UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
______________________
FORM 10-K
______________________
| x | ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112013 |
| o | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the transition period from ______ to ______ |
Commission file number: 0-12627
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of Small Business Issuer as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | | 87-0407858 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
| | 100 W. Broadway,
2790 Skypark Drive, Suite 650105 Long BeachTorrance, California 9080290505
| |
| | (Address of principal executive offices) | |
| | | |
| | (310) 641-4234 | |
| | Issuer’s telephone number: | |
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None.
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and, (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þo No oþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein and, will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 20112013 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $6,533,256.$5,339,000.
The outstanding number of shares of common stock as of March 13, 2012November 3, 2014 was 285,062,812.339,187,545.
Documents incorporated by reference: None
Form 10-K
| | | | Page |
| | | |
| PART I | |
| | | |
| BUSINESS. | 1 |
| RISK FACTORS. | 11 |
| UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS | 20 |
ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES. | 20 |
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. | 21 |
| | 21 |
| | |
| PART II | |
| | | |
| | 21 |
| | 23 |
| | 23 |
| | 28 |
| | 28 |
| | 28 |
| | 29 |
| | |
| PART III | |
| | |
| | 29 |
| | 31 |
| | 35 |
| | 36 |
| | 37 |
| | |
| PART IV | |
| | |
| | 38 |
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report, including any documents which may be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report, contains “Forward-Looking Statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “Forward-Looking Statements” for purposes of these provisions, including our plans to cultivate, produce and market non-food based feedstock for applications in the biofuels market, any projections of revenues or other financial items, any statements of the plans and objectives of management for future operations, any statements concerning proposed new products or services, any statements regarding the timing and size of Jatropha or Camelina harvests, any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance, and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. All Forward-Looking Statements included in this document are made as of the date hereof and are based on information available to us as of such date. We assume no obligation to update any Forward-Looking Statement. In some cases, Forward-Looking Statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes,” “estimates,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the Forward-Looking Statements contained herein are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations or any of the Forward-Looking Statements will prove to be correct, and actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in the Forward-Looking Statements. Future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any Forward-Looking Statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, including any other factors referred to in our press releases and reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All subsequent Forward-Looking Statements attributable to the company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Additional factors that may have a direct bearing on our operating results are described under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.
Introductory Comment
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “our company” refer to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation that was formerly a Utah corporation known as Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and prior to its name change in 2008, was Medical Discoveries, Inc., and, unless the context indicates otherwise, also includes all of this company's U.S. and foreign wholly-owned subsidiaries through which this company conducts certain of its operations. To the extent applicable, depending on the context of the disclosure, the terms ““we,“we,” “us,” “our,” and “our company” may also include GCE Mexico I, LLC (“GCE Mexico”) a Delaware limited liability company, in which we own 50% of the common membership interests.interests, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Sustainable Oils, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, G.E.H. Dominicana, S.R.L., a company formed under the laws of the Dominican Republic, Globales Energia Renovables S DE RL DE CV as well as our other subsidiaries.
Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. is not related to, or affiliated in any manner with “Global Clean Energy, Inc.” Readers are cautioned to confirm the entity that they are evaluating or in which they are making an investment before completing any such investment.
Overview
Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. is a U.S. basedU.S.-based, multi-national, energy agri-business focused on the development of non-food based bio-fuel feedstocks.bio-feedstocks. We have full service in-house development and operations capabilities, which we provideprovides support to our own Jatrophabiofuel energy farms and to third parties. With international experience and capabilities in eco-friendly bio-fuelbiofuel feedstock management, cultivation, production and distribution, we believe that we are well suited to scale our existing business.
Since 2007, our business focus has been on the commercialization of oilnon-food based oilseed plants and biomass derived frombiomass. We began with the seedsdevelopment of farms growing Jatropha curcas (“Jatropha”) - a native non-edible plant indigenous to many tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world, including Mexico, the Caribbean and Central America. Jatropha treesAs a result of our acquisition on March 13, 2013 of Sustainable Oils, LLC and its assets, our biofuels operations now also includes the cultivation of Camelina sativa (“Camelina”) – an annual plant from the brassica family traditionally grown in northerly regions of the United States, Europe and Asia. We are focused on these two plant species primarily because we feel they have the potential to produce oil seed crops economically, they generally require less water and fertilizer than many conventional crops, and they can be grown on land that is not normally suitableunsuitable for thefood production of food.or is fallow or idle due to crop rotation. Both Jatropha and Camelina oil isare high-quality plant oiloils used as a direct replacementsubstitutes for fossil fuels and as feedstock for the production of high quality bio-fuels.biofuels and other bio-based products. Both crops have been tested and proven to be highly desirable feedstocks capable of being converted into ASTM approved fuels. The term “bio-fuels”“biofuels” refers to a range of biological based fuels including bio-kerosene (a.k.a bio-jet fuel) bio-diesel,biodiesel, renewable diesel, green diesel, synthetic diesel and biomass, most of which have environmental benefits that are the major driving force for their introduction.adoption. Using bio-fuelsbiofuels instead of fossil fuels reduces net emissions of carbon dioxide and other green housegreen-house gases, which are associated with global climate change. Both Jatropha and Camelina oil can also be used as a chemical feedstock to replace fossil and non-food based products that use edible oils in their manufacturing or production process. The residual material derived from the oil extraction process is called press cake,press-cake, which in the case of Jatropha is a high-quality biomass that has been proven and tested as a replacement for a number of fossil basedfossil-based feedstocks, fossil fuels and other high value products such as renewable charcoal, fertilizers, and animal feed. Camelina press-cake or meal is high in Omega3 and has already been approved by the FDA and sold by Sustainable Oils as a livestock (animal) feed or enhancement in the United States.
Our business plan and current principal business activities include the planting, cultivation, harvesting and processing of Jatrophathese oil seed plants to generate plant based oils and biomass for use as replacements for fossil fuels and other high value products. Our strategy is to leverage our agriculture and energy knowledge, experience and capabilities through the following means:
| · | Own and operate Jatrophabiofuel energy farms for our own account. |
| · | Own, operate and manage threefarms in a joint venture (JV) with either strategic partners or financial investors. We currently own two Jatropha farms located in Mexico under such joint ownership arrangements: The first farm comprises 5,149 acres; the second farm is approximately 5,100 acres,arrangements, and thea third farm is 5,557 acres. The first two farms have been fully planted, andin Mexico that we acquired for the first farm is expected to produce significant quantitiespurpose of Jatropha in 2012. We anticipate that second farm will begin producing Jatropha seeds in 2012-2013. We expect to commence developing the third farm aftercultivation, where we achieve consistent, significant yields in the first farm.are currently cultivating an annual oil seed crop. |
| · | Contract with third party farmers (such as wheat and barley farmers) for the cultivation of Camelina sativa on their farms in the United States, Latin America and Europe. |
| · | Produce and sell certified Camelina seeds that are based upon our patented, high-yielding elite varieties to farmers in the United states and internationally. |
| · | Provide Jatrophaenergy farm development, advisory and management services to third partyparties, including to non-farming industrial companies who have a demand for biofuels, to owners of Jatropha farms. In 2011 we provided advisory services for proposed Jatrophabiofuel energy farms, locatedand to non-energy crop farmers looking to utilize energy crops in Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, South America and Africa, and we will seek to expand this initiative in the current fiscal year.rotation or inter-cropped with their existing crops. |
| · | Provide advisory services to farmers wishing to certify their farms under international sustainability or carbon certification standards, specifically the Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels (RSB) and Gold Standard Verified Emission Reductions (GS-VERs) |
| · | Provide turnkey Franchise Operationsfranchise operations for individuals and/or companies that wish to establish Jatrophapurpose specific energy farms in suitable geographical areas. |
InThe development of agricultural-based energy projects, like plant oil and related biomass, may produce carbon credits through the sequestration (storing) of carbon and the displacement of fossil-based fuels. Accordingly, in addition to generating revenues from the sale of non-food based plant oils and biomass we are seekingand related advisory and management services, our goal is to generate and monetize carbon credits from thecertify our farms, we own and manage. Under the original 1997
Kyoto Protocol, a worldwide carbon credit trading market was established where regulated entities can purchase credits generated in non-developed countries in order to meet internationally binding CO2 emissions reduction targets. The compliance carbon market remains in a state of considerable uncertainty after the climate summit in Durban, South Africa in 2011 did not produce any binding, long-term emission reduction commitments. In addition to the market established under the Kyoto Protocol, there are other voluntary carbon certification registries that allow emission reducing projectspractical, to generate and monetize carbon credits. A voluntary credit, in some instances, can command a premium to the Kyoto (certified) credits. Under the guidance of an industry leading carbon credit development firm, we have commenced the certification process necessary to sell carbon credits. Based on their extensive feasibility study, our project’s ability to successfully generate credits has been confirmed; however, we have not yet registered credits or made any credit sales.
We continue to expand our research and development activities concerned with achieving sustainable, commercial yields of Jatropha seeds, enhancing the plant characteristics, reducing operating costs and improving our production capacity and efficiency. Specifically, our research activities focus on (i) optimizing genetic development (i.e., the quality of the Jatropha plants), (ii) optimizing agronomic development and plant nutrition (i.e., soil conditions optimal for Jatropha cultivation), and (iii) improving agricultural technologies relating to the care and custody of the Jatropha plant, and the processing of resulting products. We continue our research and development efforts toward the improved commercialization of Jatropha at our research and test facility in Tizimin, Mexico.See, “Business--Carbon Credits,” below.
Organizational History
This company was originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Utah on November 20, 1991. Until 2007, the Company was a developmental-stage bio-pharmaceutical company engaged in the research, validation, and development of two drug candidates. In 2007, the Company decided to change its business and focus its efforts and resources on the emerging alternative energy fuelsmarket. Accordingly, on September 7, 2007, we acquired certain trade secrets, know-how, business plans and relationships relevant to the cultivation and production of Jatropha. In 2008 we changed our name to “Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.” to reflect our energy agricultural business. In November 2009, we sold our remaining legacy bio-pharmaceutical assets to Curadis Gmbh (see, “Legacy Bio-pharmaceutical Assets,” below).
On July 19, 2010, we changed the state of our incorporation from Utah to Delaware. Our principal executive offices are located at 100 W. Broadway, Suite 650, Long Beach,2790 Skypark Drive, Torrance, California, Los Angeles County, California 90802,90505, and our current telephone number at that address is (310) 641-GCEH (4234). We maintain a website at: www.gceholdings.com. Our annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and other information related to this company are available on our website as soon as we electronically file those documents with, or otherwise furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Sustainable Oils subsidiary also maintains a website at www.susoils.com. Our Internet websitewebsites and the information contained therein, or connected thereto, are not and are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Developments During 20112013 and Part of 2014
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011,2013 and through the date of this Annual Report, we achieved the following milestones in the development of this company:company, which developments are further discussed below:
| · | We increased revenues by over 50%;acquired assets and intellectual properties necessary to develop and commercialize Camelina sativa as a biofuels feedstock; and |
| · | We continuedcompleted the development of our research farm in the Caribbean , which we are using to improve our balance sheet by removing legacy liabilitiesassess the growth of multiple varieties of Jatropha plants and, improving revenues, we have posted a profit for fiscal year 2011more recently, to explore the production of $271,000;Camelina throughout the Caribbean, and; |
| · | We acquired an additional 5,557 acresobtained financing to develop a Certified Seed Nursery in Mexico, thereby increasing our farm acreage by over 54%;the Caribbean to produce production seed for the future development of commercial bio-fuel operations in the region, and; |
| · | We committedsignificantly expanded the amount and type of management and advisory services we provide to acquiring a small farm in the Dominican Republic, which we are using as a research farm to test and research the growth of multiple varieties of Jatropha plants in the Dominican Republic;partners and/or third parties, and; |
· | We increased our full time employees by over 30% to 488; |
| · | We increased our asset base by approximately $5.1 million, an increase of over 46%, while increasing our liabilities by less than 34%. We plan to continue to invest in assets and expand our farming operations; |
· | We reduced our general and administrative expenses by more than 21% compared to 2010; |
· | We raised an additional $7.9$1.6 million in project equityof financing for our jointly owned Mexico Jatropha farms and financing;for this company’s other bio-fuel and |
· | We continued to supply test quantities of Jatropha oil to Aeropuertos y Serviceios Auxiliares, the Mexican National Airport authority, to be converted by Honeywell’s UOP division, into bio-jet fuel for commercial jet fuels. This is part of an international bio-jet initiative. other operating purposes. |
Business Operations
We are a multi-national energy agri-business with development and operations activities concentrated primarily in the State of Yucatan, Mexico.capabilities. We maintain in-house staff for the development, management, cultivation, production and distribution of plant-based feedstock used to offset fossil fuels. Our business plan and current principal business activities include the planting, cultivation, harvesting and processing of Jatrophanon-food based plants to generate seed oils and biomass for use in the bio-fuelsbiofuels industry, including the production of bio-jet, bio-dieselbiodiesel and green diesel as well as alternative feedstocks for fertilizers, animal feed and for green chemicals and other products which can use non-edible oils to replace edible oils.
Our vision and strategy is to grow and expandrenewable chemicals. As a co-product of our farming and production processes, we will also produce feedstocks and product streams that substitute and displace fossil- and edible oil-based inputs in many industrial processes, including fertilizer, paint and fossil fuel production.
Since the inception of bio-fuels business in 2007, our strategy has been to be a diversified bio-energy feedstock provider by growing and expanding our energy farming and processing business to include numerous bio-based feedstock crops. We plan to expand to the level where economies of scale and our methods of operations allow us to generate significant revenues and profits without the need for any government subsidies. The processes and procedures we employ to plant and cultivate Jatrophaour crops for our business are being continually refined in order to produce “best practices” for Jatrophaenergy farm operations. By focusing on improving our Jatropha operationsfarming practices and the technology we apply to our operations, we plan to operate economically, environmentally and socially sustainable Jatrophaenergy farms (i.e. without use of subsidies), which can replace fossil fuels or food based feedstocks at a production cost below $42 per barrel or $1.00 per gallon.the market price of their alternatives. By continuing to invest in leading-edge genetic, agronomic (soil) and horticulture technology research and development, and acquiring or strategically aligning with companies that possess leading-edge technology in plant genetics, we expectwill continue to develop high-yielding Jatropha treesenergy crops that deliver renewable energy feedstock into the market at very competitive prices.
Our strategy is to leverage our farming and energy knowledge, experience and capabilities through the following means:
Company Farms. Previously, we operated farms that are classified as “Company farms” in Belize and in Mexico. Both were developed as research and test farms, and seed supply farms. We have since centralized and consolidated these efforts at our larger commercial farms in Mexico, where our field research station is located. This allows us to centralize our scientific research and make more efficient use of our plant and soil scientists and facilities. As our commercial farms in Mexico have expanded, it is more economical to perform these functions at our commercial farms and we have the additional benefit of applying our research to our commercial farming practices. We have, therefore, reclassified our Belizean farm as an investment property and are currently attempting to sell that farm.
Research Farms. In 20112013, we committed to the developmentcompleted land preparation and operation of a researchplanting, and began operations on an energy farm in the Dominican Republic.Caribbean. This farm will beis being used to test and research the growth of multiple varieties of Jatropha inand other oil seed plants, and to adapt them to the Dominican Republiclocal conditions for future commercial farm expansion in the Carribean region. We are also using this farm to perform a full trial of Camelina production in the Carribean, and are in the process of expanding this research farm to produce locally adapted Jatropha and Camelina seeds of the best varieties for this growing region. As our business progresses, we will continue to work on plant genetics, soil science and cultivation practices to improve short-, medium- and long-term yields.
Partnership Farms Owned Via Joint Ventures. We currently own three farms through joint venture arrangements with a third party financing sources.source. Our first farm in Mexico is our largest farm with(which we refer to as Asideros 1), consisting of approximately 5,149 acres of land near Tizimin, in the Yucatan peninsula inPeninsula of Mexico. The second farm (which we refer to as Asideros 2), consisting of approximately 5,100 acres, is located adjacent to the first farm. Both farmsIn 2011, we acquired our third farm (which we refer to as Asideros 3), consisting of approximately 5,557 acres, that is located approximately five miles from the first two Mexican farms. Asideros 1 and 2 have been previously prepared and planted with over 6.0 million Jatropha trees. AllAsideros 1 was planted with more than 20 varieties of Jatropha trees from around the world. In part because of this diversity, the seed production capabilities of Asideros 1 are uncertain and have not met initial seed production estimates. As a result, we are currently focusing our operational efforts on Asideros 2, as this farm has more of the Jatropha varieties that, we believe, have the greatest potential for production. We plan to utilize the germplasm selections from some high-yield varieties growing on Asideros 2 or from our other breeding programs, to improve the varieties grown on Asideros 1. In 2014, we began cultivation on a portion of Asideros 3, with an annual oil seed crop, to determine the best agronomics and cultivation practices and to confirm yields. To date, we have acquired all the permits and certifications necessary to develop Asideros 3 as an energy farm but have not yet commenced commercial scale operations on that farm. On the first two farms, all the necessary roads and other support infrastructure have been developed to support the operations of the first two farms. The first, and older, farm is expected to produce significant quantities of Jatropha seeds in 2012.all necessary operations. The Jatropha trees in the second farmon Asideros 2 are expected to gradually mature to become fruit bearing trees commencing in late 2012trees. Sales revenues generated from Asideros 1 and 2013. Sales from these two farms2 to date have primarily consisted of the sale of Jatropha seeds for propagation, the production and sale of biomass used infor specialty purposes, and limited quantities of oil and biomass for testing by potential customers.
In 2012, we acquired our third farm, consistingFor additional information regarding our joint venture operations, see “Jatropha Farming Operations—Tizimin--Mexico Farm,” below.
Jatropha Farm Development and Management Services. The company currently providesWe continue to provide development and management services to unaffiliated companies and individuals who are planning the development and implementation of Jatropha farms.energy farms domestically and internationally. These services are provided on a fee-for-service basis and generally begin with feasibility studies, and are often followed by management contracts that provide us with the ability to develop and operate these farms on a go-forward basis. During the past twofour fiscal years, we have provided such advisory and management services for new Jatropha farm operations based in Mexico, the Dominican Republic,Caribbean, South America, Africa, and the United States. Our plan is to increaseWe have increased the level of these development and management services that we provide as a means of generating near-term revenue and profits, and to allow usservices. The fees from these agreements will be used to fund corporate operations and the continued expansion of our technical services team.delivery platform.
Contract Jatropha Farms. Our contract farming operations will focus on the production of Camelina. We havewill continue with the relationships established a strategy and the processesby Sustainable Oils, which are expected to allow us to quickly expand contract the farming operationoperations on non-company owned farms, which are located nearfarms. Under the existing contract farm arrangement, we sell our core farms,certified Camelina seeds to third party farmers. The farmers who own or rent the land and have skills, labor and equipment to properly farm the land. We will farm their own land under our direct supervision, utilizing ouralso provide these farmers with previously proven “best practices processes”practices” for JatrophaCamelina cultivation and with the support of our technical services team of agri-business professionals. The majority of the farmers that grow the Camelina plants are expected to enter into contracts to sell the Camelina seeds harvested from their farms to us, following the harvest (usually 90-100 days after planting). This programprocedure will allow us to quickly expand our business while still ensuring success. We have not yet entered intowithout the need to acquire land or any agreements under this format.of the machinery, equipment or personnel to operate large farming operations.
Franchise Jatropha Farms. The Company hasWe have established a program for offering franchise operations for Jatropha Farms.farms. This program consists of all of the necessary programs and procedures to establish and operate a profitable Jatropha farm profitably.farm. The program also entails establishing and providing methods to obtain all necessary equipment and supplies. The Company is in discussions with several parties, but as of this filing, noTo date, we have not entered into any such franchise agreements have been executed.agreements.
Our core activities consist of planting, cultivating, harvesting and processing of Jatropha feedstocknon-food based oil seeds to generate seed oilsliquid and biomass for usesolid feedstocks used in the bio-fuelsbiofuels industry and other high value, industrial processed which use fossil basedenergy intensive industries where fossil- or plant basedplant-based oils are used as their feedstock, including the production of bio-dieselprimary feedstocks. These industries include those that produce biodiesel and renewable diesel, renewable jet, and other high value bio-fuels.biofuels and renewable chemicals.
We have identified the Jatropha curcas plantand Camelina sativa plants as our primary feedstockfeedstocks for producing bio-dieselbiodiesel, other biofuels including renewable diesel and other bio-fuelsrenewable jet fuel and renewable chemicals, but we continue to research and test other plant species. The seeds from these plants contain oil with beneficial properties for the production of biofuels or as direct, drop-in replacements for fossil fuels. We plan to utilize the seed oils for producing biofuels and bio-chemicals, the presscake (the residue of oil seeds when the oil has been pressed out) from Jatropha as a solid fuel, and the presscake from Camelina as a high value animal feed. The FDA has approved the use of Camelina presscake or meal as a protein-rich animal feed for cattle, poultry or swine. We currently use the fruit shell (hull) from the Jatropha fruit as a fertilizer to reduce our fertilizer input and costs.
The Jatropha plant is a perennial tree that produces an inedible fruit withcontaining large seeds containingwith a high percentage of high qualityhigh-quality inedible oil. The entire fruit, includingCamelina is in the mustard seed family and produces small, very high oil content seeds has excellent properties necessary forthat, like Jatropha, are well suited to the production of bio-fuels or as a direct replacementrenewable fuels and bio-chemicals. Sustainable Oils’ Camelina oil-based jet fuel has been tested, approved and certified for fossil fuels. Our planuse in multiple military aircraft, including several combat planes and helicopters. It is among the most highly tested and approved feedstocks for renewable fuels and chemicals to utilize the entire fruit of the Jatropha plant for bio-fuel production, including the oils produced from the fruit, and the seed cake (press cake). We will utilize the fruit (hull) as a fertilizer for our trees to reduce our fertilizer costs.date.
We have identified a number of strategic locations in North America, the Caribbean, Central America and South America ideally suited to our Jatropha planting,or Camelina cultivation harvesting and processing activities.processing. These locations have been selected for a number of key strategic reasons, including proximity to large customers who require the products, close to ports for logistics purposes, relatively stable democratic governments, favorable trade agreements with the United States, low-cost land, reasonably priced labor, favorable weather conditions and acceptable soil conditions. We presently maintain farm properties in the Yucatan peninsula,Peninsula of Mexico, on which we have commenced planting Jatropha and where we conduct research and development activities focusing on plant genetics, soil sciences, plant breeding and other related activities. We also own and operate a research farm in the Caribbean which is used to acclimate various varieties to the region for future farm expansion. We also use these facilities for research that is conducted in collaboration with The Center for Sustainable Energy Farming (www.CfSEF.org ).(www.CfSEF.org). We continue to sponsor and support the research to identify and develop improved Jatropha varieties, as well as to establish ideal growing conditions in order to maximize our output of Jatropha fruit, seed oil and biomass while reducing inputs and maximizing resistance to pests and diseases. We also have executed collaboration agreements with a number of developers and researchers around the world and are in process with a number of joint research programs to test various “elite” varieties for their applicability in the Latin American market.
With the recent acquisition of Sustainable Oils, we will expand these research initiatives to include Camelina.
Our business plan also includes the further development of more efficient seed oil extraction technologies and techniques and the expansion of our seed oil extracting facility’s capacity to support our expanding farming operations. The seed oil extraction facility is used to extract the “crude Jatropha oil” (“CJO”) from the Jatropha seed, and thereafter to collect the remaining biomass for sale to interested buyers.
We anticipate that our primary focus will remain inremains the renewable feedstock oil market, and we will continue expanding our operations, primarily in the areas of planting, harvesting and sale of feedstock oilfeedstocks to end users in the energy and oil chemical industry for production of biofuels and green chemicals.bio-chemical industries. In the short term, as we developwill continue our Jatropha farmsfarm development activities and prepare for our initial large-scale harvestharvests of both Jatropha seeds, weand Camelina seeds. We expect to generate short-term revenues through the sale of Jatropha and Camelina seeds for germination, through forwardand the sale contracts for feedstockof oil, biomass and presscake (meal) as a thermal fuel or approved animal feed. We continue to pursue the sale of our oil and biomass to be produced at our facilities, through the forward saleproducts into higher value, non-fuel, specialty markets like “green chemicals,” “green plastics,” and nutraceuticals. Some of carbon offset credits and through our development and management services. We are also having active discussions with firms that havethese specialty sales could represent a non-fuel use for Jatropha oil for such things as the production of candles, “green chemicals” and “green plastics”. Although we may engage in such ancillary sales, sales for these purposes are not expected to constitute a majorsignificant source of future revenues.revenues at substantially higher profit margins than the renewable energy feedstock sales.
Our board, management, employees, partners, technical advisors and consultants are senior energy, agricultural and business professionals whothat possess extensive experience in the energy and alternative fuels market,market. The group has experience in the production of bio-fuels, in thebiofuels, renewable energy, sector in general, inand the agriculture and in general business.businesses. Accordingly, we have the resident expertise to provide development and management services to other companies regarding their bio-fuelspursuing biofuels and/or feedstock development operations,activities, on a fee for services basis. As described below, we currently provide such bio-fuelbiofuel consulting services in locations, and for parts of the business, that are not directly competitivestrategically beneficial to our existing or planned sites.sites and businesses.
Jatropha Farming Operations
Tizimin – Mexico Farm. On April 23, 2008, we entered into an agreement with six other investors affiliated with two of our largest stock holders to form GCE Mexico I, LLC as a Delaware limited liability company (“GCE Mexico”). GCE Mexico was organized to initially acquire 2,000 hectares (approximately 5,149 acres) of land, through subsidiaries, located in Tizimin, in the State of Yucatan in Mexico to be used primarily for the (i) cultivation of Jatropha curcas, (ii) the marketing and sale of the resulting fruit, seeds, or pre-processed crude Jatropha oil, whether as bio-diesel feedstock, biomass or otherwise, and (iii) the sale of carbon value, green fuel value, or renewable energy credit value (and other similar environmental attributes) derived from activities at this Jatropha farm. In March 2010, GCE Mexico acquired approximately 5,100 acres of additional land that is contiguous to our first 5,149-acre farm, and in October 2011, GCE Mexico acquired another 5,557 acres for the development of a third Jatropha farm. The third proposed Jatropha farm is located approximately five miles from our first two farms. GCE Mexico acquired each of the Jatropha farms through a Mexican subsidiary in which GCE Mexico owns a 99% interest, and we own a 1% interest.
We currently own 50% of the issued and outstanding common membership units of GCE Mexico, the limited liability company that, through its subsidiaries, owns the three Jatropha farms in Mexico. The remaining 50% in common membership units were issued to five investors affiliated with twoone of our largest stockholders.stockholders (Global Clean Energy Holdings and the other members of GCE Mexico holding the common membership units are collectively referred to as “Common Members.”) In addition, an aggregate of 1,000 preferred membership units were issued to two investors also affiliated with twoone of our largest stockholders (the “Preferred Members”). AsDuring 2013, one of March 16, 2012, the Preferred Members have contributedacquired the Membership units of the other Preferred Members and, as a result, is now the sole Preferred Member. As of November 3, 2014, the Preferred Members had provided a total of approximately $20$27 million to fundGCE Mexico for the initial investment by,purchase of the land underlying the three farms and on-going operating expenses of, GCE Mexico.for other operational purposes. It is expected that the sole Preferred MembersMember will continue to fund the ongoing operationoperations of GCE Mexico in in 2014 accordance with the approved annual budgets provided by management. This2014 budget. Additional funding is expected to continuewill be necessary until the Jatropha farms generate adequate funds to sustain operations. The Preferred Members areMember is entitled to preferential rights to cash distributions from GCE Mexico, until such time as they have received a specifiedpreferential return on their investment. As of December 31, 2011,his investment, the accrued cumulative amount of their preferred returnwhich was approximately $2.9 million.$7.4 million as of December 31, 2013.
Included in the $20approximately $27 million above,that has been provided to date by the twoPreferred Members of GCE Mexico, the Preferred Members directly funded the purchase by GCE Mexico of the land in the State of Yucatan in Mexico on which the three GCE Mexico three farms are located. The purchase of land for the three farms was funded by mortgage loans, which cumulatively had an initial principal balance of $5,110,189.$5,110,000. Each parcel of land was acquired in the name of one of GCE Mexico’s Mexican subsidiarysubsidiaries and is secured by a mortgage in favor of the Preferred Members.Member. The mortgages bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum, and interest is payable on a quarterly basis to the extent the borrower has sufficient cash flow. If the borrower does not have sufficient cash to repay the interest on a current basis, then the loan agreement states that the unpaid interest will continue to accrue and will be payable when the borrower determines that it has sufficient cash to make the interest payment. The three mortgages, including any unpaid interest, become due in April, 2018, February 2019,2020, June 2021 and October 2021.
GCE Mexico is managed under the supervision of a board of directors comprising of four members, two of whom we haveare appointed by us and two of whom were appointed by the Preferred Members.Member. However, we are the manager of the joint venture, and through our wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, we manage the day-to-day operations of GCE Mexico and the operations in Mexico. GCE Mexico reimburses us for the cost of management of the joint venture and the farms, includingwhich includes a portion of our U.S. administrative expenses that are related to those operations.
