Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________________________ 
FORM 10-K
___________________________________________ 
(Mark One)
ý
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For Thethe Fiscal Year ended June 30, 20122015

¨Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from                      to                     .
Commission File No. 0-22818
___________________________________________ 
THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
___________________________________________ 
   
Delaware 22-3240619
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
  
58 South Service Road1111 Marcus Avenue
Melville,Lake Success, New York
 1174711042
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (631) 730-2200(516) 587-5000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

(Title of Each Class)Class (Name of Each Exchange on which registered)registered
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share 
The NASDAQ®NASDAQ® Global Select Market


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
___________________________________________ _______________________________________ 



Table of Contents



Indicate by check mark ifwhether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  ¨ ýNo  ý¨


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes  ¨ No  ý


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  ý    No  ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this



chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  ý    No  ¨


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to Form 10-K.                               ¨ý


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerýAccelerated filer¨
    
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).          Yes  ¨    No  ý


The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant based upon the
closing price of the registrant’s stock, as quoted on the NasdaqNASDAQ Global Select Market on December 31, 2011,2014, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $1,359,724,000.$5,841,951,000.

As of August 20, 201217, 2015 there were 44,955,920102,611,244 shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement for the 20122015 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC.
Table of Contents
 
 Part I - Financial InformationPage
PART I1  
   
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
   
PART II  
   
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
   
PartPART III  
   
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
   
PartPART IV 
   
Item 15.
   

 

12




PART I
THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC.


Item 1.        Business

Unless otherwise indicated, references in this Annual Report to 2012, 2011, 20102015, 2014, 2013 or “fiscal” 2012, 2011, 20102015, 2014, 2013 or other years refer to our fiscal year ended June 30 of that year and references to 20132016 or “fiscal” 20132016 refer to our fiscal year ending June 30, 2013.2016.


General
General
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on May 19, 1993. Our worldwide headquarters office is located at 58 South Service Road, Melville, New York 11747.
1111 Marcus Avenue, Lake Success, NY 11042.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company,” and herein referred to as “we,” “us,” and “our”) manufacture, market, distribute and sell naturalorganic and organicnatural products under brand names which are sold as “better-for-you” products, providing consumers with the opportunity to lead A HealthyHealthier Way of LifeTM. Our brand namesWe are wella leader in many organic and natural products categories, with many recognized brands in the various market categories they serve. We are a leader in many natural and organic products categories, with such well-known food brands as Earth's Best®Our brand names include Almond Dream®, Arrowhead Mills®, Bearitos®, BluePrint®, Celestial Seasonings®Seasonings®, Terra®Cully & Sully®, Danival®, DeBoles®, Earth’s Best®, Ella’s Kitchen®, Empire®, Europe’s Best®, Farmhouse Fare®, Frank Cooper’s®, FreeBird®, Gale’s®, Garden of Eatin'Eatin’®, Sensible Portions®GG UniqueFiberTM, Rice Dream®Hain Pure Foods®, Soy Dream®, Almond Dream®, Imagine®, WestSoy®, The Greek Gods®, Ethnic Gourmet®, Rosetto®, Arrowhead Mills®, MaraNatha®, SunSpire®Hartley’s®, Health Valley®Valley®, Spectrum Naturals®Imagine®, Spectrum Essentials®Johnson’s Juice Co.®, DeBoles®Joya®, Lima®Kosher Valley®, Danival®, GG UniqueFiber™, Yves Veggie Cuisine®, Europe's Best®Lima®, Linda McCartney®McCartney® (under license), MaraNatha®, Natumi®, New Covent Garden Soup Co.®, Johnson's Juice Co.Plainville Farms®, Farmhouse Fare®Rice Dream®, Robertson’s®, Rudi’s Gluten-Free Bakery®, Rudi’s Organic Bakery®, Sensible Portions®, Spectrum®, Spectrum Essentials®, Soy Dream®, Sun-Pat®, SunSpire®, Terra®, The Greek Gods®, Tilda®, Walnut Acres®, WestSoy® and Cully & Sully®Yves Veggie Cuisine®. Our well-known personal care products are marketed under the Alba Botanica®, Avalon Organics®Organics®, Alba Botanica®Earth’s Best®, JASON®JASON®, Live Clean® and Queen Helene® and Earth's Best TenderCare®Helene® brands.

Our mission is to be the leading marketer, manufacturer and seller of naturalorganic and organicnatural products by anticipating and exceeding consumer expectations in providing quality, innovation, value and convenience. We are committed to growing our Company sustainably while continuing to implement environmentally sound business practices and manufacturing processes.

We have acquired numerous companies and brands since our formation and intend to seek future growth through internal expansion as well as the acquisition of complementary brands. We consider the acquisition of organic, natural and organic food and personal care“better-for-you” products companies or product lines to be an integrala part of our business strategy. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012,2015, we acquired Belvedere International, Inc., (“Belvedere”) a leader in health and beauty care products including the Live Clean® brand with approximately 200 baby, body and hair care products as well as several mass market brands sold primarily in Canada. In addition, we had a minority investment in Hain Pure Protein Corporation (“HPPC”) through June 30, 2014. HPPC processes, markets and distributes antibiotic-free, organic and other poultry products. On July 17, 2014, we acquired the Daniels Groupremaining 51.3% of HPPC that we did not already own at which point HPPC became a wholly-owned subsidiary. Included in the United Kingdom,acquisition was HPPC’s 19% interest in EK Holdings, Inc. (“Empire”), which was previously recorded as an investment. On March 4, 2015, HPPC purchased the Europe's Best brandremaining 81% in CanadaEmpire that it did not already own, at which point Empire became a wholly owned subsidiary of HPPC and Cully & Sully in Ireland, which have significantly expanded our international operations.we began to consolidate the results of Empire. See Note 4, Acquisitions, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our operations are organized and managed by geography and are comprised of fourin five operating segments. See "Segments,"“Segments,” below.

Our business strategy within each operating segment is to integrate our brands under one management team and employ uniform
marketing, sales and distribution programs. We believe that by integrating our various brands, we will continue to achieve economies of scale and enhanced market penetration. We seek to capitalize on the equity of our brands and the distribution achieved through each of our acquired businesses with strategic introductions of new products that complement existing lines to enhance revenues and margins.

We have a minority investment in Hain Pure Protein Corporation (“HPP” or “Hain Pure Protein”), which processes, markets and distributes antibiotic-free chicken and turkey products. We also have an investment in a joint venture in Hong Kong with Hutchison China MeditechMediTech Ltd. ("Chi-Med"(“Chi-Med”), a majority owned subsidiary of CK Hutchison WhampoaHoldings Limited, a company listed on the Alternative Investment Market, a sub-market of the LondonHong Kong Stock Exchange, to market and distribute co-branded infant and toddler feeding products and market and distribute selectedcertain of the Company’s brands in China and other markets. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 13,14, Investments and Joint Ventures.Ventures, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of June 30, 2012,2015, we employed a total of 3,7206,307 full-time employees. Of these employees, 252232 were in sales and 2,3594,481 in production, with the remaining 1,1091,594 employees fillingin management, accounting,legal, finance, marketing, operations and clerical positions.


3



Products

Products
We primarily sell our organic, natural, and “better-for-you” products in five productthe following categories: grocery, snacks, tea,grocery; snacks; tea; personal carecare; and fresh.poultry. We continuously evaluate our existing products for quality, taste, nutritional value and cost and make improvements where possible. We discontinue products or stock keeping units (“SKUs”) when sales of those items do not warrant further production. Our product lines include natural products, products made with organic ingredients and certified organic products. Our five product categories consist of the following:

2


following:
Grocery

Grocery products include infant formula, infant, toddler and toddler food, non-dairykids foods, diapers and wipes, rice and grain-based products, plant-based beverages and frozen desserts (such as soy, rice, almond and coconut), flour and baking mixes, breads, hot and cold cereals, pasta, condiments, cooking and culinary oils, granolas, granola bars, cereal bars, canned, chilled fresh, aseptic and instant soups, greek-styleGreek-style yogurt, chilis, packaged grains, chocolate, nut butters, juices including cold-pressed juice, hot-eating, chilled hot-eating and frozen desserts, cookies, crackers, gluten-free frozen entrees and bars, frozen pastas and ethnic meals, frozen fruit and vegetables, cut fresh fruit, refrigerated and frozen soy protein meat-alternative products, tofu, seitan and tempeh products, jams, fruit spreads and jelly, honey and marmalade products, as well as other food products. Grocery products accounted for approximately 68%66% of our consolidated net sales in 2012, 62%2015, 77% in 20112014 and 67%74% in 2010.2013.

Snacks

Our organic and natural snack products include a variety of veggie and other straws, potato, root vegetable and other exotic vegetable chips, straws, tortilla style chips, made with organic corn, whole grain
chips, baked cheddarpita chips, puffs and popcorn. Snack products accounted for approximately 15%11% of our consolidated net sales in 2012, 18%2015, 12% in 20112014 and 11%13% in 2010.2013.

Tea

We are a leading manufacturer and marketer of specialty teas.teas.  We develop flavorful and unique blends that are made from high-quality natural ingredients and flavors, and packaged in attractive, colorful and thought-provoking boxes. Our tea products includecurrently offer more than 70 varieties of herbal, green, black, wellness, white, red (rooibos)rooibos and chai teas. We offer caffeinatedtea lattes. Each blend is crafted from the finest herbs, teas, spices and herbal teasbotanicals, and also offer iced teasis presented in packaging that do not require boiling water.features the beautiful imagery and inspiring words for which our brand is known. We also offer a lineselection of ready to drinkready-to-drink beverages, including organic kombucha products and greenchai tea and kombucha energy shots.lattes. Tea products accounted for approximately 8%5% of our consolidated net sales in 2012, 9% 20112015, 5% in 2014 and 10%6% in 2010.2013.

Personal Care Products

Our natural health and beautypersonal care products cover a variety of personal care categories including skin, hair and oral care, deodorants, baby care items, diapers, acne treatment, body washes and sunscreens. Personal care products accounted for approximately 8%5% of our consolidated net sales in 2012, 10%2015, 6% in 20112014 and 10%7% in 2010.2013.
Fresh
Poultry/Protein Products

Our freshpoultry and protein products include fresh sandwiches, appetizersare manufactured and full-plated mealsmarketed as antibiotic-free or organic, vegetarian fed and humanely raised, a portion of which are kosher products. A full range of turkey and chicken products are offered for distribution to retailers, caterers,meat, deli, and food service providers, such as those in the transportation business. Freshprepared foods. Poultry products accountaccounted for approximately 1%13% of our consolidated net sales.sales in 2015. There were no sales of poultry and protein products included in our consolidated net sales for 2014 or 2013 as the businesses in this product category were accounted for under either the equity method or cost method of accounting prior to fiscal 2015.

Seasonality

Certain of our product lines have seasonal fluctuations. Hot tea, baking products, hot cereal, hot-eating desserts and soup sales are stronger in colder months while sales of snack foods and certain of our prepared food products are stronger in the warmer months. Additionally, with our recent acquisitions of HPPC, Empire and Tilda, our net sales and earnings may further fluctuate based on the timing of holidays throughout the year. As such, our results of operations and our cash flows for any particular quarter are not indicative of the results we expect for the full year and our historical seasonality may not be indicative of future quarterly results of operations. For fiscal 2016, we anticipate that our net sales will be the highest in the second fiscal quarter and lowest in the first fiscal quarter, with the third and fourth fiscal quarters being generally similar to one another. However, this may be impacted by the timing of any future acquisitions we complete.


4



Segments

We continuously evaluate our existing products for quality, taste, nutritional value and cost and make improvements where possible. We discontinue products or stock keeping units (“SKUs”) when sales of those items do not warrant further production.

Segments
Weprincipally manage our business by geography and report operating results geographically. Our reportable segments arein five segments: the United States, the United Kingdom, Hain Pure Protein, Canada and Europe. Each operating segment includes the results of operations attributable to its geographic location except that the United States operating segment includes the results of operations of the Ella’s Kitchen brand, which coversprimarily conducts business in the United States and United Kingdom. The United Kingdom operating segment includes the results of operations of Tilda for the United Kingdom, the Middle East and Ireland,North Africa, Continental Europe, United States and Rest of World. The Rest of World segment includes our operations in Canada and continental Europe.India. We use segment operating income to evaluate segment performance and to allocate resources. We believe this measure is most relevant to investors in order to analyze segment results and trends. Segment operating income excludes certain general corporate expenses (which are a component of selling, general and administrative expenses) and acquisition related expenses, restructuring and restructuring expenses.integration charges.

For reporting purposes, Canada and Europe do not currently meet the quantitative thresholds for reporting and are therefore combined as “Rest of World.” Net sales for our reportable segments were as follows:

3


Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
United States991,626
72% 910,095
82% 722,211
81%$1,367,388
51% $1,282,175
59% $1,095,867
63%
United Kingdom(a)192,352
14% 39,284
4% 31,304
4%735,996
28% 637,454
30% 420,408
24%
Rest of World194,269
14% 159,167
14% 136,492
15%
Hain Pure Protein358,582
13% 
% 
%
Rest of World (a)
226,549
8% 233,982
11% 218,408
13%
Total$1,378,247
100% 1,108,546
100% 890,007
100%$2,688,515
100% $2,153,611
100% $1,734,683
100%

(a)Net sales for the United Kingdom segment for fiscal 2015 include sales of plant-based beverages in the United Kingdom that were previously reported in the Rest of World segment due to a change in the responsibilities for this business.

See Note 1, Business, and Note 17,18, Segment Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our segments.

United States Segment:

Our majorThe brands sold by the United States segment by category are:

Grocery:

Our grocery products include Earth's Best® infantAlmond Dream®,Coconut Dream®,Rice Dream®,Soy Dream® and toddler food, Earth's Best Organic® baby yogurt and fruit smoothies, Soy Dream®, WestSoy®, Rice Dream®, Coconut Dream® and Almond Dream® non-dairyWestSoy® plant-based beverages and frozen desserts, Arrowhead Mills® flourMills® flours, mixes and baking mixes, hotcereals, BluePrint® cold-pressed juice drinks, DeBoles® pasta, DreamTM plant-based yogurt, Earth’s Best® and cold cereals, DeBoles® pasta,Ella’s Kitchen® infant formula, infant, toddler and kids foods, diapers and wipes, Ethnic Gourmet® frozen meals, Hain Pure Foods®Foods® condiments, Spectrum® and Hollywood® cooking and culinary and Spectrum Essentials® nutritional oils, Health Valley® granolas,Valley® granola bars, cereal, cereal bars cookies, crackers, and canned soups, Imagine®Imagine® aseptic soups, Nile Spice® instant soups,stocks and gravies, MaraNatha® nut butters, Rudi’s Gluten-Free Bakery and Rudi’s Organic Bakery® breads, buns, bagels, tortillas, and other related items, Spectrum Essentials® nutritional oils, SunSpire® chocolates, The Greek Gods® greek-styleGods® Greek-style yogurt Almond Dream® yogurt, Casbah® packaged grains, SunSpire® chocolate, MaraNatha® nut butters,and kefir, Walnut Acres® juicesAcres® juice drinks and pasta sauces, cookies, crackers, GlutenFree Cafe® gluten-free frozen entrees and bars, Rosetto® frozen pastas, Ethnic Gourmet® frozen meals, Yves Veggie Cuisine® soy protein meat-alternative products, Westbrae Natural®® vegetarian products, and WestSoy®WestSoy® brand tofu, seitan and tempeh products, and Yves Veggie Cuisine® meat-alternative products.

Snacks:

Our snack food products consist of Terra®Terra® varieties of root vegetable chips, potato chips and other exotic vegetable chips, Garden
of Eatin'Eatin’® organic tortilla chip products, Sensible Portions®Portions® snack products including Garden Veggie Straws®Straws®, Garden Veggie Chips®,Chips, Potato Straws, and Apple Straws snack products,and Pita Bites®, Bostons - The Best You've Ever Tasted® popcorn, tortillaBites® and Bearitos® pita chips and snack mix, Bearitos® and Little Bear Snack Foods®.other snacks.

Tea:

Our tea products are marketed under the Celestial Seasonings®Seasonings® brand and include more than 70 varieties of herbal, green, black, wellness, white, red (rooibos)rooibos and chai teas,tea lattes, with well-known names like Sleepytime®and products such as Sleepytime®, Sleepytime Extra, Lemon Zinger®, Mandarin Orange Spice®Zinger®, Cinnamon Apple Spice Red Zinger®, Tension Tamer® and Country Peach Passion®Passion®. We also sell a line of ready to drink beverages including organic kombucha products and greenchai tea and kombucha energy shots.lattes. Since 2003, we have worked closely with Keurig Green Mountain, Coffee Roasters, Inc. to offer a selection of Celestial Seasonings®

5



Seasonings® teas in K-Cup®K-Cup® portion packs for the Keurig®Keurig® Single-Cup Brewing system, including manysystem. (K-Cup® and Keurig® are registered trademarks of our popular hot teas and a line of Brew Over Ice iced teas.Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.)

Personal Care:

Our health and beautypersonal care products include skin, hair and oral care, deodorants and baby care items under the Alba Botanica®, Avalon Organics®Organics®, Alba Botanica®Earth’s Best®, JASON®, Zia® natural skincare,JASON® and Queen Helene® and Earth's Best®Helene® brands.

Sales and Distribution

Our products are sold throughout the United States.States and other parts of the world. Our customer base consists principally of specialty and natural food distributors, and retailers, supermarkets, natural food stores, mass-market and e-tailers,e-commerce retailers, food service channels and club, stores, drug store chains and grocery wholesalers.
In the United States, ourconvenience stores. Our products are sold through a combination of our retail direct sales forcepeople, brokers and internaldistributors. We believe that our direct sales professionals, supported by third-party food brokers.people combined with brokers and distributors provide an effective means of reaching a broad and diverse customer base. Food brokers act as agents for us within designated territories, usually on a non-exclusive basis, and receive commissions. A portion of our direct sales force is organized into dedicated teams to serve our significant customers. Additionally, during fiscal 2015, we utilizehave begun outsourcing our retail direct sales force for sales into natural food stores, which has allowed us to reduce our reliance on food brokers.channel merchandising function.

4


A significant portion of the products marketed by us are sold through independent food distributors. Food distributors purchase products from us for resale to retailers. Because food distributors take title to the products upon purchase, product pricing decisions on sales of our products by the distributors to the retailers are generally made in their sole discretion. We may influence product pricing with the use of promotional incentives.

United Kingdom Segment:
Our major
In the United Kingdom, our products include frozen and chilled products, including but not limited to soups, fruits and fresh juices, as well as jams, fruit spreads, jellies, honey, marmalades, nut butters, meat-free and plant-based products and premium rice and grain-based products.

The brands sold by our United Kingdom segment by category are:

Grocery:

Our grocery products include New Covent Garden Soup Co.® chilled soups, Farmhouse Fare®Fare® and Lovetub®Lovetub® hot-eating desserts, Johnson'sJohnson’s Juice Co.® fresh juices, Linda McCartney®McCartney® chilled and frozen meat-free meals, Cully & Sully®Sully® chilled soups and ready meals, Hartley’s® jams, fruit spreads and Rice Dream® non-dairy beverages.jellies, Sun-Pat® nut butters, Gale’s® honey, Robertson’s® and Frank Cooper’s® marmalades and Tilda® rice and grain-based products. We also provide a comprehensive range of private label goodsand retailer own-label products to multiplemany retailers, convenience stores and foodservice providers in the following categories; fresh soup, prepared fruit, fresh juice, fresh smoothies, chilled and frozen desserts, meat-free meals and meat-free meals.

Salesambient grocery products. During fiscal 2015, 37% of our net sales in the United Kingdom segment were attributable to private label and Distributionretailer own-label products.

Our products are principally sold throughout the United Kingdom, Ireland and Ireland.other parts of the world. Our customer base consists principally of retailers, convenience stores, foodservice providers, business to business, natural food and ethnic specialty distributors, club stores and wholesalers.

RestHain Pure Protein Segment:

Our Hain Pure Protein segment includes a full range of World Segment (Canadaantibiotic-free, hormone-free and Continental Europe):organic poultry products, including fresh tray pack, frozen, deli, fully cooked, and gluten-free products sold under the FreeBird®, Plainville Farms®, Empire® and Kosher Valley® brands. A range of private label products is also provided to many customers.

Our products are sold in the United States through a combination of direct sales people, brokers and distributors. Our customer base consists principally of grocery and natural food retailers and certain club stores, as well as food service outlets including fast casual and white tablecloth venues, which feature food that is grown sustainably and without genetically modified organisms.

Canada Segment:

Our major brands sold in Canada by category are:

Grocery:

Our grocery products include Yves Veggie Cuisine®Cuisine® refrigerated and frozen soy protein meat-alternative products, Yves canned vegetables and lentils, Europe's Best®Europe’s Best® frozen fruitfruits and frozen vegetables, Earth's Best®Earth’s Best® and Ella’s Kitchen® infant and toddler food, Casbah®Rudi’s Gluten-Free Bakery and Rudi’s Organic Bakery® breads, buns, bagels, tortillas, and other related items, Casbah® packaged grains, MaraNatha®MaraNatha® nut butters, Spectrum Essentials®Essentials® cooking and culinary oils, Imagine®Imagine® aseptic soups, Health Valley®Valley® canned soups and frozen fruit,

6



Nile Spice®Spice® instant soups, DeBoles®Arrowhead Mills® gluten free pasta, Arrowhead Mills® flour and The Greek Gods® greek-style yogurt. Gods® Greek-style yogurt, Robertson’s® marmalades, BluePrint® cold-pressed juice drinks and Tilda® rice and grain-based products. Our plant-based beverages include Soy Dream®, Rice Dream®, Oat Dream®, Coconut Dream® and Almond Dream® in aseptic format, Rice Dream® in refrigerated format and Rice Dream® and Almond Dream® plant-based frozen desserts.

Tea:

Our tea products are marketed under the Celestial Seasonings®Seasonings® brand and include more than 30 varieties of herbal, green, black, wellness, white, red (rooibos)rooibos and chai teas,tea lattes, with familiar names like Sleepytime®Sleepytime®, Lemon Zinger®Zinger® and Bengal Spice®. Our non-dairy beverages include Soy Dream®, Rice Dream®, Oat Dream®, Coconut Dream® and Almond Dream® in aseptic format, Rice Dream® in refrigerated format and Rice Dream® and Almond Dream® frozen desserts.Cinnamon Apple Spice.

Snacks:

Our snack food products consist of Terra®Terra® varieties of root vegetable chips, potato chips and other exotic vegetable chips, Garden of Eatin'Eatin’® organic tortilla chips and baked cheddar puff products, Sensible Portions®Portions® Garden Veggie Straws®, Potato Straws® and Pita Bites® snack products.Bites®.

Personal Care:

Our health and beautypersonal care products include skin, hair and oral care, deodorants and baby care items under the Avalon Organics®Organics®, Alba Botanica®, JASON® and Earth's Best® brands.

Our major brands sold by the Continental Europe segment by category are:

Grocery:

Our grocery brands include Lima®, Danival®, Natumi®, and GG UniqueFiberBotanicaTM®. The Lima brand includes traditional Japanese products such as soy sauce, miso and edamame, as well as grains, pasta, breakfast cereals, cereal cakes, snacks, sweeteners, spreads, non-dairy beverages, soups and condiments. The Danival® brand includes cooked vegetables, sauces, fruit spreads and jams, chestnuts and dessert products. Natumi® produces and sells non-dairy beverages based on rice, soy, oat and spelt. GG UniqueFiber, JASONTM® produces high-fiber bran products in cracker and sprinkle form. We sell our non-dairy Rice Dream® brand, Terra® varieties of root vegetable and potato chips, and Celestial Seasonings® teas in Europe as well.Live Clean® brands.


5


Other:

We process, market and distribute fresh prepared foods from our facility in Brussels, Belgium which includes appetizers, sandwiches and full-plated meals for distribution to retailers, caterers, and food service providers, such as those in the transportation business.
Sales and Distribution

Canada:
Our products are sold throughout Canada. Our customer base consists principally of grocery supermarkets, mass merchandisers, club stores, natural food distributors, personal care distributors, drug store chains, and food service distributors.

In Canada, our Our products are sold through our own retail direct sales force. We also utilize third-party brokers who receive commissions and sell to foodservice and club customers and also handle our personal care sales.customers. We utilize a third party merchandising team for retail execution. As in the United States, a portion of the products marketed by us are sold through independent distributors.

Europe:Europe Segment:

Our major brands sold by the Europe segment include Danival®, Dream®, Joya®, Lima® and Natumi®. The Danival®brand includes organic cooked vegetables, prepared meals, sauces, fruit spreads and desserts. The Lima® brand includes a wide range of 100% organic products such as soy sauce, plant-based beverages and grain cakes, as well as grains, pasta, breakfast cereals, miso, snacks, sweeteners, spreads, soups and condiments. Natumi®and Dream® produce and sell plant-based beverages, including rice, soy, oat and spelt. We also sell our Hartley’s® jams, fruit spreads and jellies, Terra®varieties of root vegetable and potato chips, and Celestial Seasonings®teas in Europe as well. Our Joya® brand, which was acquired on July 24, 2015, includes soy, oat, rice and nut based drinks as well as plant-based yogurts, desserts, creamers, tofu and private label products.

Our products are sold throughout Europe. European customers consist primarily of naturalin grocery stores and organic food stores.stores throughout Europe. Our products are primarily sold using our own direct sales force.force and local distributors.

Customers

Our largest customer, United Natural Foods, Inc., a distributor, accounted for approximately 12%, 13% and 15% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which were primarily related to the United States segment. A second customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates Sam’s Club and ASDA, together accounted for approximately 10%, 11% and 10% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which were primarily related to the United States and United Kingdom segments. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our net sales in the past three fiscal years.

Foreign Operations

We sell our products to consumerscustomers in more than 5070 countries. International sales represented approximately 28.1%41%, 17.9%40% and 37%18.9%
of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively. For a discussion of risks related to our foreign operations, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.


7



Marketing

We use a combination of trade and consumer promotions to market our products. We use trade advertising and promotion, including placement fees, cooperative advertising and feature advertising in distribution catalogs. We also utilizeConsumer advertising and sales promotion expenditurespromotions are also made via national and regional consumer promotion through magazine advertising, couponingsocial media and other trial use programs. We utilize in-store product demonstrations and sampling in the club store channel. Our investments in consumer spending are aimed at enhancing brand equity and increasing consumption. These consumer spending categories include, but are not limited to, coupons, consumer advertising using radio and print, direct mailing, and e-consumer relationship programs and other forms of promotions. During fiscal 2014, a portion of our trade promotional spending in our United States segment strategically shifted from activities classified as selling expenses to activities classified as a reduction of sales, and this trend continued in the first half of fiscal 2015. Additionally, we maintain separate websites for most of our brands. Each website features product information regarding the particular brand.

We also utilize sponsorship programs to help create brand awareness. In the United States, our Earth's Best®Earth’s Best® brand has an arrangement agreement
with PBS Kids and Sesame StreetWorkshop and our Terra Blues®Blues® are the official snack of JetBlue Airways. Hain Celestial, Terra®Terra® chips and Sensible Portions®Portions® are each an official partner of the New York Knicks. In addition, Sensible Portions products, Yves Veggie Cuisine®Cuisine® meatless burgers and Terra®Terra® chips are advertised and sold at Citi Field. In Canada, Hain Celestial Canada was the official supplier of natural and organic packaged grocery products for the 2010 Olympic Winter Games and Paralympic Winter Games held in Vancouver, Canada. As the official supplier, Hain Celestial Canada has the right to use the Olympic logo on the packaging of certain of its brands for sale in Canada through December 2012.There is no guarantee that these promotional investments in consumer spendingare or will be successful.

New Product Initiatives Through Research and Development

We consider research and development of new products to be a significant part of our overall philosophy and we are committed to developing innovative, high-quality and safe products that exceed consumer expectations. A team of professional product developers, including microbiologists, nutritionists, food scientists, chefs and chemists, work to develop products to meet changing consumer needs. Our research and development staff incorporates product ideas from all areas of our business in order to formulate new products. In addition to developing new products, the research and development staff routinely reformulates and improves existing products based on advances in ingredients, packaging and technology, and conducts value engineering to maintain competitive price points. We incurred approximately $3.9$10.3 million in Company-sponsored research and development activities in 2012, $3.52015, $10.0 million in 20112014 and $2.5$7.5 million in 2010. Our2013. In addition to our Company-sponsored research and development investments do not include the expenditures on such activities, undertaken byour research and development staff works closely with our co-packers and suppliers who develop numerous products and ingredients collaboratively with us which are aligned withon a variety of initiatives. The costs incurred by our brand strategies and our corporate mission. These efforts by co-packers and suppliers are not included in the aforementioned expenditures. These efforts have resulted in a substantial number of our new product introductions and product reformulations. We

6


are unable to estimate the investments made by co-packers and suppliers in research and development on our behalf;as much of this work is built into the pricing of such products, however, we believe these activities and expenditures are important to our continuing ability to grow our business.


Production
Production
Manufacturing

During 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, approximately 48%61%, 44%57% and 38%55%, respectively, of our revenue was derived from products manufactured at our own facilities.

Our United States segment currently operates the following manufacturing facilities:

Boulder, Colorado, (four facilities) which producesproduce Celestial Seasonings®Seasonings® specialty teas and kombucha;
Moonachie, New Jersey, which produces Terra® root vegetable and potato chips;
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which produces Sensible Portions® snack products;
Hereford, Texas, which produces Arrowhead Mills® cereals, flours and baking ingredients;
Shreveport, Louisiana, which produces DeBoles® organic and gluten-free pasta;
West Chester, Pennsylvania, which produces Ethnic Gourmet® frozen meals, Rosetto® frozen pastas and Gluten Free Café WestSoy® frozen entrees;
Ashland, Oregon, which produces MaraNatha® nut butters;
Boulder, Colorado, which produces our WestSoy® fresh tofu, seitan and tempeh products; and Rudi’s Organic Bakery® organic breads, buns, bagels, tortillas, wraps and soft pretzels and Rudi’s Gluten-Free Bakery gluten-free products including breads, buns, pizza crusts, tortillas, snack bars and stuffing;
Moonachie, New Jersey, which produces Terra® root vegetable and potato chips;
Mountville, Pennsylvania, which produces Sensible Portions® snack products;
Hereford, Texas, which produces Arrowhead Mills® cereals, flours and baking ingredients;
Shreveport, Louisiana, which produces DeBoles® organic and gluten-free pasta;
West Chester, Pennsylvania, which produces Earth’s Best® and Ella’s Kitchen® pouches, BluePrint® cold-pressed juice drinks, Ethnic Gourmet® frozen meals and Rosetto® frozen pastas;
Ashland, Oregon, which produces Arrowhead Mills® and MaraNatha® nut butters;
Culver City, California, which produces Alba Botanica®Botanica®, Avalon Organics®Organics®, JASON®JASON® and Earth's Best®Earth’s Best® personal care products.products; and
Hawthorne, California, which produces BluePrint® cold-pressed juice drinks.


8



Our United Kingdom segment has the following manufacturing facilities:

Histon, England, which produces our ambient grocery products including Hartley’s®, Frank Cooper’s®, Robertson’s® and Gale’s®;
Rainhaim, England, (two facilities) which produce our classic and ready-to-heat Tilda® rice and grain-based products;
Grimsby, England, which produces our New Covent Garden Soup Co.® fresh and Cully & Sully® chilled soups;
Peterborough, England, which also produces New Covent Garden Soup Co.® fresh chilled soups;
Ashford, England, which produces our Johnsons Juice Co.® fruit juices;
Clitheroe, England, which produces our Farmhouse Fare®Fare® hot-eating desserts;
Leeds, England, which prepares our fresh fruit products;
Luton, England, which produces fruit and vegetable meal solutions;
Fakenham, England, which produces Linda McCartney® meat-free frozen foods, as well as chilled dessert products; and
Leeds, England, which prepares our fresh fruit products;
Luton, England, which produces healthy fruit and vegetable meal solutions; and
Fakenham, England, which produces Linda McCartney® and other meat-free frozen foods and frozen dessert products.

Our Rest of World segment has the following manufacturing facilities:
Vancouver, British Columbia, which produces Yves Veggie Cuisine® soy-based meat-alternative products;
Brussels, Belgium, which prepares Grains Noirs® fresh organic appetizers, salads, sandwiches and other full-plated dishes;
Eitorf, Germany, which produces Natumi® soymilk, Rice Dream® and other non-dairy beverages;
Andiran, France, which produces our Danival® organic food products; and
Larvik, Norway, which produces our GG UniqueFiberTM products.

Our Hain Pure Protein segment has the following manufacturing facilities:

Mifflintown, Pennsylvania, which produces Empire® and Kosher Valley® poultry products;
New Oxford, Pennsylvania, which produces Plainville Farms® poultry products;
Fredericksburg, Pennsylvania (two facilities), which produces FreeBird® poultry products; and
Liverpool, New York, which produces prepared poultry and other products.

Our Rest of World segment has the following manufacturing facilities:

Vancouver, British Columbia, which produces Yves Veggie Cuisine® meat-alternative products;
Mississauga, Ontario, which produces our Live Clean® personal care products;
Troisdorf, Germany, which produces Natumi®, Rice Dream®, Lima® and other plant-based beverages;
Andiran, France, which produces our Danival® organic food products;
Oberwart, Austria, which produces plant-based foods and beverages; and
Schwerin, Germany, which produces plant-based foods and beverages.

We own the manufacturing facilities in Moonachie, New Jersey; Boulder, Colorado; Hereford, Texas; Shreveport, Louisiana; West Chester, Pennsylvania; Ashland, Oregon; Mifflintown, Pennsylvania; New Oxford, Pennsylvania; Fredericksburg, Pennsylvania; Liverpool, New York; Vancouver, British Columbia; Andiran, France; Histon, England; Rainham, England; Ashford, England; and Fakenham, England.

Co-Packers

In addition to the products manufactured in our own facilities, independent manufacturers, who are referred to in our industry as co-packers, manufacture many of our products. During 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, approximately 52%39%, 56%43% and 62%45%, respectively, of our revenue was derived from products manufactured by independent co-packers. Many of our co-packers produce products for other companies as well. We believe that alternative sources of co-packing production are available for the majority of our co-packed products, although we may experience disruption in our operations if we are required to change any of our significant co-packing arrangements. Our co-packers are audited regularly by our quality assurance staff and are required to follow our Food Safety & Quality manual detailing standard operating procedures and compliance towith Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs), as well as to our new Supplier Code of Conduct.. Additionally, the co-packers are required to ensure our products are manufactured in accordance with our quality and safety specifications and that they are compliant with all regulations, including new regulations issued under the 2010 U.S. Food Safety and Modernization Act. For a discussion of risks related to our co-packers, see "Risk Factors" in Item 1A.

7



Suppliers of Ingredients and Packaging

Our natural and certified organic and natural raw materials as well as our packaging materials are obtained from various suppliers primarily located inaround the United States, and in the United Kingdom, Canada and Europe for our operations in those areas.
world. All of our raw and packaging materials are purchased based upon requirements designed to meet our rigid specifications for food quality and safety and to comply with applicable U.S. and international regulations. The Company works with reputableits suppliers whoto assure the quality and safety of their ingredients. These assurances are supported by our purchasing contracts and quality assurance specification packets including affidavits, certificates of analysis and analytical testing, where required. Additionally our suppliers sign our new Supplier Code of Conduct, and are required to ensure that the ingredients they supply are in compliance with all laws and regulations. Our purchasers visit major suppliers around the world to procure competitively priced, quality ingredients that meet our specifications. Our quality assurance staff conducts written and then periodic on-site routine audits of ingredient vendors. We maintain ethical trade standards for ingredients such as cocoa by partnering with Fair Trade USA and Caring for Cocoa Communities Program for supporting sustainable farming practices, fair pricing and labor conditions.

We maintain long-term relationships with many of our suppliers. Purchase arrangements with ingredient suppliers are generally made annually and in the local currency of the country in which we operate.annually. Purchases are made through purchase orders or contracts, and price, delivery terms and product specifications vary.


9



Competition

We operate in highly competitive geographic and product markets. Competitors include large national and international companies and numerous local and regional companies, some of which have greater resources. We compete for limited retailer shelf space for our products, and some of those retailers also market competitive products under their own private labels. We also compete with the conventional products of larger mainstream companies. Products are distinguished based on product quality, price, nutritional value, brand recognition and loyalty, product innovation, promotional activity, and the ability to identify and satisfy consumer preferences.

Trademarks

Trademarks
We believe that brand awareness is a significant component in a consumer'sconsumer’s decision to purchase one product over another in highly competitive consumer products industries. Our trademarks and brand names for the product lines referred to herein are registered in the United States, Canada, the European Union and a number of other foreign countries and we intend to keep these filings current and seek protection for new trademarks to the extent consistent with business needs. We also copyright certain of our artwork and package designs. We own the trademarks for our principal products, including Earth's Best®Alba Botanica®, Sensible Portions®Arrowhead Mills®, Terra®Avalon Organics®, Rice Dream®Bearitos®, BluePrint®, Breadshop’s®, Casbah®, Celestial Seasonings®, Cully & Sully®, Danival®, DeBoles®, Earth’s Best®, Earth’s Best TenderCare®, Ella’s Kitchen®, Empire®, Ethnic Gourmet®, Farmhouse Fare®, Frank Cooper’s®, FreeBird®, Gale’s®, Garden of Eatin’®, Hain Pure Foods®, Hartley’s®, Health Valley®, Imagine®, JASON®, Johnson’s Juice Co.®, Joya®, Kosher Valley®,Lima®, Live Clean®, MaraNatha®, Natumi®, New Covent Garden Soup Co.®,Nile Spice®, Arrowhead Mills®Plainville Farms®, Bearitos®Queen Helene®, Breadshop's®Rice Dream®, Casbah®Robertson’s®, Rosetto®, Rudi’s Organic Bakery®, Sensible Portions®, Soy Dream®, Spectrum Naturals®Essentials®, Spectrum Essentials®Naturals®, MaraNatha®Sun-Pat®, SunSpire®SunSpire®, Celestial Seasonings®, DeBoles®, Ethnic Gourmet®, Garden of Eatin'Terra®, The Greek Gods®Gods®, Hain Pure Foods®, Health Valley®, Imagine®, JASON®, Zia®, Little Bear Organic Foods®, Nile Spice®, Boston's The Best You've Ever Tasted®, Soy Dream®, Rosetto®, Gluten Free CaféTilda®, Walnut Acres Organic®Organic®, Westbrae Natural®®, WestSoy®, Lima®, Danival®, Grains Noirs®, Natumi®, Johnson's Juice Co.WestSoy®, Farmhouse Fare®, Cully & Sully®, and Yves Veggie Cuisine®, Avalon Organics®, Alba Botanica®, Queen Helene®, Batherapy®, Shower Therapy®, Footherapy® and Earth's Best TenderCare® brands.Cuisine®. We also have trademarks for most of our best-selling Celestial Seasonings teas, including Sleepytime®Country Peach Passion®, Lemon Zinger®Zinger®, Mandarin Orange Spice®Spice®, Raspberry Zinger®, Red Zinger®Zinger®, Sleepytime®, Tension Tamer®and Wild Berry Zinger®, Tension Tamer®, Country Peach Passion® and Raspberry Zinger®Zinger®.

We market theproducts under brands licensed under trademark license agreements, including Linda McCartney® brand under license. In addition, we license the right from Sesame Workshop to utilizeMcCartney®, the Sesame Street name and logo as well asand other Sesame StreetWorkshop intellectual property on certain of our Earth's Best® products. (See Item 1A. Risk Factors - “Our Inability to Use Our Trademarks Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business.”)Earth’s Best® products, Cadbury®, Rose’s® and Candle Cafe™ brand.


Government Regulation
Along with our co-packers, brokers, distributors and raw materials and packaging suppliers, we
We are subject to extensive regulations in the United States by federal, state and local government authorities. In the United States, the federal agencies governing the manufacture, marketing and distribution of our products include, among others, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the United States Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”), the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”). Under various statutes, these agencies prescribe, among other things, the requirements and establish the standards for quality, safety and

8


representation of our products to the consumer in labeling and advertising. Certain of these agencies, in certain circumstances, must not only approve our products, but also review the manufacturing processes and facilities used to produce these products before these products can be marketed in the United States. In addition to this oversight, advertising of our business is subject to regulation by the FTC.

Internationally, we are subject to the laws and regulatory authorities of the foreign jurisdictions in which we manufacture and sell our products, including the Food Standards Agency in the United Kingdom, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in Canada and European Food Safety Authority which supports the European Commission, as well as individual country, province, state and local regulations.

Independent Certification

In the United States, we certify our organic products in accordance towith the USDA'sUSDA’s National Organic Program through organizations such as Quality Assurance International (“QAI”), Oregon Tilth and the Texas Department of Agriculture.. Where reciprocity does not exist or where a product is marketed solely outside of the United States, we use accredited certifying agencies to ensure compliance with country-specific government regulations for selling organic products.

The majority of our products are certified kosher under the supervision of accredited agencies including The Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations, The Organized Kashruth Laboratories, The K’hal Adath Jeshurun (“KAJ”), “KOF-K” Kosher Supervision, Star K Kosher Certification Kosher Overseers Associatedand Circle K.


