UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K
(Mark One)
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 20172020
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                                    to                                     .
Commission file number: 001-35120

CVR Partners, LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
Delawarecvi-20201231_g1.jpg
56-2677689
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
56-2677689
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)
2277 Plaza Drive, Suite 500
Sugar Land, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
77479
(Zip Code)

2277 Plaza Drive, Suite 500, Sugar Land, Texas 77479
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(281) 207-3200
(Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common units representing limited partner interestsUANNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes o        No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ        No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 orof Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes þ        No o.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated” “accelerated filer," "smaller” “smaller reporting company"company” and "emerging“emerging growth company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filero
Accelerated filerþ
Non-accelerated filero
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth companyo
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes o        No þ
TheAt June 30, 2020, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equityunits held by non-affiliates of the registrant computedwas approximately $62.3 million based upon the closing price of its common units on the New York Stock Exchange closing price on June 30, 2017 (the last business dayComposite tape. As of February 19, 2021, there were 10,692,332 of the registrant's second fiscal quarter) was $258,354,879. Common units held by each executive officer and director and by each entity or person that, to the registrant's knowledge, owned 10% or more of the registrant's outstandingregistrant’s common units as of June 30, 2017 have been excluded from this number in that these persons may be deemed affiliates of the registrant. This determination of possible affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.outstanding.
ClassOutstanding at February 20, 2018
Common unit representing limited partner interests113,282,973 units

TABLE OF CONTENTS


TABLE OF CONTENTS
CVR Partners, LP
Annual Report on Form 10-K


Page
cvi-20201231_g1.jpg


December 31, 2020 | 1


Table of Contents
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED TERMS
The following are definitions of certain terms used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172020 (this "Report"“Report”).
Ammonia — Ammonia is a direct application fertilizer and is primarily used as a building block for other nitrogen products for industrial applications and finished fertilizer products.

Capacity — Capacity is defined as the throughput a process unit is capable of sustaining, either on a calendar or operating day basis. The throughput may be expressed in terms of maximum sustainable, nameplate or economic capacity. The maximum sustainable or nameplate capacities may not be the most economical. The economic capacity is the throughput that generally provides the greatest economic benefit based on considerations such as feedstock costs, product values, regulatory compliance costs and downstream unit constraints.

Catalyst — A substance that alters, accelerates, or instigates chemical changes, but is neither produced, consumed nor altered in the process.

Corn belt — The primary corn producing region of the United States, which includes Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio and Wisconsin.

Ethanol — A clear, colorless, flammable oxygenated hydrocarbon. Ethanol is typically produced chemically from ethylene, or biologically from fermentation of various sugars from carbohydrates found in agricultural crops and cellulosic residues from crops or wood. It is used in the United States as a gasoline octane enhancer and oxygenate.

MMBtu — One million British thermal units, or Btu: a measure of energy. One Btu of heat is required to raise the temperature of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit.

MSCF — One thousand standard cubic feet, a customary gas measurement.

Petroleum coke (pet coke) — A coal-like substance that is produced during the oil refining process.

Product pricing at gate — Product pricing at gate represents net sales less freight revenue divided by product sales volume in tons. Product pricing at gate is also referred to as netback.

Southern Plains — Primarily includes Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico.

Spot market — A market in which commodities are bought and sold for cash and delivered immediately.

Turnaround — A periodically performed standard procedure to inspect, refurbish, repair, and maintain the plant assets. This process involves the shutdown and inspection of major processing units and occurs every two to three years. A turnaround will typically extend the operating life of a facility and return performance desired operating levels.

UAN — An aqueous solution of urea and ammonium nitrate used as a fertilizer.

Utilization — Measurement of the annual production of UAN and Ammonia expressed as a percentage of the plants’ nameplate production capacity.
2023 Notes$645.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.250% Senior Secured Notes due 2023, which were issued through CVR Partners and CVR Nitrogen Finance Corporation.
ABL Credit FacilityThe Partnership's senior secured asset based revolving credit facility with a group of lenders and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent.
ammoniaAmmonia is a direct application fertilizer and is primarily used as a building block for other nitrogen products for industrial applications and finished fertilizer products.
capacityCapacity is defined as the throughput a process unit is capable of sustaining, either on a calendar or stream day basis. The throughput may be expressed in terms of maximum sustainable, nameplate or economic capacity. The maximum sustainable or nameplate capacities may not be the most economical. The economic capacity is the throughput that generally provides the greatest economic benefit based on considerations such as feedstock costs, product values and downstream unit constraints.
Coffeyville FacilityCVR Partners' nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing facility located in Coffeyville, Kansas.
common unitsCommon units representing limited partner interests of CVR Partners.
corn beltThe primary corn producing region of the United States, which includes Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio and Wisconsin.
CRLLCCoffeyville Resources, LLC, the subsidiary of CVR Energy which indirectly owns our general partner and 38,920,000 common units.
CVR EnergyCVR Energy, Inc., a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "CVI," which indirectly owns our general partner and the common units owned by CRLLC.
CVR NitrogenCVR Nitrogen, LP (formerly known as East Dubuque Nitrogen Partners, L.P. and also formerly known as Rentech Nitrogen Partners L.P.).
CVR PartnersCVR Partners, LP.
CVR RefiningCVR Refining, LP, a publicly traded limited partnership listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol "CVRR," which currently owns and operates a complex full coking medium-sour crude oil refinery with a rated capacity of 115,000 barrels per calendar day (bpcd) in Coffeyville, Kansas, a complex crude oil refinery with a rated capacity of 70,000 bpcd in Wynnewood, Oklahoma and ancillary businesses.
East Dubuque FacilityCVR Partners' nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing facility located in East Dubuque, Illinois.
East Dubuque MergerThe transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, whereby the Partnership acquired CVR Nitrogen and CVR Nitrogen GP, LLC on April 1, 2016.
ethanolA clear, colorless, flammable oxygenated hydrocarbon. Ethanol is typically produced chemically from ethylene, or biologically from fermentation of various sugars from carbohydrates found in agricultural crops and cellulosic residues from crops or wood. It is used in the United States as a gasoline octane enhancer and oxygenate.
farm beltRefers to the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas and Wisconsin.
general partnerCVR GP, LLC, our general partner, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CRLLC.
MMBtuOne million British thermal units: a measure of energy. One Btu of heat is required to raise the temperature of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit.
MSCFOne thousand standard cubic feet, a customary gas measurement.
NYSEThe New York Stock Exchange.

December 31, 2020 | 2


Table of Contents
Important Information Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including, but not limited to, those under Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. These forward looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including without limitation, statements regarding future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, growth, capital projects, unit repurchases, impacts of legal proceedings, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward looking statements. The words “could,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential,” “project,” and similar terms and phrases are intended to identify forward looking statements.

Although we believe our assumptions concerning future events are reasonable, a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors could cause actual results and trends to differ materially from those projected or forward looking. Forward looking statements, as well as certain risks, contingencies, or uncertainties that may impact our forward looking statements, include, but are not limited to, the following:
our ability to generate distributable cash or make cash distributions on our common units;
the ability of our general partner to modify or revoke our distribution policy at any time;
the volatile nature of our business and the variable nature of our distributions;
the severity, magnitude, duration, and impact of the novel coronavirus 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic and of businesses’ and governments’ responses to such pandemic on our operations, personnel, commercial activity, and supply and demand across our and our customers’ and suppliers’ businesses;
changes in market conditions and market volatility arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, including fertilizer, natural gas, and other commodity prices and the impact of such changes on our operating results and financial position;
the cyclical and seasonal nature of our business;
the impact of weather on our business including our ability to produce, market, sell, transport or deliver fertilizer products profitably or at all;
the dependence of our operations on a few third-party suppliers, including providers of transportation services, and equipment;
our reliance on, or our ability to procure economically or at all, pet coke we purchase from CVR Energy, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, but excluding the Partnership and its subsidiaries, “CVR Energy”) and other third-party suppliers;
our reliance on the natural gas, electricity, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur processing, compressed dry air and other products that we purchase from third parties;
the supply, availability, and prices of essential raw materials;
our production levels, including the risk of a material decline in those levels, including our ability to upgrade ammonia to UAN;
accidents or other unscheduled shutdowns or interruptions affecting our facilities, machinery, or equipment, or those of our suppliers or customers;
potential operating hazards from accidents, fire, severe weather, tornadoes, floods or other natural disasters;
our ability to obtain, retain, or renew permits, licenses and authorizations to operate our business;
competition in the nitrogen fertilizer businesses including potential impacts of domestic and global supply and demand; and/or domestic or international duties, tariffs, or similar costs;
foreign wheat and coarse grain production, including increases thereto and farm planting acerage;
capital expenditures;
existing and future laws, rulings and regulations, including but not limited to those relating to the environment, climate change, and/or the transportation or production of hazardous chemicals like ammonia, including potential liabilities or capital requirements arising from such laws, rulings, or regulations;
alternative energy or fuel sources and impacts on corn prices (ethanol), and the end-use and application of fertilizers;
risks of terrorism, cybersecurity attacks, the security of chemical manufacturing facilities and other matters beyond our control;
our lack of asset diversification;
our dependence on significant customers and the creditworthiness and performance by counterparties;
our potential loss of transportation cost advantage over our competitors;
risks associated with third party operation of or control over important facilities necessary for operation of our nitrogen fertilizer facilities;
the volatile nature of ammonia, potential liability for accidents involving ammonia including damage or injury to persons, property, the environment or human health and increased costs related to the transport or production of ammonia;
our potential inability to successfully implement our business strategies, including the completion of significant capital programs or projects;
our reliance on CVR Energy’s senior management team and conflicts of interest they may face operating each of CVR Partners and CVR Energy;
control of our general partner by CVR Energy;
our ability to continue to license the technology used in our operations;
restrictions in our debt agreements;
netbackNetback represents net sales less freight revenue divided by product sales volume in tons. Netback is also referred to as product pricing at gate.
on-streamMeasurement of the reliability of the gasification, ammonia and UAN units, defined as the total number of hours operated by each unit divided by the total number of hours in the reporting period.
PartnershipCVR Partners, LP.
pet cokePetroleum coke – a coal-like substance that is produced during the oil refining process.
product pricing at gateProduct pricing at gate represents net sales less freight revenue divided by product sales volume in tons. Product pricing at gate is also referred to as netback.
southern plainsPrimarily includes Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico.
tonOne ton is equal to 2,000 pounds.
turnaroundA periodically required standard procedure to refurbish and maintain a facility that involves the shutdown and inspection of major processing units.
UANUAN is an aqueous solution of urea and ammonium nitrate used as a fertilizer.

December 31, 2020 | 3


Table of Contents
asset impairments and impacts thereof;
asset usefule life;
realizable inventory value;
the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our common units;
our ability to issue securities or obtain financing;
the possibility of changes in tax and other law, regulations and policies;
ability to qualify for 45Q tax credits;
changes in our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income or state tax purposes;
rulings, judgments or settlements in litigation, tax or other legal or regulatory matters;
instability and volatility in the capital and credit markets;
competition with CVR Energy and its affiliates;
transactions and/or conflicts with CVR Energy’s controlling shareholder;
the value of payouts under our equity and non-equity incentive plans; and
our ability to recover under our insurance policies for damages or losses in full or at all.

All forward looking statements contained in this Report only speak as of the date of this Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this Report, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except to the extent required by law.
December 31, 2020 | 4


Table of Contents
PART I

Part I should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis in Item 7 and our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto in Item 8.

Item 1.    Business

Overview

CVR Partners, LP ("CVR Partners,"(referred to as “CVR Partners” or the "Partnership," "we," "us," or "our"“Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed in 2011 by CVR Energy, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, but excluding the Partnership and its subsidiaries, “CVR Energy”) to own, operate and grow ourits nitrogen fertilizer business. We produce and distribute nitrogen fertilizer products, which are used by farmers to improve the yield and quality of their crops. Our principal products are UAN and ammonia. All of our products are sold on a wholesale basis. We produce ourThe Partnership produces nitrogen fertilizer products at two manufacturing facilities, which are located in Coffeyville, Kansas (the “Coffeyville Facility”) and East Dubuque, Illinois.Illinois (the “East Dubuque Facility”). Both facilities manufacture ammonia and are able to further upgrade to other nitrogen fertilizer products, principally urea ammonium nitrate (“UAN”). Nitrogen fertilizer is used by farmers to improve the yield and quality of their crops, primarily corn and wheat. The Partnership’s products are sold on a wholesale basis in the United States of America. As used in these financial statements, references to CVR Partners, the Partnership, “we”, “us”, and “our” may refer to consolidated subsidiaries of CVR Partners or one or both of the facilities, as the context may require.
Our
Organizational Structure and Related Ownership

The following chart illustrates the organizational structure of the Partnership as of December 31, 2020.
cvi-20201231_g2.jpg

December 31, 2020 | 5


Table of Contents
Facilities

Coffeyville Facility includes- We own and operate a 1,300 ton-per-day capacity ammonia unit, a 3,000 ton-per-day capacity UAN unit, andnitrogen fertilizer production facility in Coffeyville, Kansas that includes a gasifier complex having a capacity of 89 million standard cubic feet per day of hydrogen. Our gasifier ishydrogen, a dual-train facility, with each gasifier able to function independently of the other, thereby providing redundancy1,300 ton per day capacity ammonia unit and improving our reliability. Strategically located adjacent to CVR Refining’s refinery in Coffeyville, Kansas, oura 3,000 ton per day capacity UAN unit. The Coffeyville Facility is the only operationnitrogen fertilizer plant in North America that utilizes a petroleum coke, or pet coke gasification process to produce nitrogen fertilizer. DuringThe Coffeyville Facility’s largest raw material used in the past five years, over 70%production of theammonia is pet coke, consumed bywhich it purchases from CVR Energy and third parties. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Partnership purchased approximately $18.4 million, $20.0 million, and $13.2 million, respectively, of pet coke, which equaled an average cost per ton of $35.25, $37.47, and $28.41, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, we upgraded approximately 87%, 90%, and 93%, respectively, of our ammonia production into UAN, a product that typically generates greater profit per ton than ammonia, however, this did not hold true for 2020 due to market conditions. We upgrade substantially all of our ammonia production at the Coffeyville Facility was produced and supplied by CVR Refining’s Coffeyville, Kansas crude oil refinery. We upgrade the majority of the ammonia we produce at our Coffeyville Facility to higher margin UAN, which has historically commanded a premium price over ammonia. Approximately 88% of our Coffeyville Facility produced ammonia tons were upgraded into UAN in 2017.and expect to continue to do so when the economics are favorable.
Our
East Dubuque Facility - We own and operate a nitrogen fertilizer production facility in East Dubuque, Illinois that includes a 1,075 ton-per-dayton per day capacity ammonia unit and a 1,100 ton-per-dayton per day capacity UAN unit. The facility is located on a bluff above the Mississippi River, with access to the river for loading certain products. The East Dubuque Facility uses natural gas as its primary feedstock. The East Dubuque Facility has the flexibility to significantly vary its product mix. This enables usmix enabling it to upgrade oura portion of its ammonia production into varying amounts of UAN, nitric acid, and liquid and granulated urea, each season, depending on market demand, pricing, and storage availability. Product sales are heavily weighted toward salesThe East Dubuque Facility’s largest raw material cost used in the production of ammonia is natural gas, which it purchases from third parties. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and UAN. Approximately 44% of our2018, the East Dubuque Facility produced ammonia tons were upgradedincurred approximately $22.0 million, $21.5 million, and $22.5 million for feedstock natural gas, respectively, which equaled an average cost of $2.35, $3.08, and $3.15 per MMBtu, respectively.

Commodities

The nitrogen products we produce are globally traded commodities and are subject to otherprice competition. The customers for our products in 2017.
CVR Energy, which indirectly owns our general partnermake their purchasing decisions principally on the basis of delivered price and, approximately 34%to a lesser extent, on customer service and product quality. The selling prices of our outstanding common units, also indirectly ownsproducts fluctuate in response to global market conditions and changes in supply and demand.

Agriculture

The three primary forms of nitrogen fertilizer used in the general partnerUnited States of America are ammonia, urea, and UAN. Unlike ammonia and urea, UAN can be applied throughout the growing season and can be applied in tandem with pesticides and herbicides, providing farmers with flexibility and cost savings. As a result of these factors, UAN typically commands a premium price to urea and ammonia, on a nitrogen equivalent basis. However, during 2020, UAN commanded a discount price to urea and premium to ammonia, on a nitrogen equivalent basis.

Nutrients are depleted in soil over time and, therefore, must be replenished through fertilizer use. Nitrogen is the most quickly depleted nutrient and must be replenished every year, whereas phosphate and potassium can be retained in soil for up to three years. Plants require nitrogen in the largest amounts, and it accounts for approximately 66%59% of primary fertilizer consumption on a nutrient ton basis, per the International Fertilizer Industry Association (“IFIA”).

Demand

Global demand for fertilizers is driven primarily by grain demand and prices, which, in turn, are driven by population growth, farmland per capita, dietary changes in the developing world, and increased consumption of bio-fuels. According to the IFIA, from 1976 to 2018, global fertilizer demand grew 2% annually. Global fertilizer use, consisting of nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium, is projected to increase by 1% through 2023 to meet global food demand according to a study funded by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the outstanding common unitsUnited Nations. Currently, the developed world uses fertilizer more intensively than the developing world, but sustained economic growth in emerging markets is increasing food demand and fertilizer use. In addition, populations in developing countries are shifting to more protein-rich diets as their incomes increase, with such consumption requiring more grain for animal feed. As an example, China’s wheat and coarse grains production is estimated to have increased 35% between 2011 and 2021, but still failed to keep pace with increases in demand, prompting China to grow its wheat and coarse grain imports by more than 1,038% over the same period, according to the United States Department of CVR Refining at Agriculture (“USDA”).
December 31, 2017.2020 | 6
We generated net sales

Table of $330.8 millionContents

The United States is the world’s largest exporter of coarse grains, accounting for 32% of world exports and a net loss26% of $72.8 millionworld production for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. OurSeptember 30, 2020, according to the USDA. A substantial amount of nitrogen is consumed in production of these crops to increase yield. Based on Fertecon Limited’s (“Fertecon”) 2020 estimates, the United States is the world’s third largest consumer of nitrogen fertilizer and the world’s largest importer of nitrogen fertilizer. Fertecon is a reputable agency which provides market information and analysis on fertilizers and fertilizer raw materials for fertilizer and related industries, as well as international agencies. Fertecon estimates indicate that the United States represented 11% of total assets balanceglobal nitrogen fertilizer consumption for 2020, with China and India as the top consumers representing 22% and 17% of December 31, 2017 was $1,234.3 million.total global nitrogen fertilizer consumption, respectively.



North American nitrogen fertilizer producers predominantly use natural gas as their primary feedstock. Over the last five years, U.S. oil and natural gas reserves have increased significantly due to, among other factors, advances in extracting shale oil and gas, as well as relatively high oil and gas prices. More recently, global demand has slowed with production staying steady even as oil and gas prices have declined substantially over the past two years. This has led to significantly reduced natural gas and oil prices as compared to historical prices. As a result, North America has become a low-cost region for nitrogen fertilizer production.
Organizational Structure and Related Ownership
The following chart illustrates the organizational structure of the Partnership as of the date of this Report.

Raw Material Supply
Coffeyville Facility
Our Coffeyville Facility was built in 2000 and uses a gasification process to convert pet coke to high purity hydrogen for subsequent conversion to ammonia. Our Coffeyville Facility's pet coke gasification process results in a higher percentage of fixed costs than a natural gas-based fertilizer plant. - During the past five years, over 70%just under 60% of ourthe Coffeyville Facility’s pet coke requirements on average were supplied by CVR Refining'sEnergy’s adjacent crude oilCoffeyville, Kansas refinery pursuant to a renewable long-termmulti-year agreement. Historically, we haveour Coffeyville Facility has obtained the remainder of ourits pet coke requirements from third parties such as other Midwestern refineries orthrough third-party contracts typically priced at a discount to the spot market. In 2020, our supply of pet coke brokers at spot-prices. We are partyfrom the Coffeyville refinery declined to aapproximately 33%, generally attributable to increased processing of shale crude oil, which reduced the amount of pet coke supply agreement with HollyFrontier Corporation that ends in December 2018,produced by the refinery and increased the amount of third-party purchases made at spot prices. With increased reliance on third-party pet coke, we have historically renewed this agreement annually. If necessary, there are othercontracts with multiple third-party refineries to purchase approximately 275,000 tons of pet coke suppliers. We also purchased some ofat a fixed price for delivery at different dates through December 2021, which could be delivered primarily by truck, railcar or barge.

Additionally, our hydrogen from CVR Refining's adjacent crude oil refinery pursuant toCoffeyville Facility relies on a long-term agreement.
The pet coke gasification process is licensed from an affiliate of General Electric Company. The license grants us perpetual rights to use the pet coke gasification process on specified terms and conditions, and the license is fully paid.
Linde LLC ("Linde") owns, operates, and maintains thethird-party air separation plant at its location that provides contract volumes of oxygen, nitrogen, and compressed dry air to the Coffeyville Facility gasifiers. The reliability of the air separation plant can have a significant impact on our gasifiers.Coffeyville Facility operations. In 2020, to mitigate future impacts, we executed a new product supply agreement that provides for a consistent volume of oxygen that will be maintained within tanks provided by the on-site vendor. Should the oxygen volume fall below a specified level, the on-site vendor will provide excess oxygen through its own mechanism or through third party purchases.

East Dubuque Facility
The - Our East Dubuque Facility uses natural gas to produce nitrogen fertilizer. We areOur East Dubuque Facility is generally able to purchase natural gas at competitive prices due to the plant’sits connection to the Northern Natural Gas interstate pipeline system, which is within one mile of the facility, and the ANR Pipeline Companya third-party owned and operated pipeline. The pipelines are connected to Nicor Inc.’sa third-party distribution system at the Chicago Citygate receipt point and at the Hampshire interconnect from which natural gas is transported to the facility.
Changes in the levels of natural gas prices and market prices of nitrogen-based products can materially affect our financial position and results of operations. Natural gas prices in the United States have experienced significant fluctuations over the last decade, increasing substantially in 2008 and subsequently declining to the current lower levels. From time to time, we enter into forward contracts with fixed delivery prices to purchase portions of our natural gas requirements.East Dubuque Facility. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had commitments to purchase approximately 1.80.6 million MMBtus of natural gas supply for planned use in our East Dubuque Facility infor each of January and February 2018of 2021 at a weighted average rate per MMBtu of approximately $3.20,$2.60 and $2.52, respectively, exclusive of transportation cost.
Distribution, Sales
Marketing and MarketingDistribution
The primary geographic markets for our fertilizer products are Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, and Texas.
We primarily market the UAN products to agricultural customers and ammonia products to agricultural and industrial customers. UAN and ammonia, including freight, accounted for approximately 67%65% and 25%28%, respectively, of our total net sales for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

UAN and ammonia are primarily distributed by truck or by railcar. If delivered by truck, products are most commonly sold on a FOBfree-on-board (“FOB”) shipping point basis, and freight is normally arranged by the customer. We lease and ownoperate a fleet of railcars for use in product delivery, and, ifdelivery. If delivered by railcar, our products are most commonly sold on a FOB destination point basis, and we typically arrange the freight. Our

December 31, 2020 | 7


Table of Contents
The nitrogen fertilizer products leave our Coffeyville Facility either in railcars for destinations located primarilyprincipally on the Union Pacific Railroador Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroads or in trucks for direct shipment to customers. TheOur East Dubuque Facility primarily sells its product to customers located within 200 miles of the facility. In most instances, customers take delivery of nitrogen products at theour East Dubuque Facility and arrange and pay to transport them to their final destinations by truck. Additionally, our East Dubuque Facility has direct access to a barge dock on the Mississippi River, as well as a nearby rail spur serviced by the Canadian National Railway Company, both of which are used from time to time to sell and distribute its products.
We have
Customers

Retailers and distributors are the capacity to store approximately 160,000 tons ofmain customers for UAN and, 80,000 tons of ammonia. Our storage tanksmore broadly, the industrial and agricultural sectors are located primarily at our two production facilities. Inventories are often allowed to accumulate to allow customers to take delivery to meet the seasonal demand. While we do experience higher sales volumes due to seasonality during the fall and spring application periods, we sell our product to customers throughout the year.
We offer our agricultural products on a spot, forward or prepay basis. We often use forward salesprimary recipients of our fertilizer products to optimize our asset utilization, planning process and production scheduling. These sales are made by offering customers the opportunity to purchase product on a forward basis at prices and delivery dates that we propose. We use this program to varying degrees during the year and between years depending on our view of market conditions. Fixing the selling prices of our products months in advance of their ultimate delivery to customers typically causes our reported selling prices and margins to differ from spot market prices and margins available at the time of shipment. Cash received as a result of prepayments is recognized as deferred revenue on our Consolidated Balance Sheet upon receipt, and revenue and resultant net income and EBITDA are recorded as the product is delivered.

Customers
We sell UAN products to retailers and distributors. In addition, we sell ammonia to agricultural and industrial customers.products. Given the nature of our business, and consistent with industry practice, we do notsell our products on a wholesale basis under a contract or by purchase order. Contracts with customers generally contain fixed pricing and most have long-term minimum purchase contracts with mostterms of our agricultural customers.less than one year. Some of our industrial sales include long-term purchase contracts.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the2020, our top fivetwo customers in the aggregate represented 31%26% of our net sales. Our top customer on a consolidated basis accounted for approximately 11% of our net sales. While we do have high concentration of customers, we do not believe that the loss of any single customer would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions. Refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, Our business depends on significant customers, and the loss of significant customers may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions, of this Report for further discussion.

Competition
We have
Nitrogen fertilizer production is a global market with competitors in every region of the world. The industry is dominated by price considerations which are driven by raw material and transportation costs, currency fluctuations and trade barriers. Our business has experienced and expectexpects to continue to meetexperience significant levels of competition from currentdomestic and potential competitors,foreign nitrogen fertilizer producers, many of whom have significantly greater financial and other resources. Refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, Nitrogen fertilizer products are global commodities, and we face intense competition from other nitrogen fertilizer producers, of this Report for further discussion.
Competition in our industry is dominated by price considerations. However,In the United States during the spring and fall fertilizer application seasons,periods, farming activities intensify and delivery capacitygeographic proximity to these activities is also a significant competitive factor.advantage for domestic producers. We maintain a large fleet of leased and owned railcars and seasonally adjust inventory to enhancemanage our manufacturing and distribution operations.operations to best serve our customers during these critical periods.
Our
Subject to location and other considerations our major competitors generally include CF Industries Holdings, Inc., including its majority owned subsidiary Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P.; LSB Industries, Inc.; Koch Fertilizer Company, LLC; and Nutrien Ltd. (formerly known as Agrium, Inc. and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc.). Domestic competition is intense due to customers'customers’ sophisticated buying tendencies and competitor strategies that focus on cost and service. We also encounter competition from producers of fertilizer products manufactured in foreign countries.countries, including the threat of increased production capacity. In certain cases, foreign producers of fertilizer who export to the United States may be subsidized by their respective governments.

Seasonality

Because we primarily sell agricultural commodity products, our business is exposed to seasonal fluctuations in demand for nitrogen fertilizer products in the agricultural industry. In addition, the demand for fertilizers is affected by the aggregate crop planting decisions and fertilizer application rate decisions of individual farmers who make planting decisions based largely on the prospective profitability of a harvest. The specific varieties and amounts of fertilizer they apply depend on factors like crop prices, farmers'farmers’ current liquidity, soil conditions, weather patterns, and the types of crops planted. We typically experience higher pricingnet sales in the first half of the calendar year, which we referis referred to as the planting season, and our pricing tendsnet sales tend to be lower during the second half of each calendar year, which we referis referred to as the fill season.

Environmental Matters

Our business is subject to extensive and frequently changing federal, state, and local environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations governing the emission and release of hazardous substances into the environment, the transportation, storage, and disposal of waste, the treatment and discharge of waste waterwastewater and stormwater, and the storage, handling, use, and transportation of our nitrogen fertilizer products. These laws and regulations their underlying regulatory requirements and the enforcement thereof impact us by imposing:
restrictions on operations or the need to install enhanced or additional controls;
the need to obtain and comply with permits and authorizations;
liability for the investigation and remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater at current and former facilities (if any) and for off-site waste disposal locations; and
specifications for the products we market, primarily UAN and ammonia.
December 31, 2020 | 8


Table of Contents

Our operations require numerous permits, licenses, and authorizations. Failure to comply with these permits or environmental laws and regulations generally could result in fines, penalties, or other sanctions or a revocation of our permits. In addition, the laws and regulations to which we are subject are often evolving and many of them have or could become more stringent or have become subject to more stringent interpretation or enforcement by federal or state agencies. These laws and regulations could result in increased capital, operating, and compliance costs or result in delays or limits to our operations or growth while attempting to obtain required permits.costs.

The principal environmental risks associated with our business are outlined below, with additional details included in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors and Note 13 ("Commitments and Contingencies") to Part II, Item 8 of this Report.
The Federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”)

The federal Clean Air ActCAA and its implementing regulations, as well as the corresponding state laws and regulations that regulategoverning air emissions, of pollutants into the air, affect us both directly and indirectly. Direct impacts may occur through the federal Clean Air Act'sCAA’s permitting requirements andand/or emission control requirements relating to specific air pollutants, as well as the requirement to maintain a risk management program to help prevent accidental releases of certain regulated substances. The CAA affects the Partnership by extensively regulating the air emissions of sulfur dioxide (“SO2”), volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and other substances, including those emitted by mobile sources, which are direct or indirect users of our products. Some or all of the standardsregulations promulgated pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act,CAA, or any future promulgations of standards,regulations, may require the installation of controls or changes to our nitrogen fertilizer facilities in order(collectively referred to comply.as the “Facilities”) to maintain compliance. If new controls or changes to operations are needed, the costs could be material. These new requirements, other requirements of the federal Clean Air Act, or other presently existing or future environmental regulations could cause us to expend substantial resources to comply and/or permit our facilities to produce products that meet applicable requirements.

The regulation of air emissions under the federal Clean Air ActCAA requires that we obtain various construction and operating permits and incur capital expenditures for the installation of certain air pollution control devices at our operations. Various regulationsstandards and programs specific to our operations have been implemented, such as the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants, the New Source Performance Standards, and the New Source Review.
Release Reporting
The EPA regulates GHG emissions under the Clean Air Act. In October 2009, the EPA finalized a rule requiring certain large emitters of GHGs to inventory and report their GHG emissions to the EPA. In accordance with the rule, our Facilities monitor and report our GHG emissions to the EPA. In May 2010, the EPA finalized the “Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule,” which established GHG emissions thresholds that determine when stationary sources, such as the nitrogen fertilizer plants, must obtain permits under Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) and Title V programs of the CAA. Under the rule, facilities already subject to the PSD and Title V programs that increase their emissions of GHGs by a significant amount are required to undergo PSD review and to evaluate and implement air pollution control technology, known as “best available control technology,” to reduce GHG emissions.

The Biden Administration has signaled that it will take steps to address climate change.On January 27, 2021, the White House issued its Executive Order on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, as well as a formal notification re-accepting entry of the United States into the Paris Agreement.

The EPA’s approach to regulating GHG emissions may change again under future administrations. Therefore, the impact on our Facilities due to future GHG regulation is unknown.

Recent Greenhouse Gas Footprint Reduction Efforts

In October 2020, the Partnership announced that it generated its first carbon offset credits from voluntary nitrous oxide abatement at its Coffeyville Facility. The Partnership has similar nitrous oxide abatement efforts at its East Dubuque Facility. According to the EPA, nitrous oxide represents approximately 7% of carbon dioxide-equivalent (“CO2e”) emissions in the United States.

The Partnership previously entered into a Joint Development Agreement with ClimeCo, a pioneer in the development of emission-reduction projects for nitric acid plants, to jointly design, install and operate a tertiary abatement system at one of its nitric acid plants in Coffeyville. The system was designed to abate 94% of all N2O in the unit while preventing the release of approximately 450,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent on an annualized basis. The N2O abatement systems at the East Dubuque Facility’s two nitric acid plants have abated, on average, the annual release of approximately 233,000 metric tons of CO2e during the past five years.

December 31, 2020 | 9


Table of Contents
CVR Partners’ N2O abatement projects are registered with the Climate Action Reserve (the “Reserve”), a carbon offset registry for the North American market. The Reserve employs high-quality standards and an independent third-party verification process to issue its carbon credits, known as Climate Reserve Tonnes.

The Partnership also sequesters carbon dioxide that is not utilized for urea production at its Coffeyville Facility by capturing and purifying the CO2 as part of its manufacturing process and then transferred to its partner, Perdure Petroleum LLC, that compresses and ships the CO2 for sequestration through Enhanced Oil Recovery (“EOR”). In January 2021, the Internal Revenue Service published final regulations under Section 45Q which provides tax credits to encourage CO2 sequestration. We believe that our process for CO2 sequestration would qualify for tax credits under Section 45Q and intend to pursue a claim of those credits starting in 2021.

Combining our nitrous oxide abatement and CO2 sequestration activities reduces our CO2e footprint by over 1 million metric tons per year. In addition, our Coffeyville Facility is uniquely qualified to produce hydrogen and ammonia that could be certified ‘blue’ to a market that is increasingly demanding reduced carbon footprints. These greenhouse gas footprint reduction efforts support our core Values of Environment and Continuous Improvement, and our goal of continuing to produce nitrogen fertilizers that feed the world’s growing population in the most environmentally responsible way possible.

The Federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”)

The CWA and its implementing regulations, as well as the corresponding state laws and regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants into the water, affect the Partnership. The CWA’s permitting requirements establish discharge limitations that may be based on technology standards, water quality standards, and restrictions on the total maximum daily load of pollutants allowed to enter a particular water body based on its use. In January 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) announced that it is undertaking a plan to review, and update effluent standards for many industries. EPA is prioritizing those sectors that are ranked high in point source categories for total nitrogen discharges, including fertilizer manufacturers. The EPA’s review eventually could result in different regulations governing the Partnership. In addition, water resources are becoming and in the future may become more scarce. The Coffeyville Fertilizer Facility has contracts in place to receive water during certain water shortage conditions, but these conditions could change over time depending on the scarcity of water.

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (“EPCRA”)

The release of hazardous substances or extremely hazardous substances into the environment is subject to release reporting requirements under federal and state environmental laws. WeOur Facilities also periodically experience releases of hazardous orand extremely hazardous substances from ourtheir equipment. Our facilities periodically have excess emission events from flaring and other planned and unplanned startup, shutdown and malfunction events. Such releases are reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") and relevant state and local agencies. From time to time, the EPA has conducted inspections and issued information requests to us with respect to our compliance with release reporting requirements under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, CompensationCERCLA and Liability Act ("CERCLA") and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act.EPCRA. If we fail to timely or properly report a release, or if thea release violates the law or our permits, itwe could cause us to become the subject of a governmental enforcement action or third-party claims. Government enforcement or third-party claims relating to releases of hazardous or extremely hazardous substances could result in significant expenditures and liability.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, Climate change laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions, of this Report for further discussion of the Greenhouse Gas ("GHG") Emissions regulations.
Environmental Remediation

As is the case with all companies engaged in similar industries, we face potential exposure from future claims and lawsuits involving environmental matters, including soil and water contamination and personal injury or property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances that we manufactured, handled, used, stored, transported, spilled, disposed of, or released. We cannot assure youThere is no assurance that we will not become involved in future proceedings related to ourthe release of hazardous or extremely hazardous substances for which we have potential liability or that, if we were held responsible for damages in any existing or future proceedings, such costs would be covered by insurance or would not be material.

Environmental Insurance

We are covered by CVR Energy'sEnergy’s site pollution legal liability insurance policy. The policy, which includes business interruption coverage. The policy insures any location owned, leased, rented, or operated by the Partnership, including our nitrogen fertilizer facilities.Facilities. The policy insures certain pollution conditions at, or migrating from, a covered location, certain waste transportation and disposal activities, and business interruption.
December 31, 2020 | 10


Table of Contents

In addition to the site pollution legal liability insurance policy, we benefit frommaintain umbrella and excess casualty insurance polices which include sudden and accidental pollution coverage policies maintained by CVR Energy. This insurance provides coverage due to named perils for claims involving pollutants where the discharge is sudden and accidental and first commences at a specific day and time during the policy period.

The site pollution legal liability policy and the pollution coverage provided in the casualty insurance policies are subject to retentions and deductibles and contain discovery requirements, reporting requirements, exclusions, definitions, conditions, and limitations that could apply to a particular pollution claim, and there can be no assurance such claim will be adequately insured for all potential damages.


Health, Safety, Health and Security Matters

We are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations related to safety, including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Act ("OSHA"(“OSHA”), and comparable state statutes, the purposepurposes of which are to protect the health and safety of workers. We also are subject to OSHA Process Safety Management regulations, which are designed to prevent or minimize the consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive, flammable, or explosive chemicals.

Our Facilities are subject to the Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Standards (“CFATS”), a regulatory program designed to ensure facilities have security measures in place to reduce the risk that certain hazardous chemicals are weaponized by terrorists. In addition, the East Dubuque Facility is regulated under the Maritime Transportation Security Act.

We operate a comprehensive safety, health, and security program, with participation by employees, consultants, and advisors at all levels of the organization. We have developed comprehensive safety programs aimed at preventing OSHA recordable incidents. Despite our efforts to achieve excellence in our safety and health performance, there can be no assurances that there will not be accidents resulting in injuries or even fatalities. We routinely audit our programs and consider improvements inseek to continually improve our management systems.
Employees
Human Capital

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had 304 direct employees. As287 employees across both Facilities and related marketing and logistics operations, all of December 31, 2017,which are located in the U.S. Of these, 94 employees are covered by health insurance, disability and retirement plans established by CVR Energy. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good.
As of December 31, 2017, the Coffeyville Facility employed 151 of our employees, of whom none were unionized. As of December 31, 2017, the East Dubuque Facility employed 148 of our employees, about 64% of whom were represented by the International Union of United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers under a collective bargaining agreement that expires in October 2019.
agreements with various labor unions. We may leverage independent contractors, workers to provide flexibility for our business and operating needs. We also rely on the services of employees of CVR Energy and its subsidiaries pursuant to a services agreement between us, CVR Energy, and our general partner. Additionally,We believe that our future success largely depends upon our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees. We are committed to wages and benefits that are competitive with a market-based, pay for performance compensation philosophy.

Our core Values define the Partnership's general partner managesway we do business every day. We put safety first, care for our environment, require high business ethics and integrity consistent with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, and are proud members of and good neighbors to the Partnership's operationscommunities where we operate. We believe in continuous improvement for individuals to achieve their maximum potential through teamwork, diversity and activitiespersonal development. Our employees provide the energy behind our core Values to achieve excellence for all our key stakeholders – employees, communities and unitholders. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” in Part II, Item 7 for further discussion on our core Values.

We are an equal opportunity employer and are committed to maintaining a diverse and inclusive work environment free from harassment and discrimination regardless of race, religion, color, age, gender, disability, minority, sexual orientation or any other protected class. Our commitment to diversity and inclusion helps us attract and retain the best talent, enables employees to realize their full potential, and drives high performance through innovation and collaboration.

We have an unwavering commitment to providing as specified in the partnership agreementsafe and had 4 employeeshealthy workplace as of possible for all employees. We accomplish this through strict compliance with applicable laws and regulations regarding workplace safety, and maintaining robust training and emergency and disaster recovery plans.

December 31, 2017. For more information on these agreements, see Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") to Part II. Item 82020 | 11


Table of this Report.Contents
Available Information

Our website address is www.cvrpartners.com.www.CVRPartners.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge through our website under "Investor“Investor Relations," as soon as reasonably practicable after the electronic filing or furnishing of these reports is made with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"“SEC”). at www.sec.gov. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Codes of Ethics and Business Conduct, and the Chartercharter of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the CompensationEnvironmental, Health, and Safety Committee of the Board of Directors of our general partner are available on our website. These guidelines, policies, and charters are also available in print without charge to any unitholder requesting them. We do not intend for information contained in our website to be part of this Report.

December 31, 2020 | 12


Table of Contents
Item 1A.    Risk Factors
You should carefully consider each of the
The following risks should be considered together with the other information contained in this Report and all of the information set forth in our filings with the SEC. If any of the following risks andor uncertainties develops into actual events, our business, financial condition cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case, we might not be ableReferences to pay distributions on our common units,CVR Partners, the trading pricePartnership, “we”, “us”, and “our” may refer to consolidated subsidiaries of our common units could decline, and you could lose allCVR Partners or partone or both of your investment. Although many of our business risks are comparable to those faced by a corporation engaged in a similar business, limited partner interests are inherently different from the capital stock of a corporation and involve additional risks described below.facilities, as the context may require.

Risks Related to Our Business
We may not have sufficient cash available to pay any quarterly distribution
The COVID-19 pandemic, and actions taken in response thereto, could materially adversely affect our business, operations, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic and actions of governments and others in response thereto is negatively impacting worldwide economic and commercial activity and financial markets. The COVID-19 pandemic has also resulted in significant business and operational disruptions, including closures, supply chain disruptions, travel restrictions, stay-at-home orders, and limitations on our common units. Furthermore, we are not required to make distributions to holders of our common units on a quarterly basis or otherwise,the availability and may elect to distribute less than all of our available cash.
We may not have sufficient cash available each quarter to enable us to pay any distributions to our common unitholders. Furthermore, our partnership agreement does not require us to pay distributions on a quarterly basis or otherwise. Although our general partner's current policy is to distribute all of our available cash on a quarterly basis. Available cash is defined as Adjusted EBITDA reduced for cash needed for (i) net cash interest expense (excluding capitalized interest) and debt service and other contractual obligations; (ii) maintenance capital expenditures; and (iii) to the extent applicable, major scheduled turnaround expenses, reserves for future operating or capital needs that the board of directorseffectiveness of the workforce. Further, if general partner deems necessary or appropriate,economic conditions continue to remain uncertain for an extended period of time, our liquidity and expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger, if any. Available cash for distributionability to repay our outstanding debt may be increased by the release of previously established cash reserves, if any, at the discretionharmed. The full impact of the boardCOVID-19 pandemic is unknown and is rapidly evolving. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacts our business and operations, including the availability and pricing of directors of our general partner and available cash is increased by the business interruption insurance proceeds. The board of directors of our general partner may at any time, for any reason, change this policy or decide not to pay cash distributions on a quarterly basis or other basis. The amount of cash wefeedstocks, will be able to distribute on our common units principally dependsdepend on the amount of cash we generate from our operations, which is directly dependent upon the operating margins we generate, which have been volatile historically. Our operating margins are significantly affected by the market-driven UANseverity, location, and ammonia prices we are able to charge our customers and our production costs, as well as seasonality, weather conditions, governmental regulation, unscheduled maintenance or downtime at our facilities and global and domestic demand for nitrogen fertilizer products, among other factors. In addition:
The amount of distributions we pay, if any, and the decision to make any distribution at all will be determined by the board of directors of our general partner, whose interests may differ from those of our common unitholders. Our general partner has limited fiduciary and contractual duties, which may permit it to favor its own interests or the interests of CVR Energy to the detriment of our common unitholders.
Our current debt instruments, and debt instruments that we enter into in the future, may limit the distributions that we can make.
The actual amount of available cash depends on numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control, including UAN and ammonia prices, our operating costs, global and domestic demand for nitrogen fertilizer products, fluctuations in our working capital needs, and the amount of fees and expenses incurred by us.
The amount of our quarterly cash distributions, if any, will vary significantly both quarterly and annually and will be directly dependent on the performance of our business.
We expect our business performance will be more seasonal and volatile, and our cash flows will be less stable, than the business performance and cash flows of most publicly traded partnerships. As a result, our quarterly cash distributions will be volatile and are expected to vary quarterly and annually. Unlike most publicly traded partnerships, we do not have a minimum quarterly distribution or employ structures intended to consistently maintain or increase distributions over time. The amount of our quarterly cash distributions will be directly dependent on the performance of our business, which has been volatile historically as a result of volatile nitrogen fertilizer and natural gas prices, and seasonal and global fluctuations in demand for nitrogen fertilizer products. Because our quarterly distributions will be subject to significant fluctuations, future quarterly distributions paid to our common unitholders will vary significantly from quarter to quarter and may be zero.

The board of directors of our general partner may modify or revoke our cash distribution policy at any time at its discretion, including in such a manner that would result in an elimination of cash distributions regardlessduration of the amounteffects and spread of available cash we generate. Our partnership agreement does not require usCOVID-19, the actions undertaken by national, regional, and local governments and health officials to make any distributions at all.contain such virus or remedy its effects, and if, how quickly and to what extent economic conditions recover and normal business and operating conditions resume.

Our general partner's current policy is to distribute all of the available cash we generate each quarter to common unitholders of record on a pro rata basis. However, the board of directors of our general partner may change such policy at any time at its discretion and could elect not to make distributions for one or more quarters regardless of the amount of available cash we generate. Our partnership agreement does not require us to make any distributions at all. Any modification or revocation of our cash distribution policy could substantially reduce or eliminate the amounts of distributions to our common unitholders.
The nitrogen fertilizer business is, and nitrogen fertilizer prices are, cyclical and highly volatile, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and have experienced substantial downturns in the past. Cycles in demand and pricing could potentially expose us to significant fluctuations in our operating and financial results, and expose you to substantial volatility in our quarterly cash distributions and material reductions in the trading price of our common units.flows.
We are exposed to fluctuations in
Demand for nitrogen fertilizer products is dependent on fluctuating demand infor crop nutrients by the global agricultural industry. These fluctuations historically have had and could in the future have significant effects on prices across all nitrogen fertilizer products and, in turn, our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations, which could result in significant volatility or material reductions in the price of our common units or an inability to make quarterlyfinancial condition and cash distributions on our common units.
flows.Nitrogen fertilizer products are commodities, the price of which can be highly volatile. The priceprices of nitrogen fertilizer products depend on a number of factors, including general economic conditions, cyclical trends in end-user markets, supply and demand imbalances, governmental policies, and weather conditions, which have a greater relevance because of the seasonal nature of fertilizer application. If seasonal demand exceeds the projections on which we base our production ourlevels, customers may acquire nitrogen fertilizer products from our competitors, and our profitability willmay be negatively impacted. If seasonal demand is less than expected, we expect, we willmay be left with excess inventory that will have to be stored or liquidated.
Demand for nitrogen fertilizer products is dependent on demand for crop nutrients by the global agricultural industry. The international market for nitrogen fertilizers is influenced by such factors as the relative value of the U.S. dollar and its impact upon the cost of importing nitrogen fertilizers, foreign agricultural policies, the existence of, or changes in, import or foreign currency exchange barriers in certain foreign markets, changes in the hard currency demands of certain countries and other regulatory policies of foreign governments, as well as the laws and policies of the United StatesU.S. affecting foreign trade and investment. Nitrogen-based fertilizers remain solidly in demand, driven by a growing world population, changes in dietary habits and an expanded use of corn for the production of ethanol. Supply is affected by available capacity and operating rates, raw material costs, government policies and global trade. A decrease in nitrogen fertilizer prices would have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow and ability to make distributions.

Nitrogen fertilizer products and our business face intense competition.

Our internally generatedbusiness is subject to intense price competition from both U.S. and foreign sources. With little or no product differentiation, customers make their purchasing decisions principally on the basis of delivered price and availability of the product. Increased global supply or decreases in transportation costs for foreign sources of fertilizer may put downward pressure on fertilizer prices. We compete with a number of U.S. producers and producers in other countries, including state-owned and government-subsidized entities that may have greater total resources and are less dependent on earnings from fertilizer sales, which make them less vulnerable to industry downturns and better positioned to pursue new expansion and development opportunities. An inability to compete successfully could result in a loss of customers, which could adversely affect our sales, profitability and cash flows and other sources of liquidity may not be adequate for our capital needs. As a result, we may not be able to pay any cash distributions to our common unitholders and the trading price of our common units may be adversely impacted.
If we cannot generate adequate cash flow or otherwise secure sufficient liquidity to meet our working capital needs or support our short-term and long-term capital requirements, we may be unable to meet our debt obligations, pursue our business strategies or comply with certain environmental standards, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. As of December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $49.2 million and had availability under the ABL Credit Facility of $43.8 million.
The costs associated with operating our nitrogen fertilizer plants include significant fixed costs. If nitrogen fertilizer prices fall below a certain level, we may not generate sufficient revenue to operate profitably or cover our costs and our ability to make distributions will be adversely impacted.
Unlike our competitors, whose primary costs are related to the purchase of natural gas and whose costs are therefore largely variable, our Coffeyville Facility has largely fixed costs. In addition, while less than our Coffeyville Facility, our East Dubuque Facility has a significant amount of fixed costs. As a result of the fixed cost nature of our operations, downtime, interruptions or low productivity due to reduced demand, adverse weather conditions, equipment failure, a decrease in nitrogen fertilizer prices or other causes can result in significant operating losses, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.

Continued low natural gas prices could impact our Coffeyville Facility's relative competitive position when compared to other nitrogen fertilizer producers.
Most nitrogen fertilizer manufacturers rely on natural gas as their primary feedstock, and the cost of natural gas is a large component of the total production cost for natural gas-based nitrogen fertilizer manufacturers. Low natural gas prices benefit our competitors and disproportionately impact our operations by making us less competitive with natural gas-based nitrogen fertilizer manufacturers. Continued low natural gas prices could impair the ability of our Coffeyville Facility to compete with other nitrogen fertilizer producers who utilize natural gas as their primary feedstock if nitrogen fertilizer pricing drops as a result of low natural gas prices, and, therefore, have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial conditioncondition.


December 31, 2020 | 13


Table of Contents
Our business is geographically concentrated and abilityis therefore subject to make cash distributions.regional economic downturns and seasonal variations, which may affect our production levels, transportation costs and inventory and working capital levels.
The market for natural gas has been volatile. Natural gas prices
Our sales to agricultural customers are currently at a relative low point. An increaseconcentrated in natural gas prices could impact our East Dubuque Facility's relative competitive position when compared to other foreignthe Great Plains and domesticMidwest states, and nitrogen fertilizer producers,demand is seasonal. Our quarterly results may vary significantly from one year to the next due largely to weather-related shifts in planting schedules and if pricespurchase patterns. Because we build inventory during low demand periods, the accumulation of inventory to be available for natural gas increaseseasonal sales creates significant seasonal working capital and storage capacity requirements. The degree of seasonality can change significantly we may not be able to economically operate our East Dubuque Facility.
The operation of our East Dubuque Facility with natural gas as the primary feedstock exposes us to market riskfrom year-to-year due to increases in natural gas prices, particularly if the price of natural gasconditions in the United States were to become higher thanagricultural industry and other factors. As a consequence of this seasonality, distributions of available cash, if any, may be volatile and may vary quarterly and annually.

Our sales volumes depend on significant customers, and the priceloss of natural gas outside the United States. An increase in natural gas prices would impact our East Dubuque Facility's operations by making us less competitive with competitors who do not use natural gas as their primary feedstock, and could thereforeseveral significant customers may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, if natural gas prices

We have a significant concentration of customers. Our two largest customers represented approximately 26% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2020. Given the nature of our business, and consistent with industry practice, we do not have long-term minimum purchase contracts with our customers. The loss of several of these significant customers, or a significant reduction in the United States were to increase relative to pricespurchase volume by several of natural gas paid by foreign nitrogen fertilizer producers, this may negatively affect our competitive position in the corn belt and thusthem, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
The profitability of operating our East Dubuque Facility is significantly dependent on the cost of natural gas, and our East Dubuque Facility operated at certain times, and could operate in the future, at a net loss. Local factors may affect the price of natural gas available to us, in addition to factors that determine the benchmark prices of natural gas. We expect to purchase natural gas on the spot market and to enter into forward purchase contracts. Since we expect to purchase a portion of our natural gas for use in our East Dubuque Facility on the spot market, we remain susceptible to fluctuations in the price of natural gas in general and in local markets in particular. We also expect to use short-term, fixed supply, fixed price forward purchase contracts to lock in pricing for a portion of our natural gas requirements. Our ability to enter into forward purchase contracts is dependent upon our creditworthiness and, in the event of a deterioration in our credit, counterparties could refuse to enter into forward purchase contracts on acceptable terms. If we are unable to enter into forward purchase contracts for the supply of natural gas, we would need to purchase natural gas on the spot market, which would impair our ability to hedge our exposure to risk from fluctuations in natural gas prices. If we enter into forward purchase contracts for natural gas, and natural gas prices decrease, then our cost of sales could be higher than it would have been in the absence of the forward purchase contracts.
Any interruption in the supply of natural gas to our East Dubuque Facility through Nicor Inc. ("Nicor") could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our East Dubuque operations depend on the availability of natural gas. We have an agreement with Nicor pursuant to which we access natural gas from the ANR Pipeline Company and Northern Natural Gas pipelines. Our access to satisfactory supplies of natural gas through Nicor could be disrupted due to a number of causes, including volume limitations under the agreement, pipeline malfunctions, service interruptions, mechanical failures or other reasons. The agreement extends through October 31, 2019. Upon expiration of the agreement, we may be unable to extend the service under the terms of the existing agreement or renew the agreement on satisfactory terms, or at all. Any disruption in the supply of natural gas to our East Dubuque Facility could restrict our ability to continue to make products at the facility. In the event we need to obtain natural gas from another source, we would need to build a new connection from that source to our East Dubuque Facility and negotiate related easement rights, which would be costly, disruptive and/or may be unfeasible. As a result, any interruption in the supply of natural gas through Nicor could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Any decline in U.S. agricultural production or limitations on the use of nitrogen fertilizer for agricultural purposes could have a material adverse effect on the sales of nitrogen fertilizer, and on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.flows.

Conditions in the U.S. agricultural industry significantly impact our operating results. The U.S. agricultural industry can be affected by a number of factors, including weather patterns and field conditions, current and projected grain inventories and prices, domestic and international population changes, demand for U.S. agricultural products, and U.S., state and foreign policies regarding trade in agricultural products.products, and changes in governmental regulations and incentives for corn-based ethanol production that could affect future ethanol demand and production.


State and federal governmental policies, including farm and biofuel subsidies and commodity support programs, as well as the prices of fertilizer products, may also directly or indirectly influence the number of acres planted, the mix of crops planted and the use of fertilizers for particular agricultural applications. Developments in crop technology such as nitrogen fixation (the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen into compounds that plants can assimilate), could also reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and adversely affect the demand for nitrogen fertilizer. In addition, from time to time various state legislatures have considered limitations on the use and application of chemical fertilizers due to concerns about the impact of these products on the environment. Unfavorable state and federal governmental policies could negatively affect nitrogen fertilizer prices and therefore have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition abilityand cash flows.

We are subject to make cash distributions.cybersecurity risks and other cyber incidents resulting in disruption to our business.
A major factor underlying
We depend on internal and third-party information technology systems to manage and support our operations, and we collect, process, and retain sensitive and confidential customer information in the current high levelnormal course of demand for nitrogen-based fertilizer products isbusiness. Despite the productionsecurity measures we have in place and any additional measures we may implement in the future, our facilities and these systems could be vulnerable to security breaches, computer viruses, lost or misplaced data, programming errors, human errors, acts of ethanol. A decreasevandalism, or other events. Any disruption of these systems or security breach or event resulting in ethanol production, an increase in ethanol importsthe misappropriation, loss or a shift away from corn as a principal raw material usedother unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, whether by us directly or our third-party service providers, could damage our reputation, expose us to produce ethanol could have a material adverse effect onthe risks of litigation and liability, disrupt our business, or otherwise affect our results of operations, financial condition and abilityoperations.

Risks Related to make cash distributions.Our Plant Operations
A major factor underlying the solid level of demand for nitrogen-based fertilizer products is the production of ethanol in the United States and the use of corn in ethanol production. Ethanol production in the United States is highly dependent upon a myriad of federal statutes and regulations, and is made significantly more competitive by various federal and state incentives and mandated usage of renewable fuels pursuant to the federal Renewable Fuel Standards ("RFS"). To date, the RFS has been satisfied primarily with fuel ethanol blended into gasoline. However, a number of factors, including the continuing "food versus fuel" debate and studies showing that expanded ethanol usage may increase the level of greenhouse gases in the environment as well as be unsuitable for small engine use, have resulted in calls to reduce subsidies for ethanol, allow increased ethanol imports and to repeal or waive (in whole or in part) the current RFS, any of which could have an adverse effect on corn-based ethanol production, planted corn acreage and fertilizer demand. Therefore, ethanol incentive programs may not be renewed, or if renewed, they may be renewed on terms significantly less favorable to ethanol producers than current incentive programs.
In late 2013, the EPA recognized that the transportation fuels market had reached the “blend wall” for ethanol. The blend wall refers to the aggregate limit to which ethanol can be blended into gasoline, and is generally considered to be reached when a gallon of transportation fuel contains 10% ethanol by volume. As a result, since 2013, the EPA has used its waiver authorities to set lower renewable volume obligations than those mandated by the RFS, though those volumes still generally increase year-over-year as demand for transportation fuel also increases. Even so, the most recent volume mandates have resulted in or are expected to result in renewable fuel being blended in volumes that exceed the ethanol blend wall, forcing the use of higher ethanol fuel blends or non-ethanol renewable fuel. The EPA continues to articulate a policy to incentivize additional investments in renewable fuel blending and distribution infrastructure. Any substantial decrease in future renewable volume obligations under the RFS could have a material adverse effect on ethanol production in the United States, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
Further, while most ethanol is currently produced from corn and other raw grains, such as milo or sorghum, the RFS requires that a portion of the overall RFS renewable fuel mandate comes from advanced biofuels, including cellulose-based biomass, such as agricultural waste, forest residue, municipal solid waste, energy crops (plants grown for use to make biofuels or directly exploited for their energy content) and biomass-based diesel. In addition, there is a continuing trend to encourage the use of products other than corn and raw grains for ethanol production. If this trend is successful, the demand for corn may decrease significantly, which could reduce demand for our nitrogen fertilizer products and have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions. This potential impact on the demand for nitrogen fertilizer products; however, could be slightly offset by the potential market for nitrogen fertilizer product usage in connection with the production of cellulosic biofuels.
Nitrogen fertilizer products are global commodities, and we face intense competition from other nitrogen fertilizer producers.
Our business is subject to intense price competition from both U.S. and foreign sources, including competitors operating in the Middle East, the Asia-Pacific region, the Caribbean, Russia and the Ukraine. Fertilizers are global commodities, with little or no product differentiation, and customers make their purchasing decisions principally on the basis of delivered price and availability of the product. Increased global supply may put downward pressure on fertilizer prices. Furthermore, in recent years the price of nitrogen fertilizer in the United States has been substantially driven by pricing in the global fertilizer market. We compete with a number of U.S. producers and producers in other countries, including state-owned and government-subsidized entities. Some competitors have greater total resources and are less dependent on earnings from fertilizer sales, which make them less vulnerable to industry downturns and better positioned to pursue new expansion and development opportunities. Increased domestic supply may put downward pressure on fertilizer prices. Competitors utilizing different corporate structures may be better able to withstand lower cash flows than we can as a limited partnership. Our competitive

position could suffer to the extent we are not able to expand our own resources either through investments in new or existing operations or through acquisitions, joint ventures or partnerships. An inability to compete successfully could result in the loss of customers, which could adversely affect our sales and profitability, and our ability to make cash distributions.
Adverse weather conditions during peak fertilizer application periods may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions, because our agricultural customers are geographically concentrated.
Our sales of nitrogen fertilizer products to agricultural customers are concentrated in the Great Plains and Midwest states and are seasonal in nature. Accordingly, an adverse weather pattern affecting agriculture in these regions or during the planting season could have a negative effect on fertilizer demand, which could, in turn, result in a material decline in our net sales and margins and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions. Our quarterly results may vary significantly from one year to the next due largely to weather-related shifts in planting schedules and purchase patterns. In addition, given the seasonal nature of our business, we expect that our distributions will be volatile and will vary quarterly and annually.
Our business is seasonal, which may result in our carrying significant amounts of inventory and seasonal variations in working capital. Our inability to predict future seasonal nitrogen fertilizer demand accurately may result in excess inventory or product shortages.
Our business is seasonal. Farmers tend to apply nitrogen fertilizer during two short application periods, one in the spring and the other in the fall. In contrast, we and other nitrogen fertilizer producers generally produce our products throughout the year. As a result, we and our customers generally build inventories during the low demand periods of the year in order to ensure timely product availability during the peak sales seasons. Variations in the proportion of product sold through prepaid sales contracts and variations in the terms of such contracts can increase the seasonal volatility of our cash flows and cause changes in the patterns of seasonal volatility from year-to-year.
In most instances, our East Dubuque customers take delivery of our nitrogen products at our East Dubuque Facility. Customers arrange and pay to transport our nitrogen products to their final destinations. At our East Dubuque Facility, inventories are accumulated to allow for customer to take delivery to meet the seasonal demand, which require significant storage capacity. The accumulation of inventory to be available for seasonal sales creates significant seasonal working capital requirements.
Most of our Coffeyville Facility nitrogen products are delivered by railcar to our customer's storage facilities. Therefore, we are less dependent on storage capacity at the Coffeyville Facility and, as a result, experience lower seasonal fluctuations as compared to our East Dubuque Facility. The seasonality of nitrogen fertilizer demand results in our sales volumes and net sales being highest during the North American spring season and our working capital requirements typically being highest just prior to the start of the spring season.
If seasonal demand exceeds our projections, we may not have enough product and our customers may acquire products from our competitors, which would negatively impact our profitability. If seasonal demand is less than we expect, we may be left with excess inventory and higher working capital and liquidity requirements.
The degree of seasonality of our business can change significantly from year to year due to conditions in the agricultural industry and other factors. As a consequence of our seasonality, we expect that our distributions will be volatile and will vary quarterly and annually.
Our operations are dependent on third-party suppliers, including the following: Linde, which owns an air separation plant that provides oxygen, nitrogen and compressed dry air to our Coffeyville Facility; the City of Coffeyville, which supplies the Coffeyville Facility with electricity; and Jo-Carroll Energy, Inc. ("Jo-Carroll Energy"), which supplies our East Dubuque Facility with electricity. A deterioration in the financial condition of a third-party supplier, a mechanical problem with the air separation plant, or the inability of a third-party supplier to perform in accordance with its contractual obligations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and on our ability to make cash distributions.
Our Coffeyville Facility operations depend in large part on the performance of third-party suppliers, including Linde for the supply of oxygen, nitrogen and compressed dry air, and the City of Coffeyville for the supply of electricity. With respect to Linde, the operations of our Coffeyville Facility could be adversely affected if there were a deterioration in Linde's financial condition such that the operation of the air separation plant located adjacent to our Coffeyville Facility was disrupted. Additionally, this air separation plant in the past has experienced numerous short-term interruptions, causing interruptions in our gasifier operations. With respect to electricity, we are party to an electric services agreement with the City of Coffeyville, Kansas which gives us an option to extend the term of such agreement through June 30, 2024.

Our East Dubuque Facility operations also depend in large part on the performance of third-party suppliers, including, Jo-Carroll Energy for the purchase of electricity. We entered into a utility service agreement with Jo-Carroll Energy, which terminates on May 31, 2019 and will continue year-to-year thereafter unless either party provides 12-month advance written notice of termination.
Should Linde, the City of Coffeyville, Jo-Carroll Energy or any of our other third-party suppliers fail to perform in accordance with existing contractual arrangements, or should we otherwise lose the service of any third-party suppliers, our operations (or a portion of our operations) could be forced to halt. Alternative sources of supply could be difficult to obtain. Any shutdown of our operations, (or a portion of our operations), even for a limited period, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
Our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions may be adversely affected by the supply and price levels of pet coke. Failure by CVR RefiningEnergy’s Coffeyville refinery to continue to supply our Coffeyville Facilityus with pet coke (to the extent third-party pet coke is unavailable or available only at higher prices), or CVR Refining's imposition of an obligation to provide it with security for our payment obligations, could negatively impact our results of operations.
Our
Unlike our competitors, whose primary costs are related to the purchase of natural gas and whose costs are therefore largely variable, our Coffeyville Facility'sFacility uses a pet coke gasification process to produce nitrogen fertilizer. Our profitability is directly affected by the price and availability of pet coke obtained from CVR Refining'sEnergy’s Coffeyville Kansas crude oil refinery pursuant to a long-term agreement andagreement. Our Coffeyville Facility has obtained the majority of its pet coke purchased from third parties, both of which vary based on market prices. Pet coke is a key raw material used by our Coffeyville Facility in the manufacture of nitrogen fertilizer products. If pet coke costs increase, we may not be able to increase our prices to recover these increased costs, because market prices for our nitrogen fertilizer products are not correlated with pet coke prices.
Based on our current output, we obtain most (over 70% on average during the last five years) of the pet coke we need for our Coffeyville Facility from CVR Refining's adjacent crude oilEnergy’s Coffeyville refinery and procureover the remainder on the open market. The price that we paypast five years, although this percentage has decreased to 33% in 2020. However, should CVR Refining for pet coke is based on the lesserEnergy’s Coffeyville refinery
December 31, 2020 | 14


Table of a pet coke price derived from the price we receive for UAN (subject to a UAN-based price ceiling and floor) and a pet coke index price. In most cases, the price we pay CVR Refining will be lower than the price which we would otherwise pay to third parties. Pet coke prices could significantly increase in the future. Should CVR Refining Contents
fail to perform in accordance with ourthe existing agreement or to the extent pet coke from CVR Energy’s Coffeyville refinery is insufficient, we would need to purchase pet coke from third parties on the open market, which could negatively impact our results of operations to the extent third-party pet coke is unavailable or available only at higher prices.
We may not be able to maintain an adequate supply of pet coke. In addition, Currently, we could experience production delays or cost increases if alternative sources of supply prove to be more expensive or difficult to obtain. We currently purchase 100% of the pet coke produced by CVR Refining'sEnergy’s Coffeyville refinery. Accordingly, ifrefinery produces. However, we increaseare still required to procure additional pet coke from third parties to maintain our production we will be more dependent on pet coke purchases from third-party suppliers at open market prices.rates. We are currently party to a pet coke supply agreementagreements with HollyFrontier Corporation.multiple third-party refineries to provide a significant amount of pet coke at fixed prices. The termterms of this agreement endsthese agreements currently end in December 2018. There2021.

The market for natural gas has been volatile, and fluctuations in natural gas prices could affect our competitive position.

Low natural gas prices benefit our competitors that rely on natural gas as their primary feedstock and disproportionately impact our operations at our Coffeyville Fertilizer Facility by making us less competitive with natural gas-based nitrogen fertilizer manufacturers. Continued low natural gas prices could result in nitrogen fertilizer pricing drops and impair the ability of the Coffeyville Facility to compete with other nitrogen fertilizer producers who use natural gas as their primary feedstock, which, therefore, would have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.

The East Dubuque Facility uses natural gas as its primary feedstock, and as such, the profitability of operating the East Dubuque Facility is no assurance thatsignificantly dependent on the cost of natural gas. An increase in natural gas prices could make it less competitive with producers who do not use natural gas as their primary feedstock. In addition, an increase in natural gas prices in the U.S. relative to prices of natural gas paid by foreign nitrogen fertilizer producers may negatively affect our competitive position in the corn belt, and such changes could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We expect to purchase a portion of our natural gas for use in the East Dubuque Facility on the spot market. As a result, we wouldremain susceptible to fluctuations in the price of natural gas in general and in local markets in particular. We may use fixed supply, fixed price forward purchase contracts to lock in pricing for a portion of its natural gas requirements, but we may not be able to enter into such agreements on acceptable terms or at all. Without forward purchase pet cokecontracts for the supply of natural gas, we would need to purchase natural gas on comparable termsthe spot market, which would impair its ability to hedge exposure to risk from fluctuations in natural gas prices. If we enter into forward purchase contracts for natural gas, and natural gas prices decrease, then its cost of sales could be higher than it would have been in the absence of the forward purchase contracts.

Any interruption in the supply of natural gas to our East Dubuque Facility could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our East Dubuque Facility depends on the availability of natural gas. We have two agreements for pipeline transportation of natural gas with expiration dates in 2021 and 2022. We typically purchase natural gas from third parties on a spot basis and, from time to time, may enter into fixed-price forward purchase contracts.Upon expiration of the agreements, we may be unable to extend the service under the terms of the existing agreements or renew the agreements on satisfactory terms, or at all.all, necessitating construction of a new connection that could be costly and disruptive. Any disruption in the supply of natural gas to our East Dubuque Facility could restrict our ability to continue to make products at the facility and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

If licensed technology were no longer available, our business may be adversely affected.

We have licensed, and may in the future license, a combination of patent, trade secret, and other intellectual property rights of third parties for use in our plant operations. If our use of technology on which our operations rely were to be terminated or face infringement claims, licenses to alternative technology may not be available, or may only be available on terms that are not commercially reasonable or acceptable,or in the case of infringement, may result in substantial costs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Compliance with and changes in environmental laws and regulations, including those related to climate change, could require us to make substantial capital expenditures and adversely affect our performance.

Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the emission or discharge of pollutants into the environment, product use and specifications and the generation, treatment, storage, transportation, disposal and remediation of solid and hazardous wastes. Violations of applicable environmental laws and regulations, or of the conditions of permits issued thereunder, can result in
December 31, 2020 | 15


Table of Contents
substantial penalties, injunctive orders compelling installation of additional controls, civil and criminal sanctions, operating restrictions, injunctive relief, permit revocations and/or facility shutdowns, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our facilities and accordingly our financial performance.

In addition, new environmental laws and regulations, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, or increased governmental enforcement of laws and regulations could require us to make additional unforeseen expenditures. It is unclear the impact of the new federal administration will have on the laws and regulations applicable to us, however, measures to address climate change and reduce GHG emissions (including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxides) are in various phases of discussion or implementation and could affect our operations by requiring increased operating and capital costs and/or increasing taxes on GHG emissions. If we are unable to maintain sales of our products at a price that reflects such increased costs or have to increase the prices of our products because of such increased costs, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

End user demand for our products may also be adversely impacted by climate change legislation and other changes to or new interpretations of environmental laws, due to increased costs or application restrictions. From time to time, various state legislatures have proposed bans or other limitations on fertilizer products. Decreased demand for our products may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Our operations are dependent on third-party suppliers, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Operations of our Coffeyville Facility depend in large part on the performance of third-party suppliers, including the adjacent third-party air separation plant and a third-party electric service provider under a contract through June 30, 2029. Our East Dubuque Facility operations also depend in large part on the performance of third-party suppliers, including for the purchase of electricity, which we purchase under a utility service agreement that terminates on June 1, 2022 and will continue year-to-year thereafter unless either party provides 12-month advance written notice of termination. Should these, or any of our other third-party suppliers fail to perform in accordance with existing contractual arrangements, or should we lose the service of any third-party suppliers, our operations (or a portion thereof) could be forced to halt. Alternative sources of supply could be difficult to obtain. Any shutdown of our operations (or a portion thereof), even for a limited period, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.

We rely on third-party providers of transportation services and equipment, which subjects us to risks and uncertainties beyond our control and that may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make distributions.
We rely
Our business also relies on third-party railroad, trucking, and truckingbarge companies to ship finished products to customers of our Coffeyville Facility. We also lease railcars from railcar owners in order to ship our finished products. Additionally, although our customers generally pick up our products at our East Dubuque Facility, we occasionally rely on barge, truck and railroad companies to ship products to our customers. These transportation operations, equipment and services are subject to various hazards, including extreme weather conditions, work stoppages, delays, spills, derailments and other accidents, and other operating hazards. For example, barge transport can be impacted by lock closures resulting from inclement weather or surface conditions, including fog, rain, snow, wind, ice, strong currents, floods, droughts and other unplanned natural phenomena, lock malfunction, tow conditions and other conditions. Further, the limited number of towing companies and of barges available for finished productammonia transport may also impact the availability of transportation for our products.
These transportation operations, equipment and services are also subject to environmental, safety and other regulatory oversight. Due to concerns related to terrorism or accidents, local, state and federal governments could implement new regulations affecting the transportation of our finished products. In addition, new regulations could be implemented affecting the equipment used to ship our finished products.
Any delay in our ability to ship our finished products as a result of these transportation companies'companies’ failure to operate properly, the implementation of new and more stringent regulatory requirements affecting transportation operations or equipment, or significant increases in the cost of these services or equipment could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.


Our facilities face significant risks due to physical damage hazards, environmental liability risk exposure, and unplanned or emergency partial or total plant shutdowns resulting in business interruptions. We could incur potentially significant costs to the extent there are unforeseen events which cause property damage and a material decline in production which are not fully insured. Insurance companies that currently insure companies in our industry may limit or curtail coverage, may modify the coverage provided or may substantially increase premiums in the future.
Our operations are subject to significant operating hazards and interruptions. If our production plants or individual units within our plants, logistics assets, or key suppliers sustain a catastrophic loss and operations are shut down or significantly impaired, it would have a material adverse impact on our operations, financial condition and cash flows and adversely impact our ability to make cash distributions. Moreover, our Coffeyville Facility is located adjacent to CVR Refining's Coffeyville refinery, and a major accident or disaster at the refinery could adversely affect our operations at the Coffeyville Facility. Operations at our nitrogen fertilizer plants could be curtailed or partially or completely shut down, for an extended period of time as a result of unexpected circumstances, which may not be within our control, such as:
major unplanned maintenance requirements;
catastrophic events caused by mechanical breakdown, electrical injury, pressure vessel rupture, explosion, contamination, fire, or natural disasters, including flood, windstorm, etc.;
labor supply shortages, or labor difficulties that result in a work stoppage or slowdown;
cessation of all or a portion of the operations at one or both of our nitrogen fertilizer plants dictated by environmental authorities;
a disruption in the supply of pet coke to our Coffeyville Facility or natural gas to our East Dubuque Facility;
a governmental ban or other limitation on the use of nitrogen fertilizer products, either generally or specifically those manufactured at our nitrogen fertilizer plants; and
an event or incident involving a large clean-up, decontamination, or the imposition of laws and ordinances regulating the cost and schedule of demolition or reconstruction. Such regulatory oversight can cause significant delays in restoring property to its pre-loss condition.
We have sustained losses over the past ten-year period at our facilities, which are illustrative of the types of risks and hazards that exist. These losses or events resulted in costs assumed by us that were not fully insured due to policy retentions or applicable exclusions.
The magnitude of the effect on us of any shutdown will depend on the length of the shutdown and the extent of the plant operations affected by the shutdown. Our plants require scheduled maintenance turnarounds approximately every two to three years, which generally lasts two to four weeks.
Currently, we are insured under CVR Energy's casualty, environmental, property and business interruption insurance policies. The property and business interruption policies insure real and personal property, including property located at our facilities. There is a potential for a common occurrence to impact both the Coffeyville Facility and CVR Refining's Coffeyville refinery, in which case the insurance limitations would apply to all damages combined. These policies are subject to limits, sub-limits, retentions (financial and time-based) and deductibles. The application of these and other policy conditions could materially impact insurance recoveries, and potentially cause us to assume losses which could impair earnings.
The nitrogen fertilizer industry is highly capital intensive, and the entire or partial loss of facilities can result in significant costs to participants, such as us, and their insurance carriers. There are risks associated with the commercial insurance industry, reducing capacity, changing the scope of insurance coverage offered and substantially increasing premiums resulting from highly adverse loss experience or other financial circumstances. Factors that impact insurance cost and availability include, but are not limited to: industry wide losses, natural disasters, specific losses incurred by us, and low or inadequate investment returns earned by the insurance industry. If the supply of commercial insurance is curtailed due to highly adverse financial results, CVR Energy or we may not be able to continue our present limits of insurance coverage or obtain sufficient insurance capacity to adequately insure our risks for property damage or business interruption.

