H.B. Fuller Company was founded in 1887 and incorporated as a Minnesota corporation in 1915. Our stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol FUL. As used herein, “H.B. Fuller”, “we”, “us”, “our”, “management” or “company” includes H.B. Fuller and its subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated. Where we refer to ~~2018, 2017~~2020, 2019 and ~~2016~~2018 herein, the reference is to our fiscal years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018, ~~December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016,~~ respectively.

We are a leading worldwide formulator, manufacturer and marketer of adhesives, sealants and other specialty chemical products. Sales operations span 3435 countries in North America, Europe, Latin America, the Asia Pacific region, India, the Middle East and Africa. Industrial adhesives represent our core product offering. Customers use our adhesives products in manufacturing common consumer and industrial goods, including food and beverage containers, disposable diapers, windows, doors, flooring, roofing, appliances, sportswear, footwear, multi-wall bags, water filtration products, insulation, textiles, automobiles, recreational vehicles, buses, trucks and trailers, marine products, solar energy systems, electronics and products for the aerospace and defense industries. Our adhesives help improve the performance of our customers’ products or improve their manufacturing processes. We also provide our customers with technical support and unique solutions designed to address their specific needs. In addition, we have established a variety of product offerings for residential construction markets, such as tile-setting adhesives, grouts, sealants and related products.

OnAs of November ~~1, 2017,~~30, 2019, we acquired Adecol Industria Quimica, Limitada (“Adecol”), headquartered in Guarulhos, Brazil. Adecol works with customers to develop innovative, high-quality hot melt, reactive and polymer-based adhesive solutions in the packaging, converting and durable assembly markets. The purchase price of $40.3 million was funded through borrowings on our revolving credit facility and existing cash and is reported in ourhad five reportable segments: Americas Adhesives, ~~operating segment.~~

~~On October 20, 2017, we acquired Royal~~EIMEA (Europe, India, Middle East and Africa), Asia Pacific, Construction Adhesives and Sealants (“Royal Adhesives”), a manufacturer of high-value specialty adhesives and sealants. Royal Adhesives is a supplier of industrial adhesives in a diverse set of end markets, including aerospace, transportation, commercial roofing, insulating glass, solar, packaging and flooring applications and operates 19 manufacturing facilities in five countries. The purchase price of $1,620.3 million was funded through new debt financing. Royal Adhesives is included in multiple operating segments.

~~On January 27, 2017, we acquired substantially all~~Engineering Adhesives. As of the ~~assets~~beginning of ~~H.E. Wisdom & Sons, Inc.~~fiscal 2020, we realigned our operating segment structure and ~~its affiliate Wisdom~~now have three reportable segments: Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives, ~~Southeast, L.L.C., (“Wisdom Adhesives”~~Engineering Adhesives and Construction Adhesives. The change in operating segments is based on how we have organized the company to make operating decisions and assess business performance. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (the “MD&A”) ~~headquartered~~ in ~~Elgin, Illinois. Wisdom Adhesives is~~Item 7 of this Annual Report for a ~~provider~~description of ~~adhesives for the packaging, paper converting and durable assembly markets. The purchase price of $123.5 million was financed through borrowings on~~ our ~~revolving credit facility and is reported in our Americas Adhesives~~segment operating ~~segment.~~results.

The principal markets, products and methods of distribution outside the United States vary with each of our regional operations generally maintaining integrated business units that contain dedicated supplier networks, manufacturing, logistics and sales organizations. The vast majority of the products sold within any region are produced within the region, and the respective regions do not import significant amounts of product from other regions. As of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, we had sales offices and manufacturing plants in 21 countries outside the United States and satellite sales offices in another 1213 countries.

We have ~~detailed~~a Code of Business Conduct ~~policies~~and detailed Core Policies that we apply across all of our operations around the world. These policies represent a set of common values that apply to all employees and all of our business dealings. We have adopted policies and processes, and conduct employee training, ~~all of which are~~ intended to ensure compliance with various economic sanctions and export controls, including the regulations of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). We do not conduct any business in the following countries that are subject to U.S. economic sanctions: Cuba; Iran; North Korea; Syria and the Crimea region of the Ukraine. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings for additional disclosures regarding past business conducted in Iran.

Many of our markets are highly competitive. However, we compete effectively due to the quality and breadth of our adhesives, sealants and specialty chemical portfolio and the experience and expertise of our commercial organizations. Within the adhesives and other specialty chemical markets, we believe few suppliers have comparable global reach and corresponding ability to deliver quality and consistency to multinational customers. Our competition is made up generally of two types of companies: (1) similar multinational suppliers and (2) regional or specialty suppliers that typically compete in only one region or within a narrow geographic area within a region. The multinational competitors typically maintain a broad product offering and range of technology, while regional or specialty companies tend to have limited or more focused product ranges and technology.

Principal competitive factors in the sale of adhesives and other specialty chemicals are product performance, supply assurance, technical service, quality, price and customer service.

We have cultivated strong, integrated relationships with a diverse set of customers worldwide. Our customers are among the technology and market leaders in consumer goods, construction, and industrial markets. We pride ourselves on long-term, collaborative customer relationships and a diverse portfolio of customers in which no single customer accounted for more than 10 percent of consolidated net revenue.

Our leading customers include manufacturers of food and beverages, hygiene products, clothing, major appliances, electronics, automobiles, aerospace and defense products, solar energy systems, filters, construction materials, wood flooring, furniture, cabinetry, windows, doors, tissue and towel, corrugation, tube winding, packaging, labels and tapes.

Our products are delivered directly to customers primarily from our manufacturing ~~plants,~~and distribution facilities, with additional deliveries made through distributors and retailers.

As of ~~unfilled orders existed at December 1, 2018 or December 2, 2017.~~November 28, 2020, we have approximately 6,428 employees in 45 countries, including approximately 2,510 employees based in the U.S. Approximately 448 U.S. employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements with various unions. Approximately 755 employees in foreign countries are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Overall, we consider our employee relations to be good.

We care about our colleagues and anyone who enters our workplace and we believe that nothing we do is worth getting hurt for. We have a strong Environmental, Health and Safety program that focuses on implementing policies and training programs, as well as performing self-audits to enhance work safety. Importantly during 2020, our experience and continuing focus on workplace safety have enabled us to preserve business continuity without sacrificing our commitment to keeping our colleagues and workplace visitors safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our primary compensation strategy is “Pay for Performance”, which supports a culture of accountability and performance. Our compensation guiding principles are to structure compensation that is simple, aligned and balanced. We believe that these principles are strongly aligned with the strategic priorities of our business and our objectives to deliver value for our shareholders.

We are committed to fair pay and strive to be externally competitive while ensuring internal equity across our organization. We conduct global pay equity assessments and compensation reviews, and when necessary, we take action to address areas of concern.

Quality, affordable health care is the foundation of the comprehensive benefits package we offer our employees. It is one of the tools we use to recruit and retain, and it is seen as the preferred benefit by most employees. Employees earning below $50,000 each year have 100% of their individual health care costs covered by the Company in the form of a medical premium reimbursement. Employees with family coverage still must cover the difference between the individual and family rate.

Our purpose is connecting what matters for all stakeholders and we go about this by winning the right way through our core values. We expect employees to act with integrity and hold each other accountable for our actions. We value our global team’s diverse perspectives, backgrounds and experiences. We make daily, conscious choices to excel, by always bringing passion and creativity to our work, and by striving for innovation ethically and fairly. Our worldwide network of culture champions supports our focus on being At Our Best. Our communication on goals, targets and performance is frequent and transparent. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we quickly adopted and implemented principles supporting new and more efficient ways of performing our work to ensure even more and better connections across the company, as well as with customers and external partners. This supports our desire to be first and fastest in finding solutions for customers and improving our overall effectiveness. Finally, we continue to take great pride in our focus on giving back to the communities in which we operate through the giving efforts of the H.B. Fuller Foundation and the thousands of employee volunteer hours each year.

As a global company, we currently have employees present in over 40 countries around the world. We place strong value on collaboration and we believe that working together leads to better outcomes for our customers. This extends to the way we treat each other as team members. We strive to create an environment where innovative ideas can flourish by demonstrating respect for each other and valuing the diverse opinions, background and viewpoints of employees. We believe that diversity in our teams leads to new ideas, helps us solve problems and allows us to better connect with our global customer base.

We are taking specific actions to foster inclusion and diversity into our culture. Learning resources have been implemented to support greater awareness and understanding of the behaviors expected from employees. We will be introducing employee networking groups, an expanded and enhanced mentoring program and focused development programs with the goal of creating meaningful opportunities for employees. We will also adjust our recruiting practices to ensure we are getting the right level of exposure to diverse candidates.

We recognize how important it is for our colleagues to develop and progress in their careers. We provide a variety of resources to help our colleagues grow in their current roles and build new skills, including online development resources focused on specific business imperatives with access to hundreds of online courses in our Learning Management system. We are implementing an innovative delivery method for leadership training to drive experiential learning and to increase access to leaders around the world. Individual development planning is a part of our annual goal setting process and people managers are expected to have regular discussions with employees to measure progress and make needed adjustments. We focus on getting employees into roles with greater responsibility and opportunities for advancement that are also aligned with their career path to facilitate development and maximize potential. Finally, we provide ambitious employees with short-term opportunities in unique assignments in addition to their current roles. These assignments support the employees’ development while also supporting company initiatives that are required to be resourced with talented employees.

We use several principal raw materials in our manufacturing processes, including tackifying resins, polymers, synthetic rubbers, vinyl acetate monomer and plasticizers. We generally avoid sole source supplier arrangements for raw materials.

The majority of our raw materials are petroleum/natural gas based derivatives. Under normal conditions, raw materials are available on the open market. Prices and availability are subject to supply and demand market mechanisms. Raw material costs are primarily determined by the balance of supply against the aggregate demand from the adhesives industry and other industries that use the same raw material streams. The cost of crude oil and natural gas, the primary feedstocks for our raw materials, can also impact the cost of our raw materials.

Much of the technology we use in our products and manufacturing processes is available in the public domain. For technology not available in the public domain, we rely on trade secrets and patents when appropriate to protect our competitive position. We also license some patented technology from other sources. Our business is not materially dependent upon licenses or similar rights or on any single patent or group of related patents.

We enter into agreements with many employees to protect rights to technology and intellectual property. Confidentiality commitments also are routinely obtained from customers, suppliers and others to safeguard proprietary information.

We own numerous trademarks and service marks in various countries. Trademarks, such as H.B. Fuller®, Swift®, Advantra®, Clarity®, Sesame®, TEC®, Foster®, Rakoll®, Rapidex®, ~~Full-CareTM,~~Full-Care®, Thermonex®, Silaprene®, Eternabond®, Cilbond®, and TONSAN® are important in marketing products. Many of our trademarks and service marks are registered. U.S. trademark registrations are for a term of ten years and are renewable every ten years as long as the trademarks are used in the regular course of trade.

Our investment in research and development creates new and innovative adhesive technology platforms, enhances product performance, ensures a competitive cost structure and leverages available raw materials. New product development is a key research and development outcome, providing higher-value solutions to existing customers or meeting new customers’ needs. Projects are developed in local laboratories in each region, where we understand our customer base the best. Platform developments are coordinated globally through our network of laboratories.

Through designing and developing new polymers and new formulations, we expect to continue to grow in our current markets. We also develop new applications for existing products and technologies, and improve manufacturing processes to enhance productivity and product quality. Research and development efforts are closely aligned to customer ~~needs, but we do not engage in customer sponsored activities.~~needs. We foster open innovation, seek supplier-driven new technology and use relationships with academic and other institutions to enhance our capabilities.

We comply with applicable federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and workers' ~~safety.~~safety, including those required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) and the EU’s Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (“REACH”) regulation. This includes regular review of and upgrades to environmental, health and safety policies, practices and procedures as well as improved production methods to minimize our facilities’ outgoing waste, based on evolving societal standards and increased environmental understanding.

Expenditures to comply with environmental regulations over the next two years are estimated to be approximately ~~$13.8~~$10.1 million, including approximately ~~$1.4~~$1.6 million of capital expenditures. See additional disclosure under Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) prohibits bribery of government officials to benefit business interests. We operate and sell our products in countries that are rated as high-risk for corruption, which creates the risk of unauthorized conduct by our employees, customs brokers, distributors or other third party intermediaries that could be in violation of the FCPA or similar local regulations. We comply with the FCPA’s requirements to make and keep accurate books and records that accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls.

We are also subject to and comply with increasingly complex privacy and data protection laws and regulations in the United States and other jurisdictions. This includes the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which enforces rules relating to the protection of processing and movement of personal data. The interpretation and enforcement of such regulations are continuously evolving and there may be uncertainty with respect to how to comply with them. Noncompliance with GDPR and other data protection laws could result in damage to our reputation and payment of monetary penalties.

Our operating segments have historically had lower net revenue in winter months, which is primarily our first fiscal quarter, mainly due to international holidays and the seasonal decline in construction and consumer spending activities.

~~We employed approximately 6,500 individuals on December 1, 2018, of which approximately 2,700 were located in the United States.~~

The following table shows the name, age and business experience for the past five years of the executive officers as of January ~~7, 2019.~~6, 2021. Unless otherwise noted, the positions described are positions with the company or its subsidiaries.

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) via EDGAR. Our SEC filings are available free of charge to the public at our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with or furnished to the SEC.

As a global manufacturer of adhesives, sealants and other specialty chemical products, we operate in a business environment that is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Below are the most significant factors that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

~~Uncertainties in foreign~~ ~~economic,~~~~political, regulatory and~~ ~~social conditions~~ ~~and fluctuations in foreign currency may adversely affect~~ ~~our results.~~

Approximately 55 percent, or $1.7 billion, of our net revenue was generated outside the United States in 2018. International operations could be adversely affected by changes in economic, political, regulatory, and social conditions, especially in Brazil, Russia, China, the Middle East, including Turkey and Egypt, and other developing or emerging markets where we do business. An economic downturn in the businesses or geographic areas in which we sell our products could reduce demand for these products and result in a decrease in sales volume that could have a negative impact on our results of operations. Product demand often depends on end-use markets. Economic conditions that reduce consumer confidence or discretionary spending may reduce product demand. Challenging economic conditions may also impair the ability of our customers to pay for products they have purchased, and as a result, our reserves for doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable may increase. In addition, trade protection measures, anti-bribery and anti-corruption regulations, restrictions on repatriation of earnings, differing intellectual property rights and changes in legal and regulatory requirements that restrict the sales of products or increase costs could adversely affect our results of operations.

Fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could potentially result in increases or decreases in net revenue, cost of raw materials and earnings and may adversely affect the value of our assets outside the United States. In 2018, the change in foreign currencies negatively impacted our net revenue by approximately $2.0 million. In 2018, we spent approximately $1.7 billion for raw materials worldwide of which approximately $869.1 million was purchased outside the United States. Based on 2018 financial results, a hypothetical one percent change in our cost of sales due to foreign currency rate changes would have resulted in a change in net income of approximately $8.3 million or $0.16 per diluted share. Although we utilize risk management tools, including hedging, as appropriate, to mitigate market fluctuations in foreign currencies, any changes in strategy in regard to risk management tools can also affect revenue, expenses and results of operations and there can be no assurance that such measures will result in cost savings or that all market fluctuation exposure will be eliminated.

~~Distressed financial markets may result in dramatic deflation of financial asset valuations and a general disruption in capital markets.~~

Adverse equity market conditions and volatility in the credit markets could have a negative impact on the value of our pension trust assets, our future estimated pension liabilities and other postretirement benefit plans. In addition, we could be required to provide increased pension plan funding. As a result, our financial results could be negatively impacted. Reduced access to capital markets may affect our ability to invest in strategic growth initiatives such as acquisitions. In addition, the reduced credit availability could limit our customers’ ability to invest in their businesses, refinance maturing debt obligations, or meet their ongoing working capital needs. If these customers do not have sufficient access to the financial markets, demand for our products may decline.

~~The interest rates of our term loans are priced using a spread over LIBOR.~~

LIBOR, the London interbank offered rate, is the basic rate of interest used in lending between banks on the London interbank market and is widely used as a reference for setting the interest rate on loans globally. We typically use LIBOR as a reference rate in our term loans such that the interest due to our creditors pursuant to a term loan extended to us is calculated using LIBOR. Most of our term loan agreements contain a stated minimum value for LIBOR.

On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. It is unclear if at that time whether or not LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, is considering replacing U.S. dollar LIBOR with a new index calculated by short-term repurchase agreements, backed by Treasury securities (“SOFR”). SOFR is observed and backward looking, which stands in contrast with LIBOR under the current methodology, which is an estimated forward-looking rate and relies, to some degree, on the expert judgment of submitting panel members. Given that SOFR is a secured rate backed by government securities, it will be a rate that does not take into account bank credit risk (as is the case with LIBOR). SOFR is therefore likely to be lower than LIBOR and is less likely to correlate with the funding costs of financial institutions. Whether or not SOFR attains market traction as a LIBOR replacement tool remains in question. As such, the future of LIBOR at this time is uncertain. If LIBOR ceases to exist, we may need to renegotiate our credit agreements with that utilize LIBOR as a factor in determining the interest rate to replace LIBOR with the new standard that is established.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected and will continue to affect our operations and financial results.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, which became a global pandemic. Throughout fiscal year 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant disruptive impact on global economies, supply chains and industrial production, which resulted in reduced demand in some markets, while at the same time driving elevated demand for adhesive solutions for paper products, food and e-commerce packaging, and hygiene and medical goods. We effectively managed our global operations throughout the pandemic, implementing rigorous protocols focused on the health and safety of our employees and ensuring business continuity across our supplier, manufacturing and distribution networks. These actions enabled us to meet our customers’ increased demands for adhesive solutions for essential goods, effectively allocate our resources and manage expenses, and deliver strong financial results, while maintaining a safe workplace for employees. However, due to the evolving and highly uncertain nature of this event, it is currently not possible to estimate any additional direct or indirect impacts this outbreak may have on our business. Any disruption of the manufacturing of our products, commerce and related activity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Increases in prices and declines in the availability of raw materials could negatively impact our financial results.

In ~~2018,~~2020, raw material costs made up approximately 75 percent of our cost of sales. Accordingly, changes in the cost of raw materials can significantly impact our earnings. Raw materials needed to manufacture products are obtained from a number of suppliers and many of the raw materials are petroleum and natural gas based derivatives. Under normal market conditions, these raw materials are generally available on the open market from a variety of producers. While alternate supplies of most key raw materials are available, supplier production outages may lead to strained supply-demand situations for certain raw materials. The substitution of key raw materials requires us to identify new supply sources, reformulate and re-test and may require seeking re-approval from our customers using those products. From time to time, the prices and availability of these raw materials may fluctuate, which could impair our ability to procure necessary materials, or increase the cost of manufacturing products. If the prices of raw materials increase in a short period of time, we may be unable to pass these increases on to our customers in a timely manner and could experience reductions to our profit margins. Based on ~~2018~~2020 financial results, a hypothetical one percent change in our raw material costs would have resulted in a change in net income of approximately ~~$12.1~~$11.0 million or ~~$0.23~~$0.21 per diluted share.

We experience substantial competition in each of the operating segments and geographic areas in which we operate.

Our wide variety of products are sold in numerous markets, each of which is highly competitive. Our competitive position in markets is, in part, subject to external factors. For example, supply and demand for certain of our products is driven by end-use markets and worldwide capacities which, in turn, impact demand for and pricing of our products. Many of our direct competitors are part of large multinational companies and may have more resources than we do. Any increase in competition may result in lost market share or reduced prices, which could result in reduced profit margins. This may impair the ability to grow or even to maintain current levels of revenues and earnings. While we have an extensive customer base, loss of certain top customers could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations until such business is replaced, and no assurances can be made that we would be able to regain or replace any lost customers.

Failure to develop new products and protect our intellectual property could negatively impact our future performance and growth.

Ongoing innovation and product development are important factors in our competitiveness. Failure to create new products and generate new ideas could negatively impact our ability to grow and deliver strong financial results. We continually apply for and obtain U.S. and foreign patents to protect the results of our research for use in our operations and licensing. We are party to a number of patent licenses and other technology agreements. We rely on patents, confidentiality agreements and internal security measures to protect our intellectual property. Failure to protect this intellectual property could negatively affect our future performance and growth.

~~We may be required to record impairment charges on our goodwill or long-lived assets.~~

Weak demand may cause underutilization of our manufacturing capacity or elimination of product lines; contract terminations or customer shutdowns may force sale or abandonment of facilities and equipment; or other events associated with weak economic conditions or specific product or customer events may require us to record an impairment on tangible assets, such as facilities and equipment, as well as intangible assets, such as intellectual property or goodwill, which would have a negative impact on our financial results.

~~Catastrophic events could disrupt our operations or the operations of our suppliers or customers, having a negative impact on our financial results.~~

Unexpected events, including natural disasters and severe weather events, fires or explosions at our facilities or those of our suppliers, acts of war or terrorism, supply disruptions or breaches of security of our information technology systems could increase the cost of doing business or otherwise harm our operations, our customers and our suppliers. Such events could reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible for us to receive raw materials from suppliers and deliver products to our customers.

A failure in our information technology systems could negatively impact our business.

We rely on information technology to record and process transactions, manage our business and maintain the financial accuracy of our records. Our computer systems are subject to damage or interruption from various sources, including power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches, vandalism, catastrophic events and human error. Interruptions of our computer systems could disrupt our business, for example by leading to plant downtime and/or power outages, and could result in the loss of business and cause us to incur additional expense.

Information technology security threats are increasing in frequency and sophistication. Our information technology systems could be breached by unauthorized outside parties or misused by employees or other insiders intent on extracting sensitive information, corrupting information or disrupting business processes. Such unauthorized access and a failure to effectively recover from breaches could compromise confidential information, disrupt our business, harm our reputation, result in the loss of assets including trade secrets and other intellectual property, customer confidence and business, result in regulatory proceedings and legal claims, and have a negative impact on our financial results.

We are in the process of implementing a global Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system that we refer to as Project ONE, which will upgrade and standardize our information system. ~~The~~Implementation of Project ONE began in our North America adhesives business ~~went live~~ in ~~2014. In 2017,~~2014 and, through 2020, we ~~began the~~completed implementation ~~and upgrade~~of this system in various parts of our ~~ERP system in our~~business including Latin America ~~adhesives business~~(except Brazil), Australia and ~~implementation for all countries, with the exception of Brazil, has been completed as of the end of 2018.~~various other businesses in North America. During ~~2019~~2021 and beyond, we will continue implementation in North America, EIMEA ~~(Europe, India, Middle East and Africa)~~ and Asia Pacific.

Any delays or other failure to achieve our implementation goals may adversely impact our financial results. In addition, the failure to either deliver the application on time or anticipate the necessary readiness and training needs could lead to business disruption and loss of business. Failure or abandonment of any part of the ERP system could result in a write-off of part or all of the costs that have been capitalized on the project.

Risks associated with acquisitions could have an adverse effect on us and the inability to execute organizational restructuring may affect our results.

As part of our growth strategy, from time to time, we have made ~~and intend to pursue additional~~ acquisitions of complementary businesses or ~~products and joint ventures.~~products. The ability to grow through acquisitions ~~or joint ventures~~ depends upon our ability to identify, negotiate, complete and integrate suitable ~~acquisitions or joint venture arrangements.~~acquisitions. If we fail to successfully integrate acquisitions into our existing business, our results of operations and our cash flows could be adversely affected. Our acquisition strategy also involves other risks and uncertainties, including distraction of management from current operations, greater than expected liabilities and expenses, inadequate return on capital, unidentified issues not discovered in our investigations and evaluations of those strategies and acquisitions, and difficulties implementing and maintaining consistent standards, controls, procedures, policies and systems. Future acquisitions could result in additional debt ~~dilution,~~and other liabilities, and increased interest expense, restructuring charges and amortization ~~expenses~~expense related to intangible assets.

In addition, our profitability is dependent on our ability to drive sustainable productivity improvements such as cost savings through organizational restructuring. Delays or unexpected costs may prevent us from realizing the full operational and financial benefits of such restructuring initiatives and may potentially disrupt our operations.

We may not realize the revenue growth opportunities and cost synergies that are anticipated from the Royal Adhesives acquisition as we may experience difficulties in integrating Royal Adhesives’ business with ours.

The benefits that are expected to result from the Royal Adhesives acquisition will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated revenue growth opportunities and cost synergies as a result of the acquisition. Our success in realizing these revenue growth opportunities and cost synergies, and the timing of this realization, depends on the successful integration of Royal Adhesives. There is a significant degree of difficulty and management distraction inherent in the process of integrating an acquisition as sizable as Royal Adhesives. The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, our Royal Adhesives’ activities. Members of our senior management may be required to devote considerable amounts of time to this integration process, which will decrease the time they will have to manage our company, service existing customers, attract new customers and develop new products or strategies. If senior management is not able to effectively manage the integration process, or if any significant business activities are interrupted as a result of the integration process, our business could suffer. There can be no assurance that we will successfully or cost-effectively integrate Royal Adhesives. The failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Even if we are able to integrate Royal Adhesives successfully, this integration may not result in the realization of the full benefits of the growth opportunities and cost synergies that we currently expect from this integration, and we cannot guarantee that these benefits will be achieved within anticipated timeframes or at all. For example, we may not be able to eliminate duplicative costs. Moreover, we may incur substantial expenses in connection with the integration of Royal Adhesives. While it is anticipated that certain expenses will be incurred to achieve cost synergies, such expenses are difficult to estimate accurately, and may exceed current estimates. Accordingly, the benefits from the acquisition may be offset by costs incurred to, or delays in, integrating the businesses.

~~The debt incurred in connection with the Royal Adhesives acquisition could have a negative impact on our liquidity or restrict our activities.~~

As a result of the Royal Adhesives acquisition, our outstanding indebtedness has significantly increased. Our current indebtedness contains various covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions. Our overall leverage and the terms of our financing arrangements could:

In addition, the restrictive covenants require us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet those financial ratios and tests will depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance, which, in turn, will be subject to economic conditions and to financial, market and competitive factors, many of which are beyond our control. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the instruments governing our indebtedness.

The impact of changing laws or regulations or the manner of interpretation or enforcement of existing laws or regulations could adversely impact our financial performance and restrict our ability to operate our business or execute our strategies.

New laws or regulations, or changes in existing laws or regulations or the manner of their interpretation or enforcement, could increase our cost of doing business and restrict our ability to operate our business or execute our strategies. In addition, compliance with laws and regulations is complicated by our substantial global footprint, which will require significant and additional resources to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations in the various countries where we conduct business.

Our global operations expose us to trade and economic sanctions and other restrictions imposed by the U.S., the EU and other governments and organizations. The U.S. Departments of Justice, Commerce, State and Treasury and other federal agencies and authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of economic sanctions laws, export control laws, the ~~Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”)~~FCPA and other federal statutes and regulations, including those established by the ~~Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”).~~OFAC. Under these laws and regulations, as well as other anti-corruption laws, anti-money-laundering laws, export control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws and other laws governing our operations, various government agencies may require export licenses, may seek to impose modifications to business practices, including cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries or with sanctioned persons or entities and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs, and may subject us to fines, penalties and other sanctions. A violation of these laws, regulations, policies or procedures could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Although we have implemented policies and procedures in these areas, we cannot assure ~~you~~ that our policies and procedures are sufficient or that directors, officers, employees, representatives, manufacturers, suppliers and agents have not engaged and will not engage in conduct in violation of such policies and procedures.

Our operations from time to time are parties to or targets of lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including product liability, personal injury, asbestos, patent and intellectual property, commercial, contract, environmental, antitrust, health and safety, and employment matters, which are handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. The results of any future litigation or settlement of such lawsuits and claims are inherently unpredictable, but such outcomes could be adverse and material in amount. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings for a discussion of current litigation.

Costs and expenses resulting from compliance with environmental laws and regulations may negatively impact our operations and financial results.

We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations that impose various environmental controls on us or otherwise relate to environmental protection, the sale and export of certain chemicals or hazardous materials, and various health and safety matters. The costs of complying with these laws and regulations can be significant and may increase as applicable requirements and their enforcement become more stringent and new rules are implemented. Adverse developments and/or periodic settlements could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings for a discussion of current environmental matters.

The Company’s effective tax rate could be volatile and materially change as a result of the adoption of new tax legislation and other factors.

A change in tax laws is one of many factors that impact the Company’s effective tax rate. The U.S. Congress and other government agencies in jurisdictions where the Company does business have had an extended focus on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations. As a result, the tax laws in the U.S. and other countries in which the Company does business could change, and any such changes could adversely impact our effective tax rate, financial condition and results of operations.

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an international association of 34 countries including the United States, has proposed changes to numerous long-standing tax principles. These proposals, if finalized and adopted by the associated countries, will likely increase tax uncertainty and may adversely affect our provision for income taxes.

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law H.R. 1, originally known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”, hereafter referred to as “U.S. Tax Reform”. Since the passing of U.S. Tax Reform, additional guidance in the form of notices and proposed regulations which interpret various aspects of U.S. Tax Reform have been issued. Changes could be made to the proposed regulations as they become finalized, future legislation could be enacted, more regulations and notices could be issued, all of which may impact our financial results. We will continue to monitor all of these changes and will reflect the impact as appropriate in future financial statements. Many state and local tax jurisdictions are still determining how they will interpret elements of U.S. Tax Reform. Final state and local governments’ conformity, legislation and guidance relating to U.S. Tax Reform may impact our financial results.

The results of the U.S. presidential election could lead to changes in tax laws that could negatively impact the Company’s effective tax rate. Prior to the U.S. presidential election, President Biden proposed an increase in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%, doubling the rate of tax on certain earnings of foreign subsidiaries, the creation of a 10% penalty on certain imports and a 15% minimum tax on worldwide book income. If any or all of these (or similar) proposals are ultimately enacted into law, in whole or in part, they could have a negative impact to the Company’s effective tax rate.

Additional income tax expense or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a negative impact on our financial results.

We are subject to income tax laws and regulations in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating and estimating our provision and accruals for these taxes. Our income tax liabilities are dependent upon the location of earnings among these different jurisdictions. Our income tax provision and income tax liabilities could be adversely affected by the jurisdictional mix of earnings, changes in valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in tax laws and regulations. In the ordinary course of our business, we are also subject to continuous examinations of our income tax returns by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final results of any tax examination or related litigation could be materially different from our related historical income tax provisions and accruals. Adverse developments in an audit, examination or litigation related to previously filed tax returns, or in the relevant jurisdiction’s tax laws, regulations, administrative practices, principles and interpretations could have a material effect on our results of operations and cash flows in the period or periods for which that development occurs, as well as for prior and subsequent periods.

~~Federal income tax reform could~~We may be required to record impairment charges on our goodwill or long-lived assets.

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law H.R. 1, originally known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”, hereafter referred to as “U.S. Tax Reform”. Since the passing of U.S. Tax Reform, additional guidance in the form of notices and proposed regulations which interpret various aspects of U.S. Tax Reform have been issued. As of the filing of this document, additional guidance is expected. Changes could be made to the proposed regulations as they become finalized, future legislation could be enacted, more regulations and notices could be issued, all of which may impact our financial results. We will continue to monitor all of these changes and will reflect the impact as appropriate in future financial statements. Many state and local tax jurisdictions are still determining how they will interpret elements of U.S. Tax Reform. Final state and local governments’ conformity, legislation and guidance relating to U.S. Tax Reform may impact our financial results.

Table of Contents

Our current indebtedness could have a negative impact on our liquidity or restrict our activities.

Our current indebtedness contains various covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions. Our overall leverage and the terms of our financing arrangements could:

On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. It is unclear if at that time whether or not LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, is considering replacing U.S. dollar LIBOR with a new index calculated by short-term repurchase agreements, backed by Treasury securities (“SOFR”). SOFR is observed and backward looking, which stands in contrast with LIBOR under the current methodology, which is an estimated forward-looking rate and relies, to some degree, on the expert judgment of submitting panel members. Given that SOFR is a secured rate backed by government securities, it will be a rate that does not take into account bank credit risk (as is the case with LIBOR). SOFR is therefore likely to be lower than LIBOR and is less likely to correlate with the funding costs of financial institutions. Whether or not SOFR attains market traction as a LIBOR replacement tool remains in question. In a November 30, 2020 announcement, LIBOR’s administrator signaled to the market that USD LIBOR for the most liquid maturities is now likely to continue to be published until June 30, 2023, which would allow time for most legacy contracts to mature before USD LIBOR is no longer available, and would also allow for more time for SOFR to develop. If LIBOR ceases to exist prior to the maturity of our contracts, we may need to renegotiate our credit agreements that utilize LIBOR as a factor in determining the interest rate to replace LIBOR with the new standard that is established.

Uncertainties in foreign economic,political, regulatory and social conditions and fluctuations in foreign currency may adversely affect our results.

Approximately 55 percent, or $1.5 billion, of our net revenue was generated outside the United States in 2020. International operations could be adversely affected by changes in economic, political, regulatory, and social conditions, especially in Brazil, Russia, China, the Middle East, including Turkey and Egypt, and other developing or emerging markets where we do business. An economic downturn in the businesses or geographic areas in which we sell our products could reduce demand for these products and result in a decrease in sales volume that could have a negative impact on our results of operations. Product demand often depends on end-use markets. Economic conditions that reduce consumer confidence or discretionary spending may reduce product demand. Challenging economic conditions may also impair the ability of our customers to pay for products they have purchased, and as a result, our reserves for doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable may increase. In addition, trade protection measures, anti-bribery and anti-corruption regulations, restrictions on repatriation of earnings, differing intellectual property rights and changes in legal and regulatory requirements that restrict the sales of products or increase costs could adversely affect our results of operations.

Table of Contents

Fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could potentially result in increases or decreases in net revenue, cost of raw materials and earnings and may adversely affect the value of our assets outside the United States. In 2020, the change in foreign currencies negatively impacted our net revenue by approximately $46.3 million. In 2020, we spent approximately $1.5 billion for raw materials worldwide of which approximately $791.3 million was purchased outside the United States. Based on 2020 financial results, a hypothetical one percent change in our cost of sales due to foreign currency rate changes would have resulted in a change in net income of approximately $7.9 million or $0.15 per diluted share. Although we utilize risk management tools, including hedging, as appropriate, to mitigate market fluctuations in foreign currencies, any changes in strategy in regard to risk management tools can also affect revenue, expenses and results of operations and there can be no assurance that such measures will result in cost savings or that all market fluctuation exposure will be eliminated.

Distressed financial markets may result in dramatic deflation of financial asset valuations and a general disruption in capital markets.

Catastrophic events could disrupt our operations or the operations of our suppliers or customers, having a negative impact on our financial results.

Unexpected events, including global pandemics, natural disasters and severe weather events, fires or explosions at our facilities or those of our suppliers, acts of war or terrorism, supply disruptions or breaches of security of our information technology systems could increase the cost of doing business or otherwise harm our operations, our customers and our suppliers. Such events could reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible for us to receive raw materials from suppliers and deliver products to our customers.

Table of Contents

Principal executive offices and central research facilities are located in the St. Paul, Minnesota area. These facilities are ~~company-owned and contain 247,630 square feet.~~company-owned. Manufacturing operations are carried out at 3834 plants located throughout the United States and at 3637 plants located in 21 other countries. In addition, numerous sales and service offices are located throughout the world. We believe that the properties owned or leased are suitable and adequate for our business. Operating capacity varies by product line, but additional production capacity is available for most product lines by increasing the number of shifts worked. The following is a list of our manufacturing plants as of ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 (each of the listed properties are owned by us, unless otherwise specified):

Table of Contents

From time to time, we become aware of compliance matters relating to, or receive notices from, federal, state or local entities regarding possible or alleged violations of environmental, health or safety laws and regulations. We review the circumstances of each individual site, considering the number of parties involved, the level of potential liability or our contribution relative to the other parties, the nature and magnitude of the hazardous substances involved, the method and extent of remediation, the estimated legal and consulting expense with respect to each site and the time period over which any costs would likely be incurred. Also, from time to time, we are identified as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and/or similar state laws that impose liability for costs relating to the clean up of contamination resulting from past spills, disposal or other release of hazardous substances. We are also subject to similar laws in some of the countries where current and former facilities are located. Our environmental, health and safety department monitors compliance with applicable laws on a global basis. ~~To the extent we can reasonably estimate the amount of our probable liabilities for environmental matters, we establish a financial provision.~~

Currently, we are involved in various environmental investigations, clean up activities and administrative proceedings and lawsuits. In particular, we are currently deemed a PRP in conjunction with numerous other parties, in a number of government enforcement actions associated with landfills and/or hazardous waste sites. As a PRP, we may be required to pay a share of the costs of investigation and clean up of these sites.

