5
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020
OR
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 000-53869 001-38408
FNCB BANCORP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Pennsylvania | 23-2900790 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction | (I.R.S. Employer |
102 E. Drinker St., Dunmore, PA | 18512 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (570) 346-7667
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
| Title of Each Class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
| Common Stock $1.25 Par Value | FNCB | Nasdaq Capital Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $1.25 par value
(Title of Class)NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large Accelerated Filer ☐ | Accelerated Filer |
Non-Accelerated Filer | Smaller reporting company |
| Emerging growth company ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its interest control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock of the registrant, held by non-affiliates was $111,754,84697,621,290 at June 30, 2017.
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS
2020.
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 16,766,600 20,238,120 shares of common stock as of March 9, 2018.12, 2021.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 is incorporated by reference into Part III hereof from portions of the Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
| |
Item 1. |
| |
Item 1A. |
| |
Item 1B. |
| |
Item 2. |
|
|
Item 3. |
| |
Item 4. |
| |
|
| |
Item 5. |
| |
Item 6. |
| |
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market |
|
Item 8. |
| |
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
Item 9A. |
| |
Item 9B. |
| |
|
| |
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate |
|
Item 11. |
| |
Item 12. |
| |
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director |
|
Item 14. |
| |
|
| |
Item 15. |
| |
| Item 16. | Form 10-K Summary |
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K may containcontains statements which are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,amended. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to the outlook for which are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on assumptions and may describe future plans, strategies, financial conditions, results of operations and expectations of FNCB Bancorp, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries (“FNCB”(collectively, “FNCB”). These forward-looking statements are generally identified by use of the words “may”, “should”, “will”, “could”, “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project”, “plan”, “future” or similar expressions. All statements in this report, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond FNCB Bancorp’sFNCB’s control and ability to predict, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results of FNCB Bancorp, Inc. to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
● | weakness in the economic environment, in general, and within FNCB's market area could pose significant challenges for FNCB and could adversely affect FNCB's financial condition and results of operations; | |
| ● | FNCB is subject to credit risk, which could adversely affect its profitability; | |
● | FNCB’s concentrations of loans, including those to insiders and related parties, may create a greater risk of loan defaults and losses; | |
| ● | the appraisals and other valuation techniques FNCB uses in evaluating and monitoring loans secured by real property and other real estate owned may not accurately reflect the net value of the asset; | |
● | FNCB’s financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected if the allowance for loan and lease losses is not sufficient to absorb actual losses or if increases to the allowance for loan and lease losses were required; | |
● | if management concludes that the decline in value of any of FNCB’s investment securities is other-than-temporary, FNCB is required to write down the security to reflect credit-related impairments through a charge to earnings; | |
| ● | FNCB’s risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risks or losses to it; | |
● | FNCB is subject to interest rate risk, which could adversely affect its profitability; | |
| ● | changes in interest rates could reduce income, cash flows and asset values; | |
| ● | Uncertainty relating to the expected phase-out of the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") may adversely affect FNCB; | |
| ● | FNCB may not be able to successfully compete with others for business; | |
| ● | changes in either FNCB's financial condition or in the general banking industry could result in a loss of depositor confidence; | |
● | FNCB may not be able to retain or grow its core deposit base, which could adversely impact its funding costs; | |
● | FNCB is a bank holding company and depends on dividends for its subsidiary, FNCB Bank, to operate. | |
| ● | if FNCB loses access to wholesale funding sources, it may not be able to meet the cash flow requirements of its deposits, creditors, and borrowers, or have the operating cash needed to fund corporate expansion and other corporate activities; | |
● | interruptions or security breaches of FNCB's information systems could negatively affect its financial performance or reputation; | |
| ● | FNCB depends on information technology and telecommunications systems of third parties, and any systems failures or interruptions could adversely affect FNCB's operations and financial condition; | |
| ● | FNCB is subject to cybersecurity risks and security breaches and may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks and to respond to cyber incidents, and FNCB may experience harm to its reputation and liability exposure from security breaches; | |
| ● | if FNCB's information technology is unable to keep pace with growth or industry developments or if technological developments result in higher costs or less advantageous pricing, financial performance may suffer; | |
| ● | FNCB relies on management and other key personnel and the loss of any of them may adversely affect its operations; | |
● | FNCB is dependent on the use of data and modeling in both its management’s decision-making generally and in meeting regulatory expectations in particular; | |
● | FNCB’s portfolio of loans to small and mid-sized community-based businesses may increase its credit risk; | |
● | new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services may subject FNCB to additional risk; | |
● | FNCB may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions; | |
| ● | damage to FNCB’s reputation could significantly harm its businesses, competitive position and prospects for growth; | |
| ● | FNCB may be a defendant from time to time in a variety of litigation and other actions, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows; | |
| ● | FNCB depends on the accuracy and completeness of information provided by customers and counterparties; | |
● | FNCB may face risks with respect to future expansion of acquisition activity; | |
| ● | FNCB could be subject to environmental risks and associated costs on its foreclosed real estate assets; |
increases in non-performing assets, which may require FNCB to increase the allowance for loan and lease losses, charge off loans and incur elevated collection and carrying costs related to such non-performing assets;
the impact of adverse economic conditions, particularly in FNCB’s market area, on the performance of its loan portfolio and the demand for its products and services;
the effects of changes in interest rates on demand for FNCB’s products and services;
the effects of changes in interest rates or disruptions in liquidity markets on FNCB Bancorp Inc.’s sources of funding;
the impact of legislative and regulatory changes and the increasing amount of time and resources spent on compliance;
monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, including policies of the U.S. Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve System;
credit risk associated with lending activities and changes in the quality and composition of FNCB’s loan and investment portfolios;
demand for loans, deposits and other products;
the effect of competition on deposit and loan rates and growth and on the net interest margin;
changes in the values of real estate and other collateral securing the loan portfolio, particularly in FNCB Bancorp, Inc.’s market area;
the failure to identify and to address cyber-security risks;
the ability of FNCB Bancorp, Inc. to keep pace with technological changes;
the ability to attract and retain talented personnel;
capital and liquidity strategies, including FNCB Bancorp, Inc.’s ability to comply with applicable capital and liquidity requirements, and its ability to generate capital internally or raise capital on favorable terms;
FNCB Bancorp, Inc.’s reliance on its subsidiary, FNCB Bank, for substantially all of its revenues and its ability to pay dividends or other distributions;
the effects of changes in relevant accounting principles and guidelines on FNCB Bancorp, Inc.’s financial condition; and
the impact from the failure of third party service providers to perform their contractual obligations.
● | the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken to control its spread, will likely continue to adversely impact our employees, customers, business operations and financial results, and the ultimate impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted; | |
● | our participation in the U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") may expose us to certain additional risks, including risks related to alleged noncompliance with PPP rules and regulations, which could have a material adverse impact on FNCB's business, financial condition and results of operations; | |
● | federal and state regulators periodically examine FNCB’s business and may require FNCB to remediate adverse examination findings or may take enforcement action against FNCB; | |
● | FNCB may be required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength for FNCB Bank in times of stress; |
| ● | FNCB is subject to extensive government regulation, supervision and possible regulatory enforcement actions, which may subject FNCB to higher costs and lower shareholder returns; | |
| ● | new or changed legislation or regulation and regulatory initiatives could adversely affect FNCB through increased regulation and increased costs of doing business; | |
| ● | FNCB faces a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations; | |
| ● | FNCB is subject to numerous “fair and responsible” banking laws designed to protect consumers, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions; | |
| ● | FNCB is subject to laws regarding the privacy, information security and protection of personal information and any violation of these laws or another incident involving personal, confidential or proprietary information of individuals could damage FNCB’s reputation and otherwise adversely affect FNCB’s business; | |
| ● | rulemaking changes implemented by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will result in higher regulatory and compliance costs that may adversely affect FNCB’s business; | |
● | the requirements of being a public company may strain FNCB’s resources and divert management's attention; | |
| ● | FNCB Bank's FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments may increase; | |
| ● | the price of FNCB's common stock may fluctuate significantly, which may make it difficult for shareholders to resell shares of common stock at a time or price they find attractive; | |
| ● | the rights of holders of FNCB's common stock to receive liquidation payments and dividend payments are junior to FNCB's existing and future indebtedness and to any senior securities FNCB may issue in the future, and FNCB's ability to declare dividends on, or repurchase shares of, the common stock may become limited; | |
| ● | FNCB may need to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed and on terms favorable to shareholders; | |
| ● | the requirements of being a public company may strain FNCB's resources and divert management's attention; | |
● | as a public company, FNCB incurs significant legal, accounting, insurance, compliance and other expenses. Any deficiencies in FNCB’s financial reporting or internal controls could materially and adversely affect its business and the market price of FNCB’s common stock; | |
● | FNCB’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting may not achieve their intended objectives; | |
● | changes in accounting standards could impact FNCB’s reported earnings; | |
● | anti-takeover provisions in FNCB's charter documents could discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of FNCB's company and diminish the value of FNCB's common stock; | |
● | short sellers of FNCB’s stock may be manipulative and may drive down the market price of FNCB’s common stock; and |
● | other factors and risks described in Part II, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors.” |
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. FNCB Bancorp, Inc. undertakes no obligation, other than as required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Business |
Overview
The Company
FNCB Bancorp, Inc., formerly First National Community Bancorp, Inc., incorporated in 1997, is a Pennsylvania business corporation and a registered bank holding company headquartered in Dunmore, Pennsylvania. FNCB Bancorp, Inc. incorporated in 1997 under its former name, First National Community Bancorp, Inc. and became an active bank holding company on July 1, 1998 when it acquired 100% ownership of the formerFNCB Bank, formerly First National Community Bank.Bank (the "Bank"). In this report, the terms “FNCB,” "the Company," “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to FNCB Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise. In certain circumstances, however, FNCB Bancorp, Inc. uses the term “FNCB” to refer to itself.
Effective June 30, 2016, following receipt of required regulatory approvals from the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities, First National Community Bank completed a charter conversion from a national bank to a Pennsylvania state bank. Following the change in charter, First National Community Bank changed its legal name to FNCB Bank (the “Bank”). Subsequently, on October 4, 2016, the holding company filed an amendment to its articles of incorporation to change its name from First National Community Bancorp, Inc. to FNCB Bancorp, Inc. The name change became effective October 17, 2016.
FNCB’s primary activity consists of owning and operating the Bank, which provides substantially all of FNCB’s earnings as a result offrom its banking services.
FNCB had net income of $0.115.3 million, $6.3$11.1 million, and $35.8$13.3 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015,2020, 2019 and2018, respectively. Total assets were $1.2$1.466 billion at December 31, 2017, $1.22020, $1.204 billion at December 31, 2016,2019 and $1.1$1.238 billion at December 31, 2015.2018.
The Bank
Established as a national banking association in 1910, as of December 31, 20172020 the Bank operated 1817 full-service branch offices within its primary market area, Northeastern Pennsylvania, and a Limited Purpose Banking Office (“LPO”) based in Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
Mission, Vision and Values
FNCB's mission is to make your banking experience simply better. We strive to be a growing, independent bank that is a leader in our community through the power of a strong team with a commitment to financial excellence for our customers and shareholders. We take pride in our core values:
● | Simplicity - Simplifying processes, systems and products to create a better banking experience. |
● | Integrity - Maintaining the highest ethical standards and practices. |
● | Mission - To make your banking experience simply better. |
● | People - A team of employees dedicated to the community, our customers, our shareholders and each other. |
● | Leadership - An organization that grows under the guidance of focused and dedicated leaders. |
● | You - Our values equal YOU! |
Products and Services
Retail Banking
The Bank providesFNCB accomplishes its mission and vision by providing a wide variety of traditional banking products and services to individuals and businesses, including online, mobile and telephone banking, debit cards, check imaging and electronic statements. Deposit products include various checking, savings, money market and certificate of deposit products, as well asincluding a line of preferred products for higher-balance customers. The Bank is a member of IntraFi Network, formerly the Promontory Interfinancial Network, and participates in their Certificate of Deposit Account Registry (“CDARs”) and Insured Cash Sweep (“ICS”) programs, which providesprovide customers with the ability to secure Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance on balances in excess of the standard limitations.
The Bank also offers customers the convenience of 24-hour banking, seven days a week, through FNCB Online Banking (“FNCB Online”) and FNCB Business Online Banking via a secure website, https://www.fncb.com. FNCB’s online product suite includes bill payment, internal and external funds transfer, and POP Money (person to person transfers),Purchase Rewards such as cash-back rewards and Purchase Rewards.other offers. Through FNCB Online, customers can directly access their accounts, open new accounts and apply for a mortgage or obtain a pre-qualification approval through the Bank’s mortgage center. Customers can also access FNCB Online through the Bank’s mobile application.applications. Additionally, through SMS (Text) Message Banking customers can check their account balances, view their last five transactions, transfer funds between eligible accounts and receive alerts. Telephone banking (“Account Link”), a service that provides customers with the ability to access account information and perform related account transfers through the use of a touch tone telephone is also available. FNCB’s mobile deposit, available to personal and business banking customers with online access and an eligible deposit account, allows customers to deposit checks, electronically from start to finish, from anywhere at any time. FNCB also offers its customers mobile payment solutions including Apple Pay®, Samsung Pay® and Google Pay® and electronic transfer solutions through Zelle®, a fast, secure and contact free way to send and receive money between trusted parties. FNCB Business Online Banking also provides business customers the ability to perform wire transfers and payments through ACH transactions, and process direct deposit payroll transactions for employees, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, from their place of business.
In addition, customers can access money from their deposit accounts by using their debit card to make purchases or withdraw cash from any automated teller machines (“ATMs”) including ATMs located in each of the Bank’s branch offices as well as additional locations. FNCB’s mobile deposit, available to personal bankingFNCB is a member of AllPoint, the largest surcharge-free ATM network. AllPoint provides FNCB customers with access to over 55,000 ATMs, free of charge worldwide, as well as a convenient mobile application to find the location of ATMs within the network. FNCB Online and an eligible deposit account,also provides its customers with CardValet®, a mobile application that allows customers to deposit checks, electronically from start to finish, from anywhere at any time.
FNCB Business Online Banking is a menu driven product that provides the Bank’s business customers direct access to their account information anddebit cardholders the ability to perform internalreceive fraud alert messages and external account transfers, wire transfersmanage when, where and payments through ACH transactions, and process direct deposit payroll transactions for employees, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, fromhow their place of business.debit card is used.
The Bank also offers business customers remote deposit capture and merchant services, as well as business debit cards.cards and Purchasing cards ("PCards"). Remote deposit capture provides business customers the ability to process daily check deposits to their accounts through an online image capture environment. The Bank offers business customers merchant payment processing solutions, including state-of-the-art credit card terminals, integrated payment systems and a dedicated account manager. Business customers can also access money from their deposit account by using their “business” debit card, providing a faster, more convenient way to make purchases, track business expenses and manage finances. PCards offer business customers the ability to earn a cash rebate on all purchases as well as additional functionality and reporting to effectively manage their expenses and procurement.
The Bank offers several overdraft protection products including Bounceits retail and business customers FNCB Bank Overdraft Protection to protect against the cost and inconvenience of returned checks. Customers can also apply for an Instant Money andloan or transfer from another FNCB checking or savings account, which provide customers with an added level of protection against unanticipated overdrafts due to cash flow emergencies and account reconciliation errors.
Lending Activities
FNCB offers a variety of loans, including residential real estate loans, construction, land acquisition and development loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, loans to state and political subdivisions, and consumer loans, generally to individuals and businesses in its primary market area. These lending activities are described in further detail below.
Residential Mortgage Loans and and Home Equity Term Loans and Lines of Credit
FNCB offers a variety of fixed-rate one- to four-family1-4 family residential loans, home equity term loans and home equity term loans.lines of credit ("HELOCs"). FNCB’s suite of residential mortgage products include First Time Homebuyer mortgages, FHA and Home Possible® mortgages with low down payments to meet the home financing needs of customers. Home equity term loans have fixed interest rates with terms of up to 15 years. HELOCs have adjustable interest rates based on the prime interest rate for the United States and are offered up to a maximum combined loan-to-value ratio of 90%, based on the property’s appraised value. FNCB also offers a proprietary “WOW” mortgage, a first-lien, fixed-rate mortgage product with maturity terms ranging from 7.5 to 14.519.5 years. At December 31, 2017, one- to four-family2020, 1-4 family residential mortgage loans, including home equity term loans and HELOCs totaled $158.0$196.3 million, or 20.6%21.7%, of the total loan portfolio. Except for the WOW mortgage, one- to four-family1-4 family mortgage loans are originated generally for sale in the secondary market. However, FNCB may hold in portfolio one- to four-family1-4 family residential mortgage loans as deemed necessary according to current asset/liability management strategies. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Bank sold $12.4$13.9 million of one- to four-family1-4 family mortgages. FNCB retains servicing rights on these mortgages.
Construction, Land Acquisition and Development Loans
FNCB offers interim construction financing secured by residential property for the purpose of constructing one- to four-family1-4 family homes. FNCB also offers interim construction financing for the purpose of constructing residential developments and various commercial properties including shopping centers, office complexes and single purpose owner-occupied structures and for land acquisition. At December 31, 2017,2020, construction, land acquisition and development loans amounted to $21.0$59.8 million and represented 2.7%6.6% of the total loan portfolio.
Commercial Real Estate Loans
Commercial real estate loans represent the largest portion of FNCB’s total loan portfolio and loans in this portfolio generally have larger loan balances. These loans are secured by a broad range of real estate, including but not limited to, office complexes, shopping centers, hotels, warehouses, gas stations, convenience markets, residential care facilities, nursing care facilities, restaurants, multifamily housing, farms and land subdivisions. At December 31, 2017,2020, FNCB’s commercial real estate loans totaled $261.8$273.9 million, or 34.1%30.3%, of the total loan portfolio.
Commercial and Industrial Loans
FNCB generally offers commercial loans to sole proprietors and businesses located in its primary market area. The commercial loan portfolio includes, but is not limited to, lines of credit, dealer floor plan lines, equipment loans, vehicle loans and term loans. These loans are primarily secured by vehicles, machinery and equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, marketable securities and deposit accounts. At December 31, 2017,2020, FNCB’s commercial and industrial loans totaled $150.1$238.4 million, or 19.5%26.4%, of the total loan portfolio. Also included in commercial and industrial loans are loans originated during 2020 under various programs that were part of the governmental response to the COVID-19 pandemic. FNCB participated in the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") promulgated under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act"). PPP loans outstanding included in commercial and industrial loans were $78.6 million at December 31, 2020. FNCB also participated in the Federal Reserve System's Main Street Lending Program under which the Federal Reserve purchased 95.0% of the originated principal balance. The remaining 5.0% principal of loans originated under the Main Street Lending Program outstanding and included in commercial and industrial loans at December 31, 2020 was $4.3 million.
Consumer Loans
Consumer loans include bothindirect automobile loans originated through various auto dealers in the Bank's market area, secured and unsecured installment loans, direct new and used automobile financing, home equity and personal lines of credit and overdraft protection loans. The Bank is also in the business of underwriting indirect auto loans which are originated through various auto dealers in its market area. Home equity lines of credit have adjustable interest rates based on the National prime interest rate and are offered up to a maximum combined loan-to-value ratio of 90%, based on the property’s appraised value. At December 31, 2017,2020, FNCB’s consumer loans totaled $134.7$85.9 million, or 17.5%9.5%, of the total loan portfolio.
State and Political Subdivision Loans
FNCB originates state and political subdivision loans, including general obligation and tax anticipation notes, primarily to municipalities in the Bank’s market area. At December 31, 2017,2020, FNCB’s state and political subdivision loans totaled $42.5$49.0 million, or 5.5%5.4%, of the total loan portfolio.
For more information regarding FNCB’s loan portfolio and lending policies, please refer toSee Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 5, "Loans" to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, of"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for additional information regarding FNCB's loan portfolio and lending policies.
Wealth Management
FNCB offers customers wealth management services through a revenue share agreement with a third-party provider. Customers are able to access alternative deposit products such as mutual funds, annuities, stocks, and bonds directly for purchase from an outside provider. FNCB receives a percentage of the commission revenue generated from these transactions.
Deposit Activities
In general, deposits, borrowings and loan repayments are the major sources of funding for lending and other investment purposes. FNCB relies primarily on marketing, product innovation, technology and service to attract, grow and retain its deposits. Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of deposit accounts, management considers the interest rates offered by its competitors, the interest rates available on FHLBFederal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh ("FHLB") advances and other wholesale funding, its liquidity needs and customer preferences. Management regularly reviews FNCB’s deposit mix and deposit pricing as part of its asset/liability management, taking into consideration rates offered by competitors in its market area and balance sheet interest-rate sensitivity.
Competition
The banking and financial services industries are highly competitive. FNCB faces direct competition in originating loans and in attracting deposits from a significant number of financial institutions operating in its market area, many with a statewide or regional presence, and in some cases, a national presence, as well as other financial and non-financial institutions outside of its market area through online loan and deposit product offerings. The competitionCompetition comes principally from other banks, savings institutions, credit unions, mortgage banking companies, internet-based financial technology (“FinTech”) companies and, with respect to deposits, institutions offering investment alternatives, including money market funds and online deposit accounts. The increased competition has resulted from changes in the legal and regulatory guidelines, as well as from economic conditions. The cost of regulatory compliance remains high for community banks as compared to their larger competitors that are able to achieve economies of scale.
As a result of consolidation in the banking industry, some of the Bank’s competitors and their respective affiliates are larger and may enjoy advantages such as greater financial resources, a wider geographic presence, a wider array of services, or more favorable pricing alternatives and lower origination and operating costs. FNCB considers its major competitors to be local commercial banks as well as other commercial banks with branches in its market area. Competitors may offer deposits at higher rates and loans with lower fixed rates, more attractive terms and less stringent credit structures than FNCB has been able to offer. The growth and profitability of FNCB depends on its continued ability to successfully compete. Management believes interest rates on deposits, especially money market and time deposits, and interest rates and fees charged on loans within FNCB’s market area to be very competitive.
Supervision and Regulation
FNCB participatesand the Bank operate in a highly regulated industry and isare subject to a variety of statutes, regulations and policies, as well as ongoing regulatory supervision and review. Federal statutes that apply to FNCB and the Bank include the Gramm Leach Bliley Act (“GLB Act”), the Bank Holding Company Act (“BHCA”), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the USA Patriot Act, the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. In general, these statutes, regulations promulgated in accordance with these statutes, and interpretations of the statutes and regulations by the banking regulatory agencies establish the eligible business activities of FNCB and the Bank, certain acquisition and merger restrictions, limitations on intercompany transactions, such as loans and dividends, and capital adequacy requirements, among other things. These laws, regulations and policies are subject to frequent change and FNCB takes measures to comply with applicable requirements. The following summarizes some of the more significant provisions of these laws as they relate to FNCB and the Bank.
FNCB
FNCB is a bank holding company within the meaning of the BHCA and is registered with, and subject to regulation and examination by, the Reserve Bank and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”). FNCB is required to file annual and quarterly reports with the FRB and to provide the FRB with such additional information that they may require. BHCA and other federal laws subject bank holding companies to restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe and unsound banking practices.
The BHCA requires approval of the FRB for, among other things, the acquisition of direct or indirect ownership or control of more than five percent (5%) of the voting securities or substantially all the assets of any bank or bank holding company, or before the merger or consolidation with another bank holding company.
With certain limited exceptions, a bank holding company is prohibited from acquiring control of any voting shares of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging directly or indirectly in any activity other than banking or managing or controlling banks or furnishing services to or performing services for its authorized subsidiaries. A bank holding company may, however, engage in, or acquire an interest in a company that engages in, activities that the FRB has determined by order or regulation to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be properly incidentincidental thereto. In making such a determination, the FRB is required to consider whether the performance of such activities can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as convenience, increased competition or gains in efficiency, which outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest or unsound banking practices. The FRB is also empowered to differentiate between activities commenced de novo and activities commenced by the acquisition, in whole or in part, of a going concern. Some of the activities that the FRB has determined by regulation to be closely related to banking include making or servicing loans, performing certain data processing services, acting as a fiduciary or investment or financial advisor, and making investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare.
Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on any extensions of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, or investments in the stock or other securities thereof, and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. Further, a holding company and any subsidiary bank are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with the extension of credit. A subsidiary bank may not extend credit, lease or sell property, or furnish any services, or fix or vary the consideration for any of the foregoing on the condition that: (i) the customer obtain or provide some additional credit, property or services from or to such bank other than a loan, discount, deposit or trust service; (ii) the customer obtain or provide some additional credit, property or service from or to the bank holding company or any other subsidiary of the bank holding company; or (iii) the customer not obtain some other credit, property or service from competitors, except for reasonable requirements to assure the soundness of credit extended.
The GLB Act allows a bank holding company or other company to certify status as a financial holding company, which allows such company to engage in activities that are financial in nature, that are incidental to such activities, or are complementary to such activities without further approval. FNCB is not a financial holding company. The GLB Act enumerates certain activities that are deemed financial in nature, such as underwriting insurance or acting as an insurance principal, agent or broker, underwriting, dealing in or making markets in securities, and engaging in merchant banking under certain restrictions. The GLB Act also authorizes the FRB to determine by regulation what other activities are financial in nature, or incidental or complementary thereto. FNCB has not elected to be treated as a financial holding company.
FNCB also is subject to the jurisdictionperiodic reporting requirements and anti-fraud regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and is subject to the disclosure and regulatory requirements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and, in connection with the offer and sale of securities, including FNCB's securities, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On December 29, 2017, FNCB filed an application with The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) requesting listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market®. FNCB subsequently received approval from Nasdaq on February 26, 2018 to list its common shares for trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market®. FNCB’s shares of common stock began tradingare listed on the Nasdaq effective withStock Market under the market opening on Monday, March 5, 2018. As such,symbol "FNCB." Accordingly, FNCB is now subject to certain financial, liquidity and corporate governance requirements imposed by Nasdaq. Non-compliance of these requirements could subject FNCB to potential denial of listing, or additional conditions, as necessary, to protect investors and the public interest. Prior to March 5, 2018, FNCB’s shares of common stock traded on the OTCQX marketplace under the symbol “FNCB”.
The Bank
Effective June 30, 2016, upon its conversion to a state charter, the Bank is regulated by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities (“PADOBS”). The Bank’s deposit accounts are insured up to the maximum legal limit by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC and accordingly, the Bank is also regulated by the FDIC. The regulations of the PADOBS and the FDIC govern most aspects of the Bank’s business, including required reserves against deposits, loans, investments, mergers and acquisitions, borrowings, dividends and location and number of branch offices. The laws and regulations governing the Bank generally have been promulgated to protect depositors and the Deposit Insurance Fund, and not for protectingto protect shareholders.
Branching and Interstate Banking. The federal banking agencies are generally authorized to approve interstate bank merger transactions without regard to whether such transactions are prohibited by the law of any state, unless the home state of one of the banks has opted out of the interstate bank merger provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “Riegle-Neal Act”) by adopting a law after the date of enactment of the Riegle-Neal Act and before June 1, 1997 that applies equally to all out-of-state banks and expressly prohibits merger transactions involving out-of-state banks. Interstate bank mergers are also subject to the nationwide and statewide insured deposit concentration limitations described in the Riegle-Neal Act.transactions.
The Dodd-Frank Act permits national and stateamended federal banking law to permit banks to establish de novo branches in other states to the same extent as a bank chartered by that state would be so permitted. Previously, banks could only establish branches in other states if the host state expressly permitted out-of-state banks to establish branches in that state. Pennsylvania law had previously permitted banks chartered in Pennsylvania to establish branches in other states without limitation, thereby permitting national banks in Pennsylvania to establish branches anywhere in the state, but only permitted out of state banks to branch in Pennsylvania if the home state of the out-of-state bank permits Pennsylvania banks to establish de novo branches. The interstate banking and branching provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act could resultfederal banking laws would permit the Bank to merge with banks in moreother states and branch into other states and would also permit banks from other states establishing to acquire banks in the Bank's market area and to establish de novo branches in the Bank’s market area.
USA Patriot Act and the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”). Under the BSA, a financial institution is required to have systems in place to detect certain transactions, based on the size and nature of the transaction. Financial institutions are generally required to report cash transactions involving more than $10,000 to the United States Treasury. In addition, financial institutions are required to file suspicious activity reports for transactions that involve more than $5,000 and that the financial institution knows, suspects or has reason to suspect, involvesinvolve illegal funds, isare designed to evade the requirements of the BSA or hashave no lawful purpose. Under the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act, commonly referred to as the “USA Patriot Act” or the “Patriot Act,” financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactions and account relationships, as well as enhanced due diligence standards intended to detect, and prevent, the use of the United States financial system for money laundering and terrorist financing activities. The Patriot Act requires financial institutions, including banks, to establish anti-money laundering programs, including employee training and independent audit requirements, meet minimum specified standards, follow minimum standards for customer identification and maintenance of customer identification records, and regularly compare customer lists against lists of suspected terrorists, terrorist organizations and money launderers.
Capital Adequacy Requirements. Federal banking agencies have adopted risk basedrisk-based capital adequacy and leverage capital adequacy requirements pursuant to which they assess the adequacy of capital in examining and supervising banks and bank holding companies and in analyzing bank regulatory applications. Risk-based capital requirements determine the adequacy of capital based on the risk inherent in various classes of assets and off-balance sheet items.
Effective January 1, 2015, FNCB and the BankFinancial institutions are subject to extensive and detailed capital requirements, which generally follow a framework of rules adopted by the Basel III regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act (“Committee on Banking Supervision commonly referred to as Basel III”).III. Basel III calls for the following capital requirements:
● | A minimum ratio of common equity tier I (“CET I”) capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5%. | |
● | A minimum ratio of |
● | A minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8%. | |
● | A minimum |
|
| |
|
|
Basel III also establishesprovides for a “countercyclical "capital conservation buffer" of 2.5% above the regulatory minimum capital requirements for each of the CET I, tier I capital, and total capital ratios. The buffer” that is designed must consist entirely of CET I capital. As a result, if a banking organization does not have a CET I, Tier I capital, and total capital ratios of at least 7.0%, 8.5% and 10.5%, respectively, its ability to absorb losses during periodsmake or commit to discretionary dividends and discretionary bonus payments to "executive officers" or engage in share repurchases or redemptions generally will be restricted in accordance with a pre-determined "maximum payout ratio." Under the maximum payout ratio formula, a banking organization with a capital conservation buffer of economic stress. Generally,less than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets would become subject to increasingly restrictive limitations on covered distributions (as a percentage of eligible retained income) as the capital conservation buffer of 2.50% of risk-weighted assets, when fully phased in, will be imposed when federal banking regulators determine that excess aggregate credit growth becomes associated with a buildup of systemic risk. For all banking institutions, the phase-in period for the capital conservation buffer requirement began on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% and will increase by that amount each year until it reaches 2.50% on January 1, 2019.decreases.
Banking institutions with a ratio of CET I to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer (or below the combined capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer, when the latter is applied) may face constraints on their ability to pay dividends, to effect equity repurchases and pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers, which constraints vary based on the amount of the shortfall.
Basel III also included, as part of the definition of CET I capital, a requirement that banking institutions include the amount of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), which primarily consists of unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale securities, that are not other than temporarily impaired (“OTTI”) in calculating regulatory capital, unless the institution makesmade a timely, one-time opt-out election from this provision in connection with the filing of its first regulatory reports after applicability of the Basel III Rule to that institution. The Basel III Rule also imposes a 4.00% minimum Tier I leverage ratio. Upon implementation of Basel III on January 1, 2015,provision. FNCB and the Bank elected to exclude AOCI in calculating regulatory capital with the filing of their respective first regulatory reports after applicability of Basel III.capital.
Basel III provides for new deductions from and adjustments to CET I. These include, for example, under current rules, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets dependent upon future taxable income and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET I to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10.00%25.00% of CET I or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15.00% of CET I.
Basel III also imposed changes to methodologies for determining risk weighted assets, including revisions to recognition of credit risk mitigation, such as a greater recognition of financial collateral and a wider range of eligible guarantors, the risk weighting of equity exposures and past due loans, and higher (greater than 100%) risk weighting for certain commercial real estate exposures that have higher credit risk profiles, including higher loan to value and equity components.
On November 21, 2017,As noted in the federal banking regulatory agencies jointly issued a final rulediscussion below relating Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, the FRB, effective August 30, 2018, raised the threshold of its "Small Bank Holding Company" exemption to extend the 2017 transition provisions under Basel III for certainapplication of consolidated capital deductions and risk weights as well as certain minority interest requirements for banking organizations not subjectqualifying small bank holding companies from $1 billion to the advanced approaches capital rules, including: mortgage servicing assets; deferred tax$3 billion of consolidated assets. Consequently, qualifying bank holding companies having less than $3 billion of consolidated assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks; significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions; and non-significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions; and significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions that are not in the form of common stock. FNCB and the Bank are not subject to the advanced approachesconsolidated capital rule.requirements unless otherwise directed by the FRB.
As discussed below, Basel III also integrates the new capital requirements into the prompt corrective action provisions under
Prompt Corrective Action. Under Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”("FDIA").
Prompt Corrective Action. Under Section 38 of the FDIA,, each federal banking agency is required to implement a system of prompt corrective action for institutionsan insured institution which it regulates. The federal banking agencies have promulgated substantially similar regulations, which integrate Basel III capital requirements, to implement the system of prompt corrective action established by Section 38 of the FDIA.
The following are the capital requirements under the Basel III Rulesas integrated into the prompt corrective action category definitions. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the following capital requirements were applicable to the Bank for purposes of Section 38 of the FDIA.
Total | Tier I | |||||||||||
Risk-Based | Risk-Based | CET I | Leverage | Tangible Equity | ||||||||
Capital Category | Capital Ratio | Capital Ratio | Capital Ratio | Ratio | to Assets | |||||||
Well capitalized | >/= 10.0% | >/= 8.0% | >/= 6.5% | >/= 5.0% | N/A | |||||||
Adequately capitalized with | >/= | >/= | >/= | >/= 4.0% | N/A | |||||||
Adequately capitalized | >/= 8.0% | >/= 6.0% | >/= 4.5% | >/= 4.0% | N/A | |||||||
Undercapitalized | < 8.0% | < 6.0% | < 4.5% | < 4.0% | N/A | |||||||
Significantly undercapitalized | < 6.0% | < 4.0% | < 3.0% | < 3.0% | N/A | |||||||
Critically undercapitalized | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Less than 2.0% |
Additionally, FNCB’s outstanding subordinated notes are subject to phase out and will cease to qualify as capital for regulatory purposes. Overall, management believes that implementation of Basel III did not have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s or the Bank’s capital ratios, earnings, shareholder’s equity, or its ability to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. At December 31, 2017,2020, the Bank was “well capitalized” under the aforementionedapplicable requirements with a common equityCET I capital and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets ratios (for the Bank only) of 14.54%, a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 15.79% and a leverage ratio of 9.57%. Similarly, at December 31, 2019, FNCB exceeded capital requirements for an institution to be considered "well capitalized" with CET I capital and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets ratios of 11.36%13.70%, a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 12.49%14.77% and a Leverageleverage ratio of 8.24%10.36%. Similarly, at December 31, 2017, FNCB met its capital requirements with a common equity Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of 9.74%, a Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10.66%, a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 12.08%, and a Leverage ratio of 7.74%.
Regulatory Enforcement Authority. Federal banking law grants substantial enforcement powers to federal banking regulators. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed with regulatory authorities.
The Bank and its “institution-affiliated parties,” including its management, employees, agents, independent contractors, consultants such as attorneys and accountants and others who participate in the conduct of the financial institution’s affairs, are subject to potential civil and criminal penalties for violations of law, regulations or written orders of a governmental agency. In addition, regulators are provided with greater flexibility to commence enforcement actions against institutions and institution-affiliated parties. Possible enforcement actions include the termination of deposit insurance and cease-and-desist orders. Such orders may, among other things, require affirmative action to correct any harm resulting from a violation or practice, including restitution, reimbursement, indemnifications or guarantees against loss. A financial institution may also be ordered to restrict its growth, dispose of certain assets, rescind agreements or contracts, or take other actions as determined by the ordering agency to be appropriate.
Under provisions of the federal securities laws, a determination by a court or regulatory agency that certain violations have occurred at a company or its affiliates can result in fines, restitution, a limitation of permitted activities, disqualification to continue to conduct certain activities and an inability to rely on certain favorable exemptions. Certain types of infractions and violations can also affect a public company in its timing and ability to expeditiously issue new securities into the capital markets.
The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss allowances for regulatory purposes.
The Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act made significant changes to the bank regulatory structure and affects the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act has required a number of federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new rules and regulations, and to prepare various studies and reports for Congress. The federal agencies have been given significant discretion in drafting these rules and regulations. To date, the following provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act are considered to be of the greatest significance to FNCB:
● | expands the |
|
|
● |
|
● | provides mortgage reform provisions regarding a |
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
|
● | requires that holding companies and other companies that directly or indirectly control an insured depository institution serve as a source of financial |
● |
|
● | permits national and state banks to establish interstate branches to the same extent as the branch host state allows establishment of in-state branches. |
President Donald J. Trump has indicated that one of the goals of his administration is to reduce federal government regulation, including, among other things, reconsidering certain regulations promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Act. On February 3, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order that directs the Secretary of the Treasury Department to consult with the heads of the member agencies of the Financial Stability Oversight Council and report to President Trump on the extent to which the laws and regulations governing the U.S. financial system are in accord with certain enumerated “core principles” (the “Executive Order”). The “core principles” set forth in the Executive Order relate to U.S. financial system regulation, and include fostering economic growth and vibrant financial markets through more rigorous regulatory impact analysis, and making “regulation more efficient, effective and appropriately tailored.” More recently, the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate have both considered legislation that would roll-back or eliminate portions of the Dodd-Frank Act, and a bipartisan bill, “The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act,” has been introduced in the Senate which includes a roll back of certain key provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. At this time, it is not possible to predict whether any legislation will be enacted that amends the Dodd-Frank Act or, if enacted, what provisions the legislation would include or the impact of any such legislation on FNCB and the Bank.
C
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB, which is granted broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Consumer Financial Privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and certain other statutes. The CFPB has examination and primary enforcement authority with respect to depository institutions with $10 billion or more in assets. Smaller institutions are subject to rules promulgated by the CFPB but continue to be examined and supervised by federal banking regulators for consumer compliance purposes. The CFPB has authority to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive practices in connection with the offering of consumer financial products. TheFor example, the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFPB to establish certain minimum standards for the origination of residential mortgages including, in certain circumstances, a determination of the borrower’s ability to repay. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act allows certain borrowers to raise certain defenses to foreclosure if they receive any loan other than a “qualified mortgage” as defined by the CFPB. The Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and standards that are more stringent than those adopted at the federal level and, in certain circumstances, permits state attorneys general to enforce compliance with both the state and federal laws and regulations.
Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgage RuleRule.
Pursuant to the Dodd FrankDodd-Frank Act in 2014, the CFPB issued a final rule on January 10, 2013, which became effective January 10, 2014, amendingamended Regulation Z, as implemented byimplementing the Truth in Lending Act, requiring mortgage lenders to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for acertain mortgage loanloans has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms. MortgageIn connection with certain mortgage loan transactions, lenders are required to determine consumers’ ability to repay in one of two ways. The first alternative requires the mortgage lender to consider the following eight underwriting factors when making the credit decision:
current or reasonably expected income or assets;
current employment status;
the monthly payment on the covered transaction;
the monthly payment on any simultaneous loan;
the monthly payment for mortgage-related obligations;
current debt obligations, alimony, and child support;
the monthly debt-to-income ratio or residual income; and
credit history.
● | current or reasonably expected income or assets; |
● | current employment status; |
● | the monthly payment on the covered transaction; |
● | the monthly payment on any simultaneous loan; |
● | the monthly payment for mortgage-related obligations; |
● | current debt obligations, alimony, and child support; |
● | the monthly debt-to-income ratio or residual income; and |
● | credit history. |
Alternatively, the mortgage lender can originate “qualified mortgages,” which are entitled to a presumption that the creditor making the loan satisfied the ability-to-repay requirements. In general, a “qualified mortgage” is a mortgage loan without negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, or terms exceeding 30 years. In addition, to be a qualified mortgage, the points and fees paid by a consumer cannot exceed 3% of the total loan amount. Loans which meet these criteria will be considered qualified mortgages, and as a result generally protect lenders from fines or litigation in the event of foreclosure. Qualified mortgages that are “higher-priced” (e.g. subprime loans) garner a rebuttable presumption of compliance with the ability-to-repay rules, while qualified mortgages that are not “higher-priced” (e.g. prime loans) are given a safe harbor of compliance. The final rule as issued, did not have a material impact on our lending activities or our results of operations or financial condition.
TILA/RESPA Integrated Disclosures (“TRID”).On October 3, In 2015, the CFPB implemented a final rule combining the mortgage disclosures consumers previously received under TILA and RESPA. For more than 30 years, the TILA and RESPA mortgage disclosures had been administered separately by, respectively, the Federal Reserve BoardFRB and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The final rule requires lenders to provide applicants with the new Loan Estimate and Closing Disclosure and generally applies to most closed-end consumer mortgage loans for which the creditor or mortgage broker receives an application on or after October 3, 2015.loans.
The CFPB’s rulemaking, examination and enforcement authority has and will continue to significantly affect financial institutions offering consumer financial products and services, including FNCB and the Bank. These regulatory activities may limit the types of financial services and products the Bank may offer, which in turn may reduce FNCB’s revenues.
FDIC Insurance Premiums. The FDIC maintains aUnder the FDIC's risk-based assessment system, for determininginsured institutions were previously assigned one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain other factors. An institution's assessment rate depended largely on the category to which it was assigned, with institutions deemed less risky paying lower FDIC deposit insurance premiums. Four risk categories (I-IV), each subject to different premium rates, are established based upon an institution’s status as well capitalized, adequately capitalized or undercapitalized, and the institution’s supervisory rating.
The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increasedrequired the maximumFDIC to revise its procedures to base deposit insurance amount for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor. The Dodd-Frank Act also broadened the base for FDIC insurance assessments. Assessments are now basedassessments on a financial institution’s average consolidatedeach insured institution's total assets less tangible equity capital. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the FDIC to increase the reserve ratioinstead of deposits and also mandated that the Deposit Insurance Fund from 1.15% toachieve a reserve ratio of 1.35% of insured deposits by 2020September 2020. The FDIC calculates assessments for most banks on certain financial measures and eliminatessupervisory ratings derived from statistical modeling estimating the requirement thatprobability of failure over three years, and also set maximum rates for institutions with composite CAMELS ratings of 1 or 2 and minimum rates for other institutions. In June 2020, the FDIC pay dividendsadopted rules to insured depositorymake certain adjustments to the assessment calculation to mitigate the effects of insurance deposit assessments for institutions whenparticipating in the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminatedPPP adopted under the statutory prohibition against the payment of interest on business checking accounts.CARES Act.
An insured institution is required to pay deposit insurance premiums on its assessment base in accordance with its risk category. There are three adjustments that can be made to an institution’s initial base assessment rate: (1) a potential decrease for long-term unsecured debt, including senior and subordinated debt and, for small institutions, a portion of Tier I capital; (2) a potential increase for secured liabilities above a threshold amount; and (3) for non-Risk Category I institutions, a potential increase for brokered deposits above a threshold amount. The FDIC may also impose special assessments from time to time.
At December 31, 2017,2020, the Bank was considered risk category I,in the lowest risk category, for deposit insurance assessments and paid an annual assessment rate ranging from0.0005 basis points to 0.0006 basis points on the assessment base of average consolidated total assets less the average tangible equity during the assessment period.
Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act. The Economic Growth. Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in May 2018 (the “Regulatory Relief Act”), amended certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as certain other statutes administered by the federal banking agencies. Some of the key provisions of the Regulatory Relief Act as it relates to community banks and bank holding companies include: (i) designating mortgages held in portfolio as “qualified mortgages” for banks with less than $10 billion in assets, subject to certain documentation and product limitations; (ii) exempting banks with less than $10 billion in assets (and total trading assets and trading liabilities of 5% or less of total assets) from Volcker Rule requirements relating to proprietary trading; (iii) simplifying capital calculations for banks with less than $10 billion in assets by requiring federal banking agencies to establish a community bank leverage ratio of tangible equity to average consolidated assets of not less than 8% or more than 10%, and provide that banks that maintain tangible equity in excess of such ratio will be deemed to be in compliance with risk-based capital and leverage requirements; (iv) assisting smaller banks with obtaining stable funding by providing an exception for reciprocal deposits from FDIC restrictions on acceptance of brokered deposits; (v) raising the eligibility for use of short-form Call Reports from $1 billion to $5 billion in assets; (vi) clarifying definitions pertaining to high volatility commercial real estate loans (HVCRE), which require higher capital allocations, so that only loans with increased risk are subject to higher risk weightings; and (vii) changing the eligibility for use of the small bank holding company policy statement from institutions with under $1 billion in assets to institutions with under $3 billion in assets.
In September 2019, the federal banking agencies approved the final rule to implement the provisions of Section 201 of the Regulatory Relief Act. Under the new rule, which became effective January 1, 2020, a qualifying community banking organization is defined as a depository institution or depository institution holding company with less than $10 billion in assets. A qualifying community banking organization has the option to elect the Community Bank Leverage Ratio ("CBLR") framework if its CBLR is greater than 9%, it has off-balance sheet exposures of 25% or less of consolidated assets, and trading assets and liabilities of 5% or less of total consolidated assets. The leverage ratio for purposes of the CBLR is calculated as Tier I capital divided by average total assets, consistent with the manner banking organizations calculate the leverage ratio under generally applicable capital rules. Qualifying community banking organizations that exceed the CBLR level established by the agencies, and that elect to be covered by the CBLR framework, will be considered to have met: (i) the generally applicable leverage and risk-based capital requirements under the banking agencies’ capital rules; (ii) the capital ratio requirements necessary to be considered “well capitalized” under the banking agencies’ prompt corrective action framework in the case of insured depository institutions; and (iii) any other applicable capital or leverage requirements. For institutions that fall below the 9% capital requirement but remain above 8%, are allowed a two-quarter grace period to either meet the qualifying criteria again or to comply with the generally applicable capital rules.As a result of the CARES Act, during 2020 the CBLR was reduced to 8.0% for the remainder of 2020 and set at 8.5% for 2021. FNCB has not elected to use the CBLR framework at this time and does not believe that the changes resulting from the Regulatory Relief Act, including whether it elects to use the CBLR framework in the future, will materially impact FNCB’s business, operations, or financial results.
Dividend and Share Repurchase Restrictions
FNCB Bancorp, Inc. is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. FNCB Bancorp, Inc.’s revenues (on a parent company only basis) and its ability to pay dividends to its shareholders, or repurchase shares from its shareholders, are almost entirely dependent upon the receipt of dividends from the Bank. The right of FNCB, Bancorp, Inc., and consequently the rights of its creditors and shareholders to participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings of any subsidiary through the payment of such dividends or otherwise is necessarily subject to the prior claims of creditors of the subsidiary (including depositors) except to the extent that claims of FNCB, Bancorp, Inc., in its capacity as a creditor, may be recognized. Additionally, the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to FNCB Bancorp, Inc. is subject to Pennsylvania state law and various regulatory restrictions.
The declaration of cash dividends on FNCB’s common stock, or the repurchase of shares of its common stock, is at the discretion of its board of directors, and any decision to declare a dividend, or repurchase shares, is based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, earnings, prospects, financial condition, regulatory capital levels, applicable covenants under any credit agreements, notes and other contractual restrictions, Pennsylvania law, federal bank regulatory law, and other factors deemed relevant.
EmployeesHuman Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2017,2020, FNCB, including the Bank, employed 242214 persons, including 2523 part-time employees.FNCB's employees support its vision to be a leader in the community with a commitment to financial excellence for customers and shareholders and deliver its mission to make your banking experience simply better.
Available Information
FNCB files reports, proxy and information statements and other information electronically with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials that FNCB files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information may be obtained on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website site address is https://www.sec.gov. FNCB makes its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments thereto available through its website at https://www.fncb.com.www.fncb.com. The information contained on our website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These reports may also be obtained free of charge as soon as practicable after filing or furnishing them to the SEC upon request by sending an email to corporatesecretary@fncb.com. Information may also be obtained via written request to FNCB Bancorp, Inc. Attention: Chief Financial Officer, 102 East Drinker Street, Dunmore, PA 18512.
Risk Factors |
The operations and financial results of FNCB like other financial companies, isare subject to a number ofvarious risks that may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations, many of which are outside of our direct control. Among theseand uncertainties, including those described below. The risks are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The risk factors discussed below, which could materially affect FNCB’s business, operating results or financial condition, should be considered in addition to the other information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. However, the risk factorsand uncertainties described below are not meant to be all inclusive.the only ones FNCB faces. Additional risks and uncertainties FNCB is unaware of, or currently believes are not currently known or that FNCB currently deems to be insignificantmaterial, may also materially adversely affect itsbecome important factors affecting FNCB. If any of the following risks occur, FNCB’s business, financial condition, operating results or financial condition.and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the price of the FNCB’s common stock could decline.
Credit RiskRisks Related to FNCB’s Business
Weakness in the economic environment,, in general, and within FNCB’smarket area could pose significant challenges for FNCB and could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
FNCB’sFNCB’s success depends primarily on the general economic conditions in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the specific local markets in which it operates. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, FNCB provides banking and financial services to customers primarily in the Lackawanna, Luzerne, Lehigh and Wayne County markets. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for FNCB’s products and services as well as the ability of customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans, and the stability of deposit funding sources. A significant decline in general economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, severe weather or natural disasters, outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic occurrences, unemployment, changes in securities markets or other factors could impact these local economic conditions and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, weakness in economic conditions could result in one or more of the following:
A decrease in the demand for FNCB’s loans and other products and services;
A decrease in customer savings generally and in the demand for FNCB’s savings and other deposit products; and
An increase in the number of customers and counterparties who become delinquent, file for protection under bankruptcy laws, or default on their loans or other obligations.
● | A decrease in the demand for FNCB's loans and other products and services; |
● | A decrease in customer savings generally and in the demand for FNCB's savings and other deposit products; and |
● | An increase in the number of customers and counterparties who become delinquent, file for protection under bankruptcy laws, or default on their loans or other obligations. |
An increase in the number of delinquencies, bankruptcies, or defaults could result in a higher level of non-performing assets, net charge-offs, and provision for loan and lease losses. The markets we serveFNCB serves are dependent on retail and service-related businesses and, thus, are particularly vulnerable to adverse changes in economic conditions affecting these sectors.
As of December 31, 2017, approximately 36.8% of FNCB’s loan portfolio consisted of commercial real estate loans and construction, land acquisition and development loans. These types of loans are generally viewed as having a higher risk of default than residential real estate loans or consumer loans. These types of loans are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans. Because FNCB’s loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial real estate loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in non-performing loans. All non-performing loans totaled $2.6 million, or 0.3% of total gross loans, as of December 31, 2017, and $2.2 million, or 0.3% of total gross loans, as of December 31, 2016. Although non-performing loans as a percentage of gross loans remained steady from the prior year, an increase in non-performing loans in the future could result in an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses and an increase in loan charge-offs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s financial condition and results of operations. The lending activities in which the Bank engages carry the risk that the borrowers will be unable to perform on their obligations. As such, general economic conditions, nationally and in FNCB’s primary market area, will have a significant impact on its results of operations. To the extent that economic conditions deteriorate, business and individual borrowers may be less able to meet their obligations to the Bank in full, in a timely manner, resulting in decreased earnings or losses to the Bank. To the extent that loans are secured by real estate, adverse conditions in the real estate market may reduce the ability of the borrowers to generate the necessary cash flow for repayment of the loan, and reduce the ability to collect the full amount of the loan upon a default. To the extent that the Bank makes fixed-rate loans, general increases in interest rates will tend to reduce its spread as the interest rates FNCB must pay for deposits would increase while interest income is flat. Economic conditions and interest rates may also adversely affect the value of property pledged as security for loans.
FNCB is subject to credit risk, which could adversely affect its profitability.
FNCB’s business depends on its ability to successfully measure and manage credit risk. As a lender, FNCB is exposed to the risk that the principal of, or interest on, a loan will not be paid timely or at all or that the value of any collateral supporting a loan will be insufficient to cover FNCB’s outstanding exposure. In addition, FNCB is exposed to risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks relating to loan underwriting, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, and risks inherent in dealing with individual loans and borrowers. The creditworthiness of a borrower is affected by many factors including local market conditions and general economic conditions. If the overall economic climate in the United States generally, or in the market areas in which FNCB operates specifically, experiences material disruption, FNCB’s borrowers may experience difficulties in repaying their loans, the collateral FNCB holds may decrease in value or become illiquid, and FNCB’s level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise and require significant additional provisions for loan losses.
FNCB’s risk management practices, such as monitoring the concentrations of its loans and its credit approval, review and administrative practices, may not adequately reduce credit risk, and FNCB’s credit administration personnel, policies and procedures may not adequately adapt to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting related customers and the quality of the loan portfolio. Many of FNCB’s loans are made to small businesses that are less able to withstand competitive, economic and financial pressures than larger borrowers. Consequently, FNCB may have significant exposure if any of these borrowers becomes unable to pay their loan obligations as a result of economic or market conditions, or personal circumstances, such as divorce, unemployment or death. A failure to effectively measure and limit the credit risk associated with FNCB’s loan portfolio may result in loan defaults, foreclosures and additional charge-offs, and may necessitate that FNCB significantly increase its allowance for loan losses, each of which could adversely affect FNCB’s net income. As a result, FNCB’s inability to successfully manage credit risk could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
FNCB’sFNCB’s loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial real estate loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in non-performing loans.
As of December 31, 2020, approximately 36.9% of FNCB’s loan portfolio consisted of commercial real estate loans and construction, land acquisition and development loans. These types of loans are generally viewed as having a higher risk of default than residential real estate loans or consumer loans. These types of loans are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans. Because FNCB’s loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial real estate loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in non-performing loans. All non-performing loans totaled $5.6 million, or 0.62% of total gross loans, as of December 31, 2020, and $9.1 million, or 1.10% of total gross loans, as of December 31, 2019. Specifically, commercial real estate loans that were non-performing totaled $3.2 million, or 0.36%, of total gross loans, as of December 31, 2020, and $5.6 million, or 0.68%, of total gross loans, as of December 31, 2019. There were no construction, land acquisition and development loans that were non-performing at December 31, 2020 and 2019. An increase in non-performing loans in the future could result in an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses and an increase in loan charge-offs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s financial condition and results of operations. The lending activities in which the Bank engages carry the risk that the borrowers will be unable to perform on their obligations. As such, general economic conditions, nationally and in FNCB’s primary market area, will have a significant impact on its results of operations.
FNCB’s concentrations of loans, including those to insiders and related parties, may create a greater risk of loan defaults and losses.
A substantial portion of FNCB’sFNCB’s loans are secured by real estate in the Northeastern Pennsylvania market, and substantially all of its loans are to borrowers in that area. FNCB also has a significant amount of commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, construction, land acquisition and development loans and land-related loans for residential and commercial developments. At December 31, 2017, $462.22020, $530.0 million, or 60.2%58.7%, of gross loans were secured by real estate, primarily commercial real estate. Management has taken steps to mitigate commercial real estate concentration risk by diversification among the types and characteristics of real estate collateral properties, sound underwriting practices, and ongoing portfolio monitoring and market analysis. Of total gross loans, $21.0$59.8 million, or 2.7%6.6%, were construction, land acquisition and development loans. Construction, land acquisition and development loans have the highest risk of uncollectability. An additional $150.1$238.4 million, or 19.5%26.4%, of portfolio loans were commercial and industrial loans not secured by real estate. Historically, commercial and industrial loans generally have had a higher risk of default than other categories of loans, such as single family residential mortgage loans. The repayment of these loans often depends on the successful operation of a business and are more likely to be adversely affected by adverse economic conditions. While management believes that the loan portfolio is well diversified in terms of borrowers and industries, these concentrations expose FNCB to the risk that adverse developments in the real estate market, or in the general economic conditions in its general market area, could increase the levels of non-performing loans and charge-offs, and reduce loan demand. In that event, FNCB would likely experience lower earnings or losses. Additionally, if, for any reason, economic conditions in its market area deteriorate, or there is significant volatility or weakness in the economy or any significant sector of the area’s economy, FNCB’s ability to develop business relationships may be diminished, the quality and collectability of its loans may be adversely affected, the value of collateral may decline and loan demand may be reduced.
Commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and construction, land acquisition and development loans tend to have larger balances than single family mortgage loans and other consumer loans. Because FNCB’sFNCB’s loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans and construction, land acquisition and development loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans may cause a significant increase in non-performing assets. An increase in non-performing loans could result in a loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses, or an increase in loan charge-offs, which could have an adverse impact on FNCB’s results of operations and financial condition.
Guidance adopted by federal banking regulators provides that banks having concentrations in construction, land development or commercial real estate loans are expected to have and maintain higher levels of risk management and, potentially, higher levels of capital, which may adversely affect shareholder returns, or require FNCB to obtain additional capital sooner than it otherwise would. Excluded from the scope of this guidance are loans secured by non-farm nonresidential properties where the primary source of repayment is the cash flow from the ongoing operations and activities conducted by the party, or affiliate of the party, who owns the property.
Outstanding loans and line of credit balances to directors, officers and their related parties totaled $55.6$98.9 million as of December 31, 2017.2020. At December 31, 2017,2020, there were no loans to directors, officers and their related parties that were categorized as criticized loans within the Bank’s risk rating system, meaning they are not considered to present a higher risk of collection than other loans. For more information regarding loans to officers and directors and/or their related parties, please refer toSee Note 11, “Related Party Transactions” to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" and Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for more information regarding loans to officers and directors and/or their related parties.
FNCB’s portfolio of loans to small and mid-sized community-based businesses may increase its credit risk.
Many of FNCB’s commercial business and commercial real estate loans are made to small business or middle market customers. These businesses generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities and have a heightened vulnerability to economic conditions. If general economic conditions in the market area in which FNCB operates negatively impact this important customer sector, FNCB’s results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. Moreover, a portion of these loans have been made by FNCB in recent years and the borrowers may not have experienced a complete business or economic cycle. The deterioration of FNCB’s borrowers’ businesses may hinder their ability to repay their loans with FNCB, which could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s financial condition and results of operations.
The appraisals and other valuation techniques FNCB uses in evaluating and monitoring loans secured by real property and other real estate owned may not accurately reflect the net value of the asset.
In considering whether to make a loan secured by real property, FNCB generally requires an appraisal of the property. However, an appraisal is only an estimate of the value of the property at the time the appraisal is made, and, as real estate values may change significantly in relatively short periods of time (especially in periods of heightened economic uncertainty), this estimate may not accurately reflect the net value of the collateral after the loan is made. As a result, FNCB may not be able to realize the full amount of any remaining indebtedness when FNCB forecloses on and sells the relevant property. In addition, FNCB relies on appraisals and other valuation techniques to establish the value of other real estate owned (“OREO”), that FNCB acquires through foreclosure proceedings and to determine loan impairments. If any of these valuations are inaccurate, FNCB’s financial statements may not reflect the correct value of FNCB’s OREO, if any, and FNCB’s allowance for loan losses may not reflect accurate loan impairments. Inaccurate valuation of OREO or inaccurate provisioning for loan losses could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
FNCB’sFNCB’s financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected if the ALLL is not sufficient to absorb actual losses or if increases to the ALLL were required.
The lending activities in which the Bank engages carry the risk that the borrowers will be unable to perform on their obligations, and that the collateral securing the payment of their obligations may be insufficient to assure repayment. FNCB may experience significant credit losses, which could have a material adverse effect on its operating results. Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of FNCB’sFNCB’s loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of its borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of its loans, which it uses as a basis to estimate and establish its reserves for losses. In determining the amount of the ALLL, management reviews loans, loss and delinquency experience, and evaluates current economic conditions. If these assumptions prove to be incorrect, the ALLL may not cover inherent losses in FNCB’s loan portfolio at the date of its financial statements. Material additions to FNCB’s allowance or extensive charge-offs would materially decrease its net income. At December 31, 2017,2020, the ALLL totaled $9.0 $11.9million, representing 1.17%1.33% of total loans.
Although management believes FNCB’sFNCB’s underwriting standards are adequate to manage normal lending risks, it is difficult to assess the future performance of its loan portfolio due to the ongoing economic environment and the state of the real estate market. The assessment of future performance of the loan portfolio is inherently uncertain. FNCB can give no assurance that non-performing loans will not increase or that non-performing or delinquent loans will not adversely affect its future performance.
In addition, federal and state regulators periodically review the ALLL and may require increases to the ALLL or further loan charge-offs. Any increase in ALLL or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory agencies could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’sFNCB’s results of operations and financial condition.
If management concludes that the decline in value of any of FNCB’sFNCB’s investment securities is other-than-temporary, FNCB is required to write down the security to reflect credit-related impairments through a charge to earnings.
Management reviews FNCB’sFNCB’s investment securities portfolio at each quarter-end reporting period to determine whether the fair value is below the current carrying value. When the fair value of any of FNCB’s debt investment securities has declined below its carrying value, management is required to assess whether the decline represents an OTTI. If management concludes that the decline is other-than-temporary, it is required to write down the value of that security to reflect the credit-related impairments through a charge to earnings. Changes in the expected cash flows of securities in FNCB’s portfolio and/or prolonged price declines in future periods may result in OTTI, which would require a charge to earnings. Due to the complexity of the calculations and assumptions used in determining whether an asset is impaired, any impairment disclosed may not accurately reflect the actual impairment in the future. In addition, to the extent that the value of any of FNCB’s investment securities is sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates, any increase in interest rates may result in a decline in the value of such investment securities.
FNCB held approximately $2.8$1.7 million in capital stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”)FHLB as of December 31, 2017.2020. FNCB must own such capital stock to qualify for membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank system which enables it to borrow funds under the FHLB advance program. If the FHLB were to cease operations, FNCB’s business, financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Market RiskFNCB’s risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risks or losses.
FNCB’s risk management framework is comprised of various processes, systems and strategies, and is designed to manage the types of risk to which FNCB is subject, including, among others, credit, market, liquidity, interest rate and compliance. FNCB’s framework also includes financial or other modeling methodologies that involve management assumptions and judgment. FNCB’s risk management framework may not be effective under all circumstances and may not adequately mitigate any risk or loss to FNCB. If FNCB’s risk management framework is not effective, FNCB could suffer unexpected losses and its business, financial condition, results of operations or growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected. FNCB may also be subject to potentially adverse regulatory consequences.
