UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 20192021
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 001-34506
TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland27-0312904
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
575 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2930Maryland27-0312904
New York,(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
New York(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
10022
1601 Utica Avenue South, Suite 900
St. Louis Park,Minnesota55416
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
(612) 629-2500(612) 453-4100
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class:Trading Symbol(s)Name of Exchange on Which Registered:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per shareTWONew York Stock Exchange
8.125% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockTWO PRANew York Stock Exchange
7.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockTWO PRBNew York Stock Exchange
7.25% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockTWO PRCNew York Stock Exchange
7.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockTWO PRDNew York Stock Exchange
7.50% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockTWO PRENew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No
As of June 30, 2019,2021, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $3.4$2.1 billion based on the closing sale price as reported on the NYSE on that date.
As of February 24, 2020,2022, there were 273,627,275343,920,330 shares of common stock, par value $.01$0.01 per share, issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of registrant’s fiscal year covered by this Annual Report, are incorporated by reference into Part III.






TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
20192021 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS



i




PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview
Our Company
Two Harbors Investment Corp. is a Maryland corporation focused on investing in, financing and managing Agency residential mortgage-backed securities, or Agency RMBS, non-Agency securities, mortgage servicing rights, or MSR, and other financial assets, which we collectively refer to as our target assets. We operate as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, as defined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. The terms “Two Harbors,” “we,” “our,” “us” and the “company” refer to Two Harbors Investment Corp. and its subsidiaries as a consolidated entity.
We were incorporated on May 21, 2009 and commenced operations as a publicly traded company on October 28, 2009, upon completion of a merger with Capitol Acquisition Corp., or Capitol, which became our wholly owned indirect subsidiary as a result of the merger. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol “TWO”.
Our objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted total return to our stockholders over the long term, primarily through dividends and secondarily through capital appreciation. We selectively acquire and manage an investment portfolio of our target assets, which is constructed to generate attractive returns through market cycles. We focus on asset selection and implement a relative value investment approach across various sectors within the mortgage market. Our target assets include the following:
Agency RMBS, meaning RMBS whose principal and interest payments are guaranteed by a U.S. government agency, such as the Government National Mortgage Association (or Ginnie Mae), or a U.S. government sponsored enterprise, or GSE, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (or Fannie Mae), or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (or Freddie Mac);
Non-Agency securities that are not issued or guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac;
MSR; and
Other financial assets comprising approximately 5% to 10% of the portfolio.
We seek to deploy moderate leverage as part of our investment strategy. We generally finance our Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities through short- and long-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, or the FHLB.agreements. We also finance our MSR through repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities, term notes payable and convertible senior notes.
We have elected to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To qualify as a REIT, we are required to meet certain investment and operating tests and annual distribution requirements. We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income to the extent that we annually distribute all of our net taxable income to stockholders, do not participate in prohibited transactions and maintain our intended qualification as a REIT. However, certain activities that we may perform may cause us to earn income which will not be qualifying income for REIT purposes. We have designated certain of our subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, as defined in the Code, to engage in such activities, and we may form additional TRSs in the future. We also operate our business in a manner that will permit us to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act.
Our Manager
We areThrough August 14, 2020, we were externally managed and advised by PRCM Advisers LLC, or PRCM Advisers, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pine River Capital Management L.P, or Pine River. Pine River formed PRCM Advisers for the purpose of providing management services to us. PRCM Advisers is responsible for administering our business activities and day-to-day operations. Pursuant toL.P., under the terms of the management agreementa Management Agreement between us and PRCM Advisers,Advisers. We terminated the Management Agreement effective August 14, 2020 for “cause” in accordance with Section 15(a) thereof. On August 15, 2020, we completed our transition to self-management and directly hired the senior management team and other personnel who had historically provided services to us. In connection with the termination of the Management Agreement, PRCM Advisers provides us with our management team, including our executive officers and support personnel. In addition, PRCM Advisers provides us withfiled a dedicated teamcomplaint in federal court. Refer to Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” of investment professionals and other support. PRCM Advisers is at all times subject to the supervision and oversight of our board of directors. Each of our executive officers is an employee or partner of an affiliate of Pine River; we do not have any employees. We do not pay any of our executive officers cash compensation; rather, we pay PRCM Advisers a base management fee equal to 1.5% per annum of our stockholders’ equity, adjusted to exclude any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income, among other adjustments, as defined by the management agreement. We also reimburse PRCM Advisersthis Annual Report on Form 10-K for the allocable share of the compensation paid by Pine River to its personnel serving as our principal financial officer and general counsel and other reimbursable costs under the management agreement. We do not pay PRCM Advisers any incentive-based fees or other incentive-based compensation.

1




Our dedicated team of investment professionals has broad experience in managing our target assets and has demonstrated the ability to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns under different market conditions and cycles. We have extensive long-term relationships with financial intermediaries, including prime brokers, investment banks, broker-dealers and asset custodians. We believe these relationships enhance our ability to source, finance, protect and hedge our investments and, thus, enable us to succeed in various credit and interest rate environments. We also benefit from our dedicated risk management, accounting, operations, legal, compliance and information technology teams.

1

Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains, or incorporates by reference, not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, and that are subject to the safe harbors created by such sections. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ from our beliefs, expectations, estimates, and projections and, consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements are not historical in nature and can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “target,” “believe,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “goals,” “future,” “likely,” “may,” and similar expressions or their negative forms, or by references to strategy, plans, or intentions. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, those described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors.” Other risks, uncertainties, and factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected are described below and may be described from time to time in reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Important factors, among others, that may affect our actual results include:
changes in interest rates and the market value of our target assets;
changes in prepayment rates of mortgages underlying our target assets;
the occurrence, extent and timing of credit losses within our portfolio;
our exposure to adjustable-rate and negative amortization mortgage loans underlying our target assets;
the state of the credit markets and other general economic conditions, particularly as they affect the price of earning assets, the credit status of borrowers and home prices;
the concentrationongoing impact of the credit risks to which we are exposed;COVID-19 pandemic, and the actions taken by federal and state governmental authorities and GSEs in response, on the U.S. economy, financial markets and our target assets;
legislative and regulatory actions affecting our business;
the availability and cost of our target assets;
the availability and cost of financing for our target assets, including repurchase agreement financing, revolving credit facilities, term notes and convertible notes and financing through notes;
the FHLB;
impact of any increases in payment delinquencies and defaults on the mortgages comprising and underlying our target assets;assets, including additional servicing costs and servicing advance obligations on the MSR assets we own;
changes in liquidity in the market for real estate securities, the re-pricing of credit risk in the capital markets, inaccurate ratings of securities by rating agencies, rating agency downgrades of securities, and increases in the supply of real estate securities available-for-sale;
changes in the values of securities we own and the impact of adjustments reflecting those changes on our consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income (loss) and balance sheets, including our stockholders’ equity;
our ability to generate cash flow from our target assets;
our ability to effectively execute and realize the benefits of strategic transactions and initiatives we have pursued or may in the future pursue;
our decision to terminate our Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers and the ongoing litigation with PRCM Advisers related to such termination;
changes in the competitive landscape within our industry, including changes that may affect our ability to attract and retain personnel;
our exposure to legal and regulatory claims, penalties or enforcement activities, including those related to the termination of our Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers and arising from our ownership and management of MSR and prior securitization transactions;
our exposure to counterparties involved in our MSR business and prior securitization transactions and our ability to enforce representations and warranties made by them;
our ability to acquire MSR and successfully operate our seller-servicer subsidiary and oversee the activities of our subservicers;
our ability to manage various operational and regulatory risks associated with our business;
interruptions in or impairments to our communications and information technology systems;

2




our ability to maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting;
our ability to establish, adjust and maintain appropriate hedges for the risks in our portfolio;
our ability to maintain our REIT qualification for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and
2

limitations imposed on our business due to our REIT status and our status as exempt from registration under the 1940 Act.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain statistics and other data that, in some cases, have been obtained or compiled from information made available by mortgage loan servicers and other third-party service providers.

Our Business
Our Investment Strategy
Our investment objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted total return to our stockholders over the long-term, primarily through dividends and secondarily through capital appreciation. We intend to achieve this objective by constructing a well-balanced portfolio consisting of Agency RMBS, non-Agency securities, MSR and other financial assets, with a focus on managing various associated risks, including interest rate, prepayment, credit, mortgage spread and financing risk. The preservation of book value is of paramount importance to our ability to generate total return on an ongoing basis. Consistent with the objective of achieving attractive risk-adjusted total return over various market cycles, we intend to maintain a balanced approach to these various risks.
Our dedicated investment team makes investment decisions based on a rigorous asset selection process that takes into consideration a variety of factors, including expected cash yield, risk-adjusted returns, current and projected credit fundamentals, current and projected macroeconomic considerations, current and projected supply and demand, credit and market risk concentration limits, liquidity, cost of financing and financing availability. It is our intention to select our assets in such a way as to maintain our REIT qualification and our exemption from registration under the 1940 Act.
Our Target Assets
Our portfolio can be categorized into two strategies based on investment characteristics, which embodies our hybrid investment approach. Both strategiesincludes assets that are primarily sensitive to changes in interest rates, prepayments and mortgage spreads, including but not limited to Agency RMBS, MSR and related hedging transactions. These assets have minimal exposure to the underlying credit performance of the investments. Our portfolio is managed by our Co-Chief Investment Officersas a whole and our resources are allocated and financial performance is assessed on a consolidated basis. The categories and their respectiveOur target asset classes are as follows:
Rates Strategy - Includes assets that are primarily sensitive to changes in interest rates, prepayments and mortgage spreads, including but not limited to Agency RMBS, MSR and related hedging transactions. These assets have minimal exposure to the underlying credit performance of the investments.
Agency RMBSAgency RMBS collateralized by fixed rate mortgage loans, adjustable-rate mortgage (or ARM) loans or hybrid mortgage loans, or derivatives thereof, including:
mortgage pass-through certificates;
collateralized mortgage obligations;
uniform mortgage-backed securities;
Freddie Mac gold certificates;
Fannie Mae certificates;
Ginnie Mae certificates;
“to-be-announced” forward contracts, or TBAs, which are pools of mortgages with specific investment terms to be issued by government sponsored entities,Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or GSEs,Freddie Mac at a future date; and
interest-only and inverse interest-only securities.
MSRThe right to control the servicing of residential mortgage loans, receive the servicing income therefrom and the obligation to service the loans in accordance with relevant standards; the actual servicing functions are outsourced to appropriately licensed third-party subservicers, which service the loans in their own names.

3




Credit Strategy - Includes assets that are primarily sensitive to changes in the credit performance of the underlying collateral, including but not limited to non-Agency securities and related hedging transactions. These assets have interest rate and mortgage spread exposure, although such exposures are not viewed to be the main drivers of performance.
Non-Agency securitiesNon-Agency securities collateralized by residential morgtage loans of varying borrower characteristics and payment type.
Non-Agency securities includes both senior and mezzanine securities. Senior refers to non-Agency securities that represent the senior-most tranches (that is, the tranches which have the highest priority claim to cash flows from the related collateral pool) within the securities’ structure. Mezzanine refers to subordinated tranches within the collateral pool. The non-Agency securities we purchase may include investment-grade and non-investment grade classes, including non-rated securities.
Hybrid mortgage loans have terms with interest rates that are fixed for a specified period of time and, thereafter, generally adjust annually to an increment over a specified interest rate index. ARMs refer to hybrid and adjustable-rate mortgage loans which typically have interest rates that adjust annually to an increment over a specified interest rate index.

Other assets may include financial and mortgage-related assets other than theour target assets, in our rates and credit strategies, including previously held commercial real estate assets, residential mortgage loansnon-Agency securities (securities that are not issued or guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac) and certain non-hedging transactions that may produce non-qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income tests.
3

Our Investment Activities
The following is a summary ofHistorically, we viewed our investment activities related to the target assets in two strategies that were based on our core competencies of understanding and managing prepayment and credit risk. Our rates strategy included assets that are primarily sensitive to changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds, specifically Agency RMBS and MSR. Our credit strategies forstrategy included assets that were primarily sensitive to changes in inherent credit risk, including non-Agency securities. In the first quarter of 2020, we experienced unprecedented market conditions as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic, including unusually significant spread widening in both Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities. In response, we focused our efforts on raising excess liquidity and de-risking our portfolio. On March 25, 2020, we sold substantially all of our non-Agency securities in order to eliminate the risks posed by continued margin calls and ongoing funding concerns associated with the significant spread widening on these assets. We also sold approximately one-third of our Agency RMBS in order to reduce risk and raise cash to establish a strong defensive liquidity position to weather potential ongoing economic and market instability. Late in the first quarter of 2020, the U.S. Federal Reserve, or the Fed, committed to unlimited purchases of Agency RMBS. The Fed’s actions were successful in helping to stabilize that market; however, the resulting historic spread tightening in the first half of 2021 made investments in Agency RMBS less attractive. As a result, and in anticipation of an accelerated tapering of Fed purchases, we reduced our aggregate Agency RMBS/TBA position during the year ended December 31, 2019. We believe our2021. In the ordinary course of business, we make investment model allows management todecisions and allocate capital across various sectors withinin accordance with our views on the mortgage market, with a focus on asset selection and the implementation of a relative value investment approach. Our capital allocation decisions factorchanging risk/reward dynamics in the opportunitiesmarket and in the marketplace, the costour portfolio. Going forward, we expect our capital to be fully allocated to our strategy of financingpairing Agency RMBS and the cost of hedging interest rate, prepayment, credit and other portfolio risks. As a result, allocation among our target assets reflects management’s flexible approach to investing in the marketplace.
Rates StrategyMSR.
Our Agency RMBS portfolio is comprised primarily of adjustable rate and fixed rate mortgage-backed securities backed by single-family and multi-family mortgage loans. All of our principal and interest Agency RMBS are Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac mortgage pass-through certificates or collateralized mortgage obligations that carry an implied rating of “AAA,” or Ginnie Mae mortgage pass-through certificates, which are backed by the guarantee of the U.S. government. The majority of these securities consist of whole pools in which we own all of the investment interests in the securities.
One of our wholly owned subsidiaries holds the requisite approvals from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to own and manage MSR, which represent a contractual right to servicecontrol the servicing of a mortgage loan, the obligation to service the loan in accordance with relevant standards and the right to collect a fee for performingthe performance of servicing activities, such as collecting principal and interest from a borrower and distributing those payments to the owner of the loan. We do not directly service the mortgage loans underlying the MSR we acquire; rather, we contract with appropriately licensed third-party subservicers to handle substantially all servicing functions in the name of the subservicer for the loans underlying our MSR.
As the servicer of record, however, we remain accountable to the GSEs for all servicing matters and, accordingly, provide substantial oversight of each of our subservicers. We believe MSR are a natural fit for our portfolio over the long term. Our MSR business leverages our core competencies in prepayment and credit risk analytics and the MSR assets provide a hedgeoffsetting risks to our Agency RMBS, hedging both interest rate and mortgage spread risk. Our goal is
In making our capital allocation decisions, we take into consideration a number of factors, including the opportunities available in the marketplace, the cost and availability of financing, and the cost of hedging interest rate, prepayment, credit and other portfolio risks. We have expertise in mortgage credit and may choose to create long-lasting relationships with high quality originatorsinvest again in both flow and bulk acquisitions of MSR. 
Credit Strategy
Within our non-Agency securities portfolio, we have a substantial emphasis on “legacy” securities, which consist of securities issued prior to 2009, many of which are subprime. We believe these deeply discounted securities can add relative value asthose assets should the economy and housing markets continue to improve, as there remains upside optionality to lower delinquencies, higher recoveries and faster prepays. We also hold “new issue” non-Agency securities, which we believe have enabled us to find attractive returns and further diversify our non-Agency securities portfolio.

4




opportunity arise.
Our Investment Guidelines
Our board of directors has approved the following investment guidelines:
no investment shall be made that would cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
no investment shall be made that would cause us to be regulated as an investment company under the 1940 Act;
we will primarily invest within our target assets, consisting primarily of Agency RMBS, non-Agency securities, residential mortgage loans, MSR and commercial real estate assets, inclusivecertain types of commercial real estate loans, commercial real property, CMBS, commercial corporate debt and loans and other commercial real estate related investments in the U.S;assets; approximately 5% to 10% of our portfolio may include other financial assets; and
until appropriate investments can be identified, we will invest available cash in interest-bearing and short-term investments that are consistent with (i) our intention to qualify as a REIT and (ii) our exemption from investment company status under the 1940 Act.
These investment guidelines may be changed from time to time by our board of directors in its discretion without the approval of our stockholders.
Within the constraints of the foregoing investment guidelines, we have broad authority to select, finance and manage our investment portfolio. As a general matter, our investment strategy is designed to enable us to:
build an investment portfolio consisting of Agency RMBS, non-Agency securities, MSR and other financial assets that will generate attractive returns while having a moderate risk profile;
manage financing, interest, prepayment rate, credit and similar risks;
capitalize on discrepancies in the relative valuations in the mortgage and housing markets; and
provide regular quarterly dividend distributions to stockholders.
4

Within the requirements of the investment guidelines, we make determinations as to the percentage of our assets that will be invested in each of our target assets. Our investment decisions depend on prevailing market conditions and may change over time in response to opportunities available in different interest rate, economic and credit environments. As a result, we cannot predict the percentage of our assets that will be invested in any of our target asset classes at any given time. We believe that the diversification of our portfolio of assets and the flexibility of our strategy, combined with the expertise of our dedicated investment team, will enable us to achieve attractive risk-adjusted total return under a variety of market conditions and economic cycles.
Financing Strategy
We deploy moderate leverage to fund the acquisition of our target assets and increase potential returns to our stockholders. We are not required to maintain any particular leverage ratio. The amount of leverage we deploy for particular investments in our target assets depends upon a variety of factors, including without limitation: general economic, political and financial market conditions; the anticipated liquidity and price volatility of our assets; the gap between the duration of assets and liabilities, including hedges; the availability and cost of financing our assets; our opinion of the credit worthiness of financing counterparties; the health of the U.S. residential mortgage and housing markets; our outlook for the level, slope and volatility of interest rates; the credit quality of the loans underlying our Agency and non-Agency securities;target assets; the rating assigned to securities; and our outlook for asset spreads relative to the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, curve, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, curve, the Overnight Index Swap Rate, or OIS, the U.S. federal funds rate, and other benchmark rate curves.
Our primary financing sources for Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities are repurchase agreements and FHLB advances.agreements. Repurchase agreements are financings pursuant to which one party, the seller/borrower, sells assets to the repurchase agreement counterparty, the buyer/lender, for an agreed price with the obligation to repurchase the assets from the buyer at a future date and at a price higherdifferent than the original purchase price.price, with the difference representing the borrowing rate (typically based on an index plus a spread consistent with those demanded in the market). The amount of financing available under a repurchase agreement is limited to a specified percentage of the estimated market value of the assets. The difference between the sale price and repurchase price is the interest expense of financing under a repurchase agreement. Under repurchase agreement financing arrangements, if the value of the collateral decreases, the buyer could require the seller to provide additional cash collateral to re-establish the ratio of value of the collateral to the amount of borrowing (i.e., a margin call). In the current economic climate, lenders under repurchase agreements generally advance approximately 90% to 97% of the market value of the Agency RMBS financed (a discount from market value, generally referred to as a haircut, of 3% to 10%) and 60% to 80% of the market value of the non-Agency securities financed (i.e., a haircut of 20% to 40%).
To finance MSR assets and related servicing advance obligations, we may enter into repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities and securitization transactions collateralized by the value of the MSR pledged.and/or servicing advances pledged and with borrowing rates typically based on an index plus a spread consistent with those demanded in the market. If the value of our MSR and/or servicing advances pledged as collateral for the agreements decreases, the respective lender could require us to provide additional collateral or cash as collateral to re-establish the ratio of value of the collateral to the amount of the debt outstanding. Due to certain GSE requirements, we may be restricted as to the frequency in which we are able to pledge additional MSR and/or servicing advance collateral to counterparties. As a result, we may choose to over-collateralize certain repurchase agreements and revolving credit facilitiesfinancing arrangements in order to avoid having to provide cash as additional collateral. Lenders generally advance approximately 65% to 70% of the market value of the MSR financed (i.e., a haircut of 30% to 35%) and 80% to 95% of the value of servicing advances financed (i.e., a haircut of 5% to 20%), depending on the type of advance (corporate, escrow, etc.).

5




During the second quarter ofyear ended December 31, 2019, we formed a new trust entity, or the MSR Issuer Trust, for the purpose of financing MSR through securitization. On June 27, 2019, we, through the MSR Issuer Trust, completed an MSR securitization transaction pursuant to which, through two of our wholly owned subsidiaries, MSR is pledged to the MSR Issuer Trust and in return, the MSR Issuer Trust issued (i) an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million in term notes to qualified institutional buyers and (ii) a variable funding note, or VFN, with a maximum principal balance of $1.0 billion to one of the subsidiaries, in each case secured on a pari passu basis. The term notes bear interest at a rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 2.80% per annum. The term notes will mature on June 25, 2024 or, if extended pursuant to the terms of the related indenture supplement, June 25, 2026 (unless earlier redeemed in accordance with their terms). In connection with the transaction, we also entered into a repurchase facility that is secured by the VFN issued in connection with the MSR securitization transaction, which is collateralized by our MSR.
A significant decrease in the advance rate or an increase in the haircut could result in us having to sell assets in order to meet additional margin requirements by the lender. We expect to mitigate our risk of margin calls under financing arrangements by deploying leverage at an amount that is below what could be used under current advance rates.
In order to reduce our exposure to risks associated with lender counterparty concentration, we generally seek to diversify our exposure by entering into repurchase agreements with multiple counterparties. At December 31, 2019,2021, we had $29.1$7.7 billion of outstanding balances under repurchase agreements with 2420 counterparties, with a maximum net exposure (the difference between the amount loaned to us, including interest payable, and the value of the assets pledged by us as collateral, including accrued interest receivable on such assets) to any single lender of $310.1$354.0 million, or 6.2%12.9% of stockholders’ equity.
Our wholly owned subsidiary, TH Insurance Holdings Company LLC, or TH Insurance, is a member
5

Table of the FHLB. As a member of the FHLB, TH Insurance currently has access to a variety of products and services offered by the FHLB, including secured advances. Eligible collateral may include conventional 1-4 family residential loans, commercial real estate loans, Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities with a rating of A and above.
In January 2016, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA, released a final rule regarding membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank system. Among other effects, the ruling excludes captive insurers from membership eligibility, including our subsidiary member, TH Insurance. Since TH Insurance was admitted as a member in 2013, it is eligible for a membership grace period that runs through February 19, 2021, during which new advances or renewals that mature beyond the grace period will be prohibited. However, any existing advances that mature beyond this grace period will be permitted to remain in place subject to their terms insofar as we maintain good standing with the FHLB. If any new advances or renewals occur, TH Insurance’s outstanding advances will be limited to 40% of its total assets.
Interest Rate Hedging and Risk Management Strategy
We may enter into a variety of derivative and non-derivative instruments to economically hedge interest rate risk or “duration mismatch (or gap)” by adjusting the duration of our floating-rate borrowings into fixed-rate borrowings to more closely match the duration of our assets. This particularly applies to borrowing agreements with maturities or interest rate resets of less than six months. Typically, the interest receivable terms (i.e., LIBOR)LIBOR, OIS or SOFR) of certain derivatives match the terms of the underlying debt, resulting in an effective conversion of the rate of the related borrowing agreement from floating to fixed. The objective is to manage the cash flows associated with current and anticipated interest payments on borrowings, as well as the ability to roll or refinance borrowings at the desired amount by adjusting the duration. To help manage the adverse impact of interest rate changes on the value of our portfolio as well as our cash flows, we may, at times, enter into various forward contracts, including short securities, Agency to-be-announced securities, or TBAs, options, futures, swaps, caps, credit default swaps and total return swaps. In executing on the company’sour current interest rate risk management strategy, the company haswe have entered into TBAs, put and call options for TBAs, interest rate swap cap and swaption agreements and U.S. Treasury futures and Markit IOS total return swaps.Eurodollar futures. In addition, because MSR are negative duration assets, they provide a hedge to interest rate exposure on our Agency RMBS portfolio. In hedging interest rate risk, we seek to reduce the risk of losses on the value of our investments that may result from changes in interest rates in the broader markets, improve risk-adjusted returns and, where possible, obtain a favorable spread between the yield on our assets and the cost of our financing.
Management AgreementHuman Capital
PursuantWe believe that our people are the foundation of our success. We are committed to attracting and retaining the management agreement between usindustry’s top talent by providing competitive wages and PRCM Advisers, PRCM Advisers providesbenefits and cultivating a dedicated team of investment and management professionals to carry out our business strategy as well as operational and administrative infrastructure to support our operations, subject to ongoing oversight by our board of directors. PRCM Advisers is responsible for, among other duties, (i) performingworkplace environment in which all of our day-to-day functions; (ii) determining investment criteriaemployees can thrive and contribute. As of December 31, 2021, we had 105 full time equivalent employees based out of our two office locations in conjunctionMinneapolis, Minnesota and New York, New York.
Compensation and Benefits. We use market data to benchmark and guide our compensation practices to ensure that our compensation program is competitive and rewarding, while at the same time aligning the interests of our employees with those of our boardstockholders. In addition to competitive wages and salaries, our compensation programs include cash bonus and equity incentive compensation opportunities, a 401(k) plan and profit sharing contribution, employer-paid health benefits, health savings and dependent care flexible spending accounts, generous paid time off, short- and long-term disability insurance, a variety of directors; (iii) sourcing, analyzingpersonal and executing investments, asset salesfamily leave options, life-planning financial and financings;legal resources, and (iv) performing assetother voluntary supplemental benefits.
Professional Development. We encourage the professional development of our people through regular leadership development training, talent management, duties. Our boardand tuition reimbursement programs. We also offer a wide variety of directors is responsibleeducational opportunities through our educational platforms, Two Harbors University and a learning management system. We encourage collaboration and teamwork to ensure mutual understanding of responsibilities, priorities and expectations. We thoughtfully plan for our collective success by aligning individual employee and company goals.
Health, Safety and Well-being. We sponsor a number of programs and events that emphasize the oversighthealth and reviewwell-being of PRCM Advisers performance underour employees, including relational, financial, emotional and physical. We promote a culture of health and well-being through employee assistance program services, comprehensive health care benefits and resources for preventative health, such as flu shot clinics and reduced-fee health club memberships. Throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have put the health and safety of our employees and their families first, initially supporting comprehensive work-from-home policies and subsequently implementing a work-life integration and flexibility policy after our return to the office in-person. In addition, we established enhanced safety measures and precautions in both of our offices as recommended by the federal, state and our local agencies.
Workplace Culture. We strive to foster a workplace culture where every individual on our team brings their unique perspectives, abilities and experiences which contribute to driving our organizational value. We are committed to supporting the engagement and leadership of women (who comprise 50% of our senior management agreement.team and approximately 40% of our workforce) and providing opportunities for collaboration, development and career growth. We conduct an annual pulse survey which provides valuable insights from employees on topics involving culture, diversity and inclusion, education, benefits and engagement, and pride ourselves on having a strong participation rate. We also offer a flexible work environment, providing employees the opportunity to balance their professional obligations with that of their personal.

Charitable Partnerships. We are committed to strengthening our local communities through the support of charitable organizations allied with the housing sector, and in particular those that provide housing support to families and children in need. Examples of our support include partnerships with AEON, Simpson Housing and Habitat for Humanity. In addition, we match dollar-for-dollar the cash donations made by our employees to our charitable partnerships.
6


The current term of the management agreement expires on October 28, 2020, and will continue to automatically renew thereafter for successive one-year terms unless terminated in accordance with the agreement. The company may elect not to renew the management agreement upon a determination by at least two-thirds of the independent directors, or the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock (other than those shares held by Pine River or its affiliates), that (i) there has been unsatisfactory performance by PRCM Advisers that is materially detrimental to the company or (ii) the compensation payable to PRCM Advisers is unfair; provided, however, that we shall not have the right to terminate the agreement under clause (ii) if PRCM Advisers agrees to continue to provide the services under the agreement at a reduced fee that at least two-thirds of the independent directors determines to be fair. If we elect not to renew the management agreement pursuant to clauses (i) or (ii) above, notice of termination must be delivered to PRCM Advisers not less than 180 days prior to the expiration of the then existing term, and such notice shall designate an effective termination date that is not less than 180 days from the notice date. Upon the effectiveness of such a termination, we are required to pay a termination fee, or Termination Fee, equal to three times the sum of the average annual base management fee earned by PRCM Advisers during the 24-month period immediately preceding the date of termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the effective termination date. We may also terminate the management agreement for cause, as such term is defined in the management agreement, without payment of any Termination Fee. Notice of termination for cause must be delivered not less than 30 days prior to the effective termination date.
PRCM Advisers may terminate the management agreement if we become required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act, with such termination deemed to occur immediately before such event, and may also decline to renew the management agreement by providing us notice not less than 180 days prior to the expiration of the then existing term; in either case, we would not be required to pay the Termination Fee. PRCM Advisors may also terminate the management agreement for cause upon 60 days’ prior notice upon our material breach of the agreement; in such case, we are required to pay the Termination Fee.
Base Management Fee
The base management fee paid to PRCM Advisers is 1.5% of our stockholders’ equity per annum, calculated and payable quarterly in arrears.
For purposes of calculating the management fee, our stockholders’ equity means the sum of the net proceeds from all issuances of our equity securities since inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus our retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods), less the consolidated stockholders’ equity of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc., or Granite Point, during the time Granite Point was consolidated on our balance sheet (i.e. prior to spin off in 2017) the weighted average cost basis of Granite Point common stock purchased, the outstanding principal balance of the promissory note due from the sale of Granite Point preferred stock and any amount that we have paid for repurchases of our common stock since inception, and excluding any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income (regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income).
In connection with the acquisition of CYS Investments, Inc., or CYS, effective July 31, 2018, the management agreement was amended to (i) reduce the base management fee with respect to the additional equity under management resulting from the merger to 0.75% per annum from the effective time through the first anniversary of the effective time and (ii) for the fiscal quarter in which closing of the merger occurred, to make a one-time downward adjustment of the base management fee for such quarter by $15.0 million and (iii) for the quarter in which the closing of the merger occurred, to make an additional downward adjustment of up to $3.3 million for certain transaction-related expenses.
The resulting amount of stockholders’ equity to be used in the calculation of the base management fee will be adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, and certain non-cash items after discussions between PRCM Advisers and our independent directors and approval by a majority of our independent directors. To the extent asset impairments reduce our retained earnings at the end of any completed calendar quarter it will reduce the base management fee for such quarter. Our stockholders’ equity for the purposes of calculating the base management fee could be greater than the amount of stockholders’ equity shown on the consolidated financial statements.
Expense Reimbursement
We reimburse PRCM Advisers for (i) our allocable share of the compensation paid by Pine River to its personnel serving as our principal financial officer and general counsel as well as personnel employed by Pine River as in-house legal, tax, accounting, consulting, auditing, administrative, information technology, valuation, computer programming and development, and other back-office resources to us and (ii) any amounts for personnel of Pine River’s affiliates arising under a shared facilities and services agreement. We also have certain costs allocated to us by PRCM Advisers for data services and technology, but most direct expenses with third-party vendors are paid directly by us.

7




Operating and Regulatory Structure
Our business is subject to extensive regulation by U.S. federal and state governmental authorities, and self-regulatory organizations. We are required to comply with numerous federal and state laws, including those described below. The laws, rules and regulations comprising this regulatory framework change frequently, as can the interpretation and enforcement of existing laws, rules and regulations. Some of the laws, rules and regulations to which we are subject are intended primarily to safeguard and protect consumers, rather than stockholders or creditors. From time to time, we may receive requests from U.S. federal and state agencies for records, documents and information regarding our policies, procedures and practices regarding our business activities. We incur significant ongoing costs to comply with these regulations.
REIT Qualification
We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code, commencing with our taxable period ended December 31, 2009. Our qualification as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet on a continuing basis, through actual investment and operating results, various complex requirements under the Code relating to, among other things, the sources of our gross income, the composition and value of our assets, our distribution levels and the diversity of ownership of our shares. We believe that we are organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, and we conduct our operations in a manner which will enable us to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT. Certain activities that we may perform may cause us to earn income that will not be qualifying income for REIT purposes. We have designated certain of our subsidiaries as TRSs to engage in such activities, and we may in the future form additional TRSs.
As long as we continue to qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the REIT taxable income we distribute currently to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable years following the year during which we lost our REIT qualification. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income or property.
Investment Company Act of 1940
We conduct our operations so that we are not required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act. If we were to fall within the definition of an investment company, we would be unable to conduct our business as described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act defines an investment company as any issuer that “is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities.” Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act also defines an investment company as any issuer that “is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.” Excluded from the term “investment securities,” among other things, are U.S. government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exclusion from the definition of investment company set forth in Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act.
We are organized as a holding company that conducts business primarily through our subsidiaries. Any business conducted through our subsidiaries will be conducted in such a manner as to ensure that we do not meet the definition of “investment company” because less than 40% of the value of our total assets on an unconsolidated basis would consist of “investment securities.”
To avoid registration as an investment company, certain of our subsidiaries rely on certain exemptions from the 1940 Act, including Section 3(c)(5)(C), which exempts entities that are “primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.” Under the SEC staff’s current guidance, to qualify for this exemption, we must maintain (i) at least 55% of our assets in qualifying interests (referred to as the 55% Test) and (ii) at least 80% of our assets in qualifying interest plus other real estate related assets (referred to as the 80% Test). Qualifying interests for this purpose include mortgage loans and other assets, such as whole pool Agency and non-Agency RMBS, which are considered the functional equivalent of mortgage loans for the purposes of the 1940 Act. We expect each of our subsidiaries relyingthat may rely on Section 3(c)(5)(C) to invest at least 55% of its assets in qualifying interests in accordance with SEC staff guidance, and an additional 25% of its assets in either qualifying interests or other types of real estate related assets that do not constitute qualifying interests. We believe that we conduct our business so that we are exempt from the 1940 Act under Section 3(c)(5)(C), but rapid changes in the values of our assets could disrupt prior efforts to conduct our business to meet the 55% Test and the 80% Test. Our efforts to comply with the 55% Test and the 80% Test could require us to acquire or dispose of certain assets at unfavorable prices and limit our ability to pursue certain investment opportunities.
7

Mortgage Industry Regulation
Although we do not originate or service residential mortgage loans, we must comply with various federal and state laws, rules and regulations as a result of owning MSR. These rules generally focus on consumer protection and include, among others, rules promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, and

8




the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999, or the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. We are also required to maintain qualifications, registrations and licenses in certain states in order to own certain of our assets. These requirements can and do change as statutes and regulations are enacted, promulgated or amended, or as regulatory guidance or interpretations evolve or change, and the trend in recent years among federal and state lawmakers and regulators has been toward increasing laws, regulations and investigative proceedings in relation to the mortgage industry generally.
The Dodd-Frank Act significantly changed the regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry, including the mortgage industry. The Dodd-Frank Act tasked many agencies with issuing a variety of new regulations, including rules related to mortgage origination, mortgage servicing, securitization transactions and derivatives. The Dodd-Frank Act also created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or the CFPB, which has broad rulemaking authority with respect to many of the federal consumer protection laws applicable to the mortgage industry. In addition to its rulemaking authority, the CFPB has supervision, examination and enforcement authority over consumer financial products and services by certain non-depository institutions, including our company. The CFPB has issued a series of rules and related guidance as part of ongoing efforts to effect reformsenhance consumer protections and create uniform standards for the mortgage lending and servicing industries. These mortgage lending rules include requirements addressing how lenders must evaluate a consumer’s ability to repay a mortgage loan, and what specific disclosures and communications that must be made to consumers at various stages in the mortgage lending process.and servicing processes, and specific actions servicers must take at various stages in a loan’s life cycle, including providing assistance to consumers who encounter financial hardship and struggle to make their mortgage payment. These rules have led to increased costs to originate and service loans across the mortgage industry, and given their complexity, it is anticipated thegreater regulatory scrutiny of originators, servicers and other mortgage industry participants will be exposed to greater regulatory scrutiny from federal and state regulators and increased litigation and complaints against these participants from both consumers and government officials.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act imposes obligations on us to safeguard the information we maintain on mortgage loan borrowers requiresand imposes restrictions on our ability to share that we provide mortgage borrowers with notices describing how we collect, use and share their personal information, and allows mortgage borrowers to “opt-out” of sharing certain information with third parties and affiliates. In addition, certaina growing number of states have passed a variety ofor enhanced laws to further protect borrower information, including laws that regulate the use and storage of personally identifiable information, require notifications to borrowers if the security of their personal information is breached, or require us to encrypt personal information when it is transmitted and stored electronically. These evolving federal and state laws require the ongoing review and changes toof our operations, increasedincrease our compliance costs, and affect our ability to use and share information with third parties.parties as part of our business.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or the CARES Act, has provided billions of dollars of relief to individuals, businesses, state and local governments, and the health care system suffering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including mortgage loan forbearance and modification programs to qualifying borrowers who have difficulty making their loan payments. The CARES Act provides up to 360 days of forbearance relief from mortgage loan payments for borrowers with federally backed (e.g., Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac) mortgages who experience financial hardship related to the pandemic. Additionally, foreclosure moratorium and forbearance periods were extended for borrowers with Fannie Mae- or Freddie Mac-backed mortgages by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA, as well as for borrowers with Federal Housing Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture or U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs mortgages. The CARES Act and related federal and state regulation impact MSR owners, like us, that are required for certain MSR assets to advance principal, interest, taxes and insurance payments during all or some of the time when borrowers are in forbearance or while foreclosure moratorium is in effect and to adhere to additional servicing requirements designed to assist impacted borrowers, including, but not limited to, additional borrower outreach, adjusting credit reporting protocols for loans in forbearance, suspending late fees and ceasing foreclosure and eviction activity. A significant number of borrowers, who were previously eligible for forbearance plan extensions, have reached or are reaching their terminal forbearance plan expiration. This has led to improvement in actual and projected forbearance rates; however, over time, delinquencies and defaults in our MSR portfolio could increase if borrowers who were in forbearance are unable to resume making their monthly mortgage payments.
We have implemented and will continue to implement policies and procedures in order to ensure ongoing compliance with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to our business. We have incurred and expect to incur ongoing operational costs to comply with such laws, rules and regulations.
8

Competition
Our netcomprehensive income depends, in large part, on our ability to acquire assets at favorable spreads over our borrowing costs. In acquiring our target assets, we compete with other REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, financial institutions, governmental agencies, mortgage loan servicers, asset management firms and other entities. Some of these entities may not be subject to the same regulatory constraints that we are (i.e.e.g., REIT compliance or maintaining an exemption under the 1940 Act). Many of our competitors are significantly larger than us, have access to greater capital and other resources and may have other advantages over us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish different counterparty relationships than us. Further, we may from time to time face competition from government agencies, such as the Federal Reserve, in connection with initiatives designed to stimulate the U.S. economy or the mortgage market. Market conditions may from time to time attract more competitors for certain of our target assets, which will not only affect the supply of assets but may also increase the competition for sources of financing for these assets. An increase in the competition for sources of funding could adversely affect the availability and cost of financing, and thereby adversely affect our financial results.
Available Information
Our website can be found at www.twoharborsinvestment.com. We make available, free of charge on our website, (on the Investor Relations page under “SEC Filings”), our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as are filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as well as our proxy statement with respect to our annual meeting of stockholders, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our Exchange Act reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC are also available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The content of any website referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K unless expressly noted.
We also make available, free of charge, the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Risk Oversight Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Whistleblowing Procedures and Stockholder CommunicationCommunications Policy. Within the time period required by the SEC and the NYSE, we will post on our website any amendment to the Code of Ethics and any waiver applicable to any executive officer, director or senior officer (as defined in the Code of Ethics).

9




Our Investor Relations Department can be contacted at:
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
Attn: Investor Relations
575 Lexington Avenue,1601 Utica Ave. S., Suite 2930900
New York, NY 10022St. Louis Park, MN 55416
(612) 629-2500453-4100
investorrelations@twoharborsinvestment.cominvestors@twoharborsinvestment.com

Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following is a summary of the significant risk factors known to us that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition to understanding the key risks described below, investors should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all risk factors and, consequently, the following is not a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties.
Risks Related to Our Business and Operations
The value of your investment is subject to the significant risks affecting our business described below. If any of the events described below occur, our business, financial condition, liquidity and/or results of operations could be adversely affected in a material way.
Difficult conditions in the residential mortgage and real estate markets, the financial markets and the economy generally may adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the residential mortgage and real estate markets, the financial markets and the economy generally. In past years, concerns about the mortgage market, declines in home prices, increases in home foreclosures, highCOVID-19 pandemic, unemployment, the availability and cost of credit, and rising government debt levels, as well as inflation, energy costs, global supply chain disruptions, climate change, global economic lethargy, geopolitical unrest across various regions worldwide, European sovereign debt issues, U.S. budget debates, federal government shutdowns and international trade disputes, have from time to time contributed to increased volatility and uncertainty in the economy and financial markets. More recently, home prices increased modestly in 2019 and are expected to gradually appreciate over the next several years. Credit standards in the mortgage market have eased in recent years, though the availability of credit remains well below levels prior to the 2008 financial crisis. Employment market conditions remain solid as jobless claims, unemployment and payroll data continue to show improvement at this state of the business cycle, although new job creation has yet to generate meaningful wage growth. Adverse developments with respect to any of these market conditions may have an impact on new demand for homes, which may compress the home ownership rates and weigh heavily on future home price performance. There is a strong correlation between home price growth rates (or losses) and mortgage loan delinquencies. Any stagnation in or deterioration of the residential mortgage or real estate markets may limit our ability to acquire our target assets on attractive terms or cause us to experience losses related to our assets. Declines in the market values
9

The COVID-19 pandemic and government actions to mitigate its spread and economic impact could have a material adverse effect on our investments may adversely affect ourbusiness, results of operations and credit availabilityfinancial condition.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruptions to the U.S. and global economies and has contributed to volatility and negative pressure in financial markets. The impact of the pandemic and measures by governments and other authorities around the world to prevent its spread have negatively impacted and could further negatively impact our business. In March 2020, we sold substantially all of our non-Agency securities and approximately one-third of our Agency RMBS in order to reduce risk and raise cash to establish a strong defensive liquidity position to weather pandemic-driven economic and market instability. In addition, the economic impacts of the pandemic resulted in elevated delinquency levels among mortgage loan borrowers during 2020. While financial markets and mortgage delinquency levels have largely recovered to pre-pandemic levels, the losses incurred in connection with our non-Agency portfolio in 2020 are expected to have a long-term impact on our book value. It is possible that, in the event pandemic conditions worsen, mortgage loan borrower delinquency levels could again rise, adversely impacting the value of our RMBS and MSR assets and increasing the cost which may reduce earnings and, in turn, cash available for distribution to service our stockholders.MSR assets.
Actions ofIn response to the pandemic, the U.S. government includinghas taken various actions to support the U.S. Congress, U.S. Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasuryeconomy and other governmental and regulatory bodies, to stabilize or reform the financial markets may not achieve their intended effects and may adversely affect our business.
The U.S. government, including the U.S. Congress, U.S. Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasury and other governmental and regulatory bodies have from time to time taken actions designed to stabilize and reformcontinued functioning of the financial markets. In recent years, these activities have included2020, the Federal Reserve providing liquiditycommitted to purchase unlimited amounts of U.S. Treasuries and Agency RMBS. The Federal Reserve’s actions were successful in stabilizing the Agency RMBS market; however, the resulting historic spread tightening in the first half of 2021 made investments in Agency RMBS less attractive. As a result, and in anticipation of an accelerated tapering of purchases by the Federal Reserve, we reduced our aggregate Agency RMBS/TBA position during the year. The Federal Reserve has since announced and initiated the tapering of its asset purchases, which are expected to cease by March 2022. Given the scale of the Federal Reserve’s asset purchases, the effects of its involvement in the Agency mortgage market, including the reduction in the asset purchases, reinvestment rate or outright sales, may be difficult to predict and could adversely affect our financial position.
In addition, the CARES Act provided billions of dollars of relief to individuals, businesses, state and local governments, and the health care system suffering the impact of the pandemic, including mortgage loan forbearance and modification programs to qualifying borrowers who have difficulty making their loan payments. The CARES Act and other executive, legislative and regulatory actions taken in response to the overnight lending market as well as purchasing Treasurypandemic have created new and mortgage bonds in connection with its quantitative easing programs.complex servicing compliance obligations impacting both our business and the businesses of our subservicers. There can be no assurance as to how, in the long term, these or any future actions by the U.S. government will impactaffect our business or the efficiency, liquidity and stability of the financial and mortgage markets or U.S. financial markets. To the extent the mortgage or financial markets do not respond favorably to any of these actions or such actions do not function as intended, our business may be harmed. In addition, because the programs may be designed, in part, to improve the markets for certain of our target assets, the establishment of these programs may result in increased competition to acquire our target assets or, in the case of government-backed mortgage refinancing and modification programs, may have the effect of reducing the revenues associated with certain of our target assets. We cannot predict whether or when additional government actions or initiatives may occur or the potential impact to our business, operations and financial condition.
Our business model depends in part upon the continuing viability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or similar institutions, and any significant changes to their structure or creditworthiness could have an adverse impact on us.
We purchase Agency RMBS that are protected from the risk of default on the underlying mortgages by guarantees from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or, in the case of the Ginnie Mae securities, the U.S. government. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have from time to time reported substantial losses and a need for significant amounts of additional capital. In 2008, in response to the deteriorating financial condition of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the U.S. government and U.S. Treasury undertook a series of

10




actions designed to stabilize these GSEs, including placing them into a federal conservatorship, under which the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA, operates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.conservatorship. In December 2009, the U.S. government committed virtually unlimited capital to ensure the continued existence of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Despite projections that the U.S. Treasury will continue to provide financing, thereThere is no assurance that such capital will continue to be available or that the GSEs will honor their guarantees or other obligations. If these GSEs fail to honor their guarantees, the value of any Agency RMBS guaranteed by the GSEs that we hold would decline.
The continued flow of residential mortgage-backed securities from the GSEs is essential to the operation of the mortgage markets in their current form, and crucial to our business model. InA number of legislative proposals have been introduced in recent years that would phase out or reform the wakeGSEs. It is not possible to predict the scope and nature of the 2008 Financial Crisis, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac became the dominant, and in some cases, the only source of mortgage financing inactions that the U.S. government will ultimately take with respect to the GSEs. Although any phase out or reform would be expected tolikely take several years to implement, if the structure of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac were altered, or if they were eliminated altogether, the amount and type of Agency RMBS and other mortgage-related assets available for investment would be significantly affected. A reduction in supply of Agency RMBS and other mortgage-related assets would result in increased competition for those assets and likely lead to a significant increase in the price we would have to pay for suchour target assets.
A number of legislative proposals have been introduced in recent years that would phase out or reform the GSEs. In 2019, the FHFA for the first time released formal objectives calling for the return of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the private sector. It was also announced during the year that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be permitted to retain a combined $45 billion worth of earnings (Fannie Mae will be allowed to retain $25 billion and Freddie Mac $20 billion). This is a modification of the so-called “net worth sweep” provision that has required Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to deliver nearly all of their profits to the Treasury; the result being that each organization will have the opportunity to build its net worth. It is not possible to predict the scope and nature of the actions that the U.S. government will ultimately take with respect to the GSEs. As a result, Additionally, market uncertainty with respect to the treatment of the GSEs, including that which may be created by proposed legislation or the eventual adoption of laws affecting the GSEs could have the effect of reducing the actual or perceived quality of, and therefore the market value for, the Agency RMBS that we currently hold in our portfolio. Moreover, if the guarantee obligations of Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae were repudiated by FHFA, payments of principal and/or interest to holders of Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae securities would be reduced in the event of any borrower's late payments or failure to pay, or a servicer's failure to remit, borrower payments to the trust. In that case, trust administration and servicing fees could be paid from mortgage payments prior to distributions to holders of agency securities. Any actual direct compensatory damages owed due to the repudiation of Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae's guarantee obligations may not be sufficient to offset any shortfalls experienced by holders of agency securities.
All of the foregoing could materially adversely affect the availability, pricing, liquidity, market value and financing of our target assets and materially adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state laws and regulations.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and are subject to the rules, regulations, approvals, licensing, reporting and examination requirements of various federal, state and statelocal authorities. Any change in applicable federal, state or statelocal laws, rules and regulations, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, could have a substantial impact on our assets, operating expenses, business strategies and results of operations. Our inability or failure to comply with the rules, regulations or reporting requirements, to obtain or maintain approvals and licenses applicable to our businesses, or to satisfy annual or periodic examinations may impact our ability to do business and expose us to fines, penalties or other claims and, as a result, could harm our business. Additionally, legislation
10

Federal and state regulation of the mortgage industry is complex and constantly evolving, and any further changes to applicable laws and regulations, may be enacted orincluding those adopted in response to the future that could significantly affectCOVID-19 pandemic, may adversely impact our businessbusiness.
Although we do not originate or service residential mortgage loans, we must comply with various federal and operations, which could havestate laws, rules and regulations as a material adverse effect onresult of owning MSR. These rules include, among others, the Dodd-Frank Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the CARES Act. We are also required to maintain qualifications, registrations and licenses in certain states in order to own certain of our financial conditionassets. These requirements can and results of operations.do change as statutes and regulations are enacted, promulgated or amended, or as regulatory guidance or interpretations evolve or change.
The Dodd-Frank Act and regulationsits implementing such legislation have had a substantial impact on the mortgage industry and the MBS markets; these regulations, as well as newother federal and state rules and regulations that govern mortgage servicing, combine to create a complex and constantly evolving regulatory environment, and the failure by us, or our subservicers, to comply with these requirements may result in fines or the suspension or revocation of the qualifications, registrations and licenses necessary to operate as an owner of MSR. New or modified regulations implemented under Dodd-Frank may have an adverse impactat the federal or state level to address concerns on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Act, which changed the regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry, including the mortgage industry. The Dodd-Frank Act tasked many agencies with issuing a variety of new regulations,fronts, including rules relatedimpacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, fair and equitable access to mortgage origination, mortgage servicing, securitization transactionshousing and derivatives. In 2018, President Trump signed into law legislation that rolled back key provisions of the Act, easing mortgage regulations on small-data privacy and medium-sized lenders. It is not possible to predict how additionalsecurity concerns, could increase our operational expenses or otherwise enhance regulatory changes under or the further repeal of any provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will affect our business, and there can be no assurance that new or revised rules and regulations will not have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB, which is responsible for regulating the offering and provision of financial products and services for personal, family and household purposes. In addition to exercising consumer financial protection functions under certain enumerated financial protection statutes, such as the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), the CFPB has broad rule-makingsupervision and enforcement authority to protect consumers from unfair, deceptive or abusive acts and practices. The CFPB has issued a series of rules as part of ongoingefforts. Ongoing efforts to effect reforms and

11




create uniform standards for the mortgage lending and servicing industries. These mortgage lending rules include requirements addressing how lenders must evaluate a consumer’s ability to repay a mortgage loan and what specific disclosures and communications must be made to consumers at various stages in the mortgage lending process.
Mortgage servicing rules promulgated by the CFPB include provisions relating to periodic billing statements and disclosures, responding to borrower inquiries and complaints, maintenance of consumer account records, lender-placed insurance, and adjustable rate mortgage interest rate adjustment notices. Further, the mortgage servicing rules require servicers to, among other things, make good faith early intervention efforts to notify delinquent borrowers of loss mitigation options, to implement specified loss mitigation procedures, and if feasible, exhaust all loss mitigation options before proceeding to foreclosure. They also impact the manner in which servicers are required to communicate with borrowers who are in bankruptcy or have applied for loss mitigation, and also provide additional protections for successors in interest. In addition, in May 2019, the CFPB published proposed regulations to implement the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). Although the FDCPA was passed in 1977, until the Dodd-Frank Act became effective, no federal agency had explicit authority to promulgate regulations under the FDCPA. The proposed regulations are not yet final, however, they are expected to impact mortgage servicers in multiple ways, including by specifying how newer communications technologies such as text, email, voice and chat messages may and may not be used to communicate with consumers, requiring additional disclosures and limiting consumer contact in specific ways.
The foregoing rules have led to or will lead to increased costs to originate and service loans across the mortgage industry, and given their complexity, originators, servicers and other mortgage industry participants have been exposed to greater regulatory scrutiny fromenhance cooperation between federal and state regulators as well ascould also contribute to increased litigation and complaints from consumers and government officials.industry scrutiny.
We have incurred and expect to continue to incur in the future operational and system costs necessary to maintain processes to ensure our compliance with theapplicable rules and regulations applicable to us as well as to monitor compliance by our business partners. Additional rules and regulations implemented by the CFPB and state regulators, as well as any changes to existing rules, as a result of the CFPB’s periodic reassessment of established regulations, could lead to changes in the way we conduct our business and increased costs of compliance, both of which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition.
If we were required to register with the CFTC as a Commodity Pool Operator, it could adversely affect our business model, our financial condition and our results of operations.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC, was given jurisdiction over the regulation of swaps. Under rules implemented by the CFTC, companies that utilize swaps as part of their business model, including many mortgage REITs, are deemed to fall within the statutory definition of Commodity Pool Operator, or CPO, and are required to register with the CFTC as a CPO. On December 7, 2012, the CFTC issued no-action relief that permits a CPO to receive relief from registration requirements if it meets certain criteria. While we believe we meet the criteria for such relief, there can be no assurance that the CFTC will not withdraw the no-action letter in the future or that we will continue to satisfy the criteria to qualify for relief from CPO registration. If we were required to register as a CPO in the future or change our business model to ensure we can continue to satisfy the criteria to qualify for the no-action relief, it could impact our ability to operate our business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.compliance.
We operate in a highly competitive market and we may not be able to compete successfully.
We operate in a highly competitive market. Our profitability depends, in large part, on our ability to acquire a sufficient supply of our target assets at favorable prices. In acquiring assets, we compete with a variety of investors, including other mortgage REITs, specialty finance companies, public and private investment funds, asset managers, commercial and investment banks, broker-dealers, commercial finance and insurance companies, the GSEs, mortgage servicers and other financial institutions. In addition, the Federal Reserve has in the past committed to purchase unlimited amounts of Agency RMBS and other assets in order to stabilize the financial markets. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and may have greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. Certain competitors may also have a broader investment mandate or higher risk tolerance, which may allow them to consider a wider variety of potential investments. Additionally, we may face competition from governmental actions and initiatives designed to stimulate the U.S. economy and mortgage market. Competition for our target assets may lead to the price of such assets increasing and their availability decreasing, which may limit our ability to generate desired returns, reduce our earnings and, in turn, decrease the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Our executive officers and other key employees are critical to our success and the loss of any executive officer or key employee may materially adversely affect our business.
We operate in a highly specialized industry and our success is dependent upon the efforts, experience, diligence, skill, and deep knowledge of our business and historical operations of our executive officers and key employees, as well as their industry knowledge and relationships. The departure of any of our executive officers and/or key employees could have a material adverse effect on our operations and performance.
We may change any of our strategies, policies or procedures without stockholder consent.
We may change any of our strategies, policies or procedures with respect to investments, asset allocation, growth, operations, indebtedness, financing strategy and distributions at any time without the consent of stockholders, which could result in our making investments that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the types of investments described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.stockholders. Changes in strategy could also result in the elimination of certain investments and business activities that we no longer view as attractive or in alignment with our business model. Shifts in strategy may increase our exposure to credit risk, interest rate risk, financing risk, default risk, regulatory risk and real estate market fluctuations. We also cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively execute on or to realize the potential benefits of changes in strategy. Any such

12




changes could adversely affect our financial condition, risk profile, results of operations, the market price of our common stock and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
We have invested in and may in the future invest in a variety of mortgage-related and other financial assets that may or may not be closely related to our current business. Additionally, we may enter other operating businesses that may or may not be closely related to our current business. These new assets or business operations may have new, different or increased risks than what we are currently exposed to in our business and we may not be able to manage these risks successfully. Additionally, when investing in new assets or businesses we will be exposed to the risk that those assets, or income generated by those assets or businesses, will affect our ability to meet the requirements to maintain our REIT status or our status as exempt from registration under the 1940 Act. If we are not able to successfully manage the risks associated with new assets types or businesses, it could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our risk management policies and procedures may not be effective.
We have established and maintain risk management policies and procedures designed to identify, monitor and mitigate financial risks, such as credit risk, interest rate risk, prepayment risk and liquidity risk, as well as operational and compliance risks related to our business, assets and liabilities. These policies and procedures may not sufficiently identify all of the risks to which we are or may become exposed or mitigate the risks we have identified. Any expansion of our business activities may result in our being exposed to risks to which we have not previously been exposed or may increase our exposure to certain types of risks. Alternatively, any narrowing of our business activities may increase the concentration of our exposure to certain types of risk. Any failure to effectively identify and mitigate the risks to which we are exposed could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
11