Deliberate, malicious acts, including terrorism, could damage our facilities, disrupt our operations or injure employees, contractors, customers or the public and result in liability to us.
Intentional acts of destruction could hinder our sales or production and disrupt our supply chain. Our facilities could be damaged or destroyed, reducing our operational production capacity and requiring us to repair or replace our facilities at substantial cost. Employees, contractors and the public could suffer substantial physical injury for which we could be liable. Governmental authorities may impose security or other requirements that could make our operations more difficult or costly. The consequences of any such actions could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and ability to make distributions.
Ammonia can be very volatile and extremely hazardous. Any liability for accidents involving ammonia or other products we produce or transport that cause severe damage to property or injury to the environment and human health could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions. In addition, the costs of transporting ammonia could increase significantly in the future.
We manufacture, process, store, handle, distribute
Our business manufactures, processes, stores, handles, distributes and transporttransports ammonia, which can be very volatile and extremely hazardous. Major accidents or releases involving ammonia could cause severe damage or injury to property, the environment and human health, as well as a possible disruption of supplies and markets. Such an event could result in civil lawsuits, fines, penalties and regulatory enforcement proceedings, all of which could lead to significant liabilities. Any damage or injury to persons, equipment, or property or other disruption of our ability to produce or distribute our products could result in a significant decrease in operating revenues and significant additional costcosts to replace or repair and insure our assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions. WeOur
December 31, 2020 | 16


Table of Contents
facilities periodically experience minor releases of ammonia related to leaks from our facilities’ equipment. Similar events may occur in the future.

In addition, we may incur significant losses or increased costs relating to the operation of our railcars used for the purpose of carrying various products, including ammonia. Due to the dangerous and potentially hazardous nature of the cargo, in particular ammonia, on board railcars, a railcar accident may result in fires, explosions, and pollution. These circumstances may result inreleases of material which could lead to sudden, severe damage or injury to property, the environment, and human health. In the event of pollution,contamination, under environmental law, we may be held responsible even if we are not at fault, and we complied with the laws and regulations in effect at the time of the accident. Litigation arising from accidents involving ammonia and other products we produce or transport may result in ourus being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting claims for large amounts ofsubstantial damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
Given the risks inherent in transporting ammonia, the costs of transporting ammonia could increase significantly in the future. Ammonia is most typically transported by pipeline and railcar. A number of initiatives are underway in the railroad and chemical industries that may result in changes to railcar design in order to minimize railway accidents involving hazardous materials. In addition, in the future, laws may more severely restrict or eliminate our ability to transport ammonia via railcar. If any railcar design changes are implemented, or if accidents involving hazardous freight increase the insurance and other costs of railcars, our freight costs could significantly increase.
Environmental laws and regulations could require us to make substantial capital expenditures to remain in compliance or to remediate current or future contamination that could give rise to material liabilities.
Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the emission or discharge of pollutants into the environment, product specifications and the generation, treatment, storage, transportation, disposal and remediation of solid and hazardous waste and materials. Violations of these laws and regulations or permit conditions can result in substantial penalties, injunctive orders compelling installation of additional controls, civil and criminal sanctions, permit revocations or facility shutdowns.
In addition, new environmental laws and regulations, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, increased governmental enforcement of laws and regulations or other developments could require us to make additional unforeseen expenditures. Many of these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly stringent, and the cost of compliance with these requirements can be expected to increase over time. The requirements to be met, as well as the technology and length of time available to meet those requirements, continue to develop and change. These expenditures or costs for environmental compliance could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
Our facilities operate under a number of federal and state permits, licenses and approvals with terms and conditions containing a significant number of prescriptive limits and performance standards in order to operate. Our facilities are also required to comply with prescriptive limits and meet performance standards specific to chemical facilities as well as to general manufacturing facilities. All of these permits, licenses, approvals, limits and standards require a significant amount of monitoring, record keeping and reporting in order to demonstrate compliance with the underlying permit, license, approval,

limit or standard. Incomplete documentation of compliance status may result in the imposition of fines, penalties and injunctive relief. Additionally, due to the nature of our manufacturing processes, there may be times when we are unable to meet the standards and terms and conditions of these permits and licenses due to operational upsets or malfunctions, which may lead to the imposition of fines and penalties or operating restrictions that may have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our facilities and accordingly our financial performance.
We could incur significant costcosts in cleaning up contamination at our nitrogen fertilizer plants and off-site locations.contamination.
Our business is subject to the occurrence of accidental
We handle hazardous substances which may result in spills, discharges or other releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Past or future spills related to or migrating from any of our nitrogen fertilizer plantscurrent or transportation of productsformer operations and solid or hazardous substances from our facilitieswaste disposal, may give rise to liability (including for personal injury, property damage, penalties, strict liability, or liability without fault, and potential cleanup responsibility) to governmental entities or private parties under federal, state or local environmental laws, as well as under common law. For example, we could be held strictly liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, CompensationCERCLA, and Liability Act ("CERCLA")similar state statutes, for past or future spills without regard to fault or whether our actions were in compliance with the law at the time of the spills. Pursuant to CERCLA and similar state statutes, we could be held liable forspills, including in connection with contamination associated with theour current and former facilities, we currently own and operate (whether or not such contamination occurred prior to our acquisition thereof), facilities we formerly owned or operated (if any) and facilities to which we transported or arranged for the transportation of wastes or byproducts containing hazardous substances for treatment, storage, or disposal.
The potential penalties and cleanup costs for past or future releases or spills, Such liability to third parties for damage to their property or exposure to hazardous substances, or the need to address newly discovered information or conditions that may require response actions could be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.flows and may not be covered by insurance.
In addition, we may incur liability for alleged personal injury or property damage due to exposure to chemicals or other hazardous substances located at or released from our facilities.
We may also face liability for personal injury, property damage, natural resource damage or for cleanup costs forhave assumed the alleged migration of contamination or other hazardous substances from our facilities to adjacentprevious owner’s responsibilities under certain administrative orders under the Resource Conservation and other nearby properties. We may also face legal actions or sanctions or incur costsRecovery Act (“RCRA”) related to contamination or noncompliancethat migrated from CVR Energy’s Coffeyville refinery onto the nitrogen fertilizer plant property while the previous owner owned and operated the properties. We continue to work with environmental laws at our facilities. In addition, limited subsurface investigation indicates the presence of certain contamination at the East Dubuque Facility and Coffeyville Facility. In the future, state or federalapplicable governmental authorities may require additional investigation or remediation or we may determine that there are conditions at these facilities that require remediation or other response.
We may incur future costs relating to the off-site disposal of hazardous wastes. Companies that dispose of, or arrange for the transportation or disposal of, hazardous substances at off-site locations may be held jointly and severally liable for the costs of investigation andimplement remediation of contamination at those off-site locations, regardless of fault. We could become involved in litigation or other proceedings involving off-site waste disposal and the damages or costs in any such proceedings could be material.these sites on a timely basis.

We may be unable to obtain or renew permits or approvals necessary for our operations, which could inhibit our ability to do business.
We hold
Our business holds numerous environmental and other governmental permits and approvals authorizing operations at our nitrogen fertilizer facilities. Expansionfacilities and future expansion of our operations is also predicated upon securing the necessary environmental or other permits or approvals.ability to secure approvals therefore. A decision by a government agency to deny or delay issuing a new or renewed material permit or approval, or to revoke or substantially modify an existing permit or approval, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue operations and on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions.flows.
Environmental laws and regulations on fertilizer end-use and application and numeric nutrient water quality criteria could have a material adverse impact on fertilizer demand in the future.
Future environmental laws and regulations on the end-use and application of fertilizers could cause changes in demand for our products. In addition, future environmental laws and regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, could limit our ability to market and sell our products to end users. From time to time, various state legislatures have proposed bans or other limitations on fertilizer products. The EPA is encouraging states to adopt state-wide numeric water quality criteria for total nitrogen and total phosphorus, which are present in our fertilizer products. A number of states have adopted or proposed numeric nutrient water quality criteria for nitrogen and phosphorus. The adoption of stringent state criteria for nitrogen and phosphorus could reduce the demand for nitrogen fertilizer products in those states. If such laws, rules, regulations or interpretations to significantly curb the end-use or application of fertilizers were promulgated in our marketing area, it could result in decreased demand for our products and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.

Climate change laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and ability to make cash distributions.
The EPA regulates GHG emissions (including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxides) under the authority granted to it under the Clean Air Act.
We monitor and report our annual GHG emissions from our nitrogen fertilizer plants. If our nitrogen fertilizer plants meet GHG emissions thresholds, they must obtain permits under the New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration ("PSD") and Title V programs of the federal Clean Air Act, then evaluate and implement "best available control technology" if they increase their GHG emissions by a significant amount.
The EPA has not yet proposed New Source Performance Standards ("NSPS") to regulate GHG emissions for the nitrogen fertilizer plants. Sources subject to NSPS are required to comply with emissions limits that reflect the best system of emissions reduction that the EPA has determined has been adequately demonstrated for that type of source. In 2015, the EPA promulgated NSPS for carbon dioxide emissions from electric utilities, although the EPA announced in April 2017 that those NSPS were under review and may be suspended, revised, or rescinded. Still, it is possible that the EPA will propose NSPS for our fertilizer plants, the timing of which is not known.
The current administration has sought to implement a new or modified policy with respect to climate change. For example, the administration announced its intention to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, though the earliest possible effective date of withdrawal for the United States is November 2020. If efforts to address climate change resume at the federal legislative level, this could mean Congressional passage of legislation adopting some form of federal mandatory GHG emission reduction, such as a nationwide cap-and-trade program. It is also possible that Congress may pass alternative climate change bills that do not mandate a nationwide cap-and-trade program and instead focus on promoting renewable energy and efficiency.
In addition to potential federal legislation, a number of states have adopted regional GHG initiatives to reduce carbon dioxide and other GHG emissions. In 2007, a group of Midwest states, including Kansas (where our Coffeyville Facility is located) and Illinois (where our East Dubuque Facility is located), formed the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord, which calls for the development of a cap-and-trade system to control GHG emissions and for the inventory of such emissions. However, the individual states that have signed on to the accord must adopt laws or regulations implementing the trading scheme before it becomes effective. To date, neither Kansas nor Illinois has taken meaningful action to implement the accord, and it is unclear whether either state intends to do so in the future.
Alternatively, the EPA may take further steps to regulate GHG emissions, although it is unclear to what extent the EPA will pursue climate change regulation. The implementation of EPA regulations and/or the passage of federal or state climate change legislation may result in increased costs to (i) operate and maintain our facilities, (ii) install new emission controls on our facilities and (iii) administer and manage any GHG emissions program. Increased costs associated with compliance with any future legislation or regulation of GHG emissions, if it occurs, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
In addition, climate change legislation and regulations may result in increased costs not only for our business but also for users of our fertilizer products, thereby potentially decreasing demand for our fertilizer products. Decreased demand for our fertilizer products may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
New regulations concerning the transportation, storage and handling of hazardous chemicals, risks of terrorism, and the security of chemical manufacturing facilities could result in higher operating and/or capital costs.
The costs of complying with future regulations relating to the transportation, storage and handling of hazardous chemicals and security associated with our nitrogen fertilizer facilities may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
Targets such as chemical manufacturing facilities may be at greater risk of future terrorist attacks than other targets in the United States. TheU.S. As a result, the chemical industry has responded to the issues that arose in response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 by starting new initiatives relating to the security of chemical industry facilities and the transportation of hazardous chemicals in the United States. Future terrorist attacks could lead to even stronger, more costly initiatives that could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions. The 2013 fertilizer plant explosion in West, Texas has generated consideration of more restrictive measures in the storage, handling and transportation of crop production materials, including fertilizers.

Due to our lack of asset diversification, adverse developments in the nitrogen fertilizer industry could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our common unitholders.
We rely exclusively on the revenues generated from our nitrogen fertilizer business. An adverse development in the nitrogen fertilizer industry would have a significantly greater impact on our operations and cash available for distribution to holders of common units than it would on other companies with a more diverse asset and product base. The largest publicly traded companies with which we compete sell a more varied range of fertilizer products.
Our business depends on significant customers,U.S., and the losscosts of significant customerscompliance therewith may have a material adverse effect on our resultsfinancial condition.

Our facilities face significant risks due to physical damage hazards, environmental liability risk exposure, and unplanned or emergency partial or total plant shutdowns which could cause property damage and a material decline in production which are not fully insured.

If any of our plants, logistics assets, or key suppliers sustain a catastrophic loss and operations are shutdown or significantly impaired, it would have a material adverse impact on our operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.flows.Operations at our plant could be curtailed, limited or completely shut down for an extended period of time as the result of one or more unforeseen events and circumstances, which may not be within our control, including: major unplanned maintenance requirements; catastrophic events caused by mechanical breakdown, electrical injury, pressure vessel rupture, explosion, contamination, fire, or natural disasters, including floods, windstorms, and other similar events; labor supply shortages or labor difficulties that result in a work stoppage or slowdown; cessation or suspension of a plant or specific operations dictated by
Our business has a high concentration of customers. In the aggregate, the top five customers represented 31% our net sales for the year ended
December 31, 2017. Our top customer on2020 | 17


Table of Contents
environmental authorities; acts of terrorism or other deliberate malicious acts; and an event or incident involving a consolidated basis accounted for approximately 11%large clean-up, decontamination, or the imposition of our net sales forlaws and ordinances regulating the year ended December 31, 2017. Given the naturecost and schedule of our business, and consistent with industry practice, we do not have long-term minimum purchase contracts with most of our agricultural customers. The loss ofdemolition or reconstruction, which can cause significant customers or a significant reductiondelays in purchase volume by these customers, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and abilityrestoring property to make cash distributions.its pre-event condition.
There can be no assurance that the transportation costs of our competitors will not decline.
Our nitrogen fertilizer plants are located within the U.S. farm belt, where the majority of the end users of our nitrogen fertilizers grow their crops. Many of our competitors produce fertilizer outside this region and incur greater costs in transporting their products over longer distances via rail, ships and pipelines. There can be no assurance that our competitors' transportation costs will not decline or that additional pipelines will not be built, lowering the price at which our competitors can sell their products, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
We are largely dependent oninsured under casualty, environmental, property and business interruption insurance policies. The property and business interruption policies insure our customersreal and personal property. These policies are subject to transport purchased goods fromlimits, sub-limits, retention (financial and time-based), and deductibles. There is potential for a common occurrence to impact both our East Dubuque Facility.
Historically, the customers of the East Dubuque Facility generally were located close to our East DubuqueCoffeyville Facility and have been willingCVR Energy’s Coffeyville refinery in which case the insurance limits and ableapplicable sub-limits would apply to transport purchased goods from the East Dubuque Facility. In most instances, those customers have purchased products for delivery at the East Dubuque Facilityall damages combined. The application of these and then arrangedother policy conditions could materially impact insurance recoveries and paid for the transport of thempotentially cause us to their final destinations by truck. However,assume losses which could impair earnings.

There is finite capacity in the future,commercial insurance industry engaged in underwriting energy industry risk, and there are risks associated with the transportation needscommercial insurance industry reducing capacity, changing the scope of those customers as well as their preferences may change,insurance coverage offered, and those customers may no longer be willingsubstantially increasing premiums, deductibles, or ableretainers, and/or waiting periods, resulting from highly adverse loss experience or other financial circumstances. Factors that impact insurance cost and availability include, but are not limited to: losses in our industry and other industries, natural disasters, specific losses incurred by us, and low or inadequate investment returns earned by the insurance industry. If the supply of commercial insurance is curtailed due to transport purchased goods from the East Dubuque Facility. In the event that our competitors are able to transport their products more efficiently or cost effectively than those customers, andhighly adverse financial results, we are unable to reallocate or provide alternative transportation resources that service our other facilities, those customers may reduce or cease purchases of our products. If this were to occur, we could be forced to make a substantial investment in a fleet of trucks and/or railcars to meet the delivery needs of those customers, which could be expensive and time consuming. We may not be able to continue our present limits of insurance coverage or obtain transportation capabilities on a timely basissufficient insurance capacity to adequately insure our risks for property damage or at all, and our inability to provide transportation for products could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.business interruption.

We are subject to strict laws and regulations regarding employee and process safety, and failure to comply with these laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.profitability.
Our facilities
We are subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act ("OSHA")OSHA and comparable state statutes that regulate the protection of the health and safety of workers. In addition, OSHAworkers, the proper design, operation, and certain environmental regulationsmaintenance of our equipment, and require that we maintainus to provide information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that we provide this information to employees and state and local governmental authorities.operations. Failure to comply with OSHAthese requirements including general industry standards, record keeping requirements and monitoring and control of occupational exposure to regulated substances,may result in significant fines or compliance costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions ifflows.

A significant portion of our workforce is unionized, and we are subjectedsubject to significant finesthe risk of labor disputes and adverse employee relations, which may disrupt our business and increase our costs.

As of December 31, 2020, approximately 33% of our employees were represented by labor unions under collective bargaining agreements. We may not be able to renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements when they expire on satisfactory terms or complianceat all. A failure to do so may increase our costs. In addition, our existing labor agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage at any of our facilities in the future, and any work stoppage could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Risks Related to Our Capital Structure

Instability and volatility in the global capital, credit, and commodity markets in the global economy could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions.flows.

Our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributionsresults of operations could be negatively impacted by difficult conditions and extreme volatility in the capital, credit, and commodities markets and in the global economy. For example:
Although we believe we will have sufficient liquidity under our debt facilities and instruments to run our business, under extreme market conditions there can be no assurance that such funds wouldunder our credit facilities will be available or

sufficient, and in such a case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms, or at all.
Marketall; market volatility could exert downward pressure on the price of our common units, which may make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital and thereby limit our ability to grow.
Our debt facilities and instruments contain various covenants that must be complied with, and if we are notgrow, which could in compliance, there can be no assurance that we would be ableturn cause our unit price to successfully amend the facilitiesdrop; or instruments in the future. Further, any such amendment may be expensive.
Market conditions could result in our significant customers experiencing financial difficulties. We are exposed to the credit risk of our customers, and their failuredifficulties may fail to meet their financial obligations when due because of bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other reasons could result in decreased sales and earnings for us.
Our acquisition and expansion strategy involves significant risks.
One of our business strategies is to pursue acquisitions and expansion projects. However, acquisitions and expansions involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including intense competition for suitable acquisition targets, the potential unavailability of financial resources necessary to consummate acquisitions and expansions, difficulties in identifying suitable acquisition targets and expansion projects or in completing any transactions identified on sufficiently favorable terms, and the need to obtain regulatory or other governmental approvals that may be necessary to complete acquisitions and expansions. In addition, any future acquisitions and expansions may entail significant transaction costs, tax consequences and risks associated with entry into new markets and lines of business.
In addition to the risks involved in identifying and completing acquisitions described above, even when acquisitions are completed, integration of acquired entities can involve significant difficulties, such as:
unforeseen difficulties in the acquired operations and disruption of the ongoing operations of our business;
failure to achieve cost savings or other financial or operating objectives with respect to an acquisition;
strain on the operational and managerial controls and procedures of our business, and the need to modify systems or to add management resources;
difficulties in the integration and retention of customers or personnel and the integration and effective deployment of operations or technologies;
assumption of unknown material liabilities or regulatory non-compliance issues;
amortization of acquired assets, which would reduce future reported earnings;
possible adverse short-term effects on our cash flows or operating results; and
diversion of management's attention from the ongoing operations of our business.
In addition, in connection with any potential acquisition or expansion project, we will need to consider whether the business we intend to acquire or expansion project we intend to pursue could affect our tax treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we are otherwise unable to conclude that the activities of the business being acquired or the expansion project would not affect our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we could seek a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). Seeking such a ruling could be costly or, in the case of competitive acquisitions, place us in a competitive disadvantage compared to other potential acquirers who do not seek such a ruling. If we are unable to conclude that an activity would not affect our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we could choose to acquire such business or develop such expansion project in a corporate subsidiary, which would subject the income related to such activity to entity-level taxation. See "— Tax Risks to Common Unitholders — Our tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and not being subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation. If the IRS were to treat us as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes or we become subject to entity-level taxation for state tax purposes, our cash available for distribution to our common unitholders would be substantially reduced, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our common units."
Failure to manage acquisition and expansion growth risks could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to consummate any acquisitions or expansions, successfully integrate acquired entities, or generate positive cash flow at any acquired company or expansion project.

A shortage of skilled labor, together with rising labor costs, could adversely affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our common unitholders.
Efficient production of nitrogen fertilizer using modern techniques and equipment requires skilled employees. Our facilities require special expertise to operate efficiently and effectively. To the extent that the services of our key technical personnel and skilled labor become unavailable to us for any reason, including as a result of the retirement of experienced employees from our aging work force, we would be required to hire other personnel. We may not be able to locate or employ such qualified personnel on acceptable terms or at all. We face competition for these professionals from our competitors, our customers and other companies operating in our industry. If we are unable to find qualified employees, or if the cost to find qualified employees increases materially, our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our common unitholders could be adversely affected.
A substantial portion of our East Dubuque workforce is unionized and we are subject to the risk of labor disputes and adverse employee relations, which may disrupt our business and increase our costs.
As of December 31, 2017, approximately 64% of the employees at the East Dubuque Facility were represented by the International Union of United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers under a collective bargaining agreement that expires in October 2019. We may not be able to renegotiate our collective bargaining agreement when it expires on satisfactory terms or at all. A failure to do so may increase our costs. In addition, our existing labor agreement or future agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage in the future, and any work stoppage could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
If licensed technology were no longer available, our business may be adversely affected.
We have licensed, and may in the future license, a combination of patent, trade secret and other intellectual property rights of third parties for use in our business. In particular, the gasification process we use at the Coffeyville Facility to convert pet coke to high purity hydrogen for subsequent conversion to ammonia is licensed from an affiliate of General Electric Company. The license, which is fully paid, grants us perpetual rights to use the pet coke gasification process on specified terms and conditions and is integral to the operations of our Coffeyville Facility. If this license, or any other license agreements on which our operations rely, were to be terminated, licenses to alternative technology may not be available, or may only be available on terms that are not commercially reasonable or acceptable. In addition, any substitution of new technology for currently-licensed technology may require substantial changes to manufacturing processes or equipment and may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.
We are subject to cybersecurity risks and other cyber incidents resulting in disruption. 
Threats to information technology systems associated with cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks continue to grow. We depend on information technology systems. In addition, we collect, process and retain sensitive and confidential customer information in the normal course of business. Despite the security measures we have in place and any additional measures we may implement in the future, our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, could be vulnerable to security breaches, computer viruses, lost or misplaced data, programming errors, human errors, acts of vandalism or other events. Any disruption of our systems or security breach or event resulting in the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, whether by us directly or our third-party service providers, could damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of litigation and liability, disrupt our business or otherwise affect our results of operations.
We may face third-party claims of intellectual property infringement, which if successful could result in significant costs for our business.
We may face claims of infringement that could interfere with our ability to use technology that is material to our business operations. Any litigation of this type related to third-party intellectual property rights could result in substantial costs to us and diversions of our resources, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions. In the event a claim of infringement against us is successful, we may be required to pay royalties or license fees for past or continued use of the infringing technology, or we may be prohibited from using the infringing technology altogether. If we are prohibited from using any technology as a result of such a claim, we may not be able to obtain licenses to alternative technology adequate to substitute for the technology we can no longer use, or licenses for such alternative technology may only be available on terms that are not commercially reasonable or acceptable to us. In addition, any substitution of new technology for currently licensed technology may require us to make substantial changes to our manufacturing processes or equipment or to our products, and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions.


Our level of indebtedness may affect our ability to operate our business and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We have incurred significant indebtedness, and we may be able to incur significant additional indebtedness in the future. If new indebtedness is added to our current indebtedness, the risks described below could increase. Our level of indebtedness could have important consequences, such as:
(i) limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our working capital needs, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions, or other purposes;
(ii) requiring us to utilize a significant portion of our cash flows to service our indebtedness, thereby reducing available cash and our ability to make distributions on
December 31, 2020 | 18


Table of Contents
our common units;
(iii) limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of ourthe business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of theseadditional funds to service debt;
(iv) limiting our ability to compete with other companies who are not as highly leveraged, as we may be less capable of responding to adverse economic and industry conditions;
restricting us from making strategic acquisitions, introducing new technologies (v) limiting our ability to make certain payments on debt that is subordinated or exploiting business opportunities;
secured on a junior basis; (vi) restricting the way in which we conduct our business because of financial and operating covenants, in the agreements governing our and our subsidiaries' existing and future indebtedness, including in the case of certain indebtedness of subsidiaries, certain covenants that restrictregarding the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributionsdistributions; (vii) limiting our ability to us;
enter into certain transactions with our affiliates; (viii) limiting our ability to designate our subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; (ix) exposing us to potential events of default (if not cured or waived) under financial and operating covenants contained in our or our subsidiaries'respective subsidiaries’ debt instruments that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditioninstruments; and operating results;
increasing our vulnerability to a downturn in general economic conditions or in pricing of our products; and
(x) limiting our ability to react to changing market conditions in our industry and in our customers' industries.conditions.
In addition to our debt service obligations, our operations require substantial investments on a continuing basis. Our ability to make scheduled debt payments, to refinance our obligations with respect to our indebtedness and to fund capital and non-capital expenditures necessary to maintain the condition of our operating assets, properties and systems software, as well as to provide capacity for the growth of our business, depends on our financial and operating performance, which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, competitive, legal and other factors.
In addition,Further, we are and will be subject to covenants contained in agreements governing our present and future indebtedness. These covenants include, and will likely include, restrictions on certain payments (including restrictions on distributions to our common unitholders), the granting of liens, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, dividend restrictions affecting subsidiaries, asset sales, transactions with affiliates, and mergers and consolidations. Any failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our current credit agreements or debt instruments or future credit agreements.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our debt obligations under our indebtedness that may not be successful.

Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations will depend upon, among other things:
things our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control; and
our future ability to obtain other financing.
We cannot offer any assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that we will be able to draw funds under theour ABL Credit Facility or otherwise,from other sources of financing, in an amount sufficient to fund our respective liquidity needs. In addition, our general partner's current policy is to distribute all available cash we generate on a quarterly basis, and the board of directors of our general partner may in the future elect to pay a special distribution, engage in unit repurchases or pursue other strategic options including acquisitions of other business or asset purchases, which would reduce cash available to service our debt obligations.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to service our indebtedness, we could face substantial liquidity problems and may be forced to reduce or suspend distributions, reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital, or restructure or refinance our

indebtedness, or seek bankruptcy protection. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service and other obligations. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. In addition,operations, and the terms of existing or future debt agreements may restrict us from adopting some of these alternatives. In the absence of such operating results

Further, our ABL Credit Facility bears interest at variable rates and resources,other debt we incur could face substantial liquidity problems and mightlikewise be required to dispose of material assets or operations, sell equity, and/or negotiate with our lenders to restructure the applicablevariable-rate debt. If market interest rates increase, variable-rate debt in order to meet ourwill create higher debt service and other obligations. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions for fair market value or at all. Market or business conditions may limitrequirements, which could adversely affect our ability to avail ourselves of some or all of these options. Furthermore, any proceeds that we could realize fromfund our liquidity needs, capital investments, and distributions to our unitholders. We may enter into agreements limiting our exposure to higher interest rates, but any such dispositionsagreements may not be adequate to meet our debt service obligations then due.offer complete protection from this risk.
Increases in interest rates could adversely impact our unit price
Mr. Carl C. Icahn exerts significant influence over the Partnership through his controlling ownership of CVR Energy, and his interests may conflict with the interests of the Partnership and our abilityunitholders.

Mr. Carl C. Icahn indirectly controls approximately 71% of the voting power of CVR Energy’s common stock and, by virtue of such ownership, is able to issue additional equity to make acquisitions, incurcontrol the Partnership through CVR Energy’s ownership of our general partner and its sole member, including: the election and appointment of directors; business strategy and policies; mergers or other business combinations; acquisition or disposition of assets; future issuances of common stock, common units, or other securities; incurrence of debt or forobtaining other purposes.
We cannot predict how interest rates will react to changing market conditions. Interest ratessources of financing; and the payment of distributions on our credit facilities, future credit facilities and debt securities wecommon units. The existence of a controlling stockholder may issue in debt offerings could be higher than current levels, causing our financing costshave the effect of making it difficult for, or may discourage or delay, a third-party from seeking to increase accordingly. Additionally, as with other yield-oriented securities, we expect that our unit price will be impacted by the levelacquire a majority of our quarterly cash distributions and implied distribution yield. The distribution yield is often used by investors to compare and rank related yield-oriented securities for investment decision-making purposes. Therefore, changes in interest rates may affect the yield requirements of investors who invest in our common units, which may adversely affect the market price of such common units.

Further, Mr. Icahn’s interests may not always be consistent with the Partnership’s interests or with the interests of our common unitholders. Mr. Icahn and a rising interest rate environment could have a material adverse impact on our unit price and our ability to issue additional equity to makeentities controlled by him may also pursue acquisitions or business opportunities in industries in which we compete, and there is no requirement that any additional business opportunities be presented to incur debtus. We also have and could increase ourmay in the future enter into transactions to purchase goods or services with affiliates of Mr. Icahn. To the extent that conflicts of interest costs.
Our debt agreements contain restrictions that will limit our flexibilitymay arise between us and Mr. Icahn and his affiliates, those conflicts may be resolved in operating our businessa manner adverse to us and our ability to make distributions to our common unitholders.

December 31, 2020 | 19


Table of Contents
Risks Related to Our debt facilities and instruments contain, andLimited Partnership Structure

We may not have sufficient “available cash” to pay any instruments governing future indebtedness of ours would likely contain, a number of covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictionsquarterly distribution on us, including restrictions on our and our subsidiaries' ability to, among other things:
incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred units;
pay distributions in respect of ourcommon units or make other restricted payments;
make certain payments on debt that is subordinated or secured on a junior basis;
make certain investments;
sell certain assets;
create liens on certain assets;
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantiallythe Board may elect to distribute less than all of our assets;available cash.
enter into certain transactions with our affiliates; and
designate our subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries.
Any of these restrictions could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions and could otherwise restrict partnership activities. Any failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our debt facilities and instruments. Upon a default, unless waived, the lenders under our debt facilities and instruments would have all remedies available to a secured lender, and could elect to terminate their commitments, cease making further loans, institute foreclosure proceedings against our assets, and force us into bankruptcy or liquidation, subject to any applicable intercreditor agreements. In addition, a default under our debt facilities and instruments would trigger a cross default under our other agreements and could trigger a cross default under the agreements governing our future indebtedness. Our operating results may not be sufficient to service our indebtedness or to fund our other expenditures and we may not be able to obtain financing to meet these requirements.
Despite our indebtedness, we may still be able to incur significantly more debt, including secured indebtedness. This could intensify the risks described above.
We may be able to incur substantially more debt in the future, including secured indebtedness. Although our debt facilities and instruments contain restrictions on our incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions and, under certain circumstances, indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions

could be substantial. Also, these restrictions may not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness. To the extent such new debt or new obligations are added to our existing indebtedness, the risks described above could substantially increase.
We are a holding company and depend upon our subsidiaries for our cash flow.
We are a holding company. All of our operations are conducted and all of our assets are owned by our subsidiaries. Consequently, our cash flow and our ability to meet our obligations or to make cash distributions in the future will depend upon the cash flow of our subsidiaries and the payment of funds by our subsidiaries to us in the form of dividends or otherwise. The ability of our subsidiaries to make any payments to us will depend on its earnings, the terms of its indebtedness, including the terms of any debt facilities and instruments, and legal restrictions. In particular, future debt facilities and instruments incurred at our subsidiaries may impose significant limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us and consequently our ability to make distributions to our common unitholders.
Our relationship with CVR Energy and CVR Refining and their financial condition subjects us to potential risks that are beyond our control.
Due to our relationship with CVR Energy and CVR Refining, adverse developments or announcements concerning CVR Energy or CVR Refining could materially adversely affect our financial condition, even if we have not suffered any similar development. The ratings assigned to CVR Refining's indebtedness are below investment grade. Downgradescurrent policy of the credit ratings of CVR Refining could increase our cost of capital and collateral requirements, and could impede our access to the capital markets.
The credit and business risk profiles of CVR Energy and CVR Refining may be factors considered in credit evaluations of us. This is because we rely on CVR Energy and CVR Refining for various services, including management services and the supply of pet coke. The credit and risk profile of CVR Energy and CVR Refining could adversely affect our credit ratings and risk profile, which could increase our borrowing costs or hinder our ability to raise capital.
Our credit rating may be adversely affected by the leverage of CVR Refining, as credit rating agencies may consider the leverage and credit profile of CVR Energy and its affiliates because of their ownership interest in and joint control of us and the strong operational links between CVR Refining's refining business and us. Any adverse effect on our credit rating would increase our cost of borrowing or hinder our ability to raise financing in the capital markets, which would impair our ability to grow our business and make cash distributions to common unitholders.
Risks Inherent in Our Limited Partnership Structure and Our Common Units
The board of directors of our general partner has in place a policy to distribute an amount equal to the available cash we generate each quarter, which could limit our ability to grow and make acquisitions.
Our general partner's current policy(“Board”) is to distribute an amount equal to the available cash we generategenerated by our business each quarter to our common unitholders. As a result of its cash distribution policy, we will likely need to rely primarily upon external financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity securities, to fund our acquisitions and expansion capital expenditures.expenditures, and our growth, if any, may not be as robust as that of businesses that reinvest available cash to expand ongoing operations. We may not have sufficient available cash each quarter to enable the payment of distributions to common unitholders. Furthermore, the partnership agreement does not require us to pay distributions on a quarterly basis or otherwise. As such, to the extent we are unable to finance growth externally, our cash distribution policy will significantly impair our ability to grow. The board of directors of the general partnerBoard may modify or revoke ourits cash distribution policy at any time at its discretion, including in such a manner that would result in an elimination of cash distributions regardless of the amount of available cash we generate. Our Partnership Agreement does not require us to make any distributions.our business generates.
In addition, because of our distribution policy, our growth, if any, may not be as robust as that of businesses that reinvest their available cash to expand ongoing operations.
To the extent we issue additional units in connection with any acquisitions or expansion capital expenditures or as in-kind distributions, current common unitholders willwould experience dilution and the payment of distributions on those additional units willmay decrease the amount we distribute on eachin respect of its outstanding unit. There are no limitations inunits. Under our partnership agreement, on our abilitywe are authorized to issue an unlimited number of additional interests without a vote of the common unitholders. The issuance by us of additional common units includingor other equity interests of equal or senior rank would reduce the proportionate ownership interest of common unitholders immediately prior to the issuance. As a result of the issuance of common units, rankingthe following may occur: the amount of cash distributions on each common unit may decrease; the ratio of our taxable income to distributions may increase; the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding common unit will be diminished; and the market price of the common units may decline. In addition, our partnership agreement does not prohibit the issuance by our subsidiaries of equity interests, which may effectively rank senior to the outstanding common units. The incurrence of additional commercial borrowings or other debt to finance ourits growth strategy would result in increased interest expense, which, in turn, would reduce the available cash that we have to distribute to unitholders.

Our partnership agreement has limited our general partner’s liability, replaces default fiduciary duties, and restricts the remedies available to common unitholders for actions that, without these limitations and reductions, might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.

As permitted under Delaware law, our partnership agreement, which applies to and binds common unitholders, limits the liability and replaces the fiduciary duties of our general partner, while also restricting the remedies available to our common unitholders.
We rely onunitholders for actions that, without these limitations and reductions, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty. The partnership agreement contains provisions that replace the executive officersstandards to which our general partner would otherwise be held by state fiduciary duty law. For example: (i) the partnership agreement permits our general partner to make a number of CVR Energydecisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to manage certain aspectsits capacity as general partner, which entitles our general partner to consider only the interests and factors that it desires and means that it has no duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting, any limited partner; (ii) the partnership agreement provides that our business and affairs pursuantgeneral partner will not have any liability to a servicesunitholders for decisions made in its capacity as general partner so long as it acted in good faith, meaning it believed the decision was in our best interest; (iii) the partnership agreement which CVR Energy can terminate at any time.
Our future performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of CVR Energy's senior management team. We have entered into a services agreement withprovides that our general partner and CVR Energy whereby CVR Energy has agreed to provide us with the servicesofficers and directors of its senior management team as well as accounting, legal, financegeneral partner will not be liable for monetary damages to common unitholders, including us, for any acts or omissions unless there has been a final and other key

back-office and mid-office personnel. CVR Energy can terminate this agreement at any time, subject tonon-appealable judgment entered by a 180-day notice period. The losscourt of competent jurisdiction determining that the general partner or unavailability to usits officers or directors acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct, or in the case of any member of CVR Energy's senior management team could negatively affect our ability to operate our business and pursue our business strategies. We do not have employment agreementsa criminal matter, acted with any of CVR Energy's officers and we do not maintain any key person insurance. In addition, CVR Energy may not continue to provide us the officersknowledge that are necessary for the conduct was criminal; (iv) the partnership agreement generally provides that affiliated transactions and resolutions of our business or such provision mayconflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee of the board of directors of its general partner and not involving a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties or be “fair and reasonable” to us, as determined by its general partner in good faith, and that, are acceptable. If CVR Energy elected to terminatein determining whether a transaction or resolution is “fair and reasonable,” the service agreement on 180 days' notice, we might not be able to find qualified individuals to serve as our executive officers within such 180-day period.
In addition, pursuant togeneral partner may consider the services agreement we are responsible for a portiontotality of the compensation expense of such executive officers according torelationships between the percentage of time such executive officers spend working for us. However, the compensation of such executive officers is set by CVR Energy, and we have no control over the amount paid to such officers. The services agreement does not contain any cap on the amounts weparties involved, including other transactions that may be requiredparticularly advantageous or beneficial to pay CVR Energy pursuant to this agreement.affiliated parties, including us; and (v) the partnership agreement provides that in resolving conflicts of interest, it will be presumed that in making its decision, the general partner or its conflicts committee acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any holder of common units, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption.

December 31, 2020 | 20


Table of Contents
Our general partner, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Energy, has fiduciary duties to CVR Energy and its stockholders, and the interests of CVR Energy and its stockholders may differ significantly from, or conflict with, the interests of our public common unitholders.

Our general partner is responsible for managing us. Although our general partner has fiduciary duties to manage us in a manner that is in our best interests, the fiduciary duties are specifically limited by the express terms of our partnership agreement, and the directors and officers of our general partner also have fiduciary duties to manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to CVR Energy and its stockholders. The interests of CVR Energy and its stockholders may differ from, or conflict with, the interests of our public common unitholders. In resolving these conflicts, our general partner may favor its own interests, the interests of CRLLC,CVR Services, its sole member, or the interests of CVR Energy and holders of CVR Energy'sEnergy’s common stock, including its majority stockholder, an affiliate of Icahn Enterprises L.P., over our interests and those of our common unitholders.unitholders..

The potential conflicts of interest include, among others, the following:
Neither (i) neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement requires the owners of our general partner, including CVR Energy, to pursue a business strategy that favors us. Theus and the affiliates of our general partner, including CVR Energy, have fiduciary duties to make decisions in their own best interests and in the best interest of holders of CVR Energy'sEnergy’s common stock, which may be contrary to our interests. In addition,interests (ii) our general partner is allowed to take into account the interests of parties other than us or our common unitholders, such as its owners or CVR Energy, in resolving conflicts of interest, which has the effect of limiting its fiduciary duty to our common unitholders.
Ourunitholders; (iii) our general partner has limited its liability and reduced its fiduciary duties under our partnership agreement and has also restricted the remedies available to our common unitholders for actions that, without the limitations, mightconstitute breaches of fiduciary duty. As a result of purchasing common units, common unitholders consent to some actions and conflicts of interest that might otherwise constitute a breach of fiduciary or other duties under applicable state law.
The board of directors of our general partnerduty; (iv) the Board determines the amount and timing of asset purchases and sales, capital expenditures, borrowings, repayment of indebtedness, and issuances of additional partnership interests, each of which can affect the amount of cash that is available for distribution to our common unitholders.
Ourunitholders; (v) our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services rendered to us or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf. Therebehalf and there is no limitation on the amounts our general partnerthat can cause us to pay it or its affiliates.
Ourbe paid; (vi) our general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed to us by it and its affiliates. In addition, our general partneraffiliates, and decides whether to retain separate counsel or others to perform services for us.
Ourus; (vii) our general partner determines which costs incurred by it and its affiliates are reimbursable by us.
Certainus; and (viii) certain of the executive officers of our general partner also serve as executive officers of CVR Energy, andincluding our executive chairman, is the chief executive officer of CVR Energy. The executive officers who work for both CVR Energy and our general partner, including our chief financial officer and general counsel, divide their time between our business and the business of CVR Energy. These executive officers will face conflicts of interest from time to time inwhen making decisions which may benefit either us or CVR Energy.

Our partnership agreement limits Additionally, the liability and replaces the fiduciary dutiescompensation of our general partner and restricts the remedies available to us and our common unitholders for actions takensuch executive officers is set by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.
Our partnership agreement limits the liability and replaces the fiduciary duties of our general partner, while also restricting the remedies available to our common unitholders for actions that, without these limitations and reductions, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty. Delaware partnership law permits such contractual reductions of fiduciary duty. By purchasing common units, common unitholders consent to some actions that might otherwise constitute a breach of fiduciary or other duties applicable under state law. Our partnership agreement contains provisions that replace the standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held by state fiduciary duty law. For example:
Our partnership agreement permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to its capacity as general partner. This entitles our general partner to consider only the interests and factors that it desires, and it has no duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting, us or our common unitholders. Decisions made by our general partner in its individual capacity are made by CRLLC as the sole member of our general partner, and not by the board of directors of our general partner. Examples include the exercise of the general partner's call right, its voting rights with respect to any common units it may own, its registration rights and its determination whether or not to consent to any merger or consolidation or amendment to our partnership agreement.
Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will not have any liability to us or our common unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as general partner so long as it acted in good faith, meaning it believed that the decisions were in our best interests.
Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner and the officers and directors of our general partner will not be liable for monetary damages to us for any acts or omissions unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that our general partner or those persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with knowledge that such person's conduct was criminal.
Our partnership agreement generally provides that affiliate transactions and resolutions of conflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general partner and not involving a vote of common unitholders must be on terms no less favorable to us than those generally provided to or available from unrelated third parties or be "fair and reasonable." In determining whether a transaction or resolution is "fair and reasonable," our general partner may consider the totality of the relationship between the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly advantageous or beneficial to us.
By purchasing a common unit, a common unitholder becomes bound by the provisions of our partnership agreement, including the provisions described above.
CVR Energy, hasand we have no control over the poweramount paid to appoint and remove our general partner's directors.such officers.

CVR Energy has the power to elect all of the members of the board of directors of our general partner.Board. Our general partner has control over all decisions related to our operations. Our public common unitholders do not have an ability to influence any operating decisions and will not be able to prevent us from entering into any transactions. Furthermore, the goals and objectivesCertain subsidiaries of CVR Energy as the indirect ownerperform certain corporate services for us, including finance, accounting, legal, information technology, auditing, and cash management activities, and we could be impacted by any failure of our general partner, may not be consistent with those of our public common unitholders.entities to adequately perform these services.
Common units are subject to our general partner's call right.
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more than 80% of the common units, our general partner will have the right, which it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, but not the obligation, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the common units held by public common unitholders at a price not less than their then-current market price, as calculated pursuant to the terms of our partnership agreement. As a result, each holder of our common units may be required to sell such holder'sholder���s common units at an undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on investment. A common unitholderinvestment, and may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of its common units. Our general partner is not obligated to obtain a fairness opinion regarding the value of the common units to be repurchased by it upon exercise of the call right. There is no restriction in our partnership agreement that prevents our general partner from issuing additional common units and then exercising its call right. Our general partner may use its own discretion, free of fiduciary duty restrictions, in determining whether to exercise this right.right..


Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest in us to a third-party, including in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of our common unitholders. The new equity owner of our general partner would then be in a position to replace the board of directors and the officers of our general partner with its own choices and to influence their decisions. If control of our general partner were transferred to an unrelated third-party, the new owner would have no interest in CVR Energy and CVR Energy could, upon 90 days’ notice, terminate the services agreement pursuant to which it provides us with the services of its senior management team.

December 31, 2020 | 21


Table of Contents
As a publicly traded partnership we qualify for certain exemptions from many of the NYSE’s corporate governance requirements.

As a publicly traded partnership, we qualify for certain exemptions from the NYSE’s corporate governance requirements, which include the requirements that (i) a majority of the Board consist of independent directors and (ii) the Board have a nominating/corporate governance committee and compensation committee that are composed entirely of independent directors. Our general partner’s board of directors has not and does not currently intend to establish a nominating/corporate governance committee and we could avail ourselves of the additional exemptions available to publicly traded partnerships at any time in the future. Accordingly, common unitholders do not have the same protections afforded to equity holders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.

Our public common unitholders have limited voting rights and are not entitled to elect our general partner or our general partner'spartner’s directors and do not have sufficient voting power to remove our general partner without CVR Energy'sEnergy’s consent.

Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, our common unitholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business and, therefore, limited ability to influence management's decisions regarding our business. Common unitholders have no right to elect our general partner or our general partner's board of directors on an annual or other continuing basis. The board of directors of our general partner, includingmanagement’s decisions. Our common unit holders do not choose the independent directors, is chosen entirely by CVR Energy as the indirect ownerMembers of the general partner and not by our common unitholders. Unlike publicly traded corporations, weBoard do not hold annual meetings of our common unitholders to elect directors or conductparticipate in other matters routinely conducted at annual meetings of stockholders. Furthermore, even if our common unitholders are dissatisfied with the performance of our general partner, theystockholders, and have no practical ability to remove our general partner.partner without the consent of CVR Energy. As a result of these limitations, the price at which the common units will trade could be diminished.
As of the date of this Report, CVR Energy indirectly owns approximately 34% of our common units, which means holders of common units other than CVR Energy will not be able to remove the general partner, under any circumstances, unless CVR Energy sells some of the common units that it owns or we sell additional units to the public, in either case, such that CVR Energy owns less than 33 1/3% of our common units.
Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of commonunitholders owning 20% or more of our common units (other than our general partner and its affiliates and permitted transferees).
Our partnership agreement restricts common unitholders'unitholders’ voting rights by providing that any units held by a person that owns 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, other than our general partner, its affiliates, their transferees, and persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the board of directors of our general partner,Board, may not vote on any matter. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of common unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the ability of our common unitholdersand to influence the manner or direction of management.
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its affiliates will reduce cash available for distribution to our commonunitholders.
Prior to making any distribution on our outstanding units, we will reimburse our general partner for all expenses it incurs on our behalf including, without limitation, our pro rata portion of management compensation and overhead charged by CVR Energy in accordance with our services agreement. The services agreement does not contain any cap on the amount we may be required to pay pursuant to this agreement. The payment of these amounts, including allocated overhead, to our general partner and its affiliates could adversely affect our ability to make distributions to the holders of our common units.
Common unitholders may have liability to repay distributions.

In the event that: (i) we make distributions to our common unitholders when our nonrecourse liabilities exceed the sum of (a) the fair market value of our assets not subject to recourse liability and (b) the excess of the fair market value of our assets subject to recourse liability over such liability, or a distribution causes such a result, and (ii) a common unitholder knows at the time of the distribution of such circumstances, such common unitholder will be liable for a period of three years from the time of the impermissible distribution to repay the distribution under Section 17-607 of the Delaware Act.
Likewise, upon the winding up of the partnership, in the event that (a)(i) we do not distribute assets in the following order: (i)(a) to creditors in satisfaction of their liabilities; (ii)(b) to partners and former partners in satisfaction of liabilities for distributions owed under our partnership agreement; (iii)(c) to partners for the return of their contribution; and finally (iv)(d) to the partners in the proportions in which the partners share in distributionsdistributions; and (b)(ii) a common unitholder knows at the time of such circumstances, then such common unitholder will be liable for a period of three years from the impermissible distribution to repay the distribution under Section 17-807 of the Delaware Act.
Our general partner's interest in us and the control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without commonunitholder consent.
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest in us to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of our common unitholders. Furthermore, there is no restriction in our partnership agreement on the ability of CVR Energy to transfer its equity interest in our general partner to a third party. The new equity owner of our general partner would then be in a position to replace the board of directors and the officers of our general partner with its own choices and to influence the decisions taken by the board of directors and officers of our general partner.

If control of our general partner were transferred to an unrelated third party, the new owner of the general partner would have no interest in CVR Energy. We rely on the senior management team of CVR Energy and are party to a services agreement pursuant to which CVR Energy provides us with the services of its senior management team. If our general partner were no longer controlled by CVR Energy, CVR Energy could be more likely to terminate the services agreement, which it may do upon 180 days' notice.
Mr. Carl C. Icahn exerts significant influence over the Partnership and his interests may conflict with the interests of the Partnership's public commonunitholders.
CVR Energy indirectly owns our general partner and approximately 34% of our common units. Subject to any contractual commitments that may exist from time to time, CVR Energy has the right to appoint and replace all of the members of the board of directors of our general partner at any time.
Mr. Carl C. Icahn indirectly controls approximately 82% of the voting power of CVR Energy's capital stock and, by virtue of such stock ownership in CVR Energy, is able to elect and appoint all of the directors of CVR Energy. This gives Mr. Icahn the ability to control and exert substantial influence over CVR Energy. As a result of such control of CVR Energy, he is able to control several aspects of the Partnership, including (subject to the limitations set forth in the partnership agreement):
business strategy and policies;
mergers or other business combinations;
the acquisition or disposition of assets;
future issuances of common units or other securities;
incurrence of debt or obtaining other sources of financing; and
the Partnership's distribution policy and the payment of distributions on the Partnership's common units.
CVR Energy provides us with the services of its senior management team as well as accounting, legal, finance and other key back-office and mid-office personnel pursuant to a services agreement which it can terminate at any time subject to a 180-day notice period. We cannot predict whether CVR Energy will terminate the services agreement and, if so, what the economic effect of termination would be. CVR Energy also has the right under our partnership agreement to sell our general partner at any time to a third party, who would be able to replace our entire board of directors. Finally, CVR Energy's current owners are under no obligation to maintain their ownership interest in us, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Mr. Icahn's interests may not always be consistent with the Partnership's interests or with the interests of the Partnership's public common unitholders. Mr. Icahn and entities controlled by him may also pursue acquisitions or business opportunities in industries in which we compete, and there is no requirement that any additional business opportunities be presented to us. We also have and may in the future enter into transactions to purchase goods or services with affiliates of Mr. Icahn. To the extent that conflicts of interest may arise between the Partnership and Mr. Icahn and his affiliates, those conflicts may be resolved in a manner adverse to the Partnership or its public common unitholders.
We may issue additional common units and other equity interests without the approval of our common unitholders, which would dilute the existing ownership interests of our commonunitholders.
Under our partnership agreement, we are authorized to issue an unlimited number of additional interests without a vote of the common unitholders. The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity interests of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:
the proportionate ownership interest of common unitholders immediately prior to the issuance will decrease;
the amount of cash distributions on each common unit will decrease;
the ratio of our taxable income to distributions may increase;
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding common unit will be diminished; and
the market price of the common units may decline.
In addition, our partnership agreement does not prohibit the issuance by our subsidiaries of equity interests, which may effectively rank senior to the common units.

Units eligible for future sale may cause the price of our common units to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common units in the public market, or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the market price of our common units to decline. This could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity interests.
As of February 20, 2018, there were 113,282,973 common units outstanding. Of this amount: (i) CVR Energy, through CRLLC, owns approximately 34% of the common units, which may be sold pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-211044) described below or an exemption from registration such as Rule 144; (ii) affiliates of GSO Capital Partners LP ("GSO") own a number of common units, and certain of those common units may be sold pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-211044) described below or an exemption from registration such as Rule 144; and (iii) the remaining common units are held by the public and are freely transferable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), to the extent held by persons other than "affiliates," as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
Under our partnership agreement, our general partner and its affiliates (including CRLLC) have the right to cause us to register their units under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. We are also party to registration rights agreements pursuant to which we may be required to register the sale of certain common units held by CRLLC and GSO.
The Partnership's registration statement on Form S-3, declared effective by the SEC on May 13, 2016, enables CRLLC and GSO to sell, from time to time, in one or more public offerings or direct placements, certain common units each currently owns.
As a publicly traded partnership we qualify for certain exemptions from the NYSE's corporate governance requirements.
As a publicly traded partnership, we qualify for certain exemptions from the NYSE's corporate governance requirements, including:
the requirement that a majority of the board of directors of our general partner consist of independent directors;
the requirement that the board of directors of our general partner have a nominating/corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors; and
the requirement that the board of directors of our general partner have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors.
Our general partner's board of directors has not and does not currently intend to establish a nominating/corporate governance committee. Additionally, we could avail ourselves of the additional exemptions available to publicly traded partnerships listed above at any time in the future. Accordingly, common unitholders do not have the same protections afforded to equityholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.
CVR Energy and its affiliates may compete with us.
CVR Energy and its affiliates are permitted to compete with us, including by developing or acquiring additional fertilizer assets both directly and through its controlled affiliates. In keeping with the terms of our partnership agreement, the doctrine of corporate opportunity or any analogous doctrine, does not apply to our general partner or any of its affiliates, including CVR Energy and its executive officers and directors. Therefore, any such person or entity that becomes aware of a potential transaction, agreement, arrangement or other matter that may be an opportunity for us will not have any duty to communicate or offer such opportunity to us. For example, this could permit CVR Energy to elect to develop new fertilizer assets or acquire third-party fertilizer assets itself or through its controlled affiliates. Any such person or entity will not be liable to us or any of our limited partners for breach of any fiduciary duty or other duty (other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing) by reason of the fact that such person or entity pursues or acquired such opportunity for itself, directs such opportunity to another person or entity or does not communicate such opportunity or information to us. This may create actual and potential conflicts of interest between us and affiliates of our general partner and result in less than favorable treatment of us and our common unitholders.
In addition, we are party to an omnibus agreement with CVR Energy and our general partner. We and CVR Energy have agreed that CVR Energy will have a preferential right to acquire any assets or group of assets that do not constitute assets used in a fertilizer restricted business. In determining whether to exercise any preferential right under the omnibus agreement, CVR Energy will be permitted to act in its sole discretion, without any fiduciary obligation to us or our common unitholders whatsoever. These obligations will continue so long as CVR Energy directly or indirectly owns at least 50% of our general partner.


Tax Risks Related to Common Unitholders
Our tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and not being subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation.
If the IRS were to treat us as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes or we become subject to entity-level taxation for state tax purposes, our cash available for distribution to our commonunitholders would be substantially reduced, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.

The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in our common units depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Despite the fact that we are organized as a limited partnership under Delaware law, we would be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless we satisfy a “qualifying income” requirement. Based upon our current operations, we believe we satisfy the qualifying income requirement. Although we have received favorable private letter rulings from the IRS with respect to certain of our operations, no ruling has been or will be requested regarding our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Failing to meet the qualifying income requirement or a change in current law (which could be retroactive) could cause us to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject us to taxation as an entity.
If we were treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would pay U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate tax rate. Distributionsrate and distributions to our common unitholders would generally be taxed again as corporate distributions, and no income, gains, losses, or deductions would flow through to our common unitholders. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a corporation, our cash available for distribution to our common unitholders would be substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as a corporation wouldreduced and result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to our common unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.
At the state level, several states have been evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level taxation through the imposition of
December 31, 2020 | 22


Table of Contents
state income, franchise, or other forms of taxation. We currently own assets and conduct business in several states, many of which impose a margin or franchise tax. In the future, we may expand our operations. Imposition of a similar tax on us in other jurisdictions that we may expand to could substantially reduce our cash available for distribution to our common unitholders.
The tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships or an investment in our common units could be subject to potential legislative, judicial or administrative changes or differing interpretations, possibly applied on a retroactive basis.
The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of publicly traded partnerships, including us, or an investment in our common units may be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial changes or differing interpretations at any time. From time to time, members of Congress propose and consider substantive changes to the existing U.S. federal income tax laws that affect publicly traded partnerships. Although there is no current legislative proposal, a prior legislative proposal would have eliminated the qualifying income exception to the treatment of all publicly traded partnerships as corporations upon which we rely for our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In addition, on January 24, 2017, final regulations regarding which activities give rise to qualifying income within the meaning of Section 7704 of the Code (the "Final Regulations") were published in the Federal Register. The Final Regulations are effective as of January 19, 2017, and apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 19, 2017. We do not believe the Final Regulations affect our ability to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, there are no assurances that the Final Regulations will not be revised to take a position that is contrary to our interpretation of the current law.
Any modification to the U.S. federal income tax laws may be applied retroactively and could make it more difficult or impossible for us to meet the exception for certain publicly traded partnerships to be treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We are unable to predict whether any of these changes or other proposals will ultimately be adopted or enacted. Any similar or future legislative or administrative changes could negatively impact the value of an investment in our common units. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the status of regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on your investment in our common units.
If the IRS were to contest the U.S. federal income tax positions we take, it may adversely impact the market for our common units, and the costs of any such contest would reduce our cash available for distribution to our commonunitholders.
We have not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The IRS may adopt positions that differ from the positions we take. It may be necessary to resort to administrative or

court proceedings to sustain some or all of the positions we take. A court may not agree with some or all of the positions we take. Any contest with the IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for our common units and the price at which they trade. Moreover, the costs of any contest between us and the IRS will result in a reduction in our cash available for distribution to our common unitholders and thus will be borne indirectly by our common unitholders.
If the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, it (and some states) may assess and collect any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments directly from us, in which case our cash available for distribution to our common unitholders might be substantially reduced and our current and former common unitholders may be required to indemnify us for any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments that were paid on such common unitholders'unitholders’ behalf.
Pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, for
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, if the IRS makes audit adjustments to our income tax returns, it (and some states) may assess and collect anyfrom us taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments directly from us. To the extent possible under the new rules,to our income tax returns. Our general partner may elect to either pay the taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) directly to the IRS or, if we are eligible, issue a revised information statement to each common unitholder and former common unitholder with respect to an audited and adjusted return. Although our general partner may elect to have our common unitholders and former common unitholders take such audit adjustment into account and pay any resulting taxes (including applicable penalties or interest) in accordance with their interests in us during the tax year under audit, thereThere can be no assurance that such an election to allocate the audit adjustment and tax payment obligation to our current and former common unitholders will be practical, permissible, or effective in all circumstances. As a result, our current common unitholders may bear some or all of the tax liability resulting from such audit adjustment, even if such common unitholdersthey did not own common units in us during the tax year under audit. If, as a result of any such audit adjustment, we are required to make payments of taxes, penalties, and interest, our cash available for distribution to our common unitholders might be substantially reduced and our current and former unitholders may be required to indemnify us for any taxes (including any applicable penalties and interest) resulting from such audit adjustments that were paid on such unitholders behalf. These rules

Our unitholders are not applicable for tax years beginning on or prior to December 31, 2017.
Even if commonunitholders do not receive any cash distributions from us, unitholders will be required to pay income taxes on their share of our taxable income including theireven if they do not receive any cash distributions from us.

A unitholder’s allocable share of our taxable income fromwill be taxable to it, which may require the cancellation of debt.
Our common unitholders are requiredunitholder to pay any U.S. federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income taxes, on their share of our taxable income, whethereven if the unitholder receives no cash distributions or not they receive cash distributions from us.us that are less than the actual tax liability that results from that income. For example, if we sell assets and use the proceeds to repay existing debt or fund capital expenditures, you may be allocated taxable income and gain resulting from the sale, and our cash available for distribution would not increase. Similarly, taking advantage of opportunities to reduce our existing debt, such as debt exchanges, debt repurchases, or modifications of our existing debt could result in “cancellation of indebtedness income” being allocated to our common unitholders as taxable income without any increase in our cash available for distribution. Our common unitholders may not receive cash distributions from us equal to their share of our taxable income or even equal to the actual tax liability that results from that income.
Tax gain or loss on the disposition of our common units could be more or less than expected.
If a common unitholder sells common units, the common unitholder will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized and that common unitholder's tax basis in those common units. Because distributions in excess of a common unitholder's allocable share of our net taxable income decrease such common unitholder's tax basis in its common units, the amount, if any, of such prior excess distributions with respect to the common units a common unitholder sells will, in effect, become taxable income to a common unitholder if it sells such common units at a price greater than its tax basis in those common units, even if the price such common unitholder receives is less than its original cost for such common units. In addition, because the amount realized includes a common unitholder’s share of our nonrecourse liabilities, if a common unitholder sells its common units, a common unitholder may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash received from the sale.
A substantial portion of the amount realized from a common unitholder's sale of our common units, whether or not representing gain, may be taxed as ordinary income to such common unitholder due to potential recapture items, including depreciation recapture. Thus, a common unitholder may recognize both ordinary income and capital loss from the sale of common units if the amount realized on a sale of such common units is less than such common unitholder’s adjusted basis in the common units.  Net capital loss may only offset capital gains and, in the case of individuals, up to $3,000 of ordinary income per year.  In the taxable period in which a common unitholder sells its common units, such common unitholder may recognize ordinary income from our allocations of income and gain to such common unitholder prior to the sale and from recapture items that generally cannot be offset by any capital loss recognized upon the sale of common units.

Commonunitholders may be subject to limitation on their ability to deduct interest expense incurred by us.

In general, we are entitled to a deduction for interest paid or accrued on indebtedness properly allocable to our trade or business during our taxable year. However, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, our deduction for “business interest” is limited to the sum of our business interest income and 30% of our “adjusted taxable income.” For the purposes of this limitation, our adjusted taxable income is computed without regard to any business interest expense or business interest income, and in the case of taxable years beginning before January 1, 2022, any deduction allowable for depreciation, amortization, or depletion.
Tax-exempt entities face unique tax issues from owning our common units that may result in adverse tax consequences
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relieve and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was signed into law. The CARES Act, among other things, increased the limitation on the deductibility of business interest to them.
Investment in our common units by tax-exempt entities, such as employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs), raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all50% of our income allocated to organizations that are exempt from U.S. federal income tax, including IRAs and other retirement plans, will be unrelated businessadjusted taxable income and will befor partnerships in taxable to them. Further, with respect to taxable years beginning afteryear December 31, 2017, a tax-exempt entity with more than one unrelated trade or business (including by attribution from investment in a partnership such as ours that is engaged in one or more unrelated trade or business) is required2020. The CARES Act also allows taxpayers to elect to compute the unrelatedlimitation on business interest expense for taxable income of such tax-exempt entity separately with respect to each such trade or business (including for purposes of determining any net operating loss deduction). As a result, for years beginning afteryear December 31, 2017, it may not be possible for tax-exempt entities to utilize losses from an investment in our partnership to offset unrelated business2020 by using its adjusted taxable income from another unrelated trade or business and vice versa. Tax-exempt entities should consult a tax advisor before investing in our common units.taxable year December 31, 2019.

Non-U.S. Common Unitholderscommon unitholders will be subject to U.S. taxes and withholding with respect to their income and gain from owning our common units.

Non-U.S. common unitholders are generally taxed and subject to income tax filing requirements by the United States on income effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business (“effectively connected income”). Income allocated to our common unitholders and any gain from the sale of our common units will generally be considered to be “effectively connected” with a U.S. trade or business. As a result, distributions to a Non-U.S. common unitholder will be subject to withholding at the highest applicable effective tax rate, and a Non-U.S. common unitholder who sells or otherwise disposes of a common unit will also be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the gain realized from the sale or disposition of that common unit.

December 31, 2020 | 23


Table of Contents
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act imposes a withholding obligation of 10% of the amount realized upon a Non-U.S. common unitholder’switholder’s sale or exchange of an interest in a partnership that is engaged in a U.S. trade or business. However, due to challenges of administering a withholding obligation applicable to open market trading and other complications, the IRS has temporarily suspended the application of this withholding rule to open market transfers of interest in publicly traded partnerships pending promulgation of regulations or other guidance that resolves the challenges.  It is not clear if or when such regulations or other guidance will be issued.business, effective January 1, 2022 per final Regulations. Non-U.S. common unitholders should consult a tax advisor before investing in our common units.
We treat
Tax-exempt entities face unique tax issues from owning our common units that may result in adverse tax consequences.

Investment in our common units by tax-exempt entities, such as employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts, raises unique issues. For example, virtually all of our income allocated to organizations that are exempt from U.S. federal income tax will be unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable. Further, with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, a tax-exempt entity with more than one unrelated trade or business (including by attribution from investment in a partnership such as ours that is engaged in one or more unrelated trade or business) is required to compute the unrelated business taxable income of such tax-exempt entity separately with respect to each such trade or business (including for purposes of determining any net operating loss deduction). As a result, for years beginning after December 31, 2017, it may not be possible for tax-exempt entities to utilize losses from an investment in our partnership to offset unrelated business taxable income from another unrelated trade or business and vice versa.

The IRS may challenge our treatment of each purchaser of our common units as having the same tax benefits without regard to the common units actually purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment,purchased, which could adversely affect the value of our common units.

Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common units, we have adopted certain methods for allocating depreciation and amortization deductions that may not conform to all aspects of existing Treasury Regulations. A successful IRS challenge to the use of these methods could adversely affect the amount of tax benefits available to our common unitholders. It also could affect the timing of these tax benefits or the amount of gain from any sale of common units and could have a negative impact on the value of our common units or result in audit adjustments to a common unitholder'sunitholder’s tax returns.

Our proration methods may be challenged by the IRS, which could change the allocation of items of income, gain, loss, and deduction among our common unitholders.

We generally (i) prorate our items of income, gain, loss, and deduction between transferors and transferees of our common units each month based upon the ownership of our common units on the first day of each month, instead of on the basis of the date a particular unit is transferred. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could change the allocation of items of income, gain, lossunits; and deduction among our commonunitholders.
We generally prorate our items of income, gain, loss and deduction between transferors and transferees of our common units each month based upon the ownership of our units on the first day of each month (the "Allocation Date"), instead of on the basis of the date a particular common unit is transferred. Similarly, we generally(ii) allocate certain deductions for depreciation of capital additions, gain or loss realized on a sale or other disposition of our assets, and, in the discretion of the general partner, any other extraordinary item of income, gain, loss, or deduction, each month based upon the ownership of our units on the Allocation Date.first day of each month (the “Allocation Date”), instead of on the basis of the date a particular common unit is transferred. Treasury Regulations allow a similar monthly simplifying convention, but such regulations do not specifically authorize all aspects of

our proration method. If the IRS were to challenge our proration method, we may be required to change the allocation of items of income, gain, loss, and deduction among our common unitholders.

IRS challenge of certain valuation methodologies we have adopted to determine a unitholder’s allocations of income, gain, loss, and deduction, could adversely affect the value of our common units.

In determining the items of income, gain, loss, and deduction allocable to our unitholders, we must routinely determine the fair market value of our assets and allocate any unrealized gain or loss attributable to our assets to the capital accounts of our unitholders. The IRS may challenge our valuation methods and allocations. A common unitholder whose common units aresuccessful IRS challenge to these methods or allocations could adversely affect the subjectamount of a securities loan (e.g., a loantaxable income or loss being allocated to a "short seller" to cover a shortour unitholders, the amount of taxable gain from our unitholders’ sale of common units) may be considered to have disposedunits, and the value of those common units. If so, such common unitholder would no longer be treated for tax purposes as a partner with respect to thosethe common units duringor result in audit adjustments to our unitholders’ tax returns without the periodbenefit of the loan and may recognize gain or loss from the disposition.additional deductions.
Because there are no specific rules governing the U.S. federal income tax consequence of loaning a partnership interest, a common unitholder whose common units are the subject of a securities loan may be considered to have disposed of the loaned common units. In that case, the common unitholder may no longer be treated for tax purposes as a partner with respect to those common units during the period of the loan to the short seller and the common unitholder may recognize gain or loss from such disposition. Moreover, during the period of the loan, any of our income, gain, loss or deduction with respect to those common units may not be reportable by the common unitholder and any cash distributions received by the common unitholder as to those common units could be fully taxable as ordinary income. Common unitholders desiring to assure their status as partners and avoid the risk of gain recognition from a securities loan are urged to consult a tax advisor to determine whether it is advisable to modify any applicable brokerage account agreements to prohibit their brokers from borrowing their common units.
Our common unitholders will likely be subject to state and local taxes, andas well as income tax return filing requirements, in jurisdictions where they do not live as a result of investing in our common units.

In addition to U.S. federal income taxes, our common unitholders may be subject to other taxes, including foreign, state, and local taxes, unincorporated business taxes, and estate, inheritance, or intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions in which we conduct business or own property now or in the future, even if they do not live in any of those jurisdictions. Our common unitholdersjurisdictions, will likely be required to file foreign, state, and local income tax returns and pay state and local income taxes in some or all of these various jurisdictions. Further, our common unitholdersjurisdictions, and may be subject to penalties for failure to comply with those requirements.
We currently own
December 31, 2020 | 24


Table of Contents
General Risks Related to the Partnership

The acquisition and expansion strategy of our business involves significant risks that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

From time to time, we may consider pursuing acquisitions and expansion projects (“Expansion Projects”) to continue to grow and increase profitability. However, we may not be able to consummate such Expansion Projects due to intense competition for suitable acquisition targets; the potential unavailability of financial resources necessary; difficulties in identifying suitable Expansion Projects or in completing them on sufficiently favorable terms; and the failure to obtain requisite regulatory approvals. In addition, any Expansion Projects may entail significant transaction costs and risks associated with entry into new markets and lines of business, including but not limited to, new regulatory obligations and risks.

In the case of an acquisition, integration of acquired entities can involve significant difficulties, such as: disruption of the ongoing operations; failure to achieve cost savings or other financial or operating objectives contributing to the accretive nature of an acquisition; strain on operational and managerial controls, procedures and management; difficulties in the integration and retention of customers or personnel; assumption of unknown material liabilities or regulatory non-compliance issues; amortization of acquired assets, and/which would reduce future reported earnings; and possible adverse short-term effects on our cash flows or conductoperating results.

When considering potential Expansion Projects, will also consider impact on our tax treatment as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. If we are unable to conclude that the activities of the Expansion Project would not affect our treatment as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, we may elect to seek a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Seeking such a ruling could be costly or, in the case of competitive acquisitions, place the business in Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Texas. Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and Oklahoma currently impose a personalcompetitive disadvantage compared to other potential acquirers who do not seek such a ruling. If we are unable to conclude that an activity would not affect our treatment as a partnership for federal income tax on individuals. Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraskapurposes and Oklahoma also imposeare unable or unwilling to obtain an IRS ruling, we may choose to acquire such business or develop such expansion project in a corporate subsidiary, which would subject the income tax on corporationsrelated to such activity to entity-level taxation, which would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our common unitholders and could likely cause a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.

Internally generated cash flows and other entities. Illinois imposessources of liquidity may not be adequate for our capital needs.

Our business is capital intensive and working capital needs may vary significantly over relatively short periods of time. For instance, nitrogen fertilizer demand volatility can significantly impact working capital on a replacement tax on corporationsweek-to-week and other entities,month-to-month basis. If we cannot generate adequate cash flow or otherwise secure sufficient liquidity to meet our working capital needs or support our short-term and Texas imposes a franchise tax on corporations and other entities. Common unitholders are likely required to file state and local income tax returns and pay state and local income taxes in some or all of these various jurisdictions. Further, common unitholderslong-term capital requirements, we may be subjectunable to penalties for failure tomeet our debt obligations, pursue our business strategies, or comply with those requirements. As we make acquisitions or expandcertain environmental standards, which would have a material adverse effect on our business we may own or control assets or conduct business in additional states or foreign jurisdictions that impose a personal income tax. It is our common unitholders' responsibility to file all United States federal, foreign, state, and local income tax returns.results of operations.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.    Properties
Our Coffeyville Facility is
Refer to Item 1, “Facilities” for more information on a 60-acre site located in Coffeyville, Kansas. Our East Dubuque Facility is on a 210-acre site in East Dubuque, Illinois adjacent to the Mississippi River.
Ourour core business properties. CVR Energy also leases property for our executive and marketing offices are located at 2277 Plaza Drive in Sugar Land, Texas and our administrative office is located in Kansas City, Kansas. The offices in Sugar Land and Kansas, City are leased by a subsidiary of CVR Energy and we pay a pro rata share of the rent on those offices. We believe that our owned facilities, together with CVR Energy's leased facilities, will be sufficient for our needs over the next twelve months.respectively.
We are party to a cross-easement agreement with CVR Refining so that both we and CVR Refining are able to access and utilize each other's land in Coffeyville, Kansas in certain circumstances in order to operate our respective businesses in a manner to provide flexibility for both parties to develop their respective properties, without depriving either party of the benefits associated with the continuous reasonable use of the other party's property. For more information on this cross-easement agreement, see Part III, Item 13 of this Report "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence — Agreements with CVR Energy and CVR Refining — Real Estate Transactions."
We also utilize two separate UAN storage tanks and related truck and railcar load-out facilities. Each of these storage facilities, located in Phillipsburg and Dartmouth, Kansas, has a UAN storage tank that has a capacity of approximately

10,000 tons. The Phillipsburg property that the terminal was constructed on is owned by a subsidiary of CVR Refining, which operates the terminal. The Dartmouth terminal is located on leased property owned by the Pawnee County Cooperative Association, which operates the terminal.
Item 3.    Legal Proceedings
We are, and will continue to be, subject to litigation from time to time in
In the ordinary course of business, we may become party to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, and governmental investigations, including environmental, regulatory, and other matters. Large, and sometimes unspecified, damages or penalties may be sought from us in some matters and certain matters may require years to resolve. Although we cannot provide assurance, we believe that an adverse resolution of the matters described below would not have a material impact on our business, including matters such as those described under "Business — Environmental Matters." We also incorporate by reference into this Part I, Item 3liquidity, consolidated financial position, or consolidated results of this Report, the information regarding the lawsuits and proceedings described and referenced inoperations. Refer to Note 13 ("Commitments and Contingencies"2 (“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”) to our Consolidated Financial Statements as set forth, Loss Contingencies, in Part II, Item 8 for further discussion on current litigation matters.

