|
|
|
| PAGE | |
Forward-Looking Statements | 3 | ||
PART I | |||
Item 1. |
| 3 | |
Item 1A. | Risk |
| |
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff |
| |
Item 2. |
|
| |
Item 3. | Legal |
| |
Item 4. | Mine Safety |
| |
Information About our Executive Officers |
| ||
PART II | |||
Item 5. | Market for |
| |
Item 6. | Selected Financial |
| |
Item 7. |
|
| |
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures |
| |
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary |
| |
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial |
| |
Item 9A. | Controls and |
| |
Item 9B. | Other |
| |
PART III | |||
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate |
| |
Item 11. | Executive |
| |
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder |
| |
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director |
| |
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and |
| |
PART IV | |||
Item 15. | Exhibits |
| |
Item 16. | Form 10-K Summary |
| |
|
|
PART 1FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
|
This annual report on Form 10-K contains and incorporates by reference “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than those of historical fact. When used in this annual report, the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “will,” “may,” “should” and similar words and expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our then-current expectations and are based upon data available to us at the time the statements are made. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things, statements about the evolving and uncertain nature of novel coronavirus and its related disease (“COVID-19”) global pandemicand its impact on us, the media industry, and the economy in general, our strategies, expected results of operations, general and industry-specific economic conditions, future pension plan contributions, future capital expenditures, future income tax payments, future payments of interest and principal on our long-term debt, assumptions underlying various estimates and estimates of future obligations and commitments, and should be considered in context with the various other disclosures made by us about our business. Readers are cautioned that any forward-looking statements, including those regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of our management, are not guarantees of future performance, results or events and involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results and events may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including, but not limited to, those listed in Item 1A. of this Annual Report and the other factors described from time to time in our SEC filings. The forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
In this annual report on Form 10-K (the “(“Annual Report”), unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the words “Gray,” the “Company,“the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Gray Television, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. For more information on variable interest entities, see Item 8, Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. The discussion herein of the television (or “TV”) stations that we own and operate does not include our interest in the television and radio stations owned by Sarkes Tarzian, Inc.
Our common stock and our Class A common stock are listed on The New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbols “GTN” and “GTN.A.”
Unless otherwise indicated, all station rank, in-market share and television household data herein are derived from reports prepared by The Nielsen CompanyComscore, Inc. (“Nielsen”Comscore”). While we believe this data to be accurate and reliable, we have not independently verified such data nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein and cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such data.
General
We are a television broadcast company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, that ownsis the largest owner of top-rated local television (“television” or “TV”) stations and operatesdigital assets in the United States (“US”). We currently own and/or operate television stations and leading digital assetsproperties in markets throughout the United States. As of February 23, 2018, we owned and operated television stations in 5794 television markets broadcasting over 200 separate programming streams,that collectively reach approximately 24% of US television households. During 2020, our stations were ranked first in average all-day ratings in 70 markets, and ranked first and/or second in 86 markets, as calculated by Comscore’s audience measurement service. We also own video program production, marketing, and digital businesses including over 100 affiliatesRaycom Sports, Tupelo-Raycom, and RTM Studios, the producer of the CBS Network (“CBS”), the NBC Network (“NBC”), the ABC Network (“ABC”)PowerNation programs and the FOX Network (“FOX”). Wecontent, which we refer to these major broadcast networkscollectively as the “Big Four” networks.
In addition to a primary broadcast channel, each of our stations can also broadcast additional secondary digital channels within a market by utilizing the same bandwidth, but with different programming from the primary channel. In addition to affiliations with ABC, CBS and FOX, our secondary channels are affiliated with numerous smaller networks and program services including, among others, the CW Network or the CW Plus Network (collectively, “CW”), MY Network (“MY” or “My Network”), the MeTV Network (“MeTV”), This TV Network (“This TV”), Antenna TV (“Ant.“production companies.”), Telemundo (“Tel.”), Cozi, Heroes and Icons (“H&I”) and MOVIES! Network (“Movies”). Certain of our secondary digital channels are affiliated with more than one network simultaneously. We also broadcast local news/weather channels in some markets (“News”). Our combined TV station group reaches approximately 10.4% of total United States television households.
Our operating revenues are derived primarily from broadcast and internet advertising and from retransmission consent fees and, to a lesser extent, other sources such as production of commercials, tower rentals and management fees. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015 we generated2018 our total revenue of $882.7 million, $812.5 million, $597.4 million,was $2.4 billion, $2.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
Markets and Stations
We operate in markets below the top 50 designated market areas (“DMAs”) and have strong, market leading positions in our markets. We believe a key driver for our strong market position is the strength of our focus on strong local news and information programs.programming. We believe that our market position and our strong local revenue streamsteams have enabled us to maintain more stable revenues compared to many of our peers.
We are diversified across our markets and network affiliations. In 20172020 and 2016,2019, our largest marketmarkets, by revenue, was Springfield, Missouri,were Charlotte, North Carolina and Cleveland-Akron, Ohio which each contributed approximately 5%4% of our revenue in each year.2020 and 2019, respectively. Our top 10 markets by Company revenue contributed approximately 30% and 36%24% of our total revenue forin each of the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.2019. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020, our CBS-affiliated channels accounted for approximately 36% of total revenue; our NBC-affiliated channels accounted for 33% and 36%, respectively,approximately 32% of our revenue; our CBS-affiliated channels accounted for 36% and 35%, respectively, of ourtotal revenue; our ABC-affiliated channels accounted for 18% and 18%, respectively,approximately 14% of ourtotal revenue; and our FOX-affiliated channels accounted for less than 1%approximately 10% of total revenue. We refer to CBS, NBC, ABC and approximately 1%, respectively, of our revenue.FOX as the “Big Four” networks.
In each of our markets, we own and/orand operate at least one television station broadcasting a primary channel affiliated with one of the Big Four networks. We also own additional stations in some markets, some of which also broadcast primary channels affiliated with one of the Big Four networks. MostNearly all of our stations also broadcast secondary digital channels that are affiliated with various networks.networks or are independent of any network. The terms of our affiliations with thesebroadcast networks are governed by network affiliation agreements. Each network affiliation agreement provides the affiliated station with the right to broadcast all programs transmitted by the affiliated network. Our network affiliation agreements with the Big Four broadcast networks currently expire at various dates through December 2021.2023.
Television Industry Background
The Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”(“FCC”) grants broadcast licenses to television stations. There are only a limited number of broadcast licenses available in any one geographic area. Each commercial television station in the United StatesUS is assigned by Nielsen to one of 210 DMAs.designated market areas (“DMAs”). These markets are ranked in size according to their number of television households, with the market having the largest number of television households ranked number one (New York City). Each DMA is an exclusive geographic area consisting of all counties (and in some cases, portions of counties) in which the home-market commercial television stations receive the greatest percentage of total viewing hours. Nielsen periodically publishes data on estimated audiences for the television stations in each DMA.
Television station revenue is derived primarily from local, regional and national advertising revenue and retransmission consent fees. Television station revenue is also derived to a much lesser extent from studio and tower space rental fees and commercial production activities. “Advertising” primarily refers primarily to advertisements broadcast by television stations, but it also includes advertisements placed on a television station’sstation’s website and sponsorships of television programming and off-line content (suchsuch as email messages, mobile applications, and other electronic content distributed by stations).stations. Advertising rates are generally based upon:typically driven by: (i) the size of a station’s market,market; (ii) a station’s overall ratings,ratings; (iii) a program’s popularity among targeted viewers,viewers; (iv) the number of advertisers competing for available time,time; (v) the demographic makeup of the station’s market,market; (vi) the availability of alternative advertising media in the market,market; (vii) the presence of effective sales forcesforces; and (viii) the development of projects, features and programs that tie advertiser messages to programming and/or digital content on a station’s website or mobile applications.
Advertising rates can also be determined in part by a station’s overall ratings and in-market share, as well as the station’s ratings and market share among particular demographic groups that an advertiser may be targeting.
Because broadcast stations rely on advertising revenues, they are sensitive to cyclical changes in the economy. The sizes of advertisers’ budgets, which can be affected by broad economic trends, can affect the broadcast industry in general and the revenues of individual broadcast television stations.
Strategy
Our success is based on the following strategies:
Grow by Leveraging our Diverse National Footprint. We serve a diverse and national footprint of television stations in 57 television markets that cover approximately 10.4% of United States television households.stations. We currently operate in DMAs ranked between 6115 and 209, of which many are markets with universities and/or state capitals.209. We believe markets with universities and state capitals provide significant advantages as they generally offer more favorable advertising demographics, more stable economics and a stronger affinity between local stations and university sports teams than other markets. We also seek to operate in many markets that we believe have the potential for significant political advertising revenue in periods leading up to elections. We are also diversified across our programming, broadcasting over 200 programming streams, including over 100 affiliates of CBS, NBC, ABC and FOX.broadcast programming.
Maintain and Grow our Market Leadership Position.Based on the consolidated results of the four Nielsen “sweeps” periods in 2017, According to Comscore, during 2020, our owned and operated television stations achieved the #1 ranking in overall audience in 4270 of our 57 markets and the #1 ranking in local news audience in 39 of our94 markets. In addition, our stations achieved the #1 and/or #2 ranking in both overall audience and news audience in all 5786 of our 5794 markets.
We believe there are significant advantages in operating the #1 or #2 television broadcasting stations in a local market. Strong audience and market share allowsallow us to enhance our advertising revenue through price discipline and leadership. We believe a top-rated news platform is critical to capturing incremental sponsorship and political advertising revenue. Our high-quality station group allows us to generate higher operating margins, which allows us additional opportunities to reinvest in our business to further strengthen our network and news ratings. Furthermore, we believe operating the top ranked stations in our various markets allows us to attract and retain top talent.
We also believe that our local market leadership positions help us in negotiating more beneficial terms in our major network affiliation agreements, which currently expire at various dates through December 2021,2023, and in our syndicated programming agreements. These leadership positions also give us additional leverage to negotiate retransmission contracts with cable system operators, telephone video distributors, direct broadcast satellite (or “DBS”(“DBS”) operators, and other multichannel video programming distributors (or “MVPDs”(“MVPDs”).
We intend to maintain our market leadership position through continued prudent investment in our news and syndicated programs, as well as continued technological advances and workflow improvements. We expect to continue to invest in technological upgrades in the future. We believe the foregoing will help us maintain and grow our market leadership;leadership, thereby enhancing our ability to grow and further diversify our revenues and cash flows.
Continue to Pursue Strategic Growth and Accretive Acquisition Opportunities. Over the last several years, the television broadcasting industry has been characterized by a high level of acquisition activity. We believe that there are a number of television stations, and a few station groups, that have attractive operating profiles and characteristics, and that share our commitment to local news coverage in the communities in which they operate and to creating high-quality and locally-driven content. On a highly selective basis, we may pursue opportunities for the acquisition of additional television stations or station groups that fit our strategic and operational objectives, and where we believe that we can improve revenue, efficiencies and cash flow through active management and cost controls. As we consider potential acquisitions, we primarily evaluate potential station audience and revenue shares and the extent to which the acquisition target would positively impact our existing station operations. Consistent with this strategy, from October 31, 2013 through December 31, 2017, we have completed 23several acquisition and divestiture transactions, and three divestiture transactions. These transactions addedincluding some that had a net totalmaterial impact on our results of 51 television stations in 31 television markets, including 26 new television markets, to our operations. For more information on these transactions, see Note 23 “Acquisitions and Dispositions”Divestitures” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. This note also describes the stations we acquired in each of 2017, 20162020 and 2015,2019, which we may also refer to collectively as our acquisitions,“acquisitions,” our recent acquisitions“recent acquisitions” or the“the acquisitions.”
Continue to Monetize Digital Spectrum. We currentlyIn addition to each station’s primary channel, we also broadcast over 100a number of secondary channels. Certain of our secondary channels are simultaneously affiliated with more than one network simultaneously.network. Our strategy includes expanding upon our digital offerings and sales. We alsocontinuously evaluate opportunities to use spectrum for future delivery of data to mobile devices using a new transmission standard.
Continue to Return Capital to Our Shareholders. In the fourth quarter of 2016, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $75.0 million of our outstanding common stock (the “2016 Repurchase Authorization”) through December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2017, $69.0 million remained available to purchase shares of our common stock under the 2016 Repurchase Authorization. We plan to continue to return additional capital to our shareholders by repurchasing our common stock from time to time for the duration of the authorization, although any future repurchases will depend on general market conditions, regulatory requirements, alternative investment opportunities and other considerations.
Continue to Maintain Prudent Cost Management. Historically, we have closely managed our costs to maintain and improve our margins. We believe that our market leadership position provides us additional negotiating leverage to enablethat enables us to lower, on a relative basis, our syndicated programming costs. We have increased the efficiency of our stations by automating video production and back office processes. We believe that we will be able to further benefit from our cost and operational efficiencies as we continue to grow.
Further Strengthen our Balance Sheet. During the last several years, we have leveraged our strong cash flow and efficient operating model to grow our diverse national footprint. During 2017 and 2016,In recent years, we acted to improve the terms of our debt by amending or replacing our long termlong-term debt in order to lock in more attractivesecure favorable terms while interest rates are at relativelyhistorically low levels. Also during 2017, During 2020, we issued additional fixed rate debt with extended maturity and used a portion of the proceeds to redeem fixed rate debt that was due to mature in 2024. During 2019, we completed an underwritten public offeringthe acquisition of 17.25 million sharesall the equity interests of Raycom Media, Inc. (“Raycom”) and other related transactions (the “Raycom Merger”) using a financing plan composed of our cash on hand, common stock, at a pricepreferred stock, attractively priced fixed rate debt and an amended term loan facility. We continually evaluate opportunities to improve our balance sheet. For more information regarding the publicRaycom Merger, see Note 3 “Acquisitions and Divestitures” of $14.50 per share. The net proceeds of the offering were $238.9 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and expenses.our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
Stations
The following table provides information about our television stations owned by Gray Television, Inc. as of February 23, 2018:19, 2021:
|
|
|
|
| Primary | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Broadcast | Primary Channel | ||||||||
|
| Station | Network | License | Station | News | ||||||||
DMA | Designated Market Area | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | Rank in | Rank in | ||||||||
Rank (a) | ("DMA") | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | DMA (d) | DMA (e) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
61 | Knoxville, TN | WVLT |
| CBS | 8/1/2021 |
| 2 | 3 | ||||||
61 | Knoxville, TN | WBXX |
| CW | 8/1/2021 |
| 4 | 5 | ||||||
63 | Lexington, KY | WKYT |
| CBS | 8/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
(f) | Hazard, KY | WYMT |
| CBS | 8/1/2021 |
| 2 | 3 | ||||||
67 | Wichita/Huthcinson, KS | KWCH |
| CBS | 6/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
67 | Wichita/Huthcinson, KS | KSCW |
| CW | 6/1/2022 |
| 5 | 4 | ||||||
67 | (Ensign, KS) | KBSD | (g) | CBS | 6/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
67 | (Goodland, KS) | KBSL | (g) | CBS | 6/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
67 | (Hays, KS) | KBSH | (g) | CBS | 6/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
69 | Green Bay/Appleton | WBAY |
| ABC | 12/1/2021 |
| 1 | 2 | ||||||
70 | Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA | WDBJ |
| CBS | 10/1/2020 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
71 | Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, MI | WJRT |
| ABC | 10/1/2021 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
73 | Charleston/Huntington, WV | WSAZ |
| NBC | 10/1/2020 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
73 | Charleston/Huntington, WV | WQCW |
| CW | 10/1/2021 |
| 7 | 5 | ||||||
74 | Omaha, NE | WOWT |
| NBC | 6/1/2022 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
75 | Springfield, MO | KYTV |
| NBC | 2/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
75 | Springfield, MO | KYCW |
| CW | 2/1/2022 |
| 4 | 4 | ||||||
75 | Springfield, MO | KSPR |
| ABC | 2/1/2022 |
| 3 | 2 | ||||||
78 | Toledo, OH | WTVG |
| ABC | 10/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
81 | Madison, WI | WMTV |
| NBC | 12/1/2021 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
86 | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | KWTX |
| CBS | 8/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
86 | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | KBTX |
| CBS | 8/1/2022 |
| 5 | 3 | ||||||
87 | Colorado Springs/Pueblo, CO | KKTV |
| CBS | 4/1/2022 |
| 1 | 2 | ||||||
91 | Cedar Rapids, IA | KCRG |
| ABC | 2/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
96 | South Bend/Elkhart, IN | WNDU |
| NBC | 8/1/2021 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
97 | Burlington, VT - Plattsburgh, NY | WCAX |
| CBS | 4/1/2023 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
100 | Greenville/New Bern/Washington, NC | WITN |
| NBC | 12/1/2020 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
102 | Davenport, IA (Quad Cities) | KWQC |
| NBC | 2/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
105 | Reno, NV | KOLO |
| ABC | 10/1/2022 |
| 2 | 1 | ||||||
106 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KOLN |
| CBS | 6/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
106 | (Grand Island, NE) | KGIN | (g) | CBS | 6/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
106 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KSNB |
| NBC | 6/1/2022 |
| 4 | 4 | ||||||
108 | Tallahassee, FL/Thomasville, GA | WCTV |
| CBS | 4/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
108 | Tallahassee, FL/Thomasville, GA | WFXU |
| MY | 2/1/2021 |
| (h) | (h) | ||||||
110 | Sioux Falls, SD | KSFY |
| ABC | 4/1/2022 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
110 | (Pierre, SD) | KPRY | (g) | ABC | 4/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
112 | Augusta, GA/Aiken, SC | WRDW |
| CBS | 4/1/2021 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
112 | Augusta, GA/Aiken, SC | WAGT |
| NBC | 4/1/2021 |
| 4 | 4 | ||||||
113 | Fargo/Valley City, ND | KVLY |
| NBC/CBS | 4/1/2022 |
| 1 | 2 | ||||||
113 | Fargo/Valley City, ND | KXJB |
| CBS | 4/1/2022 |
| 3 | 4 | ||||||
115 | Lansing, MI | WILX |
| NBC | 10/1/2021 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
129 | La Crosse/Eau Claire, WI | WEAU |
| NBC | 12/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
134 | Wausau/Rhinelander, WI | WSAW |
| CBS | 12/1/2021 |
| 1 | 2 | ||||||
134 | Wausau/Rhinelander, WI | WZAW |
| FOX | 12/1/2021 |
| 4 | 4 | ||||||
137 | Monroe/El Dorado, LA | KNOE |
| CBS/ABC | 6/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
138 | Rockford, IL | WIFR |
| CBS | 12/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
139 | Topeka, KS | WIBW |
| CBS | 6/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
15 | Tampa-St. Pete (Sarasota), FL | WWSB | ABC | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
19 | Cleveland/Akron (Canton), OH | WOIO | CBS | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
19 | Cleveland/Akron (Canton), OH | WUAB | CW | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
23 | Charlotte, NC | WBTV | CBS | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
34 | Cincinnati, OH | WXIX | FOX | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
41 | West Palm Beach/Ft. Pierce, FL | WFLX | FOX | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
49 | Louisville, KY | WAVE | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
50 | Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL | WBRC | FOX | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
51 | New Orleans, LA | WVUE | FOX | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
52 | Memphis, TN | WMC | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
54 | Richmond/Petersburg, VA | WWBT | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
54 | Richmond/Petersburg, VA | WUPV | CW | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
60 | Knoxville, TN | WVLT | CBS | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
60 | Knoxville, TN | WBXX | CW | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
64 | Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, MI | WJRT | ABC | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
65 | Green Bay/Appleton, WI | WBAY | ABC | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
66 | Honolulu, HI | KHNL | NBC | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
66 | Honolulu, HI | KGMB | CBS | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
66 | (Hilo, HI) | KHBC | (d) | NBC/CBS | 2/1/2022 | |||||
66 | (Wailuku, HI) | KOGG | (d) | NBC/CBS | 2/1/2023 | |||||
66 | Honolulu, HI | KSIX | IND | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
67 | Lexington, KY | WKYT | CBS | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
67 | (Hazard, KY) | WYMT | (d) | CBS | 8/1/2021 | |||||
68 | Wichita/Hutchinson, KS | KWCH | CBS | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
68 | Wichita/Hutchinson, KS | KSCW | CW | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
68 | (Ensign, KS) | KBSD | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
68 | (Goodland, KS) | KBSL | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
68 | (Hays, KS) | KBSH | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
70 | Springfield, MO | KYTV | NBC | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
70 | Springfield, MO | KSPR | (e) | ABC | 2/1/2022 | |||||
70 | Springfield, MO | KYCW | (e) | CW | 2/1/2022 | |||||
72 | Omaha, NE | WOWT | NBC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
74 | Charleston/Huntington, WV | WSAZ | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
74 | Charleston/Huntington, WV | WQCW | CW | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
75 | Tucson (Sierra Vista), AZ | KOLD | CBS | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
76 | Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA | WDBJ | CBS | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
76 | Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA | WZBJ | (e) | MY | 10/1/2028 | |||||
78 | Toledo, OH | WTVG | ABC | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
79 | Columbia, SC | WIS | NBC | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
80 | Madison, WI | WMTV | NBC | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
81 | Huntsville/Decatur (Florence), AL | WAFF | NBC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
Stations owned by Gray Television, Inc. (continued):Our television stations, continued:
|
|
|
|
| Primary |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Broadcast | Primary Channel | ||||||||
|
| Station | Network | License | Station | News | ||||||||
DMA | Designated Market Area | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | Rank in | Rank in | ||||||||
Rank (a) | ("DMA") | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | DMA (d) | DMA (e) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
141 | Minot/Bismarck/Dickinson, ND | KFYR |
| NBC | 4/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
141 | (Minot, ND) | KMOT | (g) | NBC | 4/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
141 | (Williston, ND) | KUMV | (g) | NBC | 4/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
141 | (Dickinson, ND) | KQCD | (g) | NBC | 4/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
141 | Minot/Bismarck/Dickinson, ND | KNDX |
| FOX | 4/1/2022 |
| 3 | 4 | ||||||
141 | (Minot, ND) | KXND | (g) | FOX | 4/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
144 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KOSA |
| CBS | 8/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
147 | Anchorage, AK | KTUU |
| NBC | 2/1/2023 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
147 | Anchorage, AK | KYES |
| MY | 2/1/2023 |
| 7 | (i) | ||||||
151 | Panama City, FL | WJHG |
| NBC | 2/1/2021 |
| 1 | 2 | ||||||
151 | Panama City, FL | WECP |
| CBS | 2/1/2021 |
| 3 | 3 | ||||||
154 | Albany, GA | WSWG |
| CBS | 4/1/2021 |
| 2 | (i) | ||||||
156 | Bangor, ME | WABI |
| CBS | 4/1/2023 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
159 | Gainesville, FL | WCJB |
| ABC | 2/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
160 | Sherman, TX/Ada, OK | KXII |
| CBS/FOX | 8/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
160 | (Paris, TX) | KXIP | (g) | CBS | 8/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
169 | Clarksburg/Weston, WV | WDTV |
| CBS | 10/1/2020 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
169 | Clarksburg/Weston, WV | WVFX |
| FOX | 10/1/2020 |
| 4 | 4 | ||||||
170 | Rapid City, SD | KOTA |
| ABC | 4/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
170 | Rapid City, SD | KEVN |
| FOX | 4/1/2022 |
| 4 | 3 | ||||||
170 | (Lead, SD) | KHSD | (g) | ABC/FOX | 4/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
170 | (Sheridan, WY) | KSGW | (g) | ABC | 10/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
173 | Dothan, AL | WTVY |
| CBS | 4/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
173 | Dothan, AL | WRGX |
| NBC | 4/1/2021 |
| 4 | 4 | ||||||
175 | Harrisonburg, VA | WHSV |
| ABC | 10/1/2020 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
175 | Harrisonburg, VA | WSVF |
| FOX/CBS | 10/1/2020 |
| 3 | 2 | ||||||
178 | Alexandria, LA | KALB |
| NBC/CBS | 6/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
180 | Marquette, MI | WLUC |
| NBC/FOX | 10/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
181 | Bowling Green, KY | WBKO |
| ABC/FOX | 8/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
183 | Charlottesville, VA | WCAV |
| CBS | 10/1/2020 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
183 | Charlottesville, VA | WVAW |
| ABC | 10/1/2020 |
| 3 | 5 | ||||||
183 | Charlottesville, VA | WAHU |
| FOX | 10/1/2020 |
| 4 | 3 | ||||||
184 | Laredo, TX | KGNS |
| NBC/ABC | 8/1/2022 |
| 2 | 1 | ||||||
184 | Laredo, TX | KYLX |
| CBS | 8/1/2022 |
| 6 | 8 | ||||||
187 | Grand Junction/Montrose, CO | KKCO |
| NBC | 4/1/2022 |
| 2 | 1 | ||||||
187 | Grand Junction/Montrose, CO | KJCT |
| ABC | 4/1/2022 |
| 3 | 3 | ||||||
190 | Twin Falls, ID | KMVT |
| CBS | 10/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
190 | Twin Falls, ID | KSVT |
| FOX | 10/1/2022 |
| 4 | 3 | ||||||
191 | Meridian, MS | WTOK |
| ABC | 6/1/2021 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
194 | Parkersburg, WV | WTAP |
| NBC | 10/1/2020 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
194 | Parkersburg, WV | WIYE |
| CBS | 10/1/2020 |
| 3 | (i) | ||||||
194 | Parkersburg, WV | WOVA |
| FOX | 10/1/2020 |
| 4 | 2 | ||||||
197 | Cheyenne, WY/Scottsbluff, NE | KGWN |
| CBS | 10/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
197 | (Scottsbluff, NE) | KSTF | (g) | CBS | 6/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
197 | Cheyenne, WY/Scottsbluff, NE | KCHY |
| NBC | 10/1/2022 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
198 | Casper/Riverton, WY | KCWY |
| NBC | 10/1/2022 |
| 1 | 2 | ||||||
202 | Fairbanks, AK | KXDF |
| CBS | 2/1/2023 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
202 | Fairbanks, AK | KTVF |
| NBC | 2/1/2023 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
202 | Fairbanks, AK | KFXF |
| MY | 2/1/2023 |
| 6 | (i) | ||||||
206 | Presque Isle, ME | WAGM |
| CBS/FOX | 4/1/2023 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KNOP |
| NBC | 6/1/2022 |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
209 | (Scottsbluff, NE) | KNEP | (g) | ABC/NBC | 6/1/2022 |
|
|
| ||||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KNPL |
| CBS | 6/1/2022 |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KIIT |
| FOX | 6/1/2022 |
| 3 | 3 | ||||||
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
85 | Burlington, VT/Plattsburgh, NY | WCAX | CBS | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
85 | Burlington, VT/Plattsburgh, NY | WYCI | H&I | 6/1/2023 | ||||||
86 | Colorado Springs/Pueblo, CO | KKTV | CBS | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
87 | Savannah, GA | WTOC | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
88 | Charleston, SC | WCSC | CBS | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
89 | Myrtle Beach/Florence, SC | WMBF | NBC | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
91 | Paducah, KY/Cape Girardeau, MO/Harrisburg, IL | KFVS | CBS | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
91 | Paducah, KY/Cape Girardeau, MO/Harrisburg, IL | WQWQ | (e) | CW | 8/1/2021 | |||||
92 | Cedar Rapids/Waterloo/Iowa City/Dubuque, IA | KCRG | ABC | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
93 | Baton Rouge, LA | WAFB | CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
93 | Baton Rouge, LA | WBXH | (e) | MY | 6/1/2021 | |||||
94 | South Bend/Elkhart, IN | WNDU | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
95 | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | KWTX | CBS | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
95 | (Bryan, TX) | KBTX | (d) | CBS | 8/1/2022 | |||||
95 | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | KNCT | CW | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
96 | Shreveport, LA | KSLA | CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
97 | Jackson, MS | WLBT | NBC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
98 | Greenville/New Bern, NC/Washington, DC | WITN | NBC | 12/1/2020 | ||||||
101 | Davenport/Rock Island/Moline, IA | KWQC | NBC | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
106 | Boise, ID | KNIN | FOX | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
107 | Evansville, IN | WFIE | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
108 | Lansing, MI | WILX | NBC | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
109 | Reno, NV | KOLO | ABC | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
111 | Augusta, GA/Aiken, SC | WRDW | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
111 | Augusta, GA/Aiken, SC | WAGT | (e) | NBC | 4/1/2021 | |||||
112 | Tyler/Longview (Lufkin and Nacogdoches), TX | KLTV | ABC | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
112 | (Lufkin, TX) | KTRE | (d) | ABC | 8/1/2022 | |||||
113 | Tallahassee, FL/Thomasville, GA | WCTV | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
113 | Tallahassee, FL/Thomasville, GA | WFXU | (e) | ME | 4/1/2022 | |||||
114 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KOLN | CBS | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
114 | (Grand Island, NE) | KGIN | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
114 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KSNB | NBC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
114 | (Hastings, NE) | KNHL | ME/MY | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
114 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KCWH | (e) | CW | 6/1/2022 | |||||
115 | Sioux Falls/Mitchell, SD | KSFY | ABC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
115 | (Pierre, SD) | KPRY | (d) | ABC | 4/1/2022 | |||||
115 | Sioux Falls/Mitchell, SD | KDLT | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
115 | (Mitchell, SD) | KDLV | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
119 | Montgomery/Selma, AL | WSFA | NBC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
120 | Fargo/Valley City, ND | KVLY | NBC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
120 | Fargo/Valley City, ND | KXJB | (e) | CBS | 4/1/2022 | |||||
123 | La Crosse/Eau Claire, WI | WEAU | NBC | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
124 | Wilmington, NC | WECT | NBC | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
Our television stations, continued:
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
129 | Columbus, GA/Opelika, AL | WTVM | ABC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
132 | Rockford, IL | WIFR | (e) | CBS | 9/13/2021 | |||||
134 | Wausau/Rhinelander, WI | WSAW | CBS | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
134 | Wausau/Rhinelander, WI | WZAW | (e) | FOX | 12/1/2021 | |||||
137 | Amarillo, TX | KFDA | CBS | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
137 | (Clovis, NM) | KZBZ | (d) | CBS | 10/1/2022 | |||||
137 | Amarillo, TX | KEYU | TEL | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
139 | Panama City, FL | WJHG | NBC | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
139 | Panama City, FL | WECP | (e) | CBS | 2/1/2021 | |||||
140 | Topeka, KS | WIBW | CBS | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KCBD | NBC | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KLCW | CW | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KXTQ | (e) | TEL | 8/1/2022 | |||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KMYL | (e) | MY | 8/1/2022 | |||||
143 | Minot/Bismark/Dickinson/Williston, ND | KFYR | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
143 | (Minot, ND) | KMOT | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
143 | (Williston, ND) | KUMV | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
143 | (Dickinson, ND) | KQCD | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
145 | Monroe, LA/El Dorado, AR | KNOE | CBS/ABC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
148 | Anchorage, AK | KTUU | NBC | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
148 | Anchorage, AK | KYES | (e) | CBS | 2/1/2023 | |||||
150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KOSA | CBS | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
150 | (Big Springs) | KCWO | (d) | CW | 8/1/2022 | |||||
150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KWWT | MY | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KTLE | (e) | TEL | 8/1/2022 | |||||
151 | Bangor, ME | WABI | CBS | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
153 | Bikoxi/Gulfport, MS | WLOX | ABC/CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
154 | Wichita Falls, TX/Lawton, OK | KSWO | ABC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
154 | Wichita Falls, TX/Lawton, OK | KKTM | (e) | TEL | 6/1/2022 | |||||
160 | Gainesville, FL | WCJB | ABC | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
161 | Albany, GA | WALB | NBC/ABC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
161 | Albany, GA | WGCW | (e) | CW | 4/1/2021 | |||||
163 | Sherman/Ada, TX | KXII | CBS/FOX | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
168 | Hattiesburg/Laurel, MS | WDAM | NBC/ABC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
170 | Lake Charles, LA | KPLC | NBC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
171 | Harrisonburg, VA | WHSV | ABC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
171 | Harrisonburg, VA | WSVF | (e) | FOX/CBS | 10/1/2028 | |||||
173 | Rapid City, SD | KOTA | ABC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
173 | Rapid City, SD | KEVN | (e) | FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
173 | (Lead, SD) | KHSD | (d) | ABC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
173 | (Sheridan, WY) | KSGW | (d) | ABC | 10/1/2022 | |||||
Our television stations, continued:
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
174 | Watertown, NY | WWNY | CBS | 6/1/2023 | ||||||
174 | Watertown, NY | WNYF | (e) | FOX | 6/1/2023 | |||||
175 | Dothan, AL | WTVY | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
175 | Dothan, AL | WRGX | (e) | NBC | 4/1/2021 | |||||
176 | Clarksburg/Weston, WV | WDTV | CBS | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
176 | Clarksburg/Weston, WV | WVFX | FOX | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
177 | Marquette, MI | WLUC | NBC/FOX | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
179 | Bowling Green, KY | WBKO | ABC/FOX | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
180 | Alexandria, LA | KALB | NBC/CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
181 | Grand Junction/Montrose, CO | KKCO | NBC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
181 | Grand Junction/Montrose, CO | KJCT | (e) | ABC | 4/1/2022 | |||||
183 | Jonesboro, AR | KAIT | ABC/NBC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
185 | Laredo, TX | KGNS | NBC/ABC | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
185 | Laredo, TX | KYLX | (e) | CBS | 8/1/2022 | |||||
185 | Laredo, TX | KXNU | (e) | TEL | 8/1/2022 | |||||
189 | Charlottesville, VA | WVIR | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
190 | Meridian, MS | WTOK | ABC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
192 | Parkersburg, WV | WTAP | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
192 | Parkersburg, WV | WIYE | (e) | CBS | 10/1/2028 | |||||
192 | Parkersburg, WV | WOVA | (e) | FOX | 10/1/2028 | |||||
193 | Twin Falls, ID | KMVT | CBS | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
193 | Twin Falls, ID | KSVT | (e) | FOX | 10/1/2022 | |||||
195 | Cheyenne, WY/Scottsbluff, NE | KGWN | CBS | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
195 | (Scottsbluff, NE) | KSTF | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
195 | Cheyenne, WY/Scottsbluff, NE | KCHY | (e) | NBC | 10/1/2022 | |||||
198 | Mankato, MN | KEYC | CBS/FOX | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
198 | Mankato, MN | KMNF | (e) | NBC | 4/1/2022 | |||||
200 | Casper/Riverton, WY | KCWY | NBC | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
201 | Ottumwa, IA/Kirksville, MO | KYOU | NBC/FOX | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
203 | Fairbanks, AK | KXDF | CBS | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
203 | Fairbanks, AK | KTVF | (e) | NBC | 2/1/2023 | |||||
203 | Fairbanks, AK | KFXF | (e) | MY | 2/1/2023 | |||||
206 | Presque Isle, ME | WAGM | CBS/FOX | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
206 | Presque Isle, ME | WWPI | NBC | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
207 | Juneau, AK | KATH | NBC | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
207 | Juneau, AK | KYEX | (e) | CBS | 2/1/2023 | |||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KNOP | NBC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
209 | (Scottsbluff, NE) | KNEP | (d) | NBC | 6/1/2022 | |||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KNPL | (e) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KIIT | (e) | FOX | 6/1/2022 | |||||
(a) | DMA rank and names for the |
(b) | Indicates primary network affiliations. All primary channels and nearly all of our secondary channels broadcast by the stations are affiliated with at least one broadcast network. |
(c) | Indicates expiration dates of primary FCC broadcast |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) | Station is a Class A or low-power television station. |
|
|
|
|
Cyclicality, Seasonality and Revenue Concentrations
BroadcastBroadcast stations like ours rely on advertising revenue and are therefore sensitive to cyclical changes in the economy. As a result, our non-political advertising revenue has improved along with the general economic environment since 2010. Our political advertising revenue is generally not as significantly affected by economic slowdowns or recessions as our non-political advertising revenue.
Broadcast advertising revenue is generally highest in the second and fourth quarters each year.quarters. This seasonality results partly from increases in consumer advertising in the spring and retail advertising in the period leading up to, and including, the Christmas holiday season. Broadcast advertising revenue is also typically higher in even-numbered years due to spending by political candidates, political parties and special interest groups during the “on year” of the two-year election cycle. This politicalPolitical advertising spending is typically is heaviest during the fourth quarter. In addition, the broadcast of the Olympic Games by our NBC-affiliated stations during even-numbered years generally leads to increased viewership and revenue during those years.
Our broadcast advertising revenue is earned from the sale of advertisements broadcast by our stations. Although no single customer represented more than 5% of our broadcast advertising revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 or 2015,2018, we derived a material portion of our non-political broadcast advertising revenue from advertisers in a limited number of industries, particularly the automotive industry. ForDuring the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015, we derived2018 approximately 25%21%, 22%25% and 24%25%, respectively, of our total broadcast advertising revenue (excluding political advertising revenue) was obtained from our customers in theadvertising sales to automotive industry.customers. Revenue from this industry representsmay represent a higher percentage of total revenue in odd-numbered years due to, among other things, the increased availability of advertising time, as a result of such years being the “off year” of the two yeartwo-year election cycle.
Station Network Affiliations. In addition to affiliations with ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX, our secondary channels are affiliated with numerous smaller networks and program services including, among others, the CW Network or the CW Plus Network (collectively, “CW”), MY Network, the MeTV Network, Justice, Circle, This TV Network, Antenna TV, Telemundo, Cozi, Heroes and Icons and MOVIES! Network. Certain of our secondary digital channels are affiliated with more than one network simultaneously. We also broadcast independent and local news/weather channels in some markets.
On January 1, 2020, Circle Media, LLC (“Circle”), a Nashville, Tennessee based joint venture between Opry Entertainment Group, a subsidiary of Ryman Hospitality Properties, and Gray launched a new country music and lifestyle television network on secondary channels of numerous television stations. Circle offers various content including entertainment news, documentaries, movies, archival, new and licensed programming, Grand Ole Opry performances, and more. Circle is currently broadcast on Gray television stations in approximately 75% of our markets as well as on stations in markets such as New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Atlanta, Nashville and many others through separate distribution agreements with CBS television stations, Meredith Corporation, and other broadcasters. Circle is also available on streaming platforms including Samsung TV Plus, The Roku Channel, Xumo, Redbox and Vizio.
The Big Four major broadcast networks dominate broadcast television in terms of the amount of viewership that their original programming attracts. The “Big Three” major broadcast networks of CBS, NBC and ABC provide their respective network affiliates with a majority of the programming broadcast each day. FOX CW and My NetworkCW provide their affiliates with a smaller portion of each day’s programming compared to the Big Three networks. The CW Plus Network generally provides programming for the entire broadcast day for CW affiliates in markets smaller than the top 100 DMAs.
We believe most successful commercial television stations obtain their brand identity from locally produced news programs. Notwithstanding this,programs; however, the affiliation of a station’s channels with one of the Big Four major networks can have a significant impact on the station’s programming, revenues, expenses and operations. A typical network provides an affiliate with network programming in exchange for a substantial majority of the advertising time available for sale during the airing of the network programs. The network then sells this advertising time and retains the revenue. The affiliate sells the remaining advertising time available within the network programming and non-network programming, and the affiliate retains most or all of such revenue from these sales.revenues. In seeking to acquire programming to supplement network-supplied programming, which we believe is critical to maximizing affiliate revenue, affiliates compete primarily with other affiliates and independent stations in their markets as well as,and, in certain cases, various national non-broadcast networks (“cable networks”) and various video streaming services that present competitive programming. The Big Four networks and CW charge fees to their affiliates for receiving network programming.
A television station may also acquire programming through barter arrangements. Under a programming barter arrangement, a national program distributor retains a fixed amount of advertising time within the program in exchange for the programming it supplies. The television station may pay a fixed fee for such programming.
We record revenue and expense for trade transactions involving the exchange of tangible goods or services with our customers. The revenue is recorded at the time the advertisement is broadcast and the expense is recorded at the time the goods or services are used. The revenue and expense associated with these transactions are based on the fair value of the assets or services received.
We do not account for barter revenue and related barter expense generated from syndicated programming as such amounts are not material. Furthermore, any such barter revenue recognized would then require the recognition of an equal amount of barter expense. The recognition of these amounts would not have a material effect upon net income.
Affiliates of FOX CW and MY NetworkCW must purchase or produce a greater amount of programming for their non-network time periods, generally resulting in higher programming costs. However, affiliates of FOX CW and My NetworkCW retain a larger portion of their advertising time inventory and the related revenues compared to Big Three affiliates.
Competition
Television stations compete for audiences, certain programming (including news) and advertisers. Cable network programming is a significant competitor of broadcast television programming. However, noNo single cable network regularly attains audience levels of those ofcomparable to any major broadcast network. Cable networks’ advertising share has increased due to the growth in the number of homes that subscribe to a pay-TV service from MVPDs. Despite increasing competition from cable channels, streaming services, digital platforms, social media, and internet-delivered video channels, television broadcasting remains the dominant distribution system for mass-market television advertising. SignalIn addition, signal coverage and carriage on MVPD systems also materially affect a television station’s competitive position.
Audience. Stations compete for audience based on broadcast program popularity, which has a direct effect on advertising rates. Networks supply a substantial portion of our affiliated stations’ daily programming. Affiliated stations depend on the performance of the network programs to attract viewers. There can be no assurance that any such current or future programming created by our affiliated networks will achieve or maintain satisfactory viewership levels. Stations program non-network time periods with a combination of locally produced news, public affairs and entertainment programming, including national news or syndicated programs purchased for cash, cash and barter, or barter only.
MVPD systems have significantly altered the competitive landscape for audience in the television industry. Specifically, MVPD systems can increase a broadcasting station’s competition for viewers in a market by bringing into the marketproviding both cable networks and distant television station signals not otherwise available to the station’s audience.
Other sources of competition for audiences, programming and advertisers include streaming services, internet websites, mobile applications and wireless carriers, direct-to-consumer video distribution systems, and home entertainment systems.
Recent developments by many companies, including internet streaming service providers and internet website operators, have expanded, and are continuing to expand, the variety and quality of broadcast and non-broadcast video programming available to consumers via the internet. Internet companies have developed business relationships with companies that have traditionally provided syndicated programming, network television and other content. As a result, additional programming has, and is expected to further become, available through non-traditional methods, which can directly impact the number of TV viewers, and thus indirectly impact station rankings, popularity and revenue possibilities of our stations.
Programming.Programming. Competition for non-network programming involves negotiating with national program distributors, or syndicators, that sell “first run” and “off network” or rerun programming packages. Each station competes against the other broadcast stations in its market for exclusive access to first run programming (such as Wheel of Fortune) and off network reruns (such as Seinfeld). Broadcast stations also compete for exclusive news stories and features. While cableCable networks orand internet service providers generally do not compete with local stations for programming, some national cable networks or internet service providers from time to time have acquired programs that would have been offered to, or otherwise might have been broadcast by, local television stations.programming.
Advertising. Advertising. Advertising revenues comprise the primary source of revenues for our stations. Our stations compete with other television stations for advertising revenues in their respective markets. Our stations also compete for advertising revenuemarkets with other media, suchtelevision stations, digital platforms including Google and Facebook, local cable and other MVPD systems, as well as local newspapers, radio stations, magazines, outdoor advertising, transit advertising, yellow page directories and direct mail, internet websites, and local cable and other MVPD systems. In the broadcast industry, advertising revenue competition occurs primarily within individual markets.mail.
Federal Regulation of the Television Broadcast Industry
General.
General. Under the Communications Act of 1934 (the “Communications(“Communications Act”), television broadcast operations such as ours are subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC. Among other things, the Communications Act empowers the FCC to: (i) issue, revoke and modify broadcasting licenses; (ii) regulate stations’ operations and equipment; and (iii) impose penalties for violations of the Communications Act or FCC regulations. The Communications Act prohibits the assignment of a license or the transfer of control of a licensee without prior FCC approval.
License Grant and RenewalRenewal. . The FCC grants broadcast licenses to television stations for terms of up to eight years. Broadcast licenses are of paramount importance to the operations of television stations. The Communications Act requires the FCC to renew a licensee’s broadcast license if the FCC finds that: (i) the station has served the public interest, convenience and necessity; (ii) there have been no serious violations of either the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules and regulations; and (iii) there have been no other violations which, taken together, would constitute a pattern of abuse. Historically the FCC has renewed broadcast licenses in substantially all cases. While we are not currently aware of any facts or circumstances that might prevent the renewal of our stations’ licenses at the end of their respective license terms, we cannot provide any assurances that any license will be renewed. Our failureFailure to renew any licenses upon the expiration of any license term could have a material adverse effect on our business. Under the Communications Act, the term of a broadcast license is automatically extended pending the FCC’s processing of a renewal application. For further information regarding the expiration dates of our stations’ current licenses and renewal application status, see the table under the heading “Markets and Stations.”“Stations”.
Media Ownership Restrictions and FCC Proceedings.Proceedings. The FCC’s broadcast ownership rules affect the number, type and location of broadcast properties that we may hold or acquire. The FCC adopted significant changes to its ownership rules, which took effect in February 2018. In November 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a mandate that vacated the FCC’s changes and reinstated the prior ownership rules. The newSupreme Court of the United States granted the FCC’s petition for certiorari seeking review of the Third Circuit decision. The case was argued before the Supreme Court on January 19, 2021. The reinstated rules will continue to limit the common ownership, operation or control of, and “attributable” interests or voting power in,in: (i) television stations serving the same area; (ii) television stations and radio stations serving the same area; and (iii) daily newspapers and television or radio stations serving the same area. The current rules also limit the aggregate national audience reach of television stations that may be under common ownership, operation and control, or in which a single person or entity may hold an official position or have more than a specified interest or percentage of voting power. The FCC’s rules also define the types of positions and interests that are considered attributable for purposes of the ownership limits, and thus also apply to our principals and certain investors.
The FCC is required by statute to review all of its broadcast ownership rules every four years to determine if such rules remain necessary in the public interest. In November 2017,December 2018, the FCC released an Order that eliminated or relaxed several long-standing mediabegan the new quadrennial review of its ownership rules. Specifically,In its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”), the Order (i) eliminatedFCC is seeking comments on competition in the newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule, (ii) eliminated the radio/television cross-ownership rule, (iii) loosened the existing rules governing ownership of local television marketplace, including: (i) whether its current two-stations to a market limit should be relaxed or tightened; (ii) whether it should modify its general prohibition on owning two stations as described aboveranked among the top-four in a market; (iii) if the FCC’s television market analysis should consider the factors the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) applies to local television issues; and (iv) reversedhow the FCC’s earlier decision to treatFCC should evaluate competition among television joint sales agreements as attributable ownership interests.stations.
Local TV Ownership Rules.Rules. The FCC’s current television ownership rules allow one entity to own two commercial television stations in a DMA as long as the specified service contours of the stations do not overlap or, if they do, at least one of the stations is not ranked among the top four stations in the DMA (the “Top Four Prohibition”). Under its rules adoptedand at least eight independently owned, full-power stations will remain in November 2017, the Commission will consider requests for waiverDMA. Waivers of this rule may be available if at least one of the Top Four Prohibition onstations in a case-by-case basis.proposed combination qualifies, pursuant to specific criteria set forth in the FCC’s rules, as failed, failing, or unbuilt.
Cross-Media Limits. The newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule generally prohibits one entity from owning both a commercial broadcast station and a daily newspaper in the same community. The radio/television cross-ownership rule allows a party to own one or two TV stations and a varying number of radio stations within a single market.
National Television Station Ownership RuleRule. . The maximum percentage of U.S.US households that a single owner can reach through commonly owned television stations is 39 percent. This limit was specified by Congress in 2004. The FCC applies a 50 percent “discount” for ultra-high frequency (“UHF”) stations. In December 2017, the CommissionFCC issued a notice of proposed rulemakingan NPRM seeking comment on whether it should modify or eliminate the national cap, including the UHF discount.
Conclusion.Conclusion. The FCC’s media ownership proceedings are on-going and, in many cases, are or will be subject to further judicial and potentially Congressional review. We cannot predict the outcome of any of these current or potential proceedings.
Attribution RulesRules. . Under the FCC’s ownership rules, a direct or indirect purchaser of certain types of our securities could violate FCC regulations if that purchaser owned or acquired an “attributable” interest in other televisionbroadcast and daily newspaper properties in the same areas as one or more of our stations. Pursuant to FCC rules, the following relationships and interests are generally considered attributable for purposes of television broadcastmedia ownership restrictions: (i) all officers and directors of a corporate licensee and its direct or indirect parent(s); (ii) voting stock interests of at least five percent; (iii) voting stock interests of at least 20 percent, if the holder is a passive institutional investor (such as an investment company, as defined in 15 U.S.C. 80a-3, bank, or insurance company); (iv) any equity interest in a limited partnership or limited liability company, unless properly “insulated” from management activities; (v) equity and/or debt interests that in the aggregate exceed 33 percent of a licensee’s total assets, if the interest holder supplies more than 15 percent of the station’s total weekly programming or is a same-market television broadcast company; and (vi) time brokerage of a television broadcast station by a same-market television broadcast company providing more than 15 percent of the station’s weekly programming.
Management services agreements and other types of shared services arrangements between same-market stations that do not include attributable time brokerage components generally are not deemed attributable under the FCC’sFCC’s current rules and policies. However, the FCC previously requested comment on whether local news service agreements and/or shared services agreements should be considered attributable for purposes of applying the media ownership rules. The Department of JusticeDOJ has taken steps under the antitrust laws to block certain transactions involving joint sales or other services agreements.
To our knowledge, no officer, director or five percent or greater shareholder currently holds an attributable interest in another television station that is inconsistent with the FCC’sFCC’s ownership rules and policies or with our ownership of our stations.
Alien Ownership RestrictionsRestrictions. . The Communications Act restricts the ability of foreign entities or individuals to own or hold interests in broadcast licenses. The Communications Act bars the following from holding broadcast licenses: foreign governments, representatives of foreign governments, non-citizens, representatives of non-citizens, and corporations or partnerships organized under the laws of a foreign nation. Foreign individuals or entities, collectively, may directly or indirectly own or vote no more than 20 percent of the capital stock of a licensee or 25 percent of the capital stock of a corporation that directly or indirectly controls a licensee. The 20 percent limit on foreign ownership of a licensee may not be waived. In September 2016, the Commission adopted an Order that allows broadcast licensees to use streamlined procedures when filing a petition for declaratory ruling seeking FCC approval to exceed the 25 percent foreign ownership benchmark for a parent company. The Commission also clarified the methodology for publicly traded broadcasters to assess compliance with the foreign ownership limits.
We serve as a holding company for our subsidiaries, including subsidiaries that hold station licenses. Therefore, absent a grant of a declaratory ruling, we may be restricted from having more than one-fourth of our stock owned or voted directly or indirectly by non-citizens, foreign governments, representatives of non-citizens or foreign governments, or foreign corporations.
Programming and OperationsOperations. .Rules and policies of the FCC and other federal agencies regulate certain programming practices and other areas affecting the business or operations of broadcast stations.
The Children’sChildren’s Television Act of 1990 limits commercial matter in children’s television programs and requires stations to present educational and informational children’s programming. Broadcasters are effectively required through license renewal processing guidelines to provide at least three hoursa certain amount of children’s educational programming per week on their primary channels and on each secondary channel.channels. In October 2009,July 2019, the FCC issued a Notice of Inquiry (“NOI”) seeking comment on a broad range of issues relatedan Order that adopted sweeping changes to children’s usage of electronic media and the current regulatory landscape that governschildren’s programming rules giving broadcasters increased flexibility in how they choose to serve the availabilityeducational and informational needs of electronic media to children. The NOI remains pending, and we cannot predict what recommendations or further action, if any, will result from it.
Over the past several years, the FCC has increased its enforcement efforts regarding broadcast indecency and profanity and the statutory maximum fine for broadcasting indecent material is currently $325,000$414,454 per incident. In June 2012, the Supreme Court decided a challenge to theThe FCC’s indecency enforcement without resolving the scope of the FCC’s ability to regulate broadcast content. In August 2013, the FCC issued a Public Notice seeking has sought comment on whether it should modify its indecency policies. The FCCpolicies, but has not yet issued a decision in this proceeding, and the courts remain free to review the FCC’s current policy or any modifications thereto.proceeding. The outcomesoutcome of these proceedingsthis proceeding could affect future FCC policies in this area, and we are unable to predict the outcome of any such judicial proceeding, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
EEO RulesRules. . The FCC’s Equal Employment Opportunity (“EEO”) rules impose job information dissemination, recruitment, documentation and reporting requirements on broadcast station licensees. Broadcasters are subject to random audits to ensure compliance with the EEO rules and may be sanctioned for noncompliance.
MVPD Retransmission of Local Television SignalsSignals. . Under the Communications Act and FCC regulations, each television station generally has a so-called “must-carry” right to carriage of its primary channels on all MVPD systems serving their market. Each commercial television station may elect between invoking its “must carry” right or invoking a right to prevent an MVPD system from retransmitting the station’s signal without its consent (“retransmission consent”). Stations must make this election by October 1 every three years, and stations most recently made such elections by October 1, 2017.years. Such elections are binding throughout the three-year cycle that commences on the subsequent January 1. The current carriageelection cycle commenced on January 1, 2018,2021 and ends on December 31, 2020. Our2023. During this period, our stations have elected retransmission consent and have entered into retransmission consent contracts with virtually all MVPD systems serving their markets.
On March 31, 2014,In accordance with STELAR, the FCC amended itshas promulgated rules governing “good faith”that: (i) grant DBS providers the right to seek market modifications based on factors similar to those used in the cable industry; (ii) broaden the FCC’s prohibition against joint retransmission consent negotiations to provide that it is a per se violation of the statutory duty to negotiate in good faith for a television broadcast station that is ranked among the top-fourby prohibiting joint retransmission negotiations by any stations in a market (as measured by audience share) to negotiate retransmission consent jointly with another top-four station in the same market if the stations areDMA not commonly owned. As part of the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014 (“STELAR”), Congress further tightened the restriction tounder common control; (iii) prohibit joint negotiation with anya television station infrom limiting the sameability of an MVPD to carry into its local market unlesstelevision signals that are deemed significantly viewed; and (iv) eliminate the “sweeps prohibition,” which precluded cable operators from deleting or repositioning local commercial television stations are under common de jure control. during “sweeps” ratings periods.
We currently are not a party to any agreements that delegate our authority to negotiate retransmission consent for any of our television stations or that grant us authority to negotiate retransmission consent for any other television station. Nevertheless, we cannot predict how thisthe FCC’s restriction on joint negotiation might impact future opportunities.
The FCC also has sought comment on whether it should modify or eliminate the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules. In March 2020, the FCC sought comment on whether it should modernize its methodology for determining whether a television station is significantly viewed in a community outside of its local television market. Under exceptions to the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules, cable operators and satellite carriers are not required to delete the duplicating network or syndicated programming where the signal of the otherwise distant station is determined to be significantly viewed in the relevant community. We cannot predict thethe outcome of this proceeding.these proceedings. If, however, the FCC eliminates or relaxes its rules enforcing our program exclusivity rights, it could affect our ability to negotiate future retransmission consent agreements, and it could harm our ratings and advertising revenue if cable and satellite operators import duplicative programming.
In June 2014, the Supreme Court issued a ruling finding that theCertain online video distributors (“OVDs”) have explored streaming of broadcast programming over the internet without the consent of the copyright owner of the programming. The majority of federal courts have sided with broadcasters and enjoined OVDs from streaming broadcast programming. Recently, a new OVD, organized as a non-profit, began offering free access to broadcast programming wasin select cities over the Internet. This OVD argues that its retransmission of broadcast signals via the internet is covered by an exemption from copyright liability applicable to non-profit entities. In July 2019, the major broadcast networks and certain affiliated entities filed a public performance that infringed uponcopyright suit in the copyright owners’ rights. BroadcastersUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York challenging this OVD’s operations. That suit remains pending and other copyright owners had aggressively pursued injunctions against the companies offering these services in multiple jurisdictions. OVD has continued its operations.
On December 19, 2014, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”)an NPRM seeking comment on its proposal to modernize the term “MVPD” to be technology neutral. If the NPRM proposal is adopted, an entity that uses the internet to distribute multiple streams of linear programming would be considered an MVPD and would have the same retransmission consent rights and obligations as other MVPDs, including the right to negotiate with television stations to carry their broadcast signals. The FCC also asked about the possible copyright implications of this proposal. We cannot predict the outcome of the FCC’s interpretive proceedings.