Maintaining our exemptions from registration as an investment company under the 1940 Act imposes limits on our operations.
We intend to conduct our operations so as not to become required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act. Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Excluded from the term “investment securities,” among other things, are U.S. government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company set forth in Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act.
We are organized as a holding company that conducts its businesses primarily through our subsidiaries. We intend to conduct the operations of Two Harbors and its subsidiaries so that they do not come within the definition of an investment company, either because less than 40% of the value of their total assets on an unconsolidated basis will consist of “investment securities” or because they meet certain other exceptions or exemptions set forth in the 1940 Act based on the nature of their business purpose and activities, such as the Rule 3a-7 structured finance exemption for issuers of asset-backed securities or the Section 3(c)(3) exemption for insurance companies.activities.
Certain of our subsidiaries intend tomay rely upon the exemption set forth in Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the 1940 Act, which is available for entities “primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.” This exemption generally means that at least 55% of each such subsidiary’s portfolio must be comprised of qualifying assets and at least 80% of its portfolio must be comprised of qualifying assets and real estate-related assets under the 1940 Act. Qualifying assets for this purpose include mortgage loans and other assets, such as whole pool Agency and non-Agency RMBS, which are considered the functional equivalent of mortgage loans for the purposes of the 1940 Act. We expect each of our subsidiaries relying on Section 3(c)(5)(C) to invest at least 55% of its assets in whole pool Agency and non-Agency RMBS and other interests in real estate that constitute qualifying assets in accordance with SEC staff guidance and an additional 25% of its assets in either qualifying assets and other types of real estate related assets that do not constitute qualifying assets.
As a result of the foregoing restrictions, we are limited in our ability to make or dispose of certain investments. To the extent the SEC publishes new or different guidance with respect to these matters, we may be required to adjust our strategy accordingly. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make certain investments, which could result in a subsidiary holding assets that we might wish to sell or selling assets that we might wish to hold. Although we monitor the portfolios of our subsidiaries relyingthat may rely on the Section 3(c)(5)(C) exemption periodically, and prior to each acquisition or disposition of assets, there can be no assurance that such subsidiaries will be able to maintain this exemption.
We make the determination as to whether a subsidiary is considered a majority-owned subsidiary. The 1940 Act defines a majority-owned subsidiary of a person as a company 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of which are owned by such person, or by another company which is a majority-owned subsidiary of such person. The 1940 Act further defines voting securities as any security presently entitling the owner or holder thereof to vote for the election of directors of a company. We

13




treat companies in which we own at least a majority of the outstanding voting securities as majority-owned subsidiaries for purposes of the 40% test. We have not requested the SEC staff to approve our treatment of any company as a majority-owned subsidiary and the SEC staff has not done so. If the SEC or its staff were to disagree with our treatment of one or more companies as majority-owned subsidiaries, we may need to adjust our strategy and our assets in order to continue to pass the 40% test. Any such adjustment in our strategy could have a material adverse effect.
Qualification for exemptions from registration under the 1940 Act limits our ability to make certain investments. For example, these restrictions limit the ability of our subsidiaries to invest directly in mortgage-backed securities that represent less than the entire ownership in a pool of mortgage loans, debt and equity tranches of securitizations and certain asset backed securities and real estate companies or in assets not related to real estate.
Loss of our 1940 Act exemptions would adversely affect us, the market price of shares of our common stock and our ability to distribute dividends, and could result in the termination of our management agreement with PRCM Advisers and certain of our financing or other agreements.
As described above, we intend to conduct operations so that we are not required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act. Although we monitor our portfolio and our activities periodically, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our exemption from investment company registration under the 1940 Act. The SEC has previously solicited public comment on a wide range of issues relating to the exemptions set forth in Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the 1940 Act, including what types of assets should be deemed qualifying interests and whether REITs that invest in RMBS should be regulated in a manner similar to investment companies. Although we believe that we are properly relying on Section 3(c)(5)(C) to exempt us from regulation under the 1940 Act,Furthermore, any modifications to the 1940 Act exemption rules or interpretations may require us to change our business and operations in order for us to continue to rely on such exemption. Additionally, any uncertainty regarding our 1940 Act exemption could negatively impact our ability to raise capital, borrow money, or engage in certain other types of business transactions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that the rules, regulations and interpretations governing the exemptions available under the 1940 Act will not change in a manner that adversely affects our operations. If we were no longer able to qualify for exemptions from registration under the 1940 Act, we could be required to restructure our activities or the activities of our subsidiaries, including effecting sales of assets in a manner that, or at a time when, we would not otherwise choose, which could negatively affect the value of our common stock, the sustainability of our business model, and our ability to make distributions. Such sales could occur during adverse market conditions, and we could be forced to accept prices below that which we believe are appropriate. The loss of our 1940 Act exemptions may also result in a default under or permit certain of our counterparties to terminate the many repurchase agreements, financing facilities or other agreements we have in place, including permitting PRCM Advisers to terminate our management agreement. The termination of any of these agreements could result in a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Rapid changes in the values of our assets may make it more difficult for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT or our exemption from the 1940 Act.
If the market value or income potential of our assets declines as a result of increased interest rates, prepayment rates, general market conditions, government actions or other factors, we may need to increase our real estate assets and income or liquidate our non-qualifying assets in order to maintain our REIT qualification or our exemption from the 1940 Act. If the decline in real estate asset values or income occurs quickly, this may be difficult to accomplish. This difficulty may be exacerbated by the illiquid nature of certain assets we own, including MSR. We may have to make decisions that we otherwise would not make absent the REIT and 1940 Act considerations.place.
The lack of liquidity of our assets may adversely affect our business, including our ability to value, finance and sell our assets.
We have and may in the future acquire assets or other instruments with limited or no liquidity, including securities, MSR and other instruments that are not publicly traded. Market conditions could also significantly and negatively affect the liquidity of our assets. It may be difficult or impossible to obtain third-party pricing on such illiquid assets and validating third-party pricing for illiquid assets may be more subjective than more liquid assets. Illiquid assets typically experience greater price volatility, as a ready market may not exist for such assets, and such assets can be more difficult to value.
Any illiquidity in our assets may make it difficult for us to sell such assets if the need or desire arises. Unlike equity securities, bonds or other exchange-traded instruments with highly liquid markets, theThe ability to quickly sell certain of our target assets, such as certain securities and MSR, may be constrained by a number of factors, including a small number of willing buyers, lack of transparency as to current market terms and price, and time delays resulting from the buyer’s desire to conduct due diligence on the assets, negotiation of a purchase and sale agreement, compliance with any applicable contractual or regulatory requirements, and for certain assets like MSR, operational and compliance considerations, including the need for certain approvals from the investor in the underlying mortgage loan (e.g., Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac), all of which can result in a sale process that takes several weeks or months. Moreover, certain of our assets may not be registered under the relevant securities laws, resulting in prohibitions against their transfer, sale, pledge or their disposition except in transactions that are exempt from registration requirements or are otherwise in accordance with such laws.considerations. Consequently, even if we identify a buyer

14




for certain of our securities and MSR, there is no assurance that we would be able to sell such assets in a timely manner if the need or desire arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may be forced to sell our assets at a price that is significantly less than the value at which we previously attributed to such assets.
Assets that are illiquid are typically more difficult and costly to finance. As a result, we may be required to finance the assets at unattractive rates or hold them on our balance sheet without the use of leverage. Assets tend to become less liquid during times of financial stress, which is often the time that liquidity is most needed. To the extent that we use leverage to finance assets that later become illiquid, we may lose that leverage if the financing counterparty determines that the collateral is no longer sufficient to secure the financing, or the counterparty could reduce the amount of money that it is willing to lend against the asset.
The illiquidity
12

We use leverage in executing our business strategy, which may adversely affect the return on our assets and may reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders, as well as increase losses when economic conditions are unfavorable.
We use leverage to finance many of our investments and to enhance our financial returns. Our primary source of leverage is short-term repurchase agreement financing for our Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities. We also use revolving credit facilities, repurchase agreements and term notes payable to finance MSR. Other sources of leverage may include credit facilities (including term loans, revolving facilities and FHLB advances) as well as the public issuance of debt securities.
Through the use of leverage, we may acquire positions with market exposure significantly greater than the amount of capital committed to the transaction. For example, by entering into repurchase agreements with advance rates, or haircut levels, of 5% (which is not an atypical haircut for Agency RMBS), we could leverage capital allocated to Agency RMBS by a ratio of as much as 20 to 1. It is not uncommon for investors in Agency RMBS to obtain leverage equal to ten or more times equity through the use of repurchase agreement financing. Subject to market conditions, we anticipate that we may deploy, on a debt-to-equity basis, up to ten times leverage on our Agency RMBS and up to two times on our non-Agency securities;RMBS; however, there is no specific limit on the amount of leverage that we may use.
Leverage will magnify both the gains and the losses of our positions. Leverage will increase our returns as long as we earn a greater return on investments purchased with borrowed funds than our cost of borrowing such funds. However, if we use leverage to acquire an asset and the value of the asset decreases, the leverage will increase our losses. Even if the asset increases in value, if the asset fails to earn a return that equals or exceeds our cost of borrowing, the leverage will decrease our returns.
We may be required to post large amounts of cash as collateral or margin to secure our leveraged positions.positions, including on our MSR financing facilities. In the event of a sudden, precipitous drop in value of our financed assets, we might not be able to liquidate assets quickly enough to repay our borrowings, further magnifying losses. Even a small decrease in the value of a leveraged asset may require us to post additional margin or cash collateral. This may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and decrease the cash available to us for distributions to stockholders.
We may not be able to raise the capital required to finance our assets and grow our business.
The operation of our business may require access to debt and equity capital that may or may not be available on favorable terms or at the desired times, or at all. In addition, we invest in certain assets, including MSR, for which financing has historically been difficult or costly to obtain and is otherwise subject to the consent of and the terms and conditions required by the GSEs. Any limitation on our ability to obtain financing for our target assets could require us to seek equity or debt capital that may be more costly or unavailable to us. We cannot assure you that we will have access to any debt or equity capital on favorable terms or at the desired times, or at all. Our inability to raise such capital or obtain financing on favorable terms could materially adversely impact our business, operations, financial condition, liquidity, and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
We depend on repurchase agreements and other credit facilities to execute our business plan and any limitation on our ability to access funding through these sources could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and business.
Our ability to purchase and hold assets is affected by our ability to secure repurchase agreements and other credit facilities on acceptable terms. We currently have repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities and other credit facilities in place with severalnumerous counterparties, including national banks and the FHLB. In the future, we may enter into additional or increase commitment amounts under our existing repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities and credit facilities, but we can provide no assurance that lenders will be willing or ablecontinue to provide us with sufficient financing through the repurchase markets or otherwise. In addition, with respect to MSR financing, there can be no assurance that the GSEs will consent to such transactions or consent on terms consistent with prior MSR financing transactions. Because repurchase agreements and similar credit facilities are generally short-term commitments of capital, changes inchanging conditions in the financing markets may make it more difficult for us to secure continued financing during times of market stress. During certain periods of a credit cycle, lenders may lose their ability or curtail their willingness to provide financing. If we are not able to arrange for replacement financing on acceptable terms, or if we default on our covenants or are

15




otherwise unable to access funds under any of our repurchase agreements and credit facilities, we may have to curtail our asset acquisition activities and/or dispose of assets.
Our ability to efficiently access financing through our repurchase agreements or otherwise may be adversely impacted by counterparty requirements regarding the type of assets that may be sold and the timing and process for such sales. In order for us to borrow funds under our repurchase agreements, counterparties must first review the assets for which we are seeking financing and approve such assets in their sole discretion. ThisCounterparty review and approval processprocesses may delay the timing in which funding may be provided, or preclude funding altogether. For MSR, delays may also occur due to the need to obtain GSE approval of the collateral to be posted, the need for third-party valuations of the MSR collateral or the agreement of the relevant servicing partysubservicers to be party to the financing agreement.
It is possible that the lenders that provide us with financing could experience changes in their ability to advance funds to us, independent of our creditworthiness or the value of our assets. For example, the Basel III regulatory capital reform rules or other regulatory changes, may have the effect of significantly changing or eliminating the sources of financing that are customarily available to us. If regulatory requirements imposed on our lenders change, they may be required to significantly increase the cost of the financing that they provide to us or eliminate it altogether. Our lenders also may revise their eligibility requirements for the types of assets they are willing to finance or the terms of such financings, based on, among other factors, the regulatory environment and their management of perceived risk.
In January 2016, the FHFA issued a final rule that excluded captive insurers from ongoing FHLB membership. Our subsidiary, TH Insurance Holdings Company LLC, or TH Insurance, is a licensed captive insurer and has been a member of the FHLB of Des Moines since 2013. Pursuant to the final rule, TH Insurance will be allowed to remain an FHLB member through February 19, 2021. During this grace period, any new advances or renewals that mature beyond the grace period will be prohibited. However, any existing advances that mature beyond this grace period will be permitted to remain in place subject to their terms insofar as TH Insurance maintains good standing with the FHLB. If any new advances or renewals occur, TH Insurance’s outstanding advances will be limited to forty percent of its assets. While our reliance upon the FHLB as a source of financing has diminished in recent years relative to alternative sources of funding, we cannot assure you that, in the future, we will be able to obtain financing on terms similar to the FHLB, if at all, which could have material adverse impact on our business.
Changes in the financing markets could adversely affect the marketability of the assets in which we invest, and this could negatively affect the value of our assets. If our lenders are unwilling or unable to provide us with financing, or if the financing is only available on terms that are uneconomical or otherwise not satisfactory to us, we could be forced to sell assets when prices are depressed. The amount of financing we receive under our repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities or other credit facilities will be directly related to the lenders’ valuation of the assets that secure the outstanding borrowings. Typically, repurchase agreements and similar lending arrangements grant the respective lender the right to reevaluate the market value of the assets that secure outstanding borrowings at any time. If a lender determines that the value of the assets has decreased, it typically has the right to initiate a margin call, requiring us to transfer additional assets to such lender, or repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings. Any such margin call could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, business, liquidity and ability to make distributions to stockholders, and could cause the value of our common stock to decline. We may be forced to sell assets at significantly depressed prices to meet margin calls and to maintain adequate liquidity at levels satisfactory to the counterparty, which could cause us to incur losses. Moreover, to the extent that we are forced to sell assets because of the availability of financing or changes in market conditions, other market participants may face similar pressures, which could exacerbate a difficult market environment and result in significantly greater losses on the sale of such assets. In an extreme case of market duress, a market may not exist for certain of our assets at any price.
Although we generally seek to reduce our exposure to lender concentration-related risk by entering into repurchase agreements and other credit facilitiesfinancing relationships with multiple counterparties, we are not required to observe specific diversification criteria, except as may be set forth in the investment guidelines adopted by our board of directors. To the extent that the number of or net exposure under our lending arrangements may become concentrated with one or more lenders, the adverse impacts of defaults or terminations by such lenders may be significantly greater. As
13

Table of December 31, 2019, lenders for whom our net exposure (generally, the value of assets sold under repurchase agreements or posted as loan collateral, less the amount of the associated liabilities) exceeded 5% of stockholders’ equity included the Royal Bank of Canada. See Note 10 - ContentsRepurchase Agreements and Note 12 - Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines Advances to the consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for additional information.
Our inability to meet certain financial covenants related to our repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities or other credit facilities could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In connection with certain of our repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities and other credit facilities, we are required to comply with certain financial covenants, the most restrictive of which are disclosed within Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Compliance with these financial covenants will depend on market factors and the strength of our business and operating results. Various risks, uncertainties and events beyond our control could affect our ability to comply with the financial covenants. Failure to

16




comply with our financial covenants could result in an event of default, termination of the lending facility, acceleration of all amounts owing under the lending facility, and may give the counterparty the right to exercise certain other remedies under the lending agreement, including without limitation the sale of the asset subject to repurchase at the time of default, unless we were able to negotiate a waiver. Any such waiver could be conditioned on an amendment to the lending agreement and any related guaranty agreement on terms thatIn addition, we may be unfavorablesubject to us. If we are unablecross-default provisions under certain financing facilities that could cause an event of default under such financing facilities to negotiate a covenant waiver or replace or refinance our assetsbe triggered by events of default under a new lending facility on favorable terms or at all, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay dividends could be adversely affected.other financing arrangements.
If a counterparty to a repurchase agreement defaults on its obligation to resell the underlying security back to us at the end of the purchaserepurchase agreement term, or if the value of the underlying asset has declined as of the end of that term, or if we default on our obligations under the repurchase agreement, we may incur losses.
When we enter into repurchase agreements, we sell the assets to lenders (i.e., repurchase agreement counterparties) and receive cash from the lenders. The lenders are obligated to resell the same assets back to us at the end of the term of the repurchase agreement. Because the cash that we receive from the lender when we initially sell the assets to the lender is less than the value of those assets (the difference being the “haircut”), if the lender defaults on its obligation to resell the same assets back to us, we would incur a loss on the repurchase agreement equal to the amount of the haircut (assuming there was no change in the value of the securities). We would also incur losses on a repurchase agreement if the value of the underlying assets has declined as of the end of the repurchase agreement term, because we would have to repurchase the assets for their initial value but would receive assets worth less than that amount. Further, if we default on our obligations under a repurchase agreement, the lender will be able to terminate the repurchase agreement and may cease entering into any other repurchase agreements with us. If a default occurs under any of our repurchase agreements and a lender terminates one or more of its repurchase agreements, we may need to enter into replacement repurchase agreements with different lenders. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in entering into such replacement repurchase agreements on the same terms as the repurchase agreements that were terminated or at all. Any losses that we incur on our repurchase agreements could adversely affect our earnings and thus our cash available for distribution to stockholders.
Our rights under our repurchase agreements are subject to the effects of bankruptcy laws in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of us or our lenders under the repurchase agreements.
In the event of our insolvency or bankruptcy, certain repurchase agreements may qualify for special treatment under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the effect of which, among other things, would be to allow the lender under the applicable repurchase agreement to avoid the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and to foreclose on the collateral agreement without delay. In the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of a lender during the term of a repurchase agreement, the lender may be permitted, under applicable insolvency laws, to repudiate the contract, and our claim against the lender for damages may be treated simply as an unsecured creditor.creditor claim. In addition, if the lender is a broker or dealer subject to the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, or an insured depository institution subject to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, our ability to exercise our rights to recover our assets under a repurchase agreement or to be compensated for any damages resulting from the lender's insolvency may be further limited by those statutes. These claims would be subject to significant delay and, if and when received, may be substantially less than the damages we actually incur.
The impairment or negative performance of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.
We have exposure to and routinely execute transactions with numerous counterparties in the financial services industry, including broker-dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, investment funds and other institutions. The operations of U.S. and global financial services institutions are highly interconnected and a decline in the financial condition of one or more financial services institutions may expose us to credit losses or defaults, limit our access to liquidity or otherwise disrupt the operationsoperation of our businesses. While we regularly assess our exposure to different counterparties, the performance and financial strength of specific institutions are subject to rapid change, the timing and extent of which cannot be known.
Downgrades in the credit or financial strength ratings assigned to the counterparties with whom we transact or other adverse reputational impacts to such counterparties could create the perception that our business or financial condition will be adversely impacted as a result of potential future defaults by such counterparties. Additionally, we could be adversely affected by a general, negative perception of financial institutions caused by the downgrade or other adverse impact to the reputation of other financial institutions. Accordingly, ratings downgrades or other adverse reputational impacts for other financial institutions could adversely affect our business and financial condition and could limit access to or increase our cost of capital.
We may not have the ability to raise funds necessary to pay principal amounts owed upon maturity of our outstanding convertible senior notes or to purchase such notes upon a fundamental change.
In January 2017, weWe have issued through an underwritten public offeringand outstanding $287.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% convertible senior notes due January 2022.2026. To the extent these notes are not converted into common stock by the noteholders prior to their maturity date, we will be obligated to repay the principal amount of all outstanding notes upon maturity. In addition, if a fundamental change occurs (as described in the First Supplemental Indenturesupplemental indenture governing the notes), noteholders have the right to require us to purchase for cash any or all of their notes. The fundamental change purchase price will equal 100% of the principal amount of

17




the notes to be purchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the fundamental change purchase date. We may not have sufficient funds available at the time we are required to repay principal amounts or to purchase the notes upon a fundamental change, and we may not be able to raise additional capital or arrange necessary financing forin order to make such payments on terms that are acceptable terms,to us, if at all. In addition, our ability to purchase the notes may be limited by law, by regulatory authority or by the agreements governing our other indebtedness outstanding at the time. If we fail to pay any amounts associated with the notes when due, we may be in default under the indenture governing the notes. A default under the indenture or a fundamental change itself could also constitute a default under the agreements governing our other existing and future indebtedness, which would further restrict our ability to make required payments under the notes. As a consequence
14

An increase in our borrowing costs relative to the interest that we receive on our leveraged assets may adversely affect our profitability and our cash available for distribution to stockholders.profitability.
As our repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings mature, we must enter into new borrowings, find other sources of liquidity or sell assets. An increase in short-term interest rates at the time that we seek to enter into new borrowings would reduce the spread between the returns on our assets and the cost of our borrowings. This would adversely affect the returns on our assets, which might reduce earnings and, in turn, cash available for distribution to stockholders.
We are highly dependent on information technology, and system failures or security breaches or systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay dividends.business.
Our business is highly dependent on information technology. In the ordinary course of our business, we may store sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and that of our business partners, and personally identifiable information of mortgage borrowers, on our networks. The secure maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations.
Computer malware, viruses, hackingransomware and phishing attacks have become more prevalentremain widespread and sophisticated in recent years and weare increasingly sophisticated. We are from time to time the target of attempted cyber threats. We continuously monitor and develop our information technology networks and infrastructure to prevent, detect, address and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses and other events that could have a security impact. Despite these security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, regulatory penalties, disruptdisruption to our operations, disruptor disruption to our trading activities or damage our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
The resources required to protect our information technology and infrastructure, and to comply with the laws and regulations related to data and privacy protection, are subject to uncertainty. Even in circumstances where we are able to successfully protect such technology and infrastructure from attacks, we may incur significant expenses in connection with our responses to such attacks. In addition, recent well-publicized security breaches have led to enhanced governmentGovernment and regulatory scrutiny of the measures taken by companies to protect against cyber-security attacks and may in the future resulthas resulted in heightened cyber-security requirements and/orand additional regulatory oversight. As cyber-security threats and government and regulatory oversightAny of associated risks continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to enhance or expand upon the security measures we currently maintain. Any such actionsforegoing may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Natural disasters, terrorist attacks, other acts of violence or war, or other unexpected events may affect the value of our investments, the markets in which we operate and our results of operations.
Natural disasters, terrorist attacks, other acts of violence or war, or other unexpected events may negatively affect our operations, the market price of our capital stock and the value of our investments. There can be no assurance that events like these will not occur or have a direct impact on our business. Such events could materially interrupt our business operations, cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the U.S. and worldwide financial markets and economy. They also could result in or prolong an economic recession in the U.S. or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have a significant adverse impact on our operating results and revenues and on the market price of our capital stock and on the value of our investments.
The occurrence of natural disasters, terrorist attacks or a significant adverse climate changes may cause a sudden decrease in the value of real estate in the area or areas affected and would likely reduce the value of the properties securing the mortgages collateralizing our non-Agency securities or underlying our MSR. Because certain natural disasters may not be covered by the standard hazard insurance policies maintained by borrowers (such as hurricanes or certain flooding), or the proceeds payable under any such policy may not be sufficient to cover the related repairs, the affected borrowers may have to pay for any repairs themselves. Under these circumstances, borrowers may decide not to repair their property or may stop paying their mortgages. This would likely cause defaults and credit loss severities to increase and would negatively impact our securities and MSR portfolios.

18




We enter into hedging transactions that expose us to contingent liabilities in the future, which may adversely affect our financial results or cash available for distribution to stockholders.
We engage in transactions intended to hedge against various risks to our portfolio, including the exposure to changes in interest rates. The extent of our hedging activity varies in scope based on, among other things, the level and volatility of interest rates, the type of assets held and other market conditions. Although these transactions are intended to reduce our exposure to various risks, hedging may fail to adequately protect or could adversely affect us because, among other things:
available hedges may not correspond directly with the risks for which protection is sought;
the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related liability;
the amount of income that a REIT may earn from certain hedging transactions (other than through our TRSs) is limited by U.S. federal income tax provisions;
the credit quality of a hedging counterparty may be downgraded to such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction; and
the hedging counterparty may default on its obligations.
Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT and satisfying the criteria for no-action relief from the CFTC’s CPOCommodity Futures Trading Commission’s commodity pool operator registration rules, there are no current limitations on the hedging transactions that we may undertake. Our hedging transactions could require us to fund large cash payments in certain circumstances (e.g., the early termination of the hedging instrument caused by an event of default or other early termination event, or a demand by a counterparty that we make increased margin payments).
Our ability to fund these obligations will depend on the liquidity of our assets and our access to capital at the time. The need to fund these obligations could adversely affect our financial condition. Further, hedging transactions, which are intended to limit losses, may actually result in losses, which would adversely affect our earnings and could in turn reduce cash available for distribution to stockholders.
The Dodd-Frank Act regulates derivative transactions, including certain hedging instruments we use in our risk management activities. Rules implemented by the CFTC pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act require, among other things, that certain derivatives be cleared through a registered clearing facility and traded on a designated exchange or swap execution facility. These regulations could increase the operational and transactional cost of derivatives contracts and affect the number and/or creditworthiness of available counterparties. Furthermore, the enforceability of agreements underlying hedging transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory and commodity and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. The business failure of a hedging counterparty will most likely result in its default. Default by a hedging counterparty may result in the loss of unrealized profits and force us to cover our commitments, if any, at the then current market price. Although generally we seek to reserve the right to terminate our hedging positions, it may not always be possible to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract in order to cover our risk. We cannot assure you that a liquid secondary market will exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may be required to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in losses.
Our financial results may experience greater fluctuations due to our decision not to elect hedge accounting treatment on our derivative instruments.
We have elected to not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815, for our current derivative instruments. The economics of our derivative hedging transactions are not affected by this election; however, our earnings (losses) for U.S. GAAP purposes or GAAP net income (loss), may be subject to greater fluctuations from period to period as a result of this accounting treatment for changes in fair value of derivative instruments or for the accounting of the underlying hedged assets or liabilities in our financial statements, as it does not necessarily align with the accounting used for derivative instruments.
15

We depend on third-party service providers, including mortgage loan servicers, for a variety of services related to our business. We are, therefore, subject to the risks associated with third-party service providers.
We depend on a variety of services provided by third-party service providers related to our investments in Agency RMBS non-Agency securities and MSR, as well as for general operating purposes. For example, we rely on the mortgage servicers who service the mortgage loans underlying our Agency RMBS non-Agency securities and MSR to, among other things, collect principal and interest payments on such mortgage loans and perform loss mitigation services in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Mortgage servicers and other service providers, such as trustees, bond insurance providers, due diligence vendors and document custodians, may fail to perform or otherwise not perform in a manner that promotes our interests.
For example, anyRecent enhancements have been made to legislation or regulationand regulations intended to assist borrowers struggling to continue making their contractual mortgage payments. These requirements may delay, reduce or prevent foreclosures through, among other things, loan modifications and other loss mitigation measures, but they may reduce thealso result in reduced value of the related mortgage loans, including those underlying our Agency RMBS non-Agency securities and MSR. Mortgage servicers may be required or otherwise incentivized by the Federalfederal or state governments to pursue such actions designed to assist mortgagors, such asincluding loan modifications, forbearance plans and other actions intended to prevent foreclosure,

19




even if such loan modifications and otherforeclosure. While these actions are may be beneficial to borrowers, they maynot be in the best interests of the beneficial owners of the mortgage loans. Similarly, legislation delaying the initiation or completion of foreclosure proceedings on specified types of residential mortgage loans or otherwise limiting the ability of mortgage servicers to take actions that may be essential to preserve the value of the mortgage loans may also reduce the value of mortgage loans underlying our Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities. Any such limitations are likely to cause delayed or reduced collections from mortgagors and generally increase servicing costs. As a consequence of the foregoing matters, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
In addition, in connection with our ownership of MSR, we possess personally identifiable information that is shared with third-party service providers, including our mortgage servicers, as required or permitted by law. In the event the information technology networks and infrastructure of our third-party service providers is breached, we may be liable for losses suffered by individuals whose personal information is stolen as a result of such breach and any such liability could be material. Even if we are not liable for such losses, any breach of these third-party systems could expose us to material costs related to notifying affected individuals or other parties and providing credit monitoring services, as well as to regulatory fines or penalties. In addition, any breach of these systems could disrupt our normal business operations and expose us to reputational damage or adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to fines, penalties or other enforcement actions based on the conduct of third-party mortgage loan servicers who service the loans underlying the MSR we acquire or our failure to conduct appropriate oversight of these servicers, which could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and business.servicers.
We contract with third-party mortgage loan servicers to perform the actual day-to-day servicing obligations on the mortgage loans underlying our MSR. We and the mortgage loan servicers operate in a highly regulated industry and are required to comply with various federal, state and local laws and regulations, including the obligation to oversee our third-party mortgage servicers to assess their compliance with these laws and regulations. Although the servicing activity is conducted primarily in the name of the mortgage loan servicers, to the extent these servicers fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could be subject to governmental actions such as denial, suspension or revocation of licenses, be fined or otherwise subject to regulatory enforcement action, or incur losses or be subject to lawsuits, any of which could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. While some of these laws and regulations may not explicitly hold us responsible for the legal violations of third-party servicers, federal and state agencies have increasingly sought to impose such liability. Accordingly, the conduct of third-party mortgage loan servicers or our failure to adequately oversee their compliance with these laws and regulations may subject us to increased regulatory risk and could result in regulatory fines, penalties, civil liabilities or other limitations in our ability to acquire and manage MSR. Further, it is possible that a third-party servicer’s failure to comply with new and evolving servicing rules or standards could adversely affect the value of our MSR.
A failure to protect our reputation could adversely affect our businesses.
Our reputation is critical to the success of our business. Damage to our reputation may arise from numerous sources, including legal or regulatory actions, failing to deliver minimum or required standards of service, compliance failures, perceived or actual weakness in our financial condition, technological or other security breaches or misconduct on the part of our manager or third-party service providers. In addition, adverse developments with respect to our industry generally or with respect to one or more of our competitors may also, by association, negatively impact our reputation. Negative perceptions or publicity regarding the foregoing matters could lead to difficulties in developing and maintaining relationships with our business counterparties, limit the sources of available funding and/or result in additional legal and regulatory scrutiny, all of which could adversely impact our business and results of operations.lawsuits.
Our ability to own and manage MSR is subject to terms and conditions established by the GSEs, which are subject to change.
Our subsidiary’s continued approval from the GSEs to own and manage MSR is subject to compliance with each of their respective selling and servicing guidelines, minimum capital requirements and other conditions they may impose from time to time at their discretion. Failure to meet such guidelines and conditions could result in the unilateral termination of our subsidiary’s approved status by one or more GSEs.GSEs or result in the acceleration and termination of our MSR financing facilities. In addition, the implementation of more restrictive or operationally intensive guidance may increase the costs associated with owning and managing MSR as well as our ability to finance MSR.
GSEs generally require mortgage servicers to be paid a minimum servicing fee for the services provided. Changes in minimum servicing fee amounts for loans purchased or guaranteed by government-related entities could occur at any time and could negatively impact the value of the income derived from MSR on new origination that we may acquire in the future under our flow agreements or through bulk transactions.
We may not be able to acquire MSR.
MSR is a critical component of our overall portfolio management strategy, and our ability to source a sufficient amount of MSR may be adversely impacted for many reasons. We may be unable to locate originators or other sellers that are able or willing to sell MSR that meet our standards or on acceptable terms and conditions. Additionally, competition for MSR may drive down supply or drive up prices, making it uneconomical to purchase. General economic factors, such as recession,

20




declining home values, unemployment and high interest rates, may limit the supply of available MSR. As a result, we may incur additional costs to acquire a sufficient volume of MSR or be unable to acquire MSR at a reasonable price. If we cannot source an adequate volume of MSR on desirable terms, our results of operations may be adversely impacted.
Our securitization activities expose us to risk of litigation, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.
In connection with our securitization transactions, we prepare disclosure documentation, including term sheets and offering memorandums, which contain disclosures regarding the securitization transactions and the assets securitized. If our disclosure documentation is alleged or found to contain inaccuracies or omissions, we may be liable under federal securities laws, state securities laws or other applicable laws for damages to third parties that invest in these securitization transactions, including in circumstances in which we relied on a third party in preparing accurate disclosures, or we may incur other expenses and costs in connection with disputing these allegations or settling claims. We have also sold or contributed residential mortgage loans to third parties who, in turn, securitize those loans. In these circumstances, we may have also prepared disclosure documentation, including documentation that is included in term sheets and offering memorandums relating to those securitization transactions. We could be liable under federal securities laws, state securities laws, or other applicable laws for damages to third parties that invest in these securitization transactions, including liability for disclosures prepared by third parties or with respect to loans that we did not sell or contribute to the securitization.
We may be subject to representation and warranty risk in our capacity as an owner of MSR as well as in connection with our prior securitization transactions and our sales of MSR and other assets.
The MSR we acquire may be subject to existing representations and warranties made to the applicable investor (including, without limitation, the GSEs) regarding, among other things, the origination and prior servicing of those mortgage loans, as well as future servicing practices following our acquisition of such MSR. If such representations and warranties are inaccurate, we may be obligated to repurchase certain mortgage loans or indemnify the applicable investor for any losses suffered as a result of the origination or prior servicing of the mortgage loans, either of which may result in a loss.loans. As such, the applicable investor will have direct recourse to us for such origination and/or prior servicing issues.
16

In connection with our prior securitization transactions and with the sales of our MSR and other assets from time to time, we may have been or may be required to make representations and warranties to the purchasers of the assets regarding certain characteristics of those assets. If our representations and warranties are inaccurate, we may be obligated to repurchase the assets, which may result in a loss. Even if we obtain representations and warranties from the parties from whom we acquired the asset, as applicable, they may not correspond with the representations and warranties we make or may otherwise not protect us from losses. Additionally, the loan originator or other parties from whom we acquired the MSR may be insolvent or otherwise unable to honor their respective indemnification or repurchase obligations for breaches of representation and warranties. For example, if representations and warranties we obtain from those parties do not exactly align with the representations and warranties we make, or if the representations and warranties made to us are not enforceable or if we cannot collect damages for a breach (e.g., due to the financial condition of the party that made the representation or warranty to us or statutes of limitations), we may incur losses.
Risks Related To Our Assets
Declines in the market values of our assets may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
A substantial portion of our assets are classified for accounting purposes as “available-for-sale.” Changes in the market values of those assets will be directly charged or credited to stockholders’ equity. As a result, a decline in values may result in connection with factors that are out of our control and adversely affect our book value. Moreover, if the decline in value of an available-for-sale security is other than temporary, such decline will reduce our earnings.
WeIn addition, some of the assets in our portfolio are not publicly traded. The fair value of securities and other assets that are not publicly traded may not realize gains or income from our assets.
be readily determinable. We seek to generate current incomevalue these assets quarterly at fair value, as determined in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and capital appreciation for our stockholders. However,Disclosures, which may include unobservable inputs. Because such valuations are subjective, the assets that we acquire may not appreciate infair value and, in fact, may decline in value. Additionally, the securities that we acquire, or the loans underlyingof certain of our assets may experience defaultsfluctuate over short periods of interest and/or principal payments, which could result in significant losses related to such assets. Accordingly, wetime and our determinations of fair value may notdiffer materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these securities existed. We may be able to realize gains or income fromadversely affected if our assets. Any gainsdeterminations regarding the fair value of these assets are materially higher than the values that we doultimately realize may not be sufficient to offset other losses that we experience. Any income that we realize may not be sufficient to offset our expenses.

21




Changes in mortgage prepayment rates may adversely affect the value of our assets.
The value of our assets is affected by prepayment rates on mortgage loans, and our investment strategy includes making investments based on our expectations regarding prepayment rates. A prepayment rate is the measurement of how quickly borrowers pay down the unpaid principal balance of their loans or how quickly loans are otherwise brought current, modified, liquidated or charged off.
With respect to our securities portfolio, typically the value of a mortgage-backed security includes market assumptions regarding the speed at which the underlying mortgages will be prepaid. Faster than expected prepayments could adversely affect our profitability, including in the following ways:
We may purchase securities that have a higher interest rate than the market interest rate at the time. In exchange for this higher interest rate, we may pay a premium over the par value to acquire the security. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we may amortize this premium over the estimated term of the security. If the security is prepaid in whole or in part prior to its maturity date, however, we may be required to expense the premium that was prepaid at the time of the prepayment.
A substantial portion of our adjustable-rate Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities may bear interest rates that are lower than their fully indexed rates, which are equivalent to the applicable index rate plus a margin. If an adjustable-rate security is prepaid prior to or soon after the time of adjustment to a fully-indexed rate, we will have held that security while it was least profitable and lost the opportunity to receive interest at the fully indexed rate over the remainder of its expected life.
If we are unable to acquire new Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities similar to the prepaid security, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows wouldcould suffer.
PrepaymentChanges in prepayment rates also significantly affect the value of MSR because such rights are priced on an assumption of a stable repayment rate. If the prepayment rate is significantly greater than expected, the fair value of the MSR could decline and we may be required to record a non-cash charge, which would have a negative impact on our financial results. Furthermore, a significant increase in the prepayment rate could materially reduce the ultimate cash flows we receive from MSR, and we could ultimately receive substantially less than what we paid for such assets.
Prepayment rates may be affected by a number of factors including mortgage rates, the availability of mortgage credit, the relative economic vitality of the area in which the related properties are located, the average remaining life of the loans, the average size of the remaining loans, the servicing of the mortgage loans, changes in tax laws, other opportunities for investment, homeowner mobility and other economic, social, geographic, demographic and legal factors. Consequently, prepayment rates cannot be predicted with certainty. In making investment decisions, we depend on certain assumptions based upon historical trends with respect to the relationship between interest rates and prepayments under normal market conditions. If dislocations in the residential mortgage market or other developments change the way that prepayment trends have historically responded to interest rate changes, our ability to (i) assess the market value of target assets, (ii) implement hedging strategies and (iii) implement techniques to hedge prepayment risks would be significantly affected, which could materially adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. If we make erroneous assumptions regarding prepayment rates in connection with our investment decisions, we may experience significant investment losses.
A prolonged economic slowdown, a lengthy or severe recession or declining real estate values could impair our assets and harm our operations.
The risks associated with our business are more severe during periods of economic slowdown or recession, especially if these periods are accompanied by declining real estate values. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by a residential property typically is dependent upon the income or assets of the borrower. During an economic slowdown, unemployment rises and increasing numbers of borrowers have difficulty in making payments on their debts, including on mortgage loans. When a recession is combined with declining real estate values, as was the case following the 2008 financial crisis, defaults on mortgages may increase dramatically.
Owners of Agency RMBS are protected from the risk of default on the underlying mortgages by guarantees from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or, in the case of the Ginnie Mae, the U.S. government. However, we also own non-Agency securities, which are backed by residential real property but, in contrast to Agency RMBS, the principal and interest payments are not guaranteed by GSEs or the U.S. government. Our non-Agency securities are therefore particularly sensitive to recessions and declining real estate values.

2217


In the event of a default on a mortgage loan that we hold in our portfolio or a mortgage loan underlying a non-Agency security in our portfolio, we bear the risk of loss as a result of the potential deficiency between the value of the collateral and the debt owed on the mortgage, as well as the costs and delays of foreclosure or other remedies, and the costs of maintaining and ultimately selling a property after foreclosure. Delinquencies and defaults on mortgage loans for which we own the servicing rights will adversely affect the amount of servicing fee income we receive and may result in increased servicing costs and operational risks due to the increased complexity of servicing delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. If an investor in the mortgage loans for which we own the servicing rights determines that the rate of delinquencies or defaults for the loans it owns is unacceptable, we bear the risk of losing the right to service the related mortgage loans which could adversely affect our revenues, business prospects and financial condition.
Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures or losses on our non-Agency securities, mortgage loans, mortgage loans for which we own the servicing rights could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations, financial condition, business prospects and ability to make distributions to stockholders.
ChangesChanges in inter-bank lending rate reporting practices or the method pursuant to which LIBOR is determined may adversely affect the value of our assets and financial obligations that are linked to LIBOR.
LIBOR and other “benchmark” indices have been the subject of recent national, international and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms may cause such benchmarksOn March 5, 2021, Intercontinental Exchange Inc. announced that ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, the administrator of LIBOR, intends to perform differently than instop publication of the past,majority of USD-LIBOR tenors on June 30, 2023. In the U.S., the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, or ARRC, has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, as its preferred alternative rate for U.S. dollar-based LIBOR. SOFR is a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities, and is based on directly observable U.S. Treasury-backed repurchase transactions. The ARRC has proposed a paced market transition plan to SOFR, and various organizations are currently working on industry wide and company-specific transition plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to LIBOR. All of our financing arrangements and derivative instruments that incorporate LIBOR as the referenced rate either mature prior to the phase out of LIBOR or have provisions in place that provide for an alternative to LIBOR upon its phase-out. Additionally, each series of our fixed-to-floating preferred stock that becomes callable at the time the stock begins to pay a LIBOR-based rate has existing LIBOR cessation fallback language. Given the differences between LIBOR and any other alternative benchmark rate that may be established, there are many uncertainties regarding a transition from LIBOR. The consequences which cannot be predicted. In particular, regulators and law enforcement agencies in the U.K. and elsewhere are conducting criminal and civil investigations into whether the banks that contributed information to the British Bankers’ Association, or BBA, in connection with the daily calculation of LIBOR may have been under-reporting or otherwise manipulating or attempting to manipulate LIBOR. A number of BBA member banks have entered into settlements with their regulators and law enforcement agenciesthese developments with respect to this alleged manipulation of LIBOR. Actions by the regulators or law enforcement agenciesLIBOR cannot be entirely predicted, and may span multiple future periods, but could result in changes toan increase in the manner incost of our variable rate debt or derivative financial instruments which LIBOR is determined or the establishment of alternative reference rates. For example, in July 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021.
At this time, it is not possible to predict the effect of any such changes, any establishment of alternative reference rates or any other reforms to LIBOR that may be implemented in the U.K.detrimental to our financial position or elsewhere. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes, alternative reference rates or other reforms may adversely affect the market for or value of any securities on which the interest or dividend is determined by reference to LIBOR, loans, derivatives and other financial obligations or on our overall financial condition or results of operations. More generally, any of the above changes or any other consequential changes to LIBOR or any other “benchmark” index as a result of international, national or other proposals for reform or other initiatives or investigations, or any further uncertainty in relation to the timing and manner of implementation of such changes, could have a material adverse effect on the value of and return on any of our securities based on or linked to such a “benchmark.”operating results.
Our delayed delivery transactions, including TBAs, subject us to certain risks, including price risks and counterparty risks.
We may purchase Agency RMBS throughthrough delayed delivery transactions, including TBAs. In a delayed delivery transaction, we enter into a forward purchase agreement with a counterparty to purchase either (i) an identified Agency RMBS, or (ii) a to-be-issued (or “to-be-announced”) Agency RMBS with certain terms. As with any forward purchase contract, the value of the underlying Agency RMBS may decrease between the contract date and the settlement date. Furthermore, a transaction counterparty may fail to deliver the underlying Agency RMBS at the settlement date. If any of the above risks were to occur, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
It may be uneconomical to roll our TBA dollar roll transactions or we may be unable to meet margin calls on our TBA contracts, which could negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We utilize TBA dollar roll transactions as a means of investing in and financing Agency RMBS. TBA contracts enable us to purchase or sell, for future delivery, Agency RMBS with certain principal and interest terms and certain types of collateral, but the specific securities to be delivered are not identified until shortly before the TBA settlement date. Prior to settlement of the TBA contract we may choose to move the settlement of the securities to a later date by entering into an offsetting position (referred to as a “pair off”), net settling the paired off positions for cash, and simultaneously purchasing a similar TBA contact for a later settlement date, collectively referred to as a “dollar roll”. The Agency RMBS purchased for a forward settlement date under the TBA contracts are typically priced at a discount to Agency RMBS for settlement in the current month. This difference (or discount) is referred to as the “price drop.” The price drop is the economic equivalent of net interest carry income on the underlying Agency RMBS over the roll period (interest income less implied financing cost) and is commonly referred to as a “dollar roll income.” Consequently, dollar roll transactions and such forward purchase of Agency RMBS represent a form of off-balance sheet financing and increase our “at-risk” leverage.

23




Under certain market conditions, TBA dollar roll transactions may result in negative carry income whereby the Agency RMBS purchasepurchased for a forward settlement date under TBA contract are priced at a premium to Agency RMBS for settlement in the current month. Under such conditions, it may be uneconomical to roll our TBA positions prior to the settlement date, and we couldmay have to take physical delivery of the underlying securities and settle our obligations for cash. We may not have sufficient funds or alternative financing sources available to settle such obligations. In addition, pursuant to the margin provisions established by the Mortgage-Backed Securities Division (“MBSD”)(MBSD) of the FICC, we are subject to margin calls on our TBA contracts. Further, our prime brokerage agreements may require us to post additional margin above the levels established by the MBSD. Negative carry income on TBA dollar roll transactions orAny failure to procure adequate financing to settle our obligations or meet margin calls under our TBA contracts could result in defaults or force us to sell assets under adverse market conditions or through foreclosure and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We acquire RMBS collateralized by subprime mortgage loans, which are subject to increased risks.
Among other assets, we acquire RMBS backed by collateral pools of subprime mortgage loans, which are mortgage loans that have been originated using underwriting standards that are less conservative than those used in underwriting prime mortgage loans (mortgage loans that generally conform to GSE underwriting guidelines) and Alt-A mortgage loans (mortgage loans made to borrowers whose qualifying mortgage characteristics do not conform to GSE underwriting guidelines and generally allow homeowners to qualify for a mortgage loan with reduced or alternate forms of documentation). These lower standards include mortgage loans made to borrowers having imperfect or impaired credit histories, mortgage loans where the amount of the loan at origination is 80% or more of the value of the mortgage property, mortgage loans made to borrowers with low credit scores, mortgage loans made to borrowers who have other debt that represents a large portion of their income and mortgage loans made to borrowers whose income is not required to be disclosed or verified. Due to economic conditions, including increased interest rates and lower home prices, as well as aggressive lending practices, subprime mortgage loans have in the past experienced increased rates of delinquency, foreclosure, bankruptcy and loss, and may in the future experience delinquency, foreclosure, bankruptcy and loss rates that may be substantially higher, than those experienced by mortgage loans underwritten in a more traditional manner. In acquiring these assets, we endeavor to factor the risk of losses on the underlying mortgages into the purchase price of the asset. If we underestimate those losses, however, the performance of RMBS backed by subprime mortgage loans that we acquire could be adversely affected, which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and business.
Our portfolio of assets may be concentrated in terms of credit risk.
Although as a general policy we seek to acquire and hold a diverse portfolio of assets, we are not required to observe specific diversification criteria, except as may be set forth in the investment guidelines adopted by our board of directors. Therefore, our asset portfolio may at times be concentrated in certain property types that are subject to higher risk of foreclosure, or secured by properties concentrated in a limited number of geographic locations. To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in any one region or type of asset, downturns relating generally to such region or type of asset may result in defaults on a number of our assets within a short time period, which may reduce our net income and the value of our shares and accordingly reduce our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. The portfolio may contain other concentrations of risk, and we may fail to identify, detect or hedge against those risks, resulting in large or unexpected losses.
Our subordinated RMBS may be in the “first loss” position, subjecting us to greater risk of losses.
We invest in certain tranches of RMBS that are only entitled to a portion of the principal and interest payments made on mortgage loans underlying the securities issued by the trust. In general, losses on a mortgage loan included in such a trust will be borne first by the equity holder of the issuing trust, and then by the “first loss” subordinated security holder and then by the “second loss” mezzanine holder. We may acquire securities at every level of such a trust, from the equity holder to the most senior tranche. In the event of default and the exhaustion of any classes of securities junior to those which we acquire, our securities will suffer losses as well. In addition, if we overvalue the underlying mortgage portfolio, or if the values subsequently decline and, as a result, less collateral is available to satisfy interest and principal payments due on the related RMBS, the securities which we acquire may effectively become the “first loss” position behind the more senior securities, which may result in significant losses. The prices of lower credit quality securities are generally less sensitive to interest rate changes than more highly rated securities, but more sensitive to adverse economic downturns or individual issuer developments. A projection of an economic downturn could cause a decline in the value of lower credit quality securities because the ability of obligors of mortgages underlying RMBS to make principal and interest payments may be impaired. In such event, existing credit support in the securitization structure may be insufficient to protect us against loss of our principal on these securities.
Increases in interest rates could adversely affect the value of our assets and cause our interest expense to increase, which could result in reduced earnings or losses and negatively affect our profitability as well as the cash available for distribution to stockholders.increase.
Our operating results will depend in large part on the difference between the income from our assets net of credit losses, and financing costs. We anticipate that, in many cases, the income from our assets will respond more slowly to interest rate fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings. Consequently, changes in interest rates, particularly short-term interest rates, may significantly influence our financial results.

24




Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control. For example, the Federal Reserve made several cuts to the federal funds target rate in 2019, following several years of gradual increases. We cannot predict the impact that recent rate cuts, or any future actions or non-actions by the Federal Reserve with respect to the federal funds rate or otherwise may have on the markets or the economy. Interest rate fluctuations present a variety of risks, including the risk of a narrowing of the difference between asset yields and borrowing rates, flattening or inversion of the yield curve and fluctuating prepayment rates.
In a normal yield curve environment, fixed income assets, including many Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities, decline in value if interest rates increase. If long-term rates increased significantly, not only will the market value
18

We endeavor to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates, but there can be no assurances that our hedges will be successful, or that we will be able to enter into or maintain such hedges. As a result, interest rate fluctuations can cause significant losses, reductions in income, and limitations on our cash available for distribution to stockholders.
An increase in interest rates may cause a decrease in the availability of certain of our target assets, which could adversely affect our ability to acquire target assets that satisfy our investment objectives and to generate income and pay dividends.
Rising interest rates generally reduce the demand for mortgage loans due to the higher cost of borrowing. A reduction in the volume of mortgage loans originated may affect the volume of certain target assets available to us, which could adversely affect our ability to acquire assets that satisfy our investment and business objectives. Rising interest rates may also cause certain target assets that were issued prior to an interest rate increase to provide yields that are below prevailing market interest rates. If rising interest rates cause us to be unable to acquire a sufficient volume of our target assets with a yield that is above our borrowing cost, our ability to satisfy our investment objectives and to generate income and pay dividends may be materially and adversely affected.
The assets in our portfolio are recorded at fair value, but there may be substantial uncertainty as to the value of certain assets.
Some of the assets in our portfolio are not publicly traded. The fair value of securities and other assets that are not publicly traded may not be readily determinable. We value these assets quarterly at fair value, as determined in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which may include unobservable inputs. Because such valuations are subjective, the fair value of certain of our assets may fluctuate over short periods of time and our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these securities existed. The value of our common stock could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of these assets are materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon their disposal.
Our MSR are recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets based upon significant estimates and assumptions. The determination of the fair value of MSR requires our management to make numerous estimates and assumptions. Such estimates and assumptions include, without limitation, estimates of future cash flows associated with MSR based upon assumptions involving interest rates as well as the prepayment rates, delinquencies and foreclosure rates of the underlying mortgage loans. The ultimate realization of the value of MSR may be materially different than the fair values of such MSR as may be reflected in our consolidated balance sheets as of any particular date. The use of different estimates or assumptions in connection with the valuation of these assets could produce materially different fair values for such assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Accordingly, there may be material uncertainty about the fair value of any MSR we acquire.
The value of our Agency RMBS non-Agency securities and MSR may be adversely affected by deficiencies in servicing and foreclosure practices, as well as related delays in the foreclosure process.
Deficiencies in servicing and foreclosure practices among servicers of residential mortgage loans have raised and may in the future raise concerns relating to such practices, including the improper execution of the documents used in foreclosure proceedings (so-called “robo signing”), inadequate documentation of transfers and registrations of mortgages and assignments of loans, improper handling of loss mitigation for mortgagors who fall behind in their payments, violations of representations and warranties at the date of securitization and failure to enforce put-backs.practices. The integrity of the servicing and foreclosure processes is critical to the value of our Agency RMBS non-Agency securities and MSR, and our financial results could be adversely affected by deficiencies in the conduct of those processes. For example, delays in the foreclosure process that may result from improper servicing practices may adversely affect the values of, and our losses on, our mortgage-related assets. Foreclosure delays may also increase the administrative expenses of the securitization trusts for non-Agency securities or result in the curtailment of payments to the GSEs, thereby resulting in additional expense and reducing the amount of funds available for distribution to investors. In addition, the subordinate classes of securities issued by the securitization trusts may continue to receive interest payments while the defaulted loans remain in the trusts, rather than absorbing the default losses. This may reduce the amount of credit support available for any senior classes we own, thus possibly adversely affecting these securities.

25




While we believe that our servicers would be in violation of their servicing contracts to the extent that they have improperly serviced mortgage loans or improperly executed documents in foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings, or do not comply with the terms of servicing contracts and applicable laws and regulations when assessing loss mitigation options for affected borrowers, it may be difficult, expensive, and time consuming for us to enforce our contractual rights. Such failure to comply may also expose us to regulatory risks. We continue to monitor and review the issues raised by improper servicing practices. While we cannot predict exactly how servicing, loss mitigation and foreclosure matters or any resulting litigation, regulatory actions or settlement agreements will affect our business, there can be no assurance that these matters will not have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Risks RelatedLegal matters related to the termination of our Management and RelationshipAgreement with PRCM Advisers and Pine Rivermay adversely affect our business, results of operations, and/or financial condition.
We are dependent onOn August 14, 2020, our Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers terminated and Pine River and may not findwe thereafter became a suitable replacement if we orself-managed company. In connection with the termination of our Management Agreement, PRCM Advisers terminatesfiled a complaint in federal court that alleges, among other things, the management agreement.
We have no employees. Instead, we are reliant onmisappropriation of trade secrets in violation of both the employees providedDefend Trade Secrets Act and New York common law, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition and business practices, unjust enrichment, conversion, and tortious interference with contract. The complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining the company from making any use of or disclosing PRCM Advisers’ trade secret, proprietary, or confidential information; damages in an amount to usbe determined at a hearing and/or trial; disgorgement of the company’s wrongfully obtained profits; and fees and costs incurred by PRCM Advisers whichin pursuing the action. Our board of directors believes the complaint is without merit and that the company has significant discretion ascomplied with the terms of the Management Agreement. However, the results of litigation are inherently uncertain. It is possible that a court could enjoin us from using certain intellectual property. In addition, any damages or costs and fees that may be awarded to PRCM Advisers related to the implementationlitigation may be significant. While we dispute and execution of our business strategies and risk management practices. PRCM Advisers may not have sufficient accessintend to Pine River’s employees, systems and facilities in order to comply with its obligations undervigorously defend against the management agreement. We are also subject to the risk that PRCM Advisers will terminate the management agreement and that no suitable replacement will be found.
The current term of the management agreement expires on October 28, 2020 and will automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless terminated by us or PRCM Advisers asclaims set forth in the management agreement. Ifcomplaint, it is possible that the management agreement is terminated and no suitable replacement is found to manage Two Harbors or we are unable to hire our own qualified employees, we may not be able to continue to execute our business plan.
We will have no recourse to Pine River if it does not fulfill its obligations underresults of the shared facilities and services agreementlitigation with PRCM Advisers.
Neither we nor PRCM Advisers has any employees, and PRCM Advisers does not have separate facilities. As a result, PRCM Advisers has entered into a shared facilities and services agreement with Pine River pursuant to which PRCM Advisers is provided with the personnel, services and resources necessary for PRCM Advisers to perform its obligations and responsibilities under the management agreement in exchange for certain amounts payable by PRCM Advisers. Because we are not a party to the shared facilities and services agreement, we will not have any recourse to Pine River if it does not fulfill its obligations under the shared facilities and services agreement, or if Pine River and PRCM Advisers choose to amend or terminate the shared facilities and services agreement.
There are conflicts of interest in our relationship with Pine River and its affiliates, including PRCM Advisers, which could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders.
We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with Pine River and its affiliates, including PRCM Advisers. PRCM Advisers is wholly owned by Pine River. Thomas Siering (a director, and our Chief Executive Officer and President) is a partner and owner of equity interests in Pine River. All of our other executive officers are employees of Pine River. The management agreement with PRCM Advisers was negotiated between related parties, and its terms, including fees payable to PRCM Advisers, may not be as favorable to us as if they had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party. In addition, we may choose not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under the management agreement because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with PRCM Advisers.
The management agreement with PRCM Advisers does not prevent PRCM Advisers and its affiliates from engaging in additional management or investment opportunities. Pine River and its affiliates, including PRCM Advisers, may engage in additional management or investment opportunities that have overlapping objectives with us, and thus face conflicts in the allocation of resources between us, any other funds they manage and for their own accounts. For example, Pine River serves as the external manager for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (NYSE: GPMT) (“Granite Point”). In 2017, we contributed our commercial real estate business to Granite Point and subsequently distributed to our common stockholders the shares of Granite Point common stock that we received in connection with that contribution. Thomas Siering serves as a director of Granite Point, and a number of Pine River non-investment personnel who provide services to Two Harbors have also continued to provide support to Granite Point’s operations.
The ability of PRCM Advisers, Pine River and the officers and employees providing services to Two Harbors under the management agreement to engage in other business activities reduces the time PRCM Advisers spends managing Two Harbors. While there are a number of employees of Pine River who allocate 100% of their time to Two Harbors, certain employees who provide services to Two Harbors allocate some, or a material portion, of their time to other businesses and activities of Pine River. Under the management agreement, none of these individuals is required to devote a specific amount of time to Two Harbors’ affairs. Accordingly, we compete with Pine River, its existing funds, investment vehicles and other ventures, including Granite Point, for the time and attention of these officers and other personnel.