December 31, 2020 | 25


Table of this Report. In accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), we record a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations or claims asserted against us, we do not believe that any currently pending legal proceeding or proceedings to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.Contents
Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.


December 31, 2020 | 26


Table of Contents
PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant'sFor Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Performance Graph

The performance graph below compares the cumulative total return of the Partnership’s common units to (a) the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Composite Index and (b) a composite peer group (“Peer Group”) consisting of The Mosaic Company, CF Industries Holdings, Inc., Intrepid Potash, Inc., and Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in common units and each index was $100 on December 31, 2015 and that all distributions were reinvested. Investment is weighted on the basis of market capitalization.
cvi-20201231_g3.jpg
The unit price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. Information used in the graph was obtained from Yahoo! Finance (finance.yahoo.com). The performance graph above is furnished and not filed for purposes of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. The performance graph is not soliciting material subject to Regulation 14A.

Market Information
Our
CVR Partners’ common units are listed on the NYSE under the symbol "UAN"“UAN” on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The table below sets forth, for the quarter indicated, the high and low sales prices per unit of our common units for our two most recent fiscal years:
2017:High Low
First Quarter$6.95
 $4.30
Second Quarter5.08
 3.38
Third Quarter4.08
 2.58
Fourth Quarter4.01
 2.94

2016:High Low
First Quarter$8.84
 $4.77
Second Quarter9.75
 7.03
Third Quarter8.41
 4.99
Fourth Quarter6.37
 4.05
There were 42Partnership has 32 holders of record of our commonthe outstanding units as of February 20, 2018. Because manyDecember 31, 2020.

December 31, 2020 | 27


Table of our common units are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of holders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial owners represented by these record holders.Contents
Cash Distribution Policy
For a discussion of the Partnership's cash distribution policy and for a summary of cash distributions paid to unitholders, refer to Note 7 ("Partners’ Capital and Partnership Distributions") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report.
Because our policy is to distribute all available cash we generate each quarter, our unitholders have direct exposure to fluctuations in the amount of earnings generated by our business. We expect that the amount of our quarterly distributions, if any, will vary based on our earnings during each quarter. Our quarterly cash distributions, if any, will not be stable and will vary from quarter to quarter as a direct result of variations in our operating performance and earnings caused by fluctuations in the price of nitrogen fertilizers, among other factors. See Part I, Item 1 of this Report "Business — Distribution, Sales and Marketing" and "— Seasonality." Such variations may be significant. The board of directors of our general partner may change the foregoing distribution policy at any time and from time to time. The partnership agreement does not require us to pay cash distributions on a quarterly or other basis.
The ABL Credit Facility and the indenture governing the 2023 Notes may limit our ability to pay distributions to unitholders. See Note 10 ("Debt") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report for a discussion of these limitations.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
There were no repurchases
Repurchases of ourthe Partnership’s common units by the issuer during the fiscal quarterthree months ended December 31, 2017.2020 were as follows:
PeriodTotal Number of Units PurchasedAverage Price paid per UnitTotal Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or ProgramsApproximate Dollar Value of Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
October 1 to October 31, 2020— $— — $7,723,222 
November 1 to November 30, 2020 (2)60,000 8.32 60,000 7,223,883 
December 1 to December 31, 2020333,777 12.88 333,777 2,924,400 
Total393,777 393,777 

(1)On May 6, 2020, the Board, on behalf of the Partnership, authorized the Partnership to repurchase up to $10 million of the Partnership’s common units. Repurchases may be made through open market transactions, block trades, privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise in accordance with applicable securities laws. Through December 31, 2020, the Partnership has repurchased $7.1 million of its common units under this authorization and $2.9 million of authority may yet be used to purchase common units.
(2)On November 23, 2020, a 10-to-1 reverse common unit split occurred. From November 1, 2020 through November 23, 2020, the Partnership repurchased 416,000 common units. The units summarized above reflect common unit repurchases on a split-adjusted basis. No changes to the unit repurchase authorization occurred during the period as a result of the reverse split.

Equity Compensation Plan

The CVR Partners Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) provides for the grant of options, unit appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, restricted units, phantom units and other unit-based awards, each in respect of common units. Individuals who are eligible to receive awards under the CVR Partners LTIP include employees, officers, consultants and directors of CVR Partners and the general partner and their respective subsidiaries and parents. A maximum of 500,000 common units are issuable under the CVR Partners LTIP.

The table below contains information about securities authorized for issuance under the CVR Partners LTIP as of December 31, 2020.
Plan CategoryNumber of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and RightsWeighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsNumber of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:    
CVR Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan— — 482,022 (1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:  
None— — —  
Total— — 482,022  

(1)Represents units that remain available for future issuance pursuant to the CVR Partners LTIP in connection with awards of options, unit appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, restricted units, and phantom units.

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data
This data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Report.
The selected consolidated financial information presented below under the captions "Consolidated Statements of Operations Data" and "Cash Flow Data" for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and the selected consolidated financial information presented below under the caption "Balance Sheet Data" as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report, which financial statements have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. The selected consolidated financial information presented below under the captions "Consolidated Statements of Operations Data" and "Cash Flow Data" for the

years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the selected consolidated financial information at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 presented below under the caption "Balance Sheet Data" is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Report.
The following schedules show our selected financial and operating data for the periods indicated, which are derived from our consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial information presented below includes the East Dubuque Facility for the post-acquisition period beginning April 1, 2016. For a discussion of the East Dubuque Merger, refer to Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report.
Our consolidated financial statements include certain costs of CVR Energy that were incurred on our behalf. These costs, which are reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses and direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization), are billed to us pursuant to a services agreement that is a related party transaction. The amounts charged or allocated to us are not necessarily indicative of the costs that we would have incurred had we operated as a stand-alone entity for all periods presented.

Not applicable.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
          
 (in millions, except per unit data and as otherwise indicated)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:         
Net sales$330.8
 $356.3
 $289.2
 $298.7
 $323.7
          
Cost of materials and other – Affiliates7.5
 2.6
 6.7
 9.4
 10.8
Cost of materials and other – Third parties77.4
 91.1
 58.5
 62.6
 47.3
 84.9
 93.7
 65.2
 72.0
 58.1
Direct operating expenses – Affiliates (1)3.9
 4.2
 4.1
 3.0
 4.1
Direct operating expenses – Third parties (1)151.6
 144.1
 102.0
 95.9
 90.0
 155.5
 148.3
 106.1
 98.9
 94.1
Depreciation and amortization74.0
 58.2
 28.4
 27.3
 25.6
Cost of sales314.4
 300.2
 199.7
 198.2
 177.8
          
Selling, general and administrative expenses – Affiliates (2)15.6
 15.0
 14.0
 13.4
 16.0
Selling, general and administrative expenses – Third parties (2)10.0
 14.3
 6.8
 4.3
 5.0
 25.6
 29.3
 20.8
 17.7
 21.0
Operating income (loss)(9.2) 26.8
 68.7
 82.8
 124.9
Interest expense and other financing costs(62.9) (48.6) (7.0) (6.7) (6.3)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (4.9) 
 
 
Other income (expense), net(0.5) 0.1
 0.3
 
 0.1
Income (loss) before income tax expense(72.6) (26.6) 62.0
 76.1
 118.7
Income tax expense0.2
 0.3
 
 
 0.1
Net income (loss)$(72.8) $(26.9) $62.0
 $76.1
 $118.6
          
Net income (loss) per common unit – basic$(0.64) $(0.26) $0.85
 $1.04
 $1.62
Net income (loss) per common unit – diluted$(0.64) $(0.26) $0.85
 $1.04
 $1.62
          
Available cash for distribution (3)*$(9.7) $48.6
 $81.0
 $102.0
 $145.2
          
Weighted-average common units outstanding (in thousands):
Basic113,283
 103,299
 73,123
 73,115
 73,072
Diluted113,283
 103,299
 73,131
 73,139
 73,228

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
          
 (in millions)
Reconciliation to net sales:         
Fertilizer sales net at gate$290.0
 $309.0
 $248.8
 $259.3
 $281.5
Freight in revenue32.8
 33.0
 27.2
 27.5
 30.2
Hydrogen revenue0.4
 3.2
 11.8
 10.1
 11.4
Other, including the impact of purchase accounting7.6
 11.1
 1.4
 1.8
 0.6
Total net sales$330.8
 $356.3
 $289.2
 $298.7
 $323.7
* See footnote (3) below for discussion of non-GAAP financial measures.

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
          
 (in millions)
Balance Sheet Data:         
Cash and cash equivalents$49.2
 $55.6
 $50.0
 $79.9
 $85.1
Working capital (4)62.8
 71.5
 72.7
 89.1
 107.6
Total assets (4)1,234.3
 1,312.2
 536.3
 577.8
 591.7
Total debt, net of current portion (4)625.9
 623.1
 124.8
 124.0
 123.2
Total partners' capital549.9
 624.9
 385.6
 413.9
 439.9

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
          
 (in millions)
Cash Flow Data:         
Net cash flow provided by (used in):         
Operating activities$10.4
 $45.0
 $78.4
 $118.9
 $129.0
Investing activities(14.5) (87.1) (16.9) (21.0) (43.7)
Financing activities(2.3) 47.7
 (91.4) (103.1) (128.0)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$(6.4) $5.6
 $(29.9) $(5.2) $(42.7)
          
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment$14.5
 $23.2
 $17.0
 $21.1
 $43.8



 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Key Operating Statistics:         
Consolidated sales (thousand tons):         
Ammonia286.1
 201.4
 32.3
 24.4
 40.5
UAN1,254.5
 1,237.5
 939.5
 951.0
 904.6
Consolidated product pricing at gate (dollars per ton) (5):         
Ammonia$280
 $376
 $521
 $518
 $643
UAN$152
 $177
 $247
 $259
 $282
Consolidated production volume (thousand tons):         
Ammonia (gross produced) (6)814.7
 693.5
 385.4
 388.9
 402.0
Ammonia (net available for sale) (6)267.8
 183.6
 37.3
 28.3
 37.9
UAN1,268.4
 1,192.6
 928.6
 963.7
 930.6
          
Feedstock:         
Petroleum coke used in production (thousand tons)487.5
 513.7
 469.9
 489.7
 487.0
Petroleum coke used in production (dollars per ton)$17
 $15
 $25
 $28
 $30
Natural gas used in production (thousands of MMBtu) (7)7,619.5
 5,596.0
 
 
 
Natural gas used in production (dollars per MMBtu) (7) (8)$3.24
 $2.96
 $
 $
 $
Natural gas in cost of materials and other (thousands of MMBtu) (7)8,051.5
 4,618.7
 
 
 
Natural gas in cost of materials and other (dollars per MMBtu) (7) (8)$3.26
 $2.87
 $
 $
 $
          
Coffeyville Facility on-stream factors (9):         
Gasification98.5% 96.9% 90.2% 96.8% 95.6%
Ammonia97.4% 94.9% 87.5% 92.6% 94.4%
UAN91.7% 93.1% 87.3% 92.0% 91.9%
East Dubuque Facility on-stream factors (9):         
Ammonia90.4% 87.7% % % %
UAN90.3% 87.3% % % %
          
Market Indicators:         
Ammonia – Southern plains (dollars per ton)$314
 $356
 $510
 $539
 $581
Ammonia – Corn belt (dollars per ton)$358
 $416
 $566
 $601
 $641
UAN – Corn belt (dollars per ton)$192
 $208
 $284
 $314
 $337
Natural gas NYMEX (dollars per MMbtu)$3.02
 $2.55
 $2.63
 $4.26
 $3.73

(1)Direct operating expenses are shown exclusive of depreciation and amortization.
(2)The Partnership incurred approximately $3.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of legal and other professional fees and other merger-related expenses, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Refer to Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report for further discussion of the East Dubuque Merger.

(3)The board of directors of our general partner has a policy to calculate available cash for distribution starting with Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (net income before interest expense, net, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization) further adjusted for the impact of non-cash share-based compensation, and, when applicable, major scheduled turnaround expenses, gain or loss on extinguishment of debt, loss on disposition of assets, expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger and business interruption insurance recovery. Available cash for distribution equaled our Adjusted EBITDA reduced for cash needed for (i) net cash interest expense (excluding capitalized interest) and debt service and other contractual obligations; (ii) maintenance capital expenditures; and (iii) to the extent applicable, major scheduled turnaround expenses, reserves for future operating or capital needs that the board of directors of the general partner deems necessary or appropriate, and expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger, if any. Available cash for distribution may be increased by the release of previously established cash reserves, if any, at the discretion of the board of directors of our general partner, and available cash is increased by the business interruption insurance proceeds and the impact of purchase accounting. Actual distributions are set by the board of directors of our general partner. The board of directors of our general partner may modify our cash distribution policy at any time, and our partnership agreement does not require us to make distributions at all.
Available cash for distribution is not a recognized term under GAAP. Available cash for distribution should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income (loss) or operating income, or any other measure of financial performance or operating performance. In addition, available cash for distribution is not presented as, and should not be considered, an alternative to cash flows from operations or as a measure of liquidity. Available cash for distribution as reported by the Partnership may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other entities, thereby limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
(4)
Balances as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 have been retrospectively adjusted for Accounting Standard Update No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs," which requires that costs incurred to issue debt be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying value of the debt.
(5)Product pricing at gate represents net sales less freight revenue divided by product sales volume in tons, and is shown in order to provide a pricing measure that is comparable across the fertilizer industry.
(6)Gross tons produced for ammonia represent the total ammonia produced, including ammonia produced that was upgraded into other fertilizer products. Net tons available for sale represent the ammonia available for sale that was not upgraded into other fertilizer products.
(7)The feedstock natural gas shown above does not include natural gas used for fuel. The cost of fuel natural gas is included in direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization).
(8)The cost per MMBtu excludes derivative activity, when applicable. The impact of natural gas derivative activity during the periods presented was not material.
(9)On-stream factor is the total number of hours operated divided by the total number of hours in the reporting period and is included as a measure of operating efficiency.
Coffeyville Facility
The Linde air separation unit experienced a shut down and following the Linde outage, the Coffeyville Facility UAN unit experienced a number of operational challenges, resulting in approximately 11 days of UAN downtime during the year ended December 31, 2017. Excluding the impact2020 | 28


Table of the Linde air separation unit outage at the Coffeyville Facility, the UAN unit on-stream factors at the Coffeyville Facility would have been 94.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017.Contents
Excluding the impact of the full facility turnaround and the Linde air separation unit outages at the Coffeyville Facility, the on-stream factors for the year ended December 31, 2015 would have been 99.9% for gasifier, 97.7% for ammonia and 97.6% for UAN.
Excluding the impact of the downtime associated with the installation of the waste heat boiler, the pressure swing adsorption unit upgrade and the Linde air separation unit maintenance at the Coffeyville Facility, the on-stream factors for the year ended December 31, 2014 would have been 98.2% for gasifier, 94.3% for ammonia and 93.7% for UAN.
Excluding the impact of the planned downtime associated with the replacement of the damaged catalyst, the unplanned Linde air separation unit outages, the UAN expansion coming online and the unplanned downtime associated with weather issues at the Coffeyville Facility, the on-stream factors for the year ended December 31, 2013 would have been 99.5% for gasifier, 98.9% for ammonia and 98.0% for UAN.

East Dubuque Facility
Excluding the impact of the full facility turnaround at the East Dubuque Facility, the on-stream factors at the East Dubuque Facility would have been 94.2% for ammonia and 94.0% for UAN for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Excluding the impact of the full facility turnaround at the East Dubuque Facility, the on-stream factors at the East Dubuque Facility would have been 97.8% for ammonia and 97.1% for UAN for the post-acquisition period ended December 31, 2016.


Item 7.    Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition, and results of operations and cash flow should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and with the statistical information and financial data included elsewhere in this Report. References to CVR Partners, the Partnership, “we”, “us”, and “our” may refer to consolidated subsidiaries of CVR Partners or one or both of the facilities, as the context may require.
Forward-Looking Statements
This discussion and analysis covers the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and discusses year-to-year comparisons between such periods. The discussions of the year ended December 31, 2018 and year-to-year comparisons between the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 that are not included in this Annual Report including this Management'son Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains "forward-looking statements"Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 filed on February 20, 2020, and such discussions are incorporated by reference into this Report.

Reflected in this discussion and analysis is how management views the Partnership’s current financial condition and results of operations along with key external variables and management actions that may impact the Partnership. Understanding significant external variables, such as defined bymarket conditions, weather, and seasonal trends, among others, and management actions taken to manage the SEC, includingPartnership, address external variables, among others, which will increase users’ understanding of the Partnership, its financial condition and results of operations. This discussion may contain forward looking statements concerning contemplated transactions and strategic plans, expectations and objectives for future operations. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation:
statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future;
statements relating to future financial or operational performance, future distributions, future capital sources and capital expenditures; and
any other statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "plans," "intends," "estimates," "projects," "could," "should," "may" or similar expressions.
Although we believe thatreflect our plans, intentionsestimates and expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements we make in this Report, including this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. These statements are based on assumptions made by us based on our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors that we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. Such statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. You are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance andbeliefs. Our actual results or developments maycould differ materially from those projecteddiscussed in the forward-looking statementsforward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this Report.

Strategy and Goals

Mission and Core Values

Our Mission is to be a top tier North American nitrogen-based fertilizer company as measured by safe and reliable operations, superior performance and profitable growth. The foundation of how we operate is built on five core Values:

Safety - We always put safety first. The protection of our employees, contractors and communities is paramount. We have an unwavering commitment to safety above all else. If it’s not safe, then we don’t do it.

Environment - We care for our environment. Complying with all regulations and minimizing any environmental impact from our operations is essential. We understand our obligation to the environment and that it’s our duty to protect it.

Integrity - We require high business ethics. We comply with the law and practice sound corporate governance. We only conduct business one way—the right way with integrity.

Corporate Citizenship - We are proud members of the communities where we operate. We are good neighbors and know that it’s a privilege we can’t take for granted. We seek to make a positive economic and social impact through our financial donations and the contributions of time, knowledge and talent of our employees to the places where we live and work.

Continuous Improvement - We believe in both individual and team success. We foster accountability under a performance-driven culture that supports creative thinking, teamwork, diversity and personal development so that employees can realize their maximum potential. We use defined work practices for consistency, efficiency and to create value across the organization.

Our core Values are driven by our people, inform the way we do business each and every day and enhance our ability to accomplish our mission and related strategic objectives.

December 31, 2020 | 29


Table of Contents
Strategic Objectives

We have outlined the following strategic objectives to drive the accomplishment of our mission:

Safety - We aim to achieve continuous improvement in all environmental, health, and safety areas through ensuring our people’s commitment to environmental, health and safety comes first, the refinement of existing policies, continuous training, and enhanced monitoring procedures.

Reliability - Our goal is to achieve industry-leading utilization rates at both of our Facilities through safe and reliable operations. We are focusing on improvements in day-to-day plant operations, identifying alternative sources for plant inputs to reduce lost time due to third-party operational constraints, and optimizing our commercial and marketing functions to maintain plant operations at their highest level.

Market Capture - We continuously evaluate opportunities to improve the facilities’ realized pricing at the gate and reduce variable costs incurred in production to maximize our capture of market opportunities.

Financial Discipline - We strive to be efficient as possible by maintaining low operating costs and disciplined deployment of capital.

Achievements

We successfully executed a number of achievements in support of our strategic objectives shown below through the date of this filing despite the challenges experienced by the industry during 2020 as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those set forth under the section captioned "Risk Factors"COVID-19 pandemic:

SafetyReliabilityMarket CaptureFinancial Discipline
Operated all facilities and corporate offices safely and reliably and maintained financial discipline amid COVID-19 pandemic.üüü
Maintained high asset reliability and a combined utilization rate of 98% at both facilities through the fourth quarter of 2020.üüü
Achieved record shipments of ammonia from the East Dubuque Facility during April 2020.üü
Reduced lost profit opportunities by approximately $13.7 million compared to 2019.üüü
Generated first carbon offset credits related to N2O abatement and continued sequestration of CO2 for enhanced crude oil recovery at the Coffeyville Facility.
üü
Reduced operating and SG&A expenses by over 12% in 2020 as compared to 2019.ü
Reduced capital spending by $9 million compared to initial spending plans.ü
Amended and extended the ABL Credit Agreement during the third quarter of 2020.ü
Completed Messer contract renewal with favorable conditions including new backup oxygen tank.ü
Repurchased $7.1 million of CVR Partners common units during 2020.ü

Industry Factors and contained elsewhere in this Report. Such factors include, among others:Market Conditions
our ability to make cash distributions on the common units;
the volatile nature of our business and the variable nature of our distributions;
the ability of our general partner to modify or revoke our distribution policy at any time;
the cyclical nature of our business;
the seasonal nature of our business;
the dependence of our operations on a few third-party suppliers, including providers of transportation services and equipment;
our reliance on pet coke that we purchase from CVR Refining;
our reliance on the natural gas and electricity that we purchase from third parties;
the supply and price levels of essential raw materials;
the risk of a material decline in production at our nitrogen fertilizer plants;
potential operating hazards from accidents, fire, severe weather, floods or other natural disasters;
competition inWithin the nitrogen fertilizer businesses;
capital expenditures and potential liabilities arising from environmental laws and regulations;
existing and proposed environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to climate change, alternative energy or fuel sources, and the end-use and application of fertilizers;
new regulations concerning the transportation of hazardous chemicals, risks of terrorism and the security of chemical manufacturing facilities;

the risk of security breaches;
our lack of asset diversification;
our dependence on significant customers;
the potential loss of our transportation cost advantage over our competitors;
our partial dependence on customer and distributor transportation of purchased goods;
our potential inability to successfully implement our business, strategies, including the completion of significant capital programs;
our reliance on CVR Energy's senior management team and conflicts of interest they face operating each of CVR Partners, CVR Refining and CVR Energy;
the risk of labor disputes and adverse employee relations;
risks relating to our relationships with CVR Energy and CVR Refining;
control of our general partner by CVR Energy;
our ability to continue to license the technology used in our operations;
restrictions in our debt agreements;
changes in our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income or state tax purposes;
instability and volatility in the capital and credit markets; and
CVR Energy and its affiliates may compete with us.
All forward-looking statements contained in this Report speak only as of the date of this Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this Report, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except to the extent required by law.
Overview and Executive Summary
We are a Delaware limited partnership originally formed by CVR Energy to own, operate and grow our nitrogen fertilizer business. We produce and distribute nitrogen fertilizer products, which are used primarily by farmers to improve the yield and quality of their crops. Our principal products are UAN and ammonia, and all of our products are sold on a wholesale basis. We produce our nitrogen fertilizer products at two manufacturing facilities, which are located in Coffeyville, Kansas and East Dubuque, Illinois. We acquired the East Dubuque Facility on April 1, 2016. For a discussion of the East Dubuque Merger, refer to Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report. Refer to Part 1, Item 1 "Business" of this Report for detailed information on our business.
Major Influences on Results of Operations
Our earnings and cash flows from operations are primarily affected by the relationship between nitrogen fertilizer product prices, on-stream factorsutilization, and operating costs and expenses.expenses, including pet coke and natural gas feedstock costs.

December 31, 2020 | 30


Table of Contents
The price at which ournitrogen fertilizer products are ultimately sold depends on numerous factors, including the global supply and demand for nitrogen fertilizer products which, in turn, depends on, among other factors, world grain demand and production levels, changes in world population, the cost and availability of fertilizer transportation infrastructure, weather conditions, the availability of imports, and the extent of government intervention in agriculture markets.

Nitrogen fertilizer prices are also affected by local factors, including local market conditions and the operating levels of competing facilities. An expansion or upgrade of competitors'competitors’ facilities, new facility development, political and economic developments, and other factors are likely to continue to play an important role in nitrogen fertilizer industry economics. These factors can impact, among other things, the level of inventories in the market, resulting in price volatility and a reduction in product margins. Moreover, the industry typically experiences seasonal fluctuations in demand for nitrogen fertilizer products.


General Business Environment

In March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a pandemic, and the President of the United States declared the COVID-19 outbreak a national emergency. The COVID-19 pandemic and actions taken by governments and others in response thereto has and continues to negatively impact the worldwide economy, financial markets, and the agricultural industry. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant business and operational disruptions, including business closures in the restaurant and food supply industries, among others, liquidity strains, demand destruction, as well as supply chain challenges, travel restrictions, stay-at-home orders, and limitations on the availability of the workforce, including farmers in the agricultural industry. As a result, the global demand for liquid transportation fuels, including ethanol (the production of which is a significant driver of demand for fertilizer), has declined, causing many refineries and plants to reduce production or idle, evidenced by a decline in the fourth quarter 2020 average ethanol production of 10% compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. Given recent market conditions, the processing of sweet crude oil, including at the crude oil refinery owned and operated by Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC (“CRRM”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Energy, has increased compared to 2019 resulting in lower sour crude oil being processed and pet coke being produced. As a result, increased costs may continue to be incurred by the Partnership in future periods to source feedstocks, such as pet coke. Concerns over the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on economic and business prospects across the world have contributed to increased market and grain price volatility, and uncertainty in food supply demands, and have diminished expectations for the global economy. These factors may precipitate a prolonged economic slowdown and recession, which may lead to some decline in demand for the Partnership’s products in the first quarter of 2021 and beyond.

The Partnership believes the general business environment in which it operates will continue to remain volatile during 2021, driven by uncertainty around the availability and prices of its feedstocks and the demand for its products. As a result, the Partnership anticipates its future operating results and current and long-term financial condition may be negatively impacted. Due to the rapidly evolving situation, the uncertainty of its duration, and the timing of recovery, the Partnership is not able at this time to predict the extent to which these events may have a material, or any, effect on its financial or operational results in future periods.

Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

As of December 31, 2019, the Partnership had a goodwill balance of $41.0 million associated with our Coffeyville Facility reporting unit for which the estimated fair value had been in excess of carrying value based on our 2018 and 2019 assessments. As a result of a favorable global demand environmentlower expectations for grains, nitrogen fertilizer prices rose to near historic levels beginning in 2011. In addition, North American producers began to benefit from lower natural gas prices due to the significant increase in shale basin and other non-conventional productionmarket conditions in the region.fertilizer industry, the market performance of the Partnership’s common units, a qualitative analysis, and additional risks associated with the business, the Partnership concluded a triggering event had occurred that required an interim quantitative impairment assessment of goodwill for this reporting unit during the second quarter of 2020. The combinationresults of higher nitrogen fertilizer prices globallythe impairment test indicated that the carrying amount of the Coffeyville Facility reporting unit exceeded the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, and a feedstock cost advantage led to high margins for North American nitrogen fertilizer producers. This resulted in numerous announcements for expansion plans for existing plants as well as new facility developmentfull impairment of the asset was required. Significant assumptions inherent in the corn beltvaluation methodologies for goodwill include, but are not limited to, prospective financial information, growth rates, discount rates, inflationary factors, and cost of capital. To evaluate the sensitivity of the fair value calculations for the reporting unit, the Partnership applied a hypothetical 1% favorable change in the weighted average cost of capital, and separately, increased the revenue projections by 10%, holding gross margins steady. The results of these sensitivity analyses confirmed the need to record a non-cash impairment charge of $41.0 million during 2020. There is no goodwill remaining as of December 31, 2020.

With the adverse economic impacts discussed above and the gulf coast. The substantial majorityuncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a heightened risk that amounts recognized, including other long-lived assets, may not be recoverable. While our assessment in 2020 did not identify the existence of an impairment indicator for our long-lived asset groups, we continue to monitor the
December 31, 2020 | 31


Table of Contents
current environment, including the duration and breadth of the additional supply from this expansion phase in North America came online in 2017. We expect product pricing may experience volatility asimpacts that the new supply displaces imports intopandemic will have on demand for our fertilizer products, to assess whether qualitative factors indicate a quantitative assessment is required. If a quantitative test is performed, the U.S. However, overextent to which the longer-term the U.S.recoverability of our long-lived assets could be impaired is expected to remainunknown. Such impairment could have a net importersignificant adverse impact on our results of nitrogen fertilizer with domestic prices influenced by the higher cost of imported tons into the U.S.operations; however, an impairment would have no impact on our financial condition or liquidity.
Since mid-2013, global nitrogen fertilizer prices have trended down as global grain supply increased and growth in grain demand slowed due to more challenging worldwide economic considerations.
Market Conditions

While there is risk of shorter-term volatility given the inherent nature of the commodity cycle and the longer-termimpacts of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the Partnership believes the long-term fundamentals for the U.S. nitrogen fertilizer industry remain intact. We viewThe Partnership views the anticipated combination of (i) increasing global population, (ii) decreasing arable land per capita, (iii) continued evolution to more protein-based diets in developing countries, (iv) sustained use of corn as feedstock for the domestic production of ethanol, and (v) positioning at the lower end of the global cost curve will continue toshould provide a solid foundation for nitrogen fertilizer producers in the U.S. over the longer term.

While weather conditions in 2020 exhibited normal patterns, weather significantly impacted the timing of the planting season for corn and soybeans in 2019. Due to excessive wet conditions, crops were planted later than normal in the spring which led to a late harvest of these crops in the fall of 2019. As a result, the ammonia application season in the fall of 2019 was shortened. This created a surplus of ammonia inventory in the market during the winter of 2019 leading into 2020. UAN continues to be impacted by the imposition of import duties on UAN product by the European Union (the “EU”). This has resulted in shifts in UAN trade flows for product that had previously been shipped to the EU. In order2020, natural gas prices across the world declined significantly as compared to 2019; however, since the summer of 2020, forward market prices indicate significantly higher prices for 2021 versus historically low prices in 2020. Natural gas is the primary feedstock for production of nitrogen fertilizers. As a result of these factors, in the fourth quarter of 2020, the Partnership has started to see an uptrend in pricing related to these products, with the expectation that product prices will continue to see an uptrend into the first quarter of 2021.

Corn and soybean are two major crops planted by farmers in North America. Corn crops result in the depletion of the amount of nitrogen and ammonia within the soil in which it is grown, which in turn, results in the need for these nutrients to be replenished after each growing cycle. Unlike corn, soybeans are able to obtain their own nitrogen through a process known as “N fixation.” As such, upon harvesting of soybeans, the soil retains a certain amount of nitrogen which results in lower demand for nitrogen fertilizer for the following corn planting cycle. Due to these factors, nitrogen fertilizer consumers generally operate a balanced corn-soybean rotational planting cycle as evident through the chart presented below for 2020, 2019 and 2018.

The relationship between the total acres planted for both corn and soybean has a direct impact on the overall demand for nitrogen products. As the number of corn acres increases, the market and demand for nitrogen also increases. Correspondingly, as the number of soybean acres increases, the market and demand for nitrogen decreases. Additionally, an estimated 8 billion pounds of soybean oil is expected to go towards producing cleaner biodiesel in 2020 and 2021. Multiple refiners have announced biodiesel expansion projects for 2021 and beyond, which will only increase the demand and capacity for soybeans. Due to the uncertainty of how these factors will truly affect the soybean market, it is not yet known how the nitrogen business will be impacted.

Ethanol is blended with gasoline to meet renewable fuel standard requirements and for its octane value. Ethanol production has historically consumed approximately 35% of the U.S. corn crop, so demand for corn generally rises and falls with ethanol demand. There has been a decline in ethanol demand in 2020 due to decreased demand for transportation fuels as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the lower ethanol demand did not alter the spring 2020 planting decisions by farmers as evidenced in the charts below.
December 31, 2020 | 32


Table of Contents
cvi-20201231_g4.jpgcvi-20201231_g5.jpg
(1)Information used within this chart was obtained from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (“EIA”).
(2)Information used within this chart was obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), National Agricultural Statistics Services.

The 2020 USDA reports on corn and soybean acres planted indicated farmers planted approximately 91.0 million acres of corn, representing an increase of 1.4% in corn acres planted as compared to 89.7 million corn acres in 2019. Planted soybean acres are estimated to be 83.1 million acres, representing a 9.2% increase in soybean acres planted as compared to 76.1 million soybean acres in 2019. Since the summer of 2020, adverse weather conditions in parts of the Midwest caused the USDA to lower estimated crop yields, particularly for corn. Further, higher demand for soybeans and corn and lower grain inventories have led to a rally in crop prices for 2020 and 2021 and significantly improved farmer economics. As a result, we experienced strong demand for ammonia for fall application and fertilizer crop inputs for the spring of 2021. Prices for natural gas, the primary input for nitrogen fertilizer production, rose in the fourth quarter of 2020 in the U.S. and rose even more significantly in international markets. The increase in natural gas prices in the U.S. has been more than offset by higher product pricing, and the competitiveness of U.S. nitrogen producers has improved considerably.

The tables below show relevant market indicators by month through December 31, 2020:
cvi-20201231_g6.jpgcvi-20201231_g7.jpg
(1)Information used within these charts was obtained from various third-party sources including Green Markets (a Bloomberg Company), Pace Petroleum Coke Quarterly, and the EIA, amongst others.
December 31, 2020 | 33


Table of Contents
Results of Operations

The following should be read in conjunction with the information outlined within the previous sections of this Part II, Item 7, the financial statements, and related notes thereto in Part II, Item 8 of this Report.

The charts presented below summarize our ammonia utilization rates on a consolidated basis and at each of our Facilities. Utilization is an important measure used by management to assess operational output at each of the Partnership’s facilities. Utilization is calculated as actual tons produced divided by capacity adjusted for planned maintenance and turnarounds.

The presentation of our utilization is on a two-year rolling average which takes into account the impact of our planned and unplanned outages on any specific period. We believe the two-year rolling average is a more useful presentation of the long-term utilization performance of our Facilities.

Utilization is presented solely on ammonia production rather than each nitrogen product as it provides a comparative baseline against industry peers and eliminates the disparity of facility configurations for upgrade of ammonia into other nitrogen products. With efforts primarily focused on ammonia upgrade capabilities, we believe this measure provides a meaningful view of how well we operate.
cvi-20201231_g8.jpgcvi-20201231_g9.jpg
On a consolidated basis, utilization increased 2% to 95% for the two years ended December 31, 2020 compared to the two years ended December 31, 2019. This increase was primarily a result of ammonia storage capacity constraints at the East Dubuque Facility in the first quarter of 2019 due to inclement weather impacting customers’ ability to apply ammonia and the turnaround at the East Dubuque Facility in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Sales and Pricing per Ton - Two of our key operating performance, we calculatemetrics are total sales for ammonia and UAN along with the product pricing per ton realized at gate asthe gate. Total sales for ammonia and UAN were favorable due to strong demand during the spring application coupled with heavy fill orders from the summer through year end caused by higher crop prices increasing farmer demand. Additionally, higher total utilization for 2020 increased the total products available for sale for ammonia and UAN. This increase in production is coupled with an input to determine our operating margin.increased draw of ammonia and UAN inventory for 2020. Product pricing at gate represents net sales less freight revenue divided by product sales volume in tons. We believe producttons and is shown in order to provide a pricing at gate ismeasure comparable across the fertilizer industry.
December 31, 2020 | 34


Table of Contents
cvi-20201231_g10.jpgcvi-20201231_g11.jpg
Production Volumes - Gross tons produced for ammonia represent the total ammonia produced, including ammonia produced, that was upgraded into other fertilizer products. Net tons available for sale represent the ammonia available for sale that was not upgraded into other fertilizer products. The table below presents these metrics for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands of tons)202020192018
Ammonia (gross produced)852 766 794 
Ammonia (net available for sale)303 223 246 
UAN1,303 1,255 1,276 

Feedstock - Our Coffeyville Facilityutilizes a meaningful measure because we sell products at our plant gates and terminal locations' gates ("sold gate") and deliveredpet coke gasification process to the customer's designated delivery site ("sold delivered"). The relative percentage of sold gate versus sold delivered can change period to period. The product pricing at gate provides a measure that is consistently comparable period to period.
We and other competitors in the U.S. farm belt share a significant transportation cost advantage when compared to our out-of-region competitors in serving the U.S. farm belt agricultural market.produce nitrogen fertilizer. Our products leave our Coffeyville Facility either in railcars for destinations located principally on the Union Pacific Railroad or in trucks for direct shipment to customers. We do not currently incur significant intermediate transfer, storage, barge freight or pipeline freight charges; however, we do incur costs to maintain and repair our railcar fleet including expenses related to regulatory inspections and repairs. For example, many of our railcars require specific regulatory inspections and repairs due on ten-year intervals. The extent and frequency of railcar fleet maintenance and repair costs are generally expected to change based partially on when regulatory inspections and repairs are due for our railcars under the relevant regulations.
The East Dubuque Facility uses natural gas in its production of ammonia. The table below presents these feedstocks for both facilities for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Pet coke used in production (thousand tons)523 535 463 
Pet coke (dollars per ton)$35.25 $37.47 $28.41 
Natural gas used in production (thousands of MMBtu) (1)8,611 6,856 7,933 
Natural gas used in production (dollars per MMBtu) (1)$2.31 $2.88 $3.28 
Natural gas in cost of materials and other (thousands of MMBtu) (1)9,349 6,961 7,122 
Natural gas in cost of materials and other (dollars per MMBtu) (1)$2.35 $3.08 $3.15 
(1)The feedstock natural gas shown above does not include natural gas used for fuel. The cost of natural gas used for fuel is locatedincluded in northwest Illinois,Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization).

Financial Highlights

Overview - For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Partnership’s operating loss and net loss were $34.9 million and $98.2 million, respectively, a $62.3 million decrease in operating income and a $63.2 million increase in net loss, respectively, compared to the corn belt. The East Dubuque Facilityyear ended December 31, 2019 driven primarily sells its productby lower net sales and the recognition of a non-cash impairment charge of $41.0 million driven primarily by the lower pricing environment observed in 2020. These impacts were offset by higher sales volumes and reductions to customers located within 200 milesoperating expense.
December 31, 2020 | 35


Table of Contents
cvi-20201231_g12.jpgcvi-20201231_g13.jpg
cvi-20201231_g14.jpgcvi-20201231_g15.jpg
(1)See “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” section below for reconciliations of the facility. In most instances, customers take delivery of nitrogen products atnon-GAAP measures shown above.

Net Sales - Net sales decreased by $54.2 million to $350.0 million for the plant and arrange and payyear ended December 31, 2020 compared to transport themthe year ended December 31, 2019.This decrease wasprimarily due to their final destinations by truck. The East Dubuque Facility has direct accessunfavorable pricing conditions which contributed $99.0 million in lower revenues offset with increased sales volumes contributing $45.8 million as compared to a barge dock on the Mississippi River as well as a nearby rail spur serviced by the Canadian National Railway Company.
We upgrade substantially all of our ammonia production at our Coffeyville Facility into UAN and will continue to do so for as long as it makes economic sense.year ended December 31, 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015, we upgraded approximately 88%, 93%2019, net sales included $33.3 million and 96%$33.4 million in freight revenue, respectively, and $10.1 million and $7.6 million in other revenue, respectively.

The following table demonstrates the impact of our Coffeyville Facility ammonia production into UAN, a product that presently generates greater profit than ammonia. The East Dubuque Facility haschanges in sales volumes and pricing for the flexibility to significantly vary its product mix. This enables us to upgrade our ammonia production into varying amountsprimary components of UAN, nitric acidnet sales, excluding urea products, freight, and liquid and granulated urea each season, depending on market demand, pricing and storage availability. Product sales at our East Dubuque Facility are heavily weighted toward sales of ammonia and UAN. For bothother revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2017 and post-acquisition period2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately 44% of our East Dubuque Facility produced ammonia tons were upgraded to other products.2019.
(in thousands)
Price
 Variance
Volume
 Variance
UAN$(63,047)$10,109 
Ammonia(35,999)35,649 

The high fixed costdecrease in UAN and ammonia sales pricing for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily attributable to competitive pricing pressures seen throughout the domestic and international markets. For UAN, a softening natural gas market, which is the typical feedstock for nitrogen plants, shifting trade flows in UAN due to the imposition of import duties on UAN in the Coffeyville Facility's direct operating expense structureEU contributed to lower prices. Additionally, lower corn prices due to decreased demand for corn for ethanol blending further contributed to lower UAN prices. For ammonia, lower natural gas and corn prices and reduced demand for industrial uses of ammonia contributed to lower prices. The increase in UAN and ammonia sales volumes for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily attributable to strong demand during the 2020 spring application period coupled with heavy fill orders beginning in the summer
December 31, 2020 | 36


Table of Contents
of 2020 through year end. Additionally, higher crop prices in the second half of 2020 led to greater farmer demand, which was also directly affects our profitability. Our Coffeyville Facility'saided by favorable weather conditions for application.

cvi-20201231_g16.jpgcvi-20201231_g17.jpg
(1)Exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense.

Cost of Materials and Other - Cost of materials and other for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $91.1 million, compared to $94.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The $3.0 million decrease was comprised primarily of a $1.6 million decrease in pet coke gasification process results in a significantly higher percentage of fixed costs than a natural gas-based fertilizer plant, such as our East Dubuque Facility. In addition, while less than our Coffeyville Facility, our East Dubuque Facility has a significant amount of fixed costs. Major fixed operating expenses include a large portion of electrical energy, employee labor, and maintenance, including contract labor, and outside services.
Our largest raw material expense used in the production of ammonia at our Coffeyville Facility isdue to lower purchases of pet coke which we purchase from CVR Refiningthe Coffeyville Refinery, a decrease in freight expenses and third parties. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016distribution costs of $1.4 million due to higher 2019 freight charges on sales agreements, a decrease in other feedstocks purchases of $1.2 million due to lower purchases of hydrogen and 2015, we expensed approximately $8.1nitrogen, and a decrease related to a draw in our ammonia and UAN inventories contributing $0.6 million $7.8 million and $11.9 million, respectively,driven by higher crop prices leading to greater farmer demand coupled with favorable weather for pet coke, which equaledapplication through year end, offset by an average cost per tonincrease in purchases of $17, $15 and $25, respectively.
Our largest raw material expense used in the production ofthird-party ammonia at our East Dubuque Facility is natural gas, which we purchase from third parties. Our East Dubuque Facility's natural gas process results in a higher percentage of variable costs as

compared to the Coffeyville Facility.Facility contributing $1.8 million.

Direct Operating Expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) - For the year ended December 31, 20172020,direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and 2016, we incurred approximately $26.3amortization) were $157.9 million and $13.3as compared to $173.6 million for feedstock natural gas, which equaled an averagethe year ended December 31, 2019. The $15.7 million decrease was primarily due to decreased turnaround costs of $9.1 million relating to the 2019 turnaround for our East Dubuque Facility and a decrease in $1.3 million of repairs and maintenance cost of $3.26 and $2.87 per MMBtu.
Consistent, safe and reliable operationsfor brick replacement at our nitrogen fertilizer plants are critical to our financial performance and results of operations. In addition, consistent, safe and reliable operations at the Linde air separation unit, which supplies oxygen, nitrogen and compressed dry air to our Coffeyville Facility is critical to our financial performance and results of operations. Unplanned downtime at either of our facilities or at the Linde air separation unit may resultwith no similar activity in lost margin opportunity, increased maintenance expense and a temporary increase in working capital investment and related inventory position. The financial impact of planned downtime, such as major turnaround maintenance, is mitigated through a diligent planning process that takes into account margin environment, the availability of resources to perform the needed maintenance, feedstock logistics and other factors.
Historically, the Coffeyville Facility has undergone a full facility turnaround approximately every two to three years. The Coffeyville Facility underwent a full facility turnaround in the third quarter of 2015 and the gasifier, ammonia and UAN units were down for between 17 to 20 days each at a cost of approximately $7.02020. Utility costs decreased by $3.0 million exclusive of the impacts due to the lost production during the downtime. Thelower cost of natural gas resulting from favorable market conditions and lower electricity costs at our Coffeyville Facility is planningdue to undergo the next scheduled full facility turnaroundrate reductions achieved in the second quarter of 2018, which is expected2020. Other reductions to last approximately 15 days at an estimated cost of $7 million, exclusive ofoperating expense in 2020 reflect the impact of cost reduction efforts put in place to address the lost production duringgeneral business environment.
cvi-20201231_g18.jpgcvi-20201231_g19.jpg
Depreciation and Amortization Expense - Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $3.7 million for the downtime.
Historically, the East Dubuque Facility has also undergone a full facility turnaround approximately every two to three years. The East Dubuque Facility underwent a full facility turnaround in the second quarter of 2016 and the ammonia and UAN units were down for approximately 28 days at a cost of approximately $6.6 million, exclusive of the impacts dueyear ended December 31, 2020 compared to the lost production duringyear ended December 31, 2019, as a result of accelerated depreciation of certain assets that
December 31, 2020 | 37


Table of Contents
were removed following the downtime. We determined that there were more pressing preventative maintenance issues at the East Dubuque Facility, so we completed a scheduled2019 turnaround at the East Dubuque Facility, coupled with additions to property, plant, and equipment during the current year.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses, and Other - Selling, general and administrative expenses and other decreased approximately $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease was primarily related to a reduced amount of asset write offs in 2020 compared to 2019 contributing $2.8 million, coupled with decreased personnel costs and management fees of $7.2 million driven by lower allocated expense from CVR Energy, including stock-based compensation expense as a result of lower market prices for CVR Energy share and Partnership units during 2020.

Non-GAAP Measures

Our management uses certain non-GAAP performance measures, and reconciliations to those measures, to evaluate current and past performance and prospects for the thirdfuture to supplement our GAAP financial information presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures are important factors in assessing our operating results and profitability and include the performance and liquidity measures defined below.

Effective January 1, 2020, the Partnership no longer presents the non-GAAP performance measure of Adjusted EBITDA, as management no longer relies on this financial measure when evaluating the Partnership’s performance and does not believe it enhances the users understanding of its financial statements in a useful manner.

The following are non-GAAP measures we present for the year ended December 31, 2020:

EBITDA - Net income (loss) before (i) interest expense, net, (ii) income tax expense (benefit) and (iii) depreciation and amortization expense.

Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities to EBITDA - Net cash provided by operating activities reduced by (i) interest expense, net, (ii) income tax expense (benefit), (iii) change in working capital, and (iv) other non-cash adjustments.

Available Cash for Distribution - EBITDA for the quarter excluding non-cash income or expense items (if any), for which adjustment is deemed necessary or appropriate by the board of 2017directors (the “Board”) of our general partner in its sole discretion, less (i) reserves for maintenance capital expenditures, debt service and other contractual obligations, and (ii) reserves for future operating or capital needs (if any), in each case, that the ammoniaBoard deems necessary or appropriate in its sole discretion. Available cash for distribution may be increased by the release of previously established cash reserves, if any, and UAN units were down for approximately 14 daysother excess cash, at a cost of approximately $2.6 million, exclusivethe discretion of the impactsBoard.

We present these measures because we believe they may help investors, analysts, lenders, and ratings agencies analyze our results of the lost production during the downtime.
Subsequent to the fourth quarter of 2017, the East Dubuque Facility experienced an additional outage caused by a boiler feed water leak resultingoperations and liquidity in 12 days of downtime, and the associated repair costs were not material.
Agreementsconjunction with CVR Energy and CVR Refining
We are party to several agreements with CVR Energy and its affiliates that govern the business relations among us, CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including CVR Refining, and our general partner). These include the pet coke supply agreement under which we buy the pet coke we use in our nitrogen fertilizer plant; a services agreement, under which CVR Energy and its affiliates provide us with management services including the services of its senior management team; a feedstock and shared services agreement, which governs the provision of feedstocks,U.S. GAAP results, including, but not limited to, high-pressure steam, nitrogen, instrument air, oxygenour operating performance as compared to other publicly traded companies in the fertilizer industry, without regard to historical cost basis or financing methods, and natural gas; a hydrogen purchaseour ability to incur and sale agreement, which governsservice debt and fund capital expenditures. Non-GAAP measures have important limitations as analytical tools, because they exclude some, but not all, items that affect net earnings and operating income. These measures should not be considered substitutes for their most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures. Refer to the purchase of hydrogenNon-GAAP Reconciliations” included herein for our Coffeyville Facility; a raw water and facilities sharing agreement, which allocates raw water resources between the two facilities in Coffeyville; an easement agreement; an environmental agreement; a lease agreement pursuant to which we lease office space and laboratory space; and certain financing agreements we entered into in connection with the East Dubuque Merger. These agreements were not the result of arm's length negotiations and the termsreconciliation of these agreements areamounts. Due to rounding, numbers presented within this section may not necessarily as favorableadd or equal to the parties to these agreements as terms which could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties. See Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") to Part II, Item 8 ofnumbers or totals presented elsewhere within this Report for additional discussion of the agreements.document.

Factors Affecting Comparability of Our Financial Results

Our historical results of operations for the periods presented may not be comparable with prior periods or to our results of operations in the future for the reasons discussed below.
East Dubuque Merger
On April 1, 2016, the Partnership completed the East Dubuque Merger, whereby the Partnership acquired the East Dubuque Facility. The consolidated financial statements and key operating metrics include the results of the East Dubuque Facility beginning on April 1, 2016, the date of the closing of the acquisition. During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership incurred $3.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of legal and other professional fees and other merger-related expenses, which were included in selling, general and administrative expenses. See Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report for further discussion.


Major Scheduled Turnaround Activities
Scheduled full facility turnarounds occurred at the East Dubuque Facility during the third quarter of 2017 and during the second quarter of 2016. A scheduled full facility turnaround occurred at the Coffeyville Facility during the third quarter of 2015.
Overall, our results wereare negatively impacted by the cost of turnaround, as well as the lost margin due to the lost production during the downtime. See "Major Influences on Results of Operations" above for further discussion of turnaround activities.
Unplanned Downtime
Linde owns, operates and maintains the air separation plant that provides contract volumes of oxygen, nitrogen, and compressed dry air to our Coffeyville Facility. During the third quarter of 2015, the Linde air separation unit experienced downtime, in excess of the downtime associated with the scheduled full facility turnaround discussed above, that resulted in the gasification, ammonia and UAN units at our Coffeyville Facility being down for between 16 to 19 days each. Overall results were negatively impacted due to the lost production during the downtime that resultedresults in reducedlost sales and certain reduced variable expenses included in costCost of materials and other and directDirect operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) for the. The year ended December 31, 2015.
Production levels in the third quarter of 2017 were impacted by eight days of unplanned downtime due to an exchanger outage at our East Dubuque Facility. Production levels in the fourth quarter of 2017 were negatively impacted by approximately 12 days of unplanned downtime due to a refractory failing in the piping at our East Dubuque Facility. Repair costs for these unplanned outages were not material.
Indebtedness
On April 1, 2016, as a result2020 had no planned turnarounds. The effects of the East Dubuque Merger, the Partnership acquired CVR Nitrogen, including its debt. During the second quarter of 2016, the Partnership used $300.0 million of funds from the senior term loan creditplanned, full facility with Coffeyville Resources, LLC, a related party, to finance the payoff of CVR Partners' $125.0 million term loan, payoff CVR Nitrogen's credit facility outstanding balance of $49.1 million, and to fund the cash merger consideration and certain merger-related expenses. In June 2016, the Partnership issued $645.0 million aggregate principal of 9.250% Senior Secured Notes due 2023 to refinance the substantial majority of its existing debt. Also as a result of the financing transactions, the Partnership recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of approximately $5.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2016. As a result2020 | 38


Table of the financing transactions, the Partnership's interest expense increased forContents
turnarounds completed during the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016 as compared2018, exclusive of the impacts due to lost production during the year endedturnaround downtime, are shown below:
FacilityRelated PeriodTurnaround Downtime
Turnaround Expense
(in thousands)
Estimated Lost Production
(in tons of Ammonia)
East Dubuque2019 - 3rd/4th Quarter32 days9,842 33,706 
Coffeyville2018 - 2nd Quarter15 days6,399 21,450 

Goodwill Impairment

As of December 31, 2015.
Industry Factors
A broad range2019, the Partnership had a goodwill balance of factors, including those outlined below, primarily affects$41.0 million associated with our operating results.
Commodities
Our products are globally traded commoditiesCoffeyville Facility reporting unit for which the estimated fair value had been in excess of carrying value based on our 2018 and are subject to price competition. The customers for our products make their purchasing decisions principally on the basis of delivered price and, to a lesser extent, on customer service and product quality. The selling prices of our products fluctuate in response to global market conditions and changes in supply and demand.
Agricultural
The three primary forms of nitrogen fertilizer used in the United States of America are ammonia, urea and UAN. Unlike ammonia and urea, UAN can be applied throughout the growing season and can be applied in tandem with pesticides and herbicides, providing farmers with flexibility and cost savings.2019 assessments. As a result of these factors, UAN typically commands a premium price to urea and ammonia, on a nitrogen equivalent basis.
Nutrients are depleted in soil over time and therefore must be replenished through fertilizer use. Nitrogen is the most quickly depleted nutrient and must be replenished every year, whereas phosphate and potassium can be retained in soillower expectations for up to three years. Plants require nitrogenmarket conditions in the largest amounts and it accounts for approximately 57% of primary fertilizer consumption on a nutrient ton basis, perindustry, the International Fertilizer Industry Association.

Supply and Demand Factors
Global demand for fertilizers is driven primarily by grain demand and prices, which, in turn, are driven by population growth, farmland per capita, dietary changes in the developing world and increased consumption of bio-fuels. According to the International Fertilizer Industry Association, from 1974 to 2015, global fertilizer demand grew 2.0% annually. Global fertilizer use, consisting of nitrogen, phosphate and potassium, is projected to increase by 34% between 2010 and 2030 to meet global food demand according to a study funded by the Food and Agricultural Organizationmarket performance of the United Nations. Currently, the developed world uses fertilizer more intensively than the developing world, but sustained economic growth in emerging markets is increasing food demandPartnership’s common units, a qualitative analysis, and fertilizer use. In addition, populations in developing countries are shifting to more protein-rich diets as their incomes increase, with such consumption requiring more grain for animal feed. As an example, China's wheat and coarse grains production is estimated to have increased 33% between 2007 and 2017, but still failed to keep pace with increases in demand, prompting China to grow its wheat and coarse grain imports by more than 1,200% over the same period, according to the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA").
The United States is the world's largest exporter of coarse grains, accounting for 34% of world exports and 30% of world production for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, according to the USDA. A substantial amount of nitrogen is consumed in production of these crops to increase yield. Based on Fertecon’s 2017 estimates, the United States is the world’s third largest consumer of nitrogen fertilizer and the world's largest importer of nitrogen fertilizer. Fertecon estimates indicate that the United States represented 11% of total global nitrogen fertilizer consumption for 2017, with China and India as the top consumers representing 27% and 14% of total global nitrogen fertilizer consumption, respectively.
North American nitrogen fertilizer producers predominantly use natural gas as their primary feedstocks. Over the last five years, U.S. oil and natural gas reserves have increased significantly due to, among other factors, advances in extracting shale oil and gas as well as relatively high oil and gas prices. More recently, global demand has slowed with production staying steady even as oil and gas prices have declined substantially over the past two years. This has led to significantly reduced natural gas and oil prices as compared to historical prices. As a result, North America has become a low-cost region for nitrogen fertilizer production.
The decline of natural gas prices have led to existing and new producers considering construction of new or expanding existing nitrogen fertilizer production facilities in the United States. The substantial majority of the incremental nitrogen fertilizer supplyadditional risks associated with the constructionbusiness, the Partnership concluded a triggering event had occurred that required an interim quantitative impairment assessment of confirmed new production facilities is expectedgoodwill for this reporting unit as of June 30, 2020. Significant assumptions inherent in the valuation methodologies for goodwill include, but are not limited to, be substantially completed in 2018. Once the increased production comes on-stream, we expect the United States will still require net imports into the United States to meet domestic demand for nitrogen fertilizers.
2017 Market Conditions
Our 2017 results were impacted by new U.S. domestic nitrogen production and the resulting low nitrogen fertilizer selling prices. Through most of 2017, pricing for U.S. nitrogen fertilizer often traded below parity with international pricing due to the new U.S. supply. Seasonal decreases in agricultural demand combined with delayed customer purchasing activity resulted in multi-year lows in nitrogen fertilizer selling prices during the second half of the year. Our average selling price for UAN for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $152 per ton compared to $177 per ton in 2016, a decrease of 14%, and the average selling price for ammonia for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $280 per ton compared to $376 per ton in 2016.
Results of Operations
The period to period comparisons of our results of operations have been prepared using the historical periods included in our consolidated financial statements. In order to effectively review and assess our historicalprospective financial information, below, we have also included supplemental operating measuresgrowth rates, discount rates, inflationary factors, and industry measures that we believe are material to understanding our business.
To supplement our actual results calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for the applicable periods, the Partnership also uses certain non-GAAP financial measures, which are reconciled to our GAAP based results below. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP results.
The following tables summarize the financial data and key operating statistics for CVR Partners and our subsidiaries for fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.cost of capital. The results of operations for our East Dubuquethe impairment test indicated that the carrying amount of the Coffeyville Facility are included forreporting unit exceeded the post-acquisition period beginning April 1, 2016. The following data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statementsestimated fair value of the reporting unit, and a full impairment of the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report.asset was required. No such charge was recognized during 2019.


Insurance Recovery
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
 (in millions)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:     
Net sales$330.8
 $356.3
 $289.2
      
Cost of materials and other – Affiliates7.5
 2.6
 6.7
Cost of materials and other – Third parties77.4
 91.1
 58.5
 84.9
 93.7
 65.2
Direct operating expenses – Affiliates (1) (2)3.9
 4.2
 4.1
Direct operating expenses – Third parties (1) (2)149.0
 137.5
 95.0
Major scheduled turnaround expenses2.6
 6.6
 7.0
 155.5
 148.3
 106.1
Depreciation and amortization74.0
 58.2
 28.4
Cost of sales314.4
 300.2
 199.7
      
Selling, general and administrative expenses – Affiliates (3)15.6
 15.0
 14.0
Selling, general and administrative expenses – Third parties (3)10.0
 14.3
 6.8
 25.6
 29.3
 20.8
Operating income (loss)(9.2) 26.8
 68.7
Interest expense and other financing costs(62.9) (48.6) (7.0)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (4.9) 
Other income (expense), net(0.5) 0.1
 0.3
Total other expense(63.4) (53.4) (6.7)
Income (loss) before income tax expense(72.6) (26.6) 62.0
Income tax expense0.2
 0.3
 
Net income (loss)$(72.8) $(26.9) $62.0
      
EBITDA (4)*$64.3
 $80.2
 $97.4
Adjusted EBITDA (4)*$65.8
 $92.7
 $106.8
Available cash for distribution (5)*$(9.7) $48.6
 $81.0
      
Reconciliation to net sales:     
Fertilizer sales net at gate$290.0
 $309.0
 $248.8
Freight in revenue32.8
 33.0
 27.2
Hydrogen revenue0.4
 3.2
 11.8
Other, including the impact of purchase accounting7.6
 11.1
 1.4
Total net sales$330.8
 $356.3
 $289.2

* See footnote (4) and (5) below for discussionDuring the fourth quarter of non-GAAP financial measures.

(1)Direct operating expenses are shown exclusive of depreciation and amortization.
(2)Amounts are shown exclusive of major scheduled turnaround expenses that are separately disclosed.
(3)The Partnership incurred approximately $3.12018, the Partnership recognized a $6.1 million and $2.3 million of legal and other professional fees and other merger-related expense, as discussed in Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger") to Part II, Item 8 of this Report, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(4)EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before (i) interest (income) expense, (ii) income tax expense and (iii) depreciation and amortization expense.


Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted for the impact of non-cash share-based compensation, and, when applicable, major scheduled turnaround expense, gain or loss on extinguishment of debt, loss on disposition of assets, expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger and business interruption insurance recovery when applicable.

We present EBITDA because we believe it allows users of our financial statements, such as investors and analysts, to assess our financial performance without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis. We present Adjusted EBITDA because we have found it helpful to consider an operating measure that excludes amounts, such as major scheduled turnaround expenses, gain or loss on extinguishment of debt, loss on disposition of assets, expenses associated with an outage at the East Dubuque Merger and business interruption insuranceCoffeyville Facility during 2017. The recovery relatingis recorded in Other income, net. No such income was recognized in 2020 or 2019.

Non-GAAP Reconciliations

Reconciliation of Net Loss to transactions not reflectiveEBITDA
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Net loss$(98,181)$(34,969)$(50,027)
Add:
Interest expense, net63,428 62,636 62,588 
Income tax expense (benefit)30 (18)(46)
Depreciation and amortization76,077 79,839 71,575 
EBITDA$41,354 $107,488 $84,090 


Reconciliation of our core operations. When applicable, each of these amounts is discussed herein, so that investors have complete information about these amounts. We also present AdjustedNet Cash Provided ByOperating Activities to EBITDA because it is the starting point used by the board of directors of our general partner when calculating our available cash for distribution.

Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Net cash provided by operating activities$19,740 $39,157 $32,234 
Non-cash items:
Goodwill impairment(40,969)— — 
Other(6,630)(10,503)(8,430)
Adjustments:
Interest expense, net63,428 62,636 62,588 
Income tax expense (benefit)30 (18)(46)
Change in assets and liabilities5,755 16,216 (2,256)
EBITDA$41,354 $107,488 $84,090 
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not recognized terms under GAAP and should not be substituted for net income (loss) or cash flows from operations. Management believes that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA enable investors and analysts to better understand our ability to make distributions to common unitholders, help investors and analysts evaluate our ongoing operating results and allow for greater transparency in reviewing our overall financial, operational and economic performance by allowing investors to evaluate the same information used by management. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA presented by other companies may not be comparable to our presentation, since each company may define these terms differently.

A reconciliation of consolidated Net income (loss) to consolidated EBITDA and consolidated Adjusted EBITDA is as follows:


 Three Months Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2017 2016 2015
        
 (in millions)
Net income (loss)$(27.4) $(72.8) $(26.9) $62.0
Add:       
Interest expense and other financing costs, net15.8
 62.9
 48.6
 7.0
Income tax expense0.2
 0.2
 0.3
 
Depreciation and amortization19.1
 74.0
 58.2
 28.4
EBITDA$7.7
 $64.3
 $80.2
 $97.4
Add:       
Major scheduled turnaround expenses
 2.6
 6.6
 7.0
Share-based compensation, non-cash
 
 
 0.1
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 4.9
 
Expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger
 
 3.1
 2.3
Less:       
Insurance recovery - business interruption
 (1.1) (2.1) 
Adjusted EBITDA$7.7
 $65.8
 $92.7
 $106.8

(5)The board of directors of our general partner has a policy to calculate available cash for distribution starting with Adjusted EBITDA. For the periods presented, available cash for distribution equaled our Adjusted EBITDA reduced for cash needed for (i) net cash interest expense (excluding capitalized interest) and debt service and other contractual obligations; (ii) maintenance capital expenditures; and (iii) to the extent applicable, major scheduled turnaround expenses, reserves for future operating or capital needs that the board of directors of the general partner deems necessary or appropriate, and expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger, if any. Available cash for distribution may be increased by the release of previously established cash reserves, if any, at the discretion of the board of directors of our general partner, and available cash is increased by the business interruption insurance proceeds and the impact of purchase accounting. Actual distributions are set by the board of directors of our general

partner. The boardDecember 31, 2020 | 39


Table of directorsContents
Reconciliation of our general partner may modify ourEBITDA to Available Cash for Distribution
 Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
EBITDA$41,354 $107,488 $84,090 
Non-cash items:
Goodwill impairment40,969 — — 
Current reserves for amounts related to:
Debt service(59,995)(59,997)(59,372)
Maintenance capital expenditures(11,649)(18,247)(14,870)
Common units repurchased(7,076)— — 
Other (reserves for) / releases of amounts reserved for:
Future turnarounds(4,500)— — 
Repayment of current portion of long-term debt(2,240)— — 
Recapture of prior negative available cash(5,917)— — 
Future operating needs(5,308)(28,000)— 
Major scheduled expenditures2,567 — — 
Previously established cash reserves 25,433 — 
Available cash for distribution (1) (2)$(11,795)$26,677 $9,848 
Common units outstanding11,195 11,328 11,328 

(1)Amount represents the cumulative available cash distribution policy at any time, and our partnership agreement does not require us to make distributions at all.

Available cash for distribution is not a recognized term under GAAP. Available cash for distribution should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income (loss) or operating income, or any other measure of financial performance or operating performance. In addition,based on full year results. However, available cash for distribution is not presented as, and should not be considered, an alternative tocalculated quarterly, with distributions (if any) being paid in the period following declaration.
(2)The Partnership paid no cash flows from operations or as a measure of liquidity. Available cashdistributions for distribution as reported by the Partnership may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other entities, thereby limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

A reconciliation of consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to Available cash for distribution is as follows:

 Three Months Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2017 2016 2015
        
 (in millions, except units and per unit data)
Adjusted EBITDA$7.7
 $65.8
 $92.7
 $106.8
Adjustments:       
Less:       
Net cash interest expense (excluding capitalized interest) and debt service(15.0) (59.9) (46.1) (6.0)
Maintenance capital expenditures(3.0) (14.1) (13.7) (9.6)
Major scheduled turnaround expenses
 (2.6) (6.6) (7.0)
Cash reserves for future turnaround expenses
 
 
 (7.9)
Expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger
 
 (3.1) (2.3)
Add:       
Insurance recovery - business interruption
 1.1
 6.1
 
Impact of purchase accounting
 
 13.0
 
Available cash associated with East Dubuque 2016 first quarter
 
 6.3
 
Release of cash reserves established for turnaround expenses
 
 
 7.0
Available cash for distribution$(10.3) $(9.7) $48.6
 $81.0
Distribution declared, per common unit$
 $0.02
 $0.44
 $1.11
Common units outstanding (in thousands)113,283
 113,283
 113,283
 73,128


The following tables show selected information about key operating statistics and market indicators for our business:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Key Operating Statistics:     
Consolidated sales (thousand tons):     
Ammonia286.1
 201.4
 32.3
UAN1,254.5
 1,237.5
 939.5
Consolidated product pricing at gate (dollars per ton) (1):     
Ammonia$280
 $376
 $521
UAN$152
 $177
 $247
Consolidated production volume (thousand tons):     
Ammonia (gross produced) (2)814.7
 693.5
 385.4
Ammonia (net available for sale) (2)267.8
 183.6
 37.3
UAN1,268.4
 1,192.6
 928.6
Feedstock:     
Petroleum coke used in production (thousand tons)487.5
 513.7
 469.9
Petroleum coke used in production (dollars per ton)$17
 $15
 $25
Natural gas used in production (thousands of MMBtu) (3)7,619.5
 5,596.0
 
Natural gas used in production (dollars per MMBtu) (3) (4)$3.24
 $2.96
 $
Natural gas in cost of materials and other (thousands of MMBtu) (3)8,051.5
 4,618.7
 
Natural gas in cost of materials and other (dollars per MMBtu) (3) (4)$3.26
 $2.87
 $
Coffeyville Facility on-stream factors (5):     
Gasification98.5% 96.9% 90.2%
Ammonia97.4% 94.9% 87.5%
UAN91.7% 93.1% 87.3%
East Dubuque Facility on-stream factors (5):     
Ammonia90.4% 87.7% %
UAN90.3% 87.3% %
Market Indicators:     
Ammonia – Southern plains (dollars per ton)$314
 $356
 $510
Ammonia – Corn belt (dollars per ton)$358
 $416
 $566
UAN – Corn belt (dollars per ton)$192
 $208
 $284
Natural gas NYMEX (dollars per MMbtu)$3.02
 $2.55
 $2.63

(1)Product pricing at gate represents net sales less freight revenue divided by product sales volume in tons and is shown in order to provide a pricing measure that is comparable across the fertilizer industry.
(2)Gross tons produced for ammonia represent the total ammonia produced, including ammonia produced that was upgraded into other fertilizer products. Net tons available for sale represent the ammonia available for sale that was not upgraded into other fertilizer products.
(3)The feedstock natural gas shown above does not include natural gas used for fuel. The cost of fuel natural gas is included in direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization).
(4)The cost per MMBtu excludes derivative activity, when applicable. The impact of natural gas derivative activity was not material for the periods presented.
(5)On-stream factor is the total number of hours operated divided by the total number of hours in the reporting period and is included as a measure of operating efficiency.

Coffeyville Facility
The Linde air separation unit experienced a shut down during the secondfourth quarter of 2017. Following2019 or the Linde outage,first three quarters of 2020. No distributions were declared for the Coffeyville Facility UAN unit experienced a number of operational challenges, resulting in approximately 11 days of UAN downtime during the secondfourth quarter of 2017. Excluding the impact of the Linde air separation unit outage at the Coffeyville Facility, the UAN unit on-stream factors at the Coffeyville Facility would have been 94.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
Excluding the impact of the full facility turnaround and the Linde air separation unit outages at the Coffeyville Facility, the on-stream factors for the year ended December 31, 2015 would have been 99.9% for gasifier, 97.7% for ammonia and 97.6% for UAN.
East Dubuque Facility
Excluding the impact of the full facility turnaround at the East Dubuque Facility, the on-stream factors at the East Dubuque Facility would have been 94.2% for ammonia and 94.0% for UAN for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Excluding the impact of the full facility turnaround at the East Dubuque Facility, the on-stream factors at the East Dubuque Facility would have been 97.8% for ammonia and 97.1% for UAN for the post-acquisition period ended December 31, 2016.

Year Ended December 31, 2017 compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2016

The year ended December 31, 2017 is not comparable to the year ended December 31, 2016 due to the acquisition of the East Dubuque Facility on April 1, 2016. Where appropriate, the East Dubuque Facility has been excluded from comparative discussions.

Net Sales.    Consolidated net sales were $330.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $356.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Excluding the East Dubuque Facility, net sales were $195.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $228.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease of $32.5 million was primarily attributable to the lower UAN sales prices ($24.0 million), lower UAN sales volumes ($7.2 million) and lower ammonia sales prices ($4.5 million), partially offset by higher ammonia sales volumes ($6.5 million) at the Coffeyville Facility. For the year ended December 31, 2017, UAN and ammonia made up $170.5 million and $18.4 million of our Coffeyville Facility net sales, respectively, including freight. This compared to UAN and ammonia net sales of $201.7 million and $16.4 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016, including freight.