FNCB is subject to interest rate risk, which could adversely affect its profitability.
FNCB’s profitability, like that of most financial institutions, depends to a large extent on its net interest income, which is the difference between its interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and its interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings.
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond FNCB’s control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the Federal Reserve. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest FNCB receives on loans and securities and the interest FNCB pays on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could affect FNCB’s ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, the fair value of FNCB’s financial assets and liabilities, and the average duration of FNCB’s assets. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, FNCB’s net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. Any substantial, unexpected or prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse impact on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
FNCB uses simulation analysis to model net interest income for various interest rate scenarios over a five-year time horizon. Based on the simulation analysis, FNCB’s interest sensitivity profile at December 31, 2020 was characterized by maturities or repricing of assets and liabilities that were well matched over the next 12 months, moving to an asset sensitivity position in subsequent years of the model. Accordingly, based on its interest sensitivity profile, FNCB would expect net interest income to remain at current levels if interest rates rise over the next 12 months. However, net interest income is projected to trend upwards over the life of the simulation due primarily to higher replacement rates on loans and securities exceeding funding cost increases quarter over quarter. Conversely, if interest rates decrease over the next 12 months, FNCB would expect net interest income projected to trend downward over the life of the simulation due primarily to lower replacements rates on loans and securities exceeding funding cost decreases quarter over quarter. These simulations are based on numerous assumptions, including but not limited to: the nature and timing of interest rate levels, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit decay rates, pricing decisions on loans and deposits, reinvestment of asset and liability cash flows, customer behavior in a rising rate environment and other factors. When short-term interest rates rise, the rate of interest FNCB pays on its interest-bearing liabilities may rise more quickly than the rate of interest that FNCB receives on its interest-earning assets, which may cause FNCB’s net interest income to decrease.
Additionally, a shrinking yield premium between short-term and long-term market interest rates, a pattern usually indicative of investors' waning expectations of future growth and inflation, commonly referred to as a flattening of the yield curve, typically reduces FNCB’s profit margin as FNCB borrows at shorter terms than the terms at which FNCB lends and invests.
In addition, an increase in interest rates could also have a negative impact on FNCB’s results of operations by reducing the ability of borrowers to repay their current loan obligations. These circumstances could not only result in increased loan defaults, foreclosures and charge-offs, but also reduce collateral values and necessitate further increases to the allowance for loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in interest rates could reduce income, cash flows and asset values.
FNCB’sFNCB’s earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon its net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond FNCB’s control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the FRB. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest FNCB receives on loans and securities and the amount of interest it pays on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) FNCB’s ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of FNCB’s financial assets and liabilities, and (iii) the average duration of FNCB’s mortgage-backed securities portfolio.
If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and investments, FNCB’sFNCB’s net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. Any substantial, unexpected, prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s financial condition and results of operations.
Uncertainty relating to the expected phase-out of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) may adversely affect FNCB.
LIBOR has been used extensively in the United States as a reference rate for various financial contracts, including adjustable-rate loans, asset-backed securities, and interest rate swaps. In 2017, the Chief Executive of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") will not compel panel banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The announcement means that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot be guaranteed after 2021. In November 2020, the FCA announced that most tenors of US Dollar LIBOR would continue to be published through June 30, 2023, which would allow additional legacy U.S. Dollar LIBOR contracts to mature before the succession of LIBOR. At this time, no consensus exists as to what rate or rates may become acceptable alternatives to LIBOR, and it is impossible to predict the effect of any such alternatives on the value of LIBOR-based variable rate loans and other securities or financial arrangements, given LIBOR's current role in determining market interest rates globally. The uncertainty as to the nature and effect of such reforms and actions relating to the discontinuance of LIBOR may adversely affect the value of and return on certain of our financial assets and liabilities that are based on or are linked to LIBOR, which may adversely affect FNCB's results of operations or financial condition. In addition, LIBOR-related reforms may also require changes to the agreements that govern these LIBOR-based products, as well as FNCB's internal systems and processes.
FNCB may not be able to successfully compete with others for business.
FNCB competes for loans, deposits and investment dollars with numerous regional and national banks and other community banking institutions, online divisions of banks located in other markets as well as other kinds of financial institutions and enterprises, such as securities firms, insurance companies, savings associations, credit unions, mortgage brokers, private lenders and Fintech companies. There is also competition for banking business from competitors outside of its market area. As noted above, FNCB and the Bank are subject to extensive regulations and supervision, including, in many cases, regulations that limit the type and scope of activities. Many competitors have substantially greater resources and may offer certain services that FNCB and the Bank does not provide, and operate under less stringent regulatory environments. The differences in available resources and applicable regulations may make it harder for FNCB to compete profitably, reduce the rates that it can earn on loans and investments, increase the rates it must offer on deposits and other funds, and adversely affect its overall financial condition and earnings. For additional discussion of FNCB’s competitive environment, referRefer to the section entitled “Business – Competition” included in Item 1, of"Business" to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for an additional discussion of FNCB's competitive environment.
Liquidity Risk
Changes in either FNCB’sFNCB’s financial condition or in the general banking industry could result in a loss of depositor confidence.
Liquidity is the ability to meet cash flow needs on a timely basis at a reasonable cost. The Bank uses its liquidity to extend credit and to repay liabilities as they become due or as demanded by customers. The Board of Directors establishes liquidity policies, including contingency funding plans, and limits and management establishes operating guidelines for liquidity. FNCB’s primary source of liquidity is customer deposits. The continued availability of this funding source depends on customer willingness to maintain deposit balances with banks in general and FNCB in particular. The availability of deposits can also be impacted by regulatory changes (e.g. changes in FDIC insurance, the liquidity coverage ratio, etc.), changes in the financial condition of FNCB, or the banking industry in general, and other events which can impact the perceived safety and soundness or economic benefits of bank deposits. While FNCB makes significant efforts to consider and plan for hypothetical disruptions in ourFNCB’s deposit funding through the use of liquidity stress testing, market related, geopolitical, or other events could impact the liquidity derived from deposits.
FNCB may not be able to retain or grow its core deposit base, which could adversely impact its funding costs.
Like many financial institutions, FNCB relies on customer deposits as its primary source of funding for its lending activities, and FNCB continues to seek customer deposits to maintain this funding base. FNCB’s future growth will largely depend on its ability to retain and grow its deposit base. As of December 31, 2020, FNCB had $1.287 billion in deposits. FNCB’s deposits are subject to potentially dramatic fluctuations in availability or price due to certain factors outside of its control, such as increasing competitive pressures for deposits, changes in interest rates and returns on other investment classes, customer perceptions of its financial health and general reputation, and a loss of confidence by customers in FNCB or the banking sector generally, which could result in significant outflows of deposits within short periods of time or significant changes in pricing necessary to maintain current customer deposits or attract additional deposits. Any such loss of funds could result in lower loan originations, which could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
FNCB is a bank holding company and depends on dividends from its subsidiary, FNCB Bank, to operate.
FNCB is an entity separate and distinct from the Bank. The Bank conducts most of ourFNCB’s operations and FNCB depends upon dividends from the Bank to service FNCB's debt, pay FNCB’s expenses and to pay dividends to FNCB's shareholders. The availability of dividends from the Bank is limited by various statutes and regulations. It is possible, depending upon the financial condition including liquidity and capital adequacy of the Bank and other factors, that the Bank’s regulators could limit the payment of dividends or other payments to FNCB by the Bank. In the event that the Bank was unable to pay dividends and would be unable to repurchase its shares, FNCB in turn would likely have to reduce or stop paying dividends to its shareholders. Failure to pay dividends to FNCB shareholders could have a material adverse effect on the market price of ourFNCB’s Common Stock. For additional information regarding dividend restrictions, refer to the section entitled “Regulatory Matters” included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If we loseFNCB loses access to wholesale funding sources,, we it may not be able to meet the cash flow requirements of ourits depositors, creditors, and borrowers, or have the operating cash needed to fund corporate expansion and other corporate activities.
Wholesale funding sources include brokered deposits, reciprocal and one-way CDARS and ICS deposits, federal funds lines of credit, securities sold under repurchase agreements, non-core deposits, and long-term debt. The Bank is also a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh,FHLB, which provides members access to funding through advances collateralized with certain qualifying assets within the Bank’s loan portfolio. In addition, FNCB’s available-for-sale securities provide an additional source of liquidity. Disruptions in availability of wholesale funding can directly impact the liquidity of FNCB and the Bank. The inability to access capital markets funding sources as needed could adversely impact FNCB’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and level of regulatory-qualifying capital.
Operational and Legal Risk
Interruptions or security breaches of FNCB’sFNCB’s information systems could negatively affect its financial performance or reputation.
In conducting its business, FNCB relies heavily on its information systems. FNCB collects and stores sensitive data, including proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of its customers and employees, in its data centers and on its networks. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to FNCB’sFNCB’s operations and business strategy. Maintaining and protecting those systems is difficult and expensive, as is dealing with any failure, interruption or breach of those systems. Despite security measures, FNCB’s information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to security breaches, cyber-attacks by hackers or breaches due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any damage, failure or breach could cause an interruption in operations. Computer break-ins, phishing and other disruptions could also jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through FNCB’s computer systems and network infrastructure. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or breaches could damage FNCB’s reputation, disrupt operations and the services provided to customers, cause a loss of confidence in the products and the services provided, cause FNCB to incur additional expenses, result in a loss of customer business and data, result in legal claims or proceedings, result in liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, result in regulatory penalties, or expose FNCB to other liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations and competitive position.
FNCB depends on information technology and telecommunications systems of third parties, and any systems failures or interruptions could adversely affect FNCB’s operations and financial condition.
FNCB’s business depends on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of its information technology and telecommunications systems. FNCB outsources many of its major systems, such as data processing, deposit processing, loan origination, email and anti-money laundering monitoring systems. The failure of these systems, or the termination of a third party software license or service agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt FNCB’s operations, and FNCB could experience difficulty in implementing replacement solutions. In many cases, FNCB’s operations rely heavily on secured processing, storage and transmission of information and the monitoring of a large number of transactions on a minute-by-minute basis, and even a short interruption in service could have significant consequences. Because FNCB’s information technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third party systems, FNCB could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third party systems fail or experience interruptions. If significant, sustained or repeated, a system failure or service denial could compromise FNCB’s ability to operate effectively, damage FNCB’s reputation, result in a loss of customer business and subject FNCB to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, failure of third parties to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or fraud or misconduct on the part of employees of any of these third parties, could disrupt FNCB’s operations or adversely affect FNCB’s reputation.
FNCB is subject to cybersecurity risks and security breaches and may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks and to respond to cyber incidents, and FNCB may experience harm to its reputation and liability exposure from security breaches.
FNCB’s business involves the storage and transmission of customers' proprietary information and security breaches could expose FNCB to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation and potential liability. While FNCB has not incurred a material cyber-attack or security breach to date, a number of other financial services and other companies have disclosed cyber-attacks and security breaches, some of which have involved intentional attacks. Attacks may be targeted at FNCB, its customers or both. Although FNCB devotes significant resources to maintain, regularly update and backup its systems and processes that are designed to protect the security of FNCB’s computer systems, software, networks and other technology assets and the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information belonging to FNCB or its customers, its security measures may not be effective against all potential cyber-attacks or security breaches. Despite FNCB’s efforts to ensure the integrity of its systems, it is possible that FNCB may not be able to anticipate, or implement effective preventive measures against, all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently or are not recognized until launched, and because cyber-attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources, including persons who are involved with organized crime or associated with external service providers or who may be linked to terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments. These risks may increase in the future as FNCB continues to increase FNCB’s internet-based product offerings and expand its internal usage of web-based products and applications. If an actual or perceived security breach occurs, customer perception of the effectiveness of FNCB’s security measures could be harmed and could result in the loss of customers.
A successful penetration or circumvention of the security of FNCB’s systems, including those of third party providers or other financial institutions, or the failure to meet regulatory requirements for security of its systems, could cause serious negative consequences, including significant disruption of FNCB’s operations, misappropriation of FNCB’s confidential information or that of FNCB’s customers, or damage to FNCB’s computers or systems or those of FNCB’s customers or counterparties, significant increases in compliance costs (such as repairing systems or adding new personnel or protection technologies), and could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws, financial loss to FNCB or to its customers, loss of confidence in its security measures, customer dissatisfaction, significant litigation and regulatory exposure, and harm to FNCB’s reputation, all of which could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
If FNCB’sFNCB’s information technology is unable to keep pace with growth or industry developments or if technological developments result in higher costs or less advantageous pricing, financial performance may suffer.
Effective and competitive delivery of FNCB’sFNCB’s products and services increasingly depends on information technology resources and processes, both those provided internally as well as those provided through third party vendors. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology can improve efficiency and help reduce costs. FNCB’s future success will depend, in part, upon its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services to enhance customer convenience, as well as to create efficiencies in its operations. There is increasing pressure to provide products and services at lower prices. This can reduce net interest income and non-interest income from fee-based products and services. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies could require FNCB to make substantial capital expenditures to modify or adapt existing products and services or develop new products and services. FNCB may not be successful in introducing new products and services in response to industry trends or developments in technology, or those new products may not achieve market acceptance. Many of FNCB’s competitors have greater resources to invest in technological improvements. Additionally, as technology in the financial services industry changes and evolves, keeping pace becomes increasingly complex and expensive. There can be no assurance that FNCB will be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services, which could reduce its ability to compete effectively. As a result, FNCB could lose business, be forced to price products and services on less advantageous terms to retain or attract customers, or be subject to cost increases.
FNCB relies on management and other key personnel and the loss of any of them may adversely affect its operations.
FNCB believes each member of the executive management team is important to its success and the unexpected loss of any of these persons could impair day-to-day operations as well as its strategic direction.
FNCB’sFNCB’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people in most activities engaged in by FNCB can be intense and it may not be able to hire people or retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of FNCB’s key personnel could have a material adverse impact on its business due to the loss of their skills, knowledge of its market, years of industry experience and to the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
FNCB is dependent on the use of data and modeling in both its management’s decision-making generally and in meeting regulatory expectations in particular.
The use of statistical and quantitative models and other quantitatively-based analyses is endemic to bank decision-making and regulatory compliance processes, and the employment of such analyses is becoming increasingly widespread in FNCB’s operations. Liquidity stress testing, interest rate sensitivity analysis, allowance for loan loss measurement, portfolio stress testing and the identification of possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations are examples of areas in which FNCB is dependent on models and the data that underlies them. FNCB anticipates that model-derived insights will be used more widely in FNCB’s decision-making in the future. While these quantitative techniques and approaches improve FNCB’s decision-making, they also create the possibility that faulty data or flawed quantitative approaches could yield adverse outcomes or regulatory scrutiny. Secondarily, because of the complexity inherent in these approaches, misunderstanding or misuse of their outputs could similarly result in suboptimal decision making, which could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
New lines of business, products, product enhancements or services may subject FNCB to additional risk.
From time to time, FNCB may implement new lines of business or offer new products and product enhancements as well as new services within FNCB’s existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts. In developing, implementing or marketing new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services, FNCB may invest significant time and resources. FNCB may underestimate the appropriate level of resources or expertise necessary to make new lines of business or products successful to realize their expected benefits. FNCB may not achieve the milestones set in initial timetables for the development and introduction of new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the ultimate implementation of a new line of business or offering of new products, product enhancements or services. Any new line of business, product, product enhancement or service could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of FNCB’s system of internal controls. FNCB may also decide to discontinue business or products, due to lack of customer acceptance or unprofitability. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or offerings of new products, product enhancements or services could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
FNCB may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.
FNCB’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services companies are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services companies, or the financial services industry generally, could lead to market-wide liquidity problems and losses or defaults by FNCB or other institutions. These losses could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Damage to FNCB’s reputation could significantly harm its businesses, competitive position and prospects for growth.
FNCB’s ability to attract and retain investors, customers, clients, and employees could be adversely affected by damage to its reputation resulting from various sources, including environmental, social and governance ("ESG") related issues, employee misconduct, litigation, or regulatory outcomes; failure to deliver minimum standards of service and quality; compliance failures; unethical behavior; unintended breach of confidential information; and the activities of FNCB’s clients, customers, or counterparties. Actions by the financial services industry in general, or by certain entities or individuals within it, also could have a significantly adverse impact on FNCB’s reputation.
FNCB’s actual or perceived failure to identify and address various issues, including failure to properly address operational and ESG risks, could also give rise to reputation risk that could negatively impact business prospects. These issues include, among others, legal and regulatory requirements; consumer protection, fair lending, and privacy issues; properly maintaining customer and associated personal information; record keeping; protecting against money laundering; sales and trading practices; and ethical issues.
FNCB may be a defendant from time to time in a variety of litigation and other actions, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
FNCB has been and may continue to be involved from time to time in a variety of litigation matters arising out of its business. An increased number of lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits and other consumer driven litigation, have been filed and will likely continue to be filed against financial institutions, which may involve substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages. Management believes the risk of litigation generally increases during downturns in the national and local economies. FNCB’sFNCB’s insurance may not cover all claims that may be asserted against it, and any claims asserted against it, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm its reputation and may cause it to incur significant expense. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements in any litigation exceed insurance coverage, they could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, FNCB may not be able to obtain appropriate types or levels of insurance in the future, nor may it be able to obtain adequate replacement policies with acceptable terms, if at all. For additional discussion of FNCB’s current legal matters, referRefer to Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” ofto this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for an additional discussion of FNCB's current legal matters.
FNCB’s disclosure controls depends on the accuracy and procedurescompleteness of information about customers and internal controls overcounterparties.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with customers and counterparties, FNCB may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial information. FNCB may also rely on representations of customers and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. In deciding whether to extend credit, FNCB may rely upon customers' representations that their financial statements conform to GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. FNCB also may rely on customer representations and certifications, or audit or accountants' reports, with respect to the business and financial condition of its customers. FNCB’s financial condition, results of operations, financial reporting and reputation could be negatively affected if FNCB relies on materially misleading, false, inaccurate or fraudulent information.
FNCB may not achieve their intended objectives.face risks with respect to future expansion or acquisition activity.
FNCB maintains disclosure controlsmay selectively seek to expand its banking operations through limited de novo branching or opportunistic acquisition activities. FNCB cannot be certain that any expansion activity, through de novo branching, acquisition of branches of another financial institution or a whole institution, or the establishment or acquisition of nonbanking financial service companies, will prove profitable or will increase shareholder value. The success of any acquisition will depend, in part, on FNCB’s ability to realize the estimated cost savings and procedures designedrevenue enhancements from combining its business and that of the target company. FNCB’s ability to ensurerealize increases in revenue will depend, in part, on its ability to retain customers and employees, and to capitalize on existing relationships for the timely filingprovision of reports as specifiedadditional products and services. If FNCB estimates turn out to be incorrect or FNCB is not able to successfully combine companies, the anticipated cost savings and increased revenues may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. It is possible that the integration process could result in the rulesloss of key employees, the disruption of each company’s ongoing business, diversion of management attention, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and formspolicies that adversely affect FNCB’s ability to maintain relationships with clients and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Securities and Exchange Commission.merger. As with any combination of banking institutions, there also may be disruptions that cause FNCB also maintains a system of internal control over financial reporting. These controlsto lose customers or cause customers to withdraw their deposits. Customers may not achievereadily accept changes to their intended objectives. Control processesbanking arrangements that involve human diligenceFNCB makes as part of, or following, an acquisition. Additionally, the value of an acquisition to FNCB is dependent on its ability to successfully identify and compliance, suchestimate the magnitude of any asset quality issues of acquired companies.
FNCB may not be successful in overcoming these risks or other problems encountered in connection with potential acquisitions or other expansion activity. FNCB’s inability to overcome these risks could have an adverse effect on FNCB’s ability to implement its business strategy and enhance shareholder value, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, if FNCB records goodwill in connection with any acquisition, FNCB’s financial condition and results of operation may be adversely affected if that goodwill is determined to be impaired, which would require FNCB to take an impairment charge.
FNCB could be subject to environmental risks and associated costs on its foreclosed real estate assets.
A substantial portion of FNCB’s loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, FNCB may foreclose on and take title to properties securing loans. There is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties and that FNCB could be liable for remediation costs, as well as personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require FNCB to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected property's value or limit FNCB’s ability to sell the affected property. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic, and the measures taken to control its disclosure controlsspread, will continue to adversely impact our employees, customers, business operations and proceduresfinancial results, and internal controls over financial reporting,the ultimate impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted and is likely to continue to impact the national economy and the regional and local markets in which we operate, lower equity market valuations, create significant volatility and disruption in capital and debt markets, and increase unemployment levels. Our business operations may be disrupted if significant portions of our workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, or other restrictions in connection with the pandemic. We are subject to lapsesheightened cybersecurity, information security and operational risks as a result of work-from-home arrangements that we have put in judgmentplace for our employees. Federal Reserve actions to combat the economic contraction caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, including reductions of the target federal funds rate, could, if prolonged, adversely affect our net interest income and breakdownsmargins, and our profitability. Closures of businesses and the institution of social distancing, shelter in place and stay home orders in the communities we serve, have reduced business activity and financial transactions. While certain of these restrictions have been eased and workplaces in the communities we serve are beginning to reopen, the pace of reopening is measured, and these government policies and directives are subject to change as the effects and spread of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to evolve. It is unclear whether any COVID-19 pandemic-related business losses that we or our customers may suffer will be recovered by existing insurance policies. Changes in customer behavior due to worsening business and economic conditions or legislative or regulatory initiatives may impact the demand for our products and services, which could adversely affect our revenue, increase the recognition of credit losses in our loan portfolios and increase our allowance for credit losses. The measures we have taken to aid our customers, including short-term loan payment deferments and other payment accommodations under Section 4013 of the CARES Act, may be insufficient to help our customers who have been negatively impacted by the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. Loans that are currently in deferral status may become nonperforming loans. Because of adverse economic and market conditions affecting issuers, we may be required to recognize impairments on the securities we hold as well as reductions in other comprehensive income. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition, as well as our regulatory capital and liquidity ratios, will depend on future developments, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response to the pandemic, as well as further actions we may take as may be required by government authorities or that we determine is in the best interests of our employees and customers. There is no certainty that such measures will be sufficient to mitigate the risks posed by the pandemic.
Our participation in the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) may expose us to certain additional risks, including risks relating to alleged noncompliance with PPP rules and regulations, which could have a material adverse impact on FNCB's business, financial condition and results of operations.
The CARES Act, enacted on March 27, 2020, included a $349 billion loan program, the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") administered through the Small Business Administration ("SBA"). Additional funding was provided for the PPP in April 2020. Under the PPP, small businesses and other entities and individuals were permitted to apply for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved lenders. FNCB is a participating lender under the PPP, and, as of December 31, 2020, had processed and received SBA approval for 1,002 loan applications resulting in approximately $118.6 million in loans. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 that was enacted on December 27, 2020 provides an additional $284.6 billion in PPP funding to small businesses, including borrowers who previously received a PPP loan. On January 19, 2021, FNCB began originating PPP loans as part of this second round of funding and as of February 28, 2021, has processed and received SBA approval for 400 loans representing approximately $52.7 million in funding. It is FNCB's understanding that loans funded through the PPP are fully guaranteed by the United States government. However, there is some ambiguity in the laws, rules, and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP, which may expose us to compliance risks relating to the PPP. We may have credit risk on PPP loans if a determination is later made by the SBA that deficiency exists in the manner in which a particular loan was originated, funded, or serviced, such as an issue with the eligibility of a borrower to receive a PPP loan. In the event of a loss resulting from human failures. Controls can also be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there are risks that material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected and that information may not be reporteda default on a timely basis.PPP loan and a determination by the SBA that there was a deficiency in the manner in which the PPP loan was originated, funded, or serviced, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty relating to the loan, reduce the amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency.
Risks Related to FNCB’s Industry
Federal and state regulators periodically examine FNCB’s business and may require FNCB to remediate adverse examination findings or may take enforcement action against FNCB.
The FRB, the FDIC and the PADOBS, periodically examine FNCB’s business, including its compliance with laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, the Federal Reserve, FDIC or PADOBS were to determine that FNCB’s financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of any of FNCB’s operations had become unsatisfactory, or that FNCB’s controls are not effective, were in violation of any law or regulation, they may take a number of different remedial actions as they deem appropriate. These actions include the power to require FNCB to remediate any such adverse examination findings.
In addition, these agencies have the power to take enforcement action against FNCB to enjoin "unsafe or unsound" practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation of law or regulation or unsafe or unsound practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in FNCB’s capital, to direct the sale of subsidiaries or other assets, to limit dividends and distributions, including the repurchase of common stock, to restrict FNCB’s growth, to assess civil money penalties against FNCB or its officers or directors, to remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate FNCB’s deposit insurance and place the Bank into receivership or conservatorship. Any regulatory enforcement action against FNCB could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations,operations.
FNCB may be required to act as a source of financial and marketmanagerial strength for the Bank in times of stress.
FNCB, as a bank holding company, is required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to the Bank and to commit resources to support the Bank if necessary. FNCB may be required to commit additional resources to the Bank at times when FNCB may not be in a financial position to provide such resources or when it may not be in FNCB’s, or its common stock,shareholders’ or creditors’, best interests to do so. A requirement to provide such support is more likely during times of financial stress for FNCB and couldthe Bank, which may make any capital FNCB is required to raise to provide such support more expensive than it might otherwise be. In addition, any capital loans FNCB makes to the Bank are subordinate in right of repayment to deposit liabilities of the Bank.
FNCB is subject to extensive government regulation, supervision and possible regulatory enforcement actions, which may subject it to additionalhigher costs and lower shareholder returns.
The banking industry is subject to extensive regulation and supervision that govern almost all aspects of its operations. The extensive regulatory framework is primarily intended to protect the federal deposit insurance fund and depositors, not shareholders. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations can be difficult and costly and, in some instances, may put banks at a competitive disadvantage compared to less regulated competitors such as finance companies, mortgage banking companies, leasing companies and internet-based Fintech companies. FNCB’s regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including with respect to the imposition of restrictions on the operation of a bank or a bank holding company, the imposition of significant fines, the ability to delay or deny merger or other regulatory applications, the classification of assets by a bank, and the adequacy of a bank’s allowance for loan losses, among other matters. If they deem FNCB to be operating in a manner inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices, these regulatory authorities can require the entry into informal and formal supervisory agreements, including board resolutions, memorandum of understanding, settlement agreements and consent or cease and desist orders, pursuant to which FNCB would be required to implement identified corrective actions to address cited concerns and/or to refrain from taking certain actions in the form of injunctive relief. In recent years, the banking industry has faced increased regulation and scrutiny; for instance, areas such as BSA compliance (including BSA and related anti-money laundering regulations) and real estate-secured consumer lending (such as Truth-in-Lending regulations, changes in Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act regulations, implementation of licensing and registration requirements for mortgage originators and more recently, heightened regulatory attention to mortgage and foreclosure-related activities and exposures) are being confronted with escalating regulatory expectations and scrutiny. Non-compliance with laws and regulations such as these, even in cases of inadvertent non-compliance, could result in litigation, significant fines and/or sanctions. Any failure to comply with, or any change in, any applicable regulation and supervisory requirement, or change in regulation or enforcement by such authorities, whether in the form of policies, regulations, legislation, rules, orders, enforcement actions, or decisions, could have a material impact on FNCB, the Bank and other affiliates, and its operations. Federal economic and monetary policy may also affect FNCB’s ability to attract deposits and other funding sources, make loans and investments, and achieve satisfactory interest spreads. Any failure to comply with such regulation or supervision could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, compliance with any such action could distract management’s attention from FNCB’s operations, cause it to incur significant expenses, restrict it from engaging in potentially profitable activities and limit its ability to raise capital.
The price of FNCB’s common stockmay fluctuate significantly, which may make it difficult for investors to resell common stockat a time or price they find attractive.
FNCB’s common stock per share price may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond its control. These factors include, in addition to those described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2017, the per share closing bid price of FNCB’s common stock on the OTCQX Marketplace (“OTCQX”) ranged from a low of $6.05 on January 5, 2017, to a high of $8.13 on May 24, 2017.
In addition, in recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies, including for reasons unrelated to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect FNCB’s share price, notwithstanding its operating results. Management expects that the market price of its common stock will continue to fluctuate and there can be no assurances about the levels of the market prices for its common stock.
An active public market for FNCB’s common stock does not currently exist. As a result, shareholders may not be able to quickly and easily sell their shares of common stock.
Until March 5, 2018, FNCB’s shares of common stock were quoted on the OTCQX. An average of 5,669 shares of FNCB’s common stock traded on the OTCQX during 2017 on a daily basis. On March 5, 2018, FNCB’s shares of common stock began trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market®. An active, liquid market for FNCB’s shares of common stock has not previously existed, and there can be no assurance that an active and liquid market will develop, or if one does develop, if it can be maintained. The absence of an active trading market may make it difficult for FNCB shareholders to sell FNCB’s shares of common stock at the prevailing price when desired or at all, particularly in large quantities. For a further discussion, see Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
New or changed legislation or regulation and regulatory initiatives could adversely affect FNCB through increased regulation and increased costs of doing business.
Changes in federal and state legislation and regulation may affect FNCB’sFNCB’s operations. NewLaws and modified regulations, such as the Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III, may have unforeseen or unintended consequences on the banking industry. The Dodd-Frank Act has implemented significant changes to the U.S. financial system, including the creation of new regulatory agencies (such as the Financial Stability Oversight Council to oversee systemic risk and the CFPB to develop and enforce rules for consumer financial products), changes in retail banking regulations, and changes to deposit insurance assessments. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act has implemented new requirements with respect to “qualified mortgages” and new mortgage servicing standards have, and may continue to, increase costs associated with this business. For a more detailed description, seeRefer to the section entitled “Business – The Bank – Consumer Financial Protection Bureau” included in Item 1, "Business" to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for a more detailed description of new or changed legislation or regulation and regulatory initiatives.
Additionally, final rules to implement Basel III adopted in July 2013 revise risk-based and leverage capital requirements and limit capital distributions and certain discretionary bonuses if a banking organization does not hold the required “capital conservation buffer.” The rule became effective for FNCB on January 1, 2015, with some additional transition periods. This additional regulation could increase compliance costs and otherwise adversely affect operations. For a more detailed description of the final rules, seeRefer to the description in Item 1, of"Business" to this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Capital Adequacy Requirements”. for a more detailed description of the final rules. The potential also exists for additional federal or state laws or regulations, or changes in policy or interpretations, affecting many of FNCB’s operations, including capital levels, lending and funding practices, insurance assessments, and liquidity standards. The effect of any such changes and their interpretation and application by regulatory authorities cannot be predicted, may increase FNCB’s cost of doing business and otherwise affect FNCB’s operations, may significantly affect the markets in which it does business, and could have a materially adverse effect on FNCB.
FNCB is also subject to the guidelines under the GLB Act. The GLB Act guidelines require, among other things, that each financial institution develop, implement and maintain a written, comprehensive information security program containing safeguards that are appropriate to the financial institution’sinstitution’s size and complexity, the nature and scope of the financial institution’s activities and the sensitivity of any customer information at issue. In recent years there also has been increasing enforcement activity in the areas of privacy, information security and data protection in the United States, including at the federal level. Compliance with these laws, rules and regulations regarding the privacy, security and protection of customer and employee data could result in higher compliance and technology costs. In addition, non-compliance could result in potentially significant fines, penalties and damage to FNCB’s reputation and brand.
ChangesThe Federal Reserve may also set higher capital requirements for holding companies whose circumstances warrant it. For example, holding companies experiencing significant internal growth or making acquisitions are expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets. FNCB’s regulatory capital ratios currently are in accounting standardsexcess of the levels established for "well capitalized" institutions. Future regulatory change could impact reported earnings.impose higher capital standards.
From time to time there are changesAny new or revised standards adopted in the financial accountingfuture may require us to maintain materially more capital, with common equity as a more predominant component, or manage the configuration of our assets and reporting standards that govern the preparation of financial statements. These changes can materially impact how FNCB records and reports itsliabilities to comply with formulaic liquidity requirements. We may not be able to raise additional capital at all, or on terms acceptable to us. Failure to maintain capital to meet current or future regulatory requirements could have a significant material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In some instances,
FNCB faces a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations.
The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, or the USA Patriot Act or Patriot Act, and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, among other duties, to institute and maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and to file reports such as suspicious activity reports and currency transaction reports. FNCB is required to comply with these and other anti-money laundering requirements. FNCB’s federal and state banking regulators, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), and other government agencies are authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of anti-money laundering requirements. FNCB is also subject to increased scrutiny of compliance with the regulations issued and enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). If FNCB’s program is deemed deficient, FNCB could be requiredsubject to applyliability, including fines, civil money penalties and other regulatory actions, which may include restrictions on FNCB’s business operations and its ability to pay dividends, or repurchase shares of its common stock, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion, and restrictions on entering new business lines. Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have significant consequences to FNCB's reputation. Any of these circumstances could have a newmaterial adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatementresults of prior period financial statements.operations.
Compliance Risk
FNCB is subject to extensive government regulation, supervisionnumerous "fair and possible regulatory enforcement actions, which may subject itresponsible banking" laws designed to higher costsprotect consumers, and lower shareholder returns.failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions.
The Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations, including state laws and regulations, prohibit discriminatory lending practices by financial institutions. The Federal Trade Commission Act and the Dodd-Frank Act prohibit unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices by financial institutions. The U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, federal banking industryagencies, and other federal and state agencies are responsible for enforcing these fair and responsible banking laws and regulations. A challenge to an institution’s compliance with fair and responsible banking laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity, restrictions on expansion and restrictions on entering new business lines. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
FNCB is subject to extensive regulationlaws regarding the privacy, information security and supervisionprotection of personal information and any violation of these laws or another incident involving personal, confidential or proprietary information of individuals could damage FNCB’s reputation and otherwise adversely affect FNCB’s business.
FNCB’s business requires the collection and retention of large volumes of customer data, including personally identifiable information (“PII”), in various information systems that govern almost all aspectsFNCB maintains and in those maintained by third party service providers. FNCB also maintains important internal company data such as PII about its employees and information relating to its operations. FNCB is subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations governing the privacy and protection of PII of individuals (including customers, employees and other third parties). For example, FNCB’s business is subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, or the GLB Act, which, among other things: (i) imposes certain limitations on FNCB’s ability to share nonpublic PII about FNCB’s customers with nonaffiliated third parties; (ii) requires that FNCB provides certain disclosures to customers about its information collection, sharing and security practices and afford customers the right to "opt out" of any information sharing by FNCB with nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions); and (iii) requires that FNCB develops, implements and maintains a written comprehensive information security program containing appropriate safeguards based on FNCB’s size and complexity, the nature and scope of its operations. The extensiveactivities, and the sensitivity of customer information FNCB processes, as well as plans for responding to data security breaches. Various federal and state banking regulators and states have also enacted data breach notification requirements with varying levels of individual, consumer, regulatory framework is primarily intended to protector law enforcement notification in the federal deposit insurance fundevent of a security breach. Ensuring that FNCB’s collection, use, transfer and depositors, not shareholders. Compliancestorage of PII complies with all applicable laws and regulations can increase FNCB’s costs. Furthermore, FNCB may not be difficultable to ensure that customers and costlyother third parties have appropriate controls in place to protect the confidentiality of the information that they exchange with FNCB, particularly where such information is transmitted by electronic means. If personal, confidential or proprietary information of customers or others were to be mishandled or misused (in situations where, for example, such information was erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information, or where such information was intercepted or otherwise compromised by third parties), FNCB could be exposed to litigation or regulatory sanctions under privacy and in some instances, may put banks at a competitive disadvantage compareddata protection laws and regulations. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of FNCB’s measures to less regulated competitorssafeguard PII, or even the perception that such as finance companies, mortgage banking companies, leasing companies and internet-based Fintech companies. FNCB’s regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including with respect to the imposition of restrictions on the operation of a bank or a bank holding company, the imposition of significant fines, the ability to delay or deny merger or other regulatory applications, the classification of assets by a bank, and the adequacy of a bank’s allowance for loan losses, among other matters. If they deemmeasures are inadequate, could cause FNCB to be operating in a manner inconsistent with safelose customers or potential customers and sound banking practices, these regulatory authorities can require the entry into informal and formal supervisory agreements, including board resolutions, memoranda of understanding, settlement agreements and consentthereby reduce FNCB’s revenues. Accordingly, any failure, or cease and desist orders, pursuant to which FNCB would be required to implement identified corrective actions to address cited concerns and/or to refrain from taking certain actions in the form of injunctive relief. In recent years, the banking industry has faced increased regulation and scrutiny; for instance, areas such as BSA compliance (including BSA and related anti-money laundering regulations) and real estate-secured consumer lending (such as Truth-in-Lending regulations, changes in Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act regulations, implementation of licensing and registration requirements for mortgage originators and more recently, heightened regulatory attention to mortgage and foreclosure-related activities and exposures) are being confronted with escalating regulatory expectations and scrutiny. Non-compliance with laws and regulations such as these, even in cases of inadvertent non-compliance, could result in litigation, significant fines and/or sanctions. Anyperceived failure, to comply with applicable privacy or any change in, any applicable regulationdata protection laws and supervisory requirement, or change in regulation or enforcement by such authorities, whether in the form of policies, regulations legislation, rules, orders, enforcement actions, or decisions, could have a material impact onmay subject FNCB the Bankto inquiries, examinations and other affiliates, and its operations. Federal economic and monetary policy may also affect FNCB’s ability to attract deposits and other funding sources, make loans and investments, and achieve satisfactory interest spreads. Any failure to comply with such regulation or supervisioninvestigations that could result in sanctionsrequirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices or in significant liabilities, fines or penalties, and could damage FNCB’s reputation and otherwise adversely affect FNCB’s operations, financial condition and results of operations.
Rulemaking changes implemented by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau may result in higher regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/and compliance costs that may adversely affect FNCB’s business.
The Dodd-Frank Act created a new, independent federal agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or reputation damage,CFPB, which was granted broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws. The consumer protection provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the examination, supervision and enforcement of those laws and implementing regulations issued by the CFPB have created a more intense and complex environment for consumer finance regulation. The ultimate impact of this heightened scrutiny is uncertain but could result in changes to pricing, practices, products and procedures. It could also result in increased costs related to regulatory oversight, supervision and examination. These changes could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank’s FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments may increase.
The Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC up to legal limits and, accordingly, the Bank is subject to insurance assessments based on the Bank’s average consolidated total assets less its average tangible equity. The Bank’s regular assessments are determined by its risk classification, which is based on its regulatory capital levels and the level of supervisory concern that it poses. Numerous bank failures during the financial crisis and increases in the statutory deposit insurance limits increased resolution costs to the FDIC and put significant pressure on the Deposit Insurance Fund. In order to maintain a strong funding position and the reserve ratios of the Deposit Insurance Fund required by statute and FDIC estimates of projected requirements, the FDIC has the power to increase deposit insurance assessment rates and impose special assessments on all FDIC-insured financial institutions. Any future increases or special assessments could reduce FNCB’s profitability and could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to FNCB’s Common Stock
The price of FNCB’s common stock may fluctuate significantly, which may make it difficult for shareholders to resell shares of common stock at a time or price they find attractive.
FNCB’s stock price may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond its control. These factors include, among others:
● | actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in operating results and financial condition; |
● | changes in financial estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or actions taken by rating agencies with respect to FNCB or other financial institutions; |
● | speculation in the press or investment community generally or relating to FNCB’s reputation or the financial services industry; |
● | failure to declare dividends on FNCB’s common stock from time to time; |
● | failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates; |
● | failure to integrate any future acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from any future acquisitions; |
● | strategic actions by FNCB or its competitors, such as acquisitions, restructurings, dispositions or financings; |
● | fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of FNCB’s competitors or other companies that investors deem comparable to FNCB; |
● | future sales or repurchases of FNCB’s equity or equity-related securities; |
● | proposed or adopted regulatory changes or developments; |
● | anticipated or pending audits or litigation that involve or affect FNCB; |
● | any future investigations or proceedings that involve or affect FNCB; |
● | adverse weather conditions, including floods, tornadoes and hurricanes; |
● | geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts; |
● | domestic and international economic factors unrelated to FNCB’s performance; and |
● | general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial services industry. |
In addition, compliancein recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies, including for reasons unrelated to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect FNCB’s stock price, notwithstanding its operating results. FNCB expects that the market price of its common stock will continue to fluctuate and there can be no assurances about the levels of the market prices for its common stock.
General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause FNCB’s stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.
The rights of holders of FNCB’s common stock to receive liquidation payments and dividend payments are junior to FNCB’s existing and future indebtedness and to any senior securities FNCB may issue in the future, and FNCB’s ability to declare dividends on, or repurchase shares of, the common stock may become limited.
Shares of the common stock are equity interests in FNCB and do not constitute indebtedness. As such, shares of FNCB’s common stock rank junior to all current and future indebtedness and other non-equity claims on FNCB with respect to assets available to satisfy claims on FNCB, including in a liquidation of FNCB. FNCB may, and the Bank and FNCB’s other subsidiaries may also, incur additional indebtedness from time to time and may increase FNCB’s aggregate level of outstanding indebtedness.
FNCB’s board of directors is authorized to cause FNCB to issue additional classes or series of preferred stock without any such action on the part of the shareholders. If FNCB issues preferred shares in the future that have a preference over its common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, or if FNCB issues preferred shares with voting rights that dilute the voting power of the common stock, then the rights of holders of FNCB’s common stock or the market price of FNCB’s common stock could distract management’s attention from be adversely affected.
FNCB’s operations, causeability to pay dividend, or repurchase shares of its common stock, may become limited by regulatory restrictions. In addition, the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to FNCB is limited by the Bank’s obligations to maintain sufficient accumulated net earnings and by other general restrictions on dividends that are applicable to state nonmember banks.
Holders of FNCB’s common stock are only entitled to receive the dividends that FNCB’s board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for those payments. In addition, FNCB's board of directors may only repurchase shares out of funds legally available for those repurchases. Although FNCB has historically paid cash dividends on its common stock, and has recently announced a share repurchase program to repurchase shares of its common stock, FNCB is not required to do so. FNCB cannot assure shareholders that it to incur significant expenses, restrict it from engagingwill continue paying dividends, or repurchase shares, in potentially profitable activitiesthe future. This could adversely affect the market price of FNCB’s common stock. Also, as discussed above, FNCB is a bank holding company and limit its ability to raise capital.
Strategic Riskdeclare and pay dividends, or repurchase shares, depends in part on federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends.
FNCB may need to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed and on terms favorable to current shareholders.
Laws, regulations and banking regulators require FNCB and the Bank to maintain adequate levels of capital to support their operations. In addition, capital levels are determined by FNCB’sFNCB’s management and Board of Directors based on capital levels that they believe are necessary to support business operations. Management regularly evaluates its present and future capital requirements and needs and analyzes capital raising alternatives and options. Although FNCB succeeded in meeting its current regulatory capital requirements, it may need to raise additional capital in the future to support growth, possible loan losses or potential OTTI during future periods, to meet future regulatory capital requirements or for other reasons.
The Board of Directors may determine from time to time that FNCB needs to raise additional capital by issuing additional shares of common stock or other securities. FNCB is not restricted from issuing additional shares of common stock, including securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock. Because FNCB’s decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond its control, FNCB cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of any future offerings, or the prices at which such offerings may be affected. Such offerings will likely be dilutive to common shareholders from ownership, earnings and book value perspectives. New investors also may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to, and that adversely affect, its then current common shareholders. Additionally, if FNCB raises additional capital by making additional offerings of debt or preferred equity securities, upon liquidation, holders of its debt securities and shares of preferred shares, and lenders with respect to other borrowings, will receive distributions of available assets prior to the holders of common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of existing shareholders or reduce the market price of FNCB’s common stock, or both. Holders of FNCB’s common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution.
FNCB cannot provide any assurance that additional capital will be available on acceptable terms or at all. Any occurrence that may limit access to the capital markets may adversely affect FNCB’sFNCB’s capital costs and its ability to raise capital and, in turn, its liquidity. Moreover, if FNCB needs to raise capital, it may have to do so when many other financial institutions are also seeking to raise capital and would have to compete with those institutions for investors. An inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed could have a material adverse effect on FNCB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Reputation Risk
DamageAn investment in FNCB’s common stock is not an insured deposit.
FNCB’s common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in FNCB’s common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section, and elsewhere in FNCB’s reports filed with the SEC, including under heading “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or any subsequent report filed by FNCB. Investment in FNCB’s common stock is also subject to the market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, shareholders may lose some or all of their investment in FNCB’s common stock.
Shareholders may not receive dividends on FNCB’s common stock.
Although FNCB’s reputation has historically declared quarterly cash dividends on its common stock, and recently announced a share repurchase program for the repurchase of shares of its common stock, FNCB is not required to do so and may reduce or cease to pay common stock dividends, or repurchase shares, in the future. If FNCB reduces or ceases to pay common stock dividends, or terminates its stock repurchase program, the market price of its common stock could significantly harmbe adversely affected.
The principal source of funds from which FNCB pays cash dividends, and repurchase shares, are the dividends received from the Bank. Banking laws and regulations of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania restrict the amount of dividends and loans a bank may make to its businesses, competitive positionparent company. In addition, under The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, banks may not pay a dividend, or repurchase shares if, after paying the dividend, or repurchasing such shares, the bank would be undercapitalized.
If FNCB fails to pay dividends, capital appreciation, if any, of its common stock may be the sole opportunity for gains on an investment in its common stock. In addition, in the event the Bank becomes unable to pay dividends to FNCB, FNCB may not be able to service its debt or pay its other obligations, pay dividends on, or repurchase shares of, its common stock and prospectspreferred stock. Accordingly, FNCB’s inability to receive dividends from the Bank could also have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations and the value of a shareholder’s investment in FNCB’s common stock.
An entity holding as little as a 5% interest in FNCB’s outstanding securities could, under certain circumstances, be subject to regulation as a “bank holding company.”
Any entity, including a “group” composed of natural persons, owning or controlling with the power to vote 25% or more of FNCB’s outstanding securities, or 5% or more if the holder otherwise exercises a “controlling influence” over FNCB, may be subject to regulation as a “bank holding company” in accordance with the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, or the BHC Act. In addition, (a) any bank holding company or foreign bank with a U.S. presence may be required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve under the BHC Act to acquire or retain 5% or more of FNCB’s outstanding securities and (b) any person not otherwise defined as a company by the BHC Act and its implementing regulations may be required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve under the Change in Bank Control Act to acquire or retain 10% or more of FNCB’s outstanding securities. Becoming a bank holding company imposes statutory and regulatory restrictions and obligations, such as providing managerial and financial strength for growth.its bank subsidiaries. Regulation as a bank holding company could require the holder to divest all or a portion of the holder’s investment in FNCB’s securities or those nonbanking investments that may be deemed impermissible or incompatible with bank holding company status, such as a material investment in a company unrelated to banking.
The requirements of being a public company may strain FNCB’s resources and divert management's attention.
FNCB’s is a public company, subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and applicable securities rules and regulations. Under FDIC regulations, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and regulations increase the scope, complexity and cost of corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices over those of non-public or non-reporting companies. Among other things, the Exchange Act requires that FNCB file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to its business and operating results and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. As a Nasdaq listed company, FNCB is also required to prepare and file proxy materials which meet the requirements of the Exchange Act and the SEC's proxy rules. Compliance with these rules and regulations increase FNCB’s legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly, and increase demand on FNCB’s systems and resources, particularly if FNCB becomes ineligible to report as a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the SEC’s regulations. In order to maintain, appropriately document and, if required, improve FNCB’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet the standards required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management's attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could harm FNCB’s business and operating results. Additionally, any failure by FNCB to file its periodic reports with the SEC in a timely manner could, among other things, harm its reputation, cause its investors and potential investors to lose confidence in FNCB, restrict trading in or reduce the market price of FNCB’s common stock, and potentially limit its ability to access the capital markets.
As a public company, FNCB incurs significant legal, accounting, insurance, compliance and other expenses. Any deficiencies in FNCB’s financial reporting or internal controls could materially and adversely affect its business and the market price of FNCB’s common stock.
As a public company, FNCB incurs significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses. These costs and compliance with the rules of the SEC and the rules of Nasdaq increase FNCB’s legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time consuming and costly. SEC rules require that FNCB’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer periodically certify the existence and effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. In addition, FNCB is required to engage an independent registered public accounting firm to audit and opine on the design and operating effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. This process requires significant documentation of policies, procedures and systems, and review of that documentation and testing of FNCB’s internal control over financial reporting by its internal auditing and accounting staff and an independent registered public accounting firm. This process requires considerable time and attention from management, which could prevent FNCB from successfully implementing its business initiatives and improving its business, financial condition and results of operations, which may strain FNCB’s internal resources, and may increase its operating costs. FNCB may experience higher than anticipated operating expenses and outside auditor fees during the implementation of these changes and thereafter.
During the course of FNCB’s testing it may identify deficiencies that would have to be remediated to satisfy the SEC rules for certification of FNCB’s internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is defined by the standards issued by the PCAOB as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that results in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of FNCB’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a consequence, FNCB would have to disclose in periodic reports it files with the SEC any material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting. The existence of a material weakness would preclude management from concluding that FNCB’s internal control over financial reporting is effective and would preclude its independent auditors from expressing an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. In addition, disclosures of deficiencies of this type in FNCB’s SEC reports could cause investors to lose confidence in its financial reporting, and may negatively affect the market price of its common stock, and could result in the delisting of its securities from the securities exchanges on which they trade. Moreover, effective internal controls are necessary to produce reliable financial reports and to prevent fraud. If FNCB has deficiencies in its disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting, it may materially and adversely affect FNCB.
FNCB’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting may not achieve their intended objectives.
FNCB maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure the timely filing of reports as specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. FNCB also maintains a system of internal control over financial reporting. These controls may not achieve their intended objectives. Control processes that involve human diligence and compliance, such as its disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, are subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Controls can also be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there are risks that material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected and that information may not be reported on a timely basis. If FNCB’s controls are not effective, it could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, and market for its common stock, and could subject it to additional regulatory scrutiny.
Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.
From time to time there are changes in the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of financial statements. These changes can materially impact how FNCB records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some instances, FNCB could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.
Changes which have been approved for future implementation, or which are currently proposed or expected to be proposed or adopted include requirements that we: (i) calculate the allowance for loan losses on the basis of the current expected credit losses over the lifetime of our loans, referred to as the CECL model, which is expected to be applicable to us beginning in 2023; and (ii) record the value of and liabilities relating to operating leases on our balance sheet, which was implemented in the beginning of 2019. These changes could adversely affect our capital, regulatory capital ratios, ability to make larger loans, earnings and performance metrics. Any such changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Under the CECL model, banks will be required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is to be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the "incurred loss" model required under current GAAP, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, we expect that the adoption of the CECL model will materially affect how we determine our allowance for loan losses, and could require us to significantly increase our allowance. Moreover, the CECL model may create more volatility in the level of the allowance for loan losses. If we are required to materially increase the level of the allowance for loan losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are evaluating the impact the CECL accounting model will have on our accounting, but expect to recognize a one-time cumulative-effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective. We cannot yet determine the magnitude of any such one-time cumulative adjustment or of the overall impact of the new standard on our financial condition or results of operations.
Anti-takeover provisions in FNCB’s charter documents could discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of FNCB’s company and diminish the value of FNCB’s common stock.
Some of the provisions of FNCB’s amended and restated articles of incorporation, as amended, and amended and restated bylaws, as amended, could make it difficult for its shareholders to change the composition of its board of directors, preventing them from changing the composition of management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that FNCB’s shareholders may consider favorable. These provisions include:
● | classifying FNCB’s board of directors into three classes of directors with staggered three-year terms; |
● | authorizing FNCB’s board of directors to issue preferred shares without shareholder approval; |
● | prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors; |
● | requiring the approval of 75% of FNCB’s shareholders to approve any merger or sale of all, or substantially all, unless approval of such proposed transaction is recommended by at least a majority of FNCB’s entire board of directors; |
● | authorizing FNCB’s board of directors to, if it deems advisable, oppose a tender or other offer for FNCB’s securities; and |
● | requiring the approval of 75% of FNCB’s shareholders to amend certain provisions relating to business combinations not approved by the board of directors. |
In addition, pursuant to the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law (the “PBCL”), in the case of a merger or share exchange, with some exceptions, FNCB’s board of directors must submit the plan of merger or share exchange to the shareholders for approval, and the approval of the plan of merger or share exchange generally requires the approval of the shareholders at a meeting at which a quorum consisting of at least a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the plan exists.
Provisions of the PBCL, applicable to FNCB provide, among other things, that:
● | FNCB may not engage in a business combination with an “interested shareholder,” generally defined as a holder of 20% of a corporation’s voting stock, during the five-year period after the interested shareholder became such except under certain specified circumstances; |
● | holders of FNCB’s common stock may object to a “control transaction” involving FNCB (a control transaction is defined as the acquisition by a person or group of persons acting in concert of at least 20% of the outstanding voting stock of a corporation), and demand that they be paid a cash payment for the “fair value” of their shares from the “controlling person or group”; |
● | holders of “control shares” will not be entitled to voting rights with respect to any shares in excess of specified thresholds, including 20% voting control, until the voting rights associated with such shares are restored by the affirmative vote of a majority of disinterested shares and the outstanding voting shares of the Company; and |
● | any “profit,” as defined in the PBCL, realized by any person or group who is or was a “controlling person or group” with respect to FNCB from the disposition of any equity securities of within 18 months after the person or group became a “controlling person or group” shall belong to and be recoverable by FNCB. |
These anti-takeover provisions could impede the ability of FNCB’s common shareholders to benefit from a change of control and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on the market price of FNCB’s common stock and shareholders’ ability to realize any potential change-in-control premium.
Short sellers of FNCB’s stock may be manipulative and may drive down the market price of FNCB’s common stock.
Short selling is the practice of selling securities that the seller does not own but rather has borrowed or intends to borrow from a third party with the intention of buying identical securities at a later date to return to the lender. A short seller hopes to profit from a decline in the value of the securities between the sale of the borrowed securities and the purchase of the replacement shares, as the short seller expects to pay less in that purchase than it received in the sale. As it is in the short seller's interest for the price of the stock to decline, some short sellers publish, or arrange for the publication of, opinions or characterizations regarding the relevant issuer, its business practices and prospects and similar matters calculated to or which may create negative market momentum, which may permit them to obtain profits for themselves as a result of selling the stock short. Issuers whose securities have historically had limited trading volumes or have been susceptible to relatively high volatility levels can be particularly vulnerable to such short seller attacks. The publication of any such commentary regarding FNCB in the future may bring about a temporary, or possibly long-term, decline in the market price of FNCB’s common stock. No assurances can be made that declines in the market price of FNCB’s common stock will not occur in the future, in connection with such commentary by short sellers or otherwise. When the market price of a company's stock drops significantly, it is not unusual for stockholder lawsuits to be filed or threatened against the company and its board of directors and for a company to suffer reputational damage. Such lawsuits could cause FNCB to incur substantial costs and divert the time and attention of FNCB’s board and management. In addition, reputational damage may affect FNCB’s ability to attract and retain investors,deposits and may cause FNCB’s deposit costs to increase, which could adversely affect its liquidity and earnings. Reputational damage may also affect FNCB’s ability to attract and retain loan customers clients, and employeesmaintain and develop other business relationships, which could belikewise adversely affectedaffect FNCB’s earnings. Negative reports issued by damageshort sellers could also negatively impact FNCB’s ability to our reputation resulting from various sources, including employee misconduct, litigation, or regulatory outcomes; failure to deliver minimum standards of serviceattract and quality; compliance failures; unethical behavior; unintended breach of confidential information; and the activities of our clients, customers, and/or counterparties. Actions by the financial services industry in general, or by certain entities or individuals within it, also could have a significantly adverse impact on our reputation.retain employees.
FNCB’s actual or perceived failure to identify and address various issues, including failure to properly address operational risks, could also give rise to reputational risk that could negatively impact business prospects. These issues include legal and regulatory requirements; consumer protection, fair lending, and privacy issues; properly maintaining customer and associated personal information; record keeping; protecting against money laundering; sales and trading practices; and ethical issues.
Unresolved Staff Comments. |
None.
Properties. |
FNCB currently conducts business from its headquarters located at 102 E. Drinker Street, Dunmore, Pennsylvania, which now also houses the Bank’s Commercial Lending and Retail Banking Units. The Bank's main office is located at 102 East Drinker100 S. Blakely Street, Dunmore, Pennsylvania, 18512. At December 31, 2017,2020, FNCB also operated seventeensixteen additional branchescommunity banking offices located throughout Lackawanna, Luzerne and Wayne counties, an LPO located in Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania and a lending center and two administrative offices and another lending center located in Dunmore, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania. FourteenEight of the offices are leased and the balance are owned by the Bank. Except for potential remodeling of certain facilities to provide for the efficient use of work spaceworkspace and/or to maintain an appropriate appearance, each property is considered reasonably suitable and adequate for current and immediate future purposes.purposes except as discussed below.
As part of its responsibilities, management regularly evaluates FNCB’s delivery system and facilities including analyzing each office’s operating efficiency, location, foot traffic, structure and design. As a result of these evaluations, on May 1, 2017, FNCB announced thatand the Bank will implement ahave an ongoing comprehensivebranch network improvement program that will focus focuses on strengthening, better positioning and expanding its market coverage by developing new state-of-the-art customer facilities, as well as relocating and consolidating select locations. In accordance withInitiatives FNCB executed under the branch network improvement program on June 30, 2017, FNCB consolidated its branch office located at 1127 Texas Palmyra Highway, Honesdale, Wayne County, Pennsylvania with its branch located at 1001 Main Street, Honesdale, Pennsylvania.
As part of this network improvement program, FNCB announced its intention to relocate three branches located in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania to a new location. The three branches that will be relocated are: 1) a branch located at 734 San Souci Parkway, Hanover Township, Pennsylvania; 2) a branch located at 27 North River Street, Plains, Pennsylvania;during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 3) a branch located at 3 Old Boston Road, Pittston, Pennsylvania. These three branches will be relocated into a brand-new facility to be built in the Richland 315 development located at 1150 Route 315, Wilkes-Barre (Plains Township), Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. FNCB currently leases the three branches, as well as the aforementioned Honesdale branch, that was consolidated, and will lease the future Luzerne County facility. FNCB does not expect to incur any significant disposal costs on either the Wayne County or Luzerne County branch consolidations. The construction of the new facility began in the fourth quarter of 2017 and is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2018, at which time the Luzerne County branch consolidation will occur. The three existing branches will continue to operate as full-service branches until that time.
On December 21, 2016, the Bank purchased a building located immediately adjacent to its main office at 106-108 East Drinker Street, Dunmore, Pennsylvania, 18512 for the purpose of housing its commercial and retail lending units. The lending center opened on March 7, 2017.
On January 20, 2017, FNCB opened a LPO in Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania and began offering its retail and commercial lending products in this new market area. This LPO is located in an office leased by the Bank at 3500 Winchester Road, Suites 101 and 102, Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18104.
On September 27, 2017, the Board of Directors of FNCB approved the purchase of the Bank’s corporate center located at 200 South Blakely Street, Dunmore, Pennsylvania, for $2.15 million. FNCB had been leasing this property since 1994. The purchase, which was finalized on January 12, 2018, was funded by cash generated from operations and is anticipated to reduce occupancy expenses by approximately $100,000 annually.2019 include:
● | At the end of the second quarter of 2019, FNCB completed the construction and re-location of its former main office located at 102 E. Drinker Street, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania, into a new state-of-the-art office that was constructed directly across the street at 100 S. Blakely Street, Dunmore, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania. The property is owned by the Bank and housed a separate drive-thru location, as well as a drive-thru and a walk-up ATM. The project amounted to approximately $2.0 million in costs that were funded by cash generated through normaloperations. The relocation has created operating efficiencies, enhanced customer service and improved accessibility; |
● | In the second quarter of 2019, the Bank opened a new branch in Mountain Top, Pennsylvania. FNCB had purchased the real property, improvements and fixtures on December 14, 2018, which is located at 360 South Mountain Boulevard, Mountain Top, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania for $550 thousand. The deed contained a restriction under which FNCB had to agree not to operate, sell, or lease the property for a period of six months from the recording of the deed; and |
● | Previously, FNCB operated a limited purpose office (LPO). On November 30, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Bank approved a resolution to close the LPO located at 3500 Winchester Road, Allentown, Pennsylvania and the LPO was subsequently closed on January 18, 2021. The closure is consistent with the Bank's strategic goals and will not have any significant disruptions to the customer relationships serviced in that area. |
See Note 6, "Bank Premises and Equipment" of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information about FNCB's properties.
Legal |
On May 24, 2012, a putative shareholder filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas for Lackawanna County (“Shareholder Derivative Suit”) against certain present and former directors and officers of FNCB (the “Individual Defendants”) alleging, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, corporate waste, and unjust enrichment. FNCB was named as a nominal defendant. On February 4, 2014, the Court issued a Final Order and Judgment for the matter granting approval of a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Settlement”) and dismissing all claims against FNCB and the Individual Defendants. As part of the Settlement, without admitting any fault, wrongdoing or liability, the Individual Defendants agreed to settle the derivative litigation for $5.0 million. The $5.0 million Settlement payment was made to FNCB on March 28, 2014. The Individual Defendants reserved their rights to indemnification under FNCB’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, resolutions adopted by the Board, the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law and any and all rights they have against FNCB’s and the Bank’s insurance carriers. In addition, in conjunction with the Settlement, FNCB accrued $2.5 million related to fees and costs of the plaintiff’s attorneys, which was included in non-interest expense in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2013. On April 1, 2014, FNCB paid the $2.5 million related to fees and costs of the plaintiff’s attorneys and partial indemnification of the Individual Defendants in the amount of $2.5 million. On July 1, 2017, FNCB continued to make partial indemnification to the Individual Defendants by commencing monthly principal payments, on behalf of the Individual Defendants, of $25,000 plus accrued interest due to First Northern Bank and Trust Co. As of December 31, 2017, $2.5 million plus accrued interest remains accrued in other liabilities related to the potential indemnification of the Individual Defendants.