26




We may enter into additional transactions with Pine River, its affiliates or the investment vehicles that it manages. In particular, we may purchase assets from Pine River or its affiliates or make co-purchases alongside Pine River or its affiliates. These transactions may not be the result of arm’s length negotiations and may involve conflicts between our interests and the interests of Pine River and/or its affiliates. There can be no assurance that any procedural protections will be sufficient to assure that these transactions will be made on terms that will be at least as favorable to us as those that would have been obtained in an arm’s length transaction.
We compete with current and future investment entities affiliated with Pine River for access to certain of the benefits that our relationship with Pine River provides to us, including access to investment opportunities.
There may be conflicts of interest in allocating investment opportunities among Two Harbors and other funds, investment vehicles and ventures managed by Pine River, including Granite Point. There may be overlap in the assets and investment strategies of Two Harbors and Pine River’s private funds, and additional areas of overlap may develop in the future. Although PRCM Advisers and Pine River have a dedicated team of trading and investment personnel to serve Two Harbors full-time, in some cases certain non-investment personnel may provide services to both entities as well as Granite Point. Additionally, there are other members of the Pine River investment team that are dedicated full-time to other Pine River strategies and clients and, therefore, do not devote any of their time to Two Harbors and its trading activities. Pine River and its affiliates may in the future form additional funds or sponsor additional investment vehicles and ventures that have overlapping objectives with Two Harbors and therefore may compete with us for investment opportunities and Pine River resources. Pine River has an allocation policy that addresses the manner in which investment opportunities are allocated among the various entities and strategies for which they provide investment management services. However, we cannot assure you that Pine River and PRCM Advisers will always allocate investment opportunities in a manner that is advantageous for us; indeed, we may expect that the allocation of investment opportunities will at times result in our receiving only a portion of, or none of, certain investment opportunities.
The loss of our access to Pine River’s investment professionals and principals may adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to execute our business, plan.
We depend on PRCM Advisers’ access, through a shared facilities and services agreement, to the investment professionals and principalsresults of Pine River and the information opportunities generated by Pine River’s investment professionals and principals. These investment professionals and principals evaluate, negotiate, structure, close and monitor our investments and our financing activities and we depend on their continued service. The loss of access to these investment professionals operations, and/or principals, whether through their departure from Pine River or the termination of our management agreement, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to execute our business plan. In addition, the individual agreements these investment professionals and principals have with Pine River contain non-solicitation, confidentiality and, with respect to our Chief Executive Officer, non-competition provisions that may prohibit or otherwise restrict their ability to support Two Harbors in the event of a termination of our management agreement. We cannot assure you that PRCM Advisers will remain as Two Harbors’ manager, that Pine River will continue to be able to support our business and operations consistent with historical practice or that we will continue to have access to Pine River’s investment professionals or principals.
Our board of directors has approved very broad investment guidelines for Two Harbors and will not review or approve each investment decision made by PRCM Advisers.
Our board of directors periodically reviews and updates our investment guidelines and also reviews our investment portfolio but does not review or approve specific investments. PRCM Advisers has great latitude within the broad parameters of the investment guidelines set by our board of directors in determining our investments and investment strategies, which could result in investment returns that are substantially below expectations or that result in material losses.
The manner of determining the management fee may not provide sufficient incentive to PRCM Advisers to maximize risk-adjusted returns on our investment portfolio because it is based on our stockholders’ equity and not on our financial performance.
PRCM Advisers is entitled to receive a management fee that is based on our stockholders’ equity at the end of each quarter, regardless of our financial performance. Accordingly, significant management fees will be payable to PRCM Advisers even if we have a net loss during a quarter. PRCM Advisers’ right to such compensation may not provide sufficient incentive to PRCM Advisers to devote sufficient time and effort to maximize risk-adjusted returns on our investment portfolio, which could, in turn, adversely affect our financial results. Further, the management fee structure gives PRCM Advisers the incentive to maximize stockholders’ equity by the issuance of new common or preferred stock or the retention of existing equity, regardless of the effect of these actions on existing stockholders. In other words, the management fee structure rewards PRCM Advisers primarily based on the size of Two Harbors, and not on our returns to stockholders.

27




Termination of the management agreement may be difficult and costly, which may adversely affect our inclination to end our relationship with PRCM Advisers.
Termination of the management agreement with PRCM Advisers may be difficult and costly. We have the right to terminate for cause; however, the term “cause” is limited to certain specifically described circumstances. In the absence of cause, we may elect not to renew the management agreement upon the vote of at least two-thirds of all of our independent directors or by a vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock, and only for the reasons set forth in the management contract. Additionally, in the event we elect not to renew the management agreement (or upon a termination by PRCM Advisers due to our material breach), the management agreement requires us to pay PRCM Advisers a termination payment equal to three times the sum of the average annual base management fee received by PRCM Advisers during the 24-month period before such termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter. Further, in the event of a termination of the management agreement whether for cause or our election not to renew, it may be difficult or costly to replace certain intellectual property, systems, facilities or other services that have been historically provided by or contracted through Pine River that are necessary or desirable to execute our business plan.
The liability of PRCM Advisers and Pine River is limited under the management agreement, and we have agreed to indemnify PRCM Advisers and its affiliates and advisers, including Pine River, against certain liabilities. As a result, we could experience poor performance or losses for which PRCM Advisers and Pine River would not be liable.
Pursuant to the management agreement, PRCM Advisers does not assume any responsibility other than to render the services called for thereunder and will not be responsible for any action of our board of directors in following or declining to follow its advice or recommendations. PRCM Advisers and its officers, stockholders, members, managers, personnel and directors, any person controlling or controlled by PRCM Advisers and any person providing sub-advisory services to PRCM Advisers will not be liable to Two Harbors, any of our subsidiaries, any of our directors, stockholders or partners or any subsidiary’s stockholders, members or partners for acts or omissions performed in accordance with or pursuant to the management agreement, except by reason of acts constituting reckless disregard of PRCM Advisers’ duties under the management agreement which has a material adverse effect on Two Harbors, willful misconduct or gross negligence, as determined by a final non-appealable order of a court of competent jurisdiction. We have agreed to indemnify PRCM Advisers and its affiliates and sub-advisers, including Pine River, with respect to all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims arising from willful misconduct, gross negligence or acts or omissions of such indemnified parties not constituting reckless disregard of PRCM Advisers’ duties under the management agreement which has a material adverse effect on Two Harbors. As a result, if we experience poor performance or losses, PRCM Advisers would not be liable.condition.
Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure
Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control.
Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or MGCL, may have the effect of deterring a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change in control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of such shares.
We are subject to the “business combination” provisions of the MGCL that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations (including a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities) between our company and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of our then outstanding voting stock or an affiliate or associate of our company who, at any time within(as defined under the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding stock)MGCL) or an affiliate thereof for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. AfterIn addition, the five-year prohibition, any business combination between our company and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of at least (1) 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of our voting stock; and (2) two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder. These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if our common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. These provisions of the MGCL do not apply to business combinations that are approved or exempted by a board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Pursuant to the statute, our board of directors has by resolution exempted business combinations (1) between our company and any person, provided that such business combination is first approved by our board of directors (including a majority of our directors who are not affiliates or associates of such person) and (2) between our company and Pine River or its affiliates. Consequently, the five-year prohibition and the super-majority vote requirements will not apply to any business combination between our company and any person if such combination is approved in accordance with the foregoing procedures. As a result, any person, including Pine River, may be able to enter into business combinations with Two Harbors

28




that may not be in the best interests of our stockholders, without compliance with the super-majority vote requirements and the other provisions of the statute.
The “control share” provisions of the MGCL provide that “control shares” of a Maryland corporation (defined as voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquirer or in respect of which the acquirer is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquirer to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of “control shares”) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding votes entitled to be cast by the acquirer of control shares, our officers and employees who are also our directors. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of shares of our stock. There can be no assurance that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.
The “unsolicited takeover” provisions of the MGCL (Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL) permit our board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or bylaws, to implement takeover defenses, some of which (for example, a classified board) we do not currently have. These provisions may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for our company or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holderscompany.
19

Our authorized but unissued shares of common and preferred stock and the ownership limitations contained in our charter may prevent a change in control.
Our charter authorizes Two Harbors to issue additional authorized but unissued shares of common or preferred stock. In addition, our board of directors may, with the approval of a majority of the entire board and without stockholder approval, amend our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of our stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that Two Harbors has the authority to issue and classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock and set the terms of the classified or reclassified shares. As a result, our board may establish a series of shares of common or preferred stock that could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for shares of our common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of stockholders.
In addition, our charter contains restrictions limiting the ownership and transfer of shares of our common stock and other outstanding shares of capital stock. The relevant sections of our charter provide that, subject to certain exceptions, ownership of shares of our common stock by any person is limited to 9.8% by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding shares of common stock (the common share ownership limit), and no more than 9.8% by value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding capital stock (the aggregate share ownership limit). The common share ownership limit and the aggregate share ownership limit are collectively referred to herein as the “ownership limits.” These charter provisions will restrict the ability of persons to purchase shares in excess of the relevant ownership limits.
Our charter contains provisions that make removal of our directors difficult, which could make it difficult for stockholders to effect changes in management.
Our charter provides that, subject to the rights of any series of preferred stock, a director may be removed only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast generally in the election of directors. Our charter and bylaws provide that vacancies generally may be filled only by a majority of the remaining directors in office, even if less than a quorum. These requirements make it more difficult to change management by removing and replacing directors and may prevent a change in control that is in the best interests of stockholders.
Our rights and stockholders’ rights to take action against directors and officers are limited, which could limit recourse in the event of actions not in the best interests of stockholders.
As permitted by Maryland law, our charter eliminates the liability of its directors and officers to Two Harbors and its stockholders for money damages, except for liability resulting from:
actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or
a final judgment based upon a finding of active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was material to the cause of action adjudicated.
In addition, pursuant to our charter we have agreed contractually to indemnify our present and former directors and officers for actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Further, our bylaws require us to indemnify each present or former director or officer, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to any proceeding because of his or her service to Two Harbors. As part of these indemnification obligations, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers.

29




Our amended and restated bylaws designate certain Maryland courts as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.stockholders.
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, or, if that Court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, shall be the sole and exclusive forum for the following: any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the corporation;company; any action asserting a claim of breach of any duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to the corporationcompany or to our stockholders; any action asserting a claim against the corporationcompany or any of our directors, officers or other employees arising pursuant to any provision of the MGCL or our charter or bylaws; or any action asserting a claim against the corporationcompany or any of our directors, officers or other employees that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that the stockholder believes is favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions
20

Risks Related to Our Securities
Future issuances and sales of shares of our common stock may depress the market price of our common stock or have adverse consequences for our stockholders.
We have 450,000,000 authorizedmay issue additional shares of our common stock in public offerings, private placements as well as through equity awards to our directors, officers and we may increase our authorized common stock without stockholder approval. As of December 31, 2019, 272,935,731 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. In May 2015, our stockholders approvedemployees pursuant to our Second Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan or the Plan, which provides for grants of restricted common stock and other equity-based awards, subject to a ceiling of 6,500,000 shares available for issuance under the Plan. As of December 31, 2019, an aggregate of 1,713,651 shares of common stock remained available for issuance to our independent directors and Pine River employees pursuant to the2021 Equity Incentive Plan. Additionally, shares of our common stock have also been reserved for issuance in connection with the conversion of our 6.25% convertible senior notes due January 20222026 and our Series A, Series B and Series C Series D and Series E preferred stock.
We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future issuances or sales of our common stock on the market price of our common stock. We also cannot predict the amounts and timing of restricted stockequity awards to be issued pursuant to the Plan,our equity incentive plans, nor can we predict the amount and timing of any conversions of our 6.25% convertible senior notes due January 20222026 or our Series A, Series B Series C, Series D and Series EC preferred stock into shares of our common stock. Any stock offerings, awards or conversions resulting in the issuance of substantial amounts of common stock, or the perception that such awards or conversions could occur, may adversely affect the market price for our common stock.
Also, we may issue additional shares in subsequent public offerings or private placements to raise capital, acquire new assets or for other purposes. We are not required to offer any such shares to existing stockholders on a preemptive basis. Therefore, it may not be possible for existing stockholders to participate in such future share issuances, which may dilute the existing stockholders’ interests.
Any future offerings of our securities could dilute our existing stockholders and may rank senior for purposes of dividend and liquidating distributions.
In orderWe may from time to grow our business, we may rely on additional issuances oftime issue securities which may rank senior and/or be dilutive to our stockholders. For example, our senior unsecured notes due January 20222026 are convertible into shares of our common stock at the election of the noteholder, and our Series A, Series B Series C, Series D and Series EC preferred shares may be converted into shares of our common stock following the occurrence of certain events, as set forth in the Articles Supplementaryarticles supplementary for each series. Any election by noteholders or preferred stockholders to convert their notes or preferred shares into shares of our common stock will dilute the interests of other common stockholders. In addition, upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities would receive a distribution of our available assets before holders of our shares.

30




In the future, we may again elect to raise capital through the issuance of convertible or non-convertible debt or common or preferred equity securities. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and preferred stock, if any, and lenders with respect to other borrowings will be entitled to our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Convertible debt and convertible preferred stock may have anti-dilution provisions which are unfavorable to our common stockholders. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Any preferred stock could have a preference on liquidating distributions or a preference on dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders or favorable conversion rights. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock or the sale of securities which have rights and preferences that are superior to our common stock, or the perception that these sales could occur, may have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Because our decision to issue debt or equity securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting the value of their holdings.
We have not established a minimum distribution payment level and we cannot assure you of our ability to pay distributions in the future.
We intend to continue to pay quarterly distributions and to make distributions to our stockholders in an amount such that we distribute all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income in each year, subject to certain adjustments.year. We have not established a minimum distribution payment level and our ability to pay distributions may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the risk factors described herein. All distributions will be made, subject to Maryland law, at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, any debt covenants, maintenance of our REIT qualification and other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time.relevant. We cannot assure you that we will achieve results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash distributions and distributions in future periods may be significantly lower than in prior quarterly periods.
The market price of our common stock could fluctuate and could cause you to lose a significant part of your investment.
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations.volatile. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. The stock market has experienced and may in the future experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many companies in industries similar or related to ours and that have been unrelated to these companies’ operating performances. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares of our common stock at a gain. Further, fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock may adversely affect the liquidity of the trading market for our common stock and, in the event that we seek to raise capital through future equity financings, our ability to raise such equity capital. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future.
The market price of our common stock may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including those described above and the following:
without limitation: changes in financial estimates by analysts;
fluctuations in our results of operations or financial condition or the results of operations or financial condition of companies perceived to be similar to us;
general economic and financial and real estate market conditions;
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
monetary policy and regulatory developments in the U.S.; and
additions or departures of key personnel at Pine River.
Resulting fluctuations in the market price of our common stock could cause you to lose a significant part of your investment.

personnel.
31
21


Tax Risks
Our failure to qualify as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax and potentially increased state and local taxes, which would reduce the amount of our income available for distribution to our stockholders.
We operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify as a REIT and have elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2009. We have not requested and do not intend to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, that we qualify as a REIT. The U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs and the assets they hold are complex, and judicial and administrative interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing REIT qualification are limited. To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must meet, on an ongoing basis, various tests regarding the nature of our assets and income, the ownership of our outstanding shares, and the amount of our distributions. Moreover, new legislation, court decisions, administrative guidance or actions by federal agencies or others to modify or re-characterize our assets as a whole or in part, as other than real estate assets, in each case possibly with retroactive effect, may make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. Thus, while we intend to operate so that we qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, no assurance can be given that we will so qualify for any particular year. These considerations also might restrict the types of assets that we can acquire in the future.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, we would be required to pay U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income, and distributions to our stockholders would not be deductible by us in determining our taxable income. In such a case, we might need to borrow money or sell assets in order to pay taxes. Our payment of income tax would decrease the amount of income available for distribution to stockholders. Furthermore, if we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we no longer would be required to distribute substantially all of our net taxable income to stockholders. In addition, unless we were eligible for certain statutory relief provisions, we could not re-elect to be taxed as a REIT until the fifth calendar year following the year in which we failed to qualify.
Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive investment opportunities or financing or hedging strategies.
In order to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy various tests on an annual and quarterly basis regarding the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to stockholders and the ownership of our stock. To meet these tests, we may be required to forego investments we might otherwise make. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution, and may be unable to pursue investments that would be otherwise advantageous to us in order to satisfy the source of income or asset diversification requirements for qualifying as a REIT.times. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our investment performance.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise profitable assets.
In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and designated real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and shares in other REITs. Subject to certain exceptions, our ownership of securities, other than government securities and securities that constitute real estate assets, generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our total assets, other than government securities and securities that constitute real estate assets, can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs, and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can consist of debt of “publicly offered” REITs (i.e., REITs that are required to file annual and periodic reports with the SEC under the Exchange Act) that is not secured by real property or interests in real property. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must generally correct such failure within 30 days after the end of such calendar quarter to avoid losing our REIT qualification. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise profitable assets prematurely, which could reduce our return on assets, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Potential characterization of distributions or gain on sale may be treated as unrelated business taxable income to tax exempt investors.
If (i) all or a portion of our assets are subject to the rules relating to taxable mortgage pools, (ii) we are a “pension held REIT,” (iii) a tax exempt stockholder has incurred debt to purchase or hold our common stock, or (iv) we purchase residual REMIC interests that generate “excess inclusion income,” then a portion of the distributions to and, in the case of a stockholder described in clause (iii), gains realized on the sale of common stock by such tax exempt stockholder may be subject to U.S. federal income tax as unrelated business taxable income under the Code.

32




Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.
The REIT provisions of the Code may limit our ability to hedge our assets and liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income test if we properly identify the transaction as specified in applicable Treasury Regulations and we enter into such transaction (i) in the normal course of our business primarily to manage risk of interest rate or price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary obligations incurred or to be incurred, to acquire or carry real estate assets or (ii) primarily to manage risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that would be qualifying income under the 75% or 95% gross income tests. In addition, income from certain new hedging transactions that counteract prior qualifying hedging transactions described in (i) and (ii) above may not constitute gross income for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests if we properly identify the new hedging transaction as specified in applicable Treasury Regulations. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of these gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we intend to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our TRSs would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in our TRSs, generally, will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income in the TRSs.activities.
22

The failure of our Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities that are subject to a repurchase agreement to qualify as real estate assets would adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.
We may enter into repurchase agreements under which we will nominally sell certain of our Agency RMBS or non-Agency securities to a counterparty and simultaneously enter into an agreement to repurchase the sold assets. We believe that we will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as the owner of the securities that are the subject of any such agreement notwithstanding that such agreement may transfer record ownership of the assets to the counterparty during the term of the agreement. It is possible, however, that the IRS could assert that we did not own the securities during the term of the repurchase agreement, in which case we could fail to qualify as a REIT.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan and may require us to incur debt, sell assets or take other actions to make such distributions.
In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to stockholders, each calendar year, at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (including certain items of non-cash income), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. To the extent that we satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income. In addition, we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our distributions in any calendar year are less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal income tax law.
We intend to distribute our net income to stockholders in a manner intended to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement and to avoid both corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax. Our taxable income may substantially exceed our net income as determined by U.S. GAAP or differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash may occur in which case we may have taxable income in excess of cash flow from our operating activities. In such event, we may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year and find it difficult or impossible to meet the REIT distribution requirements in certain circumstances. In such circumstances, in order to satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax in that year, we may be required to: (i) sell assets in adverse market conditions, (ii) borrow on unfavorable terms, (iii) distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt or (iv) make a taxable distribution of our shares as part of a distribution in which stockholders may elect to receive shares or (subject to a limit measured as a percentage of the total distribution) cash, in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. Thus, compliance with the REIT distribution requirements may require us to take actions that may not otherwise be advisable given existing market conditions and hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Even though we have elected to be taxed as a REIT, we may be required to pay certain taxes.
Even though we have elected to be taxed as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, prohibited transactions, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, franchise, property and transfer taxes, including mortgage recording taxes. In addition, we will hold some of our assets through wholly owned TRSs. Our TRSs and any other taxable corporations in which we own an interest will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate taxes. Payment of these taxes generally would reduce our cash flow and the amount available to distribute to stockholders.

33




Our qualification as a REIT may depend on the accuracy of legal opinions or advice rendered or given or statements by the issuers of assets we acquire, including with respect to the treatment of our TBA securities and transactions for tax purposes and the inaccuracy of any such opinions, advice or statements may adversely affect our REIT qualification and result in significant corporate-level tax..purposes.
When purchasing securities, we may rely on opinions or advice of counsel for the issuer of such securities, or statements made in related offering documents, for purposes of determining, among other things, whether such securities represent debt or equity securities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the value of such securities, and also to what extent those securities constitute qualified real estate assets for purposes of the REIT asset tests and produce qualified income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. In addition, we may from time to time obtain and rely upon opinions of counsel regarding the qualification of certain assets and income as real estate assets. The inaccuracy of any such opinions, advice or statements may adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT and result in significant corporate-level tax.
We may utilize TBAs as a means of investing and financing Agency RMBS. There is no direct authority with respect to the qualification of TBAs as real estate assets or U.S. government securities for purposes of the 75% asset test or the qualification of income or gains from dispositions of TBAs as gains from the sale of real property (including interests in real property and interests in mortgages on real property) or other qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. We intend to treat our TBAs as qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test, to the extent set forth in an opinion from Sidley Austin LLP substantially to the effect that, for purposes of the 75% asset test, our ownership of TBAs should be treated as ownership of the underlying Agency RMBSs,RMBS, and to treat income and gains from our TBAs as qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, to the extent set forth in an opinion from Sidley Austin LLP substantially to the effect that, for purposes of the 75% gross income test, any gain recognized by us in connection with the settlement of our TBAs should be treated as gain from the sale or disposition of the underlying Agency RMBS. Such opinions of counsel are not binding on the IRS, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not successfully challenge the conclusions set forth therein. In addition, the opinion of Sidley Austin LLP is based on various assumptions relating to our TBAs and is conditioned upon fact-based representations and covenants made by our management regarding our TBAs. If the IRS were to successfully challenge the opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, we could be subject to a penalty tax or we could fail to remain qualified as a REIT if a sufficient portion of our assets consists of TBAs or a sufficient portion of our income consists of income or gains from the disposition of TBAs.
Our ownership of, and relationship with, our TRSs will be restricted and a failure to comply with the restrictions would jeopardize our REIT status and may result in the application of a 100% excise tax.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may earn income that would not be qualifying REIT income if earned directly by the parent REIT. Both the TRS and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% of the value of a REIT’s total assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. The value of our interests in and thus the amount of assets held in a TRS may also be restricted by our need to qualify for an exclusion from regulation as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
Any domestic TRS we own or may form will pay U.S. federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates on any income that it earns.rates. In addition, the TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.
We expect that the aggregate value of all TRS stock and securities owned by us should be less than 20% of the value of our total assets. Although we monitor our investments in and transactions with TRSs, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the limitation on the value of our TRSs discussed above or to avoid application of the 100% excise tax discussed above.
We may be required to report taxable income with respect to certain of our investments in excess of the economic income we ultimately realize from them.
We may acquire interests in debt instruments in the secondary market for less than their face amount. The discount at which such interests in debt instruments are acquired may reflect doubts about their ultimate collectability rather than current market interest rates. The amount of such discount may nevertheless be treated as “market discount” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Market discount on a debt instrument may accrue based on the assumption that all future payments on the debt instrument will be made. Accrued market discount is reported as income when, and to the extent that, any payment of principal of the debt instrument is made. In the case of residential mortgage loans, principal payments are ordinarily made monthly, and consequently, accrued market discount may have to be included in income each month as if the debt instrument were assured of ultimately being collected in full. If we collect less on a debt instrument than its purchase price plus the market discount we had previously reported as income, we may not be able to benefit from any offsetting loss deduction in a subsequent taxable year.
Similarly, some of the mortgage-backed securities that we purchase will likely have been issued with original issue discount, or OID. We may be required to report such OID based on a constant yield method and income would accrue over the period we own the underlying security. This may lead to an accrual of OID income in excess of the amount that is collected. An offsetting

3423


loss deduction will become available only in the later year in which uncollectability is provable or ultimate disposition; and may be subject to limitation.
Finally, in the event that any debt instruments or mortgage-backed securities acquired by us are delinquent as to mandatory principal and interest payments, or in the event a borrower with respect to a particular debt instrument acquired by us encounters financial difficulty rendering it unable to pay stated interest as due, we may nonetheless be required to continue to recognize the unpaid interest as taxable income as it accrues, despite doubt as to its ultimate collectability. Similarly, we may be required to accrue interest income with respect to subordinate mortgage-backed securities at their stated rate regardless of whether corresponding cash payments are received or are ultimately collectible. In each case, while we would in general ultimately have an offsetting loss deduction available to us when such interest was determined to be uncollectable; the utility of that deduction would depend on our having taxable income in that later year or thereafter subject to carryforward limitations.
Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates on dividend income from regular corporations, which could adversely affect the value of our shares.
The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for dividends payable to domestic stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for these reduced rates. Although the reduced U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to dividend income from regular corporate dividends does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends paid by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our shares of common stock.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or TCJA made many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders. Pursuant to the TCJA, as of January 1, 2018, the highest marginal individual income tax rate is reduced to 37%. In addition, individuals, estates and trusts may deduct up to 20% of certain pass-through income, including ordinary REIT dividends that are not “capital gain dividends” or “qualified dividend income,” subject to complex limitations. For taxpayers qualifying for the full deduction, the effective maximum tax rate on ordinary REIT dividends would be 29.6% (through taxable years ending in 2025). The maximum rate of withholding with respect to our distributions to non-U.S. stockholders that are treated as attributable to gains from the sale or exchange of U.S. real property interests is also reduced from 35% to 21%. There can be no assurance as to how these or any other tax rate changes in the future will impact the attractiveness of an investment in our shares or the value of our securities.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could reduce the market price of our shares.
At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws or regulations governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws or regulations may be changed. We cannot predict if or when any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective or whether any such law, regulation or interpretation may take effect retroactively. We and our stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation.
The TCJA made many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to businesses, including REITs, and may lessen the relative competitive advantage of operating as a REIT rather than as a C corporation. Pursuant to the TCJA, as of January 1, 2018, the federal income tax rate applicable to corporations was reduced to 21% and the corporate alternative minimum tax was repealed. In addition, the deduction of net interest expense is limited for all businesses; provided that certain businesses, including real estate businesses, may elect not to be subject to such limitations and instead to depreciate their real property related assets over longer depreciable lives. This limitation could adversely affect our TRSs.
Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of us or our stockholders. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the impact of any legislative, regulatory or administrative developments or proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares.
REIT limitations may affect our ability to dispose of real properties we may acquire in the course of our MSR business, or in meeting our obligations under prior securitization transactions.
The provisions of the Code relating to REITs may limit our ability to sell properties at a profit without incurring unfavorable tax consequences. Generally, sales of property within two years of acquisition, and sale of multiple properties within one year, may result in the gains from such sales being subject to 100% taxation. To the extent we own real property within the REIT, we may face significant restrictions in our ability to dispose of this property.
We could incur adverse tax consequences if CYS failed to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In connection with our acquisition of CYS, we assumed, based on public filings, that CYS has qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes prior to the completion of the merger pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 25, 2018, by and among us, Eiger Merger Subsidiary LLC, or Merger Sub, and CYS pursuant to which, on July 31, 2018,

35




Merger Sub merged with and into CYS, with CYS continuing as the surviving corporation. This merger resulted in CYS becoming our indirect, wholly owned subsidiary. However, if CYS failed to qualify as a REIT, we generally would succeed to or incur significant tax liabilities (including the significant tax liability that would result from the deemed sale of assets by CYS pursuant to the merger), and we could possibly lose our REIT status should disqualifying activities continue after the acquisition.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

Item 2. Properties
We lease and/or sublease administrative office space in New York, Minnesota Florida and Massachusetts. We do not own, lease or utilize any physical properties that would be considered material to our business and operations.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, wethe Company may be involved insubject to liability under laws and government regulations and various claims and legal claims and/or administrative proceedings that ariseactions arising in the ordinary course of our business. As previously disclosed, on April 13, 2020, the Company announced that it had elected not to renew the Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers. Subsequently, on July 15, 2020, the Company provided PRCM Advisers with a notice of termination of the dateManagement Agreement for “cause” in accordance with Section 15(a) of this filing, we are not partythe Management Agreement. The Company terminated the Management Agreement for “cause” on the basis of certain material breaches and certain events of gross negligence on the part of PRCM Advisers in the performance of its duties under the Management Agreement.
On July 21, 2020, PRCM Advisers filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, or the Court. Subsequently, PRCM Advisers filed an amended complaint, or the Federal Complaint, on September 4, 2020. The Federal Complaint alleges, among other things, the misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of both the Defend Trade Secrets Act and New York common law, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition and business practices, unjust enrichment, conversion, and tortious interference with contract. The Federal Complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining the Company from making any use of or disclosing PRCM Advisers’ trade secret, proprietary, or confidential information; damages in an amount to any litigation be determined at a hearing and/or legal proceedings or,trial; disgorgement of the Company’s wrongfully obtained profits; and fees and costs incurred by PRCM Advisers in pursuing the action. On September 25, 2020, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Federal Complaint. PRCM Advisers thereafter filed an opposition to the bestmotion to dismiss on October 16, 2020, and on October 26, 2020, the Company filed its reply. On June 23, 2021, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion to dismiss. The Court dismissed PRCM Advisers’ claims challenging the termination of our knowledge, any threatened litigation or legal proceedings, which, in our opinion, individually orthe Management Agreement, including PRCM Advisers’ claims for breach of contract with respect to Sections 13(a) and 15 of the Management Agreement and for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, as well as certain of PRCM Advisers’ other claims.
On July 7, 2021, PRCM Advisers filed a motion for leave to amend the Federal Complaint for the purpose of amending certain allegations related to PRCM Advisers’ claim for breach of contract with respect to Section 15 of the Management Agreement, and the purpose of adding Pine River Domestic Management L.P. and Pine River Capital Management L.P. as plaintiffs. On July 21, 2021, the Company filed an opposition to the motion to amend, and on July 28, 2021, PRCM Advisers filed its reply. On October 18, 2021, the Court granted PRCM Advisers’ motion for leave to amend the Federal Complaint, and deemed PRCM Advisers’ second amended complaint served. On November 17, 2021, the Company filed its answer and counterclaims against PRCM Advisers and Pine River Capital Management L.P. in the aggregate, would haveCourt. On December 17, 2021, PRCM Advisers and Pine River Capital Management L.P. filed their answer to the Company’s counterclaims. The Company’s board of directors believes the Federal Complaint is without merit and that the Company has fully complied with the terms of the Management Agreement.
Separately, the staff of the SEC conducted a material adverse effectnon-public investigation in connection with the Company’s decisions not to renew its Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers on our resultsthe basis of operations or financial condition.unfair compensation payable to PRCM Advisers in accordance with Section 13(a)(ii) of the Management Agreement and to terminate its Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers for “cause” in accordance with Section 15 of the Management Agreement. The Company fully cooperated with the SEC. On January 5, 2022, the SEC informed the Company that it had concluded its investigation as to the Company and that, based on the information provided to the SEC as of such date, it did not intend to recommend any enforcement action against the Company.

24

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.


36
25




PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “TWO”. As of February 24, 2020, 273,627,2752022, 343,920,330 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding.

Holders
As of February 20, 2020,18, 2022, there were 621605 registered holders and approximately 119,567121,877 beneficial owners of our common stock.

Dividends
We have historically paid dividends on our common stock. All dividend distributions are authorized by our board of directors, in its discretion, and will depend on such items as our REIT taxable earnings,income, financial condition, maintenance of REIT status, and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. The holders of our common stock share proportionally on a per share basis in all declared dividends on our common stock. Dividends cannot be paid on our common stock unless we have paid full cumulative dividends on all classes of our preferred stock. We have paid full cumulative dividends on all classes of our preferred stock from the respective dates of issuance through December 31, 2019.2021. We intend to continue to pay quarterly dividends on our common stock and to distribute to our common stockholders as dividends 100% of our REIT taxable income,on an annual basis.
We have not established a minimum dividend distribution level for our common stock. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding the sources of funds used for dividends and for a discussion of factors, if any, which may adversely affect our ability to pay dividends in 20202022 and thereafter.
Our stock transfer agent and registrar is Equiniti Trust Company. Requests for information from Equiniti Trust Company can be sent to Equiniti Trust Company, P.O. Box 64856, St. Paul, MN 55164-0856 and their telephone number is 1-800-468-9716.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Our Second Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan wasand our 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Equity Incentive Plans, were adopted by our board of directors and approved by our stockholders for the purpose of enabling us to provide equity compensation to attract and retain qualified directors, officers, advisers, consultants and other personnel, including affiliates and personnel of PRCM Advisers and its affiliates, and any joint venture affiliates of ours.personnel. The Plan isEquity Incentive Plans are administered by the compensation committee of our board of directors and permitspermit the grantinggrants of restricted shares of common stock, restricted stock units, or RSUs, performance-based awards (including performance share units, or PSUs), phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards. For a detailed description of the Plan,Equity Incentive Plans, see Note 1817 - Equity Incentive PlanPlans of the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table presents certain information about the PlanEquity Incentive Plans as of December 31, 2019:
2021:
December 31, 20192021
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column of this table)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (1)

$
1,713,65117,428,602 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders


Total
$
1,713,65117,428,602 
___________________
(1)
For a detailed description of the Plan, see Note 18 - Equity Incentive Plan
(1)For a detailed description of the Equity Incentive Plans, see Note 17 - Equity Incentive Plans of the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


37
26




Performance Graph
The following graph compares thea stockholder’s cumulative total return, assuming $100 invested at December 31, 2014,2016, with all reinvestment of dividends, as if such amounts had been invested in: (i) our common stock; (ii) the stocks included in the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index, or S&P 500; and (iii) the stocks included in the Bloomberg REIT Mortgage Index.

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among Two Harbors Investment Corp.,
S&P 500 and Bloomberg REIT Mortgage Index

chart-3400b2ec4cc550d9943.jpgtwo-20211231_g1.jpg

December 31,
Index20212020201920182017
Two Harbors Investment Corp.$69.68 $69.62 $145.66 $113.21 $126.47 
S&P 500$233.28 $181.29 $153.13 $116.47 $121.82 
Bloomberg REIT Mortgage Index$132.08 $112.30 $144.35 $116.77 $120.27 

  December 31,
Index 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Two Harbors Investment Corp. $165.05
 $122.72
 $137.09
 $108.40
 $90.23
S&P 500 $208.05
 $132.19
 $138.26
 $113.49
 $101.37
Bloomberg REIT Mortgage Index $154.54
 $128.65
 $132.51
 $110.18
 $90.11


38




Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Our board of directors has adopted a share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an aggregate of 37,500,000 shares of our common stock. Shares may be repurchased from time to time through privately negotiated transactions or open market transactions, pursuant to a trading plan in accordance with Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Exchange Act or by any combination of such methods. The manner, price, number and timing of share repurchases are subject to a variety of factors, including market conditions and applicable SEC rules. The share repurchase program does not require the purchase of any minimum number of shares, and, subject to SEC rules, purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time without prior notice. The share repurchase program does not have an expiration date. As of December 31, 2019,2021, a total of 12,069,00012,174,300 shares had been repurchased under the program for an aggregate cost of $200.4$201.5 million. We did not repurchase shares during the three months ended December 31, 2019.2021.



39
27


Item 6. Selected Financial Data[Reserved]
Our selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the 2019 presentation. All per share amounts and common shares outstanding for all periods presented have been adjusted on a retroactive basis to reflect the one-for-two reverse stock split effected on November 1, 2017.
(in thousands)For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Interest income:         
Available-for-sale securities$962,283
 $847,325
 $631,853
 $414,050
 $458,515
Residential mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts
 
 102,886
 133,993
 95,740
Other32,407
 22,707
 10,350
 27,037
 38,624
Total interest income994,690
 870,032
 745,089
 575,080
 592,879
Interest expense:         
Repurchase agreements654,280
 469,437
 210,430
 88,850
 72,653
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts
 
 82,573
 97,729
 57,216
Federal Home Loan Bank advances10,920
 20,417
 36,911
 26,101
 11,921
Revolving credit facilities19,354
 10,820
 2,341
 604
 
Term notes payable10,708
 
 
 
 
Convertible senior notes19,067
 18,997
 17,933
 
 
Total interest expense714,329
 519,671
 350,188
 213,284
 141,790
Net interest income280,361
 350,361
 394,901
 361,796
 451,089
Other-than-temporary impairment losses(14,312) (470) (789) (1,822) (535)
Other income (loss):         
Gain (loss) on investment securities280,118
 (341,312) (34,695) (107,374) 363,379
Servicing income501,612
 343,096
 209,065
 143,579
 127,398
Loss on servicing asset(697,659) (69,033) (91,033) (83,531) (99,584)
(Loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements(108,289) 16,043
 (9,753) 45,371
 (210,621)
Gain (loss) on other derivative instruments259,998
 (54,857) (70,159) 99,379
 (5,049)
Other income (loss)337
 3,037
 30,141
 9,964
 (7,686)
Total other income (loss)236,117
 (103,026) 33,566
 107,388
 167,837
Expenses:         
Management fees60,102
 30,272
 40,472
 39,261
 49,116
Servicing expenses74,607
 61,136
 35,289
 32,119
 28,028
Securitization deal costs
 
 
 6,152
 8,971
Other operating expenses57,055
 62,983
 54,160
 56,605
 56,764
Acquisition transaction costs
 86,703
 
 
 
Restructuring charges
 8,238
 
 2,990
 
Total expenses191,764
 249,332
 129,921
 137,127
 142,879
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes310,402
 (2,467) 297,757
 330,235
 475,512
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes(13,560) 41,823
 (10,482) 12,314
 (16,560)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations323,962
 (44,290) 308,239
 317,921
 492,072
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 44,146
 35,357
 138
Net income (loss)323,962
 (44,290) 352,385
 353,278
 492,210
Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 3,814
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Two Harbors Investment Corp.323,962
 (44,290) 348,571
 353,278
 492,210
Dividends on preferred stock75,801
 65,395
 25,122
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$248,161
 $(109,685) $323,449
 $353,278
 $492,210

40


(in thousands, except share data)For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Basic earnings (loss) per weighted average share:         
Continuing operations$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.62
 $1.83
 $2.70
Discontinued operations
 
 0.23
 0.20
 
Net income (loss)$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.85
 $2.03
 $2.70
Diluted earnings (loss) per weighted average share:         
Continuing operations$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.60
 $1.83
 $2.70
Discontinued operations
 
 0.21
 0.20
 
Net income (loss)$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.81
 $2.03
 $2.70
Dividends declared per common share$1.67
 $1.88
 $2.01
 $1.86
 $2.08
Weighted average number of shares of common stock:         
Basic267,826,739
 206,020,502
 174,433,999
 174,036,852
 182,623,869
Diluted267,826,739
 206,020,502
 188,133,341
 174,036,852
 182,623,869
Comprehensive income (loss):         
Net income (loss)$323,962
 $(44,290) $352,385
 $353,278
 $492,210
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:         
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net578,583
 (233,914) 135,586
 (159,834) (496,728)
Other comprehensive income (loss)578,583
 (233,914) 135,586
 (159,834) (496,728)
Comprehensive income (loss)902,545
 (278,204) 487,971
 193,444
 (4,518)
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 3,814
 
 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Two Harbors Investment Corp.902,545
 (278,204) 484,157
 193,444
 (4,518)
Dividends on preferred stock75,801
 65,395
 25,122
 
 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$826,744
 $(343,599) $459,035
 $193,444
 $(4,518)
 At December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Available-for-sale securities$31,406,328
 $25,552,604
 $21,220,819
 $13,116,171
 $7,825,320
Mortgage servicing rights$1,909,444
 $1,993,440
 $1,086,717
 $693,815
 $493,688
Total assets$35,921,622
 $30,132,479
 $24,789,313
 $20,112,056
 $14,575,772
Repurchase agreements$29,147,463
 $23,133,476
 $8,865,184
 $8,865,184
 $4,948,926
Federal Home Loan Bank advances$210,000
 $865,024
 $1,215,024
 $4,000,000
 $3,785,000
Total stockholders’ equity$4,970,466
 $4,254,489
 $3,571,424
 $3,401,112
 $3,576,561


41


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 20192021 and 20182020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 20192021 and 2018.2020. Discussions of 20172019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 20182020 and 20172019 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2020.

General
We are a Maryland corporation focused on investing in and managing Agency residential mortgage-backed securities, or Agency RMBS, non-Agency securities, mortgage servicing rights, or MSR, and other financial assets, which we collectively refer to as our target assets. We operate as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, as defined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. We are externally managed by PRCM Advisers LLC, or PRCM Advisers, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pine River Capital Management L.P., or Pine River.
Our objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted total return to our stockholders over the long term, primarily through dividends and secondarily through capital appreciation. We selectively acquire and manage an investment portfolio of our target assets, which is constructed to generate attractive returns through market cycles. We focus on asset selection and implement a relative value investment approach across various sectors within the mortgage market. Our target assets include the following:
Agency RMBS (which includes inverse interest-only Agency securities classified as “Agency Derivatives” for purposes of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP), meaning RMBS whose principal and interest payments are guaranteed by a U.S. government agency, such as the Government National Mortgage Association (or Ginnie Mae), or a U.S. government sponsored enterprise, or GSE, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (or Fannie Mae), or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (or Freddie Mac), or collectively, the government sponsored entities, or GSEs;; and
Non-Agency securities, meaning securities that are not issued or guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac;
MSR; and
Other financial assets comprising approximately 5% to 10% of the portfolio.
We generally viewHistorically, we viewed our target assets in two strategies that arewere based on our core competencies of understanding and managing prepayment and credit risk. Our rates strategy includesincluded assets that arewere primarily sensitive to changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds, specifically Agency RMBS and MSR. Our credit strategy includesincluded assets that arewere primarily sensitive to changes in inherent credit risk, including non-Agency securities, meaning securities that are not issued or guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. In the first quarter of 2020, we experienced unprecedented market conditions as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic, including unusually significant spread widening in both Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities. Other assets include financialIn response, we focused our efforts on raising excess liquidity and mortgage-related assets other thande-risking our portfolio. On March 25, 2020, we sold substantially all of our non-Agency securities in order to eliminate the target assetsrisks posed by continued margin calls and ongoing funding concerns associated with the significant spread widening on these assets. We also sold approximately one-third of our Agency RMBS in order to reduce risk and raise cash to establish a strong defensive liquidity position to weather potential ongoing economic and market instability. Late in the first quarter of 2020, the U.S. Federal Reserve, or the Fed, committed to unlimited purchases of Agency RMBS. The Fed’s actions were successful in helping to stabilize that market; however, the resulting historic spread tightening in the first half of 2021 made investments in Agency RMBS less attractive. As a result, and in anticipation of an accelerated tapering of Fed purchases, we reduced our aggregate Agency RMBS/TBA position during the year ended December 31, 2021. In the ordinary course of business, we make investment decisions and allocate capital in accordance with our views on the changing risk/reward dynamics in the market and in our ratesportfolio. Going forward, we expect our capital to be fully allocated to our strategy of pairing Agency RMBS and credit strategies, including certain non-hedging transactionsMSR.
Our Agency RMBS portfolio is comprised primarily of fixed rate mortgage-backed securities backed by single-family and multi-family mortgage loans. All of our principal and interest Agency RMBS are Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac mortgage pass-through certificates or collateralized mortgage obligations that may produce non-qualifying income for purposescarry an implied rating of “AAA,” or Ginnie Mae mortgage pass-through certificates, which are backed by the guarantee of the REIT gross income tests.U.S. government. The majority of these securities consist of whole pools in which we own all of the investment interests in the securities.
Within our MSR business, we purchaseacquire MSR assets, which represent the right to control the servicing of residential mortgage loans and the obligation to service the loans in accordance with relevant standards, from high-quality originators. We do not directly service the mortgage loans underlying the MSR we acquire; rather, we contract with appropriately licensed third-party subservicers to handle substantially all servicing functions in the name of the subservicer.
On April 26, 2018, As the servicer of record, however, we announced that we had entered intoremain accountable to the GSEs for all servicing matters and, accordingly, provide substantial oversight of each of our subservicers. We believe MSR are a definitive merger agreement pursuantnatural fit for our portfolio over the long term. Our MSR business leverages our core competencies in prepayment and credit risk analytics and the MSR assets provide offsetting risks to which we would acquire CYS Investments, Inc., or CYS, a Maryland corporation investing in primarilyour Agency RMBS, hedging both interest rate and treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The transaction was approved by the stockholders of both Two Harbors and CYS on July 27, 2018, and the merger was completed on July 31, 2018, at which time CYS became our wholly owned subsidiary. In exchange for all of the shares of CYS common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, we issued approximately 72.6 million new shares of common stock, as well as aggregate cash consideration of $15.0 million, to CYS common stockholders. In addition, we issued 3 million shares of newly classified Series D cumulative redeemable preferred stock and 8 million shares of newly classified Series E cumulative redeemable preferred stock in exchange for all shares of CYS’s Series A and Series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock outstanding prior to the effective time of the merger. The financial results of CYS since the closing date of the acquisition have been included in our consolidated financial statements.

mortgage spread risk. 
42
28


We believe our investment model allows management to allocate capital across various sectors within the mortgage market, with a focus on asset selection and the implementation of a relative value investment approach. In making our capital allocation decisions, we take into consideration a number of factors, including the opportunities available in the marketplace, the cost and availability of financing, and the cost of hedging interest rate, prepayment, credit and other portfolio risks. As a result, capital allocation reflects management’s flexible approachWe have expertise in mortgage credit and may choose to investinginvest again in those assets should the marketplace. The following table provides our capital allocation in each of our investment strategies as of December 31, 2019 and the four immediately preceding quarter-ends:opportunity arise.
 
Capital Allocations(1) as of
 December 31,
2019
 September 30,
2019
 June 30,
2019
 March 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Rates strategy78% 79% 76% 77% 74%
Credit strategy22% 21% 24% 23% 26%
____________________
(1)Capital allocation percentages reflect management’s assessment regarding the extent to which each asset class contributes to total portfolio risk. Does not represent funding allocation or balance sheet financing of such assets.

As our capital allocation shifts, our annualized yields and cost of financing will also shift. At December 31, 2019, our capital allocation was 78% to our rates strategy and 22% to our credit strategy. Going forward, we intend to allocate capital to the most attractive investment opportunities in our target asset classes. We do not have a fixed allocation target between our rates and credit strategies. Our investment decisions are not driven solely by annualized yields, but rather a multitude of macroeconomic drivers, including market environments and their respective impacts (e.g., uncertainty of prepayment speeds, extension risk and credit events).
For the three months ended December 31, 2019,2021, our net yieldspread realized on the portfolio was slightly higher than recent quarters due primarily to higher MSR servicing income, net of estimated amortization, offset by higher servicing expenses. Additionally, our higher yielding MSR now make up a larger proportion of our total portfolio due to prepayments and sales of Agency RMBS. Cost of financing for the three months ended December 31, 2021 was lower than the prior quarter, but lower than recent periodstwo quarters due to purchases of lower coupon/sales of higher coupon Agency RMBS and higher prepays on Agency RMBS, offset by a decreasean increase in our cost of financing due to decreases in LIBOR.interest rate swap spread income. The following table provides the average annualized yield on our assets including Agency RMBS, non-Agency securities and MSR for the three months ended December 31, 2019,2021, and the four immediately preceding quarters:
Three Months EndedThree Months Ended
December 31,
2019
 September 30,
2019
 June 30,
2019
 March 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
December 31,
2021
September 30,
2021
June 30,
2021
March 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Average annualized portfolio yield (1)
3.54% 3.67% 3.93% 4.25% 4.14%
Average annualized portfolio yield (1)
3.72%3.33%2.72%2.25%2.26%
Cost of financing (2)
2.35% 2.51% 2.55% 2.47% 2.53%
Cost of financing (2)
0.73%0.78%0.79%0.60%0.50%
Net portfolio yield1.19% 1.16% 1.38% 1.78% 1.61%
Net spreadNet spread2.99%2.55%1.93%1.65%1.76%
____________________
(1)Average annualized yield includes interest income on Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities and servicing income, net of amortization and servicing expenses on MSR and incorporates future prepayment, credit loss and other assumptions, all of which are estimates and subject to change.
(2)Cost of financing includes swap and cap interest rate spread.
(1)Average annualized yield includes interest income on Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities and MSR servicing income, net of estimated amortization, and servicing expenses.
(2)Cost of financing includes swap interest rate spread and amortization of upfront payments made or received upon entering.

We seek to deploy moderate leverage as part of our investment strategy. We generally finance our Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities through short- and long-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, or the FHLB.agreements. We also finance our MSR through repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities, repurchase agreements, term notes payable and convertible senior notes.

43




Our Agency RMBS, given their liquidity and high credit quality, are eligible for higher levels of leverage, while non-Agency securities and MSR, with less liquidity and/or more exposure to credit risk and prepayment, utilize lower levels of leverage. As a result, our debt-to-equity ratio is determined by our portfolio mix as well as many additional factors, including the liquidity of our portfolio, the availability and price of our financing, the diversification of our counterparties and their available capacity to finance our assets, and anticipated regulatory developments. Over the past several quarters, we have generally maintained a debt-to-equity ratio range of 5.0 to 6.0 times to finance our securities portfolio and MSR, on a fully deployed capital basis. Our debt-to-equity ratio is also directly correlated to the composition of our portfolio; specifically, the higher percentage of Agency RMBS we hold, the higher our debt-to-equity ratio is, while the higher percentage of non-Agency securities and MSR we hold, the lower our debt-to-equity ratio is. We may alter the percentage allocation of our portfolio among our target assets depending on the relative value of the assets that are available to purchase from time to time, including at times when we are deploying proceeds from offerings we conduct. As we allocate capital toward Agency RMBS and deploy financing on MSR, our debt-to-equity ratio may increase beyond 6.0 times in the future. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition - Repurchase AgreementsFinancing” for further discussion.
We recognize that investing in our target assets is competitive and we compete with other entities for attractive investment opportunities. We rely on our management team and our dedicated team of investment professionals provided by our external manager to identify investment opportunities. We believe that our significant focus in the residential market, the extensive mortgage market expertise of our investment team, our operational capabilities to invest in MSR, our strong analytics and our disciplined relative value investment approach give us a competitive advantage versus our peers.
We have elected to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To qualify as a REIT we are required to meet certain investment and operating tests and annual distribution requirements. We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income to the extent that we annually distribute all of our net taxable income to stockholders, do not participate in prohibited transactions and maintain our intended qualification as a REIT. However, certain activities that we may perform may cause us to earn income which will not be qualifying income for REIT purposes. We have designated certain of our subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, as defined in the Code, to engage in such activities. We also operate our business in a manner that will permit us to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act. While we do not currently originate or directly service residential mortgage loans, certain of our subsidiaries have obtained the requisite licenses and approvals to own and manage MSR.

Through August 14, 2020, we were externally managed and advised by PRCM Advisers LLC, a subsidiary of Pine River Capital Management L.P., under the terms of a Management Agreement between us and PRCM Advisers. We terminated the Management Agreement effective August 14, 2020 for “cause” in accordance with Section 15(a) thereof. On August 15, 2020, we completed our transition to self-management and directly hired the senior management team and other personnel who had historically provided services to us.

29

Factors Affecting our Operating Results
Our net interest income includes income from our securities portfolio, including the amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of purchase discounts. Net interest income, as well as our servicing income, net of subservicing expenses, will fluctuate primarily as a result of changes in market interest rates, our financing costs and prepayment speeds on our assets. Interest rates, financing costs and prepayment rates vary according to the type of investment, conditions in the financial markets, competition and other factors, none of which can be predicted with any certainty. Our operating results will also be affected by default rates
On January 1, 2020 we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which changed the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. Valuation allowances for credit losses with respecton available-for-sale, or AFS, debt securities are recognized, rather than direct reductions in the amortized cost of the investments, regardless of whether the impairment is considered to be other-than-temporary. We use a discounted cash flow method to estimate and recognize an allowance for credit losses on AFS securities, as detailed in Note 2 to the mortgage loans underlying our non-Agency securities.consolidated financial statements, included under Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Fair Value Measurement
A significant portion of our assets and liabilities are reported at fair value and, therefore, our consolidated balance sheets and statements of comprehensive (loss) income (loss) are significantly affected by fluctuations in market prices. At December 31, 2019,2021, approximately 93.3%77.9% of our total assets, or $33.5$9.4 billion,, consisted of financial instruments recorded at fair value. See Note 10 - Fair Value to the consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for descriptions of valuation methodologies used to measure material assets and liabilities at fair value and details of the valuation models, key inputs to those models and significant assumptions utilized. Although we execute various hedging strategies to mitigate our exposure to changes in fair value, we cannot fully eliminate our exposure to volatility caused by fluctuations in market prices.
Any temporary change in the fair value of our available-for-sale, or AFS securities, excluding certain Agency interest-only mortgage-backed securities, is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and does not impact our earnings. Our reported earningsincome (loss) for U.S. GAAP purposes, or GAAP net income (loss). However, beginning on January 1, 2020 (as discussed above), changes in the provision for credit losses on AFS securities are recognized immediately in GAAP net income (loss). Our GAAP net income (loss) is also affected however, by fluctuations in market prices on the remainder of our financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, including interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements and certain other derivative instruments (i.e., TBAs, put and call options for TBAs, U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures, Markit IOS total return swaps and inverse interest-only securities), which are accounted for as derivative trading instruments under U.S. GAAP, Agencycertain interest-only mortgage-backed securities and MSR.

44




We have numerous internal controls in place to help ensure the appropriateness of fair value measurements. Significant fair value measures are subject to detailed analytics and management review and approval. Our entire investment portfolio reported at fair value is priced by third-party brokers and/or by independent pricing vendors. We generally receive three or more broker and vendor quotes on pass-through principal and interest (P&I) Agency RMBS, and generally receive multiple broker or vendor quotes on all other securities, including interest-only Agency RMBS and inverse interest-only Agency RMBS, and non-Agency securities.RMBS. We also receive three vendor quotes for the MSR in our investment portfolio. For Agency RMBS, the third-party pricing vendors and brokers use pricing models that commonly incorporate such factors as coupons, primary and secondary mortgage rates, rate reset periods, issuer, prepayment speeds, credit enhancements and expected life of the security. For non-Agency securities, the third-party pricing vendors utilize both observable and unobservable inputs such as pool-specific characteristics (e.g., loan age, loan size, credit quality of borrowers, vintage, servicer quality), floating rate indices, prepayment and default assumptions, and recent trading of the same or similar securities. For MSR, vendors use pricing models that generally incorporate observable inputs such as principal balance, note rate, geographical location, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, FICO, appraised value and other loan characteristics, along with observed market yields and trading levels. Pricing vendors will customarily incorporate loan servicing cost, servicing fee, ancillary income, and earnings rate on escrow as observable inputs. Unobservable or model-driven inputs include forecast cumulative defaults, default curve, forecast loss severity and forecast voluntary prepayment.
We evaluate the prices we receive from both third-party brokers and pricing vendors by comparing those prices to actual purchase and sale transactions, our internally modeled prices calculated based on market observable rates and credit spreads, and to each other both in current and prior periods. We review and may challenge valuations from third-party brokers and pricing vendors to ensure that such quotes and valuations are indicative of fair value as a result of this analysis. We then estimate the fair value of each security based upon the median of the final broker quotes received, and we estimate the fair value of MSR based upon the average of prices received from third-party vendors, subject to internally-established hierarchy and override procedures.
We utilize “bid side” pricing for our Agency RMBS and, non-Agency securities and, as a result, certain assets, especially the most recent purchases, may realize a markdown due to the “bid-offer” spread. To the extent that this occurs, any economic effect of this would be reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income.
30

Considerable judgment is used in forming conclusions and estimating inputs to our Level 3 fair value measurements. Level 3 inputs such as interest rate movements, prepayments speeds, credit losses and discount rates are inherently difficult to estimate. Changes to these inputs can have a significant effect on fair value measurements. Accordingly, there is no assurance that our estimates of fair value are indicative of the amounts that would be realized on the ultimate sale or exchange of these assets. The Company classified 6.0%At December 31, 2021, 18.2% of itsour total assets were classified as Level 3 fair value assets at December 31, 2019.assets.

Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to make certain judgments and assumptions, based on information available at the time of our preparation of the financial statements, in determining accounting estimates used in preparation of the statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, included under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Accounting estimates are considered critical if the estimate requires us to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made and if different estimates reasonably could have been used in the reporting period or changes in the accounting estimate are reasonably likely to occur from period to period that would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, included under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our most critical accounting policies involve our fair valuation of AFS securities, MSR and derivative instruments.
The methods used by us to estimate fair value for AFS securities, MSR and MSRderivative instruments may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while we believe that our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. We use inputs that areprices obtained from third-party pricing vendors or broker quotes deemed indicative of market activity and current as of the measurement date, which in periods of market dislocation, may have reduced transparency.
Classification and Valuation of Available-for-Sale Securities
Our securities investments consist primarily of Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities that we classify as available-for-sale, or AFS. All assets classified as AFS, excluding certain Agency interest-only mortgage-backed securities, are reported at estimated For more information on our fair value with changes in fair value included in accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity, on an after-tax basis. On July 1, 2015, we elected the fair value option for Agency interest-only securities acquired on or after such date. All Agency interest-only securities acquired on or after July 1, 2015 are carried at estimated fair value with changes in fair value recorded as a component of gain (loss) on investment securities inmeasurements, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, included under Item 8 of comprehensive income (loss).