10



We also work with other non-governmental organizations such as NSF International, which developed the NSF/ANSI 305 Standard for Personal Care Products Made withContaining Organic Ingredients and provides third party certification through QAI for our personal care products in the absence of an established government regulation for these products. In addition, we work with other nongovernmental organizations such as the Gluten Free Intolerance Group, Whole Grain Council and the Non-GMO Project.

We are working with the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) to certify all of our Company-owned manufacturing facilities under accredited programs including SQF (Safe Quality Foods) and BRC (British Retail Consortium) and ISO (International Organization for Standardization).

Available Information

The following information can be found, free of charge, on our corporate website at http://www.hain-celestial.com:www.hain.com:

our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”);
our policies related to corporate governance, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Ethics”) applying to our directors, officers and employees (including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer) that we have adopted to meet the requirements set forth in the rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq;NASDAQ; and
the charters of the Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees of our Board of Directors.

In addition, copies of the Company'sCompany’s annual report will be made available, free of charge, upon written request.

We intend to satisfy the applicable disclosure requirements regarding amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of our Code of Ethics by posting such information on our website. The information contained on our website or connected to our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report.


11




Item 1A.     Risk Factors

Our business, operations and financial condition are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The most significant of these risks include those described below; however, there may be additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develop into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. These risk factors should be read in conjunction with the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the other documents that we file from time to timetime-to-time with the SEC.

9




Disruptions in the Worldwide Economyworldwide economy and the Financial Markets May Adversely Impact Our Businessfinancial markets may adversely impact our business and Resultsresults of Operationsoperations.

Adverse and uncertain economic and market conditions, particularly in the locations in which we operate, may impact customer and consumer demand for our products and our ability to manage normal commercial relationships with our customers, suppliers and creditors. Consumers may shift purchases to lower-priced or other perceived value offerings during economic downturns, which may adversely affect our results of operations. Consumers may also reduce the number of naturalorganic and organicnatural products that they purchase where there are conventional alternatives, given that naturalorganic and organicnatural products generally have higher retail prices than do their conventional counterparts. In addition, consumers may choose to purchase private label products rather than branded products, which generally have lower retail prices than do their branded counterparts. Distributors and retailers may become more conservative in response to these conditions and seek to reduce their inventories. Our results of operations depend upon, among other things, our ability to maintain and increase sales volumes with existing customers, our ability to attract new customers, the financial condition of our customers and our ability to provide products that appeal to consumers at the right price.

Prolonged unfavorable economic conditions may have an adverse effect on any of these factors and, therefore, could adversely impact our sales and profitability.

Our Markets Are Highly Competitivemarkets are highly competitive.

We operate in highly competitive geographic and product markets. Numerous brands and products compete for limited retailer shelf space, where competition is based on product quality, brand recognition, andbrand loyalty, price, product innovation, and promotional activity, availability and taste among other things. Retailers also market competitive products under their own private labels which are generally sold at lower prices and compete with some of our products. During periods of economic uncertainty, such as we have recently experienced, consumers tend to purchase more private label products, which could reduce sales volumes of our products.

Some of our markets are dominated by multinational corporations with greater resources and more substantial operations than us. We cannot be certain that we will successfully compete for sales to distributors or retailers that purchase from larger competitors that have greater financial, managerial, sales and technical resources. Conventional food companies, including but not limited to Campbell Soup Company, DeanThe WhiteWave Foods Company, Mondelez International, Inc., General Mills, Inc., Groupe Danone, The J.M. Smucker Company, Kellogg Company, The Kraft Foods Inc.,Heinz Company, Nestle S.A., PepsiCo, Inc. and Unilever, PLC, and conventional personal care products companies, including but not limited to The ProctorProcter and Gamble Company, Johnson & Johnson and Colgate-Palmolive, may be able to use their resources and scale to respond to competitive pressures and changes in consumer preferences by introducing new products or reformulating their existing products, reducing prices or increasing promotional activities. We also compete with other naturalorganic and organicnatural packaged food brands and companies, including Annie's, Inc., Nature's Path Foods, Inc. and Amy's Kitchen, and with smaller companies, which may be more innovative and able to bring new products to market faster and better able to quickly exploit and serve niche markets. Retailers also market competitive products under their own private labels, which are generally sold at lower prices and compete with some of our products. As a result of actual or perceived conflicts resulting from this competition, retailers may take actions that negatively affect us. As a result, we may need to increase our marketing, advertising and promotional spending to protect our existing market share, which may result in an adverse impact on our profitability.

Consumer Preferencespreferences for Our Products Are Difficultour products are difficult to Predictpredict and May Changemay change.

Our business is primarily focused on sales of organic, natural and organic products, including specialty teas, non-dairy beverages, infant and toddler foods, cereals, breakfast bars, chilled and fresh aseptic and instant soups, nut butters, cooking oils and personal care“better-for-you” products which, if consumer demand for such categories were to decrease, could harm our business. In addition, we have other product categories such as meat-alternative products and other specialty food items which are subject to evolving consumer preferences.
Consumer trendsdemand could change based on a number of possible factors, including:
including dietary habits and nutritional values, such as fat content or sodium levels;
concerns regarding the health effects of ingredients such as sugar or processed wheat;
a shiftand shifts in preference from organic to non-organic and from natural products to non-natural products;
the availability of competing private label products offered by retailers; and
economic factors and social trends.

10


for various product attributes. A significant shift in consumer demand away from our products or our failure to maintain our current market position could reduce our sales or the prestige of our brands in our markets, which could harm our business. While we continue to diversify our product offerings, developing new products entails risks, and we cannot be certain that demand for our products will continue at current levels or increase in the future.

Our Growth is Dependent on Our Ability to Introduce New Products and Improve Existing Products
Our growth depends in part on our ability to generate and implement improvements to our existing products and to introduce new products to consumers. The success of our innovation and product improvement effort is affected by our ability to anticipate changes in consumers preferences, the level of funding that can be made available, the technical capability of our research and development staff in developing and testing product prototypes, including complying with governmental regulations, and the success of our management in introducing the resulting improvements in a timely manner. If we are unsuccessful in implementing product improvements or introducing new products that satisfy the demands of consumers, our business could be harmed.

Our Acquisition Strategy Exposes Us to Risk, Including Our Ability to Integrate the Brands That We Acquire
We intend to continue to grow our business in part through the acquisition of new brands, both in the United States and internationally. Our acquisition strategy is based on identifying and acquiring brands with products that complement our existing product mix and identifying and acquiring brands in new geographies for purposes of expanding our business internationally. We cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully:
identify suitable acquisition candidates;
negotiate identified acquisitions on terms acceptable to us; or
integrate acquisitions that we complete.
We may encounter increased competition for acquisitions in the future, which could result in acquisition prices we do not consider acceptable. We are unable to predict whether or when any prospective acquisition candidate will become available or the likelihood that any acquisition will be completed. Furthermore, acquisition-related costs are required to be expensed as incurred whether or not the acquisition is completed.
The success of acquisitions we make will be dependent upon our ability to effectively integrate those brands, including our ability to realize potentially available marketing opportunities and cost savings, some of which may involve operational changes. Despite our due diligence investigation of each business that we acquire, there may be liabilities of the acquired companies that we fail to or are unable to discover during the due diligence investigation and for which we, as a successor owner, may be responsible. In connection with acquisitions, we generally seek to minimize the impact of these types of potential liabilities through indemnities and warranties from the seller, which may in some instances be supported by deferring payment of a portion of the purchase price. However, these indemnities and warranties, if obtained, may not fully cover the liabilities due to limitations in scope, amount or duration, financial limitations of the indemnifying party or other reasons. We cannot be certain:
as to the timing or number of marketing opportunities or amount of cost savings that may be realized as the result of our integration of an acquired brand;
that a business combination will enhance our competitive position and business prospects;
that we will be successful if we enter categories or markets in which we have limited or no prior experience;
that we will not experience difficulties with customers, personnel or other parties as a result of a business combination; or
that, with respect to our acquisitions outside the United States, we will not be affected by, among other things, exchange rate risk.
Companies or brands acquired may not achieve the level of sales or profitability that justify the investment made.
We cannot be certain that we will be successful in:
integrating an acquired brand’s distribution channels with our own;
coordinating sales force activities of an acquired brand or in selling the products of an acquired brand to our customer base; or
integrating an acquired brand into our management information systems or integrating an acquired brand’s products into our product mix.
Additionally, integrating an acquired brand into our existing operations will require management resources and may divert management's attention from our day-to-day operations. If we are not successful in integrating the operations of acquired brands, our business could be harmed.

1112



We May Not Be Able to Successfully Consummate Proposed Divestitures
We may, from time to time, divest businesses that are lessrely on independent distributors for a substantial portion of a strategic fit within our portfolio or do not meet our growth or profitability targets. Our profitability may be impacted by gains or losses on the sales of such businesses, or lost operating income or cash flows from such businesses. Additionally, we may be required to record asset impairment or restructuring charges related to divested businesses, or indemnify buyers for liabilities, which may reduce our profitability and cash flows. We may also not be able to negotiate such divestitures on terms acceptable to us. Such potential divestitures will require management resources and may divert management's attention from our day-to-day operations. If we are not successful in divesting such businesses, our business could be harmed.sales.

We May Face Difficulties as We Expand Our Operations into Countries in Which We Have No Prior Operating Experience
We intend to continue to expand our global footprint in order to enter into new markets. This may involve expanding into countries other than those in which we currently operate. It may involve expanding into less developed countries, which may have less political, social or economic stability and less developed infrastructure and legal systems. It is costly to establish, develop and maintain international operations and develop and promote our brands in international markets. As we expand our business into new countries we may encounter regulatory, personnel, technological and other difficulties that increase our expenses or delay our ability to become profitable in such countries. This may have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are Dependent Upon the Services of Our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Management Team
We are highly dependent upon the services of Irwin D. Simon, our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. We believe Mr. Simon's reputation as our founder and his expertise and knowledge in the natural and organic products industry are critical factors in our continuing growth. His relationships with customers and suppliers are not easily found elsewhere in the natural and organic products industry. The loss of the services of Mr. Simon could harm our business.
Additionally, if we lose one or more members of our senior management team, our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows could be harmed. We may not be able to attract new employees or retain the services of all the members of our senior management team.

We Rely on Independent Distributors for a Substantial Portion of Our Sales
We rely upon sales made by or through non-affiliated distributors to customers. Distributors purchase directly for their own account for resale. One distributor, United Natural Foods, Inc., which redistributes products to natural foods supermarkets, independent natural retailers and other retailers, accounted for approximately 18%12%, 21%13% and 21%15% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively. The loss of, or business disruption at, one or more of these distributors may harm our business. If we are required to obtain additional or alternative distribution agreements or arrangements in the future, we cannot be certain that we will be able to do so on satisfactory terms or in a timely manner. Our inability to enter into satisfactory distribution agreements may inhibit our ability to implement our business plan or to establish markets necessary to expand the distribution of our products successfully.

Consolidation of Customerscustomers or the Lossloss of a Significant Customer Could Negatively Impactsignificant customer could negatively impact our Salessales and Profitabilityprofitability.
Retail customers,
Customers, such as supermarkets and food distributors in the United StatesNorth America and the European Union continue to consolidate. This consolidation has produced larger, more sophisticated organizations with increased negotiating and buying power that are able to resist price increases or demand increased promotional programs, as well as operate with lower inventories, decrease the number of brands that they carry and increase their emphasis on private label products, which could negatively impact our business. The consolidation of retail customers also increases the risk that a significant adverse impact on their business could have a corresponding material adverse impact on us.our business.

Our largest customer, United Natural Foods, Inc., a distributor, accounted for approximately 18%12%, 21%13% and 21%15% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 and 2010, respectively.2013, respectively, which were primarily related to the United States segment. A second customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates Sam’s Club and ASDA, together accounted for approximately 10%, 11% and 10% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which were primarily related to the United States and United Kingdom segments. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our net sales in the past three fiscal years.
We do not generally enter into sales agreements with our customers.
The loss of any large customer, the reduction of purchasing levels or the cancellation of any business from a large customer for an extended length of time could negatively impact our sales and profitability.

Loss of One or More of Our Manufacturing Facilities or Independent Co-Packers or Distribution Centers Could Harm growth is dependent on our ability to introduce new products and improve existing products.

Our Business
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011growth depends in part on our ability to generate and 2010, approximately 48%, 44%implement improvements to our existing products and 38%, respectively,to introduce new products to consumers. The success of our revenue wasinnovation and product improvement effort is affected by our ability to anticipate changes in consumers preferences, the level of funding that can be made available, the technical capability of our research and development staff in developing, formulating and testing product prototypes, including complying with governmental regulations, and the success of our management in introducing the resulting improvements in a timely manner. If we are unsuccessful in implementing product improvements or introducing new products that satisfy the demands of consumers, our business could be harmed.

We are dependent upon the services of our Chief Executive Officer and senior management team.

We are highly dependent upon the services of Irwin D. Simon, our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. We believe Mr. Simon’s reputation as our founder and his expertise and knowledge in the organic and natural products industry are critical factors in our continuing growth. His relationships with customers and suppliers are not easily found elsewhere in the organic and natural products industry. The loss of the services of Mr. Simon could harm our business.

Additionally, if we lose one or more members of our senior management team, our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows could be harmed.


1213



derived fromOur acquisition strategy exposes us to risk, including our ability to integrate the brands that we acquire.

We intend to continue to grow our business in part through the acquisition of new brands, both in the United States and internationally. Our acquisition strategy is based on identifying and acquiring brands with products manufactured atthat complement our own manufacturing facilities. An interruptionexisting product mix and identifying and acquiring brands in new categories and in new geographies for purposes of expanding our business internationally. We cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully:

identify suitable acquisition candidates;
negotiate acquisitions of identified candidates on terms acceptable to us; or
integrate acquisitions that we complete.

We may encounter increased competition for acquisitions in the future, which could result in acquisition prices we do not consider acceptable. We are unable to predict whether or when any prospective acquisition candidate will become available or the losslikelihood that any acquisition will be completed. Furthermore, acquisition-related costs are required to be expensed as incurred even though the acquisition may not be completed.

The success of acquisitions we make will be dependent upon our ability to effectively integrate those brands, including our ability to realize potentially available marketing opportunities and cost savings, some of which may involve operational changes. Despite our due diligence investigation of each business that we acquire, there may be liabilities of the acquired companies that we fail to or are unable to discover during the due diligence investigation and for which we, as a successor owner, may be responsible. We cannot be certain:

as to the timing or number of marketing opportunities or amount of cost savings that may be realized as the result of our integration of an acquired brand;
that a business combination will enhance our competitive position and business prospects;
that we will be successful if we enter categories or markets in which we have limited or no prior experience;
that we will be able to coordinate a greater number of diverse businesses and business located in a greater number of geographic locations;
that we will not experience difficulties with customers, personnel or other parties as a result of a business combination;
that we will not enter into disputes with sellers; or
that, with respect to our acquisitions outside the United States, we will not be affected by, among other things, exchange rate risk and risks associated with local regulatory regimes.

Companies or brands acquired may not achieve the level of sales or profitability that justify the investment made. We may determine to discontinue products if they do not meet, among other reasons, our standards for quality or profitability or both, which may have a material adverse effect on sales relating to such acquisition.

We cannot be certain that we will be successful in:

integrating an acquired brand’s distribution channels with our own;
coordinating sales force activities of an acquired brand or in selling the products of an acquired brand to our customer base; or
integrating an acquired brand into our management information systems or integrating an acquired brand’s products into our product mix.

Additionally, integrating an acquired brand into our existing operations will require management resources and may divert management’s attention from our day-to-day operations. If we are not successful in integrating the operations of acquired brands, our business could be harmed.

We may not be able to successfully consummate proposed divestitures.

We may, from time to time, divest businesses that become less of a strategic fit within our portfolio or no longer meet our growth or profitability targets. Our profitability may be impacted by gains or losses on the sales of such businesses, or lost operating income or cash flows from such businesses. Additionally, we may be required to record asset impairment or restructuring charges related to divested businesses, or indemnify buyers for liabilities, which may reduce our profitability and cash flows. We may also not be able to negotiate such divestitures on terms acceptable to us. Such potential divestitures will require management resources and may divert management’s attention from our day-to-day operations. If we are not successful in divesting such businesses, our business could be harmed.

14




We may be subject to significant liability should the consumption of any of our products cause illness or physical harm.

The sale of products for human use and consumption involves the risk of injury or illness to consumers. Such injuries may result from inadvertent mislabeling, tampering by unauthorized third parties or product contamination or spoilage. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to recall or withdraw products, suspend production of our products or cease operations, which may lead to a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, customers may cancel orders for such products as a result of such events. Even if a situation does not necessitate a recall or market withdrawal, product liability claims might be asserted against us. While we are subject to governmental inspection and regulations and believe our facilities and those of our co-packers and suppliers comply in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations, if the consumption of any of our products causes, or is alleged to have caused, a health-related illness we may become subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or physical harm, including the risk of reputational harm being magnified and/or distorted through the rapid dissemination of information over the Internet, including through news articles, blogs, chat rooms and social media sites, could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and consumers and our corporate and brand image. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this type might not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others. We maintain product liability insurance in an amount that we believe to be adequate. However, we cannot be sure that we will not incur claims or liabilities for which we are not insured or that exceed the amount of our insurance coverage. A product liability judgment against us or a product recall could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations at one or moreliquidity.

Outbreaks of theseavian disease, such as avian influenza, or food-borne illnesses, could adversely affect our results of operations.

Demand for our poultry products can be adversely impacted by outbreaks of avian diseases, including avian influenza, or food-borne illnesses, such as E.coli or salmonella, which can have a significant impact on our financial results.  We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our poultry flocks are healthy and that our processing plants and other facilities operate in a sanitary and environmentally sound manner. Nevertheless, outbreaks of diseases and food-borne illnesses, which may be causedbeyond our control, could significantly affect demand for and price of our poultry products, consumer perceptions of certain of our poultry products, the availability of poults for purchase by work stoppages,us and our ability to conduct our Hain Pure Protein segment.  Moreover, an outbreak of disease outbreakscould have a significant effect on the poults or pandemics, actspoultry flocks we own by requiring us to, among other things, destroy any affected poults or poultry flocks.

Pending and future litigation may lead us to incur significant costs.

We are, or may become, party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of war, terrorism, fire, earthquakes, floodingbusiness, which may include lawsuits or claims relating to contracts, intellectual property, product recalls, product liability, the marketing and labeling of products, employment matters, environmental matters or other natural disasters at one or moreaspects of our business. Even when not merited, the defense of these facilities, could delaylawsuits may divert our management’s attention, and we may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits. In addition, we may be required to pay damage awards or postpone production of our products,settlements or become subject to injunctions or other equitable remedies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,financial position, cash flows or results of operationsoperations. The outcome of litigation is often difficult to predict, and financial condition until such time as the interruptionoutcome of operations is resolvedpending or an alternate source of production could be secured.
During fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, approximately 52%, 56% and 62%, respectively, of our revenue was derived from products manufactured at independent co-packers. In some cases an individual co-packerfuture litigation may produce all of our requirements for a particular brand. The success of our business depends, in part, on maintaining a strong sourcing and manufacturing platform. We believe there are a limited number of competent, high-quality co-packers in the industry, and if we were required to obtain additional or alternative co-packing agreements or arrangements in the future, we can provide no assurance that we would be able to do so on satisfactory terms in a timely manner. Therefore, the loss of one or more co-packers, disruptions or delays at a co-packer, or our failure to retain co-packers for newly acquired products or brands, could delay or postpone production of our products or reduce or eliminate the availability of some of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

Our future results of operations may be adversely affected by the availability of organic ingredients.

Our ability to ensure a continuing supply of organic ingredients at competitive prices depends on many factors beyond our control, such as the number and financial condition.size of farms that grow organic crops, climate conditions, changes in national and world economic conditions, currency fluctuations and forecasting adequate need of seasonal ingredients.
In addition, the success of our business depends, in large part, upon the establishment and maintenance of dependable transportation systems and a strong distribution network. A disruption in transportation services could result in an inability to supply materials to our or our co-packers' facilities. We utilize distribution centers which are managed by third parties. Activity at these distribution centers could be disrupted by a number of factors, including labor issues, failure to meet customer standards, acts of war, terrorism, fire, earthquakes, flooding or other natural disasters or bankruptcy or other financial issues affecting the third party providers. Any extended disruption
The organic ingredients that we use in the distributionproduction of our products (including, among others, fruits, vegetables, nuts and grains) are vulnerable to adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as floods, droughts, water scarcity, temperature extremes, frosts, earthquakes and pestilences. Natural disasters and adverse weather conditions (including the potential effects of climate change) can lowercrop yields and reduce crop size and crop quality, which in turn could have a material adverse effectreduce our supplies of organic ingredients or increase the prices of organic ingredients. If our supplies of organic ingredients are reduced, we may not be able to find enough supplemental supply sources on favorable terms, if at all, which could impact our business.ability to supply product to our customers and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


15



We also compete with other manufacturers in the procurement of organic product ingredients, which may be less plentiful in the open market than conventional product ingredients. This competition may increase in the future if consumer demand for organic products increases. This could cause our expenses to increase or could limit the amount of product that we can manufacture and sell.

If We Do Not Manage Our Supply Chain Effectively, Our Operating Results Maywe do not manage our supply chain effectively, our operating results may be Adversely Affectedadversely affected.

The inability of any supplier of raw materials, independent co-packer or third party distributor to deliver or perform for us in a timely or cost-effective manner could cause our operating costs to increase and our profit margins to decrease, especially as it relates to our products that have a short shelf life. We must continuously monitor our inventory and product mix against forecasted demand or risk having inadequate supplies to meet consumer demand as well as having too much inventory on hand that may reach its expiration date and become unsaleable. If we are unable to manage our supply chain efficiently and ensure that our products are available to meet consumer demand, our operating costs could increase and our profit margins could decrease.

Our Future Results of Operations May be Adversely Affected by the Availability of Organic Ingredients
Our ability to ensure a continuing supply of organic ingredients at competitive prices depends on many factors beyond our control, such as the number and size of farms that grow organic crops, climate conditions, changes in national and world economic conditions, currency fluctuations and forecasting adequate need of seasonal ingredients.
The organic ingredients that we use in the production of our products (including, among others, fruits, vegetables, nuts and grains) are vulnerable to adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as floods, droughts, frosts, earthquakes and pestilences. Adverse weather conditions and natural disasters can lower crop yields and reduce crop size and crop quality, which in turn could reduce our supplies of organic ingredients or increase the prices of organic ingredients. If our supplies of organic ingredients are reduced, we may not be able to find enough supplemental supply sources on favorable terms, if at all, which could impact our ability to supply product to our customers and adversely affect our business, financial condition andfuture results of operations.
We also compete with other manufacturers in the procurement of organic product ingredients, whichoperations may be less plentiful in the open market than conventional product ingredients. This competition may increase in the future if consumer demand for organic products increases. This could cause our expenses to increase or could limit the amount of product that we can manufactureadversely affected by volatile raw materials, commodity costs and sell.fuel.

Our Future Results of Operations May be Adversely Affected by Increased Fuel, Raw Materials and Commodity Costs
Many aspects of our business have been, and may continue to be, directly affected by the rising cost of fuel and commodities. Increased fuelvolatile commodity costs, translate into increased costs for the products and services we receive from our third party providers including but not limited to, increased distribution costs for our products and increased packaging costs.fuel. Agricultural commodities and ingredients, including wheat,almonds, corn, dairy, fruit and vegetables, oils, rice, soybeans nuts and oils,wheat are the principal inputs used in our products. These items are subject to price volatility which can be caused by commodity market fluctuations, crop yields, seasonal cycles, weather conditions (including the potential effects of climate change), temperature extremes and natural disasters (including floods, droughts, water scarcity, frosts, earthquakes and hurricanes), pest and disease problems,

13


changes in currency exchange rates, imbalances between supply and demand, natural disasters and government programs and policies among other factors. Volatile fuel costs translate into unpredictable costs for the products and services we receive from our third party providers including, but not limited to, distribution costs for our products and packaging costs. We seek to offset the impactvolatility of these cost increasessuch costs with a combination of cost savings initiatives, operating efficiencies and price increases to our customers. However, if we are unable to fully offset the volatility of such cost increasescosts, our financial results could be adversely affected.

The ProfitabilityClimate change may negatively affect our business and operations.

There is concern that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns and the frequency and severity of extreme weather and natural disasters. In the event that such climate change has a negative effect on agricultural productivity, we may be subject to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commodities that are necessary for our products, such as corn, oats, rice, wheat and various fruits and vegetables. As a result of climate change, we may also be subjected to decreased availability of water, deteriorated quality of water or less favorable pricing for water, which could adversely impact our manufacturing and distribution operations.

Our Operationsability to offset the impact of cost input inflation on our operations is Dependentpartially dependent on Our Abilityour ability to Implementimplement and Achieve Targeted Savingsachieve targeted savings and Efficienciesefficiencies from Cost Reduction Initiativescost reduction initiatives.

We continuously initiate productivity plansseek to put in place initiatives which are designed to control or reduce costs or that increase operating efficiencies in order to improve our profitability and offset many of the input cost increases which are outside of our control. Our success depends on our ability to execute and realize cost savings and efficiencies from our operations. If we are unable to identify and fully implement our productivity plans and achieve our anticipated efficiencies our profitability may be adversely impacted.

Our profit margins also depend on our ability to manage our inventory efficiently. As part of our effort to manage our inventory more efficiently, we carry out stock-keeping unit (“SKU”)SKU rationalization programs from time to time, which may result in the discontinuation of numerous lower-margin or low-turnover SKUs. However, a number of factors, such as changes in customers'customers’ inventory levels, access to shelf space and changes in consumer preferences, may lengthen the number of days we carry certain inventories, hence impeding our effort to manage our inventory efficiently and thereby increasing our costs.


16



Interruption in, disruption of or loss of operations at one or more of our manufacturing facilities could harm our business.

For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, approximately 61%, 57% and 55%, respectively, of our revenue was derived from products manufactured at our own manufacturing facilities. An interruption in, disruption of or the loss of operations at one or more of these facilities, which may be caused by work stoppages, governmental actions, disease outbreaks or pandemics, acts of war, terrorism, fire, earthquakes, flooding or other natural disasters at one or more of these facilities, could delay or postpone production of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition until such time as the interruption of operations is resolved or an alternate source of production could be secured. In addition, if one or more of our manufacturing facilities are running at full capacity and we are unable to keep up with customer demand, we may not be able to fulfill orders on time or at all which could adversely impact our business.

Loss of one or more of our independent co-packers could adversely affect our business.

During fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, approximately 39%, 43% and 45%, respectively, of our revenue was derived from products manufactured at independent co-packers. In some cases an individual co-packer may produce all of our requirements for a particular brand. The success of our business depends, in part, on maintaining a strong sourcing and manufacturing platform. We believe there are a limited number of competent, high-quality co-packers in the industry and many of our co-packers produce products for other companies as well. If we were required to obtain additional or alternative co-packing agreements or arrangements in the future, we can provide no assurance that we would be able to do so on satisfactory terms in a timely manner. Therefore, if we lose or need to change one or more co-packers, experience disruptions or delays at a co-packer, or fail to retain co-packers for newly acquired products or brands, production of our products may be delayed or postponed and/or the availability of some of our products may be reduced or eliminated, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Disruption of our transportation systems could harm our business.

The success of our business depends, in large part, upon dependable transportation systems and a strong distribution network. A disruption in transportation services could result in an inability to supply materials to our or our co-packers’ facilities, or finished products to our distribution centers or customers. We utilize distribution centers which are managed by third parties. Activity at these distribution centers could be disrupted by a number of factors, including labor issues, failure to meet customer standards, acts of war, terrorism, fire, earthquakes, flooding or other natural disasters or bankruptcy or other financial issues affecting the third party providers. Any extended disruption in the distribution of our products or an increase in the cost of these services could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may face difficulties as we expand our operations into countries in which we have no prior operating experience.

We intend to continue to expand our global footprint in order to enter into new markets. This may involve expanding into countries other than those in which we currently operate. It may involve expanding into less developed countries, which may have less political, social or economic stability and less developed infrastructure and legal systems. It is costly to establish, develop and maintain international operations and develop and promote our brands in international markets. As we expand our business into new countries we may encounter regulatory, personnel, technological and other difficulties that increase our expenses or delay our ability to become profitable in such countries. This may have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are Subjectsubject to Risks Associatedrisks associated with Our International Salesour international sales and Operations, Including Foreign Currency Risksoperations, including foreign currency risks.

Operating in international markets involves exposure to movements in currency exchange rates, which are volatile at times. The economic impact of currency exchange rate movements is complex because such changes are often linked to variability in real growth, inflation, interest rates, governmental actions and other factors. Consequently, isolating the effect of changes in currency does not incorporate these other important economic factors. These changes, if material, could cause adjustments to our financing and operating strategies.

We hold assets and incur liabilities, earn revenue, and pay expenses in a variety of currencies other than the United States dollar, primarily the British pound, Canadian dollar and the Euro. Our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, and therefore we must translate the assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses into United States dollars for external reporting purposes. As a result, changes in the value of the U.S. dollar during a period may unpredictably and adversely impact our consolidated operating results, and our asset and liability balances and our cash flows in our consolidated financial statements, even if their value has not changed in their original currency.


17


During fiscal 2012, approximately 28.1%2015, 41% of our consolidated net sales were generated outside the United States, while such sales outside the United States were 17.9%40% of net sales in 20112014 and 18.9%37% in 2010.2013. Sales from outside our United States markets may continue to represent a significant portion of our total net sales in the future. Our non-U.S. sales and operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business abroad, many of which are outside our control, including:

periodic economic downturns and the instability of governments, including default or deterioration in the threatcredit worthiness of local governments, geopolitical regional conflicts, terrorist activity, political unrest, civil strife, acts of war, terrorist attacks, epidemic or civil unrest;
price and foreign currency exchange controls;
fluctuations in the relative values of currencies;
unexpected changes in trading policies, regulatory requirements, tariffspublic corruption, expropriation and other barriers;
compliance with applicable foreign laws;
the imposition of tariffseconomic or quotas;
changes in tax laws; andpolitical uncertainties;
difficulties in managing a global enterprise, including staffing, collecting accounts receivable and managing distributors.
distributors;
compliance with U.S. laws affecting operations outside of the United States, such as OFAC trade sanction regulations and anti-boycott regulations;
compliance with antitrust and competition laws, data privacy laws, and a variety of other local, national and multi-national regulations and laws in multiple regimes;
pandemics, such as the flu, which may adversely affect our workforce as well as our local suppliers and customers;
earthquakes, tsunamis, floods or other major disasters that may limit the supply of products that we purchase abroad;
changes in tax laws, interpretation of tax laws, tax audit outcomes and potentially burdensome taxation;
fluctuations in currency values, especially in emerging markets;
changes in capital controls, including price and currency exchange controls;
discriminatory or conflicting fiscal policies;
varying abilities to enforce intellectual property and contractual rights;
greater risk of uncollectible accounts and longer collection cycles;
design and implementation of effective control environment processes across our diverse operations and employee base;
tariffs, quotas, trade barriers, other trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements imposed by governments that might negatively affect our sales;
foreign currency exchange and transfer restrictions;
increased costs, disruptions in shipping or reduced availability of freight transportation;
differing labor standards;
difficulties and costs associated with complying with U.S. laws and regulations applicable to entities with overseas operations;
the threat that our operations or property could be subject to nationalization and expropriation;
varying regulatory, tax, judicial and administrative practices in the jurisdictions where we operate; and
difficulties associated with operating under a wide variety of complex foreign laws, treaties and regulations.

Our Inability to Use Our Trademarks Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business
We believe that brand awareness is a significant component in a consumer's decision to purchase one product over anotherAn impairment in the highly competitive food, beveragecarrying value of goodwill or other acquired intangible assets could materially and personal care industries. Although we endeavor to protectadversely affect our trademarks and trade names, there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful, or that third parties will not challenge our right to use one or more of our trademarks or trade names. We believe that our trademarks and trade names are significant to the marketing and sale of our products and that the inability to utilize certain of these names could have a material adverse affect on our business,consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, we market products under brands licensed under trademark license agreements, including Linda McCartney®, the Sesame Street name and logo and other Sesame Street intellectual property on certain of our Earth's Best® products, and Candle

14


Cafe™ brand. We believe that these trademarks have significant value and are instrumental in our ability to create and sustain demand for and to market those products offerings. We cannot assure you that these trademark license agreements will remain in effect and enforceable or that any license agreements, upon expiration, can be renewed on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, any future disputes concerning these trademark license agreements may cause us to incur significant litigation costs or force us to suspend use of the disputed trademarks and suspend sales of products using such trademarks.net worth.

New or Existing Government Regulations Could Adversely Affect Our Business
We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and other countries where we manufacture, distribute and/or sell our food, beverage, personal care, and household products. These laws and regulations apply to many aspects of our operations, including the manufacture, packaging, labeling, distribution, advertising, and sale of our products.
We comply with regulatory requirements set forth by the FDA, USDA, FTC, EPA, Canadian Food Inspection Agency (“CFIA”) and other foreign regulators as well as state and local government agencies. The U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act passed in January 2011 grants the FDA greater authority over the safety of the national food supply with a specific emphasis on imported foods, which may cause delays on imported ingredients and finished goods. In addition, we advertise our products and could be the target of claims relating to false or deceptive advertising under foreign laws and U.S. federal and state laws, including the consumer protection statutes of some states.
As a publicly traded company, we are further subject to changing rules and regulations of federal and state government as well as the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed. These entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and the NASDAQ® Global Select Market, have issued a significant number of new and increasingly complex requirements and regulations over the course of the last several years and continue to develop additional regulations and requirements in response to laws recently enacted by Congress. Our efforts to comply with these requirements have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, an increase in expenses and a diversion of management's time from other business activities.
Several proposed regulatory activities may have an adverse effect on our business:
The USDA’s National Organic Program (“NOP”) is reevaluating the use and certification of accessory nutrients in organic foods and defining organic personal care standards.
The growth in international markets requires organic equivalence agreements, which have already been established between the United States and Canada as well as the European Union and Canada, in an effort to reduce and potentially eliminate trade barriers across the globe.
The FDA’s Safe Cosmetics Act of 2011 would ensure that personal care products are formulated with ingredients deemed safe by regulatory authorities and that all ingredients are fully disclosed on package labels.
State legislative initiatives, including the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, known as Proposition 65, which defines maximum daily exposure levels of substances that may cause developmental or cancer risk in individuals. Where research efforts have failed to reduce chemicals like acrylamide that are naturally produced in fried and roasted products, warning labels may be required at point-of-sale for food and beverage products. Additionally, while we have commercialized BPA-free packaging for many of our products, there are no alternatives to metal can linings used in acidic products at this time. Although the FDA currently allows the use of BPA in food packaging materials, public reports and concerns regarding the potential hazards of BPA could contribute to a perceived safety risk for products packaged using BPA.
Legislative and regulatory authorities in the United States, Canada and internationally will likely require manufacturers to consider using alternative energy sources to minimize climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

We do not know whether or not any of the above will be realized and/or to what degree these proposed regulatory changes may impact our domestic and international food and personal care products. Any change in manufacturing, labeling or packaging requirements for our products may lead to an increase in costs, interruptions or delays, any of which could adversely affect the operations and financial condition of our business.

New or revised government laws and regulations as well as increased enforcement by government agencies could result in additional compliance costs; civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, withdrawals, recalls or seizures; and confiscations as well as potential criminal sanctions, any of which could adversely affect the operations and financial condition of our business.

Pending legislative initiatives and newly adopted legislation, such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in the

15


areas of healthcare reform and other initiatives and legislation in the area of taxation of foreign profits, executive compensation and corporate governance could also increase our costs.

Failure by Co-packers or Suppliers of Raw Materials to Comply with Food Safety, Environmental or Other Regulations may Disrupt our Supply of Certain Products and Adversely Affect our Business
Our co-packers and other suppliers are subject to a number of regulations, including food safety and environmental regulations. Failure by any of our co-packers or other suppliers to comply with regulations, or allegations of compliance failure, may disrupt their operations. Disruption of the operations of a co-packer or other suppliers could disrupt our supply of product or raw materials, which could have an adverse effect on our business or consolidated results of operations. Additionally, actions we may take to mitigate the impact of any such disruption or potential disruption, including increasing inventory in anticipation of a potential production or supply interruption, may adversely affect our business or consolidated results of operations.

If the Reputation of One or More of Our Leading Brands Erodes Significantly, it Could Have a Material Impact on Our Results of Operations
Our financial success is directly dependent on the consumer perception of our brands. The success of our brands may suffer if our marketing plans or product initiatives do not have the desired impact on a brand's image or its ability to attract consumers. Further, our results could be negatively impacted if one of our brands suffers a substantial impediment to its reputation due to real or perceived quality issues or the Company is perceived to act in an irresponsible manner.

We May be Subject to Significant Liability Should the Consumption of Any of Our Products Cause Illness or Physical Harm
The sale of products for human use and consumption involves the risk of injury or illness to consumers. Such injuries may result from inadvertent mislabeling, tampering by unauthorized third parties or product contamination or spoilage. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to recall or withdraw products, which may lead to a material adverse effect on our business. Even if a situation does not necessitate a recall or market withdrawal, product liability claims might be asserted against us. While we are subject to governmental inspection and regulations and believe our facilities and those of our co-packers and suppliers comply in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations, if the consumption of any of our products causes, or is alleged to have caused, a health-related illness in the future we may become subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or physical harm, including the risk of reputational harm being magnified and/or distorted through the rapid dissemination of information over the Internet, including through news articles, blogs, chat rooms and social media sites, could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and consumers and our corporate and brand image. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this sort might not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others. We maintain product liability insurance in an amount that we believe to be adequate. However, we cannot be sure that we will not incur claims or liabilities for which we are not insured or that exceed the amount of our insurance coverage. A product liability judgment against us or a product recall could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

We Rely on Independent Certification for a Number of Our Products
We rely on independent certification, such as certifications of our products as “organic” or “kosher,” to differentiate our products from others. The loss of any independent certifications could adversely affect our market position as a natural and organic products company, which could harm our business.
We must comply with the requirements of independent organizations or certification authorities in order to label our products as certified. For example, we can lose our “organic” certification if a manufacturing plant becomes contaminated with non-organic materials, or if it is not properly cleaned after a production run. In addition, all raw materials must be certified organic. Similarly, we can lose our “kosher” certification if a manufacturing plant and raw materials do not meet the requirements of the appropriate kosher supervision organization.

Due to the Seasonality of Many of Our Products and Other Factors, Our Results of Operations Are Subject to Quarterly Fluctuations
We manufacture and market hot tea products and, as a result, our quarterly results of operations reflect seasonal trends resulting from increased demand for our hot tea products in the cooler months of the year. In addition, some of our other products (e.g., baking and cereal products and soups) also show stronger sales in the cooler months while our snack food product lines and certain of our prepared food products are stronger in the warmer months.
Quarterly fluctuations in our sales volume and results of operations are due to a number of factors relating to our business,

16


including the timing of trade promotions, advertising and consumer promotions and other factors, such as seasonality, inclement weather and unanticipated increases in labor, commodity, energy or other operating costs. The impact on sales volume and results of operations due to the timing and extent of these factors can significantly impact our business. For these reasons, you should not rely on our quarterly results of operations as indications of our future performance.

An Impairment in the Carrying Value of Goodwill or Other Acquired Intangible Assets Could Materially and Adversely Affect our Consolidated Results of Operations and Net Worth
As of June 30, 2012,2015, we had approximately $1.01$1.78 billion of goodwill and other intangible assets (primarily indefinite-lived intangible assets associated with our brands) on our balance sheet as a result of the acquisitions we have made since our inception. The value of these intangible assets depends on a variety of factors, including the success of our business, market conditions, earnings growth and expected cash flows. Impairments to these intangibles may be caused by factors outside of our control, such as increasing competitive pricing pressures, changes in discount rates based on changes in market interest rates or lower than expected sales and profit growth rates. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, we are required to perform impairment tests on our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually or at any time when events occur which could impact the value of our reporting units or our indefinite-lived brands.intangible assets. Impairment analysis and measurement is a process that requires considerable judgment. We determine the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangibles using the relief from royalty method. Significant and unanticipated changes in the value of our reporting units or our indefinite-lived intangible assets could require a charge for impairment in a future period that could substantially affect our consolidated earnings in the period of such charge. In addition, such charges would reduce our consolidated net worth.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we recorded pre-tax non-cash
Future events may occur that could require future impairment charges totaling $14.9 million related to certain long-lived assets of businesses being held for sale which are classified as discontinued operations (see Note 18, Discontinued Operations). Our reviews in fiscal 2010, 2011 and 2012 did not indicate an impairment related to our continuing operations; however, ifcharges. If our common stock price trades below book value per share for a sustained period, if there are changes in market conditions or a future downturn in our business, or if future interim or annual impairment tests indicate an impairment of our goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets, we may have to recognize additional non-cash impairment charges which may materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and net worth. For further details, see Note 7, Goodwill


18


Our inability to use our trademarks could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We believe that brand awareness is a significant component in a consumer’s decision to purchase one product over another in the highly competitive food, beverage and Other Intangible Assets,personal care industries. Although we endeavor to protect our consolidatedtrademarks and trade names, there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful, or that third parties will not challenge our right to use one or more of our trademarks or trade names. We believe that our trademarks and trade names are significant to the marketing and sale of our products and that the inability to utilize certain of these names could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial statementscondition.