We are also engaged in environmental remediation and monitoring efforts at a number of current and former operating facilities. AsTo the extent we can reasonably estimate the amount of ~~December 1, 2018, we accrued $10.7 million, which represents~~ our ~~best estimate of~~ probable liabilities ~~with respect to~~for environmental ~~matters. Of the amount accrued, $4.8 million is attributable to~~matters, we establish a ~~facility we own in Simpsonville, South Carolina as a result of our Royal Adhesives acquisition that is a designated site under CERCLA.~~financial provision. It is reasonably possible that we may have additional liabilities related to these known environmental matters. However, the full extent of our future liability for environmental matters is difficult to predict because of uncertainty as to the cost of investigation and clean up of the sites, our responsibility for such hazardous substances and the number of and financial condition of other potentially responsible parties.

While uncertainties exist with respect to the amounts and timing of the ultimate environmental liabilities, based on currently available information, we have concluded that these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flow. However, adverse developments and/or periodic settlements could negatively impact the results of operations or cash flows in one or more future periods.

From time to time and in the ordinary course of business, we are a party to, or a target of, lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including product liability, personal injury, contract, patent and intellectual property, environmental, health and safety, tax and employment matters. While we are unable to predict the outcome of these matters, we have concluded, based upon currently available information, that the ultimate resolution of any pending matter, individually or in the aggregate, including ~~the~~ asbestos, ~~litigation described in the following paragraphs, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.~~

We have been named as a defendant in lawsuits in which plaintiffs have alleged injury due to products containing asbestos manufactured more than 30 years ago. The plaintiffs generally bring these lawsuits against multiple defendants and seek damages (both actual and punitive) in very large amounts. In many cases, plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate that they have suffered any compensable injuries or that the injuries suffered were the result of exposure to products manufactured by us. We are typically dismissed as a defendant in such cases without payment. If the plaintiff presents evidence indicating that compensable injury occurred as a result of exposure to our products, the case is generally settled for an amount that reflects the seriousness of the injury, the length, intensity and character of exposure to products containing asbestos, the number and solvency of other defendants in the case, and the jurisdiction in which the case has been brought.

A significant portion of the defense costs and settlements in asbestos-related litigation is paid by third parties, including indemnification pursuant to the provisions of a 1976 agreement under which we acquired a business from a third party. Currently, this third party is defending and paying settlement amounts, under a reservation of rights, in most of the asbestos cases tendered to the third party.

In addition to the indemnification arrangements with third parties, we have insurance policies that generally provide coverage for asbestos liabilities (including defense costs). Historically, insurers have paid a significant portion of our defense costs and settlements in asbestos-related litigation. However, certain of our insurers are insolvent. We have entered into cost-sharing agreements with our insurers that provide for the allocation of defense costs and settlements and judgments in asbestos-related lawsuits. These agreements require, among other things, that we fund a share of settlements and judgments allocable to years in which the responsible insurer is insolvent.

~~A summary of the number of and settlement amounts for asbestos-related lawsuits and claims is as follows:~~

We do not believe that it would be meaningful to disclose the aggregate number of asbestos-related lawsuits filed against us because relatively few of these lawsuits are known to involve exposure to asbestos-containing products that we manufactured. Rather, we believe it is more meaningful to disclose the number of lawsuits that are settled and result in a payment to the plaintiff. To the extent we can reasonably estimate the amount of our probable liabilities for pending asbestos-related claims, we establish a financial provision and a corresponding receivable for insurance recoveries.

~~Based on currently available information, we have concluded that the resolution of any pending matter, including asbestos-related litigation, individually or in the aggregate,~~ will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flow. However, adverse developments and/or periodic settlements could negatively impact the results of operations or cash flows in one or more future periods.

During 2018, we retained legal counsel to conduct an internal investigation of the possible resale of our hygiene products into Iran by certain customers of our subsidiaries in Turkey (beginning in 2011) and India (beginning in 2014), in possible violation of the economic sanctions against Iran administered by OFAC and our compliance policy. The sales to these customers represented less than one percent of our net revenue in ~~each of our last three~~the 2018 fiscal ~~years.~~year. The sales to the customers who were reselling our products into Iran ceased during fiscal year 2018 and we do not currently conduct any business in Iran. In January 2018, we voluntarily contacted OFAC to advise it of this internal investigation and our intention to cooperate fully with OFAC and, in September 2018, we submitted the results and findings of our investigation to OFAC. ~~We have not yet~~In December 2020, we received ~~a response~~formal notification from ~~OFAC. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome or effect~~OFAC that it had completed its review of the Company’s investigation ~~however, based on~~and voluntary disclosure and that OFAC has decided to issue a Cautionary Letter instead of pursuing a civil monetary penalty or taking other enforcement action. While OFAC has indicated that future enforcement action is not precluded if additional information warrants renewed attention, the ~~results of~~Cautionary Letter represents OFAC’s final enforcement response to our investigation ~~to date,~~and voluntary disclosure, so we ~~believe we could incur penalties ranging from zero to $10.0 million.~~now consider this matter closed.

For additional information regarding environmental matters and other legal proceedings, see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol FUL. As of January ~~22, 2019,~~21, 2021, there were ~~1,490~~1,351 common shareholders of record for our common stock.

Table of Contents

Information on our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of ~~2018~~2020 is as follows:

On April 6, 2017, the Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program of up to $200.0 million of our outstanding common shares. Under the program, we are authorized to repurchase shares for cash on the open market, from time to time, in privately negotiated transactions or block transactions, or through an accelerated repurchase agreement. The timing of such repurchases is dependent on price, market conditions and applicable regulatory requirements. Upon repurchase of the shares, we reduced our common stock for the par value of the shares with the excess being applied against additional paid in capital. This authorization replaces the September 30, 2010 authorization to repurchase shares.

Table of Contents

The line graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock for the last five fiscal years with cumulative total return on the S&P Small Cap 600 Index and Dow Jones U.S. Specialty Chemicals Index. This graph assumes a $100 investment in each of H.B. Fuller, the S&P Small Cap 600 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Specialty Chemicals Index at the close of trading on November ~~30, 2013,~~28, 2015, and also assumes the reinvestment of all dividends.

The table that follows presents selected financial data for each of the last five years from the Company’s consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes and with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected financial data set forth below as of ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017~~November 30, 2019 and for the years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018 ~~December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016~~ are derived from our audited financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All other selected financial data set forth below is derived from our audited financial statements not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

H.B. Fuller Company is a global formulator, manufacturer and marketer of adhesives and other specialty chemical products. ~~For the year ended December 2, 2017,~~As of November 30, 2019, we had ~~six~~five reportable segments: Americas Adhesives, EIMEA, Asia Pacific, Construction Adhesives ~~Engineering Adhesives~~ and ~~Royal~~Engineering Adhesives. As of the beginning of fiscal ~~2018, in connection with the integration of the operations of Royal Adhesives with the Company’s other segments,~~2020, we ~~modified~~realigned our operating segment structure ~~by allocating the Royal~~and now have three reportable segments: Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives, ~~segment into each of the five other segments. We began reporting results in five segments for the quarter ended March 3, 2018: Americas Adhesives, EIMEA, Asia Pacific, Construction~~Engineering Adhesives and ~~Engineering~~Construction Adhesives. The change in operating segments is based on how we have organized the company to make operating decisions and assess business performance. Prior period segment information has been recast retrospectively to reflect the realignment.

The ~~Americas~~Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives ~~EIMEA~~operating segment manufactures and ~~Asia Pacific operating segments manufacture and supply~~supplies adhesives products in the assembly, packaging, converting, nonwoven and hygiene, ~~performance wood, insulating glass, flooring, textile,~~health and beauty, flexible packaging, graphic arts and envelope markets. The Engineering Adhesives operating segment provides high-performance adhesives to the transportation, electronics, medical, clean energy, aerospace and defense, performance wood, insulating glass, textile, appliance and heavy machinery markets. The Construction Adhesives operating segment provides floor preparation, grouts and mortars for tile setting, and adhesives for soft flooring, and pressure-sensitive adhesives, tapes and sealants for the commercial roofing industry as well as sealants and related products for heating, ventilation and air conditioning installations. ~~The Engineering Adhesives operating segment provides high-performance adhesives to the transportation, electronics, medical, clean energy, aerospace and defense, appliance and heavy machinery markets.~~

When reviewing our financial statements, it is important to understand how certain external factors impact us. These factors include:

We purchase thousands of raw materials, the majority of which are petroleum/natural gas derivatives. The price of these derivatives impacts the cost of our raw materials. However, the supply of and demand for key raw materials has a greater impact on our costs. As demand increases in high-growth areas, the supply of key raw materials may tighten, resulting in certain materials being put on allocation. Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, also can have an impact as key raw material producers are shut down for extended periods of time. We continually monitor capacity utilization figures, market supply and demand conditions, feedstock costs and inventory levels, as well as derivative and intermediate prices, which affect our raw materials. With approximately 7573 percent of our cost of sales accounted for by raw materials, our financial results are extremely sensitive to changing costs in this area.

The pace of economic growth directly impacts certain industries to which we supply products. For example, adhesives-related revenues from durable goods customers in areas such as appliances, furniture and other woodworking applications tend to fluctuate with the overall economic activity. In business components such as Construction Adhesives and insulating glass in Engineering Adhesives, revenues tend to move with more specific economic indicators such as housing starts and other construction-related activity.

The movement of foreign currency exchange rates as compared to the U.S. dollar impacts the translation of the foreign entities’ financial statements into U.S. dollars. As foreign currencies weaken against the U.S. dollar, our revenues and costs decrease as the foreign currency-denominated financial statements translate into fewer U.S. dollars. The fluctuations of the Euro and the Chinese renminbi against the U.S. dollar have the largest impact on our financial results as compared to all other currencies. In ~~2018,~~2020, currency fluctuations had a negative impact on net revenue of approximately ~~$2.0~~$46.0 million as compared to ~~2017.~~2019.

Table of Contents

Our total year ~~constant currency~~organic sales growth, which we define as the combined variances from sales volume and product pricing, ~~sales mix and business acquisitions, increased 32.0~~decreased 1.6 percent for ~~2018~~2020 compared to ~~2017.~~2019.

In ~~2018,~~2020, our diluted earnings per share was ~~$3.29~~$ 2.36 compared to ~~$1.15~~$2.52 in ~~2017~~2019 and ~~$2.37~~$3.29 in 2016. The higher earnings per share in 2018 compared to 2017 was due to higher net revenue, lower transaction costs related to acquisitions, and one time discrete items related to U.S. Tax Reform, which were partially offset by higher operating expenses mainly due to the impact of acquired businesses and higher interest expense due to higher U.S. debt balances at higher interest rates from the issuance of new debt in 2017.2018. The lower earnings per share in ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~2016~~2019 was due to ~~an increase~~lower net revenue partially offset by lower operating costs, lower income tax expense and lower interest expense. Also, the gain on the sale of our surfactants and thickeners business was recorded in ~~transaction~~2019. The lower earnings per share in 2019 compared to 2018 was due to lower net revenue and higher income tax expense, which were partially offset by lower operating costs and the gain on the sale of our surfactants and thickeners business.

In the first quarter of 2020, we adopted new accounting standards related to ~~acquisitions,~~the accounting for leases which requires us to recognize the assets and liabilities arising from all leases, including ~~make-whole costs associated with~~those classified as operating leases under previous accounting guidance, on the ~~early repayment~~balance sheet and requires disclosure of ~~certain outstanding debt obligations, and the implementation of the 2017 Restructuring Plan.~~

~~Change in Accounting Principle~~key information about leasing arrangements. Prior periods were not restated for this adoption.

In the ~~fourth~~first quarter of ~~2018,~~2019, we ~~elected~~adopted a new accounting standard related to ~~change our method~~revenue recognition which requires us to recognize the amount of revenue to which we expect to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. Prior periods were not restated for this adoption.

In the first quarter of 2019, we also adopted a new accounting ~~for certain inventories~~standard related to the classification of pension expense which requires us to include only the service component of pension expense in operating expenses with the ~~United States within the Company’s Americas Adhesives and Construction Adhesives segments from the last-in, first-out method (“LIFO”) to weighted-average cost.~~other components included in non-operating expenses. We have retrospectively adjusted the Consolidated ~~Financial~~ Statements of Income for ~~all periods presented~~the year ended December 1, 2018 to reflect this change.

In December 2012, our Board of Directors approved a multi-year project to replace and enhance our existing core information technology platforms. The scope for this project includes most of the basic transaction processing for the company including customer orders, procurement, manufacturing, and financial reporting. The project envisions harmonized business processes for all of our operating segments supported with one standard software configuration. The execution of this project, which we refer to as Project ONE, is being supported by internal resources and consulting services. ~~The~~Implementation of Project ONE began in our North America adhesives business ~~went live~~ in ~~2014. In 2017,~~2014 and, through 2020, we ~~began the Project ONE~~completed implementation of this system in various parts of our business including Latin America ~~adhesives~~(except Brazil), Australia and various other business ~~and implementation for all countries, with the exception of Brazil, has been completed as of the end of 2018.~~in North America. During ~~2019~~2021 and beyond, we will continue implementation in North America, EIMEA ~~(Europe, India, Middle East and Africa)~~ and Asia Pacific.

Total expenditures for Project ONE are estimated to be ~~$195~~$170 to ~~$210~~$185 million, of which 50-55% is expected to be capital expenditures. Our total project-to-date expenditures are approximately ~~$73~~$97 million, of which approximately ~~$38~~$48 million are capital expenditures. Given the complexity of the implementation, the total investment to complete the project may exceed our estimate.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, we approved a restructuring plan related to organizational changes and other actions to optimize operations in connection with the realignment of the Company into three global business units (“2020 Restructuring Plan”). We have incurred costs of $13.8 million under this plan as of November 28, 2020. We expect to incur total costs of approximately $20.0 million ($15.8 million after-tax), which includes cash expenditures for severance and related employee costs globally, costs related to streamlining of processes, and other restructuring-related costs. The 2020 Restructuring Plan was implemented in the fourth quarter of 2019 and is currently expected to be completed in 2022.

Table of Contents

~~Restructuring Plan~~s

During the first quarter of 2018, we approved a restructuring plan consisting of consolidation plans, organizational changes and other actions related to the integration of the operations of Royal Adhesives with the operations of the Company (the “Royal Adhesives Restructuring Plan”). In implementing the Royal Adhesives Restructuring Plan, we ~~expect to incur~~have incurred costs of approximately ~~$20.0~~$11.4 million, which includes ~~(i)~~ cash expenditures, ~~of approximately $12.0 million for~~ severance and related employee costs globally and ~~(ii)~~ other costs ~~of approximately $8.0 million~~ related to the optimization of production facilities, streamlining of processes and accelerated depreciation of long-lived assets. Approximately ~~$14.0~~$8.7 million of the costs ~~are expected to be~~were cash costs. ~~For the year ending December 1, 2018, we incurred costs of $6.7 million under this plan.~~ The Royal Adhesives Restructuring Plan was implemented in the first quarter of 2018 and is ~~currently expected to be completed by the end of fiscal year 2020.~~

During the first quarter of 2017, we approved a restructuring plan (the “2017 Restructuring Plan”) related to organizational changes and other actions to optimize operations. In implementing the 2017 Restructuring Plan, we incurred costs of $20.2 million as of December 1, 2018 which included cash expenditures of approximately $11.3 million for severance and related employee costs globally and $8.9 million related to the optimization of production facilities, streamlining of processes and accelerated depreciation of long-lived assets. Approximately $15.8 million of the costs were cash costs. The 2017 Restructuring Plan is substantially complete.

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law H.R. 1, originally known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”, hereafter referred to as “U.S. Tax Reform”. Since the passing of U.S. Tax Reform, additional guidance in the form of notices and proposed regulations which interpret various aspects of U.S. Tax Reform have been issued. As of the filing of this document, additional guidance is expected. Changes could be made to the proposed regulations as they become finalized, future legislation could be enacted, more regulations and notices could be issued, all of which may impact our financial results. We will continue to monitor all of these changes and will reflect the impact as appropriate in future financial statements. Many state and local tax jurisdictions are still determining how they will interpret elements of U.S. Tax Reform. Final state and local governments’ conformity and legislation or guidance relating to U.S. Tax Reform may impact our financial results.

Given the varying effective dates of specific components of U.S. Tax Reform coupled with our fiscal year end, we will be required to consider additional elements of U.S. Tax Reform, including the significant changes related to taxation of international operations that we were not subject to during our fiscal year ended December 1, 2018. Such elements will be included for our fiscal year ended November 30, 2019.

Management’s discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition are based upon the Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We believe the critical accounting policies and areas that require the most significant judgments and estimates to be used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements relate to pension and other postretirement plans; goodwill impairment; long-lived assets recoverability; valuation of product, environmental and other litigation liabilities; valuation of deferred tax assets and accuracy of tax contingencies; and valuation of acquired assets and liabilities.

Goodwill is the excess of cost of an acquired entity over the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a purchase business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our reporting units, which are our operating segments or one level below our operating segments (the component level). Reporting units are determined by the discrete financial information available for the component and whether it is regularly reviewed by segment management. Components are aggregated into a single reporting unit if they share similar economic characteristics. Our reporting units are as follows: Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives, Engineering Adhesives and Construction Adhesives.

We evaluate our goodwill for impairment annually at the beginning of the fourth quarter or earlier upon the occurrence of substantive unfavorable changes in economic conditions, industry trends, costs, cash flows, or ongoing declines in market capitalization. The quantitative impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, the assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units, and the determination of fair value of each reporting unit. The impairment test requires the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing the impairment test, we determined the fair value of our reporting units through the income approach by using discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analyses. Determining fair value requires the Company to make judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis for each reporting unit are based on the reporting unit's budget, long-term business plan, and recent operating performance. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the future cash flows of the respective reporting unit and market conditions. Given the inherent uncertainty in determining the assumptions underlying a DCF analysis, actual results may differ from those used in our valuations. In assessing the reasonableness of the determined fair values, we also reconciled the aggregate determined fair value of the Company to the Company's market capitalization, which, at the date of our 2020 impairment test, included a 21 percent control premium.

For the 2020 impairment test, the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the respective carrying values by 9 percent to 85 percent ("headroom"). Significant assumptions used in the DCF analysis included discount rates that ranged from 7.5 percent to 9.3 percent and long-term revenue growth rates. The Construction Adhesives reporting unit had headroom of 9 percent. An increase in the discount rate of 55 basis points or a decrease in the long-term revenue growth rates of 45 percent would result in the fair value of the Construction Adhesives reporting unit falling below its carrying value. The Engineering Adhesives and Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives reporting units had significant fair value in excess of carrying value.

Table of Contents

As of November 28, 2020, the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the Construction Adhesives reporting unit was $311.0 million. Management will continue to monitor these reporting units for changes in the business environment that could impact recoverability. The recoverability of goodwill is dependent upon the continued growth of cash flows from our business activities. If the economy or business environment falter and we are unable to achieve our assumed revenue growth rates or profit margin percentages, our projections used would need to be remeasured, which could impact the carrying value of our goodwill in one or more of our reporting units. Most significantly, for our Construction Adhesives reporting unit, a decrease in the planned volume revenue growth would negatively impact the fair value of the reporting unit and the calculation of excess carrying value.

See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding goodwill.

The discount rate assumption is determined using an actuarial yield curve approach, which results in a discount rate that reflects the characteristics of the plan. The approach identifies a broad population of corporate bonds that meet the quality and size criteria for the particular plan. We use this approach rather than a specific index that has a certain set of bonds that may or may not be representative of the characteristics of our particular plan. A higher discount rate reduces the present value of the pension obligations. The discount rate for the U.S. pension plan was 2.53 percent at November 28, 2020, as compared to 3.19 percent at November 30, 2019 and 4.51 percent at December 1, ~~2018, as compared to 3.73 percent at December 2, 2017 and 4.10 percent at December 3, 2016.~~2018. Net periodic pension cost for a given fiscal year is based on assumptions developed at the end of the previous fiscal year. A discount rate ~~reduction~~change of 0.5 percentage points at ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 would ~~decrease~~impact U.S. pension and other postretirement plan (income) expense ~~less than $0.1~~by approximately $0.2 million (pre-tax) in fiscal ~~2019.~~2021. Discount rates for non-U.S. plans are determined in a manner consistent with the U.S. plans.

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for the U.S. pension plan was ~~7.75~~7.50 percent in ~~2018, 2017~~2020 and ~~2016.~~7.50 in 2019 and 7.75 in 2018. Our expected long-term rate of return on U.S. plan assets was based on our target asset allocation assumption of 60 percent equities and 40 percent fixed-income. Management, in conjunction with our external financial advisors, determines the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets by considering the expected future returns and volatility levels for each asset class that are based on historical returns and forward looking observations. For ~~2018,~~2020, the expected long-term rate of return on the target equities allocation was ~~8.25~~8.00 percent and the expected long-term rate of return on the target fixed-income allocation was ~~5.6~~3.60 percent. The total plan rate of return assumption included an estimate of the effect of diversification and the plan expense. For 2019, the expected long-term rate of return on assets will be 7.50 percent with an expected long-term rate of return on the target equities allocation of 8.2 percent and an expected long-term rate of return on target fixed-income allocation of 5.6 percent. A change of 0.5 percentage points for the expected return on assets assumption would impact U.S. net pension and other postretirement plan expense by approximately ~~$2.1~~$2.5 million (pre-tax).

Management, in conjunction with our external financial advisors, uses the actual historical rates of return of the asset categories to assess the reasonableness of the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The most recent 10-year and 20-year historical equity returns are shown in the table below. Our expected rate of return on our total portfolio is consistent with the historical patterns observed over longer time frames.

* Beginning in 2006, our target allocation migrated from 100 percent equities to our current allocation of 60 percent equities and 40 percent fixed-income. The historical actual rate of return for the fixed income of ~~7.0~~8.2 percent is since inception ~~(12~~(14 years, 11 months).

Table of Contents

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for non-U.S. pension plans was a weighted-average of ~~6.20~~6.23 percent in ~~2018~~2020 compared to 6.21 percent in ~~2017~~2019 and 6.20 percent in ~~2016.~~2018. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption used in each non-U.S. plan is determined on a plan-by-plan basis for each local jurisdiction and is based on expected future returns for the investment mix of assets currently in the portfolio for that plan. Management, in conjunction with our external financial advisors, develops expected rates of return for each plan, considers expected long-term returns for each asset category in the plan, reviews expectations for inflation for each local jurisdiction, and estimates the effect of active management of the plan’s assets. Our largest non-U.S. pension plans are in the United Kingdom and Germany. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for the United Kingdom was 6.75 percent and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for Germany was 5.75 percent. Management, in conjunction with our external financial advisors, uses actual historical returns of the asset portfolio to assess the reasonableness of the expected rate of return for each plan.

The projected salary increase assumption is based on historic trends and comparisons to the external market. Higher rates of increase result in higher pension expenses. As this rate is also a long-term expected rate, it is less likely to change on an annual basis. In the U.S., we have used the rate of 4.50 percent for ~~2018, 2017~~2020, 2019 and ~~2016.~~2018. Benefits under the U.S. Pension Plan were locked-in as of May 31, 2011 and no longer include compensation increases. The 4.50 percent rate is for the supplemental executive retirement plan only. Projected salary increase assumptions for non-U.S. plans are determined in a manner consistent with the U.S. plans.

Goodwill is the excess of cost of an acquired entity over the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a purchase business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our reporting units, which are our operating segments or one level below our operating segments (the component level). Reporting units are determined by the discrete financial information available for the component and whether it is regularly reviewed by segment management. Components are aggregated into a single reporting unit if they share similar economic characteristics. Our reporting units are as follows: Americas Adhesives, EIMEA, Asia Pacific, Flooring, Roofing, Specialty Construction, Engineering Adhesives and Tonsan.

We evaluate our goodwill for impairment annually as of the end of our third quarter or earlier upon the occurrence of substantive unfavorable changes in economic conditions, industry trends, costs, cash flows, or ongoing declines in market capitalization. For fiscal 2018, we performed an initial quantitative goodwill impairment test as of the end of the third quarter which resulted in no indicators of impairment for any of our reporting units. However, upon the decrease of our stock price and management’s reassessment of its long-term business plan during the fourth quarter of 2018, we updated our quantitative goodwill impairment test as of December 1, 2018. The quantitative impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, the assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units, and the determination of fair value of each reporting unit. The impairment test requires the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing the impairment test, we determined the fair value of our reporting units by using discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analyses. Determining fair value requires the Company to make judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis for each reporting unit are based on the reporting unit's budget, long-term business plan, and recent operating performance. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the future cash flows of the respective reporting unit and market conditions. Given the inherent uncertainty in determining the assumptions underlying a DCF analysis, actual results may differ from those used in our valuations. In assessing the reasonableness of the determined fair values, we also reconciled the aggregate determined fair value of the Company to the Company's market capitalization, which, at the date of our fourth quarter 2018 impairment test, included an 11% control premium.

For the fourth quarter 2018 test, the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the respective carrying values by 16% to 122% ("headroom"). Significant assumptions used in the DCF included long-term growth rates and discount rates that ranged from 9.0% to 10.8%. An increase in the discount and decrease in the long-term growth rates of 0.5% would result in the fair value of the reporting units exceeding their respective carrying values by 5% to 104%.

The Roofing reporting unit, which had headroom of 18%, and EIMEA reporting unit, which had headroom of 16%, were the only reporting units with fair value in excess of carrying value of less than 20%. As of December 1, 2018, the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the Roofing and EIMEA reporting units were $175.0 and $190.2 million, respectively. Management will continue to monitor these reporting units for changes in the business environment that could impact recoverability. The recoverability of goodwill is dependent upon the continued growth of cash flows from our business activities. If the economy or business environment falter and we are unable to achieve our assumed revenue growth rates or profit margin percentages, our projections used would need to be remeasured, which could impact the carrying value of our goodwill in one or more of our reporting units. Most significantly, for our Roofing reporting unit, a decrease in the planned volume revenue growth would negatively impact the fair value of the reporting unit and the calculation of excess carrying value. For our EIMEA reporting unit, not achieving cost savings due to plant consolidation efforts currently underway would negatively impact the fair value of the reporting unit and the calculation of excess carrying value.

~~See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding goodwill.~~

The assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets reflects our assumptions and estimates. Factors that we must estimate when performing impairment tests include sales volume, prices, inflation, currency exchange rates, tax rates and capital spending. Significant judgment is involved in estimating these factors, and they include inherent uncertainties. The measurement of the recoverability of these assets is dependent upon the accuracy of the assumptions used in making these estimates and how the estimates compare to the eventual future operating performance of the specific businesses to which the assets are attributed.

Judgments made by us include the expected useful lives of long-lived assets. The ability to realize undiscounted cash flows in excess of the carrying amounts of such assets is affected by factors such as the ongoing maintenance and improvement of the assets, changes in economic conditions and changes in operating performance.

As disclosed in Item 3. Legal Proceedings and in Note 1 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we are subject to various claims, lawsuits and other legal proceedings. Reserves for loss contingencies associated with these matters are established when it is determined that a liability is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The assessment of the probable liabilities is based on the facts and circumstances known at the time that the financial statements are being prepared. For cases in which it is determined that a liability is probable but only a range for the potential loss exists, the minimum amount of the range is recorded and subsequently adjusted as better information becomes available.

For cases in which insurance coverage is available, the gross amount of the estimated liabilities is accrued, and a receivable is recorded for any probable estimated insurance recoveries. A discussion of environmental, product and other litigation liabilities is disclosed in Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Based upon currently available facts, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any pending legal proceeding, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our long-term financial condition. However, adverse developments and/or periodic settlements could negatively affect our results of operations or cash flows in one or more future quarters.

Table of Contents

As part of the process of preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to estimate income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. The process involves estimating actual current tax expense along with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for book and tax purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. Increases in the valuation allowance result in additional expense to be reflected within the tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, the valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets totaled ~~$14.1~~$21.8 million.

We recognize tax benefits for tax positions for which it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained by the applicable tax authority at the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We do not recognize a financial statement benefit for a tax position that does not meet the more-likely-than-not threshold. We believe that our liabilities for income taxes reflect the most likely outcome. It is difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of the resolution of any particular tax position. Future changes in judgment related to the resolution of tax positions will impact earnings in the quarter of such change. We adjust our income tax liabilities related to tax positions in light of changing facts and circumstances. Settlement with respect to a tax position would usually require cash. Based upon our analysis of tax positions taken on prior year returns and expected tax positions to be taken for the current year tax returns, we have identified gross uncertain tax positions of ~~$8.4~~$14.6 million as of ~~December 1, 2018.~~November 28, 2020.

We have not recorded U.S. deferred income taxes for certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries undistributed earnings as such amounts are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. Should we change our business strategies related to these non-U.S. subsidiaries, additional U.S. tax liabilities could be incurred. It is not practical to estimate the amount of these additional tax liabilities. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on income tax accounting.

As we enter into business combinations, we perform acquisition accounting requirements including the following:

We complete valuation procedures and record the resulting fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based upon the valuation of the business enterprise and the tangible and intangible assets acquired. Enterprise value allocation methodology requires management to make assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If estimates or assumptions used to complete the enterprise valuation and estimates of the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities significantly differed from assumptions made, the resulting difference could materially affect the fair value of net assets.

The calculation of the fair value of the tangible assets, including property, plant and equipment, utilizes the cost approach, which computes the cost to replace the asset, less accrued depreciation resulting from physical deterioration, functional obsolescence and external obsolescence. The calculation of the fair value of the identified intangible assets are determined using cash flow models following the income approach or a discounted market-based methodology approach. Significant inputs include estimated revenue growth rates, gross margins, operating expenses, and estimated attrition, royalty and discount rates. Goodwill is recorded as the difference in the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and the purchase price.

Net revenue ~~in 2018 increased 31.9 percent from 2017. The 2017 net revenue was 10.1 percent higher than the net revenue in 2016. Every five or six years we have a 53~~^rd ~~week in our fiscal year. 2016 was a 53-week year which contributed approximately 2.0 percent to net revenue in 2016, primarily related to volume. In analyzing our results~~

Table of ~~operations from period to period, we~~Contents

We review variances in net revenue in terms of changes related to sales volume, product pricing, ~~sales mix,~~ business acquisitions and divestitures (M&A) and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. ~~The impact of sales volume, product pricing, sales mix and acquisitions including Royal Adhesives, Adecol and Wisdom, Cyberbond, L.L.C. and Advanced Adhesives are viewed as constant currency growth.~~ The following table shows the net revenue variance analysis ~~for~~ the past two years:

~~Constant currency~~Organic growth was ~~32.0~~a negative 1.6 percent in ~~2018~~2020 compared to ~~2017. The 32.0~~2019 driven by a 6.7 percent ~~constant currency~~decrease in Construction Adhesives and a 5.5 percent decrease in Engineering Adhesives, partially offset by 3.3 percent growth in ~~2018~~Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives. The decrease was driven by ~~71.4~~a decrease in sales volume and product pricing. There was a 0.5 percent growth in Construction Adhesives, 57.1 percent growth in Engineering Adhesives, 29.9 percent growth in EIMEA, 21.2 percent growth in Americas Adhesives and 5.1 percent growth in Asia Pacific. Constant currency growth in 2018 includes 28.3 percent growth attributabledecrease due to the ~~acquisition~~divestiture of ~~Royal Adhesives~~our surfactants and ~~Adecol.~~thickeners business during 2019. The negative ~~0.1~~1.6 percent currency impact was primarily driven by a weaker Brazilian real, Turkish lira, Argentinian peso, ~~Australian dollar, Canadian dollar~~Mexican peso and ~~Turkish lira~~Colombian peso partially offset by a stronger ~~Mexican peso, Chinese renminbi~~Euro and ~~Euro~~Egyptian pound compared to the U.S. dollar.

~~Constant currency~~Organic growth was ~~12.3~~a negative 1.1 percent in ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~2016. The inclusion of a 53~~^rd ~~week in 2016 negatively impacted 2017 constant currency sales growth by approximately 2.0 percent. The 12.3 percent constant currency growth in 2017 was~~2018 driven by ~~24.2~~a 12.0 percent decrease in Construction Adhesives, partially offset by 1.2 percent growth in Engineering Adhesives ~~12.6~~and 0.6 percent growth in ~~Americas Adhesives, 9.5~~Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives. The decrease was predominately driven by a decrease in sales volume. There was a 0.3 percent ~~growth in Asia Pacific, 4.3 percent growth in EIMEA and 1.5 percent growth in Construction Adhesives. Constant currency growth in 2017 includes 3.7 percent growth attributable~~decrease due to the ~~acquisition~~divestiture of ~~Royal Adhesives.~~our surfactants and thickeners business during 2019. The negative ~~2.2~~3.3 percent currency impact was primarily driven by a weaker ~~Egyptian pound, Turkish lira,~~Euro, Chinese renminbi, Argentinian peso, ~~Mexican peso~~Brazilian real and ~~Malaysian ringgit partially offset by a stronger Euro, Indian rupee and Australian dollar~~Turkish lira compared to the U.S. dollar.

Cost of sales in 2020 compared to 2019 increased 80 basis points as a percentage of net revenue. Raw material ~~costs~~cost as a percentage of net revenue decreased ~~130~~10 basis points in ~~2018~~2020 compared to ~~2017 due to an increase in product pricing and the impact of the Royal Adhesives acquisition.~~2019. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue ~~was flat~~increased 90 basis points in 2020 compared to ~~2017. As~~2019 primarily due to the impact of lower net revenue and higher manufacturing costs.

Cost of sales in 2019 compared to 2018 decreased 70 basis points as a ~~result,~~percentage of net revenue. Raw material cost ~~of sales~~ as a percentage of net revenue decreased ~~130~~160 basis points in 2019 compared to ~~2017.~~

~~Raw~~2018 primarily due to an increase in product pricing and lower raw material costs. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue increased ~~240~~90 basis points in ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~2016~~2018 primarily due to ~~higher raw material costs and~~ the impact of ~~acquired businesses including the inventory step up related to our recent acquisitions. Other~~lower sales volume and higher manufacturing ~~costs as a percentage of revenue increased 40 basis points compared to 2016 driven primarily by the impact of acquired businesses~~waste and ~~the implementation of the 2017 Restructuring Plan. As a result, cost of sales as a percentage of net revenue increased 270 basis points compared to 2016.~~scrap costs.

Gross profit in ~~2018 increased $231.8 million~~2020 decreased 6.2 percent and gross profit margin decreased 80 basis points compared to ~~2017~~2019. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily due to lower net revenue and higher manufacturing costs.

Gross profit in 2019 decreased 2.6 percent and gross profit margin increased ~~130~~70 basis ~~points.~~points compared to 2018. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily due to ~~favorable~~increased product pricing and ~~the impact of the Royal Adhesives acquisition~~lower raw material costs partially offset by lower sales volume and ~~lower restructuring plan~~higher manufacturing waste and scrap costs.

Gross profit in 2017 decreased $0.7 million compared to 2016 and gross profit margin decreased 270 basis points. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily due to higher raw material costs, the impact

Table of ~~acquired businesses and the implementation of the 2017 Restructuring Plan.~~

Selling, general and administrative expenses

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

SG&A
$ 582.1 $ 477.0 $ 407.6 22.0 % 17.0 %
Percent of net revenue
19.1 % 20.7 % 19.5 %
Contents

SG~~&A”)~~&A expenses for ~~2018 increased $105.1~~2020 decreased $42.6 million, or ~~22.0~~7.3 percent, compared to ~~2017.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease is ~~mainly~~primarily due to cost savings realized from our business realignment to three segments and lower discretionary spending.

SG&A expenses for 2019 decreased $9.4 million, or 1.6 percent, compared to 2018. The decrease is primarily due to general spending reductions and the favorable impact of ~~acquired businesses and the impact of unfavorable~~ foreign currency exchange rates on spending outside the U.S.

Other income, net includes foreign transaction losses of $3.1 million, $1.2 million and $4.5 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Loss on disposal of assets was $0.1 million in 2020 and gains on disposal of assets were $24.1 million and $3.1 in 2019 and 2018, respectively. Defined benefit pension benefit was $17.9 million, $13.7 million and $16.9 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Other income of $0.7 million, $1.3 million and $2.6 million was also included in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Interest expense was $86.8 million, $103.3 million and $111.0 million of interest expense in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The decrease in interest expense is due to lower U.S. debt balances. We capitalized $0.6 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million of interest expense in 2020, 2019 and 2018 respectively.

Interest income in 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $11.4 million, $12.2 million and $11.7 million, respectively.