The following table demonstrates the impact of changes in sales volumes and pricing for the primary components of net sales at the Coffeyville Facility for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016:

  
Price
 Variance
 
Volume
 Variance
     
  (in millions)
UAN $(24.0) $(7.2)
Ammonia $(4.5) $6.5
Hydrogen $(0.2) $(2.6)

The decrease in UAN and ammonia sales prices at the Coffeyville Facility for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily attributable to pricing fluctuation in the market.
Cost of Materials and Other.   Cost of materials and other consists primarily of freight and distribution expenses, feedstock expenses, purchased ammonia and purchased hydrogen. Consolidated cost of materials and other for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $84.9 million, compared to $93.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Excluding the East Dubuque Facility, cost of materials and other was $55.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $57.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease of $2.0 million was attributable to lower costs from transactions with third parties of $6.9 million, partially offset by higher transactions with affiliates of $4.9 million. The decrease in transactions with third parties was primarily the result of decreased distribution costs due to the timing of regulatory

railcar repairs and maintenance ($3.5 million) and a reduction of expenses due to lower UAN sales at the Coffeyville Facility. The increase in transactions with affiliates was primarily the result of increased hydrogen purchases from a subsidiary of CVR Refining ($4.0 million).
Direct Operating Expenses (Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization).    Direct operating expenses consist primarily of energy and utility costs, direct costs of labor, property taxes, plant-related maintenance services, including turnaround, and environmental and safety compliance costs as well as catalyst and chemical costs. Consolidated direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $155.5 million, as compared to $148.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Excluding the East Dubuque Facility, direct operating expenses were $94.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $92.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase of $1.8 million was attributable to higher costs from transactions with third parties of $3.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in transactions with affiliates of $1.2 million. The increase in transactions with third parties was primarily the result of higher utilities ($4.3 million) mostly due to higher electricity prices and also the result of other less significant fluctuations, partially offset by lower repairs and maintenance ($3.2 million).
Depreciation and Amortization Expense.    Consolidated depreciation expense was $74.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to $58.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Excluding the East Dubuque Facility, depreciation expense was $28.2 million and $28.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses include the direct expenses of our business as well as certain expenses incurred by our affiliates, CVR Energy and CRLLC, on our behalf and billed or allocated to us in accordance with the applicable agreement. We also reimburse our general partner in accordance with the partnership agreement for expenses it incurs on our behalf, and such costs are recorded for expenses it incurs on our behalf. Reimbursed expenses to our general partner are included as selling, general and administrative expenses from affiliates. Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses were $25.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Excluding the East Dubuque Facility, selling, general and administrative expenses were $20.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $22.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease of $2.8 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger ($3.1 million).
Interest Expense and Other Financing Costs.    Consolidated interest expense was $62.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to $48.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase of $14.3 million was primarily due to lower outstanding debt in the first quarter of 2016. See Note 10 ("Debt") to Part II, Item 8 of this Report for a discussion of the financing transactions that occurred in the second quarter of 2016.
Net Loss.    For the year ended December 31, 2017, consolidated net loss was $72.8 million, as compared to $26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $45.9 million. The change in net loss was primarily due to the factors noted above.
Year Ended December 31, 2016 compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2015
The year ended December 31, 2016 is not comparable to the year ended December 31, 2015 due to the acquisition of the East Dubuque Facility on April 1, 2016. Where appropriate, the East Dubuque Facility has been excluded from comparative discussions.
Net Sales.    Consolidated net sales were $356.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $289.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Excluding the East Dubuque Facility, net sales were $228.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $289.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease of $60.9 million was attributable to lower UAN sales prices ($69.8 million), lower ammonia sales prices ($7.6 million), and lower hydrogen sales volumes and prices ($6.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively), partially offset by higher UAN sales volumes ($16.8 million) and ammonia sales volumes ($6.8 million) at the Coffeyville Facility. For the year ended December 31, 2016, UAN and ammonia made up $201.7 million and $16.4 million of our Coffeyville Facility net sales, respectively. This compared to UAN and ammonia net sales of $258.8 million and $17.2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The following table demonstrates the impact of changes in sales volumes and pricing for the primary components of net sales at the Coffeyville Facility for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015:

  
Price
 Variance
 
Volume
 Variance
     
  (in millions)
UAN $(69.8) $16.8
Ammonia $(7.6) $6.8
Hydrogen $(1.8) $(6.8)

The decrease in UAN and ammonia sales prices at the Coffeyville Facility for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily attributable to pricing fluctuation in the market. The increase in UAN and ammonia sales volume at the Coffeyville Facility for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily attributable to the lost production during the Q3 2015 Coffeyville Facility major scheduled turnaround. Lower hydrogen needs from CVR Refining resulted in decreased hydrogen sales volume at the Coffeyville Facility for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.
Cost of Materials and Other.    Consolidated cost of materials and other for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $93.7 million, compared to $65.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Excluding the East Dubuque Facility, cost of materials and other was $57.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $65.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease of $8.2 million was attributable to lower costs from transactions with third parties of $4.1 million and affiliates of $4.1 million. The lower third-party costs incurred was primarily the result of less purchased ammonia ($12.6 million), partially offset by higher regulatory railcar repairs ($3.6 million) and freight expenses ($3.2 million). The lower affiliate costs incurred were primarily the result of lower expense of CVR Refining pet coke due to lower affiliate pet coke prices.
Direct Operating Expenses (Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization).    Consolidated direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $148.3 million, as compared to $106.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Excluding the East Dubuque Facility, direct operating expenses were $92.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $106.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease of $13.5 million was primarily due to lower turnaround expenses ($7.0 million), lower utilities ($2.4 million) and other less significant fluctuations. The decrease in turnaround expenses were related to the turnaround during the third quarter of 2015 and the decrease in utilities is primarily the result of lower electrical rates.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense.    Consolidated depreciation expense was $58.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to $28.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase of $29.8 million was primarily attributable to the inclusion of the East Dubuque Facility.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses were $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to $20.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Excluding the East Dubuque Facility, selling, general and administrative expenses were $22.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $20.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase of $2.0 million was primarily attributable to increased expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger ($0.8 million).
Interest Expense and Other Financing Costs.    Consolidated interest expense was $48.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase of $41.6 million was primarily due to the debt assumed in the East Dubuque Merger, the higher interest rate senior term loan credit facility with CRLLC, the increased borrowings and higher interest rate on the 2023 Notes.
Net Income (Loss).    For the year ended December 31, 2016, consolidated net loss was $26.9 million, as compared to $62.0 million of net income for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $88.9 million. The decrease in net income was primarily due to the factors noted above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal source of liquidity has historically been and continues to be cash from operations, which can include cash advances from customers resulting from forward sales.prepay contracts. Our principal uses of cash are for working capital, capital expenditures, funding our debt service obligations, and paying distributions to our unitholders, as further discussed below.
We
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in a significant and swift reduction in U.S. economic activity. These effects have caused significant volatility and disruption of the financial markets, and we have observed adverse impacts to our business and financial performance, of which the nature and extent of such impacts remains uncertain. This period of extreme economic disruption, including business closures in the restaurant and food supply industries, idling of ethanol facilities, and limitations on the availability of the workforce, including farmers in the agricultural industry, may continue to have an impact on our business, results of operations, and access to sources of liquidity. In view of the uncertainty of the depth and extent of the contraction in the U.S. economy and potential impact on the demand for our fertilizer products, we took proactive actions in 2020 to address the impacts we may experience in our results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition, including the following:

The deferment of the Coffeyville Facility turnaround from the fall of 2020 to the summer of 2021, enabled by certain maintenance we proactively performed during the first quarter of 2020, and the East Dubuque Facility turnaround from 2021 to 2022;
A reduction in the amount of maintenance capital expenditures in 2020 to only include those projects which are a priority to support continuing safe and reliable operations, or which we consider are critical to support future activities; and
The amendment of the ABL Credit Agreement extending its term to September 30, 2022, optimizing the borrowing capacity and fee structure, and revising certain provisions to provide an improved credit facility for the Partnership.

December 31, 2020 | 40


Table of Contents
When paired with the actions outlined above and prudently managing our operating costs and capital expenditures in 2021, we believe that our cash from operations and existing cash and cash equivalents, along with borrowings, as necessary, under the ABL Credit Agreement, formerly the AB Credit Facility, will be sufficient to satisfy anticipated cash commitmentsrequirements associated with our existing operations for at least the next 12 months. However, our future capital expenditures and other cash requirements could be higher than we currently expect as a result of various factors. Additionally, our ability to generate sufficient cash from our operating activities and secure additional financing depends on our future performance, which is subject to general economic, political, financial, competitive, and other factors, outsidesome of which may be beyond our control.

Depending on the needs of our business, contractual limitations, and market conditions, we may from time to time seek to issue equity securities, incur additional debt, issue debt securities, or otherwise refinance our existing debt. There can be no assurance that we will seek to do any of the foregoing or that we will be able to do any of the foregoing on terms acceptable to us or at all. For discussion

We do not have any “off-balance sheet arrangements” as such term is defined within the rules and regulations of our cash distribution policy, refer to Note 7 ("Partners’ Capital and Partnership Distributions") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report.the SEC.

Cash Balance and Other Liquidity

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of $49.2$30.6 million, including $12.9$7.6 million of customer advances. Combined with $20.1 million available under our ABL Credit Agreement, we had total liquidity of $50.7 million as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had $55.6$37.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, including $12.6$9.1 million of customer advances.
December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
9.25% Senior Notes, due June 2023$645,000 $645,000 
6.50% Senior Notes, due April 2021, net of current portion (1) 2,240 
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs(11,058)(14,834)
Total long-term debt633,942 632,406 
Current portion of long-term debt (1)2,240 — 
Total long-term debt, including current portion$636,182 $632,406 

(1)The working capital at6.50% Notes, due April 2021, mature within 12 months, and, therefore, the outstanding balance of $2.2 million has been classified as short-term debt as of December 31, 2017 was $62.8 million, consisting of $118.9 million in current assets and $56.1 million in current liabilities. Working capital at December 31, 2016 was $71.5 million, consisting of $134.5 million in current assets and $63.0 million in current liabilities. As of February 20, 2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $59.4 million.2020.
Senior Notes
The Partnership's $645.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.250% Senior Secured Notes due 2023 are guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of the Partnership’s existing subsidiaries.
At any time prior to June 15, 2019, we may on any of one or more occasions redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes issued under the indenture governing the 2023 Notes in an amount not greater than the net proceeds of one or more public equity offerings at a redemption price of 109.250% of the principal amount of the 2023 Notes, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Prior to June 15, 2019, we may on any one or more occasions redeem all or part of the 2023 Notes at a redemption price equal to the sum of: (i) the principal amount thereof, plus (ii) the Make Whole Premium, as defined in the indenture governing the 2023 Notes, at the redemption date, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the applicable redemption date.
On and after June 15, 2019, we may on any one or more occasions redeem all or a part of the 2023 Notes at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the applicable redemption date on such Notes, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on June 15 of the years indicated below:
Year Percentage
2019 104.625%
2020 102.313%
2021 and thereafter 100.000%
Upon the occurrence of certain change of control events as defined in the indenture (including the sale of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of theThe Partnership and its subsidiaries taken were in compliance with all applicable covenants under their respective debt instrumentsas a whole), each holder of the 2023 Notes will have the rightDecember 31, 2020. Refer to require that the Partnership repurchase all or a portion of such holder’s 2023 NotesNote 5 (“Long-Term Debt”) in cash at a purchase price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.
See Note 10 ("Debt") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report for additional information on the 2023 Notes, including a description of the covenants contained therein. We were in compliance with the covenants as of December 31, 2017.further information.

The Partnership also had a nominal principal amount of 6.5% Senior Notes due 2021 (the "2021 Notes") outstanding as of December 31, 2017, which contain substantially no restrictive covenants and are not secured. See Note 10 ("Debt") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report for additional information regarding the 2021 Notes.
Asset Based (ABL) Credit Facility.
The Partnership has an ABL Credit Facility, the proceeds of which may be used to fund capital expenditures and working capital and general corporate purposes of the Partnership and its subsidiaries. The ABL Credit Facility is a senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility with an aggregate principal amount of availability of up to $50.0 million with an incremental facility, which permits an increase in borrowings of up to $25.0 million in the aggregate subject to additional lender commitments and certain other conditions. The ABL Credit Facility matures September 30, 2021.
As of February 20, 2018, the Partnership and its subsidiaries had availability under the ABL Credit Facility of $46.4 million. There were no borrowings outstanding under the ABL Credit Facility as of December 31, 2017. Availability under the ABL Credit Facility was limited by borrowing base conditions. See Note 10 ("Debt") of Part II, Item 8 of this Report for information on the ABL Credit Facility, including a description of the covenants contained therein. We were in compliance with the covenants as of December 31, 2017.
Capital Spending

We divide our capital spending needs into two categories: maintenance and growth. Maintenance capital spending includes only non-discretionary maintenance projects and projects required to comply with environmental, health, and safety regulations. We also treat maintenance capital spending as a reduction of cash available for distribution to unitholders. Growth capital projects generally involve an expansion of existing capacity improvement in product yields, and/or a reduction in direct operating expenses. Major scheduled turnaround expenses are expensed when incurred. We undertake growth capital spending based on the expected return on incremental capital employed.

Our total capital expenditures for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017 was $14.5 million, including $14.1 million2020 and 2019, along with our estimated expenditures for 2021 are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Estimated
(in thousands)202020192021
Maintenance capital$11,651 $18,247 $18,000 - 20,000
Growth capital4,780 2,027 5,000 - 6,000
Total capital expenditures$16,431 $20,274 $23,000 - 26,000

December 31, 2020 | 41


Table of Contents
In light of the changing environment and proactive maintenance performed during several outages at the third-party owned and operated air separation unit at our Coffeyville Facility during the first quarter of 2020, we moved our turnaround from the previously planned timeframe of the fall of 2020 to the fall of 2021, with an estimated cost of $7 to $9 million. We will continue to monitor market conditions and make adjustments, if needed, to our current capital spending and the remainder was for growth capital projects.
Capital spending for our business has been and will be determined by the Board of Directors of our general partner. Our estimated maintenance and growth capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $18 million and $3 million, respectively, for the year ending December 31, 2018.or turnaround plans. Our estimated capital expenditures are subject to adjustmentschange due to unanticipated changes in the cost, scope, and completion time for our capital projects. For example, we may experience unexpected changes in labor or equipment costs necessary to comply with government regulations or to complete projects that sustain or improve the profitability of ourthe nitrogen fertilizer facilities. We may also accelerate or defer some capital expenditures from time to time.
Major Scheduled Turnaround Expenditures
Consistent, safe and reliable operations are critical to our financial performance and results of operations. Unplanned downtime of either plant may result in lost margin opportunity, increased maintenance expense and a temporary increase in working capital investment and related inventory position. The financial impact of planned downtime, such as major turnaround maintenance, is mitigated through a diligent planning process that takes into account margin environment, the availability of resources to perform the needed maintenance, feedstock logistics and other factors.
The East Dubuque Facility underwent scheduled full facility turnarounds during the second quarter of 2016 and during the third quarter of 2017. The Coffeyville Facility underwent a scheduled full facility turnaround during the third quarter of 2015. See "Major Influences on Results of Operations" above for further discussion of turnaround activities.
Distributions to Unitholders

The board of directorscurrent policy of the Partnership's general partner has a policy for the PartnershipBoard is to distribute all available cashAvailable Cash the Partnership generated on a quarterly basis. Available Cash for each quarter will be determined by the Board following the end of such quarter. Available Cash for each quarter is calculated as EBITDA for the quarter excluding non-cash income or expense items (if any), for which adjustment is deemed necessary or appropriate by the Board in its sole discretion, less (i) reserves for maintenance capital expenditures, debt service and other contractual obligations, and (ii) reserves for future operating or capital needs (if any), in each case, that the Board deems necessary or appropriate in its sole discretion. Available cash for distribution may be increased by the release of previously established cash reserves, if any, and other excess cash, at the discretion of the Board.

The Partnership did not pay distributions for the year ended December 31, 2020 or December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership paid distributions totaling $4.00 per common unit on a split-adjusted basis, or $45.3 million. Of these distributions, CVR Energy received $15.6 million.

Capital Structure

On May 6, 2020, the Board, on behalf of the Partnership, authorized a unit repurchase program (the “Unit Repurchase Program”). The Unit Repurchase Program enables the Partnership to repurchase up to $10 million of the Partnership’s common units. Repurchases under the Unit Repurchase Program may be made from time-to-time through open market transactions, block trades, privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise in accordance with applicable securities laws. The timing, price, and amount of repurchases (if any) will be made at the discretion of management of our general partner and are subject to market conditions, as well as corporate, regulatory, and other considerations.

On November 2, 2020, the Partnership announced that the Board had approved a 1-for-10 reverse split of the Partnership’s common units that was completed on November 23, 2020, pursuant to which each ten common units of the Partnership were converted into one common unit of the Partnership (the “Reverse Unit Split”). In accordance with the Partnership’s Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended (the “Partnership Agreement”), following the Reverse Unit Split, any fractional units of record holders were rounded up or down, as applicable, to the nearest whole common unit, with any fraction equal to or above 0.5 common units rounding up to the next higher common unit. Following the Reverse Unit Split, the number of common units outstanding decreased from approximately 111 million common units to approximately 11 million common units, with proportionate adjustments to the common units under the Partnership’s long-term incentive plan and outstanding awards thereunder. See Note 7 ("Partners’ Capital1 (“Organization and Partnership Distributions"Nature of Business”) ofin Part II, Item 8 for a discussion regarding the delisting of this reportthe NYSE.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, on a split-adjusted basis, the Partnership repurchased 623,177 common units on the open market in accordance with a unit repurchase agreement under Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 of the Exchange Act at a cost of $7.1 million, inclusive of transaction costs, or an average price of $11.35 per common unit. At December 31, 2020, the Partnership had $2.9 million in authority remaining under the Unit Repurchase Program. On February 22, 2021, the Board authorized an additional $10 million for additional information on cash distributions paidthe Unit Repurchase Program. This Unit Repurchase Program does not obligate the Partnership to unitholders.acquire any common units and may be cancelled, terminated, extended or increased by the Board at any time.

December 31, 2020 | 42


Table of Contents
Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the periods indicated below:
 Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Net cash provided by (used in):   
Operating activities$19,740 $39,157 $32,234 
Investing activities(18,550)(18,529)(19,631)
Financing activities(7,625)(45,410)— 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents$(6,435)$(24,782)$12,603 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
 (in millions)
Net cash flow provided by (used in):     
Operating activities$10.4
 $45.0
 $78.4
Investing activities(14.5) (87.1) (16.9)
Financing activities(2.3) 47.7
 (91.4)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(6.4) $5.6
 $(29.9)

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
For purposes of this cash flow discussion, we define trade working capital as accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable. Other working capital is defined as all other current assets and liabilities except trade working capital.
NetThe change in net cash flows provided byfrom operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 were approximately $10.4 million. The positive cash flow from operating activities generated over this period was primarily driven by a net loss of $72.8 million, partially offset by non-cash depreciation and amortization of $74.0 million and amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount of $3.0 million. Net cash inflows from trade working capital of $4.3 million positively impacted operating cash flow, partially offset by net cash outflows from other working capital of $3.0 million. The net cash inflow for trade working capital was due2020 as compared to a decrease in accounts receivable of $4.1 million and a decrease in inventory of $2.5 million, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $2.3 million. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily attributable to the normal fluctuations in the timing of payments. The net cash outflow for other working capital was due to a decrease to accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $5.0 million, partially offset by a decrease to prepaid expenses and other current assets of $1.1 million and an increase in deferred revenue of $0.9 million. The decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities was primarily a result of decreases in balances related to the timing of accrued railcar regulatory inspections of $1.8 million and other less significant fluctuations.
Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $45.0 million. The positive cash flow from operating activities generated over this period was2019 is primarily driven by a net loss of $26.9 million, offset by non-cash depreciation and amortization of $58.2 million and amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount of $1.7 million. Net cash inflows from trade working capital of $39.4 million positively impacted operating cash flows, partially offset by net cash outflows from other working capital of $35.6 million. The net cash inflow for trade working capital was due to a decreaseunfavorable changes in inventoryoperating results, excluding non-cash items, of $31.4 million, an increase in accounts payable of $5.8 million and a decrease in accounts receivable of $2.2 million. The Partnership acquired $45.8 million of trade working capital in the East Dubuque Merger, including $49.0 million of the fair value of inventory. Excluding the working capital acquired in the East Dubuque Merger, fluctuations in trade working capital decreased our operating cash flow by $6.4 million due to increases in inventories of $17.6 million and accounts receivable of $6.8$29.9 million, partially offset by an increasefavorable changes in accounts payable of $18.0 million. The increase in inventory, accounts receivable and accounts payable is primarily attributable to the inclusion of East Dubuque amounts as of December 31, 2016. The net cash outflow for other working capital was due to a decrease in deferred revenue of $20.4 million, a decrease to accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $17.5 million, partially offset by a decrease to prepaid expenses and other current assets of $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Partnership acquired $49.4 million of negative other working capital in the East Dubuque Merger, including $29.8 million fair value of deferred revenue. Excluding the working capital acquired in the East Dubuque Merger, fluctuations in other working capital increased operation cash flow by $13.9 million, including an increases of deferred revenue of $9.4 million and accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $7.3 million, partially offset by decreases in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $2.8 million.
Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $78.4 million. The positive cash flow from operating activities generated over this period was primarily driven by net income of $62.0 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization of $28.4 million, partially offset by net cash outflows from trade working capital of $3.6$10.7 million, and net cash outflows from other working capital of $11.5 million. The net cash outflow from trade working capital was due to an increaseunfavorable changes in inventory of $1.9 million, a decrease in accounts payable of $1.6 millionnon-current assets and an increase in accounts receivable of approximately $0.1 million. The net cash outflow from other working capital was due to a decrease in deferred revenue of $10.5 million, a decrease to accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $3.2 million, partially offset by a decrease to$0.2 million.


prepaid expenses and other current assets of approximately $2.2 million. The decrease in deferred revenue was primarily attributable to lower market demand for prepaid contracts for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities was primarily attributable to decreases in balances related to accrued railcar regulatory inspections of $2.6 million due to a larger portion of our fleet due for regulatory inspections and repairs during 2014. The decrease in prepaid expenses was primarily attributable to a decrease in intercompany amounts due from a subsidiary of CVR Refining that include the transfer of hydrogen, the timing of insurance payments and other less significant changes.
Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities
Net cash flows used
The change in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $14.5 million and were the result of capital expenditures. The net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $87.1 million and was the result of cash merger consideration of $63.9 million, net of cash acquired, and capital expenditures of $23.2 million primarily related2020 compared to maintenance capital of $13.7 million, a $7.7 million growth capital project at the East Dubuque Facility and various individually less significant growth projects. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 20152019 was $16.9 million and wasprimarily attributed to the result ofincrease in capital expenditures primarilyof $0.2 million, related to various individually less significant projects.growth spending on the Coffeyville Facility’s urea capacity upgrade project in the current period and maintenance spending on the East Dubuque Facility’s reactor conversion revamp in the prior period, partially offset by a decrease in cash outflows of $0.3 million from the purchase of land during the year ended December 31, 2019with no corresponding amounts paid in 2020, and a decrease in cash inflows of $0.1 million from proceeds on the sale of assets.
Cash Flows Used In
Financing Activities
Net
The change in net cash flows used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $2.3 million and were attributable2020 compared to quarterly cash distributions. The net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 20162019 was the result of $47.7cash distributions paid to unitholders of $45.3 million was primarily attributableduring 2019 compared to cash used for repurchase of common units of $7.1 million and payment of deferred financing costs of $0.4 million related to the financing transactions discussed inABL Credit Agreement amendment entered into during 2020.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger")2 (“Summary of Part II, Item 8 of this Report, partially offset by the quarterly cash distributions of $69.6 million and the purchase of 400,000 CVR Nitrogen common units from CVR Energy for $5.0 million as discussed in Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger") to Part II, Item 8 of this Report. Net cash flows used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $91.4 million and were attributable to quarterly cash distributions.

Capital and Commercial Commitments
We are required to make payments relating to various types of obligations. See Note 13 ("Commitments and Contingencies"Significant Accounting Policies”) in Part II, Item 8 of this Report for more information. The following table summarizes our minimum payments as of December 31, 2017 relating to long-term debt, operating leases, unconditional purchase obligations with third parties and affiliates and interest payments for the five years ending December 31, 2022 and thereafter.
Contractual Obligations
 Payments Due by Period
 Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter
              
 (in millions)
Long-term debt (1)$647.2
 $
 $
 $
 $2.2
 $
 $645.0
Operating leases (2)17.2
 4.4
 3.7
 3.1
 3.0
 2.5
 0.5
Unconditional purchase obligations with third parties (3)45.4
 24.3
 10.7
 3.7
 2.1
 2.1
 2.5
Unconditional purchase obligations with affiliates (4)67.1
 4.5
 4.8
 4.6
 4.6
 4.8
 43.8
Interest payments (5)329.4
 60.0
 60.0
 60.0
 59.9
 59.7
 29.8
Total$1,106.3
 $93.2
 $79.2
 $71.4
 $71.8
 $69.1
 $721.6

(1)Long-term debt included $645.0 million related to the 2023 Notes issued June 10, 2016 and $2.2 million related to the 2021 Notes. Refer to Note 10 ("Debt") to Part II, Item 8 of this Report for further discussion.
(2)We lease various facilities and equipment, primarily railcars, under non-cancelable operating leases for various periods. See Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") to Part II, Item 8 of this Report for a discussion of our railcar leases with affiliates.
(3)The amounts include commitments under a product supply agreement with Linde for the Coffeyville Facility that expires in 2020, a pet coke supply agreement with HollyFrontier Corporation that expires in December 2018, a utility service agreement with Jo-Carroll Energy, Inc. that expires in May 2019, natural gas agreements for the East Dubuque Facility that expire in February 2018 and other less significant commitments.
(4)The amounts include commitments under our long-term pet coke supply agreement with a subsidiary of CVR Refining, having an initial term that ends in 2027, subject to renewal. The Partnership’s purchase obligations for pet coke from a subsidiary of CVR Refining have been derived from a calculation of the average pet coke price paid over the preceding two year period. The amounts also include commitments related to a hydrogen purchase and sale agreement with a subsidiary of CVR Refining, pursuant to which the Partnership agrees to pay a monthly fixed fee. See Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") to Part II, Item 8 of this Report for further discussion of the pet coke agreement and hydrogen purchase and sale agreement.
(5)Interest payments are based on stated interest rates for our long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and also includes commitment fee on the unutilized commitments of the ABL Credit Facility.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, to make distributions, to fund planned capital expenditures and to satisfy our other capital and commercial commitments will depend on our ability to generate cash flow in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to nitrogen fertilizer margins, natural gas prices and general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.
Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and future borrowings may not be available to us under our ABL Credit Facility or future credit facilities, in an amount sufficient to enable us to make quarterly distributions, finance necessary capital expenditures, service our indebtedness or fund our other liquidity needs. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" above for further discussion.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any "off-balance sheet arrangements" as such term is defined within the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 2 ("Summary of Significant Accounting Policies") to Part II, Item 8 of this Report for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements applicable to the Partnership.

Critical Accounting PoliciesEstimates

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. In orderGAAP requiring management to apply these principles, management must make judgments, assumptions, and estimates based on the best available information at the time. Accounting estimates are considered to be critical if (1) the nature of the estimates and assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change; and (2) the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material. Actual results maycould differ from the estimates and assumptions used.

Inventory Valuation

The cost of our fertilizer product inventories is determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Our FIFO inventories are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We compare the estimated realizable value of inventories to their cost by product at each of our facilities. Depending on inventory levels, the per-ton realizable value of our fertilizer products is estimated using pricing on in-transit orders, pricing for open, fixed-price orders that have not shipped, and, if
December 31, 2020 | 43


Table of Contents
volumes remain unaccounted for, current management pricing estimates for fertilizer products. Management’s estimate for current pricing reflects up-to-date pricing in each facility’s market as of the end of each reporting period. Reductions to selling prices for unreimbursed freight costs are included to arrive at net realizable value, as applicable. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized a loss on inventory to reflect net realizable value of $0.7 million. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was no adjustment. Due to the amount and variability in volume of fertilizer product inventories maintained, changes in production costs, and the volatility of market pricing for fertilizer products, losses recognized to reflect fertilizer product inventories at the lower of cost or net realizable value could have a material impact on the Partnership’s results of operations.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets and Goodwill

Long-lived assets used in operations are assessed for impairment whenever changes in facts and circumstances indicate a possible significant deterioration in future expected cash flows. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows of an asset group is less than the carrying value, including applicable liabilities, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. Individual assets are grouped for impairment purposes based on the accuracya judgmental assessment of the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets (for example, at a fertilizer facility level).

The Partnership tests goodwill for impairment annually on November 1 of each year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the asset might be impaired. One of our reporting units, the Coffeyville Facility, had a goodwill balance of $41.0 million at December 31, 2019. During the second quarter of 2020, following completion of the spring planting season, the market pricing for ammonia and UAN, which are the facility’s two primary products, experienced significant pricing declines driven by updated market expectations around supply and demand fundamentals which were expected to continue into the second half of 2020. Additionally, significant uncertainty remained as to the nature and extent of impacts to be seen on the overall demand for corn and soybean given reduced ethanol production and broader economic conditions which had negatively impacted demand. Therefore, in connection with the preparation of the financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2020, given the pricing declines experienced in the second quarter of 2020, further muting of our near-term economic recovery assumptions, including management’s revised forecasts for product pricing in 2020 and beyond, and market price performance of our common units, we concluded an impairment indicator was present and a triggering event under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, had occurred as of June 30, 2020 and an interim quantitative impairment assessment was performed. Significant assumptions inherent in the valuation methodologies for goodwill included, but are not limited to, prospective financial information, utilizedgrowth rates, discount rates, inflationary factors, and subsequent events. Our critical accounting policies, listed below, could materially affectcost of capital. Based on the amountsinterim quantitative analysis, it was determined that the estimated fair value of the Coffeyville Facility reporting unit did not exceed its carrying value. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $41.0 million during 2020. There is no goodwill remaining as of December 31, 2020.

We performed our annual impairment reviews of goodwill for 2019 and 2018, on November 1 of each such year and concluded no impairments. For the period ended December 31, 2019, we performed a qualitative assessment and concluded there were no events or circumstances which would trigger the performance of a quantitative analysis after reviewing all factors impacting the Coffeyville Facility reporting unit, including improved market conditions and financial results in our consolidated2019 as compared to the financial statements.
Estimated livesforecasts from those used in computing depreciation for property, plant and equipmentthe fair value analysis at December 31, 2018, where the estimated fair value of the Coffeyville Facility reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 36% based upon the results of our quantitative goodwill impairment test.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Goodwill impairment
Revenue recognition
Allocation of costs
Share-based compensation

Refer to Note 2 ("Summary of Significant Accounting Policies") to Part II, Item 8 of this Report for a discussion of these accounting policies.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Commodity Price Foreign Currency Exchange and Non-Operating RisksRisk

We are exposed to significant market risk due to potential changes in prices for fertilizer products and natural gas. Natural gas is the primary raw material used in the production of various nitrogen-based products manufactured at our East Dubuque Facility. We have commitments to purchase natural gas for use in our East Dubuque Facility onat the spot market and through short-term, fixed supply, fixed price, and index price purchase contracts. Natural gas prices have fluctuated during the last decade, increasing substantially in 2008 and subsequently declining to the current lower pricing levels.

In the normal course of business, we produce nitrogen-based fertilizer products throughout the year to supply the needs of our customers during the high-delivery-volume spring and fall seasons. The value of fertilizer product inventory is subject to
December 31, 2020 | 44


Table of Contents
market risk due to fluctuations in the relevant commodity prices. Prices of nitrogen fertilizer products can be volatile. We believe that market prices of nitrogen products are affected by changes in grain prices and demand, natural gas prices, and other factors. In the opinion of our management, there is no derivative financial instrument that correlates effectively with, and has a trading volume sufficient to hedge, our firm commitments and forecasted commodity sales transactions.
We do not currently use derivative financial instruments to manage risks related to changes in prices
December 31, 2020 | 45


Table of commodities (e.g., UAN, ammonia, natural gas or pet coke), except as noted above. Given that our business is currently based entirely in the United States, we are not directly exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk. We do not engage in activities that expose us to speculative or non-operating risks, including derivative trading activities. Our management may, in the future, elect to use derivative financial instruments consistent with our overall business objectives to avoid unnecessary risk and to limit, to the extent practical, risks associated with our operating activities.Contents


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Audited Financial Statements
Page
Number

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors of CVR GP, LLC
The Unitholders of CVR Partners, LP
The General Partner of CVR Partners, LP:

Opinion on the financial statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CVR Partners, LP (a Delaware limited partnership) and subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated February 22, 201823, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures includeincluded examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Goodwill Impairment Assessment

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, annually or as facts or circumstances may dictate, management performs a valuation of the Coffeyville Facility reporting unit to determine if a goodwill impairment exists. During the second quarter of 2020 following the completion of the spring planting season and observation of certain market and other conditions described in Note 2, the Partnership concluded a triggering event occurred and performed an interim quantitative impairment assessment. The identification of a triggering event and the determination of the fair value of the reporting unit required management to make significant estimates and develop assumptions related to cash flow forecasts using estimates of future nitrogen fertilizer product pricing, volumes to be sold, costs to be incurred for key process inputs and other operating expenses
December 31, 2020 | 46


Table of Contents
as well as estimating appropriate discount rates and growth rates for future periods. Changes in these assumptions could have had a significant impact on the identification of a triggering event as well as the reporting unit’s estimated fair value. As a result of the quantitative impairment assessment, a full goodwill impairment of $41.0 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020.

We identified the goodwill impairment assessment of the Coffeyville Facility reporting unit as a critical audit matter. The principal consideration for our determination that the goodwill impairment assessment is a critical audit matter was the degree of complexity and subjectivity inherent in determining management’s estimates.

Our audit procedures related to the Coffeyville Facility reporting unit’s goodwill impairment assessment included the following, among others:
We tested the design and operating effectiveness of management’s processes and controls over the identification of a triggering event and the fair value assessment of the Coffeyville reporting unit.
We evaluated the reasonableness of a triggering event by considering the current market conditions following the completion of the spring planting season as well as the economic uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.
We evaluated the reasonableness of future nitrogen fertilizer pricing assumptions by comparing the prices used by management to current industry and economic trends considering the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as comparing those prices to the historical performance of the Coffeyville reporting unit, performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the change in the fair value estimates that would result from changes in those price assumptions, and recalculated management’s estimates.
We compared forecasted sales volumes and expenses to historical operating results.
We utilized valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge to assist in evaluating the Coffeyville Facility’s discounted cash flow model and guideline public company methods and certain significant assumptions, including the discount rate, terminal growth rate, and cost of capital.
We evaluated whether the assumptions used were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

We have served as the Partnership’s auditor since 2013.
Kansas City, Missouri
Houston, Texas
February 22, 201823, 2021



December 31, 2020 | 47


Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors of CVR GP, LLC
The Unitholders of CVR Partners, LP
The General Partner of CVR Partners, LP:
Opinion on internal control over financial reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of CVR Partners, LP (a Delaware limited partnership) and subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"(“COSO”). In our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Partnership as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, and our report dated February 22, 201823, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for opinion
The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Kansas City, MissouriHouston, Texas
February 22, 201823, 2021



December 31, 2020 | 48


Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
ASSETS
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$30,559 $36,994 
Accounts receivable36,896 34,264 
Inventories42,349 48,296 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets8,410 5,406 
Total current assets118,214 124,960 
Property, plant, and equipment, net897,847 951,959 
Goodwill0 40,969 
Other long-term assets16,819 20,067 
Total assets$1,032,880 $1,137,955 
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Current liabilities:  
Current portion of long-term debt$2,240 $
Accounts payable19,544 21,069 
Accounts payable to affiliates5,217 2,578 
Deferred revenue30,631 27,841 
Other current liabilities18,709 24,043 
Total current liabilities76,341 75,531 
Long-term liabilities:  
Long-term debt, net of current portion633,942 632,406 
Other long-term liabilities8,356 10,474 
Total long-term liabilities642,298 642,880 
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 8)00
Partners’ capital:  
Common unitholders, 10,705,710 and 11,328,297 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively314,240 419,543 
General partner interest1 
Total partners’ capital314,241 419,544 
Total liabilities and partners’ capital$1,032,880 $1,137,955 
 December 31,
 2017 2016
    
 (in thousands, except unit data)
ASSETS
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$49,173
 $55,595
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $28 and $46, at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively9,855
 13,924
Inventories54,097
 58,167
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, including $315 and $750 from affiliates at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively5,793
 6,845
Total current assets118,918
 134,531
Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation1,069,526
 1,130,121
Goodwill40,969
 40,969
Other long-term assets, including $598 with affiliates at December 31, 20164,863
 6,596
Total assets$1,234,276
 $1,312,217
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable, including $2,223 and $2,402 due to affiliates at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively$23,518
 $28,815
Personnel accruals, including $1,521 and $1,968 with affiliates at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively8,240
 9,256
Deferred revenue12,895
 12,571
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, including $3,221 and $2,515 with affiliates at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively11,442
 12,374
Total current liabilities56,095
 63,016
Long-term liabilities:   
Long-term debt, net of current portion625,904
 623,107
Other long-term liabilities2,424
 1,187
Total long-term liabilities628,328
 624,294
Commitments and contingencies
 
Partners' capital:   
Common unitholders, 113,282,973 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively549,852
 624,906
General partner interest1
 1
Total partners' capital549,853
 624,907
Total liabilities and partners' capital$1,234,276
 $1,312,217

See
The accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


December 31, 2020 | 49


Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per unit data)202020192018
Net sales$349,953 $404,177 $351,082 
Operating costs and expenses:   
Cost of materials and other91,117 94,103 88,461 
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)157,916 173,629 159,319 
Depreciation and amortization76,077 79,839 71,575 
Cost of sales325,110 347,571 319,355 
Selling, general and administrative expenses18,174 25,829 25,023 
Loss on asset disposals582 3,397 390 
Goodwill impairment40,969 
Operating (loss) income(34,882)27,380 6,314 
Other (expense) income:   
Interest expense, net(63,428)(62,636)(62,588)
Other income, net159 269 6,201 
Loss before income taxes(98,151)(34,987)(50,073)
Income tax expense (benefit)30 (18)(46)
Net loss$(98,181)$(34,969)$(50,027)
  
Net loss per common unit - basic and diluted$(8.77)$(3.09)$(4.42)
Distributions declared per common unit0 4.00 
Weighted-average common units outstanding:   
Basic and Diluted11,195 11,328 11,328 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
 (in thousands, except per unit data)
Net sales$330,802
 $356,284
 $289,194
Operating costs and expenses:     
Cost of materials and other - Affiliates7,473
 2,645
 6,701
Cost of materials and other - Third parties77,401
 91,148
 58,488
 84,874
 93,793
 65,189
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) - Affiliates3,877
 4,225
 4,093
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) - Third parties151,653
 144,043
 101,963
 155,530
 148,268
 106,056
Depreciation and amortization73,986
 58,246
 28,452
Cost of sales314,390
 300,307
 199,697
      
Selling, general and administrative expenses - Affiliates15,615
 14,989
 13,961
Selling, general and administrative expenses - Third parties10,015
 14,287
 6,807
 25,630
 29,276
 20,768
Total operating costs and expenses340,020
 329,583
 220,465
Operating income (loss)(9,218) 26,701
 68,729
Other income (expense):     
Interest expense and other financing costs(62,895) (48,557) (6,880)
Interest income50
 6
 40
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (4,862) 
Other income (expense), net(505) 103
 164
Total other expense(63,350) (53,310) (6,676)
Income (loss) before income tax expense(72,568) (26,609) 62,053
Income tax expense220
 329
 11
Net income (loss)$(72,788) $(26,938) $62,042
  
  
 

Net income (loss) per common unit - basic$(0.64) $(0.26) $0.85
Net income (loss) per common unit - diluted$(0.64) $(0.26) $0.85
Weighted-average common units outstanding: 
  
  
Basic113,283
 103,299
 73,123
Diluted113,283
 103,299
 73,131

SeeThe accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


December 31, 2020 | 50


Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
 (in thousands)
Net income (loss)$(72,788) $(26,938) $62,042
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps
 
 (137)
Net loss reclassified into income on settlement of interest rate swaps
 119
 1,056
Other comprehensive income
 119
 919
Total comprehensive income (loss)$(72,788) $(26,819) $62,961
(in thousands, except unit data)Common Units
General
Partner
Interest
Total Partners Capital

Issued
Amount
Balance at December 31, 201711,328,297 $549,852 $$549,853 
Net loss— (50,027)— (50,027)
Balance at December 31, 201811,328,297 499,825 499,826 
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Affiliates— (15,568)— (15,568)
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Non-affiliates— (29,745)— (29,745)
Net loss— (34,969)— (34,969)
Balance at December 31, 201911,328,297 419,543 419,544 
Net loss (98,181) (98,181)
Repurchase of common units(623,177)(7,076) (7,076)
Fractional unit impact of reverse unit split590    
Other (46) (46)
Balance at December 31, 202010,705,710 $314,240 $1 $314,241 
See

The accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


December 31, 2020 | 51


Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
 Common Units        
 

Issued
 Amount 
General
Partner
Interest
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income/(Loss)
 Noncontrolling Interest Total
            
 (in thousands, except unit data)
Balance at December 31, 201473,122,997
 $414,968
 $1
 $(1,038) $
 $413,931
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Affiliates
 (48,650) 
 
 
 (48,650)
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Non-affiliates
 (42,754) 
 
 
 (42,754)
Share-based compensation – Affiliates
 83
 
 
 
 83
Issuance of units under LTIP – Affiliates           7,707
 
 
 
 
 
Redemption of common units(2,435) (19) 
 
 
 (19)
Net income
 62,042
 
 
 
 62,042
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 919
 
 919
Balance at December 31, 201573,128,269
 $385,670
 $1
 $(119) $
 $385,552
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Affiliates
 (27,633) 
 
 
 (27,633)
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Non-affiliates
 (41,956) 
 
 
 (41,956)
Share-based compensation – Affiliates
 (1) 
 
 
 (1)
Issuance of common units for the merger consideration40,154,704
 335,693
 
 
 
 335,693
Noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 4,564
 4,564
Contribution from affiliates
 
 
 
 507
 507
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
 71
 
 
 (5,071) (5,000)
Net loss
 (26,938) 
 
 
 (26,938)
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 119
 
 119
Balance at December 31, 2016113,282,973
 $624,906
 $1
 $
 $
 $624,907
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Affiliates
 (778) 
 
 
 (778)
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Non-affiliates
 (1,488) 
 
 
 (1,488)
Net loss
 (72,788) 
 
 
 (72,788)
Balance at December 31, 2017113,282,973
 $549,852
 $1
 $
 $
 $549,853
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net loss$(98,181)$(34,969)$(50,027)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization76,077 79,839 71,575 
Amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount4,049 3,666 3,333 
Goodwill impairment40,969 
Loss on asset disposals582 3,397 390 
Share-based compensation1,035 3,445 3,017 
Other adjustments964 (5)1,690 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable2,892 936 (6,698)
Inventories538 9,914 (8,670)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(4,514)1,582 (1,196)
Accounts payable(1,635)(8,077)5,215 
Deferred revenue(1,612)(14,575)10,828 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities(1,726)(6,542)1,367 
Other long-term assets and liabilities302 546 1,410 
Net cash provided by operating activities19,740 39,157 32,234 
Cash flows from investing activities:   
Capital expenditures(18,598)(18,656)(19,806)
Proceeds from the sale of assets48 127 175 
Net cash used in investing activities(18,550)(18,529)(19,631)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repurchase of common units(7,076)
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Affiliates0 (15,568)
Cash distribution to common unitholders – Non-affiliates0 (29,745)
Payment of deferred financing costs(448)
Other financing activities(101)(97)
Net cash used in financing activities(7,625)(45,410)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(6,435)(24,782)12,603 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period36,994 61,776 49,173 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$30,559 $36,994 $61,776 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
 (in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income (loss)$(72,788) $(26,938) $62,042
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization73,986
 58,246
 28,452
Allowance for doubtful accounts(18) 19
 (7)
Amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount3,046
 1,746
 964
Amortization of debt fair value adjustment
 1,250
 
Loss on disposition of assets70
 148
 38
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 4,862
 
Share-based compensation – Affiliates2,507
 1,846
 1,990
Share-based compensation514
 940
 357
Change in assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable4,087
 2,185
 (44)
Inventories2,502
 31,426
 (1,915)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets1,052
 2,410
 2,133
Other long-term assets1,051
 (1,383) (301)
Accounts payable(2,315) 5,794
 (1,609)
Deferred revenue904
 (20,395) (10,484)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities(4,969) (17,501) (3,193)
Other long-term liabilities771
 314
 (2)
Net cash provided by operating activities10,400
 44,969
 78,421
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Capital expenditures(14,556) (23,231) (17,023)
Acquisition of CVR Nitrogen, LP, net of cash acquired
 (63,869) 
Proceeds from sale of assets
 
 78
Net cash used in investing activities(14,556) (87,100) (16,945)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Principal and premium payments on 2021 Notes
 (322,240) 
Principal payment on CRLLC Facility
 (300,000) 
Principal payments on long-term debt
 (125,000) 
Payment of revolving debt
 (49,100) 
Payment of financing costs
 (10,688) 
Proceeds on issuance of 2023 Notes, net of original issue discount
 628,869
 
Proceeds on CRLLC Facility
 300,000
 
Contribution from affiliate
 507
 
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Affiliates(778) (27,633) (48,650)
Cash distribution to common unitholders – Non-affiliates(1,488) (41,956) (42,754)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
 (5,000) 
Redemption of common units
 
 (19)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(2,266) 47,759
 (91,423)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(6,422) 5,628
 (29,947)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period55,595
 49,967
 79,914
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$49,173
 $55,595
 $49,967



 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
 (in thousands)
Supplemental disclosures:     
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds (received)$(195) $14
 $35
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest of $189, $454 and $9 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively$59,809
 $53,110
 $5,916
Non-cash investing and financing activities:     
Construction in progress additions included in accounts payable$889
 $3,871
 $1,030
Change in accounts payable related to construction in progress additions$(2,982) $(1,134) $(36)
Reduction of proceeds from 2023 Notes from original issue discount$
 $16,131
 $
Fair value of common units issued in a business combination$
 $335,693
 $
Fair value of debt assumed in a business combination$
 $367,500
 $
SeeThe accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

December 31, 2020 | 52


Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Organization and Nature of Business

CVR Partners, LP (referred to as "CVR Partners"(“CVR Partners” or the "Partnership"“Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed by CVR Energy, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, but excluding the Partnership and its subsidiaries, "CVR Energy"“CVR Energy”) to own, operate and grow its nitrogen fertilizer business.
The Partnership produces nitrogen fertilizer products at 2 manufacturing facilities, which are located in Coffeyville, Kansas (the “Coffeyville Facility”) and East Dubuque, Illinois (the “East Dubuque Facility”). Both facilities manufacture ammonia and are able to further upgrade to other nitrogen fertilizer products, principally urea ammonium nitrate (“UAN”). Nitrogen fertilizer is used by farmers to improve the yield and quality of their crops, primarily corn and wheat. The Partnership principally produces ammonia and urea ammonium nitrate ("UAN"), an aqueous solution of urea and ammonium nitrate. The Partnership's product salesPartnership’s products are sold on a wholesale basis in the United States of America. As used in these financial statements, references to CVR Partners, the Partnership, “we”, “us”, and “our” may refer to consolidated subsidiaries of CVR Partners or one or both of the facilities, as the context may require.

NYSE Listing Requirements and Reverse Unit Split

The Partnership produces nitrogen fertilizer products at two manufacturing facilities, whichPartnership’s common units are located in Coffeyville, Kansaslisted on the New York Stock Exchange (the "Coffeyville Facility"“NYSE”) and East Dubuque, Illinois (the "East Dubuque Facility").under the symbol “UAN.” On April 20, 2020, the average closing price of the Partnership’s common units over a 30 consecutive trading-day period fell below $1.00 per common unit, resulting in noncompliance with the continued listing standards in Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The Partnership received written notification of this noncompliance from the NYSE on April 22, 2020, and had until January 1, 2016,2021 to regain compliance or be subject to the NYSE’s suspension and delisting procedures.

On November 2, 2020, the Partnership announced that the board of directors of its general partner (the “Board”) had approved a 1-for-10 reverse split of the Partnership’s common units that was completed the merger (the "East Dubuque Merger") with CVR Nitrogen, LP (formerly known as East Dubuque Nitrogen Partners, L.P. and also formerly known as Rentech Nitrogen Partners, L.P.) ("CVR Nitrogen") and with CVR Nitrogen GP, LLC (formerly known as East Dubuque Nitrogen GP, LLC and also formerly known as Rentech Nitrogen GP, LLC) ("CVR Nitrogen GP"), wherebyon November 23, 2020, pursuant to which each ten common units of the Partnership acquiredwere converted into one common unit of the East Dubuque Facility. See Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger"Partnership (the “Reverse Unit Split”) for further discussion.. In accordance with the Partnership’s Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended (the “Partnership Agreement”), following the Reverse Unit Split, any fractional units of record holders were rounded up or down, as applicable, to the nearest whole common unit, with any fraction equal to or above 0.5 common units rounding up to the next higher common unit. Following the Reverse Unit Split, the number of common units outstanding decreased from approximately 111 million common units to approximately 11 million common units, with proportionate adjustments to the common units under the Partnership’s long-term incentive plan and outstanding awards thereunder.

The Partnership's subsidiaries include Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers, LLC ("CRNF"), which ownsPartnership’s common units began trading on a split-adjusted basis when markets opened on November 24, 2020, under the symbol “UAN” and operatesa new CUSIP number. As of November 30, 2020, the Coffeyville Facility,Reverse Unit Split enabled the Partnership to regain compliance with NYSE listing requirements ahead of the January 1, 2021 deadline. All references to common units and East Dubuque Nitrogen Fertilizers, LLC ("EDNF"), which ownsper unit amounts in the consolidated financial statements and operatesnotes related thereto have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the East Dubuque Facility. Both facilities manufacture ammonia and are able to further upgrade to other nitrogen fertilizer products, principally UAN.effect of the Reverse Unit Split for all periods presented.
Immediately subsequent to the East Dubuque Merger and as
Interest Holders

As of December 31, 2017 and 20162020, public securitycommon unit holders held approximately 66%64% of the Partnership'sPartnership’s outstanding limited partner interests andinterests; CVR Services, LLC (“CVR Services”) (formerly Coffeyville Resources, LLC ("CRLLC")LLC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Energy, held approximately 34%36% of the Partnership'sPartnership’s outstanding limited partner interestsinterests; and CVR GP, LLC (“CVR GP” or the “general partner”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CVR Energy, held 100% of the noneconomicPartnership’s general partner interest. Prior to the East Dubuque Merger public security holders held approximately 47% of the Partnership's outstanding limited partner interests and CRLLC held approximately 53% of the Partnership's outstanding limited partner interests and 100% of the noneconomic general partner interest.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020, Icahn Enterprises L.P. ("IEP"(“IEP”) and its affiliates owned approximately 82%71% of the sharescommon stock of CVR Energy.

Unit Repurchase Program

On May 6, 2020, the Board, on behalf of the Partnership, authorized a unit repurchase program (the “Unit Repurchase Program”). The Unit Repurchase Program enables the Partnership to repurchase up to $10 million of the Partnership’s common units. Repurchases under the Unit Repurchase Program may be made from time-to-time through open market transactions, block trades, privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise in accordance with applicable securities laws. The timing, price, and amount of repurchases (if any) will be made at the discretion of management of our general partner and are subject to market conditions, as well as corporate, regulatory, and other considerations. During the year ended December 31, 2020, adjusted to reflect the impact of the Reverse Unit Split, the Partnership repurchased 623,177 common units on the open market
December 31, 2020 | 53


Table of Contents
CVR Partners, LP and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

in accordance with a repurchase agreement under Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 of the Exchange Act at a cost of $7.1 million, inclusive of transaction costs, or an average price of $11.35 per common unit. At December 31, 2020, the Partnership had $2.9 million in authority remaining under the Unit Repurchase Program. On February 22, 2021, the Board authorized an additional $10 million for the Unit Repurchase Program. This Unit Repurchase Program does not obligate the Partnership to acquire any common units and may be cancelled or terminated by the Board at any time.

Management and Operations

The Partnership, including CVR GP, LLC ("is led by the Board, and its committees and managed by the general partner’s executive officers, CVR GP" orServices (as sole member of the "general partner"general partner), and certain officers of CVR Energy and its subsidiaries, pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, as well as a number of agreements between the Partnership, CVR GP, CVR Energy, and certain of their respective subsidiaries, including a service agreement. See Note 9 (“Related Party Transactions”) manages and operates the Partnership.for further discussion. Common unitholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting the Partnership. In addition, common unitholdersPartnership and have no right to elect the general partner'spartner’s directors or officers, whether on an annual or continuing basis.basis or otherwise.

Subsequent Events

The Partnership is operated by a combination ofevaluated subsequent events, if any, that would require an adjustment to the general partner's senior management team and CVR Energy's senior management team pursuant to a services agreement among CVR Energy, CVR GP and the Partnership. The various rights and responsibilities of the Partnership's partners are set forthPartnership’s consolidated financial statements or require disclosure in the Partnership's limited partnership agreement. The Partnership also is partynotes to a numberthe consolidated financial statements through the date of agreements with CVR Energy and its subsidiaries, including CVR GP,issuance of these consolidated financial statements. Where applicable, the notes to regulate certain business relations between the Partnership and the other parties thereto. See Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") for further discussion.these consolidated financial statements have been updated to discuss all significant subsequent events which have occurred.

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Partnership consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"(“GAAP”) and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"(“SEC”), include the accounts of CVR Partners and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminatedeliminated.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made within the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 to conform with current presentation. Catalyst inventory with a value of $5.6 million as of December 31, 2019 was reclassified in consolidation.the first quarter of 2020 to Other long-term assets to conform to current presentation.

Use of Estimates

The consolidated financial statements have beenare prepared in conformity with GAAP, using management's bestwhich requires management to make estimates and judgments where appropriate. These estimates and judgmentsassumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the

70

CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. ActualEstimates are reviewed on an ongoing basis, based on currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results could differ materially from these estimates and judgments.those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Partnership considers all
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and on deposit, investments in highly liquid money market accounts, and debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Under the Partnership's cash management system, checks issued but not presented to banks frequently result in book overdraft balances for accounting purposes and are classified within accounts payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in book overdrafts are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a component of operating cash flows for accounts payable as they do not represent bank overdrafts. The amount of these checks included in accounts payable as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2.9 million and $5.8 million, respectively.less.

Accounts Receivable, net

Accounts receivable, net primarily consist of customer accounts receivable recorded at the invoiced amounts and generally do not bear interest. Also included within Accounts Receivable are unbilled fixed price contracts which is discussed further within Note 6 (“Revenue”).

December 31, 2020 | 54


Table of Contents
CVR Partners, grants credit to its customers. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of a customer's financial condition; generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable are due on negotiated termsLP and are stated at amounts due from customers, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts outstanding longer than their contractual payment terms are considered past due. CVR Partners determines its allowanceSubsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Allowances for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, includingare generally recorded when it becomes probable the length of time trade accounts are past due, the customer's abilityreceivable will not be collected and is booked to pay its obligations to CVR Partners, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. CVR Partners writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts. Amounts collected on accounts receivable are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. At December 31, 2017, one customer individually represented greater than 10% of the total net accounts receivable balance.bad debt expense. The largest concentration of credit for any one customer was approximately 20% and 18% of the net accounts receivable balance at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019, respectively. Bad debt expense was approximately 16%$0.1 million and 9%, respectively,$0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. A recovery was recognized during the year ended 2018 of the total accounts receivable balance.$1.1 million related to bad debt expense previously written off.

Inventories

Inventories consist of fertilizer products which are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out ("FIFO")FIFO cost, or net realizable value. Inventories also include raw materials precious metals,(primarily gauze, natural gas, and pet coke) and parts and supplies whichthat are valued at the lower of moving-average cost, which approximates FIFO, or net realizable value. The cost of inventories includes inbound freight costs.

Inventories consisted of the following:
 December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Finished goods$9,815 $17,612 
Raw materials152 243 
Parts, supplies and other32,382 30,441 
   Total Inventories$42,349 $48,296 

At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, inventories on the Consolidated Balance Sheets included depreciation of approximately $3.5$2.0 million and $4.1$4.5 million, respectively.

Property, Plant and Equipment, net

Additions to property, plant and equipment, including capitalized interest and certain costs allocable to construction and property purchases, are recorded at cost. Capitalized interest is added to any capital project over $1.0 million in costs which is expected to take more than six months to complete.Expenditures for improvements that increase economic benefit or returns and/or extend useful life are capitalized. Depreciation is computed using principally the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of depreciable assets. The lives used in computing depreciation for such assetssignificant asset classes are as follows:
Asset
Range of Useful
Lives, in Years
Improvements to landLand and improvements30
Buildings2010 to 30
MachineryBuildings and improvements3 to 30
Automotive equipment5 to 30
AutomotiveMachinery and equipment52 to 30
Furniture and fixturesOther3 to 710

Property, plant and equipment, net consisted of the following:
December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Machinery and equipment$1,388,735 $1,378,651 
Buildings and improvements17,598 17,221 
Automotive equipment16,608 16,691 
Land and improvements14,132 14,075 
Construction in progress12,098 5,198 
Other1,721 1,752 
1,450,892 1,433,588 
Less: Accumulated depreciation553,045 481,629 
     Total Property, plant and equipment, net$897,847 $951,959 

Railcars25 to 30
December 31, 2020 | 55


Table of Contents
CVR Partners, LP and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Leasehold improvements and assets held under finance leases are depreciated or amortized on the straight-line method over the shorter of the contractual lease term or the estimated useful life.life of the asset. Expenditures for routine maintenance and repair costs are expensed when incurred, and suchincurred. Such expenses are reported in directDirect operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) in the Partnership'sPartnership’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.


71

TableAs of ContentsDecember 31, 2020, the Partnership had not identified the existence of an impairment indicator for our long-lived asset groups as outlined under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)Leases



At inception, the Partnership determines whether an arrangement is a lease and the appropriate lease classification. Operating leases are included as operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets within Other long-term assets and lease liabilities within Other current liabilities and Other long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Finance leases are included as ROU finance leases within Property, plant, and equipment, net, and finance lease liabilities within Other current liabilities and Long-term debt, net of current portion on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Leases with an initial expected term of 12 months or less are considered short-term and are not recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Partnership recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.
Goodwill
Goodwill representsROU assets represent the excessPartnership’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of minimum lease payments over the lease term. The lease term is modified to reflect options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain we will exercise such option. The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements is limited by the expected lease term, unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise, in which case the depreciation policy in the “Property, Plant and Equipment, net” section above is applicable. The periodic lease payments are treated as payments of the costlease obligation and interest is recorded as interest expense.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

Long-lived assets used in operations are assessed for impairment whenever changes in facts and circumstances indicate a possible significant deterioration in future expected cash flows. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows of an acquired entity overasset group is less than the carrying value, including applicable liabilities, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair valuevalue. Individual assets are grouped for impairment purposes based on a judgmental assessment of the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets acquired less liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested(for example, at a fertilizer facility level).

The Partnership tests goodwill for impairment annually impairment annually on November 1 of each year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the asset might be impaired. The Partnership uses November 1 of each year as its annual valuation date for its goodwill impairment test. See Note 8 ("Goodwill") for further discussion.
Deferred Financing Costs
The lender and other third-party costs associated with debt issuances are deferred and amortized to interest expense and other financing costs using the effective-interest method over the lifeOne of the debt. Deferred financing costs related to line-of-credit arrangements are amortized usingPartnership’s reporting units, the straight-line method through the termination dateCoffeyville Facility, had a goodwill balance of the facility.
Planned Major Maintenance Costs
The direct-expense method of accounting is used for maintenance activities, including planned major maintenance activities and other less extensive shutdowns. Maintenance costs are recognized as expense when maintenance services are performed. Planned major maintenance activities generally occur every two to three years. Costs associated with major scheduled turnarounds are included in direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Overall results were also negatively impacted due to the lost production during the downtime that resulted in reduced sales, partially offset by certain reduced variable expenses included in cost of materials and other and direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization).
The East Dubuque Facility completed a 14-day major scheduled turnaround in the third quarter of 2017 and a 28-day major scheduled turnaround during$41.0 million at December 31, 2019. During the second quarter of 2016 at a cost of approximately $2.6 million and $6.6 million, respectively, exclusive2020, following completion of the impacts due tospring planting season, the lost production.
The Coffeyville Facility completed a major scheduled turnaround during the third quarter of 2015 and the gasifier,market pricing for ammonia and UAN, which are the facility’s 2 primary products, experienced significant pricing declines driven by updated market expectations around supply and demand fundamentals which were expected to continue into the second half of 2020. Additionally, significant uncertainty remained as to the nature and extent of impacts to be seen on the overall demand for corn and soybean given reduced ethanol production and broader economic conditions which had negatively impacted demand. Therefore, in connection with the preparation of the financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2020, given the pricing declines experienced in the second quarter of 2020, further muting of the Partnership’s near-term economic recovery assumptions, including revised forecasts for product pricing in 2020 and beyond, and market price performance of the Partnership’s common units, were downthe Partnership concluded an impairment indicator was present and a triggering event under ASC Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, had occurred as of June 30, 2020 and an interim quantitative impairment assessment was performed. Significant assumptions inherent in the valuation methodologies for between 17goodwill included, but are not limited to, prospective financial information, growth rates, discount rates, inflationary factors, and 20 days each at a cost of approximately $7.0 million, exclusivecapital. Based on the interim quantitative analysis, it was determined that the estimated fair value of the impacts due to the lost production.
Cost Classifications
Cost of materials and other consist primarily of freight and distribution expenses, feedstock expenses, purchased ammonia and purchased hydrogen.
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) consist primarily of energy and other utility costs, direct costs of labor, property taxes, plant-related maintenance services, including turnaround, and environmental and safety compliance costs as well as catalyst and chemical costs. Direct operating expenses also include allocated share-based compensation from CVR Energy andCoffeyville Facility reporting unit did not exceed its subsidiaries, as discussed in Note 4 ("Share‑Based Compensation").
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of direct and allocated legal expenses, treasury, accounting, marketing, human resources, information technology and maintaining the corporate offices. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include allocated share-based compensation from CVR Energy and its subsidiaries, as discussed in Note 4 ("Share‑Based Compensation").
Income Taxes
CVR Partners is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The income tax liability of the common unitholders is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements of the Partnership. Generally, each common unitholder is required to take into account its respective share of CVR Partners' income, gains, loss and deductions. The Partnership is not subject to income taxes, except for a franchise tax in the State of Texas, a replacement tax in the State of Illinois and as discussed below.
CVR Nitrogen Holdings, LLC, a corporate entity wholly owned by CVR Partners, generates income or loss based on its own activities.carrying value. As a limited liability company electing tax treatment as a corporation, the entity is subject to federal and state income taxes.
Under the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic ("ASC") 740, Income Taxes, bothresult, the Partnership (for taxes based on income suchrecorded a full non-cash impairment charge of $41.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2020. There was 0 goodwill remaining as the Texas franchise tax and the Illinois replacement tax) and the corporate entity account for income taxes using the asset and liability method under which deferred income taxes areof December 31, 2020.


72
December 31, 2020 | 56


Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



recognizedThe Partnership performed the annual impairment reviews of goodwill for 2019 and 2018 and concluded 0 impairments. For the future tax effectsperiod ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership performed a qualitative assessment and concluded there were no events or circumstances which would trigger the performance of temporary differences betweena quantitative analysis after reviewing all factors impacting the Coffeyville Facility, including improved market conditions and financial results in 2019 as compared to the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities using the enacted statutory tax rates in effect at the end of the period. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that the benefitforecasts from the deferred tax asset will not be realized. When applicable, penalties and interest related to uncertain tax positions are recorded as income tax expense.
Segment Reporting
The Partnership accounts for segment reporting in accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting, which establishes standards for entities to report information about the operating segments and geographic areas in which they operate. CVR Partners only operates one segment and all of its operations are located in the United States.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Partnership accounts for impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment — Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets ("ASC 360"). In accordance with ASC 360, the Partnership reviews long-lived assets (excluding goodwill) for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future net cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying value or fair value less cost to sell. No impairment charges were recognized for any of the periods presented.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues for products sold are recorded upon delivery of the products to customers, which is the point at which title is transferred, the customer has assumed the risk of loss and payment has been received or collection is reasonably assured. Deferred revenue represents customer prepayments under contracts to guarantee a price and supply of nitrogen fertilizer in quantities expected to be delivered in the next 12 months in the normal course of business. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are not included in reported revenues.
Shipping Costs
Pass-through finished goods delivery costs reimbursed by customers are reported in net sales, while an offsetting expense is included in cost of materials and other.
Derivative Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
From time to time, the Partnership enters into forward contracts with fixed delivery prices to purchase portions of its natural gas requirements. The Partnership elected to apply the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion to natural gas contracts that are entered into to bethose used in production within a reasonable time during the normal course of business. Accordingly, the fair value of these contracts are not recorded onanalysis at December 31, 2018 where the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Other financial instruments consisting of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable are carried at cost, which approximates fair value, as a result of the short-term nature of the instruments.
Share-Based Compensation
The Partnership has recorded share-based compensation related to the CVR Partners, LP Long Term Incentive Plan (the "CVR Partners LTIP") and has been allocated share-based compensation from CVR Energy. The Partnership accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). ASC 718 requires that compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in a company's financial statements. ASC 718 applies to transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services and also may apply to liabilities an entity incurs for goods or services that are based on theestimated fair value of those equity instruments. Currently, allthe Coffeyville Facility reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 36% based upon the results of the Partnership's share-based compensation awardsPartnership’s quantitative goodwill impairment test.

Loss Contingencies

In the ordinary course of business, CVR Partners may become party to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, and governmental investigations, including environmental, regulatory, and other matters. The outcome of these matters cannot always be predicted accurately, but the Partnership accrues liabilities for these matters if the Partnership has determined that it is probable a loss has been incurred and the loss can be reasonably estimated. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there are liability-classifiedno matters or contingencies that require recognition or disclosure.

The Partnership is subject to various stringent federal, state, and are measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period based on the applicable closing unit price. Compensation expense will fluctuate based on changes in the applicable unit price valuelocal environmental, health, and expense reversals resulting from employee terminations prior to the award vesting. See Note 4 ("Share‑Based Compensation") for further discussion.

73

CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Environmental Matters
safety rules and regulations. Liabilities related to future remediation costs of past environmental contamination of properties are recognized when the related costs are considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Estimates of these costs are based upon currently available facts, internal and third-party assessments of contamination, available remediation technology, site-specific costs, and currently enacted laws and regulations. In reporting environmental liabilities, no offset is made for potential recoveries. Loss contingency accruals, including those for environmental remediation, are subject to revision as further information develops or circumstances change and such accruals can take into account the legal liability of other parties. Management periodically reviews and, as appropriate, revises its environmental accruals. Environmental expenditures for capital assets are capitalized at the time of the expenditure when such costs provide future economic benefits. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, 0 liabilities have been recognized for environmental remediation matters as no matters have been identified that are considered to be probable or estimable.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership recognizes revenue based on consideration specified in contracts or agreements with customers when performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control over products or services to a customer. The adoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, resulted in the recognition of deferred revenue and related receivables, on a gross basis, associated with contracts that guarantee a price and supply of nitrogen fertilizer products in quantities expected to be delivered in the normal course of business.

Other accounting policies relevant to revenue include:
Revenue transactions that pass control at customers’ designated facilities;
Non-monetary product exchanges which are entered into in the normal course of business are included on a net cost basis in operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations; and
Pass-through finished goods delivery costs reimbursed by customers are reported in net sales, while an offsetting expense is included in cost of materials and other.

Other considerations - Excise and other taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from reported revenues.

Cost Classifications

Cost of materials and other consist primarily of freight and distribution expenses, feedstock expenses, purchased ammonia, and purchased hydrogen. Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) consist primarily of energy and other utility costs, direct costs of labor, property taxes, plant-related maintenance services, including turnaround, and environmental and safety compliance costs, as well as catalyst and chemical costs. Each of these financial statement line items are also impacted by changes in inventory balances. Direct operating expenses also include allocated share-based compensation from CVR Energy and its subsidiaries, as discussed in Note 7 (“Share-Based Compensation”). Selling, general and
December 31, 2020 | 57


Table of Contents
CVR Partners, LP and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

administrative expenses consist primarily of legal expenses, treasury, accounting, marketing, human resources, information technology, and maintaining the corporate and administrative offices in Texas and Kansas.

Share-Based Compensation

The Partnership accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). Currently, all of the Partnership’s share-based compensation awards are liability-classified and are measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period based on the applicable closing unit price. Compensation expense will fluctuate based on changes in the applicable unit price value and expense reversals resulting from employee terminations prior to award vesting. See Note 7 (“Share-Based Compensation”) for further discussion.

Income Taxes

CVR Partners accounts for income taxes utilizing the asset and liability approach. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred amounts are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Allocation of Costs

CVR Energy and its subsidiaries provide a variety of services to the Partnership, including cash management and financing services, employee benefits provided through CVR Energy'sEnergy’s benefit plans, administrative services provided by CVR Energy'sEnergy’s employees and management, insurance, and office space leased inby CVR Energy's headquarters building and other locations.Energy. As such, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include costs that have been incurred by CVR Energy on behalf of the Partnership. These amounts incurred by CVR Energy are then billed or allocated to the Partnership and are properly classified on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as either directDirect operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) or as selling,Selling, general and administrative expenses. The billing and allocation of such costs are governed by the services agreement entered into between CVR Energy, Inc., CVR Partners and CVR GP in October 2007 and subsequently amended. The services agreement provides guidance for the treatment of certain general and administrative expenses and certain direct operating expenses incurred on the Partnership's behalf. Such expenses include, but are not limited to, salaries, benefits, share-based compensation expense, insurance, accounting, tax, legal and technology services. Costs which are specifically incurred on behalf of the Partnership are billed directly to the Partnership. See Note 14 ("9 (“Related Party Transactions"Transactions”) for a detailed discussion of the billing procedures and the basis for calculating the charges for specific products and services.
The Partnership's general partner manages the Partnership's operations and activities as specified in the partnership agreement. The general partner of the Partnership is managed by its board of directors. The partnership agreement provides that the Partnership will reimburse its general partner for all direct and indirect expenses it incurs or payments it makes on behalf of the Partnership (including salary, bonus, incentive compensation and other amounts paid to any person to perform services for the Partnership or for its general partner in connection with operating the Partnership). See Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") for a detailed discussion of the operation of the general partner and the basis of the reimbursements.
Subsequent Events
The Partnership evaluated subsequent events, if any, that would require an adjustment to the Partnership's consolidated financial statements or require disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements through the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Adoption of Credit Losses Standard

In May 2014,June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326). The ASU replaces the incurred loss model with a current expected credit loss model for more timely recognition of expected impairment losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. Effective January 1, 2020, we adopted this ASU with no material impact on the Partnership’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Adoption of Fair Value Measurement Standard

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, creating a new topic, FASB ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers," which supersedes revenue recognition requirements in FASB ASC Topic 605, " Revenue Recognition." This ASU requires an entity to recognize2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820). The ASU eliminates such disclosures as the amount of revenue to which it expectsand reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Certain disclosures are required to be entitledapplied on a retrospective basis and others on a prospective basis. Effective January 1, 2020, we adopted this ASU with no material impact on the Partnership’s disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Implemented

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740). The ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the transfergeneral principles in Topic 740 and modifies other areas of promised goods or servicesthe topic to customers. In addition, an entity isclarify the application of GAAP. Certain amendments within the standard are required to disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timingbe applied on a retrospective basis and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Theothers on a prospective basis. This standard is effective for interim and annual periodsthe Partnership beginning after December 15, 2017.January 1, 2021, with early adoption permitted. The Partnership adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018 usingis evaluating the modified retrospective application method, whereby the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard is recognized, if applicable, as an adjustment to the opening balance of partners’ capital. The standard is applied prospectively and revenues reported in the periods prior to January 1, 2018 will not be changed. During the evaluation of the standard, the Partnership reviewedadopting this new accounting guidance on its existing revenue streams, including an evaluation of accounting policies, contract reviews and identification of the types of arrangements where differences may arise in the conversion to the new standard, identified practical expedients to be elected and evaluated additional disclosure requirements. The Partnership did not identify any material differences in its existing revenue recognition methods that require modification under the new standard and does not expect to record a material cumulative effect adjustment of applying the standard using the modified retrospective method. The standard's most significant impacts to the Partnership relate to enhanced disclosure requirements and a balance sheet presentation difference associated with contracts requiring customer prepayment prior to delivery. Prior to adoption of the new standard, deferred revenue was

consolidated financial
74
December 31, 2020 | 58


Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



statements, but does not currently expect adoption will have a material impact on the Partnership’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Partnership does not intend to early adopt this ASU.
recorded upon customer prepayment. Under the new standard, a receivable and associated deferred revenue will be recorded at the point in time in which a prepaid contract is legally enforceable and the associated right to consideration is unconditional.
In February 2016,March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases" ("2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848). This ASU 2016-02"was issued because, by the end of 2021, banks will no longer be required to report information that is used to determine London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), creatingwhich is used globally by all types of entities. As a new topic, FASB ASC Topicresult, LIBOR could be discontinued, as well as other interest rates used globally. ASU 2020-04 provides companies with optional expedients for contract modifications under Topics 310, 470, 842, " Leases,"and 815-15, excluded components of certain hedging relationships, fair value hedges, and cash flow hedges, as well as certain exceptions, which supersedes lease requirements in FASB ASC Topic 840, "Leases." The new standard revisesare intended to help ease the potential accounting burden associated with transitioning away from these reference rates. Companies can apply the ASU immediately. However, the guidance will only be available for operating leases by a lessee, among other changes, and requires a lessee to recognize a liability related to future lease payments and an asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term in the balance sheet. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures, including disclosures regarding significant judgments made by management, will be required. The standard is effective for the first interim and annual periods beginning afterlimited time (generally through December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. At adoption, ASU 2016-02 will be applied using the modified retrospective application method and allows for certain practical expedients.31, 2022). The Partnership expects its assessment and implementation plan to be ongoing during 2018 and is currently unable to reasonably estimateevaluating the impact ofthat adopting thethis new leasesaccounting standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Partnership currently believes the most significant change will relate to the recognition of right-of-use assets and leases liability on the balance sheet for existing long-term operating leases, the majority of which are railcar leases. The right of use asset, leases liability and related disclosures are expected to be material.

In January 2017,October 2020, the FASB issued No. ASU 2017-04, "Simplifying2020-10, Codification Improvements. The ASU amends various sections of the Test for Goodwill Impairment" ("ASU2017-04"). The new standard simplifiescodification in the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating step 2 from the goodwill quantitative impairment test. Instead, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equalBoards ongoing efforts to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Thesimplify and improve guidance. This standard is effective for interim and annual periodsthe Partnership beginning after December 15, 2019 andJanuary 1, 2021, with early adoption is permitted. The Partnership adoptedis evaluating the effect of adopting this standardnew accounting guidance on its consolidated financial statements, but does not currently expect adoption will have a material impact on the Partnership’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Partnership does not intend to early adopt this ASU.

(3) Leases

Lease Overview

We lease railcars and certain facilities to support the Partnership’s operations. Most leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from one to 20 years or more. The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. Certain leases also include options to purchase the leased property. Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments which are adjusted periodically for factors such as of January 1, 2017.inflation. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. Additionally, we do not have any lessor or sub-leasing arrangements.