In addition, we market products under brands licensed under trademark license agreements, including Linda McCartney®, the Sesame Street name and logo and other Sesame Workshop intellectual property on certain of our Earth’s Best® products, Cadbury®, Rose’s® and Candle Cafe™ brand. We believe that these trademarks have significant value and are instrumental in our ability to create and sustain demand for and to market those products offerings. We cannot assure you that these trademark license agreements will remain in effect and enforceable or that any license agreements, upon expiration, can be renewed on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, any future disputes concerning these trademark license agreements may cause us to incur significant litigation costs or force us to suspend use of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.disputed trademarks and suspend sales of products using such trademarks.

If the reputation of one or more of our leading brands erodes significantly, it could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Our financial success is directly dependent on the consumer perception of our brands. The success of our brands may suffer if our marketing plans or product initiatives do not have the desired impact on a brand’s image or its ability to attract consumers. Further, our results could be negatively impacted if one of our brands suffers a substantial impediment to its reputation due to real or perceived quality issues or the Company is perceived to act in an irresponsible manner. In addition, it is possible for such information, misperceptions, and opinions to be shared quickly and disseminated widely due to the continued growing use of social and digital media.

We are subject to U.S and international regulations that could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are subject to extensive regulations in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Europe and any other countries where we manufacture, distribute and/or sell our products. Our products are subject to numerous food safety and other laws and regulations relating to the sourcing, manufacturing, storing, labeling, marketing, advertising, and distributing of these products. Enforcement of existing laws and regulations, changes in legal requirements, and/or evolving interpretations of existing regulatory requirements, may result in increased compliance costs and create other obligations, financial or otherwise, that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

With our expanding international operations, we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws. The FCPA and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials or other third parties for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. While our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, we cannot provide assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will always protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, joint-venture partners or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations relating to hazardous materials, substances and waste used in or resulting from our operations. Liabilities or claims with respect to environmental matters could have a significant negative impact on our business.

As with other companies engaged in similar businesses, the nature of our operations expose us to the risk of liabilities and claims with respect to environmental matters, including those relating to the disposal and release of hazardous substances. Furthermore, our operations are governed by laws and regulations relating to workplace safety and worker health which, among other things, regulate employee exposure to hazardous chemicals in the workplace. Any material costs incurred in connection with such liabilities or claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Any environmental or health and safety legislation or regulations enacted in the future, or any changes in how existing or future laws or regulations will be enforced, administered or interpreted may lead to an increase in compliance costs or expose us to additional risk of liabilities and claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

19



We rely on independent certification for a number of our products.

We rely on independent certification, such as certifications of our products as “organic”, “Non-GMO”, or “kosher,” to differentiate our products from others. The loss of any independent certifications could adversely affect our market position as an organic and natural products company, which could harm our business.

We must comply with the requirements of independent organizations or certification authorities in order to label our products as certified. For example, we can lose our “organic” certification if a manufacturing plant becomes contaminated with non-organic materials, or if it is not properly cleaned after a production run. In addition, all raw materials must be certified organic. Similarly, we can lose our “kosher” certification if a manufacturing plant and raw materials do not meet the requirements of the appropriate kosher supervision organization.

If our security measures are breached, we may face liability, and public perception of our business could be diminished, which would negatively impact our results of operations.

Although we have implemented physical and electronic security measures to protect against the loss, misuse and alteration of our proprietary business information and systems as well as personally identifiable information of our customers and vendors, no security measures are perfect and impenetrable and we may be unable to anticipate or prevent unauthorized access. A security breach could occur due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, malfeasance or a combination of these or other actions. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs directly, or indirectly through our third-party service providers, we could lose competitively sensitive business information or suffer disruptions to our business operations. In addition, the public perception of the effectiveness of our security measures or business could be harmed, and we could suffer financial exposure in connection with remediation efforts, investigations and legal proceedings and changes in our security and system protection measures.

Our business operations could be disrupted if our information technology systems fail to perform adequately.

The efficient operation of our business depends on our information technology systems. We rely on our information technology systems to effectively manage our business data, communications, supply chain, order entry and fulfillment, and other business processes. The failure of our information technology systems to perform as we anticipate could disrupt our business and could result in transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, and the loss of sales and customers, causing our business and results of operations to suffer. In addition, our information technology systems may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from circumstances beyond our control, including fire, natural disasters, and system failures and viruses. Any such damage or interruption could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Global capital and credit market issues could negatively affect our liquidity, increase our costs of borrowing, and disrupt the operations of our suppliers and customers.

We depend on stable, liquid and well-functioning capital and credit markets to fund our operations. Although we believe that our operating cash flows, financial assets, access to capital and credit markets and revolving credit agreement will permit us to meeting our financing needs for the foreseeable future, there can be no assurance that future volatility or disruption in the capital and credit markets and the state of the economy, including the food and beverage industry, will not impair our liquidity or increase our costs of borrowing. Such disruptions could require us to take measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until alternative credit arrangements or other funding for our business needs can be arranged. Our business could also be negatively impacted if our suppliers or customers experience disruptions resulting from tighter capital and credit markets or a slowdown in the general economy.

We may be subject to significant liability that is not covered by insurance.

We believe that the extent of our insurance coverage is consistent with industry practice. However, any claim under our insurance policies may be subject to certain exceptions, may not be honored fully, in part, in a timely manner, or at all, and we may not have purchased sufficient insurance to cover all losses incurred. If we were to incur substantial liabilities or if our business operations were interrupted for a substantial period of time, we could incur costs and suffer losses. Such inventory and business interruption losses may not be covered by our insurance policies. Additionally, in the future, insurance coverage may not be available to us at commercially acceptable premiums, or at all.


20


Joint Ventures That We Enter Into Presentventures that we enter into present a Numbernumber of Risksrisks and Challenges That Could Havechallenges that could have a Material Adverse Effectmaterial adverse effect on Our Businessour business and Resultsresults of Operationsoperations.

As part of our business strategy, we have made minority interest investments and established joint ventures. These transactions typically involve a number of risks and present financial and other challenges, including the existence of unknown potential disputes, liabilities or contingencies and changes in the industry, location or political environment in which these investments are located, that may arise after entering into such arrangements. We could experience financial or other setbacks if these transactions encounter unanticipated problems, including problems related to execution by the management of the companies underlying these investments. Any of these risks could adversely affect our results of operations.
Additionally, we are a minority equity owner in HPP. Because we do not own a majority or maintain voting control of HPP, we do not have the
Our ability to control its policies, management or affairs. The management team of HPP could make business decisions without our consent that could impair the economic value of our investment in HPP. Any such diminution in the value of our investment could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.issue preferred stock may deter takeover attempts.

Our Business Operations Could Be Disrupted If Our Information Technology Systems Fail to Perform Adequately
The efficient operation of our business depends on our information technology systems. We rely on our information technology systems to effectively manage our business data, communications, supply chain, order entry and fulfillment, and other business processes. The failure of our information technology systems to perform as we anticipate could disrupt our business and could result in transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, and the loss of sales and customers, causing our business and results of operations to suffer. In addition, our information technology systems may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from circumstances beyond our control, including fire, natural disasters, system failures, security breaches, and viruses. Any such damage or interruption could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement Concerning Marketing and Labeling of Food Products Could Have a Material Impact on Our Results of Operations
The marketing and labeling of food and personal care products in recent years has brought increased risk that consumers will bring class action lawsuits and that the FTC and/or state attorneys general will bring legal action concerning the truth and accuracy of the marketing and labeling of the product. For example, although the FDA and USDA have each issued statements regarding the appropriate use of the word “natural,” there is no single, U.S. government-regulated definition of the term

17


“natural” for use in the food and personal care industry. The resulting uncertainty has led to consumer confusion and legal challenges. Plaintiffs have commenced legal actions against a number of food companies that market “natural” products, asserting false, misleading and deceptive advertising and labeling claims. Additional examples of causes of action that may be asserted in a consumer class action lawsuit include fraud, deceptive and unfair trade practices, and breach of state consumer protection statutes (such as Proposition 65 in California). The FTC and/or a state attorney general may bring legal action that seeks removal of a product from the market, warnings, fines and penalties. Even when not merited, class actions, proceedings by the FTC or state attorney general enforcement actions can be expensive to defend and adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and consumers as well as damage to our brands.

Our Officers and Directors and 10% or Greater Beneficial Owners May Be Able to Control Our Actions
Our officers and directors and 10% or greater beneficial owners, including the Icahn Group, beneficially owned (assuming the exercise of all stock options held by our officers and directors) approximately 20.9% of our common stock as of June 30, 2012. Accordingly, our officers and directors and 10% or greater beneficial owners may be in a position to influence the election of our directors and otherwise influence stockholder action.
In addition, on July 7, 2010, we entered into an agreement with certain investment funds managed by Carl C. Icahn, or the Icahn Group (the “Icahn Group”). Pursuant to our agreement with the Icahn Group, we have approved the Icahn Group becoming the beneficial owner of 15%, but not more than 20%, of our common stock on the condition that the definition of “interested stockholder” in Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law is deemed amended to substitute 20% for 15%, and Section 203, as so amended, is applicable to, and in full force and effect, for the Icahn Group and us. According to the Form 4 filed by the Icahn Group on March 17, 2011, the Icahn Group beneficially owned an aggregate of 7,130,563 shares of our common stock or 15.9% of our outstanding common stock (based upon the 44,955,920 shares of our common stock outstanding as of August 20, 2012). As a result, the Icahn Group could increase its beneficial ownership of our common stock.
The Icahn Group could be in a position to influence the election of our directors or otherwise influence stockholder action, including, without limitation, whether, with whom and the terms on which we could engage in a change in control transaction, which could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control.

Our Ability to Issue Preferred Stock May Deter Takeover Attempts
Our board of directors is empowered to issue, without stockholder approval, preferred stock with dividends, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights which could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to holders of our common stock and adversely affect the relative voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock. In the event of issuance, the preferred stock could be used as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock with such designations, rights and preferences as may be determined from time-to-time by our board of directors. Although we have no present intention to issue any shares of our preferred stock, we may do so in the future under appropriate circumstances.


Item 1B.     Unresolved Staff Comments

None.


1821




Item 2.         Properties

Our primaryprincipal facilities, which are leased except where otherwise indicated, are as follows:
Primary Use Location 
Approximate
Square Feet
 
Expiration
of Lease
Headquarters office Melville, NY 35,000
 2012
Headquarters office (beginning 2013) Lake Success, NY 86,000
 2028
Manufacturing and offices (Tea) Boulder, CO 158,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and distribution (Grocery) Hereford, TX 136,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Frozen foods) West Chester, PA 105,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Vegetable chips) Moonachie, NJ 75,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and distribution center (Snack products) Lancaster, PA 100,000
 2017
Manufacturing and distribution (Grocery) Shreveport, LA 37,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Personal care) Culver City, CA 24,000
 2015
Manufacturing (Meat-alternatives) Boulder, CO 21,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Nut butters) Ashland, OR 13,000
 Owned
Distribution center (Grocery, snacks and personal care products) Ontario, CA 375,000
 2014
Distribution center (Snack products) Landisville, PA 56,000
 2013
Distribution center (Tea) Boulder, CO 81,000
 2014
Distribution center (Meat-alternatives) Boulder, CO 45,000
 Month to month
Distribution center (Personal care) Culver City, CA 26,000
 2015
Manufacturing and offices (Meat-alternatives) Vancouver, BC, Canada 76,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Soymilk & other non-dairy products) Eitorf, Germany 46,000
 2012
Manufacturing (Fresh prepared food products) Brussels, Belgium 20,000
 2013
Manufacturing and offices (Organic food products) Andiran, France 39,000
 Owned
Distribution (Organic food products) Nerrac, France 18,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and distribution (Crackers) Larvik, Norway 16,000
 2019
Manufacturing and offices (Fresh prepared food products) Luton, England 97,000
 2015
Manufacturing (Hot-eating desserts) Clitheroe, England 38,000
 2018
Manufacturing and offices (Fresh fruit and salads) Leeds, England 37,000
 2022
Manufacturing (Chilled soups) Grimsby, England 61,000
 2029
Manufacturing (Chilled soups) Peterborough, England 54,000
 (1)
Distribution Peterborough, England 35,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Meat-free frozen products) Fakenham, England 101,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Juices, Smoothies and Ingredients) Ashford, England 53,000
 Owned
Primary Use Location Approximate Square Feet Expiration of Lease
United States:      
Headquarters office Lake Success, NY 86,000
 2029
Manufacturing and offices (Tea) Boulder, CO 158,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and distribution (Flours and grains) Hereford, TX 136,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Frozen foods, pouch filling and cold-pressed juice drinks) West Chester, PA 105,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Snack products) Moonachie, NJ 75,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and distribution center (Snack products) Mountville, PA 100,000
 2017
Manufacturing and distribution (Pasta) Shreveport, LA 37,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Personal care) Culver City, CA 24,000
 2016
Manufacturing (Meat-alternatives) Boulder, CO 21,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Nut butters) Ashland, OR 13,000
 Owned
Distribution center (Grocery, snacks, and personal care products) Ontario, CA 375,000
 2015
Manufacturing and distribution (Tea) Boulder, CO 81,000
 2019
Distribution center (Meat-alternatives) Boulder, CO 45,000
 Month to month
Manufacturing and distribution (Breads, buns, and related products) Boulder, CO 69,000
 2020
Manufacturing and distribution (Cold-pressed juice drinks) Hawthorne, CA 17,000
 2016
       
United Kingdom:      
Manufacturing and offices (Ambient grocery products) Histon, England 303,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Classic rice products) Rainham, England 80,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Ready-to-heat rice products) Rainham, England 69,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Fresh prepared fruit products) Luton, England 97,000
 2015
Manufacturing (Hot-eating desserts) Clitheroe, England 38,000
 2026
Manufacturing (Fresh fruit and salads) Leeds, England 37,000
 2022
Manufacturing (Chilled soups) Grimsby, England 61,000
 2029
Manufacturing (Chilled soups) Peterborough, England 54,000
 2020
Manufacturing (Desserts and meat-free frozen products) Fakenham, England 101,000
 Owned
Manufacturing (Juices, smoothies and ingredients) Ashford, England 53,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and distribution (Crackers) Larvik, Norway 16,000
 2019
(1) Lease term currently in process

22



Hain Pure Protein:      
Manufacturing and offices (Protein products) Fredericksburg, PA 58,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Protein products) Fredericksburg, PA 60,000
 Owned
Distribution and offices (Protein products) New Oxford, PA 20,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Protein products) New Oxford, PA 130,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Protein products) Liverpool, NY 15,000
 Owned
Manufacturing, distribution and offices (Kosher protein products) Mifflintown, PA 240,000
 Owned
Manufacturing, distribution and offices (Feed mill) Sellinsgrove, PA 21,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Poultry hatchery) Beaver Springs, PA 32,500
 Owned
       
Rest of World:      
Manufacturing (Meat-alternatives) Vancouver, BC, Canada 76,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Personal care) Mississauga, ON, Canada 61,000
 2020
Distribution (Personal care) Mississauga, ON, Canada 56,000
 2016
Manufacturing, distribution and offices (Plant-based beverages) Troisdorf, Germany 131,000
 2027
Manufacturing and offices (Organic food products) Andiran, France 39,000
 Owned
Distribution (Organic food products) Nerrac, France 18,000
 Owned
Manufacturing and offices (Plant-based foods and beverages) Oberwart, Austria 108,000
 Unlimited
Manufacturing (Plant-based foods and beverages) Schwerin, Germany 650,000
 Owned


We also lease space for other smaller offices and facilities in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Europe and Europe.other parts of the world.

In addition to the foregoing distribution facilities operated by us, we also utilize bonded public warehouses from which deliveries are made to customers.

For further information regarding our lease obligations, see Note 15,16, Commitments and Contingencies.Contingencies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For further information regarding the use of our properties by segments, see Item 1, Business - Production.



1923




Item 3.         Legal Proceedings

FromOn May 11, 2011, Rosminah Brown, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated individuals, as well as a non-profit organization, filed a putative class action in the Superior Court of California, Alameda County against the Company.  The complaint alleged that the labels of certain Avalon Organics® brand and JASON® brand personal care products used prior to the Company’s implementation of ANSI/NSF-305 certification in mid-2011 violated certain California statutes.  Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.  The action was consolidated with a subsequently-filed putative class action containing substantially identical allegations concerning only the JASON® brand personal care products. 

The consolidated actions sought an award for damages, injunctive relief, costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. The consolidated lawsuits were certified as a class action by the trial court in November 2014. In July 2015, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle the class action for $7.5 million in addition to the distribution of consumer coupons up to a value of $2.0 million. The Company is currently working to finalize the matter.

In addition to the litigation described above, the Company is a defendant in lawsuits from time to time wein the normal course of business. While the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes the reasonably possible losses of such matters, individually and in the aggregate, are involved in litigation incidental tonot material. Additionally, the ordinary conductCompany believes the probable final outcome of our business. Disposition of pending litigation related to thesesuch matters iswill not expected by management to have a material adverse effect on our business,the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, cash flows or financial condition.liquidity.



Item 4.         Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


24




PART II


Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Outstanding shares of our Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “HAIN”. The following table sets forth the reported high and low sales prices for our Common Stock for each fiscal quarter from July 1, 20102013 through June 30, 2012.

2015.
Common StockCommon Stock
Fiscal Year 2012 Fiscal Year 2011Fiscal Year 2015 Fiscal Year 2014
High Low High LowHigh Low High Low
First Quarter$34.72
 $26.10
 $24.99
 $19.20
$51.99
 $40.83
 $42.74
 $32.38
Second Quarter38.47
 27.90
 28.49
 23.35
$60.45
 $48.31
 $45.71
 $36.17
Third Quarter44.82
 33.72
 33.25
 25.59
$66.35
 $51.95
 $49.42
 $40.01
Fourth Quarter57.42
 42.81
 37.24
 30.30
$68.76
 $57.61
 $47.68
 $41.38

Note: On December 29, 2014, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split of its common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend to shareholders of record as of December 12, 2014. The reported high and low sales prices for our Common Stock prior to the effective date have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.

As of August 20, 2012,17, 2015, there were 332280 holders of record of our Common Stock.

We have not paid any dividends on our Common Stock to date. We intend to retain all future earnings for use in the development of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of all dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, future earnings, operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, including restrictions under our credit facility and our outstanding senior notes, our general financial condition and general business conditions.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Period
(a)
Total number
of shares
purchased
 
(b)
Average
price paid
per share
 
(c)
Total number of
shares  purchased
as part of
publicly
announced plans
 
(d)
Maximum
number of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans
April 2012192
(1) 
$47.30
 
 
May 2012
 $
 
 
June 2012
 $
 
 
Total192
 $
 
 
Period
(a)
Total number
of shares
purchased (1)
 
(b)
Average
price paid
per share
 
(c)
Total number of
shares  purchased
as part of
publicly
announced plans
 
(d)
Maximum
number of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans
April 201565
 $64.25
 
 
May 2015225
 61.00
 
 
June 2015916
 65.90
 
 
Total1,206
 $64.89
 
 

(1)Shares surrendered for payment of employee payroll taxes due on shares issued under stockholder approved stock based compensation plans.


2025


Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth certain information, as of June 30, 2012, concerning shares of common stock authorized for issuance under all of the Company’s equity compensation plans.
Plan Category
(A)
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
 
(B)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
 
(C)
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (A)) (1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders2,580,433
 $18.00 3,566,443
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holdersNone None None
Total2,580,433
 $18.00 3,566,443

(1)Of the 3,566,443 shares available for future issuance under our equity compensation plans, 3,515,648 shares are available for grant under the Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan and 50,795 shares are available for grant under the 2000 Directors Stock Plan.


Performance Graph

The following graph compares the performance of our common stock to the S&P 500 Index and to the Standard & Poor’sS&P Packaged Foods and Meats Index (in which we are included) for the period from June 30, 20072010 through June 30, 2012.2015. The comparison assumes $100 invested on June 30, 2007.
2010.



2126




Item 6.        Selected Financial Data

The following information has been summarized from our financial statements. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below. Beginning on July 1, 2009, the revenues and expenses of HPP are no longer consolidated. Additionally, asAs described further in Note 18,5, Discontinued Operations, the Company made the decision during fiscal 2012 to sell its private-label chilled ready meals and sandwich operations in the United Kingdom, and as such,Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the results of thesecertain businesses have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Amounts are in thousands except for per share amounts. Additionally, the Company has completed several business combinations in recent years. Refer to Note 4, Acquisitions, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information regarding our recent business combinations.
 Fiscal Year ended June 30, Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 
2012 (a)
 2011 2010 
2009 (b)
 2008 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
Operating results:                    
Net sales $1,378,247
 $1,108,546
 $890,007
 $1,060,580
 $977,271
 $2,688,515
 $2,153,611
 $1,734,683
 $1,378,247
 $1,108,546
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. $94,214
 $58,971
 $38,191
 $(13,827) $33,396
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. $(14,989) $(3,989) $(9,572) $(10,896) $7,825
Net income (loss) attributable to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. $79,225
 $54,982
 $28,619
 $(24,723) $41,221
Income from continuing operations $167,896
 $141,480
 $119,793
 $94,214
 $58,971
(Loss) from discontinued operations $
 $(1,629) $(5,137) $(14,989) $(3,989)
Net income $167,896
 $139,851
 $114,656
 $79,225
 $54,982
                    
Basic net income per common share:          
Basic net income/(loss) per common share (a):
          
From continuing operations $2.12
 $1.37
 $0.93
 $(0.34) $0.83
 $1.65
 $1.45
 $1.30
 $1.06
 $0.69
From discontinued operations (0.33) (0.10) (0.23) (0.27) 0.20
 
 (0.02) (0.06) (0.17) (0.05)
Net income per common share - basic $1.79
 $1.27
 $0.70
 $(0.61) $1.03
 $1.65
 $1.43
 $1.24
 $0.89
 $0.64
                    
Diluted net income per common share:          
Diluted net income/(loss) per common share (a):
          
From continuing operations $2.05
 $1.32
 $0.92
 $(0.34) $0.80
 $1.62
 $1.42
 $1.26
 $1.03
 $0.66
From discontinued operations (0.32) (0.09) (0.23) (0.27) 0.19
 
 (0.02) (0.05) (0.16) (0.04)
Net income per common share - diluted $1.73
 $1.23
 $0.69
 $(0.61) $0.99
 $1.62
 $1.40
 $1.21
 $0.87
 $0.62
                    
Financial position:                    
Working capital $245,999
 $200,383
 $174,967
 $212,592
 $246,726
 $570,578
 $379,439
 $301,042
 $245,999
 $200,383
Total assets $1,673,593
 $1,333,504
 $1,198,087
 $1,123,496
 $1,259,384
 $3,097,270
 $2,965,317
 $2,258,494
 $1,673,593
 $1,333,504
Long-term debt $390,288
 $229,540
 $225,004
 $258,372
 $308,220
 $812,608
 $767,827
 $653,464
 $390,288
 $229,540
Stockholders’ equity $964,602
 $866,703
 $765,723
 $701,323
 $742,811
 $1,771,687
 $1,619,867
 $1,201,555
 $964,602
 $866,703

(a)
The loss from discontinued operationsOn December 29, 2014, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split of its common stock in fiscal 2012 includes impairment chargesthe form of $14.9 million, or $0.32 per diluted share.
(b)The net loss in fiscal 2009 includes goodwill and other intangibles impairment chargesa 100% stock dividend to shareholders of $52.6 million, or $1.20record as of December 12, 2014. All per share of which $14.4 million is included in discontinued operations.information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.



27




Item 7.        Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the June 30, 20122015 Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes and “ItemItem 1A. Risk Factors”Factors contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.2015. Forward-looking statements in this review are qualified by the cautionary statement included in this review under the sub-heading, “Note Regarding Forward Looking Information,” below. Operating results for the Company'sCompany’s private-label chilled ready meals and sandwich businesses, including the Daily BreadTMbrand name, in the United Kingdom, have been reclassifiedare classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

22



Overview

WeThe Hain Celestial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company,” and herein referred to as “we,” “us,” and “our”) manufacture, market, distribute and sell naturalorganic and organicnatural products under brand names which are sold as “better-for-you,”“better-for-you” products, providing consumers with the opportunity to lead A HealthyHealthier Way of LifeTM. We are a leader in many natural foodorganic and personal carenatural products categories, with an extensive portfolio of well-known brands. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company reorganized its reporting structure in a manner that resulted in a change to our operating and reportable segments. The change resulted from the Company's international expansion and was primarily driven by the acquisition of The Daniels Group in October 2011. Our operations are now organized and managed by geography, and are comprised of fourin five operating segments: United States, United Kingdom, Hain Pure Protein, Canada and Europe. The Company previously operated and reported in one segment. Prior period information has been recast to conform to the current year presentation. Our long-term business strategy is to integrate the brands in each of our segments under one management team and employ uniform marketing, sales and distribution strategies where possible. We market our products through a combination of direct sales personnel,people, brokers and distributors. We believe that our direct sales personnelpeople combined with brokers and distributors provide an effective means of reaching a broad and diverse customer base. Our products are sold to specialty and natural food distributors, as well as to supermarkets, natural food stores, mass-market and other retail classes of trade including mass-markete-commerce retailers, e-tailers, food service channels and club, drug and convenience stores. We manufacture domestically and internationally and our products are sold in more than 5070 countries.

We have acquired numerous brands since our formation and we intendour goal is to seek future growth through internal expansioncontinue to grow both organically as well as through the acquisition of complementary brands. We consider the acquisition of naturalorganic and organicnatural food and personal care products companies or product lines an integrala part of our business strategy. We also seek to broaden the distribution of our key brands across all sales channels and geographies. We believe that by integrating our various brands, we will continue to achieve economies of scale and enhanced market penetration. We perform ongoing reviews of our products and categories and have and may continue to eliminate certain products and/or brands that do not meet our standards for profitability or are not in line with our overall strategy. We seek to capitalize on the equity of our brands and the distribution achieved through each of our acquired businesses with strategic and timely introductions of new products that complement and provide innovation to existing lines to enhance revenues and margins. We believe our continuing investments in the operational performance of our business units and our focused execution on cost containment, productivity, cash flow and margin enhancement positions us to offer innovative new products with healthful attributes and enables us to build on the foundation of our long-term strategy of sustainable growth. We are committed to creating and promoting A HealthyHealthier Way of LifeTM for the benefit of consumers, our customers, shareholders and employees.
We expect the
The global economic and political environment to remainremains challenging. With the recent acquisitions we have made, a larger proportionlarge portion of our sales take place outside of the United States. A deterioration in economic or political conditions either in the United States or Europeareas in which we operate may have an adverse impact on our sales volumes and profitability. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to manage continued global economic or political uncertainty, particularly in our significant geographic markets. Additionally, the translation of the financial statements of our non-United States operations is impacted by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Due to the recent strengthening of the United States Dollar, our reported results, financial position and cash flows for our international operations has been adversely affected upon translating such results to our United States Dollar reporting currency. Generally, commodity prices continue to be volatile, and we have experienced increases in select input costs. We expect that higher input costs will continue to affect future periods. Our management team continues to work on our worldwide sourcing and procurement initiatives to meet the needs of our growing business, and we continue to look for opportunities to supply our growth. We have taken, and will continue to take, measures to mitigate the impact of these challenging conditions, including foreign currency risks and input cost increases, with improvements in operating efficiencies, cost savings initiatives and price increases to our customers, as well as continuing our cash flow hedging program.

As a consumer products company, we rely on continued demand for our brands and products. Our results are dependent on a number of factors impacting consumer confidence and spending, including but not limited to, general economic and business conditions and wage and employment levels.
Our sales and profits have continued to increase during a difficult period. We expect that we will continue to support the increased consumer consumption we have experienced in In the United States, over the last two years with expanded distribution, efficientour use of promotional allowances and theprograms, expanded distribution and introduction of innovative new products has helped to increase consumer consumption of our brands in recent years. In the United Kingdom, our prior year acquisition of Tilda expands our worldwide product portfolio into the premium Basmati rice category along with other specialty rice products. We have experienced increasesplan to grow the Tilda brand further using our existing distribution platform in select input costs,the United States, Canada and we expect that higher input costs will continue to affect future periods. We strive to mitigateEurope with Basmati and ready-to-heat rice product offerings. Additionally, Tilda’s

28



existing markets in the impactMiddle East, Northern Africa and India provide us with the opportunity for expansion of these challenging conditions and input cost increases with improvements in operating efficiencies, cost savings initiatives and price increases to our customers.global brands into new markets.

Recent Developments

On April 27, 2012,July 24, 2015, we acquired Cully & Sully Limited,Formatio Beratungs- und Beteiligungs GmbH and its subsidiaries (“Mona”), a marketerleader in plant-based foods and manufacturerbeverages with facilities in Germany and Austria. Mona offers a wide range of brandedorganic and natural chilled soups, savory pies products under the Joya® and hot potsHappy® brands, including soy, oat, rice and nut based drinks as well as plant-based yogurts, desserts, creamers, tofu and private label products, sold to leading retailers in IrelandEurope, primarily in Austria and Germany and eastern European countries. Consideration in the transaction consisted of cash totaling €22.4 million (approximately $24.6 million at the transaction date exchange rate) and 240,207 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $16.3 million. Also included in the acquisition was the assumption of net debt totaling €15,951. The cash portion of the purchase price was funded with borrowings under our Credit Agreement. The results of Mona will be included in our Europe operating segment for fiscal 2016 beginning as of the date of acquisition.

On March 4, 2015, we acquired the remaining 81% of EK Holdings, Inc. (“Empire”) that we did not already own, at which point Empire became a wholly-owned subsidiary. Empire grows, processes and sells kosher poultry and other products. Consideration in that transaction consisted of cash totaling $57.6 million (net of cash acquired) which included debt that was repaid at closing. The acquisition of Empire was funded with borrowings under the Credit Agreement. Empire is included in the Hain Pure Protein segment.

On February 20, 2015, we acquired Belvedere International, Inc., (“Belvedere”) a leader in health and beauty care products including the Live Clean€10.5 million® brand with approximately 200 baby, body and hair care products as well as several mass market brands sold primarily in Canada and manufactured in a company facility in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. Consideration in the transaction consisted of cash net (approximately $13.8totaling C$17.5 million ($14.0 million at the transaction date exchange rate), which included debt that was repaid at closing, and was funded with existing cash balances. Additionally, contingent consideration of up to €4.5a maximum of C$4.0 million is payable based uponon the achievement of specified operating results during the period through June 30,two consecutive one-year periods following the closing date. Belvedere is included in our Canada operating segment.

On December 29, 2014, we effected a two-for-one stock split of our common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend to shareholders of record as of December 12, 2014. We believeAll share and per share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the acquisitionstock split and we recorded the incremental par value of Cully & Sully complements our existing product offerings and provides usthe newly issued shares with the opportunityoffset to expand our presenceadditional paid-in capital.

On December 12, 2014, we entered into the Irish marketplace.Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) which provides for a $1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility which may be increased by an additional uncommitted $350 million, provided certain conditions are met. The Credit Agreement expires in December 2019. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement may be used to provide working capital, finance capital expenditures and permitted acquisitions, refinance certain existing indebtedness and for other lawful corporate purposes.

On October 25, 2011,2014, there was a fire at our Tilda milling facility that required us to temporarily use co-packers, which has affected the timing and amount of product available to be sold. We are insured for the costs incurred as a result of the fire and a portion of the milling facility is currently functional, with the remaining milling lines expected to be functional by the end of the 2015 calendar year.

On August 19, 2014, we announced a voluntary recall on certain nut butters. In connection with the voluntary recall, we recorded pre-tax costs totaling $34.3 million in fiscal 2015 and previously recorded charges of $6.0 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. For fiscal 2015 the charges recorded primarily relate to returns of product from customers ($15.8 million) and inventory on-hand and other cost of goods sold charges ($13.6 million), and to a lesser extent consumer refunds and other administrative costs ($4.9 million). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration now considers this recall concluded and the Company does not anticipate any further material charges to be incurred.

On July 17, 2014, we acquired the Daniels Groupremaining 51.3% of Hain Pure Protein Corporation (“Daniels”HPPC”), that we did not already own, at which point HPPC became a leading marketerwholly-owned subsidiary. HPPC processes, markets and manufacturer of natural chilled foodsdistributes antibiotic-free, organic and other poultry products. Included in the United Kingdom, for £146.5 millionacquisition was HPPC’s 19% interest in cash, net (approximately $233.8 million atEmpire. Consideration in the transaction date exchange rate),consisted of cash totaling $20.3 million and up to £13 million (approximately $20.5 million at the transaction date exchange rate) of contingent consideration based upon the achievement of specified operating results during the twelve month periods ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013. Daniels’ product offerings include three leading brands, The New Covent Garden Soup Co.®, Johnson’s Juice Co.® and Farmhouse Fare®. Daniels also offers fresh prepared fruit products. Daniels’ products are sold at all major supermarkets and select foodservice outlets throughout the United Kingdom. We believe the acquisition of Daniels will extend our presence into one of the fastest-growing healthy food segments in the United Kingdom and provides a platform for the growth462,856 shares of our combined operation. We also believecommon stock valued at $19.7 million. The cash consideration paid was funded with existing cash balances. Additionally, HPPC’s existing bank borrowings were repaid on September 30, 2014 with proceeds from borrowings under the acquisition provides us with the scale in our international operations to allow us to introduce some of our existing global brands in the marketplace in a more meaningful way.Credit Agreement.



2329


On October 5, 2011 we acquired the assets and business of the Europe’s Best brand of all natural frozen fruit and vegetable products through our wholly-owned Hain Celestial Canada subsidiary for $9.5 million in cash. The Europe’s Best product line includes premium fruit and vegetable products distributed in Canada. The acquisition provides us entry into a new category and is expected to complement our existing product offerings.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company made the decision to sell its private-label chilled ready meals ("CRM") business in the United Kingdom, which was acquired in October 2011 as part of the acquisition of Daniels. The sale of the CRM business was completed on August 20, 2012. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company made the decision to dispose of its sandwich operations, including the Daily BreadTM brand name in the United Kingdom. The disposal of the sandwich business is expected to be completed during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Operating results for the CRM business, which have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the October 2011 acquisition, and the sandwich business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

On August 22, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire Premier Foods plc's portfolio of market-leading packaged grocery brands including Hartley's®, Sun-Pat®, Gale's®, Robertson's®, and Frank Cooper's®, together with its manufacturing base in Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom. The product offerings acquired include peanut butter, honey, jams, fruit and jelly, marmalade and chocolate products. The acquisition, which is subject to approval by Premier Foods shareholders and consent from its banking syndicate, is expected to close by the end of October 2012. Consideration in the transaction will consist of £170 million in cash and £30 million in shares of the Company's common stock (calculated using the closing price of the Company's stock on the date of signing the agreement).

Results of Operations

FISCAL 2012 COMPARED TO FISCAL 2011Comparison of Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2015 to Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2014        

The following table compares our results of operations, including as a percentage of net sales, on a consolidated basis, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in thousands, other than percentages which may not add due to rounding):

 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2015 2014
Net sales$2,688,515
 100.0% $2,153,611
 100.0%
Cost of sales2,069,898
 77.0% 1,586,418
 73.7%
Gross profit618,617
 23.0% 567,193
 26.3%
       
Selling, general and administrative expenses348,517
 13.0% 311,288
 14.5%
Amortization/impairment of acquired intangibles23,495
 0.9% 15,600
 0.7%
Acquisition related expenses, restructuring and integration charges, net8,860
 0.3% 12,568
 0.6%
Operating income237,745
 8.8% 227,737
 10.6%
Interest and other expenses, net22,455
 0.8% 20,143
 0.9%
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investees215,290
 8.0% 207,594
 9.6%
Provision for income taxes47,883
 1.8% 70,099
 3.3%
Equity in net (income) of equity-method investees(489) —% (3,985) (0.2)%
Income from continuing operations167,896
 6.2% 141,480
 6.6%
Discontinued operations
 —% (1,629) (0.1)%
Net income$167,896
 6.2% $139,851
 6.5%


Net Sales

Net sales in fiscal 20122015 were $1.38$2.69 billion,, an increase of $269.7$534.9 million,, or 24.3%24.8%, from net sales of $1.11$2.15 billion in fiscal 2011.2014.

The sales increase primarily resulted from an increasethe acquisitions of Empire in March 2015, Belvedere in February 2015, and HPPC in July 2014, which collectively accounted for approximately $369.0 million of net sales in fiscal 2015 and includes the acquired business’ growth under our ownership. Additionally, the acquisition of Tilda and Rudi’s, completed in January 2014 and April 2014, respectively, resulted in additional net sales of $81.5approximately $144.9 million during fiscal 2015, as Tilda and Rudi’s were only included in our consolidated results for less than six months and two months, respectively, in the United States from improvedprior year. Additionally, our sales increased due to the volume of our products sold as a result of increased consumption and expanded distribution as well as an increasedistribution. Foreign exchange rates unfavorably impacted net sales during fiscal 2015 by approximately $55.2 million. In addition, sales were negatively impacted by $15.8 million of $153.1 millionsales returns in the United Kingdom primarily duefiscal 2015 related to the acquisitionour voluntary recall of Daniels in the second quarter of the current fiscal year.certain nut butters. Refer to the Segment Results section for additional discussion.

Gross Profit

Gross profit in fiscal 20122015 was $382.5$618.6 million,, an increase of $62.6$51.4 million,, or 19.6%9.1%, from last year’s gross profit of $319.8 million. Gross profit in fiscal 2012 was 27.8% of net sales compared to 28.9% of net sales for fiscal 2011.$567.2 million. The changeincrease in gross profit percentage resulted from sales from the mix of product sales, including the margin impact relatedaforementioned acquisitions and growth attributable to the inclusionincreases in the volume of Danielsour products sold, which operates at slightly lower relative margins. In addition, we experienced generally higher input costs,was offset partially by productivity$29.3 million in pre-tax charges related to our voluntary recall of certain nut butters. Such charges in the current fiscal year included the aforementioned $15.8 million sales returns and price increases.$13.6 million of inventory write-offs and other cost of goods sold charges, which collectively negatively impacted gross margin by approximately 100 basis points. Additionally, we incurred incremental costs totaling $10.7 million associated with start and ramp-up of certain lines in our chilled desserts factory in the United Kingdom, whereas the incremental costs in the prior year totaled $2.1 million. Gross margin was unfavorably impacted by our recent acquisitions, principally the HPPC segment, and the items discussed above. Tilda operates at higher margins than the other businesses in the United Kingdom segment and the Hain Pure Protein segment operates at lower margins than the Company’s other segments.

30




Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $237.6$348.5 million,, an increase of $29.0$37.2 million,, or 13.9%12.0%, in fiscal 20122015 from $208.6$311.3 million in fiscal 2011.2014. Selling, general and administrative expenses have increased primarily as a result of the costs brought on by the businesses we acquired, including higher amortization expenseacquired. In addition, during the current fiscal year, we recorded $4.9 million of charges for consumer refunds and other administrative costs associated with the voluntary nut butter recall and $5.7 million of charges related to identified intangible assets, partially offset by savings resulting from the integration of the Sensible Portions brand operations.a legal settlement. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales was 17.2%13.0% in fiscal 20122015 and 18.8%14.5% in fiscal 2011,2014, a decrease of 160150 basis points primarily attributable to achieving additional operating leverage on our infrastructure as a result of higher sales volume and the impact of the Hain Pure Protein segment which has a lower selling, general and administrative expense base than the other businesses. In addition, in the current year we modified certain employee compensation by shifting a portion of such compensation from cash to stock-based compensation in order to enhance employee retention and further align employees with shareholder interests. We expect this practice of employee compensation to continue in the future.

Amortization/Impairment of Acquired Intangibles

Amortization/impairment of acquired intangibles was $23.5 million, an increase of $7.9 million, or 50.6%, in fiscal 2015 from $15.6 million in fiscal 2014. The increase was primarily due to intangibles acquired as a result of the Company’s recent acquisitions as well as a non-cash partial impairment charge of $5.5 million related to the inclusionone of Daniels which operates with lower relative expenses.our United Kingdom indefinite-lived intangible assets (our New Covent Garden Soup Co.® trademark).

Acquisition Related Expenses, Restructuring and RestructuringIntegration Charges, net

We incurred acquisition, restructuring and integration related expenses aggregating $8.0$8.9 million in fiscal 2015, which relate to professional fees, severance and other transaction related costs associated with the three acquisitions completed in the current fiscal year, as well as a portion of the total costs incurred to complete the acquisition of Mona, which occurred in July 2015. Additionally, we wrote-off $1.0 million of leasehold improvements (a non-cash charge) due to the relocation of our New York based BluePrint manufacturing facility. Finally, we incurred $1.7 million of severance charges associated with that relocation as well as for the outsourcing of our natural channel merchandising function.