Income tax expense of $41.9 million in 2020 includes $1.1 million of discrete tax expense, primarily related to tax expense for ~~2017 increased $69.4~~uncertain tax positions and several foreign discrete items, offset by U.S. benefits for state deferred rate changes and a benefit related to the revaluation of cross-currency swap agreements due to appreciation of the Euro versus US dollar. Excluding the discrete tax expense of $1.1 million, ~~or 17.0 percent~~the overall effective tax rate was 25.8 percent. The increase in the overall effective tax rate for 2020 compared to ~~2016. The increase~~2019, excluding the impact of discrete items, is ~~mainly~~primarily due to the ~~impact~~ongoing effects of ~~acquired businesses, transaction costs~~U.S. Tax Reform.

Income tax expense of $49.4 million in 2019 includes $12.4 million of discrete tax expense related to ~~acquisitions~~the sale of the surfactants and ~~higher variable compensation, partially offset by lower expenses related~~thickeners business and return to ~~general spending reductions and~~accrual adjustments. Excluding the discrete tax expense of $12.4 million, the overall effective tax rate was 24.9 percent. The decrease in the overall effective tax rate for 2019 compared to 2018, excluding the impact of ~~favorable foreign currency exchange rates on spending outside~~discrete items, is primarily due to the ~~U.S.~~

Table of Contents

Special charges, net

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Special charges, net
$ - $ - $ (0.2 )

The following table provides detail of special charges, net:

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Acquisition and transformation related costs
$ - $ - $ 0.2
Facility exit costs
- - (0.6 )
Other related costs
- - 0.2
Special charges, net
$ - $ - $ (0.2 )

Acquisition and transformation related costs of $0.2 million for the year ended December 3, 2016 include costs related to organization consulting, financial advisory and legal services necessary to integrate the industrial adhesives business we acquired in March 2012 into our existing operating segments. During the year ended December 3, 2016, we incurred cash facility exit costs of $1.3 million, non-cash facility exit costs of $1.7 million and other incremental transformation related costs of $0.2 million. Also included in facility exit costs for 2016 is a $3.6 million gain on the sale of our production facility located in Wels, Austria.

Other income (expense), net

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Other income (expense), net
$ 1.2 $ (27.7 ) $ (9.6 )

Other income (expense), net includes foreign currency transaction losses of $4.5 million, $2.4 million and $9.5 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets was $3.1 million, nil and ($0.8) million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Other income (expense), net for 2017 also included $25.5 million of expense related to make-whole costs associated with the early repayment of certain outstanding debt obligations which were refinanced upon entering into the Term Loan B Credit Agreement (as described in Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements).

Interest expense

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Interest expense
$ 111.0 $ 43.7 $ 27.4

Interest expense was $111.0 million, $43.7 million and $27.4 million for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The higher interest expense in 2018 compared to 2017 was due primarily to higher U.S. debt balances at higher interest rates from the issuance of our 4.000% Notes and higher LIBOR rates on floating rate debt held in the U.S. The higher interest expense in 2017 compared to 2016 was due to higher U.S. debt balances from the issuance of our Term Loan B Credit Agreement and the Public Notes and the write-off of capitalized debt issuance costs on repaid debt facilities. We capitalized interest of $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.8 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Interest income

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Interest income
$ 11.7 $ 3.9 $ 2.0

Interest income was $11.7 million, $3.9 million and $2.0 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest income in 2018 was higher due to our cross-currency swap cash flow hedges that were entered into at the end of 2017 in conjunction with the Royal Adhesives acquisition.

~~Table of Contents~~

Income tax benefit (expense)

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Income tax benefit (expense)
$ 6.4 $ (9.8 ) $ (48.9 )
Effective tax rate
4.1 % (16.2 )% (29.9 )%

The income tax benefit in 2018 of $6.4 million includes $49.0 million of discrete tax benefits in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, primarily related to the impact of U.S. Tax Reform. ~~Income tax expense in 2017 of $9.8 million includes $4.1 million of~~Excluding the discrete tax benefits ~~in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, primarily related to the release~~ of ~~the valuation allowance in Brazil in conjunction with the Adecol acquisition. Income tax expense in 2016 of $48.9~~$49.0 million, ~~included $2.6 million of discrete tax benefits in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions.Excluding discrete items,~~ the overall effective tax rate increased by 4.2 percentage points in 2018 as compared to 2017 and decreased by 8.5 percentage points in 2017 as compared to 2016. The increase in the tax rate is principally due to an increase in the effective rate outside the U.S. due to a change in the geographic mix of pre-tax earnings, as well as withholding tax expense in foreign jurisdictions.was 27.2 percent.

Income from equity method investments

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Income from equity method investments
$ 8.2 $ 8.7 $ 7.4

Income from equity method investments

($ in millions)		2020				2019				2018
Income from equity method investments		$	7.4			$	7.4			$	8.2

The income from equity method investments relates to our 50 percent ownership of the Sekisui-Fuller joint venture in Japan. The lower income for ~~2018~~2020 and 2019 compared to ~~2017~~2018 relates to lower net income in our joint venture. ~~The higher income for 2017 compared to 2016 relates to higher net income in our joint venture.~~

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
$ - $ - $ (0.3 )

~~The net~~Net income attributable to ~~non-controlling interests related to the redeemable non-controlling interest in~~ H.B. Fuller ~~Kimya Sanayi Ticaret A.S. (HBF Kimya). During fiscal 2017, we purchased the remaining shares from the non-controlling shareholder.~~

Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller

($ in millions)	2018			2017			2016			2018 vs 2017			2017 vs 2016			2020			2019			2018			2020 vs 2019			2019 vs 2018
Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller	$	171.2		$	59.4		$	121.7			188.2	%		(51.2	)%	$	123.7		$	130.8		$	171.2			(5.4	)%		(23.6	)%
Percent of net revenue		5.6	%		2.6	%		5.8	%								4.4	%		4.5	%		5.6	%

Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller was $123.7 million in 2020 compared to $130.8 million in 2019 and $171.2 million in ~~2018 compared to $59.4 million in 2017 and $121.7 million in 2016.~~2018. Diluted earnings per share ~~was~~were $2.36 per share in 2020, $2.52 per share for 2019 and $3.29 per share ~~in 2018, $1.15 per share~~ for ~~2017 and $2.37 per share for 2016.~~2018.

Operating Segment Results

We are required to report segment information in the same way that we internally organize our business for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources. For segment evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, segment operating income is defined as gross profit less SG&A expenses. ~~Segment operating income excludes special charges, net.~~ Inter-segment revenues are recorded at cost plus a markup for administrative costs. Corporate expenses are fully allocated to each operating segment.

~~For the year ended December 2, 2017,~~As of November 30, 2019, we had ~~six~~five reportable segments: Americas Adhesives, EIMEA, Asia Pacific, Construction Adhesives ~~Engineering Adhesives~~ and ~~Royal~~Engineering Adhesives. As of the beginning of fiscal ~~2018, in connection with the integration of the operations of Royal Adhesives with the Company’s other segments,~~2020, we ~~modified~~realigned our operating segment structure ~~by allocating the Royal~~and now have three reportable segments: Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives, ~~segment into each of the five other segments. We began reporting results in five segments for the quarter ended March 3, 2018: Americas Adhesives, EIMEA, Asia Pacific, Construction~~Engineering Adhesives and ~~Engineering~~Construction Adhesives. The change in operating segments is based on how we have organized the Company to make operating decisions and assess business performance. Prior period segment information has been recast retrospectively to reflect the realignment.

~~Table of Contents~~

The tables below provide certain information regarding the net revenue and segment operating income ~~(loss)~~ of each of our operating segments.

Net Revenue by Segment

2018

2017

2016

Net

% of

Net

% of

Net

% of

($ in millions)

Revenue

Total

Revenue

Total

Revenue

Total

Americas Adhesives
$ 1,099.9 36 % $ 907.8 39 % $ 806.1 38 %
EIMEA
738.5 24 % 568.6 25 % 545.1 26 %
Asia Pacific
278.1 9 % 264.7 12 % 241.8 12 %
Construction Adhesives
446.1 15 % 260.3 11 % 256.4 12 %
Engineering Adhesives
478.4 16 % 304.6 13 % 245.2 12 %
Total
$ 3,041.0 100 % $ 2,306.0 100 % $ 2,094.6 100 %

Beginning in 2020, certain amounts are included within Corporate Unallocated instead of within the operating segments to better align with our internal management view of financial information. Corporate Unallocated includes acquisition and integration-related charges, restructuring-related charges, the results of business divestitures and costs related to the implementation of Project ONE.

Segment Operating Income (Loss)

2018

2017

2016

Operating

% of

Operating

% of

Operating

% of

($ in millions)

Income

Total

Income (Loss)

Total

Income

Total

Americas Adhesives
$ 115.4 45 % $ 91.2 71 % $ 122.0 61 %
EIMEA
40.1 16 % 18.8 15 % 40.1 20 %
Asia Pacific
18.0 7 % 14.8 12 % 15.4 8 %
Construction Adhesives
32.9 13 % (13.0 ) (11 )% 3.3 2 %
Engineering Adhesives
48.4 19 % 16.2 13 % 17.4 9 %
Total
$ 254.8 100 % $ 128.0 100 % $ 198.2 100 %

Net Revenue by Segment

~~The following table provides a reconciliation of segment operating income to income before income taxes and income from equity method investments, as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income.~~

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Segment operating income
$ 254.8 $ 128.0 $ 198.2
Special charges, net
- - 0.2
Other income (expense), net
1.2 (27.6 ) (9.6 )
Interest expense
(111.0 ) (43.7 ) (27.4 )
Interest income
11.7 3.9 2.0
Income before income taxes and income from equity method investments
$ 156.7 $ 60.6 $ 163.4

	2020					2019					2018
	Net		% of			Net		% of			Net		% of
($ in millions)	Revenue		Total			Revenue		Total			Revenue		Total
Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives	$	1,332.8		48	%	$	1,328.3		46	%	$	1,375.6		46	%
Engineering Adhesives		1,088.3		39	%		1,158.4		40	%		1,186.5		39	%
Construction Adhesives		369.2		13	%		396.6		14	%		454.2		15	%
Segment total		2,790.3		100	%		2,883.3		100	%		3,016.3		100	%
Corporate Unallocated		-		0	%		13.7		0	%		24.7		0	%
Total	$	2,790.3		100	%	$	2,897.0		100	%	$	3,041.0		100	%

Table of Contents

Americas Adhesives

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Net revenue
$ 1,099.9 $ 907.8 $ 806.1 21.2 % 12.6 %
Segment operating income
$ 115.4 $ 91.2 $ 122.0 26.5 % (25.2 )%
Segment profit margin %
10.5 % 10.0 % 15.1 %

Segment Operating Income (Loss)

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Constant currency growth
23.9 % 12.8 %
Currency
(2.7 )% (0.2 )%
Total
21.2 % 12.6 %

	2020						2019						2018
	Operating			% of			Operating			% of			Operating			% of
($ in millions)	Income (Loss)			Total			Income (Loss)			Total			Income (Loss)			Total
Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives	$	130.8			60	%	$	116.0			51	%	$	120.5			51	%
Engineering Adhesives		104.0			48	%		136.3			60	%		119.4			50	%
Construction Adhesives		11.1			5	%		16.6			7	%		39.1			16	%
Segment total		245.9			113	%		268.9			118	%		279.0			117	%
Corporate Unallocated		(27.6	)		(13	)%		(42.9	)		(18	)%		(41.1	)		(17	)%
Total	$	218.3			100	%	$	226.0			100	%	$	237.9			100	%

The following table provides a reconciliation of segment operating income to income before income taxes and income from equity method investments, as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

($ in millions)	2020			2019			2018
Segment operating income	$	218.3		$	226.0		$	237.9
Other income, net		15.4			37.9			18.1
Interest expense		(86.8	)		(103.3	)		(111.0	)
Interest income		11.4			12.2			11.7
Income before income taxes and income from equity method investments	$	158.3		$	172.8		$	156.7

Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives

($ in millions)	2020		2019			2018			2020 vs 2019			2019 vs 2018
Net revenue	$	1,332.8	$	1,328.3		$	1,375.6			0.3	%		(3.4	)%
Segment operating income	$	130.8	$	116.0		$	120.5			12.8	%		(3.7	)%
Segment profit margin %				9.8	%		8.7	%		8.8	%

The following tables provide details of Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives net revenue variances:

	2020 vs 2019			2019 vs 2018
Organic growth		3.3	%		0.6	%
Currency		(3.0	)%		(4.0	)%
Total		0.3	%		(3.4	)%

Net revenue increased ~~21.2~~0.3 percent in ~~2018~~2020 compared to ~~2017.~~2019. The ~~23.9~~3.3 percent increase in ~~constant currency~~organic growth was attributable to an ~~18.7 percent~~ increase in sales volume, ~~including~~partially offset by a ~~22.1 percent increase due to the Royal Adhesives, Adecol and Wisdom acquisitions, a 3.8 percent increase~~decrease in product ~~pricing and a 1.4 percent increase in sales mix.~~pricing. The ~~2.7~~ negative currency effect was ~~primarily~~ due to the weaker Brazilian real, ~~and~~ Argentinian peso, Turkish lira, Mexican peso and Colombian peso partially offset by a stronger Egyptian pound and Euro compared to the U.S. dollar. As a percentage of net revenue, raw material costs decreased 9050 basis ~~points mainly due to an increase in product pricing and the impact of acquired businesses.~~points. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue increased 9040 basis ~~points, primarily due to higher delivery costs and the impact of acquired businesses. Operating expense~~points. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased 50100 basis ~~points.~~points in 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to costs savings realized from our business realignment to three segments and lower discretionary spending. Segment operating income increased ~~26.5~~12.8 percent and segment operating margin as a percentage of net revenue increased 50110 basis points in ~~2018~~2020 as compared to ~~2017.~~2019.

Table of Contents

Net revenue ~~increased 12.6~~decreased 3.4 percent in ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~2016.~~2018. The ~~12.8~~0.6 percent increase in ~~constant currency~~organic growth was attributable to ~~a 14.0 percent increase in sales volume, including an 11.1 percent increase due to the Royal Adhesives, Adecol and Wisdom acquisitions,~~increased product pricing, partially offset by ~~an unfavorable 0.8 percent~~a decrease in sales ~~mix and a 0.4 percent decrease in product pricing.~~volume. The ~~0.2 percent~~ negative currency effect was due to the weaker Argentinian peso, ~~and Mexican peso, offset by the stronger~~Euro, Turkish lira, Brazilian real and ~~Canadian dollar~~Chinese renminbi compared to the U.S. dollar. As a percentage of net revenue, raw material costs ~~increased 320~~decreased 120 basis points ~~mainly~~primarily due to ~~higher~~increased product pricing and lower raw material ~~costs and the inventory step up related to the Wisdom, Adecol and Royal Adhesives acquisitions.~~costs. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue increased ~~120~~80 basis points primarily due to ~~the acquisition and integration of Wisdom Adhesives.~~lower sales volume. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue increased 7030 basis points ~~due~~in 2019 as compared to ~~the impact of the Royal Adhesives acquisition.~~2018. Segment operating income decreased ~~25.2~~3.7 percent and segment operating margin as a percentage of net revenue decreased ~~510~~10 basis points in ~~2017~~2019 as compared to ~~2016.~~2018.

EIMEA

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Net revenue
$ 738.5 $ 568.6 $ 545.1 29.9 % 4.3 %
Segment operating income
$ 40.1 $ 18.8 $ 40.1 113.3 % (53.1 )%
Segment profit margin %
5.4 % 3.3 % 7.4 %

Engineering Adhesives

~~The following table provides details of the EIMEA net revenue variances:~~

($ in millions)	2020			2019			2018			2020 vs 2019			2019 vs 2018
Net revenue	$	1,088.3		$	1,158.4		$	1,186.5			(6.1	)%		(2.4	)%
Segment operating income	$	104.0		$	136.3		$	119.4			(23.7	)%		14.2	%
Segment profit margin %		9.6	%		11.8	%		10.1	%

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Constant currency growth
28.2 % 10.9 %
Currency
1.7 % (6.6 )%
Total
29.9 % 4.3 %

The following tables provide details of Engineering Adhesives net revenue variances:

~~Table of Contents~~

	2020 vs 2019			2019 vs 2018
Organic growth		(5.5	)%		1.2	%
Currency		(0.6	)%		(3.6	)%
Total		(6.1	)%		(2.4	)%

Net revenue ~~increased 29.9~~decreased 6.1 percent in ~~2018~~2020 compared to ~~2017.~~2019. The ~~28.2~~5.5 percent ~~increase~~decrease in ~~constant currency~~organic growth was attributable to ~~a 23.4 percent increase in~~lower sales volume ~~including a 24.3 percent increase due to the Royal acquisition, a 4.4 percent increase in~~and product ~~pricing and a 0.4 percent increase in sales mix.~~pricing. The ~~1.7 percent positive~~negative currency effect was ~~primarily the result of~~due to a weaker Brazilian real, Turkish lira and Argentinian peso partially offset by a stronger Euro ~~and British pound offset by a weaker Turkish lira and Indian rupee~~ compared to the U.S. dollar. Raw material costs as a percentage of net revenue increased 2030 basis points. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue ~~decreased 40~~increased 130 basis points ~~in 2018 compared~~due to ~~2017. Operating~~lower net revenue. SG&A expense as a percentage of net revenue ~~decreased 190~~increased 60 basis points due to lower ~~restructuring plan costs.~~net revenue. Segment operating income ~~increased 113.3~~decreased 23.7 percent and segment operating margin ~~as a percentage of net revenue increased 210~~decreased 220 basis points ~~in 2018~~ compared to ~~2017.~~2019.

Net revenue ~~increased 4.3~~decreased 2.4 percent in ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~2016.~~2018. The ~~10.9~~1.2 percent increase in ~~constant currency~~organic growth was attributable to ~~a 6.3 percent~~an increase in sales volume, ~~including a 3.7 percent increase due to the Royal Adhesives acquisition, a 4.5 percent increase in~~partially offset by decreased product ~~pricing and a 0.1 percent increase due to favorable sales mix.~~pricing. Sales volume growth was primarily ~~related to the hygiene and durable assembly markets. In addition, we had~~driven by strong ~~growth~~performance in the ~~emerging~~electronics and new energy markets. The ~~6.6 percent~~ negative currency effect was ~~primarily the result of~~due to a weaker ~~Egyptian pound~~Chinese renminbi and ~~Turkish lira offset by a stronger~~ Euro ~~and Indian rupee~~ compared to the U.S. dollar. Raw material costs as a percentage of net revenue ~~increased 250~~decreased 260 basis points ~~primarily~~ due to ~~higher~~favorable product mix and lower raw material ~~costs and the impact of the Royal Adhesives acquisition offset by higher product pricing.~~costs. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue ~~was flat in 2017 compared~~increased 90 basis points due to ~~2016. Operating~~higher production and integration costs. SG&A expense as a percentage of net revenue ~~increased 160 basis points due to the acquisition of Royal Adhesives.~~was flat. Segment operating income ~~decreased 53.1~~increased 14.2 percent and segment operating margin ~~decreased 410~~increased 170 basis points compared to ~~2016.~~2018.

Asia Pacific

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Net revenue
$ 278.1 $ 264.7 $ 241.8 5.1 % 9.5 %
Segment operating income
$ 18.0 $ 14.8 $ 15.4 21.6 % (3.9 )%
Segment profit margin %
6.5 % 5.6 % 6.4 %

Construction Adhesives

The following table provides details of Asia Pacific net revenue variances:

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Constant currency growth
3.3 % 11.1 %
Currency
1.8 % (1.6 )%
Total
5.1 % 9.5 %

($ in millions)	2020			2019			2018			2020 vs 2019			2019 vs 2018
Net revenue	$	369.2		$	396.6		$	454.2			(6.9	)%		(12.7	)%
Segment operating income (loss)	$	11.1		$	16.6		$	39.1			(33.1	)%		(57.5	)%
Segment profit margin %		3.0	%		4.2	%		8.6	%

The following tables provide details of Construction Adhesives net revenue variances:

	2020 vs 2019			2019 vs 2018
Organic growth		(6.7	)%		(12.0	)%
Currency		(0.2	)%		(0.7	)%
Total		(6.9	)%		(12.7	)%

Net revenue decreased 6.9 percent in ~~2018 increased 5.1 percent~~2020 compared to ~~2017.~~2019. The ~~3.3~~6.7 percent ~~increase~~decrease in ~~constant currency~~organic growth was attributable to ~~a 2.4 percent increase in~~lower sales volume ~~including a 1.5 percent increase~~and product pricing. The negative currency effect was due to the Royal Adhesives acquisition, and a 1.4 percent increase in product pricing, partially offset by a 0.5 decrease due to unfavorable sales mix. Positive currency effects of 1.8 percent compared to 2017 were primarily driven by the stronger Chinese renminbi and Malaysian ringgit offset by the weaker Australian dollar ~~and Indonesian rupiah~~ compared to the U.S. dollar. Raw material costs as a percentage of net revenue decreased 60 basis points ~~compared to 2017~~ primarily due to ~~an increase in product pricing.~~lower raw material costs. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue ~~decreased 50~~increased 160 basis points ~~compared~~primarily due to ~~2017. Operating expense~~lower net revenue. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue increased 20 basis points. Segment operating income ~~increased 21.6 percent and segment operating margin increased 90 basis points compared to 2017.~~

Net revenue in 2017 increased 9.5 percent compared to 2016. The 11.1 percent increase in constant currency growth was attributable to a 12.1 percent increase in sales volume, including a 3.0 percent increase due to the Advanced Adhesives and Royal Adhesives acquisitions, partially offset by a 0.5 percent decrease in product pricing and a 0.5 percent decrease due to unfavorable sales mix. Constant currency growth was primarily driven by volume growth in Greater China. Negative currency effects of 1.6 percent compared to 2016 were primarily driven by the weaker Chinese renminbi and Malaysian ringgit compared to the U.S. dollar, partially offset by a stronger Australian dollar. Raw material costs as a percentage of net revenue increased 180 basis points compared to 2016, primarily due to higher raw material costs. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue decreased ~~60 basis points compared to 2016. Operating expense as a percentage of net revenue decreased 40 basis points. Segment operating income decreased 3.9~~33.1 percent and segment operating margin decreased 80120 basis points compared to ~~2016.~~2019.

Table of Contents

Construction Adhesives

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Net revenue
$ 446.1 $ 260.3 $ 256.4 71.4 % 1.5 %
Segment operating income (loss)
$ 32.9 $ (13.0 ) $ 3.3

NMP

(493.9 )%
Segment profit margin %
7.4 % (5.0 )% 1.3 %

~~NMP = Non-meaningful percentage~~

The following tables provide details of Construction Adhesives net revenue variances:

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Constant currency growth
71.2 % 1.3 %
Currency
0.2 % 0.2 %
Total
71.4 % 1.5 %

Net revenue ~~increased 71.4~~decreased 12.7 percent in ~~2018~~2019 compared to ~~2017.~~2018. The ~~71.2~~12.0 percent ~~increase~~decrease in ~~constant currency~~organic growth was ~~driven by a 72.2 percent increase in~~attributable to lower sales volume ~~including a 72.4 percent increase due to the Royal Adhesives acquisition,~~ partially offset by ~~a 1.0 percent decrease due to unfavorable sales mix.~~increased product pricing. The ~~positive~~negative currency effect ~~of 0.2 percent compared to 2017~~ was due to the ~~stronger Euro~~weaker Australian dollar and ~~Australian~~Canadian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar. Raw material costs as a percentage of net revenue ~~was flat compared to 2017. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue were 680~~decreased 80 basis points ~~lower in 2018 compared to 2017~~ primarily due to improved operating efficiencies related to the completion of the facility upgrade and expansion project and lower restructuring plan costs. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased by 560 basis points in 2018 compared to 2017 due to increased sales volume.

Net revenue increased 1.5 percent in 2017 compared to 2016. The 1.3 percent increase in constant currency growth was driven by a 1.6 percent increase in sales volume, including an 8.5 percent increase due to the Royal Adhesives acquisition, offset by a 6.9 percent decrease in sales volume and a 0.3 percent decrease due to unfavorable sales mix. The sales volume decline was due to lower service levels related to the facility upgrade and expansion project. Positive currency effects of 0.2 percent compared to 2016 were primarily driven by the stronger Australian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar. Raw material cost as a percentage of net revenue was 30 basis points higher in 2017 compared to 2016. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue were 180 basis points higher in 2017 compared to 2016 due to inefficiencies related to the facility upgrade and expansion project. Operating expense as a percentage of net revenue increased 420 basis points due to the impact of the Royal Adhesives acquisition. Segment operating income (loss) decreased 493.9 percent and segment profit margin decreased 630 basis points in 2017 compared to 2016.

Engineering Adhesives

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Net revenue
$ 478.4 $ 304.6 $ 245.2 57.1 % 24.2 %
Segment operating income
$ 48.4 $ 16.2 $ 17.4

198.8 % (6.9 )%
Segment profit margin %
10.1 % 5.3 % 7.1 %

The following tables provide details of Engineering Adhesives net revenue variances:

2018 vs 2017

2017 vs 2016

Constant currency growth
54.6 % 26.0 %
Currency
2.5 % (1.8 )%
Total
57.1 % 24.2 %

Net revenue increased 57.1 percent in 2018 compared to 2017. The 54.6 percent increase in constant currency growth was driven by a 49.1 percent increase in sales volume, including a 39.9 percent increase due to the acquisition of Royal Adhesives, a 4.8 percent increase in product pricing and a 0.7 percent increase due to favorable sales mix. Sales volume growth was primarily driven by strong performance in the Tonsan and automotive markets. Positive currency effects of 2.5 percent were primarily driven by the stronger Chinese renminbi, Euro and British pound offset by the weaker Turkish lira and Brazilian real compared to the U.S. dollar. Raw material costs as a percentage of net revenue were 260 basis points lower in 2018 compared to 2017 due to increased product pricing and ~~the impact of the Royal Adhesives acquisition partially offset by higher~~lower raw material costs. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue ~~were 280~~increased 300 basis points ~~higher in 2018 compared to 2017 due to the impact of the Royal Adhesives acquisition. Operating expense as a percentage of net revenue decreased 500 basis points compared to 2017~~ primarily due to higher production costs, the impact of lower sales volume and ~~the impact of the Royal Adhesives acquisition. Segment operating income increased 198.8 percent~~higher manufacturing waste and ~~segment operating margin increased 480 basis points in 2018 compared to 2017.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Net revenue increased 24.2 percent in 2017 compared to 2016. The 26.0 percent increase in constant currency growth was driven by a 27.7 percent increase in sales volume, including a 9.5 percent increase due to the acquisitions of Cyberbond, L.L.C. and Royal Adhesives, partially offset by a 1.2 percent decrease in product pricing and a 0.5 percent decrease due to unfavorable sales mix. Constant currency growth was driven by strong performance in the electronics and Tonsan markets. Negative currency effects of 1.8 percent compared to 2016 were primarily driven by the weaker Chinese renminbi partially offset by a stronger Euro and Indian rupee compared to the U.S. dollar. Raw material costscrap costs. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue increased ~~160~~220 basis points ~~in 2017 compared to 2016~~ due to ~~unfavorable~~lower sales mix, higher raw material costs and the impact of the Royal Adhesives acquisition. Other manufacturing costs as a percentage of net revenue decreased 30 basis points in 2017 compared to 2016. Operating expense as a percentage of net revenue increased 50 basis points compared to 2016 due to the impact of acquisitions, partially offset by the net mark to market adjustment related to the Tonsan contingent consideration liability.volume. Segment operating income decreased ~~6.9~~57.5 percent and segment operating margin decreased ~~180~~440 basis points ~~in 2017~~ compared to ~~2016.~~2018.

Corporate Unallocated

($ in millions)	2020			2019			2018			2020 vs 2019			2019 vs 2018
Net revenue	$	-		$	13.7		$	24.7			(100.0	)%		(44.5	)%
Segment operating loss	$	(27.6	)	$	(42.9	)	$	(41.1	)		(35.7	)%		4.4	%
Segment profit margin %	NMP				(313.1	)%		(166.4	)%

NMP = Non-meaningful percentage

Corporate Unallocated includes acquisition and integration-related charges, restructuring-related charges, the results of business divestitures and costs related to the implementation of Project ONE.

Net revenue in Corporate Unallocated for 2019 and 2018 included revenue from our surfactants and thickeners business that was divested during the third quarter of 2019. Segment operating loss decreased 35.7 percent in 2020 reflecting decreased organizational realignment costs compared to 2019. Segment operating loss increased 4.4 percent in 2019 reflecting increased organizational realignment costs compared to 2018.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total cash and cash equivalents as of ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 were ~~$150.8~~$100.5 million compared to ~~$194.4~~$112.2 million as of ~~December 2, 2017.~~November 30, 2019. Total long and short-term debt was ~~$2,247.5~~$1,773.9 million as of ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 and ~~$2,451.9~~$1,979.1 million as of ~~December 2, 2017.~~November 30, 2019.

We believe that cash flows from operating activities will be adequate to meet our ongoing liquidity and capital expenditure needs. In addition, we believe we have the ability to obtain both short-term and long-term debt to meet our financing needs for the foreseeable future. Cash available in the United States has historically been sufficient and we expect it will continue to be sufficient to fund U.S. operations, ~~and~~ U.S. capital spending and U.S. pension and other postretirement benefit contributions in addition to funding U.S. acquisitions, dividend payments, debt service and share repurchases as needed. For those international earnings considered to be reinvested indefinitely, we currently have no intention to, and plans do not indicate a need to, repatriate these funds for U.S. operations.

Our credit agreements include restrictive covenants that, if not met, could lead to a renegotiation of our credit lines and a significant increase in our cost of financing. At ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, we were in compliance with all covenants of our contractual obligations as shown in the following table:

Covenant	Debt Instrument	Measurement	Result as of ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020
Total Indebtedness / TTM EBITDA	~~Revolving Credit Agreement and~~ Term Loan B Credit Agreement	Not greater than 5.9	~~4.3~~2.9
Total Indebtedness / TTM EBITDA	Revolving Credit Agreement	Not greater than 5.9	2.8
TTM EBITDA / Consolidated Interest Expense	Revolving Credit Agreement	Not less than 2.0	4.7

●

TTM = trailing 12 months

	●	EBITDA for Term Loan B covenant purposes is defined as consolidated net income, plus interest expense, expense for taxes paid or accrued, depreciation and amortization, certain non-cash impairment losses, extraordinary non-cash losses incurred other than in the ordinary course of business, nonrecurring extraordinary non-cash restructuring charges and the non-cash impact of purchase accounting, expenses related to the Royal Adhesives acquisition not to exceed $40.0 million, one-time costs incurred in connection with prepayment premiums and make-whole amounts under certain agreements, certain “run rate” cost savings and synergies in connection with the Royal Adhesives acquisition not to exceed 15% of Consolidated EBITDA, expenses relating to the integration of Royal Adhesives during the fiscal years ending in 2017, 2018 and 2019 not exceeding $30 million in aggregate, restructuring expenses that began prior to the Royal Adhesives acquisition incurred in fiscal years ending in 2017 and 2018 not exceeding $28 million in aggregate, and non-capitalized charges relating to the SAP implementation during fiscal years ending in 2017 through 2021 not exceeding $13 million in any single fiscal year, minus extraordinary non-cash gains. For the Total Indebtedness / TTM EBITDA ratio, TTM EBITDA is adjusted for the pro forma results from Material Acquisitions and Material Divestitures as if the acquisition or divestiture occurred at the beginning of the calculation period. The full definition is set forth in the Term Loan B Credit Agreement and ~~the Amended Revolving Credit Agreement, and~~ can be found in the Company’s 8-K ~~filings~~filing dated October 20, ~~2017 and November 17, 2017, respectively.~~2017.

	●	EBITDA for Revolving Credit Facility covenant purposes is defined as consolidated net income, plus interest expense, expense for taxes paid or accrued, depreciation and amortization, non-cash impairment losses related to long-lived assets, intangible assets or goodwill, nonrecurring or unusual non-cash losses incurred other than in the ordinary course of business, nonrecurring or unusual non-cash restructuring charges and the non-cash impact of purchase accounting, fees, premiums, expenses and other transaction costs incurred or paid by the borrower or any of its Subsidiaries on the effective date in connection with the transactions, this agreement and the other loan documents, the 2020 supplemental indenture and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, one-time, non-capitalized charges and expenses relating to the Company’s SAP implementation during fiscal years ending in 2017 through 2024, in an amount not exceeding $15.0 million in any single fiscal year of the Company, charges and expenses relating to the ASP Royal Acquisition, including but not limited to advisory and financing costs, during the Company’s fiscal years ending in 2020 and 2021, in an aggregate amount (as to such years combined) not exceeding $40.0 million, charges and expenses related to the reorganization of the Company and its subsidiaries from five business units to three business units to reduce costs during the Company’s fiscal years ending in 2020 and 2021 in an aggregate amount (as to such years combined) not exceeding $24.0 million, and charges and expenses related to the Company’s manufacturing and operations project to improve delivery, implement cost savings and reduce inventory during the Company’s fiscal years ending in 2020, 2021 and 2022 in an aggregate amount (as to such years combined) not exceeding $15.5 million.

	●	Consolidated Interest Expense for the Revolving Credit Facility is defined as the interest expense (including without limitation the portion of capital lease obligations that constitutes imputed interest in accordance with GAAP) of the Company and its subsidiaries calculated on a consolidated basis for such period with respect to all outstanding indebtedness of the Company and its subsidiaries allocable to such period in accordance with GAAP.

Table of Contents

We believe we have the ability to meet all of our contractual obligations and commitments in fiscal ~~2019.~~ 2021.

Net Financial Assets (Liabilities)

($ in millions)

2018

2017

Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
$ 150.8 $ 194.4
Foreign exchange contracts
4.9 0.6
Cash flow hedges
0.7 -
Interest rate swaps
28.9 3.1
Financial Liabilities:

Notes payable
(14.8 ) (31.5 )
Long-term debt
(2,232.8 ) (2,420.4 )
Foreign exchange contracts
(2.2 ) (4.4 )
Fair value hedges
(8.7 ) (2.1)
Cash flow hedges
- (20.1 )
Net financial liabilities
$ (2,073.2 ) $ (2,280.4 )

Net Financial Assets (Liabilities)

($ in millions)	2020			2019
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	100.5		$	112.2
Foreign exchange contracts		2.3			1.2
Cash flow hedges		2.5			26.9
Fair value hedges		-			5.7
Financial liabilities:
Notes payable		(16.9	)		(15.7	)
Long-term debt		(1,757.0	)		(1,963.4	)
Foreign exchange contracts		(5.3	)		(1.8	)
Interest rate swaps		(33.3	)		(17.6	)
Net financial liabilities	$	(1,706.9	)	$	(1,852.5	)

Of the ~~$150.8~~$100.5 million in cash and cash equivalents as of ~~December 1, 2018, $145.2~~November 28, 2020, $82.6 million was held outside the U.S. Of the ~~$145.2~~$82.6 million of cash held outside the U.S., earnings on ~~$137.8~~$77.3 million are indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. It is not practical for us to determine the U.S. tax implications of the repatriation of these funds.

There are no contractual or regulatory restrictions on the ability of consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries to transfer funds in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances to us, except for: 1) a credit facility limitation restricting investments, loans, advances or capital contributions from Loan Parties to non-Loan Parties in excess of $100.0 million, 2) a credit facility limitation that provides total investments, loans, advances or guarantees not otherwise permitted in the credit agreement for all subsidiaries shall not exceed $125.0 million in the aggregate, 3) a credit facility limitation that provides total investments, dividends, and distributions shall not exceed the Available Amount defined in these agreements, all three of which do not apply once our secured leverage ratio drops below 4.0x and 4) typical statutory restrictions, which prohibit distributions in excess of net capital or similar tests. The Royal Adhesives acquisition and any investments, loans, and advances established to consummate the Royal Adhesives acquisition, are excluded from the credit facility limitations described above. Additionally, we have taken the income tax position that the majority of our cash in non-U.S. locations is indefinitely reinvested.

Debt Outstanding and Debt Capacity

Notes Payable

Notes payable were ~~$14.8~~$16.9 million at ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 and ~~$31.5~~$15.7 million at ~~December 2, 2017.~~November 30, 2019. These amounts ~~mainly~~primarily represented various foreign subsidiaries’ short-term borrowings that were not part of committed lines. The weighted-average interest rates on these short-term borrowings were ~~9.6~~8.1 percent in ~~2018~~2020 and ~~11.0~~8.9 percent in ~~2017.~~2019.