STELAR wasIn December 2019, the Satellite Television Community Protection and Promotion Act of 2019 and the Television Viewer Protection Act of 2019 (the “TVPA of 2019”) were signed into law on December 4, 2014. STELAR extendslaw. Among other things, these acts (i) made permanent the rightcopyright license set out in Section 119 of satellite TV operatorsthe Copyright Act; (ii) limited eligibility for use of the Section 119 license to retransmit the signalsignals of network television broadcast stations for an additional five yearsto unserved households to those satellite operators who provide local-into-local service to all DMAs; and grants an extension(iii) modified the definition of their compulsory copyright license forunserved households to those households located in a “short market” (which, in turn, was defined as a local market in which programming of one or more of the carriagetop four networks is not offered on either the primary or multicast stream by any network station in that market). The TVPA of distant TV signals. In accordance with STELAR,2019 also made permanent the FCC has promulgated rulesrequirement that broadcasters and MVPDs negotiate in good faith and adds a provision that (i) grant DBS providers the rightallows MVPDs to seek market modifications based on factors similar to those used in the cable industry and cable operators the right to delete or reposition channels during “sweeps,” (ii) broadened the FCC’s prohibition against joint retransmission negotiations by directing the FCC to prohibit joint retransmission negotiations by any stations in the same DMA not under common control, (iii) prohibitdesignate a television station from limiting the ability of an MVPD to carry into its local market television signals that are deemed significantly viewed, and (iv) eliminated the “sweeps prohibition,” which had precluded cable operators from deleting or repositioning local commercial television stations during “sweeps” ratings periods.
In September 2015, the FCC, in accordance with STELAR, issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to review the “totality of the circumstances test” used to evaluate whether broadcast stations and MVPDs are negotiating for retransmission consent in good faith. We cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding. If, however, the FCC revises the totality of the circumstances test, it could affect our abilitybuying group to negotiate retransmission consent agreements includingon their behalf and (ii) requires large stations groups, such as us, to negotiate in good faith with a qualified MVPD buying group. The rules that the rates that we obtain from MVPDs.FCC promulgated to implement those provisions of the TVPA of 2019 became effective in July 2020.
Broadcast Spectrum. In February 2012, Congress passed legislationDecember 2020, we filed a good faith negotiation complaint against Citizens Telecom Services Company, LLC d/b/a Frontier Communications (“Frontier”) stating that grantedFrontier violated its duty to negotiate in good faith concerning the carriage of WWSB(TV), Sarasota, Florida, WCSC-TV, Charleston, South Carolina, and WMBF-TV, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The stations currently are not being carried on the Frontier systems, and the proceeding remains pending at the FCC.
The Incentive Auction concluded in 2017 requiring the FCC authority to conduct an auction of certain spectrum currently used by television broadcasters. On May 15, 2014, the FCC adopted a Report and Order (the “2014 Report”) establishing the framework for an incentive auction of broadcast television spectrum. The 2014 Report created a two part incentive auction framework (the “Incentive Auction”); (1) a reverse auction pursuant to which a television broadcaster could volunteer, in return for payment, to relinquish all or a part of its station’s spectrum by (i) surrendering its license, (ii) relinquishing a portion of its spectrum and thereafter sharing spectrum with another station, or (iii) modifying a UHF channel license to a VHF channel license; and (2) a forward auction pursuant to which wireless carriers bid for the relinquished spectrum to offer wireless services. In April 2017, the Commission issued a Public Notice announcing the conclusion of the Incentive Auction, which resulted in 84 MHz of broadcast spectrum being repurposed for wireless use.
Now that the Incentive Auction has concluded, the FCC has begun the process of reallocating thereallocate 84 MHz of spectrum to new users. Specifically, the FCC is requiringAs part of this reallocation process, certain television stations that did not sell their spectrum in the reverse auction were required to change channels and modify their transmission facilities.facilities (the “Repack”). The FCC iswas required to use “reasonable efforts” to preserve a station’sstation’s coverage area and population served and cannot require that a station to involuntarily move from the UHF band to the VHF band or from the high VHF band to the low VHF band. The underlying legislation authorizes the FCC to reimburse stations for reasonable relocation costs up to a total across all stations of $1.75 billion. Some television stations are required to change channels and modify their facilities orThese changes may choose to channel share. These stations could incur conversion costs that may not be fully reimbursed, orconstrain our ability to provide high definition programming and additional program streams, including mobile video services, couldservices. The underlying legislation authorizes the FCC to reimburse stations for reasonable relocation costs. In March 2018, Congress adopted the Reimbursement Expansion Act (“REA”) to expand the list of entities eligible to be constrained.
reimbursed for Repack expenses to include LPTV and TV translator stations. The REA also increased the funds available to reimburse full power and Class A stations. The FCC interpreted the implementing legislation to allowprotected only full power and Class A television stations to participate induring the auction and receive contour protection during any post-auction repacking of the broadcast spectrum.Repack. In certain markets, our low power television stations may bewere displaced by this process. Moreover, on June 16, 2015, the FCC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking proposing to reserve one vacant channel in each market for use by unlicensed “white spaces” devices and wireless microphones (the “Vacant Channel NPRM”). The FCC further modified the Vacant Channel NPRM on August 11, 2015 by proposing to reserve up to two channels in certain markets after the Incentive Auction is complete. Under the Vacant Channel NPRM, the FCC would refuse to grant an application to modify the facilities of a low power television station if the applicant could not demonstrate that a sufficient number of vacant channels would remain in the service area of the low power station after the applicant implements the modification – thus, reducing the likelihood that a low power television station would be ableprocess requiring us to locate a new channel. These stations could incur substantial costs to locate and build a replacement facility on a new channel. If a low power television station is unable to locate a new channel on which to operate, it could lose its license.alternate channels for ongoing operations.
We cannot predict the likelihood, timing or outcome of any court, Congressional or FCC regulatory action with respect to the repacking of broadcast television spectrum, nor the impact of any such changes upon our business.
The foregoing does not purport to be a complete summary of the Communications Act, other applicable statutes, or the FCC’sFCC’s rules, regulations or policies. Proposals for additional or revised regulations and requirements are pending before, are being considered by, and may in the future be considered by, Congress and federal regulatory agencies from time to time. We cannot predict the effect of any existing or proposed federal legislation, regulations or policies on our business. Also, several of the foregoing matters are now, or may become, the subject of litigation, and we cannot predict the outcome of any such litigation or the effect on our business.
Human Capital
Successful execution of our strategy is dependent on attracting, developing and retaining key employees and members of our management team. We believe the substantial skills, experience and industry knowledge of our employees and our training of our customer-facing employees benefit our operations and performance. There are several ways in which we attract, develop, and retain highly qualified talent, including:
● | Training and investing in our employees. With competitive wages, healthcare benefits, a defined contribution retirement program and opportunities for job training and advancement, our employees develop skills and expertise necessary to build careers. |
● | Driving a diverse and inclusive culture. We are committed to diversity and inclusion in every aspect of our business. As we strive to deliver high-quality products and services that exceed expectations, we embrace the unique perspectives and experiences of our employees and partners and the communities we serve. We are striving to enhance diversity at every level of our organization, including among our senior leaders. We believe that diversity, equity and inclusion are principles that drive innovation and should guide us as we build our teams. We have been working with a professional consulting and training team to support our diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts since 2019. In the summer of 2020, we accelerated our approach to diversity and inclusion. Every general manager and news director was engaged in a “Foundations in Equity” training series. At the time, we informed all of our employees in writing of our commitment to learning more about social justice and ways we can help our colleagues combat racism and discrimination. We are building on the training from 2020 with pilot programs to continue training and identifying more opportunities for growth. With the support and feedback of these pilot teams, we hope to outline strategies to continue the transformation of our workplace culture. We are listening to the feedback from the pilot program teams and employees in general on these important topics. We continue to encourage and support feedback from all our employees. |
● | Focusing on a safe and healthy workplace.We value our employees and are committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace. All employees are required to comply with company safety rules and expectations and are expected to actively contribute to making our company a safer place to work. In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, we continue to maintain operations while employing the latest guidelines to promote the health of our employees. |
Employees
As of February 23, 2018,19, 2021, we had 3,7157,017 full-time employees and 223245 part-time employees, of which 82225 full-time and foursix part-time employees at foureight stations were represented by various unions. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
34
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
38
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
39
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
51
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
53
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
104
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
104
Item 9B.
Other Information
105
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate InformationGovernance
105
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
105
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
106
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
107
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
107
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
107
Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
111
Signatures
112
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report on Form 10-K contains and incorporates by reference “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than those of historical fact. When used in this annual report, the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “will,” “may,” “should” and similar words and expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our then-current expectations and are based upon data available to us at the time the statements are made. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things, statements about the evolving and uncertain nature of novel coronavirus and its related disease (“COVID-19”) global pandemicand its impact on us, the media industry, and the economy in general, our strategies, expected results of operations, general and industry-specific economic conditions, future pension plan contributions, future capital expenditures, future income tax payments, future payments of interest and principal on our long-term debt, assumptions underlying various estimates and estimates of future obligations and commitments, and should be considered in context with the various other disclosures made by us about our business. Readers are cautioned that any forward-looking statements, including those regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of our management, are not guarantees of future performance, results or events and involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results and events may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including, but not limited to, those listed in Item 1A. of this Annual Report and the other factors described from time to time in our SEC filings. The forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
In this annual report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the words “Gray,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Gray Television, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Unless otherwise indicated, all station rank, in-market share and television household data herein are derived from reports prepared by Comscore, Inc. (“Comscore”). While we believe this data to be accurate and reliable, we have not independently verified such data nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein and cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such data.
General
We are a television broadcast company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, that is the largest owner of top-rated local television (“television” or “TV”) stations and digital assets in the United States (“US”). We currently own and/or operate television stations and leading digital properties in 94 television markets that collectively reach approximately 24% of US television households. During 2020, our stations were ranked first in average all-day ratings in 70 markets, and ranked first and/or second in 86 markets, as calculated by Comscore’s audience measurement service. We also own video program production, marketing, and digital businesses including Raycom Sports, Tupelo-Raycom, and RTM Studios, the producer of PowerNation programs and content, which we refer to collectively as our “production companies.”
Our operating revenues are derived primarily from broadcast and internet advertising and from retransmission consent fees. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 our total revenue was $2.4 billion, $2.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
Markets and Stations
We believe a key driver for our strong market position is our focus on strong local news and information programming. We believe that our market position and our strong local teams have enabled us to maintain more stable revenues compared to many of our peers.
We are diversified across our markets and network affiliations. In 2020 and 2019, our largest markets, by revenue, were Charlotte, North Carolina and Cleveland-Akron, Ohio which each contributed approximately 4% of our revenue in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Our top 10 markets by revenue contributed approximately 24% of our total revenue in each of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2020, our CBS-affiliated channels accounted for approximately 36% of total revenue; our NBC-affiliated channels accounted for approximately 32% of total revenue; our ABC-affiliated channels accounted for approximately 14% of total revenue; and our FOX-affiliated channels accounted for approximately 10% of total revenue. We refer to CBS, NBC, ABC and FOX as the “Big Four” networks.
In each of our markets, we own and operate at least one television station broadcasting a primary channel affiliated with one of the Big Four networks. We also own additional stations in some markets, some of which also broadcast primary channels affiliated with one of the Big Four networks. Nearly all of our stations broadcast secondary digital channels that are affiliated with various networks or are independent of any network. The terms of our affiliations with broadcast networks are governed by network affiliation agreements. Each network affiliation agreement provides the affiliated station with the right to broadcast all programs transmitted by the affiliated network. Our network affiliation agreements with the Big Four broadcast networks currently expire at various dates through December 2023.
Television Industry Background
The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) grants broadcast licenses to television stations. There are only a limited number of broadcast licenses available in any one geographic area. Each commercial television station in the US is assigned to one of 210 designated market areas (“DMAs”). These markets are ranked in size according to their number of television households, with the market having the largest number of television households ranked number one (New York City). Each DMA is an exclusive geographic area consisting of all counties (and in some cases, portions of counties) in which the home-market commercial television stations receive the greatest percentage of total viewing hours.
Television station revenue is derived primarily from local, regional and national advertising revenue and retransmission consent fees. Television station revenue is also derived to a much lesser extent from studio and tower space rental fees and production activities. “Advertising” primarily refers to advertisements broadcast by television stations, but it also includes advertisements placed on a television station’s website and sponsorships of television programming and off-line content such as email messages, mobile applications, and other electronic content distributed by stations. Advertising rates are typically driven by: (i) the size of a station’s market; (ii) a station’s overall ratings; (iii) a program’s popularity among targeted viewers; (iv) the number of advertisers competing for available time; (v) the demographic makeup of the station’s market; (vi) the availability of alternative advertising media in the market; (vii) the presence of effective sales forces; and (viii) the development of projects, features and programs that tie advertiser messages to programming and/or digital content on a station’s website or mobile applications. Advertising rates can also be determined in part by the station’s ratings and market share among particular demographic groups that an advertiser may be targeting.
Because broadcast stations rely on advertising revenues, they are sensitive to cyclical changes in the economy. The sizes of advertisers’ budgets, which can be affected by broad economic trends, can affect the broadcast industry in general and the revenues of individual broadcast television stations.
Strategy
Our success is based on the following strategies:
Grow by Leveraging our Diverse National Footprint. We serve a diverse and national footprint of television stations. We currently operate in DMAs ranked between 15 and 209. We operate in many markets that we believe have the potential for significant political advertising revenue in periods leading up to elections. We are also diversified across our broadcast programming.
Maintain and Grow our Market Leadership Position. According to Comscore, during 2020, our owned and operated television stations achieved the #1 ranking in overall audience in 70 of our 94 markets. In addition, our stations achieved the #1 and/or #2 ranking in overall audience in 86 of our 94 markets.
We believe there are significant advantages in operating the #1 or #2 television broadcasting stations in a local market. Strong audience and market share allow us to enhance our advertising revenue through price discipline and leadership. We believe a top-rated news platform is critical to capturing incremental sponsorship and political advertising revenue. Our high-quality station group allows us to generate higher operating margins, which allows us additional opportunities to reinvest in our business to further strengthen our network and news ratings. Furthermore, we believe operating the top ranked stations in our various markets allows us to attract and retain top talent.
We also believe that our local market leadership positions help us in negotiating more beneficial terms in our major network affiliation agreements, which currently expire at various dates through December 2023, and in our syndicated programming agreements. These leadership positions also give us additional leverage to negotiate retransmission contracts with cable system operators, telephone video distributors, direct broadcast satellite (“DBS”) operators, and other multichannel video programming distributors (“MVPDs”).
We intend to maintain our market leadership position through continued prudent investment in our news and syndicated programs, as well as continued technological advances and workflow improvements. We expect to continue to invest in technological upgrades in the future. We believe the foregoing will help us maintain and grow our market leadership, thereby enhancing our ability to grow and further diversify our revenues and cash flows.
Continue to Pursue Strategic Growth and Accretive Acquisition Opportunities. Over the last several years, the television broadcasting industry has been characterized by a high level of acquisition activity. We believe that there are a number of television stations, and a few station groups, that have attractive operating profiles and characteristics, and that share our commitment to local news coverage in the communities in which they operate and to creating high-quality and locally-driven content. On a highly selective basis, we may pursue opportunities for the acquisition of additional television stations or station groups that fit our strategic and operational objectives, and where we believe that we can improve revenue, efficiencies and cash flow through active management and cost controls. As we consider potential acquisitions, we primarily evaluate potential station audience and revenue shares and the extent to which the acquisition target would positively impact our existing station operations. Consistent with this strategy, we have completed several acquisition and divestiture transactions, including some that had a material impact on our results of operations. For more information on these transactions, see Note 3 “Acquisitions and Divestitures” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. This note also describes the stations we acquired in each of 2020 and 2019, which we may also refer to collectively as our “acquisitions,” our “recent acquisitions” or “the acquisitions.”
Continue to Monetize Digital Spectrum. In addition to each station’s primary channel, we also broadcast a number of secondary channels. Certain secondary channels are simultaneously affiliated with more than one network. Our strategy includes expanding upon our digital offerings and sales. We continuously evaluate opportunities to use spectrum for future delivery of data to mobile devices using a new transmission standard.
Continue to Maintain Prudent Cost Management. Historically, we have closely managed costs to maintain and improve our margins. We believe that our market leadership position provides additional negotiating leverage that enables us to lower, on a relative basis, our syndicated programming costs. We have increased the efficiency of our stations by automating video production and back office processes. We believe that we will be able to further benefit from cost and operational efficiencies as we continue to grow.
Further Strengthen our Balance Sheet. During the last several years, we have leveraged our strong cash flow and efficient operating model to grow our diverse national footprint. In recent years, we acted to improve the terms of our debt by amending or replacing our long-term debt to secure favorable terms while interest rates are at historically low levels. During 2020, we issued additional fixed rate debt with extended maturity and used a portion of the proceeds to redeem fixed rate debt that was due to mature in 2024. During 2019, we completed the acquisition of all the equity interests of Raycom Media, Inc. (“Raycom”) and other related transactions (the “Raycom Merger”) using a financing plan composed of our cash on hand, common stock, preferred stock, attractively priced fixed rate debt and an amended term loan facility. We continually evaluate opportunities to improve our balance sheet. For more information regarding the Raycom Merger, see Note 3 “Acquisitions and Divestitures” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
Stations
The following table provides information about our television stations as of February 19, 2021:
| Primary | |||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
15 | Tampa-St. Pete (Sarasota), FL | WWSB | ABC | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
19 | Cleveland/Akron (Canton), OH | WOIO | CBS | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
19 | Cleveland/Akron (Canton), OH | WUAB | CW | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
23 | Charlotte, NC | WBTV | CBS | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
34 | Cincinnati, OH | WXIX | FOX | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
41 | West Palm Beach/Ft. Pierce, FL | WFLX | FOX | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
49 | Louisville, KY | WAVE | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
50 | Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL | WBRC | FOX | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
51 | New Orleans, LA | WVUE | FOX | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
52 | Memphis, TN | WMC | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
54 | Richmond/Petersburg, VA | WWBT | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
54 | Richmond/Petersburg, VA | WUPV | CW | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
60 | Knoxville, TN | WVLT | CBS | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
60 | Knoxville, TN | WBXX | CW | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
64 | Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, MI | WJRT | ABC | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
65 | Green Bay/Appleton, WI | WBAY | ABC | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
66 | Honolulu, HI | KHNL | NBC | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
66 | Honolulu, HI | KGMB | CBS | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
66 | (Hilo, HI) | KHBC | (d) | NBC/CBS | 2/1/2022 | |||||
66 | (Wailuku, HI) | KOGG | (d) | NBC/CBS | 2/1/2023 | |||||
66 | Honolulu, HI | KSIX | IND | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
67 | Lexington, KY | WKYT | CBS | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
67 | (Hazard, KY) | WYMT | (d) | CBS | 8/1/2021 | |||||
68 | Wichita/Hutchinson, KS | KWCH | CBS | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
68 | Wichita/Hutchinson, KS | KSCW | CW | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
68 | (Ensign, KS) | KBSD | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
68 | (Goodland, KS) | KBSL | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
68 | (Hays, KS) | KBSH | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
70 | Springfield, MO | KYTV | NBC | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
70 | Springfield, MO | KSPR | (e) | ABC | 2/1/2022 | |||||
70 | Springfield, MO | KYCW | (e) | CW | 2/1/2022 | |||||
72 | Omaha, NE | WOWT | NBC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
74 | Charleston/Huntington, WV | WSAZ | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
74 | Charleston/Huntington, WV | WQCW | CW | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
75 | Tucson (Sierra Vista), AZ | KOLD | CBS | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
76 | Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA | WDBJ | CBS | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
76 | Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA | WZBJ | (e) | MY | 10/1/2028 | |||||
78 | Toledo, OH | WTVG | ABC | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
79 | Columbia, SC | WIS | NBC | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
80 | Madison, WI | WMTV | NBC | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
81 | Huntsville/Decatur (Florence), AL | WAFF | NBC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
Our television stations, continued:
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
85 | Burlington, VT/Plattsburgh, NY | WCAX | CBS | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
85 | Burlington, VT/Plattsburgh, NY | WYCI | H&I | 6/1/2023 | ||||||
86 | Colorado Springs/Pueblo, CO | KKTV | CBS | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
87 | Savannah, GA | WTOC | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
88 | Charleston, SC | WCSC | CBS | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
89 | Myrtle Beach/Florence, SC | WMBF | NBC | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
91 | Paducah, KY/Cape Girardeau, MO/Harrisburg, IL | KFVS | CBS | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
91 | Paducah, KY/Cape Girardeau, MO/Harrisburg, IL | WQWQ | (e) | CW | 8/1/2021 | |||||
92 | Cedar Rapids/Waterloo/Iowa City/Dubuque, IA | KCRG | ABC | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
93 | Baton Rouge, LA | WAFB | CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
93 | Baton Rouge, LA | WBXH | (e) | MY | 6/1/2021 | |||||
94 | South Bend/Elkhart, IN | WNDU | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
95 | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | KWTX | CBS | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
95 | (Bryan, TX) | KBTX | (d) | CBS | 8/1/2022 | |||||
95 | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | KNCT | CW | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
96 | Shreveport, LA | KSLA | CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
97 | Jackson, MS | WLBT | NBC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
98 | Greenville/New Bern, NC/Washington, DC | WITN | NBC | 12/1/2020 | ||||||
101 | Davenport/Rock Island/Moline, IA | KWQC | NBC | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
106 | Boise, ID | KNIN | FOX | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
107 | Evansville, IN | WFIE | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
108 | Lansing, MI | WILX | NBC | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
109 | Reno, NV | KOLO | ABC | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
111 | Augusta, GA/Aiken, SC | WRDW | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
111 | Augusta, GA/Aiken, SC | WAGT | (e) | NBC | 4/1/2021 | |||||
112 | Tyler/Longview (Lufkin and Nacogdoches), TX | KLTV | ABC | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
112 | (Lufkin, TX) | KTRE | (d) | ABC | 8/1/2022 | |||||
113 | Tallahassee, FL/Thomasville, GA | WCTV | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
113 | Tallahassee, FL/Thomasville, GA | WFXU | (e) | ME | 4/1/2022 | |||||
114 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KOLN | CBS | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
114 | (Grand Island, NE) | KGIN | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
114 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KSNB | NBC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
114 | (Hastings, NE) | KNHL | ME/MY | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
114 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KCWH | (e) | CW | 6/1/2022 | |||||
115 | Sioux Falls/Mitchell, SD | KSFY | ABC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
115 | (Pierre, SD) | KPRY | (d) | ABC | 4/1/2022 | |||||
115 | Sioux Falls/Mitchell, SD | KDLT | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
115 | (Mitchell, SD) | KDLV | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
119 | Montgomery/Selma, AL | WSFA | NBC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
120 | Fargo/Valley City, ND | KVLY | NBC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
120 | Fargo/Valley City, ND | KXJB | (e) | CBS | 4/1/2022 | |||||
123 | La Crosse/Eau Claire, WI | WEAU | NBC | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
124 | Wilmington, NC | WECT | NBC | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
Our television stations, continued:
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
129 | Columbus, GA/Opelika, AL | WTVM | ABC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
132 | Rockford, IL | WIFR | (e) | CBS | 9/13/2021 | |||||
134 | Wausau/Rhinelander, WI | WSAW | CBS | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
134 | Wausau/Rhinelander, WI | WZAW | (e) | FOX | 12/1/2021 | |||||
137 | Amarillo, TX | KFDA | CBS | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
137 | (Clovis, NM) | KZBZ | (d) | CBS | 10/1/2022 | |||||
137 | Amarillo, TX | KEYU | TEL | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
139 | Panama City, FL | WJHG | NBC | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
139 | Panama City, FL | WECP | (e) | CBS | 2/1/2021 | |||||
140 | Topeka, KS | WIBW | CBS | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KCBD | NBC | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KLCW | CW | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KXTQ | (e) | TEL | 8/1/2022 | |||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KMYL | (e) | MY | 8/1/2022 | |||||
143 | Minot/Bismark/Dickinson/Williston, ND | KFYR | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
143 | (Minot, ND) | KMOT | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
143 | (Williston, ND) | KUMV | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
143 | (Dickinson, ND) | KQCD | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
145 | Monroe, LA/El Dorado, AR | KNOE | CBS/ABC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
148 | Anchorage, AK | KTUU | NBC | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
148 | Anchorage, AK | KYES | (e) | CBS | 2/1/2023 | |||||
150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KOSA | CBS | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
150 | (Big Springs) | KCWO | (d) | CW | 8/1/2022 | |||||
150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KWWT | MY | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KTLE | (e) | TEL | 8/1/2022 | |||||
151 | Bangor, ME | WABI | CBS | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
153 | Bikoxi/Gulfport, MS | WLOX | ABC/CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
154 | Wichita Falls, TX/Lawton, OK | KSWO | ABC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
154 | Wichita Falls, TX/Lawton, OK | KKTM | (e) | TEL | 6/1/2022 | |||||
160 | Gainesville, FL | WCJB | ABC | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
161 | Albany, GA | WALB | NBC/ABC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
161 | Albany, GA | WGCW | (e) | CW | 4/1/2021 | |||||
163 | Sherman/Ada, TX | KXII | CBS/FOX | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
168 | Hattiesburg/Laurel, MS | WDAM | NBC/ABC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
170 | Lake Charles, LA | KPLC | NBC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
171 | Harrisonburg, VA | WHSV | ABC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
171 | Harrisonburg, VA | WSVF | (e) | FOX/CBS | 10/1/2028 | |||||
173 | Rapid City, SD | KOTA | ABC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
173 | Rapid City, SD | KEVN | (e) | FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
173 | (Lead, SD) | KHSD | (d) | ABC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
173 | (Sheridan, WY) | KSGW | (d) | ABC | 10/1/2022 | |||||
Our television stations, continued:
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
174 | Watertown, NY | WWNY | CBS | 6/1/2023 | ||||||
174 | Watertown, NY | WNYF | (e) | FOX | 6/1/2023 | |||||
175 | Dothan, AL | WTVY | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
175 | Dothan, AL | WRGX | (e) | NBC | 4/1/2021 | |||||
176 | Clarksburg/Weston, WV | WDTV | CBS | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
176 | Clarksburg/Weston, WV | WVFX | FOX | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
177 | Marquette, MI | WLUC | NBC/FOX | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
179 | Bowling Green, KY | WBKO | ABC/FOX | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
180 | Alexandria, LA | KALB | NBC/CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
181 | Grand Junction/Montrose, CO | KKCO | NBC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
181 | Grand Junction/Montrose, CO | KJCT | (e) | ABC | 4/1/2022 | |||||
183 | Jonesboro, AR | KAIT | ABC/NBC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
185 | Laredo, TX | KGNS | NBC/ABC | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
185 | Laredo, TX | KYLX | (e) | CBS | 8/1/2022 | |||||
185 | Laredo, TX | KXNU | (e) | TEL | 8/1/2022 | |||||
189 | Charlottesville, VA | WVIR | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
190 | Meridian, MS | WTOK | ABC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
192 | Parkersburg, WV | WTAP | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
192 | Parkersburg, WV | WIYE | (e) | CBS | 10/1/2028 | |||||
192 | Parkersburg, WV | WOVA | (e) | FOX | 10/1/2028 | |||||
193 | Twin Falls, ID | KMVT | CBS | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
193 | Twin Falls, ID | KSVT | (e) | FOX | 10/1/2022 | |||||
195 | Cheyenne, WY/Scottsbluff, NE | KGWN | CBS | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
195 | (Scottsbluff, NE) | KSTF | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
195 | Cheyenne, WY/Scottsbluff, NE | KCHY | (e) | NBC | 10/1/2022 | |||||
198 | Mankato, MN | KEYC | CBS/FOX | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
198 | Mankato, MN | KMNF | (e) | NBC | 4/1/2022 | |||||
200 | Casper/Riverton, WY | KCWY | NBC | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
201 | Ottumwa, IA/Kirksville, MO | KYOU | NBC/FOX | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
203 | Fairbanks, AK | KXDF | CBS | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
203 | Fairbanks, AK | KTVF | (e) | NBC | 2/1/2023 | |||||
203 | Fairbanks, AK | KFXF | (e) | MY | 2/1/2023 | |||||
206 | Presque Isle, ME | WAGM | CBS/FOX | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
206 | Presque Isle, ME | WWPI | NBC | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
207 | Juneau, AK | KATH | NBC | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
207 | Juneau, AK | KYEX | (e) | CBS | 2/1/2023 | |||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KNOP | NBC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
209 | (Scottsbluff, NE) | KNEP | (d) | NBC | 6/1/2022 | |||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KNPL | (e) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KIIT | (e) | FOX | 6/1/2022 | |||||
(a) | DMA rank and names for the 2020-2021 television season based on information published by Comscore. |
(b) | Indicates primary network affiliations. All primary channels and nearly all of our secondary channels broadcast by the stations are affiliated with at least one broadcast network. |
(c) | Indicates expiration dates of primary FCC broadcast license. Under FCC rules, a station’s license term is extended past the stated expiration date during the FCC’s processing of a timely-filed license renewal application. We anticipate that all pending license renewal applications will be granted in due course. |
(d) | Station is a |
(e) | Station is a Class A or low-power television station. |
Cyclicality, Seasonality and Revenue Concentrations
Broadcast stations like ours rely on advertising revenue and are therefore sensitive to cyclical changes in the economy. Our political advertising revenue is generally not as significantly affected by economic slowdowns or recessions as non-political advertising revenue.
Broadcast advertising revenue is generally highest in the second and fourth quarters. This seasonality results partly from increases in consumer advertising in the spring and retail advertising in the period leading up to, and including, the Christmas holiday season. Broadcast advertising revenue is also typically higher in even-numbered years due to spending by political candidates, political parties and special interest groups during the “on year” of the two-year election cycle. Political advertising spending is typically heaviest during the fourth quarter. In addition, the broadcast of the Olympic Games by our NBC-affiliated stations generally leads to increased viewership and revenue during those years.
Our broadcast advertising revenue is earned from the sale of advertisements broadcast by our stations. Although no single customer represented more than 5% of our broadcast advertising revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 or 2018, we derived a material portion of our non-political broadcast advertising revenue from advertisers in a limited number of industries, particularly the automotive industry. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 approximately 21%, 25% and 25%, respectively, of our broadcast advertising revenue (excluding political advertising revenue) was obtained from advertising sales to automotive customers. Revenue from this industry may represent a higher percentage of total revenue in odd-numbered years due to, among other things, the increased availability of advertising time, as a result of such years being the “off year” of the two-year election cycle.
Station Network Affiliations. In addition to affiliations with ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX, our secondary channels are affiliated with numerous smaller networks and program services including, among others, the CW Network or the CW Plus Network (collectively, “CW”), MY Network, the MeTV Network, Justice, Circle, This TV Network, Antenna TV, Telemundo, Cozi, Heroes and Icons and MOVIES! Network. Certain of our secondary digital channels are affiliated with more than one network simultaneously. We also broadcast independent and local news/weather channels in some markets.
On January 1, 2020, Circle Media, LLC (“Circle”), a Nashville, Tennessee based joint venture between Opry Entertainment Group, a subsidiary of Ryman Hospitality Properties, and Gray launched a new country music and lifestyle television network on secondary channels of numerous television stations. Circle offers various content including entertainment news, documentaries, movies, archival, new and licensed programming, Grand Ole Opry performances, and more. Circle is currently broadcast on Gray television stations in approximately 75% of our markets as well as on stations in markets such as New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Atlanta, Nashville and many others through separate distribution agreements with CBS television stations, Meredith Corporation, and other broadcasters. Circle is also available on streaming platforms including Samsung TV Plus, The Roku Channel, Xumo, Redbox and Vizio.
The Big Four networks dominate broadcast television in terms of the amount of viewership that their original programming attracts. The “Big Three” major broadcast networks of CBS, NBC and ABC provide their respective network affiliates with a majority of the programming broadcast each day. FOX and CW provide their affiliates with a smaller portion of each day’s programming compared to the Big Three networks. The CW Plus Network generally provides programming for the entire broadcast day for CW affiliates in markets smaller than the top 100 DMAs.
We believe most successful commercial television stations obtain their brand identity from locally produced news programs; however, the affiliation of a station’s channels with one of the Big Four major networks can have a significant impact on the station’s programming, revenues, expenses and operations. A typical network provides an affiliate with network programming in exchange for a substantial majority of the advertising time available for sale during the airing of the network programs. The network then sells this advertising time and retains the revenue. The affiliate sells the remaining advertising time available within the network programming and non-network programming, and the affiliate retains most or all of these revenues. In seeking to acquire programming to supplement network-supplied programming, which we believe is critical to maximizing affiliate revenue, affiliates compete primarily with other affiliates and independent stations in their markets and, in certain cases, various national non-broadcast networks (“cable networks”) and various video streaming services that present competitive programming. The Big Four networks and CW charge fees to their affiliates for receiving network programming.
A television station may also acquire programming through barter arrangements. Under a programming barter arrangement, a national program distributor retains a fixed amount of advertising time within the program in exchange for the programming it supplies. The television station may pay a fixed fee for such programming.
We record revenue and expense for trade transactions involving the exchange of tangible goods or services with our customers. The revenue is recorded at the time the advertisement is broadcast and the expense is recorded at the time the goods or services are used. The revenue and expense associated with these transactions are based on the fair value of the assets or services received.
Affiliates of FOX and CW must purchase or produce a greater amount of programming for their non-network time periods, generally resulting in higher programming costs. However, affiliates of FOX and CW retain a larger portion of their advertising time inventory and the related revenues compared to Big Three affiliates.
Competition
Television stations compete for audiences, certain programming (including news) and advertisers. Cable network programming is a significant competitor of broadcast television programming. No single cable network regularly attains audience levels comparable to any major broadcast network. Despite increasing competition from cable channels, streaming services, digital platforms, social media, and internet-delivered video channels, television broadcasting remains the dominant distribution system for mass-market television advertising. In addition, signal coverage and carriage on MVPD systems materially affect a television station’s competitive position.
Audience. Stations compete for audience based on broadcast program popularity, which has a direct effect on advertising rates. Networks supply a substantial portion of our affiliated stations’ daily programming. Affiliated stations depend on the performance of the network programs to attract viewers. There can be no assurance that any such current or future programming created by our affiliated networks will achieve or maintain satisfactory viewership levels. Stations program non-network time periods with a combination of locally produced news, public affairs and entertainment programming, including national news or syndicated programs purchased for cash, cash and barter, or barter only.
MVPD systems have significantly altered the competitive landscape for audience in the television industry. Specifically, MVPD systems can increase a broadcasting station’s competition for viewers in a market by providing both cable networks and distant television station signals not otherwise available to the station’s audience.
Other sources of competition for audiences, programming and advertisers include streaming services, internet websites, mobile applications and wireless carriers, direct-to-consumer video distribution systems, and home entertainment systems.
Recent developments by many companies, including internet streaming service providers and internet website operators, have expanded, and are continuing to expand, the variety and quality of broadcast and non-broadcast video programming available to consumers via the internet. Internet companies have developed business relationships with companies that have traditionally provided syndicated programming, network television and other content. As a result, additional programming has, and is expected to further become, available through non-traditional methods, which can directly impact the number of TV viewers, and thus indirectly impact station rankings, popularity and revenue possibilities of our stations.
Programming. Competition for non-network programming involves negotiating with national program distributors, or syndicators, that sell “first run” and “off network” or rerun programming packages. Each station competes against the other broadcast stations in its market for exclusive access to first run programming (such as Wheel of Fortune) and off network reruns (such as Seinfeld). Broadcast stations also compete for exclusive news stories and features. Cable networks and internet service providers compete with local stations for programming.
Advertising. Advertising revenues comprise the primary source of revenues for our stations. Our stations compete for advertising revenues in their respective markets with other television stations, digital platforms including Google and Facebook, local cable and other MVPD systems, as well as local newspapers, radio stations, magazines, outdoor advertising, transit advertising, yellow page directories and direct mail.
Federal Regulation of the Television Broadcast Industry
General. Under the Communications Act of 1934 (“Communications Act”), television broadcast operations such as ours are subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC. Among other things, the Communications Act empowers the FCC to: (i) issue, revoke and modify broadcasting licenses; (ii) regulate stations’ operations and equipment; and (iii) impose penalties for violations of the Communications Act or FCC regulations. The Communications Act prohibits the assignment of a license or the transfer of control of a licensee without prior FCC approval.
License Grant and Renewal. The FCC grants broadcast licenses to television stations for terms of up to eight years. Broadcast licenses are of paramount importance to the operations of television stations. The Communications Act requires the FCC to renew a licensee’s broadcast license if the FCC finds that: (i) the station has served the public interest, convenience and necessity; (ii) there have been no serious violations of either the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules and regulations; and (iii) there have been no other violations which, taken together, would constitute a pattern of abuse. Historically the FCC has renewed broadcast licenses in substantially all cases. While we are not currently aware of any facts or circumstances that might prevent the renewal of our stations’ licenses at the end of their respective license terms, we cannot provide any assurances that any license will be renewed. Failure to renew any licenses upon the expiration of any license term could have a material adverse effect on our business. Under the Communications Act, the term of a broadcast license is automatically extended pending the FCC’s processing of a renewal application. For further information regarding the expiration dates of our stations’ current licenses and renewal application status, see the table under the heading “Stations”.
Media Ownership Restrictions and FCC Proceedings. The FCC’s broadcast ownership rules affect the number, type and location of broadcast properties that we may hold or acquire. The FCC adopted significant changes to its ownership rules, which took effect in February 2018. In November 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a mandate that vacated the FCC’s changes and reinstated the prior ownership rules. The Supreme Court of the United States granted the FCC’s petition for certiorari seeking review of the Third Circuit decision. The case was argued before the Supreme Court on January 19, 2021. The reinstated rules limit the common ownership, operation or control of, and “attributable” interests or voting power in: (i) television stations serving the same area; (ii) television stations and radio stations serving the same area; and (iii) daily newspapers and television or radio stations serving the same area. The rules also limit the aggregate national audience reach of television stations that may be under common ownership, operation and control, or in which a single person or entity may hold an official position or have more than a specified interest or percentage of voting power. The FCC’s rules also define the types of positions and interests that are considered attributable for purposes of the ownership limits, and thus also apply to our principals and certain investors.
The FCC is required by statute to review all of its broadcast ownership rules every four years to determine if such rules remain necessary in the public interest. In December 2018, the FCC began the new quadrennial review of its ownership rules. In its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”), the FCC is seeking comments on competition in the local television marketplace, including: (i) whether its current two-stations to a market limit should be relaxed or tightened; (ii) whether it should modify its general prohibition on owning two stations ranked among the top-four in a market; (iii) if the FCC’s television market analysis should consider the factors the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) applies to local television issues; and (iv) how the FCC should evaluate competition among television stations.
Local TV Ownership Rules. The FCC’s current television ownership rules allow one entity to own two commercial television stations in a DMA as long as the specified service contours of the stations do not overlap or, if they do, at least one of the stations is not ranked among the top four stations in the DMA and at least eight independently owned, full-power stations will remain in the DMA. Waivers of this rule may be available if at least one of the stations in a proposed combination qualifies, pursuant to specific criteria set forth in the FCC’s rules, as failed, failing, or unbuilt.
Cross-Media Limits. The newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule generally prohibits one entity from owning both a commercial broadcast station and a daily newspaper in the same community. The radio/television cross-ownership rule allows a party to own one or two TV stations and a varying number of radio stations within a single market.
National Television Station Ownership Rule. The maximum percentage of US households that a single owner can reach through commonly owned television stations is 39 percent. This limit was specified by Congress in 2004. The FCC applies a 50 percent “discount” for ultra-high frequency (“UHF”) stations. In December 2017, the FCC issued an NPRM seeking comment on whether it should modify or eliminate the national cap, including the UHF discount.
Conclusion. The FCC’s media ownership proceedings are on-going and, in many cases, are or will be subject to further judicial and potentially Congressional review. We cannot predict the outcome of any of these current or potential proceedings.
Attribution Rules. Under the FCC’s ownership rules, a direct or indirect purchaser of certain types of our securities could violate FCC regulations if that purchaser owned or acquired an “attributable” interest in other broadcast and daily newspaper properties in the same areas as one or more of our stations. Pursuant to FCC rules, the following relationships and interests are generally considered attributable for purposes of media ownership restrictions: (i) all officers and directors of a corporate licensee and its direct or indirect parent(s); (ii) voting stock interests of at least five percent; (iii) voting stock interests of at least 20 percent, if the holder is a passive institutional investor (such as an investment company, as defined in 15 U.S.C. 80a-3, bank, or insurance company); (iv) any equity interest in a limited partnership or limited liability company, unless properly “insulated” from management activities; (v) equity and/or debt interests that in the aggregate exceed 33 percent of a licensee’s total assets, if the interest holder supplies more than 15 percent of the station’s total weekly programming or is a same-market television broadcast company; and (vi) time brokerage of a television broadcast station by a same-market television broadcast company providing more than 15 percent of the station’s weekly programming.
Management services agreements and other types of shared services arrangements between same-market stations that do not include attributable time brokerage components generally are not deemed attributable under the FCC’s current rules and policies. However, the FCC previously requested comment on whether local news service agreements and/or shared services agreements should be considered attributable for purposes of applying the media ownership rules. The DOJ has taken steps under the antitrust laws to block certain transactions involving joint sales or other services agreements.
To our knowledge, no officer, director or five percent or greater shareholder currently holds an attributable interest in another television station that is inconsistent with the FCC’s ownership rules and policies or with our ownership of our stations.
Alien Ownership Restrictions. The Communications Act restricts the ability of foreign entities or individuals to own or hold interests in broadcast licenses. The Communications Act bars the following from holding broadcast licenses: foreign governments, representatives of foreign governments, non-citizens, representatives of non-citizens, and corporations or partnerships organized under the laws of a foreign nation. Foreign individuals or entities, collectively, may directly or indirectly own or vote no more than 20 percent of the capital stock of a licensee or 25 percent of the capital stock of a corporation that directly or indirectly controls a licensee. The 20 percent limit on foreign ownership of a licensee may not be waived. In September 2016, the Commission adopted an Order that allows broadcast licensees to use streamlined procedures when filing a petition for declaratory ruling seeking FCC approval to exceed the 25 percent foreign ownership benchmark for a parent company. The Commission also clarified the methodology for publicly traded broadcasters to assess compliance with the foreign ownership limits.
We serve as a holding company for our subsidiaries, including subsidiaries that hold station licenses. Therefore, absent a grant of a declaratory ruling, we may be restricted from having more than one-fourth of our stock owned or voted directly or indirectly by non-citizens, foreign governments, representatives of non-citizens or foreign governments, or foreign corporations.
Programming and Operations. Rules and policies of the FCC and other federal agencies regulate certain programming practices and other areas affecting the business or operations of broadcast stations.
The Children’s Television Act of 1990 limits commercial matter in children’s television programs and requires stations to present educational and informational children’s programming. Broadcasters are effectively required through license renewal processing guidelines to provide a certain amount of children’s educational programming per week on their primary channels. In July 2019, the FCC issued an Order that adopted sweeping changes to the current children’s programming rules giving broadcasters increased flexibility in how they choose to serve the educational and informational needs of children.
Over the past several years, the FCC has increased its enforcement efforts regarding broadcast indecency and profanity and the statutory maximum fine for broadcasting indecent material is currently $414,454 per incident. The FCC has sought comment on whether it should modify its indecency policies, but has not yet issued a decision in this proceeding. The outcome of this proceeding could affect future FCC policies in this area, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
EEO Rules. The FCC’s Equal Employment Opportunity (“EEO”) rules impose job information dissemination, recruitment, documentation and reporting requirements on broadcast station licensees. Broadcasters are subject to random audits to ensure compliance with EEO rules and may be sanctioned for noncompliance.
MVPD Retransmission of Local Television Signals. Under the Communications Act and FCC regulations, each television station generally has a so-called “must-carry” right to carriage of its primary channels on all MVPD systems serving their market. Each commercial television station may elect between invoking its “must carry” right or invoking a right to prevent an MVPD system from retransmitting the station’s signal without its consent (“retransmission consent”). Stations must make this election by October 1 every three years. Such elections are binding throughout the three-year cycle that commences on the subsequent January 1. The current election cycle commenced on January 1, 2021 and ends on December 31, 2023. During this period, our stations elected retransmission consent and have entered into retransmission consent contracts with virtually all MVPD systems serving their markets.
In accordance with STELAR, the FCC has promulgated rules that: (i) grant DBS providers the right to seek market modifications based on factors similar to those used in the cable industry; (ii) broaden the FCC’s prohibition against joint retransmission negotiations by prohibiting joint retransmission negotiations by any stations in the same DMA not under common control; (iii) prohibit a television station from limiting the ability of an MVPD to carry into its local market television signals that are deemed significantly viewed; and (iv) eliminate the “sweeps prohibition,” which precluded cable operators from deleting or repositioning local commercial television stations during “sweeps” ratings periods.
We currently are not a party to any agreements that delegate our authority to negotiate retransmission consent for any of our television stations or that grant us authority to negotiate retransmission consent for any other television station. Nevertheless, we cannot predict how the FCC’s restriction on joint negotiation might impact future opportunities.
The FCC has sought comment on whether it should modify or eliminate the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules. In March 2020, the FCC sought comment on whether it should modernize its methodology for determining whether a television station is significantly viewed in a community outside of its local television market. Under exceptions to the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules, cable operators and satellite carriers are not required to delete the duplicating network or syndicated programming where the signal of the otherwise distant station is determined to be significantly viewed in the relevant community. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings. If, however, the FCC eliminates or relaxes its rules enforcing our program exclusivity rights, it could affect our ability to negotiate future retransmission consent agreements, and it could harm our ratings and advertising revenue if cable and satellite operators import duplicative programming.
Certain online video distributors (“OVDs”) have explored streaming broadcast programming over the internet without the consent of the copyright owner of the programming. The majority of federal courts have sided with broadcasters and enjoined OVDs from streaming broadcast programming. Recently, a new OVD, organized as a non-profit, began offering free access to broadcast programming in select cities over the Internet. This OVD argues that its retransmission of broadcast signals via the internet is covered by an exemption from copyright liability applicable to non-profit entities. In July 2019, the major broadcast networks and certain affiliated entities filed a copyright suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York challenging this OVD’s operations. That suit remains pending and the OVD has continued its operations.
On December 19, 2014, the FCC issued an NPRM seeking comment on its proposal to modernize the term “MVPD” to be technology neutral. If the NPRM proposal is adopted, an entity that uses the internet to distribute multiple streams of linear programming would be considered an MVPD and would have the same retransmission consent rights and obligations as other MVPDs, including the right to negotiate with television stations to carry their broadcast signals. The FCC also asked about the possible copyright implications of this proposal. We cannot predict the outcome of the FCC’s interpretive proceedings.
In December 2019, the Satellite Television Community Protection and Promotion Act of 2019 and the Television Viewer Protection Act of 2019 (the “TVPA of 2019”) were signed into law. Among other things, these acts (i) made permanent the copyright license set out in Section 119 of the Copyright Act; (ii) limited eligibility for use of the Section 119 license to retransmit the signals of network television broadcast stations to unserved households to those satellite operators who provide local-into-local service to all DMAs; and (iii) modified the definition of unserved households to those households located in a “short market” (which, in turn, was defined as a local market in which programming of one or more of the top four networks is not offered on either the primary or multicast stream by any network station in that market). The TVPA of 2019 also made permanent the requirement that broadcasters and MVPDs negotiate in good faith and adds a provision that (i) allows MVPDs to designate a buying group to negotiate retransmission consent agreements on their behalf and (ii) requires large stations groups, such as us, to negotiate in good faith with a qualified MVPD buying group. The rules that the FCC promulgated to implement those provisions of the TVPA of 2019 became effective in July 2020.
In December 2020, we filed a good faith negotiation complaint against Citizens Telecom Services Company, LLC d/b/a Frontier Communications (“Frontier”) stating that Frontier violated its duty to negotiate in good faith concerning the carriage of WWSB(TV), Sarasota, Florida, WCSC-TV, Charleston, South Carolina, and WMBF-TV, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The stations currently are not being carried on the Frontier systems, and the proceeding remains pending at the FCC.
The Incentive Auction concluded in 2017 requiring the FCC to reallocate 84 MHz of spectrum to new users. As part of this reallocation process, certain television stations that did not sell their spectrum in the reverse auction were required to change channels and modify their transmission facilities (the “Repack”). The FCC was required to use “reasonable efforts” to preserve a station’s coverage area and population served and cannot require a station to involuntarily move from the UHF band to the VHF band or from the high VHF band to the low VHF band. These changes may constrain our ability to provide high definition programming and additional program streams, including mobile video services. The underlying legislation authorizes the FCC to reimburse stations for reasonable relocation costs. In March 2018, Congress adopted the Reimbursement Expansion Act (“REA”) to expand the list of entities eligible to be reimbursed for Repack expenses to include LPTV and TV translator stations. The REA also increased the funds available to reimburse full power and Class A stations. The FCC protected only full power and Class A television stations during the Repack. In certain markets, our low power television stations were displaced by this process requiring us to locate alternate channels for ongoing operations.
We cannot predict the likelihood, timing or outcome of any court, Congressional or FCC regulatory action with respect to the repacking of broadcast television spectrum, nor the impact of any such changes upon our business.
The foregoing does not purport to be a complete summary of the Communications Act, other applicable statutes, or the FCC’s rules, regulations or policies. Proposals for additional or revised regulations and requirements are pending before, are being considered by, and may in the future be considered by, Congress and federal regulatory agencies from time to time. We cannot predict the effect of any existing or proposed federal legislation, regulations or policies on our business. Also, several of the foregoing matters are now, or may become, the subject of litigation, and we cannot predict the outcome of any such litigation or the effect on our business.
Human Capital
Successful execution of our strategy is dependent on attracting, developing and retaining key employees and members of our management team. We believe the substantial skills, experience and industry knowledge of our employees and our training of our customer-facing employees benefit our operations and performance. There are several ways in which we attract, develop, and retain highly qualified talent, including:
● | Training and investing in our employees. With competitive wages, healthcare benefits, a defined contribution retirement program and opportunities for job training and advancement, our employees develop skills and expertise necessary to |
● | Driving a diverse and inclusive culture. We are committed to diversity and inclusion in every aspect of our business. As we strive to deliver high-quality products and services that exceed expectations, we embrace the
We believe that diversity, equity and inclusion are principles that drive innovation and should guide us as we build our teams. We have In the summer of
We are building on the training from 2020 with pilot programs to continue training and identifying more opportunities for growth. With the support and feedback of these pilot teams, we hope to outline strategies to continue the transformation of our workplace culture. We are listening to the feedback from the pilot program teams and employees in general on these important topics. We continue to encourage and support feedback from all our employees. |
● | Focusing on a safe and healthy workplace.We value our employees and are committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace. All employees are required to comply with
|
Employees
As of February 19, 2021, we had 7,017 full-time employees and 245 part-time employees, of which 225 full-time and six part-time employees at eight stations were represented by various unions. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Cybersecurityriskscouldaffectouroperatingeffectiveness.
We use computers in substantially all aspects of our business operations. Our revenues are increasingly dependent on digital products. Such use exposes us to potential cyber incidents resulting from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. These incidents could include, but are not limited to, unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, data corruption or operational disruption. The results of these incidents could include, but are not limited to, business interruption, disclosure of nonpublic information, decreased advertising revenues, misstated financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection costs, litigation, financial consequences and reputational damage adversely affecting customer or investor confidence, any or all of which could adversely affect our business. Although we have systems and processes in place to protect against risks associated with cyber incidents, depending on the nature of an incident, these protections may not be fully sufficient.
Certainstockholdersorgroupsofstockholdershavetheabilitytoexertsignificantinfluenceoverus.
Hilton H. Howell, Jr., our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, is the husband of Robin R. Howell, a member of our Board of Directors (collectively with other members of their family, the “Howell-Robinson Family”). As of February 23, 2018, the Howell-Robinson Family directly or indirectly beneficially owned shares representing approximately 39% of the outstanding combined voting power of our common stock and Class A common stock.
As a result of these significant stockholdings and positions on the Board of Directors, the Howell-Robinson Family is able to exert significant influence over our policies and management, potentially in a manner which may not be consistent with the interests of our other stockholders.
Weareaholdingcompanywithnomaterialindependentassetsoroperationsandwedependonoursubsidiariesforcash.
We are a holding company with no material independent assets or operations, other than our investments in our subsidiaries. Because we are a holding company, we are dependent upon the payment of dividends, distributions, loans or advances to us by our subsidiaries to fund our obligations. These payments could be or become subject to dividend or other restrictions under applicable laws in the jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate. Payments by our subsidiaries are also contingent upon the subsidiaries’ earnings. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funds from our subsidiaries to fund our obligations, our financial condition and ability to meet our obligations may be adversely affected.
RisksRelatedtoRegulatoryMatters
Federal broadcasting industry regulations limit our operating flexibility.
The FCC regulates all television broadcasters, including us. We must obtain FCC approval whenever we (i) apply for a new license, (ii) seek to renew, modify or assign a license, (iii) purchase a broadcast station and/or (iv) transfer the control of one of our subsidiaries that holds a license. Our FCC licenses are critical to our operations, and we cannot operate without them. We cannot be certain that the FCC will renew these licenses in the future or approve new acquisitions, mergers, divestitures or other business activities. Our failure to renew any licenses upon the expiration of any license term could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Federal legislation and FCC rules have changed significantly in recent years and may continue to change. These changes may limit our ability to conduct our business in ways that we believe would be advantageous and may affect our operating results.
The FCC can sanction us for programming broadcast on our stations that it finds to be indecent.
Over the past several years, the FCC has increased its enforcement efforts regarding broadcast indecency and profanity and the statutory maximum fine for broadcasting indecent material is currently $325,000 per incident. In June 2012, the Supreme Court decided a challenge to the FCC’s indecency enforcement without resolving the scope of the FCC’s ability to regulate broadcast content. In August 2013, the FCC issued a Public Notice seeking comment on whether it should modify its indecency policies. The FCC has not yet issued a decision in this proceeding and the courts remain free to review the FCC’s current policy or any modifications thereto. The outcomes of these proceedings could affect future FCC policies in this area, and we are unable to predict the outcome of any such judicial proceeding, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The FCC’s duopoly restrictions limit our ability to own and operate multiple television stations in the same market.
The FCC’s ownership rules generally prohibit us from owning or having “attributable interests” in two television stations that are located in the same markets in which our stations are licensed and at least one station is ranked among the top-four stations in the market (the “Top Four Prohibition”). In November 2017, the FCC released an Order that eliminated or relaxed several long-standing media ownership rules. The Order (i) eliminated the newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule, (ii) eliminated the radio/television cross-ownership rule, (iii) loosened the existing rules governing ownership of local television stations by agreeing to consider requests for waivers of the Top Four Prohibition on a case-by-case basis, and (iv) reversed the FCC’s earlier decision to treat joint sales agreements (“JSAs”) as attributable ownership interests. The FCC also considers television Local Marketing Agreements (“LMAs”) (which are agreements under which a television station sells or provides more than 15 percent of the programming on another same-market television station) as “attributable interests.” While the ownership rules have been relaxed, these rules still constrain our ability to expand in our present markets through additional station acquisitions or LMAs.
The FCC’s National Television Station Ownership Rule limits the maximum number of households we can reach.
Under the FCC’s National Television Station Ownership Rule, a single television station owner may not reach more than 39 percent of U.S. households through commonly owned television stations, subject to a 50 percent discount of the number of television households attributable to UHF stations (the “UHF Discount”). In December 2017, the Commission issued a notice of proposed rulemaking seeking comment on whether it should modify or eliminate the national cap, including the UHF Discount. This rule may constrain our ability to expand through additional station acquisitions.
Risks Related to the Ownership of Our Equity Securities
The price and trading volume of our equity securities may be volatile.