We incurred acquisition, restructuring and integration related expenses aggregating $12.6 million in fiscal 2014, of which $7.9 million relate to professional fees and stamp duty associated with our recently completed acquisitions. Additionally, we recorded $8.3 million of integration and restructuring costs related to the ongoing integration of certain activities in the United Kingdom and a sales reorganization in the United States. These expenses were offset by a net reduction in expense of $3.6 million related to adjustments to the carrying amount of acquisition related contingent consideration liabilities.

Operating Income

Operating income in fiscal 2015 was $237.7 million, an increase of $10.0 million, or 4.4%, from $227.7 million in fiscal 2014. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 8.8% in fiscal 2015 compared with 10.6% in fiscal 2014. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was negatively impacted by approximately 120 basis points due to the voluntary nut butter recall, and to a lesser extent, the other items described above.

Interest and Other Expenses, net

Interest and other expenses, net (which includes foreign currency gains and losses) were $22.5 million for fiscal 2015 compared to $20.1 million for fiscal 2014, respectively. Net interest expense totaled $24.8 million in fiscal 2015, which includes interest on the $150 million of 5.98% senior notes outstanding, interest related to borrowings under our Credit Agreement, amortization of deferred financing costs and certain other interest charges, offset partially by interest income earned on cash equivalents. Net interest expense in fiscal 2014 was $23.4 million. The increase in net interest expense primarily resulted from higher average borrowings under our Credit Agreement, the proceeds of which were used to fund the current year acquisition of Empire and the prior year acquisitions of Tilda and Rudi’s. This was partially offset by a lower average interest rate starting in December 2014 when we amended our Credit Agreement. Net other expenses was a reduction of expense of $2.4 million for fiscal 2015 as compared to a reduction of expense of $3.3 million in fiscal 2014. Included in the current fiscal year net other expenses is a gain of $8.3 million on the Company’s pre-existing ownership interests in HPPC and Empire, which was offset by foreign currency gains and losses primarily for net unrealized foreign currency losses associated with the remeasurement of foreign currency denominated intercompany balances. In the prior period, the net reduction in expense was primarily related to the remeasurement of foreign currency denominated intercompany balances.


31



Income Before Income Taxes and Equity in Earnings of Equity-Method Investees

Income before income taxes and equity in the after tax earnings of our equity-method investees for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $215.3 million and $207.6 million, respectively. The change was due to the items discussed above.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes includes federal, foreign, state and local income taxes. Our income tax expense was $47.9 million in fiscal 2015 compared to $70.1 million in fiscal 2014.

Our effective income tax rate from continuing operations was 22.2% of pre-tax income in fiscal 2015 compared to 33.8% in fiscal 2014. The effective tax rate in fiscal 2015 was favorably impacted by a tax restructuring we completed at the end of fiscal 2015, whereby we changed the United States tax status of our Canadian subsidiary which resulted in a tax benefit of $20.7 million. Such benefit related to the recognition of previously unrealized and unrecognized tax benefits as a result of such tax status election. As part of this change in tax status, we have determined that our future earnings of our Canadian subsidiary will be indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States. Additionally, non-taxable gains were recorded on the pre-existing ownership interests in HPPC and Empire of $8.3 million. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2014 was impacted by a reduction in the statutory tax rate in the United Kingdom enacted in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. Such reduction resulted in a decrease of the carrying value of net deferred tax liabilities of $3.8 million which favorably impacted the effective tax rate. This amount in the prior year period was offset by an increase in the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits of $0.6 million relating to an additional liability associated with an IRS audit that has since been completed, as well as valuation allowances recorded in the prior year totaling $2.2 million relating to losses incurred in Germany resulting from increased costs from the start-up of our new plant-based beverage factory.

Our effective tax rate may change from period to period based on recurring and non-recurring factors including the geographical mix of earnings, enacted tax legislation, state and local income taxes and tax audit settlements.

Equity in Earnings of Equity-Method Investees

Our equity in the net income from our joint venture investments for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 was $0.5 million compared to $4.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. HPPC earnings are reflected in operating income for fiscal 2015 rather than as equity earnings for fiscal 2014, which accounts for the decrease in equity earnings (see Notes 1 and 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Income From Continuing Operations

Income from continuing operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $167.9 million and $141.5 million, or $1.62 and $1.42 per diluted share, respectively. The change was attributable to the factors noted above.

Discontinued Operations

Our loss from discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 was $1.6 million, which relates to a $2.8 million loss on the sale of the Grains Noirs business in Europe in February 2014, offset partially by a gain of $1.1 million related to the finalization of a working capital adjustment on the sale of the private-label chilled ready meals business in the United Kingdom, which was completed in fiscal 2013.




32



Segment Results

The following table provides a summary of net sales and operating income by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
(dollars in thousands) United States United Kingdom Hain Pure Protein Rest of World 
Corporate and other (1)
 Consolidated
Fiscal 2015 net sales $1,367,388
 $735,996
 $358,582
 $226,549
 $
 $2,688,515
Fiscal 2014 net sales $1,282,175
 $637,454
 $
 $233,982
 $
 $2,153,611
% change 6.6 % 15.5 %   (3.2)%   24.8%
             
Fiscal 2015 operating income $199,901
 $46,222
 $26,479
 $16,438
 $(51,295) $237,745
Fiscal 2014 operating income $205,864
 $52,661
 $
 $16,931
 $(47,719) $227,737
% change (2.9)% (12.2)%   (2.9)%   4.4%
             
Fiscal 2015 operating income margin 14.6 % 6.3 % 7.4% 7.3 %   8.8%
Fiscal 2014 operating income margin 16.1 % 8.3 %   7.2 %   10.6%

(1)Corporate and other includes $8,471 and $10,076 of acquisition related expenses, restructuring and integration charges for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Corporate and other also includes expense of $280 and a net reduction of expense of $3,616 for contingent consideration adjustments for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. A non-cash impairment charge of $5,510 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 related to an indefinite-lived intangible asset in the the United Kingdom segment is also included in Corporate and other.

Our operations are managed in five operating segments: United States, United Kingdom, Hain Pure Protein, Canada and Europe. The United States, the United Kingdom and Hain Pure Protein are currently reportable segments, while Canada and Europe do not currently meet the quantitative thresholds for reporting and are therefore combined and reported as “Rest of World.” 

The Corporate category consists of expenses related to the Company’s centralized administrative function which do not specifically relate to an operating segment. Such Corporate expenses are comprised mainly of the compensation and related expenses of certain of the Company’s senior executive officers and other employees who perform duties related to our entire enterprise, as well as expenses for certain professional fees, facilities, and other items which benefit the Company as a whole. Additionally, acquisition related expenses, restructuring, impairment and integration charges are included in Corporate and other. Refer to Note 16, Segment Information, for additional details.

Our net sales in the United States in fiscal 2015 were $1.37 billion, an increase of $85.2 million, or 6.6%, from net sales of $1.28 billion in fiscal 2014. Net sales were negatively impacted by $15.8 million of sales returns in fiscal 2015 related to our voluntary recall of certain nut butters and further impacted by the associated interruption in production and shipping of products which resulted in lower net sales in the current fiscal year of $30 million as compared to the prior year. The sales increase was principally due to the impact of our prior year fourth quarter acquisition of Rudi’s, which accounted for $54.3 million of the increase in net sales from the prior year, such increase also including the growth of this brand under our ownership. Additionally, our sales increased due to the volume of our products sold as a result of increased consumption and expanded distribution. We experienced volume growth in many of our brands, including Alba Botanica, Avalon Organics, Earth’s Best, Garden of Eatin’, The Greek Gods, JASON, Sensible Portions and Terra. Selling prices charged to customers increased from the prior year for certain products where input costs increased, however such price increases did not have a material impact on our total net sales increase in the United States. Operating income in the United States in fiscal 2015 was $199.9 million, a decrease of $6.0 million from operating income of $205.9 million in fiscal 2014. Operating income was negatively impacted by charges totaling $34.3 million for the voluntary nut butter recall including additional factory expenses associated with bringing our nut butter production facility back to full operations, as well as $2.8 million of expenses associated with the restructuring and relocation of our New York based BluePrint manufacturing facility and the outsourcing of our natural channel merchandising function. These charges negatively impacted operating income percentage by approximately 250 basis points.

33




Our net sales in the United Kingdom in fiscal 2015 were $736.0 million, an increase of $98.5 million, or 15.5%, from net sales of $637.5 million in fiscal 2014. The sales increase was primarily a result of the acquisition of Tilda in January 2014, which accounts for approximately $90.5 million of the increase. Foreign currency exchange rates resulted in decreased net sales of $27.2 million as compared to the prior year period. Operating income in the United Kingdom in fiscal 2015 was $46.2 million, a decrease of $6.4 million, from $52.7 million in fiscal 2014. The change in operating income was due to incremental costs totaling $10.7 million associated with start and ramp-up activities in our chilled desserts factory in the United Kingdom, whereas the incremental costs in the prior fiscal year totaled $3.1 million, which amount in the prior year period also included start-up costs of new lines at the Company’s soup manufacturing facility and additional costs at Tilda related to service fees from the India sourcing business prior to June 18, 2014, the date we acquired those sourcing assets and business. Additionally, during fiscal 2015, there was a fire at our Tilda milling facility that required us to temporarily use co-packers, which has affected the timing and amount of product available to be sold. We are insured for the costs incurred as a result of the fire and a portion of the milling facility is currently functional, with the remaining milling lines expected to be functional by the end of the 2015 calendar year.

Our net sales in the Hain Pure Protein segment were $358.6 million in fiscal 2015. The remaining 51.3% of HPPC that was not previously owned was acquired on July 17, 2014, and the remaining 81% of Empire that was not previously owned was acquired on March 4, 2015. Hain Pure Protein’s operating income for fiscal 2015 was $26.5 million.

Our net sales in the Rest of World were $226.5 million in fiscal 2015, a decrease of $7.4 million, or 3.2%, from fiscal 2014. The change was primarily the result of unfavorable Canadian Dollar and Euro exchange rates that resulted in decreased net sales upon translation of $24.9 million compared to the prior fiscal year. In Canada, we completed the acquisition of Belvedere in February which only resulted in a nominal amount of net sales in fiscal 2015 due to the timing of the acquisition. Canada was also negatively impacted by the disruption of business due to the voluntary nut butter recall. In Europe, net sales also changed due to a shift in the responsibilities for certain plant-based beverage business from the management of the Europe segment to the United Kingdom segment, which lowered Europe’s net sales by approximately $8.7 million. Additionally, during fiscal 2014, we disposed of the Grains Noirs business and a private label plant-based beverage business was discontinued. Operating income in local currency, excluding the impact of the plant-based beverage withdrawal, increased as demand for our products in both Canada and Europe remains strong and we continue to leverage our existing expense base.


34




Comparison of Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2014 to Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2013    

The following table compares our results of operations, including as a percentage of net sales, on a consolidated basis, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (amounts in thousands, other than percentages which may not add due to rounding):

 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2014 2013
Net sales$2,153,611
 100.0% $1,734,683
 100.0%
Cost of sales1,586,418
 73.7% 1,259,823
 72.6%
Gross profit567,193
 26.3% 474,860
 27.4%
       
Selling, general and administrative expenses311,288
 14.5% 274,750
 15.8%
Amortization/impairment of acquired intangibles15,600
 0.7% 12,192
 0.7%
Acquisition related expenses, restructuring and
   integration charges, net
12,568
 0.6% 13,606
 0.8%
Operating income227,737
 10.6% 174,312
 10.0%
Interest and other expenses, net20,143
 0.9% 20,490
 1.2%
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investees207,594
 9.6% 153,822
 8.9%
Provision for income taxes70,099
 3.3% 34,324
 2.0%
Equity in net (income) of equity-method investees(3,985) (0.2)% (295) —%
Income from continuing operations141,480
 6.6% 119,793
 6.9%
Discontinued operations(1,629) (0.1)% (5,137) (0.3)%
Net income$139,851
 6.5% $114,656
 6.6%

Net Sales

Net sales in fiscal 2014 were $2.15 billion, an increase of $418.9 million, or 24.2%, from net sales of $1.73 billion in fiscal 2013.

The sales increase primarily resulted from an increase in sales of $186.3 million in the United States and an increase of $217.0 million in the United Kingdom. Foreign currency exchange rates resulted in increased net sales of $18.3 million as compared to the prior year. Refer to the Segment Results section for additional discussion.

Gross Profit

Gross profit in fiscal 2014 was $567.2 million, an increase of $92.3 million, or 19.4%, from last year’s gross profit of $474.9 million. Gross margin in fiscal 2014 was 26.3% of net sales compared to 27.4% of net sales for fiscal 2013. The change in gross margin resulted from a strategic shift in promotional spending from activities classified as selling expenses to activities classified as reductions in sales in the United States, which impacted gross margin by approximately 50 basis points. Additionally, gross profit was impacted by a charge recorded during fiscal 2014 of $6.0 million related to our August 2014 voluntary recall of certain nut butters which negatively impacted gross margin by approximately 30 basis points. Finally, we incurred costs associated with start-up activities in certain of our factories in Europe and the United Kingdom. This was partially offset by the current year acquisition of Tilda, which operates at slightly higher margins than the other businesses in the United Kingdom. In addition, we experienced generally higher input costs, offset partially by productivity initiatives and price increases.


35



Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $311.3 million, an increase of $36.5 million, or 13.3%, in fiscal 2014 from $274.8 million in fiscal 2013. Selling, general and administrative expenses have increased primarily as a result of the costs brought on by the businesses we acquired. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales was 14.5% in fiscal 2014 and 15.8% in fiscal 2013, a decrease of 130 basis points primarily attributable to achieving additional operating leverage on our SG&A infrastructure as a result of higher sales volume. Additionally, as discussed above, we experienced a shift in promotional activities in the United States which resulted in a reduction of certain selling expenses.

Amortization of acquired intangibles

Amortization of acquired intangibles was $15.6 million, an increase of $3.4 million, or 28.0%, in fiscal 2014 from $12.2 million in fiscal 2013. The increase is due to intangibles acquired as a result of the Company’s current year acquisitions of Tilda and Rudi’s, as well as the full year impact of prior year acquisitions, principally Ella’s Kitchen which was acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.

Acquisition Related Expenses, Restructuring and Integration Charges

We incurred acquisition, restructuring and integration related expenses aggregating $12.6 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012,2014, of which $7.9 million relate to professional fees and stamp duty associated with our current year acquisitions. Additionally, we recorded $8.3 million of integration and restructuring costs related to the ongoing integration of certain activities in the United Kingdom and a sales reorganization in the United States. Finally, a net reduction of expense of $3.6 million was recorded related to adjustments to the carrying amount of acquisition related contingent consideration liabilities.

We incurred acquisition, restructuring and integration related expenses aggregating $13.6 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, which were primarily related to the acquisition of Daniels. Thethe UK Ambient Grocery Brands, Ella’s Kitchen and BluePrint, and to a lesser extent restructuring and integration charges were offset by a net reduction of expense of $14.6 million primarily representing the reversal of the carrying value of contingent consideration for the Daniels acquisition based on our revised estimate of fair value, offset partially by additional expense related to the settlement of the contingent consideration for the World Gourmet acquisition.
We incurred acquisition and integration related expenses aggregating $3.5 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 related

24


to the acquisitions of The Greek Gods greek-style yogurt brand, Danival and GG UniqueFiber and other acquisition andongoing integration activities which was offset by $4.2 million of net expense reduction related to adjustments in the carrying values of contingent consideration. We also incurred approximately $0.7 million of restructuring expenses, primarily related to the closing of a small non-dairy production facilitycertain functions in the United Kingdom.Kingdom into the Daniels operations. Additionally, we recorded contingent consideration expense of $2.3 million in fiscal 2013 based on then current estimates of the liability.

Operating Income

Operating income in fiscal 20122014 was $151.5$227.7 million,, an increase of $40.4$53.4 million,, or 36.3%30.6%, from $111.2$174.3 million in fiscal 2011.2013. The increase in operating income resulted primarily from the increased sales and gross profit. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 11.0%10.6% in fiscal 20122014 compared with 10.0% in fiscal 2011.2013. The change in operating income percentage is attributable to the decrease in acquisition related expenses (primarily due to the adjustment in the carrying value of contingent consideration) recorded during fiscal 2012, asitems described above.

Interest and Other Expenses, net

Interest and other expenses, net (which includes foreign currency gains and losses) were $17.3$20.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2012fiscal 2014 compared to $12.2$20.5 million for fiscal 2011.2013. Net interest expense totaled $15.8$23.4 million in fiscal 2012,2014, which includes interest on the $150 million of 5.98% senior notes outstanding, interest related to borrowings under our revolving credit agreement, amortization of deferred financing costs and certain other interest charges, offset partially by interest income earned on cash equivalents. Net interest expense in fiscal 20112013 was $14.1 million.$19.4 million. The increase in interest expense primarily resulted from higher average borrowings under our revolving credit facility, the proceeds of which were used to purchase Daniels duringfund the period, offset partially bycurrent year acquisitions. Net other expenses was a lower interest accretion on contingent considerationreduction in expense of $3.3 million for fiscal 2014 as compared to expense of $1.1 million for fiscal 2013. The net gain recorded in the current year is primarily due to payments that were made duringunrealized foreign currency gains associated with the first and second quartersremeasurement of fiscal 2012.foreign currency denominated intercompany balances.

Income Before Income Taxes and Equity in Earnings of Equity-Method Investees

Income before income taxes and equity in the after tax earnings of our equity-method investees for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20122014 and 20112013 was $134.2$207.6 million and $98.9$153.8 million,, respectively. The increase was due to the items discussed above.


36



Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes includes federal, foreign, state and local income taxes. Our income tax expense was $41.2$70.1 million in fiscal 20122014 compared to $37.8$34.3 million in fiscal 2011.2013. Our effective income tax rate from continuing operations was 30.7%33.8% of pre-tax income in fiscal 20122014 compared to 38.2%22.3% in fiscal 2011.2013. The effective tax rate in fiscal 20122014 was lowerhigher than the prior year primarily as a result of reducedan income tax benefit of $13.2 million recorded in the prior year related to a United States worthless stock tax deduction for our investment in one of our United Kingdom subsidiaries. Additionally, we recorded valuation allowances totaling $2.2 million in the current year, primarily relating to losses incurred in Germany resulting from increased costs from the start-up of our new plant-based beverage factory, as compared to a benefit of $1.7 million that we recorded in the prior year from the reversal of valuation allowances in the United Kingdom andbased on the acquisitionexpected realization of Daniels on October 25, 2011 and the increased income in its lower tax rate jurisdiction. The Company's tax rate in fiscal 2012 was also favorably impacted by the reduction of the carrying value of our liability for contingent consideration that was recorded in the fourth quarter, which did not have a corresponding tax impact, which was partially offset by an unfavorable impact of $1.2 million related to nondeductible transaction costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of Daniels. Prior to the acquisition of Daniels, no tax benefits were recognized for losses incurred in the United Kingdom. The Company will continue to maintain a valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets related to those carryforward losses until an appropriate level of profitability is attained such that the losses may be utilized. If the Company is able to realize any of these deferred tax assets in the future, the provision for income taxes will be reduced by a release of the corresponding valuation allowance. In addition, in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, the Company recorded adjustments to recognize decreases of $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, in its liability for uncertain tax positions as the result of expirations of statute of limitations.loss carryforwards.

The effective rate for each period differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the items noted previously, as well as the effect of the mix of taxable income by jurisdiction and state and local income taxes. Our effective tax rate may change from quarterperiod to quarterperiod based on recurring and non-recurring factors including the geographical mix of earnings, enacted tax legislation, state and local income taxes and tax audit settlements.

Equity in Earnings of Equity-Method Investees

Our equity in the net income from our joint venture investments for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20122014 was $1.1$4.0 million compared to a loss of $2.1$0.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.2013. The increase in our share of income from our equity-method investees as compared to the prior year is due to increased income recorded by both our HPP and HHO joint ventures. Our equity in the earnings of HPP were $3.0 million in fiscal 2014 and $2.2 million in fiscal 2013. Our share of HHO’s earnings increased to $2.4$1.0 million during fiscal 2012 from as compared to a loss of $2.2$1.9 million during in the prior year. The increase in our share of HHO’s earnings was primarily due to a gain recorded in the current year on their previously discontinued infant formula business resulting from a judgment rendered in favor of HHO with a supplier. Additionally, HHO’s continuing operations are currently recording positive income.

On July 17, 2014, we acquired the remaining 51.3% of HPP that we did not already own, at which point HPP became our wholly-owned subsidiary. As such, in fiscal 2011, which was partially offset by losses incurred by HHO2015, HPP will no longer be accounted for as they continue to developan equity method investee, but rather its operations will be included in the Asian markets for our products.consolidated financial statements.

Income From Continuing Operations

Income from continuing operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20122014 and 20112013 was $94.2$141.5 million and $59.0$119.8 million,, or

25


$2.05 $2.83 and $1.32$2.52 per diluted share, respectively. The increase was attributable to the factors noted above.

Discontinued Operations

Our loss from discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20122014 and 2013 was $15.0$1.6 million compared and $5.1 million, respectively. The loss from discontinued operations in fiscal 2014 relates to the $2.8 million loss on the sale of the Company’s Grains Noirs business in Europe, which was completed on February 6, 2014, offset partially by a loss$1.1 million gain related to the finalization of $4.0 million fora working capital adjustment on the sale of the CRM business in fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. Net2012. The results of Grains Noirs’ operations were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. During fiscal 2013, net sales and operating loss reported within discontinued operations was $73.7$15.3 million and $21.7$1.2 million, during fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. The operating loss included within discontinued operations was $16.8 million and $4.4 million for the respective periods. The operating loss for fiscal 2012 includes non-cash impairment and other non-recurring charges totaling $14.9 million related to the write-down of certain long-lived assets based on their current estimated fair value.


37



Segment Results

The following table provides a summary of net sales and operating income/(loss)income by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20122014 and 2011:2013:

(dollars in thousands) United States United Kingdom Rest of World 
Corporate and other (1)
 Consolidated
Fiscal 2012 net sales $991,626
 $192,352
 $194,269
 $
 $1,378,247
Fiscal 2011 net sales $910,095
 $39,284
 $159,167
 $
 $1,108,546
% change - Fiscal 2012 vs. 2011 9.0% 389.6 % 22.1%   24.3%
           
Fiscal 2012 operating income(loss) $149,791
 $9,690
 $13,347
 $(21,300) $151,528
Fiscal 2011 operating income(loss) $130,155
 $(4,844) $9,787
 $(23,924) $111,174
% change - Fiscal 2012 vs. 2011 15.1% 300.0 % 36.4%   36.3%
           
Fiscal 2012 operating income (loss) margin 15.1% 5.0 % 6.9%   11.0%
Fiscal 2011 operating income (loss) margin 14.3% (12.3)% 6.1%   10.0%
(dollars in thousands) United States United Kingdom Rest of World 
Corporate and other (1)
 Consolidated
Fiscal 2014 net sales $1,282,175
 $637,454
 $233,982
 $
 $2,153,611
Fiscal 2013 net sales $1,095,867
 $420,408
 $218,408
 $
 $1,734,683
% change - Fiscal 2014 vs. 2013 17.0% 51.6% 7.1 %   24.2%
           
Fiscal 2014 operating income $205,864
 $52,661
 $16,931
 $(47,719) $227,737
Fiscal 2013 operating income $177,352
 $31,069
 $18,671
 $(52,780) $174,312
% change - Fiscal 2014 vs. 2013 16.1% 69.5% (9.3)%   30.6%
           
Fiscal 2014 operating income margin 16.1% 8.3% 7.2 %   10.6%
Fiscal 2013 operating income margin 16.2% 7.4% 8.5 %   10.0%

(1)Includes $10,076 and $16,634 of acquisition related expenses, restructuring and integration charges for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Of those amounts, $945 and $4,491 are recorded in cost of sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Corporate and other also includes a net reduction of expense of $3,616 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 and expense of $2,336 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, related to adjustments of the carrying value of contingent consideration. Additionally, $6,000 of expense is included in the United States segment for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 related to a voluntary recall of certain nut butters.

Our operations are managed in four operating segments: United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Europe. The United States and the United Kingdom are currently reportable segments, while Canada and Europe do not currently meet the quantitative thresholds for reporting and are therefore combined and reported as “Rest of World.” 

(1) Includes $7,974 and $4,434 of acquisition related expenses and restructuring charges for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Corporate and other also includes reductions of expense of $14,627 and $4,177 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to net reversals of the carrying value of contingent consideration.

The Rest of World consists of our Canada and Continental Europe operating segments. The Corporate category consists of expenses related to the Company'sCompany’s centralized administrative function which do not specifically relate to an operating segment. Such Corporate expenses are comprised mainly of the compensation and related expenses of certain of the Company'sCompany’s senior executive officers and other selected employees who perform duties related to our entire enterprise, as well as expenses for certain professional fees, facilities, and other items which benefit the Company as a whole. Additionally, acquisition related expenses, restructuring and restructuringintegration charges are included in Corporate and other. Refer to Note 17,18, Segment Information, for additional details.

Our net sales in the United States in fiscal 20122014 were $991.6 million,$1.28 billion, an increase of $81.5$186.3 million,, or 9.0%17.0%, from net sales of $910.1 million$1.10 billion in fiscal 2011.2013. The sales increase was directly relatedprincipally due to continued improvedthe impact of our prior year acquisitions of BluePrint and Ella’s Kitchen, and to a lesser extent our current year acquisition of Rudi’s. These brands accounted for approximately $153.3 million and $38.0 million of the total United States segment sales for fiscals 2014 and 2013, respectively, which included increased volume from the prior year under our ownership. Additionally, our sales increased due to increases in the volume of our products sold as a result of increased consumption and expanded distribution withdistribution. We experienced volume growth fromin many of our brands, including Earth's Best, Celestial Seasonings, Imagine, MaraNatha, Garden of Eatin', Sensible Portions, The Greek Gods, Spectrum, Garden of Eatin’, Earth’s Best, Celestial Seasonings, Alba Botanica Avalon and JASON. We also experienced a shift in promotional spending from activities classified as selling expenses to activities classified as reductions of sales. Selling prices charged to customers increased from the prior year for certain products where input costs increased, however such price increases did not have a material impact on our total net sales increase in the United States. Operating income in the United States in fiscal 20122014 was $149.8$205.9 million,, an increase of $19.6$28.5 million,, or 15.1%16.1%, from operating income of $130.2$177.4 million in fiscal 2011. Additionally, operating2013. Operating income as a percentage of net sales in the United States increased to 15.1% from 14.3%was 16.1% and 16.2% during these periods.periods, respectively. The improvementchange primarily resulted from savings from the integrationcontinued leverage of the Sensible Portions brand operations, price increasesCompany’s expense base and productivity improvements, offset partially by higher input costs.costs and amortization expense on acquired intangible assets as well as $6.0 million of expense recorded associated with the voluntary nut butter recall.

38




Our net sales in the United Kingdom in fiscal 20122014 were $192.4$637.5 million,, an increase of $153.1$217.0 million,, or 389.6%51.6%, from net sales of $39.3$420.4 million in fiscal 2011.2013. The sales increase was primarily a result of the acquisition of Daniels duringTilda on January 13, 2014, which accounts for $103.9 million of the second quarterincrease. Additionally, the increase was attributable to the full year impact of the prior year acquisition of the UK Ambient Grocery Brands. These two acquisitions accounted for approximately $359.0 million and $161.6 million of the total United Kingdom sales for fiscals 2014 and 2013, respectively, which included increased volume from the prior year under our ownership. Foreign currency exchange rates resulted in increased net sales of $21.1 million over the prior year. The results for fiscal 2012.2014 do not include a full year of sales for a soup agreement with a major retailer, which became effective in October 2013. Operating income in the United Kingdom in fiscal 20122014 was $9.7$52.7 million,, an increase of $14.5$21.6 million,, from an operating loss of $4.8$31.1 million in fiscal 2011.2013. The improvementincrease in operating income and operating income margin was alsoprimarily due to the acquisition of Daniels.Tilda, which operates at slightly higher margins than the other business lines in the United Kingdom. This increase was offset partially by start-up costs associated with new lines at the Company’s soup and desserts manufacturing facilities and additional costs at Tilda related to service fees from the India sourcing business prior to June 18, 2014, the date we acquired those sourcing assets and business. These items resulted in additional costs in the current fiscal year totaling $3.1 million.

26


Our net sales in the Rest of World were $194.3$234.0 million in fiscal 2012, and2014, an increase of $35.1$15.6 million,, or 22.1%7.1%, from fiscal 2011.2013. The increase was primarily the result of increased sales in Europe and Canada dueas demand for our products remains strong. In local currency, net sales in the Rest of World increased 8.4%. This increase was impacted by net unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates, which resulted in decreased sales of $2.8 million as compared to the acquisitionprior fiscal year, the disposal of the Europe's Best brand,Grains Noirs business and to a lesser extent, increased salescertain private label plant-based beverage business in Europe from Danival and GG UniqueFiber, both of which were acquired during the third quarter of fiscal 2011.that we discontinued. Operating income as a percentage of net sales increaseddecreased to 6.9%7.2% from 6.1%8.5%, reflecting the continued leveraging of the existing cost structure.

FISCAL 2011 COMPARED TO FISCAL 2010

Net Sales
Net sales in fiscal 2011 were $1.11 billion, an increase of $218.5 million, or 24.6%, from net sales of $890.0 million in fiscal 2010.

The sales increase resulted from an increase in sales of $187.9 million in the United States from improved consumption as well as sales from the acquisition of The Greek Gods and a full year of Sensible Portions, acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. Our international sales increased $30.7 million, including sales in Europe from Danival and GG UniqueFiber, which were both acquired in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Refer to the Segment Results section for additional details.

Gross Profit
Gross profit in fiscal 2011 was $319.8 million, an increase of $71.1 million, or 28.6%, from last year’s gross profit of $248.8 million. Gross profit in fiscal 2011 was 28.9% of net sales compared to 28.0% of net sales for fiscal 2010.

The improved gross profit percentage resulted from the mix of product sales, including the sales from The Greek Gods and Sensible Portions brands acquisitions, which have relatively higher gross profit margins, and productivity improvements and cost savings which partially offset input cost increases.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $208.6 million, an increase of $42.7 million, or 25.7%, in fiscal 2011 from $165.9 million in fiscal 2010. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales was 18.8% in fiscal 2011 and 18.6% in fiscal 2010.

Selling, general and administrative expenses have increased primarily as a result of the costs brought on by the businesses we acquired, including $3.5 million of increased amortization expense related to identified intangibles. Selling, general and administrative expenses also included $8.9 million of increased costs related to the Company’s long-term incentive plans. Selling, general and administrative expenses included approximately $1.7 million of expenses related to litigation in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.

Acquisition Related Expenses and Restructuring Charges
We incurred acquisition and integration related expenses aggregating $3.5 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 related to the acquisitions of The Greek Gods greek-style yogurt brand, Danival and GG UniqueFiber and other acquisition and integration activities, which was offset by $4.2 million of net expense reduction related to adjustments in the carrying values of contingent consideration. We also incurred approximately $0.7 million of restructuring expenses, primarily related to the closing of a small production facility in the United Kingdom.

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, we incurred approximately $2.8 million of acquisition related expenses, primarily related to the acquisition of the Sensible Portions brand.

Operating Income
Operating income in fiscal 2011 was $111.2 million, an increase of $31.1 million, or 38.8%, from $80.1 million in fiscal 2010. The increase in operating income resulted primarily from the increased sales and gross profit. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 10.0% in fiscal 2011 compared with 9.0% in fiscal 2010. The increase in operating income percentage is attributable to the items discussed above.

Interest and Other Expenses, net
Interest and other expenses, net were $12.2 million for fiscal 2011 compared to $11.8 million for fiscal 2010. Net interest expense totaled $14.1 million in fiscal 2011, which includes interest on the $150 million of 5.98% senior notes outstanding,

27


interest related to borrowings under our revolving credit agreement, amortization of deferred financing costs and certain other interest charges, offset partially by interest income earned on cash equivalents. Net interest expense in fiscal 2010 was $9.8 million. The increase in interest expense resulted from a combination of higher borrowings under our revolving credit facility used to fund our recent acquisitions and the interest accretion on contingent consideration of $1.7 million. Other expenses includes approximately $2.1 million of exchange gains for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 compared to $0.7 million of exchange losses in the prior year. Also included in other expenses for the year ended June 30, 2010 is a $1.2 million non-cash impairment charge for an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of our investment in the shares of Yeo Hiap Seng Limited, a Singapore-based natural food and beverage company listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange.

Income Before Income Taxes and Equity in Earnings of Equity-Method Investees
Income before income taxes and equity in the after tax earnings of our equity-method investees for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $98.9 million and $68.3 million, respectively. The increase in each period was due to the items discussed above.

Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $37.8 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $28.4 million in fiscal 2010. Our effective income tax rates for fiscal 2011 and 2010 were 38.2% and 41.5%, respectively. The effective tax rate in both years was affected by losses incurred related to our continuing operations in the United Kingdom for which no deferred tax benefit was being recorded. Additionally, in fiscal 2010, the Company recorded valuation allowances for deferred tax assets in the United Kingdom recorded prior to fiscal 2010. The impact of the United Kingdom continuing operations losses and deferred tax valuation allowances on the effective tax rate in fiscal 2011 was to increase it 2.1 percentage points and in fiscal 2010 was to increase it 8.4 percentage points. The fiscal 2011 effective tax rate was also favorably impacted by an increase in the benefit for the domestic production activities deduction of $1.4 million.
The effective rate for each period differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the items noted previously as well as the effect of state and local income taxes. Our effective tax rate may change from quarter to quarter based on recurring and non-recurring factors including the geographical mix of earnings, enacted tax legislation, state and local income taxes and tax audit settlements.

Equity in Earnings of Equity-Method Investees
Our share in the net earnings from our investments in HPP and HHO for fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 was a loss of $2.1 million compared to a loss of $1.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. HPP’s results for fiscal 2011 included approximately $7.9 million of net loss (of which $3.9 million is included in the Company’s portion of HPP’s earnings) related to the impairment of long lived assets previously used in HPP’s divested Kosher Valley operation. HPP’s results for fiscal 2010 included approximately $4.6 million of net loss related to its Kosher Valley brand. HPP’s profitable antibiotic-free chicken and turkey results were more than offset by the losses incurred in theproduction start-up of the Kosher Valley brand. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, HPP divested its Kosher Valley brand in a transaction with Empire Kosher Poultry, Inc. (“Empire”), wherein the Kosher Valley brand and customer relationships were exchanged for an equity interest in Empire.

Income From Continuing Operations
Income from continuing operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $59.0 million and $38.2 million, or $1.32 and $0.92 per diluted share, respectively. The increase in each period was attributable to the factors noted above.

Segment Results

The following table provides a summary of net sales and operating income/(loss) by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

28


(dollars in thousands) United States United Kingdom Rest of World 
Corporate and other (1)
 Consolidated
Fiscal 2011 net sales $910,095
 $39,284
 $159,167
 $
 $1,108,546
Fiscal 2010 net sales $722,211
 $31,304
 $136,492
 $
 $890,007
% change - Fiscal 2011 vs. 2010 26.0% 25.5 % 16.6%   24.6%
           
Fiscal 2011 operating income(loss) $130,155
 $(4,844) $9,787
 $(23,924) $111,174
Fiscal 2010 operating income(loss) $98,672
 $(6,053) $8,653
 $(21,183) $80,089
% change - Fiscal 2011 vs. 2010 31.9% 20.0 % 13.1%   38.8%
           
Fiscal 2011 operating income (loss) margin 14.3% (12.3)% 6.1%   10.0%
Fiscal 2010 operating income (loss) margin 13.7% (19.3)% 6.3%   9.0%

(1) Includes $4,434 and $3,152 of acquisition related expenses and restructuring charges for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Corporate and other also includes reductions of expense of $4,177 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 related to net reversals of the carrying value of contingent consideration.

Our net sales in the United States for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 were $910.1 million, an increase of $187.9 million from the prior year's net sales of $722.2 million. The sales increase was directly related to improved consumption and was led by our Earth's Best brand, renewed growthcosts in our Avalon, Alba Botanica, and JASON brands, as well as sales from the acquisition of The Greek Gods brand and a full year of sales of the Sensible Portions brand, acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. United States operating profit increased 31.9% to $130.2 million. United States operating margin improved to 14.3% of net sales in fiscal 2011 from 13.7% in the previous year. The improvement resulted from the profit contribution of the aforementioned acquired brands as well as an increase in gross profit, which resulted from the mix of product sales, including the sales from The Greek Gods and Sensible Portions acquisitions, which have relatively higher gross profit margins, and productivity improvements and cost savings which partially offset input cost increases.
Our net sales in the United Kingdom were $39.3 million in fiscal 2011, an increase of $8.0 million, or 25.5%, from net sales of $31.3 million in fiscal 2010. The sales increase in the United Kingdom resulted from increased sales of our Linda McCartney meat-free frozen foods and our frozen desserts. Changes in foreign exchange rates had a minimal impact on net sales. United Kingdom operating loss decreased in fiscal 2011 as a result of improvement in gross profit and reduced operating expenses.
Net sales in the Rest of World category were $159.2 million in fiscal 2011, an increase of $22.7 million from net sales of $136.5 million in fiscal 2010. Sales in Europe increased $14.9 million, or 20.3%. Sales in Europe included sales from Danival and GGUniqueFiber, each acquired in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and were unfavorably impacted by $1.3 million as a result of changes in foreign exchange rates. Sales in Canada increased $7.8 million, or 12.4%, which includes a $4.1 million favorable impact as a result of changes in foreign exchange rates. Operating income increased 13.1% to $9.8 million in fiscal 2011 as a result of the two acquisitionsplant-based beverage factory in Europe as well as unfavorable Canadian Dollar exchange rates, which impact costs of goods sold due to intercompany purchases of inventory from the increased sales in Canada.United States.



Liquidity and Capital Resources

We finance our operations and growth primarily with the cash flows we generate from our operations and from both long-term fixed-rate borrowings and borrowings available to us under our credit agreement.

Our cash balance increased $2.4$43.2 million during the year ended at June 30, 20122015 to $29.9 million.$166.9 million. Our working capital was $246.0$570.6 million at June 30, 2012,2015, an increase of $45.6$191.1 million from $200.4$379.4 million at the end of fiscal 2011.2014. The increase was due principally to the aforementioned cash increase, a $26.9$32.3 million increase in accounts receivable, a $15.7$62.0 million increase in inventories offset partially byand a $21.4$68.8 million increase decrease in short-term borrowings. The increases in accounts payable, accrued expensesreceivable and otherinventory were primarily the result of our fiscal 2015 acquisitions and to a lesser extent additional investments we have made in inventory to support the demand for our products. Short-term borrowings have decreased from the end of fiscal 2014 due to the timing of rice purchases at Tilda and the repayment of the Vendor Loan Note in the current liabilities.period associated with the prior year acquisition of Tilda.

Liquidity is affected by many factors, some of which are based on normal ongoing operations of the company'scompany’s business and some of which arise from fluctuations related to global economics and markets. The Company'sCompany’s cash balances are held in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and Europe. With the current exception of Canada, itIt is the Company'sCompany’s current intent to permanentlyindefinitely reinvest these fundsits foreign earnings outside the United States. As of June 30, 2015, approximately 57% ($94.7 million) of the total cash balance is held outside of the United States. Although a portion of the consolidated cash balances are maintained outside of the United States, and itsthe Company’s current plans do not demonstrate a need to

29


repatriate themthese balances to fund its United States operations. If these funds were to be needed for the Company'sCompany’s operations in the United States, it may be required to record and pay significant United States income taxes to repatriate these funds.

39




We maintain our cash and cash equivalents primarily in money market funds or their equivalent. As of June 30, 2012,2015, all of our investments mature in less than three months. Accordingly, we do not believe that our investments have significant exposure to interest rate risk. Cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities is summarized below.
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30
(amounts in thousands)2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Cash flows provided by (used in):          
Operating activities$121,960
 $58,658
 $71,030
$185,482
 $184,768
 $120,962
Investing activities(270,664) (55,483) (62,758)(151,300) (206,236) (406,136)
Financing activities147,423
 7,134
 (32,381)17,167
 100,821
 296,137
Exchange rate activities3,659
 (58) (33)
Net increase (decrease) in cash$2,378
 $10,251
 $(24,142)
Exchange rate changes(8,178) 3,135
 405
Net (decrease) increase in cash$43,171
 $82,488
 $11,368

Net cash provided by operating activities was $122.0$185.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012,2015, compared to $58.7$184.8 million provided in fiscal 20112014 and $71.0$121.0 million provided in fiscal 2010. The increase in cash2013. Cash provided by operations in fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011 resulted from a $37.5 million increase due to changes in our working capital and a $25.8 million increase in net income and other non-cash items. The improvement in cash used for changes in operating assets and liabilities (which is exclusive of the opening balances of acquired companies), primarily resulted from favorable changes in accounts receivable and accounts payable, including timing of income tax payments. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2011 resulted from a $45.1 million decrease due to changes in our working capital, partially offset2015 was positively impacted by a $32.7$25.0 million increase in net income and other non-cash charges.items as compared to fiscal 2014. This was offset by $24.2 million of changes in our working capital accounts primarily due to higher receivables due to increased sales and timing of collections as well as charges due to the voluntary nut butter recall.

