UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 20132014

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from _______________ to _______________ .      

 

Commission file number0-17706

 

QNB Corp.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Pennsylvania

 

23-2318082

(State (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S.(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

15 North Third Street, P.O. Box 9005 Quakertown, PA

18951-9005

 (Address of Principal Executive Offices)     

 (Zip Code)

 

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code18951-9005(215) 538-5600

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code) 

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code(215) 538-5600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class 

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

None

 

N/A

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Common Stock, $0.625 par value

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ____ No         

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ____ No       

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ☑No____ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ☑No____ 

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K [✔[☑]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer    ____          

Accelerated filer      

Non-accelerated filer ____   

Smaller Reporting Company            Non-accelerated filer    ____            Smaller reporting company  

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ____ No      

 

As of February 28, 2014, 3,276,152March 4, 2015, 3,322,985 shares of common stock of the registrant were outstanding. As of June 30, 2013,2014, the aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates was approximately $69,369,990$78,360,328 based upon the average bid and asked prices of the common stock as reported on the OTC BB.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of registrant’s Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of its shareholders to be held May 27, 201426, 2015 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.

 

 
 

 

 

FORM 10-K INDEX

 

PART I

 

PAGE

PART I  

Item 1

Business

3

  

Item 1A

Risk Factors

Risk Factors

98

  

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

13

  

Item 2

Properties

13

  

Item 3

Legal Proceedings

13

  

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

13

  

  

PART II

 

  

Item 5

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

14

  

Item 6

Selected Financial Data

16

  

Item 7

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

16

  

Item 7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

4342

  

Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4342

  

Item 9

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

88

Item 9A

Controls and Procedures

88

Item 9B

Other Information

88

PART III

Item 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

89

  

Item 11

9A  

Executive Compensation

Controls and Procedures

89

  

Item 9B  Other Information

89

PART III

Item 10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

90

Item 11Executive Compensation

90

Item 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

8990

  

Item 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

89

Item 14

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

90

  

Item 14Principal Accounting Fees and Services

91

  

PART IV

  

PART IV

Item 15

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

9091

 

 
- 2 -

 

 

PART I

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

In addition to historical information, this document contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project” and variations of such words and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “may” or similar expressions. The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor in regard to the inclusion of forward-looking statements in this document and documents incorporated by reference.

 

Shareholders should note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this document and in the documents that are incorporated by reference, could affect the future financial results of QNB Corp. and its subsidiary and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward looking statements contained or incorporated by reference in this document. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

Volatility in interest rates and shape of the yield curve;

Credit risk;

Liquidity risk;

Operating, legal and regulatory risks;

Economic, political and competitive forces affecting QNB Corp.’s business;

The risk that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) could levy additional insurance assessments on all insured institutions in order to replenish the Deposit Insurance Fund based on the level of bank failures in the future; and

The risk that the analysis of these risks and forces could be incorrect, and/or that the strategies developed to address them could be unsuccessful.

 

QNB Corp. (herein referred to as “QNB” or the “Company”) cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, all of which change over time, and QNB assumes no duty to update forward-looking statements. Management cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, even if subsequently made available by QNB on its website or otherwise, and they advise readers that various factors, including those described above, could affect QNB’s financial performance and could cause actual results or circumstances for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected. Except as required by law, QNB does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

 

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

Overview

QNB was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on June 4, 1984. QNB is registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and conducts its business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, QNB Bank (the “Bank”).

 

Prior to December 28, 2007, the Bank was a national banking association organized in 1877 as The Quakertown National Bank, was chartered under the National Banking Act and was subject to Federal and state laws applicable to national banks. Effective December 28, 2007, the Bank became a Pennsylvania chartered commercial bank and changed its name to QNB Bank. The Bank’sBank, whose principal office is located in Quakertown, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. As of December 31, 2013, the Bank alsoPennsylvania operated ten othereleven full-service community banking offices in Bucks, Montgomery and Lehigh counties in southeastern Pennsylvania.Pennsylvania as of December 31, 2014.

 

The Bank is engaged in the general commercial banking business and provides a full range of banking services to its customers. These banking services consist of, among other things, attracting deposits and using these funds in making commercial loans, residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, and purchasing investment securities. These deposits are in the form of time, demand and savings accounts. Time deposits include certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts. The Bank’s demand and savings accounts include money market accounts, interest-bearing demand accounts (including a high-yieldhigher yielding checking account), club accounts, traditional statement savings accounts, and a high-yieldhigher yielding online savings account.

 

At December 31, 2013,2014, QNB had total assets of $932,883,000,$977,135,000, total loans of $501,716,000,$555,282,000, total deposits of $814,532,000$851,592,000 and total shareholders’ equity of $75,625,000.$86,354,000. For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, QNB reported net income of $8,392,000$8,998,000 compared to net income for the year ended December 31, 20122013 of $9,175,000.$8,392,000.

 

At February 28, 2014,27, 2015, the Bank had 162169 full-time employees and 2116 part-time employees. The Bank’s employees have a customer-oriented philosophy, a strong commitment to service and a “sincere interest” in their customers’ success. They maintain close contact with both the residents and local business people in the communities in which they serve, responding to changes in market conditions and customer requests in a timely manner.

 

 
- 3 -

 

 

Competition and Market Area

The banking business is highly competitive, and the profitability of QNB depends principally upon the Bank’s ability to compete in its market area. QNB faces intense competition within its market, both in making loans and attracting deposits. Bucks, Lehigh, and Montgomery counties have a high concentration of financial institutions, including large national and regional banks, community banks, savings institutions and credit unions. Some of QNB’s competitors offer products and services that QNB currently does not offer, such as traditional trust services and full-service insurance.

 

In addition, as a result of consolidation in the banking industry, some of QNB’s competitors may enjoy advantages such as greater financial resources, a wider geographic presence, more favorable pricing alternatives and lower origination and operating costs. However, QNB has been able to compete effectively with other financial institutions by emphasizing the establishment of long-term relationships and customer loyalty. A strong focus on small-business solutions, providing fast local decision-making on loans, exceptional personal customer service and technology solutions, including internet-banking,internet- and mobile-banking, electronic bill pay and remote deposit capture, also enable QNB to compete successfully.

 

Competition for loans and deposits comes principally from commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions and non-bank financial service providers. Factors in successfully competing for deposits include providing excellent customer service, convenient locations and hours of operation, attractive rates, low fees, and alternative delivery systems. One such delivery system is remote deposit capture for those commercial customers that are not conveniently located near one of our branches. During 2013 remote check deposit was introducedbranches, or mobile banking for retail customers to make deposits using their smartphone.customers. Successful loan origination tends to depend not only on interest rate and terms of the loan but on being responsive and flexible to the customers’ needs. While many competitors within the Bank’s primary market have substantially higher legal lending limits, QNB often has the ability, through loan participations, to meet the larger lending needs of its customers.

 

QNB’s success is dependent to a significant degree on economic conditions in southeastern Pennsylvania, especially Bucks, Lehigh and Montgomery counties, which it defines as its primary market. The banking industry is affected by general economic conditions, including the effects of recession, unemployment, declining real estate values, inflation, trends in the national and global economies, and other factors beyond QNB’s control.

 

MonetaryMonetary Policy and Economic Conditions

The business of financial institutions is affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the policies of various governmental regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board regulates money, credit conditions and interest rates to influence general economic conditions primarily through open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate on bank borrowings and changes in the reserve requirements against depository institutions’ deposits. These policies and regulations significantly affect the overall growth and distribution of loans, investments and deposits, as well as the interest rates charged on loans and the interest rates paid on deposits.

 

The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on the operating results of financial institutions in the past and are expected to continue to have significant effects in the future. In view of the changing conditions in the economy and the financial markets in addition to the activities of monetary and fiscal authorities, the prediction of future changes in interest rates, credit availability or deposit levels is very challenging.

 

SupervisionSupervision and Regulation

Banks and bank holding companies operate in a highly regulated environment and are regularly examined by Federal and state regulatory authorities. Federal statutes that apply to QNB and its subsidiary include the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (“BHCA”), the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”), as those statutes have been significantly amended by recent laws such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”), and others. In general, these statutes regulate the corporate governance of the Bank and eligible business activities of QNB, and impose certain restrictions and limitations on such important matters as mergers and acquisitions, intercompany transactions, loans and dividends, and capital adequacy, among others. Other corporate governance requirements are imposed on QNB by Federal securities and other laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, described later.

 

The Company is under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission and of state securities commissions for matters relating to the offering and sale of its securities. In addition, the Company is subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations relating to periodic reporting, proxy solicitation and insider trading.

 

Set forth below is a brief summary of some of the significant regulatory concepts and recent laws that affect QNB and the Bank. To the extent that the following information describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by references to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions themselves. Proposals to change banking laws and regulations are frequently introduced in Congress, the state legislatures, and before the various bank regulatory agencies. QNB cannot determine the likelihood of passage or timing of any such proposals or legislation or the impact they may have on QNB and its subsidiary. A change in law, regulations or regulatory policy may have a material effect on QNB and its subsidiary.

 

 
- 4 -

 

 

Bank Holding Company Regulation

QNB is registered as a bank holding company and is subject to the regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) under the BHCA. In addition, QNB Corp., as a Pennsylvania business corporation, is also subject to the provisions of Section 115 of the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965 and the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as amended.

 

Bank holding companies are required to file periodic reports with, and are subject to examination by, the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve’s regulations require a bank holding company to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks. As a result, the Federal Reserve, pursuant to its “source of strength” regulations, may require QNB to commit its resources to provide adequate capital funds to the Bank during periods of financial distress or adversity.

 

Federal Reserve approval may be required before QNB may begin to engage in any non-banking activity and before any non-banking business may be acquired by QNB.

 

Regulatory Restrictions on Dividends

Dividend payments made by the Bank to the Company are subject to the Pennsylvania Banking Code, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, and the regulations of the FDIC. Under the Banking Code, no dividends may be paid except from “accumulated net earnings” (generally retained earnings). The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have formal and informal policies which provide that insured banks and bank holding companies should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings, with some exceptions. Under the FDIA, the Bank is prohibited from paying any dividends, making other distributions or paying any management fees if, after such payment, it would fail to satisfy its minimum capital requirements. The Pennsylvania Banking Code restricts the availability of capital funds for payment of dividends by the Bank generally to its accumulated net earnings. See also “Supervision and Regulation – Bank Regulation”.

 

In addition to the dividend restrictions described above, the banking regulators have the authority to prohibit or to limit the payment of dividends by the Bank if, in the banking regulator’s opinion, payment of a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in light of the financial condition of the Bank.

 

Under Pennsylvania law, QNB may not pay a dividend, if, after giving effect thereto, it would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business and, after giving effect to the dividend, the total assets of QNB would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if QNB were to be dissolved at the time of distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of shareholders whose rights are superior to those receiving the dividend.

 

It is also the policy of the Federal Reserve that a bank holding company generally only pay dividends on common stock out of net income available to common shareholders over the past year and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with a bank holding company’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. In the current financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve has indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out ratios at the 100% level unless both asset quality and capital are very strong. A bank holding company also should not maintain a dividend level that places undue pressure on the capital of such institution’s subsidiaries, or that may undermine the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength for such subsidiaries.

 

Under these policies and subject to the restrictions applicable to the Bank, to remain “well-capitalized,” the Bank had approximately $19,323,000$20,770,000 available for payment of dividends to the Company at December 31, 2013.2014.

 

Capital Adequacy

Bank holding companies are required to comply with the Federal Reserve’s risk-based capital guidelines. The required minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) is 8%. At least half of total capital must be Tier 1 capital. Tier 1 capital consists principally of common shareholders’ equity, plus retained earnings, less certain intangible assets. The remainder of total capital may consist of the allowance for loan losses, which is considered Tier 2 capital. At December 31, 2013,2014, QNB’s Tier 1 capital and total capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2 combined) ratios were 12.68%12.79% and 14.01%14.06%, respectively.

 

In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the Federal Reserve requires a bank holding company to maintain a minimum leverage ratio. This requires a minimum level of Tier 1 capital (as determined under the risk-based capital rules) to average total consolidated assets of 4% for those bank holding companies that have the highest regulatory examination ratings and are not contemplating or experiencing significant growth or expansion. The Federal Reserve expects all other bank holding companies to maintain a ratio of at least 1% to 2% above the stated minimum. At December 31, 2013,2014, QNB’s leverage ratio was 8.45%8.65%.

 

Pursuant to the prompt corrective action provisions of the FDIA, the Federal banking agencies have specified, by regulation, the levels at which an insured institution is considered well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized. Under these regulations, an institution is considered well capitalized if it satisfies each of the following requirements:

Total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or more,

Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or more,

Leverage ratio of 5% or more, and

Not subject to any order or written directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level

  

 
- 5 -

 

 

At December 31, 2013,2014, the Bank qualified as well capitalized under these regulatory standards. See Note 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included at Item 8 of this Report for additional information.

 

In July 2013, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted revisions to the agencies’ capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules, which were designed to enhance such requirements and implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly referred to as Basel III. The final rules generally implement higher minimum capital requirements, add a new common equity Tier 1 capital requirement, and establish criteria that instruments must meet to be considered common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital or Tier 2 capital. The new minimum capital to risk-adjusted assets requirements are a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% (6.5% to be considered “well capitalized”) and a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, increased from 4.0% (and increased from 6.0% to 8.0% to be considered “well capitalized”); the total capital ratio remains at 8.0% under the new rules (10.0% to be considered “well capitalized”). Under the new rules, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity Tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets. The new minimum capital requirements are effective on January 1, 2015. The capital contribution buffer requirements phase in over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2016.

 

Bank Regulation

As a Pennsylvania chartered, insured commercial bank, the Bank is subject to extensive regulation and examination by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities (the Department) and by the FDIC, which insures its deposits to the maximum extent permitted by law.

 

The Federal and state laws and regulations applicable to banks regulate, among other things, the scope of their business, their investments, the reserves required to be kept against deposits, the timing of the availability of deposited funds, the nature and amount of collateral for certain loans, the activities of a bank with respect to mergers and consolidations, and the establishment of branches. The laws and regulations governing the Bank generally have been promulgated to protect depositors and not for the purpose of protecting QNB’s shareholders. This regulatory structure also gives the Federal and state banking agencies extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Any change in such regulation, whether by the Department, the FDIC or the United States Congress, could have a material impact on the Company, the Bank and their operations.

 

As a subsidiary bank of a bank holding company, the Bank is subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on extensions of credit to QNB, on investments in the stock or other securities of QNB, and on taking such stock or securities as collateral for loans.

 

FDIC Insurance Assessments

The Bank’s deposits are insured to the applicable limits as determined by the FDIC, which is currently $250,000 per depositor.

 

The FDIC has adopted a risk-based premium system that provides for quarterly assessments (billed in arrears) based on an insured institution’s ranking in one of four risk categories based on their examination ratings and capital ratios. Well-capitalized institutions with the CAMELS ratings of 1 or 2 are grouped in Risk Category I.

 

Beginning with the second quarter of 2011, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the assessment base that the FDIC uses to calculate assessment premiums is a bank’s average assets minus average tangible equity. As the asset base of the banking industry is larger than the deposit base, the range of assessment rates will be from a low of 2.5 basis points to a high of 45 basis points, per $100 of assets.

 

The FDIC is required under the Dodd-Frank Act to establish assessment rates that will allow the Deposit Insurance Fund to achieve a reserve ratio of 1.35% of Insurance Fund insured deposits by September 2020. In addition, the FDIC has established a “designated reserve ratio” of 2.0%, a target ratio that, until it is achieved, will not likely result in the FDIC reducing assessment rates. In attempting to achieve the mandated 1.35% ratio, the FDIC is required to implement assessment formulas that charge banks over $10 billion in asset size more than banks under that size. Those new formulas began in the second quarter of 2011, but did not affect the Bank. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC is authorized to make reimbursements from the Insurance Fund to banks if the reserve ratio exceeds 1.50%, but the FDIC has adopted the “designated reserve ratio” of 2.0% and has announced that any reimbursements from the fund are indefinitely suspended. For the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the Bank recorded $651,000$620,000 and $642,000,$651,000, respectively, in FDIC deposit insurance premium expense.

 

In addition, all insured institutions of the FDIC are required to pay assessments to fund interest payments on Financing Corporation (FICO) bonds. The Financing Corporation was created by Congress to issue bonds to finance the resolution of failed thrift institutions. Prior to 1997, only thrift institutions were subject to assessments to raise funds to pay the FICO bonds; however, beginning in 2000, commercial banks and thrifts are subject to the same assessment for FICO bonds. The FDIC has the authority to set the Financing Corporation assessment rate every quarter. The expense for 20132014 and 20122013 recorded by QNB was $54,000$66,000 and $53,000,$54,000, respectively. These assessments will continue until the Financing Corporation bonds mature in 2017. from 2017 through 2019.

 

 
- 6 -

 

 

Federal Home Loan Bank System

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB), which is one of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. Each Federal Home Loan Bank serves as a reserve or central bank for members within its assigned region. It is funded primarily from funds deposited by member institutions and proceeds from the sale of consolidated obligations of the Federal Home Loan Bank System. It makes loans to members (i.e. advances) in accordance with policies and procedures established by the board of directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank. At December 31, 2013,2014, the Bank had no overnight FHLB advances outstanding.

 

As a member, the Bank is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB in an amount equal to the greater of 1% of its aggregate unpaid residential mortgage loans, home purchase contracts or similar obligations at the beginning of each year or 5% of its outstanding advances from the FHLB. At December 31, 2013,2014, the Bank had $1,752,000$635,000 in stock of the FHLB.

 

Community Reinvestment Act

Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), as amended, the FDIC is required to assess all financial institutions that it regulates to determine whether these institutions are meeting the credit needs of the communities that they serve. The act focuses specifically on low and moderate income neighborhoods.

 

An institution’s record is considered during the evaluation of any application made by such institutions for, among other things:

Approval of a branch or other deposit facility;

An office relocation or a merger; and

Any acquisition of bank shares.

 

The CRA, as amended, also requires that the regulatory agency make publicly available the evaluation of the Bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. This evaluation includes a descriptive rating of either outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve, or substantial noncompliance, and a statement describing the basis for the rating. The Bank’s most recent CRA rating was “Satisfactory”.

 

USA Patriot Act

The USA Patriot Act strengthens the anti-money laundering provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act. The Act requires financial institutions to establish certain procedures to be able to identify and verify the identity of its customers. Specifically the Bank must have procedures in place to:

Verify the identity of persons applying to open an account;

Ensure adequate maintenance of the records used to verify a person’s identity; and

Determine whether a person is on any U.S. government agency list of known or suspected terrorists or a terrorist organization.

 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is intended to bolster public confidence in the nation’s capital markets by imposing new duties and penalties for non-compliance on public companies and their executives, directors, auditors, attorneys and securities analysts. Some of the more significant aspects of the Act include:

Corporate Responsibility for Financial Reports - requires Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) and Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) to certify certain matters relating to a company’s financial records and accounting and internal controls.

Management Assessment of Internal Controls - requires auditors to certify the company’s underlying controls and processes that are used to compile the financial results for companies that are accelerated filers.

Real-time Issuer Disclosures - requires that companies provide real-time disclosures of any events that may affect its stock price or financial performance, generally within a 48-hour period.

Criminal Penalties for Altering Documents - provides severe penalties for “whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates” any record or document with intent to impede an investigation. Penalties include monetary fines and prison time.

 

The Act also imposes requirements for corporate governance, auditor independence, accounting standards, audit committee member independence and increased authority, executive compensation, insider loans and whistleblower protection. As a result of the Act, QNB adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to its CEO, CFO and Controller, which meets the requirements of the Act, to supplement its long-standing Code of Ethics, which applies to all directors and employees.

 

QNB’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be found on the Bank’s website at www.qnbbank.com.

 

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act)

The Dodd-Frank Act was enacted on July 21, 2010. This law made significant changes to the bank regulatory structure and affects the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies.

 

The Dodd-Frank Act required various Federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new rules and regulations, and to prepare various studies and reports for Congress. The Federal agencies were given significant discretion in drafting such rules and regulations, and are still modifying many of the provisions. Consequently, many of the details and much of the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for some time.

 

 
- 7 -

 

 

Bank and thrift holding companies with assets of less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009, such as the Company, will be permitted to include trust preferred securities that were issued before May 19, 2010, as Tier 1 capital; however, trust preferred securities issued by a bank or thrift holding company (other than those with assets of less than $500 million) after May 19, 2010, will no longer count as Tier 1 capital. Trust preferred securities still will be entitled to be treated as Tier 2 capital.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” arrangements, and may allow greater access by shareholders to the company’s proxy material by authorizing the SEC to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded.

 

The Dodd-Frank Act created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets such as the Bank will continue to be examined for compliance with the consumer laws by their primary bank regulators. The Dodd-Frank Act also weakened the Federal preemption rules that had been applicable for national banks and Federal savings associations, and gave state attorneys general the ability to enforce Federal consumer protection laws.

 

As mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, in December 2013, the OCC, FRB, FDIC, and SEC issued a final rule implementing certain prohibitions and restrictions on the ability of a banking entity and non-bank financial company supervised by the FRB to engage in proprietary trading and have certain interests in, or relationships with, a hedge fund or private equity fund (the so-called "Volcker Rule"). The final rules also require regulated entities to establish an internal compliance program that is consistent with the extent to which it engages in activities covered by the Volcker Rule, which must include making regular reports about those activities to regulators. Although the final rules provide some compliance and reporting exceptions based on size, the fundamental prohibitions of the Volcker Rule apply to banking entities of any size, including the Company. The final rules arewere effective April 1, 2014, with an extended effective date of July 2015. Under the final rules implementing the Volcker Rule, financial institutions are prohibited from owning certain covered funds. The Company has reviewed its securities holdings and does not believe that any qualify as impermissible holdings. If future regulatory interpretation requires us to divest of any such investments, it could cause us to recognize unexpected losses on the dispositions.

 

At this time it is difficult to predict the specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act will have on community banks, such as the Bank. Many of the provisions of Dodd-Frank do not apply to the Bank, as it does not engage in many of the specific activities sought to be regulated by Dodd-Frank. Many of the provisions, however, such as the increased capital requirements that begin in 2015 and the changes to FDIC insurance premiums already implemented, affect all banking entities. In addition, the financial crisis of 2008 and the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in response to that crisis has resulted in an era of increased regulatory oversight over all financial entities. The ultimate changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability of our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, impose upon us more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements or otherwise adversely affect our business. These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.

 

Possible Future Legislation

Congress is often considering some financial industry legislation, and the Federal banking agencies routinely propose new regulations. The Company cannot predict the future effect any new legislation, or new rules adopted by Federal or state banking agencies will have on the business of the Company and its subsidiaries. Given that the financial industry remains under stress and severe scrutiny, and given that the U.S. economy has not yet fully recovered to pre-crisis levels of activity, the Company expects that there will be significant legislation and regulatory actions that may materially affect the banking industry for the foreseeable future.

 

Additional Information

QNB’s principal executive offices are located at 320 West Broad Street, Quakertown, Pennsylvania. Its telephone number is (215) 538-5600. This annual report, including the exhibits and schedules filed as part of the annual report on Form 10-K, may be inspected at the public reference facility maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at its public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 and copies of all, or any part thereof, may be obtained from that office upon payment of the prescribed fees. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room, and you can request copies of the documents upon payment of a duplicating fee by writing to the SEC. In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants, including QNB, that file electronically with the SEC which can be accessed at www.sec.gov.

 

QNB also makes its periodic and current reports available, free of charge, on its website, www.qnbbank.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the SEC. Information available on the website is not a part of, and should not be incorporated into, this annual report on Form 10-K.

 

- 8 -

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

The following discusses risks that management believes are specific to our business and could have a negative impact on QNB’s financial performance. When analyzing an investment in QNB, the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report, should be carefully considered. This list should not be viewed as comprehensive and may not include all risks that may affect the financial performance of QNB.

- 8 -

 

Economic1) Unfavorable economic and Market Riskfinancial market conditions may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Over the past several years, concerns over the stability of the financial markets and the economy have resulted in decreased lending by some financial institutions to their customers and to each other. This market turmoil and tightening of credit led to increased commercial and consumer deficiencies, lack of customer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction in general business activity. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and businesses and the lack of confidence in the financial markets may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on us and others in the industry. In particular, we may face the following risks in connection with these events:

We expect to face increased regulation of our industry. Compliance with such regulation may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.

Our ability to assess the creditworthiness of customers and to estimate the losses inherent in our credit exposure is made more complex by these difficult market and economic conditions.

We also may be required to pay higher FDIC premiums because further financial institution failures could reduce the deposit insurance fund and its ratio of reserves to insured deposits to a level where higher premiums would be necessary.

Our ability to borrow from other financial institutions or the FHLB could be adversely affected by disruptions in the capital markets or other events.

We may experience increases in foreclosures, delinquencies and customer bankruptcies.

 

Interest Rate Risk2) Our net interest income, net income and results of operations are sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates.

QNB’s profitability is largely a function of the spread between the interest rates earned on earning assets and the interest rates paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. Like most financial institutions, QNB’s net interest income and margin will be affected by general economic conditions and other factors, including fiscal and monetary policies of the Federal government, that influence market interest rates and QNB’s ability to respond to changes in such rates. At any given time, QNB’s assets and liabilities may be such that they are affected differently by a change in interest rates. As a result, an increase or decrease in rates, the length of loan terms or the mix of adjustable- and fixed-rate loans or investment securities in QNB’s portfolio could have a positive or negative effect on its net income, capital and liquidity. Although management believes it has implemented strategies and guidelines to reduce the potential effects of adverse changes in interest rates on results of operations, any substantial and prolonged change in market interest rates could affect operating results negatively.

 

The yield curve for the various maturities of U.S. Treasury securities provides a fundamental barometer that gauges the prevailing interest rate profile and, simultaneously, acts as a guidepost for current loan and deposit pricing constraints. The slope of the yield curve is driven primarily by expectations for future interest rate increases and inflationary trends. A normal yield curve has a slope that reflects lower costs for shorter-term financial instruments, accompanied by increases in costs for longer term instruments all along the maturity continuum.

 

Short-term interest rates are highly influenced by the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve. The Federal Open Market Committee, a committee of the Federal Reserve, targets the Federal funds rate, the overnight rate at which banks borrow or lend excess funds between financial institutions. This rate serves as a benchmark for the overnight money costs, and correspondingly influences the pricing of a significant portion of a bank’s deposit funding sources. Intermediate and longer-term interest rates, unlike the Federal funds rate, are more directly influenced by external market forces, including perceptions about future interest rates and inflation. These trends, in turn, influence the pricing on mid- and long-term loan commitments as well as deposits and bank borrowings that have scheduled maturities.

 

Generally speaking, a yield curve with a higher degree of slope provides more opportunity to increase the spread between earning asset yields and funding costs. It should be emphasized that while the yield curve is a critical benchmark in setting prices for various monetary assets and liabilities in banks, its influence is not exerted in a vacuum. Credit risk, market risk, competitive issues, and other factors must all be considered in the pricing of financial instruments. A steep or highly-sloped yield curve may be a precursor of higher interest rates or elevated inflation in the future, while a flat yield curve may be characteristic of a Federal Reserve policy designed to calm an overheated economy by tightening credit availability via increases in short-term rates. If other rates along the maturity spectrum do not rise correspondingly, the yield curve can be expected to flatten. This scenario may reflect an economic outlook that has little or no expectation of higher future interest rates or higher rates of inflation. For banks, the presence of a flat yield curve for a prolonged or sustained period could measurably lower expectations for expanding the net interest margin.

 

An inverted yield curve is the opposite of a normal yield curve and is characterized by short-term rates that are higher than longer-term rates. The presence of an inverted yield curve is considered to be an anomaly that is almost counterintuitive to the core business of banking. Inverted yield curves do not typically exist for more than a short period of time. In past economic cycles, the presence of an inverted yield curve has frequently foreshadowed a recession. The recent recessionslow economic recovery that lasted many years may suppress future asset growth trends and/or increase the influence of other forms of risk, such as credit risk, which could hamper opportunities for revenue expansion and earnings growth in the near term.

 

 
- 9 -

 

 

Credit Risk3) We are subject to credit risk in connection with our lending activities, and our financial condition and results of operations may be negatively affected by economic conditions and other factors that could adversely affect our customers.

As a lender, QNB is exposed to the risk that its borrowers may be unable to repay their loans and that the current market value of any collateral securing the payment of their loans may not be sufficient to assure repayment in full. Credit losses are inherent in the lending business and could have a material adverse effect on the operating results of QNB. Adverse changes in the economy or business conditions, either nationally or in QNB’s market areas, could increase credit-related losses and expenses and/or limit growth. Substantially all of QNB’s loans are to businesses and individuals in its limited geographic area and any economic decline in this market could impact QNB adversely. QNB makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of its loan portfolio and provides an allowance for loan losses based on a number of factors. If these assumptions are incorrect, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses and may cause QNB to increase the allowance in the future by increasing the provision for loan losses, thereby having an adverse effect on operating results. QNB has adopted underwriting and credit monitoring procedures and credit policies that management believes are appropriate to control these risks; however, such policies and procedures may not prevent unexpected losses that could have a material adverse effect on QNB’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

Competition4) We face significant competition from other banks and financial institutions in our market area, many of which are larger in terms of asset size and market capitalization.

The financial services industry is highly competitive with competition for attracting and retaining deposits and making loans coming from other banks and savings institutions, credit unions, mutual fund companies, insurance companies and other non-bank businesses. Many of QNB’s competitors are much larger in terms of total assets and market capitalization, have a higher lending limit, have greater access to capital and funding, and offer a broader array of financial products and services. In light of this, QNB’s ability to continue to compete effectively is dependent upon its ability to maintain and build relationships by delivering top quality service.

 

At December 31, 2013,2014, our lending limit per borrower was approximately $12,340,000.$13,033,000. Accordingly, the size of loans that we may offer to potential borrowers (without participation by other lenders) is less than the size of loans that many of our competitors with larger capitalization are able to offer. Our legal lending limit also impacts the efficiency of our lending operation because it tends to lower our average loan size, which means we have to generate a higher number of transactions to achieve the same portfolio volume. We may engage in loan participations with other banks for loans in excess of our legal lending limit. However, there can be no assurance that such participations will be available or on terms which are favorable to us and our customers.

 

Impairment Risk5) Our results of operations may be adversely affected by other-than-temporary impairment charges relating to our investment portfolio.

QNB purchases U.S. Government and U.S. Government agency debt securities, U.S. Government agency issued mortgage-backed securities or collateralized mortgage obligation securities, obligations of states and municipalities, corporate debt securities and equity securities. QNB is exposed to the risk that the issuers of these securities may experience significant deterioration in credit quality which could impact the market value of the issue. QNB periodically evaluates its investments to determine if market value declines are other-than-temporary. Once a decline is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for the credit related portion of the impairment.

 

The Bank holds sevensix pooled trust preferred securities with an amortized cost of $3,519,000 and a fair value as of December 31, 20132014 of $2,069,000.$2,439,000. All of the trust preferred securities are available-for-sale securities and are carried at fair value. On December 10, 2013, Federal Banking Regulators issued final rules regarding implementation of Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act ("the Volcker Rule") which stated that “a banking entity may not, as principal, directly or indirectly, acquire or retain any ownership interest in or sponsor a covered fund”. The interpretation of the final rules indicated that a very high percentage of pooled trust preferred securities would be considered "covered funds". The rules also required that banks dispose of their covered funds by July 21, 2015, subject to a regulatory extension of up to five years. This would have triggered accounting requirements to record pooled trust preferred securities to fair value through the income statement. As a result of this regulation there were some trades of pooled trust preferred securities during December of 2013. On January 14, 2014, Banking Regulators released a final interim rule authorizing retention of pooled trust preferred securities backed primarily by bank-issued trust preferred securities which included the PreTSLs held by QNB. Due to the uncertainty invoked between the original release of the Volcker Rule and the final interim rule,While there was a noticeable increase in trading activity. However,activity of these instruments in 2014, we believe most of these trades occurred under distress and do not represent trades made in an orderly market. Despite the trades that took place as discussed previously, the market for these securities at December 31, 20132014 was not active and markets for similar securities also are not active. The inactivity was evidenced first by a significant widening of the bid-ask spread in the brokered markets in which pooled trust preferred securities trade and then by a significant decrease in the volume of trades relative to historical levels. The new issue market is also inactive and the market values for these securities are depressed relative to historical levels. Lack of liquidity in the market for trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, credit rating downgrades and market uncertainties related to the financial industry are all factors contributing to the temporary impairment of these securities. Although these securities are classified as available-for-sale, the Company has the intent to hold the securities and does not believe it will be required to sell the securities before recovery occurs. These securities are comprised mainly of securities issued by banks, and to a lesser degree, insurance companies. QNB owns the mezzanine tranches of these securities, except for PreTSL IV and V which representrepresents the senior-most obligation of the trust.

 

- 10 -

On a quarterly basis, we evaluate our debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”), which involves the use of a third-party valuation firm to assist management with the valuation. When evaluating these investments a credit related portion and a non-credit related portion of OTTI are determined. All of the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations held by QNB are rated lower than AA and are measured for OTTI within the scope of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 325 (formerly known as EITF 99-20-1). QNB performs a discounted cash flow analysis on all of its impaired debt securities to determine if the amortized cost basis of an impaired security will be recovered. In determining whether a credit loss exists, QNB uses its best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security and discounts them at the effective yield implicit in the security at the date of acquisition or the prospective yield for those securities with prior OTTI charges. The discounted cash flow analysis is considered to be the primary evidence when determining whether credit related other-than-temporary impairment exists. The credit related portion is recognized in earnings and represents the expected shortfall in future cash flows. The non-credit related portion is recognized in other comprehensive income and represents the difference between the book value and the fair value of the security less any current quarter credit related impairment. During 20132014 and 2012,2013, there were no charges representing the recognition of credit impairments on our investment in pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations.

- 10 -

 

The Company’s investment in marketable equity securities primarily consists of investments in large cap stock companies. These equity securities are analyzed for impairment on an ongoing basis. As a result of declines in some equity values, $43,000 and $105,000 of other-than-temporary impairment charges were taken in 2013 and 2012, respectively.2013. There was no OTTI in the equity securities portfolio in 2014. QNB had threeseven equity securities with unrealized losses of $44,000$70,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. The severity and duration of the impairment is consistent with current stock market developments. Management believes these equity securities in an unrealized loss position will recover in the foreseeable future. QNB evaluated the near-term prospects of the issuers in relation to the severity and duration of the impairment. Based on that evaluation and the Company’s ability and intent to hold those securities for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value, the Company does not consider these equity securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

 

The Bank is a member of the FHLB and is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB in an amount equal to the greater of 1% of its aggregate unpaid residential mortgage loans, home purchase contracts or similar obligations at the beginning of each year or 5% of its outstanding advances from the FHLB. At December 31, 2013,2014, the Bank had $1,752,000$635,000 in stock of the FHLB which was in compliance with this requirement. These equity securities are restricted in that they can only be sold back to the respective institutions or another member institution at par. Therefore, they are less liquid than other tradable equity securities, their fair value is equal to amortized cost, and no impairment write-downs have been recorded on these securities.

 

Risk Related6) Our assets at December 31, 2014 included a deferred tax asset and we may not be able to Deferred Tax Assetrealize the full benefit of that asset.

As of December 31, 2013,2014, QNB had a net deferred tax asset of $5,518,000.$2,925,000. Our ability to realize these tax benefits ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character (ordinary income or capital gains) within the applicable carryback and carryforward periods provided under the tax law. Estimating whether the deferred tax asset will be realized requires us to exercise significant judgment and is inherently uncertain because it requires the prediction of future occurrences. The deferred tax asset may be reduced in the future if estimates of future income or our tax planning strategies do not support the amount of the deferred tax asset. If it is determined in the future that a valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset is necessary, we may incur a charge to earnings resulting and a reduction to regulatory capital for the amount included in any such allowance.

 

Third-Party Risk7) A disruption in components of our business infrastructure resulting from financial or technological difficulties of our third party vendors on which we rely could adversely affect our business.

Third parties provide key components of the business infrastructure such as Internet connections and software platforms and network access. Any disruption in Internet, network access or other voice or data communication services provided by these third parties or any failure of these third parties to handle current or higher volumes of use could adversely affect the ability to deliver products and services to clients and otherwise to conduct business. Technological or financial difficulties of a third-party service provider could adversely affect the business to the extent those difficulties result in the interruption or discontinuation of services provided by that party.

 

Technology Risk8) Our failure to properly or timely utilize effective technologies to deliver our products and services, or a systems failure or breach of network security with respect to our information systems could adversely affect our business.

The market for financial services is increasingly affected by advances in technology, including developments in telecommunications, data processing, computers, automation, Internet-based banking and mobile banking. Our ability to compete successfully in our markets may depend on the extent to which we are able to exploit such technological changes. However, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to properly or timely anticipate or implement such technologies or properly train our staff to use such technologies. Any failure to adapt to new technologies could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

 

In addition, we rely heavily on our information systems to conduct business. Maintaining and protecting those systems is difficult and expensive, as is dealing with any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems, whether due to acts or omissions by us or by a third party and whether intentional or not. Any such failure, interruption or breach could result in failures or disruptions in our customer relationship management or our information systems. The policies, procedures and technical safeguards we have in place to prevent or limit the effect of any failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems may be insufficient to prevent or remedy the effects of any such event. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of our information systems could damage our reputation, cause us to incur additional expenses, result in losses, or subject us to regulatory sanctions or additional regulatory scrutiny, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

 

- 11 -

9) Changes in accounting standards applicable to us could materially impact how we report our financial condition and results of operations.

Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. From time to time the FASB changes the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements.

 

These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in our restating prior period financial statements. Management believes the current financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

Government Regulation10) We are subject to numerous government regulations and Supervisionto examination and supervision by bank regulatory agencies, which could have an adverse impact on our business and operations.

The banking industry is heavily regulated under both Federal and state law. Banking regulations, designed primarily for the safety of depositors, may limit a financial institution’s growth and the return to its investors, by restricting such activities as the payment of dividends, mergers with or acquisitions by other institutions, expansion of branch offices and the offering of securities. QNB is also subject to capitalization guidelines established by Federal law and could be subject to enforcement actions to the extent that its subsidiary bank is found, by regulatory examiners, to be undercapitalized. It is difficult to predict what additional changes, if any, will be made to existing Federal and state legislation and regulations or the effect that such changes may have on QNB’s future business and earnings prospects.

- 11 -

 

In response to the financial crisis that commenced in 2008, Congress has taken actions that are intended to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in financial institutions, and the FDIC has taken actions to increase insurance coverage on deposit accounts. The Dodd-Frank Act provides for the creation of a consumer protection division at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System that will have broad authority to issue regulations governing the services and products we provide consumers. This additional regulation could increase our compliance costs and otherwise adversely impact our operations. That legislation also contains provisions that resulted in higher regulatory capital requirements and, over time, could result in higher loan loss provisions for the Bank, and may increase interest expense due to the ability, beginning in July 2011, to pay interest on all demand deposits.

 

The potential exists for additional Federal or state laws and regulations, or changes in policy, affecting many aspects of our operations, including capital levels, lending and funding practices, and liquidity standards. New laws and regulations may increase our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business and otherwise affect our operations, and may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the markets for and value of our loans and investments, the fees we can charge and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability.

 

11) We are required to pay FDIC Insurance Premiumsinsurance premiums, which could be increased in the future.

Since 2008, higher levels of bank failures have dramatically increased the claims against the deposit insurance fund. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor. These factors have placed additional stress on the deposit insurance fund. In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios of the deposit insurance fund, the FDIC has increased assessment rates of insured institutions, particularly those over $10 billion. The Company is generally unable to control the amount of premiums that the Bank is required to pay for FDIC insurance. If there are additional bank failures, or the cost of resolving prior failures exceeds expectations, the Bank may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently increased levels. These announced increases and any future increases or required prepayments of FDIC insurance premiums may adversely impact the Company’s earnings and financial condition.

 

Internal Controls12) Our disclosure controls and Proceduresprocedures and our internal control over financial reporting may not achieve their intended objectives.

Management diligently reviews and updates its internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed by QNB in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Management believes that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Any undetected circumvention of these controls could have a material adverse impact on QNB’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

- 12 -

 

Attracting13) We may not be able to attract and Retaining Skilled Personnelretain highly qualified personnel to execute our business strategy.

Our success depends upon the ability to attract and retain highly motivated, well-qualified personnel. We face significant competition in the recruitment of qualified employees. Our ability to execute our business strategy and provide high quality service may suffer if we are unable to recruit or retain a sufficient number of qualified employees or if the costs of employee compensation or benefits increase substantially. QNB currently has employment agreements and change of control agreements with five of its senior officers.

 

14)Acts of terrorism and other external events could impact our ability to conduct business.

Financial institutions have been, and continue to be, targets of terrorist threats aimed at compromising operating and communication systems. Such events could cause significant damage, impact the stability of our facilities and result in additional expenses, impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, and result in the loss of revenue. While we have established and regularly test disaster recovery procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition.

- 12 -

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to respond to this item.None.

 

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

QNB Bank and QNB Corp.’s principal office is located at 15 North Third Street, Quakertown, Pennsylvania. QNB Bank conducts business from its principal office and ten other retail offices located in Bucks, Lehigh, and Montgomery counties in Pennsylvania. QNB Bank owns its principal office, three retail locations, its operations facility and a computer facility. QNB Bank leases its remaining seven retail properties. The leases on the properties generally contain renewal options. In management’s opinion, these properties are in good condition and are currently adequate for QNB’s purposes.

 

The following table details QNB Bank’s properties:

 

Location

 

Quakertown, PA - Downtown Office - 15 North Third Street

Owned
    

Quakertown, PA - Towne Bank Center - 320-322 West Broad Street      

Owned
    
 Quakertown, PA - Computer Center - 121 West Broad StreetOwned
    
 Quakertown, PA - Country Square Office - 240 South West End BoulevardLeased
    
 Quakertown, PA - Quakertown Commons Branch - 901 South West End BoulevardLeased
    
 Dublin, PA - Dublin Branch - 161 North Main StreetLeased
    
 Pennsburg, PA - Pennsburg Square Branch - 410-420 Pottstown Avenue Leased
    
 Coopersburg, PA - Coopersburg Branch - 51 South Third StreetOwned
    
 Perkasie, PA - Perkasie Branch - 607 Chestnut StreetOwned
    
 Souderton, PA - Souderton Branch - 750 Route 113Leased
    
 Wescosville, PA - Wescosville Branch - 950 Mill Creek RoadLeased
    
 Colmar, PA - Colmar Branch - 127 Bethlehem PikeOwned
    
 Warminster, PA – Warminster Business Office – 1410 West Street RoadLeased

 

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

Although there are currently no material proceedings to which QNB is the subject, future litigation that arises during the normal course of QNB’s business could be material and have a negative impact on QNB’s earnings. Future litigation also could adversely impact the reputation of QNB in the communities that it serves.

 

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

None.

 

 
- 13 -

 

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Stock Information

QNB common stock is quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board (OTCBB). QNB had approximately 679664 shareholders of record as of February 28, 2014.March 4, 2015.