45




When the estimated fair value of an AFS security is less than amortized cost, we consider whether there is an other-than-temporary impairment in the value of the security that is required to be recognized in GAAP net income (loss). The determination of whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired involves judgments and assumptions based on subjective and objective factors. Consideration is given to whether we (i) have the intent to sell the investment securities, (ii) are more likely than not to be required to sell the investment securities before recovery, or (iii) do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the investment securities. Investments with unrealized losses are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired if we have the ability and intent to hold the investments for a period of time, to maturity if necessary, sufficient for a forecasted market price recovery up to or beyond the amortized cost basis of the investments. If an impairment is determined to be solely driven by the inability to fully recover the entire amortized cost basis over the remaining life of the security, the security is further analyzed for credit loss (the difference between the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis). The credit loss, if any, is then recognized in GAAP net income (loss), while the balance of impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).
Classification and Valuation of Mortgage Servicing Rights
We account for our MSR at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in GAAP net income (loss), rather than at amortized cost. Fair value is generally determined based on prices obtained from third-party pricing vendors. Although MSR transactions are observable in the marketplace, the details of those transactions are not necessarily reflective of the value of our MSR portfolio. Third-party vendors use both observable market data and unobservable market data (including prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, discount rates and cost to service) as inputs into models, which help to inform their best estimates of fair value market price. 
Interest Income Recognition
Our interest income on our Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities is accrued based on the actual coupon rate and the outstanding principal balance of such securities. Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted into interest income over the lives of the securities using the effective yield method, as adjusted for actual prepayments. We estimate prepayments for our Agency interest-only securities, which represent our right to receive a specified portion of the contractual interest flows of specific Agency and collateralized mortgage obligations, or CMO, securities. As a result, if prepayments increase (or are expected to increase), we will accelerate the rate of amortization on the premiums. Conversely, if prepayments decrease (or are expected to decrease), we will decelerate the rate of amortization on the premiums.
Our interest income on our non-Agency securities rated below AA, including unrated securities, is recognized in accordance with estimated cash flows. Cash flows from a security are estimated by applying assumptions used to determine the fair value of such security and the excess of the future cash flows over the investmentMSR to immediate adverse changes in these assumptions are recognized as interest income under the effective yield method. We review and, if appropriate, make adjustments to our cash flow projections at least quarterly and monitor these projections based on input and analysis received from external sources, internal models, and our judgment about interest rates, prepayment rates, the timing and amount of credit losses, and other factors. Changespresented in cash flows from those originally projected, or from those estimated at the last evaluation, may result in a prospective change in interest income recognized on, or the carrying value of, such securities.
For non-Agency securities purchased at a discount, we account for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from our initial investment in debt securities acquired if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. We limit the yield that may be accreted (accretable yield)Note 5 to the excessconsolidated financial statements, included under Item 8 of an estimate of undiscounted expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (cash flows expected at acquisition to be collected) over the initial investment. The excess of contractual cash flows over cash flows expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference or designated credit reserve) is not recognized as an adjustment of yield, loss accrual, or valuation allowance. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected is recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield over the remaining life of the security. Decreases in cash flows expected to be collected are recognized as impairments.this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
We apply the provisions of ASC 815, which requires the recognition of all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets and to measure those instruments at fair value. The fair value adjustments of our current derivative instruments affect net income as the hedge for accounting purposes is being treated as an economic, or trading, hedge and not as a qualifying hedging instrument.
Derivatives are primarily used for hedging purposes rather than speculation. We utilize third-party pricing vendors and broker quotes to value our financial derivative instruments. If our hedging activities do not achieve their desired results, our reported GAAP net income (loss) may be adversely affected.

46




Income Taxes
Our financial results are generally not expected to reflect provisions for current or deferred income taxes, except for those taxable benefits or provisions recognized by our TRSs. We estimate, based on existence of sufficient evidence, the ability to realize the remainder of any deferred tax asset our TRSs recognize. Any adjustments to such estimates will be made in the period such determination is made. We plan to operate in a manner that will allow us to qualify for taxation as a REIT. As a result of our expected REIT qualification, we do not generally expect to pay U.S. federal corporate level taxes. However, many of the REIT requirements are highly technical and complex. If we were to fail to meet the REIT requirements, we would be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) significantly changed how the U.S. taxes corporations. The TCJA requires complex computations to be performed that were not previously required in U.S. tax law, significant judgments to be made in interpretation of the provisions of the TCJA and significant estimates in calculations, and the preparation and analysis of information not previously relevant or regularly produced. Technical corrections or other amendments of the TCJA or administrative guidance interpreting the TCJA may be forthcoming at any time. While we do not anticipate a material effect on our operations, we continue to analyze and monitor the application of the TCJA to our business, our peers and the economic environment.

Market Conditions and Outlook
2019 delivered a significant dropThe pace of U.S. economic growth picked up in interest rates across the curve. In addition, the Federal Reserve, or Fed, cut interest rates three times during the year, moving from a stance of patience and neutrality to one more concerned with sustaining economic expansion. Worries about a global slowdown in GDP growth and the effect of trade wars were present throughout the year, and realized and implied volatilities increased sharply. Primary mortgage rates also moved lower, which had multiple effects on Agency RMBS including increased prepayment expectations and current coupon spread widening. At the same time, higher coupon RMBS performed well, as did prepay-protected securities.
The repo markets made headlines during the last half of the year. In response to the spike in overnight rates in September, the Fed established a series of term and overnight repo operations, and also began a series of Treasury bill purchases to rebuild its balance sheet and add reserves to the system. While rates remained elevated during the fourth quarter of 2019,2021, accelerating to a 6.9% annualized rate while full year GDP growth of 5.5% was the highest in nearly four decades. The labor market remains very tight with the unemployment rate hovering at approximately 4.0% and other metrics such as job openings and quits remaining near record highs. There are signs of overheating as inflation has also reached multi-decade highs. During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Fed moved away from its stance that current inflation will be transitory and began taking steps to remove monetary accommodations to combat persistently high inflation. Expectations regarding the timeline for interest rate hikes by the Fed have accelerated, with the market now pricing in five hikes in 2022 compared to only one at the beginning of the fourth quarter.
RMBS funding has been stable although term funding rates moved quickly towards the end of 2021 as the market priced in faster Fed hikes. RMBS repo measured as a spread to the Fed Funds rate remained very tight at around 10 basis points, showing that markets remain deep and relatively inexpensive. The Fed’s overnight reverse repo facility remained elevated throughout the fourth quarter of 2021 and hit another all-time high at year end at $1.9 trillion.
Demand for mortgages remained strong through the end of 2021 but materially worsened in January 2022 as the market priced in a more accelerated reduction of the Fed’s actions clearly stabilized the market. This was on display on the final daybalance sheet. Many analysts are projecting a record amount of the year, when overnight repo rates cleared below the Fed’s target,supply for private markets which is highly unusual. Given the Fed’s strong response, our expectation is that the funding markets will normalize over time.
In mortgage credit, home price appreciation has remained solid with around 3-4% growth year-over-year, and expectations are for continued slow but increasing home prices. We believe that increasing housing affordability canmay be a significant driver of total return performanceheadwind for our legacy assets. While 10-year Treasury rates have fluctuatedmortgages in a 200 basis point range since 2014, the effects of mortgagecoming year. However, with both higher rates and income growth have conspiredwider mortgage spreads, prepayments are expected to keep overall affordability inslow considerably, which will benefit both MSR and higher coupon RMBS.
This environment, with prepayment speeds beginning to slow and current coupon mortgage spreads widening, is one for which our portfolio strategy was designed. As a narrow range.
We believe our blended Agencyresult, we are very constructive and non-Agency securities portfoliooptimistic about the forward outlook for Two Harbors and our investing expertise, as well as our operational capabilities to invest inpaired Agency RMBS and MSR will allow us to better navigate the dynamic mortgage market while future regulatory and policy activities take shape. Having a diversified portfolio allows us to mitigate a variety of risks, including interest rate and RMBS spread volatility.









47




construction.
The following table provides the carrying value of our investment portfolio by product type:
(dollars in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Agency RMBS$7,149,399 76.1 %$14,637,891 89.7 %
Mortgage servicing rights2,191,578 23.3 %1,596,153 9.8 %
Agency Derivatives40,911 0.5 %61,617 0.4 %
Non-Agency securities12,304 0.1 %13,031 0.1 %
Total$9,394,192 $16,308,692 
31

(dollars in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Agency       
Fixed Rate$27,763,471
 83.2% $21,665,960
 78.5%
Hybrid ARM14,584
 % 19,073
 0.1%
Total Agency27,778,055
 83.2% 21,685,033
 78.6%
Agency Derivatives68,925
 0.2% 70,257
 0.2%
Non-Agency       
Senior3,073,098
 9.2% 2,854,731
 10.3%
Mezzanine480,765
 1.5% 928,632
 3.4%
Interest-only securities74,410
 0.2% 84,208
 0.3%
Total Non-Agency3,628,273
 10.9% 3,867,571
 14.0%
Mortgage servicing rights1,909,444
 5.7% 1,993,440
 7.2%
Total$33,384,697
   $27,616,301
  

Prepayment speeds and volatility due to interest rates
Our Agency RMBS portfolio is subject to inherentmarket risks, primarily interest rate risk and prepayment risk. We seek to offset a portion of our Agency pool market value exposure to prepayment speeds through our MSR and interest-only Agency RMBS portfolios. Generally, a decline inDuring periods of decreasing interest rates that leads towith rising prepayment speeds, will cause the market value of our RMBS purchased at a discount (includingAgency pools generally increases and the market value of our interest-only securities)securities and MSR to deteriorate, and our RMBS purchased at a premium to increase.generally decreases. The inverse relationship occurs when interest rates increaserise and prepayments slow. The low interest rate environment isfall. Interest rates moved lower throughout the first nine months of 2021, but retraced higher in the fourth quarter of 2021. Looking forward, prepayment speeds are expected to persistslow with both rising rates and the recent refinance activity that has lowered mortgage rates overall. In addition to changes in the near term. However,interest rates, changes in home price performance, key employment metrics and government programs, among other macroeconomic factors, could causecan affect prepayment speeds to increase on many RMBS, which could lead to less attractive reinvestment opportunities. Nonetheless, wespeeds. We believe our portfolio management approach, including our asset selection process, positions us to respond to a variety of market scenarios, including an overall faster prepayment environment.
The following table provides the three-month weighted average constant prepayment rate, or CPR, on our investment portfolio by type for the three months ended December 31, 2019, and the four immediately preceding quarters:
  Three Months Ended
Weighted Average CPR December 31,
2019
 September 30,
2019
 June 30,
2019
 March 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Agency RMBS 14.3% 13.4% 10.1% 6.5% 6.8%
Non-Agency securities 6.4% 5.9% 5.3% 4.9% 5.1%
Mortgage servicing rights 20.8% 20.5% 13.7% 7.7% 7.3%

scenarios. Although we are unable to predict the movement infuture interest rates in 2020rate movements, our strategy of pairing Agency RMBS with MSR, with a focus on managing various associated risks, including interest rate, prepayment, credit, mortgage spread and beyond, our diversified portfolio management strategyfinancing risk, is intended to generate attractive yields with a low level of sensitivity to changes in the yield curve, prepayments and interest rate cycles.
The following table provides the three-month average constant prepayment rate, or CPR, experienced by our Agency RMBS and MSR during the three months ended December 31, 2021, and the four immediately preceding quarters:
Three Months Ended
December 31,
2021
September 30,
2021
June 30,
2021
March 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Agency RMBS27.7 %30.1 %32.3 %30.8 %27.0 %
Mortgage servicing rights22.1 %26.7 %29.0 %37.7 %41.2 %

Our Agency RMBS are primarily collateralized by pools of fixed-rate mortgage loans and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans, or hybrid ARMs, which are mortgage loans that have interest rates that are fixed for an initial period and adjustable thereafter.loans. Our Agency portfolio also includes securities with implicit or explicit prepayment protection, including lower loan balances (securities collateralized by loans of less than $200,000 in initial principal balance), higher LTVs (securities collateralized by loans with LTVs greater than or equal to 80%), certain geographic concentrations, loans secured by investor-owned properties and lower FICO scores. Our overall allocation of Agency RMBS and holdings of pools with specific characteristics are viewed in the context of our aggregate rates strategy, including MSR and related derivative hedging instruments. Additionally, the selection of securities with certain attributes is driven by the perceived relative value of the securities, which factors in the opportunities in the marketplace, the cost of financing and the cost of hedging interest rate, prepayment, credit and other portfolio risks. As a result, Agency RMBS capital allocation reflects management’s flexible approach to investing in the marketplace.

48




The following tables provide the carrying value of our Agency RMBS portfolio by underlying mortgage loan rate type:
December 31, 2019December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands)Principal/ Current Face Carrying Value % of Agency Portfolio Weighted Average CPR % Prepayment Protected Gross Weighted Average Coupon Rate Amortized Cost Weighted Average Loan Age (months)(dollars in thousands)Principal/ Current FaceCarrying Value
Weighted Average CPR (1)
% Prepayment ProtectedGross Weighted Average Coupon RateAmortized CostAllowance for Credit LossesWeighted Average Loan Age (months)
Agency RMBS AFS:               Agency RMBS AFS:
30-Year Fixed               30-Year Fixed
≤ 2.5%≤ 2.5%$1,243,928 $1,271,382 5.9 %— %3.3 %$1,272,323 $— 3
3.0%$6,034,075
 $6,168,095
 22.1% 3.3% 98.3% 3.8% $6,169,224
 3
3.0%1,316,662 1,384,176 9.6 %100.0 %3.7 %1,381,936 — 
3.5%6,174,872
 6,451,660
 23.2% 7.0% 100.0% 4.3% 6,386,051
 7
3.5%739,922 789,499 27.3 %100.0 %4.2 %769,989 — 29 
4.0%8,455,585
 8,993,011
 32.3% 19.4% 100.0% 4.6% 8,808,458
 25
4.0%1,421,793 1,543,595 26.5 %100.0 %4.6 %1,478,444 — 49 
4.5%4,714,844
 5,082,166
 18.3% 25.2% 100.0% 5.0% 4,942,234
 20
4.5%1,307,504 1,435,877 27.7 %100.0 %5.0 %1,373,076 — 47 
≥ 5%741,000
 813,503
 2.9% 23.5% 100.0% 5.8% 786,727
 48
≥ 5.0%≥ 5.0%325,485 361,746 37.6 %98.0 %5.9 %344,543 — 84 
26,120,376
 27,508,435
 98.8% 14.4% 99.6% 4.5% 27,092,694
 16
6,355,294 6,786,275 20.5 %81.2 %4.3 %6,620,311 — 31 
Other P&I119,168
 133,436
 0.5% 7.3% 0.3% 6.7% 133,174
 210
Other P&I56,069 62,228 53.9 %— %6.5 %61,739 — 224 
Interest-only2,601,693
 136,184
 0.5% 10.9% % 4.4% 169,811
 104
Interest-only3,198,447 300,896 20.2 %— %3.6 %305,577 (12,851)47 
Agency Derivatives397,137
 68,925
 0.2% 12.3% % 6.7% 56,959
 184
Agency Derivatives247,101 40,911 18.6 %— %6.7 %33,237 — 206 
Total Agency RMBS$29,238,374
 $27,846,980
 100.0%   98.4%   $27,452,638
  Total Agency RMBS$9,856,911 $7,190,310 76.6 %$7,020,864 $(12,851)
32
 December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)Principal/ Current Face Carrying Value % of Agency Portfolio Weighted Average CPR % Prepayment Protected Gross Weighted Average Coupon Rate Amortized Cost Weighted Average Loan Age (months)
Agency RMBS AFS:               
30-Year Fixed               
3.0%$3,255
 $3,200
 % 2.0% 100.0% 3.6% $3,314
 47
3.5%231,068
 231,321
 1.1% 6.6% 100.0% 4.1% 232,200
 19
4.0%8,640,859
 8,846,367
 40.7% 7.2% 83.0% 4.4% 9,047,282
 22
4.5%10,237,108
 10,686,699
 49.1% 6.3% 99.0% 5.0% 10,765,144
 16
≥ 5%1,367,700
 1,452,170
 6.7% 7.1% 74.4% 5.8% 1,449,256
 24
 20,479,990
 21,219,757
 97.6% 6.7% 90.7% 4.8% 21,497,196
 19
Other P&I295,800
 289,860
 1.3% 9.6% 0.3% 5.7% 291,290
 151
Interest-only3,115,967
 175,416
 0.8% 9.3% % 4.5% 209,901
 92
Agency Derivatives476,299
 70,257
 0.3% 11.9% % 6.7% 69,496
 173
Total Agency RMBS$24,368,056
 $21,755,290
 100.0%   88.4%   $22,067,883
  

Our non-Agency securities yields are expected to increase if prepayment rates on such assets exceed our prepayment assumptions. To the extent that prepayment speeds increase due to macroeconomic factors, we expect to benefit from the ability to recognize the income from the heavily discounted prices that principally arose from credit or payment default expectations.

49


December 31, 2020
(dollars in thousands)Principal/ Current FaceCarrying ValueWeighted Average CPR% Prepayment ProtectedGross Weighted Average Coupon RateAmortized CostAllowance for Credit LossesWeighted Average Loan Age (months)
Agency RMBS AFS:
30-Year Fixed
≤ 2.5%$1,878,319 $2,005,269 7.7 %100.0 %3.4 %$1,977,388 $— 
3.0%2,359,772 2,541,676 19.3 %100.0 %3.7 %2,433,757 — 14 
3.5%3,327,048 3,636,988 28.5 %100.0 %4.2 %3,485,035 — 17 
4.0%2,642,730 2,911,556 37.5 %100.0 %4.6 %2,751,139 — 36 
4.5%2,276,487 2,538,418 34.3 %100.0 %5.0 %2,400,043 — 35 
≥ 5.0%519,976 590,044 33.6 %98.4 %5.8 %551,230 — 65 
13,004,332 14,223,951 27.4 %99.9 %4.3 %13,598,592 — 24 
Other P&I99,023 113,302 9.6 %— %6.6 %110,002 — 226 
Interest-only3,649,556 300,638 14.0 %— %3.5 %315,876 (17,889)48 
Agency Derivatives318,162 61,617 16.5 %— %6.7 %45,618 — 195 
Total Agency RMBS$17,071,073 $14,699,508 96.7 %$14,070,088 $(17,889)
____________________
(1)Weighted average actual 1-month annualized CPR released at the beginning of the following month based on RMBS held as of the preceding month-end.

We believe MSR are a natural fit for our portfolio over the long term. Our MSR business leverages our core competencies in prepayment and credit risk analytics and the MSR assets provide offsetting risk to our Agency RMBS, hedging both interest rate and mortgage spread risk. The following tables provide net unamortized discount/premium information on our non-Agency securities portfolio:
 December 31, 2019
(in thousands)Principal/ Current Face Un-amortized Premium Accretable Purchase Discount Credit Reserve Purchase Discount Amortized Cost
Principal and interest securities         
Senior$4,861,854
 $8,966
 $(445,566) $(1,594,480) $2,830,774
Mezzanine636,800
 14
 (114,574) (117,471) 404,769
Total P&I securities5,498,654
 8,980
 (560,140) (1,711,951) 3,235,543
Interest-only4,356,603
 79,935
 
 
 79,935
Total Non-Agency$9,855,257
 $88,915
 $(560,140) $(1,711,951) $3,315,478
 December 31, 2018
(in thousands)Principal/ Current Face Un-amortized Premium Accretable Purchase Discount Credit Reserve Purchase Discount Amortized Cost
Principal and interest securities         
Senior$4,227,631
 $5,381
 $(477,682) $(1,204,325) $2,551,005
Mezzanine1,132,493
 1,301
 (216,437) (118,437) 798,920
Total P&I securities5,360,124
 6,682
 (694,119) (1,322,762) 3,349,925
Interest-only5,137,169
 83,846
 
 
 83,846
Total Non-Agency$10,497,293
 $90,528
 $(694,119) $(1,322,762) $3,433,771

Credit losses
Although our Agency portfolio is supported by U.S. government agency and federally chartered corporation guarantees of payment of principal and interest, we are exposed to credit risk in our non-Agency securities.
The credit support built into non-Agency securities deal structures is designed to provide a level of protection from potential credit losses for more senior tranches. We evaluate credit risk on our non-Agency investments through a comprehensive asset selection process, which is predominantly focused on quantifying and pricing credit risk, including extensive initial modeling and scenario analysis. In addition, the discounted purchase prices paid for our non-Agency securities provide additional insulation from credit losses in the event we receive less than 100% of par on such assets. At purchase, we estimate the portion of the discount we do not expect to recover and factor that into our expected yield and accretion methodology. We may also record an other-than-temporary impairment, or OTTI, for a portion of our investment in a securitytable summarizes activity related to the extent we believe thatunpaid principal balance, or UPB, of loans underlying our MSR portfolio for the amortized cost exceedsthree months ended December 31, 2021, and the present value of expected future cash flows. We review our non-Agency securities on an ongoing basis using quantitative and qualitative analysis of the risk-adjusted returns on such investments and through on-going asset surveillance. Nevertheless, unanticipated credit losses could occur, adversely impacting our operating results.four immediately preceding quarters:
Three Months Ended
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
September 30,
2021
June 30,
2021
March 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
UPB at beginning of period$194,393,942 $185,209,738 $179,014,244 $177,861,483 $156,444,362 
Purchases of mortgage servicing rights13,562,240 29,347,318 22,983,402 22,389,501 43,363,541 
Sales of mortgage servicing rights9,065 (3,633,709)— — (33,232)
Scheduled payments(1,441,835)(1,407,996)(1,283,474)(1,233,382)(1,161,019)
Prepaid(11,966,741)(14,564,141)(15,119,403)(20,337,506)(21,562,076)
Other changes(786,105)(557,268)(385,031)334,148 809,907 
UPB at end of period$193,770,566 $194,393,942 $185,209,738 $179,014,244 $177,861,483 

Counterparty exposure and leverage ratio
We monitor counterparty exposure in our broker, banking and lending counterparties on a daily basis. We believe our broker and banking counterparties are well-capitalized organizations, and we attempt to manage our cash balances across these organizations to reduce our exposure to any single counterparty.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had entered into repurchase agreements with 4739 counterparties, 2420 of which had outstanding balances at December 31, 2019.2021. In addition, we held long-term secured advances from the FHLB, short- and long-term borrowings under revolving credit facilities, long-term term notes payable and short- and long-term unsecured convertible senior notes. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the debt-to-equity ratio funding our AFS securities, MSR and Agency Derivatives, which includes unsecured borrowings under convertible senior notes, was 6.1:3.2:1.0.

50
33


As of December 31, 2019,2021, we held $558.1 million$1.2 billion in cash and cash equivalents, approximately $1.3$141.7 million of unpledged Agency securities and derivatives and $1.6 billion$11.9 million of unpledged non-Agency securities. As a result, we had an overall estimated unused borrowing capacity on our unpledged securities of approximately $1.2 billion.$133.5 million. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we held approximately $354.6$60.8 million of unpledged MSR.MSR and $96.8 million of unpledged servicing advances. Overall, we had unused committed borrowing capacity on MSR asset and servicing advance financing facilities of $1.2 billion.$313.4 million and $180.8 million, respectively. Generally, unused borrowing capacity may be the result of our election not to utilize certain financing, as well as delays in the timing in which funding is provided, insufficient collateral or the inability to meet lenders’ eligibility requirements for specific types of asset classes. If borrowing rates and collateral requirements change in the near term, we believe we are subject to less earnings volatility than if we carried higher leverage.
We also monitor exposure to our MSR counterparties. We may be required to make representations and warranties to investors in the loans underlying the MSR we own; however, some of our MSR were purchased on a bifurcated basis, meaning the representation and warranty obligations remain with the seller. If the representations and warranties we make prove to be inaccurate, we may be obligated to repurchase certain mortgage loans, which may impact the profitability of our portfolio. Although we obtain similar representations and warranties from the counterparty from which we acquired the relevant asset, if those representations and warranties do not directly mirror those we make to the investor, or if we are unable to enforce the representations and warranties against the counterparty for a variety of reasons, including the financial condition or insolvency of the counterparty, we may not be able to seek indemnification from our counterparties for any losses attributable to the breach.
Proposed changes to LIBOR transition
LIBOR ishas been used extensively in the U.S. and globally as a “benchmark” or “reference rate” for various commercial and financial contracts, including corporate and municipal bonds and loans, floating rate mortgages, asset-backed securities, consumer loans, and interest rate swaps and other derivatives. It is expectedOn March 5, 2021, Intercontinental Exchange Inc. announced that a numberICE Benchmark Administration Limited, the administrator of private-sector banks currently reporting information used to set LIBOR, will stop doing so after 2021 when their current reporting commitment ends, which could either cause LIBORintends to stop publication immediately or cause LIBOR’s regulator to determine that its quality has degraded toof the degree that it is no longer representativemajority of its underlying market. The U.S. and other countries are currently working to replace LIBOR with alternative reference rates.USD-LIBOR tenors on June 30, 2023. In the U.S., the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, or ARRC, has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, as its preferred alternative rate for U.S. dollar-based LIBOR. SOFR is a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities, and is based on directly observable U.S. Treasury-backed repurchase transactions. Some market participants may continue to explore whether other U.S. dollar-based reference rates would be more appropriate for certain types of instruments. The ARRC has proposed a paced market transition plan to SOFR, and various organizations are currently working on industry wide and company-specific transition plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to LIBOR. We have material contracts that are indexed to USD-LIBOR and are monitoring this activity, evaluating the related risks and our exposure.exposure, and have already amended terms to transition to an alternative benchmark, where necessary. All of our financing arrangements and derivative instruments that incorporate LIBOR as the referenced rate either mature prior to the phase out of LIBOR or have provisions in place that provide for an alternative to LIBOR upon its phase-out. Additionally, each series of our fixed-to-floating preferred stock that becomes callable at the time the stock begins to pay a LIBOR-based rate has existing LIBOR cessation fallback language.

Summary of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
During the first quarter of 2020, we experienced unprecedented market conditions as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic, including unusually significant spread widening in both Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities. In response, we focused our efforts on raising excess liquidity and de-risking our portfolio. On March 25, 2020, we sold substantially all of our non-Agency securities in order to eliminate the risks posed by continued margin calls and ongoing funding concerns associated with the significant spread widening on these assets. We also sold approximately one-third of our Agency RMBS portfolio in order to reduce risk and raise cash to establish a strong defensive liquidity position to weather potential ongoing economic and market instability. These actions, occurring at a time of wide spreads and low prices, resulted in large realized losses in the first quarter of 2020 and a corresponding decline in book value.
Late in the first quarter of 2020, the Fed committed to unlimited purchases of Agency RMBS. The Fed’s actions were successful in helping to stabilize that market; however, the resulting historic spread tightening in the first half of 2021 made investments in Agency RMBS less attractive. As a result, and in anticipation of an accelerated tapering of Fed purchases, we reduced our aggregate Agency RMBS/TBA position during the year ended December 31, 2021. In the ordinary course of business, we make investment decisions and allocate capital in accordance with our views on the changing risk/reward dynamics in the market and in our portfolio.
34

Certain mortgage loan forbearance programs were established in connection with the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act. As the servicer of record for the MSR assets in our portfolio, we may be responsible for continuing to advance principal, interest, taxes and insurance on mortgage loans that are in forbearance, delinquency or default. At December 31, 2021, our forbearance rate had declined to less than one percent of our MSR portfolio by loan count. We are confident in our ability to meet our servicing advance obligations and have entered into a revolving credit facility to finance these advances. Further, a significant number of borrowers, who were previously eligible for forbearance plan extensions, have reached or are reaching their terminal forbearance plan expiration. This has led to improvement in actual and projected forbearance rates in our portfolio; however, over time, delinquencies and defaults in our MSR portfolio could increase if borrowers who were in forbearance are unable to resume making their monthly mortgage payments.
Our GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders was $15.0 million and GAAP net income attributable to common stockholders was $115.8$128.8 million ($(0.05) and $248.2 million ($0.41 and $0.93$0.43 per diluted weighted average share) for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, respectively, as compared to GAAP net income attributable to common stockholders of $192.2 million and GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders of $573.5 million$1.7 billion ($0.68 and $109.7 million ($(2.31) and $(0.53)$(6.24) per diluted weighted average share) for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018.2020, respectively.
With our accounting treatment for AFS securities, unrealized fluctuations in the market values of AFS securities, excluding Agencycertain interest-only securities and securities with an allowance for credit losses, do not impact our GAAP net income (loss) or taxable income but are recognized on our consolidated balance sheets as a change in stockholders’ equity under “accumulated other comprehensive income.” For the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, net unrealized losses on AFS securities recognized as other comprehensive loss, net of tax, were $59.0$113.6 million and net unrealized gains on AFS securities recognized as other comprehensive income, net of tax, were $578.6$455.3 million, respectively. This, combined with GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders of $15.0 million and GAAP net income attributable to common stockholders of $115.8 million and $248.2 million, resulted in comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders of $56.8 million and $826.7$128.8 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, respectively, resulted in comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders of $128.6 million and $326.5 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2021, respectively. For the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, net unrealized gains on AFS securities recognized as other comprehensive income, net of tax, were $265.5 million and2020, net unrealized losses on AFS securities recognized as other comprehensive loss, net of tax, were $233.9$78.7 million and $47.8 million, respectively. This, combined with GAAP net income attributable to common stockholders of $192.2 million and GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders of $573.5$1.7 billion, resulted in comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders of $113.5 million and $109.7 million, resulted in comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders of $307.9 million and $343.6 million$1.8 billion for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018,2020, respectively.
Our book value per common share for U.S. GAAP purposes was $14.54$5.87 at December 31, 2019, an increase2021, a decrease from $13.11 book value$7.63 per common share at December 31, 2018. During this twelve month period,2020. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we issued 24,439,436 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $336.3 million and recognized comprehensive incomeloss attributable to common stockholders of $826.7$326.5 million and declared common dividends of $205.6 million, which drove the overall increasedecrease in book value in excessvalue.
Although some uncertainty remains regarding the future effects of the total distributions paidCOVID-19 pandemic and the actions that may be taken by federal, state and local governmental authorities and the GSEs in response, the Agency RMBS market has stabilized and there is more clarity regarding forbearance levels and deferral programs on Agency MSR. Our liquidity position is strong, with $1.2 billion in unrestricted cash as of December 31, 2021. We continue to commonbelieve the pace of economic recovery and preferred stockholders during the year.

tapering of Agency RMBS purchases by the Fed will lead to spread normalization, at which time we expect to increase leverage and deploy excess cash into investments at more attractive levels.
51
35


The following tables present the components of our comprehensive (loss) income (loss) for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018, and the twelve months ended December 31, 2017:2020:
(in thousands, except share data)Three Months EndedYear Ended
Income Statement Data:December 31,December 31,
2021202020212020
(unaudited)(unaudited)
Interest income:
Available-for-sale securities$32,729 $72,071 $167,310 $515,685 
Other276 429 1,287 9,365 
Total interest income33,005 72,500 168,597 525,050 
Interest expense:
Repurchase agreements4,562 11,001 25,774 233,069 
Revolving credit facilities5,050 3,513 22,425 12,261 
Term notes payable3,251 3,296 12,936 14,974 
Convertible senior notes7,295 4,831 28,038 19,197 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances— — — 1,747 
Total interest expense20,158 22,641 89,173 281,248 
Net interest income12,847 49,859 79,424 243,802 
Other income (loss):
Gain (loss) on investment securities1,626 37,363 121,617 (999,859)
Servicing income125,511 100,549 468,406 443,351 
(Loss) gain on servicing asset(131,828)2,522 (114,941)(935,697)
Gain (loss) on interest rate swap and swaption agreements36,989 (14,689)42,091 (310,806)
(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments(11,565)81,289 (251,283)90,023 
Other income (loss)1,856 474 (3,845)1,422 
Total other income (loss)22,589 207,508 262,045 (1,711,566)
Expenses:
Management fees— — — 31,738 
Servicing expenses21,582 24,217 86,250 94,266 
Compensation and benefits6,396 11,220 35,041 37,723 
Other operating expenses6,648 7,237 28,759 28,626 
Restructuring charges— (294)— 5,706 
Total expenses34,626 42,380 150,050 198,059 
Income (loss) before income taxes810 214,987 191,419 (1,665,823)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes2,104 3,816 4,192 (35,688)
Net (loss) income(1,294)211,171 187,227 (1,630,135)
Dividends on preferred stock13,747 18,951 58,458 75,802 
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders$(15,041)$192,220 $128,769 $(1,705,937)
Basic (loss) earnings per weighted average common share$(0.05)$0.70 $0.43 $(6.24)
Diluted (loss) earnings per weighted average common share$(0.05)$0.68 $0.43 $(6.24)
Dividends declared per common share$0.17 $0.17 $0.68 $0.50 
Weighted average number of shares of common stock:
Basic335,100,737 273,699,079 297,772,001 273,600,947 
Diluted335,100,737 291,870,229 298,043,538 273,600,947 
36
(in thousands, except share data) Three Months Ended Year Ended
Income Statement Data: December 31, December 31,
  2019 2018 2019 2018 2017
  (unaudited) 
Interest income:          
Available-for-sale securities $230,567
 $242,535
 $962,283
 $847,325
 $631,853
Residential mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts 
 
 
 
 102,886
Other 7,871
 9,420
 32,407
 22,707
 10,350
Total interest income 238,438
 251,955
 994,690
 870,032
 745,089
Interest expense:          
Repurchase agreements 152,919
 146,702
 654,280
 469,437
 210,430
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts 
 
 
 
 82,573
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 514
 5,762
 10,920
 20,417
 36,911
Revolving credit facilities 4,038
 5,044
 19,354
 10,820
 2,341
Term notes payable 5,002
 
 10,708
 
 
Convertible senior notes 4,811
 4,793
 19,067
 18,997
 17,933
Total interest expense 167,284
 162,301
 714,329
 519,671
 350,188
Net interest income 71,154
 89,654
 280,361
 350,361
 394,901
Other-than-temporary impairment losses (3,308) (107) (14,312) (470) (789)
Other income (loss):          
Gain (loss) on investment securities 28,141
 (245,763) 280,118
 (341,312) (34,695)
Servicing income 127,690
 104,623
 501,612
 343,096
 209,065
Loss on servicing asset (21,739) (171,284) (697,659) (69,033) (91,033)
(Loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements (6,875) (239,492) (108,289) 16,043
 (9,753)
(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments (10,800) (39,122) 259,998
 (54,857) (70,159)
Other income 60
 342
 337
 3,037
 30,141
Total other income (loss) 116,477
 (590,696) 236,117
 (103,026) 33,566
Expenses:          
Management fees 17,546
 12,152
 60,102
 30,272
 40,472
Servicing expenses 20,253
 18,610
 74,607
 61,136
 35,289
Other operating expenses 14,142
 15,943
 57,055
 62,983
 54,160
Acquisition transaction costs 
 
 
 86,703
  
Restructuring charges 
 
 
 8,238
 
Total expenses 51,941
 46,705
 191,764
 249,332
 129,921
Income (loss) before income taxes 132,382
 (547,854) 310,402
 (2,467) 297,757
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes (2,372) 6,681
 (13,560) 41,823
 (10,482)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations 134,754
 (554,535) 323,962
 (44,290) 308,239
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax 
 
 
 
 44,146
Net income (loss) 134,754
 (554,535) 323,962
 (44,290) 352,385
Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 3,814
Net income (loss) attributable to Two Harbors Investment Corp. 134,754
 (554,535) 323,962
 (44,290) 348,571
Dividends on preferred stock 18,950
 18,950
 75,801
 65,395
 25,122
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $115,804
 $(573,485) $248,161
 $(109,685) $323,449

52


(in thousands)Three Months EndedYear Ended
Income Statement Data:December 31,December 31,
2021202020212020


(unaudited)(unaudited)
Comprehensive (loss) income:
Net (loss) income$(1,294)$211,171 $187,227 $(1,630,135)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities(113,553)(78,739)(455,255)(47,799)
Other comprehensive loss(113,553)(78,739)(455,255)(47,799)
Comprehensive (loss) income(114,847)132,432 (268,028)(1,677,934)
Dividends on preferred stock13,747 18,951 58,458 75,802 
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common stockholders$(128,594)$113,481 $(326,486)$(1,753,736)
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Balance Sheet Data:
(unaudited)
Available-for-sale securities$7,161,703 $14,650,922 
Mortgage servicing rights$2,191,578 $1,596,153 
Total assets$12,114,305 $19,515,921 
Repurchase agreements$7,656,445 $15,143,898 
Revolving credit facilities$420,761 $283,830 
Term notes payable$396,776 $395,609 
Convertible senior notes$424,827 $286,183 
Total stockholders’ equity$2,743,953 $3,088,926 
(in thousands) Three Months Ended Year Ended
Income Statement Data: December 31, December 31,
  2019 2018 2019 2018 2017

 (unaudited)  
Basic earnings (loss) per weighted average share:          
Continuing operations $0.42
 $(2.31) $0.93
 $(0.53) $1.62
Discontinued operations 
 
 
 
 0.23
Net income (loss) $0.42
 $(2.31) $0.93
 $(0.53) $1.85
Diluted earnings (loss) per weighted average share:          
Continuing operations $0.41
 $(2.31) $0.93
 $(0.53) $1.60
Discontinued operations 
 
 
 
 0.21
Net income (loss) $0.41
 $(2.31) $0.93
 $(0.53) $1.81
Dividends declared per common share $0.40
 $0.47
 $1.67
 $1.88
 $2.01
Weighted average number of shares of common stock:          
Basic 272,906,815
 248,081,168
 267,826,739
 206,020,502
 174,433,999
Diluted 291,070,864
 248,081,168
 267,826,739
 206,020,502
 188,133,341
Comprehensive income (loss):          
Net income (loss) $134,754
 $(554,535) $323,962
 $(44,290) $352,385
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:          
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities (58,954) 265,546
 578,583
 (233,914) 135,586
Other comprehensive (loss) income (58,954) 265,546
 578,583
 (233,914) 135,586
Comprehensive income (loss) 75,800
 (288,989) 902,545
 (278,204) $487,971
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 3,814
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Two Harbors Investment Corp. 75,800
 (288,989) 902,545
 (278,204) 484,157
Dividends on preferred stock 18,950
 18,950
 75,801
 65,395
 25,122
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $56,850
 $(307,939) $826,744
 $(343,599) $459,035

(in thousands) December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Balance Sheet Data:  
     
Available-for-sale securities $31,406,328
 $25,552,604
Mortgage servicing rights $1,909,444
 $1,993,440
Total assets $35,921,622
 $30,132,479
Repurchase agreements $29,147,463
 $23,133,476
Federal Home Loan Bank advances $210,000
 $865,024
Revolving credit facilities $300,000
 $310,000
Term notes payable $394,502
 $
Convertible senior notes $284,954
 $283,856
Total stockholders’ equity $4,970,466
 $4,254,489

Results of Operations
The following analysis focuses on financial results during the three and twelve months endedDecember 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020. The analysis of our financial results during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 is omitted from this Form 10-K and included in Part II Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

53


2020, which analysis is incorporated by reference.
Interest Income
Interest income decreased from $252.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2018 to $238.4 million for the same period in 2019 due to purchases of lower coupon Agency RMBS, sales of higher coupon Agency RMBS and higher prepayments on Agency RMBS with unamortized premium. Interest income increased from $870.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 to $994.7 million for the same period in 2019 due to the growth of our Agency RMBS portfolio.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased from $162.3$72.5 million and $519.7$525.1 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively,2020 to $167.3$33.0 million and $714.3$168.6 million for the same periods in 20192021 due to increased financingsales of both Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities that occurred during the first quarter of 2020, further sales of Agency RMBS during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and higher amortization recognized on AFSAgency RMBS due to prepayments.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased from $22.6 million and $281.2 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2020, respectively, to $20.2 million and $89.2 million for the same periods in 2021 due to lower borrowing balances related to the sale of both Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities and on MSR due to portfolio growth, and the MSR securitization completed in 2019.a lower interest rate environment.

37

Net Interest Income
The following tables present the components of interest income and average annualized net asset yield earned by asset type, the components of interest expense and average annualized cost of funds on borrowings incurred by liability and/or collateral type, and net interest income and average annualized net interest rate spread for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Three Months Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands)
Average Balance (1)
Interest Income/Expense
Net Yield/Cost of Funds (2)
Average Balance (1)
Interest Income/Expense
Net Yield/Cost of Funds (2)
Interest-earning assets:
Available-for-sale securities$6,067,568 $32,729 2.2 %$8,450,440 $167,310 2.0 %
Other— 276 — %— 1,287 — %
Total interest income/net asset yield$6,067,568 $33,005 2.2 %$8,450,440 $168,597 2.0 %
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Borrowings collateralized by:
Available-for-sale securities$6,503,608 $2,911 0.2 %$9,098,301 $20,794 0.2 %
Agency Derivatives (3)
38,045 69 0.7 %43,910 349 0.8 %
Mortgage servicing rights and advances (4)
942,357 9,883 4.2 %931,565 39,992 4.3 %
Unsecured borrowings:
Convertible senior notes424,641 7,295 6.9 %412,107 28,038 6.8 %
Total interest expense/cost of funds$7,908,651 $20,158 1.0 %$10,485,883 $89,173 0.9 %
Net interest income/spread (5)
$12,847 1.2 %$79,424 1.1 %
 Three Months Ended December 31, 2019 Year Ended December 31, 2019
(dollars in thousands)
Average Balance (1)
 Interest Income/Expense 
Net Yield/Cost of Funds (2)
 
Average Balance (1)
 Interest Income/Expense 
Net Yield/Cost of Funds (2)
Interest-earning assets           
Agency available-for-sale securities$24,694,426
 $178,621
 2.9% $23,593,771
 $763,601
 3.2%
Non-Agency available-for-sale securities3,300,836
 51,946
 6.3% 3,278,228
 198,682
 6.1%
Other9,308
 7,871
 4.2% 15,530
 32,407
 4.6%
Total interest income/net asset yield$28,004,570
 $238,438
 3.4% $26,887,529
 $994,690
 3.7%
Interest-bearing liabilities           
Repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities and term notes payable collateralized by:           
Agency available-for-sale securities$24,728,724
 $137,919
 2.2% $23,018,643
 $583,646
 2.5%
Non-Agency available-for-sale securities1,598,573
 12,179
 3.0% 1,909,564
 67,442
 3.5%
Agency derivatives (3)
50,263
 359
 2.9% 47,824
 1,556
 3.3%
Mortgage servicing rights (4)
956,985
 12,016
 5.0% 807,486
 42,618
 5.3%
Other unassignable          

Convertible senior notes284,848
 4,811
 6.8% 284,413
 19,067
 6.7%
Total interest expense/cost of funds$27,619,393
 167,284
 2.4% $26,067,930
 714,329
 2.7%
Net interest income/spread (5)
  $71,154
 1.0%   $280,361
 1.0%

54


Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 Year Ended December 31, 2018Three Months Ended December 31, 2020Year Ended December 31, 2020
(dollars in thousands)
Average Balance (1)
 Interest Income/Expense 
Net Yield/Cost of Funds (2)
 
Average Balance (1)
 Interest Income/Expense 
Net Yield/Cost of Funds (2)
(dollars in thousands)
Average Balance (1)
Interest Income/Expense
Net Yield/Cost of Funds (2)
Average Balance (1)
Interest Income/Expense
Net Yield/Cost of Funds (2)
Interest-earning assets           Interest-earning assets
Agency available-for-sale securities$21,401,757
 $176,997
 3.3% $19,782,775
 $620,581
 3.1%
Non-Agency available-for-sale securities3,405,550
 65,538
 7.7% 2,935,601
 226,743
 7.7%
Available-for-sale securitiesAvailable-for-sale securities$14,660,468 $72,071 2.0 %$19,432,462 $515,685 2.7 %
Other28,551
 9,420
 4.0% 30,148
 22,707
 4.2%Other— 429 — %2,059 9,365 3.8 %
Total interest income/net asset yield$24,835,858
 $251,955
 4.1% $22,748,524
 $870,031
 3.8%Total interest income/net asset yield$14,660,468 $72,500 2.0 %$19,434,521 $525,050 2.7 %
Interest-bearing liabilities           Interest-bearing liabilities
Repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities and term notes payable collateralized by:           
Agency available-for-sale securities$19,796,348
 $125,014
 2.5% $18,603,631
 $396,786
 2.1%
Non-Agency available-for-sale securities2,569,298
 23,802
 3.7% 2,278,651
 79,772
 3.5%
Agency derivatives (3)
48,018
 404
 3.4% 56,393
 1,650
 2.9%
Borrowings collateralized by:Borrowings collateralized by:
Available-for-sale securitiesAvailable-for-sale securities$15,415,108 $11,091 0.3 %$19,530,877 $231,491 1.2 %
Agency Derivatives (3)
Agency Derivatives (3)
52,244 123 0.9 %51,740 850 1.6 %
Mortgage servicing rights (4)
579,348
 8,288
 5.7% 407,085
 22,466
 5.5%
Mortgage servicing rights (4)
678,094 6,596 3.9 %729,172 29,710 4.1 %
Other unassignable           
Unsecured borrowings:Unsecured borrowings:
Convertible senior notes283,755
 4,793
 6.8% 283,347
 18,997
 6.7%Convertible senior notes286,070 4,831 6.8 %285,592 19,197 6.7 %
Total interest expense/cost of funds$23,276,767
 162,301
 2.8% $21,629,107
 519,671
 2.4%Total interest expense/cost of funds$16,431,516 $22,641 0.6 %$20,597,381 $281,248 1.4 %
Net interest income/spread (5)
  $89,654
 1.3%   $350,360
 1.4%
Net interest income/spread (5)
$49,859 1.4 %$243,802 1.3 %
____________________
(1)Average asset balance represents average amortized cost on AFS securities and Agency Derivatives.
(2)Cost of funds does not include the accrual and settlement of interest associated with interest rate swaps and caps. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, those costs are included in (loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). For the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019, our total average cost of funds on the assets assigned as collateral for borrowings shown in the table above, including interest spread expense associated with interest rate swaps and caps, was 2.4% and 2.5%, respectively, compared to 2.5% and 2.2% for the same periods in 2018.
(3)Yields on Agency Derivatives not shown as interest income is included in gain (loss) on other derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
(4)Yields on mortgage servicing rights not shown as these assets do not earn interest.
(5)Net interest spread does not include the accrual and settlement of interest associated with interest rate swaps and caps. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, those costs are included in gain (loss) on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). For the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019, our total average net interest rate spread on the assets and liabilities shown in the table above, including interest spread expense associated with interest rate swaps and caps, was 0.9% and 1.1%, respectively, compared to 1.4% and 1.6% for the same periods in 2018.

(1)Average asset balance represents average amortized cost on AFS securities and average unpaid principal balance on other assets.
As previously discussed, our yields and cost(2)Cost of funds does not include the accrual and settlement of interest associated with interest rate swaps. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, those costs are impacted by changesincluded in marketgain (loss) on interest ratesrate swap, cap and spreads as well as changesswaption agreements in the mixconsolidated statements of our portfolio and financing sources. Interest rates steadily increased throughout the year ended December 31, 2018 and remained generally flat throughout the first quarter of 2019. In the second quarter of 2019, interest rates began decreasing in anticipation of a rate cut by the Fed, which made its first rate cut of the year in August. The Fed subsequently made two more rate cuts in 2019 until rates stabilized toward the end of the year.
The decrease in yields on Agency AFS securities forcomprehensive (loss) income. For the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, our total average cost of funds on the assets assigned as collateral for borrowings shown in the table above, including interest spread expense associated with interest rate swaps, was 0.7% and 0.7%, respectively, compared to 0.5% and 1.2% for the same periods in 2020.
(3)Yields on Agency Derivatives not shown as interest income is included in (loss) gain on other derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.
(4)Yields on mortgage servicing rights and advances not shown as these assets do not earn interest.
(5)Net interest spread does not include the accrual and settlement of interest associated with interest rate swaps. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, those costs are included in gain (loss) on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income. For the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2021, our total average net interest rate spread on the assets and liabilities shown in the table above, including interest spread expense associated with interest rate swaps, was 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively, compared to 1.5% and 1.5% for the same periods in 2020.

38

The slight increase in yields on AFS securities for the three months ended December 31, 2021, as compared to the same periodsperiod in 2018,2020 was predominantly driven by purchases of pools with lowerhigher yields. The decrease in yields andon AFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to the same period in 2020, was predominantly driven by the sale of substantially all legacy non-Agencies during the first quarter of 2020 as well as sales of Agency pools with higher yields. The decrease in cost of funds associated with the financing of Agency AFS securities for the three months ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, was the result of a decrease in average LIBOR through the respective periods. The increase in cost of funds associated with the financing of Agency AFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, was primarily the result of the elevated repo/LIBOR spreads that persisted throughout the latter half of 2019.
The decrease in yields on non-Agency securities for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the same periods in 2018, was driven by purchases of non-Agency securities at lower yields than our existing portfolio and the sale of higher yield bonds that we believed had realized their upside potential. The decrease in cost of funds associated with the financing of non-Agency AFS securities for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, as compared to the same periods in 2018,2020, was thealso a result of lowerthe sale of non-Agencies as well as decreases in the borrowing spreads on the lower yielding securities.

55




rates offered by financing counterparties.
The decrease in cost of funds associated with the financing of Agency Derivatives for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2018,2020, was the result of a decreasedecreases in average LIBOR through the respective periods. borrowing rates offered by counterparties.
The increase in cost of funds associated with the financing of Agency Derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, was primarily the result of the elevated repo/LIBOR spreads that persisted throughout the latter half of 2019.
The decrease in cost of funds associated with the financing of MSR assets and related servicing advance obligations for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, as compared to the same periods in 2018,2020, was due to an increase in the resultuse of the issuance ofrevolving credit facility and repurchase agreement financing versus term notes payablefinancing, which carry lower rates, as well as an increase in June 2019, which incur lower amortization of deferred debt issuance costs dueon this financing. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we entered into a new revolving credit facility to their longer term to maturity and the write off of unamortized issuance costs related to the termination of a financing facility and generally better financing terms offered by counterparties.finance our servicing advance obligations, which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
Our convertible senior notes due 2022 were issued in January 2017. Our convertible senior notes due 2026 were issued in February 2021, and a portion of the proceeds from the offering were used to partially repurchase our senior notes due 2022. Both convertible senior notes due 2022 and 2026 are unsecured and pay interest semiannually at a rate of 6.25% per annum. The cost of funds associated with our convertible senior notes for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, as compared to the same periods in 2018, was consistent.2020, increased due to an increase in amortization of deferred debt issuance costs.
The following tables present the components of the yield earned by investment type on our AFS securities portfolio as a percentage of our average amortized cost of securities for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
 Three Months Ended December 31, 2019 Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
Agency (1)
 Non-Agency Total 
Agency (1)
 Non-Agency Total
Gross yield/stated coupon3.9 % 4.4% 4.0 % 4.1 % 4.7% 4.2 %
Net (premium amortization) discount accretion(1.0)% 1.9% (0.7)% (0.9)% 1.4% (0.6)%
Net yield (2)
2.9 % 6.3% 3.3 % 3.2 % 6.1% 3.6 %
Three Months EndedYear Ended
Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 Year Ended December 31, 2018December 31,December 31,
Agency (1)
 Non-Agency Total 
Agency (1)
 Non-Agency Total
(in thousands)(in thousands)2021202020212020
Gross yield/stated coupon4.1 % 4.8% 4.2 % 4.1 % 4.7% 4.1 %Gross yield/stated coupon4.9 %3.9 %4.7 %3.9 %
Net (premium amortization) discount accretion(0.8)% 2.9% (0.3)% (1.0)% 3.0% (0.4)%Net (premium amortization) discount accretion(2.7)%(1.9)%(2.7)%(1.2)%
Net yield (2)(1)
3.3 % 7.7% 3.9 % 3.1 % 7.7% 3.7 %2.2 %2.0 %2.0 %2.7 %
____________________
(1)
(1)Excludes Agency Derivatives. For the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019, the average annualized net yield on total Agency RMBS, including Agency Derivatives, was 2.9% and 3.3%, respectively, compared to 3.3% and 3.2% for the same periods in 2018.
(2)These yields have not been adjusted for cost of delay and cost to carry purchase premiums.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
We review each of our securities on a quarterly basis to determine if an OTTI charge is necessary. During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019, we recorded2021, the following other-than-temporary credit impairmentsaverage annualized net yield on non-Agency securities wheretotal RMBS, including Agency Derivatives, was 2.2% and 2.0%, respectively, compared to 2.0% and 2.7% for the future expected cash flowssame periods in 2020. Yields have not been adjusted for each security were less than its amortized cost:
 Three Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31, December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2019 2018
Other-than-temporary impairment losses$(3,308) $(107) $(14,312) $(470)
Number of non-Agency securities6
 1
 18
 3

cost of delay and cost to carry purchase premiums.
For further information about evaluating AFS securities for OTTI, refer to Note 4 -
Available-for-Sale Securities, at Fair Value of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

56




Gain (Loss) On Investment Securities
The following tables present the components of gain (loss) on investment securities for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Three Months Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2021
(in thousands)Available-For-Sale SecuritiesTrading SecuritiesTotalAvailable-For-Sale SecuritiesTrading SecuritiesTotal
Proceeds from sales$1,171,299 $— $1,171,299 $6,274,193 $— $6,274,193 
Amortized cost sold(1,139,241)— (1,139,241)(6,137,824)— (6,137,824)
Total realized gains on sales32,058 — 32,058 136,369 — 136,369 
Provision for credit losses(3,347)— (3,347)(9,763)— (9,763)
Other(27,085)— (27,085)(4,989)— (4,989)
Gain on investment securities$1,626 $— $1,626 $121,617 $— $121,617 
39

 Three Months Ended December 31, 2019 Year Ended December 31, 2019
(in thousands)Available-For-Sale Securities Equity Securities Total Available-For-Sale Securities Equity Securities Total
Proceeds from sales$1,814,250
 $
 $1,814,250
 $15,879,823
 $
 $15,879,823
Amortized cost of securities sold(1,786,635) 
 (1,786,635) (15,595,809) 
 (15,595,809)
Total realized gains27,615
 
 27,615
 284,014
 
 284,014
Change in unrealized gains (losses) (1)
526
 
 526
 (3,896) 
 (3,896)
Dividend income
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on investment securities$28,141
 $
 $28,141
 $280,118
 $
 $280,118
Three Months Ended December 31, 2020Year Ended December 31, 2020
(in thousands)Available-For-Sale SecuritiesTrading SecuritiesTotalAvailable-For-Sale SecuritiesTrading SecuritiesTotal
Proceeds from sales$1,379,468 $— $1,379,468 18,349,338 $1,053,477 $19,402,815 
Amortized cost sold(1,325,981)— (1,325,981)(19,273,667)(1,052,500)(20,326,167)
Total realized gains (losses) on sales53,487 — 53,487 (924,329)977 (923,352)
Provision for credit losses(4,509)— (4,509)(58,440)— (58,440)
Other(11,615)— (11,615)(18,067)— (18,067)
Gain (loss) on investment securities$37,363 $— $37,363 $(1,000,836)$977 $(999,859)

 Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 Year Ended December 31, 2018
(in thousands)Available-For-Sale Securities Equity Securities Total Available-For-Sale Securities Equity Securities Total
Proceeds from sales$6,045,720
 $
 $6,045,720
 $15,202,406
 $31,276
 $15,233,682
Amortized cost of securities sold(6,294,564) 
 (6,294,564) (15,551,968) (30,054) (15,582,022)
Total realized (losses) gains(248,844) 
 (248,844) (349,562) 1,222
 (348,340)
Change in unrealized gains(1)
3,081
 
 3,081
 5,094
 641
 5,735
Dividend income
 
 
 
 1,293
 1,293
(Loss) gain on investment securities$(245,763) $
 $(245,763) $(344,468) $3,156
 $(341,312)
____________________
(1)On July 1, 2015, we elected the fair value option for Agency interest-only mortgage-backed securities acquired on or after such date. All Agency interest-only mortgage-backed securities acquired on or after July 1, 2015 are carried at estimated fair value with changes in fair value recorded as a component of gain (loss) on investment securities in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Due to the unprecedented market conditions experienced as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic, we sold substantially all of our portfolio of non-Agency securities and approximately one-third of our Agency RMBS during the first quarter of 2020. Late in the first quarter of 2020, the Fed committed to unlimited purchases of Agency RMBS. The Fed’s actions were successful in helping to stabilize that market; however, the resulting historic spread tightening in the first half of 2021 made investments in Agency RMBS less attractive. As a result, and in anticipation of an accelerated tapering of Fed purchases, we reduced our aggregate Agency RMBS/TBA position during the year ended December 31, 2021. In the ordinary course of business, we make investment decisions and allocate capital in accordance with our views on the changing risk/reward dynamics in the market and in our portfolio. We do not expect to sell assets on a frequent basis, but may sell assets to reallocate capital into new assets that we believe have higher risk-adjusted returns.
Subsequent to the adoption of Topic 326 on January 1, 2020, the Company uses a discounted cash flow method to estimate and recognize an allowance for credit losses on AFS securities, as detailed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, included under Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Subsequent adverse or favorable changes in expected cash flows are recognized immediately in earnings as a provision for or reversal of provision for credit losses (within gain (loss) on investment securities).
The decrease in changemajority of the “other” component of gain (loss) on investment securities is related to changes in unrealized gains (losses) on Agencycertain interest-only mortgage-backed securities forsecurities. For the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019, as compared to2021, the same period in 2018, wasunrealized losses recognized were primarily due to lowerfaster prepayment expectations relative to prepayment expectations in the previous quarter. The increase in change in unrealized losses (decrease in gains) on Agency interest-only mortgage-backed securities for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, was due to interest rates generally falling throughout the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to interest rates generally rising throughout the year ended December 31, 2018, resulting in slower prepayment expectations.assumptions.
Servicing Income
The following table presents the components of servicing income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Three Months EndedYear Ended
December 31,December 31,
(in thousands)2021202020212020
Servicing fee income$123,912 $98,250 $461,381 $416,936 
Ancillary and other fee income548 557 2,436 1,945 
Float income1,051 1,742 4,589 24,470 
Total$125,511 $100,549 $468,406 $443,351 
 Three Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31, December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2019 2018
Servicing fee income$109,403
 $94,078
 $436,587
 $312,100
Ancillary and other fee income499
 276
 1,801
 1,280
Float income17,788
 10,269
 63,224
 29,716
Total$127,690
 $104,623
 $501,612
 $343,096

57




The increase in servicing income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, as compared to the same periods in 2018,2020, was the resultdue to a higher portfolio balance and lower compensating interest, offset by lower float income.
40

Loss on(Loss) Gain On Servicing Asset
The following table presents the components of loss on servicing asset for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Three Months EndedYear Ended
December 31,December 31,
(in thousands)2021202020212020
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions used in the valuation model$21,189 $173,447 $562,843 $(396,900)
Changes in fair value due to realization of cash flows (runoff)(152,450)(170,897)(666,160)(538,761)
Losses on sales(567)(28)(11,624)(36)
(Loss) gain on servicing asset$(131,828)$2,522 $(114,941)$(935,697)
 Three Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31, December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2019 2018
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions used in the valuation model$87,561
 $(129,401) $(390,149) $80,209
Changes in fair value due to realization of cash flows (runoff)(109,333) (42,125) (307,918) (149,879)
Gains on sales33
 242
 408
 637
Loss on servicing asset$(21,739) $(171,284) $(697,659) $(69,033)

The decreaseincrease in loss (decrease in gain) on servicing asset for the three months ended December 31, 2019,2021, as compared to the same period in 2018,2020, was driven by a decrease in expected prepayment speed assumptions used in the fair valuation of MSR decreasing at a lower rate and realized losses on sales of MSR, offset by highera decrease in portfolio runoff on a larger MSR portfolio during the three months ended December 31, 2019.runoff. The increasedecrease in loss on servicing asset for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, as compared to the same period in 2018,2020, was driven by decreasesfavorable change in interest rates, an increase in prepayment speedvaluation assumptions used in the fair market valuation of MSR, and higherincluding the impact of acquiring MSR at a cost below fair value, offset by increased portfolio runoff and realized losses on a largersales of MSR portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.
Gain (Loss) Gain onOn Interest Rate Swap Cap andAnd Swaption Agreements
The following table summarizes the net interest spread and gains and losses associated with our interest rate swap cap and swaption positions recognized during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Three Months EndedYear Ended
December 31,December 31,
(in thousands)2021202020212020
Net interest spread$5,772 $1,953 $14,262 $(66,175)
Early termination, agreement maturation and option expiration (losses) gains(5,143)(2,546)2,369 (387,748)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap and swaption agreements, at fair value36,360 (14,096)25,460 143,117 
Gain (loss) on interest rate swap and swaption agreements$36,989 $(14,689)$42,091 $(310,806)
 Three Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31, December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2019 2018
Net interest spread$4,768
 $15,331
 $70,514
 $49,217
Early termination, agreement maturation and option expiration (losses) gains(1,495) (35,757) 94,929
 (3,593)
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements, at fair value(10,148) (219,066) (273,732) (29,581)
(Loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements$(6,875) $(239,492) $(108,289) $16,043

Net interest spread recognized for the accrual and/or settlement of the net interest expense associated with our interest rate swaps and caps results from receiving either LIBORa floating interest rate (LIBOR, OIS or SOFR) or a fixed interest rate and paying either a fixed interest rate or LIBORa floating interest rate (LIBOR, OIS or SOFR) on positions held to economically hedge/mitigate portfolio interest rate exposure (or duration) risk. We may elect to terminate certain swaps caps and swaptions to align with our investment portfolio, agreements may mature or options may expire resulting in full settlement of our net interest spread asset/liability and the recognition of realized gains and losses, including early termination penalties. During the second quarter of 2020, we elected to terminate certain swaps and swaptions in order to adjust the total notional and fixed interest rates on these instruments, as a result of adjustments made to our investment portfolio and changes in interest rates. The change in fair value of interest rate swaps caps and swaptions during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 was a result of changes to LIBOR,floating interest rates (LIBOR, OIS or SOFR), the swap curve and corresponding counterparty borrowing rates. Since swaps caps and swaptions are used for purposes of hedging our interest rate exposure, their unrealized valuation gains and losses (excluding the reversal of unrealized gains and losses to realized gains and losses upon termination, maturation or option expiration) are generally offset by unrealized losses and gains in our Agency RMBS AFS portfolio, which are recorded either directly to stockholders’ equity through other comprehensive (loss) income, (loss), net of tax, or to gain (loss) on investment securities, in the case of Agencycertain interest-only mortgage-backed securities.