(3) East Dubuque MergerBalance Sheet Summary at December 31, 2020 and 2019
On April 1, 2016,
The following tables summarize the Partnership completed the East Dubuque Merger as contemplated by the AgreementROU asset and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 9, 2015 (the "Merger Agreement"), whereby the Partnership acquired CVR Nitrogen and CVR Nitrogen GP. Pursuant to the East Dubuque Merger, the Partnership acquired the East Dubuque Facility. The primary reasonslease liability balances for the East Dubuque Merger were to expand the Partnership's geographical footprint, diversify its raw material feedstocks, widen its customer reachPartnership’s operating and increase its potential for cash-flow generation.
CVR Nitrogen sold its facility located in Pasadena, Texas as a condition to closing the East Dubuque Merger. The Partnership did not receive and will not receive any consideration relating to the sale of the Pasadena, Texas facility.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, holders of CVR Nitrogen common units eligible to receive consideration received 1.04 common units (the "unit consideration") representing limited partner interests in CVR Partners ("CVR Partners common units") and $2.57 in cash, without interest, (the "cash consideration" and together with the unit consideration, the "merger consideration") for each CVR Nitrogen common unit. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, CVR Partners issued approximately 40.2 million CVR Partners common units and paid approximately $99.2 million in cash consideration to CVR Nitrogen common unitholders and certain holders of CVR Nitrogen phantom units discussed below.
Phantom units granted and outstanding under CVR Nitrogen’s equity plans and held by an employee who continued in the employment of a CVR Partners-affiliated entity upon closing of the East Dubuque Merger were canceled and replaced with new incentive awards of substantially equivalent value and on similar terms. See Note 4 ("Share‑Based Compensation") for further discussion. Each phantom unit granted and outstanding and held by (i) an employee who did not continue in employment of a CVR Partners-affiliated entity, or (ii) a director of CVR Nitrogen GP, upon closing of the East Dubuque Merger, vested in full and the holders thereof received the merger consideration.
In accordance with the FASB’s ASC Topic 805 — Business Combinations ("ASC 805"), the Partnership accounted for the East Dubuque Merger as an acquisition of a business with CVR Partners as the acquirer. ASC 805 requires that the consideration transferred be measuredfinance leases at the current market price at the date of the closing of the East Dubuque Merger. The aggregate merger consideration was approximately $802.4 million, including the fair value of CVR Partners common units issued of $335.7 million, cash consideration of $99.2 million and $367.5 million fair value of assumed debt. The East Dubuque Facility contributed net sales of $128.0 million and an operating loss of $1.2 million to the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020 and 2019:
In March 2016, CVR Energy purchased 400,000 CVR Nitrogen common units, representing approximately 1% of the outstanding CVR Nitrogen limited partner interests. CVR Energy did not receive merger consideration for these designated
December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Operating Leases:
ROU asset, net
Railcars$7,327 $10,826 
Real estate and other3,040 2,581 
Lease liability
Railcars$7,696 $11,088 
Real estate and other867 228 
Finance Leases:
ROU asset, net
Real estate and other$101 $201 
Lease liability
Real estate and other$105 $205 


75
December 31, 2020 | 59


Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



Lease Expense Summary for the Year Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019
CVR Nitrogen common units. The Partnership recorded
We recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis over the noncontrolling interest fair valuelease term. For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we recognized lease expense comprised of $4.6the following components:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Operating lease expense$4,113 $3,122 
Finance lease expense:
Amortization of ROU asset$101 $322 
Interest expense on lease liability6 10 

Short-term lease expense, recognized within Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization), was $0.4 million in the purchase price consideration on April 1, 2016. Subsequent to the East Dubuque Merger, CVR Energy contributed $0.5and $0.4 million to CVR Nitrogen, and the Partnership purchased the 400,000 CVR Nitrogen common units from CVR Energy during the second quarter of 2016 for $5.0 million. The transaction eliminated the noncontrolling interest, and the net impact of $0.1 million was recorded as an increase to partners' capital on the Consolidated Statement of Partners' Capital for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020 and 2019, respectively.
Merger-Related Indebtedness
CVR Nitrogen’s debt arrangements that remainedLease Terms and Discount Rates

The following outlines the remaining lease terms and discount rates used in place after the closing datemeasurement of the East Dubuque Merger included $320.0 millionPartnership’s ROU assets and liabilities:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Operating Leases2.93.4
Finance Leases1.32.3
Weighted-average discount rate
Operating Leases5.1 %5.1 %
Finance Leases4.0 %3.9 %

Maturities of its 6.50% notes due 2021 (the "2021 Notes"). Lease Liabilities

The majorityfollowing summarizes the remaining minimum lease payments through maturity of the 2021 Notes were repurchased in June 2016, as discussed further in Note 10 ("Debt").Partnership’s ROU assets and liabilities at December 31, 2020:
Immediately prior to
(in thousands)Operating LeasesFinance Leases
2021$3,672 $107 
20223,236 0 
20231,367 0 
2024684 0 
2025263 0 
Thereafter0 0 
Total lease payments9,222 107 
Less: imputed interest(659)(2)
Total lease liability$8,563 $105 

On July 31, 2020, the East Dubuque Merger, CVR Nitrogen also had outstanding balances under a credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as successor-in-interest by assignment from General Electric Company, as administrative agentPartnership and Messer LLC (“Messer”) entered into an On-Site Product Supply Agreement (the "Wells Fargo Credit Agreement"“Messer Agreement”). The Wells Fargo CreditUnder the Messer Agreement, consisted of a $50.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility with a $10.0 million letter of credit sublimit. In connection withamong other obligations, Messer is obligated to supply and make certain capital improvements during the closingterm of the East Dubuque Merger, the Partnership paid $49.4 million for the outstanding balance, accrued interest and fees under the Wells Fargo CreditMesser Agreement, and the Wells Fargo Credit Agreement was canceled.
Purchase Price Allocation
UnderPartnership is obligated to take as available and pay for, oxygen, nitrogen, and compressed dry air from Messer’s facility. This arrangement for the acquisition methodPartnership’s purchase of accounting,oxygen, nitrogen, and dry air from Messer does not meet the purchase price was allocateddefinition of a lease under FASB ASC Topic 842, Leases, (“Topic 842”), as the Partnership does not expect to CVR Nitrogen's net tangible assets based on their fair values as of April 1, 2016. The Partnership has obtained an independent appraisalreceive substantially all of the net assets acquired. Determiningoutput of Messer’s on-site production from its air separation unit over the fair valuelife of net tangible assets requires judgment and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions.Messer Agreement. The Partnership based its fair value estimates on assumptions it believesMesser Agreement also obligates Messer to be reasonable but are inherently uncertain.
The following table, set forth below, displays the purchase price allocated to CVR Nitrogen's net tangible assets based on their fair values as of April 1, 2016. There were no identifiable intangible assets.install a new oxygen
  Purchase Price Allocation
  (in millions)
Cash $35.4
Accounts receivable 8.9
Inventories 49.1
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1) 5.2
Property, plant and equipment 775.3
Other long-term assets 1.1
Deferred revenue (29.8)
Other current liabilities (2) (37.0)
Long-term debt (367.5)
Other long-term liabilities (1.2)
Total fair value of net assets acquired 439.5
Less: Cash acquired 35.4
Total consideration transferred, net of cash acquired $404.1
_____________
(1)Includes $4.0 million for the estimated fair value of insurance proceeds related to an event that occurred prior to the East Dubuque Merger. The Partnership received $4.0 million during the second quarter of 2016, which was included in operating activities on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows the year ended December 31, 2016.
(2)Includes an assumed liability of $11.8 million for third-party financial advisory services provided to CVR Nitrogen that became payable upon the closing of the East Dubuque Merger and was subsequently paid by CVR Partners on

December 31, 2020 | 60
76

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



April 1, 2016, which was included in operating activities onstorage vessel and related equipment to be used solely by the Consolidated Statement of Cash FlowsCoffeyville Facility. The arrangement for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Pro Forma Financial Information
The summary pro forma financial information for the periods presented below gives effect to the East Dubuque Merger as if it had occurred at the beginninguse of the periods presented. The pro forma financial information foroxygen storage vessel and related equipment meets the definition of a lease under Topic 842, as the Partnership will receive all periods presented were adjusted to give effect to pro forma events that are i) directly attributable tooutput associated with the East Dubuque Merger, ii) factually supportable and iii) expected to have a continuing impactvessel. Based on terms outlined in the consolidated results of operations.
Pro forma net income (loss) has been adjusted to exclude $3.8 million and $6.0 million, respectively, of merger-related costs incurred duringMesser Agreement, the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Pro forma net income (loss) has also been adjusted to exclude $13.0 million of nonrecurring expenses related toPartnership expects the fair value adjustment to acquisition-date inventory and deferred revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Incremental interest expense for financing the cash merger consideration and financing the payofflease of the Wells Fargo Credit Agreement has also been adjusted foroxygen storage vessel to be classified as a financing lease with an amount between $20 and $25 million being capitalized upon lease commencement when the oxygen storage vessel is placed in the pro forma financial information,service.

(4) Other Current Liabilities

Other current liabilities were as well as incremental depreciation resulting from increased fair value of the property, plant and equipment as noted in the preliminary purchase price allocation.follows:
The summary pro forma financial information is for informational purposes only and does not purport to represent what the Partnership's consolidated results of operations actually would have been if the East Dubuque Merger had occurred at any date, and such data does not purport to project the Partnership's results of operations for any future period. The basic and diluted units outstanding used to calculate the pro forma net income (loss) per unit
December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Personnel accruals$7,475 $8,187 
Operating lease liabilities3,309 3,523 
Accrued interest2,506 2,518 
Sales incentives2,215 1,614 
Share-based compensation442 5,011 
Prepaid revenue contracts197 277 
Other accrued expenses and liabilities2,565 2,913 
   Total other current liabilities$18,709 $24,043 

Other current liabilities include amounts presented below have been adjusted to assume units issued at the closing of the East Dubuque Merger were outstanding since January 1, 2015.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015
     
  (in thousands, except per unit data)
Net sales $391,132
 $490,538
Net income (loss) (14,619) 89,818
Net income (loss) per common unit, basic and diluted (0.13) 0.79
Expenses Associated with the East Dubuque Merger
During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,accrued by the Partnership incurred $3.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of legal and other professional fees and other merger-related expenses, which were included in selling, general and administrative expense.
(4) Share‑Based Compensation
Certain employees of CVR Partners and employees of CVR Energy who perform services for the Partnership under the services agreement with CVR Energy participate in equity compensation plans of CVR Partners' affiliates. All compensation expense related to these plans for full-time employees of CVR Partners has been attributed 100% to the Partnership. For employees of CVR Energy, the Partnership records share-based compensation relative to the percentage of time spent by each employee providing services to the Partnership as compared to the total calculated share-based compensation by CVR Energy. The Partnership recognizes the costs of share-based compensation in selling, general and administrative expenses and direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization). Allocated expense amounts related to plans for which the Partnership is responsible for payment are reflected as an increase or decrease to accrued expenses and other current liabilities.
Long-Term Incentive Plan — CVR Energy
CVR Energy has a Long-Term Incentive Plan ("CVR Energy LTIP") that permits the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, dividend equivalent rights, share awards and performance awards (including performance share units, performance units and performance based restricted stock). As of December 31, 2017, only grants of performance units under the CVR Energy LTIP remain outstanding. Individuals who are eligible to receive awards and grants under the CVR Energy LTIP include CVR Energy’s or its subsidiaries’ employees, officers, consultants and directors.

77

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Performance Unit Awards
In December 2015, CVR Energy entered into a performance unit award agreement (the "2015 Performance Unit Award Agreement") with Mr. Lipinski, CVR Energy's then Chief Executive Officer and President. Compensation cost for the 2015 Performance Unit Award Agreement was recognized over the performance cycle from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. The awards were fully vested at December 31, 2016 and the Partnership reimbursed CVR Energy $0.5 million for its allocated portion of the performance unit award during the first quarter of 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the Partnership had a liability of $0.5 million, for its allocated portion of the 2015 Performance Unit Award Agreement, which was recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Compensation expense recorded for year ended December 31, 2016 related to the awards was approximately $0.5 million.

In December 2016, CVR Energy entered into a performance unit award agreement (the "2016 Performance Unit Award Agreement") with Mr. Lipinski. Compensation cost for the 2016 Performance Unit Award Agreement was recognized over the performance cycle from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. The Partnership will be responsible for reimbursing CVR Energy for its allocated portion of the performance unit award. Compensation expense recorded for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the awards was approximately $0.5 million. As of December 31, 2017, the Partnership had a liability of $0.5 million, for its allocated portion of the 2016 Performance Unit Award Agreement, which is recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In November 2017, CVR Energy entered into a performance unit award agreement (the "2017 Performance Unit Award Agreement") with Mr. Lamp, CVR Energy's current Chief Executive Officer and President. Compensation cost for the 2017 Performance Unit Award Agreement will be recognized over the performance cycle from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. The performance unit award represents the right to receive, upon vesting, a cash payment equal to a defined threshold in accordance with the award agreement, multiplied by a performance factor that is based upon the achievement of certain performance objectives. The Partnership will be responsible for reimbursing CVR Energy for its allocated portion of the performance unit award. Assuming a target performance threshold and that the allocation of costs from CVR Energy remains consistent with the allocation percentages in place at December 31, 2017, there was approximately $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the 2017 Performance Unit Award Agreement to be recognized over a period of 1.0 year.
Incentive Unit Awards — CVR Energy
CVR Energy granted awards of incentive units and distribution equivalent rights to certain employees of CRLLC, CVR Energy, and the Partnership's general partner who provide shared servicesowed to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including the Partnership).affiliates of $5.4 million at December 31, 2019. The awards are generally graded-vesting awards, which are expectedPartnership had 0 separate affiliate liabilities owed to vest over three years, with one-thirdCVR Energy and its affiliates at December 31, 2020, as allocation of affiliate accruals is part of the award vesting each year. Compensationamount charged to the Partnership under the new Corporate Master Service Agreement, which became effective January 1, 2020 (the “Corporate MSA”). Refer to Note 9 (“Related Party Transactions”) for additional discussion.

(5) Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:
December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
9.25% Senior Secured Notes, due June 2023 (1)(2)$645,000 $645,000 
6.50% Senior Notes, due April 2021, net of current portion (3)0 $2,240 
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs (4)(11,058)(14,834)
Total long-term debt633,942 632,406 
Current portion of long-term debt (3)2,240 
Total long-term debt, including current portion$636,182 $632,406 
(1)This debt was issued at a $16.1 million discount which is being amortized, as interest expense, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting periodremaining term of the respective tranche of the award. Each incentive unit and distribution equivalent right represents the right to receive, upon vesting, a cash payment equal to (i) the averagedebt. Debt issuance costs associated with this debt totaled $9.4 million.
(2)The estimated fair market value of one common unit of CVR Refining, LP ("CVR Refining") in accordance with the award agreement, plus (ii) the per unit cash value of all distributions declared and paid by CVR Refining from the grant date to and including the vesting date. The awards, which are liability-classified, are remeasured at each subsequent reporting date until they vest.
Assuming the portion of time spent on CVR Partners related matters by CVR Energy employees providing services to CVR Partners remains consistent with the amount of services provided during December 31, 2017, theretotal long-term debt outstanding was approximately $2.1$645.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the incentive units and associated distribution equivalent rights to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.6 years. Inclusion of a vesting table would not be meaningful due to changes in allocation percentages that may occur from time to time. The unrecognized compensation expense has been determined by the number of incentive units and respective allocation percentage for individuals for whom,$673.8 million as of December 31, 2017, compensation expense2020 and 2019, respectively. This estimate of fair value is a Level 2 measurement as it was determined by quotations obtained from a broker-dealer who makes a market in these and similar securities.
(3)The 6.50% Senior Notes, due April 2021, mature within 12 months, and, therefore, the outstanding balance of $2.2 million has been allocated to the Partnership. Compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 related to the incentive unit awards was $1.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The Partnership is responsible for reimbursing CVR Energy for its allocated portion of the awards.
Asclassified as short-term as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Partnership had a liability related to these awards of $0.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, which were recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. 2020.
(4)For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019, and 2015, the Partnership reimbursed CVR Energy $1.0 million, $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for its allocated portion of the incentive unit award payments.

78

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Long-Term Incentive Plan — CVR Partners
The CVR Partners LTIP provides for the grant of options, unit appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, restricted units, phantom units and other unit-based awards, each in respect of common units. Individuals eligible to receive awards under the CVR Partners LTIP include (i) employees of the Partnership and its subsidiaries (ii) employees of the general partner, (iii) members of the board of directors of the general partner and (iv) certain CVR Partners' parent's employees, consultants and directors who perform services for the benefit of the Partnership.
Through the CVR Partners LTIP, phantom and common units have been awarded to employees of the Partnership and the general partner and to members of the board of directors of the general partner. Phantom unit awards made to employees and members of the board of directors of the general partner are considered non-employee equity-based awards. Awards to employees of the Partnership and employees of the general partner vest over a three-year period and awards to members of the board of directors of the general partner generally vest immediately on the grant date. The maximum number of common units issuable under the CVR Partners LTIP is 5,000,000. As of December 31, 2017, there were 4,820,215 common units available for issuance under the CVR Partners LTIP. As phantom unit awards discussed below are cash-settled awards, they do not reduce the number of common units available for issuance.
Common Units and Certain Phantom Units Awards
Awards of phantom units and distribution equivalent rights were granted to certain employees of the Partnership and its subsidiaries' employees and the employees of the general partner. Common unit awards granted in prior years are not material in the periods presented and were fully vested and settled as of December 31, 2015. The phantom unit awards are generally graded-vesting awards, which are expected to vest over three years with one-third of the award vesting each year. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the respective tranche of the award. Each phantom unit and distribution equivalent right represents the right to receive, upon vesting, a cash payment equal to (i) the average fair market value of one unit of the Partnership's common units in accordance with the award agreement, plus (ii) the per unit cash value of all distributions declared and paid by the Partnership from the grant date to and including the vesting date. The awards, which are liability-classified, are remeasured at each subsequent reporting date until they vest.
In connection with the East Dubuque Merger as described in Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger"), 195,980 phantom units were granted to certain CVR Nitrogen employees.  A related liability of $0.6 million was recorded as part of the opening balance sheet and included in personnel accruals in the purchase price allocation in Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger").  Subsequent to the East Dubuque Merger, 79,654 awards were subject to an accelerated vesting date and were paid in full resulting in the early recognition of $0.4 million as compensation expense in selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016.

79

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


A summary of the common units and phantom units (collectively "Units") activity under the CVR Partners LTIP during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is presented below:
 Units 
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
     (dollars in thousands)
Non-vested at December 31, 2014243,946
 $11.07
 $2,376
Granted245,199
 7.87
  
Vested(94,854) 12.55
  
Forfeited(2,388) 10.99
  
Non-vested at December 31, 2015391,903
 $8.71
 $3,139
Granted680,718
 6.20
  
Vested(292,536) 8.78
  
Forfeited(8,299) 8.72
  
Non-vested at December 31, 2016771,786
 $6.47
 $4,638
Granted780,372
 3.48
  
Vested(340,730) 7.01
  
Forfeited(23,222) 6.49
  
Non-vested at December 31, 20171,188,206
 $4.35
 $3,897
Unrecognized compensation expense associated with the unvested phantom units at December 31, 2017 was approximately $3.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years. Compensation expense recorded for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 related to the awards under the CVR Partners LTIP was approximately $1.1 million, $1.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Compensation expense related to the awards issued to employees of the Partnership and its subsidiaries under the CVR Partners LTIP has been recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses - third parties and direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) - third parties. Compensation expense related to the awards issued to employees and members of the board of directors of the general partner under the CVR Partners LTIP has been recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses - affiliates and direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) - affiliates as the expense has been incurred for the benefit of employees or directors of the general partner.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Partnership had a liability of $0.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for cash settled non-vested phantom unit awards and associated distribution equivalent rights, which is recorded in personnel accruals on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership paid cash of $1.4 million, $2.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively, to settle liability-classified awards upon vesting.
(5) Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
 December 31,
 2017 2016
    
 (in thousands)
Finished goods$13,594
 $15,860
Raw materials and precious metals6,333
 8,818
Parts and supplies34,170
 33,489
   Total inventories$54,097
 $58,167

80

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


(6) Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment consisted of the following:
 December 31,
 2017 2016
    
 (in thousands)
Land and improvements$13,092
 $12,995
Buildings and improvements16,990
 14,881
Machinery and equipment1,352,573
 1,343,980
Automotive equipment599
 599
Furniture and fixtures1,582
 1,437
Railcars16,261
 16,261
Construction in progress9,659
 9,588
 $1,410,756
 $1,399,741
Less: Accumulated depreciation341,230
 269,620
Total property, plant, and equipment, net$1,069,526
 $1,130,121
Capitalized interest recognized as a reduction of interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $0.2 million, $0.5 million, and $9,000, respectively.
(7) Partners’ Capital and Partnership Distributions
The Partnership has two types of partnership interests outstanding:
common units; and
a general partner interest, which is not entitled to any distributions, and which is held by the general partner.
At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Partnership had a total of 113,282,973 common units issued and outstanding, of which 38,920,000 common units were owned by CRLLC, representing approximately 34% of the total Partnership common units outstanding.
The board of directors of the Partnership's general partner has a policy for the Partnership to distribute all available cash generated on a quarterly basis. Cash distributions will be made to the common unitholders of record on the applicable record date, generally within 60 days after the end of each quarter. Available cash for each quarter will be determined by the board of directors of the general partner following the end of such quarter.
Available cash begins with Adjusted EBITDA reduced for cash needed for (i) net cash interest expense (excluding capitalized interest) and debt service and other contractual obligations; (ii) maintenance capital expenditures; and (iii) to the extent applicable, major scheduled turnaround expenses, reserves for future operating or capital needs that the board of directors of the general partner deems necessary or appropriate, and expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger, if any. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (net income before interest expense, net, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization) further adjusted for the impact of non-cash share-based compensation, and, when applicable, major scheduled turnaround expense, gain or loss on extinguishment of debt, loss on disposition of assets, expenses associated with the East Dubuque Merger and business interruption insurance recovery. Available cash for distribution may be increased by the release of previously established cash reserves, if any, at the discretion of the board of directors of the general partner, and available cash is increased by the business interruption insurance proceeds and the impact of purchase accounting. Actual distributions are set by the board of directors of the general partner. The board of directors of the general partner may modify the cash distribution policy at any time, and the partnership agreement does not require the board of directors of the general partner to make distributions at all.

81

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


The following is a summary of cash distributions paid to the unitholders during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 for the respective quarters to which the distributions relate:
 December 31,
2016
 March 31,
2017
 June 30,
2017
 September 30,
2017
 Total Cash
Distributions
Paid in 2017
          
 ($ in millions, except per common unit amounts)
Amount paid to CRLLC$
 $0.8
 $
 $
 $0.8
Amounts paid to public unitholders
 1.5
 
 
 1.5
Total amount paid$
 $2.3
 $
 $
 $2.3
Per common unit$
 $0.02
 $
 $
 $0.02
Common units outstanding (in thousands)113,283
 113,283
 113,283
 113,283
  
 December 31,
2015
 
March 31,
  2016(1)
 June 30,
2016
 September 30,
2016
 Total Cash
Distributions
Paid in 2016
          
 ($ in millions, except per common unit amounts)
Amount paid to CRLLC$10.5
 $10.5
 $6.6
 $
 $27.6
Amounts paid to public unitholders9.2
 20.1
 12.7
 
 42.0
Total amount paid$19.7
 $30.6
 $19.3
 $
 $69.6
Per common unit$0.27
 $0.27
 $0.17
 $
 $0.71
Common units outstanding (in thousands)73,128
 113,283
 113,283
 113,283
  
 December 31,
2014
 March 31,
2015
 June 30,
2015
 September 30,
2015
 
Total Cash
Distributions
Paid in 2015
          
 ($ in millions, except per common unit amounts)
Amount paid to CRLLC$16.0
 $17.5
 $15.2
 $
 $48.7
Amounts paid to public unitholders14.0
 15.4
 13.3
 
 42.7
Total amount paid$30.0
 $32.9
 $28.5
 $
 $91.4
Per common unit$0.41
 $0.45
 $0.39
 $
 $1.25
Common units outstanding (in thousands)73,123
 73,123
 73,123
 73,123
  

_____________________________

(1) The distribution per common unit for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was calculated based on the post-merger common units outstanding.

(8) Goodwill
The Partnership evaluates the carrying value of goodwill annually as of November 1 and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Partnership's goodwill reporting unit is the Coffeyville Facility. No impairment of goodwill was recorded for any of the periods presented.
August 31, 2017 Interim Impairment Test
Based on a significant decline in market capitalization and lower cash flow forecasts resulting from weakened fertilizer pricing trends that occurred during the third quarter of 2017, the Partnership identified a triggering event and therefore performed an interim goodwill impairment test as of August 31, 2017. The quantitative goodwill impairment analysis compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. The Coffeyville Facility reporting unit fair value was based upon consideration of various valuation methodologies, including guideline public company multiples and projected future cash

82

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


flows discounted at rates commensurate with the risk involved. The carrying amount of the reporting unit was less than its fair value; therefore, no impairment was recorded.
The fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 12% based upon the results of the interim goodwill impairment test as of August 31, 2017. Judgments and assumptions are inherent in management’s estimates used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. Assumptions used in the discounted cash flows ("DCF") included estimating appropriate discount rates and growth rates, and estimating the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. The discount rates used in the DCF, which are intended to reflect the risks inherent in future cash flow projections, are based on estimates of the weighted-average cost of capital of a market participant. Such estimates are derived from analysis of peer companies and consider the industry weighted average return on debt and equity from a market participant perspective. The most significant assumption to determining the fair value of the reporting unit was forecasted fertilizer pricing. The Partnership also calculated fair value estimates derived from the market approach utilizing the public company market multiple method, which required assumptions about the applicability of those multiples to the Coffeyville Facility reporting unit.
November 1, 2017 Annual Impairment Test
Due to the short length of time since the August 31, 2017 interim impairment test, the Partnership elected to perform a qualitative evaluation for its annual test as of November 1, 2017. The qualitative analysis included an analysis of the key drivers and other external factors that may impact the results of operations of the Coffeyville Facility to determine if any significant events, transactions or other factors had occurred or are expected to occur that would indicate the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying value. After assessing the totality of events and circumstances, it was determined that there were no events or circumstances that would have a significant negative impact to management’s estimates used in the August 31, 2017 goodwill analysis, and therefore, it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the Coffeyville Facility was less than the carrying value. Based on the results of the test, it was not necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment analysis.
(9) Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities were as follows:
 December 31,
 2017 2016
    
 (in thousands)
Property taxes$1,493
 $1,742
Accrued interest2,683
 2,683
Railcar maintenance accruals678
 2,502
Affiliates (1)3,221
 2,515
Other accrued expenses and liabilities3,367
 2,932
   Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities$11,442
 $12,374


(1)Accrued expenses and other current liabilities include amounts owed by the Partnership to CVR Energy under the feedstock and shared services agreement and services agreement. Refer to "Allocation of Costs" in Note 2 ("Summary of Significant Accounting Policies") and refer to Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") for additional discussion.


83

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


(10) Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
 December 31,
 2017 2016
    
 (in thousands)
9.250% senior secured notes, due 2023$645,000
 $645,000
6.50% notes, due 20212,240
 2,240
Total long-term debt, before unamortized discount and debt issuance costs647,240
 647,240
Less:   
Unamortized discount13,457
 15,220
Unamortized debt issuance costs7,879
 8,913
Total long-term debt, net of current portion$625,904
 $623,107
For the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,2018, amortization of the discount on debt and amortization of deferred financing costs reported as Interest expense, net totaled approximately $3.8 million, $3.4 million, and $3.1 million, respectively.


December 31, 2020 | 61


Table of Contents
CVR Partners, LP and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Credit Agreements
(in thousands)Total CapacityAmount borrowed as of December 31, 2020Outstanding Letters of CreditAvailable capacity as of December 31, 2020Maturity Date
ABL Credit Agreement (1)(2)$20,146 $0 $0 $20,146 September 30, 2022

(1)At the option of the borrowers, loans under the ABL Credit Agreement initially bear interest expenseat an annual rate equal to (i) 1.00% plus a base rate, Thereafter, loans will bear interest (i) at such rates if our quarterly excess availability is greater than 50% and (ii) 1.50% plus a base rate, otherwise.
(2)The ABL Credit Agreement was amended on September 29, 2020 to, among other things, reduce the commitments thereunder to $35 million and extended the maturity date to September 30, 2022. Deferred financing costs of $0.4 million were capitalized related to this amendment and will be amortized from Prepaid expenses and other financing costs totaled approximately $3.0current assets and Other long-term assets over the remaining term of the ABL Credit Agreement. Amortization expense was $0.2 million $1.7 millionfor the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and $1.0 million, respectively.2018.

9.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2023 Notes

On June 10, 2016, the PartnershipCVR Partners and CVR Nitrogen Finance Corporation ("(“CVR Nitrogen Finance"Finance”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership,CVR Partners (together the "2023“2023 Notes Issuers"Issuers”), certain subsidiary guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee and as collateral trustee, completed a private offering of $645.0$645 million aggregate principal amount of 9.250%9.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2023 (the "2023 Notes"“2023 Notes”). The 2023 Notes mature on June 15, 2023, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased by the issuers. Interest on the 2023 Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2016.year. The 2023 Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of the Partnership’s existing subsidiaries.
The
On or after June 15, 2019, the 2023 Notes were issued at a $16.1 million discount, which is being amortized over the termIssuers may on any one or more occasions, redeem all or part of the 2023 Notes at the redemption prices set forth below expressed as interest expense using the effective-interest method. The Partnership received approximately $622.9 million of cash proceeds, neta percentage of the original issue discount and underwriting fees, but before deducting other third-party fees and expenses associated with the offering. The net proceeds from the saleprincipal amount of the 2023 Notes were used to: (i) repay all amounts outstanding underplus accrued and unpaid interest to the CRLLC Facility (defined and discussed below); (ii) finance the repurchase of substantially all of the 2021 Notes (discussed below) and (iii) to pay related fees and expenses.applicable redemption date.
The debt issuance costs of the 2023 Notes totaled approximately $9.4 million and are being amortized over the term of the 2023 Notes as interest expense using the effective-interest amortization method. 
12-month period beginning June 15,Percentage
2020102.313%
2021 and thereafter100%

The 2023 Notes contain customary covenants for a financing of this type that, among other things, restrict the Partnership’sCVR Partners’ ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to: (i) sell assets; (ii) pay distributions on, redeem or repurchase the Partnership’s units or redeem or repurchase its subordinated debt; (iii) make investments; (iv) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred units; (v) create or incur certain liens; (vi) enter into agreements that restrict distributions or other payments from the Partnership’sPartnerships’ restricted subsidiaries to the Partnership; (vii) consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of the Partnership’sPartnerships’ assets; (viii) engage in transactions with affiliates; and (ix) create unrestricted subsidiaries. In addition, the indenture contains customary events of default, the occurrence of which would result in or permit the trustee or the holders of at least 25% of the 2023 Notes to cause the acceleration of the 2023 Notes, in addition to the pursuit of other available remedies.
The indenture governing the 2023 Notes prohibits the Partnership from making distributions to unitholders if any default or event of default (as defined in the indenture) exists. In addition, the indenture limits the Partnership's ability to pay distributions to unitholders. The covenants will apply differently depending on the Partnership's fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the indenture). If the fixed charge coverage ratio is not less than 1.75 to 1.0, the Partnership will generally be permitted to make restricted payments, including distributions to its unitholders, without substantive restriction. If the fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.75 to 1.0, the Partnership will generally be permitted to make restricted payments, including distributions to the Partnership's common unitholders, up to an aggregate $75.0 million basket plus certain other amounts referred to as

ABL Credit Agreement
84

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


"incremental funds" under the indenture. As of December 31, 2017, the ratio was less than 1.75 to 1.0. Restricted payments have been made, and $72.7 million of the basket was available as of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, the Partnership was in compliance with the covenants contained in the 2023 Notes.
Included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets is accrued interest payable totaling approximately $2.7 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the 2023 Notes. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, the estimated fair value of the 2023 Notes was approximately $694.2 million and $664.4 million. This estimate of fair value is Level 2 as it was determined by quotations obtained from a broker-dealer who makes a market in these and similar securities.
2021 Notes
The $320.0 million of 2021 Notes were issued by CVR Nitrogen and CVR Nitrogen Finance prior to the East Dubuque Merger. The 2021 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The 2021 Notes are scheduled to mature on April 15, 2021, unless repurchased or redeemed earlier in accordance with their terms. The substantial majority of the 2021 Notes were repurchased in 2016. During year ended December 31, 2016, the Partnership recognized a net loss on debt extinguishment of $4.9 million. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $2.2 million of principal amount of the 2021 Notes remained outstanding and accrued interest was nominal.
Asset Based (ABL) Credit Facility
On September 30, 2016,29, 2020, CVR Partners amended the Partnership entered intoABL Credit Agreement, a senior secured asset based revolving credit facility (the "ABL“ABL Credit Facility"Facility”) with a group of lenders and UBS AG Stamford Branch ("UBS"(“UBS”), as administrative agent and collateral agent. The ABL Credit Facility has anAmendment amended the aggregate principal amount of availability of up to $50.0$35 million with an incremental facility, which permits an increase in borrowings of up to $25.0$25 million in the aggregate subject to additional lender commitments and certain other conditions. The proceeds of the loans may be used for capital expenditures and working capital and general corporate purposes of the Partnership and its subsidiaries. The ABL Credit Facility provides for loans and standby letters of credit in an amount up to the aggregate availability under the facility, subject to meeting certain borrowing base conditions, with sub-limits of the lesser of 10% of the total facility commitment and $5.0 million for swingline loans and $10.0 million for letters of credit. The ABL Credit FacilityAmendment is scheduled to mature on September 30, 2021.2022.
At the option
The Partnership is in compliance with all covenants of the borrowers, loans under9.25% Senior Secured Notes, the 6.50% Senior Notes, and the ABL Credit Facility initially bear interest at an annual rate equal to (i) 2.00% plus LIBOR or (ii) 1.00% plus a base rate, subject to a 0.50% step-down based on the previous quarter’s excess availability. The borrowers must also pay a commitment fee on the unutilized commitments and also pay customary letter of credit fees.
The ABL Credit Facility also contains customary covenants for a financing of this type that limit the ability of the Partnership and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur liens, engage in a consolidation, merger, purchase or sale of assets, pay dividends, incur indebtedness, make advances, investments and loans, enter into affiliate transactions, issue equity interests or create subsidiaries and unrestricted subsidiaries. The ABL Credit Facility also contains a fixed charge coverage ratio financial covenant, as defined therein. The Partnership was in compliance with the covenants of the ABL Credit FacilityAgreement as of December 31, 2017.2020.
In connection with the ABL Credit Facility, the Partnership incurred lender and other third-party costs of approximately $1.2 million, which are being deferred and amortized to interest expense and other financing costs using the straight-line method over the term of the facility.
As of
December 31, 2017, the Partnership and its subsidiaries had availability under the ABL Credit Facility of $43.8 million. There were no borrowings outstanding under the ABL Credit Facility as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Availability under the ABL Credit Facility was limited by borrowing base conditions as of December 31, 2017.2020 | 62
CRLLC Facility
On April 1, 2016, in connection with the closing of the East Dubuque Merger, the Partnership entered into a $300.0 million senior term loan credit facility (the "CRLLC Facility") with CRLLC, as the lender, the proceeds of which were used by the Partnership (i) to fund the repayment of amounts outstanding under the Wells Fargo Credit Agreement discussed in Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger") (ii) to pay the cash consideration and to pay fees and expenses in connection with the East Dubuque Merger and related transactions and (iii) to repay all of the loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement discussed below. The CRLLC Facility had a term of two years and an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. Interest was calculated on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed over a 360-day year and payable quarterly. In April 2016, the Partnership borrowed $300.0

85

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



(6) Revenue

The following table presents the Partnership’s revenue, disaggregated by major product:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Ammonia$94,117 $94,467 $66,254 
UAN198,258 251,199 222,329 
Urea products14,115 17,430 20,633 
Net sales, exclusive of freight and other306,490 363,096 309,216 
Freight revenue33,329 33,436 33,567 
Other revenue10,134 7,645 8,299 
Net sales$349,953 $404,177 $351,082 

The Partnership sells its products on a wholesale basis under a contract or by purchase order. The Partnership’s contracts with customers generally contain fixed pricing and most have terms of less than one year. The Partnership recognizes revenue at the point in time at which the customer obtains control of the product, which is generally upon delivery and acceptance by the customer. The customer acceptance point is stated in the contract and may be at one of the Partnership’s manufacturing facilities, at one of the Partnership’s off-site loading facilities, or at the customer’s designated facility. Freight revenue recognized by the Partnership represents the pass-through finished goods delivery costs incurred prior to customer acceptance and is reimbursed by customers. An offsetting expense for freight is included in Cost of materials and other. Qualifying taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are not included in reported revenues.

Depending on the product sold and the type of contract, payments from customers are generally either due prior to delivery or within 15 to 30 days of product delivery.

The Partnership generally provides no warranty other than the implicit promise that goods delivered are free of liens and encumbrances and meet the agreed upon specifications. Product returns are rare, and as such, the Partnership does not record a specific warranty reserve or consider activities related to such warranty, if any, to be a separate performance obligation.

The Partnership has an immaterial amount of variable consideration for contracts with an original duration of less than a year. A small portion of the Partnership’s revenue includes contracts extending beyond one year, some of which contain variable pricing in which the majority of the variability is attributed to the market-based pricing. The Partnership’s contracts do not contain a significant financing component.

The Partnership has an immaterial amount of fee-based revenue, included in other revenue in the table above, that is recognized based on the net amount of the proceeds received.

Transaction Price - Allocation to Remaining Performance Obligations

As of December 31, 2020, the Partnership had approximately $6.1 million of remaining performance obligations for contracts with an original expected duration of more than one year. The Partnership expects to recognize approximately $3.5 million of these performance obligations as revenue by the end of 2021, an additional $2.3 million in 2022, and the remaining balance thereafter. The Partnership has elected to not disclose the amount of transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations for contracts with an original expected duration of less than one year. The Partnership has elected to not disclose variable consideration allocated to wholly unsatisfied performance obligations that are based on market prices that have not yet been determined.

Contract Balances

The Partnership’s deferred revenue is a contract liability that primarily relates to nitrogen fertilizer sales contracts requiring customer prepayment prior to product delivery to guarantee a price and supply of nitrogen fertilizer. Deferred revenue is recorded at the point in time in which a prepaid contract is legally enforceable and the associated right to consideration is unconditional prior to transferring product to the customer. An associated receivable is recorded for uncollected prepaid
December 31, 2020 | 63


Table of Contents
CVR Partners, LP and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

contract amounts. Contracts requiring prepayment are generally short-term in nature and, as discussed above, revenue is recognized at the point in time in which the customer obtains control of the product.

A summary of the deferred revenue activity during the year ended December 31, 2020 is presented below:
(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2019$27,841
Add:
New prepay contracts entered into during the period (1)56,490
Less:
Revenue recognized that was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the period(27,060)
Revenue recognized related to contracts entered into during the period(26,141)
Other changes(499)
Balance at December 31, 2020$30,631

(1)Includes $33.4 million where payment associated with prepaid contracts was collected.

Major Customers

CVR Partners has two customers who comprised 26%, 28%, and 20% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

(7) Share-Based Compensation

CVR Partners’ Phantom Unit Awards

CVR Partners has a Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) which permits the granting of options, stock and unit appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted shares, restricted stock units, phantom units, unit awards, substitute awards, other unit-based awards, cash awards, dividend and distribution equivalent rights, share awards, and performance awards (including performance share units, performance units, and performance-based restricted stock). As of December 31, 2020, only phantom unit awards under the CRLLC Facility. On June 10, 2016, the Partnership paid off the $300.0 million outstandingLTIP remained outstanding. Individuals who are eligible to receive awards and grants under the CRLLC Facility, paid $7.0 million in interest,LTIP include CVR Energy’s and terminated the CRLLC Facility.Partnership’s employees, officers, consultants, advisors, and directors.
Credit Agreement
On April 13, 2011, CRNF, as borrower,A summary of phantom unit award activity and CVR Partners, as guarantor, entered into a credit facilitychanges under the LTIP during the year ended December 31, 2020 is presented below:
(in thousands, except per unit data)Units
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Non-vested at December 31, 2019155,707 $30.71 $4,827 
Granted444,385 12.12 
Vested(62,594)31.31 
Forfeited(18,617)31.23 
Non-vested at December 31, 2020518,881 $14.70 $8,312 

Unrecognized compensation expense associated with a group of lenders including Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, as administrative and collateral agent (the "Credit Agreement"). The Credit Agreement included a term loan facility of $125.0 million and a revolving credit facility of $25.0 million with an uncommitted incremental facility of up to $50.0 million. At Marchthe phantom units at December 31, 2016, the effective rate of the term loan2020 was approximately 3.98%. On April 1, 2016,$7.4 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.8 years. Compensation expense recorded for the Partnership repaid all amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreementyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and the Credit Agreement was terminated.
(11) Net Income (Loss) Per Common Unit
The Partnership's net income (loss) is allocated wholly2018 related to the common unitholders as the general partner does not have an economic interest. Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common unit is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common units outstanding during the period and, when applicable, gives effect to unvested common units grantedawards under the CVR Partners LTIP. The commonLTIP was approximately $0.6 million, $2.3 million, and $1.9 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Partnership had a liability of $0.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for cash settled non-vested phantom unit awards and associated distribution equivalent rights. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Partnership paid cash of $0.8 million, $1.7 million, and $1.7 million, respectively, to settle liability-classified awards upon vesting.
December 31, 2020 | 64


Table of Contents
CVR Partners, LP and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Incentive Unit Awards — CVR Energy

CVR Energy grants awards of incentive units issued duringand dividend and distribution equivalent rights to certain of its employees and those of its subsidiaries, including CVR GP, who provide shared services for CVR Energy and its subsidiaries, including the periodPartnership. Costs related to these incentive unit awards are includedallocated to the Partnership based on a weighted-average basistime spent on Partnership business. Total compensation expense allocated to the Partnership for the daysyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 related to the incentive units was $0.4 million, $1.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

The Partnership had 0 separate liabilities related to these incentive unit awards as of December 31, 2020, as the allocation of compensation expense for incentive unit awards is part of the amount charged to the Partnership under the Corporate MSA. The Partnership had a liability of $1.4 million as of December 31, 2019, which is recorded in Other current liabilities. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2018, the Partnership made reimbursements to CVR Energy of $2.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and 0 reimbursementsfor the year ended December 31, 2019 related to its allocated portion of CVR Energy’s incentive unit awards payments. See Note 9 (“Related Party Transactions”) for further discussion of the Corporate MSA.

Performance Unit Awards

In connection with an employment agreement with the Partnership’s Executive Chairman dated November 1, 2017, CVR Energy entered into a performance unit award agreement (the “2017 Performance Unit Award Agreement”) on November 1, 2017, with our Executive Chairman representing the right to receive upon vesting, a cash payment equal to $10.0 million if the average closing price of CVR Energy’s common stock over the 30 day trading period from January 4, 2022 to February 15, 2022 is equal to or greater than $60 per share. Therewere 0compensation costs recognized for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 under the 2017 Performance Unit Award Agreement. Compensation costs recognized for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $0.4 million. Under the 2017 Performance Unit Award Agreement, as of December 31, 2020, the Partnership had 0 outstanding liability, and an outstanding liability of $0.4 million as of December 31, 2019, which they were outstanding.was recorded in Other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2020, there was approximately $2.3 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the 2017 Performance Unit Award Agreement.

(12)Other Benefit Plans
A subsidiary of
CVR Energy sponsors and administers two2 defined contribution 401(k) plans, the CVR Energy 401(k) Plan and the CVR Energy 401(k) Plan for Represented Employees (the "Plans"“Plans”), in which employees of the general partner, CVR Partners and its subsidiaries may participate. Participants in the Plans may elect to contribute a designated percentage of their eligible compensation in accordance with the Plans, subject to statutory limits. The PartnershipCVR Partners provides a matching contribution of 100% of the first 6% of eligible compensation contributed by participants. Participants in theboth Plans are immediately vested in their individual contributions. The Plans provide for a three-year vesting schedule for the Partnership'sPartnership’s matching contributions and contain a provision to count service with predecessor organizations. The Partnership'sPartnership’s contributions under the Plans were approximately $1.6$1.9 million, $1.2$1.8 million, and $0.9$1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively.
The Partnership acquired Effective January 1, 2021, the Rentech Nitrogen GP, LLC Union 401(k) Plan (the "Union Plan") on April 1, 2016. On May 1, 2017, the Union Plan was merged into the CVR Energy 401(k) Plan for Represented Employees. Contributions under the Union Plan were not material.
(13) Commitments and Contingencies
Leases and Unconditional Purchase Obligations
The minimum required payments for operating leases and unconditional purchase obligations are as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
Operating
Leases
 
Unconditional
Purchase 
Obligations
    
 (in thousands)
2018$4,427
 $28,810
20193,678
 15,533
20203,139
 8,285
20212,956
 6,639
20222,461
 6,849
Thereafter578
 46,377
 $17,239
 $112,493
CRNF leases railcars and facilities under long-term operating leases. Lease expense is included in cost of materials and othermatching contributions for the years ended Plans have been suspended.

December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and totaled approximately $4.9 million, $4.9 million and $4.6 2020 | 65


86

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



(8) Commitments
million, respectively.
Supply Commitments

The lease agreements have various remaining terms. Some agreementsminimum required payments for unconditional purchase obligations, including the natural gas purchases outlined below, are renewable, at CRNF's option, for additional periods. It is expected, in the ordinary course of business, that leases may be renewed or replaced as they expire.follows:
(in thousands)
Unconditional
Purchase 
Obligations
Year Ending December 31,
2021$36,132 
202211,207 
20239,540 
20245,006 
20255,006 
Thereafter33,244 
$100,135 

Supply Commitments - The Partnership leases railcars fromis a party to various supply agreements with both related party,and third parties which is included incommit the operating lease commitments shown above. See Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") for further discussion.
CRNF'sPartnership to purchase obligation forminimum volumes of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, pet coke, from a subsidiary of CVR Refining has been derived from a calculation of the average pet coke price paidand natural gas to such subsidiary over the preceding two-year period. See Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") for further discussion of the coke supply agreement.run its plants’ operations.
CRNF
The Partnership is also party to a hydrogen purchase and salenatural gas supply agreement with a subsidiary of CVR Refining, pursuant to which CRNF agrees to pay a monthly fixed fee. See Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions") for further discussion of the hydrogen purchase and sale agreement.
CRNF is party to the Amended and Restated On-Site Product Supply Agreement with The BOC Group, Inc. (as predecessor in interest to Linde LLC). Pursuant to the agreement, which expires in 2020, CRNF is required to take as available and pay for the supply of oxygen and nitrogen to the fertilizer operation. Expenses associated with this agreement are included in direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization), and,various third-parties. Natural gas expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019, and 2015,2018 totaled approximately $4.2$32.4 million, $3.9$33.1 million, and $3.4$42.4 million, respectively.
CRNF is a party to a pet coke supply agreement with HollyFrontier Corporation. The term of this agreement ends in December 2018. The delivered cost of this pet cokerespectively, and is included in costCost of materials and other and totaled approximately $4.0 million, $4.9 million and $4.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
EDNF is a party to a utility service agreement with Jo-Carroll Energy, Inc. The term of this agreement ends in 2019 and includes certain charges on a take-or-pay basis. The cost of utilities is included in direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) and amounts associated with this agreement totaled approximately $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and approximately $6.8 million for the post-acquisition period ended December 31, 2016.
Commitments for natural gas purchases consist of an insignificant amount of variable price contracts as well as the following fixed price contracts:
 December 31,
2017
  
 (in thousands, except weighted average rate)
MMBtus under fixed-price contracts1,548
Commitments to purchase natural gas (1)$4,985
Weighted average rate per MMBtu (1)$3.22

(1)Commitments and weighted average rate per MMBtu is based on the fixed rates applicable to each contract, exclusive of transportation costs.
Litigation
From time to time, the Partnership is involved in various lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, including matters such as those described below under "Environmental, Health, and Safety ("EHS") Matters." Liabilities related to such litigation are recognized when the related costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. It is possible that management's estimates of the outcomes will change within the next year due to uncertainties inherent in litigation and settlement negotiations. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of any other litigation matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's results of operations or financial condition. There can be no assurance that management's beliefs or opinions with respect to liability for potential litigation matters are accurate.
CRNF received a ten year property tax abatement from Montgomery County, Kansas (the "County") in connection with the construction of the Coffeyville Facility that expired on December 31, 2007. In connection with the expiration of the abatement, the County reclassified and reassessed CRNF's nitrogen fertilizer plant for property tax purposes. The reclassification and

87

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


reassessment resulted in an increase in CRNF's annual property tax expense by an average of approximately $10.7 million per year for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, $11.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and $11.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. CRNF protested the classification and resulting valuation for each of those years to the Kansas Board of Tax Appeals ("BOTA"), followed by an appeal to the Kansas Court of Appeals. However, CRNF fully accrued and paid the property taxes the county claimed were owed for the years ended December 31, 2008 through 2012. The Kansas Court of Appeals, in a memorandum opinion dated August 9, 2013, reversed the BOTA decision in part and remanded the case to BOTA, instructing BOTA to classify each asset on an asset by asset basis instead of making a broad determination that CRNF's entire plant was real property as BOTA did originally. The County filed a motion for rehearing with the Kansas Court of Appeals and a petition for review with the Kansas Supreme Court, both of which have been denied.
In March 2015, BOTA concluded that based upon an asset by asset determination, a substantial majority of the assets in dispute will be classified as personal property for the 2008 tax year. The parties stipulated to the value of the real property, following which BOTA issued its final decision. The County has appealed the decision with respect to classification to the Kansas Court of Appeals. No amounts have been received or recognized in these consolidated financial statements related to the 2008 property tax matter or BOTA’s decision.
On February 25, 2013, the County and CRNF agreed to a settlement for tax years 2009 through 2012, which has lowered CRNF's property taxes by about $10.7 million per year (as compared to the 2012 tax year) for tax years 2013 through 2016 based on current mill levy rates. In addition, the settlement provides the County will support CRNF's application before BOTA for a ten year tax exemption for the UAN expansion. Finally, the settlement provides that CRNF will continue its appeal of the 2008 reclassification and reassessment as discussed above. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, CRNF recognized approximately $1.5 million, $1.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively, in property tax expense included in directDirect operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization).
Environmental, Health, and Safety ("EHS") Matters
The Partnership is subject to various stringent federal, state, and local EHS rules and regulations. Liabilities related to EHS matters are recognized when the related costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Estimates of these costs are based upon currently available facts, existing technology, site-specific costs, and currently enacted laws and regulations. In reporting EHS liabilities, no offset is made for potential recoveries.
The Partnership's subsidiaries own and operate two facilities utilized for the manufacture of nitrogen fertilizers. Therefore, the Partnership has exposure to potential EHS liabilities related to past and present EHS conditions at its locations. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and related state laws, certain persons may be liable for the release or threatened release of hazardous substances. These persons can include the current owner or operator of property where a release or threatened release occurred, any persons who owned or operated the property when the release occurred, and any persons who disposed of, or arranged for the transportation or disposal of, hazardous substances at a contaminated property. Liability under CERCLA is strict, and under certain circumstances, joint and several, so that any responsible party may be held liable for the entire cost of investigating and remediating the release of hazardous substances.
The Partnership is also subject to extensive and frequently changing federal, state and local, environmental and health and safety laws and regulations governing the emission and release of hazardous substancesentered into the environment, the treatment and discharge of waste water, and the storage, handling, use and transportation of nitrogen fertilizer products. The ultimate impact of complyingCoffeyville Master Service Agreement (“Coffeyville MSA”) with evolving laws and regulations is not always clearly known or determinable due in part to the fact that the Partnership's operations may change over time and certain implementing regulations for laws, such as the federal Clean Air Act, have not yet been finalized, are under governmental or judicial review or are being revised. These laws and regulations could result in increased capital, operating and compliance costs.
Management periodically reviews and, as appropriate, revises its environmental accruals. Based on current information and regulatory requirements, management believes that the accruals established for environmental expenditures are adequate.
The Partnership believes it is in substantial compliance with existing EHS rules and regulations. There can be no assurance that the EHS matters described above or other EHS matters which may develop in the future will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, or results of operations of the Partnership.

88

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


(14) Related Party Transactions
Related Party Agreements
CVR Partners and its subsidiaries are party to, or otherwise subject to certain agreements with CVR Energy and its subsidiaries, including CVR Refining and its subsidiary Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC, ("CRRM"), that govern the business relationships among each party. The agreements are described as in effect at December 31, 2017, unless otherwise indicated.
Amounts owed to CVR Partners and its subsidiaries froman indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Energy and its subsidiaries with respect(“CRRM”), pursuant to these agreementswhich, it agrees to pay a monthly fee for pet coke purchases. The Partnership’s Coffeyville Facility obtains a significant amount (60% on average during last five years, 33% in 2020) of the pet coke it needs from the Coffeyville MSA. Any remaining pet coke needs are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other long-term assets, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Conversely, amounts owedrequired to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries by CVR Partners and its subsidiaries with respect to these agreements are included in accounts payable, personnel accruals, and accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Partnership's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Feedstock and Shared Services Agreement
CRNF is party to a feedstock and shared services agreement with CRRM under which the two parties provide feedstock and other services to one another. These feedstocks and services are utilized in the respective production processes of CRRM's Coffeyville, Kansas refinery and CRNF's Coffeyville Facility.be purchased from various third parties. The agreement was amended and restated effective January 1, 2017.
Prior to January 1, 2017, CRNF and CRRM transferred hydrogen to one anotherprice paid pursuant to the feedstockCoffeyville MSA is based on the lesser of a pet coke price derived from the price received for UAN (the “UAN-based Price”) or a pet coke price index. The UAN-based Price begins with a pet coke price of $25 per ton based on a price per ton for UAN that excludes transportation cost (“netback price”) of $205 per ton, and shared services agreement. CRNF is not required to sell hydrogen to CRRM if such hydrogen is requiredadjusts up or down $0.50 per ton for operationevery $1.00 change in the netback price. The UAN-based price has a ceiling of $40 per ton and a floor of $5 per ton. See Note 9 (“Related Party Transactions”) for further discussion of the Coffeyville Facility, if such sale would adversely affect the Partnership's classification as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, or if such sale would not be in CRNF's best interest. Net monthly sales of hydrogen to CRRM have been reflected as net sales for CVR Partners, when applicable. Net monthly receipts of hydrogen from CRRM have been reflected in cost of materials and other for CVR Partners, when applicable. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the net sales generated from the sale of hydrogen to CRRM were approximately $3.2 million and $11.8 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2016, CVR Partners also recognized approximately $0.2 million of cost of materials and other relatedMSA.

Pursuant to the transfer of hydrogen fromCoffeyville MSA, the refinery, and a nominal amount was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2016, approximately $0.1 million was included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets associatedPartnership agreed, with net hydrogen purchases.
Beginning January 1, 2017, hydrogen purchases from CRRM are governed pursuantrespect to the hydrogen purchase and sale agreement discussed below, but hydrogen sales to CRRM remain governed pursuant to the feedstock and shared services agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the gross sales generated from the sale of hydrogen to CRRM pursuant to the feedstock and shared services agreement were approximately $0.4 million, which is included in net sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The monthly hydrogen sales are cash settled net on a monthly basis with hydrogen purchases, pursuant to the hydrogen purchase and sale agreement.
The agreement provides that both parties must deliver high-pressure steam to one another under certain circumstances. Net expenses in direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization), during the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $0.2 million related to high-pressure steam. Reimbursements or expenses for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were nominal.
CRNF is obligated to provide to CRRM the oxygen produced by the Linde air separation plant and made available to CRNF to the extent that such oxygen is not required for operation of the Coffeyville Facility. The oxygen is required to meet certain specifications. Approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, was reimbursed by CRRM for the sale of oxygen for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and was included as a reduction to direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization).
Prior to November 1, 2017, the feedstock and shared services agreement provided a mechanism pursuant to which CRNF transferred a tail gas stream to CRRM. Net sales generated from the sale of tail gas to CRRM were nominal during the periods presented. In April 2011, CRRM installed a pipe between the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery and the Coffeyville Facility, to transfer the tail gas. CRNF paid CRRM the cost of installing the pipe and provided an additional 15% to cover the cost of capital, which was due from CRNF to CRRM over four years.
Effective November 1, 2017, the feedstock and shared services agreement was amended to provide a mechanism to transfer a natural gas stream from CRRM to CRNF, and CRNF will no longer transfer tail gas to CRRM. The pipe previously used for

89

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


the transfer of tail gas was altered to exclusively allow for the transportation of natural gas. CRRM will nominate and purchase natural gas transportation and natural gas supplies for CRNF. CRNF will reimbursepay CRRM for the commodity cost of the natural gas and will pay a nominal fee for transportation and maintenance.
At December 31, 2016, there were assets of approximately $0.2 million included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and approximately $0.6 million included in other long-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership recognized $0.6 million loss to write-off the tail gas asset in other income (expense) on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The agreement has an initial term of 20 years, ending in 2031, which will be automatically extended for successive five-year renewal periods. Either party may terminate the agreement, effective upon the last day of a term, by giving notice no later than three years prior to a renewal date. The agreement will also be terminable by mutual consent of the parties or if one party breaches the agreement and does not cure within applicable cure periods and the breach materially and adversely affects the ability of the terminating party to operate its facility. Additionally, the agreement may be terminated in some circumstances if substantially all of the operations at the Coffeyville Facility or the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery are permanently terminated, or if either party is subject to a bankruptcy proceeding or otherwise becomes insolvent.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, receivables of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for amounts yet to be received related to components of the feedstock and shared services agreement other than amounts related to tail gas discussed above. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, current obligations of approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, were included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets associated with unpaid balances related to components of the feedstock and shared services agreement.
Hydrogen Purchase and Sale Agreement
CRNF and CRRM entered into a hydrogen purchase and sale agreement that was effective on January 1, 2017, pursuant to which CRRM agrees to sell and deliver apurchases. The committed hydrogen volume of 90,000 mscf per month, and CRNF agrees to purchase and receive the committed volume. The committed volume pricing is based on a monthly fixed fee (based on the fixed and capital charges associated with producing the committed volume) and a monthly variable fee (based on the natural gas price associated with hydrogen actually received). In the event CRNFthe Coffeyville Facility fails to take delivery of the full committed volume in a month, CRNFthe Partnership remains obligated to pay CRRM for the monthly fixed fee and the monthly variable fee based upon the actual hydrogen volume received, if any. In the event CRRM fails to deliver any portion of the committed volume for the applicable month for any reason other than planned repairs and maintenance, CRNFthe Partnership will be entitled to a pro-rata reduction of the monthly fixed fee. See Note 9 (“Related Party Transactions”) for further discussion.

The Partnership, with respect to the Coffeyville Facility, is also party to the Messer Agreement, pursuant to which, it is required to take as available and pay for the supply of oxygen and nitrogen to the plant. This agreement was renewed and commenced in July 2020 for an initial term of 15 years with annual renewals thereafter. Expenses associated with this agreement are included in Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization), and, for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, totaled approximately $4.2 million, $4.2 million, and $3.8 million, respectively.

In addition to the related party Coffeyville MSA, the Coffeyville Facility has pet coke supply agreements with multiple third-party refineries to purchase approximately 275,000 tons of pet coke at a fixed price for delivery at different dates through December 2021. The Coffeyville Facility has historically purchased third-party pet coke based on spot purchases and supply
December 31, 2020 | 66


Table of Contents
CVR Partners, LP and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

agreements in place at the time. The delivered cost of third-party pet coke purchases is included in Cost of materials and other and totaled approximately $17.9 million, $10.3 million, and $4.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

During 2019, the Partnership, with respect to the East Dubuque Facility, entered into a utility service agreement with a new third-party energy cooperative. The new utility service agreement does not contain purchase commitments. The cost of utilities, including natural gas purchases, is included in Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization). Prior to entering into the new utility service agreement, the East Dubuque Facility had a utility service agreement with a third-party energy cooperative which included certain charges on a take-or-pay basis and amounts associated with this agreement totaled approximately $3.7 million and $10.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

(9) Related Party Transactions

Limited Partnership Agreement

The Partnership’s general partner manages the Partnership’s operations and activities as specified in CVR Partners’ limited partnership agreement. The general partner of the Partnership, CVR GP, is managed by its board of directors. The partnership agreement provides that the Partnership will reimburse CVR GP for all direct and indirect expenses it incurs or payments it makes on behalf of the Partnership, including salary, bonus, incentive compensation, and other amounts paid to any person to perform services for the Partnership or for its general partner in connection with operating the Partnership.

Omnibus Agreement

We are party to an omnibus agreement with CVR Energy and our general partner, pursuant to which we have agreed that CVR Energy will have a preferential right to acquire any assets or group of assets that do not constitute assets used in a fertilizer restricted business. In determining whether to exercise any preferential right under the omnibus agreement, CVR Energy will be permitted to act in its sole discretion, without any fiduciary obligation to us or the unitholders whatsoever. These obligations will continue so long as CVR Energy owns at least 50% of our general partner. There was no activity reported under this agreement during the years ended 2020, 2019, and 2018.

Coffeyville MSA

Effective January 1, 2020, the Conflicts Committee of the Board and the audit committee of CVR Energy approved, and CRNF and CRRM entered into the Coffeyville MSA which is comprised of various supply and service agreements effectively replacing, on substantially equivalent terms, other related party agreements in place during 2019 and 2018 as (the “Replaced Coffeyville Agreements”). In addition to affirming the terms and services described in the Replaced Coffeyville Agreements and resetting the durations thereof, as applicable, commencing January 1, 2020, the Coffeyville MSA provides for monthly payments, subject to netting, for all goods and services supplied under the Coffeyville MSA. The Coffeyville MSA will continue in effect until terminated in writing, in whole or in part, by either party, or until terminated automatically in the event a party falls out of common control with the other party. The Coffeyville MSA provides the following services:

Cross Easements - Both CRNF and CRRM can access and utilize each other’s land in certain circumstances in order to operate their respective businesses.

Hydrogen Purchase and Sale - CRRM agrees to sell and deliver a committed hydrogen volume of 90,000 mscf per month to CRNF and CRNF agrees to purchase and receive the committed volume. CRNF also has the option to purchase excess volume of up to 60,000 mscf per month, or more upon mutual agreement, from CRRM, if availableavailable.

Raw Water and Facilities Sharing - CRNF and CRRM are each owners of an undivided one-half interest in and to the water rights and agree to (i) allocate raw water resources between CVR Energy’s Coffeyville Refinery and our Coffeyville Facility and (ii) provide for purchase.
A portionthe management of the monthly variable fee, as defined inwater intake system which draws raw water from the terms of the agreement, is determined according to the natural gas costs incurred by CRRM in operation of the hydrogen plant, which will reflect market-driven changes in the natural gas prices. In addition, certain fixed fees will be adjusted on an annual basis according to the changes in a cost index, as defined in the terms of the agreement.Verdigris River for both our Coffeyville Facility and CVR Energy’s Coffeyville Refinery.
CRRM is not required to sell hydrogen to CRNF if such sale would adversely affect CVR Refining’s classification as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, and is not required to sell hydrogen to CRNF in excess of the committed volume if such volumes are needed for CRRM’s operations.
The agreement has an initial term of 20 years and will be automatically extended following the initial term for additional successive five-year renewal terms unless either party gives 180 days' written notice. Certain fees under the agreement are subject to modification after this initial term. The agreement contains customary terms related to indemnification, as well as termination for breach, by mutual consent, or due to insolvency or cessation of operations.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the cost of hydrogen purchases from CRRM was approximately $4.2 million, which was included in cost of materials and other in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The monthly hydrogen purchases are cash settled net on a monthly basis with hydrogen sales pursuant to the feedstock and shared services agreement. At December 31, 2017, current obligations, net of any amounts due to CRNF under the feedstock and shared services agreement for hydrogen, of approximately $0.3 million were included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets associated with net hydrogen purchases from CRRM.

90

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Coke Supply Agreement
CRNF is party to a- Our Coffeyville Facility purchases pet coke supply agreement with CRRM pursuant tofrom CVR Energy’s Coffeyville Refinery which CRRM supplies CRNF with pet coke. This agreement provides that CRRM must deliver, to CRNFand the Coffeyville Facility must purchase, during each calendar year an annual required amount of pet coke equal to the lesser of (i) 100 percent of the pet coke produced at CRRM's Coffeyville, Kansas petroleum refinery or (ii) 500,000 tons of pet coke. CRNF is also obligated to purchase this annual required amount. If during a
December 31, 2020 | 67


Table of Contents
CVR Partners, LP and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

calendar month, CRRM produces more than 41,667 tons of pet coke is produced and available for purchase, then CRNFthe Coffeyville Facility will have the option to purchase the excess at the purchase price provided for in the agreement. If CRNF declines to exercise thisthe option is declined, CRRM may sell the excess to a third party.third-party.
CRNF obtains most (over 70% on average during the last five years) of the pet coke it needs from CRRM's adjacent crude oil refinery pursuant to the pet coke supply agreement,
Feedstock and procures the remainder through a contract with HollyFrontier Corporation and on the open market. The price CRNF pays pursuant to the pet coke supply agreement is based on the lesser of a pet coke price derived from the price received for UAN (the "UAN-based price") or a pet coke price index. The UAN-based price begins with a pet coke price of $25 per ton based on a price per ton for UAN that excludes transportation cost ("netback price") of $205 per ton, and adjusts up or down $0.50 per ton for every $1.00 change in the netback price. The UAN-based price has a ceiling of $40 per ton and a floor of $5 per ton.
CRNF will pay any taxes associated with the sale, purchase, transportation, delivery, storage or consumption of the pet coke. CRNF is entitled to offset any amount payable for the pet coke against any amount due from CRRM under the feedstock and shared services agreement between the parties.
The agreement has an initial term of 20 years, ending in 2027, which will be automatically extended for successive five-year renewal periods. Either party may terminate the agreement by giving notice no later than three years prior to a renewal date. The agreement is also terminable by mutual consent of the parties or if a party breaches the agreement and does not cure within applicable cure periods. Additionally, the agreement may be terminated in some circumstances if substantially all of the operations at the Coffeyville Facility or the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery are permanently terminated, or if either party is subject to a bankruptcy proceeding or otherwise becomes insolvent.
The cost of pet coke associated with the transfer of pet coke from CRRM to CRNF were approximately $2.0 million, $2.1 million and $6.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which was recorded in cost of materials and other on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Payables of $0.1 million related to the coke supply agreement were included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets both as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Environmental Agreement
CRNF entered into an environmental agreement with CRRM which provides for certain indemnification and access rights in connection with environmental matters affecting the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery and the Coffeyville Facility. Generally, bothShared Services - CRNF and CRRM have agreedprovide feedstock and other services to indemnifyone another. These feedstocks and defend each otherservices are utilized in the respective production processes of CRRM’s Coffeyville Refinery and each other's affiliates against liabilities associated withour Coffeyville Facility. Feedstocks provided under the agreement include, among others, hydrogen, high-pressure steam, nitrogen, instrument air, oxygen, and natural gas.

Lease - CRNF leases certain hazardous materialsoffice and violations of environmental laws that are a result of or caused bylaboratory space from CRRM.

Corporate MSA

Also effective January 1, 2020, the indemnifying party's actions or business operations. This obligation extends to indemnification for liabilities arising out of off-site disposal of certain hazardous materials. Indemnification obligationsConflicts Committee of the Board and the audit committee of CVR Energy approved, and the parties will be reducedentered into the Corporate MSA between CVR Services and certain of its affiliates, including CVR Energy, CVR GP and the Partnership and its subsidiaries, which is comprised of various management and service agreements effectively replacing other related party agreements, on substantially equivalent terms, in place for 2019 and 2018 as (the “Replaced Corporate Agreements”). In addition to affirming the terms and services described in the Replaced Corporate Agreements and resetting the durations thereof, as applicable, commencing January 1, 2020, the Corporate MSA provides for payment by applicable amounts recovered byeach service recipient under the Corporate MSA of a monthly fee for goods and services supplied under the Corporate MSA, subject to netting and an indemnified party from third parties or from insurance coverage.annual true up, as well as pass-through of any direct costs incurred on behalf of a service recipient without markup.
The term of
Under the agreement is for at least 20 years, ending in 2027, or for so long asCorporate MSA, CVR GP and the feedstockPartnership and shared services agreement is in force, whichever is longer.
Services Agreement
CVR Partners obtainsits subsidiaries obtain certain management and other professional services from CVR Energy pursuant to a services agreement between the Partnership, CVR GP and CVR Energy. Under this agreement, the general partner has engaged CVR Energy to provide certain services,Services, including the following, among others:
services from CVR Energy'sServices’ employees in capacities equivalent to the capacities of corporate executive officers, except that those who serve in such capacities under the agreement will serve the Partnership on a shared, part-time basis only, unless the Partnership and CVR EnergyServices agree otherwise;
administrative and professional services, including legal, accounting, SEC and securities exchangeSOX compliance, financial reporting, human resources, information technology, communications, insurance, tax, credit, finance, corporate compliance, enterprise risk management, consulting, and government and regulatory affairs;

91

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


recommendations on capital raising activities to the board of directors of the general partner, including the issuance of debt or equity interests, the entry into credit facilities, and other capital market transactions;
managing or overseeing litigation and administrative or regulatory proceedings, investigations and other reviews in the ordinary course of business or operations, establishing appropriate insurance policies for the Partnership, and providing safety and environmental advice;
recommending the payment of distributions; and
managing or providing advice for other projects, including acquisitions, as may be agreed by the general partner and CVR EnergyServices from time to time.
As payment for services provided underpermitting the agreement, the Partnership, its general partner or its subsidiaries must pay CVR Energy (i) all costs incurred by CVR Energy or its affiliates in connection with the employment of its employees who provide the Partnership services under the agreement on a full-time basis, but excluding certain share-based compensation; (ii) a prorated share of costs incurred by CVR Energy or its affiliates in connection with the employment of its employees who provide the Partnership services under the agreement on a part-time basis, but excluding certain share-based compensation, and such prorated share shall be determined by CVR Energy on a commercially reasonable basis, based on the percentage of total working time that such shared personnel are engaged in performing services for the Partnership; (iii) a prorated share of certain administrative costs, including office costs, services by outside vendors, other sales, general and administrative costs and depreciation and amortization; and (iv) various other administrative costs in accordance with the termsuse of the agreement, including travel, insurance, legal and audit services, government and public relations and bank charges.
Either CVR Energy or the Partnership's general partner may temporarily or permanently exclude any particular service from the scope of the agreement upon 180 days' notice. The Partnership's general partner may terminate the agreement upon at least 180 days' notice, but not more than one year's notice. Furthermore, the Partnership's general partner may terminate the agreement immediately if CVR Energy becomes bankrupt or dissolves or commences liquidation or winding-up procedures.
In order to facilitate the carrying out of services under the agreement, CVR Partners and CVR Energy have granted one another certain royalty-free, non-exclusive and non-transferable rights to use one another's intellectual property under certain circumstances.
The agreement also contains an indemnity provision whereby the Partnership, its general partner, and the Partnership's subsidiaries, as indemnifying parties, agree to indemnify CVR Energy and its affiliates (other than the indemnifying parties themselves) against losses and liabilities incurred in connection with the performance of services under the agreement or any breach of the agreement, unless such losses or liabilities arise from a breach of the agreementCVR Partners trademarks by CVR Energy or other misconduct on its part, as provided inGP and the agreement. The agreement contains a provision stating that CVR Energy is an independent contractor under the agreement and nothing in the agreement may be construed to impose an implied or express fiduciary duty owed by CVR Energy, on the one hand, to the recipients of services under the agreement, on the other hand. The agreement prohibits recovery of lost profits or revenue, or special, incidental, exemplary, punitive or consequential damages from CVR Energy or certain affiliates.Partnership at no cost.
Net amounts incurred under the services agreement for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
 (in thousands)
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)$3,061
 $3,583
 $3,500
Selling, general and administrative expenses12,924
 11,761
 10,735
Total$15,985
 $15,344
 $14,235

For services performed in connection with the services agreement, the Partnership recognized personnel costs, excluding amounts related to share based compensation that are disclosed in(refer to Note 4 ("Share‑Based Compensation"7 (“Share-Based Compensation”)), of $6.5$6.6 million, $6.9$7.3 million, and $5.7$6.6 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019, and 2015. At 2018.

December 31, 2017 and 2016, payables of $4.0 million and $3.5 million, respectively, were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with respect to amounts billed in accordance with the services agreement.2020 | 68


92

Table of Contents
CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



Related Party Activity
GP Services Agreement
The Partnership is party to a GP Services Agreement dated November 29, 2011 and subsequently amended between the Partnership, CVR GP and CVR Energy. This agreement allows CVR Energy to engage CVR GP, in its capacity as the Partnership's general partner, to provide CVR Energy with (i) business development and related services and (ii) advice or recommendations for such other projects as may be agreed between the Partnership's general partner and CVR Energy from time to time. As payment for certain specific services provided under the agreement, CVR Energy must pay a prorated share of costs incurred by the Partnership or its general partner in connectionActivity associated with the employment of the certain employees who provide CVR Energy services on a part-time basis, as determined by the Partnership's general partner on a commercially reasonable basis based on the percentage of total working time that such shared personnel are engaged in performing services for CVR Energy. CVR Energy is not required to directly pay any compensation, salaries, bonuses or benefits to any of the Partnership's or general partner's employees who provide services to CVR Energy on a full-time or part-time basis, thus the Partnership will continue to pay their compensation.
Either CVR Energy or the Partnership's general partner may temporarily or permanently exclude any particular service from the scope of the agreement upon 180 days' notice. The Partnership's general partner also has the right to delegate the performance of some or all of the services to be provided pursuant to the agreement to one of its affiliates or any other person or entity, though such delegation does not relieve the Partnership's general partner from its obligations under the agreement. Either CVR Energy or the Partnership's general partner may terminate the agreement upon at least 180 days' notice, but not more than one year's notice. Furthermore, CVR Energy may terminate the agreement immediately if the Partnership, or its general partner, become bankrupt, or dissolve and commence liquidation or winding-up.
Limited Partnership Agreement
The Partnership's general partner manages the Partnership's operations and activities as specified in the partnership agreement. The general partner of the Partnership is managed by its board of directors. CRLLC has the right to select the directors of the general partner. Actions by the general partner that are made in its individual capacity are made by CRLLC as the sole member of the general partner and not by its board of directors. The members of the board of directors of the general partner are not elected by the unitholders and are not subject to re-election on a regular basis in the future. The officers of the general partner manage the day-to-day affairs of the Partnership's business.
The partnership agreement provides that the Partnership will reimburse its general partner for all direct and indirect expenses it incurs or payments it makes on behalf of the Partnership (including salary, bonus, incentive compensation and other amounts paid to any person to perform services for the Partnership or for its general partner in connection with operating the Partnership). Pursuant to the partnership agreement, the Partnership incurred approximately $3.3 million, $4.0 million and $3.9 million,Partnership’s related party arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019, and 2015, respectively,2018 is summarized below:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Sales to related parties (1)$993 $119 $371 
Purchases from related parties (2)22,365 30,876 27,315 

December 31,
20202019
Prepaid expenses (3)$$249 
Due to related parties (4)1,446 7,826

(1)Sales to related parties, included in Net sales, consist primarily of sales of feedstocks and services to CRRM under the Coffeyville MSA.
(2)Purchases from related parties, included in Cost of materials and other, Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization), and Selling, general and administrative expenses, consist primarily of pet coke and hydrogen purchased from CRRM under the Coffeyville MSA.
(3)Prepaid expenses, included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets, are amounts paid for personnel costsfeedstocks and services provided by CRRM under the Coffeyville MSA.
(4)Due to related parties, included in Accounts payable to affiliates, Other current liabilities, and Other long-term liabilities, consist primarily of amounts payable for feedstocks and other supplies and services provided by CRRM and CVR Services under the Coffeyville MSA and Corporate MSA.