 

The following table sets forth the high and low bid and ask stock prices for QNB common stock on a quarterly basis during 20132014 and 2012.2013. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

     High      Low  

Cash

dividend 

                     
 

Bid

  

Ask

  

Bid

  

Ask

  

per share

                  

Cash

 
 

High

  

Low

  

dividend

 
 

Bid

  

Ask

  

Bid

  

Ask

  

per share

 

2014

                    

First Quarter

 $26.01  $27.00  $25.15  $25.35  $0.28 

Second Quarter

  26.30   26.68   25.91   26.06   0.28 

Third Quarter

  27.00   28.44   26.09   26.50   0.28 

Fourth Quarter

  28.40   30.00   26.71   27.00   0.28 

2013

                                        

First Quarter

 $25.00  $26.00  $23.00  $23.40  $0.27  $25.00  $26.00  $23.00  $23.40  $0.27 

Second Quarter

  24.85   25.20   24.05   24.10   0.27   24.85   25.20   24.05   24.10   0.27 

Third Quarter

  25.20   25.50   24.10   24.13   0.27   25.20   25.50   24.10   24.13   0.27 

Fourth Quarter

  25.40   26.75   24.15   24.25   0.27   25.40   26.75   24.15   24.25   0.27 

2012

                    

First Quarter

 $25.00  $25.85  $21.20  $21.65  $0.26 

Second Quarter

  25.00   25.99   23.30   24.00   0.26 

Third Quarter

  23.80   24.95   22.11   22.83   0.26 

Fourth Quarter

  24.50   24.95   22.90   23.06   0.26 

 

QNB has traditionally paid quarterly cash dividends on the last Friday of each quarter. The Company expects to continue the practice of paying quarterly cash dividends to its shareholders; however, future dividends are dependent upon future earnings, financial condition, appropriate legal restrictions, and other factors relevant at the time the board of directors considers declaring a dividend. Certain laws restrict the amount of dividends that may be paid to shareholders in any given year. See “Capital“Shareholders’ Equity - Capital Adequacy” sectionincluded in Item 7 of this Form 10-K filing, and Note 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K filing, for theadditional information that discusses and quantifies this regulatory restriction.

 

The following table provides information on repurchases by QNB of its common stock in each month of the quarter ended December 31, 2013.

2014.

Period

 

Total number of

shares purchased

 

Average price

paid per share

 

Total number of

shares purchased

as part of publicly

announced plan

  

Maximum

number of shares

that may yet to be

purchased under

the plan

 

October 1, 20132014 through October 31, 20132014

  - 

N/A

  -   42,117 

November 1, 20132014 through November 30, 20132014

  - 

N/A

  -   42,117 

December 1, 20132014 through December 31, 20132014

  - 

N/A

  -   42,117 

(1)

Transactions are reported as of settlement dates.

(2)

QNB’s current stock repurchase plan was approved by its Board of Directors and announced on January 24, 2008 and subsequently increased on February 9, 2009.

(3)

The total number of shares approved for repurchase under QNB’s current stock repurchase plan is 100,000 as of the filing of this Form 10-K10-K.

(4)

QNB’s current stock repurchase plan has no expiration date.

(5)

QNB has no stock repurchase plan that it has determined to terminate or under which it does not intend to make further purchases.

 

 
- 14 -

 

 

Stock Performance Graph

Set forth below is a performance graph comparing the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on QNB’s common stock with:

the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on stocks included in the NASDAQ Market Index, a broad market index;

the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on the SNL $500M to $1B Bank Index, a group encompassing publicly traded banking companies trading on the NYSE, AMEX, or NASDAQ with assets between $500 million and $1 billion;

the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on the SNL Mid-Atlantic Bank Index, a group encompassing publicly traded banking companies trading on the NYSE, AMEX, or NASDAQ headquartered in Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Puerto Rico.

 

All of these cumulative total returns are computed assuming the reinvestment of dividends at the frequency with which dividends were paid during the applicable years.

 

QNB Corp.

 

Period Ending

Index

12/31/08

12/31/09

12/31/10

12/31/11

12/31/12

12/31/13

QNB Corp.

100.00

102.64

126.83

147.75

162.24

182.90

NASDAQ Composite

100.00

145.36

171.74

170.38

200.63

281.22

SNL Bank $500M-$1B

100.00

95.24

103.96

91.46

117.25

152.05

SNL Mid-Atlantic Bank

100.00

105.27

122.81

92.26

123.59

166.59

Source : SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA

   

 

  

© 2014

      

www.snl.com

      

 
- 15 -

 

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA(in thousands, except share and per share data)

                    

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

 

2009

  

2014

  

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

 

Income and expense

                                        

Interest income

 $30,584  $33,348  $36,217  $36,183  $35,368  $30,670  $30,584  $33,348  $36,217  $36,183 

Interest expense

  5,033   6,448   8,091   10,270   13,667   4,544   5,033   6,448   8,091   10,270 

Net interest income

  25,551   26,900   28,126   25,913   21,701   26,126   25,551   26,900   28,126   25,913 

Provision for loan losses

  400   900   2,700   3,800   4,150   400   400   900   2,700   3,800 

Non-interest income

  5,813   5,409   4,226   4,339   3,885   7,542   5,813   5,409   4,226   4,339 

Non-interest expense

  20,226   19,625   18,296   17,401   16,586   21,626   20,226   19,625   18,296   17,401 

Income before income taxes

  10,738   11,784   11,356   9,051   4,850   11,642   10,738   11,784   11,356   9,051 

Provision for income taxes

  2,346   2,609   2,476   1,834   623   2,644   2,346   2,609   2,476   1,834 

Net income

 $8,392  $9,175  $8,880  $7,217  $4,227  $8,998  $8,392  $9,175  $8,880  $7,217 
                                        

Share and Per Share Data

                                        

Net income - basic

 $2.58  $2.87  $2.82  $2.32  $1.37  $2.73  $2.58  $2.87  $2.82  $2.32 

Net income - diluted

  2.57   2.86   2.81   2.32   1.36   2.72   2.57   2.86   2.81   2.32 

Book value

  23.12   24.05   22.32   19.52   18.24   26.04   23.12   24.05   22.32   19.52 

Cash dividends

  1.08   1.04   1.00   0.96   0.96   1.12   1.08   1.04   1.00   0.96 

Average common shares outstanding - basic

  3,248,397   3,197,204   3,149,752   3,105,565   3,094,624   3,291,939   3,248,397   3,197,204   3,149,752   3,105,565 

Average common shares outstanding - diluted

  3,260,075   3,209,857   3,163,748   3,114,722   3,103,433   3,302,574   3,260,075   3,209,857   3,163,748   3,114,722 
                                        

Balance Sheet at Year-end

                                        

Investment securities available-for sale

 $388,670  $401,502  $348,091  $290,564  $256,862 

Investment securities trading

 $4,207   -   -   -   - 

Investment securities available-for-sale

  375,219  $388,670  $401,502  $348,091  $290,564 

Investment securities held-to-maturity

  146   146   1,327   2,667   3,347   146   146   146   1,327   2,667 

Restricted investment in bank stocks

  1,764   2,244   1,775   2,176   2,291   647   1,764   2,244   1,775   2,176 

Loans held-for-sale

  -   1,616   935   228   534   380   -   1,616   935   228 

Loans receivable

  501,716   477,733   489,936   482,182   449,421   555,282   501,716   477,733   489,936   482,182 

Allowance for loan losses

  (8,925)  (9,772)  (9,241)  (8,955)  (6,217)  (8,001)  (8,925)  (9,772)  (9,241)  (8,955)

Other earning assets

  3,569   594   819   6,414   22,158   7,143   3,569   594   819   6,414 

Total assets

  932,883   919,874   868,804   809,260   762,426   977,135   932,883   919,874   868,804   809,260 

Deposits

  814,532   801,638   750,712   694,977   634,103   851,592   814,532   801,638   750,712   694,977 

Borrowed funds

  40,156   37,775   44,320   50,094   63,433   35,189   40,156   37,775   44,320   50,094 

Shareholders' equity

  75,625   77,623   70,841   61,090   56,426   86,354   75,625   77,623   70,841   61,090 
                                        

Selected Financial Ratios

                                        

Net interest margin

  3.09%  3.36%  3.72%  3.72%  3.42%  3.07%  3.09%  3.36%  3.72%  3.72%

Net income as a percentage of:

                                        

Average total assets

  0.91   1.03   1.06   0.93   0.59   0.95   0.91   1.03   1.06   0.93 

Average shareholders' equity

  10.95   13.07   13.99   12.53   7.73   10.89   10.95   13.07   13.99   12.53 

Average shareholders' equity to average total assets

  8.30   7.86   7.55   7.42   7.70   8.72   8.30   7.86   7.55   7.42 

Dividend payout ratio

  41.81   36.25   35.48   41.32   70.31   40.99   41.81   36.25   35.48   41.32 

 

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Results of Operations – Overview

QNB Corp. (“QNB” or the “Company”) earns its net income primarily through its subsidiary, QNB Bank (the “Bank”). Net interest income, or the spread between the interest, dividends and fees earned on loans and investment securities and the expense incurred on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities, is the primary source of operating income for QNB. QNB seeks to achieve sustainable and consistent earnings growth while maintaining adequate levels of capital and liquidity and limiting its exposure to credit and interest rate risk levels approved by the Board of Directors. Due to its limited geographic area, comprised principally of Bucks, Lehigh and Montgomery counties, growth is pursued through expansion of existing customer relationships and building new relationships by stressing a consistent high level of service at all points of contact.

 

 
- 16 -

 

 

Tabular information presented throughout management’s discussion and analysis, other than share and per share data, is presented in thousands of dollars.

 

Net income for the year ended December 31, 20132014 was $8,392,000,$8,998,000, or $2.57$2.72 per share on a diluted basis. This compares to 20122013 net income of $9,175,000,$8,392,000, or $2.86$2.57 per share on a diluted basis. Two important measures of profitability in the banking industry are an institution’s return on average assets and return on average shareholders’ equity. Return on average assets was 0.95% and 0.91% in 2014 and 1.03% in 2013, and 2012, respectively, and return on average shareholders’ equity was 10.95%10.89% and 13.07%10.95%, respectively, during those same periods.

 

20132014 versus 20122013

 

The results for 20132014 include the following significant components:

 

Net interest income decreased $1,349,000,increased $575,000, or 5.0%2.3%, to $25,551,000$26,126,000 for 2013.

Average earning assets increased $27,570,000, or 3.2%, to $890,282,000 for 2013 with average loans increasing $2,050,000, or 0.4%, to $482,922,000, and average investment securities increasing $27,032,000, or 7.4%, to $394,423,000. Although loan demand increased somewhat at the end of 2013, political, tax and fiscal uncertainty continues to impact consumer and business loan demand.2014.

Funding the growth in earning assets was an increase in average total deposits of $23,055,000, or 2.9%, to $808,839,000 for 2013. The growth in deposits was primarily in interest-bearing municipal accounts with the average balance increasing by $31,850,000 to $104,314,000. Also contributing to the growth in average total deposits was an increase in average savings accounts, in particular the Online eSavings product, with average savings balances increasing by $13,337,000, or 7.1%, to $202,053,000 and an increase in interest-bearing demand accounts of $11,032,000, or 11.2%, to $109,383,000. These increases were partially offset by a $27,911,000, or 9.9%, decline in average time deposit balances to $253,961,000 and an $11,525,000, or 14.9%, decrease in average money market deposits to $65,744,000.

The chart below details the highs and lows of certain Treasury rates during the year as well as a comparison of rates at year-end 2013 and 2012. Interest rates on Treasury securities reached historically low levels during the second quarter of 2012 and then began to rise with significant increases in mid-term and long-term treasury rates beginning in June 2013. The result is a much steeper yield curve.

  

December 31,

 

Low

 

High

  

2013

 

2012

 

during 2013

 

during 2013

3 month Treasury

  0.06%  0.04%  0.00%    0.14%

2 year Treasury

  0.38   0.25   0.20   0.52 

5 year Treasury

  1.73   0.72   0.65   1.85 

10 year Treasury

  3.01   1.76   1.66   3.04 

The net interest margin for 2013 was 3.09%,on a decrease of 27tax-equivalent basis decreased two basis points to 3.07% for 2014 from the 3.36% reported in 2012. The net interest margin and net interest income was negatively impacted by declining yields on earning assets resulting from the prolonged low interest rate environment. In addition, with the growth in earning assets occurring primarily in the investment portfolio, the mix of earning assets changed impacting the yield on earning assets and the net interest margin, as investment securities generally earn a lower yield than loans. The average rate earned on earning assets declined 45 basis points from 4.11%3.09% for 2012 to 3.66% for 2013 with the yield on loans and investment securities declining by 47 basis points and 40 basis points, respectively. In comparison, the interest rate paid on total average interest-bearing liabilities declined by 21 basis points from 0.86% for 2012 to 0.65% for 2013 with the average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits declining 18 basis points from 0.82% to 0.64% over the same time period.2013.

QNB recorded a provision for loan losses of $400,000 for 2013, a decreaseboth 2014 and 2013.

Non-interest income for 2014 was $7,542,000, an increase of $500,000$1,729,000, or 29.7%, compared to 2013. Non-interest expense for 2014 was $21,626,000, an increase of $1,400,000, or 6.9%, compared to 2013.

Loans receivable grew $53,566,000, or 10.7%, from the $900,000 recorded in 2012.December 31, 2013. Deposits increased $37,060,000, or 4.5%, from December 31, 2013.     

•     

The lower provision for loan losses reflects a reduction in classified and non-performing loans, an improvement in delinquency levels and a reduction in required specific impairment reserves.     

Asset quality has improved over the past year. Total non-performing loans, which represent loans on non-accrual status, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, and restructured loans, were $15,414,000, or 3.07% of total loans at December 31, 2013, compared to $21,150,000, or 4.43% of total loans at December 31, 2012.

Loans on nonaccrual status were $13,453,000 at December 31, 2013 compared with $18,572,000 at December 31, 2012. Of the total amount of non-accrual loans at December 31, 2013, $11,126,000, or 82.7%, are current or past due less than 30 days at year end.

Total delinquent loans, which includes loans past due 3090 days or more decreased to 1.07%and still accruing interest, and restructured loans, were $12,667,000, or 2.28% of total loans at December 31, 2013 from 1.50%2014, compared to $15,413,000, or 3.07% of total loans at December 31, 2012.

At2013. Loans on non-accrual status were $10,770,000 at December 31, 2013 commercial classified loans, those rated substandard or doubtful loans totaled $38,823,000, a reduction of $6,691,000 from the $45,514,000 reported as of2014 compared with $13,453,000 at December 31, 2012.

2013. Net charge-offs for 20132014 were $1,324,000, or 0.25% of average total loans, as compared with $1,247,000, or 0.26% of average total loans as compared with $369,000, or 0.08% of average total loans for 2012.

The allowance for loan losses of $8,925,000 represents 1.78% of total loans at December 31, 2013 compared to $9,772,000, or 2.05% of total loans at December 31, 2012.

- 17 -

Non-interest income increased $404,000 to $5,813,000 for 2013.

Net gain on investment securities of $824,000 in 2013 contributed an additional $247,000 compared with net gains of $577,000 in 2012.

Retail brokerage and advisory income was $523,000 for 2013 compared to $39,000 in 2012. During the fourth quarter of 2012, QNB changed vendors and now provides securities and advisory services under the name of QNB Financial Services through Investment Professionals, Inc., a registered Broker/Dealer and Registered Investment Advisor.

Fees for services to customers increased $118,000, or 8.0%, to $1,594,000 in 2013 with overdraft income net of waived fees comprising the largest portion.

Gains on the sale of residential mortgages decreased $460,000 to $425,000 for 2013. A significant increase in mid-term and long-term treasury rates beginning in mid-2013 was a key contributor to the lower gains recorded as mortgage refinance activity slowed significantly and the gain realized on each sale was reduced. During 2012, historically low mortgage rates contributed significantly to the level of refinancing activity as well as an increase in the amount of gain recorded per sale.

Non-interest expense increased $601,000, or 3.1%, to $20,226,000 for 2013.

Salary expense for 2013 increased $104,000, or 1.2%, to $8,436,000. There was no incentive compensation during 2013; however, 2012 included incentive compensation of $439,000. Excluding the cost of incentive compensation, salary expense increased $543,000, or 6.9%, when comparing 2013 to 2012. Contributing to the increase in salary expense was the addition of ten full-time equivalent employees. The increase in employees was primarily related to the opening of two new branch locations in the first quarter of 2013 as well as two commissioned employees related to QNB Financial Services.

Furniture and equipment expense increased $211,000, or 14.0%, to $1,714,000, when comparing 2013 to 2012. The majority of the increase in this category related to an increase in depreciation expense on new furniture and equipment related to the opening of two new branch locations as well as amortization expense on computer software. Also contributing to the higher costs in 2013 was equipment maintenance expense.

Marketing expense increased $142,000, or 17.1%, from the $829,000 recorded in 2012. Due to the opening of the two new branch locations and the introduction of QNB Financial Services, marketing expenses related to advertising, public relations, research and sales promotion were $80,000 higher for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012. An increase in charitable contributions of $62,000 also contributed to the increase.

 

These items, as well as others, will be explained more thoroughly in the next sections.

 

 

Net Interest Income

The following table presents the adjustment to convert net interest income to net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.

        

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Total interest income

 $30,584  $33,348  $30,670  $30,584 

Total interest expense

  5,033   6,448   4,544   5,033 

Net interest income

  25,551   26,900   26,126   25,551 

Tax equivalent adjustment

  1,963   2,116   1,903   1,963 

Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis)

 $27,514  $29,016  $28,029  $27,514 

 

Net interest income is the primary source of operating income for QNB. Net interest income is interest income, dividends, and fees on earning assets, less interest expense incurred for funding sources. Earning assets primarily include loans, investment securities and interest bearing balances at the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed). Sources used to fund these assets include deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates, the volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the amount of earning assets funded by non-interest bearing deposits.

 

For purposes of this discussion, interest income and the average yield earned on loans and investment securities are adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis as detailed in the table that appears above. This adjustment to interest income is made for analysis purposes only. Interest income is increased by the amount of savings of Federal income taxes, which QNB realizes by investing in certain tax-exempt state and municipal securities and by making loans to certain tax-exempt organizations. In this way, the ultimate economic impact of earnings from various assets can be more easily compared.

 

The net interest rate spread is the difference between average rates received on earning assets and average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, while the net interest margin, which includes interest-free sources of funds, is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. The Asset/Liability and Investment Management Committee works to manage and maximize the net interest margin for the Company.

 

Net interest income decreased $1,349,000,increased $575,000, or 5.0%2.3%, to $25,551,000$26,126,000 for 2013.2014. On a tax-equivalent basis, net interest income for 2013 decreased $1,502,000,2014 increased $515,000, or 5.2%1.9%, to $27,514,000.$28,029,000. The net interest margin for 20132014 was 3.09%3.07% compared to 3.36%3.09% for 2012.2013. The net interest margin was negatively impacted by declining yields on earning assets resulting from the prolonged low interest rate environment. The average rate earned on earning assets declined nine basis points from 3.66% for 2013 to 3.57% for 2014 with the yield on loans declining by 26 basis points while the yield on investment securities increased one basis point. In comparison, the interest rate paid on total average interest-bearing liabilities declined by seven basis points from 0.65% for 2013 to 0.58% for 2014 with the average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits declining six basis points from 0.64% to 0.58% over the same time period.

 

 
- 1817 -

 

 

Average Balances, Rates,The chart below details the highs and Interest Incomelows of certain Treasury rates during the year as well as a comparison of rates at year-end 2014 and Expense Summary(Tax-Equivalent Basis)

  

2013

  

2012

  

2011

 
  

Average

  

Average

      

Average

  

Average

      

Average

  

Average

     
  

balance

  

rate

  

Interest

  

balance

  

rate

  

Interest

  

balance

  

rate

  

Interest

 

Assets

                                    

Investment securities:

                                    

U.S. Government agencies

 $82,378   1.28% $1,057  $80,470   1.42% $1,144  $63,838   2.12% $1,356 

State and municipal

  86,920   4.68   4,064   79,612   5.36   4,267   71,541   5.82   4,164 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  213,303   2.05   4,370   197,666   2.44   4,813   175,489   3.14   5,503 

Pooled trust preferred

  3,519   0.18   6   3,573   0.36   13   3,640   0.21   7 

Corporate debt

  4,221   1.86   79   2,457   4.07   100   878   6.26   55 

Equities

  4,082   3.28   134   3,613   4.25   153   3,278   3.67   120 

Total investment securities

  394,423   2.46   9,710   367,391   2.86   10,490   318,664   3.52   11,205 

Loans:

                                    

Commercial real estate

  251,037   4.86   12,198   253,029   5.30   13,398   261,584   5.82   15,216 

Residential real estate

  28,696   4.48   1,285   27,708   4.99   1,383   24,414   5.36   1,307 

Home equity loans

  52,418   4.06   2,131   51,158   4.40   2,253   55,086   4.72   2,598 

Commercial and industrial

  105,470   4.26   4,493   101,421   4.67   4,733   88,428   5.06   4,474 

Indirect lease financing

  9,261   9.90   916   11,282   9.88   1,115   13,067   9.32   1,218 

Consumer loans

  2,372   6.43   152   2,175   10.08   219   2,491   14.21   354 

Tax-exempt loans

  33,668   4.80   1,615   34,099   5.38   1,834   32,051   5.91   1,895 

Total loans, net of unearned income*

  482,922   4.72   22,790   480,872   5.19   24,935   477,121   5.67   27,062 

Other earning assets

  12,937   0.37   47   14,449   0.27   39   16,989   0.24   41 

Total earning assets

  890,282   3.66   32,547   862,712   4.11   35,464   812,774   4.71   38,308 

Cash and due from banks

  11,473           11,151           10,460         

Allowance for loan losses

  (9,308)          (9,582)          (9,080)        

Other assets

  30,741           29,195           26,749         

Total assets

 $923,188          $893,476          $840,903         
                                     

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

                                    

Interest-bearing deposits:

                                    

Interest-bearing demand

 $109,383   0.24% $260  $98,351   0.30% $291  $87,886   0.47% $412 

Municipals

  104,314   0.37   389   72,464   0.50   364   56,808   0.69   392 

Money market

  65,744   0.20   133   77,269   0.30   231   73,661   0.43   317 

Savings

  202,053   0.41   820   188,716   0.60   1,141   152,203   0.78   1,184 

Time

  162,837   1.16   1,882   180,293   1.33   2,391   192,231   1.55   2,977 

Time of $100,000 or more

  91,124   1.31   1,189   101,579   1.43   1,454   101,917   1.61   1,637 

Total interest-bearing deposits

  735,455   0.64   4,673   718,672   0.82   5,872   664,706   1.04   6,919 

Short-term borrowings

  29,743   0.37   111   24,847   0.44   109   25,806   0.75   194 

Long-term debt

  5,174   4.75   249   9,678   4.75   467   20,304   4.75   978 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  770,372   0.65   5,033   753,197   0.86   6,448   710,816   1.14   8,091 

Non-interest-bearing deposits

  73,384           67,112           63,651         

Other liabilities

  2,769           2,971           2,972         

Shareholders' equity

  76,663           70,196           63,464         

Total liabilities andshareholders' equity

 $923,188          $893,476          $840,903         

Net interest rate spread

      3.01%          3.25%          3.57%    

Margin/net interest income

      3.09% $27,514       3.36% $29,016       3.72% $30,217 

Tax-exempt securities2013. In 2014, the Treasury yield curve flattened, with the 10 year rate declining 84 basis points and loans were adjusted tothe two year climbed 29 basis points. While still upward-sloping, a tax-equivalent basisflatter yield curve provides decreasing spreads between earning asset yields and are based on the marginal Federal corporate tax rate of 34 percent.funding costs. 

Non-accrual loans and investment securities are included in earning assets.

* Includes loans held-for-sale

 

- 19 -

Rate-Volume Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income(1) (2) (3)

  

2013 vs. 2012

  

2012 vs. 2011

 
  

Due to change in:

  

Total

  

Due to change in:

  

Total

 
  

Volume

  

Rate

  

Change

  

Volume

  

Rate

  

Change

 

Interest income:

                        

Investment securities:

                        

U.S. Government agencies

 $27  $(114) $(87) $354  $(566) $(212)

State and municipal

  392   (595)  (203)  470   (367)  103 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  381   (824)  (443)  694   (1,384)  (690)

Pooled trust preferred

  (1)  (6)  (7)  -   6   6 

Corporate debt

  72   (93)  (21)  99   (54)  45 

Equities

  20   (39)  (19)  12   21   33 

Loans:

                        

Commercial real estate

  (105)  (1,095)  (1,200)  (498)  (1,320)  (1,818)

Residential real estate

  50   (148)  (98)  177   (101)  76 

Home equity loans

  56   (178)  (122)  (185)  (160)  (345)

Commercial and industrial

  189   (429)  (240)  657   (398)  259 

Indirect lease financing

  (200)  1   (199)  (166)  63   (103)

Consumer loans

  20   (87)  (67)  (45)  (90)  (135)

Tax-exempt loans

  (23)  (196)  (219)  121   (182)  (61)

Other earning assets

  (4)  12   8   (7)  5   (2)

Total interest income

  874   (3,791)  (2,917)  1,683   (4,527)  (2,844)

Interest expense:

                        

Interest-bearing demand

  32   (63)  (31)  49   (170)  (121)

Municipals

  160   (135)  25   108   (136)  (28)

Money market

  (34)  (64)  (98)  15   (101)  (86)

Savings

  81   (402)  (321)  284   (327)  (43)

Time

  (231)  (278)  (509)  (185)  (401)  (586)

Time of $100,000 or more

  (150)  (115)  (265)  (5)  (178)  (183)

Short-term borrowings

  22   (20)  2   (7)  (78)  (85)

Long-term debt

  (218)  -   (218)  (511)  -   (511)

Total interest expense

  (338)  (1,077)  (1,415)  (252)  (1,391)  (1,643)

Net interest income

 $1,212  $(2,714) $(1,502) $1,935  $(3,136) $(1,201)

(1)

Loan fees have been included in the change in interest income totals presented. Non-accrual loans and investment securities have been included in average balances.

(2)

Changes due to both volume and rates have been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the dollar amount change in each.

(3)

Interest income on loans and securities is presented on a tax-equivalent basis.

 

Net interest income and net interest margin continue to be negatively impacted by declining yields on earning assets resulting from the prolonged low interest rate environment that banks have been operating in since 2008, the beginning of the financial crisis. During the beginning of this interest rate cycle, funding costs declined at a faster pace and to a greater degree than rates on earning assets resulting in an increasing net interest margin. However, since the second quarter of 2011 this trend has reversed as funding costs have approached bottom while yields on earning assets continue to reprice lower resulting in a decline in the net interest margin. While improving, the lack of demand for loans by both businesses and consumers and the extremelyThe competitive local interest rate market for quality loans has also negatively impacted net interest income and net interest margin. Partially offsetting the impact of declining yields on earning assets on net interest income was growth in earning assets, primarily investment securities.loans. Average earning assets increased by $27,570,000,$22,544,000, or 3.2%2.5%, to $890,282,000$912,826,000 for 2013,2014, with average loans increasing $41,205,000, or 8.5%, to $524,127,000, while average investment securities increasing $27,032,000,decreased $31,219,000, or 7.4%7.9%, to $394,423,000, and average loans increasing $2,050,000, or 0.4%, to $482,922,000. However;$363,204,000. However, with the growth in earning assets occurring primarily in the investmentloan portfolio, the mix of earning assets changed which also contributed to a decline inrelative stability of the yield on earning assets and net interest margin, as investment securities generally earn a lower yield than loans. ThisThe growth in earning assetsloans was primarilyalso funded by a $23,055,000,$20,245,000, or 2.9%2.5%, increase in average total deposits to $808,839,000. The increase$829,084,000. All categories of deposits experienced increases in average deposits was centeredbalances in municipal deposits, savings2014, with the exception of Money market balances and interest-bearing demandtime deposits.

- 18 -

Average Balances, Rates, and Interest Income and Expense Summary(Tax-Equivalent Basis)

  2014  2013  2012        
  

Average

  

Average

      

Average

  

Average

      

Average

  

Average

     
  

balance

  

rate

  

Interest

  

balance

  

rate

  

Interest

  

balance

  

rate

  

Interest

 

Assets

                                    

Trading securities

 $4,064   5.87% $239   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Investment securities (AFS & HTM):

                                    

U.S. Government agencies

  60,080   1.52   915  $82,378   1.28% $1,057  $80,470   1.42% $1,144 

State and municipal

  77,153   4.36   3,367   86,920   4.68   4,064   79,612   5.36   4,267 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  210,336   2.03   4,276   213,303   2.05   4,370   197,666   2.44   4,813 

Pooled trust preferred

  3,519   0.17   6   3,519   0.18   6   3,573   0.36   13 

Corporate debt

  6,008   1.12   67   4,221   1.86   79   2,457   4.07   100 

Equities

  6,108   3.17   193   4,082   3.28   134   3,613   4.25   153 

Total investment securities

  363,204   2.43   8,824   394,423   2.46   9,710   367,391   2.86   10,490 

Loans:

                                    

Commercial real estate

  265,512   4.55   12,084   251,037   4.86   12,198   253,029   5.30   13,398 

Residential real estate

  34,123   4.21   1,436   28,696   4.48   1,285   27,708   4.99   1,383 

Home equity loans

  56,249   3.78   2,125   52,418   4.06   2,131   51,158   4.40   2,253 

Commercial and industrial

  113,155   4.35   4,921   105,470   4.26   4,493   101,421   4.67   4,733 

Indirect lease financing

  7,779   9.95   774   9,261   9.90   916   11,282   9.88   1,115 

Consumer loans

  3,749   5.60   210   2,372   6.43   152   2,175   10.08   219 

Tax-exempt loans

  43,560   4.21   1,834   33,668   4.80   1,615   34,099   5.38   1,834 

Total loans, net of unearned income*

  524,127   4.46   23,384   482,922   4.72   22,790   480,872   5.19   24,935 

Other earning assets

  21,431   0.59   126   12,937   0.37   47   14,449   0.27   39 

Total earning assets

  912,826   3.57   32,573   890,282   3.66   32,547   862,712   4.11   35,464 

Cash and due from banks

  11,621           11,473           11,151         

Allowance for loan losses

  (8,672)          (9,308)          (9,582)        

Other assets

  32,089           30,741           29,195         

Total assets

 $947,864          $923,188          $893,476         
                                     

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

                                    

Interest-bearing deposits:

                                    

Interest-bearing demand

 $118,631   0.23% $274  $109,383   0.24% $260  $98,351   0.30% $291 

Municipals

  120,540   0.33   399   104,314   0.37   389   72,464   0.50   364 

Money market

  58,333   0.22   126   65,744   0.20   133   77,269   0.30   231 

Savings

  208,629   0.37   770   202,053   0.41   820   188,716   0.60   1,141 

Time

  151,002   1.08   1,636   162,837   1.16   1,882   180,293   1.33   2,391 

Time of $100,000 or more

  91,522   1.26   1,155   91,124   1.31   1,189   101,579   1.43   1,454 

Total interest-bearing deposits

  748,657   0.58   4,360   735,455   0.64   4,673   718,672   0.82   5,872 

Short-term borrowings

  31,616   0.36   114   29,743   0.37   111   24,847   0.44   109 

Long-term debt

  1,452   4.76   70   5,174   4.75   249   9,678   4.75   467 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  781,725   0.58   4,544   770,372   0.65   5,033   753,197   0.86   6,448 

Non-interest-bearing deposits

  80,427           73,384           67,112         

Other liabilities

  3,089           2,769           2,971         

Shareholders' equity

  82,623           76,663           70,196         

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $947,864          $923,188          $893,476         

Net interest rate spread

      2.99%          3.01%          3.25%    

Margin/net interest income

      3.07% $28,029       3.09% $27,514       3.36% $29,016 

Tax-exempt securities and loans were adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis and are based on the marginal Federal corporate tax rate of 34 percent.

Non-accrual loans and investment securities are included in earning assets.

* Includes loans held-for-sale

- 19 -

Rate-Volume Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income(1) (2) (3)

  

2014 vs. 2013

  

2013 vs. 2012

 
  

Due to change in:

  

Total

  

Due to change in:

  

Total

 
  

Volume

  

Rate

  

Change

  

Volume

  

Rate

  

Change

 

Interest income:

                        

Trading securities

 $239   -  $239   -   -   - 

Investment securities (AFS & HTM):

                        

U.S. Government agencies

  (286) $144   (142) $27  $(114) $(87)

State and municipal

  (457)  (240)  (697)  392   (595)  (203)

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  (60)  (34)  (94)  381   (824)  (443)

Pooled trust preferred

  -   -   -   (1)  (6)  (7)

Corporate debt

  33   (45)  (12)  72   (93)  (21)

Equities

  66   (7)  59   20   (39)  (19)

Total investment securities (AFS & HTM)

  (704)  (182)  (886)  891   (1,671)  (780)

Loans:

                        

Commercial real estate

  703   (817)  (114)  (105)  (1,095)  (1,200)

Residential real estate

  242   (91)  151   50   (148)  (98)

Home equity loans

  155   (161)  (6)  56   (178)  (122)

Commercial and industrial

  327   101   428   189   (429)  (240)

Indirect lease financing

  (146)  4   (142)  (200)  1   (199)

Consumer loans

  89   (31)  58   20   (87)  (67)

Tax-exempt loans

  475   (256)  219   (23)  (196)  (219)

Total loans

  1,845   (1,251)  594   (13)  (2,132)  (2,145)

Other earning assets

  32   47   79   (4)  12   8 

Total interest income

  1,412   (1,386)  26   874   (3,791)  (2,917)

Interest expense:

                        

Interest-bearing demand

  22   (8)  14   32   (63)  (31)

Municipals

  61   (51)  10   160   (135)  25 

Money market

  (15)  8   (7)  (34)  (64)  (98)

Savings

  26   (76)  (50)  81   (402)  (321)

Time

  (136)  (110)  (246)  (231)  (278)  (509)

Time of $100,000 or more

  6   (40)  (34)  (150)  (115)  (265)

Total interest-bearing deposits

  (36)  (277)  (313)  (142)  (1,057)  (1,199)

Short-term borrowings

  6   (3)  3   22   (20)  2 

Long-term debt

  (179)  -   (179)  (218)  -   (218)

Total interest expense

  (209)  (280)  (489)  (338)  (1,077)  (1,415)

Net interest income

 $1,621  $(1,106) $515  $1,212  $(2,714) $(1,502)

(1)

Loan fees have been included in the change in interest income totals presented. Non-accrual loans and investment securities have been included in average balances.

(2)

Changes due to both volume and rates have been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the dollar amount change in each.

(3)

Interest income on loans and securities is presented on a tax-equivalent basis.

 

The Rate-Volume Analysis tables, as presented on a tax-equivalent basis, highlight the impact of changing rates and volumes on interest income and interest expense. Total interest income on a tax-equivalent basis decreased $2,917,000, or 8.2%,increased $26,000 to $32,547,000$32,573,000 for 2013,2014, while total interest expense decreased $1,415,000,$489,000, or 21.9%9.7%, to $5,033,000.$4,544,000. Volume growth in earning assets contributed an additional $874,000$1,412,000 of interest income butwhich was offset in part by a decline in interest income of $3,791,000$1,386,000 resulting from lower interest rates. With regard to interest expense, lower funding costs resulted in a decline in interest expense of $1,077,000.$280,000. The maturity and payoff of long-term debt in April 20122014 contributed to a decline in interest expense of $218,000$179,000 when comparing the two years.

- 20 -

 

The yield on earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis decreased 45nine basis points from 4.11% for 2012 to 3.66% for 2013.2013 to 3.57% for 2014. The long period of historically low interest rates has resulted in a significant amount of higher yielding bonds with call features being called and prepayments on mortgage-related securities increasing, with these proceeds being reinvested in lower yielding investment securities. In addition, new loans are being originated at significantly lower rates, variable rate loans are repricing lower and some fixed rate loans are being modified lower due to competitive pressure.

 

In comparison, the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased only 21seven basis points from 0.86% for 2012 to 0.65% for 2013 to 0.58% for 2014 with the rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreasing 18six basis points from 0.82% for 2012 to 0.64% for 2013.2013 to 0.58% for 2014.

- 20 -

 

Interest income on trading, available-for-sale, and held-to-maturity investment securities decreased $780,000$647,000 when comparing the two years as the $27,032,000, or 7.4%, increaseyears. The $27,155,000 decrease in average balances could not offset the 40 basis point decline in the average yieldcontributed to $465,000 of the portfolio. Thedecrease, while falling rates contributed the remaining $182,000 decline. Although interest income decreased, the average yield on the investment portfolio wasincreased one basis point from 2.46% for 2013 comparedto 2.47% for 2014. This is due in part to the establishment of a trading account consisting of municipal securities with 2.86% for 2012.an average balance of $4,064,000 in 2014 and an average rate of return of 5.87%. The declinedecrease in the yield on the investment portfolio is primarily the result of the reinvestment of the cash flow resulting from the low rate environment intodue to lower yield securities than those they replaced. The yield on theyielding investment portfolio seemsopportunities in 2014 compared to have stabilized as the increase in Treasury rates since the end of the second quarter has slowed down the amount of calls and prepayments in the portfolio and has also provided an opportunity to invest in bonds with slightly better yields than previously available. The growth in the investment portfolio was primarily in high-quality U.S. Government agency and agency issued mortgage-backed and CMO securitiesprevious periods, as well as in tax-exempt state and municipal bonds.higher demand for loans.

 

Income on Government agency securities decreased $87,000,$142,000, even as the yield on the portfolio declinedincreased by 1424 basis points from 1.42% for 2012 to 1.28% for 2013. The 2.4% increase2013 to 1.52% for 2014, as investments in average balances could not offset the impact of the decline in yield.this sector had slightly better yields than previously available. Most of the bonds in the agency portfolio have call features ranging from three months to three years, many of which were exercised as a result of the low interest rate environment. The yield on the agency portfolio is anticipated to increase in 2014 as a result of selling some lower yielding bonds at the end of 2013 as well as the investment of cash into bonds with yields higher than the portfolio yield.

 

Interest income on tax-exempt municipal securities decreased $203,000 as$697,000. Average balances, which declined $9,767,000, or 11.2%, contributed $457,000 to the $7,308,000, or 9.2%, growthdecrease in average balances was offset by a 68interest income and the 32 basis point decline in yield. The yield onfrom 4.68% in 2013 to 4.36% in 2014 contributed the municipal portfolio was 4.68% for 2013 compared to 5.36% for 2012. The increase in balances contributed an additional $392,000remaining $240,000 reduction in interest income while the decline in yield reduced interest income by $595,000.income. QNB had purchased many municipal securities when rates were significantly higher. Many of these bonds have either reached maturity or their call dates and are being replaced with municipal bonds with lower yields. Typically QNB purchased municipal bonds with 10-15 year maturities; however, given the current rate environment has shortened the maturity range to between 5-7 years with call dates between 2-4 years. The yield on this portfolio is expected to continue to decline as there are $9,003,000$15,800,000 in municipal bonds with a tax-equivalent yield of 5.71%4.38% that are expected to be called or mature in 2014.2015. The current yield on replacement bonds is well below this threshold.

 

All of the mortgage-backed and CMOcollateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”) securities owned by QNB are issued by U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and carry the implicit backing of the U.S. Government, but they are not direct obligations of the U.S. Government. Interest income on mortgage-backed securities and CMOs decreased $443,000$94,000 with an increasea small decrease in average balances offsetting in partas well as lower rates contributing to the significant impact of lower rates.decline. Average balances increased $15,637,000,decreased $2,967,000, or 7.9%1.4%, to $213,303,000$210,336,000 when comparing the two years, and contributed $381,000resulting in additionala $60,000 decline in interest income. The yield on the mortgage-backed and CMO portfolio decreased 39two basis points from 2.44% for 2012 to 2.05% for 2013 to 2.03% for 2014, resulting in a $824,000$34,000 reduction in interest income. This portfolio was expanded because it provides higher yields relative to agency bonds and also provides monthly cash flow which can be used for liquidity purposes or can be reinvested when interest rates eventually increase. With the historically low interest rate environment mortgage refinancing activity over the past three years was significant resulting in an increase in prepayments on these securities. Since most of these securities were purchased at a premium, prepayments result in a shorter amortization period of this premium and therefore a reduction in income. With the increase in interest rates, mortgage prepayments have slowed and yields have increased slightly.

Income on loans decreased $2,145,000 to $22,790,000 when comparing 2013 and 2012 with the decline in the portfolio yield being the primary reason. The yield on the loan portfolio decreased 47 basis points to 4.72% when comparing the two years, resulting in a reduction in interest income of $2,132,000. When comparing the two years average loans increased $2,050,000, or 0.4%, to $482,922,000 for 2013. As a result of the decline in market rates and an increase in competition for quality loans, QNB lowered the rates offered on new loans and reduced rates on some existing loans. In addition, QNB has been aggressively promoting home equity and consumer loans with very competitive interest rates.

 

The largest category of the loan portfolio is commercial real estate loans. This category of loans includes commercial purpose loans secured by either commercial properties such as office buildings, factories, warehouses, medical facilities and retail establishments, or residential real estate, usually the residence of the business owner or investment properties. The category also includes construction and land development loans. Income on commercial real estate loans decreased $1,200,000 and$114,000. The increase in average balances of $14,475,000 or 5.8%, contributed an increase in interest income of $703,000. This was impactedoffset by both thea 31 basis point decline in yield, and a decreasefrom 4.86% in average balances. The yield on commercial real estate loans was 4.86% for 2013 to 4.55% in 2014, which resulted in a decrease of 44 basis points from the 5.30% reported for 2012 and resulted in a $1,095,000 reduction in interest income. Average balances decreased $1,992,000, or 0.8%, to $251,037,000, for 2013 compared with 2012 resulting in an additional $105,000 reduction in interest income. income of $817,000.

- 21 -

 

Income on commercial and industrial loans, the second largest category, decreased $240,000increased $428,000 with the positive impact from growth in balances being offset by the decline in theas well as improved yield. Average commercial and industrial loans increased $4,049,000,$7,685,000, or 4.0%7.3%, to $105,470,000$113,155,000 for 2013,2014, providing an additional $189,000$327,000 in interest income. However, the averageAverage yield on these loans decreased 41increased nine basis points to 4.26%4.35% resulting in a decreasean increase in interest income of $429,000. Many of the loans in this category are indexed to the prime interest rate and have floors. The improvement in the yield on this category of loans will be highly dependent upon actions by the Fed.$101,000.

 

Tax-exempt loan income was $1,615,000$1,834,000 for 2013, a decrease2014, an increase of $219,000 from 2012.2013. When comparing the same periods average balances increased 29.4% to $43,560,000, which contributed a $475,000 increase in interest income. With the decline in market interest rates QNB has renegotiated and rebid on many loans to municipalities over the past twoseveral years. As a result, the average yield on the tax-exempt loan portfolio has declined from 5.38% for 2012 to 4.80% for 2103, contributing $196,0002013 to the decline4.21% for 2014, resulting in decreased interest income of $256,000.The increase in volume related interest income of $475,000 partially offset the yield decrease when comparing the two years. When comparing the same periods average balances decreased 1.3% to $33,668,000.

 

Indirect lease financing receivables represent loans to small businesses that are collateralized by equipment. These loans tend to have higher risk characteristics but generally provide higher rates of return. These loans are originated by a third party and purchased by QNB based on criteria specified by QNB. The criteria include minimum credit scores of the borrower, term of the lease, type and age of equipment financed and geographic area. The geographic area primarily represents states contiguous to Pennsylvania. QNB is not the lessor and does not service these loans. As a result of these higher returns the market for these types of loans has become extremely competitive both in terms of rate and quality available and as a result QNB has been purchasing fewer.purchased fewer leases.Lease financing income was $916,000$774,000 for 2013,2014, a decrease of $199,000$142,000 when compared to the $1,115,000$916,000 reported for 2012.2013. Average balances declined by $2,021,000,$1,482,000 or 17.9%16.0%, resulting in a reduction in income of $200,000$146,000 when comparing the two years. The yield on the portfolio wasimproved slightly to 9.95% in 2014, compared to 9.90% for 2013, and 9.88% for 2012.slightly offsetting the volume-related decline in income by $4,000. Early payoffspayoff on leases often results in the recognition of additional income.