5841


(Loss) Gain onOn Other Derivative Instruments
The following table provides a summary of the total (loss) gainnet gains (losses) recognized on other derivative instruments we hold for purposes of both hedging and non-hedging activities, principally TBAs, put and call options for TBAs, Markit IOS total return swaps, short U.S. treasuries, U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures and inverse interest-only securities during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Three Months Ended Year EndedThree Months EndedYear Ended
December 31, December 31,December 31,December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2019 2018(in thousands)2021202020212020
Interest income, net of accretion, on inverse interest-only securities$1,702
 $1,437
 $5,586
 $6,463
Interest income, net of accretion, on inverse interest-only securities$1,058 $2,232 $5,418 $9,479 
Interest expense on short U.S. treasuries
 (5,592) (1,315) (9,302)
Realized and unrealized net gains (losses) on other derivative instruments (1)
(12,502) (34,967) 255,727
 (52,018)
Realized and unrealized net gains (losses) on other derivative instruments (1)
(12,623)79,057 (256,701)80,544 
(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments$(10,800) $(39,122) $259,998
 $(54,857)(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments$(11,565)$81,289 $(251,283)$90,023 
____________________
(1)As these derivative instruments are considered trading instruments, our financial results include both realized and unrealized gains (losses) associated with these instruments.
(1)As these derivative instruments are considered trading instruments, our financial results include both realized and unrealized gains (losses) associated with these instruments.

For further details regarding our use of derivative instruments and related activity, refer to Note 7 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities to the consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Income
We recorded
Expenses
The following table presents the components of expenses, other income of $0.1 million and $0.3 millionthan restructuring charges, for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 20192021 and $0.3 million and $3.0 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively. The decrease in other income for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019, as compared2020:
Three Months EndedYear Ended
December 31,December 31,
(in thousands, except share data)2021202020212020
Management fees$— $— $— $31,738 
Servicing expenses$21,582 $24,217 $86,250 $94,266 
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits:
Non-cash equity compensation expenses$2,525 $2,243 $11,485 $9,730 
All other compensation and benefits3,871 8,977 23,556 27,993 
Total compensation and benefits$6,396 $11,220 $35,041 $37,723 
Other operating expenses:
Nonrecurring expenses$665 $1,541 $5,220 $5,205 
All other operating expenses5,983 5,696 23,539 23,421 
Total other operating expenses$6,648 $7,237 $28,759 $28,626 
Annualized operating expense ratio1.9 %2.4 %2.3 %2.0 %
Annualized operating expense ratio, excluding non-cash equity compensation and other nonrecurring expenses1.4 %1.9 %1.7 %1.5 %

Prior to the same periods in 2018,termination of the Management Agreement on August 14, 2020, a management fee was driven by losses on extinguishment of debt and lower dividend income on our FHLB stock due to a decrease in the average balance held.

59




Expenses
The following table presents the components of expenses, excluding nonrecurring transaction expenses, for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 Three Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31, December 31,
(in thousands, except share data)2019 2018 2019 2018
Management fees$17,546
 $12,152
 $60,102
 $30,272
Servicing expenses$20,253
 $18,610
 $74,607
 $61,136
Other operating expenses:       
Officers’ compensation incurred by PRCM Advisers on our behalf and reimbursed by us (1)
$141
 $242
 $3,054
 $1,785
Other direct and allocated costs incurred by PRCM Advisers on our behalf and reimbursed by us4,423
 5,263
 24,548
 24,512
Non-cash equity compensation expenses       
Amortization of executive officers’ restricted stock (2)
1,221
 1,791
 3,395
 6,791
Amortization of other restricted stock1,202
 1,420
 5,265
 5,501
Total non-cash equity compensation expenses2,423
 3,211
 8,660
 12,292
All other operating expenses7,155
 7,227
 20,793
 24,394
Total other operating expenses$14,142
 $15,943
 $57,055
 $62,983
Annualized other operating expense ratio1.1% 1.4% 1.2% 1.6%
Annualized other operating expense ratio, excluding non-cash equity compensation expenses0.9% 1.1% 1.0% 1.3%
____________________
(1)Officers include our principal financial officer and general counsel. We do not reimburse PRCM Advisers for any expenses related to the compensation of our chief executive officer or chief investment officer.
(2)Equity based compensation expense related to the amortization of restricted stock awarded to our executive officers, including our chief executive officer, chief investment officer, principal financial officer and general counsel.

Management fees are payable to PRCM Advisers our external manager, under our managementthe agreement. The management fee iswas calculated based on our stockholders’ equity with certain adjustments outlined in the management agreement. In connection with the acquisition of CYS effective July 31, 2018, the management agreement was amended to (i) reduce PRCM Advisers’ base management fee with respect to the additional equity under management resulting from the merger to 0.75% from the effective time through the first anniversary of the effective time and (ii) for the fiscal quarter in which closing of the merger occurred, to make a one-time downward adjustment of Pine River’s management fees payable by Two Harbors for such quarter by $15.0 million to offset the cash consideration payable to stockholders of CYS, plus an additional downward adjustment of up to $3.3 million for certain transaction-related expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the total one-time downward adjustment to management fees was $17.5 million. Effective July 31, 2019, the management fee reduction on the equity acquired in the CYS transaction expired. We do not anticipate any further downward adjustments to management fees for transaction-related expenses.
We also incur servicing expenses generally related to the subservicing of MSR and other operating expenses.MSR. The increasedecrease in servicing expenses during the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, as compared to the same periods in 2018,2020, was largely thea result of an increasea decrease in loan forbearance and adjustments for preliquidation claims.
42

Table of Contents
Prior to the sizetermination of our MSR portfolio. Includedthe Management Agreement, included in compensation and benefits and other operating expenses arewere direct and allocated costs incurred by PRCM Advisers on our behalf and reimbursed by us, includingus. For the year ended December 31, 2020 these direct and allocated costs totaled approximately $19.3 million. Included in these reimbursed costs was compensation paid to employees of Pine River serving as our principal financial officer and general counsel. The allocationan affiliate of compensation paid to employees of Pine RiverPRCM Advisers serving as our principal financial officer and general counsel isof $1.4 million respectively for the year ended December 31, 2020. We did not reimburse PRCM Advisers for compensation paid to our principal financial officer and general counsel for the three months ended December 31, 2020. Prior to termination of the Management Agreement, the allocation of compensation paid to employees of an affiliate of PRCM Advisers serving as our principal financial officer and general counsel was based on time spent overseeing our activities in accordance with the management agreement;Management Agreement; we dodid not reimburse PRCM Advisers for any expenses related to the compensation of our chief executive officer or chief investment officer. Additionally, included in compensation and benefits is non-cash equity compensation expense, which represents amortization of the restricted stock awarded to our independent directors, executive officers and other eligible individuals. Included in non-cash equity compensation expense for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2020 was amortization of restricted stock awarded to our executive officers, including our chief executive officer, chief investment officer, principal financial officer and general counsel of $0.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively.
Following the termination of the Management Agreement, we no longer pay a management fee to, or reimburse the expenses of, PRCM Advisers. Expenses for which we previously reimbursed PRCM Advisers are now paid directly by us. We have direct relationships withare also now responsible for the majoritycash compensation and employee benefits of our third-party vendors. We will continuechief executive officer, chief investment officer and investment professionals, which were previously the responsibility of PRCM Advisers. Prior to the termination of the Management Agreement, we were only responsible for the equity compensation paid to such individuals.
Restructuring Charges
On April 13, 2020, we announced that we had elected to not renew the Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers on the basis of unfair compensation payable to the manager pursuant to Section 13(a)(ii) of the Management Agreement. As a result, we had expected the Management Agreement to terminate on September 19, 2020, at which time we would have certain costs allocatedbeen required to uspay a termination fee equal to three times the sum of the average annual base management fee earned by PRCM Advisers during the 24-month period immediately preceding the date of termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination, pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement. The termination fee was calculated to be $139.8 million based on results as of June 30, 2020 and recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2020.
On July 15, 2020, we provided PRCM Advisers with a notice of termination of the Management Agreement for compensation, data services, technology“cause” on the basis of certain material breaches of the Management Agreement by PRCM Advisers, its agents and/or its assignees that are incapable of being cured within the time period set forth therein and certain office lease payments, but mostevents of our expenses with third-party vendors are paid directly by us.

60




Acquisition Transaction Costs
The acquisition of CYS was treated as an asset purchase under U.S. GAAP. Given there were no meaningful nonfinancial assets and non-current assets acquiredPRCM Advisers in the mergerperformance of its duties under the Management Agreement. The Management Agreement subsequently terminated on August 14, 2020. No termination fee was payable to PRCM Advisers in connection with CYS and no identified intangible assetssuch termination, pursuant to assign value,Section 15(a) of the excess consideration and costs associatedManagement Agreement.
In connection with the transaction were recognized intermination of the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) as acquisition transaction costs.Management Agreement, we reversed the $139.8 million accrued termination fee during the three months ended September 30, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2018, these acquisition transaction costs totaled approximately $86.7 million.
Restructuring Charges
In connection with the acquisition of CYS,2020, we incurred a total of $5.7 million in contract termination costs, which includes all estimated costs incurred for legal and advisory services provided to facilitate the termination of the Management Agreement. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, all contract termination costs are included within restructuring charges including termination benefits, contract terminationson our consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.
Income Taxes
During the three and other associated costs,twelve months ended December 31, 2021, our TRSs recognized a provision for income taxes of $8.2$2.1 million and $4.2 million, respectively, which was primarily due to income from MSR servicing activity and gains recognized on MSR, offset by net losses recognized on derivative instruments and operating expenses. During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2020, our TRSs recognized a provision for income taxes of $3.8 million and a benefit from income taxes of $35.7 million, respectively. The provision recognized for the three months ended December 31, 2020 was primarily due to gains recognized on MSR, offset by net losses recognized on derivative instruments held in our TRSs. The benefit recognized for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Income Taxes
During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019, our TRSs recognized a benefit from income taxes of $2.4 million and $13.6 million, respectively, which2020 was primarily due to losses recognized on MSR, offset by net gains recognized on derivative instruments held in the Company’sour TRSs. During the
three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, our TRSs recognized a provision for income taxes of $6.7 million and $41.8 million, which was primarily due to realized gains on sales of AFS securities and gains recognized on MSR held in the TRSs as well as the write-down of net deferred tax assets resulting from the deemed liquidation of one of our TRSs due to its TRS election revocation, offset by net losses incurred on derivative instruments held in the TRSs. We currently intend to distribute 100% of our REIT taxable income and comply with all requirements to continue to qualify as a REIT.

43

Table of Contents
Financial Condition
Available-for-Sale Securities, at Fair Value
Agency RMBS
Our Agency RMBSThe majority of our AFS investment securities portfolio is comprised of adjustablefixed rate and fixed rateAgency mortgage-backed securities backed by single-family and multi-family mortgage loans. We also hold $12.3 million in tranches of mortgage-backed and asset-backed P&I and interest-only non-Agency securities. All of our principal and interestP&I Agency RMBS AFS wereare Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac mortgage pass-through certificates or collateralized mortgage obligations that carry an implied rating of “AAA,” or Ginnie Mae mortgage pass-through certificates, which are backed by the guarantee of the U.S. government. The majority of these securities consist of whole pools in which we own all of the investment interests in the securities.
The tables below summarizesummarizes certain characteristics of our Agency RMBS AFS at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands, except purchase price)Principal/ Current FaceNet (Discount) PremiumAmortized CostAllowance for Credit LossesUnrealized GainUnrealized LossCarrying ValueWeighted Average Coupon RateWeighted Average Purchase Price
P&I securities$6,411,363 $270,687 $6,682,050 $— $171,308 $(4,855)$6,848,503 3.65 %$104.66 
Interest-only securities3,198,447 305,577 305,577 (12,851)20,699 (12,529)300,896 2.93 %$14.09 
Total$9,609,810 $576,264 $6,987,627 $(12,851)$192,007 $(17,384)$7,149,399 
 December 31, 2019
(dollars in thousands, except purchase price)Principal/ Current Face Net (Discount) Premium Amortized Cost Unrealized Gain Unrealized Loss Carrying Value Weighted Average Coupon Rate Weighted Average Purchase Price
P&I securities               
Fixed$26,225,918
 $985,699
 $27,211,617
 $424,428
 $(8,758) $27,627,287
 3.80% $103.96
Hybrid ARM13,626
 625
 14,251
 390
 (57) 14,584
 5.81% $107.58
Total P&I securities26,239,544
 986,324
 27,225,868
 424,818
 (8,815) 27,641,871
 3.80% $103.96
Interest-only securities               
Fixed609,012
 44,970
 44,970
 3,482
 (676) 47,776
 3.13% $34.16
Fixed Other (1)
1,992,681
 124,841
 124,841
 10,242
 (46,675) 88,408
 1.68% $8.72
Total$28,841,237
 $1,156,135
 $27,395,679
 $438,542
 $(56,166) $27,778,055
    

61




 December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands, except purchase price)Principal/ Current Face Net (Discount) Premium Amortized Cost Unrealized Gain Unrealized Loss Carrying Value Weighted Average Coupon Rate Weighted Average Purchase Price
Principal and interest securities:               
Fixed$20,757,850
 $1,011,781
 $21,769,631
 $60,819
 $(339,906) $21,490,544
 4.33% $105.19
Hybrid ARM17,940
 915
 18,855
 309
 (91) 19,073
 5.12% $107.63
Total P&I Securities20,775,790
 1,012,696
 21,788,486
 61,128
 (339,997) 21,509,617
 4.33% $105.20
Interest-only securities               
Fixed794,144
 58,886
 58,886
 4,880
 (403) 63,363
 2.84% $33.15
Fixed Other (1)
2,321,823
 151,015
 151,015
 9,290
 (48,252) 112,053
 1.55% $8.82
Total$23,891,757
 $1,222,597
 $21,998,387
 $75,298
 $(388,652) $21,685,033
    
____________________
(1)Fixed Other represents weighted-average coupon interest-only securities that are not generally used for our interest-rate risk management purposes. These securities pay variable coupon interest based on the weighted average of the fixed rates of the underlying loans of the security, less the weighted average rates of the applicable issued P&I securities.

Our three-month average constant prepayment rate, or CPR, experienced by Agency RMBS AFS owned by us as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, on an annualized basis, was 14.3% and 6.8%, respectively.

Non-Agency Securities
Our non-Agency securities portfolio is comprised of senior and mezzanine tranches of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. The following tables provide investment information on our non-Agency securities as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
 December 31, 2019
(in thousands)Principal/Current Face Un-amortized Premium Accretable Purchase Discount Credit Reserve Purchase Discount Amortized Cost Unrealized Gain Unrealized Loss Carrying Value
P&I securities               
Senior$4,861,854
 $8,966
 $(445,566) $(1,594,480) $2,830,774
 $262,527
 $(20,203) $3,073,098
Mezzanine636,800
 14
 (114,574) (117,471) 404,769
 79,056
 (3,060) 480,765
Total P&I5,498,654
 8,980
 (560,140) (1,711,951) 3,235,543
 341,583
 (23,263) 3,553,863
Interest-only securities4,356,603
 79,935
 
 
 79,935
 3,039
 (8,564) 74,410
Total$9,855,257
 $88,915
 $(560,140) $(1,711,951) $3,315,478
 $344,622
 $(31,827) $3,628,273
 December 31, 2018
(in thousands)Principal/Current Face Un-amortized Premium Accretable Purchase Discount Credit Reserve Purchase Discount Amortized Cost Unrealized Gain Unrealized Loss Carrying Value
P&I securities               
Senior$4,227,631
 $5,381
 $(477,682) $(1,204,325) $2,551,005
 $343,358
 $(39,632) $2,854,731
Mezzanine1,132,493
 1,301
 (216,437) (118,437) 798,920
 134,737
 (5,025) 928,632
Total P&I5,360,124
 6,682
 (694,119) (1,322,762) 3,349,925
 478,095
 (44,657) 3,783,363
Interest-only securities5,137,169
 83,846
 
 
 83,846
 3,655
 (3,293) 84,208
Total$10,497,293
 $90,528
 $(694,119) $(1,322,762) $3,433,771
 $481,750
 $(47,950) $3,867,571


62




December 31, 2020
(dollars in thousands, except purchase price)Principal/ Current FaceNet (Discount) PremiumAmortized CostAllowance for Credit LossesUnrealized GainUnrealized LossCarrying ValueWeighted Average Coupon RateWeighted Average Purchase Price
P&I securities$13,103,355 $605,239 $13,708,594 $— $629,079 $(420)$14,337,253 3.64 %$104.95 
Interest-only securities3,649,556 315,876 315,876 (17,889)15,680 (13,029)300,638 2.72 %$14.42 
Total$16,752,911 $921,115 $14,024,470 $(17,889)$644,759 $(13,449)$14,637,891 
The majority of our non-Agency securities were rated at
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. These credit ratings are based on the par value of the non-Agency securities, whereas the distressed non-Agency securities in our portfolio were acquired at heavily discounted prices. The following table summarizes the credit ratings of our non-Agency securities portfolio, based on the Bloomberg Index Rating, a composite of each of the four major credit rating agencies (i.e., DBRS Ltd., Moody’s Investors Services, Inc., Standard & Poor’s Corporation and Fitch, Inc.), as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
 December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
AAA0.4% 0.5%
AA% %
A% 0.1%
BBB% 2.1%
BB% 0.6%
B1.3% 5.3%
Below B78.5% 73.3%
Not rated19.8% 18.1%
Total100.0% 100.0%

Within our non-Agency securities portfolio, we have a substantial emphasis on “legacy” securities, which include securities issued up to and including 2009, many of which are subprime. We believe these deeply discounted securities can add relative value as the economy and housing markets continue to improve, as there remains upside optionality to lower delinquencies, higher recoveries and faster prepays.
Due to acquisitions of “legacy” non-Agency securities, our designated credit reserve as a percentage of total discount increased from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019 (as disclosed in Note 4 - Available-for-Sale Securities, at Fair Value of the notes to the consolidated financial statements). From December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019, our designated credit reserve as a percentage of total discount increased from 65.6% to 75.3%.
A subprime bond may generally be considered higher risk; however, if purchased at a discount that reflects a high expectation of credit losses, it could be viewed as less risky than a prime bond, which is subject to unanticipated credit loss performance. Accordingly, we believe our risk profile in owning a heavily discounted subprime bond with known delinquencies affords us the ability to assume a higher percentage of expected credit loss with comparable risk-adjusted returns to a less discounted prime bond with a lower percentage of expected credit loss.

63




The following tables present certain information by investment type and, if applicable, their respective underlying loan characteristics for our senior and mezzanine non-Agency securities, excluding our non-Agency interest-only portfolio, at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
  December 31, 2019
Non-Agency P&I Securities Senior Mezzanine Total
Carrying value (in thousands) $3,073,098
 $480,765
 $3,553,863
% of total 86.5% 13.5% 100.0%
Weighted average purchase price (1)
 $63.63
 $65.36
 $63.86
Weighted average coupon 2.9% 2.5% 2.8%
Weighted average fixed coupon 5.8% 5.5% 5.8%
Weighted average floating coupon 2.5% 2.3% 2.5%
Weighted average hybrid coupon 4.6% 5.4% 4.6%
Collateral attributes      
Weighted average loan age (months) 160
 167
 161
Weighted average current loan size (in thousands) $207
 $255
 $214
Weighted average current loan-to-value 60.5% 58.3% 60.2%
Current performance      
60+ day delinquencies 18.1% 16.5% 17.9%
Average credit enhancement (2)
 1.9% 8.1% 2.8%
3-month CPR (3)
 6.1% 8.5% 6.4%
CDR (4)
 5.0% 4.5% 4.9%
Severity (5)
 48.6% 33.2% 46.6%
Cumulative loss (6)
 36.3% 21.9% 34.3%

64




  December 31, 2018
Non-Agency P&I Securities Senior Mezzanine Total P&I
Carrying value (in thousands) $2,854,731
 $928,632
 $3,783,363
% of total 75.5% 24.5% 100.0%
Weighted average purchase price (1)
 $60.79
 $67.51
 $62.44
Weighted average coupon 3.4% 3.2% 3.3%
Weighted average fixed coupon 5.7% 4.0% 5.0%
Weighted average floating coupon 3.1% 3.1% 3.1%
Weighted average hybrid coupon 4.6% % 4.6%
Collateral Attributes      
Weighted average loan age (months) 147
 144
 147
Weighted average current loan size (in thousands) $215
 $180
 $206
Weighted average current loan-to-value 64.4% 55.0% 62.2%
Current Performance      
60+ day delinquencies 19.5% 15.9% 18.6%
Average credit enhancement (2)
 5.1% 15.0% 7.5%
3-month CPR (3)
 5.0% 5.7% 5.1%
CDR (4)
 4.8% 4.2% 4.7%
Severity (5)
 48.5% 39.7% 46.4%
Cumulative loss (6)
 34.9% 17.4% 30.8%
____________________
(1)Average purchase price utilized carrying value for weighting purposes. If current face were utilized for weighting purposes, the average purchase price for senior, mezzanine, and total non-Agency securities, excluding our non-Agency interest-only portfolio, would be $59.53, $60.13 and $59.60, respectively, at December 31, 2019 and $58.17, $64.90 and $59.59, respectively at December 31, 2018.
(2)Average credit enhancement remaining on our non-Agency P&I securities portfolio, which is the average amount of protection available to absorb future credit losses due to defaults on the underlying collateral.
(3)Three-month CPR is reflective of the prepayment speed on the underlying securitization; however, it does not necessarily indicate the proceeds received on our investment tranche. Proceeds received for each security are dependent on the position of the individual security within the structure of each deal.
(4)Constant default rate, or CDR, represents the percentage of outstanding principal balances in the pool that are in default.
(5)Severity rates reflect the amount of loss expected from a foreclosure and liquidation of the underlying collateral in the mortgage loan pool.
(6)Represents the percentage of cumulative losses to date on the underlying loans.

  December 31, 2019
  Non-Agency P&I Securities
(dollars in thousands) Senior Mezzanine Total
Collateral Type Carrying Value % of Senior Carrying Value % of Mezzanine Carrying Value % of Total
Prime $26,840
 0.9% $3,482
 0.7% $30,322
 0.9%
Alt-A 385,414
 12.5% 72,434
 15.1% 457,848
 12.9%
Pay-option ARM 234,603
 7.6% 166,777
 34.7% 401,380
 11.3%
Subprime 2,421,860
 78.9% 238,072
 49.5% 2,659,932
 74.8%
Other 4,381
 0.1% 
 % 4,381
 0.1%
Total $3,073,098
 100.0% $480,765
 100.0% $3,553,863
 100.0%

65




  December 31, 2018
  Non-Agency P&I Securities
(dollars in thousands) Senior Mezzanine Total
Collateral Type Carrying Value % of Senior Carrying Value % of Mezzanine Carrying Value % of Total
Prime $35,519
 1.2% $13,797
 1.5% $49,316
 1.3%
Alt-A 367,985
 12.9% 89,785
 9.7% 457,770
 12.1%
Pay-option ARM 214,683
 7.5% 171,348
 18.4% 386,031
 10.2%
Subprime 2,232,166
 78.2% 525,009
 56.5% 2,757,175
 72.9%
Other 4,378
 0.2% 128,693
 13.9% 133,071
 3.5%
Total $2,854,731
 100.0% $928,632
 100.0% $3,783,363
 100.0%
  December 31, 2019
  Non-Agency P&I Securities
(dollars in thousands) Senior Mezzanine Total
Coupon Type Carrying Value % of Senior Carrying Value % of Mezzanine Carrying Value % of Total
Fixed rate $250,189
 8.1% $27,387
 5.7% $277,576
 7.8%
Hybrid or floating 2,822,909
 91.9% 453,378
 94.3% 3,276,287
 92.2%
Total $3,073,098
 100.0% $480,765
 100.0% $3,553,863
 100.0%
  December 31, 2018
  Non-Agency P&I Securities
(dollars in thousands) Senior Mezzanine Total
Coupon Type Carrying Value % of Senior Carrying Value % of Mezzanine Carrying Value % of Total
Fixed rate $228,939
 8.0% $149,089
 16.1% $378,028
 10.0%
Hybrid or floating 2,625,792
 92.0% 779,543
 83.9% 3,405,335
 90.0%
Total $2,854,731
 100.0% $928,632
 100.0% $3,783,363
 100.0%
  December 31, 2019
  Non-Agency P&I Securities
(dollars in thousands) Senior Mezzanine Total
Origination Year Carrying Value % of Senior Carrying Value % of Mezzanine Carrying Value % of Total
2006 and thereafter $2,848,895
 92.7% $260,819
 54.3% $3,109,714
 87.5%
2002-2005 223,597
 7.3% 219,848
 45.7% 443,445
 12.5%
Pre-2002 606
 % 98
 % 704
 %
Total $3,073,098
 100.0% $480,765
 100.0% $3,553,863
 100.0%
  December 31, 2018
  Non-Agency P&I Securities
(dollars in thousands) Senior Mezzanine Total
Origination Year Carrying Value % of Senior Carrying Value % of Mezzanine Carrying Value % of Total
2006 and thereafter $2,630,095
 92.1% $444,007
 47.8% $3,074,102
 81.2%
2002-2005 219,183
 7.7% 483,061
 52.0% 702,244
 18.6%
Pre-2002 5,453
 0.2% 1,564
 0.2% 7,017
 0.2%
Total $2,854,731
 100.0% $928,632
 100.0% $3,783,363
 100.0%


66




The underlying mortgage loans collateralizing our non-Agency securities are located across the U.S. The following table presents the five largest geographic concentrations of the mortgages and assets collateralizing these securities at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)Carrying Value % of Total Non-Agency Securities Carrying Value % of Total Non-Agency Securities
California$1,051,536
 29.0% $1,041,464
 26.9%
New York545,407
 15.0% 393,936
 10.2%
Florida360,696
 9.9% 529,738
 13.7%
New Jersey165,501
 4.6% 153,687
 4.0%
Texas157,307
 4.3% 176,265
 4.6%
Total$2,280,447
 62.8% $2,295,090
 59.4%

Mortgage Servicing Rights, at Fair Value
One of our wholly owned subsidiaries has approvals from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to own and manage MSR, which represent the right to control the servicing of mortgage loans. We do not directly service mortgage loans, and instead contract with appropriately licensed subservicers to handle substantially all servicing functions in the name of the subservicer for the loans underlying our MSR. As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, our MSR had a fair market value of $1.9$2.2 billion and $2.0$1.6 billion, respectively.
44

Table of Contents
As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, our MSR portfolio included MSR on 793,470796,205 and 717,167781,905 loans with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $175.9$193.8 billion and $163.1$177.9 billion, respectively. The following tables summarize certain characteristics of the loans underlying our MSR by gross weighted average coupon rate types and ranges at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands)Number of LoansUnpaid Principal BalanceWeighted Average Gross Coupon RateWeighted Average Current Loan SizeWeighted Average Loan Age (months)Weighted Average Original FICOWeighted Average Original LTV60+ Day Delinquencies3-Month CPRNet Servicing Fee (bps)
30-Year Fixed:
≤ 3.25%215,128 $72,197,662 2.8 %$395 11 767 70.7 %0.3 %10.7 %25.7 
> 3.25 - 3.75%167,615 43,576,971 3.4 %321 28 755 74.2 %0.8 %24.0 %26.3 
> 3.75 - 4.25%125,831 26,250,276 3.9 %263 54 753 75.7 %2.3 %34.0 %27.4 
> 4.25 - 4.75%79,107 14,291,435 4.4 %239 58 737 77.5 %4.4 %36.4 %26.3 
> 4.75 - 5.25%38,902 6,318,470 4.9 %230 52 722 78.9 %6.4 %37.4 %27.3 
> 5.25%15,796 2,176,065 5.5 %211 51 705 79.2 %9.2 %37.6 %30.5 
642,379 164,810,879 3.4 %332 29 756 73.4 %1.5 %22.7 %26.3 
15-Year Fixed:
≤ 2.25%16,525 5,397,141 2.0 %371 778 57.1 %0.1 %8.3 %25.2 
> 2.25 - 2.75%41,168 9,901,133 2.4 %294 13 774 58.0 %0.2 %14.2 %25.6 
> 2.75 - 3.25%46,236 7,568,257 2.9 %220 40 768 61.3 %0.4 %21.6 %26.1 
> 3.25 - 3.75%28,010 3,485,491 3.4 %172 55 758 64.3 %1.1 %26.6 %27.4 
> 3.75 - 4.25%12,685 1,302,862 3.9 %152 55 742 65.3 %2.1 %28.5 %28.8 
> 4.25%5,965 513,255 4.5 %130 47 727 66.1 %2.6 %29.4 %31.2 
150,589 28,168,139 2.7 %264 27 769 60.0 %0.5 %18.1 %26.1 
Total ARMs3,237 791,548 3.0 %315 54 762 68.0 %2.9 %29.5 %25.2 
Total796,205 $193,770,566 3.3 %$322 28 758 71.5 %1.3 %22.1 %26.3 
December 31, 2020
(dollars in thousands)Number of LoansUnpaid Principal BalanceWeighted Average Gross Coupon RateWeighted Average Current Loan SizeWeighted Average Loan Age (months)Weighted Average Original FICOWeighted Average Original LTV60+ Day Delinquencies3-Month CPRNet Servicing Fee (bps)
30-Year Fixed:
≤ 3.25%87,561 $29,304,400 2.9 %$390 769 71.8 %0.1 %9.0 %25.5 
> 3.25 - 3.75%148,065 39,634,267 3.5 %322 30 764 73.1 %1.6 %38.2 %26.3 
> 3.75 - 4.25%188,805 43,124,073 3.9 %282 44 757 76.3 %3.8 %49.1 %27.5 
> 4.25 - 4.75%130,598 26,096,168 4.4 %257 45 741 78.3 %6.2 %49.2 %26.6 
> 4.75 - 5.25%64,424 11,727,196 4.9 %249 39 727 79.6 %8.5 %46.5 %27.8 
> 5.25%25,637 3,958,181 5.5 %228 36 707 79.7 %10.8 %41.2 %30.8 
645,090 153,844,285 3.8 %305 32 755 75.3 %3.5 %42.7 %26.8 
15-Year Fixed:
≤ 2.25%1,996 665,514 2.0 %367 780 59.6 %— %7.8 %25.0 
> 2.25 - 2.75%19,260 5,256,640 2.5 %324 778 59.5 %0.1 %12.4 %25.8 
> 2.75 - 3.25%47,710 8,571,486 2.9 %239 37 771 61.9 %1.1 %27.6 %26.1 
> 3.25 - 3.75%36,327 5,223,663 3.4 %196 45 759 64.9 %2.2 %33.7 %27.6 
> 3.75 - 4.25%17,611 2,148,413 3.9 %176 43 745 65.6 %3.4 %35.1 %29.2 
> 4.25%9,149 958,531 4.5 %153 34 731 66.3 %3.6 %37.0 %31.2 
132,053 22,824,247 3.1 %243 32 766 62.5 %1.4 %28.8 %26.8 
Total ARMs4,762 1,192,951 3.3 %312 47 762 67.2 %4.3 %45.4 %25.2 
Total781,905 $177,861,483 3.7 %$297 32 756 73.6 %3.2 %41.2 %26.8 

45
 December 31, 2019
(dollars in thousands)Number of Loans Unpaid Principal Balance Fair Value % Fannie Mae Gross Weighted Average Coupon Rate Weighted Average Loan Age (months) Weighted Average Original FICO Weighted Average Original LTV 60+ Day Delinquencies 3-Month CPR Net Servicing Fee (bps)
30-Year Fixed                     
≤ 3.75%106,097
 $27,627,966
 $329,685
 71.3% 3.5% 47
 771
 70.5% 0.1% 10.5% 26.4
> 3.75 - 4.25%241,274
 59,172,782
 672,441
 64.5% 3.9% 39
 761
 76.3% 0.2% 16.1% 26.9
> 4.25 - 4.75%194,543
 43,611,524
 454,666
 65.2% 4.4% 33
 745
 78.9% 0.4% 26.4% 26.3
> 4.75 - 5.25%95,468
 19,780,323
 206,745
 65.9% 4.9% 26
 732
 80.4% 0.5% 32.9% 28.0
> 5.25%34,524
 5,987,442
 61,447
 70.5% 5.5% 24
 709
 80.2% 1.0% 30.8% 30.8
 671,906
 156,180,037
 1,724,984
 66.3% 4.2% 37
 753
 76.7% 0.3% 21.4% 26.9
15-Year Fixed                     
≤ 2.75%2,325
 464,650
 4,263
 80.8% 2.6% 46
 778
 59.7% % 8.6% 26.1
> 2.75 - 3.25%39,977
 6,893,458
 63,318
 79.9% 2.9% 48
 772
 62.2% 0.1% 11.2% 25.8
> 3.25 - 3.75%40,052
 6,311,291
 61,207
 74.0% 3.4% 40
 760
 65.0% 0.1% 15.0% 27.6
> 3.75 - 4.25%21,243
 2,990,294
 29,517
 64.2% 3.9% 32
 747
 66.0% 0.2% 19.2% 29.4
> 4.25%11,644
 1,423,018
 13,774
 61.9% 4.5% 23
 734
 66.6% 0.2% 24.8% 31.4
 115,241
 18,082,711
 172,079
 73.9% 3.4% 40
 761
 64.0% 0.1% 15.0% 27.5
Total ARMs6,323
 1,619,394
 12,381
 69.9% 3.6% 44
 762
 65.8% 0.3% 27.3% 25.2
Total793,470
 $175,882,142
 $1,909,444
 67.1% 4.1% 37
 754
 75.3% 0.3% 20.8% 27.0

67


 December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)Number of Loans Unpaid Principal Balance Fair Value % Fannie Mae Gross Weighted Average Coupon Rate Weighted Average Loan Age (months) Weighted Average Original FICO Weighted Average Original LTV 60+ Day Delinquencies 3-Month CPR Net Servicing Fee (bps)
30-Year Fixed                     
≤ 3.75%87,201
 $22,717,526
 $298,599
 76.6% 3.5% 43
 770
 69.4% 0.2% 5.6% 25.1
> 3.75 - 4.25%205,718
 50,363,220
 648,969
 69.8% 3.9% 34
 760
 75.8% 0.3% 6.9% 25.4
> 4.25 - 4.75%190,095
 44,614,930
 545,197
 66.7% 4.4% 24
 745
 79.0% 0.4% 7.5% 25.6
> 4.75 - 5.25%93,283
 20,802,919
 247,663
 65.3% 4.9% 15
 732
 80.7% 0.5% 7.5% 26.7
> 5.25%31,535
 5,911,778
 66,482
 70.2% 5.5% 14
 709
 80.5% 0.6% 9.5% 29.1
 607,832
 144,410,373
 1,806,910
 69.3% 4.2% 29
 751
 76.7% 0.3% 7.0% 25.8
15-Year Fixed                     
≤ 2.75%2,271
 505,880
 5,174
 83.5% 2.6% 35
 777
 59.3% 0.1% 5.7% 26.1
> 2.75 - 3.25%36,431
 6,505,051
 63,300
 87.0% 2.9% 42
 771
 61.5% 0.1% 7.2% 25.3
> 3.25 - 3.75%37,409
 6,144,286
 62,870
 79.4% 3.4% 33
 758
 64.4% 0.2% 8.6% 26.5
> 3.75 - 4.25%18,608
 2,781,505
 29,387
 68.6% 3.9% 25
 746
 65.8% 0.2% 9.1% 28.7
> 4.25%8,209
 1,102,846
 11,426
 63.8% 4.5% 14
 739
 67.1% 0.3% 9.4% 31.3
 102,928
 17,039,568
 172,157
 79.6% 3.4% 34
 760
 63.6% 0.2% 8.1% 26.7
Total ARMs6,407
 1,652,367
 14,373
 72.1% 3.6% 40
 763
 65.5% 0.4% 17.1% 25.2
Total717,167
 $163,102,308
 $1,993,440
 70.4% 4.1% 29
 752
 75.2% 0.3% 7.3% 25.9

Financing
Our borrowings consist primarily of repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities and term notes payable. These borrowings are collateralized by our pledge of AFS securities, derivative instruments, MSR, servicing advances and certain cash balances. Substantially all of our Agency RMBS are currently pledged as collateral, and the majoritya portion of our non-Agency securities have been pledged as collateral either throughfor repurchase agreements. Additionally, a substantial portion of our MSR is currently pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements, or FHLB advances.revolving credit facilities and term notes payable, and a portion of our servicing advances have been pledged as collateral for revolving credit facilities.
During the second quarter ofyear ended December 31, 2019, we formed a new trust entity, or the MSR Issuer Trust, for the purpose of financing MSR through securitization. On June 27, 2019, we, through the Issuer Trust, completed an MSR securitization, transaction pursuant to which, through two of our wholly owned subsidiaries, MSR is pledged to the MSR Issuer Trust and in return, the MSR Issuer Trust issued (a) an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million inissues term notes to qualified institutional buyers and (b) a variable funding note, or VFN, with a maximum principal balance of $1.0 billion to one of the subsidiaries, in each case secured on a pari passu basis. The term notes bear interest atIn connection with the transaction, we also entered into a rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 2.80% per annum. The term notes will mature on June 25, 2024 or, if extended pursuant torepurchase facility that is secured by the terms ofVFN issued in connection with the related indenture supplement, June 25, 2026 (unless earlier redeemed in accordance with their terms).MSR securitization transaction, which is collateralized by our MSR.
Additionally, on January 19, 2017, we closed an underwritten public offering of $287.5 million aggregate principal amount of 6.25%our convertible senior notes due 2022. The net2022 were issued in January 2017. Our convertible senior notes due 2026 were issued in February 2021, and a portion of the proceeds from the offering were approximately $282.2 million after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses. The majority of these proceeds were used to help fundpartially repurchase our MSR assets, which previously had largely been funded with cash.

68




6.25% per annum.
Many of our financing arrangements incorporate LIBOR as the referenced rate; however all arrangements either mature prior to the phase out of LIBOR or have provisions in place that provide for an alternative to LIBOR upon its phase-out. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Conditions and Outlook - LIBOR transition” for further discussion.
At December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, borrowings under repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities, term notes payable and convertible senior notes had the following characteristics:
(dollars in thousands)December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Borrowing TypeAmount OutstandingWeighted Average Borrowing RateWeighted Average Years to MaturityAmount OutstandingWeighted Average Borrowing RateWeighted Average Years to Maturity
Repurchase agreements$7,656,445 0.24 %0.2 $15,143,898 0.28 %0.2 
Revolving credit facilities420,761 3.46 %1.2 283,830 2.95 %1.1 
Term notes payable396,776 2.90 %2.5 395,609 2.95 %3.5 
Convertible senior notes (1)
424,827 6.25 %2.7 286,183 6.25 %1.0
Total$8,898,809 0.80 %0.5 $16,109,520 0.50 %0.3 
(dollars in thousands)December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Collateral TypeAmount OutstandingWeighted Average Borrowing RateWeighted Average Haircut on Collateral ValueAmount OutstandingWeighted Average Borrowing RateWeighted Average Haircut on Collateral Value
Agency RMBS$7,495,230 0.17 %4.2 %$15,089,726 0.28 %4.4 %
Non-Agency securities171 1.24 %43.9 %1,899 2.33 %34.3 %
Agency Derivatives36,044 0.74 %17.8 %52,273 0.89 %21.6 %
Mortgage servicing rights923,337 3.30 %27.9 %670,439 2.95 %24.6 %
Mortgage servicing advances19,200 3.23 %13.8 %9,000 3.26 %12.0 %
Other (1)
424,827 6.25 %N/A286,183 6.25 %N/A
Total$8,898,809 0.80 %6.6 %$16,109,520 0.50 %5.2 %
____________________
(1)Includes unsecured convertible senior notes due 2022 and 2026 paying interest semiannually at a rate of 6.25% per annum on the aggregate principal amount of $431.3 million.

46
(dollars in thousands) December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Borrowing Type Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Borrowing Rate Weighted Average Years to Maturity Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Borrowing Rate Weighted Average Years to Maturity
Repurchase agreements $29,147,463
 2.14% 0.2
 $23,133,476
 2.68% 0.2
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 210,000
 2.00% 3.5
 865,024
 2.53% 1.3
Revolving credit facilities 300,000
 4.26% 1.2
 310,000
 5.60% 4.2
Term notes payable 394,502
 4.59% 4.5
 
 % 
Convertible senior notes (1)
 284,954
 6.25% 2.0
 283,856
 6.25% 3.0
Total $30,336,919
 2.23% 3.9
 $24,592,356
 2.76% 3.7

(dollars in thousands) December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Collateral Type Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Borrowing Rate Weighted Average Haircut on Collateral Value Amount Outstanding Weighted Average Borrowing Rate Weighted Average Haircut on Collateral Value
Agency RMBS $27,512,526
 2.08% 4.1% $20,954,730
 2.53% 4.6%
Non-Agency securities 1,531,608
 2.90% 24.9% 2,697,254
 3.65% 24.2%
Agency Derivatives 50,714
 2.70% 26.4% 46,516
 3.34% 26.4%
Mortgage servicing rights 957,117
 4.19% 31.7% 610,000
 5.06% 40.6%
Other (1)
 284,954
 6.25% NA
 283,856
 6.25% NA
Total $30,336,919
 2.23% 6.0% $24,592,356
 2.76% 7.6%
____________________
(1)Includes unsecured convertible senior notes paying interest semiannually at a rate of 6.25% per annum on the aggregate principal amount of $287.5 million.

As of December 31, 2019,2021, the debt-to-equity ratio funding our AFS securities, MSR, servicing advances and Agency Derivatives, which includes unsecured borrowings under convertible senior notes, was 6.1:3.2:1.0. As previously discussed, our Agency RMBS, given their liquidity and high credit quality, are eligible for higher levels of leverage, while MSR, with less liquidity and/or more exposure to prepayment risk, utilize lower levels of leverage. Generally, our debt-to-equity ratio is directly correlated to the composition of our portfolio; typically, the higher the percentage of Agency RMBS we hold, the higher our debt-to-equity ratio will be. However, in addition to portfolio mix, our debt-to-equity ratio is a function of many other factors, including the liquidity of our portfolio, the availability and price of our financing, the diversification of our counterparties and their available capacity to finance our assets, and anticipated regulatory developments. We may alter the percentage allocation of our portfolio among our target assets depending on the relative value of the assets that are available to purchase from time to time, including at times when we are deploying proceeds from offerings we conduct. We believe the current degree of leverage within our portfolio helps ensure that we have access to unused borrowing capacity, thus supporting our liquidity and the strength of our balance sheet.

69




The following table provides a summary of our borrowings under repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities, term notes payable and convertible senior notes, our net TBA notional amounts and our debt-to-equity ratios for the three months ended December 31, 2019,2021, and the four immediately preceding quarters:
(dollars in thousands)
For the Three Months EndedQuarterly AverageEnd of Period BalanceMaximum Balance of Any Month-EndEnd of Period Total Borrowings to Equity RatioEnd of Period Net Long (Short) TBA Notional
End of Period Economic Debt-to-Equity Ratio (1)
December 31, 2021$7,908,651 $8,898,809 $8,898,809 3.2:1.0$4,116,000 4.7:1.0
September 30, 2021$8,888,607 $8,365,211 $9,060,624 3.1:1.0$8,742,000 6.1:1.0
June 30, 2021$11,129,575 $9,704,066 $12,837,520 3.9:1.0$6,854,000 6.5:1.0
March 31, 2021$14,016,694 $12,938,748 $14,525,894 4.8:1.0$4,800,000 6.4:1.0
December 31, 2020$16,431,516 $16,109,520 $16,842,273 5.2:1.0$5,197,000 6.8:1.0
____________________
(1)Defined as total borrowings under repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities, term notes payable and convertible senior notes, plus implied debt on net TBA notional, divided by total equity.

47

(dollars in thousands)            
For the Three Months Ended Quarterly Average End of Period Balance Maximum Balance of Any Month-End End of Period Total Borrowings to Equity Ratio End of Period Net Long (Short) TBA Notional 
End of Period Economic Debt-to-Equity Ratio (1)
December 31, 2019 $27,619,393
 $30,336,919
 $30,336,919
 6.1:1.0 $7,427,000
 7.5:1.0
September 30, 2019 $27,349,719
 $26,596,006
 $28,168,892
 5.3:1.0 $9,863,000
 7.2:1.0
June 30, 2019 $26,640,949
 $28,896,436
 $29,132,756
 5.9:1.0 $9,422,000
 7.8:1.0
March 31, 2019 $22,661,656
 $21,254,108
 $23,685,031
 4.5:1.0 $10,168,000
 6.5:1.0
December 31, 2018 $23,276,768
 $24,592,356
 $24,592,356
 5.8:1.0 $6,484,000
 7.2:1.0
Table of Contents
____________________
(1)Defined as total borrowings under repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities, term notes payable and convertible senior notes, plus implied debt on net TBA notional, divided by total equity.

Equity
The tables below provide details of our changes in stockholders’ equity from December 31, 20182020 to December 31, 20192021 as well as a reconciliation of comprehensive income and GAAP net income to non-GAAP measures. Beginning with the reporting period for the three months ended September 30, 2021, the previously reported non-GAAP measure Core Earnings will be referred to as Earnings Available for Distribution, or EAD.(1) Also beginning with the three months ended September 30, 2021, EAD includes U.S. Treasury futures income. U.S. Treasury futures income is the economic equivalent to holding and financing a relevant cheapest-to-deliver U.S. Treasury note or bond using short-term repurchase agreements.
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)Book ValueCommon Shares OutstandingCommon Book Value Per Share
Common stockholders' equity at December 31, 2020$2,087.7 273.7 $7.63 
Earnings available for distribution, net of tax benefit of $1.5 million (1)
302.7 
Dividends on preferred stock(58.5)
Earnings available for distribution to common stockholders, net of tax benefit of $1.5 million (1)
244.2 
Realized and unrealized gains and losses, net of tax expense of $5.7 million(115.4)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(455.3)
Dividend declarations(205.6)
Other11.5 0.1 
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs450.6 70.1 
Common stockholders' equity at December 31, 2021$2,017.7 343.9 $5.87 
Total preferred stock liquidation preference726.3 
Total stockholders' equity at December 31, 2021$2,744.0 
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)Book Value Common Shares Outstanding Common Book Value Per Share
Common stockholders' equity at December 31, 2018$3,253.2
 248.1
 $13.11
Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to GAAP net income and Comprehensive income:     
Core Earnings, including dollar roll income, net of tax expense of $6.8 million ⁽¹⁾437.2
    
Dividends on preferred stock(75.8)    
Core Earnings attributable to common stockholders, including dollar roll income, net of tax expense of $6.8 million ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾361.4
    
Realized and unrealized gains and losses, net of tax benefit of $20.3 million(113.3)    
Other comprehensive income, net of tax578.6
    
Dividend declaration(455.7)    
Other8.7
 0.4
  
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs336.3
 24.4
  
Common stockholders' equity at December 31, 2019$3,969.2
 272.9
 $14.54
Total preferred stock liquidation preference1,001.3
    
Total stockholders' equity at December 31, 2019$4,970.5
    

70




 Year Ended
(in millions)December 31,
2019
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$826.7
Adjustment for other comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders: 
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities(578.6)
Net income attributable to common stockholders248.1
Adjustments for non-Core Earnings: 
Other-than-temporary impairments and loss recovery adjustments22.6
Realized gain on investment securities(284.0)
Unrealized loss on investment securities3.9
Realized and unrealized losses on mortgage servicing rights408.6
Realized gain on termination or expiration of interest rate swaps, caps and swaptions(94.9)
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, caps and swaptions273.7
Gains on other derivative instruments(205.6)
Other loss1.3
Change in servicing reserves(0.7)
Non-cash equity compensation expense8.7
Net benefit for income taxes on non-Core Earnings(20.3)
Core Earnings attributable to common stockholders, including dollar roll income (1)(2)
$361.4
____________________
(1)Core Earnings, including dollar roll income, is a non-U.S. GAAP measure that we define as comprehensive income (loss)Year Ended
(in millions)December 31,
2021
Comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders excluding “realized$(326.5)
Adjustment for other comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders:
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities455.3 
Net income attributable to common stockholders128.8 
Adjustments for non-EAD (1):
Realized gains on investment securities(134.7)
Unrealized losses on investment securities3.4 
Provision for credit losses on investment securities9.8 
Realized and unrealized gains on mortgage servicing rights, net(144.6)
Realized gain on termination or expiration of interest rate swaps and losses” (impairment losses, realizedswaptions(2.4)
Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps and swaptions(25.5)
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on the aggregate portfolio, reserve expense for representation and warranty obligations on MSR and non-cash compensation expense related to restricted common stock). As defined, Core Earnings, including dollar roll income, includes interest income or expense and premium income or loss onother derivative instruments and servicing income, net of estimated amortization on MSR. Dollar roll income is the economic equivalent to holding and financing Agency RMBS using short-term repurchase agreements. Core Earnings, including dollar roll income, provides supplemental information to assist investors in analyzing the Company’s results of operations and helps facilitate comparisons to industry peers.382.7 
Other loss3.9 
(2)Beginning with the period ended June 30, 2019, the Company refined the MSR amortization method utilizedChange in the calculation of Core servicing reserves0.4 
Non-cash equity compensation expense11.5 
Other nonrecurring expenses5.2 
Net provision for income taxes on non-EAD (1)
5.7 
Earnings including dollar roll income. The new method includes an adjustmentavailable for any gain or loss on the capital useddistribution to purchase the MSR and allows Core Earnings to better reflect how the carry earned on MSR varies as a function of prepayment rates.common stockholders (1)
$244.2 


____________________
(1)EAD is a non-GAAP measure that we define as comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common stockholders, excluding “realized and unrealized gains and losses” (provision for (reversal of) credit losses, realized and unrealized gains and losses on the aggregate portfolio, reserve expense for representation and warranty obligations on MSR, non-cash compensation expense related to restricted common stock, other nonrecurring expenses and restructuring charges). As defined, EAD includes net interest income, accrual and settlement of interest on derivatives, dollar roll income on TBAs, U.S. Treasury futures income, servicing income, net of estimated amortization on MSR and recurring cash related operating expenses. Dollar roll income is the economic equivalent to holding and financing Agency RMBS using short-term repurchase agreements. U.S. Treasury futures income is the economic equivalent to holding and financing a relevant cheapest-to-deliver U.S. Treasury note or bond using short-term repurchase agreements. EAD provides supplemental information to assist investors in analyzing the Company’s results of operations and helps facilitate comparisons to industry peers. EAD is one of several measures our board of directors considers to determine the amount of dividends to declare on our common stock and should not be considered an indication of our taxable income or as a proxy for the amount of dividends we may declare.
71
48


U.S. GAAP to Estimated Taxable Income
The following tables provide reconciliations of our GAAP net income (loss) to our estimated taxable income (loss) split between our REIT and TRSs for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Year Ended December 31, 2021
(dollars in millions)TRSREITEliminationsConsolidated
GAAP net income, pre-tax$60.1 $131.3 $— $191.4 
State taxes10.6 — — 10.6 
Adjusted GAAP net income, pre-tax70.7 131.3 — 202.0 
Permanent differences
State deferred tax benefit(9.0)— — (9.0)
Other permanent differences— 0.1 — 0.1 
Temporary differences
Net accretion of OID and market discount(53.7)(59.4)— (113.1)
Net unrealized gains and losses(137.3)(31.6)— (168.9)
Net realized gains and losses on sales of RMBS— (4.9)— (4.9)
Credit loss impairment— 9.8 — 9.8 
Other temporary differences5.8 2.0 — 7.8 
Capital loss carryforward deferral— 16.6 — 16.6 
Estimated taxable (loss) income(123.5)63.9 — (59.6)
Dividend paid deduction— (63.9)— (63.9)
Estimated taxable loss post-dividend deduction$(123.5)$— $— $(123.5)
Year Ended December 31, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2020
(dollars in millions)TRS REIT Eliminations Consolidated(dollars in millions)TRSREITEliminationsConsolidated
GAAP net income (loss), pre-tax$(75.1) $347.1
 $38.4
 $310.4
GAAP net (loss) income, pre-taxGAAP net (loss) income, pre-tax$(175.7)$(1,508.9)$18.8 $(1,665.8)
State taxes(2.1) (0.5) 
 (2.6)State taxes(1.2)(0.1)— (1.3)
Adjusted GAAP net income (loss), pre-tax(77.2) 346.6
 38.4
 307.8
Adjusted GAAP net (loss) income, pre-taxAdjusted GAAP net (loss) income, pre-tax(176.9)(1,509.0)18.8 (1,667.1)
Permanent differences       Permanent differences
Intercompany RMBS sales
 
 (38.4) (38.4)Intercompany RMBS sales— — (18.8)(18.8)
Dividends from TRSs
 50.0
 
 50.0
Other permanent differences
 (8.3) 
 (8.3)Other permanent differences0.2 1.3 — 1.5 
Temporary differences       Temporary differences
Net accretion of OID and market discount(39.3) 45.8
 
 6.5
Net accretion of OID and market discount(48.7)(148.5)— (197.2)
Net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives231.0
 557.9
 
 788.9
Net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives237.7 38.9 — 276.6 
Net realized gains and losses on sales of RMBSNet realized gains and losses on sales of RMBS— (247.9)— (247.9)
Credit loss impairmentCredit loss impairment— 60.5 — 60.5 
Other temporary differences4.8
 20.9
 
 25.7
Other temporary differences2.7 5.7 — 8.4 
Capital loss carryforward (utilized) deferral(0.1) (490.6) 
 (490.7)
Net operating loss carryforward (utilized) deferral(77.9) (11.7) 
 (89.6)
Estimated taxable income41.3
 510.6
 
 551.9
Prior year undistributed taxable income
 
 
 
Dividend declaration deduction
 (510.6) 
 (510.6)
Estimated taxable income post-dividend deduction$41.3
 $
 $
 $41.3
Capital loss carryforward deferralCapital loss carryforward deferral— 1,158.5 — 1,158.5 
Estimated taxable income (loss)Estimated taxable income (loss)15.0 (640.5)— (625.5)
Dividend paid deductionDividend paid deduction— — — — 
Estimated taxable income (loss) post-dividend deductionEstimated taxable income (loss) post-dividend deduction$15.0 $(640.5)$— $(625.5)
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
(dollars in millions)TRS REIT Eliminations Consolidated
GAAP net income (loss), pre-tax$114.2
 $(59.4) $(57.3) $(2.5)
State taxes
 
 
 
Adjusted GAAP net income (loss), pre-tax114.2
 (59.4) (57.3) (2.5)
Permanent differences       
Intercompany RMBS sales
 
 57.3
 57.3
Other permanent differences
 (0.8) 
 (0.8)
Temporary differences       
Acquisition transaction costs
 82.4
 
 82.4
Net accretion of OID and market discount0.1
 76.3
 
 76.4
Net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives(68.0) (1.3) 
 (69.3)
Other temporary differences(13.3) (0.6) 
 (13.9)
Capital loss carryforward (utilized) deferral(8.0) 393.7
 
 385.7
Net operating loss carryforward (utilized) deferral(15.3) 
 
 (15.3)
Estimated taxable income9.7
 490.3
 
 500.0
Dividend declaration deduction
 (490.3) 
 (490.3)
Estimated taxable income post-dividend deduction$9.7
 $
 $
 $9.7


72




The permanent tax differences recorded in 20192021 include a difference related to officer’s compensation deduction limitations, a recurring difference in compensation expense related to restricted stock dividends paid from the Company’s TRSs to the REIT. Additionally,and vesting and state deferred tax benefit. The permanent tax differences recorded in both 2019 and 20182020 include a recurring difference related to the intercompany sales of RMBS and a recurring difference in compensation expense related to restricted stock dividends.dividends and vesting. Temporary differences recorded in 2021 and 2020 are principally timing differences between U.S. GAAP and tax accounting related to unrealized gains and losses from derivative instruments, realized and unrealized gains and losses from MSR and RMBS, accretion and amortization from Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities. Additionally,changes in reserves related to servicing advances and allowance for the year ended December 31, 2018, there were both permanent and temporary tax differences resulting from the treatmentcredit losses on certain RMBS.
49

Change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
With our accounting treatment for AFS securities, unrealized fluctuations in the market values of AFS securities, excluding Agency interest-only securities, do not impact our GAAP net (loss) income or taxable income but are recognized on our consolidated balance sheets as a change in stockholders’ equity under “accumulated other comprehensive income.” As a result of this fair value accounting through stockholders’ equity, we expect our net income to have less significant fluctuations and result in less U.S. GAAP to taxable income timing differences, than if the portfolio were accounted for as trading instruments.
Dividends
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, we declared cash dividends totaling $1.67$0.68 per share. As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to stockholders, subject to certain distribution requirements. For the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, our board of directors elected to distribute the majoritymake cash distributions in excess of ourREIT taxable income to avoid U.S. Federal Income taxes. As such, temporaryfor the year. Temporary differences between GAAP net income (loss) and taxable income can generate deterioration in book value on a permanent and temporary basis as taxable income is distributed that has not been earned for U.S. GAAP purposes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity and capital resources are managed and forecasted on a daily basis. We believe this ensures that we have sufficient liquidity to absorb market events that could negatively impact collateral valuations and result in margin calls. We also believe that it gives us the flexibility to manage our portfolio to take advantage of market opportunities.
Our principal sources of cash consist of borrowings under repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities, term notes payable, payments of principal and interest we receive on our target assets, cash generated from our operating results, and proceeds from capital market transactions. We typically use cash to repay principal and interest on our repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities and term notes payableborrowings, to purchase our target assets, to make dividend payments on our capital stock, and to fund our operations.
On March 21, 2019, we completed a public offering of 18,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $13.76 per share. On March 22, 2019, an additional 2,700,000 shares were sold to the underwriters of the offering pursuant to an overallotment option. The net proceeds were approximately $284.5 million, after deducting offering expenses of approximately $0.3 million.
To the extent that we raise additional equity capital through capital market transactions, we anticipate using cash proceeds from such transactions to purchase additional Agency RMBS, non-Agency securities, MSR and otherour target assets and for other general corporate purposes. Such general corporate purposes may include the refinancing or repayment of debt, the repurchase or redemption of common and preferred equity securities, and other capital expenditures.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, we held $558.1 million$1.2 billion in cash and cash equivalents available to support our operations; $33.5$9.4 billion of AFS securities, MSR, and derivative assets held at fair value; and $30.3$8.9 billion of outstanding debt in the form of repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, borrowings under revolving credit facilities, term notes payable and convertible senior notes. During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, the debt-to-equity ratio funding our AFS securities, MSR and Agency Derivatives, which includes unsecured borrowings under convertible senior notes, increased from 5.3:3.1:10 to 6.1:3.2:1.0 and increaseddecreased from 5.8:5.2:1.0 to 6.1:3.2:1.0, respectively. The slight increase for the three months ended December 31, 2021 was driven bydue to increased financing on Agency RMBS purchases. The decrease for the year ended December 31, 2021 was driven by decreased financing on Agency RMBS due to sales and prepayments on the related assets. During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, our economic debt-to-equity ratio funding our AFS securities, MSR and Agency Derivatives, which includes unsecured borrowings under convertible senior notes and implied debt on net TBA notional, increaseddecreased from 7.2:106.1:1.0 to 7.5:4.7:1.0 for both periods.