On September 5, 2012, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (“F&D”) filed an action against FNCB and the Bank, as well as several current and former officers and directors of FNCB, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. F&D has asserted a claim for the rescission of a directors’ and officers’ insurance policy and a bond that it had issued to FNCB. On November 9, 2012, FNCB and the Bank answered the claim and asserted counterclaims for the losses and expenses already incurred by FNCB and the Bank. FNCB and the other defendants are defending the claims and have opposed F&D’s requested relief by way of counterclaims, breaches of contract and bad faith claims against F&D for its failure to fulfill its obligations to FNCB and the Bank under the insurance policy. Discovery is complete and the parties have exchanged expert reports. Dispositive motions have been submitted by the parties and the Court heard oral arguments on the motions on August 9, 2017. FNCB is awaiting the Court’s rulings on the dispositive motions. At this time, FNCB cannot reasonably determine the outcome of potential range of loss, if any, in connection with this matter.
On February 16, 2017, FNCB and the Bank entered into a Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) in the matters filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County to Steven Antonik, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Linda Kluska, William R. Howells and Louise A. Howells, Summer Benjamin, and Joshua Silfee, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated vs. First National Community Bancorp, Inc. and First National Community Bank, Civil Action No. 2013-CV-4438 and Charles Saxe, III, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. First National Community Bank No. 2013-CV-5071 (collectively, the “Actions”). By entering into this Settlement Agreement, the parties to the Actions have resolved the claims made in the complaints to their mutual satisfaction. FNCB has not admitted to the validity of any claims or allegations and denies any liability in the claims made and the Plaintiffs have not admitted that any claims or allegations lack merit or foundation. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the parties have agreed to the following: 1) FNCB is to pay the Plaintiffs’ class members the aggregate sum of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000) (an amount which FNCB recorded as a liability and corresponding expense in its 2015 operating results); 2) Plaintiffs shall release all claims against FNCB related to the Actions; 3) FNCB shall move to vacate or satisfy any judgments against any class members arising from the vehicle loans that are the subject of the Actions; and 4) FNCB shall waive the deficiency balance of each class member and remove the trade lines on each class members’ credit report associated with the subject vehicle loans that are at issue in the Actions for Experian, Equifax, and Transunion. The Settlement Agreement provides for an Incentive Award for the representative Plaintiffs and an award to Plaintiffs’ counsel of attorney’s fees and reimbursement of expenses in connection with their roles in these Actions, subject to Court approval. The Settlement Agreement was preliminarily approved by Court Order on February 16, 2017. On March 2, 2017, FNCB paid the Settlement Administrator Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand ($750,000) pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement received final Court approval on May 31, 2017. Additionally, in association with the subject vehicle loans, FNCB has completed the removal of trade lines on each class members' credit report and has substantially completed satisfying judgments, where applicable, in favor of class members. As previously mentioned above and in connection with the primary terms of the tentative settlement agreement entered by Order of Court on December 17, 2015, FNCB recorded a liability and corresponding expense in the amount of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand ($750,000), which was included in FNCB’s 2015 operating results.
FNCB has been subject to tax audits, and is also a party to routine litigation involving various aspects of its business, such as employment practice claims, workers compensation claims, claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which FNCB holds security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to its business, none of which has or is expected to have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of FNCB.
Mine Safety Disclosures. |
Not Applicable.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
Market Prices of Stock and Dividends Paid
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, FNCB’s common shares were quotedare traded on the OTCQX under the symbol “FNCB.” Quarterly market highs and lows and dividends paid for each of the past two years are presented below. These prices represent actual transactions.
Market Price | Dividends Paid | |||||||||||
High | Low | Per Share | ||||||||||
Quarter | 2017 | 2017 | ||||||||||
First | $ | 7.50 | $ | 6.05 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||
Second | 8.13 | 6.35 | 0.03 | |||||||||
Third | 8.00 | 7.41 | 0.03 | |||||||||
Fourth | 7.99 | 6.54 | 0.04 | |||||||||
Quarter | 2016 | 2016 | ||||||||||
First | $ | 6.90 | $ | 5.11 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||
Second | 6.12 | 5.50 | 0.02 | |||||||||
Third | 6.00 | 4.75 | 0.02 | |||||||||
Fourth | 6.30 | 5.00 | 0.03 | |||||||||
On December 29, 2017, FNCB filed a listing application with The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”("Nasdaq"). under the symbol "FNCB."
On January 28, 2019, FNCB subsequently received approval from Nasdaq on February 26, 2018 to listannounced that it had commenced a public offering of its common shares for trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market®. FNCB’s shares of common stock began trading on Nasdaq effective within a firm commitment underwritten offering. On February 8, 2019, FNCB announced the market opening on Monday, March 5, 2018.closing of the public offering of 3,285,550 shares of its common stock, which includes 428,550 shares of common stock issued upon the exercise in full of the option to purchase additional shares granted to the underwriters, at a public offering price of $7.00 per share, less an underwriting discount of $0.35 per share. FNCB received net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses of $21.3 million.
Following the close of the U.S. Stock Market on June 29, 2020, FNCB was added as member of the Russell 2000® index, when FTSE Russell reconstituted its comprehensive set of U.S. global equity indexes. Previously, FNCB was added to the Russell 3000® index on July 1, 2019. Membership remains in place for one year. Each year, the annual Russell indexes reconstitution captures the 4,000 largest U.S. stocks and ranks them by total market capitalization. Russell indexes are widely used by investment managers and institutional investors for index funds and as benchmarks for active investment strategies. As such, management believes that inclusion in Russell indexes will continue to increase the visibility and liquidity of FNCB's common stock, as well as provide exposure to leading institutional investors.
On January 27, 2021, the Board of Directors of FNCB authorized a stock repurchase program under which up to 975,000 shares of FNCB's outstanding common stock may be acquired in the open market between February 3, 2021 and December 31, 2021 pursuant to a trading plan adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. Repurchases are administered through an independent broker and are subject to SEC regulations as well as certain price, market and timing constraints specified in the plan.
Holders
As of February 28 2018,, 2021, there were approximately 1,8111,671 holders of record of FNCB’s common shares. Because many of FNCB’s shares are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of shareholders, FNCB is unable to estimate the total number of shareholders represented by these record holders.
Dividends
FNCB had been under a Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia from November 24, 2010 until it was fullyDividends declared and completely released from the enforcement action on September 2, 2015. The Bank had been under a Consent Order with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency from September 1, 2010 until it was fully and completely released from the enforcement action on March 25, 2015. While under the Written Agreement, FNCB was precluded from paying dividends, and accordingly, did not pay dividends to shareholders during the tenure of the Written Agreement. FNCB resumed quarterly dividend payments effective with a quarterly dividend paid on March 15, 2016. In addition to the resumption of dividend payments, on April 27, 2016, FNCB’s Board of Directors approved the reinstatement of the Dividend Reinvestments and Stock Purchase Plan effective June 1, 2016.
On January 31, 2018, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.04were $4.4 million, or $0.22 per share, in 2020 and $4.0 million, or $0.20 per share, in 2019. The dividend payout ratio was 29.0%for the first quarter of 2018. The dividend is payable on March 15, 2018 to shareholders of record as of March 1, 2018.
year ended December 31, 2020 and 36.4% for the year ended December 31, 2019. It is the present intent of the Board of Directors to continue paying quarterly dividends going forward. However, FNCB’s ability to declare and pay future dividends is dependent upon earnings, financial position, appropriate restrictions under applicable laws, legal and regulatory restrictions and other factors relevant at the time FNCB’s Board of Directors considers any declaration of any dividends. For a further discussion of FNCB’s and the Bank’s dividend restrictions, refer to Note 14, “Regulatory Matters/Subsequent Events” in the notes to consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On January 27, 2021, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.06per share for the first quarter of 2021. The dividend is payable on March 15, 2021 to shareholders of record as of March 1, 2021.
Equity Compensation Plans
For more information regarding FNCB’s equity compensation plans, see Part III, Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return (i.e. price change, reinvestment of cash dividends and stock dividends received) on FNCB’s common stock against the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. Companies) Index, the SNL Bank Index for banks with $1 billion to $5 billion in assets, the KBW NASDAQ Regional Banking Index, and the SNL Bank NASDAQ Index. For the year ended December 31, 2017, FNCB elected to include the SNL Bank Index for banks with $1 billion to $5 billion in assets to replace the previously referenced SNL Bank Index for banks with $500 million to $1 billion in assets, as FNCB has remained over $1 billion in total assets for each of the preceding three years. The SNL Bank Index for banks with $500 million to $1 billion continues to be represented on the graph below for comparison purposes for 2017. The stock performance graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2012. The graph further assumes the reinvestment of dividends into additional shares of the same class of equity securities at the frequency with which dividends are paid on such securities during the relevant fiscal year. The yearly points marked on the horizontal axis correspond to December 31 of that year. FNCB calculates each of the referenced indices in the same manner. All are market-capitalization-weighted indices, so companies judged by the market to be more important (i.e. more valuable) count for more in all indices.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Selected Financial Data |
The selected consolidated financial and other data and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations set forth below and in Item 7 hereof is derived in part from, and should be read in conjunction with, FNCB’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere herein. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years’ consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year’s presentation. Those reclassifications did not impact net income.
For the Years Ended December 31, | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,162,305 | $ | 1,195,599 | $ | 1,090,618 | $ | 970,029 | $ | 1,003,808 | $ | 1,465,679 | $ | 1,203,541 | $ | 1,237,732 | $ | 1,162,305 | $ | 1,195,599 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities, available-for-sale | 290,387 | 276,015 | 257,042 | 219,989 | 204,867 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities, held-to-maturity | - | - | - | - | 2,308 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities | 350,035 | 272,839 | 296,032 | 290,387 | 276,015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loans | 761,609 | 722,860 | 721,926 | 657,747 | 628,880 | 889,152 | 819,529 | 829,581 | 761,609 | 722,860 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits | 1,002,448 | 1,015,139 | 821,546 | 795,336 | 884,698 | 1,287,448 | 1,001,709 | 1,095,629 | 1,002,448 | 1,015,139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds | 60,278 | 78,847 | 160,112 | 96,504 | 62,433 | 10,310 | 57,219 | 34,240 | 60,278 | 78,847 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity | 89,191 | 90,371 | 86,178 | 51,398 | 33,578 | 155,860 | 133,607 | 97,219 | 89,191 | 90,371 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 37,848 | $ | 34,748 | $ | 32,201 | $ | 32,673 | $ | 32,953 | $ | 46,338 | $ | 46,056 | $ | 45,085 | $ | 37,848 | $ | 34,748 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 4,800 | 4,197 | 4,801 | 6,147 | 7,176 | 6,160 | 9,796 | 8,578 | 4,800 | 4,197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 33,048 | 30,551 | 27,400 | 26,526 | 25,777 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 769 | 1,153 | (1,345 | ) | (5,869 | ) | (6,270 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for loan and lease losses | 40,178 | 36,260 | 36,507 | 33,048 | 30,551 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | 1,941 | 797 | 2,550 | 769 | 1,153 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 7,225 | 6,203 | 7,800 | 14,920 | 9,283 | 9,250 | 7,620 | 11,790 | 7,225 | 6,203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 28,069 | 27,545 | 28,464 | 33,569 | 34,948 | 28,915 | 29,682 | 29,327 | 28,069 | 27,545 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 11,435 | 8,056 | 8,081 | 13,746 | 6,382 | 18,572 | 13,401 | 16,420 | 11,435 | 8,056 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 11,288 | 1,747 | (27,759 | ) | 326 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 3,225 | 2,326 | 3,071 | 11,288 | 1,747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 147 | 6,309 | 35,840 | 13,420 | 6,382 | 15,347 | 11,075 | 13,349 | 147 | 6,309 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share, basic and diluted | 0.01 | 0.38 | 2.17 | 0.81 | 0.39 | 0.76 | 0.56 | 0.79 | 0.01 | 0.38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital and Related Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.09 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Book value per share | 5.32 | 5.43 | 5.22 | 3.12 | 2.04 | 7.70 | 6.62 | 5.78 | 5.32 | 5.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier I leverage ratio | 7.74 | % | 7.53 | % | 7.27 | % | 6.05 | % | 4.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital to risk-adjusted assets | 12.08 | % | 12.06 | % | 11.79 | % | 13.67 | % | 11.58 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier I leverage ratio (FNCB Bank only) | 9.57 | % | 10.36 | % | 8.27 | % | 8.24 | % | 8.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital to risk-adjusted assets (FNCB Bank only) | 15.79 | % | 13.70 | % | 12.17 | % | 12.49 | % | 12.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average equity to average total assets (1) | 8.36 | % | 8.42 | % | 5.64 | % | 4.66 | % | 3.60 | % | 10.61 | % | 10.32 | % | 7.10 | % | 8.36 | % | 8.42 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tangible equity to tangible assets | 7.67 | % | 7.56 | % | 7.89 | % | 5.27 | % | 3.30 | % | 10.63 | % | 11.10 | % | 7.85 | % | 7.67 | % | 7.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Performance Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets (1) | 0.01 | % | 0.57 | % | 3.57 | % | 1.38 | % | 0.67 | % | 1.13 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.09 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average equity (1) | 0.15 | % | 6.82 | % | 63.24 | % | 29.50 | % | 18.65 | % | 10.66 | % | 8.88 | % | 15.38 | % | 0.15 | % | 6.82 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (2) | 3.23 | % | 3.13 | % | 2.99 | % | 3.08 | % | 3.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (2) (3) | 3.35 | % | 3.29 | % | 3.22 | % | 3.23 | % | 3.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income/operating income (2) | 15.79 | % | 14.88 | % | 18.73 | % | 30.30 | % | 20.79 | % | 18.42 | % | 17.19 | % | 20.56 | % | 15.79 | % | 14.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Quality Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses/total loans | 1.17 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.72 | % | 2.18 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming loans/total loans | 0.34 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.99 | % | 0.62 | % | 1.10 | % | 0.56 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses/nonperforming loans | 350.43 | % | 376.86 | % | 232.05 | % | 208.62 | % | 219.87 | % | 214.12 | % | 98.53 | % | 202.7 | % | 350.43 | % | 376.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs/average loans | 0.02 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.20 | % | (0.51 | %) | (0.28 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan loss provision/net charge-offs | 499.35 | % | 75.66 | % | *** | *** | *** | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (recoveries) charge-offs/average loans | (0.12 | )% | 0.16 | % | 0.25 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan loss provision/net (recoveries) charge-offs | (183.29 | )% | 58.35 | % | 123.49 | % | 499.35 | % | 75.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*** Ratio is not meaningful for 2015, 2014 and 2013.
(1) Average balances were calculated using average daily balances. Average balances for loans include non-accrual loans.
(2) Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using the prevailing statutory rate of 34.0 percent.
(1) Average balances were calculated using average daily balances. Average balances for loans include non-accrual loans. |
(2) Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using rates of 21.0 percent for 2020, 2019 & 2018 and 34.0 percent for prior years. |
| (3) Ratio for 2019 reflects a revision to the average balance of earning assets to reclassify $4,794 in certain average deposits in other banks from interest-bearing deposits in other banks to non-earning assets. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) represents an overview of the financial condition and results of operations of FNCB and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Risk Factors detailed inSupplementary Data" and Item 1A, "Risk Factors" of Part I to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
FNCB is in the business of providing customary retail and commercial banking services to individuals, businesses and local governments and municipalities through its wholly-owned subsidiary, FNCB Bank’s 1817 full-service branch offices operated by FNCB Bank, FNCB's wholly-owned subsidiary, within its primary market area, Northeastern Pennsylvania, and a LPO based in Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
FNCB may from time to time make written or oral “forward-looking statements,” including statements contained in our filings with the SEC, in our reports to shareholders, and in our other communications, which are made in good faith by us pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to FNCB’sFNCB’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions, that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and are subject to change based on various factors (some of which are beyond our control). The words “may,” “could,” “should,” "will," “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan”“plan,” "project," "future" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause FNCB’s financial performance
Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumption that are difficult to predict, including those under "Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors," and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentionsthose expressed in suchany forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in our markets; the effects of, and changes in trade, monetary, corporate tax and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services; the ability of FNCB to compete with other institutions for business; the composition and concentrations of FNCB’s lending risk and the adequacy of our reserves to manage those risks; the valuation of FNCB’s investment securities; the ability of FNCB to pay dividends or repurchase common shares; the ability of FNCB to retain key personnel; the impact of any pending or threatened litigation against FNCB; the marketability of shares of FNCB stock and fluctuations in the value of FNCB’s share price; the effectiveness of FNCB’s system of internal controls; the ability of FNCB to attract additional capital investment; the impact of changes in financial services’ laws and regulations (including laws concerning capital adequacy, taxes, banking, securities and insurance); the impact of technological changes and security risks upon our information technology systems; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; the nature, extent, and timing of governmental actions and reforms, and the success of FNCB at managing the risks involved in the foregoing and other risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in FNCB’s filings with the SEC.
FNCB cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not all inclusive.statements. Readers are also cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which reflect management’smanagement’s analysis only as of the date of this report, even if subsequently made available by FNCB on its website or otherwise. FNCB does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of FNCB to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of condition and results of operations for the periods indicated. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
FNCB’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations. Management has identified the policies on the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”), securities’ valuation and impairment evaluation, the valuation of other real estate owned (“OREO”) and income taxes to be critical, as management is required to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and could be subject to revision as new information becomes available.
The judgments used by management in applying the critical accounting policies discussed below may be affected by changes and/or deterioration in the economic environment, which may impact future financial results. Specifically, subsequent evaluations of the loan portfolio, in light of the factors then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the ALLL in future periods, and the inability to collect on outstanding loans could result in increased loan losses. In addition, the valuation of certain securities in FNCB’s investment portfolio could be negatively impacted by illiquidity or dislocation in marketplaces resulting in significantly depressed market prices thus leading to impairment losses.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Management evaluates the credit quality of FNCB’s loan portfolio on an ongoing basis, and performs a formal review of the adequacy of the ALLL on a quarterly basis. The ALLL is established through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings and is maintained at a level management considers adequate to absorb estimated probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the evaluation date. Loans, or portions of loans, determined by management to be uncollectible are charged off against the ALLL, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the ALLL.
Determining the amount of the ALLL is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, qualitative factors, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. Banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination of FNCB, also review the ALLL, and may require, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, that certain loan balances be charged off or require that adjustments be made to the ALLL. Additionally, the ALLL is determined, in part, by the composition and size of the loan portfolio.
The ALLL consists primarily of two components, a specific component and a general component. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For such loans, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers all other loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted by qualitative factors. The general reserve component of the ALLL is based on pools of unimpaired loans segregated by loan segment and risk rating categories of “Pass”, “Special Mention” or “Substandard and Accruing.” Historical loss factors and various qualitative factors are applied based on the risk profile in each risk rating category to determine the appropriate reserve related to those loans. Substandard loans on nonaccrualnon-accrual status above the $100 thousand loan relationship threshold and all loans considered troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) are classified as impaired. Based on its evaluations, management may establish an unallocated component that is used to cover any inherent losses that exist as of the evaluation date, but which may not have been identified under the methodology.
See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 5, “Loans” of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information about the ALLL.
Securities Valuation and Evaluation for Impairment
Management utilizes various inputs to determine the fair value of its investment portfolio. To the extent they exist, unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets (Level 1) or quoted prices for similar assets or models using inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly (Level 2) are utilized to determine the fair value of each investment in the portfolio. In the absence of observable inputs or if markets are illiquid, valuation techniques are used to determine fair value of any investments that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement (Level 3). For Level 3 inputs, valuation techniques are based on various assumptions, including, but not limited to, cash flows, discount rates, adjustments for nonperformance and liquidity, and liquidation values. A significant degree of judgment is involved in valuing investments using Level 3 inputs. The use of different assumptions could have a positive or negative effect on FNCB’s financial condition or results of operations. See Note 4, “Securities” and Note 15, “Fair Value Measurements” of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information about FNCB’s securities valuation techniques.
On a quarterly basis, management evaluates individual investment securities in an unrealized loss position for other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”). The analysis ofevaluation for OTTI requires the use of various assumptions, including but not limited to, the length of time an investment’s fair value is less than book value, the severity of the investment’s decline, any credit deterioration of the issuer, whether management intends to sell the security, and whether it is more-likely-than-not that FNCB will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis. Debt investment securities deemed to have OTTI are written down by the impairment related to the estimated credit loss, and the non-credit related impairment loss is recognized in other comprehensive income. FNCB did not recognize any OTTI charges on investment securities for years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 20152019 within the consolidated statements of income.
See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 4, “Securities” of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information about valuation of securities.securities and management's evaluation for OTTI.
Other Real Estate Owned
OREO consists of property acquired by foreclosure, abandonment or conveyance of deed in-lieu of foreclosure of a loan, and bank premises that are no longer used for operation or for future expansion. OREO is held for sale and is initially recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell at the date of acquisition or transfer, which establishes a new cost basis. Upon acquisition of the property through foreclosure, or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, any adjustment to fair value less estimated selling costs is recorded to the ALLL. The determination is made on an individual asset basis. Bank premises no longer used for operations or future expansion are transferred to OREO at fair value less estimated selling costs with any related write-down included in non-interest expense. Subsequent to acquisition, valuations are periodically performed, and the assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated cost to sell. Fair value is determined through external appraisals, current letters of intent, broker price opinions or executed agreements of sale, unless management determines that conditions exist that warrant an adjustment to the value. Costs relating to the development and improvement of the OREO properties may be capitalized; holding period costs and any subsequent changes to the valuation allowance are charged to expense as incurred.
Income Taxes
The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in FNCB’s consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could impact our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
FNCB records an income tax provision or benefit based on the amount of tax, including alternative minimum tax currently payable or receivable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes. Management conducts quarterly assessments of all available positive and negative evidence to determine the amount of deferred tax assets that will more likely than not be realized. FNCB establishes a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and records a charge to income if management determines, based on available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, management considers past operating results, estimates of future taxable income based on approved business plans, future capital requirements and ongoing tax planning strategies. This evaluation process involves significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period depending on the related circumstances. The recognition of deferred tax assets requires management to make significant assumptions and judgments about future earnings, the periods in which items will impact taxable income, future corporate tax rates, and the application of inherently complex tax laws. The use of different estimates can result in changes in the amounts of deferred tax items recognized, which may result in equity and earnings volatility because such changes are reported in current period earnings. On December 31, 2010, management established a valuation allowance equal to 100 percent of FNCB’s net deferred tax asset, excluding deferred tax assets and liabilities related to unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, and maintained such an allowance through December 31, 2014. As part of its evaluation conducted as of December 31, 2015, management reviewed all the positive and negative evidence available at that time and concluded that significant positive evidence outweighed any negative evidence and the valuation allowance previously established for FNCB’s deferred tax assets should be reversed, except for the amount established for charitable contribution carryovers. Management’s subsequent evaluation as of December 31, 2016 concluded that the previously established valuation allowance for charitable contributions should be reversed,2020 and as such, FNCB did not have any valuation allowances for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016. Similarly, management’s evaluation as of December 31, 20172019 concluded that no valuation allowance was necessary for net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law “H.R.1.,” formally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), which among other things, reduces the federal maximum corporate income tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% effective January 1, 2018. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the enactment of this new tax legislation required FNCB to revalue its deferred tax assets at the new corporate statutory rate of 21.0% as of December 31, 2017. The revaluation of FNCB’s deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, resulted in a reduction in the value of its net deferred tax assets of $8.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, with a corresponding increase in the income tax provision. This revaluation adjustment had an impact of ($0.48) per diluted share, and tangible book value of ($0.48) per share based on weighted-average diluted shares for the year ended December 31, 2017 and shares outstanding at December 31, 2017, respectively. There was no significant impact to FNCB’s regulatory capital ratios or liquidity resulting from the revaluation.assets.
In connection with determining the income tax provision or benefit, management considers maintaining liabilities for uncertain tax positions and tax strategies that it believes contain an element of uncertainty. Periodically, management evaluates each of FNCB’s tax positions and strategies to determine whether a liability for uncertain tax benefits is required. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, management determined that FNCB did not have any uncertain tax positions or tax strategies and that no liability was required to be recorded.
See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 10, “Income Taxes” of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information about the accounting for income taxes.
New Authoritative Accounting Guidance and Accounting Guidance to be Adopted in Future Periods
For information regarding new authoritative accounting guidance adopted by FNCB during the year ended December 31, 20172020 and accounting guidance that FNCB will adopt in future periods, see Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Impact of COVID-19 and FNCB's response to the pandemic
In March 2020, the outbreak of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 ("COVID-19") was recognized as a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The spread of COVID-19 has created a global public health crisis that has resulted in, and continues to pose, unprecedented uncertainty, volatility and disruption in financial markets and in governmental, commercial and consumer activity in the United States and globally, including the markets that FNCB serves. Federal, state and local authorities have responded to the pandemic by mandating the closure of non-essential businesses and schools, travel restrictions, limitations on public gatherings, and social distancing protocols. These governmental restrictions, coupled with fear of contracting the virus, resulted in a disruption in financial markets including the rapid decline in commercial and consumer activity, loss of revenues by businesses, a severe spike in unemployment, global supply chain and market volatility. The federal government has taken several actions designed to mitigate the impact of the economic disruption. Specifically, the Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") responded by aggressively cutting the federal funds target rate 150 basis points in two emergency actions including a 50-basis point reduction on March 3, 2020; and a 100 basis point reduction on March 15, 2020. The federal funds target rate remained at 0.00% to 0.25% from this point through December 31, 2020. Additionally, on March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act, a $2.0 trillion legislative package, was signed into law. The CARES Act contains substantial tax and spending provisions including direct financial aid to American families, extensive emergency funding for hospitals and medical providers, and economic stimulus to significantly impacted industry sectors. Additionally, on December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 ("CA Act") was signed into law and authorized more than $900 billion in additional economic relief to small businesses and consumers.
As a financial institution, FNCB is considered essential and has remained open for business and is operating under its pandemic preparedness plan. To ensure the financial needs of its customers are addressed in a safe and consistent manner, the Bank's offices are open for regular business, with administrative, lending and community branch offices adhering to federal, state, and local governmental guidelines and social distancing mandates. However, in order to limit the spread of COVID-19 customers are encouraged to utilize FNCB's drive-thru facilities, automated teller machines, Customer Care center, remote deposit capture and online banking, including online account opening and chat capabilities, and mobile banking applications. FNCB is also providing the necessary technology, when needed, to its operational staff to work remotely in a secure environment. As of December 31, 2020, FNCB did not face any material resource constraints through the implementation of its pandemic preparedness plan.Throughout the year ended December 31, 2020, FNCB incurred COVID-19-related expenses including stay-at-home pay, computer-related costs, cleaning and sanitizing facilities and safety supplies, none of which were considered material. COVID-19 related expenses are included in non-interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. Additionally, FNCB has not tested for and has not identified any material operational or internal control challenges or risks, nor does it anticipate any significant challenges to its ability to maintain its systems and controls, related to operational changes resulting from the continued implementation of the pandemic preparedness plan.
Bank regulators issued guidance and have encouraged banks to work prudently with, and provide short-term payment accommodations to, borrowers affected by COVID-19. Additionally, provisions under the CARES Act originally allowed banks providing borrowers with a COVID-19 related modification to elect to not classify any such modification as a trouble debt restructuring ("TDR") if the loan was not more than 30 days past due at December 31, 2019 and the modification was executed between March 1, 2020, the date the President of the United States declared the COVID-19 pandemic a national emergency, and the earlier of 60 days after the date of termination of this national emergency, or December 31, 2020. The CA Act extended TDR relief provided under Section 4013 of the CARES Act through January 1, 2022, or 60 days after the termination of the national emergency. FNCB has applied, and continues to apply, the provisions of Section 4013 of the CARES Act and is prudently working with borrowers affected by COVID-19 by providing payment accommodations and other modifications, including but not limited to, payment deferrals involving either interest-only or full payment deferral for periods of up to six months. While interest and fees will still accrue to income, under normal GAAP accounting, should eventual credit losses on these deferred payments emerge, interest income and fees accrued would need to be reversed. As a result, interest income in future periods could be negatively impacted. While FNCB is unable to determine the effect of such an impact on its financial condition or results of operations at this time, it recognizes that the sustained economic impact may affect its borrowers’ ability to repay in future periods.
The CARES Act includes the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"), a program administered by the Small Business Administration ("SBA") designed to aid small- and medium-sized businesses through federally guaranteed loans distributed through banks. These loans were intended to guarantee up to 24 weeks of payroll and other costs to help those businesses remain viable and allow their workers to pay their bills. As an SBA Lender, the Bank actively participated in PPP loans assisting our small business community in securing this important funding. As of December 31, 2020, FNCB was able to serve 1,002 small business customers with PPP loans totaling $118.6 million. The CA Act that was enacted on December 27, 2020 provides an additional $284.6 billion in PPP funding to small businesses, including borrowers that previously received a PPP loan under the first round of funding. On January 19, 2021, FNCB began originating PPP loans as part of the second round of funding and as of February 28, 2021, has underwritten, submitted and received SBA approval for 400 loans representing approximately $52.7 million in funding. It is FNCB's understanding that loans funded through the PPP are fully guaranteed by the United States government. Should those circumstances change, FNCB could be required to increase its allowance for loan and lease losses related to these loans resulting in an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses.
The initial draw period of the first round of the PPP closed on August 8, 2020, and the SBA began accepting applications for forgiveness. FNCB notified and began providing ongoing assistance to customers with the forgiveness application process. As of December 31, 2020, FNCB had submitted 338 forgiveness applications to the SBA for PPP loans totaling $53.9 million and had received approval or funding from the SBA associated with a portion of these loans totaling $40.0 million. Additionally, the CA Act contains provisions that have simplified the forgiveness process for PPP loans under $150 thousand.
The Federal Reserve Bank also provided support lending to small and mid-sized businesses and not-for-profit organizations impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic through the Main Street Lending Program. Specifically, the Main Street Business Lending Program provides for five loan facilities with total potential funding of up to $600 billion. The Main Street New Loan Facility ("MSNLF"), the Main Street Priority Loan Facility ("MSPLF") and the Main Street Expanded Loan Facility ("MSELF") are three credit facilities that provide eligible business borrowers impacted by COVID-19 with financing in amounts ranging from $250 thousand to $300 million, depending on the facility. Terms of all three facilities include Federal Reserve Bank participation of 95.0%, lender participation of 5.0%, a maturity of 5 years, principal deferral for two years, interest deferral for one year and an adjustable interest rate based on one- or three-month LIBOR plus 300 basis points. Similarly, the Nonprofit Organization New Loan Facility ("NONLF") and the Nonprofit Organization Expanded Loan Facility ("NOELF") provide eligible not-for-profit organizations with financing in amounts ranging from $250 thousand to $10 million. The Bank had received approval from the Federal Reserve Bank as a participating lender in the Main Street Lending Program. During the second half of 2020, FNCB originated five MSPLF loans with an aggregate principal balance of $85.9 million and retained 5.0% of the outstanding principal balance or $4.3 million which was outstanding as of December 31, 2020. FNCB engaged an independent third-party loan review firm to confirm satisfactory underwriting and risk management practices were employed by management in the origination of these loans.
Fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact national, regional and local economies, as the number of confirmed cases spiked at the end of 2020 into early 2021. Management continues to monitor the loan portfolio in order to identify potential weakness and track exposures to borrowers and industries that may be impacted more acutely than others. Additionally, management continues to proactively reach out to specific borrowers to provide guidance and assistance as appropriate. On a portfolio level, management continues to monitor aggregate exposures to highly sensitive segments, such as hotels and hospitality, for changes in asset quality and payment performance, and liquidity levels. Management monitors unfunded commitments such as lines of credit and overdraft protection to determine liquidity and funding issues that may arise with our customers. FNCB engaged an independent third-party consultant to perform a Credit Stress Test analysis of the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2020 to assist management with evaluating the ALLL and capital planning with regard to any potential impacts of COVID-19 on the portfolio. Should economic conditions worsen, FNCB could experience further increases in its required allowance for loan and lease losses and record additional provisions for loan and lease losses. It is possible that FNCB’s asset quality metrics could be materially and adversely impacted in future periods if the effects of COVID-19 are prolonged.
Management expects the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as certain provisions of the CARES Act, CA Act and other recent legislative and regulatory relief efforts, to have a material impact on FNCB's operations. The full impact is unknown, continues to evolve and will be contingent upon the duration and severity of the economic downturn. At this time, management cannot determine or estimate the full magnitude of the impact and cannot provide any assurances as to how the crisis may ultimately affect FNCB's results of operations or financial position. The FNCB team will continue to work diligently to address any issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic in a safe and sound manner as they arise. Management believes that FNCB's balance sheet and capital position are strong and will allow FNCB to withstand the challenges that may be presented.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
The following overview should be read in conjunction with this MD&A in its entirety.
Results of Operations
The enactment of
FNCB reported earnings in 2017 of $0.12020 amounted to $15.3 million, or $0.01$0.76 per diluted common share, a decreasean increase of $6.2$4.2 million, or 97.7%38.6%, compared to $6.3$11.1 million, or $0.38$0.56 per diluted common share, in 2016.2019. The decreaseincrease in 20172020 net income compared to 20162019 was primarily attributable to the increase in income tax expense, offset in part by strong improvementincreases in net interest income and non-interest income coupled withand a reductiondecrease in non-interest expense. These positive factors were partially offset by increases in the provision for loan and lease losses.losses and income tax expense. Net interest income improved $2.5was $40.2 million in 2020, an increase of $3.9 million, or 8.2%10.8%, from $36.3 million in 2019, which was primarily due to a $3.6 million, or 37.1% reduction in total interest expense. Net interest income was also favorably impacted by $1.2 million in net loan origination fees associated with PPP loans that was recognized upon forgiveness. Non-interest income increased $1.6 million, or 21.4%, to $33.0$9.2 million in 20172020 from $30.5$7.6 million in 2016.2019. The improvement resulted primarily from solid growthyear over year increase in interest earning assets, higher yields on taxable loans and investments and reduced borrowing costs. Non-interestnon-interest income increased $1.0 million, or 16.5%, to $7.2 million in 2017 from $6.2 million in 2016. An increaselargely reflected increases in net gains on the sale ofequity securities, of $0.6 million, coupled with increases in other income and net gains on the sales of available-for-sale debt securities and mortgage loans guaranteedheld for sale, and deposit service charges, partially offset by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”)a reduction in loan referral fees/interest rate swap revenue. Non-interest expense decreased $767 thousand, or 2.6%, other real estate ownedto $28.9 million in 2020 from $29.7 million in 2019, which primarily reflected lower salaries and employee benefits, data processing costs and other repossessed assets, were the primary factors driving the increaseoperating expenses, partially offset by increases in non-interest income comparing 2017occupancy, equipment and 2016.bank shares tax expenses. The provision for loan and lease losses driven by a reductionincreased $1.1 million to $1.9 million in net charge-offs, decreased $0.4 million, or 33.3%, to2020, from $0.8 million in 2017 from $1.22019, which reflected additional credit provisioning in response to uncertainty brought on by the COVID-19 global pandemic. Income tax expense increased $0.9 million, or 38.6%, to $3.2 million in 2016. These positive factors were offset by a $0.5 million, or 1.9%, increase in non-interest expenses2020 as compared to $28.0$2.3 million in 2017 from $27.5 in 2016.
Return on average assets and return on average shareholders’ equity equaled 0.01%1.13% and 0.15%10.66%, respectively, in 2020, compared to 0.92% and 8.88%, respectively, in 2017, compared to 0.57% and 6.82%, respectively, in 2016. For the three months ended December 31, 2017, return on average assets and return on average shareholders’ equity were (2.09%) and (24.98%), respectively, compared to 0.55% and 6.43%, respectively, for the same three months of 2016.2019. FNCB paid dividends to holders of common stock of $0.13 $0.22per share and $0.09in 2020, an increase of $0.02 per share, foror 10.0%, compared to $0.20 per share in 2019. Total dividends declared and paid in 2020 equated to a dividend yield of approximately 3.44% based on the years endedclosing stock price of $6.40 per share on December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2020. The dividend payout ratio was 29.0% in 2020 compared to 36.4% in 2019.
Total assets decreased $33.3 increased $262.1million, or 2.8%21.8%, to $1.162$1.466 billion at December 31, 20172020 from $1.196$1.204 billion at December 31, 2016.2019. The decreasebalance sheet expansion primarily reflected a strong inflow of deposits, a portion of which was used to purchase investment securities, fund loans and reduce borrowed funds, with the remainder resulting in total assets was led by a reductionsubstantial increase in cash and cash equivalents. Specifically, cash and cash equivalents as cash was usedincreased $121.2 million, or 350.8% to fund growth in interest-earning assets and pay down borrowings, coupled with a reduction in interest-bearing deposits. Loans,$155.8 million at December 31, 2020 from $34.6 million at December 31, 2019. Available-for-sale debt securities increased $77.2 million, or 28.3%, to $350.0 million at December 31, 2020 from $272.8 million at December 31, 2019. In addition, loans, net of net deferred loan costs and unearned income, grew $39.3increased $72.6 million, or 5.4%8.8%, to $770.6$901.1 million at December 31, 20172020 from $731.3$828.5 million at December 31, 2016. In addition, securities available for sale2019 Total deposits increased $14.4$285.7 million, or 5.2%28.5%, to $290.4 million$1.287 billion at December 31, 20172020 from $276.0 million at the end of 2016. Total deposits decreased $12.7 million, or 1.3%, to $1.002 billion at December 31, 2017 from $1.015 billion2019. Borrowed funds decreased $46.9 million, or 82.0% to $10.3 million at December 31, 2016. The decrease in total deposits reflected cyclical deposit trends2020, compared to $57.2 million at December 31, 2019, as FNCB used some of public funds, coupled with the anticipated exitexcess liquidity to repay FHLB of short-term funds in the first quarter of 2017 that were received at the end of 2016 related to the sale of a municipal utility. Borrowed funds declined $18.6 million, including $13.6 million in advances fromPittsburgh advances. FNCB had no term or overnight borrowings through the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and $5.0 million in subordinated debentures.("FHLB") outstanding at December 31, 2020.
Total shareholders’ equity declined $1.2increased $22.3 million, or 1.3%16.7%, to $89.2$155.9 million at December 31, 20172020 from $90.4$133.6 million at December 31, 2019. Contributing to the endincrease in capital was net income in 2020 of 2016, which resulted primarily from dividends declared and paid of $2.2$15.3 million and ana $10.8 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive lossincome related primarily to appreciation in the fair value of $0.2available-for-sale debt securities, net of deferred taxes, partially offset by year-to-date dividends declared of $4.4 million. Partially offsetting these reductions in 2017 were common shares issued through the dividend reinvestment and optional cash purchase plans of $0.4 million, stock-based compensation of $0.3 million, and net income of $0.1 million.
At December 31, 20172020, FNCB’sFNCB Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio and the Tier 1 leverage ratio were 12.08%15.79% and 7.74%9.57%, respectively. The respective ratios for the Bank at December 31, 2017 were 12.49% and 8.24%. The ratios for both FNCB and the Bankrespectively, which exceeded the 10.00% and 5.00% required to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective action provisions of the Basel III capital framework for U.S. banking organizations.
Management’s Focus in 20120207
In 2017, management2020, FNCB Bank, FNCB's wholly-owned subsidiary, celebrated its 110th anniversary as a community bank serving the local communities in northeastern Pennsylvania with its mission to make the banking experience for customers "simply better". The celebration was tempered by COVID-19 as FNCB operated under its pandemic preparedness plan for the majority of 2020, which has continued into 2021. While managing the many challenges brought on by the spread of the virus, or by governmental, regulatory and customer response to the pandemic, FNCB's main focus in 2020 was to protect the health and safety of our customers and employees, provide support and assistance to businesses and others within the community, and respond to the abrupt shift in how bank products and services are delivered to the customer.
FNCB participated in the SBA's PPP, which resulted in the origination of 1,002 loans representing approximately $118.6 million in funding under the initial round of this program, that directly assisted local owners of small- and medium-sized businesses. Additionally, in the second half of 2020 when the SBA began accepting applications for forgiveness, FNCB implemented a digital, cloud-based management tool to facilitate the entire forgiveness process, providing customers with direct access to educational materials and the ability to easily upload required documents. As of December 31, 2020, FNCB had received $40.0 million in borrower forgiveness from the SBA and anticipate that the remaining PPP loan balances will qualify for borrower forgiveness under the guidelines of the program in 2021. In addition, FNCB became one of eleven select lenders in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania approved to participate in the Federal Reserve's Main Street Lending Program. In addition to these governmental programs, FNCB worked directly with borrowers to provide loan payment deferral modifications under Section 1048 of the Cares Act to qualifying commercial and consumer loan customers experiencing financial disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Initiatives to improve the customer experience included expanding and enhancing FNCB's electronic and traditional product and service offerings that became vital to our customers during this unprecedented time. In addition to already providing customers with electronic payment options including Apple Pay®, Google Pay®, and Samsung Pay®, during the third quarter of 2020, the Bank partnered with Zelle®, a fast, secure and contact free way to send and receive money between trusted parties. In addition, FNCB began expanding utilization of online account opening and facilitating the PPP loan origination and forgiveness process through the use of digital signatures. With regard to creating long-term shareholder value, management has been focused on developing strategies aimed at increasing netstrategic business market opportunities to drive FNCB's financial performance through efficient balance sheet and interest income through commercialrate risk management, growth and retail loan growth initiatives, improving retail delivery systems, strengthening corporate governance anddiversification of non-interest revenue streams, as well as enhancing the marketability and liquidity of FNCB’s common stock.FNCB's stock, which has aided the strong earnings performance.
Focus for 2021
In line with its commercialLooking ahead to 2021, maintaining a safe environment for both staff and retail loan growth initiatives, on January 20, 2017, FNCB openedcustomers will remain a LPO in Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, and began offering its retail and commercial lending products in this new market area. Additionally, in order to facilitate loan growth initiatives, on March 7, 2017, FNCB opened a lending center immediately adjacent to its main office in Dunmore, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania, which houses part of its commercial and retail lending units.
As part of its responsibilities, management regularly evaluates FNCB’s delivery system and facilities including analyzing each office’s operating efficiency, location, foot traffic, structure and design. As a result of these evaluations, on May 1, 2017, FNCB announced that the Bank will implement a comprehensive branch network improvement program that will focus on strengthening, better positioning and expanding its market coverage by developing new state-of-the-art customer facilities,top priority, as well as relocatingcontinuing to enhance FNCB's digital banking platforms to respond to evolving customer demands. FNCB expanded the digital cloud-based PPP forgiveness tool to include functionality for the application process for additional PPP funding that was approved under the CA Act on December 27, 2020. On January 19, 2021, FNCB began originating loans under the second round of PPP funding and consolidating select locations.as of February 28, 2021, has underwritten, submitted and received approval for 400 loans representing approximately $52.7 million in funding. FNCB will continue to assist business customers through the forgiveness process and with the second round of funding, as well as work prudently with customers requesting further payment accommodations. In 2021, FNCB expects to benefit from the recognition of approximately $3.0 million in remaining net loan origination fees from the first round of PPP loans, and will continue to focus on improving efficiency and effectively navigating impending margin compression resulting from the low-interest rate environment. Additional areas of focus for 2021 include continuing to enhance the customer experience through implementation of a comprehensive digital strategy, strengthening our customer base and building existing customer wallet share, as well as a renewed focus on leadership and organizational development. To this point, early in 2021, FNCB announced the appointment of a new Chief Banking Officer to its Executive Management Team. The Chief Banking Officer, who has extensive retail financial sales and managerial experience will oversee, FNCB's commercial lending, retail lending and retail banking units.
Stock Repurchase Program
FNCB is continuously focused on creating long-term shareholder value. With this in mind, on January 27, 2021, FNCB's Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program. The program provides for the purchase of up to 975,000 shares of FNCB's outstanding common stock in open market transactions beginning on February 3, 2021 and ending on December 31, 2021. Repurchases are made pursuant to a trading plan that was adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the branch network improvementSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Acquisitions under the program on June 30, 2017,will be administered through an independent broker at prevailing market prices. Repurchases are subject to SEC regulations as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the trading plan. Under the program, the purchases will be funded from available working capital presently available to FNCB, consolidated its branch office located at 1127 Texas Palmyra Highway, Honesdale, Wayne County, Pennsylvania with its branch located at 1001 Main Street, Honesdale, Pennsylvania.
As partand the repurchased shares will be returned to the status of this network improvement program, FNCB also announced its intentionauthorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. There is not a guarantee as to relocate three branches located in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania to a new location. The three branchesthe exact number of shares that will be relocated are: 1) a branch located at 734 San Souci Parkway, Hanover Township, Pennsylvania; 2) a branch located at 27 North River Street, Plains, Pennsylvania; and 3) a branch located at 3 Old Boston Road, Pittston, Pennsylvania. These three branches will be relocated into a brand-new facility to be built in the Richland 315 development located at 1150 Route 315, Wilkes-Barre (Plains Township), Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. FNCB currently leases the three branches, as well as the aforementioned Honesdale branch, that was consolidated, and will lease the future Luzerne County facility. FNCB did not incur any significant disposal costs on the Wayne County consolidation and does not expect to incur any significant disposal costs on Luzerne County branch consolidation. The construction of the new Luzerne County facility began in the fourth quarter of 2017 and is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2018, at which time the Luzerne County branch consolidation will occur. The three existing branches will continue to operate as full-service branches until that time.
Following continued analysis of FNCB’s locations and facilities, on September 27, 2017, the Board of Directors approved the purchase of the Bank’s corporate center located at 200 South Blakely Street, Dunmore, Pennsylvania, for $2.15 million. FNCB has been leasing this property since 1994. The purchase of the corporate center, which was funded by cash generated by operations, was finalized on January 15, 2018. The purchase of this building is anticipated to reduce occupancy expenses in excess of $100,000 annually going forward.
The network improvement program also calls for the continued evaluation of FNCB’s delivery systems. In the second quarter of 2017, FNCB commenced a project to upgrade its entire automated teller machine network. In addition, in 2018 management plans to evaluate the development of new state-of-the-art facilities on properties already ownedrepurchased by FNCB, located in Dunmore, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania and in Taylor Borough, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania. Also in 2018,FNCB may discontinue purchases at any time that management plans to implement a bank-wide customer relationship management (“CRM”) system to improve customer service, enhance market share and create cross-sales opportunities between retail and commercial business units.
With respect to strengthening FNCB’s corporate governance structure, on September 27, 2017, the board of directors of FNCB and the Bank elected three new independent members to the boards of both entities. The addition of the new members extends both boards to 12 directors. On the same date, the board of directors also approved the formation of a community advisory board to consist of members from Northeastern Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley who will advise, support and serve as liaisons for the Bank in developing and furthering relationships with businesses and the community in our market area. The initial advisory board members were appointed on January 31, 2018.
In addition to expanding the board and approving the formation of an advisory board, on September 27, 2017, the Board of Directors approved revisions to its Corporate Governance Guidelines to set a retirement age for FNCB’s and the Bank’s directors and executive officers. According to the approved revisions,determines additional repurchases are no person can be nominated to serve as a Director after he or she has passed his or her 80th birthday. In the event that a director turns the age of 80 during his or her term as a Director, he or she may serve the remaining time of his or her term until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of his or her death, resignation or removal. In addition, FNCB’s and the Bank’s executive officers are now subject to a mandatory retirement age of 75. Such retirement age may be waived for the President and Chief Executive Officer for strategic planning purposes in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors of FNCB and the Bank
Aligned with enhancing the marketability and liquidity of FNCB’s stock on December 29, 2017, FNCB filed a listing application with The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”). FNCB subsequently received approval from Nasdaq on February 26, 2018 to list its common shares for trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market®. FNCB’s shares of common stock began trading on Nasdaq effective with the market opening on Monday, March 5, 2018.longer warranted.
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Net Interest Income
2017 compared to 2016
Net interest income is the difference between (i) interest income, interest and fees on interest-earning assets, and (ii) interest expense, interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest income represents the largest component of FNCB’s operating income and, as such, is the primary determinant of profitability. Net interest income is impacted by variations in the volume, rate and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, changes in general market rates and the level of non-performing assets. Interest income is shown on a fully tax-equivalent basis and is calculated by adjusting tax-free interest using FNCB’s historic federal marginalthe corporate statutory tax rate of 34.0% to equate the income to that of taxable interest.21.0% in 2020, 2019 and 2018.
SinceIn 2020, in response to economic fallout from the first 25-basis point increase in the federal funds target rate on December 16, 2015,global pandemic, the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) increasedreduced the federal funds target rate a total of 100150 basis points in four 25-basistwo emergency actions: a 50 basis point actionsdecrease on December 14, 2016, March 15, 2017, June 14, 2017 and December 13, 2017.3, 2020 followed by another 100 basis point decrease on March 16, 2020. The federal funds target rate remained at 0.00% to 0.25% from this point through the remainder of 2020. These actions resulted in a corresponding increasesdecrease in the national prime rate. At rate to 3.25% at December 31, 2017, the national prime rate was 4.50%, 75 basis points higher than 3.75%2020 from 4.75% at December 31, 2016.2019. As a result, FNCB experienced an increasea decrease in loan yields throughout 2017 as 2020, compared to 2016, as variable-2019. In addition, loan yields were impacted by the origination and adjustable-ratefunding of low-yielding PPP loans repriced upward.with a rate of 1.0%, offset by the recognition of net loan origination fees associated with a portion of these loans that were forgiven by the SBA. The increaseBank remained competitive in deposit rate offerings, parallel to market interest rates has also led to notable increasesconditions and a surplus of liquidity within the industry. As a result, FNCB experienced a decrease in funding costs.costs across interest-bearing deposits.
Tax-equivalent net interest incomeimprovedincreased in 2017, increasing $2.52020, by $4.3 million, or 11.7%, to $33.8$41.0 million compared to $31.3$36.7 million in 2016.2019. The 7.9% increase in tax-equivalent net interest income primarily reflected a $3.1$3.6 million decreasein interest expense, coupled with a $0.6 million increase in tax-equivalent interest income, partially offset by a $0.6 million increase in interest expense. Tax-equivalent interest income in 2017 was positively impacted by increases in the yields earned across all interest-earning asset categories, coupled with significant growth in average earning assets. income. The increasedecrease in interest expense largely reflected an increasesignificant reductions in the rates paid on interest-bearing demand deposits, partially mitigated bytime deposits, and borrowed funds. Also factoring into the decrease in interest expense was a reductiondecrease in the interest expense paid on borrowings attributable to lower average balancesbalance of higher-costing borrowed funds.
Average borrowed funds decreased $12.3 million, or 19.4%, to $51.3 million in 2020 from $63.6 million in 2019. Due to the decrease in deposit rates, FNCB experienced some deposit migration, as customers redirected maturing time deposits into non-maturity deposits. Tax-equivalent interest income in 2020 was negatively impacted by lower rates on average earning assets,which was more than entirely offset by the increase in the overall volumes of average earning assets. FNCB’s tax-equivalent interest margin improved 10increased 6 basis points to 3.23%3.35% in 20172020 from 3.13%3.29% in 2016.2019. Tax-equivalent net interest margin, a key measurement used in the banking industry to measure income from earning assets relative to the cost to fund those assets, is calculated by dividing tax-equivalent net interest income by average interest-earning assets. RateAdditionally, rate spread, the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets shown on a fully tax-equivalent basis and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, was 3.13% for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of 8increased 13 basis points to 3.21% in 2020 compared to 3.05% for the year ended December 31, 2016.3.08% in 2019.
Tax-equivalent interest income increased A decrease in funding costs was the driving factor that lead to the$3.13.6 million, or 8.6%37.1%, to $38.6 million in 2017 from $35.5 million in 2016. The growth in tax-equivalent interest income reflected a 13-basis point improvement in the tax-equivalent yield on average earning assets to 3.68% in 2017 from 3.55% in 2016. Comparing 2017 and 2016, the tax-equivalent yield earned on the loan portfolio increased 19 basis points, the tax-equivalent yield earned on the investment portfolio increased 16 basis points, and the tax-equivalent yield earned on interest-bearing deposits in other banks increased 54 basis points, contributing $1.4 million, $0.5 million, and $0.1 million, respectively, to the improvement in tax-equivalent interest income. Accompanying the improvement in the tax-equivalent yields was strong growth in interest-earning assets, which increased $45.7 million, or 4.6%. Average loans increased $9.7 million, or 1.3%, to $732.3 million in 2017 from $725.6 million, resulting in an increase to tax-equivalent interest income of $0.3 million. In addition, average investments increased $25.2 million, or 9.5%, to $290.0 million in 2017 from $264.8 million in 2016, resulting in an increase to tax-equivalent interest income of $0.7 million, and average interest-bearing deposits in other banks increased $10.8 million, or 152.1%, to $17.9 million in 2017 from $7.1 million in 2016, resulting in an increase to tax-equivalent interest income of $0.1 million.
Increases in interest rates also drove an increasedecrease in interest expense of $0.6to $6.2 million or 14.4%, to $4.8in 2020 from $9.8 million in 2017 from $4.2 million in 2016.2019. Rates paid on interest-bearing deposits increased 7decreased 37 basis points to 0.44%0.59% in 20172020 from 0.37%0.96% in 2016.2019, resulting in a corresponding decrease to interest expense of $2.8 million. The increase decreasein deposit rates was concentrated in other time deposits, which decreased 38 basis points to 1.22% in 2020, compared to 1.60% in 2019. In addition, interest-bearing demand deposits, which increased 14decreased 33 basis points to 0.36%0.48% in 20172020 as compared to 0.22%0.81% in 2016, resulting2019. The reduction in an increase to interest expense of $0.7 million. The rate paid on savings deposits increased to a lesser extent, increasing by only 3 basis points to 0.13% in 2017 from 0.10% in 2016, while the raterates paid on time deposits remained steady at 0.80% for both 2017 and 2016. Similarly, the rate paid on borrowed funds increased 34 basis points to 1.76% in 2017 from 1.42% in 2016, contributing $0.3interest-bearing demand deposits contributed $1.9 million and $0.8 million to the overall increase in interest expense.
Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $30.8 million, or 3.6%, to $875.1 million in 2017 from $844.3 million in 2016. Despite the increase, changes in the volumes of interest-bearing liabilities resulted in a $0.4 million decrease in interest expense, as a reduction in higher-costing average borrowed funds more than offset an increase in lower-costing average interest-bearing deposits. Specifically, a $30.4 million, or 29.5%, decrease in average borrowed funds to $72.8 million in 2017 from $103.2 million in 2016 resulted in a reduction to interest expense of $0.5 million. The decline in interest expense paid on borrowed funds was partially offset by an $88 thousand increase in interest expense resulting from a $61.2 million, or 8.3%, increase in average interest-bearing deposits to $802.3 million in 2017 from $741.1 million in 2016. An increase in municipal deposits was the primary factor contributing to an increase of $67.1 million, or 15.4%, in average interest-bearing demand deposits to $502.2 million in 2017 from $435.1 million in 2016, which led to an increase in interest expense of $168 thousand. In addition, average savings deposits increased $4.8 million, or 4.9%, to $102.0 million in 2017 from $97.2 million in 2016, which caused a corresponding increase in interest expense of $5 thousand. Partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in the average balance of time deposits of $10.6 million, or 5.1%, to $198.1 million in 2017 from $208.8 million in 2016, which resulted in an $85 thousand reduction in interest expense.
2016 compared to 2015
Tax-equivalent net interest income in 2016 improved $3.2 million to $31.3 million compared to $28.1 million in 2015. The 11.2% increase in tax-equivalent net interest income primarily reflected a $2.5 million increase in tax-equivalent interest income, coupled with a $0.6 million reduction in interest expense. Tax-equivalent interest income was positively impacted by an increase in average earning assets, coupled with a slight increase in the yield earned on loans and investment securities. The decrease in interest expense largely reflected a reduction in funding costs due to the realization of a full year of the modification of the interest rate of the subordinated debentures from 9.0% to 4.5% during 2015. In addition, FNCB’s cost of funds was also favorably impacted by a reduction in the rate paid on other time deposits, as higher-costing certificates of deposit matured and were reinvested at lower rates. FNCB’s tax-equivalent interest margin improved 14 basis points to 3.13% in 2016 from 2.99% in 2015. Similarly, FNCB’s rate spread increased 16 basis points to 3.05% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 2.89% for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Tax-equivalent interest income increased $2.5 million, or 7.7%, to $35.5 million in 2016 from $32.9 million in 2015. The growth in tax-equivalent interest income comparing 2016 and 2015 reflected strong growth in interest-earning assets, as average loans increased $33.2 million, or 4.8%, resulting in an increase to tax-equivalent interest income of $1.3 million, and average investments increased $36.3 million or 15.9%, resulting in an increase to tax-equivalent interest income of $0.9 million. Accompanying the growth in average earning assets was a 5-basis point improvement in the tax-equivalent yield on average earning assets to 3.55% in 2016 from 3.50% in 2015. Specifically, the tax-equivalent yield earned on the loan portfolio increased 2 basis points, while the tax-equivalent yield earned on the investment portfolio increased 8 basis points, contributing $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, to the improvement in tax-equivalent interest income. The tax-equivalent yield earned on interest-bearing deposits in other banks improved 22 basis points, reflecting the 25-basis point increase in the federal funds target rate on December 16, 2015. However, the increase was more than offset by a decrease in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits in other banks of $11.0 million, or 60.8%.
Interest expense decreased $0.6 million, or 12.6%, to $4.2 million in 2016 from $4.8 million in 2015. The decrease in interest expense was driven almost entirely by an 11-basis point decrease in the cost of funds to 0.50% in 2016 compared to 0.61% in 2015, which resulted in a $0.6 million corresponding decrease in interest expense due to changes in interest rates. Specifically, the modification of the interestThe rate paid on the Notes from 9.0%savings deposits decreased slightly to 4.5% effective July 1, 20150.10% in 2020 compared to 0.13% in 2019 but had the greatestminimal impact on interest expense, as it wasexpense. Additionally, the leading factor driving a 59-basis point decreaserate paid on borrowed fundsdecreased 119 basis points to 1.47% in the cost of borrowed funds to 1.42%2020 from 2.66% in 2016 from 2.01% in 2015. The decrease in borrowing costs resulted in a2019,contributing $0.6 million reductionto the overall decrease in interest expense. Partially offsettingAlso contributing to the decrease in borrowing costs was a slight increase in FNCB’s cost of interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits of 3 basis points each, which were more than offset by a 5-basis point decrease in the cost of time deposits. Changes in the average deposit rates resulted in a $66 thousand increase in interest expense.
Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $61.8 million, or 7.9%, to $844.3 million in 2016 from $782.5 million in 2015. Despite the increase, changes in the volumes of interest-bearing liabilities resulted in a $66 thousand decrease in interest expense, as a reduction in higher-costing average borrowed funds more than offset an increase in lower-costing average interest-bearing deposits. Specifically, a $4.7 million, or 4.4%, decrease in average borrowed funds, resulted in a reduction to interest expense of $99 thousand. The decline in interest expense paid on borrowed funds was partially offset by a $33 thousand increase in interest expenses resulting from a $66.5 million increase in average interest-bearing deposits. An increase in municipal deposits was the primary factor contributing to an increase of $76.7$12.3 million, or 21.4%19.4%, in average interest-bearing demand deposits, which led to an increase in interest expense of $158 thousand. Partially offsetting this increase was a decrease in the average balance of timeother borrowed funds to $51.3 million in 2020 from $63.6 million in 2019, which led to a corresponding decrease in interest expense of $0.3 million. While FNCB experienced significant deposit growth, changes in average volumes of interest-bearing deposits of $15.6resulted in only a negligible increase to interest expense, which reflected the deposit migration experienced in 2020. Total average interest-bearing deposits increased $63.7 million, or 7.0%7.5%, to $908.5 million in 2020 from $844.8 million in 2019, which resulted in a $129an $86 thousand reductionincrease in interest expense. Specifically, the average balance of time deposits decreased $43.0 million, or 18.1%, to $195.1 million in 2020 from $238.1 million in 2019. The decrease in average time deposits resulted in a corresponding decrease to interest expense of $0.6 million, which was more than entirely offset by a $98.0 million, or 19.1%, increase in average interest-bearing demand deposits to $611.5 million in 2020 as compared to $513.5 million in 2019, which caused an increase to interest expense by $0.7 million.
Tax-equivalent interest income increased $0.6 million, or 1.4%, to $47.1 million in 2020 from $46.5 million in 2019, which reflected higher volumes of average earning assets, partially offset by lower earning asset yields. Average earning assets increased $106.2 million, or 9.5%, to $1.223 billion in 2020 from $1.117 billion in 2019, resulting in a corresponding increase to tax-equivalent interest income of $4.5 million. However, the tax-equivalent yield on earning assets fell 31 basis points to 3.85% in 2020 from 4.16% in 2019, which caused a partially offsetting decrease to tax-equivalent interest income of $3.9 million. Changes in the composition of FNCB's investments portfolio was able to mitigate the impact of lower market rates. Overall, changes in volumes and rates on the the investment portfolio contributed $1.0 million in tax-equivalent interest income. Specifically, average investments increased $22.8 million, or 8.2% to $302.2 million in 2020 from $279.4 million in 2019, primarily due to the increase in tax-free securities, which averaged $51.4 million in 2020 compared to $4.6 million in 2019. Conversely, taxable securities averaged $250.9 million in 2020, a decrease of $23.8 million, or 8.7%, from $274.7 million in 2019. The shift in composition of FNCB's investment portfolio reflected the change in its income tax position, as the majority of available NOL carryforwards were consumed in 2020. The tax-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio increased 10 basis points to 3.00% in 2020 from 2.90% in 2019. Conversely, changes in volumes and rates on the loan portfolio and interest-bearing deposits in other banks resulted in decreases to tax-equivalent interest income of $0.2 million each. Specifically, average loans increased $82.0 million, or 9.9%, to $911.4 million in 2020 compared to $829.4 million in 2019, resulting in a corresponding increase to tax-equivalent interest income of $3.6 million. The tax-equivalent yield earned on the loan portfolio decreased 43 basis points to 4.18% in 2020 from 4.61% in 2019, which caused a decrease to tax-equivalent interest income of $3.8 million. The impact on changes in loan volumes and rates largely reflected the origination of PPP loans. PPP loans, which carry an interest rate of 1.00%, averaged $76.9 million in 2020. Including amortization of net origination fees associated with PPP loans of $1.2 million, the yield on PPP loans was 2.61% in 2020. Tax-equivalent yield on average interest-bearing deposits decreased 208 basis points to 0.30% in 2020 from 2.38% in 2019, resulting in a $195 thousand decrease in tax equivalent interest income, which was slightly offset by the $1.3 million, or 16.4%, increase in volume to $9.2 million in 2020 from $7.9 million in 2019.