Table of Contents

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of a secured term loan (“Term Loan B”) and antwo unsecured public ~~note~~notes (“Public Notes”). The Term Loan B has a principal amount of $1,157.7 million and bears a floating interest rate at LIBOR plus 2.00 percent ~~(4.30~~(2.15 percent at ~~December 1, 2018)~~November 28, 2020) and matures in fiscal year 2024. The 10-year Public Notes have a principal amount of $300.0 million, bear fixed interest at 4.00 percent ~~fixed interest~~ and mature in ~~fiscal year~~ 2027. We are subject to a par call of 1.00 percent except within three months of the maturity date. The 8-year Public Notes have a principal amount of $300.0 million, bear fixed interest at 4.25 percent and mature in 2028. We are subject to a par call plus 50 percent of coupon in year 4, plus 25 percent of coupon in year 5 and at par thereafter. We currently have no intention to prepay the Public Notes. Additional details on the Public Notes and the Term Loan B Credit Agreement can be found in ~~the~~Form 8-K dated February 9, 2017 ~~and the~~, Form 8-K dated October 20, 2017 and Form 8-K dated October 20, 2020, respectively.

~~Table of Contents~~

We executed interest rate swap agreements for the purpose of obtaining a fixed interest rate on ~~$1,450.0~~$1,125.0 million of the $2,150.0 million Term Loan B. We have designated forecasted interest payments resulting from the variability of 1-month LIBOR in relation to ~~$1,450.0~~$1,125.0 million of the Term Loan B as the hedged item in cash flow hedges. The combined fair value of the interest rate swaps in total was ~~an asset~~a liability of ~~$28.9~~$33.3 million at ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 and was included in other ~~assets~~liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We are applying the hypothetical derivative method to assess hedge effectiveness for these interest rate swaps. Changes in the fair value of a hypothetically perfect swap with terms that match the critical terms of our ~~$1,450.0~~$1,125.0 million variable rate Term Loan B are compared with the change in the fair value of the swaps.

We entered into interest rate swap agreements ~~for the purpose of obtaining a floating rate on~~to convert $150.0 million of our $300.0 million Public ~~Notes. We have designated the $150.0 million of public debt as the hedged item in~~Notes that were issued on February 14, 2017 to a ~~fair value hedge. The combined fair value of the~~variable interest rate ~~swaps in total was a liability~~ of ~~$8.7 million at December 1, 2018 and was included in other liabilities in~~1-month LIBOR plus 1.86 percent. See Note 7 to the Consolidated ~~Balance Sheets.~~Financial Statements for further discussion on the issuance of our Public Notes. The swaps were designated for hedge accounting treatment as fair value hedges. We ~~are applying~~applied the hypothetical derivative method to assess hedge effectiveness for ~~these~~this interest rate ~~swaps.~~swap. Changes in the fair value of a hypothetically perfect swap with terms that match the critical terms of our $150.0 million fixed rate Public Notes are compared with the change in the fair value of the swaps. On May 1, 2020, we terminated the swap agreement. Upon termination, we received $15.8 million in cash. The remaining swap liability will be accounted for as a discount on long-term debt and will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the Public Notes of seven years.

Lines of Credit

We have a revolving credit agreement with a consortium of financial institutions at ~~December 1, 2018.~~November 28, 2020. This credit agreement creates a secured multi-currency revolving credit facility that we can draw upon to repay existing indebtedness, finance working capital needs, finance acquisitions, and for general corporate purposes up to a maximum of $400.0 million. Interest on the revolving credit facility is payable at LIBOR plus 2.00 percent ~~(4.35~~(2.15 percent at ~~December 1, 2018)~~November 28, 2020). A facility fee of ~~0.30~~0.25 percent of the unused commitment under the revolving credit facility is payable quarterly. The interest rate and the facility fee are based on a leverage grid. The credit facility expires on ~~April 12, 2022.~~July 22, 2024. As of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, our lines of credit were undrawn. Additional details on the revolving credit agreement can be found in ~~the~~Form 8-K dated ~~November 17, 2017.~~October 20, 2020. For further information related to debt outstanding and debt capacity, see Note 67 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR phase out at the end of 2021 may adversely impact the value of, and our obligations under, our Term Loan B, Public Notes and revolving credit facility. See the applicable discussion under Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

As of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, goodwill totaled ~~$1,305.2~~$1,312.0 million ~~(31~~(33 percent of total assets) and other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, totaled ~~$ 908.2~~$756.0 million ~~(22~~(19 percent of total assets).

The components of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets, net of amortization, by segment at ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 are as follows:

													2020

													Hygiene, Health
	Americas				Asia		Construction		Engineering				and Consumable		Engineering		Construction
($ in millions)	Adhesives		EIMEA		Pacific		Adhesives		Adhesives		Total		Adhesives		Adhesives		Adhesives		Total
Goodwill	$	370.4	$	184.7	$	21.4	$	309.9	$	418.7	$	1,305.2	$	332.9	$	667.9	$	311.2	$	1,312.0
Purchased technology & patents	20.2			18.5		0.9		18.3		19.5		77.4
Purchased technology and patents														9.1		40.2		11.2		60.5
Customer relationships		250.9		77.0		9.1		288.4		153.2		778.6		120.0		276.7		257.7		654.4
Tradenames		12.7		4.2		-		12.2		15.3		44.4		5.3		18.7		9.9		33.9
Other finite-lived intangible assets		-		4.9		1.5		0.4		0.4		7.2		2.8		0.3		3.5		6.6
Indefinite-lived intangible assets		-		0.5		-		-		-		0.5		-		0.5		-		0.5

Table of Contents

	2019

	Hygiene, Health
	and Consumable		Engineering		Construction
($ in millions)	Adhesives		Adhesives		Adhesives		Total
Goodwill	$	321.3	$	649.5	$	311.0	$	1,281.8
Purchased technology and patents		11.1		43.2		12.3		66.6
Customer relationships		120.5		290.5		279.4		690.4
Tradenames		6.1		20.1		11.5		37.7
Other finite-lived intangible assets		3.5		0.6		0.1		4.2
Indefinite-lived intangible assets		-		0.5		-		0.5

Selected Metrics of Liquidity and Capital Resources

Key metrics we monitor are net working capital as a percent of annualized net revenue, trade ~~accounts receivable~~receivables days sales outstanding (DSO), inventory days on hand, free cash flow after dividends and debt capitalization ratio.

	December 1,		December 2,		November 28,			November 30,
	2018		2017		2020			2019
Net working capital as a percentage of annualized net revenue¹		18.5%		21.3%		16.8	%		18.0	%
Accounts receivable DSO (in days)²		56		61
Trade receivables DSO (in days)²						59			59
Inventory days on hand (in days)³		60		59		53			58
Free cash flow after dividends⁴		$153.9		$56.3	$	210.8		$	174.8
Debt capitalization ratio⁵		66.1%		70.0%		56.1	%		61.8	%

¹Current quarter net working capital (trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts plus inventory minus trade payables) divided by annualized net revenue (current quarter, multiplied by 4).

²Trade receivables net of allowance for doubtful accounts multiplied by 56 (8 weeks) and divided by the net revenue for the last 2 months of the quarter.

³Total inventory multiplied by 56 and divided by cost of sales (excluding delivery costs) for the last 2 months of the quarter.

⁴ Net cash provided by operations less purchased property, plant and equipment and dividends paid. See reconciliation to Net cash provided by operating activities below.

⁵ Total debt divided by (total debt plus total stockholders’ equity).

Free cash flow after dividends, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less purchased property, plant and equipment and dividends paid. Free cash flow after dividends is an integral financial measure used by the Company to assess its ability to generate cash in excess of its operating needs, therefore, the Company believes this financial measure provides useful information to investors. The following table reflects the manner in which free cash flow after dividends is determined and provides a reconciliation of free cash flow after dividends to net cash provided by operating activities, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Reconciliation of “Net cash provided by operating activities” to "Free cash flow after dividends"

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Net cash provided by operating activities
$ 253.3 $ 140.8 $ 195.7
Less: Purchased property, plant and equipment
68.3 54.9 63.3
Less: Dividends paid
31.1 29.6 27.5
Free cash flow after dividends
$ 153.9 $ 56.3 $ 104.9

Table of Contents

Summary of Cash Flows

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Net cash provided by operating activities
$ 253.3 $ 140.8 $ 195.7

Reconciliation of “Net cash provided by operating activities” to "Free cash flow after dividends"

($ in millions)	2020		2019		2018
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	331.6	$	269.2	$	253.3
Less: Purchased property, plant and equipment		87.3		62.0		68.3
Less: Dividends paid		33.5		32.4		31.1
Free cash flow after dividends	$	210.8	$	174.8	$	153.9

Summary of Cash Flows

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

($ in millions)		2020				2019				2018
Net cash provided by operating activities		$	331.6			$	269.2			$	253.3

Net income including non-controlling interest was $123.8 million in 2020, $130.8 million in 2019 and $171.2 million in ~~2018, $59.5 million in 2017 and $121.9 million in 2016.~~2018. Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $138.8 million in 2020 compared to $141.2 million in 2019 and $145.1 million in ~~2018 compared to $87.3 million in 2017 and $77.7 million in 2016. The higher depreciation~~2018. Depreciation and amortization expense in 2020, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017 was directly related to the intangible~~reflect assets acquired in our business acquisitions.

~~Table of Contents~~

Changes in net working capital (trade receivables, inventory and trade payables) accounted for a ~~use~~source of cash of ~~$31.1~~$24.0 million, a source of cash of ~~$8.9~~$5.5 million and a use of cash of ~~$17.9~~$31.1 million in ~~2018, 2017~~2020, 2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. Following is an assessment of each of the net working capital components:

●

Trade Receivables, net – Changes in trade receivables resulted in a $14.8 million use of cash in 2020 compared to a $25.6 million and $39.4 million use of cash in 2019 and 2018, ~~compared to $26.8 million~~respectively. The lower use of cash in ~~2017 and $1.9 million source of cash in 2016.~~2020 compared to 2019 was related to lower net revenue compared to the prior year. The lower use of cash in ~~2018~~2019 was related to ~~higher~~lower net revenue and ~~an increase in~~lower trade receivables compared to ~~2017. The use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 was related to higher net revenue compared to 2016.~~2018. The DSO was 59 days at November 28, 2020 and November 30, 2019 and 56 days at December 1, ~~2018, 61 days at December 2, 2017 and 57 days at December 3, 2016.~~2018.

●

Inventory – Changes in inventory resulted in a $15.7 million source of cash in 2020 compared to a $19.6 million source of cash and a $17.1 million use of cash in 2019 and 2018, ~~compared to an $8.7 million use~~respectively. The lower source of cash in ~~2017 and a $7.5 million use of cash of in 2016. In 2018 and 2017, inventory levels increased~~2020 compared to 2019 was due to higher ~~raw material costs and~~decreasing inventory levels in 2019 compared to ~~maintain service levels while integrating our acquisitions.~~2020. Inventory days on hand were 6053 days at the end of ~~2018~~2020 compared to 5958 days at the end of ~~2017~~2019 and 60 days at the end of ~~2016.~~2018.

●

Trade Payables – Changes in trade payables resulted in a $23.1 million, $11.5 million and $25.4 million source of cash in 2020, 2019 and 2018, ~~compared to a $44.4 million source of cash in 2017 and a $12.3 million use of cash in 2016. Both comparisons~~respectively. Changes between all years were primarily related to the timing of ~~payments.~~payments, and extension of payment terms globally.

Contributions to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans were ~~$6.6~~$5.5 million, ~~$4.7~~$8.1 million and $6.6 million in ~~2018, 2017~~2020, 2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. Income taxes payable resulted in a $5.5 million, $21.0 million and $4.0 million source of cash in ~~2018~~2020, 2019 and ~~a $15.0 million and $1.7 million use of cash in 2017 and 2016,~~2018, respectively. Other assets resulted in a $38.4 million source of cash and an $18.3 million and $35.2 million use of cash in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Accrued compensation was a ~~$13.0~~$2.5 million ~~use~~and $1.3 million source of cash in ~~2017~~2020 and ~~an $8.4 million use of cash 2016, respectively. Accrued compensation was~~2019, respectively, and a $0.3 million use of cash in ~~2018 and a $12.2 million and $0.9 million~~2018. The source of cash in ~~2017~~2020 and ~~2016, respectively. The~~2019 relates to higher accruals for our employee incentive plans while the use of cash in 2018 relates to lower ~~accruals for our employee incentive plans and the source of cash in 2017 relates to higher accruals for our employee incentive plans.~~accruals. Other operating activity was a ~~$78.5~~$0.9 million use of cash in 2020 and a $37.5 million and an $81.5 million source of cash in ~~2018 an $11.1 million use of cash in 2017~~2019 and ~~a $34.4 million source of cash in and 2016,~~2018, respectively. This reflects the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar on certain foreign transactions in ~~2018, 2017~~2019 and ~~2016.~~2018.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Net cash used in investing activities
$ (61.8 ) $ (1,800.9 ) $ (111.5 )

Table of Contents

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

($ in millions)		2020				2019				2018
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		$	(109.5	)		$	7.4			$	(61.8	)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment were $87.3 million in 2020 compared to $62.0 million in 2019 and $68.3 million in ~~2018 compared to $54.9 million in 2017 and $63.3 million in 2016.~~2018. The ~~increase in 2018 relates to~~ higher purchases ~~due~~in 2020 reflect the timing of capital projects and expenditures related to ~~our acquisitions in 2017. In 2016, purchases~~growth initiatives. Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment ~~included expenditures~~were $1.5 million in 2020 compared to $11.1 million in 2019 and $2.9 million in 2018. The higher proceeds in 2019 were due to the sale of certain properties.

In 2020, we acquired D.H.M Adhesives, Inc. for $9.5 million and also purchased other business assets for $5.6 million. In 2019, we acquired Ramapo Sales and Marketing, Inc. for $8.3 million and paid a $9.9 million contingent consideration payment for our 2015 acquisition of Tonsan Adhesive, Inc. In 2019, we also received $70.3 million of cash related to the sale of our surfactants and thickeners business. In addition, we received payment of a ~~new~~government grant and expended cash related to the building of a plant in ~~Indonesia~~China of $8.9 million and ~~the Construction Adhesives expansion project.~~

$2.8 million, respectively. In 2018, we received $3.5 million of cash resulting in an adjustment to the purchase price of Royal Adhesives and Adecol. In 2017, we acquired Adecol for $44.7 million, net of cash acquired, Royal Adhesives for $1,622.7 million, net of cash acquired and Wisdom for $123.5 million, net of cash acquired. In 2016, we acquired Cyberbond, L.L.C. for $42.2 million, net of cash acquired and Advanced Adhesives for $10.4 million, net of cash acquired. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on acquisitions.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

($ in millions)

2018

2017

2016

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
$ (228.6 ) $ 1,710.2 $ (52.6 )

($ in millions)		2020				2019				2018
Net cash used in financing activities		$	(239.2	)		$	(315.0	)		$	(288.6	)

In 2020, 2019, and 2018 we ~~had $185.8~~repaid $518.0, $288.6 million ~~of repayments~~and 185.8 million of long-term debt, and no proceeds from long-term debt borrowing. In 2017, we repaid $1,079.3 million and borrowed $2,856.3 million of debt in conjunction with our acquisition of Royal Adhesives and we paid $24.2 million of debt issuance costs. In 2016, there was $22.5 million of repayments of long-term debt and no proceeds from long-term debt borrowing.respectively. See Note ~~6 of~~7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of debt borrowings and repayments.

~~Table of Contents~~

Cash paid for dividends were $33.5 million, $32.4 million and $31.1 million ~~$29.6 million~~in 2020, 2019 and ~~$27.5 million in~~ 2018, ~~2017 and 2016,~~ respectively. Cash generated from the exercise of stock options ~~were~~was $12.3 million, $10.9 million and $6.2 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, ~~$17.7 million in 2017 and $11.3 million in 2016.~~respectively. Repurchases of common stock related to statutory minimum tax withholding upon vesting of restricted stock were $3.4 million in 2020 compared to $3.0 million in 2019 and $4.7 million in ~~2018 compared to $21.8 million in 2017 and $23.2 million in 2016, including $19.1 million in 2017 and $20.9 million in 2016 from our share repurchase program.~~2018. There were no repurchases from our share repurchase program in 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Contractual Obligations

Due dates and amounts of contractual obligations follow:

Payments Due by Period

($ in millions)

Total

Less than
1 year

1-3 years

3-5 years

More than
5 years

Long-term debt
$ 2,264.2 $ 91.2 $ 43.0 $ 43.0 $ 2,087.0
Interest payable on long-term debt¹
525.6 60.8 141.7 194.5 128.6
Notes payable
14.8 14.8 - - -
Operating leases
37.2 13.1 13.2 7.5 3.4
Pension contributions²
2.2 2.2 - - -
Financial instrument liabilities³
2.2 2.2 -
Other⁴
13.5 13.5 - - -
Total contractual obligations
$ 2,859.7 $ 197.8 $ 197.9 $ 245.0 $ 2,219.0

Contractual Obligations

Due dates and amounts of contractual obligations are as follows:

	Payments Due by Period
($ in millions)	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Long-term debt	$	1,757.7	$	-	$	-	$	1,157.7	$	600.0
Interest payable on long-term debt¹		322.8		73.2		118.1		75.3		56.3
Notes payable		16.9		16.9		-		-		-
Operating leases		37.9		11.5		13.5		9.0		3.9
Pension contributions²		1.9		1.9		-		-		-
Financial instrument liabilities³		5.3		5.3		-		-		-
Total contractual obligations	$	2,142.5	$	108.8	$	131.6	$	1,242.0	$	660.2

¹ Some of our interest obligations on long-term debt are variable based on LIBOR. Interest payable for the variable portion is estimated based on a forward LIBOR curve.

²Pension contributions are only included for fiscal ~~2019.~~2021. We have not determined our pension funding obligations beyond ~~2019~~2021 and thus, any potential future contributions have been excluded from the table.

³Represents the fair value of our foreign exchange contracts with a payable position to the counterparty as of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, based on fair market values as of that date. Future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future.

⁴~~This amount includes the forward purchase contract~~

Table of ~~$9.9 million and the contingent consideration liability of $3.6 million related to the Tonsan acquisition.~~

Contents

We are subject to mandatory prepayments in the first quarter of each fiscal year equal to 50% of Excess Cash Flow, as defined in the Term Loan B Credit Agreement, of the prior fiscal year less any voluntary prepayments made during that fiscal year. The Excess Cash Flow Percentage (ECF Percentage) shall be reduced to 25% when our Secured Leverage Ratio is below 4.25:1.00 and to 0% when our Secured Leverage Ratio is below 3.75:1.00. The ~~first~~prepayment for the 2020 measurement period ~~is fiscal year 2018 and the first prepayment~~ was satisfied through amounts prepaid during ~~fiscal year 2018.~~2020. We have estimated the ~~2019~~2021 prepayment ~~and is shown in the table above as due in less than one year.~~to be zero.

We expect to make cash outlays in the future related to uncertain tax positions. However, due to the uncertainty of the timing of future cash flows, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective taxing authorities. Accordingly, gross unrecognized tax benefits of ~~$8.4~~$14.6 million as of ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above. For further information related to unrecognized tax benefits see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

We expect ~~2019~~2021 capital expenditures to be approximately ~~$100.0~~$95.0 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no relationships with any unconsolidated, special-purpose entities or financial partnerships established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet financial arrangements.

~~Table of Contents~~

Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by the use of words like "plan," "expect," "aim," "believe," "project," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "will," "should," "could" (including the negative or variations thereof) and other expressions that indicate future events and trends. These plans and expectations are based upon certain underlying assumptions, including those mentioned with the specific statements. Such assumptions are in turn based upon internal estimates and analyses of current market conditions and trends, our plans and strategies, economic conditions and other factors. These plans and expectations and the assumptions underlying them are necessarily subject to risks and uncertainties inherent in projecting future conditions and results. Actual results could differ materially from expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements if one or more of the underlying assumptions and expectations proves to be inaccurate or is unrealized. In addition to the factors described in this report, Item 1A. Risk Factors identifies some of the important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in any such forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, we have identified these important factors which could affect our financial performance and could cause our actual results for future periods to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. These factors should be considered, together with any similar risk factors or other cautionary language that may be made elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The list of important factors in Item 1A. Risk Factors does not necessarily present the risk factors in order of importance. This disclosure, including that under Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors, and other forward-looking statements and related disclosures made by us in this report and elsewhere from time to time, represents our best judgment as of the date the information is given. We do not undertake responsibility for updating any of such information, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. Investors are advised, however, to consult any further public company disclosures (such as in filings with the SEC or in our press releases) on related subjects.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currency rates and prices of raw materials. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Our financial performance may be negatively affected by unfavorable economic conditions. Recessionary economic conditions may have an adverse impact on our sales volumes, pricing levels and profitability. As domestic and international economic conditions change, trends in discretionary consumer spending also become unpredictable and subject to reductions due to uncertainties about the future. A general reduction in consumer discretionary spending due to a recession in the domestic and international economies, or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk

Exposure to changes in interest rates results primarily from borrowing activities used to fund operations. Committed floating rate credit facilities are used to fund a portion of operations. We believe that probable near-term changes in interest rates would not materially affect financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The annual impact on interest expense of a one-percentage point interest rate change on the outstanding balance of our variable rate debt, net of interest rate swap derivatives as of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, would have resulted in a change in net income of approximately ~~$4.7~~$0.4 million or ~~$0.09~~$0.01 per diluted share.

Foreign Exchange Risk

As a result of being a global enterprise, there is exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our operating results and financial condition are subject to both currency translation and currency transaction risk. Approximately 55 percent of net revenue was generated outside of the United States in ~~2018.~~2020. Principal foreign currency exposures relate to the Euro, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Chinese renminbi, Japanese yen, Australian dollar, Argentine peso, Brazilian real, Colombian peso, Mexican peso, Turkish lira, Egyptian pound, Indian rupee, Indonesian rupiah and Malaysian ringgit.

~~Table of Contents~~

We enter into cross border transactions through importing and exporting goods to and from different countries and locations. These transactions generate foreign exchange risk as they create assets, liabilities and cash flows in currencies other than their functional currency. This also applies to services provided and other cross border agreements among subsidiaries. Our objective is to balance, where possible, non-functional currency denominated assets to non-functional currency denominated liabilities to have a natural hedge and minimize foreign exchange impacts.

In the event a natural hedge is not available, we take steps to minimize risks from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations through normal operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative instruments. We do not enter into any speculative positions with regard to derivative instruments.

Based on ~~2018~~2020 financial results, a hypothetical one percent change in our cost of sales due to foreign currency rate changes would have resulted in a change in net income attributable to H.B. Fuller of approximately ~~$8.3~~$7.9 million or ~~$0.16~~$0.15 per diluted share. Based on ~~2018~~2020 financial results and foreign currency balance sheet positions as of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, a hypothetical overall 10 percent change in the U.S. dollar would have resulted in a change in net income of approximately $13.2 million or $0.25 per diluted share.

On December 4, 2016, for our subsidiaries in Latin America, the company changed its functional currency from the U.S. dollar to the entity’s local currency based on management’s analysis of the changes of the economic facts and circumstances in which these subsidiaries operate. The change in functional currency is accounted for prospectively from December 4, 2016 and financial statements prior to and including the year ended December 3, 2016 have not been restated for the change in functional currency.

Raw Materials

The principal raw materials used to manufacture products include resins, polymers, synthetic rubbers, vinyl acetate monomer and plasticizers. We generally avoid sole source supplier arrangements for raw materials. While alternate supplies of most key raw materials are available, unplanned supplier production outages may lead to strained supply-demand situations for several key raw materials such as ethylene and propylene, several polymers and other petroleum derivatives such as waxes.

The purchase of raw materials is our largest expenditure. Our objective is to purchase raw materials that meet both our quality standards and production needs at the lowest total cost. Most raw materials are purchased on the open market or under contracts that limit the frequency but not the magnitude of price increases. In some cases, however, the risk of raw material price changes is managed by strategic sourcing agreements which limit price increases to increases in supplier feedstock costs, while requiring decreases as feedstock costs decline. The leverage of having substitute raw materials approved for use wherever possible is used to minimize the impact of possible price increases. Based on ~~2018~~2020 financial results, a hypothetical one percent change in our raw material costs would have resulted in a change in net income of approximately ~~$12.1~~$11.0 million or ~~$0.23~~$0.21 per diluted share.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information concerning new accounting standards and the impact of the implementation of these standards on our financial statements.

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

~~The~~To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors ~~and Stockholders~~

of H.B. Fuller ~~Company:~~Company

~~Opinions~~Opinion on the ~~Consolidated~~ Financial Statements ~~and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting~~

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheets~~sheet of H.B. Fuller Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of ~~December 1, 2018 and December 2, 2017,~~November 28, 2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, ~~(loss),~~ total equity and cash flows for ~~each of~~ the ~~years in the three-year period~~year ended ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, and the related notes ~~collectively,~~(collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial ~~statements.~~ statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at November 28, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended November 28, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the ~~Company’s~~standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, based on ~~the~~ criteria established in Internal ~~Control – Integrated~~Control-Integrated Framework~~(2013)~~ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ~~(COSO).~~(2013 framework) and our report dated January 26, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

~~In our opinion, the consolidated~~Basis for Opinion

These financial statements ~~referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,~~are the ~~financial position of H.B. Fuller Company as of December 1, 2018 and December 2, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each~~responsibility of the years in the three-year period ended December 1, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, H.B. Fuller Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 1, 2018, based on criteria established in ~~Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)~~ ~~issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.~~

~~Change in Accounting Principle~~

~~As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has elected to change its method of accounting for inventory in 2018.~~

~~Basis for Opinions~~

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report of Internal Controls over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A of the Company’s December 1, 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s ~~consolidated~~ financial statements ~~and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting~~ based on our ~~audits.~~audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the ~~Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)~~PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our ~~audits~~audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the ~~audits~~audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ~~consolidated~~ financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or ~~fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.~~

fraud. Our ~~audits of the consolidated financial statements~~audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the ~~consolidated~~ financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the ~~consolidated~~ financial statements. Our ~~audits~~audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the account or disclosure to which it relates.

Valuation of Goodwill for the Construction Adhesives reporting unit

Description of the Matter

At November 28, 2020, the Company had goodwill of approximately $311 million related to the Construction Adhesive reporting unit. As discussed in Notes 1 and 5 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company performs goodwill impairment testing on an annual basis as of the beginning of the fourth quarter, and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

Auditing management’s goodwill impairment test for the Construction Adhesives reporting unit was complex and judgmental due to the significant estimation required in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. In particular, the Company estimates fair value using the income approach which is sensitive to certain assumptions, such as forecasted revenue and related revenue growth rate, the earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) margins rate, the weighted average cost of capital and the tax rate which are affected by management’s business plans and expectations about future market or economic conditions.

Table of Contents

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company's goodwill impairment review process, including controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions described above.

To test the estimated fair value of the Construction Adhesive reporting unit, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the valuation methodology used by management and testing the significant assumptions discussed above, as well as the underlying data used by the Company in its analysis. For example, we compared the significant assumptions used by management in the prospective financial information to current industry, market and economic trends as well as other relevant factors. We assessed the reasonableness of the forecasted future revenue growth rate and EBITDA margins rate by comparing the forecasts to historical results. We involved our valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of the valuation models, methodologies and significant assumptions used by the Company, specifically the weighted average cost of capital. We compared the projected tax rates with current enacted rates and assessed the reasonableness of the forecasted profits and losses by jurisdiction by comparing to historical results.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.

Minneapolis, Minnesota

January 26, 2021

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of H.B. Fuller Company

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited H.B. Fuller Company and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of November 28, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, H.B. Fuller Company and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 28, 2020, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of November 28, 2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, total equity and cash flows for the year ended November 28, 2020, and the related notes and our report dated January 26, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, ~~and~~ testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed ~~risk. Our audits also included~~risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our ~~audits provide~~audit provides a reasonable basis for our ~~opinions.~~opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

~~Table of Contents~~

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

January 26, 2021

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of H.B. Fuller Company

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of H.B. Fuller Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of November 30, 2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, total equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the two-year period ended November 30, 2019 and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of November 30, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the two-year period ended November 30, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We ~~have~~ served as the Company’s auditor ~~since 2003.~~from 2003 to 2020.

Minneapolis, Minnesota

January ~~28, 2019~~24, 2020

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME~~
H.B. Fuller Company and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

		Fiscal Years										Fiscal Years
		December 1,			December 2,			December 3,				November 28,			November 30,			December 1,
		2018			2017			2016				2020			2019			2018
Net revenue		$	3,041,002		$	2,306,043		$	2,094,605			$	2,790,269		$	2,897,000		$	3,041,002
Cost of sales			(2,204,108	)		(1,700,973	)		(1,488,783	)			(2,033,620	)		(2,090,078	)		(2,212,844	)
Gross profit			836,894			605,070			605,822				756,649			806,922			828,158
Selling, general and administrative expenses			(582,132	)		(477,030	)		(407,638	)			(538,332	)		(580,928	)		(590,267	)
Special charges, net			-			-			168
Other income (expense), net			1,184			(27,667	)		(9,594	)
Other income, net													15,398			37,943			18,055
Interest expense			(110,994	)		(43,701	)		(27,359	)			(86,776	)		(103,287	)		(110,994	)
Interest income			11,774			3,927			2,045				11,417			12,178			11,774
Income before income taxes and income from equity method investments			156,726			60,599			163,444				158,356			172,828			156,726
Income tax benefit (expense)			6,356			(9,810	)		(48,920	)
Income tax (expense) benefit													(41,921	)		(49,408	)		6,356
Income from equity method investments			8,150			8,677			7,393				7,353			7,424			8,150
Net income including non-controlling interests			171,232			59,466			121,917
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests			(24	)		(48	)		(254	)
Net income including non-controlling interest													123,788			130,844			171,232
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest													(69	)		(27	)		(24	)
Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller		$	171,208		$	59,418		$	121,663			$	123,719		$	130,817		$	171,208

Earnings per share attributable to H.B. Fuller common stockholders:	Earnings per share attributable to H.B. Fuller common stockholders:										*Earnings per share attributable to H.B. Fuller common stockholders:*
Basic		$	3.38		$	1.18		$	2.43			$	2.38		$	2.57		$	3.38
Diluted		$	3.29		$	1.15		$	2.37			$	2.36		$	2.52		$	3.29

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic			50,591			50,370			50,136				52,039			50,920			50,591
Diluted			51,975			51,619			51,270				52,520			51,983			51,975

Dividends declared per common share		$	0.615		$	0.590		$	0.550			$	0.648		$	0.635		$	0.615

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)~~
H.B. Fuller Company and Subsidiaries
(In thousands)

	Fiscal Years										Fiscal Years
	December 1,			December 2,			December 3,				November 28,			November 30,			December 1,
	2018			2017			2016				2020			2019			2018
Net income including non-controlling interests	$	171,232		$	59,466		$	121,917
Net income including non-controlling interest											$	123,788		$	130,844		$	171,232
Other comprehensive income (loss)										Other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation		(71,238	)		29,288			(33,855	)			41,742			(20,395	)		(71,238	)
Defined benefit pension plans adjustment, net of tax		(2,970	)		34,930			(1,701	)			4,588			(21,828	)		(2,970	)
Interest rate swaps, net of tax		19,771			1,894			41				(11,765	)		(35,031	)		19,771
Cash flow hedges, net of tax		(6,735	)		(4,047	)		42
Other comprehensive income (income)		(61,172	)		62,065			(35,473	)
Cash-flow hedges, net of tax												6,206			13,820			(6,735	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)												40,771			(63,434	)		(61,172	)
Comprehensive income		110,060			121,531			86,444				164,559			67,410			110,060
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests		8			39			226
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest												99			41			8
Comprehensive income attributable to H.B. Fuller	$	110,052		$	121,492		$	86,218			$	164,460		$	67,369		$	110,052

Table of Contents

Note 1: Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business

H.B. Fuller Company and our subsidiaries formulate, manufacture and market specialty adhesives, sealants, coatings, polymers, tapes, encapsulants, additives and other specialty chemical products globally, with sales operations in 3735 countries in North America, Europe, Latin America, the Asia Pacific region, India, the Middle East and Africa.

~~Our business is reported in~~ As of November 30, 2019, we had five ~~operating~~ reportable segments: Americas Adhesives, EIMEA (Europe, India, Middle East and Africa), Asia Pacific, Construction Adhesives and Engineering Adhesives. As of the beginning of fiscal 2020, we realigned our operating segment structure and now have three reportable segments: Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives, Engineering Adhesives and Construction Adhesives. The change in operating segments is based on how we have organized the company to make operating decisions and assess business performance. Prior period segment information has been recast retrospectively to reflect the realignment. In ~~2018,~~2020, as a percentage of total net revenue by operating segment, ~~Americas~~Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives accounted for 3648 percent, ~~EIMEA 24~~Engineering Adhesives 39 percent ~~Asia Pacific 9 percent,~~and Construction Adhesives ~~15 percent and Engineering Adhesives 16~~13 percent.

Our ~~Americas~~Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives ~~EIMEA~~operating segment produces and ~~Asia Pacific operating segments produce~~supplies a full range of specialty industrial adhesives such as thermoplastic, thermoset, reactive, water-based and ~~supply industrial adhesives~~solvent-based products for applications in various markets, including ~~durable assembly (appliances, filters and insulating glass),~~ packaging (food and beverage containers, flexible packaging, consumer goods, package integrity and re-enforcement, ~~and durable~~ and non-durable goods), converting (corrugation, folding carton, tape and label, paper converting, envelopes, books, multi-wall bags, sacks, and tissue and towel), nonwoven and hygiene (disposable diapers, feminine care and medical garments) and health and beauty.

The Engineering Adhesives operating segment produces and supplies high performance industrial adhesives such as reactive, light cure, two-part liquids, polyurethane, silicone, film and fast cure products to the durable assembly (appliances and filters), performance wood (windows, doors and wood flooring)~~, insulating glass (windows)~~ and textile (footwear and sportswear).

~~The Americas Adhesives, EIMEA~~, transportation, electronics, medical, clean energy, aerospace and ~~Asia Pacific operating segments include a full range of specialty adhesives such as thermoplastic, thermoset, reactive, water-based~~defense, appliance, heavy machinery and ~~solvent-based products.~~insulating glass markets.

The Construction Adhesives operating segment includes products used for tile setting (adhesives, grouts, mortars, sealers and levelers), the commercial roofing industry (pressure-sensitive adhesives, tapes and sealants) and heating, ventilation and air conditioning and insulation applications (duct sealants, weather barriers and fungicidal coatings and block fillers). This operating segment also includes caulks and sealants for the consumer market and professional trade, sold through retailers, primarily in Australia.

The Engineering Adhesives operating segment produces and supplies high performance industrial adhesives to the transportation, electronics, medical, clean energy, aerospace and defense, appliance and heavy machinery markets.

Principles of Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of H.B. Fuller Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. Investments in affiliated companies in which we exercise significant influence, but which we do not control, are accounted for in the Consolidated Financial Statements under the equity method of accounting. As such, consolidated net income includes our equity portion in current earnings of such companies, after elimination of intercompany profits. Investments in which we do not exercise significant influence (generally less than a 20 percent ownership interest) are accounted for ~~under~~using the ~~cost method.~~measurement alternative.

Our 50 percent ownership in Sekisui-Fuller Company, Ltd., our Japan joint venture, is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as we do not exercise control over the investee. In fiscal years ~~2018~~2020,2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, this equity method investment was not significant as defined in Regulation ~~S-X~~S-X under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As such, financial information as of November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018 ~~and December 3, 2016~~ for Sekisui-Fuller Company, Ltd. is not required.

~~Table of Contents~~

In fiscal year 2017, this equity method investment was significant as defined in Regulation S-X under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As such, financial information as of December 2, 2017 for Sekisui-Fuller Company, Ltd. is as follows:

As of December 2,
2017

Current assets
$ 102,454
Non-current assets
27,732
Current liabilities
40,173
Non-current liabilities
1,583

For the year ended
December 2, 2017

Net revenue
$ 171,302
Gross profit
50,607
Net income
17,735

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to November 30. Fiscal year-end dates were November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018 ~~December 2, 2017~~for 2020,2019 and ~~December 3, 2016 for~~ 2018, ~~2017 and 2016,~~ respectively. ~~Every five or six years we have a 53~~^rd ~~week in our fiscal year. Fiscal 2016 was a 53-week year.~~

Table of Contents

Use of Estimates

Preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

~~For shipments made~~We sell a variety of adhesives, sealants and other specialty chemical products to ~~customers, title generally passes~~a diverse customer base. The vast majority of our arrangements contain a single performance obligation to transfer manufactured goods to the customer ~~when all requirements~~as governed by an individual purchase order.