The price and trading volume of our equity securities may be volatile and subject to fluctuations. Some of the factors that could cause fluctuation in the stock price or trading volume of our equity securities include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There can be no assurance that the price of our equity securities will not fluctuate or decline significantly. The stock market in recent years has experienced considerable price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of individual companies and that could adversely affect the price of our equity securities, regardless of our operating performance. Stock price volatility might be worse if the trading volume of shares of our equity securities is low. Furthermore, stockholders may initiate securities class action lawsuits if the market price of our equity securities were to decline significantly, which may cause us to incur substantial costs and could divert the time and attention of our management.
We do not currently pay cash dividends on our common stock or Class A common stock. To the extent a potential investor ascribes value to a dividend paying stock, the value of our stock may be correspondingly reduced.
Our Board of Directors has not declared a cash or stock dividend on either class of our common stock since 2008. The timing and amount of any future dividend is at the discretion of our Board of Directors, and they may be subject to limitations or restrictions in our senior credit facility and other financing agreements we may be, or become, party to. We can provide no assurance when or if any future dividends will be declared on our common stock or Class A common stock.
As a result, if and to the extent an investor ascribes value to a dividend-paying stock, the value of our common stock or Class A common stock may be correspondingly reduced.
Additional issuances of equity securities would dilute the ownership of our existing stockholders and could reduce our earnings per share.
We may issue additional equity securities in the future in connection with capital raises, acquisitions, strategic transactions or for other purposes. To the extent we issue substantial additional equity securities, the ownership of our existing stockholders would be diluted and our earnings per share could be reduced.
Anti-takeover provisions contained in our Restated Articles of Incorporation (“Articles”) and our Bylaws, as amended (“Bylaws”), as well as provisions of Georgia law, could impair a takeover attempt.
Our Articles and Bylaws may have the effect of delaying, deferring or discouraging a prospective acquirer from making a tender offer for our shares of common stock or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us. To the extent that these provisions discourage takeover attempts, they could deprive stockholders of opportunities to realize takeover premiums for their shares. Moreover, these provisions could discourage accumulations of large blocks of common stock, thus depriving stockholders of any advantages which large accumulations of stock might provide.
As a Georgia corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Georgia law, including Section 14-2-1132 of the Georgia Business Corporation Code. Section 14-2-1132 prevents some stockholders holding more than 10% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations unless the business combination was approved in advance by our Board of Directors or results in the stockholder holding more than 90% of our outstanding common stock.
Any provision of our Articles, our Bylaws or Georgia law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
We have the ability to issue preferred stock, which could affect the rights of holders of our common stock and Class A common stock.
Our Articles allow our Board of Directors to issue up to 20 million shares of preferred stock and set forth the terms of such preferred stock. The terms of any such preferred stock, if issued, may adversely affect the dividend and liquidation rights of holders of our common stock.
Holders of our Class A common stock have the right to 10 votes per share on all matters to be voted on by our stockholders and, consequently, the ability to exert significant influence over us.
As a result of the 10 to 1 voting rights of holders of our Class A common stock, these stockholders are expected to be able to exert significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including mergers and other material transactions, and may be able to cause or prevent a change in the composition of our Board of Directors or a change in control of our Company that could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of the Company and might ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.
If securities analysts do not continue to publish research or reports about our business, or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock could decline.
We expect that the trading price of our equity securities may be affected by research or reports that industry or financial analysts publish about our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade their evaluations, the price of our equity securities could decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our Company, we could lose visibility in the market for our equity securities, which in turn could cause our stock prices to decline.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
We lease our principal executive offices in a building located at 4370 Peachtree Road, NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30319. We also lease various other offices that support our operations. See “Business – Stations” elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a listing of our significant television stations and their locations.
The types of properties required to support television stations include offices, studios, transmitter sites and antenna sites. A station’s studios are generally housed within its offices in each respective market. The transmitter sites and antenna sites are generally located in elevated areas to provide optimal signal strength and coverage. We own or lease land, offices, studios, transmitters and antennas in each of our markets necessary to support our operations in that market area. In some market areas, we also own or lease multiple properties, such as towers and/or signal repeaters (translators), to optimize our broadcast capabilities. To the extent that our properties are leased and those leases contain expiration dates, we believe that those leases can be renewed, or that alternative facilities can be leased or acquired, on terms that are comparable, in all material respects, to our existing properties.
We generally believe all of our owned and leased properties are in good condition, and suitable for the conduct of our present business.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are, from time to time, subject to legal proceedings and claims in the normal course of our business. Based on our current knowledge, we do not believe that any known legal proceedings or claims are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Executive Officers of the Registrant.
Set forth below is certain information with respect to our executive officers as of February 23, 2018:
Hilton H. Howell, Jr., age 55, has served as our Chief Executive Officer since August 2008 and has also served as our President since June 2013. Mr. Howell, who is a member of the Executive Committee of the Board, has been a director since 1993 and served as the Vice Chairman of the Board from 2002 until April 2016 when he was appointed as Chairman. He served as our Executive Vice President from September 2002 to August 2008. He has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic American Corporation, an insurance holding company, since 1995, and as Chairman of that company since February 2009. He has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire & Casualty Insurance Company since 1991. Mr. Howell also serves as a director of Atlantic American Corporation and of each of its subsidiaries, American Southern Insurance Company, American Safety Insurance Company and Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company, as well as a director of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. He is the husband of Mrs. Robin R. Howell, who is a member of our Board of Directors.
James C. Ryan, age 57, has served as our Chief Financial Officer since October 1998 and as Executive Vice President since February 2016. Before that, he had been our Senior Vice President since September 2002 and our Vice President since October 1998.
Kevin P. Latek, age 47, has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Legal and Development Officer since February 2016. Before that, he served as our Senior Vice President, Business Affairs, since July 2013 and as our Vice President for Law and Development since March 2012. Prior to joining us, Mr. Latek represented television and radio broadcasters as well as financial institutions in FCC regulatory and transactional matters with the law firm of Dow Lohnes, PLLC, in Washington, DC. He is a member of the National Association of Broadcasters Educational Foundation, the CBS Affiliates Board, the American Bar Association and the Federal Communications Bar Association. He is a past member of the FOX Affiliates Board of Governors.
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’sRegistrant’s Common Equity,Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.Securities
34
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
38
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
39
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
51
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
53
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
104
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
104
Item 9B.
Other Information
105
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
105
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
105
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
106
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
107
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
107
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
107
Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
111
Signatures
112
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report on Form 10-K contains and incorporates by reference “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than those of historical fact. When used in this annual report, the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “will,” “may,” “should” and similar words and expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our then-current expectations and are based upon data available to us at the time the statements are made. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things, statements about the evolving and uncertain nature of novel coronavirus and its related disease (“COVID-19”) global pandemicand its impact on us, the media industry, and the economy in general, our strategies, expected results of operations, general and industry-specific economic conditions, future pension plan contributions, future capital expenditures, future income tax payments, future payments of interest and principal on our long-term debt, assumptions underlying various estimates and estimates of future obligations and commitments, and should be considered in context with the various other disclosures made by us about our business. Readers are cautioned that any forward-looking statements, including those regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of our management, are not guarantees of future performance, results or events and involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results and events may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including, but not limited to, those listed in Item 1A. of this Annual Report and the other factors described from time to time in our SEC filings. The forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
In this annual report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the words “Gray,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Gray Television, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Unless otherwise indicated, all station rank, in-market share and television household data herein are derived from reports prepared by Comscore, Inc. (“Comscore”). While we believe this data to be accurate and reliable, we have not independently verified such data nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein and cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such data.
General
We are a television broadcast company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, that is the largest owner of top-rated local television (“television” or “TV”) stations and digital assets in the United States (“US”). We currently own and/or operate television stations and leading digital properties in 94 television markets that collectively reach approximately 24% of US television households. During 2020, our stations were ranked first in average all-day ratings in 70 markets, and ranked first and/or second in 86 markets, as calculated by Comscore’s audience measurement service. We also own video program production, marketing, and digital businesses including Raycom Sports, Tupelo-Raycom, and RTM Studios, the producer of PowerNation programs and content, which we refer to collectively as our “production companies.”
Our operating revenues are derived primarily from broadcast and internet advertising and from retransmission consent fees. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 our total revenue was $2.4 billion, $2.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
Markets and Stations
We believe a key driver for our strong market position is our focus on strong local news and information programming. We believe that our market position and our strong local teams have enabled us to maintain more stable revenues compared to many of our peers.
We are diversified across our markets and network affiliations. In 2020 and 2019, our largest markets, by revenue, were Charlotte, North Carolina and Cleveland-Akron, Ohio which each contributed approximately 4% of our revenue in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Our top 10 markets by revenue contributed approximately 24% of our total revenue in each of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2020, our CBS-affiliated channels accounted for approximately 36% of total revenue; our NBC-affiliated channels accounted for approximately 32% of total revenue; our ABC-affiliated channels accounted for approximately 14% of total revenue; and our FOX-affiliated channels accounted for approximately 10% of total revenue. We refer to CBS, NBC, ABC and FOX as the “Big Four” networks.
In each of our markets, we own and operate at least one television station broadcasting a primary channel affiliated with one of the Big Four networks. We also own additional stations in some markets, some of which also broadcast primary channels affiliated with one of the Big Four networks. Nearly all of our stations broadcast secondary digital channels that are affiliated with various networks or are independent of any network. The terms of our affiliations with broadcast networks are governed by network affiliation agreements. Each network affiliation agreement provides the affiliated station with the right to broadcast all programs transmitted by the affiliated network. Our network affiliation agreements with the Big Four broadcast networks currently expire at various dates through December 2023.
Television Industry Background
The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) grants broadcast licenses to television stations. There are only a limited number of broadcast licenses available in any one geographic area. Each commercial television station in the US is assigned to one of 210 designated market areas (“DMAs”). These markets are ranked in size according to their number of television households, with the market having the largest number of television households ranked number one (New York City). Each DMA is an exclusive geographic area consisting of all counties (and in some cases, portions of counties) in which the home-market commercial television stations receive the greatest percentage of total viewing hours.
Television station revenue is derived primarily from local, regional and national advertising revenue and retransmission consent fees. Television station revenue is also derived to a much lesser extent from studio and tower space rental fees and production activities. “Advertising” primarily refers to advertisements broadcast by television stations, but it also includes advertisements placed on a television station’s website and sponsorships of television programming and off-line content such as email messages, mobile applications, and other electronic content distributed by stations. Advertising rates are typically driven by: (i) the size of a station’s market; (ii) a station’s overall ratings; (iii) a program’s popularity among targeted viewers; (iv) the number of advertisers competing for available time; (v) the demographic makeup of the station’s market; (vi) the availability of alternative advertising media in the market; (vii) the presence of effective sales forces; and (viii) the development of projects, features and programs that tie advertiser messages to programming and/or digital content on a station’s website or mobile applications. Advertising rates can also be determined in part by the station’s ratings and market share among particular demographic groups that an advertiser may be targeting.
Because broadcast stations rely on advertising revenues, they are sensitive to cyclical changes in the economy. The sizes of advertisers’ budgets, which can be affected by broad economic trends, can affect the broadcast industry in general and the revenues of individual broadcast television stations.
Strategy
Our success is based on the following strategies:
Grow by Leveraging our Diverse National Footprint. We serve a diverse and national footprint of television stations. We currently operate in DMAs ranked between 15 and 209. We operate in many markets that we believe have the potential for significant political advertising revenue in periods leading up to elections. We are also diversified across our broadcast programming.
Maintain and Grow our Market Leadership Position. According to Comscore, during 2020, our owned and operated television stations achieved the #1 ranking in overall audience in 70 of our 94 markets. In addition, our stations achieved the #1 and/or #2 ranking in overall audience in 86 of our 94 markets.
We believe there are significant advantages in operating the #1 or #2 television broadcasting stations in a local market. Strong audience and market share allow us to enhance our advertising revenue through price discipline and leadership. We believe a top-rated news platform is critical to capturing incremental sponsorship and political advertising revenue. Our high-quality station group allows us to generate higher operating margins, which allows us additional opportunities to reinvest in our business to further strengthen our network and news ratings. Furthermore, we believe operating the top ranked stations in our various markets allows us to attract and retain top talent.
We also believe that our local market leadership positions help us in negotiating more beneficial terms in our major network affiliation agreements, which currently expire at various dates through December 2023, and in our syndicated programming agreements. These leadership positions also give us additional leverage to negotiate retransmission contracts with cable system operators, telephone video distributors, direct broadcast satellite (“DBS”) operators, and other multichannel video programming distributors (“MVPDs”).
We intend to maintain our market leadership position through continued prudent investment in our news and syndicated programs, as well as continued technological advances and workflow improvements. We expect to continue to invest in technological upgrades in the future. We believe the foregoing will help us maintain and grow our market leadership, thereby enhancing our ability to grow and further diversify our revenues and cash flows.
Continue to Pursue Strategic Growth and Accretive Acquisition Opportunities. Over the last several years, the television broadcasting industry has been characterized by a high level of acquisition activity. We believe that there are a number of television stations, and a few station groups, that have attractive operating profiles and characteristics, and that share our commitment to local news coverage in the communities in which they operate and to creating high-quality and locally-driven content. On a highly selective basis, we may pursue opportunities for the acquisition of additional television stations or station groups that fit our strategic and operational objectives, and where we believe that we can improve revenue, efficiencies and cash flow through active management and cost controls. As we consider potential acquisitions, we primarily evaluate potential station audience and revenue shares and the extent to which the acquisition target would positively impact our existing station operations. Consistent with this strategy, we have completed several acquisition and divestiture transactions, including some that had a material impact on our results of operations. For more information on these transactions, see Note 3 “Acquisitions and Divestitures” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. This note also describes the stations we acquired in each of 2020 and 2019, which we may also refer to collectively as our “acquisitions,” our “recent acquisitions” or “the acquisitions.”
Continue to Monetize Digital Spectrum. In addition to each station’s primary channel, we also broadcast a number of secondary channels. Certain secondary channels are simultaneously affiliated with more than one network. Our strategy includes expanding upon our digital offerings and sales. We continuously evaluate opportunities to use spectrum for future delivery of data to mobile devices using a new transmission standard.
Continue to Maintain Prudent Cost Management. Historically, we have closely managed costs to maintain and improve our margins. We believe that our market leadership position provides additional negotiating leverage that enables us to lower, on a relative basis, our syndicated programming costs. We have increased the efficiency of our stations by automating video production and back office processes. We believe that we will be able to further benefit from cost and operational efficiencies as we continue to grow.
Further Strengthen our Balance Sheet. During the last several years, we have leveraged our strong cash flow and efficient operating model to grow our diverse national footprint. In recent years, we acted to improve the terms of our debt by amending or replacing our long-term debt to secure favorable terms while interest rates are at historically low levels. During 2020, we issued additional fixed rate debt with extended maturity and used a portion of the proceeds to redeem fixed rate debt that was due to mature in 2024. During 2019, we completed the acquisition of all the equity interests of Raycom Media, Inc. (“Raycom”) and other related transactions (the “Raycom Merger”) using a financing plan composed of our cash on hand, common stock, preferred stock, attractively priced fixed rate debt and an amended term loan facility. We continually evaluate opportunities to improve our balance sheet. For more information regarding the Raycom Merger, see Note 3 “Acquisitions and Divestitures” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
Stations
The following table provides information about our television stations as of February 19, 2021:
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
15 | Tampa-St. Pete (Sarasota), FL | WWSB | ABC | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
19 | Cleveland/Akron (Canton), OH | WOIO | CBS | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
19 | Cleveland/Akron (Canton), OH | WUAB | CW | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
23 | Charlotte, NC | WBTV | CBS | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
34 | Cincinnati, OH | WXIX | FOX | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
41 | West Palm Beach/Ft. Pierce, FL | WFLX | FOX | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
49 | Louisville, KY | WAVE | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
50 | Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL | WBRC | FOX | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
51 | New Orleans, LA | WVUE | FOX | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
52 | Memphis, TN | WMC | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
54 | Richmond/Petersburg, VA | WWBT | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
54 | Richmond/Petersburg, VA | WUPV | CW | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
60 | Knoxville, TN | WVLT | CBS | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
60 | Knoxville, TN | WBXX | CW | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
64 | Flint/Saginaw/Bay City, MI | WJRT | ABC | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
65 | Green Bay/Appleton, WI | WBAY | ABC | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
66 | Honolulu, HI | KHNL | NBC | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
66 | Honolulu, HI | KGMB | CBS | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
66 | (Hilo, HI) | KHBC | (d) | NBC/CBS | 2/1/2022 | |||||
66 | (Wailuku, HI) | KOGG | (d) | NBC/CBS | 2/1/2023 | |||||
66 | Honolulu, HI | KSIX | IND | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
67 | Lexington, KY | WKYT | CBS | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
67 | (Hazard, KY) | WYMT | (d) | CBS | 8/1/2021 | |||||
68 | Wichita/Hutchinson, KS | KWCH | CBS | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
68 | Wichita/Hutchinson, KS | KSCW | CW | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
68 | (Ensign, KS) | KBSD | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
68 | (Goodland, KS) | KBSL | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
68 | (Hays, KS) | KBSH | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
70 | Springfield, MO | KYTV | NBC | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
70 | Springfield, MO | KSPR | (e) | ABC | 2/1/2022 | |||||
70 | Springfield, MO | KYCW | (e) | CW | 2/1/2022 | |||||
72 | Omaha, NE | WOWT | NBC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
74 | Charleston/Huntington, WV | WSAZ | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
74 | Charleston/Huntington, WV | WQCW | CW | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
75 | Tucson (Sierra Vista), AZ | KOLD | CBS | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
76 | Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA | WDBJ | CBS | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
76 | Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA | WZBJ | (e) | MY | 10/1/2028 | |||||
78 | Toledo, OH | WTVG | ABC | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
79 | Columbia, SC | WIS | NBC | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
80 | Madison, WI | WMTV | NBC | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
81 | Huntsville/Decatur (Florence), AL | WAFF | NBC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
Our television stations, continued:
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
85 | Burlington, VT/Plattsburgh, NY | WCAX | CBS | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
85 | Burlington, VT/Plattsburgh, NY | WYCI | H&I | 6/1/2023 | ||||||
86 | Colorado Springs/Pueblo, CO | KKTV | CBS | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
87 | Savannah, GA | WTOC | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
88 | Charleston, SC | WCSC | CBS | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
89 | Myrtle Beach/Florence, SC | WMBF | NBC | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
91 | Paducah, KY/Cape Girardeau, MO/Harrisburg, IL | KFVS | CBS | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
91 | Paducah, KY/Cape Girardeau, MO/Harrisburg, IL | WQWQ | (e) | CW | 8/1/2021 | |||||
92 | Cedar Rapids/Waterloo/Iowa City/Dubuque, IA | KCRG | ABC | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
93 | Baton Rouge, LA | WAFB | CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
93 | Baton Rouge, LA | WBXH | (e) | MY | 6/1/2021 | |||||
94 | South Bend/Elkhart, IN | WNDU | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
95 | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | KWTX | CBS | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
95 | (Bryan, TX) | KBTX | (d) | CBS | 8/1/2022 | |||||
95 | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | KNCT | CW | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
96 | Shreveport, LA | KSLA | CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
97 | Jackson, MS | WLBT | NBC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
98 | Greenville/New Bern, NC/Washington, DC | WITN | NBC | 12/1/2020 | ||||||
101 | Davenport/Rock Island/Moline, IA | KWQC | NBC | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
106 | Boise, ID | KNIN | FOX | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
107 | Evansville, IN | WFIE | NBC | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
108 | Lansing, MI | WILX | NBC | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
109 | Reno, NV | KOLO | ABC | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
111 | Augusta, GA/Aiken, SC | WRDW | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
111 | Augusta, GA/Aiken, SC | WAGT | (e) | NBC | 4/1/2021 | |||||
112 | Tyler/Longview (Lufkin and Nacogdoches), TX | KLTV | ABC | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
112 | (Lufkin, TX) | KTRE | (d) | ABC | 8/1/2022 | |||||
113 | Tallahassee, FL/Thomasville, GA | WCTV | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
113 | Tallahassee, FL/Thomasville, GA | WFXU | (e) | ME | 4/1/2022 | |||||
114 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KOLN | CBS | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
114 | (Grand Island, NE) | KGIN | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
114 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KSNB | NBC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
114 | (Hastings, NE) | KNHL | ME/MY | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
114 | Lincoln/Hastings/Kearney, NE | KCWH | (e) | CW | 6/1/2022 | |||||
115 | Sioux Falls/Mitchell, SD | KSFY | ABC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
115 | (Pierre, SD) | KPRY | (d) | ABC | 4/1/2022 | |||||
115 | Sioux Falls/Mitchell, SD | KDLT | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
115 | (Mitchell, SD) | KDLV | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
119 | Montgomery/Selma, AL | WSFA | NBC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
120 | Fargo/Valley City, ND | KVLY | NBC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
120 | Fargo/Valley City, ND | KXJB | (e) | CBS | 4/1/2022 | |||||
123 | La Crosse/Eau Claire, WI | WEAU | NBC | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
124 | Wilmington, NC | WECT | NBC | 12/1/2028 | ||||||
Our television stations, continued:
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
129 | Columbus, GA/Opelika, AL | WTVM | ABC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
132 | Rockford, IL | WIFR | (e) | CBS | 9/13/2021 | |||||
134 | Wausau/Rhinelander, WI | WSAW | CBS | 12/1/2021 | ||||||
134 | Wausau/Rhinelander, WI | WZAW | (e) | FOX | 12/1/2021 | |||||
137 | Amarillo, TX | KFDA | CBS | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
137 | (Clovis, NM) | KZBZ | (d) | CBS | 10/1/2022 | |||||
137 | Amarillo, TX | KEYU | TEL | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
139 | Panama City, FL | WJHG | NBC | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
139 | Panama City, FL | WECP | (e) | CBS | 2/1/2021 | |||||
140 | Topeka, KS | WIBW | CBS | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KCBD | NBC | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KLCW | CW | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KXTQ | (e) | TEL | 8/1/2022 | |||||
142 | Lubbock, TX | KMYL | (e) | MY | 8/1/2022 | |||||
143 | Minot/Bismark/Dickinson/Williston, ND | KFYR | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
143 | (Minot, ND) | KMOT | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
143 | (Williston, ND) | KUMV | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
143 | (Dickinson, ND) | KQCD | (d) | NBC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
145 | Monroe, LA/El Dorado, AR | KNOE | CBS/ABC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
148 | Anchorage, AK | KTUU | NBC | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
148 | Anchorage, AK | KYES | (e) | CBS | 2/1/2023 | |||||
150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KOSA | CBS | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
150 | (Big Springs) | KCWO | (d) | CW | 8/1/2022 | |||||
150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KWWT | MY | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KTLE | (e) | TEL | 8/1/2022 | |||||
151 | Bangor, ME | WABI | CBS | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
153 | Bikoxi/Gulfport, MS | WLOX | ABC/CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
154 | Wichita Falls, TX/Lawton, OK | KSWO | ABC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
154 | Wichita Falls, TX/Lawton, OK | KKTM | (e) | TEL | 6/1/2022 | |||||
160 | Gainesville, FL | WCJB | ABC | 2/1/2021 | ||||||
161 | Albany, GA | WALB | NBC/ABC | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
161 | Albany, GA | WGCW | (e) | CW | 4/1/2021 | |||||
163 | Sherman/Ada, TX | KXII | CBS/FOX | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
168 | Hattiesburg/Laurel, MS | WDAM | NBC/ABC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
170 | Lake Charles, LA | KPLC | NBC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
171 | Harrisonburg, VA | WHSV | ABC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
171 | Harrisonburg, VA | WSVF | (e) | FOX/CBS | 10/1/2028 | |||||
173 | Rapid City, SD | KOTA | ABC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
173 | Rapid City, SD | KEVN | (e) | FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
173 | (Lead, SD) | KHSD | (d) | ABC/FOX | 4/1/2022 | |||||
173 | (Sheridan, WY) | KSGW | (d) | ABC | 10/1/2022 | |||||
Our television stations, continued:
Primary | ||||||||||
Broadcast | ||||||||||
Station | Network | License | ||||||||
DMA | Call | Affiliation | Expiration | |||||||
Rank (a) | DMA | Letters | (b) | Date (c) | ||||||
174 | Watertown, NY | WWNY | CBS | 6/1/2023 | ||||||
174 | Watertown, NY | WNYF | (e) | FOX | 6/1/2023 | |||||
175 | Dothan, AL | WTVY | CBS | 4/1/2021 | ||||||
175 | Dothan, AL | WRGX | (e) | NBC | 4/1/2021 | |||||
176 | Clarksburg/Weston, WV | WDTV | CBS | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
176 | Clarksburg/Weston, WV | WVFX | FOX | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
177 | Marquette, MI | WLUC | NBC/FOX | 10/1/2021 | ||||||
179 | Bowling Green, KY | WBKO | ABC/FOX | 8/1/2021 | ||||||
180 | Alexandria, LA | KALB | NBC/CBS | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
181 | Grand Junction/Montrose, CO | KKCO | NBC | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
181 | Grand Junction/Montrose, CO | KJCT | (e) | ABC | 4/1/2022 | |||||
183 | Jonesboro, AR | KAIT | ABC/NBC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
185 | Laredo, TX | KGNS | NBC/ABC | 8/1/2022 | ||||||
185 | Laredo, TX | KYLX | (e) | CBS | 8/1/2022 | |||||
185 | Laredo, TX | KXNU | (e) | TEL | 8/1/2022 | |||||
189 | Charlottesville, VA | WVIR | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
190 | Meridian, MS | WTOK | ABC | 6/1/2021 | ||||||
192 | Parkersburg, WV | WTAP | NBC | 10/1/2028 | ||||||
192 | Parkersburg, WV | WIYE | (e) | CBS | 10/1/2028 | |||||
192 | Parkersburg, WV | WOVA | (e) | FOX | 10/1/2028 | |||||
193 | Twin Falls, ID | KMVT | CBS | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
193 | Twin Falls, ID | KSVT | (e) | FOX | 10/1/2022 | |||||
195 | Cheyenne, WY/Scottsbluff, NE | KGWN | CBS | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
195 | (Scottsbluff, NE) | KSTF | (d) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
195 | Cheyenne, WY/Scottsbluff, NE | KCHY | (e) | NBC | 10/1/2022 | |||||
198 | Mankato, MN | KEYC | CBS/FOX | 4/1/2022 | ||||||
198 | Mankato, MN | KMNF | (e) | NBC | 4/1/2022 | |||||
200 | Casper/Riverton, WY | KCWY | NBC | 10/1/2022 | ||||||
201 | Ottumwa, IA/Kirksville, MO | KYOU | NBC/FOX | 2/1/2022 | ||||||
203 | Fairbanks, AK | KXDF | CBS | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
203 | Fairbanks, AK | KTVF | (e) | NBC | 2/1/2023 | |||||
203 | Fairbanks, AK | KFXF | (e) | MY | 2/1/2023 | |||||
206 | Presque Isle, ME | WAGM | CBS/FOX | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
206 | Presque Isle, ME | WWPI | NBC | 4/1/2023 | ||||||
207 | Juneau, AK | KATH | NBC | 2/1/2023 | ||||||
207 | Juneau, AK | KYEX | (e) | CBS | 2/1/2023 | |||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KNOP | NBC | 6/1/2022 | ||||||
209 | (Scottsbluff, NE) | KNEP | (d) | NBC | 6/1/2022 | |||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KNPL | (e) | CBS | 6/1/2022 | |||||
209 | North Platte, NE | KIIT | (e) | FOX | 6/1/2022 | |||||
(a) | DMA rank and names for the 2020-2021 television season based on information published by Comscore. |
(b) | Indicates primary network affiliations. All primary channels and nearly all of our secondary channels broadcast by the stations are affiliated with at least one broadcast network. |
(c) | Indicates expiration dates of primary FCC broadcast license. Under FCC rules, a station’s license term is extended past the stated expiration date during the FCC’s processing of a timely-filed license renewal application. We anticipate that all pending license renewal applications will be granted in due course. |
(d) | Station is a satellite station under FCC rules and simulcasts the programming of our primary channel in its market. Station may offer some locally originated programming, such as local news. |
(e) | Station is a Class A or low-power television station. |
Cyclicality, Seasonality and Revenue Concentrations
Broadcast stations like ours rely on advertising revenue and are therefore sensitive to cyclical changes in the economy. Our political advertising revenue is generally not as significantly affected by economic slowdowns or recessions as non-political advertising revenue.
Broadcast advertising revenue is generally highest in the second and fourth quarters. This seasonality results partly from increases in consumer advertising in the spring and retail advertising in the period leading up to, and including, the Christmas holiday season. Broadcast advertising revenue is also typically higher in even-numbered years due to spending by political candidates, political parties and special interest groups during the “on year” of the two-year election cycle. Political advertising spending is typically heaviest during the fourth quarter. In addition, the broadcast of the Olympic Games by our NBC-affiliated stations generally leads to increased viewership and revenue during those years.
Our broadcast advertising revenue is earned from the sale of advertisements broadcast by our stations. Although no single customer represented more than 5% of our broadcast advertising revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 or 2018, we derived a material portion of our non-political broadcast advertising revenue from advertisers in a limited number of industries, particularly the automotive industry. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 approximately 21%, 25% and 25%, respectively, of our broadcast advertising revenue (excluding political advertising revenue) was obtained from advertising sales to automotive customers. Revenue from this industry may represent a higher percentage of total revenue in odd-numbered years due to, among other things, the increased availability of advertising time, as a result of such years being the “off year” of the two-year election cycle.
Station Network Affiliations. In addition to affiliations with ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX, our secondary channels are affiliated with numerous smaller networks and program services including, among others, the CW Network or the CW Plus Network (collectively, “CW”), MY Network, the MeTV Network, Justice, Circle, This TV Network, Antenna TV, Telemundo, Cozi, Heroes and Icons and MOVIES! Network. Certain of our secondary digital channels are affiliated with more than one network simultaneously. We also broadcast independent and local news/weather channels in some markets.
On January 1, 2020, Circle Media, LLC (“Circle”), a Nashville, Tennessee based joint venture between Opry Entertainment Group, a subsidiary of Ryman Hospitality Properties, and Gray launched a new country music and lifestyle television network on secondary channels of numerous television stations. Circle offers various content including entertainment news, documentaries, movies, archival, new and licensed programming, Grand Ole Opry performances, and more. Circle is currently broadcast on Gray television stations in approximately 75% of our markets as well as on stations in markets such as New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Atlanta, Nashville and many others through separate distribution agreements with CBS television stations, Meredith Corporation, and other broadcasters. Circle is also available on streaming platforms including Samsung TV Plus, The Roku Channel, Xumo, Redbox and Vizio.
The Big Four networks dominate broadcast television in terms of the amount of viewership that their original programming attracts. The “Big Three” major broadcast networks of CBS, NBC and ABC provide their respective network affiliates with a majority of the programming broadcast each day. FOX and CW provide their affiliates with a smaller portion of each day’s programming compared to the Big Three networks. The CW Plus Network generally provides programming for the entire broadcast day for CW affiliates in markets smaller than the top 100 DMAs.
We believe most successful commercial television stations obtain their brand identity from locally produced news programs; however, the affiliation of a station’s channels with one of the Big Four major networks can have a significant impact on the station’s programming, revenues, expenses and operations. A typical network provides an affiliate with network programming in exchange for a substantial majority of the advertising time available for sale during the airing of the network programs. The network then sells this advertising time and retains the revenue. The affiliate sells the remaining advertising time available within the network programming and non-network programming, and the affiliate retains most or all of these revenues. In seeking to acquire programming to supplement network-supplied programming, which we believe is critical to maximizing affiliate revenue, affiliates compete primarily with other affiliates and independent stations in their markets and, in certain cases, various national non-broadcast networks (“cable networks”) and various video streaming services that present competitive programming. The Big Four networks and CW charge fees to their affiliates for receiving network programming.
A television station may also acquire programming through barter arrangements. Under a programming barter arrangement, a national program distributor retains a fixed amount of advertising time within the program in exchange for the programming it supplies. The television station may pay a fixed fee for such programming.
We record revenue and expense for trade transactions involving the exchange of tangible goods or services with our customers. The revenue is recorded at the time the advertisement is broadcast and the expense is recorded at the time the goods or services are used. The revenue and expense associated with these transactions are based on the fair value of the assets or services received.
Affiliates of FOX and CW must purchase or produce a greater amount of programming for their non-network time periods, generally resulting in higher programming costs. However, affiliates of FOX and CW retain a larger portion of their advertising time inventory and the related revenues compared to Big Three affiliates.
Competition
Television stations compete for audiences, certain programming (including news) and advertisers. Cable network programming is a significant competitor of broadcast television programming. No single cable network regularly attains audience levels comparable to any major broadcast network. Despite increasing competition from cable channels, streaming services, digital platforms, social media, and internet-delivered video channels, television broadcasting remains the dominant distribution system for mass-market television advertising. In addition, signal coverage and carriage on MVPD systems materially affect a television station’s competitive position.
Audience. Stations compete for audience based on broadcast program popularity, which has a direct effect on advertising rates. Networks supply a substantial portion of our affiliated stations’ daily programming. Affiliated stations depend on the performance of the network programs to attract viewers. There can be no assurance that any such current or future programming created by our affiliated networks will achieve or maintain satisfactory viewership levels. Stations program non-network time periods with a combination of locally produced news, public affairs and entertainment programming, including national news or syndicated programs purchased for cash, cash and barter, or barter only.
MVPD systems have significantly altered the competitive landscape for audience in the television industry. Specifically, MVPD systems can increase a broadcasting station’s competition for viewers in a market by providing both cable networks and distant television station signals not otherwise available to the station’s audience.
Other sources of competition for audiences, programming and advertisers include streaming services, internet websites, mobile applications and wireless carriers, direct-to-consumer video distribution systems, and home entertainment systems.
Recent developments by many companies, including internet streaming service providers and internet website operators, have expanded, and are continuing to expand, the variety and quality of broadcast and non-broadcast video programming available to consumers via the internet. Internet companies have developed business relationships with companies that have traditionally provided syndicated programming, network television and other content. As a result, additional programming has, and is expected to further become, available through non-traditional methods, which can directly impact the number of TV viewers, and thus indirectly impact station rankings, popularity and revenue possibilities of our stations.
Programming. Competition for non-network programming involves negotiating with national program distributors, or syndicators, that sell “first run” and “off network” or rerun programming packages. Each station competes against the other broadcast stations in its market for exclusive access to first run programming (such as Wheel of Fortune) and off network reruns (such as Seinfeld). Broadcast stations also compete for exclusive news stories and features. Cable networks and internet service providers compete with local stations for programming.
Advertising. Advertising revenues comprise the primary source of revenues for our stations. Our stations compete for advertising revenues in their respective markets with other television stations, digital platforms including Google and Facebook, local cable and other MVPD systems, as well as local newspapers, radio stations, magazines, outdoor advertising, transit advertising, yellow page directories and direct mail.
Federal Regulation of the Television Broadcast Industry
General. Under the Communications Act of 1934 (“Communications Act”), television broadcast operations such as ours are subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC. Among other things, the Communications Act empowers the FCC to: (i) issue, revoke and modify broadcasting licenses; (ii) regulate stations’ operations and equipment; and (iii) impose penalties for violations of the Communications Act or FCC regulations. The Communications Act prohibits the assignment of a license or the transfer of control of a licensee without prior FCC approval.
License Grant and Renewal. The FCC grants broadcast licenses to television stations for terms of up to eight years. Broadcast licenses are of paramount importance to the operations of television stations. The Communications Act requires the FCC to renew a licensee’s broadcast license if the FCC finds that: (i) the station has served the public interest, convenience and necessity; (ii) there have been no serious violations of either the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules and regulations; and (iii) there have been no other violations which, taken together, would constitute a pattern of abuse. Historically the FCC has renewed broadcast licenses in substantially all cases. While we are not currently aware of any facts or circumstances that might prevent the renewal of our stations’ licenses at the end of their respective license terms, we cannot provide any assurances that any license will be renewed. Failure to renew any licenses upon the expiration of any license term could have a material adverse effect on our business. Under the Communications Act, the term of a broadcast license is automatically extended pending the FCC’s processing of a renewal application. For further information regarding the expiration dates of our stations’ current licenses and renewal application status, see the table under the heading “Stations”.
Media Ownership Restrictions and FCC Proceedings. The FCC’s broadcast ownership rules affect the number, type and location of broadcast properties that we may hold or acquire. The FCC adopted significant changes to its ownership rules, which took effect in February 2018. In November 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a mandate that vacated the FCC’s changes and reinstated the prior ownership rules. The Supreme Court of the United States granted the FCC’s petition for certiorari seeking review of the Third Circuit decision. The case was argued before the Supreme Court on January 19, 2021. The reinstated rules limit the common ownership, operation or control of, and “attributable” interests or voting power in: (i) television stations serving the same area; (ii) television stations and radio stations serving the same area; and (iii) daily newspapers and television or radio stations serving the same area. The rules also limit the aggregate national audience reach of television stations that may be under common ownership, operation and control, or in which a single person or entity may hold an official position or have more than a specified interest or percentage of voting power. The FCC’s rules also define the types of positions and interests that are considered attributable for purposes of the ownership limits, and thus also apply to our principals and certain investors.
The FCC is required by statute to review all of its broadcast ownership rules every four years to determine if such rules remain necessary in the public interest. In December 2018, the FCC began the new quadrennial review of its ownership rules. In its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”), the FCC is seeking comments on competition in the local television marketplace, including: (i) whether its current two-stations to a market limit should be relaxed or tightened; (ii) whether it should modify its general prohibition on owning two stations ranked among the top-four in a market; (iii) if the FCC’s television market analysis should consider the factors the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) applies to local television issues; and (iv) how the FCC should evaluate competition among television stations.
Local TV Ownership Rules. The FCC’s current television ownership rules allow one entity to own two commercial television stations in a DMA as long as the specified service contours of the stations do not overlap or, if they do, at least one of the stations is not ranked among the top four stations in the DMA and at least eight independently owned, full-power stations will remain in the DMA. Waivers of this rule may be available if at least one of the stations in a proposed combination qualifies, pursuant to specific criteria set forth in the FCC’s rules, as failed, failing, or unbuilt.
Cross-Media Limits. The newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule generally prohibits one entity from owning both a commercial broadcast station and a daily newspaper in the same community. The radio/television cross-ownership rule allows a party to own one or two TV stations and a varying number of radio stations within a single market.
National Television Station Ownership Rule. The maximum percentage of US households that a single owner can reach through commonly owned television stations is 39 percent. This limit was specified by Congress in 2004. The FCC applies a 50 percent “discount” for ultra-high frequency (“UHF”) stations. In December 2017, the FCC issued an NPRM seeking comment on whether it should modify or eliminate the national cap, including the UHF discount.
Conclusion. The FCC’s media ownership proceedings are on-going and, in many cases, are or will be subject to further judicial and potentially Congressional review. We cannot predict the outcome of any of these current or potential proceedings.
Attribution Rules. Under the FCC’s ownership rules, a direct or indirect purchaser of certain types of our securities could violate FCC regulations if that purchaser owned or acquired an “attributable” interest in other broadcast and daily newspaper properties in the same areas as one or more of our stations. Pursuant to FCC rules, the following relationships and interests are generally considered attributable for purposes of media ownership restrictions: (i) all officers and directors of a corporate licensee and its direct or indirect parent(s); (ii) voting stock interests of at least five percent; (iii) voting stock interests of at least 20 percent, if the holder is a passive institutional investor (such as an investment company, as defined in 15 U.S.C. 80a-3, bank, or insurance company); (iv) any equity interest in a limited partnership or limited liability company, unless properly “insulated” from management activities; (v) equity and/or debt interests that in the aggregate exceed 33 percent of a licensee’s total assets, if the interest holder supplies more than 15 percent of the station’s total weekly programming or is a same-market television broadcast company; and (vi) time brokerage of a television broadcast station by a same-market television broadcast company providing more than 15 percent of the station’s weekly programming.
Management services agreements and other types of shared services arrangements between same-market stations that do not include attributable time brokerage components generally are not deemed attributable under the FCC’s current rules and policies. However, the FCC previously requested comment on whether local news service agreements and/or shared services agreements should be considered attributable for purposes of applying the media ownership rules. The DOJ has taken steps under the antitrust laws to block certain transactions involving joint sales or other services agreements.
To our knowledge, no officer, director or five percent or greater shareholder currently holds an attributable interest in another television station that is inconsistent with the FCC’s ownership rules and policies or with our ownership of our stations.
Alien Ownership Restrictions. The Communications Act restricts the ability of foreign entities or individuals to own or hold interests in broadcast licenses. The Communications Act bars the following from holding broadcast licenses: foreign governments, representatives of foreign governments, non-citizens, representatives of non-citizens, and corporations or partnerships organized under the laws of a foreign nation. Foreign individuals or entities, collectively, may directly or indirectly own or vote no more than 20 percent of the capital stock of a licensee or 25 percent of the capital stock of a corporation that directly or indirectly controls a licensee. The 20 percent limit on foreign ownership of a licensee may not be waived. In September 2016, the Commission adopted an Order that allows broadcast licensees to use streamlined procedures when filing a petition for declaratory ruling seeking FCC approval to exceed the 25 percent foreign ownership benchmark for a parent company. The Commission also clarified the methodology for publicly traded broadcasters to assess compliance with the foreign ownership limits.
We serve as a holding company for our subsidiaries, including subsidiaries that hold station licenses. Therefore, absent a grant of a declaratory ruling, we may be restricted from having more than one-fourth of our stock owned or voted directly or indirectly by non-citizens, foreign governments, representatives of non-citizens or foreign governments, or foreign corporations.
Programming and Operations. Rules and policies of the FCC and other federal agencies regulate certain programming practices and other areas affecting the business or operations of broadcast stations.
The Children’s Television Act of 1990 limits commercial matter in children’s television programs and requires stations to present educational and informational children’s programming. Broadcasters are effectively required through license renewal processing guidelines to provide a certain amount of children’s educational programming per week on their primary channels. In July 2019, the FCC issued an Order that adopted sweeping changes to the current children’s programming rules giving broadcasters increased flexibility in how they choose to serve the educational and informational needs of children.
Over the past several years, the FCC has increased its enforcement efforts regarding broadcast indecency and profanity and the statutory maximum fine for broadcasting indecent material is currently $414,454 per incident. The FCC has sought comment on whether it should modify its indecency policies, but has not yet issued a decision in this proceeding. The outcome of this proceeding could affect future FCC policies in this area, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
EEO Rules. The FCC’s Equal Employment Opportunity (“EEO”) rules impose job information dissemination, recruitment, documentation and reporting requirements on broadcast station licensees. Broadcasters are subject to random audits to ensure compliance with EEO rules and may be sanctioned for noncompliance.
MVPD Retransmission of Local Television Signals. Under the Communications Act and FCC regulations, each television station generally has a so-called “must-carry” right to carriage of its primary channels on all MVPD systems serving their market. Each commercial television station may elect between invoking its “must carry” right or invoking a right to prevent an MVPD system from retransmitting the station’s signal without its consent (“retransmission consent”). Stations must make this election by October 1 every three years. Such elections are binding throughout the three-year cycle that commences on the subsequent January 1. The current election cycle commenced on January 1, 2021 and ends on December 31, 2023. During this period, our stations elected retransmission consent and have entered into retransmission consent contracts with virtually all MVPD systems serving their markets.
In accordance with STELAR, the FCC has promulgated rules that: (i) grant DBS providers the right to seek market modifications based on factors similar to those used in the cable industry; (ii) broaden the FCC’s prohibition against joint retransmission negotiations by prohibiting joint retransmission negotiations by any stations in the same DMA not under common control; (iii) prohibit a television station from limiting the ability of an MVPD to carry into its local market television signals that are deemed significantly viewed; and (iv) eliminate the “sweeps prohibition,” which precluded cable operators from deleting or repositioning local commercial television stations during “sweeps” ratings periods.
We currently are not a party to any agreements that delegate our authority to negotiate retransmission consent for any of our television stations or that grant us authority to negotiate retransmission consent for any other television station. Nevertheless, we cannot predict how the FCC’s restriction on joint negotiation might impact future opportunities.
The FCC has sought comment on whether it should modify or eliminate the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules. In March 2020, the FCC sought comment on whether it should modernize its methodology for determining whether a television station is significantly viewed in a community outside of its local television market. Under exceptions to the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules, cable operators and satellite carriers are not required to delete the duplicating network or syndicated programming where the signal of the otherwise distant station is determined to be significantly viewed in the relevant community. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings. If, however, the FCC eliminates or relaxes its rules enforcing our program exclusivity rights, it could affect our ability to negotiate future retransmission consent agreements, and it could harm our ratings and advertising revenue if cable and satellite operators import duplicative programming.
Certain online video distributors (“OVDs”) have explored streaming broadcast programming over the internet without the consent of the copyright owner of the programming. The majority of federal courts have sided with broadcasters and enjoined OVDs from streaming broadcast programming. Recently, a new OVD, organized as a non-profit, began offering free access to broadcast programming in select cities over the Internet. This OVD argues that its retransmission of broadcast signals via the internet is covered by an exemption from copyright liability applicable to non-profit entities. In July 2019, the major broadcast networks and certain affiliated entities filed a copyright suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York challenging this OVD’s operations. That suit remains pending and the OVD has continued its operations.
On December 19, 2014, the FCC issued an NPRM seeking comment on its proposal to modernize the term “MVPD” to be technology neutral. If the NPRM proposal is adopted, an entity that uses the internet to distribute multiple streams of linear programming would be considered an MVPD and would have the same retransmission consent rights and obligations as other MVPDs, including the right to negotiate with television stations to carry their broadcast signals. The FCC also asked about the possible copyright implications of this proposal. We cannot predict the outcome of the FCC’s interpretive proceedings.
In December 2019, the Satellite Television Community Protection and Promotion Act of 2019 and the Television Viewer Protection Act of 2019 (the “TVPA of 2019”) were signed into law. Among other things, these acts (i) made permanent the copyright license set out in Section 119 of the Copyright Act; (ii) limited eligibility for use of the Section 119 license to retransmit the signals of network television broadcast stations to unserved households to those satellite operators who provide local-into-local service to all DMAs; and (iii) modified the definition of unserved households to those households located in a “short market” (which, in turn, was defined as a local market in which programming of one or more of the top four networks is not offered on either the primary or multicast stream by any network station in that market). The TVPA of 2019 also made permanent the requirement that broadcasters and MVPDs negotiate in good faith and adds a provision that (i) allows MVPDs to designate a buying group to negotiate retransmission consent agreements on their behalf and (ii) requires large stations groups, such as us, to negotiate in good faith with a qualified MVPD buying group. The rules that the FCC promulgated to implement those provisions of the TVPA of 2019 became effective in July 2020.
In December 2020, we filed a good faith negotiation complaint against Citizens Telecom Services Company, LLC d/b/a Frontier Communications (“Frontier”) stating that Frontier violated its duty to negotiate in good faith concerning the carriage of WWSB(TV), Sarasota, Florida, WCSC-TV, Charleston, South Carolina, and WMBF-TV, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The stations currently are not being carried on the Frontier systems, and the proceeding remains pending at the FCC.
The Incentive Auction concluded in 2017 requiring the FCC to reallocate 84 MHz of spectrum to new users. As part of this reallocation process, certain television stations that did not sell their spectrum in the reverse auction were required to change channels and modify their transmission facilities (the “Repack”). The FCC was required to use “reasonable efforts” to preserve a station’s coverage area and population served and cannot require a station to involuntarily move from the UHF band to the VHF band or from the high VHF band to the low VHF band. These changes may constrain our ability to provide high definition programming and additional program streams, including mobile video services. The underlying legislation authorizes the FCC to reimburse stations for reasonable relocation costs. In March 2018, Congress adopted the Reimbursement Expansion Act (“REA”) to expand the list of entities eligible to be reimbursed for Repack expenses to include LPTV and TV translator stations. The REA also increased the funds available to reimburse full power and Class A stations. The FCC protected only full power and Class A television stations during the Repack. In certain markets, our low power television stations were displaced by this process requiring us to locate alternate channels for ongoing operations.
We cannot predict the likelihood, timing or outcome of any court, Congressional or FCC regulatory action with respect to the repacking of broadcast television spectrum, nor the impact of any such changes upon our business.
The foregoing does not purport to be a complete summary of the Communications Act, other applicable statutes, or the FCC’s rules, regulations or policies. Proposals for additional or revised regulations and requirements are pending before, are being considered by, and may in the future be considered by, Congress and federal regulatory agencies from time to time. We cannot predict the effect of any existing or proposed federal legislation, regulations or policies on our business. Also, several of the foregoing matters are now, or may become, the subject of litigation, and we cannot predict the outcome of any such litigation or the effect on our business.
Human Capital
Successful execution of our strategy is dependent on attracting, developing and retaining key employees and members of our management team. We believe the substantial skills, experience and industry knowledge of our employees and our training of our customer-facing employees benefit our operations and performance. There are several ways in which we attract, develop, and retain highly qualified talent, including:
● | Training and investing in our employees. With competitive wages, healthcare benefits, a defined contribution retirement program and opportunities for job training and advancement, our employees develop skills and expertise necessary to build careers. |
● | Driving a diverse and inclusive culture. We are committed to diversity and inclusion in every aspect of our business. As we strive to deliver high-quality products and services that exceed expectations, we embrace the unique perspectives and experiences of our employees and partners and the communities we serve. We are striving to enhance diversity at every level of our organization, including among our senior leaders.
With the support and feedback of these pilot teams, we hope to outline strategies to continue the transformation of our workplace culture. We are listening to the feedback from the pilot program teams and employees in general on these important topics. We continue to encourage and support feedback from all our employees. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
● | Focusing on a safe and healthy workplace.We value our employees and are committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace. All employees are required to comply with company safety rules and expectations and are expected to actively contribute to making our company a safer place to work. In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, we continue to maintain operations while employing the latest guidelines to promote the health of our employees. |
Employees
As of February 19, 2021, we had 7,017 full-time employees and 245 part-time employees, of which 225 full-time and six part-time employees at eight stations were represented by various unions. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Corporate Information
Gray Television, Inc. is a Georgia corporation, incorporated in 1897 initially to publish the Albany Herald in Albany, Georgia. We entered the broadcast industry in 1953. Our executive offices are located at 4370 Peachtree Road, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30319, and our telephone number at that location is (404) 504-9828. Our website address is http://www.gray.tv. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference or part of this or any other report we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We make the following reports filed or furnished, as applicable, with the SEC available, free of charge, on our website under the heading “SEC Filings” as soon as practicable after they are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC: our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to any of the foregoing.
A Code of Ethics (“Code”) applies to all of our directors, executive officers and employees. The Code is available on our website in the Investor Relations section under the subheading Governance Documents. If any waivers of the Code are granted to an executive officer or director, the waivers will be disclosed in an SEC filing on Form 8-K.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information contained in, incorporated by reference into or otherwise referred to in this annual report on Form 10-K, you should consider carefully the following factors when evaluating our business. Any of these risks, or the occurrence of any of the events described in these risk factors, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and the results of operations. In addition, other risks or uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently do not deem material could arise, any of which could also materially adversely affect us. This annual report on Form 10-K also contains and incorporates by reference forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the occurrence of one or more of the following risk factors.
RisksRelated to Our Indebtedness
We have substantial debt and have the ability to incur significant additional debt. The principal and interest payment obligations on such debt may restrict our future operations and impair our ability to meet our long-term obligations.
Currently we have approximately $4.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of outstanding indebtedness, excluding intercompany debt and deferred financing costs. Subject to our ability to meet certain borrowing conditions under our senior credit facility (the “2019 Senior Credit Facility”), we have the ability to incur significant additional debt, including secured debt under our un-drawn $200 million revolving credit facility. The terms of the indenture (the “2030 Notes Indenture”) governing our outstanding 4.750% senior notes due 2030 (the “2030 Notes”), the indenture (the “2027 Notes Indenture”) governing our outstanding 7.0% senior notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”) and the indenture (the “2026 Notes Indenture”) governing our outstanding 5.875% senior notes due 2026 (the “2026 Notes”) also permit us to incur additional indebtedness, subject to our ability to meet certain borrowing conditions.
Our substantial debt may have important consequences. For instance, it could:
| ● | require us to dedicate a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to the payment of interest and principal due under our debt, which would reduce funds available for other business purposes, including capital expenditures and acquisitions; | |
| ● | place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to some of our competitors that may have less debt and better access to capital resources; | |
| ● | limit our ability to obtain additional financing to fund acquisitions, working capital and capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes; and | |
| ● | make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations. |
Our ability to service our significant financial obligations depends on our ability to generate significant cash flow. This is partially subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate cash flow from operations, that future borrowings will be available to us under our 2019 Senior Credit Facility or any other credit facilities, or that we will be able to complete any necessary financings, in amounts sufficient to enable us to fund our operations or pay our debts and other obligations, or to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow to service our obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt, sell assets, reduce or delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital. Additional debt or equity financing may not be available in sufficient amounts, at times or on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Specifically, volatility in the capital markets may also impact our ability to obtain additional financing, or to refinance our existing debt, on terms or at times favorable to us. If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives, we may not be able to service our debt or other obligations, which could result in us being in default thereon, in which circumstances our lenders could cease making loans to us, and lenders or other holders of our debt could accelerate and declare due all outstanding obligations due under the respective agreements, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Theagreementsgoverningourvariousdebtobligationsimposerestrictionsonouroperationsand limitourabilitytoundertakecertaincorporateactions.
The agreements governing our various debt obligations, including our 2019 Senior Credit Facility, the 2030 Notes Indenture, the 2027 Notes Indenture and the 2026 Notes Indenture (together, the “existing indentures” or the “indentures”), include covenants imposing significant restrictions on our operations. These restrictions may affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. These covenants place, or will place, restrictions on our ability to, among other things:
● | incur additional debt, subject to certain limitations; |
● | declare or pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions to stockholders; |
● | make investments or acquisitions; |
● | create liens or use assets as security in other transactions; |
● | issue guarantees; |
● | merge or consolidate, or sell, transfer, lease or dispose of substantially all of our assets; |
● | amend our articles of incorporation |
● | engage in transactions with affiliates; and |
● | purchase, sell or transfer certain assets. |
Any of these restrictions and limitations could make it more difficult for us to execute our business strategy.
The existing indentures and our 2019 Senior Credit Facilityrequireustocomplywithcertainfinancialratios or other covenants;ourfailure todosowouldresultinadefaultthereunder,whichwouldhaveamaterialadverseeffectonus.
We are required to comply with certain financial or other covenants under the existing indentures and our 2019 Senior Credit Facility. Our ability to comply with these requirements may be affected by events affecting our business, but beyond our control, including prevailing general economic, financial and industry conditions. These covenants could have an adverse effect on us by limiting our ability to take advantage of financing, investment, acquisition or other corporate opportunities. The breach of any of these covenants or restrictions could result in a default under the existing indentures or our 2019 Senior Credit Facility.
Upon a default under any of our debt agreements, the lenders or debtholders thereunder could have the right to declare all amounts outstanding, together with accrued and unpaid interest, to be immediately due and payable, which could, in turn, trigger defaults under other debt obligations and could result in the termination of commitments of the lenders to make further extensions of credit under our 2019 Senior Credit Facility. If we were unable to repay our secured debt to our lenders, or were otherwise in default under any provision governing our outstanding secured debt obligations, our secured lenders could proceed against us and our subsidiary guarantors and against the collateral securing that debt. Any default resulting in an acceleration of outstanding indebtedness, a termination of commitments under our financing arrangements or lenders proceeding against the collateral securing such indebtedness would likely result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Ourvariablerateindebtednesssubjectsustointerestraterisk,whichcouldcauseourannualdebtserviceobligations toincrease significantly.
Borrowings under our 2019 Senior Credit Facility are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If the rates on which our borrowings are based were to increase from current levels, our debt service obligations on our variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same, and our net income and cash available to service our other obligations would decrease.
Risks Related to Our Business
Operating Risks
The COVID-19 global pandemic has had and is expected to continue to have an adverse impact on our business.