Environmental Agreement

Our Coffeyville Facility is a party to an environmental agreement with CRRM which provides for certain indemnification and access rights in connection with environmental matters affecting CVR Energy’s Coffeyville refinery and our Coffeyville Facility. To the extent that liability arises from environmental contamination that is caused by CRRM but is also commingled with environmental contamination caused by our Coffeyville Facility, CRRM may elect, in its sole discretion and at its own cost and expense, to perform government mandated environmental activities relating to such liability, subject to certain conditions and provided that CRRM will not waive any rights to indemnification or compensation of executives atotherwise provided for in the general partner, who manage the Partnership's business. Atagreement. NaN liability under this agreement was recorded as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, amounts due2019.

Terminal and Operating Agreement

Our Coffeyville Facility entered into a lease and operating agreement with Coffeyville Resources Terminal, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of $1.5 millionCVR Energy (“CRT”), under which it leases the premises located at Phillipsburg, Kansas to be utilized as a UAN terminal. The initial term of the agreement will expire in May 2032, provided, however, we may terminate the lease at any time during the initial term by providing 180 days prior written notice. In addition, this agreement will automatically renew for successive five-year terms, provided that we may terminate the agreement during any renewal term with at least 180 days written notice. We will pay CRT $1.00 per year for rent, $4.00 per ton of UAN placed into the terminal, and $2.0 million, respectively, were included$4.00 per ton of UAN taken out of the terminal.

Property Exchange

On October 18, 2019, the Conflicts Committee of the Board and on October 22, 2019, the audit committee of CVR Energy, each agreed to authorize the exchange of certain parcels of property owned by subsidiaries of CVR Energy with an equal number of parcels owned by subsidiaries of CVR Partners, all located in personnel accruals onCoffeyville, Kansas (the “Property Exchange”). On February 19, 2020, a subsidiary of CVR Energy and a subsidiary of CVR Partners executed the Consolidated Balance Sheets with respectProperty Exchange agreement. This Property Exchange will enable each such subsidiary to amounts outstandingcreate a more usable, contiguous parcel of land near its own operating footprint. CVR Energy and the Partnership accounted for this transaction in accordance with the limited partnership agreement.
Railcar Lease Agreement and Maintenance
In the second quarter of 2016, CRNF entered into agreements to lease a total of 115 UAN railcars from American Railcar Leasing, LLC ("ARL"ASC Topic 805-50, Business Combinations (“ Topic 805-50”), guidance on transferring assets between entities under common control. This transaction had a company that was controlled by IEP, which will expire in 2023. Innet impact to the first quarterPartnership’s partners’ capital of 2017, ARI Leasing, LLC ("ARI"), a company controlled by IEP, assumed the lease from ARL. In the second quarter of 2017, CRNF entered into an agreement to lease an additional 70 UAN railcars from ARI which will expire in 2022. The Partnership received the additional 70 leased railcars during the second half of 2017. For the years ended less than $0.1 million.
December 31, 2017 and 2016, rent expense of approximately $1.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively, was recorded in cost of materials and other in the Consolidated Statement of Operations related to these agreements.2020 | 69
American Railcar Industries, Inc., a company controlled by IEP, performed railcar maintenance for CRNF and the expense associated with this maintenance was approximately $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and was included in cost of materials and other in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

93

CVR PARTNERS,Partners, LP AND SUBSIDIARIESand Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)




Insight Portfolio Group Distributions to CVR Partners’ Unitholders
Insight Portfolio Group LLC ("Insight Portfolio Group") is an entity formed by Mr. Carl C. Icahn in order to maximize the potential buying power of a group of entities with which Mr. Icahn
The Board has a relationship in negotiating withpolicy for the Partnership to distribute all available cash generated on a wide rangequarterly basis. Cash distributions are made to the common unitholders of suppliersrecord on the applicable record date, generally within 60 days after the end of goods, serviceseach quarter. Available cash for each quarter is determined by the Board following the end of such quarter.

Distributions, if any, including the payment, amount, and tangible and intangible propertytiming thereof, are subject to change at negotiated rates. In January 2013, CVR Energy acquired a minority equity interest in Insight Portfolio Group. The Partnership participates in Insight Portfolio Group’s buying group through its relationship with CVR Energy. The Partnership may purchase a variety of goods and services as membersthe discretion of the buying group at prices and on terms that management believes would be more favorable than those which would be achieved on a stand-alone basis. Transactions with Insight Portfolio Group for each of the reporting periodsBoard. There were nominal.
CRLLC Facility
In April 2016,0 distributions declared or paid by the Partnership borrowed $300.0 million under the CRLLC Facility. On June 10, 2016, the Partnership paid off the $300.0 million outstanding under the CRLLC Facility, paid $7.0 million in interest, and terminated the CRLLC Facility. See Note 10 ("Debt") for further discussion.
Parent Affiliate Units
Subsequent to the East Dubuque Merger, the Partnership purchased 400,000 CVR Nitrogen common units from CVR Energy during the second quarter of 2016 for $5.0 million. See Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger") for further discussion.
(15) Major Customers and Suppliers
Sales of nitrogen fertilizer to major customers, as a percentage of total net sales, were as follows:
 December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Nitrogen Fertilizer     
Customer A5% 10% 10%
Customer B11% 10% 14%
 16% 20% 24%
The Partnership maintains contracts with CVR Energy and its affiliates. See Note 14 ("Related Party Transactions").
CRNF currently buys several key raw materials for the Coffeyville Facility through a single supplier, Linde, which owns, operates and maintains an air separation plant. The inability of Linde to perform in accordance with its contractual obligations could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's results of operations, financial condition and ability to make cash distributions. CVR Energy maintains, for the Partnership's benefit, contingent business interruption insurance with a $200.0 million limit for any interruption caused by physical damage to the air separation plant that results in a loss of production from an insured peril.
The East Dubuque operations depend on the availability of natural gas. The East Dubuque Facility has an agreement with Nicor, Inc., pursuant to which the facility accesses natural gas from the ANR Pipeline Company and Northern Natural Gas pipelines. Access to satisfactory supplies of natural gas through Nicor could be disrupted due to a number of causes, including volume limitations under the agreement, pipeline malfunctions, service interruptions, mechanical failures or other reasons.

94

CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


(16) Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited):
Summarized quarterly financial data foryear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Quarter
 First Second Third Fourth
        
 (in thousands, except per unit data)
Net sales$85,321
 $97,896
 $69,393
 $78,192
Operating costs and expenses:       
Cost of materials and other – Affiliates2,146
 1,664
 1,774
 1,889
Cost of materials and other – Third parties19,591
 20,477
 17,721
 19,612
 21,737
 22,141
 19,495
 21,501
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) – Affiliates832
 1,038
 978
 1,029
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) – Third parties35,078
 36,783
 39,290
 40,502
 35,910
 37,821
 40,268
 41,531
Depreciation and amortization15,412
 19,982
 19,483
 19,109
Cost of sales73,059
 79,944
 79,246
 82,141
        
Selling, general and administrative expenses – Affiliates3,886
 3,596
 3,917
 4,216
Selling, general and administrative expenses – Third parties3,028
 2,158
 2,166
 2,663
 6,914
 5,754
 6,083
 6,879
Total operating costs and expenses79,973
 85,698
 85,329
 89,020
Operating income (loss)5,348
 12,198
 (15,936) (10,828)
Other income (expense):       
Interest expense and other financing costs(15,706) (15,696) (15,737) (15,756)
Interest income3
 13
 14
 20
Other income, net42
 16
 22
 (585)
Total other expense(15,661) (15,667) (15,701) (16,321)
Loss before income tax expense (benefit)(10,313) (3,469) (31,637) (27,149)
Income tax expense (benefit)23
 (24) (35) 256
Net loss$(10,336) $(3,445) $(31,602) $(27,405)
Net loss per common unit – basic and diluted$(0.09) $(0.03) $(0.28) $(0.24)
Weighted-average common units outstanding:       
Basic and diluted113,283
 113,283
 113,283
 113,283

95

CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Quarter
 First Second Third Fourth
        
 (in thousands, except per unit data)
Net sales$73,092
 $119,797
 $78,474
 $84,921
Operating costs and expenses:       
Cost of materials and other – Affiliates821
 536
 529
 758
Cost of materials and other – Third parties15,560
 35,513
 19,282
 20,794
 16,381
 36,049
 19,811
 21,552
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) – Affiliates852
 1,249
 1,106
 1,017
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) – Third parties22,838
 52,895
 31,460
 36,851
 23,690
 54,144
 32,566
 37,868
Depreciation and amortization6,976
 17,559
 16,452
 17,259
Cost of sales47,047
 107,752
 68,829
 76,679
        
Selling, general and administrative expenses – Affiliates3,462
 3,917
 3,560
 4,050
Selling, general and administrative expenses – Third parties2,930
 4,426
 3,701
 3,230
 6,392
 8,343
 7,261
 7,280
Total operating costs and expenses53,439
 116,095
 76,090
 83,959
Operating income19,653
 3,702
 2,384
 962
Other income (expense):       
Interest expense and other financing costs(1,635) (15,552) (15,633) (15,737)
Interest income2
 2
 
 2
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt
 (5,116) 
 254
Other income, net23
 34
 26
 20
Total other expense(1,610) (20,632) (15,607) (15,461)
Income (loss) before income tax expense18,043
 (16,930) (13,223) (14,499)
Income tax expense1
 76
 207
 45
Net income (loss)$18,042
 $(17,006) $(13,430) $(14,544)
Net income (loss) per common unit – basic and diluted$0.25
 $(0.15) $(0.12) $(0.13)
Weighted-average common units outstanding:       
Basic and diluted73,128
 113,283
 113,283
 113,283

Factors Impacting the Comparability of Quarterly Results of Operations
During the third quarter of 2017, the East Dubuque Facility experienced eight days of unplanned downtime due2020 related to an exchanger outage at the East Dubuque Facility. During the fourth quarter of 2017,2019 or the East Dubuque Facility experienced approximately 12 daysfirst, second, and third quarters of unplanned downtime due to2020. NaN distributions were declared for the fourth quarter of 2020.

The Partnership paid distributions totaling $4.00 per common unit on a refractory failing in the piping at the East Dubuque Facility. Repair costs for these unplanned outages were not material. Overall resultssplit-adjusted basis, or $45.3 million during the respective quarter were negatively impacted dueyear ended December 31, 2019. Of these distributed amounts, CVR Energy received $15.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Partnership did 0t pay distributions.

(10) Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Cash flows related to the lost production during the downtime that resulted in reduced salesincome taxes, interest, leases, and certain reduced variable expensescapital expenditures included in cost of materialsaccounts payable are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds$69 $40 $26 
Cash paid for interest59,850 60,057 60,168 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities (1):
Operating cash flows from operating leases4,117 4,019 
Operating cash flows from finance leases6 20 
Financing cash flows from finance leases100 321 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Change in capital expenditures included in accounts payable$(2,167)$1,618 $(1,031)

(1)The lease standard was adopted on January 1, 2019 on a prospective basis. Therefore, only 2020 and other and direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization). 2019 are applicable to be included within the table above.
Scheduled full facility turnarounds occurred at the East Dubuque Facility during the third quarter of 2017 and during the second quarter of 2016. See Note 2 ("Summary of Significant Accounting Policies") for a discussion of turnarounds.
On April 1, 2016, the Partnership completed the East Dubuque Merger, whereby the Partnership acquired the East Dubuque Facility. The consolidated financial statements include the results of the East Dubuque Facility beginning on April 1, 2016, the date of the closing of the acquisition. See Note 3 ("East Dubuque Merger") for further discussion.


96
December 31, 2020 | 70


CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


During the second quarter of 2016, the Partnership executed multiple financing transactions, including the issuance of $645.0 million aggregate principal of 9.250% 2023 Notes to refinance the substantial majority of its existing debt. As a result of the financing transactions, the Partnership recognized $5.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. Also as a result of the financing transactions, the Partnership's interest expense increased during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and subsequent quarters, as compared to the prior quarters. Further discussion regarding the Partnership's indebtedness can be found in Note 10 ("Debt").

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

As of December 31, 2017, we have2020, the Partnership has evaluated, under the direction of ourthe Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief FinancialAccounting Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, ourthe Partnership’s Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we filefiled or submitsubmitted under the Exchange Act is accurately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC'sSEC’s rules and forms, and that suchforms. Such information is accumulated and communicated to the Partnership'sPartnership’s management, including ourthe Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief FinancialAccounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    Our

The Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in the 2013 Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"(“COSO”). Based on that evaluation, ourthe Partnership’s Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief FinancialAccounting Officer have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. Our2020. The Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm, that audited the consolidated financial statements included herein under Item 8, has issued a report on the effectiveness of ourthe Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. This report can be found under Item 8.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There hashave been no changechanges in the Partnership'sPartnership’s internal control over financial reporting required by Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20172020 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership'sPartnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Despite many of our employees working in a remote environment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have not experienced any material impact to our internal controls over financial reporting. We are continually monitoring and assessing the COVID-19 pandemic to determine any potential impact on the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B.    Other Information

None.


December 31, 2020 | 71


PART III

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Management of CVR Partners, LP
Our
As a publicly traded partnership, we are managed by our general partner, CVR GP, LLC, manages our operations and activitieseither directly by its board of directors (the “Board”), by its executive officers (who are appointed by the Board) or by its sole member, CVR Services, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of CVR Energy, subject to the terms and conditions specified in our partnership agreement. Our general partner is owned by CRLLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Energy. The operations ofLimited partners are not entitled to directly or indirectly participate in our management or operation. Neither our general partner nor the members of its Board are elected by our unitholders, and none are subject to re-election on a regular basis in its capacity as general partner are managed by its board of directors. the future.

Actions by our general partner that are made in its individual capacity are made by CRLLCCVR Services as the sole member of our general partner and not by the board of directors of our general partner. Our general partner is not elected by our unitholders and is not subject to re-election on a regular basis in the future. The officers of our general partner manage the day-to-day affairs of our business.
Limited partners are not entitled to elect the directors of our general partner or directly or indirectly participate in our management or operation.Board. Our partnership agreement contains various provisions which replace default fiduciary duties with more limited contractual corporate governance standards. Our general partner is liable, as a general partner, for all of our debts (to the extent not paid from our assets), except for indebtedness or other obligations that are made expressly non-recourse to it. Our general partner therefore may cause us to incur indebtedness or other obligations that are non-recourse to it. Our debt instruments are non-recourse to our general partner.
As a publicly traded partnership, we qualify for certain exemptions from the NYSE's corporate governance requirements. Our general partner's board of directors has not and does not currently intend to establish a nominating/corporate governance committee. Additionally, a majority of the directors of our general partner do not need to be independent, and the compensation committee of the board of directors of our general partner does not need to be composed entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, unitholders do not have the same protections afforded to equityholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.
The board of directors of our general partner initially consisted of eleven directors in 2017, but currently consists of eight directors, three of whom the board has affirmatively determined are independent in accordance with the rules of the NYSE (Donna R. Ecton, Frank M. Muller, Jr. and Peter K. Shea). The board of directors of our general partner met four times in 2017. All of the directors who served during 2017 attended at least 75% of the total meetings of the board of directors of our general partner and each of the committees on which such director served during their respective tenure on the board, except for Eric D. Karp who was absent for the one meeting that took place while he was on the board of directors. Keith B. Forman resigned from the board on March 8, 2017, Mr. Karp resigned from the board on April 3, 2017 and SungHwan Cho resigned from the board on April 7, 2017.
The board of directors of our general partner has established an audit committee. During 2017, the audit committee was comprised of Donna R. Ecton (chairman), Frank M. Muller, Jr. and Peter K. Shea. Each of the members of the audit committee meets the independence and experience standards established by the NYSE and the Exchange Act. The audit committee's responsibilities are to (i) appoint, terminate, retain, compensate and oversee the work of the independent registered public accounting firm, (ii) pre-approve all audit, review and attest services and permitted non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, (iii) oversee the performance of the Partnership's internal audit function, (iv) evaluate the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, (v) review external and internal audit reports and management's responses thereto, (vi) oversee the integrity of the financial reporting process, system of internal accounting controls, and financial statements and reports of the Partnership, (vii) review the Partnership's annual and quarterly financial statements, including disclosures made in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" set forth in periodic reports filed with the SEC, (viii) oversee the receipt, investigation, resolution and retention of all complaints submitted under the whistleblower policy, and (ix) otherwise comply with its responsibilities and duties as stated in its audit committee charter. The board of directors has determined that Ms. Ecton qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert," as defined by applicable rules of the SEC, and that each member of the audit committee is "financially literate" under the requirements of the NYSE. The audit committee met four times in 2017.
In addition, the board of directors of our general partner has established a conflicts committee. During 2017, the conflicts committee was comprised of Donna R. Ecton (chairman) and Frank M. Muller, Jr.. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, the board may, but is not required to, seek the approval of the conflicts committee whenever a conflict arises between our general partner or its affiliates, on the one hand, and us or any public unitholder, on the other. The conflicts committee may then determine whether the resolution of the conflict of interest is in the best interest of the Partnership. The members of the conflicts committee may not be officers or employees of our general partner or directors, officers or employees of its affiliates, and must meet the independence standards established by the NYSE and the Exchange Act to serve on an audit committee of a board of directors. Any matters approved by the conflicts committee are conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to us,

approved by all of our partners and not a breach by the general partner of any duties it may owe us or our unitholders. The conflicts committee met two times in 2017.
The board of directors of our general partner has also created a compensation committee. During 2017, the compensation committee was comprised of Frank M. Muller, Jr. (chairman) and Andrew Langham. The compensation committee (i) establishes policies and periodically determines matters involving executive compensation, (ii) grants or recommends the grant of equity awards under the CVR Partners LTIP, (iii) provides counsel regarding key personnel selection, (iv) may elect to retain independent compensation consultants, (v) recommends to the board of directors the structure of non-employee director compensation and (vi) assists the board of directors in assessing any risks to the Partnership associated with employee compensation practices and policies. In addition, the compensation committee reviews and discusses our Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and produces a report on executive compensation for inclusion in our annual report on Form 10-K in compliance with applicable federal securities laws. The compensation committee met one time in 2017.
The board of directors of our general partner has created an environmental, health and safety committee. During 2017, the environmental, health and safety committee was comprised of Peter K. Shea (chairman), Donna R. Ecton, Frank M. Muller, Jr. and Mark A. Pytosh. The environmental, health and safety committee's responsibilities are to provide oversight with respect to management's establishment and administration of environmental, health and safety policies, programs, procedures and initiatives. The environmental, health and safety committee met one time in 2017.
Whenever our general partner makes a determination or takes or declines to take an action in its individual, rather than representative, capacity, it is entitled to make such determination or to take or decline to take such other action free of any fiduciary duty or obligation whatsoever to us, any limited partner or assignee, and it is not required to act in good faith or pursuant to any other standard imposed by our partnership agreement or under Delaware law or any other law. Examples include the exercise or assignment of its call right or its registration rights, its voting rights with respect to the units it owns and its determination whether or not to consent to any merger or consolidation of the Partnership. Actions byOur general partner is liable, as a general partner, for all of our general partnerdebts (to the extent not paid from our assets), except for indebtedness or other obligations that are made in its individual capacityexpressly non-recourse to it. Our debt instruments are madenon-recourse to our general partner. Our general partner therefore may cause us to incur indebtedness or other obligations that are non-recourse to it.

The Board

During 2020, the Board consisted of three directors affirmatively determined by CRLLC, the sole memberBoard to be independent, non-employee directors (Donna R. Ecton, Frank M. Muller, Jr. and Peter K. Shea); three non-employee directors who are also officers of Icahn Enterprises L.P. (“IEP”) (Johnathan Frates, Andrew Langham and Hunter C. Gary); as well as two directors who are also executive officers of our general partner not(David L. Lamp, our Executive Chairman, and Mark A. Pytosh, our President and Chief Executive Officer). The Board is led by its boardChairman of the Board, Mr. Lamp. As required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board oversees the business of the Partnership, including its fundamental financial and business strategies and major corporate actions, significant risks facing the Partnership and its risk management activities and the Partnership’s Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) initiatives. The Board also periodically evaluates its composition, including the skill sets, diversity, leadership structure, background and experience of its directors. The Board believes its current structure and composition is best for the Partnership and its unitholders at this time. All actions of the Board, other than any matters delegated to a committee, will require approval by majority vote of the directors, with each director having one vote. The directors of our general partner hold office until the earlier of their death, resignation or removal. The Board met four times in 2020 and acted three times by written consent. All of the directors who served during 2020 attended at least 75% of the total meetings of the Board and each of the committees on which such director served during their respective tenure except for Mr. Langham who attended all of the meetings of the committees on which he served and at least 50% of the total meetings of the Board.


December 31, 2020 | 72


The following table sets forth the names, positions, ages, and a description of the backgrounds, experience, and qualifications of our directors, as of February 22, 2021:

Name, Position and AgePrincipal Occupation, Experience and Qualifications
David L. Lamp
Executive Chairman and
Chairman of the Board
Age 63

Current Public Company Directorships:
CVR Partners (2018 to Current)
CVR Energy (2018 to Current)
Mr. Lamp has served as Executive Chairman of our general partner since January 2018, Chairman of the Board since 2018, as Chief Executive Officer and President of CVR Energy since December 2017, and as a Director of CVR Energy, since January 2018. Mr. Lamp has more than 40 years of technical, commercial and operational experience in the refining and chemical industries. He previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Western Refining, Inc., from 2016 until its sale to Andeavor in 2017; as President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the general partner of Northern Tier Energy, L.P. from 2013 until its merger with Western Refining in 2016; and as a Director of CVR Refining, LP, from January 2018 to February 2019. Mr. Lamp serves on the Board of Directors of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers Association and is a past Chairman. Mr. Lamp graduated from Michigan State University with a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering. We believe Mr. Lamp's extensive knowledge and experience in the refining and chemical industries, as well as his significant background serving in key executive roles at public and private companies and strong leadership skills make him well qualified to serve as our director.

Former Public Company Directorships:CVR Refining (2018 to 2019) and Northern Tier Energy, LP (2013 to 2016)
Mark A. Pytosh
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
Age 56

Current Public Company Directorships:
CVR Partners (2011 to Current)

Mr. Pytosh has served as Chief Executive Officer and President of our general partner since May 2014, as our director since 2011, and as Executive Vice President of CVR Energy since October 2014. Previously, Mr. Pytosh served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Alberta, Canada-based Tervita Corporation, an environmental and energy services company, from 2010 to 2014; as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Covanta Energy Corporation, which owns and operates energy from waste power facilities, biomass power facilities and independent power plants in the United States, Europe and Asia, from 2006 to 2010; and held various positions with Waste Services, Inc., an integrated solid waste services company that operates in the United States and Canada from 2004 to 2006, including Executive Vice President, from 2004 to 2006, and Chief Financial Officer, from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Pytosh has served as a director of the University of Illinois Foundation since 2007 and the Fertilizer Institute since 2015. Mr. Pytosh received a Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. His extensive experience with public entities in the energy industry, leadership skills and strong financial background make him well qualified to serve as our director.
December 31, 2020 | 73


Donna R. Ecton
Director
Age 73

Current Public Company Directorships:
CVR Partners (2008 to Current)
Ms. Ecton has served as our director since 2008. Ms. Ecton is chairman and chief executive officer of EEI Inc which she founded in 1998. EEI is a management consulting practice which provides private equity and sub debt firms with turnaround assistance, due diligence through market/operational assessments of companies being considered for acquisition, as well as mentoring and coaching for executive officers. Prior to this, she served on the board of directors of PETsMART where she was asked to take over the role of Chief Operating Officer. Other operating experience includes serving as chief executive officer of Business Mail Express, Inc., Van Houten North America and Andes Candies, Inc. Ms. Ecton has also served as a corporate officer of Nutri/System, Inc. and Campbell Soup Company, as well as running the upper Manhattan middle-market lending business and the midtown Manhattan banks for Citibank, N.A. Ms. Ecton has previously served as a member of the following boards of directors: Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank N.A., Mellon PSFS, H&R Block, Inc., Tandy Corporation, Barnes Group Inc., Vencor, Inc., Body Central Corp., and KAR Auction Services, Inc. Ms. Ecton has also served as a board member or chairman of numerous privately held companies and non-profit organizations. Ms. Ecton earned her MBA from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, and received her BA in economics from Wellesley College, graduating as a Durant Scholar. Ms. Ecton was elected and served on the Harvard Board of Overseers, and as president of the Harvard Business School Association’s Executive Council. She also served on the Business Advisory Council of the Carnegie Mellon Graduate School of Industrial Administration. Ms. Ecton is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. We believe Ms. Ecton's significant background as both an executive officer and director of public companies and extensive experience in finance is an asset to our Board. Her knowledge and experience, as well as risk oversight expertise, provide the audit committee with valuable perspective in managing the relationship with our independent accountants and in the performance of financial auditing oversight.

Former Public Company Directorships: Body Central Corp (2011 to 2014); KAR Auction Services, Inc. (2013 to 2019); Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank N.A., Mellon PSFS; H&R Block, Inc.; Tandy Corporation; Barnes Group Inc.; Vencor, Inc.; and PetSmart, Inc.
Jonathan Frates
Director
Age 38

Current Public Company Directorships:
CVR Partners (2016 to Current)
CVR Energy (2016 to Current)
Viskase Companies, Inc. (2016 to Current)
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (2018 to Current)
Herc Holdings Inc. (2019 to Current)
Vivus Inc. (2020 to Current)
Mr. Frates has served as our director since 2016. Mr. Frates has been a Managing Director at IEP, a diversified holding company engaged in a variety of businesses, including investment, automotive, energy, food packaging, metals, real estate and home fashion, since June 2018. From November 2015 to June 2018, Mr. Frates served as a Portfolio Company Associate at Icahn Enterprises. Prior to joining Icahn Enterprises, Mr. Frates served as a Senior Business Analyst at First Acceptance Corp. and as an Associate at its holding company, Diamond A Ford Corp. Mr. Frates began his career as an Investment Banking Analyst at Wachovia Securities LLC. Mr. Frates has served as: a director of Vivus, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, since December 2020; a director of Herc Holdings Inc., an international provider of equipment rental and services, since August 2019; Chairman of the Board of Directors of SandRidge Energy, Inc., an oil and natural gas company with a principal focus on exploration and production activities, since June 2018; a director of Viskase Companies, Inc., a meat casing company, since March 2016, and Chairman of its Board of Directors since October 2019; and a director of CVR Energy since March 2016. Mr. Frates has also been a member of the Executive Committee of ACF Industries LLC, a railcar manufacturing company, since September 2018. Mr. Frates was previously: a director of Ferrous Resources Limited, an iron ore mining company with operations in Brazil, from December 2016 to July 2019; a director of American Railcar Industries, Inc., a railcar manufacturing company, from March 2016 to December 2018; and a director of the general partner of CVR Refining, LP from March 2016 to February 2019. Ferrous Resources, American Railcar Industries, ACF Industries, Viskase Companies, CVR Energy, and CVR Refining are each indirectly controlled by Carl C. Icahn. Mr. Icahn also has a non-controlling interest in Herc Holdings and SandRidge Energy through the ownership of securities. Mr. Frates received a BBA from Southern Methodist University and an MBA from Columbia Business School. Mr. Frates' significant board experience and broad financial background make him qualified to serve as our director.

Former Public Company Directorships: Ferrous Resources Limited (2016 to 2019); American Railcar Industries, Inc. (2016 to 2018); and CVR Refining (2016 to 2019)
December 31, 2020 | 74


Hunter C. Gary
Director
Age 46

Current Public Company Directorships:
CVR Partners (2018 to Current)
CVR Energy (2018 to Current)
The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack (2016 to Current)
Vivus Inc. (2020 to Current)
Conduent Inc. (2020 to Current)
Mr. Gary has served as our director since 2018. Mr. Gary has served as Senior Managing Director IEP and has been employed by IEP since November 2010. At IEP, Mr. Gary is responsible for monitoring portfolio company operations, implementing operational value enhancement and leading operational activities in areas including, technology, merger integration, supply chain, organization transformation, real estate, recruiting, business process outsourcing, SG&A cost reduction, strategic IT projects, and executive compensation. At IEP, Mr. Gary has served in various roles, including President of IEP’s Real Estate segment since November 2013 and head of IEP’s Information Technology and Cybersecurity group since September 2015. Mr. Gary has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cadus Corporation, a company engaged in the acquisition of real estate for renovation or construction and resale, from March 2014 to June 2018. Prior to both IEP and Cadus, Mr. Gary had been employed by Icahn Associates Corporation (IA) an affiliate of IEP, in various roles since June 2003, most recently as the Chief Operating Officer of Icahn Sourcing LLC, a group purchasing organization focused on leveraging the aggregated spend of its collective members. Mr. Gary also served in a public governmental capacity from 2004 to 2008 as an elected City Council Member and Vice Mayor of Indian Creek Village in Florida. From 1997 to 2002, Mr. Gary worked, most recently as a Managing Director, at Kaufhof Warenhaus AG, a former subsidiary of the Metro Group, which was acquired by Hudson’s Bay Company. Mr. Gary has been a director of: Vivus since December 2020; Conduent Inc. since 2020; CVR Energy, since September 2018; Icahn Automotive Group LLC (IAG); The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack (PBYS), an automotive parts installer and retailer, since February 2016; PSC Metals Inc. (PSC), a metal recycling company, since May 2012; and WestPoint Home LLC (WPH), a home textiles manufacturer, since June 2007. Mr. Gary has also been a member of the Executive Committee of ACF Industries LLC since July 2015. Mr. Gary was previously a director of: Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF), a nutrition company, from April 2014 to January 2021; Ferrous Resources Limited, an iron ore mining company, from June 2015 to August 2019; the general partner of CVR Refining L.P. from September 2018 to February 2019; Tropicana Entertainment Inc.(TEI), a company that is primarily engaged in the business of owning and operating casinos and resorts, from March 2010 to October 2018; Cadus from February 2014 to June 2018; XO Holdings, a provider of telecom services, from September 2011 to January 2018; IEH Auto Parts LLC (IEHAP), a distributor of automotive aftermarket parts, from June 2015 to May 2017; Federal-Mogul Holdings Corporation (FDML), a supplier of automotive powertrain and safety components, from October 2012 to February 2016; Voltari Corporation (VLTC), a company in the business of acquiring, financing and leasing commercial real properties, from October 2007 to September 2015; American Railcar Industries, Inc. (ARI), a railcar manufacturing company, from January 2008 to June 2015; and Viskase Companies from August 2012 to June 2015. Each of ACF, ARI, Cadus, CVR Energy, CVR Refining, LP, IAG, Ferrous Resources, FDML, IEHAP, IA, IEP, PBYS, PSC, TEI, Viskase Companies, Vivus, VLTC, WPH, and XO are, or previously were, controlled indirectly controlled by Carl C. Icahn. Mr. Icahn also has or had a non-controlling interest in HLF and Conduent through the ownership of securities. Mr. Gary received his Bachelor of Science degree with senior honors from Georgetown University as well as a certificate of executive development from Columbia Graduate School of Business. Mr. Gary’s extensive experience in operations and oversight matters for a variety of company and service on other public company boards, enable him to advise our Board on a range of matters and qualified to serve as our director.

Former Public Company Directorships: Herbalife Ltd. (2014 to 2021); Ferrous Resources Limited (2015 to 2019); CVR Refining (2018 to 2019); Federal-Mogul Holdings LLC (formerly known as Federal-Mogul Holdings Corporation) (2012 to 2016); Voltari Corporation (2007 to 2015); American Railcar Industries, Inc. (2008 to 2015); Viskase Companies Inc. (2012 to 2015); Tropicana Entertainment Inc. (2010 to 2018); Cadus Inc. (2014 to 2018); and XO Holdings (2011 to 2018)
December 31, 2020 | 75


Andrew Langham
Director
Age 47

Current Public Company Directorships:
CVR Partners (2015 to Current)
Welbilt, Inc. (2016 to Current)
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (2017 to Current)
Herc Holdings, Inc. (2020 to Current)
Occidental Petroleum Corporation (2020 to Current)
Mr. Langham has served as our director since 2015. Mr. Langham has been General Counsel of IEP since 2014. From 2005 to 2014, Mr. Langham was Assistant General Counsel of Icahn Enterprises. Prior to joining Icahn Enterprises, Mr. Langham was an associate at Latham & Watkins LLP focusing on corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, and general corporate matters. Mr. Langham has been a director of: Herc Holdings, Inc. since April 2020; Occidental Petroleum Corporation, an oil and gas exploration and production company, since March 2020; Cheniere Energy, Inc., a developer of natural gas liquefaction and export facilities and related pipelines, since 2017; and Welbilt, Inc., a commercial foodservice equipment manufacturer, since 2016. Mr. Langham was previously a director of: CVR Energy, from 2014 to 2017; the general partner of CVR Refining, LP from 2014 to 2019; Freeport-McMoRan Inc., a leading international mining company, from 2015 to 2018; and Newell Brands Inc., a global marketer of consumer and commercial products, in 2018. CVR Energy and CVR Refining, LP are each indirectly controlled by Carl C. Icahn. Mr. Icahn also has non-controlling interests in Herc Holdings, Occidental, Cheniere, Welbilt, Freeport-McMoRan and Newell Brands through the ownership of securities. Mr. Langham received a B.A. from Whitman College, and a J.D. from the University of Washington. We believe that Mr. Langham’s extensive legal experience with mergers and acquisitions, as well as his board experience qualify him as a director.

Former Public Company Directorships: CVR Refining (2014 to 2019); Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (2015 to 2018); Newell Brands Inc. (2018); CVR Energy (2014 to 2017)
Frank M. Muller, Jr.
Director
Age 78

Current Public Company Directorships:
CVR Partners (2008 to Current)
Mr. Muller has served as our director since 2008. Mr. Muller is currently the President of Toby Enterprises, which he founded in 1999 to invest in startup companies, and the Chairman of Topaz Technologies, LTD., a software engineering company. Until August 2009, Mr. Muller served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the technology design and manufacturing from TenX Technology, Inc., which he founded in 1985. Mr. Muller was a Senior Vice President of the Coastal Corporation from 1989 to 2001, focusing on business acquisitions and joint ventures, and General Manager of the Kensington Company, Ltd. From 1984 to 1989. Mr. Muller started his business career in the oil and chemical industries with PepsiCo, Inc. and Agrico Chemical Company. Mr. Muller served in the United States Army from 1965 to 1973. Mr. Muller received a BS and MBA from Texas A&M University. Mr. Muller's experience in the chemical industry and expertise in developing and growing new businesses make him qualified to serve as our director.
December 31, 2020 | 76


Peter K. Shea
Director
Age 69

Current Public Company Directorships:
CVR Partners (2014 to Current)
Viskase Companies, Inc. (2006 to Current)
Mr. Shea has been our director since 2014. Mr. Shea has served as an operating partner of Snow Phipps, a private equity firm, since 2013. Mr. Shea served as an operating advisor for OMERS Private Equity from 2011 to 2016. He has been a director of Decopac, Inc. since 2017 and currently serves as Chairman of its Board of Directors. He has served as a director of Viskase Companies since October 2006; FeraDyne Outdoors, LLC, a privately-held manufacturer of sporting goods products, and as its Chairman from May 2014 to February 2019; Teasdale Foods Inc., a privately-held provider of Hispanic food products, and as its Chairman from November 2014 to February 2019; and currently Chairman of DecoPac Inc., a privately-held supplier of bakery goods, since September 2017. Mr. Shea previously served as a director of Trump Entertainment Resorts from January 2017 to June 2017; Voltari Corporation from September 2015 to July 2019, and as its Chairman from September 2015 to July 2019; Give and Go Prepared Foods, a bakery manufacturer from January 2012 to July 2016; Sitel Worldwide Corporation, a customer care solutions provider, from November 2011 to April 2015; Hennessy Capital Acquisition Company I from January 2014 to February 2015, Hennessy Capital Acquisition Company II from July 2016 to February 2017, Hennessy Capital Acquisition Company III from July 2017 to October 2018, and Hennessy Capital Acquisition Company IV from February 2019 to December 2020, all four of which were special purpose acquisition companies; and CTI Foods, from May 2010 to July 2013. Mr. Shea was President of Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc. and Head of Icahn Associates Portfolio Operations from October 2006 to June 2009. He was previously on the Boards of Roncadin Gmbh, Premium Standard Farms, Sabert Company, and New Energy Company of Indiana. Mr. Shea was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President or Managing Director of H.J. Heinz in Europe, R&R Foods in Europe, John Morrell & Company and Grupo Polymer United SA. Previously, he was Head of Global Corporate Development for United Brands Company, a Fortune 50 Company. Mr. Shea began his career with General Foods Corporation. He has an M.B.A. from the University of Southern California and a B.B.A. from Iona College. We believe Mr. Shea's broad executive, financial and operational experience, combined with his extensive board experience will be an asset to our board and qualify him to serve as our director.

Former Public Company Directorships: Hennessy Capital lV (2019 to 2020); Voltari Corporation (2015 to 2019); Sitel Worldwide Corporation (2011 to 2015); Trump Entertainment Resorts (2016 to 2017); Hennessy Capital I (2014 to 2015); Hennessy Capital II (2016 to 2017); Hennessy Capital III (2017 to 2018); American Railcar Industries, Inc. (2006 to 2009); and XO Holdings (2006 to 2009)

Director Independence & Controlled Company Exemptions

To be considered independent under NYSE listing standards, our Board must determine that a director has no material relationship with us other than as a director. The standards specify the criteria by which the independence of directors will be determined, including guidelines for directors and their immediate family members with respect to employment or affiliation with us or with our independent public accountants. The Board has affirmatively determined that each of Ms. Ecton and Messrs. Muller and Shea meet the independence standards established by the NYSE and the Exchange Act for membership on an audit committee and are non-employee directors, as defined by the rules and regulations of the NYSE, the SEC, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

As a publicly traded partnership, we qualify for, and rely on, certain exemptions from the NYSE’s corporate governance requirements, including the following:

A majority of our directors are not required to be (and are not) independent;
Our Board has not and does not currently intend to establish a nominating/corporate governance committee; and
The Compensation Committee of our Board does not need to be (and is not) composed entirely of independent directors.

As a result, unitholders do not have the same protections afforded to equity holders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.


December 31, 2020 | 77


Board Committees

Our Board has five standing committees appointed by the Board: the Audit Committee; the Compensation Committee; the Environmental Health & Safety (“EH&S”) Committee; the Conflicts Committee; and the Special Committee. Any standing committee with a written charter reviews the adequacy of such charter, at least annually, in addition to evaluating its performance and reporting to the Board on such evaluation. These charters are available free of charge on our website at www.CVRPartners.com or in print without charge to any unitholder requesting them by sending a written request to our Secretary at the address listed under “Communications with Directors” below.

Audit Committee
Members:Primary Responsibilities:
Donna R. Ecton, Chair (1)(3)
Frank M. Muller, Jr. (2)(3)
Peter K. Shea (2)(3)
Ø Appoints, compensates, oversees and evaluates the performance of the independent auditors, including approval of all services to be performed by and the independence of the independent auditor.

Ø Reviews with management, our internal auditors and independent auditors the adequacy, quality and integrity of the Partnership’s internal controls, the fair presentation and accuracy of the Partnership’s financial statements and disclosures, audit reports and management’s responses thereto, and the Partnership’s critical accounting policies and practices.

Ø Oversees and evaluates the performance, responsibilities, budget and staffing of the internal audit function including its senior audit executive.

Ø Establishes procedures for and oversees handling of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential submission of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

Ø Monitors and periodically reviews the Partnership’s compliance with applicable laws, major litigation, regulatory compliance, risk management, insurance coverage and any policies, practices or mitigation activities relating thereto.

Ø Reviews and discusses with management potential significant risks to the Partnership and risk mitigation efforts including relating to information technology and cybersecurity controls.

Ø Assists the Board in its oversight of the governance portions of the Partnership’s ESG initiatives including the Partnership’s governance practices and reputation, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, anti-bribery and anti-corruption programs and of the overall risks relating to such ESG initiatives.

Ø Reviews and discusses with management and Grant Thornton LLP, our independent registered accounting firm, the audited financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Ø Received written disclosures and the letter from Grant Thornton LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

Ø Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for filing with the SEC.
Meetings in 2020: 4
(1)Audit Committee Financial Expert
(2)Financially Literate
(3)Independent, Non-Employee Director


December 31, 2020 | 78


Compensation Committee
Members:
Ø Reviews, amends, modifies, adopts and oversees the incentive compensation plans, equity-based compensation plans, qualified retirement plans, health and welfare plans, deferred compensation plans, and any other benefit plans, programs or arrangements sponsored or maintained by the Partnership or its general partner.

Ø Evaluates the performance of our executive officers and, in connection therewith, reviews and determines, or recommends to the Board, the annual salary, bonus, equity-based compensation, and other compensation, incentives and benefits of our executive officers (other than compensation and benefits provided by one of its affiliates).

Ø Reviews and approves any employment, consulting, change in control, severance or termination, or other compensation agreements or arrangements with our executive officers.

Ø Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of non-employee directors or any plans or programs relating thereto.

Ø Reviews and discusses the Compensation Committee Report and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and recommends to the Board their inclusion in the Partnership’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K.

Ø Assists the Board in assessing any risks to the Partnership associated with compensation practices and policies.

Ø Assists the Board in its oversight of the social portions of the Partnership’s ESG initiatives including diversity, inclusion and human rights strategies, commitments, and reporting.
Frank M. Muller, Jr., Chair
Andrew Langham
Meetings in 2020:2
Acted by Written Consent in 2020: 3
Ø Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee Report, and other disclosures relating to the Compensation Committee be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

EH&S Committee
Members:
Ø Oversees the establishment and administration of environmental, health and safety policies, programs, procedures, and initiatives.

Ø Assists the Board in its oversight of risk relating to environmental, health, safety, and security matters.

Ø Assists the Board in its oversight of the environmental, health, safety, and security portions of the Partnership’s ESG initiatives including the Partnership’s environmental, health, safety and security risks, opportunities, policies and reporting, including those related to climate change and sustainability.
Peter K. Shea, Chair
Donna R. Ecton
Frank M. Muller, Jr.
Mark A. Pytosh


Meetings in 2020: 1


December 31, 2020 | 79


Conflicts Committee
Members:
Ø As requested by the Board, investigates, reviews, evaluates and acts upon any potential conflicts of interest between our general partner or its affiliates, on the one hand, and us or any public unitholder, on the other, the approvals of which (if any) are conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to the Partnership and its common unitholders.

Ø As requested by the Board, determines whether the resolution of a conflict of interest is in the best interests of the Partnership.

Ø Carries out any other duties delegated by the Board that relate to potential conflicts of interest.

Ø Has the sole authority to retain, compensate, direct, oversee, and terminate any counsel or other advisers, including consultants, attorneys, independent accountants and other service providers, to assist in the evaluation of conflicts matters and to approve such consultants’ fees and other retention terms.

Ø Approvals are conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to the Partnership, approved by all of the Partnership’s partners and not a breach by the General Partner of any duties it may owe us or our unitholders.
Donna R. Ecton, Chair (1)
Frank M. Muller, Jr. (1)


Meetings in 2020: 1
(1) Independent, Non-Employee Director

Special Committee
Members:
Ø Evaluates and approves matters arising during the intervals between meetings of the Board that did not warrant convening a special meeting of the Board but should not be postponed until the next scheduled meeting of that Board.

Ø Exercises approval authority delegated to it by the Board.

Jonathan Frates
David L. Lamp
Andrew Langham

Acted by Written Consent in 2020: 5


Meetings of Independent or Non-Management Directors and Executive Sessions

To promote open discussion among independent and non-management directors, we schedule regular executive sessions in which our independent or non-management directors meet without management participation. At the end of 2017,During 2020, three of our eight directors were independent, and six of our eight directors were non-management. Our independent directors met during foureight executive sessions in 2017.2020. Ms. Donna R. Ecton (independent) presided over the executive sessionsessions held by our independent directors. Our non-management directors did not meet in executive session in 2017. The non-management directors determine who will preside over their executive sessions.

Communications with Directors

Unitholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate with our boardBoard may send a written communication addressed to:
CVR Partners, LP
2277 Plaza Drive, Suite 500
Sugar Land, Texas 77479
Attention: Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Our General Counsel will forward all appropriate communications directly to our boardBoard or to any individual director or directors, depending upon the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. Any unitholder or other interested party who is interested in contacting only the independent directors or non-management directors as a group or the director who presides over the meetings of the independent directors or non-management directors may also send written communications to the contact above and should state for whom the communication is intended.

December 31, 2020 | 80


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The board of directors of our general partner has created a compensation committee.
During 2017,2020, the compensation committeeCompensation Committee was comprised of Frank M.Messrs. Muller Jr. (chairman) and Andrew Langham. None of the members of the compensation committee of our general partnerCompensation Committee during 20172020 has, at any time, been an officer or employee of the Partnership or our general partner and none has any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. No interlocking relationship exists between the board of directorsBoard or compensation committee of our general partnerCompensation Committee and the board of directors or compensation committee of any other company.


Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Ethics

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees (and which includes additional provisions that apply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and other persons performing similar functions) are available free of charge on our website at www.CVRPartners.com. These documents are also available in print without charge to any unitholder requesting them. We intend to disclose any changes in or waivers from our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on our website or by filing a Form 8-K with the SEC.

Executive Officers

While the Board provides high-level strategy and Directors
guidance for the Partnership, our day-to-day activities are carried out by our executive officers. Our executive officers are appointed by the Board and act within the authorities granted by the Board and our organizational documents. Limited partners are not entitled to appoint our executive officers or directly or indirectly participate in our management or operations. In this report, we refer to the executive officers of our general partner as “our executive officers.” The following table sets forth the names, positions, ages, background, experience and agesqualifications (as of February 15, 2018)22, 2021) of the executive officers and directors of our general partner.
The executive officers named below (other than Mr. Pytosh and Mr. White) are also executive officers of CVR Energy and are providing their services to our general partner and us pursuant to the services agreement entered into among us, CVR Energy and our general partner. The shared executive officers divide their working time between the management of CVR Energy, CVR Refining and us. The approximate weighted-average percentages of the amount of time the shared executive officers spent on management of our partnership in 2017 are as follows: David L. Lamp (15%), Susan M. Ball (30%), John R. Walter (39%) and Janice T. DeVelasco (20%).
John J. Lipinski retired as Executive Chairman and a director of our general partner, on December 31, 2017. David L.other than Messrs. Lamp succeeds Mr. Lipinski. He was appointed as co-Executive Chairman of our general partner on December 1, 2017 and joined the board of directors of our general partner effective January 1, 2018. Janice T. DeVelasco was appointed as an executive officer of our general partner effective January 1, 2018.Pytosh, who are listed under “The Board” above.
Mr. Pytosh also provides services to CVR Energy pursuant to the GP services agreement entered into among us, our general partner and CVR Energy. During 2017, Mr. Pytosh spent approximately 70% of his time on management of our partnership, while the remaining approximately 30% was spent on matters for CVR Energy and CVR Refining. Mr. White spends 100% of his time on management of CVR Partners.

NameAgePosition With Our General PartnerPrincipal Occupation, Experience and Qualifications
David L. Lamp
Tracy D. Jackson
Age: 51

Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (since 2018)
60
Ms. Jackson has served as our Executive Chairman and Director
Mark A. Pytosh53
Vice President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer since May 2018. Prior to joining CVR Energy, Ms. Jackson held various positions at Tesoro Corporation and Tesoro Logistics LP including Vice President and Controller from March 2015 to October 2016, Vice President of Financial Planning and Analytics from September 2013 to March 2015, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer from October 2010 to September 2013, and Vice President of Internal Audit from May 2007 to September 2010. Ms. Jackson obtained her undergraduate Bachelor of Business Administration and Accounting in 1993 and a Master of Business Administration in May 2012 from the University of Texas at San Antonio. Ms. Jackson is a Certified Public Accountant, a Certified Internal Auditor and Certified Information Systems Auditor.
Susan
Melissa M. Ball
54
Buhrig
Age: 45

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
General Counsel and Treasurer
John R. WalterSecretary
(since 2018)
41
Ms. Buhrig has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
William White62
since July 2018. Prior to joining CVR Energy, Ms. Buhrig served as Executive Vice President, - MarketingGeneral Counsel and Operations
Janice T. DeVelasco59
Secretary of Delek US Holdings, Inc. and the general partner of Delek Logistics Partners, LP from October 2017 to June 2018 and held various positions with Western Refining, Inc. (“WNR”) from November 2005 until June 2017 including Senior Vice President - Environmental, Health, Safety & Security
Donna R. Ecton70
Director
Jonathan Frates35
Director
Andrew Langham44
Director
Frank M. Muller, Jr.75
Director
Louis J. Pastor33
Director
Peter K. Shea66
DirectorServices and Compliance Officer from August 2016 until WNR’s acquisition by Andeavor in July 2017, and Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Compliance Officer of the general partner of Northern Tier Energy, LP (a WNR affiliate) from March 2014 until August 2016. Ms. Buhrig received a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from the University of Michigan and a Juris Doctor with honors from the University of Miami School of Law.
David L. Lamp serves as President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director
December 31, 2020 | 81


Table of CVR Energy, as well as President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the general partner of CVR Refining and Executive Chairman and a Director of the general partner of CVR Partners. Mr. Lamp joined the company in December 2017, and joined our boards in January 2018. Mr. Lamp previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer for Western Refining Inc. from July 2016 to June 2017. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer and President and a director of Northern Tier Energy Corporation from March 2014 until July 2016. Prior to Northern Tier, Mr. Lamp was with HollyFrontier Corporation and served as Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President. In 2011, Holly and Frontier completed a merger of equals and changed their name to HollyFrontier Corporation. Mr. Lamp joined Holly in January 2004 as Vice President, Refinery Operations and was responsible for all aspects of its refining operations. In November 2005, he was named Executive Vice President, Refining and Marketing, adding the additional responsibilities of its crude, light products marketing and asphalt businesses. Mr. Lamp was named President of Holly in November 2007. Mr. Lamp has more than 37 years of technical, commercial and operational experience in the refining and chemical industries. Prior to joining Holly, Mr. Lamp was the Vice President and General Manager of El Paso Energy’s Aruba refining complex. Earlier in his career he served as Director of Operations for KOSA, a polyester production joint venture between Koch Industries and Saba, where he oversaw KOSA’s 15 chemical and fiber plants in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and Europe. Prior to joining KOSA, Mr. Lamp had a long and distinguished career with Koch Industries, spanning more than 20 years. Mr. Lamp rose through various positions of increasing authority, ultimately becoming Executive Vice President-Refining and Chemical Operations where he had responsibility for all operating aspects of Koch’s 500,000 barrels-per-day of crude refining capacity and all of Koch’s chemical plants. Mr. Lamp obtained a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from Michigan State University. Mr. Lamp’s extensive knowledge and experience in the refining and chemical industries, as well as his significant background serving in key leadership roles at public and private companies make him well qualified to serve as a director of our general partner.Contents

Matthew W. Bley
Age: 39

Chief Accounting Officer and
Corporate Controller (since 2018)
Mr. Bley has served as our Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller since May 2018. Prior to joining CVR Energy, Mr. Bley held the roles of Assistant Controller of reporting from March 2015 to April 2018, Senior Manager of Financial Reporting from September 2013 to March 2015 and Manager of Accounting Research from May 2012 to September 2013 for Andeavor (formerly Tesoro). Mr. Bley received a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration and a Master of Science in Accounting from Trinity University in 2004 and 2005, respectively. In addition, he received a Master of Business Administration from Baylor University and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Mark A. Pytosh serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of CVR Partners, as well as Executive Vice President - Corporate Services of CVR Energy and the general partner of CVR Refining, in each case, as of January 2018. He has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of CVR Partners since May 2014, and has served as a director of the general partner of CVR Partners since June 2011. Mr. Pytosh previously served as Senior Vice President - Administration for CVR Energy and CVR Refining from December 2014 to December 2017. Prior to joining CVR Partners, Mr. Pytosh served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Alberta, Canada-based Tervita Corporation, an environmental and energy services company. From 2006 to 2010, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Covanta Energy Corporation, which owns and operates energy-from-waste power facilities, biomass power facilities and independent power plants in the United States, Europe and Asia. Prior to Covanta, Mr. Pytosh served as Executive Vice President from 2004 to 2006, and Chief Financial Officer from 2005 to 2006, for Waste Services, Inc., an integrated solid waste services company that operates in the United States and Canada. Prior to joining the renewable energy and waste industries, Mr. Pytosh spent 18 years in the investment banking industry, working with a broad range of clients in the environmental services, automotive, construction equipment and a variety of other industrial sectors. From 2000 to 2004, he was a Managing Director in investment banking at Lehman Brothers, where he led the firm’s global industrial group. Prior to joining Lehman Brothers, he was a Managing Director at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, where he led the firm’s environmental services and automotive industry groups. Mr. Pytosh received a Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. He serves on the boards of directors for The Fertilizer Institute and the University of Illinois Foundation. We believe Mr. Pytosh's experience with public companies in the energy industry and strong financial background is an asset to our board.
Susan M. Ball serves as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of CVR Energy, the general partner of CVR Refining, and the general partner of CVR Partners, in each case, as of January 2018. She previously served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of CVR Energy and CVR Partners’ general partner from August 2012 to December 2017. She also previously served as Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Treasurer of CVR Energy and the general partner of CVR Partners since October 2007 and as Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Treasurer for CRLLC since May 2006. In addition, Ms. Ball also served as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of CVR Refining’s general partner from its inception in September 2012 to December 2017. Ms. Ball has more than 30 years of experience in the accounting industry, with more than 12 years serving clients in the public accounting industry. Prior to joining CVR Energy, she served as a Tax Managing Director with KPMG LLP, where she was responsible for all aspects of federal and state income tax compliance and tax consulting, which included a significant amount of mergers and acquisition work on behalf of her clients. Ms. Ball received a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from Missouri Western State University and is a Certified Public Accountant.
John R. Walter serves as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of CVR Energy, the general partner of CVR Refining, and the general partner of CVR Partners, in each case, as of January 2018. He previously served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of CVR Energy and each of the general partners of CVR Refining and CVR Partners from January 2015 to December 2017. He has served as Vice President, Associate General Counsel since January 2011, Assistant Secretary since May 2011 and Associate General Counsel since March 2008. Prior to joining CVR Energy, Mr. Walter was an associate at Stinson Leonard Street LLP in Kansas City, Missouri, from 2006 to 2008, and was an associate at Seigfreid Bingham, P.C. in Kansas City, Missouri, from 2002 to 2006. Mr. Walter received a Bachelor of Science in psychology from Colorado State University and a Juris Doctor from the University of Kansas.

William White has served as Executive Vice President of Marketing and Operations of our general partner since June 2014. Mr. White has over 40 years of experience in the chemical industry. He first joined Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of CVR Partners, in 2005 as the director of business development and logistics. He later served as our general partner's vice president of marketing. In 2012, he was promoted to vice president of marketing, development and logistics. Mr. White spent the majority of his career serving in various management positions related to predecessor companies of CVR Partners, such as manager of Farmland Industries, Inc.'s ("Farmland") product distribution system and plant manager at Farmland’s Pollock, La., and Enid, Okla., fertilizer plants. Prior to joining Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers, he served as the general manager for EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc. Mr. White holds a bachelor’s degree in business from the University of Louisiana at Monroe. He previously served on the board of directors for The Fertilizer Institute.
Donna R. Ecton has been a member of the board of directors of our general partner since March 2008. Ms. Ecton is chairman and chief executive officer of EEI Inc. which she founded in 1998.  EEI is a management consulting practice which provides private equity and sub debt firms with turnaround assistance, due diligence through market/operational assessments of companies being considered for acquisition, as well as mentoring and coaching for chief executive officers.  Prior to this, she served on the board of directors of PETsMART where she was asked to take over the role of chief operating officer.  Other operating experience includes serving as chief executive officer of Business Mail Express, Inc., Van Houten North America and Andes Candies, Inc.   Ms. Ecton has also served as a corporate officer of Nutri/System, Inc. and Campbell Soup Company, as

well as running the upper Manhattan middle market lending business and the midtown Manhattan banks for Citibank, N.A.  Ms. Ecton currently is a member of the board of directors of KAR Auction Services, Inc., a leading provider of vehicle auction services in North America.  Previous public company board positions have included Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank N.A., Mellon PSFS, H&R Block, Inc., Tandy Corporation, Barnes Group Inc., Vencor, Inc., and Body Central Corp.  Ms. Ecton has also served as a board member or chairman of numerous privately held companies and non-profit organizations. Ms. Ecton earned her MBA from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, and received her BA in economics from Wellesley College, graduating as a Durant Scholar.  Ms. Ecton was elected and served on the Harvard Board of Overseers, and as president of the Harvard Business School Association’s Executive Council.  She also served on the Business Advisory Council of the Carnegie Mellon Graduate School of Industrial Administration.  Ms. Ecton is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.  We believe Ms. Ecton's significant background as both an executive officer and director of public companies and experience in finance is an asset to our board. Her knowledge and experience provide the audit committee with valuable perspective in managing the relationship with our independent accountants and the performance of the financial auditing oversight.
Jonathan Frates has been a Portfolio Company Associate at Icahn Enterprises L.P., a diversified holding company engaged in a variety of businesses, including investment, automotive, energy, gaming, railcar, food packaging, metals, mining, real estate and home fashion, since November 2015. Prior to joining Icahn Enterprises, Mr. Frates served as a Senior Business Analyst at First Acceptance Corp. and as an Associate at its holding company, Diamond A Ford Corp. Mr. Frates began his career as an Investment Banking Analyst at Wachovia Securities LLC. Mr. Frates has served as a director of: Ferrous Resources Limited, an iron ore mining company with operations in Brazil, since December 2016; CVR Partners since April 2016; American Railcar Industries, Inc., a railcar manufacturing company, since March 2016; Viskase Companies, Inc., a meat casing company, since March 2016; CVR Energy since March 2016; and CVR Refining since March 2016. Ferrous Resources, American Railcar Industries, Viskase Companies, CVR Energy, CVR Refining and CVR Partners are each indirectly controlled by Carl C. Icahn. Mr. Frates received a BBA from Southern Methodist University and an MBA from Columbia Business School. Based upon Mr. Frate’s strong financial background and experience as an analyst, we believe that Mr. Frates has the requisite set of skills to serve as a member of our board.
Andrew Langham has been General Counsel of Icahn Enterprises L.P. (a diversified holding company engaged in a variety of businesses, including investment, automotive, energy, gaming, railcar, food packaging, metals, mining, real estate and home fashion) since 2014. From 2005 to 2014, Mr. Langham was Assistant General Counsel of Icahn Enterprises. Prior to joining Icahn Enterprises, Mr. Langham was an associate at Latham & Watkins LLP focusing on corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, and general corporate matters. Mr. Langham has been a director of: Cheniere Energy, Inc., a developer of natural gas liquefaction and export facilities and related pipelines, since 2017; Welbilt, Inc. (formerly known as Manitowoc Foodservice, Inc.), a commercial foodservice equipment manufacturer, since 2016; Freeport-McMoRan Inc., the world’s largest publicly traded copper producer, since 2015; CVR Partners since 2015; and CVR Refining since 2014. Mr. Langham was previously a director of CVR Energy from 2014 to 2017. CVR Partners, CVR Refining and CVR Energy are each indirectly controlled by Carl C. Icahn. Mr. Icahn also has non-controlling interests in Cheniere, Welbilt and Freeport-McMoRan through the ownership of securities. Mr. Langham received a B.A. from Whitman College, and a J.D. from the University of Washington. Based on Mr. Langham's extensive corporate and public company experience, we believe that Mr. Langham has the requisite set of skills to serve as a member of our board.
Frank M. Muller, Jr. has been a member of the board of directors of our general partner since May 2008. Until August 2009, Mr. Muller served as the chairman and chief executive officer of the technology design and manufacturing firm TenX Technology, Inc., which he founded in 1985. He is currently the president of Toby Enterprises, which he founded in 1999 to invest in startup companies, and the chairman of Topaz Technologies, Ltd., a software engineering company. Mr. Muller was a senior vice president of The Coastal Corporation from 1989 to 2001, focusing on business acquisitions and joint ventures, and general manager of the Kensington Company, Ltd. from 1984 to 1989. Mr. Muller started his business career in the oil and chemical industries with Pepsico, Inc. and Agrico Chemical Company. Mr. Muller served in the United States Army from 1965 to 1973. Mr. Muller received a BS and MBA from Texas A&M University. We believe Mr. Muller's experience in the chemical industry and expertise in developing and growing new businesses is an asset to our board.
Louis J. Pastor has been Deputy General Counsel of Icahn Enterprises L.P. (a diversified holding company engaged in a variety of businesses, including investment, automotive, energy, gaming, railcar, food packaging, metals, mining, real estate and home fashion) since 2015. From 2013 to 2015, Mr. Pastor was Assistant General Counsel of Icahn Enterprises. Prior to joining Icahn Enterprises, Mr. Pastor was an Associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, where he advised corporate, private equity and investment banking clients on a wide array of corporate finance transactions, business combination transactions and other general corporate matters. Mr. Pastor has been a director of: CVR Energy since August 2017; Herc Holdings Inc., an international provider of equipment rental and services, since June 2016; CVR Partners since April 2016; and CVR Refining since September 2014. Mr. Pastor has also been a member of the Executive Committee of ACF Industries LLC, a railcar manufacturing company, since July 2015. Mr. Pastor was previously a director of Federal-Mogul Holdings Corporation, a

supplier of automotive powertrain and safety components, from May 2015 to January 2017. Each of CVR Energy, CVR Refining, CVR Partners, Federal-Mogul and ACF Industries is indirectly controlled by Carl C. Icahn. Mr. Icahn also has a non-controlling interest in Herc Holdings through the ownership of securities. Mr. Pastor received a B.A. from The Ohio State University and a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania. Based on Mr. Pastor's strong finance and corporate experience, we believe that Mr. Pastor has the requisite set of skills to serve as a member of our board.
Peter K. Shea has been a member of the board of directors of our general partner since May 2014. Mr. Shea has been a private equity investor since January 2010. Mr. Shea has served as an operating partner of Snow Phipps, a private equity firm, since 2013. Mr. Shea served as an operating advisor for OMERS Private Equity from 2011 to 2016. He has been a director of Viskase Companies, Inc., a supplier of cellulose and fibrous casings, since October 2006, and Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. III, a special purpose acquisition company (or SPAC), since July 2017. Mr. Shea also serves as chairman of the board of directors of Voltari Corporation, a commercial real estate company, since September 2015, FeraDyne Outdoors, LLC, a privately-held manufacturer of sporting goods products, since May 2014, Teasdale Foods Inc., a privately-held provider of Hispanic food products, since November 2014, and Chairman of DecoPac Inc., a privately-held supplier of bakery goods, since September 2017. Mr. Shea previously served as a director of Trump Entertainment Resorts from January 2017 to June 2017, Give and Go Prepared Foods, a bakery manufacturer from January 2012 to July 2016, Sitel Worldwide Corporation, a customer care solutions provider, from November 2011 to April 2015, Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. I, from January 2014 to February 2015, and Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. II, from July 2015 to December 2016, both SPACs, and CTI Foods, a processor of protein and soup products for quick serve restaurant chains from May 2010 to July 2013. Mr. Shea was President of Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc. from October 2006 to June 2009. Mr. Shea has been Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President or Managing Director of H.J. Heinz in Europe, R&R Foods in Europe, John Morrell & Company and Polymer United in Central America. Previously, he was Head of Global Corporate Development for United Brands Company. Mr. Shea began his career with General Foods Corporation. He has an M.B.A. from the University of Southern California and a B.B.A. from Iona College. We believe Mr. Shea's broad executive, financial and operational experience, combined with his extensive board experience will be an asset to our board.
The directors of our general partner hold office until the earlier of their death, resignation or removal.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceReports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors and each person who owns more than 10% of our outstanding common units, to file reports of their common unit ownership and changes in their ownership of our common units with the SEC. These same people must also furnish us with copies of these reports and representations made to us that no other reports were required. We have performed a general review of such reports and amendments thereto filed in 2017. Based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us or such representations, as appropriate, to our knowledge, all of our executive officers and directors, and other persons who owned more than 10% of our outstanding common units, fully complied with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) during 2017.2020.
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Ethics
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees (and which includes additional provisions that apply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and other persons performing similar functions) are available free of charge on our website at www.cvrpartners.com. These documents are also available in print without charge to any unitholder requesting them. We intend to disclose any changes in or waivers from our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on our website or by filing a Form 8-K with the SEC.
Item 11.    Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview
The Partnership does not directly employ anyfollowing discussion and analysis of the executives responsible for the managementcompensation arrangements (the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”) of our business.named executive officers (defined below) for 2020 should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below. This discussion contains forward looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations, and determinations regarding future compensation actions. Our general partner employs actual compensation actions may differ materially from the currently planned programs and payouts summarized in this discussion.

Named Executive Officers

The “named executive officers” in this Form 10-K are as follows:

(1)David L. Lamp, our Executive Chairman;

(2)Mark A. Pytosh, our President and Chief Executive Officer;

(3)Tracy D. Jackson, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

(4)The next two most highly compensated individuals who were serving as our chief executive officerofficers at the end of the last completed fiscal year (Melissa M. Buhrig, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and president. In addition,Secretary; and Matthew W. Bley, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller).

As of January 1, 2020, neither the Partnership nor our general partner employs William White asdirectly employed our named executive vice president, marketing and operations. The following additional executives who were responsible for the managementofficers. All of our business during 2017named executive officers are (or were) employed by CVR Energy: John J. Lipinski (our former executive chairman); David L. Lamp (our executive chairman); Susan M. Ball (our chief financial officer);Services, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Energy, and John R. Walter (our general counsel). Throughout this Annual Report, Messrs. Lipinski, Lamp and Pytosh, Ms. Ball, and Messrs. Walter and White are referred to collectively as theall of our named executive officers.officers divide their time between working for us and working for CVR Energy and its other subsidiaries.


The approximate weighted-average percentages of the amount of time that the named executive officers dedicated to the management of our business in 20172020 were as follows: John J. Lipinski (15%); David L. Lamp (15%(10%); Mark A. Pytosh (70%(60%); SusanTracy D. Jackson (18%); Melissa M. Ball (30%); John R. Walter (39%Buhrig (20%); and William White (100%Matthew W. Bley (20%). These numbers are weighted because the named executive officers may spend a different percentage of their time dedicated to our business each quarter. The remainder of their time, if any, was spent working for CVR Energy and its other subsidiaries.

Our named executive officers provide services to us under a Corporate Master Service Agreement (the “Corporate MSA”) between CVR Services and certain of its affiliates, including CVR Energy, CVR GP and the Partnership and its subsidiaries, (including effective January 1, 2020, which was approved by the Conflicts Committee of the Board. Under the Corporate MSA:
December 31, 2020 | 82


CVR Refining).Services makes available to our General Partner the services of certain CVR Energy executive officers and employees, some of whom serve as executive officers of our General Partner;
Messrs. PytoshWe, our General Partner and Whiteour operating subsidiaries, as the case may be, are employedobligated to reimburse CVR Services for any portion of the costs that CVR Services incurs in providing compensation and paid bybenefits to such CVR Energy executive officers and employees while they are providing services to us, as well as our general partner, whereas Messrs. Lipinskiallocated portion of performance-based performance plans, incentive units and Lamp, Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter are (or were) employed and paidperformance units issued by CVR Energy and its Subsidiaries to those employees providing services to us under the Corporate MSA; and
We pay CVR Services a monthly fee for goods and services supplied under the Corporate MSA, subject to netting and an annual true up, as well as pass-through of any direct costs incurred on behalf of a service recipient without markup.

Either CVR Services or our General Partner may terminate the Corporate MSA upon at least 90 days’ notice. For more information on the Corporate MSA, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence - Agreements with CVR Energy. The

Compensation Philosophy, Objectives and Processes

Our Compensation Committee approves compensation of Messrs. Pytosh and White is determined by the general partner of the Partnership. Sinceonly for Mr. Pytosh generally dedicates approximately(other than 40% of his timebase salary and annual bonus and equity-based incentives attributable to his service to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries, (including CVR Refining), 40%which are set by the Compensation Committee of his annual bonus and his equity-based incentives are determined by CVR Energy. During 2017, Mr. Pytosh dedicated approximately 30%the board of his time todirectors of CVR Energy and its subsidiaries. Therefore, 30% of his salary was allocated to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries. The(the “CVI Compensation Committee”)). Although our Compensation Committee generally engages in discussions with the CVI Compensation Committee regarding compensation of Messrs. Lipinski and Lamp, Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter was (or is) determined by CVR Energy. In addition, during 2017 all of thefor our named executive officers participated inand the welfareperformance of such named executive officers, it does not determine the compensation of those named executive officers other than Mr. Pytosh, and retirement plans of CVR Energy. The Partnership has no control over and does not establish or direct the compensation policies or practices of CVR Energy. TheAccordingly, while the compensation philosophies, objectives and processes described below are generally applicable to both the Partnership bears an allocated portion of CVR Energy's costs of providing compensation and benefits to the CVR Energy employees who serve as executive officers of our general partner pursuant to the services agreement described below.
Pursuant to the services agreement between us, our general partner and CVR Energy, among other matters:
CVR Energy makes available to our general partner the services of the CVR Energy executive officers and employees, certain of whom serve as executive officers of our general partner; and
We, our general partner and our operating subsidiaries, as the case may be, are obligated to reimburse CVR Energy for any allocated portion of the costs that CVR Energy incurs in providing compensation and benefits to such CVR Energy employees. We also pay our allocated portion of performance units and incentive units issued by CVR Energy to those employees providing services to the Partnership via the services agreement.
Under the services agreement, either our general partner, our subsidiaries or we pay CVR Energy: (i) all costs incurred by CVR Energy or its affiliates in connection with the employment of its employees who provide us services under the agreement on a full-time basis, but excluding certain share-based compensation; (ii) a prorated share of costs incurred by CVR Energy or its affiliates in connection with the employment of its employees who provide us services under the agreement on a part-time basis, but excluding certain share-based compensation, with such prorated share determined by CVR Energy on a commercially reasonable basis, based on the percent of total working time that such shared employees are engaged in performing services for us; (iii) a prorated share of certain administrative costs, including office costs, services by outside vendors, other sales, general and administrative costs and depreciation and amortization; and (iv) various other administrative costs in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Either CVR Energy or our general partner may terminate the services agreement upon at least 180 days' notice. For more information on this services agreement, see "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence — Agreements with CVR Energy." In addition, pursuant to the GP Services Agreement entered into among the Partnership, our general partner and CVR Energy, CVR Energy must pay a prorated share of costs incurred by the Partnership or its general partner in connection with the provision of services to CVR Energy on a part-time basis by employees of the Partnership, as determined by the general partner on a commercially reasonable basis based on the percentage of total working time that such shared employees are engaged in performing services for CVR Energy. During 2017, Mr. Pytosh spent approximately 30% of his time on matters for CVR Energy. Mr. White did not provide any services to CVR Energy.
Based on an internal review by the compensation committee of our general partner of our material compensation programs and its understanding of the material compensation programs of CVR Energy, the compensation committee of our general partner has concluded that there are no plans that provide meaningful incentives for employees, including the named executive officers, to take risks that would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Partnership.
As discussed above, 2017 compensation for Messrs. Lipinski and Lamp, Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter was set by CVR Energy, while the 2017 compensation for Messrs. Pytosh and White was set by our general partner (other than 40% of the annual bonus and equity-based incentives for Mr. Pytosh, which were set by CVR Energy). The remainder of thethis Compensation Discussion and Analysis is divided into two sections; the first focuses ondiscusses CVR Partners'Partners’ compensation programs and the second focuses on CVR Energy's compensation programs.
CVR Partners' Compensation Programs
The following discussion relatesin which references to the 2017 compensation of theour named executive officers who were employees ofrefer solely to Mr. Pytosh, except where otherwise indicated.

In establishing named executive officer compensation, our general partner through December 31, 2017, Messrs. Pytosh and White. Accordingly, referencesCompensation Committee (and the CVI Compensation Committee) generally seeks to thecompensate named executive officers in this section shall refer solely to Messrs. Pytosh and White. In addition, all references to our compensation committee refer toa way that meaningfully aligns their interests with the compensation committee of the board of directorsinterests of our general partner.unitholders, including:

Incentivizing important business priorities such as safety, reliability, environmental performance and earnings growth;
Compensation Objectives
CVR Partners'Aligning the named executive compensation objectives are threefold:
To align the executive officers' interestofficers’ interests with thatthose of theour unitholders and stakeholders, which providesincluding providing long-term economic benefits to the unitholders;
To provideProviding competitive financial incentives in the form of salary, bonuses and benefits with the goal of retaining and attracting talented and highly motivated executive officers; and
To maintainMaintaining a compensation program whereby the named executive officers, through exceptional performance and equity-based incentive awards, have the opportunity to realize economic rewards commensurate with appropriate gains of other unitholders and stakeholders.
CVR Partners
The Compensation Committee takes these main objectives into consideration when creating its compensation programs, setting each element of compensation under those programs, and determining the proper mix of the various compensation elements. Named executive officer compensation will generally include a mix of fixed elements, intended to provide stability, as well as variable elements, which align pay and performance, incentivizing and rewarding our named executive officers in years where the Partnership achieves superior results.
Elements
The Compensation Committee also generally considers, among other factors, the success and performance of the Partnership, the contributions of named executive officers to such success and performance, and the current economic conditions and industry environment in which the Partnership operates. From time to time, the Compensation ProgramCommittee may utilize various tools in evaluating and establishing named executive officer compensation, including their own common sense, knowledge and experience, as well as some or all of the following:
For 2017,Input from Board members or management. The Compensation Committee may from time to time ask that certain members of the Board and/or management provide information and recommendations relating to named executive officer compensation. Such information typically includes the named executive officers’ roles and responsibilities, job
December 31, 2020 | 83


performance, the Partnership’s performance generally and among the industry, and such other information as may be requested by the Compensation Committee.
Market data and peer comparisons. The Compensation Committee may utilize market data derived from the executive pay practices and levels of industry companies supplemented with broad-based compensation survey data, survey data from the energy, refining and processing industries that influence the competitive market for executive compensation levels and/or from companies comparable to the Company in terms of size and scale.
The analysis, judgment and expertise of an independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee may engage an independent outside compensation consultant periodically to provide a comprehensive analysis and recommendations regarding named executive officer compensation.

