate a range of outcomes, PFL records the amount management considers to be the best estimate within the range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if management cannot quantify the amount of the estimated loss, then PFL records the low end of the range of those potential losses.
SEC Inquiry
In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors. PMI was advised by the SEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. On April 19, 2019, the SEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million was paid in full in April 2019.
West Virginia Matter
In January 2018, the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and practices of PMI and PFL that the Attorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to which PMI responded with such information as was requested by the Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, PMI received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that, without in any way admitting that any of its prior practices were in violation of the Consumer Act, PMI agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. PMI is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.
We cannot predict the outcome of the matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been made.
No loans have been originated through the PFL platform to West Virginians since June 2016.
F-66


NOTE 9. RELATED PARTIES
Since inception, PFL has engaged in various transactions with its directors, executive officers, PMI, and immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and PMI. PFL believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to PFL than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
PFL’s executive officers and directors who are not executive officers participate in its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes. The aggregate amount of the Notes purchased and the income earned by parties deemed to be related parties of PFL for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are summarized below (in thousands):
Aggregate Amount of Notes Purchased for the Year Ended December 31,Interest Earned on Notes for the Year Ended December 31,
 2021202020212020
Executive officers and management$35 $28 $$
Directors (excluding executive officers and management)— — — — 
Total$35 $28 $$

The balance of Notes held by officers and directors who are not executive officers are as follows (in thousands):
Notes Balance as of
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Executive officers and management$41 $41 
Directors (excluding executive officers and management)— — 
Total$41 $41 

NOTE 10. SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS
PFL is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, asset managers, and investment funds to provide the funds to allow WebBank to originate Borrower Loans that the third party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2021, one individual party purchased 26.7% of such loans, and PMI’s Warehouse VIEs purchased 12.6% of such loans. For the year ended December 31, 2020, two individual parties purchased 21.4% and 14.3% of such loans, respectively, and PMI’s Warehouse VIEs purchased 18.2% of such loans. These purchases reflect that a significant portion of PFL’s business is dependent on funding through the Whole Loan Channel, through which 88% and 91% of Borrower Loans were originated in the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. 
F-67


EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
Description
Asset Transfer Agreement, dated January 22, 2013, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 23, 2015 by and among Prosper Marketplace, Inc., American HealthCare Lending, LLC (“AHL”), Prosper Healthcare Lending, LLC and Shaun Sorensen, solely in his capacity as agent for AHL’s members and option holders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of PMI’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 27, 2015)
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 23, 2015, by and among Prosper Marketplace, Inc., BillGuard, Inc., Beach Merger Sub, Inc. and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, solely in its capacity as the Stockholders’ Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of PMI’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 15, 2015)
Asset Transfer Agreement, dated August 17, 2021, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (1)(2)
Fifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Prosper Funding LLC, dated October 21, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-179941), filed on October 23, 2013 by PFL and PMI)
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PMI, as further amended on October 15, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 14, 2018)
Certificate of Formation of Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed April 23, 2012 by PFL)
Bylaws of Prosper Marketplace, Inc., dated March 22, 2005, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated February 15, 2016 and Amendment No. 2 dated May 19, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23.4 of PMI’s Registration Statementand PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form S-110-Q (File No. 333-147019)333-225797), filed October 30, 2007)August 14, 2020)
Form of PFL Borrower Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit A in Exhibit 4.5)

Form of PMI Borrower Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit A in Exhibit 4.4)

Supplemental Indenture, dated January 22, 2013, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc., Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
Indenture, dated June 15, 2009, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-147019), filed on June 26, 2009)
Amended and Restated Indenture, dated January 22, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 10, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 14, 2013)
Form of PFL Borrower Registration Agreement (2)
Form of PFL Investor Registration Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 20, 2017)

2020)
Asset Sale Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017) (1)

First Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated October 7, 2016, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K,8-K/A, filed on March 15,April 22, 2019) (1)
Second Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated March 27, 2017, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K,8-K/A, filed on March 15,April 22, 2019) (1)
93


Exhibit
Number
Description
Third Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated February 1, 2019, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K,8-K/A, filed on February 7,April 24, 2019)
93


Exhibit
Number
Description
Fourth Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated November 9, 2020, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2020)
Fifth Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated June 25, 2021, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on July 1, 2021) (1)
Marketing Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017) (1)

First Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated October 7, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K,8-K/A, filed on March 15,April 22, 2019) (1)
Marketing Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017) (1)

Second Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated November 17, 2017, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 15, 2019) (1) 
Marketing Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017)April 22, 2019) (1)

Third Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated February 1, 2019, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K,8-K/A, filed on February 7,April 24, 2019) (1)
Fourth Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated September 21, 2020, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2020) (1)
Fifth Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated November 9, 2020, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2020) (1)
Sixth Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated June 25, 2021, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on July 1, 2021) (1)
Administration Agreement, effective as of February 1, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
Amendment No. 1 to Administration Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2014, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2014)
Amendment No. 2 to Administration Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2015, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 6, 2015)
Amendment No. 3 to Administration Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016 and made effective as of July 1, 2016, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 20, 2017)