 

Income on home equity loans declined by $122,000 when comparing 2013 and 2012. Beginning in the middle of 2013, QNB offered very attractive rates on both variable rate and fixed rate home equity loans in an attempt to increase demand. While the real benefit of these promotions on average balances will not be realized until 2014 average home equity loans increased $1,260,000, or 2.5%, to $52,418,000 when comparing 2013 and 2012. Home equity loan balances as of December 31, 2013 was $59,977,000. The yield on the home equity portfolio decreased 34 basis points to 4.06% when comparing the two years. The demand for home equity loans declined during prior periods as home values fell preventing some homeowners from having equity in their homes to borrow against while others took advantage of the low interest rates on mortgages and refinanced their home equity loans into a new mortgage. With the recent rise in mortgage interest rates and an improvement in home values it is expected that the demand for home equity loans will continue to improve.

Given the low yields on alternative investment securities management decided to retain some 15 year mortgages and hybrid adjustable rate mortgages to borrowers with high credit scores and low loan to value ratios. As a result, average residential mortgage loans secured by first lien 1-4 family residential mortgages increased by $988,000, or 3.6%, to $28,696,000 for 2013. The average yield on the residential real estate portfolio decreased by 51 basis points to 4.48% for 2013. The net result was a reduction of $98,000 in interest income.

Income on consumer loans declined from $219,000 for 2012 to $152,000 for 2013 and the yield declined from 10.08% for 2012 to 6.43% for 2013. QNB discontinued charging a continuous overdraft fee at the end of the second quarter of 2012 that was included in this category. This resulted in a $64,000 reduction in income when compared to 2012.

QNB desiresstrives to become the “local consumer lender of choice” and to affect this QNB has refocused its retail lending efforts by strengthening the management of the area, adding new product offerings and by increasing marketing and promotion. The positive impact of this renewed focus has been year-over-year growth in balances in all three categories of retail lending: residential mortgage, home equity and consumer loans. TheOverall, interest income impact should be seenfor retail lending increased $203,000 in 2014 compared to 2013, driven by the increase in average balances.

- 21 -

Income on home equity loans declined by $6,000 when comparing 2014 and 2013. During 2014 QNB offered attractive rates on both variable rate and fixed rate home equity loans, which contributed to an increase in average balances totaling $3,831,000, or 7.3%, to $56,249,000 when comparing 2014 and 2013. The yield on the home equity portfolio decreased 28 basis points to 3.78% when comparing the two years. The demand for home equity loans declined during prior periods as home values fell preventing some homeowners from having equity in their homes to borrow against while others took advantage of the low interest rates on mortgages and refinanced their home equity loans into a new mortgage. With an improvement in home values it is expected that the demand for home equity loans will continue.

Given the low yields on alternative investment securities management decided to retain certain hybrid adjustable rate mortgages to borrowers with high credit scores and low loan-to-value ratios. As a result, average residential mortgage loans secured by first lien 1-4 family residential mortgages increased by $5,427,000, or 18.9%, to $34,123,000 for 2014. The average yield on the residential real estate portfolio decreased by 27 basis points to 4.21% for 2014. Overall, interest income for this segment grew $151,000 in 2014.

 

ForInterest income on consumer loans increased $58,000. As with all other categories of retail loans, consumer loans at QNB experienced growth in average balances in 2014, with balances in this segment increasing $1,377,000, or 58.1%. This growth in volume contributed $89,000 to the most part, earningincrease in income, while decline in yield from 6.43% in 2013 to 5.60% offset the volume increase by $31,000. In 2014 QNB marketed auto loans, offering a competitive rate, driving loan demand.

Earning assets are funded primarily by deposits, which increased on average by $23,055,000,$20,245,000, or 2.9%2.5%, to $808,839,000,$829,084,000, when comparing 20132014 and 2012.2013. This follows an increase of $57,427,000,$23,055,000, or 7.9%2.9%, between 2011 and 2012 and $62,444,000, or 9.4%, between 2010 and 2011.2013. Total interest expense for 20132014 was $5,033,000$4,544,000 compared to $6,448,000$5,033,000 for 2012,2013, a decline of $1,415,000.$489,000. Interest expense on total deposits decreased $1,199,000$313,000 while interest expense on borrowed funds decreased $216,000$176,000 when comparing the two years. The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased 21seven basis points from 0.86% for 2012 to 0.65% for 2013.2013 to 0.58% for 2014. During this same period, the rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased 18six basis points from 0.82%0.64% to 0.64%0.58%. These yields will most likely not decline much further as deposit rates are close to reaching an inherent floor and may actually begin to increase as short-term interest rates begin to increaserise and the competition for deposits increases.

- 22 -

 

Similar to the past two years, the growth in deposits during 20132014 was centered in accounts with greater liquidity, such as non-interest and interest-bearing demand, interest-bearing municipal accounts, and savings deposits. Average non-interest-bearing demand accounts increased $6,272,000,$7,043,000, or 9.3%9.6%, to $73,384,000$80,427,000 for 2013.2014. QNB has been very successful in increasing business checking accounts as average balances in these accounts have increased by $7,040,000,$7,481,000, or 14.2%13.2%, when comparing the two years. Average interest-bearing demand accounts increased $11,032,000,$9,248,000, or 11.2%8.5%, to $109,383,000$118,631,000 for 20132014 compared to 2012; however,2013 with interest expense on interest-bearing demand accounts decreased $31,000increasing $14,000 to $260,000$274,000 for 2013 as the2014. The average rate paid decreased one basis point from 0.30% for 2012 to 0.24% for 2013.2013 to 0.23% for 2014. Included in this category is QNB-Rewards checking, a higher-rate checking account product. The decrease in interest expense and the average rate paid on interest-bearing demand accounts is primarily the result of a reduction in the rate paid on QNB-Rewards checking. At the beginning of 2012 the rate paid on balances up to $25,000 was 1.50% and 0.50% for balances over $25,000. Beginning February 1, 2012 the rate paid on this account was reduced to 1.25% on balances up to $25,000. In the middle of August 2012 the rate was reduced to 1.00% on balances up to $25,000 and 0.25% for balances over $25,000 where it has remained.in 2014. In order to receive the high rate a customer must receive an electronic statement, have one direct deposit or other ACH transaction and have at least 12 check card purchase transactions post and clear per statement cycle. For 2013,2014, the average balance in this product was $31,195,000$36,242,000 and the related interest expense was $215,000$225,000 for an average yieldcost of 0.69%funds of 0.62%. In comparison, the average balance of the QNB-Rewards accounts for 20122013 was $29,280,000$31,195,000 with a related interest expense of $251,000$215,000 and an average rate paid of 0.86%0.69%. Even with the reduction in the rates paid on the QNB-Rewards product, the yield of 1.00% for the first $25,000 and 0.25% on balances over $25,000, assuming qualifications are met, is still an attractive rate relative to competitors’ offerings as well as other QNB products. This product also generates fee income through the use of the check card. The average balance of other interest-bearing demand accounts included in this category increased from $69,071,000 for 2012 to $78,188,000 for 2013.2013 to $82,389,000 for 2014. The average rate paid on these balances was 0.06% for both years.

 

Interest expense on municipal interest-bearing demand accounts increased $25,000$10,000 to $389,000$399,000 for 2013.2014. The average balance of municipal interest-bearing demand accounts increased $31,850,000,$16,226,000, or 44.0%15.6%, to $104,314,000,$120,540,000, while the average interest rate paid on these accounts decreased from 0.50% for 2012 to 0.37% for 2013.2013 to 0.33% for 2014. Most of these accounts are indexed to the Federal funds rate with most having negotiated rate floors between 0.25% and 0.50%. QNB was successful in increasing its relationships with several of these customers as well as adding several new municipalities and school districts over the past year, accounting for the increase in balances. Many of these deposits are seasonal in nature and are received during the third quarter as tax receipts are collected and are withdrawn over the course of the next year.

 

Average money market accounts decreased $11,525,000,$7,411,000, or 14.9%11.3%, to $65,744,000$58,333,000 for 20132014 compared with 2012.2013. Much of the decline in money market balances is a result of a shift in these balances to either municipal interest-bearing demand accounts or eSavings accounts. Interest expense on money market accounts decreased $98,000$7,000 to $133,000$126,000 for 20132014 compared to 2012.2013. The average interest rate paid on money market accounts was 0.30% for 2012 and 0.20% for 2013 a declineand 0.22% for 2014, an increase of tentwo basis points. The majority of balances in this category are in the Select money market account, a product that pays a tiered rate based on account balances. With the continuation of exceptionally low short-term interest rates, the rates paid on the Select money market account have declined as well which contributed to the declinebalances remaining in interest expense and the rate paid.these accounts for 2014 were at higher-yielding tiers.

- 22 -

 

During the second quarter of 2009, QNB introduced an online eSavings account to compete with other online savings accounts. This product was introduced at a yield of 1.85% and has been extremely successful, having grownwith average balances growing $3,715,000, or 2.4%, to balances of $156,840,000 at December 31,$156,063,000 in 2014 compared to $152,348,000 in 2013. As market rates declined, the eSavings yield was also reduced and began 2012 at 1.00% before being reduced several times to finish the year at 0.60%. The rate on this product was further reduced to 0.45% during 2013.2013 and was unchanged throughout 2014. The average cost of funds on these accounts was 0.50% for 2013 compared with 0.76%0.46% for 2012.2014, with the rate remaining at 0.45% from the end of 2013 and throughout 2014. The average balance ofyield on this product was $152,348,000account may rise along with market rates and as competition for 2013 compared with $140,462,000 for 2012 and was responsible for most of the increase of $13,337,000, or 7.1%, in total average savings accounts when comparing the two years.balances increases. Traditional statement savings accounts and club accounts are also included in the savings category and increased on average by $1,451,000$2,861,000, or 5.8%, to $49,705,000.$52,566,000. The average rate paid on total savings accounts decreased 19four basis points from 0.60% for 2012 to 0.41% for 2013 to 0.37% for 2014 and interest expense decreased $321,000, or 28.1%,$50,000, from $1,141,000$820,000 to $820,000$770,000 over the same period. The growth in balances appears to reflect the desire for liquidity and a better rate than short-term time deposits.

 

The repricing of time deposits at lower rates combined with the decline in average time deposit balances continues to have the greatest impact on total interest expense. Total interest expense on time deposits decreased $774,000,$280,000, or 20.1%9.1%, to $3,071,000$2,791,000 for 2013.2014. Average total time deposits decreased by $27,911,000,$11,437,000, or 9.9%4.5%, to $253,961,000$242,524,000 for 2013.2014. Similar to fixed-rate loans and investment securities, time deposits reprice over time and, therefore, have less of an immediate impact on costs in either a rising or falling rate environment. Unlike loans and investment securities, however, the maturity and repricing characteristics of time deposits tend to be shorter. During 2013 and 2012, a significant amount of time deposits have repriced lower. The average rate paid on time deposits decreased from 1.36%1.21% to 1.21%1.15% when comparing 20122013 to 2013.2014.

 

Approximately $101,446,000,$115,347,000, or 42.3%47.4%, of time deposits at December 31, 20132014 will reprice or mature over the next 12 months.months, compared with 42.3% of the portfolio at December 31, 2013. The average rate paid on these time deposits is approximately 0.69%0.79%. QNB has been trying to lengthen the maturity of the time deposit portfolio by offering a 42 month time deposit that permits one bump in rate over the termattractive rates at an annual percentage yield of 1.01% and a 59 month time deposit at an annual percentage rate of 1.60%. Both have seenterms 36 months or greater, with moderate success. The yield on the time deposit portfolio may decline slightly in the next quarter as short-term time deposits reprice. However, given the short-term nature of these deposits interest expense could increase if short-term time deposit rates were to increase suddenly or if customers select higher paying longer term time deposits.

 

- 23 -

Short-term borrowings are primarily comprised of sweep accounts structured as repurchase agreements with our commercial customers.customers and overnight borrowings from the correspondent banks with average balances in 2014 of $29,574,000 and $2,042,000, respectively. Interest expense on short-term borrowings increased by $2,000$3,000 to $111,000$114,000 when comparing the two years. During this period average balances increased $4,896,000$1,873,000 to $29,743,000$31,616,000 while the average rate paid declined one basis point, from 0.44%0.37% to 0.37%0.36%.

 

Contributing to the decrease in total interest expense was a reduction in interest expense on long-term debt of $218,000. In April 2012, $15,000,000 of debt at a rate of 4.75% matured and was repaid resulting in the reduction in expense.$179,000. The average balance of long-term debt for 20132014 was $5,174,000$1,452,000 compared with $9,678,000$5,174,000 in 2012. Since the average rate on the2013. The final portion of long-term debt thattaken out in April 2012 matured and was repaid in 2012 was the same as the remaining debt, the average rate paid for 2013 was unchanged from the 4.75% rate paid in 2012. The remaining debt matures on April 17, 2014 and will result in additional interest expense savings.2014. The rate on this long-term debt was 4.75%.

 

 

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses represents management’s determination of the amount necessary to be charged to operations to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level that represents management’s best estimate of the known and inherent losses in the existing loan portfolio. QNB recorded a provision for loan losses of $400,000 in 2013 compared to $900,000 in 2012.for each of the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The lower provision for loan losses reflects the reduction in classified loans an improvement in delinquency levelsand nonperforming loans, and a reduction in specific impairment reserves. Net loan charge-offs were $1,324,000, or 0.25% of total average loans for 2014 compared with $1,247,000, or 0.26% of total average loans for 2013 compared with $369,000, or 0.08% of total average loans in 2012.2013. The majority of charge-offs recordedthe loans charged off during 20132014 had specific reserves established during the allowance for loan loss calculation process prior to the ultimate decision to charge-off the loan.loans. Deterioration in credit quality or significant growth in the loan portfolio could result in a higher provision for loan losses in 2014.2015.

 

Non-interest income comparison

                                
         

Change from prior year

          

Change from prior year

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

Amount

  

Percent

  

2014

  

2013

  

Amount

  

Percent

 

Fees for services to customers

 $1,594  $1,476  $118   8.0% $1,687  $1,594  $93   5.8%

ATM and debit card

  1,499   1,467   32   2.2   1,485   1,499   (14)  -0.9 

Retail brokerage and advisory

  523   39   484   1,241.0   657   523   134   25.6 

Bank-owned life insurance

  320   333   (13)  -3.9   472   320   152   47.5 

Merchant

  367   373   (6)  -1.6   299   367   (68)  -18.5 

Net gain on trading activities

  156   -   156   - 

Net gain on invesment securities

  824   577   247   42.8   1,112   824   288   35.0 

Net gain on sale of loans

  425   885   (460)  -52.0   258   425   (167)  -39.3 

Gain on sale of internet domain name

  1,000   -   1,000   - 

Other

  261   259   2   0.8   416   261   155   59.4 

Total

 $5,813  $5,409  $404   7.5% $7,542  $5,813  $1,729   29.7%

 

 

Non-Interest Income

QNB, through its core banking business, generates various fees and service charges. Total non-interest income includes service charges on deposit accounts, ATM and check card income, retail brokerage and advisory income, income on bank-owned life insurance, merchant income and gains and losses on investment securities and residential mortgage loans. On November 26, 2014, QNB transferred its former internet domain name to a third party for a purchase price of $1,000,000, as disclosed in a Form 8-K filing dated December 2, 2014. The Company also received a life insurance benefit totaling $158,000 during the fourth quarter. Total non-interest income was $7,542,000 in 2014 compared with $5,813,000 in 2013, compared with $5,409,000 in 2012, an increase of $404,000,$1,729,000, or 7.5%29.7%. Excluding these two non-recurring items, the Company posted an increase in non-interest income of $571,000, or 9.8%, for the twelve months ended of 2014, compared to the same period in 2013.

- 23 -

 

Fees for services to customers are primarily comprised of service charges on deposit accounts. These fees were $1,594,000$1,687,000 for 2013,2014, an increase of $118,000,$93,000, or 8.0%5.8%, from 2012.2013. Overdraft income, which represented approximately 69%72% and 66%69% of total fees for services to customers in 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, increased by $118,000,$115,000, or 12.0%10.5%, when comparing 20132014 to 2012.2013. The increase in overdraft income primarily reflects growth in the number of checking accounts as well as the positive impact of the introduction of an overdraft protection program on net overdraft income as the program reduced the amount of overdraft fees forgiven.

 

ATM and debit card income is primarily comprised of transaction income on debit cards and ATM cards and ATM surcharge income for the use of QNB’s ATM machines by non-QNB customers. ATM and debit card income was $1,499,000$1,485,000 in 2013, an increase2014, a decrease of $32,000,$14,000, or 2.2%0.9%, from the amount recorded in 2012.2013. Debit card income increased $159,000,$88,000, or 15.7%7.5%, to $1,172,000$1,261,000 in 2013,2014, while ATM interchange income decreased $123,000,$101,000, or 32.3%39.2%, to $256,000.$156,000. The Dodd-Frank Act and the Durbin amendment impacted both the total amount of interchange income received on debit and ATM transactions as well as the distribution between the two as merchants began routing their transactions through the low cost provider. Helping to contributeThe growth in checking accounts contributed to the growthincrease in debit card transactions is the growth inincome, including the QNB Rewards checking product, a high-yield checking account which requires, among other terms, the posting of a minimum of twelve debit card purchase transactions per statement cycle to receive the high interest rate. DataMultiple high profile data breaches like what was experienced by Target and others during the 2013 holiday season couldat national retailers throughout 2014 may have a negative impact on the volume of debit and credit card transactions and therefore income generated, as shoppers may lose confidence in the security of these cards and may alter their behavior and use cash more frequently.

- 24 -

 

Retail brokerage and advisory incomerevenue was $523,000$657,000 for 20132014 compared to $39,000$523,000 in 2012. During the fourth quarter of 2012,2013. QNB changed vendors and now provides securities and advisory services under the name of QNB Financial Services through Investment Professionals, Inc., a registered Broker/Dealer and Registered Investment Advisor. Prior to the change QNB shared in the revenue generated by the advisor but had minimal expenses because the advisor was an employee of the vendor. With the change, QNB receives a higher percentage75% to 86% of the revenue generated, depending on volume but is also is responsible for salaries and expenses because theof two advisors who are now QNB employees. As a result there has been a significant increase in both revenue and expense; howeverIn 2014, the net is an additionalamount of income provided by these services was $112,000, compared to $74,000 in net income.income for 2013.

 

Income on bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) represents the earnings and death benefits on life insurance policies in which the Bank is the beneficiary. The insurance carriers reset the rates on these policies annually taking into consideration the interest rate environment as well as mortality costs. The existing policies have rate floors which minimize how low the earnings rate can go. Some of these policies are currently at their floor. Income on these policies during 2014 was $472,000, including $158,000 related to a death claim. Excluding the claim, income in 2014 would be $314,000, compared to $320,000 and $333,000 in 2013, and 2012, respectively with the decline in income resulting from a decrease in the earning credit rate from one carrier and increases in mortality costs.

 

Merchant income represents fees charged to merchants for the Bank’s handling of credit card or charge sales. Merchant income was $367,000$299,000 for 2013,2014, a decrease of $6,000,$68,000, or 1.6%18.5%, from the amount reported in 2012.2013. The decrease in merchant income is primarily a result of extremely competitive pricing in the market as salesmarket. Sales volume increaseddecreased approximately 5.7%10.1% year over year.year, due to the loss of three vendors to competition, the acquisition of new clients at smaller margins and possible change in card-holders’ behavior due to multiple data breaches in 2014. QNB had 251 merchant customers at December 31, 2014 and 247 merchant customers at December 31, 2013.

 

The fixed-income securities portfolio represents a significant portion of QNB’s earning assets and is also a primary tool in liquidity and asset/liability management. QNB actively manages its fixed-income portfolio in an effort to take advantage of changes in the shape of the yield curve, changes in spread relationships in different sectors, and for liquidity purposes. Management continually reviews strategies that will result in an increase in the yield or improvement in the structure of the investment portfolio, including monitoring credit and concentration risk in the portfolio. In addition the Corporation owns a small portfolio of equity securities for the purpose of generating both dividend income and capital appreciation.

 

Net investment securities gains were $1,112,000 for 2014 compared to $824,000 for 2013 compared to $577,000 for 2012.2013. Included in these figures were gains from equity securities of $1,045,000 and $629,000, in 2014 and $451,000, in 2013, and 2012, respectively. The 2013 net gains were comprised of $672,000 realized on the sales of equity securities reduced by an other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) charge of $43,000 while the 2012 net gains consisted of $556,000 of gains on the sale of equity securities reduced by$43,000. There were no OTTI charges of $105,000.in 2014. With the outstanding performance in the U.S. equity markets during 20122013 and 2013,2014, QNB elected to sell some equity holdings and recognize gains. Gains on the sale of fixed income securities were $67,000 and $195,000 for 2014 and $126,000 for 2013, and 2012, respectively. Both the 20132014 and 20122013 fixed income gains were primarily from the sale of fast paying or odd-lot mortgage-backed and CMO securities while the 2013 gains also included the sale ofas well as low yielding agency bonds that were likely to be called in the next two years.

 

The net gain on residential mortgage sales is directly related to the volume of mortgages sold and the timing of the sales relative to the interest rate environment. Residential mortgage loans to be sold are identified at origination. The net gain on the sale of residential mortgage loans was $258,000 and $425,000 for 2014 and $885,000 for 2013, and 2012, respectively. A significant increase in mid-term and long-term treasury ratesMortgage refinance activity slowed significantly beginning in June 2013 was a key contributorand continued through the first six months of 2014 due to the lower gains recorded ashigher mortgage refinance activity slowed significantly and the gains realized on each sale was reduced. In addition, 2012 benefited from historically low mortgage rates which contributed to a significantly higher level of refinancing activity as well as contraction in GDP during the amount of gains recorded on the sale of these mortgages.first quarter 2014. Proceeds from the sale of residential mortgages were $17,022,000$6,589,000 and $21,039,000 for 2013 and 2012, respectively. The low interest rate environment in 2012 also resulted in a larger gain recorded on average, per sale.$17,022,000. Included in the gains on the sale of residential mortgages in 2014 and 2013 are $48,000 and 2012 are $126,000, and $153,000, respectively, related to the recognition of mortgage servicing assets.

- 24 -

 

When QNB sells its residential mortgages in the secondary market, it retains servicing rights. A normal servicing fee is retained on all mortgage loans sold and serviced. QNB recognizes its obligation to service financial assets that are retained in a transfer of assets in the form of a servicing asset. The servicing asset is amortized in proportion to, and over, the period of net servicing income or loss. On a quarterly basis, servicing assets are assessed for impairment based on their fair value. Mortgage servicing income of $135,000 for 2014 and $152,000 for 2013 is included in other non-interest income.

 

Other non-interest income was $261,000$416,000 for 2013,2014, an increase of $2,000$155,000 from the amount recorded in 2012. Mortgage servicing2013. There were no OREO sales in 2014, compared to a $174,000 loss on sale of OREO in 2013. In addition, the Company received $30,000 in rental income increased $148,000 as the increasefor an OREO property in interest rates and the slowdown in mortgage refinance activity resulted in a $50,000 reduction in the amortization of the mortgage servicing asset and also resulted in an increase in the fair value of the asset which allowed for the partial reversal of the valuation allowance previously recorded. During 2012, $53,000 in impairment charges were recorded; while in 2013, $37,000 of this valuation allowance was reversed and recorded as income.2014. QNB receives income from its membership in Laurel Abstract Company LLC,LLC. This income from the title company increased $41,000decreased by $61,000 to $13,000 when comparing the two years. QNB also offers credit cards through a third party and receives income from this relationship. This income was $16,000 higheryears, due to the slowdown in 2013 thanmortgage refinance activity in 2012. Partially offsetting these increases in income was an increase of $165,000 related2014 compared to losses on the sale of other real estate owned and repossessed assets when compare to 2012.2013.

 

- 25 -

Non-interest expense comparison

                
          

Change from prior year

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

Amount

  

Percent

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 $10,553  $10,403  $150   1.4%

Net occumpancy

  1,638   1,630   8   0.5 

Furniture and equipment

  1,714   1,503   211   14.0 

Marketing

  971   829   142   17.1 

Third party services

  1,488   1,508   (20)  -1.3 

Telephone, postage and supplies

  670   614   56   9.1 

State taxes

  690   647   43   6.6 

FDIC insurance premiums

  705   695   10   1.4 

Other

  1,797   1,796   1   0.1 

Total

 $20,226  $19,625  $601   3.1%

Non-interest expense comparison

                
          

Change from prior year

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

  

Amount

  

Percent

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 $11,649  $10,553  $1,096   10.4%

Net occupancy

  1,705   1,638   67   4.1 

Furniture and equipment

  1,753   1,714   39   2.3 

Marketing

  841   971   (130)  -13.4 

Third party services

  1,677   1,488   189   12.7 

Telephone, postage and supplies

  730   670   60   9.0 

State taxes

  617   690   (73)  -10.6 

FDIC insurance premiums

  686   705   (19)  -2.7 

Other

  1,968   1,797   171   9.5 

Total

 $21,626  $20,226  $1,400   6.9%

 

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense is comprised of costs related to salaries and employee benefits, net occupancy, furniture and equipment, marketing, third party services, FDIC insurance premiums, regulatory assessments and taxes and various other operating expenses. Total non-interest expense was $20,226,000$21,626,000 in 2013,2014, an increase of $601,000,$1,400,000, or 3.1%6.9%, from the $19,625,000$20,226,000 recorded in 2012.2013. QNB’s overhead efficiency ratio, which represents the percentage of each dollar of revenue that is used for non-interest expense, is calculated by taking non-interest expense divided by net operating revenue on a tax-equivalent basis.revenue. The Bank’s efficiency ratios for 2014 and 2013 were 65.9% and 2012 were 65.7% and 61.3%, respectively, and compare favorably with Pennsylvania state-chartered commercial banks with assets between $500$750 million and $1$1.5 billion which had average efficiency ratios of 70.2%67.9% and 66.7% for both2014 and 2013, and 2012.respectively.

 

Salaries and benefits expense is the largest component of non-interest expense. QNB monitors, through the use of various surveys, the competitive salary and benefit information in its markets and makes adjustments when appropriate. Salaries and benefits expense for 20132014 was $10,553,000,$11,649,000, an increase of $150,000,$1,096,000, or 1.4%10.4%, over the $10,403,000$10,553,000 reported in 2012.2013. Salary expense for 20132014 was $8,436,000,$8,965,000, an increase of $104,000,$529,000, or 1.2%6.3%, over the $8,332,000$8,436,000 reported in 2012.2013. Included in salary expense in 20122014 was incentive compensation plus related payroll taxes of $439,000.$282,000. There was no incentive compensation recorded during 2013. Excluding the cost of incentive compensation, salary expense increased $543,000,$247,000, or 6.9%2.9%, when comparing 20132014 to 2012. Contributing to the increase in salary expense was the addition of ten full-time equivalent employees. The increase in employees was primarily related to the opening of two new branch locations in the first quarter of 2013 as well as two commissioned employees related to QNB Financial Services. With the retirement of Mr. Bisko and the promotion of Mr. Freeman to Chief Executive Officer in 2013, the Chief Operating Officer position was left vacant resulting in a reduction in salary and benefits expense.2013. Benefit expense for 20132014 was $2,117,000,$2,684,000, an increase of $46,000,$567,000, or 2.2%26.8%, from the amount recorded in 2012. An increase in2013, with medical benefits increasing $470,000, or 48.8%, related to a number of large claims. QNB self-funds medical insurance and also has Stop Loss insurance which limits its claims expense. Payroll taxes and retirement plan matching and safe harbor contributions accounted for $43,000 of the increaseand other benefits increased $98,000 in benefits expense.2014.

 

FurnitureNet occupancy and furniture and equipment expense increased $211,000,$106,000, or 14.0%3.2%, to $1,714,000$3,458,000 when comparing 20132014 to 2012. Approximately $103,000 of the2013. This is related to a $45,000 increase pertains toin equipment maintenance costs coupled with higher depreciation and amortization costs primarily related to the twoexpense on buildings, new locations opened in 2013 as well as the upgrade of most of the Bank’s ATM machines. Higherfurniture, equipment maintenance costs of $103,000 also contributed to the increase in furniture and equipment expense when comparing 2013 and 2012. The majority of these additional costs relate to programs utilized for compliance and overdraft protection.software.

 

Marketing expense was $971,000$841,000 for 2013, an increase2014, a decrease of $142,000,$130,000, or 17.1%13.4%, from the $829,000$971,000 recorded in 2012.2013. Marketing expenses related to advertising, public relations, research and sales promotion were $80,000 higherdecreased $58,000 for the year ended December 31, 20132014 compared to 2012.2013. The opening of the two new branch locations and the introduction of QNB Financial Services were the primary contributors to the increase in these categories. An increasecategories in 2013. A reduction in charitable contributions of $62,000$72,000 also contributed to the increasedecrease in the marketing expense category. QNB contributes to many not-for-profit organizations and clubs and sponsors many local events in the communities it serves.

 

Telephone, postage and supplies expense was $56,000,$60,000, or 9.1%9.0%, higher for 20132014 than 20122013 with communication costs which includesinclude telephone and internet costs increasing $37,000 and supplies expense increasing $15,000. Much of these increases are attributable toaccounting for the Colmar and Warminster locations opened in early 2013. Also impacting telephone expense was anincrease. An increase in bandwidth to provide faster communications to our branch locations.locations contributed to this cost increase.

 

State tax expense represents the payment of the Pennsylvania Shares Tax, Pennsylvania sales and use tax and the Pennsylvania capital stock tax. State tax expense was $690,000$617,000 and $647,000$690,000 for the years 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. The Pennsylvania Shares Tax which is based primarily on the equity of the Bank was $689,000and makes up the majority of the expense in 2013, an increasethis category. The decline from prior the prior year is a result of $56,000 reflecting higher equity levels.a change in the state-mandated formula for 2014, which resulted in lower tax expense despite increased Bank equity.

 

 
- 2625 -

 

 

Income Taxes

Applicable income taxes and effective tax rates were $2,644,000, or 22.7%, for 2014 compared to $2,346,000, or 21.8%, for 2012 compared to $2,609,000, or 22.1%, for 2012.2013. The lowerhigher effective tax rate for 20132014 is predominately a result of tax-exempt income from loans and securities comprising a larger proportionsmaller proportional share of pre-tax income. For a more comprehensive analysis of income tax expense and deferred taxes, refer to Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

Financial Condition

Financial service organizations are challenged to demonstrate they can generate sustainable and consistent earnings growth in a dynamic operating environment. This challenge was evident over the past few years as financial institutions, including QNB, had to operate in an unprecedented economic environment which included a global recession, the freeze up in credit markets, the bursting of the housing bubble, significant volatility in the equity markets, asset quality issues and historically low interest rates. While the economy continues to show signs of improvement and loan activity has begun to show life, the low level of interest rates and the extreme rate competition for quality loans is anticipated to continue through 2014. It is also anticipated that the rate competition for attracting and retaining deposits will increase in 2014 and 2015 as short-term interest rates are expected to begin to increase which could result in a lower net interest margin and a further decline in net interest income. QNB operates in an attractive but highly competitive market for financial services. Competition comes in many forms including other local community banks, regional banks, national financial institutions and credit unions, all with a physical presence in the markets we serve. In addition, other strong forms of competition have emerged, such as internet banks. The internet has enabled customers to “rate shop” financial institutions throughout the nation, both for deposits and retail loans. QNB has been able to compete effectively by emphasizing a consistently high level of customer service, including local decision-making on loans and by providing a broad range of high quality financial products designed to address the specific needs of our customers. The establishment of long-term customer relationships and customer loyalty remain our primary focus.

ASSETS

 

TotalThe following table presents total assets at December 31, 2013 were $932,883,000, an increase of $13,009,000, or 1.4%, when compared with total assets of $919,874,000 at December 31, 2012. The growth in total assets since December 31, 2012 was centered in loans receivable which increased $23,983,000, or 5.0%, to $501,716,000 at December 31, 2013. This reverses the trend that has occurred since 2010 where the significant growth in assets was centered in the investment portfolio. Total loans decreased $12,203,000, or 2.5%, in 2012dates indicated:

          

Change from prior year

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

  

Amount

  

Percent

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $18,245  $16,286  $1,959   12.0%

Investment securities

  379,572   388,816   (9,244)  -2.4 

Restricted investment in bank stocks

  647   1,764   (1,117)  -63.3 

Loans held-for-sale

  380   -   380   - 

Loans receivable

  555,282   501,716   53,566   10.7 

Allowance for loan losses

  (8,001)  (8,925)  924   -10.4 

Premises and equipment, net

  9,702   9,875   (173)  -1.8 

Bank-owned life insurance

  10,658   10,407   251   2.4 

Accrued interest receivable

  2,568   2,579   (11)  -0.4 

Other assets

  8,082   10,365   (2,283)  -22.0 

Total assets

 $977,135  $932,883  $44,252   4.7%

Cash and only increased $7,754,000, or 1.6%, in 2011. When comparing balances at December 31, 2013 and 2012, investment security balances declined $12,832,000 or 3.2%. This followed 2012 and 2011 where investment balances increased $52,230,000, or 14.9%, and $56,187,000, or 19.2%, respectively. . Most of the decline in investment balances when comparing December 31, 2012 and 2013 is a result of changes in fair value caused by rising interest rates.

interest-earnings deposits

Total cash and cash equivalents increased $833,000$1,959,000 from $15,453,000 at December 31, 2012 to $16,286,000 at December 31, 2013. Premises and equipment, net of depreciation increased $902,0002013 to $10,407,000$18,245,000 at December 31, 2013 with most of the increase related to the opening of the Colmar branch in February 2013 and the purchase of land to be used for employee parking at the Towne Bank Center. The category of other assets increased $1,263,000 from $9,102,000 at December 31, 2012 to $10,365,000 at December 31, 2013. Most of the increase in other assets relates to the change in the deferred tax asset resulting from the change in fair value of the available-for-sale investment portfolio between December 31, 2012 and 2013. The net deferred tax asset was$5,518,000 at December 31, 2013, an increase of $3,841,000 compared to $1,677,000 at December 31, 2012. The detail of the net deferred tax asset can be found in Footnote 11 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Partially offsetting the increase in the deferred tax asset was a $3,081,000 receivable related to a participation loan in which the borrower paid the lead bank on December 31, 2012 but QNB did not receive the proceeds until January 2, 2013. In addition, in July 2013 the FDIC repaid the excess prepaid FDIC assessment which had a balance of $862,000 at December 31, 2012.

Funding the growth in total assets was an increase in total deposits of $12,894,000, or 1.6%, to $814,532,000 at December 31, 2013. For the third consecutive year the growth in total deposits reflects increases in core deposits. Interest-bearing demand accounts, including municipal deposits, increased $45,575,000 to $236,910,000 at December 31, 2013. Included in this increase was an increase in municipal deposits of $43,747,000. Savings accounts increased $15,892,000 to $207,229,000 at December 31, 2013. Partially offsetting the growth in municipal and savings deposits was a decline in money market accounts, primarily business accounts which decreased $21,186,000 to $54,861,000 at December 31, 2013 and time deposits which decreased $29,689,000 to $239,545,000 at December 31, 2013.

Short-term borrowings increased $2,668,000 to $35,156,000 at December 31, 2013 with commercial sweep accounts increasing $7,168,000 and overnight borrowings from the FHLB decreasing $4,500,000. Total shareholders’ equity decreased $1,998,000, or 2.6%, to $75,625,000 at December 31, 2013 with retained earnings, net income less dividends paid, contributing $4,883,000 and the dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan, employee stock purchase plan and stock option plan contributing $914,000. Offsetting these increases to total shareholders’ equity was a $7,868,000 accumulated other comprehensive loss resulting from the decline in fair value of the available-for-sale investment portfolio caused by increasing interest rates. QNB is considered “well capitalized” based on FDIC requirements.

QNB’s financial condition will be explored in more detail in the sections that follow.

- 27 -

Investment Portfolio History

            

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2011

 

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

            

U.S. Government agency

 $71,639  $104,130  $68,493 

State and municipal

  87,199   86,789   78,786 

U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs)

            

Mortgage-backed

  139,723   107,973   113,243 

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  75,394   94,091   79,345 

Pooled trust preferred

  2,069   1,962   1,929 

Corporate debt

  6,021   2,502   2,495 

Equity

  6,625   4,055   3,800 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

 $388,670  $401,502  $348,091 

Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity

            

State and municipal

 $146  $146  $1,327 

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

 $146  $146  $1,327 

Total investment securities

 $388,816  $401,648  $349,418 

Investment Securities and Other Short-Term Investments

2014. QNB had interest bearing balances at the Federal Reserve Bank of $5,930,000 at December 31, 2014 compared with $3,544,000 at December 31, 2013 compared with $487,000 at December 31, 2012. These balances are included in the category of interest bearing deposits in banks. 2013.

Investment Securities and Other Short-Term Investments

At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, QNB had no Federal funds sold. With the decline in the Federal funds rate to between 0.0% and 0.25% the decision was made to maintain, excess funds for liquidity purposes are kept at the Federal Reserve which was paying 0.25% and carries a 0% risk weighting for risk-based capital calculation purposes.

 

Investment Portfolio History

            

December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

  

2012

 

Trading Securities

            

State and municipal

 $4,207  -  - 

Total trading securities

 $4,207  $-  $- 

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

            

U.S. Government agency

 $62,665  $71,639  $104,130 

State and municipal

  72,569   87,199   86,789 

U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs):

            

Mortgage-backed

  136,192   139,723   107,973 

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  87,662   75,394   94,091 

Pooled trust preferred

  2,439   2,069   1,962 

Corporate debt

  6,037   6,021   2,502 

Equity

  7,655   6,625   4,055 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

 $375,219  $388,670  $401,502 

Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity

            

State and municipal

 $146  $146  $146 

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

 $146  $146  $146 

Total investment securities

 $379,572  $388,816  $401,648 

- 26 -

The total carrying amount of investment securities at December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $379,572,000 and 2012 were $388,816,000, and $401,648,000, respectively. For both periods, approximately 75.0%75% of QNB’s investment securities were either U.S. Government agency debt securities, U.S. Government agency issued mortgage-backed securities or collateralized mortgage obligation securities (CMOs).CMOs. As of December 31, 2013,2014, QNB held no securities of any one issue or any one issuer (excluding the U.S. Government and its agencies) that were in excess of 10% of shareholders’ equity.

 

The QNB investment portfolio represents a significant portion of earning assets and interest income. QNB actively manages the investment portfolio in an attempt to maximize earnings, while considering liquidity needs, interest rate risk and credit risk. Proceeds from the sale of investments were $19,559,000$29,972,000 in 20132014 compared to $44,600,000$19,559,000 during 2012.2013.

 

In addition to the proceeds from the sale of investment securities, proceeds from maturities, calls and prepayments of securities were $82,360,000 in 2014, compared with $110,123,000 in 2013, compared with $136,761,000 in 2012.2013. The significant amount of proceeds in both years reflects the low interest rate environment that has existed for approximately the past fivesix years which resulted in a significant amount of agency and municipal bonds being called as well an increase in the amount of prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and CMOs. With the increase in Treasury rates since the endThe reduction of the second quarterinvestment portfolio as a percent of 2013,total assets in 2014 accounts for the amount of calls and prepayments in the portfolio has slowed. The decrease in cash flow from sales, calls and prepayments in 2013 along with the slower growth in depositscompared to 2013. Strong loan demand resulted in a reduction in the amount of bonds purchased in 20132014 compared to recent years. During 2013, $130,213,0002014, $92,017,000 of investment securities were purchased compared with $235,452,000$130,213,000 during 2012.2013.

 

Net activity was concentrated in U.S. Government agency issued mortgage-backed securities as the balance increased by $31,750,000CMOs grew $12,268,000 to $139,723,000$87,662,000 at December 31, 2013 and represents 35.9%2014, representing 23.1% of the investment portfolio compared to 26.9%19.4% at December 31, 2012.2013. This sector was increased because these bonds provide monthly cash flow to be reinvested in either loans or other securities, potentially at higher yields asshould rates are anticipated to increase. The balance of U.S. Government agency securities decreased by $32,491,000$8,974,000 to $71,639,000$62,665,000 at December 31, 20132014 and represents 18.4%16.5% of the portfolio compared to 25.9%18.4% at December 31, 2012.2013. Many of the bonds called were in the agency portfolio and the decision was made not to reinvest the proceeds back into this portfolio because of the low yields relative to mortgage-backedamortizing securities and the lack of monthly cash flow that mortgage-backed securities provide. The sector concentration was also impacted by the seasonal municipal deposits. In prior years, more of these municipal deposits would have been invested in theU.S. Government agency portfolio into bonds that had a very high likelihood of being called within six to nine months, the anticipated cash flow period of these deposits. With the increase in market rates in the second and third quarters of 2013 bonds with these characteristics were difficult to find resulting in the purchase of more mortgage-backed securities. Mostsecurities decreased $3,531,000, remaining approximately 35.9% of the bonds in the agencytotal portfolio have call features ranging from three months to three years. The balance in the CMO portfolio decreased $18,697,000 to $75,394,000 at December 31, 20132014 and represents 19.4% of the investment portfolio compared to 23.4% at December 31, 2012.2013.

- 28 -

 

The balance of municipal securities increased $410,000decreased $10,423,000 to $87,199,000$76,776,000 -- $4,207,000 in trading and $72,569,000 in available for sale -- at December 31, 2013 and represents 22.4%2014, representing 20.2% of the investment portfolio compared to 21.6%22.4% at December 31, 2012.2013. When QNB purchases a municipal security it focuses on the financial performance of the underlying issuer not just the bond rating of the issuer or the rating of bond insurer, if present. MostThirty-nine bonds with a par value of the activity$14,425,000 were called in this portfolio during 2013 focused on replacing bonds that had been called or matured. Unfortunately the replacement bonds2014 and purchased municipal securities had significantly lower yields then the bonds they replaced which contributed to the decline in the yield on the portfolio.

 

QNB owns collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) in the form of pooled trust preferred securities. These securities are comprised mainly of securities issued by banks or bank holding companies, and to a lesser degree, insurance companies. In most cases, QNB owns the mezzanine tranches of these securities. These securities are structured so that the senior and mezzanine tranches are protected from defaults by over-collateralization and cash flow default protection provided by subordinated tranches. QNB holds sevensix of these securities with an amortized cost of $3,519,000 and a fair value of $2,069,000$2,439,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. All of the trust preferred securities are available-for-sale securities and are carried at fair value. There were no credit-related OTTI charges during 20132014 or 20122013 on these securities. It is possible that future calculationsFuture estimates of fair value of these securities could require recording additional OTTI charges through earnings. QNB uses an independent third party to value these securities and to determine if credit-related OTTI exists. For additional detail on these securities see Notes 4 and 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

QNB accounts for its investments by classifying securities into three categories. Securities that QNB has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and reported at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not classified as either held-to-maturity securities or trading securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase. QNB held trading securities of $4,207,000 and an additional $1,160,000 in a brokerage cash account at December 31, 2014. QNB held no trading securities at December 31, 2013.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, or 2012.investment securities totaling $206,774,000 and $207,868,000, respectively, were pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements and public deposits.