The following is a summary of certain factors relevant to an understanding of the operations of the three Mexico farms:
· | · | We planted over 20 varieties of Jatropha trees from around the world in our first Mexico farm approximately four years ago in order to determine which varieties are most suitable for commercial production. These trees are being evaluated on the basis, of among other things, the amount of fruit/seeds that they produce, their resilience to pests and diseases, their compatibility to existing soil and climate conditions, and amount of maintenance and care required to maintain the trees. The first Jatropha treesfarm has demonstrated that many of the varieties we planted onin the first farm approximately three years ago are continuingnot suitable for commercial biofuel seed production. While we have to mature, and we expect to start harvesting commercialdate harvested small quantities of Jatropha fruit from this farm, we are currently allowing the Jatropha trees in this farm to naturally grow and develop without commercial agricultural intervention to determine which trees will be retained for commercial production, which trees possess advanced attributes that will be used for breeding and which trees/areas will be replanted with the late spring of 2012. We commenced selling oil commerciallymore successful, hardy varieties in 20112014 and expect additional revenues from the salebeyond. The second Jatropha farm was planted with fewer, more selective varieties of Jatropha seeds/oil as a resulttrees. Although some of the 2012 harvest.our trees produced fruit and seeds in 2013, we expect higher yields in subsequent years. Our plan is to continue to develop this second farm and to replace certain lower yielding varieties of trees in order to prepare this farm for commercial scale biofuel production. Jatropha seeds can be harvested twice athroughout the year. Accordingly, as the trees that we planted during the past several years mature, our harvests of Jatropha seeds willis expected to increase future revenues from our TiziminMexican operations. |
· | Although some of our trees produced fruit and seeds in 2011, the initial harvest was lower than previously anticipated primarily due to the extended rainy season and the resulting impact of fungus on the trees planted. |
| · | Our Tizimin, Mexico, operations arehave been eligible for agricultural and other subsidies provided to certain foreign owned farming operations by the federal government of Mexico. Through the year endedending December 2011,31, 2013, we have received a total of $938,000$2,146,000 of subsidy payments. These subsidies have been used to defray some of the initial start-up and early adopter costs that we have incurred in establishing these farms and were recognized as revenues.farms. We will continue to apply for any subsidies that we qualify for in future years. |
· | We operate a commercial sized nursery at our first farm that is used for the germination of new Jatropha seedlings. These seedlings are essential to our ability to plant and cultivate the |
| · | unplanted portions of our farms and any additional farms that we may acquire and develop in the future. |
· | Oil extraction facilities, germplasm resources, and sheep herding capabilities are all being increased in anticipation of our expanding Jatropha farming operations. Industrial oil extraction facilities are expected to be located offsite of the present farms. |
· | Our Tizimin farms are being developed forwith the purposeintent of providing feedstocknon-food based feedstocks for the production of bio-fuelsbiofuels and olio-chemicals, from Jatropha oil and biomass.to displace to use of food crops in the oleo-chemicals market. However, our development and cultivation of these farms has also enabled us to generatedgenerate ancillary revenues from these operations. For example, we have received revenue from the sale of biomass (waste wood(wood and agricultural waste removed from our farms as the land is cleared for Jatropha planting), saleswhich we expanded in 2014. Since July 2014 we have produced over 300 metric tons of sheep that graze on our landsbiomass based charcoal. We have all the permits in place and control weeds, and sale ofexpect the press-cake ofcontinue the Jatropha seeds that remain after oil extraction.charcoal operations for a minimum four more years. |
| · | The third farm that we own in Mexico through our GCE Mexico operations (known as Asideros 3) is expected to ultimately be planted with Jatropha trees once we complete the replanting of certain areas of Asideros 1 and Asideros 2. Until then, we plan to prepare and plant a significant portion of this land with other crops, primarily annuals, that can be commercially sold for a number of end uses, which may include biofuels.�� In 2014, we planted the first portion of the farm with an annual seed oil crop, which will be harvested and sold in November 2014. We expect that these other farming activities will generate revenues to help support our other farming costs and will also increase the underlying value of this farm should we decide to change its use or sell it in the future. |
| · | Total capital used for start-up expenses and operations, since inception, for the three farms in Mexico (through March 16, 2012) are10, 2014) is approximately $20$26 million (excluding subsidies received from the government of Mexico). All such funding has to date been provided by the investing partners of GCE Mexico, the joint venture that indirectly owns the three MexicoMexican farms. In general, theseOur investment partners will havepartner has a priority right to receive cash distributions declared by GCE Mexicorevenues generated from these farms until the cumulative amount of theirthis investment, plus a preferred return, has been returned. We will share in revenues and profits generated by the three farms if/when the foregoing $27 million investment, plus the accumulated return, has been returned to them.the investor. |
BelizeCamelina Farming Operations
On July 2, 2009,March 13, 2013, we completed the purchase of certain assets, patents, and other intellectual property and rights related to the development of Camelina sativa as a biofuels feedstock (the “Camelina Assets”) from Targeted Growth, Inc., a Washington corporation. Also on March 13, 2013, we purchased Technology Alternatives Limited,all of the membership interests of Sustainable Oils, LLC, (“SusOils”) a Delaware limited liability company, from Targeted Growth, Inc. and the other, minority owner of that limited liability company. SusOils is a company formed underthat, since 2007, has been engaged in the lawsdevelopment, production and commercialization of Belize (“TAL”). TAL owns an existing Jatropha farmCamelina-based biofuels and FDA approved animal feed. Substantially all of the Camelina Assets were previously owned by SusOils and used in subtropical Belize, Central America. SusOils’ operations.
The Camelina Assets include: three issued U.S. patents on Camelina Sativa varieties; a substantial portfolio of other IP assets, all of the seller’s intellectual property related to the research, functions from this farm have been relocateddevelopment, breeding and/or genetic development of Camelina; germplasm; licenses, consents, permits, variances, certifications and approvals granted by any governmental agencies relating to our commercial farmsCamelina operations; machines, equipment, tractors and vehicles used in MexicoCamelina operations; the name “Sustainable Oils” and the Belize farmSustainable Oils logo; and certain trade secrets, know-how, and technical data. Our goal is to continue, and expand, the operations of Sustainable Oils (although such operations may be conducted under a new subsidiary), and to obtain additional funding for that subsidiary.
We paid for the Camelina Assets by issuing to Targeted Growth, Inc. (i) a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $1,300,000 (the “Promissory Note”) and (ii) an aggregate of 40,000,000 shares of our common stock. The Promissory Note was originally secured by certain of the machines, equipment, tractors and vehicles that we purchased to Targeted Growth, Inc. In September 2014, we renegotiated the terms fo the agreement and returned these machines, tractors, vehicle to Targeted Growth, Inc. in consideration for a reduction of outstanding balance of the Promissory Note and the extension of the maturity date of the Promissory Note to December 31, 2014. The current note is no longer secured by any assets.
The purchase price for the Sustainable Oils, LLC membership interests was $100. Sustainable Oils’ assets included 295,000 pounds of “certified” Camelina seeds to be used or sold for the production of Camelina feedstock. The liabilities of Sustainable Oils include an approximately $2.3 million liability to UOP LLC, which is secured by a lien on the three patents we acquired as part of the Camelina Assets. We did not, however, assume the foregoing $2.3 million liability.In order to facilitate our Camelina operations, we have also entered into a long-term license agreement with Targeted Growth, Inc. under which Targeted Growth granted us a world-wide, exclusive license for the use of certain of its patented intellectual property with our future Camelina operations. The license requires us to pay a royalty commencing with the commercialization of the covered intellectual properties. We have also subleased a portion of Targeted Growth’s Bozeman, Montana research facility, where SusOils had previously performed its research and development. We will continue Camelina research and development at that same facility with the support, as needed by certain employees of Targeted Growth, who will provide services to us under a separate Services Agreement, on an as needed, cost pass-through basis.
Since its formation, SusOils has, among other things, developed new Camelina products, been issued three U.S. plant protection patents on technologies it developed, arranged for the planting and harvesting of over 100,000 acres of Camelina in 10 states and Canadian provinces, performed Camelina research or field level trials in 34 US States and 6 Canadian provinces, as well as seven other countries (Spain, Italy, Portugal, Australia, New Zealand, Ukraine and Saudi Arabia). SusOils has contract processed Camelina oil into renewable jet fuel that they supplied to the U.S. Navy’s aircraft fleet. During the years 2010 through 2012, Sustainable Oils generated over $20 million of revenues from its operations and incurred net losses in part due to its research and business development activities of over $5.8 million (unaudited estimate). Although we intend to utilize SusOils’ technologies and to capitalize on that company’s business development efforts, our business plan for the Camelina business differs from the Sustainable Oils business model. Specifically, at this time, we have no planned sales of oil to the U.S. military.
We are currently is inactive,operating our Camelina business through a new subsidiary, Sustainabel Oils Inc, a Delaware Corporation. We have capitalized that new subsidiary with certain of the Sustainable Oils intellectual properties and operating and intangible assets that we are actively pursuingrecently purchased. In order to fund the operations and expansion of the Camelina operations, we will need to raise additional capital through the sale of this asset. The net assets ofdebt or equity in the Belize farm are classified as held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet. In connection with the acquisition, we currently owe the former owners approximately U.S. $258,000 ($516,139 Belize Dollars) based on exchange rates in effect at March 1, 2012. The notes are secured by a mortgage on the land and related improvements. The notes, plus any related accrued interest were due on July 15, 2011 andnewly formed Delaware Camelina subsidiary, Sustainable Oils, Inc. Sustainable Oils’ research operations have been extendedheadquartered in Bozeman, Montana. We intend to August 16, 2012.continue to conduct our Camelina research operations in Montana. Accordingly, in March 2013, we entered into a sublease with Targeted Oils, Inc., a Washington based crop biotechnology company focused on developing products with enhanced yield and improved quality for the agriculture and energy industries, to sublease a portion of Targeted Growth’s research facilities and administrative offices in Bozeman, Montana. See, “Item 1.02. Properties.”
In February 2013, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued a final rule that describes new fuel pathways to qualify Camelina oil (new feedstock) as an advanced biodiesel and renewable diesel (including jet fuel and heating oil). With the recent approval of Camelina oil by the EPA as an advanced biofuels feedstock under national renewable fuel standards, the new focus for Sustainable Oils is to quickly expand its footprint of planted acreage to achieve economies of scale and profitability. We plan to commercialize and expand its products into areas where the highest value can be obtained. This includes for various biofuels, renewable chemicals, specialty chemicals and high value animal feed. We plan to continue to:
| 1. | Utilize established farmers with available land which is either fallow or idle due to crop rotation. By using their existing equipment and labor we will minimize capital costs and maximize resource utilization, increasing net revenue and profits to the farmers, and; |
| 2. | Utilize existing regional processing resources. This will add incremental revenue to existing processing facilities and allow us to utilize facilities during slower or idle times, further adding revenue and profit for oil and meal processers, and; |
| 3. | Expand research and development efforts to continue to increase yield from Camelina production. We will support our contract farmers with strong plant and soil science. This will further improve revenue and reduce unit production costs, generating additional revenue and profits to be shared with farmers and processers, and; |
| 4. | Strategically locate “Camelina Farming Regions” near regional support services which include processing and logistics hubs, and; |
| 5. | Develop strategic partnerships and supply agreements near “Camelina Farming Regions” throughout the U.S. and Europe to produce significant purpose-specific acreage, supplying more regional and local users. This will optimize logistics and processing costs and provide for higher revenue and profit, and; |
| 6. | In 2015, upon receiving adequate funding, our plan is to contract with farmers for over 32,000 planted acres of Camelina to achieve economies of scale, and; |
| 7. | By 2023, our business plan is to develop over 350,000 acres of Camelina growing annually in the US, with additional international acreage. |
Principal Products
The Jatropha curcas and Camelina sativa plantplants will continue to be our primary agricultural focus for the foreseeable future. The Jatropha plant is a perennial, inedible tree, and all of its by-products can be used for either fuel, non-ediblea vegetable oil uses and biomasssubstitute in non-food products of biomass-based energy production. It is a very efficient tree that produces high quality seed oil and high-energy content biomass. Camelina sativa is an annual plant grown primarily in northerly climates, including the United States, as a rotational crop with wheat and other food crops when land is either fallow or not being used. As a result, Camelina does not compete with food production or create direct land use change. We expect our principal products to include the bio-fuelsbiofuels oil feedstock, vegetable oil replacement and biomass derived from the cultivation and processing of the Jatropha plant.both plants. In addition, we expect to generate revenues from the sale of carbon credits earned from our agricultural operations.
Bio-fuelsBiofuels Oil Feedstock
The feedstock oil needed for the production of bio-jet, bio-diesel,biodiesel, renewable diesel and green diesel that is currently available on the market today is primarily supplied from edible plant seed oils, including soy, canola (rapeseed), sunflower and palm. There are other types of feedstock utilized includingthat can be converted into biofuels, like animal fats and recycled cooking grease, but they make up a small portion of the market supply. Our primary source of bio-fuelsbiofuels feedstock will be from the oil produced from the Jatropha plant.and Camelina seed oil. One significant advantage of the Jatropha plantand Camelina over other traditional oil seed crops is that its oil and meal is inedible, and the cultivation of the plant, which will primarily be for use in the bio-fuels industry, doesthey do not compete for resources with other crops grown primarily for food consumption.
Camelina sativa is a member of the mustard family, a distant relative to canola, and a relatively new and attractive entrant into the biofuels feedstock sector. Camelina plants are heavily branched, growing from one to three feet tall and have branched stems that become woody as they mature. As the reproductive cycle progresses, seed pods form which contain many relatively small, oily seeds. Because there is no seed dormancy in Camelina, it can be grown in multiple seasons and has a very short maturity curve.
Camelina can produce seeds with relatively little water and can be harvested early. It is classified as a low input crop and can survive on little water/rainfall, and it requires less fertilizer than many other crops. Camelina can be seeded and harvested with conventional farm equipment, making it a perfect rotation crop for existing farmers.
Camelina seeds typically contain between 35-38% oil and are high in omega-3 fatty acids. This makes the oil very desirable for biofuels production and the meal left after the oil has been removed is a very good option for livestock feed—competing directly with soy and canola meal.
Biomass Feedstock
The Jatropha plant produces a fruit (about the size of a walnut) containing three large seeds that contain 32%-38% oil content by weight. The non-oil components of the fruit, which represents 62-68% of the total fruit, contain high energy biomass (carbon values) that is an excellent source of feedstock for a number of energy producing processes including direct combustion, gasification, power production, and cellulosic ethanol (alcohol) production. Fifty percent of the energy in the Jatropha seed resides in the biomass.
Camelina produces a co-product from the oil extraction process which is a high protein press-cake (meal) that has been tested and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a livestock (animal) feed for cattle, chickens and pigs. This provides additonal revenue and reduces the net production cost of the crude Camelina oil, further improving project economics.
Carbon Credits
Bio-fuelsThe production and use is a very effective means to reduce both localof biofuels reduces total global emissions – and global pollution from emissionscorresponding anthropogenic climate change – by recycling carbon that cause climate change. Growing trees and plants that sequester carbon fromhas already been released into the atmosphere and burning bio-fuels offsetpreventing new, fossil-based carbon from being released.
| · | Growing perennial and annual crops, like Jatropha and Camelina, respectively, offsets the production and release of greenhouse gas intensive fuels and reduces total global emissions. |
| · | Jatropha and Camelina derived biofuels also produce significantly less Nitrous Oxide (“NOx”), Sulfur Oxide (“Sox”) and Particulate Matter of less than microns (“PM10”), all of which contribute to regional pollution and global climate change. |
| · | The development of agricultural-based energy projects, like plant oil and related biomass, may produce carbon credits through the sequestration (storing) of carbon and the displacement of fossil-based fuels. |
| · | The international climate consensus that created the Kyoto Accord also prompted several state, regional and sub-regional climate initiatives, mandates and voluntary schemes that require or encourage entities to reduce overall emissions. |
| · | Competing voluntary standards include the Voluntary Carbon Standard (VCS), the Gold Standard VER (GS-VER), Social Carbon (SC) and Climate Action Reserve (CAR). |
| · | California passed Assembly Bill 32 making it the only state in the U.S. that currently has a functioning cap-and-trade program to limit overall greenhouse gas emissions. |
| · | Through our Sustainable Oils, Inc. subsidiary, we have an application pending with the California Air Resources Board (ARB) for a unique Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) pathway for our Camelina oil as a low carbon feedstock. We expect this will be approved in November 2014, making Sustainable Oils’ Camelina the lowest carbon intense (CI) crop available for biofuels production for use in the State of California. This approval will provide an additional economic benefit for growers and processors of Camelina oil produced using Sustainable Oils’ patented seed varieties. |
| · | We continue to pursue the highest value market for our carbon credit development activities, and we anticipate our California Camelina operations will qualify for generating high-value, California compliant credits. |
In response to inaction at the productionfederal level on issues of global climate change, California passed Assembly Bill 32 making it the only state that currently has a functioning cap-and-trade program to limit overall greenhouse gasses which result from the consumptiongas emissions. Regulated parties, those emitting more than 25,000 metric tons of petroleum or other fossil-based fuels. Many bio-fuels produce less pollution, including fewer quantities of COcarbon dioxide equivalent (CO2, NOx, SOx and PM10. Through the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, itself an update to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, signatory countriese) per year, are required to reduce their overall greenhouse gas emissionshold carbon allowances – those given out by the state to create the “cap” – or carbon footprint. The compliance carbon market, established by the Kyoto Accord, remains in a state of considerable uncertainty after the climate summit in Durban, South Africa in 2011 did not produce any binding, long-term emission reduction commitments. As of September 2011, 191 states have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol. The United States of America is not a signatorycredits – those generated from offsetting CO2 emissions – equal to the Kyoto Protocol and Canada, Japan and Russia have recently announced their decision to withdraw their participation or not participate in the second commitment period. Signatory countries require local industry and other local energy end-users to either reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, or purchase greenhouse gas emission credits (carbon credits). This requirement has created a worldwide “Carbon Credit Trading Market” where sellers sell their excess carbon credits and buyers purchase the carbon credits they need to meet their greenhouse gas reduction requirements. The development of agricultural-based energy projects may produce carbon credits through the sequestration (storing) of carbon by the growing of trees and plants, or by the offset of other sequestered carbon. Selling carbon credits represents potential additional revenue that will help to offset capital requirements for our plantation and other development activities.total CO2e emissions.
In our case,With respect to the compliance market, Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) may be generated through Clean Development Mechanism registered projects in non-Annex 1 nations, which include Mexico, the Caribbean, Central and South America. Our current business plan contemplates the cultivation of multiple 20,000-hectareadditional Jatropha energy farms. Assuming full maturity ofthat our Jatropha operations increase as planned and that we operate a 20,000-hectare Jatropha farm, we have calculated that we will generate more than 250,000 metric tons of sellable carbon credits annually. This will come from directly offsetting fossil fuel use. If we include the potential to use Jatropha trees as a carbon sink, we estimate this will increase the sellable carbon credits to over 350,000 metric tons per year.
Technology and Patents
Camelina: On March 13, 2013, through the acquisition of SusOils we acquired three U.S. patents and two patent applications. The patents consist of the following:
(a) U.S. Patent Serial No. 12/945,420 entitled "Camelina Sativa Variety 'SO-40"
(b) U.S. Patent Serial No. 12/945,438 entitled "Camelina Sativa Variety 'SO-50"
(c) U.S. Patent Serial No. 12/945,455 entitled "Camelina Sativa Variety 'SO-60"
On July 15, 2014 we were issued an additional U.S. Patent, No, US 8,779,238 B2, for our “Floral Dip” method of (non-GMO) transformation of Camelina plants that can manipulate its agronomic qualities.
Jatropha: We do not currently possess any patentable technology relating to our Jatropha operations, in the feedstockbut we have developed considerable know-how, trade secrets, and bio-fuels market. However, weproprietary processes and procedures for farm development and operations management. We are currently engaged in research and development activities focused on improved Jatropha varieties, and we continue to expand on technical know-how and proprietary processes for optimizing the quality of our Jatropha yields, reducing operating costs and improving our production capacity and efficiency. These research and development activities currently consist of plant biology and molecular genetic research, and are being conducted primarily through in-house research and in joint development activities in concert with the non-profit Center for Sustainable Energy Farming, through Penn State University.Farming. We continue to develop our procedures and Intellectual Property (IP)proprietary Sustainable Energy Farming Systems. ItSystems and it is expected that patentable technologies will result from our research activities; however,activities. However, there can be no assurance that patentable technologies will be developed, or if they are developed, that we would be the sole owners of such patents.
Any technology we develop will be in one of three main categories: (i) plant and soil sciences, (ii) agricultural technology and procedure development, andor (iii) material processing and end use applications.
Such technologies developed are expected to assist in reducing costs, improving efficiency and allowing us to move theour products higher inup the value creation.
Market
According to both the International Energy Agency (“IEA”) and the USU.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) estimates, the world demand for crude oil in 20102013 was approximately 8889 million barrels per day, with approximately 25%20% of that demand being diesel and fuel oil (distillate fuel oil). This equates to a global consumption of distillate fuel oil of approximately 22.0 million barrels per day, or 337 billion gallons per year. At a 5% blend, with bio-diesel, the world market for bio-dieselbiodiesel exceeds 16.8 billion gallons per year.
U.S. diesel fuel oil consumption for 20092013 was over 5057 billion gallons. At a 5% bio-diesel blend, the US bio-dieselU.S. biodiesel market iswas over 2.52.85 billion gallons per year, which we expect will continue to grow.
As reported by the National Biodiesel Board, in 2009Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. bio-dieselbiodiesel refineries produced approximately 506 millionover 1.0 billion gallons of neat (100%) bio-dieselbiodiesel fuel in 2013, from a reported 122100+ active producers with a total capacity of over 2 billion gallons. This is just over 25%50% of capacity and represents less than 1%approximately 1.8% of USU.S. demand for diesel fuel. The trend of production and consumption of biodiesel is growing. In 2005, U.S. refineries produced and sold approximately 75 million gallons,gallons; in 2006, approximately 250 million gallons were sold,gallons; in 2007, approximately 450 million gallons were soldgallon; and in 2008, approximately 678 million gallons; in 2009 approximately 506 million gallons. The reductiondrop in production in 2009 is primarily due to increased feedstock costs. In both 2012 and 2013, U.S. biodiesel production exceeded 1.0 billion gallons.
Our primary market is the direct sale of Jatropha feedstockand Camelina oil for bio-diesel,biodiesel, renewable diesel, renewable jet fuel, green plastics and renewable chemicals. In addition we will sell biomass for energy production and the sale ofanimal feed and we will sell carbon credits we generate from our agricultural operations. Our primary customers are processors of bio-fuels.biofuels and users of plant based oils for chemical production. We estimate that there are approximately 122 bio-dieselover 100 biodiesel plants in the United States alone, which can utilize up to 100% of our crude or refined Jatropha and Camelina oil. However, we expect to generate our highest revenues and greatest margins from customers who have logistical capacity on a water port accessible from the Gulf of Mexico.Mexico or those located in close proximity to strategic Camelina growing regions. This will reduce redundant transportation costs and allow us to ship large quantities economically. These customers have historically paid a higher price for feedstock oil, since the majority of feedstock oil supplies have been shipped from the Midwestern United States. We anticipate that our key customer profile will include well-financed, low-cost bio-diesel refiners.biodiesel refiners and specialty oleo chemical companies.
Oil made from
Camelina-based fuels have been flight tested by the seedsU.S. military and by many commercial airlines. The U.S. Navy tested and certified Camelina biofuel provided by Sustainable Oils as a 50-percent blend with regular jet fuel in the A-10 Thunderbolt II, the F-15 Eagle, the C-17 Globemaster III, and the F-22 Raptor. Sustainable Oils has provided nearly 500,000 gallons of Camelina-based hydrotreated renewable jet fuel (HRJ) to multiple branches of the U.S. military for its certification programs, making it the most thoroughly tested alternative fuel feedstock. Jatropha plantoil has also recently been tested and approved by ASTM as an aviation fuel supplement.biofuel feedstock. A number of airlines, including Air New Zealand, Japan Airlines, Continental Airlines, Aeromexico and the US Air ForceU.S. Department of Defense have successfully tested the bio-jet fuel for commercial use.use, produced by Jatropha. GCEH has supplied Jatropha Oil as part of a number of tests for Interjet, Aeromexico and other. The ability of Jatropha oil to replace kerosene-based jet fuel is being studied to reduce the aviation world’sindustry’s dependence on high-pollution crude oil.traditional fossil fuels.
In February 2013, the EPA issued a final rule adding Camelina oil as an official advanced biofuel pathway for the production of biodiesel and renewable diesel (including renewable jet fuel and heating oil). We believe that this new rule will significantly expand the potential market for the Camelina feedstock that we intend to produce through our new Sustainable Oils/Camelina operations. This is a significant ruling as it is the first, and currently the only novel (non-food based) crop to be approved as a feedstock for the production of advanced biofuels under the national renewable fuel standards (RFS). This process took almost three years to complete.
In cooperation with Honeywell’s UOP and Emerald Biofuels, we submitted a pathway application for Jatropha oil to the EPA in June 2011. Based upon recent feedback provided by the EPA, the pathway is expected to be published for public comment later in 2014 and is expected to be approved during the first quarter of 2015.
As our business develops, we expect to utilize someindustry professionals and distributors for the sale of the Jatropha feedstockand Camelina oil and the biomass by-products that we will produce.in order to strategically target certain specialty markets and reduce overall costs.
Environmental Impact
Bio-fuels,Biofuels have social, economic and especially bio-diesel, have environmental benefits that are a major driving force forbehind their introduction.adoption. Using bio-fuelsbiofuels instead of fossil fuels reduces net emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gasses, which are associated with global climate change. Bio-fuelschange and adverse regional health impacts. Biofuels are produced from renewable plant resources that “recycle” the carbon dioxide created when bio-fuelsbiofuels are consumed. Life-cycle analyses consistently show that using bio-fuelsbiofuels produced in modern facilities results in net reductions of greenhouse gas carbon emissions compared to using fossil fuel-based petroleum equivalents. These life-cycle analyses include the totalwell-to-wheel energy requirements for theequivalent of farming and production of the biomass, resource, as well asincluding harvesting, conversion, transportation and utilization. Bio-fuelsBiofuels help nations achieve their goals of reducing carbon emissions. Bio-fuelsemissions and reducing importation of foreign oil. They burn cleanly in vehicle engines and reduce emissions of unwanted products, particularly unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and carbon monoxide.particulate matter. These characteristics contribute to improvements in local air quality.quality and all associated health benefits. In a life-cycle study published in October 2002, entitled “A Comprehensive Analysis of Bio-dieselBiodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions, 2002,” the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) analyzed bio-dieselbiodiesel produced from virgin soy oil, rapeseed (canola) and animal fats. The study concluded that the emission impact of bio-dieselbiodiesel potentially increased NOx emissions slightly while significantly reducing other major emissions.
Competition
Although there are a number of producers of bio-fuels, few are utilizing non-edible oil feedstock for the production of bio-diesel. The following table lists the companies we have been made aware of that are cultivating Jatropha for the production of bio-diesel. We do not know the current status of their operations:
Valero | Invested in a Australian Jatropha farming operation and has entered into offtake agreements to purchase the resultant CJO. |
Van Der Horst Corporation (Singapore) | Building a 200,000-tpy bio-diesel plant in Juron Island in Singapore that will eventually be supplied with Jatropha from plantations it operates in Cambodia and China, and possible new plantations in India, Laos and Burma. |
Mission Biofuels (Australia) | Hired Agro Diesel of India to manage a 100,000-hectare Jatropha plantation, and a contract-farming network in India to feed its Malaysian and Chinese bio-diesel refineries. Mission Biofuels has raised in excess of $80 million to fund its operations. |
D1 Oils (UK) | As of June 2007, together with its partners, D1 Oils has planted or obtained rights to offtake from a total approximately 172,000 hectares of Jatropha under cultivation worldwide. D1’s Jatropha plantations are located in Saudi Arabia, Cambodia, Ghana, Indonesia, the Philippines, China, India, Zambia, South Africa and Swaziland. In June 2007, D1 Oils and British Petroleum entered into a 50:50 joint venture to plant up to an additional 1 million hectares of Jatropha worldwide. British Petroleum funded the first £31.75 million of the Joint Venture’s working capital requirements through a purchase of D1 Oils equity, and the total Joint Venture funding requirement is anticipated to be £80 million over the next five years. |
NRG Chemical Engineering (UK) | Signed a $1.3 billion deal with state-owned Philippine National Oil Co. in May 2007. NRG Chemical will own a 70% stake in the joint venture, which will involve the construction of a bio-diesel refinery, two ethanol distilleries and a $600 million investment in Jatropha plantations that will cover over 1 million hectares, mainly on the islands of Palawan and Mindanao. |
Note: 1 hectare = 2.47 acres
|
We believe there is sufficient global demand for alternative, non-edible bio-fuel feedstocknon-food based inedible biofuel feedstocks to allow a number of companies to successfully compete worldwide. In particular, we note that we are the only U.S.-based public company who is a producer of non-edible oil feedstockproducing non-food based inedible oils for the production of bio-diesel,biodiesel, which gives us a unique competitive advantage over many foreign competitors when competing in the U.S.
The price basis for our non-edible oil and biomass feedstockproducts will be equivalentcomparable to othertheir edible seed oil and biomass feedstock. Weequivalents. To date, we have not foundidentified any substantial effort towardsbeing undertaken for the productioncommercialization of any other non-edible oil worldwideinedible oils that could compete with Jatropha.Jatropha or Camelina. With the growing demand for feedstock,plant-based feedstocks, and the high price of oil and bio-fuels,biofuels, we anticipate that we will be able to sell our Jatropha oilplant oils and biomass feedstock profitability.
Employees.
As of December 31, 2011,2013, across all of our subsidiaries, we had 48884 full time employees, contract employees and consultants, of which 478 were employed by our subsidiaries in Mexico.consultants. The number of employeespeople we employ fluctuates depending on ourfarm development, land preparation, planting and seasonal farm operations. Since ourOur first two farms have now been fully planted, so there are minimal development activities underway and since we have not yet commenced plantingbegun the full development of our third farm, we expect that the number of employees we employ in 2012for Jatropha, yet, We will decrease slightly.continue to “right size” our work force to support our operational needs. Neither this company, nor any of our subsidiaries is a party to any collective bargaining agreements.
Legacy Bio-pharmaceutical Assets
On December 22, 2009, we sold all patents, rights, and data associated with our legacy pharmaceutical assets to Curadis GmbH for 350,000 Euros and a revenue sharing arrangement that could pay up to 2,000,000 Euros should such legacy pharmaceutical assets ever be commercialized by the buyer. In February 2012 Curadis GmbH informed us that it had licensed some of the ancillary patents and rights to an affiliated cosmetics company. As part of that licensing arrangement, Curadis GmbH paid us an up-front licensing fee of 15,000 Euros, and agreed to pay us a royalty of 4.5% of all net sales of products sold using the licensed technology. Curadis further agreed that if we do not receive royalty payments, on a cumulative basis, of 300,000 Euros under this cosmetics license by December 31, 2014, the licensed patents will be returned to us. Curadis has also informed us that it is hopeful that the other, non-cosmetics legacy pharmaceutical assets will be commercialized within the next two to three years. We will continue to maintain a security interest in such assets until such time as, if ever, we are paid a total of 2,000,000 Euros.
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before deciding to invest in or maintain your investment in our company. The risks described below are not intended to be an all-inclusive list of all of the potential risks relating to an investment in our securities. If any of the following or other risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results and the trading price or value of our securities could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related To Our Business
We have operated at a loss and will likely continue to operate at a loss in 2012 and thereafter.
We have incurred an operating loss since our inception. We had an accumulated deficit of approximately $26,662,290, and a working capital deficit of approximately $1,726,627as of December 31, 2011. Although we generated a net profit of $271,136 for the fiscal year then ended, a significant reason for this was the receipt of grants from the Government of Mexico which were recognized as revenues and that we do not know if we will continue to receive past 2012. Further, we were able to write off certain legacy liabilities due.
We are likely to continue to incur losses unless and until we are able to generate significantly more revenues from the sale of Jatropha products, the sale of carbon credits, or from fees generated by providing Jatropha management advisory and consulting services. Although we anticipate that our revenues from these sources will increase during fiscal 2012 and thereafter, no assurance can be given that these revenues will be sufficient to generate net income in the future. Losses have had, and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and the trading price of our common stock. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with our Jatropha operations, we are unable to predict when we may become profitable, if at all. If we do not become profitable or are unable to maintain future profitability, the market value of our common stock will be adversely affected.