Non-accrual loans
The interest income that would have been earned on non-accrual and restructured loans, outstanding at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015had these loans performed in accordance with their original terms approximated $157 thousand, $221 thousand,$0.4 million for both years ended December 31, 2020 and $406 thousand, respectively. Interest2019. Additionally, interest income recognized on impaired loans of $392 thousand, $202 thousand, and $258 thousand was recognized based on payments received in 2017, 2016approximated $0.4 million for both years ended December 31, 2020 and 2015, respectively.2019.
The following table presents the components of net interest income for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
Summary of Net Interest Income
Year ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Interest | Cost | Balance | Interest | Cost | Balance | Interest | Cost | Balance | Interest | Cost | Balance | Interest | Cost | Balance | Interest | Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning assets (2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans-taxable (4) | $ | 697,377 | $ | 28,519 | 4.09 | % | $ | 682,289 | $ | 26,623 | 3.90 | % | $ | 653,303 | $ | 25,256 | 3.87 | % | $ | 863,702 | $ | 35,980 | 4.17 | % | $ | 784,124 | $ | 36,332 | 4.63 | % | $ | 783,438 | $ | 34,714 | 4.43 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans-tax free (4) | 40,903 | 1,973 | 4.82 | % | 46,305 | 2,076 | 4.48 | % | 42,135 | 1,988 | 4.72 | % | 47,669 | 2,070 | 4.34 | % | 45,246 | 1,881 | 4.16 | % | 52,251 | 2,110 | 4.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans (1)(2) | 738,280 | 30,492 | 4.13 | % | 728,594 | 28,699 | 3.94 | % | 695,438 | 27,244 | 3.92 | % | 911,371 | 38,050 | 4.18 | % | 829,370 | 38,213 | 4.61 | % | 835,689 | 36,824 | 4.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities-taxable | 288,823 | 7,798 | 2.70 | % | 263,624 | 6,676 | 2.53 | % | 226,122 | 5,478 | 2.42 | % | 250,881 | 7,322 | 2.92 | % | 274,739 | 7,901 | 2.88 | % | 302,418 | 8,483 | 2.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities-tax free | 1,212 | 74 | 6.11 | % | 1,192 | 70 | 5.87 | % | 2,419 | 165 | 6.82 | % | 51,367 | 1,738 | 3.38 | % | 4,618 | 189 | 4.09 | % | 4,087 | 168 | 4.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total securities (1)(5) | 290,035 | 7,872 | 2.71 | % | 264,816 | 6,746 | 2.55 | % | 228,541 | 5,643 | 2.47 | % | 302,248 | 9,060 | 3.00 | % | 279,357 | 8,090 | 2.90 | % | 306,505 | 8,651 | 2.82 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks | 17,874 | 180 | 1.01 | % | 7,089 | 33 | 0.47 | % | 18,076 | 46 | 0.25 | % | 9,203 | 28 | 0.30 | % | 7,910 | 188 | 2.38 | % | 4,667 | 88 | 1.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets | 1,046,189 | 38,544 | 3.68 | % | 1,000,499 | 35,478 | 3.55 | % | 942,055 | 32,933 | 3.50 | % | 1,222,822 | 47,138 | 3.85 | % | 1,116,637 | 46,491 | 4.16 | % | 1,146,861 | 45,563 | 3.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-earning assets | 99,993 | 107,061 | 73,587 | 145,227 | 101,273 | 84,283 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses | (8,626 | ) | (8,684 | ) | (10,729 | ) | (10,867 | ) | (9,359 | ) | (9,584 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,137,556 | $ | 1,098,876 | $ | 1,004,913 | $ | 1,357,182 | $ | 1,208,551 | $ | 1,221,560 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 502,170 | 1,800 | 0.36 | % | $ | 435,092 | 973 | 0.22 | % | $ | 358,442 | 672 | 0.19 | % | $ | 611,511 | 2,933 | 0.48 | % | $ | 513,542 | 4,167 | 0.81 | % | $ | 502,978 | 2,881 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits | 101,952 | 136 | 0.13 | % | 97,188 | 94 | 0.10 | % | 91,603 | 60 | 0.07 | % | 101,847 | 97 | 0.10 | % | 93,114 | 124 | 0.13 | % | 98,927 | 133 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits | 198,143 | 1,585 | 0.80 | % | 208,783 | 1,663 | 0.80 | % | 224,538 | 1,899 | 0.85 | % | 195,140 | 2,374 | 1.22 | % | 238,145 | 3,810 | 1.60 | % | 236,162 | 2,911 | 1.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 802,265 | 3,521 | 0.44 | % | 741,063 | 2,730 | 0.37 | % | 674,583 | 2,631 | 0.39 | % | 908,498 | 5,404 | 0.59 | % | 844,801 | 8,101 | 0.96 | % | 838,067 | 5,925 | 0.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds and other interest-bearing liabilities | 72,795 | 1,279 | 1.76 | % | 103,239 | 1,467 | 1.42 | % | 107,965 | 2,170 | 2.01 | % | 51,287 | 756 | 1.47 | % | 63,640 | 1,695 | 2.66 | % | 119,573 | 2,653 | 2.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 875,060 | 4,800 | 0.55 | % | 844,302 | 4,197 | 0.50 | % | 782,548 | 4,801 | 0.61 | % | 959,785 | 6,160 | 0.64 | % | 908,441 | 9,796 | 1.08 | % | 957,640 | 8,578 | 0.90 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits | 156,670 | 148,746 | 139,945 | 242,017 | 164,035 | 168,313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 10,770 | 13,263 | 25,744 | 11,368 | 11,395 | 8,831 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity | 95,056 | 92,565 | 56,676 | 144,012 | 124,680 | 86,776 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 1,137,556 | $ | 1,098,876 | $ | 1,004,913 | $ | 1,357,182 | $ | 1,208,551 | $ | 1,221,560 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income/interest rate apread (6) | 33,744 | 3.13 | % | 31,281 | 3.05 | % | 28,132 | 2.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income/interest rate spread (6)(7) | 40,978 | 3.21 | % | 36,695 | 3.08 | % | 36,985 | 3.07 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent adjustment | (696 | ) | (730 | ) | (732 | ) | (800 | ) | (435 | ) | (478 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income as reported | $ | 33,048 | $ | 30,551 | $ | 27,400 | $ | 40,178 | $ | 36,260 | $ | 36,507 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin | 3.23 | % | 3.13 | % | 2.99 | % | 3.35 | % | 3.29 | % | 3.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Interest income is presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a |
(2) | Loans are stated net of unearned income. | ||
(3) | Non-accrual loans are included in loans within earning assets. | ||
(4) |
| ||
(5) | The yields for securities that are classified as available for sale are based on the average historical amortized cost. | ||
| (6) | Information for 2019 includes revisions to average balances to reclassify certain average deposits in other banks from interest-bearing deposits in other banks to non-earning assets in the amount of $4,794. | ||
| Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest earning assets and the cost of average interest bearing liabilities and is presented on a tax equivalent basis. | ||
| Net interest income as a percentage of total average interest earning assets. |
|
The most significant impact on net income between periods is derived from the interaction of changes in the volume and rates earned or paid on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The volume of earning assets, specifically loans and investments, compared to the volume of interest-bearing liabilities represented by deposits and borrowings, combined with the spread, produces the changes in net interest income between periods. Components of interest income and interest expense are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using FNCB’s historic statutory federal income tax rate of 34%.
The following table summarizes the effect that changes in volumes of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned and paid on these assets and liabilities have on net interest income. The net change or mix component attributable to the combined impact of rate and volume changes has been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.
Rate Volume Analysis
For the Year Ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 vs. 2016 | 2016 vs. 2015 | 2020 vs. 2019 | 2019 vs. 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans - taxable | $ | 598 | $ | 1,298 | $ | 1,896 | $ | 1,129 | $ | 238 | $ | 1,367 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans - tax free | (253 | ) | 150 | (103 | ) | 190 | (102 | ) | 88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans-taxable | $ | 3,501 | $ | (3,853 | ) | $ | (352 | ) | $ | 30 | $ | 1,588 | $ | 1,618 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans-tax free | 103 | 86 | 189 | (290 | ) | 61 | (229 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans | 345 | 1,448 | 1,793 | 1,319 | 136 | 1,455 | 3,604 | (3,767 | ) | (163 | ) | (260 | ) | 1,649 | 1,389 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities - taxable | 663 | 459 | 1,122 | 941 | 257 | 1,198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities - tax free | 1 | 3 | 4 | (74 | ) | (21 | ) | (95 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities-taxable | (695 | ) | 116 | (579 | ) | (792 | ) | 210 | (582 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities-tax free | 1,587 | (38 | ) | 1,549 | 22 | (1 | ) | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total securities | 664 | 462 | 1,126 | 867 | 236 | 1,103 | 892 | 78 | 970 | (770 | ) | 209 | (561 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks | 83 | 64 | 147 | (38 | ) | 25 | (13 | ) | 35 | (195 | ) | (160 | ) | 73 | 27 | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income | 1,092 | 1,974 | 3,066 | 2,148 | 397 | 2,545 | 4,531 | (3,884 | ) | 647 | (957 | ) | 1,885 | 928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits | 168 | 659 | 827 | 158 | 143 | 301 | 692 | (1,926 | ) | (1,234 | ) | 62 | 1,224 | 1,286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits | 5 | 37 | 42 | 4 | 30 | 34 | 11 | (38 | ) | (27 | ) | (8 | ) | (1 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits | (85 | ) | 7 | (78 | ) | (129 | ) | (107 | ) | (236 | ) | (617 | ) | (819 | ) | (1,436 | ) | 25 | 874 | 899 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 88 | 703 | 791 | 33 | 66 | 99 | 86 | (2,783 | ) | (2,697 | ) | 79 | 2,097 | 2,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds and other interest-bearing liabilities | (489 | ) | 301 | (188 | ) | (99 | ) | (604 | ) | (703 | ) | (284 | ) | (655 | ) | (939 | ) | (1,415 | ) | 457 | (958 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | (401 | ) | 1,004 | 603 | (66 | ) | (538 | ) | (604 | ) | (198 | ) | (3,438 | ) | (3,636 | ) | (1,336 | ) | 2,554 | 1,218 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income | $ | 1,493 | $ | 970 | $ | 2,463 | $ | 2,214 | $ | 935 | $ | 3,149 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 4,729 | $ | (446 | ) | $ | 4,283 | $ | 379 | $ | (669 | ) | $ | (290 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is an expense charged against net interest income to provide for probable losses attributable to uncollectible loans and is based on management’s analysis of the adequacy of the ALLL. A credit to loan and lease losses reflects the reversal of amounts previously charged to the ALLL. Management closely monitors the loan portfolio and the adequacy of the ALLL by considering the underlying financial performance of the borrower, collateral values and associated credit risks. Future material adjustments may be necessary to the provision for loan and lease losses and the ALLL if economic conditions or loan performance differ substantially from the assumptions management considered in its evaluation of the ALLL. The provision
During 2020, management took into consideration the potential adverse impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on economic conditions in its application of FNCB's methodology on the allowance for loan and lease losses is an expense charged against net interest incomelosses. Specifically, management tried to provide for probable losses attributable to uncollectible loansaddress this adverse impact by adjusting the qualitative factor associated with changes in national, local and is based onbusiness economic conditions and developments. In addition, management’s analysis increased the unallocated portion of the adequacyALLL to a maximum of 10.0% of the ALLL. Atotal allowance. Both actions have resulted in higher credit to loan and lease losses reflectsprovisioning during the reversal of amounts previously charged to the ALLL.
2017 compared to 2016
twelve months ended December 31, 2020. FNCB recorded a provision for loan and lease losses of $0.8$1.9 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $1.1 million compared to $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $0.4 million compared to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses was due largely to a $1.3 million reduction in net charge-offs to $0.2 million in 2017, compared to $1.5 million in 2016. Net charge-offs within the commercial and industrial and commercial real estate segments decreased significantly, declining $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, comparing 2017 and 2016. Partially offsetting the decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses due to the reduction in net loans charged-off was an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses in 2017 to reflect the $39.3 million growth in total loans as compared to 2016.
2016 compared to 2015
For the year ended December 31, 2016, FNCB recorded a provision for loan and lease losses of $1.2 million compared to a credit for loan and lease losses of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The provision for loan and lease losses in 2016 was due largely to net charge-offs of $1.5 million during 2016. Net charge-offs within the commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and consumer segments were the most elevated, totaling $0.4 million, $0.6 million, and $0.4 million, respectively. The credit for loan and lease losses in 2015 was due largely to improvement in FNCB’s historical loss and certain qualitative factors and levels of classified loans. The balance of loans classified as “Substandard” decreased $8.9 million, or 34.7%, to $16.8 million at December 31, 2015 from $25.7 million at the end of 2014.2019.
Non-Interest Income
The following table presents the components of non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015:
2019:
Components of Non-Interest Income
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Deposit service charges | $ | 2,903 | $ | 2,892 | $ | 2,960 | ||||||
Net gain on the sale of securities | 1,597 | 960 | 2,296 | |||||||||
Net gain on the sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 304 | 340 | 292 | |||||||||
Net gain on the sale of SBA guaranteed loans | 79 | 51 | - | |||||||||
Net gain on the sale of other repossessed assets | 47 | - | - | |||||||||
Net gain on the sale of other real estate owned | 79 | 49 | 162 | |||||||||
Loan-related fees | 384 | 439 | 442 | |||||||||
Income from bank-owned life insurance | 527 | 552 | 564 | |||||||||
Other | 1,305 | 920 | 1,084 | |||||||||
Total non-interest income | $ | 7,225 | $ | 6,203 | $ | 7,800 | ||||||
2017 compared to 2016
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Deposit service charges | $ | 3,252 | $ | 3,035 | ||||
Net gain on the sale of available-for-sale securities | 1,528 | 1,227 | ||||||
Net gain on equity securities | 1,171 | 29 | ||||||
Net gain on the sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 653 | 253 | ||||||
Net gain on the sale of other real estate owned | - | 20 | ||||||
Loan-related fees | 348 | 378 | ||||||
Income from bank-owned life insurance | 482 | 520 | ||||||
Loan referral fees | 390 | 703 | ||||||
| Merchant services revenue | 565 | 536 | ||||||
Other | 861 | 919 | ||||||
| Total non-interest income | $ | 9,250 | $ | 7,620 | ||||
For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, non-interest income increased $1.0$1.6 million or 16.5%, to $7.2 $9.2million compared to $6.2$7.6 million for the same period of 2016.year ended December 31, 2019. The 21.4% increase was due largely to anin non-interest income primarily reflected a $1.1 million increase in net gains on the sale ofequity securities of $0.6 million, or 66.4%, coupled with an increase in other income of $0.4 million, or 41.9%. Net gains on equity securities in 2020 included a $1.1 thousand gain recognized on FNCB's investment in the salecommon stock of other real estate owned were $79 thousand in 2017, an increasea privately held bank holding company as part of $30 thousand, or 61.2%, comparedthe completion of a merger and acquisition. Also contributing to $49 thousand in 2016. Also affecting non-interest income was an increase in net gains on the salehigher level of guaranteed principal balances of loans guaranteed by the SBA of $28 thousand, or 54.9%, to $79 thousand in 2017 from $51 thousand in 2016. FNCB also recorded a net gain on the sale of other repossessed assets of $47 thousand during 2017.
Partially offsetting these increases in non-interest income were decreases of $55 thousand, or 12.5%,increases in loan-related fees, concentrated in reduced letter of credit fees, coupled with decreases of $36 thousand inthe net gains on the sale of mortgage loans and $25 thousand, or 4.5%, in income from bank-owned life insurance policies. Service charges on deposit accounts remained steady, increasing by $11 thousand, or 0.4%, in 2017 as compared to 2016.
2015 compared to 2014
Non-interest income decreased $1.6 million, or 20.5%, to $6.2 million in 2016 compared to $7.8 million in 2015. Non-interest income levels in 2016 were largely impacted by a reduction in net gains on the sale of securities of $1.3 million, or 58.2%, from $2.3 million during 2015 to $1.0 million during 2016. In addition, FNCB received non-recurring income from legal settlements of $0.2 million in 2015.
Also affecting non-interest income were reductions in deposit services charges and net gains on the sale of OREO, which were partially mitigated by increases in gains from loan sales. Deposit service charges also declined slightly by $68 thousand, or 2.3%. The sale of OREO properties generated net gains of $49 thousand in 2016, a decrease of $113 thousand, or 69.8%, from $162 thousand in 2015. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in net gainsrealized on the sale of mortgage loans held for sale of $48and available-for-sale debt securities, and an increase in deposit services charges. An increase in mortgage volume due to historically low interest rates, coupled with favorable pricing on the secondary market, led to a $400 thousand, or 16.4%158.1%, from $292 thousandincrease in 2015 to $340 thousand in 2016. Also during 2016, FNCB realized a net gain of $51 thousandgains on the sale of mortgages held for sale to $653 thousand in 2020, compared to $253 thousand in 2019. Net gains on the guaranteed principal balancesale of three loans thatavailable-for-sale debt securities increased $301 thousand, or 24.5%, to $1.5 million in 2020 from $1.2 million in 2019. With regard to deposit service charges, in the second half of 2019, FNCB engaged an independent third party to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of FNCB's non-interest income and fee structure to identify opportunities for enhancement. Recommendations to the fee structure arising from this assessment were guaranteed byfully implemented prior to the SBA. Loan-relatedbeginning of 2020. FNCB also implemented an automated, dynamic overdraft management system in 2020. As a result, deposit service charges increased, $217 thousand, or 7.1%, to $3.2 million in 2020 compared to $3.0 million in 2019. The increase primarily reflected increases in ATM surcharge fees, income from bank-owned life insurance policies,service charges on consumer and other income remained steady comparing 2016business demand deposits and 2015.overdraft-related fees.
Partially offsetting the increases to non-interest income was a $313 thousand, or 44.5%, decline in loan referral fees/interest rate swap revenue to $390 thousand in 2020 from $703 thousand in 2019. Loan referral fees include fees received from third-party counterparties related to various commercial loan interest rate swap transactions and fees received for the referral of FHA residential mortgage loans to a third-party broker. The decrease in these fees reflected a reduction in both the number and volume of such transactions in 2020 as compared to 2019.
In 2019, FNCBalso recorded a $114 thousand BOLI death benefit claim, included in other non-interest income. There were no BOLI death benefit claims in 2020.
Non-Interest Expense
The following table presents the major components of non-interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015:2019:
Components of Non-Interest Expense
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | $ | 14,161 | $ | 14,320 | $ | 13,810 | ||||||
Occupancy expense | 2,105 | 1,777 | 2,284 | |||||||||
Equipment expense | 1,815 | 1,732 | 1,657 | |||||||||
Advertising expense | 623 | 554 | 483 | |||||||||
Data processing expense | 2,023 | 1,997 | 1,976 | |||||||||
Regulatory assessments | 686 | 729 | 950 | |||||||||
Bank shares tax | 800 | 836 | 705 | |||||||||
Expense of other real estate | 488 | 409 | 400 | |||||||||
Legal expense | 128 | 362 | 437 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 956 | 961 | 1,014 | |||||||||
Insurance expense | 519 | 516 | 659 | |||||||||
Legal settlements | - | - | 777 | |||||||||
Other losses | 503 | 277 | 281 | |||||||||
Other operating expenses | 3,262 | 3,075 | 3,031 | |||||||||
Total non-interest expense | $ | 28,069 | $ | 27,545 | $ | 28,464 | ||||||
2017 compared to 2016
Non-interest expense totaled $28.0 million in 2017, an increase of $0.5 million, or 1.9%, from $27.5 million in 2016. The increase resulted primarily from increases in occupancy expense, other losses, other operating expenses, equipment expense, expenses of other real estate owned, and advertising expenses. Partially mitigating these increases were decreases in legal expense, salaries and employee benefits, regulatory expenses, and bank shares tax.
Long-term facilities planning contributed to an increase in occupancy expense of $0.3 million, or 18.5%, to $2.1 million in 2017 as compared to $1.8 million in 2016. Specifically, FNCB accelerated depreciation of certain leasehold improvements resulting from future facilities planning which contributed $0.2 million to the increase in occupancy expense over 2016, coupled with increases in rent expense and snow removal costs.
Other operating expenses increased $0.2 million, or 6.1%, to $3.3 million in 2017 from $3.1 million in 2016. The increase was attributable to increases in loan-related expenses related to a “No Closing Costs Loan Sale” for its real estate secured retail lending products launched during 2017, coupled with an increase in telecommunication expenses related to ongoing network improvement projects and an increase in the required provision for off-balance sheet commitments. FNCB also experienced an increase in other losses during 2017, due largely to losses resulting from external fraud activities and software abandonment costs. Also contributing to the increase in non-interest expenses for 2017 were increases in equipment expense of $83 thousand, expenses of other real estate owned of $79 thousand, and advertising expenses of $69 thousand.
Legal expenses continued to decline throughout 2017 as outstanding litigation was resolved. Legal expenses declined $0.2 million, or 64.6%, from $0.3 million in 2016 to $0.1 million in 2017.
FNCB experienced a decrease in salaries and employee benefit costs of $0.1 million, or 1.1%, to $14.2 million in 2017 as compared to $14.3 million in 2016. The decline was concentrated in salaries expense, resulting from a reduction in the number of full-time equivalent employees to 230 at December 31, 2017 from 236 at December 31, 2016, coupled with a reduction in severance-related costs. These decreases were partially offset by increases in health insurance premiums.
During 2016, FNCB converted from a national charter to a state charter, which contributed to the $43 thousand, or 5.9%, reduction in regulatory expenses for 2017 as compared to 2016. FNCB also experienced a reduction in bank shares tax expense of $36 thousand, or 4.3%, comparing 2017 and 2016.
2016 compared to 2015
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | $ | 15,246 | $ | 15,518 | ||||
Occupancy expense | 2,052 | 1,948 | ||||||
Equipment expense | 1,477 | 1,319 | ||||||
Advertising expense | 685 | 738 | ||||||
Data processing expense | 2,933 | 3,113 | ||||||
Bank shares tax | 786 | 566 | ||||||
Professional fees | 999 | 1,056 | ||||||
Other operating expenses | 4,737 | 5,424 | ||||||
| Total non-interest expense | $ | 28,915 | $ | 29,682 | ||||
Non-interest expense totaled $27.5 $28.9 million in 2016,2020, a decrease of $0.9 million,$767 thousand, or 3.2%2.6%, from $28.5$29.7 million in 2015.2019. Thedecrease resulted primarily from reductionsdecreases in legal settlements, occupancysalaries and employee benefits, data processing expense regulatory assessments, insurance expenses, legal expenses, and professional fees.other operating expenses. Partially offsetting these decreases were increases in salariesoccupancy costs, equipment expenses and bank shares tax.
Salaries and employee benefits bank shares tax, equipment expense and advertising expenses.
Long-term facilities planning and the relocation of one of the Bank’s corporate offices contributed to occupancy expense reductions of $0.5 million,decreased $272 thousand, or 22.2%1.75%, to $1.8$15.2 million in 2016 as compared to $2.32020 from $15.5 million in 2015. Specifically, FNCB experienced decreases in rent expense, maintenance expenses, snow removal costs, and utilities expenses.
Included in regulatory assessments expense are FDIC insurance assessments and semi-annual assessments imposed by the Bank’s primary regulator. FNCB experienced a $0.2 million, or 23.3%,2019. The reduction in regulatory assessment expense comparing 2016 and 2015. The decrease largely reflected the Bank’s conversion from a national charter to a state charter and continued improvement in the Bank’s risk profile. The change in charter resulted in a reduction in semi-annual regulatory assessments of $150 thousand, or 53.4%, to $131 thousand in 2016 from $281 thousand in 2015. In addition, during the second quarter of 2015, FNCB was notified by the FDIC that the Bank’s risk category for FDIC assessments had improved to a risk category I, the lowest risk category from risk category II based upon the results of its most recent regulatory examination. The change in risk categories became effective on February 1, 2015, and as a result the Bank’s initial base assessment rate for deposit insurance decreased from 0.14 basis points to a range of 0.05 – 0.09 basis points. FNCB was able to realize a full-year of lower assessment rates in 2016, which resulted in a $71 thousand, or 10.6%, reduction in FDIC assessments comparing 2016 and 2015. Moreover, FNCB’s improved risk profile contributed to a $0.1 million, or 21.7%, reduction in insurance expenses.
Legal and professional fee expenses continued to decline throughout 2016 as outstanding litigation was resolved and reliance on outside consulting firms declined. Legal expenses declined $75 thousand, or 17.2%, as compared to 2015, while professional fees decreased $53 thousand, or 5.2%.
FNCB experienced an increase in salaries and employee benefit costs of $0.5 million, or 3.7%, to $14.3 million in 2016 as compared to $13.8 million in 2015. Despite a reduction in the number of full-time equivalent employees to 236 at December 31, 2016 from 250 at December 31, 2015, total salary expense increased $245 thousand, or 2.1%, due to annual merit increases and severance-related costs. Payroll taxes and employee benefits increased $265 thousand, or 11.1%, which largely reflected higher health insurance premiums and an increase in the state unemployment compensation rate.
On October 1, 2015, the Bank executed a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for a select group of management or highly compensated employees within the meaning of Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3) and 401(a)(1) of The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The general provisions of the SERP provide for annual year-end contributions, performance contingent contributions and discretionary contributions. The SERP contributions are unfunded for federal tax purposes and constitute an unsecured promise by the Bank to pay benefits in the future. Participants in the SERP shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Bank. Annual accrued unfunded contributions included in salaries and employee benefits expense totaled $147was largely due to an increase in payroll-related costs that were deferred and amortized over the life of the loan under ASC 310-20, which primarily reflected the 1,002 PPP loans originated in 2020. Also impacting the decrease in salaries and employee benefits was a 7.5-person reduction in full-time equivalent employees, due primarily to COVID-19 limitations on branch operations. As a result, salary costs decreased $320 thousand, or 2.7%, to $11.7 million in 2020 from $12.0 million in 2019, and payroll taxes decreased $56 thousand, or 5.8%, to $906 thousand in 2016 and $1302020 from $962 thousand in 2015.2019. Partially offsetting these factors were increases in employee incentive costs of $142 thousand, or 20.3%, health insurance expense of $121 thousand, or 10.1%, and retirement costs of $95 thousand, or 19.8%. At the end of 2020, the Board of Directors approved a special one-time bonus to each employee to convey appreciation during this unprecedented time, which included payments of $500 and $250 for each full-time and part-time employee, respectively. The total cost of this one-time incentive payment was $101 thousand, which accounted for the majority of the increase in incentive costs. In the fourth quarter of 2019, FNCB began self-insuring employee healthcare benefits through a consortium. The increase in health insurance expense reflected first year costs and timing differences of benefit billing and payments associated with the transition. The higher amount of retirement costs was due to increases in supplemental employee retirement plan ("SERP") contributions and changes in FNCB's 401(k) plan including, an increase to the percentage for employer match and institution of an auto-enrollment feature upon hire.
Other operating expenses decreased $687 thousand, or 12.7%, to $4.7 million in 2020 from $5.4 million in 2019. The decrease was predominately due to a $538 thousand favorable swing in the provision for off-balance sheet commitments due to lower commitment volumes. FNCB recorded a credit for off-balance sheet commitments of $90 thousand in 2020 compared to a provision of $448 thousand in 2019.
Occupancy costs increased $104 thousand, or 5.4%, to $2.0 million in 2020 from $1.9 million in 2019, while equipment expenses increased $158 thousand, or 11.9%, to $1.5 million in 2020, compared to $1.3 million in 2019, reflecting a full-year of depreciation expense for premises and furniture and equipment related to the new offices opened in mid-2019. In addition, COVID-19 related expenses such as the cleaning and sanitization of branch and administrative offices, the installation of health and safety equipment including hand sanitizing stations and plexiglass partitions, computer-related expenses to enable a remote work environment also factored into the increase in occupancy and equipment expense.
Bank shares tax also increased in 2020, to $786 thousand, up $220 thousand from $566 thousand recorded at December 31, 2019, which reflected an increase in capital at the Bank level.
Provision for Income Taxes
FNCB recorded income tax expense of $11.3$3.2 million in 2017,2020, an increase of $9.5 million as$899 thousand, or 38.6%, compared to $1.7$2.3 million in 2016.2019. The increase in income tax expense was due largely to a non-recurring revaluation of deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, resultinghigher taxable income in a decrease in net deferred tax assets and a corresponding increase in income tax expense of $8.0 million during 2017, coupled with higher pre-tax income. The revaluation of FNCB’s deferred tax assets resulted from the reduction in the statutory corporate tax rate from a maximum federal corporate income tax rate of 35%2020 as compared to 21%, under the Tax Act signed into law on December 22, 2017. FNCB recorded a benefit for income taxes during 2015 of $27.8 million, resulting primarily from the reversal of a previously established valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.2019.
Management evaluates the carrying amount of its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis, or more frequently, ifas necessary, in accordance with guidance set forth in ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” and applies the criteria in the guidance to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized within its life cycle, based on the weight of available evidence. If management determines based on available evidence, both positive and negative, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized in future periods, a valuation allowance is calculated and recorded. These determinations are inherently subjective and depend upon management’s estimates and judgments used in their evaluation of both positive and negative evidence.
In evaluating available evidence, management considers, among other factors, historical financial performance, expectation of future earnings, the ability to carry back losses to recoup taxes previously paid, length of statutory carry forward periods, experience with operating loss and tax credit carry forwards not expiring unused, tax planning strategies and timing of reversals of temporary differences. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management carefully weighs both positive and negative evidence currently available.
The decrease in the federal corporate income tax rate to 21.0% under the Tax Act became effective on January 1, 2018. Management anticipates a reduction in income tax expense going forward due to the reduction in corporate tax rate.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets were $1.162$1.466 billion at December 31, 2017, a decrease2020, an increase of $33.3$262.1 million, or 2.8%21.8%, from $1.196$1.204 billion at December 31, 2016.2019. The decreaseincrease in total assets was led by a reduction in cash and cash equivalents, as cash was used to fund growthresulted from the increase in interest-earning assets, specifically an increase in available-for-sale debt securitiesof $77.2 million, or 28.3%, to $350.0million at December 31, 2020 from $272.8 million at December 31, 2019. Loans, net of the allowance for loan and pay down borrowings, coupled with a reduction in interest-bearing deposits. Loans,lease losses, also increased by $69.6 million, or 8.5%, to $889.2 million at December 31, 2020 from $819.5 million at December 31, 2019. The increase was largely due to the origination of PPP loans, of which $76.0 million, net of net deferred loan costsorigination fees, were outstanding at December 31, 2020. Cash and unearned income grew $39.4cash equivalents increased $121.2 million, or 5.4%,350.8% to $770.6$155.8 million at December 31, 20172020 from $731.3$34.6 million at December 31, 2016. Securities available for sale2019. Total deposits increased $14.4$285.7 million, or 5.2%28.5%, to $290.4$1.287 billion at December 31, 2020 from $1.002 billion at December 31, 2019. The increase in deposits was primarily attributable to increases in both interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing deposits. Total borrowed funds decreased $46.9 million, or 82.0% to $10.3 million at December 31, 20172020 from $276.0$57.2 million at December 31, 2019. FNCB had no term or overnight borrowings through the endFHLB of 2016. Total deposits decreased $12.7 million, or 1.3%, and borrowed funds declined $18.6 million, or 23.6%.Pittsburgh outstanding as of December 31, 2020.
Total shareholders’ equity declined $1.2increased $22.3 million, or 1.3%16.7%, to $89.2$155.9 million at December 31, 20172020 from $90.4$133.6 million at the endDecember 31, 2019. The increase wasdue tonet income in 2020 of 2016. Dividends declared during 2017 of $2.2$15.3 million and ana $10.8 million increase in the accumulated other comprehensive lossincome related to appreciation in the fair value of $0.2 million were the primary factors causing the reduction in capital,available-for-sale debt securities, net of deferred taxes, partially offset by common shares issued through the dividend reinvestment and optional cash purchase plansyear-to-date dividends declared of $0.4 million, stock-based compensation of $0.3 million and net income of $0.1$4.4 million. Dividends declared and paid by FNCB on its common stock totaled $0.13$0.22 per share during 2017.in 2020, an increase of $0.02 per share, or 10.0%, compared to $0.20 per share in 2019. On January 31, 2018,27, 2021, the Board of Directors of FNCB declared a $0.04$0.06 per share dividend for the first quarter of 2018,2021, which was a 9.1% increase compared to the $0.055 per share dividend declared for the first quarter of 2020. The first quarter 2021 dividend is payable on March 15, 20182021 to shareholders of record on March 1 2018., 2021.
Securities
FNCB’s investment securities portfolio provides a source of liquidity needed to meet expected loan demand and interest income to increase profitability. Additionally, the investment securities portfolio is used to meet pledging requirements to secure public deposits and for other purposes. Management classifies investmentDebt securities are classified as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale at the time of purchase based on itsmanagement's intent. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost, while available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a component of shareholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, all debt securities were classified as available-for-sale. Equity securities with readily determinable fair values are carried at fair value, with gains and losses due to fluctuations in market value included in the consolidated statements of income. Securities with limited marketability and/or restrictions, such as FHLB of Pittsburgh stock, are carried at cost. Decisions to purchase or sell investment securities are based upon management’s current assessment of long- and short-term economic and financial conditions, including the interest rate environment and asset/liability management, liquidity and tax-planning strategies. Securities with limited marketability and/or restrictions, such as FHLB
At December 31, 2017, FNCB’s2020, the investment portfolio was comprised principally of fixed-rate securities issued by U.S. government or U.S. government-sponsored agencies, which include mortgage-backed securities and residential and commercial CMOs, fixed-rate taxable and tax-free obligations of state and political subdivisions, private CMOs and corporate debt securities. Except for U.S. government and government-sponsored agencies, there were no securities of any individual issuer that exceeded 10.0% of shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Because of theThe investment portfolio is predominantly fixed-rate nature of the portfolio, FNCB’s in nature. As such, FNCB's debt securities are inherently subject to interest rate risk, defined as the risk that an investment’s value will change due to a change in interest rates, in the spread between two rates and in the shape of the yield curve. A security’s value is usually affected inversely by changes in rates. U.S. Treasury rates fell significantly in the first quarter of 2020 in response to near-historical lows mid-2016 following the United Kingdom’s referendum to exit the European Union. During 2017, short-termoutbreak of COVID-19, declaration of a national emergency and economic shutdown in March 2020. U.S. Treasury rates rose steadily due to a more expansionary fiscal and monetary policy. However,fluctuated slightly but hovered near historic lows for the remainder of 2020. Conversely, spreads between short- and long-term rates narrowed causingwidened from the narrow margins exhibited in 2019, adding some minor slope to the yield curve to flatten. The 2-year Treasury rate, which was 1.19% at December 31, 2016, rose 18 basis points to 1.38% at June 30, 2017 and then climbed 51 basis points to 1.89% at December 31, 2017. Conversely,curve. Specifically, the 10-year Treasury rate, which was 2.45% at December 31, 2016, fell 14 basis points to 2.31% at June 30, 2017 before rebounding 9 basis points to close 2017 5basis points lower than at close of 2016. The spread between the 2-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury rate, compressed 75 basis points from 126 basis pointswhich was 0.34% at December 31, 20162019 widened 46 basis points to 51 basis points0.80% at December 31, 2017.2020. The 2-year Treasury rate, which was 1.58% at December 31, 2019, fell 135 basis points to 0.23% at March 31, 2020 and decreased another 10 basis points to 0.13% at December 31, 2020. Meanwhile, the 10-year Treasury rate, which was 1.92% at December 31, 2019, dropped 122 basis points to 0.70% at March 31, 2020, but rebounded 23 basis points to 0.93% at December 31, 2020. Due to the decrease in rates comparing December 31, 2020 and 2019, FNCB experienced significant appreciation in the fair value of its investment portfolio. FNCB reported a net unrealized holding lossgain on its investment portfolio of $1.7$14.0 million, net of income taxes of $464 thousand, $3.7 millionat December 31, 2017, 2020,compared to ana $3.1 million net unrealized holding loss of $1.6 million,gain, net of income taxes of $0.8 million, at December 31, 2016. Any additional increases2019. However, any further increase in interest rates could result in further depreciation in the fair value of FNCB’s securities portfolio and capital position.
The following table presents the carrying value of available-for-sale debt securities which are carriedand equity securities with readily determinable fair values at fair value at December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
Composition of the Investment Portfolio
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | $ | - | $ | 12,188 | $ | 44,043 | ||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 145,999 | 117,873 | 75,407 | $ | 205,828 | $ | 117,763 | $ | 152,187 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | 35,657 | 18,084 | 22,269 | 56,972 | 80,294 | 34,207 | ||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | 75,418 | 99,350 | 89,423 | 3,904 | 17,723 | 73,640 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 22,311 | 20,576 | 18,098 | 13,026 | 18,485 | 23,934 | ||||||||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | 38,199 | 25,075 | 2,913 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 4,058 | 3,792 | 3,692 | 24,580 | 7,182 | 4,936 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 3,086 | - | - | 7,526 | 5,621 | 1,802 | ||||||||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | 2,930 | 3,216 | 3,162 | - | 696 | 2,413 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 928 | 936 | 948 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 290,387 | $ | 276,015 | $ | 257,042 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale debt securities | $ | 350,035 | $ | 272,839 | $ | 296,032 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities, at fair value | $ | 3,026 | $ | 920 | $ | 891 | ||||||||||||||||||
Management monitors the investment portfolio regularly and adjusts the investment strategy to reflect changes in liquidity needs, asset/liability strategy and tax-planning requirements. FNCB currently has $40.5The composition of FNCB's investment portfolio shifted in 2020, reflecting the change in its income tax position, as the majority of available NOL carryforwards were consumed in 2020. At December 31, 2020, available NOLs were approximately $2.0 million, in net operating loss (“NOL”) carryovers, which it usesa decrease of $18.7 million compared to offset any taxable income.$20.7 million outstanding at December 31, 2019. Because of thisthe change in tax position, there is no benefit from holding tax-exempt obligationsFNCB increased its holdings of state and political subdivisions. Accordingly, management’s actions during recent periods with regard to managingtax-free investments in 2020.
Management continually monitors the investment portfolio have reflected current tax-planning initiatives focused on generating sustained taxable incomefor credit worthiness, value, and yield. Each year management engages a third-party consultant to be ablereview the municipal portfolio to reduce NOL carryovers.determine if there is any undue credit risk within the portfolio. In 2020, management decided to increase the frequency of independent third-party reviews of its municipal investments from annually to semi-annually with the most recent credit review conducted as of December 31, 2020. As part of the independent review, each security is compared to their Portfolio Credit Benchmark to identify which securities may contain more than a minimal risk of payment default. As of December 31, 2020, the third-party report concluded that each security held within the portfolio met or exceeded the benchmark and that none of the securities required further review. The next third-party review is scheduled for June 30, 2021. Management also monitors municipal securities monthly using a third-party Municipal Surveillance Report.
FNCB’s investment strategy involved sellingMarket conditions in 2020 allowed management to sell lower-yielding securities of U.S. governmentat a gain and government-sponsored agencies and reinvestingreinvest a portion of the proceeds from the sales, as well as normal monthly cash flows from the portfolio, into higher-yielding taxable obligations of state and political subdivisions and multi-family mortgage-backedhigher yielding securities and CMOs of U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies. During 2017, managementwithin FNCB's risk tolerance. FNCB sold 38 available-for-sale securities in 2020 with an aggregate amortized cost of $130.6 million and a weighted-average yield of 2.40%.$66.7 million. Gross proceeds received on the sales totaled $132.2$68.2 million, with net gains of $1.6$1.5 million realized upon the sales and included in non-interest income. The securities sold had a weighted-average yield of 1.63%.
Securities purchased during the year ended December 31, 20172020 totaled $154.7$152.7 million, including $100.8$72.9 million in tax-free obligations of state and political subdivisions, $22.8 million in taxable obligations of state and political subdivisions, $19.8 million in private CMOs, $17.8 million in corporate debt securities, $12.1 million in CMOs of U.S. government-sponsored agencies $39.7and $7.3 million in obligations of state and political subdivisions, $8.2 million in mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government-sponsored agencies, $4.0 million in asset-backed securities and $2.0 million in corporate debt securities. Securities purchased during 20172020 had a weighted-average yield of 2.76%2.58%.
The following table presents the maturities of available-for-sale debt securities, based on carrying value at December 31, 2017,2020, and the weighted average yields of such securities calculated on the basis of the amortized cost and effective yields weighted for the scheduled maturity of each security. The yields on tax-exempt obligations of states and political subdivisions are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using FNCB’s historic effectivethe federal corporate income tax rate of 34.0%21.0%. Because residential, commercial and commercialprivate collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities are not due at a single maturity date, they are not included in the maturity categories in the following summary.
Maturity Distribution of the Investment Portfolio
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Within One Year | > 1 – 5 Years | 6 - 10 Years | Over 10 Years | Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities | No Fixed Maturity | Total | Within One Year | > 1 – 5 Years | 6-10 Years | Over 10 Years | Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities | No Fixed Maturity | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | - | 36,515 | 109,484 | - | - | - | 145,999 | $ | 4,718 | $ | 65,429 | $ | 23,821 | $ | 111,860 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 205,828 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | 2.49 | % | 2.84 | % | 2.75 | % | 2.42 | % | 2.95 | % | 2.92 | % | 2.85 | % | 2.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | - | - | - | - | 35,657 | - | 35,657 | - | - | - | - | 56,972 | - | 56,972 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | 2.77 | % | 2.77 | % | 2.75 | % | 2.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | - | - | - | - | 75,418 | - | 75,418 | - | - | - | - | 3,904 | - | 3,904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | 2.50 | % | 2.50 | % | 1.98 | % | 1.98 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | - | - | - | - | 22,311 | - | 22,311 | - | - | - | - | 13,026 | - | 13,026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | 2.88 | % | 2.88 | % | 3.17 | % | 3.17 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | - | - | - | - | 38,199 | - | 38,199 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | 2.53 | % | 2.53 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | - | - | 4,058 | - | - | - | 4,058 | - | 1,004 | 23,576 | - | - | - | 24,580 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | 6.63 | % | 6.63 | % | 6.50 | % | 5.12 | % | 5.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | - | - | - | - | 3,086 | - | 3,086 | - | - | - | - | 7,526 | - | 7,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | 2.46 | % | 2.46 | % | 1.57 | % | 1.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | 496 | 2,434 | - | - | - | - | 2,930 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | 1.85 | % | 2.14 | % | 2.09 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | - | - | - | - | - | 928 | 928 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yield | 3.45 | % | 3.45 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 496 | $ | 38,949 | $ | 113,542 | $ | - | $ | 136,472 | $ | 928 | $ | 290,387 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale maturities | $ | 4,718 | $ | 66,433 | $ | 47,397 | $ | 111,860 | $ | 119,627 | $ | - | $ | 350,035 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average yield | 1.85 | % | 2.47 | % | 2.97 | % | 0.00 | % | 2.63 | % | 3.45 | % | 2.75 | % | 2.42 | % | 3.00 | % | 4.02 | % | 2.85 | % | 2.63 | % | - | % | 2.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OTTI Evaluation
There was no OTTI recognized during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015.2019. For additional information regarding management’s evaluation of securities for OTTI, see Note 4, “Securities” of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial StatementStatements and Supplementary Data” ofto this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh stock has limited marketability and is carried at cost. FNCB’s investment in FHLB of Pittsburgh stock totaled $2.8 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Management noted no indicators of impairment for the FHLB of Pittsburgh or Atlantic Community Bankers Bank stock at December 31, 2017. During the year ended2020, 2019 and 2018.
Equity Securities and Equity Securities without Readily Determinable Fair Value
At December 31, 2016, the Bank canceled its membership with the Federal Reserve Bank2019, FNCB owned 201,000 shares of Philadelphia (“FRB”), and as a result, the entire balance of FRB stock totaling $1.3 million was redeemed.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, FNCB purchased $1.7 million, representing a 4.9% interest, in the common stock of a privately-held bank holding company. The common stock was purchased during 2017 for $8.25 per share, or $1.7 million in aggregate, as part of a private placement pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended for offerings not involving any public offering. The common stock isof this bank holding company was not currently traded on any established market, and is not expected to be traded in the near future on any securities exchange or established over-the-counter market. FNCB has elected to accounthad accounted for this transaction as an investment in an equity security without a readily determinable fair value. AnThe $1.7 million investment was included in other assets at December 31, 2019.
On December 29, 2020, FNCB purchased 20,000 shares of the fixed-rate, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock of a privately-held bank holding company at an offering price of $25.00 per share or $500 thousand in aggregate, which is included in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The preferred stock pays quarterly dividends at an annual rate of 8.25%, commencing March 30, 2021. The preferred stock of this bank holding company is not traded on any established market and is accounted for as an equity security without a determinable fair value. Under GAAP, an equity security without a readily determinable fair value shall be written down to its fair value if a qualitative assessment indicates that the investment is impaired, and the fair value of the investment is less than its carrying value. The $1.7 million investment is included in other assets in the consolidated statementsAs part of financial condition at December 31, 2017. Managementits qualitative assessment, management engaged an independent third party toof provide a valuation of this investment as of December 31, 2017. The valuation2020, which indicated that the investment was not impaired and accordingly,impaired. Management determined that no adjustment for impairment was required at December 31, 2017.2020.
Loans
FNCB experienced strong demand for its lending products throughout 2017, resulting in an increase in totalTotal loans, of $39.3 gross increased by $76.9million, or 5.4%9.3%, to $768.1$903.3 million at December 31, 20172020 from $728.8$826.4 million at December 31, 2016.2019. The most prominent growthincrease in loan balances was exhibited inlargely due to the origination of PPP loans. Gross PPP loans outstanding at December 31, 2020 were $78.6 million. Additionally, FNCB experienced moderate demand for residential real estate loans, construction, land acquisition and development loans, commercial and industrial loans and loans to state and political subdivisions, while commercial real estate lending categories, which together contributed $31.7 million to the growth in total loans. During 2017, FNCB launched a “No Closing Cost Loan Sale” for its real estate secured lending products, which waived closing costs for qualified loan customers. In addition, the introduction of the Loan Production Office in Allentown, Lehigh County, coupled with adding experienced commercial lenders to the lending team, contributed to the strong growth in commercial real estate loans. FNCB also experienced growth in the consumer lending segment, resulting from the purchase of a pool of refinanced student loans and continued growth in its indirect lending portfolio.consumer loans contracted, comparing December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Historically, commercial lending activities have represented a significant portion of FNCB’s loan portfolio. Commercial lending includes commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans and construction, land acquisition and development loans, and represented 56.4%63.3% and 56.6%57.3% of total loans at December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2016,2019, respectively. The increase in commercial lending was largely due to increases in commercial and industrial loans, specifically PPP loans, and construction, land acquisition and development loans. Excluding PPP loans, commercial lending represented 59.8% of total loans at December 31, 2020.
From a collateral standpoint, a majority of FNCB’s loan portfolio consists of loans secured by real estate. Real estate secured loans, which include commercial real estate, construction, land acquisition and development, and residential real estate loans and home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”), increased by $32.1$16.2 million, or 7.5%3.2%, to $462.2$530.0 million at December 31, 20172020 from $430.1$513.8 million at December 31, 2016.2019. The increase was primarily attributable to both the residentialstrong demand for commercial construction loans, as construction, land acquisition and commercial real estate segments, as detailed above.development loans increased $12.3 million, or 25.9%, to $59.8 million at December 31, 2020 from $47.5 million at December 31, 2019. Real estate secured loans represented 60.2%as a percentage of total gross loans decreased to 58.7% at December 31, 2020 from 62.2% at December 31, 2019. Excluding PPP loans, real estate secured loans as a percentage of total gross loans at December 31, 2017 and 59.0% at December 31, 2016.2020 was 64.3%.
Commercial and industrial loans decreased $0.7increased $90.8 million, or 0.4%61.5%, during the year to $150.1$238.4 million at December 31, 20172020 from $150.8$147.6 million at December 31, 2016.2019. Commercial and industrial loans consist primarily of equipment loans, working capital financing, revolving lines of credit and loans secured by cash and marketable securities.securities and PPP loans. Excluding PPP loans, commercial and industrial loans increased $12.2 million or 8.3%. Loans secured by commercial real estate increased $18.0decreased $4.5 million, or 7.4%1.6%, to $261.8$273.9 millionat December 31, 2020 from $278.4 million at December 31, 2017 from $243.8 million at December 31, 2016.2019. Commercial real estate loans include long-term commercial mortgage financing and are primarily secured by first or second lien mortgages. Additionally, construction, land acquisition and development loans increased $2.6 million, or 14.3%, during the year to $21.0 million at December 31, 2017, from $18.4 million at December 31, 2016.
Residential real estate loans totaled $158.0 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of $13.7 million, or 9.5%, from $144.3 million at December 31, 2016. The No Closing Costs Loan Sale, mentioned above, contributed to the increase, specifically concentrated in home equity term loans, which grew $8.1 million, or 40.1%, to $28.4 million at December 31, 2017 as compared to $20.3 million at December 31, 2016. The components of residential real estate loans include fixed-rate and variable-rate mortgage loans. HELOCs are not included in this category but are included in consumer loans. FNCB primarily underwrites fixed-rate purchase and refinance of residential mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market to reduce interest rate risk and provide funding for additional loans. Additionally, FNCB offers a “WOW” mortgage product, which is a non-saleable mortgage with maturity terms of 7.5 to 14.519.5 years, and offers customers an attractive fixed interest rate, low closing costs and a guaranteed 30-day close. “WOW’ mortgages increased $2.2 million, or 5.1%,FNCB also offers home equity loans and home equity lines of credit ("HELOC") with a maximum combined loan-to value ratio of 90% based on the appraised value of the property. Home equity loans have fixed rates of interest and carry terms up to $44.715 years, while HELOCs are variable-rate loans. Residential real estate loans totaled $196.3 million at December 31, 20172020, an increase of $8.4 million, or 4.5%, from $42.5$187.9 million at December 31, 2016.2019. In 2020, FNCB experienced strong demand for its proprietary WOW mortgage product, which increased $21.9 million, or 42.9%, to $72.9 million at December 31, 2020 from $51.0 million at December 31, 2019. Partially offsetting this increase were reductions in traditional 1-4 family mortgages, home equity loans and HELOCs.
Consumer loans totaled $134.7$85.9 million at December 31, 2017, an increase2020, a decrease of $6.9$35.2 million, or 5.3%29.1%, from $127.8$121.1 million at December 31, 2016. Indirect2019. The majority of the decrease was concentrated within the indirect auto loan portfolio, as FNCB did not aggressively compete for these loans increased $4.9 million, or 4.8%, to $106.8 million at December 31, 2017 from $101.9 million at December 31, 2016. In addition, as previously mentioned FNCB purchased a pool of refinanced student loans of $5.0 million during 2017. This pool had an outstanding balance at December 31, 2017 of $3.8 million. FNCB does not provide servicing for the purchased pool of refinanced student loans.in 2020. Loans to state and municipal governments decreased $1.2increased $5.1 million, or 2.7%11.6%, to $42.5$49.0 million at December 31, 20172020 from $43.7$43.9 million at December 31, 2016.2019.
The following table presents loans receivable, net by major category at December 31, for each of the lastfive years:
Loan Portfolio Detail | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 158,020 | $ | 144,260 | $ | 130,696 | $ | 122,832 | $ | 114,925 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 261,783 | 243,830 | 245,198 | 233,473 | 218,524 | |||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 20,981 | 18,357 | 30,843 | 18,835 | 24,382 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 150,103 | 150,758 | 146,826 | 131,057 | 126,021 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | 134,653 | 127,844 | 128,533 | 122,092 | 118,645 | |||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 42,529 | 43,709 | 46,056 | 40,205 | 39,875 | |||||||||||||||
Total loans, gross | 768,069 | 728,758 | 728,152 | 668,494 | 642,372 | |||||||||||||||
Unearned income | (80 | ) | (48 | ) | (98 | ) | (98 | ) | (143 | ) | ||||||||||
Net deferred loan costs | 2,654 | 2,569 | 2,662 | 871 | 668 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses | (9,034 | ) | (8,419 | ) | (8,790 | ) | (11,520 | ) | (14,017 | ) | ||||||||||
Loans, net | $ | 761,609 | $ | 722,860 | $ | 721,926 | $ | 657,747 | $ | 628,880 | ||||||||||
Loan Portfolio Detail
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 196,328 | $ | 187,863 | $ | 184,531 | $ | 179,439 | $ | 167,906 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 273,903 | 278,379 | 262,778 | 261,783 | 243,830 | |||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 59,785 | 47,484 | 20,813 | 20,981 | 18,357 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 238,435 | 147,623 | 150,962 | 150,103 | 150,758 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | 85,881 | 121,099 | 157,086 | 113,234 | 104,198 | |||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 49,009 | 43,908 | 59,037 | 42,529 | 43,709 | |||||||||||||||
Total loans, gross | 903,341 | 826,356 | 835,207 | 768,069 | 728,758 | |||||||||||||||
Unearned income | (110 | ) | (69 | ) | (70 | ) | (80 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||||||||
Net deferred loan (fees) costs | (2,129 | ) | 2,192 | 3,963 | 2,654 | 2,569 | ||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses | (11,950 | ) | (8,950 | ) | (9,519 | ) | (9,034 | ) | (8,419 | ) | ||||||||||
Loans, net | $ | 889,152 | $ | 819,529 | $ | 829,581 | $ | 761,609 | $ | 722,860 | ||||||||||
The following table presents the maturity distribution and interest rate information of the loan portfolio by major category as of December 31, 2017:2020:
Maturity Distribution of the Loan Portfolio
December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | Within One | One to Five | Over Five | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Within One Year | One to Five Years | Over Five Years | Total | Year | Years | Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 1,068 | $ | 6,977 | $ | 149,975 | $ | 158,020 | $ | 6,941 | $ | 14,018 | $ | 175,369 | $ | 196,328 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 32,305 | 30,664 | 198,814 | 261,783 | 6,844 | 53,756 | 213,303 | 273,903 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 9,868 | 989 | 10,124 | 20,981 | 6,378 | 17,168 | 36,239 | 59,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 83,970 | 46,232 | 19,901 | 150,103 | 69,098 | 145,835 | 23,502 | 238,435 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 5,854 | 71,009 | 57,790 | 134,653 | 1,980 | 78,280 | 5,621 | 85,881 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 239 | 13,218 | 29,072 | 42,529 | 776 | 3,681 | 44,552 | 49,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans, gross | $ | 133,304 | $ | 169,089 | $ | 465,676 | $ | 768,069 | $ | 92,017 | $ | 312,738 | $ | 498,586 | $ | 903,341 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans with predetermined interest rates | $ | 20,397 | $ | 144,531 | $ | 193,137 | $ | 358,065 | $ | 15,859 | $ | 259,444 | $ | 174,935 | $ | 450,238 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans with floating rates | 112,907 | 24,558 | 272,539 | 410,004 | 76,158 | 53,294 | 323,651 | 453,103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans, gross | $ | 133,304 | $ | 169,089 | $ | 465,676 | $ | 768,069 | $ | 92,017 | $ | 312,738 | $ | 498,586 | $ | 903,341 | ||||||||||||||||
Under industry regulations, a concentration is considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to a multiple number of borrowers engaged in similar activities which would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. Typically, industry guidelines require disclosure of concentrations of loans exceeding 10.0% of total loans outstanding. FNCB had no such concentrations at December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015.2019. In addition to industry guidelines, FNCB’s internal policy considers a concentration to exist in its loan portfolio if an aggregate loan balance outstanding to borrowers within a specific industry exceeds 25.0% of capital. However, management regularly reviews loans byin all industry categories to determine if a potential concentration exists.
The following table presents loans by industry, the percentage to gross loans and indicates concentrations greater than 25.0%25% of capital at December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015:2019:
Loan Concentrations | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | % of Gross Loans | Amount | % of Gross Loans | Amount | % of Gross Loans | ||||||||||||||||||
Retail space/shopping centers | $ | 44,184 | 5.75 | % | $ | 38,573 | 5.27 | % | $ | 35,292 | 4.83 | % | ||||||||||||
1-4 family residential investment properties | 33,275 | 4.33 | % | 24,413 | 3.34 | % | 18,957 | 2.59 | % | |||||||||||||||
Automobile dealers | 22,792 | 2.97 | % | 31,989 | 4.37 | % | 34,594 | 4.73 | % | |||||||||||||||
Loan Concentrations
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
% of Gross | % of Gross | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Loans | Amount | Loans | ||||||||||||
Retail space/shopping centers | $ | 43,926 | 4.86 | % | $ | 43,865 | 5.31 | % | ||||||||
1-4 family residential investment properties | 58,114 | 6.43 | % | 38,122 | 4.61 | % | ||||||||||
Asset Quality
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at the amount of unpaid principal, net of unearned interest, deferred loan fees and costs, and reduced by the ALLL. The ALLL is established through a provision for loan and lease losses charged to earnings.
FNCB has established and consistently applies loan policies and procedures designed to foster sound underwriting and credit monitoring practices. Credit risk is managed through the efforts of loan officers, the Chief Credit Officer, the loan review function, and the Credit Risk Management and the ALLL committees, as well as oversight from the Board of Directors.Directors, including the Director's Loan Committee. Management continually evaluates its credit risk management practices to ensure it is reacting to problems in the loan portfolio are addressed in a timely manner, although, as is the case with any financial institution, a certain degree of credit risk is dependent in part on local and general economic conditions that are beyond management’s control.
Under FNCB’s risk rating system, loans that are rated pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful, or loss are reviewed regularly as part of the risk management practices. The Credit Risk Management Committee, which consists of key members of management from the finance, legal, retail lending and credit administration units, meets monthly or more often as necessary to review individual problem credits and workout strategies and provides monthly reports to the Director's Loan Committee and full Board of Directors.
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that FNCB will be unable to collect all amounts due (including principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the note and loan agreement. For purposes of the analysis, all TDRs, loan relationships with an aggregate outstanding balance greater than $100 thousand rated substandard and non-accrual, and loans that are identified as doubtful or loss are considered impaired. Impaired loans are analyzed individually to determine the amount of impairment. For collateral-dependent loans, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral supporting the loans. A loan is determined to be collateral dependent when repayment of the loan is expected to be provided through the operation or liquidation of the collateral held. For impaired loans that are secured by real estate, management obtains external appraisals are obtained annually, or more frequently as warranted, to ascertain a fair value so that the impairment analysis can be updated. Should a current appraisal not be available at the time of impairment analysis, management may use other valuations sources, of valuation may be used, including current letters of intent, broker price opinions or executed agreements of sale. For non-collateral-dependent loans, impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, net of any deferred fees and costs, discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate.
Loans to borrowers that are experiencing financial difficulty that are modified and result in the granting of concessions to the borrowers are classified as TDRs and are considered to be impaired. Such concessions generally involve an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date, a reduction of the stated interest rate, payment modifications, capitalization of property taxes with respect to mortgage loans or a combination of these modifications. Non-accrual TDRs are returned to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are brought current, are performing under the modified terms for six consecutive months, and management believes that collection of the remaining interest and principal is probable.
Non-performing loans are monitored on an ongoing basis as part of FNCB’s loan review process. Additionally, work-out for non-performing loans and OREO are actively monitored through the Credit Risk Management Committee. A potential loss on a non-performing asset is generally determined by comparing the outstanding loan balance to the fair market value of the pledged collateral, less estimated cost to sell.
Loans are placed on non-accrual when a loan is specifically determined to be impaired or when management believes that the collection of interest or principal is doubtful. This generally occurs when a default of interest or principal has existed for 90 days or more, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection, or when management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that the loan would default before 90 days. FNCB determines delinquency status based on the number of days since the date of the borrower’s last required contractual loan payment. When the interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid interest income is reversed and charged back against current earnings. Any subsequent cash payments received are applied, first to the outstanding loan amounts, then to the recovery of any charged-off loan amounts, with any excess treated as a recovery of lost interest. A non-accrual loan is returned to accrual status when the loan is current as to principal and interest payments, is performing according to contractual terms for six consecutive months and future payments are reasonably assured.
Management actively manages impaired loans in an effort to mitigate loss to FNCB by working with customers to develop strategies to resolve borrower difficulties, through sale or liquidation of collateral, foreclosure, and other appropriate means. In addition, management monitors employment and economic conditions within FNCB’s market area, as weakening of conditions could result in real estate devaluations and an increase in loan delinquencies, which could negatively impact asset quality and cause an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses. While lagging the state and national unemployment rate, employmentEmployment conditions in FNCB’s market area improvedworsened in 20172020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Unemployment rates across the United States and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania spiked soon after the national emergency was declared, and non-essential businesses were required to shutdown or required to operate under capacity limitations. At December 31, 2019 (prior to COVID-19) the seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate for the United States, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton Pennsylvania metropolitan statistical area ("MSA") were 3.6%, 4.6% and 6.0%, respectively. For April 2020, amid the closure of non-essential businesses, the unemployment rate for the entire United States jumped to 14.8%. Similarly, the unemployment rates for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton Pennsylvania MSA rose to 16.1% and 18.4%, respectively in April 2020. However, later in the year unemployment rates, although still elevated in comparison to year-end 2016. TheDecember 31, 2019, returned to more normal levels as restrictions were eased. For December 2020, the unemployment rates for both the United States and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania were 6.7%, while the unemployment rate for the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre/Hazleton Pennsylvania metropolitan area declinedMSA was 7.9%. Management will continue to 5.6% for December 2017 from 6.0% for December 2016. The unemployment rate for our market area was aboveevaluate the rate foreffects of the Commonwealthpandemic as they unfold and proactively address any potential impact to the credit quality of Pennsylvania of 4.7% and the rate for the United States of 4.1% for December 2017.FNCB's loan portfolio.
Under the fair value of collateral method, the impaired amount of the loan is deemed to be the difference between the loan amount and the fair value of the collateral, less the estimated costs to sell. For real estate secured loans, management generally estimates selling costs using a factor of 10%, which is based on typical cost factors, such as a 6% broker commission, 1% transfer taxes, and 3% various other miscellaneous costs associated with the sales process. If the valuation indicates that the fair value has deteriorated below the carrying value of the loan, the difference between the fair value and the principal balance is either charged off.off or a specific reserve is established. For impaired loans for which the value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell exceeds the loan value, the impairment is determined to be zero.