73




and 6.8:1.0 to 4.7:1.0, respectively.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, we held approximately $1.3$141.7 million of unpledged Agency securities and derivatives and $1.6 billion$11.9 million of unpledged non-Agency securities. As a result, we had an overall estimated unused borrowing capacity on unpledged securities of approximately $1.2 billion.$133.5 million. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we held approximately $354.6$60.8 million of unpledged MSR.MSR and $96.8 million of unpledged servicing advances. Overall, we had unused committed borrowing capacity on MSR asset and servicing advance financing facilities of $1.2 billion, which includes the repurchase facility pursuant to which the Company may finance the VFN issued in connection with the MSR securitization transaction completed on June 27, 2019.$313.4 million and $180.8 million, respectively. Generally, unused borrowing capacity may be the result of our election not to utilize certain financing, as well as delays in the timing in which funding is provided, insufficient collateral or the inability to meet lenders’ eligibility requirements for specific types of asset classes. On a daily basis, we monitor and forecast our available, or excess, liquidity. Additionally, we frequently perform shock analyses against various market events to monitor the adequacy of our excess liquidity. If borrowing rates and/or collateral requirements change in the near term, we believe we are subject to less earnings volatility than a more leveraged organization.
During the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, we did not experience any restrictions tomaterial issues accessing our funding sources, although balance sheet capacity of counterparties have tightened due to compliance with the Basel III regulatory capital reform rules as well as management of perceived risk in the current interest rate environment.sources. We expect ongoing sources of financing to be primarily repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities, term notes payable, convertible notes and similar financing arrangements. We plan to finance our assets with a moderate amount of leverage, the level of which may vary based upon the particular characteristics of our portfolio and market conditions.
50

As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had master repurchase agreements in place with 4739 counterparties (lenders), the majority of which are U.S. domiciled financial institutions, and we continue to evaluate additional counterparties to manage and optimize counterparty risk. Under our repurchase agreements, we are required to pledge additional assets as collateral to our lenders when the estimated fair value of the existing pledged collateral under such agreements declines and such lenders, through a margin call, demand additional collateral. Lenders generally make margin calls because of a perceived decline in the value of our assets collateralizing the repurchase agreements. This may occur following the monthly principal reduction of assets due to scheduled amortization and prepayments on the underlying mortgages, or may be caused by changes in market interest rates, a perceived decline in the market value of the investments and other market factors. To cover a margin call, we may pledge additional assets or cash. At maturity, any cash on deposit as collateral is generally applied against the repurchase agreement balance, thereby reducing the amount borrowed. Should the value of our assets suddenly decrease, significant margin calls on our repurchase agreements could result, causing an adverse change in our liquidity position.
The following table summarizes our repurchase agreements and counterparty geographical concentration at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)Amount Outstanding 
Net Counterparty Exposure(1)
 Percent of Funding Amount Outstanding 
Net Counterparty Exposure(1)
 Percent of Funding
North America$16,165,067
 $1,026,474
 57.6% $12,061,693
 $1,120,101
 55.4%
Europe (2)
7,519,258
 521,804
 29.3% 6,728,245
 646,000
 31.9%
Asia (2)
5,463,138
 234,180
 13.1% 4,343,538
 255,973
 12.7%
Total$29,147,463
 $1,782,458
 100.0% $23,133,476
 $2,022,074
 100.0%
____________________
(1)Represents the net carrying value of the assets sold under agreements to repurchase, including accrued interest plus any cash or assets on deposit to secure the repurchase obligation, less the amount of the repurchase liability, including accrued interest.
(2)Exposure to European and Asian domiciled banks and their U.S. subsidiaries.


74




In addition to our master repurchase agreements to fund our Agency and non-Agency securities, we have twoone repurchase facilitiesfacility and onethree revolving credit facilityfacilities that provide short- and long-term financing for our MSR portfolio. We also have one revolving credit facility that provides short-term financing for our servicing advances. An overview of the facilities is presented in the table below:
(dollars in thousands)        
December 31, 2019
Expiration Date (1)
 Committed Amount Outstanding Unused Capacity Total Capacity Eligible Collateral
June 21, 2021 
Yes (2)
 $
 $1,000,000
 $1,000,000
 
Mortgage servicing rights (3)
December 1, 2020 
Yes (2)
 $262,615
 $137,385
 $400,000
 
Mortgage servicing rights (4)
March 12, 2021 
Yes (2)
 $300,000
 $50,000
 $350,000
 Mortgage servicing rights
(dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2021
Expiration Date (1)
Amount Outstanding
Unused Committed Capacity (2)
Unused Uncommitted CapacityTotal CapacityEligible Collateral
August 31, 2022$255,311 $94,689 $350,000 $700,000 Mortgage servicing rights
June 30, 2022$125,000 $— $275,000 $400,000 
Mortgage servicing rights (3)
March 20, 2024$146,250 $78,750 $75,000 $300,000 
Mortgage servicing rights (4)
January 31, 2022$— $140,000 $— $140,000 Mortgage servicing rights
September 28, 2022$19,200 $180,800 $— $200,000 Mortgage servicing advances
____________________
(1)The facilities are set to mature on the stated expiration date, unless extended pursuant to their terms.
(2)Commitment fee charged on unused capacity.
(3)
(1)The facilities are set to mature on the stated expiration date, unless extended pursuant to their terms.
(2)Represents unused capacity amounts to which commitment fees are charged.
(3)This repurchase facility is secured by the VFN issued in connection with the MSR securitization transaction completed on June 27, 2019, which is collateralized by our MSR.
(4)This repurchase facility is secured by MSR notes, which are collateralized by our MSR.

Our wholly owned subsidiary, TH Insurance, is a member of the FHLB. As a member of the FHLB, TH Insurance has access to a variety of products and services offered by the FHLB, including secured advances. As of December 31, 2019, TH Insurance had $210.0 million in outstanding secured advances with a weighted average borrowing rate of 2.00%.
The ability to borrow from the FHLB is subject to our continued creditworthiness, pledging of sufficient eligible collateral to secure advances, and compliance with certain agreements with the FHLB. Each advance requires approval by the FHLB and is secured by collateralthe VFN issued in accordanceconnection with the FHLB’s credit and collateral guidelines, as may be revised from2019 MSR securitization transaction, which is collateralized by our MSR.
(4)The revolving period of this facility ceases on March 17, 2023, at which time to time by the FHLB. Eligible collateral may include conventional 1-4 family residential mortgage loans, Agency RMBS and certain non-Agency securities withfacility starts a rating of A and above.12-month amortization period.
In January 2016, the FHFA released a final rule regarding membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank system. Among other effects, the final rule excludes captive insurers from membership eligibility, including our subsidiary member, TH Insurance. Since TH Insurance was admitted as a member in 2013, it is eligible for a membership grace period that runs through February 19, 2021, during which new advances or renewals that mature beyond the grace period will be prohibited; however, any existing advances that mature beyond this grace period will be permitted to remain in place subject to their terms insofar as we maintain good standing with the FHLB. If any new advances or renewals occur, TH Insurance’s outstanding advances will be limited to 40% of its total assets.
We are subject to a variety of financial covenants under our lending agreements. The following represent the most restrictive financial covenants across theour lending agreements as of December 31, 2019:2021:
Total indebtedness to tangible net worth must be less than 8.0:1.0. As of December 31, 2019,2021, our total indebtedness to tangible net worth, as defined, was 6.2:3.3:1.0.
Cash liquidity must be greater than $100.0$200.0 million. As of December 31, 2019,2021, our liquidity, as defined, was $558.1 million.$1.2 billion.
Net worth must be greater than the higher of $1.5 billion or 50% of the highest net worth during the 24 calendar months prior, whichever is higher.measured beginning March 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2019,2021, 50% of the highest net worth during the 24 calendar months prior, as defined, was $2.6$1.6 billion and our net worth, as defined, was $5.0$2.7 billion.
We are also subject to additional financial covenants in connection with various other agreements we enter into in the normal course of our business. We intend to continue to operate in a manner which complies with all of our financial covenants.

7551


The following table summarizes assets at carrying values that were pledged or restricted as collateral for the future payment obligations of repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities, term notes payable and derivative instruments at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value$7,009,449 $14,633,217 
Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value2,130,807 1,146,710 
Restricted cash747,979 1,126,439 
Due from counterparties33,718 21,312 
Derivative assets, at fair value39,608 61,557 
Other assets33,767 28,540 
Total$9,995,328 $17,017,775 
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value$29,802,456
 $25,157,999
Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value1,554,825
 1,143,918
Restricted cash919,010
 416,696
Due from counterparties102,365
 110,695
Derivative assets, at fair value68,874
 70,191
U.S. Treasuries, at fair value (1)

 6,457
Total$32,447,530
 $26,905,956
____________________
(1)U.S. Treasuries received as collateral and re-pledged.

Although we generally intend to hold our target assets as long-term investments, we may sell certain of our assets in order to manage our interest rate risk and liquidity needs, to meet other operating objectives and to adapt to market conditions. Our Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities are generally actively traded and thus, in most circumstances, readily liquid. However, certain of our assets, including MSR, are subject to longer trade timelines, and, as a result, market conditions could significantly and adversely affect the liquidity of our assets. Any illiquidity of our assets may make it difficult for us to sell such assets if the need or desire arises. Our ability to quickly sell certain assets, such as MSR may be limited by delays encountered while obtaining certain regulatory approvals required for such dispositions and may be further limited by delays due to the time period needed for negotiating transaction documents, conducting diligence, and complying with regulatory requirements regarding the transfer of such assets before settlement may occur. Consequently, even if we identify a buyer for our MSR, there is no assurance that we would be able to quickly sell such assets if the need or desire arises.
In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we previously recorded our assets. Assets that are illiquid are more difficult to finance, and to the extent that we use leverage to finance assets that become illiquid, we may lose that leverage or have it reduced. Assets tend to become less liquid during times of financial stress, which is often the time that liquidity is most needed. As a result, our ability to sell assets or vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be limited by liquidity constraints, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We cannot predict the timing and impact of future sales of our assets, if any. Because many of our assets are financed with repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities and term notes payable, a significant portion of the proceeds from sales of our assets (if any), prepayments and scheduled amortization are used to repay balances under these financing sources.
The following table provides the maturities of our repurchase agreements, FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities, term notes payable and convertible senior notes as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 20182020:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Within 30 days$1,771,027 $5,370,506 
30 to 59 days1,807,544 4,292,861 
60 to 89 days1,981,056 2,062,234 
90 to 119 days1,249,435 1,610,198 
120 to 364 days1,265,638 1,868,099 
One to three years543,026 510,013 
Three to five years281,083 395,609 
Total$8,898,809 $16,109,520 
:
52
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Within 30 days$5,465,916
 $7,488,869
30 to 59 days6,300,372
 5,077,598
60 to 89 days6,687,285
 5,655,060
90 to 119 days4,740,217
 1,938,859
120 to 364 days6,113,673
 3,508,114
One to three years584,954
 300,000
Three to five years394,502
 573,856
Five to ten years
 
Ten years and over50,000
 50,000
Total$30,336,919
 $24,592,356


76


As of the date of this filing, we have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy all of our short-term recourse liabilities and to satisfy covenants in our financing documents. With respect to the next twelve months, we expect that our cash on hand combined with the cash flow provided by our operations will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated liquidity needs with respect to our current investment portfolio, including related financings, potential margin calls and operating expenses. While it is inherently more difficult to forecast beyond the next twelve months, we currently expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through our cash on hand and, if needed, additional borrowings, proceeds received from repurchase agreements and other financing arrangements, proceeds from capital market transactions and the liquidation or refinancing of our assets.
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, our restricted and unrestricted cash balance increaseddecreased approximately $519.1$557.8 million to $1.6$2.1 billion at December 31, 2019.2021. The cash movements can be summarized by the following:
Cash flows from operating activities. For the year ended December 31, 2019, operating activities increased our cash balances by approximately $1.1 billion,
Cash flows from operating activities. For the year ended December 31, 2021, operating activities increased our cash balances by approximately $423.5 million, primarily driven by our financial results for the year.
Cash flows from investing activities. For the year ended December 31, 2019, investing activities decreased our cash balances by approximately $6.1 billion, primarily driven by purchases of MSR and AFS securities.
Cash flows from financing activities. For the year ended December 31, 2019, financing activities increased our cash balance by approximately $5.5 billion, primarily driven by increases in repurchase agreements as a result of purchases of AFS securities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not participated in transactions that create relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities or entered into any commitment or intent to provide funding to any such entities.year.

Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the effect on our liquidity and cashCash flows from contractual obligations forinvesting activities. For the year ended December 31, 2021, investing activities increased our cash balances by approximately $6.3 billion, primarily driven by proceeds from sales of and principal payments on AFS securities, offset by purchases of AFS securities and MSR.
Cash flows from financing activities. For the year ended December 31, 2021, financing activities decreased our cash balance by approximately $7.3 billion, primarily driven by decreases in repurchase agreements FHLB advances, revolving credit facilities, convertible senior notes, interest expenseas a result of sales of and principal payments on borrowings, our non-cancelable office leases, net of contractual subleases, and management fees payable under our management agreement:AFS securities.

 Due During the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total
Repurchase agreements$29,147,463
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $29,147,463
Federal Home Loan Bank advances160,000
 
 
 
 
 50,000
 210,000
Revolving credit facilities
 300,000
 
 
 
 
 300,000
Convertible senior notes
 
 284,954
 
 
 
 284,954
Interest expense on borrowings(1)
153,525
 21,761
 2,043
 1,305
 1,305
 12,785
 192,724
Long-term operating lease obligations1,616
 1,523
 1,003
 327
 
 
 4,469
Management fee - PRCM Advisers(2)
245,826
 
 
 
 
 
 245,826
Total$29,708,430
 $323,284
 $288,000
 $1,632
 $1,305
 $62,785
 $30,385,436
____________________
(1)Interest expense on borrowings calculated based on rates at December 31, 2019.
(2)Contractual obligation for the management fee is estimated through the contract expiration date of October 28, 2020, inclusive of the termination fee as defined in the management agreement between us and PRCM Advisers. Disclosure assumes the agreement is not renewed pursuant to its terms and that the effective termination date is October 28, 2020.

We are party to a management agreement with PRCM Advisers, pursuant to which PRCM Advisers is entitled to receive a management fee and the reimbursement of certain expenses from us. We reimburse PRCM Advisers for (i) our allocable share of the compensation paid by PRCM Advisers to its personnel serving as our principal financial officer and general counsel and personnel employed by PRCM Advisers as in-house legal, tax, accounting, consulting, auditing, administrative, information technology, valuation, computer programming and development and back-office resources to us, and (ii) any amounts for personnel of PRCM Advisers’ affiliates arising under a shared facilities and services agreement. We also have certain costs allocated to us by PRCM Advisers for data services and technology, but most direct expenses with third-party vendors are paid directly by us.
We are also party to contracts that contain a variety of indemnification obligations, principally with brokers, underwriters, counterparties to lending agreements and investors in the RMBS we issued in connection with our previous residential mortgage loan securitization transactions, the term notes we issued in connection with our MSR securitization and the loans

77




underlying our MSR. The maximum potential future payment amount we could be required to pay under these indemnification obligations may be unlimited.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Inflation
Substantially all of our assets and liabilities are financial in nature. As a result, changes in interest rates and other factors impact our performance far more than does inflation.inflation, although inflation rates can often have a meaningful influence over the direction of interest rates. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and dividends are based upon net ordinary income and capital gains as calculated for tax purposes; in each case, our results of operations and reported assets, liabilities and equity are measured with reference to historical cost or fair value without considering inflation.

Other Matters
We intend to conduct our business so as to maintain our exempt status under, and not to become regulated as, an investment company for purposes of the 1940 Act. If we failed to maintain our exempt status under the 1940 Act and became regulated as an investment company, our ability to, among other things, use leverage would be substantially reduced and, as a result, we would be unable to conduct our business as described in Item 1, Business - Other Business - Regulation” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, we monitor our compliance with both the 55% Test and the 80% Tests of the 1940 Act in order to maintain our exempt status. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we determined that we maintained compliance with both the 55% Test and the 80% Test requirements.
We calculate that at least 75% of our assets were qualified REIT assets, as defined in the Code for the year ended December 31, 2019.2021. We also calculate that our revenue qualifiesqualified for the 75% source of income test and for the 95% source of income test rules for the year ended December 31, 2019.2021. Consequently, we met the REIT income and asset tests. We also met all REIT requirements regarding the ownership of our common stock and the distribution of our net income. Therefore, for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, we believe that we qualified as a REIT under the Code.
The TCJA made many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to businesses, including REITs and TRSs. Pursuant to the TCJA, as of January 1, 2018, the federal income tax rate applicable to corporations was reduced to 21% and the corporate alternative minimum tax was repealed. In addition, the deduction of net interest expense is limited for all businesses; provided that certain businesses, including real estate businesses, may elect not to be subject to such limitations and instead to depreciate their real property related assets over longer depreciable lives. This limitation could adversely affect our TRSs.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We seek to manage our risks related to the credit quality of our assets, interest rates, liquidity, prepayment speeds and market value while providing an opportunity to stockholders to realize attractive risk-adjusted total return through ownership of our capital stock. Although we do not seek to avoid risk completely, we believe that risk can be quantified from historical experience, and we seek to manage our risk levels in order to earn sufficient compensation to justify the risks we undertake and to maintain capital levels consistent with taking such risks.
To reducemanage the risks to our portfolio, we employ portfolio-wide and asset-specific risk measurement and management processes in our daily operations. Risk management tools include software and services licensed or purchased from third parties as well as proprietary and third-party analytical tools and models. There can be no guarantee that these tools and methods will protect us from market risks.
53

Interest Rate Risk
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including fiscal and monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political considerations, as well as other factors beyond our control. We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our assets and related financing obligations.
LIBOR and other indices which had been deemed “benchmarks” for various commercial and financial contracts have been the subject of recent national, international, and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform, and it appears likely that LIBOR will be phased out or the methodology for determining LIBOR will be modified by June 2023. We currently have agreements that are indexed to LIBOR and are monitoring related reform proposals and evaluating the related risks; however, it is not possible to predict the effects of any of these developments, and any future initiatives to regulate, reform or change the manner of administration of LIBOR could result in adverse consequences to the rate of interest payable and receivable on, market value of and market liquidity for LIBOR-based financial instruments. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Conditions and Outlook - LIBOR transition” for further discussion.
Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, we engage in a variety of interest rate risk management techniques that seek to mitigate the influence of interest rate changes on the values of our assets.

78




We may enter into a variety of derivative and non-derivative instruments to economically hedge interest rate risk or “duration mismatch (or gap)” by adjusting the duration of our floating-rate borrowings into fixed-rate borrowings to more closely match the duration of our assets. This particularly applies to borrowing agreements with maturities or interest rate resets of less than six months. Typically, the interest receivable terms (i.e., LIBOR)LIBOR, OIS or SOFR) of certain derivatives match the terms of the underlying debt, resulting in an effective conversion of the rate of the related borrowing agreement from floating to fixed. The objective is to manage the cash flows associated with current and anticipated interest payments on borrowings, as well as the ability to roll or refinance borrowings at the desired amount by adjusting the duration. To help manage the adverse impact of interest rate changes on the value of our portfolio as well as our cash flows, we may, at times, enter into various forward contracts, including short securities, Agency to-be-announced securities, or TBAs, options, futures, swaps, caps, credit default swaps and total return swaps. In executing on the Company’sour current interest rate risk management strategy, the Company haswe have entered into TBAs, put and call options for TBAs, interest rate swap cap and swaption agreements and U.S. Treasury futures and Markit IOS total return swaps.Eurodollar futures. In addition, because MSR are negative duration assets, they provide a hedge to interest rate exposure on our Agency RMBS portfolio. In hedging interest rate risk, we seek to reduce the risk of losses on the value of our investments that may result from changes in interest rates in the broader markets, improve risk-adjusted returns and, where possible, obtain a favorable spread between the yield on our assets and the cost of our financing.
Income of a REIT income arising from “clearly identified” hedging transactions that are entered into to manage the risk of interest rate or price changes with respect to borrowings, including gain from the disposition of such hedging transactions, to the extent the hedging transactions hedge indebtedness incurred, or to be incurred, by the REIT to acquire or carry real estate assets, will not be treated as gross income for purposes of either the 75% or the 95% gross income tests. In general, for a hedging transaction to be “clearly identified,” (i) it must be identified as a hedging transaction before the end of the day on which it is acquired, originated, or entered into; and (ii) the items of risks being hedged must be identified “substantially contemporaneously” with entering into the hedging transaction (generally not more than 35 days after entering into the hedging transaction). We intend to structure any hedging transactions in a manner that does not jeopardize our qualification as a REIT, although this determination depends on an analysis of the facts and circumstances concerning each hedging transaction. We also implement part of our hedging strategy through our TRSs, which are subject to U.S. federal, state and, if applicable, local income tax.
We intend to treat our TBAs as qualifying assets for purposes of the 75% asset test, to the extent set forth in an opinion from Sidley Austin LLP substantially to the effect that, for purposes of the 75% asset test, our ownership of a TBA should be treated as ownership of the underlying Agency RMBS, and toRMBS. We also treat income and gains from our TBAs as qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, to the extent set forth in an opinion from Sidley Austin LLP substantially to the effect that, for purposes of the 75% gross income test, any gain recognized by us in connection with the settlement of our TBAs should be treated as gain from the sale or disposition of the underlying Agency RMBS.
Interest Rate Effect on Net Interest Income
Our operating results depend in large part on differences between the income earned on our assets and our cost of borrowing and hedging activities. The costs associated with our borrowings are generally based on prevailing market interest rates. During a period of rising interest rates, our borrowing costs generally will increase while the coupon interest earned on our existing portfolio of leveraged fixed-rate Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities will remain static. Moreover, interest rates may rise at a faster pace than the yields earned on our leveraged adjustable-rate and hybrid securities. Both of these factors could result in a decline in our net interest spread and net interest margin. The inverse result may occur during a period of falling interest rates. The severity of any such decline or increase in our net interest spread and net interest margin would depend on our asset/liability composition at the time, as well as the magnitude and duration of the interest rate increase or decrease. Additionally, an increase in short-term interest rates could have a negative impact on the market value of our target assets, while a decrease in short-term interest rates could have a positive impact on the market value of our target assets. Any resulting negative impact to net income could adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations.
Our hedging techniques are partly based on assumed levels of prepayments of our target assets. If prepayments are slower or faster than assumed, the life of the investment will be longer or shorter, which could reduce the effectiveness of any hedging strategies we may use and may cause losses on such transactions. Hedging strategies involving the use of derivative securities are highly complex and may produce volatile returns.

7954


We acquire adjustable-rate and hybrid Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities. These are assets in which some of the underlying mortgages are typically subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps and floors, which may limit the amount by which the security’s interest yield may change during any given period. However, our borrowing costs pursuant to our financing agreements are not subject to similar restrictions. Therefore, in a period of increasing interest rates, interest rate costs on our borrowings could increase without limitation, while the interest-rate yields on our adjustable-rate and hybrid securities could effectively be limited by caps. This issue will be magnified to the extent we acquire adjustable-rate and hybrid securities that are not based on mortgages that are fully indexed. In addition, adjustable-rate and hybrid securities may be subject to periodic payment caps that result in some portion of the interest being deferred and added to the principal outstanding. If this happens, we could receive less cash income on such assets than we would need to pay for interest costs on our related borrowings. These factors could lower our net interest income or cause a net loss during periods of rising interest rates, which would harm our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Interest Rate Mismatch Risk
We fund the majority of our adjustable-rate and hybrid Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities with borrowings that are based on LIBOR, while the interest rates on these assets may be indexed to other index rates, such as the one-year Constant Maturity Treasury index, or CMT, the Monthly Treasury Average index, or MTA, or the 11th District Cost of Funds Index, or COFI. Accordingly, any increase in LIBOR relative to these indices may result in an increase in our borrowing costs that is not matched by a corresponding increase in the interest earnings on these assets. Any such interest rate index mismatch could adversely affect our profitability, which may negatively impact distributions to our stockholders. To mitigate interest rate mismatches, we utilize the hedging strategies discussed above.
The following table provides the indices of our variable rate Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, based on carrying value (dollars in thousands).
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Index Type Floating 
Hybrid (1)
 Total Index % Floating 
Hybrid (1)
 Total Index %
CMT $
 $11,884
 $11,884
 % $9,502
 $15,423
 $24,925
 1%
LIBOR 3,247,387
 8,400
 3,255,787
 94% 3,374,141
 9,278
 3,383,419
 93%
Other (2)
 44,824
 164,635
 209,459
 6% 50,597
 165,054
 215,651
 6%
Total $3,292,211
 $184,919
 $3,477,130
 100% $3,434,240
 $189,755
 $3,623,995
 100%
____________________
(1)“Hybrid” amounts reflect those assets with greater than twelve months to reset.
(2)“Other” includes COFI, MTA and other indices.

The following analyses of risks are based on our experience, estimates, models and assumptions. The analysis is based on models which utilize estimates of fair value and interest rate sensitivity. Actual economic conditions or implementation of decisions may produce results that differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used in our models.
We perform interest rate sensitivity analyses on various measures of our financial results and condition by examining how our assets, financing, and hedges will perform in various interest rate “shock” scenarios. Two of these measures are presented below in more detail. The first measure is change in annualized net interest income over the next 12 months, including interest spread from our interest rate swaps and caps and float income from custodial accounts associated with our MSR. The second measure is change in value of financial position, including the value of our derivative assets and liabilities. All changes in value are measured as the change from the December 31, 20192021 financial position. All projected changes in annualized net interest income are measured as the change from the projected annualized net interest income based off current performance returns.
Computation of the cash flows for the rate-sensitive assets underpinning change in annualized net interest income are based on assumptions related to, among other things, prepayment speeds, yield on future acquisitions, slope of the yield curve, and size of the portfolio. (The assumption for prepayment speeds for Agency RMBS, non-Agency securities, and MSR, for example, is that they do not change in response to changes in interest rates.) Assumptions for the interest rate sensitive liabilities relate to, among other things, collateral requirements as a percentage of borrowings and amount/term of borrowing. These assumptions may not hold in practice; realized net interest income results may therefore be significantly different from the net interest income produced in scenario analyses. We also note that the uncertainty associated with the estimate of a change in net interest income is directly related to the size of interest rate move considered.

80




Computation of results for portfolio value involves a two-step process. The first is the use of models to project how the value of interest rate sensitive instruments will change in the scenarios considered. The second, and equally important, step is the improvement of the model projections based on application of our experience in assessing how current market and macroeconomic conditions will affect the prices of various interest rate sensitive instruments. Judgment is best applied to localized (less than 25 basis points, or bps) interest rate moves. The more an instantaneous interest rate move exceeds 25 bps, the greater the likelihood that accompanying market events are significant enough to warrant reconsideration of interest rate sensitivities. As with net interest income, the uncertainty associated with the estimate of change in portfolio value is therefore directly related to the size of interest rate move considered.
55

The following interest rate sensitivity table displays the potential impact of instantaneous, parallel changes in interest rates of +/- 25 and +/- 50 bps on annualized net interest income and portfolio value, based on our interest sensitive financial instruments at December 31, 2019.2021. The preceding discussion shows that the results for the 25 bps move scenarios are the best representation of our interest rate exposure, followed by those for the 50 bps move scenarios. This hierarchy reflects our localized approach to managing interest rate risk: monitoring rates and rebalancing our hedges on a day to day basis, where rate moves only rarely exceed 25 bps in either direction.
Changes in Interest RatesChanges in Interest Rates
(dollars in thousands)-50 bps -25 bps +25 bps +50 bps(dollars in thousands)-50 bps-25 bps+25 bps+50 bps
Change in annualized net interest income (1):
$(14,670) $(7,363) $7,345
 $14,690
Change in annualized net interest income (1):
$(8,777)$(4,229)$3,655 $7,381 
% change in net interest income (1)
(3.0)% (1.5)% 1.5 % 3.0 %
% change in net interest income (1)
(4.4)%(2.1)%1.8 %3.7 %
Change in value of financial position:       Change in value of financial position:
Available-for-sale securities$384,030
 $190,968
 $(222,976) $(507,398)Available-for-sale securities$49,639 $28,076 $(35,802)$(79,717)
As a % of common equity9.7 % 4.8 % (5.6)% (12.8)%As a % of common equity2.5 %1.4 %(1.8)%(4.0)%
Mortgage servicing rights$(270,100) $(135,821) $130,899
 $250,616
As a % of common equity(6.8)% (3.4)% 3.3 % 6.3 %
Mortgage servicing rights (2)
Mortgage servicing rights (2)
$(250,133)$(114,470)$103,076 $183,561 
As a % of common equity (2)
As a % of common equity (2)
(12.4)%(5.6)%5.1 %9.1 %
Derivatives, net$(100,978) $(40,174) $46,526
 $126,802
Derivatives, net$138,563 $75,018 $(84,127)$(173,752)
As a % of common equity(2.5)% (1.0)% 1.2 % 3.2 %As a % of common equity6.9 %3.7 %(4.2)%(8.6)%
Reverse repurchase agreements$46
 $23
 $(23) $(46)Reverse repurchase agreements$28 $14 $(14)$(28)
As a % of common equity %  %  %  %As a % of common equity— %— %— %— %
Repurchase agreements$(30,532) $(15,266) $15,266
 $30,532
Repurchase agreements$(7,535)$(3,767)$3,767 $7,471 
As a % of common equity(0.8)% (0.4)% 0.4 % 0.8 %As a % of common equity(0.4)%(0.2)%0.2 %0.4 %
Federal Home Loan Bank advances$(44) $(22) $22
 $44
As a % of common equity %  %  %  %
Revolving credit facilities$(63) $(31) $31
 $63
Revolving credit facilities$(62)$(31)$31 $62 
As a % of common equity %  %  %  %As a % of common equity— %— %— %— %
Term notes payable$(126) $(63) $63
 $126
Term notes payable$(1,054)$(382)$205 $335 
As a % of common equity %  %  %  %As a % of common equity(0.1)%— %— %— %
Convertible senior notes$(2,518) $(1,255) $1,248
 $2,487
Convertible senior notes$(2,149)$(1,075)$1,039 $2,077 
As a % of common equity(0.1)%  %  % 0.1 %As a % of common equity(0.1)%(0.1)%0.1 %0.1 %
Total Net Assets$(20,285) $(1,641) $(28,944) $(96,774)Total Net Assets$(72,703)$(16,617)$(11,825)$(59,991)
As a % of total assets(0.1)%  % (0.1)% (0.3)%As a % of total assets(0.6)%(0.1)%(0.1)%(0.5)%
As a % of common equity(0.5)%  % (0.7)% (2.4)%As a % of common equity(3.6)%(0.8)%(0.6)%(3.0)%
____________________
(1)Amounts include the effect of interest spread from our interest rate swaps and caps and float income from custodial accounts associated with our MSR, but do not reflect any potential changes to dollar roll income associated with our TBA positions, which are accounted for as derivative instruments in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
(1)Amounts include the effect of interest spread from our interest rate swaps and float income from custodial accounts associated with our MSR, but do not reflect any potential changes to dollar roll income associated with our TBA positions, which are accounted for as derivative instruments in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
(2)Includes the effect of unsettled MSR.

Certain assumptions have been made in connection with the calculation of the information set forth in the foregoing interest rate sensitivity table and, as such, there can be no assurance that assumed events will occur or that other events will not occur that would affect the outcomes. The base interest rate scenario assumes interest rates at December 31, 2019.2021. As discussed, the analysis utilizes assumptions and estimates based on our experience and judgment. Furthermore, future purchases and sales of assets could materially change our interest rate risk profile.

81




The information set forth in the interest rate sensitivity table above and all related disclosures constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. While this table reflects the estimated impact of interest rate changes on the static portfolio, we actively manage our portfolio and continuously make adjustments to the size and composition of our asset and hedge portfolio. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimated in the foregoing interest rate sensitivity table.
Prepayment Risk
Prepayment risk is the risk that principal will be repaid at a different rate than anticipated. As we receive prepayments of principal on our Agency RMBS, and non-Agency securities, premiums paid on such assets will be amortized against interest income. In general, an increase in prepayment rates will accelerate the amortization of purchase premiums, thereby reducing the interest income earned on the assets. Conversely, discounts on such assets are accreted into interest income. In general, an increase in prepayment rates will accelerate the accretion
56

Table of purchase discounts, thereby increasing the interest income earned on the assets.Contents
We believe that we will be able to reinvest proceeds from scheduled principal payments and prepayments at acceptable yields; however, no assurances can be given that, should significant prepayments occur, market conditions would be such that acceptable investments could be identified and the proceeds timely reinvested.
MSR are also subject to prepayment risk in that, generally, an increase in prepayment rates would result in a decline in value of the MSR.
Market Risk
Market Value Risk. Our AFS securities are reflected at their estimated fair value, with the difference between amortized cost net of allowance for credit losses and estimated fair value for all AFS securities except Agencycertain interest-only securities reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. The estimated fair value of these securities fluctuates primarily due to changes in interest rates, market valuation of credit risks, and other factors. Generally, in a rising interest rate environment, we would expect the fair value of these securities to decrease; conversely, in a decreasing interest rate environment, we would expect the fair value of these securities to increase. As market volatility increases or liquidity decreases, the fair value of our assets may be adversely impacted.
Our MSR are reflected at their estimated fair value. The estimated fair value fluctuates primarily due to changes in interest rates and other factors. Generally, in a rising interest rate environment, we would expect prepayments to decrease resulting in an increase inand the fair value of our MSR.MSR to increase. Conversely, in a decreasing interest rate environment, we would expect prepayments to increase resulting in a decline inand the fair value.value of our MSR to decrease.
Real estate riskEstate Risk. Residential property values are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including national, regional and local economic conditions; local real estate conditions (such as the supply of housing); changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; construction quality, age and design; demographic factors; retroactive changes to building or similar codes; and natural disasters and other catastrophes. Decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral for residential mortgage loans and the potential proceeds available to borrowers to repay the loans, which could cause us to suffer losses on our non-Agency securities and may increase costs to service the residential mortgage loans underlying our MSR.
Liquidity Risk
Our liquidity risk is principally associated with our financing of long-maturity assets with shorter-term borrowings in the form of repurchase agreements FHLB advances and borrowings under revolving credit facilities. Although the interest rate adjustments of these assets and liabilities fall within the guidelines established by our operating policies, maturities are not required to be, nor are they, matched.
Should the value of our assets pledged as collateral suddenly decrease, lender margin calls could increase, causing an adverse change in our liquidity position. Moreover, the portfolio construction of MSR, which generally have negative duration, combined with levered RMBS, which generally have positive duration, may in certain market scenarios lead to variation margin calls, which could negatively impact our excess cash position. Additionally, if the FHLB or one or more of our repurchase agreement or revolving credit facility counterparties chose not to provide ongoing funding, our ability to finance would decline or exist at possibly less advantageous terms. As such, we cannot assureprovide assurance that we will always be able to roll over our repurchase agreements FHLB advances and revolving credit facilities. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this Annual Report on 10-K 10-K for further information about our liquidity and capital resource management.

82




record for the MSR assets in our portfolio, we may be responsible for continuing to advance principal, interest, taxes and insurance on mortgage loans that are in forbearance, delinquency or default. Although the potential aggregate size of the servicing advance obligation is not known, at this time we believe we will be well positioned from a liquidity standpoint, through a combination of excess cash and financing facilities, to continue to make servicing advances in the future. Further, a significant number of borrowers, who were previously eligible for forbearance plan extensions, have reached or are reaching their terminal forbearance plan expiration. This has led to improvement in actual and projected forbearance; however, over time, delinquencies and defaults in our MSR portfolio could increase if borrowers who were in forbearance are unable to resume making their monthly mortgage payments.
Credit Risk
We believe that our investment strategy will generally keep our risk of credit losses low to moderate. However, we retain the risk of potential credit losses on all of the loans underlying our non-Agency securities. With respect to our non-Agency securities that are senior in the credit structure, credit support contained in deal structures provide a level of protection from losses. We seek to manage the remaining credit risk through our pre-acquisition due diligence process, which includes comprehensive underwriting, and by factoring assumed credit losses into the purchase prices we pay for non-Agency securities. In addition, with respect to any particular target asset, we evaluate relative valuation, supply and demand trends, shape of yield curves, prepayment rates, delinquency and default rates, recovery of various sectors and vintage of collateral. At times, we enter into credit default swaps or other derivative instruments in an attempt to manage our credit risk. Nevertheless, unanticipated credit losses could adversely affect our operating results.

83
57




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES


58
84




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors
of Two Harbors Investment Corp.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (the Company) as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income, (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 26, 202028, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Valuation of Level 3 Fair Value Measurement

Description of the Matter
At December 31, 2019,2021, the Company held $33.5 billion of assets recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Of this amount, $0.2 billion of available-for-sale securities and $1.9$2.2 billion of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) which are classified as Level 3reported at fair value measurements in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.value. As more fully described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company utilizes third-party pricing vendors or other applicable market data inputs in the fair value measurement of its Level 3 assets. For available-for-sale securities, significantMSR portfolio. Significant unobservable market data inputs inherent in the prices obtained fromdetermined by the third-party pricing vendors include prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, and credit losses. For mortgage servicing rights, significant unobservable market data inputs inherent in the prices obtained from third-party pricing vendors include prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, discount rates,option-adjusted spread, or OAS, and cost to service. Significant increases or decreases in these inputs in isolation may result in significantly lower or higher fair value measurements.
Auditing the Company’s valuation of Level 3 assetsthe MSR portfolio was especially challenging because the valuation involved significant judgement due to the unobservable inputs used in the valuation of these assets.this portfolio. These subjective assumptions consider a number of factors that are affected by market, economic, and asset-specific conditions.

8559


How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
Our audit procedures related to the fair value of Level 3 assetsthe MSR portfolio included the following procedures, among others. We obtained an understanding of the Level 3MSR fair value measurements process, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of internal controls. This included testing controls over management’s review of the third-party pricing vendors’ qualifications and methodologies applied. We also tested controls over management’s evaluation of pricing information obtained from third-party pricing vendors, including the consideration of applicable market data.

To test the fair value of the Company’s Level 3MSR fair value measurements, our audit procedures included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of data used in the fair value measurement process and involving our internal valuation specialists to independently develop a fair value estimatesestimate for a sample of assets classified as Level 3 fair value measurementsthe MSR portfolio using independently developed cash flow models and assumptions including consideration of market transactions. We compared our independently developed fair value estimatesestimate to the Company’s valuations. In addition, to identify potential sources of contrary information, we performed back-testing of sales of these assets that occurred after December 31, 2019.

valuation.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 26, 2020

28, 2022
86
60




TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
 December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
ASSETS   
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value$31,406,328
 $25,552,604
Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value1,909,444
 1,993,440
Cash and cash equivalents558,136
 409,758
Restricted cash1,058,690
 688,006
Accrued interest receivable92,634
 86,589
Due from counterparties318,963
 154,626
Derivative assets, at fair value188,051
 319,981
Reverse repurchase agreements220,000
 761,815
Other assets169,376
 165,660
Total Assets (1)
$35,921,622
 $30,132,479
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Liabilities   
Repurchase agreements$29,147,463
 $23,133,476
Federal Home Loan Bank advances210,000
 865,024
Revolving credit facilities300,000
 310,000
Term notes payable394,502
 
Convertible senior notes284,954
 283,856
Derivative liabilities, at fair value6,740
 820,590
Due to counterparties259,447
 130,210
Dividends payable128,125
 135,551
Accrued interest payable149,626
 160,005
Other liabilities70,299
 39,278
Total Liabilities (1)
30,951,156
 25,877,990
Stockholders’ Equity   
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized and 40,050,000 and 40,050,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively ($1,001,250 and $1,001,250 liquidation preference, respectively)977,501
 977,501
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 450,000,000 shares authorized and 272,935,731 and 248,085,721 shares issued and outstanding, respectively2,729
 2,481
Additional paid-in capital5,154,764
 4,809,616
Accumulated other comprehensive income689,400
 110,817
Cumulative earnings2,655,891
 2,332,371
Cumulative distributions to stockholders(4,509,819) (3,978,297)
Total Stockholders’ Equity4,970,466
 4,254,489
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$35,921,622
 $30,132,479

December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
ASSETS
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value (amortized cost $7,005,013 and $14,043,175, respectively; allowance for credit losses $14,238 and $22,528, respectively)$7,161,703 $14,650,922 
Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value2,191,578 1,596,153 
Cash and cash equivalents1,153,856 1,384,764 
Restricted cash934,814 1,261,667 
Accrued interest receivable26,266 47,174 
Due from counterparties168,449 146,433 
Derivative assets, at fair value80,134 95,937 
Reverse repurchase agreements134,682 91,525 
Other assets262,823 241,346 
Total Assets (1)
$12,114,305 $19,515,921 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Repurchase agreements$7,656,445 $15,143,898 
Revolving credit facilities420,761 283,830 
Term notes payable396,776 395,609 
Convertible senior notes424,827 286,183 
Derivative liabilities, at fair value53,658 11,058 
Due to counterparties196,627 135,838 
Dividends payable72,412 65,480 
Accrued interest payable18,382 21,666 
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 15)— — 
Other liabilities130,464 83,433 
Total Liabilities (1)
9,370,352 16,426,995 
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 29,050,000 and 40,050,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively ($726,250 and $1,001,250 liquidation preference, respectively)702,550 977,501 
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 700,000,000 shares authorized and 343,911,324 and 273,703,882 shares issued and outstanding, respectively3,439 2,737 
Additional paid-in capital5,625,179 5,163,794 
Accumulated other comprehensive income186,346 641,601 
Cumulative earnings1,212,983 1,025,756 
Cumulative distributions to stockholders(4,986,544)(4,722,463)
Total Stockholders’ Equity2,743,953 3,088,926 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$12,114,305 $19,515,921 
____________________
(1)
The consolidated balance sheets include assets and liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities, or VIEs. At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, assets of the VIEs totaled $395,008 and $0, and liabilities of the VIEs totaled $395,008 and $0, respectively. See Note 3 - Variable Interest Entities for additional information.
The accompanying notes are an integral partconsolidated balance sheets include assets and liabilities of these consolidated financial statements.variable interest entities, or VIEs. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, assets of the VIEs totaled $454,596 and $496,810, and liabilities of the VIEs totaled $440,030 and $477,270, respectively. See Note 3 - Variable Interest Entities for additional information.

87




TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands, except share data)
 Year Ended
 December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Interest income:     
Available-for-sale securities$962,283
 $847,325
 $631,853
Residential mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts
 
 102,886
Other32,407
 22,707
 10,350
Total interest income994,690
 870,032
 745,089
Interest expense:     
Repurchase agreements654,280
 469,437
 210,430
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts
 
 82,573
Federal Home Loan Bank advances10,920
 20,417
 36,911
Revolving credit facilities19,354
 10,820
 2,341
Term notes payable10,708
 
 
Convertible senior notes19,067
 18,997
 17,933
Total interest expense714,329
 519,671
 350,188
Net interest income280,361
 350,361
 394,901
Other-than-temporary impairments:
 
  
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses(14,312) (470) (789)
Other income (loss):     
Gain (loss) on investment securities280,118
 (341,312) (34,695)
Servicing income501,612
 343,096
 209,065
Loss on servicing asset(697,659) (69,033) (91,033)
(Loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements(108,289) 16,043
 (9,753)
Gain (loss) on other derivative instruments259,998
 (54,857) (70,159)
Other income337
 3,037
 30,141
Total other income (loss)236,117
 (103,026) 33,566
Expenses:     
Management fees60,102
 30,272
 40,472
Servicing expenses74,607
 61,136
 35,289
Other operating expenses57,055
 62,983
 54,160
Acquisition transaction costs
 86,703
 
Restructuring charges
 8,238
 
Total expenses191,764
 249,332
 129,921
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes310,402
 (2,467) 297,757
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes(13,560) 41,823
 (10,482)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations323,962
 (44,290) 308,239
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 44,146
Net income (loss)323,962
 (44,290) 352,385
Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 3,814
Net income (loss) attributable to Two Harbors Investment Corp.323,962
 (44,290) 348,571
Dividends on preferred stock75,801
 65,395
 25,122
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$248,161
 $(109,685) $323,449
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

88
61


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME (LOSS), continued
(in thousands, except share data)
Year Ended
December 31,
202120202019
Interest income:
Available-for-sale securities$167,310 $515,685 $962,283 
Other1,287 9,365 32,407 
Total interest income168,597 525,050 994,690 
Interest expense:
Repurchase agreements25,774 233,069 654,280 
Revolving credit facilities22,425 12,261 19,354 
Term notes payable12,936 14,974 10,708 
Convertible senior notes28,038 19,197 19,067 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances— 1,747 10,920 
Total interest expense89,173 281,248 714,329 
Net interest income79,424 243,802 280,361 
Other-than-temporary impairments:
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses— — (14,312)
Other income (loss):
Gain (loss) on investment securities121,617 (999,859)280,118 
Servicing income468,406 443,351 501,612 
Loss on servicing asset(114,941)(935,697)(697,659)
Gain (loss) on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements42,091 (310,806)(108,289)
(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments(251,283)90,023 259,998 
Other (loss) income(3,845)1,422 337 
Total other income (loss)262,045 (1,711,566)236,117 
Expenses:
Management fees— 31,738 60,102 
Servicing expenses86,250 94,266 74,607 
Compensation and benefits35,041 37,723 33,229 
Other operating expenses28,759 28,626 23,826 
Restructuring charges— 5,706 — 
Total expenses150,050 198,059 191,764 
Income (loss) before income taxes191,419 (1,665,823)310,402 
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes4,192 (35,688)(13,560)
Net income (loss)187,227 (1,630,135)323,962 
Dividends on preferred stock58,458 75,802 75,801 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$128,769 $(1,705,937)$248,161 
Basic earnings (loss) per weighted average common share$0.43 $(6.24)$0.93 
Diluted earnings (loss) per weighted average common share$0.43 $(6.24)$0.93 
Weighted average number of shares of common stock:
Basic297,772,001 273,600,947 267,826,739 
Diluted298,043,538 273,600,947 267,826,739 
 Year Ended
 December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Basic earnings (loss) per weighted average common share:     
Continuing operations$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.62
Discontinued operations
 
 0.23
Net income (loss)$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.85
Diluted earnings (loss) per weighted average common share:     
Continuing operations$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.60
Discontinued operations
 
 0.21
Net income (loss)$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.81
Weighted average number of shares of common stock:     
Basic267,826,739
 206,020,502
 174,433,999
Diluted267,826,739
 206,020,502
 188,133,341
Comprehensive income (loss):     
Net income (loss)$323,962
 $(44,290) $352,385
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities578,583
 (233,914) 135,586
Other comprehensive income (loss)578,583
 (233,914) 135,586
Comprehensive income (loss)902,545
 (278,204) 487,971
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 3,814
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Two Harbors Investment Corp.902,545
 (278,204) 484,157
Dividends on preferred stock75,801
 65,395
 25,122
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$826,744
 $(343,599) $459,035

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


8962



TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME, continued
(in thousands, except share data)
Year Ended
December 31,
202120202019
Comprehensive (loss) income:
Net income (loss)$187,227 $(1,630,135)$323,962 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities(455,255)(47,799)578,583 
Other comprehensive (loss) income(455,255)(47,799)578,583 
Comprehensive (loss) income(268,028)(1,677,934)902,545 
Dividends on preferred stock58,458 75,802 75,801 
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common stockholders$(326,486)$(1,753,736)$826,744 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

63

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands)
Preferred StockCommon Stock Par ValueAdditional Paid-in CapitalAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Cumulative EarningsCumulative Distributions to StockholdersTotal Stockholders’ Equity
Balance, December 31, 2018$977,501 $2,481 $4,809,616 $110,817 $2,332,371 $(3,978,297)$4,254,489 
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting principle— — — — (442)— (442)
Adjusted balance, January 1, 2019977,501 2,481 4,809,616 110,817 2,331,929 (3,978,297)4,254,047 
Net income— — — — 323,962 — 323,962 
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications, net of tax— — — 796,346 — — 796,346 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax— — — (217,763)— — (217,763)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax— — — 578,583 — — 578,583 
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs— 244 336,009 — — — 336,253 
Repurchase of common stock— — (19)— — — (19)
Preferred dividends declared— — — — — (75,801)(75,801)
Common dividends declared— — — — — (455,721)(455,721)
Non-cash equity award compensation— 9,158 — — — 9,162 
Balance, December 31, 2019$977,501 $2,729 $5,154,764 $689,400 $2,655,891 $(4,509,819)$4,970,466 
Net loss— — — — (1,630,135)— (1,630,135)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications, net of tax— — — 482,663 — — 482,663 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax— — — (530,462)— — (530,462)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — (47,799)— — (47,799)
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs— — 372 — — — 372 
Repurchase of common stock— (1)(1,063)— — — (1,064)
Preferred dividends declared— — — — — (75,802)(75,802)
Common dividends declared— — — — — (136,842)(136,842)
Non-cash equity award compensation— 9,721 — — — 9,730 
Balance, December 31, 2020$977,501 $2,737 $5,163,794 $641,601 $1,025,756 $(4,722,463)$3,088,926 
Net income— — — — 187,227 — 187,227 
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, net of tax— — — (319,694)— — (319,694)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax— — — (135,561)— — (135,561)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — (455,255)— — (455,255)
Redemption of preferred stock(274,951)— — — — — (274,951)
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs— 700 449,902 — — — 450,602 
Preferred dividends declared— — — — — (58,458)(58,458)
Common dividends declared— — — — — (205,623)(205,623)
Non-cash equity award compensation— 11,483 — — — 11,485 
Balance, December 31, 2021$702,550 $3,439 $5,625,179 $186,346 $1,212,983 $(4,986,544)$2,743,953 
 Preferred Stock Common Stock Par Value Additional Paid-in Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Cumulative Earnings Cumulative Distributions to Stockholders Total Stockholders’ Equity 
Non-
controlling Interest
 Total Equity
Balance, December 31, 2016$
 $1,739
 $3,661,711
 $199,227
 $2,038,033
 $(2,499,599) $3,401,111
 $
 $3,401,111
Net income
 
 
 
 348,571
 
 348,571
 3,814
 352,385
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications, net of tax expense of $45,157
 
 
 129,590
 
 
 129,590
 
 129,590
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax benefit of $2,722
 
 
 5,996
 
 
 5,996
 
 5,996
Other comprehensive income, net of tax expense of $42,435
 
 
 135,586
 
 
 135,586
 
 135,586
Contribution of TH Commercial Holdings LLC to Granite Point
 
 (13,771) 
 
 
 (13,771) 195,646
 181,875
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 
 182
 
 
 
 182
 (11,542) (11,360)
Issuance of preferred stock, net of offering costs702,537
 
 
 
 
 
 702,537
 
 702,537
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs
 
 449
 
 
 
 449
 
 449
Preferred dividends declared
 
 
 
 
 (25,122) (25,122) 
 (25,122)
Common dividends declared
 
 
 
 
 (350,709) (350,709) (3,177) (353,886)
Special dividend of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. common stock
 
 11,267
 
 
 (650,848) (639,581) (184,741) (824,322)
Non-cash equity award compensation
 6
 12,165
 
 
 
 12,171
 
 12,171
Balance, December 31, 2017702,537
 1,745
 3,672,003
 334,813
 2,386,604
 (3,526,278) 3,571,424
 
 3,571,424
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting principle
 
 25
 9,918
 (9,943) 
 
 
 
Adjusted balance, January 1, 2018702,537
 1,745
 3,672,028
 344,731
 2,376,661
 (3,526,278) 3,571,424
 
 3,571,424
Net loss
 
 
 
 (44,290) 
 (44,290) 
 (44,290)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, net of tax benefit of $14,890
 
 
 (488,253) 
 
 (488,253) 
 (488,253)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax benefit of $0
 
 
 254,339
 
 
 254,339
 
 254,339
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit of $14,890
 
 
 (233,914) 
 
 (233,914) 
 (233,914)
Acquisition of CYS Investments, Inc.274,950
 726
 1,124,388
 
 
 
 1,400,064
 
 1,400,064
Issuance of preferred stock, net of offering costs14
 
 
 
 
 
 14
 
 14
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs
 
 215
 
 
 
 215
 
 215
Preferred dividends declared
 
 
 
 
 (65,395) (65,395) 
 (65,395)
Common dividends declared
 
 
 
 
 (386,624) (386,624) 
 (386,624)
Non-cash equity award compensation
 10
 12,985
 
 
 
 12,995
 
 12,995
Balance, December 31, 2018977,501
 2,481
 4,809,616
 110,817
 2,332,371
 (3,978,297) 4,254,489
 
 4,254,489
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting principle
 
 
 
 (442) 
 (442) 
 (442)
Adjusted balance, January 1, 2019977,501
 2,481
 4,809,616
 110,817
 2,331,929
 (3,978,297) 4,254,047
 
 4,254,047
Net income
 
 
 
 323,962
 
 323,962
 
 323,962
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications, net of tax expense of $39
 
 
 796,346
 
 
 796,346
 
 796,346
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax benefit of $0
 
 
 (217,763) 
 
 (217,763) 
 (217,763)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax expense of $39
 
 
 578,583
 
 
 578,583
 
 578,583
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs
 244
 336,009
 
 
 
 336,253
 
 336,253
Repurchase of common stock
 
 (19) 
 
 
 (19) 
 (19)
Preferred dividends declared
 
 
 
 
 (75,801) (75,801) 
 (75,801)
Common dividends declared
 
 
 
 
 (455,721) (455,721) 
 (455,721)
Non-cash equity award compensation
 4
 9,158
 
 
 
 9,162
 
 9,162
Balance, December 31, 2019$977,501
 $2,729
 $5,154,764
 $689,400
 $2,655,891
 $(4,509,819) $4,970,466
 $
 $4,970,466