- 27 -

Investment Portfolio Maturities and Weighted Average Yields

December 31, 2014

 

One year

or less

  

After one

year

through

five years

  

After five

years

through

ten years

  

After ten

years

  

Total

 

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

                    

U.S. Government agency:

                    

Fair value

 $3,034  $40,944  $18,687   -  $62,665 

Weighted average yield

  2.06%  1.45%  1.93%  -   1.63%

State and municipal:

                    

Fair value

  3,789   6,990   40,388  $21,402   72,569 

Weighted average yield

  4.17%  3.28%  3.98%  4.70%  4.13%

Mortgage-backed:

                    

Fair value

  -   123,511   12,681   -   136,192 

Weighted average yield

  -   2.07%  2.15%  -   2.08%

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs):

                    

Fair value

  2,446   85,216   -   -   87,662 

Weighted average yield

  2.58%  1.78%  -   -   1.81%

Pooled trust preferred:(1)

                    

Fair value

  -   -   -   2,439   2,439 

Weighted average yield

  -   -   -   -   - 

Corporate debt:

                    

Fair value

  -   4,022   2,015   -   6,037 

Weighted average yield

  -   0.99%  1.40%  -   1.13%

Equity:

                    

Fair value

  -   -   -   7,655   7,655 

Weighted average yield

  -   -   -   3.12%  3.12%

Total fair value

 $9,269  $260,683  $73,771  $31,496  $375,219 

Weighted average yield

  3.06%  1.90%  3.06%  3.82%  2.31%
                     

Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity

                    

State and municipal:

                    

Amortized cost

  -  $146   -   -  $146 

Weighted average yield

  -   6.98%  -   -   6.98%

Securities are assigned to categories based on stated contractual maturity except for mortgage-backed securities and CMOs which are based on anticipated payment periods and state and municipal securities which are based on pre-refunded date if applicable. Tax-exempt securities were adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis and are based on the marginal Federal corporate tax rate of 34 percent and a Tax Equity and Financial Responsibility Act (TEFRA) adjustment of four basis points. Weighted average yields on investment securities available-for-sale are based on amortized cost.

(1) All pooled trust preferred securities are on non-accrual status.

Investment Securities - Trading

In 2014, QNB established a small percentage of its investment portfolio as trading in an effort to boost yields and income. During the first quarter of 2014 QNB sold $5 millionapproximately $5,000,000 of available-for-sale municipal securities with the proceeds reinvested into a municipal trading account.

At The fair value of the trading portfolio is $4,207,000 at December 31, 20132014. QNB recorded $156,000 in non-interest income comprising realized and 2012, investment securities totaling $207,868,000 and $170,433,000, respectively, were pledged as collateralunrealized gains for repurchase agreements and public deposits. 2014.

- 29 -

Investment Portfolio Maturities and Weighted Average Yields

                

December 31, 2013

 

One year

or less

  

After one

year

through

five years

  

After five

years

through

ten years

  

After ten

years

  

Total

 

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

                    

U.S. Government agency:

                    

Fair value

  -  $39,889  $31,750   -  $71,639 

Weighted average yield

  -   1.35%  1.44%  -   1.39%

State and municipal:

                    

Fair value

 $9,003   9,467   33,394  $35,335   87,199 

Weighted average yield

  5.71%  2.97%  4.22%  4.27%  4.26%

Mortgage-backed:

                    

Fair value

  -   103,178   36,545   -   139,723 

Weighted average yield

  -   2.23%  1.96%  -   2.16%

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs):

                    

Fair value

  2,704   57,735   14,955   -   75,394 

Weighted average yield

  2.81%  1.89%  1.80%  -   1.90%

Pooled trust preferred:(1)

                    

Fair value

  -   -   -   2,069   2,069 

Weighted average yield

  -   -   -   -   - 

Corporate debt:

                    

Fair value

  -   4,034   1,987   -   6,021 

Weighted average yield

  -   0.99%  1.40%  -   1.12%

Equity:

                    

Fair value

  -   -   -   6,625   6,625 

Weighted average yield

  -   -   -   3.66%  3.66%

Total fair value

 $11,707  $214,303  $118,631  $44,029  $388,670 

Weighted average yield

  5.05%  1.98%  2.41%  3.86%  2.42%
                     

Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity

                    

State and municipal:

                    

Amortized cost

  -  $146   -   -  $146 

Weighted average yield

  -   6.98%  -   -   6.98%

Securities are assigned to categories based on stated contractual maturity except for mortgage-backed securities and CMOs which are based on anticipated payment periods and state and municipal securities which are based on pre-refunded date if applicable. Tax-exempt securities were adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis and are based on the marginal Federal corporate tax rate of 34 percent and a Tax Equity and Financial Responsibility Act (TEFRA) adjustment of 4 basis points. Weighted average yields on investment securities available-for-sale are based on amortized cost.

(1) All pooled trust preferred securities are on non-accrual status.

 

Investments Available-For-Sale

Available-for-sale investment securities include securities that management intends to use as part of its liquidity and asset/liability management strategy. These securities may be sold in response to changes in market interest rates, changes in the securities prepayment or credit risk, the need for liquidity, or growth in loan demand. At December 31, 2013,2014, the fair value of investment securities available-for-sale was $375,219,000, or $1,375,000 above the amortized cost of $373,844,000. This compares to a fair value of $388,670,000, or $5,170,000 below the amortized cost of $393,840,000. This compares to a fair value of $401,502,000, or $6,752,000 above the amortized cost of $394,750,000,$393,840,000, at December 31, 2012.2013. Unrealized holding gains, net of tax, of $907,000 were recorded as an increase to shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2014. Unrealized holding losses, net of tax, of $3,412,000 were recorded as a decrease to shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2013. Unrealized holding gains, net of tax, of $4,456,000 were recorded as an increase to shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2012. The available-for-sale portfolio, excluding equity securities and the pooled trust preferred securities, had a weighted average maturity of approximately 3.8 years and 3.23.5 years at December 31, 20132014 and 3.8 years at December 31, 2012, respectively. The increase in average life reflects the impact of higher interest rates along the intermediate and longer term part of the yield curve on prepayment speeds on mortgage-backed and CMO securities and the likelihood of calls on callable agency and municipal securities.2013. The weighted average tax-equivalent yield was 2.42%2.31% and 2.55%2.42% at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, respectively.

- 30 -

 

The weighted average maturity is based on the stated contractual maturity or likely call date of all securities except for MBS and CMOs, which are based on estimated average life. The maturity of the portfolio could become shorter if interest rates declined and prepayments on MBS and CMOs increased or securities are called. However, the estimated average life could lengthen if interest rates were to increase and principal payments on MBS and CMOs slowed or securities anticipated to be called extend past their call date.

 

- 28 -

  

Investments Held-To-Maturity

Investment securities held-to-maturity are recorded at amortized cost. Included in this portfolio are state and municipal securities. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the amortized cost of investment securities held-to-maturity was $146,000 and $146,000, respectively, and the fair value was $162,000$156,000 and $166,000,$162,000, respectively. At December 31, 2014 and 2013 there was only onea single municipal security remaining in the held-to-maturity portfolio. The held-to-maturity portfolio had a weighted average maturity of approximately 2.81.8 years and 3.82.8 years at December 31, 2013,2014 and December 31, 2012,2013, respectively. The weighted average tax-equivalent yield was 6.98% at both December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.

 

 

Loans

QNB’s primary business is to accept deposits and to make loans to meet the credit needs of the communities it serves. Loans are the most significant component of earning assets and growth in loans to small businesses and residents of these communities has been a primary focus of QNB. Inherent within the lending function is the evaluation and acceptance of credit risk and interest rate risk. QNB manages credit risk associated with its lending activities through portfolio diversification, underwriting policies and procedures and loan monitoring practices.

 

QNB has comprehensive policies and procedures that define and govern commercial loan, retail loan and indirect lease financing originations and the management of risk. All loans are underwritten in a manner that emphasizes the borrowers’ capacity to pay. The measurement of capacity to pay delineates the potential risk of non-payment or default. The higher potential for default determines the need for and amount of collateral required. QNB makes unsecured commercial loans when the capacity to pay is considered substantial. As capacity lessens, collateral is required to provide a secondary source of repayment and to mitigate the risk of loss. Various policies and procedures provide guidance to the lenders on such factors as amount, terms, price, maturity and appropriate collateral levels. Each risk factor is considered critical to ensuring that QNB receives an adequate return for the risk undertaken, and that the risk of loss is minimized.

 

QNB manages the risk associated with commercial loans by having lenders work in tandem with credit analysts while maintaining independence between personnel. In addition, a Bank loan committee and a committee of the Board of Directors review and approve certain loan requests on a weekly basis. At December 31, 2013,2014, there were no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans other than disclosed in the Loan Portfolio table.

 

QNB’s commercial lending activity is focused on small businesses within the local community. Commercial purpose loans are generally perceived as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans with a personal purpose and consumer loans. These types of loans involve larger loan balances to a single borrower or group of related borrowers and are more susceptible to a risk of loss during a downturn in the business cycle. These loans may involve greater risk because the availability of funds to repay these loans depends on the successful operation of the borrower’s business. The assets financed are used within the business for its ongoing operation. Repayment of these kinds of loans generally comes from the cash flow of the business or the ongoing conversions of assets, such as accounts receivable and inventory, to cash. Commercial and industrial loans represent commercial purpose loans that are either secured by collateral other than real estate or unsecured.

 

Commercial loans secured by commercial real estate include commercial purpose loans collateralized at least in part by commercial real estate. Some of these loans may not be for the express purpose of conducting commercial real estate transactions. Commercial loans secured by residential real estate are commercial purpose loans generally secured by the business owner’s residence or residential investment properties owned by the borrower and rented to tenants. Commercial loans secured by either commercial real estate or residential real estate are originated primarily within the Eastern Pennsylvania market area, are within the Bank’s underwriting criteria, and generally include the guarantee of the borrowers. Repayment of this kind of loan is dependent upon either the ongoing cash flow of the borrowing entity or the resale of or lease of the subject property. Commercial real estate and commercial construction loans may be affected to a greater extent than residential loans by adverse conditions in real estate markets or the economy because commercial real estate borrowers’ ability to repay their loans depends on successful development of their properties.

 

Loans to state and political subdivisions are tax-exempt or taxable loans to municipalities, school districts and housing and industrial development authorities. These loans can be general obligations of the municipality or school district repaid through their taxing authority, revenue obligations repaid through the income generated by the operations of the authority, such as a water or sewer authority, or loans issued to a housing and industrial development agency, for which a private corporation is responsible for payments on the loans.

 

Indirect lease financing receivables represent loans to small businesses and individuals that are collateralized by equipment. These loans tend to have higher risk characteristics but generally provide higher rates of return. These loans are originated by a third party and purchased by QNB based on criteria specified by QNB. The criteria include minimum credit scores of the borrower, term of the lease, type and age of equipment financed and geographic area. The geographic area primarily represents states contiguous to Pennsylvania. QNB is not the lessor and does not service these loans.

 

 
- 3129 -

 

 

The Company originates fixed rate and adjustable-rate residential real estate loans that are secured by the underlying 1-to-4 family residential properties. Credit risk exposure in this area of lending is minimized by the evaluation of the credit worthiness of the borrower, including debt-to-income ratios, credit scores and adherence to underwriting policies that emphasize conservative loan-to-value ratios of generally no more than 80%. To reduce interest rate risk, substantially all originations of fixed-rate loans to individuals for 1-4 family residential mortgages with maturities of 15 years or greater are sold in the secondary market. With the increase in mortgage rates since the middle of 2013 that continued to mid-2014, mortgage loan origination activity has slowed. There were nowas $380,000 in residential mortgage loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2013. At2014 and no mortgages held-for sale at December 31, 2012 real estate residential loans held-for-sale were $1,616,000.2013. These loans are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market.

 

The home equity portfolio consists of fixed-rate home equity loans and variable rate home equity lines of credit. These loans are often in a junior lien position and therefore carry a higher risk than first lien 1-4 family residential loans. Risks associated with loans secured by residential properties, either first lien residential mortgages or home equity loans and lines, are generally lower than commercial loans and include general economic risks, such as the strength of the job market, employment stability and the strength of the housing market. Since most loans are secured by a primary or secondary residence, the borrower’s continued employment is the greatest risk to repayment.

 

The Company offers a variety of loans to individuals for personal and household purposes.   During 2013, QNB reentered the private student loan market through a relationship with iHelp. Consumer loans are generally considered to have greater risk than loans secured by residential real estate because they may be unsecured, or, if they are secured, the value of the collateral may be difficult to assess or more likely to decrease in value than real estate. Credit risk in this portfolio is controlled by conservative underwriting standards that consider debt-to-income levels and the creditworthiness of the borrower, and, if secured, the value of the collateral.

 

Loan activity since December 31, 2010 has remained relatively flat as loan payoffs have matched new originations. As a result of struggling economies around the world including in the United States, Europe and China, as well as political, tax and fiscal uncertainty in Washington D.C. businesses appear to be refraining from expanding and are holding off investing in new equipment or any other type of financing and are paying down their lines with excess cash. Consumers have taken advantage of the low interest rates on mortgages and have refinanced higher rate mortgages and consolidated home equity loans but appear to be reluctant to increase debt. As noted earlier loan activity began to show some signs of improvement during the second half of 2013 and particularly in the fourth quarter. While the increase in interest rates midway through the year slowed residential mortgage origination it did not appear to negatively impact business loans or other types of retail loans as the rates being offered remain extremely competitive. Total loans, excluding loans held-for-sale, at December 31, 20132014 were $501,716,000,$555,282,000, an increase of $23,983,000,$53,566,000, or 5.0%10.7%, from December 31, 2012.2013. This follows a 2.5% decline5.0% increase in outstanding loans in 2012 and a growth rate of only 1.6% in 2011.2013. A key financial ratio, is the loanloans to deposit ratio which was 61.6%deposits, improved to 65.2% at December 31, 2013,2014, compared with 59.6%61.6%, at December 31, 2012.2013. QNB continues to be committed to make loans available to credit worthy consumers and businesses.

 

The Allowance for Loan Losses Allocation table shows the percentage composition of the loan portfolio over the past five years. Between 2012 and 2013There was very little change in the makeupcomposition of the portfolio changed slightly with loansbetween the periods ended December 31, 2013 and 2014. Loans secured by commercial real estate represent the largest sector of the portfolio, decreasing from 40.4% of the portfolio at December 31, 2012 to 38.0% of the portfolio at December 31, 2013. Loans secured2013 to 36.7% of the portfolio at December 31, 2014, while balances in this sector grew by commercial real estate decreased by $2,265,000,$12,932,000, or 1.2%6.8%, tofrom $190,602,000 at December 31, 2013 following a 1.5% decrease betweento $203,534,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2012.2014. While loans secured by commercial real estate represent a significant portion of the total portfolio, the collateral is diversified including investment properties, manufacturing facilities, office buildings, hospitals, retirement and nursing home facilities, warehouses and owner-occupied facilities. Commercial real estate loans have drawn the attention of the regulators in recent years as a potential source of risk. As a result, QNB has increased its monitoring of these types of loans including obtaining updated appraisals on loans classified substandard or worse. As detailed in the Allowance for Loan Losses table, QNB had $639,000$70,000 in charge-offs in this category in 20132014 compared with $85,000$639,000 in 2012. Partial charge-offs2013. A partial charge-off of twoa commercial loansloan secured by owner occupieda commercial buildings wherebuilding contributed to this charge off; at December 31, 2014, the business ceased operations contributed $486,000 of the total charge-offs in 2013. Both of these properties were transferred to OREO with one sold in 2013 and the otherproperty was under an agreement of sale.

 

Commercial loans secured by residential real estate increased by $6,669,000,$5,405,000, or 16.3%11.3%, to $47,672,000$53,077,000 at December 31, 2013.2014 and at 9.6% represent a slightly larger share of the overall portfolio at December 31, 2014. These loans representrepresented 9.5% of the portfolio at year-end 2013 compared to 8.6% at year-end 2012.2013. As noted earlier this category includes 1-4 unit residential investment properties that the owner/borrower rents out to tenants. Some of these properties are located outside the Bank’s market area and have experienced vacancies and significant declines in market value. As a result non-accrual loans and charge-offsCharge-offs in this category have increased over the past twothree years. Non-accrual commercial loans secured by residential real estate were $2,829,000$1,467,000 and $2,390,000$2,829,000 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, and loan charge-offs were $401,000$1,069,000 and $111,000,$401,000, respectively, in 20132014 and 2012.

2013. All of the charge-offs in 2014 and 2013 in this category relate to these out of market investment properties. In response, QNB has adjusted its guidelines to originate these types of loans.

 

Commercial and industrial loans, the second largest sector of the portfolio, continues to experience growth increasing $11,276,000,$7,506,000, or 11.3%6.7%, to $111,339,000$118,845,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. This followed growth in this category of $3,900,000,$11,276,000, or 4.1%11.3%, in 2012.2013. Commercial and industrial loans represented 22.2%21.4% of the portfolio at year-end 20132014 compared with 20.9%22.2% at December 31, 2012.2013. As noted earlier this category of loans generally presents a greater risk than loans secured by real estate since these loans are either secured by accounts receivable, inventory or equipment, or unsecured. Losses in commercial and industrial loans were significant during the years 2009-20112010-2011 with charge-offs totaling $1,982,000.$1,300,000. However, in 2014, 2013 and 2012 charge-offs were only$17,000, $68,000, and $101,000, respectively and charge-offs net ofin 2014, recoveries in this segment were only $40,000 and $25,000, respectively.$67,000, exceeding the charge-offs.

 

 
- 3230 -

 

 

Loan Portfolio

                    

December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $118,845  $111,339  $100,063  $96,163  $86,628 

Construction

  23,471   15,929   11,061   15,959   18,611 

Secured by commercial real estate

  203,534   190,602   192,867   195,813   199,874 

Secured by residential real estate

  53,077   47,672   41,003   45,070   44,444 

State and political subdivisions

  44,104   33,773   34,256   35,127   31,053 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   1,250   3,250   4,515   - 

Indirect lease financing

  7,685   8,364   9,685   11,928   12,995 

Retail:

                    

1-4 family residential mortgages

  37,147   29,730   28,733   25,518   23,127 

Home equity loans and lines

  63,213   59,977   54,860   57,579   62,726 

Consumer

  4,175   3,116   2,012   2,308   2,751 

Total loans

  555,251   501,752   477,790   489,980   482,209 

Net unearned costs (fees)

  31   (36)  (57)  (44)  (27)

Loans receivable

 $555,282  $501,716  $477,733  $489,936  $482,182 

 

Loan Portfolio

                    

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

  

2009

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $111,339  $100,063  $96,163  $86,628  $82,512 

Construction

  15,929   11,061   15,959   18,611   27,483 

Secured by commercial real estate

  190,602   192,867   195,813   199,874   166,097 

Secured by residential real estate

  47,672   41,003   45,070   44,444   37,779 

State and political subdivisions

  33,773   34,256   35,127   31,053   26,698 

Loans to depository institutions

  1,250   3,250   4,515   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  8,364   9,685   11,928   12,995   14,061 

Retail:

                    

1-4 family residential mortgages

  29,730   28,733   25,518   23,127   23,929 

Home equity loans and lines

  59,977   54,860   57,579   62,726   67,201 

Consumer

  3,116   2,012   2,308   2,751   3,702 

Total loans

  501,752   477,790   489,980   482,209   449,462 

Net unearned fees

  (36)  (57)  (44)  (27)  (41)

Loans receivable

 $501,716  $477,733  $489,936  $482,182  $449,421 

Loan Maturities and Interest Sensitivity

                                

December 31, 2013

 

One year

or less

  

After one

year through

five years

  

After

five years

  

Total

 

December 31, 2014

 

One year

or less

  

After one

year through

five years

  

After

five years

  

Total

 

Commercial:

                                

Commercial and industrial

 $49,257  $39,160  $22,922  $111,339  $54,693  $36,232  $27,920  $118,845 

Construction

  8,971   790   6,168   15,929   8,249   813   14,409   23,471 

Secured by commercial real estate

  7,359   10,108   173,135   190,602   4,383   11,700   187,451   203,534 

Secured by residential real estate

  2,172   2,070   43,430   47,672   746   2,015   50,316   53,077 

State and political subdivisions

  3,374   1,499   28,900   33,773   45   6,317   37,742   44,104 

Loans to depository institutions

  1,250   -   -   1,250 

Indirect lease financing

  477   7,887   -   8,364   419   7,266   -   7,685 

Retail:

                                

1-4 family residential mortgages

  327   759   28,644   29,730   -   564   36,583   37,147 

Home equity loans and lines

  35,522   5,949   18,506   59,977   7,449   5,430   50,334   63,213 

Consumer

  749   1,539   828   3,116   728   1,655   1,792   4,175 

Total

 $109,458  $69,761  $322,533  $501,752  $76,712  $71,992  $406,547  $555,251 

 

Demand loans and loans with no stated schedule of repayment and no stated maturity are included in one year or less.

 

The following shows the amount of loans due after one year that have fixed interest rates and variable or adjustable interest rates at December 31, 2013:2014:

Loans with fixed predetermined interest rates:

 $83,731 

Loans with variable or adjustable interest rates:

 $308,563 

Loans with fixed predetermined interest rates:      $86,552,000   

Loans with variable or adjustable interest rates:  $391,987,000

 

For the first time since 2009 constructionConstruction loans increased 47.3% from $11,061,000, or 2.3% of the portfolio at December 31, 2012 to $15,929,000, or 3.2% of the portfolio at December 31, 2013.2013, to $23,471,000, or 4.2% of the portfolio at December 31, 2014. These loans are primarily to developers and builders for the construction of residential units or commercial buildings or to businesses for the construction of owner-occupied facilities. This portfolio is diversified among different types of collateral including: 1-4 family residential construction, medical and retirement home facilities, office buildings, hotels and land for development loans. Construction loans are generally made only on projects that have municipal approval. These loans are usually originated to include a short construction period followed by permanent financing provided through a commercial mortgage after construction is complete. Once construction is complete the balance is moved to the secured by commercial real estate category if the permanent financing is provided by the Bank. The growth in the portfolio in 20132014 is primarily related to the Bank’s participation in a large project to improve downtown Allentown, Pennsylvania.Pennsylvania, which started in 2013, as well as construction loans for a number of business expansions in the Bank’s market footprint. There were no charge-offs in the construction loan portfolio in 2013 or 2012since 2011 and construction loans on nonaccrualnon-accrual continue to improve declining from $1,319,000 a December 31, 2013 to $1,319,000$337,000 at December 31, 2013 from $2,480,000 and $3,474,000 at December 2012 and 2011, respectively.2014.

 

 
- 3331 -

 

 

Loans to state and political subdivisions decreasedincreased from $34,256,000 at December 31, 2012 to $33,773,000 at December 31, 2013 to $44,104,000 at December 31, 2014, an increase of $10,331,000, or 30.6%. This sector grew from 6.7% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2013 to 7.9% at December 31, 2014. The strong growth in 2014 followed a decrease of $483,000, or 1.4%. This followed a decrease of $871,000, or 2.5%, between 20112012 and 2012.2013. With the significant decline in interest rates many municipalities, counties and school districts are refinancing their existing bonds or bank debt. As a result, QNB is getting an opportunity to bid on many of these local issues and has been successful in winning several of those bids. However, during the process QNBThe refinancing activity has also lost some outstanding balances as the decisions by the municipalities is primarily interest rate driven.resulted in a reduction in yield. QNB expects the balance in this category to increase in 20142015 as some of the bids wonplaced during 2013 are anticipated to2014 may fund during the first quarter. Another resultquarter of the refinancing activity is a reduction in yield and interest income earned.2015.

 

At December 31, 2013, indirectIndirect lease financing receivables represent approximately 1.7%experienced a fifth consecutive year of the portfolio compared to 2.0% of the portfolio at December 31, 2012. Total balances in this portfolio declined todeclining balances. Balances dropped $679,000 from $8,364,000 at December 31, 2013 from $9,685,000to $7,685,000 at December 31, 2012.2014. These lease financing receivables were purchased from two third party sources. This portfolio contains leases to government agencies and universities as well as to industries hit hard by the slowdown in the economy: trucking, landscaping and construction. As a result of a high level of charge-offs and delinquency in this portfolio in 2008 and 2009, QNB strengthened its underwriting standards with regard to this portfolio. On the positive, theThis tightening of underwriting standards has resulted in a reduction in net charge-offs and the balance of non-performing leases. QNB experienced net charge-offs of $25,000 in 2014 and a net recovery of $28,000 in 2013 compared with net charge-offs in this portfolio of only $49,000 and $2,000 in 2012 and 2011, respectively.2013. Non-performing assets, including repossessed equipment and non-accrual lease financing receivables, were $37,000$21,000 and $108,000$37,000 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, respectively. On the negative, theThe tightening of underwriting standards, as well as the elimination of one of the third party sources, has also resulted in the purchase of fewer leases. Indirect lease financing balances have declined over the past five years from $14,061,000 at December 31, 2009 to $8,364,000 at year-end 2013.

 

QNB desires to become the “local consumer lender of choice” and to affect this QNB has refocused its retail lending efforts by strengthening the management of the area, adding new product offerings and by increasing marketing and promotion. The positive results of thisThis renewed focus can be seenresulted in the category ofincreased balances in home equity loans and lines which increased $5,117,000,of $3,236,000, or 9.3%5.4%, to $59,977,000$63,213,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. During 2013,2014, in an effort to increase demand, QNB offered very attractive rates on both variable and fixed rate home equity loans and lines. These promotional rates along with excellent customer service including quick turnaround time contributed to the growth in home equity balances. With the rise in mortgage interest rates and an improvement in home values and improving local economy, it is expected that the demand for home equity loans will continue to improve.

 

Consumer loans is another category that benefited from the renewed focus with balances increasing $1,104,000,$1,059,000, or 54.9%34.0%, to $3,116,000$4,175,000 at December 31, 2013. As noted earlier, during2014. During the fourth quarter of 2013, QNB reentered the private student loan market through a relationship with iHelp. These student loans are either fixed or variable rate with the rate dependent on the credit scores of the student and/or the cosigner. Principal and interest protection is provided by ReliaMax, an insurance company for private student loans. As of December 31, 20132014 the balance of student loans was $214,000.$907,000. Also contributing to the increase in consumer loan balances was competitive pricing on automobile loans.

 

DespiteQNB increased the increase in mortgage rates and the slowdown in mortgage originations, QNB was able to increase the balancebalances of residential mortgage loans secured by first lien 1-4 family residential mortgages by $997,000,$7,417,000, or 3.5%24.9%, to $29,730,000$37,147,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. This followed an increase of $3,215,000,$997,000, or 12.6%3.5%, between December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2012. Given the low yields on alternative investment securities management decided to retain2013. In 2014, QNB retained some 15 yearadjustable rate mortgages to borrowers with high credit scores and low loan to value ratios.

 

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets include non-performing loans, OREO and repossessed assets and non-performing trust preferred securities. As referenced inNon-performing assets declined for the following table the levels of non-performing assets, particularly non-accrual loans, trended higher between 2009 and 2011. In 2012, asset quality stabilized and in 2013 asset quality improved. Total non-performing assets were $20,308,000 at December 31, 2013,third consecutive year, totaling $18,152,000 or 2.18%, of total assets compared to $24,273,000, or 2.64%1.86% of total assets at December 31, 2012.2014. This is down $2,156,000 from $20,308,000, or 2.18% of total assets at December 31, 2013. Included in non-performing assets in 2014 and 2013 is $2,439,000 and 2012 is $2,069,000, and $1,962,000, respectively, of pooled trust preferred securities, discussed in the section titled “Investment Securities and Other Short-Term Investments”. The slight increase in the amount of non-performing pooled trust preferred securities is a result of the increase in the fair value of these securities, not as a result of the classification of additional securities.

 

Total non-performing loans, which represent loans on non-accrual status, loans past due more than 90 days or more and still accruing interest and troubled debt restructured loans were $15,414,000,$12,667,000 or 2.28% of total loans at December 31, 2014 compared with $15,413,000, or 3.07% of total loans at December 31, 2013 compared with $21,150,000, or 4.43% of total loans, at December 31, 2012.2013. Loans on non-accrual status were $13,455,000$10,770,000 at December 31, 20132014 compared with $18,572,000$13,453,000 at December 31, 2012. Most of the2013. The reduction in non-accrual loans can be attributed to improved financial performanceis the result of approximately $4,300,000 in payments and $1,100,000 in charge-offs which was partially offset by several borrowers which enabled these loans to be placed back on accrual status. the designation of a large relationship as non-accrual in the fourth quarter 2014.In cases where there is a collateral shortfall on non-accrual loans, specific impairment reserves have been established based on updated collateral values even if the borrower continues to pay in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Of the total amount of non-accrual loans at December 31, 2013, $11,126,000,2014, $5,418,000, or 82.7%50.3% of the loans classified as non-accrual, are current or past due less than 30 days as of the end of the year.

- 34 -

 

QNB had $1,000 inno loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing at December 30, 2013 and no31, 2014, compared to $1,000 in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing at December 31, 2012.2013. Total loans that are 30 days or more past due decreased and representedincreased $1,317,000 to $6,703,000, representing 1.21% of total loans at December 31, 2014 compared with 1.07% of total loans at December 31, 2013 compared with 1.50% of total loans at December 31, 2012.2013. Restructured loans, as defined in accounting guidance for troubled debt restructuring in ASC 310-40, that have not already been included in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing or in non-accrual loans totaled $1,960,000$1,897,000 and $2,578,000$1,960,000 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively.

 

OREO and repossessed assets are in the “Other Assets” category on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. OREO totaled $2,825,000$3,025,000 and $1,151,000$2,825,000 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. Included in OREO at December 31, 20132014 is one commercial property with a fair value of $2,325,000 that iswas under agreement of sale and should settle during the second quarter of 2014 andsettled in January 2015, a participation in a construction project with a fair value of $500,000.$500,000, as well as two residential properties. OREO at December 31, 2012 included two residential loan2013 consisted of the same commercial property and construction projects and a commercial building.participation in the December 31, 2014 balance. Repossessed assets, which primarily includes commercial trucks and equipment from the indirect leasing portfolio, was $10,000totaled $21,000 at December 31, 2012.2014. There were no repossessed assets as of December 31, 2013.

 

- 32 -

 

Non-Performing Assets

                                        

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

  

2009

  

2014

  

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

 

Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing

                    

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

  -  $-   -   -   -  $-   -  $-   -   - 

Construction

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Secured by commercial real estate

  -   -  $286  $259  $709   -   -   -  $286  $259 

Secured by residential real estate

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

State and political subdivisions

  -   -   40   9   -   -   -   -   40   9 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  -   -   54   -   45   -   -   -   54   - 

Retail:

  -   -               -   -   -         

1-4 family residential mortgages

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Home equity loans and lines

  -   -   -   -   5   -   -   -   -   - 

Consumer

 $1   -   -   -   -   -  $1   -   -   - 

Total loans past due 90 days or more and accruing

  1   -   380   268   759   -   1   -   380   268 
                                        

Non-accrual loans

                    

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

  3,956   6,174   5,410   1,082   486   2,171   3,956   6,174   5,410   1,082 

Construction

  1,319   2,480   3,474   1,334   1,342   337   1,319   2,480   3,474   1,334 

Secured by commercial real estate

  4,630   6,748   7,547   3,837   354   6,465   4,630   6,748   7,547   3,837 

Secured by residential real estate

  2,829   2,390   1,158   97   375   1,467   2,829   2,390   1,158   97 

State and political subdivisions

  -   1   4   -   -   -   -   1   4   - 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  37   98   121   255   306   -   37   98   121   255 

Retail:

                                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  401   335   515   433   -   225   401   335   515   433 

Home equity loans and lines

  265   346   368   145   223   104   265   346   368   145 

Consumer

  16   -   -   -   -   1   16   -   -   - 

Total non-accrual loans

  13,453   18,572   18,597   7,183   3,086   10,770   13,453   18,572   18,597   7,183 
                                        

Restructured loans, not included above

  1,960   2,578   2,413   2,421   2,257   1,897   1,960   2,578   2,413   2,421 

Other real estate owned

  2,825   1,151   826   75   -   3,025   2,825   1,151   826   75 

Repossessed assets

  -   10   -   15   67   21   -   10   -   15 

Non-accrual pooled trust preferred securities

  2,069   1,962   1,929   1,672   863   2,439   2,069   1,962   1,929   1,672 

Total non-performing assets

 $20,308  $24,273  $24,145  $11,634  $7,032  $18,152  $20,308  $24,273  $24,145  $11,634 

Total as a percent of total assets

  2.18%  2.64%  2.78%  1.44%  0.92%  1.86%  2.18%  2.64%  2.78%  1.44%

 

Additional loan quality information can be found in Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Management’s view is that loans classified as substandard or doubtful that are not included in the past due, non-accrual or restructured categories are potential problem loans. For some of these loans theremanagement may be known information abouthave knowledge of possible credit problems that will cause management to be uncertain as toquestion the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms. In addition to the marked improvement in total non-performing loans, commercial loans classified as substandard or doubtful, which includes non-performing loans, continue to improve. At December 31, 20132014 substandard or doubtful loans totaled $38,823,000,$34,354,000, a reduction of $6,691,000,$4,469,000 or 14.7%11.5%, from the $45,514,000$38,823,000 reported as of December 31, 2012.2013.

 

- 35 -

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s best estimate of the known and inherent losses in the existing loan portfolio. Management believes that it uses the best information available to make determinations about the adequacy of the allowance and that it has established its existing allowance for loan losses in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The determination of an appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses is based upon an analysis of the risks inherent in QNB’s loan portfolio. Management, in determining the allowance for loan losses makes significant estimates and assumptions. Since the allowance for loan losses is dependent, to a great extent, on conditions that may be beyond QNB’s control, it is at least reasonably possible that management’s estimates of the allowance for loan losses and actual results could differ. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review QNB’s allowance for losses on loans. Such agencies may require QNB to recognize changes to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Actual loan losses, net of recoveries, serve to reduce the allowance.

 

- 33 -

Management closely monitors the quality of its loan portfolio and performs a quarterly analysis of the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses and the level of unallocated reserves. This analysis considers a number of relevant factors including: specific impairment reserves, historical loan loss experience, general economic conditions, levels of and trends in delinquent and non-performing loans, levels of classified loans, trends in the growth rate of loans and concentrations of credit.

 

Economic conditions during the financial crisis and recession contributed to high rates of unemployment and a sharp decline in the residential and commercial real estate markets. These factors had a negative impact on both consumers and small businesses and contributed to higher than historical levels of net charge-offs, specific reserves and non-performing, impaired and classified loans. As a result higher provisions for loan losses were taken to bring the allowance for loan losses to adequate levels to support the decline in asset quality. Since December 31, 2008, the start of the financial crisis, QNB has increased its allowance for loan losses from $3,836,000, or 0.95% of total loans, to $8,925,000,$8,001,000 or 1.78%1.44% of total loans at December 31, 2013. Over the past year2014. During 2014, economic conditions and asset quality have improved allowing for reduced provision for loan losses and a reduction in the required allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses was $9,772,000,$8,925,000, or 2.05%1.78% of total loans at December 31, 2012.2013.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses Allocation

Allowance for Loan Losses Allocation

 

Allowance for Loan Losses Allocation

 

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

  

2009

  

2014

  

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

 
 

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

  

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

  

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

  

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

  

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

  

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

  

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

  

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

  

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

  

Amount

  

Percent

gross

loans

 

Balance at end of period applicable to:

                                                                                

Commercial:

                                                                                

Commercial and industrial

 $2,044   22.2% $2,505   20.9% $2,959   19.6% $2,136   18.0% $1,601   18.4% $1,892   21.4% $2,044   22.2% $2,505   20.9% $2,959   19.6% $2,136   18.0%

Construction

  439   3.2   209   2.3   556   3.3   633   3.9   382   6.1   297   4.2   439   3.2   209   2.3   556   3.3   633   3.9 

Secured by commercial real estate

  2,898   38.0   3,795   40.4   3,124   40.0   3,875   41.4   2,038   37.0   2,700   36.7   2,898   38.0   3,795   40.4   3,124   40.0   3,875   41.4 

Secured by residential real estate

  1,632   9.5   1,230   8.6   746   9.2   676   9.2   549   8.4   1,630   9.6   1,632   9.5   1,230   8.6   746   9.2   676   9.2 

State and political subdivisions

  186   6.7   260   7.2   195   7.2   108   6.4   125   5.9   221   7.9   186   6.7   260   7.2   195   7.2   108   6.4 

Loans to depository institutions

  4   0.2   15   0.7   20   0.9   -   0.0   -   0.0   -   -   4   0.2   15   0.7   20   0.9   -   0.0 

Indirect lease financing

  103   1.7   168   2.0   312   2.4   496   2.7   673   3.1   93   1.4   103   1.7   168   2.0   312   2.4   496   2.7 

Retail:

                                                                                

1-4 family residential mortgages

  303   5.9   324   6.0   249   5.2   212   4.8   153   5.3   312   6.7   303   5.9   324   6.0   249   5.2   212   4.8 

Home equity loans and lines

  583   12.0   582   11.5   625   11.7   646   13.0   420   15.0   453   11.4   583   12.0   582   11.5   625   11.7   646   13.0 

Consumer

  64   0.6   27   0.4   20   0.5   32   0.6   61   0.8   85   0.7   64   0.6   27   0.4   20   0.5   32   0.6 

Unallocated

  669       657       435       141       215       318       669       657       435       141     

Total

 $8,925   100.0% $9,772   100.0% $9,241   100.0% $8,955   100.0% $6,217   100.0% $8,001   100.0% $8,925   100.0% $9,772   100.0% $9,241   100.0% $8,955   100.0%

 

Gross loans represent loans before unamortized net loan fees and costs. Percent gross loans lists the percentage of each loan type to total loans.

 

A loan is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that QNB will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally aremay not be classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial loans and indirect lease financing loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the recorded investment in loans for which impairment has been identified totaled $27,617,000$21,077,000 and $32,304,000,$27,617,000, respectively, of which $21,599,000$19,019,000 and $23,771,000,$22,515,000, respectively, required no specific allowance for loan loss. The recorded investment in impaired loans requiring an allowance for loan losses was $6,018,000$2,058,000 and $8,533,000$5,102,000 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 the related allowance for loan losses associated with these loans was $1,194,000 and $2,022,000, and $2,701,000, respectively. Most of the loans that have been identified as impaired are collateral-dependent. See Note 5 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional detail of impaired loans.

 

 
- 3634 -

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

                                        
 

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

  

2009

  

2014

  

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2010

 

Allowance for loan losses:

                                        

Balance, January 1

 $9,772  $9,241  $8,955  $6,217  $3,836  $8,925  $9,772  $9,241  $8,955  $6,217 
                                        

Charge-offs

                                        

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

  68   101   732   568   682   17   68   101   732   568 

Construction

  -   -   634   -   -   -   -   -   634   - 

Secured by commercial real estate

  639   85   941   278   -   70   639   85   941   278 

Secured by residential real estate

  401   111   54   113   -   1,069   401   111   54   113 

State and political subdivisions

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  2   85   43   254   645   39   2   85   43   254 

Retail:

                                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  -   21   -   -   -   95   -   21   -   - 

Home equity loans and lines

  234   114   77   60   527   156   234   114   77   60 

Consumer

  77   64   26   54   80   167   77   64   26   54 

Total charge-offs

  1,421   581   2,507   1,327   1,934   1,613   1,421   581   2,507   1,327 

Recoveries

                                        

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

  28   76   22   13   4   67   28   76   22   13 

Construction

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Secured by commercial real estate

  1   76   13   -   -   3   1   76   13   - 

Secured by residential real estate

  60   -   -   -   -   48   60   -   -   - 

State and political subdivisions

  1   -   -   -   -   -   1   -   -   - 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  30   36   41   218   96   14   30   36   41   218 

Retail:

                                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  -   2   -   -   -   1   -   2   -   - 

Home equity loans and lines

  28   12   4   -   27   110   28   12   4   - 

Consumer

  26   10   13   34   38   46   26   10   13   34 

Total recoveries

  174   212   93   265   165   289   174   212   93   265 

Net charge-offs

  (1,247)  (369)  (2,414)  (1,062)  (1,769)  (1,324)  (1,247)  (369)  (2,414)  (1,062)

Provision for loan losses

  400   900   2,700   3,800   4,150   400   400   900   2,700   3,800 

Balance, December 31

 $8,925  $9,772  $9,241  $8,955  $6,217  $8,001  $8,925  $9,772  $9,241  $8,955 
                                        

Total loans (excluding loans held-for-sale)

                                        

Average

 $482,112  $480,068  $476,612  $466,524  $426,768  $523,825  $482,112  $480,068  $476,612  $466,524 

Year-end

  501,716   477,733   489,936   482,182   449,421   555,282   501,716   477,733   489,936   482,182 
                                        

Ratios:

                                        

Net charge-offs to:

                                        

Average loans

  0.26%  0.08%  0.51%  0.23%  0.41%  0.25%  0.26%  0.08%  0.51%  0.23%

Loans at year-end

  0.25   0.08   0.49   0.22   0.39   0.24   0.25   0.08   0.49   0.22 

Allowance for loan losses

  13.97   3.78   26.13   11.86   28.45   16.55   13.97   3.78   26.13   11.86 

Provision for loan losses

  311.75   41.00   89.44   27.95   42.63   331.00   311.75   41.00   89.44   27.95 
                                        

Allowance for loan losses to:

                                        

Average loans

  1.85%  2.04%  1.94%  1.92%  1.46%  1.53%  1.85%  2.04%  1.94%  1.92%

Loans at year-end

  1.78   2.05   1.89   1.86   1.38   1.44   1.78   2.05   1.89   1.86 

 

 
- 3735 -

 

 

QNB had net loan charge-offs of $1,324,000, or 0.25% of average loans for 2014 compared to $1,247,000, or 0.26% of average total loans for 2013. One commercial real estate property, now under agreement of sale, was charged off in the amount of $70,000, management’s estimate of the shortfall from sale proceeds and book balance. The leasing portfolio’s charge-offs totaled $39,000 in 2014 and one commercial and industrial loan was charged off for $17,000. The majority of charge-offs recorded during 2014 had specific reserves established during the allowance for loan loss calculation process prior to the ultimate decision to charge-off the loan. Twenty-seven out of market residential investment property loans accounted for $1,069,000 of gross charge-offs of $1,613,000 in 2014. The remaining charge-offs totaling $418,000 are from the retail portfolio. For 2013, compared to $369,000, or 0.08% of average total loans for 2012. Partialpartial charge-offs of two commercial loans secured by owner occupied commercial buildings where the business ceased operations contributed $486,000 of the total charge-offs in 2013.charge-offs. Both of these properties were transferred to OREO with one sold in 2013 and the other under agreement of sale.sold in January 2015. In addition, thirteen out of market residential investment property loans accounted for another $401,000 of the charge-offs in 2013. The majority of charge-offs recorded during 2013 had specific reserves established during the allowance for loan loss calculation process prior to the ultimate decision to charge-off the loan. For 2012, commercial loans and leases account for $297,000 and $85,000, respectively of the $581,000 in loans charged off. The retail loan portfolio contributed the remaining $199,000 of loan charge-offs in 2012 with home equity loans and lines accounting for $114,000 of the total.

 

Management believes the allowance for loan losses of $8,925,000$8,001,000 is adequate as of December 31, 20132014 in relation to the estimate of known and inherent losses in the portfolio.

 

Premises and equipment

Premises and equipment, net of depreciation decreased $173,000 to $9,702,000 at December 31, 2014.