The COVID-19 global pandemic has negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted consumer spending and created significant volatility and disruption of financial markets. We expect the COVID-19 global pandemic to have a material adverse impact on our business including our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on our business, including our ability to execute our near-term and long-term business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frame, will depend on numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict or assess, including the duration and scope of the pandemic; the negative impact it has on global and regional economies and economic activity; changes in advertising customers and consumer behavior; impact of governmental regulations that might be imposed in response to the pandemic, its short and longer-term impact on the levels of consumer confidence; actions governments, businesses and individuals take in response to the pandemic; and how quickly economies recover after the COVID-19 global pandemic subsides. Although we have continued to operate our facilities to date and have taken precautions, consistent with federal guidelines and state and local orders, to protect the safety and well-being of our employees, customers and the general public, the COVID-19 global pandemic and any preventive or protective actions taken by governmental authorities have had and may continue to have a material adverse impact on our workforce and operations. In addition, we may become party to lawsuits related to the risk of exposure to the coronavirus that causes COVID-19.
The COVID-19 global pandemic has had, and will continue to have, a widespread and broad reaching effect on the economy and could have adverse impacts on our clients, which has resulted and could continue to result in a decrease in advertising spend and/or heighten the risk with respect to the collectability of our receivables. Additionally, as a result of the COVID-19 global pandemic, we have experienced a disruption in creation of content that we broadcast on our television stations and of events and programs we produce at our production companies, including the cancellation of certain sports events and the shutting down of production of certain television content.
Consumer spending and changes in advertising generally may also be negatively impacted by general macroeconomic conditions and consumer confidence, including the impacts of any recession, resulting from the COVID-19 global pandemic. This may negatively impact revenues. In addition, disruption of global financial markets as a result of the COVID-19 global pandemic could have a negative impact on our ability to access capital in the future.
The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on our business is highly uncertain and difficult to predict, as information is rapidly evolving with respect to the duration and severity of the pandemic and the resulting effects on local, national and global economies. At this point, we cannot reasonably estimate the duration and severity of the COVID-19 global pandemic, or its overall impact on our business. Even after the COVID-19 global pandemic has subsided, we may continue to experience adverse impacts to our business as a result of any economic recession or depression that has occurred or may occur in the future. The effects of the COVID-19 global pandemic may also impact financial markets and corporate credit markets which could adversely impact our access to financing or the terms of any such financing. Any of these events could exacerbate the other risks and uncertainties described herein, or in other reports filed with the SEC from time to time, and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or stock price.
Thesuccessofourbusinessisdependentuponadvertisingrevenues,whichareseasonalandcyclical,andalsofluctuateasaresultofanumberoffactors,someofwhicharebeyondourcontrol.
Our main source of revenue is the sale of advertising time and space. Our ability to sell advertising time and space depends on, among other things:
● | economic conditions in the areas where our stations are located and in the nation as a whole; |
● | the popularity of the programming offered by our television stations; |
● | changes in the population demographics in the areas where our stations are located; | |
| ● | local and national advertising price fluctuations, which can be affected by the availability of programming, the popularity of programming, and the relative supply of and demand for commercial advertising; | |
| ● | our competitors’ activities, including increased competition from other advertising-based mediums, particularly digital platforms, cable networks, MVPDs and other internet companies; | |
| ● | the duration and extent of any network preemption of regularly scheduled programming for any reason; |
● | decisions by advertisers to withdraw or delay planned advertising expenditures for any reason; | |
| ● | labor disputes or other disruptions at major national advertisers, programming providers or networks; and |
● | other factors beyond our control. |
Our results are also subject to seasonal and cyclical fluctuations. Seasonal fluctuations typically result in higher revenue and broadcast operating income in the second and fourth quarters rather than in the first and third quarters of each year. This seasonality is primarily attributable to advertisers’ increased expenditures in the spring and in anticipation of holiday season spending in the fourth quarter and an increase in television viewership during these periods. In addition, we typically experience fluctuations in our revenue and broadcast operating income between even-numbered and odd-numbered years. In years in which there are impending elections for various state and national offices, which primarily occur in even-numbered years, political advertising revenue tends to increase, often significantly, and particularly during presidential election years. We consider political broadcast advertising revenue to be revenue earned from the sale of advertising to political candidates, political parties and special interest groups of advertisements broadcast by our stations that contain messages primarily focused on elections and/or public policy issues. In even-numbered years, we typically derive a material portion of our broadcast advertising revenue from political broadcast advertisers. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we derived approximately 18% and 3%, respectively, of our total revenue from political broadcast advertisers. If political broadcast advertising revenues declined, especially in an even-numbered year, our results of operations and financial condition could also be materially adversely affected. Also, our stations affiliated with the NBC Network broadcast Olympic Games and typically experience increased viewership and revenue during those broadcasts. As a result of the seasonality and cyclicality of our revenue and broadcast operating income, and the historically significant increase in our revenue and broadcast operating income during even-numbered years, it has been, and is expected to remain, difficult to engage in period-over-period comparisons of our revenue and results of operations.
Continueduncertainfinancialandeconomicconditionsmayhaveanadverseimpactonourbusiness, resultsofoperationsorfinancialcondition.
Financial and economic conditions continue to be uncertain over the longer term and the continuation or worsening of such conditions could reduce consumer confidence and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition. If consumer confidence were to decline, this decline could negatively affect our advertising customers’ businesses and their advertising budgets. In addition, volatile economic conditions could have a negative impact on our industry or the industries of our customers who advertise on our stations, resulting in reduced advertising sales. Furthermore, it may be possible that actions taken by any governmental or regulatory body for the purpose of stabilizing the economy or financial markets will not achieve their intended effect. In addition to any negative direct consequences to our business or results of operations arising from these financial and economic developments, some of these actions may adversely affect financial institutions, capital providers, advertisers or other consumers on whom we rely, including for access to future capital or financing arrangements necessary to support our business. Our inability to obtain financing in amounts and at times necessary could make it more difficult or impossible to meet our obligations or otherwise take actions in our best interests.
Ourdependenceuponalimitednumberofadvertisingcategoriescouldadverselyaffectourbusiness.
We consider broadcast advertising revenue to be revenue earned primarily from the sale of advertisements broadcast by our stations. Although no single customer represented more than 5% of our broadcast advertising revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019, we derived a material portion of non-political broadcast advertising revenue from advertisers in a limited number of industries, particularly the automotive industry. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 we derived approximately 21% and 25%, respectively, of our total broadcast advertising revenue from our advertisers in the automotive industry. Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected if broadcast advertising revenue from the automotive, or certain other industries, such as the medical, restaurant, communications, or furniture and appliances industries, declined.
Weintendtocontinuetoevaluategrowthopportunitiesthroughstrategicacquisitions,andtherearesignificantrisksassociatedwithanacquisitionstrategy.
We intend to continue to evaluate opportunities for growth through selective acquisitions of television stations or station groups. There can be no assurances that we will be able to identify any suitable acquisition candidates, and we cannot predict whether we will be successful in pursuing or completing any acquisitions, or what the consequences of not completing any acquisitions would be. Consummation of any proposed acquisition at any time may also be subject to various conditions such as compliance with FCC rules and policies. Consummation of acquisitions may also be subject to antitrust or other regulatory requirements. In addition, as we operate in a highly regulated industry, we could be subject to litigation, government investigations and enforcement actions on a variety of matters, the result of which could limit our acquisition strategy.
An acquisition strategy involves numerous other risks, including risks associated with:
| ● | identifying suitable acquisition candidates and negotiating definitive purchase agreements on satisfactory terms; | |
| ● | integrating operations and systems and managing a large and geographically diverse group of stations; |
● | obtaining financing to complete acquisitions, which financing may not |
● | diverting our management’s attention from other business concerns; |
● | potentially losing key employees; and |
● | potential changes in the regulatory approval process that may make it materially more expensive, or materially delay our ability, to consummate any proposed acquisitions. |
Our failure to identify suitable acquisition candidates, or to complete any acquisitions and integrate any acquired business, or to obtain the expected benefits therefrom, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Wemayfailtorealizeanybenefitsandincurunanticipated lossesrelatedtoanyacquisition.
The success of any strategic acquisition depends, in part, on our ability to successfully combine the acquired business and assets with our business and our ability to successfully manage the assets so acquired. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of ongoing business or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of an acquisition. Successful integration may also be hampered by any differences between the operations and corporate culture of the two organizations. Additionally, general market and economic conditions may inhibit our successful integration of any business. If we experience difficulties with the integration process, the anticipated benefits of an acquisition may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. Finally, any cost savings that are realized may be offset by losses in revenues from the acquired business, any assets or operations disposed of in connection therewith or otherwise, or charges to earnings in connection with such acquisitions.
Wemustpurchasetelevisionprogramminginadvanceofknowingwhetheraparticularshowwillbepopularenoughforustorecoupourcosts.
One of our most significant costs is for the purchase of television programming. If a particular program is not sufficiently popular among audiences in relation to the cost we pay for such program, we may not be able to sell enough related advertising time for us to recover the costs we pay to broadcast the program. We are frequently required to purchase programming several years in advance, and we may have to commit to purchase more than one year’s worth of programming, resulting in the incurrence of significant costs in advance of our receipt of any related revenue. We may also replace programs that are performing poorly before we have recaptured any significant portion of the costs we incurred in obtaining such programming or fully expensed the costs for financial reporting purposes. Any of these factors could reduce our revenues, result in the incurrence of impairment charges or otherwise cause our costs to escalate relative to revenues.
Wearehighlydependentuponournetworkaffiliations,andourbusinessandresultsofoperationsmaybemateriallyaffectedifanetwork:(i)terminatesitsaffiliationwithus;(ii)significantlychangestheeconomictermsandconditionsofanyfutureaffiliationagreementswithusor;(iii)significantlychangesthetype,qualityorquantityofprogrammingprovidedtousunderanaffiliationagreement.
Our business depends in large part on the success of our network affiliations. Nearly all of our stations are directly or indirectly affiliated with at least one of the four major broadcast networks pursuant to a separate affiliation agreement. Each affiliation agreement provides the affiliated station with the right to broadcast all programs transmitted by the affiliated network during the term of the related agreement. Our affiliation agreements generally expire at various dates through December 2023.
If we cannot enter into affiliation agreements to replace any agreements in advance of their expiration, we would no longer be able to carry the affiliated network’s programming. This loss of programming would require us to seek to obtain replacement programming. Such replacement programming may involve higher costs and may not be as attractive to our target audiences, thereby reducing our ability to generate advertising revenue. Furthermore, our concentration of CBS and/or NBC affiliates makes us particularly sensitive to adverse changes in our business relationship with, and the general success of, CBS and/or NBC.
We can give no assurance that any future affiliation agreements will have economic terms or conditions equivalent to or more advantageous to us than our current agreements. If in the future a network or networks impose more adverse economic terms upon us, such event or events could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, if we are unable to renew or replace any existing affiliation agreements, we may be unable to satisfy certain obligations under our existing or any future retransmission consent agreements with MVPDs and/or secure payment of retransmission consent fees under such agreements. Furthermore, if in the future a network limited or removed our ability to retransmit network programming to MVPDs, we may be unable to satisfy certain obligations or criteria for fees under any existing or any future retransmission consent agreements. In either case, such an event could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
WearealsodependentuponourretransmissionconsentagreementswithMVPDs,andwecannot predicttheoutcomeofpotentialregulatorychangestotheretransmissionconsentregime.
We are also dependent, in significant part, on our retransmission consent agreements. Our current retransmission consent agreements expire at various times over the next several years. No assurances can be provided that we will be able to renegotiate all of such agreements on favorable terms, on a timely basis, or at all. The failure to renegotiate such agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our ability to successfully negotiate future retransmission consent agreements may be hindered by potential legislative or regulatory charges to the framework under which these agreements are negotiated.
The FCC has taken actions to implement various provisions of STELAR affecting the carriage of television stations, including (i) adopting rules that allow for the modification of satellite television markets in order to ensure that satellite operators carry the broadcast stations of most interest to their communities; (ii) tightening its rules on joint retransmission consent negotiations to prohibit joint negotiations by stations in the same market unless those stations are commonly controlled; (iii) prohibiting a television station from limiting the ability of an MVPD to carry into its local market television signals that are deemed significantly viewed; and (iv) eliminating the “sweeps prohibition,” which had precluded cable operators from deleting or repositioning local commercial television stations during “sweeps” ratings periods.
We currently are not a party to any agreements that delegate our authority to negotiate retransmission consent for any of our television stations or grant us authority to negotiate retransmission consent for any other television station. Nevertheless, we cannot predict how the FCC’s restrictions on joint negotiations might impact future opportunities.
The FCC also has sought comment on whether it should modify or eliminate the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules. We cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding. If, however, the FCC eliminates or relaxes its rules enforcing our program exclusivity rights, it could affect our ability to negotiate future retransmission consent agreements, and it could harm our ratings and advertising revenue if cable and satellite operators import duplicative programming.
In addition, certain OVDs have explored streaming broadcast programming over the internet without approval from or payments to the broadcaster. The majority of federal courts have issued preliminary injunctions enjoining these OVDs from streaming broadcast programming. Recently, a new OVD, organized as a non-profit began operating, claiming that its operations are exempt from copyright liability because of its non-profit status. In July 2019, the major broadcast networks and certain affiliated entities filed a copyright lawsuit against this OVD. The OVD continues to operate while the lawsuit is pending. We cannot predict the outcome of this lawsuit. Separately, on December 19, 2014, the FCC issued an NPRM proposing to classify certain OVDs as MVPDs for purposes of certain FCC carriage rules. If the FCC adopts its proposal, OVDs would need to negotiate for consent from broadcasters before they retransmit broadcast signals. We cannot predict whether the FCC will adopt its proposal or other modified rules that might weaken our rights to negotiate with OVDs.
In December 2019, Congress adopted the Satellite Television Community Protection and Promotion Act of 2019 and the TVPA of 2019. Among other things, these acts (i) made permanent the copyright license set out in Section 119 of the Copyright Act; (ii) limited eligibility for use of the Section 119 license to retransmit the signals of network television broadcast stations to unserved households to those satellite operators who provide local-into-local service to all DMAs; and (iii) modified the definition of unserved households to those households located in a “short market” (which, in turn, was defined as a local market in which programming of one or more of the top four networks is not offered on either the primary or multicast stream by any network station in that market). The TVPA of 2019 also made permanent the requirement that broadcasters and MVPDs negotiate in good faith and adds a provision that will (i) allow MVPDs to designate a buying group to negotiate retransmission consent agreements on their behalf and (ii) require large stations groups, including ours, to negotiate in good faith with a qualified MVPD buying group.
Congress continues to consider various changes to the statutory scheme governing retransmission of broadcast programming. Some of the proposed bills would make it more difficult to negotiate retransmission consent agreements with large MVPDs and would weaken our leverage to seek market-based compensation for our programming. We cannot predict whether any of these proposals will become law, and, if any do, we cannot determine the effect that any statutory changes would have on our business.
Wemaybeunabletomaintainorincreaseourdigitaladvertisingrevenue,whichcouldhaveamaterialadverseeffectonourbusinessandoperatingresults.
We generate a portion of our advertising revenue from the sale of advertisements on our digital sites. Our ability to maintain and increase this advertising revenue is largely dependent upon the number of users actively visiting our internet sites and using our digital apps. As a result, we must increase user engagement with our internet sites in order to increase our advertising revenue. Because digital advertising techniques are evolving, if our content, technology and advertisement serving techniques do not evolve to meet the changing needs of advertisers, our advertising revenue could also decline. Changes in our business model, advertising inventory or initiatives could also cause a decrease in our internet advertising revenue.
We do not have long-term agreements with most of our digital advertisers. Any termination, change or decrease in our relationships with our largest digital advertising clients could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability. If we do not maintain or increase our digital advertising revenue, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Cybersecurityriskscouldaffectouroperatingeffectiveness.
We use computers in substantially all aspects of our business operations. Our revenues are increasingly dependent on digital products. Such use exposes us to potential cyber incidents resulting from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. These incidents could include, but are not limited to, unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, data corruption or operational disruption. The results of these incidents could include, but are not limited to, business interruption, disclosure of nonpublic information, decreased advertising revenues, misstated financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection costs, litigation, financial consequences and reputational damage adversely affecting customer or investor confidence, any or all of which could adversely affect our business. Although we have systems and processes in place to protect against risks associated with cyber incidents, depending on the nature of an incident, these protections may not be fully sufficient.
Industry Risks
Weoperateinahighlycompetitiveenvironment.Competitionoccursonmultiplelevels(foraudiences,programmingandadvertisers)andisbasedonavarietyoffactors.Ifwearenotabletosuccessfullycompeteinallrelevantaspects,ourrevenueswillbemateriallyadverselyaffected.
Television stations compete for audiences, certain programming (including news) and advertisers. Signal coverage and carriage on MVPD systems also materially affect a television station’s competitive position. With respect to audiences, stations compete primarily based on broadcast program popularity. We cannot provide any assurances as to the acceptability by audiences of any of the programs we broadcast. Further, because we compete with other broadcast stations for certain programming, we cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to obtain any desired programming at costs that we believe are reasonable. Cable-network programming, combined with increased access to cable, satellite TV, and internet video streaming services, has become a significant competitor for broadcast television programming viewers. Cable networks’ viewership and advertising share have increased due to the growth in MVPD and internet video streaming services, penetration (the percentage of television households that are connected to an MVPD or internet video system) and increased investments in programming by cable networks or internet video. Further increases in the advertising share of cable networks and internet video streaming services could materially adversely affect the advertising revenue of our television stations.
In addition, technological innovation and the resulting proliferation of programming alternatives, such as internet websites, mobile apps and wireless carriers, direct-to-consumer video distribution systems, and home entertainment systems have further fractionalized television viewing audiences and resulted in additional challenges to revenue generation. New technologies and methods of buying advertising also present an additional competitive challenge, as competitors may offer products and services such as the ability to purchase advertising programmatically or bundled offline and online advertising, aimed at more efficiently capturing advertising spend.
Our inability or failure to broadcast popular programs, or otherwise maintain viewership for any reason, including as a result of increases in programming alternatives, or our loss of advertising due to technological changes, could result in a lack of advertisers, or a reduction in the amount advertisers are willing to pay us to advertise, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Other Financial Risks
Wehave,inthepast,incurredimpairmentchargesonourgoodwilland/orbroadcastlicenses,andanysuchfuturechargesmayhaveamaterialeffectonthevalueofourtotalassets.
As of December 31, 2020, the book value of our broadcast licenses was $3.6 billion and the book value of our goodwill was $1.5 billion, in comparison to total assets of $7.6 billion. Not less than annually, and more frequently if necessary, we are required to evaluate our goodwill and broadcast licenses to determine if the estimated fair value of these intangible assets is less than book value. If the estimated fair value of these intangible assets is less than book value, we will be required to record a non-cash expense to write down the book value of the intangible asset to the estimated fair value. We cannot make any assurances that any required impairment charges will not have a material adverse effect on our total assets.
Recently enacted changes to the United States tax laws may have a material impact on our business or financial condition.
On December 22, 2017, United States tax reform legislation known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) was signed into law. The TCJA made substantial changes to United States tax law, including a reduction in the corporate tax rate, a limitation on deductibility of interest expense, a limitation on the use of net operating losses to offset future taxable income and the allowance of immediate expensing of capital expenditures. The TCJA will continue to have significant effects on us, some of which may be adverse. The extent of the impact remains uncertain at this time and is subject to any other regulatory or administrative developments, including any further regulations or other guidance yet to be promulgated by the United States Internal Revenue Service. The TCJA contains numerous, complex provisions that could affect us.
Weareaholdingcompanywithnomaterialindependentassetsoroperationsandwedependonoursubsidiariesforcash.
We are a holding company with no material independent assets or operations, other than our investments in our subsidiaries. Because we are a holding company, we are dependent upon the payment of dividends, distributions, loans or advances to us by our subsidiaries to fund our obligations. These payments could be or become subject to dividend or other restrictions under applicable laws in the jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate. Payments by our subsidiaries are also contingent upon the subsidiaries’ earnings. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funds from our subsidiaries to fund our obligations, our financial condition and ability to meet our obligations may be adversely affected.
Our defined benefit pensionplanobligation iscurrentlyunderfunded,and,ifcertainfactorsworsen,wemayhavetomakesignificantcashpayments,whichcouldreducethecashavailable forourbusiness.
We have underfunded obligations under our defined benefit pension plan. Notwithstanding that our pension plan is frozen with regard to any future benefit accruals, the funded status of our pension plan is dependent upon many factors, including returns on invested assets, the level of certain market interest rates and the discount rate used to determine pension obligations. Unfavorable returns on the plan’s assets or unfavorable changes in applicable laws or regulations may materially change the timing and amount of required plan funding, which could reduce the cash available for our business. In addition, any future decreases in the discount rate used to determine pension obligations could result in an increase in the valuation of pension obligations, which could affect the reported funding status of our pension plan and future contributions.
Risks Related to Regulatory Matters
Federal broadcasting industry regulations limit our operating flexibility.
The FCC regulates all television broadcasters, including us. We must obtain FCC approval whenever we (i) apply for a new license; (ii) seek to renew, modify or assign a license; (iii) purchase a broadcast station; and/or (iv) transfer the control of one of our subsidiaries that holds a license. Our FCC licenses are critical to our operations, and we cannot operate without them. We cannot be certain that the FCC will renew these licenses in the future or approve new acquisitions, mergers, divestitures or other business activities. Our failure to renew any licenses upon the expiration of any license term could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Federal legislation and FCC rules have changed significantly in recent years and may continue to change. These changes may limit our ability to conduct our business in ways that we believe would be advantageous and may affect our operating results.
The FCC can sanction us for programming broadcast on our stations that it finds to be indecent.
Over the past several years, the FCC has increased its enforcement efforts regarding broadcast indecency and profanity and the statutory maximum fine for broadcasting indecent material is currently $414,454 per incident. In June 2012, the Supreme Court decided a challenge to the FCC’s indecency enforcement policies without resolving the scope of the FCC’s ability to regulate broadcast content. In August 2013, the FCC issued a Public Notice seeking comment on whether it should modify its indecency policies. The FCC has not yet issued a decision in this proceeding and the courts remain free to review the FCC’s current policy or any modifications thereto. The outcomes of these proceedings could affect future FCC policies in this area, and we are unable to predict the outcome of any such judicial proceeding, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The FCC’s duopoly restrictions limit our ability to own and operate multiple television stations in the same market.
The FCC’s ownership rules generally prohibit us from owning or having “attributable interests” in two television stations that are located in the same market when one of the stations is ranked among the top-four stations in the market unless eight independently owned, full-power stations will remain in the market. In November 2017, the FCC released an order that eliminated or relaxed several long-standing media ownership rules. However, in November 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated these rule changes and reinstated the prior, more restrictive, ownership rules. The Supreme Court of the United States granted the FCC’s petition for certiorari seeking review of the Third Circuit decision. The case was argued before the Supreme Court on January 19, 2021. In December 2018, the FCC launched a new proceeding to consider whether further changes in the media ownership rules were necessary. The FCC also considers television Local Marketing Agreements (“LMAs”) (which are agreements under which a television station sells or provides more than 15% of the programming on another same-market television station) as “attributable interests.” With the previous ownership rules in effect, our ability to expand in our present markets through additional station acquisitions or LMAs may be constrained.
The FCC’s National Television Station Ownership Rule limits the maximum number of households we can reach.
Under the FCC’s National Television Station Ownership Rule, a single television station owner may not reach more than 39% of United States households through commonly owned television stations, subject to a 50% discount of the number of television households attributable to UHF stations (the “UHF Discount”). In December 2017, the FCC issued an NPRM seeking comment on whether it should modify or eliminate the national cap, including the UHF Discount. This rule may constrain our ability to expand through additional station acquisitions. Currently our station portfolio reaches approximately 24% of total United States television households, or approximately 17% of total United States television households, after applying the UHF discount.
The Company is subject to governmental oversight regarding compliance with antitrust law as well as related civil litigation.
Various governmental agencies, including the DOJ, have authority to enforce the antitrust laws of the United States in the broadcast television industry. The DOJ has increased its enforcement activities within the industry. For example, in November 2018, the DOJ filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against six broadcasters, including Raycom, alleging an agreement to exchange competitively sensitive information. The broadcasters and the DOJ entered into a settlement agreement, which, among other things, prohibits the defendant broadcasters from exchanging competitively sensitive information and impose certain compliance requirements. No party to the settlement agreement, including Raycom, admitted to any wrongdoing. In addition, following the public disclosure of the DOJ’s investigation, several putative class action lawsuits were filed against various broadcasters, including Gray, asserting claims related to those reflected in the DOJ settlement. These lawsuits have been consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for the purpose of coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings. We are unable to predict the outcome of these proceedings.
Risks Related to the Ownership of Our Equity Securities
The price and trading volume of our equity securities may be volatile.
The price and trading volume of our equity securities may be volatile and subject to fluctuations. Some of the factors that could cause fluctuation in the stock price or trading volume of our equity securities include:
● | general market and economic conditions and market trends, including in the television broadcast industry and the financial markets generally; |
● | the political, economic and social situation in the United States; |
● | actual or anticipated variations in operating results, including audience share ratings and financial results; |
● | inability to meet projections in revenue; |
● | announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, capital commitments or other business developments; |
● | technological innovations in the television broadcast industry; |
● | adoption of new accounting standards affecting our industry; |
● | operations of competitors and the performance of competitors’ common stock; |
● | litigation or governmental action involving or affecting us or our subsidiaries; |
● | changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts; |
● | recruitment or departure of key personnel; |
● | purchases or sales of blocks of our common |
| operating and stock performance of the |
There can be no assurance that the price of our equity securities will not fluctuate or decline significantly. The stock market in recent years has experienced considerable price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of individual companies and that could adversely affect the price of our equity securities, regardless of our operating performance. Stock price volatility might be worse if the trading volume of shares of our equity securities is low. Furthermore, stockholders may initiate securities class action lawsuits if the market price of our equity securities were to decline significantly, which may cause us to incur substantial costs and could divert the time and attention of our management.
We do not currently pay cash dividends on our common stock or Class A common stock. To the extent a potential investor ascribes value to a dividendpaying stock, the value of our stock may be correspondingly reduced.
Our Board of Directors has not declared a cash or stock dividend on either class of our common stock since 2008. The timing and amount of any future dividend is at the discretion of our Board of Directors, and they may be subject to limitations or restrictions in our 2019 Senior Credit Facility and other financing agreements we may be, or become, party to. We can provide no assurance when or if any future dividends will be declared on our common stock or Class A common stock. As a result, if and to the extent an investor ascribes value to a dividend paying stock, the value of our common stock or Class A common stock may be correspondingly reduced.
Anti-takeover provisions contained in our Restated Articles of Incorporation (“Articles”) and our Bylaws, as amended (“Bylaws”), as well as provisions of Georgia law, could impair a takeover attempt.
Our Articles and Bylaws may have the effect of delaying, deferring or discouraging a prospective acquirer from making a tender offer for our shares of common stock or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us. To the extent that these provisions discourage takeover attempts, they could deprive stockholders of opportunities to realize takeover premiums for their shares. Moreover, these provisions could discourage accumulations of large blocks of common stock, thus depriving stockholders of any advantages which large accumulations of stock might provide.
As a Georgia corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Georgia law, including Section 14-2-1132 of the Georgia Business Corporation Code. Section 14-2-1132 prevents some stockholders holding more than 10% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations unless the business combination was approved in advance by our Board of Directors or results in the stockholder holding more than 90% of our outstanding common stock.
Any provision of our Articles, our Bylaws or Georgia law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
We have the ability to issue additional preferred stock, which could affect the rights of holders of our common stock and Class A common stock.
Including the shares of preferred stock issued in the Raycom Merger, our Articles allow our Board of Directors to issue up to 20 million shares of preferred stock and set forth the terms of such preferred stock. The terms of any such preferred stock, if issued, may adversely affect the dividend and liquidation rights of holders of our common stock.
Holders of our Class A common stock have the right to 10 votes per share on all matters to be voted on by our stockholders and, consequently, the ability to exert significant influence over us.
As a result of the 10 to 1 voting rights of holders of our Class A common stock, these stockholders are expected to be able to exert significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including mergers and other material transactions, and may be able to cause or prevent a change in the composition of our Board of Directors or a change in control of our Company that could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of the Company and might ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.
Certainstockholdersorgroupsofstockholdershavetheabilitytoexertsignificantinfluenceoverus.
Hilton H. Howell, Jr., our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is the husband of Robin R. Howell, a member of our Board of Directors (collectively with other members of their family, the “Howell-Robinson Family”). As a result of their significant stockholdings and positions on the Board of Directors, the Howell-Robinson Family is able to exert significant influence over our policies and management, potentially in a manner which may not be consistent with the interests of our other stockholders.
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 2. PROPERTIES
We lease our principal executive offices in a building located at 4370 Peachtree Road, NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30319. We also lease various other offices that support our operations. See “Stations”, in Item 1. of this Form 10-K, for a listing of our television stations and their locations.
The types of properties required to support television stations include offices, studios, transmitter sites and antenna sites. A station’s studios are generally housed within its offices in each respective market. The transmitter sites and antenna sites are generally located in elevated areas to provide optimal signal strength and coverage. We own or lease land, offices, studios, transmitters and antennas in each of our markets necessary to support our operations in that market area. In some market areas, we also own or lease multiple properties, such as towers and/or signal repeaters (translators), to optimize our broadcast capabilities. To the extent that our properties are leased, and those leases contain expiration dates, we believe that those leases can be renewed, or that alternative facilities can be leased or acquired, on terms that are comparable, in all material respects, to our existing properties.
We believe our owned and leased properties are in good condition, and suitable for the conduct of our present business.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that any known legal proceedings or claims are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 12 “Commitments and Contingencies” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for a further discussion of our legal proceedings.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set forth below is certain information with respect to our executive officers as of February 19, 2021:
Hilton H. Howell, Jr., age 58, has served as our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since January 2, 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Howell served as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President from June 2013 to December 2018. Mr. Howell is a member of the Executive Committee of the Board, has been a Director since 1993, and served as the Vice Chairman of the Board from 2002 to April 2016 when he was appointed as Chairman. He served as our Executive Vice President from September 2002 to August 2008. In addition, he has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic American Corporation, an insurance holding company, from 1995 to 2001, and as Chairman of that company since February 2009. He has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire & Casualty Insurance Company since 1991. Mr. Howell also serves as a Director of Atlantic American Corporation and of each of its subsidiaries, American Southern Insurance Company, American Safety Insurance Company and Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company, as well as a Director of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. He is the husband of Mrs. Robin R. Howell, who is a member of our Board of Directors. Previously, Mr. Howell served as a board member of the National Association of Broadcasters and the NBC Affiliate Board.
Donald P. LaPlatney, age 61, has served as our President and Co-Chief Executive Officer since January 2, 2019. Prior to that, from July 2016 until the closing of the Raycom Merger, he served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Raycom, and served as member on their Board of Directors. Before that, he served as Chief Operating Officer of Raycom from April 2014 to July 2016, as Senior Vice President, Digital Media from April 2012 until April 2014, and as Vice President, Digital Media from August 2007 to April 2012. Prior to joining Raycom in 2007, Mr. LaPlatney held various executive positions at The Tube Media Corp., Westwood One, and Raycom Sports. In addition, Mr. LaPlatney serves as a board member of Circle and the National Association of Broadcasters. He also serves as Chairman of the NBC Affiliate Board.
James C. Ryan, age 60, has served as our Chief Financial Officer since October 1998 and as Executive Vice President since February 2016. Prior to that, he was our Senior Vice President from September 2002 to January 2016 and our Vice President from October 1998 to August 2002.
Kevin P. Latek, age 50, has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Legal and Development Officer since February 2016. Prior to that, he served as our Senior Vice President, Business Affairs since July 2013 and as our Vice President for Law and Development from March 2012 to June 2013. Prior to joining Gray, Mr. Latek practiced law in Washington, DC representing television and radio broadcasters and financial institutions in FCC regulatory and transactional matters. He is a member and officer of the CBS Affiliates Board and a past member of the FOX Affiliates Board of Governors. Mr. Latek serves as a board member of Circle.
Robert L. Smith, age 58, has served as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2019. Prior to that, he served as our Co-Chief Operating Officer from February 2016 to December 2018 and as our Senior Vice President from July 2013 to January 2016. He is a past director of the Wisconsin Broadcaster’s Board, and a member of the Madison Chamber of Commerce and the Rockford Chamber of Commerce.
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock, no par value, and our Class A common stock, no par value, have been listed and traded on the NYSE since September 24, 1996 and June 30, 1995, respectively, under the symbols “GTN” and “GTN.A,” respectively.
As of February 19, 2021, we had 88,223,962 outstanding shares of common stock held by 23,632 stockholders and 7,214,838 outstanding shares of Class A common stock held by 366 stockholders. The number of stockholders consists of stockholders of record and individual participants in security position listings as furnished to us pursuant to Rule 17Ad-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
For matters submitted to a shareholder vote, our restated articles of incorporation provide that each share of common stock is entitled to one vote, and each share of Class A common stock is entitled to 10 votes. Our restated articles of incorporation require that our common stock and our Class A common stock receive dividends on a pari passu basis when declared.
The 2019 Senior Credit Facility and our indentures each contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay cash dividends on our capital stock. We have not paid dividends on either class of our common stock since October 15, 2008.
Any future payments of dividends will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant. See Note 4 “Long-term Debt” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for a further discussion of restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.
On January 2, 2019, we issued 650,000 shares of Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”), with a stated face value of $1,000 per share, as a portion of the consideration paid in the Raycom Merger. No placement or underwriting fees were paid in connection with the issuance of the Preferred Stock. Shares of the Preferred Stock accrue dividends on the face value in (A) cash at a rate of 8% per annum or, (B) at the Company’s option, in-kind at a rate of 8.5% per annum. The holders of the Preferred Stock do not have any right to exchange or convert these shares into any of our other securities. In addition, on January 2, 2019, we issued 11.5 million shares of our common stock at a price of $14.74 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day preceding the Raycom Merger. No placement or underwriting fees were paid in connection with the issuance of these shares. The issuance of these shares to legacy Raycom shareholders was made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as specified by the Rule 144A safe harbor, as the common stock was issued to Raycom shareholders in a privately negotiated transaction not involving any public offering or solicitation. The shares of our common stock issued to certain legacy Raycom shareholders, upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, have been registered for resale with the SEC on a selling stockholder shelf registration statement on Form S-3, file no. 333-229162.
Stock Performance Graph
The following stock performance graphs and related disclosures do not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate them by reference therein.
The following graphs compare the cumulative total return of theour common stock and the Class A common stock from January 1, 20132016 to December 31, 2017,2020, as compared to the stock market total return indexes for (i) The New York Stock Exchange Composite Index (the “NYSE Composite Index”) and (ii) The New York Stock Exchange Television Broadcasting Stations Index (the “TV Broadcasting Stations Index”).
The graphs assume the investment of $100 in each of our common stock and the Class A common stock, respectively, the NYSE Composite Index and the TV Broadcasting Stations Index on January 1, 2013.2016. Any dividends are assumed to have been reinvested as paid.
* $100 invested on 1/1/2013 in stock index, including reinvestment of dividends. Year ending December 31.
As of | As of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company/Index/Market | 1/1/2013 | 12/31/2013 | 12/31/2014 | 12/31/2015 | 12/31/2016 | 12/31/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/1/2016 | 12/31/2016 | 12/31/2017 | 12/31/2018 | 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gray Television, Inc. common stock | $ | 100 | $ | 676 | $ | 509 | $ | 741 | $ | 493 | $ | 761 | $ | 100 | $ | 67 | $ | 103 | $ | 90 | $ | 132 | $ | 110 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NYSE Composite Index | $ | 100 | $ | 126 | $ | 135 | $ | 129 | $ | 145 | $ | 172 | $ | 100 | $ | 112 | $ | 133 | $ | 121 | $ | 152 | $ | 162 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TV Broadcasting Stations Index | $ | 100 | $ | 160 | $ | 183 | $ | 200 | $ | 211 | $ | 219 | $ | 100 | $ | 105 | $ | 109 | $ | 109 | $ | 143 | $ | 171 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/1/2016 | 12/31/2016 | 12/31/2017 | 12/31/2018 | 12/31/2019 | 12/31/2020 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gray Television, Inc. Class A common stock | $ | 100 | $ | 76 | $ | 105 | $ | 97 | $ | 145 | $ | 122 | ||||||||||||
NYSE Composite Index | $ | 100 | $ | 112 | $ | 133 | $ | 121 | $ | 152 | $ | 162 | ||||||||||||
TV Broadcasting Stations Index | $ | 100 | $ | 105 | $ | 109 | $ | 109 | $ | 143 | $ | 171 | ||||||||||||
Issuer Purchases of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock
On November 5, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150 million of our outstanding common stock or our Class A common stock through December 31, 2022 (the “2019 Repurchase Authorization”). The 2019 Repurchase Authorization superseded all prior repurchase authorizations and prohibits the Company from purchasing shares directly from the Company’s officers, directors, or the Gray Television, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan (“401k Plan”).
On December 15, 2019, we entered into an Issuer Repurchase Plan (the “2019 IRP”), under Rules 10b-18 and 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The purpose of the 2019 IRP was to facilitate the orderly repurchase of our common stock through the establishment of the parameters for repurchases of our shares. During 2020, under this plan, we purchased 905,836 shares of our common stock at an average purchase price of $11.02 per share, excluding commissions, for a total cost of approximately $10 million, after which the 2019 IRP was terminated in the second quarter of 2020.
Subsequent to the termination of the 2019 IRP, we repurchased an additional 3,688,022 shares of our common stock, for a total cost of approximately $51 million at an average purchase price of $13.81 per share, excluding commissions. As of December 31, 2020, approximately $68 million was available to repurchase shares of our common stock and/or Class A common stock under the 2019 Repurchase Authorization.
On November 4, 2020, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to an additional $150 million of outstanding common stock and/or Class A common stock through December 31, 2023 (the “2020 Repurchase Authorization”). During 2020, under this plan, we repurchased 864,026 shares of our common stock, for a total cost of approximately $14 million at an average purchase price of $16.47 per share, excluding commissions. As of December 31, 2020, approximately $136 million was available to repurchase shares of our common stock and/or Class A common stock under the 2020 Repurchase Authorization.
Together, the capacity under our repurchase authorizations totals $204 million. Future share repurchases would be implemented through purchases made from time to time in either the open market or private transactions in accordance with applicable securities law requirements, including Rule 10b5-1. The extent to which we repurchase any of our shares, the number of shares and the timing of any repurchases will depend on general market conditions, regulatory requirements, alternative investment opportunities and other considerations. We are not required to repurchase a minimum number of shares, and the repurchase authorizations may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice.
The following table summarizes repurchases of our common stock in the three-months ended December 31, 2020 under our repurchase authorizations:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid per Share (2) | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans | Maximum Number of Shares (or Approximate Dollar Value) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (3) | ||||||||||||
October 1, 2020 through October 31, 2020: | - | $ | - | - | $ | 79,957,722 | ||||||||||
November 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020: | 972,706 | $ | 16.41 | 972,706 | $ | 203,842,332 | ||||||||||
December 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020: | - | $ | - | - | $ | 203,842,332 | ||||||||||
Total | 972,706 | $ | - | 972,706 | ||||||||||||
| All shares purchased were shares of |
As of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company/Index/Market | 1/1/2013 | 12/31/2013 | 12/31/2014 | 12/31/2015 | 12/31/2016 | 12/31/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gray Television, Inc. Class A common stock | $ | 100 | $ | 742 | $ | 526 | $ | 786 | $ | 598 | $ | 825 | ||||||||||||
NYSE Composite Index | $ | 100 | $ | 126 | $ | 135 | $ | 129 | $ | 145 | $ | 172 | ||||||||||||
TV Broadcasting Stations Index | $ | 100 | $ | 160 | $ | 183 | $ | 200 | $ | 211 | $ | 219 | ||||||||||||
(2) | Amount excludes standard brokerage commissions. |
(3) | The amounts presented at each respective month-end include the remaining dollar value available to purchase common stock and/or our Class A common stock under the repurchase authorizations. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Set forth below isThe following table of selected historical consolidated financial information for Gray for and as of the end of, each of thefive years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013. The selected historical consolidated financial information presented below does2020, is not contain allnecessarily indicative of the information you should consider when evaluating Gray,results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and ourthe audited consolidated financial statements and relatedaccompanying notes included elsewhere herein. Various factors are expected to have an effect on our financial condition and resultsin Part II, Item 8 of operations in the future, including the ongoing integration of any acquired businesses. You should also read this selected historical consolidated financial information in conjunction with the information under “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except net income per share data) | (in millions, except net income per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations Data (1): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations Data (1): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 882,728 | $ | 812,465 | $ | 597,356 | $ | 508,134 | $ | 346,298 | $ | 2,381 | $ | 2,122 | $ | 1,084 | $ | 883 | $ | 812 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 291,226 | 234,139 | 140,057 | 153,773 | 83,880 | 752 | 478 | 389 | 290 | 234 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from early extinguishment of debt (2) | (2,851 | ) | (31,987 | ) | - | (5,086 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 261,952 | 62,273 | 39,301 | 48,061 | 18,288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income per common share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 3.59 | 0.87 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted | 3.55 | 0.86 | 0.57 | 0.82 | 0.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from early extinguishment of debt (3) | (12 | ) | - | - | (3 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders (4) | 358 | 127 | 211 | 262 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders (4), per common share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 3.73 | 1.28 | 2.39 | 3.59 | 0.87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted | 3.69 | 1.27 | 2.37 | 3.55 | 0.86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets (3) | $ | 3,260,857 | $ | 2,752,505 | $ | 2,078,018 | $ | 1,834,074 | $ | 1,283,018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt (including current portion) (3) | 1,837,428 | 1,756,747 | 1,220,084 | 1,217,750 | 825,581 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 992,897 | 492,861 | 429,274 | 216,192 | 174,010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 7,643 | $ | 6,972 | $ | 4,213 | $ | 3,261 | $ | 2,753 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, including current portion | 3,974 | 3,697 | 2,549 | 1,837 | 1,757 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 1,753 | 1,464 | 1,187 | 993 | 493 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Our operating results fluctuate significantly between years, as a result of, among other things, our acquisition activity, and increased political advertising revenue |
(2) | Amounts in 2017 and 2016 have been reclassified to give effect to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-07, Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715) - Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. We adopted these standards as of January 1, 2018 and consequently, we reclassified our net pension expense (benefit) from our operating expenses to our miscellaneous income, net. The amount was not material. |
(3) | In 2020, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt related to the issuance of our 2030 Notes and the repurchase and redemption of our then-outstanding 5.125% senior notes due 2024. In 2017, we recorded a loss from early extinguishment of debt related to the amendment and restatement of our 2017 |
|
|
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Overview
Introduction. The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of Gray Television, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (except as the context otherwise provides, “Gray,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
This section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K discusses 2020 and 2019 items and year-over-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019. A detailed discussion of 2018 items and year-over-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018 that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Business Overview. We are a television broadcast company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, that ownsis the largest owner of top-rated local television stations and operatesdigital assets in the United States. We currently own and/or operate television stations and leading digital assetsproperties in markets throughout the United States. As of February 23, 2018, we owned and operated television stations in 5794 television markets broadcasting over 200 separate programming streams, including over 100 affiliatesthat collectively reach approximately 24% of the CBS, NBC, ABC and FOX networks.
In addition to a primary broadcast channel, each ofUS television households. During 2020, our stations can also broadcast additional secondary digital channels within a marketwere ranked first in average all-day ratings in 70 markets, and ranked first and/or second in 86 markets, as calculated by utilizing the same bandwidth, but with different programming from the primary channel. In addition to affiliations with ABC, CBS and FOX, our secondary channels are affiliated with numerous smaller networks and program services including, among others, the CW, MY, MeTV, This TV, Ant.,Telemundo, Cozi, Heroes and Icons and MOVIES! Networks. Certain of our secondary digital channels are affiliated with more than one network simultaneously.Comscore’s audience measurement service. We also broadcast local news/weather channels in some markets. Our combined TV station group reaches approximately 10.4%own video program production, marketing, and digital businesses including Raycom Sports, Tupelo-Raycom, and RTM Studios, the producer of total United States television households.Power Nation programs and content, which we refer to collectively as our “production companies.”
Our operating revenues are derived primarily from broadcast and internet advertising, retransmission consent feesfees and, to a lesser extent, other sources such as production of television and event programming, television commercials, tower rentals and management fees. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018, we generated revenue of $882.7 million, $812.5 million, $597.4 million,$2.4 billion, $2.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
Based on the consolidated results of the four Nielsen “sweeps” periods in 2017, our television stations achieved the #1 ranking in overall audience in 42 of our 57 markets and the #1 ranking in local news audience in 39 of our markets. In addition, our stations achieved the #1 or #2 ranking in both overall audience and news audience in all 57
Impact of COVID-19 global pandemic and Related Government Restrictions on our 57 markets. See “Business – Markets and Stations” elsewhereOperations. The impact of COVID-19 global pandemic and measures to prevent its spread are affecting our businesses in the Annual Report for a listingnumber of ways. We have experienced a disruption in creation of content that we broadcast on our television stations and their markets.
Recent Acquisitionsof events and Divestitures. Overprograms we produce at our production companies, including the last several years,cancellation of certain sports events and the shutting down of production of certain television broadcasting industry has been characterized by a high level of acquisition activity. We continue to believe that there are a number of television stations, and a few station groups, that have attractive operating profiles and characteristics, and that share our commitment to local news coverage in the communities in which they operate and to creating high-quality and locally-driven content. On a highly selective basis, we may pursue opportunities for the acquisition of additional television stations or station groups that fit our strategic and operational objectives, and where we believe that we can improve revenue, efficiencies and cash flow through active management and cost controls. As we consider potential acquisitions, we primarily evaluate potential station audience and revenue shares and theThe extent to which the acquisition target would positivelyCOVID-19 global pandemic impacts our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will depend on numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict or assess, including the duration and scope of the pandemic; the negative impact it has on global and regional economies and economic activity, changes in advertising customers and consumer behavior, impact of governmental regulations that might be imposed in response to the pandemic; its short and longer-term impact on the levels of consumer confidence; actions governments, businesses and individuals take in response to the pandemic; and how quickly economies recover after the COVID-19 global pandemic subsides. The COVID-19 global pandemic’s impact on the capital markets could impact our existing stationcost of borrowing.
We have been actively monitoring the global outbreak and spread of COVID-19 and taking steps to mitigate the risks posed by its spread and related circumstances and impacts. We are focused on navigating the challenges presented by the COVID-19 global pandemic through protecting the safety of our employees, seeking to maintain revenues, reducing expenses and delaying capital expenditures. There are certain limitations on our ability to mitigate the adverse financial impact of the pandemic, including the high fixed-cost nature of our businesses. The COVID-19 global pandemic also makes it more challenging for management to estimate future performance of our businesses, particularly over the near to medium term, and consequently the broader impact that it could have on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See “The novel coronavirus disease and its related diseases (“COVID-19”) global pandemic has had and is expected to continue to have an adverse impact on our business.” in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Since March 2020, most of our employees have been working from home, with only essential employees working on site. For employees working on site, we have instituted social distancing protocols, increased the level of cleaning and sanitizing in those sites and undertaken other actions to make these sites safer. We have reduced employee travel to only essential business needs. We are generally following the requirements and protocols published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization and state and local governments. We cannot predict when or how we will begin to curtail these efforts or lift these restrictions, including work from home requirements and travel restrictions. Currently, we do not believe our work from home protocol has adversely impacted our internal controls, financial reporting systems or our operations. Consistent
Impact of Coronavirus Relief Measures. In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted in March 2020. The CARES Act and related rules and guidelines include several significant provisions, including delaying certain payroll tax payments, mandatory transition tax payments, and estimated income tax payments that we are deferring to future periods. We do not expect the CARES Act to have a material impact on our financial condition, including on our estimated effective tax rate or our liquidity. We will continue to monitor and assess the impact that the CARES Act and all other current or future federal and state relief measures may have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Pending Acquisition of Quincy Media. On January 31, 2021, we entered into an agreement with, this strategy, from October 31, 2013 through December 31, 2017,among others, Quincy Media, Inc. (“Quincy”), to acquire all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Quincy for $925 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments, including, among other things, adjustments based on a determination of net working capital, cash, transaction expenses and indebtedness, as provided in the purchase agreement (the “Quincy Transaction”). Upon closing the Quincy Transaction, and net of divestitures required to meet regulatory requirements, we completed 23 acquisition transactions and three divestiture transactions. These transactions added a net total of 51will own television stations in 31serving 102 television markets that collectively will reach over 25% of US television households, including 26 newthe number-one ranked television station in 77 markets and the first and/or second highest ranked television station in 93 markets according to our operationsComscore’s average all-day ratings for calendar year 2020.
The completion of the Quincy Transaction is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain customary conditions, including, eight stations acquired in 2017 (excludingamong others: (i) the stations acquiredreceipt of approval from the FCC and the expiration or early termination of the waiting period applicable to the Quincy Transaction under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and (ii) the absence of certain legal impediments to the consummation of the Quincy Transaction. We believe that the Quincy Transaction will be completed during the second or third quarter of 2021. Either party may terminate the Quincy purchase agreement if the Quincy Transaction is not consummated on or before January 31, 2022, with an automatic extension to May 1, 2022, if necessary, to obtain regulatory approval under the circumstances specified in the Clarksburg Acquisition,Quincy purchase agreement. The purchase agreement includes a provision that we must pay a termination fee of $25 million if the “2017 Acquisitions”) and the 13 stations acquired in 2016 (including the stations acquired in the Clarksburg Acquisition, the “2016 Acquisitions”). See “Business – Stations” elsewhere in the Annual Report for a listing of our television stations and their markets and Note 2 “Acquisitions and Dispositions” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for additional information on our acquisitions and dispositions. Our total revenue and our broadcast operating expenses have increased significantlypurchase agreement is terminated as a result of our recent acquisitions.
Recent Financing Transactions. In connection with the consummation of our recent acquisitions and our effortsa failure to strengthen our balance sheet, we have undertaken several recent financing transactions. These transactions have included underwritten offerings of our common stock in March 2015 and December 2017; the repurchase and redemption ofsatisfy certain senior notes and the issuance of additional senior notes in 2016; and the refinancing of our senior credit facilities in 2016 and 2017. For a detailed description of these transactions please see Note 3 “Long-term Debt” and Note 5 “Stockholders’ Equity” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.regulatory approvals.
Revenues, Operations, Cyclicality and Seasonality. Our operating revenues are derived primarily from broadcast and internet advertising and retransmission consent fees and, to a lesser extent, from other sources such as production of commercials, tower rentals and management fees.
Broadcast advertising is sold for placement eithergenerally preceding or following a television station’s network programming and within local and syndicated programming. Broadcast advertising is sold in time increments and is priced primarily on the basis of a program’s popularity among the specific audience an advertiser desires to reach, as measured by Nielsen.reach. In addition, broadcast advertising rates are affected by the number of advertisers competing for the available time, the size and demographic makeup of the market served by the station and the availability of alternative advertising media in the market area. Broadcast advertising rates are generally the highest during the most desirable viewing hours, with corresponding reductions during other hours. The ratings of a local station affiliated with a major network can be affected by ratings of network programming. Most advertising contracts are short-term, and generally run only for a few weeks.
We also sell internet advertising on our stations’ websites.websites and mobile apps. These advertisements may be sold as banner advertisements, pre-rollvideo advertisements or video and other types of advertisements or sponsorships.
Our total revenue has increased significantly as a result of our recent acquisitions.
Our broadcast and internet advertising revenues are affected by several factors that we consider to be seasonal in nature. These factors include:
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
AutomotiveAutomotive advertisers have traditionally accounted for a significant portion of our revenue. ForDuring the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we derived approximately 25%21% and 22%,25% respectively, of our total broadcast advertising revenue (excluding political advertising revenue) from customers in the automotive industry. Strong demand for our advertising inventory from political advertisers can require significant use of available inventory, which in turn can lower our advertising revenue from our non-political advertising revenue categories in the even numbered “on-year” of the two yeartwo-year election cycle. These temporary declines are expected to reverse themselves in the odd numberedfollowing “off-year” of the two yeartwo-year election cycle.
While ourour total revenues have increased in recent years as a result of our acquisitions, they have also experienced a gradual improvementour revenue remains under pressure from the impact on the advertising market as a result of improvements in general economic conditions. However, revenue remains under pressurethe COVID-19 global pandemic and from the internet as a competitor for advertising spending. We have been taking steps to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 and we continue to enhance and market our internet websites in an effort to generate additional revenue. Our aggregate internet revenue is derived from both advertising and sponsorship opportunities directly on our websites.
Our primary broadcasting operating expenses are employee compensation, related benefits and programming costs. In addition, the broadcasting operations incur overhead expenses, such as maintenance, supplies, insurance, rent and utilities. A large portion of the operating expenses of our broadcasting operations is fixed. We continue to monitor our operating expenses and seek opportunities to reduce them where possible.
Please see our “Results of Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” sections below for further discussion of our operating results.
Risk Factors. Factors. The broadcast television industry is reliantrelies primarily on advertising revenue and faces significant competition. For a discussion of certain other presently known, significant risk factors that may affect our business, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” included elsewhere herein.
Revenue
Set forth below are the principal types of revenue, less agency commissions, earned by us for the periods indicated and the percentage contribution of each to our total revenue (dollars in thousands)millions):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent | Percent | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | of Total | Amount | of Total | Amount | of Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Local (including internet/digital/mobile) | $ | 451,261 | 51.1% | $ | 403,336 | 49.6% | $ | 336,471 | 56.3% | ||||||||||||||||||
National | 118,817 | 13.5% | 98,351 | 12.1% | 81,110 | 13.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Political | 16,498 | 1.9% | 90,095 | 11.1% | 17,163 | 2.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retransmission consent | 276,603 | 31.3% | 200,879 | 24.7% | 151,957 | 25.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 19,549 | 2.2% | 19,804 | 2.5% | 10,655 | 1.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 882,728 | 100.0% | $ | 812,465 | 100.0% | $ | 597,356 | 100.0% | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Local (including internet/digital/mobile) | $ | 771 | 32.4 | % | $ | 898 | 42.3 | % | $ | 443 | 40.9 | % | ||||||||||||
National | 198 | 8.3 | % | 229 | 10.8 | % | 114 | 10.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Political | 430 | 18.1 | % | 68 | 3.2 | % | 155 | 14.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Retransmission consent | 867 | 36.4 | % | 796 | 37.5 | % | 355 | 32.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Production companies | 61 | 2.6 | % | 87 | 4.1 | % | - | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other | 54 | 2.2 | % | 44 | 2.1 | % | 17 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,381 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,122 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,084 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 20172020 (“2020 (“2017”) Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162019 (“2019 (“2016”)
Revenue. Total revenue increased $70.3approximately $259 million, or 9%12%, to $882.7 million$2.4 billion for 20172020 compared to 2016. Local2019, primarily as a result of increased political advertising revenue, due to 2020 being the “on-year” of the two-year election cycle and increases in retransmission consent revenue. Political advertising revenue increased approximately $47.9$362 million, or 12%,532% to $451.3$430 million. National advertisingRetransmission consent revenue increased by approximately $20.5$71 million or 21%,9% to $118.8 million. The 2017 Acquisitions and the 2016 Acquisitions had a significant impact on our revenues, together accounting for approximately $232.2 million of our total revenue in 2017, and with the 2016 Acquisitions accounting for $130.4 million of our revenues in 2016.
Excluding the revenue contributed by the 2017 Acquisitions and 2016 Acquisitions, our total revenue decreased by $31.6 million. This was primarily the result of a decrease in political advertising revenue of approximately $63.4 million due to 2017 being the off-year of the two-year election cycle. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in retransmission consent revenue of approximately $36.8$867 million primarily due to higher retransmission consent rates. LocalCombined, local and national advertising revenue declined as a resultdecreased by $158 million or 14% to $969 million and production company revenue decreased by $26 million to $61 million. We attribute these decreases primarily to the effects of the impact ofCOVID-19 global pandemic which has affected our customers and our sports and event programming. Local and national revenue from the broadcast of the 20172020 Super Bowl on our FOX-affiliated stations generatingwas approximately $0.6$3 million, of local and national advertising revenue, compared to $1.6$5 million that we earned from the broadcast of the 20162019 Super Bowl on our CBS-affiliated stations. Local and national advertising also declined because the year ended December 31, 2016 included approximately $8.2 million of revenue from the 2016 Olympic Games.