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012,2015, we used $270.7$151.3 million of cash in investing activities. We used $257.3$104.6 million, net, of cash in connection with our acquisitions, which was principally associated with the acquisitions of The Daniels Group, Europe's BestHPPC, Empire and Cully & Sully,Belvedere, as well as the repayment of a portion of the Vendor Loan Note associated with the acquisition of Tilda, and $20.4$51.2 million for capital expenditures. We also received $6.9 million of repayments of advances made to HPP.expenditures as discussed further below. We used cash in investing activities of $55.5$206.2 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. We2014, which was principally for the acquisitions of Tilda and Rudi’s and capital expenditures, offset partially by repayments of borrowings from HPPC when it was an equity-method investment. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, we used $45.3cash in investing activities of $406.1 million, of cash which primarily included $350.4 million in connection with our acquisitions of the assetsUK Ambient Grocery Brands, Blue Print, Ella’s Kitchen, and business of 3 Greek Gods, Danival and GG UniqueFiber. We also used $11.5$72.9 million of cash in investing activities in connection with for capital additions. We used cash in investing activities during fiscal 2010 of $62.8 million, of which $51.4 million was used in connection with our acquisitions of the Sensible Portions business and Churchill Food Products Limited. We also used $11.4 million of cash in investing activities in connection with capital additions.expenditures.

Net cash of $147.4$17.2 million was provided by financing activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.2015. We had proceeds from exercises of stock optionsstocks of $14.2$18.6 million and related excess tax benefits of $25.7 million in the fiscal 2012.year. We also drew $161.0had net borrowings of $49.0 million under our revolving credit facility,Credit Agreement, which was primarily used forto fund the Daniels acquisition offset partially by $32.4of Empire as well as subsequently repay HPPC’s acquired borrowings. We had net short-term borrowing repayments of $54.9 million, of contingent consideration paid which were principally related to the acquisitionsaforementioned repayment of Sensible Portions and The Greek Gods brands.HPPC’s acquired borrowings as well as net repayments related to the timing of rice purchases. In addition, we paid $18.1 million during the period for stock repurchases to satisfy employee payroll tax withholdings. During fiscal 2011,2014, net cash of $7.1$100.8 million was provided by financing activities which was primarily related to borrowings under our Credit Agreement used to fund the acquisitions of Tilda and Rudi’s. During fiscal 2013, net cash of $296.1 million was provided by financing activities. We had proceeds from exercisesexercised of stock options of $17.9$12.8 million and from net borrowingsborrowing under our Credit Agreement of $4.1$263.5 million,. These items were partially offset by $14.8 million of cash which was used to settle the first payment of contingent consideration due in connection with The Greek Gods acquisition. We used cash of $32.4 million in financing activities during fiscal 2010, principally as a result of repaying $33.4 million of outstanding borrowings, which was partially offset by $2.1 million of cash proceeds from stock option exercises.fund acquisitions.

In our internal evaluations, we also use the non-GAAP financial measure “operating free cash flow.” The difference between operating free cash flow and net cash provided by operating activities, which is the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, is that operating free cash flow reflects the impact of capital expenditures. Since capital spending is essential to maintaining our operational capabilities, we believe that it is a recurring and necessary use of cash. As such, we believe investors should also consider capital spending when evaluating our cash from operating activities. We view operating free cash flow as an important measure because it is one factor in evaluating the amount of cash available for discretionary investments.

Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
(amounts in thousands)2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Cash flow provided by operating activities$121,960
 $58,658
 $71,030
$185,482
 $184,768
 $120,962
Purchase of property, plant and equipment(20,427) (11,490) (11,428)(51,217) (41,611) (72,877)
Operating free cash flow$101,533
 $47,168
 $59,602
$134,265
 $143,157
 $48,085


3040




Our operating free cash flow was $101.5$134.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, an increase2015, a decrease of $54.4$8.9 million from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.2014. The increasedecrease in our operating free cash flow primarily resulted from $34.3 million in pre-tax charges due to the increasevoluntary nut butter recall, working capital requirements on a higher sales base, as well as higher capital expenditures. Our recent capital expenditures principally relate to the expansion of our production facilities in the United Kingdom to accommodate new products and increased volume, such as chilled desserts, spreads and ready-to-heat rice products, and capital improvements in our cash flow from operations, as discussed above. Our operating free cash flow forHain Pure Protein segment and other facilities in the year ended June 30, 2011 decreased $12.4 million fromUnited States to accommodate demand and increase productivity, including the year ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in our operating free cash flow resulted from the decrease in our cash flow from operations, as discussed above. Our capital spending has increased slightly over historical levels as a resultrelocation of one of our recent acquisitions.BluePrint cold-pressed juice facilities from New York to Pennsylvania. We expect that our capital spending for the next fiscal year will be approximately $50 million. Our anticipated significant capital expenditures during fiscal 2013million, which will include the acquisition of equipment for a new non-dairy production facility in Europecontinued improvement and the expansion of certain of our Fakenham, United Kingdom production facility to accommodate new products and increased volume.current manufacturing facilities.

We have $150 million in aggregate principal amount of 10 year senior notes due May 2, 2016 issued in a private placement. The notes bear interest at 5.98%, payable semi-annually on November 2 and May 2. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, $150.02015, $150.0 million of the senior notes was outstanding. We currently intend to refinance these borrowings on or before the maturity date and therefore are reviewing our financing alternatives.
We also have a credit agreement
On December 12, 2014, we entered into the Credit Agreement which provides us with a $600 million$1 billion revolving credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”) expiring in July 2015.which may be increased by an additional uncommitted $350 million provided certain conditions are met. The Credit Agreement was increased on August 20, 2012 from $400 million to $600 million upon the exercise of an existing $100 million accordion feature, which feature was increased to $200 million.expires in December 2019. Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a base rate (greaterBase Rate or a Eurocurrency Rate (both of which are defined in the applicable prime rate or Federal Funds RateCredit Agreement) plus an applicable margin) or, at our option,margin, which is determined in accordance with a leverage-based pricing grid, as set forth in the reserve adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin.Credit Agreement. Borrowings may be used to provide working capital, finance capital expenditures and permitted acquisitions, refinance certain existing indebtedness and for other lawful corporate purposes. As of June 30, 20122015 and 2011,June 30, 2014, there were $240.0$660.2 million and $79.0$614.5 million of borrowings outstanding, respectively, under the Credit Facility.Agreement.

The Credit Agreement and the notes are guaranteed by substantially all of our current and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries. We are required by the terms of the Credit Agreement and the senior notes to comply with financial and other customary affirmative and negative covenants for facilities and notes of this nature.

Tilda maintains short-term borrowing arrangements primarily used to fund the purchase of rice from India and other countries.  The maximum borrowings permitted under all such arrangements are £50 million.  Outstanding borrowings are secured by the current assets of Tilda, typically have six month terms and bear interest at variable rates typically based on LIBOR plus a margin. As of June 30, 2015, there was $29.6 million of borrowings outstanding under these arrangements.

Obligations for all debt instruments, capital and operating leases and other contractual obligations as of June 30, 20122015 are as follows:
Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
(amounts in thousands)Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years ThereafterTotal Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years Thereafter
Long-term debt obligations (1)$443,084
 $15,297
 $30,312
 $397,475
 $
$916,596
 $51,951
 $32,447
 $832,198
 $
Capital lease obligations66
 30
 36
 
 
Operating lease obligations97,290
 12,566
 20,152
 12,883
 51,689
98,851
 15,695
 22,551
 17,168
 43,437
Purchase obligations14,582
 1,975
 9,407
 3,200
 
293,321
 248,516
 41,180
 3,625
 
Other long-term liabilities (2)203,999
 174,217
 29,782
 
 
Other contractual obligations (2)
11,189
 1,850
 7,489
 1,850
 
Total contractual obligations$759,021
 $204,085
 $89,689
 $413,558
 $51,689
$1,319,957
 $318,012
 $103,667
 $854,841
 $43,437

(1)Including interest.
(2)Amounts include contingent consideration arrangements and employment contracts. Additionally, as of June 30, 2015, we had non-current unrecognized tax benefits of $2.3 million for which we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future cash flows. As a result, this amount has not been included in the table above.

On October 24, 2012, we filed a “well-known seasoned issuer” shelf registration statement with the SEC which registers an indeterminate amount of securities for future sale. The shelf registration statement expires on October 24, 2015. We expect to file a similar updated shelf registration statement on or before the expiration date.

(1) Including interest.
(2) As of June 30, 2012, we had non-current unrecognized tax benefits of $1.1 million for which we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future cash flows. As a result, this amount has not been included in the table above.


41



We believe that our cash on hand of $29.9$166.9 million at June 30, 2012,2015, as well as projected cash flows from operations and availability under our Credit Agreement are sufficient to fund our working capital needs in the ordinary course of business, anticipated fiscal 20132016 capital expenditures of approximately $50 million, and the $27.9 million of debt and lease obligations described inother expected cash requirements for at least the table above, during the 2013 fiscal year. Furthermore, our discontinued operations are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's liquidity and capital resources.next twelve months.



Critical Accounting Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The policies below have been identified as the critical accounting policies we use which require us to make estimates and assumptions and exercise judgment that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and amounts of income

31


and expenses during the reporting periods presented. We believe in the quality and reasonableness of our critical accounting policies;estimates; however, it is possible that materially different amounts wouldmight be reported under different conditions or using assumptions, estimates or making judgments different from those that we have applied. Our critical accounting policies are as follows, including our methodology for estimates made and assumptions used:

Revenue Recognition

Sales are recognized when the earnings process is complete, which occurs when products are shipped in accordance with terms of agreements, title and risk of loss transfer to customers, collection is probable and pricing is fixed or determinable. Sales are reported net of sales and promotion incentives, which include trade discounts and promotions and certain coupon costs. Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are included in reported sales. Allowances for cash discounts are recorded in the period in which the related sale is recognized.

Sales and Promotion Incentives
We offer a variety of sales
Sales incentives and promotions includinginclude price discounts, slotting fees and coupons to our customers and to consumersare used to support sales of the Company'sCompany’s products. These incentives are deducted from our gross sales to determine reported net sales. The recognition of expense for these programs involves the use of judgment related to performance and redemption estimates. Differences between estimated expense and actual redemptions are normally insignificant and recognized as a change in estimate in the period such change occurs.

Trade Promotions. Accruals for trade promotions are recorded primarily at the time a product is sold to the customer based on expected levels of performance. Settlement of these liabilities typically occurs in subsequent periods primarily through an authorization process for deductions taken by a customer from amounts otherwise due to the Company.

Coupon Redemption. Coupon redemption costs are accrued in the period in which the coupons are offered, based on estimates of redemption rates that are developed by management. Management estimates are based on recommendations from independent coupon redemption clearing-houses as well as on historical information. Should actual redemption rates vary from amounts estimated, adjustments to accruals may be required.

Valuation of Accounts and Chargebacks Receivable

We perform ongoingroutine credit evaluations on existing and new customers daily.customers. We apply reserves for delinquent or uncollectible trade receivables based on a specific identification methodology and also apply a general reserve based on the experience we have with our trade receivables aging categories. Credit losses have been within our expectations in recent years. While Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates Sam’s Club and ASDA, together represented approximately 9%, and United Natural Foods, Inc. represented approximately 20% and a second customer represented approximately 8% of our trade receivable balance at June 30, 2012,2015, we believe there is no significant or unusual credit exposure at this time.

Based on cash collection history and other statistical analysis, we estimate the amount of unauthorized deductions that our customers have taken that we expect will be collectible and repaid in the near future in the form of a chargeback receivable. While our estimate of this receivable balance could be different had we used different assumptions and made different judgments, historically our cash collections of this type of receivable have been within our expectations and no significant write-offs have occurred during the most recent three fiscal years.


42



There can be no assurance that we would have the same experience with our receivables during different economic conditions, or with changes in business conditions, such as consolidation within the food industry and/or a change in the way we market and sell our products.

Inventory

Our inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market, utilizing the first-in, first-out method. We provide write-downs for finished goods expected to become non-saleable due to age and specifically identify and provide for slow moving or obsolete raw ingredients and packaging.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Our property, plant and equipment is carried at cost and depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the estimated useful lives or lease life, whichever is shorter. We believe the asset lives assigned to our property, plant and equipment are within the ranges/guidelines generally used in food manufacturing and distribution businesses. Our manufacturing plants and distribution centers, and their related assets, are reviewed to determine if any impairment exists whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment testing requires estimates and judgments to be made by management with respect to items such as underlying cash flow projections, future sales volumes and growth rates. At this time, we believe there are no impairments of the carrying values of such assets.

32


Accounting for Acquisitions

Our growth strategy has included the acquisition of numerous brands and businesses. The purchase price of these acquisitions has been determined after due diligence of the acquired business, market research, strategic planning, and the forecasting of expected future results and synergies. Estimated future results and expected synergies are subject to judgment as we integrate each acquisition and attempt to leverage resources.
The accounting for the acquisitions we have made requires that the assets and liabilities acquired, as well as any contingent consideration that may be part of the agreement, be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. This requires management to make significant estimates in determining the fair values, especially with respect to intangible assets, including estimates of expected cash flows, expected cost savings and the appropriate weighted average cost of capital. As a result of these significant judgments to be made we oftenoccasionally obtain the assistance of independent valuation firms. We complete these assessments as soon as practical after the closing dates. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Because the fair value and the estimated useful life of an intangible asset is a subjective estimate, it is reasonably likely that circumstances may cause the estimate to change. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In connection with some of our acquisitions, we have undertaken certain restructurings of the acquired businesses to realize efficiencies and potential cost savings. Our restructuring activities include the elimination of duplicate facilities, reductions in staffing levels, and other costs associated with exiting certain activities of the businesses we acquire.

It is typical for us to rationalize the product lines of businesses acquired within the first year or two after an acquisition. These rationalizations often include elimination of portions of the product lines acquired, the reformulation of recipes and formulas used to produce the products, and the elimination of customers that do not meet our credit standards. In certain instances, it is necessary to change co-packers used to produce the products. Each of these activities soon after an acquisition may have the effect of reducing sales to a level lower than that of the business acquired and operated prior to our acquisition. As a result, pro forma information regarding sales cannot and should not be construed as representative of our growth rates.

Stock Based Compensation

We provide compensation benefits in the form of stock options and restricted stock to employees and non-employee directors. The cost of stock based compensation is recorded at fair value at the date of grant and expensed in the consolidated statement of income over the requisite service period. The fair value of stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is recognized in expense over the vesting period of the options using the straight-line method. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires various assumptions, including the expected volatility of our stock, the expected term of the option, the risk-free interest rate and the expected dividend yield. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is recognized in expense over the vesting period using the straight-line method. For awards that contain a market

43



condition, expense is recognized over the derived service period using an accelerated recognition method. We recognize compensation expense for only that portion of stock based awards that are expected to vest. We utilize historical employee termination behavior to determine our estimated forfeiture rates. If the actual forfeitures differ from those estimated by management, adjustments to compensation expense will be made in future periods.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The carrying value of goodwill, which is allocated to the Company’s reporting units, and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested annually for impairment as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, and on an interim basis if events or circumstances warrant it. Events or circumstances that might indicate an interim valuation is warranted include unexpected changes in business conditions, economic factors or a sustained decline in the Company’s market capitalization below the Company’s carrying value. InDuring the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012,annual impairment test, we elected to early adopt the new accounting guidance included in ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU No. 2011-08 permits entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test included in U.S. GAAP. Entities are not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless they determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount. We applied this guidance toFor our fiscal 2012 annual2015 goodwill impairment testing conducted during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Wetest, we determined that it was not necessary for twosix of our nine reporting units to apply the traditional two-step quantitative impairment test in ASC 350 based on qualitative information that it is more likely than not that the fair value of those reporting units exceeded their carrying values.

The traditional two-step impairment test requires us to estimate the fair values of our reporting units. The estimate of the fair values of our reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment. We generally use a blended analysis of the present value of discounted cash flows and the market valuation approach. The discounted cash flow model uses the present values of estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and external economic factors in estimating our future cash flows. The assumptions we use in our evaluations include projections of growth rates and profitability, our estimated working capital needs, as well as our weighted

33


average cost of capital. The market valuation approach indicates the fair value of a reporting unit based on a comparison to comparable publicly traded firms in similar businesses. Estimates used in the market value approach include the identification of similar companies with comparable business factors. Changes in economic and operating conditions impacting the assumptions we made could result in additional goodwill impairment in future periods. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the goodwill of that reporting unit is potentially impaired. At this point we proceed to the second step of the analysis, wherein we measure the excess, if any, of the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill over its implied fair value, and record the impairment loss indicated.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of acquired trade names and trademarks. We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. We measure the fair value of these assets using the relief from royalty method. This method assumes that the trade names and trademarks have value to the extent their owner is relieved from paying royalties for the benefits received. We estimate the future revenues for the associated brands, the appropriate royalty rate and the weighted average cost of capital. In

During the fourththird quarter of fiscal 2012, we elected to early adopt ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets2015, certain impairment indicators were present for Impairment. ASU No. 2012-02 permits entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. Entities are not required to calculatein the fair valueUnited Kingdom segment (the Company’s New Covent Garden Soup Co.® trademark). The Company completed an interim impairment test, and as a result, recorded a non-cash partial impairment charge of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless they determine$5.5 million in that it is more likely than not that such asset is impaired. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.quarter.

We completed our annual impairment testing of goodwill and our trade names as of April 1, 2012, with the assistance of an independent valuation firm.2015. The analysis and assessment of these assets indicated that no impairment was required at that time as either the fair values equaled or exceeded the recorded carrying values (for our indefinite-lived intangible assets and certain reporting units), or as described above, the qualitative assessment resulted in a determination that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount (for certain of our reporting units). Although we believe our assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions or changes in the future may result in different conclusions and expose us to impairment charges in the future. The fair value of our EuropeHain Daniels reporting unit, and certain of its intangible assets, exceeded its carrying value by less thanapproximately 10%. ThisAs of April 1, 2015, this reporting unit represented approximately 2%22% of our goodwill balance, asand its indefinite-lived intangible assets represented approximately 25% of April 1, 2012.our consolidated indefinite-lived intangible asset balance. Holding all other assumptions constant at the testing date, a one percentage point increase in the discount rate used in the testing of this unit would reduce the estimated fair value belowvalues of the respective assets to approximately its carrying value, indicating a possible impairment. While wevalue. We believe this operation can support the value of goodwill reported,and intangible assets recorded based on our current estimates of future results of operations and cash flows, however this reporting unit is the most sensitive to changes in the underlying assumptions.
Other than described above, there were no impairment charges recorded during fiscal 2013, 2014 or 2015.


44



Valuation Allowances for Deferred Tax Assets

Deferred tax assets arise when we recognize expenses in our financial statements that will be allowed as income tax deductions in future periods. Deferred tax assets also include unused tax net operating losses and tax credits that we are allowed to carry forward to future years. Accounting rules permit us to carry deferred tax assets on the balance sheet at full value as long as it is “more likely than not” the deductions, losses, or credits will be used in the future. A valuation allowance must be recorded against a deferred tax asset if this test cannot be met. Our determination of our valuation allowances are based upon a number of assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and the relative proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Concluding that a valuation allowance is not required is difficult when there is significant negative evidence that is objective and verifiable, such as cumulative losses in recent years.
We believe that the cumulativehave deferred tax benefits related to foreign net operating losses, incurred by the Companyprimarily in the United Kingdom and Germany, and to a lesser extent in Belgium, against which we have recorded valuation allowances. The losses in the United Kingdom were recorded prior to the acquisition of Daniels represented sufficient evidenceand in Germany were the result of certain factory start-up costs incurred in prior years for management to determine that a full valuation allowance forthe Company’s plant-based beverage facility. Under current tax law in these jurisdictions, our United Kingdom deferred tax assets was appropriate, whichcarryforward losses have no expiration. If the Company initially recorded in the third quarteris able to realize any of fiscal 2010. Until an appropriate level of profitability is attained such that thethese carryforward losses may by utilized, we expect to maintain a valuation allowance on those net deferred tax assets.
If we generate taxable income in the future, onthe provision for income taxes will be reduced by a sustained basis in the United Kingdom or other jurisdictions in a manner such that those prior losses (for which we have recorded full valuation allowances) may be utilized, our conclusion regarding the need for full valuation allowances in these tax jurisdictions could change, resulting in the reversal of some or allrelease of the corresponding valuation allowances. If these operations generate taxable income prior to reaching profitability on a sustained basis, we would reverse a portion of the valuation allowance related to the corresponding realized tax benefit for that period, without changing our conclusions on the need for a full valuation allowance against the remaining net deferred tax assets.allowance.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for information regarding recent accounting pronouncements.



Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Information

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Rule 3b-6 of

34


the Private Securities ExchangeLitigation Reform Act of 1934. Words1995. Forward-looking statements are predictions based on expectations and projections about future events, and are not statements of historical fact. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plan,” “continue,” “expect,” “expected,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “believe,” “may,” “potential,” “can,” “positioned,” “should,” “future,” “look forward”“plan”, “continue”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “predict”, “project”, “estimate”, “likely”, “believe”, “might”, “seek”, “may”, “potential”, “can”, “should”, “could”, “future” and similar expressions, or the negative of those expressions, may identify forward-looking statements.expressions. These forward-looking statements include, the Company'samong other things, our beliefs or expectations relating to: (i) the integration of our brands and the resulting impact thereof; (ii) the availability of alternative co-packers and the impact to our business if we are required to changestrategy, our significant co-packing arrangements; (iii)growth strategy, the levelseasonality of our sales made outside the United States; (iv)business, and our intention to grow through acquisitions as well as internal expansion; (v) our long-term strategy for sustainable growth; (vi) the economic environment; (vii) our supportresults of increased consumer consumption; (viii) higher input costs; (ix) the integration of acquisitionsoperations and the opportunities for growth related thereto; (x) the completion of divestitures; (xi) the repatriation of foreign cash balances; (xii) our cash and cash equivalent investments having no significant exposure to interest rate risk; (xiii) our expectations regarding our capital spending for fiscal year 2013; and (xiv) our sources of liquidity being adequate to fund our anticipated operating and cash requirements for the next twelve months. financial condition.

Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following:

our ability to achieve our guidance for net salesgeneral economic and earnings per diluted share in fiscal year 2013 given the economic environment in the U.S. and other markets that we sell products as well as economic, political and business conditions generally and their effect on our customers and consumers' product preferences, and our business, financial condition and results of operations;
our expectations for our business for fiscal year 2013 and its positioning for the future;
changes in estimates or judgments related to our impairment analysis of goodwill and other intangible assets, as well as with respect to the Company's valuation allowances of its deferred tax assets;
our ability to implement our business and acquisition strategy;
the ability of our joint venture investments, including HPP, to successfully execute their business plans;
our ability to realize sustainable growth generally and from investments in core brands, offering new products and our focus on cost containment, productivity, cash flow and margin enhancement in particular;
our ability to effectively integrate our acquisitions;
our ability to successfully consummate our proposed divestitures;
the effects on our results of operations from the impacts of foreign exchange;market conditions;
competition;
the success and cost of introducing new products as well as our ability to increase prices on existing products;
availability and retention of key personnel;
our reliance on third party distributors, manufacturers and suppliers;
our ability to maintain existing customers and secure and integrate new customers;
our ability to respond to changes and trends in customer and consumer demand, preferences and consumption;
international salesour reliance on third party distributors, manufacturers and operations;suppliers;
the consolidation or loss of a significant customer;
our ability to introduce new products and improve existing products;
availability and retention of key personnel;
our ability to effectively integrate our acquisitions;
our ability to successfully consummate any proposed divestitures;
liabilities arising from potential product recalls, market withdrawals or product liability claims;
outbreaks of diseases or food-borne illnesses;
potential litigation;
the availability of organic and natural ingredients;
our ability to manage our supply chain effectively;
changes in fuel, raw material and commodity costs;
effects of climate change on our business and operations;
our ability to offset input cost increases;
the interruption, disruption or loss of operations at one or more of our manufacturing facilities;
the loss of one or more of our independent co-packers;
the disruption of our transportation systems;

45



risks associated with expansion into countries in which we have no prior operating experience;
risks associates with our international sales and operations, including foreign currency risks;
impairment in the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets;
our ability to use our trademarks;
reputational damage;
changes in, or the failure to comply with, government laws and regulations;
the availability of natural and organic ingredients;
the loss of oneliabilities or more of our manufacturing facilities;claims with respect to environmental matters;
our ability to use our trademarks;
reputational damage;
product liability;
seasonality;
litigation;
the Company's reliance on itsindependent certification for our products;
a breach of security measures;
our reliance on our information technology systems;
effects of general global capital and credit market issues on our liquidity and cost of borrowing;
potential liabilities not covered by insurance;
the ability of joint venture investments to successfully execute business plans;
dilution in the value of our common shares; and
the other risk factors described in Item 1A1A. Risk Factors above.

As a result of the foregoing and other factors, no assurance can be given as to the future results, levels of activity and achievements of the Company, and neither the Company nor any person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements.




46



Supplementary Quarterly Financial Data:

Unaudited quarterly financial data (in thousands, except per share amounts) for fiscal 20122015 and 20112014 is summarized as follows. The sum of the net income per share from continuing and discontinued operations for each of the four quarters may not equal the net income per share for the full year, as presented, due to rounding.
 Three Months Ended
 
June 30,
2015
 March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 September 30, 2014
Net sales$698,136
 $662,739
 $696,383
 $631,257
Gross profit167,697
 157,749
 167,327
 125,844
Operating income (a)74,712
 60,194
 74,012
 28,827
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investees73,637
 51,554
 65,198
 24,901
Income from continuing operations71,072
 33,394
 44,575
 18,855
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 
Net income (a) (b)71,072
 33,394
 44,575
 18,855
        
Basic net income per common share:       
   From continuing operations$0.69
 $0.33
 $0.44
 $0.19
   From discontinued operations
 
 
 
Net income per common share - basic$0.69
 $0.33
 $0.44
 $0.19
        
Diluted net income per common share:       
   From continuing operations$0.68
 $0.32
 $0.43
 $0.18
   From discontinued operations
 
 
 
Net income per common share - diluted$0.68
 $0.32
 $0.43
 $0.18

 Three Months Ended
 
June 30,
2014
 March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 September 30, 2013
Net sales$583,828
 $557,420
 $534,879
 $477,484
Gross profit152,200
 152,793
 143,077
 119,123
Operating income (c)60,023
 63,629
 64,313
 39,772
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investees55,719
 57,683
 58,358
 35,834
Income from continuing operations35,724
 38,018
 40,083
 27,655
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
 (2,777) 1,148
 
Net income (c) (d)35,724
 35,241
 41,231
 27,655
        
Basic net income/(loss) per common share:       
   From continuing operations$0.36
 $0.38
 $0.42
 $0.29
   From discontinued operations
 (0.03) 0.01
 
Net income per common share - basic$0.36
 $0.35
 $0.43
 $0.29
        
Diluted net income/(loss) per common share:       
   From continuing operations$0.35
 $0.37
 $0.41
 $0.28
   From discontinued operations
 (0.03) 0.01
 
Net income per common share - diluted$0.35
 $0.34
 $0.42
 $0.28


3547



(a)Operating income was impacted by approximately $4.4 million ($3.3 million net of tax) for the three months ended September 30, 2014, $3.7 million ($2.9 million net of tax) for the three months ended December 31, 2014, $5.8 million ($3.8 million net of tax) for the three months ended March 31, 2015, and $4.9 million ($3.7 million net of tax) for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as a result of acquisition related expenses, restructuring and integration charges, as well as factory start-up costs. Additionally, operating income was impacted by approximately $6.5 million ($5.0 million net of tax) for the three months ended March 31, 2015, related to a non-cash partial impairment charge related to a United Kingdom indefinite-lived intangible asset and a write-off of leasehold improvements due to the relocation of our New York based BluePrint manufacturing facility. Operating income was further impacted by approximately $22.8 million ($14.2 million net of tax) for the three months ended September 30, 2014, $9.3 million ($5.7 million net of tax) for the three months ended December 31, 2014, $0.7 million ($0.5 million net of tax) for the three months ended March 31, 2015, and $1.8 million ($1.1 million net of tax) for the three months ended June 30, 2015, as a result of charges recorded related to the voluntary nut butter recall. Finally, operating income was impacted by $5.7 million ($3.6 million net of tax) for the three months ended June 30, 2015 for charges related to a legal settlement.

(b)Net income was unfavorably impacted by $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, $1.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, related to unrealized foreign currency losses primarily associated with the remeasurement of foreign currency denominated intercompany balances. Net income was favorably impacted by $5.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, related to a gain on the Company’s pre-existing ownership interest in HPPC. Additionally, for the three months ended March 31, 2015, net income was favorably impacted by a $2.9 million non-cash gain on the Company’s pre-existing ownership interest in Empire as well as a realized foreign currency gain of $3.4 million associated with the repayment of the Tilda Vendor Loan Note. Finally, net income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was favorably impacted by $3.7 million related to unrealized foreign currency gains primarily associated with the remeasurement of foreign currency denominated intercompany balances and $20.7 million related to a tax restructuring whereby we changed the United States tax status for one of our international subsidiaries.

(c)Operating income was impacted by approximately $1.7 million ($1.1 million net of tax) for the three months ended September 30, 2013, $3.0 million ($2.1 million net of tax) for the three months ended December 31, 2013, $6.8 million ($4.4 million net of tax) for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and $5.7 million ($4.2 million net of tax) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as a result of acquisition related expenses, restructuring and integration charges, as well as factory start-up costs. Additionally, operating income was impacted by approximately $1.8 million ($.7 million net of tax) for the three months ended December 31, 2013, $0.2 million ($0.2 million net of tax) for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and $1.7 million ($1.0 million net of tax) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as a result of contingent consideration adjustments related to acquisitions.  Finally, operating income was impacted by approximately $6.0 million ($3.8 million net of tax) for the three months ended June 30, 2014, as a result of a charge recorded related to the voluntary nut butter recall.

 Three Months Ended
 September 30, 2011 December 31, 2011 March 31, 2012 
June 30,
2012
Net sales$286,837
 $364,837
 $375,781
 $350,792
Gross profit79,804
 104,585
 104,681
 93,400
Operating income (a)23,837
 36,204
 41,633
 49,854
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investees20,288
 31,597
 37,439
 44,904
Income from continuing operations12,640
 21,080
 24,819
 35,675
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(949) (1,043) (712) (12,285)
Net income (a) (b)11,691
 20,037
 24,107
 23,390
        
Basic net income per common share:       
   From continuing operations$0.29
 $0.48
 $0.56
 $0.80
   From discontinued operations(0.02) (0.03) (0.02) (0.28)
Net income per common share - basic$0.27
 $0.45
 $0.54
 $0.52
        
Diluted net income per common share:       
   From continuing operations$0.28
 $0.46
 $0.54
 $0.77
   From discontinued operations(0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.27)
Net income per common share - diluted$0.26
 $0.44
 $0.52
 $0.50
(d)Net income was favorably impacted by $0.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2013, $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, as a result of gains on the sale of an available for sale investment. Net income was also favorably impacted by $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 as a result of a benefit recorded for a discontinued operation at one of our equity method investees (HHO).


 Three Months Ended
 September 30, 2010 December 31, 2010 March 31, 2011 
June 30,
2011
Net sales$252,015
 $286,174
 $283,484
 $286,873
Gross profit70,405
 85,318
 82,696
 81,418
Operating income (c)20,103
 30,626
 31,864
 28,581
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investees17,660
 27,099
 29,036
 25,132
Income from continuing operations10,544
 17,057
 17,713
 13,657
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(1,448) (789) (943) (809)
Net income (c) (d)9,095
 16,267
 16,772
 12,848
        
Basic net income per common share:       
   From continuing operations$0.25
 $0.40
 $0.41
 $0.31
   From discontinued operations(0.04) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02)
Net income per common share - basic$0.21
 $0.38
 $0.39
 $0.29
        
Diluted net income per common share:       
   From continuing operations$0.24
 $0.38
 $0.40
 $0.30
   From discontinued operations(0.03) (0.01) (0.02) (0.02)
Net income per common share - diluted$0.21
 $0.37
 $0.38
 $0.28
Seasonality


(a) Operating income was impacted by approximately $0.1 million ($0.1 million net of tax) for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and $0.2 million ($0.2 million net of tax) for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as a result of restructuring expenses incurred. Operating income was also impacted by $1.5 million ($1.0 million net of tax) for the

36


three months ended September 30, 2011, $4.8 million ($3.1 million net of tax) for the three months ended December 31, 2011, and $0.5 million ($0.3 million net of tax) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as a result of acquisition related transaction expenses and integration costs incurred. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, operating income was impacted by a net reduction in acquisition related transaction expenses and integration costs of $13.8 million ($13.5 million net of tax), principally related to the reversal of the carrying value of contingent consideration for the Daniels acquisition.

(b) Net income was unfavorably impacted by $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as a result of a discrete tax item related to nondeductible transaction costs and favorably impacted by $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 related to a decrease in the Company's liability for uncertain tax positions as the result of an expiration of the statute of limitations.

(c) Operating income was impacted by approximately $0.2 million ($0.2 million net of tax) for the three months ended September 30, 2010, $0.2 million ($0.2 million net of tax) for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and $0.5 million ($0.4 million net of tax) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as a result of restructuring expenses incurred. Operating income was also impacted by $1.2 million ($0.8 million net of tax) for the three months ended September 30, 2010, $0.6 million ($0.4 million net of tax) for the three months ended December 31, 2010. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, operating income was impacted by a net reduction in acquisition related transaction expenses and integration costs of $2.4 million ($1.5 million net of tax), principally related to adjustments to the carrying value of contingent consideration for the acquisition of the Sensible Portions brand. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, operating income was not significantly impacted by net acquisition related transaction expenses recorded.

(d) Net income was favorably impacted by $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as a result of a discrete tax item related to uncertain tax benefits.

Seasonality
We manufacture and market hot tea products and, as a result, our quarterly results of operations reflect seasonal trends resulting from increased demand for hot tea products in the cooler months of the year. In addition, someCertain of our otherproduct lines have seasonal fluctuations. Hot tea, baking products, (e.g., soups,hot cereal, hot-eating desserts and baking and cereal products) also showsoup sales are stronger sales in the coolercolder months while oursales of snack foodfoods and certain of our prepared food product linesproducts are stronger in the warmer months. In years where there are warm winter seasons,Additionally, with our recent acquisitions of HPPC, Empire and Tilda, our net sales of cooler weather products, which typically increase in our second and third fiscal quarters,earnings may be negatively impacted.
Quarterly fluctuations in our sales volume and operating results are due to a number of factors relating to our business, includingfurther fluctuate based on the timing of trade promotions, advertisingholidays throughout the year. As such, our results of operations and consumer promotionsour cash flows for any particular quarter are not indicative of the results we expect for the full year and other factors, such asour historical seasonality inclement weathermay not be indicative of future quarterly results of operations. For fiscal 2016, we anticipate that our net sales will be the highest in the second fiscal quarter and unanticipated increaseslowest in labor, commodity, energy, insurance or other operating costs. The impact on sales volumethe first fiscal quarter, with the third and operating results duefourth fiscal quarters being generally similar to one another. However, this may be impacted by the timing and extent of these factors can significantly impact our business. For these reasons, you should not rely on our quarterly operating results as indicationsany future acquisitions we complete.



48

Off-Balance

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

At June 30, 2012,2015, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in itemItem 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K that have had or are likely to have a material current or future effect on our consolidated financial statements.


Impact of Inflation

Inflation has caused increased ingredient, fuel, labor and benefits costs and in some cases has materially increased our operating expenses. For more information regarding ingredient costs, see “Item 7A., Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Ingredient Inputs Price Risk.” To the extent competitive and other conditions permit, we seek to recover increased costs through a combination of price increases, new product innovation and by implementing process efficiencies and cost reductions.



Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market Risk

The principal market risks (i.e., the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices) to which the Company is exposed are:

37


interest rates on debt and cash equivalents;
foreign exchange rates, generating translation and transaction gains and losses; and
ingredient inputs.

Interest Rates

We centrally manage our debt and cash equivalents, considering investment opportunities and risks, tax consequences and overall financing strategies. Our cash equivalents consist primarily of commercial paper and obligations of U.S. Government agencies.money market securities. As of June 30, 2012,2015, we had $240.0$660.2 million of variable rate debt outstanding.outstanding under our Credit Agreement. Assuming current cash equivalents and variable rate borrowings, a hypothetical change in average interest rates of one percentage point would not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flowsimpact net interest expense by approximately $4.9 million over the next fiscal year.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

Operating in international markets involves exposure to movements in currency exchange rates, which are volatile at times, and the impact of such movements, if material, could cause adjustments to our financing and operating strategies.

During fiscal 2012,2015, approximately 28.1%41% of our consolidated net sales were generated from sales outside the United States, while such sales outside the United States were 17.9%40% of net sales in 20112014 and 18.9%37% of net sales in 2010.2013. These revenues, along with related expenses and capital purchases are conducted in British Pounds Sterling, Euros and Canadian Dollars.
Sales and operating income would decrease by approximately $50 million and $3.8 million, respectively, if average foreign exchange rates had been lower by 5% against the U.S. dollar in fiscal 2015. These amounts were determined by considering the impact of a hypothetical foreign exchange rate on the sales and operating income of the Company’s international operations. We enter into forward contracts for the purpose of reducing the effect of exchange rate changes primarily on forecasted intercompany purchases by our Canadian subsidiary, which we have designated as cash flow hedges. We had approximately $16.6$47.2 million in notional amounts of forward contracts at June 30, 2012.2015. See Note 14,15, Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value.Value, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may also impact the Stockholders’ Equity of the Company. Amounts invested in our non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates of the last day of our fiscal year.each reporting period. Any resulting cumulative translation adjustments are recorded in Stockholders’ Equity as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The cumulative translation adjustments component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income decreased $13.6$104.3 million, net of tax, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.2015.


49


Ingredient Inputs Price Risk

The Company purchases ingredient inputs such as wheat,almonds, corn, dairy, fruit and vegetables, oils, rice, soybeans almonds, canola oil and fruitwheat, as well as packaging materials, to be used in its operations. These inputs are subject to price fluctuations that may create price risk. We do not attempt to hedge against fluctuations in the prices of the ingredients by using future, forward, option or other derivative instruments. As a result, the majority of our future purchases of these items are subject to changes in price. We may enter into fixed purchase commitments in an attempt to secure an adequate supply of specific ingredients. These agreements are tied to specific market prices. Market risk is estimated as a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in the weighted-average cost of our primary inputs as of June 30, 2012.2015. Based on our cost of goods sold during the twelve months ended June 30, 2012,2015, such a change would have resulted in an increase or decrease to cost of sales of approximately $62$130 million. We attempt to offset the impact of input cost increases with a combination of cost savings initiatives and efficiencies and price increases to our customers.


50




Item 8.         Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The following consolidated financial statements of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries are included in Item 8:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 20122015 and 20112014
Consolidated Statements of Income - Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity - Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statement schedule of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries is included in Item 15 (a):

Schedule II - Valuation and qualifying accounts

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the SEC are not required under the

38


related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.