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

64
90




TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Year Ended
December 31,
202120202019
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)$187,227 $(1,630,135)$323,962 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment securities, net228,344 238,840 167,097 
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs on term notes payable and convertible senior notes2,999 2,336 1,680 
Other-than-temporary impairment losses— — 14,312 
Provision for credit losses on investment securities9,763 58,440 — 
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses on investment securities(131,380)941,419 (280,118)
Loss on servicing asset114,941 935,697 697,659 
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses on interest rate swaps, caps and swaptions(27,830)244,631 178,803 
Unrealized gains on other derivative instruments(5,217)(25,530)(34,745)
(Gains) losses on mortgage loans held-for-sale(1,812)(580)669 
Equity based compensation11,485 9,730 9,162 
Purchases of mortgage loans held-for-sale(64,008)— — 
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale65,772 9,001 16,806 
Proceeds from repayment of mortgage loans held-for-sale212 914 
Net change in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable20,908 45,460 (6,045)
Decrease (increase) in deferred income taxes, net5,960 (40,267)(24,912)
Decrease in accrued interest payable(3,284)(127,960)(10,379)
Change in other operating assets and liabilities, net9,634 (29,691)1,772 
Net cash provided by operating activities423,510 631,603 1,056,637 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities(2,494,603)(7,120,871)(24,656,050)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities6,274,193 18,349,338 15,879,823 
Principal payments on available-for-sale securities3,147,647 4,239,445 3,599,834 
Purchases of trading securities— (1,052,500)— 
Proceeds from sales of trading securities— 1,053,477 — 
Purchases of mortgage servicing rights, net of purchase price adjustments(742,153)(620,394)(611,765)
Proceeds from (payments for) sales of mortgage servicing rights31,787 (2,012)(1,898)
Short sales (purchases) of derivative instruments, net51,438 (29,286)(76,752)
Proceeds from sales and settlement (payments for termination and settlement) of derivative instruments, net40,012 (93,383)(749,226)
Payments for reverse repurchase agreements(1,174,883)(2,208,977)(2,056,825)
Proceeds from reverse repurchase agreements1,131,726 2,337,452 2,598,640 
Increase (decrease) in due to counterparties, net38,773 48,921 (35,100)
Change in other investing assets and liabilities, net10,000 2,508 31,575 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities$6,313,937 $14,903,718 $(6,077,744)
 Year Ended
 December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:     
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$323,962
 $(44,290) $308,239
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:       
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment securities, net167,097
 93,830
 67,651
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs on term notes payable and convertible senior notes1,680
 1,029
 714
Other-than-temporary impairment losses14,312
 470
 789
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses on investment securities(280,118) 344,468
 35,401
Loss on servicing asset697,659
 69,033
 91,033
Gain on residential mortgage loans held-for-investment and collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts
 
 (22,683)
Realized and unrealized losses on interest rate swaps, caps and swaptions178,803
 33,174
 930
Unrealized (gain) loss on other derivative instruments(34,745) 23,489
 50,099
Equity based compensation9,162
 12,995
 11,330
Excess consideration in the acquisition of CYS Investments, Inc.
 77,602
 
Net change in assets and liabilities:

    
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable(6,045) 12,366
 (24,689)
(Increase) decrease in deferred income taxes, net(24,912) 41,988
 (11,030)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable(10,379) 44,820
 67,118
Change in other operating assets and liabilities, net20,161
 (8,104) (229)
Net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations
 
 32,108
Net cash provided by operating activities1,056,637
 702,870
 606,781
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:     
Purchases of available-for-sale securities(24,656,050) (12,621,282) (18,232,105)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities15,879,823
 15,202,406
 8,708,941
Principal payments on available-for-sale securities3,599,834
 2,434,071
 1,553,051
Purchases of mortgage servicing rights, net of purchase price adjustments(611,765) (976,393) (484,261)
(Payments for) proceeds from sales of mortgage servicing rights(1,898) 637
 355
(Purchases) short sales of derivative instruments, net(76,752) (83,887) (103,175)
(Payments for termination and settlement) proceeds from sales and settlement of derivative instruments, net(749,226) 354,822
 85,811
Proceeds from sales of beneficial interests in securitization trusts
 
 190,160
Proceeds from repayment of residential mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts
 
 332,085
Payments for reverse repurchase agreements(2,056,825) (4,085,482) 
Proceeds from reverse repurchase agreements2,598,640
 4,085,127
 
Net cash paid for the acquisition of CYS Investments, Inc.
 (13,552) 
(Decrease) increase in due to counterparties, net(35,100) 449,274
 (805,158)
Change in other investing assets and liabilities, net31,575
 44,257
 83,976
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations
 
 (813,939)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities$(6,077,744) $4,789,998
 $(9,484,259)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

9165


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, continued
(in thousands)
Year Ended
December 31,
202120202019
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from repurchase agreements$29,934,379 $83,480,699 $236,071,952 
Principal payments on repurchase agreements(37,421,832)(97,484,264)(230,057,965)
Proceeds from revolving credit facilities296,500 152,000 450,000 
Principal payments on revolving credit facilities(159,569)(168,170)(460,000)
Proceeds from issuance of term notes payable— — 393,920 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible senior notes279,930 — — 
Repurchase of convertible senior notes(143,118)— — 
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances— 585,000 160,000 
Principal payments on Federal Home Loan Bank advances— (795,000)(815,024)
Redemption of preferred stock(274,951)— — 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs450,602 372 336,253 
Repurchase of common stock— (1,064)(19)
Dividends paid on preferred stock(63,661)(75,802)(75,801)
Dividends paid on common stock(193,488)(199,487)(463,147)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(7,295,208)(14,505,716)5,540,169 
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(557,761)1,029,605 519,062 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period2,646,431 1,616,826 1,097,764 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$2,088,670 $2,646,431 $1,616,826 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest$81,248 $404,261 $720,213 
Cash (received) paid for taxes, net$(23,322)$9,574 $28,202 
Noncash Activities:
Cumulative-effect adjustment to equity for adoption of new accounting principle$— $— $442 
Dividends declared but not paid at end of period$72,412 $65,480 $128,125 
 Year Ended
 December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:     
Proceeds from repurchase agreements$236,071,952
 $151,887,922
 $139,559,059
Principal payments on repurchase agreements(230,057,965) (156,949,180) (128,973,036)
Principal payments on collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts
 
 (328,978)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances160,000
 
 
Principal payments on Federal Home Loan Bank advances(815,024) (350,000) (2,784,976)
Proceeds from revolving credit facilities450,000
 397,400
 123,000
Principal payments on revolving credit facilities(460,000) (107,400) (173,000)
Proceeds from issuance of term notes payable393,920
 
 
Proceeds from convertible senior notes
 
 282,113
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of offering costs
 (36) 702,537
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs336,253
 215
 449
Repurchase of common stock(19) 
 
Dividends paid on preferred stock(75,801) (58,394) (13,173)
Dividends paid on common stock(463,147) (270,626) (422,885)
Net cash provided by financing activities from discontinued operations
 
 1,146,168
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities5,540,169
 (5,450,099) 9,117,278
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash519,062
 42,769
 239,800
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of continuing operations at beginning of period1,097,764
 1,054,995
 758,916
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of discontinued operations at beginning of period
 
 56,279
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period1,097,764
 1,054,995
 815,195
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$1,616,826
 $1,097,764
 $1,054,995

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

92
66


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, continued
(in thousands)
 Year Ended
 December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:   
Cash paid for interest$720,213
 $419,878
 $227,518
Cash paid (received) for taxes, net$28,202
 $397
 $(856)
Noncash Activities:     
Acquisition of the assets and liabilities of CYS Investments, Inc.     
Available-for-sale securities$
 $10,034,557
 $
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $386
 $
Restricted cash$
 $1,062
 $
Accrued interest receivable$
 $30,646
 $
Reverse repurchase agreements$
 $761,460
 $
Other assets$
 $11,977
 $
Repurchase agreements$
 $(8,743,527) $
Derivative liabilities, net$
 $(451,026) $
Due to counterparties, net$
 $(279,715) $
Accrued interest payable$
 $(27,487) $
Other liabilities$
 $(821) $
Issuance of preferred stock in connection with the acquisition of CYS Investments, Inc.$
 $275,000
 $
Issuance of common stock in connection with the acquisition of CYS Investments, Inc.$
 $1,125,114
 $
Deconsolidation of the assets and liabilities of variable interest entities     
Residential mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts$
 $
 $2,894,507
Accrued interest receivable$
 $
 $15,386
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts$
 $
 $2,920,970
Accrued interest payable$
 $
 $8,271
Accrued expenses and other liabilities$
 $
 $10,826
Recognition of beneficial interests in securitization trusts$
 $
 $59,826
Distribution of TH Commercial Holdings LLC to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. in exchange for common shares$
 $
 $651,000
Distribution of Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. common stock$
 $
 $650,848
Cumulative-effect adjustment to equity for adoption of new accounting principle$442
 $9,918
 $
Dividends declared but not paid at end of period$128,125
 $135,551
 $12,552
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

93




TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Organization and Operations
Two Harbors Investment Corp., or the Company, is a Maryland corporation investingthat, through its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company), invests in and managingmanages Agency residential mortgage-backed securities, or Agency RMBS, non-Agency securities, mortgage servicing rights, or MSR, and other financial assets. The investment portfolio is managed as a whole is managed by the Company’s Co-Chief Investment Officers and resources are allocated and financial performance is assessed on a consolidated basis. The Company is externally managed and advised by PRCM Advisers LLC, or PRCM Advisers, which is a subsidiary of Pine River Capital Management L.P., or Pine River. The Company’s common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “TWO”.
The Company was incorporated on May 21, 2009, and commenced operations as a publicly traded company on October 28, 2009, upon completion of a merger with Capitol Acquisition Corp., or Capitol, which became a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of the Company as a result of the merger.
The Company has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, as defined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As long as the Company continues to comply with a number of requirements under federal tax law and maintains its qualification as a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes to the extent that the Company distributes its taxable income to its stockholders on an annual basis and does not engage in prohibited transactions. However, certain activities that the Company may perform may cause it to earn income which will not be qualifying income for REIT purposes. The Company has designated certain of its subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, as defined in the Code, to engage in such activities.
On April 26, 2018,In the first quarter of 2020, the Company announcedexperienced unprecedented market conditions as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic, including unusually significant spread widening in both Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities. In response, the Company focused its efforts on raising excess liquidity and de-risking its portfolio. On March 25, 2020, the Company sold substantially all of its non-Agency securities in order to eliminate the risks posed by continued margin calls and ongoing funding concerns associated with the significant spread widening on these assets. The Company also sold approximately one-third of its Agency RMBS in order to reduce risk and raise cash to establish a strong defensive liquidity position to weather potential ongoing economic and market instability. Late in the first quarter of 2020, the U.S. Federal Reserve, or the Fed, committed to unlimited purchases of Agency RMBS. The Fed’s actions were successful in helping to stabilize that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire CYS Investments, Inc., or CYS, a Maryland corporation that invested primarilymarket; however, the resulting historic spread tightening in the first half of 2021 made investments in Agency RMBS less attractive. As a result, and in anticipation of an accelerated tapering of Fed purchases, the Company reduced its aggregate Agency RMBS/TBA position during the year ended December 31, 2021. In the ordinary course of business, management makes investment decisions and allocates capital in accordance with its views on the changing risk/reward dynamics in the market and in the Company’s portfolio. Going forward, management expects the Company’s capital to be fully allocated to its strategy of pairing Agency RMBS and MSR.
Through August 14, 2020, the Company was treated asexternally managed and advised by PRCM Advisers LLC, a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The transaction was approved bysubsidiary of Pine River Capital Management L.P., under the stockholdersterms of botha Management Agreement between the Company and CYS on July 27, 2018,PRCM Advisers. The Company terminated the Management Agreement effective August 14, 2020 for “cause” in accordance with Section 15(a) thereof. On August 15, 2020, the Company completed its transition to self-management and directly hired the merger was completed on July 31, 2018, at which time CYS became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In exchange for all of the shares of CYS common stock outstanding immediately priorsenior management team and other personnel who had historically provided services to the effective time of the merger, the Company issued approximately 72.6 million new shares of common stock, as well as aggregate cash consideration of $15.0 million, to CYS common stockholders. In addition, the Company issued 3 million shares of newly classified Series D cumulative redeemable preferred stock and 8 million shares of newly classified Series E cumulative redeemable preferred stock in exchange for all shares of CYS’s Series A and Series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock outstanding prior to the effective time of the merger.Company.

Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries; inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated. The accounting and reporting policies ofAll trust entities in which the Company conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. All per share amounts, common shares outstanding and restricted shares for all prior periods presented have been adjusted on a retroactive basis to reflect the Company’s one-for-two reverse stock split effected on November 1, 2017 (refer to Note 17 - Stockholders’ Equity for additional information).
Due to its controlling ownership interest in Granite Point through November 1, 2017, the Company consolidated Granite Point on its financial statements. Effective November 1, 2017 (the date the 33.1 million shares of Granite Point common stock were distributed to the Company’s common stockholders), the Company no longer had a controlling interest in Granite Point and, therefore, deconsolidated Granite Point and its subsidiaries from its financial statements and reclassified all of Granite Point’s prior period assets, liabilities and results of operations to discontinued operations.

94


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company retains debt securities and excess servicing rights purchased from securitization trusts sponsored by either third parties or the Company’s subsidiaries. The securitization trustsholds investments that are considered variable interest entities, or VIEs, for financial reporting purposes and, thus, arewere reviewed for consolidation under the applicable consolidation guidance. Whenever the Company has both the power to direct the activities of a trust that most significantly impact the entities’ performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the entities that could be significant, the Company consolidates the trust. During the majorityThe accounting and reporting policies of 2017, the Company retainedconform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the most subordinate security in each of the securitization trusts, which gave the Company the power to direct the activities of the trusts that most significantly impact the trusts’ performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the securitization trusts that could be significant. As a result, the Company consolidated all of the securitization trusts, including the underlying mortgage loans held by the trusts (residential mortgage loans held-for-investment) and the associated debt (collateralized borrowings), on its consolidated balance sheet. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company sold all of the retained subordinated securities thereby removing the Company’s power to direct the activities of the trusts and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the securitization trusts. As a result, the securitization trusts are no longer consolidated on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and the remaining retained securities are included within non-Agency available-for-sale, or AFS, securities.current period presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make a number of significant estimates. These include estimates of fair value of certain assets and liabilities, amount and timing of credit losses, prepayment rates, the period of time during which the Company anticipates an increase in the fair values of real estate securities sufficient to recover unrealized losses in those securities, and other estimates that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reported period. It is likely that changes in these estimates (e.g., valuation changes due to supply and demand in the market, credit performance, prepayments, interest rates, or other reasons) will occur in the near term. The Company’s estimates are inherently subjective in nature and actual results could differ from its estimates and the differences may be material.
67

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Significant Accounting Policies
Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities
During the second quarter ofyear ended December 31, 2019, the Company formed a new trust entity, or the MSR Issuer Trust, for the purpose of financing MSR through securitization. On June 27, 2019, the Company, through the MSR Issuer Trust, completed an MSR securitization transaction pursuant to which, through two of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, MSR is pledged to the MSR Issuer Trust and in return, the MSR Issuer Trust issued (a) an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million in term notes to qualified institutional buyers and (b) a variable funding note, or VFN, with a maximum principal balance of $1.0 billion to one of the subsidiaries, in each case secured on a pari passu basis. The term notes bear interest at a rate equal to one-month LIBOR plus 2.80% per annum. The term notes will mature on June 25, 2024 or, if extended pursuant to the terms of the related indenture supplement, June 25, 2026 (unless earlier redeemed in accordance with their terms).
TheDuring the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company formed a trust entity, or the Servicing Advance Receivables Issuer Trust, isfor the purpose of financing servicing advances through a revolving credit facility, pursuant to which the Servicing Advance Receivables Issuer Trust issued a VFN backed by servicing advances pledged to the financing counterparty.
Both the MSR Issuer Trust and the Servicing Advance Receivables Issuer Trust are considered a VIEVIEs for financial reporting purposes and, thus, waswere reviewed for consolidation under the applicable consolidation guidance. As the Company has both the power to direct the activities of the Issuer Trusttrusts that most significantly impact the entity’sentities’ performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the entityentities that could be significant, the Company consolidates the trust.trusts.
Available-for-Sale Securities, at Fair Value
The Company invests primarily in mortgage pass-through certificates, collateralized mortgage obligations and other residential mortgage-backed securities representing interests in or obligations backed by pools of mortgage loans issued by a U.S. government sponsored enterprise, or GSE, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association or(or Fannie Mae,Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (or Freddie Mac), or Freddie Mac, anda U.S. government agency such as the Government National Mortgage Association or(or Ginnie Mae, or collectively, the government sponsored entities, or GSEsMae) (collectively “Agency RMBS”). The Company also invests inholds securities that are not issued by the GSEs,a GSE or U.S government agency, or non-Agency securities, and, from time to time, U.S. Treasuries.
The Company classifies its Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities, excluding inverse interest-only Agency securities which are classified as derivatives for purposes of U.S. GAAP, as available-for-sale, or AFS, investments. Although the Company generally intends to hold most of its investment securities until maturity, it may, from time to time, sell any of its investment securities as part of its overall management of its portfolio. Accordingly, the Company classifies all of its securities as AFS, including its interest-only strips, which represent the Company’s right to receive a specified portion of the contractual interest flows of specific Agency or non-Agency securities. All assets classified as AFS, excluding certain Agency interest-only mortgage-backed securities, are reported at estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses excluding other-than-temporary impairments, included in accumulated other comprehensive income, on an after-tax basis.

95


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

On July 1, 2015, the Company elected the fair value option for Agency interest-only securities acquired on or after such date. On July 1, 2021, the Company elected the fair value option for non-Agency interest-only securities acquired on or after such date. All Agency interest-only securities acquired on or after July 1, 2015 and all non-Agency interest-only securities acquired on or after July 1, 2021 are carried at estimated fair value with changes in fair value excluding other-than-temporary impairments, recorded as a component of gain (loss) on investment securities in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). income.
Fair value is determined under the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820. The Company determines the fair value of its RMBS that are issued or guaranteed as to principal and/or interest by a GSE or U.S. government agency, based upon prices obtained from third-party pricing vendors or broker quotes received using the bid price, which are both deemed indicative of market activity. In determining the fair value of its non-Agency securities, management judgment is used to arrive at fair value that considers prices obtained from third-party pricing vendors, broker quotes received and other applicable market data. If listed price data is not available or insufficient, then fair value is based upon internally developed models that are primarily based on observable market-based inputs but also include unobservable market data inputs. See Note 10 - Fair Value of these notes to the consolidated financial statements for details on fair value measurement.
Investment securities transactions are recorded on the trade date. The cost basis for realized gains and losses on sales of investment securities are determined on the first-in, first-out, or FIFO, method.
68

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Interest income (i.e., gross yield/stated coupon) on securities is accrued based on the outstanding principal balance and their contractual terms. Premiums and discounts associated with Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities rated AA and higher at the time of purchase, are amortized intoand accreted, respectively, as an adjustment to interest income over the life of such securities using the contractual method under ASC 310-20, Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs, which is applied at the individual security level based upon each security’s effective yield method. Adjustments to premium amortization are made for actual prepayment activity.interest rate. The Company estimatescalculates each security’s effective interest rate at the time of purchase by solving for the discount rate that equates the present value of that security's remaining contractual cash flows, assuming no principal prepayments, forto its Agency interest-only securities, which representpurchase price. When applying the Company’s right to receive a specified portioncontractual effective interest method, as principal prepayments occur, an amount of the unamortized premium or discount is recognized in interest income such that the contractual effective interest flows of specific Agency securities. As a result, if prepayments increase (or are expected to increase), the Company will accelerate the rate of amortization on the premiums.remaining security balance is unaffected.
Interest income on theDiscounts associated with non-Agency securities that were purchased at a discount to par value and were rated below AA at the time of purchase and Agency and non-Agency interest-only securities that can be contractually prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that the Company would not recover substantially all of its recorded investment are accreted as an adjustment to interest income over the life of such securities using the prospective method under ASC 325-40, Investments - Other: Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, which is recognizedapplied at the individual security level based onupon each security’s effective interest rate. At the time of acquisition, the security’s effective interest rate. The effective interest rate on these securities is based oncalculated by solving for the projectedsingle discount rate that equates the present value of the Company’s best estimate of the amount and timing of the cash flows expected to be collected from eachthe security which are estimated based on the Company’s observation of current information and events and include assumptions related to interest rates, prepayment rates, and the timing and amount of credit losses.its purchase price. On at least a quarterly basis, the Company reviews and, if appropriate, makes adjustments to its cash flow projections based on input and analysis received from external sources, internal models, and its judgment about interest rates, prepayment rates, the timing and amount of credit losses, and other factors. Changes in cash flows from those originally projected, or from those estimated at the last evaluation, may result in a prospective change in the yield/effective interest rate and interest income recognized on such securities.
Actual maturities of the AFS securities are affected by the contractual lives of the associated mortgage collateral, periodic payments of principal, and prepayments of principal. Therefore actual maturities of AFS securities are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities. Stated contractual maturities are generally greater than ten years.
BasedFollowing the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, on January 1, 2020 (refer to “Recently Issued and/or Adopted Accounting Standards” below for additional information about the standard and the Company’s adoption), the Company uses a discounted cash flow method to estimate and recognize an allowance for credit losses on both Agency and non-Agency AFS securities that are not accounted for under the fair value option. The initial estimated allowance for credit losses was equal to the difference between the prepayment adjusted contractual cash flows with no credit losses and the prepayment adjusted expected cash flows with credit losses, discounted at the effective interest rate on the projectedAFS security that was in effect upon adoption of the standard. The contractual cash flows fromand expected cash flows are based on management’s best estimate and take into consideration current prepayment assumptions, lifetime expected losses based on past loss experience, current market conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future conditions. The allowance for credit losses on Agency AFS securities relates to prepayment assumption changes on interest-only Agency RMBS. The initial allowance for credit losses caused an increase in the Company’s non-Agency securities purchased atAFS security amortized cost and recognized an allowance for credit losses in the same amount. Subsequent adverse or favorable changes in the allowance for credit losses are recognized immediately in earnings as a discountprovision for or reduction in credit losses (within gain (loss) on investment securities). Adverse changes are reflected as an increase to parthe allowance for credit losses and favorable changes are reflected as a decrease to the allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is limited to the difference between the beneficial interest’s fair value and its amortized cost, and any remaining adverse changes in these circumstances are reflected as a prospective adjustment to accretable yield. If the allowance for credit losses has been reduced to zero, the remaining favorable changes are reflected as a prospective adjustment to accretable yield. The Company does not adjust the effective interest rate in subsequent periods for prepayment assumption changes or variable-rate changes. Any changes in the allowance for credit losses due to the time-value-of-money are accounted for in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income as provision for credit losses rather than a reduction to interest income. Any portion of the purchase discount may be designated as credit protection against future credit losses and, therefore, not accreted into interest income. The amount designated as credit discount may be adjusted over time, based on the actual performanceAFS securities that is deemed uncollectible results in a write-off of the security, its underlying collateral, actual and projected cash flow from such collateral, economic conditions, and other factors. If the performance of a securityuncollectible amortized cost with a corresponding reduction to the allowance for credit discount is more favorable than forecasted, a portionlosses. Recoveries of amounts previously written off results in an increase to the amount designated asallowance for credit discount may be accreted into interest income prospectively. Conversely, if the performance of a security with a credit discount is less favorable than forecasted, an impairment charge and write-down of such security to a new cost basis results.

losses.
96
69

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company evaluates its investment securities, on a quarterly basis, to assess whether a decline in the fair value of an AFS security below the Company’s amortized cost basis is an other-than-temporary impairment, or OTTI. The presence of OTTI is based upon a fair value decline below a security’s amortized cost basis and a corresponding adverse change in expected cash flows due to credit related factors as well as non-credit factors, such as changes in interest rates and market spreads. Impairment is considered other-than-temporary if an entity (i) intends to sell the security, (ii) will more likely than not be required to sell the security before it recovers in value, or (iii) does not expect to recover the security’s amortized cost basis, even if the entity does not intend to sell the security. Under these scenarios, the impairment is other-than-temporary and the full amount of impairment should be recognized currently in earnings and the cost basis of the investment security is adjusted. However, if an entity does not intend to sell the impaired debt security and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell before recovery, the OTTI is separated into (i) the estimated amount relating to credit loss, or credit component, and (ii) the amount relating to all other factors, or non-credit component. Only the estimated credit loss amount is recognized currently in earnings, with the remainder of the loss amount recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). The difference between the new amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income in accordance with the effective interest method.
Mortgage Servicing Rights, at Fair Value
The Company’s MSR represent the right to service mortgage loans. The Company and its subsidiaries do not originate or directly service mortgage loans, and instead contract with appropriately licensed subservicers to handle substantially all servicing functions in the name of the subservicer for the loans underlying the Company’s MSR. However, as an owner and manager of MSR, the Company may be obligated to fund advances of principal and interest payments due to third-party owners of the loans, but not yet received from the individual borrowers. These advances are reported as servicing advances within the other assets line item on the consolidated balance sheets.
MSR are reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Although MSR transactions are observable in the marketplace, the valuation includes unobservable market data inputs (prepayment speeds,speeds; delinquency levels, discount rateslevels; option-adjusted spread, or OAS, which represents the incremental spread added to the risk-free rate to reflect the effects of any embedded options and other risk inherent in MSR; and cost to service). Changes in the fair value of MSR as well as servicing fee income and servicing expenses are reported on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). income.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in bank accounts and cash held in money market funds on an overnight basis.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents cash balances the Company is required to maintain with counterparties for securities and derivatives trading activity, servicing activities and collateral for the Company’s cash held by counterparties as collateral against the Company’s securities, certain derivative instruments and/or repurchase agreements.borrowings. Also included is the cash balance held pursuant to a letter of credit on the New York office lease. Cash held bybalances required to be maintained with counterparties as collateral, which resides in non-interest bearing accounts, isare not available to the Company for general corporate purposes, but may be applied against amounts due to security, derivative, servicing or repurchasefinancing counterparties or returned to the Company when the collateral requirements are exceeded, or at the maturity of the derivative or repurchase agreement.financing arrangement.
Accrued Interest Receivable
Accrued interest receivable represents interest that is due and payable to the Company. Cash interest is generally received within 30 days of recording the receivable.
Due from/to Counterparties, net
Due from counterparties includes cash held by counterparties for payment of principal and interest as well as cash held by counterparties asfor securities and derivatives trading activity, servicing activities and collateral against certain offor the Company’s derivatives and/or repurchase agreementsborrowings but represents excess capacity and deemed unrestricted and a receivable from the counterparty as of the balance sheet date. Due from counterparties also includes cash receivable from counterparties for sales of MSR pending final transfer and settlement. Due to counterparties includes cash payable by the Company upon settlement of trade positions as well as cash deposited to and held by the Company asfor securities and derivatives trading activity, servicing activities and collateral against certain offor the Company’s derivatives and/or repurchase agreementsborrowings but represents a payable to the counterparty as of the balance sheet date. Due to counterparties also includes purchase price holdbacks on MSR acquisitions for early prepayment or default provisions, collateral exceptions and other contractual terms.
Derivative Financial Instruments, at Fair Value
In accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging as amended and interpreted,, or ASC 815, all derivative financial instruments, whether designated for hedging relationships or not, are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as assets or liabilities and carried at fair value.

97


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

At the inception of a derivative contract, the Company determines whether the instrument will be part of a qualifying hedge accounting relationship or whether the Company will account for the contract as a trading instrument. Due to the volatility of the credit markets and difficulty in effectively matching pricing or cash flows, the Company has elected to treat all current derivative contracts as trading instruments. Changes in fair value as well as the accrual and settlement of interest associated with derivatives accounted for as trading instruments are reported in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income (loss) as gain (loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements or (loss) gain (loss) on other derivative instruments depending on the type of derivative instrument.
70

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company enters into interest rate derivative contracts for a variety of reasons, including minimizing fluctuations in earnings or market values on certain assets or liabilities that may be caused by changes in interest rates. The Company may, at times, enter into various forward contracts including short securities, Agency to-be-announced securities, or TBAs, options, futures, swaps, and caps. Due to the nature of these instruments, they may be in a receivable/asset position or a payable/liability position at the end of an accounting period. Amounts payable to and receivable from the same party under contracts may be offset as long as the following conditions are met: (a) each of the two parties owes the other determinable amounts; (b) the reporting party has the right to offset the amount owed with the amount owed by the other party; (c) the reporting party intends to offset; and (d) the right of offset is enforceable by law. If the aforementioned conditions are not met, amounts payable to and receivable from are presented by the Company on a gross basis in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s centrally cleared interest rate swaps require that the Company posts an “initial margin” amount determined by the clearing exchange, which is generally intended to be set at a level sufficient to protect the exchange from the interest rate swap’s maximum estimated single-day price movement. The Company also exchanges “variation margin” based upon daily changes in fair value, as measured by the exchange. As a result of amendments to rules governing certain central clearing activities, theThe exchange of variation margin is considered a settlement of the interest rate swap, as opposed to pledged collateral. Accordingly, beginning in the first quarter of 2018 and in subsequent periods, the Company accounts for the receipt or payment of variation margin on interest rate swaps as a direct reduction to the carrying value of the interest rate swap asset or liability. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, variationVariation margin pledged or received is netted on a counterparty basis and classified within restricted cash, due from counterparties, or due to counterparties on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
The Company has provided specific disclosure regarding the location and amounts of derivative instruments in the consolidated financial statements and how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for. See Note 7 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities of these notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Reverse Repurchase Agreements
The Company may borrow U.S. Treasury securities through reverse repurchase transactions under its master repurchase agreements to cover short sales. The Company accounts for these reverse repurchase agreements as securities borrowing transactions and records them at their contractual amounts, as specified in the respective agreements.
Commercial Real Estate Assets (of Discontinued Operations)
Due to the Company’s controlling ownership interest in Granite Point through November 1, 2017, its financial condition and results of operations through such date reflect Granite Point’s commercial strategy, which includes as target assets first mortgages, mezzanine loans, B-notes and preferred equity. These commercial real estate assets have been reclassified to assets of discontinued operations on the consolidated balance sheets. Interest income on commercial real estate assets has been reclassified to income from discontinued operations on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
The Company’s commercial real estate assets were reported at cost, net of any unamortized acquisition premiums or discounts, loan fees and origination costs as applicable, unless the assets were deemed impaired. No impairments were recorded while these loans were held by the Company.
Interest income on commercial real estate assets was recognized at the loan coupon rate. Any premiums or discounts, loan fees and origination costs were amortized or accreted into interest income over the lives of the loans using the effective interest method. Loans were considered past due when they are 30 days past their contractual due date. Interest income recognition was suspended when loans are placed on nonaccrual status. Generally, commercial real estate loans were placed on nonaccrual status when delinquent for more than 60 days or when determined not to be probable of full collection. Interest accrued, but not collected, at the date loans were placed on nonaccrual is reversed and subsequently recognized only to the extent it was received in cash or until it qualified for return to accrual status. However, where there was doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of loan principal, all cash received was applied to reduce the carrying value of such loans. Commercial real estate loans were restored to accrual status only when contractually current or the collection of future payments was reasonably assured.

98


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Repurchase Agreements
The Company financesmay finance certain of its investment securities and MSR through the use of repurchase agreements. These repurchase agreements are generally short-term debt, which expire within one year. As of December 31, 2019,At times, certain of the Company’s repurchase agreements hadmay have contractual terms of greater than one year, and, werethus, would be considered long-term debt. Borrowings under repurchase agreements generally bear interest rates ofbased on an index plus a specified margin over one-month LIBORspread and are generally uncommitted. The repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at their contractual amounts, as specified in the respective agreements.
Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines Advances and Stock Holdings
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, TH Insurance Holdings Company LLC, or TH Insurance, is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, or the FHLB. As a member of the FHLB, TH Insurance has access to a variety of products and services offered by the FHLB, including secured advances.
The Company’s secured advances from the FHLB may have both short-term and long-term maturities. The advances with less than five-year terms generally bear interest rates of a spread over one- or three-month LIBOR and the advances with 20-year terms generally bear interest rates of or one- or three-month MOVR, or the FHLB member option variable-rate. FHLB advances are treated as secured financing transactions and are carried at their contractual amounts.
As a condition to membership in the FHLB, the Company is required to purchase and hold a certain amount of FHLB stock, which is based, in part, upon the outstanding principal balance of advances from the FHLB. FHLB stock is considered a nonmarketable, long-term investment, is carried at cost and is subject to recoverability testing under applicable accounting standards. This stock can only be redeemed or sold at its par value, and only to the FHLB. Accordingly, when evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, the Company considers the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than recognizing temporary declines in value. At its discretion, the FHLB may declare dividends on its stock.
Revolving Credit Facilities
To finance MSR assets and related servicing advance obligations, the Company enters into revolving credit facilities collateralized by pledged MSR.the value of the MSR and/or servicing advances pledged. Borrowings under these revolving credit facilities that expire within one year are considered short-term debt. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company’s revolving credit facilities that had contractual terms of greater than one year were considered long-term debt. The Company’s revolving credit facilities generally bear interest rates ofbased on an index plus a specified margin over one-month LIBOR.spread. Borrowings under revolving credit facilities are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at contractual amounts, as specified in the respective agreements.
Term Notes Payable
Term notes payable related to the Company’s consolidated securitization are recorded at outstanding principal balance, net of any unamortized deferred debt issuance costs, on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Convertible Senior Notes
Convertible senior notes include unsecured convertible debt that are carried at their unpaid principal balance, net of any unamortized deferred issuance costs, on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Interest on the notes is payable semiannually until such time the notes mature or are converted into shares of the Company’s common stock.
Accrued Interest Payable
Accrued interest payable represents interest that is due and payable to third parties. Interest is generally paid within 30 days to three months of recording the payable, based upon the Company’s remittance requirements.
71

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Income recognition for U.S. GAAP and tax differ in certain respects. These differences often reflect differing accounting treatments for tax and U.S. GAAP, such as accounting for discount and premium amortization, credit losses, asset impairments, recognition of certain operating expenses and certain valuation estimates. Some of these differences are temporary in nature and create timing mismatches between when taxable income is earned and the tax is paid versus when the earnings (losses) for U.S. GAAP purposes, or GAAP net income (loss), are recognized and the tax provision is recorded. Some of these differences are permanent since certain income (or expense) may be recorded for tax purposes but not for U.S. GAAP purposes (or vice-versa). One such significant permanent difference is the Company’s ability as a REIT to deduct dividends paid to stockholders as an expense for tax purposes, but not for U.S. GAAP purposes.
As a result of these temporary differences, the Company’s TRSs may recognize taxable income in periods prior or subsequent to when it recognizes income for U.S. GAAP purposes. When this occurs, the TRSs pay or defer the tax liability and establish deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities, respectively, for U.S. GAAP purposes.

99


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

As the income is subsequently realizedDeferred tax assets generally represent items that may be used as a tax deduction in a tax return in future periods underyears for which the Company has already recognized the tax benefit for U.S. GAAP purposes. The Company estimates, based on existence of sufficient evidence, the ability to realize the remainder of any deferred tax asset its TRSs recognize. Any adjustments to such estimates will be made in the period such determination is made. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense for which payment has been deferred or expense has already been taken as a deduction on the Company’s tax return but has not yet been recognized as an expense. Alternatively, as the TRSs realize the deferred taxable income, the deferred tax liability is recognized as a reduction to taxable income.expense for U.S. GAAP purposes. The Company’s deferred tax assets and/or liabilities are generated solely by differences in GAAP net income (loss) and taxable income (loss) at our taxable subsidiaries. U.S. GAAP and tax differences in the REIT may create additional deferred tax assets and/or liabilities to the extent the Company does not distribute all of its taxable income.
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code and the corresponding provisions of state law. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to stockholders (not including taxable income retained in its taxable subsidiaries) within the time frame set forth in the tax Code and the Company must also meet certain other requirements. In addition, because certain activities, if performed by the Company, may cause the Company to earn income which is not qualifying for the REIT gross income tests, the Company has formed TRSs, as defined in the Code, to engage in such activities. These TRSs’ activities are subject to income taxes as well as any REIT taxable income not distributed to stockholders.
The Company assesses its tax positions for all open tax years and determines whether the Company has any material unrecognized liabilities in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, or ASC 740. The Company records these liabilities to the extent the Company deems them more likely than not to be incurred. The Company classifies interest and penalties on material uncertain tax positions as interest expense and operating expense, respectively, in its consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). income.
Tax effectsExpenses
Expenses on the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income typically consist of management fees, servicing expenses generally related to the subservicing of MSR, compensation and benefits and other operating expenses. Prior to the termination of the Tax CutsManagement Agreement on August 14, 2020, management fees were payable to PRCM Advisers under the agreement. The management fee was calculated based on the Company’s stockholders’ equity with certain adjustments outlined in the management agreement (see Note 21 - Related Party Transactions for further detail). Also prior to the termination of the Management Agreement, included in compensation and Jobs Actbenefits and other operating expenses were direct and allocated costs incurred by PRCM Advisers on the Company’s behalf and reimbursed by the Company. Included in these reimbursed costs was (a) the Company’s allocable share of 2017 (“TCJA”),the compensation paid by PRCM Advisers to its personnel serving as the Company’s principal financial officer and general counsel and personnel employed by PRCM Advisers as in-house legal, tax, accounting, consulting, auditing, administrative, information technology, valuation, computer programming and development and back-office resources to the Company, (b) any amounts for personnel of PRCM Advisers’ affiliates arising under a shared facilities and services agreement, and (c) certain costs allocated to the Company by PRCM Advisers for data services and technology. Subsequent to the transition to self-management, the Company no longer pays a management fee to, or reimburses the expenses of, PRCM Advisers. Expenses for which the Company previously reimbursed PRCM Advisers are now borne directly by the Company. The Company is also now responsible for the cash compensation and employee benefits of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer and investment professionals, which were previously the responsibility of PRCM Advisers. Prior to the termination of the Management Agreement, the Company was signed into law on December 22, 2017 significantly revisedonly responsible for the U.S. corporate income tax by, among other things, lowering the federal income tax rate applicable to corporations from 35% to 21% and repealing the corporate alternative minimum tax. In addition, the deduction of net interest expense is limited for all businesses; provided that certain businesses, including real estate businesses, may elect not to be subjectequity compensation paid to such limitations and insteadindividuals.
72

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to depreciate their real property related assets over longer depreciable lives. This limitation could adversely affect our TRSs.the Consolidated Financial Statements
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Current period net unrealized gains and losses on AFS securities, excluding Agency interest-only securities, are reported as components of accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). income. Net unrealized gains and losses on securities held by our taxable subsidiaries that are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income are adjusted for the effects of taxation and may create deferred tax assets or liabilities.
Earnings Per Share
BasicThe Company’s common stock, par value and shares issued and outstanding, includes issued and unvested shares of restricted common stock, which have full rights to the common stock dividend declarations of the Company. Common shares underlying certain other equity-based awards granted by the Company are not included in common stock until the awards vest. If these awards have non-forfeitable dividend participation rights, they are considered participating securities in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share.
Basic earnings (loss) per share areis computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, less income allocated to participating securities pursuant to the two-class method, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing basic net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period. For both basicperiod, further adjusted for the dilutive effect, if any, of share-based payment awards and diluted per share calculations, potential common shares represents issued and unvested shares of restricted stock, which have full rights to the common stock dividend declarations of the Company. If the assumed conversion of convertible notes into common shares is dilutive,shares.
Unvested equity-based awards are included in the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share under either the two-class method or the treasury stock method, depending upon which method produces the more dilutive result. The two-class method is adjustedan earnings allocation formula under which earnings (loss) per share is calculated for common stock and participating securities according to dividends declared and participating rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated between participating securities and common shares based on their respective rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. Under the treasury stock method, common equivalent shares are calculated assuming that any share-based payment awards vest according to their respective agreements and unrecognized compensation cost is used to repurchase shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock at the average market price during the reported period. Under the if-converted method, the assumed conversion of each convertible note into common shares is calculated by adding back the respective periodic interest expense (net of any tax effects) associated with dilutive convertible notes to net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders and adding the shares issued in an assumed conversion to the diluted weighted average share count. All per share amounts, common shares outstanding and restricted shares for all periods presented reflect the Company’s one-for-two reverse stock split effected on November 1, 2017 (refer to Note 17 - Stockholders’ Equity for additional information).
Equity Incentive PlanPlans
The Company’s Second Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2009 Plan, providesand the Company’s 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2021 Plan, or collectively, the Equity Incentive Plans, provide incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified directors, officers, advisors, consultantspersonnel and other personnel, including PRCM Advisers and its affiliates.parties who may provide significant services to the Company. The Plan isEquity Incentive Plans are administered by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors. The Plan permitsEquity Incentive Plans permit the grantinggrants of restricted shares of common stock, restricted stock units, or RSUs, performance-based awards (including performance share units, or PSUs), phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards. See Note 1817 - Equity Incentive PlanPlans for further details regarding the Plan.Equity Incentive Plans.
Equity-based compensation costs are initially measured at the estimated fair value of the awards on the grant date. Valuation methods used and subsequent expense recognition is dependent upon each award’s service and performance conditions. The cost ofCompany has elected not to estimate forfeitures when valuing equity-based awards and adjusts compensation awardedcosts as actual forfeitures occur. Compensation costs for equity-based awards subject only to employees provided by our manager isservice conditions are measured at the closing stock price on the grant date and fixedare recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods for the awards, adjusted for any forfeitures. Compensation costs for equity-based awards subject to market-based performance metrics are measured at the grant date basedusing Monte Carlo simulations which incorporate assumptions for stock return volatility, dividend yield and risk-free interest rates. These initial valuation amounts are recognized as expense over the requisite performance periods, subject to adjustments only for actual forfeitures. Amortization of equity-based awards (non-cash equity compensation expense) is included within compensation and benefits on the priceconsolidated statements of the Company’s stock as of period end and amortized over the vesting term. Prior to the early adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, on July 1, 2018 (applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to cumulative earnings as of January 1, 2018, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures), the cost of equity-based compensation awarded to employees provided by our manager was measured at fair value at each reporting date based on the price of the Company’s stock as of period end and amortized over the vesting term.

comprehensive (loss) income.
100
73

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Asset Acquisition
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the acquirer in a merger transaction is to evaluate whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If that threshold is met, the set of acquired assets and associated activities is not deemed a business and is required to be accounted for as an asset acquisition. Upon completion of the merger with CYS on July 31, 2018, approximately 89% of the CYS assets acquired were Agency RMBS. The Company concluded that they were similar identifiable assets to be grouped to evaluate whether the “substantially all” threshold was met as the Agency RMBS are financial assets with similar risk characteristics associated with managing these assets. Given the concentration of the fair value of the Agency RMBS of the gross assets acquired, the Company concluded that the fair value of the gross assets acquired was concentrated in a group of similar identifiable assets and, therefore, the merger was accounted for as an asset acquisition. The financial results of CYS since the closing date of the acquisition have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Asset acquisitions are generally accounted for by allocating the cost of the acquisition plus direct transaction costs to the individual assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, and liabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis. This allocation may cause identified assets to be recognized at amounts that are greater than their fair values. However, “non-qualifying” assets, which include financial assets and other current assets, should not be assigned an amount greater than their fair value. The gross assets acquired in the merger consisted most significantly of financial assets and other current assets. The cost of the acquisition of CYS plus direct transaction costs exceeded gross assets acquired less liabilities assumed in the merger. As there were no meaningful nonfinancial assets and non-current assets in this transaction and no identified intangible assets to assign value, the excess consideration and transaction costs were recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) as an expense and an associated reduction in stockholders’ equity.
Recently Issued and/or Adopted Accounting Standards
Lease Classification and Accounting
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02, which requires lessees to recognize on their balance sheets both a lease liability for the obligation to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset for the right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The Company’s adoption of this ASU was applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to cumulative earnings as of January 1, 2019, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
On January 1, 2020, the Company will adoptadopted ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which changeschanged the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. Valuation allowancesAllowances for credit losses on AFS debt securities will beare recognized, rather than direct reductions in the amortized cost of the investments, regardless of whether the impairment is considered to be other-than-temporary. The new model also requires the estimation of lifetime expected credit losses and corresponding recognition of allowance for losses on trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans, and other instruments held at amortized cost. The ASU requires certain recurring disclosures.
The Company will useuses a discounted cash flow method to estimate and recognize an allowance for credit losses on AFS securities. The estimated allowance for credit losses will beis equal to the difference between the prepayment adjusted contractual cash flows with no credit losses and the prepayment adjusted expected cash flows with credit losses, discounted at the effective interest rate on the AFS security that iswas in effect upon adoption of the standard. The contractual cash flows and expected cash flows will beare based on management’s best estimate and take into consideration current prepayment assumptions, lifetime expected losses based on past loss experience, current market conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future conditions. The allowance for credit losses is expected tocauses an increase in the AFS security amortized cost and recognizerecognizes an allowance for credit losses in the same amount. AnyThe allowance for credit losses recognized in connection with adopting the guidance in Topic 326 that is different fromon January 1, 2020 was equal to the currentpresent value of the credit reserve will be recognized asin place on December 31, 2019. As a result, no cumulative effect adjustment to opening cumulative earnings. The Company has determined that the adoption will have no impact to cumulative earnings as of January 1, 2020.

101


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

was required.
The adoption of this ASU will impactimpacts the Company’s accounting for the purchase of certain beneficial interests with purchased credit deterioration or when there is a “significant” difference between contractual cash flows and expected cash flows. For these securities, the Company will recordrecords an allowance for credit losses with an increase in amortized cost above the purchase price of the same amount. Subsequent adverse or favorable changes in expected cash flows will beare recognized immediately in earnings as a provision for or reduction inreversal of provision for credit losses, respectively. Adverse changes will beare reflected as an increase to the allowance for credit losses and favorable changes will beare reflected as a decrease to the allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is limited to the difference between the beneficial interest’s fair value and its amortized cost, and any remaining adverse changes in these circumstances are reflected as a prospective adjustment to accretable yield. If the allowance for credit losses has been reduced to zero, the remaining favorable changes are reflected as a prospective adjustment to accretable yield. The Company willdoes not adjust the effective interest rate in subsequent periods for prepayment assumption changes and the Company will not adjust the effective interest rate in subsequent periods foror variable-rate changes. Any changes in the allowance for credit losses due to the time-value-of-money will beare accounted for in the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income statement as provision for credit loss expenselosses rather than a reduction to interest income. Any portion of the AFS securities that is deemed uncollectible results in a write-off of the uncollectible amortized cost with a corresponding reduction to the allowance for credit losses. Recoveries of amounts previously written off results in an increase to the allowance for credit losses.
The Company expects the standard to applyapplies to Agency and non-Agency securities that are accounted for as beneficial interests under ASCAccounting Standards Codification (ASC) 325-40, Investments-Other: Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, or ASC 325-40, and ASC 310-30, Receivables: Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, or ASC 310-30. Only beneficial interests that were previouspreviously accounted for as purchased credit impaired under ASC 310-30 will bewere accounted for as purchased credit deteriorated under Topic 326 on the transition date.
The Company has evaluated theUpon adoption of this ASU, to determine the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements, which at the date of adoption, will establishCompany established an allowance for credit losses on AFS securities accounted for as purchased credit-impaired assets under ASC 310-30 in an unrealized loss position and with no other-than-temporary impairments, or OTTI, recognized in periods prior to transition. The effective interest raterates on these debt securities will not be changed.remained unchanged. On January 1, 2020, the $30.7 billion net amortized cost basis of AFS securities will bewas inclusive of a $244.9 million allowance for credit loss. 
The Company will useused a prospective transition approach for debt securities for which OTTI had been recognized prior to January 1, 2020. As a result, the amortized cost basis remainsremained the same before and after the effective date. The effective interest rate on these debt securities will not be changed.also remained unchanged. Amounts previously recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income as of January 1, 2020 relating to improvements in cash flows expected to be collected will beare accreted into income over the remaining life of the asset. Recoveries of amounts previously written off relating to improvements in cash flows after January 1, 2020 will beare recorded in earnings when received.
74

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting
London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, has been used extensively in the U.S. and globally as a “benchmark” or “reference rate” for various commercial and financial contracts, including corporate and municipal bonds and loans, floating rate mortgages, asset-backed securities, consumer loans, and interest rate swaps and other derivatives. On March 5, 2021, Intercontinental Exchange Inc. announced that ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, the administrator of LIBOR, intends to stop publication of the majority of USD-LIBOR tenors on June 30, 2023. In the U.S., the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, or ARRC, has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, as its preferred alternative rate for U.S. dollar-based LIBOR. SOFR is a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities, and is based on directly observable U.S. Treasury-backed repurchase transactions. The ARRC has proposed a paced market transition plan to SOFR, and various organizations are currently working on industry wide and company-specific transition plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to LIBOR.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, which provides temporary optional expedients and exceptions on accounting for contract modifications and hedging relationships in anticipation of the replacement of the LIBOR with another reference rate. The guidance also provides a one-time election to sell held-to-maturity debt securities or to transfer such securities to the available-for-sale or trading category. The Company has developed new processes, policiesmaterial contracts that are indexed to USD-LIBOR and controlsis monitoring this activity, evaluating the related risks and the Company’s exposure, and has already amended terms to implementtransition to an alternative benchmark, where necessary. All of the standardCompany’s financing arrangements and performed testsderivative instruments that incorporate LIBOR as the referenced rate either mature prior to validate the internally developed cash flow models.phase out of LIBOR or have provisions in place that provide for an alternative to LIBOR upon its phase-out. Additionally, each series of the Company’s fixed-to-floating preferred stock that becomes callable at the time the stock begins to pay a LIBOR-based rate has existing LIBOR cessation fallback language. The processes, policies, controls and model validation were completed by the adoption date.
SEC Disclosure Update and Simplification
In August 2018, the SEC adopted a final rule that amends certain disclosure requirements that have become duplicative, overlapping, or outdated in light of other SEC disclosure requirements, U.S. GAAP, or changes in the information environment. However, the guidance also added requirements for entities to include in their interim financial statements a reconciliation of changes in stockholders’ equity for each period for which an income statement is required (both year-to-date and quarterly periods). The final rule isASU was effective immediately for all filings made on orentities and expires after November 5, 2018. However, the SEC staff said it would not object to a registrant waiting to comply with the new interim disclosure requirement until the filing of its Form 10-Q for the quarter that begins after the effective date. As a result, the Company adopted the new interim disclosure requirement in connection with the Form 10-Q filing for the first quarter 2019.December 31, 2022. The Company’s adoption of this final ruleASU did not have a materialan impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.

Issuer’s Accounting for Debt and Equity Instruments
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06 to simplify an issuer’s accounting for convertible instruments and its application of the derivatives scope exception for contracts in its own equity. Under the new guidance, only conversion features associated with a convertible debt instrument issued at a substantial premium and those that are considered embedded derivatives in accordance with derivatives guidance will be accounted for separate from the convertible instrument. Additionally, for contracts in an entity’s own equity, the new guidance eliminates some of the requirements for equity classification. The guidance also addresses how convertible instruments are accounted for in the diluted earnings per share calculation and requires enhanced disclosures about the terms of convertible instruments and contracts in an entity’s own equity. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning on or after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted. The early adoption of the ASU’s guidance results in the Company accounting for a convertible debt instrument without separately presenting in stockholders’ equity an embedded conversion feature. The Company accounts for a convertible debt instrument wholly as debt unless (a) a convertible instrument contains features that require bifurcation as a derivative under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815, or (b) a convertible debt instrument was issued at a substantial premium. The Company’s early adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.

Note 3. Variable Interest Entities
TheDuring the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company formed a trust entity, or the MSR Issuer Trust, that was formed for the purpose of financing MSR through securitization, (see discussionpursuant to which, through two of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, MSR is pledged to the MSR Issuer Trust and in Note 2 - Basisreturn, the MSR Issuer Trust issues term notes to qualified institutional buyers and a variable funding note, or VFN, to one of Presentationthe subsidiaries, in each case secured on a pari passu basis. In connection with the transaction, the Company also entered into a repurchase facility that is secured by the VFN issued in connection with the MSR securitization transaction, which is collateralized by the Company’s MSR.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company formed a trust entity, or the Servicing Advance Receivables Issuer Trust, for the purpose of financing servicing advances through a revolving credit facility, pursuant to which the Servicing Advance Receivables Issuer Trust issued a VFN backed by servicing advances pledged to the financing counterparty.
75

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Both the MSR Issuer Trust and Significant Accounting Policies) isthe Servicing Advance Receivables Issuer Trust are considered a VIEVIEs for financial reporting purposes and, thus, waswere reviewed for consolidation under the applicable consolidation guidance. As the Company has both the power to direct the activities of the Issuer Trusttrusts that most significantly impact the entity’sentities’ performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the entityentities that could be significant, the Company consolidates the trust.trusts. Additionally, in accordance with arrangements entered into in connection with the securitization transaction and the servicing advance revolving credit facility, the Company has direct financial obligations payable to both the MSR Issuer Trust and the Servicing Advance Receivables Issuer Trust, which, in turn, support the MSR Issuer Trust’s obligations to noteholders under the securitization transaction.

102


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notestransaction and the Servicing Advance Receivables Issuer Trust’s obligations to the Consolidated Financial Statements

financing counterparty.
The following table presents a summary of the assets and liabilities of all consolidated trusts as reported on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Note receivable (1)
$396,776 $395,609 
Restricted cash23,892 72,530 
Accrued interest receivable (1)
161 131 
Other assets33,767 28,540 
Total Assets$454,596 $496,810 
Term notes payable$396,776 $395,609 
Revolving credit facilities19,200 9,000 
Accrued interest payable216 156 
Other liabilities23,838 72,505 
Total Liabilities$440,030 $477,270 
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Note receivable (1)
$394,502
 $
Cash and cash equivalents200
 
Accrued interest receivable (1)
306
 
Total Assets$395,008
 $
Term notes payable$394,502
 $
Accrued interest payable306
 
Other liabilities200
 
Total Liabilities$395,008
 $
____________________
(1)Receivables due from a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to the trusts are eliminated in consolidation in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

____________________
(1)Receivables due from a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to the Issuer Trust are eliminated in consolidation in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Note 4. Available-for-Sale Securities, at Fair Value
The Company holds both Agency and non-Agency AFS investment securities which are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. The following table presents the Company’s AFS investment securities by collateral type as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Agency:
Federal National Mortgage Association$5,040,988 $11,486,658 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation1,922,809 2,837,103 
Government National Mortgage Association185,602 314,130 
Non-Agency12,304 13,031 
Total available-for-sale securities$7,161,703 $14,650,922 
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Agency   
Federal National Mortgage Association$21,252,575
 $15,812,696
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation6,070,500
 4,930,963
Government National Mortgage Association454,980
 941,374
Non-Agency3,628,273
 3,867,571
Total available-for-sale securities$31,406,328
 $25,552,604


At December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company pledged AFS securities with a carrying value of $29.8$7.0 billion and $25.2$14.6 billion, respectively, as collateral for repurchase agreements and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, or the FHLB.agreements. See Note 11 - Repurchase Agreementsand Note 12 - Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines Advances.
At December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company did not have any securities purchased from and financed with the same counterparty that did not meet the conditions of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)ASC 860,Transfers and Servicing, to be considered linked transactions and, therefore, classified as derivatives.
76

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company is not required to consolidate variable interest entities, or VIEs, for which it has concluded it does not have both the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the entities’ performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the entities that could be significant. The Company’s investments in these unconsolidated VIEs include all non-Agency securities, which are classified within available-for-sale securities, at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the carrying value, which also represents the maximum exposure to loss, of all non-Agency securities in unconsolidated VIEs was $3.6 billion$12.3 million and $3.9 billion,$13.0 million, respectively.