Broadcast operating expenses. expenses. Broadcast operating expenses (before depreciation, amortization and lossgain on disposal of assets) increased $82.0$15 million, or 17%1%, to $557.1 million$1.3 billion for 20172020, compared to 2016,2019. Compensation expenses decreased by approximately $9 million in 2020. Non-payroll broadcast operating expenses increased by approximately $24 million which included retransmission expense that increased by $76 million in 2020 consistent with the increased retransmission consent revenue. Bad debt expense decreased by approximately $8 million in 2020, due to increasesconsistency of the balance of accounts receivable and the related reserves, compared to the significant increase in compensation2019 related to balances acquired in the Raycom Merger. Broadcast transaction related expenses were not significant in 2020, compared to $45 million in 2019. We recorded broadcast non-cash stock-based amortization expense of $29.1$5 million in each of 2020 and 2019.
Production Company Operating Expenses. Production company operating expenses (before depreciation, amortization and gain on disposal of assets) decreased by approximately $22 million in 2020 to $52 million, compared to $74 million 2019. Compensation expenses decreased by $4 million, and non-compensation expense of $52.9 million. The 2017 Acquisitions and the 2016 Acquisitions accounted for approximately $135.6 million of our total broadcast operating expenses in 2017, and with the 2016 Acquisitions accounting for $74.6 million of our broadcast operating expenses in 2016.
Compensation expense increased in 2017 compared to 2016, primarily as a result of $28.5decreased by $18 million in additional costs resulting2020. These decreases were primarily from the addition of employees at the stations acquired in the 2017 Acquisitions and 2016 Acquisitions. Non-cash share based compensation expenses were $3.9 million in 2017 compared to $1.2 million in 2016.
The 2017 Acquisitions and 2016 Acquisitions contributed $32.6 milliondue to the increase in non-compensation expense when comparing 2017 to 2016. Excluding the impacteffects of the 2017 Acquisitions and the 2016 Acquisitions, network affiliation fees increased by $19.3 million related to our increased retransmission consent revenue under our affiliation agreements and business and professional services fees increased by $2.7 million, offset by service and other broadcast operating expense decreases of $3.7 million.COVID-19 global pandemic.
Corporate and administrative expenses. Corporate and administrative expenses (before depreciation, amortization and gain or loss on disposal of assets) decreased $8.8by $39 million, or 22%38%, to $31.5$65 million for 2017in 2020 compared to 2016. The2019. These decreases were the result of a decrease was due primarily to decreases of $8.5$33 million of transaction related expenses incurred in 2019 that did not re-occur in the current year. In addition, other corporate expenses decreased by a further $6 million in legal and other professional fees associated with decreases in acquisition activity in 2017. Compensation expenses decreased $1.5 million, or 9%, primarily as a result of decreases in incentive compensation.2020. We recorded corporate non-cash stock-based compensationamortization expense during 2017of $11 million in each of 2020 and 2016 of $4.4 million and $3.9 million, respectively.2019.
Depreciation. Depreciation. Depreciation of property and equipment totaled $52.0$96 million and $45.9$80 million for 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Depreciation expense increased due to purchases of property and equipment at our existing stations and additional property and equipment placed in service related to the 2017 Acquisitions and the full year impact of the assets acquired in the 2016 Acquisitions.stations.
Amortization of intangible assets. assets. Amortization of intangible assets totaled $25.1$105 million and $16.6$115 million for 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Amortization expense increaseddecreased primarily due to the amortization expense associated with the acquired finite-lived intangible assets in the 2017 Acquisitions and the full year impact of the assets acquired in the 2016 Acquisitions.prior years becoming fully amortized.
Gain or loss on disposal of assets, net. We reported gains on disposals of assets of $74.2 million and losses on disposals of assets of $0.3$29 million in the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively. On May 30, 2017, we tendered two of our broadcast licenses and made other modifications to our broadcast spectrum$54 million in 2019. These gains were primarily related to our participation inasset disposals from the FCC’s reverse auction for broadcast spectrum. Proceeds from this auction, whichFCC Repack process. During 2019, we received on August 7, 2017, were $90.8also recorded a gain of $19 million whilerelated to the combined costdivestiture of television stations to facilitate regulatory approval of the disposed assets was $13.1 million. We have deferred any related income tax obligations on a long-term basis.television stations acquired in 2019.
Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $2.0$36 million, or 2%16%, to $95.3$191 million for 20172020 compared to 2016. Interest expense decreased2019 due to a decreasedecreases in ourthe average interest rates offset, in part, by an increase in our average principal outstanding. Therates. During 2020, the average interest rate on our debt balances was 4.9% and 5.5% for 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our average debt balance was $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion during 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our average debt balance increased as a result of increased borrowings used to finance our acquisitions.
Loss from early extinguishment of debt. In the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a loss from early extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.9 million, related to the amendment and restatement of our senior credit facility. Infacility, excluding the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded a lossamortization of deferred financing costs, decreased to 3.0% from early extinguishment of debt of approximately $32.0 million, related to the tender offer and redemption of our 7½% senior notes due 2020.4.7% in 2019.
Income tax expense. Our effective income tax rate decreased to a net benefit of 35.5% for 2017 from an expense of 41.1% for 2016. The primary reason for the decrease was the impact of the enactment of the TCJA that was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The TCJA reduced the value of our deferred tax liabilities, with a credit to earnings for a reduction of those liabilities. Accordingly, we recorded an income tax benefit of $68.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to a tax provision of $43.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2016. The TCJA will materially affect our income tax obligations in 2018 and subsequent years. Among other things, the new law should result in a positive effect on our net earnings and earnings per share. It will also limit or eliminate certain deductions to which we have been entitled in past years and, in 2017.25% for 2020 from 30% for 2019. Our effective income tax rates differed from the statutory rate due to the following items:
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Statutory federal income tax rate | 35.0% | 35.0% | ||||||||||||||||
Current year permanent items | 1.2% | 1.7% | ||||||||||||||||
State and local taxes, net of federal taxes | 4.1% | 4.8% | ||||||||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance | (0.8% | ) | (0.1% | ) | ||||||||||||||
Reserve for uncertain tax positions | 0.4% | (0.7% | ) | |||||||||||||||
Rate change due to enactment of tax reform | (75.5% | ) | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||
Other items, net | 0.1% | 0.4% | ||||||||||||||||
Effective income tax rate | (35.5% | ) | 41.1% | |||||||||||||||
Statutory federal income tax rate | 21 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||
Current year permanent items | 1 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||
State and local taxes, net of federal taxes | 5 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance | 0 | % | (1 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Net operating loss carryback | (1 | )% | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other items, net | (1 | )% | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Effective income tax expense rate | 25 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015 (“2015”)
Revenue. Total revenue increased $215.1 million, or 36%, to $812.5 million for 2016 compared to 2015. Local advertising revenue increased approximately $66.9 million, or 20%, to $403.3 million. National advertising revenue increased approximately $17.2 million, or 21%, to $98.4 million. The 2016 Acquisitions and the seven television stations we acquired in 2015 (the “2015 Acquisitions”) had a significant impact on our revenues, together accounting for approximately $187.8 million of our total revenue in 2016 and with the 2015 Acquisitions accounting for approximately $23.2 million of our total revenue in 2015. Local and national advertising revenue in 2016 benefited from approximately $8.2 million earned from the broadcast of the 2016 Summer Olympic Games on our NBC-affiliated stations. There was no corresponding Olympic Games advertising revenue during 2015. In 2016, local and national advertising revenue included approximately $1.6 million of revenue from the broadcast of the 2016 Super Bowl on our CBS-affiliated stations, an increase of approximately $0.1 million from the $1.5 million of revenue from the broadcast of the 2015 Super Bowl on our NBC-affiliated stations.
Excluding the impact of the 2016 Acquisitions and the 2015 Acquisitions: local revenue decreased by $6.7 million and national revenue decreased by $6.2 million in 2016 compared to 2015, in part, as a result of inventory displacement resulting from increased political advertising revenue; retransmission consent revenue increased $12.8 million in 2016 compared to 2015, primarily due to increased subscriber rates; and political advertising revenue increased $50.1 million in 2016 compared to 2015, reflecting increased advertising from political candidates and special interest groups during the “on year” of the two-year election cycle.
Broadcast operating expenses. Broadcast operating expenses (before depreciation, amortization and loss on disposal of assets) increased $100.9 million, or 27%, to $475.1 million for 2016 compared to 2015, due to increases in compensation expense of $50.4 million and non-compensation expense of $50.5 million. The 2016 Acquisitions and the 2015 Acquisitions accounted for approximately $103.9 million of our total broadcast operating expenses in 2016 and with the 2015 Acquisitions accounting for approximately $12.5 million of our total broadcast operating expenses in 2015.
Compensation expense increased by $50.4 million in 2016 compared to 2015, primarily as a result of $49.1 million in additional costs resulting primarily from the addition of employees at the 2016 Acquisitions and 2015 Acquisitions. Non-cash share based compensation expenses were $1.2 million in 2016 compared to $0.9 million in 2015.
The 2016 Acquisitions and 2015 Acquisitions contributed $42.3 million to the increase in non-compensation expense in 2016. Excluding the impact of the 2016 Acquisitions and the 2015 Acquisitions: network affiliation fees increased by $12.5 million related to our increased retransmission consent revenue under our affiliation agreements; national sales representation fees decreased $10.2 million as a result of the termination of our national advertising sales representation agreements effective January 1, 2016; business and professional services fees increased by $2.3 million; service, repair and maintenance expenses increased by $1.3 million; syndicated programming expenses increased by $1.2 million; and software licensing fees increased by $1.1 million.
Corporate and administrative expenses. Corporate and administrative expenses (before depreciation, amortization and loss on disposal of assets) increased $6.0 million, or 17%, to $40.3 million for 2016 compared to 2015. The increase was due primarily to $5.1 million in increased legal and other professional fees associated with our acquisitions. We recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense during 2016 and 2015 of $3.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Depreciation. Depreciation of property and equipment totaled $45.9 million and $36.7 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Depreciation expense increased due to purchases of property and equipment at our existing stations and additional property and equipment placed in service related to the 2016 Acquisitions and the full year impact of the assets acquired in the 2015 Acquisitions.
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets totaled $16.6 million and $12.0 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Amortization expense increased in 2016 compared to 2015 due to the amortization expense associated with the acquired finite-lived intangible assets in the 2016 Acquisitions and the full year impact of the assets acquired in the 2015 Acquisitions.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased $22.8 million, or 31%, to $97.2 million for 2016 compared to 2015. Interest expense increased due to an increase in our average principal outstanding, partially offset by a decrease in our average interest rates. Our average debt balance was $1.6 billion and $1.2 billion during 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our average debt balance increased as a result of increased borrowings used to finance our acquisitions. The average interest rate on our debt balances was 5.5% and 5.8% for 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Loss from early extinguishment of debt. In connection with the completion of the tender offer and the redemption of our senior notes due 2020, we recorded a loss from early extinguishment of debt of approximately $32.0 million in 2016, consisting of tender offer premiums of $18.2 million, premiums related to the redemption of $9.1 million, the write off of unamortized deferred financing costs of $8.0 million and the payment of approximately $0.2 million in legal and other professional fees; reduced by the recognition of un-accreted net premium of $3.5 million.
Income tax expense. Our effective income tax rate increased to 41.1% for 2016 from 40.2% for 2015. Our effective income tax rates differed from the statutory rate due to the following items:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Statutory federal income tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
Current year permanent items | 1.7 | % | 1.8 | % | ||||||
State and local taxes, net of federal taxes | 4.8 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||||
Change in valuation allowance | (0.1 | %) | (0.6 | %) | ||||||
Reserve for uncertain tax positions | (0.7 | %) | (0.9 | %) | ||||||
Other items, net | 0.4 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||||
Effective income tax rate | 41.1 | % | 40.2 | % | ||||||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General. General. The following tables present data that we believe is helpful in evaluating our liquidity and capital resources (dollars in thousands)millions):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 180,015 | $ | 210,085 | $ | 106,719 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (349,799 | ) | (479,334 | ) | (206,382 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 306,994 | 497,120 | 166,212 | |||||||||
Net increase in cash | $ | 137,210 | $ | 227,871 | $ | 66,549 | ||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||
Cash | $ | 462,399 | $ | 325,189 | ||||||||
Long-term debt including current portion | $ | 1,837,428 | $ | 1,756,747 | ||||||||
Borrowing availability under 2017 Senior Credit Facility | $ | 100,000 | $ | 60,000 | ||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 652 | $ | 385 | $ | 323 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (211 | ) | (2,656 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 120 | 1,064 | 681 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | $ | 561 | $ | (1,207 | ) | $ | 957 | |||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Cash | $ | 773 | $ | 212 | ||||
Long-term debt, less deferred financing costs | $ | 3,974 | $ | 3,697 | ||||
Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock | $ | 650 | $ | 650 | ||||
Borrowing availability under senior credit facility | $ | 200 | $ | 200 | ||||
RecentFinancing Transactions. We have undertaken several recent financing transactions in order to finance our acquisitions, reduce the interest rates of and extend the maturity datesOn October 19, 2020, we issued $800 million of our debt,2030 Notes and strengthen our balance sheet. These transactions have included underwritten offeringsused the net proceeds therefrom, after deducting transaction fees and estimated expenses, to redeem all of our common stockoutstanding 2024 Notes and to pay all fees and expenses in March 2015connection with the offering, including the redemption premium applicable to the 2024 Notes. We intend to use the remaining net proceeds to complete our pending acquisitions and December 2017;for general corporate purposes, which could include the repurchaserepayment of outstanding debt from time to time.
The interest rate and redemption of certain senior notes and issuance of additional senior notes in 2016;yield on the 2030 Notes is 4.75%. The 2030 Notes rank equally with the 2027 Notes and the refinancing of our senior credit facilities in 2016 and 2017. For a detailed description of these transactions please see Note 5 “Stockholders’ Equity” and Note 3 “Long-term Debt” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. For estimates of future principal2026 Notes. The 2030 Notes mature on October 15, 2030 and interest payments under our debt obligations, see “Tabular Disclosureis payable semiannually, on April 15 and October 15 of Contractual Obligations as of December 31, 2017” included elsewhere herein.each year.
Income Taxes.We file a consolidated federal income tax return and such state or local tax returns as are required based on our current forecasts. We expect to begin paying significant federal and state income taxes in 2018. We estimate that these income tax payments, net of refunds, will be within a range of approximately $40.0$21 million to $44.0 million.$23 million in 2021.
LiquidityDividend on common stock and Class A common stock. . We have $6.4 million in debt principal repayments due during 2018. We estimate that we will make approximately $117.5 million in debt interest payments, including accrued interestOn February 24, 2021, the Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $26.6 million as$0.08 per share of Decemberits common stock and Class A common stock. The first dividend is payable on March 31, 2017, and we will pay approximately $50.0 million for capital expenditures during the twelve months immediately following December 31, 2017. Although our cash flows from operations are subject2021, to a numberstockholders of risks and uncertainties, we anticipate that our cashrecord on hand, future cash expected to be generated from operations, borrowings from time to time under the 2017 Senior Credit Facility (or any such other credit facility as may be in place at the appropriate time) and, potentially, external equity or debt financing, will be sufficient to fund these debt service obligations and estimated capital expenditures. Any potential equity or debt financing would depend upon, among other things, the costs and availability of such financing at the appropriate time. We also presently believe that our future cash expected to be generated from operations and borrowing availabity under the 2017 Senior Credit Facility (or any such other credit facility) will be sufficient to fund our future capital expenditures and long-term debt service obligations until at least February 7, 2024, which is the maturity date of the term loan under the 2017 Senior Credit Facility.March 15, 2021.
Net Cash ProvidedBy (Used In)(Used In) Operating, Investing and Financing Activities – 2017 2020Compared to 20162019
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $30.1increased $267 million to $180.0$652 million in 20172020 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $210.1$385 million in 2016.2019. The decreaseincrease in cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to the net impact of several factors including;including: an increase in net income of $199.7$231 million; a net increase of $71 million in non-cash expenses; and a decrease of $206.5 million in non-cash expenses and a decrease of $23.3$35 million due to changes in working capital balances. The primary changes in our non-cash expenses included: a decrease in our deferred income taxes due to the impact of the TCJA of approximately $118.7 million; a decrease in the loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $29.1 million; and a gain on disposal of assets of approximately $74.5 million.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $129.5 million$2.4 billion to $349.8$211 million for 20172020 compared to $479.3 million$2.7 billion for 2016.2019. The net decrease was due primarily to a net decrease$2.8 billion of $32.4 million in cash used to acquire televisionfinance our acquisitions of businesses and licenses andin 2019. In 2020, we completed only $91 million of acquisition transactions. Other significant changes in 2020 compared to 2019 included the receipt in 2019 of $253 million in proceeds from the saledivestiture of television stations to facilitate regulatory approval of our acquisitions of businesses and licenses, a decrease of $9.1 million in cash used for the purchase of property and equipment and $90.8 million of proceeds received from the FCC Spectrum Auction in 2017.2019.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $307.0 million in 2017 compared to $497.1 million in 2016. This decrease of $190.1 million was due primarily to decreased borrowings to finance our acquisition activity in 2017 compared to 2016, partially offset by the impact of cash provided by our underwritten offering of 17.25 million shares of our common stock, at a price to the public of $14.50 per share, which resulted in net proceeds of approximately $238.9 million. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2017 was primarily from our December 2017 underwritten public offering and borrowings of $85.0 million, reduced by $6.2 million of quarterly principal payments under the 2017 Term Loan. We used $5.0 million of cash for deferred financing costs primarily related to the 2017 Senior Credit Facility. Also, in 2017 we used $4.0 million to repurchase shares of our common stock and made $1.8 million in payments for taxes related to net share settlements of equity awards. Cash provided by financing activities in 2016 was provided primarily from: $425.0 million of borrowings under the 2016 Term Loan, net of $8.7 million of deferred loan costs; the issuance of an aggregate of $700.0 million of 2026 Notes, net of $11.1 million of deferred loan costs, a portion of which was used to repay the outstanding balance of the 2016 Term Loan; and the issuance of $525.0 million of 2024 Notes at par, net of $8.1 million of deferred loan costs. A portion of the proceeds from the offering of the 2026 Notes and the 2024 Notes were used to fund the tender offer and redemption of the 2020 Notes, which included $27.5 million in premiums. Also in 2016 we used $2.0 million to repurchase shares of our common stock and made $1.5 million in payments for taxes related to net share settlements of equity awards.
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating, Investing and Financing Activities - 2016 Compared to 2015
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $103.4 million to $210.1 million in 2016 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $106.7 million in 2015. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to an increase in net income of $23.0 million, an increase of $65.1 million in non-cash expenses and an increase of $15.3 million due to changes in working capital balances.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $272.9 million to $479.3 million for 2016 compared to $206.4 million for 2015 due primarily to increased cash used to acquire television businesses and licenses.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $497.1$120 million in 20162020 compared to net cash provided by financing activities$1.1 billion in 2019. This decrease of $166.2 million in 2015. This change of $330.9$944 million was due primarily to our refinancing activitiesthe borrowings of $1.4 billion in 2016. Cash provided byterm loan financing activities in 2016 was primarily from: $425.0 million of borrowings under the 2016 Term Loan, net of $8.7 million of deferred loan costs; the issuance of $500.0 million of 2026 Notes, net of $7.8 million of deferred loan costs,to fund a portion of which was used to repay the outstanding balancecash consideration of the 2016 Term Loan; theRaycom Merger in 2019 compared to issuance of the additional $200.0$800 million of 2026our 2030 Notes at 103%in 2020. During 2020, we redeemed our 2024 Notes in the amount of par, resulting in net proceeds$525 million. During 2019, we made total payments of $206.0$211 million netto reduce the balance outstanding of $3.3our 2019 Term Loan. Also during 2020, we used $75 million of deferred loan costs; and the issuance of $525.0 million of 2024 Notes at par, net of $8.1 million of deferred loan costs. The net proceeds from the offering of the additional 2026 Notes and the 2024 Notes, and cash from operations, were used to fund the tender offer and redemption of the 2020 Notes, which included $27.5 million in premiums. Also, in 2016 we used $2.0 million to repurchase shares of our common stock and made $1.5compared to $32 million in payments for taxes2019. During 2020, we used $52 million of cash to pay dividends on our Series A Perpetual Preferred stock, compared to $39 million in 2019. During 2020, we paid $14 million of deferred loan costs related to net share settlements of equity awards. During 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of 13.5the 2030 Notes compared to $50 million sharesrelated the refinancing of our common stock at a price to the public of $13.00 per share. The net proceeds of the offering were $167.3 million, after deducting underwriting discounts2019 Senior Credit facility and expenses. Also,2027 Notes in 2015 we made $1.1 million in payments for taxes related to net share settlements of equity awards.2019.
Retirement Plans
We sponsor and contribute to defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans. Our defined benefit pension plan is the Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan (the “Gray Pension Plan)Plan”). Monthly plan benefitsBenefits under the Gray Pension Plan are frozen and can no longer increase, and no new participants can be added to the Gray Pension Plan.plan.
Our funding policy is consistent with the funding requirements of existing federal laws and regulations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. A discount rate is selected annually to measure the present value of the benefit obligations. In determining the selection of a discount rate, we estimated the timing and amounts of expected future benefit payments and applied a yield curve developed to reflect yields available on high-quality bonds. The yield curve is based on an externally published index specifically designed to meet the criteria of United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The discount rate selected for determining benefit obligations as of December 31, 20172020 was 3.55%2.38%, which reflects the results of this yield curve analysis. The discount rate used for determining benefit obligations as of December 31, 20162019 was 4.11%3.14%. Our assumptions regarding expected return on plan assets reflects asset allocations, the investment strategy and the views of investment managers, as well as historical experience. WeIn 2020, we use an assumed rate of return of 7.00%6.50% for our assets invested in the Gray Pension Plan. The estimated asset returns for this plan, calculated on a mean market value assuming mid-year contributions and benefit payments, were gainsa gain of 9.6% and 7.4%, respectively, in11.1% for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172020, and 2016.a loss of 17.6% for the year ended December 31, 2019. Other significant assumptions relate to inflation, retirement and mortality rates. Our inflation assumption is based on an evaluation of external market indicators. Retirement rates are based on actual plan experience and mortality rates are based on the RP-2014 Mortality TablePri-2012 total mortality table and the MP-2017 mortality improvementMP-2020 projection scale published by the Society of Actuaries.
During each of the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we contributed an aggregate of $3.1$3 million and $3.0 million, respectively, to the Gray Pension Plan, and we anticipate making an aggregate contribution of approximately $2.0$4 million to the Gray Pension Plan in 2018.2021. The use of significantly different assumptions, or if actual experienced results differ significantly from those assumed, could result in our funding obligations being materially different.
The Gray Television, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan (the “Capital Accumulation Plan”) is a defined contribution plan intended to meet the requirements of section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. EmployerBeginning in 2019, employer contributions under the Capital Accumulation Plan include matching cash contributions at a rate of 100% of the first 3%1% of each employee’s salary deferral, and 50% of the next 2%5% of each employee’s salary deferral. In addition, the Company, at its discretion, may make an additional profit sharingprofit-sharing contribution, based on annual Company performance, to those employees who meet certain criteria. DuringFor the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, we contributed an aggregate of $10.72019, our matching contributions to our Capital Accumulation Plan were approximately $13 million and $8.8$11, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we accrued contributions of approximately $6 million and $5 million respectively, toas discretionary profit-sharing contributions. Each of these discretionary profit-sharing contributions was subsequently made in the Capital Accumulation Plan.form of shares of our common stock.
See Note 811 “Retirement Plans” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for further information concerning the retirement plans.
Capital Expenditures
After the completion of the FCC’s Incentive Auction,In April 2017, the FCC has begunbegan the process of reallocating the broadcast spectrum (the “Repack”). Specifically, the FCC is requiring certain television stations to change channels and/or modify their transmission facilities. The FCC is required to reimburse stationsfacilities (“Repack”). Capital expenditures, including Repack, for reasonableeach of the 2020 and 2019 periods were $110 million. Excluding Repack, our capital expenditures were $87 million and $89 million, respectively. Our capitalized Repack costs to implement these changes at stations operating pursuant to a full power license. Twenty four of our current full power stations and four of our low power stations are affected by the Repack. Currently, we estimate that our total reimbursable cost for the Repack will be approximately $75.6 million. In addition to the reimbursable costs, we intend to make other changes2020 and improvements to our broadcast equipment and facilities that would have not been economically feasible if we2019 periods were not also purchasing equipment for the Repack project. We refer to these related but non-reimbursable capital expenditures as “Repack related.” Currently we estimate that the Repack related capital expenditures will be approximately $26.1 million. The process began in the summer of 2017 and will take approximately three years to complete. We anticipate that the majority of our costs associated with Repack will qualify for capitalization, rather than expense. In 2017, our Repack costs and associated reimbursements were $2.8$23 million and $0.1$21 million, respectively.
Capital expenditures for the years ended As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $34.5 million and $43.6 million, respectively.2020, the amount requested from the FCC for Repack, but not yet received, was approximately $7 million. Excluding Repack, but including Repack related expenditures, we expect that our capital expenditures will be approximately $50.0$80 million in the year ending December 31, 2018. We expect to fund futureduring 2021. Additional capital expenditures with cash from operations, borrowings or other financing proceeds.for Repack during 2021 are expected to be approximately $7 million and we anticipate being reimbursed for the majority of these Repack costs. However, reimbursement may be received in periods subsequent to those in which they were expended.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Operating Commitments. We have various operating lease commitments for equipment, land and office space. We also have commitments for various syndicated television programs.
We have two types of syndicated television program contracts: first run programsprograms and off network reruns. First run programs are programs such as Wheel of Fortune and off network reruns are programs such as Seinfeld. First run programs have not been produced at the time the contract to air such programming is signed, and off network reruns have already been produced. For all syndicated television contracts, we record an asset and corresponding liability for payments to be made only for the current year of the first run programming and for the entire contract period for off network programming. Only an estimate of the payments anticipated to be made in the year following the balance sheet date of the first run contracts are recorded on the current balance sheet, because the programs for the later years of the contract period have not been produced or delivered.
The total license fee payable under a program license agreement allowing us to broadcast programs is recorded at the beginning of the license period and is charged to operating expense over the period that the programs are broadcast. The portion of the unamortized balance expected to be charged to operating expense in the succeeding year is classified as a current asset, with the remainder classifiedclassified as a non-current asset. The liability for license fees payable under program license agreements is classified as current or long-term, in accordance with the payment terms of the various license agreements.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations as of December 31, 20172020. The following table aggregates our material expected contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 20172020 (in thousands)millions):
Payment Due By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations recorded on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2017: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations (1) | $ | 1,860,234 | $ | 6,417 | $ | 12,834 | $ | 12,834 | $ | 1,828,149 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest (2) | 26,624 | 26,624 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Programming obligations currently accrued (3) | 19,513 | 15,236 | 4,277 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2017: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long term debt obligations (4): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash interest on 2017 Senior | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Facility | 137,038 | 22,820 | 44,946 | 44,019 | 25,253 | |||||||||||||||
Cash interest on 2026 Notes | 351,276 | 41,125 | 82,250 | 82,250 | 145,651 | |||||||||||||||
Cash interest on 2024 Notes | 182,738 | 26,906 | 53,813 | 53,813 | 48,206 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations (5) | 17,592 | 3,286 | 4,935 | 4,077 | 5,294 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations not currently accrued (6) | 3,887 | 3,887 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Programming obligations not currently accrued (7) | 39,767 | 6,214 | 30,901 | 2,201 | 451 | |||||||||||||||
Network affiliation agreements (8) | 579,836 | 176,669 | 270,371 | 132,796 | - | |||||||||||||||
Service and other agreements (9) | 3,605 | 2,856 | 749 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 3,222,110 | $ | 332,040 | $ | 505,076 | $ | 331,990 | $ | 2,053,004 | ||||||||||
Payment Due By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations recorded on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2020: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations (1) | $ | 4,035 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 595 | $ | 3,440 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest (2) | 37 | 37 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Accrued Preferred Stock dividends (3) | 13 | 13 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Programming obligations currently accrued (4) | 30 | 25 | 5 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations (5) | 85 | 11 | 18 | 15 | 41 | |||||||||||||||
Off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2020: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash interest on long term debt obligations (6): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash interest on 2019 Senior Credit Facility | 199 | 42 | 92 | 65 | - | |||||||||||||||
Cash interest on 2030 Notes | 367 | 30 | 76 | 76 | 185 | |||||||||||||||
Cash interest on 2027 Notes | 328 | 46 | 105 | 105 | 72 | |||||||||||||||
Cash interest on 2026 Notes | 209 | 22 | 82 | 82 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock dividends (7) | 247 | 39 | 104 | 104 | - | |||||||||||||||
Programming obligations not currently accrued (8) | 57 | 10 | 46 | 1 | - | |||||||||||||||
Network affiliation agreements (9) | 888 | 435 | 453 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Service and other agreements (10) | 83 | 20 | 30 | 22 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 6,578 | $ | 730 | $ | 1,011 | $ | 1,065 | $ | 3,772 | ||||||||||
(1) | “Long-term debt obligations” represent current and long-term principal payment obligations under the |
(2) | “Accrued interest” represents interest on long-term debt obligations accrued as of December 31, |
(3) | “Accrued Preferred Stock dividends” represents accrued dividends as of December 31, 2020, that were paid according to their terms on January 15, 2021. Please refer to Note 7 “Preferred Stock” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for further information. |
| “Programming obligations currently accrued” represents obligations for syndicated television programming whose license period has begun and the product is available. These amounts are recorded as liabilities as of the current balance sheet date. |
(5) | “ |
| “Cash interest on long-term debt obligations” consists of estimated interest expense on long-term debt excluding interest expense accrued as of December 31, |
|
|
| “ |
| |
| (8) | “Programming obligations not currently accrued” represent obligations for syndicated television programming whose license period has not yet begun or the product is not yet available. These amounts are not recorded as liabilities as of the current balance sheet date. |
| |
| (9) | “Network affiliation agreements” represent the fixed obligations under our current agreements with broadcast networks. Our network affiliation agreements expire at various dates primarily through December |
| |
| (10) | “Service and other agreements” represents minimum amounts payable for various non-cancelable contractual agreements for maintenance services and other professional services. |
Estimates of the amount, timing and future funding obligationsobligations under our pension plan include assumptions concerning, among other things, actual and projected market performance of plan assets, investment yields, statutory requirements and demographic data for pension plan participants. Pension plan funding estimates are therefore not included in the table above because the timing and amounts of funding obligations for all future periods cannot be reasonably determined. We expect to contribute approximately $2.0$4 million in total to our defined benefit pension plansplan during 2018.2021.
Inflation
The impact of inflation on operations has not been significant to date. However, there can be no assurance that a high rate of inflation in the future would not have an adverse effect on operating results, particularly since amounts outstanding under the 20172019 Senior Credit Facility incur interest at a variable rate.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make judgments and estimations that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those reported amounts. We consider our accounting policies relating to intangible assets and income taxes to be critical policies that require significant judgments or estimations in their application where variances may result in those judgments or estimations could make a significant differencedifferences to future reported results. Our policies concerning intangible assets and income taxes are disclosed below.
Annual Impairment Testing of Broadcast Licenses and Goodwill. Goodwill.We have determined that ourevaluate broadcast licenses are indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with the accounting guidance forand goodwill and other intangible assets, which require such assets to be tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often when certain triggering events occur. ForGoodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level.
In the first quarter of 2020, the COVID-19 global pandemic and measures to prevent its spread began to affect our businesses in a number of ways. In the first quarter of 2020, we concluded that the uncertainties surrounding this event were a triggering event that required us to evaluate whether or not it was more likely than not that the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets were impaired. Based upon our analysis of both qualitative and quantitative factors, we concluded that such assets were not impaired. We will continue to evaluate both the subjective and objective criteria that may cause us to re-evaluate this conclusion in the future.
In the performance of our annual broadcast license and reporting unit impairment assessments, we have elected to bypass the option of performing a qualitative assessment provisions and to performdetermine if it is more likely than not that the prescribed testing stepsrespective asset has been impaired. In 2020, we performed a qualitative assessment for goodwill on an annual basis.Neither55 of these asset types is amortized.
We test for impairment ofour broadcast licenses and goodwill on an annual basis on the last day36 of each fiscal year. We also testour reporting units. In 2019, we performed a qualitative assessment for impairment during any reporting period if certain triggering events occur. The two most recent impairment testing dates were December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Our annual impairment testing53 of our broadcast licenses and goodwill for each individual television station requires an estimation43 of our reporting units.
As part of this qualitative assessment we evaluate the fair valuerelative impact of each broadcast licensefactors that are specific to the reporting units as well as industry, regulatory, and macroeconomic factors that could affect the significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the entire television station,assets. We also consider the significance of the excess fair value over the carrying value reflected in prior quantitative assessments and the changes to the reporting units’ carrying value since the last impairment test.
If we conclude that it is more likely than not that a broadcast license or reporting unit is impaired, or if we elect not to perform the optional qualitative assessment, we perform the quantitative assessment which involves comparing the estimated fair value of the broadcast license or reporting unit to its respective carrying value.
For our annual broadcast licenses impairment test in 2020, we considerconcluded that it was more likely than not that all of our broadcast licenses that were evaluated were not impaired based upon our qualitative assessments. We elected to perform a reporting unit. Such estimates generally rely on analysesquantitative assessment for our remaining broadcast licenses and concluded that their fair values exceeded their carrying values. To estimate the fair value of public and private comparative sales data as well asour broadcast licenses, we utilize a discounted cash flow analyses that inherently require multiple assumptions relatingmodel assuming an initial hypothetical start-up operation maturing into an average performing station in a specific television market and giving consideration to other relevant factors such as the future prospectstechnical qualities of each individual television station including, but not limited to (i) expected long-term market growth characteristics; (ii) estimations regarding a station’s future expected viewing audience; (iii) station revenue shares within a market; (iv) future expected operating expenses; (v) coststhe broadcast license and the number of capital; and (vi) appropriate discount rates. We believe that the assumptions we utilize in analyzing potential impairment ofcompeting broadcast licenses and/or goodwill for each of our television stations are reasonable individually and in the aggregate. However, these assumptions are highly subjective and changes in any one assumption, or a combination of assumptions, could produce significant differences in the calculated outcomes.within that market.
For our annual goodwill impairment test in 2020, we concluded that it was more likely than not that goodwill was not impaired based upon our qualitative assessments for our reporting units. We elected to perform a quantitative assessment for our remaining reporting units and concluded that their fair values exceeded their carrying values. To estimate the fair value of our reporting units, we utilize a discounted cash flow model supported by a market multiple approach. We believe that a discounted cash flow analysis is the most appropriate methodology to test the recorded value of long-term assets with a demonstrated long-lived/enduring franchise value. We believe the results of the discounted cash flow and market multiple approaches provide reasonable estimates of the fair value of our reporting units because these approaches are based on our actual results and reasonable estimates of future performance, and also take into consideration a number of other factors deemed relevant by us including, but not limited to, expected future market revenue growth, market revenue shares and operating profit margins. We have historically used these approaches in determining the fair value of our reporting units. We also consider a market multiple approach to corroborate our discounted cash flow analysis. We believe that this methodology is consistent with the approach that anya strategic market participant would utilize if they were to value one of our television stations.
We believe we have made reasonable estimates and utilized appropriate assumptions to evaluate whether the fair values of our broadcast licenses and reporting units were less than their carrying values. If future results are not consistent with our assumptions and estimates, including future events such as a deterioration of market conditions or significant increases in discount rates, we could be exposed to impairment charges in the future. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of cash flows.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, theThe recorded value of our broadcastlicenses was $1.5$3.6 billion at each of December 31, 2020 and $1.3 billion, respectively.2019. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the recorded value of our goodwill was $611.1 million$1.5 billion and $485.3 million,$1.4 billion, respectively. We did not record anSee Note 13 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein, for the results of our annual impairment expense related to our broadcast licenses or goodwill during 2017, 2016 or 2015.
Prior to January 1, 2002, acquired broadcast licenses were valued attests for the date of acquisition using a residual method. The recorded value of these broadcast licenses as ofyears ended December 31, 20172020, 2019 and 2016 was approximately $341.0 million. Broadcast licenses acquired after December 31, 2001 were valued at the date of acquisition using an income method that assumes an initial hypothetical start-up operation. This change in methodology was due to a change in accounting requirements. The book value of these broadcast licenses as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $1.2 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively. Regardless of whether we initially recorded the value of our broadcast licenses using the residual or the income method, for purposes of testing for potential impairment we use the income method to estimate the fair value of our broadcast licenses.2018.
Valuation of Network Affiliation Agreements. We believe that the value of a television station is derived primarily from the attributes of its broadcast license rather than its network affiliation agreement. These attributes have a significant impact on the audience for network programming in a local television market compared to the national viewing patterns of the same network programming.
Certain other broadcasting companies have valued their stations on the basis that it is the network affiliation and not the other attributes of the station, including its broadcast license, which contributes to the operational performance of that station. As a result, we believe that these broadcasting companies allocate a significant portion of the purchase price for any station that they may acquire to the network affiliation relationship and include in their network affiliation valuation amounts related to attributes which we believe are more appropriately reflected in the value of the broadcast license or reporting units.
The methodology we used to value theseour stations was based on our evaluation of the broadcast licenses acquired and the characteristics of the markets in which they operated. Given our assumptions and the specific attributes of the stations we acquired from 2002 through December 31, 2017,2020, we generally ascribe no incremental value to the incumbent network affiliation relationship in each market beyond the cost of negotiating a new agreement with another network and the value of any terms of the affiliation agreement that were more favorable or unfavorable than those generally prevailing in the market. Due to certain characteristics of a small number of the stations acquired in 2020 and 2019, we ascribed approximately $11 million and $50 million of the value of those transactions to network affiliations, respectively.
Some broadcast companies may use methods to value acquired network affiliations different than those that we use. These different methods may result in significant variances in the amount of purchase price allocated to these assets among broadcast companies.
If we were to assign higher values to all of our network affiliations and less value to our broadcast licenses or goodwill and if it is further assumed that such higher values of the network affiliations are finite-lived intangible assets, this reallocation of value might have a significant impact on our operating results. There is diversity of practice within the industry, and some broadcast companies have considered such network affiliation intangible assets to have a life ranging from 15 to 40 years depending on the specific assumptions utilized by those broadcast companies.
The following table reflects the hypothetical impact of the reassignment of value from broadcast licenses to network affiliations for our historical acquisitions (the first acquisition being in 1994) and the resulting increase in amortization expense assuming a hypothetical 15-year amortization period as of our most recent impairment testing date of December 31, 20172020 (in thousands,millions, except per share data):
Percentage of Total | Percentage of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Value Reassigned to | Value Reassigned to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Network | Network | |||||||||||||||||||||||
As | Affiliation Agreements | As | Affiliation Agreements | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reported | 50% | 25% | Reported | 50% | 25% | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet (As of December 31, 2017): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet (As of December 31, 2020): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcast licenses | $ | 1,530,703 | $ | 631,982 | $ | 1,081,342 | $ | 3,579 | $ | 1,842 | $ | 2,711 | ||||||||||||
Other intangible assets, net (including network affiliation agreements) | 73,784 | 406,811 | 240,297 | 395 | 1,487 | 941 | ||||||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(For the year ended December 31, 2017): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(For the year ended December 31, 2020): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 25,072 | 65,227 | 45,150 | 105 | 197 | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 291,226 | 251,071 | 271,148 | 752 | 660 | 706 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 261,952 | 237,457 | 249,704 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | 358 | 289 | 324 | |||||||||||||||||||||
per share - basic | $ | 3.59 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 3.42 | $ | 3.73 | $ | 3.01 | $ | 3.38 | ||||||||||||
per share - diluted | $ | 3.55 | $ | 3.22 | $ | 3.38 | $ | 3.69 | $ | 2.98 | $ | 3.34 | ||||||||||||
For future acquisitions, if any, the valuation of the network affiliations may differ from the values of previous acquisitions due to the different characteristics of each station and the market in which it operates.
Income Taxes. We have approximately $61.6 million in federal operating loss carryforwards, which will be fully utilized upon the filingAs of our 2017 tax returns. Additionally,December 31, 2020, we have an aggregate of approximately $101.7$204 million of various statefederal operating loss carryforwards.carryforwards that expire at various dates between the years 2023 through 2037. We project to have federal taxable income in the carryforward periods. Therefore, we believe that it is more likely than not that all of the federal operating loss carryforwards will be utilized. We have an aggregate of approximately $567 million of various state operating loss carryforwards. We expect to have state taxable income in the carryforward periods. Therefore, we believe that it is more likely than not that approximately half of the state operating loss carryforwards will be fully utilized.
A valuation allowance has been provided for a portion of the state net operating loss carryforwards. We believe that we will not meet the more likely than not threshold in certain states due to the uncertainty of generating sufficient income. Therefore, the state valuation allowance at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
The TCJA reduced the value of our deferred tax liabilities resulting in the recognition of a tax benefit of approximately $146.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 with a credit to earnings for a reduction of those liabilities. In addition, the TCJA contains significant changes to corporate taxes that will materially affect the taxes owed by us in 2018 and subsequent years. Among other things, the new law reduces the maximum federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, which should have a positive effect on our net earnings and earnings per share. It also includes an option to claim accelerated depreciation deductions on qualified property but limits or eliminates certain deductions to which we have been entitled in past years.
The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the TCJA. We have recognized the provisional tax impacts related primarily to depreciation deductions and included these amounts in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The ultimate impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions we have made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions we may take as a result of the TCJA. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed later in 2018.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.See Note 1“Description “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for more information.
Cautionary Statements for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Federal Securities Laws
This annual report on Form 10-K contains and incorporates by reference “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than those of historical fact. When used in this annual report, the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “will,” “may,” “should” and similar words and expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our then-current expectations and are based upon data available to us at the time the statements are made. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things, statements about our strategies, expected results of operations, general and industry-specific economic conditions, future pension plan contributions, future capital expenditures, future income tax payments, future payments of interest and principal on our long-term debt, assumptions underlying various estimates and estimates of future obligations and commitments and should be considered in context with the various other disclosures made by us about our business. Readers are cautioned that any forward-looking statements, including those regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of our management, are not guarantees of future performance, results or events and involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results and events may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including, but not limited to, those listed in Item 1A. of this Annual Report and the other factors described from time to time in our SEC filings. The forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain risks arising from business operations and economic conditions. We attempt to manage our exposure to a wide variety of business and operational risks principally through the management of our core business activities. We attempt to manage economic risk, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources and duration of our debt funding and, at times, the use of interest rate swap agreements. From time to time, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate exposure with the following objectives:
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
As of December 31, 2017,Under the 2019 Senior Credit Facility, we pay interest based on a floating interest rate on balances outstanding under the 2017 Senior Credit Facility.outstanding. We pay a fixed rate of interest on the 20262030 Notes, 2027 Notes and the 20242026 Notes. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the majority of our outstanding debt bore interest at a fixed interest rate, which reduces our risk of potential increases in interest rates, but would not allow us to benefit from any reduction in market interest rates such as LIBOR or the prime rate. Also, as of that date, we were not a party to any interest rate swap agreements. See Note 34 “Long-term Debt” toof our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for more information on our long-term debt and associated interest rates.
Based on our floating rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2017,2020, a 100 basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates would have increased or decreased our interest expense and decreased or increased our income before income taxes for the year ended December 31, 20172020 by approximately $6.4$18 million. The
At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the recorded amount of our long-term debt, including current portion, was $1.9$4.0 billion and $1.8$3.7 billion, respectively, and the fair value of our long-term debt, including current portion, was $1.9$4.1 billion and $1.8$3.9 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. Fair value of our long-term debt is based on estimates provided by third-party financial professionals as of the respective dates.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Page | |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, |
|
Consolidated Statements of |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
Management’sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the U.S.United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
In connection with the preparation of our annual consolidated financial statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO 2013 framework”). Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management excluded the operations of all of the television stations WBAY-TVacquired in Green Bay, Wisconsinthe Alaska Transactions, the Sioux Falls Transactions, the Columbus Transactions and KWQC-TV in Davenport, Iowa, each purchased from Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., KTVF-TV in Fairbanks, Alaska, from Tanana Valley Television Company and Tanana Valley Holdings, LLC, WDTV-TV in Clarksburg-Weston, West Virginia, from Withers Broadcasting Company of West Virginia, WABI-TV in Bangor, Maine and WCJB-TV in Gainesville, Florida, each from Community Broadcasting Service and Diversified Broadcasting, Inc., and WCAX-TV in Burlington, Vermont from Mt. Mansfield Television, Inc.,the Lubbock Transactions (together the “2020 Acquisitions”) from the assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2020. These operations were excluded in accordance with the SEC’s general guidance because they and the related entities were acquired in purchase business combinations in 2017.2020. Collectively, these operations accounted for approximately 14%1% of our total assets and 9%1% of our total revenues, as reported in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172020 has been audited by RSM US LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Gray Television, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Gray Television, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders'stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes and schedule (collectively, the financial statements). We also have audited the Company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded the operations of the television stations WBAY-TV in Green Bay, Wisconsin and KWQC-TV in Davenport, Iowa, each purchased from Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., KTVF-TV in Fairbanks, Alaska, from Tanana Valley Television Company and Tanana Valley Holdings, LLC, WDTV-TV in Clarksburg-Weston, West Virginia, from Withers Broadcasting Company of West Virginia, WABI-TV in Bangor, Maine and WCJB-TV in Gainesville, Florida, each from Community Broadcasting Service and Diversified Broadcasting, Inc., and WCAX-TV in Burlington, Vermont from Mt. Mansfield Television, Inc. (collectively, the Acquired Stations), from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, because they were acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination in 2017. We have also excluded the Acquired Stations from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. The Acquired Stations total assets and revenues represent approximately 14 percent and 9 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements and an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset and Goodwill Impairment Assessment
As described in Notes 1 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated broadcast licenses and goodwill balances were $3.6 billion and $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2020, respectively. Goodwill is allocated to the Company’s reporting units, which the Company identifies as each of its individual television markets and production companies. Goodwill, at the reporting unit level, and each broadcast license is tested for impairment at least annually. In the Company’s assessment of impairment, management identified those broadcast licenses and reporting units for which a qualitative assessment would be performed to determine whether it is more likely than not that the broadcast license or reporting unit is impaired. For those broadcast licenses and reporting units for which the Company did not elect to perform a qualitative analysis, the Company performed a quantitative analysis. To estimate the fair value of the reporting units using a quantitative assessment, the Company used a discounted cash flow model supported by a market multiple approach. The impairment assessment of each broadcast license and reporting unit requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to a number of factors under both the qualitative and quantitative assessments. The Company considered the relative impact of factors that are specific to the broadcast license and reporting unit such as industry, regulatory and macroeconomic factors as well as forecasts of future revenues, operating margins and discount rates. Management also utilized industry data such as third party market reports which project trends related to the growth of the industry. The Company has grown significantly through acquisition and as a result, many broadcast licenses and reporting units lack substantial historical operating performance data upon which to evaluate management’s forecasts.
We identified the broadcast license and goodwill impairment assessment as a critical audit matter because of the significant assumptions management used in the impairment analysis. Auditing management’s judgments used in the impairment assessment regarding industry, regulatory, and macroeconomic factors as well as forecasts of future revenue, operating margin, discount rate and its application of third party data related to industry growth involved a high degree of auditor judgment and increased audit effort, including the use of our valuation specialist.
Our audit procedures related to the Company’s broadcast license and goodwill impairment assessment included the following, among others:
● | We obtained an understanding of the relevant controls related to the Company’s goodwill and broadcast license impairment assessments, and tested such controls for design and operating effectiveness, including controls related to management’s review of the significant assumptions noted above. |
● | We tested management’s determination of which broadcast licenses and reporting units were subject to the qualitative impairment assessment versus those subject to a quantitative impairment assessment, including comparison of actual results to management’s historical forecasts. |
● | We tested management’s process for evaluating factors specific to the broadcast licenses and reporting units subject to qualitative goodwill impairment assessment. This included comparing the third party industry data utilized by management to other sources of independently obtained industry data. |
● | We tested management’s process for determining the fair value of the broadcast licenses and reporting units subject to quantitative goodwill impairment assessment. Due to the lack of historical experience available for broadcast licenses and reporting units acquired in the current year, we compared management’s forecasts of future revenue and operating margin to historical operating results for the Company’s similar existing reporting units, as well as third party, market specific industry data. |
● | We utilized our valuation specialist to assist in testing the discount rates for broadcast licenses and reporting units subject to a quantitative impairment assessment. |
/s/ RSM US LLP
We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 2006.