Our Compensation Committee periodically evaluates and considers risks of our compensation policies and practices and those of CVR Energy as generally applicable to employees, including our named executive officers. Our Compensation Committee believes that neither our policies and practices nor the policies and practices of CVR Energy encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking, and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. In reaching this conclusion, our Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the design features, characteristics, and performance metrics of our compensation programs, approval mechanisms for compensation, and observed the following factors, among others, which the Compensation Committee believes reduces risks associated with our and CVR Energy’s compensation policies and practices:
Our compensation policies and practices are centrally designed and administered;
Our compensation is balanced among (i) fixed components like salary and benefits, and (ii) variable annual incentives tied to a mix of financial and operational performance, and (iii) long-term incentives;
The Compensation Committee has discretion to adjust annual or performance-based awards when appropriate based on our interests and the interests of our unitholders; and
Certain elements of our compensation contain claw-back provisions.

Compensation Process for 2020

In setting named executive officer compensation for 2020, while the Compensation Committee considered the philosophies and objectives described above, it did not engage an independent compensation consultant. Instead, the Compensation Committee considered input from management including the Executive Chairman and utilized the directors’ own common sense, knowledge and experience in assessing reasonableness of compensation and ensuring compensation levels remain competitive in the marketplace. The Compensation Committee further considered the structure it utilized for 2019 compensation, determined that no material changes to such structure was appropriate at this time, and elected to keep the structure of 2020 compensation generally consistent with the previous year.

2020 Named Executive Officer Compensation - CVR Partners

Compensation Elements. As with 2019, the three primary components of CVR Partners'Partners’ compensation program werefor 2020 included base salary, an annual performance-based cash bonus, and an annual equity-based incentive awards. While theseaward vesting ratably over three components are related, they are viewed as separate and analyzed as such.years. The named executive officers are also provided with benefits that are generally available to CVR Partners' salaried employees.
CVR Partners believes that equity-based compensation is the primary motivator in attracting and retaining executive officers. Salary and cash bonuses are viewed as secondary. However, the compensation committee views a competitive level of salary and cash bonus as critical to retaining talented individuals.
CVR Partners has not established equity ownership requirements for its executive officers. The compensation committee believes that cash-settled equity-based awards provide executive officers with a more attractive compensation package and are less burdensome for the executive officers and CVR Partners to administer than equity-settled awards. The compensation committee believes that equity-based compensation in the form of awards of CVR Partners' common units would be less attractive and more burdensome. Additionally, equity-based compensation in the form of CVR Partners' common units would dilute the ownership interest of existing common unit holders.
The compensation committeeCompensation Committee has not adopted any formal or informal policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between long-term and current compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation, or among different forms of compensation other than its belief that the most crucial component is equity-based compensation. The decision is strictly made on a subjective and individual basis after consideration of all relevant factors. The compensation committee believes that the most critical component of compensation to enhance long-term unitholder value and growth is the equity-based component and has generally targeted 40% to 60% of the compensation package to be equity-based for executive officers, other than the executive chairman and chief executive officer. This provides the incentive for executive officers to remain in the employ of CVR Partners and to promote a focused effort on growth and long-term success with long-term enhancement of unitholder value. The executive chairman and chief executive officer of CVR Partners, while not members of the compensation committee, review information provided to CVR Partners by an independent compensation consultant, Longnecker & Associates ("Longnecker"), as well as other relevant market information and actively provide guidance and recommendations to the committee regarding the amount and form of the compensation of other executives and key employees.
Longnecker was engaged by CVR Partners to generally assess the level of compensation increases year over year and to assess new and proposed rules in the compensation area. The compensation committee utilized this information, along with other market survey and general industry survey information provided by CVR Partners to review and approve executive compensation levels. Although no specific target for total compensation is set, CVR Partners generally recommends compensation levels at or near the 50th percentile of the available market survey and general industry survey information.
Base Salary.    Mr. Pytosh had an employment agreement with our general partner that set forth his initial base salary, which expired December 31, 2017 (although he continues to be employed by our general partner). Mr. White does not have an employment agreement. Base salaries are set at a level intended to enable CVR Partners to hire and retain executives and to enhance the executive'sexecutive’s motivation in a highly competitive and dynamic environment, and to reward individual and company performance. In determining base salary levels, the compensation committee takes into account the following factors: (i) CVR Partners' financial and operational performance for the year; (ii) the previous years' compensation level for each executive; (iii) market survey and general industry survey information for comparable public companies; and (iv) recommendations of the executive chairman and chief executive officer, based on individual responsibilities and performance, including each executive's commitment and ability to (A) strategically meet business challenges, (B) achieve financial results, (C) promote

legal and ethical compliance, (D) lead their own business or business team for which they are responsible and (E) diligently and effectively respond to immediate needs of the volatile industry and business environment.
Rather than establishing compensation solely on a formula-driven basis, decisions by our compensation committeeCompensation Committee are made using an approach that considers several important factors in developing compensation levels. For example,In determining base salary levels, the Compensation Committee takes into account the following factors: (i) CVR Partners’ financial and operational performance for the year; (ii) the previous years’ compensation committee considerslevel for each executive; (iii) recommendations of the Executive Chairman based on individual responsibilities and performance, (iv) the directors’ own common sense, knowledge, experience and views of the skills necessary for long-term performance; (v) whether individual base salaries reflect responsibility levels and are reasonable, competitive and fair. In addition, in setting base salaries, the compensation committee reviews publishedfair; and other market survey(vi) each named executive officer’s commitment and general industry survey informationability to strategically meet business challenges, achieve financial results, promote legal and considers the applicabilityethical compliance, lead their own business or business team for which they are responsible and diligently and effectively respond to immediate needs of the salary data in view ofvolatile industry and business environment. In February 2020, considering the individual positions within CVR Partners.
Salaries are reviewed annually byfactors set forth above, the compensation committee with periodic informal reviews throughout the year. Adjustments, if any, are usually made effective January 1 of the year immediately following the review. The compensation committee most recently reviewed the level ofCompensation Committee established 2020 base salary and cash bonus for each of the named executive officers in 2017 in conjunction with their responsibilities and expectations for 2018. They concluded their review in November 2017, and set the following base salaries for the named executive officers as of January 1, 2018: $535,000 for Mr. Pytosh of $340,549, making Mr. Pytosh’s total 2020 base salary, including time dedicated to CVR Energy, $567,582.

December 31, 2020 | 84


Annual Performance-Based Bonus. During 2020, the Compensation Committee evaluated the metrics included in CVR Partners’ annual performance-based bonus program for 2019 (the “2019 UAN Plan”) and $278,000 for Mr. White. Individual performance, market datathe Partnership’s Mission and changesValues described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis above, and further considered the Compensation Committee’s objectives of rewarding employees (including named executive officers' positions and levels of responsibility were considered. Among these three factors, slightly more weight was given to the market data.
Annual Bonus.  CVR Partners' annual bonus program is designed to meet each of its compensation objectives. Specifically, CVR Partners' annual bonus program rewards executives onlyofficers) for measured company performance, thereby aligning the executive's interestemployees’ interests with those of its unitholders, and encouraging executivesemployees to focus on targeted performance. Further, the program also provides executivesperformance, and providing employees with the opportunity to earn additional compensation thereby making our total compensation package more competitive.based on their and the Partnership’s performance. In February 2020, the Compensation Committee considered these factors and, following consultation with Mr. Lamp, established the 2020 CVR Partners, LP Performance-Based Bonus Plan (the “2020 UAN Plan”), which applies to all eligible employees of the Partnership’s subsidiaries (including Mr. Pytosh), and contains terms generally equivalent to the 2019 UAN Plan, subject to adjustment of the definition of the Adjusted EBITDA Threshold under the 2020 UAN Plan to reflect an increase in turnaround reserve from $7 million to $8 million.
Information about
The 2020 UAN Plan includes a target bonus percentage for each participant, with possible payout between 0% and 150% of target based on achievement under the measures set forth in the 2020 UAN Plan. In setting Mr. Pytosh’s target bonus percentage for 2020, the Compensation Committee considered his bonus target for 2019, the total cash compensation paid by members of CVR Partners' industry is usedto which Mr. Pytosh may be eligible in determining both2020, the level of bonus award and theexpected ratio of salary to bonus asand the compensation committee believes that maintaining a level of bonus and a ratio of fixed salary to bonus (which may fluctuate) that is in line with those of our competitors is an important factor in attracting and retaining executives. The compensation committee also believesCompensation Committee’s belief that a significant portion of an executive'sits named executive officers’ compensation should be at risk which means that a portion of the executive's overall compensation is not guaranteed and is determined based on individual and company performance. Executives have greater potentialentity performance, and elected to keep his bonus awardstarget for 2020 the same as 2019, at 135% of base salary.

Payout under the authority and responsibility2020 UAN Plan was dependent first on achievement of an executive increases. EachAdjusted EBITDA threshold of at least $83 million, and following achievement thereof, based upon the achievement of the named executive officers is eligible to receivePartnership under the performance measures specified below, followed by an annual cash bonus with aadjustment based on employees’ individual performance. These performance measures, including the threshold, target bonus equal to a specified percentage of the relevant executive's annual base salary. For 2017, the target bonusesand maximum performance goals for the named executive officers were 135% for Mr. Pytosh and 80% for Mr. White. These target percentages were the result of individual negotiations between the named executive officers and our general partner, and were in correlation with the market data and other general industry survey information provided by CVR Partners. Specific bonus measureseach such performance measure, were determined by the compensation committee, following discussions with CVR Partners' management.
In 2012, CVR Partners adopted the CVR Partners, LP Performance Incentive Plan (the "CVR Partners PIP"), pursuant to which Messrs. Pytosh and White had the opportunity to earn bonuses in respect of 2017 performance. The payment of annual bonuses for the 2017 performance year was dependent upon the achievement of financial, operational and safety measures, which comprised 35%, 45% and 20% of the annual bonus for both Messrs. Pytosh and White. Specific bonus measures were determined by the compensation committeeCompensation Committee based on its review of relevant market data and discussions with management including the Executive Chairman and the Directors’ knowledge and experience, and were selected with the goals of enforcing the Partnership’s Mission and Values, optimizing operations, maintaining financial stability and providing a safe work environmentand environmentally responsible workplace intended to maximize CVR Partners'Partners’ overall performance resulting in increased unitholder value. The compensation committee also approvedPartnership performance measures in the threshold, target2020 UAN Plan were substantially the same as the 2019 UAN Plan, and maximum performance goals with respect to each performance measure. No payment is made with respect to the measures unless the threshold of the relevant performance measure is achieved.
The 2017 financial measures were fertilizer adjusted EBITDA, which was derived from fertilizer earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and adjusted for turnaround expenses, loss on extinguishment of debt, asset impairment charges, non-controlling interest and unrealized gain / loss on derivative transactions.
The 2017 operational measure was adjusted equivalent tons of UAN production as adjusted at the discretion of our compensation committee for downtime caused by third parties.
The 2017 safety measures included the following: OSHA recordable injury statistics; OSHA lost time injury statistics;

Environmental Health & Safety (“EH&S severity statistics; air reportable releases; air reportable release quantity; tier 1 process safety events;&S”) Measures (25%)

Three measures evenly weighted (33-1/3% each), including Total Recordable Incident Rate (“TRIR”), Process Safety Tier I Incident Rate (“PSIR”), and tier 2 process safety events.

The table below reflects the: (i) financial, operational and safety measures used to determine 2017 bonuses for Messrs. Pytosh and White; (ii) threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each measure; (iii) actual resultsEnvironmental Events (“EE”), with respect to each measure; and (iv) portion of the 2017 bonusachievement determined based on each such measure. The named executive officers could have received 50% for threshold levels, 100% for target levels, and 150% for maximum levels, respectively.
the following:
2017 Performance MeasurePercentage Change (over the prior year)
2017 Performance Goals
Threshold/Target/Maximum
Bonus Achievement
Increase in Incident Rate or Incidents2017 Actual ResultsZero
0%Portion50% of Target Bonus Allocable to MeasurePercentage (Threshold)
Decrease > 0% and < 3%Linear Interpolation between Threshold and Target
Fertilizer Adjusted EBITDADecrease of 3%
Threshold: $93.0 million
Target: $104.0 million
Maximum: $127.0 million
$66.8 million35% of bonus for Messrs. Pytosh and WhiteTarget Percentage
Decrease > 3% and < 10%Linear Interpolation between Target and Maximum
UAN Adjusted Production Measure (as adjusted)Decrease of 10% or more, or if TRIR is maintained at or below 1.0, PSIR at or below 0.2 and EE at or below 20
Threshold: 1,920,000 tons
Target: 1,980,000 tons
Maximum: 2,090,000 tons
2,050,658 tons45%150% of bonus for Messrs. Pytosh and White
Coffeyville Nitrogen Environmental Health and Safety MeasuresThreshold: 5% of payout levels
Target: 10% of payout levels
Maximum: 15% of payout levels
10.5%10% of bonus for Messrs. Pytosh and White
East Dubuque Nitrogen Environmental Health and Safety MeasuresThreshold: 5% of payout levels
Target: 10% of payout levels
Maximum: 15% of payout levels
10.2%10% of bonus for Messrs. Pytosh and White
Target (Maximum)
As a result
December 31, 2020 | 85


Financial Measures (75%)

Four measures evenly weighted (25% each), including Reliability, Equipment Utilization, Operating Expenses and Return on Capital Employed (“ROCE”), with achievement determined based on the following:
ReliabilityBonus Achievement
Greater than 8.0%Zero
8%50% of Target Percentage (Threshold)
6.01% to 7.99%Linear Interpolation between Threshold and Target
6%Target Percentage
5.0% to 5.99%Linear Interpolation between Target and Maximum
Less than 5.0%150% of Target (Maximum)

Equipment UtilizationBonus Achievement
Less than 95%Zero
95%50% of Target Percentage (Threshold)
95.01% to 99.99%Linear Interpolation between Threshold and Target
100%Target Percentage
100.01% to 104.99%Linear Interpolation between Target and Maximum
Greater than 105%150% of Target (Maximum)

Operating ExpenseBonus Achievement
Greater than 103%Zero
103%50% of Target Percentage (Threshold)
100.1% to 102.99%Linear Interpolation between Threshold and Target
100%Target Percentage
95% to 99.99%Linear Interpolation between Target and Maximum
Less than 95%150% of Target (Maximum)

ROCE (Ranking vs. Peer Group)Bonus Achievement
First (highest)150% of Target (Maximum)
Second125% of Target Percentage
Third112.5% of Target Percentage
FourthTarget Percentage (100%)
Fifth75% of Target Percentage
Sixth50% of Target Percentage (Minimum)
SeventhZero

The Peer Group utilized in the 2020 UAN Plan for determination of ROCE was selected by the Compensation Committee based on discussions with the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and the Directors’ knowledge of the fertilizer industry, and was intended to include companies in the fertilizer industry with similar operations to the Partnership and those with which the Partnership competes for executive talent. The Compensation Committee elected to keep the Peer Group for 2020 the same as 2019, including CF Industries Holdings, Inc.; LSB Industries, Inc.; Nutrien Ltd.; The Andersons, Inc.; Green Plains Partners LP; and Flotek Industries Inc.

In February 2021, the Compensation Committee evaluated the performance both Messrs.of the Partnership under the 2020 UAN Plan. The Compensation Committee determined that the Partnership had achieved Adjusted EBITDA under the 2020 UAN Plan of $88 million, in excess of the Adjusted EBITDA Threshold of $83 million, and thereafter determined that the Partnership’s achievement of the metrics under the 2020 UAN Plan resulted in payout of 116% of target, based on the following:
December 31, 2020 | 86


Measure2020 ActualBonus Achievement
EH&S:TRIRIncrease of 17%%
PSIRIncrease of 267%%
EELess than 20150 %
Overall EH&S50 %
Financial:Reliability2.5%150 %
Equipment Utilization105.0%150 %
Operating Expenses95.0%150 %
ROCE7% (Fourth)100 %
Overall Financial138 %

In February 2021, the Compensation Committee approved payout to Mr. Pytosh and White earnedunder the 2020 UAN Plan of $535,700, approximately 80.13%116% of theirhis respective target annual bonuses.bonus based on his base salary for the Partnership. The CVI Compensation Committee awarded no payout to Mr. Pytosh under the 2020 performance-based bonus plan for CVR Energy (the “2020 CVI Plan”).

Equity-Based Incentive Awards
CVR Partners also usesAwards.The Compensation Committee believes equity-based incentives to rewardcompensation is one of the most crucial elements of its compensation program. The amount of equity awards is made after consideration of various relevant factors including the named executives’ overall compensation package, the compensation philosophies and objectives described above, the Partnership’s interest in rewarding long-term performance of, and in retaining, its named executive officers. The issuance of equity-based incentivesofficers and the ability to named executive officers is intended to satisfy CVR Partners' compensation program objectives by generating significantgenerate greater future value for each named executive officer if CVR Partners' performance is outstanding and the value of CVR Partners' partners' capitalPartners increases for all of its unitholders. The compensation committee believes that its equity-based incentives promote long-term retention of executives.
CVR Partners established its long-term incentive plan in March 2011 (the "CVR“CVR Partners LTIP"LTIP”) in connection with the completion of its initial public offering in April 2011. The compensation committeeCompensation Committee may elect to make grants of restricted units, options, phantom units or other equity-based awards under the CVR Partners LTIP in its discretion or may recommend grants to the board of directors of our general partner for its approval, as determined by the committee in its discretion. In 2017, Messrs. Pytosh and White received phantom unit awards pursuant to the CVR Partners LTIP. Mr. Pytosh also received an incentive unit award from CVR Energy, the terms of which are described below.
Perquisites.    The total value of all perquisites and personal benefits provided by CVR Partners to each of its named executive officers in 2017 was less than $10,000.
Other Forms of Compensation.    Mr. Pytosh previously had provisions in his employment agreement with our general partner that provide for severance benefits in the event of a termination of his employment under certain circumstances. These severance provisions are described below in " — Change-in-Control and Termination Payments" and were negotiated by Mr. Pytosh and CVR Partners.
CVR Energy's Compensation Programs
The following discussion relates to the 2017 compensation of the named executive officers who are employed by CVR Energy. In addition, this discussion addresses the bonus opportunity and equity-based incentive Mr. Pytosh participates in because a portion of his services is dedicated to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including CVR Refining). Accordingly, references to the named executive officers in this section shall refer solely to Messrs. Lipinski and Lamp, Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter (and in certain instances, where applicable, Mr. Pytosh). In addition, all references to the compensation committee refer to the compensation committee of the board of directors of CVR Energy.
Compensation Objectives
CVR Energy's executive compensation objectives are threefold:
To align the executive officers' interest with that of the stockholders and stakeholders, which provides long-term economic benefits to the stockholders;

To provide competitive financial incentives in the form of salary, bonuses and benefits with the goal of retaining and attracting talented and highly motivated executive officers; and
To maintain a compensation program whereby the executive officers, through exceptional performance and equity-based incentive, have the opportunity to realize economic rewards commensurate with appropriate gains of other equity holders and stakeholders.
CVR Energy takes these main objectives into consideration when creating its compensation programs, when setting each element of compensation under those programs, and when determining the proper mix of the various compensation elements.
Elements of Compensation Program
For 2017, the three primary components of CVR Energy's compensation program were base salary, an annual performance-based cash bonus and equity-based incentive awards. While these three components are related, they are viewed as separate and analyzed as such. The named executive officers are also provided with benefits that are generally available to CVR Energy's salaried employees.
CVR Energy believes that equity-based compensation is the primary motivator in attracting and retaining executive officers. Salary and cash bonuses are viewed as secondary. However, the compensation committee views a competitive level of salary and cash bonus as critical to retaining talented individuals.
CVR Energy has not established equity ownership requirements for its executive officers. The compensation committee believes that cash-settled equity-based awards provide executive officers with a more attractive compensation package and are less burdensome for the executive officers and CVR Energy to administer than equity-settled awards. The compensation committee believes that equity-based compensation in the form of awards of CVR Energy's common stock would be less attractive and more burdensome. Additionally, equity-based compensation in the form of CVR Energy's common stock would dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders.
The compensation committee has not adopted any formal or informal policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between long-term and current compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation, or among different forms of compensation other than its belief that the most crucial component is equity-based compensation. The decision is strictly made on a subjective and individual basis after consideration of all relevant factors. The compensation committee believes that the most critical component of compensation to enhance long-term stockholder value and growth is the equity-based component and has generally targeted 40% to 60% of the compensation package to be equity-based for executive officers, other than the chief executive officer. This provides the incentive for executive officers to remain in the employ of CVR Energy and to promote a focused effort on growth and long-term success with long-term enhancement of stockholder value. The chief executive officer of CVR Energy, while not a member of the compensation committee, reviews information provided to CVR Energy by an independent compensation consultant, Longnecker, as well as other relevant market information and actively provides guidance and recommendations to the committee regarding the amount and form of the compensation of other executives and key employees.
Longnecker was engaged by CVR Energy to generally assess the level of compensation increases year over year and to assess new and proposed rules in the compensation area. The compensation committee utilized this information, along with other market survey and general industry survey information provided by CVR Energy to review and approve executive compensation levels. Although no specific target for total compensation is set, CVR Energy generally recommends compensation levels at or near the 50th percentile of the available market survey and general industry survey information.
Base Salary.    Mr. Lipinski had an employment agreement with CVR Energy that set forth his initial base salary, which expired December 31, 2017 in connection with his retirement. Mr. Lamp has an employment agreement with CVR Energy that sets forth his initial base salary. Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter do not have employment agreements. Base salaries are set at a level intended to enable CVR Energy to hire and retain executives, to enhance the executive's motivation in a highly competitive and dynamic environment, and to reward individual and company performance. In determining base salary levels, the compensation committee takes into account the following factors: (i) CVR Energy's financial and operational performance for the year; (ii) the previous years' compensation level for each executive; (iii) market survey and general industry survey information for comparable public companies; and (iv) recommendations of the chief executive officer, based on individual responsibilities and performance, including each executive's commitment and ability to (A) strategically meet business challenges, (B) achieve financial results, (C) promote legal and ethical compliance, (D) lead their own business or business team for which they are responsible and (E) diligently and effectively respond to immediate needs of the volatile industry and business environment.
Rather than establishing compensation solely on a formula-driven basis, decisions by the compensation committee are made using an approach that considers several important factors in developing compensation levels. For example, the compensation committee considers whether individual base salaries reflect responsibility levels and are reasonable, competitive

and fair. In addition, in setting base salaries, CVR Energy's compensation committee reviews published and other market survey and general industry survey information and considers the applicability of the salary data in view of the individual positions within CVR Energy.
Salaries are reviewed annually by the compensation committee with periodic informal reviews throughout the year. Adjustments, if any, are usually made effective January 1 of the year immediately following the review. The compensation committee most recently reviewed the level of base salary and cash bonus for each of the named executive officers in 2017 in conjunction with their responsibilities and expectations for 2018. Mr. Lamp's base salary of $1,000,000 was set in November 2017 in connection with the execution of his employment agreement. The compensation committee initially reviewed the base salaries of the remaining named executive officers in November 2017, and as of January 1, 2018 set salaries for Ms. Ball at $440,000 and for Mr. Walter at $312,000. The compensation committee recently reviewed the base salaries for Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter and revised them to $500,000 and $380,000, respectively, effective February 2018. Individual performance, market data and changes in the named executive officers' positions and levels of responsibility were considered. Among these three factors, slightly more weight was given to the market data.
Annual Bonus.    CVR Energy's annual bonus program is designed to meet each of its compensation objectives. Specifically, CVR Energy's annual bonus program rewards executives only for measured company performance, thereby aligning the executive's interest with those of its equity holders and encouraging executives to focus on targeted performance. Further, the program also provides executives with the opportunity to earn additional compensation, thereby making its total compensation package more competitive.
Information about total cash compensation paid by members of CVR Energy's industry is used in determining both the level of bonus award and the ratio of salary to bonus, as the compensation committee believes that maintaining a level of bonus and a ratio of fixed salary to bonus (which may fluctuate) that is in line with those of our competitors is an important factor in attracting and retaining executives. The compensation committee also believes that a significant portion of an executive's compensation should be at risk, which means that a portion of the executive's overall compensation is not guaranteed and is determined based on individual and company performance. Executives have greater potential bonus awards as the authority and responsibility of an executive increases. Each of the named executive officers is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus with a target bonus equal to a specified percentage of the relevant executive's annual base salary. For 2017, the target bonuses for the named executive officers were: John J. Lipinski (250%), Susan M. Ball (120%) and John R. Walter (110%). Mr. Pytosh maintained a target bonus of 135% for the portion of his bonus (40%) allocated to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including CVR Refining). Mr. Lamp was not eligible for an annual bonus for 2017 under the terms of his employment agreement. These target percentages were the result of individual negotiations between the named executive officers and CVR Energy, and were in correlation with the market data and other general industry survey information provided by CVR Energy. Specific bonus measures were determined by the compensation committee, following discussions with CVR Energy management.
In March 2011, CVR Energy adopted the CVR Energy, Inc. Performance Incentive Plan, and amended and restated such plan in April 2016 (the "CVR Energy PIP"), pursuant to which the named executive officers (other than Mr. Lamp) had the opportunity to earn bonuses in respect of 2017. The payment of annual bonuses for the 2017 performance year was dependent upon the achievement of financial, operational and safety measures, which comprised 35%, 45% and 20% of the annual bonuses, respectively for Messrs. Lipinski and Walter and Ms. Ball, and comprised 35%, 40% and 25% of the annual bonus for Mr. Pytosh. Specific bonus measures were determined by the compensation committee based on its review of relevant market data and discussions with management, and were selected with the goals of optimizing operations, maintaining financial stability and providing a safe work environment intended to maximize CVR Energy's overall performance resulting in increased stockholder value. The compensation committee also approved the threshold, target and maximum performance goals with respect to each measure. No payment is made with respect to the measures unless the threshold of the relevant performance measure is achieved.
The 2017 financial measures were: consolidated adjusted EBITDA for CVR Energy, which was derived from earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and adjusted for first-in, first-out (FIFO) accounting impacts, unrealized gains and losses on derivative transactions, turnaround expenses, loss on extinguishment of debt, asset impairment charges, non-controlling interest and board-directed actions.
The 2017 operational measures include the following: petroleum reliability for the total Coffeyville and Wynnewood refineries, measured by crude throughput barrels per day; crude transportation production, measured by gathered barrels per day; and fertilizer reliability for the Coffeyville and East Dubuque fertilizer plants, measured by adjusted equivalent tons of UAN production.
The 2017 safety measures include the aggregated EH&S results for the petroleum segment pursuant to the CVR Energy PIP and the aggregated EH&S results pursuant to the CVR Partners PIP, which include the following: consolidated OSHA recordable injury statistics (based upon OSHA injuries and inclusive of petroleum and fertilizer); consolidated OSHA lost time

injury statistics (based upon OSHA lost time injuries and inclusive of petroleum and fertilizer); consolidated EH&S severity statistics (based upon EH&S severity and inclusive of petroleum and fertilizer); consolidated air reportable releases (based upon EPA reportable quantity releases and inclusive of petroleum and fertilizer operations); consolidated air reportable release quantity (based upon EPA reportable quantity releases and inclusive of petroleum and fertilizer operations); consolidated tier 1 process safety events (based upon API process safety events of petroleum and fertilizer operations); and consolidated tier 2 process safety events (based upon API process safety events of petroleum and fertilizer operations).
The table below reflects the: (i) financial, operational and safety measures used to determine 2017 bonuses for the named executive officers; (ii) threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each measure; (iii) actual results with respect to each measure; and (iv) portion of the 2017 bonus that will be determined based on each such measure. The executives may receive 50% related to threshold levels, 100% for target levels, and 150% for maximum levels, respectively.
2017 Performance Measure
2017 Performance Goals
Threshold/Target/Maximum
2017 Actual ResultsPortion of Target Bonus Allocable to Measure
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA for CVR Energy
Threshold: $353.0 million
Target: $394.0 million
Maximum: $477.0 million
$458.2 million35% of bonus for Messrs. Lipinski, Pytosh and Walter and Ms. Ball
Petroleum Reliability Measures
Threshold: 178,200 bpd
Target: 190,200 bpd
Maximum: 200,700 bpd
 205,263 bpd30% of bonus for Messrs. Lipinski, Pytosh and Walter and Ms. Ball
Crude Transportation Production MeasuresThreshold: 72,000 gathered bpd
Target: 76,000 gathered bpd
Maximum: 80,000 gathered bpd
 85,735 gathered bpd5% of bonus Messrs. Lipinski and Walter and Ms. Ball and 10% for Mr. Pytosh
Fertilizer Reliability MeasuresThreshold: 1,920,000 tons
Target: 1,980,000 tons
Maximum: 2,090,000 tons
 2,050,658 tons10% of bonus for Messrs. Lipinski and Walter and Ms. Ball
Coffeyville Refinery Environmental Health & Safety Measures
Threshold: 5% of refining payout levels
Target: 10% of refining payout levels
Maximum: 15% of refining payout levels
13.5%10% of bonus for Messrs. Lipinski, Pytosh and Walter and Ms. Ball
Wynnewood Refinery Environmental Health & Safety MeasuresThreshold: 2.5% of refining payout levels
Target: 5% of refining payout levels
Maximum: 7.5% of refining payout levels
5.5%5% of bonus for Messrs. Lipinski and Walter and Ms. Ball
Wynnewood Refinery Environmental Health & Safety MeasuresThreshold: 5% of refining payout levels
Target: 10% of refining payout levels
Maximum: 15% of refining payout levels
11.0%10% of bonus for Mr. Pytosh
Fertilizer Environmental Health & Safety Measures
Threshold: 2.5% of nitrogen payout levels
Target: 5% of nitrogen payout levels
Maximum: 7.5% of nitrogen payout levels
5.2%5% of bonus for Messrs. Lipinski and Walter and Ms. Ball
Crude Transportation Environmental Health & Safety MeasuresThreshold: 2.5% of transport payout levels
Target: 5% of transport payout levels
Maximum: 7.5% of transport payout levels
6.5%5% of bonus for Mr. Pytosh
As a result of these performance levels, Messrs. Lipinski and Walter and Ms. Ball earned approximately 138.42% and Mr. Pytosh (with respect to the portion of his bonus (40%) allocated to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including CVR Refining)) earned approximately 139.54% of their respective target annual bonuses.
Equity-Based Incentive Awards
CVR Energy also uses equity-based incentives to reward long-term performance of its named executive officers. The issuance of equity incentives to executive officers is intended to satisfy CVR Energy's compensation program objectives by generating significant future value for each named executive officer if CVR Energy's performance is outstanding and the value of CVR Energy's equity increases for all of its stockholders. The compensation committee believes that its equity-based incentives promote long-term retention of executives.
CVR Energy established a long-term incentive plan in October 2007 (the "CVR Energy LTIP") in connection with its initial public offering. In addition, CVR Energy has historically issued incentive units outside of the CVR Energy LTIP, but based on the equity of CVR Refining and otherwise consistent with the terms of the CVR Energy LTIP. The compensation committee may elect to make grants of restricted stock, options, restricted stock units or other equity-based grants under the CVR Energy LTIP, or make grants of incentive units, in each case, in its discretion or may recommend grants to the Board for its approval, as determined by the committeeCompensation Committee in its discretion. Effective December 2020, the Compensation Committee awarded to Mr. Pytosh 93,288 phantom units of the Partnership, as part of his 2021 compensation, which phantom units vest ratably over three years, subject to the terms and conditions of the award agreement.


Perquisites.    CVR Energy pays for the cost of supplemental life insurance for certain of its named executive officers. Except for the premiums associated with such supplemental life insurance, theThe total value of all perquisites and personal benefits provided to each of its named executive officers in 20172020 was less than $10,000.

Benefits. During 2020, all the named executive officers participated in the health benefits, welfare and retirement plans of CVR Energy.

Other Forms of Compensation.Mr. Lamp has and Mr. Lipinski previously had, provisions in their respectivehis employment agreements with CVR Energy that provide for severance benefits in the event a termination of theirhis employment under certain circumstances. These severance provisions are described below in " — Change-in-Control“Change-in-Control and Termination Payments"Payments.” In September 2018, Messrs. Pytosh and were negotiated betweenBley and Mses. Jackson and Buhrig became subject to a Change in Control Severance Plan (the “CVI Severance Plan”) which provides for severance benefits in the applicableevent of a termination of his or her employment under certain circumstances. These severance provisions are described below in “Change-in-Control and Termination Payments.”

2020 Named Executive Officer Compensation - CVR Energy

The objectives, considerations and process utilized by the CVI Compensation Committee in general, as well as in setting 2020 compensation for named executive officerofficers of CVR Energy was virtually identical to the objectives, considerations, process, and structure used by the Compensation Committee. Related to 2020, the CVI Compensation Committee approved:
2020 Compensation Structure. Compensation structure consistent with the compensation structure approved by the Compensation Committee including a mix of base salary, performance-based bonus compensation, and long-term incentives;
December 31, 2020 | 87


2020 Base Salaries. Base salaries for Messrs. Lamp, Pytosh (as to 40% of his base salary), and Bley and Mses. Jackson and Buhrig, of $1,000,000; $227,033; $289,626; $470,459; and $538,125, respectively;
2020 Equity-Based Incentive Awards. Incentive units in connection with the long-term incentive plan of CVR Energy.Energy (the “CVI LTIP”) granted December 2019 for Messrs. Lamp, Pytosh, and Bley and Mses. Jackson and Buhrig of 32,737; 9,620; 3,688; 11,960; and 13,422, respectively, which vest in one-third increments each December following the date of award, subject to the terms and conditions of the award agreement;
2020 Performance-Based Bonus Plan. The 2020 CVI Plan, including target payouts as a percentage of base salary of 150% for Mr. Lamp, 135% for Mr. Pytosh, 120% for each of Mses. Jackson and Buhrig and 60% for Mr. Bley, contained terms and performance measures substantially similar to the performance-based bonus plan of CVI for 2019 (the “2019 CVI Plan”) and the 2020 UAN Plan subject to adjustment of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Threshold to reflect changed inventory accounting treatment. The peer group in the 2020 CVI Plan is the same as the 2019 CVI Plan, and included six publicly traded petroleum refining and marketing companies the CVI Compensation Committee considered to be similar to CVR Energy with respect to operations and also competitive with CVR Energy for executive talent (Valero Energy Corp.; Marathon Petroleum Corp.; PBF Energy Inc.; Delek US Holdings, Inc.; HollyFrontier Corp.; Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.). In February 2021, the CVI Compensation Committee evaluated the performance metrics contained in the 2020 CVI Plan and determined that, due to market conditions including the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the refining industry, CVR Energy did not meet the Adjusted EBITDA threshold contained in the 2020 CVI Plan. As a result, the CVI Compensation Committee awarded no payouts to the named executive officers under the 2020 CVI Plan. However, based on individual performance, significant achievements and related factors, the CVI Compensation Committee approved discretionary bonuses to Messrs. Pytosh and Bley and to Mses. Jackson and Buhrig, of $21,000, $7,700, $19,600, and $25,500, respectively.
December 31, 2020 | 88


Compensation Committee Report

The compensation committeeCompensation Committee of our general partner has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on this review and discussion, the compensation committeeCompensation Committee recommended to the board of directorsBoard that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report.



Compensation Committee
Compensation Committee
Frank M. Muller, Jr. (Chairman)
(Chair)
Andrew Langham
February 23, 2021



December 31, 2020 | 89


Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to the named executive officers during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019, and 2015. In the case of named executive officers who are employed by CVR Energy, all2018. All compensation paid to such named executive officers is reflected in the table, not only the portion of compensation attributable to services performed for our business.
Name and Principal Position Year Salary ($) 
Bonus
($)(1)
 
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
 
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
 Total ($)
John J. Lipinski, 2017 1,000,000
     3,460,500
 38,698
 4,499,198
Executive Chairman 2016 1,000,000
 
 
 5,898,750
 36,949
 6,935,699
  2015 1,000,000
 
 
 7,187,500
 32,214
 8,219,714
David L. Lamp, 2017 42,308
 75,000
 
 1,500,000
 
 1,617,308
Executive Chairman              
               
Mark A. Pytosh, 2017 525,000
   1,069,996
 736,349
 17,442
 2,348,787
Chief Executive Officer 2016 525,000
   1,050,011
 789,051
 17,127
 2,381,189
  2015 510,000
 
 1,050,002
 941,703
 17,076
 2,518,781
Susan M. Ball, 2017 425,000
   969,987
 705,942
 19,612
 2,120,541
Chief Financial Officer 2016 425,000
   945,009
 489,345
 19,082
 1,878,436
  2015 415,000
 
 945,003
 673,338
 18,703
 2,052,044
John R. Walter 2017 299,616
   492,990
 456,786
 16,987
 1,266,379
Senior Vice President, 2016 290,000
   450,005
 297,497
 16,517
 1,054,019
General Counsel, and Secretary 2015 275,000
 
 431,018
 405,625
 16,330
 1,127,973
William White 2017 278,000
   299,999
 178,209
 23,108
 779,316
Executive Vice President 2016 278,000
   290,000
 270,883
 21,657
 860,540
Marketing and Operations 2015 270,000
 
 280,007
 321,905
 20,251
 892,163
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
(1)
Bonus
(2)
Stock Awards (3)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (1, 4)
All Other Compensation
(5)
Total
David L. Lamp, Executive Chairman2020$1,000,000 $— $2,144,005 $— $20,801 $3,164,806 
20191,000,000 — 1,500,000 1,770,000 20,364 4,290,364 
20181,000,000 — 1,500,035 1,875,000 20,064 4,395,099 
Mark A. Pytosh, President and Chief Executive Officer2020$567,582 $21,000 $1,772,104 $535,700 $19,511 $2,915,897 
2019551,050 457,300 1,102,000 818,000 20,364 2,948,714 
2018535,000 310,500 1,070,011 799,500 17,742 2,732,753 
Tracy D. Jackson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2020$470,459 $19,600 $807,565 $— $18,390 $1,316,014 
2019456,756 200,800 548,000 621,300 17,865 1,844,721 
2018272,715 96,400 1,044,019 412,400 91,901 1,917,435 
Melissa M. Buhrig, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary2020$538,125 $25,500 $923,340 $— $17,941 $1,504,906 
2019512,500 236,100 615,000 737,000 99,410 2,200,010 
2018230,769 125,800 1,500,039 349,000 301,934 2,507,542 
Matthew W. Bley, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller2020$289,626 $7,700 $248,697 $— $17,561 $563,584 
2019281,190 96,100 169,000 189,200 17,044 752,534 
2018185,098 38,000 340,015 130,500 119,138 812,751 


(1)The amount in this column for Mr. Lamp includes a $75,000 relocation bonus.
(1)For 2018, amounts in the “Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns for Mses. Jackson and Buhrig and Mr. Bley were prorated for the year in which their employment commenced based on their start dates in May 2018, July 2018 and April 2018, respectively.
(2)Amounts in this column include the discretionary bonus amount, if any, paid based on individual performance, significant achievements and related factors.
(3)Amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value, as calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), of incentive units granted to each named executive officer during the periods specified in connection with the CVI LTIP, and for Mr. Pytosh, incentive units granted in connection with the CVI LTIP plus phantom units granted under the CVR Partners LTIP, except that, for 2018 for Mses. Jackson and Buhrig and Mr. Bley, this amount also includes incentive awards made in connection with their hire of $522,003, $900,017, and $175,001, respectively.
(4)Amounts in this column reflect: (a) for 2020, for Mr. Pytosh, amounts earned under the 2020 UAN Plan, which are expected to be paid in March 2021; and (b) for 2019 and 2018, amounts earned under the applicable performance-based bonus plans for CVR Energy and, with respect to Mr. Pytosh, also for the Partnership.
(5)Amounts in this column for 2020 include the following: (a) a company contribution under the CVR Energy 401(k) plan of $17,100 for each of Messrs. Lamp, Pytosh, and Bley and Mses. Jackson and Buhrig; and (b) a company contribution under the CVR Energy basic life insurance program of $3,701 for Mr. Lamp, $2,411 for Mr. Pytosh, $1,290 for Ms. Jackson, $841 for Ms. Buhrig, and $461 for Mr. Bley. Amounts in this column for 2019 include the following: (a) a company contribution under the CVR Energy 401(k) plan of $16,800 for each of Messrs. Lamp, Pytosh, and Bley and Ms. Jackson, and $8,577 for Ms. Buhrig; (b) a company contribution under the CVR Energy basic life insurance program of $3,564 for Messrs. Lamp and Pytosh, $1,065 for Ms. Jackson, $540 for Ms. Buhrig, and $244 for Mr. Bley; and (c) a company relocation contribution of $90,293 for Ms. Buhrig. Amounts in this column for 2018 include the following: (a) a company contribution under the CVR Energy 401(k) plan of $16,500 for each of Messrs. Lamp, and Pytosh and Ms. Jackson; $9,423 for Ms. Buhrig and $11,106 for Mr. Bley; (b) a company contribution under the CVR Energy basic life insurance program of $3,564 for Mr. Lamp, $1,242 for Mr. Pytosh, $401 for Ms. Jackson, $228 for Ms. Buhrig, and $141 for Mr. Bley; and (c) $75,000, $292,282 and $107,891 in relocation expenses for Mses. Jackson and Buhrig and Mr. Bley, respectively, which includes moving expenses and other relocation services and payments including a related tax gross-up of $114,788 and $34,261 for Ms. Buhrig and Mr. Bley, respectively.

(2)For 2015, 2016 and 2017, amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of phantom units granted to Mr. Pytosh and Mr. White pursuant to the CVR Partners LTIP, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. In addition, for 2015, 2016 and 2017, amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of incentive units granted to Mr. Pytosh, Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter by CVR Energy. We pay for our allocated portion of the incentive unit awards pursuant to the services agreement. Assumptions relied upon in such valuations are set forth in footnote 4 to our audited consolidated financial statements. The phantom and incentive units generally vest over three years, provided that the executive continues to serve as an employee of the Partnership (with respect to phantom units), CVR Energy (with respect to incentive units) or one of their respective subsidiaries or parents on each such date, and subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances as described in more detail in the section titled "Change-in-Control and Termination Payments" below.
(3)For Messrs. Pytosh and White, amounts in this column for 2017, 2016 and 2015 reflect amounts earned pursuant to the CVR Partners PIP in respect of performance during 2017, 2016 and 2015, which are to be paid or were paid in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For Messrs. Lipinski, Pytosh and Walter and Ms. Ball, amounts in this column for 2017, 2016 and 2015 reflect amounts earned pursuant to the CVR Energy PIP in respect of performance during 2017, 2016 and 2015, which are to be paid or were paid in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For Mr. Lipinski, the amounts for 2016 and 2015 also reflect the aggregate grant date fair value for certain performance units granted in December 2016 and December 2015, of $3,500,000 for each year, that are valued based on a performance factor that is tied to certain operational performance metrics. For Mr. Lamp, the amount for 2017 reflects the aggregate grant date fair value for

certain performance units granted in November 2017,December 31, 2020 | 90


(4)Amounts in this column for 2017 include the following: (i) a company contribution under the CVR Energy 401(k) plan of $16,200 for Messrs. Lipinski, Pytosh, Walter and White and Ms. Ball; (ii) $15,640 for Mr. Lipinski, $2,170 for Ms. Ball, $257 for Mr. Walter and $3,387 for Mr. White in premiums paid by CVR Energy on behalf of the executive officer with respect to its executive life insurance program; and (iii) $6,858 for Mr. Lipinski, $1,242 for Mr. Pytosh, $1,242 for Ms. Ball, $530 for Mr. Walter and $3,521 for Mr. White in taxable value (inclusive of associated premiums) provided by CVR Energy on behalf of the executive officer with respect to its basic life insurance program.
As described in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, named executive officers, other than Messrs.including Mr. Pytosh, and White are employed by CVR EnergyServices and dedicated only a portion of their time to our business in 2017. Furthermore,2020. Mr. Pytosh dedicated a portion of his time (approximately 30%) to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including CVR Refining) during 2017.2020.

The following table outlines 2017 cash2020 compensation paid or granted to the named executive officers who are employed by CVR EnergyServices and was attributable to their service to our business, based on the approximate percentage of time that each of them dedicated to our business during 2017.2020, including the Stock Award and Non-Equity Incentive Compensation for Mr. Pytosh granted to him by the Compensation Committee.
NameSalaryStock Awards (1)Non-Equity Incentive
Compensation
Other
David L. Lamp$100,000 $214,401 $— $2,080 
Mark A. Pytosh340,549 1,123,188 535,700 11,707 
Tracy D. Jackson84,683 145,362 — 3,310 
Melissa M. Buhrig107,625 184,668 — 3,588 
Matthew W. Bley57,925 49,739 — 3,512 
NameSalary ($) Stock Awards ($) 
Non-Equity Incentive
Compensation($)
 Other ($)
John J. Lipinski150,000
  519,075 5,805
David L. Lamp6,346
  225,000 11,250
Susan M. Ball127,500
 290,996 211,783 5,884
John R. Walter116,850
 192,266 178,147 6,625


The following table outlines 2017 cash compensation paid(1)Amounts in these columns reflect the attributable grant date fair value, as calculated in accordance with ASC 718, of (i) certain incentive units awarded to Messrs. Lamp, Pytosh, and Bley and Mses. Jackson and Buhrig by CVR Energy during 2020; and (ii) phantom units awarded to Mr. Pytosh for time he spent attributable to service tounder the CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including CVR Refining).Partners LTIP during 2020.
NameSalary ($) Stock Awards ($) Non-Equity Incentive Compensation ($) Other ($)
Mark A. Pytosh157,500
 427,997
 395,596
 5,233


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information concerning amounts that could have been earned by our named executive officers under the CVR Energy PIP,2020 UAN Plan and the 2020 CVI Plan, as well granted under the CVR Partners PIP, CVR Energy LTIP and CVR Partnersthe CVI LTIP, as applicable, during 2017,2020.
 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (2)
 
Name
Bonus Plan /
Award Type
Grant DateThreshold (3)TargetMaximumNumber
of Shares of
Stock or Units
Grant Date Fair Value
David L. Lamp2020 CVI Plann/a$62,250 $1,500,000 $2,250,000 — — 
Incentive Units12/9/20— — — 134,168 $2,144,005 
Mark A. Pytosh2020 CVI Plann/a$12,720 $306,495 $459,743 — — 
2020 UAN Plann/a19,079 459,741 689,612 — — 
Incentive Units12/9/20— — — 40,608 $648,916 
Phantom Units12/9/20— — — 93,288 1,123,188 
Tracy D. Jackson2020 CVI Plann/a$23,429 $564,551 $846,827 — — 
Incentive Units12/9/20— — — 50,536 $807,565 
Melissa M. Buhrig2020 CVI Plann/a$26,799 $645,750 $968,625 — — 
Incentive Units12/9/20— — — 57,781 $923,340 
Matthew W. Bley2020 CVI Plann/a$7,212 $173,776 $260,664 — — 
Incentive Units12/9/20— — — 15,563 $248,697 

(1)Amounts in these columns reflect amounts that could have been earned by the named executive officers under the 2020 UAN Plan (with respect to Mr. Pytosh) or under the 2020 CVI Plan (with respect to Messrs. Lamp, Pytosh, and Bley and Mses. Jackson and Buhrig) in respect of 2020 performance with respect to each performance measure, excluding the impact of any individual discretionary performance adjustments. The performance measures and related goals for 2020 are set by the Compensation Committee and the CVI Compensation Committee, as wellapplicable, as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
(2)Amounts in these columns reflect the number of and grant date fair value, as calculated in accordance with ASC 718, of (i) certain incentive unit awards madeunits awarded to Messrs. Lamp, Pytosh, and Bley and Mses. Jackson and Buhrig by CVR Energy under the CVI LTIP during 2020; and (ii) phantom units awarded to Mr. Pytosh under the CVR Partners LTIP during 2020.
(3)For the 2020 CVI Plan and the 2020 UAN Plan, ‘Threshold’ represents the minimum payout under the 2020 CVI Plan and the 2020 UAN Plan, as applicable, assuming CVR Energy and the Partnership, as applicable, have satisfied the Adjusted EBITDA Threshold and
December 31, 2020 | 91


have achieved performance under one of the EH&S measures equal to the prior year performance, resulting in a payout of 50% of the 8.33% measure value, or 4.16% of total target payout. For more information and full description of the 2020 CVI Plan and the 2020 UAN Plan, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” However, in certain circumstances, including in the event the Adjusted EBITDA threshold is not achieved, the named executive officers may receive payout that is less than the Threshold or zero.

Employment Agreements

Employment Agreements with CVR Partners. None of our named executive officers.

 
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
    
 
All Other Stock
Awards: Number
of Shares of
Stock or Units (#)
 Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards (2)($)
NameGrant Date 
Threshold
($)
 
Target
($)
 
Maximum
($)
 
John J. Lipinski
 1,250,000
 2,500,000
 3,750,000
 
 
David L. Lamp11/01/2017
 1,050,000
 1,500,000
 1,650,000
    
Mark A. Pytosh
 212,625
 425,250
 637,875
 
 
 
 141,750
 283,500
 425,250
 
 
 12/29/2017
 
 
 
 185,014
 641,999
 12/29/2017
 
 
 
 32,999
 427,997
Susan M. Ball
 255,000
 510,000
 765,000
 
 
 12/29/2017
 
 
 
 74,787
 969,987
John R. Walter
 165,000
 330,000
 495,000
    
 12/29/2017
 
 
 
 38,010
 492,990
William White
 111,200
 222,400
 333,600
 
 
 12/29/2017
 
 
 
 86,455
 299,999

(1)Amounts in these columns reflect amounts that couldofficers have been earned by the named executive officers under the CVR Partners PIP (with respect to Messrs. Pytosh and White) or under the CVR Energy PIP (with respect to Messrs. Lipinski and Pytosh, Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter) in respect of 2017 performance at the threshold, target and maximum levels with respect to each performance measure. The performance measures and related goals for 2017 set by the compensation committee of our general partner and the compensation committee of CVR Energy, as applicable, are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. For Mr. Lamp, amounts reflect those that could be earned under certain performance units issued in November 2017 at threshold, target, and maximum based on performance factors that are tied to operational performance metrics.
(2)Amounts in this column reflect: (i) the grant date fair value of certain incentive units awarded to Mr. Pytosh, Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter by CVR Energy during 2017, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718; and (ii) the grant date fair value of phantom units awarded to Mr. Pytosh and Mr. White under the CVR Partners LTIP during 2017, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
Employment Agreements
John J. Lipinski.    CVR Energy most recently entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lipinski, as chief executive officer, effective as of January 1, 2016. The agreement had a two-year term and expired December 31, 2017 in connectionthe Partnership, the General Partner or their subsidiaries.

Employment Agreements with Mr. Lipinski's retirement. Mr. Lipinski received an annual base salary of $1,000,000 effective as of January 1, 2017. Mr. Lipinski was also eligible to receive a performance-based annual cash bonus with a target payment equal to 250% of his annual base salary for 2017, to be based upon individual and/or company performance criteria as established by the compensation committee of the board of directors of CVR Energy. In addition, Mr. Lipinski was entitled to participate in such health, insurance, retirement and other employee benefit plans and programsNone of CVR Energy as in effect from time to time on the same basis as other senior executives of CVR Energy. During the term of theour named executive officers have an employment agreement Mr. Lipinski was eligible to receive annually (commencing December 31, 2015) on the anniversary of the agreement date a grant of performance units pursuant to the CVR Energy LTIP having an aggregate value of $3.5 million. The material terms of the performance units are described below. Mr. Lipinski was also eligible to receive an incentive payment of $5 million if (i) CVR Energy (or a subsidiary thereof) obtained an equity or management interest in a logistics master limited partnership (a "Logistics MLP") in a transaction approved by CVR Energy’s (or such subsidiary’s) Board of Directors, provided such Logistics MLP results from an initial public offering, spin transaction, acquisition or joint venture, and (ii) such Logistics MLP was trading on a national securities exchange on or prior to December 31, 2017. Payment of the incentive payment was conditioned upon (x) the foregoing performance objectives being achieved, and (y) Mr. Lipinski remaining employed with CVR Energy through December 31, 2017 (unless, if an employment termination occurs earlieror its subsidiaries other than December 31, 2017, such termination (A) occurs after achievement of such performance objectives and (B) is carried out by CVR Energy without cause or by Mr. Lipinski for good reason (as such terms are defined in the employment agreement)). The employment agreement provides that any such incentive payment will be the obligation of the Logistics MLP and not of CVR Energy. The agreement required Mr. Lipinski to abide by a perpetual restrictive covenant relating to non-disclosure and non-disparagement and also included covenants relating

to non-solicitation and non-competition that govern during his employment and thereafter for the period severance is paid and, if no severance is paid, for six months following termination of employment. In addition, Mr. Lipinski's agreement provided for certain severance payments that may be due following the termination of his employment under certain circumstances, which are described below under " — Change-in-Control and Termination Payments."
David L. Lamp. On November 1, 2017, CVR Energy entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lamp, as chief executive officer of CVR Energy, effective DecemberJanuary 1, 2017.2018. The agreement has a four-year term continuing through December 31, 2021, unless otherwise terminated by CVR Energy or Mr. Lamp. Mr. Lamp receives an annual base salary of $1,000,000 and is also eligible to receive a performance-based annual cash bonus with a target payment equal to 150% of his annual base salary, to be based upon individual and/or company performance criteria as established by the compensation committee of the board of directors of CVR Energy.CVI Compensation Committee. In addition, Mr. Lamp is entitled to participate in such health, insurance, retirement and other employee benefit plans and programs of CVR Energy as in effect from time to time on the same basis as other senior executives of CVR Energy. During the term of the agreement, Mr. Lamp is also eligible to receive annually (commencing on November 1, 2017) on the anniversary of the agreement date a grant of performance units pursuant to the CVR EnergyCVI LTIP having an aggregate value of $1.5 million. The material termsmillion, or such other form of award as may be agreed upon by Mr. Lamp and the performance units are described below.CVI Compensation Committee. Mr. Lamp is also eligible to receive an incentive payment of $10 million (the “Incentive Payment”) pursuant to an additional performance unit award under the CVR Energy LTIP. The Incentive Payment becomes payable if either the conditions set forth in the employment agreement or the conditions set forth in a separate Performance Unit Award Agreement (“PU Award Agreement”) (described below) are fulfilled. Pursuant toThe Incentive Payment becomes payable: (a) under the employment agreement, the Incentive Payment becomes payable if on or prior to December 31, 2021, either (a)(i) a transaction is consummated which constitutes a change in control (as defined in the employment agreement), or (b)(ii) the boardBoard approves a transaction which, if consummated, would constitute a change in control and such transaction is consummated on or prior to December 31, 2022.2022; or (b) under the PU Award Agreement, the average closing price of CVR Energy’s common stock over the 30-trading day period beginning on January 4, 2022 and ending on February 15, 2022 is equal to or greater than $60.00 per share (subject to any equitable adjustments required to account for splits, dividends, combinations, acquisitions, dispositions, recapitalizations and the like). Payment of the Incentive Payment is conditioned upon Mr. Lamp remaining employed with CVR Energy through December 30, 2021 (unless terminated by CVR Energy without cause or by Mr. Lamp for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement) on or after the satisfaction of the foregoing conditions and prior to December 30, 2021). Subject to the foregoing conditions, the Incentive Payment will, if it becomes payable, be paid within 30 days following the consummation of the transaction constituting a change in control.days. For the avoidance of doubt, Mr. Lamp will not under any circumstance be entitled to receive more than one Incentive Payment and if he becomes entitled to the Incentive Payment under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Lamp will immediately forfeit any right to payments under the PU Award Agreement. The employment agreement requiredrequires Mr. Lamp to abide by a perpetual restrictive covenant relating to non-disclosure and non-disparagement and also includedincludes covenants relating to non-solicitation and non-competition that govern during his employment and thereafter for the period severance is paid and, if no severance is paid, for six months following termination of employment. In addition, Mr. Lamp'sLamp’s employment agreement providedprovides for certain severance payments that may be due following the termination of his employment under certain circumstances, which are described below under " — Change-in-Control“Change-in-Control and Termination Payments."” The description of these agreements are qualified in their entirety by the text of such agreements, each as referenced as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Mark A. Pytosh.    Our general partner entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Pytosh effective as of May 5, 2014, as amended December 19, 2014 and December 30, 2016. The agreement had a term extending through
December 31, 2017, unless otherwise terminated by CVR GP or Mr. Pytosh. The agreement expired pursuant to its terms on December 31, 2017, provided, Mr. Pytosh continues to be employed by our general partner. Mr. Pytosh received an annual base salary2020 | 92


Table of $525,000 effective as of January 1, 2017. Mr. Pytosh was also eligible to receive a performance-based annual cash bonus with a target payment equal to 135% of his annual base salary for 2017, to be based upon individual and/or company performance criteria as established by the compensation committee of the board of directors of CVR GP; provided, in 2015 and thereafter, a portion of his bonus was based upon individual and/or company performance criteria established by the compensation committee of the board of directors of CVR Energy to the extent Mr. Pytosh performs services for CVR Energy. Mr. Pytosh was also entitled to participate in such health, insurance, retirement and other employee benefit plans and programs as in effect from time to time on the same basis as other senior executives. The agreement requires Mr. Pytosh to abide by perpetual restrictive covenants relating to non-disclosure and non-disparagement, and also include covenants relating to non-solicitation and non-competition during his employment and for six months following termination of employment. In addition, the agreement provided for certain severance payments that may be due following the termination of employment under certain circumstances, which are described below under " — Change-in-Control and Termination Payments."Contents
Susan M. Ball, John R. Walter and William White.    Ms. Ball and Messrs. Walter and White do not have employment agreements. Their current base salaries are as follows: Ms. Ball - $500,000; Mr. Walter - $380,000; and Mr. White - $278,000. In addition, each such named executive officer is entitled to participate in such health, insurance, retirement and other employee benefit plans and programs as in effect from time to time on the same basis as other senior executives.



Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth information concerning outstanding equity awards granted pursuant to the CVR Partners LTIP that were held by certain of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2017,2020, as well as outstanding incentive unit awards made by CVR Energy pursuant to the CVI LTIP and for which the Partnership will share in the expense. TheThis table also includes incentive unit awards made by CVR Energy to Mr. Pytosh by CVR Energy for which the Partnership does not share in the expense.
 Stock Awards
Name
Number of Shares or Units of Stock
That Have Not Vested (#)
 
Market Value of Shares or Units of
Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(1)
Mark A. Pytosh26,683
(2)106,999
 6,849
(3)119,789
 77,348
(4)255,248
 29,756
(5)520,432
 185,014
(6)606,846
 32,999
(7)546,133
Susan M. Ball15,411
(3)269,538
 66,950
(5)1,170,956
 74,787
(7)1,237,725
John R. Walter7,029
(3)122,937
 31,881
(5)557,599
 38,010
(7)629,066
William White11,859
(2)47,555
 35,604
(4)117,493
 86,455
(6)283,572

(1)This column represents the number of unvested units outstanding on such date, multiplied by the closing price of the units on December 29, 2017, which: (i) for purposes of the phantom units described in footnote (2) All of the outstanding shares or units reflected below was $4.01 (the closing price of $3.28 plus $0.73 in accrued distributions); (ii) for purposes of the incentive units described in footnote (3) below, was $17.49 (the closing price of $16.55 plus $0.94 in accrued distributions); (iii) for purposes of the phantom units described in footnote (4) below was $3.30 (the closing price of $3.28 plus $0.02 in accrued distributions); (iv) for purposes of the incentive units described in footnote (5) below, was $17.49 (the closing price of $16.55 plus $0.94 in accrued distributions); (v) for purposes of the phantom units described in footnote (6) below, was $3.28; and (vi) for purposes of the incentive units described in footnote (7) below, was $16.55.
(2)The phantom units reflected were issued on December 18, 2015 and are scheduled to vest on December 18, 2018, provided the executive continues to serve as an employee of our general partner, a subsidiary or parent on such date, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances as described in more detail in the section titled "Change-in-Control and Termination Payments" below.
(3)The incentive units reflected were issued on December 18, 2015 and are scheduled to vest on December 18, 2018, provided the executive continues to serve as an employee of CVR Energy or one of its subsidiaries on such date, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances as described in more detail in the section titled "Change-in-Control and Termination Payments" below. The Partnership will share in its prorated share of the costs associated with these awards based on the percentage of time that the executive dedicates to our business during the vesting term.
(4)The phantom units reflected were issued on December 31, 2016 and are scheduled to vest in one-half increments on December 16, 2018 and 2019, provided the executive continues to serve as an employee of our general partner, a subsidiary or parent on such date, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances as described in more detail in the section titled "Change-in-Control and Termination Payments" below.
(5)The incentive units reflected were issued on December 31, 2016 and are scheduled to vest in one-half increments on December 16, 2018 and 2019, provided the executive continues to serve as an employee of CVR Energy or one of its

subsidiaries on such date, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances as described in more detail in the section titled "Change-in-Control“Change-in-Control and Termination Payments"Payments” below.
 Equity Awards That Have Not Vested
NameAward TypeGrant Date (1)Number of Shares or
Units
Market Value of Shares or Units (2)
David L. LampIncentive Units12/14/1813,217 (3)$253,106 
Incentive Units12/13/1921,824 (3)351,366 
Incentive Units12/09/20134,168 (3)$1,999,103 
Mark A. PytoshPhantom Units12/14/185,661 $113,333 
Incentive Units12/14/183,771 72,215 
Phantom Units12/13/1912,795 204,976 
Incentive Units12/13/196,413 103,249 
Phantom Units12/09/2093,288 1,494,474 
Incentive Units12/09/2040,608 605,059 
Tracy D. JacksonIncentive Units12/14/184,599 (3)$88,071 
Incentive Units12/13/197,973 (3)128,365 
Incentive Units12/09/2050,536 (3)752,986 
Melissa M. BuhrigIncentive Units12/14/185,287 (3)$101,246 
Incentive Units12/13/198,948 (3)144,063 
Incentive Units12/09/2057,781 (3)860,937 
Matthew W. BleyIncentive Units12/14/181,454 (3)$27,844 
Incentive Units12/13/192,458 (3)39,574 
Incentive Units12/09/2015,563 (3)231,889 

(1)The incentive or phantom units generally vest in one-third annual increments in December of each of the three years following the Grant Date, subject to the terms of the applicable award agreement.
(2)This column represents the number of unvested units outstanding on December 31, 2020, multiplied by: (a) for incentive units issued on December 9, 2020, $14.90 (equal to the December 31, 2020, closing price of CVR Energy common stock (the “CVI Closing Price”)); (b) for incentive units issued on December 13, 2019, $16.10 (equal to the CVI Closing Price plus $1.20 in accrued dividends); (c) for incentive units issued on December 14, 2018, $19.15 (equal to the CVI Closing Price plus $4.25 in accrued dividends); (d) for phantom units issued on December 9, 2020, $16.02 (equal to the December 31, 2020 closing price of Partnership common units (the “UAN Closing Price”)); (e) for phantom units issued on December 13, 2019, $16.02 (equal to the UAN Closing Price); and (f) for phantom units issued on December 14, 2018, $20.02 (equal to the UAN Closing Price, plus $4.00 in accrued distributions which has been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Unit Split).
(3)The Partnership will share in its prorated share of the costs associated with these awards based on the percentage of time that the executive dedicates to our business during the vesting term.

(6)The phantom units reflected were issued on December 29, 2017 and are scheduled to vest in one-third annual increments on December 15 of 2018 through 2020, provided the executive continues to serve as an employee of our general partner, a subsidiary or parent on such date, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances as described in more detail in the section titled "Change-in-Control and Termination Payments" below.
(7)The incentive units reflected were issued on December 29, 2017 and are scheduled to vest in one-third annual increments on December 15 of 2018 through 2020, provided the executive continues to serve as an employee of CVR Energy or one of its subsidiaries on such date, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances as described in more detail in the section titled "Change-in-Control and Termination Payments" below. The Partnership will share in its prorated share of the costs associated with these awards based on the percentage of time that the executive dedicates to our business during the vesting term.
December 31, 2020 | 93


Equity Awards Vested During Fiscal Year 20172020

This table reflects the portion of phantom units granted pursuant to the CVR Partners LTIP as well as incentive unit awards made by CVR Energy for which the Partnership shared in the expense that vested during 2017. The2020. This table also includes incentive unit awards made to Mr. Pytosh by CVR Energy that vested during 2017 and for which the Partnership did not share in the expense.2020.
Equity Awards
NameAward TypeNumber of Shares or Units Acquired on VestingValue Realized on Vesting
David L. LampIncentive Units13,217 $261,697 (1)
Incentive Units10,913 181,047 (2)
Mark A. PytoshIncentive Units10,999 $143,207 (3)
Phantom Units6,167 99,905 (4)(5)
Incentive Units3,771 74,666 (1)
Phantom Units5,662 88,780 (4)(5)
Incentive Units3,207 53,204 (2)
Phantom Units6,398 65,324 (6)
Tracy D. JacksonIncentive Units10,229 $123,362 (7)
Incentive Units4,600 91,080 (1)
Incentive Units3,987 66,144 (2)
Melissa M. BuhrigIncentive Units13,357 $161,085 (7)
Incentive Units5,287 104,683 (1)
Incentive Units4,474 74,224 (2)
Matthew W. BleyIncentive Units4,023 $50,569 (8)
Incentive Units1,454 28,789 (1)
Incentive Units1,230 20,406 (2)
 Equity Awards 
Named Executive Officer
Number of Shares or Units
Acquired on Vesting (#)
 
Value Realized
on Vesting ($)
 
Mark A. Pytosh22,198
 123,865
(1)
 7,666
 136,685
(2)
 26,684
 112,873
(3)
 6,849
 95,954
(4)
 38,675
 136,136
(5)
 14,878
 208,441
(6)
Susan M. Ball17,474
 311,561
(2)
 15,411
 215,908
(4)
 33,476
 468,999
(6)
John R. Walter7,751
 138,200
(2)
 7,029
 98,476
(4)
 15,941
 223,333
(6)
William White9,793
 54,645
(1)
 11,860
 50,168
(3)
 17,803
 62,667
(5)

(1)For phantom units that vested during fiscal year 2017, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the average closing price of CVR Partners' common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $1.98 per unit.
(2)For incentive units that vested during fiscal year 2017, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the average closing price of CVR Refining's common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $4.06 per unit.
(3)For phantom units that vested during fiscal year 2017, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the average closing price of CVR Partners' common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $0.73 per unit.

(1)For incentive units for Messrs. Lamp, Pytosh, and Bley and Mses. Jackson and Buhrig that vested during fiscal year 2020, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the average closing price of CVR Energy’s common stock in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) $4.25 in accrued dividends.
(4)For incentive units that vested during fiscal year 2017, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the average closing price of CVR Refining's common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $0.94 per unit.

(2)For incentive units for Messrs. Lamp, Pytosh, and Bley and Mses. Jackson and Buhrig that vested during fiscal year 2020, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the average closing price of CVR Energy’s common stock in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) $1.20 in accrued dividends
(5)For phantom units that vested during fiscal year 2017, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the average closing price of CVR Partners' common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $0.02 per unit.
(6)For incentive units that vested during fiscal year 2017, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the average closing price of CVR Refining's common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $0.94 per unit.
(3)For incentive units for Mr. Pytosh that vested during fiscal year 2020, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the fair market value of CVR Refining’s common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $2.52 per unit.
(4)For phantom units that vested during fiscal year 2020, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the average closing price of CVR Partners’ common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $4.00 per unit.
(5)Accrued distributions have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Unit Split.
(6)For phantom units that vested during fiscal year 2020, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to the average closing price of CVR Partners’ common units in accordance with the agreement.
(7)For incentive units for Mses. Jackson and Buhrig that vested during fiscal year 2020, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the fair market value of CVR Refining’s common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $1.56 per unit.
(8)For incentive units that vested during fiscal year 2020, the amount reflected includes a per unit value equal to (i) the fair market value of CVR Refining’s common units in accordance with the agreement, and (ii) accrued distributions of $2.07 per unit.

Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner

Our general partnerGeneral Partner and its affiliates are reimbursed for expenses incurred on our behalf under the services agreement.Corporate MSA. See "Certain“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence - Agreements with CVR Energy and CVR Refining — Services Agreement" for a description of our services agreement.its Subsidiaries”. These expenses include the costs of employee, officer and director compensation and benefits properly allocable to us, and all other expenses necessary or appropriate to the conduct of our business and allocable to us. These expenses also include costs incurred by CVR Energy or its affiliates in rendering corporate staff and support services to us pursuant to the services agreement,Corporate MSA, including a pro-rata portion of the compensation of CVR Energy'sEnergy’s executive officers who provide
December 31, 2020 | 94


management services to us based on the amount of time such executive officers devote to our business. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the total amount paid to our general partner and its affiliates (including amounts paid to CVR Energy pursuant to the services agreement)Corporate MSA) was approximately $19.3$12.6 million.

Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner determines which of its affiliates'affiliates’ expenses are allocable to us and the services agreementCorporate MSA provides that CVR Energy invoice us monthly for services provided thereunder. Our general partnerGeneral Partner may dispute the costs that CVR Energy charges us under the services agreement,Corporate MSA, but we are not entitled to a refund of any disputed cost unless it is determined not to be a reasonable cost incurred by CVR Energy in connection with services it provided.

Change-in-Control and Termination Payments
Under the terms
Certain of certain of theour named executive officers' employment agreements with our general partner or CVR Energy (as applicable), theyofficers are entitled to severance and other benefits from us or CVR Energy following the termination of their employment under certain circumstances. The amounts of potential post-employment payments and benefits in the narrative and table below assume that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2017, are based on salaries as of December 31, 2017 and assume the payment of bonuses at 100% of target. Pursuant

David L. Lamp. Under his employment agreement, if Mr. Lamp’s employment is terminated due to the services agreement that we entered into with CVR Energy, we are responsible for the payment of our proportionate share of the severance and other benefits costs following the termination of employment of the executive officers that are employed by CVR Energy.
John J. Lipinski.    If Mr. Lipinski's employment was terminated eitherdeath or disability, or by CVR Energy without cause and other than for disability or by Mr. Lipinski for good reason (as these terms are definednot in connection with a change in control, he (or his employment agreement), thenestate, in additionthe event of termination due to death) is entitled to: (a) any accrued amounts, including any base salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination, any earned but unpaid annual bonus for completed fiscal years, any unused accrued paid time off and any unreimbursed expenses ("Accrued Amounts"), Mr. Lipinski would have been entitled to receive as severance: (i)amounts, plus (b) salary continuation for the lesser of six months and the remainder of the term of the employment agreement (such period, the "Lipinski“Lamp Post-Employment Period"Period”); and (ii), plus (c) a pro-rata bonus for the year in which termination occurs based on actual results. In addition, ifFor terminations due to disability, Mr. Lipinski's employment was terminated either by CVR Energy without cause and other than for disability or by Mr. Lipinski for good reason (as these terms are defined in his employment agreement) within one year following a change in control (as defined in his employment agreement) or in specified circumstances prior to and in connection with a change in control, Mr. Lipinski would have been entitled to receive 1/6 of his target bonus for the year of termination for each month of the Lipinski Post-Employment Period.
If Mr. Lipinski's employment was terminated as a result of his disability, then in addition to any Accrued Amounts and any payments to be made to Mr. Lipinski under disability plan(s), Mr. Lipinski would have beenLamp is also entitled to disability payments during the Lipinski Post-Employment Period equal to the base rate of Mr. Lipinski's base salary as in effect immediately before his disability (the estimated total amount of this payment is set forth in the relevant table below) and a pro-rata bonus for the year in which termination occurs based on actual results. As a condition to receiving these severance payments and benefits, Mr. Lipinski would have been required to execute, deliver and not revoke a general release of claims and abide by restrictive covenants as detailed below.benefits. If Mr. Lipinski's employment was terminated at any time by reason of his death, then in addition to any Accrued Amounts, Mr. Lipinski's beneficiary (or his estate) would have been paid the base salary Mr. Lipinski would

have received had he remained employed through the Lipinski Post-Employment Period, and a pro-rata bonus for the year in which termination occurs based on actual results. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CVR Energy may, at its option, purchase insurance to cover the obligations with respect to either Mr. Lipinski's supplemental disability payments or the payments due to Mr. Lipinski's beneficiary or estate by reason of his death. Mr. Lipinski would be required to cooperate in obtaining such insurance. Mr. Lipinski does not receive any payments or benefits in the event of retirement.
If any payments or distributions due to Mr. Lipinski would be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, then such payments or distributions will be "cut back" only if that reduction would be more beneficial to him on an after-tax basis than if there was no reduction. The estimated total amounts payable to Mr. Lipinski (or his beneficiary or estate in the event of death) in the event of termination of employment under the circumstances described above are set forth in the table below. Mr. Lipinski would solely be entitled to Accrued Amounts, if any, upon the termination of employment by CVR Energy for cause, or by him voluntarily without good reason. The agreement required Mr. Lipinski to abide by a perpetual restrictive covenant relating to non-disclosure and non-disparagement. The agreement also included covenants relating to non-solicitation and non-competition during Mr. Lipinski's employment term, and thereafter during the period he receives severance payments or supplemental disability payments, as applicable, or for six months following the end of the term (if no severance or disability payments are payable).
David L. Lamp.     If Mr. Lamp'sLamp’s employment is terminated either by CVR Energy without cause and other than for disability or by Mr. Lamp for good reason (as these terms are defined in his employment agreement), then in addition to any Accrued Amounts, Mr. Lamp is entitled to receive as severance: (i) salary continuation for the lesser of six months and the remainder of the term of the employment agreement (such period, the "Lamp Post-Employment Period"); and (ii) a pro-rata bonus for the year in which termination occurs based on actual results. In addition, if Mr. Lamp's employment is terminated either by CVR Energy without cause and other than for disability or by Mr. Lamp for good reason (as these terms are defined in his employment agreement) within the one year following a change in control (as defined in his employment agreement) or in specified circumstances prior to and in connection with a change in control, Mr. Lamp will receive the Incentive Payment within 30 days following the consummation of the change in control.
If Mr. Lamp's employment is terminated as a result of his disability, then in addition to any Accrued Amounts andLamp does not receive any payments to be made to Mr. Lamp under disability plan(s), Mr. Lamp is entitled to disability payments during the Lamp Post-Employment Period equal to the base rate of Mr. Lamp's base salary as in effect immediately before his disability (the estimated total amount of this payment is set forthor benefits in the relevant table below) and a pro-rata bonus for the year in which termination occurs based on actual results.event of retirement other than benefits accrued prior to such termination. As a condition to receiving these severance payments and benefits, Mr. Lamp must execute, deliver and not revoke a general release of claims and abide by restrictive covenants as detailed below. If Mr. Lamp's employment is terminated at any time by reason of his death, then in addition to any Accrued Amounts, Mr. Lamp's beneficiary (or his estate) will be paid the base salary Mr. Lamp would have received had he remained employed through the Lamp Post-Employment Period, and a pro-rata bonus for the year in which termination occurs based on actual results. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CVR Energy may, at its option, purchase insurance to cover the obligations with respect to either Mr. Lamp's supplemental disability payments or the payments due to Mr. Lamp's beneficiary or estate by reason of his death. Mr. Lamp would be required to cooperate in obtaining such insurance. Mr. Lamp does not receive any payments or benefits in the event of retirement.
If any payments or distributions due to Mr. Lamp would be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, then such payments or distributions will be "cut back" only if that reduction would be more beneficial to him on an after-tax basis than if there was no reduction. The estimated total amounts payable to Mr. Lamp (or his beneficiary or estate in the event of death) in the event of termination of employment under the circumstances described above are set forth in the table below. Mr. Lamp would solely be entitled to Accrued Amounts, if any, upon the termination of employment by CVR Energy for cause, or by him voluntarily without good reason. The agreement requires Mr. Lamp to abide by a perpetual restrictive covenant relating to non-disclosure and non-disparagement. The agreement also includes covenants relating to non-solicitation and non-competition during Mr. Lamp'sLamp’s employment term, and thereafter during the period he receives severance payments or supplemental disability payments, as applicable, or for six months following the end of the term (if no severance or disability payments are payable).
Mark A. Pytosh., as well as a perpetual restrictive covenant relating to non-disclosure and non-disparagement and covenants relating to non-solicitation and noncompetition. If the employment of Mr. Pytosh was terminated either by our general partner without cause and other than for disability or by Mr. Pytosh for good reason (as such terms are defined in his employment agreements), then Mr. Pytosh would have been entitled, in addition to any Accrued Amounts, to receive as severance (i) salary continuation for the lesser of six months or the remainder of the term of the agreement, (ii) a pro-rata bonus for the year in which termination occurs based on actual results and (iii) subject to his timely election, and the availability thereof, continuation coverage under our general partner's group health plan as provided under Part 6 of Title I of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (as amended) and Section 4980B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended) (collectively, "COBRA") for the applicable continuation period under COBRA.