Other assets

The category of other assets decreased $2,283,000 from $10,365,000 at December 31, 2013 to $8,082,000 at December 31, 2014. Most of the increase in other assets relates to the change in the deferred tax asset resulting from the change in fair value of the available-for-sale investment portfolio between December 31, 2013 and 2014. The net deferred tax asset was$2,925,000 at December 31, 2014, a decrease of $2,593,000 compared to $5,518,000 at December 31, 2013. The detail of the net deferred tax asset can be found in Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

LIABILITIES

The following table presents total liabilities at the dates indicated:

                 
          

Change from prior year

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

  

Amount

  

Percent

 

Deposits

 $851,592  $814,532  $37,060   4.5%

Short-term borrowings

  35,189   35,156   33   0.1 

Long-term debt

  -   5,000   (5,000)  -100.0 

Accrued interest payable

  344   392   (48)  -12.2 

Other liabilities

  3,656   2,178   1,478   67.9 

Total liabilities

 $890,781  $857,258  $33,523   3.9%

 

Deposits

QNB primarily attracts deposits from within its market area by offering various deposit products. These deposits are in the form of time deposits which include certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts (IRA’s) which have a stated maturity and non-maturity deposit accounts which include: non-interest bearing demand accounts, interest-bearing demand accounts, money market accounts and savings accounts.

 

Total deposits increased $12,894,000,$37,060,000, or 1.6%4.5%, to $814,532,000$851,592,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. This follows an increase of $50,926,000,$12,894,000, or 6.8%1.6%, between 20112012 and 2012. Average deposits increased $23,055,000, or 2.9%, during 2013 compared with $57,427,000, or 7.9%, in 2012.

2013. The growth in deposits as well as the mix of deposits continues to be impacted by customers’ reactions to the industry, regulations and the interest rate environment. Given the low interest rate environment most customers are looking for transaction accounts that provide liquidity and pay a reasonable amount of interest. However, despite the decline in overall time deposit balances, those with maturities of 36 months through 60 months have increased due to some customers seeking a higher rate of interest and not being concerned about liquidity. In addition, with concerns over the safety of their deposits and the strength of their financial institutions, customersCustomers appear to be looking for the safety of FDIC insured deposits and the stability of a strong local community bank. On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted which permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor and non-interest bearing transaction accounts had unlimited deposit insurance up until December 31, 2012. QNB did not experience a significant withdrawal of non-interest bearing transaction accounts due to the expiration of the transaction guarantee program.

 

When comparing balances at December 31, 2014 to 2013, to 2012, interest-bearing and non-interest bearing demand deposits as well as savings accounts increased while money market accounts and time deposits decreased.all categories increased. Similar to the past threefour years, the growth in 20132014 was centered in lower-cost core deposits including interest-bearing demand and savings deposits, accounts with greater liquidity. This growth is consistent with customers seeking the highest rate for the shortest term and the liquidity of a non-maturity account especially in light of the slight rate differential between these deposits and time deposits The Bank currently offers several attractive non-maturity interest-bearing account options that pay very competitive rates and allow the flexibility to add and withdraw funds without penalty.

 

Contributing to the increase in total deposits was growth in non-interest bearing demand accounts which increased $2,302,000,$10,933,000, or 3.1%14.4%, to $75,987,000$86,920,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. This followed growth of $6,835,000,$2,302,000, or 10.2%3.1%, between December 31, 20112012 and December 31, 2012.2013. These deposits are primarily comprised of business checking accounts and are volatile depending on the timing of deposits and withdrawals. Because of this volatility it is often better to compare average balance growth. Average non-interest bearing demand accounts increased $6,272,000,$7,043,000, or 9.3%9.6%, to $73,384,000$80,427,000 when comparing 20132014 to 2012.2013. This compares to an increase of 5.4%9.3% in average balances when comparing 20122013 to 2011.2012. QNB has been very successful in attracting new customers and expanding relationships with existing customers which not only contributes to the increase in balances but also provides an opportunity for fee income.

- 36 -

 

Interest-bearing demand accounts, which includeretail and business interest checking and municipal accounts, increased $45,575,000,$15,076,000, or 23.8%6.4%, to $236,910,000$251,986,000 at December 31, 2013. The2014. While all segments experienced growth in 2014, the majority of the growth was in municipalretail checking, which also comprises the Rewards checking product and checking accounts for individuals over the age of 50, Select 50, which carry higher interest rates. Rewards checking balances increased from $34,969,000 at December 31, 2013 to $39,413,000 at December 31, 2014 and Select 50 balances increased from $53,822,000 to $59,627,000 over this same period. Personal interest-bearing balances also increased from $11,775,000 at December 31, 2013 to $12,908,000 at December 31, 2014. QNB continues to open a significant number of new checking accounts. Municipal deposits, which include school district and township deposits increased $43,747,000,$2,324,000, or 54.7%1.9%, to $123,742,000$126,066,000 at December 31, 2013. This followed growth of $20,978,000, or 35.5%, in 2012.2014. During the past three years QNB has been successful in developing new relationships with several school districts and municipalities as well as expandedexpanding existing relationships with several others. The balances in these accounts are seasonal in nature and can be volatile on a daily basis. Most of the school district taxes are collected during the third quarter of the year and are disbursed over a nine month period. Growth in the high interest Rewards checking product and checking accountsAverage municipal deposits grew $16,226,000, or 15.6% for individuals over the age 50, Select 50, also contributed to the increase in interest-bearing demand accounts. Rewards checking balances increased from $30,790,000 at December 31, 2012 to $34,969,000 at December 31, 2013 and Select 50 balances increased from $52,403,000 to $53,822,000 over this same period. These increases were partially offset by a decline in personal interest-bearing balances2014. The total of $3,487,000 when comparing December 31, 2013 to 2012. As mentioned earlier, QNB continues to open a significant number of new checking accounts. Averageall average interest-bearing demand accounts increased $42,882,000,$25,474,000, or 25.1%11.9%, to $213,697,000 with average interest-bearing municipal accounts increasing $31,850,000, or 43.9%, to $104,314,000$239,171,000 for 2013. 2014.

- 38 -

 

Total savings account balances increased $15,892,000,$4,011,000, or 8.3%1.9%, to $207,229,000$211,240,000 at December 31, 2013. This followed growth of $23,704,000, or 14.1%, in 2012.2014. The increase in savings accounts is attributable to the Online eSavings productstatement savings whose balances increased from $117,871,000$50,090,000 at December 31, 20112013 to $144,813,000$54,682,000 at December 31, 2012 and to $156,840,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. The balance of eSavings account, which was introduced in 2009 to compete with competitors’ online savings products currently yields 0.46%, declined $575,000 to $156,265,000 at a yieldDecember 31, 2014. Rate reductions from 1.85% to 0.45% since the creation of 1.85%. During 2011 the rate was reduced several times and ended the year at 1.00%. The interest rate was further reduced to end 2012 at 0.60% and the rate paid at the end of 2013 was 0.45%. These rate reductionsthis product in 2009 have contributed to a slowdown in the tremendous growth this product experienced after its introduction. After declining for several years, traditional statement savings account balances increased 8.3% from $46,234,000 at December 31, 2012 to $50,090,000 at December 31, 2013.

 

Total time deposit account balances were $239,545,000$243,247,000 at December 31, 2013, a decline2014, an increase of $29,689,000,$3,702,000, or 11.0%1.5%, from the amount reported at December 31, 2012.2013. This followed a decline of $15,790,000,$29,689,000, or 5.5%11.0%, in 2012.2013. As higher yielding time deposits matured during the past two years they were frequently reinvested in the high yielding and liquid Rewards or Select 50 checking, or eSavings account which in many instances paid a rate higher than what was offered on short-term time deposits. After the continued announcements by the Fed beginning in 2011,announced that it would likely leave rates unchanged until 2013 (now 2015)2015 and the yield curve flattened as a result, many customers began looking for the highest yield and opted for a 36- to 60-month time deposit.deposits. Balances in time deposits with a 60 month termthese terms increased $18,696,000, or 16.3%, from $67,175,000$114,913,000 December 31, 2013 to $133,609,000 at December 31, 2011 to $78,840,000 at December 31, 2012 to $86,190,000 at December 31, 2013.2014.

 

To continue to attract and retain deposits, QNB plans to be competitive with respect to rates and to continue to deliver products with terms and features that appeal to customers. The QNB Rewards checking and online eSavings accounts are examples of such products. The continued growth of the full service branch in Colmar and Business Office in Warminster that opened in February 2013 are expected to help further develop new deposit and loan relationships.

 

Maturity of Time Deposits of $100,000 or More

                        

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2014

  

2013

  

2012

 

Three months or less

 $9,808  $13,028  $14,134  $9,599  $9,808  $13,028 

Over three months through six months

  8,983   19,477   9,562   9,043   8,983   19,477 

Over six months through twelve months

  17,350   21,774   23,924   24,207   17,350   21,774 

Over twelve months

  49,601   41,066   51,619   51,571   49,601   41,066 

Total

 $85,742  $95,345  $99,239  $94,420  $85,742  $95,345 

 

Average Deposits by Major Classification

Average Deposits by Major Classification

                                         
 

2013

  

2012

  

2011

  

2014

  

2013

  

2012

 
 

Balance

  

Rate

  

Balance

  

Rate

  

Balance

  

Rate

  

Balance

  

Rate

  

Balance

  

Rate

  

Balance

  

Rate

 

Demand, non-interest bearing

 $73,384   -  $67,112   -  $63,651   -  $80,427   -  $73,384   -  $67,112   - 

Interest-bearing demand

  109,383   0.24%  98,351   0.30%  87,886   0.47%  118,631   0.23%  109,383   0.24%  98,351   0.30%

Municipals interest-bearing demand

  104,314   0.37   72,464   0.50   56,808   0.69   120,540   0.33   104,314   0.37   72,464   0.50 

Money market

  65,744   0.20   77,269   0.30   73,661   0.43   58,333   0.22   65,744   0.20   77,269   0.30 

Savings

  202,053   0.41   188,716   0.60   152,203   0.78   208,629   0.37   202,053   0.41   188,716   0.60 

Time

  162,837   1.16   180,293   1.33   192,231   1.55   151,002   1.08   162,837   1.16   180,293   1.33 

Time of $100,000 or more

  91,124   1.31   101,579   1.43   101,917   1.61   91,522   1.26   91,124   1.31   101,579   1.43 

Total

 $808,839   0.58% $785,784   0.75% $728,357   0.95% $829,084   0.53% $808,839   0.58% $785,784   0.75%

 

Short-term borrowings and long-term debt

Short-term borrowings comprising commercial sweep accounts remained flat, growing $33,000 to $35,189,000 at December 31, 2014. In April 2014, QNB paid off a term repo borrowing from a correspondent bank of $5,000,000.

- 37 -

 

Liquidity

Liquidity represents an institution’s ability to generate cash or otherwise obtain funds at reasonable rates to satisfy demand for loans and deposit withdrawals. QNB attempts to manage its mix of cash and interest-bearing balances, Federal funds sold and investment securities in an attempt to match the volatility, seasonality, interest sensitivity and growth trends of its loans and deposits. The Company manages its liquidity risk by measuring and monitoring its liquidity sources and estimated funding needs. Liquidity is provided from asset sources through repayments and maturities of loans and investment securities. The portfolio of investment securities classified as available for sale and QNB's policy of selling certain residential mortgage originations in the secondary market also provide sources of liquidity. Core deposits and cash management repurchase agreements have historically been the most significant funding source for QNB. These deposits and repurchase agreements are generated from a base of consumers, businesses and public funds primarily located in the Company’s market area.

 

- 39 -

Additional sourcesAn additional source of liquidity areis provided by the Bank’s membership in the FHLB. At December 31, 2013,2014, the Bank had a maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB of approximately $216,920,000.$227,142,000. The maximum borrowing capacity changes as a function of qualifying collateral assets. QNB hashad no outstanding borrowings with the FHLB at December 31, 2014 and 2013. At December 31, 2012, QNB had $4,500,000 in overnight borrowings with the FHLB. In addition, the Bank maintains twothree unsecured Federal funds lines with twothree correspondent banks totaling $26,000,000.$31,000,000. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, there were no outstanding borrowings under these lines. Future availability under these lines is subject to the policies of the granting banks and may be withdrawn. As part of its contingency funding plan, QNB successfully tested its ability to borrow from these sources during the thirdfourth quarter of 2013.2014.

 

Total cash and cash equivalents, trading and available-for-sale securities and loans held-for-sale totaled $398,051,000 at December 31, 2014 and $404,956,000 at December 31, 2013 and $418,571,000 at December 31, 2012.2013. The slight$6,905,000 decrease in liquid sources is primarily the result of a $12,832,000$9,244,000 decrease in trading plus available-for-sale securities which, along with the increase in deposits, helped fund the growth in loans in 2013.2014. These liquid sources should be adequate to meet normal fluctuations in loan demand or deposit withdrawals. Despite the recent increase in interest rates, particularly in the 5 to 10 year part of the yield curve, itIt is still anticipated that the investment portfolio will continue to provide sufficient liquidity as municipal bonds are called and as cash flowprincipal and interest payments on mortgage-backed and CMO securities continues to be steady. In the event thatprovide steady cash flow. An increase in interest rates, however, would continue to increase theresult in decreased cash flow available from the investment portfolio could decrease.portfolio.

 

Approximately $207,868,000$206,774,000 and $170,433,000$207,868,000 of available-for-sale securities at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, were pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements and deposits of public funds. The increase in the amount of pledged securities corresponds with the increase in municipal deposits.

 

As an additional source of liquidity, QNB is a member of the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Services (CDARS) program offered by the Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC. CDARS is a funding and liquidity management tool used by banks to access funds and manage their balance sheet. It enables financial institutions to provide customers with full FDIC insurance on time deposits over $250,000 that are placed in the program. QNB also has available Insured Cash Sweep (ICS), another program through Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC, which is a product similar to CDARS, but one that provides liquidity like a money market or savings account.

 

Other liabilities

The $1,478,000 increase in other liabilities in 2014 consists primarily of purchased, but not settled, marketable securities totaling $1,355,000. QNB purchased three municipal securities with trade dates in December 2014. The securities were funded and delivered in January 2015.

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The following table presents total shareholders’ equity at the dates indicated:

                 
          

Change from prior year

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

  

Amount

  

Percent

 

Common stock

 $2,176  $2,148  $28   1.3%

Surplus

  14,819   13,747   1,072   7.8 

Retained earnings

  70,928   65,618   5,310   8.1 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  907   (3,412)  4,319   126.6 

Treasury stock

  (2,476)  (2,476)  -   - 

Total shareholders' equity

 $86,354  $75,625  $10,729   14.2%

Total shareholders’ equity increased $10,729,000, or 14.2%, to $86,354,000 at December 31, 2014 with retained earnings -- net income less dividends paid -- contributing $5,310,000 and the dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan, employee stock purchase plan and stock option plan contributing $988,000. Accumulated other comprehensive income increased $4,319,000 resulting from the increase in fair value of the available-for-sale investment portfolio caused by decreasing interest rates in 2014. QNB remains “well capitalized” based on FDIC requirements.

 

Capital Adequacy

A strong capital position is fundamental to support continued growth and profitability and to serve the needs of depositors. QNB’s shareholders’ equity at December 31, 20132014 was $75,625,000,$86,354,000, or 8.11%8.84% of total assets, compared to shareholders’ equity of $77,623,000,$75,625,000, or 8.44%8.11% of total assets, at December 31, 2012.2013. Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2014 included a positive adjustment of $907,000 related to unrealized holding gains, net of taxes, on investment securities available for sale while shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2013 included a negative adjustment of $3,412,000, related to unrealized holding losses, net of taxes, on investment securities available for sale while shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2012 included a positive adjustment of $4,456,000, related to unrealized holding gains, net of taxes, on investment securities available-for-sale. WithoutExcluding these adjustments, shareholders’ equity to total assets would have been 8.44%8.75% and 7.99%8.44% at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, respectively.

- 38 -

 

Average shareholders’ equity and average total assets were $76,663,000$82,623,000 and $923,188,000$947,864,000 for 2013,2014, an increase of 9.2%7.8% and 3.3%2.7%, respectively, from 20122013 average equity and average total assets of $70,196,000$76,663,000 and $893,476,000,$923,188,000, respectively. The ratio of average total equity to total average assets was 8.72% for 2014, compared to 8.30% for 2013, compared to 7.86% for 2012.2013.

 

QNB is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to its shareholders pursuant to the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law as amended (the BCL). The BCL operates generally to preclude dividend payments, if the effect thereof would render QNB insolvent, as defined. As a practical matter, QNB’s payment of dividends is contingent upon its ability to obtain funding in the form of dividends from the Bank. Under Pennsylvania banking law, the Bank is subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that it may declare without prior regulatory approval. At December 31, 2013, $70,742,0002014, $76,232,000 of retained earnings was available for dividends without prior regulatory approval, subject to the regulatory capital requirements discussed below. QNB paid dividends to its shareholders of $1.12 per share and $1.08 per share in 2014 and $1.04 per share in 2013, and 2012, respectively.

 

QNB is subject to various regulatory capital requirements as issued by Federal regulatory authorities. Regulatory capital is defined in terms of Tier 1 capital (shareholders’ equity excluding unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities and disallowed intangible assets), Tier 2 capital which includes the allowable portion of the allowance for loan losses which is limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and a portion of the unrealized gains on equity securities, and total capital (Tier 1 plus Tier 2). Risk-based capital ratios are expressed as a percentage of risk-weighted assets. Risk-weighted assets are determined by assigning various weights to all assets and off-balance sheet arrangements, such as letters of credit and loan commitments, based on associated risk. Regulators have also adopted minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio standards, which measure the ratio of Tier I capital to total quarterly average assets.

 

The minimum regulatory capital ratios are 4.00% for Tier 1 capital, 8.00% for total risk-based capital and 4.00% for leverage. Under the requirements, at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, QNB has a Tier 1 capital ratio of 12.68%12.79% and 12.33%12.68%, a total risk-based ratio of 14.01%14.06% and 13.60%14.01%, and a leverage ratio of 8.45%8.65% and 7.96%8.45%, respectively. All regulatory capital ratios have improved from December 31, 20122013 as the growth rate of Tier I and total risk based capital has exceeded the growth rate of risk-weighted and quarterly average assets.

 

Continuing to impact risk-weighted assets is the $27,260,000$26,451,000 of risk-weighted assets due to mezzanine tranches of pooled trust preferred securities that were downgraded below investment grade during the first quarter of 2009. Although the amortized cost of these securities was only $3,276,000$3,519,000 at December 31, 2013,2014, regulatory guidance required an additional $23,984,000$22,932,000 to be included in risk-weighted assets. The Bank utilized the method as outlined in the Call Report Instructions for an available-for-sale bond that has not triggered the Low Level Exposure (LLE) rule. The mezzanine tranches of CDOs that utilized this method of risk-weighting are five out of sevensix pooled trust preferred securities (PreTSLs) held by the Bank as of December 31, 2013.2014. The other two pooled trust preferred securities havesecurity has only one tranche remaining so the treatment noted above does not apply.

- 40 -

 

QNB offers a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) to provide participants a convenient and economical method for investing cash dividends paid on the Company’s common stock in additional shares at a discount. The Plan also allows participants to make additional cash purchases of stock at a discount. Stock purchases under the Plan contributed $823,000$749,000 and $912,000$823,000 to capital during 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively.

 

The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 100,000 shares of QNB’s common stock in open market or privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase authorization does not bear a termination date. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, 57,883 shares were repurchased under this authorization at an average price of $16.97 and a total cost of $982,000. There were no shares repurchased under the plan since the first quarter of 2009.

 

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 established five capital level designations ranging from “well capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized.” At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, management believes that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject and have met the “well-capitalized” criterion which requires minimum Tier I and total risk-based capital ratios of 6.00% and 10.00%, respectively, and a leverage ratio of 5.00%.

 

In July 2013, the Federal bank regulatory agencies adopted final rules that revise the agencies’ capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules. These final rules were designed to enhance such requirements and implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly referred to as Basel III.

The final rules generally implement higher minimum capital requirements, add a new common equity tier 1 capital requirement, and establish criteria that instruments must meet to be considered common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital or tierTier 2 capital. The new minimum capital to risk-adjusted assets requirements are a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% (6.5% to be considered “well capitalized”) and a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, increased from 4.0% (and increased from 6.0% to 8.0% to be considered “well capitalized”); the total capital ratio remains at 8.0% under the new rules (10.0% to be considered “well capitalized”). Under the new rules, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity Tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets. The new minimum capital requirements are effective on January 1, 2015. The capital contributionconservation buffer requirements phase in over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2016.

- 39 -

 

QNB will continue to analyze these new rules and their effects on the business, operations and capital levels of the Company and the Bank. The following table summarizes QNB’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital position at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

Capital Analysis

                

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Tier 1

                

Shareholders' equity

 $75,625  $77,623  $86,354  $75,625 

Net unrealized securities losses (gains), net of tax

  3,412   (4,456)

Total Tier 1 risk-based capital

  79,037   73,167 

Net unrealized securities (gains) losses, net of tax

  (907)  3,412 

Disallowed goodwill and other disallowed intangible assets

  (8)  - 

Total Tier I risk-based capital

  85,439   79,037 
                

Tier 2

                

Allowable portion: Allowance for loan losses

  7,806   7,449 

Allowable portion: Allowance for loan losses and reserve forunfunded commitments

  8,060   7,806 

Unrealized gains on equity securities, net of tax

  487   142   428   487 

Total risk-based capital

 $87,330  $80,758  $93,927  $87,330 

Risk-weighted assets

 $623,389  $593,630  $667,818  $623,389 

Quarterly average assets

 $935,477  $919,040 

Quarterly average assets for leverage capital purposes

 $987,527  $935,477 

 

Capital Ratios

                

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Tier 1 capital/risk-weighted assets

  12.68%  12.33%  12.79%  12.68%

Total risk-based capital/risk-weighted assets

  14.01%  13.60%  14.06%  14.01%

Tier 1 capital/average assets (leverage ratio)

  8.45%  7.96%  8.65%  8.45%

 

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of recently issued accounting standards.

 

- 41 -

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Disclosure of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements. Additional information is contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the most sensitive of these issues. The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based on the consolidated financial statements of QNB, which are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and predominant practices within the banking industry. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires QNB to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. QNB evaluates estimates on an on-going basis, including those related to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the determination of the valuation of other real estate owned, other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities, the determination of impairment of restricted bank stock, the valuation of deferred tax assets, stock-based compensation and income taxes. QNB bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

Other-than-Temporary Investment Security Impairment

Securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reasons underlying the decline, to determine whether the loss in value is other-than-temporary. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospect for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. For equity securities, once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of the equity security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized.

 

The Company follows the accounting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320-10 as it relates to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). This accounting guidance specifies that (a) if a company does not have the intent to sell a debt security prior to recovery and (b) it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery, the security would not be considered other-than-temporarily impaired unless there is a credit loss. When an entity does not intend to sell the security, and it is more likely than not, the entity will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it will recognize the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. For held to maturity debt securities, the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income for the non-credit portion of a previous other-than-temporary impairment should be amortized prospectively over the remaining life of the security on the basis of the timing of future estimated cash flows of the security.

- 40 -

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

QNB considers that the determination of the allowance for loan losses involves a higher degree of judgment and complexity than its other significant accounting policies. The allowance for loan losses is calculated with the objective of maintaining a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb probable known and inherent losses in the outstanding loan portfolio. The allowance is reduced by actual credit losses and is increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries of previous losses. The provisions for loan losses are charged to earnings to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level considered necessary by management.

 

The allowance for loan losses is based on management’s continual review and evaluation of the loan portfolio. The level of the allowance is determined by assigning specific reserves to individually identified problem credits and general reserves to all other loans. The portion of the allowance that is allocated to impaired loans is determined by estimating the inherent loss on each credit after giving consideration to the value of underlying collateral. The general reserves are based on the composition and risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, including the nature of the loan portfolio, credit concentration trends, delinquency and loss experience, as well as other qualitative factors such as current economic trends.

 

Management emphasizes loan quality and close monitoring of potential problem credits. Credit risk identification and review processes are utilized in order to assess and monitor the degree of risk in the loan portfolio. QNB’s lending and credit administration staff are charged with reviewing the loan portfolio and identifying changes in the economy or in a borrower’s circumstances which may affect the ability to repay debt or the value of pledged collateral. A loan classification and review system exists that identifies those loans with a higher than normal risk of collection. Each commercial loan is assigned a grade based upon an assessment of the borrower’s financial capacity to service the debt and the presence and value of collateral for the loan. An independent loan review group tests risk assessments and evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management meets monthly to review the credit quality of the loan portfolio and quarterly to review the allowance for loan losses.

 

In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review QNB’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require QNB to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Management believes that it uses the best information available to make determinations about the adequacy of the allowance and that it has established its existing allowance for loan losses in accordance with GAAP. If circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making determinations, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be affected. Because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, increases to the allowance may be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above.

 

Foreclosed Assets

Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net expenses from foreclosed assets.

 

- 42 -

Stock-Based Compensation

At December 31, 2013,2014, QNB sponsored stock-based compensation plans, administered by a Board committee, under which both qualified and nonqualified stock options may be granted periodically to certain employees. QNB accounts for all awards granted under stock-based compensation plans in accordance with ASC 718,Compensation – Stock Compensation. Compensation cost has been measured using the fair value of an award on the grant date and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis between the grant date for the option and each vesting date. QNB estimates the fair value of stock options on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The model requires the use of numerous assumptions, many of which are highly subjective in nature.

 

Income Taxes

QNB accounts for income taxes under the asset/liability method in accordance with income tax accounting guidance, ASC 740 – Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets when, in the judgment of management, it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not become available. Because the judgment about the level of future taxable income is dependent to a great extent on matters that may, at least in part, be beyond QNB’s control, it is at least reasonably possible that management’s judgment about the need for a valuation allowance for deferred taxes could change in the near term.

 

- 41 -

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the

Not applicable to Company is not required to respond to this item.for fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

 

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The following audited financial statements are set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K on the following pages:

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Page 4443

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Page 45

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

Page 46

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Page 47

 

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

Page 48

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Page 49

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page 50

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

March 13, 2015

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, in relation to criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting as described in “Internal Control Integrated Framework (1992),” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) which was subsequently updated in 2013. Based on this assessment, management concludes that, as of December 31, 2014, the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting is effective and meets the criteria of the “Internal Control Integrated Framework (1992).”

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, as stated in their reports, which are included herein.

/s/David W. Freeman         

/s/Janice McCracken Erkes               

David W. Freeman   

Janice McCracken Erkes

Chief Executive Officer   

Chief Financial Officer

- 42 -

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

QNB Corp.

We have audited QNB Corp. and subsidiary’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based oncriteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission(COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the entity’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the entity are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the entity; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based oncriteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and our report dated March 13, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP

Allentown, Pennsylvania

March 13, 2015

 
- 43 -

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

QNB Corp.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of QNB Corp. and subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for theseThese consolidated financial statements.statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of QNB Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), QNB Corp. and subsidiary’sinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)issuedby the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 13, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ ParenteBeard LLCBaker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP

Allentown, Pennsylvania

Reading, Pennsylvania
March 31, 201413, 2015

 

 
- 44 -

 

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 (in thousands, except share data) 

(in thousands, except share data)

(in thousands, except share data)

 

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Assets

                

Cash and due from banks

 $12,717  $14,859  $11,102  $12,717 

Interest-bearing deposits in banks

  3,569   594   7,143   3,569 

Total cash and cash equivalents

  16,286   15,453   18,245   16,286 
                

Investment securities

                

Available-for-sale (amortized cost $393,840 and $394,750)

  388,670   401,502 

Held-to-maturity (fair value $162 and $166)

  146   146 

Trading

  4,207   - 

Available-for-sale (amortized cost $373,844 and $393,840)

  375,219   388,670 

Held-to-maturity (fair value $156 and $162)

  146   146 

Restricted investment in bank stocks

  1,764   2,244   647   1,764 

Loans held-for-sale

  -   1,616   380   - 

Loans receivable

  501,716   477,733   555,282   501,716 

Allowance for loan losses

  (8,925)  (9,772)  (8,001)  (8,925)

Net loans

  492,791   467,961   547,281   492,791 

Bank-owned life insurance

  10,407   10,074   10,658   10,407 

Premises and equipment, net

  9,875   8,973   9,702   9,875 

Accrued interest receivable

  2,579   2,803   2,568   2,579 

Other assets

  10,365   9,102   8,082   10,365 

Total assets

 $932,883  $919,874  $977,135  $932,883 
                

Liabilities

                

Deposits

                

Demand, non-interest bearing

 $75,987  $73,685  $86,920  $75,987 

Interest-bearing demand

  236,910   191,335   251,986   236,910 

Money market

  54,861   76,047   58,199   54,861 

Savings

  207,229   191,337   211,240   207,229 

Time

  153,803   173,889   148,827   153,803 

Time of $100,000 or more

  85,742   95,345   94,420   85,742 

Total deposits

  814,532   801,638   851,592   814,532 

Short-term borrowings

  35,156   32,488   35,189   35,156 

Long-term debt

  5,000   5,287   -   5,000 

Accrued interest payable

  392   487   344   392 

Other liabilities

  2,178   2,351   3,656   2,178 

Total liabilities

  857,258   842,251   890,781   857,258 
                

Shareholders' Equity

                

Common stock, par value $0.625 per share;authorized 10,000,000 shares; 3,436,227 shares and 3,392,572shares issued; 3,271,658 and 3,228,003 shares outstanding

  2,148   2,121 

Common stock, par value $0.625 per share; authorized 10,000,000 shares; 3,481,227 shares and 3,436,227 shares issued; 3,316,658 and 3,271,658 shares outstanding

  2,176   2,148 

Surplus

  13,747   12,787   14,819   13,747 

Retained earnings

  65,618   60,735   70,928   65,618 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

  (3,412)  4,456 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  907   (3,412)

Treasury stock, at cost; 164,569 shares

  (2,476)  (2,476)  (2,476)  (2,476)

Total shareholders' equity

  75,625   77,623   86,354   75,625 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $932,883  $919,874  $977,135  $932,883 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

 
- 45 -

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Interest Income

                

Interest and fees on loans

 $22,245  $24,311  $22,759  $22,245 

Interest and dividends on investment securities:

                

Taxable

  5,611   6,183   5,406   5,611 

Tax-exempt

  2,682   2,816   2,223   2,682 

Interest on trading securities

  158   - 

Interest on interest-bearing balances and other interest income

  46   38   124   46 

Total interest income

  30,584   33,348   30,670   30,584 

Interest Expense

                

Interest on deposits

                

Interest-bearing demand

  649   655   673   649 

Money market

  133   231   126   133 

Savings

  820   1,141   770   820 

Time

  1,882   2,391   1,636   1,882 

Time of $100,000 or more

  1,189   1,454   1,155   1,189 

Interest on short-term borrowings

  111   109   114   111 

Interest on long-term debt

  249   467   70   249 

Total interest expense

  5,033   6,448   4,544   5,033 

Net interest income

  25,551   26,900   26,126   25,551 

Provision for loan losses

  400   900   400   400 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  25,151   26,000   25,726   25,151 

Non-Interest Income

                

Total other-than-temporary impairment loss on investment securities

  (43)  (105)  -   (43)

Less: Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)

  -   -   -   - 

Net other-than temporary impairment losses on investment securities

  (43)  (105)  -   (43)

Net gain on sale of investment securities

  867   682   1,112   867 

Net gain on investment securities

  824   577   1,112   824 

Net gain on trading activities

  156   - 

Fees for services to customers

  1,594   1,476   1,687   1,594 

ATM and debit card

  1,499   1,467   1,485   1,499 

Retail brokerage and advisory

  523   39   657   523 

Bank-owned life insurance

  320   333   472   320 

Merchant

  367   373   299   367 

Net gain on sale of loans

  425   885   258   425 

Gain on sale of internet domain name

  1,000   - 

Other

  261   259   416   261 

Total non-interest income

  5,813   5,409   7,542   5,813 

Non-Interest Expense

                

Salaries and employee benefits

  10,553   10,403   11,649   10,553 

Net occupancy

  1,638   1,630   1,705   1,638 

Furniture and equipment

  1,714   1,503   1,753   1,714 

Marketing

  971   829   841   971 

Third party services

  1,488   1,508   1,677   1,488 

Telephone, postage and supplies

  670   614   730   670 

State taxes

  690   647   617   690 

FDIC insurance premiums

  705   695   686   705 

Other

  1,797   1,796   1,968   1,797 

Total non-interest expense

  20,226   19,625   21,626   20,226 

Income before income taxes

  10,738   11,784   11,642   10,738 

Provision for income taxes

  2,346   2,609   2,644   2,346 

Net Income

 $8,392  $9,175  $8,998  $8,392 

Earnings Per Share - Basic

 $2.58  $2.87  $2.73  $2.58 

Earnings Per Share - Diluted

 $2.57  $2.86  $2.72  $2.57 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

 
- 46 -

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

(in thousands)

  

(in thousands)

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 
 

Before

tax

amount

  

Tax

expense

(benefit)

  

Net of

tax

amount

  

Before

tax

amount

  

Tax

expense

(benefit)

  

Net of

tax

amount

  

Before

tax

amount

  

Tax

expense

(benefit)

  

Net of

tax

amount

  

Before

tax

amount

  

Tax

expense

(benefit)

  

Net of

tax

amount

 

Net income

 $10,738  $2,346  $8,392  $11,784  $2,609  $9,175  $11,642  $2,644  $8,998  $10,738  $2,346  $8,392 

Other comprehensive income:

                                                

Net unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities:

                        

Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period

  (11,098)  (3,774)  (7,324)  261   89   172 

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities:

                        

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period

  7,657   2,604   5,053   (11,098)  (3,774)  (7,324)

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

  (824)  (280)  (544)  (577)  (196)  (381)  (1,112)  (378)  (734)  (824)  (280)  (544)

Other comprehensive (loss) income

  (11,922)  (4,054)  (7,868)  (316)  (107)  (209)

Total comprehensive (loss) income

 $(1,184) $(1,708) $524  $11,468  $2,502  $8,966 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  6,545   2,226   4,319   (11,922)  (4,054)  (7,868)

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 $18,187  $4,870  $13,317  $(1,184) $(1,708) $524 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statementsstatements.

 

 
- 47 -

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

                            
                 

Accumulated

                          

Accumulated

         
 

Number of

              

Other

          

Number of

              

other

         
 

Shares

  

Common

      

Retained

  

Comprehensive

  

Treasury

      

shares

  

Common

      

Retained

  

comprehensive

  

Treasury

     

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

Outstanding

  

Stock

  

Surplus

  

Earnings

  

Income (Loss)

  

Stock

  

Total

  

outstanding

  

stock

  

Surplus

  

earnings

  

income (loss)

  

stock

  

Total

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

  3,174,245  $2,087  $11,679  $54,886  $4,665  $(2,476) $70,841 

Net income

  -   -   -   9,175   -   -   9,175 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  -   -   -   -   (209)  -   (209)

Cash dividends declared ($1.04 per share)

  -   -   -   (3,326)  -   -   (3,326)

Stock issued in connection with dividendreinvestment and stock purchase plan

  39,986   25   887   -   -   -   912 

Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan

  4,044   3   79   -   -   -   82 

Stock issued for options exercised

  9,728   6   47   -   -   -   53 

Tax benefit of stock options exercised

  -   -   19   -   -   -   19 

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   76   -   -   -   76 

Balance, December 31, 2012

  3,228,003  $2,121  $12,787  $60,735  $4,456  $(2,476) $77,623   3,228,003  $2,121  $12,787  $60,735  $4,456  $(2,476) $77,623 

Net income

  -   -   -   8,392   -   -   8,392   -   -   -   8,392   -   -   8,392 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  -   -   -   -   (7,868)  -   (7,868)  -   -   -   -   (7,868)  -   (7,868)

Cash dividends declared ($1.08 per share)

  -   -   -   (3,509)  -   -   (3,509)  -   -   -   (3,509)  -   -   (3,509)

Stock issued in connection with dividendreinvestment and stock purchase plan

  35,481   22   801   -   -   -   823 

Stock issued in connection with dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan

  35,481   22   801   -   -   -   823 

Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan

  3,692   2   77   -   -   -   79   3,692   2   77   -   -   -   79 

Stock issued for options exercised

  4,482   3   9   -   -   -   12   4,482   3   9   -   -   -   12 

Tax benefit of stock options exercised

  -   -   2   -   -   -   2   -   -   2   -   -   -   2 

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   71   -   -   -   71   -   -   71   -   -   -   71 

Balance, December 31, 2013

  3,271,658  $2,148  $13,747  $65,618  $(3,412) $(2,476) $75,625   3,271,658  $2,148  $13,747  $65,618  $(3,412) $(2,476) $75,625 

Net income

  -   -   -   8,998   -   -   8,998 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

  -   -   -   -   4,319   -   4,319 

Cash dividends declared ($1.12 per share)

  -   -   -   (3,688)  -   -   (3,688)

Stock issued in connection with dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan

  29,288   18   731   -   -   -   749 

Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan

  3,239   2   72   -   -   -   74 

Stock issued for options exercised

  12,473   8   157   -   -   -   165 

Tax benefit of stock options exercised

  -   -   29   -   -   -   29 

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   83   -   -   -   83 

Balance, December 31, 2014

  3,316,658  $2,176  $14,819  $70,928  $907  $(2,476) $86,354 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

 
- 48 -

 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

(in thousands)

  

(in thousands)

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Operating Activities

                

Net income

 $8,392  $9,175  $8,998  $8,392 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

                

Depreciation and amortization

  1,146   1,010   1,167   1,146 

Provision for loan losses

  400   900   400   400 

Net gains on investment securities available-for-sale

  (824)  (577)  (1,112)  (824)

Net loss on sale of repossessed assets, other real estate owned and premises and equipment

  179   9   2   179 

Net gain on sale of loans

  (425)  (885)  (258)  (425)

Gain on sale of internet domain name

  (1,000)  - 

Proceeds from sales of residential mortgages held-for-sale

  17,022   21,039   6,589   17,022 

Origination of residential mortgages held-for-sale

  (14,981)  (20,835)  (6,711)  (14,981)

Income on bank-owned life insurance

  (320)  (333)  (472)  (320)

Stock-based compensation expense

  71   76   83   71 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

  212   (409)

Net increase in income taxes payable

  35   16 

Net increase in trading securities

  (4,207)  - 

Deferred income tax expense

  368   212 

Net (decrease) increase in income taxes payable

  (65)  35 

Net decrease in accrued interest receivable

  224   187   11   224 

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights and change in valuation allowance

  55   195   62   55 

Net amortization of premiums and discounts on investment securities

  2,265   2,122   2,148   2,265 

Net decrease in accrued interest payable

  (95)  (302)  (48)  (95)

Decrease (increase) in other assets

  4,140   (3,370)

(Decrease) increase in other liabilities

  (173)  209 

(Increase) decrease in other assets

  (100)  4,140 

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

  122   (173)

Net cash provided by operating activities

  17,323   8,227   5,977   17,323 

Investing Activities

                

Proceeds from payments, maturities and calls of investment securities

        

available-for-sale

  110,123   135,580 

held-to-maturity

  -   1,181 

Proceeds from the sale of investment securities

        

available-for-sale

  19,559   44,600 

Purchases of investment securities

        

available-for-sale

  (130,213)  (235,452)

Proceeds from payments, maturities and calls of investment securities available-for-sale

  82,360   110,123 

Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale

  29,972   19,559 

Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale

  (92,017)  (130,213)

Proceeds from redemption of investment in restricted bank stock

  656   139   3,673   656 

Purchase of restricted bank stock

  (176)  (608)  (2,556)  (176)

Net (increase) decrease in loans

  (28,751)  10,971 

Net increase in loans

  (55,263)  (28,751)

Net purchases of premises and equipment

  (2,048)  (2,374)  (995)  (2,048)

Proceeds from sale of internet domain name

  1,000   - 

Redemption of bank-owned life insurance

  234   - 

Proceeds from sales of repossessed assets

  1,678   513   152   1,678 

Net cash used by investing activities

  (29,172)  (45,450)  (33,440)  (29,172)

Financing Activities

                

Net increase in non-interest bearing deposits

  2,302   6,835   10,933   2,302 

Net increase in interest-bearing deposits

  10,592   44,091   26,127   10,592 

Net increase in short-term borrowings

  2,668   8,467   33   2,668 

Repayments of long-term debt

  (287)  (15,012)  (5,000)  (287)

Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

  2   19   29   2 

Cash dividends paid, net of reinvestment

  (3,130)  (2,997)  (3,328)  (3,130)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  535   718   628   535 

Net cash provided by financing activities

  12,682   42,121   29,422   12,682 

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

  833   4,898   1,959   833 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  15,453   10,555   16,286   15,453 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $16,286  $15,453  $18,245  $16,286 

Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

                

Interest paid

 $5,128  $6,750  $4,592  $5,128 

Income taxes paid

  2,095   2,980   2,310   2,095 

Non-cash transactions

                

Transfer of loans to repossessed assets or other real estate owned

  3,521   863   373   3,521 

Unsettled trades to purchase securities

  1,355   - 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

 
- 49 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


 

Business


QNB Corp. (the “Company”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary, QNB Bank (the “Bank”), has been serving the residents and businesses of Bucks, Lehigh, and Montgomery counties in Pennsylvania since 1877. The Bank is a locally managed community bank that provides a full range of commercial, retail banking and retail brokerage services. The Bank encounters vigorous competition for market share in the communities it serves from bank holding companies, other community banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and other non-bank financial organizations such as mutual fund companies, insurance companies and brokerage companies. The Company manages its business as a single operating segment.

 

The Bank is a Pennsylvania chartered commercial bank. The Company and the Bank are subject to regulations of certain state and Federal agencies. These regulatory agencies periodically examine the Company and the Bank for adherence to laws and regulations.

 

Basis of Presentation


The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank. The consolidated entity is referred to herein as “QNB”. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

 

For comparative purposes, prior year’s consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the report classifications of the current year. The reclassifications had no effect on net income.

 

Tabular information, other than share and per share data, is presented in thousands of dollars.

 

Use of Estimates


These statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and predominant practices within the banking industry. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires QNB to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. QNB evaluates estimates on an on-going basis. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the determination of the valuation of other real estate owned, the fair value of financial instruments, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities, the determination of impairment of restricted bank stock and the valuation of deferred tax assets and income taxes. QNB bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

Significant Group Concentrations of Credit Risk


Most of the Company’s activities are with customers located within Bucks, Montgomery and Lehigh Counties in southeastern Pennsylvania. Note 4 discusses the types of investment securities in which the Company invests. Note 5 discusses the types of lending in which the Company engages. The Company does not have any significant concentrations to any one industry or customer. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is influenced by the region’s economy.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents


For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in the Federal Reserve Bank and other banks and Federal funds sold. QNB maintains a portion of its interest-bearing deposits at various commercial financial institutions. At times, the balances exceed the FDIC insured limits.

 

InvestmentTrading Securities


Investment securities that QNB has the positive intentThe Company engages in trading activities for its own account. Interest and ability to hold to maturitydividends are classified as held-to-maturity securities and reported at amortized cost.included in interest income. Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling in the near term are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. In 2014, QNB sold approximately $5,000,000 in available-for-sale municipal securities and established a trading account with a broker with a balance of $4,207,000 at December 31, 2014, consisting of municipal securities and a brokerage cash account of $1,160,000. QNB had no trading securities at December 31, 2013.