Atlanta, Georgia
February 27, 201825, 2021
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 462,399 | $ | 325,189 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,606 and $3,163, respectively | 171,230 | 146,811 | ||||||
Current portion of program broadcast rights, net | 14,656 | 13,735 | ||||||
Prepaid income taxes | 13,791 | 14,641 | ||||||
Prepaid and other current assets | 4,681 | 5,109 | ||||||
Total current assets | 666,757 | 505,485 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 350,658 | 326,093 | ||||||
Broadcast licenses | 1,530,703 | 1,340,305 | ||||||
Goodwill | 611,100 | 485,318 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net | 73,784 | 56,250 | ||||||
Investments in broadcasting and technology companies | 16,599 | 16,599 | ||||||
Other | 11,256 | 22,455 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 3,260,857 | $ | 2,752,505 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
GRAY TELEVISION, INC. | |||||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||||
(in |
December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 7,840 | $ | 5,257 | ||||
Employee compensation and benefits | 30,144 | 31,367 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 26,624 | 32,453 | ||||||
Accrued network programming fees | 20,317 | 14,982 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses | 11,970 | 13,802 | ||||||
Federal and state income taxes | 8,753 | 2,916 | ||||||
Current portion of program broadcast obligations | 15,236 | 13,924 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 4,004 | 4,706 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 6,417 | - | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 131,305 | 119,407 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion and deferred financing costs | 1,831,011 | 1,756,747 | ||||||
Program broadcast obligations, less current portion | 4,277 | 4,995 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 261,690 | 343,011 | ||||||
Accrued pension costs | 37,838 | 34,047 | ||||||
Other | 1,839 | 1,437 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 2,267,960 | 2,259,644 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, no par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued 88,788,664 shares and 71,229,497 shares, respectively outstanding 83,253,588 shares and 66,094,091 shares, respectively | 902,518 | 658,135 | ||||||
Class A common stock, no par value; authorized 15,000,000 shares, issued 8,349,069 shares and 8,073,993 shares, respectively outstanding 6,598,377 shares and 6,404,862 shares, respectively | 24,644 | 21,764 | ||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) | 161,694 | (101,365 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax benefit | (22,165 | ) | (17,645 | ) | ||||
| 1,066,691 | 560,889 | |||||||
Treasury stock at cost, common stock, 5,535,076 shares and 5,135,406 shares, respectively | (49,562 | ) | (44,688 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock at cost, Class A common stock, 1,750,692 shares and 1,669,131 shares, respectively | (24,232 | ) | (23,340 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 992,897 | 492,861 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 3,260,857 | $ | 2,752,505 | ||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 773 | $ | 212 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for credit losses of $10 and $11, respectively | 425 | 411 | ||||||
Current portion of program broadcast rights, net | 24 | 25 | ||||||
Income tax refunds receivable | 21 | 0 | ||||||
Prepaid and other current assets | 61 | 24 | ||||||
Total current assets | 1,304 | 672 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 737 | 725 | ||||||
Operating lease right of use asset | 57 | 50 | ||||||
Broadcast licenses | 3,579 | 3,573 | ||||||
Goodwill | 1,460 | 1,446 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net | 395 | 460 | ||||||
Investments in broadcasting and technology companies | 72 | 17 | ||||||
Other | 39 | 29 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 7,643 | $ | 6,972 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
GRAY TELEVISION, INC. | |||||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||||
(in millions, except for share data) |
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 10 | $ | 11 | ||||
Employee compensation and benefits | 53 | 67 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 37 | 37 | ||||||
Accrued network programming fees | 39 | 30 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses | 29 | 32 | ||||||
Federal and state income taxes | 20 | 13 | ||||||
Current portion of program broadcast obligations | 25 | 28 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 22 | 9 | ||||||
Dividends payable | 13 | 13 | ||||||
Current portion of operating lease liabilities | 7 | 6 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 255 | 246 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less deferred financing costs | 3,974 | 3,697 | ||||||
Program broadcast obligations, less current portion | 5 | 7 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 885 | 810 | ||||||
Accrued pension costs | 43 | 38 | ||||||
Operating lease liabilities, less current portion | 51 | 45 | ||||||
Other | 27 | 15 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 5,240 | 4,858 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) | ||||||||
Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock, no par value; cumulative; redeemable; designated 1,500,000 shares, issued and outstanding 650,000 shares at each date and $650 aggregate liquidation value, at each date | 650 | 650 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, no par value; authorized 200,000,000 shares issued 103,100,856 shares and 101,746,860 shares, respectively outstanding 88,140,259 shares and 92,658,362 shares, respectively | 1,110 | 1,093 | ||||||
Class A common stock, no par value; authorized 25,000,000 shares, issued 8,935,773 shares and 8,768,959 shares, respectively outstanding 7,048,006 shares and 6,881,192 shares, respectively | 34 | 31 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 862 | 504 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (39 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
| 1,967 | 1,597 | |||||||
Treasury stock at cost, common stock, 14,960,597 shares and 9,088,498 shares, respectively | (188 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock at cost, Class A common stock, 1,887,767 shares and 1,887,767 shares, respectively | (26 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 1,753 | 1,464 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 7,643 | $ | 6,972 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
GRAY TELEVISION, INC. | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | |||||||||||
(in |
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 882,728 | $ | 812,465 | $ | 597,356 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses before depreciation, amortization, and (gain) loss on disposals of assets, net: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcast | 557,116 | 475,131 | 374,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcasting | $ | 2,320 | $ | 2,035 | $ | 1,084 | ||||||||||||||||||
Production companies | 61 | 87 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue (less agency commissions) | 2,381 | 2,122 | 1,084 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses before depreciation, amortization, and gain on disposals of assets, net: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcasting | 1,340 | 1,325 | 596 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production companies | 52 | 74 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and administrative | 31,541 | 40,347 | 34,343 | 65 | 104 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 51,973 | 45,923 | 36,712 | 96 | 80 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 25,072 | 16,596 | 11,982 | 105 | 115 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposals of assets, net | (74,200 | ) | 329 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 591,502 | 578,326 | 457,299 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net | (29 | ) | (54 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses, net | 1,629 | 1,644 | 695 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 291,226 | 234,139 | 140,057 | 752 | 478 | 389 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous income, net | 162 | 775 | 103 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous (expense) income, net | (5 | ) | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (95,259 | ) | (97,236 | ) | (74,411 | ) | (191 | ) | (227 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loss from early extinguishment of debt | (2,851 | ) | (31,987 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (12 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 193,278 | 105,691 | 65,749 | 544 | 255 | 288 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense | (68,674 | ) | 43,418 | 26,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 134 | 76 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 261,952 | 62,273 | 39,301 | 410 | 179 | 211 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | 52 | 52 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 358 | $ | 127 | $ | 211 | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic per share information: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 3.59 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 3.73 | $ | 1.28 | $ | 2.39 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | 73,061 | 71,848 | 68,330 | 96 | 99 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Diluted per share information: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 3.55 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.57 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 3.69 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 2.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | 73,836 | 72,764 | 68,987 | 97 | 100 | 89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
GRAY TELEVISION, INC. | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | |||||||||||
(in |
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 261,952 | $ | 62,273 | $ | 39,301 | $ | 410 | $ | 179 | $ | 211 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income : | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to pension liability | (7,410 | ) | (592 | ) | 5,783 | (10 | ) | (7 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense | (2,890 | ) | (231 | ) | 2,255 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of ASU 2018-02 | 0 | (5 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income | (4,520 | ) | (361 | ) | 3,528 | (8 | ) | (10 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 257,432 | $ | 61,912 | $ | 42,829 | $ | 402 | $ | 169 | $ | 212 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
GRAY TELEVISION, INC. | |||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Treasury Stock | Treasury Stock | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Common Stock | Retained | Class A Common Stock | Common Stock | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Earnings | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | (Loss) Income | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 | 8,349,069 | $ | 25 | 88,788,664 | $ | 903 | $ | 162 | (1,750,692 | ) | $ | (24 | ) | (5,535,076 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 994 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | 0 | - | 0 | 210 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 210 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to pension liability, net of income tax | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards | 220,080 | 0 | 391,836 | 0 | 0 | (89,422 | ) | (2 | ) | (107,456 | ) | (2 | ) | 0 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock unit awards | 0 | 0 | 209,500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (82,201 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards | 0 | 0 | (91,057 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1,551,710 | ) | (19 | ) | 0 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | - | 2 | - | 5 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018 | 8,569,149 | $ | 27 | 89,298,943 | $ | 907 | $ | 372 | (1,840,114 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | (7,276,443 | ) | $ | (72 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 1,187 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | 0 | - | 0 | 179 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 179 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | - | 0 | - | 0 | (52 | ) | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | (52 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to pension liability, net of income tax | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions of television businesses and licenses | 0 | 0 | 11,499,945 | 170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 170 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401(k) Plan | 0 | 0 | 196,509 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards | 199,810 | 0 | 751,463 | 0 | 0 | (47,653 | ) | 0 | (152,371 | ) | (3 | ) | 0 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1,659,684 | ) | (32 | ) | 0 | (32 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | - | 4 | - | 12 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of ASU 2018-02 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 5 | - | 0 | - | 0 | (5 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | 8,768,959 | $ | 31 | 101,746,860 | $ | 1,093 | $ | 504 | (1,887,767 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | (9,088,498 | ) | $ | (107 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | $ | 1,464 | |||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
GRAY TELEVISION, INC. | |||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in |
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Retained | Class A | Common | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Common Stock | Earnings | Treasury Stock | Treasury Stock | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | (Deficit) | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | (Loss) Income | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 | 8,073,993 | $ | 21,764 | 71,229,497 | $ | 658,135 | $ | (101,365 | ) | (1,669,131 | ) | $ | (23,340 | ) | (5,135,406 | ) | $ | (44,688 | ) | $ | (17,645 | ) | $ | 492,861 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of ASU 2016-09 excess tax benefit for stock-based compensation | - | - | - | - | 1,107 | - | - | - | - | - | 1,107 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | - | 261,952 | - | - | - | - | - | 261,952 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to pension liability, net of income tax | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (4,520 | ) | (4,520 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underwritten public offering | - | - | 17,250,000 | 238,945 | - | - | - | - | �� | - | - | 238,945 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401(k) plan | - | - | 1,224 | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Long Term | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive Plan- restricted stock awards | 198,220 | - | 307,943 | - | - | (81,561 | ) | (892 | ) | (77,632 | ) | (874 | ) | - | (1,766 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan- restricted stock awards | 76,856 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (322,038 | ) | (4,000 | ) | - | (4,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | - | 2,880 | - | 5,423 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8,303 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 | 8,349,069 | $ | 24,644 | 88,788,664 | $ | 902,518 | $ | 161,694 | (1,750,692 | ) | $ | (24,232 | ) | (5,535,076 | ) | $ | (49,562 | ) | $ | (22,165 | ) | $ | 992,897 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Treasury Stock | Treasury Stock | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Common Stock | Retained | Class A Common Stock | Common Stock | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Earnings | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | (Loss) Income | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2019 | 8,768,959 | $ | 31 | 101,746,860 | $ | 1,093 | $ | 504 | (1,887,767 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | (9,088,498 | ) | $ | (107 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | 1,464 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | 0 | - | 0 | 410 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 410 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | - | 0 | - | 0 | (52 | ) | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | (52 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to pension liability, net of income tax | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | (8 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
401(k) Plan | 0 | 0 | 430,899 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Long Term Incentive Plan - stock options exercised | 0 | 0 | 274,746 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (154,935 | ) | (2 | ) | 0 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards | 166,814 | 0 | 359,481 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (146,716 | ) | (2 | ) | 0 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock unit awards | 0 | 0 | 374,500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (112,564 | ) | (2 | ) | 0 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards | 0 | 0 | (85,630 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (5,457,884 | ) | (75 | ) | 0 | (75 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | - | 3 | - | 13 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2020 | 8,935,773 | $ | 34 | 103,100,856 | $ | 1,110 | $ | 862 | (1,887,767 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | (14,960,597 | ) | $ | (188 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | 1,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
GRAY TELEVISION, INC. | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |||||||||||
(in |
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 261,952 | $ | 62,273 | $ | 39,301 | $ | 410 | $ | 179 | $ | 211 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 51,973 | 45,923 | 36,712 | 96 | 80 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 25,072 | 16,596 | 11,982 | 105 | 115 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred loan costs | 4,624 | 4,884 | 3,194 | 12 | 12 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of original issue discount and premium related to long-term debt, net | (610 | ) | (779 | ) | (863 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock and stock option awards | 8,303 | 5,099 | 4,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock awards | 16 | 16 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of program broadcast rights | 21,033 | 19,001 | 14,960 | 38 | 39 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Payments on program broadcast obligations | (21,055 | ) | (18,786 | ) | (14,576 | ) | (39 | ) | (43 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||||
Common stock contributed to 401(k) plan | 4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (77,325 | ) | 41,386 | 25,770 | 75 | 55 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposals of assets, net | (74,200 | ) | 329 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from early extinguishment of debt | 2,851 | 31,987 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net | (29 | ) | (54 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 12 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other | (3,343 | ) | (1,788 | ) | (2,542 | ) | 12 | 7 | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | (23,744 | ) | (6,107 | ) | (14,787 | ) | (14 | ) | 22 | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||
Prepaid income taxes | 851 | (14,642 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax receivable or prepaid | (21 | ) | 0 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other current assets | 806 | 2,032 | (3,705 | ) | (36 | ) | (7 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable | 2,116 | 518 | (141 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Employee compensation, benefits and pension costs | (1,899 | ) | 871 | 3,528 | (14 | ) | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
Accrued network fees and other expenses | 3,306 | (1,723 | ) | 13,789 | 7 | (41 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest | (5,829 | ) | 19,736 | (4,907 | ) | 0 | 3 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable | 5,836 | 2,145 | (1,123 | ) | 7 | (6 | ) | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue | (703 | ) | 1,130 | (3,972 | ) | 13 | 3 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 180,015 | 210,085 | 106,719 | 652 | 385 | 323 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investing activities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions of television businesses and licenses | (416,018 | ) | (431,846 | ) | (185,126 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of television station | - | 11,200 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from FCC spectrum auction | 90,824 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions of television businesses and licenses, net of cash acquired | (91 | ) | (2,837 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of television stations | 0 | 253 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (34,516 | ) | (43,604 | ) | (24,222 | ) | (110 | ) | (110 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from other asset sales | 187 | 2,979 | 3,115 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net decrease (increase) in acquisition prepayments and other | 9,724 | (18,063 | ) | (149 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from Repack reimbursement (Note 1) | 29 | 41 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from asset sales | 9 | 3 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in broadcast, production and technology companies | (48 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 0 | (6 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (349,799 | ) | (479,334 | ) | (206,382 | ) | (211 | ) | (2,656 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||||||||
Financing activities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings on long-term debt | 641,438 | 1,656,000 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of borrowings on long-term debt | (562,641 | ) | (1,100,000 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Payments for the repurchase of common stock | (4,000 | ) | (2,000 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Tender and redemption premiums for 2020 Notes | - | (27,502 | ) | �� | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 238,945 | - | 167,313 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings on long-term debt | 800 | 1,400 | 750 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt | (525 | ) | (211 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchases of common stock | (75 | ) | (32 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | (52 | ) | (39 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred and other loan costs | (4,981 | ) | (27,926 | ) | 4 | (22 | ) | (50 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards | (1,767 | ) | (1,452 | ) | (1,105 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 306,994 | 497,120 | 166,212 | 120 | 1,064 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in cash | 137,210 | 227,871 | 66,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash at beginning of period | 325,189 | 97,318 | 30,769 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash at end of period | $ | 462,399 | $ | 325,189 | $ | 97,318 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | 561 | (1,207 | ) | 205 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in restricted cash, included in non-current assets | 0 | 0 | 752 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and restricted cash at beginning of period | 212 | 1,419 | 462 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and restricted cash at end of period | $ | 773 | $ | 212 | $ | 1,419 |
| |||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
GRAY TELEVISION, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Description of Business.Overview. We are a television broadcast company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, that is the largest owner of top-rated local television (“television” or “TV”) stations and digital assets in the United States. Gray currently owns andand/or operates television stations and leading digital assetsproperties in markets throughout the United States. As of February 23, 2018, we owned and operated television stations in 5794 television markets broadcasting overthat collectively reach approximately 20024% separate programming streams,of U.S. television households. Over calendar year 2020, Gray’s stations were ranked first in 70 markets, and ranked first and/or second in 86 markets, as calculated by Comscore’s audience measurement service. We also own video program production, marketing, and digital businesses including over 100 affiliatesRaycom Sports, Tupelo-Raycom, and RTM Studios, the producer of the CBS Network, the NBC Network, the ABC NetworkPowerNation programs and the FOX Network. Wecontent, which we refer to these major broadcast networkscollectively as the “Big Four” networks.our “production companies.”
In addition to a primary broadcast channel, each of our stations can also broadcast additional secondary digital channels within a market by utilizing the same bandwidth, but with different programming from the primary channel. In addition to affiliations with ABC, CBS and FOX, our secondary channels are affiliated with numerous smaller networks and program services including, among others, the CW Network or the CW Plus Network, MY Network, the MeTV Network, This TV Network, Antenna TV, Telemundo, Cozi, Heroes and Icons and MOVIES! Network. Certain of our secondary digital channels are affiliated with more than one network simultaneously. We also broadcast local news/weather channels in some markets. Our combined TV station group reaches approximately 10.4% of total United States television households.
Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”). We consolidate a VIE when we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE for financial reporting purposes, we consider whether we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and whether we have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns that would be significant to the VIE.
On January 17, 2017, we acquired the assets of two television stations that were divested by Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. upon its merger with Media General, Inc. (“Media General”): WBAY-TV (ABC), in the Green Bay, Wisconsin television market (DMA 69), and KWQC-TV (NBC), in the Davenport, Iowa, Rock Island, Illinois, and Moline, Illinois or “Quad Cities” television market (DMA 102), for an adjusted purchase price of $269.9 million (the “Media General Acquisition”) using cash on hand. The Media General Acquisition was completed, in part, through a transaction with a VIE known as Gray Midwest EAT, LLC (“GME”), pursuant to which GME acquired the broadcast licenses of the stations. On May 30, 2017, we exercised an option to acquire the licenses held by GME pending receipt of proceeds from the FCC’s reverse auction for broadcast spectrum (the “FCC Spectrum Auction”). Upon receipt of the auction proceeds from the FCC on August 7, 2017, we completed the acquisition of the broadcast licenses from GME.
During the period that GME held those broadcast licenses we believe we were the primary beneficiary of GME because, subject to the ultimate control of the licensees, we had the power to direct the activities that significantly impact the economic performance of GME through the services we provided, and our obligation to absorb losses and right to earn returns that would be considered significant to GME. As a result, we included the assets, liabilities and results of operations of GME in our consolidated financial statements beginning January 17, 2017 and continuing through August 7, 2017, the date that we were no longer deemed to be the primary beneficiary of GME.
Investments in Broadcasting, Production and Technology Companies. Companies. We have an investmentinvestments in Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. (“Tarzian”) whose principal business is the ownershipseveral television, production and operation of two television stations. As of June 30, 2017, the most recent period for which we have Tarzian’s financial statements, our investment represented 32.4% of the total outstanding common stock of Tarzian (both in terms of the number of shares of common stock outstanding and in terms of voting rights), but such investment represented 67.9% of the equity of Tarzian for purposes of dividends, if paid, as well as distributions in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or other sale of Tarzian. This investment is accounted for under the cost method of accounting and reflectedtechnology companies. These investments are reported together as a non-current asset on our balance sheet. sheets.
We account for all material investments in which we own more than 50% of the voting securities or have no commitment to fund the operations of Tarzian nor do we have any representation on Tarzian’s board of directors or any othersignificant influence over Tarzian’s management.the investee under the equity method of accounting. Upon initial investment, we record equity method investments at cost. The amounts initially recognized are subsequently adjusted for our appropriate share of the net earnings or losses of the investee. We believerecord any investee losses up to the carrying amount of the investment plus advances and loans made to the investee, and any financial guarantees made on behalf of the investee. We recognize our share in earnings and losses of the investee as miscellaneous (expense) income, net in our consolidated statements of operations. Investments are also increased by contributions made to and decreased by the distributions from the investee. The Company evaluates equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may be impaired.
Investments in non-public businesses that do not have readily determinable pricing, and for which the Company does not have control or does not exert significant influence, are carried at cost method is appropriate to accountless impairments, if any, plus or minus changes in observable prices for this investment giventhose investments. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the existencecarrying value of a single majority voting stockholder andthese investments are included as miscellaneous (expense) income, net in our lackconsolidated statements of management influence or any obligation to fund the operations of Tarzian.operations.
In 2016, we made a $3.0 million strategic equity investment in Syncbak, a technology company that replicates over-the-air broadcasts
Tradeand Barter Transactions. We account for delivery over-the-toptrade transactions involving the exchange of tangible goods or services with our customers as revenue. The revenue is recorded at the time the advertisement is broadcast and the expense is recorded at the time the goods or services are used. The revenue and expense associated with these transactions is based on the fair value of the Internet. This investment doesassets or services involved in the transaction. Trade revenue and expense recognized for each of the years ended notDecember 31, 2020, 2019 represent a controlling interestand 2018 were as follows (amounts in Syncbak, nor are we committed to fund Syncbak’s operations. One member of our senior management holds a seat on Syncbak’s board of directors. millions):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Trade revenue | $ | 5 | $ | 8 | $ | 3 | ||||||
Trade expense | (5 | ) | (8 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||
Net trade income (loss) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
We do not account for barter revenue and related barter expense generated from network or syndicated programming as such amounts are not material. Furthermore, any such barter revenue recognized would then require the recognition of an equal amount of barter expense. The recognition of these amounts would not have a material effect upon net income.
Advertising Expense. Our advertising expense was $1 million, $2 million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We record as expense all advertising expenditures as they are incurred.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“United States GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Our actual results could differ materially from these estimated amounts. Our most significant estimates are our allowance for credit losses in receivables, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, amortization of program rights and intangible assets, pension costs, income taxes, employee medical insurance claims, useful lives of property and equipment and contingencies.
Allowance for Credit Losses. Our allowance for credit losses is equal to a portion of our receivable balances that are 120 days old or older. We may provide allowances for certain receivable balances that are less than 120 days old when warranted by specific facts and circumstances. We recorded expenses for this allowance of $2 million, $11 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We are exposed to credit risk primarily through sales of broadcast and digital advertising with a variety of direct and agency-based advertising customers, retransmission consent agreements with multichannel video program distributors and program production sales and services.
Our allowance for credit losses is an estimate of expected losses over the remaining contractual life of our receivables based on an ongoing analysis of collectability, historical collection experience, current economic and industry conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The allowance is calculated using a historical loss rate applied to the current aging analysis. We may also apply additional allowance when warranted by specific facts and circumstances. We generally write off account receivable balances when the customer files for bankruptcy or when all commonly used methods of collection have been exhausted.
We are closely monitoring the potential impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on the collectability of our receivables. As such, we did not adjust our allowance for credit loss as of December 31, 2020.
The following table provides a roll-forward of the allowance for credit losses. The allowance is deducted from the amortized cost basis of accounts receivable in our condensed consolidated balance sheets (in milions):
Year Ended | ||||
December 31, 2020 | ||||
Beginning balance | $ | 11 | ||
Provision for credit losses | 2 | |||
Amounts written off | (3 | ) | ||
Amounts recovered from previous write-offs | 0 | |||
Ending balance | $ | 10 | ||
Program Broadcast Rights. We have two types of syndicated television program contracts: first run programs and off network reruns. First run programs are programs such as Wheel of Fortune and off network reruns are programs such as Seinfeld. First run programs have not been produced at the time the contract to air such programming is signed, and off network rerun programs have already been produced. We record an asset and corresponding liability for payments to be made only for the current year of first run programming and for the entire contract period for off network programming. Only an estimate of the payments anticipated to be made in the year following the balance sheet date of first run program contracts are recorded on the current balance sheet, because the programs for the later years of the contract period have not been produced or delivered.
The total license fee payable under a program license agreement allowing us to broadcast programs is recorded at the beginning of the license period and is charged to operating expense over the period that the programs are broadcast. The portion of the unamortized balance expected to be charged to operating expense in the succeeding year is classified as a current asset, with the remainder classified as a non-current asset. The liability for license fees payable under program license agreements is classified as current or long-term, in accordance with the payment terms of the various license agreements.
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are carried at cost, or in the case of acquired businesses, at fair value. Depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method. The following table lists the components of property and equipment by major category (dollars in millions):
Estimated | |||||||||||||
December 31, | Useful Lives | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | (in years) | |||||||||||
Property and equipment, net: | |||||||||||||
Land | $ | 123 | $ | 119 | |||||||||
Buildings and improvements | 305 | 291 | 7 | to | 40 | ||||||||
Equipment | 834 | 776 | 3 | to | 20 | ||||||||
| 1,262 | 1,186 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (525 | ) | (461 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 737 | $ | 725 | |||||||||
Maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are charged to operations as incurred; major replacements and betterments are capitalized. The cost of any assets divested, sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts at the time of disposition, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income or expense for the period.
In April 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) began a process of reallocating the broadcast spectrum (the “Repack”). Specifically, the FCC is requiring certain television stations to change channels and/or modify their transmission facilities. The U.S. Congress passed legislation which provides the FCC with a $1.7 billion fund to reimburse all reasonable costs incurred by stations operating under a full power license and a portion of the costs incurred by stations operating under a low power license that are reassigned to new channels. Subsequent legislation in March 2018 appropriated an additional $1.0 billion for the Repack fund, of which up to $750 million may be made available to reimburse the Repack costs of full power, Class A television stations and multichannel video programming distributors. Other funds are earmarked to assist low power television stations and for other transition costs. The sufficiency of the FCC’s fund to reimburse for Repack costs is dependent upon a number of factors including the amounts to be reimbursed to other industry participants for Repack costs. Therefore, we cannot predict whether the fund will be sufficient to reimburse our Repack costs to the extent authorized under the legislation. 48 of our current full power stations and 37 of our current low power stations were affected by the Repack. The Repack process began in the summer of 2017 and we expect that it will conclude for nearly all of our stations during 2021. The majority of our costs associated with the Repack qualify for capitalization, rather than expense. Upon receipt of funds reimbursing us for our Repack costs, we record those proceeds as a component of our (gain) loss on disposal of assets, net.
The following tables provide additional information related to gain on disposal of assets, net included in our consolidated statements of operations and purchases of property and equipment included in our consolidated statements of cash flows (in millions):
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | $ | 9 | $ | 253 | $ | 9 | ||||||
Proceeds from Repack | 29 | 41 | 14 | |||||||||
Net book value of assets disposed | (9 | ) | (240 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 29 | $ | 54 | $ | 17 | ||||||
Purchase of property and equipment: | ||||||||||||
Recurring purchases - operations | $ | 87 | $ | 89 | $ | 41 | ||||||
Repack | 23 | 20 | 27 | |||||||||
Repack related | 0 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 110 | $ | 110 | $ | 70 | ||||||
Deferred Loan Costs. Loan acquisition costs are amortized over the life of the applicable indebtedness using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method. These debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are presented in our balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements are presented as an asset, and amortized over the life of the line-of-credit arrangement.
Asset Retirement Obligations. We own office equipment, broadcasting equipment, leasehold improvements and transmission towers, some of which are located on, or are housed in, leased property or facilities. At the conclusion of several of these leases we are obligated to dismantle, remove and otherwise properly dispose of and remediate the facility or property. We estimate our asset retirement obligations based upon the net present value of the cash flows of the costs expected to be incurred. Asset retirement obligations are recognized as a non-current liability and as a component of the cost of the related asset. Changes to our asset retirement obligations resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original undiscounted cash flow estimates are recognized as an increase or decrease in the carrying amount of the asset retirement obligation and the related asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the related property, plant or equipment. Changes in asset retirement obligations resulting from accretion of the net present value of the estimated cash flows are recognized as operating expenses. We recognize depreciation expense of the capitalized cost over the estimated life of the lease. Our estimated obligations are due at varying times through 2062. The liability recognized for our asset retirement obligations was approximately $2 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, expenses related to our asset retirement obligations were not material.
Concentration of Credit Risk. We sell advertising airtime on our broadcasts and advertising space on our websites to national and local advertisers within the geographic areas in which we operate. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition, and generally advance payment is not required, except for political advertising. Credit losses are provided for in the financial statements and consistently have been within our expectations that are based upon our prior experience.
Excluding political advertising revenue, which is cyclical based on election cycles, our most significant category of customer is automotive. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 approximately 21%, 25% and 25%, respectively, of our broadcast advertising revenue (excluding political advertising revenue) was obtained from advertising sales to automotive customers. Although our revenues can be affected by changes within our customer base, we believe this risk is in part mitigated due to the fact that noone customer accounted for in excess of 5% of our broadcast advertising revenue in any of these periods. Furthermore, we believe that our large geographic operating area partially mitigates the potential effect of regional economic impacts.
Earnings Per Share. We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant period. The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding does not include restricted shares. These shares, although classified as issued and outstanding, are considered contingently returnable until the restrictions lapse and, in accordance with United States GAAP, are not included in the basic earnings per share calculation until the shares vest. Diluted earnings per share is computed by including all potentially dilutive common shares, including restricted shares and shares underlying stock options, in the diluted weighted-average shares outstanding calculation, unless their inclusion would be antidilutive.
The following table reconciles basic weighted-average shares outstanding to diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic | 96 | 99 | 88 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares underlying stock options and restricted shares | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted | 97 | 100 | 89 | |||||||||
Valuation of Broadcast Licenses, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We have acquired a significant portion of our assets in acquisition transactions. Among the assets acquired in these transactions were broadcast licenses issued by the FCC, goodwill and other intangible assets.
For broadcast licenses acquired prior to January 1, 2002, we recorded their respective values using a residual method (analogous to “goodwill”) where the excess of the purchase price paid in the acquisition over the fair value of all identified tangible and intangible assets acquired was attributed to the broadcast license. This residual basis approach generally produces higher valuations of broadcast licenses when compared to applying an income method as discussed below.
For broadcast licenses acquired after December 31, 2001, we record their respective values using an income approach. Under this approach, a broadcast license is valued based on analyzing the estimated after-tax discounted future cash flows of the acquired station, assuming an initial hypothetical start-up operation maturing into an average performing station in a specific television market and giving consideration to other relevant factors such as the technical qualities of the broadcast license and the number of competing broadcast licenses within that market. For television stations acquired after December 31, 2001, we allocate the residual value of the station to goodwill.
When renewing broadcast licenses, we incur regulatory filing fees and legal fees. We expense these fees as they are incurred.
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of assets acquired, identifiable intangible assets, less liabilities assumed. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis (at year end) or between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying amount.
Other intangible assets that we have acquired include network affiliation agreements, retransmission agreements, advertising contracts, client lists, talent contracts and leases. Although each of our stations is affiliated with at least one broadcast network, we believe that the value of a television station is derived primarily from the attributes of its broadcast license rather than its network affiliation agreement. As a result, we allocate only minimal values to our network affiliation agreements. We classify our other intangible assets as finite-lived intangible assets. The amortization period of our other intangible assets is equal to the shorter of their estimated useful life or contract period, including expected extensions thereof. When renewing other intangible asset contracts, we incur legal fees that are expensed as incurred.
Impairment Testing of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets. We test for impairment of our indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis on December 31. However, if certain triggering events occur, we test for impairment when such events occur.
For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, each of our individual television markets or production companies is considered a separate reporting unit. In the performance of our annual assessment of goodwill for impairment, we have the option to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not a reporting unit has been impaired. As part of this qualitative assessment we evaluate the relative impact of factors that are specific to the reporting units as well as industry, regulatory, and macroeconomic factors that could affect the significant influenceinputs used to determine the fair value of the assets. We also consider the significance of the excess fair value over managementthe carrying value reflected in prior quantitative assessments and the changes to each reporting unit’s carrying value since the last impairment test.
If we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired, or operations,if we elect not to perform the optional qualitative assessment, we will determine the fair value of the reporting unit and as such,compare that to the net book value of the reporting unit. If the fair value is less than the net book value, we accountwill record an impairment to goodwill for the amount of the difference.
To estimate the fair value of our reporting units for a quantitative assessment, we utilize a discounted cash flow model supported by a market multiple approach. We believe that a discounted cash flow analysis is the most appropriate methodology to test the recorded value of long-term assets with a demonstrated long-lived/enduring franchise value. We believe the results of the discounted cash flow and market multiple approaches provide reasonable estimates of the fair value of our reporting units because these approaches are based on our actual results and reasonable estimates of future performance, and also take into consideration a number of other factors deemed relevant by us including, but not limited to, expected future market revenue growth, market revenue shares and operating profit margins. We have historically used these approaches in determining the value of our reporting units. We also consider a market multiple approach to corroborate our discounted cash flow analysis. We believe that this investmentmethodology is consistent with the approach that a strategic market participant would utilize if they were to value one of our reporting units.
In the performance of our annual assessment of broadcast licenses for impairment we have the option to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that these assets are impaired. When evaluating our broadcast licenses for impairment, the qualitative assessment is done at the individual television station level. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that one of our broadcast licenses is impaired, we will perform a quantitative assessment by comparing the fair value of the broadcast license to its carrying value. If the fair value is greater than the asset’s recorded value, no impairment expense is recorded. If the fair value does not exceed the asset’s recorded value, we record an impairment expense equal to the amount that the asset’s recorded value exceeded the asset’s fair value. We use the income method to estimate the fair value of all broadcast licenses irrespective of whether they were initially recorded using the cost methodresidual or income methods.
For further discussion of our goodwill, broadcast licenses and other intangible assets, see Note 13 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets.”
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. Our accumulated other comprehensive loss balances as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 consist of adjustments to our pension liabilities net of related income tax benefits as follows (in millions):
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Items included in accumulated other comprehensive loss: | ||||||||
Increase in pension liability | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (42 | ) | ||
Income tax benefit | (13 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | ||
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In January 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2020-01,Investments—Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) (ASU 2020-01). ASU 2020-01 clarifies the interaction of the accounting for equity securities under Topic 321, the accounting for equity method investments in Topic 323,and the accounting for certain forward contracts and purchased options in Topic 815. ASU 2020-01 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2022.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12,Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (ASU 2019-12), which is intended to simplify various areas related to the accounting for income taxes and improve consistent application of Topic 740. ASU 2019-12 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2022.
Adoption of Accounting Standard. On January 1, 2020, we adopted the amendments in ASU 2016-13,Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on a modified-retrospective basis with comparative periods reported in accordance with previous guidance. These amendments require the measurement of credit losses using historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Prior to this investment is reflected asadoption, our allowance for doubtful accounts was equal to a non-current assetportion of our receivable balances that were 120 days old or older. We generally provided allowances for certain receivable balances that were less than 120 days old when warranted by specific facts and circumstances. The adoption of the amendments in ASU 2016-13 did not have a material effect on our balance sheet. We evaluate this investment periodically for impairment.financial statements.
In addition to the accounting standards described above, certain amounts in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows have also been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
2. | Revenue |
Revenue RecognitionProperty and Equipment. Broadcast advertising revenueProperty and equipment are carried at cost, or in the case of acquired businesses, at fair value. Depreciation is generated primarilycomputed principally by the straight-line method. The following table lists the components of property and equipment by major category (dollars in millions):
Estimated | |||||||||||||
December 31, | Useful Lives | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | (in years) | |||||||||||
Property and equipment, net: | |||||||||||||
Land | $ | 123 | $ | 119 | |||||||||
Buildings and improvements | 305 | 291 | 7 | to | 40 | ||||||||
Equipment | 834 | 776 | 3 | to | 20 | ||||||||
| 1,262 | 1,186 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (525 | ) | (461 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 737 | $ | 725 | |||||||||
Maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are charged to operations as incurred; major replacements and betterments are capitalized. The cost of any assets divested, sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the saleaccounts at the time of disposition, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income or expense for the period.
In April 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) began a process of reallocating the broadcast spectrum (the “Repack”). Specifically, the FCC is requiring certain television advertising timestations to local, nationalchange channels and/or modify their transmission facilities. The U.S. Congress passed legislation which provides the FCC with a $1.7 billion fund to reimburse all reasonable costs incurred by stations operating under a full power license and political advertisers. Internet advertising revenuea portion of the costs incurred by stations operating under a low power license that are reassigned to new channels. Subsequent legislation in March 2018 appropriated an additional $1.0 billion for the Repack fund, of which up to $750 million may be made available to reimburse the Repack costs of full power, Class A television stations and multichannel video programming distributors. Other funds are earmarked to assist low power television stations and for other transition costs. The sufficiency of the FCC’s fund to reimburse for Repack costs is generated fromdependent upon a number of factors including the saleamounts to be reimbursed to other industry participants for Repack costs. Therefore, we cannot predict whether the fund will be sufficient to reimburse our Repack costs to the extent authorized under the legislation. 48 of advertisementsour current full power stations and 37 of our current low power stations were affected by the Repack. The Repack process began in the summer of 2017 and we expect that it will conclude for nearly all of our stations during 2021. The majority of our costs associated with the Repack qualify for capitalization, rather than expense. Upon receipt of funds reimbursing us for our stations’ websites. Advertising revenue is billed to the customer and recognized when the advertisement is broadcast or appears on our stations’ websites. Retransmission consent revenue consists of payments to us from cable, satellite and other multiple video program distribution systems for their retransmissionRepack costs, we record those proceeds as a component of our broadcast signals. Retransmission consent revenue is recognized as earned(gain) loss on disposal of assets, net.
The following tables provide additional information related to gain on disposal of assets, net included in our consolidated statements of operations and purchases of property and equipment included in our consolidated statements of cash flows (in millions):
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | $ | 9 | $ | 253 | $ | 9 | ||||||
Proceeds from Repack | 29 | 41 | 14 | |||||||||
Net book value of assets disposed | (9 | ) | (240 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 29 | $ | 54 | $ | 17 | ||||||
Purchase of property and equipment: | ||||||||||||
Recurring purchases - operations | $ | 87 | $ | 89 | $ | 41 | ||||||
Repack | 23 | 20 | 27 | |||||||||
Repack related | 0 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 110 | $ | 110 | $ | 70 | ||||||
Deferred Loan Costs. Loan acquisition costs are amortized over the life of the retransmission consent contract. Other revenue consists primarily of revenue earnedapplicable indebtedness using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method. These debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are presented in our balance sheets as a direct deduction from the productioncarrying amount of programmingthat debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements are presented as an asset, and payments from tower space rent. Revenue from the production of programming is recognized as the programming is produced. Tower rent is recognizedamortized over the life of the rental agreements.
Cash received that has not yet been recognized as revenue is presented as deferred revenue. Revenue that has been earned but not yet received is recognized as revenue and presented as a receivable.
line-of-credit arrangement.
Trade
and Barter TransactionsAsset Retirement Obligations. We account for trade transactions involvingown office equipment, broadcasting equipment, leasehold improvements and transmission towers, some of which are located on, or are housed in, leased property or facilities. At the exchangeconclusion of tangible goodsseveral of these leases we are obligated to dismantle, remove and otherwise properly dispose of and remediate the facility or services withproperty. We estimate our customers as revenue. The revenue is recorded atasset retirement obligations based upon the time the advertisement is broadcast and the expense is recorded at the time the goods or services are used. The revenue and expense associated with these transactions is based on the fairnet present value of the assetscash flows of the costs expected to be incurred. Asset retirement obligations are recognized as a non-current liability and as a component of the cost of the related asset. Changes to our asset retirement obligations resulting from revisions to the timing or services involvedthe amount of the original undiscounted cash flow estimates are recognized as an increase or decrease in the transaction. Trade revenuecarrying amount of the asset retirement obligation and the related asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the related property, plant or equipment. Changes in asset retirement obligations resulting from accretion of the net present value of the estimated cash flows are recognized as operating expenses. We recognize depreciation expense of the capitalized cost over the estimated life of the lease. Our estimated obligations are due at varying times through 2062. The liability recognized for each ofour asset retirement obligations was approximately $2 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019. During the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, 20162019 and 20152018, expenses related to our asset retirement obligations were as follows (amountsnot material.
Concentration of Credit Risk. We sell advertising airtime on our broadcasts and advertising space on our websites to national and local advertisers within the geographic areas in thousands):which we operate. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition, and generally advance payment is not required, except for political advertising. Credit losses are provided for in the financial statements and consistently have been within our expectations that are based upon our prior experience.
Excluding political advertising revenue, which is cyclical based on election cycles, our most significant category of customer is automotive. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 approximately 21%, 25% and 25%, respectively, of our broadcast advertising revenue (excluding political advertising revenue) was obtained from advertising sales to automotive customers. Although our revenues can be affected by changes within our customer base, we believe this risk is in part mitigated due to the fact that noone customer accounted for in excess of 5% of our broadcast advertising revenue in any of these periods. Furthermore, we believe that our large geographic operating area partially mitigates the potential effect of regional economic impacts.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Trade revenue | $ | 1,832 | $ | 2,069 | $ | 2,299 | ||||||
Trade expense | (1,863 | ) | (1,997 | ) | (2,188 | ) | ||||||
Net trade (loss) income | $ | (31 | ) | $ | 72 | $ | 111 | |||||
We do
Earnings Per Share. We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant period. The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding does not account for barter revenueinclude restricted shares. These shares, although classified as issued and related barter expense generated from network or syndicated programming as such amountsoutstanding, are considered contingently returnable until the restrictions lapse and, in accordance with United States GAAP, are not material. Furthermore, any such barter revenue recognizedincluded in the basic earnings per share calculation until the shares vest. Diluted earnings per share is computed by including all potentially dilutive common shares, including restricted shares and shares underlying stock options, in the diluted weighted-average shares outstanding calculation, unless their inclusion would then require the recognition of an equal amount of barter expense. be antidilutive.
The recognition of these amounts would not have a material effect upon net income.
Advertising Expense. Our advertising expense was $1.6 million, $1.5 million and $1.0 millionfollowing table reconciles basic weighted-average shares outstanding to diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, 20162019 and 2015,2018 respectively. (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic | 96 | 99 | 88 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares underlying stock options and restricted shares | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted | 97 | 100 | 89 | |||||||||
Valuation of Broadcast Licenses, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We have acquired a significant portion of our assets in acquisition transactions. Among the assets acquired in these transactions were broadcast licenses issued by the FCC, goodwill and other intangible assets.
For broadcast licenses acquired prior to January 1, 2002, we recorded their respective values using a residual method (analogous to “goodwill”) where the excess of the purchase price paid in the acquisition over the fair value of all identified tangible and intangible assets acquired was attributed to the broadcast license. This residual basis approach generally produces higher valuations of broadcast licenses when compared to applying an income method as discussed below.
For broadcast licenses acquired after December 31, 2001, we record their respective values using an income approach. Under this approach, a broadcast license is valued based on analyzing the estimated after-tax discounted future cash flows of the acquired station, assuming an initial hypothetical start-up operation maturing into an average performing station in a specific television market and giving consideration to other relevant factors such as the technical qualities of the broadcast license and the number of competing broadcast licenses within that market. For television stations acquired after December 31, 2001, we allocate the residual value of the station to goodwill.
When renewing broadcast licenses, we incur regulatory filing fees and legal fees. We expense all advertising expendituresthese fees as they are incurred.
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of assets acquired, identifiable intangible assets, less liabilities assumed. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis (at year end) or between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying amount.
Other intangible assets that we have acquired include network affiliation agreements, retransmission agreements, advertising contracts, client lists, talent contracts and leases. Although each of our stations is affiliated with at least one broadcast network, we believe that the value of a television station is derived primarily from the attributes of its broadcast license rather than its network affiliation agreement. As a result, we allocate only minimal values to our network affiliation agreements. We classify our other intangible assets as finite-lived intangible assets. The amortization period of our other intangible assets is equal to the shorter of their estimated useful life or contract period, including expected extensions thereof. When renewing other intangible asset contracts, we incur legal fees that are expensed as incurred.
Impairment Testing of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets. We test for impairment of our indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis on December 31. However, if certain triggering events occur, we test for impairment when such events occur.
For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, each of our individual television markets or production companies is considered a separate reporting unit. In the performance of our annual assessment of goodwill for impairment, we have the option to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not a reporting unit has been impaired. As part of this qualitative assessment we evaluate the relative impact of factors that are specific to the reporting units as well as industry, regulatory, and macroeconomic factors that could affect the significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the assets. We also consider the significance of the excess fair value over the carrying value reflected in prior quantitative assessments and the changes to each reporting unit’s carrying value since the last impairment test.
If we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired, or if we elect not to perform the optional qualitative assessment, we will determine the fair value of the reporting unit and compare that to the net book value of the reporting unit. If the fair value is less than the net book value, we will record an impairment to goodwill for the amount of the difference.
To estimate the fair value of our reporting units for a quantitative assessment, we utilize a discounted cash flow model supported by a market multiple approach. We believe that a discounted cash flow analysis is the most appropriate methodology to test the recorded value of long-term assets with a demonstrated long-lived/enduring franchise value. We believe the results of the discounted cash flow and market multiple approaches provide reasonable estimates of the fair value of our reporting units because these approaches are based on our actual results and reasonable estimates of future performance, and also take into consideration a number of other factors deemed relevant by us including, but not limited to, expected future market revenue growth, market revenue shares and operating profit margins. We have historically used these approaches in determining the value of our reporting units. We also consider a market multiple approach to corroborate our discounted cash flow analysis. We believe that this methodology is consistent with the approach that a strategic market participant would utilize if they were to value one of our reporting units.
In the performance of our annual assessment of broadcast licenses for impairment we have the option to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that these assets are impaired. When evaluating our broadcast licenses for impairment, the qualitative assessment is done at the individual television station level. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that one of our broadcast licenses is impaired, we will perform a quantitative assessment by comparing the fair value of the broadcast license to its carrying value. If the fair value is greater than the asset’s recorded value, no impairment expense is recorded. If the fair value does not exceed the asset’s recorded value, we record an impairment expense equal to the amount that the asset’s recorded value exceeded the asset’s fair value. We use the income method to estimate the fair value of all broadcast licenses irrespective of whether they were initially recorded using the residual or income methods.
For further discussion of our goodwill, broadcast licenses and other intangible assets, see Note 13 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets.”
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. Our accumulated other comprehensive loss balances as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 consist of adjustments to our pension liabilities net of related income tax benefits as follows (in millions):
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Items included in accumulated other comprehensive loss: | ||||||||
Increase in pension liability | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (42 | ) | ||
Income tax benefit | (13 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | ||
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In January 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2020-01,Investments—Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) (ASU 2020-01). ASU 2020-01 clarifies the interaction of the accounting for equity securities under Topic 321, the accounting for equity method investments in Topic 323, and the accounting for certain forward contracts and purchased options in Topic 815. ASU 2020-01 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2022.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12,Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (ASU 2019-12), which is intended to simplify various areas related to the accounting for income taxes and improve consistent application of Topic 740. ASU 2019-12 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2022.
UseAdoption of EstimatesAccounting Standard. On January 1, 2020, we adopted the amendments in ASU 2016-13,Financial Instruments-Credit LossesThe preparation (Topic 326): Measurement of financial statements in conformityCredit Losses on a modified-retrospective basis with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amountscomparative periods reported in accordance with previous guidance. These amendments require the financial statementsmeasurement of credit losses using historical experience, current conditions and accompanying notes. Our actual results could differ materially from these estimated amounts. Our most significant estimates arereasonable and supportable forecasts. Prior to this adoption, our allowance for doubtful accounts in receivables, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, amortization of program rights and intangible assets, pension costs, income taxes, employee medical insurance claims, useful lives of property and equipment and contingencies.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Our allowance for doubtful accounts iswas equal to a portion of our receivable balances that arewere 120 days old or older. We may providegenerally provided allowances for certain receivable balances that arewere less than 120 days old when warranted by specific facts and circumstances. We recorded expenses for this allowanceThe adoption of $2.4 million, $1.9 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, amendments in ASU 2016 and -2015,13 respectively. We generally write off accounts receivable balances when the customer files for bankruptcy or when all commonly used methods of collection have been exhausted.
Program Broadcast Rights. We have two types of syndicated television program contracts: first run programs and off network reruns. First run programs are programs such as Wheel of Fortune and off network reruns are programs such as Seinfeld. First run programs havedid not have a material effect on our financial statements.
In addition to the accounting standards described above, certain amounts in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows have also been produced at the time the contractreclassified to air such programming is signed, and off network rerun programs have already been produced. We record an asset and corresponding liability for paymentsconform to be made only for the current year of first run programming and for the entire contract period for off network programming. Only an estimate of the payments anticipated to be made in the year following the balance sheet date of first run program contracts are recorded on the current balance sheet, because the programs for the later years of the contract period have not been produced or delivered.presentation.
The total license fee payable under a program license agreement allowing us to broadcast programs is recorded at the beginning of the license period and is charged to operating expense over the period that the programs are broadcast. The portion of the unamortized balance expected to be charged to operating expense in the succeeding year is classified as a current asset, with the remainder classified as a non-current asset. The liability for license fees payable under program license agreements is classified as current or long-term, in accordance with the payment terms of the various license agreements.
2. | Revenue |
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are carried at cost.cost, or in the case of acquired businesses, at fair value. Depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method. The following table lists the components of property and equipment by major category (dollars in millions):
Estimated | |||||||||||||
December 31, | Useful Lives | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | (in years) | |||||||||||
Property and equipment, net: | |||||||||||||
Land | $ | 123 | $ | 119 | |||||||||
Buildings and improvements | 305 | 291 | 7 | to | 40 | ||||||||
Equipment | 834 | 776 | 3 | to | 20 | ||||||||
| 1,262 | 1,186 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (525 | ) | (461 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 737 | $ | 725 | |||||||||
Maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are charged to operations as incurred; the purchase of new assets, major replacements and betterments are capitalized. The cost of any assets divested, sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts at the time of disposition, and any resulting profitgain or loss is reflected in income or expense for the period.
In April 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) began a process of reallocating the broadcast spectrum (the “Repack”). Specifically, the FCC is requiring certain television stations to change channels and/or modify their transmission facilities. The U.S. Congress passed legislation which provides the FCC with a $1.7 billion fund to reimburse all reasonable costs incurred by stations operating under a full power license and a portion of the costs incurred by stations operating under a low power license that are reassigned to new channels. Subsequent legislation in March 2018 appropriated an additional $1.0 billion for the Repack fund, of which up to $750 million may be made available to reimburse the Repack costs of full power, Class A television stations and multichannel video programming distributors. Other funds are earmarked to assist low power television stations and for other transition costs. The sufficiency of the FCC’s fund to reimburse for Repack costs is dependent upon a number of factors including the amounts to be reimbursed to other industry participants for Repack costs. Therefore, we cannot predict whether the fund will be sufficient to reimburse our Repack costs to the extent authorized under the legislation. 48 of our current full power stations and 37 of our current low power stations were affected by the Repack. The Repack process began in the summer of 2017 and we expect that it will conclude for nearly all of our stations during 2021. The majority of our costs associated with the Repack qualify for capitalization, rather than expense. Upon receipt of funds reimbursing us for our Repack costs, we record those proceeds as a component of our (gain) loss on disposal of assets, net.
The following table lists the componentstables provide additional information related to gain on disposal of assets, net included in our consolidated statements of operations and purchases of property and equipment by major category (dollarsincluded in thousands)our consolidated statements of cash flows (in millions):
Estimated | ||||||||||||||
December 31, | Useful Lives | |||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | (in years) | ||||||||||||
Property and equipment: | ||||||||||||||
Land | $ | 50,458 | $ | 44,611 | ||||||||||
Buildings and improvements | 156,924 | 139,078 | 7 | to | 40 | |||||||||
Equipment | 511,878 | 471,798 | 3 | to | 20 | |||||||||
| 719,260 | 655,487 | |||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (368,602 | ) | (329,394 | ) | ||||||||||
Total property and equipment, net | $ | 350,658 | $ | 326,093 | ||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | $ | 9 | $ | 253 | $ | 9 | ||||||
Proceeds from Repack | 29 | 41 | 14 | |||||||||
Net book value of assets disposed | (9 | ) | (240 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 29 | $ | 54 | $ | 17 | ||||||
Purchase of property and equipment: | ||||||||||||
Recurring purchases - operations | $ | 87 | $ | 89 | $ | 41 | ||||||
Repack | 23 | 20 | 27 | |||||||||
Repack related | 0 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 110 | $ | 110 | $ | 70 | ||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2017, our total property and equipment balance, before accumulated depreciation, increased approximately $45.7 million primarily as the net result of acquisitions and dispositions. The remaining change in the balances between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017 was due to routine purchases of equipment, less retirements.
Deferred Loan Costs. Loan acquisition costs are amortized over the life of the applicable indebtedness using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method. In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No.2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) - Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.ASU 2015-03 amended previous guidance to require thatThese debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability beare presented in theour balance sheetsheets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debtDebt issuance costs were not affected by the amendments in this ASU. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No.2015-15, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) -Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associatedassociated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements- Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting. ASU 2015-15 amended previous guidance to codify the June 18, 2015 staff announcement that the SEC staff would not object to the deferral and presentationline-of-credit arrangements are presented as an asset, and subsequent amortizationamortized over the life of such asset, of deferred debt issuance costs related to line of credit arrangements. We adopted these standards as of January 1, 2016.the line-of-credit arrangement.
Asset Retirement Obligations. We own office equipment, broadcasting equipment, leasehold improvements and transmission towers, some of which are located on, or are housed in, leased property or facilities. At the conclusion of several of these leases we are obligated to dismantle, remove and otherwise properly dispose of and remediate the facility or property. We estimate our asset retirement obligations based upon the net present value of the cash flows of the costs expected to be incurred. Asset retirement obligations are recognized as a non-current liability and as a component of the cost of the related asset. Changes to our asset retirement obligations resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original undiscounted cash flow estimates are recognized as an increase or decrease in the carrying amount of the asset retirement obligation and the related asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the related property, plant or equipment. Changes in asset retirement obligations resulting from accretion of the net present value of the estimated cash flows are recognized as operating expenses. We recognize depreciation expense of the capitalized cost over the estimated life of the lease. Our estimated obligations are due at varying times through 2062. The liability recognized for our asset retirement obligations was approximately $1.1$2 million and $0.8 million as ofat December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019. respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, 20162019 and 2015,2018, we recorded expenses of $71,000,$15,000 and $34,000, respectively, related to our asset retirement obligations.obligations were not material.
Concentration of Credit Risk. We sell advertising air-timeairtime on our broadcasts and advertising space on our websites to national and local advertisers within the geographic areas in which we operate. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition, and generally advance payment is not required, except for political advertising. Credit losses are provided for in the financial statements and consistently have been within our expectations that are based upon our prior experience.
Excluding political advertising revenue, which is cyclical based on election cycles, our most significant category of customer is automotive. During the years ended December 31, 20172020, and 20162019 and 20152018 approximately 21%, 25% and 25%,22% and 24%, respectively, of our broadcast advertising revenue (excluding political advertising revenue) was obtained from advertising sales to automotive customers. Although our revenues can be affected by changes within in our customer base, we believe this risk is in part mitigated due to the fact that no one customer accounted for in excess of 5% of our broadcast advertising revenue in any of these periods. Furthermore, we believe that our large geographic operating area partially mitigates the potential effect of regional economic impacts.
Earnings Per Share. We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant period. The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding does not include restricted shares. These shares, although classified as issued and outstanding, are considered contingently returnable until the restrictions lapse and, in accordance with U.S.United States GAAP, are not included in the basic earnings per share calculation until the shares vest. Diluted earnings per share is computed by including all potentially dilutive common shares, including restricted shares and shares underlying stock options, in the diluted weighted-average shares outstanding calculation, unless their inclusion would be antidilutive.
The following table reconciles basic weighted-average shares outstanding to diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands)millions):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding – basic | 73,061 | 71,848 | 68,330 | |||||||||
Weighted-average shares underlying stock options and restricted shares | 775 | 916 | 657 | |||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding - diluted | 73,836 | 72,764 | 68,987 | |||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic | 96 | 99 | 88 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares underlying stock options and restricted shares | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted | 97 | 100 | 89 | |||||||||
Valuation of Broadcast Licenses, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We have acquired a significant portion of our assets in acquisition transactions. Among the assets acquired in these transactions were broadcast licenses issued by the FCC, goodwill and other intangible assets.
For broadcast licenses acquired prior to January 1, 2002, we recorded their respective values using a residual method (analogous to “goodwill”) where the excess of the purchase price paid in the acquisition over the fair value of all identified tangible and intangible assets acquired was attributed to the broadcast license. This residual basis approach generally produces higher valuations of broadcast licenses when compared to applying an income method as discussed below.
For broadcast licenses acquired afterafter December 31, 2001, we record their respective values using an income approach. Under this approach, a broadcast license is valued based on analyzing the estimated after-tax discounted future cash flows of the acquired station, assuming an initial hypothetical start-up operation maturing into an average performing station in a specific television market and giving consideration to other relevant factors such as the technical qualities of the broadcast license and the number of competing broadcast licenses within that market. For television stations acquired after December 31, 2001, we allocate the residual value of the station to goodwill.
When renewing broadcast licenses, we incur regulatoryregulatory filing fees and legal fees. We expense these fees as they are incurred.
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of assets acquired, identifiable intangible assets, less liabilities assumed. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis (at year end) or between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying amount.
Other intangible assets that we have acquired include network affiliation agreements, retransmission agreements, advertising contracts, client lists, talent contracts and leases. Although each of our stations is affiliated with at least one broadcast network, we believe that the value of a television station is derived primarily from the attributes of its broadcast license rather than its network affiliation agreement. As a result, we allocate only minimal values to our network affiliation agreements. We classify our other intangible assets as finite-lived intangible assets. The amortization period of our other intangible assets is equal to the shorter of their estimated useful life or contract period, including expected extensions thereof. When renewing other intangible asset contracts, we incur legal fees that are expensed as incurred.
Impairment Testing of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets.We test for impairment of our indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis on the last day of each fiscal year. December 31. However, if certain triggering events occur, we test for impairment during the relevant reporting period. For goodwill, we have elected to bypass the qualitative assessment provisions and to perform the prescribed testing steps for goodwill on an annual basis.when such events occur.
For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, each of our individual television markets or production companies is considered a separate reporting unit. We review each television marketIn the performance of our annual assessment of goodwill for possible goodwill impairment, by comparingwe have the estimatedoption to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not a reporting unit has been impaired. As part of this qualitative assessment we evaluate the relative impact of factors that are specific to the reporting units as well as industry, regulatory, and macroeconomic factors that could affect the significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the assets. We also consider the significance of the excess fair value over the carrying value reflected in prior quantitative assessments and the changes to each respectivereporting unit’s carrying value since the last impairment test.
If we conclude that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired, or if we elect notto perform the recorded value of that reporting unit’s net assets. Ifoptional qualitative assessment, we will determine the estimated fair value exceeds the recorded net asset value, no goodwill impairment is deemed to exist. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit does not exceedand compare that to the recordednet book value of that reporting unit’s net assets, we then perform, on a notional basis, a purchase price allocation by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value tounit. If the fair value of all tangible and identifiable intangible assets with residual fairis less than the net book value, representing the implied fair value of goodwill of that reporting unit. The recorded value ofwe will record an impairment to goodwill for the reporting unit is written down to this implied value.amount of the difference.
To estimate the fair value of our reporting units for a quantitative assessment, we utilize a discounted cash flow model supported by a market multiple approach. We believe that a discounted cash flow analysis is the most appropriate methodology to test the recorded value of long-term assets with a demonstrated long-lived/enduring franchise value. We believe the results of the discounted cash flow and market multiple approaches provide reasonable estimates of the fair value of our reporting units because these approaches are based on our actual results and reasonable estimates of future performance, and also take into consideration a number of other factors deemed relevant by us including, but not limited to, expected future market revenue growth, market revenue shares and operating profit margins. We have historically used these approaches in determining the value of our reporting units. We also consider a market multiple approach to corroborate our discounted cash flow analysis. We believe that this methodology is consistent with the approach that a strategic market participant would utilize if they were to value one of our television stations.reporting units.
For testingIn the performance of our annual assessment of broadcast licenses for impairment we have the option to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that these assets are impaired. When evaluating our broadcast licenses for impairment, the qualitative assessment is done at the individual television station level. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that one of our broadcast licenses for potential impairment of their recorded asset values,is impaired, we compare their estimatedwill perform a quantitative assessment by comparing the fair value of the broadcast license to the respective asset’s recordedits carrying value. If the fair value is greater than the asset’s recorded value, no impairment expense is recorded. If the fair value does not exceed the asset’s recorded value, we record an impairment expense equal to the amount that the asset’s recorded value exceeded the asset’s fair value. We use the income method to estimate the fair value of all broadcast licenses irrespective of whether they were initially recorded using the residual or income methods.
For further discussion of our goodwill, broadcast licenses and other intangible assets, see Note 1013 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets.”
AccumulatedAccumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. Our accumulated other comprehensive loss balances as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 consist of adjustments to our pension liabilities net of related income tax benefits as follows (in thousands)millions):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||
Accumulated balances of items included in accumulated other comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||
Items included in accumulated other comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||
Increase in pension liability | $ | (36,336 | ) | $ | (28,926 | ) | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (42 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit | (14,171 | ) | (11,281 | ) | (13 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (22,165 | ) | $ | (17,645 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | ||||
Recent Accounting PronouncementsPronouncements. .In February 2016,January 2020, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2020-01,Investments—Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) (ASU 20162020-02 – Leases (Topic 84201). ASU 20162020-0201 will supersede Topic 840,Leases, and thus will supersede nearly all existing lease guidance by requiringclarifies the reclassification of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requiring disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. The standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. This standard is expected to have a material effect on our balance sheets. Specifically, we expect that, once adopted, we will record a right of use asset and lease obligation liability. As of December 31, 2017, the values of those assets and related liabilities were each approximately $17.6 million. We are also evaluating our footnote disclosure requirements. We will continue to review our contractual obligations related to this standard, and develop our disclosures, assessing our internal controls and availing ourselves of broadcasting industry related guidance.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 amends the guidance of U.S. GAAP with the intent of simplifying how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. After adoptioninteraction of the standard,accounting for equity securities under Topic 321, the annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test will be performed by comparingaccounting for equity method investments in Topic 323, and the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge would be recognizedaccounting for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized willcertain forward contracts and purchased options in Topic not815. exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.The standardASU 2020-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The standard allows for early adoption, but we have not yet made that determination. We do not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our financial statements.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02,Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU 2018-02 allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”). Consequently, the amendments eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA and will improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. However, because the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the TCJA, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The standard allows for early adoption, but we have not yet made that determination. We do not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our financial statements.
Adoption of Accounting Standards and Reclassifications. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 provides new guidance on revenue recognition for revenue from contracts with customers and will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective. This guidance requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The standard is intended to improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities and provide more useful information through improved financial statement disclosures. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. ASU 2015-14 deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and permitted early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. The standard permits the use of either a retrospective to each reporting period presented method, or a retrospective with the cumulative effect method to adopt the standard. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,Principal versus Agent Considerations. This ASU amends the guidance of ASU 2014-09 to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations for reporting gross revenue versus net revenue. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. This ASU amends the guidance of ASU 2014-09 to clarify the identification of performance obligations and to provide additional licensing implementation guidance. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. This ASU was issued to provide guidance in assessing collectibility, presentation of sales taxes, noncash consideration, and completed contracts and contract modifications at transition, in order to reduce the potential for diversity in practice at initial application, and to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the standard. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Technical Corrections and Improvements. This ASU was issued to clarify the standard and to correct unintended application of guidance.We have completed our assessment and concluded that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change the timing of recognition related to our revenue streams. We adopted this standardus beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.2022. We used the modified retrospective method to implement the standard. This standard’s most significant impact is expanded disclosures related to the disaggregation of our revenue streams and deposits received from customers’ pre-payments. Our internal controls related to the revenue recognition process will not be changing, with the exception of those controls related to presentation and disclosure.