3951





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Stockholders and Board of Directors of
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 20122015 and 2011,2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended June 30, 2012.2015. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries at June 30, 20122015 and 2011,2014, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended June 30, 2012,2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and SubsidiariesSubsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012,2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated August 29, 201221, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


/s/ ErnstERNST & YoungYOUNG LLP


Jericho, New York
August 29, 201221, 2015


4052



THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
JUNE 30, 20122015 AND 2011JUNE 30, 2014
(In thousands, except share amounts)
June 30,June 30, June 30,
2012 20112015 2014
ASSETS     (Note)
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$29,895
 $27,517
$166,922
 $123,751
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,661 and $1,230166,677
 139,803
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $896 and $1,586320,197
 287,915
Inventories186,440
 170,739
382,211
 320,251
Deferred income taxes15,834
 13,993
20,758
 23,780
Prepaid expenses and other current assets19,864
 14,306
42,931
 47,906
Assets of businesses held for sale30,098
 4,708
Total current assets448,808
 371,066
933,019
 803,603
Property, plant and equipment, net148,475
 110,423
344,262
 310,661
Goodwill702,556
 565,879
1,136,079
 1,134,368
Trademarks and other intangible assets, net310,378
 207,384
647,754
 651,482
Investments and joint ventures45,100
 50,557
2,305
 36,511
Other assets18,276
 12,644
33,851
 28,692
Assets of businesses held for sale
 15,551
Total assets$1,673,593
 $1,333,504
$3,097,270
 $2,965,317
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Current liabilities:      
Accounts payable$123,634
 $90,699
$251,999
 $239,162
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities60,469
 72,013
79,167
 84,906
Income taxes payable5,074
 2,925
Current portion of long-term debt296
 633
31,275
 100,096
Liabilities of businesses held for sale13,336
 4,413
Total current liabilities202,809
 170,683
362,441
 424,164
Long-term debt, less current portion390,288
 229,540
812,608
 767,827
Deferred income taxes107,633
 51,921
145,297
 148,439
Other noncurrent liabilities8,261
 13,661
5,237
 5,020
Liabilities of businesses held for sale
 996
Total liabilities708,991
 466,801
1,325,583
 1,345,450
Stockholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock - $.01 par value, authorized 5,000,000 shares, no shares issued
 

 
Common stock - $.01 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued 46,155,912
and 45,045,097 shares
462
 451
Additional paid-in capital616,197
 582,972
Common stock - $.01 par value, authorized 150,000,000 shares, issued 105,840,586 and 103,143,018 shares (see Note 2)1,058
 1,031
Additional paid-in capital (see Note 2)1,073,671
 969,182
Retained earnings375,111
 295,886
797,514
 629,618
Accumulated other comprehensive income(5,383) 7,144
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(42,406) 60,128
986,387
 886,453
1,829,837
 1,659,959
Less: 1,202,804 and 1,144,610 shares of treasury stock, at cost(21,785) (19,750)
Less: 3,229,342 and 2,906,160 shares of treasury stock, at cost (See Note 2)(58,150) (40,092)
Total stockholders’ equity964,602
 866,703
1,771,687
 1,619,867
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$1,673,593
 $1,333,504
$3,097,270
 $2,965,317

Note: The balance sheet at June 30, 2014 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date adjusted to retroactively reflect a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend. See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4153



THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 AND 20102013
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Net sales$1,378,247
 $1,108,546
 $890,007
$2,688,515
 $2,153,611
 $1,734,683
Cost of sales995,777
 788,709
 641,249
2,069,898
 1,586,418
 1,259,823
Gross profit382,470
 319,837
 248,758
618,617
 567,193
 474,860
Selling, general and administrative expenses237,595
 208,610
 165,918
348,517
 311,288
 274,750
Acquisition related (credits) expenses and restructuring charges(6,653) 53
 2,751
Amortization/impairment of acquired intangibles23,495
 15,600
 12,192
Acquisition related expenses, restructuring and integration charges, net8,860
 12,568
 13,606
Operating income151,528
 111,174
 80,089
237,745
 227,737
 174,312
Interest and other expenses, net17,300
 12,247
 11,797
22,455
 20,143
 20,490
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investees134,228
 98,927
 68,292
215,290
 207,594
 153,822
Provision for income taxes41,154
 37,808
 28,362
47,883
 70,099
 34,324
Equity in net (income) loss of equity-method investees(1,140) 2,148
 1,739
Equity in net (income) of equity-method investees(489) (3,985) (295)
Income from continuing operations94,214
 58,971
 38,191
167,896
 141,480
 119,793
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(14,989) (3,989) (9,572)
Discontinued operations
 (1,629) (5,137)
Net income$79,225
 $54,982
 $28,619
$167,896
 $139,851
 $114,656
          
Basic net income/(loss) per common share:     
Basic net income per common share:     
From continuing operations$2.12
 $1.37
 $0.93
$1.65
 $1.45
 $1.30
From discontinued operations(0.33) (0.10) (0.23)
 (0.02) (0.06)
Net income per common share - basic$1.79
 $1.27
 $0.70
$1.65
 $1.43
 $1.24
          
Diluted net income/(loss) per common share:     
Diluted net income per common share:     
From continuing operations$2.05
 $1.32
 $0.92
$1.62
 $1.42
 $1.26
From discontinued operations(0.32) (0.09) (0.23)
 (0.02) (0.05)
Net income per common share - diluted$1.73
 $1.23
 $0.69
$1.62
 $1.40
 $1.21
          
Shares used in the calculation of net income per common share:          
Basic44,360
 43,165
 40,890
101,703
 97,750
 92,352
Diluted45,847
 44,537
 41,514
103,421
 100,006
 95,144
Note: Share and per share amounts for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 have been retroactively adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend. See notes to consolidated financial statements.


4254



THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 AND 20102013
(In thousands)


 Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014 Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013
 
Pre-tax
amount
 Tax (expense) benefit After-tax amount 
Pre-tax
amount
 Tax (expense) benefit After-tax amount 
Pre-tax
amount
 Tax (expense) benefit After-tax amount
Net income    $167,896
     $139,851
     $114,656
                  
Other comprehensive income (loss):                 
Foreign currency translation adjustments$(107,887) $4,678
 (103,209) $90,277
 $348
 90,625
 $(26,086) $959
 (25,127)
Change in deferred gains (losses) on cash flow hedging instruments2,093
 (512) 1,581
 (1,734) 330
 (1,404) 705
 (176) 529
Change in unrealized gain on available for sale investment(1,575) 669
 (906) (3,058) 1,216
 (1,842) 4,512
 (1,782) 2,730
Total other comprehensive income (loss)$(107,369) $4,835
 $(102,534) $85,485
 $1,894
 $87,379
 $(20,869) $(999) $(21,868)
                  
Total comprehensive (loss) income    $65,362
     $227,230
     $92,788

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



55



THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30 2015, 2014 AND 2013
(In thousands, except per share and share amounts)

 Common Stock Additional       
Accumulated
Other
  
   Amount Paid-in Retained Treasury Stock Comprehensive  
 Shares at $.01 Capital Earnings Shares Amount Income (Loss) Total
Balance at July 1, 200941,699,509
 $417
 $503,161
 $212,285
 1,001,898
 $(16,309) $1,769
 $701,323
Net income      28,619
       28,619
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax            (9,051) (9,051)
Change in deferred gains on cash flow hedging instruments, net of tax            (49) (49)
Change in unrealized loss on available for sale investment, net of tax            460
 460
Total comprehensive income              $19,979
Issuance of common stock pursuant to compensation plans336,111
 3
 2,136
         2,139
Stock based compensation income tax effects    164
         164
Shares withheld for payment of employee payroll taxes due on shares issued under stock based compensation plans        70,807
 (1,220)   (1,220)
Stock based compensation charge    6,979
         6,979
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition1,558,442
 16
 35,377
         35,393
Issuance of common stock in connection with license agreement52,615
 1
 965
         966
Balance at June 30, 201043,646,677
 $437
 $548,782
 $240,904
 1,072,705
 $(17,529) $(6,871) $765,723
Net income      54,982
       54,982
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax            14,641
 14,641
Change in deferred gains on cash flow hedging instruments, net of tax            (724) (724)
Change in unrealized loss on available for sale investment, net of tax            98
 98
Total comprehensive income              $68,997
Issuance of common stock pursuant to compensation plans1,156,235
 12
 17,900
         17,912
Stock based compensation income tax effects    2,525
         2,525
Shares withheld for payment of employee payroll taxes due on shares issued under stock based compensation plans        71,905
 (2,221)   (2,221)
Stock based compensation charge    9,031
         9,031
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition242,185
 2
 4,734
         4,736
Balance at June 30, 201145,045,097
 $451
 $582,972
 $295,886
 1,144,610
 $(19,750) $7,144
 $866,703
 Common Stock Additional       
Accumulated
Other
  
   Amount Paid-in Retained Treasury Stock Comprehensive  
 Shares at $.01 Capital Earnings Shares Amount Income (Loss) Total
Balance at June 30, 201292,303,356
 $923
 $615,736
 $375,111
 2,405,686
 $(21,785) $(5,383) $964,602
Net income      114,656
       114,656
Other comprehensive income            (21,868) (21,868)
Issuance of common stock pursuant to compensation plans2,343,758
 23
 19,920
         19,943
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions3,396,944
 34
 102,602
         102,636
Stock based compensation income tax effects    17,016
         17,016
Shares withheld for payment of employee payroll taxes due on shares issued under stock based compensation plans        266,464
 (8,440)   (8,440)
Stock based compensation charge    13,010
         13,010
Balance at June 30, 201398,044,058
 $980
 $768,284
 $489,767
 2,672,150
 $(30,225) $(27,251) $1,201,555
Net income      $139,851
       139,851
Other comprehensive income            $87,379
 87,379
Issuance of common stock pursuant to compensation plans1,539,126
 15
 $14,919
   (12,664) 156
   15,090
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions3,559,834
 36
 $159,485
         159,521
Stock based compensation income tax effects    $14,046
         14,046
Shares withheld for payment of employee payroll taxes due on shares issued under stock based compensation plans        246,674
 (10,023)   (10,023)
Stock based compensation charge    $12,448
         12,448
Balance at June 30, 2014103,143,018
 $1,031
 $969,182
 $629,618
 2,906,160
 $(40,092) $60,128
 $1,619,867







4356





THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSSTATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 AND 20102013
(In thousands, except per share and share amounts)

 Common Stock Additional       
Accumulated
Other
  
   Amount Paid-in Retained Treasury Stock Comprehensive  
 Shares at $.01 Capital Earnings Shares Amount Income (Loss) Total
Balance at June 30, 201145,045,097
 $451
 $582,972
 $295,886
 1,144,610
 $(19,750) $7,144
 $866,703
Net income      79,225
       79,225
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax            (13,573) (13,573)
Change in deferred gains on cash flow hedging instruments, net of tax            842
 842
Change in unrealized loss on available for sale investment, net of tax            204
 204
Total comprehensive income              $66,698
Issuance of common stock pursuant to compensation plans1,110,815
 11
 16,124
         16,135
Stock based compensation income tax effects    8,811
         8,811
Shares withheld for payment of employee payroll taxes due on shares issued under stock based compensation plans        58,194
 (2,035)   (2,035)
Stock based compensation charge    8,290
         8,290
Balance at June 30, 201246,155,912
 $462
 $616,197
 $375,111
 1,202,804
 $(21,785) $(5,383) $964,602
 Common Stock Additional       
Accumulated
Other
  
   Amount Paid-in Retained Treasury Stock Comprehensive  
 Shares at $.01 Capital Earnings Shares Amount Income (Loss) Total
Balance at June 30, 2014103,143,018
 $1,031
 $969,182
 $629,618
 2,906,160
 $(40,092) $60,128
 $1,619,867
Net income
 
 
 167,896
 
 
 
 167,896
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 (102,534) (102,534)
Issuance of common stock pursuant to compensation plans1,967,728
 20
 26,065
 
 

 
 
 26,085
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions729,840
 7
 34,129
 
 
 
 
 34,136
Stock based compensation income tax effects
 
 32,098
 
 
 
 
 32,098
Shares withheld for payment of employee payroll taxes due on shares issued under stock based compensation plans
 
 
 
 323,182
 (18,058) 
 (18,058)
Stock based compensation charge
 
 12,197
 
 
 
 
 12,197
Balance at June 30, 2015105,840,586
 $1,058
 $1,073,671
 $797,514
 3,229,342
 $(58,150) $(42,406) $1,771,687


Note: The common stock and additional paid-in capital amounts and the treasury shares have been retroactively adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend. See notes to consolidated financial statements.


4457



THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 AND 20102013
(In thousands)
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES          
Net income$79,225
 $54,982
 $28,619
$167,896
 $139,851
 $114,656
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization30,459
 24,124
 18,772
56,587
 48,040
 40,095
Unrealized loss on available for sale investment
 
 1,210
Deferred income taxes1,642
 5,160
 4,046
(11,603) (1,350) (7,403)
Equity in net (income) loss of equity-method investees(1,140) 2,148
 1,739
Equity in net income of equity-method investees(489) (3,985) (295)
Stock based compensation8,290
 9,031
 6,979
12,197
 12,448
 13,010
Tax benefit from stock based compensation1,681
 2,525
 955
390
 1,339
 1,037
Contingent consideration expense/(reduction)(15,866) (4,177) 
Interest accretion on contingent consideration736
 1,691
 
Non-cash impairment charges relating to discontinued operations16,001
 
 
Contingent consideration expense280
 (3,026) 2,720
Loss on sale of business
 1,629
 4,200
Gains on pre-existing ownership interests in HPPC and Empire(8,256) 
 
Non-cash intangible asset impairment charge5,510
 
 
Other non-cash items, net599
 329
 771
(1,428) 1,175
 53
Increase (decrease) in cash attributable to changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of amounts applicable to acquisitions:          
Accounts receivable(4,316) (22,545) 4,593
(31,846) 967
 (47,751)
Inventories(5,597) (5,677) 5,856
(21,097) (22,775) (28,342)
Other current assets(1,556) 778
 4,719
7,699
 (7,948) (8,145)
Other assets and liabilities(5,200) (6,141) (3,267)(3,964) (5,540) (10,082)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses12,489
 4,459
 (15,225)13,606
 23,943
 47,209
Acquisition-related contingent consideration(850) (650) 
Income taxes5,363
 (7,379) 11,263
Net cash provided by operating activities121,960
 58,658
 71,030
185,482
 184,768
 120,962
     
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES          
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(257,264) (45,339) (51,415)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired and working capital settlements(104,633) (177,290) (350,426)
Proceeds from sale of business, net
 
 13,012
Purchases of property and equipment(20,427) (11,490) (11,428)(51,217) (41,611) (72,877)
Repayments from equity-method investees, net
 8,288
 3,110
Proceeds from sale of investment2,851
 4,377
 
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment93
 1,617
 85
1,699
 
 1,045
Repayments from (advances to) equity-method investees, net6,934
 (271) 
Net cash used in investing activities(270,664) (55,483) (62,758)(151,300) (206,236) (406,136)
     
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES          
Proceeds from exercises of stock options, net of related expenses14,179
 17,912
 2,139
Borrowings (repayments) under bank revolving credit facility, net160,989
 4,100
 (33,400)
Repayments of other long-term debt, net(460) (22) (88)
Acquisition-related contingent consideration(32,380) (14,750) 
Proceeds from exercises of stock options18,643
 7,320
 12,763
Borrowings under bank revolving credit facility, net48,951
 108,326
 263,458
Repayments of other debt, net(54,853) (7,228) 12,377
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation7,130
 2,115
 188
25,701
 14,226
 15,979
Acquisition related contingent consideration(3,217) (11,800) 
Shares withheld for payment of employee payroll taxes(2,035) (2,221) (1,220)(18,058) (10,023) (8,440)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities147,423
 7,134
 (32,381)
Net cash provided by financing activities17,167
 100,821
 296,137
     
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash3,659
 (58) (33)(8,178) 3,135
 405
     
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents2,378
 10,251
 (24,142)43,171
 82,488
 11,368
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period27,517
 17,266
 41,408
123,751
 41,263
 29,895
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$29,895
 $27,517
 $17,266
$166,922
 $123,751
 $41,263
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4558



THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.    BUSINESS

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company,” and herein referred to as “we,” “us,” and “our”“Company”) manufacture, market, distribute and sell naturalorganic and organicnatural products under brand names which are sold as “better-for-you” products. We areproducts, providing consumers with the opportunity to lead A Healthier Way of LifeTM. The Company is a leader in many organic and natural foodproducts categories, with such well-known foodmany recognized brands as Earth’s Bestin the various market categories they serve. The brand names include Almond Dream®, Arrowhead Mills®, Bearitos®, BluePrint®, Celestial Seasonings®, TerraCully & Sully®, Danival®, DeBoles®, Earth’s Best®, Ella’s Kitchen®, Empire®, Europe’s Best®, Farmhouse Fare®, Frank Cooper’s®, FreeBird®, Gale’s®, Garden of Eatin’®, Sensible PortionsGG UniqueFiberTM, Hain Pure Foods®, Rice Dream®, Soy Dream®, Almond Dream®, Imagine®, Westsoy®, The Greek Gods®, Ethnic Gourmet®, Rosetto®, Arrowhead Mills®, MaraNatha®, SunSpireHartley’s®, Health Valley®, Spectrum NaturalsImagine®, Spectrum EssentialsJohnson’s Juice Co.®, Joya®, Kosher Valley®, Lima®, Danival®, GG UniqueFiberTM, Yves Veggie Cuisine®, Europe’s Best®, DeBoles®, Linda McCartney® (under license), TheMaraNatha®, Natumi®, New Covent Garden Soup Co.®, Johnson’s Juice Co.Plainville Farms®, Farmhouse FareRice Dream®, Robertson’s®, Rudi’s Gluten-Free Bakery®, Rudi’s Organic Bakery®,Sensible Portions®, Spectrum®, Spectrum Essentials®, Soy Dream®, Sun-Pat®, SunSpire®, Terra®, The Greek Gods®, Tilda®, Walnut Acres®, WestSoy®and Cully & SullyYves Veggie Cuisine®. Our natural personal care products are marketed under the Alba Botanica®, Avalon Organics®, Alba BotanicaEarth’s Best®, JASON®, ZiaLive Clean®, and Queen Helene®, and Earth’s Best TenderCare® brands.
We have
The Company had a minority investment in Hain Pure Protein Corporation (“HPP” or “Hain Pure Protein”HPPC”), which through June 30, 2014. HPPC processes, markets and distributes antibiotic-free, chickenorganic and turkeyother poultry products. WeOn July 17, 2014, the Company acquired the remaining 51.3% of HPPC that it did not already own at which point HPPC became a wholly-owned subsidiary. Included in the acquisition was HPPC’s 19% interest in EK Holdings, Inc. (“Empire”), which grows, processes and sells kosher poultry and other products. On March 4, 2015, HPPC purchased the remaining 81% in Empire that it did not already own (see Note 4).

The Company also havehas an investment in a joint venture in Hong Kong with Hutchison China MeditechMediTech Ltd. (“Chi-Med”), a majority owned subsidiary of CK Hutchison WhampoaHoldings Limited, a company listed on the Alternative Investment Market, a sub-market of the LondonHong Kong Stock Exchange, to market and distribute co-branded infant and toddler feeding products and market and distribute selectedcertain of the Company’s brands in China and other markets.markets (see Note 14).
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we reorganized our reporting structure in a manner that resulted in a change to our operating and reportable segments. Our
The Company’s operations are now organized and managed by geography, and are comprised of fourin five operating segments: United States, United Kingdom, Hain Pure Protein, Canada and Europe. The Company previously operated in one segment. Refer to Note 17, Segment Information,18 for additional information and selected financial information for ourthe reportable segments.


2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

All amounts in ourthe consolidated financial statements, footnotes and tables have been rounded to the nearest thousand, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated.

Basis of Presentation
Our accompanying
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in affiliated companies in which the companyCompany exercises significant influence, but which it does not control, are accounted for in the accompanying consolidated financial statements under the equity method of accounting. As such, consolidated net income includes the Company’s equity in the current earnings or losses of such companies.
Prior period amounts related
On December 29, 2014, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split of its common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend to our discontinued operations (see Note 18)shareholders of record as of December 12, 2014. All share and earnings per share information have been reclassifiedretroactively adjusted to conformreflect the stock split and the incremental par value of the newly issued shares was recorded with the offset to the current year presentation.additional paid-in capital.

Use of Estimates

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.States (“U.S. GAAP”). The accounting principles we use require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods presented. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates, which are recorded in the period when they become known. We believe in the quality and reasonableness of our critical accounting policies;estimates; however, it is likely that materially different amounts wouldmight be reported under different conditions or using assumptions different from those that we have consistently applied.


59



Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers cash and cash equivalents to include cash in banks, commercial paper and deposits with financial institutions that can be liquidated without prior notice or penalty. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Valuation of Accounts and Chargebacks Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk
We perform ongoing
The Company routinely performs credit evaluations on existing and new customers daily. We applycustomers. The Company applies reserves for delinquent or uncollectible trade receivables based on a specific identification methodology and also applyapplies an additional reserve based on the experience we havethe Company has with ourits trade receivables aging categories. Credit losses have been within ourthe Company’s expectations in recent years. While one of ourthe Company’s customers represented approximately 20%9% and 16%10% of our trade receivables balances as of June 30, 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively, and a second customer represented approximately 8% and 11%10% of our trade receivable balances atas of June 30, 20122015 and 2011, we believe2014, respectively, the Company believes there is no significant or unusual credit exposure at this time.

46


Based on cash collection history and other statistical analysis, we estimatethe Company estimates the amount of unauthorized deductions our customers have taken that we expect to be repaid in the near future in the form ofand record a chargeback receivable. OurThe Company’s estimate of this receivable balance ($3,159($6,049 at June 30, 20122015 and $3,556$4,883 at June 30, 2011)2014) could be different had wethe Company used different assumptions and judgments.

During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, sales to one customer and its affiliates approximated 18%12%, 21%13% and 21%15% of consolidated net sales, respectively. Sales to a second customer and its affiliates approximated 10%, 11% and 10% during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

Inventory
Our inventory
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market, utilizing the first-in, first-out method. We provideThe Company provides write-downs for finished goods expected to become non-saleable due to age and specifically identify and provide for slow moving or obsolete raw ingredients and packaging.

Property, Plant and Equipment
Our property,
Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost and depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives or lease life, whichever is shorter. We believeThe Company believes the asset lives assigned to our property, plant and equipment are within ranges generally used in consumer products manufacturing and distribution businesses. OurThe Company’s manufacturing plants and distribution centers, and their related assets, are periodically reviewed to determine if anywhen impairment existsindicators are present by analyzing underlying cash flow projections. At this time, we believethe Company believes no impairment of the carrying value of such assets exists. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. We utilizeThe Company utilizes the following ranges of asset lives:
Buildings and improvements 10-5010 - 40 years
Machinery and equipment 3-203 - 20 years
Furniture and fixtures 3-153 - 15 years

Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the respective initial lease term or the estimated useful life of the assets, and generally range from 3 to 15 years.


60



Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level.level (for goodwill) or separate unit of accounting (for intangible assets with indefinite useful lives). The Company performs its test for impairment at the beginning of the fourth quarter of its fiscal year, and earlier if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicates impairment might exist. The Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. Otherwise, a two-step impairment test is performed. The impairment test for goodwill requires the Company to compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. The Company uses a blended analysis of a discounted cash flow model and a market valuation approach to determine the fair values of its reporting units. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company would then compare the carrying value of the goodwill to its implied fair value in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any.

Revenue Recognition

Sales are recognized when the earnings process is complete, which occurs when products are shipped in accordance with terms of agreements, title and risk of loss transfer to customers, collection is probable and pricing is fixed or determinable. Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are included in reported sales. Allowances for cash discounts are recorded in the period in which the related sale is recognized.

Sales and Promotion Incentives
We offer a variety of sales
Sales incentives and promotions includinginclude price discounts, slotting fees and coupons to our customers and to consumersare used to support sales of the Company'sCompany’s products. These incentives are deducted from our gross sales to determine reported net sales. The recognition of expense for these programs involves the use of judgment related to performance and redemption estimates. Differences between estimated expense and actual redemptions are normally insignificant and recognized as a change in estimate in the period such change occurs.

Trade Promotions. Accruals for trade promotions are recorded primarily at the time a product is sold to the customer based on expected levels of performance. Settlement of these liabilities typically occurs in subsequent periods primarily through an authorization process for deductions taken by a customer from amounts otherwise due to the Company.

Coupon Redemption. Coupon redemption costs are accrued in the period in which the coupons are offered, based on estimates of redemption rates that are developed by management. Management estimates are based on recommendations from independent coupon redemption clearing-houses as well as on historical information. Should actual redemption rates vary from amounts estimated, adjustments to accruals may be required.

47



ShippingIncluded in cost of sales are the cost of products sold, including the costs of raw materials and Handling Costs
We includelabor and overhead required to produce the products, warehousing, distribution, supply chain costs, as well as costs associated with shipping and handling of our inventory as a component of cost of sales.inventory.

Foreign Currency

The financial position and operating results of foreign operations are consolidated using the local currency as the functional currency. Financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using current rates for balance sheet accounts and average rates during each reporting period for revenues, costs and expenses. Net translation gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign financial statements and the effect of exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions of a long-term investment nature are accumulated and credited or charged directly to other comprehensive income, which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

The Company also recognizes gains and losses on transactions that are denominated in a currency other than the respective entity’s functional currency. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses also include amounts realized on the settlement of intercompany loans with foreign subsidiaries that are of a short-term investment nature.

61



Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Included in selling, general and administrative expenses are advertising, promotion costs not paid directly to the Company’s customers, salary and related benefit costs of the Company’s employees in the finance, human resources, information technology, legal, sales and marketing functions, facility related costs of the Company’s administrative functions, and costs paid to consultants and third party providers for related services.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Research and development costs amounted to $3,906$10,271 in fiscal 2012, $3,5042015, $10,049 in fiscal 20112014 and $2,453$7,516 in fiscal year 2010. Our2013. The Company’s research and development expenditures do not include the expenditures on such activities undertaken by co-packers and suppliers who develop numerous products based on ideas we generatethe Company generates and on their own initiative with the expectation that wethe Company will accept their new product ideas and market them under ourthe Company’s brands. These efforts by co-packers and suppliers have resulted in a substantial number of our new product introductions. We areThe Company is unable to estimate the amount of expenditures made by co-packers and suppliers on research and development; however, we believethe Company believes such activities and expenditures are important to ourits continuing ability to introduce new products.

Advertising Costs
Media advertising
Advertising costs, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses, amounted to $9,054$20,868 in fiscal 2012, $6,6642015, $15,643 in fiscal 20112014 and $5,264$14,030 in fiscal year 2010.2013. Such costs are expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes
We follow
The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities at enacted rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided for deferred tax assets to the extent it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be recoverable against future taxable income.
We recognize
The Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process prescribed by the authoritative guidance. The first step requires usthe Company to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that the tax position has met the threshold for recognition; therefore, wethe Company must evaluate whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. The second step requires usthe Company to measure the tax benefit of the tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in an income tax return as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We reevaluateThe Company reevaluates the uncertain tax positions each quarterperiod based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new audit activity. Depending on the jurisdiction, such a change in recognition or measurement may result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision in the period. We recordThe Company records interest and penalties in ourthe provision for income taxes.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. At June 30, 20122015 and 2011, we2014, the Company had $300$45,101 and $7,300$31,902 invested in corporate money market securities, including commercial paper, repurchase agreements, variable rate instruments and bank instruments. These securitieswhich are classified as cash equivalents as their maturities when purchased are less than three months.equivalents. At June 30, 20122015 and 2011,2014, the carrying values of financial instruments such as accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, andas well as borrowings under our credit facility and other borrowings, approximate fair value based upon either the short maturities or variable interest rates of these instruments.

Derivative Instruments

The Company utilizes derivative instruments, principally foreign exchange forward contracts, to manage certain exposures to changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company’s contracts are hedges for transactions with notional balances and periods consistent with the related exposures and do not constitute investments independent of these exposures. These contracts, which are designated and documented as cash flow hedges, qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Exposure to counterparty credit risk is considered low because these agreements have been entered into with high quality financial institutions.


4862



All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment are recognized in stockholders’ equity until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge treatment, as well as the ineffective portion of any hedges, are recognized currently in earnings.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company has employee and director stock based compensation plans. The fair value of employee stock options is determined on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company has used historical volatility in its estimate of expected volatility. The expected life represents the period of time (in years) for which the options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve. RestrictedThe fair value of restricted stock awards are valued atis equal to the market value of ourthe Company’s common stock on the date of grant.grant, or is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation if the award contains a market condition.

The fair value of stock based compensation awards is recognized in expense over the vesting period of the award, using the straight-line method. For awards that contain a market condition, expense is recognized over the derived service period using an accelerated recognition method. For restricted stock awards which include performance criteria, compensation expense is recorded when the achievement of the performance criteria is probable and is recognized over the performance and vesting service periods. Compensation expense is recognized for only that portion of stock based awards that are expected to vest. Therefore, we apply estimated forfeiture rates that are derived from historical employee termination activity are applied to reduce the amount of compensation expense recognized. If the actual forfeitures differ from the estimate, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.

The Company receives an income tax deduction in certain tax jurisdictions for restricted stock grants when they vest and for stock options exercised by employees equal to the excess of the market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the option price. Excess tax benefits (tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized) are classified as a cash flow provided by financing activities in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
We
The Company periodically evaluateevaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets, to be held and used in the business, other than goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, held and used in the business when events and circumstances occur indicating that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment test is recognizedperformed when the estimated undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset or group of assets is less than their carrying value. If the carrying value of a long-lived assetOnce such impairment test is considered impaired,performed, a loss is recognized based on the amount, if any, by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value for assets to be held and used.

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs associated with obtaining debt financing are capitalized and amortized over the related term of the applicable debt instruments on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method.

Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2014, the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we adopted new accounting guidance included inFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-29, 2014-08,Disclosure Presentation of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business CombinationsFinancial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this standard specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This standard also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we adopted new accounting guidance included in ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this standard generally represent clarification of Topic 820, but also include instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. This update results in common principles and2014-08 amends the requirements for measuring fair valuereporting and disclosing discontinued operations. Under ASU No. 2014-08, a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s operations and financial results. ASU No. 2014-08 is effective for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordanceinterim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, with U.S. GAAPearly adoption permitted and International Financial Reporting Standards.is to be applied prospectively. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, weCompany has elected to early adopt the new accounting guidance included inprovisions of ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):Testing Goodwill for Impairment, and ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. ASU No. 2011-08 permits entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that2014-08 at the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test included in U.S. GAAP. Similarly, ASU No. 2012-02 permits entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-

49


lived intangible asset is impaired. Entities are not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless they determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount, nor are they required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless they determine that it is more likely than not that such asset is impaired. We applied this guidance to our fiscal 2012 annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment testing conducted during the fourth quarterbeginning of fiscal 2012. We determined that it was not necessary for two of our reporting units to apply the traditional two-step quantitative impairment test in ASC 350 based on qualitative information that it is more likely than not that the fair value of those reporting units exceeded their carrying values.2015. The adoption of this standard did not havethe new guidance may impact the reporting and disclosure of any impact on our consolidated financial statements.future disposals we complete.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Effective

In June 2011,July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05,2015-11, Comprehensive IncomeInventory (Topic 220)330): PresentationSimplifying the Measurement of Comprehensive Income,Inventory which. ASU 2015-11 requires thatinventory measured using any method other than last-in, first out or the componentsretail inventory method to be subsequently measured at the lower of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) be presented in onecost or net realizable value, rather than at the lower of two formats: either (i) together with net income in a continuous statementcost or market. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and for interim periods within such annual period. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effects of comprehensive income or (ii) in a second statementadopting the provisions of comprehensive income to immediately follow the income statement. The ASU eliminates an existing option to present the componentsNo. 2015-11.

63




In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12,2015-03, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments toSimplifying the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05Debt Issuance Costs, which indefinitely defers the requirements. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-052015-03 require that debt issuance costs related to present reclassification adjustments outa recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of accumulated OCIthat debt liability. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by component in both the statement in which net incomeamendments. ASU No. 2015-03 must be applied retrospectively and is presented and the statement in which OCI is presented. During the deferral period, the existing requirements in U.S. GAAP for the presentation of reclassification adjustments must continue to be followed. These standards are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. In August 2015, the Company's first quarterFASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest - Imputation of fiscal year 2013.Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. ASU No. 2015-15 states that for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting such costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company intends to early adopt this new guidance will require changingon July 1, 2015 (beginning of fiscal 2016).

In June 2014, the Company's presentationFASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. ASU No. 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. ASU No. 2014-12 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and for interim periods within such annual period, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effects of adopting the provisions of ASU No. 2014-12.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU No. 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. Additionally, ASU No. 2014-09 supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition-Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. Under ASU No. 2014-09, an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  ASU No. 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of comprehensive income, but theserevenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in presentationjudgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.  ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods within such annual period, with early application permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU No. 2014-09 allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption. The Company is evaluating the transition method that will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.be elected and the potential effects of adopting the provisions of ASU No. 2014-09.



64



3.    EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Numerator:          
Income from continuing operations$94,214
 $58,971
 $38,191
$167,896
 $141,480
 $119,793
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax(14,989) (3,989) (9,572)
Discontinued operations
 (1,629) (5,137)
Net income$79,225
 $54,982
 $28,619
$167,896
 $139,851
 $114,656
          
Denominator (in thousands):          
Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares outstanding during the period44,360
 43,165
 40,890
101,703
 97,750
 92,352
Effect of dilutive stock options, unvested restricted stock and unvested restricted share units1,487
 1,372
 624
1,718
 2,256
 2,792
Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions45,847
 44,537
 41,514
103,421
 100,006
 95,144
          
Basic net income per common share:

 

 



 

  
From continuing operations$2.12
 $1.37
 $0.93
$1.65
 $1.45
 $1.30
From discontinued operations(0.33) (0.10) (0.23)
 (0.02) (0.06)
Net income per common share - basic$1.79
 $1.27
 $0.70
$1.65
 $1.43
 $1.24
          
Diluted net income per common share:          
From continuing operations$2.05
 $1.32
 $0.92
$1.62
 $1.42
 $1.26
From discontinued operations(0.32) (0.09) (0.23)
 (0.02) (0.05)
Net income per common share - diluted$1.73
 $1.23
 $0.69
$1.62
 $1.40
 $1.21


50

TableNote: On December 29, 2014, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split of Contentsits common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend to shareholders of record as of December 12, 2014. All share and per share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.


Basic earnings per share excludes the dilutive effects of stock options, unvested restricted stock and unvested restricted share units. Diluted earnings per share includes only the dilutive effects of common stock equivalents such as stock options and unvested restricted stock awards. The Company used income from continuing operations as the control number in determining whether potential common shares were dilutive or anti-dilutive. The same number of potential common shares used in computing the diluted per share amount from continuing operations was also used in computing the diluted per share amounts from discontinued operations even if those amounts were anti-dilutive.

Anti-dilutive stock options and restrictedRestricted stock awards totaling 29,000, 624,000106,800, 135,905 and 2,442,000300,000 were excluded from our diluted earnings per share calculations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively, were excluded from our earnings per share calculations.as such awards are contingently issuable based on market or performance conditions and such conditions had not been achieved during the respective periods.



65



4.    ACQUISITIONS
We account
The Company accounts for acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting. The results of operations of the acquisitions typically have been included in ourthe consolidated results from their respective dates of acquisition. We allocate theThe purchase price of each acquisition is allocated to the tangible assets, liabilities, and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. Acquisitions may include contingent consideration, the fair value of which is estimated on the acquisition date as the present value of the expected contingent payments, determined using weighted probabilities of possible payments. The fair values assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired were determined primarily by using an income approach which was based on assumptions and estimates made by management. Significant assumptions utilized in the income approach were based on company specific information and projections which are not observable in the market and are thus considered Level 3 measurements as defined by authoritative guidance. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identified assets and liabilities has been recorded as goodwill.

The costs related to all acquisitions have been expensed as incurred and are included in “Acquisition related expenses, restructuring and restructuring charges”integration charges, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Acquisition-related costs of $5,921, $3,548,$5,731, $7,238, and $2,692$5,461 were expensed in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively. DuringThe expenses incurred during fiscal 2015 primarily relate to professional fees, severance charges and other transaction related costs associated with the three acquisitions completed in the current fiscal years endedyear. The expenses incurred during fiscal 2014 primarily relate to professional fees and stamp duty associated with the acquisition of Tilda and during fiscal 2013 primarily related to professional fees associated with the acquisition of the UK Ambient Grocery Brands and BluePrint (as discussed below).

Fiscal 2015

On July 17, 2014, the Company acquired the remaining 51.3% of HPPC that it did not already own, at which point HPPC became a wholly-owned subsidiary. HPPC processes, markets and distributes antibiotic-free, organic and other poultry products. HPPC held a 19% interest in Empire, which grows, processes and sells kosher poultry and other products. Consideration in the transaction consisted of cash totaling $20,310 and 462,856 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $19,690. The cash consideration paid was funded with existing cash balances. Additionally, HPPC’s existing bank borrowings were repaid on September 30, 2014 with proceeds from borrowings under the Credit Agreement (see Note 10). The carrying amount of the pre-existing 48.7% investment in HPPC as of June 30, 20122014 was $30,740. Due to the acquisition of the remaining 51.3% of HPPC, the Company adjusted the carrying amount of its pre-existing investment to its fair value. This resulted in a gain of $5,334 recorded in “Interest and 2011, these costs were offset by net reversalsother expenses, net” in the Consolidated Statements of $14,627 and $4,177 of contingent consideration (See Note 14).Income.
Fiscal 2012
On April 27, 2012, weFebruary 20, 2015, the Company acquired Cully & Sully Limited ("Cully & Sully")Belvedere International, Inc., (“Belvedere”) a marketer of branded natural chilled soups, savory piesleader in health and hot pots in Ireland, for beauty care products including the Live Clean€10,460® brand with approximately 200 baby, body and hair care products as well as several mass market brands sold primarily in Canada and manufactured in a company facility in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. Consideration in the transaction consisted of cash net (approximately $13,835totaling C$17,454 ($13,988 at the transaction date exchange rate), which included debt that was repaid at closing, and was funded with existing cash balances. Additionally, contingent consideration of up to €4,500 (approximately $5,952 at the transaction date exchange rate)a maximum of C$4,000 is payable based uponon the achievement of specified operating results during the period through June 30, 2014. The acquisition, whichtwo consecutive one-year periods following the closing date. Belvedere is part of our United Kingdom operating segment, provides us entry into the Irish marketplace and complements our existing United Kingdom product offerings. The acquisition was funded with existing cash balances. The amounts of net sales and income before income taxes from the Cully & Sully acquisition included in our results since the acquisition date were not significant.
On October 25, 2011, we acquired Daniels in the United Kingdom, for £146,532 in cash, net (approximately $233,822 at the transaction date exchange rate), and up to £13,000 (approximately $20,500 at the transaction date exchange rate) of contingent consideration based upon the achievement of specifiedCanada operating results during the twelve month periods ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2013. The transaction date fair value of the contingent consideration ($15,637) was subsequently reversed with a corresponding reduction of expense in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 (see Note 14). The acquisition was funded with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Daniels is a leading marketer and manufacturer of natural chilled foods, including three leading brands – The New Covent Garden Soup Co.®, Johnson’s Juice Co.® and Farmhouse Fare®. Daniels also offers fresh prepared fruit products and chilled ready meals. Daniels’ product offerings are sold at all major supermarkets and select foodservice outlets throughout the United Kingdom. We believe the acquisition of Daniels extended our presence into one of the fastest-growing healthy food segments in the United Kingdom and provided a platform for the growth of our combined operations. We also believe the acquisition provides us with the scale in our international operations to allow us to introduce some of our existing brands in the marketplace in a more meaningful way. During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company decided to sell the Daniels private label chilled ready meals operations. Refer to Note 18, Discontinued Operations, for additional information. Since the date of acquisition, Daniels netsegment. Net sales and income before income taxes from continuing operations of $144,290attributable to the Belvedere acquisition and$12,999, respectively, were included in the Consolidated Statement of Income forour consolidated results were not material in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.2015.

On October 5, 2011 weMarch 4, 2015, the Company acquired the assets and businessremaining 81% of Empire that it did not already own, at which point Empire became a wholly-owned subsidiary. Consideration in the transaction consisted of cash totaling $57,595 (net of cash acquired) which included debt that was repaid at closing. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under the Credit Agreement. The carrying amount of the Europe’s Best® brandpre-existing 19% investment in Empire as of all natural frozen fruitMarch 4, 2015 was $6,864. Due to the acquisition of the remaining 81% of Empire, the Company adjusted the carrying amount of its pre-existing investment to its fair value. This resulted in a gain of $2,922 recorded in “Interest and vegetable products through our wholly-owned Hain Celestial Canada subsidiary for $9,513other expenses, net” in cash. The Europe’s Best product line includes premium fruit and vegetable products distributed in Canada. The acquisition provided us entry into a new category and is expected to complement our existing product offerings. The amountsthe Consolidated Statements of netIncome. Net sales and income before income taxes from continuing operations attributable to the Europe’s BestEmpire acquisition and included in our consolidated results since the acquisition date were not significant.material in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

5166



The following table summarizes the components of the preliminary purchase price allocations for the fiscal 20122015 acquisitions:
Daniels 
Europe’s
Best
 Cully & Sully TotalHPPC Belvedere Empire Total
Purchase price:       
Carrying value of pre-existing interest, after fair value adjustments:$36,074
 $
 $9,786
 $45,860
Purchase Price:       
Cash paid$233,822
 $9,513
 $13,835
 $257,170
20,310
 13,988
 57,595
 91,893
Equity issued19,690
 
 
 19,690
Fair value of contingent consideration15,637
 
 3,363
 19,000

 1,603
 
 1,603
$249,459
 $9,513
 $17,198
 $276,170
Total investment:$76,074
 $15,591
 $67,381
 $159,046
Allocation:              
Current assets$55,639
 $7,157
 $1,549
 $64,345
$52,055
 $10,042
 $19,628
 $81,725
Property, plant and equipment46,799
 
 35
 46,834
21,864
 2,598
 13,094
 37,556
Other assets7,288
 
 
 7,288
Identifiable intangible assets103,529
 2,706
 11,693
 117,928
20,700
 5,698
 33,890
 60,288
Other non-current assets, net1,108
 
 
 1,108
Deferred taxes1,388
 (3,890) (14,443) (16,945)
Assumed liabilities(46,431) (184) (1,342) (47,957)(41,705) (1,784) (15,632) (59,121)
Deferred income taxes(27,942) (166) (1,462) (29,570)
Goodwill116,757
 
 6,725
 123,482
14,484
 2,927
 30,844
 48,255
$249,459
 $9,513
 $17,198
 $276,170
$76,074
 $15,591
 $67,381
 $159,046

The purchase price allocations are based upon preliminary valuations, and the Company’s estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period as valuations are finalized. Any change in the estimated fair value of the net assets, prior to the finalization of the more detailed analyses, but not to exceed one year from the dates of acquisition, will change the amount of the purchase price allocations.