We recognize revenue at the amount of consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring the ~~sales arrangement have been completed,~~promised goods to the customer. The transaction price includes an estimation of any variable amounts of consideration to which ~~is generally~~we will be entitled. The most common forms of variable consideration within our arrangements are customer rebates, which are recorded as a reduction to revenue at the time of ~~delivery. Revenue from product~~the initial sale using the expected value method. The expected value method is the sum of probability-weighted amounts in a range of possible consideration amounts and is based on a consideration of historical, current and forecast information. Changes in estimates are updated each reporting period. There are no material instances where variable consideration is constrained and not recorded at the initial time of sale. Product returns are recorded as a reduction to revenue based on historical experience and anticipated sales returns that occur in the normal course of business. We primarily have assurance-type warranties that do not result in separate performance obligations. We have elected to present revenue net of sales and other similar taxes.

We recognize revenue when control of goods is ~~recorded when title~~transferred to the ~~product~~customer. For the vast majority of our arrangements, control transfers ~~no remaining performance obligations exist, the terms~~at a point in time either upon shipment or upon delivery of the ~~sale~~goods to the customer. The timing of transfer of control is determined considering the timing of the transfer of legal title, physical possession, and risks and rewards of goods to the customer.

We record shipping and handling revenue in net revenue and outbound shipping and handling costs in cost of goods sold. The majority of our shipping and handling activities are ~~fixed~~performed prior to transfer of control of the goods to the customer. For those arrangements where we provide shipping and collection is probable. Shipping terms include title transfer at either shipping point or destination. Stated terms in sale agreements also include payment terms and freight terms. Net revenues include shipping revenueshandling services after control of the goods has transferred to the customer, we have elected the practical expedient allowed under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606 to account for these activities as ~~appropriate.~~a fulfillment cost rather than as a separate performance obligation.

Provisions for sales returns are estimated based on historical experience, and are adjusted for known returns, if material. Customer incentive programs (primarily volume purchase rebates) and arrangements such as cooperative advertising, slotting fees and buy-downs are recorded as a reduction of net revenue in accordance with ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605-50,~~ ~~Customer Payments and Incentives~~.ASC 606. Customer incentives recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income as a reduction of net revenue, were $34,860, $22,795 and $21,265 ~~$18,158~~in 2020,2019 and ~~$16,465 in~~ 2018, ~~2017 and 2016,~~ respectively.

For certain products, consigned inventory is maintained at customer locations. For this inventory, revenue is recognized in the period that the inventory is consumed. Sales to distributors require a distribution agreement or purchase order. As a normal practice, distributors do not have a right of return.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales includes raw materials, container costs, direct labor, manufacturing overhead, freight costs, and other less significant indirect costs related to the production of our products.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses include sales and marketing, research and development, technical and customer service, finance, legal, human resources, general management and similar expenses. ~~SG&A expenses also include the mark to market adjustment related to the contingent consideration liability.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Income Taxes

The income tax provision is computed based on income before income from equity method investments included in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The asset and liability approach is used to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years are applied to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances reduce deferred tax assets when it is not ~~more-likely-than-not~~ more-likely-than-not that a tax benefit will be realized. See Note 11 for further information.

Table of Contents

Acquisition Accounting

As we enter into business combinations, we perform acquisition accounting requirements including the following:

	●	Identifying the acquirer,
	●	~~Determining the acquisition date,~~●	Determining the acquisition date,

	●	Recognizing and measuring the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, and
	●	Recognizing and measuring goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase

The calculation of the fair value of the tangible assets, including property, plant and equipment, utilizes the cost approach, which computes the cost to replace the asset, less accrued depreciation resulting from physical deterioration, functional obsolescence and external obsolescence. The calculation of the fair value of the identified intangible assets are determined using cash flow models following the income approach or a discounted market-based methodology approach. Significant inputs include estimated revenue growth rates, gross margins, operating expenses and estimated attrition, royalty and discount rates. Goodwill is recorded as the difference in the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and the purchase price.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents are highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less. We review cash and cash equivalent balances on a bank by bank basis to identify book overdrafts. Book overdrafts occur when the amount of outstanding checks exceed the cash deposited at a given bank. Book overdrafts, if any, are included in trade payables in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and in operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Restrictions on Cash

There were no restrictions on cash as of ~~December 1, 2018.~~ November 28, 2020. There are no contractual or regulatory restrictions on the ability of consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries to transfer funds to us, except for typical statutory restrictions which prohibit distributions in excess of net capital or similar tests. The majority of our cash in non-U.S. locations is considered indefinitely reinvested.

Trade ~~Receivable~~Receivables and Allowances

Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Allowances are maintained for doubtful accounts, credits related to pricing or quantities shipped and early payment discounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts includes an estimate of future uncollectible receivables based on the aging of the receivable balance and our collection experience. The allowance also includes specific customer accounts when it is probable that the full amount of the receivable will not be collected. See Note 4 for further information.

~~Table of Contents~~

Inventories

~~Prior to the fourth quarter of 2018, certain inventories in the United States within the Company’s Americas Adhesives and Construction Adhesives segments were~~Inventories are recorded at cost ~~(not~~(not in excess of net realizable value) as determined by the last-in, first-out method (“LIFO”), which represented approximately 25.7 percent of consolidated inventories. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we changed our method of costing for these inventories from LIFO to the weighted-average cost method. This change in accounting principle is preferable because the weighted-average cost method ~~better measures~~and are valued at the ~~current value~~lower of ~~our inventories and conforms the inventory costing methodology for inventory in the United States within the Company’s Americas Adhesives and Construction Adhesives segments to the weighted-average~~ cost method used for the majority of our inventories. The impact of this change in accounting principle on the Consolidated Financial Statements for each period presented is further explained in the Change in Accounting Principle section below.or net realizable value.

Table of Contents

Investments

Investments with a value of ~~$5,048~~$9,006 and $5,062 represent the cash surrender value of life insurance contracts as of ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017,~~ November 30, 2019, respectively. These assets are held to primarily support supplemental pension plans and are recorded in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The corresponding gain or loss associated with these contracts is reported in earnings each period as a component of other income, ~~(expense),~~ net.

~~Cost Method~~Equity Investments

Investments in an entity where we own less than 20% of the voting stock of the entity and do not exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the entity are accounted for using the measurement alternative at cost ~~method.~~less impairment plus or minus observable price changes in orderly transactions. We have a policy in place to review our investments at least annually, to evaluate the accounting method and ~~carrying value of~~identify observable price changes that could indicate impairment. If we believe that an impairment exists, it is our investments in unconsolidated investees. Our cost method investments are evaluated, on at least a quarterly basis, for potential other-than-temporary impairment, or when an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect onpolicy to calculate the fair value of the ~~investments. If we believe that~~investment and recognize as impairment any amount by which the carrying value ~~of an investment is in excess of its estimated~~exceeds the fair value ~~it is our policy to record an impairment charge to adjust~~of the ~~carrying value to the estimated fair value, if the impairment is considered other-than-temporary.~~investment. We did not have any impairment of our ~~cost method~~equity investments for the years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, ~~2018, December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016.~~ 2018. The book value of the ~~cost method~~equity investments was $1,669 as of ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017.~~$1,667 as of November 30, 2019.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated over the useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives range from 20 to 40 years for buildings and improvements, 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment, and the shorter of the lease or expected life for leasehold improvements. Fully depreciated assets are retained in property and accumulated depreciation accounts until removed from service. Upon disposal, assets and related accumulated depreciation are removed. Upon sale of an asset, the difference between the proceeds and remaining net book value is charged or credited to other income, ~~(expense),~~ net on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Expenditures that add value or extend the life of the respective assets are capitalized, while expenditures that are typical recurring repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Interest costs associated with construction and implementation of property, plant and equipment of ~~$285, $306~~$565, $416 and ~~$752~~$285 were capitalized in ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

Goodwill

We evaluate our goodwill for impairment annually asat the beginning of the ~~end of our third~~fourth quarter or earlier upon the occurrence of substantive unfavorable changes in economic conditions, industry trends, costs, cash flows or ongoing declines in market capitalization. The quantitative impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, the assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units, and the determination of fair value of each reporting unit. The impairment test requires the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing the impairment test, we determined the fair value of our reporting units through the income approach by using discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analyses. Determining fair value requires the ~~Company~~company to make judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis for each reporting unit are based on the reporting unit's budget, long-term business plan and recent operating performance. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the future cash flows of the respective reporting unit and market conditions. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered to not be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded for any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value. Based on the analysis performed for our fiscal ~~2018~~2020 annual impairment test, there were no indications of impairment for any of our reporting units. See Note 5 for further information.

~~Table of Contents~~

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include patents, customer lists, technology, trademarks and other intangible assets acquired from independent parties and are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 20 years. The straight-line method of amortization of these assets reflects an appropriate allocation of the costs of the intangible assets to earnings in proportion to the amount of economic benefits obtained in each reporting period.

Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Our long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that a carrying amount of an asset (asset group) may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be measured and recognized when the carrying amount of an asset (asset group) exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset (asset group) and its eventual disposition. The impairment loss to be recorded would be the excess of the asset's carrying value over its fair value. Fair value is generally determined using a ~~discounted cash flow~~DCF analysis or other valuation technique. Costs related to internally developed intangible assets are expensed as incurred.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. functional currency entities are translated to U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates, and the resulting gains and losses arising from the translation of those net assets are recorded as a cumulative translation adjustment, a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders' equity. Revenues and expenses are translated using average exchange rates during the year. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in other income, ~~(expense),~~ net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

We consider a subsidiary’s sales price drivers, currency denomination of sales transactions and inventory purchases to be the primary indicators in determining a foreign subsidiary’s functional currency. Our subsidiaries in certain European countries have a functional currency different than their local currency. All other foreign subsidiaries, which are located in North America, Latin America, Europe and the Asia Pacific region, have the same local and functional currency.

On December 4, 2016, for our subsidiaries in Latin America, we changed the functional currency from the U.S. dollar to the entity’s local currency based on management’s analysis of the changes of the economic facts and circumstances in which these subsidiaries operate. The change in functional currency is accounted for prospectively from December 4, 2016 and financial statements prior to and including the year ended December 3, 2016 have not been restated for the change in functional currency. Monetary assets and liabilities have been remeasured to the U.S. dollar at current exchange rates. Non-monetary assets (property, plant and equipment, net; goodwill; and intangible assets, net) have been remeasured to reflect the difference between the exchange rate when the asset arose and the exchange rate on the date of the change in functional currency. As a result of this change in functional currency, we recorded an $11,317 cumulative translation adjustment included in other comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 2, 2017.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

We sponsor defined-benefit pension plans in both the U.S. and non-U.S. entities. Also in the U.S., we sponsor other postretirement plans for health care and life insurance benefits. Expenses and liabilities for the pension plans and other postretirement plans are actuarially calculated. These calculations are based on our assumptions related to the discount rate, expected return on assets, projected salary increases, health care cost trend rates and mortality rates. The discount rate assumption is determined using an actuarial yield curve approach, which results in a discount rate that reflects the characteristics of the plan. The approach identifies a broad population of corporate bonds that meet the quality and size criteria for the particular plan. We use this approach rather than a specific index that has a certain set of bonds that may or may not be representative of the characteristics of our particular plan. Our expected long-term rate of return on U.S. plan assets was based on our target asset allocation assumption of 60 percent equities and 40 percent ~~fixed-income.~~fixed income. Management, in conjunction with our external financial advisors, determines the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets by considering the expected future returns and volatility levels for each asset class that are based on historical returns and forward-looking observations. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption used in each non-U.S. plan is determined on a plan-by-plan basis for each local jurisdiction and is based on expected future returns for the investment mix of assets currently in the portfolio for that plan. Management, in conjunction with our external financial advisors, develops expected rates of return for each plan, considers expected long-term returns for each asset category in the plan, reviews expectations for inflation for each local jurisdiction, and estimates the impact of active management of the plan’s assets. Note 10 includes disclosure of assumptions employed in these measurements for both the non-U.S. and U.S. plans.

~~Table of Contents~~

Asset Retirement Obligations

We recognize asset retirement obligations ~~(AROs)~~("ARO") in the period in which we have an existing legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The ARO is recognized at fair value when the liability is incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, that cost is capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the remaining estimated useful life of the related asset. We have recognized a liability related to special handling of asbestos related materials in certain facilities for which we have plans or expectation of plans to undertake a major renovation or demolition project that would require the removal of asbestos or have plans or expectation of plans to exit a facility. In addition, we have determined that we have facilities with some level of asbestos that will require abatement action in the future. Once the probability and timeframe of an action are determined, we apply certain assumptions to determine the related liability and asset. These assumptions include the use of inflation rates, the use of credit adjusted risk-free discount rates and the estimation of costs to handle asbestos related materials. The recorded liability is required to be adjusted for changes resulting from the passage of time and/or revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate. The asset retirement obligation liability was ~~$3,646~~$2,948 and ~~$2,129~~$2,952 at ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017,~~ November 30, 2019, respectively.

Table of Contents

Environmental Costs

Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments are made, or remedial efforts are probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. The timing of these accruals is generally no later than the completion of feasibility studies.

Contingent Consideration Liability

Concurrent with a business ~~acquisition,~~acquisitions, we ~~entered~~enter into ~~an agreement~~agreements that ~~requires~~require us to pay the sellers a certain amount based upon a formula related to the entity’s ~~gross profit in 2018.~~financial results. The change in fair value of the contingent consideration liability ~~each reporting period~~ is recorded in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Share-based Compensation

We have various share-based compensation programs which provide for equity awards, including non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, ~~restricted stock shares,~~ restricted stock units, performance awards and deferred compensation. We use the straight-line attribution method to recognize compensation expense associated with share-based awards based on the fair value on the date of grant, net of the estimated forfeiture rate. Expense is recognized over the requisite service period related to each award, which is the period between the grant date and the earlier of the award’s stated vesting term or the date the employee is eligible for early retirement based on the terms of the plan. The fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. All of our stock compensation expense is recorded in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 9 for additional information.

~~Table of Contents~~

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to H.B. Fuller by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted earnings per share is based upon the weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the applicable period. The difference between basic and diluted earnings per share is attributable to share-based compensation awards. We use the treasury stock method to calculate the effect of outstanding awards, which computes total employee proceeds as the sum of (a) the amount the employee must pay upon exercise of the award and (b) the amount of unearned share-based compensation costs attributed to future services. Share-based compensation awards for which total employee proceeds exceed the average market price over the applicable period have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share, and accordingly, are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. The computations for basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:

(in thousands, except per share data)	2018		2017		2016		2020		2019		2018
Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller	$	171,208	$	59,418	$	121,663	$	123,719	$	130,817	$	171,208

Weighted-average common shares – basic		50,591		50,370		50,136		52,039		50,920		50,591
Equivalent shares from share-based compensation plans		1,384		1,249		1,134		481		1,063		1,384
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares – diluted		51,975		51,619		51,270		52,520		51,983		51,975

Basic earnings per share	$	3.38	$	1.18	$	2.43	$	2.38	$	2.57	$	3.38
Diluted earnings per share	$	3.29	$	1.15	$	2.37	$	2.36	$	2.52	$	3.29

Share-based compensation awards for ~~1,905,411, 163,140~~3,982,275, 2,951,697 and ~~657,439~~1,905,411 shares for ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because they were antidilutive.

Table of Contents

Financial Instruments and Derivatives

As a part of our ongoing operations, we are exposed to market risks such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage these risks, we may enter into derivative transactions pursuant to our established policies.

Our objective is to balance, where possible, non-functional currency denominated assets to non-functional currency denominated liabilities to have a natural hedge and minimize foreign exchange impacts. We minimize risks from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations through normal operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative instruments. Derivatives consisted primarily of forward currency contracts used to manage foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. For derivative instruments outstanding that were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, the gains and losses related to mark-to-market adjustments were recognized as other income or expense in the income statement during the periods the derivative instruments were outstanding. To manage exposure to currency rate movements on expected cash flows, the company may enter into cross-currency swap agreements.

The company manages interest expense using a mix of fixed and floating rate debt. To manage exposure to interest rate movements and to reduce borrowing costs, the company may enter into interest rate swap agreements.

Changes in the fair values of derivatives are recorded in net earnings or other comprehensive income, based on the type of derivative, and whether the instrument is designated and effective as a hedge transaction. Gains or losses on derivative instruments reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified to earnings in the period the hedged item affects earnings. Any ineffectiveness is recognized in earnings in the current period. We maintain master netting arrangements that allow us to net settle contracts with the same counterparties; we do not elect to offset amounts in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. These arrangements generally do not call for collateral. We do not enter into any speculative positions with regard to derivative instruments. See Note 12 for further information regarding our financial instruments.

Purchase of Company Common Stock

Under the Minnesota Business Corporation Act, repurchased stock is included in authorized shares, but is not included in shares outstanding. The excess of the repurchase cost over par value is charged to additional paid-in capital. When additional paid-in capital is exhausted, the excess reduces retained earnings. We repurchased ~~71,181, 56,230~~72,000, 73,043 and ~~67,807~~71,181 shares of common stock in ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively, in connection with the statutory minimum ~~for the~~ tax ~~withholdings~~withholding related to vesting of restricted ~~shares.~~stock.

~~Table of Contents~~

Change in Accounting Principle – Leases

~~As described above,~~In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No.2016-02,Leases (Subtopic 842). This ASU changes accounting for leases and requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities arising from all leases, including those classified as operating leases under previous accounting guidance, on the balance sheet and requires disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements to increase transparency and comparability among organizations. In December 2018, the FASB also issued ASU No.2018-20,Leases (Topic 842): Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, which clarifies the accounting for lessors for variable payments that relate to both a lease component and a nonlease component and is effective in the ~~fourth quarter of~~same timeframe as ASU 2016-02, and ASU No.2019-01,Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements, which clarifies the transition disclosure requirements. In July 2018, we elected to change our method of accounting for certain inventories in the United States within the Company’s Americas Adhesives and Construction Adhesives segments from LIFO to weighted-average cost. We have retrospectively adjusted the Consolidated Financial Statements for all periods presented to reflect this change. As a result of the retrospective adjustment for the change in accounting principle, certain amounts in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016 were adjusted as follows:

For the fiscal years ended:

December 2, 2017

December 3, 2016

As reported

Impact of
change to
weighted-
average cost

As adjusted

As reported

Impact of
change to
weighted-
average cost

As adjusted

Cost of sales
$ (1,702,873 ) $ 1,900 $ (1,700,973 ) $ (1,484,802 ) $ (3,981 ) $ (1,488,783 )
Gross profit
603,170 1,900 605,070 609,803 (3,981 ) 605,822
Income taxes
(9,086 ) (724 ) (9,810 ) (50,436 ) 1,516 (48,920 )

Net income including non-controlling interests
58,290 1,176 59,466 124,382 (2,465 ) 121,917

Net income attributable to H. B. Fuller
58,242 1,176 59,418 124,128 (2,465 ) 121,663

Earnings per share attributable to H.B. Fuller common stockholders:

Basic
$ 1.16 $ 0.02 $ 1.18 $ 2.48 $ (0.05 ) $ 2.43
Diluted
1.13 0.02 1.15 2.42 (0.05 ) 2.37

~~The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016 were adjusted as follows:~~

For the fiscal years ended:

December 2, 2017

December 3, 2016

As reported

Impact of
change to
weighted-
average cost

As adjusted

As reported

Impact of
change to
weighted-
average cost

As adjusted

Net income including non-controlling interests
$ 58,290 $ 1,176 $ 59,466 $ 124,382 $ (2,465 ) $ 121,917
Comprehensive income
120,355 1,176 121,531 88,909 (2,465 ) 86,444
Comprehensive income attributable to H.B. Fuller
120,316 1,176 121,492 88,683 (2,465 ) 86,218

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 2, 2017 was adjusted as follows:~~

As reported

Impact of
change to
weighted-
average
cost

As adjusted

Inventories
$ 359,505 $ 12,597 $ 372,102
Other liabilities
341,581 4,800 346,381
Retained earnings
1,119,231 7,797 1,127,028

~~The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016 were adjusted as follows:~~

For the fiscal years ended:

December 2, 2017

December 3, 2016

��
As reported

Impact of
change to
weighted-
average
cost

As adjusted

As reported

Impact of
change to
weighted-
average
cost

As adjusted

Net income including non-controlling interests
$ 58,290 $ 1,176 $ 59,466 $ 124,382 $ (2,465 ) $ 121,917

Adjustments to reconcile net income including non-controlling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:

Deferred income taxes
(20,936 ) (724 ) (21,660 ) 5,344 1,516 6,860

Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:

Inventories
(10,560 ) 1,900 (8,660 ) (3,495 ) (3,981 ) (7,476 )

~~New Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~In August 2018,~~ the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2018-15,~~ ~~Intangibles~~ 2018- Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This ASU requires entities that are customers in cloud computing arrangements to defer implementation costs if they would be capitalized by the entity in software licensing arrangements under the internal-use software guidance. The guidance may be applied retrospectively or prospectively to implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning November 29, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We will early adopt this guidance during the first quarter of 2019 on a prospective basis.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14,~~ ~~Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Topic 715-20): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans.~~ This ASU modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The ASU removes the requirements to disclose: amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year; the amount and timing of plan assets expected to be returned to the employer; and the effects of a one-percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates. The ASU requires disclosure of an explanation of the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning November 28, 2021 with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt the guidance during the fourth quarter of 2018. The only impact of the adoption of this guidance was the changes to the disclosures as discussed above.

~~In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13,~~ ~~Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.~~ This ASU modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The ASU removes the requirement to disclose: the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; the policy for timing of transfers between levels; and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU requires disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income (loss) for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning November 29, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We have evaluated the effect that this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures and determined it will not have a material impact.

~~In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11,~~11, Leases (Topic ~~842)~~842):Targeted ~~Improvements.~~ Improvements. This ASU allows entities to not recast comparative periods in transition to ASC 842 and instead report the comparative periods presented in the period of adoption under ASC 840. The ASU also includes a practical expedient for lessors to not separate the lease and nonlease components of a contract. ~~The amendments in this ASU are effective in the same timeframe as ASU No. 2016-02 as discussed below. We are incorporating this ASU into our assessment and adoption of ASU No. 2016-02.~~

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2018-10,~~2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, ~~Leases.~~ Leases. This ASU includes certain clarifications to address potential narrow-scope implementation issues which we ~~are incorporating~~have incorporated into our assessment and adoption of ASU No. ~~2016-02.~~2016-02.

We adopted these ASUs and related standards during the first quarter ended February 29,2020 using the modified retrospective method of adoption. As a result of the adoption of these ASUs, as of December 1, 2019 we recorded $28,254 of right-of-use assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. Adoption of these ASUs did not have a significant impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income. We have included the disclosures required by these ASUs in Note 6.

Change in Accounting Principle – Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No.2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. We adopted this ASU during the quarter ended March 2, 2019 using the modified retrospective method of adoption. As a result of the adoption of this ASU, we recorded an increase to opening retained earnings of $1,776 as of December 1, 2018 related to accelerated recognition for arrangements where we provide shipping and handling services after control of the goods has transferred to the customer. Prior periods were not restated. We have included the disclosures required by this ASU in Note 15.

Table of Contents

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). This ASU provides guidance on recording revenue on a gross basis versus a net basis based on the determination of whether an entity is a principal or an agent when another party is involved in providing goods or services to a customer. The amendments in this ASU ~~are effective~~affect the guidance in ASU No.2014-09 and were adopted during the ~~same timeframe as~~quarter ended March 2, 2019 with ASU No. ~~2016-02~~2014-09 as discussed ~~below.~~above.

Change in Accounting Principle – Income Tax Impact of Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory

In ~~February 2018,~~ October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2018-02,~~ ~~Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.~~ The ASU addresses the stranded income tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income resulting from the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”, hereafter referred to as “U.S. Tax Reform”. In accordance with ASC Topic 740, the effect of the reduced corporate income tax rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities is included in net income attributable to H.B. Fuller in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ending December 1, 2018. Tax effects on items within accumulated other comprehensive income were left stranded at the historical tax rate. This guidance allows entities to reclassify the stranded income tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. Our effective date for adoption of ASU No. 2018-02 is our fiscal year beginning December 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt the guidance during the first quarter of 2018 using the security-by-security approach. The adoption of this ASU resulted in an $18,341 reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings due to the change in the federal corporate tax rate.

~~In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09,~~ ~~Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting~~. The ASU was issued to provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning December 2, 2018 with early adoption permitted. We will apply this guidance to applicable transactions after the adoption date.

~~In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07,~~ ~~Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,~~2016-16, which requires employers to include only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in operating expenses. The other components of net benefit cost, including amortization of prior service cost/credit, and settlement and curtailment effects, are to be included in nonoperating expenses. The classification requirements of this standard are applied on a retrospective basis. The ASU also stipulates that only the service cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization on a prospective basis. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning December 2, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The components of our net periodic defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit costs are presented in Note 10. The components other than service cost will be presented as nonoperating expenses upon adoption. Service cost will remain in operating expenses.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05,~~ Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets. The ASU was issued to clarify the scope of the previous standard and to add guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning December 2, 2018. We have evaluated the effect that this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures and determined it will not have a material impact.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,~~ ~~Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,~~which removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. Our effective date for prospective adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning November 29, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt the guidance for fiscal 2018. We applied this guidance to applicable impairment tests upon adoption.

~~In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).~~ This ASU requires that the reconciliation of the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown in the statement of cash flows include cash and restricted cash equivalents. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning December 2, 2018. We have evaluated the effect that this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures and determined it will not have a material impact.

~~In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16,~~ Income Taxes (Topic ~~740)~~740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.This ASU changes the timing of income tax recognition for an intercompany sale of assets. The ASU requires the seller’s tax effects and the buyer’s deferred taxes to be recognized immediately upon the sale instead of deferring accounting for the income tax implications until the assets are sold to a third party or recovered through use. ~~Our effective date for~~We adopted this ASU during the quarter ended March 2, 2019. We recorded a decrease to opening retained earnings of $733 as of December 1, 2018 as a result of the adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning December 2, 2018. We have evaluated the effect that this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures and determined it will not have a material impact.ASU.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~August 2016,~~ March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2016-15,~~2020-04, ~~Statement of Cash Flows~~Reference Rate Reform (Topic ~~230)~~848): ~~Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus~~Facilitation of the ~~Emerging Issues Task Force)~~Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. This ASU ~~requires changes~~provides practical expedients and exception for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. This ASU is applicable to our contracts and hedging relationships that reference LIBOR. The guidance is effective immediately and may be applied through December 31, 2022. The FASB also issued ASU No.2021-01,Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope in January 2021. It clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU No.2020-04 and are effective in the ~~presentation~~same timeframe as ASU No.2020-04. We are evaluating whether to apply any of ~~certain items including but not limited to debt prepayment~~ the expedients and/or debt extinguishment costs; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies and distributions received from equity method investees. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning December 2, 2018. Adoption of this guidance will have a presentation impact only and will resultexceptions included in ~~a retrospective reclassification of debt prepayment and extinguishment costs within the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows from operating to financing cash outflows.~~these ASUs.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2016-13~~2016-13,, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic ~~326)~~326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial ~~Statements.~~ Statements. This ASU requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset(s) to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. ~~In November 2018, the~~The FASB also issued ASU No. ~~2018-19,~~2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments –- Credit ~~Losses.~~Losses ~~This~~ in November 2018, ASUNo.2019-04,Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments in April 2019 and ASU No.2019-11,Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments in November 2019. ASU No.2018-19 clarifies that receivables arising from operating leases are within the scope of Topic 842, Leases. ASU No.2019-04 and ASU No.2019-11 clarify various scoping and other issues arising from ASU No.2016-13. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU No. ~~2016-13~~2016-13 and are effective in the same timeframe as ASU No. ~~2016-13.~~2016-13. Our effective date for adoption of ~~this guidance~~these ASUs is our fiscal year beginning November 29, 2020. ~~We are currently evaluating~~Based on the ~~effect~~conducted analyses and due to the nature and extent of our assets in scope of this ASU (accounts receivable) and the historical, current and expected credit quality of our customers, we have determined that this ~~guidance~~ASU will nothave a material impact on our Consolidated ~~Financial Statements.~~Statements of Income or the Balance Sheet.

~~In March 2016,~~Recently issued accounting standards or pronouncements not disclosed above have been excluded as they are not relevant to the ~~FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,~~ ~~Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.~~ This ASU provides simplification in the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, statutory tax withholding requirements and classification in the statement of cash flows. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter of 2018. As a result of adoption, excess tax benefits/deficiencies are now recorded as income tax expense and are dependent upon market prices and the volume of stock option exercises and restricted stock vestings during the reporting period. Excess tax benefits of $1,047 were recorded as a reduction to income tax expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income during the year ended December 1, 2018. Excess tax benefits/deficiencies are now also classified as operating activities within the statement of cash flows and are excluded from the calculation of assumed proceeds available to repurchase shares under the treasury stock method. Cash payments to tax authorities for withheld shares in net-settlement features are classified as financing activities. These changes are applied prospectively, with the exception of the classification of cash payments to tax authorities in the statement of cash flows, which were already classified as financing activities. Therefore, no prior period adjustments were made as a result of the adoption of this guidance. We are continuing our existing practice of estimating the number of awards that will be forfeited in accordance with this ASU.company.

Table of Contents

~~In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)~~. This ASU provides guidance on recording revenue on a gross basis versus a net basis based on the determination of whether an entity is a principal or an agent when another party is involved in providing goods or services to a customer. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09Note 2: Acquisitions and ~~are effective in the same timeframe as ASU No. 2014-09 as discussed below.~~

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases (Subtopic 842).~~ This guidance changes accounting for leases and requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities arising from all leases, including those classified as operating leases under previous accounting guidance, on the balance sheet and requires disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements to increase transparency and comparability among organizations. In December 2018, the FASB also issued ASU No. 2018-20, ~~Leases (Topic 842): Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors~~, which clarifies the accounting for lessors for variable payments that relate to both a lease component and a nonlease component and is effective in the same timeframe as ASU 2016-02. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning December 1, 2019 with early adoption permitted. The new guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach, and provides for certain practical expedients. We have begun implementing lease accounting software and are currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,~~ ~~Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~, which requires that equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) are to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Furthermore, equity investments without readily determinable fair values are to be assessed for impairment using a quantitative approach. Our effective date for adoption of this guidance is our fiscal year beginning December 2, 2018. We have evaluated the effect that this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures and determined it will not have a material impact.

~~In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),~~ which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (as stated in ASU No. 2015-14 which defers the effective date and was issued in August 2015) and is now effective for our fiscal year beginning December 2, 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We intend to adopt this guidance using the modified retrospective method. We have completed contract reviews and have determined there are no significant impacts, as our revenue transactions are not accounted for under industry-specific guidance superseded by the ASU and generally consist of a single performance obligation to transfer promised goods or services. In addition to assessing the impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements, we have completed our analysis of the impact of the new standard on our business processes, systems and controls to support recognition and disclosure requirements under this ASU.

Note 9:9: Accounting for Share-Based Compensation

Overview

We have various share-based compensation programs, which provide for equity awards including non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock ~~shares, restricted stock~~ units, performance awards and deferred compensation. These equity awards fall under several plans and are described below. ~~Starting in 2014, we no longer grant restricted stock shares.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Share-based Compensation Plans

We currently grant stock options and restricted stock units under equity compensation and deferred compensation plans.

Stock options are granted to officers and key employees at prices not less than the fair market value at the date of grant. Non-qualified stock options are generally exercisable beginning one year from the date of grant in cumulative yearly amounts of 33.3 percent. Incentive stock options are based on certain ~~performance based~~performance-based criteria and are generally exercisable at a stated date when the performance criteria is measured. Stock options generally have a contractual term of 10 years. Options exercised represent newly issued shares.

Table of Contents

Restricted stock awards are nonvested stock-based awards that ~~may~~ include grants of ~~restricted stock shares or~~ restricted stock units. Restricted stock awards are independent of option grants and are subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to the release of the restrictions. Such awards generally vest beginning one year from the date of grant or 33.3 percent per year for three years, depending on the grant. During the vesting period, ownership of the shares cannot be transferred.

Restricted stock shares granted represent newly issued shares and have the same cash dividend and voting rights as other common stock and are considered to be currently issued and outstanding. The cash dividends on restricted stock shares are forfeitable.

Restricted stock units have dividend equivalent rights equal to the cash dividend paid on restricted stock shares. However, restricted stock units do not have voting rights of common stock and are not considered issued and outstanding upon grant. Restricted stock units become newly issued shares when vested. The dividend equivalent rights for restricted stock units are forfeitable.

We expense the cost, which is the grant date fair market value, of ~~both the restricted stock shares and~~ the restricted stock units ratably over the period during which the restrictions lapse. The grant date fair value is our closing stock price on the date of grant.

We are required to recognize compensation expense when an employee is eligible to retire. We consider employees eligible to retire at age 55 and after 10 years of service. Awards granted to retirement-eligible employees are forfeited if the retirement-eligible employees retire prior to 180 days after the grant. Accordingly, the related compensation expense is recognized ~~immediately~~during the 180 day period for awards granted to ~~retirement eligible~~retirement-eligible employees or over the period from the grant date to the date retirement eligibility is achieved, if less than the stated vesting period.

2020 Master Incentive Plan

This plan allows for granting of awards to employees. The plan permits granting of (a) stock options; (b) stock appreciation rights; (c) restricted stock and restricted stock units; (d) performance awards; (e) dividend equivalents; (f) other awards based on our common stock, including shares for amounts employees deferred under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan. There were 1,679,579 common shares available for grant as of November 28, 2020.

2018 Master Incentive Plan

This plan allows for granting of awards to employees. The plan permits granting of (a) stock options; (b) stock appreciation rights; (c) restricted stock and restricted stock units; (d) performance awards; (e) dividend equivalents; (f) other awards based on our common stock, including shares for amounts employees deferred under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan. ~~There were 2,844,637 common shares available for grant as of December 1, 2018.~~

Year 2016 Master Incentive Plan

This plan allows for granting of awards to employees. The plan permits granting of (a) stock options; (b) stock appreciation rights; (c) restricted stock awards; (d) performance awards; (e) dividend equivalents; and (f) other awards based on our common stock, including shares for amounts employees deferred under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan.

2009 Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan

This plan permits granting of (a) shares for amounts non-employee directors defer under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan and (b) discretionary grants of restricted stock, stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance awards and other stock awards.

Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan

This plan allows non-employee directors to defer all or a portion of their retainer and meeting fees in a number of investment choices, including units representing shares of our common stock. We provide a 10 percent match on deferred compensation invested in these units. These units are required to be paid out in our common stock.

~~Table of Contents~~

Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan

This plan allows key employees to defer a portion of their eligible compensation in a number of investment choices, including units representing shares of company common stock. We provide a 10 percent match on deferred compensation invested in these units.

Table of Contents

Grant-Date Fair ~~Value~~Valu

We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of stock option awards. The fair value of options granted during ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016~~2018 were calculated using the following assumptions:

2018

2017

2016

Expected life (in years)
4.75 4.75 4.75
Weighted-average expected volatility
23.31 % 24.17 % 28.95 %
Expected volatility range
23.18% - 23.58 % 23.48% - 24.88 % 24.86% - 29.23 %
Risk-free interest rate
2.38% - 2.95 % 1.80% - 1.99 % 0.96% - 1.44 %
Weighted-average expected dividend 1.14 % 1.07 % 1.54 %
Expected dividend yield range
1.12% - 1.24 % 1.02% - 1.16 % 1.20% - 1.56 %
Weighted-average fair value of grants
$ 11.38 $ 11.49 $ 7.75

		2020				2019					2018
Expected life (in years)				5.00					4.75					4.75
Weighted-average expected volatility				24.32	%				24.26	%				23.31	%
Expected volatility range		24.18%	-	30.99	%		23.88%	-	24.76	%		23.18%	-	23.58	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.21%	-	1.51	%		1.34%	-	2.55	%		2.38%	-	2.95	%
Weighted-average expected dividend				1.38	%				1.40	%				1.14	%
Expected dividend yield range		1.35%	-	2.53	%		1.25%	-	1.45	%		1.12%	-	1.24	%
Weighted-average fair value of grants	$			*9.63*		$			9.76		$			11.38

Expected life – We use historical employee exercise and option expiration data to estimate the expected life assumption for the Black-Scholes grant-date valuation. We believe that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of a new option. We use a weighted-average expected life for all awards.

Expected volatility – Volatility is calculated using our stock’s historical volatility for the same period of time as the expected life. We have no reason to believe that its future volatility will differ from the past.

Risk-free interest rate – The rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant for the same period of time as the expected life.

Expected dividend yield – The calculation is based on the total expected annual dividend payout divided by the average stock price.