Our projected revenue sources are tenuous, and no assurance can be given that all anticipated revenues will, in fact, be received. In addition, our current liabilities still significantly exceed our current assets, and the amount of revenues that we expect to generate in 2012 from our Jatropha-related consulting services and other sources may not be sufficient to fund all of our working capital needs. At present, the Company does not have sufficient funds on hand to operate past the end of April, 2012. The Company is in discussions with certain of its existing shareholders to increase their equity investment in the Company, and we believe it is likely that the Company will be successful in raising sufficient funds to meet its operating expenses for the remainder of 2012; however no assurances can be given that this will be the case. Currently, the sole source of cash that we can classify as probable and material are reimbursement payments that we receive from additional capital contributions forecasted to be provided by the Preferred Members of GCE Mexico. These reimbursements are expected to cover approximately 25% of our corporate overhead for the remainder of 2012. Although we do not currently have any consulting agreements in place for 2012, we do expect to receive management consulting fees for Jatropha management and advisory services from third parties that enter into contracts with us in the future. Although we anticipate that our Mexico farms will, in 2012, commence generating significant greater amount of revenues, all proceeds received from those harvests are expected to be used to operate the Mexico farms and, other than management fee reimbursements that we receive, none of those revenues will be available to defray our corporate overhead expenses or pay any of our on-going costs of operations. If funds we receive from these sources are not sufficient to fund our operating needs, we will have to raise funds from other sources, such as the sale of securities, strategic partnerships, or governmental grants or loans. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain such funding, if needed. In the event that we are unable to raise additional capital, or the revenues we generate are not sufficient to fund out operating expenses, we may have to reduce and restructure our operations.
We may need significant additional capital in order to fund our expansion and the implementation of our business plan, which we may be unable to obtain. If we do not receive additional funding, we may not be able to achieve our business plan of further developing our bio-fuels business and we may even be forced to reduce our future operations.
In addition to generating funds to cover our operating expenses, we will need a significant amount of additional funding in order to acquire and operate additional Jatropha farms and to otherwise implementour bio-fuels operations in accordance with our business plan. Our capital requirements for expanding our operations will be significant, and we do not currently have any of the funds that we expect to need for these purposes. Accordingly, we will need to obtain a significant amount of additional capital to continue to fund our operating expenses and to expand our Jatropha business. To date, we have acquired approximately 15,000-acres of Jatropha farms that we own in Mexico through a joint venture with our financing partners. In 2010 and 2011, we received loans of $742,652 and $2,657,437from our joint venture partners to acquire an approximately 10,657 acres of additional Jatropha farm land in Mexico. Pursuant to the terms of the Limited Liability Company Agreement for GCE Mexico, available cash will first be allocated to the Preferred Members to repay the mortgages and to repay capital contributions plus the preferred return. Only after these obligations have been satisfied will the Company expect to receive cash distributions from the existing farms. Although the Company might be able to expand upon our existing financial relationship with our partners in GCE Mexico, no assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain additional funding from our joint venture investors in the future. We do not have commitments from any third parties to provide us with additional funds to finance the acquisition, development and operation of the Jatropha farms that represent the foundation of our business plan. Certain investors may be unwilling to invest in our securities since we are traded on the OTC Bulletin Board and not on a national securities exchange, particularly if there is only limited trading in our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board at the time we seek financing. There is no assurance that sufficient funding through a financing will be available to us at acceptable terms or at all. Historically, we have raised capital through the issuance of debt and equity securities. However, given the risks associated with a relatively new and untested bio-fuels business, the risks associated with our common stock (as discussed below), on-going effects of the worldwide financial crisis that has severely affected the capital markets, and our status as a small, unknown public company, we expect in the near future, we will have a great deal of difficulty raising capital through traditional financing sources. Therefore, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to raise capital, or if we are able to raise capital, that such capital will be in the amounts needed. Our failure to raise capital, when needed, and in sufficient amounts, will severely impact our ability to develop our Jatropha bio-fuels business. Any additional funding that we obtain in an equity or convertible debt financing is likely to reduce the percentage ownership of the company held by our existing security holders. The amount of this dilution may be substantial if the trading price of our common stock is low at the time of any financing from its current levels. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain the needed additional funding, we will have to reduce or even totally discontinue our operations, which would result in a total loss to all of our shareholders.
We have limited operating history in the feedstock and bio-diesel industries, which makes it difficult to evaluate our financial position and our business plan.
We commenced our current feedstock and biofuels operations in 2007. Since then, we have focused our efforts on developing our Jatropha business, including, among other things, acquiring our Jatropha farms through a joint venture, and cultivating Jatropha plants for the subsequent production and sale of Jatropha seeds, oil and biomass. Because our operations thus far have concentrated on growing our Jatropha business, and because the Jatropha trees on our farms are only now expected to start producing commercial quantities of Jatropha fruit, we have had limited sales of Jatropha seeds, oil and by-products to date. Thus, we have little operating history as a feedstock/biofuels company on which a decision to invest in our company can be based. The future of our company currently is dependent upon our ability to successfully harvest, market and sell the Jatropha products that we expect will be generated during fiscal 2012 and thereafter, and to otherwise implement our business plan in the Jatropha business. While we believe that our business plan, if implemented as conceived, will make our company successful in the long term, we have limited operating history against which we can test our plans and assumptions, and therefore cannot evaluate the likelihood of success.
Our Jatropha operations are subject to all of the risks normally associated with large farming operations, including risks related to the weather.
Through our GCE Mexico I, LLC joint venture, we currently own approximately 15,800 acres of farm land in the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico, which land is dedicated to the production of Jatropha bio-fuel and other related products. Of those 15,800 acres, 8,247acres have been planted and contain Jatropha trees. The cultivation, planting, maintenance and harvesting of Jatropha trees is subject to all of the risks normally associated with the operation of large farms, including risks related to the weather, soil conditions, pests, insects, plant diseases, and plant selection and breeding. For example, our Mexico farms did not previously produce a significant harvest of Jatropha fruit because of the heavy rains and extended rainy season. No assurance can be given that the weather or other conditions will not adversely affect future harvests of Jatropha fruit at our Mexico farms.
Because our interest in cash distributions from our Mexico joint venture is subordinated to the return of our investors’ investments and a 12% compounded annual return, we do not expect to receive any cash from our Mexico Jatropha farms for a number of years.
The Jatropha trees we planted in 2008 in the first of our Mexico Jatropha farms are now beginning to produce fruit, and, as a result, we anticipate that in 2012 our Mexico farms will generate revenues. However, under our GCE Mexico I, LLC operating agreement, revenues from the Jatropha crop are first applied to our farm operating expenses, and then any excess cash flow is applied towards the repayment of the mortgages and repayment of the Preferred Members’investment in these farms, including a cumulative 12% per annum preferred return. As of December 31, 2011, the total preferred returnwas approximately $2.9 million, and the total capital contributed by the Preferred Members on which this preferred 12% return is calculated (excluding the $2.9 million accumulated preferred and outstanding return) is $13,940,268. We currently do not anticipate that the Mexico farms we jointly own through GCE Mexico I, LLC will generate sufficient cash to repay this amount for at least several years. Accordingly, other than management fees that GCE Mexico I, LLC is required to pay us, we do not expect to receive any cash distributions from our majority ownership interest in this entity for several years. No assurance can be given that our investment in GCE Mexico I, LLC will ever generate sufficient revenues to repay our joint venture investors and return capital to this company.
Our Jatropha biofules business is a new and highly risky business that has not been conducted on a similar scale in North America.
Our business plan calls for a large scale planting and harvesting of Jatropha plants, primarily outside of the United States, and for the subsequent production and sale of Jatropha oil (and other Jatropha byproducts) for use as a bio-fuel in Mexico and in the United States. In addition to all of the risks normally associated with developing a new line of business, we will be subject to certain risks unique to our Jatropha bio-fuels business, including the large scale production of plants that have not heretofore been grown in large scale farms in Mexico, logistical issues related to the oil and biomass produced at such farms, market acceptance, uncertain pricing of our products, developing governmental regulations, and the lack of an established market for our products.
Our business could be significantly impacted by changes in government regulations over energy policy.
Our planned operations and the properties we intend to cultivate are subject to a wide variety of federal, provincial and municipal laws and regulations, including those governing the use of land, type of development, use of water, use of chemicals for fertilizer, pesticides, export or import of various materials including plants, oil, use of biomass, handling of materials, labor laws, storage handling of materials, shipping, and the health and safety of employees. As such, the nature of our operations exposes us to the risk of claims with respect to such matters and there can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not be incurred in connection with such claims. In addition, these governmental regulations, both in the United States and in the foreign countries in which we may conduct our business, may restrict and hinder our operations and may significantly raise our cost of operations. Any breach by our company of such legislation may also result in the suspension or revocation of necessary licenses, permits or authorizations, civil liability and the imposition of fines and penalties, which would adversely affect our ability to operate and our financial condition.
Further, there is no assurance that the laws, regulations, policies or current administrative practices of any government body, organization or regulatory agency in the United States or any other jurisdiction, will not be changed, applied or interpreted in a manner which will fundamentally alter the ability of our company to carry on our business. The actions, policies or regulations, or changes thereto, of any government body or regulatory agency, or other special interest groups, may have a detrimental effect on our company. Any or all of these situations may have a negative impact on our operations.
Our future growth is dependent upon strategic relationships within the feedstock and bio-diesel industries. If we are unable to develop and maintain such relationships, our future business prospects could be significantly limited.
Our future growth will generally be dependent on relationships with third parties, including alliances with feedstock oil and bio-diesel processors and distributors. In addition, we will likely rely on third parties to oversee the operations and cultivation of the Jatropha plants in our non-U.S. properties. Accordingly, our success will be significantly dependent upon our ability to establish successful strategic alliances with third parties and on the performance of these third parties. These third parties may not regard their relationship with us as important to their own business and operations, and there is no assurance that they will commit the time and resources to our joint projects as is necessary, or that they will not in the future reassess their commitment to our business. Furthermore, these third parties may not perform their obligations as agreed. In the event that a strategic relationship is discontinued for any reason, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
A significant decline in the price of oil could have an adverse impact in our profitability.
Our success is dependent in part upon the historic high price of crude oil and on the high price of seed oils that are currently used to manufacture bio-diesel. A significant decline in the price of either crude oil or the alternative seed oils will have a direct negative impact on our financial performance.
There are risks associated with conducting our business operations in foreign countries, including political and social unrest.
All of our currently operating farms are located in Mexico. We expect that most, if not all, of our future agricultural operations will also be primarily located in foreign countries, particularly in Mexico. Accordingly, we are subject to risks not typically associated with ownership of U.S. companies and therefore should be considered more speculative than investments in the U.S.
For example, Mexico is a developing country that has experienced a range of political, social and economic difficulties over the last decade. Our operations could be affected in varying degrees by political instability, social unrest and changes in government regulation relating to foreign investment, the biofuels industry, and the import and export of goods and services. Our operations may also be affected in varying degrees by possible terrorism, military conflict, crime, fluctuations in currency rates and high inflation.
In addition, Mexico has a nationalized oil company, and there can be no assurance that the government of Mexico will continue to allow our business and our assets to compete in any way with their interests. Our operations could be adversely affected by political, social and economic unrest in Mexico and any other foreign countries in which we commence agricultural operations.
We plan to grow rapidly and our inability to keep up with such growth may adversely affect our profitability.
We plan to grow rapidly and significantly expand our operations. If we succeed in significantly expanding our operations, our growth may place a significant strain on our management team and other company resources. We will not be able to implement our business strategy in a rapidly evolving market without effective planning and management processes. If we grow significantly, we will have to manage multiple farms in various foreign locations, hundreds of foreign employees, and relationships with various domestic and foreign strategic partners. To manage the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we will have to significantly supplement our existing managerial, financial and operational staff, systems, procedures and controls. We may be unable to supplement and complete, in a timely manner, the improvements to our systems, procedures and controls necessary to support our future operations, and consequently our operations will not function effectively. In addition, our management may be unable to hire, train, retain, motivate and manage required personnel, or successfully identify, manage and exploit existing and potential market opportunities. As a result, our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Our business will not be diversified because we will be primarily concentrated in one industry. As a consequence, we may not be able to adapt to changing market conditions or endure any decline in the bio-diesel industry.
We expect our business will be substantially dependent upon the success of Jatropha as a bio-fuel. Accordingly, we expect that virtually all of our revenues will be derived from some form of Jatropha (either from the sales of feedstock oil harvested from our Jatropha farms, the bio-diesel production and sales of Jatropha oil, the sale of carbon credits produced from Jatropha farms, and the development and management services related to the cultivation and production of Jatropha plants and bio-fuel). We do not have any other lines of business or other sources of revenue to rely upon if the Jatropha business does not become viable and if we are unable to produce and sell feedstock oil and bio-diesel, or if the markets for such products decline. Our lack of diversification means that we may not be able to adapt to changing market conditions or to withstand any significant decline in the bio-diesel industry.
Reductions in the price of bio-diesel, and decreases in the price of petroleum-based fuels could affect the price of our feedstock, resulting in reductions in our revenues.
Historically, bio-diesel prices have been highly correlated to the Ultra Low Sulfur (“ULS”) diesel prices. Increased volatility in the crude oil market has an effect on the stability and long-term predictability of ULS diesel, and hence the biofuels prices in the domestic and international markets. Crude oil prices are impacted by wars and other political factors, economic uncertainties, exchange rates and natural disasters. A reduction in petroleum-based fuel prices may have an adverse effect on bio-diesel prices and could apply downward pressure on feedstock, affecting revenues and profits in the feedstock industry, which could adversely affect our financial condition.
Delays due to, among others, weather, labor or material shortages, permitting or zoning delays, or opposition from local groups, may hinder our ability to commence operations in a timely manner.
We could incur delays in the implementation of our plans to plant and harvest Jatropha, or our plans for the construction of support facilities, due to permitting or zoning delays, opposition from local groups, adverse weather conditions, labor or material shortages, or other causes. In addition, changes in political administrations at the federal, state or local level that result in policy changes towards the large scale cultivation of Jatropha, or towards biofuels in general, could result in delays in our business plan timetable. Any such delays could adversely affect our ability to fully commence operations and generate revenues.
We may be unable to locate suitable properties and obtain the development rights needed to build and expand our business.
Our business plan focuses on identifying and developing agricultural properties (farms, nurseries, etc.) for the production of biofuels feedstock. The availability of land for this activity is a key element of our projected revenue generation. Our ability to acquire appropriate land in the future is uncertain and we may be required to delay planting, which may create unanticipated costs and delays. In the event that we are not successful in identifying and obtaining rights on suitable land for our agricultural and processing facilities, our future prospects for profitability will likely be affected, and our financial condition and resulting operations may be adversely affected.
Technological advances in feedstock oil production methods in the bio-diesel industry could adversely affect our ability to compete and the value of your investment.
Technological advances could significantly decrease the cost of producing feedstock oil and biofuels. There is significant research and capital being invested in identifying more efficient processes, and lowering the cost of producing feedstock oil and biofuels. We expect that technological advances in feedstock oil/biofuel production methods will continue to occur. If improved technologies become available to our competitors, they may be able to produce feedstock oil, and ultimately biofuels, at a lower cost than us. If we are unable to adopt or incorporate technological advances into our operations, our ability to compete effectively in the feedstock/biofuels market may be adversely affected, which in turn will affect our profitability.
The development of alternative fuels and energy sources may reduce the demand for biofuels, resulting in a reduction in our profitability.
Alternative fuels, including a variety of energy alternatives to biofuels, are continually under development. Technological advances in fuel-engines and exhaust system design and performance could also reduce the use of biofuels, which would reduce the demand for bio-diesel. Further advances in power generation technologies, using cleaner hydrocarbon based fuels, fuel cells and hydrogen are actively being researched and developed. If these technological advances and alternatives prove to be economically feasible, environmentally superior and accepted in the marketplace, the market for biofuels could be significantly diminished or replaced, which would adversely affect our financial condition.
Our ability to hire and retain key personnel and experienced consultants will be an important factor in the success of our business and a failure to hire and retain key personnel may result in our inability to manage and implement our business plan.
We are highly dependent upon our management and on Richard Palmer (our Chief Executive Officer) in particular. The loss of the services of any of our management personnel may impair management's ability to operate our company or our ability to locate and develop new Jatropha farms. We have not purchased key man insurance on any of our officers, which insurance would provide us with insurance proceeds in the event of their death. Without key man insurance, we may not have the financial resources to develop or maintain our business until we could replace such individuals or to replace any business lost by the death of such individuals. We may not be able to attract and retain the necessary qualified personnel. If we are unable to retain or to hire qualified personnel as required, we may not be able to adequately manage and implement our business.
Our operating costs could be higher than we expect, and this could reduce our future profitability.
In addition to general economic conditions, market fluctuations and international risks, significant increases in operating, development and implementation costs could adversely affect our company due to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. These increases could arise for several reasons, such as:
· | Increased cost for land acquisition; |
· | Increased unit costs of labor for nursery, field preparation and planting; |
· | Increased costs for construction of facilities; |
· | Increased transportation costs for required nursery and field workers; |
· | Increased costs of supplies and sub-contacted labor for preparing of land for planting; |
· | Increase costs for irrigation, soil conditioning, soil maintenance; or |
· | Increased time for planting and plant care and custody. |
In addition, our Jatropha farm operations will also subject us to ongoing compliance with applicable governmental regulations, including those regulations governing land use, water use, pollution control, worker safety and health and welfare and other matters. We may have difficulty complying with these regulations and our compliance costs could increase significantly. Increases in operating costs would have a negative impact on our operating income, and could result in substantially decreased earnings or a loss from our operations, adversely affecting our financial condition.
Fluctuations in the Mexican peso to U.S. dollar exchange rate may adversely affect our reported operating results.
The Mexican peso is the primary operating currency for our current business operations while our financial results are reported in U.S. dollars. Because our costs will be primarily denominated in pesos, a decline in the value of the dollar to the peso could negatively affect our actual operating costs in U.S. dollars, and our reported results of operations. We do not currently engage in any currency hedging transactions intended to reduce the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on our results of operations. We cannot guarantee that we will enter into any such currency hedging transactions in the future or, if we do, that these transactions will successfully protect us against currency fluctuations.
Our future profitability is dependent upon many natural factors outside of our control. If these factors do not produce favorable results our future business profitability could be significantly affected.
Our future profitability is mainly dependent on the production output from our agricultural operations. There are many factors that can effect growth and fruit production of the Jatropha plant, including weather, nutrients, pests and other natural enemies of the plant. Many of these are outside of our direct control and could be devastating to our operations. All of our agricultural operations are concentrated in the center of the Yucatan peninsula, near Tizimin, Mexico, an area that is subject to occasional periods of drought, excess rain, flooding, and possible Hurricanes. Jatropha trees require water in different quantities at different times during the growth cycle. Accordingly, too much or too little water at any given point can adversely impact production. While we attempt to mitigate controllable weather risks through water management and variety selection, our ability to do so is limited. Our operations in Mexico are also subject to the risk of hurricanes. Hurricanes have the potential to destroy crops and impact Jatropha production through the loss of fruit and destruction of trees either as a result of high winds or through the spread of wind blown disease. Because our agricultural properties are located in relative close proximity to each other, the impact of adverse weather conditions may be magnified in our results of operations.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
Our stock is thinly traded, so you may be unable to sell your shares at or near the quoted bid prices if you need to sell a significant number of your shares.
The shares of our common stock are thinly-traded on the OTC Bulletin Board and on the OTCQB market, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common shares at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven, early stage company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common shares will develop or be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained. Due to these conditions, we can give you no assurance that you will be able to sell your shares at or near bid prices or at all if you need money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.
Our existing directors, officers and key employees hold a substantial amount of our common stock and may be able to prevent other shareholders from influencing significant corporate decisions.
As of March 16, 2012, our directors and executive officers beneficially owned approximately 25.5%of our outstanding common stock. These shareholders, if they act together, may be able to direct the outcome of matters requiring approval of the shareholders, including the election of our directors and other corporate actions such as:
· | our merger with or into another company; |
· | a sale of substantially all of our assets; and |
· | amendments to our articles of incorporation. |
The decisions of these shareholders may conflict with our interests or those of our other shareholders.
The market price of our stock may be adversely affected by market volatility.
The market price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to many factors, including:
· | fluctuation in the world price of crude oil; |
· | market changes in the biofuels industry; |
· | government regulations affecting renewable energy businesses and users; |
· | actual or anticipated variations in our operating results; |
· | our success in meeting our business goals and the general development of our proposed operations; |
· | general economic, political and market conditions in the U.S. and the foreign countries in which we plan to operate; and |
· | the occurrence of any of the risks described in this Annual Report. |
Obtaining additional capital though the sale of common stock will result in dilution of shareholder interests.
We may raise additional funds in the future by issuing additional shares of common stock or other securities, which may include securities such as convertible debentures, warrants or preferred stock that are convertible into common stock. Any such sale of common stock or other securities will lead to further dilution of the equity ownership of existing holders of our common stock. Additionally, the existing options, warrants and conversion rights may hinder future equity offerings, and the exercise of those options, warrants and conversion rights may have an adverse effect on the value of our stock. If any such options, warrants or conversion rights are exercised at a price below the then current market price of our shares, then the market price of our stock could decrease upon the sale of such additional securities. Further, if any such options, warrants or conversion rights are exercised at a price below the price at which any particular shareholder purchased shares, then that particular shareholder will experience dilution in his or her investment.
We are unlikely to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
We have never declared or paid dividends on our stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, and it is unlikely that investors will derive any current income from ownership of our stock. This means that your potential for economic gain from ownership of our stock depends on appreciation of our stock price and will only be realized by a sale of the stock at a price higher than your purchase price.
Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities and Exchange Commission's penny stock regulations, which may limit a shareholder's ability to buy and sell our stock.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer's confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.
ITEM1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Executive Offices. Currently, we operate out of offices located at 100 W. Broadway,2790 Skypark Drive, Suite 650, Long Beach California 90802.105, Torrance, CA 90505. Our leased offices consist of approximately 2,0001,296 square feet and are leased at a monthly rate of $1.70 sq. ft.$2,333 per month. The term of the lease expires on AugustJanuary 31, 2012.2019.
Farm properties.Mexico Farms and Facilities: As of March 16November 3, 2012,2014, we own the following three Jatropha farms through our GCE Mexico I, LLC joint venture:
1. Our first farm consists of seven separate parcels of land collectively representing 2,084 hectares (approximately 5,149 acres). We purchased these parcels in 2008. The farm is located approximately 12 miles northeast of Tizimin, Yucatan, Mexico and is approximately 110 miles from Merida and the port of Progresso, and 75 miles from Cancun. All of the land has been improved and we have completed planting several varieties of Jatropha on all of the planned farmland. We financed the purchase of this farm through a mortgage loan in the amount of $2,051,282, which bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum.
2. In March 2010 and June 2011, we purchased approximately 5,100, acres of additional land that is contiguous to our first farm. We substantiallyIn 2012, we completed planting Jatropha on all of the planned farmland in the 4th quarter of 2011.this farm. We financed the purchase of this farm through a mortgage loan in the amount of $963,382. That loansloan bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum.
3. In October 2011, we purchased approximately 5,557 acres of additional land for the development of a third Jatropha farm. This land is located in the same region, approximately five miles from our other two farms. We expectedhave planted a variety of Jatropha plants in our first two farms, and have used varying agricultural techniques to commence preparingin order to ascertain which variety is best suited for the land forregion. We do not intend to plant Jatropha on this third farm until we obtain more information about Jatropha production from our first two farms. In the interim, we have commenced planting inother fuel crops on the third or fourth quarterfarm on a test basis and may, if such tests prove successful, expand these alternate crops until a decision is made regarding the use of 2012, with planting to commence by the end of 2012.third farm. We financed the purchase of this farm through a mortgage loan in the amount of $ 2,095,525. That loan bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. In 2014 we plan to test plant a portion of the farm with an annual oil seed crop to prove yields with the potential for a larger deployment.
Montana Offices/Facilities. Our Sustainable Oils field and research operations will be conducted primarily from Bozeman, Montana. In March 2013, we entered into a two-year sublease with Targeted Growth, Inc. for the use of a portion of Targeted Growth’s facilities in Bozeman, Montana. The leased space, consisting of a portion of the approximately 3,149 square feet building, may be used for bona fide biological research and for general office and administrative purposes only. The building includes a seed laboratory along with related equipment and storage facilities and greenhouse space required for a breeding program. We have agreed to pay our pro rata portion of the expenses of the building, including a portion of the rent, utilities, and insurance, which rental payments vary depending on how much of each portion of the building we utilize.
On April 12, 2010, Mobius Risk Group, LLC (“Mobius”) filedFrom time to time, the Company may become a complaint against usparty to other legal actions and complaints arising in the United States District Court Southern Districtordinary course of Texas Houston Division, alleging that we breached that certain Services Agreement, dated April 30, 2007, we entered into with Mobius. Under the Services Agreement, Mobius was required to provide professional servicesbusiness, although it is not currently involved in connection with growing, producing, manufacturing, and selling seed oils. As permitted by the Services Agreement, we terminated the Services Agreement on July 11, 2008. In its complaint, Mobius has alleged that we failed to pay Mobius a total of $551,178. We have disputed the Mobius claim, and have asserted a counter claim against Mobius for direct damages sustained by us from the lack of performance of Mobius under the terms of the Service Agreement. Furthermore, we have also filed a counterclaim for breach of fiduciary duty against Eric Melvin, the CEO of Mobius and a former member of our Board of Directors, for conduct arising from his prior position as a director of this company. We currently have two motions pending with the court to dismiss Mobius’ suit and to find in our favor for our counterclaim.any such material legal proceedings.
On July 13, 2010, Dee Burgess, a former consultant of Medical Discoveries, Inc. (the name of our company until changed in connection with our new Jatropha business), filed a complaint against the Company in the Third Judicial District Court, State of Utah. The complaint alleges that Ms. Burgess is owed $80,000 for services allegedly provided to the Company in 2004, 2005, and 2006. That complaint was voluntarily dismissed without it ever being served. A new complaint was filed on June 28, 2011 and was dismissed by the court for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The complaint was then amended and re-filed. We have filed a motion for dismissal on the same grounds, which is pending in the court.
Not Applicable.applicable.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER
Shares of our common stock are traded on the OTC Bulletin Board and on the OTCQB market under the symbol “GCEH.” The following table sets forth the range of closing prices for our common stock for the quarters indicated. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-ups, markdowns or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.
| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011 | | High Bid | | | Low Bid | | |
| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | | High Bid | | | Low Bid | |
| First Quarter | | $ | .034 | | | $ | .018 | | | $ | .016 | | | $ | .016 | |
| Second Quarter | | $ | .050 | | | $ | .020 | | | $ | .016 | | | $ | .016 | |
| Third Quarter | | $ | .050 | | | $ | .036 | | | $ | .02 | | | $ | .018 | |
| Fourth Quarter | | $ | .042 | | | $ | .020 | | | $ | .014 | | | $ | .012 | |
| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010 | | High Bid | | | Low Bid | | |
| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | | High Bid | | | Low Bid | |
| First Quarter | | $ | .020 | | | $ | .010 | | | $ | .04 | | | $ | .03 | |
| Second Quarter | | $ | .140 | | | $ | .010 | | | $ | .02 | | | $ | .02 | |
| Third Quarter | | $ | .050 | | | $ | .030 | | | $ | .02 | | | $ | .01 | |
| Fourth Quarter | | $ | .040 | | | $ | .030 | | | $ | .01 | | | $ | .01 | |
ShareholdersStockholders
As of March 16November 3, 2012,2014, there were approximately 1,500 holders of record of our common stock, not including any persons who hold theirthe stock in “street name.”
Dividends
We have not paid any dividends on our common stock to date and do not anticipate that we will pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be dependent upon the amount of funds legally available, our earnings, if any, our financial condition, our anticipated capital requirements and other factors that the Board of Directors may think are relevant. However, we currently intend for the foreseeable future to follow a policy of retaining all of our earnings, if any, to finance the development and expansion of our business and, therefore, do not expect to pay any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. No dividends are required to be paid to holders of the Series B shares. However, the Company may not declare, pay or set aside any dividends on shares of any class or series of the Company’s capital stock (other than dividends on shares of our common stock payable in shares of common stock) unless the holders of the Series B shares shall first receive, or simultaneously receive, an equal dividend on each outstanding share of Series B shares.
Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table contains information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2011:2013:
| Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | | |
1993 Incentive Plan (1) | 1,933,000 | $0.17 | -- |
2002 Stock Incentive Plan | 18,500,000 | $0.04 | 1,500,000 |
2010 Equity Incentive Plan | 19,750,000 | $0.025 | 250,000 |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | |
| Options | 3,350,000 | 0.021 | |
Warrants | 55,784,145 | $0.016 | |
| | | | |
Total
___________________ | 99,317,145 | | 1,750,000 |
| Plan Category | | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column) | |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | | | | | | | | |
2002 Stock Incentive Plan (1) | | | 19,850,000 | | | $ | 0.03 | | | | 150,000 | |
2010 Equity Incentive Plan | | | 19,950,000 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | | 50,000 | |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders Options | | | 1,850,000 | | | $ | 0.02 | | | | | |
Warrants | | | 29,645,311 | | | $ | 0.02 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total ____________________ | | | 69,375,311 | | | | | | | | 200,000 | |
(1) The 1993 Incentive Plan hasThese incentive plans have expired and no additional options or awards can be granted under this plan.
Recent Issuances Of Unregistered Securities
We did not issue any unregistered securities during the three-month period ended December 31, 20112013 that were not previously reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Repurchase of Shares
We did not repurchase any of itsour shares during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Overview
During the past threefour years, we have focused our efforts on acquiring, improving, and planting Jatropha farms (which are located in Mexico). To date, most of the Jatropha trees that we planted in our new farms have not been mature enough to bear significant amount of Jatropha fruit from which we could produce commercial quantities of Jatropha oil. The firstMost of the trees that we planted are now, however, maturing to the point that we anticipate beingand should be able to produce a normal harvest substantial quantities of fruitJatropha seeds. However, our first farm, which was used largely as a test farm to determine which varieties of Jatropha are most suitable for commercial production in 2012.Mexico, has not produced many seeds. While certain varieties of Jatropha trees planted on the second farm have been more productive, the seeds being harvested from these trees on the second farm are being used to grow replacement trees for the less productive trees, and not for the purpose of producing oil. As a result, neither of these farms is expected to generate significant revenues in the near future. Pending the selection of the best variety of Jatropha trees to plant on our third farm in the region, we planted a portion of our third farm with a (non-Jatropha) annual oil seed crop and plan to expand that planting significantly in 2015. This alternative crop is expected to generate revenue and some profits, which will be used to defray the operating costs on the other two farms. Our intent is to develop agronomic best practices for the region and to prove yields for a future larger deployment. As a result, we anticipate that our farms will commence generating increased revenues in 2012. We recently finished planting Jatropha trees on our second farm, and therefore anticipate that those trees will likewise start bearing fruit in 2013. We have also recently purchased a third farm, and wedo not expect to start cultivating and planting Jatropha trees on this third farm later in 2012. As these newly planted trees mature theyuntil we have obtained the results of the testing program we conducted on our first two farms. Because our farms are still young and developing and our agricultural practices are still evolving, we are unable to accurately predict the amount of fruit and Jatropha oil that our farms will bear fruit from which we can produce Jatropha oil. With the additional productive trees, revenues from our farm are expected to significantly increase in the future.