Investment Securities


Investment securities that QNB has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and reported at amortized cost. Interest and dividends are included in interest income. Debt and equity securities not classified as either held-to-maturity securities or trading securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income or loss, a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase. QNB had no trading securities at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

- 50 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


Investment Securities (continued)


Available-for-sale securities include securities that management intends to use as part of its asset/liability management strategy and that may be sold in response to changes in credit ratings, changes in market interest rates and related changes in the securities’ prepayment risk or to meet liquidity needs.

 

- 50 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


Investment Securities (continued)


Premiums and discounts on debt securities are recognized in interest income using a constant yield method. Gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities are recorded on the trade date and are computed on the specific identification method and included in non-interest income.

 

Other-than-Temporary Impairment of Investment Securities


Securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reasons underlying the decline, to determine whether the loss in value is other-than-temporary. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value is not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support realizable value equal to or greater than carrying value of the investment. For equity securities, once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of the equity security is reduced to fair value and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized.

 

The Company follows the accounting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320-10 as it relates to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). This accounting guidance specifies that (a) if a company does not have the intent to sell a debt security prior to recovery and (b) it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery, the security would not be considered other-than-temporarily impaired unless there is a credit loss. When an entity does not intend to sell the security, and it is more likely than not, the entity will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it will recognize the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. For held to maturity debt securities, the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income for the non-credit portion of a previous other-than-temporary impairment would be amortized prospectively over the remaining life of the security on the basis of the timing of future estimated cash flows of the security.

 

Restricted Investment in Bank Stock


Restricted bank stock is comprised of restricted stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) in the amount of $1,752,000$635,000 and the Atlantic CentralCommunity Bankers Bank in the amount of $12,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB to hold stock of its district bank according to a predetermined formula. These restricted securities are carried at cost.

 

Loans


Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs. Interest income is accrued on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination and commitment fees and related direct costs are deferred and amortized to income over the term of the respective loan and loan commitment period as a yield adjustment.

 

Loans held-for-sale consist of residential mortgage loans and are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance charged to income. Gains and losses on residential mortgages held-for-sale are included in non-interest income.

 

Non-Performing Assets


Non-performing assets are comprised of accruing loans past due 90 days or more, non-accrual loans and investment securities, restructured loans, other real estate owned and repossessed assets. Non-accrual loans and investment securities are those on which the accrual of interest has ceased. Loans and indirect lease financing loans are placed on non-accrual status immediately if, in the opinion of management, collection is doubtful, or when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more and collateral is insufficient to cover principal and interest. Interest accrued, but not collected at the date a loan is placed on non-accrual status, is reversed and charged against interest income. Subsequent cash receipts are applied either to the outstanding principal or recorded as interest income, depending on management’s assessment of the ultimate collectability of principal and interest. Loans are returned to an accrual status when the borrower’s ability to make periodic principal and interest payments has returned to normal (i.e. brought current with respect to principal or interest or restructured) and the paying capacity of the borrower and/or the underlying collateral is deemed sufficient to cover principal and interest.

 

From time to time, QNB may extend, restructure, or otherwise modify the terms of existing loans, on a case-by-case basis, to remain competitive and retain certain customers, as well as assist other customers that maybemay be experiencing financial difficulties. A loan is considered to be a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) loan when the Company grants a concession to the borrower because of the borrower’s financial condition that it would not otherwise consider. Such concessions include the reduction of interest rates, forgiveness ofprincipal or interest, or other modifications of interest rates to less than the current market rate for new obligations with similar risk. Loans classified as TDRs are considered non-performing and are also designated as impaired.

 

 
- 51 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


 

Non-Performing Assets (continued)


Accounting for impairment in the performance of a loan is required when it is probable that all amounts, including both principal and interest, will not be collected in accordance with the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loans are collateral dependent. Impairment criteria are applied to the loan portfolio exclusive of smaller homogeneous loans such as residential mortgage and consumer loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment.

 

Loans are fully charged-off or charged down to net realizable value (fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell) when deemed uncollectible due to bankruptcy or other factors, or when they reach a defined number of days past due based on loan product, industry practice, terms and other factors.

 

Loans are considered past due when contractually required principal or interest payments have not been made on the due dates.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses


QNB maintains an allowance for loan losses, which is intended to absorb probable known and inherent losses in the outstanding loan portfolio. The allowance is reduced by actual credit losses and is increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries of previous losses. The provisions for loan losses are charged to earnings to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level considered necessary by management.

 

The allowance for loan losses is based on management’s continuing review and evaluation of the loan portfolio. The level of the allowance is determined by assigning specific reserves to individually identified problem credits and general reserves to all other loans. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The portion of the allowance that is allocated to internally criticized and non-accrual loans is determined by estimating the inherent loss on each credit after giving consideration to the value of underlying collateral. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class including commercial loans not considered impaired, as well as smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate, home equity and other consumer loans. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates. These loss rates are based on a three year history of charge-offs and are more heavily weighted for recent experience for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These qualitative risk factors include:

 

Lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and collection, charge-off and recovery practices.

External factor effects, such as legal and regulatory requirements.

National, regional, and local economic and business conditions as well as the condition of various market segments, including the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans.

Nature and volume of the portfolio including growth.

Experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff.

Volume and severity of past due, classified and nonaccrual loans.

Quality of the Company’s loan review system, and the degree of oversight by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations.

 

Each factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on management’s best judgment using relevant information available at the time of the evaluation.

 

An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

 

Management emphasizes loan quality and close monitoring of potential problem credits. Credit risk identification and review processes are utilized in order to assess and monitor the degree of risk in the loan portfolio. QNB’s lending and credit administration staff are charged with reviewing the loan portfolio and identifying changes in the economy or in a borrower’s circumstances which may affect the ability to repay debt or the value of pledged collateral. A loan classification and review system exists that identifies those loans with a higher than normal risk of collection. Each commercial loan is assigned a grade based upon an assessment of the borrower’s financial capacity to service the debt and the presence and value of collateral for the loan. An independent loan review group tests risk assessments and evaluates the adequacy ofthe allowance for loan losses. Management meets monthly to review the credit quality of the loan portfolio and quarterly to review the allowance for loan losses.

 

- 52 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review QNB’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require QNB to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments using information available to them at the time of their examination.

 

- 52 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


Management believes that it uses the best information available to make determinations about the adequacy of the allowance and that it has established its existing allowance for loan losses in accordance with GAAP. If circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making determinations, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be affected. Because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that increases to the allowance will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above.

 

Transfers of Financial Assets


Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

 

Servicing Assets


Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through the sale of financial assets. When mortgage loans are sold, a portion of the cost of originating the loan is allocated to the servicing rights based on relative fair value. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The Company subsequently measures servicing rights using the amortization method where servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income. On a quarterly basis an independent third party determines the fair value of QNB’s servicing assets. These assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into tranches based on predominant characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type and investor type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual tranche, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the tranches. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, a reduction of the valuation allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. Capitalized servicing rights are reported in other assets and are amortized into other noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets.

 

Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal, or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. The amortization of mortgage servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income.

 

Foreclosed Assets


Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net expenses from foreclosed assets. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the Company had foreclosed assets of $2,825,000$3,025,000 and $1,161,000,$2,825,000, respectively. These amounts are included in other assets on the balance sheet.

 

Premises and Equipment


Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated principally on an accelerated or straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or the shorter of the estimated useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements, as follows:

Buildings

Buildings                               10 to 40 years

Furniture and Equipment     3 to 10 years

Furniture and Equipment 3 to 10 years

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Gains or losses upon disposition are reflected in earnings as realized.

 

Bank-Owned Life Insurance


The Bank invests in bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) as a source of funding for employee benefit expenses. BOLI involves the purchasing of life insurance by the Bank on a select group of employees. The Bank is the owner and beneficiary of the policies. Income from the increase in cash surrender value of the policies as well as the receipt of death benefits is included in non-interest income on the income statement.

 

- 53 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


Bank-Owned Life Insurance (continued)


The Company follows the accounting guidance for postretirement benefit aspects of endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements which applies to life insurance arrangements that provide an employee with a specified benefit that is not limited to the employee’s active service period, including certain bank-owned life insurance policies. It requires an employer to recognize a liability and related compensation costs for future benefits that extend to postretirement periods. The expense recorded during both2014 and 2013 and 2012 was approximately $21,000 and $19,000, respectively, and is included in non-interest expense under salaries and benefits expense.

 

- 53 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


Stock-Based Compensation


At December 31, 2013,2014, QNB sponsored stock-based compensation plans, administered by a Board committee, under which both qualified and non-qualified stock options may be granted periodically to certain employees. QNB accounts for all awards granted under stock-based compensation plans in accordance with FASB ASC 718,Compensation - Stock Compensation. Compensation cost has been measured using the fair value of an award on the grant date and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period.

 

Stock-based compensation expense was approximately $71,000$83,000 and $76,000$71,000 for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. There was no tax benefit recognized related to this compensation for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.

 

The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis between the grant date for the option and each vesting date. QNB estimated the fair value of stock options on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The model requires the use of numerous assumptions, many of which are highly subjective in nature. The following assumptions were used in the option pricing model in determining the fair value of options granted during the periods presented.

      

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Risk free interest rate

  0.35%  0.39%  0.69%  0.35%

Dividend yield

  4.26   4.68   4.28   4.26 

Volatility

  34.1   33.8   28.1   34.1 

Expected life (years)

  5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0 

 

The weighted average fair value per share of options granted during 2014 and 2013 was $3.81 and 2012 was $4.52, and $3.81, respectively. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to the expected life of the option being valued. Historical information was the primary basis for the selection of the expected dividend yield, expected volatility and expected lives of the options.

 

Income Taxes


QNB accounts for income taxes under the asset/liability method in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (ASC 740 -Income Taxes). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets when, in the judgment of management, it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not become available. Because the judgment about the level of future taxable income is dependent to a great extent on matters that may, at least in part, be beyond QNB’s control, it is at least reasonably possible that management’s judgment about the need for a valuation allowance for deferred taxes could change in the near term.

 

In connection with the accounting guidance related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which sets out a consistent framework to determine the appropriate level of tax reserves to maintain for uncertain tax positions, QNB has evaluated its tax positions as of December 31, 2013.2014. A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that has more than a 50 percent likelihood of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. Under the “more-likely-than-not” threshold guidelines, QNB believes no significant uncertain tax positions exist, either individually or in the aggregate, that would give rise to the non-recognition of an existing tax benefit. As of December 31, 2013,2014, QNB had no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties. QNB’s policy is to account for interest as a component of interest expense and penalties as a component of other expense. The Company and its subsidiary are subject to U.S. Federal income tax as well as income tax of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. QNB is no longer subject to examination by U.S. Federal or State taxing authorities for years before 2010.2011.

 

Treasury Stock


Common stock shares repurchased are recorded as treasury stock at cost.

- 54 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


 

Earnings Per Share


Basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive effects of options and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock method.

 

Treasury shares are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations.

 

- 54 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


Comprehensive Income


Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business entity during a period due to transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding those resulting from investments by and distributions to owners. Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. For QNB, the primary component of other comprehensive income is the unrealized holding gains or losses on available-for-sale investment securities and unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities related to factors other than credit on debt securities.

 

Revenue Recognition


The Company recognizes revenue in the consolidated statements of income as it is earned and when collectability is reasonably assured. The primary source of revenue is interest income from interest earning assets, which is recognized on the accrual basis of accounting using the effective interest method. The recognition of revenues from interest earning assets is based upon formulas from underlying loan agreements, securities contracts or other similar contracts. Non-interest income is recognized on the accrual basis of accounting as services are provided or as transactions occur. Non-interest income includes fees from brokerage and advisory service, deposit accounts, merchant services, ATM and debit card fees, mortgage banking activities, and other miscellaneous services and transactions.

Advertising Costs


Advertising costs are recorded in the period they are incurred within operating expenses in non-interest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk


The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments toextend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and contractual obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. The Company reflects its estimate of credit risk for these instruments in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet with the corresponding expense recorded in other operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income.

Subsequent Events


QNB has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of December 31, 20132014 for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.

On March 6, 2014, QNB filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission announcing it is changing its website address to www.qnbbank.com as part of the Company’s ongoing online rebranding efforts. Beginning on or about March 31, 2014, visitors to the Bank’s original site (www.qnb.com) will be redirected to www.qnbbank.com. The redirection period will last until September 30, 2014 at which time the original site (www.qnb.com) will be taken out of service. Then, on December 31, 2014, ownership of the website address (www.qnb.com) will be transferred to Qatar National Bank who has agreed to purchase it from QNB Bank for $1,000,000.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In February 2013,January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-022014-04 –, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): ReportingReclassification of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeResidential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure. The ASU clarifies that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments in this guidance require an entity to report the effectinterim and annual disclosure of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income ifboth (1) the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to be reclassifiedof foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in its entirety to net income.  For other amountsconsumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are not required under U.S. GAAPin the process of foreclosure according to be reclassifiedlocal requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. The objective of this ASU is to promote uniformity in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. Thispractice on this topic. The amendment is effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements but will result in expanded disclosures.

- 55 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)


Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)


In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers(Topic 606). This ASU was issued to help improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets. The ASU’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, this update specifies the accounting for certain costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and expands disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 20122016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is evaluating the effect of adopting this new ASU.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-14,Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40). The amendments in this Update require that a mortgage loan be derecognized and that a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met: (1) the loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure, (2) at the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under that claim, and (3) at the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value of the real estate is fixed. Upon foreclosure, the separate other receivable should be measured based on the amount of the loan balance (principal and interest) expected to be recovered from the guarantor. The provisions in this ASU are effective for public companies.business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The applicationCompany is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of thisthe standard did notwill have a material impact on the Company’sits financial statements, but it did result in additional required disclosures that can be found in Note 16.position or results of operations.

 

 

Note 2 – Earnings Per Share and Share Repurchase Plan


 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

        

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share - net income

 $8,392  $9,175  $8,998  $8,392 

Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares outstanding

  3,248,397   3,197,204   3,291,939   3,248,397 

Effect of dilutive securities - employee stock options

  11,678   12,653   10,635   11,678 

Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding

  3,260,075   3,209,857   3,302,574   3,260,075 

Earnings per share - basic

 $2.58  $2.87  $2.73  $2.58 

Earnings per share - diluted

 $2.57  $2.86  $2.72  $2.57 

 

There were 49,80028,700 and 51,60049,800 stock options that were anti-dilutive as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. These stock options were not included in the above calculation.

 

On January 24, 2008, QNB announced that the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 50,000 shares of its common stock in open market or privately negotiated transactions. On February 9, 2009, the Board of Directors approved increasing the authorization to 100,000 shares. The repurchase authorization does not bear a termination date. There were no shares repurchased during the years ended December 31, 20132014 or 2012.2013. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, 57,883 shares were repurchased under this authorization at an average price of $16.97 and a total cost of $982,000.$982,000 and recorded to Treasury stock.

 

 

Note 3 – Cash and Cash Equivalents


 

Included in cash and cash equivalents are reserves in the form of deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. As of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 QNB was not required to maintain reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

 

Note 4 - Investment Securities


Trading

Starting in 2014, QNB engaged in trading activities for its own account. Municipal securities that are held principally for resale in the near term are recorded in the trading account at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in net gain on trading activities in non-interest income. There were net realized and unrealized gains of $156,000 for 2014. Unrealized gains on trading activity related to trading securities still held at December, 2014 totaled $24,000. Interest and dividends are included in interest income.

 
- 5556 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 4 - Investment Securities (continued)


There were no trading securities held by QNB at December 31, 2013. Trading securities, at fair value, at December 31, 2014 were as follows:

      
   Fair  
December 31, 2014  value  

State and municipal

 $4,207  

 

Available-For-Sale

The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 20132014 and December 31, 20122013 were as follows:

December 31, 2013

                
      

Gross

  

Gross

     
      

unrealized

  

unrealized

     
  

Fair

  

holding

  

holding

  

Amortized

 
  

value

  

gains

  

losses

  

cost

 

U.S. Government agency

 $71,639  $195  $(1,702) $73,146 

State and municipal

  87,199   1,023   (1,627)  87,803 

U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs):

                

Mortgage-backed

  139,723   1,436   (2,361)  140,648 

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  75,394   556   (2,334)  77,172 

Pooled trust preferred

  2,069   85   (1,535)  3,519 

Corporate debt

  6,021   24   (13)  6,010 

Equity

  6,625   1,127   (44)  5,542 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

 $388,670  $4,446  $(9,616) $393,840 

December 31, 2012

                
      

Gross

  

Gross

     
      

unrealized

  

unrealized

     
  

Fair

  

holding

  

holding

  

Amortized

 
  

value

  

gains

  

losses

  

cost

 

U.S. Government agency

 $104,130  $750  $(19) $103,399 

State and municipal

  86,789   3,141   (91)  83,739 

U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs):

                

Mortgage-backed

  107,973   3,169   (33)  104,837 

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  94,091   1,188   (155)  93,058 

Pooled trust preferred

  1,962   51   (1,608)  3,519 

Corporate debt

  2,502   44   -   2,458 

Equity

  4,055   402   (87)  3,740 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

 $401,502  $8,745  $(1,993) $394,750 
                 
      

Gross

  

Gross

     
      

unrealized

  

unrealized

     
  

Fair

  

holding

  

holding

  

Amortized

 

December 31, 2014

 

value

  

gains

  

losses

  

cost

 

U.S. Government agency

 $62,665  $212  $(472) $62,925 

State and municipal

  72,569   1,500   (150)  71,219 

U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs):

                

Mortgage-backed

  136,192   1,819   (466)  134,839 

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  87,662   330   (1,300)  88,632 

Pooled trust preferred

  2,439   160   (1,240)  3,519 

Corporate debt

  6,037   30   -   6,007 

Equity

  7,655   1,022   (70)  6,703 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

 $375,219  $5,073  $(3,698) $373,844 
                 
      

Gross

  

Gross

     
      

unrealized

  

unrealized

     
  

Fair

  

holding

  

holding

  

Amortized

 

December 31, 2013

 

value

  

gains

  

losses

  

cost

 

U.S. Government agency

 $71,639  $195  $(1,702) $73,146 

State and municipal

  87,199   1,023   (1,627)  87,803 

U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs):

                

Mortgage-backed

  139,723   1,436   (2,361)  140,648 

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  75,394   556   (2,334)  77,172 

Pooled trust preferred

  2,069   85   (1,535)  3,519 

Corporate debt

  6,021   24   (13)  6,010 

Equity

  6,625   1,127   (44)  5,542 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

 $388,670  $4,446  $(9,616) $393,840 

 

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale by contractual maturity at December 31, 20132014 are shown in the following table. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities are assigned to categories based on contractual maturity except for mortgage-backed securities and CMOs which are based on the estimated average life of these securities and state and municipal securities which are based on pre-refunded date, if applicable.

      

Amortized

 

December 31, 2013

 

Fair value

  

cost

 

Due in one year or less

 $11,706  $11,524 

Due after one year through five years

  214,304   214,741 

Due after five years through ten years

  118,631   122,503 

Due after ten years

  37,404   39,530 

Equity securities

  6,625   5,542 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

 $388,670  $393,840 

Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale were $19,559,000 and $44,600,000 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

          
      

Amortized

  

December 31, 2014

 

Fair value

  

cost

  

Due in one year or less

 $9,269  $9,170  

Due after one year through five years

  260,683   260,108  

Due after five years through ten years

  73,771   73,496  

Due after ten years

  23,841   24,367  

Equity securities

  7,655   6,703  

Total investment securities available-for-sale

 $375,219  $373,844  

 

 
- 5657 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 4 - Investment Securities (continued)


Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale were $29,972,000 and $19,559,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

The following table presents information related to the Company’s gains and losses on the sales of equity and debt securities, and losses recognized for the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of these investments.

                              

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 
         

Other-than-

              

Other-than-

              

Other-than-

              

Other-than-

     
 

Gross

  

Gross

  

temporary

      

Gross

  

Gross

  

temporary

      

Gross

  

Gross

  

temporary

      

Gross

  

Gross

  

temporary

     
 

realized

  

realized

  

impairment

      

realized

  

realized

  

impairment

      

realized

  

realized

  

impairment

      

realized

  

realized

  

impairment

     
 

gains

  

losses

  

losses

  

Net gains

  

gains

  

losses

  

losses

  

Net gains

  

gains

  

losses

  

losses

  

Net gains

  

gains

  

losses

  

losses

  

Net gains

 

Equity securities

 $672  $-  $(43) $629  $556  $-  $(105) $451  $1,051  $(6) $-  $1,045  $672  $-  $(43) $629 

Debt securities

  196   (1)  -   195   287   (161)  -   126   310   (243)  -   67   196   (1)  -   195 

Total

 $868  $(1) $(43) $824  $843  $(161) $(105) $577  $1,361  $(249) $-  $1,112  $868  $(1) $(43) $824 

 

The tax expense applicable to the net realized gains were $280,000$378,000 and $196,000$280,000 for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.

 

There were no other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized for debt securities still held by QNB for the years ended December 31, 20132014 or 2012.2013.

 

QNB recognizes OTTI for debt securities classified as available-for-sale in accordance with FASB ASC 320,Investments – Debt and Equity Securities, which requires that we assess whether we intend to sell or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit losses. For debt securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired and that we do not intend to sell and will not be required to sell prior to recovery of our amortized cost basis, the amount of the impairment is separated into the amount that is credit related (credit loss component) and the amount due to all other factors. The credit loss component is recognized in earnings and is the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s effective yield. The remaining difference between the security’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is due to factors that are not credit related and, therefore, is not required to be recognized as a loss in the income statement, but is recognized in other comprehensive income. For equity securities, once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of the equity security is reduced to fair value and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized. QNB believes that we will fully collect the carrying value of securities on which we have recorded a non-credit related impairment in other comprehensive income.

 

The following table presents a rollforward of the credit loss component recognized in earnings. The credit loss component of the amortized cost represents the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the security prior to considering credit losses. The beginning balance represents the credit loss component for debt securities for which OTTI occurred prior to the beginning of the year. Credit-impaired debt securities must be presented in two components based upon whether the current period is the first time the debt security was credit-impaired (initial credit impairment) or is not the first time the debt security was credit-impaired (subsequent credit impairments). No credit impairments were recognized in 20132014 or 2012.2013. In November 2014, the Bank sold a pooled trust preferred holding, PreTSL V, which had OTTI recorded in a prior period. The bank recorded a gain on sale of $56,000 for this security, which had a carrying value of $0. The following table presents a summary of the cumulative credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized as components of earnings for debt securities still held by QNB:

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

 

Balance, beginning of year

 $1,271  $1,279 

Reductions: gain on payoff

  -   (8)

Additions:

        

Initial credit impairments

  -   - 

Subsequent credit impairments

  -   - 

Balance, end of year

 $1,271  $1,271 

       

Year ended December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

 

Balance, beginning of year

 $1,271  $1,271 

Reductions: sale, collateralized debt obligation

  (118)  - 

Additions:

        

Initial credit impairments

  -   - 

Subsequent credit impairments

  -   - 

Balance, end of year

 $1,153  $1,271 

 

 
- 5758 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 4 - Investment Securities (continued)


 

Held-To-Maturity

The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 20132014 and December 31, 20122013 were as follows:

      

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 
     

Gross

  

Gross

          

Gross

  

Gross

          

Gross

  

Gross

          

Gross

  

Gross

     
     

unrealized

  

unrealized

          

unrealized

  

unrealized

          

unrealized

  

unrealized

          

unrealized

  

unrealized

     
 

Amortized

  

holding

  

holding

  

Fair

  

Amortized

  

holding

  

holding

  

Fair

  

Amortized

  

holding

  

holding

  

Fair

  

Amortized

  

holding

  

holding

  

Fair

 
 

cost

  

gains

  

losses

  

value

  

cost

  

gains

  

losses

  

value

  

cost

  

gains

  

losses

  

value

  

cost

  

gains

  

losses

  

value

 

State and municipal

 $146  $16   -  $162  $146  $20   -  $166  $146  $10  $-  $156  $146  $16  $-  $162 

 

The amortized cost and fair value of securities held-to-maturity by contractual maturity at December 31, 20132014 are shown in the following table. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

     

Amortized

          

December 31, 2013

 

Fair value

  

cost

 
      Amortized  
December 31, 2014 Fair value   cost  

Due in one year or less

  -   -   -   -  

Due after one year through five years

 $162  $146  $156  $146  

Due after five years through ten years

  -   -   -   -  

Due after ten years

  -   -   -   -  

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

 $162  $146  $156  $146  

 

There were no sales of investment securities classified as held-to-maturity during 20132014 or 2012.2013.

 

At December 31, 20132014 and December 31, 2012,2013, investment securities available-for-sale totaling $207,868,000$206,774,000 and $170,433,000,$207,868,000, respectively, were pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements and deposits of public funds.

 

Securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position are as follows:

                             

December 31, 2013

                            
      

Less than 12 months

  

12 months or longer

  

Total

 
  

No. of

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

 
  

securities

  

value

  

losses

  

value

  

losses

  

value

  

losses

 

U.S. Government agency

  44  $54,563  $(1,548)  2,846  $(154) $57,409  $(1,702)

State and municipal

  87   33,750   (1,379)  4,288   (248)  38,038   (1,627)

Mortgage-backed

  54   75,720   (2,238)  1,884   (123)  77,604   (2,361)

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  45   33,622   (1,413)  18,567   (921)  52,189   (2,334)

Pooled trust preferred

  5   -   -   1,683   (1,535)  1,683   (1,535)

Corporate debt

  2   1,987   (13)  -   -   1,987   (13)

Equity

  3   394   (24)  136   (20)  530   (44)

Total

  240  $200,036  $(6,615) $29,404  $(3,001) $229,440  $(9,616)

                             

December 31, 2014

                            
      

Less than 12 months

  

12 months or longer

  

Total

 
  

No. of

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

 
  

securities

  

value

  

losses

  

value

  

losses

  

value

  

losses

 

U.S. Government agency

  29  $15,466  $(30) $23,941  $(442) $39,407  $(472)

State and municipal

  39   3,452   (31)  11,964   (119)  15,416   (150)

Mortgage-backed

  34   6,521   (15)  38,586   (451)  45,107   (466)

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  51   2,003   (205)  35,687   (1,095)  37,690   (1,300)

Pooled trust preferred

  5   -   -   1,978   (1,240)  1,978   (1,240)

Equity

  7   1,303   (70)  -   -   1,303   (70)

Total

  165  $28,745  $(351) $112,156  $(3,347) $140,901  $(3,698)
                             

December 31, 2013

                            
      

Less than 12 months

  

12 months or longer

  

Total

 
  

No. of

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

 
  

securities

  

value

  

losses

  

value

  

losses

  

value

  

losses

 

U.S. Government agency

  44  $54,563  $(1,548) $2,846  $(154) $57,409  $(1,702)

State and municipal

  87   33,750   (1,379)  4,288   (248)  38,038   (1,627)

Mortgage-backed

  54   75,720   (2,238)  1,884   (123)  77,604   (2,361)

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  45   33,622   (1,413)  18,567   (921)  52,189   (2,334)

Pooled trust preferred

  5   -   -   1,683   (1,535)  1,683   (1,535)

Corporate debt

  2   1,987   (13)  -   -   1,987   (13)

Equity

  3   394   (24)  136   (20)  530   (44)

Total

  240  $200,036  $(6,615) $29,404  $(3,001) $229,440  $(9,616)

 

 
- 5859 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 4 - Investment Securities (continued)


December 31, 2012

                            
      

Less than 12 months

  

12 months or longer

  

Total

 
  

No. of

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

 
  

securities

  

value

  

losses

  

value

  

losses

  

value

  

losses

 

U.S. Government agency

  4  $3,992  $(19)  -  $-  $3,992  $(19)

State and municipal

  15   6,472   (91)  -   -   6,472   (91)

Mortgage-backed

  9   13,439   (33)  -   -   13,439   (33)

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  19   28,396   (155)  -   -   28,396   (155)

Pooled trust preferred

  5   -   -   1,609   (1,608)  1,609   (1,608)

Equity

  7   587   (45)  272   (42)  859   (87)

Total

  59  $52,886  $(343) $1,881  $(1,650) $54,767  $(1,993)

 

Management evaluates debt securities, which are comprised of U.S. Government Agencies, state and municipalities, mortgage-backed securities, CMOs and other issuers, for OTTI and considers the current economic conditions, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, interest rates and the bond rating of each security. The unrealized losses at December 31, 20132014 in U.S. Government securities, state and municipal securities, mortgage-backed securities CMOs, and corporate debt securitiesCMOs are primarily the result of interest rate fluctuations. If held to maturity, these bonds will mature at par, and QNB will not realize a loss. QNB has the intent to hold the securities and does not believe it will be required to sell the securities before recovery occurs.

 

QNB holds sevensix pooled trust preferred securities as of December 31, 2013.2014. These securities have a total amortized cost of $3,519,000 and a fair value of $2,069,000.$2,439,000. Five of the sevensix securities have been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months. All of the pooled trust preferred securities are available-for-sale securities and are carried at fair value.

 

The following table provides additional information related to pooled trust preferred securities (PreTSLs) as of December 31, 2013:2014:

                                                          

Deal

Class

 

Book

value

  

Fair

value

  

Unreal-ized gains (losses)

  

Realized

OTTI

credit

loss

(YTD 2013)

  

Total

recognized

OTTI

credit

loss

 

Moody's

/Fitch

ratings

 

Current

number of

performing

banks

  

Current

number of

performing

insurance

companies

  

Actual deferrals and defaults as a % of total collateral

  

Total performing collateral as a % of outstanding bonds

 

Class

 

Book

value

  

Fair

value

  

Unreal-

ized

gains (losses)

  

 

Realized

OTTI

credit

loss

(YTD

2014)

  

Total

recognized

OTTI

credit

loss

 

Moody's

/Fitch

ratings

 

Current

number of

performing

banks

  

Current

number of

performing

insurance

companies

  

Actual deferrals and

defaults as a

% of total

collateral

  

Total performing collateral as a % of outstanding bonds

 

PreTSL IV

Mezzanine*

 $243  $200  $(43) $-  $(1)

B1/B

  5   -   18.0%  139.7%

Mezzanine*

 $243  $208  $(35) $-  $(1)

B1/B

  5��  -   18.0%  140.2%

PreTSL V

Mezzanine*

  -   -   -   -   (118)

C/D

  -   -   100   12.9 

PreTSL XVII

Mezzanine

  752   432   (320)  -   (222)

C/C

  32   5   32.9   79.1 

Mezzanine

  752   502   (250)  -   (222)

C/C

  34   5   27.3   87.2 

PreTSL XIX

Mezzanine

  988   427   (561)  -   - 

C/C

  36   13   22.6   82.7 

Mezzanine

  988   508   (480)  -   - 

C/C

  38   12   13.3   92.4 

PreTSL XXV

Mezzanine

  766   339   (427)  -   (222)

C/C

  42   6   33   81.1 

Mezzanine

  766   423   (343)  -   (222)

C/C

  48   5   30.7   85.5 

PreTSL XXVI

Mezzanine

  469   285   (184)  -   (270)

C/C

  40   7   30.2   84.0 

Mezzanine

  469   337   (132)  -   (270)

C/C

  43   7   25.9   91.0 

PreTSL XXVI

Mezzanine

  301   386   85   -   (438)

C/C

  40   7   30.2   84.0 

Mezzanine

  301   461   160   -   (438)

C/C

  43   7   25.9   91.0 
  $3,519  $2,069  $(1,450) $-  $(1,271)                   $3,519  $2,439  $(1,080) $-  $(1,153)                 

 

Mezzanine* - only class of bonds still outstanding (represents the senior-most obligation of the trust)

 

On December 10, 2013, Federal Banking Regulators issued final rules regarding implementation of Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act ("the Volcker rule") which stated that “a banking entity may not, as principal, directly or indirectly, acquire or retain any ownership interest in or sponsor a covered fund”. The interpretation of the final rules indicated that a very high percentage of pooled trust preferred securities would be considered "covered funds". The rules also required that banks dispose of their covered funds by July 21, 2015, subject to a regulatory extension of up to five years. This would have triggered accounting requirements to record pooled trust preferred securities to fair value through the income statement. As a result of this regulation there were some trades of pooled trust preferred securities during December of 2013. On January 14, 2014, Regulators released a final interim rule authorizing retention of pooled trust preferred securities backed primarily by bank-issued trust preferred securities which included the PreTSLs held by QNB. Due to the uncertainty invoked between the original release of the Volcker Rule and the final interim rule,During 2014, there was a noticeable increase in trading activity.activity in this market, as sellers disposed of non-exempted trust preferred securities. However, we believe most of these trades occurred under distress and do not represent trades made in an orderly market. Despite the trades that took place as discussed previously, the market for these securities at December 31, 20132014 was not active and markets for similar securities also are not active. The inactivity was evidenced first by a significant widening of the bid-ask spread in the brokered markets in which pooled trust preferred securities trade and then by a significant decrease in the volume of tradesactive, relative to historical levels.levels of trading activity. The new issue market is also inactive and the market values for these securities are depressed relative to historical levels. Lack of liquidity in the market for trust

- 59 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 - Investment Securities (continued)


preferred collateralized debt obligations, credit rating downgrades and market uncertainties related to the financial industry are all factors contributing to the temporary impairment of these securities. Although these securities are classified as available-for-sale, the Company has the intent to hold the securities and does not believe it will be required to sell the securities before recovery occurs. As illustrated in the previous table, these securities are comprised mainly of securities issued by banks, and to a lesser degree, insurance companies. QNB owns the mezzanine tranches of these securities, except for PreTSL IV and V which representrepresents the senior-most obligation of the trust.

 

On a quarterly basis we evaluate our debtmanagement evaluates securities for OTTI, which involves the use of a third-party valuation firm to assist management with the valuation. When evaluating these investments a credit-related portion and a non-credit related portion of OTTI are determined.

 

The credit related portion is recognized in earnings and represents the expected shortfall in future cash flows. The non-credit related portion is recognized in other comprehensive income and represents the difference between the book value and the fair value of the security less any current quarter credit related impairment. For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, no other-than-temporary impairment charges representing credit impairment were recognized on our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. A discounted cash flow analysis provides the best estimate of credit related OTTI for these securities. In addition, a weighting factor was applied to any available trade data when determining the final estimation of fair value. Additional information related to this analysis follows:

- 60 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 - Investment Securities (continued)


 

All of the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations held by QNB are rated lower than AA and are measured for OTTI within the scope of ASC 325 (formerly known as EITF 99-20),Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets, andAmendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20(formerly known as EITF 99-20-1). QNB performs a discounted cash flow analysis on all of its impaired collateralized debt obligation securities to determine if the amortized cost basis of an impaired security will be recovered. In determining whether a credit loss exists, QNB uses its best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security and discounts them at the effective yield implicit in the security at the date of acquisition or the prospective yield for those securities with prior OTTI charges. The discounted cash flow analysis is considered to be the primary evidence when determining whether credit related other-than-temporary impairment exists.

 

Results of a discounted cash flow test are significantly affected by other variables such as the estimate of future cash flows (including prepayments), credit worthiness of the underlying banks and insurance companies and determination of probability and severity of default of the underlying collateral. The following provides additional information for each of these variables:

 

 

Estimate of Future Cash Flows – Cash flows are constructed in an INTEXcalc valuation model. INTEX is a proprietary cash flow model recognized as the industry standard for analyzing all types of structured debt products. It includes each deal’s structural features updated with trustee information, including asset-by-asset detail, as it becomes available. The modeled cash flows are then used to determine if all the scheduled principal and interest payments of the investments will be returned. For purposes of the cash flow analysis, relatively modest rates of prepayment were forecasted (1%). In addition to the base prepayment assumption, due to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank financial legislation additional prepayment analysis was performed. First, trust preferred securities issued by banks with more than $15 billion in total assets at December 31, 2009 were identified. The current credit rating of these institutions was reviewed and it was assumed that any issuer with an investment grade credit rating would prepay their issuance as soon as possible or July 1, 2015 for bank holding company subsidiaries of foreign banking organizations that have relied on Supervision and Regulation Letter SR-01-1. For those institutions rated below investment grade the holding companies’ approximate cost of long-term funding given their rating and marketplace interest rate was estimated. The following assumption was made; any holding company that could refinance for a cost savings of more than 2% will refinance and will do so as soon as possible, or July 1, 2015. Finally, for issuers not impacted by the Tier 1 regulatory capital legislation enacted by the Dodd-Frank Act, the issuers that have shown a recent history of prepayment of both floating rate and fixed rate issues were identified and it was assumed these issuers will prepay as soon as possible.

 

 

Credit Analysis – A quarterly credit evaluation is performed for the companies comprising the collateral across the various pooled trust preferred securities. This credit evaluation considers any available evidence and focuses on capitalization, asset quality, profitability, liquidity, stock price performance, whether the institution has received TARP funding and whether the institution has shown the ability to generate additional capital either internally or externally.

 

 

Probability of Default – A near-term probability of default is determined for each issuer based on its financial condition and is used to calculate the expected impact of future deferrals and defaults on the expected cash flows. Each issuer in the collateral pool is assigned a near-term probability of default based on individual performance and financial characteristics. Various studies suggest that the rate of bank failures between 1934 and 2008 were approximately 0.36%. Thus, in addition to the specific bank default assumptions used for the near term, future defaults on the individual banks in the analysis for 20142015 and beyond the rate used is calculated based on using the above mentioned thirty-six36 basis points and factoring that number based on a comparison of key financial ratios of active individual issuers without a short-term probability of default compared to all FDIC insured banks.

- 60 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 - Investment Securities (continued)


 

 

Severity of Loss – In addition to the probability of default discussed above, a severity of loss (projected recovery) is determined in all cases. In the current analysis, the severity of loss ranges from 0% to 100% depending on the estimated credit worthiness of the individual issuer. Based on information from various published studies, a 95% severity of loss was utilized for defaults projected in 20142015 and thereafter.

 

In addition to the above factors, the evaluation of impairment also includes a stress test analysis which provides an estimate of future risk for each tranche. This stressed breakpoint is then compared to the level of assets with credit concerns in each tranche. This comparison allows management to identify those pools that are at a greater risk for a future adverse change in cash flows so the asset quality in those pools can be monitored more closely for potential deterioration of credit quality.

 

Based upon the analysis performed by management as of December 31, 2013,2014, it is probable that we will collect all contractual principal and interest payments on one of our sevensix pooled trust preferred securities, PreTSL XIX. The expected principal shortfall on the remaining pooled trust preferred securities resulted in credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges in previous years. All of these pooled trust preferred securities held by QNB could be subject to additional writedowns in the future if additional deferrals and defaults occur.

 

- 61 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses


 

Major classes of loans are as follows:

      

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Commercial:

                

Commercial and industrial

 $111,339  $100,063  $118,845  $111,339 

Construction

  15,929   11,061   23,471   15,929 

Secured by commercial real estate

  190,602   192,867   203,534   190,602 

Secured by residential real estate

  47,672   41,003   53,077   47,672 

State and political subdivisions

  33,773   34,256   44,104   33,773 

Loans to depository institutions

  1,250   3,250   -   1,250 

Indirect lease financing

  8,364   9,685   7,685   8,364 

Retail:

                

1-4 family residential mortgages

  29,730   28,733   37,147   29,730 

Home equity loans and lines

  59,977   54,860   63,213   59,977 

Consumer

  3,116   2,012   4,175   3,116 

Total loans

  501,752   477,790   555,251   501,752 

Net unearned fees

  (36)  (57)

Net unearned costs (fees)

  31   (36)

Loans receivable

 $501,716  $477,733  $555,282  $501,716 


Loans secured by commercial real estate include all loans collateralized at least in part by commercial real estate. These loans may not be for the expressed purpose of conducting commercial real estate transactions.

 

Overdrafts are reclassified as loans and are included in consumer loans above and total loans on the balance sheet. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, overdrafts were $138,000$142,000 and $103,000,$138,000, respectively.

 

QNB generally lends in its trade area which is comprised of Quakertown and the surrounding communities. To a large extent, QNB makes loans collateralized at least in part by real estate. Its lending activities could be affected by changes in the general economy, the regional economy, or real estate values. Other than disclosed in the table above, at December 31, 2013,2014, there were no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans.

 

The Company engages in a variety of lending activities, including commercial, residential real estate and consumer transactions. The Company focuses its lending activities on individuals, professionals and small to medium sized businesses. Risks associated with lending activities include economic conditions and changes in interest rates, which can adversely impact both the ability of borrowers to repay their loans and the value of the associated collateral.

- 61 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


 

Commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans and residential real estate loans with a business purpose are generally perceived as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans with a personal purpose and consumer loans. These types of loans involve larger loan balances to a single borrower or groups of related borrowers and are more susceptible to a risk of loss during a downturn in the business cycle. These loans may involve greater risk because the availability of funds to repay these loans depends on the successful operation of the borrower’s business. The assets financed are used within the business for its ongoing operation. Repayment of these kinds of loans generally comes from the cash flow of the business or the ongoing conversions of assets, such as accounts receivable and inventory, to cash. Typical collateral for commercial and industrial loans includes the borrower’s accounts receivable, inventory and machinery and equipment. Commercial real estate and residential real estate loans secured for a business purpose are originated primarily within the eastern Pennsylvania market area at conservative loan-to-value ratios and often backed by the individual guarantees of the borrowers or owners. Repayment of this kind of loan is dependent upon either the ongoing cash flow of the borrowing entity or the resale of or lease of the subject property. Commercial real estate loans may be affected to a greater extent than residential loans by adverse conditions in real estate markets or the economy because commercial real estate borrowers’ ability to repay their loans depends on successful development of their properties, as well as the factors affecting residential real estate borrowers.

 

Loans to state and political subdivisions are tax-exempt or taxable loans to municipalities, school districts and housing and industrial development authorities. These loans can be general obligations of the municipality or school district repaid through their taxing authority, revenue obligations repaid through the income generated by the operations of the authority, such as a water or sewer authority, or loans issued to a housing and industrial development agency, for which a private corporation is responsible for payments on the loans.

 

Loans to depository institutions consist of a loan to a commercial bank in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. This loan is secured by shares of common stock of the borrowing institution.

- 62 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


 

Indirect lease financing receivables represent loans to small businesses that are collateralized by equipment. These loans tend to have higher risk characteristics but generally provide higher rates of return. These loans are originated by a third party and purchased by QNB based on criteria specified by QNB. The criteria include minimum credit scores of the borrower, term of the lease, type and age of equipment financed and geographic area. The geographic area primarily represents states contiguous to Pennsylvania. QNB is not the lessor and does not service these loans.

 

The Company originates fixed-rate and adjustable-rate real estate-residential mortgage loans for personal purposes that are secured by first liens on the underlying 1-4 family residential properties. Credit risk exposure in this area of lending is minimized by the evaluation of the credit worthiness of the borrower, including debt-to-income ratios, credit scores and adherence to underwriting policies that emphasize conservative loan-to-value ratios of generally no more than 80%. Residential mortgage loans granted in excess of the 80% loan-to-value ratio criterion are generally insured by private mortgage insurance.

 

The real estate-home equity portfolio consists of fixed-rate home equity loans and variable-rate home equity lines of credit. Risks associated with loans secured by residential properties are generally lower than commercial loans and include general economic risks, such as the strength of the job market, employment stability and the strength of the housing market. Since most loans are secured by a primary or secondary residence, the borrower’s continued employment is the greatest risk to repayment.

 

The Company offers a variety of loans to individuals for personal and household purposes. Consumer loans are generally considered to have greater risk than first or second mortgages on real estate because they may be unsecured, or, if they are secured, the value of the collateral may be difficult to assess and is more likely to decrease in value than real estate. Credit risk in this portfolio is controlled by conservative underwriting standards that consider debt-to-income levels and the creditworthiness of the borrower and, if secured, collateral values.