As a condition to receiving these severance payments and benefits, Mr. Pytosh would have been required to (i) execute, deliver and not revoke a general release of claims and (ii) abide by restrictive covenants as detailed below. The agreement provided that if any payments or distributions due to Mr. PytoshLamp under his employment agreement would be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, then such payments or distributions will be cut back“cut back” only if that reduction would be more beneficial to the executive officerhim on an after-tax basis than if there werewas no reduction.  Mr.

Other Named Executive Officers. Mses. Jackson and Buhrig and Messrs. Pytosh, would solely beand Bley do not have employment agreements. However, under the CVI Severance Plan, Mses. Jackson and Buhrig and Messrs. Pytosh and Bley are generally eligible for certain payments in the event of their involuntary termination (other than for cause, as defined in the CVI Severance Plan) or their resignation for good reason (as defined in the CVI Severance Plan), in each case, within the 120 days preceding or the 24 months following a change in control (as defined in the CVI Severance Plan) including any amounts accrued prior to termination, plus a lump sum payment equal to twelve months of base salary plus the average annual bonus paid during the preceding three years (or target in the event of no bonus history). They are also entitled to Accrued Amounts, if any, uponacceleration of unvested equity awards. These payouts are subject to various conditions including the terminationexecution of employment by our general partner for cause, or by Mr. Pytosh voluntarily without good reason. Thea release agreement, required Mr. Pytosh to abide by a perpetual restrictive covenant relating to non-disclosure and non-disparagement. The agreement also includednon-disparagement and covenants relating to non-solicitation and covenants relatingnon-competition for a period of 12 months.

The amounts of potential post-employment payments and benefits in the table below assume that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2020. Pursuant to non-competition during the employment term andCorporate MSA, we are responsible for six months following the endpayment of our proportionate share of the term.
Susan M. Ball, John R. Walter and William White.    Ms. Ball and Messrs. Walter and White do not have employment agreements and are not entitled to any severance“CVI Severance Plan” and other benefits from CVR Energy or our general partnercosts following the termination of their employment.
 Cash Severance ($) Benefit Continuation ($)(3)
 Death Disability Retirement 
Termination without
Cause or
with Good Reason
 Death Disability Retirement 
Termination without
Cause or
with Good Reason
       (1) (2)       (1) (2)
John J. Lipinski(4)2,500,000
 2,500,000
 
 2,500,000
 2,500,000
 
 
 
 
 
David L. Lamp500,000
 500,000
 
 500,000
 10,500,000
 
 
 
 
 
Mark A. Pytosh
 
 
 708,750
 708,750
 
 
 
 
 

(1)Severance payments and benefits in the eventemployment of termination without cause or resignation for good reason not in connection with a change in control.
(2)Severance payments and benefits in the event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a change in control.
(3)Beginning in 2014, CVR Energy switched to a self-insured medical plan, and premiums for the named executive officers are paid by the employee only.
(4)The table above shows the payment of Mr. Lipinski's bonus at target under the described circumstances. Mr. Lipinski retired December 31, 2017 concurrent with the expiration of his employment agreement. Under the terms of his employment agreement following expiration, he received his actual earned bonus for 2017, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of $3,460,500.
Each of the named executive officers of our general partner who isthat are employed by CVR Energy (exceptServices.
December 31, 2020 | 95


Cash SeveranceBenefit Continuation
DeathDisabilityRetirementTermination without Cause or with Good Reason (4)DeathDisabilityRetirementTermination without Cause or with Good Reason (4)
(1)(2)(1)(2)
David L. Lamp (3)$693,101 $693,101 $193,101 $693,101 $10,000,000 $— $— $— $— $— 
Mark A. Pytosh— — — — 1,608,132 — — — — — 
Tracy D. Jackson— — — — 1,035,010 — — — — — 
Melissa M. Buhrig— — — — 1,183,875 — — — — — 
Matthew W. Bley— — — — 463,402 — — — — — 

(1)Severance payments and benefits in the event of termination without cause or resignation for Messrs. Lipinskigood reason not in connection with a change in control.
(2)Severance payments and Lamp)benefits in the event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a change in control.
(3)For Mr. Lamp, payments upon (a) death, disability, or termination without cause or resignation for good reason not in connection with a change in control include: (i) base salary payable for six months under his employment agreement, plus (ii) a pro-rata bonus under the applicable bonus plan based on actual achievement, plus (iii) Accrued Amounts (as defined in his employment agreement), and (b) termination without cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a change in control includes payout of the incentive payment set forth under his employment agreement.
(4)For all named executive officers other than Mr. Lamp, payments in the termination without cause or with good reason column include, under the CVI Severance Plan, a lump sum of twelve months’ base pay plus the average of the preceding three years’ annual bonus (or current target in the absence of three-year bonus history).

Certain of our named executive officers have received incentive unit awards under the CVI LTIP, as well as Mr. Pytosh, who is employed by our general partner, has been granted incentive units byphantom unit awards under the CVR Energy.
In December 2015, 2016 and 2017, CVR Energy granted Mr. Pytosh, Ms. Ball and Mr. Walter awards consistingPartners LTIP, each of incentive units and distribution equivalent rights. Each incentive unit and distribution equivalent rightwhich generally represents the right to receive, upon vesting, a cash payment equal to (i) the number of units times the average fair market valueclosing price of onea common share of CVR Energy or a common unit of CVR Refining's common unitsPartnership for the ten trading days preceding vesting, plus (ii) the per unit cash value of all dividends declared and paid by CVR Energy or distributions declared and paid by CVR Refiningthe Partnership, as applicable, from the grant date to and including the vesting date. TheThese awards generally provide for acceleration upon certain termination events, as follows:
If the incentive units or phantom units, as applicable, are subject to transfer restrictions and vesting requirements that lapse in one-third annual increments on each annual vesting date, subject to immediate vesting under certain circumstances. With respect to the 2015 award for Ms. Ball, the award becomes immediately vested in the event of any of the following: (i) such named executive officer's employment is terminated other than for cause within the one-year period following a change in control; (ii)cancelled or if such named executive officer resigns from employment for good reason within the one year period following a change in control; or (iii) such named executive officer's employment is terminated under certain circumstances prior to a change in control. If (A) Mr. Pytosh, Ms. Ball or Mr. Walter(a) is terminated other than for cause or (B) with respect to Mr. Pytosh (with respect to the 2015-2016 award agreements) or Ms. Ball (with respect to the 2015 award agreement), such named executive officer resigns for good reason in the absence of a change in control, or (C) if such named executive officer's employment(b) is terminated due to death or disability, then the portion of the award scheduled to vest in the year in which such event occurs becomes immediately vested and the remaining portion is forfeited.
In December 2016, CVR Energy granted Mr. Lipinski an award of 3,500 performance units. The award represents the right to receive a cash payment equal to $1,000 multiplied by the applicable performance factor. The performance factor If such named executive officer is determined based on the level of attainment of the applicable performance objective, set forth as a percentage, which may range from 0-110%. Seventy-five percent of the performance units attributable to the award are subject to a performance objective

relating to the average barrels per day crude throughput during the performance cycle, and 25% of the performance units attributable to the award are subject to a performance objective relating to the average gathered crude barrels per day during the performance cycle. The performance objectives are set in accordance with approved levels of the business plan for the fiscal year during the performance cycle and therefore are considered reasonably possible of being achieved. The amount paid pursuant to the award, if any, will be paid following the end of the performance cycle for the award, but no later than March 6, 2018. The award is subject to transfer restrictions and carries a performance cycle ending on December 31, 2017. In the event of Mr. Lipinski’s termination of employment prior to the applicable payment date by reason of Mr. Lipinski’s death or disability, all performance units with respect to which a payment date has not yet occurred will remain outstanding, and amounts due to Mr. Lipinski, if any, with respect to such performance units will be paid in the ordinary course as if his employment had not terminated based on actual results. In the event prior to the applicable payment date Mr. Lipinski's employment is terminated by CVR Energy other than for cause or by reason of Mr. Lipinski’s resignationresigns for good reason a pro rata portion of the performance unitsin connection with respect to which a payment date has not yet occurred will remain outstanding, and amounts due to Mr. Lipinski, if any, with respect to such performance units will be paid in the ordinary course as if his employment had not terminated based on actual results. In the event that Mr. Lipinski’s employment terminates for any other reason prior to the dates set forth above, all performance units with respect to which a payment date has not yet occurred will be forfeited immediately.
In November 2017, CVR Energy granted Mr. Lamp an award of 1,500 performance units. The award represents the right to receive a cash payment equal to $1,000 multiplied by the applicable performance factor. The performance factor is determined based on the level of attainment of the applicable performance objective, and both the performance factor and performance objective(s) will be determined by CVR Energy's compensation committee. The amount paid pursuant to the award, if any, will be paid following the end of the performance cycle for the award, but no later than March 6, 2019. The award is subject to transfer restrictions and carries a performance cycle commencing January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2018. In the event of Mr. Lamp's termination of employment prior to the applicable payment date by reason of Mr. Lamp's death or disability, all performance units with respect to which a payment date has not yet occurred will remain outstanding, and amounts due to Mr. Lamp, if any, with respect to such performance units will be paid in the ordinary course as if his employment had not terminated based on actual results. In the event prior to the applicable payment date Mr. Lamp's employment is terminated by CVR Energy other than for cause or by reason of Mr. Lamp's resignation for good reason, a pro rata portion of the performance units with respect to which a payment date has not yet occurred will remain outstanding, and amounts due to Mr. Lamp, if any, with respect to such performance units will be paid in the ordinary course as if his employment had not terminated based on actual results. In the event that Mr. Lamp's employment terminates for any other reason prior to the dates set forth above, all performance units with respect to which a payment date has not yet occurred will be forfeited immediately.
In November 2017, CVR Energy also entered into the PU Award Agreement in which Mr. Lamp was granted performance units with a cash value equal to the Incentive Payment. In addition to the change in control trigger described above, the award will vest and the Incentive Payment will become payable if the average closing price of CVR Energy’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange over the 30-day trading period from January 4, 2022 to February 15, 2022 is equal to or greater than $60 per share. The award will be immediately forfeited and terminated if the foregoing vesting condition is not satisfied, or if at any time, on or prior to December 31, 2021, Mr. Lamp’s employment with CVR Energy is terminated for any or no reason, a change in control occurs, or the board approves a transaction, which, if consummated, would constitute a change in control. For the avoidance of doubt, Mr. Lamp will not under any circumstance be entitled to receive more than one Incentive Payment and if he becomes entitled to the Incentive Payment under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Lamp will immediately forfeit any right to payments under the PU Award Agreement.all unvested awards accelerate.

The following table reflects the value of accelerated vesting of the unvested incentive units and phantom units, as applicable, held by the named executive officers assuming the triggering event took place on December 31, 2017.2020. For the purposes of the December 2015 incentive unit award,phantom units awarded, the value is based on the 10-day20-day average closing price of CVR Refiningfor the Partnership common units for the 1020 trading days preceding December 31, 2017,2020, or $14.96 per unit plus accrued distributions of $0.94$13.80 per unit. The table does not take into considerationFor the purposes of the incentive units awarded in December 2020, the value ofis based on the performance units held by Mr. Lipinski (which is20-day average closing price for the only award held by Mr. Lipinski) since such performance units would not accelerate, but instead pay out in the ordinary course as if his employment had not terminated. The table also does not take into consideration the value of the performance units held by Mr. Lamp, since the performance cycle does not commence until January 1, 2018. Messrs. Pytosh and Walter do not have any awards from CVR Energy that qualifycommon stock for acceleration in the event of their termination as of20-trading days preceding December 31, 2017.2020, or $15.19 per share.

Value of Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock Unit and Incentive Unit Awards

 DeathDisabilityRetirementTermination without Cause or with Good Reason
    (1)(2)
David L. Lamp$— $— $— $— $2,652,646 
Mark A. Pytosh— — — — 2,359,964 
Tracy D. Jackson— — — — 987,725 
Melissa M. Buhrig— — — — 1,127,131 
Matthew W. Bley— — — — 304,955 

 Death ($) Disability ($) Retirement ($) 
Termination without
Cause or
with Good Reason ($)
       (1) (2)
Susan M. Ball
 
 
 
 245,035

(1)Termination without cause or resignation for good reason not in connection with a change in control.
(1)Termination without cause or resignation for good reason not in connection with a change in control.
(2)Termination without cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a change in control.
(2)Termination without cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a change in control.

Mr. Pytosh and Mr. White have been granted phantom units pursuant to the CVR Partners LTIP.
In December 2015, 2016 and 2017, CVR Partners granted Mr. Pytosh and Mr. White awards consisting of phantom units and distribution equivalent rights. Each phantom unit and distribution equivalent right represents the right to receive, upon vesting, a cash payment equal to (i) the average fair market value of one unit of the CVR Partners' common units for the ten trading days preceding vesting, plus (ii) the per unit cash value of all distributions declared and paid by CVR Partners from the grant date to and including the vesting date. The awards are subject to transfer restrictions and vesting requirements that lapse in one-third annual increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to immediate vesting under certain circumstances. If Mr. Pytosh or Mr. White is terminated other than for cause or if Mr. Pytosh, with respect to the 2015 and 2016 awards, resigns for good reason, or if their respective employment is terminated due to death or disability, then the portion of the award scheduled to vest in the year in which such event occurs becomes immediately vested and the remaining portion is forfeited.
Messrs. Pytosh and White do not have any awards from CVR Partners that qualify for acceleration in the event of their termination as of December 31, 2017.2020 | 96



Pay Ratio


Pursuant to a mandateFor 2020, we conducted separate comparisons of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the SEC adopted a rule requiringmedian employee’s total annual disclosure of the ratio ofcompensation to the total annual compensation of the Partnership'seach of our Principal Executive Officer ("PEO"Officers (“PEOs”) to the median employee's annual total compensation. For 2017, we had two PEOs and, therefore, we are presenting two separate pay ratios. We calculated the first ratio using: Mr. Pytosh who serves as Chief Executive Officer and President ofLamp, our general partner. We calculated the second ratio using Mr. Lipinski who served as Executive Chairman, and a director ofMr. Pytosh, our general partner until his retirement on December 31, 2017. Set forth below for 2017 is a comparison of (i) the median of the annual total compensation of all our employeesPresident and our consolidated subsidiaries (except our PEOs) and (ii) the annual total compensation of each of our PEOs (as adjusted to reflect the compensation attributable to their respective service to the Partnership). The median of the annual total compensation and the pay ratio described below are reasonable estimates calculated by the Partnership in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.Chief Executive Officer.

We estimate that the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees and our consolidated subsidiaries (except our PEOs) was $112,656$126,523 for 2017.2020. The annual total compensation of Messrs. Pytosh and Lipinski,Lamp, our PEOs for 2017,2020, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Item 11, was $1,362,461$2,011,144 and $674,880,$316,481, respectively, for 20172020 (as adjusted to reflect the compensation attributable to their respective service to the Partnership). These totals and the pay ratios described below are reasonable estimates calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

Based on this information, we estimate that the ratio of the annual total compensation of each of our PEOs to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees for 20172020 was: (i) 1216 to 1, with respect to Mr. Pytosh; and (ii) 63 to 1, with respect to Mr. Lipinski.Lamp.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our PEOs, we used the following methodology and made the following material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates:
1.    For 2017, we calculated these ratios using Messrs. Pytosh and Lipinski as our PEOs. Mr. Pytosh serves as Chief Executive Officer and President of our general partner. Mr. Lipinski served as Executive Chairman and a director of our general partner until his retirement on December 31, 2017. Mr. Lamp succeeded Mr. Lipinski and was appointed as co-Executive Chairman of our general partner on December 1, 2017 and joined the board of directors of our general partner effective January 1, 2018. We calculated the pay ratio for 2017 using Mr. Lipinski as our second PEO, rather than Mr. Lamp, because Mr. Lipinski served in this capacity for the entirety of 2017 while Mr. Lamp served in this capacity for only one month.

2.    (1)We determined that, as of December 31, 2017,2020, the employee population of the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries consisted of 304 individuals.314 individuals, not including Messrs. Pytosh and Lamp which are employed by CVR Services.
3.    (2)To identify the "median employee"“median employee” from the employee population, we compared the amount of annual total compensation of such employees for 20172020 determined in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, which consisted of salary, bonus, non-equity incentive plan compensation and other compensation. We "annualized"“annualized” the compensation of our full-time and part-time permanent employees as of December 31, 20172020 to adjust for the portion of the year that the employee did not work, if applicable. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the "median“median employee."
4.    (3)Once we identified our median employee, we included the elements of such employee'semployee’s compensation for 20172020 determined in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $112,656.$126,523. With respect to the annual total compensation of our PEOs, we used the amounts reported in the "Total"“Total” column of our 20172020 Summary Compensation Table included in this Item 11, which was calculated in accordance with the same requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, as adjusted to reflect the portion of such amount attributable to our PEOs respective service to the Partnership as further described in the table immediately following our 20172020 Summary Compensation Table.

Compensation of Directors

Directors of our general partnerGeneral Partner who are not officers, employees, or directors of CVR Energy or its affiliates receive compensation for their services. This compensation is designed to attract and retain nationally recognized, highly qualified directors to lead the Partnership and to be demonstrably fair to both the Partnership and such directors, taking into consideration, among other things, the time commitments required for service on the Board and its committees.

In December 2019, the Board considered these goals and the compensation paid to such directors for 2019, and upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, elected to keep such compensation for 2020 the same as 2019. During 2017,2020, independent directors received an annual director fee of $55,000.$35,000. The audit committeeAudit Committee chair received an additional fee of $15,000 per year, while independent directors serving on the audit committeeAudit Committee received an additional fee of $7,500 per year. The compensation committeeCompensation Committee chair received an additional fee of $8,000 per year, while independent directors serving on the compensation committeeCompensation Committee received an additional fee of $5,000 per year. The chair of the environmental, health and safety committeeEH&S Committee received an additional fee of $8,000 per year, while independent directors serving on the environmental, health and safety committeeEH&S Committee received an additional fee of $5,000 per year. In addition, independent directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of the board of directors (and committees thereof) of our general partner and for other director-related education expenses. Each member of the Committee is eligible to receive an additional $1,500 per meeting for all meetings in excess of the following threshold:
December 31, 2020 | 97


Board/Committee MeetingThreshold Per Year
Board6
Audit Committee12
Compensation Committee6
EH&S Committee6

The following table sets forth the compensation earned by or paid to each independent director of our general partnerGeneral Partner who are not officers, employees, or directors of CVR Energy or its affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash (1)Unit AwardsTotal Compensation
Donna R. Ecton$56,085 $— $56,085 
Frank M. Muller, Jr. 55,500 — 55,500 
Peter K. Shea52,832 — 52,832 
Name
Fees Earned or Paid in
Cash(1)($)
 Unit Awards($) Total Compensation ($)
Donna R. Ecton75,000 
 75,000
Frank M. Muller, Jr. 75,500 
 75,500
Peter K. Shea70,500 
 70,500
Eric D. Karp13,750 
 13,750

(1)Amounts reflected in this column include annual retainer fees and additional fees for service as committee members, including the chair positions during 2017.

(1)Amounts reflected in this column include annual retainer fees, additional fees for service as committee members, including the chair positions, and reimbursements for out-of -pocket expenses during 2020.

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Unitholder Matters

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table presents information regarding beneficial ownership of our common units as of February 15, 201822, 2021 by:
our general partner;
each of our general partner'spartner’s directors;
each of our named executive officers;
each unitholder known by us to beneficially hold five percent or more of our outstanding units; and
all of our general partner'spartner’s executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Unless indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all common units beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. The business address for each of our beneficial owners is c/o CVR Partners, LP, 2277 Plaza Drive, Suite 500, Sugar Land, Texas 77479.
 
Common Units
Beneficially Owned
Name of Beneficial OwnerNumber Percent
CVR GP, LLC(1)
 
Coffeyville Resources, LLC(2)38,920,000
 34.4%
Raging Capital Management, LLC(3)9,572,033
 8.4%
GSO Capital Partners LP(4)6,269,716
 5.5%
David L. Lamp
 
John J. Lipinski(5)187,500
 *
Mark A. Pytosh(6)75,932
 *
Susan M. Ball1,800
 *
William White4,378
 *
John R. Walter
 
Donna R. Ecton(7)30,469
 *
Jonathan Frates
 
Andrew Langham
 
Frank M. Muller, Jr.(8)35,122
 *
Louis J. Pastor
 
Peter K. Shea586
 *
All directors and executive officers of our general partner as a group (12 persons)(9)148,287
 *

*Less than 1%
December 31, 2020 | 98


Common Units
Beneficially Owned (1)
Name of Beneficial OwnerNumberPercent
CVR Services, LLC (2)3,892,000 36.4 %
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (3)1,064,951 9.6 %
Barclays Bank Plc (4)910,460 8.2 %
CVR GP, LLC (5)— — 
Donna R. Ecton1,250 *
Jonathan Frates— — 
Hunter C. Gary— — 
David L. Lamp— — 
Andrew Langham— — 
Frank M. Muller, Jr.3,512 *
Mark A. Pytosh20,593 *
Peter K. Shea59 *
Matthew W. Bley— — 
Melissa M. Buhrig— — 
Tracy D. Jackson— — 
All directors and executive officers of our general partner as a group (11 persons) (6)25,414 *

(1)CVR GP, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CRLLC, is our general partner and manages and operates CVR Partners and has a non-economic general partner interest.
(2)CRLLC is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Energy.
*Less than 1%
(1)Numbers in this column reflect common unit ownership following the Partnership’s November 23, 2020 reverse unit split of the issued and outstanding common units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership, whereby each 10 outstanding common units were combined, converted, and changed into one common unit.
(2)CVR Services is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Energy, with an address at 2277 Plaza Drive, Suite 500, Sugar Land, TX 77479. CVR Energy may be deemed to have direct beneficial ownership of the common units held by CRLLC by virtue of its control of CRLLC. The directors of CVR Energy are Carl C. Icahn, Bob. G. Alexander, SungHwan Cho, Jonathan Frates, David L. Lamp, Stephen Mongillo, Louis J. Pastor and James M. Strock.
(3)The following disclosures are based on a Schedule 13G dated February 14, 2018 made with the SEC by Raging Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Raging Capital"), and William C. Martin, a U.S. citizen. The principal business address for Raging Capital and Mr. Martin is Ten Princeton Avenue, P.O. Box 228, Rocky Hill, New Jersey 08553. Raging Capital is the Investment Manager of Raging Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a

Cayman Islands exempted company (“Raging Master”), in whose name the disclosed common units of CVR Partners are held. William C. Martin is the Chairman, Chief Investment Officer and Managing Member of Raging Capital. Raging Master has delegated to Raging Capital the sole authority to vote and dispose of the securities held by Raging Master pursuant to an Investment Management Agreement, dated November 9, 2012, as amended and restated on December 21, 2016 (the “IMA”). The IMA may be terminated by any party thereto effective at the close of business on the last day of any fiscal quarter by giving the other party not less than sixty-one days’ written notice. As a result, each of Raging Capital and William C. Martin may be deemed to beneficially own the common units held by Raging Master.CVR Services by virtue of its control of CVR Services. The directors of CVR Energy are Patricia A. Agnello, SungHwan Cho, Jaffrey A. Firestone, Jonathan Frates, Hunter C. Gary, David L. Lamp, Stephen Mongillo, and James M. Strock.
(4)The following disclosures are based on a Schedule 13D/A dated January 12, 2018 made with the SEC by certain funds and entities associated with GSO Capital Partners LP (the "GSO Entities"), certain executives of the GSO Entities (the "GSO Executives"), certain entities associated with Blackstone Holdings I L.P. (the "Blackstone Entities"), and Stephen A. Schwarzman, who is a United States citizen. According to the filings, the principal business address of each of the GSO Entities and GSO Executives is c/o GSO Capital Partners LP, 345 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10154. The principal business address of each of the Blackstone Entities and Mr. Schwarzman is c/o The Blackstone Group L.P., 345 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10154. As of January 11, 2018, GSO ADGM II Nitro Blocker LLC directly holds 2,824,081 common units and GSO Credit-A Partners LP directly holds 3,445,635 common units.
(5)Mr. Lipinski owns 62,500 common units directly. In addition, Mr. Lipinski may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of an additional 125,000 common units, which are owned by the 2011 Lipinski Exempt Family Trust, which are held in trust for the benefit of Mr. Lipinski's family. Mr. Lipinski's spouse is the trustee of the trust. Mr. Lipinski retired December 31, 2017. The information reported for Mr. Lipinski is based on information available to CVR Partners and may not reflect his current beneficial ownership.
(6)Mr. Pytosh purchased 50,000 common units in connection with CVR Partners' Initial Public Offering in April 2011. Mr. Pytosh was awarded 1,478 common units on June 1, 2011, 2,418 common units on December 30, 2011, and 816 common units on December 28, 2012 and 1,220 common units on December 27, 2013. These common units vested immediately. Mr. Pytosh purchased 20,000 common units in the open market in November 2016.
(7)Ms. Ecton purchased 12,500 common units in connection with CVR Partners' Initial Public Offering in April 2011. Ms. Ecton was awarded 14,655 phantom units in connection with the Initial Public Offering, subject to a six-month vesting period. Upon vesting in October 2011, the phantom units converted to 14,655 common units, with 4,412 common units being withheld for tax purposes, resulting in a net award of 10,243 common units. Ms. Ecton was also awarded 2,418 common units on December 30, 2011, with 728 common units being withheld for tax purposes, resulting in a net award of 1,690 common units. These common units vested immediately. Ms. Ecton was also awarded 816 common units on December 28, 2012 and 1,220 common units on December 27, 2013. These common units vested immediately. Ms. Ecton purchased 2,000 common units in the open market in March 2016, and an additional 2,000 common units in the open market in June 2017.
(8)Mr. Muller purchased 21,875 common units in connection with CVR Partners' Initial Public Offering in April 2011. Mr. Muller was awarded 8,793 phantom units in connection with the Initial Public Offering, subject to a six-month vesting period. Upon vesting in October 2011, the phantom units converted to 8,793 common units. Mr. Muller was also awarded 2,418 common units on December 30, 2011, 816 common units on December 28, 2012 and 1,220 common units on December 27, 2013. These common units vested immediately.
(9)
(3)Beneficial ownership information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2021 by Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. with an address of 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has shared voting power with respect to 1,064,951 units and shared dispositive power of 1,064,951 units.
(4) Beneficial ownership information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2021 by Barclays Plc with an address of 1 Churchill Place, London, X0 E14 5HP. Barclays Bank Plc has sole voting power with respect to 910,460 units and sole dispositive power with respect to 910,460 units.
(5) CVR GP, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Services, is our general partner and manages and operates CVR Partners and has a non-economic general partner interest with an address at 2277 Plaza Drive, Suite 500, Sugar Land, TX 77479.
(6) The number of common units owned by all of the directors and executive officers of our general partner, as a group, reflects the sum of (i) the 75,932 common units owned by Mr. Pytosh, the 1,800 common units owned by Ms. Ball and the 4,378 common units owned by Mr. White, (ii) the 30,469 common units owned by Ms. Ecton, (iii) the 35,122 common units owned by Mr. Muller, and (iv) the 586 owned by Mr. Shea. The number does not include common units held by Mr. Lipinski as he was not serving as a director or as an executive officer as of the specified date.
The executive officers and directors of our general partner, do not own any common stockas a group, reflects the sum of CVR Energy.
Equity Compensation Plan
In connection with(i) the Initial Public Offering, the board of directors of our general partner adopted the CVR Partners LTIP. Individuals who are eligible to receive awards under the CVR Partners LTIP include employees, officers, consultants and directors of CVR Partners and the general partner and their respective subsidiaries and parents. The CVR Partners LTIP provides for the grant of options, unit appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, restricted units, phantom units and other unit-based awards, each in respect of common units. A maximum of 5,000,00020,593 common units are issuable underowned by Mr. Pytosh, (ii) the CVR Partners LTIP.1,250 common units owned by Ms. Ecton, (iii) the 3,512 common units owned by Mr. Muller, and (iv) the 59 common units owned by Mr. Shea.


The table below contains information about securities authorized for issuance under the CVR Partners LTIP as of December 31, 2017. The CVR Partners LTIP was approved by the board of directors of our general partner in March 2011.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category
Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Vesting
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Securities
 
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:      
CVR Partners, LP Long- Term Incentive Plan
 
 4,820,215
(1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:
 
   
None      
Total
 
 4,820,215
 

(1)Represents units that remain available for future issuance pursuant to the CVR Partners LTIP in connection with awards of options, unit appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, restricted units and phantom units.

December 31, 2020 | 99


Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Coffeyville Resources, LLC ("CRLLC") a wholly-owned subsidiary of
CVR Energy,Services owns (i) 38,920,0003,892,000 common units, representing approximately 34%36% of our outstanding units, and (ii) our general partner with its non-economic general partner interest (which does not entitle it to receive distributions).

Agreements with CVR EnergyServices and Its Subsidiaries

CVR PartnersGP and the Partnership and its subsidiaries are party to, or otherwise subject to certain agreements with CVR EnergyServices and its subsidiaries, including CVR Refining and its subsidiary Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC ("CRRM"),CRRM, that govern the business relations among each party. TheseThe Partnership is party to the Limited Partnership Agreement, the Corporate MSA, and the Omnibus Agreement. Our Coffeyville Facility is party to the Coffeyville MSA, the Terminal and Operating Agreement, and the Environmental Agreement. Further, some of these agreements were not the result of arm's-lengtharm’s-length negotiations and the terms of these agreements are not necessarily at least as favorable to the parties to these agreements as terms which could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties. The agreements are described as in effect at December 31, 2017, unless otherwise noted.
Coke Supply Agreement
CRNF is partyRefer to a coke supply agreement with CRRM, pursuant to which CRRM supplies the Coffeyville Facility with pet coke. This agreement provides that CRRM must deliver to CRNF during each calendar year an annual required amount of pet coke equal to the lesser of (i) 100 percent of the pet coke produced at CRRM's Coffeyville, Kansas petroleum refinery or (ii) 500,000 tons of pet coke. CRNF is also obligated to purchase this annual required amount. If during a calendar month CRRM produces more than 41,667 tons of pet coke, then CRNF will have the option to purchase the excess at the purchase price provided for in the agreement. If CRNF declines to exercise this option, CRRM may sell the excess to a third party.
CRNF obtains most (over 70% on average during the last five years) of the pet coke it needs from CRRM's adjacent crude oil refinery pursuant to the pet coke supply agreement, and procures the remainder through a contract with HollyFrontier Corporation and on the open market. The price CRNF pays pursuant to the pet coke supply agreement is based on the lesser of a pet coke price derived from the price received for UAN (the "UAN-based price") or a pet coke price index. The UAN-based price begins with a pet coke price of $25 per ton based on a price per ton for UAN that excludes transportation cost ("netback price"Note 9 (“Related Party Transactions”) of $205 per ton, and adjusts up or down $0.50 per tonPart II, Item 8 for every $1.00 change in the netback price. The UAN-based price has a ceilingadditional information related to these agreements. Refer also to Part IV, Item 15 of $40 per ton and a floor of $5 per ton.
CRNF will pay any taxes associated with the sale, purchase, transportation, delivery, storage or consumption of the pet coke. CRNF is entitled to offset any amount payablethis Report for the pet coke against any amount due from CRRM under the feedstock and shared services agreement between the parties. If we fail to pay an invoice on time, we will pay interest on the outstanding amount payable at a rate of three percent above the prime rate.filed agreements.

The terms of the pet coke supply agreement provide benefits both to CRNF and CRRM's petroleum business. The cost of the pet coke supplied by CRRM to CRNF in most cases will be lower than the price which we otherwise would pay to third parties. The cost to us will be lower both because the actual price paid will be lower and because we will pay significantly reduced transportation costs (since the pet coke is supplied by an adjacent facility which will involve no freight or tariff costs). In addition, because the cost CRNF pays will be formulaically related to the price received for UAN (subject to a UAN based price floor and ceiling), we will enjoy lower pet coke costs during periods of lower revenues regardless of the prevailing pet coke market.
In return for CRRM receiving a potentially lower price for pet coke in periods when the pet coke price is impacted by lower UAN prices, it enjoys the following benefits associated with the disposition of a low value by-product of the refining process: avoiding the capital cost and operating expenses associated with handling pet coke; enjoying flexibility in its crude slate and operations as a result of not being required to meet a specific pet coke quality; and avoiding the administration, credit risk and marketing fees associated with selling pet coke.
The agreement has an initial term of 20 years, ending in 2027, which will be automatically extended for successive five- year renewal periods. Either party may terminate the agreement by giving notice no later than three years prior to a renewal date. The agreement is also terminable by mutual consent of the parties or if a party breaches the agreement and does not cure within applicable cure periods. Additionally, the agreement may be terminated in some circumstances if substantially all of the operations at the Coffeyville Facility or the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery are permanently terminated, or if either party is subject to a bankruptcy proceeding or otherwise becomes insolvent.
Either party may assign its rights and obligations under the agreement to an affiliate of the assigning party, to a party's lenders for collateral security purposes, or to an entity that acquires all or substantially all of the equity or assets of the assigning party related to the refinery or fertilizer plant, as applicable, in each case subject to applicable consent requirements.
The agreement contains an obligation to indemnify the other party and its affiliates against liability arising from breach of the agreement, negligence, or willful misconduct by the indemnifying party or its affiliates. The indemnification obligation will be reduced, as applicable, by amounts actually recovered by the indemnified party from third parties or insurance coverage. The agreement also contains a provision that prohibits recovery of lost profits or revenue, or special, incidental, exemplary, punitive or consequential damages, from either party or certain affiliates.
The cost of pet coke cost associated with the transfer of pet coke from CRRM to CRNF was approximately $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and included in cost of materials and other on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Payables of $0.1 million related to the coke supply agreement were included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017.
Feedstock and Shared Services Agreement
CRNF is party to a feedstock and shared services agreement with CRRM under which the two parties provide feedstock and other services to one another. These feedstocks and services are utilized in the respective production processes of CRRM's Coffeyville, Kansas refinery and CRNF's Coffeyville Facility. Feedstocks provided under the agreement include, among others, hydrogen, high-pressure steam, nitrogen, instrument air, oxygen and natural gas. The agreement was amended and restated effective January 1, 2017 and subsequently amended effective November 1, 2017.
CRNF transfers hydrogen to CRRM pursuant to the feedstock and shared services agreement. CRNF is not required to sell hydrogen to CRRM if such hydrogen is required for operation of CRNF's Coffeyville Facility, if such sale would adversely affect the Partnership's classification as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, or if such sale would not be in CRNF's best interest. The feedstock agreement provides pricing terms for sales of hydrogen by CRNF. Pricing for sales of hydrogen from CRNF to CRRM is based on ammonia prices for sales of hydrogen up to a designated amount. For sales of hydrogen in excess of such amount, the pricing reverts to a UAN pricing structure to make us whole, as if we had produced UAN for sale. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the gross sales generated from the sale of hydrogen to CRRM pursuant to the feedstock and shared services agreement were approximately $0.4 million, which is included in net sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The monthly hydrogen sales are cash settled net on a monthly basis with hydrogen purchases, pursuant to the hydrogen purchase and sale agreement below.
The agreement provides that both parties must deliver high-pressure steam to one another under certain circumstances. Net expenses recorded in direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) during the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $0.2 million related to high-pressure steam.
CRNF is also obligated to make available to CRRM any nitrogen produced by the Linde air separation plant that is not required for the operation of the Coffeyville Facility, as determined by us in a commercially reasonable manner. The price for

the nitrogen is based on a cost of $0.035 cents per kilowatt hour, as adjusted to reflect changes in our electric bill. There were no reimbursed direct operating expenses associated with nitrogen for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The agreement also provides that both CRNF and CRRM must deliver instrument air to one another in some circumstances. CRNF must make instrument air available for purchase by CRRM at a minimum flow rate, to the extent produced by the Linde air separation plant and available to us. The price for such instrument air is $18,000 per month, prorated according to the number of days of use per month, subject to certain adjustments, including adjustments to reflect changes in our electric bill. To the extent that instrument air is not available from the Linde air separation plant and is available from CRRM, CRRM is required to make instrument air available to CRNF for purchase at a price of $18,000 per month, prorated according to the number of days of use per month, subject to certain adjustments, including adjustments to reflect changes in CRRM's electric bill. There was no reimbursed direct operating expense or paid amounts for the year ended December 31, 2017.
CRNF is obligated to provide oxygen produced by the Linde air separation plant and made available to it to the extent that such oxygen is not required for operation of the Coffeyville Facility. The oxygen is required to meet certain specifications. Approximately $0.1 million was reimbursed by CRRM for the sale of oxygen for the year ended December 31, 2017 and was included as a reduction to direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization).
Prior to November 1, 2017, the feedstock and shared services agreement provided a mechanism pursuant to which CRNF transferred a tail gas stream to CRRM. Net sales generated from the sale of tail gas to CRRM were nominal during the year ended December 31, 2017. In April 2011, CRRM installed a pipe between the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery and the Coffeyville Facility to transfer the tail gas. CRNF paid CRRM the cost of installing the pipe and provided an additional 15% to cover the cost of capital, which was due from CRNF to CRRM over four years.
Effective November 1, 2017, the feedstock and shared services agreement was amended to provide a mechanism to transfer a natural gas stream from CRRM to CRNF, and CRNF will no longer transfer tail gas to CRRM. The pipe previously used for the transfer of tail gas was altered to exclusively allow for the transportation of natural gas. CRRM will nominate and purchase natural gas transportation and natural gas supplies for CRNF. CRNF will reimburse CRRM for the commodity cost of the natural gas and will pay a nominal fee for transportation and maintenance. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership recognized $0.6 million loss to write-off the tail gas asset in other income (expense) on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
CRNF also occasionally provides finished product tank capacity to CRRM under the agreement. There was no reimbursed direct operating expense for the use of tank capacity for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The agreement also addresses the allocation of various other feedstocks, services and related costs between the parties. Sour water, water for use in fire emergencies, tank storage, costs associated with security services and costs associated with the removal of excess sulfur are all allocated between the two parties by the terms of the agreement. The agreement also requires CRNF to reimburse CRRM for utility costs related to a sulfur processing agreement between Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. ("Tessenderlo Kerley") and CRRM. We have a similar agreement with Tessenderlo Kerley. Otherwise, costs relating to both CRNF's and CRRM's existing agreements with Tessenderlo Kerley are allocated equally between the two parties except in certain circumstances.
The parties may temporarily suspend the provision of feedstocks or services pursuant to the terms of the agreement if repairs or maintenance are necessary on applicable facilities. Additionally, the agreement imposes minimum insurance requirements on the parties and their affiliates.
At December 31, 2017, receivables of $0.2 million were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for amounts yet to be received related to components of the feedstock and shared services agreement. At December 31, 2017, current obligations of approximately $1.0 million were included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets associated with unpaid balances related to components of the feedstock and shared services agreement.
The agreement has an initial term of 20 years, ending in 2031, which will be automatically extended for successive five-year renewal periods. Either party may terminate the agreement, effective upon the last day of a term, by giving notice no later than three years prior to a renewal date. The agreement will also be terminable by mutual consent of the parties or if one party breaches the agreement and does not cure within applicable cure periods and the breach materially and adversely affects the ability of the terminating party to operate its facility. Additionally, the agreement may be terminated in some circumstances if substantially all of the operations at the Coffeyville Facility or the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery are permanently terminated, or if either party is subject to a bankruptcy proceeding or otherwise becomes insolvent. Either party is entitled to assign its rights and obligations under the agreement to an affiliate of the assigning party, to a party's lenders for collateral security purposes, or to an entity that acquires all or substantially all of the equity or assets of the assigning party related to the refinery or fertilizer

plant, as applicable, in each case subject to applicable consent requirements. The agreement contains an obligation to indemnify the other party and its affiliates against liability arising from breach of the agreement, negligence, or willful misconduct by the indemnifying party or its affiliates. The indemnification obligation will be reduced, as applicable, by amounts actually recovered by the indemnified party from third parties or insurance coverage. The agreement also contains a provision that prohibits recovery of lost profits or revenue, or special, incidental, exemplary, punitive or consequential damages, from either party or certain affiliates.
Hydrogen Purchase and Sale Agreement
CRNF and CRRM entered into a hydrogen purchase and sale agreement effective on January 1, 2017, pursuant to which CRRM agrees to sell and deliver a committed hydrogen volume of 90,000 mscf per month, and CRNF agrees to purchase and receive the committed volume. The committed volume pricing is based on a monthly fixed fee (based on the fixed and capital charges associated with producing the committed volume) and a monthly variable fee (based on the natural gas price associated with hydrogen actually received). In the event CRNF fails to take delivery of the full committed volume in a month, CRNF remains obligated to pay CRRM for the monthly fixed fee and the monthly variable fee based upon the actual hydrogen volume received, if any. In the event CRRM fails to deliver any portion of the committed volume for the applicable month for any reason other than planned repairs and maintenance, CRNF will be entitled to a pro-rata reduction of the monthly fixed fee. CRNF also has the option to purchase excess volume of up to 60,000 mscf per month, or more upon mutual agreement, from CRRM, if available for purchase.
A portion of the monthly variable fee, as defined in the terms of the agreement, is determined according to the natural gas costs incurred by CRRM in operation of the hydrogen plant, which will reflect market-driven changes in the natural gas prices. In addition, certain fixed fees will be adjusted on an annual basis according to the changes in a cost index, as defined in the terms of the agreement.
CRRM is not required to sell hydrogen to CRNF if such sale would adversely affect CVR Refining’s classification as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, and is not required to sell hydrogen to CRNF in excess of the committed volume if such volumes are needed for CRRM’s operations.
The agreement has an initial term of 20 years and will be automatically extended following the initial term for additional successive five-year renewal term unless either party gives 180 days written notice. Certain fees under the agreement are subject to modification after this initial term. The agreement contains customary terms related to indemnification, as well as termination for breach, by mutual consent, or due to insolvency or cessation of operations.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the cost of hydrogen purchases from CRRM was approximately $4.2 million, which was included in cost of materials and other in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The monthly hydrogen purchases are cash settled net on a monthly basis with hydrogen sales pursuant to the feedstock and shared services agreement. At December 31, 2017, current obligations, net of any amounts due to CRNF under the feedstock and shared services agreement for hydrogen, of approximately $0.3 million were included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets associated with net hydrogen purchases from CRRM.
Raw Water and Facilities Sharing Agreement
CRNF is party to a raw water and facilities sharing agreement with CRRM which (i) provides for the allocation of raw water resources between the Coffeyville refinery and our Coffeyville Facility and (ii) provides for the management of the water intake system (consisting primarily of a water intake structure, water pumps, meters, and a short run of piping between the intake structure and the origin of the separate pipes that transport the water to each facility) which draws raw water from the Verdigris River for both our Coffeyville Facility and CRRM's Coffeyville refinery. This agreement provides that a water management team consisting of one representative from each party to the agreement will manage the Verdigris River water intake system. The water intake system is owned and operated by CRRM. The agreement provides that both companies have an undivided one-half interest in the water rights that allow the water to be removed from the Verdigris River for use at our Coffeyville Facility and CRRM's Coffeyville refinery.
The agreement provides that both our Coffeyville Facility and the Coffeyville refinery are entitled to receive sufficient amounts of water from the Verdigris River each day to enable them to conduct their businesses at their appropriate operational levels. However, if the amount of water available from the Verdigris River is insufficient to satisfy the operational requirements of both facilities, then such water shall be allocated between the two facilities on a prorated basis. This prorated basis will be determined by calculating the percentage of water used by each facility over the two calendar years prior to the shortage, making appropriate adjustments for any operational outages involving either of the two facilities.
Costs associated with operation of the water intake system and administration of water rights are also allocated on a prorated basis, calculated by CRRM based on the percentage of water used by each facility during the calendar year in which

such costs are incurred. However, in certain circumstances, such as where one party bears direct responsibility for the modification or repair of the water pumps, one party will bear all costs associated with such activity. Additionally, CRNF must reimburse CRRM for electricity required to operate the water pumps on a prorated basis that is calculated monthly.
Either CRNF or CRRM is entitled to terminate the agreement by giving at least three years' prior written notice. Between the time that notice is given and the termination date, CRRM must cooperate with us to allow us to build our own water intake system on the Verdigris River to be used for supplying water to our Coffeyville Facility. CRRM is required to grant easements and access over its property so that we can construct and utilize such new water intake system, provided that no such easements or access over CRRM's property shall have a material adverse effect on its business or operations at the refinery. CRNF will bear all costs and expenses for such construction if we are the party that terminated the original water sharing agreement. If CRRM terminates the original water sharing agreement, we may either install a new water intake system at our own expense, or require CRRM to sell the existing water intake system to us for a price equal to the depreciated book value of the water intake system as of the date of transfer.
Either party may assign its rights and obligations under the agreement to an affiliate of the assigning party, to a party's lenders for collateral security purposes, or to an entity that acquires all or substantially all of the equity or assets of the assigning party related to the refinery or fertilizer plant, as applicable, in each case subject to applicable consent requirements. The parties may obtain injunctive relief to enforce their rights under the agreement. The agreement contains an obligation to indemnify the other party and its affiliates against liability arising from breach of the agreement, negligence, or willful misconduct by the indemnifying party or its affiliates. The indemnification obligation will be reduced, as applicable, by amounts actually recovered by the indemnified party from third parties or insurance coverage. The agreement also contains a provision that prohibits recovery of lost profits or revenue, or special, incidental, exemplary, punitive or consequential damages from either party or certain affiliates.
The term of the agreement is perpetual unless (i) the agreement is terminated by either party upon three years' prior written notice in the manner described above or (ii) the agreement is otherwise terminated by the mutual written consent of the parties.
Real Estate Transactions
Cross-Easement Agreement.  CRNF is party to a cross-easement agreement with CRRM so that both CRNF and CRRM can access and utilize each other's land in certain circumstances in order to operate their respective businesses. The agreement grants easements for the benefit of both parties and establishes easements for operational facilities, pipelines, equipment, access, and water rights, among other easements. The intent of the agreement is to structure easements that provide flexibility for both parties to develop their respective properties, without depriving either party of the benefits associated with the continuous reasonable use of the other party's property.
The agreement provides that facilities located on each party's property will generally be owned and maintained by the property-owning party; provided, however, that in certain specified cases where a facility that benefits one party is located on the other party's property, the benefited party will have the right to use, and will be responsible for operating and maintaining, the overlapping facility.
The easements granted under the agreement are non-exclusive to the extent that future grants of easements do not interfere with easements granted under the agreement. The duration of the easements granted under the agreement will vary, and some will be perpetual. Easements pertaining to certain facilities that are required to carry out the terms of our other agreements with CRRM will terminate upon the termination of such related agreements. CRNF has obtained a water rights easement from CRRM that is perpetual in duration. See "Raw Water and Facilities Sharing Agreement."
The agreement contains an obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other party against liability arising from negligence or willful misconduct by the indemnifying party. The agreement also requires the parties to carry minimum amounts of employer's liability insurance, commercial general liability insurance, and other types of insurance. If either party transfers its fee simple ownership interest in the real property governed by the agreement, the new owner of the real property will be deemed to have assumed all of the obligations of the transferring party under the agreement, except that the transferring party will retain liability for all obligations under the agreement which arose prior to the date of transfer.
Terminal and Operating Lease Agreement.  On May 4, 2012, CRNF entered into a lease and operating agreement with Coffeyville Resources Terminal, LLC ("CRT"), under which it leases the premises located at Phillipsburg, Kansas to be utilized as a UAN terminal. The initial term of the agreement will expire in May 2032, provided, however, that CRNF may terminate the lease at any time during the initial term by providing 180 days prior written notice. In addition, this agreement will automatically renew for successive five-year terms, provided that CRNF may terminate the agreement during any renewal term with at least 180 days written notice. CRNF will pay CRT $1.00 per year for rent, $4.00 per ton of UAN placed into the terminal and $4.00 per ton of UAN taken out of the terminal. For the year ended December 31, 2017, CVR Partners recognized approximately $0.1 million of cost of materials and other related to the terminal and operating lease agreement.

Lease Agreement.    CRNF is party to a lease agreement with CRRM in October 2007 under which CRNF leases certain office and laboratory space. The initial term of the lease was extended an additional year and will expire in October 2018, provided, however, that CRNF may terminate the lease at any time during the initial term by providing 180 days' prior written notice. In addition, CRNF has the option to renew the lease agreement for up to four additional one-year periods by providing CRRM with notice of renewal at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the then-existing term. For the year ended December 31, 2017, expenses incurred related to the use of the office and laboratory space totaled approximately $0.1 million. There were no amounts outstanding with respect to the lease agreement as of December 31, 2017.
Environmental Agreement
CRNF is a party to an environmental agreement with CRRM which provides for certain indemnification and access rights in connection with environmental matters affecting the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery and our Coffeyville Facility.
To the extent that one party's property experiences environmental contamination due to the activities of the other party and the contamination is known at the time the agreement was entered into, the contaminating party is required to implement all government-mandated environmental activities relating to the contamination, or else indemnify the property-owning party for expenses incurred in connection with implementing such measures.
To the extent that liability arises from environmental contamination that is caused by CRRM but is also commingled with environmental contamination caused by CRNF, CRRM may elect in its sole discretion and at its own cost and expense to perform government mandated environmental activities relating to such liability, subject to certain conditions and provided that CRRM will not waive any rights to indemnification or compensation otherwise provided for in the agreement.
The agreement also addresses situations in which a party's responsibility to implement such government-mandated environmental activities as described above may be hindered by the property-owning party's creation of capital improvements on the property. If a contaminating party bears such responsibility but the property-owning party desires to implement a planned and approved capital improvement project on its property, the parties must meet and attempt to develop a soil management plan together. If the parties are unable to agree on a soil management plan 30 days after receiving notice, the property-owning party may proceed with its own commercially reasonable soil management plan. The contaminating party is responsible for the costs of disposing of hazardous materials pursuant to such plan.
If the property-owning party needs to do work that is not a planned and approved capital improvement project but is necessary to protect the environment, health, or the integrity of the property, other procedures will be implemented. If the contaminating party still bears responsibility to implement government-mandated environmental activities relating to the property and the property-owning party discovers contamination caused by the other party during work on the capital improvement project, the property-owning party will give the contaminating party prompt notice after discovery of the contamination, and will allow the contaminating party to inspect the property. If the contaminating party accepts responsibility for the contamination, it may proceed with government-mandated environmental activities relating to the contamination, and it will be responsible for the costs of disposing of hazardous materials relating to the contamination. If the contaminating party does not accept responsibility for such contamination or fails to diligently proceed with government-mandated environmental activities related to the contamination, then the contaminating party must indemnify and reimburse the property-owning party upon the property-owning party's demand for costs and expenses incurred by the property-owning party in proceeding with such government-mandated environmental activities.
Either party is entitled to assign its rights and obligations under the agreement to an affiliate of the assigning party, to a party's lenders for collateral security purposes, or to an entity that acquires all or substantially all of the equity or assets of the assigning party related to the refinery or fertilizer plant, as applicable, in each case subject to applicable consent requirements. The agreement has a term of at least 20 years or for so long as the feedstock and shared services agreement is in force, whichever is longer. The agreement also contains a provision that prohibits recovery of lost profits or revenue, or special, incidental, exemplary, punitive or consequential damages, from either party or certain of its affiliates.
The agreement further provides for indemnification in the case of contamination or releases that occur subsequent to the execution of the agreement. If one party causes such contamination or release on the other party's property, the latter party must notify the contaminating party, and the contaminating party must take steps to implement all government-mandated environmental activities relating to the contamination, or else indemnify the property-owning party for the costs associated with doing such work.
The agreement also grants each party reasonable access to the other party's property for the purpose of carrying out obligations under the agreement. However, both parties must keep certain information relating to the environmental conditions on the properties confidential. Furthermore, both parties are prohibited from investigating soil or groundwater conditions except as required for government-mandated environmental activities, in responding to an accidental or sudden contamination of certain hazardous materials, or in connection with implementation of our comprehensive pet coke management plan.

The agreement provided for the development of a comprehensive pet coke management plan that established procedures for the management of pet coke and the identification of significant pet coke-related contamination. Also, the parties agreed to indemnify and defend one another and each other's affiliates against liabilities arising under the pet coke management plan or relating to a failure to comply with or implement the pet coke management plan.
Omnibus Agreement
We are party to an omnibus agreement with CVR Energy and our general partner, pursuant to which we have agreed that CVR Energy will have a preferential right to acquire any assets or group of assets that do not constitute assets used in a fertilizer restricted business. In determining whether to exercise any preferential right under the omnibus agreement, CVR Energy will be permitted to act in its sole discretion, without any fiduciary obligation to us or the unitholders whatsoever. These obligations will continue so long as CVR Energy owns at least 50% of our general partner.
Services Agreement
We obtain certain management and other services from CVR Energy pursuant to a services agreement between us, CVR GP and CVR Energy. Under this agreement, our general partner has engaged CVR Energy to provide us with certain services, including the following, among others:
services from CVR Energy's employees in capacities equivalent to the capacities of corporate executive officers except that those who serve in such capacities under the agreement will serve us on a shared, part-time basis only, unless we and CVR Energy agree otherwise;
administrative and professional services, including legal, accounting, SEC and securities exchange reporting, human resources, information technology, communications, insurance, tax, credit, finance, government and regulatory affairs;
recommendations on capital raising activities to the board of directors of our general partner, including the issuance of debt or equity interests, the entry into credit facilities and other capital market transactions;
managing or overseeing litigation and administrative or regulatory proceedings, establishing appropriate insurance policies for us, and providing safety and environmental advice;
recommending the payment of distributions; and
managing or providing advice for other projects, including acquisitions, as may be agreed by our general partner and CVR Energy from time to time.
As payment for services provided under the agreement, we, our general partner or our subsidiaries must pay CVR Energy (i) all costs incurred by CVR Energy or its affiliates in connection with the employment of its employees who provide the Partnership services under the agreement on a full-time basis, but excluding certain share-based compensation; (ii) a prorated share of costs incurred by CVR Energy or its affiliates in connection with the employment of its employees who provide the Partnership services under the agreement on a part-time basis, but excluding certain share-based compensation, and such prorated share shall be determined by CVR Energy on a commercially reasonable basis, based on the percentage of total working time that such shared personnel are engaged in performing services for the Partnership; (iii) a prorated share of certain administrative costs, including office costs, services by outside vendors, other sales, general and administrative costs and depreciation and amortization; and (iv) various other administrative costs in accordance with the terms of the agreement, including travel, insurance, legal and audit services, government and public relations and bank charges. We must pay CVR Energy within 15 days for invoices it submits under the agreement.
We and our general partner are not required to pay any compensation, salaries, bonuses or benefits to any of CVR Energy's employees who provide services to us or our general partner on a full-time or part-time basis; CVR Energy will continue to pay their compensation. However, personnel performing the actual day-to-day business and operations at the Coffeyville Facility or East Dubuque Facility level will be employed directly by us and our subsidiaries, and we or our subsidiaries will bear all personnel costs for these employees. We pay our allocated portion of performance units and incentive units issued by CVR Energy to those personnel providing services to the Partnership via the services agreement. The Partnership is not responsible for payment of the allocated share-based compensation for certain plans.
Either CVR Energy or our general partner may temporarily or permanently exclude any particular service from the scope of the agreement upon 180 days' notice. CVR Energy also has the right to delegate the performance of some or all of the services to be provided pursuant to the agreement to one of its affiliates or any other person or entity, though such delegation does not relieve CVR Energy from its obligations under the agreement. Either CVR Energy or our general partner may terminate the agreement upon at least 180 days' notice, but not more than one year's notice. Furthermore, our general partner

may terminate the agreement immediately if CVR Energy becomes bankrupt, dissolves or commences liquidation or winding-up procedures.
In order to facilitate the carrying out of services under the agreement, we and CVR Energy have granted one another certain royalty-free, non-exclusive and non-transferable rights to use one another's intellectual property under certain circumstances.
The agreement also contains an indemnity provision whereby we, our general partner, and our subsidiaries, as indemnifying parties, agree to indemnify CVR Energy and its affiliates (other than the indemnifying parties themselves) against losses and liabilities incurred in connection with the performance of services under the agreement or any breach of the agreement, unless such losses or liabilities arise from a breach of the agreement by CVR Energy or other misconduct on its part, as provided in the agreement. The agreement contains a provision stating that CVR Energy is an independent contractor under the agreement and nothing in the agreement may be construed to impose an implied or express fiduciary duty owed by CVR Energy, on the one hand, to the recipients of services under the agreement, on the other hand. The agreement prohibits recovery of lost profits or revenue, or special, incidental, exemplary, punitive or consequential damages from CVR Energy or certain affiliates.
Net amounts incurred under the services agreement for the year ended December 31, 2017 were approximately $16.0 million and were included in direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) and selling, general and administrative expenses. At December 31, 2017, payables of $4.0 million were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with respect to amounts billed in accordance with the services agreement.
GP Services Agreement
The Partnership is party to a GP Services Agreement by and among the Partnership, CVR GP, LLC and CVR Energy. This agreement allows CVR Energy to engage CVR GP, LLC, in its capacity as the Partnership's general partner, to provide CVR Energy with (i) business development and related services and (ii) advice or recommendations for such other projects as may be agreed between the Partnership's general partner and CVR Energy from time to time. As payment for certain specific services provided under the agreement, CVR Energy must pay a prorated share of costs incurred by the Partnership or its general partner in connection with the employment of the certain employees who provide CVR Energy services on a part-time basis, as determined by the Partnership's general partner on a commercially reasonable basis based on the percentage of total working time that such shared personnel are engaged in performing services for CVR Energy. CVR Energy is not required to directly pay any compensation, salaries, bonuses or benefits to any of the Partnership's or general partner's employees who provide services to CVR Energy on a full-time or part-time basis, thus the Partnership will continue to pay their compensation.
Either CVR Energy or the Partnership's general partner may temporarily or permanently exclude any particular service from the scope of the agreement upon 180 days' notice. The Partnership's general partner also has the right to delegate the performance of some or all of the services to be provided pursuant to the agreement to one of its affiliates or any other person or entity, though such delegation does not relieve the Partnership's general partner from its obligations under the agreement. Either CVR Energy or the Partnership's general partner may terminate the agreement upon at least 180 days' notice, but not more than one year's notice. Furthermore, CVR Energy may terminate the agreement immediately if the Partnership, or its general partner, become bankrupt, or dissolve and commence liquidation or winding-up.
Trademark License Agreement
We are party to a Trademark License Agreement with CVR Energy pursuant to which CVR Energy has granted us a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use the Coffeyville Resources word mark and the CVR Partners and Coffeyville Resources logos in connection with our business. We agreed to use the marks only in the form and manner and with appropriate legends as prescribed from time to time by CVR Energy, and CVR Energy agreed that the nature and quality of the business that uses the marks will conform to standards currently applied by CVR Partners. Either party can terminate the license with 60 days' prior notice.

Registration Rights Agreements
In connection with our Initial Public Offering, we entered into an amended and restated registration rights agreement with CRLLC in April 2011, pursuant to which we may be required to register the sale of the common units CRLLC holds. Under the amended and restated registration rights agreement, CRLLC has the right to request that we register the sale of common units held by it on its behalf on six occasions, including requiring us to make available shelf registration statements permitting sales of common units into the market from time to time over an extended period. In addition, CRLLC and its permitted transferees have the ability to exercise certain piggyback registration rights with respect to their securities if we elect to register any of our equity interests. The registration rights agreement also includes provisions dealing with holdback agreements, indemnification and contribution, and allocation of expenses. All of our common units held by CRLLC and any permitted transferee will be entitled to these registration rights, except that the demand registration rights may only be transferred in whole and not in part.
In connection with the East Dubuque Merger, we entered into a registration rights agreement with CRLLC and Rentech in August 2015, pursuant to which we may be required to register the sale of the common units Rentech and GSO (as a permitted transferee) holds. Under the registration rights agreement, Rentech has the right to request that we register the sale of common units held by it on its behalf on four occasions, including requiring us to make available shelf registration statements permitting sales of common units into the market from time to time over an extended period. In addition, Rentech and its permitted transferees have the ability to exercise certain piggyback registration rights with respect to their securities if we elect to register any of our equity interests. The registration rights agreement also includes provisions dealing with holdback agreements, indemnification and contribution, and allocation of expenses. All of our common units held by Rentech and any permitted transferee will be entitled to these registration rights.
Agreements with IEP
Railcar Lease Agreement and Maintenance
In the second quarter of 2016, CRNF entered into agreements to lease a total of 115 UAN railcars from American Railcar Leasing, LLC ("ARL"), a company controlled by IEP, which will expire in 2023. In the first quarter of 2017, ARI Leasing, LLC ("ARI"), a company controlled by IEP, assumed the lease from ARL. In the second quarter of 2017, CRNF entered into an agreement to lease an additional 70 UAN railcars from ARI which will expire in 2022. The Partnership received the additional 70 leased railcars during the second half of 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2017, rent expense of approximately $1.0 million was recorded in cost of materials and other in the Consolidated Statement of Operations related to these agreements.
American Railcar Industries, Inc., a company controlled by IEP, performed railcar maintenance for CRNF and the expense associated with this maintenance was approximately $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and was included in cost of materials and other in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Insight Portfolio Group 

Insight Portfolio Group LLC ("(“Insight Portfolio Group"Group”) is an entity formed and controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn in order to maximize the potential buying power of a group of entities with which Mr. Icahn has a relationship in negotiating with a wide range of suppliers of goods, services, and tangible and intangible property at negotiated rates. In January 2013, CVR Energy acquired a minority equity interest inFor 2020 and 2019, the Partnership did not pay any fees to Insight Portfolio Group. The Partnership participates inHowever, we indirectly received services from certain of CVR Energy’s negotiated agreements with third parties, certain of which were initiated through the Insight Portfolio Group’s buying group throughGroup. On January 23, 2020, CVR Energy assigned its relationshipminority equity interests to a third party, terminated its agreement, and is no longer expected to transact with, CVR Energy. The Partnership may purchase a variety of goods and services as members of the buying group at prices and on terms that management believes would be more favorable than those which would be achieved on a stand-alone basis. Transactions with Insight Portfolio Group for the year ended December 31, 2017 were nominal.Group.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of interest exist and may arise in the future as a result of the relationships between our general partner and its affiliates (including IEP, CRLLC,CVR Services, CVR Energy, and CVR Refining), on the one hand, and us and our public unitholders, on the other hand. Conflicts may arise as a result of (i) the overlap of directors and officers between our general partner and CVR Energy, and CVR Refining, which may result in conflicting obligations by these officers and directors, and (ii) duties of our general partner to act for the benefit of CVR Energy and its stockholders, which may conflict with our interests and the interests of our public unitholders. The directors and officers of our general partner have fiduciary duties to manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to CRLLC,CVR Services, its owner, and the stockholders of CVR Energy, its indirect parent. At the same time, our general partner has a contractual duty under our partnership agreement to manage us in a manner that is in our best interests.

Whenever a conflict arises between our general partner, on the one hand, and usCVR Services or any other public unitholder, on the other, our general partner will resolve that conflict. Our partnership agreement contains provisions that replace default fiduciary

duties with contractual corporate governance standards as set forth therein. Our partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken that, without such replacement, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.
Our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under our partnership agreement or its duties to us or our unitholders if the resolution of a conflict is:
approved by the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general partner, although our general partner is not obligated to seek such approval;
approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding any units owned by the general partner or any of its affiliates, although our general partner is not obligated to seek such approval;
on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or
fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of the relationships between the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us.
Our general partner may, but is not required to, seek the approval of such resolution from the conflicts committee of its board of directors or from the common unitholders. If our general partner does not seek approval from the conflicts committee and its board of directors determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the third and fourth bullet points above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the board of directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the partnership, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption. Unless the resolution of a conflict is specifically provided for in our partnership agreement, our general partner or the conflicts committee may consider any factors it determines in good faith to consider when resolving a conflict. When our partnership agreement requires someone to act in good faith, it requires that person to reasonably believe that he is acting in the best interests of the partnership, unless the context otherwise requires.
Related Party Transaction Policy
The board of directors of our general partner
Our Board has adopted a Related Party Transaction Policy, which is designed to monitor and ensure the proper review, approval, ratification, and disclosure of related party transactions involving us. This policy applies to any transaction, arrangement, or relationship (or any series of similar or related transactions, arrangements, or relationships) in which we are a participant, and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related party had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. At the discretion of the board,Board, a proposed related party transaction may generally be reviewed by the boardBoard in its entirety or by a "conflicts committee"“conflicts committee” meeting the definitional requirements for such a committee under our partnership agreement. After appropriate review, the boardBoard or the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee may approve or ratify a related party transaction if such transaction is consistent with the Related Party Transaction Policy and is on terms that, taken as a whole, are no less favorable to us than could be obtained in an arm's-lengtharm’s-length transaction with an unrelated third party,third-party, unless the boardBoard or the conflicts committeeConflicts Committee otherwise determines that the transaction is not in our best interests. Related party transactions involving
December 31, 2020 | 100


compensation will be approved by the boardBoard in its entirety or by the compensation committeeCompensation Committee of the boardBoard in lieu of the conflicts committee.Conflicts Committee.

On October 18, 2019, the Conflicts Committee of the Board and on October 22, 2019, the audit committee of CVR Energy, each agreed to authorize the exchange of certain parcels of property owned by a subsidiary of CVR Energy with an equal number of parcels owned by a subsidiary of CVR Partners, all located in Coffeyville, Kansas (the “Property Exchange”). On February 19, 2020, a subsidiary of CVR Energy and a subsidiary of CVR Partners executed the Property Exchange agreement effectuating the same. This Property Exchange will enable each such subsidiary to create a more usable, contiguous parcel of land near its own operating footprint. CVR Energy and the Partnership accounted for this transaction in accordance with the Topic 805-50 guidance on transferring assets between entities under common control. This transaction had a net impact to the Partnership’s partners’ capital of approximately $0.1 million.

Director Independence

The NYSE does not require a listed publicly traded partnership, such as ours, to have a majority of independent directors on the board of directorsBoard of our general partner. The board of directors of our general partnerBoard consists of eight directors, three of whom the boardBoard has affirmatively determined are independent in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.NYSE. For a discussion of the independence of the board of directors of our general partner,Board, please see Part III, Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance — Management of CVR Partners, LP.Governance.


Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Grant Thornton LLP ("(“Grant Thornton"Thornton”) has served as the Partnership'sPartnership’s independent public registered accounting firm since August 2013. The Audit Committee has not selected the independent registered public accounting firm to conduct the audit of our books and records for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.2021.

The charter of the audit committeeAudit Committee of the board of directors of our general partner,Board, which is available on our website at www.cvrpartners.com, requires the audit committeeAudit Committee to pre-approve all audit services and non-audit services (other than de minimisde-minimis non-audit services as defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. The audit committeeAudit Committee has a pre-approval policy with respect to services that may be performed by the independent auditors. The Partnership's audit committeeAudit Committee pre-approved all fees incurred in fiscal year 2017.2020.

The following table presentsrepresents fees billed and expected to be billed for professional services and other services in the following categories and amounts by Grant Thornton for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Audit fees (1)$654 $654 
Audit-related fees— — 
Tax fees— — 
All other fees— — 
Total$654 $654 
 Fiscal Fiscal
 Year 2017 Year 2016
    
 (in thousands)
Audit fees (1)$654
 $1,328
Audit-related fees
 
Tax fees
 
All other fees
 
Total$654
 $1,328

(1)Represents the aggregate fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Partnership's financial statements, the audit of the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting, comfort letters, consents and consultations on financial accounting and reporting standards arising during the course of the audits and reviews. Also includes the review of the consolidated financial statements included in the Partnership's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

(1)Represents the aggregate fees for professional services rendered for the annual audit of the Partnership’s financial statements, the annual audit of the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting, comfort letters, consents, and consultations on financial accounting and reporting standards arising during the course of the audits and reviews. Also includes the review of the consolidated financial statements included in the Partnership’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
December 31, 2020 | 101


PART IV


Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Financial Statements
- See "Index to Consolidated Financial Statements" Contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Report.Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
- All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"“SEC”) are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

(a)(3) Exhibits
Exhibit NumberExhibit Description
Exhibit NumberExhibit Title
3.1**
3.2**
4.2**

10.3**

December 31, 2020 | 102


10.15**+
10.15.2**+
10.18**
10.20**

10.25**+
December 31, 2020 | 103


10.26**+
10.27*+
21.1**
31.4*
32.1†
101101*The following financial information for CVR Partners, LP'sLP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, formatted in XBRL ("(“Extensible Business Reporting Language"Language”) includes: (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (4) Consolidated Statement of Partners'Partners’ Capital, (5)  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (6) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.
*104*Filed herewith.Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

**Previously filed.
Furnished herewith.
+Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

*    Filed herewith.
**    Previously filed.
†    Furnished herewith.
+    Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

PLEASE NOTE:NOTE: Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, we may file or incorporatedincorporate by reference agreements referenced as exhibits to the reports that we file with or furnish to the SEC. The agreements are filed to provide investors with information regarding their respective terms. The agreements are not intended to provide any other factual information about the Partnership or its business or operations. In particular, the assertions embodied in any representations, warranties and covenants contained in the agreements may be subject to qualifications with respect to knowledge and materiality different from those applicable to investors and may be qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules not included with the exhibits. These disclosure schedules may contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations, warranties and covenants set forth in the agreements. Moreover, certain representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements may have been used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties, rather than establishing matters as facts. In addition, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may

have changed after the date of the respective agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the Partnership'sPartnership’s public disclosures. Accordingly, investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements as characterizations of the actual state of facts about the Partnership or its business or operations on the date hereof.




Item 16.    Form 10-K Summary

None.

December 31, 2020 | 104


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CVR Partners, LP
By:CVR GP, LLC, its general partner
By:/s/ MARK A. PYTOSH
Mark A. Pytosh
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 22, 201823, 2021
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report had been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ DAVID L. LAMPChairman of the Board of Directors, Executive Chairman (Principal
(Principal
Executive Officer)
February 22, 201823, 2021
David L. Lamp
/s/ MARK A. PYTOSHDirector, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
(Principal
Executive Officer)
February 22, 201823, 2021
Mark A. Pytosh
/s/ SUSAN M. BALLTRACY D. JACKSONExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
February 22, 201823, 2021
Susan M. BallTracy D. Jackson
/s/ MATTHEW W. BLEYChief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)February 23, 2021
Matthew W. Bley
/s/ DONNA R. ECTONDirectorFebruary 22, 201823, 2021
Donna R. Ecton
/s/ JONATHAN FRATESDirectorFebruary 22, 201823, 2021
Jonathan Frates
/s/ ANDREW LANGHAMDirectorFebruary 22, 201823, 2021
Andrew Langham
/s/ FRANK M. MULLER, JR.DirectorFebruary 22, 201823, 2021
Frank M. Muller, Jr.
/s/ LOUIS J. PASTORHUNTER C. GARYDirectorFebruary 22, 201823, 2021
Louis J. PastorHunter C. Gary
/s/ PETER K. SHEADirectorFebruary 22, 201823, 2021
Peter K. Shea




142
December 31, 2020 | 105