Our Mexico farmMexican farming operations are managed by us through our wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, Global Energias Renovables, and the direct farm labor is employed through wholly owned Mexican companies owned by GCE Mexico, I, LLC (“GCE Mexico”) , our majority-controlled subsidiary. GCE Mexico obtains its funding from on-going equity contributions offrom the unaffiliated investorsaffiliated investor of that entity. Revenues generated, and expected to be generated, by the operations of GCE Mexico’s three farms will be used by that entity, and profits, if any, will be distributed to all owners of GCE Mexico (including this company)company, once the investor has recovered his investment and has been paid the accumulated preferred return).
We currently receive monthly payments from GCE Mexico to reimburse us for our expenses (including an allocation for overhead expenses) related to the management of the Mexico operations. In addition to the reimbursements we receive for managing GCE Mexico and the three Mexico farms, this company (Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.) generates revenues from fees received for providing advisory and consulting services to third parties regarding Jatropha farms and the uses of Jatropha bio-diesel.biodiesel. Other than subsidies received from the Government of Mexico, these management/advisory service fees and the reimbursement payments from GCE Mexico I, LLC have been our principal sources of cash flow.
In March 2013, we acquired the Camelina assets and operations of Sustainable Oils, LLC, a company that, since 2007, has been engaged in the development, production and commercialization of Camelina-based biofuels. Sustainable Oils has generated over $20 million of revenues during the past three years of its operations. However, our ability to operate the Camilina operations in North America is dependent upon receiving additional financing. No assurance can be given that our business plan for the Camelina business will result in profitable operations. Sustainable Oils is a wholly-owned subsidiary. Its liabilities include an approximately $2.3 million liability to UOP LLC, which debt is secured by a lien on three patents we acquired as part of the purchase of the Camelina assets from Targeted Growth, Inc.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported assets, liabilities, sales and expenses in the accompanying financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those that require the most subjective and complex judgments, often employing the use of estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
The Company’s most critical accounting policies and estimates that may materially impact the Company’s results of operations include:
Agricultural Producer. All costs incurred including the actual planting of the Jatropha trees are capitalized as plantation development costs, and are included in “Property and Equipment” on the balance sheet. Plantation development costs are being accumulated in the balance sheet during the development period and will be accounted for in accordance with accounting standards for Agricultural Producers and Agricultural Cooperatives. The direct costs associated with each farm and the production of the Jatropha revenue streams have been deferred and accumulated as a noncurrent asset and are included in “Deferred Growing Costs” on the balance sheet. Other general costs without expected future benefits are expensed when incurred.
Certain other critical accounting policies, including the assumptions and judgments underlying them, are disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report. However, we do not believe that there are any alternative methods of accounting for our operations that would have a material effect on our financial statements.
Results Of Operations
RevenuesRevenues.. During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2011, (‘fiscal 2011”)2013 and December 31, 2010 (“fiscal 2010”) ,2012 we recognized revenuesrevenue of $1,277,385$332,320 and $848,808,$1,136,083, respectively. The revenues that we generated in 2011, and 2010 primarily represent government subsidies received and fees earned for2013 were derived from Camelina product sales, Jatropha related advisory services we rendered to third parties. To a lesser extent,parties, and government subsidies we received from agencies in Mexico. Most of our 2012 revenues also includerepresented (i) sales of Jatropha oil and Jatropha seeds and other products (waste wood, Jatropha seed husks, etc.), (ii) agricultural subsidies received from our Mexico farms. SinceMexican governmental agencies, and (iii) fees for Jatropha related advisory services we acquired our first Jatropha farmrendered to third parties. Revenues during the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by $803,763 from the comparable 2012 fiscal period because we only received $51,072 in 2008, we have been engaged in cultivating the farms and planting Jatropha trees. The Jatropha trees in our first farm are expected to produce the first significant size harvest later in 2012. The harvest from our first farm is expected to increase each year until maturity is achieved. Planting in the second Jatropha farm was substantially completed at the end of 2011, and the trees on that farm are expected to produce their first significant harvest at the end of 2014, while reaching maturity in 2017.
The increase in revenues in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 is the result of an increase in subsidy payments receivedagricultural subsidies from the Mexican government an increase in Jatropha farmthe current fiscal period, compared to $768,272 of such subsidies in the same period last year. Additionally, advisory feesrevenue decreased by $86,563 from the same period in 2012. Revenues received from third parties,agricultural subsidies and to a lesser extent, from an increase in revenues generated from the sale of Jatropha products are paid to our GCE Mexico subsidiary and are used in its operations in Mexico. Revenues we generate from Jatropha farm products. Ouradvisory services and from Camelina operations are used for this company’s operations. Advisory services revenue approximated $221,000 and $347,000 in 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; collectability is reasonably assured; and title and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the buyer. Value added taxes collected on revenue transactions are excluded from revenue and are included in accounts payable until remittance to the taxation authority. The significant sources of revenue are Advisory services and Agricultural subsidies.
Advisory services revenue - The Company provides development and management services to other companies regarding their bio-fuels and/or feedstock-Jatropha development operations, on a fee for services basis. The advisory services revenue is recognized upon completion of the work in accordance with the separate contract.
Agricultural subsidies revenue - the Company receives agricultural subsidies from the Mexican government. Due to the uncertainty of these payments, the revenue is recognized when the payments are received.
In the short term, our goal is to increase the amount of advisory and management services that we render to third parties in 2012order to generate revenues to fund our corporate working capital needs, and to generate Camelina-related revenues from the Camelina business that we acquired in March 2013. In the longer term, our goal is to substantially increase the revenues derived from the operations of our Jatropha farms, (particularly fromto rapidly ramp up our Camelina operations by increasing the anticipated Jatropha harvestamount of Camelina acreage under plantation in our first farm)North America, and to continue to generate fees from advisory services that we render to third parties. Now that we have obtained all permits necessary to produce charcoal from the biomass available at our Mexico farms, we expect to generate additional revenues in the fourth quarter of 2014 and thereafter from the sale of renewable charcoal in Mexico.
See Note 1 for further discussion on other expected sources of revenue.
General And Administrative Expenses. Our general and administrative expenses, for fiscal 2011, and fiscal 2010 were $2,087,447 and $2,659,588, respectively.of $2,573,719 related to the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by 8% from prior year’s expense of $2,069,309 due in part to the expansion of our operations into the Camelina business. General and administrative expenses principally consist of officer compensation, outside services (such as legal, accounting, and consulting expenses), share-based compensation, and other general expenses (such as insurance, occupancy costs and travel). The decrease is significantly relatedGeneral and administrative expenses are, however, expected to increase as a decreaseresult of our acquisition of the Camelina assets/business in officer compensation.March 2013. In connection with operating the new Camelina operations, we have increased the number of employees on our payroll, and have committed to sublease a facility in Bozeman, Montana.
Plantation and Operating Costs. WeFor the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 we recorded plantationPlantation Operating Costs from the operations of the farms of $786,300 and operating$826,227, respectively. The decrease in the year ended in 2013 from 2012 was mostly due to a work force reduction at our Mexico farms as we scaled back planting of new Jatropha trees at those Mexico farms.
Write Down of Impaired Long Lived Assets. During the year ended December 31, 2013 we wrote down certain of our long term assets by $3,440,904 and in the year ended 2012 by $1,639,815. For 2013 and 2012, this write off represents a reduction in the accumulated deferred growing cost balance related to our first Jatropha farm in Mexico which are considered to be commercially unproductive because the trees on those portions have not produced adequate growth for the age of the trees, potentially have origins that have not adapted to the climatic region, are planted on inadequate or unsuitable land, or have limited resistance to local fungus and pests. The trees in certain areas are not expected to produce enough yield or generate enough future revenues to offset the capital expended in a reasonable period of time and, accordingly, an impairment charge was recorded.
The Company regularly evaluates its property and equipment and other long-lived assets for impairment based on its classification as a) held for sale or b) to be held and used. Several criteria must be met before an asset is classified as held for sale, including that management with the appropriate authority commits to a plan to sell the asset at a reasonable price in relation to its fair value and is actively seeking a buyer. For assets held for sale, the Company recognizes the asset at the lower of carrying value or fair market value less costs to sell, as estimated based on comparable asset sales, offers received, or a discounted cash flow model. For assets to be held and used, the Company reviews for impairment whenever indicators of $454,947 and $389,738 for fiscal 2011 and fiscal2010, respectively. Materially, all costs incurred,impairment exist. The Company then compares the estimated future cash flows, at an average growth rate of 30% after 2015, of the asset, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying value of the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then an impairment is recorded based on the farms, arefair value of the asset, typically measured using a discounted cash flow model with a discount rate of 65%. The projected cash flows used in the companies impairment test is over a 15 year period using approved forecasts. The company’s assumptions related to cultivationthe growth rate and harvesting. These costs were deferred into the long-term asset, “Deferred Growing Cost”.cash flow discount rate is management’s estimates based on historical trends in the farm development and growth in the yield from the trees. There is a risk the actual results will be much less than management’s assumptions used in the impairment test. Many factors, such as the weather, pest and disease control can cause the company’s future cash flows to be less than expected.
If an asset is still under development, future cash flows include remaining construction costs. All recognized impairment losses, whether for assets held for sale or assets to be held and used, are recorded as operating expenses. See Note 1 for information on recorded impairment charges.
OtherInterest Income/ExpenseExpense.. The principal component of Other Income/Expense for fiscal 2011 was the $1,024,076 gain that we recognized from the settlement of liabilities. Gain on settlement of liabilities represents gains we realized by discharging historic liabilities (most of which were incurred while this company operated as a developmental-stage bio-pharmaceutical company) at less than the accrued amount of such liabilities. There was a gain of $601,114 on the settlement of liabilities in fiscal 2010.
In fiscal 2011,2013, we incurred $608,068$999,524 of interest expense, compared to interest expense of $489,039$857,439 in fiscal 2010.2012. This increase in interest expense is primarily due to the increase in debt associated with the acquisition of additional land for our farm operations in Tizimin, Mexico.Mexico and with the acquisition of the Camelina assets. We currently own approximately 15,80015,000 acres of land in Mexico that is subject to interest bearing mortgages, compared to approximately 8,849 acres of such land owned in 2010.
Income from Discontinued Operations. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we sold the SaveCream legacy assets related to our former, discontinued bio-pharmaceutical business. During the fiscal 2011, we recognized a loss of $574 from these discontinued operations, compared to $31,266 of income we recognized in fiscal 2010. The income from discontinued operations in fiscal 2010 was the result of foreign currency exchange rate gains on remaining liabilities associated with our former bio-pharmaceutical business, which are denominated in euros.2011.
Net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest. Our Mexico farm operations are owned through GCE Mexico I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“GCE Mexico”).Mexico. We own 50% of the common membership interests of GCE Mexico and five investors ownMexico. A third party investor currently owns the other 50% of the common membership interests. The proceeds from the sale of the preferred membership units, and from subsequent capital contributions, have been used to fund the operations of Asideros Globales Corporativo 1 (“Asideros 1”1”) and Asideros Globales Corporativo 2 (“Asideros 2”2”), each of which have acquired land in Mexico that, collectively, constitute our first two Jatropha farms. Asideros Globales Corporativo 3 (“Asideros 3”3”) acquired our third farm in October 2011, but had no impact on the results of our operations. We ownGCEH directly owns 1% of Asideros 1, Asideros 2 and Asideros 3, and the balance is owned by GCE Mexico. Accordingly, we own 50.5% of Asideros 1, Asideros 2 and Asideros 3 either directly or through our common membership interest in GCE Mexico. As such, our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Asideros farm entities. Under GCE Mexico’s LLC Agreement, losses are arethe net loss allocated from these entities to GCE Mexico is then further allocated to the members who have contributed capital and who have positive capital account balances..of GCE Mexico according to the investment balances. Accordingly, since the common membership interest did not make a capital contribution, all of the losses allocated to GCE Mexico have been further allocated to the preferred membership interest. The net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations represents the allocation of the net loss of GCE Mexico to the preferred membership interests. This net loss increased from $3,339,000 in 2012 to approximately $5,677,000 in 2013 primarily as a result of the impairment of the value of portions of the Mexico farms owned by GCE Mexico.
Net income/loss attributable to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. The Company recorded net losses of $1,921,760 and net income of $63,287 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In fiscal 2011, we incurred a loss from operations of $1,265,009, compared to a loss from operations of $2,200,518 in the prior fiscal year. The decrease in the loss from operations was due in part to the $428,577 increase in revenues and the $572,141 decrease in general and administrative expenses. However, in fiscal 2011,2012, we realized net income attributable to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. of $271,136$63,287 because of the $1,024,076a $1,013,387 gain from the settlement and write off of liabilities. Our net loss attributable to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. in fiscal 2010 was $625,287. In fiscal 2010,2013, we only realized $601,114$50,138 of gains from the settlement and write off of liabilities, which reducedliabilities. In addition, we incurred a loss in fiscal 2013 compared to net income in fiscal 2012 because (i) of the $178,896 loss on the sale of our Belize land (which land was held for investment), and (ii) because the write down of long term assets in 2013 exceeded the amount of the losses.that write down in fiscal 2012 by $1,801,089.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had $677,000$217,000 in cash and a working capital deficit of $1,726,627,$6,471,832, as compared with $1,097,000$942,000 in cash and a working capital deficit of $2,427,000$1,581,000 at December 31, 2010. The working capital deficit reported in the Annual Report for fiscal 2010 was $5,035,000. In fiscal 2010, we treated both (i) the $1,154,943 of accrued interest on our long term notes payable and (ii) the accrued return on non-controlling interest of $1,452,744 as current liabilities. Since the investors have agreed not to receive payment on the accrued interest until GCE Mexico has sufficient cash flow, and since the accrued Preferred Return will not be payable within twelve months , we have reclassified these amounts as long term liabilities.2012.
Of theThe amount of cash andor cash equivalent balances as ofheld at December 31, 2011, $255,163 represent funds to be used2013 represents cash held in our corporate accounts and our joint venture accounts. Of these amounts, only less than $10,000 was available and allocated for our general corporate purposes, with the remaining balance anticipated to be used in the operations of the Tizimin, Mexico farms owned by thatthe GCE Mexico joint venture. As a result, the GCE Mexico I, LLC funds will not be available to us for our corporate working capital or other purposes, and are not available to us to repayreduce our indebtedness.
Based on the funds we have available, and on the proceeds we expect to receive during this year from our operations, we do not believe that we have sufficient funds to pay all of our 2012 projected administrative and other operating expenses. We also do not have sufficient cash to repay all of our current liabilities should we be required to do so, nor do we have any funds available to make any capital investments.
Our cash requirements consist of cash required In order to fund (i) the corporate overhead and operating expenses of Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., and (ii) our operations at our three farms in Mexico. Our liquidity needs for each of these categories is described below:
Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. Since our inception, we have financed ourshort-term working capital needs, primarily (i) through private sales of equity and debt financing, and (ii) from fees that we will have generated by providing consulting and advisory fees to third parties related to Jatropha farm operations and the uses of Jatropha as a biofuel. In July 2011, we raised $500,000obtain additional funding from the sale of common stock which was used forassets, the sale of additional securities, additional borrowings, or from an increase in operating revenues. Outstanding indebtedness at December 31, 2013 totaled $22,629,432. The existence of the foregoing working capital purposes. Partdeficit and total current and long term liabilities may negatively impact our ability to obtain future equity or debt financing and the terms on which such additional financing, if available, can be obtained. We incurred net losses of $7,598,406 and $3,275,915 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, repectively, and have an accumulated deficit applicable to its common stockholders of $28,338,875 at December 31, 2013.
To date, we have funded our corporate overhead (the functions related to our operations in Mexico) has been funded through reimbursementand other public company costs and expenses primarily from (i) the sale of debt and equity securities, (ii) monthly payments we receivereceived from our GCE Mexico I, LLC (“GCE Mexico”).joint venture, and (iii) fees we received for providing Jatropha related advisory services to third parties. During the 2011,year ended December 31, 2013, we received overhead reimbursements of $307,428$214,734 from GCE Mexico. WeSince December 31, 2013, we have signed several advisory contracts and anticipate that the amount of reimbursement payments we will receive from GCE Mexico will increase as a result of the increase in our farm size and activities. Also, in fiscal 2011 we earned advisory fees of $260,495 from third party advisory service clients. However, while we anticipate that we will continue to generatereceive such advisory service fees in the near term, we do not have any long-term consulting agreements. Accordingly,although the amount of such fees will depend on our ability to enter into new service agreements. The amount of cash on hand and the anticipated cash receipts from GCE Mexico and the advisory fees that we may receiveservice contracts currently in 2012 is uncertain and iseffect will not expected to be sufficient to fund our total working capital needs for the next twelve months. Furthermore, we do not have sufficient financial resources to fund our business plan (which includes the expansion of our Camelina operations in the U.S., the purchase of additional biofuel farms and other capital outlays). Accordingly, unless we enter into additional advisory service agreements or otherwise receive cash proceeds, we will have to obtain additional funding in the near future from the sale of our securities to fund our cash needs. We also expectare currently in discussions regarding future advisory/management agreements with our clients that, if executed, are expected to provide us with sufficient fees to fund our projected working capital needs for at least 2015. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to enter into these new advisory/management agreements or that we will be able to raise additional capital to fund our growth capital needs. If we are able to raise additional capital, we cannot guarantee that such additional capital will be on terms favorable to the company and its stockholders.
Our business plan contemplates that we will (i) continue to develop our Jatropha business and operations (including possibly developing and cultivating our third Jatropha farm in Mexico), (ii) diversify our biofuel energy crop revenues from new revenues generated by our new Camelina operations, and(iii) increase our bio-fuel advisory and management services, as follows:
Jatropha Farm Operations. To date, revenues from our Jatropha farms located in Mexico have not been significant and have not met our expectations for various reasons, including the numerous varieties of the Jatropha trees that we planted, weather and soil conditions and cultivation techniques. We are currently addressing these issues. However, because of the time involved in replanting portions of our farms and in allowing the new trees to mature, and we do not anticipate that we will generate net revenues from the two farms that have been planted with Jatropha in the near future. The operational expenses of the Jatropha farms in Mexico are substantial and exceed the amount of revenues that the farms are expected to generate from operations in the near future. Our partner in GCE Mexico has committed to funding the cash requirements for the 2014 operating expenses of GCE Mexico. In addition, we the Mexico government has issued all required permits to our Mexico joint venture and our Mexico joint venture has re-commence the production and sale of charcoal from the vegetation we harvested during the cultivation of our farms. Sales of charcoal are expected to partially offset or operating expenses in Mexico. No assurance can, however, be given that the costs of operating the Mexico farms will not exceed our budget, that we will be able make the planned charcoal sales, or that our GCE Mexico investor will, in fact, fund the budgeted amounts.
Even if operations of the three Jatropha farms owned through GCE Mexico improve during the next year as expected, we do not project that these farms will generate sufficient cash to make cash distributions to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. for at least several more years. Under our agreements with our GCE Mexico investors, all net cash generated from the Jatropha operations that are conducted through GCE Mexico must first be used to fund the operations of those farms, and any excess must thereafter be used to repay the capital contributed by our joint venture investors (plus their preferred return). The total amount of capital and the preferred return that must be paid to our joint venture investors before funds are distributed to us is in excess of $28,800,000 as of December 31, 2013. As a result, the improving operations of the Mexico farms will not produce short-term cash or improve our liquidity, nor will the improving operations of the Mexico farms generate funds that we can use for our business plan, for working capital purposes, or for the acquisition of additional Jatropha or other biofuel feedstock farms. Because of our negative working capital position, we currently do not have the funds necessary to acquire and cultivate additional Jatropha farms for our own account. Accordingly, in order to increase our farm ownership and operations, we will have to obtain significant additional capital through the sale of equity and/or debt securities, the forward sale of Jatropha oil and carbon offset credits, and from other financing activities, such as strategic partnerships and joint ventures.
Camelina Operations. In March 2013, we acquired the business and assets of Sustainable Oils, LLC, a company that has been engaged in developing Camelina products since 2007. Sustainable Oils has generated over $20 million in revenues during the past three years, but has incurred losses of approximately $5.8 million during that time. The new Camelina operations will require a significant amount of additional cash to scale up its operations and to reach profitable operations. Our goal is to operate the Camelina business that we acquired through a new subsidiary. Furthermore, our goal is to fund the operations and expansion of the Camelina operations with new debt or equity that we intend to raise specifically for the Camelina subsidiary. In the first quarter of 2014, our Camelina subsidiary raised $130,000 in bridge financing from three investors by issuing its convertible promissory notes. The promissory notes bear interest at a rate of 8% per annum, mature on December 31, 2014, and are convertible into capital stock of our Camelina subsidiary. In order to induce the investors to purchase the convertible notes, we issued to those investors warrants to purchase a total of 1,083,332 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $.012 per share. In addition, we granted the three investors the right to “put” (sell) the convertible note shares of our Camelina subsidiary to us commencing at the end of 2018 for the price equal to the price that they paid for their convertible notes. If the “put” is exercised and we are required to purchase the shares of our subsidiary, we will have the right to pay for those shares in cash or in shares of our common stock having a fair market value equal to the cash price. The proceeds from the foregoing bridge financing will be used to fund the working capital needs of the Camelina subsidiary. While we have been in discussions with a number of sources for additional funding, we have not entered into any binding arrangements for the desired amount of new funding. No assurance can be given that we will obtain the additional capital necessary to operate and grow our new Camelina operations. In the event that we do not obtain the necessary amount of financing to properly operate and scale up our new Camelina operations, those operations are expected to continue to operate at a loss.
As partial consideration for the Camelina assets that we purchased in March 2013, we issued a $1,300,000 promissory note. The promissory note bears simple interest at the rate of ten percent (10.0%) per annum, and was payable upon the earlier of the following: (a) to the extent of 35.1% of, and on the third business day after a Qualified (equity) Funding; or (b) September 13, 2014. The term “Qualified Funding” means all equity funding in excess of the $800,000, in the aggregate, received by us for our Camelina business. Our obligations under the promissory note are secured by a first priority lien on certain tangible assets included in the purchase of the Camelina assets. The promissory note is a full recourse obligation. However, the holder of the promissory note has agreed that if the holder has to pursue the collection of amounts due under the promissory note, the holder will not seize or take any action to collect any amounts due and owing against any of the Company’s assets (including its cash) related to a line of business other than the Camelina business. In September 2014, we renegotiated the terms of the note and agreed to return certain tangible assets that constituted the collateral under the promissory note to the holder of the promissory note in exchange for a reduction of the amount owed under the promissory note and an extension of the maturity date to December 31, 21014. The promissory note is no longer secured by any tangible assets.
Bio-fuel Advisory and Management Services. We have recently entered into several bio-fuel advisory and management service agreements with third parties pursuant to which we are paid fees for providing Jatropha or Camelina bio-fuels development services. The fees that we have generated from these agreements have materially supplemented our other sources of revenues. Because of the longer lead times before our Jatropha and Camelina bio-fuel operations generate revenues for us, we need these advisory/management fees to supplement our revenues and to defray our overhead expenses. Accordingly, we are actively seeking additional advisory/management agreements.
Other Potential Source of Liquidity.
We are entitled to receive royalty payments from the legacy pharmaceutical assets we sold in 2009 to Curadis GmbH. In February 2012, Curadis GmbH informed us that it has licensed certain of the technologies that we sold to it, and, as a result that we will be receiving a royalty of 4.5% of all net sales of products sold using the licensed technology. WeCertain of the intellectual property that we sold to Curadis will revert to us if royalties from those assets do not exceed 300,000 euros by December 31, 2014. In 2012, we received our first payment $19,653$24,921 from Curadis under this new licensing arrangementarrangement. Only $903 of royalty payments were received in March 2012. The foregoing revenues that we anticipate receiving during2013.
We presently do not have any available credit, bank financing or other external sources of liquidity. In the next twelve months are not, however, expected to be sufficient to fund our projected working capital needs forabsence of additional outside funding (including proceeds from the next twelve months. Accordingly, we anticipate that we will have to obtain additional equity financing in 2012 to fund our anticipated working capital deficit.
As of March 19, 2012, we have not consummated any portionsale of our targeted equity raise for 2012, and we have not identified the sources for all of the required equity. Certain investors may be unwilling to invest in our securities, since we are traded on the OTC Bulletin Board and not on a national securities exchange, particularly if there is only limited trading in our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board at the time we seek financing. The volume and frequency of such trading has been limited to date. There is no assurance that sufficient funding through a financing will be available to us at acceptable terms or at all. Any additional funding that we obtain in a financing is likely to reduce the percentage ownership of the company held by our existing securityholders. The amount of this dilution may be substantial based on the trading price of our common stock. If we do not raise additional funds, we may be required to reduce or otherwise restructure our operations.
In 2009, we purchased all of the outstanding capital stock of Technology Alternatives Limited, a company formed under the laws of Belize (“TAL”), from its four shareholders. TAL, now our wholly-owned subsidiary, owns a 400-acre farm in subtropical Belize, Central America, which was used for Jatropha farming purposes. We paid part of the purchase price of TAL by issuing four promissory notes to the four former owners. These notes are secured by a lien on the 400-acre farm and have an aggregate initial principal balance of $516,139 Belize Dollars (approximately U.S. $258,000 based on exchange rates in effect at March 13, 2012). The maturity on the notes have been extended until August 16, 2012. We have determined that the operation of the Belizean farm is not economical given its small size and remote location and was not an efficient use of corporate capital. Therefore, we have ceased operations at that farm and have relocated its research and farm assets to our Mexico farms. We have reclassified the Belizean farm as an investment property and are currently attempting to sell the property. If the land is sold, the net proceeds are expected to be sufficient to repay the outstanding four secured notes and to provide us with additional proceeds. The excess of the net sales proceeds, if the property is sold, will be used for our working capital purposes.
GCE Mexico I, LLC. Our business plan calls for us to acquire, develop and operate large Jatropha farms for the purpose of harvesting Jatropha oil for use as a bio-fuel. The cost of acquiring and developing these farms significantly exceeds our current funding capabilities. Accordingly, we have funded the acquisition of the three Mexico Jatropha farms through the GCE Mexicoentering into other joint venture. We currently own 50% of the issued and outstanding common membership units of GCE Mexico. The remaining 50% in common membership units were issued to five investors affiliated with two of our largest stockholders. In addition, preferred membership units were issued to two affiliates of our two largest stockholders. As of March 16, 2012, the unaffiliated members of GCE Mexico have contributed a total of $20million to GCE Mexico since the formation of that entity. Distributions of available cash from GCE Mexico will first be used to return the foregoing capital contributions and financing, plus an annual 12% preferred return on the contributed capital(excluding the notes payable of $5.1 million), and are then expected to be distributed 50% to this company, and 50% to the investors. Because the three Jatropha farms owned through GCE Mexico are new farms (only one of which is expected to generate significant revenues in 2012)venture relationships), we do not project that cash distributions will be made to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. for several years.
The operations of the farms owned through GCE Mexico have, to date, been funded (i) primarily by the foregoing capital contributions made by the third party investors in GCE Mexico and, (ii) to a lesser extent, by government subsidies and by revenues generated by that entity (the farms have generated some revenues from the sale of biomass and oil). The first of the three farms owned through GCE Mexico is expected to commence generating revenues from the commercial sale of Jatropha oil during 2012 (mostly in the fall of 2012). Because the GCE Mexico operations are new and the 2012 harvests will be the first commercial harvest, we are unable to estimate the amount of revenues that GCE Mexico may generate from its operations. However, the revenues from the first farm will not be sufficient to pay the operating costs of GCE Mexico in 2012. We have submitted a budget to the third party investors of GCE Mexico for the 2012 operating expenses of GCE Mexico, and the principal investors of GCE Mexico have acknowledged their intent to contribute sufficient additional funds to pay the budgeted cash requirements during 2012. Based on these assurances, we anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to operate our Mexico farms in 2012. No assurance can, however, be given that the costs of operating the Mexico farms will not exceed our budget or that our investors will, in fact, fund the budgeted amounts.
In fiscal 2012, we purchased approximately 5,557 acres of additional farmland in Mexico through GCE Mexico. The purchase of that land was financed through a $2,095,525 mortgage loan. As a result, the purchase of the land did not negatively impact our current liquidity. We anticipate that we may make additional land purchases in Mexico through the GCE Mexico joint venture.
Other Liquidity Needs. Our business plan also calls us to purchase our own Jatropha farms (in Mexico, or elsewhere). Any such additional farms will require a significant infusion of additional capital. Because of our negative working capital position, we currently do not have the funds necessaryability to expand our business or acquire and cultivate additional farms solely for our own account. In order to purchase Jatropha farms for our own account, or to acquire or build facilities to process our own Jatropha oil,other biofuel feedstock farms. If we will have to obtain significant additional capital through the sale of equity and/or debt securities, the forward sale of Jatropha oil and carbon offset credits, and from other financing activities. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain sufficient capital from these sources. The trading price of our common stock and the downturn in the equity and debt markets are expected to make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. The sale ofissue additional equity or debt securities to fund our future capital needs, stockholders may result in furtherexperience additional dilution to our existing stockholders, andor the new equity securities that we may issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. IfShould we fail to increase the amount of revenues we receive from our advisory services and/or raise additional financing is not availabledebt or is not available on acceptable terms,equity funding, we will not be ablehave to completematerially scale back our business plancurrent and expandproposed operations or take other actions to preserve our operations as planned.on-going operations. Any such action will have a materially adverse effect on an investment in our common stock.
Inflation and changing prices have had no effect on our continuing operations duringover our two most recent fiscal years.
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a) of Regulation S-K.
Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company.”
Financial Statements are referred to in Item 15, listed in the Index to Financial Statements and filed and included elsewhere herein as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
None.In connection with the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, we had a disagreement with Anton & Chia regarding our fee arrangement and, as discussed below, with certain accounting principles or practices. Anton & Chia met with the audit committee of our Board of Directors, but did not report on any disagreements regarding any accounting matters. After Anton & Chia’s meeting with the audit committee, a dispute arose with Anton & Chia regarding our fee arrangement. Thereafter, Anton & Chia notified the Company that there were disagreements regarding our financial statements. On April 15, 2014, Anton & Chia informed us that it has resigned in an e-mail that read, in its entirety, as follows: “Take this email as our resignation.”