In January 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No.20162019-0112, – Financial Instruments - OverallIncome Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Subtopic(ASU 8252019-1012), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP regarding the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The new standard significantly revises an entity’s accountingwhich is intended to simplify various areas related to the classificationaccounting for income taxes and measurementimprove consistent application of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changesTopic 740. ASU 2019-12 is effective for financial liabilities measured at fair value. We adopted this standardus beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.2022.
Adoption of Accounting Standard. On January 1, 2020, we adopted the amendments in ASU 2016-13,Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on a modified-retrospective basis with comparative periods reported in accordance with previous guidance. These amendments require the measurement of credit losses using historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Prior to this adoption, our allowance for doubtful accounts was equal to a portion of our receivable balances that were 120 days old or older. We generally provided allowances for certain receivable balances that were less than 120 days old when warranted by specific facts and circumstances. The adoption of this standardthe amendments in ASU 2016-13 did not have a material impacteffect on our financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Improvementsaddition to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 amended the guidance in U.S. GAAP with the intent of simplifying several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Our adoption of this standard included an adjustment to record the impact on our deferred asset related to the net federal and state income tax deductions for grants, and subsequent vesting, of restricted stock in excess of our book basis expense. Accordingly, we have recorded adjustments to increase our deferred tax asset and our accumulated deficit, as of January 1, 2017, by approximately $1.1 million. Beginning in 2017, we began recording similar net excess or deficit tax deductions as current tax benefit or expense and as reductions in the related income tax prepaid or payable, or deferred tax assets.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 amends the guidance of U.S. GAAP with the intent of addressing eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. We adopted this standard beginning in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Clarifying the Definition of a Business. ASU 2017-01 amends the guidance of U.S. GAAP with the intent of clarifying the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. We adopted this standard beginning in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07,Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715) - Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. ASU 2017-07 amends the guidance of U.S. GAAP with the intent of improving the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost by prescribing where the amount of net benefit cost should be presented in an employer’s income statement and requiring the disclosure by line item of the amount of net benefit cost that is included in the income statement or capitalized in assets. We adopted this standard beginning in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Certainstandards described above, certain amounts in the consolidated statementbalance sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows have also been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
2 Revenue Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when we have completed a specified service and 2. Acquisitions.Dispositions
Advertising Revenue. Broadcast advertising revenue is generated primarily from the broadcast of television advertising time to local, national and political advertisers. Most advertising contracts are short-term, and generally run only for a few weeks. Our performance obligation is satisfied when the advertisement is broadcast or appears on our stations’ websites or mobile applications. Advertising revenue is recognized when the performance obligation is satisfied and then billed to the customer in the period the revenue is recognized. We have an unconditional right to receive payment of the amount billed generally within 30 days of the invoice date. Payment terms are expressly stated in our standard terms and conditions. The invoiced amount to be received is recorded in accounts receivable on our balance sheets.
We broadcast the customer’s advertisement either preceding or following a television station’s network programming and within local and syndicated programming. Broadcast advertising is sold in time increments and is priced primarily on the basis of a program’s popularity among the specific audience an advertiser desires to reach. In addition, broadcast advertising rates are affected by the number of advertisers competing for the available time, the size and demographic makeup of the market served by the station and the availability of alternative advertising media in the market area. Broadcast advertising rates are generally the highest during the most desirable viewing hours, with corresponding reductions during other hours. The ratings of a local station affiliated with a major network can be affected by ratings of network programming. Internet advertising is placed on our stations’ websites and mobile applications. These advertisements may be in the form of banner advertisements, pre-roll advertisements or video and other types of advertisements or sponsorships.
We generate advertising revenue either by the efforts of our direct sales employees or through third party advertising agency intermediaries. Third party advertising intermediaries represent the customer and contract with us to deliver broadcast or internet advertising for the customer.
Retransmission Consent Revenue. We enter into license agreements with cable, satellite, multichannel video programming distributors and digital delivery system (or “OTT”) customers (collectively “MVPD”) that provide them the right to use our broadcast signal for retransmission across the MVPD system for an agreed period of time. These agreements represent a sales and usage based functional intellectual property license based on the number of subscribers to the licensee’s delivery systems. Our performance obligation is to provide the licensee with access to our intellectual property when it is broadcast. The duration of the typical retransmission consent contract is three years. Retransmission consent revenue is recognized continuously during the period of the contract as we transmit our broadcast signal to the MVPD. The amount of revenue recognized is determined based upon a fixed rate per subscriber multiplied by the number of active subscribers to our MVPD customer systems for the given month. We bill our MVPD customers monthly over the life of the retransmission consent contract. We have an unconditional right to receive payment of the amount billed generally within 30 days from the invoice date. Payment terms are expressly stated in our retransmission consent contracts as well as in the standard terms and conditions. The invoiced amount to be received is recorded in accounts receivable on our balance sheets.
Subscriber data necessary to calculate the amount of retransmission consent revenue to be recognized for the current month is not received until subsequent to that month. We estimate the current month retransmission consent revenue based upon the subscriber data from the most recent subscriber report by the MVPD. We record the estimate in the current month as retransmission consent revenue and then adjust the amount recorded in that month when we receive the actual subscriber data. We typically have monthly adjustments to our revenue to account for changes in MVPD subscribers on a monthly basis, however, the number of MVPD subscribers does not change materially on a monthly basis and this adjustment does not materially impact our recorded retransmission consent revenue on a quarterly or annual basis.
Production Company Revenue. Our production company revenues include sports marketing, production and event management, sports and entertainment production services and automotive programming production and marketing solutions. We recognize revenue of marketing, production and events at the time the events are aired or delivered. We recognize advertising revenues related to the events when the advertisements are aired. Sponsorship revenue is recognized ratably over the contractual period of the sponsorship.
Other Revenues. Other revenues consist of production, tower rental and other miscellaneous items. Production revenue is derived from the production of programming. Production revenue is recognized as the programming is produced. Tower rental income is recognized monthly over the life of the lease. All of our leases under which we are lessor are considered operating leases. Other revenue is comprised of one-time or infrequently occurring special projects, dubbing, fees and other miscellaneous items. Other revenue is recognized as the services are performed. Other revenue is generated by our direct sales employees.
Expedients. We expense direct and agency commissions when incurred because our advertising contracts are one year or less in duration and the amortization period for capitalized expenses would be less than one year. Direct commissions are included in broadcast operating expense and agency commissions are netted against gross revenue in our consolidated statements of operations.
The nature of our contracts with advertising customers is such that our performance obligations arise and are satisfied concurrent with the broadcast or web placement of the advertisement. We did not have incomplete or unsatisfied performance obligations at the end of any period presented.
We record a deposit liability for cash deposits received from our customers that are to be applied as payment once the performance obligation arises and is satisfied in the manner stated above. These deposits are recorded as deposit liabilities on our balance sheet. When we invoice our customers for completed performance obligations, we are unconditionally entitled to receive payment of the invoiced amounts. Therefore, we record invoiced amounts in accounts receivable on our balance sheet. We require amounts payable under advertising contracts with our political advertising customers to be paid for in advance. We record the receipt of this cash as a deposit liability. Once the advertisement has been broadcast, the revenue is earned, and we record the revenue and reduce the balance in this deposit liability account. We recorded $9 million of revenue in the year ended December 31, 2020 that was included in the deposit liability balance as of December 31, 2019. The deposit liability balance is included in deferred revenue on our consolidated balance sheets. The deposit liability balance was $21 million and $9 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Disaggregation of Revenue. Revenue from our broadcast segment is generated through both our direct and advertising agency intermediary sales channels. Revenue from our production companies segment is generated through our direct sales channel. The following table presents our revenue from contracts with customers disaggregated by type of service and sales channel (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Market and service type: | ||||||||||||
Advertising: | ||||||||||||
Local | $ | 771 | $ | 898 | $ | 443 | ||||||
National | 198 | 229 | 114 | |||||||||
Political | 430 | 68 | 155 | |||||||||
Total advertising | 1,399 | 1,195 | 712 | |||||||||
Retransmission consent | 867 | 796 | 355 | |||||||||
Production companies | 61 | 87 | 0 | |||||||||
Other | 54 | 44 | 17 | |||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 2,381 | $ | 2,122 | $ | 1,084 | ||||||
Sales channel: | ||||||||||||
Direct | $ | 1,302 | $ | 1,270 | $ | 552 | ||||||
Advertising agency intermediary | 1,079 | 852 | 532 | |||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 2,381 | $ | 2,122 | $ | 1,084 | ||||||
| 3. | Acquisitionsand Divestitures |
During 2017,2020, 20162019 and 2015,2018, we entered intocompleted a number of acquisition and dispositiondivestiture transactions. The acquisition transactions were and are expected to, among other things, increase our revenues and cash flows from operating activities, and allow us to operate more efficiently and effectively by increasing our scale and providing us, among other things, with the ability to negotiate more favorable terms in our agreements with third parties.
20172020 Acquisitions.Acquisitions
Alaska Transactions.On January 13, 2017,July 31, 2020, we acquired completed the assetsacquisition of KTVF-TV (NBC), KXDF-TV (CBS), and KFXF-TV (FOX)television station operations in the Fairbanks,Anchorage and Juneau, Alaska television market (DMA 202148) and 207, respectively), from Tanana Valley Television Company and Tanana Valley Holdings, LLC for an adjusted purchase price of $8.0 million (the “Fairbanks Acquisition”), with cash on hand.
As described in Note 1 above, on January 17, 2017, we completed the Media General Acquisition, for an adjusted purchase price of $269.9$19 million, using cash on hand.hand (the “Alaska Transactions”).
Columbus Transactions.On MaySeptember 1, 2017,2020, we acquired thecertain non-license assets of WDTV-TV (CBS) and WVFX-TV (FOX/CW)WLTZ-TV (NBC), in the Clarksburg-Weston, West VirginiaColumbus, Georgia market (DMA 129) and entered into shared services and other related agreements with SagamoreHill of Columbus GA, LLC (“SagamoreHill”) to provide news and back-office services to WLTZ-TV (the “Columbus Transactions”). We paid was $22 million to SagamoreHill, using cash on hand (the “Columbus Transactions”).
Sioux Falls Transactions. On November 2, 2020, Gray entered into a new network affiliation agreement with the FOX Broadcasting Network for one of its television stations in the Sioux Falls, South Dakota television market (DMA 169115) that utilize certain non-license assets that Gray acquired at the same time from Withers Broadcasting CompanyIndependent Communications, Inc., for $22 million using cash on hand, for the former FOX affiliate for the market.
Lubbock Transactions. On December 31, 2020, we acquired television Station KLCW-TV (CW) and certain low power television stations in the Lubbock, Texas market (DMA 142), as well as certain non-license assets of West Virginia (the “Clarksburg Acquisition”)KJTV-TV (FOX) and two additional low power stations and certain real estate, for a totalcombined purchase price of $26.5$23 million, withusing cash on hand. On May 13, 2016, we announced that we agreed to enter into the Clarksburg Acquisition. On June 1, 2016, we made a partial payment of $16.5 million and acquired the non-license assets of these stations. Also, on that date, we began operating thesealso entered into a shared services agreement with SagamoreHill to provide news and back-office services to KJTV-TV and its associated low power stations subjectusing cash on hand (the “Lubbock Transactions”). Due to the controlproximity of the seller, under a local marketing agreement (“LMA”) that terminated upon completionclosing date of the acquisition.
OnLubbock Transactions to the balance sheet date of May 1, 2017,December 31, 2020, we acquired the assets of WABI-TV (CBS/CW) in the Bangor, Maine television market (DMA 156) and WCJB-TV (ABC/CW) in the Gainesville, Florida television market (DMA 159) from Community Broadcasting Service and Diversified Broadcasting, Inc. (collectively, the “Diversified Acquisition”) forare unable to present a totalpreliminary purchase price of $85.0 million with cash on hand. On April 1, 2017, we began operating these stations, subject toallocation for the control of the seller, under an LMA that terminated upon completion of the acquisition.
On August 1, 2017, we acquired the assets of WCAX-TV (CBS) in the Burlington, Vermont – Plattsburgh, New York television markets (DMA 97) from Mt. Mansfield Television, Inc., for an adjusted purchase price of $29.0 million in cash (the “Vermont Acquisition”). On June 1, 2017, we advanced $23.2 millionbusiness. The payment of the purchase price to the seller is included in our other non-current assets at December 31, 2020, and began to operate the station under an LMA, subject to the control of the seller. At closing, we paid the remaining $5.8 million of the purchase price with cash on hand and the LMA was terminated.
We refer to the eight stations that we began operating and acquired (excluding the stations acquiredis included in the Clarksburg Acquisition, which we began operating under an LMAacquisitions of television businesses and licenses, net of cash acquired line in 2016) during 2017 as the “2017 Acquisitions.”our statement of cash flows. The following table summarizes fair value estimates of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and resulting goodwill will be based upon management’s estimate of the 2017 Acquisitionsfair values using valuation techniques including income, cost and market approaches. In estimating the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed, the fair value estimates will be based on, among other factors, expected future revenue and cash flows, expected future growth rates and estimated discount rates.
The following table summarizes the preliminary values of the assets acquired and resulting goodwill of the Alaska Transactions, Columbus Transactions and the Clarksburg AcquisitionSioux Falls Transactions (in thousands)millions):
Acquisition | 2020 Acquisitions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairbanks | Media General | Clarksburg | Diversified | Vermont | Total | Alaska | Columbus | Sioux Falls | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets | $ | 122 | $ | 666 | $ | 462 | $ | 361 | $ | 312 | $ | 1,923 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable and other current assets | $ | 1 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property and equipment | 2,650 | 20,181 | 4,133 | 12,329 | 9,513 | 48,806 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 471 | 86,287 | 3,222 | 35,486 | 316 | 125,782 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcast licenses | 2,228 | 149,846 | 17,003 | 26,219 | 7,592 | 202,888 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets | 2,702 | 13,398 | 2,234 | 11,051 | 8,268 | 37,653 | 9 | 19 | 11 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-current assets | 71 | 282 | 51 | 27 | 3,310 | 3,741 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities | (140 | ) | (695 | ) | (554 | ) | (423 | ) | (311 | ) | (2,123 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | (84 | ) | - | (51 | ) | (50 | ) | - | (185 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,020 | $ | 269,965 | $ | 26,500 | $ | 85,000 | $ | 29,000 | $ | 418,485 | $ | 19 | $ | 22 | $ | 22 | $ | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||
These amounts are based upon management’s determinationmanagement’s preliminary estimate of the fair values using valuation techniques including income, cost and market approaches. In determining the preliminary fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, the fair values were determined based on, among other factors, expected future revenue and cash flows, expected future growth rates, and estimated discount rates. The fair value estimates of the assets acquired in the Clarksburg Acquisition, Diversified Acquisition and the Vermont Acquisition are still considered to be preliminary, and, as such, the actual amounts may differ materially from these estimates.
Property and equipment are recorded at their fair value and are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from three years to 40 years.
Amounts related to other intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of approximately 1 to 4 years.
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and represents the future economic benefits expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition, as well as future synergies that we expect to generate from each acquisition. The goodwill recognized related to this acquisition is deductible for income tax purposes.
The Company’s consolidated results of operations for year ended December 31, 2020 include the results of the 2020 Acquisitions beginning on each transaction’s date of acquisition, but these amounts were not material.
In addition, we acquired broadcast licenses totaling approximately $5 million that did not qualify as acquisitions of businesses.
“Transaction Related Expenses” incurred in connection with the 2020 Acquisitions, during the year ended December 31, 2020, were approximately $1 million.
2019 Acquisitions and Divestitures.
Raycom Merger. On January 2, 2019, we completed an acquisition of all the equity interests of Raycom Media, Inc. (“Raycom”). In connection with the acquisition of Raycom and on the same date, Gray assumed and completed Raycom’s pending acquisitions of WUPV-DT in the Richmond, Virginia market and KYOU-TV in the Ottumwa, Iowa market. To facilitate regulatory approval of the acquisition of Raycom and to satisfy the conditions placed on the acquisition by the DOJ and the FCC, we completed the divestiture of nine television stations in overlapping markets. We refer to the acquisition of Raycom, WUPV-DT and KYOU-TV and the divestiture of the stations in the nine overlapping markets collectively as the “Raycom Merger.”
The Raycom Merger completed our transformation from a small, regional broadcaster to a leading media company with nationwide scale based on high-quality stations with exceptional talent in attractive markets. The following table lists the stations acquired and retained, net of divestitures:
Current | Station | |||||
DMA | Call | Network | ||||
Rank | DMA | Letters | Affiliation | |||
| 15 | Tampa-St. Petersburg (Sarasota), FL | WWSB | ABC | |||
| 19 | Cleveland/Akron (Canton) | WOIO | CBS | |||
| 19 | Cleveland/Akron (Canton) | WUAB | CW | |||
| 23 | Charlotte, NC | WBTV | CBS | |||
| 41 | West Palm Beach/Ft. Pierce, FL | WFLX | FOX | |||
| 34 | Cincinnati, OH | WXIX | FOX | |||
| 50 | Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa), AL | WBRC | FOX | |||
| 49 | Louisville, KY | WAVE | NBC | |||
| 51 | New Orleans, LA | WVUE | FOX | |||
| 52 | Memphis, TN | WMC | NBC | |||
| 54 | Richmond/Petersburg, VA | WWBT | NBC | |||
| 54 | Richmond/Petersburg, VA | WUPV | CW | |||
| 75 | Tucson/Nogales, AZ | KOLD | CBS | |||
| 66 | Honolulu, HI | KHNL | NBC | |||
| 66 | Honolulu, HI | KGMB | CBS | |||
| 66 | Honolulu, HI | KHBC | NBC/CBS | |||
| 66 | Honolulu, HI | KOGG | NBC/CBS | |||
| 79 | Columbia, SC | WIS | NBC | |||
| 81 | Huntsville/Decatur/Florence, AL | WAFF | NBC | |||
| 91 | Paducah, KY/Cape Girardeau, MO/ | |||||
Harrisburg, IL | KFVS | CBS | ||||
| 96 | Shreveport, LA | KSLA | CBS | |||
| 87 | Savannah, GA | WTOC | CBS | |||
| 88 | Charleston, SC | WCSC | CBS | |||
| 93 | Baton Rouge, LA | WAFB | CBS | |||
| 93 | Baton Rouge, LA | WBXH | MY | |||
| 97 | Jackson, MS | WLBT | NBC | |||
| 89 | Myrtle Beach/Florence, SC | WMBF | NBC | |||
| 106 | Boise, ID | KNIN | FOX | |||
| 107 | Evansville, IN | WFIE | NBC | |||
| 112 | Tyler/Longview, TX | KLTV | ABC | |||
| 112 | Tyler/Longview, TX | KTRE | ABC | |||
| 119 | Montgomery, AL | WSFA | NBC | |||
| 124 | Wilmington, NC | WECT | NBC | |||
| 129 | Columbus, GA/Opelika, AL | WTVM | ABC | |||
| 137 | Amarillo, TX | KFDA | CBS | |||
| 137 | Amarillo, TX | KEYU | TEL | |||
| 142 | Lubbock, TX | KCBD | NBC | |||
| 150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KWAB | CW | |||
| 150 | Odessa/Midland, TX | KTLE | TEL | |||
| 154 | Wichita Falls, TX/Lawton, OK | KSWO | ABC | |||
| 154 | Wichita Falls, TX/Lawton, OK | KKTM | TEL | |||
| 161 | Albany, GA | WALB | NBC/ABC | |||
| 153 | Biloxi/Gulfport, MS | WLOX | ABC/CBS | |||
| 168 | Hattiesburg/Laurel, MS | WDAM | NBC/ABC | |||
| 183 | Jonesboro, AR | KAIT | ABC/NBC | |||
| 201 | Ottumwa, IA/Kirksville, MO | KYOU | FOX/NBC |
On January 2, 2019, the following stations were acquired from Raycom and their assets were immediately divested in eight markets as follows (dollars in millions):
Total | |||||||||||
Cash | Station | Current | |||||||||
Consideration | Call | DMA | |||||||||
Purchaser | Received | Letters | DMA | Rank | |||||||
Lockwood Broadcasting, Inc. | $ | 67 | WTNZ | Knoxville, TN | 60 | ||||||
WFXG | Augusta, GA | 111 | |||||||||
WPGX | Panama City, FL | 139 | |||||||||
WDFX | Dothan, AL | 175 | |||||||||
Scripps Media, Inc. | 55 | KXXV | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | 95 | |||||||
KRHD | Waco/Temple/Bryan, TX | 95 | |||||||||
WTXL | Tallahassee, FL | 113 | |||||||||
TEGNA, Inc. | 109 | WTOL | Toledo, OH | 78 | |||||||
KWES | Odessa/Midland, TX | 150 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 231 | |||||||||
The allocated portion of net consideration paid for the assets and liabilities divested for the stations in these eight overlap markets was approximately $234 million.
The net consideration paid to acquire Raycom consisted of $2.84 billion of cash, 11.5 million shares of our common stock, valued at $170 million (a non-cash financing transaction), and $650 million of a new series of preferred stock (a non-cash financing transaction), for a total of $3.66 billion. Please refer to Note 6 “Stockholders Equity” and Note 7 “Preferred Stock” for further information. The cash consideration paid to acquire the two stations that Raycom had previously agreed to acquire (KYOU-TV and WUPV-TV listed above) was $17 million. The following table summarizes the consideration paid related to the Raycom Merger and the amount representing the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in millions):
KYOU | ||||||||||||
and | Net | |||||||||||
Raycom | WUPV | Consideration | ||||||||||
Purchase Price | $ | 3,660 | $ | 17 | $ | 3,677 | ||||||
Less - consideration allocated to all assets acquired and net of liabilities assumed for the Raycom overlap market stations which were also divested on January 2, 2019 | (234 | ) | 0 | (234 | ) | |||||||
Purchase consideration for assets acquired and liabilities assumed net of divestitures | $ | 3,426 | $ | 17 | $ | 3,443 | ||||||
United Acquisition. On May 1, 2019, we acquired the assets of WWNY-TV (CBS) and WNYF-CD (FOX) in Watertown, New York (DMA 174) and KEYC-TV (CBS/FOX) in Mankato, Minnesota (DMA 198) from United Communications Corporation (“United Acquisition”) for an adjusted purchase price of $48 million of cash, excluding Transaction Related Expenses. We began operating those stations on March 1, 2019 under a local programming and marketing agreement, which increased the total number of our markets from 91 to 93.
Sioux Falls Acquisition. On September 25, 2019, we acquired KDLT-TV (NBC), in the Sioux Falls, South Dakota market (DMA 115), for $33 million, using cash on hand (“Sioux Falls Acquisition”).
Charlottesville Acquisition and Divestiture. On October 1, 2019, we acquired the assets of WVIR-TV (NBC) in the Charlottesville, Virginia market (DMA 189) from Waterman Broadcasting Corporation for $13 million using cash on hand (the “Charlottesville Acquisition”). Also, on October 1, 2019, in order to meet regulatory requirements, we divested our legacy stations in that market, WCAV-TV (CBS/FOX) and WVAW-TV (ABC). The divestitures resulted in a gain of approximately $19 million.
The following table summarizes the values of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and resulting goodwill of the Raycom Merger, the United Acquisition, The Sioux Falls Acquisition and the Charlottesville Acquisition (together, the “2019 Acquisitions”) (in millions):
2019 Acquisitions | ||||||||||||||||||||
Raycom | United | Sioux Falls | Charlottesville | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Cash | $ | 115 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 115 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 243 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 248 | |||||||||||||||
Program broadcast rights | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment | 311 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 338 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease right of use asset | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 829 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 834 | |||||||||||||||
Broadcast licenses | 2,004 | 24 | 14 | 2 | 2,044 | |||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets | 504 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 522 | |||||||||||||||
Other non-current assets | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits | (29 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (29 | ) | |||||||||||||
Program broadcast obligations | (16 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other current liabilities | (60 | ) | 0 | (1 | ) | 0 | (61 | ) | ||||||||||||
Federal and state income taxes payable | (3 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (472 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (472 | ) | |||||||||||||
Operating lease liabilities | (52 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (52 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | (25 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (25 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 3,443 | $ | 48 | $ | 33 | $ | 13 | $ | 3,537 | ||||||||||
These amounts are based upon management’s estimate of the fair values using valuation techniques including income, cost and market approaches. In determining the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, the fair values were determined based on, among other factors, expected future revenue and cash flows, expected future growth rates, and estimated discount rates.
Accounts receivable are recorded at their fair value representing the amount we expect to collect. Gross contractual amounts receivable are approximately $2 million more than their recorded fair value.
Property and equipment are recorded at their fair value and are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from three years to 40 years.
Amounts related to other intangible assets represent primarily the estimated fair values of retransmission agreements of $27.9 million; advertising client relationships$322 million, shared services agreements of $5.3 million;$98 million, and favorable income leasesnetwork affiliation agreements of $3.0$50 million. These intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of approximately 5.14.1 years for retransmission agreements;agreements, approximately 10.77.7 years for advertising client relationships;shared services agreements, and approximately 11.93.7 years for favorable income leases.network affiliation agreements.
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and represents the future economic benefits expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition, including assembled workforce, as well as future synergies that we expect to generate from each acquisition. We recorded $125.8$829 million of goodwill related to stations acquired and retained in 2017. Thethe Raycom Merger: $3 million of goodwill recognized related to these acquisitions isthe stations acquired in the United Acquisition; $2 million of goodwill related to the stations acquired in the Sioux Falls Acquisition; and goodwill related to the stations acquired in the Charlottesville Acquisition was not material. A portion of the goodwill acquired in the Raycom Merger, in the amount of approximately $150 million, will be deductible by us for income tax purposes.
The Company’sCompany’s consolidated results of operations for year ended December 31, 20172019 includeincludes the results of the Raycom Merger beginning on 2017January 2, 2019, Acquisitions from the date of each transaction. United Acquisition beginning on March 1, 2019, the Sioux Falls Acquisition beginning on September 25, 2019, and the Charlottesville Acquisition beginning on October 1, 2019. Revenues attributable theretoto the 2019 Acquisitions and included in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 20172019 were $79.8 million.was $1.1 billion. Operating income attributable thereto and included in our consolidated statement of operations for year ended December 31, 2017 was $33.7 million.
In connection with acquiringto the 20172019 Acquisitions we incurred $1.1 million of transaction related costs during the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily related to legal, consulting and other professional services.
2016Acquisitions and Dispositions
On February 16, 2016, we completed the acquisition of the television and radio broadcast assets of Schurz Communications, Inc. (“Schurz”) for an adjusted purchase price of $443.1 million plus transaction related expenses (the “Schurz Acquisition”).
To facilitate regulatory approval for the Schurz Acquistion, on February 1, 2016, we exchanged the assets of KAKE-TV (ABC) (and its satellite stations) in the Wichita, Kansas television market, for the assets of Lockwood Broadcasting, Inc.’s television station WBXX-TV (CW) in the Knoxville, Tennessee television market and $11.2 million of cash (the “WBXX Acquisition”). In connection with the divestiture of KAKE-TV’s assets, we recorded a gain of approximately $2.0 million, excluding transaction related expenses.
To further faciliate regulatory approvals for the Schurz Acquisition, on February 16, 2016, we exchanged the assets of WSBT-TV for the assets of Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.’s television station WLUC-TV (NBC/FOX) in the Marquette, Michigan television market (the “WLUC Acquisition”), and we sold the Schurz radio broadcast assets (the “Schurz Radio Stations”) for $16.0 million to threethird-party radio broadcasters. We did not record a gain or loss related to the WLUC Acquisition or related to the divestiture of the Schurz Radio Stations because the fair value of the assets given were determined to be equal to the assets received.
The Schurz Acquisition, the WBXX Acquisition, the WLUC Acquisition, and the sale of the Schurz Radio Stations are referred to collectively as the “Schurz Acquisition and Related Transactions.” We used borrowings of $425.0 million (the “2016 Term Loan”) under our then-existing senior credit facility, as amended (the “2014 Senior Credit Facility”), to fund a portion of the purchase price to complete the Schurz Acquisition and to pay a portion of the related fees and expenses, the remainder of which were paid from cash on hand. See Note 3 “Long-term Debt” for further information regarding our financing activities.
The net consideration to complete the Schurz Acquisition and Related Transactions was as follows (in thousands):
Schurz | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition | ||||||||||||||||
and the | ||||||||||||||||
Divestiture | Acquisition | Acquisition | ||||||||||||||
of KAKE-TV | of WBXX-TV | of WLUC-TV | Total | |||||||||||||
Base purchase price | $ | - | $ | 30,000 | $ | 442,500 | $ | 472,500 | ||||||||
Purchase price adjustment | - | - | 574 | 574 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted purchase price | - | 30,000 | 443,074 | 473,074 | ||||||||||||
Cash consideration received from sale of Schurz Radio Stations | - | - | (16,000 | ) | (16,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Net adjusted purchase price allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed | - | 30,000 | 427,074 | 457,074 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash consideration received | (30,000 | ) | - | - | (30,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash consideration received | (11,200 | ) | - | - | (11,200 | ) | ||||||||||
Net consideration - the Schurz Acquisition and Related Transactions | $ | (41,200 | ) | $ | 30,000 | $ | 427,074 | $ | 415,874 | |||||||
On June 27, 2016, we completed the acquisition of KYES-TV (MY, Ant.), a television station serving the Anchorage, Alaska television market, from Fireweed Communications, LLC (the “KYES-TV Acquisition”). The purchase price of $0.5 million, plus transaction related expenses, was paid with cash on hand.
We refer to the stations acquired and retained in 2016, as well as the Clarksburg Acquisition, whose stations we began operating under and LMA in June 2016, as the “2016 Acquisitions.” The fair values of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and resulting goodwill of the television station acquisitions we completed in 2016 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Schurz | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition | ||||||||||||||||
and the | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition | Acquisition | Acquisition | ||||||||||||||
of KYES-TV | of WBXX-TV | of WLUC-TV | Total | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 19,226 | $ | 19,226 | ||||||||
Other current assets | - | 429 | 4,606 | 5,035 | ||||||||||||
Property and equipment | 176 | 1,633 | 97,814 | 99,623 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill | 28 | 10,288 | 61,981 | 72,297 | ||||||||||||
Broadcast licenses | 254 | 18,199 | 231,391 | 249,844 | ||||||||||||
Other intangible assets | 42 | - | 19,523 | 19,565 | ||||||||||||
Other non-current assets | - | 408 | 3,028 | 3,436 | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities | - | (460 | ) | (8,903 | ) | (9,363 | ) | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | - | (497 | ) | (1,592 | ) | (2,089 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 500 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 427,074 | $ | 457,574 | ||||||||
These amounts are based upon management’s determination of the fair values using valuation techniques including income, cost and market approaches. In determining the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, the fair values were determined based on, among other factors, expected future revenue and cash flows, expected future growth rates, and estimated discount rates.
Accounts receivable are recorded at their fair value representing the amount we expect to collect. Gross contractual amounts receivable are approximately $0.2 million more than their recorded fair value.
Property and equipment are recorded at their fair value and are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from three years to 40 years.
Amounts related to other intangible assets represent primarily the estimated fair values of retransmission agreements of $14.9 million; advertising client relationships of $1.6 million; and favorable income leases of $2.6 million. These intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of approximately 4.9 years for retransmission agreements; approximately 5.5 years for advertising client relationships; and approximately 9.5 years for favorable income leases.
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and represents the future economic benefits expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition, including assembled workforce, as well as future synergies that we expect to generate from each acquisition. We recorded $72.3 million of goodwill related to stations acquired in 2016. The goodwill recognized related to these acquisitions is deductible for income tax purposes.
The Company’s consolidated results of operations for year ended December 31, 2016 include the results of the 2016 Acquisitions from the date of each transaction. Revenues attributable thereto and included in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $130.4 million. Operating income attributable thereto and included in our consolidated statement of operations for year ended December 31, 20162019 was $55.8$198 million.
InThe following table summarizes the approximate Transaction Related Expenses incurred in connection with acquiring the 20162019 Acquisitions, we incurred $7.4 million of transaction related costs during the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, primarily related to legal, consultingby type and other professional services.by financial statement line item (in millions):
2015 Acquisitions and Dispositions
On September 1, 2015, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with The Cedar Rapids Television Company and The Gazette Company to acquire the assets of KCRG-TV, which is affiliated with the ABC Network and serves the Cedar Rapids, Iowa television market (the “Cedar Rapids Acquisition”). Also on September 1, 2015, we acquired certain non-license operating assets of this station and entered into an LMA with the licensee. Under the terms of the LMA, we operated the station subject to the control of the seller and its obligations under the station’s FCC license. As a result of the terms of the LMA, we included the operating results of the station in our financial statements beginning on September 1, 2015. On October 1, 2015, we acquired the non-license related real estate assets of KCRG-TV. The acquisition was completed on November 1, 2015, with the acquisition of the FCC license and license related assets. The purchase price for the station assets was $100.0 million, and was funded with cash on hand.
On July 1,2015, we acquired from ICA Broadcasting I, LTD, the assets of KOSA-TV, whose digital channels are affiliated with the CBS and MY Networks and which station serves the Odessa-Midland, Texas television market (the “Odessa Acquisition”). The purchase price was $33.6 million and was funded with cash on hand.
On July 1,2015, we acquired from Neuhoff Media Twin Falls, LLC the assets of KMVT-TV, whose digital channels are affiliated with the CBS and CW Networks, as well as KSVT-LD, whose digital channel is affiliated jointly with the FOX and MY Networks. These stations serve the Twin Falls, Idaho television market (the “Twin Falls Acquisition”). The purchase price was $17.5 million, and was funded with cash on hand.
On July 1, 2015, we acquired from Davis Television Wausau, LLC certain non-license assets of WFXS-TV, which had served as the FOX affiliate for the Wausau-Rhinelander, Wisconsin television market (the “Wausau Acquisition”). On that date WFXS-TV ceased operating, and we began broadcasting its former program streams on our digital low power television station in Wausau, WZAW-LD. The purchase price was $14.0 million, and was funded with cash on hand.
On July 1, 2015, we acquired from NEPSK, Inc. the assets of WAGM-TV, whose digital channels are affiliated with the CBS and FOX Networks and which station serves the Presque Isle, Maine television market (the Presque Isle Acquisition”). The purchase price was $10.3 million, and was funded with cash on hand.
On July 1, 2015, we acquired from Eagle Creek Broadcasting of Laredo, LLC certain non-license assets of KVTV-TV, which had served as the CBS affiliate for the Laredo, Texas television market (the “Laredo Acquisition”). On that date KVTV-TV ceased operating, and we began broadcasting its former program streams on our digital low power television station in Laredo, KYLX-LD. The purchase price was $9.0 million, and was funded with cash on hand.
Year Ended | ||||
December 31, | ||||
2019 | ||||
Transaction Related Expenses by type: | ||||
Legal, consulting and other professional fees | $ | 24 | ||
Incentive compensation and other severance costs | 21 | |||
Termination of sales representation and other agreements | 34 | |||
Total Transaction Related Expenses | $ | 79 | ||
Transaction Related Expenses by financial statement line item: | ||||
Operating expenses before depreciation, amortization and loss (gain) on disposal of assets, net: | ||||
Broadcasting | $ | 45 | ||
Corporate and administrative | 34 | |||
Total Transaction Related Expenses | $ | 79 | ||
We refer to the stations acquired and retained in 2015as the “2015 Acquisitions.” The fair values of the acquired assets, assumed liabilities and the resulting goodwill from the 2015 Acquisitions are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Acquisition | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cedar Rapids | Odessa | Twin Falls | Wausau | Presque Isle | Laredo | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other current assets | $ | 503 | $ | 87 | $ | 93 | $ | 87 | $ | 45 | $ | 22 | $ | 837 | ||||||||||||||
Property and equipment | 13,754 | 4,629 | 5,172 | 1,985 | 2,822 | 1,411 | 29,773 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 25,006 | 3,719 | 2,587 | 11,616 | 245 | 5,154 | 48,327 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcast licenses | 55,676 | 22,253 | 6,333 | - | 6,150 | - | 90,412 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets | 5,849 | 3,067 | 3,485 | 397 | 1,039 | 2,435 | 16,272 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-current assets | 13 | 13 | 32 | 87 | - | 13 | 158 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities | (792 | ) | (155 | ) | (170 | ) | (85 | ) | (51 | ) | (22 | ) | (1,275 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | (13 | ) | (13 | ) | (32 | ) | (87 | ) | - | (13 | ) | (158 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 99,996 | $ | 33,600 | $ | 17,500 | $ | 14,000 | $ | 10,250 | $ | 9,000 | $ | 184,346 | ||||||||||||||
These amounts are based upon management’s determination of the fair values using valuation techniques including income, cost and market approaches. In determining the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, the fair values were determined based on, among other factors, expected future revenue and cash flows, expected future growth rates, and estimated discount rates.
Property and equipment are recorded at their fair value and are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from three years to 40 years.
The amount related to other intangible assets primarily represents the estimated fair values of retransmission agreements of $9.7 million; advertising client relationships of $1.0 million; and income leases of $5.4 million. These intangible assets are being amortized over the estimated remaining useful lives of 5.3 years for retransmission agreements; 9.6 years for advertising client relationships; and 16.9 years for income leases.
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and represents the future economic benefits expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition, including assembled workforce, as well as future synergies that we expect to generate from each acquisition. We recorded $48.3 million of goodwill related to stations acquired in 2015. The goodwill recognized related to these acquisitions is deductible for income tax purposes.
We believe that the value of a television station is derived primarily from the attributes of its broadcast license rather than its network affiliation. Consistent with that determination, no fair value was separately allocated to the acquired network affiliation agreements.
OnSeptember 1, 2015, we donated the FCC license and certain other assets of KMTF-TV in Helena, Montana, which formerly simulcast the CW channel broadcast by our KTVH-D2, to Montana State University (“MSU”). This donation allowed MSU to operate a full power PBS affiliated television station in the state’s capital for the first time, augmenting the statewide PBS network that MSU operates. We recorded a loss on disposal of approximately $0.1 million related to this donation.
On November 1, 2015, we sold to Cordillera Communications, LLC television station KBGF-TV, the NBC affiliate for the Great Falls, Montana television market, and television station KTVH-TV, the NBC and CW affiliate for the Helena, Montana television market. Total consideration received was $3.0 million, and we recorded a gain on disposal of approximately $0.9 million related to this disposition in 2015.
The Company’s consolidated results of operations for year ended December 31, 2015 include the results of the 2015 Acquisitions from the date of each transaction. Net revenues and operating income of the businesses acquired in the 2015 Acquisitions included in our audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $23.2 million and $8.6 million, respectively.
In connection with acquiring the 2015 Acquisitions, we incurred transaction costs totaling $6.5 million primarily related to legal, consulting and other professional services that are included in our corporate and administrative expenses in the year ended December 31, 2015.
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
Pro Forma Data – 2019Acquisitions Completed in 2017.. The following table sets forth certain unaudited pro forma information for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016assuming that the acquisitions completed in 20172019 Acquisitions occurred on January 1, 20162019 (in thousands,millions, except per share data):
Years Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2019 | ||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 895,081 | $ | 926,799 | $ | 2,139 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 260,909 | $ | 88,679 | $ | 241 | ||||||
Basic net income per share | $ | 3.57 | $ | 1.23 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share | $ | 3.53 | $ | 1.22 | ||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 189 | ||||||||||
Basic net income attributable to common stockholders, per share | $ | 2.43 | ||||||||||
Diluted net income attributable to common stockholders, per share | $ | 2.41 | ||||||||||
This pro forma financial information is based on Gray’sGray’s historical results of operations and the historical results of operations of the acquisitions completedtelevision stations acquired, net of divestitures, included in the 2017,2019 Acquisitions, adjusted for the effect of fair value estimates and other acquisition accounting adjustments, and is not necessarily indicative of what our results would have been had we acquired each ofcompleted the stations acquired in 20172019 Acquisitions on January 1, 20162019 or on any other historical date, nor is it reflective of our expected results of operations for any future period. The pro forma adjustments for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016reflect depreciation expense and amortization of finite-lived intangible assets related to the fair value of the assets acquired, Transaction Related Expenses and the related tax effects of the adjustments. This pro forma financial information has been prepared based on estimates and assumptions that we believe are reasonable as of the date hereof, and are subject to change based on, among other things, changes in the fair value estimates or underlying assumptions.
Pro Forma Data – Acquisitions Completed in 2016.The following table sets forth certain unaudited pro forma information for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 assuming that the acquisitions completed in 2016 occurred on January 1,2015 (in thousands, except per share data):
Years Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 825,787 | $ | 701,550 | ||||
Net income | $ | 57,795 | $ | 39,360 | ||||
Basic net income per share | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.58 | ||||
Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.79 | $ | 0.57 | ||||
This pro forma financial information is based on Gray’s historical results of operations and the historical results of operations of the stations acquired in 2016, adjusted for the effect of fair value estimates and other acquisition accounting adjustments, and is not necessarily indicative of what our results would have been had we acquired each of the stations acquired in 2016 on January 1,2015 or on any other historical date, nor is it reflective of our expected results of operations for any future period. The pro forma adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 reflect depreciation expense and amortization of finite-lived intangible assets related to the fair value of the assets acquired, and the related tax effects of the adjustments. This pro forma financial information has been prepared based on estimates and assumptions that we believe are reasonable as of the date hereof, and are subject to change based on, among other things, changes in the underlying assumptions.
Pro Forma Data - 20152018 AcquisitionsDivestiture. The following table sets forth certain unaudited pro forma information for the year endedOn December 31, 20152018, assuming that the 2015 Acquisitions occurred on January 1,2015 (in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended | ||||
December 31, | ||||
2015 | ||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 621,530 | ||
Net income | $ | 46,181 | ||
Basic net income per share | $ | 0.68 | ||
Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.67 | ||
This pro forma financial information is based on Gray’s historical results of operations and the 2015 Acquisitions’ historical results of operations, adjusted for the effect of fair value estimates and other acquisition accounting adjustments, and is not necessarily indicative of what our results would have been had we completed eachin order to facilitate regulatory approval of the 2015 Acquisitions on January 1,2015 or on any other historical date, nor is it reflectiveRaycom Merger, we sold the assets of our expected results of operationsWSWG-TV (DMA 161) in the Albany, Georgia television market for any future period. The pro forma adjustments for$9 million, excluding Transaction Related Expenses, to Marquee Broadcasting, Inc. and Marquee Broadcasting Georgia, Inc. In connection with the year ended December 31, 2015 reflect depreciation expense and amortization of finite-lived intangible assets related to the fair valuedivestiture of the assets acquired, and the related tax effects of the adjustments. This pro forma financial information has been prepared based on estimates and assumptions thatWSWG-TV, we believe are reasonable asrecorded a gain of the date hereof, and are subject to change based on, among other things, changesapproximately $5 million in the underlying assumptions.fourth quarter of 2018.
34.. Long-term Debt
As of December 31, 20172020, and 2016,long-term debt consisted of obligations under our 2019 Senior Credit Facility (as defined below), our 5.875% senior notes due 2026 (the “2026 Notes”), our 7.0% senior notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”) and our 4.75% senior notes due 2030 (the “2030 Notes”). As of December 31, 2019, long-term debt primarily consisted of obligations under our 2017 Senior Credit Facility (as defined below), our 2014 Senior Credit Facility (as defined below), our 5.125% senior notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes”), our 2026 Notes and our 5.875%2027 senior notes due 2026 (the “2026 Notes”),Notes as follows (in thousands)millions):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||
Long-term debt including current portion: | ||||||||||||||||
2014 Senior Credit Facility | $ | - | $ | 556,438 | ||||||||||||
2017 Senior Credit Facility | 635,234 | - | ||||||||||||||
2017 Term Loan | $ | 595 | $ | 595 | ||||||||||||
2019 Term Loan | 1,190 | 1,190 | ||||||||||||||
2024 Notes | 525,000 | 525,000 | 0 | 525 | ||||||||||||
2026 Notes | 700,000 | 700,000 | 700 | 700 | ||||||||||||
2027 Notes | 750 | 750 | ||||||||||||||
2030 Notes | 800 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Total outstanding principal | 1,860,234 | 1,781,438 | 4,035 | 3,760 | ||||||||||||
Unamortized deferred loan costs - 2014 Senior Credit Facility | - | (12,158 | ) | |||||||||||||
Unamortized deferred loan costs - 2017 Senior Credit Facility | (11,777 | ) | - | |||||||||||||
Unamortized deferred loan costs - 2019 Term Loan | (34 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unamortized deferred loan costs - 2024 Notes | (6,743 | ) | (7,742 | ) | 0 | (5 | ) | |||||||||
Unamortized deferred loan costs - 2026 Notes | (9,473 | ) | (10,588 | ) | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Unamortized deferred loan costs - 2027 Notes | (10 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unamortized deferred loan costs - 2030 Notes | (14 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||
Unamortized premium - 2026 Notes | 5,187 | 5,797 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Less current portion | (6,417 | ) | - | |||||||||||||
Net carrying value | $ | 1,831,011 | $ | 1,756,747 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less deferred financing costs | $ | 3,974 | $ | 3,697 | ||||||||||||
Borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 100,000 | $ | 60,000 | ||||||||||||
Borrowing availability under Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 200 | $ | 200 | ||||||||||||
On February 7, 2017, we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “2017 Senior Credit Facility”), consisting of a $556.4 million term loan facility (the “2017 Initial Term Loan”) and a $100.0 million revolving credit facility (the “2017 Revolving Credit Facility”). Amounts outstandingBorrowings under the 2017 Initial Term Loan were used to repay amounts outstanding under our prior credit agreement (the “2014 Senior Credit Facility”). On April 3, 2017, we borrowed $85.0 million under an incremental term loan (the “2017 Incremental Term Loan” and, together with the 2017 Initial Term Loan, the “2017 Term Loan”) under the 2017 Senior Credit Facility to fund the Diversified Acquisition. As of December 31, 2017, the 2017 Senior Credit Facility provided total commitments of $735.2 million, consisting of the $635.2 million 20172019 Term Loan and the $100.0 million 2017 Revolving Credit Facility. Our quarterly principal payments under the 2017 Term Loan are $1.6 million.
Prior to the entry into the 2017 Senior Credit Facility, the 2014 Senior Credit Facility consisted of a a term loan and a revolving loan facility. Excluding accrued interest, the amount outstanding under our 2014 Senior Credit Facility as of December 31, 2016 consisted solely of a term loan balance of $556.4 million. As of December 31, 2016, the interest rate on the balance outstanding under the 2014 Senior Credit Facility was 3.9%.
Borrowings under the 2017 Term Loan bear interest, at our option, at either the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or the Base Rate, (as defined below), in each case, plus an applicable margin. Currently, the applicable margin is 2.25% for LIBOR borrowings and 1.25% for Base Rate borrowings. The applicable margin is determined quarterly based on our leverage ratio as set forth in the 2017 Senior Credit Facility (the “Leverage Ratio”). If our Leverage Ratio is less than or equal to 5.25 to 1.00, the applicable margin is 2.25% for all LIBOR borrowings and 1.25% for all Base Rate borrowings, and if the Leverage Ratio is greater than 5.25 to 1.00, the applicable margin is 2.5% for all LIBOR borrowings and 1.5% for all Base Rate borrowings. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the interest rate on the balance outstanding under the 20172019 Term Loan was 3.6%.
Borrowings under the 2017 Revolving Credit Facility currently bear interest, at our option, at either LIBOR plus 1.50% or Base Rate plus 0.50%, in each case based on a first lien leverage ratio test as set forth in the 2017 Senior Credit Facility (the “First Lien Leverage Ratio”). Base Rate is defined as the greatest of (i) the administrative agent’s prime rate, (ii) the overnight federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) LIBOR plus 1.00%. We are required to pay a commitment fee on the average daily unused portion of the 2017 Revolving Credit Facility, which rate may range from 0.375% to 0.50% on an annual basis, based on the First Lien Leverage Ratio. The 2017 Revolving Credit Facility matures on February 7, 2022, and the 2017 Term Loan matureswere 2.7% and 2.4%, respectively. The 2019 Term Loan and the 2017 Term Loan mature onJanuary 2, 2026 and February 7, 2024.2024, respectively.
As a resultOn October 19, 2020, we issued $800 million of entering intoour 2030 Notes and used the 2017 Senior Credit Facility, we recorded a loss on extinguishmentnet proceeds therefrom, after deducting transaction fees and estimated expenses, to redeem all of debt of approximately $2.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2017, and we incurred approximately $5.0 million in deferred financing costs that will be amortized over the life of the 2017 Senior Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had $525.0 million ofour outstanding 2024 Notes outstanding. and to pay all fees and expenses in connection with the offering, including the redemption premium applicable to the 2024 Notes. We intend to use the remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes, which could include the repayment of outstanding debt from time to time. The interest rate and yield on the 20242030 Notes were 5.125%is 4.75%. The 20242030 Notes rank equally with the 2027 Notes and the 2026 Notes and the 2030 Notes mature on October 15, 2024.2030. Interest is payable semiannually, on April 15 15and October 15 15of each year.
On June 14, 2016, we completed the private placement of $500.0 million of our 2026 Notes (the “Original 2026 Notes”) at par. On September 14, 2016, we completed the private placement of an additional $200.0 million of our 2026 Notes (the “Additional 2026 Notes”). The Additional 2026 Notes were issued at a price of 103.0%, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $206.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest from and including June 14, 2016. As of December 31, 20172020, and 2016, we had $700.0 millionthe aggregate minimum principal maturities of 2026 Notes outstanding. The interest rate and yield on the Original 2026 Notesour long-term debt were 5.875%. The interest rate and yield on the Additional 2026 Notes were 5.875% and 5.398%, respectively. The Additional 2026 Notes are an additional issuance of, rank equally with and form a single series with the Original 2026 Notes. The 2026 Notes mature on July 15, 2026. Interest is payable semiannually, on January 15 and July 15 of each year.as follows (in millions):
Minimum Principal Maturities | ||||||||||||||||||||
2019 Senior | 2026 | 2027 | 2030 | |||||||||||||||||
Year | Credit Facility | Notes | Notes | Notes | Total | |||||||||||||||
2021 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
2024 | 595 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 595 | |||||||||||||||
2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Thereafter | 1,190 | 700 | 750 | 800 | 3,440 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,785 | $ | 700 | $ | 750 | $ | 800 | $ | 4,035 | ||||||||||
Collateral, Covenants and RestrictionsRestrictions.. Our obligations under the 20172019 Senior Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of our consolidated assets, excluding real estate. In addition, substantially all of our subsidiaries are joint and several guarantors of, and our ownership interests in those subsidiaries are pledged to collateralize, our obligations under the 20172019 Senior Credit Facility. Gray Television, Inc. is a holding company, and has no material independent assets or operations. For all applicable periods, the 20242026 Notes, 2027 Notes and 20262030 Notes have been fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several, senior unsecured basis, by substantially all of Gray Television, Inc.'s’s subsidiaries. Any subsidiaries of Gray Television, Inc. that do not guranteeguarantee the 20242026 Notes, 2027 Notes and 20262030 Notes are minor.not material. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there were no significant restrictions on the ability of Gray Television, Inc.'s subsidiaries to distribute cash to Gray or to the guarantor subsidaries.subsidiaries.
The 20172019 Senior Credit Facility contains affirmative and restrictive covenants with which we must comply, including: (a) limitations on additional indebtedness, (b) limitations on liens, (c) limitations on the sale of assets, (d) limitations on guarantees, (e) limitations on investments and acquisitions, (f) limitations on the payment of dividends and share repurchases, (g) limitations on mergers and (h) maintenance of the First Lien Leverage Ratio while any amount is outstanding under the revolving credit facility, as well as other customary covenants for credit facilities of this type. The 2026 Notes, 2027 Notes and 20242030 Notes include covenants with which we must comply which are typical for borrowing transactions of their nature. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we were in compliance with all required covenants under all our debt obligations.
Maturities
Aggregate minimum principal maturities on long-term debt as of December 31, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):
Minimum Principal Maturities | ||||||||||||||||
2017 Senior | 2024 | 2026 | ||||||||||||||
Year | Credit Facility | Notes | Notes | Total | ||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 6,417 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 6,417 | ||||||||
2019 | 6,417 | - | - | 6,417 | ||||||||||||
2020 | 6,417 | - | - | 6,417 | ||||||||||||
2021 | 6,417 | - | - | 6,417 | ||||||||||||
2022 | 6,417 | - | - | 6,417 | ||||||||||||
Thereafter | 603,149 | 525,000 | 700,000 | 1,828,149 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 635,234 | $ | 525,000 | $ | 700,000 | $ | 1,860,234 | ||||||||
Interest Payments. For all of our interest bearinginterest-bearing obligations, we made interest payments of approximately $97.0$179 million, $76.2$212 million and $76.9$95 million during 2017,2020, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. We did not capitalize any interest payments during those years.
Amendments. On February 19, 2021, we entered into an amendment to the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 orSenior Credit Facility, which, among other things, increases availability under the revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility") under the 2015.2019 Senior Credit Facility from an aggregate principal amount of $200 million to an aggregate principal amount of $300 million. Please refer to Note 16 "Subsequent Events" for more information.
45.. Fair Value Measurement
For purposes of determining aWe measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value, which are classified by the FASB Codification within the fair value hierarchy as level 1,2, or 3, on the basis of whether the measurement we utilizeemploys observable or unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data orobtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions and consider information about readily available market participant assumptions.
● | Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets |
● | Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets |
● | Level 3: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable |
Fair value is defined as the price that market participants would use in pricingbe received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, including assumptions about risk andin an orderly transaction between market participants at the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable. We utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized into a hierarchy that gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (“Level 1”) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs that require assumptions to measure fair value (“Level 3”). Level 2 inputs are those that are other than quoted prices on national exchanges included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly (“Level 2”).
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The estimated fair value of financial instruments is determined using market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Interpreting market data to develop fair value estimates involves considerable judgment.measurement date. The use of different market assumptions or methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we could realize in a current market exchange, or the value that ultimately will be realized upon maturity or disposition.measurement.
The carrying amounts of the following instruments approximate fair value due to their short term to maturity: (i) accounts receivable, (ii) prepaid and other current assets, (iii) accounts payable, (iv) accrued employee compensation and benefits, (v) accrued interest, (vi) other accrued expenses, (vii) acquisition-related liabilities and (viii) deferred revenue.revenue approximate fair value at both December 31, 2020 and 2019.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the carrying amount of our long-term debt was $1.8$4.0 billion and the fair value was $1.9$4.1 billion. As of December 31, 20162019, the carrying amount and fair value of our long-term debt were each $1.8was $3.7 billion and the fair value was $3.9 billion. Fair value of our long-term debt is based on observable estimates provided by third-party financial professionalsservice providers and as such is classified withinas Level 22. of the fair value hierarchy.
56.. Stockholders’ Equity
We are authorized to issue 135245 million shares of all classes of stock, of which 1525 million shares are designated Class A common stock, 100200 million shares are designated common stock, and 20 million shares are designated “blank check” preferred stock for which our Board of Directors has the authority to determine the rights, powers, limitations and restrictions. The rights of our common stock and Class A common stock are identical, except that our Class A common stock has 10 votes per share and our common stock has one1 vote per share. Our common stock and Class A common stock are entitled to receive cash dividends if declared, on an equal per-share basis. For the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, 20162019 and 2015,2018, we did not declare or pay any common stock or Class A common stock dividends.
InOn DecemberJanuary 2, 2019, 2017,we completed an underwritten public offering of 17.25issued 11.5 million shares of our common stock at a price toof $14.74 per share, which was the public of $14.50 per share. The net proceeds from the offering were $238.9 million, after deducting underwriting discounts of $10.6 million and expenses of $0.6million. The proceeds of this offering are currently being held in our corporate treasury.