The following table presents information about non-performing assets and accruing TDRs as of December 31, for each of the last five years:
Non-performing Assets and Accruing TDRs
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans, including non-accrual TDRs | $ | 2,578 | $ | 2,234 | $ | 3,788 | $ | 5,522 | $ | 6,356 | $ | 5,581 | $ | 9,084 | $ | 4,696 | $ | 2,578 | $ | 2,234 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing | - | - | - | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans | 2,578 | 2,234 | 3,788 | 5,522 | 6,375 | 5,581 | 9,084 | 4,696 | 2,578 | 2,234 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned | 1,023 | 2,048 | 3,154 | 2,255 | 4,246 | 58 | 289 | 919 | 1,023 | 2,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-performing assets | 1,900 | 2,160 | - | - | - | 1,900 | 1,900 | 1,900 | 1,900 | 2,160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets | $ | 5,501 | $ | 6,442 | $ | 6,942 | $ | 7,777 | $ | 10,621 | $ | 7,539 | $ | 11,273 | $ | 7,515 | $ | 5,501 | $ | 6,442 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Accruing TDRs | $ | 9,299 | $ | 4,176 | $ | 4,982 | $ | 5,282 | $ | 3,995 | $ | 6,975 | $ | 7,745 | $ | 8,457 | $ | 9,299 | $ | 4,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans, gross | 0.34 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.99 | % | 0.62 | % | 1.10 | % | 0.56 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Despite economic uncertainty and elevated unemployment due to COVID-19, FNCB's asset quality metrics improved throughout 2020. Total non-performingnon-performing assets decreased $0.9$3.7 million, or 14.6%33.1%, to $5.5 $7.5million at December 31, 20172020 from $6.4$11.3 million at December 31, 2016.2019. The reduction in non-performing assets decreasewas due primarily due to a decrease in other real estate ownednon-accrual loans of $1.0$3.5 million, or 50.0%. Non-accrualcoupled with a $231 thousand decrease in OREO. The reduction in non-accrual loans increased by $0.3 million,was primarily attributable to onethe return of several large commercial relationship, which was also modified as a TDRrelationshipsto accrual status during the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. FNCB’s ratio of non-performing loans to total gross loans increaseddecreased to 0.34%0.62% at December 31, 20172020 from 0.31%1.10% at December 31, 2016.2019. Similarly, FNCB’s ratio of non-performing assets as a percentage of shareholders’ equity improveddecreased to 6.2%4.8% at December 31, 20172020 from 7.1%8.4% at December 31, 2016.2019. While credit quality metrics of FNCB's loan portfolio improved comparing December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, management believes the COVID-19 pandemic may have an adverse effect on asset quality in the future. Prolonged disruption to FNCB's customers could result in increased loan delinquencies, defaults and collateral devaluations. Management actively manages problem credits through workout efforts focused on developing strategies to resolve borrower difficulties through liquidation of collateral and other appropriate means. Additionally, management continues to monitor non-accrual loans, delinquency trends and economic conditions within FNCB’s market area on an on-going basis in order to proactively address any collection-related issues and mitigate any potential loss.losses.
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Balance, January 1 | $ | 9,084 | $ | 4,696 | ||||
Loans newly placed on non-accrual | 2,352 | 9,030 | ||||||
Change in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing | - | - | ||||||
Loans transferred to OREO | - | - | ||||||
Loans returned to performing status | (1,573 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||
Loans charged-off | (1,514 | ) | (2,589 | ) | ||||
Loan payments received | (2,768 | ) | (2,008 | ) | ||||
Balance, December 31 | $ | 5,581 | $ | 9,084 | ||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Accruing: | ||||||||
30-59 days | 0.31 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||
60-89 days | 0.06 | % | 0.10 | % | ||||
90+ days | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Non-accrual | 0.62 | % | 1.10 | % | ||||
Total delinquencies | 0.99 | % | 1.46 | % | ||||
Other non-performing assets at December 31, 20172020 and 2016 include2019 was comprised solely of a classified account receivable secured by an evergreen letter of credit in the amount of $1.9 million, received in 2011 as part of a settlement agreement for a large construction, land acquisition and development loan for a residential development project in the Pocono region of Monroe County. The agreement provides for payment to FNCB as real estate building lots are sold. The project was stalled due to a decline in real estate values in this area following the financial crisis of 2008. The agreement provides for payment to FNCB as real estate building lots are sold. In 2016 management classified this receivable as substandard due to length of holding time and continues to monitor this project closely. To date, no lots have been sold; however,2019, economic development in this market area has recently improvedstarted to improve and management had confirmed that the developer for this project had resumed construction activity, including the completion of substantial infrastructure, and had increased marketing and sales initiatives related to the project. As of December 31, 2020, no single-unit lots have been sold, however, the construction of a seven-unit building that houses timeshare units has been completed and owners began occupying the units in the fourth quarter of 2020. Management continues to monitor this project byclosely and is currently in negotiations with with the developer has increased. Also includedto establish a repayment plan beginning in other non-performing assets at December 31, 2016 was foreclosed equipment2021. However, uncertainty and economic volatility associated with the COVID-19 pandemic are unknown and could negatively impact the timing of $260 thousand, which was sold during the year ended December 31, 2017, resulting in a net gain of $47 thousand included in non-interest income within the consolidated statements of income. sales and payments.
TDRs at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 were $10.2$7.7 million and $4.3$9.1 million, respectively. Accruing and non-accruing TDRs were $9.3$7.0 million and $0.9 $0.7million, respectively at December 31, 20172020 and $4.2$7.7 million and $0.1$1.4 million, respectively at December 31, 2016. There2019. Loans modified as TDRs during the year ended December 31, 2020, included three commercial and industrial loans and one residential mortgage loan. The three commercial loans with an aggregate pre- and post-modification recorded investment of $196 thousand, were ninemodified under forbearance agreements. The modification of the residential loan involved an extension of terms and had a pre- and post-modification recorded investment of $93 thousand. In 2019, there were seven loan relationships modified as TDRs during the year, ended December 31, 2017, which incorporated a total of sixteenten individual loans. There were three loan relationships,was one relationship with an aggregate post-modification recorded investment of $865 thousand that was comprised of eighttwo commercial real estate loans and one commercial and industrial loan for which terms were extended and taxes capitalized. Additional TDR's included four residential real estate loans with a post-modification recorded investment totaling $5.3 million,$289 thousand and two loan relationships, comprised of fourthree other commercial and industrial loans totaling $1.8 million, that were modified under varying forms$712 thousand, involving an extension of forbearance agreements duringterms. Subsequent to modification, FNCB charged-off one of the year ended December 31, 2017. Additional TDRs included two consumercommercial loans totaling $85 thousand that had their terms extended and delinquent taxes capitalized, as well as two residential real estate loans totaling $190 thousand that had their terms extended. The commercial real estate modifications included a principal forbearance agreement for one loan in the amount of $4.0 million$235 thousand.
For additional information about TDRs, see Note 5, "Loans" of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and reductions in required monthly principal payments resulting in balloon payments due at maturity for seven loansSupplementary Data" to two borrowers aggregating $1.2 million. The four commercial and industrial loan modifications involved the delay of required principal and interest payments for predefined time periods.this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The average balance of impaired loans was $10.9 million and $6.9 $13.8million for both the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.2019. FNCB recognized interest on impaired loans of $392$351 thousand in 20172020 and $202$398 thousand in 2016.
The following table presents the changes in non-performing loans for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Loan foreclosures represent recorded investment at time of foreclosure not including the effect of any guarantees:2019.
Changes in Non-performing LoansModifications Related to COVID-19
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Balance, January 1 | $ | 2,234 | $ | 3,788 | ||||
Loans newly placed on non-accrual | 3,586 | 3,853 | ||||||
Change in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing | - | - | ||||||
Loan foreclosures | (80 | ) | (1,177 | ) | ||||
Loans returned to performing status | (180 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||
Loans charged-off | (1,399 | ) | (2,556 | ) | ||||
Loan payments received | (1,583 | ) | (1,527 | ) | ||||
Balance, December 31 | $ | 2,578 | $ | 2,234 | ||||
The additional interest incomeIn late March 2020, the federal banking regulators issued guidance encouraging banks to work prudently with and provide short-term payment accommodations to borrowers affected by COVID-19. Additionally, Section 4013 of the CARES Act addressed COVID-19 related modifications and specified that wouldsuch modifications made on loans that were current as of December 31, 2019 do not need to be classified as TDRs. FNCB has applied this guidance and made 922 such modifications, with 843 loans having an aggregate recorded investment of $151.4 million outstanding as of December 31, 2020. These initial modifications provided borrowers with a short-term, typically three-month, interest-only period or full payment deferral. FNCB extended a second payment deferral modification for 79 loans with an aggregate recorded investment of $22.0 million. Management is closely monitoring all loans for which a payment deferral has been granted and will continue to follow regulatory guidance when working with the borrowers which have been earned on non-accrualimpacted by COVID-19 and restructured loans hadapply the loans been performingprovisions of the CARES Act in accordance with their original terms approximated $0.2 million for both years endedmaking any TDR determinations. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016.2020, there were 45 loans with an aggregate recorded investment of $9.5 million, or 1.06% of total loans, that were still under deferral.
The following table presents accruinginformation about COVID-19 related loan delinquencies and non-accrual loansmodifications by major loan category as a percentage of gross loans at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:2020.
Loan Delinquencies and Non-accrual Loans
As of December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Loans Modified | Total Number of Loans Still Under Deferral | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Number of Loans | Recorded Investment | % of Loan Category | Number of Loans | Recorded Investment | % of Loan Category | ||||||||||||||||||
COVID-19 related loan modifications: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 199 | $ | 17,594 | 8.96 | % | 5 | $ | 196 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 146 | 94,586 | 34.53 | % | 6 | 8,617 | 3.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 11 | 11,019 | 18.43 | % | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 106 | 21,659 | 9.08 | % | 1 | 42 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 381 | 6,587 | 7.67 | % | 33 | 677 | 0.79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivision | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 843 | $ | 151,445 | 16.76 | % | 45 | 9,532 | 1.06 | % | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Accruing: | ||||||||||||
30-59 days | 0.27 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.18 | % | ||||||
60-89 days | 0.11 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.14 | % | ||||||
90+ days | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||
Non-accrual | 0.34 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.52 | % | ||||||
Total delinquencies | 0.72 | % | 0.81 | % | 0.84 | % | ||||||
Total delinquencies as a percent
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The ALLL represents management’s estimate of probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The ALLL is analyzed in accordance with GAAP and is maintained at a level that is based on management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the ALLL in relation to the risks inherent in the loan portfolio.
As part of its evaluation, management considers qualitative and environmental factors, including, but not limited to:
changes in national, local, and business economic conditions and developments, including the condition of various market segments;
changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio;
changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards, collection, charge-off and recovery practices and results;
changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff;
changes in the quality of the loan review system and the degree of oversight by the Board of Directors;
changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past due and classified loans, including trends in the volume of non-accrual loans, TDRs and other loan modifications;
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations;
the effect of external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the current loan portfolio; and
analysis of customers’ credit quality, including knowledge of their operating environment and financial condition.
● | changes in national, local, and business economic conditions and developments, including the condition of various market segments; |
● | changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; |
● | changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards, collection, charge-off and recovery practices and results; |
● | changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff; |
● | changes in the quality of the loan review system and the degree of oversight by the Board of Directors; |
● | changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past due and classified loans, including trends in the volume of non-accrual loans, TDRs and other loan modifications; |
● | the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations; |
● | the effect of external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the current loan portfolio; and |
● | analysis of customers’ credit quality, including knowledge of their operating environment and financial condition. |
Evaluations are intrinsically subjective, as the results are estimated based on management knowledge and experience and are subject to interpretation and modification as information becomes available or as future events occur. Management monitors the loan portfolio on an ongoing basis with emphasis on weakness in both the real estate market and the economy in general and its effect on repayment. Adjustments to the ALLL are made based on management’s assessment of the factors noted above.
In its evaluation of the ALLL, management considers a variety of qualitative factors including changes in the volume and severity of delinquencies. Management also considers the economic conditions in FNCB’s market area and continues to notice some weakness. As previously mentioned, the unemployment rate for the Scranton-Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton metropolitan area, FNCB’s predominant market area, improved to 5.6% for December 2017 from 6.0% for December 2016. However, unemployment in FNCB’s market continues to rank among the highest as compared to Pennsylvania’s 21 metropolitan areas. Moreover, the improvement in employment conditions for FNCB’s market area lagged behind the improvement in conditions experienced for the entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in which the unemployment rate declined to 4.7% for December 2017 from 5.6% for December 2016. FNCB tries to mitigate the effects of changes in economic conditions by emphasizing strict underwriting standards.
For purposes of management’s analysis of the ALLL, all loan relationships with an aggregate balance greater than $100 thousand that are rated substandard and non-accrual, identified as doubtful or loss, and all TDRs are considered impaired and are analyzed individually to determine the amount of impairment. Circumstances such as construction delays, declining real estate values, and the inability of the borrowers to make scheduled payments have resulted in these loan relationships being classified as impaired. FNCB utilizes the fair value of collateral method for collateral-dependent loans and TDRs for which repayment depends on the sale of collateral. For non-collateral-dependent loans and TDRs, FNCB measures impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate. With regard to collateral-dependent loans, appraisals are received at least annually to ensure that impairment measurements reflect current market conditions. Should a current appraisal not be available at the time of impairment analysis, other valuation sources including current letters of intent, broker price opinions or executed agreements of sale may be used. Only downward adjustments are made based on these supporting values. Included in all impairment calculations is a cost to sell adjustment of approximately 10%, which is based on typical cost factors, including a 6% broker commission, 1% transfer taxes and 3% various other miscellaneous costs associated with the sales process. Sales costs are periodically reviewed and revised based on actual experience. The ALLL analysis is adjusted for subsequent events that may arise after the end of the reporting period but before the financial reports are filed.
The ALLL equaled $9.0$11.9 million at December 31, 2017,2020, an increase of $0.6$3.0 million, or 33.5%, from $8.4$8.9 million at December 31, 2016.2019. The increase resulted from a provision for loan and lease losses of $769 thousand$1.9 million coupled with net recoveries of $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, partially offset2020. The increase in the ALLL was primarily related to economic disruption and uncertainty caused by net charge-offs of $154 thousandthe COVID-19 pandemic. Management adjusted the qualitative factors for the same period.potential effect of economic and employment uncertainty and disruption due to the global pandemic into its evaluation.
The ALLL consists of both specific and general components. The component of the ALLL that is related to impaired loans that are individually evaluated for impairment, the guidance for which is provided by ASC 310 “Impairment of a Loan” (“ASC 310”), was $0.8 million,$416 thousand, or 8.6%3.5%, of the total ALLL at December 31, 2020, compared to $473 thousand, or 5.3%, of the total ALLL at December 31, 2017, compared to $0.3 million, or 3.6%, of the total ALLL at December 31, 2016. The increase in reserves for loans individually evaluated for impairment resulted primarily from a reserve established for a large commercial and industrial loan relationship that was transferred to non-accrual and modified as a TDR during 2017.2019. A general reserve of $8.2 $11.5million was established for loans analyzed collectively under ASC 450 “Contingencies” (“ASC 450”), which represented 91.4%96.5% of the total ALLL of $9.0 million.$11.9 million at December 31, 2020. Included in the general component of the ALLL at December 31, 2020 and 2019 were unallocated reserves of $1.1 million and $426 thousand, respectively. Based on its evaluations, management may establish an unallocated component to cover any inherent losses that exist as of the evaluation date, but which may not have been identified under the methodology. The increase in the unallocated reserve was directly related to the increase in credit provisioning due to the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on these circumstances, management believes the increase and level of the unallocated reserve to be appropriate at December 31, 2020. The ratio of the ALLL to total loans at December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 20162019 was 1.17%1.33% and 1.15%1.08%, respectively, based on total loans, grossnet of $768.1 net deferred loan costs and unearned income of $901.1million and $728.8$828.5 million, respectively.
The following table presents an allocation of the ALLL by major loan category and percent of loans in each category to total loans at December 31, for each of the last five years:
Allocation of the ALLL
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance | Percentage of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 1,236 | 20.58 | % | $ | 1,171 | 19.72 | % | $ | 1,333 | 17.87 | % | $ | 1,772 | 18.35 | % | $ | 2,287 | 17.86 | % | $ | 1,715 | 21.73 | % | $ | 1,147 | 22.73 | % | $ | 1,175 | 22.09 | % | $ | 1,236 | 23.36 | % | $ | 1,171 | 23.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 3,499 | 34.08 | % | 3,297 | 33.32 | % | 3,346 | 33.54 | % | 4,663 | 34.87 | % | 6,017 | 33.97 | % | 4,268 | 30.32 | % | 3,198 | 33.69 | % | 3,107 | 31.46 | % | 3,499 | 34.08 | % | 3,297 | 33.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 209 | 2.73 | % | 268 | 2.51 | % | 853 | 4.22 | % | 665 | 2.81 | % | 924 | 3.79 | % | 538 | 6.62 | % | 271 | 5.75 | % | 188 | 2.49 | % | 209 | 2.73 | % | 268 | 2.52 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 2,340 | 19.54 | % | 1,736 | 21.01 | % | 1,205 | 20.49 | % | 2,104 | 19.72 | % | 2,321 | 19.74 | % | 2,619 | 26.39 | % | 1,997 | 17.86 | % | 2,552 | 18.08 | % | 2,340 | 19.54 | % | 1,736 | 20.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 1,395 | 17.53 | % | 1,457 | 17.47 | % | 1,494 | 17.58 | % | 1,673 | 18.24 | % | 1,789 | 18.44 | % | 1,319 | 9.51 | % | 1,658 | 14.66 | % | 2,051 | 18.81 | % | 1,395 | 14.75 | % | 1,457 | 14.30 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 355 | 5.54 | % | 490 | 5.97 | % | 485 | 6.30 | % | 598 | 6.01 | % | 679 | 6.20 | % | 405 | 5.43 | % | 253 | 5.31 | % | 417 | 7.07 | % | 355 | 5.54 | % | 490 | 5.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated | - | 0.00 | % | - | 0.00 | % | 74 | 0.00 | % | 45 | 0.00 | % | - | 0.00 | % | 1,086 | - | % | 426 | - | % | 29 | - | % | - | - | % | - | - | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 9,034 | 100.00 | % | $ | 8,419 | 100.00 | % | $ | 8,790 | 100.00 | % | $ | 11,520 | 100.00 | % | $ | 14,017 | 100.00 | % | $ | 11,950 | 100.00 | % | $ | 8,950 | 100.00 | % | $ | 9,519 | 100.00 | % | $ | 9,034 | 100.00 | % | $ | 8,419 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents an analysis of the ALLL by loan category for each of the last five years:
Reconciliation of the ALLL
For the Year Ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, | $ | 8,419 | $ | 8,790 | $ | 11,520 | $ | 14,017 | $ | 18,536 | $ | 8,950 | $ | 9,519 | $ | 9,034 | $ | 8,419 | $ | 8,790 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 192 | 153 | 139 | 204 | 664 | - | 27 | 63 | 192 | 153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 159 | 398 | 912 | - | 65 | 336 | - | 1,845 | 159 | 398 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | - | - | 688 | 45 | 179 | - | 18 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 495 | 1,107 | 180 | 217 | 341 | 254 | 1,258 | 97 | 495 | 1,107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 603 | 960 | 716 | 922 | 655 | 975 | 1,311 | 1,134 | 603 | 960 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivision | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total charge-offs | 1,449 | 2,618 | 2,635 | 1,388 | 1,904 | 1,565 | 2,614 | 3,139 | 1,449 | 2,618 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries of charged-off loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 29 | 4 | 58 | 90 | 343 | 43 | 9 | 135 | 29 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 45 | 6 | 307 | 362 | 879 | 846 | 32 | 42 | 45 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 480 | 9 | - | 3,538 | 130 | - | 82 | 30 | 480 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 360 | 507 | 400 | 262 | 1,853 | 1,220 | 364 | 291 | 360 | 507 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 381 | 568 | 485 | 508 | 450 | 515 | 761 | 576 | 381 | 568 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivision | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total recoveries | 1,295 | 1,094 | 1,250 | 4,760 | 3,655 | 2,624 | 1,248 | 1,074 | 1,295 | 1,094 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs (recoveries) | 154 | 1,524 | 1,385 | (3,372 | ) | (1,751 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 769 | 1,153 | (1,345 | ) | (5,869 | ) | (6,270 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31 | $ | 9,034 | $ | 8,419 | $ | 8,790 | $ | 11,520 | $ | 14,017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (recoveries) charge-offs | (1,059 | ) | 1,366 | 2,065 | 154 | 1,524 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | 1,941 | 797 | 2,550 | 769 | 1,153 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, | $ | 11,950 | $ | 8,950 | $ | 9,519 | $ | 9,034 | $ | 8,419 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percentage of average loans | 0.02 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.20 | % | (0.51 | )% | (0.28 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (recoveries) charge-offs as a percentage of average loans | (0.12 | )% | 0.16 | % | 0.25 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percent of gross loans outstanding at period end | 1.17 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.72 | % | 2.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percent of gross loans at end of period | 1.33 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percent of gross loans at end of period, excluding PPP Loans | 1.45 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Real Estate Owned
At December 31, 2017,2020, there were five properties was one piece of commercial landwith an aggregate carrying value of $1.0 million$58 thousand held in OREO, compared to ninetwo properties with an aggregate balance of $2.0 million$289 thousand at December 31, 2016. 2019. The two properties that were held as of December 31, 2019, included the piece of commercial land and a single family residential real estate property with carrying values of $85 thousand and $204 thousand, respectively. FNCB recorded a valuation adjustment to the carrying value of the piece of commercial land of $27 thousand in the third quarter of 2020. The residential real estate property, which was the collateral supporting an investor-owned residential mortgage loan, was sold in 2020. The agreement with the investor requires FNCB to take title of the property upon foreclosure and liquidate the property on behalf of the investor after foreclosure. FNCB did not realize any gain or loss upon the sale.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, FNCB foreclosed upon two residential real estate properties with a carrying value of $125 thousand. During the year ended December 31, 2016, FNCB foreclosed on two properties with an aggregate carrying value of $950 thousand.
Included in OREO were three properties previously held in bank premises and equipment that were transferred to OREO due to a change in their intended use. The properties include two commercial lots previously held for future expansion and a former branch office located in Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. The aggregate carrying value of these properties was $0.9 million and represented 91.1% of OREO at December 31, 2017. Subsequently, on March 1, 2018, the former Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania branch office with a carrying value of $428 thousand was sold for $465 thousand.
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, there were threefive sales and one partial sale of properties with an aggregate carrying value of $0.8 million. Net gains realized on the sale of these properties was $79 thousand, which is included in non-interest income. There were three sales and one partial$20 thousand. Net gains on the sale of OREO properties with an aggregate carrying value of $1.9 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, with net gains realized on the sales of $49 thousand, which iswere included in non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.
FNCB actively markets OREO properties for sale through a variety of channels including internal marketing and the use of outside brokers/realtors. The carrying value of OREO is generally calculated at an amount not greater than 90% of the most recent fair market appraised value unless specific conditions warrant an exception. A 10% factor is generally used to estimate costs to sell, which is based on typical cost factors, such as 6% broker commission, 1% transfer taxes, and 3% various other miscellaneous costs associated with the sales process. This fair value is updated on an annual basis or more frequently if new valuation information is available. Deterioration in the real estate market could result in additional losses on these properties. FNCB incurred valuationValuation adjustments of $322related to OREO totaled $27 thousandfor the year ended December 31, 2020 and $85 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2017, of2019, which $307 thousand isare included in expense of other real estate ownedoperating expense in the consolidated statements of income. A $15 thousand valuation adjustment recorded during 2017 was related to an investor loan, and accordingly reduced the liability owed to the investor. Valuation adjustments totaled $169 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2016.
The following table presents the activity in OREO for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015:2019:
Activity in OREO
For the Years Ended December 31, | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, Janauary 1 | $ | 2,048 | $ | 3,154 | $ | 2,255 | $ | 289 | $ | 919 | ||||||||||
Real estate foreclosures | 125 | 950 | 1,717 | - | 256 | |||||||||||||||
Transfer from bank premises | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Valuation adjustments | (322 | ) | (169 | ) | (208 | ) | (27 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||||||||
Carrying value of OREO sold | (828 | ) | (1,887 | ) | (610 | ) | (204 | ) | (801 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31 | $ | 1,023 | $ | 2,048 | $ | 3,154 | $ | 58 | $ | 289 | ||||||||||
The following table presents a distribution of OREO at December 31, for the past five years:
Distribution of OREO
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land / lots | $ | 516 | $ | 641 | $ | 785 | $ | 1,287 | $ | 3,549 | $ | 58 | $ | 85 | $ | 436 | $ | 516 | $ | 641 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 427 | 1,380 | 2,342 | 941 | 647 | - | - | 438 | 427 | 1,380 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 80 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 50 | - | 204 | 45 | 80 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other real estate owned | $ | 1,023 | $ | 2,048 | $ | 3,154 | $ | 2,255 | $ | 4,246 | $ | 58 | $ | 289 | $ | 919 | $ | 1,023 | $ | 2,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The expenses related to maintaining OREO includinginclude the subsequent write-downs of the properties related to declines in value since foreclosure, net of any income received,received. OREO expenses amounted to $0.5 million, $0.4 million, $164 thousand and $0.4 million$231 thousand and are included in other operating expense in the consolidated statements of income, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020 and 2015,2019, respectively.
Deposits
Total deposits decreased $12.7 million, or 1.3%, to $1.002 billion at December 31, 2017 from $1.015 billion at the end of 2016. Non-interest-bearing demand deposits increased $2.6 million, or 1.5%, while interest-bearing deposits decreased $15.3 million, or 1.8%. The increase in non-interest-bearing demand deposits primarily reflected growth in business checking deposits, while the decrease in interest-bearing deposits was primarily due to a reduction in municipal deposit accounts of $66.0 million, to $237.9 million at December 31, 2017 from $303.9 million at December 31, 2016. The decrease in municipal deposits reflected the anticipated exit of short-term funds related to the sale of a municipal utility in December 2016, partially mitigated by the attainment of new relationships through the government banking department. Partially offsetting this decrease were increases in money market accounts of $45.2 million to $174.8 million at December 31, 2017 from $129.7 million at December 31, 2016 and time deposits of $5.3 million to $192.3 million at December 31, 2017 from $187.1 million at December 31, 2016. The 34.8% increase in money market accounts resulted primarily from an inflow of funds from one large commercial depositor, coupled with the addition of funds from a large commercial depositor that participates in FNCB’s ICS program through the Promontory Interfinancial Network.
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits averaged $7.9 million, or 5.3%, higher at $156.7 million in 2017 as compared to $148.7 million in 2016. Interest-bearing deposits averaged $802.3 million in 2017, an increase of $61.2 million, or 8.3%, compared to $741.1 million in 2016. The increase was concentrated in interest-bearing demand deposits, which increased $67.1 million, or 15.4%, to $502.2 million in 2017 from $435.1 million in 2016 due primarily to growth in municipal deposit accounts. In addition, average savings deposits increased $4.8 million, or 4.9% comparing 2017 and 2016. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease of $10.6 million, or 5.1%, in average total time deposits. FNCB’s deposit funding costs increased 7 basis points to 0.44% in 2017 from 0.37% in 2016, which was driven primarily by a 14-basis point increase in the average rate paid for interest-bearing demand deposits. Rates on savings deposits increased by 3 basis points, while rates on time deposits remained steady at 0.80% at both December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Management recognizes the importance of deposit growth as its primary funding source for loan products and is currently evaluatingregularly evaluates new products and strategies focused on growing commercial, and consumer demand deposit balances and municipal deposit relationshipsrelationships. FNCB experienced strong deposit demand in 2018.2020, which was concentrated primarily in non-maturity deposits. The strong demand was generally caused by factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic including among others, various government stimulus initiatives, PPP funding, and changes in consumer and saving habits and business investment in response to economic uncertainty. FNCB did experience some deposit migration during 2020 as maturing time deposits were redirected into non-maturity deposits.
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits averaged $78.0 million, or 47.5%, higher at $242.0 million in 2020 as compared to $164.0 million in 2019. Interest-bearing deposits averaged $908.5 million in 2020, an increase of $63.7 million, or 7.5%, compared to $844.8 million in 2019. The increase was concentrated in average interest-bearing demand deposits which increased $98.0 million, or 19.1% comparing 2020 and 2019. Average savings deposits increased $8.7 million, or 9.3%, to $101.8 million in 2020 from $93.1 million in 2019. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease of $43.0 million, or 18.1%, in average time deposits, to $195.1 million in 2020 from $238.1 million in 2019. FNCB’s deposit funding costsdecreased 37 basis points, to 0.59% in 2020 from 0.96% in 2019. Rates on interest-bearing demand and time depositsdecreased by 33 basis points and 38 basis points, respectively, while savings deposit rates decreased to a lesser extent, by 3 basis points to 0.10% comparing 2020 and 2019. The decrease in deposit costs reflected lower market interest rates and oversupply of bank liquidity in 2020.
The average balancebalance of, and the rate paid on, the major classifications of deposits for the past three years are summarized in the following table:
Deposit Distribution
For the Year Ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | Average | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand | $ | 502,170 | 0.36 | % | $ | 435,092 | 0.22 | % | $ | 358,442 | 0.19 | % | $ | 611,511 | 0.48 | % | $ | 513,542 | 0.81 | % | $ | 502,978 | 0.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings | 101,952 | 0.13 | % | 97,188 | 0.10 | % | 91,603 | 0.07 | % | 101,847 | 0.10 | % | 93,114 | 0.13 | % | 98,927 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time | 198,143 | 0.80 | % | 208,783 | 0.80 | % | 224,538 | 0.85 | % | 195,140 | 1.22 | % | 238,145 | 1.60 | % | 236,162 | 1.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 802,265 | 0.44 | % | 741,063 | 0.37 | % | 674,583 | 0.39 | % | 908,498 | 0.59 | % | 844,801 | 0.96 | % | 838,067 | 0.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits | 156,670 | 148,746 | 139,945 | 242,017 | 164,035 | 168,313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits | $ | 958,935 | $ | 889,809 | $ | 814,528 | $ | 1,150,515 | $ | 1,008,836 | $ | 1,006,380 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents the maturity distribution of time deposits of $100,000 or more at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
Maturity Distribution of Time Deposits $100,000 or More
December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
3 months or less | $ | 30,664 | $ | 27,461 | ||||
Over 3 through 6 months | 13,006 | 7,511 | ||||||
Over 6 through 12 months | 33,979 | 18,805 | ||||||
Over 12 months | 19,693 | 25,938 | ||||||
Total | $ | 97,342 | $ | 79,715 | ||||
December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
3 months or less | $ | 20,023 | $ | 17,471 | ||||
Over 3 through 6 months | 17,180 | 21,620 | ||||||
Over 6 through 12 months | 40,319 | 35,299 | ||||||
Over 12 months | 10,441 | 27,371 | ||||||
Total | $ | 87,963 | $ | 101,761 | ||||
Borrowings
Short-term borrowings generally represent overnight borrowing transactions through the FHLB of Pittsburgh, which provide for short-term funding requirements of FNCB and mature within one business day of the transaction. Short-term borrowings may also include federal funds purchased and borrowings through the Federal Reserve Discount Window, which are considered to be a contingency source of funding. Other than testing its availability for contingency funding planning purposes, FNCB did not purchase any federal funds or borrow from the Federal Reserve Discount Window during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. FNCB did not have any overnight advances outstandinghas an agreement with the FHLB which allows for borrowings, either overnight or term, up to a maximum borrowing capacity based on a percentage of Pittsburgh at December 31, 2017 or 2016.
Long-term debt is comprised of FHLB of Pittsburgh term advances, subordinated debentures and junior subordinated debentures and totaled $60.3 million at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $18.5 million, or 23.6%, from $78.8 million at December 31, 2016. On July 27, 2017, the Board of Directors of FNCB approved the acceleration of a $5.0 million partial repayment of principal on the Notes. The $5.0 million principal repayment, which was due and payable on September 1, 2018, was paid to Noteholders on September 1, 2017. The Notes have a fixed interest rate of 4.50%. The principal balance outstanding for these Notes was $5.0 million at December 31, 2017 and $10.0 million at December 31, 2016.
Advances through the FHLB of Pittsburgh decreased $13.5 million to $45.0 million at December 31, 2017 from $58.5 million at December 31, 2016. FHLB of Pittsburgh advances are collateralizedqualifying loans pledged under a blanket pledge agreement, andagreement. In addition to pledging loans, FNCB is also required to purchase FHLB of Pittsburgh stock based upon the amount of advances outstanding. As a result of the decrease in term advances, the FHLB of Pittsburgh stock requiredcredit extended. Loans that were pledged to be held by FNCB was $2.8collateralize borrowings under this agreement were $500.1 million at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $0.5 million from $3.32020 and $475.3 million at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017,2019. FNCB’s maximum borrowing capacity withwas $352.2 million at December 31, 2020. There was $75.0 million in letters of credit to secure municipal deposits outstanding at December 31, 2020 under this agreement. There were no overnight borrowings or term advances through the FHLB outstanding at December 31, 2020.
Advances through the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window generally include short-term advances which are fully collateralized by certain pledged loans in the amount of Pittsburgh$31.5 million under the Federal Reserve Bank’s Borrower-in-Custody (“BIC”) program. There were no advances under the BIC program outstanding at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. FNCB had available borrowing capacity of $16.4 million under this program at December 31, 2020.
The Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (“PPPLF”) was $314.3established by the Federal Reserve System on April 9, 2020 to provide participating lenders with liquidity to loan money under the PPP. PPPLF advances are collateralized by pools of PPP loans, have an interest rate of 0.35% and a maturity date equal to the term of the pool of PPP loans securing it. Repayment of PPP loans serving as collateral must be passed on to the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window to pay down the corresponding PPPLF advance. At December 31, 2020, there were no PPPLF advances outstanding and FNCB had liquidity available of $58.3 million of which had $269.5 million was available for borrowing purposes.through this facility.
FNCB also had $10.3 million of junior subordinated debentures outstanding at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. The interest rate on these debentures resets quarterly at a spread of1.67% above the current 3-month LIBOR rate.rate, currently 1.89% at December 31, 2020. The average interest rate paid on the junior subordinated debentures in 20172020 was 2.90%2.43%, compared to 2.39%4.17% in 2016.2019.
On September 1, 2009, FNCB offered only to accredited investors up to $25.0 million principal amount of unsecured subordinated debentures due September 1, 2019 (the "Notes"). The Notes had a fixed interest rate of 4.50%. On January 30, 2019, the Board of Directors of FNCB approved the acceleration of the final $5.0 million principal repayment on the Notes. The $5.0 million final payment, which was due and payable on September 1, 2019, was paid to Noteholders on February 8, 2019.
Average borrowed fundsdecreased $30.4$12.3 million, or 29.5%19.4%, to $72.8 $51.3million in 20172020 from $103.2$63.6 million in 2016.2019. The average rate paid for long-term debt increased 34on borrowed funds decreased 119 basis points to 1.76%1.47% in 20172020 from 1.42%2.66% in 2016.2019. The increasedecrease in rate on the long-term debtborrowed funds was due to increasesdecreases in the rates paid onfor FHLB borrowings and junior subordinated debentures which directly correlated with the increases indue to lower market interest rates throughout 2017. The maximum amountfor the majority of total borrowings outstanding at any month end during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $97.2 million and $145.1 million, respectively.2020.
For further discussion of FNCB’s borrowings, seeSee Note 8, “Borrowed Funds” inof the Notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, of"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for additional information about FNCB's borrowed funds.
Liquidity
The term liquidity refers to the ability to generate sufficient amounts of cash to meet cash flow needs. Liquidity is required to fulfill the borrowing needs of FNCB’s credit customers and the withdrawal and maturity requirements of its deposit customers, as well as to meet other financial commitments. FNCB’s liquidity position is impacted by several factors, which include, among others, loan origination volumes, loan and investment maturity structure and cash flows, deposit demand and certificate oftime deposit maturity structure and retention. FNCB has liquidity and contingent funding policies in place that are designed with controls in place to provide advanced detection of potentially significant funding shortfalls, establish methods for assessing and monitoring risk levels, and institute prompt responses that may alleviate a potential liquidity crisis. Management monitors FNCB’s liquidity position and fluctuations daily, forecasts future liquidity needs, performs periodic stress tests on its liquidity levels and develops strategies to ensure adequate liquidity at all times.
The statements of cash flows present the change in cash and cash equivalents from operating, investing and financing activities. Cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in other banks, which comprise cash and cash equivalents, are FNCB’s most liquid assets. At December 31, 2017,FNCB's liquidity position improved substantially in 2020, as an influx of cash from financing and operating activities were only partially offset by cash outflows used in investing activities. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $37.7 million, a decrease of $74.7 million from $112.4$155.8 million at December 31, 2016, as net cash outflows2020, an increase of $121.2 million from investing and financing activities exceeded net cash inflows from operating activities.
Cash outlays for investing activities used $53.5$34.6 million of cash and cash equivalents during the year endedat December 31, 2017, which was due largely to net increases in loans to customers of $41.5 million. Additionally, purchases of available-for-sale securities, net of proceeds received from sales, maturities, calls and principal reduction in 2017 used $13.6 million of cash and cash equivalents. Also in 2017, purchases of bank premises and equipment utilized $1.1 million cash and cash equivalents. Partially offsetting these outflows were cash inflows in 2017 from the sale of SBA guaranteed loans of $1.0 million and proceeds from the sale of OREO and other repossessed assets of $1.2 million.2019.
Financing activities used $33.0 provided $234.4million in net cash, which resulted primarily from a $12.7$285.7 million net decreaseincrease in deposits in 2020. This increase was slightly offset by net repayments ofcash used to repay FHLB of Pittsburgh term and overnight advances of $13.6$46.9 million a $5.0 million principal reduction on the Notes and cashpay quarterly dividends paid of $2.2totaling $4.4 million. Partially offsetting these outflows was net cash provided by operating activities in 2017 of $11.8 million. Operating activities include net income, adjusted for the effects of non-cash transactions including, among others, depreciation and amortization and the provision for loan and lease losses, and is the primary source for the remaining funds from operations. Specifically,In 2020 operating activities provided FNCB with $22.0 million in 2017 FNCB recordednet cash, which reflected net income of $0.1$15.3 million and non-cash adjustments to income of $11.6$6.7 million.
Net cash outflows from investing activities used $135.2 million of cash and cash equivalents during the year ended December 31, 2020, which included an $11.0was largely due to funding of PPP loans, resulting in a net increase in loans to customers of $73.3 million. In addition, purchases of available-for-sale debt securitiesin 2020 utilized $152.7 million decrease in net deferred tax assets, due largely tocash and cash equivalents, which was partially offset by the cash proceeds received from the non-recurring revaluation adjustment following enactmentsale of the Tax Act.available-for-sale debt securities of $68.3 million and from maturities, calls and principal payments of available-for-sale securities of $21.7 million.
Management is actively monitoring FNCB's liquidity position and capital adequacy in light of the changing circumstances related to economic uncertainty brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. While management believes FNCB's liquidity position is favorable, they are keenly aware that changes in economic conditions related to COVID-19, or in general, could pose potential stress on liquidity should deposits begin exiting the Bank or FNCB's asset quality deteriorates. Additionally, FNCB could experience an increase in the utilization of existing lines of credit as customers manage their own liquidity needs during this time of economic uncertainty. Management believes that FNCB’s liquidity position is sufficient to meet its cash flow needs as of December 31, 2017.2020. FNCB generally utilizes core deposits as its primary source of liquidity. Core deposits include non-interest-bearing and interest-bearing demand deposits, savings deposits and other time deposits, net of brokered deposits and one-way purchased deposits generated through the Promontory InterfinancialIntraFiSM Network, which include time deposits issued under CDARs program and money market and NOW accounts issued through the ICS program. Participating in the Promontory InterfinancialIntraFiSM Network programs allows FNCB to service and attract potential high-balance deposits customers who want the security of full-FDIC insurance but want to maintain a local deposit relationship. Core deposits averaged $876.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $160.3 million, or 22.4%, compared to $715.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in core deposits primarily reflected growth in interest-bearing demand, net ofReciprocal deposits issued through the ICSIntraFiSM Network program are considered to be core deposits. As of $67.1 million, other time deposits, net of brokered deposits and CDARs certificates, of $25.7 million, non-interest-bearing demand deposits of $7.9 million and savings deposits of $4.8 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017, FNCB’s balance to be considered a jumbo deposit was increased from $100 thousand to $250 thousand, which was2020, FNCB had approximately $24.6 million placed into the primary factor in the increase in other time deposits. reciprocal program.In addition to core deposits,cash and cash equivalents of $155.8 million, FNCB currently utilizes brokered certificates of deposit, certificates of deposits generated through a national listing service, funding through the Promontory Financial Network and advances through the FHLB of Pittsburgh as alternativehad ample sources of liquidity. At December 31, 2017, FNCB hadadditional liquidity including approximately $276.0 million in available borrowing capacity with the FHLB of Pittsburgh, and available borrowing capacity through The Federal Reserve Discount Window of $269.3 million.$58.3 million under the PPPLF and $16.4 million under the BIC program. In addition, FNCB had $47.0 million in federal fund lines of credit available through correspondent banks at December 31, 2020.
Capital
A strong capital base is essential to the continued growth and profitability of FNCB and is therefore a management priority. Management’s principal capital planning goals are to provideinclude: providing an adequate return to shareholders whileshareholders; retaining a sufficient base from which to provide for future growth, while at the same timeand complying with allapplicable regulatory standards. As more fully described in Note 14, “Regulatory Matters” to the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, regulatory authorities have prescribed specified minimum capital ratios as guidelines for determining capital adequacy to help assure the safety and soundness of financial institutions.
The following schedules present information regarding FNCB’s and the Bank’s risk-based capital at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and selected other capital ratios:
| Company | Bank | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes with Conservation Buffer | To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations* | FNCB Bank | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes with Conservation Buffer | Minimum Required To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) | $ | 101,135 | 12.08 | % | $ | 104,272 | 12.49 | % | 8.00 | % | 9.25 | % | 10.00 | % | $ | 149,173 | 15.79 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.50 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) | 89,220 | 10.66 | % | 94,856 | 11.36 | % | 6.00 | % | 7.25 | % | 8.00 | % | 137,356 | 14.54 | % | 6.00 | % | 8.50 | % | 8.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier I common equity (to risk-weighted assets) | 81,493 | 9.74 | % | 94,856 | 11.36 | % | 4.50 | % | 5.75 | % | 6.50 | % | 137,356 | 14.54 | % | 4.50 | % | 7.00 | % | 6.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier I capital (to average assets) | 89,220 | 7.74 | % | 94,856 | 8.24 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 137,356 | 9.57 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk-weighted assets | 837,032 | 834,959 | 944,546 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total average assets | 1,152,776 | 1,151,539 | 1,434,776 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company | Bank | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes with Conservation Buffer | To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) | $ | 96,827 | 12.06 | % | $ | 102,786 | 12.81 | % | 8.00 | % | 8.625 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) | 82,159 | 10.23 | % | 94,118 | 11.73 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.625 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier I common equity (to risk-weighted assets) | 80,049 | 9.97 | % | 94,118 | 11.73 | % | 4.50 | % | 5.125 | % | 6.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier I capital (to average assets) | 82,159 | 7.53 | % | 94,118 | 8.63 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.000 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total risk-weighted assets | 803,026 | 802,610 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total average assets | 1,090,665 | 1,090,550 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FNCB Bank | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes with Conservation Buffer | Minimum Required To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations | |||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) | $ | 133,406 | 14.77 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.50 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) | 123,753 | 13.70 | % | 6.00 | % | 8.5 | % | 8.00 | % | |||||||||||
| �� | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier I common equity (to risk-weighted assets) | 123,753 | 13.70 | % | 4.50 | % | 7.00 | % | 6.50 | % | |||||||||||
Tier I capital (to average assets) | 123,753 | 10.36 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||
Total risk-weighted assets | 903,172 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total average assets | 1,194,789 | |||||||||||||||||||
FNCB’s total regulatory capital increased $4.3$15.8 million to $101.1$149.2 million at December 31, 20172020 from $96.8$133.4 million at December 31, 2016. FNCB’s and the2019. The Bank’s risk-based capital ratios exceeded the minimum regulatory capital ratios required for adequately capitalized institutions. Based on the most recent notification from its primary regulators, the Bank was categorized as well capitalized at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. There are no conditions or events since this notification thethat management believes have changed this category.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, FNCB had 33,242,03729,754,351 shares of common stock available for future sale or share dividends. The number of shareholders of record at December 31, 20172020 was 1,804.1,671. Quarterly market highs and lows, dividends paid and known market makers are highlighted in Part I, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For further discussion of FNCB’s capital requirements and dividend limitations, refer to Note 14,15, “Regulatory Matters,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Additionally, FNCB has available 20,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock. There were no preferred shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
On January 27, 2021, FNCB's Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which up to 975,000 shares of FNCB's outstanding common stock may be acquired in the open market commencing no earlier than February 3, 2021 and expiring December 31, 2021 pursuant to a trading plan that was adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The shares will be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market transactions depending upon market conditions. Repurchases under the repurchase program are administered through an independent broker and are subject to SEC regulations as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the trading plan. Under the program, the purchases will be funded from available working capital presently available to FNCB, and the repurchased shares will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. There is not a guarantee as to the exact number of shares that will be repurchased by FNCB, and FNCB may discontinue purchases at any time that management determines additional repurchases are no longer warranted. As of December 31, 2020, FNCB had approximately 20,245,649 million shares outstanding. As of February 28, 2021, 8,188 shares were repurchased at an average price of $6.81 per share.
On February 8, 2019, FNCB completed a public offering of its shares of common stock in a firm commitment underwritten offering and issued 3,285,550 shares of its common stock, which included 428,550 shares of common stock issued upon the exercise in full of the option to purchase additional shares granted to underwriters, at a public offering price of $7.00 per share, less an underwriting discount of $0.35 per share. FNCB received net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses of $21.3 million. Following the receipt of the proceeds during the first quarter of 2019, FNCB made a capital investment in FNCB Bank, it's wholly-owned subsidiary of $17.8 million.
FNCB’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders is largely dependent on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to FNCB. Bank regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval of the Bank’s regulatory agency. Cash dividends declared and paid by FNCB during 2020 and 2019 were $0.22 per share and $0.20 per share, respectively. FNCB offers a Dividend Reinvestment and Optional CashStock Purchase Plan (“DRP”plan ("DRP"), which permitted participants to automatically reinvest cash dividends on all of theirits shareholders. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 dividend reinvestment shares and to make voluntary cash contributionswere purchased in open market transactions. However, shares under the terms of the plan at a discounted price. On April 27, 2016, the Board of Directors approved the reinstatementoptional cash purchase feature of the DRP effective June 1, 2016. Previously, the operation of the DRP had been suspended since 2011. Common shareswere issued under the DRP in 2017 and 2016 totaled 65,240 and 78,752, respectively. There were no sharesfrom authorized but unissued common shares. Shares of common stock issued under the DRP in 2015.
During totaled 10,271 and 7,369 for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, FNCB declared and paid dividends of $0.13 per share and $0.09 per share,2019, respectively. Subsequent to December 31, 2017,2020, on January 31, 2018,27, 2021, FNCB declared a dividend of $0.04$0.06 per share of common stock. The dividend is payable on March 15, 20182021 to shareholders of record on March 1, 2018.2021.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normalordinary course of operations, FNCB engages in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with GAAP, are not recorded in our consolidated financial statements or are recorded in amounts that differ from the notional amounts. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions may be used for general corporate purposes or for customer needs. Corporate purpose transactions would be used to help manage credit, interest rate and liquidity risk or to optimize capital. Customer transactions are used to manage customers' requests for funding.
For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, FNCB did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions that would have or would be reasonably likely to have a material effect on its consolidated financial condition. For a further discussion of FNCB’s off-balance sheet arrangements, refer to Note 12, “Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations” to the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table presents off-balance financial instruments whose contractual amounts represent credit risk at December 31, 20172020 and 2016. All2019. With the exception of credit availability for certain commercial construction, land acquisition and development loans having a 24-month draw period, all of the off-balance sheet financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 20172020 expire within one year of their respective contract dates.
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit | $ | 190,672 | $ | 150,111 | $ | 227,908 | $ | 275,891 | ||||||||
Standby letters of credit | 15,994 | 21,220 | 18,914 | 15,081 | ||||||||||||
In order to provide for probable losses inherent in these instruments, FNCB recorded reserves for unfunded commitments of $381$613 thousand and $249$703 thousand at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, which were included in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
FNCB’s Finance unit proactively monitors the level of unused commitments against the available sources of liquidity from its investment portfolio, from deposit gathering activities as well as available unused borrowing capacity from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve. The Finance unit reports the results of its liquidity monitoring regularly to FNCB’s Asset/Asset and Liability Management Committee ("ALCO"), the RateInvestment and Liquidity Committee, the Executive Management Committee and the Board of Directors.
Contractual Obligations
The following table details FNCB’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017. Payments due by period in the following table are based on final maturity dates without consideration of early redemption.
Maturities of Contractual Obligations
Contractual Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
Total | Less Than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | More Than 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances- term | $ | 44,968 | $ | 25,432 | $ | 19,536 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Subordinated debentures | 5,000 | - | 5,000 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debt | 10,310 | - | - | - | 10,310 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 1,199 | 374 | 392 | 256 | 177 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations | $ | 61,477 | $ | 25,806 | $ | 24,928 | $ | 256 | $ | 10,487 | ||||||||||
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Market risk is the risk to earnings and/or financial position resulting from adverse changes in market rates or prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity prices. FNCB’s exposure to market risk is primarily interest rate risk associated with our lending, investing and deposit gathering activities, all of which are other than trading. Changes in interest rates affect earnings by changing net interest income and the level of other interest-sensitive income and operating expenses. In addition, variations in interest rates affect the underlying economic value of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items.
LIBOR Replacement
The Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC") has proposed that the Secured Overnight Funding Rate ("SOFR") replace USD-LIBOR. ARRC has proposed that the transition to SOFR from USD-LIBOR will take place by the end of 2021. FNCB has various loans, investments, borrowings and interest rate swap contracts that are indexed to USD-LIBOR. On December 4, 2020, the ICE Benchmark Administration ("IBA"), which complies and oversees LIBOR, published a proposal announcing that it will hold a consultation through January 25, 2021 on its intention to extend most of the USD-LIBOR tenors to June 30, 2023. No formal announcement has been made, however, U.S. banking regulators have expressed support for the extension, and it is expected that the IBA will reaffirm the extension plans. FNCB is actively monitoring its LIBOR exposures and evaluating the risks involved.
Asset and Liability Management
FNCB manages these objectives through its Asset and Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) and its Rate and Liquidity and Investment Committees, which consistThe ALCO, comprised of certain members of management and certain members of the finance unit.Bank's board of directors, executive management of other appropriate officers, oversees FNCB's interest rate risk management program. Members of the committeesALCO meet regularlyquarterly, or more frequently as necessary, to develop balance sheet strategies affecting the future level of net interest income, liquidity and capital. The major objectives of ALCO are to:
● | manage exposure to changes in the interest rate environment by limiting the changes in net interest margin to an acceptable level within a reasonable range of interest rates; |
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
| maximize net interest income opportunities. |
ALCO monitors FNCB’s exposure to changes in net interest income over both a one-year planning horizon and a longer-term strategic horizon. ALCO uses net interest income simulations and economic value of equity (“EVE”) simulations as the primary tools in measuring and managing FNCB’s position and considers balance sheet forecasts, ourFNCB's liquidity position, the economic environment, anticipated direction of interest rates and FNCB’s earnings sensitivity to changes in these rates in its modeling. In addition, ALCO has established policy tolerance limits for acceptable negative changes in net interest income. Furthermore, as part of its ongoing monitoring, ALCO has been enhanced to requirerequires quarterly back testing of modeling results, which involves after-the-fact comparisons of projections with FNCB’s actual performance to measure the validity of assumptions used in the modeling techniques.
Earnings at Risk and Economic Value at Risk Simulations:
Earnings at Risk
Earnings-at-risk simulation measures the change in net interest income and net income under various interest rate scenarios. Specifically, given the current market rates, ALCO looks at “earnings at risk” to determine anticipated changes in net interest income from a base case scenario with scenarios of + 200, +400 and -100 basis points for simulation purposes. The simulation takes into consideration that not all assets and liabilities re-price equally and simultaneously with market rates (i.e., savings rate).
Economic Value at Risk
While earnings-at-risk simulation measures the short-term risk in the balance sheet, economic value (or portfolio equity) at risk measures the long-term risk by finding the net present value of the future cash flows from FNCB’s existing assets and liabilities. ALCO examines this ratio regularly, and given the current rate environment, has utilized rate shocks of +200, +400 and -100 basis points for simulation purposes. Management recognizes that, in some instances, this ratio may contradict the “earnings at risk” ratio.
While ALCO regularly performs a wide variety of simulations under various strategic balance sheet and treasury yield curve scenarios, the following results reflect FNCB’s sensitivity over the subsequent twelve months based on the following assumptions:
● | asset and liability levels |
● | cash flows are based on contractual maturity and amortization schedules with applicable prepayments derived from internal historical data and external sources; and |
● | cash flows are |
|
|
The following table illustrates the simulated impact of parallel and instantaneous interest rate shocks of +400 basis points, +200 basis points and -100 basis points on net interest income and the change in economic value over a one-year time horizon from the December 31, 20172020 levels:
Rates +200 | Rates +400 | Rates -100 | Rates +200 | Rates +400 | Rates -100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simulation | Policy | Simulation | Policy | Simulation | Policy | Simulation | Policy | Simulation | Policy | Simulation | Policy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results | Limit | Results | Limit | Results | Limit | Results | Limit | Results | Limit | Results | Limit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings at risk: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent change in net interest income | (2.9 | )% | (10.0 | )% | (6.4 | )% | (20.0 | )% | (2.8 | )% | (5.0 | )% | (1.0 | )% | (12.5 | )% | 0.6 | % | (20.0 | )% | (0.8 | )% | (10.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic value at risk: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent change in economic value of equity | (5.0 | )% | (20.0 | )% | (10.4 | )% | (35.0 | )% | (6.1 | )% | (10.0 | )% | 10.7 | % | (20.0 | )% | 16.7 | % | (35.0 | )% | (32.9 | )% | (10.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNCB was liability rate sensitiveModel results at December 31, 2017, as2020 indicated that FNCB's asset/liability position was relatively well matched in the near term and exhibited only minor sensitivity to changes in interest rates over the next twelve months. Model results at December 31, 2020 indicated that FNCB’s net interest income is expected to decrease 1.0% under a greater volume+200-basis point interest rate shock. Additionally, model results indicated that FNCB's economic value of interest-bearing liabilities than interest-earning assets will mature or repriceequity ("EVE") is expected to increase 10.7% under a parallel shift in interest rates of +200 basis points. Under a -100-basis point interest rate shock, model results indicated that FNCB's net interest income would decrease 0.8% and the EVE would decrease 32.9%, respectively. With the exception of a -100-basis point impact on the EVE, all modeled exposures of net interest income and EVE were within a one-year time frame, due to a significant amountinternal policy guidelines. Management does not believe that the modeled decrease in the EVE, which exceeds the current policy limit of non-maturity, interest-bearing deposit balances10.0%, poses any undue interest rate risk at the end of the period. Accordingly,December 31, 2020. Comparatively, model results at December 31, 2017 indicate that FNCB’s2019 indicated net interest income would be expected to decrease 4.8% and economic value of equity arewould be expected to decrease 2.9% and 5.0%, respectively, underincrease 1.7% given a 200-basis+200-basis point interest rate shock. In comparison, model resultsConversely, given a -100- basis point rate shock at December 31, 2016 indicated2019, net interest income waswould be expected to increase 1.9% and the economic value of equity would decrease 2.0% and 4.3% given +200 and +400 basis point rate shocks. Model results at December 31, 2017 continue to indicate that FNCB is short-term liability sensitive and long-term asset sensitive.7.1%.
This analysis does not represent a forecast for FNCB and should not be relied upon as being indicative of expected operating results. These simulations are based on numerous assumptions:assumptions, including but not limited to: the nature and timing of interest rate levels, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit decay rates, pricing decisions on loans and deposits, reinvestment/replacements of asset and liability cash flows, and other factors. While assumptions reflect current economic and local market conditions, FNCB cannot make any assurances as to the predictive nature of these assumptions, including changes in interest rates, customer preferences, competition and liquidity needs, or what actions ALCO might take in responding to these changes. In response to the economic disruption and uncertainty brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, the FOMC lowered the federal funds target rate a total of 150 basis points in two emergency actions with an expectation that the Committee will maintain a low interest rate environment for the foreseeable future. Given FNCB's current asset/liability position, the significantly lower market interest rates may have a negative impact on FNCB's earning asset yields and variable-rate loans and securities indexed to prime and LIBOR will reprice downward.
As previously mentioned, as part of its ongoing monitoring, ALCO requires quarterly back testing of modeling results, which involves after-the-fact comparisons of projections with FNCB’sFNCB’s actual performance to measure the validity of assumptions used in the modeling techniques. As part of its quarterly review, management compared tax-equivalent net interest income recorded for the three months ended December 31, 20172020 with tax-equivalent net interest income that was projected for the same three-month period. TheThere was a negative variance between actual and projected tax-equivalent net interest income for the three-month periodthree months ended December 31, 2017 was $1802020 of approximately$408 thousand, or 2.0%3.6%. AlthoughThe variance primarily reflected a difference in the variance was deemed immaterial,assumption for the volume and timing of the forgiveness of PPP loans used in the model with that actually experienced. As of December 31, 2020, FNCB has received $39.8 million in borrower forgiveness from the SBA and anticipates that the remaining PPP loan balances will qualify for forgiveness under the guidelines of the program. ALCO performs a detailed rate/volume analysis between actual and projected results in order to continue to improve the accuracy of its simulation models.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
FNCB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Opinion on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of FNCB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’shareholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the periodthen ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the periodthen ended, December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for theseThese consolidated financial statements for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessmentare the responsibility of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud and whether effectivefraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regardingThe critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the reliabilitycurrent period audit of financial reporting and the preparation ofconsolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertainwere communicated or required to be communicated to the maintenanceaudit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of records that,critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Allowance for Loan Losses – Qualitative Factor Adjustments
As described in Notes 1 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable and reasonable detail, accuratelyincurred credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company's allowance for loan losses was $11.95 million at December 31, 2020, which consisted of specific and fairly reflectgeneral reserve components of $0.42 million and $11.53 million, respectively.
In calculating the transactionsgeneral reserve component, management considered historical loss experience by segment and dispositionsqualitative factor adjustments for changes not reflected in the historical loss experience. The general reserve component of the assetsCompany’s allowance for loan losses involved consideration of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recordednational and local economic conditions, levels of and trends in classified loans, delinquency rates and nonaccrual loans, trends in volumes and terms of loans, changes in lending policies, lending personnel, and collateral, as necessary to permit preparation of financial statementswell as concentrations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,loan types, industry, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made onlygeography. Changes in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets thatthese qualitative factor adjustments could have a material effectimpact on the Company’s financial statements.results.
BecauseThe allowance for loan losses is an accounting estimate with significant measurement uncertainty and involves the application of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projectionssignificant judgment by management. Therefore, a high degree of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subjectauditor judgment and significant auditor effort was required in evaluating the audit evidence obtained related to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changesqualitative factor adjustments for the commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, construction, and land acquisition and development segments used by management in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies orcalculation.
The primary procedures may deteriorate.we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
● | Testing the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls over the evaluation of the qualitative factors used to estimate the loan segments, including controls addressing: |
o | Management's review of the completeness and accuracy of underlying data inputs used as the basis for determination of qualitative factor adjustments; |
o | Management’s determination of impaired loans excluded from the general reserve component of the allowance for loan losses; |
o | Management’s judgements related to the quantitative and qualitative assessment of underlying data used in the determination of qualitative factor adjustments and the resulting allocation to the allowance for loan losses; and, |
o | Management’s review of the qualitative factors for mathematical accuracy. |
● | Substantively testing the appropriateness of the judgments and assumptions used in management’s estimation process for developing the qualitative factor adjustments, including: |
o | Assessment of whether all relevant factors were considered that affect the collectability of the loan portfolio; |
o | Evaluation of the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying internal and external data inputs used as a basis for the qualitative factor adjustments and corroboration of these inputs by comparison to the Company’s lending practices, historical loan portfolio performance, and third-party macroeconomic data; |
o | Evaluation of the propriety of impaired loans excluded from the general reserve component of the allowance for loan losses; and, | |
| o | Recalculation of the allowance for loan loss and allocation of qualitative factor adjustments to the appropriate loan segments. |
/s/Baker Tilly Virchow Krause,US, LLP
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.