Because Anton & Chia was engaged in October 2013, Anton & Chia had not previously issued an accountant's report on any of our financial statements. Accordingly, during the past two years we did not receive any report from Anton & Chia that contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. HBM’s accountant’s report on our financial statements for the prior two years ended December 31, 2012 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and was not modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that there was an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a “going concern.” In addition, there were no reportable events of the type described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended, the “Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer (“Certifying Officers”), to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report, our Certifying Officers evaluated the effectiveness of management’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2011,2013, in accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Certifying Officers concluded that management’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2011.2013.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is intended to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
Management, with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2011,2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2011,2013, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm as such attestation is not required for non-accelerated filers such as us pursuant to applicable SEC rules.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20112013 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.PART III
The following table sets forth the name, age and position held by each of our executive officers and directors. Directors are elected for a period of one year and thereafter serve until the next annual meeting at which their successors are duly elected by the stockholders.
| Name | | Age | | Position |
David R. Walker (1) | 67 | | 71 | | Chairman of the Board |
| Richard Palmer | 51 | | 53 | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Gregory S. Cardenas | 51 | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
Martin Wenzel(1) | 53 | | 56 | | Director |
| Donna Reilly | | | 45 | | Chief Financial Officer |
___________________________| (1) | Member of our Audit Committee |
Business Experience and Directorships
The following describes the backgrounds of current executive officers and directors. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Walker and Mr. Wenzel . Bernstein are independent directors as defined in the Nasdaq rules governing members of boards of directors.
David R. Walker
David R. Walker joined the Board of Directors on May 2, 1996, and was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors on May 10, 1998. He has served as Chairman of the Audit Committee since its establishment in 2001. For over 20 years, Mr. Walker has been the General Manager of Sunheaven Farms, the largest onion growing and packing entity in the State of Washington. In the capacity of General Manager, Mr. Walker performs the functions of a traditional chief financial officer. Mr. Walker holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from Brigham Young University with minors in accounting and finance.
The Board believes that Mr. Walker’s experience regarding the operation and management of large-scale agricultural farms and his experience as a financial officer are valuable resources to our Board in formulating business strategy, addressing business opportunities and resolving operational issues that arise from time to time.
Richard Palmer
Richard Palmer was appointed as our President and Chief Operating Officer in September 2007, and been a member of the Board of Directors since September 2007. Mr. Palmer became our Chief Executive Officer on December 21, 2007. Mr. Palmer has over 25 years of hands-on experience in the energy field, holding senior level management positions with a number of large engineering, development, operations and construction companies. He is a co-founder of Mobius Risk Group, LLC, an energy risk advisory services consulting company, and was a principal and Executive Vice President of that consulting company from January, 2002 until September 2007. From 1997 to 2002, Mr. Palmer was a Senior Director at Enron Energy Services. Prior thereto, from 1995 to 1996 Mr. Palmer was a Vice President of Bentley Engineering, and a Senior Vice President of Southland Industries from 1993 to 1996. Mr. Palmer received his designation as a Certified Energy Manager in 1999, holds two Business Management Certificates from University of Southern California’s Business School, and is an active member of both the American Society of Plant Biologists, and the International Tropical Farmers Association.Association and the Union of Concerned Scientists. Mr. Palmer is Trustee & President of the Center for Sustainable Energy Farming (CFSEF), a non-profit research institute dedicated to sustainable communities, fueled by socially-responsible clean energy. In February 2013, Mr. Palmer joined the RSB Services Foundation's Board of Directors and held the Chairman role from April until December 2013. RSB Services acted as the implementing entity of the Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels (RSB) sustainability certification until December 2013.
Over the last 25 years, Mr. Palmer has held senior level management positions with a number of large engineering, development, operations and construction companies, and, as a result, he has garnered a wealth of experience in the energy field. Mr. Palmer’s experience is important to the development and execution of the Company’s business plan. Mr. Palmer is the only member of management who serves as a director of the Company.
Martin Wenzel
Martin Wenzel joined our Board of Directors in April 2010, and serves on the Board’s audit committee. Mr. Wenzel is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of Colorado Energy, the operating entity of Bicent Power, LLC, which is a privately owned limited liability company that owns and operates power generating stations in Colorado, Montana and California. From 2005 until August 2007, he served as the Senior Vice President (Sales and Marketing) of Miasole Inc. Prior thereto, from 2001 to 2004, Mr. Wenzel was President and Chief Executive Officer of Alpha Energy LLC. He is also a member of the Board of the Deming Center of Entrepreneurship at the University of Colorado. Mr. Wenzel holds an Executive MBA from Columbia Business School; a MastersMaster’s degree in Systems Management from the University of Southern California; and a BachelorsBachelor’s degree in Engineering and Management from the US Naval Academy.
Mr. Wenzel has an extensive background in the energy industry, including over 25 years of developing, constructing and operating energy projects, marketing energy commodities and operating energy assets in the U.S. and internationally. The Board concluded that Mr. Wenzel’s expertise in energy policy and alternative energy technologies is a valuable asset for the Board of Directors of the Company.
Gregory S. CardenasDonna Reilly
Gregory S. CardenasDonna Reilly was appointed as our newChief Executive Vice PresidentOfficer on March 19, 2014. Ms. Reilly joined Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. in January 2010 as our Accounting Manager and was later promoted to Controller in 2011. From June 2005 to January 2010, Ms. Reilly was an Accounting Manager at Automotive Information Network. Additionally, Ms. Reilly was an auditor at Deloitte & Touch, LLP for over four years. Ms. Reilly received her B.S. in Accounting from National University and is a certified public accountant.
Richard Palmer and Donna Reilly currently also serve as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in November 2012.respectively, for each of our subsidiaries. Mr. Cardenas has over 25 years experience in finance and development, and has successfully arranged over $8 billion in project financings for leading U.S. project developers involved in power generation, natural gas transportation, storage and electrical distribution inPalmer is the United States and in emerging markets. Mr. Cardenas is a California CPA and holds a Masterssole director of Business Taxation and a Masters of Business Administration from Golden Gate University.our subsidiaries.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholdersstockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on information provided to us by our officers and our review of copies of reporting forms received by us, we believe that during fiscal year ended December 31, 2011,2013, our current officers and directors complied with the filing requirements under Section 16(a).
Code of Ethics
Our Board of Directors has adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officers, principal financial officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions (“Code of Ethics”). A copy of our Code of Ethics will be furnished without charge to any person upon written request. Requests should be sent to: Secretary, Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., 100 W. Broadway,2790 Skypark Drive, Suite 650, Long Beach,105, Torrance, California 90802.90505.
Board Committees
Our Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, but does not currently have a Compensation Committee or a Nominating Committee.
The Audit Committee meets periodically with management and with our independent registered public accounting firm to, among other things, review the results of the annual audit and quarterly reviews and discuss the financial statements. The audit committee also hires the independent registered public accounting firm, and receives and considers the accountant’s comments as to controls, adequacy of staff and management performance and procedures. The Audit Committee is also authorized to review related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011,2013, Dave Walker and Martin Wenzel constituted all of the members of the Audit Committee. Both Mr. Walker and Mr.Dr. Wenzel were non-employee directors and independent as defined under the Nasdaq Stock Market’s listing standards. As Mr. Walker has significant knowledge of financial matters, theand our Board has designated Mr. Walker as the “audit committee financial expert” of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met four times during fiscal 20112013 in connection with this Annual Report and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB. The Audit Committee operates under a formal charter that governs its duties and conduct.
Summary Compensation Table.
The following table setsets forth certain information concerning the annual and long-term compensation for services rendered to us in all capacities for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20102013 and 20112012 of all persons who served as our principal executive officer and principal financial officer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. No2013 and for any other executive officersofficer who earned annual compensation during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 that exceeded2013 greater than $100,000. The principalSince no other executive officer andearned more than $100,000 in 2013, our Chief Executive Officer (who during part of 2013 also served as our Acting Chief Financial Officer) is the other named officers are collectively referred to as thesole “Named Executive Officers.”Officer” of this company. Donna Reilly, currently our Chief Financial Officer, was appointed on March 19, 2014 and, accordingly, was not an executive officer in 2013.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position | | Fiscal Year Ended 12/31 | | Salary Paid or Accrued ($) | | Bonus Paid or Accrued ($) | | Stock Awards ($) | | Option Awards ($) | | | All Other Compensation ($) | | Total ($) |
| Richard Palmer | | 2011 | | 250,000 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | 22,800 | | 272,800 |
| | | 2010 | | 250,000 | | 250,000 | | 0 | | 0 | | | 23,400 | | 523,200 |
| Gregory Cardenas(2) | | 2011 | | 23,700 | | | | | | | | | | | 23,700 |
| Bruce Nelson(1) | | 2011 | | 149,573 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | 10,000 | | 159,573 |
| | | 2010 | | 175,000 | | 175,000 | | 0 | | 0 | | | 12,000 | | 362,000 |
________________________
(1) Bruce Nelson resigned as our Chief Financial Officer on November 15, 2011. Accordingly, all information set forth herein represents compensation he received through that date.
(2) Gregory Cardenas was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer on November 16, 2011. The information set forth in the above table represents compensation paid to Mr. Cardenas during the period between November 16, 2011 and December 31, 2011.
Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year Ended 12/31 | | Salary Paid or Accrued ($) | | Bonus Paid or Accrued ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | | Total ($) | |
| Richard Palmer | 2013 | | | 250,000 | | | | | | | | 250,000 | |
| | 2012 | | | 250,000 | | | | | | | | 250,000 | |
Stock Option Grant
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2011,2013, concerning unexercised options, unvested stock and equity incentive plan awards for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.our sole Named Executive Officer.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20112013
| | | Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| Name | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | | Option Exercise Price ($) | | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Richard Palmer | | | 6,000,000 | | | | | | | | 0.03 | | 8/20/2012 | | | | |
| | | | 6,000,000 | | | | | | | | 0.03 | | 8/20/2012 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 6,000,000 | | | | | 0.02 | | 3/16/2020 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 6,000,000 | | | | | 0.02 | | 3/16/2020 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gregory Cardenas | | | 500,000 | | | | 1,500,000 3,000,000 | | | | | 0.037 0.037 0.037 | | 11/14/2021 11/14/2021 11/14/2014 | | | | |
| Bruce Nelson | | | 500,000 | | | | | | | | | 0.05 | | 3/20/2018 | | | | |
| | | | 500,000 | | | | | | | | | 0.05 | | 3/20/2018 | | | | |
| | | | 500,000 | | | | | | | | | 0.05 | | 3/20/2018 | | | | |
| | | | 500,000 | | | | | | | | | 0.05 | | 3/20/2018 | | | | |
| | | | 1,250,000 | | | | | | | | | 0.05 | | 3/20/2013 | | | | |
| | | | 1,250,000 | | | | | | | | | 0.05 | | 3/20/2013 | | | | |
Director Compensation.| | | Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| Name | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | | Option Exercise Price ($) | | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Richard Palmer | | | | | | 6,000,000 | | | | | 0.02 | | 3/16/2020 | | | | |
| | | | 3,250,000 | | | | 6,000,000 | | | | | 0.02 0.01 | | 3/16/2020 12/31/2012 | | | | |
Director Compensation.
Pursuant to our Board of Directors adopted a compensation policy for non-employee directors (“Compensation Policy”), effective as of July 1, 2009. Pursuant toDirectors’ the Compensation Policy, non-employee directors will beare entitled to receive the following benefits, among others, in consideration for their services as directors of the Company:
| · | Monthly cash payments of $2,000; |
| · | Annual grants of non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock; |
| · | Participation in the Company’s stock option plans; and |
| · | Reimbursement of certain expenses incurred in connection with attendance of meetings of the Board and Board Committee. |
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid to each of our non-employee directors during fiscal 20112013 for their services rendered as directors. The compensation of Richard Palmer, who currently serves as a director and as our President and Chief Executive Officer (and who served as our Acting Chief Financial Officer during 2013), is described above in the Summary Compensation Table.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 20112013
| Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | Stock Awards | | Option Awards(1)(2) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | All Other Compensation | | Total | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Awards | Option Awards(1)(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | All Other Compensation | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David R. Walker | | | 24,000 | | | | | 14,500 | | | | | | 38,500 | | 24,000 | | 42,500 | | | | 66,500 |
| Richard Palmer | | | - | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | - | | - | | | | - |
| Martin Wenzel | | | 24,000 | | | | | 14,500 | | | | | | 38,500 | | 24,000 | | 10,000 | | | | 34,000 |
| Total | | | 48,000 | | | | | 29,000 | | | | | | 77,000 | | 48,000 | | 52,500 | | | | 100,500 |
| (1) | This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. For additional information on the valuation assumptions with respect to the option grants, refer to Note 98 of our financial statements in this Annual Report. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named directors from these awards. |
| (2) | Pursuant to the company’s director compensation, each non-employee director is entitled to an annual grant of options to acquire 500,000 shares. Each director received options to acquire 500,000 shares of the company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.029$0.01 per share, effective July 1, 2011 |
(3) | Dr. Bernstein resigned as a director on November 15, 2011.2013. |
Employment Agreements
Richard Palmer. On September 7, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”“Employment Agreement”) with Richard Palmer, pursuant to which we hired Mr. Palmer to serve as our President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer. Mr. Palmer wascurrently also appointed to serveserved as director on our Board of Directors to serveActing Chief Financial Officer from June 1, 2013 until the next election of directors by our shareholders. Upon the resignation of our prior Chief Executive Officer in December 2007, Mr. Palmer also became our Chief Executive Officer.
March 19, 2014. Under the Employment Agreement, we granted Mr. Palmer an incentive option to purchase up to 12,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.03 (the trading price on the date the agreement was signed), subject to our achievement of certain market capitalization goals. The option expires after five years. As of April 22, 2009, all 12,000,000 shares under the option remained unvested. On April 22, 2009, our Board of Directors approved accelerating the vesting of all 12,000,000 unvested shares under the option, and accelerated the release from escrowwhich have expired as of 652,503 shares of restricted common stock issuable to Mr. Palmer under the Global Agreement. As a result, on that date, all of the restricted and escrowed shares were released to Mr. Palmer.December 31, 2013.
In addition, Mr. Palmer’s compensation package includes a base salary of $250,000, and a bonus payment contingent on Mr. Palmer’s satisfaction of certain performance criteria, which will not exceed 100% of Mr. Palmer’s base salary. In the event that (i) we terminate Mr. Palmer’s employment for reasons other than “cause” (as defined in the Employment Agreement to include material breaches by him of the agreement, fraud, misappropriation of funds or embezzlement), or if (ii) Mr. Palmer resigns because we breached the Employment Agreement, we will be obligated to pay Mr. Palmer an amount equal to one (1) times his then-current annual base salary plus fifty percent (50%) of the target bonus in effect on the date of his termination. However, if Mr. Palmer’s employment is terminated for death or disability, or if Mr. Palmer resigns or is terminated for “cause,” he will not be entitled to receive any severance payments or other post-employment benefits. The original term of the Employment Agreement commenced September 1, 2007, and was scheduled to expire on September 30, 2010.
On March 16, 2010, the Company and Richard Palmer entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement. Pursuant to the Amendment, the Company extended the term of Mr. Palmer’s employment for an additional two years, i.e., through September 30, 2012. Thereafter, the2013. The term of employment shallthe Employment Agreement automatically renewrenews for successive one-year periods unless otherwise terminated. In connection with the Amendment, the Company and Mr. Palmer entered into an option agreement (“Option Agreement”Agreement”). Pursuant to the Option Agreement, the Company granted Mr. Palmer a new option to acquire up to 12,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.02, subject to the Company’s achievement of certain market capitalization goals. The new option expires after ten (10) years.
Greg S. Cardenas. Effective November 16, 2011, we entered into a binding term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with Gregory S. Cardenas, pursuant to which Mr. Cardenas agreed to serve as our new Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Under the Term Sheet, Mr. Cardenas is entitled to: (i) receive an annual salary of $175,000; and (ii) a grant under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan of a 10-year incentive stock option to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.037 per share, which was the closing market price of our common stock on November 15, 2011. The option (i) vested as to 500,000 shares on November 16, 2011 and (ii) will vest as to the remaining 1,500,000 shares, in 30 equal successive monthly installments commencing on May 31, 2012, provided, in each case, that Mr. Cardenas remains in our continuous employ through such vesting date, and will be on such other terms set forth in our standard form of stock option agreement.
Additionally, Mr. Cardenas was granted a three-year stock option under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.037 per share (i.e., the closing market price of our common stock on November 15, 2011). Such option will vest (i) as to 1,500,000 shares, if and when the Company’s Market Capitalization (as defined) reaches $75,000,000, and (ii) as to the remaining 1,500,000 shares, if and when the Company’s Market Capitalization reaches or exceeds $120,000,000.
Mr. Cardenas will also be eligible under the Term Sheet to: (i) receive an annual bonus (as determined by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors) of up to 50% of his annual salary, which bonus amount may be increased and the timing of payment accelerated under certain circumstances set forth in the Term Sheet; (ii) participate in all Company benefit plans in effect for our executive employees from time to time; (iii) receive coverage under any director and officer liability insurance policy maintained by us for services rendered by Mr. Cardenas to us, our subsidiaries and affiliates during the term of his employment; and (iv) receive three weeks of paid vacation per year during the first two years of his employment, and four weeks of paid vacation per year thereafter.
The Term Sheet provides that upon termination of Mr. Cardenas’ employment without “cause” (as defined) by us (i) before the sixth month anniversary of the effective date of his employment, Mr. Cardenas will be entitled to a severance payment of one month of salary from the date of termination, or (ii) on or after the sixth month anniversary of the effective date of his employment, Mr. Cardenas will be entitled to a severance payment of three months of salary from the date of termination.
ITEM 12.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 16, 2012November 3, 2014 by (a) each person known by us to own beneficially 5% or more of each class of our outstanding voting shares (i.e. our common stock and our Series B Preferred Stock), (b) each of our named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table and each of our directors and (c) all executive officers and directors of this company as a group. As of March 16, 2012,November 3, 2014, there were 285,062,812339,187,545, shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. As of the same date, there were 13,000 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, which shares of preferred stock were convertible into an aggregate of 11,818,181 shares of common stock. Unless otherwise noted, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all the shares beneficially owned by them.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) | | Shares Beneficially Owned (2) | | Percent of Class of Common Stock |
Preferred Stock: | | | | |
Corporativo LODEMO S.A DE CV Calle 18, #201-B x 23 y 25, Colonias Garcia Gineres, C.P. 97070 Merida, Yucatan, Mexico | | 9,090,908(3) | | 3.25% |
| | | | | |
Greenrock Capital Holdings LLC 10531 Timberwood Circle, Suite D Louisville, Kentucky 40223 | | 2,727,273(4) | | 1.00% |
| | | | | |
| Common Stock: | | | | |
Roll Energy Investments LLC 11444 West Olympic Boulevard, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90064 | | 33,094,500(5) | | 11.60% |
| | | | | |
Michael Zilkha 1001 McKinney, Suite 1900 Houston TX 77002 | | 39,635,000(6) | | 13.90% |
| | | | | |
| Directors/Named Executive Officers: | | | | |
| Richard Palmer | | 72,030,241 (7) | | 25.50% |
| David R. Walker | | 2,653,539 (9) | | * |
| Gregory S. Cardenas | | 500,000 (10) | | * |
| Martin Wenzel | | 1,000,000 (11) | | * |
| | | | | |
| All Named Executive Officers and Directors as a group (5 persons) | | 76,183,780 | | 25.50% |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) | | Shares Beneficially Owned (2) | | Percent of Class of Common Stock |
Preferred Stock: | | | | |
Corporativo LODEMO S.A DE CV Calle 18, #201-B x 23 y 25, Colonias Garcia Gineres, C.P. 97070 Merida, Yucatan, Mexico | | 9,090,908(3) | | 2.68% |
| | | | |
Greenrock Capital Holdings LLC 10531 Timberwood Circle, Suite D Louisville, Kentucky 40223 | | 2,727,273(4) | | .80% |
| | | | |
| Common Stock: | | | | |
Targeted Growth, Inc. 2815 Eastlake Ave E, Suite 300 Seattle WA 98102 | | 40,000,000 | | 11.79% |
| | | | | |
Roll Energy Investments LLC 11444 West Olympic Boulevard, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90064 | | 33,044,500(5) | | 11.22% |
| | | | | |
Michael Zilkha 1001 McKinney, Suite 1900 Houston TX 77002 | | 42,755,690(6) | | 12.61% |
| | | | | |
| Directors/Named Executive Officers: | | | | |
| Richard Palmer | | 75,280,240(7) | | 22.19% |
| David R. Walker | | 5,153,539 (8) | | * |
| Martin Wenzel | | 2,000,000 (9) | | * |
| Donna Reilly | | _______ | | * |
| All Named Executive Officers and Directors as a group (4 persons) | | 83,433,779 (10) | | 24.60% |
* Less than 1%
(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each person listed is c/o Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., 100 W. Broadway, Suite 650, Long Beach,2790 Skypark Drive, Torrance, California, 90802.90505.
(2) For purposes of this table, shares of common stock are considered beneficially owned if the person directly or indirectly has the sole or shared power to vote or direct the voting of the securities or the sole or shared power to dispose of or direct the disposition of the securities. Shares of common stock are also considered beneficially owned if a person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of the shares upon exercise or conversion of a security within 60 days of March 24, 2011.November 3, 2014.
(3) Consists of 9,090,908 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the conversion of shares of Series B Preferred Stock. Corporativo LODEMO owns 10,000 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock, which represents approximately 76.92% of the issued and outstanding shares of that class of securities.
(4) Consists of 2,727,273 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon the conversion of shares of Series B Preferred Stock. Greenrock owns 3,000 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock, which represents approximately 23.08% of the issued and outstanding shares of that class of securities.
(5) Includes (i) 945,000 shares that may be acquired upon exercise of currently exercisable warrants, and (ii) 9,450,000 shares issuable upon conversion of an outstanding convertible promissory note. The common shares, warrants and convertible note disclosed herein are directly owned by Roll Energy Investments LLC (“Roll LLC”). However, Stewart Resnick is the sole manager of Roll LLC and, as a result of his control over Roll LLC, he is deemed to beneficially own the securities held by Roll LLC.
(6) Includes (i) 945,000 shares that may be acquired upon exercise of currently exercisable warrants, and (ii) 9,450,000 shares issuable upon conversion of an outstanding convertible promissory note.
(7) Consists of 12,000,00060,030,240 outstanding shares and 15,250,000 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of currently exercisable options. Mr. Palmer also has options to acquire 12,000,000 shares of common stock that are not currently exercisable and will not become exercisable unless certain conditions are met.
(9)(8) Includes 1,750,0004,750,000 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options.
(10)(9) Consists of 500,0002,000,000 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options.
(10) Includes 22,000,000 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options.
(11) Includes 500,000 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Roll Energy Investments LLC (“Roll LLC”LLC”) and Michael Zilkha are our largest stockholders, and each presently owns more than 10% of our common stock. Stewart Resnick is the sole manager of Roll LLC and, as a result of his control over Roll LLC, he is deemed to beneficially own the securities held by Roll LLC.
Our principal asset and our three operating Jatropha farms are owned in a joint venture in which both Mr. Resnick and Mr. Zilkha were principals during 2013. As noted elsewhere in this report, we currently own 50% of the issued and outstanding common membership units of GCE Mexico, with the remaining 50% currently held by fivefour other investors (the “Common Members”). Additionally, two investorsMr. Zilkha (the “Preferred Members”Member”) owncurrently owns all of the preferred membership units of GCE Mexico. Until December 2013, Mr. Resnick iswas affiliated with one of the Common Members and one of the Preferred Members.Members, and Mr. Zilkha iswas affiliated with four of the Common Members and the other Preferred Member. In December 2013, Mr. Zilkha acquired all of Mr. Resnick’s interests in GCE Mexico. The Preferred Members areMember is entitled to a preferential 12% per annum cumulative compounded return on their investment in GCE Mexico.
On October 19, 2011, the two Preferred Members made a $2,095,525 loan to GCE Mexico to purchase 5,557 acres of additional land in Mexico for the development of an additional Jatropha farm. The loan is secured by the land and bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. In addition, in fiscal 2011 the Preferred Members contribute an additional $5 million to GCE Mexico to fund its operations.
As of March 16, 2012,November 3, 2014, the Preferred Members have contributed a total of $15,471,000$22,112,000 to GCE Mexico. The two Preferred Members also directly funded the purchase by GCE Mexico’s operating subsidiariesMexico of the land in the State of Yucatan in Mexico on which the GCE Mexico three farms are located. The purchase of land for the three farms was funded by mortgage loans, which cumulatively had an initial principal balance of $5,110,189. The mortgages bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum, and interest is payable on a quarterly basis to the extent the borrower has sufficient cash flow. The three mortgages, including any unpaid interest, become due in April 2018, February 2019,2020, June 2021 and October 2021.
Additionally, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with the preferred members pursuant to which the Company issued senior unsecured convertible promissory notes in the original aggregate principal amount of $567,000 and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 1,890,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Convertible Notes mature on the earlier of (i) March 16, 2012, or (ii) upon written demand of payment by the note holders following the Company’s default thereunder. The maturity date of the Convertible Notes may be extended by written notice made by the note holders at any time prior to March 16, 2012. These notes have been extended to September 2013. Interest accrues on the convertible notes at a rate of 5.97% per annum, and is payable quarterly in cash, in arrears, on each nine-month anniversary of the issuance of the convertible notes.
Director Independence
Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board and OTCQB Market under the symbol “GCEH.”Market. Neither the OTC Bulletin Board electronic trading platform nor the OTCQB Market maintains any standards regarding the “independence” of the directors on our company’s Board of Directors, and we are not otherwise subject to the requirements of any national securities exchange or an inter-dealer quotation system with respect to the need to have a majority of our directors be independent.
In the absence of such requirements, we have elected to use the definition for “director independence” under the Nasdaq Stock Market’s listing standards, which defines an “independent director” as “a person other than an officer or employee of us or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship, which in the opinion of our Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.” The definition further provides that, among others, employment of a director by us (or any parent or subsidiary of ours) at any time during the past three years is considered a bar to independence regardless of the determination of our Board of Directors.
Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Walker and Mr. Wenzel are independent directors as defined in the Nasdaq rules relating to director independence. Each of Mr. Walker and Mr. Wenzel are non-employee directors.
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees accrued by Hansen, BarnettOn April 15, 2014 Anton & Maxwell. P.C. duringChia resigned as our independent registered public accounting firm and on September 16, 2014, the fiscalaudit committee appointed Hartley Moore Accountancy Corporation (“Hartley Moore”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 20112013. Hartley Moore has audited our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The following is a summary of the fees billed, or expected to be billed, to the Company by Hartley Moore, Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell and 2010Anton & Chia for professional services rendered for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. These fees are for work performed related to the years indicated and, in some instances, we have estimated the fees for services rendered but not yet billed.
| 2013 | | Audit Fees | | | Audit Related Fees | | Tax Fees | | | Total Fees | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell | | $ | 62,329 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 62,329 | |
| Anton & Chia | | $ | 10,000 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 10,000 | |
| Hartley Moore | | $ | 36,750 | | | $ | 800 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 37,550 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2012 | | Audit Fees | | | Audit Related Fees | | Tax Fees | | | Total Fees | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell | | $ | 76,772 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 7,100 | | | $ | 83,872 | |
Audit Fees:
Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of ourthe Company’s annual financial statements and the review of the interim financial statements included in our Forms 10-Qthe Company’s Quarterly Reports (together, the “Financial Statements” ) and SECfor services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings were $ 80,936 and $53,500 respectively.or engagements.
Audit-Related FeesFees:
Consists of fees billed for assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit or review of the Financial Statements (defined above).
Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell. P.C. did not provide and did not bill and it was not paid any fees for, audit-related services in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Tax FeesFees:
Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell. P.C. did not provide, and did not bill and was not paid anyConsists of fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.planning.
All Other FeesFees:
Consists of fees billed for other products and services not described above.
Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell. P.C. did not provide, and did not bill and were not paid any fees for, any other services in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Consistent with SEC policies, the Audit Committee charter provides that the Audit Committee shall pre-approve all audit engagement fees and terms and pre-approve any other significant compensation to be paid to the independent registered public accounting firm. No other significant compensation services were performed for us by Hartley Moore Accountancy Corporation or Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell. P.C. during 20112013 and 2010.