In March2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of 13.5 million shares ofclosing price for our common stock at a priceon the last trading day preceding the Raycom Merger, to the publiccertain former shareholders of $13.00 per share. The net proceeds from the offering were $167.3 million, after deducting underwriting discounts of $7.5 million and expenses of $0.9million. We used the net proceeds from the offering to pay a significant portionRaycom as part of the total consideration to complete the 2015 Acquisitions.
In each of March and November 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the Company to repurchase up to 2.0 million shares of the Company's common stock and Class A common stock. In March 2006, this authorization was increased to an aggregate of 5.0 million shares (the “2004-2006 Repurchase Authorization”). As of December 31, 2017, 279,200 shares remain availablepaid for repurchase under this authorization, which has no expiration date.that transaction.
On November 6, 2016,5, 2019, theour Board of Directors of the Company authorized the Company to purchaserepurchase of up to an additional $75.0$150 million of our outstanding common stock prior toor our Class A common stock through December 31, 20192022 (the “20162019 Repurchase Authorization”). The 20162019 Repurchase Authorization superseded all prior repurchase authorizations and prohibits the Company from purchasing shares directly from the Company’s officers, directors, or the Gray Television, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan (the (“401k Plan”).
On December 15, 2019, we entered into an Issuer Repurchase Plan (the “2019 IRP”), under Rules 10b-18 and 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The purpose of the 2019 IRP was to facilitate the orderly repurchase of our common stock through the establishment of the parameters for repurchases of our shares. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 2020, under this plan, we purchased 322,038905,836 shares of our common stock at an average purchase price of$12.39 $11.02 per share, under the 2016 Repurchase Authorization,excluding commissions, for a total cost of approximately $10 million, after which the $4.02019 million.IRP was terminated in the second quarter of 2020.
Subsequent to the termination of the 2019 IRP we repurchased an additional 3,688,022 shares of our common stock, for a total cost of approximately $51 million at an average purchase price of $13.81 per share, excluding commissions. As of December 31, 2017,2020, $69.0approximately $68 million remainswas available to purchaserepurchase shares of our common stock and/or Class A common stock under the 20162019 Repurchase Authorization.
On November 4, 2020, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to an additional $150 million of outstanding common stock and/or Class A common stock through December 31, 2023 (the “2020 Repurchase Authorization”). During 2020, under this plan, we repurchased 864,026 shares of our common stock, for a total cost of approximately $14 million at an average purchase price of $16.47 per share, excluding commissions. As of December 31, 2020, approximately $136 million was available to repurchase shares of our common stock and/or Class A common stock under the 2020 Repurchase Authorization.
Together, the capacity under our repurchase authorizations totals $204 million. Future share repurchases would be implemented through purchases made from time to time in either the open market or private transactions in accordance with applicable securities law requirements, including Rule 10b5-1.The extent to which the Company repurchaseswe repurchase any of itsour shares, the number of shares and the timing of any repurchases will depend on general market conditions,conditions, regulatory requirements, alternative investment opportunities and other considerations. The Company isWe are not required to repurchase a minimum number of shares, and the repurchase authorizations may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice.
Under our various employee benefit plans, we may, at our discretion, issue authorized and unissued shares, or previously issued shares held in treasury, of our Class A common stock or common stock. stock, held in treasury. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had reserved 7,422,9654,006,948 shares and 1,923,1441,336,440 shares of our common stock and Class A common stock, respectively, for future issuance under various employee benefit plans. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had reserved 5,449,1486,130,944 shares and 257,5811,503,254 shares of our common stock and Class A common stock, respectively, for future issuance under various employee benefit plans.
67. Preferred Stock
In connection with the Raycom Merger, on January 2, 2019, we issued 650,000 shares of our Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock, with a stated face value and liquidation value of $1,000 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”). Holders of shares of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive mandatory and cumulative dividends paid quarterly in cash or, at the Company’s option, paid quarterly in kind by issuance of additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The per-share amount of such quarterly mandatory and cumulative dividends will be calculated by multiplying the face value by 8% per annum if the dividends are to be paid in cash or 8.5% per annum if such dividends are to be paid in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock (“PIK Election Dividends”). If the Company elects to pay any portion of accrued dividends with PIK Election Dividends, it will be prohibited from repurchasing, redeeming or paying dividends on any stock that is junior to the Series A Preferred Stock through the end of that quarter and the subsequent two quarters, subject to certain exceptions.
With respect to the payment of dividends, the Series A Preferred Stock will rank senior to all classes and series of our common stock and all other equity securities designated as ranking junior to the Series A Preferred Stock, and no new issuances of common or preferred stock will rank on a parity with, nor senior to, the Series A Preferred Stock.
All or any portion of the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the Company’s option at any time, upon written notice to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock at least 30 and not more than 60 days prior to the date of such optional redemption. The per-share redemption price for Series A Preferred Stock will be equal to the sum of the liquidation value and the per-share amount of any unpaid dividends for the current quarterly dividend period, up to and including the date of redemption. Holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock redeemed will be paid in cash.
The Series A Preferred Stock is also subject to mandatory redemption upon the occurrence of certain change of control transactions or upon the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets. The holders of Series A Preferred Stock do not have any right to exchange or convert the shares into any other securities.
In general, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock do not have any voting rights except as set forth in the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock or as otherwise required by law, in which case, each share of Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to one vote.
The approval of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, voting separately as a class, is required in order to authorize, create or issue new shares of Series A Perpetual Preferred stock (other than to pay dividends), or alter the rights of any other shares that are or would be equal to or senior to the Series A Preferred Stock, or to amend, alter or repeal the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation as amended from time to time if such amendment, alteration or repeal adversely affects the powers, preferences or special rights of the Series A Preferred Stock.
The Series A Preferred Stock does not have preemptive rights as to any of our other securities, or any warrants, rights, or options to acquire any of our securities.
In the event that the Company voluntarily or involuntarily liquidates, dissolves or winds up its affairs, holders of Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive for each share of Series A Preferred Stock, out of the Company’s assets or proceeds thereof available for distribution to shareholders, subject to the rights of any creditors, payment in full in an amount equal to the liquidation value and the per-share amount of any unpaid dividends for the current quarterly dividend period. Holders of Series A Preferred Stock would be entitled to receive this amount before any distribution of assets or proceeds to holders of our common stock and any other stock whose rights are junior to the Series A Preferred Stock. If in any distribution described above, our assets are not sufficient to pay in full the amounts payable with respect to the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock or any stock whose rights are equal to the Series A Preferred Stock, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock would share ratably in any such distribution in proportion to the full respective distributions to which they are entitled. Shareholders are not subject to further assessments on their shares of the New Preferred Stock.
8. Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize compensation expense for share-basedstock-based payment awards made to our employees, consultants and directors. Our active stock-based compensation plans include ourthe 2017 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the (“2017 EICP”); our 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2007 Incentive Plan”); and our Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan.. The following table presents our stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands)millions):
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense, gross | $ | 8,303 | $ | 5,099 | $ | 4,019 | $ | 16 | $ | 16 | $ | 7 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit at our statutory rate associated with stock-based compensation | (3,238 | ) | (1,989 | ) | (1,567 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense, net | $ | 5,065 | $ | 3,110 | $ | 2,452 | $ | 12 | $ | 12 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||
Currently, the 2017 EICP provides for, and, while awards were available for grant thereunder the 2007 Incentive Plan provided for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, stock appreciation rights, and performance awards to acquire shares of our Class A common stock or common stock, or other awards based on our performance. Under the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, each director can be awarded up to 10,000 shares of restricted common stock or Class A common stock each calendar year. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we did not grant any awards under the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan. All shares of common stock and Class A common stock underlying outstanding options, restricted stock units and performance awards are counted as issued under the 2017 EICP the 2007 Incentive Plan and the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan for purposes of determining the number of shares available for future issuance.
During 2020, we granted under the 2017 we granted:EICP:
● |
|
● |
| |
|
| |
|
|
During 2016, we granted, under the 2007 Incentive Plan:
|
|
|
| |
|
|
During 2015, we granted, under the 2007 Incentive Plan:
|
|
|
| |
|
|
As of December 31, 2017, we had 4.8 million shares of our common stock and 1.9 million shares of our Class A common stock available for issuance under the 2017 EICP.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had outstanding options to acquire 274,746 shares of our common stock, all of which were vested and exercisable under the 2007 Incentive Plan. All outstanding options were granted with exercise prices equal the market value of the underlying stock at the close of business on the date of the grant. The exercise price of all our outstanding stock options is $1.99 per share. The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding stock options was $4.1 million based on the closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2017. There are no shares available for future awards under this plan.
As of December 31, 2017, under the Directors Restricted Stock Plan there were 770,000 shares available for future award.
As of December 31, 2017, we had $3.4 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to all non-vested share based compensation arrangements. This expense is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.4 years.
A summary of activity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 under our stock based compensation plans is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock - common: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - beginning of period | 396,033 | $ | 12.06 | 337,506 | $ | 9.57 | 385,056 | $ | 9.09 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted | 307,943 | 10.40 | 237,500 | 12.88 | 150,308 | 10.27 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Vested | (200,291 | ) | 11.82 | (178,973 | ) | 8.46 | (197,858 | ) | 9.16 | ||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - end of period | 503,685 | $ | 11.14 | 396,033 | $ | 12.06 | 337,506 | $ | 9.57 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock - Class A common: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - beginning of period | 415,082 | $ | 10.15 | 374,693 | $ | 9.46 | 204,473 | $ | 9.81 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted | 275,076 | 10.84 | 218,612 | 11.25 | 287,513 | 9.37 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Vested | (227,526 | ) | 10.00 | (178,223 | ) | 10.04 | (117,293 | ) | 9.85 | ||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - end of period | 462,632 | $ | 10.63 | 415,082 | $ | 10.15 | 374,693 | $ | 9.46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock units - common: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - beginning of period | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granted | 215,500 | 15.70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (6,000 | ) | 15.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - end of period | 209,500 | $ | 15.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsequent Event. On February 14, 2018, we granted the following restricted stock awards, with a total grant date fair value of approximately $7.6 million, under the 2017 EICP:
|
|
● |
|
● | 207,787 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $21.69 to certain employees, of which 69,262 shares vested on January 31, 2021, 69,262 shares will vest on January 31, 2022 and 69,263 shares will vest on January 31, 2023; |
● | 40,756 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $21.69 to an employee, subject to the achievement of certain performance measures, which will vest on January 31, 2023; |
● | Restricted stock units representing 90,184 shares of our common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $18.92 to certain employees, of which 60,052 shares will vest on March 1, 2021; and 15,066 shares will vest on each of March 1, 2022 and 2023; |
● | Restricted stock units representing 3,000 shares of our common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $14.30 to an employee, which vested on June 1, 2020; and |
● | 32,216 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $15.52 to an employee that will vest on September 1, 2021. |
During 2019, we granted under the 2017 EICP:
● | 99,905 shares of restricted class A common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $15.36 to an employee, of which 33,302 shares vested on each of January 31, 2020 and January 31, 2021 and 33,301 shares will vest on January 31, 2022; |
● | 99,905 shares of restricted class A common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $15.36 to an employee, subject to the achievement of certain performance measures, which will vest on January 31, 2022; |
● | 340,993 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $14.85 to certain employees that vested on January 2, 2021; |
● | 277,048 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value of $16.55 to certain employees, of which 92,349 shares vested on each of January 31, 2020 and January 31, 2021 and 92,350 shares will vest on January 31, 2022; |
● | 48,338 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $16.55 to an employee, subject to the achievement of certain performance measures, which will vest on January 31, 2022; |
● | 11,223 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $17.83 to an employee that vested on February 15, 2020; |
● | 41,181 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value of $22.10 to our non-employee directors that vested on April 30, 2020; |
● | 32,680 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $15.92 to an employee that vested on September 1, 2020; and |
● | Restricted stock units representing 398,000 shares of our common stock with a grant date fair value of $18.21 that vested on June 1, 2020. |
During 2018, we granted under the 2017 EICP:
● | 110,040 shares of restricted Class A common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $12.65 to an employee, of which 36,680 shares vested on each of February 28, 2019 and February 28, 2020 and 36,680 shares will vest February 28, 2021; |
● | 110,040 shares of restricted Class A common stock with a grant date fair value per share of $12.65 to an employee, subject to the achievement of certain performance measures, which will vest on February 28, 2021; |
● | 318,196 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value per share of |
● | 73,640 shares |
As of December 31, 2020, we had 3.0 million shares of common stock and 1.3 million shares of Class A common stock available for issuance under the 2017 EICP. As of December 31, 2020, we had $7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to all non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements. This expense is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.5 years.
A summary of activity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 under our stock based compensation plans is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Grant Date | Number | Grant Date | Number | Grant Date | |||||||||||||||||||
of | Fair Value | of | Fair Value | of | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Per Share | Shares | Per Share | Shares | Per Share | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock - common: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - beginning of period | 977,547 | $ | 15.45 | 578,894 | $ | 13.14 | 503,685 | $ | 11.14 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | 359,481 | 18.92 | 751,463 | 16.07 | 391,836 | 14.63 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vested | (333,865 | ) | 15.35 | (352,810 | ) | 12.98 | (225,570 | ) | 11.21 | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (85,630 | ) | 15.53 | 0 | 0 | (91,057 | ) | 13.27 | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - end of period | 917,533 | $ | 16.84 | 977,547 | $ | 15.45 | 578,894 | $ | 13.14 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted stock - Class A common: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - beginning of period | 449,284 | $ | 13.55 | 407,786 | $ | 11.82 | 462,632 | $ | 10.63 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | 166,814 | 19.87 | 199,810 | 15.36 | 220,080 | 12.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vested | (136,056 | ) | 12.32 | (158,312 | ) | 11.38 | (274,926 | ) | 10.48 | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding - end of period | 480,042 | $ | 16.10 | 449,284 | $ | 13.55 | 407,786 | $ | 11.82 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted stock units - common: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - beginning of period | 398,000 | $ | 18.21 | 0 | $ | 0 | 209,500 | $ | 15.70 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | 93,184 | 18.77 | 398,000 | 18.21 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vested | (374,500 | ) | 18.18 | 0 | 0 | (209,500 | ) | 15.70 | ||||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (26,500 | ) | 18.21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Outstanding - end of period | 90,184 | $ | 18.92 | 398,000 | $ | 18.21 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||
79. Leases
Operating Leases. We lease various assets with non-cancellable lease terms that range between one and 99 years. Many of these leases have optional renewal periods ranging between one and 20 years. We define the lease term as the original lease base period plus optional renewal periods that we reasonably expect to exercise. We do not include renewal periods exercisable more than 10 years from the commencement date in the lease term as we cannot reasonably expect to exercise an option that far into the future. Some of our leases have free rent periods, tenant allowances and/or fixed or variable rent escalators. We record operating lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Operating lease expense is included in operating expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
We lease land, buildings, transmission towers, right of way easements, and equipment through operating leases. We generally lease land for the purpose of erecting transmission towers for our broadcast operations. Our building leases consist of office space and broadcast studios. For transmission towers we do not own, we lease space for our transmission equipment on third-party towers. We lease right-of-ways for various purposes, including ingress and egress for tower locations and guyed wire space. Our equipment leases consist of office, transmission and production equipment.
We allocate consideration paid in the contract to lease and non-lease components based upon the contract or associated invoice received if applicable. Lease components include base rent, fixed rate escalators and in-substance fixed payments associated with the leased asset. Non-lease components include common area maintenance and operating expenses associated with the leased asset. We have not elected the practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components. As such, we only include the lease component in the calculation of right of use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability. The incremental borrowing rate we use for the calculation is the rate of interest that we would pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term based upon our borrower risk profile.
Variable lease payments are not material and are included in operating lease expense as a component of operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations. Variable lease payments are generally associated with usage-based leases and variable payment escalators such as consumer price index increases (“CPI”) incurred after the date of the adoption of ASC 842. Some of our land leases require us to pay a percentage of the revenue earned from leasing space on the towers we erect on the leased land. We included the payment level of CPI and percentage rent amounts at the time of the adoption of ASC 842 in the base rent for calculating the ROU asset and lease liability. CPI adjustments and percentage rent amounts that differ from the amount included in ASC 842 calculation are included in variable lease payments.
We recognize leases with an initial term of 12 months or less as short-term leases and generally consist of rentals of production or broadcast equipment for short periods of time. Lease payments associated with short-term leases are expensed as incurred.
Our operating lease expenses, including variable leases, were $13 million and $11 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Our short-term lease expenses were $1 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Cash flows from operations included cash paid for operating leases of $14 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Additional ROU assets recognized in the year ended December 31, 2020 were $14 million. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average remaining term of our operating leases was 10.75 years. The weighted average discount rate used to calculate the values associated with our operating leases was 6.76%.
The maturities of operating lease liabilities were as follows (in millions):
Year: | ||||
2021 | $ | 11 | ||
2022 | 10 | |||
2023 | 8 | |||
2024 | 7 | |||
2025 | 7 | |||
Thereafter | 41 | |||
Total lease payments | 84 | |||
Less: Imputed interest | (26 | ) | ||
Present value of lease liabilities | $ | 58 |
10. Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between our financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respectiverespective tax bases. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. We recognize the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from a change in tax rates in income in the period that includes the date of the change.
The TCJA was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The TCJA reduced the value of our deferred tax liabilities resulting in the recognition of a tax benefit of approximately $146.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 with a credit to earnings for a reduction of those liabilities. In addition, the TCJA contains significant changes to corporate taxes that will materially affect the taxes owed by us in 2018 and subsequent years. Among other things, the new law reduces the maximum federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, which should have a positive effect on our net earnings and earnings per share. It also limits or eliminates certain deductions to which we have been entitled in past years. It also includes an option to claim accelerated depreciation deductions on qualified property but limits or eliminates certain deductions to which we have been entitled in past years.
The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No.118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the TCJA. We have recognized the provisional tax impacts related primarily to depreciation deductions and included these amounts in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The ultimate impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions we have made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions we may take as a result of the TCJA. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed later in 2018.
Under certain circumstances, we recognize liabilities in our financial statements for positions taken on uncertain tax issues. When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others may be subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, we believe it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 5050% percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits on the balance sheetsheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as income tax expense in the statement of operations.
Federal and state and local income tax expense (benefit) is summarized as follows (in thousands)millions):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Current: | ||||||||||||
Federal | $ | 4,633 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
State and local | 3,261 | 2,730 | 1,259 | |||||||||
State and local - reserve for uncertain tax positions | 757 | (698 | ) | (581 | ) | |||||||
Current income tax expense (benefit) | 8,651 | 2,032 | 678 | |||||||||
Deferred: | ||||||||||||
Federal(1) | (81,666 | ) | 38,214 | 24,067 | ||||||||
State and local | 4,341 | 3,172 | 1,703 | |||||||||
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense | (77,325 | ) | 41,386 | 25,770 | ||||||||
Total income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (68,674 | ) | $ | 43,418 | $ | 26,448 | |||||
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
Current: | ||||||||||||
Federal | $ | 39 | $ | 8 | $ | 43 | ||||||
State and local | 20 | 13 | 11 | |||||||||
Current income tax expense | 59 | 21 | 54 | |||||||||
Deferred: | ||||||||||||
Federal | 64 | 54 | 17 | |||||||||
State and local | 11 | 1 | 6 | |||||||||
Deferred income tax expense | 75 | 55 | 23 | |||||||||
Total income tax expense | $ | 134 | $ | 76 | $ | 77 | ||||||
Significant components of our deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows (in thousands)millions):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Net book value of property and equipment | $ | 18,131 | $ | 26,620 | $ | 92 | $ | 83 | ||||||||
Broadcast licenses, goodwill and other intangibles | 272,330 | 369,275 | ||||||||||||||
Broadcast licenses, goodwill and other intangible assets | 878 | 869 | ||||||||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | 290,461 | 395,895 | 970 | 952 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Liability for accrued vacation | 1,438 | 2,232 | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Liability for accrued bonus | 2,391 | 5,483 | 5 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Loan acquisition costs | 47 | 336 | ||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | 1,170 | 1,168 | ||||||||||||||
Liability under health and welfare plan | 608 | 1,201 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred payroll taxes | 3 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Liability for pension plan | 9,611 | 13,278 | 11 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Federal operating loss carryforwards | - | 20,401 | 38 | 87 | ||||||||||||
State and local operating loss carryforwards | 4,719 | 4,555 | 21 | 31 | ||||||||||||
Alternative minimum tax carryforwards | 3,925 | 386 | ||||||||||||||
Unearned income | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Stock options | 113 | 174 | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs | 2,104 | 3,140 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock | 2,636 | 1,950 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Investments | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense limitation | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Other | 82 | 109 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total deferred tax assets | 28,846 | 54,416 | 100 | 156 | ||||||||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | (75 | ) | (1,532 | ) | (15 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||
Net deferred tax assets | 28,771 | 52,884 | 85 | 142 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities, net of deferred tax assets | $ | 261,690 | $ | 343,011 | $ | 885 | $ | 810 | ||||||||
We As of December 31, 2020, we have approximately $61.6$204 million inof federal operating loss carryforwards, fromwhich expire during the years 2016,2023 which will be fully utilized when we file ourthrough 20172037. tax return. Additionally, we have an aggregate of approximately $101.7 million of various state operating loss carryforwards. We projectexpect to have federal taxable income in the carryforward periods. Therefore,periods, therefore we believe that it is more likely than not that our state netthese federal operating loss carryforwards will be fully utilized.
A valuation allowance has been provided for a portion Additionally, we have an aggregate of the state net operating loss carryforwards. We believe that we will not meet the more likely than not threshold in certain states due to the uncertaintyapproximately $567 million of generating sufficient income. Therefore, the state valuation allowance at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
Our total valuation allowance provided for deferred income tax assets decreased $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 due to changes in estimated utilization ofvarious state operating loss carryforwards. Our total valuation allowance provided for deferred income tax assets decreased $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 due to changes in estimated utilizationcarryforwards, of state operating loss carryforwards.which we expect that approximately half will be utilized.
A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory federal income tax rate and income taxes as reflected in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, 20162019 and 20152018 is as follows (in thousands)millions):
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Statutory federal rate applied to income before income tax expense | $ | 67,647 | $ | 36,992 | $ | 23,012 | $ | 114 | $ | 53 | $ | 60 | ||||||||||||
Current year permanent items | 2,408 | 1,830 | 1,192 | 3 | 13 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit | 7,889 | 5,056 | 2,831 | 27 | 13 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance | (1,457 | ) | (151 | ) | (369 | ) | 1 | (2 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Reserve for uncertain tax positions | 757 | (698 | ) | (581 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Rate change due to enactment of tax reform | (145,997 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating loss carryback | (7 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other items, net | 79 | 389 | 363 | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax (benfit) expense as recorded | $ | (68,674 | ) | $ | 43,418 | $ | 26,448 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense as recorded | $ | 134 | $ | 76 | $ | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Effective income tax (benefit) expense rate | (35.5)% | 41.1% | 40.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effective income tax rate | 25 | % | 30 | % | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
As of each year end, we are required to adjust our pension liability to an amount equal to the funded status of our pension plans with a corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income on a net of tax basis. During 2017,2020, we increased our recorded non-current pension liability by $7.4$10 million and recognized other comprehensive loss of $4.5$8 million, net of a $2.9$2 million tax benefit. During 2016,2019, we increased our recorded non-current pension liability by $0.6$7 million and recognized other comprehensive loss of $0.4$5 million, net of a $0.2$2 million tax benefit. During 2015,2018, we decreased our recorded non-current pension liability by $5.8$1 million and recognized other comprehensive income of $3.5 million, net of a $2.3 million tax expense.$1 million.
In 2017,2016 and 2015, weWe made income tax payments (net of refunds) of $2.0$70 million, $14.6$23 million and $1.8$34 million, respectively. Atduring the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, we had current prepaid income taxes of approximately $13.82019 million and at December 31, 2016, we had current prepaid income taxes of approximately $14.62018, million.respectively.
We prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribution for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.
As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $15 million of unrecognized tax benefits. These unrecognized tax benefits would impact our effective tax rate if recognized. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits is recorded net of any federal tax benefit that would result from payment. We have accrued estimates of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2020, we had recorded a liability for potential penalties and interest of approximately $1 million related to uncertain tax positions. While it is difficult to calculate with any certainty, we estimate no change, exclusive of interest and penalties, will be recorded for uncertain tax positions over the next twelve months.
On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted in response to the COVID-19 global pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, contains modifications on the limitation of business interest for tax years beginning in 2019 and 2020, and permits net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks to offset 100% of taxable income for taxable years beginning before 2021. In addition, the CARES Act allows NOLs incurred in 2018,2019, and 2020 to be carried back to each of the five preceding taxable years to generate a refund of previously paid income taxes. We will continue to monitor and assess the impact the CARES Act may have on our business and financial results. We do not currently expect the CARES Act to have a material impact on our annual estimated effective tax rate.
We file income tax returns in the U.S.United States federal and multiple state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, or state We have net operating losses (historic and local tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2007. This extendedacquired, through recent business combinations) that extend our open adjustment period is duerelated to material amounts of net operating loss carryforwards, which exist at the federal level and in multiple-state jurisdictions arisingstate tax audits from the 20092000 through 2018. The open years vary by entity and 2011 tax years.jurisdiction.
811.. Retirement Plans
We sponsor and contribute to defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans. Our defined benefit pension plan is the Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan (the “Gray(“Gray Pension Plan”). On December 31, 2016, two plans that were assumed in prior years when we acquired the related businesses were merged into the Gray Pension Plan. Monthly plan benefitsBenefits under the Gray Pension Plan are frozen and can no longer increase, and no new participants can be added to the Gray Pension Plan.
The Gray Pension Plan’s funding policy is consistent with the funding requirements of existing federal laws and regulations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The measurement dates used to determine the benefit information for the Gray Pension Plan were December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The following summarizes the Gray Pension Plan’s funded status and amounts recognized on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively (dollars in thousands)millions):
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||
Change in projected benefit obligation: | ||||||||||||||||
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ | 114,976 | $ | 103,199 | $ | 135 | $ | 117 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 4,669 | 4,398 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Actuarial losses | - | 1,839 | ||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss | 16 | 17 | ||||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (3,529 | ) | (2,790 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Merger of assumed plans | 9,970 | 8,330 | ||||||||||||||
Projected benefit obligation at end of year | $ | 126,086 | $ | 114,976 | $ | 151 | $ | 135 | ||||||||
Change in plan assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Fair value of pension plan assets at beginning of year | $ | 80,929 | $ | 69,246 | $ | 97 | $ | 84 | ||||||||
Actual return on plan assets | 7,724 | 5,918 | 12 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Company contributions | 3,124 | 2,775 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (3,529 | ) | (2,790 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Merger of assumed plans | - | 5,780 | ||||||||||||||
Fair value of pension plan assets at end of year | 88,248 | 80,929 | 108 | 97 | ||||||||||||
Funded status of pension plan | $ | (37,838 | ) | $ | (34,047 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (38 | ) | ||||
Amounts recognized on our balance sheets consist of: | ||||||||||||||||
Accrued benefit cost | $ | (1,502 | ) | $ | (5,121 | ) | $ | 10 | $ | 5 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (36,336 | ) | (28,926 | ) | (53 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||
Net liability recognized | $ | (37,838 | ) | $ | (34,047 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (38 | ) | ||||
Because the Gray Pension Plan is a frozen plan, the projected benefit obligation and the accumulated benefit obligation are the same. The accumulated benefit obligation was$126.1 $151 million and $115.0$135 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The long-term rate of return on assets assumption was chosen from a best estimate range based upon the anticipated long-term returns for asset categories in which the Gray Pension Plan is invested. An estimate of the rate of increase in compensation levels used to calculate the net periodic benefit cost is not required because of the Plan’s frozen status:
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the Gray Pension Plan: | ||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 4.11 | % | 4.31 | % | 3.14 | % | 4.16 | % | ||||||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets | 7.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 6.50 | % | ||||||||||
Estimated rate of increase in compensation levels | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations: | ||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 3.55 | % | 4.11 | % | 2.38 | % | 3.14 | % | ||||||||||
Pension expense is computed using the projected unit credit actuarial cost method. The net periodic pension cost for the Gray Pension Plan includes the following components (in thousands)millions):
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic pension cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 3,130 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost | 4,670 | 4,398 | 4,159 | $ | 4 | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (5,648 | ) | (4,836 | ) | (4,782 | ) | (6 | ) | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss | 484 | 406 | 1,580 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic pension (benefit) cost | $ | (494 | ) | $ | (32 | ) | $ | 4,087 | ||||||||||||||||
Net periodic pension benefit | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
For the Gray Pension Plan, the estimated future benefit payments are as follows (in thousands)millions):
Years | Years | Amount | Years | Amount | ||||||||||
2018 | $ | 2,924 | ||||||||||||
2019 | 3,279 | |||||||||||||
2020 | 3,768 | |||||||||||||
2021 | 2021 | 4,047 | 2021 | $ | 4 | |||||||||
2022 | 2022 | 4,324 | 2022 | 4 | ||||||||||
2023 | - | 2027 | 26,680 | 2023 | 5 | |||||||||
2024 | 2024 | 5 | ||||||||||||
2025 | 2025 | 5 | ||||||||||||
| 2026 | - | 2030 | 31 | |||||||||||
The Gray Pension Plan’s weighted-average asset allocations by asset category were as follows:
As of December 31, | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Asset category: | ||||||||||||||||||
Insurance general account | 19 | % | 23 | % | 15 | % | 17 | % | ||||||||||
Cash management accounts | 4 | % | 6 | % | 3 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||
Equity accounts | 42 | % | 39 | % | 48 | % | 47 | % | ||||||||||
Fixed income accounts | 31 | % | 28 | % | 32 | % | 32 | % | ||||||||||
Real estate accounts | 4 | % | 4 | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||
The investment objective is to achieve a consistent total rate of return (income, appreciation, and reinvested funds) that will equal or exceed the actuarial assumption with aversion to significant volatility. The following is the target asset allocation:
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Target Range | ||||||||||||
Asset class: | Strategic Allocation | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | |||||||||
Equities: | ||||||||||||
Large cap value | 5 | % | 0 | % | 50 | % | ||||||
Large cap blend | 5 | % | 0 | % | 50 | % | ||||||
Large cap growth | 5 | % | 0 | % | 50 | % | ||||||
Mid cap blend | 15 | % | 0 | % | 40 | % | ||||||
Small cap core | 5 | % | 0 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Foreign large blend | 10 | % | 0 | % | 40 | % | ||||||
Emerging markets | 10 | % | 0 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Real estate | 5 | % | 0 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
Fixed Income: | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury inflation protected | 5 | % | 0 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Intermediate term bond | 10 | % | 0 | % | 50 | % | ||||||
Long term government bond | 5 | % | 0 | % | 40 | % | ||||||
High yield bond | 10 | % | 0 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Emerging markets bond | 10 | % | 0 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
Money market taxable | 0 | % | 0 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Our equity portfolio contains securities of companies necessary to build a diversified portfolio, and that we believe are financially sound. Our fixed income portfolio contains obligations generally rated A or better with no maturity restrictions and an actively managed duration. The cash equivalents strategy uses securities of the highest credit quality.
Fair Value of Gray Pension Plan Assets. We calculate the fair value of the Gray Pension Plan’s assets based upon the observable and unobservable net asset value of its underlying investments. We utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized by the fair value hierarchy proscribed by Accounting Standards CodificationASU Topic 820, described in Note 45 “Fair Value Measurement.”
The following table presents the fair value of the Gray Pension Plan’s assets and classifies them by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019 respectively (in thousands)millions):
|
As of December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance general account | $ | 0 | $ | 16 | $ | 0 | $ | 16 | ||||||||
Cash management accounts | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Equity accounts | 52 | 0 | 0 | 52 | ||||||||||||
Fixed income accounts | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 | ||||||||||||
Real estate accounts | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 92 | $ | 16 | $ | 0 | $ | 108 | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance general account | $ | - | $ | 16,873 | $ | - | $ | 16,873 | ||||||||
Cash management accounts | 3,229 | - | - | 3,229 | ||||||||||||
Equity accounts | 37,536 | - | - | 37,536 | ||||||||||||
Fixed income accounts | 27,146 | - | - | 27,146 | ||||||||||||
Real estate accounts | 3,464 | - | - | 3,464 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 71,375 | $ | 16,873 | $ | - | $ | 88,248 | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2016 | As of December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance general account | $ | - | $ | 18,357 | $ | - | $ | 18,357 | $ | 0 | $ | 16 | $ | 0 | $ | 16 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash management accounts | 5,089 | - | - | 5,089 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity accounts | 31,963 | - | - | 31,963 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income account | 22,544 | - | - | 22,544 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate accounts | 2,976 | - | - | 2,976 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 62,572 | $ | 18,357 | $ | - | $ | 80,929 | $ | 81 | $ | 16 | $ | 0 | $ | 97 | ||||||||||||||||
Expected Pension Contributions. We expect to contribute a combined total of approximately $2.0$4 million to the Gray Pension Planour frozen defined benefit pension plan during the year ending December 31, 2018.2021.
Capital Accumulation Plan. The Gray Television, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan (the “Capital Accumulation Plan”) is a defined contribution plan intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. EmployerIn 2020, employer contributions under the Capital Accumulation Plan include matching cash contributions at a rate of 100% of the first 3%1% of each employee’s salary deferral, and 50% of the next 2%5% of each employee’s salary deferral. For the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, 20162019 and 2015,2018, our matching contributions to our Capital Accumulation Plan were $6.6approximately $13 million, $5.4$11 million and $1.8$6 million, respectively. We estimate that our matching cash contributions to the Capital Accumulation Plan for year ending December 31, 2018 2021will be approximately $6.8$13 million.
In addition, the Company, at its discretion, may make an additional profit sharingprofit-sharing contribution, based on annual Company performance, to those employees who meet certain criteria. For the years ended December 31, 2017,2020, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company hadwe accrued contributions of $4.1approximately $6 million, $3.4$5 million and $1.6$4 million, respectively, as discretionary profit sharing contributions.
We Each of these discretionary profit-sharing contributions was subsequently made in the form of shares of our common stock. We may also make matching and discretionary contributions of our common stock under the Capital Accumulation Plan. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had 1,587,719960,311 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under this plan. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we made matching contributions of our common stock to the Capital Accumulation Plan as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Matching contributions to the Capital Accumulation Plan | 1,224 | $ | 15 | 2,571 | $ | 29 | 1,898 | $ | 26 | |||||||||||||||
912.. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time wewe may have various contractual and other commitments requiring future payments. These commitments may include amounts required to be paid for: the acquisition of television stations; the purchase of property and equipment; service and other agreements; operating lease commitments for equipment, land and office space; commitments for various syndicated television programs; and commitments under affiliation agreements with networks. Future minimum payments for these commitments, in addition to the liabilities accrued for on our consolidated balance sheetsheets as of December 31, 2017,2020, were as follows (in thousands)millions):
Property | Service and | Syndicated | Network | Service and | Syndicated | Network | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and | Other | Operating | Television | Affiliation | Other | Television | Affiliation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year | Equipment | Agreements | Leases | Programming | Agreements | Total | Agreements | Programming | Agreements | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 3,887 | $ | 2,856 | $ | 3,286 | $ | 6,214 | $ | 176,669 | $ | 192,912 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | - | 749 | 2,651 | 18,330 | 130,014 | 151,744 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | - | - | 2,284 | 12,571 | 140,357 | 155,212 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | - | - | 2,125 | 1,510 | 130,117 | 133,752 | $ | 20 | $ | 10 | $ | 435 | $ | 465 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | - | - | 1,952 | 691 | 2,679 | 5,322 | 16 | 28 | 224 | 268 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 14 | 18 | 229 | 261 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2024 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter | - | - | 5,294 | 451 | - | 5,745 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 3,887 | $ | 3,605 | $ | 17,592 | $ | 39,767 | $ | 579,836 | $ | 644,687 | $ | 83 | $ | 57 | $ | 888 | $ | 1,028 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Leases. We have no material capital leases. Where leases include rent holidays, rent escalations, rent concessions and leasehold improvement incentives, the value of these incentives are amortized over the lease term including anticipated renewal periods. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the associated lease term including anticipated renewal periods. Rent expense resulting from operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $4.0 million, $3.5 million and $2.8 million, respectively.
Legal Proceedings and Claims. We are and expect to continue to be subject to legal actions, proceedings and claims that arise in the normal course of our business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these known actions, proceedings and claims will not materially affect our financial position,condition, results of operations or cash flows, although legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings or events could occur that could negatively affect us, possibly materially.result in materially adverse outcomes.
103. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
During the yearsyears ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we acquired, adjusted and disposed of various television broadcast stations and broadcast licenses. As a result of these transactions, our goodwill and intangible balances increasedchanged during each of these years. See Note 23 “Acquisitions and Dispositions”Divestitures” for more information regarding these transactions. AThe following table presents a summary of changes in our goodwill and other intangible assets, on a net basis for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows (in thousands)millions):
Net Balance at | Net Balance at | Net Balance at | Acquisitions | Net Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | And | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | Acquisitions | Dispositions | Impairment | Amortization | 2017 | 2019 | Adjustments | Impairment | Amortization | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | $ | 485,318 | $ | 125,782 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 611,100 | $ | 1,446 | $ | 14 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,460 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcast licenses | 1,340,305 | $ | 203,503 | (13,105 | ) | - | - | 1,530,703 | 3,573 | 6 | - | - | 3,579 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finite-lived intangible assets | 56,250 | 42,606 | - | - | (25,072 | ) | 73,784 | 460 | 40 | - | (105 | ) | 395 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets net of accumulated amortization | $ | 1,881,873 | $ | 371,891 | $ | (13,105 | ) | $ | - | $ | (25,072 | ) | $ | 2,215,587 | $ | 5,479 | $ | 60 | $ | - | $ | (105 | ) | $ | 5,434 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net Balance at | Net Balance at | Net Balance at | Acquisitions | Net Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | And | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | Acquisitions | Dispositions | Impairment | Amortization | 2016 | 2018 | Adjustments | Impairment | Amortization | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | $ | 423,236 | $ | 72,296 | $ | (10,214 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 485,318 | $ | 612 | $ | 834 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,446 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcast licenses | 1,114,626 | 251,035 | (25,356 | ) | - | - | 1,340,305 | 1,530 | 2,043 | - | - | 3,573 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finite-lived intangible assets | 53,280 | 19,566 | - | - | (16,596 | ) | 56,250 | 53 | 522 | - | (115 | ) | 460 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets net of accumulated amortization | $ | 1,591,142 | $ | 342,897 | $ | (35,570 | ) | $ | - | $ | (16,596 | ) | $ | 1,881,873 | $ | 2,195 | $ | 3,399 | $ | - | $ | (115 | ) | $ | 5,479 | |||||||||||||||||||
AThe following table presents a summary of changes in our goodwill, on a gross basis for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows (in thousands)millions):
| As of | Acquisitions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of | As of | December 31, | And | As of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | Acquisitions | Dispositions | Impairment | December 31, 2017 | 2019 | Adjustments | Impairment | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill, gross | $ | 583,914 | $ | 125,782 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 709,696 | $ | 1,545 | $ | 14 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,559 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated goodwill impairment | (98,596 | ) | - | - | - | (98,596 | ) | (99 | ) | - | - | (99 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net | $ | 485,318 | $ | 125,782 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 611,100 | $ | 1,446 | $ | 14 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,460 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| As of | Acquisitions | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | And | As of | ||||||||||||||
2018 | Adjustments | Impairment | December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||
Goodwill, gross | $ | 711 | $ | 834 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,545 | ||||||||
Accumulated goodwill impairment | (99 | ) | - | - | (99 | ) | ||||||||||
Goodwill, net | $ | 612 | $ | 834 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,446 | ||||||||
AsThe following table presents a summary ofDecember 31, 2017 and 2016, our intangible assets and related accumulated amortization consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):
As of December 31, 2017 | As of December 31, 2016 | As of December 31, 2020 | As of December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Amortization | Net | Gross | Amortization | Net | Gross | Amortization | Net | Gross | Amortization | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets not currently subject to amortization: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadcast licenses | $ | 1,584,402 | $ | (53,699 | ) | $ | 1,530,703 | $ | 1,394,004 | $ | (53,699 | ) | $ | 1,340,305 | $ | 3,633 | $ | (54 | ) | $ | 3,579 | $ | 3,627 | $ | (54 | ) | $ | 3,573 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 611,100 | - | 611,100 | 485,318 | - | 485,318 | 1,460 | 0 | 1,460 | 1,446 | 0 | 1,446 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,195,502 | $ | (53,699 | ) | $ | 2,141,803 | $ | 1,879,322 | $ | (53,699 | ) | $ | 1,825,623 | $ | 5,093 | $ | (54 | ) | $ | 5,039 | $ | 5,073 | $ | (54 | ) | $ | 5,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Network affiliation agreements | $ | 6,134 | $ | (3,551 | ) | $ | 2,583 | $ | 1,264 | $ | (1,264 | ) | $ | - | $ | 67 | $ | (28 | ) | $ | 39 | $ | 56 | $ | (17 | ) | $ | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other finite-lived intangible assets | 143,446 | (72,245 | ) | 71,201 | 105,792 | (49,542 | ) | 56,250 | 644 | (288 | ) | 356 | 615 | (194 | ) | 421 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 149,580 | $ | (75,796 | ) | $ | 73,784 | $ | 107,056 | $ | (50,806 | ) | $ | 56,250 | $ | 711 | $ | (316 | ) | $ | 395 | $ | 671 | $ | (211 | ) | $ | 460 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangibles | $ | 2,345,082 | $ | (129,495 | ) | $ | 2,215,587 | $ | 1,986,378 | $ | (104,505 | ) | $ | 1,881,873 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 5,804 | $ | (370 | ) | $ | 5,434 | $ | 5,744 | $ | (265 | ) | $ | 5,479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $25.1 million, $16.6 million and $12.0 million, respectively. Based on our intangible assets subject to amortization as of December 31, 2017,2020, we expect that amortization expenseof intangible assets for the succeeding five years will be as follows: 2018,2021, $20.6$103 million; 2019,2022, $15.4$99 million; 2020,2023, $12.4$93 million; 2021,2024, $8.3$27 million; and 2022,2025, $4.8$18 million. If and when acquisitions and dispositions occur in the future, actual amounts may vary from these estimates.
Impairment of goodwill and broadcast license. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we tested our goodwill, broadcast licenses and other intangible asset recorded values for potential impairment and concluded that the balances were reasonably stated. As a result, we did not record an impairment expense for our goodwill, broadcast licenses or other intangible assets during 2017,2020, 20162019 or 2015.2018.
CompletionIn the first quarter of FCC Spectrum Auction. On August 7, 2017, we received $90.82020, million resulting fromthe COVID-19 global pandemic and measures to prevent its spread began to affect our relinquishmentbusinesses in a number of ways. In the first quarter of two2020, licenseswe concluded that the uncertainties surrounding this event were a triggering event that required us to evaluate whether or not it was more likely than not that the value of our goodwill and other intangible assets were impaired. Based upon our analysis of both qualitative and quantitative factors, we concluded that such assets were not impaired. We will continue to evaluate both the subjective and objective criteria that may cause us to re-evaluate this conclusion in the FCC’s Spectrum Auction. In connection with this transaction we tendered two of our broadcast licenses and made other modifications to our broadcast spectrum related to our participation in the FCC Spectrum Auction. The cost of the assets disposed of was $13.1 million. The income tax obligations related to this gain have been deferred on a long-term basis.future.
See Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for further discussion of our accounting policies regarding goodwill, broadcast licenses and other intangible assets.
14. Segment Information
During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we operated in two business segments, broadcasting and production companies. During the year ended December 31, 2018 we operated in one segment, broadcasting. The broadcasting segment operates television stations in local markets in the United States. The production companies segment includes the production of television and event content. Costs identified as other are primarily corporate and administrative expenses. The following tables present our business segment information (in millions):
Production | ||||||||||||||||
As of and for the Year ended December 31, 2020: | Broadcasting | Companies | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 2,320 | $ | 61 | $ | 0 | $ | 2,381 | ||||||||
Operating expenses before depreciation, amortization and (gain) loss on disposal of assets, net: | 1,340 | 52 | 65 | 1,457 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 186 | 12 | 3 | 201 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets, net | (31 | ) | 2 | 0 | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,495 | 66 | 68 | 1,629 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 825 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (68 | ) | $ | 752 | ||||||
Interest expense | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 191 | $ | 191 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures (excluding business combinations) | $ | 106 | $ | 4 | $ | 0 | $ | 110 | ||||||||
Goodwill | $ | 1,419 | $ | 41 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,460 | ||||||||
Total assets | $ | 6,631 | $ | 141 | $ | 871 | $ | 7,643 | ||||||||
As of and for the Year ended December 31, 2019: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 2,035 | $ | 87 | $ | 0 | $ | 2,122 | ||||||||
Operating expenses before depreciation, amortization and gain on disposal of assets, net: | 1,325 | 74 | 104 | 1,503 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 180 | 13 | 2 | 195 | ||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net | (54 | ) | 0 | 0 | (54 | ) | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,451 | 87 | 106 | 1,644 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 584 | $ | 0 | $ | (106 | ) | $ | 478 | |||||||
Interest expense | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 227 | $ | 227 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures (excluding business combinations) | $ | 104 | $ | 1 | $ | 5 | $ | 110 | ||||||||
Goodwill | $ | 1,405 | $ | 41 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,446 | ||||||||
Total assets | $ | 6,530 | $ | 153 | $ | 289 | $ | 6,972 | ||||||||
As of and for the Year ended December 31, 2018: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 1,084 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,084 | ||||||||
Operating expenses before depreciation, amortization and gain on disposal of assets, net: | 596 | 0 | 41 | 637 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 74 | 0 | 1 | 75 | ||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net | (17 | ) | 0 | 0 | (17 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating expenses | 653 | 0 | 42 | 695 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 431 | $ | 0 | $ | (42 | ) | $ | 389 | |||||||
Interest expense | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 107 | $ | 107 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures (excluding business combinations) | $ | 68 | $ | 0 | $ | 2 | $ | 70 | ||||||||
Goodwill | $ | 612 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 612 | ||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,763 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,450 | $ | 4,213 | ||||||||
15. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Fiscal Quarter | ||||||||||||||||
First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except for per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2017: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 203,461 | $ | 226,681 | $ | 218,977 | $ | 233,609 | ||||||||
Operating income | 43,558 | 142,555 | 50,024 | 55,089 | ||||||||||||
Net income | 10,505 | 70,561 | 15,316 | 165,570 | ||||||||||||
Basic net income per share | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.98 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 2.15 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.97 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 2.13 | ||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2016: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 173,723 | $ | 196,633 | $ | 204,490 | $ | 237,619 | ||||||||
Operating income | 36,111 | 53,687 | 60,467 | 83,874 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 8,990 | 17,662 | (213 | ) | 35,834 | |||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.25 | $ | - | $ | 0.50 | ||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.24 | $ | - | $ | 0.49 | ||||||||
The following table summarizes our unaudited results of operations on a quarterly basis. The quarterly earnings per share amounts for a year will not necessarily add to the earnings per share for that year due to the weighting of shares used in calculating per share data.
Fiscal Quarter | ||||||||||||||||
First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||
(In millions, except for per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2020: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 534 | $ | 451 | $ | 604 | $ | 792 | ||||||||
Operating income | 124 | 65 | 212 | 351 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | 40 | (2 | ) | 109 | 211 | |||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share | $ | 0.41 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 1.15 | $ | 2.24 | |||||||
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per share | $ | 0.40 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 1.14 | $ | 2.22 | |||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2019: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (less agency commissions) | $ | 518 | $ | 508 | $ | 517 | $ | 579 | ||||||||
Operating income | 40 | 119 | 139 | 180 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders | (31 | ) | 31 | 46 | 81 | |||||||||||
Basic net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders per share | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.82 | |||||||
Diluted net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders per share | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.81 | |||||||
Because of the method used in calculating per share data, the sum of the quarterly per share data will not necessarily equal the per share data as computed for the year.
16. Subsequent Events
Quincy Transaction. On January 31, 2021, we entered into an agreement with Quincy to acquire all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Quincy for $925 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments, including, among other things, adjustments based on a determination of net working capital, cash, transaction expenses and indebtedness, as provided in the purchase agreement. Upon closing the Quincy Transaction, and net of divestitures required to meet regulatory requirements, we will own television stations serving 102 television markets that collectively reach over 25% of US television households, including the number-one ranked television station in 77 markets and the first and/or second highest ranked television station in 93 markets according to Comscore’s average all-day ratings for calendar year 2020.
The completion of the Quincy Transaction is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain customary conditions, including, among others: (i) the receipt of approval from the FCC and the expiration or early termination of the waiting period applicable to the transaction under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended and (ii) the absence of certain legal impediments to the consummation of the Quincy Transaction. We believe that the Quincy Transaction will be completed during the second or third quarter of 2021. Either party may terminate the Quincy purchase agreement if the Quincy Transaction is not consummated on or before January 31, 2022, with an automatic extension to May 1, 2022 if necessary to obtain regulatory approval under the circumstances specified in the Quincy purchase agreement. The purchase agreement includers a provision that we must pay a termination fee of $25 million if the purchase agreement is terminated as a result of a failure to satisfy certain regulatory approvals.
Amendment to 2019 Senior Credit Facility. On February 19, 2021, we entered into the first amendment (the “Amendment”) to our 2019 Senior Credit Facility. The Amendment, among other things, (i) increases availability under the Revolving Credit Facility from an aggregate principal amount of $200 million to an aggregate principal amount of $300 million, (ii) extends the maturity date of borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility to January 2, 2026 and (iii) modifies certain terms of the Revolving Credit Facility relating to the implementation of a LIBOR replacement rate.
Dividend on common stock and Class A common stock. On February 24, 2021, the Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.08 per share of its common stock and Class A common stock. The first dividend is payable on March 31, 2021, to stockholders of record on March 15, 2021.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation ofOur management, including theour Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer, (“CFO”), of the effectivenessperformed an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) ofwhich have been designed to permit us to record, process, summarize and report, within time periods specified by the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the CEOSEC's rules and the CFO haveforms, information required to be disclosed. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that as of the end of such period our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2020 to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or furnish under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and to ensure that such information iswas accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEOour Chief Executive Officer and CFO,Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.disclosure.
Management necessarily applies its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’smanagement’s control objectives. The Company’s management, including the CEO and the CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures can prevent all possible errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. Judgments in decision-making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of one or more persons. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and while our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to be effective under circumstances where they should reasonably be expected to operate effectively, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in any control system, misstatements due to possible errors or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were noDuring the three months ended December 31, 2020, we did not make any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 identified in connection with this evaluation that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have caused us to implement changes in our working environment and possibly our internal controls over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our report, “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the attestation reportpreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies may deteriorate.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 using the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on that evaluation, management believes that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 has been audited by RSM US LLP (RSM), an independent registered public accounting firm, included in “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” arewhich also audited our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2020. RSMs report on our internal control over financial reporting is set forth in Item 8 of thisthe Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9B. Other Information.9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information to be set forth under the headings “Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance - Board Committees and Membership,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2017)2020) is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the information set forth under "Executive Officers of the Registrant""Information about our Executive Officers" in Part I of this Report is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information to be set forth under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Report of Compensation Committee” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information to be set forth under the heading "Stock Ownership"“Stock Ownership” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table gives information about the common stock and Class A common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017:2020:
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information | Equity Compensation Plan Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of securities remaining | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of securities to | Weighted-average | available for future issuance | Number of securities remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||||
be issued upon exercise | exercise price of | under equity compensation | Number of securities to | Weighted-average | available for future issuance | ||||||||||||||||||||
of outstanding options, | outstanding options, | plans (excluding securities | be issued upon exercise | exercise price of | under equity compensation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Plan Category | warrants and rights | warrants and rights | reflected in 1st column) | of outstanding options, | outstanding options, | plans (excluding securities | |||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 274,746 | (1) | $ | 1.99 | 5,560,500 | (2) | - | $ | - | 3,046,637 | (1) | ||||||||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | - | $ | - | - | - | $ | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 274,746 | 5,560,500 | - | 3,046,637 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A Common Stock: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | - | $ | - | 1,923,144 | (3) | - | $ | - | 1,336,440 | (2) | |||||||||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | - | $ | - | - | - | $ | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Total | - | 1,923,144 | - | 1,336,440 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Consists of shares of common stock |
(2) | Consists of |
|
|
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information to be set forth under the headings "Certain“Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions"Transactions” and "Corporate Governance"“Corporate Governance” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information to be set forth under the heading “Ratification of the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2018”2021” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) | List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules: |
(1) | Financial Statements. See Part II, Item 8 for the index to financial statements. |
(2) | Financial statement schedules: The following financial statement schedule of Gray Television, Inc. is included in Item 15(c): Schedule II – Valuation and qualifying accounts. |
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.omitted.
(b) | Exhibits: |
|
| |
Exhibit Number | Description of Documents | |
3.1 | ||
3.2 | ||
4.1 | ||
| ||
Exhibit Number | Description of Documents | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
4.4 | ||
4.5 | ||
4.6 | ||
4.7 | ||
4.8 | ||
4.9 | ||
4.10 | ||
4.11 | ||
4.12 | ||
4.13 |
Exhibit Number | Description of Documents | |
| |
10.7 | |
10.8 | |
10.9 | |
| |
| |
| |
|
Exhibit Number | Description of Documents | |
10.13 | |
21.1 | |
23.1 | |
31.1 | |
31.2 | |
32.1 | |
32.2 | |
101.INS | Inline XBRL |
101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE |
|
| The cover page from Gray Television, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 has been formatted in Inline XBRL. |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or |
(c) | Financial Statement Schedules – The response to this section is submitted as a part of Item 15 (a) (1) and (2). |
GRAY TELEVISION, INC.
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)millions)
Col. A | Col. B | Col. C | Col. D | Col. E | Col. B | Col. C | Col. D | Col. E | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions | Additions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (1) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Charged to | Charged to | Balance at | Balance at | Charged to | Charged to | Balance at | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Costs and | Other | Deductions | End of | Beginning | Costs and | Other | Deductions | End of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | of Period | Expenses | Accounts (a) | (b) | Period | of Period | Expenses | Accounts | (a) | Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2017: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2020: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 3,163 | $ | 2,400 | $ | - | $ | (957 | ) | $ | 4,606 | $ | 11 | $ | 2 | $ | 0 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | $ | 1,532 | $ | (1,457 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 75 | $ | 14 | $ | 1 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2016: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2019: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 1,794 | $ | 1,917 | $ | 167 | $ | (715 | ) | $ | 3,163 | $ | 5 | $ | 11 | $ | 0 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | $ | 1,683 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (151 | ) | $ | 1,532 | $ | 0 | $ | 14 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2018: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 1,667 | $ | 606 | $ | - | $ | (479 | ) | $ | 1,794 | $ | 5 | $ | 2 | $ | 0 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | $ | 2,052 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (369 | ) | $ | 1,683 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
(a) |
|
| Deductions from allowance for doubtful accounts represent write-offs of receivable balances not considered |
Item 16. Form16. FORM 10-K SummarySUMMARY.
None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Gray Television, Inc. | ||
Date: February | By: | /s/ Hilton H. Howell, Jr. |
Hilton H. Howell, Jr., | ||
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: February | By: | /s/ Hilton H. Howell, Jr. |
Hilton H. Howell, Jr., Executive Chairman Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: February |
| /s/ |
Co-Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: February | By: | /s/ |
| ||
Date: February | By: | /s/ |
| ||
Date: February | By: | /s/ |
| ||
Date: February | By: | /s/ |
| ||
Date: February | By: | /s/ |
| ||
Date: February | By: | /s/ |
| ||
Date: February | By: | /s/ |
| ||
| By: | /s/ James C. Ryan |
Date: February 25, 2021 | James C. Ryan, Executive Vice President and | |
Chief Financial Officer | ||
| By: | /s/ Jackson S. Cowart, IV |
Date: February 25, 2021 | Jackson S. Cowart, IV, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
103