Baker Tilly US, LLP (formerly known as Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP)
Iselin, New Jersey
March 9, 2018 12, 2021
FNCB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | |||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION |
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 24,822 | $ | 23,944 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks | 130,989 | 10,621 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 155,811 | 34,565 | ||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities, at fair value | 350,035 | 272,839 | ||||||
| Equity securities, at fair value | 3,026 | 920 | ||||||
Restricted stock, at cost | 1,745 | 3,804 | ||||||
Loans held for sale | 2,107 | 1,061 | ||||||
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $11,950 and $8,950 | 889,152 | 819,529 | ||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net | 17,579 | 17,518 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 4,286 | 3,234 | ||||||
Bank-owned life insurance | 31,712 | 31,230 | ||||||
Other assets | 10,226 | 18,841 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,465,679 | $ | 1,203,541 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Deposits: | ||||||||
Demand (non-interest-bearing) | $ | 271,499 | $ | 179,465 | ||||
Interest-bearing | 1,015,949 | 822,244 | ||||||
Total deposits | 1,287,448 | 1,001,709 | ||||||
Borrowed funds: | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances | 0 | 46,909 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 10,310 | 10,310 | ||||||
Total borrowed funds | 10,310 | 57,219 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable | 108 | 258 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 11,953 | 10,748 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,309,819 | 1,069,934 | ||||||
Shareholders' equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock ($1.25 par) | ||||||||
Authorized: 20,000,000 shares at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 | ||||||||
Issued and outstanding: 0 shares at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Common stock ($1.25 par) | ||||||||
Authorized: 50,000,000 shares at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 | ||||||||
Issued and outstanding: 20,245,649 shares at December 31, 2020 and 20,171,408 shares at December 31, 2019 | 25,307 | 25,214 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 81,587 | 81,130 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 35,080 | 24,207 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 13,886 | 3,056 | ||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 155,860 | 133,607 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 1,465,679 | $ | 1,203,541 | ||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. |
FNCB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF |
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 22,755 | $ | 20,562 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks | 14,991 | 91,883 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 37,746 | 112,445 | ||||||
Securities available for sale, at fair value | 290,387 | 276,015 | ||||||
Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, at cost | 2,753 | 3,311 | ||||||
Loans held for sale | 1,095 | 596 | ||||||
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $9,034 and $8,419 | 761,609 | 722,860 | ||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net | 10,388 | 10,784 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 3,234 | 2,757 | ||||||
Bank-owned life insurance | 30,460 | 29,933 | ||||||
Other real estate owned | 1,023 | 2,048 | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets | 15,785 | 26,875 | ||||||
Other assets | 7,825 | 7,975 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,162,305 | $ | 1,195,599 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Deposits: | ||||||||
Demand (non-interest-bearing) | $ | 176,325 | $ | 173,702 | ||||
Interest-bearing | 826,123 | 841,437 | ||||||
Total deposits | 1,002,448 | 1,015,139 | ||||||
Borrowed funds: | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances | 44,968 | 58,537 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures | 5,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 10,310 | 10,310 | ||||||
Total borrowed funds | 60,278 | 78,847 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable | 241 | 242 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 10,147 | 11,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,073,114 | 1,105,228 | ||||||
Shareholders' equity | ||||||||
Preferred shares ($1.25 par) | ||||||||
Authorized: 20,000,000 shares at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | ||||||||
Issued and outstanding: 0 shares at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | - | - | ||||||
Common shares ($1.25 par) | ||||||||
Authorized: 50,000,000 shares at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | ||||||||
Issued and outstanding: 16,757,963 shares at December 31, 2017 and 16,645,845 shares at December 31, 2016 | 20,947 | 20,807 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 63,210 | 62,593 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 6,779 | 8,531 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,745 | ) | (1,560 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders' equity | 89,191 | 90,371 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 1,162,305 | $ | 1,195,599 | ||||
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Interest income | ||||||||
Interest and fees on loans | $ | 37,615 | $ | 37,818 | ||||
Interest and dividends on securities: | ||||||||
U.S. government agencies | 2,336 | 3,545 | ||||||
State and political subdivisions, tax-free | 1,373 | 149 | ||||||
State and political subdivisions, taxable | 3,025 | 3,263 | ||||||
Other securities | 1,961 | 1,093 | ||||||
Total interest and dividends on securities | 8,695 | 8,050 | ||||||
Interest on interest-bearing deposits in other banks | 28 | 188 | ||||||
Total interest income | 46,338 | 46,056 | ||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||
Interest on deposits | 5,404 | 8,101 | ||||||
Interest on borrowed funds: | ||||||||
| Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window advances | 32 | 0 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances | 474 | 1,241 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures | 0 | 24 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 250 | 430 | ||||||
Total interest on borrowed funds | 756 | 1,695 | ||||||
Total interest expense | 6,160 | 9,796 | ||||||
Net interest income before provision for loan and lease losses | 40,178 | 36,260 | ||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | 1,941 | 797 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses | 38,237 | 35,463 | ||||||
Non-interest income | ||||||||
Deposit service charges | 3,252 | 3,035 | ||||||
Net gain on the sale of available-for-sale securities | 1,528 | 1,227 | ||||||
Net gain on equity securities | 1,171 | 29 | ||||||
Net gain on the sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 653 | 253 | ||||||
Net gain on the sale of other real estate owned | 0 | 20 | ||||||
Loan-related fees | 348 | 378 | ||||||
Income from bank-owned life insurance | 482 | 520 | ||||||
| Loan referral fees/interest rate swap revenue | 390 | 703 | ||||||
| Merchant services revenue | 565 | 536 | ||||||
Other | 861 | 919 | ||||||
Total non-interest income | 9,250 | 7,620 | ||||||
Non-interest expense | ||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 15,246 | 15,518 | ||||||
Occupancy expense | 2,052 | 1,948 | ||||||
Equipment expense | 1,477 | 1,319 | ||||||
Advertising expense | 685 | 738 | ||||||
Data processing expense | 2,933 | 3,113 | ||||||
Bank shares tax | 786 | 566 | ||||||
Professional fees | 999 | 1,056 | ||||||
Other operating expenses | 4,737 | 5,424 | ||||||
Total non-interest expense | 28,915 | 29,682 | ||||||
Income before income tax expense | 18,572 | 13,401 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 3,225 | 2,326 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 15,347 | $ | 11,075 | ||||
Earnings per share | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.56 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.56 | ||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.20 | ||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING: | ||||||||
Basic | 20,210,439 | 19,802,095 | ||||||
Diluted | 20,212,187 | 19,807,592 | ||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. |
FNCB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | |||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Interest income | ||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans | $ | 29,821 | $ | 27,993 | $ | 26,568 | ||||||
Interest and dividends on securities: | ||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies | 3,426 | 3,557 | 4,036 | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions, tax-free | 49 | 46 | 109 | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions, taxable | 3,809 | 2,574 | 905 | |||||||||
Other securities | 563 | 545 | 537 | |||||||||
Total interest and dividends on securities | 7,847 | 6,722 | 5,587 | |||||||||
Interest on interest-bearing deposits in other banks | 180 | 33 | 46 | |||||||||
Total interest income | 37,848 | 34,748 | 32,201 | |||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||
Interest on deposits | 3,521 | 2,730 | 2,631 | |||||||||
Interest on borrowed funds: | ||||||||||||
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances | 599 | 595 | 514 | |||||||||
Interest on subordinated debentures | 380 | 625 | 1,450 | |||||||||
Interest on junior subordinated debentures | 300 | 247 | 206 | |||||||||
Total interest on borrowed funds | 1,279 | 1,467 | 2,170 | |||||||||
Total interest expense | 4,800 | 4,197 | 4,801 | |||||||||
Net interest income before provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 33,048 | 30,551 | 27,400 | |||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 769 | 1,153 | (1,345 | ) | ||||||||
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 32,279 | 29,398 | 28,745 | |||||||||
Non-interest income | ||||||||||||
Deposit service charges | 2,903 | 2,892 | 2,960 | |||||||||
Net gain on the sale of available-for-sale securities | 1,597 | 960 | 2,296 | |||||||||
Net gain on the sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 304 | 340 | 292 | |||||||||
Net gain on the sale of SBA guaranteed loans | 79 | 51 | - | |||||||||
Net gain on the sale of other repossessed assets | 47 | - | - | |||||||||
Net gain on the sale of other real estate owned | 79 | 49 | 162 | |||||||||
Loan-related fees | 384 | 439 | 442 | |||||||||
Income from bank-owned life insurance | 527 | 552 | 564 | |||||||||
Other | 1,305 | 920 | 1,084 | |||||||||
Total non-interest income | 7,225 | 6,203 | 7,800 | |||||||||
Non-interest expense | ||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 14,161 | 14,320 | 13,810 | |||||||||
Occupancy expense | 2,105 | 1,777 | 2,284 | |||||||||
Equipment expense | 1,815 | 1,732 | 1,657 | |||||||||
Advertising expense | 623 | 554 | 483 | |||||||||
Data processing expense | 2,023 | 1,997 | 1,976 | |||||||||
Regulatory assessments | 686 | 729 | 950 | |||||||||
Bank shares tax | 800 | 836 | 705 | |||||||||
Expense of other real estate owned | 488 | 409 | 400 | |||||||||
Legal expense | 128 | 362 | 437 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 956 | 961 | 1,014 | |||||||||
Insurance expense | 519 | 516 | 659 | |||||||||
Legal settlements | - | - | 777 | |||||||||
Other losses | 503 | 277 | 281 | |||||||||
Other operating expenses | 3,262 | 3,075 | 3,031 | |||||||||
Total non-interest expense | 28,069 | 27,545 | 28,464 | |||||||||
Income before income tax expense (benefit) | 11,435 | 8,056 | 8,081 | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 11,288 | 1,747 | (27,759 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 147 | $ | 6,309 | $ | 35,840 | ||||||
Earnings per share | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 2.17 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 2.17 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.09 | $ | - | ||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING: | ||||||||||||
Basic | 16,722,966 | 16,571,262 | 16,499,622 | |||||||||
Diluted | 16,740,288 | 16,572,695 | 16,499,622 | |||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 15,347 | $ | 11,075 | ||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale debt securities | 15,349 | 10,842 | ||||||
Taxes | (3,223 | ) | (2,277 | ) | ||||
Net of tax amount | 12,126 | 8,565 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income | (1,528 | ) | (1,227 | ) | ||||
Taxes | 321 | 258 | ||||||
Net of tax amount | (1,207 | ) | (969 | ) | ||||
| Derivative adjustments | (112 | ) | 0 | |||||
| Taxes | 23 | 0 | ||||||
| Net of tax amount | (89 | ) | 0 | |||||
Total other comprehensive income | 10,830 | 7,596 | ||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 26,177 | $ | 18,671 | ||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. |
| |||||||
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 147 | $ | 6,309 | $ | 35,840 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale | 1,752 | (1,312 | ) | 479 | ||||||||
Taxes | (596 | ) | 447 | (163 | ) | |||||||
Net of tax amount | 1,156 | (865 | ) | 316 | ||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income | (1,597 | ) | (960 | ) | (2,296 | ) | ||||||
Taxes | 543 | 326 | 781 | |||||||||
Net of tax amount | (1,054 | ) | (634 | ) | (1,515 | ) | ||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | 102 | (1,499 | ) | (1,199 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 249 | $ | 4,810 | $ | 34,641 | ||||||
|
FNCB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
For the Years Ended December 31, |
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Additional | (Deficit) / | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Common | Common | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Shareholders' | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | Shares | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2014 | 16,484,419 | $ | 20,605 | $ | 61,781 | $ | (32,126 | ) | $ | 1,138 | $ | 51,398 | ||||||||||||
Net income for the year | - | - | - | 35,840 | - | 35,840 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 13,300 | 17 | 52 | - | - | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued under long-term incentive compensation plan | 16,526 | 21 | (21 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards | - | - | 247 | - | - | 247 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $618 | - | - | - | - | (1,199 | ) | (1,199 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2015 | 16,514,245 | $ | 20,643 | $ | 62,059 | $ | 3,714 | $ | (61 | ) | $ | 86,355 | ||||||||||||
Net income for the year | - | - | - | 6,309 | - | 6,309 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared, $0.09 per share | - | - | - | (1,492 | ) | - | (1,492 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued under long-term incentive compensation plan | 52,848 | 66 | (66 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards | - | - | 265 | - | - | 265 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued through dividend reinvestment / optional cash purchase plan | 78,752 | 98 | 335 | - | - | 433 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $773 | - | - | - | - | (1,499 | ) | (1,499 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2016 | 16,645,845 | $ | 20,807 | $ | 62,593 | $ | 8,531 | $ | (1,560 | ) | $ | 90,371 | ||||||||||||
Net income for the year | - | - | - | 147 | - | 147 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared, $0.13 per share | - | - | - | (2,176 | ) | - | (2,176 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued under long-term incentive compensation plan | 46,878 | 58 | (58 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards | - | - | 301 | - | - | 301 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued through dividend reinvestment / optional cash purchase plan | 65,240 | 82 | 374 | (10 | ) | - | 446 | |||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of impact of income tax rate change on unrealized losses on securities available for sale | - | - | - | 287 | (287 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $53 | - | - | - | - | 102 | 102 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2017 | 16,757,963 | $ | 20,947 | $ | 63,210 | $ | 6,779 | $ | (1,745 | ) | $ | 89,191 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Additional | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
of Common | Common | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Shareholders' | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | Shares | Stock | Capital | Earnings | (Loss) Income | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2018 | 16,821,371 | $ | 21,026 | $ | 63,547 | $ | 17,186 | $ | (4,540 | ) | $ | 97,219 | ||||||||||||
Net income | - | 0 | 0 | 11,075 | 0 | 11,075 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid, $0.20 per share | - | 0 | 0 | (4,030 | ) | 0 | (4,030 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Common shares issued for capital raise, net | 3,285,550 | 4,107 | 17,201 | 0 | 0 | 21,308 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards | - | 0 | 255 | 0 | 0 | 255 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Common shares issued under long-term incentive compensation plan | 57,118 | 71 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 150 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued through dividend reinvestment/optional cash purchase plan | 7,369 | 10 | 48 | (24 | ) | 0 | 34 | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $2,019 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7,596 | 7,596 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2019 | 20,171,408 | $ | 25,214 | $ | 81,130 | $ | 24,207 | $ | 3,056 | $ | 133,607 | |||||||||||||
Net income | - | 0 | 0 | 15,347 | 0 | 15,347 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid, $0.22 per share | - | 0 | 0 | (4,447 | ) | 0 | (4,447 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards | - | 0 | 336 | 0 | 0 | 336 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued under long-term incentive compensation plan | 63,970 | 80 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 150 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common shares issued through dividend reinvestment/optional cash purchase plan | 10,271 | 13 | 51 | (27 | ) | 0 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $2,879 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10,830 | 10,830 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2020 | 20,245,649 | $ | 25,307 | $ | 81,587 | $ | 35,080 | $ | 13,886 | $ | 155,860 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. |
FNCB BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES |
For the Year Ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 147 | $ | 6,309 | $ | 35,840 | $ | 15,347 | $ | 11,075 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities amortization, net | 931 | 1,165 | 1,423 | 879 | 746 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in trust | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | (6 | ) | (8 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,516 | 2,604 | 1,703 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation of bank premises and equipment | 1,628 | 1,396 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of loan origination (fees) costs | (626 | ) | 1,591 | |||||||||||||||||
Valuation adjustment for loan servicing rights | (6 | ) | 5 | - | 16 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 769 | 1,153 | (1,345 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 486 | 405 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | 1,941 | 797 | ||||||||||||||||||
Valuation adjustment for off-balance sheet commitments | 133 | (51 | ) | (117 | ) | (90 | ) | 448 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 301 | 265 | 316 | |||||||||||||||||
Net gain on the sale of available-for-sale securities | (1,597 | ) | (960 | ) | (2,296 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net gain on the sale/redemption of available-for-sale debt securities | (1,528 | ) | (1,227 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net gain on equity securities | (1,171 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net gain on the sale of mortgage loans held for sale | (304 | ) | (340 | ) | (292 | ) | (653 | ) | (253 | ) | ||||||||||
Net gain on the sale of other repossessed assets | (47 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on the disposition of bank premises and equipment | 64 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Net gain on the sale of SBA guaranteed loans | (79 | ) | (51 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||
Net gain on the sale of other real estate owned | (79 | ) | (49 | ) | (162 | ) | 0 | (20 | ) | |||||||||||
Valuation adjustment of other real estate owned | 307 | 169 | 208 | 27 | 85 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on the disposition of bank premises and equipment | 0 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on bank-owned life insurance settlement | 0 | (114 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income from bank-owned life insurance | (527 | ) | (552 | ) | (564 | ) | (482 | ) | (520 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 12,737 | 9,817 | 8,210 | 14,510 | 9,900 | |||||||||||||||
Funds used to originate mortgage loans held for sale | (12,932 | ) | (9,390 | ) | (7,998 | ) | (14,903 | ) | (9,887 | ) | ||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in net deferred tax assets | 11,037 | 1,613 | (27,684 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Increase in accrued interest receivable | (477 | ) | (282 | ) | (400 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets | (138 | ) | 496 | 917 | ||||||||||||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable | (1 | ) | (10,923 | ) | 903 | |||||||||||||||
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities | (979 | ) | (558 | ) | (4,195 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Decrease in net deferred tax assets | 3,219 | 2,396 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable | (1,052 | ) | 380 | |||||||||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets | 1,412 | (2,107 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Decrease in accrued interest payable | (150 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | 773 | (354 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments | �� | 11,620 | (5,876 | ) | (31,379 | ) | 4,228 | 3,577 | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 11,767 | 433 | 4,461 | 19,575 | 14,652 | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Maturities, calls and principal payments of securities available for sale | 8,895 | 6,264 | 8,615 | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale | 132,240 | 32,588 | 88,658 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases of securities available for sale | (154,686 | ) | (60,302 | ) | (133,269 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Maturities, calls and principal payments of available-for-sale debt securities | 20,694 | 11,051 | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale/redemption of available-for-sale debt securities | 69,271 | 128,233 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale debt securities | (152,691 | ) | (105,995 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of equity securities | (500 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Redemption (purchase) of the stock in Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh | 558 | 3,033 | (3,541 | ) | 2,059 | (681 | ) | |||||||||||||
Redemption of Federal Reserve Bank stock | - | 1,351 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase in loans to customers | (41,519 | ) | (5,656 | ) | (68,665 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of SBA guaranteed loans | 979 | 1,315 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of other repossessed assets | 280 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale/transfer of equity securities | 1,223 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of equity securities without readily determinable fair values | (500 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans to customers | (70,820 | ) | 7,737 | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned | 870 | 1,928 | 758 | 204 | 821 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds received from bank-owned life insurance settlement | 0 | 419 | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds received from sale of bank premises and equipment | 0 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of bank premises and equipment | (1,093 | ) | (861 | ) | (1,419 | ) | (1,689 | ) | (4,540 | ) | ||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (53,476 | ) | (20,340 | ) | (108,863 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (132,749 | ) | 37,061 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in deposits | (12,691 | ) | 193,593 | 26,210 | ||||||||||||||||
Net (repayment of) proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances - overnight | - | (60,500 | ) | 60,500 | ||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in deposits | 285,739 | (93,920 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
(Repayment of) proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances - overnight | (14,100 | ) | 7,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances - term | 59,804 | 46,915 | 151,300 | 20,000 | 70,000 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances - term | (73,373 | ) | (63,680 | ) | (137,192 | ) | (52,809 | ) | (49,521 | ) | ||||||||||
Principal reduction on subordinated debentures | (5,000 | ) | (4,000 | ) | (11,000 | ) | 0 | (5,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares | 456 | 433 | - | |||||||||||||||||
Discount on optional cash purchase plan | (10 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of discount | 37 | 21,342 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid | (2,176 | ) | (1,492 | ) | - | (4,447 | ) | (4,030 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (32,990 | ) | 111,269 | 89,818 | ||||||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (74,699 | ) | 91,362 | (14,584 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 234,420 | (53,629 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 121,246 | (1,916 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 112,445 | 21,083 | 35,667 | 34,565 | 36,481 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 37,746 | $ | 112,445 | $ | 21,083 | $ | 155,811 | $ | 34,565 | ||||||||||
Supplemental cash flow information | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 4,801 | $ | 15,120 | $ | 3,898 | $ | 6,310 | $ | 9,876 | ||||||||||
Income taxes | 210 | 10 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
Other transactions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Principal balance of loans transferred to other real estate owned | 80 | 1,210 | 3,697 | |||||||||||||||||
Government guarantee receivable on loans transferred to other real estate owned or other assets | - | - | (1,980 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Change in deferred gain on sale of other real estate owned | (7 | ) | (8 | ) | 14 | |||||||||||||||
| Lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets | 387 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investor loans transferred to other real estate owned | 0 | 256 | ||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. ORGANIZATION
FNCB Bancorp, Inc. is a registered bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1997. It is the parent company of FNCB Bank (the “Bank”) and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries FNCB Realty Company, Inc., FNCB Realty Company I, LLC, and FNCB Realty Company II, LLC. Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “FNCB” is used to refer to FNCB Bancorp, Inc., and its subsidiaries. In certain circumstances, however, the term “FNCB” refers to FNCB Bancorp, Inc., itself.
The Bank provides customary retail and commercial banking services to individuals, businesses and businesseslocal governments and municipalities through its 1178 banking full-service branch locations located in northeastern Pennsylvania andwithin its Limited Purpose Banking Office (“LPO”) in Allentown, Lehigh County,primary market area, Northeastern Pennsylvania.
FNCB Realty Company, Inc., FNCB Realty Company I, LLC, and FNCB Realty Company II, LLC, which were formed to hold real estate and/or operate businesses acquired in exchange for debt settlement or foreclosure.
Onforeclosure, were inactive at June 30, 2016,December 31, 2020 First National Community Bancorp, Inc., the parent company of First National Community Bank, announced that following receipt of required regulatory approvals from the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities, First National Community Bank had completed a charter conversion from a national bank to a Pennsylvania state bank and, as a result of the conversion, First National Community Bank changed its legal name to FNCB Bank. Both the charter conversion and legal name change became effective June 30, 2016. 2019.On October 4, 2016, First National Community Bancorp, Inc., the parent company of FNCB Bank, filed an amendment to its articles of incorporation to change its name, effective October 17, 2016, to “FNCB Bancorp, Inc.” The Board of Directors also amended its bylaws, effective October 17, 2016, to reflect the new name.
In December 2006, First National Community Statutory Trust I (“Issuing Trust”), which is wholly owned by FNCB, was formed under Delaware law to provide FNCB with an additional funding source through the issuance of pooled trust preferred securities. FNCB has adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810-10, Consolidation, for the Issuing Trust. Accordingly, the Issuing Trust has not been consolidated with the accounts of FNCB, because FNCB is not the primary beneficiary of the trust.
Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of FNCB are comprised of the accounts of FNCB Bancorp, Inc., theand its wholly-owned subsidiary, FNCB Bank, andas well as the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-companyintercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The accounting and reporting policies of FNCB conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), Regulation S-X and general practices within the banking industry. Prior period amounts have been reclassified when necessary to conform to the current year’s presentation. Such reclassifications did not have a material impact on the operating results or financial position of FNCB.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from thosethose estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in the near term are the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”), securities’ valuation and impairment evaluation, the valuation of other real estate owned (“OREO”), and income taxes.
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash equivalents include cash on hand and amounts due from banks.
Securities
Debt Securities and Equity Securities with Readily Determinable Fair Values
FNCB classifies investmentits investments in debt securities as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale at the time of purchase. InvestmentDebt securities that are classified as held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. InvestmentDebt securities that are classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses recognized as a component of shareholders’shareholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive loss,income (loss), net of tax. Premiums and discountson callable debt securities are amortized or accretedto the earliest call date. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on noncallable debt securities is recognized over the life of the related security as an adjustment to yield using the interest method. Realized gains and losses on sales of investmentdebt securities are based on amortized cost using the specific identification method on the trade date. All of FNCB's debt securities were classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Equity securities with readily determinable fair values are reported at fair value with net unrealized gains and losses recognized in the consolidated statements of income.
Fair values for debt securities and equity securities with readily determinable fair values are based upon quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based upon quoted market prices of comparable instruments, or a discounted cash flow model using market estimates of interest rates and volatility.
Restricted Securities
Investments in restricted securities have limited marketability, are carried at cost and are evaluated for impairment based on FNCB’s determination of the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the stock. FNCB’s investment in restricted securities is comprised of stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and Atlantic Community Bankers Bank.
Equity Securities without Readily Determinable Fair Values
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values generally consist of common and/or preferred stock of privately held financial institutions, which are carried at cost and included in other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition. On a quarterly basis, management performs a qualitative assessment to determine if the securities are impaired. If the qualitative assessment indicates impairment, the security is written down to its fair value, with the charge for impairment included in net income.
Evaluation for Other Than Temporary Impairment
On a quarterly basis, management evaluates each of its investmentall securities classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position for other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”). An individual security is considered impaired when its current fair value is less than its amortized cost basis. As part of its evaluation, management considers the following factors, among other things, in determining whether the security’s impairment is other than temporary:
● | the length of time and extent of the impairment; |
● | the |
● |
|
|
|
● | historical implied |
● |
|
|
● | failure of the issuer to make contractual interest or principal payments in the past; and |
● | changes in the |
|
|
Based on current authoritative guidance, when a held-to-maturity or available-for-sale debt security is assessed for OTTI, management must first consider (a) whether managementit intends to sell the security and (b) whether it is more likely than not thatthe FNCB will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis.cost. If one of these circumstances applies to a security, an OTTI loss is recognized in the statement of income equal to the full amount of the decline in fair value below amortized cost. If neither of these circumstances applies to a security, but FNCB does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost, basis, an OTTI loss has occurred that must be separated into two categories: (a) the amount related to credit loss and (b) the amount related to other factors (such as market risk). In assessing the level of OTTI attributable to credit loss, management compares the present value of cash flows expected to be collected with the amortized cost basis of the security. The portion of the total OTTI related to credit loss is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as estimated based on cash flow projections discounted at the applicable original yield of the security, and is recognized in earnings, while the amount related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. The total OTTI loss is presented in the statement of income less the portion recognized in other comprehensive income. When a debt security becomes other-than-temporarily impaired, its amortized cost basis is reduced to reflect the portion of the total impairment related to credit loss. The assessment of whether an OTTI decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment that is based on information available to management at a point in time.
For equity securities, FNCB evaluates whether or not the unrealized loss is expected to be recovered based on evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the amortized cost basis. If it is probable that the amortized cost basis will not be recovered, taking into consideration the estimated recovery period and ability of FNCB to hold the security until recovery, the entire difference between the security’s cost basis and its fair value is recognized in earnings at the balance sheet date.
Investment in FHLB of Pittsburgh stock has limited marketability, is carried at cost and is evaluated for impairment based on FNCB’s determination of the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the stock. FNCB’s investment in FHLB of Pittsburgh stock totaled $2.8 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Management noted no indicators of impairment for the FHLB of Pittsburgh stock at December 31, 2017.
Loans and Loan Origination Fees and Costs
Loans receivable, other than loans heldthat management has the intent and ability to hold for sale,the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at thetheir outstanding unpaid principal outstanding,balance, net of unamortized deferred loan fees and costs, any unearned income and partial charge-offs andcharge-offs. Loans receivable are presented net of the allowance for loan and lease losses.losses in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Interest income on all loans is recognized using the effective interest method. LoanNonrefundable loan origination and commitment fees, as well as certain direct loan origination costs, are deferred and the net amount is amortized as an adjustment of the related loan’s yield. FNCB generally amortizes these amounts over the contractual life of the related loan.loan as an adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. Amortization of deferred loan fees or costs is discontinued when a loan is placed on non-accrual status.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when a loan is specifically determined to be impaired or when management believes that the collection of interest or principal is doubtful. This generally occurs when a default of interest or principal has existed for 90 days or more, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection, or when management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that the loan would default before 90 days. FNCB determines delinquency status based on the number of days since the date of the borrower’s last required contractual loan payment. When the interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid interest income is reversed and charged back against current earnings. Any subsequent cash payments received are applied, first to the outstanding loan amounts,principal balance, then to the recovery of any previously charged-off loan amounts,principal, with any excess treated as a recovery of lost interest. A non-accrual loan is returned to accrual status when the loan is current as to principal and interest payments, is performing according to contractual terms for six consecutive months and futurefactors indicating reasonable doubt about the timely collection of payments are reasonably assured.no longer exist.
In accordance with federal regulations, prior to making, extending, renewing or advancing additional funds in excess of $$250500 thousand on a loan secured by real estate, FNCB requires an appraisal of the property by an independent, state-certified or state-licensed appraiser (depending upon collateral type and loan amount) that is approved by the Board of Directors. AppraisalsAppraisals are reviewed internally or by an independent third party engaged by FNCB. Generally, management obtains a new appraisal when a loan is deemed impaired. These appraisals may be more limited in scope than those obtained at the initial underwriting of the loan.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
FNCB considers a loan to be a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when it grants a concession to the borrower for legal or economic reasons related to the borrower’sborrower’s financial difficulties that it would not otherwise consider. Such concessions granted generally involve a reduction of the stated interest rate, an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date, a payment modifications,modification under a forbearance agreement, a permanent reduction of the recorded investment in the loan, capitalization of real estate taxes, or a combination of these modifications. Non-accrual TDRs are returned to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are brought current, are performing under the modified terms for six consecutive months, and management believes that collection of the remaining interest and principal is probable.
Loan Impairment
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that FNCB will be unable to collect all amounts due (including principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the note and loan agreement. For purposes of the impairment analysis, all TDRs, loan relationships with an aggregate outstanding balance greater than $100 thousand rated substandard and non-accrual, and loans that are identified as doubtful or loss are considered impaired. Impaired loans are analyzed individually to determine the amount of impairment. For collateral-dependent loans, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral supporting the loans. A loan is considereddetermined to be collateral dependent when repayment of the loan is expected to be provided through the operation or liquidation of the collateral held. For impaired loans that are secured by real estate, external appraisals are generally obtained annually, or more frequently as warranted, to ascertain a fair value so that the impairment analysis can be updated. Should a current appraisal not be available at the time of impairment analysis, other sources of valuation may be used including current letters of intent, broker price opinions or executed agreements of sale. For non-collateral dependent impaired loans, impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, net of any unamortized deferred fees and costs, and discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate.
Generally, all loans with balances of $100$100 thousand or less are considered within homogeneous pools and are not individually evaluated for impairment. However, individual loans with balances of $100$100 thousand or less are individually evaluated for impairment if that loan is part of a larger impaired loan relationship or the loan is a TDR.
Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged-off upon determination that all or a portion of the loan balance is uncollectible and exceeds the fair value of the collateral. A loan is considered uncollectible when the borrower is delinquent with respect to principal or interest repayment and it is unlikely that the borrower will have the ability to pay the debt in a timely manner, collateral value is insufficient to cover the outstanding indebtedness and the guarantors (if applicable) do not provide adequate support for the loan.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Management evaluates the credit quality of FNCB’sFNCB’s loan portfolio on an ongoing basis and performs a formal review of the adequacy of the ALLL on a quarterly basis. The ALLL is established through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings and is maintained at a level that management considers adequate to absorb estimated probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the evaluation date. Loans, or portions of loans, determined by management to be uncollectible are charged off against the ALLL, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the ALLL.
Determining the amount of the ALLL is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, qualitative factors, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. Banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination of FNCB, also review the ALLL, and may require, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, that certain loan balances be charged off or require that adjustments be made to the ALLL. Additionally, the ALLL is determined, in part, by the composition and size of the loan portfolio.
The ALLLFNCB's allowance methodology consists primarily of two components, a specific component and a general component. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For such loans, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers all other loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted forby qualitative factors. The general reserve component of the ALLL is based on pools of unimpaired loans segregated by loan segment and risk rating categories of “Pass”, “Special Mention” or “Substandard and Accruing.” Historical loss factors and various qualitative factors are applied based on the risk profile in each risk rating category to determine the appropriate reserve related to those loans. Substandard loans on nonaccrualnon-accrual status above the $100 thousand loan relationship threshold and all loans considered TDRs are classified as impaired. Based on its evaluation, management may establish an unallocated component for a respective loan segment (as discussed below) whenthat is used to cover any inherent losses that exist as of the actual historical loss experience for that loan segment results in an overall negative historical loss factor.evaluation date, but which may not have been identified under the methodology.
When establishing the ALLL, management categorizes loans into the following loan segments that are based generally on the nature of the collateral and basis of repayment. The risk characteristics of FNCB’sFNCB’s loan segments are as follows:
Construction, Land Acquisition and Development Loans - These loans consist of loans secured by real estate, with the purpose of constructing one- to four-family homes, residential developments and various commercial properties including shopping centers, office complexes and single-purpose, owner-occupied structures. Additionally, loans in this category include loans for land acquisition, secured by raw land. FNCB’s construction program offers either short-term, interest-only loans that require the borrower to pay only interest during the construction phase with a balloon payment of the principal outstanding at the end of the construction period or only interest during construction with a conversion to amortizing principal and interest when the construction is complete. Loans for undeveloped real estate are subject to a loan-to-value ratio not to exceed 65%. Construction loans are treated similarly to the developed real estate loans and are subject to a maximum loan to value ratio of 85% based upon an “as-completed” appraised value. Construction loans generally yield a higher interest rate than other mortgage loans but also carry more risk.
Commercial Real Estate Loans - These loans represent the largest portion of FNCB’s total loan portfolio and loans in this portfolio generally carry larger loan balances. The commercial real estate mortgage loan portfolio consists of owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied properties that are secured by a broad range of real estate, including but not limited to, office complexes, shopping centers, hotels, warehouses, gas stations, convenience markets, residential care facilities, nursing care facilities, restaurants and multifamily housing. FNCB offers commercial real estate loans at various rates and terms that do not exceed 25 years. These types of loans are subject to specific loan-to-value guidelines prior to the time of closing. The policy limits for developed real estate loans are subject to a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 85%. Commercial mortgage loans must also meet specific criteria that include the capacity, capital, credit worthiness and cash flow of the borrower and the project being financed. Potential borrower(s) and guarantor(s) are required to provide FNCB with historical and current financial data. As part of the underwriting process for commercial real estate loans, management performs a review of the cash flow analysis of the borrower(s), guarantor(s) and the project in addition to considering the borrower’s expertise, credit history, net worth and the value of the underlying property.
Commercial and Industrial Loans- FNCB offers commercial loans at various rates and terms to businesses located in its primary market area. The commercial loan portfolio includes revolving lines of credit, automobile floor plans, equipment loans, vehicle loans, improvement loans and term loans. These loans generally carry a higher risk than commercial real estate loans by the nature of the underlying collateral, which can be machinery and equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, vehicles or marketable securities. Generally, a collateral lien is placed on the collateral supporting the loan. In order to reduce the risk associated with these loans, management may attempt to secure real estate as collateral and obtain personal guarantees of the borrower as deemed necessary.
State and Political Subdivision Loans - FNCB originates general obligation notes and tax anticipation loans to state and political subdivisions, which are primarily municipalities in FNCB’s market area.
Residential Real Estate Loans - FNCB offers fixed- and variable-ratefixed-rate one1- to four4-family family residential loans. Residential first lien mortgages are generally subject to an 80% loan to value ratio based on the appraised value of the property. FNCB will generally require the mortgagee to purchase Private Mortgage Insurance if the amount of the loan exceeds the 80% loan to value ratio. Residential mortgage loans are generally smaller in size and are considered homogeneous as they exhibit similar characteristics. FNCB may sell loans and retain servicing when warranted by market conditions.
Consumer Loans – FNCB offers both secured and unsecured installment loans, personal lines of credit and overdraft protection loans. FNCB is in the business of underwriting indirect auto loans which are originated through various auto dealers in northeastern Pennsylvania and dealer floor plan loans. FNCB offers home equity loans and home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”) with a maximum combined loan-to-value ratio of 90% based on the appraised value of the property. Home equity loans have fixed rates of interest and carry terms up to 15 years. HELOCs have adjustable interest rates and are based upon the national prime interest rate. Residential mortgage loans, including home equity loans, are generally smaller in size and are considered homogeneous as they exhibit similar characteristics.
Consumer Loans – FNCB offers both secured and unsecured installment loans, personal lines of credit and overdraft protection loans. FNCB is in the business of underwriting indirect auto loans which are originated through various auto dealers in northeastern Pennsylvania and dealer floor plan loans. Consumer loans are generally smaller in size and exhibit homogeneous characteristics.
Off-Balance-Sheet Credit-Related Financial Instruments
FNCB is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing need of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, unused portions of lines of credit, including revolving HELOCs, and letters of credit. FNCB’sFNCB’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument is represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. FNCB uses the same credit policies in making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. In order to provide for probable losses inherent in these instruments, FNCB records a reserve for unfunded commitments, included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition, with the offsetting expense recorded in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income.
Mortgage Banking Activities, Loan Sales and Loan Servicing
Mortgage loans originated and intendedheld for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value determined on an individual loan basis. Net unrealized losses are recorded as a valuation allowance and charged to earnings. Gains and losses on sales of mortgage loans are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loan sold and include the value assigned to the rights to service the loan.
FNCB may also elect to sell the guaranteed principal balance of loans that are guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and retain the servicing on those loans. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, FNCB sold the guaranteed principal balance of loans totaling $900 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively. There were no sales of SBA guaranteed loans during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Servicing rights are recorded at fair value upon sale of the loan and reported in other assets on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period during which estimated servicing income will be received.
Fair value is based on market prices for comparable servicing contracts, when available, or alternately, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
Servicing rights are evaluated for impairment at each reporting date based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into tranches based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type and investor type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual tranche, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the tranche. If management later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, a reduction of the allowance may be recorded as an increase to income.
Other Real Estate Owned
OREO consists of property acquired by foreclosure, abandonment or conveyance of deed in-lieu of foreclosure of a loan, and bank premises that are no longer used for operationoperations or for future expansion. OREO is held for sale and is initially recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell at the date of acquisition or transfer, which establishes a new cost basis. Upon acquisition of the property through foreclosure or deed in-lieu of foreclosure, any adjustment to fair value less estimated selling costs is recorded to the ALLL. The determination is made on an individual asset basis. Bank premises no longer used for operations or future expansion are transferred to OREO at fair value less estimated selling costs with any related write-down included in non-interest expense. Subsequent to acquisition, valuations are periodically performed, and the assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated cost to sell. Fair value is determined through external appraisals, current letters of intent, broker price opinions or executed agreements of sale, unless management determines that conditions exist that warrant an adjustment to the value. Costs relating to the development and improvement of the OREO properties may be capitalized; holding period costs and any subsequent changes to the valuation allowance are charged to expense as incurred.
Bank Premises and Equipment
Land is stated at cost. Bank premises, equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Costs for routine maintenance and repairsrepairs are expensed as incurred, while significant expenditures for improvements are capitalized. Depreciation expense is computed generally using the straight-line method over the following ranges of estimated useful lives, or in the case of leasehold improvements, to the expected terms of the leases, if shorter:
Buildings and improvements (years) | 5 | to | 40 |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment (years) | 3 | to | 20 |
Leasehold improvements (years) | 3 | to | 35 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
|
Long-lived Assets
Intangible assets and bank premises and equipment are reviewed by management at least annually for potential impairment and whenever events or circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
Income Taxes
FNCB recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
FNCB files a consolidated Federalfederal income tax return. Under tax sharing agreements, each subsidiary provides for and settles income taxes with FNCB as if it would have filed on a separate return basis. Interest and penalties, if any, as a result of a taxing authority examination are recognized within non-interest expense. FNCB is not currently subject to an audit by any of its tax authorities and with limited exception is no longer subject to federal and state income tax examinations by taxing authorities for years before 2014.2017.
When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Management determined that FNCB had no0 liabilities for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
Earnings per Share
Earnings per share is calculated on the basis of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Potential common shares that may be issued by FNCB relate to outstanding stock options and shares of unvested restricted stock for which the dilutive effect is calculated using the treasury stock method.
Stock-Based Compensation
FNCB is required to measure and recordrecognizes all share-based payments for compensation expense for stock-based paymentsin the consolidated statements of income based on the instrument’stheir fair valuevalues on the date of the grant. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.date. The fair value of shares of unrestricted and restricted stock and awarded under the Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (“LTIP”) is determined using an average of the high and low prices for FNCB’s common stock for the 10 days preceding the grant date. The fair value of shares ofStock-based compensation expense for unrestricted stock granted under Employee Stock Grant Plans is determined using the closing price of FNCB’s common stockrecognized on the grant date. Stock-basedFor restricted stock, stock-based compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock is recognized ratably over the vesting period,, adjusted for forfeitures during the period in which they occur. Stock-based compensation expense for shares of stock awarded under the Employee Stock Grant Plans is recognized on the grant date.occur.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
Bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) represents the cash surrender value of life insurance policies on certain current and former directors and officers of FNCB. FNCB purchased the insurance as a tax-deferred investment and future source of funding for liabilities, including the payment of employee benefits such as health care. BOLI is carried in the consolidated statements of financial condition at its cash surrender value. Increases in the cash value of the policies, as well as proceeds received, are recorded in non-interest income. Under some of these policies, the beneficiaries receive a portion of the death benefit. The net present value of the future death benefits scheduled to be paid to the beneficiaries was $108$116 thousand and $105$113 thousand at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, and is reflected in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Fair Value Measurement
FNCB uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain financial assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Available-for-sale debt securities and derivative contracts are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, FNCB may be required to recognize adjustments to other assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as impaired loans, other securities, and OREO.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets or liabilities;liabilities; it is not a forced transaction.
Accounting standards define fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value, establish a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and provide disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
● | Level 1 valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted market prices for identical instruments traded in active |
● | Level 2 valuation is based upon quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by market data; and |
● | Level 3 valuation is derived from other valuation methodologies including discounted cash flow models and similar techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in determining fair value. |
Revenue Recognition
FNCB recognizes revenues as they are earned based on contractual terms, as transactions occur, or as services are provided and collectability is reasonably assured. FNCB's primary source of revenue is interest income from the Bank's loans and investment securities, which is recognized on the accrual basis primarily on terms in written contracts such as loan agreements or securities contracts. FNCB also earns non-interest income from various banking services offered by the Bank as follows:
● | Deposit service charges - include general service fees for monthly account maintenance, account analysis fees, non-sufficient funds fees, wire transfer fees and other deposit account related fees. Revenue is recognized when FNCB’s performance obligation is completed which is generally monthly for account maintenance services or when a transaction has been completed (such as a wire transfer). Payment for service charges on deposit accounts is received immediately or in the following month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. Also included in deposit service charges is income from ATM surcharges and debit card services income. ATM surcharges are generated when an FNCB cardholder uses an ATM that is not within the AllPoint ATM network or a non-FNCB cardholder uses an FNCB ATM. Card services income is primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever a customer uses an FNCB debit card as payment for goods and/or services through a card payment network such as Mastercard®/Visa®. FNCB’s performance obligation is satisfied on a daily basis as transactions are processed. FNCB recognizes ATM surcharges and card services income as transactions with merchants are settled, generally on a daily basis. |
● | Net gains on the sale of other real estate owned - FNCB records a gain or loss from the sale of OREO when control of the property transfers to the buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed. When FNCB finances the sale of OREO to the buyer, FNCB assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the contract and whether collectability of the transaction price is probable. Once these criteria are met, the OREO asset is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon the transfer of control of the property to the buyer. In determining the gain or loss on the sale, FNCB adjusts the transaction prices and related gain (loss) on sale if a significant financing component is present. |
| ● | Loan referral fees/interest rate swap revenue - Loan referral fees represent fees FNCB receives from a third-party correspondent bank for referring certain qualified borrowers to their proprietary loan participation swap program. Interest rate swap revenue represent net fees FNCB receives from a counterparty for completing the swap transaction with the counterparty directly. FNCB receives both types of fees at the time the loan closes. The fees are non-refundable and are not tied to the loan and FNCB has no future obligations to the correspondent under the participation agreement related to such fees. FNCB records referral fees/interest rate swap revenue in non-interest income upon receipt. | |
● | Other income – primarily includes wealth management fee income, merchant services fee income and title insurance revenue. Wealth management fee income represents fees received from a third-party broker-dealer as part of a revenue-sharing agreement for fees earned from customers that we refer to the third party. Merchant services fees represent commissions received from the major payment networks such as VISA®/Mastercard® on activity generated by customers on their merchant account. Wealth management and merchant services fee income are transactional in nature and are recognized in income monthly when FNCB’s performance obligation is complete, which is generally the time that payment is received. With regard to title insurance revenue, FNCB is a member in a limited liability company that provides title insurance services to customers referred by member financial institutions. In accordance with an operating agreement, the title insurance company makes quarterly discretionary distributions to member institutions on a pro-rata basis based on their respective membership interest percentage at the time of distribution. FNCB’s performance obligation under the operating agreement was satisfied with its capital contribution. There are no future minimum referral quotas required under the operating agreement. FNCB records revenue from quarterly distributions at the time of receipt. |
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the shareholders’shareholders’ equity section of the statement of financial condition, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.
New Authoritative Accounting Guidance
ASUAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 20162020-09,04, Compensation – Stock CompensationReference Rate Reform (Topic 718848): “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” simplifies several aspects“Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting,” provides optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for share-based payment(or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. It provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, forfeitures, and classification on the statement of cash flows.affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in ASU 20162020-0904 were effective upon issuance. On January 7, 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) that clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions provided for in ASU 2020-04 also apply to derivatives that do not reference a rate that is being discontinued but otherwise are affected by reference rate reform. ASU 2021-01 clarifies that changes in the interest rates used for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment for derivative instruments that are being implemented as part of the market-wide transition to new reference rates, commonly referred to as the "discounting transition," are within the scope of Topic 848. ASU 2021-01 was effective for annual periods,upon issuance. As part of its overall evaluation of reference rate reform, management is still evaluating the impact that LIBOR replacement will have on FNCB's operating results and interim periods within those annual periods, beginningfinancial position. Any such impacts will be prospective in nature and may affect net interest income and fair value estimates after December 15, 2016 for public entities.the effective date of such rate replacement. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2017 didLIBOR replacement is not expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of FNCB.
ASU 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): “Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” permits a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the reduction in the corporate income tax rate to 21.0% with the newly enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018; however, FNCB chose to early adopt the new standard for the year ended December 31, 2017, as allowed under the new standard. The amount of the reclassification for FNCB was $287 thousand, which is included in the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity.
Accounting Guidance to be Adopted in Future Periods
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Section A, “Summary and Amendments That Create Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Other Assets and Deferred Costs-Contract with Customers (Subtopic 340-40);” Section B, “Conforming Amendments to Other Topics and Subtopics in the Codification and Status Tables;” and Section C, “Background Information and Basis for Conclusions,” provides a robust framework for addressing revenue recognition issues, and upon its effective date, replaces almost all existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry specific guidance, in current GAAP. On August 12, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): “Deferral of the Effective Date,” which defers the adoption of ASU 2014-09 until the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflect the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance provides steps to follow to achieve the core principle. ASU 2014-09 will also result in enhanced interim and annual disclosures, both qualitative and quantitative, about revenue in order to help financial statement users understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and related cash flows. FNCB adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018. The guidance allows an entity to apply the new standard either retrospectively or through a cumulative effect adjustment as of January 1, 2018. Management conducted an in-depth assessment of FNCB’s revenue streams using the five-step, contract-based approach to determine whether or not the revenue stream falls within the scope of this new guidance. FNCB’s largest revenue stream, net interest income, is explicitly excluded from the scope of ASU 2014-09. Deposit-related service charges, interchange income and gains and losses from the sales of foreclosed real estate are revenue streams that fall within the scope of ASU 2014-09. Management reviewed FNCB’s current policies and practices for these revenue streams to identify any differences with the new guidance and concluded that no change in accounting treatment is required. FNCB has elected to implement the new guidance using the modified retrospective application, with the cumulative effect recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings upon adoption on January 1, 2018. Due to immateriality, FNCB will have no cumulative effect adjustment to record. Management is still finalizing any required changes to the related disclosures.
ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” requires all equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee). The amendments in this ASU also require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. In addition, this ASU eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities and the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet for public business entities. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 for public entities. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2018 did not have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of FNCB.
ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842): “Leases” will require organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by the lessee will primarily depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, the new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 will also require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The new disclosures will include both qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. ASU 2016-02 is effective with fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018 for public entities. FNCB currently leases fourteen of its offices. FNCB will adopt this new guidance on January 1, 2019, and is currently evaluating the effect this guidance may have on its operating results and financial position.
ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” replaces the current loss impairment methodology under GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to form credit loss estimates in an effort to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit. Specifically, the amendments in this ASU2016-13 is commonly referred to as Current Expected Credit Losses ("CECL") and will require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The amendments in this update affect entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income, including such financial assets as loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance-sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. On June 17, 2016, the four, federal financial institution regulatory agencies (the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency), issued a joint statement to provide information about ASU 2016-13 and the initial supervisory views regarding the implementation of the new standard. The joint statement applies to all banks, savings associations, credit unions and financial institution holding companies, regardless of asset size. The statement details the key elements of, and the steps necessary for, the successful transition to the new accounting standard. In addition, the statement notifies financial institutions that because the appropriate allowance levels are institution-specific amounts, the agencies will not establish benchmark targets or ranges for the change in institutions’ allowance levels upon adoption of the ASU, or for allowance levels going forward. Due to the importance of ASU 2016-13, the agencies encourage financial institutions to begin planning and preparing for the transition and state that senior management, under the oversight of the board of directors, should work closely with staff in their accounting, lending, credit risk management, internal audit, and information technology functions during the transition period leading up to, and well after, adoption. ASU 2016-13 iswas originally effective for public business entities that are registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filersunder the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including smaller reporting companies, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. All entities may adopt the amendments in this ASU earlier as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Accordingly, On November 15, 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2019-10, "Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates," which finalized various effective dates delay for private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and certain smaller reporting companies. Specifically, under ASU 2019-10 the effective date for implementation of CECL for smaller reporting companies, private companies and not-for-profits was extended to fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2022. FNCB is a smaller reporting company, and accordingly, will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2020.2023. FNCB has created a Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”)CECL task group comprised of members of its finance, credit administration, lending, internal audit, loan operations and information systems units. The CECL task group has become familiar withunderstands the provisions of ASU 2016-13 and is currently in the process of planning and preparing for the transition toimplementing the new guidance, which includes, but is not limited to: (1) developing an appropriate course of action for FNCB taking into consideration the nature, scope, and risk of its lending and investing activities; (2) identifying segments and sub-segments within the loan portfolio that have similar risk characteristics; (2) determining the appropriate methodology for each segment; (3) reviewing the existing allowance and credit risk management practices to identify processes that may be leveraged when applying the new guidance; (4) identifying data needs and implementing changes that are necessary to its core operating system and interfaces to be able to capture appropriate data requirements; and (54) evaluating qualitative factors and economic to develop appropriate forecasts for integration into the model. FNCB is currently evaluating the effect this guidance may have on FNCB’sits operating results and/or financial position, including assessing any potential impact on its capital.
ASU 20162020-15,01 Statement of Cash FlowsInvestments - Investments-Equity Securities (Topic 230321): “Classification, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The new guidance addresses accounting for the transition into and out of Certain Cash Receiptsthe equity method and Cash Payments,” provides guidance onmeasuring certain purchase options and forward contracts to acquire investments. If a company is applying the measurement alternative for an equity investment under ASC eight321 specific cash flow issues in order to reduce current and potential future diversity in reporting. The specific cash flow items addressed include debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relationmust transition to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies, distributions received from equity method, investees, beneficial interest in securitization transactions,or if applying the equity method and separately identifiable cash flows and applicationmust transition to ASC 321; because of an observable transaction, it will remeasure its investment immediately before transition. If a company holds certain non-derivative forward contracts or purchased call options to acquire equity securities, such instruments generally will be measured using the predominance principle.fair value principles of ASC 321 before settlement or exercise. ASU 20162020-15 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2016-15 is effective for all entities that are required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 320, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2018 did not have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of FNCB.
ASU 2017-08, Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Topic 310): “Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities” requires that the amortization period for certain callable debt securities be shortened to the earliest call date. The amortization of callable securities held at a discount is not affected. ASU 2017-0801 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 20182020 for public business entities, and for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021 for all other entities. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 20192022 is not expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of FNCB.
ASU
Note 3. RESTRICTED CASH BALANCES
On March 26, 2020, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System eliminated the reserve requirement for all depository institutions. Prior to this date, FNCB iswas required to maintain certain average reserve balances as established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The amount of thoserequired reserve balances for the reserve computation periods which includedbalance was $1.6million at December 31, 2019, 2017 and 2016 were $1.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively. FNCBwhich was satisfied the required reserve balances through the restriction of vault cash and deposits maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank.
In addition, FNCB maintains compensating balances at correspondent banks, most of which are not required, but are used to offset specific charges for services. At December 31, 2020 2017and 2016,2019, the amount of these balances was $114 thousandwere $4.5million and $133 thousand,$1.2 million, respectively.
Note 4. SECURITIES
During the third quarter of 2017, management identified two subordinated notes issued by other financial institutions in the amount of $1.0 million each and $1.0 million in mandatory-redeemable preferred stock of a subsidiary of another financial institution that were included in loans receivable at December 31, 2016 and 2015. Management determined that these financial instruments are in fact securities and upon identification reclassified the recorded investment in these instruments of $3.0 million from loans receivable to available-for-sale securities. Management also conducted an assessment of materiality of the reclassification to determine if FNCB’s previously-issued consolidated financial statements should be amended. Based on its qualitative and quantitative assessment of materiality, management determined that the reclassification did not have a material impact to FNCB’s financial position or results of operations as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, including the interim periods within those years. In addition, the reclassification did not have a material impact to FNCB’s financial position or results of operations as of and for the interim periods ended March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017. Accordingly, management concluded that FNCB’s previously-issued consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements could still be relied upon. However, management has elected to correct the error in these current-period consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements by adjusting the prior-period information for comparability. Management engaged an independent third party to conduct a valuation of and provide fair values for these available-for-sale securities as of September 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and for each quarterly period-end of 2017 and 2016. Based on the valuations, management adjusted these available-for-sale securities to fair value at December 31, 2016 and 2015 and each of the quarter-end periods of 2017 and 2016. Specifically, these reclassifications and valuations resulted in the following adjustments to balances included in previously-issued consolidated statements of financial position at December 31, 2016 and 2015 of: 1) increases to securities available for sale of $3.3 million, or 1.22%, and $3.3 million, or 1.29%;2) decreases to loans, net of the allowance for loan and lease losses of $3.0 million, or 0.41%, for both period ends; 3) increases to total capital, specifically accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income taxes, of $224 thousand, or 0.25%, and $178 thousand, or 0.21%; and 4) decreases to net deferred tax assets of $115 thousand, or 0.43%, and $91 thousand, or 0.32%, respectively. Adjustments to these balances at each of the quarter-end periods of 2017 and 2016 were comparable to those made at December 31, 2016 and 2015, which management has deemed to be immaterial. These reclassifications and valuations had no effect on the consolidated statements of income, the consolidated statements of cash flows, or on earnings per share for the annual and interim periods of 2016 and interim periods of 2017.Debt Securities
The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and the fair value of the FNCB’s available-for-sale debt securities at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Holding | Holding | Fair | Amortized | Holding | Holding | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 146,812 | 567 | 1,380 | 145,999 | $ | 192,851 | $ | 13,012 | $ | 35 | $ | 205,828 | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | 36,100 | 73 | 516 | 35,657 | 54,091 | 2,940 | 59 | 56,972 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | 76,396 | - | 978 | 75,418 | 3,721 | 183 | 0 | 3,904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 22,254 | 174 | 117 | 22,311 | 12,452 | 588 | 14 | 13,026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | 37,926 | 352 | 79 | 38,199 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 4,000 | 58 | - | 4,058 | 23,800 | 790 | 10 | 24,580 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 3,100 | 3 | 17 | 3,086 | 7,505 | 46 | 25 | 7,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | 2,924 | 6 | - | 2,930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 1,010 | - | 82 | 928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 292,596 | $ | 881 | $ | 3,090 | $ | 290,387 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale debt securities | $ | 332,346 | $ | 17,911 | $ | 222 | $ | 350,035 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Holding | Holding | Fair | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | $ | 12,152 | $ | 36 | $ | - | $ | 12,188 | ||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 119,919 | 257 | 2,303 | 117,873 | ||||||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | 17,969 | 155 | 40 | 18,084 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | 100,064 | 154 | 868 | 99,350 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 20,593 | 159 | 176 | 20,576 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 3,500 | 339 | 47 | 3,792 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | 3,172 | 44 | - | 3,216 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities | 1,010 | - | 74 | 936 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 278,379 | $ | 1,144 | $ | 3,508 | $ | 276,015 | ||||||||
December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Holding | Holding | Fair | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities: | ||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | $ | 115,428 | $ | 2,694 | $ | 359 | $ | 117,763 | ||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | 79,606 | 780 | 92 | 80,294 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | 17,414 | 320 | 11 | 17,723 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 18,142 | 343 | 0 | 18,485 | ||||||||||||
| Private collateralized mortgage obligations | 25,069 | 49 | 43 | 25,075 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 7,000 | 182 | 0 | 7,182 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 5,618 | 4 | 1 | 5,621 | ||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | 694 | 2 | 0 | 696 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale debt securities | $ | 268,971 | $ | 4,374 | $ | 506 | $ | 272,839 | ||||||||
Except for securities of U.S. government and government-sponsored agencies, there were no securities of any individual issuer that exceeded 10.0% of shareholders’ equity at December 31, 20172020 or 2016.2019.
The following table presents the maturity information of FNCB’s available-for-sale debt securities at December 31, 2017.2020. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturity because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Because collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities are not due at a single maturity date, they are not included in the maturity categories in the following maturity summary.
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | Available-for-Sale | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | ||||||||||||
Amounts maturing in: | ||||||||||||||||
One year or less | $ | 496 | $ | 496 | $ | 4,663 | $ | 4,718 | ||||||||
One year through five years | 38,998 | 38,949 | ||||||||||||||
After one year through five years | 61,851 | 66,433 | ||||||||||||||
After five years through ten years | 114,242 | 113,542 | 44,805 | 47,397 | ||||||||||||
After ten years | - | - | 105,332 | 111,860 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 3,100 | 3,086 | 7,505 | 7,526 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | 112,496 | 111,075 | 95,738 | 99,075 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 22,254 | 22,311 | 12,452 | 13,026 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 291,586 | $ | 289,459 | $ | 332,346 | $ | 350,035 | ||||||||
The following table presents the gross proceeds received and gross realized gains and losses on sales and redemptionsredemption of available-for-sale debt securities for each of thethree years ended December 31, 2017,2020 2016and 20152019.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Available-for-sale: | ||||||||||||
| Gross proceeds received on sales | $ | 132,240 | $ | 32,588 | $ | 88,658 | ||||||
| Gross proceeds received on redemptions | 1,500 | - | - | |||||||||
| Gross realized gains | 1,673 | 960 | 2,325 | |||||||||
| Gross realized losses | (76 | ) | - | (29 | ) | |||||||
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities: | ||||||||
Gross proceeds received on sales | $ | 68,256 | $ | 128,233 | ||||
| Gross proceeds received on redemption | 1,015 | 0 | ||||||
Gross realized gains on sales | 1,686 | 1,257 | ||||||
| Gross realized losses on sales | (173 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||
| Gross realized gain on redemption | 15 | 0 | ||||||
The following tables present the number of, fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2020 2017and 2016,2019, aggregated by investment category and length of time the securities have been in an unrealized loss position.
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Gross | Number | Gross | Number | Gross | Number | Gross | Number | Gross | Number | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of | Fair | Unrealized | of | Fair | Unrealized | of | Fair | Unrealized | of | Fair | Unrealized | of | Fair | Unrealized | of | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | - | $ | - | $ | - | - | $ | - | $ | - | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and policitical subdivisions | 56 | 65,056 | 497 | 26 | 24,595 | 883 | 82 | 89,651 | 1,380 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 6 | $ | 4,541 | $ | 35 | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | 6 | $ | 4,541 | $ | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | 10 | 24,686 | 516 | 1 | 53 | - | 11 | 24,739 | 516 | 2 | 7,019 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7,019 | 59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | 22 | 64,344 | 672 | 2 | 10,076 | 306 | 24 | 74,420 | 978 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 4 | 8,454 | 56 | 2 | 2,058 | 61 | 6 | 10,512 | 117 | 1 | 2,103 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2,103 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Private collateralized mortgage obligations | 3 | 7,857 | 42 | 1 | 2,256 | 37 | 4 | 10,113 | 79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 1,739 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1,739 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 1 | 2,443 | 17 | - | - | - | 1 | 2,443 | 17 | 2 | 746 | 13 | 1 | 1,591 | 12 | 3 | 2,337 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | 1 | 247 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 247 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | - | - | - | 1 | 918 | 82 | 1 | 918 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 94 | $ | 165,230 | $ | 1,758 | 32 | $ | 37,700 | $ | 1,332 | 126 | $ | 202,930 | $ | 3,090 | 16 | $ | 24,005 | $ | 173 | 2 | $ | 3,847 | $ | 49 | 18 | $ | 27,852 | $ | 222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Gross | Number | Gross | Number | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of | Fair | Unrealized | of | Fair | Unrealized | of | Fair | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | - | $ | - | $ | - | - | $ | - | $ | - | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and policitical subdivisions | 82 | 88,479 | 2,303 | - | - | - | 82 | 88,479 | 2,303 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | 2 | 4,514 | 40 | 1 | 175 | - | 3 | 4,689 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | 17 | 70,146 | 868 | - | - | - | 17 | 70,146 | 868 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 5 | 6,495 | 176 | - | - | - | 5 | 6,495 | 176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | - | - | - | 1 | 453 | 47 | 1 | 453 | 47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | - | - | - | 1 | 926 | 74 | 1 | 926 | 74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 106 | $ | 169,634 | $ | 3,387 | 3 | $ | 1,554 | $ | 121 | 109 | $ | 171,188 | $ | 3,508 | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Gross | Number | Gross | Number | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of | Fair | Unrealized | of | Fair | Unrealized | of | Fair | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | Securities | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 10 | $ | 19,436 | $ | 359 | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | 10 | $ | 19,436 | $ | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | 4 | 19,934 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 19,934 | 92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | 1 | 2,500 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2,500 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | 4 | 18,990 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 18,990 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 2 | 888 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 888 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 21 | $ | 61,748 | $ | 506 | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | 21 | $ | 61,748 | $ | 506 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Management evaluates individual securities in an unrealized loss position quarterly for OTTI. As part of its evaluation, management considers, among other things, the length of time a security’s fair value is less than its amortized cost, the severity of decline, any credit deterioration of the issuer, whether or not management intends to sell the security, and whether it is more likely than not that FNCB will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost.
There were 126 securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2017, including 41 securities issued by a U.S. government or government-sponsored agency, 82 obligations of state and political subdivisions, one asset-backed security, one negotiable certificate of deposit and one equity security. Management performed a review of all securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 20172020 and determined that movements in the fair values of the securities were consistent with the changechanges in market interest rates.rates or market disruption stemming from the COVID-19 global pandemic. In addition, as part of its review, management noted that there was no material change in the credit quality of any of the issuers or any other event or circumstance that may cause a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these securities. Moreover, to date, FNCB has received all scheduled principal and interest payments and expects to fully collect all future contractual principal and interest payments on all securities in anunrealized loss position at December 31, 2017.2020. FNCB does not intend to sell the securities, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell the securities, prior to recovery of their amortized cost. Based on the results of its review and considering the attributes of these debt and equity securities, management concluded that the individual unrealized losses were temporary and OTTI did not exist at December 31, 2017.2020.
Investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh stock has limited marketabilityEquity Securities and is carried at cost. FNCB’s investment in FHLB of Pittsburgh stock totaled $2.8 million and $3.3 million atEquity Securities without Readily Determinable Fair Value
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, FNCB purchased a 4.9% interest inowned 201,000 shares of the common stock of a privately-held bank holding company for $1.7 million.company. The common stock was purchased during 2017 for $8.25 per share, or $1.7 million in aggregate, as part of a private placement pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended for offerings not involving any public offering. The common stock isof this bank holding company was not currently traded on any established market, and is not expected to be traded in the near future on any securities exchange or established over-the-counter market. FNCB has elected to accounthad accounted for this transaction as an investment in an equity security without a readily determinable fair value. AnThe $1.7 million investment was included in other assets at December 31, 2019.