Our financial statements and related notes thereto are listed and included in this Annual Report beginning on page F-1. The following documents are furnished as exhibits to this Form 10-K. Exhibits marked with an asterisk are filed herewith. The remainder of the exhibits previously have been filed with the Commission and are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | | Exhibit |
| 3.1 | | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| 3.2 | | Amended Bylaws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| 4.1 | | Certificate of Designations of Preferences and Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Medical Discoveries, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-121635 filed on Form SB-2 on December 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| 4.4 | | Amendment to Certificate of Designations of Preferences and Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Medical Discoveries, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registration Statement No. 333-121635 filed on Form SB-2 on December 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| 4.5 | | Certificate Of Designation of Preferences and Rights Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Medical Discoveries, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 13, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference) |
| 10.1 | | 2002 Stock Incentive Plan adopted by the Board of Directors as of July 11, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| 10.2 | | Sale and Purchase Agreement between Attorney Hinnerk-Joachim Müller as liquidator of Savetherapeutics AG i.L. and Medical Discoveries, Inc. regarding the purchase of the essential assets of Savetherapeutics AG i.L. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.3 | | Share Exchange Agreement dated September 7, 2007 among Medical Discoveries, Inc., Richard Palmer, and Mobius Risk Group, LLC (filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 17, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.4 | | Definitive Master Agreement dated as of July 29, 2006, by and between MDI Oncology, Inc. and Eucodis Forschungs und Entwicklungs GmbH (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 3, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.5 | | Loan and Security Agreement, dated September 7, 2007, between Medical Discoveries, Inc. and Mercator Momentum Fund III, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 17, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.6 | | Note Amendment And Maturity Date Extension, dated January 12, 2009, between the Company and Mercator Momentum Fund III, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.7 | | Consulting Agreement dated September 7, 2007 between Medical Discoveries, Inc. and Mobius Risk Group, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 17, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.8 | | Employment Agreement dated September 7, 2007 between Medical Discoveries, Inc. and Richard Palmer (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 17, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.9 | | Release and Settlement Agreement dated August 31, 2007 between Medical Discoveries, Inc. and Richard Palmer (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 17, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.10 | | Release and Settlement Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2007, by and among the Company, on the one hand, and Mercator Momentum Fund, LP, Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd., and Mercator Momentum Fund III, LP, on the other hand. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 26, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.11 | | Form of Warrant (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 26, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.12 | | Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2007, by and among Medical Discoveries, Inc. and the Purchasers (as defined therein) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 13, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.13 | | Employment Agreement dated March 20, 2008 between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and Bruce K. Nelson (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 7, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.14 | | Exchange Agreement, effective April 18, 2008, by and between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., on the one hand, and Mercator Momentum Fund, L.P., Mercator Momentum Fund III, L.P., and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 24, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.15 | | Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated May 19, 2008, between Medical Discoveries, Inc. and Mercator Momentum Fund III, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.1610.3 | | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 30, 2008, between the Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and the four shareholdersstockholders of Technology Alternatives Limited, a Belizean Company formed under the Laws of Belize (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed November 14, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.1710.4 | | Limited Liability Company Agreement of GCE Mexico I, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, dated April 23, 2008 (filed on December 31, 2009, as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference)* |
10.18 | | Service Agreement, dated October 15, 2007, between the Company and Corporativo LODEMO S.A DE CV, a Mexican corporation (filed on December 31, 2009 as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference)* |
10.1910.5 | | Sale and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated November 16, 2009, between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., MDI Oncology, Inc., and Curadis Gmbh (filed as an Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 20, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference)* |
| 10.6 | | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 16, 2010, between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and Richard Palmer (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.2110.7 | | Stock Option Agreement, dated March 16, 2010, between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and Richard Palmer (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.22 | | Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 16, 2010, between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and certain investors named therein (including certain exhibits thereto) (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference) |
10.2310.8 | | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 30, 2010, between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and certain investors named therein (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference)* |
10.24 | | Office Lease, dated as of May 24, 2010, between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and Danari Broadway, LLC* |
10.25 | | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 2009, among Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., and Technology Alternatives Limited and its shareholdersstockholders listed therein (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 20, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference) |
| 10.9 | | Office Lease, dated as of February 2, 2014, between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and Skypark Atrium, LLC* |
10.10 | | Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 12, 2013, between Targeted Growth, Inc. and Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.* |
| 10.11 | | Secured Promissory Note, dated March 13, 2013, issued by Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. to Targeted Growth, Inc.* |
| 10.12 | | Security Agreement, dated March 13, 2013 between Targeted Growth, Inc. and Global Clean Energy Holdings Inc.* |
| 10.13 | | LLC Interest Purchase Agreement, dated March 12, 2013, between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., Targeted Growth, Inc. and Green Earth Fuels, LLC |
| 10.14 | | Collateral Transfer and Note Amendment, between Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and Targeted Growth, Inc., as of September 30, 2014 |
| 14.1 | | Medical Discoveries, Inc. Code of Conduct (filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference) |
| 23 | | Consent of Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell. P.C.Hartley Moore Accountancy Corporation * |
3131.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification as adoptedof the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 2002.* |
| 31.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
3232.1
32.2 101.INS 101.SCH 101.CAL 101.DEF 101.LAB 101.PRE | | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedof the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*2002.* Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* XBRL Instance Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation |
| * Filed herewith. |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. |
March 19, 2012November, 2014 | By: /s/ RICHARD PALMER Richard Palmer President and Chief Executive Officer |
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature | | Title | Date |
| | | | |
/s/ RICHARD PALMER | | Chief Executive Officer | March 19, 2012 |
| Richard Palmer | | (Principal Executive Officer) and Director | |
| | | | |
/s/ GREGORY S. CARDENASDONNA REILLY | | Executive Vice-President andInterim Chief Financial Officer (Principal | |
| Donna Reilly | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | March 19, 2012 |
Gregory S. Cardenas | | | |
| | | |
| /s/ DAVID WALKER | | Chairman, the Board of Directors | March 19, 2012 |
| David Walker | | | |
| | | |
| /s/ MARTIN WENZEL | | Director | March 19, 2012 |
| Martin Wenzel | | | |
| | | |
Index to Financial Statements
| Index to Financial Statements |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.
Los Angeles,Torrance, CA
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010,2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity (deficit), and cash flows for the yearsyear then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.audit.
We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our auditsaudit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010,2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the yearsyear then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred significant losses from current operations, used a substantial amount of cash to maintain its operations and has a large working capital deficit. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 20, 201227, 2013
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the entity’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred net losses and used cash in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and has an accumulated deficit of approximately $28,300,000 and negative working capital at December 31, 2013. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Hartley Moore Accountancy Corporation
Hartley Moore Accountancy Corporation
Anaheim, California
November 7, 2014
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | | CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, | | | December 31, | | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ASSETS | ASSETS | | ASSETS | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 676,780 | | | $ | 1,096,618 | | | $ | 216,531 | | | $ | 941,579 | |
| Accounts receivable | | | 2,279 | | | | 6,428 | | | | 38,559 | | | | 2,100 | |
| Inventory | | | 104,782 | | | | 11,706 | | | | 37,296 | | | | 1,564 | |
| Other current assets | | | 327,701 | | | | 248,711 | | | | 157,469 | | | | 298,586 | |
| Total Current Assets | | | 1,111,542 | | | | 1,363,463 | | | | 449,855 | | | | 1,243,829 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET | | | 11,905,182 | | | | 8,103,537 | | | | 15,495,781 | | | | 14,559,002 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| INVESTMENT HELD FOR SALE | | | 291,031 | | | | 292,350 | | | | - | | | | 288,536 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| DEFERRED GROWING COST | | | 2,780,871 | | | | 1,244,419 | | | | - | | | | 3,378,990 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET | | | | 3,972,950 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS | | | 10,814 | | | | 11,243 | | | | 7,021 | | | | 11,372 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 16,099,440 | | | $ | 11,015,012 | | | $ | 19,925,607 | | | $ | 19,481,729 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 1,363,217 | | | $ | 1,837,788 | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | $ | 3,807,646 | | | $ | 1,135,594 | |
| Accrued payroll and payroll taxes | | | 1,046,763 | | | | 1,686,465 | | | | 1,170,223 | | | | 1,018,894 | |
| Deferred revenue | | | 152,732 | | | | - | | |
| Capital lease liability - current portion | | | 56,257 | | | | 47,139 | | | | 818 | | | | 42,829 | |
| Notes payable to shareholders | | | 26,000 | | | | 26,000 | | |
| Notes payable - current portion | | | | 1,376,000 | | | | 60,800 | |
| Convertible notes payable | | | 193,200 | | | | 193,200 | | | | 567,000 | | | | 567,000 | |
| Total Current Liabilities | | | 2,838,169 | | | | 3,790,592 | | | | 6,921,687 | | | | 2,825,117 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued interest payable | | | 1,684,186 | | | | 1,154,943 | | | | 3,154,826 | | | | 2,121,787 | |
| Accrued return on noncontrolling interest | | | 2,907,678 | | | | 1,452,744 | | | | 7,442,730 | | | | 4,963,582 | |
| Capital lease liability - long term portion | | | 31,258 | | | | 98,372 | | |
| Convertible notes payable | | | 567,000 | | | | 567,000 | | |
| Notes payable - long term portion | | | | - | | | | 40,200 | |
| Mortgage notes payable | | | 5,110,189 | | | | 2,793,934 | | | | 5,110,189 | | | | 5,110,189 | |
| Total Long Term Liabilities | | | 10,300,311 | | | | 6,066,993 | | | | 15,707,745 | | | | 12,235,758 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | | | | | | | | |
| STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock - $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series B, convertible; 13,000 shares issued (aggregate liquidation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| preference of $1,300,000) | | | 13 | | | | 13 | | | | 13 | | | | 13 | |
| Common stock, $0.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 285,062,812 and 270,464,478 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | | | 285,062 | | | | 270,464 | | |
| 339,187,545 and 293,683,502 issued and outstanding | | | | 339,187 | | | | 293,683 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | | 24,260,628 | | | | 23,580,630 | | | | 25,600,050 | | | | 24,588,022 | |
| Accumulated deficit | | | (26,662,294 | ) | | | (26,933,430 | ) | | | (28,338,875 | ) | | | (26,599,007 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (21,996 | ) | | | (2,195 | ) | | | (63,020 | ) | | | (56,121 | ) |
| Total Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. Stockholders' Deficit | | | (2,138,587 | ) | | | (3,084,518 | ) | | | (2,462,645 | ) | | | (1,773,410 | ) |
| Noncontrolling interests | | | 5,099,547 | | | | 4,241,945 | | | | (241,180 | ) | | | 6,194,264 | |
| Total equity (deficit) | | | 2,960,960 | | | | 1,157,427 | | |
| Total Stockholders' equity (deficit) | | | | (2,703,825 | ) | | | 4,420,854 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | $ | 16,099,440 | | | $ | 11,015,012 | | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | $ | 19,925,607 | | �� | $ | 19,481,729 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements |
| |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | For the Years Ended | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Revenue | | $ | 281,248 | | | $ | 367,811 | |
| Subsidy Income | | | 51,072 | | | | 768,272 | |
| Total Revenue | | | 332,320 | | | | 1,136,083 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | | | 2,573,719 | | | | 2,069,309 | |
| Loss on sale of investment held for sale | | | 178,896 | | | | - | |
| Write down of impaired long lived assets | | | 3,440,904 | | | | 1,639,815 | |
| Plantation operating costs | | | 786,300 | | | | 826,227 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total Operating Expenses | | | 6,979,819 | | | | 4,535,351 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Loss from Operations | | | (6,647,499 | ) | | | (3,399,268 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other Income (Expenses) | | | | | | | | |
| Other income | | | 90 | | | | 121 | |
| Interest expense | | | (999,524 | ) | | | (857,439 | ) |
| Gain on settlement of liabilities | | | 50,138 | | | | 1,013,387 | |
| Foreign currency transaction gain (loss) | | | (1,612 | ) | | | (32,716 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Other Income (Expenses) | | | (950,908 | ) | | | 123,353 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Loss | | | (7,598,407 | ) | | | (3,275,915 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Less Net Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest | | | (5,676,647 | ) | | | (3,339,202 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. | | $ | (1,921,760 | ) | | $ | 63,287 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Amounts attributable to Global Clean Energy | | | | | | | | |
| Holdings, Inc. common shareholders: | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income (Loss) | | $ | (1,921,760 | ) | | $ | 63,287 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic Income (Loss) per Common Share: | | | | | | | | |
| Net Basic Income (Loss) per Common Share | | $ | (0.0059 | ) | | $ | 0.0002 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding | | | 327,107,796 | | | | 292,244,373 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted Income (Loss) per Common Share: | | | | | | | | |
| Net Diluted Income (Loss) per Common Share | | $ | (0.0059 | ) | | $ | 0.0002 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding | | | 327,107,796 | | | | 318,962,355 | |
| | |
| The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | |
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | For the Year Ended | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Revenue | | $ | 339,105 | | | $ | 456,595 | |
| Subsidy Income | | | 938,280 | | | | 392,213 | |
| Total Revenue | | | 1,277,385 | | | | 848,808 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | | | 2,087,447 | | | | 2,659,588 | |
| Plantation operating costs | | | 454,947 | | | | 389,738 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total Operating Expenses | | | 2,542,394 | | | | 3,049,326 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Loss from Operations | | | (1,265,009 | ) | | | (2,200,518 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other Income (Expenses) | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | | | 185 | | | | 85 | |
| Interest expense | | | (608,068 | ) | | | (489,039 | ) |
| Gain on settlement of liabilities | | | 1,024,076 | | | | 601,114 | |
| Foreign currency transaction gain | | | 70,272 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Other Income | | | 486,465 | | | | 112,160 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Loss from Continuing Operations | | | (778,544 | ) | | | (2,088,358 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations | | | (574 | ) | | | 31,266 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Loss | | | (779,118 | ) | | | (2,057,092 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Less Net Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest | | | 1,050,254 | | | | 1,431,805 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income (Loss) attributable to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. | | | 271,136 | | | | (625,287 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other Comprehensive Income (loss) - foreign currency | | | | | | | | |
| translation adjustment | | | (19,801 | ) | | | 3,913 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Comprehensive Income (Loss) attributable to | | | | | | | | |
| Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. | | $ | 251,335 | | | $ | (621,374 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Amounts attributable to Global Clean Energy | | | | | | | | |
| Holdings, Inc. common shareholders: | | | | | | | | |
| Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | | $ | 271,710 | | | $ | (656,553 | ) |
| Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations | | | (574 | ) | | | 31,266 | |
| Net Income (Loss) | | $ | 271,136 | | | $ | (625,287 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic and Diluted Loss per Common Share: | | | | | | | | |
| Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | | $ | 0.0010 | | | $ | (0.0025 | ) |
| Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations | | | (0.0000 | ) | | | 0.0001 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income(Loss) per Common Share | | $ | 0.0010 | | | $ | (0.0024 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic and Diluted Weighted-Average Common | | | | | | | | |
| Shares Outstanding | | | 277,120,926 | | | | 261,721,283 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | |
| |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | For the Years Ended | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Net Loss | | $ | (7,598,407 | ) | | $ | (3,275,915 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss)- foreign currency | | | | | | | | |
| translation adjustment | | | 114,765 | | | | 835,263 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Comprehensive Loss | | | (7,483,642 | ) | | | (2,440,652 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Add net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest | | | 5,676,647 | | | | 3,339,202 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Add other comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | (121,664 | ) | | | (869,388 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Comprehensive Loss Attributable to | | | | | | | | |
| Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. | | $ | (1,928,659 | ) | | $ | 29,162 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements |
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT) | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Additional | | | | | | Other | | | Non- | | | | |
| | | Series B | | | Common stock | | | Paid in | | | Accumulated | | | Comprehensive | | | controlling | | | | |
| | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Deficit | | | Loss | | | Interests | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2009 | | | 13,000 | | | $ | 13 | | | | 236,919,079 | | | $ | 236,919 | | | $ | 22,998,907 | | | $ | (26,308,143 | ) | | $ | (6,108 | ) | | $ | 2,485,792 | | | $ | (592,621 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,713,530 | | | | 3,713,530 | |
| Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.02 per share | | | - | | | | - | | | | 25,000,000 | | | | 25,000 | | | | 475,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 500,000 | |
Share-based compensation from issuance of options and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 115,268 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 115,268 | |
| Cashless Exercise of Warrants | | | - | | | | - | | | | 8,545,399 | | | | 8,545 | | | | (8,545 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Accrual of preferential return for the noncontrolling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (841,875 | ) | | | (841,875 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation gain | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,913 | | | | 316,303 | | | | 320,216 | |
Net income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2010 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (625,287 | ) | | | - | | | | (1,431,805 | ) | | | (2,057,092 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2010 | | | 13,000 | | | | 13 | | | | 270,464,478 | | | | 270,464 | | | | 23,580,630 | | | | (26,933,430 | ) | | | (2,195 | ) | | | 4,241,945 | | | | 1,157,427 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5,031,410 | | | | 5,031,410 | |
| Issuance of common stock for cash | | | - | | | | - | | | | 12,083,334 | | | | 12,083 | | | | 487,917 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 500,000 | |
| Exercise of Warrants | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,890,000 | | | | 1,890 | | | | 54,810 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 56,700 | |
| Issuance of common stock for services | | | - | | | | - | | | | 625,000 | | | | 625 | | | | 12,500 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 13,125 | |
Share-based compensation from issuance of options and compensation-based warrants | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 124,771 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 124,771 | |
Accrual of preferential return for the noncontrolling interests | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,454,934 | ) | | | (1,454,934 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation loss | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (19,801 | ) | | | (1,668,620 | ) | | | (1,688,421 | ) |
| Net income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2011 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 271,136 | | | | - | | | | (1,050,254 | ) | | | (779,118 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | 13,000 | | | $ | 13 | | | | 285,062,812 | | | $ | 285,062 | | | $ | 24,260,628 | | | $ | (26,662,294 | ) | | $ | (21,996 | ) | | $ | 5,099,547 | | | $ | 2,960,960 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements |
| |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT) | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Additional | | | | | | Other | | | Non- | | | | |
| | | Series B | | | Common stock | | | Paid in | | | Accumulated | | | Comprehensive | | | controlling | | | | |
| | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Deficit | | | Loss | | | Interests | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | 13,000 | | | $ | 13 | | | | 285,062,812 | | | $ | 285,062 | | | $ | 24,260,628 | | | $ | (26,662,294 | ) | | $ | (21,996 | ) | | $ | 5,099,547 | | | $ | 2,960,960 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 5,620,435 | | | | 5,620,435 | |
| Issuance of common stock for cash | | | - | | | | - | | | | 8,620,690 | | | | 8,621 | | | | 241,379 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 250,000 | |
| Exercise of warrants | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Exercise of options | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of common stock for services | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Share-based compensation from issuance of options and compensation-based warrants | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 86,015 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 86,015 | |
Accrual of preferential return for the noncontrolling interests | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (2,055,904 | ) | | | (2,055,904 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation gain (loss) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (34,125 | ) | | | 869,388 | | | | 835,263 | |
| Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 63,287 | | | | - | | | | (3,339,202 | ) | | | (3,275,915 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance for the year ended December 31, 2012 | | | 13,000 | | | $ | 13 | | | $ | 293,683,502 | | | $ | 293,683 | | | $ | 24,588,022 | | | $ | (26,599,007 | ) | | $ | (56,121 | ) | | $ | 6,194,264 | | | $ | 4,420,854 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | | | 13,000 | | | $ | 13 | | | | 293,683,502 | | | $ | 293,683 | | | $ | 24,588,022 | | | $ | (26,599,007 | ) | | $ | (56,121 | ) | | $ | 6,194,264 | | | $ | 4,420,854 | |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,598,687 | | | | 1,598,687 | |
| Issuance of common stock | | | - | | | | - | | | | 40,000,000 | | | | 40,000 | | | | 760,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 800,000 | |
| Exercise of options | | | | | | | | | | | 1,477,089 | | | | 1,477 | | | | 13,294 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 14,771 | |
| Exercise of warrants | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,026,954 | | | | 4,027 | | | | 36,243 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 40,270 | |
| Issuance of common stock for services | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Share-based compensation from issuance of options and compensation-based warrants | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 202,491 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 202,491 | |
Accrual of preferential return for the noncontrolling interests | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (2,479,148 | ) | | | (2,479,148 | ) |
| Dissolution of TAL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 181,891 | | | | | | | | | | | | 181,891 | |
| Foreign currency translation loss | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (6,899 | ) | | | 121,664 | | | | 114,765 | |
| Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,921,760 | ) | | | - | | | | (5,676,647 | ) | | | (7,598,407 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance for the year ended December 31, 2013 | | | 13,000 | | | $ | 13 | | | | 339,187,545 | | | $ | 339,187 | | | $ | 25,600,050 | | | $ | (28,338,876 | ) | | $ | (63,020 | ) | | $ | (241,180 | ) | | $ | (2,703,825 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | | |
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |
| | | For the Year Ended | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | $ | (779,118 | ) | | $ | (2,057,092 | ) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency transaction gain | | | (70,272 | ) | | | - | |
| Gain on settlement of liabilities | | | (1,024,076 | ) | | | (601,114 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | | | 137,271 | | | | 115,268 | |
| Depreciation | | | 273,321 | | | | 243,695 | |
| Loss on sale of assets | | | - | | | | 1,234 | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | | | 6,401 | | | | 145,130 | |
| Inventory | | | (106,293 | ) | | | (11,470 | ) |
| Other current assets | | | (114,703 | ) | | | (123,133 | ) |
| Deferred growing costs | | | (1,891,166 | ) | | | (1,219,337 | ) |
| Other noncurrent assets | | | (13,428 | ) | | | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 495,883 | | | | 854,278 | |
| Deferred revenue | | | 152,732 | | | | - | |
| Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | | | (2,933,448 | ) | | | (2,652,541 | ) |
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities | | | | | | | | |
| Purchase of land | | | (2,322,188 | ) | | | (722,588 | ) |
| Plantation development costs | | | (2,750,606 | ) | | | (1,159,959 | ) |
| Purchase of property and equipment | | | (242,239 | ) | | | (256,534 | ) |
| Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | | | (5,315,033 | ) | | | (2,139,081 | ) |
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock for cash | | | 500,000 | | | | 500,000 | |
| Proceeds from exercise of warrants | | | 56,700 | | | | - | |
| Proceeds from issuance of preferred membership in GCE Mexico I, LLC | | | 5,031,410 | | | | 3,713,530 | |
| Proceeds from notes payable | | | 2,316,255 | | | | 742,652 | |
| Payments on capital leases and notes payable | | | (46,381 | ) | | | (485,567 | ) |
| Proceeds from convertible notes payable | | | - | | | | 567,000 | |
| Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | | | 7,857,984 | | | | 5,037,615 | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | (29,341 | ) | | | 17,041 | |
| Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | (419,838 | ) | | | 263,034 | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | | | 1,096,618 | | | | 833,584 | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | | $ | 676,780 | | | $ | 1,096,618 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest | | $ | 77,176 | | | $ | 168,928 | |
| Noncash Investing and Financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Cashless exercise of warrants | | | - | | | | 8,545 | |
| Accrual of return on noncontrolling interest | | | 1,454,934 | | | | 841,875 | |
| Plantation costs financed by accounts payable | | | - | | | | 32,497 | |
| Reclass of Technology Alternative, Ltd. to investments held for sale | | | - | | | | 292,525 | |
| Equipment purchase for debt | | | - | | | | 149,419 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | | | | | |
|
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| | | | | | | |
| | | For the years ended | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Operating Activities | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | $ | (7,598,406 | ) | | $ | (3,275,915 | ) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency transaction gain | | | 1,612 | | | | 32,716 | |
| Gain on settlement of liabilities | | | (50,138 | ) | | | (1,013,387 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | | | 202,491 | | | | 86,015 | |
| Write down of deferred growing cost | | | 3,440,904 | | | | 1,183,991 | |
| Write down of long lived assets | | | 33,715 | | | | 455,824 | |
| Write down of inventory | | | - | | | | 130,038 | |
| Loss on sale of investment held for sale | | | 178,896 | | | | - | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | 475,919 | | | | 267,807 | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | | | (35,970 | ) | | | - | |
| Inventory | | | 87,792 | | | | (22,124 | ) |
| Other current assets | | | 123,041 | | | | 73,646 | |
| Deferred growing costs | | | - | | | | (1,564,751 | ) |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 1,522,101 | | | | 1,023,437 | |
| Deferred revenue | | | - | | | | (152,732 | ) |
| Other noncurrent assets | | | (1,302 | ) | | | (41,414 | ) |
| Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | | | (1,619,345 | ) | | | (2,816,849 | ) |
| Investing Activities | | | | | | | | |
| Plantation development costs | | | (881,221 | ) | | | (2,449,858 | ) |
| Purchase of property and equipment | | | (3,112 | ) | | | (259,978 | ) |
| Disposal of property and equipment | | | - | | | | - | |
| Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | | 171,254 | | | | - | |
| Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | | | (713,079 | ) | | | (2,709,836 | ) |
| Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | - | | | | 250,000 | |
| Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants | | | 55,041 | | | | - | |
| Proceeds from issuance of preferred membership in GCE Mexico I, LLC | | | 1,598,688 | | | | 5,620,435 | |
| Payments on capital leases and notes payable | | | (47,776 | ) | | | (49,839 | ) |
| Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | | | 1,605,953 | | | | 5,820,596 | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 1,424 | | | | (29,112 | ) |
| Net change in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | (725,048 | ) | | | 264,799 | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period | | | 941,579 | | | | 676,780 | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period | | $ | 216,531 | | | $ | 941,579 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest | | $ | 9,603 | | | $ | 75,967 | |
| Noncash Investing and Financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Accrual of return on noncontrolling interest | | $ | 2,479,148 | | | $ | 2,055,904 | |
| Acquisitions: | | | | | | | | |
| Intangible assets and equipment acquired | | $ | 4,359,341 | | | | - | |
| Inventory acquired | | | 123,599 | | | | - | |
| Other current assets assumed | | | 260 | | | | - | |
| Other current liabilities assumed | | | (2,383,100 | ) | | | - | |
| Net assets acquired | | $ | 2,100,100 | | | $ | - | |
| Notes payable issued | | $ | (1,300,000 | ) | | | - | |
| Common stock issued | | $ | (800,000 | ) | | | - | |
| | | | | | |
| The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | | | | | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – History and Basis of Presentation
History
Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) is a U.S.-based, multi-national, energy agri-business focused on the development of non-food based bio-feedstocks.
The companyCompany was originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Utah on November 20, 1991. Effective as of August 6, 1992, the Company merged with and into WPI Pharmaceutical, Inc., a Utah corporation, pursuant to which WPI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. was the surviving corporation. Pursuant to the merger, the name of the surviving corporation was changed to Medical Discoveries, Inc. (“MDI”). MDI’s initial business purpose was the research and development of an anti-infection drug. In 2005, MDI acquired the assets and business associated with the SaveCream technology and carried on the research and development of this drug candidate. MDI made the decision in 2007 to discontinue further development of its drug candidates and sell the technologies.
On September 7, 2007, MDI entered into a share exchange agreement pursuant to which it acquired all of the outstanding ownership interests in Global Clean Energy Holdings, LLC, discussed further in Note 3. Global Clean Energy Holdings, LLC was an entity that had certain trade secrets, know-how, business plans, term sheets, business relationships, and other information relating to the start-up of a business related to the cultivation and production of seed oil from the seed of the Jatropha plant. With this transaction, MDI commenced the research and development of a business whose purpose is to provide feedstock oil intended for the production of bio-diesel.
On January 29, 2008, a meeting of shareholders was held and, among other things, the name Medical Discoveries, Inc. was changed to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”).
Effective April 23, 2008, the Company entered into a limited liability company agreement to form GCE Mexico I, LLC (GCE Mexico) along with nine unaffiliated investors. The Company owns 50% of the common membership interest of GCE Mexico and five of the unaffiliated investors own the other 50% of the common membership interest. Additionally, a total of 1,000 preferred membership units were issued to two of the unaffiliated investors. GCE Mexico owns a 99% interest in its Mexican subsidiaries, Asideros Globales Corporativo (Asideros), Asideros 2, and Asideros 3, entities organized under the laws of Mexico, and the Company owns the remaining 1% directly. GCE Mexico was organized primarily to, among other things, acquire land in Mexico through subsidiaries for the cultivation of the Jatropha plant.
On July 2, 2009, the Company acquired 100% of the equity interests of Technology Alternatives, Limited (TAL), which has developed a farm in Belize for cultivation of the Jatropha plant. TAL has also developed a nursery capable of producing Jatropha seedlings and rooted cuttings, and provided technical advisory services for the propagation of the Jatropha plant.
In March 2010, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Global Energias Renovables (GER) which manages the company’s bio-fuels operations in Latin America.
On July 19, 2010, the reincorporation of the company from a Utah corporation to a Delaware corporation was completed, as approved by shareholders. In the reincorporation, each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock was automatically converted into one share of common stock of the surviving Delaware corporation. In addition, the par value of the Company’s capital stock changed from no par per share to $0.001 per share. The effects of the change in par value have been reflected retroactively in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for all periods presented. The effect of retroactively applying the par value of $0.001 per share resulted in reclassification of $17,409,660 of common stock and $1,290,722 of preferred stock as of December 31, 2008 to additional paid-in capital. The reincorporation did not result in any change in the Company’s name, ticker symbol, CUSIP number, business, assets or operations. The management and Board of Directors of the company remained the same.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc., its subsidiaries, and the variable interest entities of GCE Mexico I, LLC a Delaware limited liability company (“GCE Mexico”), and its Mexican subsidiaries (Asideros, Asideros 2 and Asideros 3). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Generally accepted accounting principles require that if an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE), the entity should consolidate the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the VIE in its consolidated financial statements. Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. considers itself to be the primary beneficiary of GCE Mexico, and it’s Mexican subsidiaries, and accordingly, has consolidated these entities since their formation beginning in April 2008, with the equity interests of the unaffiliated investors in GCE Mexico presented as Noncontrolling Interests in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
| GCE MEXICO I, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES | |
| CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | December | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| CURRENT ASSETS | | $ | 791,426 | | | $ | 1,136,478 | |
| PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET | | | 11,391,682 | | | | 7,538,994 | |
| DEFERRED GROWING COST | | | 2,780,871 | | | | 1,244,419 | |
| OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS | | | 7,314 | | | | 7,743 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 14,971,293 | | | $ | 9,927,634 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | | $ | 456,793 | | | $ | 213,456 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | | | 9,360,013 | | | | 5,499,993 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | | $ | 9,816,806 | | | $ | 5,713,449 | |
1. The power to make decisions regarding the activities that most significantly impact the success of the VIE, and
2. The obligation to absorb losses or rights to receive benefits of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
When multiple parties make decisions over different activities of the entity, only the party with power to direct the activities that most significantly impacts the entity's economic performance will have satisfied the first condition. Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. exercises complete operational control over GCE Mexico and its subsidiaries, as these rights were specifically granted to Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. under the GCE Mexico’s Operating Agreement (the “LLC Agreement”).
Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. satisfies the second condition because as owner of a 50% profits interest, Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. is expected to receive the benefits or the largest amounts of profits and cash distributions allocated by GCE Mexico. The partners’ right to receive a preferred return on their investment does not qualify as a “right to receive residual returns” of GCE Mexico.
The guidance also states that “in a multi-tiered legal-entity structure, a reporting entity should generally begin its evaluation at the lowest-level entity. Each entity within the structure should then be evaluated on a consolidated basis. The attributes and variable interests of the underlying consolidated entities become those of the parent company upon consolidation”.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
GCE Mexico holds, directly, 99% of the voting interest in the subsidiaries pursuant to the Agency Agreement. GCEH’s rights as Manager of GCE Mexico and as the sole Director of the subsidiaries enables GCEH to conclude that these powers, together with the 50% membership interest in GCE Mexico, gives Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. a controlling financial interest and therefore is the primary beneficiary.
GCE MEXICO I, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES | |
| CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |
| | |
| | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | | | |
| CURRENT ASSETS | | $ | 363,358 | | | $ | 1,184,194 | |
| PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET | | | 14,720,296 | | | | 14,209,193 | |
| DEFERRED GROWING COST | | | - | | | | 3,378,990 | |
| OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS | | | 3,522 | | | | 7,872 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 15,087,176 | | | $ | 18,780,249 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | | $ | 1,008,651 | | | $ | 437,540 | |
| LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | | | 15,620,765 | | | | 12,186,218 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL LIABILITY | | $ | 16,629,416 | | | $ | 12,623,758 | |
In March 2013, the Company acquired 100% of all of the outstanding membership interests of Sustainable Oils, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements for periods after that acquisition include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of that entity.