 

The Company employs an eight (8) grade risk rating system related to the credit quality of commercial loans, loans to depository institutions, loans to state and political subdivisions and indirect lease financing of which the first four categories are pass categories (credits not adversely rated). The following is a description of the internal risk ratings and the likelihood of loss related to each risk rating.

1 - Excellent - no apparent risk

2 - Good - minimal risk

3 - Acceptable - average risk

4 - Watch List - greater than average risk

5 - Special Mention - potential weaknesses

6 - Substandard - well defined weaknesses

7 - Doubtful - full collection unlikely

8 - Loss - considered uncollectible

 

- 62 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


The Company maintains a loan review system, which allows for a periodic review of our loan portfolio and the early identification of potential problem loans. Each loan officer assigns a rating to allcommercial loans, in the portfolioloans to depository institutions, loans to state and political subdivisions and indirect lease financing at the time the loan is originated. Loans with risk ratings of one through three are reviewed annually based on the borrower’s fiscal year. Loans with risk ratings of four are reviewed every six to twelve months based on the dollar amount of the relationship with the borrower. Loans with risk ratings of five through eight are reviewed at least quarterly, and as often as monthly, at management’s discretion. The Company also utilizes an outside loan review firm to review the portfolio on a semi-annual basis to provide the Board of Directors and senior management an independent review of the Bank’s loan portfolio on an ongoing basis. These reviews are designed to recognize deteriorating credits in their earliest stages in an effort to reduce and control risk in the lending function as well as identifying potential shifts in the quality of the loan portfolio. The examinations by the outside loan review firm include the review of lending activities with respect to underwriting and processing new loans, monitoring the risk of existing loans and to provide timely follow-up and corrective action for loans showing signs of deterioration in quality. In addition, the outside firm reviews the methodology for the allowance for loan losses to determine compliance to policy and regulatory guidance.

 

- 63 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within the Company’s internal risk rating system as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012:2013:

December 31, 2013

 

Pass

  

Special

mention

  

Substandard

  

Doubtful

  

Total

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $100,943  $59  $10,337  $-  $111,339 

Construction

  13,751   827   1,351   -   15,929 

Secured by commercial real estate

  163,349   4,199   23,054   -   190,602 

Secured by residential real estate

  43,854   187   3,631   -   47,672 

State and political subdivisions

  33,488   -   285   -   33,773 

Loans to depository institutions

  1,250   -   -   -   1,250 

Indirect lease financing

  8,199   -   165   -   8,364 
  $364,834  $5,272  $38,823  $-  $408,929 

December 31, 2012

 

Pass

  

Special

mention

  

Substandard

  

Doubtful

  

Total

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $88,427  $3,843  $7,763  $30  $100,063 

Construction

  5,558   1,513   3,990   -   11,061 

Secured by commercial real estate

  157,678   7,493   27,696   -   192,867 

Secured by residential real estate

  36,078   1,199   3,726   -   41,003 

State and political subdivisions

  32,303   -   1,953   -   34,256 

Loans to depository institutions

  3,250   -   -   -   3,250 

Indirect lease financing

  9,329   -   356   -   9,685 
  $332,623  $14,048  $45,484  $30  $392,185 
                

December 31, 2014

 

Pass

  

Special mention

  

Substandard

  

Doubtful

  

Total

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $111,560  $42  $7,243  $-  $118,845 

Construction

  22,981   128   362   -   23,471 

Secured by commercial real estate

  178,339   2,418   22,777   -   203,534 

Secured by residential real estate

  50,172   408   2,497   -   53,077 

State and political subdivisions

  42,771   -   1,333   -   44,104 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  7,543   -   142   -   7,685 
  $413,366  $2,996  $34,354  $-  $450,716 
                     

December 31, 2013

 

Pass

  

Special mention

  

Substandard

  

Doubtful

  

Total

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $100,943  $59  $10,337  $-  $111,339 

Construction

  13,751   827   1,351   -   15,929 

Secured by commercial real estate

  163,349   4,199   23,054   -   190,602 

Secured by residential real estate

  43,854   187   3,631   -   47,672 

State and political subdivisions

  33,488   -   285   -   33,773 

Loans to depository institutions

  1,250   -   -   -   1,250 

Indirect lease financing

  8,199   -   165   -   8,364 
  $364,834  $5,272  $38,823  $-  $408,929 

 

For retail loans, the Company evaluates credit quality based on the performance of the individual credits. The following tables present the recorded investment in the retail classes of the loan portfolio based on payment activity as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012:2013:

          

December 31, 2014

 

Performing

  

Non-performing

  

Total

 

Retail:

            

1-4 family residential mortgages

 $36,922  $225  $37,147 

Home equity loans and lines

  63,109   104   63,213 

Consumer

  4,174   1   4,175 
  $104,205  $330  $104,535 
             

December 31, 2013

 

Performing

  

Non-performing

  

Total

 

Retail:

            

1-4 family residential mortgages

 $29,329  $401  $29,730 

Home equity loans and lines

  59,712   265   59,977 

Consumer

  3,099   17   3,116 
  $92,140  $683  $92,823 

 

 
- 6364 -

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


 

December 31, 2012

 

Performing

  

Non-performing

  

Total

 

Retail:

            

1-4 family residential mortgages

 $28,398  $335  $28,733 

Home equity loans and lines

  54,514   346   54,860 

Consumer

  2,012   -   2,012 
  $84,924  $681  $85,605 

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio (excluding deferred fees and costs) summarized by the past due status, regardless of whether the loan is on non-accrual status, as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012:2013:

December 31, 2013

 

30-59 days

past due

  

60-89 days

past due

  

90 days or more 

past due

  

Total past

due loans

  

Current

  

Total loans

receivable

 

Commercial:

                        

Commercial and industrial

 $112   -  $17  $129  $111,210  $111,339 

Construction

  -   -   -   -   15,929   15,929 

Secured by commercial real estate

  1,126  $361   255   1,742   188,860   190,602 

Secured by residential real estate

  1,242   98   105   1,445   46,227   47,672 

State and political subdivisions

  65   65   -   130   33,643   33,773 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   1,250   1,250 

Indirect lease financing

  311   152   -   463   7,901   8,364 

Retail:

                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  752   5   270   1,027   28,703   29,730 

Home equity loans and lines

  295   2   106   403   59,574   59,977 

Consumer

  25   5   17   47   3,069   3,116 
  $3,928  $688  $770  $5,386  $496,366  $501,752 

December 31, 2012

 

30-59 days

past due

  

60-89 days

past due

  

90 days or more 

past due

  

Total past

due loans

  

Current

  

Total loans

receivable

 

Commercial:

                        

Commercial and industrial

 $76   -   -  $76  $99,987  $100,063 

Construction

  -   -   -   -   11,061   11,061 

Secured by commercial real estate

  407  $1,460  $3,097   4,964   187,903   192,867 

Secured by residential real estate

  44   523   293   860   40,143   41,003 

State and political subdivisions

  71   1   -   72   34,184   34,256 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   3,250   3,250 

Indirect lease financing

  344   80   35   459   9,226   9,685 

Retail:

                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  -   197   -   197   28,536   28,733 

Home equity loans and lines

  152   153   197   502   54,358   54,860 

Consumer

  33   11   -   44   1,968   2,012 
  $1,127  $2,425  $3,622  $7,174  $470,616  $477,790 
                   

December 31, 2014

 

30-59 days

past due

  

60-89 days

past due

  

90 days or

more past

due

  

Total past

due loans

  

Current

  

Total loans

receivable

 

Commercial:

                        

Commercial and industrial

  -   -   -   -  $118,845  $118,845 

Construction

 $466   -   -  $466   23,005   23,471 

Secured by commercial real estate

  28  $332  $3,747   4,107   199,427   203,534 

Secured by residential real estate

  600   574   -   1,174   51,903   53,077 

State and political subdivisions

  -   -   -   -   44,104   44,104 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  291   -   -   291   7,394   7,685 

Retail:

                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  526   -   -   526   36,621   37,147 

Home equity loans and lines

  66   49   -   115   63,098   63,213 

Consumer

  16   8   -   24   4,151   4,175 
  $1,993  $963  $3,747  $6,703  $548,548  $555,251 
                         

December 31, 2013

 

30-59 days

past due

  

60-89 days past due

 

  

90 days or

more past

due

  

Total past

due loans

  

Current

  

Total loans

receivable

 

Commercial:

                        

Commercial and industrial

 $112   -  $17  $129  $111,210  $111,339 

Construction

  -   -   -   -   15,929   15,929 

Secured by commercial real estate

  1,126  $361   255   1,742   188,860   190,602 

Secured by residential real estate

  1,242   98   105   1,445   46,227   47,672 

State and political subdivisions

  65   65   -   130   33,643   33,773 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   1,250   1,250 

Indirect lease financing

  311   152   -   463   7,901   8,364 

Retail:

                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  752   5   270   1,027   28,703   29,730 

Home equity loans and lines

  295   2   106   403   59,574   59,977 

Consumer

  25   5   17   47   3,069   3,116 
  $3,928  $688  $770  $5,386  $496,366  $501,752 

 

 
- 6465 -

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


 

The following tables disclose the recorded investment in loans receivable that are either on non-accrual status or past due more than 90 days or more and still accruing interest as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012: 2013:

December 31, 2013

 

90 days or more 

pastdue (still

accruing)

  

Non-accrual

 

Commercial:

        

Commercial and industrial

  -  $3,956 

Construction

  -   1,319 

Secured by commercial real estate

  -   4,630 

Secured by residential real estate

  -   2,829 

State and political subdivisions

  -   - 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  -   37 

Retail:

        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  -   401 

Home equity loans and lines

  -   265 

Consumer

 $1   16 
  $1  $13,453 

December 31, 2012

 

90 days or more 

pastdue (still

accruing)

  

Non-accrual

 

Commercial:

        

Commercial and industrial

 $-  $6,174 

Construction

  -   2,480 

Secured by commercial real estate

  -   6,748 

Secured by residential real estate

  -   2,390 

State and political subdivisions

  -   1 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  -   98 

Retail:

        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  -   335 

Home equity loans and lines

  -   346 

Consumer

  -   - 
  $-  $18,572 
       

December 31, 2014

 

 

90 days or

more past due

(still accruing)

  

Non-accrual

 

Commercial:

        

Commercial and industrial

 $-  $2,171 

Construction

  -   337 

Secured by commercial real estate

  -   6,465 

Secured by residential real estate

  -   1,467 

State and political subdivisions

  -   - 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  -   - 

Retail:

        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  -   225 

Home equity loans and lines

  -   104 

Consumer

  -   1 
  $-  $10,770 
         

December 31, 2013

 

 

90 days or

more past due

(still accruing)

  

Non-accrual

 

Commercial:

        

Commercial and industrial

  -  $3,956 

Construction

  -   1,319 

Secured by commercial real estate

  -   4,630 

Secured by residential real estate

  -   2,829 

State and political subdivisions

  -   - 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  -   37 

Retail:

        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  -   401 

Home equity loans and lines

  -   265 

Consumer

 $1   16 
  $1  $13,453 

 

 
- 6566 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


 

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 are as follows:

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

Balance,

beginning of

year

  

Provision for

(credit to) loan

losses

  

Charge-offs

  

Recoveries

  

Balance, end of

year

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $2,505  $(421) $(68) $28  $2,044 

Construction

  209   230   -   -   439 

Secured by commercial real estate

  3,795   (259)  (639)  1   2,898 

Secured by residential real estate

  1,230   743   (401)  60   1,632 

State and political subdivisions

  260   (75)  -   1   186 

Loans to depository institutions

  15   (11)  -   -   4 

Indirect lease financing

  168   (93)  (2)  30   103 

Retail:

                    

1-4 family residential mortgages

  324   (21)  -   -   303 

Home equity loans and lines

  582   207   (234)  28   583 

Consumer

  27   88   (77)  26   64 

Unallocated

  657   12  

N/A

  

N/A

   669 
  $9,772  $400  $(1,421) $174  $8,925 

Year ended December 31, 2012

 

Balance,

beginning of

year

  

Provision for

(credit to) loan

losses

  

Charge-offs

  

Recoveries

  

Balance, end of

year

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $2,959  $(429) $(101) $76  $2,505 

Construction

  556   (347)  -   -   209 

Secured by commercial real estate

  3,124   680   (85)  76   3,795 

Secured by residential real estate

  746   595   (111)  -   1,230 

State and political subdivisions

  195   65   -   -   260 

Loans to depository institutions

  20   (5)  -   -   15 

Indirect lease financing

  312   (95)  (85)  36   168 

Retail:

                    

1-4 family residential mortgages

  249   94   (21)  2   324 

Home equity loans and lines

  625   59   (114)  12   582 

Consumer

  20   61   (64)  10   27 

Unallocated

  435   222  

N/A

  

N/A

   657 
  $9,241  $900  $(581) $212  $9,772 
                

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

Balance,

beginning of

year

  

Provision for

(credit to)

loan losses

  

Charge-offs

  

Recoveries

  

Balance, end of

year

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $2,044  $(202) $(17) $67  $1,892 

Construction

  439   (142)  -   -   297 

Secured by commercial real estate

  2,898   (131)  (70)  3   2,700 

Secured by residential real estate

  1,632   1,019   (1,069)  48   1,630 

State and political subdivisions

  186   35   -   -   221 

Loans to depository institutions

  4   (4)  -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  103   15   (39)  14   93 

Retail:

                    

1-4 family residential mortgages

  303   103   (95)  1   312 

Home equity loans and lines

  583   (84)  (156)  110   453 

Consumer

  64   142   (167)  46   85 

Unallocated

  669   (351) 

N/A

  

N/A

   318 
  $8,925  $400  $(1,613) $289  $8,001 
                     

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

Balance,

beginning of

year

  

Provision for

(credit to)

loan losses

  

Charge-offs

  

Recoveries

  

Balance, end of

year

 

Commercial:

                    

Commercial and industrial

 $2,505  $(421) $(68) $28  $2,044 

Construction

  209   230   -   -   439 

Secured by commercial real estate

  3,795   (259)  (639)  1   2,898 

Secured by residential real estate

  1,230   743   (401)  60   1,632 

State and political subdivisions

  260   (75)  -   1   186 

Loans to depository institutions

  15   (11)  -   -   4 

Indirect lease financing

  168   (93)  (2)  30   103 

Retail:

                    

1-4 family residential mortgages

  324   (21)  -   -   303 

Home equity loans and lines

  582   207   (234)  28   583 

Consumer

  27   88   (77)  26   64 

Unallocated

  657   12  

N/A

  

N/A

   669 
  $9,772  $400  $(1,421) $174  $8,925 

 

As previously discussed, the Company maintains a loan review system, which includes a continuous review of the loan portfolio by internal and external parties to aid in the early identification of potential impaired loans. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial loans, loans to state and political subdivisions and indirect lease financing loans by using either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

 

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential mortgage loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are part of a larger relationship that is impaired, or are classified as a troubled debt restructuring.

 

 
- 6667 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


 

An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of the majority of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.

 

For commercial loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.

 

For commercial loans secured by non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, estimated fair values are determined based on the borrower’s financial statements, inventory reports, accounts receivable agings or equipment appraisals or invoices. Indications of value from these sources are generally discounted based on the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets.

 

From time to time, QNB may extend, restructure, or otherwise modify the terms of existing loans, on a case-by-case basis, to remain competitive and retain certain customers, as well as assist other customers that may be experiencing financial difficulties. A loan is considered to be a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) loan when the Company grants a concession to the borrower because of the borrower’s financial condition that it would not otherwise consider. Such concessions include the reduction of interest rates, forgiveness of principal or interest, or other modifications of interest rates to less than the current market rate for new obligations with similar risk. Loans classified as TDRs are considered non-performing and are also designated as impaired.

 

The concessions made for TDRs involve lowering the monthly payments on loans through periods of interest only payments, a reduction in interest rate below a market rate or an extension of the term of the loan without a corresponding adjustment to the risk premium reflected in the interest rate, or a combination of these three methods. The restructurings rarely result in the forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. If the borrower has demonstrated performance under the previous terms and our underwriting process shows the borrower has the capacity to continue to perform under the restructured terms, the loan will continue to accrue interest. Non-accruing restructured loans may be returned to accrual status when there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally six consecutive months of payments) and both principal and interest are deemed collectible. TDR loans that are in compliance with their modified terms and that yield a market rate may be removed from the TDR status after a period of performance.

 

Performing TDRs (not reported as non-accrual or past due 90 days or more and still accruing) totaled $1,960,000$1,897,000 and $2,578,000$1,960,000 as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. Non-performing TDRs totaled $6,601,000$3,690,000 and $3,299,000$6,601,000 as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. All TDRs are included in impaired loans.

 

The following table illustrates the specific reserve for loan losses allocated to loans modified as TDRs. These specific reserves are included in the allowance for loan losses for loans individually evaluated for impairment. There were charge-offs resulting from loans modified as TDRs of $551,000$909,000 and $0$551,000 during the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively.

 

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

 
  

Recorded

investment 

(balance)

  

Related

allowance

  

Recorded

investment

(balance)

  

Related

allowance

 
                 

TDRs with no specific allowance recorded

 $5,647   -  $2,873   - 

TDRs with an allowance recorded

  2,914  $1,395   3,004  $692 
  $8,561  $1,395  $5,877  $692 

December 31, 2014  2013 
  

Recorded

investment

(balance)

  

Related

allowance

  

Recorded

investment

(balance)

  

Related

allowance

 
                 

TDRs with no specific allowance recorded

 $4,588   -  $5,647   - 

TDRs with an allowance recorded

  999  $813   2,914  $1,395 
  $5,587  $813  $8,561  $1,395 

 

The majority of the TDR concessionsconcession made during the year ended December 31, 20132014 involved a period of interest only, an extension of a maturity date, or a below market interest rate.date. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, QNB had commitments of $1,603,000$1,729,000 and $0,$1,603,000, respectively, to lend additional funds to customers with loans whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings.

 

The following table presents loans, by loan class, modified as TDRs during the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013. The pre-modification outstanding recorded investment disclosed represents the carrying amounts immediately prior to the modification of the loan.

 

 
- 6768 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


      

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 
 

Number of contracts

  

Pre-modification outstanding recorded

investment

  

Post-modification outstanding recorded

investment

  

Number of contracts

  

Pre-modification outstanding recorded

investment

  

Post-modification outstanding recorded

investment

  

Number of

contracts

  

Pre-

modification

outstanding

recorded

investment

  

Post-

modification

outstanding

recorded

investment

  

Number of

contracts

  

Pre-

modification

outstanding

recorded

investment

  

Post-

modification

outstanding

recorded

investment

 

Commercial:

                                                

Commercial and industrial

  1  $757  $757   2  $491  $426   -   -   -   1  $757  $757 

Construction

  2   1,319   1,319   -   -   -   -   -   -   2   1,319   1,319 

Secured by commercial real estate

  1   1,822   1,805   1   2,380   2,311   -   -   -   1   1,822   1,805 

Secured by residential real estate

  12   690   676   10   564   554   -   -   -   12   690   676 

Retail:

                                                

1-4 family residential mortgages

  -   -   -   1   145   137 

Home equity loans and lines

  -   -   -   1   38   37   1  $25  $25   -   -   - 
  16  $4,588  $4,557   15  $3,618  $3,465   1  $25  $25   16  $4,588  $4,557 

 

The following table presents loans modified as TDRs, included above, within the previous 12 months from December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, for which there was a payment default, past due 60 days or more, during the respective year end:

              

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

TDRs Subsequently Defaulted

 

Number of

contracts

  

Recorded

investment

  

Number of

contracts

  

Recorded

investment

  

Number of

contracts

  

Recorded

investment

  

Number of

contracts

  

Recorded

investment

 

Commercial:

                                

Commercial and industrial

  -   -   1  $387 

Secured by residential real estate

  6  $361   10   554   -  $-   6  $361 
  6  $361   11  $941   -  $-   6  $361 

 

The following tables present the balance in the allowance of loan losses disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment method by class of loans receivable along with the balance of loans receivable by class, excluding unearned fees and costs, disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology:

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

  

Loans Receivable

       

December 31, 2013

 

Balance

  

Balance related to loans individually evaluated for impairment

  

Balance related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment

  

Balance

  

Balance individually evaluated for impairment

  

Balance collectively evaluated for impairment

 
 

Allowance for Loan Losses

  

Loans Receivable

 

December 31, 2014

 

Balance

  

 

Balance

related to loans

individually

evaluated for

impairment

  

Balance

related to loans

collectively

evaluated for

impairment

  

Balance

  

Balance

individually

evaluated for

impairment

  

Balance

collectively

evaluated for

impairment

 

Commercial:

                                                

Commercial and industrial

 $2,044  $1,106  $938  $111,339  $10,304  $101,035  $1,892  $1,095  $797  $118,845  $7,115  $111,730 

Construction

  439   121   318   15,929   1,351   14,578   297   -   297   23,471   362   23,109 

Secured by commercial real estate

  2,898   9   2,889   190,602   12,288   178,314   2,700   -   2,700   203,534   11,546   191,988 

Secured by residential real estate

  1,632   639   993   47,672   2,833   44,839   1,630   91   1,539   53,077   1,567   51,510 

State and political subdivisions

  186   -   186   33,773   -   33,773   221   -   221   44,104   -   44,104 

Loans to depository institutions

  4   -   4   1,250   -   1,250   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  103   3   100   8,364   37   8,327   93   -   93   7,685   16   7,669 

Retail:

                                                

1-4 family residential mortgages

  303   63   240   29,730   522   29,208   312   4   308   37,147   341   36,806 

Home equity loans and lines

  583   70   513   59,977   266   59,711   453   4   449   63,213   129   63,084 

Consumer

  64   11   53   3,116   16   3,100   85   -   85   4,175   1   4,174 

Unallocated

  669  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

   318  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

 
 $8,925  $2,022  $6,234  $501,752  $27,617  $474,135  $8,001  $1,194  $6,489  $555,251  $21,077  $534,174 

 

 
- 6869 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

  

Allowance for Loan Losses

  

Loans Receivable

 

December 31, 2012

 

Balance

  

Balance related to loans individually evaluated for impairment

  

Balance related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment

  

Balance

  

Balance individually evaluated for impairment

  

Balance collectively evaluated for impairment

 

Commercial:

                        

Commercial and industrial

 $2,505  $1,309  $1,196  $100,063  $7,753  $92,310 

Construction

  209   -   209   11,061   3,990   7,071 

Secured by commercial real estate

  3,795   619   3,176   192,867   14,931   177,936 

Secured by residential real estate

  1,230   543   687   41,003   2,843   38,160 

State and political subdivisions

  260   -   260   34,256   1,849   32,407 

Loans to depository institutions

  15   -   15   3,250   -   3,250 

Indirect lease financing

  168   13   155   9,685   98   9,587 

Retail:

                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  324   90   234   28,733   456   28,277 

Home equity loans and lines

  582   127   455   54,860   384   54,476 

Consumer

  27   -   27   2,012   -   2,012 

Unallocated

  657  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

 
  $9,772  $2,701  $6,414  $477,790  $32,304  $445,486 


                         
  

Allowance for Loan Losses

  

Loans Receivable

 

December 31, 2013

 

Balance

  

Balance

related to

loans

individually

evaluated for

impairment

  

Balance

related to

loans

collectively

evaluated for

impairment

  

Balance

  

Balance

individually

evaluated for

impairment

  

Balance

collectively

evaluated for

impairment

 

Commercial:

                        

Commercial and industrial

 $2,044  $1,106  $938  $111,339  $10,304  $101,035 

Construction

  439   121   318   15,929   1,351   14,578 

Secured by commercial real estate

  2,898   9   2,889   190,602   12,288   178,314 

Secured by residential real estate

  1,632   639   993   47,672   2,833   44,839 

State and political subdivisions

  186   -   186   33,773   -   33,773 

Loans to depository institutions

  4   -   4   1,250   -   1,250 

Indirect lease financing

  103   3   100   8,364   37   8,327 

Retail:

                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  303   63   240   29,730   522   29,208 

Home equity loans and lines

  583   70   513   59,977   266   59,711 

Consumer

  64   11   53   3,116   16   3,100 

Unallocated

  669  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

  

N/A

 
  $8,925  $2,022  $6,234  $501,752  $27,617  $474,135 

 
- 6970 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


 

The following tables summarize additional information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012:2013: 

December 31, 2013

 

Recorded

investment (after charge-offs)

  

Unpaid

principal

balance

  

Related

allowance

  

Average

recorded investment

  

Interest

income

recognized

 
               

December 31, 2014

 

Recorded investment (after charge-offs)

  

Unpaid principal balance

  

Related allowance

  

Average recorded investment

  

Interest income recognized

 

With no specific allowance recorded:

                                        

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

 $8,222  $8,417  $-          $5,894  $6,056  $-         

Construction

  916   1,140   -           362   444   -         

Secured by commercial real estate

  12,251   12,568   -           11,546   12,198   -         

Secured by residential real estate

  728   839   -           903   1,427   -         

State and political subdivisions

  -   -   -           -   -   -         

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -           -   -   -         

Indirect lease financing

  13   16   -           16   16   -         

Retail:

                                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  250   274   -           225   250   -         

Home equity loans and lines

  135   150   -           72   93   -         

Consumer

  -   -   -           1   1   -         
 $22,515  $23,404  $-          $19,019  $20,485  $-         
                                        

With an allowance recorded:

                                        

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

 $2,082  $2,350  $1,106          $1,221  $1,419  $1,095         

Construction

  435   493   121           -   -   -         

Secured by commercial real estate

  37   37   9           -   -   -         

Secured by residential real estate

  2,105   2,248   639           664   748   91         

State and political subdivisions

  -   -   -           -   -   -         

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -           -   -   -         

Indirect lease financing

  24   27   3           -   -   -         

Retail:

                                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  272   284   63           116   116   4         

Home equity loans and lines

  131   154   70           57   76   4         

Consumer

  16   16   11           -   -   -         
 $5,102  $5,609  $2,022          $2,058  $2,359  $1,194         
                                        

Total:

                                        

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

 $10,304  $10,767  $1,106  $6,732  $34  $7,115  $7,475  $1,095  $9,305  $331 

Construction

  1,351   1,633   121   3,179   46   362   444   -   1,050   2 

Secured by commercial real estate

  12,288   12,605   9   13,765   399   11,546   12,198   -   12,304   344 

Secured by residential real estate

  2,833   3,087   639   3,090   23   1,567   2,175   91   2,452   - 

State and political subdivisions

  -   -   -   1,636   53   -   -   -   -   - 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  37   43   3   63   -   16   16   -   26   1 

Retail:

                                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  522   558   63   495   5   341   366   4   460   5 

Home equity loans and lines

  266   304   70   293   -   129   169   4   169   - 

Consumer

  16   16   11   1   -   1   1   -   2   - 
 $27,617  $29,013  $2,022  $29,254  $560  $21,077  $22,844  $1,194  $25,768  $683 

 

 
- 7071 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)


December 31, 2012

 

Recorded

investment

(after charge-

offs)

  

Unpaid

principal

balance

  

Related

allowance

  

Average

recorded

investment

  

Interest

income

recognized

 
               

December 31, 2013

 

Recorded investment (after charge-offs)

  

Unpaid principal balance

  

Related allowance

  

Average recorded investment

  

Interest income recognized

 

With no specific allowance recorded:

                                        

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

 $5,241  $5,477  $-          $8,222  $8,417  $-         

Construction

  3,990   4,170   -           916   1,140   -         

Secured by commercial real estate

  11,392   12,128   -           12,251   12,568   -         

Secured by residential real estate

  897   912   -           728   839   -         

State and political subdivisions

  1,849   1,850   -           -   -   -         

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -           -   -   -         

Indirect lease financing

  37   44   -           13   16   -         

Retail:

                                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  181   198   -           250   274   -         

Home equity loans and lines

  184   196   -           135   150   -         

Consumer

  -   -   -           -   -   -         
 $23,771  $24,975  $-          $22,515  $23,404  $-         
                                        

With an allowance recorded:

                                        

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

 $2,512  $2,687  $1,309          $2,082  $2,350  $1,106         

Construction

  -   -   -           435   493   121         

Secured by commercial real estate

  3,539   4,023   619           37   37   9         

Secured by residential real estate

  1,946   2,024   543           2,105   2,248   639         

State and political subdivisions

  -   -   -           -   -   -         

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -           -   -   -         

Indirect lease financing

  61   67   13           24   27   3         

Retail:

                                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  275   287   90           272   284   63         

Home equity loans and lines

  200   214   127           131   154   70         

Consumer

  -   -   -           16   16   11         
 $8,533  $9,302  $2,701          $5,102  $5,609  $2,022         
                                        

Total:

                                        

Commercial:

                                        

Commercial and industrial

 $7,753  $8,164  $1,309  $7,657  $74  $10,304  $10,767  $1,106  $6,732  $34 

Construction

  3,990   4,170   -   4,972   111   1,351   1,633   121   3,179   46 

Secured by commercial real estate

  14,931   16,151   619   14,883   541   12,288   12,605   9   13,765   399 

Secured by residential real estate

  2,843   2,936   543   2,439   47   2,833   3,087   639   3,090   23 

State and political subdivisions

  1,849   1,850   -   1,478   64   -   -   -   1,636   53 

Loans to depository institutions

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Indirect lease financing

  98   111   13   86   -   37   43   3   63   - 

Retail:

                                        

1-4 family residential mortgages

  456   485   90   518   5   522   558   63   495   5 

Home equity loans and lines

  384   410   127   510   5   266   304   70   293   - 

Consumer

  -   -   -   -   -   16   16   11   1   - 
 $32,304  $34,277  $2,701  $32,543  $847  $27,617  $29,013  $2,022  $29,254  $560 

 

 

 
- 7172 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 6 – Premises and Equipment


 

Premises and equipment, stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization, are summarized below:

      

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Land and buildings

 $10,763  $9,537  $11,138  $10,763 

Furniture and equipment

  12,022   11,352   12,576   12,022 

Leasehold improvements

  2,304   2,304   2,313   2,304 

Book value

  25,089   23,193   26,027   25,089 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (15,214)  (14,220)  (16,325)  (15,214)

Net book value

 $9,875  $8,973  $9,702  $9,875 

  

Depreciation and amortization expense on premises and equipment amounted to $1,146,000$1,167,000 and $1,010,000$1,146,000 for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively.

  

 

Note 7 – Intangible Assets andLoanServicing


 

Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of mortgage loans serviced for others were $81,750,000$79,572,000 and $77,654,000$81,750,000 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively.

 

The following table reflects the activity of mortgage servicing rights for the periods indicated:

      

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Balance at beginning of year

 $448  $490  $519  $448 

Mortgage servicing rights capitalized

  126   153   48   126 

Mortgage servicing rights amortized

  (92)  (142)  (71)  (92)

Fair market value adjustments

  37   (53)  8   37 

Balance at end of year

 $519  $448  $504  $519 

 

The balance of these mortgage servicing rights are included in other assets at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 and the fair value of these rights was $643,000$601,000 and $464,000,$643,000, respectively. The fair value of servicing rights was determined using discount rates ranging from 10% to 12% for 2013both 2014 and 10% to 11% for 2012.2013.

 

The annual estimated amortization expense of intangible assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:

     

2015

 $92 

2016

  76 

2017

  63 

2018

  52 

2019

  43 

 

2014

 $88 

2015

  73 

2016

  61 

2017

  51 

2018

  43 

On November 26, 2014, QNB transferred its former internet domain name to a third party and recorded a gain of $1,000,000, as disclosed in a Form 8-K filing dated December 2, 2014. As a result of the purchase of an additional domain name, QNB recorded the purchase price of $8,000 as an intangible asset in other assets in 2014. This asset has no amortization expense as it has an indefinite life.

 

Note 8 - Time Deposits


 

The aggregate amount of time deposits, including deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more, was $239,545,000$243,247,000 and $269,234,000$239,545,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Time deposits that meet or exceed the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2012,2013 were $34,118,000 and $29,765,000, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2013,2014, the scheduled maturities of time deposits were as follows:

     

2015

 $115,347 

2016

  49,873 

2017

  34,615 

2018

  23,019 

2019

  20,393 

Thereafter

  - 

Total time deposits

 $243,247 

 

2014

 $101,446 

2015

  60,604 

2016

  36,780 

2017

  19,533 

2018

  21,182 

Thereafter

  - 

Total time deposits

 $239,545 

 

 
- 7273 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 9 - Short-Term Borrowings


       

December 31,

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(a)

  

Other short-term

borrowings (b)

 

2014

        

Balance

 $35,189  $- 

Maximum indebtedness at any month end

  35,189   - 

Daily average indebtedness outstanding

  29,574   2,042 

Average rate paid for the year

  0.37%  0.30%

Average rate on period-end borrowings

  0.37   - 

2013

        

Balance

 $35,156  $- 

Maximum indebtedness at any month end

  35,156   - 

Daily average indebtedness outstanding

  29,684   59 

Average rate paid for the year

  0.37%  0.21%

Average rate on period-end borrowings

  0.37   - 

 

December 31,

 

Securities sold under agreements torepurchase(a)

  

Other short-term

borrowings (b)

 

2013

        

Balance

 $35,156  $- 

Maximum indebtedness at any month end

  35,156   - 

Daily average indebtedness outstanding

  29,684   59 

Average rate paid for the year

  0.37%  0.21%

Average rate on period-end borrowings

  0.37   - 

2012

        

Balance

 $27,988  $4,500 

Maximum indebtedness at any month end

  27,988   13,223 

Daily average indebtedness outstanding

  23,793   1,054 

Average rate paid for the year

  0.44%  0.34%

Average rate on period-end borrowings

  0.37   0.25 

(a)

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase mature overnight. The repurchase agreements were collateralized by U.S. Government mortgage-backed securities and CMOs with an amortized cost of $54,983,000$47,501,000 and $36,886,000$54,983,000 and a fair value of $54,441,000$47,719,000 and $37,915,000$54,441,000 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. These securities are held in safekeeping at the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

(b)

Other short-term borrowings include Federal funds purchased and overnight borrowings from the FHLB.

 

The Bank has twothree unsecured Federal funds lines granted by correspondent banks totaling $26,000,000.$31,000,000. Federal funds purchased under these lines were $0 at both December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.

 

 

Note 10 - Long-Term Debt


 

Under terms of its agreement with the FHLB, QNB maintains otherwise unencumbered qualifying assets (principally 1-4 family residential mortgage loans and U.S. Government and agency notes, bonds, and mortgage-backed securities) in the amount of at least as much as its advances from the FHLB. QNB’s FHLB stock of $1,752,000$635,000 and $2,232,000$1,752,000 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, is also pledged to secure these advances.

 

QNB has a maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB of approximately $216,920,000. At December 31, 2013,$227,142,000. QNB had no borrowings outstanding with the FHLB. QNB had $4,500,000 in borrowings outstanding with the FHLB at December 31, 2012. These borrowings are reported in Note 9 as other short-term borrowings.2014 or December 31, 2013.

 

Repurchase agreements are treated as financings with the obligations to repurchase securities sold reflected as a liability in the balance sheet. The dollar amount of securities underlying the agreements remains recorded as an asset, although the securities underlying the agreements are delivered to the broker who arranged the transactions. The broker/dealer who participated with the Company in these agreements is PNC Bank. Securities underlying sales of securities under repurchase agreements consisted of municipal securities that had an amortized cost of $5,799,000 and a fair value of $5,961,000QNB repaid this borrowing at December 31, 2013.maturity in 2014. 

               
  

2014

  

2013

 

Maturity date

 

Balance

  

Weighted

average rate

  

Balance

  

Weighted

average rate

 

2014

 $-   -  $5,0001   4.77%

  

2013

  

2012

 

Maturity date

 

Balance

  

Weighted

average rate

  

Balance

  

Weighted average rate

 

2014

 $5,0001   4.77% $5,0001   4.77%

1$2,500,000 callable beginning 4/17/10, $2,500,000 callable beginning 4/17/12

 

Long term debt at December 31, 2013 and 2012 also included secured borrowings of $0 and $287,000, respectively.

 

 
- 7374 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 11 – Income Taxes


 

The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:

      

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Current Federal income taxes

 $2,134  $3,018  $2,276  $2,134 

Deferred Federal income taxes

  212   (409)  368   212 

Net provision

 $2,346  $2,609  $2,644  $2,346 

 

At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the tax effects of temporary differences that represent the significant portion of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

      

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Deferred tax assets

                

Allowance for loan losses

 $3,035  $3,322  $2,720  $3,035 

Net unrealized holding losses on investment securities available-for-sale

  1,456   -   -   1,456 

Impaired securities

  546   632   477   546 

Non-credit OTTI on investment securities available-for-sale

  302   335   204   302 

Non-accrual interest income

  569   426   446   569 

OREO expenses

  41   58   44   41 

Deferred rent

  55   45   64   55 

Deferred revenue

  33   40   27   33 

Incurred but not reported (IBNR) medical expense

  24   20   39   24 

Other

  13   26   48   13 

Total deferred tax assets

  6,074   4,904   4,069   6,074 

Deferred tax liabilities

                

Depreciation

  231   258   90   231 

Mortgage servicing rights

  176   152   171   176 

Net unrealized holding gains on investment securities available-for-sale

  -   2,630   671   - 

Prepaid expenses

  149   185   188   149 

Other

  -   2   24   - 

Total deferred tax liabilities

  556   3,227   1,144   556 

Net deferred tax asset

 $5,518  $1,677  $2,925  $5,518 

 

The ability to realize deferred tax assets is dependent upon a variety of factors, including the generation of future taxable income, the existence of taxes paid and recoverable, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities and tax planning strategies. Based upon these and other factors, management believes it is more likely than not that QNB will realize the benefits of the above deferred tax assets. The net deferred tax asset is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

 

A reconciliation of the tax provision on income before taxes computed at the statutory rate of 34% and the actual tax provision was as follows:

               

Year ended December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

 
  

Dollar

  

%

  

Dollar

  

%

 

Provision at statutory rate

 $3,958   34.0% $3,651   34.0%

Tax-exempt interest and dividend income

  (1,212)  (10.4)  (1,249)  (11.7)

Bank-owned life insurance

  (106)  (0.9)  (109)  (1.0)

Life insurance proceeds

  (54)  (0.5)  -   - 

Stock-based compensation expense

  28   0.2   24   0.2 

Other

  30   0.3   29   0.3 

Total provision

 $2,644   22.7% $2,346   21.8%

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

 
  

Dollar

  

%

  

Dollar

  

%

 

Provision at statutory rate

 $3,651   34.0% $4,007   34.0%

Tax-exempt interest and dividend income

  (1,249)  (11.7)  (1,341)  (11.4)

Bank-owned life insurance

  (109)  (1.0)  (113)  (1.0)

Stock-based compensation expense

  24   0.2   25   0.2 

Other

  29   0.3   31   0.3 

Total provision

 $2,346   21.8% $2,609   22.1%

 

 
- 7475 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 12 - Employee Benefit Plans


 

The QNB Bank Retirement Savings Plan provides for elective employee contributions up to the maximum allowed by the IRS and a matching company contribution limited to three percent. In addition, the plan provides for safe harbor non-elective contributions of five percent of total compensation by QNB. QNB contributed a matching contribution of approximately $203,000$224,000 and $184,000$203,000 for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, and a safe harbor contribution of approximately $421,000 for 2014 and $388,000 for 2013 and $371,000 for 2012.2013.

 

QNB’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan) offer eligible employees an opportunity to purchase shares of QNB Corp. common stock at a ten percent10% discount from the lesser of fair market value on the first or last day of each offering period (as defined by the Plan). At the 2011 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved the 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the 2011 Plan), which authorizes the issuance of 30,000 shares. As of December 31, 2013, 9,5512014, 12,790 shares were issued under the 2011 Plan. The 2011 Plan expires May 31, 2016.

 

Shares issued pursuant to the Plan were as follows:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

 

2014

2013

Shares

   3,692    4,044  

                        3,239

                        3,692

Price per share  $20.88 and $21.74  $19.44and$20.88 

$22.32 and $23.40

$20.88 and $21.74

 

 

Note 13 - Stock Option Plan


 

QNB has stock option plans (the Plans) administered by a committee which consists of three or more members of QNB’s Board of Directors. The Plans provide for the granting of either (i) Non-Qualified Stock Options (NQSOs) or (ii) Incentive Stock Options (ISOs). The exercise price of an option, as defined by the Plans, is the fair market value of QNB’s common stock at the date of grant. The Plans provide for the exercise either in cash or in securities of the Company or in any combination thereof.

 

The 1998 Plan authorizes the issuance of 220,500 shares. The time period by which any option is exercisable under the Plan is determined by the Committee but shall not commence before the expiration of six months after the date of grant or continue beyond the expiration of ten years after the date the option is awarded. The granted options vest after a three-year period. As of December 31, 2013,2014, there were 225,058 options granted, 30,44448,194 options forfeited, 164,814 options exercised and 29,80012,050 options outstanding under this Plan. The 1998 Plan expired March 10, 2008.

 

The 2005 Plan authorizes the issuance of 200,000 shares. The terms of the 2005 Plan are identical to the 1998 Plan except the options expire five years after the grant date. As of December 31, 2013,2014, there were 143,200163,200 options granted, 45,00054,625 options forfeited, 12,20032,250 options exercised and 86,00076,325 options outstanding under this Plan. The 2005 Plan expires March 15, 2015.

 

As of December 31, 2013,2014, there was approximately $86,000$65,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over the next 25 months.

 

Stock option activity during 20132014 and 20122013 was as follows:

 

Number

of options

  

Weighted

average

exercise price

  

Weighted average remaining contractual term

(in years)

  

Aggregate

intrinsic value

             

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

  156,275  $21.93         

Exercised

  (32,775)  17.53         

Forfeited

  (15,275)  23.95         

Granted

  20,000   21.35         
 

Number

of options

  

Weighted

average

exercise price

  

Weighted average remaining contractual term

(in years)

  

Aggregate

intrinsic value

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

  128,225   22.72           128,225  $22.72         

Exercised

  (29,825)  20.23           (29,825)  20.23         

Forfeited

  (2,600)  19.79           (2,600)  19.79         

Granted

  20,000   23.20           20,000   23.20         

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

  115,800  $23.51   1.92  $431   115,800   23.51         

Exercisable at December 31, 2013

  57,800  $25.38   0.72  $219 

Exercised

  (20,050)  17.82         

Forfeited

  (27,375)  29.66         

Granted

  20,000   25.16         

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

  88,375  $23.27   1.97  $509 

Exercisable at December 31, 2014

  38,700  $23.29   0.54  $248 

 

 

 
- 7576 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 13 - Stock Option Plan (continued)


 

As of December 31, 2013,2014, outstanding stock options consist of the following:

  

Options

outstanding

  

Exercise price

  

Remaining life

(in years)

  

Options

exercisable

  

Exercise price

 
   11,250  $17.15   0.05   11,250  $17.15 
   13,750   17.25   1.13   13,750   17.25 
   3,000   19.76   1.69   3,000   19.76 
   16,200   20.00   2.07   -   - 
   19,300   21.35   3.07   -   - 
   2,500   22.11   2.66   -   - 
   20,000   23.20   4.06   -   - 
   14,800   32.35   1.05   14,800   32.35 
   15,000   33.25   0.32   15,000   33.25 

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

  115,800  $23.51   1.92   57,800  $25.38 
                
  

Options outstanding

  

Exercise price

  

Remaining life

(in years)

  

Options exercisable

  

Exercise price

 
   9,600  $17.25   0.13   9,600  $17.25 
   2,000   19.76   0.69   2,000   19.76 
   12,550   20.00   1.07   12,550   20.00 
   16,175   21.35   2.07   -   - 
   2,500   22.11   1.66   2,500   22.11 
   16,850   23.20   3.06   -   - 
   16,650   25.16   4.08   -   - 
   12,050   32.35   0.05   12,050   32.35 

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

  88,375  $23.27   1.97   38,700  $23.29 

 

The tax benefits and intrinsic value related to total stock options exercised during 20132014 and 20122013 are as follows:

      
 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Tax benefits related to stock options exercised

 $2  $19  $29  $2 

Intrinsic value of stock options exercised

  91   166   161   91 

 

 

Note 14 - Related Party Transactions


 

QNB has had, and may be expected to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with is executive officers, directors, principal stockholders, their immediate families and affiliated companies. The following table presents activity in theand amounts due from directors, principal officers, and their related interests. All of these transactions were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons. Also, theyThese transactions did not involve a more than normal risk of collectability or present any other unfavorable features.