On September 15, 2020, FNCB purchased 20,000 shares of the fixed-rate non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock of another publicly traded bank holding company pursuant to an underwritten public offering at an offering price of $25.00 per share or $500 thousand in aggregate. The preferred stock, which trades on Nasdaq, pays a quarterly dividend rate of 7.50%. Also included in equity securities at December 31, 2020 and 2019, was a $1.0 million investment in a mutual fund comprised of 1-4 family residential mortgage-backed securities collateralized by properties within FNCB's market area.
Equity securities held by FNCB with a readily determinable fair value are reported at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition with unrealized gains and losses recognized in non-interest income in the consolidated statements of income. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, equity securities had a cost basis of $2.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The fair value of equity securities was $3.0 million at December 31, 2020 and $0.9 million at December 31, 2019.
The following table presents unrealized and realized gains and losses recognized in net income on equity securities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Net gain recognized on equity securities | $ | 1,171 | $ | 29 | ||||
Less: net gains recognized on equity securities sold/acquired | 611 | 0 | ||||||
Unrealized gain recognized on equity securities held | $ | 560 | $ | 29 | ||||
Restricted Securities
The following table presents FNCB's investment in restricted securities at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Restricted securities have limited marketability and are carried at cost.
December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh | $ | 1,735 | $ | 3,794 | ||||
Stock in Atlantic Community Bankers Bank | 10 | 10 | ||||||
Total restricted securities, at cost | $ | 1,745 | $ | 3,804 | ||||
Management noted no indicators of impairment for the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") of Pittsburgh or Atlantic Community Bankers Bank stock at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Note 5. LOANS
The following table summarizes loans receivable, net, by category at December 31, 2020 2017and 2016:2019:
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 158,020 | $ | 144,260 | $ | 196,328 | $ | 187,863 | ||||||||
Commercial real estate | 261,783 | 243,830 | 273,903 | 278,379 | ||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 20,981 | 18,357 | 59,785 | 47,484 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 150,103 | 150,758 | 238,435 | 147,623 | ||||||||||||
Consumer | 134,653 | 127,844 | 85,881 | 121,099 | ||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 42,529 | 43,709 | 49,009 | 43,908 | ||||||||||||
Total loans, gross | 768,069 | 728,758 | 903,341 | 826,356 | ||||||||||||
Unearned income | (80 | ) | (48 | ) | (110 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||||||
Net deferred loan costs | 2,654 | 2,569 | ||||||||||||||
Net deferred loan (fees) costs | (2,129 | ) | 2,192 | |||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses | (9,034 | ) | (8,419 | ) | (11,950 | ) | (8,950 | ) | ||||||||
Loans, net | $ | 761,609 | $ | 722,860 | $ | 889,152 | $ | 819,529 | ||||||||
FNCB has granted loans, letters of credit and lines of credit to certain of its executive officers and directors as well as to certain of their related parties. For more information about related party transactions, refer to Note 11,12, “Related Party Transactions” to these consolidated financial statements.
For information about credit concentrations within FNCB’s loan portfolio, refer to Note 12,13, “Commitments, Contingencies and Concentrations” to these consolidated financial statements.
FNCB originates one1- to four4-family family residential mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market. During the years ended December 31, 2020 2017,2016and 2015,2019, 1 one- to four4-family family residential mortgages sold on the secondary market were $12.4 million, $9.5$13.9 million and $7.9$9.6 million, respectively. Net gains on the sale of residential mortgage loans were $653 thousand in 2020 and $253 thousand in 2019. FNCB retains servicing rights on mortgages sold in the secondary market. 1-4 family residential mortgage loans held for sale were $2.1 million at December 31, 2020and $1.1 million at December 31, 2019.
There were no sales of SBA guaranteed loans during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20202016 and 2015 were $304 thousand, $340 thousand and $292 thousand, respectively. FNCB retains servicing rights on these mortgages. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were $1.1 million and $596 thousand in one- to four-family residential mortgage loans held for sale, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, FNCB sold the guaranteed principal balance of loans that were guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) totaling $900 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively. Net gains realized upon the sales and included in non-interest income totaled $79 thousand in 2017 and $51 thousand in 2016. FNCB retained the servicing rights on these loans. There were no sales of guaranteed loans during the year ended December 31, 2015. . The unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others, including residential mortgages and SBA guaranteedSBA-guaranteed loans were $103.0$96.5million and $103.5$106.0 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
FNCB does not have any lending programs commonly referred to as subprime lending."subprime lending". Subprime lending generally targets borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, and bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios.
FNCB provides for loan losses based on the consistent application of its documented ALLL methodology. Loan losses are charged to the ALLL and recoveries are credited to it. Additions to the ALLL are provided by charges against income based on various factors which, in management’s judgment, deserve current recognition of estimated probable losses. Loan losses are charged-off in the period the loans, or portions thereof, are deemed uncollectible. Generally, FNCB will record a loan charge-off (including a partial charge-off) to reduce a loan to the estimated recoverable amount based on its methodology detailed below. Management regularly reviews the loan portfolio and makes adjustments for loan losses in order to maintain the ALLL in accordance with GAAP. The ALLL consists primarily of the following two components:
(1) | Specific allowances are established for impaired loans, which FNCB defines as all loan relationships with an aggregate outstanding balance greater than $100 thousand rated substandard and on non-accrual, loans rated doubtful or loss, and all TDRs. The amount of impairment provided for as an allowance is represented by the deficiency, if any, between the carrying value of the loan and either (a) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, (b) the loan’s observable market price, or (c) the fair value of the underlying collateral, less estimated costs to sell, for collateral dependent loans. Impaired loans that have no impairment losses are not considered |
(2) | General allowances are established for loan losses on a portfolio basis for loans that do not meet the definition of impaired. FNCB divides its portfolio into loan segments for loans exhibiting similar characteristics. Loans rated special mention or substandard and accruing, which are embedded in these loan segments, are then separated from these loan segments, as these loans are subject to an analysis that emphasizes the credit risk associated with these loans. An estimated loss rate is then applied to each loan segment, which are based on FNCB’s own historical loss experience for each respective loan segment. In addition, management evaluates and applies to each loan segment certain qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with FNCB’s existing portfolio to differ from historical experience, which are discussed below. For loans that have an internal credit rating of special mention or substandard, the qualitative and environmental factors are further adjusted for the increased risk. |
In addition to the specific and general components, management may establish an unallocated allowance that is used to cover any inherent losses that exist as of the evaluation date, but which may have not been identified under the methodology.
As part of its evaluation, management considers qualitative and environmental factors, including, but not limited to:
● |
|
|
● | changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; |
● |
|
|
● | changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff; |
● | changes in the quality of the loan review system and the degree of oversight by the Board of Directors; |
● | changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past due and classified loans, including trends in the |
● | the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations; |
● | the effect of external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the current loan portfolio; and |
● | analysis of customers’ credit quality, including knowledge of their operating environment and financial condition. |
Management evaluates the credit quality of the loan portfolio on an ongoing basis and performs a formal review of the adequacy of the ALLL on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate market conditions. ActualHowever, actual loan losses may be significantly more than the established ALLL, that is established, which could have a material negative effect on FNCB’s operating results or financial condition. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluations, future adjustments to the ALLL may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the information used in making the evaluations. Banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination of FNCB, also review the ALLL, and may require, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, that certain loan balances be charged off or require that adjustments be made to the ALLL.
The following tables present, by loan category, the activity in the ALLL and the allocation of the ALLL and related loan balance disaggregated based on impairment methodology at December 31, 2020 2017,2016and 2015.2019.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses by Loan Category | Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses by Loan Category | Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses by Loan Category | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Residential Real Estate | Commercial Real Estate |
Construction, Land Acquisition and Development | Commercial and Industrial | Consumer | State and Political Subdivisions | Unallocated | Total | Residential Real Estate | Commercial Real Estate | Construction, Land Acquisition and Development | Commercial and Industrial | Consumer | State and Political Subdivisions | Unallocated | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, January 1, 2017 | $ | 1,171 | $ | 3,297 | $ | 268 | $ | 1,736 | $ | 1,457 | $ | 490 | $ | - | $ | 8,419 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, January 1, 2020 | $ | 1,147 | $ | 3,198 | $ | 271 | $ | 1,997 | $ | 1,658 | $ | 253 | $ | 426 | $ | 8,950 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs | (192 | ) | (159 | ) | - | (495 | ) | (603 | ) | - | - | (1,449 | ) | 0 | (336 | ) | 0 | (254 | ) | (975 | ) | 0 | 0 | (1,565 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries | 29 | 45 | 480 | 360 | 381 | - | - | 1,295 | 43 | 846 | 0 | 1,220 | 515 | 0 | 0 | 2,624 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provisions (credits) | 228 | 316 | (539 | ) | 739 | 160 | (135 | ) | - | 769 | 525 | 560 | 267 | (344 | ) | 121 | 152 | 660 | 1,941 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2017 | $ | 1,236 | $ | 3,499 | $ | 209 | $ | 2,340 | $ | 1,395 | $ | 355 | $ | - | $ | 9,034 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,715 | $ | 4,268 | $ | 538 | $ | 2,619 | $ | 1,319 | $ | 405 | $ | 1,086 | $ | 11,950 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2017: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specific reserve | $ | 33 | $ | 138 | $ | - | $ | 600 | $ | 2 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 773 | $ | 13 | $ | 46 | $ | 0 | $ | 357 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 416 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2017: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General reserve | $ | 1,203 | $ | 3,361 | $ | 209 | $ | 1,740 | $ | 1,393 | $ | 355 | $ | - | $ | 8,261 | $ | 1,702 | $ | 4,222 | $ | 538 | $ | 2,262 | $ | 1,319 | $ | 405 | $ | 1,086 | $ | 11,534 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2017 | $ | 158,020 | $ | 261,783 | $ | 20,981 | $ | 150,103 | $ | 134,653 | $ | 42,529 | $ | - | $ | 768,069 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2017: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 1,902 | $ | 8,164 | $ | 85 | $ | 795 | $ | 395 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 11,341 | $ | 2,321 | $ | 8,448 | $ | 69 | $ | 897 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 11,735 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2017: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment | $ | 156,118 | $ | 253,619 | $ | 20,896 | $ | 149,308 | $ | 134,258 | $ | 42,529 | $ | - | $ | 756,728 | 194,007 | 265,455 | 59,716 | 237,538 | 85,881 | 49,009 | 0 | 891,606 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans, gross at December 31, 2020 | $ | 196,328 | $ | 273,903 | $ | 59,785 | $ | 238,435 | $ | 85,881 | $ | 49,009 | $ | 0 | $ | 903,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses by Loan Category | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Residential Real Estate | Commercial Real Estate | Construction, Land Acquisition and Development | Commercial and Industrial | Consumer | State and Political Subdivisions | Unallocated | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, January 1, 2019 | $ | 1,175 | $ | 3,107 | $ | 188 | $ | 2,552 | $ | 2,051 | $ | 417 | $ | 29 | $ | 9,519 | ||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs | (27 | ) | 0 | (18 | ) | (1,258 | ) | (1,311 | ) | 0 | 0 | (2,614 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries | 9 | 32 | 82 | 364 | 761 | 0 | 0 | 1,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provisions (credits) | (10 | ) | 59 | 19 | 339 | 157 | (164 | ) | 397 | 797 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2019 | $ | 1,147 | $ | 3,198 | $ | 271 | $ | 1,997 | $ | 1,658 | $ | 253 | $ | 426 | $ | 8,950 | ||||||||||||||||
Specific reserve | $ | 10 | $ | 221 | $ | 0 | $ | 242 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 473 | ||||||||||||||||
General reserve | $ | 1,137 | $ | 2,977 | $ | 271 | $ | 1,755 | $ | 1,658 | $ | 253 | $ | 426 | $ | 8,477 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 2,906 | $ | 11,640 | $ | 76 | $ | 1,164 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 15,786 | ||||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment | 184,957 | 266,739 | 47,408 | 146,459 | 121,099 | 43,908 | 0 | 810,570 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans, gross at December 31, 2019 | $ | 187,863 | $ | 278,379 | $ | 47,484 | $ | 147,623 | $ | 121,099 | $ | 43,908 | $ | 0 | $ | 826,356 | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses by Loan Category | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Residential Real Estate | Commercial Real Estate | Construction, Land Acquisition and Development | Commercial and Industrial | Consumer | State and Political Subdivisions | Unallocated | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, January 1, 2015 | $ | 1,772 | $ | 4,663 | $ | 665 | $ | 2,104 | $ | 1,673 | $ | 598 | $ | 45 | $ | 11,520 | ||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs | (139 | ) | (912 | ) | (688 | ) | (180 | ) | (716 | ) | - | - | (2,635 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries | 58 | 307 | - | 400 | 485 | - | - | 1,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provisions (credits) | (358 | ) | (712 | ) | 876 | (1,119 | ) | 52 | (113 | ) | 29 | (1,345 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 1,333 | $ | 3,346 | $ | 853 | $ | 1,205 | $ | 1,494 | $ | 485 | $ | 74 | $ | 8,790 | ||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specific reserve | $ | 92 | $ | 287 | $ | 1 | $ | - | $ | 1 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 381 | ||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General reserve | $ | 1,241 | $ | 3,059 | $ | 852 | $ | 1,205 | $ | 1,493 | $ | 485 | $ | 74 | $ | 8,409 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 130,696 | $ | 245,198 | $ | 30,843 | $ | 146,826 | $ | 128,533 | $ | 46,056 | $ | - | $ | 728,152 | ||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 2,930 | $ | 3,831 | $ | 646 | $ | 203 | $ | 351 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 7,961 | ||||||||||||||||
Ending balance, December 31, 2015: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment | $ | 127,766 | $ | 241,367 | $ | 30,197 | $ | 146,623 | $ | 128,182 | $ | 46,056 | $ | - | $ | 720,191 | ||||||||||||||||
Credit Quality Indicators – Commercial Loans
Management continuously monitors and evaluates the credit quality of FNCB’s commercial loans by regularly reviewing certain credit quality indicators. Management utilizes credit risk ratings as the key credit quality indicator for evaluating the credit quality of FNCB’s loan receivables.
FNCB’s commercial loan classification and credit grading processes are part of the lending, underwriting, and credit administration functions to ensure an ongoing assessment of credit quality. FNCB maintains a formal, written loan classification and credit grading system that includes a discussion of the factors used to assign appropriate classifications of credit grades to loans. The risk grade groupings provide a mechanism to identify risk within the loan portfolio and provide management and the Boardboard of directors with periodic reports by risk category. The process also identifies groups of loans that warrant the special attention of management. Accurate and timely loan classification and credit grading is a critical component of loan portfolio management. Loan officers are required to review their loan portfolio risk ratings regularly for accuracy. In addition, the credit risk ratings play an important role in the loan review function, as well as the establishment and evaluation of the provision for loan and lease losses and the ALLL.
The loan review function uses the same risk rating system in the loan review process. Quarterly, FNCB engages an independent third party to assess the quality of the loan portfolio and evaluate the accuracy of ratings with the loan officer’s and management’s assessment.
FNCB’s loan rating system assigns a degree of risk to commercial loans based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends, among other factors. Management analyzes these non-homogeneous loans individually by grading the loans as to credit risk and probability of collection for each type of loan. Commercial and industrial loans include commercial indirect auto loans which are not individually risk rated, and construction, land acquisition and development loans include residential construction loans which are also not individually risk rated. These loans are monitored on a pool basis due to their homogeneous nature as described in “Credit Quality Indicators – Other Loans” below. FNCB risk rates certain residential real estate loans and consumer loans that are part of a larger commercial relationship using a credit grading system as described in “Credit Quality Indicators – Commercial Loans.” The grading system contains the following basic risk categories:
1. Minimal Risk
2. Above Average Credit Quality
3. Average Risk
4. Acceptable Risk
5. Pass - Watch
6. Special Mention
7. Substandard - Accruing
8. Substandard - Non-Accrual
9. Doubtful
10. Loss
This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis using the following definitions for risk ratings:
Pass – Assets rated 1 through 5 are considered pass ratings. These assets show no current or potential problems and are considered fully collectible. All such loans are evaluated collectively for ALLL calculation purposes. However, accruing loans restructured under a troubled debt restructuring (“TDRs”)TDR that have been performing for an extended period, do not represent a higher risk of loss, and have been upgraded to a pass rating are evaluated individually for impairment.
Special Mention – Assets classified as special mention do not currently expose FNCB to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant an adverse classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving close attention. Special mention assets have a potential weakness or pose an unwarranted financial risk which, if not corrected, could weaken the asset and increase risk in the future.
Substandard – Assets classified as substandard have well defined weaknesses based on objective evidence and are characterized by the distinct possibility that FNCB will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful – Assets classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard with the added characteristic that such weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable based on current circumstances.
Loss – Assets classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted.
Credit Quality Indicators – Other Loans
Certain residential real estate loans, consumer loans, and commercial indirect auto loans are monitored on a pool basis due to their homogeneous nature. Loans that are delinquent 90 days or more are placed on non-accrual status unless collection of the loan is in process and reasonably assured. FNCB utilizes accruing versus non-accrual status as the credit quality indicator for these loan pools.
The following tables present the recorded investment in loans receivable by loan category and credit quality indicator at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
| Credit Quality Indicators | Credit Quality Indicators | Credit Quality Indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Loans | Other Loans | Commercial Loans | Other Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special | Subtotal | Accruing | Non-accrual | Subtotal | Total | Special | Subtotal | Accruing | Non-accrual | Subtotal | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass | Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Commercial | Loans | Loans | Other | Loans | Pass | Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Commercial | Loans | Loans | Other | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 27,186 | $ | 421 | $ | 62 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 27,669 | $ | 129,887 | $ | 464 | $ | 130,351 | $ | 158,020 | $ | 35,839 | $ | 494 | $ | 209 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 36,542 | $ | 158,896 | $ | 890 | $ | 159,786 | $ | 196,328 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 245,779 | 2,461 | 13,543 | - | - | 261,783 | - | - | - | 261,783 | 256,390 | 4,349 | 13,164 | 0 | 0 | 273,903 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 273,903 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 18,280 | 330 | 6 | - | - | 18,616 | 2,365 | - | 2,365 | 20,981 | 55,697 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55,697 | 4,088 | 0 | 4,088 | 59,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 142,019 | 479 | 1,597 | - | - | 144,095 | 6,008 | - | 6,008 | 150,103 | 233,370 | 961 | 1,104 | 0 | 0 | 235,435 | 3,000 | 0 | 3,000 | 238,435 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 1,731 | - | 34 | - | - | 1,765 | 132,584 | 304 | 132,888 | 134,653 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85,374 | 507 | 85,881 | 85,881 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 42,040 | - | 396 | - | - | 42,436 | 93 | - | 93 | 42,529 | 48,998 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48,998 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 49,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 477,035 | $ | 3,691 | $ | 15,638 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 496,364 | $ | 270,937 | $ | 768 | $ | 271,705 | $ | 768,069 | $ | 630,294 | $ | 5,804 | $ | 14,477 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 650,575 | $ | 251,369 | $ | 1,397 | $ | 252,766 | $ | 903,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Quality Indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Loans |
Other Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special | Subtotal | Accruing | Non-accrual | Subtotal | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass | Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Commercial | Loans | Loans | Other | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 25,506 | $ | 394 | $ | 466 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 26,366 | $ | 117,286 | $ | 608 | $ | 117,894 | $ | 144,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 233,523 | 4,911 | 5,396 | - | - | 243,830 | - | - | - | 243,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 14,101 | 346 | 448 | - | - | 14,895 | 3,462 | - | 3,462 | 18,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 142,794 | 2,794 | 1,128 | - | - | 146,716 | 4,042 | - | 4,042 | 150,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 2,699 | - | 37 | - | - | 2,736 | 124,935 | 173 | 125,108 | 127,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 40,424 | 2,964 | 321 | - | - | 43,709 | - | - | - | 43,709 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 459,047 | $ | 11,409 | $ | 7,796 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 478,252 | $ | 249,725 | $ | 781 | $ | 250,506 | $ | 728,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Quality Indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Loans | Other Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special | Subtotal | Accruing | Non-accrual | Subtotal | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass | Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Commercial | Loans | Loans | Other | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 35,330 | $ | 177 | $ | 307 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 35,814 | $ | 150,715 | $ | 1,334 | $ | 152,049 | $ | 187,863 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 266,112 | 1,668 | 10,599 | 0 | 0 | 278,379 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 278,379 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 46,361 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46,361 | 1,123 | 0 | 1,123 | 47,484 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 140,589 | 426 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 142,499 | 5,124 | 0 | 5,124 | 147,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 120,451 | 648 | 121,099 | 121,099 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 43,908 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43,908 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43,908 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 532,300 | $ | 2,271 | $ | 12,390 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 546,960 | $ | 277,413 | $ | 1,982 | $ | 279,395 | $ | 826,356 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Included in loans receivable are loans for which the accrual of interest income has been discontinued due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrowers. The recorded investment in these non-accrual loans was$2.65.6 million and $2.2 million at December 31, 2017 2020and $9.1 million at 2016, respectively. December 31, 2019. Generally, loans are placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days or more delinquent, and remaindelinquent. Once a loan is placed on non-accrual status it remains on non-accrual status until they areit has been brought current, havehas six months of performance under the loan terms, and factors indicating reasonable doubt about the timely collection of payments no longer exists. Therefore, loans may be current in accordance with their loan terms, or may be less than 90 days delinquent, and still be on a non-accrual status. At December 31,2020, there was one commercial and industrial loan that was past due 90 days or more and still accruing, which has subsequently been brought current. There were noloans past due 90 days or more and still accruing at December 31, 2017 and 2016.2019.
The following tables present the delinquency status of past due and non-accrual loans at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delinquency Status | Delinquency Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0-29 Days | 30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | >/= 90 Days | 0-29 Days | 30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | >/= 90 Days | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Total | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performing (accruing) loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 156,701 | $ | 793 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 157,494 | $ | 194,820 | $ | 251 | $ | 159 | $ | 0 | $ | 195,230 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 260,276 | 70 | 473 | - | 260,819 | 270,059 | 606 | 0 | 0 | 270,665 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 20,954 | 27 | - | - | 20,981 | 59,785 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate | 437,931 | 890 | 473 | - | 439,294 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 149,046 | 185 | 88 | - | 149,319 | 237,262 | 419 | 16 | 0 | 237,697 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 133,034 | 1,028 | 287 | - | 134,349 | 83,486 | 1,485 | 403 | 0 | 85,374 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 42,529 | - | - | - | 42,529 | 49,009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total performing (accruing) loans | 762,540 | 2,103 | 848 | - | 765,491 | 894,421 | 2,761 | 578 | 0 | 897,760 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 342 | 63 | - | 120 | 525 | 642 | 39 | 0 | 417 | 1,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | - | - | - | 964 | 964 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1,754 | 3,238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate | 342 | 63 | - | 1,084 | 1,489 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 750 | - | - | 35 | 785 | 614 | 0 | 124 | 0 | 738 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 25 | 92 | 53 | 134 | 304 | 114 | 132 | 96 | 165 | 507 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-accrual loans | 1,117 | 155 | 53 | 1,253 | 2,578 | 2,854 | 171 | 220 | 2,336 | 5,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans receivable | $ | 763,657 | $ | 2,258 | $ | 901 | $ | 1,253 | $ | 768,069 | $ | 897,275 | $ | 2,932 | $ | 798 | $ | 2,336 | $ | 903,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Delinquency Status | ||||||||||||||||||||
0-29 Days | 30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | >/= 90 Days | |||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Total | |||||||||||||||
Performing (accruing) loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 185,871 | $ | 134 | $ | 261 | $ | 0 | $ | 186,266 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 272,561 | 75 | 106 | 0 | 272,742 | |||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 47,484 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47,484 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 146,221 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 146,421 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | 118,267 | 1,695 | 489 | 0 | 120,451 | |||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 43,908 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43,908 | |||||||||||||||
Total performing (accruing) loans | 814,312 | 2,104 | 856 | 0 | 817,272 | |||||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 873 | 17 | 228 | 479 | 1,597 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 2,520 | 893 | 434 | 1,790 | 5,637 | |||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 943 | 0 | 114 | 145 | 1,202 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | 193 | 93 | 38 | 324 | 648 | |||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Total non-accrual loans | 4,529 | 1,003 | 814 | 2,738 | 9,084 | |||||||||||||||
Total loans receivable | $ | 818,841 | $ | 3,107 | $ | 1,670 | $ | 2,738 | $ | 826,356 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Delinquency Status | ||||||||||||||||||||
0-29 Days | 30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | >/= 90 Days | |||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Total | |||||||||||||||
Performing (accruing) loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 143,142 | $ | 229 | $ | 107 | $ | - | $ | 143,478 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 241,477 | 830 | 553 | - | 242,860 | |||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 17,766 | 346 | - | - | 18,112 | |||||||||||||||
Total real estate | 402,385 | 1,405 | 660 | - | 404,450 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 150,378 | 307 | 9 | - | 150,694 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | 126,341 | 1,030 | 300 | - | 127,671 | |||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 43,709 | - | - | - | 43,709 | |||||||||||||||
Total peforming (accruing) loans | 722,813 | 2,742 | 969 | - | 726,524 | |||||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 176 | 202 | 17 | 387 | 782 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 201 | 23 | - | 746 | 970 | |||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | - | 245 | - | - | 245 | |||||||||||||||
Total real estate | 377 | 470 | 17 | 1,133 | 1,997 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | - | - | - | 64 | 64 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | 56 | 25 | 2 | 90 | 173 | |||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total non-accrual loans | 433 | 495 | 19 | 1,287 | 2,234 | |||||||||||||||
Total loans receivable | $ | 723,246 | $ | 3,237 | $ | 988 | $ | 1,287 | $ | 728,758 | ||||||||||
The aggregate recorded investment in impaired loans was $11.3 million at December 31, 2017 and $5.6 million at December 31, 2016, an increase of $5.7 million. The increase in impaired loans was primarily due to nine loan relationships that were modified as TDRs during the year ended December 31, 2017. The following tables present a distribution of the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance and the related allowance for FNCB’s impaired loans, which have been analyzed for impairment under ASC 310, at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. Non-accrual loans, other than TDRs, with balances less than the $100 thousand loan relationship threshold are not evaluated individually for impairment and accordingly, are not included in the following tables. However, these loans are evaluated collectively for impairment as homogenoushomogeneous pools in the general allowance under ASC Topic 450. Total non-accrual loans, other than TDRs, with balances less than the $100 thousand loan relationship threshold that were evaluated under ASC Topic 450 amounted to $0.5$1.4 million and $1.0 million atDecember 31, 20172020 and $0.82019 million at December 31, 2016., respectively.
December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | Recorded | Unpaid Principal | Related | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Recorded Investment |
Unpaid Principal Balance | Related Allowance | Investment | Balance | Allowance | ||||||||||||||||||
With no allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 190 | $ | 216 | $ | - | $ | 859 | $ | 957 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 5,174 | 5,295 | - | 2,729 | 5,311 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 85 | 85 | - | 69 | 69 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate | 5,449 | 5,596 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 21 | 53 | - | 5 | 5 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 30 | 30 | - | 0 | 0 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans with no related allowance recorded | 5,500 | 5,679 | - | 3,662 | 6,342 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
With a related allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 1,712 | 1,751 | 33 | 1,462 | 1,462 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 2,990 | 2,990 | 138 | 5,719 | 5,719 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate | 4,702 | 4,741 | 171 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 774 | 774 | 600 | 892 | 1,130 | 357 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 365 | 365 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans with a related allowance recorded | 5,841 | 5,880 | 773 | 8,073 | 8,311 | 416 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total of impaired loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of impaired loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 1,902 | 1,967 | 33 | 2,321 | 2,419 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 8,164 | 8,285 | 138 | 8,448 | 11,030 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 85 | 85 | - | 69 | 69 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate | 10,151 | 10,337 | 171 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 795 | 827 | 600 | 897 | 1,135 | 357 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 395 | 395 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans | $ | 11,341 | $ | 11,559 | $ | 773 | $ | 11,735 | $ | 14,653 | $ | 416 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Recorded Investment |
Unpaid Principal Balance | Related Allowance | |||||||||
With no allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 386 | $ | 477 | $ | - | ||||||
Commercial real estate | 1,066 | 1,143 | - | |||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 350 | 766 | - | |||||||||
Total real estate | 1,802 | 2,386 | - | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 73 | 105 | - | |||||||||
Consumer | - | - | - | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total impaired loans with no related allowance recorded | 1,875 | 2,491 | - | |||||||||
With a related allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 1,543 | 1,543 | 29 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate | 1,871 | 1,871 | 254 | |||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total real estate | 3,414 | 3,414 | 283 | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 18 | 18 | 18 | |||||||||
Consumer | 297 | 297 | 1 | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total impaired loans with a related allowance recorded | 3,729 | 3,729 | 302 | |||||||||
Total of impaired loans | ||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 1,929 | 2,020 | 29 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate | 2,937 | 3,014 | 254 | |||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 350 | 766 | - | |||||||||
Total real estate | 5,216 | 5,800 | 283 | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 91 | 123 | 18 | |||||||||
Consumer | 297 | 297 | 1 | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | |||||||||
Total impaired loans | $ | 5,604 | $ | 6,220 | $ | 302 | ||||||
December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||
Recorded | Unpaid Principal | Related | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | Investment | Balance | Allowance | |||||||||
With no allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 1,240 | $ | 1,329 | $ | - | ||||||
Commercial real estate | 4,548 | 6,007 | - | |||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 76 | 76 | - | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 593 | 850 | - | |||||||||
Consumer | 0 | 0 | - | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 0 | 0 | - | |||||||||
Total impaired loans with no related allowance recorded | 6,457 | 8,262 | - | |||||||||
With a related allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 1,666 | 1,666 | 10 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate | 7,092 | 7,811 | 221 | |||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 571 | 573 | 242 | |||||||||
Consumer | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Total impaired loans with a related allowance recorded | 9,329 | 10,050 | 473 | |||||||||
Total of impaired loans: | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 2,906 | 2,995 | 10 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate | 11,640 | 13,818 | 221 | |||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 76 | 76 | 0 | |||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 1,164 | 1,423 | 242 | |||||||||
Consumer | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Total impaired loans | $ | 15,786 | $ | 18,312 | $ | 473 | ||||||
The following table presents the average balance of, and the interest income recognized on, impaired loans summarized by loan category for the years ended December 31, 2020 2017,2016and 2015:2019:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | Average | Interest | Average | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Average Balance | Interest Income (1) | Average Balance | Interest Income (1) | Average Balance | Interest Income (1) | Balance | Income (1) | Balance | Income (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 2,017 | $ | 84 | $ | 2,428 | $ | 91 | $ | 3,157 | $ | 121 | $ | 2,542 | $ | 78 | $ | 2,400 | $ | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 7,391 | 276 | 3,489 | 92 | 6,830 | 106 | 10,111 | 254 | 10,092 | 297 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 104 | 4 | 428 | 7 | 570 | 18 | 72 | 5 | 79 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate | 9,512 | 364 | 6,345 | 190 | 10,557 | 245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 1,028 | 15 | 283 | 2 | 174 | 2 | 1,041 | 14 | 1,207 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 363 | 13 | 300 | 10 | 356 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| �� | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans | $ | 10,903 | $ | 392 | $ | 6,928 | $ | 202 | $ | 11,087 | $ | 258 | $ | 13,766 | $ | 351 | $ | 13,778 | $ | 398 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Interest income represents income recognized on performing TDRs. |
The additional interest income that would have been earned on non-accrual and restructured loans had these loans performed in accordance with their original terms approximated $0.20.4 million for the yearboth years ended December 31, 2017, $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2020 and $0.42019 million for the year ended December 31, 2015..
Troubled Debt Restructured Loans
TDRs at December 31, 2020 2017and 20162019 were $10.2$7.7 millionand $4.3$9.1 million, respectively. Accruing and non-accruing TDRs were $9.3$7.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively at $0.9 December 31, 2020and $7.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively at December 31, 2017 2019and $4.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively at December 31, 2016.. Approximately $750$197 thousand and $261$97 thousand in specific reserves have been established for TDRs as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. FNCB was not committed to lend additional funds to any loan classified as a TDR at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
The modification of the terms of such loans classified as TDRs may include one or a combination of the following, among others: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an extension of the maturity date, capitalization of real estate taxes, a payment modification under a forbearance agreement, or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment in the loan.
The following table presentstables present the pre- and post-modification recorded investment in loans modified as TDRs and type of modifications made during the years ended December 31, 2017,2020 2016and 20152019::
Year Ended December 31, 2017 | Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment by Type of Modification | Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment by | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Number of Contracts | Extension of Term | Extension of Term and Capitalization of Taxes | Extension of Term and Forbearance | Forbearance | Total | Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan category: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 2 | $ | 190 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 190 | $ | 190 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 8 | - | - | - | 5,250 | 5,250 | 5,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 4 | - | - | 25 | 1,820 | 1,845 | 1,575 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 2 | - | 85 | - | - | 85 | 104 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total modifications | 16 | $ | 190 | $ | 85 | $ | 25 | $ | 7,070 | $ | 7,370 | $ | 7,119 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type of Modification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Number of Contracts | Extension of Term | Extension of Term and Capitalization of Taxes | Capitalization of Taxes | Principal Forbearance | Total | Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan category: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 1 | $ | 93 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 93 | $ | 93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 196 | 196 | 196 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total modifications | 4 | $ | 93 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 196 | $ | 289 | $ | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment by Type of Modification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Number of Contracts | Extension of Term | Extension of Term and Capitalization of Taxes | Extension of Term and Forbearance | Forbearance | Total | Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loan category: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 2 | $ | 159 | $ | 95 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 254 | $ | 258 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 2 | 52 | - | - | - | 52 | 52 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total modifications | 4 | $ | 211 | $ | 95 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 306 | $ | 310 | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2015 | Year Ended December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment by Type of Modification | Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment by | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Number of Contracts | Extension of Term | Extension of Term and Capitalization of Taxes | Extension of Term and Forbearance | Forbearance | Total | Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan category: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 5 | $ | 710 | $ | 100 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 810 | $ | 827 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 1 | - | - | - | 1,654 | 1,654 | 742 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 1 | 96 | - | - | - | 96 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 1 | - | - | - | 79 | 79 | 79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total modifications | 8 | $ | 806 | $ | 100 | $ | - | $ | 1,733 | $ | 2,639 | $ | 1,744 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type of Modification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Number of Contracts | Extension of Term | Extension of Term and Capitalization of Taxes | Extension of Term and Forbearance | Forbearance | Total | Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan category: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 4 | $ | 24 | $ | 0 | $ | 42 | $ | 208 | $ | 274 | $ | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 2 | 432 | 178 | 0 | 0 | 610 | 644 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 4 | 933 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 933 | 932 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total modifications | 10 | $ | 1,389 | $ | 178 | $ | 42 | $ | 208 | $ | 1,817 | $ | 1,865 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There were nine loan relationships modified as TDRs during the year ended December 31, 2017, which incorporated a total of sixteen individual loans. There were three loan relationships, comprised of eight commercial real estate loans totaling $5.3 million, and two loan relationships, comprised of four commercial and industrial loans totaling $1.8 million, that were modified under varying forms of forbearance agreements during the year ended December 31, 2017. Additional TDRs included two consumer loans totaling $85 thousand that had their terms extended and delinquent taxes capitalized, as well as two residential real estate loans totaling of $190 thousand that had their terms extended. The commercial real estate modifications included a principal forbearance agreement for one loan in the amount of $4.0 million and reductions in required monthly principal payments resulting in balloon payments due at maturity for seven loans to two borrowers aggregating $1.2 million. The four commercial and industrial loan modifications involved the delay of required principal and interest payments for predefined time periods. In addition, a charge-off in the amount of $0.3 million was recorded as part of the modification of three commercial and industrial loans aggregating $1.8 million to one borrower. During the third quarter of 2017,two of the four commercial and industrial loans totaling $0.8 million were paid off. All remaining loans modified during the year ended December 31, 2017 are performing in accordance with their respective modified terms.
The following table presents the number and recorded investment of TDRs that were modified within the previous 12 months which have defaulted (defined as past due 90 days or more) during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. There were no TDRs modified within the previous 12 months that defaulted during the yearyears ended December 31, 2015.2020 and 2019.
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Number of Contracts | Recorded Investment | Number of Contracts | Recorded Investment | ||||||||||||
Type of modification: | ||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | - | $ | - | 3 | $ | 107 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate | - | - | 1 | 680 | ||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 1 | 10 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Consumer | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total modifications | 1 | $ | 10 | 4 | $ | 787 | ||||||||||
Modifications Related to COVID-19
For impairment determination purposes, In late March 2020, the federal banking regulators issued guidance and are encouraging banks to work prudently with, and provide short-term payment accommodations to borrowers affected by COVID-three19. residential real estate TDRsAdditionally, Section 4013 of the CARES Act addressed COVID-19 related modifications and specified that defaulted during the year endedsuch modifications made on loans were current as of December 31, 20162019 were considered collateral-dependent loans. One of thedo threenot TDRs suffered a decline in collateral value, which resulted in a charge against the ALLL of $37 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2016. The one commercial real estate loanneed to be classified as TDRs. FNCB has applied this guidance and made 922 such modifications, with a843 loans having an aggregate recorded investment of $680 thousand that defaulted during the year ended$151.4 million outstanding as of December 31, 2016,2020. was foreclosed uponThese initial modifications provided borrowers with a short-term, typically three-month, interest-only period or full payment deferral. FNCB extended a second payment deferral modification for 79 loans with an aggregate recorded investment of $22.0 million. Management is closely monitoring all loans for which a payment deferral has been granted and transferredwill continue to OREO duringfollow regulatory guidance when working with the borrowers which have been impacted by COVID-third19 quarterand apply the provisions of the CARES Act in making any TDR determinations. As of 2016.December 31, 2020, there were 45 loans with an aggregate recorded investment of $9.5 million, or 1.06% of total loans, that were still under deferral.
The following table presents information on COVID-19 related loan modifications by major loan category as of December 31, 2020.
As of December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Loans Modified | Total Number of Loans Still Under Deferral | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Number of Loans | Recorded Investment | % of Loan Category | Number of Loans | Recorded Investment | % of Loan Category | ||||||||||||||||||
COVID-19 related loan modifications: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 199 | $ | 17,594 | 8.96 | % | 5 | $ | 196 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 146 | 94,586 | 34.53 | % | 6 | 8,617 | 3.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Construction, land acquisition and development | 11 | 11,019 | 18.43 | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 106 | 21,659 | 9.08 | % | 1 | 42 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 381 | 6,587 | 7.67 | % | 33 | 677 | 0.79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivision | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 843 | $ | 151,445 | 16.76 | % | 45 | 9,532 | 1.06 | % | |||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate Loan Foreclosures
There were three consumer mortgage loans secured bywas one residential real estate properties property with a recorded investment of $153 thousand that was in the process of foreclosure as of December 31, 2020. There were no residential real estate properties in OREO at December 31, 2020.
There was one residential real estate property with an aggregatea recorded investment of $14$154 thousand that was in the process of foreclosure at December 31, 2017.2019. There were two investor-owned residential real estate properties with an aggregate carrying value of $125$256 thousand foreclosed upon during the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. OfOne of thetwo loans foreclosed upon during 2017,one was an investor-owned residential real estate property, which was subsequently sold during the fourth quarter of 2017. There were two residential real estate properties with an aggregatea carrying value of $52 thousand was sold during $922019. The remaining property with a carrying value of $204 thousand was included in OREO at December 31, 2017.2019 and was subsequently sold in 2020.
There were five consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties in the process of foreclosure with an aggregate recorded investment of $92 thousand at December 31, 2016. There was one residential real estate property with a carrying value of $237 thousand that was foreclosed upon during the year ended December 31, 2016. There were two residential real estate properties with an aggregate carrying value of $41 thousand included in OREO at December 31, 2016.
Note 6. BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT/SUBSEQUENT EVENT
The following table summarizes bank premises and equipment at December 31, 2020 2017and 2016:2019:
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||
Land | $ | 2,757 | $ | 2,757 | $ | 3,537 | $ | 3,537 | ||||||||
Buildings and improvements | 7,968 | 7,676 | 13,708 | 12,798 | ||||||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 10,231 | 12,299 | 12,114 | 11,551 | ||||||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 5,225 | 5,184 | 3,654 | 3,578 | ||||||||||||
Total | 26,181 | 27,916 | 33,013 | 31,464 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (15,793 | ) | (17,132 | ) | (15,434 | ) | (13,946 | ) | ||||||||
Net | $ | 10,388 | $ | 10,784 | $ | 17,579 | $ | 17,518 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense of premises and equipment amounted to $1.4 million, $1.31.6 million and $1.2$1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017,2020 2016and 2015,2019, respectively.
On May 1, 2017, FNCB announced that the Bank will implement a comprehensive branch network improvement program that will focus on strengthening, better positioning and expanding its market coverage by developing new state-of-the-art customer facilities, as well as relocating and consolidating select locations. In accordance with the branch network improvement program, on June 30, 2017, FNCB consolidated its branch office located at 1127 Texas Palmyra Highway, Honesdale, Wayne County, Pennsylvania with its branch located at 1001 Main Street, Honesdale, Pennsylvania. FNCB did not incur any significant disposal costs on the Wayne County consolidation.
As part of this network improvement program, FNCB also announced on May 1, 2017, its intention to relocate three branches located in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania to a new location. The three branches that will be relocated are: 1) a branch located at 734 San Souci Parkway, Hanover Township, Pennsylvania; 2) a branch located at 27 North River Street, Plains, Pennsylvania; and 3) a branch located at 3 Old Boston Road, Pittston, Pennsylvania. These three branches will be relocated into a brand-new facility to be built in the Richland 315 development located at 1150 Route 315, Wilkes-Barre (Plains Township), Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. FNCB currently leases the three branches, as well as the aforementioned Honesdale branch, that was consolidated, and will lease the future Luzerne County facility. FNCB does not expect to incur any significant disposal costs on the Luzerne County branch consolidations. The construction of the Luzerne County facility began in the fourth quarter of 2017 and is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2018, at which time the Luzerne County branch consolidation will occur. The three existing branches will continue to operate as full-service branches until that time.
On October 11, 2017, the Bank signed an agreement to purchase its corporate center located at 200 South Blakely Street, Dunmore, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania for $2.15 million. FNCB had been leasing this property since 1994. The purchase of the corporate center was finalized on January 12, 2018.
Note 7. DEPOSITS
The following table summarizes deposits by major category at December 31, 2020 31,2017and 2016:2019:
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||
Demand (non-interest bearing) | $ | 176,325 | $ | 173,702 | $ | 271,499 | $ | 179,465 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand | 532,351 | 551,114 | 713,398 | 534,677 | ||||||||||||
Savings | 101,433 | 103,241 | 109,664 | 94,530 | ||||||||||||
Time ($250,000 and over) | 43,807 | 35,917 | 36,216 | 48,425 | ||||||||||||
Other time | 148,532 | 151,165 | 156,671 | 144,612 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing | 826,123 | 841,437 | 1,015,949 | 822,244 | ||||||||||||
Total deposits | $ | 1,002,448 | $ | 1,015,139 | $ | 1,287,448 | $ | 1,001,709 | ||||||||
The aggregate amount of deposits reclassified as loans was $$86 thousand at 57 December 31, 2020and $62 thousand at December 31, 2017 2019and $80 thousand at December 31, 2016.. Management evaluates transaction accounts that are overdrawn for collectability as part of its evaluation for credit losses. During 20172020 and 2016,2019, no deposits were received on terms other than those available in the normal course of business.
The following table summarizes scheduled maturities of time deposits, including certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts, at December 31, 20202017::
| $250,000 | Other | $250,000 | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | and Over | Time Deposits | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 33,537 | $ | 110,133 | $ | 143,670 | ||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 8,051 | 19,412 | 27,463 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 1,310 | 8,535 | 9,845 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 400 | 5,877 | 6,277 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 509 | 4,575 | 5,084 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2023 and thereafter | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 43,807 | $ | 148,532 | $ | 192,339 | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | and Over | Time Deposits | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 33,161 | 132,717 | 165,878 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 3,055 | 13,315 | 16,370 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 0 | 3,940 | 3,940 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2024 | 0 | 3,753 | 3,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 0 | 2,946 | 2,946 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2026 and thereafter | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 36,216 | $ | 156,671 | $ | 192,887 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities with a carrying value of $282.3$279.7 million and $271.3$235.0 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, were pledged to collateralize certain municipal deposits. In addition, FNCB had outstanding letters of credit with the FHLB to secure municipal deposits of $5.0$75.0 million and $75.0$60.0 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Note 8. BORROWED FUNDS
Short-term borrowings available to FNCB include overnight FHLBadvances through the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh ("FHLB") advances, federal funds purchasedlines of credit and the Federal Reserve Discount Window, which generally represent overnight or less than 30-day borrowings. FNCB’sFNCB's maximum borrowing capacity under federal funds lines of credit, and the Federal Reserve Discount Window was $20.0 million and $12.5 million, respectively at December 31, 2017. Federal funds lines of creditwhich are unsecured, while any borrowings through the Federal Reserve Discount Window are fully collateralized by certain pledged loans in the amount of $22.6was $40.0 million at December 31, 2017.2020.
FNCB has an agreement with the FHLB of Pittsburgh which allows for borrowings, either overnight or term, up to itsa maximum borrowing capacity which is based on a percentage of qualifying loans pledged under a blanket pledge agreement. Loans of $448.2 million and $427.8 million, at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were pledged to collateralize borrowings under this agreement. FNCB’s maximum borrowing capacity was $314.3 million at December 31, 2017, of which $45.0 million in fixed-rate advances having original maturities between nine months and five years, as well as a $5.0 million letter of credit to secure municipal deposits, were outstanding. In addition to pledging loans, FNCB is required to purchase FHLB of Pittsburgh stock based upon the amount of advances credit extended. Loans that were pledged to collateralize borrowings under this agreement were $500.1 million at December 31, 2020 and $475.3 million at December 31, 2019. FNCB’s maximum borrowing capacity was $352.2 million at December 31, 2020. There was $75.0 million in letters of credit outstanding.to secure municipal deposits outstanding at December 31, 2020 under this agreement. There were no overnight borrowings or term advances through the FHLB outstanding at December 31, 2020.
Advances through the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window generally include short-term advances which are fully collateralized by certain pledged loans in the amount of $31.5 million under the Federal Reserve Bank’s Borrower-in-Custody (“BIC”) program. There were no advances under the BIC program outstanding at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. FNCB had available borrowing capacity of $16.4 million under this program at December 31, 2020.
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||
Maximum | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Ending | Average | Month-End | Rate for | Rate at | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Balance | Balance | the Year | Period End | |||||||||||||||
FHLB of Pittsburgh advances - overnight | $ | - | $ | 3,679 | $ | 22,260 | 1.22 | % | - | |||||||||||
FHLB of Pittsburgh advances - term | 44,968 | 50,477 | 59,805 | 1.10 | % | 1.44 | % | |||||||||||||
Federal funds | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Federal reserve discount window advances | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures | 5,000 | 8,329 | 10,000 | 4.50 | % | 4.50 | % | |||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 2.90 | % | 2.99 | % | |||||||||||||
On April 9, 2020 the Federal Reserve Bank established the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (“PPPLF”) through the Discount Window to provide participating lenders with liquidity to loan money under the PPP. PPPLF advances are collateralized by pools of PPP loans, have an interest rate of 0.35% and a maturity date equal to the term of the pool of PPP loans securing it. Repayment of PPP loans serving as collateral must be passed on to the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window to pay down the corresponding PPPLF advance. At December 31, 2020, there were 0 outstanding advances under the PPPLF and FNCB had $58.3 million in availability through this facility.
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum | Average | Average | Maximum | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending | Average | Month-End | Rate for | Rate at | Ending | Average | Month-End | Rate for | Rate at | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Balance | Balance | the Year | Period End | Balance | Balance | Balance | the Year | Period End | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB of Pittsburgh advances - overnight | $ | - | $ | 21,443 | $ | 74,280 | 0.56 | % | - | $ | 0 | $ | 5,501 | $ | 35,125 | 1.24 | % | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB of Pittsburgh advances - term | 58,537 | 57,824 | 70,994 | 0.74 | % | 0.87 | % | 0 | 26,354 | 52,809 | 1.54 | % | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | 26 | 0 | 0.76 | % | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal reserve discount window advances | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures | 10,000 | 13,661 | 14,000 | 4.50 | % | 4.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal reserve discount window BIC advances | 0 | 437 | 10,000 | 0.25 | % | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal reserve discount window PPPLF advances | 0 | 8,659 | 36,272 | 0.35 | % | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 2.39 | % | 2.52 | % | 10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 2.43 | % | 1.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||
Maximum | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Ending | Average | Month-End | Rate for | Rate at | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Balance | Balance | the Year | Period End | |||||||||||||||
FHLB of Pittsburgh advances - overnight | $ | 14,100 | $ | 14,971 | $ | 59,825 | 2.58 | % | 1.80 | % | ||||||||||
FHLB of Pittsburgh advances - term | 32,809 | 37,831 | 65,171 | 2.26 | % | 1.86 | % | |||||||||||||
Federal funds | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Federal reserve discount window BIC advances | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures | 0 | 520 | 5,000 | 4.50 | % | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 4.17 | % | 3.56 | % | |||||||||||||
On December 14, 2006, the Issuing Trust issued $10.0$10.0 million of trust preferred securities (the “Trust Securities”) at a variable interest rate of 7.02%, with a scheduled maturity of December 15, 2036. FNCB owns 100.0% of the ownership interest in the Issuing Trust. The proceeds from the issue were invested in $10.3$10.3 million, 7.02% Junior Subordinated Debentures (the “Debentures”) issued by FNCB. The interest rate on the Trust Securities and the Debentures resets quarterly at a spread of 1.67% above the current 3-month LIBOR rate. The average interest rate paid on the Debentures was 2.90%2.43% in 2017,2020 2.39%and 4.17% in 2016,2019 and 1.99% in 2015.. The Debentures are unsecured and rank subordinate and junior in right to all indebtedness, liabilities and obligations of FNCB. The Debentures represent the sole assets of the Trust. Interest on the Trust Securities is deferrable until a period of twenty consecutive quarters has elapsed. FNCB hadhas the option to prepay the Trust Securities beginning December 15, 2011. FNCB has, under the terms of the Debentures and the related Indenture, as well as the other operative corporate documents, agreed to irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee the Trust’s obligations under the Debentures. FNCB has reflected this investment on a deconsolidated basis. As a result, the Debentures totaling $10.3$10.3 million, have been reflected in borrowed funds in the consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 under the caption “Junior Subordinated Debentures”. FNCB records interest expense on the Debentures in its consolidated statements of income. FNCB also records its common stock investment issued by First National Community Statutory Trust I in other assets in its consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, accrued and unpaid interest associated with the Debentures amounted to $16$9 thousand and $13$16 thousand, respectively.
On September 1, 2009, FNCB offered only to accredited investors up to $25.0$25.0 million principal amount of unsecured subordinated debentures due September 1, 2019 (the “Notes”). Prior to July 1, 2015, the Notes had a fixed interest rate of 9% per annum. Payments of interest are payable to registered holders of the Notes (the “Noteholders”) quarterly on the first of every third month, subject to the right of FNCB to defer such payment. On June 30, 2015, pursuant to approval from all of the Noteholders and the Reserve Bank, FNCB amended the original terms of the Notes to reduce the interest rate payable from 9.00% to 4.50% effective July 1, 2015 and to accelerate a partial repayment of principal amount under the Notes. Pursuant to the approved amendment, on June 30, 2015, FNCB repaid 44% of the original principal amount, or $11.0 million, of the Notes outstanding to the holders on June 30, 2015, with the remaining $14.02015. At December 31, 2018, there was $5.0 million in principal to be repaid as follows: (a) 16% ofoutstanding on the original principal amount, or Notes.$4.0 O million, payable onn September 1, 2017; (b) 20% of the original principal amounts, or $5.0 million, payable on September 1, 2018; and (c) the final 20% of the original principal amount, or $5.0 million, payable on September 1,January 30, 2019,the maturity date of the Notes. On October 28, 2016, the Board of Directors of FNCB approved the acceleration of a $4.0the final $5.0 million partial repayment of principal on the Notes. The $4.0$5.0 million principal repayment, which was due and payable on September 1, 2017,2019, along with all outstanding accrued interest for the period December 1, 2018 through February 7, 2019, was paid to Noteholders on December 1, 2016. February 8, 2019.On July 27, 2017, the Board of Directors of FNCB approved the acceleration of a $5.0 million partial repayment of principal on the Notes. The $5.0 million principal repayment, which was due and payable on September 1, 2018, was paid to Noteholders on September 1, 2017. The principal balance outstanding for these Notes was $5.0 million at December 31, 2017 and $10.0 million at December 31, 2016. The accrued and unpaid interest associated with the Notes amounted to $19 thousand and $39 thousand at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The following table presents maturities of borrowed funds and the weighted-average rate by contractual maturity date at December 31, 2017:2020:
December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | Average | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Amount | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Amount | Interest Rate | ||||||||||||
2018 | $ | 25,432 | 1.21 | % | ||||||||||||
2019 | 24,536 | 2.30 | % | |||||||||||||
2020 | - | - | ||||||||||||||
2021 | - | - | $ | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
2022 | - | - | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Thereafter | 10,310 | 2.91 | % | |||||||||||||
2023 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
2024 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
2025 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
2026 and thereafter | 10,310 | 1.89 | % | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 60,278 | 1.95 | % | $ | 10,310 | 1.89 | % | ||||||||
Note 9. DERIVATIVE AND HEDGING TRANSACTIONS
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
FNCB is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. It principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. FNCB manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, FNCB enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future unknown and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. Derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of known or expected cash payments primarily related to FNCB's borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
FNCB's objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, FNCB primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for FNCB making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. During 2020, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with forecasted issuances of debt.
For derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on FNCB's variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, it is estimated that an additional $69 thousand will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
Non-designated Hedges
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and result from a service FNCB provides to certain customers. FNCB executes interest rate swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting interest rate swaps that FNCB executes with a third party, such that FNCB minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized directly in earnings.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of FNCB's derivative financial instruments and the classification on the consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
Derivative Assets | Derivative Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2020 | As of December 31, 2019 | As of December 31, 2020 | As of December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Notional Amount | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | Notional Amount | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate products | $ | 0 | Other assets | $ | 0 | Other assets | $ | 0 | $ | 30,000 | Other liabilities | $ | 120 | Other liabilities | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | 0 | 0 | 120 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Rate Products | 2,750 | Other assets | 23 | Other assets | 0 | 2,750 | Other liabilities | 23 | Other liabilities | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and other collateral (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net derivative amounts | $ | 23 | $ | 0 | $ | 143 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Other collateral represents the amount that cannot be used to offset our derivative assets and liabilities from a gross basis to a net basis in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. The other collateral consist of securities and is exchanged under bilateral collateral and master netting agreements that allow us to offset the net derivative position with the related collateral. The application of the other collateral cannot reduce the net derivative position below zero. Therefore, excess other collateral, if any, is not reflected above. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There were no derivative financial instruments outstanding as of December 31, 2019 or during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Effect of Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedge Accounting on Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The table below presents the effect of fair value and cash flow hedge accounting on accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2020. Amounts disclosed are gross and not net of taxes.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI Included Component | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI Excluded Component | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income Included Component | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income Excluded Component | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate products | $ | (102 | ) | $ | (102 | ) | $ | 0 | Interest expense | $ | 11 | $ | 11 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (102 | ) | $ | (102 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 11 | $ | 11 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||
Effect of Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedge Accounting on the Statement of Income
The table below presents the effect of the FNCB's derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31,2020.
Location and Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | ||||
Year Ended | ||||
December 31, 2020 | ||||
(in thousands) | Interest Expense | |||
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the cash flow statement of financial performance in which the effects of fair value or hedges are recorded | $ | 11 | ||
The effects of fair value and cash flow hedging: | ||||
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships in Subtopic 815-20 | ||||
Interest contracts: | ||||
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income | $ | 11 | ||
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income as a result that a forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring | $ | 0 | ||
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income - included component | $ | 11 | ||
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income - excluded component | $ | 0 | ||
Effect of Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments on the Statement of Income
Derivative financial instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments had no effect on the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
FNCB has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if FNCB defaults or is capable of being declared in default on any of its indebtedness, then it could also be declared in its derivative obligations.
FNCB has agreements with certain of its derivatives counterparties that contain a provision where if it fails to maintain its status as a well-capitalized institution, then it could be required to post additional collateral.
As of December 31, 2020, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustments for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $135 thousand. As of December 31, 2020, FNCB has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If FNCB had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2020, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value of $135 thousand.
Note 10. BENEFIT PLANS
The Bank has a defined contribution profit sharing plan (“Profit Sharing Plan”) which includes the provision under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (“401(k)”) and covers all eligible employees. The Bank’sBank’s contribution to the planProfit Sharing Plan is determined at management’s discretion at the end of each year and funded. The 401(k) feature of the planProfit Sharing Plan permits employees to make voluntary salary deferrals, either pre-tax or Roth, up to the dollar limit prescribed by law. FNCB may make discretionary matching contributions equal to a uniform percentage of employee salary deferrals. Discretionary matching contributions are determined each year by management and approved by the Board of Directors. There were no discretionary annual contributions made to the profit sharing planProfit Sharing Plan in 2017,20162020 and 2015.2019. Discretionary matching contributions under the 401(k) feature of the plan totaled $187 thousand, $168 thousand, and $149$332 thousand in 2017,20162020 and $305 thousand in 2015,2019 respectively..
The Bank has an unfunded non-qualified deferred compensation plan covering all eligible Bank officers and directors as defined by the plan. This plan permits eligible participants to elect to defer a portion of their compensation. Elective deferred compensation and accrued earnings, included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition, aggregated $3.12.0 million at both December 31, 20172020 and 2016.December 31, 2019.
On October 1, 2015, theThe Bank executedhas a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for a select group of management or highly compensated employees within the meaning of Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3) and 401(a)(1) of The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The general provisions of the SERP provide for annual year-end contributions, performance contingent contributions and discretionary contributions. The SERP contributions are unfunded for Federal tax purposes and constitute an unsecured promise by the Bank to pay benefits in the future and are included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition. Participants in the SERP shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Bank. SERP contributions totaled$172 thousand, $147 thousand, and $130 $240 thousand in 2017,2016,2020 and $173 thousand in 2015,2019 respectively.. The total liability associated with the SERP was $449$856 thousandat December 31, 20172020 and $277$657 thousand at December 31, 2016.2019.
Note 10.11. INCOME TAXES
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law H.R.1., formally known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” which among other things, reduces the maximum federal corporate income tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% effective January 1, 2018. In accordance with GAAP, the enactment of this new tax legislation required FNCB to revalue its deferred tax assets at the new corporate statutory rate of 21.0% as of December 31, 2017. The revaluation of FNCB’s deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, resulted in a reduction in its net deferred tax assets of $8.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 with a corresponding increase in the income tax expense.
The following table summarizes the current and deferred amounts of the provision for income tax expense (benefit) and the change in valuation allowance for each of the threetwo years ended December 31, 2020 2017,2016and 2015:2019:
For the Year Ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Current | $ | 251 | $ | 134 | $ | (75 | ) | $ | 6 | $ | 0 | |||||||||
Deferred | 3,030 | 1,968 | 2,297 | 3,219 | 2,326 | |||||||||||||||
Revaluation adjustment | 8,007 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance | - | (355 | ) | (29,981 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 11,288 | $ | 1,747 | $ | (27,759 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 3,225 | $ | 2,326 | ||||||||||||||||
The following table presents a reconciliation between the effective income tax expense (benefit) and the income tax expense that would have been provided at FNCB’s historicthe federal statutory tax rate of 34.0%21.0% for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015:December 31, 2019:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Provision at statutory tax rates | $ | 3,888 | $ | 2,739 | $ | 2,748 | ||||||
Add (deduct): | ||||||||||||
Tax effects of non-taxable income | (459 | ) | (481 | ) | (483 | ) | ||||||
Non-deductible interest expense | 10 | 9 | 11 | |||||||||
Bank-owned life insurance | (179 | ) | (187 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||||
Change in valuation allowance | - | (355 | ) | (29,981 | ) | |||||||
Revaluation adjustment | 8,007 | - | - | |||||||||
Other items, net | 21 | 22 | 138 | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 11,288 | $ | 1,747 | $ | (27,759 | ) | |||||
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | % | Amount | % | ||||||||||||
Provision at statutory tax rates | $ | 3,900 | 21.00 | % | $ | 2,814 | 21.00 | % | ||||||||
Add (deduct): | ||||||||||||||||
Tax effects of tax free interest income | (632 | ) | (3.40 | )% | (344 | ) | (2.56 | )% | ||||||||
Non-deductible interest expense | 46 | 0.25 | % | 19 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
Bank-owned life insurance | (101 | ) | (0.55 | )% | (109 | ) | (0.81 | )% | ||||||||
Other items, net | 12 | 0.06 | % | (54 | ) | (0.41 | )% | |||||||||
Income tax provision | $ | 3,225 | 17.36 | % | $ | 2,326 | 17.36 | % | ||||||||
The following table summarizes the components of the net deferred tax asset includedassets at December 31, 2020 and 2019:
December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses | $ | 2,638 | $ | 2,027 | ||||
Deferred compensation | 641 | 592 | ||||||
Lease liability | 752 | 729 | ||||||
Other real estate owned valuation | 23 | 33 | ||||||
Deferred intangible assets | 45 | 166 | ||||||
Employee benefits | 210 | 192 | ||||||
| Accrued interest | 2 | 0 | ||||||
Accrued vacation | 56 | 42 | ||||||
Deferred income | 51 | 0 | ||||||
Depreciation | 13 | 10 | ||||||
| Derivative liabilities | 24 | 0 | ||||||
Net operating loss carryover | 418 | 4,348 | ||||||
Gross deferred tax assets | 4,873 | 8,139 | ||||||
Deferred loan origination costs | (173 | ) | (143 | ) | ||||
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale | (3,715 | ) | (812 | ) | ||||
| Unrealized holding gains on equity securities | (118 | ) | 0 | |||||
Right of use asset | (686 | ) | (660 | ) | ||||
| Deferred income | 0 | (22 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest | 0 | (224 | ) | |||||
Gross deferred tax liabilities | (4,692 | ) | (1,861 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 181 | $ | 6,278 | ||||
At December 31, 2020 FNCB had approximately $2.0 million in other assetsfederal net operating loss ("NOL") carryovers, which expire in 2035 if not used. Deferred taxes associated with these NOL carryovers were $418 thousand at December 31, 20202017 and 2016:
December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses | $ | 1,986 | $ | 2,961 | ||||
Deferred compensation | 761 | 1,242 | ||||||
Unrealized holding losses on securities available-for-sale | 464 | 804 | ||||||
Other real estate owned valuation | 195 | 233 | ||||||
Deferred intangible assets | 457 | 997 | ||||||
Employee benefits | 158 | 272 | ||||||
AMT tax credits | 2,850 | 2,600 | ||||||
Charitable contribution carryover | 74 | 235 | ||||||
Accrued rent expense | 75 | 157 | ||||||
Accrued vacation | 26 | 55 | ||||||
Accrued legal settlement costs | 544 | 941 | ||||||
Deferred income | 35 | 81 | ||||||
Depreciation | 97 | - | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 9 | - | ||||||
Net operating loss carryover | 8,515 | 17,123 | ||||||
Gross deferred tax assets | 16,246 | 27,701 | ||||||
Deferred loan origination costs | (251 | ) | (551 | ) | ||||
Accrued interest | (210 | ) | (193 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses | - | (74 | ) | |||||
Depreciation | - | (8 | ) | |||||
Gross deferred tax liabilities | (461 | ) | (826 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 15,785 | $ | 26,875 | ||||
As of December 31, 2017, FNCB had $40.5 million of net operating loss carryovers resulting in deferred tax assets of $8.5 million. As of December 31, 2017, FNCB also had $353 thousand of charitable contribution carryovers resulting in gross deferred tax assets of $74 thousand. These charitable contribution carryovers will begin to expire after December 31, 2018 if not utilized. In addition, FNCB had alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credit carryovers of $2.9 million as of December 31, 2017 that have an indefinite life..