The preliminary fair values assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired were based on assumptions and estimates made by management. Identifiable intangible assets acquired consisted of customer relationships initially valued at $59,602 with a weighted average estimated useful life of 11.0 years, a non-compete arrangement initially valued at $820$14,621 with an estimated useful life of 310.8 years, and trade names initially valued at $57,506$45,667 with indefinite lives. The goodwill represents the future economic benefits expected to arise that could not be individually identified and separately recognized, including use of ourthe Company’s existing infrastructure to expand sales of the acquired business'business’ products. The goodwill recorded as a result of the Daniels and Cully & Sullythese acquisitions is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Fiscal 2011
On February 4, 2011, we acquired Danival SAS, a manufacturer of certified organic food products based in France, for cash consideration of €18,083 ($24,741 based on the transaction date exchange rate). Danival’s product line included over 200 branded organic sweet and salted grocery, fruits, vegetables and delicatessen products currently distributed in Europe. The Danival acquisition complements the organic food line of our Lima brand in Europe. Identifiable intangible assets acquired consisted of customer relationships, recipes and the trade name. The trade name intangible relates to the “Danival” brand name, which has an indefinite life, and therefore, is not amortized. The customer relationship and recipes intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The goodwill recorded of $9,142 represented the future economic benefits expected to arise that could not be individually identified and separately recognized and is not deductible for tax purposes.
On January 28, 2011, we acquired GG UniqueFiber AS, a manufacturer of all natural high fiber crackers based in Norway that distributed its products through independent distributors in the United States and Europe. The acquisition broadened our offerings of whole grain and high fiber products. The acquisition of GG UniqueFiber was completed for cash consideration of Norwegian kroner (“NOK”) 25,000 ($4,281 based on the transaction date exchange rate) plus up to NOK 25,000 ($4,281) of additional contingent consideration based upon the achievement of specified operating results, of which the Company recorded NOK 17,600 ($3,050) as the fair value at the acquisition date. The goodwill recorded of $4,893 represents the future economic benefits expected to arise that could not be individually identified and separately recognized and is not deductible for tax purposes.
On July 2, 2010, we acquired substantially all of the assets and business, including The Greek Gods brand of greek-style yogurt products, and assumed certain liabilities of 3 Greek Gods, LLC (“Greek Gods”). Greek Gods develops, produces and markets The Greek Gods brand of greek-style yogurt products into various sales channels. The acquisition of The Greek Gods brand expanded our refrigerated product offerings. The acquisition was completed for initial cash consideration of $16,277, and 242,185 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $4,785, plus additional contingent consideration based upon the achievement of specified operating results in fiscal 2011 and 2012. The Company paid $15,400 of contingent consideration during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, representing payment for the achievement of the first year’s operating results and paid the remaining $9,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company recorded $22,900 as the fair value of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date and the additional payments totaling $1,500 were recorded in the Consolidated Statements

52


of Income in periods subsequent to the acquisition. Identifiable intangible assets acquired consisted of customer relationships and the trade name. The trade name intangible relates to “The Greek Gods” brand name, which has an indefinite life, and therefore, is not amortized. The customer relationship intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. The goodwill recorded of $23,686 represents the future economic benefits expected to arise that could not be individually identified and separately recognized, including entry into the greek-style yogurt category and use of our existing infrastructure to expand sales of the acquired business products and is deductible for tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the components of the purchase price allocations for the fiscal 2011 acquisitions:
 Greek Gods 
GG
UniqueFiber
 Danival Total
Purchase price:       
Cash paid$16,277
 $4,281
 $24,741
 $45,299
Equity issued4,785
 
 
 4,785
Fair value of contingent consideration22,900
 3,050
 
 25,950
 $43,962
 $7,331
 $24,741
 $76,034
Allocation:       
Current assets$2,172
 $429
 $7,320
 $9,921
Property, plant and equipment
 673
 3,049
 3,722
Identifiable intangible assets18,800
 2,116
 12,587
 33,503
Assumed liabilities(696) (527) (5,239) (6,462)
Deferred income taxes
 (253) (2,118) (2,371)
Goodwill23,686
 4,893
 9,142
 37,721
 $43,962
 $7,331
 $24,741
 $76,034


Fiscal 2010
On June 15, 2010, we acquired substantially all of the assets and business, including the Sensible Portions brand snack products, and assumed certain liabilities, of World Gourmet Marketing, L.L.C. (“World Gourmet”). World Gourmet developed, produced, marketed and sold Sensible Portions branded Garden Veggie Straws, Potato Straws, Apple Straws, Pita Bites and other snack products into various sales channels and developed significant strength in the club store channel. The acquisition of the Sensible Portions brand expanded our snack product offerings as well as sales opportunities for our other products in the club store channel. The terms included initial cash consideration of $50,914, and 1,558,442 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $35,392, plus up to $30,000 of additional contingent consideration based upon the achievement of specified operating results in fiscal 2011. The Company paid $23,660 of contingent consideration during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The Company recorded $26,600 as the fair value of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date and recorded a net decrease in that liability of $2,940, which resulted in income recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income in periods subsequent to the acquisition.
The following table summarizes the components of the purchase price allocation for the World Gourmet acquisition:
Purchase price: 
Cash paid$50,914
Equity issued35,392
Fair value of contingent consideration26,600
 $112,906
Allocation: 
Current assets$10,114
Property, plant and equipment7,212
Identifiable intangible assets43,000
Other liabilities, net(8,777)
Goodwill61,357
 $112,906

53


Identifiable intangible assets include customer relationships and trade names. The trade name intangible relates to the “Sensible Portions” brand name, which has an indefinite life, and therefore, is not amortized. The customer relationship intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. The goodwill of $61,357 represents the future economic benefits expected to arise that could not be individually identified and separately recognized, including expansion of the Company’s sales into the club store channel, an increased presence in the snack category and use of our existing infrastructure to expand sales of the acquired business products. The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

Unaudited Proforma Results of Continuing Operations
The following table provides unaudited pro forma results of continuing operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015 and 2010,2014, as if all ofonly the above acquisitions completed in fiscal 2015 (HPPC, Belvedere and Empire) had been completed at the beginning of fiscal year 2010.2014. The following pro forma combined results of continuing operations haveinformation has been provided for illustrative purposes only, and dodoes not purport to be indicative of the actual results that would have been achieved by the Company for the periods presented or that will be achieved by the combined company in the future. The pro forma information has been adjusted to give effect to items that are directly attributable to the transactions and are expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The adjustmentsresults, which include amortization expense associated with acquired identifiable intangible assets interest expense associated with bank borrowings to fundand the acquisitions and eliminationimpact of transactions costs incurred that are directly relatedreversing our previously recorded equity in HPPC’s net income as prior to the transactions and do not have a continuing impact on operating results from continuing operations.date of acquisition, HPPC was accounted for under the equity-method of accounting.

Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014
Net sales from continuing operations$1,451,658
 $1,357,781
 $1,211,601
$2,797,368
 $2,558,173
Net income from continuing operations$85,094
 $65,311
 $50,993
$171,130
 $148,215
Net income per common share from continuing operations - diluted$1.86
 $1.47
 $1.23
$1.65
 $1.48
This information has not been adjusted to reflect any changes


67



Fiscal 2014

On April 28, 2014, the Company acquired Charter Baking Company, Inc. and its subsidiary Rudi’s Organic Bakery, Inc. (“Rudi’s”), a leading organic and gluten-free company with facilities in Boulder, Colorado. Under the Rudi’s Organic Bakery® and Rudi’s Gluten-Free Bakery brands, Rudi’s offers a range of approximately 60 products including USDA certified organic breads, buns, bagels, tortillas, wraps and soft pretzels and various gluten-free products including breads, buns, pizza crusts, tortillas, snack bars and stuffing in the operationsUnited States and Canada. Consideration in the transaction consisted of cash totaling $50,807 (which is net of cash acquired) and 267,488 shares of the businesses subsequentCompany’s common stock valued at $11,168. The cash consideration paid was funded with borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

On January 13, 2014, the Company acquired Tilda Limited (“Tilda”), a leading premium 100% branded Basmati and specialty rice products company. Tilda offers a range of over 60 dry rice and ready-to-heat branded products under the Tilda® brand and other names to theirconsumers in over 40 countries, principally in the United Kingdom, the Middle East and North Africa, Continental Europe, North America and India. On June 18, 2014, the Company also completed the acquisition of certain assets of Tilda Riceland Limited in India. Consideration in these transactions consisted of cash totaling $123,822 (which is net of cash acquired and based on the exchange rates in effect at the respective transaction dates), 3,292,346 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $148,353 and deferred consideration (the “Vendor Loan Note”) for £20,000 ($32,958 at the transaction date exchange rate) issued by us. Changesthe Company and payable within one year following completion of the acquisition, with a portion being payable in operationsCompany shares at the Company’s option. On January 13, 2015, the Company paid £10,000 ($15,114 at the transaction date exchange rate and which was funded with existing cash balances) and issued 266,984 shares of the Company’s common stock in full repayment of this obligation. As a result, the Company recorded a realized foreign currency gain of $3,397 which represents the change in foreign currency rates from the acquisition date through the repayment date. The cash consideration paid for the initial purchase price was funded with borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

The following table summarizes the components of the purchase price allocations for the fiscal 2014 acquisitions:
 Tilda Rudi’s Total
Purchase price:     
Cash paid$123,822
 $50,807
 $174,629
Equity issued148,353
 11,168
 159,521
Vendor Loan Note32,958
 
 32,958
 $305,133
 $61,975
 $367,108
Allocation:     
Current assets$86,828
 $8,058
 $94,886
Property, plant and equipment39,806
 3,774
 43,580
Identifiable intangible assets124,549
 27,514
 152,063
Assumed liabilities(93,742) (6,319) (100,061)
Deferred income taxes(26,230) 1,932
 (24,298)
Goodwill173,922
 27,016
 200,938
 $305,133
 $61,975
 $367,108

The fair values assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired were based on assumptions and estimates made by management. Identifiable intangible assets acquired consist principally of customer relationships valued at $41,976 with a weighted average estimated useful life of 13.2 years and trade names valued at $110,087 with indefinite lives. The goodwill represents the future economic benefits expected to arise that could not be individually identified and separately recognized, including use of the Company’s existing infrastructure to expand sales of the acquired businesses include, but are not limited to, discontinuation of products, integration of systems and personnel, changes in trade practices, application of our credit policies, changes in manufacturing processes or locations, and changes in marketing and advertising programs. Had any of these changes been implemented by the former managementsbusiness’ products. The goodwill recorded as a result of the businesses acquired prioracquisitions is not expected to acquisition by us, the net sales and net income information might have been materially different than the actual results achieved and from the pro forma information provided. In management’s opinion, thesebe deductible for tax purposes.


68



The following table provides unaudited pro forma results of continuing operations arefor the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, as if only the acquisitions completed in fiscal 2014 (Rudi’s and Tilda) had been completed at the beginning of fiscal year 2013. The information has been provided for illustrative purposes only, and does not intended to represent orpurport to be indicative of the actual results that would have occurred hadbeen achieved by the acquisitions been consummated at the beginning ofCompany for the periods presented or that will be achieved by the combined company in the future. The pro forma information has been adjusted to give effect to items that are directly attributable to the transactions and are expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results, which include amortization expense associated with acquired identifiable intangible assets and interest expense associated with bank borrowings to fund the acquisitions.

 Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
 2014 2013
Net sales from continuing operations$2,310,540
 $1,970,371
Net income from continuing operations$151,534
 $139,085
Net income per common share from continuing operations - diluted$1.49
 $1.41

Fiscal 2013

On May 2, 2013, the Company acquired Ella’s Kitchen Group Limited (“Ella’s Kitchen”), a manufacturer and distributor of premium organic baby food under the Ella’s Kitchen® brand and the first company to offer baby food in convenient flexible pouches. Ella’s Kitchen offers a range of branded organic baby food products principally in the United Kingdom, the United States and Scandinavia. Ella’s Kitchen’s operations are included as part of the Company’s United States operating segment. Consideration in the transaction consisted of cash totaling £37,571, net of cash acquired (approximately $58,437 at the transaction date exchange rate) and 1,375,558 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $45,050. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under our Credit Agreement. The amounts of net sales and income before income taxes from continuing operations attributable to the Ella’s Kitchen acquisition and included in our consolidated results were not material in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

On December 21, 2012, the Company acquired the assets and business of Zoe SakoutisLLC, d/b/a BluePrint Cleanse (“BluePrint”), a nationally recognized leader in the cold-pressed juice category based in New York City, for $16,679 in cash and 348,534 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $9,525. Additionally, contingent consideration was payable based upon the achievement of specified operating results during the two annual periods ending December 31, 2013 and 2014. The Company recorded $13,491 as the fair value of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company paid $11,800 in settlement of the contingent consideration obligation with the sellers (see note 15). The BluePrint® brand, which is part of our United States operating segment, expanded our product offerings into a new category. The acquisition was funded with existing cash balances and borrowings under our Credit Agreement. The amounts of net sales and income before income taxes from continuing operations attributable to the BluePrint acquisition and included in our consolidated results were not material in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

On November 1, 2012, the Company completed the disposal of our sandwich business, including the Daily BreadTM brand name, in the United Kingdom. The disposal transaction resulted in an exchange of businesses, whereby the Company acquired the fresh prepared fruit products business of Superior Food Limited in the United Kingdom in exchange for the Company’s sandwich business and a cash payment of £1,000 (approximately $1,600 at the transaction date exchange rate).

On October 27, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of a portfolio of market-leading packaged grocery brands including Hartley’s®, Sun-Pat®, Gale’s®, Robertson’s® and Frank Cooper’s®, together with the manufacturing facility in Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom (the “UK Ambient Grocery Brands”) from Premier Foods plc. The product offerings acquired include jams, fruit spreads, jellies, nut butters, honey and marmalade products. Consideration in the transaction consisted of £169,708 in cash (approximately $273,246 at the transaction date exchange rate) funded with borrowings under our Credit Agreement and 1,672,852 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $48,061. Since the date of acquisition, net sales of $161,784 and income before income taxes from continuing operations of $19,873 were included in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. These results for the UK Ambient Grocery Brands since the date of acquisition on October 27, 2012 through the end of fiscal 2013 did not include all of the selling, general and administrative expenses required to properly support the future operations of the combined companies underacquired business as these brands were acquired without such functions and the build of the required infrastructure and integration activities was ongoing.

On August 20, 2012, the Company completed the sale of its private-label chilled ready meals business in the United Kingdom (the “CRM business”). Total consideration received was £9,641 (approximately $15,132 at the transaction date exchange rate). A preliminary loss on disposal was recognized of $3,616 ($4,200 after-tax, which includes the write-off of certain deferred tax

69



assets) in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, and a subsequent gain of $1,148 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 related to the finalization of the working capital adjustment with the purchaser. These amounts are included within “Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table summarizes the components of the purchase price allocations for the fiscal 2013 acquisitions:
 UK Ambient Grocery Brands BluePrint Ella’s Kitchen Total
Purchase price:       
Cash paid$273,246
 $16,679
 $58,437
 $348,362
Equity issued48,061
 9,525
 45,050
 102,636
Fair value of contingent consideration
 13,491
 
 13,491
 $321,307
 $39,695
 $103,487
 $464,489
Allocation:       
Current assets$29,825
 $2,742
 $27,749
 $60,316
Property, plant and equipment39,150
 3,173
 672
 42,995
Identifiable intangible assets118,020
 18,980
 49,669
 186,669
Assumed liabilities(2,693) (2,189) (15,064) (19,946)
Deferred income taxes2,882
 
 (11,789) (8,907)
Goodwill134,123
 16,989
 52,250
 203,362
 $321,307
 $39,695
 $103,487
 $464,489

The fair values assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired were based on assumptions and estimates made by management. Identifiable intangible assets acquired consisted of customer relationships valued at $46,232 with a weighted average estimated useful life of 15.6 years, a non-compete arrangement valued at $1,100 with an estimated life of 3.0 years, and trade names valued at $139,337 with indefinite lives. The goodwill represents the future economic benefits expected to arise that could not be individually identified and separately recognized, including use of our management.existing infrastructure to expand sales of the acquired business’ products. The goodwill recorded as a result of the acquisitions of the UK Ambient Grocery Brands and Ella’s Kitchen is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

5.    DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On February 6, 2014, the Company completed the sale of the Grains Noirs business in Europe. As result of the sale, a loss on disposal of $2,777 was recorded during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. The operating results of Grains Noirs were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company recorded a gain of $1,148 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 related to the finalization of a working capital adjustment on the sale of the CRM business in the United Kingdom, which was completed in fiscal 2013.

Summarized results of our discontinued operations are as follows. There were no amounts recorded in discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2014 2013
Net sales$
 $15,313
Operating loss$
 $(1,176)
Loss on sale of business, net of tax$(1,629) $(4,200)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax$(1,629) $(5,137)



70



6.    INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:
June 30,
2012
 June 30,
2011
June 30,
2015
 June 30,
2014
Finished goods$118,538
 $113,047
$240,004
 $190,818
Raw materials, work-in-progress and packaging67,902
 57,692
142,207
 129,433
$186,440
 $170,739
$382,211
 $320,251


6.7.    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

54


June 30,
2012
 June 30,
2011
June 30,
2015
 June 30,
2014
Land$10,905
 $9,157
$36,386
 $34,021
Buildings and improvements47,640
 41,779
88,507
 75,895
Machinery and equipment195,392
 156,739
359,183
 329,680
Furniture and fixtures7,846
 8,230
10,272
 10,352
Leasehold improvements7,363
 1,934
19,257
 21,836
Construction in progress4,916
 6,382
11,444
 4,850
274,062
 224,221
525,049
 476,634
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization125,587
 113,798
180,787
 165,973
$148,475
 $110,423
$344,262
 $310,661


7.8.    GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
 US United Kingdom Rest of World Total
Balance as of June 30, 2010$460,623
 $
 $54,543
 $515,166
Acquisition activity30,806
 
 14,035
 44,841
Translation and other adjustments, net
 
 5,872
 5,872
Balance as of June 30, 2011$491,429
 $
 $74,450
 $565,879
Acquisition activity
 123,482
 
 123,482
Other adjustments20,688
 
 
 20,688
Translation and other adjustments, net
 (2,882) (4,611) (7,493)
Balance as of June 30, 2012$512,117
 $120,600
 $69,839
 $702,556
Cumulative goodwill impairment charges were $42,029 as of June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, which relate to the Company's United Kingdom and Continental Europe (which is included in "Rest of World" - see note 17) operating segments. Other adjustments during fiscal 2012 relate to the recording of deferred tax liabilities for acquired indefinite-lived intangible assets for certain acquisitions completed prior to 2009. The recording of such deferred tax liabilities increased the goodwill associated with those acquisitions. There was no impact to the Company's consolidated statement of income as a result of this adjustment.
The Company performs its annual test for goodwill and indefinite lived intangible asset impairment on the first day of the fourth quarter of its fiscal year. In addition, if and when events or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any of its reporting units or indefinite-life intangible assets below their carrying value, an interim test is performed. The Company completed its annual impairment analysis forDuring the fiscal year 2012,ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a non-cash partial impairment charge of $5,510 related to a United Kingdom indefinite-lived intangible asset (the Company’s New Covent Garden Soup Co.® trademark). There were no other impairment charges recorded during fiscal 2014 or 2015.

71




Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
 United States United Kingdom Hain Pure Protein Rest of World Total
Balance as of June 30, 2013 (a)$574,558
 $232,849
 $
 $68,699
 $876,106
Acquisition activity27,766
 190,772
 
 520
 219,058
Translation and other adjustments, net5,002
 34,197
 
 5
 39,204
Balance as of June 30, 2014 (a)607,326
 457,818
 
 69,224
 1,134,368
Acquisition activity3,792
 (1,395) 45,328
 2,927
 50,652
Translation and other adjustments, net(3,275) (36,257) 
 (9,409) (48,941)
Balance as of June 30, 2015 (a)$607,843
 $420,166
 $45,328
 $62,742
 $1,136,079

(a) The total carrying value of goodwill for all periods in the table above is reflected net of $42,029 of accumulated impairment charges recorded during fiscal 2009 which included a qualitative assessment for certain reporting units underrelate to the newly adopted guidance in ASU 2011-08 (see Note 2).Company’s United Kingdom and Europe operating segments.

Amounts assigned to indefinite-life intangible assets primarily represent the values of trademarks and tradenames. At June 30, 2012,2015, included in trademarks and other intangible assets on the balance sheet are $108,504$207,609 of intangible assets deemed to have a finite life, which are primarily related to customer relationships, and are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 20 years.25 years. The following table reflects the components of trademarks and other intangible assets:
June 30,
2012
 June 30,
2011
June 30,
2015
 June 30,
2014
Non-amortized intangible assets:      
Trademarks and tradenames$230,945
 $176,822
$507,853
 $498,068
Amortized intangible assets:      
Other intangibles108,504
 48,923
207,609
 206,071
Less: accumulated amortization(29,071) (18,361)(67,708) (52,657)
Net carrying amount$310,378
 $207,384
$647,754
 $651,482


55



Amortization expense included in continuing operations was as follows:
 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2012 2011 2010
Amortization of intangible assets$9,150
 $5,333
 $2,307
 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2015 2014 2013
Amortization of intangible assets$17,985
 $15,600
 $12,398


Expected amortization expense over the next five fiscal years is as follows:
 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Estimated amortization expense$10,159
 $9,847
 $9,740
 $8,945
 $8,763
 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Estimated amortization expense$17,017
 $16,613
 $16,522
 $13,967
 $13,592

The weighted average remaining amortization period of amortized intangible assets is 9.1 years.10.2 years.




8.
72



9.    ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following:
 June 30,
2012
 June 30,
2011
Payroll and employee benefits$25,272
 $17,945
Advertising and trade promotions21,970
 16,558
Contingent consideration375
 23,901
Other12,852
 13,609
 $60,469
 $72,013
 June 30,
2015
 June 30,
2014
Payroll, employee benefits and other administrative accruals$65,044
 $54,171
Selling and marketing related accruals10,938
 11,310
Contingent consideration, current portion
 5,611
Other3,185
 13,814
 $79,167
 $84,906


9.    LONG-TERM10.    DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITYBORROWINGS
Long-term debt
Debt and borrowings consisted of the following:
June 30,
2012
 June 30,
2011
June 30,
2015
 June 30,
2014
Senior Notes$150,000
 $150,000
$150,000
 $150,000
Revolving Credit Agreement borrowings payable to banks240,000
 79,000
660,216
 614,502
Capitalized leases and equipment financing584
 1,173
Tilda short-term borrowing arrangements29,600
 65,975
Vendor Loan Note (see note 4)

 34,056
Other borrowings4,067
 3,390
390,584
 230,173
843,883
 867,923
Current Portion296
 633
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt31,275
 100,096
$390,288
 $229,540
$812,608
 $767,827
We have $150
The Company has $150 million in aggregate principal amount of 10 year senior notes due May 2, 2016 issued in a private placement. The notes bear interest at 5.98%, payable semi-annually on November 2 and May 2. As of June 30, 2012, $150,0002015, $150,000 of the senior notes was outstanding. The Company has the ability and currently intends to refinance these borrowings on a long-term basis on or before the maturity date and therefore has classified these borrowings as long-term.
We have a credit agreement
On December 12, 2014, the Company entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) which provides us withfor a $600 million$1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”), expiring in July 2015.which may be increased by an additional uncommitted $350 million, provided certain conditions are met. The Credit Agreement was increased on August 20, 2012 from $400 million to $600 million uponexpires in December 2019. Borrowings under the exercise of an existing $100 million accordion feature, which feature was increased to $200 million. BorrowingsCredit Agreement may be used to provide working capital, finance capital expenditures and permitted acquisitions, refinance certain existing indebtedness and for other lawful corporate purposes. The Credit Agreement amends and restates the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2012. The Credit Agreement provides for multicurrency borrowings in Euros, Pounds Sterling and Canadian Dollars as well as other currencies which may be designated. In addition, certain wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries of the Company may be designated as co-borrowers. The Credit Agreement contains restrictive covenants usual and customary for facilities of its type, which include, with specified exceptions, limitations on ourthe Company’s ability to engage in certain business activities, incur debt, have liens, make capital expenditures, pay dividends or make other distributions, enter into affiliate transactions, consolidate, merge or acquire or dispose of assets, and make certain investments, acquisitions and loans. The Credit Agreement also requires that wethe Company to satisfy certain financial covenants, such as maintaining a consolidated interest coverage ratio (as defined)defined in the Credit Agreement) of no less than 4.004.0 to 1.001.0 and a consolidated leverage ratio (as defined)defined in the Credit Agreement) of no more than 3.503.5 to 1.00, which1.0. The consolidated leverage ratio may

56


increaseis subject to no more than 4.0a step-up to 4.0 to 1.0 for the twelve-month periodfour full fiscal quarters following a permittedan acquisition. Our obligationsObligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by all of ourcertain existing and future domestic subsidiaries subject to certain exceptions.of the Company. As of June 30, 2012,2015, there were $240,000$660,216 of borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement.


73



The Credit Agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based on (a) the Eurocurrency Rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a rate ranging from 1.25%0.875% to 3.00%1.70% per annumannum; or (b) the Base Rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a rate ranging from 0.25%0.00% to 2.00%0.70% per annum, the relevant rate being the Applicable Rate. The Applicable Rate will be determined in accordance with a leverage-based pricing grid, as set forth in the Credit Agreement.  Swing line loans and Global Swing Line loans denominated in U.S. dollars will bear interest at the Base Rate plus the Applicable Rate and Global Swing Line loans denominated in foreign currencies shall bear interest based on the overnight Eurocurrency Rate for loans denominated in such currency plus the Applicable Rate. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement at June 30, 2015 was 1.69%. Additionally, the Credit Agreement contains a Commitment Fee, as defined in the Credit Agreement, on the amount unused under the Credit Agreement ranging from 0.25%0.20% to 0.45%0.30% per annum. Such Commitment Fee is determined in accordance with a leverage-based pricing grid, as set forth in the Credit Agreement.

Tilda maintains short-term borrowing arrangements primarily used to fund the purchase of rice from India and other countries. The maximum borrowings permitted under all such arrangements are £50,393. Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by the current assets of Tilda, typically have six month terms and bear interest at variable rates typically based on LIBOR plus a margin (weighted average interest rate of approximately 2.8% at June 30, 2015).

Maturities of all debt instruments at June 30, 2012,2015, are as follows:

Due in Fiscal Year Amount
2013 $296
2014 276
2015 12
2016 390,000
  $390,584
Due in Fiscal Year Amount
2016 $31,275
2017 2,130
2018 197
2019 60
2020 810,221
  $843,883

Interest paid (which approximates the related expense) during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 and 20102013 amounted to $14,377, $11,004$22,865, $20,560 and $10,216,$19,154, respectively.


10.11.    INCOME TAXES

The components of income before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investees were as follows:
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Domestic$111,255
 $95,048
 $66,005
$176,898
 $157,492
 $130,908
Foreign22,973
 3,879
 2,287
38,392
 50,102
 22,914
Total$134,228
 $98,927
 $68,292
$215,290
 $207,594
 $153,822

74




The provision for income taxes is presented below.
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Current     
Current:     
Federal$28,983
 $24,878
 $20,357
$41,268
 $46,722
 $31,370
State and local3,414
 4,833
 2,361
8,237
 7,891
 3,792
Foreign6,050
 2,437
 2,231
9,981
 16,836
 6,565
38,447
 32,148
 24,949
59,486
 71,449
 41,727
Deferred:          
Federal3,963
 4,201
 515
(10,191) 2,287
 (4,064)
State and local493
 501
 205
(932) 372
 (405)
Foreign(1,749) 958
 2,693
(480) (4,009) (2,934)
2,707
 5,660
 3,413
(11,603) (1,350) (7,403)
Total$41,154
 $37,808
 $28,362
$47,883
 $70,099
 $34,324

Income taxes paid during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 amounted to $21,902, $34,297$47,317, $47,339 and $12,335,$22,051, respectively.

57


Reconciliations of expected income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% to the Company’s provision for income taxes for the fiscal years ended June 30 were as follows:
2012 % 2011 % 2010 %2015 % 2014 % 2013 %
Expected U.S. federal income tax at statutory rate$46,980
 35.0 % $34,624
 35.0 % $23,902
 35.0 %$75,352
 35.0 % $72,659
 35.0 % $53,838
 35.0 %
State income taxes, net of federal benefit3,267
 2.4 % 3,467
 3.5 % 2,356
 3.4 %4,834
 2.2 % 5,371
 2.6 % 3,278
 2.1 %
Domestic manufacturing deduction(2,275) (1.7)% (2,191) (2.2)% (770) (1.1)%(1,210) (0.6)% (2,482) (1.2)% (2,563) (1.7)%
Non-deductible compensation216
 0.2 % 1,278
 1.3 % 1,194
 1.7 %
Foreign income at different rates(11,513) (8.6)% (534) (0.5)% (2,555) (3.7)%(9,105) (4.2)% (4,842) (2.3)% (4,950) (3.2)%
Effect of settled tax matters
  % 
  % (1,205) (1.8)%
Valuation allowances established for UK losses
  % 2,118
 2.1 % 5,721
 8.4 %
Contingent consideration expense reversal5,434
 4.0 % 
  % 
  %
Corporate tax reorganization(20,670) (9.6)% 
  % 
  %
Non-taxable gains on acquisition of pre-existing ownership interests in HPPC and Empire(2,890) (1.3)% 
  % 
  %
Worthless stock deduction
  % 
  % (13,186) (8.6)%
Reduction of deferred tax liabilities resulting from change in United Kingdom tax rate
  % (3,739) (1.8)% (2,288) (1.4)%
Other(955) (0.6)% (954) (1.0)% (281) (0.4)%1,572
 0.7 % 3,132
 1.5 % 195
 0.1 %
Provision for income taxes$41,154
 30.7 % $37,808
 38.2 % $28,362
 41.5 %$47,883
 22.2 % $70,099
 33.8 % $34,324
 22.3 %

We have deferredThe effective tax benefits relatedrate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 includes an income tax benefit $20,670 resulting from an election made during the fiscal year to carryforward losses and deferredchange the tax assets in the United Kingdom of $4,594, against which full valuation allowances have been recorded. These valuation allowances were initially recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 as a resultstatus of the Company’s evaluationCanadian subsidiary.


75



Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Components of our deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows:
June 30,
2012
 
June 30,
 2011
June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014
Current deferred tax assets:      
Basis difference on inventory$4,359
 $4,628
$8,106
 $5,995
Reserves not currently deductible11,106
 8,853
12,334
 17,365
Other369
 512
318
 420
Current deferred tax assets15,834
 13,993
20,758
 23,780
      
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities:   
Noncurrent deferred tax assets/(liabilities):   
Basis difference on intangible assets(93,090) (40,752)(155,049) (143,478)
Basis difference on property and equipment(13,976) (11,226)(21,067) (17,782)
Other comprehensive income(8,246) (7,678)(1,217) (7,969)
Noncurrent deferred tax assets:   
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards11,204
 12,058
31,996
 24,067
Stock based compensation3,458
 2,705
6,828
 6,526
Other(8) (626)2,267
 27
Valuation allowances(6,975) (6,402)(9,055) (9,830)
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net(107,633) (51,921)(145,297) (148,439)
$(91,799) $(37,928)   
Total net deferred tax liabilities$(124,539) $(124,659)


58


We have U.S. foreign tax credit carryforwards of $1,012$3,998 at June 30, 20122015 with various expiration dates through 2020.2025. We have U.S. federal tax net operating losses available for carryforward at June 30, 20122015 of $3,551$42,880 that were generated by certain subsidiaries prior to their acquisition and have expiration dates through 2028.2033. The use of pre-acquisition operating losses is subject to limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. We do not anticipate that these limitations will affect utilization of the carryforwards recorded prior to their expiration. In addition

We have deferred tax benefits related to theforeign net operating losses, primarily in the United Kingdom and Germany, and to a lesser extent in Belgium, totaling $9,055. The losses in the United Kingdom described above, we also have deferred tax benefitswere recorded prior to the acquisition of Daniels and in Germany were the result of certain factory start-up costs incurred in prior years for foreign net operatingthe Company’s plant-based beverage facility. These losses of $2,114 which are availablerepresented sufficient evidence to reduce future income tax liabilities in Belgium and the Netherlands. The Company believes it is more likely than notdetermine that these net operating losses will not be realized and a valuation allowance has been established againstfor these deferredcarryforward losses was appropriate. Under current tax assets.law in these jurisdictions, our carryforward losses have no expiration. If the Company is able to realize any of these carryforward losses in the future, the provision for income taxes will be reduced by a release of the corresponding valuation allowance.

The changes in valuation allowances against deferred income tax assets were as follows:
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 20112015 2014
Balance at beginning of year$6,402
 $7,041
$9,830
 $10,456
Additions charged to income tax expense1,064
 89
214
 2,226
Reductions credited to income tax expense
 (1,255)
 (760)
Net change from liquidations, tax rate changes and other
 (3,036)
Currency translation adjustments(491) 527
(989) 944
Balance at end of year$6,975
 $6,402
$9,055
 $9,830


76



As of June 30, 2012,2015, the Company had approximately $38,225$155,152 of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries for which taxes have not been provided as the Company has invested or expects to invest these undistributed earnings indefinitely. If in the future these earnings are repatriated to the U.S., or if the Company determines such earnings will be remitted in the foreseeable future, additional tax provisions would be required. Due to complexities in the tax laws and the assumptions that would have to be made, it is not practicable to estimate the amounts of income taxes that might be payable if some or all of such earnings were to be remitted.

Unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, activity is summarized below:
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Balance at beginning of year$1,472
 $2,248
 $2,489
$2,351
 $2,507
 $1,337
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years15
 224
 304
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year722
 750
 574
Additions for acquired companies690
 
 

 
 941
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
 
 (545)
Reductions due to lapse in statute of limitations(840) (1,000) 
Reductions due to lapse in statute of limitations and settlements(753) (906) (345)
Balance at end of year$1,337
 $1,472
 $2,248
$2,320
 $2,351
 $2,507

At June 30, 2012, $1,1782015, $2,320 represents the amount that would impact the effective tax rate in future periods if recognized.

The Company records interest and penalties on tax uncertainties as a component of the provision for income taxes. The Company recognized $(135), $224$10, $6 and $113$268 of interest and penalties related to the above unrecognized benefits within income tax expense for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively. The Company had accrued $152$86 and $287$76 for interest and penalties at the end of fiscal 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. The Company reduced its reserves by $840 and $1,000 in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively, as a result of an expiration of certain statutes of limitations. In addition, the Internal Revenue Service completed the examination of our income tax returns for fiscal years 2005 and 2006 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, which resulted in the receipt of a small refund. As a result, the Company reduced its reserves for uncertain tax positions by $400.

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state jurisdictions and several foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2008.2012. The Company is no longer subject to tax examinations in the United Kingdom for years prior to 2012. Given the uncertainty regarding when tax authorities will complete their examinations and the possible outcomes of their examinations, a current estimate of the range of reasonably possible significant increases or decreases of income tax that may occur within the next twelve months cannot be made. There are various tax audits currently ongoing, however the Company does not believe the ultimate outcome of such audits will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.



11.12. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

59


Preferred Stock
We are
The Company is authorized to issue “blank check” preferred stock of up to 5 million shares with such designations, rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. Accordingly, the Board of Directors is empowered to issue, without stockholder approval, preferred stock with dividends, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other rights which could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to holders of ourthe Company’s Common Stock. At June 30, 20122015 and 2011, 2014, no preferred stock was issued or outstanding.


77



Common Stock Issued

In connection with the acquisition of HPPC during fiscal 2015, 462,856 shares at a total value of $19,690 were issued to the assetssellers. In connection with the acquisitions of Rudi’s and businessTilda during fiscal 2014, 3,559,834 shares at a total value of Greek Gods in$159,521 were issued to the first quartersellers. In connection with the acquisitions of the UK Ambient Grocery Brands, BluePrint and Ella’s Kitchen during fiscal 2011, 242,1852013, 3,396,944 shares at a total value of $102,636 were issued to the sellers valued at $4,785. (See(see Note 4).
In connection with the acquisition of the assets and business of World Gourmet in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, 1,558,442 shares were issued to the sellers, valued at $35,392. (See Note 4)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated
The following tables present the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as reflected on the balance sheet consisted of the following::
 
June 30,
2012
 
June 30,
2011
Foreign currency translation adjustment$(5,670) $7,903
Unrealized gain/(loss) on available for sale securities17
 (187)
Deferred gains/(losses) on hedging instruments270
 (572)
Total accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)$(5,383) $7,144
 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2015 2014
Foreign currency translation adjustments:   
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (1)
$(103,209) $90,625
Amounts reclassified into income
 
Deferred gains/(losses) on cash flow hedging instruments:   
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications5,449
 (1,214)
Amounts reclassified into income (2)
(3,868) (190)
Unrealized gain on available for sale investment:   
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(595) (1,121)
Amounts reclassified into income (3)
(311) (721)
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)$(102,534) $87,379

(1)
Foreign currency translation adjustments include intra-entity foreign currency transactions that are of a long-term investment nature of $40,017and $21,862 for fiscal years ended June 30, 2015and 2014,respectively.
(2)Amounts reclassified into income for deferred gains on cash flow hedging instruments are recorded in “Cost of sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Income and, before taxes, were $5,087 and $284 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(3)Amounts reclassified into income for gains on sale of available for sale investments were based on the average cost of the shares held (See Note 14). Such amounts are recorded in “Interest and other expenses, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. There was no tax expense associated with these gains reclassified into income as the Company utilized capital losses to offset these gains.


12.13.    STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVE PERFORMANCE PLANS

On December 29, 2014, we effected a two-for-one stock split of our common stock in the form of a 100% stock dividend to shareholders of record as of December 12, 2014. All share and option exercise and restricted stock price information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.

The Company has two shareholder-approved plans, the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan and the 2000 Directors Stock Plan, under which the Company’s officers, senior management, other key employees, consultants and directors may be granted options to purchase the Company’s common stock or other forms of equity-based awards.

2002 Long-Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan, as amended. In November 2002, our stockholders approved the 2002 Long-Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan. An aggregate of 1,600,0003,200,000 shares of common stock were originally reserved for issuance under this plan. At various Annual Meetings of Stockholders, including the 20112014 Annual Meeting, the plan was amended to increase the number of shares issuable to 10,750,00031,500,000 shares. The plan provides for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted share units, performance shares, performance share units and other equity awards to employees, directors and consultants. Awards denominated in shares of common stock other than options and stock appreciation rights will be counted against the available share limit as 2.07 shares for every one share covered by such award. All of the options granted to date under the plan have been incentive or non-qualified stock options providing for the exercise price equal to the fair market price at the date of grant. Effective December 1, 2005, stockStock option awards granted under the plan expire 7 years after the date of grant; options granted prior to this date expired 10 years after the date of grant. Options and other stock-based awards vest in accordance with provisions set forth in the applicable award agreements. No awards shall be granted under this plan after December 1, 2015.November 20, 2024.

78



There were no options granted under this plan in fiscal years 20122015, 2014 or 2011. During fiscal year 2010, options to purchase 173,289 shares were granted under this plan with an estimated fair value of $6.03 per share.2013.

There were 258,923, 241,324439,652, 387,760 and 119,4361,290,254 shares of restricted stock and restricted share units granted under this plan during fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively. Included in these grants during fiscal years 20122015, 2014 and 20112013 were 150,699365,400, 353,120 and 183,449,1,227,200, respectively, of restricted stock and restricted share units granted under the Company’s long-term incentive programs, of which 75,361108,638, 74,680 and 122,841,898,032, respectively, are subject to the achievement of minimum performance goals established under those programs (see “Long-term Incentive Plan,” below). or market conditions.

At June 30, 2012, 2,402,4612015, 1,126,968 options and 416,1621,098,254 unvested restricted stock and restricted share units were outstanding under this plan and there were 3,515,6489,339,767 shares available for grant under this plan.

2000 Directors Stock Plan, as amended. In May 2000, our stockholders approved the 2000 Directors Stock Plan. The plan originally provided for the granting of stock options to non-employee directors to purchase up to an aggregate of 750,0001,500,000 shares of our common stock. In December 2003, the plan was amended to increase the number of shares issuable to 950,0001,900,000 shares. In March 2009, the plan was amended to permit the granting of restricted stock, restricted share units and dividend equivalents and was renamed. All of the options granted to date under this plan have been non-qualified stock options providing for the exercise price equal to the fair market price at the date of grant. Effective December 1, 2005, stockStock option

60


awards granted under the plan expire 7 years after the date of grant; optionsgrant. No awards shall be granted prior tounder this date expire 10 yearsplan after the date of grant.December 1, 2015.

There were no options granted under this plan in fiscal years 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, or 2010.2013.