Expense

We use the straight-line attribution method to recognize share-based compensation expense for option awards ~~restricted stock shares~~ and restricted stock units with graded and cliff vesting. Incentive stock options and performance awards are based on certain performance-based metrics and the expense is adjusted quarterly, based on our projections of the achievement of those metrics. The amount of share-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the value of the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest. The expense is recognized over the requisite service period, which for us is the period between the grant date and the earlier of the award’s stated vesting term or the date the employee is eligible for early vesting based on the terms of the plans.

Total share-based compensation expense was $16,914, $24,003 and $17,113 ~~$17,503~~for 2020,2019 and ~~$13,344 for~~ 2018, ~~2017 and 2016,~~ respectively. All share-based compensation was recorded as SG&A expense.

~~During the first quarter of 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2016-09,~~ ~~Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.~~ The adoption is required to be implemented prospectively. Upon adoption of this ASU, the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation costs (excess tax benefits) are recorded as income tax expense in accordance with ASU No. 2016-09. Excess tax benefits of $1,047 were recorded as a reduction to income tax expense for 2018. Previously, the excess tax benefits were recorded in additional paid in capital (“APIC”) and were recorded as a financing cash inflow rather than a deduction of taxes paid. For 2017 and 2016, there was $2,010 and $1,641 of excess tax benefit recognized resulting from share-based compensation cost, respectively. See Note 1 for additional information regarding ASU No. 2016-09.

As of ~~December 1, 2018, $7,212~~November 28, 2020, $6,044 of unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock option awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of ~~1.2~~0.7 years. Unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested restricted stock units was ~~$9,575~~$5,304 which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of ~~1.0~~0.9 years.

Table of Contents

Stock Option Activity

The stock option activity for the years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018 ~~December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016~~ is summarized below:

Weighted-

Average

Options

Exercise Price

Outstanding at November 28, 2015
2,912,073 $ 30.37
Granted
853,516 33.98
Exercised
(593,891 ) 24.38
Forfeited or cancelled
(185,217 ) 39.91
Outstanding at December 3, 2016
2,986,481 $ 34.92
Granted
1,493,133 53.97
Exercised
(514,064 ) 34.51
Forfeited or cancelled
(104,786 ) 37.20
Outstanding at December 2, 2017
3,860,764 $ 42.28

Granted
818,537 53.06
Exercised
(198,849 ) 31.37
Forfeited or cancelled
(14,346 ) 48.62
Outstanding at December 1, 2018
4,466,106 $ 44.72

On October 20, 2017, in connection with the closing of the Royal Adhesives acquisition, grants of performance-based non-qualified stock options were made to executive officers at certain target level amounts. On May 15, 2018, additional grants of performance-based non-qualified stock options were made to certain members of management other than the executive officers at the same target level amounts. Target level non-qualified stock options amounts may increase to 150% of the target amount based on fiscal year 2020 adjusted EBITDA performance. The performance-based non-qualified stock options agreement provides for cliff vesting in the event that fiscal year 2020 adjusted EBITDA (defined as Adjusted Operating Income plus Depreciation plus Amortization) performance criteria is met at least at a threshold level in order to promote the successful integration of the Royal Adhesives business into the Company’s operations.

				Weighted-
				Average
	Options			Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 2, 2017		3,860,764		$	42.28
Granted		818,537			53.06
Exercised		(198,849	)		31.37
Forfeited or cancelled		(14,346	)		48.62
Outstanding at December 1, 2018		4,466,106		$	44.72
Granted		1,020,246			45.53
Exercised		(378,734	)		28.74
Forfeited or cancelled		(47,308	)		48.90
Outstanding at November 30, 2019		5,060,310		$	46.04
Granted		1,052,968			47.70
Exercised		(397,456	)		31.00
Forfeited or cancelled		(169,907	)		49.11
Outstanding at November 28, 2020		5,545,915		$	47.34

The fair value of options granted during ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016~~2018 was ~~$9,217, $17,157~~$10,132, $9,956 and ~~$6,615,~~$9,217, respectively. Total intrinsic value of options exercised during ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016~~2018 was ~~$4,534, $8,677~~$6,563, $7,590 and ~~$11,675,~~$4,534, respectively. For options outstanding at ~~December 1, 2018,~~ November 28, 2020, the weighted-average remaining contractual life was ~~7.0~~6.7 years and the aggregate intrinsic value was ~~$28,290.~~$38,430. There were ~~2,241,666~~2,983,960 options exercisable at ~~December 1, 2018,~~ November 28, 2020, with a weighted-average remaining contractual life of ~~5.3~~5.4 years and an aggregate intrinsic value of ~~$25,006.~~$27,098. Intrinsic value is the difference between our closing stock price on the respective trading day and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options exercised. Proceeds received from option exercises during the year ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018 ~~December 2, 2017~~were $12,321, $10,885 and ~~December 3, 2016 were~~ $6,237, ~~$17,705 and $11,269,~~ respectively. The ~~Company’s~~company’s actual tax benefits realized for the tax deductions related to the exercise of stock options for ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016~~2018 was ~~$868, $2,723~~$1,278, $1,298 and ~~$3,506,~~$868, respectively.

Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Activity

The nonvested restricted stock activity for the years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018 ~~December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016~~ is summarized below:

Weighted-

Weighted-

Average

Average

Remaining

Grant

Contractual

Date Fair

Life

Units

Shares

Total

Value

(in Years)

Nonvested at November 28, 2015
237,013 110,160 347,173 $ 42.17 0.8
Granted
253,515 - 253,515 35.40 1.3
Vested
(104,828 ) (73,028 ) (177,856 ) 41.91 -
Forfeited
(32,956 ) (179 ) (33,135 ) 38.40 1.5
Nonvested at December 3, 2016
352,744 36,953 389,697 $ 38.36 1.0
Granted
287,684 - 287,684 50.05 1.2
Vested
(156,152 ) (36,953 ) (193,105 ) 39.92 -
Forfeited
(22,035 ) - (22,035 ) 39.67 1.1
Nonvested at December 2, 2017
462,241 - 462,241 $ 44.80 1.0
Granted
165,909 - 165,909 45.92 2.2
Vested
(209,137 ) - (209,137 ) 40.38 -
Forfeited
(4,660 ) - (4,660 ) 47.27 1.1
Nonvested at December 1, 2018
414,353 - 414,353 $ 47.45 1.0

~~Table of Contents~~

						Weighted-
				*Weighted-*		*Average*
				*Average*		*Remaining*
				*Grant*		*Contractual*
				*Date Fair*		*Life*
	*Units*			*Value*		*(in Years)*
Nonvested at December 2, 2017		462,241		$	44.80		1.0
Granted		165,909			45.92		2.2
Vested		(209,137	)		40.38		-
Forfeited		(4,660	)		47.27		1.1
Nonvested at December 1, 2018		414,353		$	47.45		1.0
Granted		302,132			44.29		2.2
Vested		(197,349	)		45.45		-
Forfeited		(31,139	)		43.37		0.4
Nonvested at November 30, 2019		487,997		$	46.56		0.8
Granted		216,293			46.39		3.4
Vested		(221,275	)		46.83		-
Forfeited		(50,666	)		47.55		0.1
Nonvested at November 28, 2020		432,349		$	46.22		0.8

Total fair value of restricted stock vested during ~~2018, 2017,~~2020,2019, and ~~2016~~2018 was ~~$8,892, $7,708~~$10,362, $8,970 and ~~$6,257,~~$8,892, respectively. The total fair value of nonvested restricted stock at ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 was ~~$19,661.~~ $19,984.

We repurchased ~~71,181, 56,230~~70,380, 73,043 and ~~67,807 restricted stock~~71,181 shares during ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively, in ~~conjunction~~connection with ~~restricted stock share vestings. The repurchases relate to~~the statutory minimum tax ~~withholding.~~withholding related to vesting of restricted stock. The ~~Company’s~~company’s actual tax benefits realized for the tax deductions related to the restricted stock vested for ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016~~2018 was ~~$2,649, $3,059~~$2,136, $1,574 and ~~$2,080~~$2,649 respectively.

Deferred Compensation Activity

Deferred compensation units are fully vested at the date of contribution. The deferred compensation units outstanding for the years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018 ~~December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016~~ is summarized below:

	Non-employee									Non-employee
	Directors			Employees			Total			Directors			Employees			Total
Units outstanding November 28, 2015		380,170			45,906			426,076
Participant contributions		23,900			4,908			28,808
Company match contributions¹		20,576			491			21,067
Payouts		(327	)		(10,189	)		(10,516	)
Units outstanding December 3, 2016		424,319			41,116			465,435
Participant contributions		16,051			5,567			21,618
Company match contributions¹		17,343			557			17,900
Payouts		(14,143	)		(15,634	)		(29,777	)
Units outstanding December 2, 2017		443,570			31,606			475,176			443,570			31,606			475,176

Participant contributions		16,164			7,589			23,753			16,164			7,589			23,753
Company match contributions¹		20,053			759			20,812			20,053			759			20,812
Payouts		-			(10,219	)		(10,219	)		0			(10,219	)		(10,219	)
Units outstanding December 1, 2018		479,787			29,735			509,522			479,787			29,735			509,522
Participant contributions											22,153			11,166			33,319
Company match contributions¹											23,720			1,117			24,837
Payouts											0			(5,354	)		(5,354	)
Units outstanding November 30, 2019											525,660			36,664			562,324
Participant contributions											18,008			13,814			31,822
Company match contributions¹											23,033			1,381			24,414
Payouts											(111,436	)		(7,306	)		(118,742	)
Units outstanding November 28, 2020											455,265			44,553			499,818

¹ The non-employee directors’ company match includes ~~18,436~~21,323, 21,504 and ~~15,738 and 18,186~~18,436 deferred compensation units paid as discretionary awards to all non-employee directors in ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

Table of Contents

The fair value of non-employee directors’ company matches for ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016~~2018 was ~~$152, $133~~$128, $167 and ~~$156,~~$152, respectively. The fair value of the non-employee directors’ discretionary award was $920 for 2020 and $1,035 for ~~2018, $805 for 2017~~each of 2019 and ~~$800 for 2016.~~2018. The fair value of employee company matches was $56, $41 and $27 for ~~2018~~2020,2019 and ~~$26 for 2017 and $18 for 2016.~~2018, respectively.

Note 10: Pension and Postretirement Benefits

Defined Contribution Plan

All U.S. employees have the option of contributing up to 75 percent of their pre-tax earnings to a ~~401(k)~~401(k) plan, subject to IRS limitations. We match up to the first 4 percent of each employee's pre-tax earnings, based on the employee’s contributions. All U.S. employees are eligible for a separate annual non-discretionary retirement contribution to the ~~401(k)~~401(k) plan of 31 percent of pay, that is invested based on the election of the individual participant. The 31 percent contribution is in addition to our 4 percent matching contribution described above and is in lieu of participation in our defined benefit pension plan. The total contribution to the ~~401(k)~~401(k) plan for ~~2018~~2020 was ~~$11,034~~$10,764 which included the cost of the 4 percent company match of ~~$5,293~~$7,468 and the additional 31 percent contribution of ~~$5,741.~~$3,296. The total contributions to the ~~401(k)~~401(k) plan were ~~$10,899~~$10,784 and ~~$10,417~~$11,034 in ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

All U.S. employees are eligible to receive an annual discretionary non-elective contribution to the 401(k) plan of up to 3 percent based on achieving the company’s earnings per share target. This discretionary contribution is in addition to the contributions described above. No such contribution was made during 2020 and 2019.

The defined contribution plan liability recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets was ~~$20,183~~$9,819 and ~~$6,307~~$8,494 in ~~2018~~2020 and ~~2017,~~2019, respectively, for the U.S. Plan and several statutorily required non-U.S. Plans.

~~Table of Contents~~

Defined Benefit ~~Plan~~sPlans

Noncontributory defined benefit pension plans cover all U.S. employees employed prior to January 1, 2007. Benefits for these plans are based primarily on each employee’s years of service and average compensation. During 2011, we made significant changes to our U.S. Pension Plan. The changes included: benefits under the ~~U.S. Pension Plan~~plan were locked-in using service and salary as of May 31, 2011, participants no longer earn benefits for future service and salary as they had in the past, affected participants receive a three percent increase to the locked-in benefit for every year they continue to work for us and we are making a retirement contribution of three percent of eligible compensation to the ~~401(k)~~401(k) Plan for those participants. The funding policy is consistent with the funding requirements of federal law and regulations. Plan assets consist principally of listed equity securities and bonds. During ~~2015,~~2020, we amended the U.S. Pension Plan to add a program for eligible employees to take a lump sum distribution. ~~No lump sum payments were~~A total of $10,939 was paid during ~~2018 and 2017. Lump sum payments of $8,399 were made during 2016~~2020 as distributions under this program. Other U.S. postretirement benefits are funded through a Voluntary Employees' Beneficiaries Association Trust.

Health care and life insurance benefits are provided for eligible retired employees and their eligible dependents. These benefits are provided through various insurance companies and health care providers. Costs are accrued during the years the employee renders the necessary service.

Certain non-U.S. subsidiaries provide pension benefits for their employees consistent with local practices and regulations. These plans are primarily defined benefit plans covering substantially all employees upon completion of a specified period of service. Benefits for these plans are generally based on years of service and annual compensation.

Table of Contents

Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets as of ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017:~~November 30, 2019:

		Pension Benefits												Other Postretirement							Pension Benefits												Other Postretirement
		U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans						Benefits							U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans						Benefits
		2018			2017			2018			2017			2018			2017				2020			2019			2020			2019			2020			2019
Change in projected benefit obligation	Change in projected benefit obligation																			*Change in projected benefit obligation*
Benefit obligation at beginning of year		$	379,359		$	362,213		$	223,982		$	202,176		$	43,325		$	42,721			$	380,388		$	336,889		$	234,542		$	208,075		$	39,256		$	36,842
Service cost			56			111			2,311			2,125			173			208				0			4			2,950			2,237			73			98
Interest cost			12,251			15,836			4,671			4,709			1,484			1,593				11,738			14,691			3,158			4,678			1,135			1,550
Participant contributions			-			-			-			-			330			200				0			0			0			0			226			240
Plan amendments			-			-			1,600			-			-			-
Actuarial (gain)/loss¹			(33,052	)		14,405			(3,377	)		(6,636	)		(5,225	)		2,078				27,377			49,211			4,350			30,517			1,327			3,749
Special termination benefits			-			6,518			-			12,156			-			-
Other																						0			0			0			(103	)		0			0
Curtailments																						0			0			14			0			0			0
Settlement payments			-			-			-			(62	)		-			-				(10,939	)		0			(273	)		(307	)		0			0
Benefits paid			(21,725	)		(19,724	)		(10,059	)		(8,495	)		(3,245	)		(3,475	)			(20,034	)		(20,407	)		(8,628	)		(8,356	)		(2,942	)		(3,223	)
Foreign currency translation effect			-			-			(11,053	)		18,009			-			-				0			0			14,448			(2,199	)		0			0
Benefit obligation at end of year			336,889			379,359			208,075			223,982			36,842			43,325				388,530			380,388			250,561			234,542			39,075			39,256

Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year			378,099			331,505			187,708			163,322			79,300			66,640				383,527			346,460			185,331			169,455			94,474			82,910
Acquisition			-			4,605			-			-			-			-
Actual return on plan assets			(11,768	)		60,176			(1,240	)		16,889			4,058			14,631				44,365			54,527			13,155			22,945			15,673			12,046
Employer contributions			1,854			1,537			2,237			1,863			2,467			1,304				1,677			3,124			2,177			2,437			1,625			2,501
Participant contributions			-			-			-			-			330			200				0			0			0			0			226			240
Other			-			-			-			(272	)		-			-				0			0			0			(103	)		0			0
Settlement payments																						(10,939	)		0			0			0			0			0
Benefits paid²			(21,725	)		(19,724	)		(10,059	)		(8,223	)		(3,245	)		(3,475	)			(20,227	)		(20,584	)		(8,628	)		(8,356	)		(2,942	)		(3,223	)
Foreign currency translation effect			-			-			(9,191	)		14,129			-			-				0			0			10,207			(1,047	)		0			0
Fair value of plan assets at end of year			346,460			378,099			169,455			187,708			82,910			79,300				398,403			383,527			202,242			185,331			109,056			94,474
Plan assets in excess of (less than) benefit obligation as of year end		$	9,571		$	(1,260	)	$	(38,620	)	$	(36,274	)	$	46,068		$	35,975			$	9,873		$	3,139		$	(48,688	)	$	(49,211	)	$	69,981		$	55,218

1 Actuarial gain in 2018 and actuarial loss in 2017 for the U.S. Plans is primarily due to assumption changes. Actuarial gains in 2018 and 2017 for the Non-U.S. Plans are due to both assumption changes and plan experience.

~~2 Amount excludes benefit payments made from sources other than plan assets.~~

¹ Actuarial loss in 2020 and actuarial loss in 2019 for the U.S. Plans is primarily due to assumption changes. Actuarial loss in 2020 and actuarial loss in 2019 for the Non-U.S. Plans are due to both assumption changes and plan experience.

² Amount excludes benefit payments made from sources other than plan assets.

Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) that have not been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost	Pension Benefits										Other Postretirement
	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans				Benefits
	2020			2019			2020		2019		2020			2019
Unrecognized actuarial loss	$	147,917		$	146,149		$	87,368	$	83,457	$	(4,318	)	$	2,114
Unrecognized prior service (benefit) cost		(6	)		(9	)		1,453		1,476		0			0
Ending balance	$	147,911		$	146,140		$	88,821	$	84,933	$	(4,318	)	$	2,114

Table of Contents

Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) that have not been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost

Pension Benefits

Other Postretirement

U.S. Plans

Non-U.S. Plans

Benefits

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

Unrecognized actuarial loss
$ 130,661 $ 131,643 $ 69,762 $ 67,344 $ 3,430 $ 5,877
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)
4 32 1,520 (4 ) - -
Ending balance
$ 130,665 $ 131,675 $ 71,282 $ 67,340 $ 3,430 $ 5,877

	Pension Benefits												Other Postretirement						Pension Benefits												Other Postretirement
	U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans						Benefits						U.S. Plans						Non-U.S. Plans						Benefits
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2018			2017			2020			2019			2020			2019			2020			2019
Statement of financial position as of fiscal year-end
Non-current assets	$	28,396		$	19,520		$	9,467		$	10,912		$	48,872		$	39,163		$	30,672		$	22,480		$	12,534		$	6,263		$	73,137		$	58,307
Accrued benefit cost
Current liabilities		(1,493	)		(1,501	)		(2,077	)		(1,879	)		(201	)		(210	)		(1,467	)		(1,418	)		(1,701	)		(1,723	)		(226	)		(210	)
Non-current liabilities		(17,332	)		(19,279	)		(46,010	)		(45,307	)		(2,603	)		(2,978	)		(19,332	)		(17,922	)		(59,521	)		(53,750	)		(2,930	)		(2,879	)
Ending balance	$	9,571		$	(1,260	)	$	(38,620	)	$	(36,274	)	$	46,068		$	35,975		$	9,873		$	3,140		$	(48,688	)	$	(49,210	)	$	69,981		$	55,218

The accumulated benefit obligation of the U.S. pension and other postretirement plans was ~~$364,788~~$418,019 at ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~$409,376~~$409,800 at ~~December 2, 2017.~~ November 30, 2019. The accumulated benefit obligation of the non-U.S. pension plans was ~~$200,193~~$239,572 at ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~$214,512~~$224,619 at ~~December 2, 2017.~~November 30, 2019.

The following amounts relate to pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets as of November 28, 2020 and November 30, 2019:

	Pension Benefits and Other Postretirement Benefits
	U.S. Plans				Non-U.S. Plans
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Accumulated benefit obligation	$	26,241	$	24,344	$	134,472	$	125,073
Fair value of plan assets		5,441		5,004		84,239		79,437

The following amounts relate to pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets as of November 28, 2020 and November 30, 2019:

	Pension Benefits and Other Postretirement Benefits
	U.S. Plans				Non-U.S. Plans
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Projected benefit obligation	$	26,241	$	24,344	$	145,461	$	134,910
Fair value of plan assets		5,441		5,004		84,239		79,437

Information about the expected cash flows is as follows:

	Pension Benefits				Other
	U.S. Plans		Non-U.S. Plans		Postretirement Benefits
Employer contributions
2021	$	312	$	54	$	1,500
Expected benefit payments
2021		21,084		16,196		2,999
2022		21,521		8,689		2,938
2023		21,127		8,710		2,872
2024		21,444		8,943		2,772
2025-2030		105,296		47,195		12,092

The components of our net period defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit costs other than service cost are presented as non-operating expenses and service cost is presented in operating expenses.

Table of Contents

Components of net periodic benefit cost and other supplemental information for the years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018 are as follows:

~~The following amounts relate to pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets as of December 1, 2018 and December 2, 2017:~~

Pension Benefits and Other Postretirement Benefits

U.S. Plans

Non-U.S. Plans

2018

2017

2018

2017

Accumulated benefit obligation
$ 23,289 $ 25,349 $ 115,725 $ 120,459
Fair value of plan assets
4,514 4,669 75,397 82,631

	Pension Benefits																		Other
	U.S. Plans									Non-U.S. Plans									Postretirement Benefits
Net periodic cost (benefit)	2020			2019			2018			2020			2019			2018			2020			2019			2018
Service cost	$	0		$	4		$	56		$	2,950		$	2,237		$	2,311		$	73		$	98		$	173
Interest cost		11,738			14,691			12,251			3,158			4,678			4,671			1,135			1,550			1,484
Expected return on assets		(25,758	)		(25,305	)		(26,167	)		(11,312	)		(10,224	)		(11,105	)		(7,976	)		(7,013	)		(6,896	)
Amortization:
Prior service cost (benefit)		(3	)		13			29			64			64			(4	)		0			0			0
Actuarial loss		7,195			4,677			5,904			3,829			3,114			2,901			62			33			60
Curtailment loss		0			0			0			14			83			0			0			0			0
Settlement charge		0			0			0			67			0			0			0			0			0
Net periodic (benefit) cost	$	(6,828	)	$	(5,920	)	$	(7,927	)	$	(1,230	)	$	(48	)	$	(1,226	)	$	(6,706	)	$	(5,332	)	$	(5,179	)

~~The following amounts relate to pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets as of December 1, 2018 and December 2, 2017:~~

	Pension Benefits																		Other
	U.S. Plans									Non-U.S. Plans									Postretirement Benefits
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations	2020			2019			2018			2020			2019			2018			2020			2019			2018
Discount rate		2.50	%		3.17	%		4.50	%		1.16	%		1.35	%		2.29	%		2.19	%		3.00	%		4.37	%
Rate of compensation increase¹		4.50	%		4.50	%		4.50	%		1.74	%		1.71	%		1.75	%		*N/A*			N/A			N/A

Pension Benefits and Other Postretirement Benefits

U.S. Plans

Non-U.S. Plans

2018

2017

2018

2017

Projected benefit obligation
$ 23,338 $ 25,449 $ 123,484 $ 137,618
Fair value of plan assets
4,514 4,669 75,397 90,434

~~Information about the expected cash flows is as follows:~~

Pension Benefits

Other

U.S. Plans

Non-U.S. Plans

Postretirement
Benefits

Employer contributions

2018
$ - $ 248 $ 2,000
Expected benefit payments

2019
$ 20,723 $ 8,420 $ 3,030
2020
20,757 8,227 3,011
2021
21,067 8,727 2,990
2022
21,418 8,806 2,958
2023
21,844 8,755 2,913
2024-2028 109,746 45,783 13,362

~~Components of net periodic benefit cost and other supplemental information for the years ended December 1, 2018, December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016 are as follows:~~

Pension Benefits

Other

U.S. Plans

Non-U.S. Plans

Postretirement Benefits

Net periodic cost (benefit)

2018

2017

2016

2018

2017

2016

2018

2017

2016

Service cost
$ 56 $ 111 $ 110 $ 2,311 $ 2,125 $ 2,016 $ 173 $ 208 $ 342
Interest cost
12,251 15,836 15,360 4,671 4,709 5,465 1,484 1,593 1,956
Expected return on assets
(26,167 ) (25,458 ) (24,776 ) (11,105 ) (9,853 ) (9,919 ) (6,896 ) (5,788 ) (5,470 )
Amortization:

Prior service cost (benefit)
29 29 29 (4 ) (4 ) (3 ) - - (41 )
Actuarial loss
5,904 5,905 5,271 2,901 3,492 3,106 60 1,010 2,169
Curtailment loss
- - - - - 19 - - -
Settlement charge
- - - - 16 135 - - -
Net periodic (benefit) cost
$ (7,927 ) $ (3,577 ) $ (4,006 ) $ (1,226 ) $ 485 $ 819 $ (5,179 ) $ (2,977 ) $ (1,044 )

~~Table of Contents~~

Pension Benefits

Other

Weighted-average assumptions used to

U.S. Plans

Non-U.S. Plans

Postretirement Benefits

determine benefit obligations

2018

2017

2016

2018

2017

2016

2018

2017

2016

Discount rate
4.50 % 3.72 % 4.08 % 2.29 % 2.12 % 2.31 % 4.37 % 3.54 % 3.85 %
Rate of compensation increase¹
4.50 % 4.50 % 4.50 % 1.75 % 1.71 % 1.47 % N/A N/A N/A

Weighted-average assumptions used to
determine net costs for years ended	2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net costs for years ended																												2020			2019			2018			2020			2019			2018			2020			2019			2018
Discount rate		3.72	%		4.08	%		4.28	%		2.10	%		2.15	%		2.83	%		3.54	%		3.85	%		4.02	%		3.17	%		4.50	%		3.72	%		1.34	%		2.30	%		2.10	%		3.00	%		4.37	%		3.54	%
Expected return on plan assets		7.75	%		7.75	%		7.75	%		6.20	%		6.21	%		6.20	%		8.75	%		8.75	%		8.75	%		7.49	%		7.49	%		7.75	%		6.23	%		6.21	%		6.20	%		8.50	%		8.50	%		8.75	%
Rate of compensation increase¹		4.50	%		4.50	%		4.50	%		1.75	%		1.47	%		1.58	%		N/A			N/A			N/A			4.50	%		4.50	%		4.50	%		1.74	%		1.71	%		1.75	%		*N/A*			N/A			N/A

¹ Benefits under the U.S. Pension Plan were locked-in as of May 31, 2011 and no longer include compensation increases. The 4.50 percent rate for ~~2018, 2017~~2020,2019 and ~~2016 are~~2018 is for the supplemental executive retirement plan only.

The discount rate assumption is determined using an actuarial yield curve approach, which results in a discount rate that reflects the characteristics of the plan. The approach identifies a broad population of corporate bonds that meet the quality and size criteria for the particular plan. We use this approach rather than a specific index that has a certain set of bonds that may or may not be representative of the characteristics of our particular plan. A higher discount rate decreases the present value of the pension obligations. The discount rate for the U.S. pension plan was 2.53 percent at November 28, 2020, compared to 3.19 percent at November 30. 2019 and 4.51 percent at December 1, ~~2018, compared to 3.73 percent at December 2, 2017 and 4.10 percent at December 3, 2016.~~ 2018. Net periodic pension cost for a given fiscal year is based on assumptions developed at the end of the previous fiscal year. A discount rate ~~reduction~~change of 0.5 percentage points at ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 would ~~decrease~~impact U.S. pension and other postretirement plan (income) expense by approximately ~~$22~~$223 (pre-tax) in fiscal ~~2019.~~2021. Discount rates for non-U.S. plans are determined in a manner consistent with the U.S. plan.

For the U.S. Pension Plan, we adopted the Adjusted ~~RP-2014~~Pri-2012 base mortality ~~tables~~table projected generationally using scale ~~MP-2018.~~MP-2020.

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for the U.S. pension plan was 7.50 percent in 2020, 7.50 percent in 2019 and 7.75 percent in ~~2018, 2017 and 2016.~~2018. Our expected long-term rate of return on U.S. plan assets was based on our target asset allocation assumption of 60 percent equities and 40 percent fixed-income. Management, in conjunction with our external financial advisors, determines the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets by considering the expected future returns and volatility levels for each asset class that are based on historical returns and forward-looking observations. For ~~2018,~~2020, the expected long-term rate of return on the target equities allocation was ~~8.25~~8.00 percent and the expected long-term rate of return on the target fixed-income allocation was ~~5.6~~3.60 percent. The total plan rate of return assumption included an estimate of the effect of diversification and the plan expense. A change of 0.5 percentage points for the expected return on assets assumption would impact U.S. net pension and other postretirement plan expense by approximately ~~$2,147~~$2,538 (pre-tax).

Table of Contents

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for non-U.S. pension plans was a weighted-average of ~~6.20~~6.23 percent in ~~2018~~2020 compared to 6.21 percent in ~~2017~~2019 and 6.20 percent in ~~2016.~~2018. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption used in each non-U.S. plan is determined on a plan-by-plan basis for each local jurisdiction and is based on expected future returns for the investment mix of assets currently in the portfolio for that plan. Management, in conjunction with our external financial advisors, develops expected rates of return for each plan, considers expected long-term returns for each asset category in the plan, reviews expectations for inflation for each local jurisdiction, and estimates the effect of active management of the plan’s assets. Our largest non-U.S. pension plans are in the United Kingdom and ~~Germany, respectively.~~Germany. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for the United Kingdom was 6.75 percent and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for Germany was 5.75 percent. Management, in conjunction with our external financial advisors, uses actual historical returns of the asset portfolio to assess the reasonableness of the expected rate of return for each plan.

~~Table~~

Assumed health care trend rates	2020			2019			2018
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year		6.75	%		7.00	%		6.25	%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)		5.00	%		0.25	%		0.25	%
Fiscal year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate	2028			2028			2024

The asset allocation for the company’s U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans at the end of ~~Contents~~

2020 and 2019 follows.

Assumed health care trend rates

2018

2017

2016

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
6.25 % 6.50 % 6.75 %
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
0.25 % 5.00 % 5.00 %
Fiscal year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

2024

2024

2023

	U.S. Pension Plans									Non-U.S. Pension Plans									Other Postretirement Plans
	Target			Percentage of Plan Assets at Year-End						Target			Percentage of Plan Assets at Year-End						Target			Percentage of Plan Assets at Year-End
Asset Category	2020			2020			2019			2020			2020			2019			2020			2020			2019
Equities		60.0	%		55.4	%		57.7	%		49.6	%		48.8	%		49.6	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Fixed income		40.0	%		36.2	%		63.8	%		50.4	%		51.0	%		50.1	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Insurance		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		100.0	%		99.4	%		99.6	%
Cash ¹		0.0	%		8.4	%		-21.5	%		0.0	%		0.2	%		0.3	%		0.0	%		0.6	%		0.4	%
Total		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

~~The asset allocation for the company’s U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans at the end of 2018 and 2017 follows.~~

¹ Negative cash for 2019 represents unsettled pending trades within an investment that are classified in cash and cash equivalents until settled.

U.S. Pension Plans

Non-U.S. Pension Plans

Other Postretirement Plans

Target

Percentage of Plan
Assets at Year-End

Target

Percentage of Plan
Assets at Year-End

Target

Percentage of Plan Assets at Year-End

Asset Category

2018

2018

2017

2018

2018

2017

2018

2018

2017

Equities
60.0 % 59.5 % 63.3 % 49.0 % 50.8 % 51.5 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Fixed income
40.0 % 40.0 % 37.6 % 51.0 % 48.7 % 47.9 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
Insurance
0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 % 99.4 % 99.5 %
Cash
0.0 % 0.5 % (0.9 )% 0.0 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 0.0 % 0.6 % 0.5 %
Total
100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %

Plan Asset Management

Plan assets are held in trust and invested in mutual funds, separately managed accounts and other commingled investment vehicles holding U.S. and non-U.S. equity securities, fixed income securities and other investment classes. We employ a total return approach whereby a mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. Futures and options may also be used to enhance risk-adjusted long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification and duration. Risk management is accomplished through diversification across asset classes, utilization of multiple investment managers and general plan-specific investment policies. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of the plan liabilities, plan funded status and our assessment of our overall liquidity position. This asset allocation policy mix is reviewed annually and actual versus target allocations are monitored regularly and rebalanced on an as-needed basis. Plan assets are invested using a combination of active and passive investment strategies. Passive, or “indexed” strategies, attempt to mimic rather than exceed the investment performance of a market benchmark. The plans’ active investment strategies employ multiple investment management firms which in aggregate cover a range of investment styles and approaches. Performance is monitored and compared to relevant benchmarks on a regular basis.

Table of Contents

The U.S. pension plans consist of two plans: a pension plan and a supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”). There were no0 assets in the SERP in ~~2018~~2020 and ~~2017.~~2019. Consequently, all of the data disclosed in the asset allocation table for the U.S. pension plans pertain to our U.S. pension plan.

During ~~2018,~~2020, we maintained our assets within the allowed ranges of the target asset allocation mix of 60 percent equities and 40 percent fixed income plus or minus 5 percent and continued our focus to reduce volatility of plan assets in future periods and to more closely match the duration of the assets with the duration of the liabilities of the plan. ~~We plan to maintain the portfolio at this target allocation in 2019.~~

The non-U.S. pension plans consist of all the pension plans administered by us outside the U.S., principally consisting of plans in Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Canada. During ~~2018~~2020 we maintained our assets for the non-U.S. pension plans at the specific target asset allocation mix determined for each plan plus or minus the allowed rate and continued our focus to reduce volatility of plan assets in future periods and to more closely match the duration of the assets with the duration of the liabilities of the individual plans. We plan to maintain the portfolios at their respective target asset allocations in ~~2019.~~2021.

~~Table of Contents~~

Other postretirement benefits plans consist of two U.S. plans: a retiree medical health care plan and a group term life insurance plan. There were no0 assets in the group term life insurance plan for ~~2018~~2020 and ~~2017.~~2019. Consequently, all of the data disclosed in the asset allocation table for other postretirement plans pertain to our retiree medical health care plan. Our investment strategy for other postretirement benefit plans is to own insurance policies that maintain an asset allocation nearly completely in equities. These equities are invested in a passive portfolio indexed to the S&P 500. ~~Our large weighting to equities in these plans is driven by the investment options available and the relative underfunded status of the plans.~~

Fair Value of Plan Assets

The following table presents plan assets categorized within a ~~three-level~~three-level fair value hierarchy as described in Note 13.

	December 1, 2018								November 28, 2020
U.S. Pension Plans	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets
Equities	$	121,086	$	85,007	$	-	$	206,094	$	3,421	$	217,151	$	0	$	220,572
Fixed income		33,892		104,484		266		138,642		1,524		142,317		205		144,046
Cash		1,222		148		-		1,370
Cash ²										33,391		0		0		33,392
Total categorized in the fair value hierarchy		156,200		189,639		266		346,105		38,336		359,468		205		398,009
Other investments measured at NAV 1								354								394
Total	$	156,200	$	189,639	$	266	$	346,460	$	38,336	$	359,468	$	205	$	398,403

Non-U.S. Pension Plans	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets
Equities	$	30,123	$	1,073	$	-	$	31,196	$	33,478	$	1,368	$	0	$	34,846
Fixed income		44,158		6,394		662		51,214		49,813		7,182		770		57,765
Cash		450		-		-		450		352		0		0		352
Total categorized in the fair value hierarchy		74,731		7,467		662		82,860		83,643		8,550		770		92,963
Other investments measured at NAV 1								86,595								109,279
Total	$	74,731	$	7,467	$	662	$	169,455	$	83,643	$	8,550	$	770	$	202,242

Other Postretirement Benefits

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total Assets

Insurance
$ - $ - $ 82,446 $ 82,446
Cash
464 - - 464
Total
$ 464 $ - $ 82,446 $ 82,910

December 2, 2017

U.S. Pension Plans

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total Assets

Equities
$ 144,124 $ 95,542 $ - $ 239,666
Fixed income
42,310 99,252 291 141,853
Cash
(3,893 ) 126 - (3,767 )
Total categorized in the fair value hierarchy
182,541 194,920 291 377,752
Other investments measured at NAV 1
347
Total
$ 182,541 $ 194,920 $ 291 $ 378,099

Other Postretirement Benefits	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets
Insurance	$	0	$	0	$	108,406	$	108,406
Cash		650		0		0		650
Total	$	650	$	0	$	108,406	$	109,056

Table of Contents

	November 30, 2019
U.S. Pension Plans	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets
Equities	$	126,178		$	95,271	$	0	$	221,449
Fixed income		119,103			125,329		219		244,651
Cash		(83,099	)		140		0		(82,959	)
Total categorized in the fair value hierarchy		162,182			220,740		219		383,141
Other investments measured at NAV ¹									386
Total	$	162,182		$	220,740	$	219	$	383,527

Non-U.S. Pension Plans	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets
Equities	$	35,118	$	1,185	$	-	$	36,303	$	32,045	$	1,247	$	0	$	33,292
Fixed income		46,725		6,618		660		54,003		46,262		6,819		675		53,756
Cash		549		-		-		549		506		0		0		506
Total categorized in the fair value hierarchy		82,392		7,803		660		90,855		78,813		8,066		675		87,554
Other investments measured at NAV 1								96,853								97,777
Total	$	82,392	$	7,803	$	660	$	187,708	$	78,813	$	8,066	$	675	$	185,331

Other Postretirement Benefits	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Assets
Insurance	$	-	$	-	$	78,894	$	78,894	$	0	$	0	$	94,082	$	94,082
Cash		406		-		-		406		392		0		0		392
Total	$	406	$	-	$	78,894	$	79,300	$	392	$	0	$	94,082	$	94,474

¹~~In accordance with ASC Topic 820-10,~~

¹In accordance with ASC Topic 820-10, Fair Value Measurement, certain investments that are measured at NAV (Net Asset Value per share) (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts represented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.