Accounting for Agricultural Operations
All costs incurred until the actual planting of the Jatropha Curcas plant are capitalized as plantation development costs, and are included in “Property and Equipment” on the balance sheet. Plantation development costs are being accumulated in the balance sheet during the development period and will beare accounted for in accordance with accounting standards for Agricultural Producers and Agricultural Cooperatives. The direct costs associated with each farm and the production of the Jatropha revenue streams have been deferred and accumulated as a noncurrent asset, “Deferred Growing Costs”, on the balance sheet. These costs will be recognized as a Cost of Good Sold in the period the revenue is recognized. In 2013, the balance of the Deferred Growing Costs were related to our first Jatropha farm in Mexico and were written off. The trees in certain areas were not expected to produce enough yield or generate enough future revenues to offset the capital expended in a reasonable period of time and, accordingly, an impairment charge was recorded. Other general costs without expected future benefits are expensed when incurred.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments maturing inwith original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Inventory
The companyCompany uses the LIFOFIFO valuation method for its inventories. The companyCompany records no inventories above their acquisition costs. As of December 31, 2011, there have beenThere was no losses related to the valuation of inventory. Inventory atinventory during the year ended December 31, 20112013 and 2010 consists mainly of seeds held for sale, seedlings and bags held as work$130,038 in process.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementslosses in 2012.
Concentration of Credit Risk
At December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, the Company had no cash and cash equivalents in the United States or Mexico in excess of federally-insured limits of $5,000 and $328,000, respectively, bank deposits in the United States, and nolimits. The Company had $362,825 excess balances for bank deposits in Mexico.Mexico at December 31, 2012. The Company has maintained its cash balances at what management considers to be high credit-quality financial institutions.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Property and Equipment
Substantially all property and equipment relate to plantation costs and related equipment to cultivate the Jatropha Curcas plant. Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of office equipment is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 3 to 5 years. Plantation equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 5 to 15 years. Depreciation of plantation equipment has been capitalized as part of plantation development costs through the date that the plantation becomes commercially productive. Plantation development costs have been accumulated in the balance sheet during the development period and are being accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for agricultural producers and agricultural cooperatives. The initial plantations were deemed to be commercially productive on October 1, 2009, at which date the Company commenced the depreciation of plantation development costs over estimated useful lives of 10 to 35 years, depending on the nature of the development. Developments and other improvements with indefinite lives are capitalized and not depreciated. Other developments that have a limited life and intermediate-life plants that have growth and production cycles of more than one year are depreciated over their respective lives once they are placed in service. Land,During 2013, the Company had land, plantation development costs, and plantation equipment are located in Mexico.Mexico, Belize and the Dominican Republic
Except for costs incurred during the development period of the plantation, normal maintenance and repair items are charged to costs and expensed as incurred. During the development period, maintenance, repairs, and depreciation of plantation equipment have been capitalized as part of the plantation development costs. The cost and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment sold or otherwise retired are removed from the accounts and gain or loss on disposition is reflected in results of operations.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for the impairment or disposalImpairment of long-lived assets, the carrying values of intangible assets and other long-livedLong-Lived Assets - Long-lived assets are reviewed on a regular basis for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the existencecarrying amount of facts or circumstances thatan asset may suggest impairment. The Company recognizes impairment when the sumnot be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparison of the expected undiscountedcarrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is less thanmeasured by the amount that the carrying amount of the asset. Impairment losses, if any, are measured asassets exceeds the excessfair value of the carrying amountassets. At December 31, 2013, the Company reviewed its long-lived assets and determined a portion of the asset over its estimated fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2011Deferred Growing Cost and 2010, management’s review of the carrying values of long-lived assets did not indicate any impairment.Plantation Development Costs related to Asideros 1 were impaired. See Note 10 for details.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and the carryforward of operating losses and tax credits, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance against deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that such tax benefits will not be realized. Assets and liabilities are established for uncertain tax positions taken or positions expected to be taken in income tax returns when such positions are judged to not meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold based on the technical merits of the positions. Estimated interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of general and administrative expense.
Income/Loss per Common Share
Income/Loss per share amounts are computed by dividing income or loss applicable to the common shareholders of the Company by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted income or loss per share amounts are computed assuming the issuance of common stock for potentially dilutive common stock equivalents. The number of dilutive warrants and options is computed using the treasury stock method, whereby the dilutive effect is reduced by the number of treasury shares the Company could purchase with the proceeds from exercises of warrants and options.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Income taxes are provided for temporary differences between financial and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The following is a reconciliation of the amount of benefit that would result from applying the federal statutory rate to pretax loss with the benefit from income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
| Rate Reconciliation | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| Federal income tax (benefit) at statutory rate (34%) | | $ | (265,000 | ) | | $ | (699,000 | ) |
| State income tax (benefit) , net of federal benefit | | | 17,000 | | | | (31,000 | ) |
| Foreign income tax benefit | | | 8,000 | | | | 37,000 | |
| Gain on sale of SaveCream assets | | | - | | | | - | |
| Losses allocated to preferred members of GCE Mexico | | | 356,000 | | | | 488,000 | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | - | | | | (13,000 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | | | 77,000 | | | | 64,000 | |
| Expiration of operating loss and research credit carryforwards | | | (147,000 | ) | | | 403,000 | |
| Adjustment of operating loss carryforwards | | | - | | | | (6,000 | ) |
| Other differences | | | 3,000 | | | | 1,000 | |
| Change in valuation allowance | | | (49,000 | ) | | | (244,000 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows at December 31, 2011 and 2010, using a combined deferred income tax rate of 40%:
| Components of Net Deferred Taxes | | | | | | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| Net operating loss carryforward | | $ | 7,263,000 | | | $ | 7,121,000 | |
| Share-based compensation | | | 725,000 | | | | 746,000 | |
| Accrued compensation and other liabilities | | | 661,000 | | | | 831,000 | |
| Other | | | (2,000 | ) | | | (2,000 | ) |
| Valuation allowance | | | (8,647,000 | ) | | | (8,696,000 | ) |
| Net deferred tax asset | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
In as much as it is not possible to determine when or if the net operating losses will be utilized, a valuation allowance has been established to offset the benefit of the utilization of the net operating losses.
As of December 31, 2011 the Company has available net operating losses of approximately $17,802,000 which can be utilized to offset future earnings of the Company. The utilization of the net operating losses are dependent upon the tax laws in effect at the time such losses can be utilized. The loss carryforwards expire between the years 2012 and 2031. Should the Company experience a significant change of ownership, the utilization of net operating losses could be reduced.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
| | | For the years ended December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Net Income (loss) | | $ | (1,921,760 | ) | | $ | 63,287 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding | | | 327,107,796 | | | | 292,244,373 | |
| Effect of dilutive securities | | | | | | | | |
| Convertible preferred stock - Series B | | | - | | | | 11,818,181 | |
| Warrants | | | - | | | | 9,306,783 | |
| Options | | | - | | | | 5,593,018 | |
| Diluted Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding | | | 327,107,796 | | | | 318,962,355 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic Income (loss) Per Common Share | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income (loss) | | | (0.0059 | ) | | | 0.0002 | |
| Diluted Income (loss) Per Common Share | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income (loss) | | | (0.0059 | ) | | | 0.0002 | |
The Companyfollowing instruments are currently antidilutive and its subsidiaries file tax returns inhave been excluded from the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and, in the statecalculations of California. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for tax years before and includingdiluted income or loss per share at December 31, 2007. The Company is no longer subject to examination by state tax authorities for tax years before and including December 31, 2006. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not recognize interest and penalties.2013, as follows:
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Convertible notes | | | 18,900,000 | | | | 18,900,000 | |
| Convertible preferred stock - Series B | | | 11,818,181 | | | | - | |
| Warrants | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 1,708,184 | |
| Compensation-based stock options | | | 69,375,311 | | | | 54,860,000 | |
| | | | 102,093,492 | | | | 75,468,184 | |
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; collectability is reasonably assured; and title and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the buyer. Value added taxes collected on revenue transactions are excluded from revenue and are included in accounts payable until remittance to the taxation authority.
Jatropha oiland Camelina biofuel revenue - The Company’s long-term primary source of revenue willcurrently is expected to be crudebe the sale of seeds from elite lines of Jatropha oil.and/or Camelina used for propagation and the sale of Jatropha oil and biomass in the form of charcoal and/or animal feed. Revenue will be recognized net of sales or value added taxes and upon transfer of significant risks and rewards of ownership to the buyer. Revenue is not recognized when there are significant uncertainties regarding recovery of the consideration due, associated costs or the possible return of goods. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company had no significant Jatropha or Camelina biofuel revenue.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Advisory services revenue - The Company provides development and management services to other companies regarding their bio-fuels and/or feedstock-Jatropha development operations, on a fee for services basis. The advisory services revenue is recognized upon completion of the work in accordance with the separateeach advisory contract.
Agricultural subsidies revenue - the Company receives agricultural subsidies from the Mexican government.government to supplement the farm development and planting of new trees. Due to the uncertainty of these payments, the revenue is recognized when the payments are received. We recognize these funds as revenue due to these payments being disbursed to supplement the Company’s income and not as direct payments for any specified farming expense.
Research and Development
Prior to the discontinuation of its bio-pharmaceutical business, research and development had been the principal function of the Company. Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred.
Foreign Currency
During 2011, the Company had operations located in the United States, Mexico and Belize. For these foreign operations, the functional currency is the local country’s currency. Consequently, revenues and expenses of operations outside the United States of America are translated into U.S. dollars using weighted average exchange rates, while assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States of America are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates at the balance sheet date. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in equity (deficit) as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Foreign currency transaction adjustments are included in other income (expense) in the Company’s results of operations.
Certain foreign currency transactions related to the discontinued bio-pharmaceutical business are primarily undertaken in Euros. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income or loss. Consequently, certain foreign currency gains and losses have been included in income from discontinued operations.
The Company has not entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for accounts receivable and payable approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported for the various notes payable and the mortgage note payable approximate fair value because the underlying instruments are at interest rates which approximate current market rates. See note 11 for additional information regarding assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and reported revenues and expenses. Significant estimates used in preparing these financial statements include a) those assumed in determining the valuation of common stock, warrants, and stock options, b) estimated useful lives of plantation equipment and plantation development costs, and c) undiscounted future cash flows for purpose of evaluating possible impairment of long-term assets. It is at least reasonably possible that the significant estimates used will change within the next year.
Profit/Loss per Common Share
Profit/Loss per share amounts are computed by dividing profit or loss applicable to the common shareholders of the Company by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted profit or loss per share amounts are computed assuming the issuance of common stock for potentially dilutive common stock equivalents.
All outstanding stock options, warrants, convertible notes, and convertible preferred stock are currently antidilutive and have been excluded from the calculations of diluted profit or loss per share at December 31, 2011 and 2010, as follows:
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Convertible notes | | | 19,028,671 | | | | 19,028,671 | |
| Convertible preferred stock - Series B | | | 11,818,181 | | | | 11,818,181 | |
| Warrants | | | 24,585,662 | | | | 26,475,662 | |
| Compensation-based stock options and warrants | | | 74,731,483 | | | | 69,531,483 | |
| | | | 130,163,997 | | | | 126,853,997 | |
Stock Based CompensationForeign Currency
During 2013, the Company had operations located in the United States, Mexico, Dominican Republic and Belize. For these foreign operations, the functional currency is the local country’s currency. Consequently, revenues and expenses of operations outside the United States of America are translated into U.S. dollars using weighted average exchange rates, while assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States of America are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates at the balance sheet date. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in equity (deficit) as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Foreign currency transaction adjustments are included in other income (expense) in the Company’s results of operations.
The Company has not entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock-based awards expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award based on their grant date fair value. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes option pricing model which requires management to make estimates for certain assumptions regarding risk-free interest rate, expected life of options, expected volatility of stock and expected dividend yield of stock.
Subsequent Events
stock. The Company has evaluatedrecorded stock based compensation expense related to equity instruments granted as general and administrative expenses in the accompanying financialconsolidated statements for subsequent events through the date of filing this report.operations.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Prior Period Reclassifications
Certain December 31, 2010 balances have been reclassified in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to conform to the December 31, 2011 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the December 31, 2010 total equity or net loss.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidelines/StatementsComprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance requiring entities to report components of other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive statements of net income and other comprehensive income. Retrospective application will be required beginning in 2012.
The Company expects to be required to include in its financial statements thecompany has included a consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
New Account Guidelines
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company beginning in theits first quarter of 2012.2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new revenue standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011,August 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding fair value measurements. This guidance establishes common requirements for measuring fair valuethat requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern. If such conditions or events exist, disclosures are required that enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature of the conditions or evens, management's evaluation of the circumstances and for disclosing informationmanagement's plans to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). It also clarifies the FASB’s intententity's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will be required to perform an annual assessment of its ability to continue as a going concern when this standard becomes effective on January 1, 2017; however, the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidatedour financial statements.
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued authoritative guidance related to balance sheet offsetting. The new guidance requires disclosures about assets and liabilities that are offset or have the potential to be offset. These disclosures are intended to address differences in the asset and liability offsetting requirements under U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This new guidance will be effective for us for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2013, with retrospective application required. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’sposition, results of operations or financial position. cash flows.
Note 2 – Going Concern Considerations
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations applicable to its common shareholders of $778,544$7,598,406 and $2,088,358$3,275,915 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20112013, and 2010,2012, respectively, and has an accumulated deficit applicable to its common shareholders of $26,662,294$28,338,875 at December 31, 2011.2013. The Company also used cash in operating activities of $2,933,448$1,619,345 and $2,652,541$2,816,849 during the years ended December 31, 20112013 and 2010,2012, respectively. At December 31, 2011,2013, the Company has negative working capital of $1,726,627$6,471,832 and a stockholders’ deficit attributable to its stockholders of $2,138,587.$2,703,825. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company commenced its new business related to the cultivation and production of oil from the seed of the Jatropha plant in September 2007. Management plans to meet its cash needs through various means including securing financing, entering into new joint ventures, through fees associated with management and development agreements and fees and profit sharing from developing the current business model. In order to fund its new operations, the Company has to date received $13,940,268$21,159,391 in capital contributions from the preferred membership interest in GCE Mexico I, LLC and(“GCE Mexico”), has issued mortgages in the total amount of $5,110,189 for the acquisition of land. The Company is developing the new business operation to participate in the rapidly growing bio-diesel industry. TheWhile the Company continues to expectexpects to be successful in this new venture, but there is no assurance that its business plan will be economically viable. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on that plan’s success. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 – Jatropha Business Venture
The Company entered into the bio-fuels business in 2007 by acquiring certain trade secrets, know-how, business plans, term sheets, business relationships, and other information relating to the cultivation and production of seed oil from the Jatropha plant for the production of bio-diesel, and by entering into certain employment agreements and property management agreements. Subsequent to entering into these transactions, the Company identifiedacquired certain real property in Mexico it believed to be suitable for cultivating the Jatropha plant. During 2008, GCE MexicoMexico’s subsidiary acquired the land in Mexico for the cultivation of the Jatropha plant. In July 2009, the Company acquired Technology Alternatives, Limited (“TAL”), a company formed under the laws of Belize that had developed a farm in Belize for cultivation of the Jatropha plant and provided technical advisory services for the propagation of the Jatropha plant. In March 2010, the Company formed Asideros 2, a Mexican corporation, which has acquired additional land in Mexico adjacent to the land acquired by Asideros.Asideros 1. In October 2011, the Company formed Asideros 3, a Mexican Corporation, which has acquired land in Mexico close to the land acquired by Asideros 1 and Asideros 2. All of these transactions are described in further detail in Note 1 above and in the remainder of the notes.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Mobius Consulting Agreement
The Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mobius pursuant to which Mobius agreed to provide consulting services to the Company in connection with the Company’s new Jatropha biofuel feedstock business. The Company engaged Mobius as a consultant to obtain Mobius’ experience and expertise in the feedstock/bio-diesel market to assist the Company and Mr. Palmer in developing this new line of operations for the Company. The original term of the agreement was twelve months. The Company terminated the agreement in July 2008, with the termination to become effective August 2008. The Company had recorded liabilities to Mobius of $322,897 for accrued, but unpaid, compensation and costs as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. However, the Company disputes these charges, and the additional amounts that Mobius claims that it is owed, and is currently in litigation with Mobius to resolve this liability. Mobius is related to the Company thru stock ownership.
LODEMO Agreement
On October 15, 2007, the Company entered into a service agreement with Corporativo LODEMO S.A DE CV, a Mexican corporation (the LODEMO Group), to provide services related to the establishment, development, and day-to-day operations of the Company’s Jatropha Business in Mexico. The Agreement had a 20-year term but could be terminated or modified earlier by the Company under certain circumstances. In June 2009, the scope of work previously performed by LODEMO was reduced and modified based upon certain labor functions being provided internally by the Company and by Asideros, the Company’s Mexican subsidiary, on a go-forward basis. This agreement was cancelled in 2009. As of December 31, 20112013 and as of December 31, 2010,2012, the Company’s financial statements reflect that it owes the LODEMO Group $251,500 for accrued, but unpaid, compensation and cost. The Company disputes the total of these charges and is currently in discussions with LODEMO to resolve this liability. The Lodemo Group is a shareholder of The Company.charges.
GCE Mexico I, LLC and Subsidiaries
GCE Mexico was organized primarily to facilitate the acquisition of the initial 5,000 acres of farm land (the Jatropha Farm) in the State of Yucatan in Mexico to be used primarily for the (i) cultivation of Jatropha curcas, (ii) the marketing and sale of the resulting fruit, seeds, or pre-processed crude Jatropha oil, whether as biodiesel, feedstock, biomass or otherwise, and (iii) the sale of carbon value, green fuel value, or renewable energy credit value (and other similar environmental attributes) derived from activities at the Jatropha Farm.
Under the LLC Agreement,GCE Mexico’s operating agreement, as amended (the “LLC Agreement”), the Company owns 50% of the issued and outstanding common membership units of GCE Mexico. The remaining 50% of the common membership units was initially issued to five of the Investors.investors. The Company and the other owners of the common membership interest were not required to make capital contributions to GCE Mexico.
In addition, two investors agreed to invest in GCE Mexico through the purchase of preferred membership units and through the funding of the purchase of land in Mexico. An aggregate of 1,000 preferred membership units were issued to these two investors who each agreed to make capital contributions to GCE Mexico in installments and as required, fund the development and operations of the Jatropha Farm. In November 2012, one of the two investors transferred 100% of the interest to the other investor. The preferred members have made capital contributions of $1,598,688 and $5,620,435 during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and total contributions of $21,159,391 have been received by GCE Mexico from these investors since the execution of the LLC Agreement. The LLC Agreement calls for additional contributions from the investors, as requested by management and as required by the operation in 2013 and the following years. The holder of the preferred membership interest is entitled to earn a preferential 12% per annum cumulative compounded return on the cumulative balance of the preferred membership interest. The preferential return increased by $2,479,148, and $2,055,904 during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and totals $7,442,730 since the execution of the LLC Agreement.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Our projected revenue sources are tenuous, and no assurance can be given that all anticipated revenues will, in fact, be received. At present, The Company is in discussions with certain of its existing shareholders to increase their equity investment in the Company, and we believe it is likely that the Company will be successful in raising sufficient funds to meet its operating expenses for the remainder of 2012; however no assurances can be given that this will be the case. Currently, the sole source of cash that we can classify as probable and material are reimbursement payments that we receive from additional capital contributions forecasted to be provided by the Preferred Members of GCE Mexico. These reimbursements are expected to cover approximately 25% of our corporate overhead for the remainder of 2012. Although we do not currently have any consulting agreements in place for 2012, we do expect to receive management consulting fees for Jatropha management and advisory services from third parties that enter into contracts with us in the future.
The net income or loss of the three Mexican subsidiaries that own the Mexico farms is allocated to itsthe shareholders based on their respective equity ownership, whichownership; 99% of the equity of each subsidiary is 99% toowned by GCE Mexico and 1% directly tois owned by the Company. GCE Mexico has no operations separate from its investments in the Mexican subsidiaries. According to the LLC Agreement of GCE Mexico, the net loss of GCE Mexico is allocated to its members according to their respective investment balances. Accordingly, since the common membership interest did not make a capital contribution, all of the losses have been allocated to the preferred membership interest. The noncontrolling interest presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets includes the carrying value of the preferred membership interests and of the common membership interests owned by the Investors, and excludes any common membership interest in GCE Mexico held by the Company.
Note 4 - Investment Held for SaleTechnology Alternatives, Limited
During 2010,On July 9, 2009, the Company ceasedpurchased 100% of the Technologiesstock of Technology Alternatives, Limited (“TAL”) operations. As all, a company formed under the laws of TAL’s nursery capabilities have since been transferred toBelize in Central America. TAL owned approximately 400 acres of land that was used as a Jatropha farm. The land was sold in May 2013.
The Company owed the Company’s other operations in Tizimin, Mexico and the Company is in the processformer shareholders of selling the land, the net assets have been reclassified as Investment Held for Sale at December 31, 2010 and 2011; the promissory notes are netted against the net assets. The Net Assets, measured at fair value asTAL $526,462 Belize dollars, including capitalized interest of December 31, 2011 were $565,473$10,322 Belize Dollars (US $291,031$280,170 based on exchange rates in effect on the funding date of May 17, 2013). The holders agreed to accept $195,747 USD as payment in full for the promissory notes when the land was sold on May 17, 2013 at December 31, 2011).a discounted sales price of $395,000 USD. The unpaid principal balance of $84,422 of the notes, plus accrued interest of $28,078, was forgiven by the shareholders and written off by the Company. The related gain on forgiveness is included in Loss on Sale of Investment Held for Sale on the statement of operations. The Gain on forgiveness was netted in our calculations for the Loss on Sale of Investment as the debt would not have been forgiven if the investment had not been sold. The debt forgiveness was conditional upon the sale of the investment.
The Company dissolved the wholly owned subsidiary, TAL on May 17, 2013. The prior accumulated decifit of TAL totaling $181,891 was netted out of the Stockholders’ equity as part of the transaction recording the Loss on Sale of Investment Held for Sale.
Note 54 – Property and Equipment
Property and Equipmentequipment are as follows:
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Land | | $ | 4,512,630 | | | $ | 4,539,314 | |
| Plantation development costs | | | 10,311,286 | | | | 9,229,638 | |
| Plantation equipment | | | 1,510,878 | | | | 1,546,971 | |
| Office equipment | | | 299,755 | | | | 108,598 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total cost | | | 16,634,549 | | | | 15,424,521 | |
| Less accumulated depreciation | | | (1,138,768 | ) | | | (865,518 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Property and equipment, net | | $ | 15,495,781 | | | $ | 14,559,002 | |
Depreciation expense for property and equipment was $280,027 and $267,807 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
| | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Land | | $ | 4,217,604 | | | $ | 2,435,722 | |
| Plantation development costs | | | 6,945,617 | | | | 4,805,940 | |
| Plantation equipment | | | 1,199,503 | | | | 1,108,467 | |
| Office equipment | | | 110,031 | | | | 89,721 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total cost | | | 12,472,755 | | | | 8,439,850 | |
| Less accumulated depreciation | | | (567,573 | ) | | | (336,313 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Property and equipment, net | | $ | 11,905,182 | | | $ | 8,103,537 | |
Commencing in June 2008, the CompanyAsideros I purchased certain equipment for purposes of rapidly clearing the land, preparing the land for planting, and actually planting the Jatropha trees. The Company has capitalized farming equipment and costs related to the development of land for farm use in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for accounting by agricultural producers and agricultural cooperatives. Plantation equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 5 to 15 years. Depreciation expense has been capitalized as part of plantation development costs through the date that the plantation becomes commercially productive. The initial plantations were deemed to be commercially productive on October 1, 2009, at which date the Company commenced the depreciation of plantation development costs over estimated useful lives of 10 to 35 years, depending on the nature of the development. Developments and other improvements with indefinite lives are capitalized and not depreciated. Other developments that have a limited life and intermediate-life plants that have growth and production cycles of more than one year are being depreciated over their useful lives once they are placed in service. The land, plantation development costs, and plantation equipment are located in Mexico.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Intangible Assets
In March 2013, the Company purchased certain intangible assets related to the commercial production of Camelina. See further discussion on acquisition in Note 10. The intangible assets include three patents and the related intellectual property associated with these patents. These intangible assets acquired have an expected useful life of 17 years and are carried at cost less any accumulated amortization and any impairment losses.
Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of the intangible assets over their estimated useful lives of 17 years. Any future costs associated with the maintenance of these patents with indefinite lives will be capitalized and not amortized. The Intangible Assets as of the year ended December 31, 2013 is shown in the following table:
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Intangible Assets | | | 4,168,841 | | | | - | |
| Less accumulated amortization | | | (195,892 | ) | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Intantigle Assets, net | | $ | 3,972,950 | | | $ | - | |
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $195,892 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and none in 2012. The estimated amortization expense for the next five years approximates $229,000 annually.
Note 6 – Accrued Payroll and Payroll TaxesDebt
A significant portion of accrued payroll and payroll taxes relates to unpaid compensation for officers and directors that are no longer affiliated with the Company. Accrued payroll taxes will become due upon payment of the related accrued compensation.
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes are composed of the following:
| | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Accrued payroll, vacation, and related payroll taxes | | | | | | |
| for current officers | | $ | 965,946 | | | $ | 1,012,176 | |
| Former Chief Executive Officer, resigned 2007 | | | - | | | | 570,949 | |
| Other former officers and directors | | | 77,750 | | | | 77,750 | |
| Accrued payroll taxes on accrued compensation to | | | | | | | | |
| former officers and directors | | | 3,067 | | | | 25,590 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued payroll and payroll taxes | | $ | 1,046,763 | | | $ | 1,686,465 | |
Notes Payable
On August 31, 2007,November 1, 2012, the Company entered into a Release and Settlement Agreement with Judy Robinett, the Company’s then-current Chief Executive Officer. Under the agreement, Ms. Robinett agreednote payable to among other things, assist the CompanyMobius in the saleaggregate amount of its legacy assets$75,000. The note bears interest at 5% and completeis unsecured. Principal and interest on this Note shall be payable monthly in the preparation and filingamount of $5,000, commencing on May 1, 2013 with the delinquent reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the agreement, Ms. Robinett agreed to (i) forgive her potential right to receive $1,851,805 in accrued and unpaid compensation, un-accrued and pro-rata bonuses, and severance pay and (ii) the cancellation of stock options to purchase 14,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. In consideration for her services, the forgiveness of the foregoing cash payments, the cancellation of the stock options, and settlement of other issues, the Company agreed, among other things, to pay Ms. Robinett $500,000 upon the receipt of the cashfinal payment under the agreement to sell the SaveCream Assets to Eucodis Pharmaceuticals Forschungs und Entwicklungs GmbH (Eucodis). Pursuant to this agreement, Ms. Robinett resigneddue on December 21, 2007. Despite the Company’s efforts, the sale to Eucodis was never completed and Eucodis has since ceased operations. Accordingly, the conditions precedent to make the $500,000 payment from the Eucodis proceeds described above has not been fulfilled, i.e., the Company’s sale of the SaveCream Assets to Eucodis did not occur. As such the Company does not believe that Ms. Robinett is entitled to this payment and has written off all accruals related to Ms. Robinett. Furthermore, the Company subsequently sold the SaveCream Assets to an unaffiliated third party on November 16, 2009.September 1, 2014.
Note 7 – Debt
Promissory Notes
Mercator Momentum Fund III
In order to fund ongoing operations pending closing of the sale of the SaveCream Assets, the Company entered into a loan agreement with, and issued a promissory note in favor of, Mercator Momentum Fund III, L.P. (Mercator) in September 2007. This note plus $81,909 of accrued interest was paid off in March 2010 from the proceeds of newly-issued convertible promissory notes and common stock warrants.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes Payable to Shareholders
TheIncluded in notes payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, the Company has notes payable to certain shareholders in the aggregate amount of $26,000 at December 31, 20112013 and December 31, 2010.2012. The notes originated between 1997 andin 1999, bear interest at 12%, are unsecured, and are currently in default. Accrued interest on the notes totaled $46,415$52,643 and $43,278$49,540, respectively at December 31, 20112013 and December 31, 2010,2012, respectively.
TheAs more fully disclosed in Note 3 the Company hashad issued promissory notes to the former shareholders of TAL in the aggregate amount of $526,462 Belize dollars, (US $270,953$268,630 based on exchange rates in effect at December 31, 2011)2012), including capitalized interest of $10,322 Belize Dollars. These notes payable to shareholders were interest free through September 30, 2009, and then bear interest at 8% per annum through the maturity date. The notes arewere secured by a mortgage on the land and related improvements.improvements, all of which were sold on May 17, 2013 at a discounted price of $395,000. The holders agreed to accept $195,747 as payment in full for these mortgage notes plus any related accrued interest, were duewhen the land was sold on July 15, 2011, butMay 17, 2013. The balance of $84,422 in notes payable was forgiven by the due date has been extendedholders and written off.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to August 16, 2012.Consolidated Financial Statements
Convertible Notes Payable
In March 2010, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with the preferred members of GCE Mexico pursuant to which the Company issued senior unsecured convertible promissory notes in the original aggregate principal amount of $567,000 and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 1,890,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Convertible Notes maturematured on the earlier of (i) March 16, 2012, or (ii) upon written demand of payment by the note holders following the Company’s default thereunder. The maturity date of the Convertible Notes may be extended by written notice made by the note holders at any time prior to March 16, 2012. These notes have been extended to September 2013.until March 15, 2015. Interest accrues on the convertible notes at a rate of 5.97% per annum, and is payable quarterly in cash, in arrears, on each nine-monthyear anniversary of the issuance of the convertible notes. The Company may at its option, in lieu of paying interest in cash, pay interest by delivering a number of unregistered shares of its common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the amount of such interest by the arithmetic average of the volume weighted average price for each of the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding the interest payment date. At any time following the first anniversary of the issuance of the Convertible Notes, at the option of the note holders, the outstanding balance thereof (including unpaid interest) may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.03. The conversion price may be adjusted in connection with stock splits, stock dividends and similar events affecting the Company’s capital stock. The convertible notes rank senior to all other indebtedness of the Company, and thereafter will remain senior or pari passu with all accounts payable and other similar liabilities incurred by the Company in the ordinary course of business. The Company may not prepay the convertible notes without the prior consent of the Investors.