     

Balance, December 31, 2012

 $2,466 

New Loans

  6,686 

Repayments

  (6,335)

Balance, December 31, 2013

 $2,817 

     

Balance, December 31, 2013

 $2,817 

New Loans

  10,360 

New Loans - New Director Appointed

  8,110 

Retired Loans - Executive Resigination

  (45)

Repayments

  (9,025)

Balance, December 31, 2014

 $12,217 

 

 

Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies


 

Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk:

In the normal course of business there are various legal proceedings, commitments, and contingent liabilities which are not reflected in the financial statements. Management does not anticipate any material losses as a result of these transactions and activities. They include, among other things, commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The maximum exposure to credit loss, which represents the possibility of sustaining a loss due to the failure of the other parties to a financial instrument to perform according to the terms of the contract, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. QNB uses the same lending standards and policies in making credit commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The activity is controlled through credit approvals, control limits, and monitoring procedures.

 

A summary of the Bank's financial instrument commitments is as follows:

       

December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

 

Commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit

 $203,496  $186,137 

Standby letters of credit

  6,276   5,311 

Total financial instrument commitments

 $209,772  $191,448 

 

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

 

Commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit

 $186,137  $138,425 

Standby letters of credit

  5,311   5,332 

Total financial instrument commitments

 $191,448  $143,757 

 

 
- 7677 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies (continued)


 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. QNB evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.

 

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the financial or performance obligation of a customer to a third party. QNB’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. These standby letters of credit expire within two years. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending other loan commitments. The Bank requires collateral and personal guarantees supporting these letters of credit as deemed necessary. The amount of collateral obtained for letters of credit and commitments to extend credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral varies, but may include real estate, accounts receivable, marketable securities, pledged deposits, inventory or equipment. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of such collateral and the enforcement of personal guarantees would be sufficient to cover the maximum potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The amount of the liability as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not material.

The amount of collateral obtained for letters of credit and commitments to extend credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral varies, but may include real estate, accounts receivable, marketable securities, pledged deposits, inventory or equipment.

 

Other commitments:

QNB has committed to various operating leases for several of their branch and office facilities. Some of these leases include renewal options as well as specific provisions relating to rent increases. The minimum annual rental commitments under these leases outstanding at December 31, 20132014 are as follows:

 

Minimum lease payments

   

2014

 $462 

Minimum lease payments

Minimum lease payments

 

2015

  467  $477 

2016

  457   477 

2017

  410   423 

2018

  368   368 

2019

  341 

Thereafter

  3,616   3,276 

 

TheSome of the leases contain renewal options to extend the initial terms of the lease for periods ranging from one to ten years.five years and certain leases allow for multiple extensions. With the exception of the renewals for a land lease related to a permanent branch site, and a renewal for a retail branch location with a renewal in 2014, the commitment for such renewals is not included above.above if they have not been exercised as of December 31, 2014. Rent expense under leases, which includes common area maintenance costs not included in the minimum lease payments above, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, was $553,000 and 2012, was $560,000, and $628,000, respectively.

 

 

Note 16Accumulated OtherComprehensive Income


 

The following shows the components of accumulated other comprehensive income during the periods ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012:2013: 

       

Year ended December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

 

Unrealized net holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities

 $1,975  $(4,281)

Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment loss has been recognized in earnings

  (600)  (889)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  1,375   (5,170)

Tax effect

  (468)  1,758 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 $907  $(3,412)

 

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

 

Unrealized net holding (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities

 $(4,281) $7,736 

Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment loss has been recognized in earnings

  (889)  (984)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

  (5,170)  6,752 

Tax effect

  1,758   (2,296)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 $(3,412) $4,456 

 

 
- 7778 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 16Accumulated OtherComprehensive Income (continued)


 

The following table presents amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the yearyears ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

 

Amount reclassified from

accumulated other

comprehensive income

  

Details about accumulated other comprehensive income

 

Amount

reclassified

from

accumulated

other

comprehensive

income

 

Affected line item in the statement ofincome

 

2014

  

2013

 

Affected line item in the statement ofincome

Unrealized net holding gains on available-for-sale securities

 $867 

Net gain on sale of investment securities

 $1,112  $867 

Net gain on sale of investment securities

Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investmentsecurities

  (43)

Net other-than-temporary impairmentlosses on investment securities

  -   (43)

Net other-than-temporary impairmentlosses on investment securities

  824    1,112   824  

Tax effect

  (280)

Provision for income taxes

  (378)  (280)

Provision for income taxes

Total reclass out of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

 $544 

Net of tax

 $734  $544 

Net of tax

 

 

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments


 

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (fair values are not adjusted for transaction costs). ASC 820 also establishes a framework (fair value hierarchy) for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

 

ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

Level 1:

Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2:

Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).

 

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 

The measurement of fair value should be consistent with one of the following valuation techniques: market approach, income approach, and/or cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). For example, valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables. Multiples might lie in ranges with a different multiple for each comparable. The selection of where within the range the appropriate multiple falls requires judgment, considering factors specific to the measurement (qualitative and quantitative). Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach include matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used principally to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the security’s relationship to other benchmark quoted securities.

 

 
- 7879 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)


 

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used were as follows:

December 31, 2013

 

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)

  

Significant other observable input (Level 2)

  

Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)

  

Balance at end of period

 
            

December 31, 2014

 

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)

  

Significant other observable input (Level 2)

  

Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)

  

Balance at end of period

 

Recurring fair value measurements

                                

Trading Securities

                

State and municipal

  -  $4,207   -  $4,207 

Securities available-for-sale

                                

U.S. Government agency

  -  $71,639   -  $71,639   -   62,665   -   62,665 

State and municipal

  -   87,199   -   87,199   -   72,569   -   72,569 

U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs):

                                

Mortgage-backed

  -   139,723   -   139,723   -   136,192   -   136,192 

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  -   75,394   -   75,394   -   87,662   -   87,662 

Pooled trust preferred

  -   -  $2,069   2,069   -   -  $2,439   2,439 

Corporate debt

  -   6,021   -   6,021   -   6,037   -   6,037 

Equity

 $6,625   -   -   6,625  $7,655   -   -   7,655 

Total securities available-for-sale

 $6,625  $379,976  $2,069  $388,670  $7,655  $365,125  $2,439  $375,219 

Total recurring fair value measurements

 $6,625  $379,976  $2,069  $388,670  $7,655  $369,332  $2,439  $379,426 
                                

Nonrecurring fair value measurements

                                

Impaired loans

 $-  $-  $3,107  $3,107  $-  $-  $3,715  $3,715 

Mortgage servicing rights

  -   -   519   519   -   -   112   112 

Total nonrecurring fair value measurements

 $-  $-  $3,626  $3,626  $-  $-  $3,827  $3,827 

 

             

December 31, 2013

 

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)

  

Significant other observable input (Level 2)

  

Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)

  

Balance at end of period

 

Recurring fair value measurements

                

Securities available-for-sale

                

U.S. Government agency

  -  $71,639   -  $71,639 

State and municipal

  -   87,199   -   87,199 

U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs):

                

Mortgage-backed

  -   139,723   -   139,723 

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  -   75,394   -   75,394 

Pooled trust preferred

  -   -  $2,069   2,069 

Corporate debt

  -   6,021   -   6,021 

Equity

 $6,625   -   -   6,625 

Total securities available-for-sale

 $6,625  $379,976  $2,069  $388,670 

Total recurring fair value measurements

 $6,625  $379,976  $2,069  $388,670 
                 

Nonrecurring fair value measurements

                

Impaired loans

 $-  $-  $3,107  $3,107 

Mortgage servicing rights

  -   -   192   192 

Total nonrecurring fair value measurements

 $-  $-  $3,299  $3,299 

December 31, 2012

 

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)

  

Significant other observable input (Level 2)

  

Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)

  

Balance at end of period

 

Recurring fair value measurements

                

Securities available-for-sale

                

U.S. Government agency

  -  $104,130   -  $104,130 

State and municipal

  -   86,789   -   86,789 

U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs):

                

Mortgage-backed

  -   107,973   -   107,973 

Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)

  -   94,091   -   94,091 

Pooled trust preferred

  -   -  $1,962   1,962 

Corporate debt

  -   2,502   -   2,502 

Equity

 $4,055   -   -   4,055 

Total securities available-for-sale

 $4,055  $395,485  $1,962  $401,502 

Total recurring fair value measurements

 $4,055  $395,485  $1,962  $401,502 
                 

Nonrecurring fair value measurements

                

Impaired loans

 $-  $-  $5,832  $5,832 

Mortgage servicing rights

  -   -   448   448 

Total nonrecurring fair value measurements

 $-  $-  $6,280  $6,280 

 

 
- 7980 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)


 

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which QNB has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

  

Quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements

 

December 31, 2013

 

Fair value

 

Valuation

techniques

Unobservable input

 

Value or range of

values

 

Impaired loans

 $3,107 

Appraisal of collateral (1)

Appraisal adjustments (2)

  -10%to-30% 
      

Liquidation expenses (2)

  0%to-10% 
Mortgage servicing rights  519 Discountedcash flowRemaining term (yrs)  3 - 29 
      

Discount rate

  10% to12% 
    
  

Quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements

 
  

Fair value

 

Valuation techniques

Unobservable input

 

Value or range of values

 

December 31, 2014 - Impaired loans

 $953 

Appraisal of collateral (1)

Appraisal adjustments (2)

  -20% to -100%
      

Liquidation expenses (3)

  -10%

December 31, 2014 - Impaired loans

 $112 

Discountedcash flow (4)

Discount rate

  6.375%

December 31, 2014 - Impaired loans

 $2,650 

Agreement of sale (5)

     

December 31, 2014 - Mortgage servicing rights

 $112 

Discountedcash flow

Remaining term

 

2 - 28 yrs

 
      

Discount rate

  10% to 12%

December 31, 2013 - Impaired loans

 $3,107 

Appraisal of collateral (1)

Appraisal adjustments (2)

  -10% to -30%
      

Liquidation expenses (3)

  0%-10%

December 31, 2013 - Mortgage servicing rights

 $192 

Discountedcash flow

Remaining term

 

3 - 29 yrs

 
      

Discount rate

  10% to 12%

 

(1)

Fair value is primarily determined through appraisals of the underlying collateral by independent parties, which generally includes various level 3 inputs which are not always identifiable.

(2)

Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.

the age of the appraisal.  The range is presented as a percent of the initial appraised value.

(3)

Appraisals and pending agreements of sale are adjusted by management for estimated liquidation expenses. The range is presented as a percent of the initial appraised value.

(4)

Fair value is determined using the cash flow of the borrower and the effective interest rate of the original note.

(5)

Fair value is determined by the net amount due.

 

The following table presents additional information about the securities available-for-sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which QNB utilized significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs) to determine fair value for the year ended December 31:

     
   Fair value measurements using 
   significant unobservable inputs 
   (Level 3) 

Securities available-for-sale

 

2014

  

2013

 

Balance, beginning of year

 $2,069  $1,962 

Settlements

  -   - 

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)

        

Included in earnings

  -   - 

Included in other comprehensive income

  370   107 

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

  -   - 

Balance, end of year

 $2,439  $2,069 

   

   Fair value measurements using 
   significant unobservable inputs 
      

(Level 3)

 

Securities available-for-sale

 

2013

  

2012

 

Balance, beginning of year

 $1,962  $1,929 

Settlements

  -   (121)

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)

        

Included in earnings

  -   - 

Included in other comprehensive income

  107   154 

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

  -   - 

Balance, end of year

 $2,069  $1,962 

- 81 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)


 

There were no transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the yearyears ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. There were also no transfers in or out of level 3 for the same period.periods. There were no losses included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to the available-for-sale securities above with fair value measurements utilizing significant unobservable inputs for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively.

 

The Level 3 securities consist of sevensix collateralized debt obligation securities, PreTSL securities, which are backed by trust preferred securities issued by banks, thrifts, and insurance companies. As discussed in Note 4, despite the fact that there were some trades during December,2014, the market for these securities at December 31, 20132014 was not active and markets for similar securities also are not active. The inactivity was evidenced first by a significant widening of the bid-ask spread in the brokered markets in which PreTSLs trade and then by a significant decrease in the volume of trades relative to historical levels. The new issue market is also inactive and there are currently very few market participants who are willing and or able to transact for these securities.

 

Given conditions in the debt markets today and the absence of observable transactions in the secondary and new issue markets, we determined:

 

The few observable transactions and market quotations that are available are not reliable for purposes of determining fair value at December 31, 2013;2014;

 

An income valuation approach technique (present value technique) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs will be equally or more representative of fair value than the market approach valuation technique used at prior measurement dates; and

 

PreTSLs will be classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because significant adjustments are required to determine fair value at the measurement date.

- 80 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)


 

The Bank is aware of several factors indicating that recent transactions of PreTSL securities are not orderly including an increased spread between bid/ask prices, lower sales transaction volumes for these types of securities, and a lack of new issuances. As a result, the Bank engaged an independent third party to value the securities using a discounted cash flow analysis. The estimated cash flows are based on specific assumptions about defaults, deferrals and prepayments of the trust preferred securities underlying each PreTSL. The resulting collateral cash flows are allocated to the bond waterfall using the INTEXcalc valuation model.

The estimates for the conditional default Default rates (CDR) are based on the payment characteristics of the trust preferred securities themselves (e.g. current, deferred, or defaulted) as well as the financial condition of the trust preferred issuers in the pool. A near-term CDR for each issuer in the pool is estimated based on their financial condition using key financial ratios relating to the financial institution’s capitalization, asset quality, profitability and liquidity. In addition to the specific bank default assumptions, overall deal default rates are modeled. In 2014 and beyond, the CDR rate is calculated based upon a comparison of key financial ratios of active individual issuers without a short-term probability of default compared to all FDIC insured banks. To derive this long-term default rate, a comparison of certain key financial ratios of the active issuers in the security to all FDIC insured banks is reviewed. The active issuers are summarized by creating a weighted average based on issue size, then divided into categories based upon their status of deferral and whether or not a specific default assumption has been assigned to the issuer. To ensure an accurate comparison, the standard deviation across the issuers for each ratio is calculated and any issuer that falls more than three standard deviations above or below the average for that ratio is removed.

The base loss severity assumption and long-term loss severity assumptions are modeled at 95%. The severity factor for near-term CDRsdefault is vectored to reflect the relative expected performance of the institutions modeled to default, with lower forecasted severities used for the higher quality institutions.

Prepayments are modeled to take into account the disruption in the asset-backed securities marketplace and the lack of new pooled trust preferred issuances. For purposes of the cash flow analysis, relatively modest rates of prepayment of 1% were forecasted. In addition to the base prepayment assumption, due to the recent enactment of the Dodd-Frank financial legislation additional prepayment analysis was performed. First, all fixed rate trust preferred securities issued by banks with more than $15 billion in total assets at December 31, 2009 were identified. The current credit rating of these institutions was reviewed and it was assumed that any issuer with an investment grade credit rating would prepay their issuance as soon as possible or July 1, 2015 for bank holding company subsidiaries of foreign banking organizations that have relied on Supervision and Regulation Letter SR-01-1. For those institutions rated below investment grade the holding companies’ approximate cost of long-term funding given their rating and marketplace interest rate was estimated. The following assumption was made; any holding company that could refinance for a cost savings of more than 2% will refinance and will do so as soon as possible, or July 1, 2015. Finally, for issuers not impacted by the Tier 1 regulatory capital legislation enacted by the Dodd-Frank Act, the issuers that have shown a recent history of prepayment of both floating rate and fixed rate issues were identified and it was assumed these issuers will prepay as soon as possible.

 

The internal rate of return is the pre-tax yield used to discount the best estimate of future cash flows after credit losses. The cash flows have been discounted using estimated market discount rates of 3-month LIBOR plus spreads ranging from 4.08%3.78% to 9.68%8.54%. The determination of appropriate market discount rates involved the consideration of the following:

 

the time value of money

 

the price for bearing uncertainty in cash flows

 

other factors that would be considered by market participants

 

The analysis of discount rates involved the review of corporate bond spreads for banks, U.S. Treasury yields, credit default swap rates for financial companies (utilized as a proxy for credit), the swap/LIBOR yield curve and the characteristics of the individual securities being valued. For a further discussion of PreTSL valuation, see Note 4, Investment Securities.

 

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of QNB’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between QNB’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.

 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of each major classification of financial instrument and non-financial asset at December 31, 20132014 and 2012:2013:

- 82 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)


 

Cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable (carried at cost): The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet approximate those assets’ fair value.

- 81 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)


 

Investment securities available for sale: trading (carried at fair value),available-for-sale (carried at fair value) and held-to-maturity (carried at amortized cost): The fair value of securities are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. Level 2 debt securities are valued by a third-party pricing service commonly used in the banking industry. Level 2 fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution date, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things. For certain securities which are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence (Level 3). In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. Management’s best estimate consists of both internal and external support on certain Level 3 investments. Cash flow models using a present value formula that includes assumptions market participants would use along with indicative exit pricing obtained from broker/dealers (where available) were used to support fair values of certain Level 3 investments.

 

Restricted investment in bank stocks (carried at cost): The fair value of stock in Atlantic CentralCommunity Bankers Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank is the carrying amount, based on redemption provisions, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

 

Loans Held for Sale (carried at lower of cost or fair value): The fair value of loans held for sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary market prices. If no such quoted prices exist, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar loan or loans, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.

 

Loans Receivable (carried at cost): The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

 

Impaired Loans (generally carried at fair value): Impaired loans are loans, in which the Company has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. Included in the fair value of impaired loans at December 31, 2014 and 2013 are $2,851,000 and $27,000, respectively, of loans that had no specific reserves required at year end; however, were partially charged-off at year end.

 

Mortgage Servicing Rights (carried at lower of cost or fair value): The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing income. The mortgage servicing rights are stratified into tranches based on predominant characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type and investor type. The valuation incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income.

 

Foreclosed assets (other real estate owned and repossessed assets): Foreclosed assets are the only non-financial assets valued on a non-recurring basis which are held by the Company at fair value, less cost to sell. At foreclosure or repossession, if the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, of the collateral acquired (real estate, vehicles, equipment) is less than the Company’s recorded investment in the related loan, a write-down is recognized through a charge to the allowance for loan losses. Additionally, valuations are periodically performed by management and any subsequent reduction in value is recognized by a charge to income. The fair value of foreclosed assets held-for-sale is estimated using Level 3 inputs based on observable market data.

 

Deposit liabilities (carried at cost): The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity (e.g. demand deposits, interest-bearing demand accounts, money market accounts and savings accounts) are by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e. their carrying amounts). This approach to estimating fair value excludes the significant benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by such deposit liabilities, as compared to alternative sources of funding. Deposits with a stated maturity (time deposits) have been valued using the present value of cash flows discounted at rates approximating the current market for similar deposits.

 

Short-term borrowings (carried at cost): The carrying amount of short-term borrowings approximates their fair values.

 

Long-term debt (carried at cost): The fair value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new long-term debt with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices obtained from this active market represent a fair value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

 

- 83 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)


Off-balance-sheet instruments (disclosed at cost): The fair value for the Bank’s off-balance sheet instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

- 82 -

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)


 

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of the respective period ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each year end.

 

The estimated fair values and carrying amounts of the Company’s financial and off-balance sheet instruments are summarized as follows:

         

Fair value measurements

            

December 31, 2013

 

Carrying

amount

  

Fair value

  

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets

(Level 1)

  

Significant other observable inputs

(Level 2)

  

Significant unobservable inputs

(Level 3)

 
         

Fair value measurements

 

December 31, 2014

 

Carrying

amount

  

Fair value

  

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)

  

Significant other observable inputs

(Level 2)

  

Significant unobservable inputs

(Level 3)

 

Financial assets

                                        

Cash and cash equivalents

 $16,286  $16,286  $16,286   -   -  $18,245  $18,245  $18,245   -   - 

Investment securities available-for-sale

  388,670   388,670   6,625  $379,976  $2,069 

Investment securities held-to-maturity

  146   162   -   162   - 

Investment securities:

                    

Trading

  4,207   4,207   -  $4,207   - 

Available-for-sale

  375,219   375,219   7,655   365,125  $2,439 

Held-to-maturity

  146   156   -   156   - 

Restricted investment in bank stocks

  1,764   1,764   1,764   -   -   647   647   -   647   - 

Loans held-for-sale

  380   394   -   394   - 

Net loans

  492,791   491,635   -   -   491,635   547,281   544,126   -   -   544,126 

Mortgage servicing rights

  519   643   -   -   643   504   601   -   -   601 

Accrued interest receivable

  2,579   2,579   -   2,579   -   2,568   2,568   -   2,568   - 
                                        

Financial liabilities

                                        

Deposits with no stated maturities

 $574,987  $574,987  $574,987   -  $-  $608,345  $608,345  $608,345   -  $- 

Deposits with stated maturities

  239,545   241,959   -  $241,959   -   243,247   244,152   -  $244,152   - 

Short-term borrowings

  35,156   35,156   35,156   -   -   35,189   35,189   35,189   -   - 

Long-term debt

  5,000   5,056   -   5,056   - 

Accrued interest payable

  392   392   -   392   -   344   344   -   344   - 
                                        

Off-balance sheet instruments

                                        

Commitments to extend credit

 $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 

Standby letters of credit

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

 

 
- 8384 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)


         

Fair value measurements

            

December 31, 2012

 

Carrying

amount

  

Fair value

  

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)

  

Significant other observable inputs

(Level 2)

  

Significant unobservable inputs

(Level 3)

 
         

Fair value measurements

 

December 31, 2013

 

Carrying

amount

  

Fair value

  

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)

  

Significant other observable inputs

(Level 2)

  

Significant unobservable inputs

(Level 3)

 

Financial assets

                                        

Cash and cash equivalents

 $15,453  $15,453  $15,453   -   -  $16,286  $16,286  $16,286   -   - 

Investment securities available-for-sale

  401,502   401,502   4,055  $395,485  $1,962 

Investment securities held-to-maturity

  146   166   -   166   - 

Investment securities:

                    

Available-for-sale

  388,670   388,670   6,625  $379,976  $2,069 

Held-to-maturity

  146   162   -   162   - 

Restricted investment in bank stocks

  2,244   2,244   2,244   -   -   1,764   1,764   -   1,764   - 

Loans held-for-sale

  1,616   1,674   -   1,674   - 

Net loans

  467,961   474,330   -   -   474,330   492,791   491,635   -   -   491,635 

Mortgage servicing rights

  448   464   -   -   464   519   643   -   -   643 

Accrued interest receivable

  2,803   2,803   -   2,803   -   2,579   2,579   -   2,579   - 
                                        

Financial liabilities

                                        

Deposits with no stated maturities

 $532,404  $532,404  $532,404   -  $-  $574,987  $574,987  $574,987   -  $- 

Deposits with stated maturities

  269,234   273,878   -  $273,878   -   239,545   241,959   -  $241,959   - 

Short-term borrowings

  32,488   32,488   32,488   -   -   35,156   35,156   35,156   -   - 

Long-term debt

  5,287   5,694   -   5,694   -   5,000   5,056   -   5,056   - 

Accrued interest payable

  487   487   -   487   -   392   392   -   392   - 
                                        

Off-balance sheet instruments

                                        

Commitments to extend credit

 $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 

Standby letters of credit

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

 

 

Note 18 – Parent Company Financial Information


 

Condensed financial statements of QNB Corp. only:

 

Balance Sheets

                

December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Assets

                

Cash and cash equivalents

 $24  $102  $48  $24 

Investment securities available-for-sale

  6,625   4,055   7,655   6,625 

Investment in subsidiary

  69,215   73,002   79,112   69,215 

Other assets

  15   464   3   15 

Total assets

 $75,879  $77,623  $86,818  $75,879 
                

Liabilities

                

Other liabilities

 $254  $-  $464  $254 
                

Shareholders' equity

 $75,625  $77,623  $86,354  $75,625 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $75,879  $77,623  $86,818  $75,879 

 

 
- 8485 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 18 – Parent Company Financial Information (continued)


 

Statements of Income

                

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Dividends from subsidiary

 $3,512  $2,507  $2,925  $3,512 

Interest, dividend and other income

  99   113   142   99 

Securities gains

  629   451   1,045   629 

Total income

  4,240   3,071   4,112   4,240 

Expenses

  285   308   313   285 

Income before applicable income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiary

  3,955   2,763   3,799   3,955 

Provision for income taxes

  151   86   292   151 

Income before equity in undistributed income of subsidiary

  3,804   2,677   3,507   3,804 

Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary

  4,588   6,498   5,491   4,588 

Net income

 $8,392  $9,175  $8,998  $8,392 

 

Statements of Comprehensive Income

                        

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

 
  

Before

tax

amount

  

Tax

expense

(benefit)

  

Net of

tax

amount

  

Before

tax

amount

  

Tax

expense

(benefit)

  

Net of

tax

amount

 

Net income

 $10,738  $2,346  $8,392  $11,784  $2,609  $9,175 

Other comprehensive income:

                        

Net unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities:

                        

Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period

  (11,098)  (3,774)  (7,324)  261   89   172 

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

  (824)  (280)  (544)  (577)  (196)  (381)

Other comprehensive (loss) income

  (11,922)  (4,054)  (7,868)  (316)  (107)  (209)

Total comprehensive (loss) income

 $(1,184) $(1,708) $524  $11,468  $2,502  $8,966 

Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

                        

Year ended December 31,

 

2014

  

2013

 
  

Before

tax

amount

  

Tax

expense

(benefit)

  

Net of

tax

amount

  

Before

tax

amount

  

Tax

expense

(benefit)

  

Net of

tax

amount

 

Net income

 $11,642  $2,644  $8,998  $10,738  $2,346  $8,392 

Other comprehensive income:

                        

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities:

                        

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period

  7,657   2,604   5,053   (11,098)  (3,774)  (7,324)

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

  (1,112)  (378)  (734)  (824)  (280)  (544)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  6,545   2,226   4,319   (11,922)  (4,054)  (7,868)

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 $18,187  $4,870  $13,317  $(1,184) $(1,708) $524 

 

Statements of Cash Flows

                

Year ended December 31,

 

2013

  

2012

  

2014

  

2013

 

Operating Activities

                

Net income

 $8,392  $9,175  $8,998  $8,392 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

                

Equity in undistributed income from subsidiary

  (4,588)  (6,498)  (5,491)  (4,588)

Net securities gains

  (629)  (451)  (1,045)  (629)

Stock-based compensation expense

  71   76   83   71 

Decrease (increase) in other assets

  443   (84)

Increase in other liabilities

  225   - 

Decrease in other assets

  12   443 

Deferred income tax provision

  -   153   29   - 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  3,689   2,371   2,811   3,689 

Investing activities

                

Purchase of investment securities

  (3,763)  (2,132)  (4,955)  (3,763)

Proceeds from sale of investment securities

  2,589   2,092   4,839   2,589 

Net cash used by investing activities

  (1,174)  (40)  (116)  (1,174)

Financing activities

                

Cash dividend paid

  (3,130)  (2,997)  (3,328)  (3,130)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  535   718   628   535 

Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

  2   19   29   2 

Net cash used by financing activities

  (2,593)  (2,260)  (2,671)  (2,593)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (78)  71 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  24   (78)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  102   31   24   102 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 $24  $102  $48  $24 

 

 
- 8586 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 19 - Regulatory Restrictions


 

Dividends payable by the Company and the Bank are subject to various limitations imposed by statutes, regulations and policies adopted by bank regulatory agencies. Under Pennsylvania banking law, the Bank is subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that it may declare without prior regulatory approval. Under Federal Reserve regulations, the Bank is limited as to the amount it may lend affiliates, including the Company, unless such loans are collateralized by specific obligations.

 

Both the Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate actions by regulators that could have an effect on the financial statements. Under the framework for prompt corrective action, both the Company and the Bank must meet capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators. Management believes, as of December 31, 2013,2014, that the Company and the Bank met capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.

 

As of the most recent notification, the primary regulator of the Bank considered it to be “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the classification. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum ratios set forth in the table below.

 

The Company and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented as follows:

    
  

Capital levels

 
  

Actual

  

Adequately capitalized

  

Well capitalized

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

 

Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):

                        

Consolidated

 $93,927   14.06% $53,425   8.00% 

N/A

  

N/A

 

Bank

  86,884   13.14   52,891   8.00  $66,114   10.00%
                         

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):

                        

Consolidated

  85,439   12.79   26,713   4.00  

N/A

  

N/A

 

Bank

  78,824   11.92   26,446   4.00   39,669   6.00 
                         

Tier 1 capital (to average assets):

                        

Consolidated

  85,439   8.65   39,501   4.00  

N/A

  

N/A

 

Bank

  78,824   8.04   39,237   4.00   49,047   5.00 

 

    
  

Capital levels

 
  

Actual

  

Adequately capitalized

  

Well capitalized

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

 

Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):

                        

Consolidated

 $87,330   14.01% $49,871   8.00% 

N/A

  

N/A

 

Bank

  81,076   13.13   49,402   8.00  $61,753   10.00%
                         

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):

                        

Consolidated

  79,037   12.68   24,936   4.00  

N/A

  

N/A

 

Bank

  73,342   11.88   24,701   4.00   37,052   6.00 
                         

Tier 1 capital (to average assets):

                        

Consolidated

  79,037   8.45   37,419   4.00  

N/A

  

N/A

 

Bank

  73,342   7.88   37,215   4.00   46,518   5.00 

 

  

Capital levels

 
  

Actual

  

Adequately capitalized

  

Well capitalized

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

 

Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):

                        

Consolidated

 $80,758   13.60% $47,490   8.00% 

N/A

  

N/A

 

Bank

  76,154   12.92   47,170   8.00  $58,963   10.00%
                         

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):

                        

Consolidated

  73,167   12.33   23,745   4.00  

N/A

  

N/A

 

Bank

  68,754   11.66   23,585   4.00   35,378   6.00 
                         

Tier 1 capital (to average assets):

                        

Consolidated

  73,167   7.96   36,762   4.00  

N/A

  

N/A

 

Bank

  68,754   7.51   36,602   4.00   45,752   5.00 

 

 
- 8687 -

 

 

QNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 20 – Consolidated Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)


 

The unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended 20132014 and 20122013 are in the following table:

 

 

Quarters Ended 2013

  

Quarters Ended 2012

  

Quarters Ended 2014

  

Quarters Ended 2013

 
 

March 31

  

June 30

  

Sept. 30

  

Dec. 31

  

March 31

  

June 30

  

Sept. 30

  

Dec. 31

  

March 31

  

June 30

  

Sept. 30

  

Dec. 31

  

March 31

  

June 30

  

Sept. 30

  

Dec. 31

 
                                                                

Interest income

 $7,676  $7,624  $7,678  $7,606  $8,633  $8,424  $8,276  $8,015  $7,527  $7,588  $7,741  $7,814  $7,676  $7,624  $7,678  $7,606 

Interest expense

  1,343   1,288   1,226   1,176   1,827   1,648   1,553   1,420   1,134   1,091   1,156   1,163   1,343   1,288   1,226   1,176 

Net interest income

  6,333   6,336   6,452   6,430   6,806   6,776   6,723   6,595   6,393   6,497   6,585   6,651   6,333   6,336   6,452   6,430 

Provision for loan losses

  -   100   150   150   300   -   300   300   -   -   -   400   -   100   150   150 

Non-interest income

  1,748   1,239   1,553   1,273   1,566   1,326   1,125   1,392   1,812   1,625   1,517   2,588   1,748   1,239   1,553   1,273 

Non-interest expense

  4,940   5,091   5,123   5,072   4,851   4,828   4,934   5,012   5,212   5,314   5,478   5,622   4,940   5,091   5,123   5,072 

Income before income taxes

  3,141   2,384   2,732   2,481   3,221   3,274   2,614   2,675   2,993   2,808   2,624   3,217   3,141   2,384   2,732   2,481 

Provision for income taxes

  733   490   604   519   750   769   540   550   697   636   580   731   733   490   604   519 

Net Income

 $2,408  $1,894  $2,128  $1,962  $2,471  $2,505  $2,074  $2,125  $2,296  $2,172  $2,044  $2,486  $2,408  $1,894  $2,128  $1,962 

Earnings Per Share - basic *

 $0.75  $0.58  $0.65  $0.60  $0.78  $0.79  $0.65  $0.66  $0.70  $0.66  $0.62  $0.75  $0.75  $0.58  $0.65  $0.60 

Earnings Per Share - diluted *

 $0.74  $0.58  $0.65  $0.60  $0.77  $0.78  $0.64  $0.66  $0.70  $0.66  $0.62  $0.75  $0.74  $0.58  $0.65  $0.60 

* Due to rounding, quarterly earnings per share may not sum to annual earnings per share

 

 
- 8788 -

 

 

ITEM 9.

ITEM 9.      CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

 

ITEM 9A.

ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

The Company’s management,Under the supervision and with the participation of theQNB’s Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and the Chief Financial Officer, or CFO (its principal executive officer and principal financial officer), management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’sQNB’s disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgatedof December 31, 2014. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”),or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to QNB’s management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on and as of December 31, 2013. Based on thatthe date of such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officerour CEO and Chief Financial Officer concludeCFO concluded that the Company’sdesign and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures arewere effective as of such date.the end of the period covered by this Report.

 

b)

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management

Information required by this item is responsible for establishingset forth in Management’s Report and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm which is incorporated by reference into this item.

c)

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

On May 14, 2013, COSO issued an updated version of its Internal Control – Integrated Framework, referred to as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. The Company’s management, with2013 COSO Framework and has indicated that after December 15, 2014 the participation1992 Framework will be considered superseded after December 31, 2014. Management’s assessment of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated theoverall effectiveness of our internal controlcontrols over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2014 was based on the framework1992 COSO Framework. Management will change from the 1992 Framework to the 2013 COSO Framework inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on 2015 and this change is not expected to be significant to our evaluation under the framework inInternal Control—Integrated Framework, the Company’s management concluded that our internaloverall control structure over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.reporting.

 

There have beenwere no changes into the Company’s internal controlcontrols over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) of the Securities Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2013ended December 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

(a) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements and notes included in this annual report have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and as such, include some amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments.

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting.  The system of internal control over financial reporting, as it relates to the financial statements, is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits and management testing and review. Actions are taken to correct potential deficiencies as they are identified. Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only a reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

 

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control — Integrated Framework.Based on our assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective and meets the criteria of theInternal Control — Integrated Framework.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered independent public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered independent public accounting firm pursuant to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that permits the Company, as a smaller reporting company, to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

 

/s/ David W. Freeman ITEM 9B.

/s/ Bret H. Krevolin    

David W. Freeman 

Bret H. Krevolin 

Chief Executive Officer 

Chief Financial Officer 

March 31, 2014 

OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

None. 

 

 
- 8889 -

 

 

PARTIII

 

ITEM 10.

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to information appearing in QNB Corp.’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captionscaptions:

“Election of Directors”

“Governance of the Company - Code of Ethics”

“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance”

“Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors of QNB and the Bank”

“Executive Officers of QNB and/or the Bank”

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to its CEO, CFO and Controller as well as its long-standing Code of Ethics which applies to all directors and employees. The codes are available on the Company’s website at www.qnbbank.com.

 

 

ITEM 11.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the information appearing in QNB Corp.’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captionscaptions:

“Compensation Committee Report”

“Executive Compensation”

“Director Compensation”

“Compensation Tables”

 

 

ITEM 12.

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes QNB’s equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2013.2014. Information is included for both equity compensation plans approved by QNB shareholders and equity compensation plans not approved by QNB shareholders.

         

Plan Category

 

Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

  

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

  

Number of shares available for future issuance under equity compensation plans [excluding securities reflected in column (a)]

  

Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

  

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

  

Number of shares available for future issuance under equity compensation plans [excluding securities reflected in column (a)]

 
 

(a)

  

(b)

  

(c)

  

(a)

  

(b)

  

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by QNB shareholders

                        

1998 Stock option plan

  29,800  $32.80   -   12,050  $32.35   - 

2005 Stock option plan

  86,000   20.29   56,800   76,325   21.84   36,800 

2011 Employee stock purchase plan

  -   -   20,449   -   -   17,210 

Equity compensation plans not approved by QNB shareholders

                        

None

  -   -   -   -   -   - 

Total

  115,800  $23.51   77,249   88,375  $23.27   54,010 

 

Additional information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the information appearing in QNB Corp.’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captionscaptions:

“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”

 

 

ITEM 13.

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the information appearing in QNB Corp.’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captionscaptions:

“Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions”

“Governance of the Company - Director Independence”

 

 
- 8990 -

 

 

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

 

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the information appearing in QNB Corp.’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captionscaptions:

“Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors”

“Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees, Tax Fees, and All Other Fees”

 

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15.

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a)           1. Financial Statements

 

The following financial statements are included by reference in Part II, Item 8 hereof.

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

2. Financial Statement Schedules

 

The financial statement schedules required by this Item are omitted because the information is either inapplicable, not required or is in the consolidated financial statements as a part of this Report.

 

3. The following exhibits are incorporated by reference herein or annexed to this Form 10-K:

 

 

3(i)-

Articles of Incorporation of Registrant, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of Registrant’s proxy statement on Schedule 14-A, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on April 15, 2005)

 

 

3(ii)-

By-laws of Registrant, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on January 23, 2006)

 

 

10.1-

QNB Corp. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement No. 333-91201 on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on November 18, 1999)

 

 

10.2-

The Quakertown National Bank Retirement Savings Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Registrant’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on August 14, 2003)

10.3-

QNB Corp. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-125998 on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on June 21, 2005)

 

 

10.4-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Bret H. Krevolin. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Registrant’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on November 8, 2005)

10.5-10.3-

QNB Corp. 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-175788 on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on July 26, 2011)

 

 

10.6-10.4-

Employment Agreement between Registrant and David W. Freeman. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on December 28, 2012)

 

 

10.7-10.5-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Scott G. Orzehoski. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Quarterly reportReport on Form 10-Q, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on November 9, 2011)

 

 

10.8-10.6-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Jennifer L. Frost. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Registrant’s CurrentAnnual Report on Form 10-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on March 29, 2013)

 

 

10.9-10.7-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Dale A. Wentz. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Registrant’s CurrentAnnual Report on Form 10-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on March 29, 2013)

 

- 90 -

10.8-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Janice McCracken Erkes. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on September 8, 2014)

 

 

21-

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

 

23.1-

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

- 91 -

 

 

31.1-

Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

 

 

31.2-

Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

 

 

32.1-

Section 906 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

 

 

32.2-

Section 906 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

 

The following Exhibits are being furnished * as part of this report:

 

 

No.

 

Description

 
 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document *

 
 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document *

 
 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document *

 
 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document *

 
 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document *

 
 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document *

 
     

 

 

*

These interactive data files are being furnished as part of this Annual Report, and, in accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

 

 

 
- 9192 -

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

QNB Corp.

 

March 25, 2014  10, 2015

 

 

 

 

BY:

 /s/ /s/ David W. Freeman

 

 

 

David W. Freeman

Chief Executive Officer  

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report is signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

/s/ David W. Freeman

Chief Executive Officer,

March 25, 2014  

10, 2015

David W. Freeman

Principal Executive

Officer and Director

/s/ Bret H. Krevolin      Janice McCracken Erkes

Chief Financial Officer

March 25, 2014 

10, 2015

Bret H. Krevolin Janice McCracken Erkes

and Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer

/s/ Autumn R. Bayles

Director

March 25, 2014 

10, 2015

Autumn R. Bayles

/s/ Thomas J. Bisko      

Director   

March 25, 2014  

Thomas J. Bisko   

/s/ Kenneth F. Brown, Jr.       

Director 

March 25, 2014 

Kenneth F. Brown, Jr.  

/s/ Dennis Helf      

Director, Chairman 

March 25, 2014 

Dennis Helf  

Director  

March 25, 2014 

G. Arden Link  

/s/ Anna Mae Papso        

Director 

March 25, 2014 

Anna Mae Papso 

/s/ Gary S. Parzych      

Director  

March 25, 2014 

Gary S. Parzych   

/s/ Henry L. Rosenberger       

Director  

March 25, 2014 

Henry L. Rosenberger   
    

/s/ Thomas J. Bisko

Director

March 10, 2015

Thomas J. Bisko

  
/s/ Edgar L. Stauffer  Director March 25, 2014 
Edgar L. Stauffer

/s/ Kenneth F. Brown, Jr.

Director

March 10, 2015

Kenneth F. Brown, Jr.

  

/s/ Dennis Helf

Director, Chairman

March 10, 2015

Dennis Helf

/s/ G. Arden Link

Director

March 10, 2015

G. Arden Link

/s/ Anna Mae Papso

Director

March 10, 2015

Anna Mae Papso

/s/ Gary S. Parzych

Director

March 10, 2015

Gary S. Parzych

/s/ Henry L. Rosenberger

Director

March 10, 2015

Henry L. Rosenberger

/s/ W. Randall Stauffer

Director

March 10, 2015

W. Randall Stauffer

   

 

 

 
- 9293 -

 

  

QNB CORP.

FORM 10-K

FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20132014

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

 

3(i)-

Articles of Incorporation of Registrant, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of Registrant’s proxy statement on Schedule 14-A, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on April 15, 2005)

 

 

3(ii)-

By-laws of Registrant, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on January 23, 2006)

 

 

10.1-

QNB Corp. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement No. 333-91201 on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on November 18, 1999)

 

 

10.2-

The Quakertown National Bank Retirement Savings Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Registrant’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on August 14, 2003)

10.3-

QNB Corp. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-125998 on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on June 21, 2005)

 

 

10.4-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Bret H. Krevolin. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Registrant’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on November 8, 2005)

10.5-10.3-

QNB Corp. 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-175788 on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on July 26, 2011)

 

 

10.6-10.4-

Employment Agreement between Registrant and David W. Freeman. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on December 28, 2012)

 

 

10.7-10.5-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Scott G. Orzehoski. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Quarterly reportReport on Form 10-Q, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on November 9, 2011)

 

 

10.8-10.6-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Jennifer L. Frost. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Registrant’s CurrentAnnual Report on Form 10-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on March 29, 2013)

 

 

10.9-10.7-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Dale A. Wentz. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Registrant’s CurrentAnnual Report on Form 10-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on March 29, 2013)

10.8-

Change of Control Agreement between Registrant and Janice McCracken Erkes. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, SEC File No. 0-17706, filed with the Commission on September 8, 2014)

 

 

21-

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

 

23.1-

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

31.1-

Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

 

 

31.2-

Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

 

 

32.1-

Section 906 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

 

 

32.2-

Section 906 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

 

The following Exhibits are being furnished * as part of this report:

No.

 

Description

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document *

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document *

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document *

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document *

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document *

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document *

 
    

 

 

*

These interactive data files are being furnished as part of this Annual Report, and, in accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

 

- 94 -