There were 40,000, 31,500,19,800, 28,000, and 38,75049,500 shares of restricted stock granted under this plan during fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively.

At June 30, 2012, 97,000 options and 71,2472015, 46,788 unvested restricted shares were outstanding and there were 50,795will be no further shares available for grantor options granted under this plan.

At June 30, 20122015 there were also 80,972121,944 options outstanding that were granted under two otherthe prior Hain and Celestial Seasonings plans.plan. Although no further awards can be granted under those plans, the options outstanding continue in accordance with the terms of the respective plans and grants.

There were 6,634,28511,723,361 shares of Common Stock reserved for future issuance in connection with stock based awards as of June 30, 2012.2015.

Compensation cost and related income tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for stock based compensation plans were as follows:
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Compensation cost (included in selling, general and administrative expense)$8,290
 $9,031
 $6,979
$12,197
 $12,448
 $13,010
Related income tax benefit$3,019
 $3,077
 $2,153
$4,695
 $4,787
 $4,969


79



Stock Options

A summary of ourthe stock option activity for the three fiscal years ended June 30, 20122015 is as follows:
 
2012
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 2011
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 2010
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
2015 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 2014 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 2013 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Outstanding at beginning of year3,497,752
$17.35 5,153,233
$20.42 5,568,667
$20.642,674,290
 $9.83
 3,557,504
 $9.44
 5,160,866
 $9.00
Granted
 
 173,289
$18.20
Exercised(914,119)$15.51 (899,681)$19.91 (126,713)$16.88(1,425,378) $13.08
 (882,614) $8.30
 (1,590,562) $8.03
Canceled and expired(3,200)$16.11 (755,800)$35.25 (462,010)$24.28
 $
 (600) $8.01
 (12,800) $7.44
Outstanding at end of year2,580,433
$18.00 3,497,752
$17.35 5,153,233
$20.421,248,912
 $6.12
 2,674,290
 $9.83
 3,557,504
 $9.44
Options exercisable at end of year2,289,642
$18.55 2,811,784
$17.44 4,072,092
$21.101,248,912
 $6.12
 2,674,290
 $9.83
 3,470,854
 $9.45

Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Intrinsic value of options exercised$23,798
 $10,275
 $373
$62,213
 $29,778
 $39,562
Cash received from stock option exercises$14,179
 $17,912
 $2,139
$18,643
 $7,320
 $12,763
Tax benefit recognized from stock option exercises$8,811
 $3,930
 $140
$24,213
 $11,584
 $14,468

For options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2012,2015, the aggregate intrinsic value (the difference between the closing stock price on the last day of trading in the year and the exercise price) was $95,579$74,616 and the weighted average remaining contractual life was 3.1 years. For options exercisable at 2.3 years. At June 30, 2012, the aggregate intrinsic value was $83,552 and the weighted average remaining contractual life was 3.0 years. At June 30, 20122015 there was $702 ofno unrecognized compensation expense related to stock option awards, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.0 year.awards.
The fair value of stock options granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions for options granted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:

61


Risk-free rate2.38%
Expected volatility34.20%
Expected life (years)4.75
Dividend yield0%
Fair value at grant date$6.03
Restricted Stock

Awards of restricted stock may be either grants of restricted stock or restricted share units that are issued at no cost to the recipient. For restricted stock grants, at the date of grant the recipient has all rights of a stockholder, subject to certain restrictions on transferability and a risk of forfeiture. For restricted share units, legal ownership of the shares is not transferred to the employee until the unit vests. Restricted stock and restricted share unit grants vest in accordance with provisions set forth in the applicable award agreements, which may include performance criteria for certain grants. The compensation cost of these awards is determined using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. Compensation expense for restricted stock awards with a service condition is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting term. Compensation expense for restricted stock awards with a performance condition is recorded when the achievement of the performance criteria is probable and is recognized over the performance and vesting service periods.
Non-vested Restricted Stock Activity
A summary of ourthe restricted stock and restricted share units activity for the three fiscal years ended June 30, 20122015 is as follows:
2012 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair 
Value
(per share)
 2011 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair 
Value
(per share)
 2010 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair 
Value
(per share)
2015 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair 
Value
(per share)
 2014 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair 
Value
(per share)
 2013 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair 
Value
(per share)
Non-vested restricted stock and restricted share units – beginning of year407,231
 $22.43 410,553
 $19.93 489,878
 $21.73
Non-vested restricted stock and restricted share units - beginning of year1,258,744
 $25.44 1,547,136
 $21.22 974,818
 $14.97
Granted235,824
 $35.47 272,824
 $26.10 158,186
 $18.26311,284
 $54.11 224,792
 $41.39 1,123,064
 $22.80
Vested(136,031) $17.51 (256,554) $22.17 (209,398) $23.24(401,936) $26.86 (476,290) $19.09 (531,638) $13.12
Forfeited(19,615) $26.71 (19,592) $22.47 (28,113) $17.31(23,050) $40.65 (36,894) $28.72 (19,108) $19.37
Non-vested restricted stock and restricted share units – end of year487,409
 $29.94 407,231
 $22.43 410,553
 $19.93
Non-vested restricted stock and restricted share units - end of year1,145,042
 $32.30 1,258,744
 $25.44 1,547,136
 $21.22


80



 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2015 2014 2013
Fair value of restricted stock and restricted share units granted$16,462
 $9,303
 $25,606
Fair value of shares vested$21,481
 $19,905
 $16,547
Tax benefit recognized from restricted shares vesting$8,364
 $7,535
 $6,253

 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2012 2011 2010
Fair value of restricted stock and restricted share units granted$8,364
 $7,121
 $2,889
Fair value of shares vested$5,098
 $5,689
 $3,636
Tax benefit recognized from restricted shares vesting$1,914
 $2,253
 $1,347
At June 30, 2012, $7,608 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.6 years.
On July 3, 2012, the Company entered into a Restricted Stock Agreement (the "Agreement"“Agreement”) with Irwin D. Simon, the Company'sCompany’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The Agreement provides for a grant of 400,000800,000 shares of restricted stock (the "Shares"“Shares”), the vesting of which is both market and time-based. With respect to theThe market condition the Shares will satisfy the market conditionis satisfied in increments of 100,000200,000 Shares each based onupon the Company'sCompany’s common stock achieving four share price targets. On the last day of any forty-five (45) consecutive trading day period during which the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market equals or exceeds the following prices: $62.50, $72.50, $82.50$31.25, $36.25, $41.25 and $100.00,$50.00, respectively, 100,000the market condition for each increment of 200,000 Shares will have satisfied the market condition.be satisfied. The market conditions must be satisfied prior to June 30, 2017. Once each market condition has been satisfied, a tranche of 100,000200,000 Shares will vest in equal amounts annually over a five yearfive-year period. Except in the case of a change of control, termination without cause, death or disability (each as defined in Mr. Simon’s Employment Agreement), the unvested Shares are subject to forfeiture unless Mr. Simon remains employed through the applicable market and time vesting periods. The grant date fair value for each tranche

62


was separately estimated based on a Monte Carlo simulation that calculated the likelihood of goal attainment and the time frame most likely for goal attainment. The total grant date fair value of the Shares was estimated to be $16,151,$16,151, which was expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 4.0 years. On September 28, 2012, August 27, 2013, December 13, 2013, and October 22, 2014, the four respective market conditions were satisfied. As such, the four tranches of 200,000 Shares are expected to vest in equal amounts over the five-year period commencing on the first anniversary of the date the market condition for the respective tranche was satisfied.

At June 30, 2015, $19,378 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock awards, inclusive of the Shares, is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 4.6 years.2.2 years.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

The Company adopted, beginning in fiscal 2010, the Executive Incentive Plan, which includesmaintains a long-term incentive program (the “LTI Plan”). The LTI Plan currently consists of two two-year performance-based long-term incentive plans (the “2011-2012“2014-2015 LTIP” and the “2012-2013“2015-2016 LTIP”) that provideprovides for a combination of equity grants and performance awards that can be earned over theeach two year period. The initial two-year long-term incentive plan (the “2010-2011 LTIP”) concluded in fiscal 2011.2015-2016 LTIP awards contain an additional year of time-based vesting. Participants in the LTI Plan include ourthe Company’s executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, and certain other key executives.

The Compensation Committee administers the LTI Plan and is responsible for, among other items, establishing the target values of awards to participants and selecting the specific performance factors for such awards. AtFollowing the end of each performance period, the Compensation Committee determines, at its sole discretion, the specific payout to each participant. Such awards may be paid in cash and/or unrestricted shares of the Company’s common stock at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, provided that any such stock-based awards shall be issued pursuant to and be subject to the terms and conditions of the Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan, as in effect and as amended from time to time. Upon the adoption of each two year plan,the 2014-2015 LTIP and the 2015-2016 LTIP, the Compensation Committee granted an initial award to each participant in the form of equity-based instruments (either restricted(restricted stock or stock options)restricted share units), for a portion of the individual target awards (the “Initial Equity Grants”). These Initial Equity Grants are subject to time vesting requirements and a portion of the 2011-2012 LTIP and 2012-2013 LTIP related grants are also subject to the achievement of minimum performance goals. The Initial Equity Grants are expensed over the respective vesting periods on a straight-line basis. The payment of the actual awards earned at the end of the applicable performance period, if any, will be reduced by the value of the Initial Equity Grants.

The Compensation Committee determined that the target values previously set under the 2010-2011 LTIPLTI Plan covering the 2013 and 2014 fiscal years (the “2013-2014 LTIP”) were achieved and approved the payment of awards to the participants. The awards totaled $7,825 afterAfter deducting the value of the Initial Equity Grants, andthe awards related to the 2013-2014 LTIP totaled $7,439 (which were settled by the issuance of 63,099148,168 unrestricted shares of the Company’s common stock and $5,869in cash inthe first quarter of fiscal 2012. 2015).

The Company has determined that the achievement of certain of the performance goals for the 2011-2012 LTIP and 2012-2013 LTIP are probable and, accordingly, recorded expense (in addition to the stock based compensation expense associated with the Initial Equity Grants) of $8,743$4,967, $9,495 and $9,239$7,460 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013 respectively, related to LTI plans.



81

13.


14.    INVESTMENTS AND JOINT VENTURES

Equity method investments

At June 30, 2012,2015, the Company owned 48.7% of Hain Pure Protein. This investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The carrying value of our investment of $25,553 and advances to HPP of $10,152 are included on the consolidated balance sheet in “Investments and joint ventures.” The Company previously provided advances to HPP when it was a consolidated subsidiary to finance its operations. Simultaneously with the dilution of the Company’s interest in HPP in June 2009 and its deconsolidation, HPP entered into a separate credit agreement. The Company and HPP entered into a subordination agreement covering the outstanding advances at the date of deconsolidation. The subordination agreement allows for prepayments of the advances based on HPP’s meeting certain conditions under its credit facility. HPP repaid $6,934 of the advances during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The balance of the advances are due no later than July 1, 2014.
At June 30, 2012, the Company also owned 50.0% of a joint venture, Hutchison Hain Organic Holdings Limited (“HHO”), with Hutchison China Meditech Ltd. (“Chi-Med”),Chi-Med, a majority owned subsidiary of CK Hutchison WhampoaHoldings Limited. HHO markets and distributes co-branded infant and toddler feeding products and markets and distributes selected Companycertain of the Company’s brands in Hong Kong, China and other markets. Voting control of the joint venture is shared 50/50 between the Company and Chi-Med, although, in the event of a deadlock, Chi-Med has the ability to cast the deciding vote. The carrying value of ourthe investment and advances to HHO of $2,670$1,109 are included on the consolidated balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheet in “Investments and joint ventures.” The investment is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Available-For-Sale Securities

The Company has a less than 1% equity ownership interest in Yeo Hiap Seng Limited (“YHS”), a Singapore based natural food and beverage company listed on the Singapore Exchange, which is accounted for as an available-for-sale security. The Company sold 2,037,400 and 2,299,000 of its YHS shares during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which resulted in pre-tax gains of $311 and $1,511, respectively, on the sales. The remaining shares held at June 30, 2015 totaled 1,035,338. The fair value of this securitythese shares held was $6,725 at June 30, 2012 and $6,390 at June 30, 2011$1,196 (cost basis of $6,696 as$1,291) at June 30, 2015 and $5,314 (cost basis of both dates)$3,831) at June 30, 2014 and is included in “Investments and joint ventures,” with the related unrealized gain or loss, net of tax, included in “Accumulated

63


other comprehensive income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


14.15.    FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value are required to be grouped in one of three levels. The levels prioritize the inputs used to measure the fair value of the assets or liabilities. These levels are:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 – Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;
Level 3 – Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

The following table presents by level within the fair value hierarchy assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012:2015: 
Total 
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
Total 
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:              
Cash equivalents$300
 
 $300
 
$45,101
 $45,101
 $
 $
Forward foreign currency contracts361
 
 361
 
1,590
 
 1,590
 
Available for sale securities6,725
 $6,725
 
 
1,196
 1,196
 
 
$7,386
 $6,725
 $661
 
$47,887
 $46,297
 $1,590
 $
Liabilities:              
Contingent consideration, of which $6,207 is noncurrent$6,582
 
 
 $6,582
Forward foreign currency contracts$274
 $
 $274
 $
Contingent consideration, of which $3,789 is noncurrent3,789
 
 
 3,789
Total$6,582
 
 
 $6,582
$4,063
 $
 $274
 $3,789


82



The following table presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011:2014:
Total 
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
Total 
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:              
Cash equivalents$7,300
 
 $7,300
 
$31,902
 $31,902
 $
 $
Forward foreign currency contracts391
 
 391
 
Available for sale securities6,390
 $6,390
 
 
5,314
 5,314
 
 
$13,690
 $6,390
 $7,300
 
$37,607
 $37,216
 $391
 $
Liabilities:              
Forward foreign currency contracts$766
 
 $766
 
$1,168
 $
 $1,168
 $
Contingent consideration, of which $13,244 is noncurrent37,145
 
 
 $37,145
Contingent consideration, of which $2,669 is noncurrent8,280
 
 
 8,280
Total$37,911
 
 $766
 $37,145
$9,448
 $
 $1,168
 $8,280

Available for sale securities consist of the Company’s investment in YHS (see Note 13)14).  Fair value is measured using the market approach based on quoted prices.  The Company utilizes the income approach to measure fair value for its foreign currency forward contracts.  The income approach uses pricing models that rely on market observable inputs such as yield curves, currency exchange rates, and forward prices.

In connection with the acquisitions of Belvedere in February 2015, Cully & Sully in April 2012 Daniels in October 2011,and GG UniqeFiberUniqueFiber AS in January 2011, the assets and business of Greek Gods in July 2010 and the assets and business of World Gourmet in June 2010, payment of a portion of the respective purchase prices are contingent upon the achievement of certain operating results. WeThe Company estimated the original fair value of the contingent consideration as the present value of the expected contingent payments, determined using the weighted probabilities of the possible payments. We areThe Company is required to reassess the fair value of contingent payments on a periodic basis. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, the Company reassessed the fair value of the contingent

64


consideration for each of these acquisitions, which resulted in a reduction of expense related to the Daniels acquisition of $15,527. Additionally, during fiscal 2012, the Company finalized the payment of contingent consideration related to the acquisition of the Sensible Portions brand which resulted in2015, additional expense of $900. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, additional expense of $443$280 was recorded related to the Greek GodsCully & Sully acquisition, and a reduction of expense of $4,620in October 2014, $5,477 was recorded relatedpaid to the World Gourmet acquisition.sellers in settlement of this obligation. The significant inputs used in these estimates include a weighted average discount rate of 12.1% (which is based on a risk analysisthe estimate of the respective liabilities)remaining obligation for Belvedere and GG UniqueFiber include numerous possible scenarios for the payments based on the contractual terms of the contingent consideration, for which probabilities are assigned to each scenario.scenario, which are then discounted based on an individual risk analysis of the liability (weighted average discount rate of 8.0% for the outstanding liability as of June 30, 2015). Although we believe ourthe Company believes its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions, including those regarding the operating results of the respective businesses, or changes in the future may result in different estimated amounts. A one percentage point change in the discount rates used would result in a change to the recorded liability of approximately $100 as of June 30, 2012.

The following table summarizes the Level 3 activity:
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 20112015 2014
Balance at beginning of year$37,145
 $28,580
$8,280
 $22,814
Fair value of initial contingent consideration19,000
 25,950
1,603
 
Contingent consideration adjustment and accretion of
interest expense, net
(15,131) (2,486)
Contingent consideration adjustments280
 (3,026)
Contingent consideration paid(33,230) (15,400)(5,477) (11,800)
Translation adjustment(1,202) 501
(897) 292
Balance at end of year$6,582
 $37,145
$3,789
 $8,280

There were no transfers of financial instruments between the three levels of fair value hierarchy during the fiscal years ended June 30, 20122015 or 2011.2014.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company primarily has exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates relating to certain anticipated cash flows from its international operations. To reduce that risk, the Company may enter into certain derivative financial instruments, when available on a cost-effective basis, to manage such risk. Derivative financial instruments are not used for speculative purposes.


83



The Company utilizes foreign currency contracts to hedge forecasted transactions, primarily intercompany transactions, on certain foreign currencies and designates these derivative instruments as foreign currency cash flow hedges when appropriate. The notional and fair value amounts of the Company’s foreign exchange derivative contracts at June 30, 20122015 were $16,550$47,202 and $361$1,316 of net assets. There were $13,650$69,431 of notional amount and $766$777 of net liabilities of foreign exchange derivative contracts outstanding at June 30, 2011.2014. The fair value of these derivatives is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For these derivatives, which qualify as hedges of probable forecasted cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair value is temporarily reported in accumulated OCIother comprehensive income and recognized in earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. These foreign exchange contracts have maturities over the next 13 months.12 months.

The Company assesses effectiveness at the inception of the hedge and on a quarterly basis. These assessments determine whether derivatives designated as qualifying hedges continue to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items. Any ineffective portion of change in fair value is not deferred in accumulated OCIother comprehensive income and is included in current period results. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 20122015 and 2011,2014, the impact of hedge ineffectiveness on earnings was not significant. The Company will discontinue cash flow hedge accounting when the forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring on the originally forecasted date or when the hedge is no longer effective. There were no discontinued foreign exchange hedges for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20122015 and 2011.2014.
The impact on OCI from foreign exchange contracts that qualified as cash flow hedges was as follows:

65


 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2012 2011
Net carrying amount at beginning of year$(572) $152
Cash flow hedges deferred in OCI1,127
 (975)
Changes in deferred taxes(285) 251
Net carrying amount at end of year$270
 $(572)

15.16.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease commitments and rent expense

The Company leases office, manufacturing and warehouse space. These leases provide for additional payments of real estate taxes and other operating expenses over a base period amount.

The aggregate minimum future lease payments for these operating leases at June 30, 2012,2015, are as follows:
Fiscal Year  
2013$12,566
201411,739
20158,413
20166,604
$15,695
20176,279
11,921
201810,630
20199,728
20207,440
Thereafter51,689
43,437
$97,290
$98,851

Rent expense charged to operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 , 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was $12,603, $10,332$27,028, $20,567 and $8,077,$16,449, respectively.

Legal proceedingsProceedings
From time to time, we are involved
On May 11, 2011, Rosminah Brown, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated individuals, as well as a non-profit organization, filed a putative class action in litigation incidentalthe Superior Court of California, Alameda County against the Company. The complaint alleged that the labels of certain Avalon Organics® brand and JASON® brand personal care products used prior to the Company’s implementation of ANSI/NSF-305 certification in mid-2011 violated certain California statutes. Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The action was consolidated with a subsequently-filed putative class action containing substantially identical allegations concerning only the JASON® brand personal care products. The consolidated actions sought an award for damages, injunctive relief, costs, expenses and attorney’s fees. In July 2015, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle the class action for $7,500 in addition to the distribution of consumer coupons up to a value of $2,000. In connection with the proposed settlement, the Company recorded a charge of $5,725 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 (a separate charge of $1,975 was recorded in prior years). The Company is currently working with the plaintiffs to finalize the matter.


84



Other

On August 19, 2014, the Company announced a voluntary recall on certain nut butters. In connection with the voluntary recall, the Company recorded pre-tax costs totaling $34,256 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 and previously recorded charges of $6,000 in fiscal 2014. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 the charges recorded primarily relate to returns of product from customers ($15,773) and inventory on-hand and other cost of goods sold charges ($13,574), and to a lesser extent consumer refunds and other administrative costs ($4,909). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration now considers this recall concluded and the Company does not anticipate any further material charges to be incurred.

In addition to the contingencies described above, the Company may be a party to a number of legal actions, proceedings, audits, tax audits, claims and disputes, arising in the ordinary conductcourse of our business. Dispositionbusiness, including those with current and former customers over amounts owed. While any action, proceeding, audit or claim contains an element of pending litigation related to these matters isuncertainty and may materially affect the Company’s cash flows and results of operations in a particular quarter or year, based on current facts and circumstances, the Company’s management believes that the outcome of such actions, proceedings, audits, claims and disputes will not expected by management to have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or financial condition.liquidity.



16.17.    DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS

We have a 401(k) Employee Retirement Plan (“Plan”(the “Plan”) to provide retirement benefits for eligible employees. All full-time employees of the Company and its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries are eligible to participate upon completion of 30 days of service. On an annual basis, we may, in our sole discretion, make certain matching contributions. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, we made contributions to the Plan of $491, $418$866, $539 and $278,$542, respectively.
Daniels maintains a
In addition, certain of our international subsidiaries maintain separate defined contribution planplans for United Kingdom eligible employees. Fortheir employees, however the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, contributions of $104 were made by Daniels. Our subsidiary, Hain-Celestial Canada, ULC, also has a Registered Retirement Employee Savings Plan for those employees residing in Canada. Employees of Hain Celestial Canada who meet eligibility requirements may participate in that plan.amounts are not significant to the consolidated financial statements.


17.18.    SEGMENT INFORMATION
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company reorganized its reporting structure in a manner that resulted in a change to its operating and reportable segments.
The change resulted from the Company's international expansion and was primarily driven by the acquisition of The Daniels Group in October 2011. The Company previously had one operating and reportable segment. OurCompany’s operations are now organized and managed by geography, and are comprised of fourin five operating segments: United States, United Kingdom, Hain Pure Protein, Canada and Europe. The United States, and the United Kingdom and Hain Pure Protein are nowcurrently reportable segments, while Canada and Europe do not currently meet the quantitative thresholds for reporting and are therefore combined and reported as “Rest of World.”


66


Net sales and operating profit are the primary measures used by ourthe Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. OurThe CODM is the Company'sCompany’s Chief Executive Officer. Expenses related to certain centralized administration functions that are not specifically related to an operating segment are included in “Corporate and other.” Corporate and other expenses are comprised mainly of the compensation and related expenses of certain of the Company'sCompany’s senior executive officers and other selected employees who perform duties related to ourthe entire enterprise, as well as expenses for certain professional fees, facilities, and other items which benefit the Company as a whole. Additionally, acquisition related expenses, restructuring, impairment and restructuringintegration charges are included in "Corporate“Corporate and other." Expenses that are managed centrally but can be attributed to a segment, such as employee benefits and certain facility costs, are principally allocated based on headcount.reasonable allocation methods. Certain recall and factory start-up costs incurred in the United States and Europe segments that were included in “Corporate and other” in the prior year have been reclassified to their respective segments to conform to the current year presentation. Assets are reviewed by the CODM on a consolidated basis and are not reported by operating segment.


85



The following tables set forth financial information about each of the Company'sCompany’s reportable segments. Prior period information has been recast to conform to the current year presentation. Transactions between reportable segments were insignificant for all periods presented.
Fiscal Years ended June 30,Fiscal Years ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Net Sales: (1)
          
United States$991,626
 $910,095
 $722,211
$1,367,388
 $1,282,175
 $1,095,867
United Kingdom192,352
 39,284
 31,304
735,996
 637,454
 420,408
Hain Pure Protein358,582
 
 
Rest of World194,269
 159,167
 136,492
226,549
 233,982
 218,408
$1,378,247
 $1,108,546
 $890,007
$2,688,515
 $2,153,611
 $1,734,683
          
Operating Income:          
United States$149,791
 $130,155
 $98,672
$199,901
 $205,864
 $177,352
United Kingdom9,690
 (4,844) (6,053)46,222
 52,661
 31,069
Hain Pure Protein26,479
 
 
Rest of World13,347
 9,787
 8,653
16,438
 16,931
 18,671
$172,828
 $135,098
 $101,272
$289,040
 $275,456
 $227,092
Corporate and other (2)
(21,300) (23,924) (21,183)(51,295) (47,719) (52,780)
$151,528
 $111,174
 $80,089
$237,745
 $227,737
 $174,312

(1)
One of our customers accounted for approximately 18%12%, 21%13%, and 21%15% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively, which were primarily related to the United States segment. No otherA second customer represents more thanaccounted for approximately 10%, 11% and 10% of our consolidated net sales.
sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, which were primarily related to the United States and United Kingdom segments.

(2)
Includes $7,974, $4,434,$8,471, $10,076 and $3,152$16,634 of acquisition related expenses, restructuring and restructuringintegration charges for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012, 2011,2015, 2014 and 2010, respectively. Of those amounts, $204 and $401 are recorded in cost of sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011, and 2010,2013, respectively. Corporate and other also includes reductionsexpense of $280 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, a net reduction of expense of $14,627 and $4,177$3,616 for the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 20122014, and 2011, respectively,expense of $2,336 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, related to net reversalsadjustments of the carrying value of contingent consideration.
Additionally, a non-cash impairment charge of $5,510 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 related to a United Kingdom indefinite-lived intangible asset is also included in Corporate and other.

The Company’s sales by product category are as follows:
Fiscal Year ended June 30,Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2012 2011 20102015 2014 2013
Grocery$935,136
 $688,097
 $593,393
$1,765,540
 $1,669,208
 $1,286,377
Protein358,582
 
 
Snacks209,319
 196,390
 94,828
302,093
 249,033
 220,452
Tea103,950
 99,120
 90,508
120,707
 115,593
 110,819
Personal Care109,907
 105,649
 92,769
141,593
 119,777
 117,035
Other (1)
19,935
 19,290
 18,509
Total$1,378,247
 $1,108,546
 $890,007
$2,688,515
 $2,153,611
 $1,734,683

(1)The “other” category in the above table includes, but is not limited to, sales in product categories such as fresh prepared foods. Sales of each of these categories and in the aggregate were less than 10% of total sales in each fiscal year.


6786




The Company'sCompany’s long-lived assets, which primarily represent net property, plant and equipment, by geographic area are as follows:
June 30,
2012
 June 30,
2011
June 30,
2015
 June 30,
2014
United States$130,522
 $136,261
$151,450
 $139,919
Canada11,607
 12,196
11,386
 9,694
United Kingdom54,240
 27,911
195,131
 198,505
Continental Europe15,482
 12,807
Europe22,451
 27,746
$211,851
 $189,175
$380,418
 $375,864



18.    DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS19.    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During the third quarter of fiscal 2012,On July 24, 2015, the Company madeacquired Formatio Beratungs- und Beteiligungs GmbH and its subsidiaries (“Mona”), a leader in plant-based foods and beverages with facilities in Germany and Austria. Mona offers a wide range of organic and natural products under the decisionJoya® and Happy® brands, including soy, oat, rice and nut based drinks as well as plant-based yogurts, desserts, creamers, tofu and private label products, sold to sell its private-label chilled ready meals ("CRM") businessleading retailers in Europe, primarily in Austria and Germany and eastern European countries. Consideration in the United Kingdom, which was acquired in October 2011 as parttransaction consisted of cash totaling €22,400 (approximately $24,562 at the transaction date exchange rate) and 240,207 shares of the acquisition of Daniels. The sale of the CRM business was completed on August 20, 2012. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company made the decision to dispose of its sandwich business, including the Daily BreadTM brand name, in the United Kingdom. The sale of sandwich business is expected to be completed during fiscal 2013. Operating results for the CRM business, which have beenCompany’s common stock valued at $16,308. Also included in the Company's consolidated financial statements foracquisition was the period subsequent to the October 2011 acquisition, and the sandwich business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Summarized resultsassumption of our discontinued operations are as follows:
 Fiscal Year ended June 30,
 2012 2011 2010
Net sales$73,743
 $21,711
 $27,330
Impairment charges$(14,880) $
 $
Operating loss$(16,822) $(4,437) $(8,942)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax$(14,989) $(3,989) $(9,572)

In connection with the decisions to dispose of the CRM and sandwich businesses, the Company completed an impairment test and determined that certain long-lived assets related to the businesses were impaired.net debt totaling €15,951. The Company also allocated acash portion of the goodwill recordedpurchase price was funded with borrowings under our Credit Agreement. Mona will be included in its United Kingdom reporting unit to the discontinued operations and tested that goodwill for impairment. The fair value calculations were based on offering prices to purchase the businesses and expectations about future cash flows. The following represents a summary of the impairment charges recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 related to our discontinued operations.
Customer relationships$1,756
Tradenames8,541
Goodwill2,433
Cumulative currency translation adjustment recognized2,150
Total impairment charges$14,880

The major classes of assets and liabilities of the CRM and sandwich businesses are presented in the following table. As of June 30, 2012, all assets and liabilities have been classified as current in the consolidated balance sheet as the sales have or are expected to occur within the next twelve months.

68


 June 30,
2012
 June 30,
2011
Receivables$12,379
 $3,545
Inventory5,331
 359
Other assets4,089
 815
Property, plant and equipment6,850
 
Intangible assets1,449
 15,540
Total assets of businesses held for sale$30,098
 $20,259
    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$12,012
 $4,413
Deferred taxes1,324
 996
Total liabilities of businesses held for sale$13,336
 $5,409

Europe operating segment.


6987




Item 9.         Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.


Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, our management has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have reviewedof the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this review, these officerson the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.report.



Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and boardBoard of directorsDirectors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of the published financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company acquired the Daniels GroupBelvedere International, Inc. (“Belvedere”) on October 25, 2011February 20, 2015 and Cully & Sully LimitedEK Holdings, Inc. on April 27, 2012 (collectively, the "acquired businesses"March 4, 2015 (“Empire”). We have excluded these acquired businessesBelvedere and Empire from our assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012.2015. The acquired businesses accounted for 20.44.1 percent of our total assets and 5.6 percent of our total net assets as of June 30, 20122015, and 10.62.2 percent of both our consolidatedrevenues and net sales and 9.0 percent of our income from continuing operations for the fiscal year then ended.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012. In making this2015. Management’s assessment management used thewas based on criteria set forthestablished in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee onof Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework.(2013 framework) (the COSO criteria).

Based on ourthis assessment, we believethe Company’s management concluded that as of June 30, 2012,2015, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.effective.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 20122015 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm who also audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Ernst & Young’s attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting follows.


7088




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Stockholders and Board of Directors of
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”)Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012,2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). The Company’sHain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the Daniels GroupBelvedere International Inc. (“Belvedere”), acquired on October 25, 2011February 20, 2015, and Cully & Sully LimitedEK Holdings, Inc. (“Empire”) acquired on April 27, 2012,March 4, 2015, which are included in the fiscal 20122015 consolidated financial statements of the CompanyThe Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries and constituted 20.44.1 percent of total assets, as5.6 percent of June 30, 2012net assets, and 10.62.2 percent of consolidatedrevenues and net sales and 9.0 percent of the income, from continuing operationsrespectively, for the fiscal year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the CompanyThe Hain Celestial Group, Inc. also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the Daniels GroupBelvedere and Cully & Sully Limited.Empire.

In our opinion, the CompanyThe Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012,2015, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 20122015 and 2011,2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended June 30, 20122015 of the CompanyThe Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries and our report dated August 29, 201221, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ ErnstERNST & YoungYOUNG LLP


Jericho, New York
August 29, 201221, 2015


7189



Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



Item 9B.     Other Information

Not applicable.


90



PART III


Item 10, “Directors,10.        Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.


Item 11, “Executive11.        Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.


Item 12, “Security12.        Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” and Item 14, “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” have been omitted from this report inasmuch as the Company will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered

The information required by this report a definitiveitem is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 20122015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company at which meetingto be filed with the stockholders will vote upon the electionSEC within 120 days of the directors. This information in such Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.


Item 13.        Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.


Item 14.        Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.



91




PART IV


Item 15.        Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) (1)     
(a)(1)
Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statements of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. are filed as part of this report under Part II, Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 20122015 and 20112014
Consolidated Statements of Income - Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity - Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2)     List of Financial Statement Schedules

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (Schedule II)

(3)     List of Exhibits

Exhibit
Number
(a)(2)
Description
3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration
Financial Statement on Form S-4 (Commission File No. 333-33830) filedSchedules. The following financial statement schedule should be read in conjunction with the Commission on April 24, 2000).
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, of the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 22, 2010).

72


4.1Specimen of common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Commission File No. 333-33830) filed with the Commission on April 24, 2000).
4.2Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2006, by and among the Company and the several purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 4, 2006).
4.3Form of Senior Note under Note Purchase Agreement dated as of May 2, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the Company'sthis Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, filed with the Commission on September 13, 2006).
10.1Credit Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2010, by and among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Capital One, N.A., as Syndication Agents, HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and First Pioneer Farm Credit, ACA , as Documentation Agents, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 9, 2010).
10.1.1(a)
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2012, by and among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Capital One, N.A., as Syndication Agents, HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and First Pioneer Farm Credit, ACA , as Documentation Agents, and the lenders party thereto.
10.2Amended and Restated 1994 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex F to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus contained in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Commission File No. 333-33830) filed with the Commission on April 24, 2000).
10.31996 Directors Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement dated November 4, 1996).
10.42000 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement dated February 18, 2009).
10.5Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 18, 2011).
10.62010-2014 Executive Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 25, 2009).
10.7Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated July 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, filed with the Commission on November 14, 2003), as amended as described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 3, 2006.
10.7.1Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 7, 2009).
10.7.2Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated as of July 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on July 2, 2009).
10.7.3Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated as of June 30, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on July 6, 2012).
10.8Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Commission on February 9, 2005).
10.9Form of Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Commission on February 9, 2005).
10.10Form of Option Agreement10-K.  All other financial schedules are not required under the Company’s Amendedrelated instructions, or are not applicable and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).
10.11Form of Option Agreement with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).

73


10.12Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).
10.13Form of Restricted Stock Agreement with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).
10.14Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Award under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).
10.15Form of the Change in Control Agreements between the Company and each of Ira J. Lamel, John Carroll and Michael J. Speiller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 7, 2009).
10.16Form of the Offer Letter Amendments between the Company and each of Ira J. Lamel, John Carroll and Michael J. Speiller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 7, 2009).
10.17Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Company’s 2000 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 17, 2009).
10.18Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Award under the Company’s 2000 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 17, 2009).
10.19Form of Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2010).
10.20Form of Option Agreement under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2010).
10.21Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2010, between the Company and certain investment funds managed by Carl C. Icahn (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 7, 2010).
10.22Form of Restricted Stock Agreement with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (2011-2012 Long Term Incentive Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2011).
10.23Form of Restricted Stock Agreement with the Company’s non-CEO executive officers under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (2011-2012 Long Term Incentive Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2011).
10.24Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated as of July 3, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(a) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 6, 2012).
21.1therefore have been omitted.(a)
Subsidiaries of Company.
23.1(a)
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Ernst & Young LLP.
31.1(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
31.2(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
32.1(a)
Certification by CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2(a)
Certification by CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

74


101*
The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vi) Financial Statement Schedule

(a) - Filed herewith
* - Furnished, not filed



75



The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column B Column C Column D Column E
   Additions       Additions    
 
Balance at
beginning of
period
 
Charged to
costs and
expenses
 
Charged to
other accounts -
describe (1)
 Deductions - describe (2) 
Balance of
end of
period
 
Balance at
beginning of
period
 
Charged to
costs and
expenses
 
Charged to
other accounts -
describe (i)
 
Deductions - describe (ii)
 
Balance at
end of
period
Year Ended June 30, 2012:          
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015:          
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,230
 $546
 $969
 $(84) $2,661
 $1,586
 $791
 $20
 $(1,501) $896
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets $6,402
 $1,064
 $
 $(491) $6,975
 $9,830
 $214
 $
 $(989) $9,055
Year Ended June 30, 2011:          
          
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014:          
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,574
 $249
 $
 $(593) $1,230
 $2,564
 $51
 $330
 $(1,359) $1,586
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets $7,041
 $(1,166) $
 $527
 $6,402
 $10,456
 $1,466
 $
 $(2,092) $9,830
Year Ended June 30, 2010:          
          
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013:          
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,175
 $484
 $
 $(85) $1,574
 $2,661
 $67
 $
 $(164) $2,564
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets $7,701
 $(365) $
 $(295) $7,041
 $11,183
 $(1,160) $
 $433
 $10,456
(1)    Represents the allowance for doubtful accounts of the business acquired during the fiscal year
(2)    
(i)Represents the allowance for doubtful accounts of the business acquired during the fiscal year
(ii)Amounts written off and changes in exchange rates


(a)(3)     Exhibits. The exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are listed on the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference.



7692



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
  THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC.
   
Date:August 29, 201221, 2015
/s/    IRWINIrwin D. SIMON        
Simon
  
Irwin D. Simon,
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
 
Date:August 29, 201221, 2015
/s/    IRAStephen J. LAMEL        
Smith
  
IraStephen J. Lamel,Smith,
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer




7793





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
     
/s/ IRWINIrwin D. SIMONSimon 
President, Chief Executive Officer and
   Chairman of the Board of Directors
 August 29, 201221, 2015
Irwin D. Simon    
     
/s/ IRAStephen J. LAMELSmith 
Executive Vice President and
   Chief Financial Officer
 August 29, 201221, 2015
IraStephen J. LamelSmith    
     
/s/ MICHAEL J. SPEILLERRoss Weiner Senior
Vice President-FinancePresident and
   Chief Accounting Officer
 August 29, 201221, 2015
Michael J. SpeillerRoss Weiner    
     
/s/ BARRY J. ALPERINRichard C. Berke Director August 29, 2012
Barry J. Alperin
/s/ RICHARD C. BERKEDirectorAugust 29, 201221, 2015
Richard C. Berke    
     
/s/ JACK FUTTERMANAndrew R. Heyer Director August 29, 201221, 2015
Jack FuttermanAndrew R. Heyer
DirectorAugust 21, 2015
Raymond W. Kelly    
     
/s/ MARINA HAHNRoger Meltzer Director August 29, 2012
Marina Hahn
/s/ BRETT ICAHNDirectorAugust 29, 2012
Brett Icahn
/s/ ROGER MELTZERDirectorAugust 29, 201221, 2015
Roger Meltzer    
     
/s/ SCOTTScott M. O'NEILO’Neil Director August 29, 201221, 2015
Scott M. O'NeilO’Neil    
     
/s/ DAVID SCHECHTERAdrianne Shapira Director August 29, 201221, 2015
David SchechterAdrianne Shapira    
     
/s/ LEWIS D. SCHILIROLawrence S. Zilavy Director August 29, 2012
Lewis D. Schiliro
/s/ LAWRENCE S. ZILAVYDirectorAugust 29, 201221, 2015
Lawrence S. Zilavy    


94



EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2(b) of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 26, 2014).

3.2
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2(a) of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 26, 2014).

4.1
Specimen of common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Commission File No. 333-33830) filed with the Commission on April 24, 2000).

4.2
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2006, by and among the Company and the several purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 4, 2006).

4.3
Form of Senior Note under Note Purchase Agreement dated as of May 2, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, filed with the Commission on September 13, 2006).

10.1
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2014, by and among The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, as Global Swingline Lender, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank, N.A. and Farm Credit East, ACA, as Documentation Agents, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 18, 2014).

10.2
2000 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement dated February 18, 2009).

10.3
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).

10.4
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 2015-2019 Executive Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).

10.5
Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated July 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, filed with the Commission on November 14, 2003), as amended as described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 3, 2006.

10.5.1
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 7, 2009).

10.5.2
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated as of July 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on July 2, 2009).

10.5.3
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated as of June 30, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on July 6, 2012).

10.5.4
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated November 2, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 2, 2012).


95



10.5.5
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon dated September 23, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2014).

10.6
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Commission on February 9, 2005).

10.7
Form of Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Commission on February 9, 2005).

10.8
Form of Option Agreement under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).

10.9
Form of Option Agreement with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).

10.10
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).

10.11
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).

10.12
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Award under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008).

10.13
Form of the Change in Control Agreement between the Company and John Carroll (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 7, 2009).

10.14
Form of the Offer Letter Amendments between the Company and John Carroll (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 7, 2009).

10.15
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Company’s 2000 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 17, 2009).

10.16
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Award under the Company’s 2000 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 17, 2009).

10.17
Form of Change in Control Agreement between the Company and each of Denise M. Faltischek and Steven J. Smith (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2010).

10.18
Form of Option Agreement under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2010).

10.19
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (2011-2012 Long Term Incentive Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2011).


96



10.20
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement with the Company’s non-CEO executive officers under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Stock Award Plan (2011-2012 Long Term Incentive Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2011).

10.21
Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and Irwin D. Simon, dated as of July 3, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(a) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 6, 2012).

21.1Subsidiaries of Company.
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Ernst & Young LLP.
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

32.1
Certification by CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2
Certification by CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101
The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vii) Financial Statement Schedule.





7897