The warrants have been exercised in the year ending December 31, 2011 and the proceeds from that purchase were used for general corporate purposes. All of the proceeds from the issuance of the original debt were allocated to the Convertible Notes. The Company used substantially all of the proceeds received from the sale of the convertible promissory notes to repay, in full, an outstanding promissory note in the amount of $475,000, plus accrued interest of $81,909.Mortgage Notes Payable
The Company has other convertible notes payable to certain individuals in the aggregate amount of $193,200 at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The notes originated in 1996, bear interest at 12%, are unsecured, and are currently in default. Each $1,000 note is convertible into 667 shares of the Company’s common stock. Accrued interest on the convertible notes totaled $318,351 and $295,167 at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Mortgage Notes Payable
Two investors holding the preferred membership units of GCE Mexico also directly funded the purchase by Asideros I of approximately 5,000 acres of land in the State of Yucatan in Mexico by the payment of $2,051,282, The land was acquired in the name of Asideros I, and Asideros I issued a mortgage in the amount of $2,051,282 in favor of thesethe two original investors. These two investors also directly funded the purchase by Asideros 2 of approximately 4,500 acres, and a second parcel by Asideros 2 of approximately 600 acres of land adjacent to the land owned by Asideros I by the total payment of $963,382. The land was acquired in the name of Asideros 2 and Asideros 2 issued mortgages in the amount of $963,382 in favor of these two investors. These mortgages bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum, payable quarterly. The Board has directed that this interest shall continueparties have agreed to accrue the interest until such time as the Board determines that there is sufficient cash flow to pay all accrued interest. The initial mortgage, including any unpaid interest, is due in April 2018. The second mortgage, including any unpaid interest, is due in February 2020.
In October 2011, thesethe two original investors also directly funded the purchase by Asideros 3 of approximately 5,600 acres for a total $2,095,525. The land was acquired in the name of Asideros 3 and Asideros 3 issued mortgages in the amount of $2,095,525 in favor of these two investors. These mortgages bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum, payable quarterly. The Board has directed that this interest shall continue to accrue until such time as the Board determines that there is sufficient cash flow to pay all accrued interest. The initial mortgage, including any unpaid interest, is due in October 2021.
Technology Alternatives, LimitedIn November 2012, one of the two holders of the preferred membership interests acquired all of the ownership interests of the other member. Accordingly, all of the foregoing obligations are now owed to the sole holder of GCE Mexico’s preferred membership interests.
On October 29, 2008, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with the shareholders of TAL, a company formed under the laws of Belize in Central America. Subsequently, the terms and conditions of the stock purchase agreement were modified prior to closing. The closing was primarily delayed to allow TAL to complete all required conditions for the closing. On July 2, 2009, all closing requirements were completed and the Company consummated the stock purchase agreement by issuing 8,952,757 shares of its common stock in exchange for 100% of the equity interests of TAL. TAL owns approximately 400 acres of land and has developed a Jatropha farm in stages over the last three years for the cultivation of the Jatropha plant. TAL developed a nursery capable of producing Jatropha seeds, seedlings and rooted cuttings. During 2009, TAL commenced selling seeds, principally to GCE Mexico.Promissory Notes Payable
In connectionMarch 2013, the Company issued a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $1,300,000 to Targeted Growth, Inc. for certain Camelina assets. The purchase occurred concurrently with the acquisition certain payablesof Sustainable Oils, LLC. The note bears an interest rate of ten percent (10.0%) per annum, and is payable upon the earlier of the following: (a) to the former shareholdersextent of TAL were renegotiated35.1% of, and converted into promissory noteson the third business day after, the receipt by the Company of any Qualified Funding; or (b) September 13, 2014 (the “Maturity Date”). The term “Qualified Funding” means all equity funding in excess of the $800,000, in the aggregate, principal amountreceived by the Company, its subsidiary or an affiliate after the date hereof for its Camelina business. In September 2014, we renegotiated the terms fo the agreement and returned these machines, tractors, and vehicles to Targeted Growth, Inc. in consideration for a reduction of $516,139 Belize Dollars (US $268,036 based on exchange rates in effect at July 2, 2009). These notes payable to shareholders were interest free through September 30, 2009,outstanding balance of the Promissory Note and then bear interest at 8% per annum throughthe extension of the maturity date.date of the Promissory Note to December 31, 2014. The notes arecurrent note is no longer secured by a mortgage on the land and related improvements. The notes, plus any related accrued interest, were due on July 15, 2011 and have been extended until August 15, 2012.assets.
Lease Commitment
During June 2010, the Company entered into a new two-year and two month lease agreement with average monthly payments including prescribed common area fees of $3,400, with a 3% annual increase in lease payments. Rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $44,958. Future minimum lease payments under operating lease obligations as of December 31, 2011 is $28,000.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Plantation equipment recorded under two capital leases is included in “property and equipment” and amounted to $77,396 at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Depreciation of the capitalized asset is computed on the straight-line basis term and is being capitalized in plantation development cost until the farm is operational. The total accumulated depreciation is $6,105 and $418 as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Imputed interest on the lease is 13.25% with principal and interest due in equal monthly installments of $1,309 each, or $2,618 combined. The balance of the leases payable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $43,585 and $72,725 respectively, and is due to be paid in full by October 2013.
Plantation equipment under two additional capital leases is included in “property and equipment” and amounted to $56,383 at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Depreciation of the capitalized asset is computed on the straight-line basis over the lease term and will be capitalized in plantation development cost. The total accumulated depreciation for this asset was $4,100 and $0 as of December 2011 and 2010, respectively. Imputed interest on the lease is 13.25% with principal and interest due in equal monthly installments of $953 each, or $1,906 combined. The balance of the leases payable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $34,091 and $55,098, respectively, and is due to be paid in full by December 2013.
Transportation equipment recorded under a capital lease is included in “property and equipment” and amounted to $19,095 at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Depreciation of the capitalized asset is computed on the straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in depreciation expense. Accumulated depreciation expense totals $5,083 and $1,436 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Imputed interest on the lease is 14.50%,with principal and interest due in monthly installments of $784. The balance of the lease payable as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, was $9,839 and $17,688, respectively, and is due to be paid in full in 30 equal monthly installments, or by March 2013.
Future minimum lease payments under capital lease obligations as of December 31, 2011 were as follows:
| Year Ending | | | |
| December 31, | | | |
| 2012 | | $ | 56,680 | |
| 2013 | | | 44,292 | |
| | | | 100,972 | |
| Less amount representing interest | | | (13,457 | ) |
| Capital Lease Payable | | $ | 87,515 | |
| | | | | |
| Less Current portion | | | (56,257 | ) |
| Long Term Capital Lease Liability | | $ | 31,258 | |
Settlement of Liabilities
The Company has settled certain liabilities previously carried on the consolidated balance sheet, which settlements resulted in significant gains. The totalgains from the extinguishment of liabilities. There was a $50,138 gain on settlement of liabilities for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20112013, and a gain on settlement of liabilities of $1,013,387 for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $1,024,0762012. The gains in 2013 and $601,114, respectively. This gain was2012 were primarily from the settlement or expiration of historic liabilities primarily incurred by prior management in connection with the discontinued pharmaceutical operations that had been on the Company’s records for several years.operations. In addition, the Company determined thatwrote off certain liabilities that had been extinguished with the passage of time for collection under the laws related to the statuteapplicable statutes of limitations. Accordingly, the Company removed the liabilities from the records and recorded a corresponding gain on settlement of liabilities.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementslimitation laws.
Note 8 –7 - Equity (Deficit)
Common Stock
On March 30, 2010 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement whereby the Company agreed to issue and sell 25,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.02 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $500,000, which was paid in cash.
On April 25, 2011 an accredited investor in the Company exercised a Warrant for 945,000 shares at $.03 per share for net cash proceeds paid to the Company of $28,350. The proceeds from this sale were used for general corporate purposes.
On May 31, 2011 an accredited investor in the Company exercised a Warrant for 945,000 shares at $.03 per share for net cash proceeds paid to the Company of $28,350. The proceeds from this sale were used for general corporate purposes.
In July, 2011 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement whereby the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.04 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $400,000, which was paid in cash.
In August, 2011, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement whereby the Company issued 2,083,334 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.048 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000, which was paid in cash.
On July, 2011, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement whereby the Company issued 625,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for services rendered.
Series B Preferred Stock
In order to obtain additional working capital, on November 6, 2007, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with two accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company sold a total of 13,000 shares of our newly authorized Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $1,300,000, less offering costs of $9,265. Each share of the Series B Shares has a stated value of $100.
The Series B Shares may, at the option of each holder, be converted at any time or from time to time into shares of the Company’s common stock at the conversion price then in effect. The number of shares into which one Series B Share shall be convertible is determined by dividing $100 per share by the conversion price then in effect. The initial conversion price per share for the Series B Shares is $0.11, which is subject to adjustment for certain events, including stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, or other recapitalizations affecting the Series B Shares.
Each holder of Series B Shares is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock into which the Series B Shares could be converted on the record date for such vote, and has voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the holders of the Company’s common stock. In the event of the Company’s dissolution or winding up, each share of the Series B Shares is entitled to be paid an amount equal to $100 (plus any declared and unpaid dividends) out of the assets of the Company then available for distribution to shareholders.
No dividends are required to be paid to holders of the Series B shares. However, the Company may not declare, pay or set aside any dividends on shares of any class or series of the Company’s capital stock (other than dividends on shares of our common stock payable in shares of common stock) unless the holders of the Series B shares shall first receive, or simultaneously receive, an equal dividend on each outstanding share of Series B shares.
Common Stock
In April 2012, the Company issued 8,620,690 shares to an accredited investor at a price of $.029 per share for cash proceeds paid to the Company of $250,000. The proceeds from this sale were used for general corporate purposes.
In March 2013, the Company issued 40,000,000 shares, at $.02 per share as partial considertion of the business purchase that included certain assets, patents, and other intellectual property and rights related to the development of Camelina sativa as a biofuels feedstock that it acquired.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 98 – Stock Options and Warrants
Stock Options and Compensation-Based Warrants
The Company has threean incentive stock option plansplan wherein 44,000,00020,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are reserved for issuance there under. The Company granted stock options during the year ended December 31, 2010 to acquire 12,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company also issued compensation-based warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock to a law firm. Effective April 1, 2010, the Company appointed Martin Wenzel to its board of directors. Mr. Wenzel was granted an option to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The option vests over ten equal monthly installments commencing May 1, 2010 and expires on April 1, 2015.
On July 19, 2010, the stockholders approved the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. The granting of options and other stock awards is an important incentive tool for the Company’s employees, officers and directors. The 2010 Plan provides a means by which employees, directors and consultants of the Company may be given an opportunity to benefit from increases in the value of our common stock, and to attract and retain the services of such persons. All of our employees, directors and consultants are eligible to participate in the 2010 Plan. The total number of shares of common stock which may be offered, or issued as restricted stock or on the exercise of options or Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) under the Plan shall not exceed twenty million (20,000,000) shares of common stock. The shares subject to an option or SAR granted under the Plan that expire, terminate or are cancelled unexercised shall become available again for grants under this Plan. If shares of restricted stock awarded under the Plan are forfeited to the Company or repurchased by the Company, the number of shares forfeited or repurchased shall again be available under the Plan. Where the exercise price of an option is paid by means of the optionee’s surrender of previously owned shares of common stock or the Company’s withholding of shares otherwise issuable upon exercise of the option as may be permitted herein, only the net number of shares issued and which remain outstanding in connection with such exercise shall be deemed “issued” and no longer available for issuance under this Plan. No eligible person shall be granted options or other awards during any twelve-month period covering more than Five Hundred Thousand (500,000) shares of common stock.
On July 1, 2010, the Company granted stock options to acquire 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to non-employee directors. These options are exercisable at $0.04 per share, vest monthly over ten months starting August 1, 2010, and expire June 30, 2015.
On August 17, 2010, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, and directed management to issue 900,000 share options to certain consultants in the United States and certain employees in Mexico. These options shall vest over the next 12 to 24 months and have an exercise price of $0.04 per share.thereunder.
No income tax benefit has been recognized for share-based compensation arrangements. The Company has recognized plantation development costs totaling $124,565 related to a liability that was satisfied by the issuance of warrants in 2008. Otherwise, no share-based compensation cost has been capitalized in the consolidated balance sheet.
A summary of the status of options and compensation-based warrants at December 31, 2011 and 2010,2013, and changes during the yearsyear then ended is presented in the following table:
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted | | Average | | | | | | | | Weighted | | Average | | | |
| | | Shares | | | Average | | Remaining | | Aggregate | | | Shares | | | Average | | Remaining | | Aggregate | |
| | | Under | | | Exercise | | Contractual | | Intrinsic | | | Under | | | Exercise | | Contractual | | Intrinsic | |
| | | Option | | | Price | | Life | | Value | | | Option | | | Price | | Life | | Value | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | | | 61,209,083 | | | $ | 0.03 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2012 | | | | 68,608,483 | | | $ | 0.02 | | 4.3 years | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Granted | | | 14,650,000 | | | | 0.02 | | | | | | | | 14,100,000 | | | | 0.01 | | | | | | |
| Exercised | | | (5,827,600 | ) | | | 0.01 | | | | $ | 268,070 | | | | (1,477,089 | ) | | | 0.01 | | | | | | |
| Forfeited | | | | (6,280,000 | ) | | | 0.01 | | | | | | |
| Expired | | | (500,000 | ) | | | 0.25 | | | | | | | | | (5,576,083 | ) | | | 0.03 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2010 | | | 69,531,483 | | | | 0.03 | | 5.1 years | | $ | 450,970 | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | | | | 69,375,311 | | | | 0.02 | | 9.1 years | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Granted | | | 7,350,000 | | | | 0.04 | | | | | - | | |
| Exercised | | | - | | | | - | | | | | - | | |
| Expired | | | (2,150,000 | ) | | | 0.06 | | | | | - | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2011 | | | 74,731,483 | | | | 0.03 | | 4.7 years | | $ | 192,033 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exercisable at December 31, 2011 | | | 55,181,483 | | | $ | 0.03 | | 3.2 years | | $ | 178,226 | | |
| Exercisable at December 31, 2013 | | | | 51,346,144 | | | $ | 0.02 | | 3.1 years | | | - | |
At December 31, 2011, options to acquire 80,000 shares of common stock have no stated contractual life. The fair value of other stock option grants and compensation-based warrants is estimated on the date of grant or issuance using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. 7,350,000 optionsOptions to purchase 14,100,000 shares of common stock were issued in the year ended December 31, 20112013 and 14,650,000 options and 1,890,000 warrants were issued13,780,000 in the twelve-month periodyear ended 2012. The weighted average fair value of stock options issued during the years ended December 31, 2010.2013 and 2012 as $0.015 and $.00916, respectively. The weighted-average assumptions used for the stock options granted and compensation-based warrants issued during the yearyears ended December 31, 20112013 and 2012 were risk-free interest rate of 2.0%1.30% and .628%, volatility of 154%181% and 178%, expected life of 5.0 years, and dividend yield of zero. The assumptions employed in the Black-Scholes option pricing model include the following; the expected life of stock options represents the period of time that the stock options granted are expected to be outstanding prior to exercise; theexercise. The expected volatility is based on the historical price volatility of the Company’s common stock; thestock. The risk-free interest rate represents the U.S. Treasury constant maturities rate for the expected life of the related stock options; theoptions. The dividend yield represents anticipated cash dividends to be paid over the expected life of the stock options; theoptions. The intrinsic values are based on a December 31, 20112013 closing price of $0.022$0.01 per share.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Share-based compensation from all sources recorded during the year ended December 31, 20112013 and 20102012 was $137,271$124,492 and $115,268,$86,015, respectively, and is reported as general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2011,2013, there is approximately $191,841$148,567 of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock-based payments that will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.230.29 years.
Stock Warrants
Stock Warrants
A summary of the status of the warrants outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010,2013, and changes during the yearsyear then ended is presented in the following table:
| | | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | | |
| | | Shares | | | Average | | Average | | Aggregate | |
| | | Under | | | Exercise | | Remaining | | Intrinsic | |
| | | Warrant | | | Price | | Contractual Life | | Value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2012 | | | 24,585,662 | | | $ | 0.01 | | .75 years | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 314184 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issued | | | 2,000,000 | | | | - | | | | | | |
| Exercised | | | (4,026,954 | ) | | | 0.01 | | | | $ | (40,270 | ) |
| Expired | | | (20,558,708 | ) | | | 0.01 | | | | $ | (205,587 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 9 - Acquisition of Camelina Assets and Sustainable Oils
On March 13, 2013, the Company completed a business purchase that included certain assets, patents, and other intellectual property and rights related to the development of Camelina sativa as a biofuels feedstock (the “Camelina Assets”) from Targeted Growth, Inc., a Washington based crop biotechnology company focused on developing products with enhanced yield and improved quality for the agriculture and energy industries. Also on March 13, 2013, we purchased all of the membership interests of Sustainable Oils, LLC, (SusOils) a Delaware limited liability company, from Targeted Growth, Inc. and the other, minority owner of that limited liability company. SusOils is a company that, since 2007, has been engaged in the development, production and commercialization of Camelina-based biofuels and FDA approved animal feed. Substantially all of the Camelina Assets were previously owned by SusOils and used in SusOils’ operations.
The Camelina Assets include: three issued U.S. patents on Camelina Sativa varieties; a substantial portfolio of other intellectual property assets, all of the Seller’s intellectual property related to the research, development, breeding and/or genetic development of Camelina; germplasm; licenses, consents, permits, variances, certifications and approvals granted by any governmental agencies relating to Camelina operations; machines, equipment, tractors and vehicles used in Camelina operations; the name “Sustainable Oils” and the Sustainable Oils logo; and certain trade secrets, know-how, and technical data.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
We currently intend to operate our Camelina business through a new subsidiary. We intend to capitalize that new subsidiary with the Sustainable Oils intellectual properties and operating assets that we recently purchased. In order to fund the operations and expansion of the Camelina operations, we intend to raise additional capital through the sale of debt or equity in the newly formed Camelina subsidiary. Sustainable Oils’ operations have been headquartered in Bozeman, Montana. We intend to continue to conduct our Camelina operations in Montana. Accordingly, in March 2013, we entered into a sublease with Targeted Oils, Inc., to sublease a portion of Targeted Growth’s research facilities and administrative offices in Bozeman, Montana.
| | | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | | |
| | | Shares | | | Average | | Average | | Aggregate | |
| | | Under | | | Exercise | | Remaining | | Intrinsic | |
| | | Warrant | | | Price | | Contractual Life | | Value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | | | 29,742,552 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | | | |
| Issued | | | 1,890,000 | | | $ | 0.03 | | | | | |
| Exercised | | | (4,575,495 | ) | | $ | 0.01 | | | | $ | 210,473 | |
| Expired | | | (581,395 | ) | | $ | 0.13 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2010 | | | 26,475,662 | | | | 0.01 | | 2.75 years | | $ | 274,530 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issued | | | - | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exercised | | | (1,890,000 | ) | | $ | 0.03 | | | | $ | 18,900 | |
| Expired | | | - | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2011 | | | 24,585,662 | | | $ | 0.01 | | 1.75 years | | $ | 457,550 | |
BecauseWe paid for the Company has net operating loss carryforwards availableCamelina Assets by issuing to Targeted Growth, Inc. (i) a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $1,300,000 (the “Promissory Note” – see note 6 for income tax purposes, theremore details) and (ii) an aggregate of 40,000,000 shares of our common stock. Of the 40,000,000 shares, 4,000,000 shares will be held by an escrow agent for 15 months following the closing for the purpose of providing a partial security to support the indemnity provisions of the purchase agreement. All shares were no excess tax benefits chargedissued in June 2014.
The fair value of the consideration transferred to additional paid-in capital as a result of warrants exercised duringTargeted Growth, Inc. is in the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
following table:
| Investment in Camelina Assets | | | |
| N/P to Targeted Growth | | | 1,300,000 | |
| Cash (paid out) | | | 100 | |
| Common stock issued | | | 800,000 | |
| | | 2,100,100 | |
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Palmer Employment Agreement
Effective September 1, 2007,The purchase price for the Company entered intoSustainable Oils, LLC membership interests was $100. Sustainable Oils’ assets include 295,000 pounds of “certified” Camelina seeds that we intend to sell to farmers this year and/or next year for the production of Camelina feedstock. The liabilities of Sustainable Oils include an employment agreement with Richard Palmer pursuantapproximately $2.3 million liability to UOP LLC, which the Company hired Mr. Palmer to serve as its President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Palmer was also appointed to serve asis secured by a directorlien on the Company’s Board of Directors to serve until the next election of directors by the Company’s shareholders. Upon the resignationthree patents we acquired as part of the former Chief Executive Officer on December 21, 2007, Mr. Palmer also became the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.Camelina Assets. The Company hired Mr. Palmer to take advantage of his experience and expertise in the feedstock/bio-diesel industry, and in particular, in the Jatropha bio-diesel and feedstock business. The term of employment currently expires on September 30, 2012.
Mr. Palmer’s compensation package includes an annual base salary of $250,000, subject to annual increases based on changes in the Consumer Price Index, and a bonus payment based on Mr. Palmer’s satisfaction of certain performance criteria established by the compensation committeeamounts recognized as of the Company’s Boardacquisition date for each major class of Directors. assets acquired and liabilities assumed are as follows:
| | | Fair Values at | |
| | | Acquisition | |
| | | Date | |
| Prepaids and other assets | | $ | 260 | |
| Inventory | | | 123,585 | |
| Intangible Assets | | | 4,168,855 | |
| Equipment | | | 190,500 | |
| Accounts Payable to UOP | | | (2,286,727 | ) |
| Commitment for field testing | | | (54,034 | ) |
| Other accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | (42,339 | ) |
| Total net assets of Sustainable Oils | | $ | 2,100,100 | |
The
bonus amount in any fiscal year will not exceed 100% of Mr. Palmer’s base salary.
Cardenas Employment Agreement
On November 16, 2011the Company entered into an employment agreement with Gregory Cardenas pursuant to which the Company hired Mr. Cardenas to serve as its Chief Financial Officer. The initial term of employment expired on November 16, 2014, but, according to its terms, automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the employment agreement.
Mr. Cardenas’s compensation package includes a base salary of $175,000, subject to annual increases based on the Consumer Price Index for the immediately preceding 12-month period, and a bonus payment based on Mr. Cardenas’s satisfaction of certain performance criteria established by the compensation committeevalue of the Company’s Boardacquired identifiable intangible assets of Directors. The bonus amount in any fiscal year will not exceed 100%$4,168,855 has been recorded as of Mr.Cardenas’s base salary. Mr. Cardenas is eligible to participate in the Company’s employee stock option plan and other benefit plans.
acquisition date of March 13, 2013.
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company granted Mr. Cardenas an option (the Initial Option) to acquire up to 2,000,000 sharesFor accounting purposes, the acquisition of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.037. The Initial Option had 500,000 shares vest immediately. The remaining 1,500,000 vests in 30 equal successive monthly installments beginning on May 31, 2012. The Initial Option expires after 10 years. The Company also granted Mr. Cardenas an option (the Performance Option) to acquire up to 3,000,000 sharesCamelina Assets and all of the Company’s common stock at an exercise pricemembership interests of $0.037, subject toSustainable Oils, LLC is treated as the acquisition of Sustainable Oil’s business. The amounts of Sustainable Oils, LLC 's revenue and earnings included in the Company’s achievement of certain market capitalization goals. The Performance Option expires after three years.
The Company has accountedconsolidated income statement for the options under Mr. Cardenas’s employment agreement as share-based compensation. The Company valued these options at $185,000 using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The weighted average fair value of the stock options was $0.037 per share. The weighted-average assumptions used for the calculation of fair value were risk-free rate of 1.90%, volatility of 158%, expected life of 6 years, and dividend yield of zero. The Company amortized this compensation over the vesting period for the Initial Option and over the period of time in which the satisfaction of market capitalization milestones for the Performance Option was expected to be fulfilled that would result in the vesting of these stock options.
Note 10 - Discontinued Operations
For the year ended December 31, 20112013, and the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity had the acquisition date been January 1, 2013 and January 1, 2012, are as follows:
| | | Revenue | | | Net Losses | |
| Actual March 13, 2013 - December 31, 2013 | | $ | 61,588 | | | $ | (342,587 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 Supplemental pro forma from | | $ | 332,320 | | | $ | (1,961,281 | ) |
| January 1 - December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 2012 Supplemental pro forma from | | $ | 2,843,917 | | | $ | 195,920 | |
| January 1 - December 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | |
The cost incurred related to the acquisition of Sustainable Oils, LLC includes approximately $21,500 in legal and $6,000 in valuation fees.
The foregoing pro forma data is subject to various assumptions and estimates, and is presented for informational purposes only. This pro forma data does not purport to represent or be indicative of the consolidated operating results that would have been reported had the transaction been completed as described herein, and the data should not be taken as indicative of future consolidated operating results.
Note 10 – Impairment of assets and fair value measurements
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. To measure fair value, a hierarchy has been established by generally accepted accounting principles which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. This hierarchy uses three levels of inputs to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in less active markets, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis to measure certain assets when applying lower of cost or fair value accounting or when adjusting carrying values. Fair value is also used when evaluating impairment on certain assets, including deferred growing costs and property and equipment.
The following is a tabular presentation of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis along with the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurement falls as of December 31, 2013:
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
| | | | | | Fair Value of Measurements at Reporting | |
| | | December 31, | | | Date Using | |
| Description | | 2013 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| Deferred Growing Cost | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| Plantation Development Cost | | | 10,311,286 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 10,311,286 | |
| | | $ | 10,311,286 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 10,311,286 | |
The Company performed an analysis of long-lived assets and has identified certain areas considered to be fallow based on the following condition of the trees: no vegetative growth for the age of the trees, bad origins, bad land preparation, and no resistance to fungus. The trees are not expected to produce a commercial yield or generate any future revenues. As such, the Company has identified the costs associated with these areas originally capitalized as Plantation Development Cost and Deferred Growing Cost, which capitalized costs are not expected to be recoverable, and has recognized the following impairment charges for the period ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, deferred growing costs, with a carrying value of $3,440,904 and $4,562,981, respectively, were written down to the fair value of $0.00 and $3,378,990 resulting in impairment charges of $3,440,904 and $1,183,991, which were included in operating expenses for the respective periods. The Company estimated the fair value of these assets using the income based approach considering the cash flows that would be obtained as a result of distribution of product tied to those deferred growing costs. The income based approach utilizes unobservable inputs. Due to the use of unobservable inputs, we classify the fair value of these growing areas within Level 3.
The Company did not write down any plantation development costs in the year ended December 31, 2010, Income from Discontinued Operations consists of the foreign currency transaction gains related to current liabilities associated with the discontinued operations that are denominated in Euros.
Note 11 – Related parties
2013. During the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, plantation development costs (included in property and equipment), which had a carrying value of $9,685,462 were written down to the fair value of $9,229,638, resulting in an impairment charge of $455,824, which was included in loss from continuing operations for the period. The Company estimated the fair value of these assets using the income based approach considering the cash flows that would be obtained as a result of the production and distribution of product in areas of continued production. The income based approach utilizes unobservable inputs. Due to the use of unobservable inputs, we classify the fair value of these growing areas within Level 3.
Note 11 - Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided for temporary differences between financial and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The following is a reconciliation of the amount of benefit that would result from applying the federal statutory rate to pretax loss with the benefit from income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
| Rate Reconciliation | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Federal income tax (benefit) at statutory rate (34%) | | $ | (2,552,000 | ) | | $ | (1,114,000 | ) |
| State income tax (benefit) , net of federal benefit | | | (100,000 | ) | | | 12,000 | |
| Foreign income tax benefit | | | - | | | | 7,000 | |
| Losses allocated to preferred members of GCE Mexico | | | 1,971,000 | | | | 1,151,000 | |
| Losses allocated GEHD | | | 15,000 | | | | 22,000 | |
| Share-based compensation | | | 38,000 | | | | 54,000 | |
| Expiration of operating loss and research credit carryforwards | | | - | | | | 75,000 | |
| Other differences | | | 5,000 | | | | (2,000 | ) |
| Change in valuation allowance | | | 623,000 | | | | (205,000 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows at December 31, 2013 and 2012, using a combined deferred income tax rate of 40%:
| Components of Net Deferred Taxes | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| Net operating loss carryforward | | $ | 7,225,000 | | | $ | 6,839,000 | |
| Share-based compensation | | | 781,000 | | | | 692,000 | |
| Accrued compensation and other liabilities | | | 647,000 | | | | 499,000 | |
| Impairment of long lived assets | | | 58,000 | | | | 58,000 | |
| Other | | | (2,000 | ) | | | (2,000 | ) |
| Valuation allowance | | | (8,709,000 | ) | | | (8,086,000 | ) |
| Net deferred tax asset | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
The Company has available net operating losses of approximately $21,052,000 which can be utilized to offset future earnings of the Company. The utilization of the net operating losses are dependent upon the tax laws in effect at the time such losses can be utilized. The loss carryforwards expire between the years 2014 and 2033. Should the Company paid $42,472 in legal fees toexperience a law firm related tosignificant change of ownership, the Chief Executive Officer.utilization of net operating losses could be reduced.
The Company and its subsidiaries file tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and, in the state of California. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for tax years before and including December 31, 2009. The Company is no longer subject to examination by state tax authorities for tax years before and including December 31, 2008. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not recognize interest and penalties.
Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
In February 2014, the Company entered into a lease agreement for 1,296 square feet of office space from February 1, 2014 to January 31, 2019. Rent payments range from $2,332.80 to $2,625.59 over the term. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $42,982 and $40,880, respectively. The following represents future annual minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2013:
GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
| Year Ending | | | |
| December 31, | | | |
| 2014 | | $ | 24,495 | |
| 2015 | | | 28,763 | |
| 2016 | | | 29,626 | |
| 2017 | | | 30,515 | |
| 2018 | | | 31,431 | |
| Thereafter | | | 2,626 | |
| Operating Lease Payable | | $ | 147,456 | |
The Company previously leased an office facility under a noncancelable operating lease, which had an expiration date of December 31, 2013, with $3500.00 due monthly until expiration.
Legal
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may face various claims brought by third parties and the Company may, from time to time, make claims or take legal actions to assert the Company’s rights, including intellectual property rights, contractual disputes and other commercial disputes. Any of these claims could subject the Company to litigation. Management believes the outcomes of currently pending claims will not likely have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Indemnities and Guarantees
In addition to the indemnification provisions contained in the Company’s organization documents, the Company generally enters into separate indemnification agreements with the Company’s directors and officers. These agreements require the Company, among other things, to indemnify the director or officer against specified expenses and liabilities, such as attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlements, paid by the individual in connection with any action, suit or proceeding arising out of the individual’s status or service as the Company’s directors or officers, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct or conduct that is knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest, and to advance expenses incurred by the individual in connection with any proceeding against the individual with respect to which the individual may be entitled to indemnification by the Company. The Company also indemnifies its lessor in connection with its facility lease for certain claims arising from the use of the facility. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Note 13 – Subsequent Event
On July 1, 2014, the Company entered into a Technical Services agreement with two distinct components and scope for a total contracted price of $924,687. The two components are (1) the Company will complete a comprehensive feasibility and financial analysis on the buisness and economic viability of an expanded Caribbean Energy farm for a contracted fee of $367,598, and; (2) the Company will independently develop and operate a certified germplasm nursery over a 12 month period for a contracted fee of $557,089.