² Negative cash for 2019 represents unsettled pending trades within an investment that are classified in cash and cash equivalents until settled.

The definitions of fair values of our pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets at ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017~~ November 30, 2019 by asset category are as follows:

Equities—Primarily publicly traded common stock for purposes of total return and to maintain equity exposure consistent with policy allocations. Investments include: (i) U.S. and non-U.S. equity securities and mutual funds valued at closing prices from national exchanges; and (ii) commingled funds valued at unit values or net asset values provided by the investment managers, which are based on the fair value of the underlying investments. Funds valued at net asset value have various investment strategies including seeking maximum total returns consistent with prudent investment management, seeking current income consistent with preservation of capital and daily liquidity and seeking to approximate the risk and return characterized by a specific index fund. There are no restrictions for redeeming holdings out of these funds and the funds have no unfunded commitments.

Fixed income—Primarily corporate and government debt securities for purposes of total return and managing fixed income exposure to policy allocations. Investments include (i) mutual funds valued at closing prices from national exchanges, (ii) corporate and government debt securities valued at closing prices from national exchanges, (iii) commingled funds valued at unit values or net asset value provided by the investment managers, which are based on the fair value of the underlying investments, and (iv) an annuity contract, the value of which is determined by the provider and represents the amount the plan would receive if the contract were cashed out at year-end.

Insurance—Insurance contracts for purposes of funding postretirement medical benefits. Fair values are the cash surrender values as determined by the providers which are the amounts the plans would receive if the contracts were cashed out at year end.

Table of Contents

Cash–Cash balances on hand, accrued income and pending settlements of transactions for purposes of handling plan payments. Fair values are the cash balances as reported by the Trustees of the plans.

The following is a roll forward of the Level 3 investments of our pension and postretirement benefit plan assets during the year ended ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017:~~November 30, 2019:

	Fixed Income						Fixed Income
U.S. Pension Plans	2018			2017			2020			2019
Level 3 balance at beginning of year	$	291		$	320		$	219		$	266
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net		(25	)		(29	)		(14	)		(47	)
Level 3 balance at end of year	$	266		$	291		$	205		$	219

	Fixed Income
Non-U.S. Pension Plans	2020			2019
Level 3 balance at beginning of year	$	675		$	662
Net transfers into / (out of) level 3		43			28
Net gains		(8	)		5
Currency change effect		60			(20	)
Level 3 balance at end of year	$	770		$	675

	Insurance
Other Postretirement Benefits	2020			2019
Level 3 balance at beginning of year	$	94,082		$	82,446
Net transfers into / (out of) level 3		(831	)		(403	)
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net		(822	)		(720	)
Net gains		15,977			12,759
Level 3 balance at end of year	$	108,406		$	94,082

~~Table of Contents~~

Fixed Income

Non-U.S. Pension Plans

2018

2017

Level 3 balance at beginning of year
$ 660 $ 569
Net transfers into / (out of) level 3
30 21
Net gains
6 3
Currency change effect
(34 ) 67
Level 3 balance at end of year
$ 662 $ 660

Insurance

Other Postretirement Benefits

2018

2017

Level 3 balance at beginning of year
$ 78,894 $ 66,064
Net transfers into / (out of) level 3
(422 ) (1,073 )
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net
(671 ) (570 )
Net gains
4,645 14,473
Level 3 balance at end of year
$ 82,446 $ 78,894

The difference between the change in the deferred tax assets in the balance sheet and the deferred tax provision is primarily due to the defined benefit pension plan adjustment and floating-to-fixed hedges recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Valuation allowances principally relate to foreign net operating loss carryforwards where the future potential benefits do not meet the ~~more-likely-than-not~~more-likely-than-not realization test. The increase in the valuation allowance relates primarily to current year net operating losses offor which the company does not expect to receive a tax benefit.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed ~~more-likely-than-not~~more-likely-than-not to be realized. We believe it is ~~more-likely-than-not~~more-likely-than-not that reversal of deferred tax liabilities and forecasted income will be sufficient to fully recover the net deferred tax assets not already offset by a valuation allowance. In the event that all or part of the gross deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made.

U.S. income taxes have not been provided on approximately ~~$636,513~~$936,607 of undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries. We intend to indefinitely reinvest these undistributed earnings. Cash available in the United States has historically been sufficient and we expect it will continue to be sufficient to fund U.S. cash flow requirements. In the event these earnings are later distributed to the U.S., such distributions would likely result in additional U.S. ~~tax that may be offset, at least in part, by associated foreign tax credits.~~tax.

While non-U.S. operations have been profitable overall, there are cumulative tax losses of ~~$100,389~~$115,550 in various countries. These tax losses can be carried forward to offset the income tax liabilities on future income in these countries. Cumulative tax losses of ~~$51,974~~$78,438 can be carried forward indefinitely, while the remaining ~~$48,415~~$37,112 of tax losses must be utilized during ~~2019~~2021 to ~~2036. The company also has $3,022 of tax effected losses in various states.~~2038.

The U.S. has a branch foreign tax credit carryforward of ~~$1,809. Projected~~$4,357. A valuation allowance has been recorded against this foreign ~~source income in future years~~tax credit carryforward to reflect that this amount is ~~sufficient~~not more-likely-than-not to ~~utilize these credits in the carryforward period.~~be realized.

The table below sets forth the changes to our gross unrecognized tax benefit as a result of uncertain tax positions, excluding accrued ~~interest, for the fiscal years ended December 1, 2018, and excluding accrued interest for the fiscal year ended December 2, 2017.~~interest. We do not anticipate that the total unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next twelve months.

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of ~~December 1, 2018,~~ November 28, 2020 and November 30, 2019 are potential benefits of ~~$5,320~~$9,125 and $6,755, respectively, that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.

We report accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. For the year ended ~~December 1, 2018,~~ November 28, 2020, we recognized a net ~~expense~~benefit for interest and penalties of ~~$571~~$2,378 relating to unrecognized tax benefits and had net accumulated accrued interest and penalties of ~~$1,190~~$3,520 as of ~~December 1, 2018.~~ November 28, 2020. For the year ended ~~December 2, 2017,~~ November 30, 2019, we recognized a net benefit for interest and penalties of ~~$111~~$59 relating to unrecognized tax benefits and had net accumulated accrued interest and penalties of ~~$626~~$1,142 as of ~~December 2, 2017.~~November 30, 2019.

We are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in numerous state and foreign jurisdictions. WeApart from the 2012 and 2013 U.S. federal audits discussed below, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examination for years prior to ~~2012~~2017, or Swiss income tax examination for years prior to ~~2012.~~2015. During 2015, the U.S. tax authorities opened an audit for the years ended December 1, 2012 and November 30, 2013. These audits have been principally settled but remain open only for matters to be addressed by the U.S.~~, Canada~~ and Mexican authorities in competent authority. During the second quarter of 2016, H.B. Fuller (China) Adhesives, Ltd. was notified of a transfer pricing audit covering the calendar years 2005 through 2014. We are in various stages of examination and appeal in ~~several states and~~ other foreign jurisdictions. Although the final outcomes of these examinations cannot currently be determined, we believe that we have recorded adequate liabilities with respect to these examinations.

Note 13:13: Fair Value Measurements

Overview

Estimates of fair value for financial assets and liabilities are based on the framework established in the accounting guidance for fair value measurements. The framework defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The framework discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The framework utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

●

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

●

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

●

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s assumptions, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

Balances Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents information about our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017,~~ November 30, 2019, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value.

			Fair Value Measurements Using:								Fair Value Measurements Using:
	December 1,								*November 28,*
Description	2018		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		*2020*		*Level 1*		*Level 2*		*Level 3*
Assets:
Marketable securities	$	11,436	$	11,436	$	-	$	-	$	22,560	$	22,560	$	0	$	0
Foreign exchange contract assets		4,933		-		4,933		-		2,320		0		2,320		0
Interest rate swaps, cash flow hedges		28,924		-		28,924		-
Cross-currency cash flow hedges		739		-		739		-
Cross-currency cash flow hedge assets										2,823		0		2,823		0

Liabilities:
Foreign exchange contract liabilities	$	2,156	$	-	$	2,156	$	-	$	5,251	$	0	$	5,251	$	0
Interest rate swaps, fair value hedges		8,657		-		8,657		-
Cross-currency cash flow hedge liabilities										280		0		280		0
Interest rate swaps, cash flow hedge liabilities										33,256		0		33,256		0
Contingent consideration liability										5,800		0		0		5,800

Table of Contents

Fair Value Measurements Using:

December 2,

Description

2017

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets:

Marketable securities
$ 7,528 $ 7,528 $ - $ -
Foreign exchange contract assets
600 - 600 -
Interest rate swaps, cash flow hedges
3,104 - 3,104 -

Liabilities:

Foreign exchange contract liabilities
$ 4,397 $ - $ 4,397 $ -
Interest rate swaps, fair value hedges
2,121 - 2,121 -
Cross-currency cash flow hedges
20,136 - 20,136 -
Contingent consideration liability
496 - - 496

			Fair Value Measurements Using:
	*November 30,*
Description	*2019*		*Level 1*		*Level 2*		*Level 3*
Assets:
Marketable securities	$	19,430	$	19,430	$	0	$	0
Foreign exchange contract assets		1,227		0		1,227		0
Interest rate swaps, cash flow hedges		5,741		0		5,741		0
Cross-currency cash flow hedges		26,896		0		26,896		0

Liabilities:
Foreign exchange contract liabilities	$	1,800	$	0	$	1,800	$	0
Interest rate swaps, fair value hedges		17,637		0		17,637		0

See Note 67 for discussion regarding the fair value of debt.

We use the income approach in calculating the fair value of our contingent consideration liability using a real option model with Level 3 inputs. The expected cash flows are affected by various significant judgments and assumptions, including revenue growth rates, volatility and discount rate, which are sensitive to change. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectation regarding future developments. These estimates and the judgments and assumptions upon which the estimates are based will, in all likelihood, differ in some respects from actual future results. The valuation of our contingent consideration liability related to the acquisition of D.H.M. resulted in a fair value of $5,800 with an adjustment recorded to selling, general and administrative expenses in the Statement of Income as of November 28, 2020.

Contingent consideration liability	2020
Level 3 balance at beginning of year	$	0
Acquisition		5,000
Mark to market adjustment		800
Level 3 balance at end of year	$	5,800

See Note 2 for further discussion regarding our acquisitions.

Note 14: Commitments and Contingencies

~~Leases~~

~~The minimum lease payments, related to buildings, equipment and vehicles, that are expected to be made in each of the years indicated based on operating leases in effect at December 1, 2018 are:~~

Fiscal Year

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023 and
Beyond

Total Minimum Lease
Payments

Operating Leases
$ 13,141 $ 8,028 $ 5,210 $ 3,950 $ 6,868 $ 37,197

Rent expense for all operating leases, which includes minimum lease payments and other charges such as common area maintenance fees, was $20,620, $15,199 and $12,884 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Environmental Matters

From time to time, we become aware of compliance matters relating to, or receive notices from, federal, state or local entities regarding possible or alleged violations of environmental, health or safety laws and regulations. We review the circumstances of each individual site, considering the number of parties involved, the level of potential liability or our contribution relative to the other parties, the nature and magnitude of the hazardous substances involved, the method and extent of remediation, the estimated legal and consulting expense with respect to each site and the time period over which any costs would likely be incurred. Also, from time to time, we are identified as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and/or similar state laws that impose liability for costs relating to the clean up of contamination resulting from past spills, disposal or other release of hazardous substances. We are also subject to similar laws in some of the countries where current and former facilities are located. Our environmental, health and safety department monitors compliance with applicable laws on a global basis. To the extent we can reasonably estimate the amount of our probable liabilities for environmental matters, we establish an undiscounted financial provision. We recorded liabilities of ~~$10,665~~$8,099 and ~~$11,380~~$8,535 as of ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017,~~ November 30, 2019, respectively, for probable and reasonably estimable environmental remediation costs. Of the amount reserved, ~~$4,784~~$3,703 and ~~$5,000~~$4,117 as of ~~December 1, 2018~~ November 28, 2020 and ~~December 2, 2017,~~ November 30, 2019, respectively, is attributable to a facility we own in Simpsonville, South Carolina as a result of our Royal Adhesives acquisition that is a designated site under CERCLA.

Currently we are involved in various environmental investigations, clean up activities and administrative proceedings and lawsuits. In particular, we are currently deemed a PRP in conjunction with numerous other parties, in a number of government enforcement actions associated with landfills and/or hazardous waste sites. As a PRP, we may be required to pay a share of the costs of investigation and clean up of these sites. In addition, we are engaged in environmental remediation and monitoring efforts at a number of current and former operating facilities. While uncertainties exist with respect to the amounts and timing of the ultimate environmental liabilities, based on currently available information, we have concluded that these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.

Table of Contents

Other Legal Proceedings

From time to time and in the ordinary course of business, we are a party to, or a target of, lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including product liability, personal injury, contract, patent and intellectual property, environmental, health and safety, tax and employment matters. While we are unable to predict the outcome of these matters, we have concluded, based upon currently available information, that the ultimate resolution of any pending matter, individually or in the aggregate, including the asbestos litigation described in the following paragraphs, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.

We have been named as a defendant in lawsuits in which plaintiffs have alleged injury due to products containing asbestos manufactured more than 3035 years ago. The plaintiffs generally bring these lawsuits against multiple defendants and seek damages (both actual and punitive) in very large amounts. In many cases, plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate that they have suffered any compensable injuries or that the injuries suffered were the result of exposure to products manufactured by us. We are typically dismissed as a defendant in such cases without payment. If the plaintiff presents evidence indicating that compensable injury occurred as a result of exposure to our products, the case is generally settled for an amount that reflects the seriousness of the injury, the length, intensity and character of exposure to products containing asbestos, the number and solvency of other defendants in the case, and the jurisdiction in which the case has been brought.

A significant portion of the defense costs and settlements in asbestos-related litigation is paid by third parties, including indemnification pursuant to the provisions of a 1976 agreement under which we acquired a business from a third party. Currently, this third party is defending and paying settlement amounts, under a reservation of rights, in most of the asbestos cases tendered to the third party.

In addition to the indemnification arrangements with third parties, we have insurance policies that generally provide coverage for asbestos liabilities, including defense costs. Historically, insurers have paid a significant portion of our defense costs and settlements in asbestos-related litigation. However, certain of our insurers are insolvent. We have entered into cost-sharing agreements with our insurers that provide for the allocation of defense costs and settlements and judgments in asbestos-related lawsuits. These agreements require, among other things, that we fund a share of settlements and judgments allocable to years in which the responsible insurer is insolvent.

A summary of the number of and settlement amounts for asbestos-related lawsuits and claims is as follows:

	Year Ended		Year Ended		Year Ended		Year Ended		Year Ended		Year Ended
	December 1,		December 2,		December 3,		November 28,		November 30,		December 1,
	2018		2017		2016		2020		2019		2018
Lawsuits and claims settled		7		9		14		4		8		7
Settlement amounts	$	390	$	1,673	$	1,360	$	130	$	424	$	390
Insurance payments received or expected to be received	$	281	$	1,365	$	884	$	88	$	291	$	281

We do not believe that it would be meaningful to disclose the aggregate number of asbestos-related lawsuits filed against us because relatively few of these lawsuits are known to involve exposure to asbestos-containing products that we manufactured. Rather, we believe it is more meaningful to disclose the number of lawsuits that are settled and result in a payment to the plaintiff. To the extent we can reasonably estimate the amount of our probable liabilities for pending asbestos-related claims, we establish a financial provision and a corresponding receivable for insurance recoveries.

Based on currently available information, we have concluded that the resolution of any pending matter, including asbestos-related litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.

Table of Contents

During 2018, we retained legal counsel to conduct an internal investigation of the possible resale of our hygiene products into Iran by certain customers of our subsidiaries in Turkey (beginning in ~~2011)~~2011) and India (beginning in ~~2014)~~2014), in possible violation of the economic sanctions against Iran administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets (“OFAC”) and our compliance policy. The sales to these customers represented less than one percent of our net revenue in ~~each of our last three~~the 2018 fiscal ~~years.~~year. The sales to the customers who were reselling our products into Iran ceased during fiscal year 2018 and we do not currently conduct any business in Iran. In January 2018, we voluntarily contacted OFAC to advise it of this internal investigation and our intention to cooperate fully with OFAC and, in September 2018, we submitted the results and findings of our investigation to OFAC. ~~We have not yet~~In December 2020, we received ~~a response~~formal notification from ~~OFAC. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome or effect~~OFAC that it had completed its review of the company’s investigation ~~however, based on~~and voluntary disclosure and that OFAC has decided to issue a Cautionary Letter instead of pursuing a civil monetary penalty or taking other enforcement action. While OFAC has indicated that future enforcement action is not precluded if additional information warrants renewed attention, the ~~results of~~Cautionary Letter represents OFAC’s final enforcement response to our investigation ~~to date,~~and voluntary disclosure, so we ~~believe we could incur penalties ranging from zero to $10,000.~~now consider this matter closed.

~~Table of Contents~~

Note 15~~: Operating~~15: Segments

We are required to report segment information in the same way that we internally organize our business for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources. For segment evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, segment operating income is identified as gross profit less SG&A expenses. Corporate expenses are fully allocated to each operating segment. Corporate assets are not allocated to the operating segments. Inter-segment revenues are recorded at cost plus a markup for administrative costs. Operating results of each of these segments are regularly reviewed by our chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and assess their performance.

~~For the year ended December 2, 2017,~~ As of November 30, 2019, we had ~~six~~five reportable segments: Americas Adhesives, EIMEA, Asia Pacific, Construction Adhesives ~~Engineering Adhesives~~ and ~~Royal~~Engineering Adhesives. As of the beginning of fiscal ~~2018, in connection with the integration of the operations of Royal Adhesives with the Company’s other segments,~~2020, we ~~modified~~realigned our operating segment structure ~~by allocating the Royal~~and now have three reportable segments: Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives, ~~segment into each of the five other segments. We began reporting results in five segments for the quarter ended March 3, 2018: Americas Adhesives, EIMEA, Asia Pacific, Construction~~Engineering Adhesives and ~~Engineering~~Construction Adhesives. The change in operating segments is based on how we have organized the company to make operating decisions and assess business performance. Prior period segment information has been recast retrospectively to reflect the realignment.

The business components within each operating segment are managed to maximize the results of the overall operating segment rather than the results of any individual business component of the operating segment. Results of individual components of each operating segment are subject to numerous allocations of segment-wide costs that may or may not have been focused on that particular component for a particular reporting period. The costs for these allocated resources are not tracked on a “where-used” basis as financial performance is assessed at the total operating segment level.

~~Table of Contents~~

Reportable operating segment financial information for all periods presented is as follows:

	2018		2017			2016		2020			2019			2018
Net revenue
Americas Adhesives	$	1,099,918	$	907,765		$	806,062
EIMEA		738,553		568,658			545,135
Asia Pacific		278,079		264,692			241,827
Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives								$	1,332,786		$	1,328,286		$	1,375,562
Engineering Adhesives									1,088,313			1,158,403			1,186,533
Construction Adhesives		446,101		260,330			256,346		369,170			396,580			454,149
Engineering Adhesives		478,351		304,598			245,235
Corporate Unallocated									0			13,731			24,758
Total	$	3,041,002	$	2,306,043		$	2,094,605	$	2,790,269		$	2,897,000		$	3,041,002

Inter-segment sales
Americas Adhesives	$	18,717	$	15,943		$	16,064
EIMEA		19,765		19,153			19,165
Asia Pacific		6,952		6,498			4,716

Segment operating income
Americas Adhesives	$	115,363	$	91,198		$	121,998
EIMEA		40,060		18,821			40,121
Asia Pacific		17,995		14,826			15,410
Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives								$	130,789		$	115,961		$	120,513
Engineering Adhesives									103,974			136,299			119,391
Construction Adhesives		32,917		(12,975	)		3,265		11,148			16,657			39,111
Engineering Adhesives		48,427		16,170			17,390
Corporate Unallocated									(27,594	)		(42,923	)		(41,124	)
Total	$	254,762	$	128,040		$	198,184	$	218,317		$	225,994		$	237,891

Depreciation and amortization
Americas Adhesives	$	39,558	$	22,999		$	18,979
EIMEA		32,184		21,071			21,441
Asia Pacific		8,483		8,162			7,484
Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives								$	44,329		$	45,448		$	46,171
Engineering Adhesives									58,102			57,175			59,773
Construction Adhesives		37,885		18,656			14,977		35,811			35,851			35,625
Engineering Adhesives		27,015		16,427			14,804
Corporate Unallocated									575			2,732			3,557
Total	$	145,125	$	87,315		$	77,685	$	138,817		$	141,206		$	145,126

Total assets¹
Americas Adhesives	$	1,092,622	$	1,188,027
EIMEA		782,831		837,313
Asia Pacific		272,735		289,191
Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives								$	1,268,236		$	1,253,864
Engineering Adhesives									1,515,302			1,610,748
Construction Adhesives		843,847		867,574					934,397			799,995
Engineering Adhesives		855,189		880,310
Corporate		328,047		310,828					318,769			321,127
Total	$	4,175,271	$	4,373,243				$	4,036,704		$	3,985,734

Capital expenditures
Americas Adhesives	$	28,983	$	19,022
EIMEA		16,407		16,110
Asia Pacific		5,005		4,910
Hygiene, Health and Consumable Adhesives								$	57,416		$	44,583
Engineering Adhesives									18,212			5,896
Construction Adhesives		4,876		4,369					7,635			6,421
Engineering Adhesives		2,534		2,484
Corporate		10,458		8,039					12,580			6,654
Total	$	68,263	$	54,934				$	95,843		$	63,554

¹Segment assets include primarily inventory, accounts receivable, property, plant and equipment, goodwill, intangible assets and other miscellaneous assets. Corporate assets include primarily corporate property, plant and equipment, deferred tax assets, certain investments and other assets.

Table of Contents

Reconciliation of segment operating income to income before income taxes and income from equity method investments:

~~Reconciliation of segment operating income to income before income taxes and income from equity method investments:~~

	2018			2017			2016			2020			2019			2018
Segment operating income	$	254,762		$	128,040		$	198,184		$	218,317		$	225,994		$	237,891
Special charges, net		-			-			168
Other income (expense), net		1,184			(27,667	)		(9,594	)
Other income, net											15,398			37,943			18,055
Interest expense		(110,994	)		(43,701	)		(27,359	)		(86,776	)		(103,287	)		(110,994	)
Interest income		11,774			3,927			2,045			11,417			12,178			11,774
Income before income taxes and income from equity method investments	$	156,726		$	60,599		$	163,444		$	158,356		$	172,828		$	156,726

Financial information about geographic areas

	Net Revenue						Net Revenue
	2018		2017		2016		2020		2019		2018
United States	$	1,374,147	$	969,346	$	869,919	$	1,248,495	$	1,309,056	$	1,374,147
China		343,960		302,009		257,779		351,204		347,304		343,960
Germany								330,755		0		0
Countries with more than 10 percent of total		1,718,107		1,271,355		1,127,698		1,930,454		1,656,360		1,718,107
All other countries with less than 10 percent of total		1,322,895		1,034,688		966,907		859,815		1,240,640		1,322,895
Total	$	3,041,002	$	2,306,043	$	2,094,605	$	2,790,269	$	2,897,000	$	3,041,002

Property, Plant and Equipment, net

2018

2017

2016

United States
$ 286,639 $ 212,078 $ 202,944
Germany
137,677 149,269 99,229
China
77,861 83,808 83,548
All other countries with less than 10 percent of total
134,371 225,039 129,554
Total
$ 636,548 $ 670,194 $ 515,275

~~Note 16~~: ~~Quarterly Data~~ ~~(unaudited)~~

2018

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Net revenue
$ 713,079 $ 789,387 $ 770,107 $ 768,429
Gross profit
187,705 222,385 217,204 209,600
Selling, general and administrative expenses ¹
(151,020 ) (145,199 ) (146,069 ) (139,844 )
Net income including non-controlling interests
$ 47,667 $ 44,464 $ 37,736 $ 41,365
Basic Income per share
$ 0.94 $ 0.88 $ 0.75 $ 0.82
Diluted Income per share
$ 0.92 $ 0.86 $ 0.72 $ 0.79

Weighted-average common shares outstanding1

Basic
50,471 50,551 50,632 50,712
Diluted
51,898 51,846 52,138 52,017

	Property, Plant and Equipment, net
	2020		2019		2018
United States	$	297,046	$	287,372	$	286,639
Germany		131,879		127,497		137,677
China		99,513		80,606		77,861
All other countries with less than 10 percent of total		142,306		134,338		134,372
Total	$	670,744	$	629,813	$	636,549

Table of Contents

The adjusted EBITDA information presented below does not conform to U.S. GAAP and should not be construed as an alternative to the reported results determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain adjustments. Management has included this non-GAAP information to assist in understanding the operating performance of the company and its operating segments. Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income attributable to H.B. Fuller, the most directly comparable financial measure determined and reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

	November 28, 2020			November 30, 2019			December 1, 2018

Adjusted EBITDA
Hygiene Health and Consumable Adhesives	$	182,448		$	166,685		$	174,410
Engineering Adhesives		167,915			197,853			183,929
Construction Adhesives		51,692			56,514			77,680
Unallocated		4,754			11,293			12,734
Total		406,809			432,345			448,753

Adjusted items:
Adjustments		25,190			22,849			(15,246	)
Interest expense		84,619			103,287			110,624
Interest income		(11,417	)		(12,178	)		(11,774	)
Income taxes		46,456			47,465			49,541
Depreciation and amortization expense		138,242			140,105			144,400
Total		283,090			301,528			277,545

Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller	$	123,719		$	130,817		$	171,208

We view the following disaggregation of net revenue by geographic region as useful to understanding the composition of revenue recognized during the respective reporting periods:

	November 28, 2020
	Hygiene, Health
	and Consumable		Engineering		Construction		Corporate
	Adhesives		Adhesives		Adhesives		Unallocated		Total
Americas	$	736,681	$	430,866	$	325,622	$	0	$	1,493,169
EIMEA		388,271		347,417		20,506		0		756,194
Asia Pacific		207,834		310,030		23,042		0		540,906
	$	1,332,786	$	1,088,313	$	369,170	$	0	$	2,790,269

2017 ²

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Net revenue
$ 503,323 $ 561,651 $ 562,869 $ 678,200
Gross profit
139,630 146,527 150,125 168,788
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(112,915 ) (102,770 ) (110,219 ) (151,126 )
Net income including non-controlling interests
$ 15,223 $ 26,167 $ 24,969 $ (6,893 )
Basic Income per share
$ 0.30 $ 0.52 $ 0.50 $ (0.14 )
Diluted Income per share
$ 0.30 $ 0.51 $ 0.48 $ (0.13 )

Weighted-average common shares outstanding¹

Basic
50,243 50,496 50,384 50,356
Diluted
51,460 51,686 51,605 51,724

Table of Contents

	November 30, 2019
	Hygiene, Health
	and Consumable		Engineering		Construction		Corporate
	Adhesives		Adhesives		Adhesives		Unallocated		Total
Americas	$	733,125	$	469,764	$	351,924	$	13,731	$	1,568,544
EIMEA		392,497		380,673		20,767		0		793,937
Asia Pacific		202,664		307,966		23,889		0		534,519
	$	1,328,286	$	1,158,403	$	396,580	$	13,731	$	2,897,000

¹ ~~Quarterly income per share amounts may not equal full year amounts due to rounding.~~

² ~~Amounts have been adjusted retrospectively for the change in accounting principle as discussed in Note 1.~~

	December 1, 2018
	Hygiene, Health
	and Consumable		Engineering		Construction		Corporate
	Adhesives		Adhesives		Adhesives		Unallocated		Total
Americas	$	744,096	$	476,322	$	403,765	$	24,758	$	1,648,941
EIMEA		424,521		416,906		24,630		0		866,057
Asia Pacific		206,945		293,305		25,754		0		526,004
	$	1,375,562	$	1,186,533	$	454,149	$	24,758	$	3,041,002

Note 16: Quarterly Data (unaudited)

	2020
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
Net revenue	$	646,564		$	674,602		$	691,463		$	777,640
Gross profit		170,262			184,901			187,844			213,642
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(141,509	)		(127,998	)		(129,113	)		(139,712	)
Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller	$	9,895		$	31,613		$	41,607		$	40,604
Basic earnings per share¹	$	0.19		$	0.61		$	0.80		$	0.78
Diluted earnings per share¹	$	0.19		$	0.61		$	0.79		$	0.77

*Weighted-average common shares outstanding*
Basic		51,295			51,420			52,130			52,276
Diluted		52,580			52,029			52,591			52,879

	2019
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4
Net revenue	$	672,935		$	759,583		$	725,376		$	739,106
Gross profit		179,925			218,459			207,321			201,217
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(145,713	)		(146,079	)		(140,615	)		(148,521	)
Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller	$	12,244		$	36,641		$	49,718		$	32,214
Basic earnings per share¹	$	0.24		$	0.72		$	0.98		$	0.63
Diluted earnings per share¹	$	0.24		$	0.70		$	0.97		$	0.61

*Weighted-average common shares outstanding*
Basic		50,752			50,902			50,939			51,089
Diluted		51,901			52,105			51,502			52,423

¹ Quarterly earnings per share amounts may not equal full year amounts due to rounding.

Table of Contents

Note 17:Subsequent Event

Acquisition

On January 15, 2021, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of STR Holdings, Inc. for a base purchase price of $6,300. STR Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Enfield, Connecticut, is a manufacturer of encapsulant products used in the solar industry. The acquisition will be included in our Engineering Adhesives operating segment.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and ~~Financ~~~~ial~~Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

~~Disclosure Controls and Procedures~~

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)). Based on its evaluation, our management concluded that, as of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective (1) to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) to ensure that information require to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to us, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~Table of Contents~~

Management has concluded that the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 1, 2018 and December 2, 2017 and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 1, 2018 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of ~~December 1, 2018.~~November 28, 2020. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective. ~~KPMG~~Ernst and Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an auditors’ report on ~~management’s assessment of~~ our internal control over financial reporting as of ~~December 1, 2018,~~November 28, 2020, which is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information under the headings “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors”, ~~“Section~~“Delinquent Section 16(a) ~~Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”,~~Reports” and “Corporate Governance - Audit Committee” contained in the company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April ~~4, 2019~~8, 2021 (the ~~“2019~~“2021 Proxy Statement”) is incorporated herein by reference.

The information contained at the end of Item 1. hereof under the heading ~~“Executive Officers of the Registrant”~~“Information About Our Executive Officers” is incorporated herein by reference.

Since the date of our ~~2018~~2020 Proxy Statement, there have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

The company has a code of business conduct applicable to all of its directors and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and other employees performing similar functions. A copy of the code of business conduct is available under the Investor Relations section of the company’s website at ~~www.hbfuller.com.~~www.hbfuller.com. The company intends to disclose on its website information with respect to any amendment to or waiver from a provision of its code of business conduct that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and other employees performing similar functions within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation” and “CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure” contained in the ~~2019~~2021 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” contained in the ~~2019~~2021 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

The information under the headings “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance - Director Independence” contained in the ~~2019~~2021 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information under the heading “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting ~~Firm”~~Firms” contained in the ~~2019~~2021 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)	Documents filed as part of this report:

	1.	Consolidated Financial Statements

		Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018.

		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018.

		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 28, 2020 and November 30, 2019.

		Consolidated Statements of Total Equity for the fiscal years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018.

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended November 28, 2020, November 30, 2019 and December 1, 2018.

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

~~Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended December 1, 2018, December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016.~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the fiscal years ended December 1, 2018, December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016.~~

~~Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 1, 2018 and December 2, 2017.~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Total Equity for the fiscal years ended December 1, 2018, December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016.~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 1, 2018, December 2, 2017 and December 3, 2016.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~

~~2. Financial Statement Schedules~~

~~All financial statement schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.~~

Table of Contents

~~3. Exhibits~~

	2.	Financial Statement Schedules

		All financial statement schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

Exhibits

		Item				Incorporation by Reference

~~1.1~~	Underwriting Agreement, dated February 9, 2017, among H.B. Fuller Company and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as representatives of the several Underwriters set forth in Schedule A thereto		~~Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2017.~~

~~2.1~~	Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2014, by and among H.B. Fuller Singapore, Pte, Ltd., ZHAI Haichao, individually and as Sellers’ Representative, WANG Bing, LIN Xinsong, LI Yimbai and Beijing Gongchuang Mingtian Investment Advisory Co.		~~Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 24, 2014.~~

~~2.2~~	~~Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2017, by and among H.B. Fuller Company, HBF Windsor Holding Co., ASP Royal Acquisition Corp., and ASP Royal Holdings LLC~~		~~Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 2, 2017.~~

3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of H.B. Fuller Company, as amended				Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 2, 2006 and Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2016.

3.2		By-Laws of H.B. Fuller Company				Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 2, 2015.

4.1		Form of Certificate for common stock, par value $1.00 per share				Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended November 28, 2009.

4.2		~~Note Purchase Agreement, dated December 16, 2009, among H.B. Fuller Company, as borrower, and various financial institutions, as amended~~			Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 16, 2009, and Exhibit 1.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2012 and Exhibit 1.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2014.

~~4.3~~	~~Note Purchase Agreement, dated March 5, 2012, by and among H.B. Fuller Company and the purchasers party thereto, as amended~~		~~Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2012 and Exhibit 1.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2014.~~

~~4.4~~	Indenture, dated February 14, 2017, between H.B. Fuller Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee			Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2017.

~~4.5~~4.3		First Supplemental Indenture, dated February 14, 2017, between H.B. Fuller Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.0000% Notes due 2027				Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2017.

~~4.6~~4.4		Amendment No. 1 to First Supplemental Indenture, dated February 14, 2017 between H.B. Fuller Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.0000% Notes due 2027				Exhibit 4.6 to the Current Report on Form 10-K dated January 31, 2018.

4.5		Second Supplemental Indenture, dated October 20, 2020, between H.B. Fuller Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.250% Notes due 2028.				Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2020.

~~4.7~~4.6		Form of Global Note representing the 4.000% Notes due 2027 (included in Exhibit ~~4.5)~~4.3)				Exhibit ~~4.3~~4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2017.

4.7		Form of Global Note representing the 4.250% Notes due 2028 (included in Exhibit 4.5)				Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2020.

4.8		Description of Securities				Exhibit 4.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K dated January 24, 2020.

Table of Contents

10.1	Credit Agreement, dated October 31, 2014, by and among JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, U.S. Bank National Association, Citibank, N.A. and Morgan Stanley MUFG Loan Partners, LLC, as co-syndication agents, and various financial institutions	Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2014.

10.2	Credit Agreement dated as of April 12, 2017 among (i) H.B. Fuller Company, a Minnesota corporation, as Borrower, (ii) certain of its subsidiaries party thereto as Foreign Subsidiary Borrowers, (iii) JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, (iv) U.S. Bank National Association, Citibank, N.A., and Morgan Stanley MUFG Loan Partners, LLC, as Co-Syndication Agents, (v) Bank of America, N.A., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, and PNC Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents, and (vi) various other financial institutions party thereto as Lenders, as amended	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2017, Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 29, 2017, and Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 17, 2017.

~~Table of Contents~~


10.3	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated October 20, 2020, among H.B. Fuller Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and the various other parties named thereto.	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2020.

10.4	Guaranty made as of April 12, 2017 by H.B. Fuller Construction Products Inc., a Minnesota corporation as Initial Guarantor, in favor of J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent	Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2017.

~~10.4~~10.5	Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of October 20, 2017, by and among H.B. Fuller Company, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as administrative agent, and various other financial institutions party thereto as lenders,, as amended	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2017 and Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 10-Q dated September 28, 2018.

~~10.5~~10.6	Commitment Letter, dated as of September 2, 2017, by and among H.B. Fuller Company and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc.	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 2, 2017.