Management evaluates the carrying amount of its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if necessary, in accordance with guidance set forth in ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” and applies the criteria in the guidance to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized within its life cycle, based on the weight of available evidence. In evaluating available evidence, management considers, among other factors, historical financial performance, expectation of future earnings, the ability to carry back losses to recoup taxes previously paid, length of statutory carry forward periods, experience with operating loss and tax credit carry forwards not expiring unused, tax planning strategies and timing of reversals of temporary differences. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management carefully weighs both positive and negative evidence currently available. The weight given to the potential effect of positive and negative evidence must be commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. If management determines based on available evidence, both positive and negative, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized in future periods, a valuation allowance is calculated and recorded. These determinations are inherently subjective and depend upon management’s estimates and judgments used in their evaluation of both positive and negative evidence.
Prior to Based on the most recent evaluation at December 31, 2015, 2020FNCB had established a full valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets. At December 31, 2015, ,management performed an evaluation of FNCB’s deferred tax assets and determined that based on its consistent methodology the negative evidence that was previously present to support the full valuation allowance no longer existed. FNCB’s core earnings had normalized and it was now in a cumulative three-year income position, which management deemed to be positive evidence. In addition, management believed that FNCB’s projected future earnings were sufficient to be able to utilize its available NOL carryforwards prior to their expiration.
This analysis supported the reversal of the valuation allowance established for deferred tax assets at December 31, 2015 except for the valuation allowance established for charitable contribution carryforwards. At December 31, 2015, FNCB had $1.0 million in contribution carryforwards available. Unlike the expiration period for net operating loss carryforwards (generally 20 years) and AMT credit carryovers (indefinite), the expiration of an excess charitable contribution carryover occurs after the 5th succeeding tax year for which a charitable contribution is made. Management did not believe that enough positive evidence existed at that time to support the utilization of charitable contribution carryforwards in entirety before expiration at December 31, 2015. Accordingly, management believed a valuation allowance in the amount of $355 thousand was appropriate strictly in the case of the excess charitable contribution carryover deferred tax asset at December 31, 2015.
Management performed an evaluation of FNCB’s deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 taking into consideration all available positive and negative evidence at that time. Based on this evaluation, management believes that FNCB’s future taxable income will be sufficient to utilize the deferred tax assets. FNCB’s projected futureManagement anticipates that FNCB's core earnings will continue to support the utilization of NOL carryovers and recognition of the deferred tax assets based on future growth projections. Accordingly, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, including deferred tax assets related to excess charitable contribution carryovers, was not required at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Note 11.12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In conducting its business, FNCB has engaged in, and intends to continue to engage in, banking and financial transactions with directors, executive officers and their related parties.
FNCB has granted loans, letters of credit and lines of credit to directors, executive officers and their related parties. The following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of such outstanding loans, advances under lines of credit, net of any participations sold, as well as repayments during the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Balance January 1, | $ | 42,007 | $ | 52,652 | ||||
Additions, new loans and advances | 76,324 | 24,917 | ||||||
Repayments | (62,755 | ) | (35,513 | ) | ||||
Other (1) | - | (49 | ) | |||||
Balance December 31, | $ | 55,576 | $ | 42,007 | ||||
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Balance January 1, | $ | 77,896 | $ | 64,634 | ||||
Additions, new loans and advances | 79,325 | 93,871 | ||||||
Repayments | (58,286 | ) | (80,609 | ) | ||||
| Balance December 31, | $ | 98,935 | $ | 77,896 | ||||
At December 31, 2017,2020 and 2019 there were no0 loans made to directors, executive officers and their related parties that were not performing in accordance with the terms of the loan agreements. As of December 31, 2016, there was one loan relationship aggregating $381 thousand to a business partially owned by a director that was classified as “Special Mention”. Management had classified the loan relationship as special mention strictly because FNCB has not received current financial information from a non-related party to the loan agreements. During the first quarter of 2017, the required updated financial information had been received, and the loan relationship was no longer criticized.
On September 27, 2017, the Board of Directors of FNCB elected three new directors to the Board of Directors. The addition of the three directors and their related parties contributed $25.9 million of the $76.3 million in additions, new loans and advances during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Deposits from directors, executive officers and their related parties held by the Bank at December 31, 2020 2017and 20162019 amounted to $139.2$146.2 million and $119.3$84.1 million, respectively. Interest paid on the deposits amounted to $298$542 thousand in $196 thousand, and $276 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and $484 thousand in 2015,2019 respectively..
In the course of its operations, FNCB acquires goods and services from, and transacts business with, various companies of related parties, which include, but are not limited to, employee health insurance, fidelity bond and errors and omissions insurance, legal services, and repair of repossessed automobiles for resale. FNCB recorded payments to related parties for goods and services of $2.6 million, $2.62.0 million and $2.1$2.4 million in 2017,2016,2020 and 2015,2019, respectively.
The Notes held by directors and/or their related parties totaled $3.1 million at December 31, 2017 and $6.2 million at December 31, 2016. On December 1, 2016, FNCB accelerated a $4.0 million principal repayment, which was due and payable on September 1, 2017, of which $2.5 million was paid to directors and/or their related interests. On September 1, 2017, FNCB accelerated a $5.0 million principal repayment, which was due and payable on September 1, 2018, of which $3.1 million was paid to directors and/or their related interests.
The following table summarizes the activity related to FNCB’s subordinated debt for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
For the Year Ended | For the Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Related Party Subordinated Noteholders | Other Subordinated Noteholders | Total Subordinated Notes Outstanding | Related Party Subordinated Noteholders | Other Subordinated Noteholders | Total Subordinated Notes Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 6,171 | $ | 3,829 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 8,640 | $ | 5,360 | $ | 14,000 | ||||||||||||
Assignments | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Principal reductions | (3,085 | ) | (1,915 | ) | (5,000 | ) | (2,469 | ) | (1,531 | ) | (4,000 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 3,086 | $ | 1,914 | $ | 5,000 | $ | 6,171 | $ | 3,829 | $ | 10,000 | ||||||||||||
On March 1, 2016, FNCB paid $10.8 million in deferred and accrued interest on the Notes for a deferral period from September 1, 2010 through May 31, 2015, of which $3.9 million was paid to FNCB’s directors and/or their related parties. Regular quarterly interest payments on the Notes paid by FNCB to its directors and/or their related parties totaled $246 thousand in 2017 and $395 thousand in 2016. Interest expense recorded on the Notes for directors and/or their related parties amounted to $235 thousand and $386 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest accrued and unpaid on the Notes to directors and/or their related parties totaled $12 thousand at December 31, 2017 and $24 thousand at December 31, 2016.
Note 12.13. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND CONCENTRATIONS
Leases
At FNCB is obligated under operating leases for certain bank branches, office space, automobiles and equipment. Operating lease right of use ("ROU") assets represent FNCB's right to use an underlying asset during the lease term and operating liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments under the lease agreement. ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized at lease commencement based on the present value of the remaining lease payments using a discount rate that represents FNCB's incremental borrowings rate at the commencement date. ROU assets are included in other assets and operating lease liabilities are included in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. ROU assets and lease liabilities were $3.3 million and $3.6 million, respectively, at December 31, 20172020, FNCB was obligated under certain non-cancelable leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more. Minimum future obligations under non-cancelable leases in effect and $3.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017 2019.are as follows:
Minimum Future Lease Payments | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Facilities | Equipment | Total | |||||||||
2018 | $ | 323 | $ | 51 | $ | 374 | ||||||
2019 | 194 | 32 | 226 | |||||||||
2020 | 161 | 5 | 166 | |||||||||
2021 | 139 | - | 139 | |||||||||
2022 | 117 | - | 117 | |||||||||
2023 and thereafter | 177 | - | 177 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 1,111 | $ | 88 | $ | 1,199 | ||||||
Operating lease expense associated with bank branches and office space is included in occupancy expense, while operating lease expense associated with automobiles and office equipment are included in equipment expense in the consolidated statements of income. Total rental expense under leases amounted to $542 thousand, $456$408 thousand and $795$418 thousand, inrespectively, at 2017,December 31, 2020 2016and 2015,2019. respectively.
The following table summarizes the maturity of remaining operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020:
(in thousands) | December 31, 2020 | |||
2021 | $ | 375 | ||
2022 | 372 | |||
2023 | 364 | |||
2024 | 330 | |||
2025 | 335 | |||
2026 and thereafter | 2,742 | |||
Total lease payments | 4,518 | |||
Less: imputed interest | 937 | |||
Present value of operating lease liabilities | $ | 3,581 | ||
The following table presents other information related to FNCB's operating leases:
(dollars in thousands) | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | ||||||
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years) | 13.3 | 14.3 | ||||||
Weighted-average discount rate | 3.25 | % | 3.45 | % | ||||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | ||||||||
Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | 395 | $ | 385 | ||||
Financial Instruments with off-balance sheet commitments
FNCB is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit that involve varying degrees of credit, interest rate or liquidity risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. FNCB’s exposure to credit loss from nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk at December 31, 2020 2017and 20162019 are as follows:
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit | $ | 190,672 | $ | 150,111 | $ | 227,908 | $ | 275,891 | ||||||||
Standby letters of credit | 15,994 | 21,220 | 18,914 | 15,081 | ||||||||||||
In order to provide for probable losses inherent in these instruments, FNCB recorded reserves for unfunded commitments of $381613 thousand and $249$703 thousand at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, which were included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers in accordance with contractual provisions. These commitments usually are for specific periods or contain termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. The total amounts of unused commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that commitments often expire without being drawn upon.
Letters of credit and financial guarantees are agreements whereby FNCB guarantees the performance of a customer to a third party. Collateral may be required to support letters of credit in accordance with management’s evaluation of the creditworthiness of each customer. The credit exposure assumed in issuing letters of credit is essentially equal to that in other lending activities.
Federal Home Loan Bank — Mortgage Partnership Finance (“MPF”) Program
Under a secondary market loan servicing program with the FHLB, FNCB, in exchange for a monthly fee, provides a credit enhancement guarantee to the FHLB for foreclosure losses in excess of a defined First Loss Account (“FLA”) balance, up to specified amounts. At December 31, 202031,2017,, FNCB serviced payments on $10.8$21.6 million of first lien residential loan principal under these terms for the FHLB. At December 31, 202031,2017,, the maximum credit enhancement obligation for such guarantees by FNCB would be approximately $485$975 thousand if total foreclosure losses on the entire pool of loans exceed the FLA of approximately $53 thousand$64 thousand. During 2017, there was one loan that had been sold to the FHLB that FNCB was required to foreclose upon under the MPF program. Under the agreement, FNCB recognized a $55 thousand loss on the foreclosure and subsequent sale of the property, which is included in other losses in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2017.. There was no reserve established for this guarantee at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Cash Concentrations: The Bank maintains cash balances at several correspondent banks. FNCB engages in a primary correspondent banking relationship with Compass Bank. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, FNCB had balances with Compass Bank of $4.4million and $1.1 million, respectively. There were no other due from bank accounts in excess of the $250 thousand limit covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) at December 31, 2020 and 20120197. or December 31, 2016.
Loan Concentrations: FNCB attempts to limit its exposure to concentrations of credit risk by diversifying its loan portfolio and closely monitoring any concentrations of credit risk. The commercial real estate and construction, land acquisition and development portfolios comprise $282.8$333.7 million, or 36.8%36.9% of gross loans at December 31, 2017.2020. Geographic concentrations exist because FNCB provides its services in its primary market area of Northeastern Pennsylvania and conducts limited activities outside of that area. FNCB had loans and loan commitments secured by real estate outside of its primary market area of $15.5$47.4 million, or 2.0%5.2%,of gross loans at December 31, 2017.2020.
FNCB considers an industry concentration within the loan portfolio to exist if the aggregate loan balance outstanding for that industry exceeds 25.0% of capital. The following table summarizes the concentrationsconcentration within FNCB’s loan portfolio by industry at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Amount | Gross Loans | Amount | Gross Loans | ||||||||||||
Retail space/shopping centers | $ | 44,184 | 5.75 | % | $ | 38,573 | 5.27 | % | ||||||||
1-4 family residential investment properties | 33,275 | 4.33 | % | 24,413 | 3.34 | % | ||||||||||
Automobile dealers | 22,792 | 2.97 | % | 31,989 | 4.37 | % | ||||||||||
December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Amount | Gross Loans | Amount | Gross Loans | ||||||||||||
Retail space/shopping centers | $ | 43,926 | 4.86 | % | $ | 43,865 | 5.31 | % | ||||||||
1-4 family residential investment properties | 58,114 | 6.43 | % | 38,122 | 4.61 | % | ||||||||||
Litigation
On May 24, 2012, a putative shareholder filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas for Lackawanna County (“Shareholder Derivative Suit”) against certain present and former directors and officers of FNCB (the “Individual Defendants”) alleging, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, corporate waste, and unjust enrichment. FNCB was named as a nominal defendant. On February 4, 2014, the Court issued a Final Order and Judgment for the matter granting approval of a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Settlement”) and dismissing all claims against FNCB and the Individual Defendants. As part of the Settlement, without admitting any fault, wrongdoing or liability, the Individual Defendants agreed to settle the derivative litigation for $5.0 million. The $5.0 million Settlement payment was made to FNCB on March 28, 2014. The Individual Defendants reserved their rights to indemnification under FNCB’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, resolutions adopted by the Board, the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law and any and all rights they have against FNCB’s and the Bank’s insurance carriers. In addition, in conjunction with the Settlement, FNCB accrued $2.5 million related to fees and costs of the plaintiff’s attorneys, which was included in non-interest expense in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2013. On April 1, 2014, FNCB paid the $2.5 million related to fees and costs of the plaintiff’s attorneys and partial indemnification of the Individual Defendants in the amount of $2.5 million. On July 1, 2017, FNCB continued to make partial indemnification to the Individual Defendants by commencing monthly principal payments, on behalf of the Individual Defendants, of $25,000 plus accrued interest due to First Northern Bank and Trust Co. As of December 31, 2017, $2.5 million plus accrued interest remains accrued in other liabilities related to the potential indemnification of the Individual Defendants.
On September 5, 2012, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (“F&D”) filed an action against FNCB and the Bank, as well as several current and former officers and directors of FNCB, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. F&D has asserted a claim for the rescission of a directors’ and officers’ insurance policy and a bond that it had issued to FNCB. On November 9, 2012, FNCB and the Bank answered the claim and asserted counterclaims for the losses and expenses already incurred by FNCB and the Bank. FNCB and the other defendants are defending the claims and have opposed F&D’s requested relief by way of counterclaims, breaches of contract and bad faith claims against F&D for its failure to fulfill its obligations to FNCB and the Bank under the insurance policy. Discovery is complete and the parties have exchanged expert reports. Dispositive motions have been submitted by the parties and the Court heard oral arguments on the motions on August 9, 2017. FNCB is awaiting the Court’s rulings on the dispositive motions. At this time, FNCB cannot reasonably determine the outcome of potential range of loss, if any, in connection with this matter.
On February 16, 2017, FNCB and the Bank entered into a Class Action Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) in the matters filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County to Steven Antonik, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Linda Kluska, William R. Howells and Louise A. Howells, Summer Benjamin, and Joshua Silfee, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated vs. First National Community Bancorp, Inc. and First National Community Bank, Civil Action No.2013-CV-4438 and Charles Saxe, III, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. First National Community Bank No.2013-CV-5071 (collectively, the “Actions”). By entering into this Settlement Agreement, the parties to the Actions have resolved the claims made in the complaints to their mutual satisfaction. FNCB has not admitted to the validity of any claims or allegations and denies any liability in the claims made and the Plaintiffs have not admitted that any claims or allegations lack merit or foundation. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the parties have agreed to the following: 1) FNCB is to pay the Plaintiffs’ class members the aggregate sum of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000) (an amount which FNCB recorded as a liability and corresponding expense in its 2015 operating results); 2) Plaintiffs shall release all claims against FNCB related to the Actions; 3) FNCB shall move to vacate or satisfy any judgments against any class members arising from the vehicle loans that are the subject of the Actions; and 4) FNCB shall waive the deficiency balance of each class member and remove the trade lines on each class members’ credit report associated with the subject vehicle loans that are at issue in the Actions for Experian, Equifax, and Transunion. The Settlement Agreement provides for an Incentive Award for the representative Plaintiffs and an award to Plaintiffs’ counsel of attorney’s fees and reimbursement of expenses in connection with their roles in these Actions, subject to Court approval. The Settlement Agreement was preliminarily approved by Court Order on February 16, 2017. On March 2, 2017, FNCB paid the Settlement Administrator $750,000 pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement received final Court approval on May 31, 2017. Additionally, in association with the subject vehicle loans, FNCB has completed the removal of trade lines on each class members' credit report and has substantially completed satisfying judgments, where applicable, in favor of class members. As previously mentioned above and in connection with the primary terms of the tentative settlement agreement entered by Order of Court on December 17, 2015, FNCB recorded a liability and corresponding expense in the amount of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand ($750,000), which was included in FNCB’s 2015 operating results.
FNCB has been subject to tax audits, and is also a party to routine litigation involving various aspects of its business, such as employment practice claims, workers compensation claims, claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which FNCB holds security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to its business, none of which has or is expected to have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of FNCB.
Note 13.14. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS/SUBSEQUENT EVENTPLANS
FNCB had an Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”), where options were granted to key officers and other employees of FNCB. The aggregate number of shares authorized to be issued upon exercise of the options under the Stock Incentive Plan could not exceed 1,100,000 shares. Options and rights granted under the Stock Incentive Plan became exercisable six months after the date the options were awarded and expire ten years after the award date. Upon exercise, the shares are issued from FNCB’s authorized but unissued stock. The Stock Incentive Plan expired on August 30, 2010. Accordingly, no further grants have been, or will be, made under the Stock Incentive Plan. No compensation expense related to options under the Stock Incentive Plan was required to be recorded in each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
The following table summarizes the status of FNCB’s Stock Incentive Plan:
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Exercise | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Shares | Price | Shares | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock options outstanding at the beginning of the year | 37,700 | $ | 13.15 | 50,746 | $ | 15.20 | 64,479 | $ | 15.87 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (18,500 | ) | 15.58 | (13,046 | ) | 21.14 | (13,733 | ) | 18.33 | |||||||||||||||
Stock options outstanding at the end of the year | 19,200 | $ | 10.81 | 37,700 | $ | 13.15 | 50,746 | $ | 15.20 | |||||||||||||||
Options exercisable at year end | 19,200 | $ | 10.81 | 37,700 | $ | 13.15 | 50,746 | $ | 15.20 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2017,2016 and 2015, the exercisable options had no total intrinsic value and there was no unrecognized compensation expense.
The following table presents information pertaining to options outstanding at December 31,2017:
Options Outstanding | Options Excercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Contractual | Exercise | Number | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||||
| Range of Exercise Price | Outstanding | Life | Price | Exercisable | Price | |||||||||||||||||
| $10.81 | 19,200 | 1.01 | $ | 10.81 | 19,200 | $ | 10.81 | |||||||||||||||
On November 25, 2015, the Board of Directors adopted a 2015 Employee Stock Grant Plan (the “2015 Stock Grant Plan”) under which shares of common stock not to exceed 13,550 were authorized to be granted to employees. On November 25, 2015, FNCB granted 50 shares of its common stock to each active full and part time employee. There were 13,300 shares granted under the 2015 Stock Grant Plan at a fair value of $5.15 per share. The total cost of this grant, which was included in salary expense in the consolidated statements of income, amounted to $68 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2015. No additional shares were granted under this plan. There were no such plans adopted in 2017 or 2016.
FNCB has a Long TermLong-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (“LTIP”) for executivesdirectors, executive officers and certain key employees. The LTIP authorizes up to 1,200,000 shares of common stock for issuance and provides the Board of Directors with the authority to offer several different types of long-term incentives, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units and performance shares. The Board of Directors granted awards, comprised solely of shares of restricted stock, to executives and certain key employees under the terms of the LTIP which were comprised solely of 75,924 shares in 2020 and 57,684 shares in 2019.
The following table summarizes the activity related to FNCB’s unvested restricted stock of 54,549 shares, 67,600 shares and 84,900 shares forawards during the years ended December 31, 2017,2020 2016and 2015,2019 respectively. At December 31, 2017, .there were 977,619 shares of common stock available for award under the LTIP.
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||
Restricted | Grant Date | Restricted | Grant Date | |||||||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | Shares | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock awards at January 1, | 128,150 | $ | 7.76 | 114,702 | $ | 7.50 | ||||||||||
Awards granted | 75,924 | 6.07 | 57,684 | 7.64 | ||||||||||||
Forfeitures | (5,741 | ) | 6.64 | (6,678 | ) | 7.61 | ||||||||||
Vestings | (38,420 | ) | 7.48 | (37,558 | ) | 6.80 | ||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock awards at December 31, | 159,913 | $ | 7.07 | 128,150 | $ | 7.76 | ||||||||||
For the years ended December 31, 2017,2020 2016,and 2015,2019, stock-based compensation expense, which is included in salaries and benefits expense in the consolidated statements of income, totaled $336 thousand in $3012020 and $255 thousand in $2652019 thousand and $247 thousand, respectively.. Total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards at December 31, 2017,2020 2016,and 20152019 was $472 thousand, $396$896 thousand and $453$809 thousand, respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested shares of restricted stock is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.4 years.
On MarchJuly 1, 2018,2020 an additionaland 56,8292019, 2,555 shares and 1,956 shares, respectively, of FNCB's common stock were granted under the LTIP to each of the Bank's ten non-employee directors. The total number of shares granted to the directors were 25,550 in 2020 and 19,560 in 2020. The shares of restrictedcommon stock immediately vested to each director upon grant, and the fair value per share on the grant date was $5.87 for the 2020 grant and $7.67 for the 2019 grant. Directors fees totaling $150 thousand associated with these grants was recognized on both July 1, 2020 and 2019 and included in other operating expense in the consolidated statements of income for December 31, 2020 and 2019. At December 31, 2020, there were awarded756,387 shares of common stock available for award under the LTIP.
The following table summarizes the activity related to FNCB’s unvested restricted stock awards during the year ended December 31, 2017.
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted | Grant Date | Restricted | Grant Date | Restricted | Grant Date | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | Shares | Fair Value | Shares | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Unvested unrestricted stock awards at January 1, | 103,874 | $ | 5.74 | 112,958 | $ | 5.99 | 45,750 | $ | 6.70 | |||||||||||||||
Awards granted | 54,549 | 6.83 | 67,600 | 5.53 | 84,900 | 5.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeitures | (5,416 | ) | 5.73 | (23,836 | ) | 5.69 | (1,166 | ) | 6.70 | |||||||||||||||
Vestings | (46,878 | ) | 5.90 | (52,848 | ) | 6.02 | (16,526 | ) | 6.70 | |||||||||||||||
Unvested unrestricted stock awards at December 31, | 106,129 | $ | 6.23 | 103,874 | $ | 5.74 | 112,958 | $ | 5.99 | |||||||||||||||
Note 14.15. REGULATORY MATTERS/SUBSEQUENT EVENTEVENTS
On January 28, 2019, FNCB’s announced that it had commenced a public offering of its shares of common stock in a firm commitment underwritten offering. The offering closed on February 8, 2019, FNCB issued 3,285,550 shares of its common stock, which included 428,550 shares of common stock issued upon the exercise in full of the option to purchase additional shares granted to underwriters, at a public offering price of $7.00 per share, less an underwriting discount of $0.35 per share. FNCB received net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses of $21.3 million. Following the receipt of the proceeds during the first quarter of 2019, FNCB made a capital investment in FNCB Bank, it's wholly-owned subsidiary of $17.8 million.
FNCB’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders, or repurchase shares of its common stock, is largely dependent on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to FNCB. Bank regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid, or shares that may be repurchased, without prior approval of the Bank’s regulatory agency. Cash dividends declared and paid by FNCB during 20172020 and 20162019 were $0.13$0.22per share and $0.09$0.20 per share, respectively. On April 27, 2016, the Board of Directors approved the reinstatement of theFNCB offers a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRP”plan ("DRP") which became effective on June 1, 2016. Effective July 1, 2017, shares acquired underto its shareholders. For the DRPyears ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 dividend reinvestment shares were purchased in open market transactions. Previously, FNCB issuedHowever, shares under the optional cash purchase feature of the DRP were issued from authorized but unissued common shares. Shares of common stock issued under the DRP totaled 65,24010,271 and 78,7527,369 for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Subsequent to December 31, 2017,2020, on January 31, 2018,27, 2021, FNCB declared a $0.04$0.06 per share dividend payable on March 15, 20182021 to shareholders of record on March 1, 2018.2021.
On January 27, 2021, FNCB's Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which up to 975,000 shares of FNCB's outstanding common stock may be acquired in the open market commencing no earlier than February 3, 2021 and expiring December 31, 2021 pursuant to a trading plan that was adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Under the program shares will be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market transactions depending upon market conditions and administered through an independent broker. Repurchases are subject to SEC regulations as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the trading plan. Under the program, the purchases will be funded from available working capital presently available to FNCB, and the repurchased shares will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. There isnot a guarantee as to the exact number of shares that will be repurchased by FNCB, and FNCB may discontinue purchases at any time that management determines additional repurchases are no longer warranted.
The Company is considered a small bank holding company and is exempt from risk-based capital and leverage rules, including Basel III. FNCB and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material adverse effect on FNCB’sFNCB’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, FNCB and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of FNCB's and the Bank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices must be met. Capitalpractices. FNCB's and the Bank's capital amounts, and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
In Management believes, as of July 2013, December 31, 2020the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC approved the final Basel III capital framework for U.S. banking organizations (the “Regulatory Capital Rules”) implementing regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Regulatory Capital Rules were effective on January 1, 2014; however, the mandatory compliance date for, that FNCB and the Bank as “standardized approach” banking organizations began on January 1, 2015 and is subject to transitional provisions extending to January 1, 2019. The Regulatory Capital Rules include new risk-basedmeet all applicable capital and leverage ratios and refine the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The new minimum capital level requirements applicable to FNCB and the Bank under the Regulatory Capital Rules are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Regulatory Capital Rules, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity Tier I capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets. The capital conservation buffer requirement began on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase by that amount each year until fully phased in on January 1, 2019 at 2.50%.
The Regulatory Capital Rules also included revisions and clarifications consistent with Basel III regarding the various components of Tier I capital, including common equity, unrealized gains and losses, as well as certain instruments that will no longer qualify as Tier I capital, some of which will be phased out over time. Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to common equity Tier I capital began on January 1, 2015, and will be phased-in over a four-year period (beginning at 40% on January 1, 2015, 60% on January 1, 2016 and an additional 20% per year thereafter). On November 21, 2017, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC approved a revision to the Regulatory Capital Rules to suspend the phase-in of certain deductions and other adjustments to common equity Tier I capital. The updated final rule applies to non-advanced approaches banking organizations and is effective on January 1, 2018. FNCB and the Bank were in full compliance with the additional capital conservation buffer requirement at December 31, 2017.adequacy requirements.
The Regulatory Capital Rules also revised the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including the Bank, if their capital levels begin to show signs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, effective January 1, 2015, the Regulatory Capital Rules set forth certain changes for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, which were required to be utilized beginning January 1, 2015. The provisions applicable to banking organizations under the “standardized approach” include changes with respect to risk weights for commercial real estate loans, past due exposures and conversion factors for commitments with an original maturity of one year or less.
Current quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require FNCB Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of totalTotal capital, Tier I capital, and Tier I common equity (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). The following tables present summary information regarding FNCB’s and the Bank’s risk-based capital and related ratios at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNCB Bank | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes with Conservation Buffer | Minimum Required To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations | |||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) | $ | 149,173 | 15.79 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.50 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) | 137,356 | 14.54 | % | 6.00 | % | 8.50 | % | 8.00 | % | |||||||||||
Tier I common equity (to risk-weighted assets) | 137,356 | 14.54 | % | 4.50 | % | 7.00 | % | 6.50 | % | |||||||||||
Tier I capital (to average assets) | 137,356 | 9.57 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||
Total risk-weighted assets | 944,546 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total average assets | 1,434,776 | |||||||||||||||||||
FNCB Bank | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes with Conservation Buffer | Minimum Required To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations | |||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) | $ | 133,406 | 14.77 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.50 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) | 123,753 | 13.70 | % | 6.00 | % | 8.50 | % | 8.00 | % | |||||||||||
Tier I common equity (to risk-weighted assets) | 123,753 | 13.70 | % | 4.50 | % | 7.00 | % | 6.50 | % | |||||||||||
Tier I capital (to average assets) | 123,753 | 10.36 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||
Total risk-weighted assets | 903,172 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total average assets | 1,194,789 | |||||||||||||||||||
Company | Bank | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes with Conservation Buffer | To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) | $ | 96,827 | 12.06 | % | $ | 102,786 | 12.81 | % | 8.00 | % | 8.625 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) | 82,159 | 10.23 | % | 94,118 | 11.73 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.625 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier I common equity (to risk-weighted assets) | 80,049 | 9.97 | % | 94,118 | 11.73 | % | 4.50 | % | 5.125 | % | 6.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier I capital (to average assets) | 82,159 | 7.53 | % | 94,118 | 8.63 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.000 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total risk-weighted assets | 803,026 | 802,610 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total average assets | 1,090,665 | 1,090,550 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note 15.16. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
In determining fair value, FNCB uses various valuation approaches, including market, income and cost approaches. Accounting standards establish a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, which are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of FNCB. Unobservable inputs reflect FNCB’s knowledge about the assumptions the market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, which are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). A financial asset or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
● | Level 1 valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted market prices for identical instruments traded in active |
● | Level 2 valuation is based upon quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by market data; and |
● | Level 3 valuation is derived from other valuation methodologies including discounted cash flow models and similar techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in determining fair value. |
A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets recorded at fair value, and for estimating fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value, is set forth below.
Cash, Short-term Investments, Accrued Interest Receivable and Accrued Interest Payable
For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Available-for-Sale Debt Securities
The estimated fair values of available-for-sale equity securities are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized exchanges (Level 1 inputs). The estimated fair values for FNCB’s investments in obligations of U.S. government agencies, obligations of state and political subdivisions, government-sponsored agency CMOs and mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt securities,private collateralized mortgage obligations, asset-backed securities and negotiable certificates of deposit are obtained by FNCB from a nationally-recognized pricing service. This pricing service develops estimated fair values by analyzing like securities and applying available market information through processes such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing (Level 2 inputs), to prepare valuations. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include, among other things, dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, and are based on market data obtained from sources independent from FNCB. The Level 2 investments in FNCB’s portfolio are priced using those inputs that, based on the analysis prepared by the pricing service, reflect the assumptions that market participants would use to price the assets. Management has determined that the Level 2 designation is appropriate for these securities because, as with most fixed-income securities, those in FNCB’s portfolio are not exchange-traded, and such non-exchange-traded fixed income securities are typically priced by correlation to observed market data. FNCB has reviewed the pricing service’s methodology to confirm its understanding that such methodology results in a valuation based on quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted markets for identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which the significant assumptions can be corroborated by market data as appropriate to a Level 2 designation.
For those securities for which the inputs used by an independent pricing service were derived from unobservable marketmarket information, FNCB evaluated the appropriateness and quality of each price. Management reviewed the volume and level of activity for all classes of securities and attempted to identify transactions which may not be orderly or reflective of a significant level of activity and volume. For securities meeting these criteria, the quoted prices received from either market participants or an independent pricing service may be adjusted, as necessary, to estimate fair value (fair values based on Level 3 inputs). If applicable, the adjustment to fair value was derived based on present value cash flow model projections obtained from third party providers using assumptions similar to those incorporated by market participants.
At December 31, 2017,2020, FNCB ownedthreeeighteen corporate debt securities with an aggregate amortized cost and fair value of $4.0$23.8 million and $4.1$24.6million, respectively. The market for theseten of the eighteen corporate debt securities at December 31, 20172020 was not active and markets for similar securities are also were not active. FNCB obtained valuations for these securities from a third-party service provider that prepared the valuations using a discounted cash flow approach. Management takes measures to validate the service provider’s analysis and is actively involved in the valuation process, including reviewing and verifying the assumptions used in the valuation calculations. Results of a discounted cash flow test are significantly affected by variables such as the estimate of the probability of default, estimates of future cash flows, discount rates, prepayment rates and the creditworthiness of the underlying issuers. FNCB considers these inputs to be unobservable Level 3 inputs because they are based on estimates about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing this type of asset and developed based on the best information available in the circumstances rather than on observable inputs. As it relates to fair value measurements, once each issuer is categorized and the forecasted default rates have been applied, the expected cash flows are modeled using the variables described above. Discount rates ranging from5.58%3.99% to 6.33%5.07% were applied to the expected cash flows to estimate fair value. Management will continue to monitor the market for these securities to assess the market activity and the availability of observable inputs and will continue to apply these controls and procedures to the valuations received from its third-party service provider for the period it continues to use an outside valuation service.
LoansEquity Securities
Except for collateral-dependent impaired loans,The estimated fair values of loansequity securities are estimateddetermined by discounting the projected future cash flows using market discount rates that reflect the credit, liquidity, and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. Projected future cash flowsobtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized exchanges (Level 1 inputs).
Derivative Contracts
FNCB's derivative liabilities are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. The estimated fair value of collateral dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised loan value or other reasonable offers less estimated costs to sell. FNCB does not record loansreported at fair value onutilizing Level 2 inputs. Values of these instruments are obtained through an independent pricing source utilizing information which may include market observed quotations for swaps, LIBOR rates, forward rates and rate volatility. Derivative contracts create exposure to interest rate movements a recurring basis. Howeverswell as risks from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for credit losses is established. The specific reserves for collateral dependent impaired loans are based on the fair valuepotential of non-performance of the collateral less estimated costs to sell. The fair value of the collateral is generally based on appraisals. In some cases, adjustments are made to the appraised values due to various factors including age of the appraisal, age of comparables included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and in the collateral. When significant adjustments are based on unobservable inputs, the resulting fair value measurement is categorized as a Level 3 measurement.
Loans Held For Salecounterparty.
Fair values
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present the financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2020 2017and 2016,2019, and the fair value hierarchy of the respective valuation techniques utilized to determine the fair value:
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Significant | Significant | Quoted Prices | Significant | Significant | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in Active Markets | Observable | Unobservable | in Active Markets | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | for Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Fair Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Fair Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 145,999 | - | 145,999 | - | $ | 205,828 | $ | 0 | $ | 205,828 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | 35,657 | - | 35,657 | - | 56,972 | 0 | 56,972 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | 75,418 | - | 75,418 | - | 3,904 | 0 | 3,904 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 22,311 | - | 22,311 | - | 13,026 | 0 | 13,026 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | 38,199 | 0 | 38,199 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 4,058 | - | - | 4,058 | 24,580 | 0 | 8,156 | 16,424 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 3,086 | - | 3,086 | - | 7,526 | 0 | 7,526 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | 2,930 | - | 2,930 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 928 | 928 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 290,387 | $ | 928 | $ | 285,401 | $ | 4,058 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale debt securities | 350,035 | 0 | 333,612 | 16,424 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities, at fair value | 3,026 | 3,026 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total financial assets | $ | 353,084 | $ | 3,026 | $ | 333,635 | $ | 16,424 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | $ | 143 | $ | 0 | $ | 143 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total financial liabilities | $ | 143 | $ | 0 | $ | 143 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Significant | Significant | Quoted Prices | Significant | Significant | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in Active Markets | Observable | Unobservable | in Active Markets | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | for Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Fair Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Fair Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government agencies | $ | 12,188 | $ | - | $ | 12,188 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 117,873 | - | 117,873 | - | $ | 117,763 | $ | 0 | $ | 117,763 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government/government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential | 18,084 | - | 18,084 | - | 80,294 | 0 | 80,294 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations - commercial | 99,350 | - | 99,350 | - | 17,723 | 0 | 17,723 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 20,576 | - | 20,576 | - | 18,485 | 0 | 18,485 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | 25,075 | 0 | 25,075 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 3,792 | - | 453 | 3,339 | 7,182 | 0 | 2,032 | 5,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | - | - | - | - | 5,621 | 0 | 5,621 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Negotiable certificates of deposit | 3,216 | - | 3,216 | - | 696 | 0 | 696 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 936 | 936 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 276,015 | $ | 936 | $ | 271,740 | $ | 3,339 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale debt securities | 272,839 | 0 | 267,689 | 5,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Securities, at fair value | 920 | 920 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total financial assets | $ | 273,759 | $ | 920 | $ | 267,689 | $ | 5,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNCB did not have any financial liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2019. There were no transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2020 2017and 2016.2019.
The following table presents a reconciliation and statement of operations classification of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), which consisted entirely of corporate debt securities, for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||
Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||
Corporate Debt Securities | ||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Balance at January 1, | $ | 5,150 | $ | 3,929 | ||||
Additions | 11,800 | 1,000 | ||||||
Redemptions | (1,015 | ) | 0 | |||||
Sales | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized): | ||||||||
Included in earnings | 15 | 0 | ||||||
Included in other comprehensive income | 474 | 221 | ||||||
Balance at December 31, | $ | 16,424 | $ | 5,150 | ||||
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||
Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||
Corporate Debt Securities | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Balance at January 1, | $ | 3,339 | $ | 3,269 | ||||
Additions | 2,000 | - | ||||||
Payments received | - | - | ||||||
Sales | (1,268 | ) | - | |||||
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized): | ||||||||
Included in earnings | 268 | - | ||||||
Included in other comprehensive income | (281 | ) | 70 | |||||
Balance at December 31, | $ | 4,058 | $ | 3,339 | ||||
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The following tables present assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2020 2017and 2016,2019, and additional quantitative information about the valuation techniques and inputs utilized by FNCB to determine fair value. All such assets and liabilities were measured using Level 3 inputs.
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurement | Quantitative Information | Fair Value Measurement | Quantitative Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Valuation | Fair | Valuation | Unobservable | Value/ | Recorded | Valuation | Fair | Valuation | Unobservable | Value/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Investment | Allowance | Value | Technique | Inputs | Range | Investment | Allowance | Value | Technique | Inputs | Range | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans - collateral dependent | $ | 1,262 | $ | 636 | $ | 626 | Appraisal of collateral | Selling costs | 10.0% | $ | 4,244 | $ | 218 | $ | 4,026 | Appraisal of collateral | Selling costs | 10.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans - other | 4,578 | 137 | 4,441 | Discounted cash flows | Discount rate | 3.7% | - | 7.5% | 7,491 | 198 | 7,293 | Discounted cash flows | Discount rate | 3.00% | - | 8.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned | 1,023 | - | 1,023 | Appraisal of collateral | Selling costs | 10.0% | 58 | 0 | 58 | Appraisal of collateral | Selling costs | 10.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurement | Quantitative Information | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Valuation | Fair | Valuation | Unobservable | Value/ | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Investment | Allowance | Value | Technique | Inputs | Range | |||||||||||||||
Impaired loans - collateral dependent | $ | 482 | $ | 68 | $ | 414 | Appraisal of collateral | Selling costs | 10.0% | ||||||||||||
Impaired loans - other | 3,247 | 234 | 3,013 | Discounted cash flows | Discount rate | 3.0% | - | 7.5% | |||||||||||||
Other real estate owned | 1,949 | - | 1,949 | Appraisal of collateral | Selling costs | 10.0% | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurement | Quantitative Information | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Valuation | Fair | Valuation | Unobservable | Value/ | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Investment | Allowance | Value | Technique | Inputs | Range | |||||||||||||||
Impaired loans - collateral dependent | $ | 7,721 | $ | 376 | $ | 7,345 | Appraisal of collateral | Selling costs | 10.0% | ||||||||||||
Impaired loans - other | 8,065 | 97 | 7,968 | Discounted cash flows | Discount rate | 3.99% | - | 7.49 | % | ||||||||||||
Other real estate owned | 289 | 0 - | 289 | Appraisal of collateral | Selling costs | 10.0% | |||||||||||||||
The fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is determined through independent appraisals or other reasonable offers, which generally include various Level 3 inputs which are not identifiable. Management reduces the appraised value by the estimated costs to sell the property and may make adjustments to the appraised values as necessary to consider any declines in real estate values since the time of the appraisal. For impaired loans that are not collateral-dependent, fair value is determined using the discounted cash flow method. When the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the impairment is recorded through a valuation allowance or is charged off. The amount shown is the balance of impaired loans, net of any charge-offs and the related allowance for loan losses.
OREO properties are recorded at fair value less the estimated cost to sell at the date of FNCB’s acquisition of the property. Subsequent to acquisition of the property, the balance may be written down further. It is FNCB’s policy to obtain certified external appraisals of real estate collateral underlying impaired loans and OREO, and estimate fair value using those appraisals. Other valuation sources may be used, including broker price opinions, letters of intent and executed sale agreements.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of FNCB’s financial instruments at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. FNCB discloses fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the statements of financial condition, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The fair value of financial instruments that are not measured at fair value in the financial statements were based on exit price notion. The following estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, management judgment is required to interpret data and develop fair value estimates. Accordingly, the estimates below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts FNCB could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Fair Value | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Measurement | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and short term investments | Level 1 | $ | 155,811 | $ | 155,811 | $ | 34,565 | $ | 34,565 | |||||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities | See previous table | 350,035 | 350,035 | 272,839 | 272,839 | |||||||||||||
Equity securities | Level 1 | 3,026 | 3,026 | 920 | 920 | |||||||||||||
Restricted stock | Level 2 | 1,745 | 1,745 | 3,804 | 3,804 | |||||||||||||
Loans held for sale | Level 2 | 2,107 | 2,107 | 1,061 | 1,061 | |||||||||||||
| Loans, net | Level 3 | 889,152 | 891,880 | 819,529 | 810,074 | |||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | Level 2 | 4,286 | 4,286 | 3,234 | 3,234 | |||||||||||||
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values | Level 3 | 500 | 500 | 1,658 | 1,658 | |||||||||||||
Servicing rights | Level 3 | 324 | 479 | 356 | 790 | |||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | Level 2 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Deposits | Level 2 | 1,287,448 | 1,288,567 | 1,001,709 | 1,001,829 | |||||||||||||
| Borrowed funds | Level 2 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 57,219 | 57,234 | |||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable | Level 2 | 108 | 108 | 258 | 258 | |||||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities | Level 2 | 135 | 143 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Fair Value | December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Measurement | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and short term investments | Level 1 | $ | 37,746 | $ | 37,746 | $ | 112,445 | $ | 112,445 | |||||||||
Securities available for sale | See previous table | 290,387 | 290,387 | 276,015 | 276,015 | |||||||||||||
FHLB of Pittsburgh stock | Level 2 | 2,753 | 2,753 | 3,311 | 3,311 | |||||||||||||
Loans held for sale | Level 2 | 1,095 | 1,095 | 596 | 596 | |||||||||||||
Loans, net | Level 3 | 761,609 | 752,222 | 722,860 | 712,263 | |||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | Level 2 | 3,234 | 3,234 | 2,757 | 2,757 | |||||||||||||
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values | Level 3 | 1,658 | 1,658 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | Level 3 | 265 | 774 | 215 | 744 | |||||||||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | Level 2 | 1,002,448 | 962,586 | 1,015,139 | 968,904 | |||||||||||||
Borrowed funds | Level 2 | 60,278 | 60,214 | 78,847 | 78,923 | |||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable | Level 2 | 241 | 241 | 242 | 242 | |||||||||||||
Note 16.17. EARNINGS PER SHARE
For FNCB, the numerator of both the basic and diluted earnings per share of common stock is net income available to common shareholders. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in the denominator for basic earnings per common share is increased to determine the denominator used for diluted earnings per common share by the effect of potentially dilutive common share equivalents utilizing the treasury stock method. Common share equivalents are outstanding stock options to purchase FNCB’s shares of common stock and unvested restricted stock.
The following table presents the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per share of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 147 | $ | 6,309 | $ | 35,840 | ||||||
Basic weighted-average number of common stock outstanding | 16,722,966 | 16,571,262 | 16,499,622 | |||||||||
Plus: common share equivalents | 17,322 | 1,433 | - | |||||||||
Diluted weighted-average number of common stock outstanding | 16,740,288 | 16,572,695 | 16,499,622 | |||||||||
Income per share of common stock: | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 2.17 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 2.17 | ||||||
For each of the years ended December 31, 2020 2017,2016and 2015,2019 common stock equivalents reflected in the table above were related entirely to the incremental shares of unvested restricted stock. Stock options
The following table presents the calculation of 19,200 shares, 37,700 shares,both basic and 50,746 shares, respectivelydiluted earnings per share of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2017,2020 2016and 20152019 were excluded from common stock equivalents. The exercise prices of stock options exceeded the average market price of FNCB’s common stock during the periods presented; therefore, inclusion of these common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive to the diluted earnings per share of common stock calculation.:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 15,347 | $ | 11,075 | ||||
Basic weighted-average number of common stock outstanding | 20,210,439 | 19,802,095 | ||||||
Plus: common share equivalents | 1,747 | 5,497 | ||||||
Diluted weighted-average number of common stock outstanding | 20,212,187 | 19,807,592 | ||||||
Income per share of common stock: | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.56 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.56 | ||||
Note 17.18. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following tables summarize the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive(loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2017,2020 2016and 2015.2019.
For the year Ended December 31, 2017 | For the year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||
Amount Reclassified | Amount Reclassified | ||||||||||
from Accumulated | Affected Line Item | from Accumulated | Affected Line Item | ||||||||
Other Comprehensive | in the Consolidated | Other Comprehensive | in the Consolidated | ||||||||
(in thousands) | Income (Loss) | Statements of Income | Income (Loss) | Statements of Income | |||||||
Available-for-sale securities: | |||||||||||
Net gains on sale of securities reclassified into net income | $ | (1,597 | ) | Net gain on sale of securities | |||||||
Available-for-sale debt securities: | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains reclassified into net income | $ | (1,528 | ) | Net gain on the sale of available-for-sale securities | |||||||
Taxes | 543 | Income tax expense (benefit) | 321 | Income taxes | |||||||
Net of tax amount | $ | (1,054 | ) | $ | (1,207 | ) | |||||
For the year Ended December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Amount Reclassified | ||||||
from Accumulated | Affected Line Item | |||||
Other Comprehensive | in the Consolidated | |||||
(in thousands) | Income (Loss) | Statements of Income | ||||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||
Net gains on sale of securities reclassified into net income | $ | (960 | ) | Net gain on sale of securities | ||
Taxes | 326 | Income tax expense (benefit) | ||||
Net of tax amount | $ | (634 | ) | |||
For the year Ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||
Amount Reclassified | ||||||
from Accumulated | Affected Line Item | |||||
Other Comprehensive | in the Consolidated | |||||
(in thousands) | Income (Loss) | Statements of Income | ||||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||
Net gains on sale of securities reclassified into net income | $ | (2,296 | ) | Net gain on sale of securities | ||
Taxes | 781 | Income tax expense (benefit) | ||||
Net of tax amount | $ | (1,515 | ) | |||
For the year Ended December 31, 2019 | |||||
Amount Reclassified | |||||
from Accumulated | Affected Line Item | ||||
Other Comprehensive | in the Consolidated | ||||
(in thousands) | Income (Loss) | Statements of Income | |||
Available-for-sale debt securities: | |||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains reclassified into net income | $ | (1,227 | ) | Net gain on the sale of available-for-sale securities | |
Taxes | 258 | Income taxes | |||
Net of tax amount | $ | (969 | ) | ||
The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) income,, net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 2020 2017,2016and 2015:2019:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Balance, January 1, | $ | 3,056 | $ | (4,540 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | 12,037 | 8,565 | ||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | (1,207 | ) | (969 | ) | ||||
Net other comprehensive income during the period | 10,830 | 7,596 | ||||||
Balance, December 31, | $ | 13,886 | $ | 3,056 | ||||
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Balance, January 1, | $ | (1,560 | ) | $ | (61 | ) | $ | 1,138 | ||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications | 1,156 | (865 | ) | 316 | ||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | (1,054 | ) | (634 | ) | (1,515 | ) | ||||||
Net other comprehensive (loss) income during the period | 102 | (1,499 | ) | (1,199 | ) | |||||||
Reclassification of stranded tax effects upon adoption of ASU 2018-2 | (287 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Balance, December 31, | $ | (1,745 | ) | $ | (1,560 | ) | $ | (61 | ) | |||
Note 18.19. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION — PARENT COMPANY ONLY
The following tables present condensed parent company only financial information:
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 61 | $ | 567 | ||||
Investment in statutory trust | 393 | 384 | ||||||
Investment in subsidiary (equity method) | 104,827 | 112,330 | ||||||
Other assets | 1,867 | 236 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 107,148 | $ | 113,517 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity: | ||||||||
Subordinated debentures | $ | 5,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 10,310 | 10,310 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable | 35 | 52 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 2,612 | 2,784 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 17,957 | 23,146 | ||||||
Shareholders’ equity | 89,191 | 90,371 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 107,148 | $ | 113,517 | ||||
December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 11,296 | $ | 10,343 | ||||
Investment in statutory trust | 425 | 418 | ||||||
Investment in subsidiary (equity method) | 151,700 | 131,194 | ||||||
| Equity securities, at fair value | 2,093 | 0 | ||||||
Other assets | 726 | 2,019 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 166,240 | $ | 143,974 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity: | ||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures | $ | 10,310 | $ | 10,310 | ||||
Accrued interest payable | 9 | 16 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 61 | 41 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 10,380 | 10,367 | ||||||
Shareholders’ equity | 155,860 | 133,607 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 166,240 | $ | 143,974 | ||||
Condensed Statements of Income
For the Year Ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Income: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiaries | $ | 8,698 | $ | 16,000 | $ | 12,500 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||||||||
Income from trust | 9 | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income | 75 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on equity securities | 1,158 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trust income | 8 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total income | 8,707 | 16,007 | 12,506 | 11,241 | 10,090 | |||||||||||||||
Expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest on subordinated notes | 380 | 625 | 1,450 | 0 | 24 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on junior subordinated debt | 300 | 247 | 206 | 251 | 430 | |||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 162 | 182 | 168 | 312 | 275 | |||||||||||||||
Other losses | 113 | 115 | 114 | |||||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 955 | 1,169 | 1,938 | 563 | 729 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 7,752 | 14,838 | 10,568 | 10,679 | 9,361 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | - | - | - | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary | 7,752 | 14,838 | 10,568 | 10,673 | 9,361 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary | (7,605 | ) | (8,529 | ) | 25,272 | 4,675 | 1,714 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 147 | $ | 6,309 | $ | 35,840 | $ | 15,347 | $ | 11,075 | ||||||||||
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 147 | $ | 6,309 | $ | 35,840 | $ | 15,347 | $ | 11,075 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed loss (income) of subsidiary | 7,605 | 8,529 | (25,272 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary | (4,675 | ) | (1,714 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in trust | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | (6 | ) | (8 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable | (17 | ) | (10,850 | ) | 999 | |||||||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets | 328 | 639 | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities | (172 | ) | 59 | (58 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Gain on equity securities | (1,158 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Decrease in accrued interest payable | (7 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Decrease in other assets | 621 | 467 | ||||||||||||||||||
Increase in other liabilities | 20 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 7,882 | 4,679 | 11,485 | 10,140 | 9,805 | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of privately-held bank holding company stock | (1,658 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities | (1,658 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Investment in Subsidiary | (5,000 | ) | (17,750 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale/transfer of equity securities | 1,223 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of equity securities | (500 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of equity security without a readily determinable fair value | (500 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (4,777 | ) | (17,750 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Principal reduction on subordinated debentures | (5,000 | ) | (4,000 | ) | (11,000 | ) | 0 | (5,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares | 446 | 433 | - | 37 | 21,342 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid | (2,176 | ) | (1,492 | ) | - | (4,447 | ) | (4,030 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (6,730 | ) | (5,059 | ) | (11,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(Decrease) increase in cash | (506 | ) | (380 | ) | 485 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (4,410 | ) | 12,312 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net increase in cash | 953 | 4,367 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash at beginning of year | 567 | 947 | 462 | 10,343 | 5,976 | |||||||||||||||
Cash at end of year | $ | 61 | $ | 567 | $ | 947 | $ | 11,296 | $ | 10,343 | ||||||||||
Note 19.20. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
2020 | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 11,144 | $ | 11,190 | $ | 11,302 | $ | 12,702 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 1,967 | 1,610 | 1,456 | 1,127 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 9,177 | 9,580 | 9,846 | 11,575 | ||||||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 1,151 | 831 | 74 | (115 | ) | |||||||||||
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 8,026 | 8,749 | 9,772 | 11,690 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 1,694 | 2,501 | 2,970 | 2,085 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 7,205 | 6,424 | 7,843 | 7,443 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 2,515 | 4,826 | 4,899 | 6,332 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 452 | 805 | 792 | 1,176 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,063 | $ | 4,021 | $ | 4,107 | $ | 5,156 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
2019 | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 11,609 | $ | 11,462 | $ | 11,506 | $ | 11,479 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 2,663 | 2,508 | 2,455 | 2,170 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 8,946 | 8,954 | 9,051 | 9,309 | ||||||||||||
(Credit) provision for loan and lease losses | (154 | ) | 347 | 637 | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Net interest income after (credit) provision for loan and lease losses | 9,100 | 8,607 | 8,414 | 9,342 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 1,515 | 1,578 | 1,831 | 2,696 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 7,425 | 7,122 | 7,329 | 7,806 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 3,190 | 3,063 | 2,916 | 4,232 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 555 | 514 | 513 | 744 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,635 | $ | 2,549 | $ | 2,403 | $ | 3,488 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||
2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 8,939 | $ | 9,183 | $ | 9,605 | $ | 10,121 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 1,056 | 1,143 | 1,280 | 1,321 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 7,883 | 8,040 | 8,325 | 8,800 | ||||||||||||
(Credit) provision for loan and lease losses | (478 | ) | 421 | 543 | 283 | |||||||||||
Net interest income after (credit) provision for loan and lease losses | 8,361 | 7,619 | 7,782 | 8,517 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 1,570 | 2,023 | 1,714 | 1,918 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 6,928 | 6,940 | 6,397 | 7,804 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 3,003 | 2,702 | 3,099 | 2,631 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 806 | 910 | 827 | 8,745 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 2,197 | $ | 1,792 | $ | 2,272 | $ | (6,114 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.36 | ) | |||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.36 | ) | |||||||
2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 8,544 | $ | 8,663 | $ | 8,765 | $ | 8,776 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 1,006 | 1,050 | 1,085 | 1,056 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 7,538 | 7,613 | 7,680 | 7,720 | ||||||||||||
Provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 696 | 396 | (234 | ) | 295 | |||||||||||
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan and lease losses | 6,842 | 7,217 | 7,914 | 7,425 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 1,331 | 2,094 | 1,380 | 1,398 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense | 6,804 | 7,025 | 6,553 | 7,163 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 1,369 | 2,286 | 2,741 | 1,660 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 226 | 661 | 724 | 136 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,143 | $ | 1,625 | $ | 2,017 | $ | 1,524 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
FNCB’s management, haswith the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of FNCB’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Based on that evaluation, FNCB’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded FNCB’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.2020.
There were no changes made to FNCB’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, FNCB’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for FNCB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of the Company’s financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are only being made in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Any control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of a control system inherently has limitations and the benefits of controls must be weighed against their costs. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. Therefore, no assessment of a cost-effective system of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, will be detected.
As of December 31, 20172020, management of the Company conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included extensive documenting, evaluating and testing the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Based on this evaluation under the criteria in the Framework, management concluded that the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2020.
Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements, has issued an audit report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. That report is included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| /s/ Gerard A. Champi | /s/ James M. Bone, Jr., CPA |
Gerard A. Champi President and Chief Executive Officer | James M. Bone, Jr., CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Other Information |
None
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. |
The information concerning the Directors and Executive Officers of FNCB required by this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Information as to Nominees, Directors and Executive Officers” in FNCB’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20182020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about April 17, 201813, 2020 (the “Proxy Statement”). Disclosure of compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by FNCB’s Directors and Executive Officers is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Section“Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Reports” in the Proxy Statement. In addition, information concerning Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert is included in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Audit Committee Report” and is incorporated herein by reference.
FNCB has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) that applies to FNCB’s directors and employees, including the President and Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”), Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”) and Principal Accounting Officer (“PAO”). The Code includes guidelines relating to compliance with laws, the ethical handling of actual or potential conflicts of interest, the use of corporate opportunities, protection and use of FNCB’s confidential information, accepting gifts and business courtesies, accurate financial and regulatory reporting, and procedures for promoting compliance with, and reporting violations of, the Code. The Code is available on FNCB’s website at www.fncb.com/investorrelations/ under the heading “Governance Documents.” FNCB intends to post any amendments to the Code on its website and also to disclose any waivers (to the extent applicable to FNCB’s President, PEO, PFO or PAO) on a Form 8-K within the prescribed time period.
Executive Compensation. |
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Executive Compensation” in FNCB’s Proxy Statement.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
The information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Principal Beneficial Owners of FNCB’s Common Stock” in FNCB’s Proxy Statement.
The information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the section entitled "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in FNCB's Proxy Statement.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. |
The information required by this Item 13 related to certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in FNCB’s Proxy Statement. The information required under this Item 13 related to Director Independence is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Corporate Governance” in FNCB’s Proxy Statement.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services. |
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in FNCB’s Proxy Statement.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
1. | Financial Statements |
The following financial statements are included by reference in Part II, Item 8 hereof:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition | |
Consolidated Statements of Income | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |
| |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
2. | Financial Statement Schedules |
Financial Statement Schedules are omitted because the required information is either not applicable, not required or is shown in the respective financial statements or in the notes thereto.
3. | The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference. |
EXHIBIT 3.1 | |
EXHIBIT 3.2 | |
EXHIBIT | |
EXHIBIT 4.1 | |
EXHIBIT 4.2 | |
| EXHIBIT 4.3 | Indenture by and between First National Community Bancorp, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, dated as of December 14, 2006 - filed as Exhibit 10.2 to FNCB's Current Report on Form 8-K on December 19, 2006, DEC file number 333-24121, is hereby incorporated by reference. |
| EXHIBIT 4.4* | Description of Securities |
EXHIBIT 10.1 | |
EXHIBIT 10.2 | |
EXHIBIT | |
| |
| |
|
EXHIBIT | |
EXHIBIT | |
EXHIBIT | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
EXHIBIT | |
EXHIBIT | |
EXHIBIT | |
EXHIBIT | |
EXHIBIT | |
EXHIBIT 21 | |
EXHIBIT 23* | |
EXHIBIT 31.1* | |
EXHIBIT 31.2* | |
EXHIBIT 32** | Section 1350 Certification — Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT |
|
| EXHIBIT 101.SCH | INLINE XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA |
| EXHIBIT 101.CAL | INLINE XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE |
| EXHIBIT 101.DEF | INLINE XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE |
| EXHIBIT 101.LAB | INLINE XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABLE LINKBASE |
| EXHIBIT 101.PRE | INLINE XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE |
| EXHIBIT 104 | COVER PAGE INTERATIVE DATA FILE (FORMATTED AS INLINE XBRL AND CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT 101) |
_____________________________
* Filed herewith
** Furnished herewith
+ Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement
None.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized:
Registrant: FNCB BANCORP, INC.
/s/ Gerard A. Champi | March | ||
Gerard A. Champi | Date | ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Gerard A. Champi and James M. Bone, Jr., jointly and severally, his or her attorney-in-fact, each with the full power of substitutes, for such person, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might do or could do in person hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
/s/ Gerard A. Champi | March 12, 2021 | ||
Gerard A. Champi | Date | ||
/s/ James M. Bone, Jr. | March 12, 2021 | ||
James M. Bone, Jr., CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial Officer | Date | ||
/s/ Stephanie A. Westington | March 12, 2021 | ||
Stephanie A. Westington, CPA Senior Vice President and Controller Principal Accounting Officer | Date | ||
Directors:
/s/ William G. Bracey | March | /s/ Gerard A. Champi | March | |||||||
William G, Bracey | Date | Gerard A. Champi | Date | |||||||
/s/ Joseph Coccia | March | /s/ | March | |||||||
Joseph Coccia | Date |
| Date | |||||||
/s/ | March | /s/ Louis A. DeNaples, Jr. | March | |||||||
| Date | Louis A. DeNaples, Jr. | Date | |||||||
/s/ | March | /s/ | March | |||||||
| Date |
| Date | |||||||
| ||||||||||
/s/ |
|
| March | /s/ Thomas J. Melone | March 12, 2021 | |||||
| Date |
| Date | |||||||
/s/ |
|
| March | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
John P. Moses | Date |
115