Amendment No. 4 to Administration Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2018, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 26, 2018)
Amendment No. 5 to Administration Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2018 and made effective as of October 1, 2018, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (2)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 29, 2019)
Amendment No. 6 to Administration Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2021, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 13, 2021)
94


Exhibit
Number
Description
Services and Indemnity Agreement, dated March 1, 2012, among Global Securitization Services, LLC, Kevin Burns, Bernard Angelo, Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to PFL and PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Nos. 333-179941 and 333-179941-01), filed on November 21, 2012) (3)
Second Amended and Restated Loan Sale Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, among WebBank, Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013) (1)
Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan Sale Agreement, dated October 27, 2015, between PMI, PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 9, 2015)
Second Amended and Restated Loan Account Program Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013) (1)
Stand By Loan Purchase Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013) (1)
Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 8, 2016) (1)
First Amendment to Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated February 1, 2019, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K,8-K/A, filed on February 7,April 24, 2019) (1)
Second Amendment to Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated November 9, 2020, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2020) (1)
Third Amendment to Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated June 25, 2021, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on July 1, 2021) (1)
Director Indemnification Agreement, dated January 15, 2013, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Patrick (Pat) Grady (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 31, 2014) (3)
94


Exhibit
Number
Description
Form of Indemnification Agreement for PMI’s directors (other than Patrick Grady), officers and key employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 18, 2016) (3)
Back-Up Servicing Agreement (Note Channel), dated as of February 24, 2017, among Prosper Funding LLC, Prosper Marketplace, Inc., and Vervent, Inc. (f/k/a First Associates Loan Servicing, LLCLLC) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 15, 2017) (1)

Amended and Restated Services and Indemnity Agreement, dated May 30, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC, Prosper Marketplace, Inc., Global Securitization Services, LLC, Bernard J. Angelo and David V. DeAngelis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 5, 2013) (3)
Amended and Restated Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 29, 2014) (3)
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 12, 2015) (3)
Amendment No. 1 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 13, 2016) (3)
Amendment No. 2 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on August 15, 2016) (3)
Amendment No. 3 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 26, 2018) (3)
95


Exhibit
Number
Description
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 18, 2016) (3)
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 18, 2016) (3)
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. Eligible Employee Retention Plan, adopted as of November 6, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2020) (3)
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan, effective November 5, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2020) (3)
First Amendment to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan, effective May 11, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 13, 2021) (3)
Form of Prosper Marketplace, Inc. Severance and Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2020) (3)
Warrant Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2017, among PMI, PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP, and, for certain limited purposes, New Residential Investment Corp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 15, 2017) (1)

Subsidiaries of Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (2)
Subsidiaries of Prosper Funding LLC (2)
Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm (2)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of PMI pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of PMI pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of PFL pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of PFL pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of PMI pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to PMI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20182020 (2)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20182020 (2)

(1) Certain portions of this exhibit have been, as applicable, (i) omitted and filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 406 of the Securities Act.Act or (ii) marked by brackets and omitted because the information is (a) not material and (b) would be competitively harmful if disclosed.
(2) Filed herewith.
(3) Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.  
96
95


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 28th day of March 2019.2022.
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
By:/s/ David Kimball
David Kimball
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer);
DirectorChairman of the Board
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Usama Ashraf and Julie Hwang,Edward R. Buell III, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameTitleDate
/s/ David KimballChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer); Director
Chairman of the Board
March 28, 20192022
David Kimball  
/s/ Usama AshrafPresident and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)March 28, 20192022
Usama Ashraf  
*DirectorMarch 28, 20192022
Claire A. Huang
*DirectorMarch 28, 2019
Rajeev V. Date  
*DirectorMarch 28, 20192022
Patrick W. GradyThomas R. Kearney  
*DirectorMarch 28, 20192022
David R. GolobPeter J. deSilva
*DirectorMarch 28, 2019
Nigel W. Morris
*DirectorMarch 28, 2019
Mason D. Haupt  

*By: /s/ Julie HwangEdward R. Buell IIIMarch 28, 2019
Julie Hwang

2022
Attorney-in-Fact Edward R. Buell III
Attorney-in-Fact
9697


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 28th day of March 2019.2022.
PROSPER FUNDING LLC
By:/s/ David Kimball
David Kimball
Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer); Director
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Usama Ashraf and Julie Hwang,Edward R. Buell III, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameTitle
/s/ David KimballChief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer); DirectorMarch 28, 20192022
David Kimball 
/s/ Usama AshrafPresident, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer); DirectorMarch 28, 20192022
Usama Ashraf

 
/s/ Bernard J. AngeloDirectorMarch 28, 20192022
Bernard J. Angelo 
/s/ David V. DeAngelisDirectorMarch 28, 20192022
David V. DeAngelis

9798