*~~10.6~~10.7	Amended and Restated H.B. Fuller Company Year 2000 Stock Incentive Plan	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2006.

*~~10.7~~10.8	H.B. Fuller Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan II – 2008, as amended	Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2007, Exhibit 10.5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 29, 2008 and Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 28, 2011.

*~~10.8~~10.9	H.B. Fuller Company Executive Benefit Trust dated October 25, 1993 between H.B. Fuller Company and U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee, as amended, relating to the H.B. Fuller Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan	Exhibit 10(k) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 29, 1997, Exhibit 10(k) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K405 for the year ended November 28, 1998, Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2007 and Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 30, 2009.

Table of Contents

*~~10.9~~10.10		H.B. Fuller Company Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (2005 Amendment and Restatement), as amended		Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 1, 2007 and Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 29, 2008.

*10.11		Third Amendment of the H.B. Fuller Company Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (2005 Amendment and Restatement), as amended

*~~10.10~~10.12		Form of Change in Control Agreement between H.B. Fuller Company and each of its executive officers		Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 29, 2008.

*10.13		Form of Change-in-Control Agreement between H.B. Fuller Company and each of its executive officers for agreements entered into after January 24, 2019		Exhibit 10.9 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 24, 2019.

*~~10.11~~10.14		Form of Severance Agreement between H.B. Fuller Company and each of its executive officers		Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2008.

*10.12	~~Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated H.B. Fuller Company Year 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for awards made between December 4, 2008 and December 2, 2009~~		~~Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2008.~~

*10.13	~~Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated H.B. Fuller Company Year 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for awards made on or after December 3, 2009~~		~~Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 3, 2009.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

10.1410.15	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated H.B. Fuller Company Year 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 20, 2011			Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 20, 2011.

*~~10.15~~10.16		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated H.B. Fuller Company Year 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 26, 2012			Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 26, 2012

*~~10.16~~10.17		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated H.B. Fuller Company Year 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 24, 2013			Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 24, 2013.

*~~10.17~~10.18		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2013 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 23, 2014			Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 23, 2014.

*10.18	~~Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2013 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 19, 2016~~		~~Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 19, 2016.~~

*10.19		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2016 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 7, 2016			Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 6, 2016.

*10.20		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2016 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 7, 2016			Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 6, 2016.

*10.21		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for the CEO under the H.B. Fuller Company 2016 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 7, 2016			Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 6, 2016.

Table of Contents

*10.22	Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2016 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 7, 2016	Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 6, 2016.

*10.23	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the H.B. Fuller Company 2016 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 7, 2016	Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 6, 2016.

*10.24	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2016 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after October 20, 2017	Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2017.

*10.25	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 12, 2018	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 2018.

*10.26	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 12, 2018	Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 2018.

~~Table of Contents~~


*10.27		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for the CEO under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 12, 2018		Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 2018.

*10.28		Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 12, 2018		Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 2018.


*10.29	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 12, 2018		Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 2018.

*10.30		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 24, 2019		Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 24, 2019.

*10.31		Form of Performance-Based Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 24, 2019		Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 24, 2019.

*10.32		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 24, 2019		Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 24, 2019.

*10.33		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the CEO under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 24, 2019		Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 24, 2019.

*10.34		Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 24, 2019		Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 24, 2019.

Table of Contents

*10.35	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after January 24, 2019	Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 24, 2019.

*10.36	Form of Performance-Based Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2016 Master Incentive Plan, as amended	Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 2019 and Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 2019.

*10.37	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2020 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 2, 2020	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 2, 2020.

*10.38	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2020 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 2, 2020	Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 2, 2020.

*10.39	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for the CEO under the H.B. Fuller Company 2020 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 2, 2020	Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 2, 2020.

*10.40	Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the H.B. Fuller Company 2020 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 2, 2020	Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 2, 2020.

*10.41	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the H.B. Fuller Company 2020 Master Incentive Plan for awards made on or after April 2, 2020	Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 2, 2020.

*10.42	H.B. Fuller Company Defined Contribution Restoration Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2008), as amended	Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2007 and Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2008. Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 2, 2019, and Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 1, 2019.

*10.43	Fourth Amendment of the H.B. Fuller Company Defined Contribution Restoration Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2008), as amended

*~~10.31~~10.44	H.B. Fuller Company Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (2008 Amendment and Restatement), as amended	Exhibit 10.22 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 29, 2008 and Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 29, 2008.

*~~10.32~~10.45	H.B. Fuller Company 2009 Director Stock Incentive Plan	Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 30, 2009.

Table of Contents

*~~10.33~~10.46	H.B. Fuller Company Management Short-Term Incentive Plan for Executive Officers	Exhibit ~~10.1~~10.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January ~~19, 2016.~~

*10.34	~~H.B. Fuller Company Management Short-Term Incentive Plan for Executive Officers (as revised on October 12, 2016)~~	~~Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2016.~~24, 2019.

10.3510.47	H.B. Fuller Company Management Short-Term Incentive Plan for Executive Officers	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January ~~26, 2017.~~15, 2020.

10.36 10.48	H.B. Fuller Company Management Long-Term Incentive Plan	Exhibit ~~10.2~~10.8 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January ~~19, 2016.~~24, 2019.

10.37 10.49	Amended and Restated H.B. Fuller Company Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 3, 2008

10.38 10.50	H.B. Fuller Company 2013 Master Incentive Plan	Annex B to the H.B. Fuller Company Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2013.

10.39 10.51	H.B. Fuller Company 2016 Master Incentive Plan	Annex B to the H.B. Fuller Company Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2016.

10.40 10.52	H.B. Fuller Company 2018 Master Incentive Plan	Annex B to the H.B. Fuller Company Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2018.

*~~10.41~~10.53	~~Employment Agreement between H.B. Fuller Europe GmbH and Patrick M. Kivits fully executed on December 21, 2017~~	~~Exhibit 10.40 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 2, 2017.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

18		~~Preferability Letter provided by KPMG LLP, the Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm, to change in accounting principle~~H.B. Fuller Company 2020 Master Incentive Plan	Annex B to the H.B. Fuller Company Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2020.

21		List of Subsidiaries

23.1		Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

23.2		Consent of KPMG LLP

24		Power of Attorney

2331.1		~~Consent of KPMG LLP~~302 Certification – James J. Owens

2431.2		~~Power of Attorney~~302 Certification – John J. Corkrean

~~31.1~~32.1		~~302~~906 Certification – James J. Owens

~~31.2~~32.2		~~302~~906 Certification – John J. Corkrean

~~32.1~~		~~906 Certification – James J. Owens~~

~~32.2~~		~~906 Certification – John J. Corkrean~~

101		The following materials from the H.B. Fuller Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~December 1, 2018~~November 28, 2020 formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language ~~(XBRL)~~(Inline XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, ~~(Loss),~~ (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Total Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
	*
		* Asterisked items are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed.

Table of Contents

(b)	See Exhibit Index and Exhibits attached to this Form 10-K.

~~(b)~~

~~See Exhibit Index and Exhibits attached to this Form 10-K.~~

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None

99
95

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	H.B. FULLER COMPANY

	By:	/s/ James J. Owens
Dated: January 26, 2021		JAMES J. OWENS
		President and Chief Executive Officer

~~Dated: January 28, 2019~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature				Title
/s/ James J. Owens				President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
JAMES J. OWENS				(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ John J. Corkrean				Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
JOHN J. CORKREAN				(Principal Financial Officer)


/s/ Robert J. Martsching		Vice President, Controller
ROBERT J. MARTSCHING		(Principal Accounting Officer)

*		Director
DANIEL L. FLORNESS

*		Director
~~DANIEL L. FLORNESS~~ THOMAS W. HANDLEY

*		Director
~~THOMAS W. HANDLEY~~MICHAEL J. HAPPE

*		Director
MARIA TERESA HILADO

*		~~Director~~
~~RUTH S. KIMMELSHUE~~

*	Director
~~J. MICHAEL LOSH~~ RUTH S. KIMMELSHUE

*		Director
LEE R. MITAU

*				Director
DANTE C. PARRINI

*				Director
TERESA J. RASMUSSEN
				Director
*
JOHN C. VAN RODEN, JR.

*				Director
R. WILLIAM VAN SANT

* by /s/ Timothy J. Keenan
				Director
* by /s/ Timothy J. Keenan
TIMOTHY J. KEENAN, Attorney in Fact
Dated: January 26, 2021

~~Dated: January 28, 2019~~

~~100~~

Minnesota		41-0268370
~~(State~~(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

1200 Willow Lake Boulevard, St. Paul, Minnesota		55110-5101
~~(Address~~(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

~~Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:~~ ~~(651) 236-5900~~
~~Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:~~
Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $1.00 ~~per share~~	FUL	New York Stock Exchange

Large accelerated filer ☒	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐

Name	Age	Positions	Period Served

James J. Owens	5456	President and Chief Executive Officer	November 2010 - Present

Zhiwei Cai	5658	~~Senior~~Executive Vice President, Engineering Adhesives ~~Vice President, TONSAN and Electronics~~ ~~Director, Electronics Materials~~	~~February 2016~~August 2019 - Present ~~2014 - 2016~~ ~~2012 - 2014~~

~~Heather A. Campe~~	45	Senior Vice President, ~~Americas~~Engineering Adhesives	February 2016 - August 2019
		Vice President, ~~Asia Pacific~~ TONSAN and Electronics	~~October 2016 - Present~~ ~~2013~~2014 - 2016

Theodore M. Clark	6567	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer	August 2019 - Present
		Senior Vice President, Royal Adhesives	October 2017 - August 2019
		President and CEO of Royal Adhesives and Sealants, LLC	~~October 2017 - Present~~ 2003 - 2017

~~Paula M. Cooney~~	50	~~Vice President, Human Resources~~ ~~Director, Global Human Resources Strategic Programs~~	~~April 2016 - Present~~ ~~2010 - 2016~~

John J. Corkrean	5355	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	May 2016 - Present
		Senior Vice President, Finance - Global Energy Services, NALCO Champion, an Ecolab Inc.	2014 - 2016
		company (supplier of chemicals and related services to the oil ~~and~~& gas industry)	~~2014~~

PART I
Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	12
Item 2.	Properties	12
~~Item 3.~~	~~Legal Proceedings~~	13
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	14
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	1514

PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	1514
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	16
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3734
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	3936
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	9287
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	9287
Item 9B.	Other Information	9387

PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	9388
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	9388
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	9488
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	9488
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	9488

PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	9488
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	9995
	Signatures	~~100~~96

Traci L. Jensen	54	Vice President, Global Business Process Improvement	December 2019 - ~~2016~~Present
		Senior Vice President, ~~and Corporate Controller, Ecolab Inc. (global provider of water, hygiene and energy technologies and services)~~Construction Products	~~2008~~July 2016 - ~~2014~~December 2019

~~Dietrich J. Crail~~	48	~~Vice President, Asia Pacific~~	~~October 2016 - Present~~
		~~Vice President, Paper Converting and Construction, Henkel Corporation (global manufacturer of adhesives, sealants and surface treatments)~~	~~2013 - 2016~~
		~~Vice President and Global Segment Leader, Pressure Sensitive Adhesives, Henkel Corporation~~	~~2008 - 2014~~

~~Traci L. Jensen~~	52	~~Senior Vice President, Global Construction Adhesives~~ Senior Vice President, Americas Adhesives	~~July 2016 - Present~~ January 2013 - July 2016

Timothy J. Keenan	6163	Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary	December 2006 - Present

~~Patrick~~ M. ~~Kivits~~Shahbaz Malik	5153	Senior Vice President, ~~EIMEA~~Construction Adhesives	~~Corporate~~ December 2019 - Present
		Vice President and ~~General Manager, Henkel~~Business Leader, North America Distribution, Masonite International Corporation (global residential doors business)	2018 - 2019
		Senior Vice President, Sales, Marketing and Supply Chain, Continental Building Products, Inc. (North America manufacturer of ~~adhesives, sealants~~wallboard and ~~surface treatments)~~ joint compound materials)	~~September 2015~~2014 - ~~Present~~ ~~2013 - 2015~~

~~David W. Moorman~~	50	~~Vice President, Operations Excellence~~ ~~Director, Global Information Technology~~	~~March 2017 - Present~~ ~~2010 - 2017~~ 2018

~~Ebrahim Rezai~~Andrew E. Tometich	6754	Executive Vice President, Hygiene, Health and ~~Chief Technology and Innovation Officer~~Consumable Adhesives	~~October 2016~~September 2019 - Present
		~~Associate Director, Baby~~Senior Vice President, Specialty Materials, Corning Incorporated (global company specializing in specialty glass, ceramics, and ~~Feminine Care Global Material Development~~related materials and ~~Supply Organization, Procter~~technologies)	2017 - 2019
		President, Performance Silicones, The Dow Chemical Company (a global sustainable materials science company)	2016 - 2017
		Senior Vice President, Silicones, Dow Corning Corporation (joint venture between The Dow Chemical Company and ~~Gamble (multinational manufacturer of family, personal and household care products)~~Corning Incorporated)	~~2015~~2014 - 2016
		~~Associate~~
Nathanial D. Weaver	45	Vice President, Human Resources	March 2020 - Present
		Director, ~~Baby Care~~Human Resources	2017 - March 2020
		Vice President, Global ~~Material Development and Supply Organization, Procter and Gamble~~Hygiene	~~2005~~2013 - ~~2015~~2017

Segment	Manufacturing Sq Ft		Segment	Manufacturing Sq Ft
Americas Adhesives			EIMEA
California - Roseville		82,202	Egypt - 6th of October City		8,525
Georgia - Covington		73,500	France - Blois		48,438
- Tucker		69,000	- Surbourg		21,743
- Dalton		21,980	Germany - Lueneburg		64,249
Illinois - Seneca		24,621	- Nienburg		139,248
- Elgin - River Ridge¹		35,239	- Pirmasens²		48,438
- Elgin - Executive		30,000	Germany - Langelsheim¹		123,353
- Huntley²		29,000	- Pirmasens		81,278
Indiana - South Bend		128,218	Greece - Lamia		11,560
Kentucky - Paducah		252,500	India - Pune		38,782
Ohio - Blue Ash		102,000	Italy - Pianezze		36,500
Michigan - Grand Rapids		65,689	Portugal - Mindelo		90,193
Minnesota - Fridley¹		15,850	Kenya - Nairobi¹		5,262
- Vadnais Heights		53,145	United Kingdom - Dukinfield		17,465
New Jersey - Wayne¹		16,000	EIMEA Total		735,034
New York - Syracuse¹		23,000
South Carolina - Simpsonville		23,722	Asia Pacific
Texas - Mesquite		25,000	Australia - Dandenong South		43,540
Washington - Vancouver		35,768	- Sydney ¹		12,968
Argentina - Buenos Aires		10,367	People's Republic of China - Guangzhou		36,055
Brazil - Sorocaba²		7,535	- Nanjing		55,224
- Curitiba¹		9,896	- Nanjing¹		62,430
- Guarulhos		32,292	Indonesia - Mojokerto		52,991
Chile - Maipu, Santiago		7,539	Malaysia - Selongor		21,900
Colombia - Rionegro		17,072	New Zealand - Auckland¹		7,330
Americas Adhesives Total		1,191,135	Philippines - Manila		9,295
			Vietnam - Binh Duong¹		26,156
Construction Adhesives			Asia Pacific Total		327,889
California - La Mirada		15,206
Canada - Ontario¹		63,020	Engineering Adhesives
- Toronto¹		25,172	California - Irvine¹		15,120
Florida - Gainesville		6,800	- Wilmington¹		26,373
Georgia - Dalton		72,000	People's Republic of China - Beijing		78,120
Illinois - Aurora		149,000	- Beijing¹		42,044
- Palatine²		55,000	- Suzhou		73,622
Michigan - Michigan Center		115,000	- Yantai		23,890
New Jersey - Edison		9,780	Germany - Wunstorf		16,146
Ohio - Chagrin Falls		16,500	Georgia - Norcross¹		39,727
Pennsylvania - Fairless Hills		19,229	- Ball Ground¹		4,800
Texas - Eagle Lake		26,000	Illinois - Batavia¹		19,169
- Houston		11,000	Illinois - Frankfort - Corsair		12,500
- Mansfield		28,790	- Frankfort - West Drive		17,000
Construction Adhesives Total		612,497	Massachusetts - Peabody¹		40,000
			New Hampshire - Raymond¹		12,950
1 Leased Property			United Kingdom - Preston¹		34,000
2 Idle Property			Engineering Adhesives Total		455,461

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased¹		(b) Average Price Paid per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Plan or Program		(d) Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plan or Program (thousands)

September 2, 2018 - October 6, 2018		2,057	$	53.42		-	$	187,170

October 7, 2018 - November 3, 2018		297	$	45.62		-	$	187,170

November 4, 2018 - December 1, 2018		254	$	48.24		-	$	187,170

¹ The total number of shares purchased include shares withheld to satisfy employees’ withholding taxes upon vesting of restricted stock.

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Plan or Program		(d) Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plan or Program (thousands)

August 29, 2020 - October 3, 2020		-	$	-		-	$	187,170

October 4, 2020 - October 31, 2020		-	$	-		-	$	187,170

November 1, 2020 - November 28, 2020		-	$	-		-	$	187,170

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Fiscal Years												Fiscal Years
		2018		2017 ⁴		2016 ^2,4		2015 ^3,4		2014⁴	2020		2019		2018			2017 ³		2016 ^1,2,3
Net revenue	$	3,041,002	$	2,306,043	$	2,094,605	$	2,083,660	$	2,104,454	$	2,790,269	$	2,897,000	$	3,041,002	$	2,306,043	$	2,094,605

Net income including non-controlling interests¹	$	171,232	$	59,466	$	121,917	$	84,287	$	51,112	$	123,788	$	130,844	$	171,232	$	59,466	$	121,917
Percent of net revenue		5.6		2.6		5.8		4.0		2.4		4.4		4.5		5.6		2.6		5.8
Total assets	$	4,175,271	$	4,373,243	$	2,066,565	$	2,056,930	$	1,890,323	$	4,036,704	$	3,985,734	$	4,176,314	$	4,373,243	$	2,066,565
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities	$	2,141,532	$	2,398,927	$	585,759	$	669,606	$	547,735	$	1,756,985	$	1,898,384	$	2,141,532	$	2,398,927	$	585,759
Total H.B. Fuller stockholders' equity	$	1,151,767	$	1,051,424	$	944,497	$	882,006	$	899,133


Per Common Share:

Basic	$	3.38	$	1.18	$	2.43	$	1.68	$	1.02	$	2.38	$	2.57	$	3.38	$	1.18	$	2.43
Diluted	$	3.29	$	1.15	$	2.37	$	1.64	$	1.00	$	2.36	$	2.52	$	3.29	$	1.15	$	2.37

Dividends declared and paid	$	0.615	$	0.590	$	0.550	$	0.510	$	0.460	$	0.648	$	0.635	$	0.615	$	0.590	$	0.550
Book value⁵	$	22.70	$	20.85	$	18.84	$	17.61	$	17.87

Number of employees		6,479		5,965		4,587		4,425		3,650

¹ ~~2016, 2015 and 2014 include~~ ¹2016 includes after-tax charges of $(0.2) million ~~$4.7 million and $45.2 million, respectively,~~ related to special charges, net. ² 2016 contained 53 weeks. ³Amounts have been adjusted retrospectively for changes in accounting principles.
² ~~2016 contained 53 weeks.~~
³ ~~Amounts have been adjusted retroactively for discontinued operations.~~
⁴ ~~Amounts have been adjusted retrospectively for the change in accounting principle as discussed in Item 7.~~
⁵ ~~Book value is calculated by dividing total H.B. Fuller stockholders' equity by the number of common stock shares outstanding as of our fiscal year end.~~

U.S. Pension Plan Historical actual rates of return	Total Portfolio			Equities			Fixed Income
U.S. Pension Plan Historical Actual Rates of Return										Total Portfolio			Equities			Fixed Income

10-year period		10.5	%		12.0	%		7.3	%		9.1	%		9.0	%		8.6	%
20-year period		8.6	%		8.3	%		7.0	%*		9.5	%		9.3	%		8.7	%*

Results of Operations

Net revenue

($ in millions)	2018		2017		2016		2018 vs 2017			2017 vs 2016
Net revenue	$	3,041.0	$	2,306.0	$	2,094.6		31.9	%		10.1	%

	2018 vs 2017			2017 vs 2016
Constant currency growth		23.9	%		12.8	%
Currency		(2.7	)%		(0.2	)%
Total		21.2	%		12.6	%

~~CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS~~
H.B. Fuller Company and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	H.B. Fuller Company Shareholders																		H.B. Fuller Company Shareholders														`
	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Non- Controlling Interest			Total			Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Non- Controlling Interest		Total
Balance at November 28, 2015, as previously reported	$	50,074		$	55,522		$	994,608		$	(227,284	)	$	406		$	873,326
Change in accounting principle		-			-			9,086			-			-			9,086
Balance at November 28, 2015, as adjusted¹	$	50,074		$	55,522		$	1,003,694		$	(227,284	)	$	406		$	882,412
Comprehensive income (loss)¹		-			-			121,663			(35,445	)		226			86,444
Dividends		-			-			(27,836	)		-			-			(27,836	)
Stock option exercises		519			10,750			-			-			-			11,269
Share-based compensation plans other, net		116			14,485			-			-			-			14,601
Tax benefit on share-based compensation plans		-			1,467			-			-			-			1,467
Repurchases of common stock		(568	)		(22,660	)		-			-			-			(23,228	)
Redeemable non-controlling interest		-			-			-			-			(239	)		(239	)
Balance at December 3, 2016¹	$	50,141		$	59,564		$	1,097,521		$	(262,729	)	$	393		$	944,890
Comprehensive income¹		-			-			59,418			62,074			39			121,531
Dividends		-			-			(29,911	)		-			-			(29,911	)
Stock option exercises		514			17,191			-			-			-			17,705
Share-based compensation plans other, net		165			17,203			-			-			-			17,368
Tax benefit on share-based compensation plans		-			2,010			-			-			-			2,010
Repurchases of common stock		(431	)		(21,400	)		-			-			-			(21,831	)
Purchase of redeemable non-controlling interest		-			94			-			-			-			94
Redeemable non-controlling interest		-			-			-			-			(39	)		(39	)
Balance at December 2, 2017¹	$	50,389		$	74,662		$	1,127,028		$	(200,655	)	$	393		$	1,051,817
Balance at December 2, 2017																			$	50,389		$	74,662		$	1,127,028		$	(200,655	)	$	393	$	1,051,817
Comprehensive income (loss)		-			-			171,208			(61,156	)		8			110,060			0			0			171,208			(61,156	)		8		110,060
Dividends		-			-			(31,331	)		-			-			(31,331	)		0			0			(31,331	)		0			0		(31,331	)
Stock option exercises		199			6,038			-			-			-			6,237			199			6,038			0			0			0		6,237
Share-based compensation plans other, net		237			19,836			-			-			-			20,073			237			19,836			0			0			0		20,073
Repurchases of common stock		(92	)		(4,596	)		-			-			-			(4,688	)		(92	)		(4,596	)		0			0			0		(4,688	)
Reclassification of AOCI tax effects		-			-			18,341			(18,341	)		-			-			0			0			18,341			(18,341	)		0		0
Balance at December 1, 2018	$	50,733		$	95,940		$	1,285,246		$	(280,152	)	$	401		$	1,152,168
Balance at December 1, 2018, as previously reported																			$	50,733		$	95,940		$	1,285,246		$	(280,152	)	$	401	$	1,152,168
Change in accounting principle																				0			0			1,043			0			0		1,043
Balance at December 1, 2018, as adjusted																				50,733			95,940			1,286,289			(280,152	)		401		1,153,211
Comprehensive income (loss)																				0			0			130,817			(63,448	)		41		67,410
Dividends																				0			0			(32,695	)		0			0		(32,695	)
Stock option exercises																				373			10,506			0			0			0		10,879
Share-based compensation plans other, net																				200			26,810			0			0			0		27,010
Repurchases of common stock																				(65	)		(2,961	)		0			0			0		(3,026	)
Balance at November 30, 2019																			$	51,241		$	130,295		$	1,384,411		$	(343,600	)	$	442	$	1,222,789
Comprehensive income																				0			0			123,719			40,741			99		164,559
Dividends																				0			0			(33,724	)		0			0		(33,724	)
Stock option exercises																				397			11,924			0			0			0		12,321
Share-based compensation plans other, net																				341			19,008			0			0			0		19,349
Repurchases of common stock																				(72	)		(3,360	)		0			0			0		(3,432	)
Balance at November 28, 2020																			$	51,907		$	157,867		$	1,474,406		$	(302,859	)	$	541	$	1,381,862

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS of CASH FLOWS~~
H.B. Fuller Company and Subsidiaries
(In thousands)

	As of December 2, 2017
Current assets	$	102,454
Non-current assets		27,732
Current liabilities		40,173
Non-current liabilities		1,583

	For the year ended December 2, 2017
Net revenue	$	171,302
Gross profit		50,607
Net income		17,735

For the fiscal years ended:
	December 2, 2017									December 3, 2016
	As reported			Impact of change to weighted- average cost			As adjusted			As reported			Impact of change to weighted- average cost			As adjusted

Cost of sales	$	(1,702,873	)	$	1,900		$	(1,700,973	)	$	(1,484,802	)	$	(3,981	)	$	(1,488,783	)
Gross profit		603,170			1,900			605,070			609,803			(3,981	)		605,822
Income taxes		(9,086	)		(724	)		(9,810	)		(50,436	)		1,516			(48,920	)

Net income including non-controlling interests		58,290			1,176			59,466			124,382			(2,465	)		121,917

Net income attributable to H. B. Fuller		58,242			1,176			59,418			124,128			(2,465	)		121,663

Earnings per share attributable to H.B. Fuller common stockholders:
Basic	$	1.16		$	0.02		$	1.18		$	2.48		$	(0.05	)	$	2.43
Diluted		1.13			0.02			1.15			2.42			(0.05	)		2.37

	Preliminary Valuation December 2, 2017			Fair Value Adjustments			Final Valuation December 1, 2018
Current assets	$	17,877		$	(1,740	)	$	16,137
Property, plant and equipment		7,308			739			8,047
Goodwill		23,282			(1,881	)		21,401
Other intangibles
Customer relationships		17,016			(383	)		16,633
Trademarks/trade names		1,363			(65	)		1,298
Other assets		4,811			-			4,811
Current liabilities		(12,765	)		(1,509	)		(14,274	)
Other liabilities		(14,210	)		502			(13,708	)
Total purchase price	$	44,682		$	(4,337	)	$	40,345

	Preliminary Valuation December 2, 2017			Adjustments			Final Valuation December 1, 2018
Accounts receivable	$	64,904		$	992		$	65,896
Inventory		93,680			(195	)		93,485
Other current assets		58,508			789			59,297
Property, plant and equipment		126,192			(7,409	)		118,783
Goodwill		866,013			1,730			867,743
Other intangibles
Developed technology		59,800			(100	)		59,700
Customer relationships		645,300			19,400			664,700
Trademarks/trade names		53,600			22,600			31,000
Other assets		1,443			(43	)		1,400
Accounts payable		(40,211	)		1,452			(38,759	)
Other current liabilities		(37,261	)		3,778			(33,483	)
Other liabilities		(269,240	)		(183	)		(269,423	)
Total purchase price	$	1,622,728		$	(2,389	)	$	1,620,339

	Preliminary Valuation			Purchase Price and Fair Value			Final Valuation
	March 4, 2017			Adjustments			December 2, 2017
Current assets	$	13,729		$	115		$	13,844
Property, plant and equipment		10,516			(1,875	)		8,641
Goodwill		60,313			(487	)		59,826
Other intangibles
Customer relationships		33,300			12,000			45,300
Trademarks/trade names		13,600			(9,200	)		4,400
Current liabilities		(8,153	)		(309	)		(8,462	)
Total purchase price	$	123,305		$	244		$	123,549

	Employee-												Employee-
	Related			Asset-Related			Other			Total			Related			Asset-Related			Other			Total
Balance at December 3, 2016	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Balance at end December 1, 2018													$	4,256		$	0		$	0		$	4,256
Expense incurred		10,266			5,394			2,371			18,031			9,140			1,929			3,466			14,535
Non-cash charges		-			(4,291	)		-			(4,291	)		0			(968	)		0			(968	)
Cash payments		(9,210	)		(1,103	)		(2,351	)		(12,664	)		(3,494	)		(961	)		(2,542	)		(6,997	)
Foreign currency translation		430			-			-			430			(72	)		0			0			(72	)
Balance at end December 2, 2017	$	1,486		$	-		$	20		$	1,506
Balance at end November 30, 2019													$	9,830		$	0		$	924		$	10,754
Expense incurred		6,223			2,353			305			8,881			2,898			0			1,681			4,579
Non-cash charges		-			(1,666	)		-			(1,666	)
Cash payments		(3,395	)		(687	)		(325	)		(4,407	)		(7,051	)		0			(2,357	)		(9,408	)
Foreign currency translation		(58	)		-			-			(58	)		157			0			0			157
Balance at end December 1, 2018	$	4,256		$	-		$	-		$	4,256
Balance at end November 28, 2020													$	5,834		$	0		$	248		$	6,082

							2020			2019
Inventories	2018			2017
Raw materials	$	169,228		$	174,093		$	151,026		$	150,338
Finished goods		186,335			198,009			172,187			186,929
Total inventories	$	355,563		$	372,102		$	323,213		$	337,267

Other current assets
Other receivables	$	26,542		$	24,304		$	18,666		$	26,258
Prepaid income taxes		31,899			41,105			22,137			23,112
Prepaid taxes other than income taxes		16,718			20,852			20,270			16,836
Prepaid expenses		19,161			29,521			19,212			20,862
Assets held for sale		1,337			1,607			828			3,655
Total other current assets	$	95,657		$	117,389		$	81,113		$	90,723

Property, plant and equipment
Land	$	79,745		$	79,993		$	87,403		$	79,631
Buildings and improvements		369,072			364,048			393,175			362,114
Machinery and equipment		815,084			787,844			876,858			808,154
Construction in progress		39,689			56,402			70,747			54,332
Total, at cost		1,303,590			1,288,287			1,428,183			1,304,231
Accumulated depreciation		(667,041	)		(618,093	)		(757,439	)		(674,418	)
Net property, plant and equipment	$	636,549		$	670,194		$	670,744		$	629,813

Other assets
Investments and company owned life insurance	$	8,596		$	8,602		$	9,006		$	8,870
Equity method investments		51,454			48,962			53,863			53,696
Cost method investments		1,669			1,669
Equity investments								1,669			1,667
Long-term deferred income taxes		27,112			43,422			37,376			29,037
Prepaid pension costs		37,881			30,145			43,206			28,759
Prepaid postretirement other than pension		48,872			39,163			73,137			58,307
Operating lease right-of-use assets								28,445			0
Other long-term receivables		46,755			18,577			16,760			46,887
Other long-term assets		15,329			16,444			14,751			14,129
Total other assets	$	237,668		$	206,984		$	278,213		$	241,352

Other accrued expenses
Taxes other than income taxes	$	16,592		$	18,753		$	16,893		$	15,031
Miscellaneous services		7,694			13,565			5,691			5,541
Customer rebates		10,082			10,114			15,008			11,293
Interest		5,996			6,766			4,901			4,572
Insurance		401			5,668			184			178
Product liability		1,249			961			501			978
Contingent consideration liability		3,610			-			0			3,400
Current operating lease liabilities								8,706			0
Accrued expenses		30,164			28,398			32,092			19,752
Total other accrued expenses	$	75,788		$	84,225		$	83,976		$	60,745

Other liabilities
Asset retirement obligations	$	3,646		$	2,129		$	2,948		$	2,952
Long-term deferred income taxes		214,295			280,515			165,877			177,530
Long-term income tax liability								18,089			10,088
Long-term deferred compensation		5,974			5,424			8,510			6,929
Postretirement other than pension		2,603			2,992			2,930			2,879
Contingent consideration liability		-			496
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities								19,498			0
Long-term accrued payroll tax								7,216			0
Environmental liabilities		5,183			11,380			3,639			4,657
Other long-term liabilities		33,067			43,445			50,212			37,155
Total other liabilities	$	264,768		$	346,381		$	278,919		$	242,190

	December 1, 2018													November 28, 2020
	H.B. Fuller Stockholders									Non-controlling Interests				H.B. Fuller Stockholders									Non-controlling Interest
	Pretax			Tax			Net			Net				Pretax			Tax			Net			Net
Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller and non-controlling interests		-			-		$	171,208		$	24				-			-		$	123,719		$	69
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation adjustment¹	$	(71,222	)		-			(71,222	)		(16	)		$	41,712			-			41,712			30
Reclassification to earnings:
Defined benefit pension plans adjustment²		(3,671	)		701			(2,970	)		-				5,823			(1,235	)		4,588			-
Interest rate swap³		25,819			(6,048	)		19,771			-				(15,618	)		3,853			(11,765	)		-
Other cash flow hedges³		(4,047	)		(2,688	)		(6,735	)		-				6,307			(101	)		6,206			-
Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(53,121	)	$	(8,035	)		(61,156	)		(16	)
Other comprehensive income														$	38,224		$	2,517			40,741			30
Comprehensive income							$	110,052		$	8		Comprehensive income							$	164,460		$	99

	December 2, 2017
	Total			H.B. Fuller Stockholders			Non-controlling Interests
Foreign currency translation adjustment	$	(56,159	)	$	(56,084	)	$	(75	)
Interest rate swap, net of taxes of ($1,183)		1,922			1,922			-
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes of $3,276		(5,322	)		(5,322	)		-
Defined benefit pension plans adjustment, net of taxes of $74,382		(141,171	)		(141,171	)		-
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(200,730	)		(200,655	)		(75	)

	November 30, 2019
	Total			H.B. Fuller Stockholders			Non- controlling Interests
Foreign currency translation adjustment	$	(147,821	)	$	(147,716	)	$	(105	)
Interest rate swap, net of taxes of ($4,300)		(13,338	)		(13,338	)		0
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes of $21		1,763			1,763			0
Defined benefit pension plans adjustment, net of taxes of $81,891		(165,968	)		(165,968	)		0
Reclassification of AOCI tax effects		(18,341	)		(18,341	)		0
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(343,705	)	$	(343,600	)	$	(105	)

Amortizable Intangible Assets	Purchased Technology and Patents			Customer Relationships			Tradenames			All Other			Total			Purchased Technology and Patents			Customer Relationships			Tradename			All Other			Total
As of December 1, 2018
As of November 28, 2020
Original cost	$	118,930		$	953,929		$	65,975		$	33,550		$	1,172,384		$	113,775		$	933,943		$	63,266		$	11,410		$	1,122,394
Accumulated amortization		(41,503	)		(175,318	)		(21,573	)		(26,332	)		(264,726	)		(53,216	)		(279,586	)		(29,368	)		(4,775	)		(366,945	)
Net identifiable intangibles	$	77,427		$	778,611		$	44,402		$	7,218		$	907,658		$	60,559		$	654,357		$	33,898		$	6,635		$	755,449
Weighted-average useful lives (in years)		12			17			14			9			17			13			17			14			12			17

As of December 2, 2017
As of November 30, 2019
Original cost	$	132,495		$	968,060		$	76,159		$	34,417		$	1,211,131		$	109,967		$	913,968		$	62,537		$	27,453		$	1,113,925
Accumulated amortization		(27,478	)		(144,964	)		(14,688	)		(22,729	)		(209,859	)		(43,351	)		(223,563	)		(24,819	)		(23,273	)		(315,006	)
Net identifiable intangibles	$	105,017		$	823,096		$	61,471		$	11,688		$	1,001,272		$	66,616		$	690,405		$	37,718		$	4,180		$	798,919
Weighted-average useful lives (in years)		12			18			14			9			17			13			17			14			10			17

Fiscal Year		2019				2020				2021				2022				2023				Thereafter				2021				2022				2023				2024				2025				Thereafter
Amortization Expense		$	75,938			$	71,751			$	70,360			$	69,042			$	66,465			$	554,096			$	70,673			$	68,783			$	65,854			$	60,825			$	58,199			$	431,115

	November 28, 2020
Operating lease cost	$	12,581
Variable lease cost		4,024
Total net lease cost	$	16,605

	Location on
	Balance Sheet	November 28, 2020
Operating leases:
Operating lease right-of-use assets	Other assets	$	28,445
Current operating lease liabilities	Other accrued expenses		8,706
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities	Other liabilities		19,498
Total operating lease liabilities		$	28,204


	November 28, 2020
Cash paid amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	13,216

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating leases	$	13,166

Fiscal Year	Amount
2021	$	9,492
2022		6,517
2023		4,945
2024		3,200
2025		1,917
2026 and beyond		4,523
Total		30,594
Less: amounts representing interest		(2,390	)
Present value of future minimum payments		28,204
Less: current obligations		(8,706	)
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities	$	19,498