103


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The following tables present the amortized cost and carrying value of AFS securities by collateral type as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
December 31, 2021
(in thousands)Principal/ Current FaceUn-amortized PremiumAccretable Purchase DiscountAmortized CostAllowance for Credit LossesUnrealized GainUnrealized LossCarrying Value
Agency:
Principal and interest$6,411,363 $270,699 $(12)$6,682,050 $— $171,308 $(4,855)$6,848,503 
Interest-only3,198,447 305,577 — 305,577 (12,851)20,699 (12,529)300,896 
Total Agency9,609,810 576,276 (12)6,987,627 (12,851)192,007 (17,384)7,149,399 
Non-Agency1,940,815 16,533 (27)17,386 (1,387)33 (3,728)12,304 
Total$11,550,625 $592,809 $(39)$7,005,013 $(14,238)$192,040 $(21,112)$7,161,703 
December 31, 2020
(in thousands)(in thousands)Principal/ Current FaceUn-amortized PremiumAccretable Purchase DiscountAmortized CostAllowance for Credit LossesUnrealized GainUnrealized LossCarrying Value
Agency:Agency:
Principal and interestPrincipal and interest$13,103,355 $605,253 $(14)$13,708,594 $— $629,079 $(420)$14,337,253 
Interest-onlyInterest-only3,649,556 315,876 — 315,876 (17,889)15,680 (13,029)300,638 
Total AgencyTotal Agency16,752,911 921,129 (14)14,024,470 (17,889)644,759 (13,449)14,637,891 
December 31, 2019
(in thousands)Principal/ Current Face Un-amortized Premium Accretable Purchase Discount Credit Reserve Purchase Discount Amortized Cost Unrealized Gain Unrealized Loss Carrying Value
Agency               
Principal and interest$26,239,544
 $986,343
 $(19) $
 $27,225,868
 $424,818
 $(8,815) $27,641,871
Interest-only2,601,693
 169,811
 
 
 169,811
 13,724
 (47,351) 136,184
Total Agency28,841,237
 1,156,154
 (19) 
 27,395,679
 438,542
 (56,166) 27,778,055
Non-Agency               Non-Agency2,095,365 16,408 (36)18,705 (4,639)109 (1,144)13,031 
Principal and interest5,498,654
 8,980
 (560,140) (1,711,951) 3,235,543
 341,583
 (23,263) 3,553,863
Interest-only4,356,603
 79,935
 
 
 79,935
 3,039
 (8,564) 74,410
Total Non-Agency9,855,257
 88,915
 (560,140) (1,711,951) 3,315,478
 344,622
 (31,827) 3,628,273
Total$38,696,494
 $1,245,069
 $(560,159) $(1,711,951) $30,711,157
 $783,164
 $(87,993) $31,406,328
Total$18,848,276 $937,537 $(50)$14,043,175 $(22,528)$644,868 $(14,593)$14,650,922 

 December 31, 2018
(in thousands)Principal/ Current Face Un-amortized Premium Accretable Purchase Discount Credit Reserve Purchase Discount Amortized Cost Unrealized Gain Unrealized Loss Carrying Value
Agency               
Principal and interest$20,775,790
 $1,037,781
 $(25,085) $
 $21,788,486
 $61,128
 $(339,997) $21,509,617
Interest-only3,115,967
 209,901
 
 
 209,901
 14,170
 (48,655) 175,416
Total Agency23,891,757
 1,247,682
 (25,085) 
 21,998,387
 75,298
 (388,652) 21,685,033
Non-Agency               
Principal and interest5,360,124
 6,682
 (694,119) (1,322,762) 3,349,925
 478,095
 (44,657) 3,783,363
Interest-only5,137,169
 83,846
 
 
 83,846
 3,655
 (3,293) 84,208
Total Non-Agency10,497,293
 90,528
 (694,119) (1,322,762) 3,433,771
 481,750
 (47,950) 3,867,571
Total$34,389,050
 $1,338,210
 $(719,204) $(1,322,762) $25,432,158
 $557,048
 $(436,602) $25,552,604


The following tables present the carrying value of the Company’s AFS securities by rate type as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
 December 31, 2019
(in thousands) Agency  Non-Agency  Total
Adjustable Rate$14,584
 $3,344,287
 $3,358,871
Fixed Rate27,763,471
 283,986
 28,047,457
Total$27,778,055
 $3,628,273
 $31,406,328

104


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 December 31, 2018
(in thousands)Agency Non-Agency Total
Adjustable Rate$19,073
 $3,475,171
 $3,494,244
Fixed Rate21,665,960
 392,400
 22,058,360
Total$21,685,033
 $3,867,571
 $25,552,604


The following table presents the Company’s AFS securities according to their estimated weighted average life classifications as of December 31, 2019:2021:
December 31, 2021
(in thousands) Agency Non-Agency Total
< 1 year$2,367 $— $2,367 
≥ 1 and < 3 years91,141 1,335 92,476 
≥ 3 and < 5 years3,572,838 1,364 3,574,202 
≥ 5 and < 10 years3,482,051 9,605 3,491,656 
≥ 10 years1,002 — 1,002 
Total$7,149,399 $12,304 $7,161,703 
 December 31, 2019
(in thousands) Agency  Non-Agency  Total
< 1 year$380
 $41,192
 $41,572
≥ 1 and < 3 years57,403
 191,255
 248,658
≥ 3 and < 5 years3,071,314
 211,767
 3,283,081
≥ 5 and < 10 years24,357,478
 2,780,858
 27,138,336
≥ 10 years291,480
 403,201
 694,681
Total$27,778,055
 $3,628,273
 $31,406,328


Measurement of Allowances for Credit Losses on AFS Securities (Subsequent to the Adoption of Topic 326)
WhenFollowing the adoption of Topic 326 on January 1, 2020, the Company purchasesuses a credit-sensitive AFS security at a significant discountdiscounted cash flow method to its face value, the Company often does not amortize into income a significant portion of this discount that the Company is entitled to earn because the Company does not expect to collect the entire discount due to the inherentestimate and recognize an allowance for credit risk of the security. The Company may also record an OTTI for a portion of its investment in the security in an unrealized loss position to the extent the Company believes that the amortized cost will exceed the present value of expected future cash flows. The amount of principal that the Company does not amortize into income is designated as a credit reservelosses on the security, with unamortized net discounts or premiums amortized into income over time to the extent realizable.
The following table presents the changes for the years ended December 31, 2019both Agency and2018 of the net unamortized discount/premium and designated credit reserves on non-Agency AFS securities.securities that are not accounted for under the fair value option, as detailed in Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
(in thousands)Designated Credit Reserve Net Unamortized Discount/Premium Total Designated Credit Reserve Net Unamortized Discount/Premium Total
Beginning balance at January 1$(1,322,762) $(603,591) $(1,926,353) $(653,613) $(607,609) $(1,261,222)
Acquisitions(568,146) 2,472
 (565,674) (737,765) (60,894) (798,659)
Accretion of net discount
 43,674
 43,674
 
 89,111
 89,111
Realized credit losses23,517
 
 23,517
 26,457
 
 26,457
Reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary impairments(10,155) 
 (10,155) (470) 
 (470)
Transfers from (to)140,703
 (140,703) 
 42,629
 (42,629) 
Sales, calls, other24,892
 226,923
 251,815
 
 18,430
 18,430
Ending balance at December 31$(1,711,951) $(471,225) $(2,183,176) $(1,322,762) $(603,591) $(1,926,353)
77



105

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table presentstables present the changes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 in the allowance for credit losses on Agency and non-Agency AFS securities:
Year EndedYear Ended
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
(in thousands)AgencyNon-AgencyTotalAgencyNon-AgencyTotal
Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period$(17,889)$(4,639)$(22,528)$— $(244,876)$(244,876)
Additions on securities for which credit losses were not previously recorded(190)(4,365)(4,555)(32,931)(11,428)(44,359)
Reductions for securities sold— — — — 246,792 246,792 
Decrease (increase) on securities with previously recorded credit losses(4,542)(666)(5,208)385 (14,466)(14,081)
Write-offs9,770 8,283 18,053 14,657 21,874 36,531 
Recoveries of amounts previously written off— — — — (2,535)(2,535)
Allowance for credit losses at end of period$(12,851)$(1,387)$(14,238)$(17,889)$(4,639)$(22,528)

The following tables present the components comprising the carrying value of AFS securities for which an allowance for credit losses has not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impairedbeen recorded by length of time that the securities had an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 20182020 (subsequent to the adoption of Topic 326). At December 31, 2019,2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company held 1,237756 and 823 AFS securities, respectively; of the securities for which 122an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded, 45 and 13 were in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve consecutive months and 1510 and 13 were in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve consecutive months. At December 31, 2018, the Company held 1,550 AFS securities, of which 290 were in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve consecutive months, and 489 were in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve consecutive months.respectively.
December 31, 2021
Unrealized Loss Position for
Less than 12 Months12 Months or MoreTotal
(in thousands)Estimated Fair ValueGross Unrealized LossesEstimated Fair ValueGross Unrealized LossesEstimated Fair ValueGross Unrealized Losses
Agency$2,371,216 $(12,031)$— $— $2,371,216 $(12,031)
Non-Agency9,613 (1,230)— — 9,613 (1,230)
Total$2,380,829 $(13,261)$— $— $2,380,829 $(13,261)
 Unrealized Loss Position for
 Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
(in thousands)Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses
December 31, 2019$3,970,743
 $(25,061) $735,727
 $(62,932) $4,706,470
 $(87,993)
December 31, 2018$4,386,946
 $(66,520) $9,501,123
 $(370,082) $13,888,069
 $(436,602)
December 31, 2020
Unrealized Loss Position for
Less than 12 Months12 Months or MoreTotal
(in thousands)Estimated Fair ValueGross Unrealized LossesEstimated Fair ValueGross Unrealized LossesEstimated Fair ValueGross Unrealized Losses
Agency$367,660 $(1,705)$24,006 $(4,454)$391,666 $(6,159)
Non-Agency— — — — — — 
Total$367,660 $(1,705)$24,006 $(4,454)$391,666 $(6,159)

78

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Evaluating AFS Securities for Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (Prior to the Adoption of Topic 326)
In evaluating AFS securities for OTTI prior to the adoption of Topic 326, the Company determinesdetermined whether there hashad been a significant adverse quarterly change in the cash flow expectations for a security. The Company comparescompared the amortized cost of each security in an unrealized loss position against the present value of expected future cash flows of the security. The Company also considersconsidered whether there hashad been a significant adverse change in the regulatory and/or economic environment as part of this analysis. If the amortized cost of the security iswas greater than the present value of expected future cash flows using the original yield as the discount rate, an other-than-temporary credit impairment hashad occurred. If the Company doesdid not intend to sell and willwould not be more likely than not required to sell the security, the credit loss iswas recognized in earnings and the balance of the unrealized loss iswas recognized in either other comprehensive (loss) income, (loss), net of tax, or gain (loss) on investment securities, depending on the accounting treatment. If the Company intendsintended to sell the security or willwould be more likely than not required to sell the security, the full unrealized loss is recognized in earnings.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded $14.3 million, $0.5 million and $0.8 million in OTTI on a total of 18, 3 and two non-Agency securities, respectively, where the future expected cash flows for each security were less than its amortized cost. As of December 31, 2019, impaired securities with a carrying value of $319.2 million had actual weighted average cumulative losses of 3.5%, weighted average three-month prepayment speed of 5.3%, weighted average 60+ day delinquency of 16.3% of the pool balance, and weighted average FICO score of 636. At December 31, 2019, the Company did not intend to sell the securities and determined that it was not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities; therefore, only the projected credit loss was recognized in earnings.
The following table presents the changes in OTTI included in earnings for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
 Year Ended
 December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Cumulative credit loss at beginning of period$(6,865) $(6,395) $(5,606)
Additions:     
Other-than-temporary impairments not previously recognized(11,724) (264) (429)
Increases related to other-than-temporary impairments on securities with previously recognized other-than-temporary impairments(2,588) (206) (360)
Reductions:     
Decreases related to other-than-temporary impairments on securities paid down1,703
 
 
Decreases related to other-than-temporary impairments on securities sold2,453
 
 
Cumulative credit loss at end of period$(17,021) $(6,865) $(6,395)


106


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Cumulative credit losses related to OTTI may beare reduced for securities sold as well as for securities that mature, are paid down, or are prepaid such that the outstanding principal balance is reduced to zero. Additionally, increases in cash flows expected to be collected over the remaining life of the security cause a reduction in the cumulative credit loss. As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s cumulative credit losses related to OTTI totaled $17.0 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, the Company sold all securities for which OTTI had been recognized prior to January 1, 2020, reducing the Company’s cumulative credit losses related to OTTI to zero.
Gross Realized Gains and Losses
Gains and losses from the sale of AFS securities are recorded as realized gains (losses) within gain (loss) on investment securities in the Company’s consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). income. The following table presents details around sales of AFS securities during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:
Year Ended
December 31,
(in thousands)202120202019
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities$6,274,193 $18,349,338 $15,879,823 
Amortized cost of available-for-sale securities sold(6,137,824)(19,273,667)(15,595,809)
Total realized gains (losses) on sales, net$136,369 $(924,329)$284,014 
Gross realized gains$167,269 $337,360 $408,861 
Gross realized losses(30,900)(1,261,689)(124,847)
Total realized gains (losses) on sales, net$136,369 $(924,329)$284,014 
 Year Ended
 December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities$15,879,823
 $15,202,406
 $8,708,941
Amortized cost of available-for-sale securities sold(15,595,809) (15,551,968) (8,741,432)
Total realized gains (losses) on sales, net$284,014
 $(349,562) $(32,491)
      
Gross realized gains$408,861
 $70,076
 $67,764
Gross realized losses(124,847) (419,638) (100,255)
Total realized gains (losses) on sales, net$284,014
 $(349,562) $(32,491)


Note 5. Servicing Activities
Mortgage Servicing Rights, at Fair Value
OneA wholly owned subsidiary of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiariesCompany has approvals from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to own and manage MSR, which represent the right to control the servicing of residential mortgage loans. The Company and its subsidiaries do not originate or directly service mortgage loans, and instead contract with appropriately licensed subservicers to handle substantially all servicing functions in the name of the subservicer for the loans underlying the Company’s MSR.
79

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes activity related to MSR for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017.2019.
Year EndedYear Ended
December 31,December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017(in thousands)202120202019
Balance at beginning of period$1,993,440
 $1,086,717
 $693,815
Balance at beginning of period$1,596,153 $1,909,444 $1,993,440 
Purchases of mortgage servicing rights627,815
 988,283
 499,866
Purchases of mortgage servicing rights777,305 623,284 627,815 
Additions from sales of residential mortgage loans
 
 20
Sales of mortgage servicing rights2,306
 
 (946)Sales of mortgage servicing rights(43,411)1,976 2,306 
Changes in fair value due to:     Changes in fair value due to:
Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions used in the valuation model(390,149) 80,209
 6,339
Other changes in fair value (1)
(307,918) (149,879) (96,781)
Other changes (2)
(16,050) (11,890) (15,596)
Balance at end of period$1,909,444
 $1,993,440
 $1,086,717
Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions used in the valuation model (1)
Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions used in the valuation model (1)
562,843 (396,900)(390,149)
Other changes in fair value (2)
Other changes in fair value (2)
(666,160)(538,761)(307,918)
Other changes (3)
Other changes (3)
(35,152)(2,890)(16,050)
Balance at end of period (4)
Balance at end of period (4)
$2,191,578 $1,596,153 $1,909,444 
____________________
(1)Other changes in fair value primarily represents changes due to the realization of expected cash flows.
(2)Other changes includes purchase price adjustments, contractual prepayment protection, and changes due to the Company’s purchase of the underlying collateral.
(1)Includes the impact of acquiring MSR at a cost different from fair value.
(2)Primarily represents changes due to the realization of expected cash flows.
(3)Includes purchase price adjustments, contractual prepayment protection, and changes due to the Company’s purchase of the underlying collateral.
(4)Based on the principal balance of the loans underlying the MSR reported by servicers on a month lag, adjusted for current month purchases.

At December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company pledged MSR with a carrying value of $1.6$2.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, as collateral for repurchase agreements, revolving credit facilities and term notes payable. See Note 11 - Repurchase Agreements,Note 1312 - Revolving Credit Facilities and Note 1413 - Term Notes Payable.

107

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the key economic assumptions and sensitivity of the fair value of MSR to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in these assumptions were as follows:
(dollars in thousands, except per loan data)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Weighted average prepayment speed:12.9 %19.4 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(110,222)$(121,973)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change$(210,406)$(229,676)
Weighted average delinquency:1.3 %2.2 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(3,470)$(2,038)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change$(6,947)$(4,161)
Weighted average option-adjusted spread:4.7 %4.8 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(42,188)$(28,678)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change$(82,126)$(56,211)
Weighted average per loan annual cost to service:$66.76 $68.27 
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(25,919)$(21,708)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change$(51,911)$(43,527)
(dollars in thousands, except per loan data)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Weighted average prepayment speed:14.8% 8.6%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(88,459) (67,245)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change$(188,209) (130,371)
Weighted average delinquency:0.9% 1.3%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(7,470) (6,911)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change$(15,020) (13,688)
Weighted average discount rate:7.2% 9.4%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(49,274) (62,528)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change$(95,963) (121,135)
Weighted average per loan annual cost to service:$66.62
 $69.34
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(23,932) $(24,386)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change$(48,054) $(48,972)


These assumptions and sensitivities are hypothetical and should be considered with caution. Changes in fair value based on 10% and 20% variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of MSR is calculated without changing any other assumptions. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (e.g., increased market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses) that could magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Further, these sensitivities show only the change in the asset balances and do not show any expected change in the fair value of the instruments used to manage the interest rates and prepayment risks associated with these assets.
80

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Risk Mitigation Activities
The primary risk associated with the Company’s MSR is interest rate risk and the resulting impact on prepayments. A significant decline in interest rates could lead to higher-than-expected prepayments that could reduce the value of the MSR. The Company economically hedges the impact of these risks primarily with its Agency RMBS portfolio.
Mortgage Servicing Income
The following table presents the components of servicing income recorded on the Company’s consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:
Year Ended
December 31,
(in thousands)202120202019
Servicing fee income$461,381 $416,936 $436,587 
Ancillary and other fee income2,436 1,945 1,801 
Float income4,589 24,470 63,224 
Total$468,406 $443,351 $501,612 
 Year Ended
 December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Servicing fee income$436,587
 $312,100
 $197,902
Ancillary and other fee income1,801
 1,280
 1,009
Float income63,224
 29,716
 10,154
Total$501,612
 $343,096
 $209,065


Mortgage Servicing Advances
In connection withAs the servicingservicer of loans,record for the Company’s subservicers make certain payments for property taxes and insurance premiums, default and property maintenance payments, as well as advances ofMSR assets, the Company may be required to advance principal and interest payments to security holders, and intermittent tax and insurance payments to local authorities and insurance companies on mortgage loans that are in forbearance, delinquency or default. The Company is responsible for funding these advances, potentially for an extended period of time, before collecting themreceiving reimbursement from individual borrowers.Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Servicing advances including contractual interest, are priority cash flows in the event of a loan principal reduction or foreclosure and ultimate liquidation of the real estate-owned property, thus making their collection reasonably assured. These servicing advances which are funded by the Company, totaled $45.6$130.6 million and

108

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

$39.7 $80.9 million and were included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, mortgage loans in 60+ day delinquent status (whether or not subject to forbearance) accounted for approximately 1.3% and 3.2%, respectively, of the aggregate principal balance of loans for which the Company had servicing advance funding obligations.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company entered into a new revolving credit facility to finance its servicing advance obligations. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had pledged servicing advances with a carrying value of $33.8 million and $28.5 million, respectively, as collateral for this revolving credit facility. See Note 12 - Revolving Credit Facilities.
Serviced Mortgage Assets
The Company’s total serviced mortgage assets consist of residential mortgage loans underlying its MSR assets, off-balance sheet residential mortgage loans held in previous on-balance sheet securitization trustsowned by other entities for which the Company is the namedacts as servicing administrator and other assets. The following table presents the number of loans and unpaid principal balance of the mortgage assets for which the Company manages the servicing as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
(dollars in thousands)Number of LoansUnpaid Principal BalanceNumber of LoansUnpaid Principal Balance
Mortgage servicing rights796,205 $193,770,566 781,905 $177,861,483 
Residential mortgage loans868 519,270 1,674 1,067,500 
Other assets40 — — 
Total serviced mortgage assets797,075 $194,289,876 783,579 $178,928,983 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)Number of Loans Unpaid Principal Balance Number of Loans Unpaid Principal Balance
Mortgage servicing rights793,470
 $175,882,142
 717,167
 $163,102,308
Residential mortgage loans in securitization trusts3,157
 2,033,951
 3,612
 2,392,471
Other assets71
 12,511
 220
 34,374
Total serviced mortgage assets796,698
 $177,928,604
 720,999
 $165,529,153


Note 6. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in bank accounts and cash held in money market funds on an overnight basis.
The Company is required to maintain certain cash balances with counterparties for securities and derivatives trading activity, servicing activities and collateral for the Company’s repurchase agreements and FHLB advancesborrowings in restricted accounts. The Company has also placed cash in a restricted account pursuant to a letter of credit on an office space lease.
81

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents the Company’s restricted cash balances as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Restricted cash balances held by trading counterparties:
For securities trading activity$23,800 $44,800 
For derivatives trading activity136,271 70,600 
For servicing activities26,704 19,768 
As restricted collateral for borrowings747,979 1,126,439 
Total restricted cash balances held by trading counterparties934,754 1,261,607 
Restricted cash balance pursuant to letter of credit on office lease60 60 
Total$934,814 $1,261,667 
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Restricted cash balances held by trading counterparties:   
For securities and loan trading activity$45,050
 $51,350
For derivatives trading activity94,570
 219,900
As restricted collateral for repurchase agreements and Federal Home Loan Bank advances919,010
 416,696
Total restricted cash balances held by trading counterparties1,058,630
 687,946
Restricted cash balance pursuant to letter of credit on office lease60
 60
Total$1,058,690
 $688,006


The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 20182020 that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the statements of cash flows:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Cash and cash equivalents$1,153,856 $1,384,764 
Restricted cash934,814 1,261,667 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$2,088,670 $2,646,431 
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Cash and cash equivalents$558,136
 $409,758
Restricted cash1,058,690
 688,006
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$1,616,826
 $1,097,764



109

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company enters into a variety of derivative and non-derivative instruments in connection with its risk management activities. The primary objective for executing these derivative and non-derivative instruments is to mitigate the Company’s economic exposure to future events that are outside its control, principally market risk and cash flow volatility associated with interest rate risk (including associated prepayment risk). Specifically, the Company enters into derivative and non-derivative instruments to economically hedge interest rate risk or “duration mismatch (or gap)” by adjusting the duration of its floating-rate borrowings into fixed-rate borrowings to more closely match the duration of its assets. This particularly applies to floating-rate borrowing agreements with maturities or interest rate resets of less than six months. Typically, the interest receivable terms (e.g., LIBOR)LIBOR, Overnight Index Swap Rate, or OIS, or Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR) of certain derivatives match the terms of the underlying debt, resulting in an effective conversion of the rate of the related borrowing agreement from floating to fixed. The objective is to manage the cash flows associated with current and anticipated interest payments on borrowings, as well as the ability to roll or refinance borrowings at the desired amount by adjusting the duration.
To help manage the adverse impact of interest rate changes on the value of the Company’s portfolio as well as its cash flows, the Company may, at times, enter into various forward contracts, including short securities, Agency to-be-announced securities, or TBAs, options, futures, swaps, caps and total return swaps. In executing on the Company’s current risk management strategy, the Company has entered into interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements, TBAs, put and call options for TBAs, interest rate swap and swaption agreements and U.S. Treasury futures and total return swaps (based on the Markit IOS Index).Eurodollar futures. The Company has also entered into a number of non-derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk, principally MSR and Agency interest-only securities (see discussion below).
The following summarizes the Company’s significant asset and liability classes, the risk exposure for these classes, and the Company’s risk management activities used to mitigate these risks. The discussion includes both derivative and non-derivative instruments used as part of these risk management activities. Any of the Company’s derivative and non-derivative instruments may be entered into in conjunction with one another in order to mitigate risks. As a result, the following discussions of each type of instrument should be read as a collective representation of the Company’s risk mitigation efforts and should not be considered independent of one another. While the Company uses derivative and non-derivative instruments to achieve the Company’s risk management activities, it is possible that these instruments will not effectively mitigate all or a substantial portion of the Company’s market rate risk. In addition, the Company might elect, at times, not to enter into certain hedging arrangements in order to maintain compliance with REIT requirements.
82

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Balance Sheet Presentation
In accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815, the Company records derivative financial instruments on its consolidated balance sheets as assets or liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value are accounted for depending on the use of the derivative instruments and whether they are designated or qualifying as hedge instruments. Due to the volatility of the interest rate and credit markets and difficulty in effectively matching pricing or cash flows, the Company has not designated any current derivatives as hedging instruments.
The following tables present the gross fair value and notional amounts of the Company’s derivative financial instruments treated as trading derivatives as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018.2020:
December 31, 2021
Derivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
(in thousands)Fair ValueNotionalFair ValueNotional
Inverse interest-only securities$41,367 $247,101 $— $— 
Interest rate swap agreements— 20,387,300 — — 
Swaptions, net— — (51,743)(1,761,000)
TBAs3,405 3,523,000 (1,915)593,000 
U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures, net35,362 (5,829,600)— — 
Total$80,134 $18,327,801 $(53,658)$(1,168,000)
 December 31, 2019December 31, 2020
 Derivative Assets Derivative LiabilitiesDerivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
(in thousands) Fair Value Notional Fair Value Notional(in thousands)Fair ValueNotionalFair ValueNotional
Inverse interest-only securities $69,469
 $397,137
 $
 $
Inverse interest-only securities$62,200 $318,162 $— $— 
Interest rate swap agreements 102,268
 2,725,000
 
 36,977,470
Interest rate swap agreements— — — 12,646,341 
Swaptions, net 7,801
 1,257,000
 
 
Swaptions, net— — (596)3,750,000 
TBAs 8,011
 9,584,000
 (6,711) (2,157,000)TBAs30,062 7,700,000 (10,462)(2,503,000)
U.S. Treasury futures 502
 380,000
 
 
Markit IOS total return swaps 
 
 (29) 41,890
U.S. Treasury futures, netU.S. Treasury futures, net3,675 2,021,100 — — 
Total $188,051
 $14,343,137
 $(6,740) $34,862,360
Total$95,937 $10,039,262 $(11,058)$13,893,341 


110

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

  December 31, 2018
  Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
(in thousands) Fair Value Notional Fair Value Notional
Inverse interest-only securities $70,813
 $476,299
 $
 $
Interest rate swap agreements 187,231
 26,798,605
 
 2,725,000
Interest rate cap contracts 40,335
 2,500,000
 
 
Swaptions, net 
 
 (13,456) 63,000
TBAs 21,602
 6,484,000
 
 
Put and call options for TBAs, net 
 
 (25,296) 1,767,000
Short U.S. Treasuries 
 
 (781,455) 800,000
Markit IOS total return swaps 
 
 (383) 48,265
Total $319,981
 $36,258,904
 $(820,590) $5,403,265


Comprehensive (Loss) Income (Loss) Statement Presentation
The Company has not applied hedge accounting to its current derivative portfolio held to mitigate interest rate risk and credit risk. As a result, the Company is subject to volatility in its earnings due to movement in the unrealized gains and losses associated with its derivative instruments.
83

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes the location and amount of gains and losses on derivative instruments reported in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss): income:
Derivative InstrumentsLocation of Gain (Loss) Recognized in IncomeAmount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
Year Ended
(in thousands)December 31,
202120202019
Interest rate risk management:
TBAs(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments$(193,479)$60,798 $214,414 
Short U.S. Treasuries(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments— — (6,801)
U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments(49,213)18,143 44,474 
Put and call options for TBAs(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments(5,683)— (7,666)
Interest rate swaps - PayersGain (loss) on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements92,317 (1,128,788)(637,307)
Interest rate swaps - ReceiversGain (loss) on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements(66,828)879,289 461,801 
SwaptionsGain (loss) on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements16,602 (61,307)74,901 
Interest rate capsGain (loss) on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements— — (7,684)
Markit IOS total return swaps(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments— (2,430)(1,213)
Non-risk management:
Inverse interest-only securities(Loss) gain on other derivative instruments(2,908)13,512 16,790 
Total$(209,192)$(220,783)$151,709 
Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
    Year Ended
(in thousands)   December 31,
    2019 2018 2017
Interest rate risk management      
TBAs Gain (loss) on other derivative instruments $214,414
 $(12,521) $(46,778)
Short U.S. Treasuries Gain (loss) on other derivative instruments (6,801) (26,988) 
U.S. Treasury futures Gain (loss) on other derivative instruments 44,474
 
 
Put and call options for TBAs Gain (loss) on other derivative instruments (7,666) (18,457) (22,623)
Interest rate swaps - Payers (Loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements (637,307) 48,995
 67,124
Interest rate swaps - Receivers (Loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements 461,801
 (74,407) (17,677)
Swaptions (Loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements 74,901
 45,954
 (59,200)
Interest rate caps (Loss) gain on interest rate swap, cap and swaption agreements (7,684) (4,499) 
Markit IOS total return swaps Gain (loss) on other derivative instruments (1,213) 125
 (870)
Non-risk management        
Inverse interest-only securities Gain (loss) on other derivative instruments 16,790
 2,984
 112
Total   $151,709
 $(38,814) $(79,912)



111

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, the Company recognized $70.5 million and $49.2$14.3 million of income, and $8.8$66.2 million of expenses,expense, and $70.5 million of income, respectively, for the accrual and/or settlement of the net interest expense associated with its interest rate swaps and caps. The income/expenses resultincome resulted from receiving either LIBOR interest or a fixed interest rate and paying either a fixed interest rate or LIBORa floating interest rate (LIBOR, OIS or SOFR) and receiving either a floating interest rate (LIBOR, OIS or SOFR) or a fixed interest rate on an average $40.0$15.9 billion, $29.4$27.1 billion and $19.4$40.0 billion notional, respectively.
The following tables present information with respect to the volume of activity in the Company’s derivative instruments during the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Year Ended December 31, 2021
(in thousands)Beginning of Period Notional AmountAdditionsSettlement, Termination, Expiration or ExerciseEnd of Period Notional AmountAverage Notional Amount
Realized Gain (Loss),
net (1)
Inverse interest-only securities$318,162 $— $(71,061)$247,101 $282,380 $(398)
Interest rate swap agreements12,646,341 10,107,476 (2,366,517)20,387,300 15,870,590 (5,778)
Swaptions, net3,750,000 (2,871,000)(2,640,000)(1,761,000)(428,586)8,147 
TBAs, net5,197,000 90,927,000 (92,008,000)4,116,000 6,538,666 (175,368)
Put and call options for TBAs, net— 1,500,000 (1,500,000)— 267,123 (5,683)
U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures2,021,100 7,447,600 (15,298,300)(5,829,600)(2,197,734)(80,867)
Total$23,932,603 $107,111,076 $(113,883,878)$17,159,801 $20,332,439 $(259,947)
84

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 Year Ended December 31, 2019
(in thousands)Beginning of Period Notional Amount Additions Settlement, Termination, Expiration or Exercise End of Period Notional Amount Average Notional Amount 
Realized Gain (Loss), net (1)
Inverse interest-only securities$476,299
 $
 $(79,162) $397,137
 $437,039
 $
Interest rate swap agreements29,523,605
 35,458,291
 (25,279,426) 39,702,470
 38,951,332
 41,975
Interest rate cap contracts2,500,000
 
 (2,500,000) 
 1,060,000
 (8,690)
Swaptions, net63,000
 14,457,000
 (13,263,000) 1,257,000
 2,846,660
 61,644
TBAs, net6,484,000
 143,008,000
 (142,065,000) 7,427,000
 8,895,340
 234,716
Short U.S. Treasuries(800,000) 
 800,000
 
 (45,697) (23,172)
U.S. Treasury futures
 8,957,000
 (8,577,000) 380,000
 684,647
 43,977
Put and call options for TBAs, net(1,767,000) 
 1,767,000
 
 (110,401) (32,962)
Markit IOS total return swaps48,265
 
 (6,375) 41,890
 45,092
 
Total$36,528,169
 $201,880,291
 $(189,202,963) $49,205,497
 $52,764,012
 $317,488
Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2020
(in thousands)Beginning of Period Notional Amount Additions Settlement, Termination, Expiration or Exercise End of Period Notional Amount Average Notional Amount 
Realized Gain (Loss), net (1)
(in thousands)Beginning of Period Notional AmountAdditionsSettlement, Termination, Expiration or ExerciseEnd of Period Notional AmountAverage Notional Amount
Realized Gain (Loss),
net (1)
Inverse interest-only securities$588,246
 $
 $(111,947) $476,299
 $530,509
 $
Inverse interest-only securities$397,137 $— $(78,975)$318,162 $360,000 $(116)
Interest rate swap agreements28,482,125
 49,269,781
 (48,228,301) 29,523,605
 28,317,793
 (71,578)Interest rate swap agreements39,702,470 56,867,740 (83,923,869)12,646,341 27,137,669 (334,458)
Interest rate cap contracts
 2,500,000
 
 2,500,000
 1,054,795
 
Swaptions, net2,666,000
 (35,000) (2,568,000) 63,000
 (1,495,421) 67,985
Swaptions, net1,257,000 6,767,000 (4,274,000)3,750,000 2,188,661 (53,290)
TBAs, net(573,000) 64,988,000
 (57,931,000) 6,484,000
 4,502,888
 (35,140)TBAs, net7,427,000 60,103,000 (62,333,000)5,197,000 4,540,759 42,499 
Short U.S. Treasuries
 (800,000) 
 (800,000) (337,534) 
Put and call options for TBAs, net
 (451,000) (1,316,000) (1,767,000) (804,997) 6,839
U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futuresU.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures(380,000)13,385,800 (10,984,700)2,021,100 791,420 14,996 
Markit IOS total return swaps63,507
 
 (15,242) 48,265
 55,143
 (765)Markit IOS total return swaps41,890 — (41,890)— 10,141 (2,077)
Total$31,226,878
 $115,471,781
 $(110,170,490) $36,528,169
 $31,823,176
 $(32,659)Total$48,445,497 $137,123,540 $(161,636,434)$23,932,603 $35,028,650 $(332,446)
____________________
(1)Excludes net interest paid or received in full settlement of the net interest spread liability.
(1)Excludes net interest paid or received in full settlement of the net interest spread liability.

Cash flow activity related to derivative instruments is reflected within the operating activities and investing activities sections of the consolidated statements of cash flows. Realized gains and losses and derivative fair value adjustments are reflected within the realized and unrealized (gains) losses on interest rate swaps, caps and swaptions and unrealized (gain) lossgains on other derivative instruments line items within the operating activities section of the consolidated statements of cash flows. The remaining cash flow activity related to derivative instruments is reflected within the (purchases) short sales (purchases) of other derivative instruments, proceeds from sales and settlements (payments for termination and settlement) proceeds from sales and settlements of derivative instruments, net and increase (decrease) increase in due to counterparties, net line items within the investing activities section of the consolidated statements of cash flows.

112

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Interest Rate Sensitive Assets/Liabilities
The Company’s Agency RMBS portfolio is generally subject to change in value when mortgageinterest rates decline or increase, depending on the type of investment. Rising mortgageinterest rates generally result in a decline in the value of the Company’s fixed-rate Agency P&Iprincipal and interest (P&I) RMBS. To mitigate the impact of this risk on the Company’s fixed-rate Agency P&I RMBS portfolio, the Company maintains a portfolio of fixed-rate interest-only securities and MSR, which increase in value when interest rates increase. As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company had $122.2$274.1 million and $147.6$245.9 million,, respectively, of interest-only securities, and $1.9$2.2 billion and $2.0$1.6 billion, respectively, of MSR in place to economicallyprimarily hedge its Agency RMBS. Interest-only securities are included in AFS securities, at fair value, in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company monitors its borrowings under repurchase agreements FHLB advances and revolving credit facilities, which are generally floating-rate debt, in relation to the rate profile of its portfolio. In connection with its risk management activities, the Company enters into a variety of derivative and non-derivative instruments to economically hedge interest rate risk or “durationduration mismatch (or gap) by adjusting the duration of its floating-rate borrowings into fixed-rate borrowings to more closely match the duration of its assets. This particularly applies to borrowing agreements with maturities or interest rate resets of less than six months. Typically, the interest receivable terms (e.g., LIBOR)LIBOR, OIS or SOFR) of certain derivatives match the terms of the underlying debt, resulting in an effective conversion of the rate of the related borrowing agreement from floating to fixed. The objective is to manage the cash flows associated with current and anticipated interest payments on borrowings, as well as the ability to roll or refinance borrowings at the desired amount by adjusting the duration. To help manage the adverse impact of interest rate changes on the value of the Company’s portfolio as well as its cash flows, the Company may, at times, enter into various forward contracts, including short securities, TBAs, options, futures, swaps, caps, credit default swaps and total return swaps. In executing on the Company’s current interest rate risk management strategy, the Company has entered into TBAs, put and call options for TBAs, interest rate swap cap and swaption agreements and U.S. Treasury futures and Markit IOS total return swaps.Eurodollar futures.
The Company has certain derivative contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and is monitoring market transition plans as it relates to derivatives exposed to LIBOR and evaluating the related risks and the Company’s exposure. All of the Company’s derivative instruments that incorporate LIBOR as the referenced rate mature prior to the phase out of LIBOR. See Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion of the transition away from LIBOR.
85

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
TBAs. At times, theThe Company may use TBAs as a means of deploying capital until targeted investments are available or to take advantage of temporary displacements, funding advantages or valuation differentials in the marketplace. Additionally, the Company may use TBAs independently, or in conjunction with other derivative and non-derivative instruments, in order to mitigate risks. TBAs are forward contracts for the purchase (long notional positions) or sale (short notional positions) of Agency RMBS. The issuer, coupon and stated maturity of the Agency RMBS are predetermined as well as the trade price, face amount and future settle date (published each month by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association). However, the specific Agency RMBS to be delivered upon settlement is not known at the time of the TBA transaction. As a result, and because physical delivery of the Agency RMBS upon settlement cannot be assured, the Company accounts for TBAs as derivative instruments.
The Company may hold both long and short notional TBA positions, which are disclosed on a gross basis according to the unrealized gain or loss position of each TBA contract regardless of long or short notional position. The following tables present the notional amount, cost basis, market value and carrying value (which approximates fair value) of the Company’s TBA positions as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
December 31, 2021
Net Carrying Value (4)
(in thousands)
Notional Amount (1)
Cost Basis (2)
Market Value (3)
Derivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Purchase contracts$4,116,000 $4,238,881 $4,240,371 $3,405 $(1,915)
Sale contracts— — — — — 
TBAs, net$4,116,000 $4,238,881 $4,240,371 $3,405 $(1,915)
 December 31, 2019
       
Net Carrying Value (4)
(in thousands)
Notional Amount (1)
 
Cost Basis (2)
 
Market Value (3)
 Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
Purchase contracts$10,223,000
 $10,557,745
 $10,565,556
 $8,011
 $(200)
Sale contracts(2,796,000) (2,902,858) (2,909,369) 
 (6,511)
TBAs, net$7,427,000
 $7,654,887
 $7,656,187
 $8,011
 $(6,711)

113

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2018December 31, 2020
      
Net Carrying Value (4)
Net Carrying Value (4)
(in thousands)
Notional Amount (1)
 
Cost Basis (2)
 
Market Value (3)
 Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities(in thousands)
Notional Amount (1)
Cost Basis (2)
Market Value (3)
Derivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Purchase contracts$6,484,000
 $6,734,858
 $6,756,460
 $21,602
 $
Purchase contracts$7,700,000 $8,102,344 $8,132,406 $30,062 $— 
Sale contracts
 
 
 
 
Sale contracts(2,503,000)(2,640,465)(2,650,927)— (10,462)
TBAs, net$6,484,000
 $6,734,858
 $6,756,460
 $21,602
 $
TBAs, net$5,197,000 $5,461,879 $5,481,479 $30,062 $(10,462)
___________________
(1)Notional amount represents the face amount of the underlying Agency RMBS.
(2)Cost basis represents the forward price to be paid (received) for the underlying Agency RMBS.
(3)
(1)Notional amount represents the face amount of the underlying Agency RMBS.
(2)Cost basis represents the forward price to be paid (received) for the underlying Agency RMBS.
(3)Market value represents the current market value of the TBA (or of the underlying Agency RMBS) as of period-end.
(4)Net carrying value represents the difference between the market value of the TBA as of period-end and its cost basis, and is reported in derivative assets / (liabilities), at fair value, in the consolidated balance sheets.

Short U.S. Treasuries. The Company may use short U.S. Treasury securities independently, or in conjunction with other derivative and non-derivative instruments, in order to mitigate risks. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had short-sold U.S. Treasuries with a notional amount of $800.0 million and a fair market value of $781.5 million includedthe TBA (or of the underlying Agency RMBS) as of period-end.
(4)Net carrying value represents the difference between the market value of the TBA as of period-end and its cost basis, and is reported in derivative liabilities,assets / (liabilities), at fair value, onin the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. The Company did not hold any short U.S. Treasuries as of December 31, 2019.sheets.

U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar Futures. The Company may use U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures independently, or in conjunction with other derivative and non-derivative instruments, in order to mitigate risks. AsThe following table summarizes certain characteristics of December 31, 2019, the Company had purchasedCompany’s U.S. Treasury futures with a notional amount of $380.0 million and a fair market value of $0.5 million included in derivative assets, at fair value, on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. The Company did not hold any U.S. TreasuryEurodollar futures as of December 31, 2018.2021 and December 31, 2020:
(dollars in thousands)December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Type & MaturityNotional AmountCarrying ValueWeighted Average Days to ExpirationNotional AmountCarrying ValueWeighted Average Days to Expiration
U.S. Treasury futures - 10 year$687,900 $1,809 90$2,021,100 $3,675 90
Eurodollar futures - 3 month
≤ 1 year(3,582,000)15,121 213— — 0
> 1 and ≤ 2 years(2,269,500)14,952 560— — 0
> 2 and ≤ 3 years(666,000)3,480 854— — 0
Total futures$(5,829,600)$35,362 370$2,021,100 $3,675 90

86

Table of Contents
Put and Call Options for TBAs
. The Company may use put and call options for TBAs independently, or in conjunction with other derivative and non-derivative instruments, in order
TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to mitigate risks. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had purchased put and call options for TBAs with a notional amount of $5.4 billion and short sold put and call options for TBAs with a notional amount of $7.2 billion. The put and call options had a fair market value of $25.3 million included in derivative liabilities, at fair value, on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. The Company did not hold any put and call options for TBAs as of December 31, 2019.Consolidated Financial Statements
Interest Rate Swap Agreements. The Company may use interest rate swaps independently, or in conjunction with other derivative and non-derivative instruments, in order to mitigate risks. As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company held the following interest rate swaps that were utilized as economic hedges of interest rate exposure (or duration) whereby the Company receives interest at a three-month LIBOR rate:floating interest rate (LIBOR, OIS or SOFR):
(notional in thousands)
December 31, 2021
Swaps MaturitiesNotional AmountWeighted Average Fixed Pay RateWeighted Average Receive RateWeighted Average Maturity (Years)
2022$7,415,818 0.420 %0.070 %0.66
20232,582,084 0.113 %0.068 %1.51
2024— — %— %0.00
2025377,610 1.030 %0.050 %3.96
2026 and Thereafter2,782,057 0.652 %0.063 %6.56
Total$13,157,569 0.213 %0.067 %2.17
(notional in thousands)(notional in thousands)     (notional in thousands)
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020
Swaps Maturities Notional Amount Weighted Average Fixed Pay Rate Weighted Average Receive Rate Weighted Average Maturity (Years)Swaps MaturitiesNotional AmountWeighted Average Fixed Pay RateWeighted Average Receive RateWeighted Average Maturity (Years)
2020 $3,640,000
 1.806% 1.937% 0.83
2021 15,740,977
 1.681% 1.910% 1.472021$— — %— %0.00
2022 2,578,640
 1.911% 1.901% 2.7420227,415,818 0.042 %0.090 %1.66
2023 215,000
 3.057% 1.910% 3.9020232,281,500 0.023 %0.090 %2.48
2024 and Thereafter 8,739,092
 2.224% 1.935% 7.20
20242024— — %— %0.00
2025 and Thereafter2025 and Thereafter1,497,500 0.257 %0.090 %6.49
Total $30,913,709
 1.878% 1.921% 3.14Total$11,194,818 0.067 %0.090 %2.47


114

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(notional in thousands)      
December 31, 2018
Swaps Maturities 
Notional Amount (1)
 
Weighted Average Fixed Pay Rate (2)
 
Weighted Average Receive Rate (2)
 
Weighted Average Maturity (Years) (2)
2019 $4,336,897
 1.769% 2.565% 0.79
2020 3,640,000
 1.806% 2.689% 1.83
2021 4,117,000
 1.550% 2.687% 2.69
2022 2,470,000
 2.002% 2.728% 3.75
2023 and Thereafter 6,842,270
 2.495% 2.636% 7.60
Total $21,406,167
 1.978% 2.651% 3.75
____________________
(1)Notional amount includes $572.0 million in forward starting interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2018.
(2)Weighted averages exclude forward starting interest rate swaps. As of December 31, 2018, the weighted average fixed pay rate on forward starting interest rate swaps was 2.8%.

Additionally, as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company held the following interest rate swaps in order to mitigate mortgage interest rate exposure (or duration) risk whereby the Company pays interest at a three-month LIBOR rate:floating interest rate (LIBOR OIS or SOFR):
(notional in thousands)
December 31, 2021
Swaps MaturitiesNotional AmountsWeighted Average Pay RateWeighted Average Fixed Receive RateWeighted Average Maturity (Years)
2022$2,221,658 0.070 %0.118 %1.19
2023— — %— %0.00
2024— — %— %0.00
2025— — %— %0.00
2026 and Thereafter5,008,073 0.058 %1.049 %10.00
Total$7,229,731 0.062 %0.763 %7.29
87
(notional in thousands)      
December 31, 2019
Swaps Maturities Notional Amounts Weighted Average Pay Rate Weighted Average Fixed Receive Rate Weighted Average Maturity (Years)
2020 $250,000
 1.953% 2.258% 0.06
2021 915,000
 1.894% 2.516% 1.10
2022 
 % % 0.00
2023 
 % % 0.00
2024 and Thereafter 7,623,761
 1.937% 2.232% 8.64
Total $8,788,761
 1.933% 2.262% 7.61
(notional in thousands)      
December 31, 2018
Swaps Maturities Notional Amounts Weighted Average Pay Rate Weighted Average Fixed Receive Rate Weighted Average Maturity (Years)
2019 $
 % % 0.00
2020 250,000
 2.469% 2.258% 1.06
2021 2,477,438
 2.538% 2.736% 2.24
2022 800,000
 2.653% 2.975% 3.39
2023 and Thereafter 4,590,000
 2.653% 2.757% 7.37
Total $8,117,438
 2.612% 2.757% 5.22



115

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(notional in thousands)
December 31, 2020
Swaps MaturitiesNotional AmountsWeighted Average Pay RateWeighted Average Fixed Receive RateWeighted Average Maturity (Years)
2021$— — %— %0.00
2022— — %— %0.00
2023— — %— %0.00
2024— — %— %0.00
2025 and Thereafter1,451,523 0.090 %0.468 %9.49
Total$1,451,523 0.090 %0.468 %9.49

Interest Rate Swaptions. The Company may use interest rate swaptions (agreements(which provide the option to enter into interest rate swapsswap agreements for a predetermined notional amount, stated term and pay and receive interest rates in the future for which the Company would either pay or receive a fixed rate)future) independently, or in conjunction with other derivative and non-derivative instruments, in order to mitigate risks. As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate swaptions that were utilized as macro-economic hedges:swaptions:
December 31, 2021
(notional and dollars in thousands)OptionUnderlying Swap
SwaptionExpirationCost BasisFair ValueAverage Months to ExpirationNotional AmountAverage Pay RateAverage Receive RateAverage Term (Years)
Purchase contracts:
Payer< 6 Months$11,314 $3,539 5.33 $886,000 2.26 %3M LIBOR10.0
Sale contracts:
Payer≥ 6 Months$(26,329)$(23,958)17.79 $(780,000)1.72 %3M LIBOR10.0
Receiver< 6 Months$(10,640)$(6,856)5.11 $(1,087,000)3M LIBOR1.26 %10.0
Receiver≥ 6 Months$(26,329)$(24,468)18.91 $(780,000)3M LIBOR1.72 %10.0
 December 31, 2019December 31, 2020
(notional and dollars in thousands) Option Underlying Swap(notional and dollars in thousands)OptionUnderlying Swap
Swaption Expiration Cost Basis Fair Value Average Months to Expiration Notional Amount Average Pay Rate Average Receive Rate Average Term (Years)SwaptionExpirationCostFair ValueAverage Months to ExpirationNotional AmountAverage Pay RateAverage Receive RateAverage Term (Years)
Purchase contracts:             Purchase contracts:
Payer < 6 Months $24,700
 $16,095
 3.20
 $7,525,000
 2.27% 3M Libor 10.0Payer< 6 Months$7,210 $2,448 4.23 $2,800,000 1.32 %3M LIBOR10.0
Total Payer $24,700
 $16,095
 3.20
 $7,525,000
 2.27% 3M Libor 10.0
Receiver < 6 Months $4,100
 $342
 1.10
 $500,000
 3M Libor 1.55% 10.0Receiver< 6 Months$3,010 $— 0.97 $2,000,000 3M LIBOR0.23 %10.0
Total Receiver $4,100
 $342
 1.10
 $500,000
 3M Libor 1.55% 10.0
             
Sale contracts:             Sale contracts:
Receiver < 6 Months $(20,800) $(8,636) 3.24
 $(6,768,000) 3M Libor 1.28% 10.0Receiver< 6 Months$(2,600)$(3,044)5.13 $(1,050,000)3M LIBOR0.55 %10.0
Total Receiver $(20,800) $(8,636) 3.24
 $(6,768,000) 3M Libor 1.28% 10.0
  December 31, 2018
(notional and dollars in thousands) Option Underlying Swap
Swaption Expiration Cost Fair Value Average Months to Expiration Notional Amount Average Fixed Pay Rate Average Receive Rate Average Term (Years)
Purchase contracts:                
Payer < 6 Months $4,855
 $2,430
 5.13
 $900,000
 3.16% 3M Libor 10.0
Payer ≥ 6 Months 8,400
 5,992
 8.60
 800,000
 3.14% 3M Libor 10.0
Total Payer   $13,255
 $8,422
 7.92
 $1,700,000
 3.15% 3M Libor 10.0
                 
Sale contracts:                
Receiver < 6 Months $(4,855) $(9,001) 4.74
 $(845,000) 3M Libor 2.66% 10.0
Receiver ≥ 6 Months (8,400) (12,877) 8.60
 (792,000) 3M Libor 2.64% 10.0
Total Receiver   $(13,255) $(21,878) 7.52
 $(1,637,000) 3M Libor 2.65% 10.0


Interest Rate Cap Contracts. The Company may use interest rate caps independently, or in conjunction with other derivative and non-derivative instruments, in order to mitigate risks. The Company did not hold any interest rate caps as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2018, the Company held the following interest rate caps that were utilized as economic hedges of interest rate exposure (or duration) whereby the Company receives interest at a three-month LIBOR rate, net of a fixed cap rate:
(notional in thousands)      
December 31, 2018
Caps Maturities Notional Amount Weighted Average Cap Rate Weighted Average Receive Rate Weighted Average Maturity (Years)
2019 $800,000
 1.344% 2.422% 0.53
2020 1,700,000
 1.250% 2.766% 1.29
Total $2,500,000
 1.280% 2.656% 1.04


116

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Markit IOS Total Return Swaps. The Company may use total return swaps (agreements whereby the Company receives or makes payments based on the total return of an underlying instrument or index, such as the Markit IOS Index, in exchange for fixed or floating rate interest payments) independently, or in conjunction with other derivative and non-derivative instruments, in order to mitigate risks. The Company enters into total return swaps to help mitigate the potential impact of larger increases or decreases in interest rates on the performance of our portfolio (referred to as “convexity risk”). Total return swaps based on the Markit IOS Index are intended to synthetically replicate the performance of interest-only securities. The Company had the following total return swap agreements in place at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
(notional and dollars in thousands)     
December 31, 2019
Maturity Date Current Notional Amount Fair Value Cost Basis Unrealized Gain (Loss)
January 12, 2043 $(18,625) $5
 $(30) $35
January 12, 2044 (23,265) (34) (29) (5)
Total $(41,890) $(29) $(59) $30
(notional and dollars in thousands)     
December 31, 2018
Maturity Date Current Notional Amount Fair Value Cost Basis Unrealized Gain (Loss)
January 12, 2043 $(21,395) $(153) $(30) $(123)
January 12, 2044 (26,870) (230) (29) (201)
Total $(48,265) $(383) $(59) $(324)


Credit Risk
The Company’s exposure to credit losses on its Agency RMBS portfolio is limited due to implicit or explicit backing from the GSEs.either a GSE or a U.S. government agency. The payment of principal and interest on the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed by those respective agencies, and the payment of principal and interest on the Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
For non-Agency investment securities, the Company may enter into credit default swaps to hedge credit risk. In future periods, the Company could enhance its credit risk protection, enter into further paired derivative positions, including both long and short credit default swaps, and/or seek opportunistic trades in the event of a market disruption (see discussion under “Non-Risk Management Activities” below). The Company also has processes and controls in place to monitor, analyze, manage and mitigate its credit risk with respect to non-Agency securities.
88

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Derivative financial instruments contain an element of credit risk if counterparties are unable to meet the terms of the agreements. Credit risk associated with derivative financial instruments is measured as the net replacement cost should the counterparties that owe the Company under such contracts completely fail to perform under the terms of these contracts, assuming there are no recoveries of underlying collateral, as measured by the market value of the derivative financial instruments. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the fair value of derivative financial instruments as an asset and liability position was $188.1$80.1 million and $6.7$53.7 million, respectively.

117

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company attempts to mitigate its credit risk exposure on derivative financial instruments by limiting its counterparties to banks and financial institutions that meet established internal credit guidelines. The Company also seeks to spread its credit risk exposure across multiple counterparties in order to reduce its exposure to any single counterparty. Additionally, the Company reduces credit risk on the majority of its derivative instruments by entering into agreements that permit the closeout and netting of transactions with the same counterparty or clearing agency, in the case of centrally cleared interest rate swaps, upon the occurrence of certain events. To further mitigate the risk of counterparty default, the Company maintains collateral agreements with certain of its counterparties and clearing agencies, which require both parties to maintain cash deposits in the event the fair values of the derivative financial instruments exceed established thresholds. The Company’s centrally cleared interest rate swaps require that the Company posts an “initial margin” amount determined by the clearing exchange, which is generally intended to be set at a level sufficient to protect the exchange from the interest rate swap’s maximum estimated single-day price movement. The Company also exchanges “variation margin” based upon daily changes in fair value, as measured by the exchange. As a result of amendments to rules governing certain central clearing activities, theThe exchange of variation margin is considered a settlement of the interest rate swap, as opposed to pledged collateral. Accordingly, beginning in the first quarter of 2018, the Company began accountingaccounts for the receipt or payment of variation margin as a direct reduction to the carrying value of the interest rate swap asset or liability.

Note 8. Reverse Repurchase Agreements
As of December 31, 2019,2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had $215.6$129.2 million and $89.5 million in amounts due to counterparties as collateral for reverse repurchase agreements that could be pledged, delivered or otherwise used, with a fair value of $220.0 million.$134.7 million and $91.5 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2018, the Company held securities, consisting of U.S Treasury securities, with a fair value of $781.5 million as collateral for reverse repurchase agreements that could be pledged, delivered or otherwise used, with a fair value of $761.8 million.

Note 9. Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
Certain of the Company’s repurchase agreements are governed by underlying agreements that provide for a right of setoff in the event of default by either party to the agreement. The Company also has netting arrangements in place with all derivative counterparties pursuant to standard documentation developed by the International Swap and Derivatives Association, or ISDA, or central clearing exchange agreements, in the case of centrally cleared interest rate swaps. The Company and the counterparty or clearing agency are required to post cash collateral based upon the net underlying market value of the Company’s open positions with the counterparty. Additionally, the Company’s centrally cleared interest rate swaps require that the Company posts an “initial margin”initial margin amount determined by the clearing exchange, which is generally intended to be set at a level sufficient to protect the exchange from the interest rate swap’s maximum estimated single-day price movement. The Company also exchanges “variation margin”variation margin based upon daily changes in fair value, as measured by the exchange.
Under U.S. GAAP, if the Company has a valid right of setoff, it may offset the related asset and liability and report the net amount. As a result of amendments toBased on rules governing certain central clearing activities, the exchange of variation margin is considered a settlement of the interest rate swap, as opposed to pledged collateral. Accordingly, beginning in the first quarter of 2018, the Company began accountingaccounts for the receipt or payment of variation margin on Chicago Mercantile Exchange, or CME, and London Clearing House, or LCH, cleared positions as a direct reduction to the carrying value of the interest rate swap asset or liability. The receipt or payment of initial margin will continue to beis accounted for separate from the interest rate swap asset or liability.
Reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty and the same maturity are presented net in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets when the terms of the agreements meet the criteria to permit netting. The Company reports cash flows on repurchase agreements as financing activities and cash flows on reverse repurchase agreements as investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company presents repurchase agreements subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements on a gross basis and derivative assets and liabilities (other than centrally cleared interest rate swaps) subject to suchmaster netting arrangements or similar agreements on a net basis, based on derivative type and counterparty, in its consolidated balance sheets. Separately, the Company presents cash collateral subject to such arrangements (other than variation margin on centrally cleared interest rate swaps) on a net basis, based on counterparty, in its consolidated balance sheets. However, the Company does not offset repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements or derivative assets and liabilities (other than centrally cleared interest rate swaps) with the associated cash collateral on its consolidated balance sheets.

118
89

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The following tables present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities that are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements and can potentially be offset on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
December 31, 2021
Gross Amounts Not Offset with Financial Assets (Liabilities) in the Balance Sheets (1)
(in thousands)Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance SheetsNet Amounts of Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Balance SheetsFinancial InstrumentsCash Collateral (Received) PledgedNet Amount
Assets
Derivative assets$215,084 $(134,950)$80,134 $(53,658)$— $26,476 
Reverse repurchase agreements134,682 — 134,682 — (129,227)5,455 
Total Assets$349,766 $(134,950)$214,816 $(53,658)$(129,227)$31,931 
Liabilities
Repurchase agreements$(7,656,445)$— $(7,656,445)$7,656,445 $— $— 
Derivative liabilities(188,608)134,950 (53,658)53,658 — — 
Total Liabilities$(7,845,053)$134,950 $(7,710,103)$7,710,103 $— $— 
December 31, 2019December 31, 2020
      
Gross Amounts Not Offset with Financial Assets (Liabilities) in the Balance Sheets (1)
  
Gross Amounts Not Offset with Financial Assets (Liabilities) in the Balance Sheets (1)
(in thousands)Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities) Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheets Net Amounts of Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged Net Amount(in thousands)Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance SheetsNet Amounts of Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Balance SheetsFinancial InstrumentsCash Collateral (Received) PledgedNet Amount
Assets           Assets
Derivative assets$494,822
 $(306,771) $188,051
 $(6,740) $
 $181,311
Derivative assets$124,023 $(28,086)$95,937 $(11,058)$— $84,879 
Reverse repurchase agreements220,000
 
 220,000
 
 (215,565) 4,435
Reverse repurchase agreements91,525 — 91,525 — (89,469)2,056 
Total Assets$714,822
 $(306,771) $408,051
 $(6,740) $(215,565) $185,746
Total Assets$215,548 $(28,086)$187,462 $(11,058)$(89,469)$86,935 
Liabilities           Liabilities
Repurchase agreements$(29,147,463) $
 $(29,147,463) $29,147,463
 $
 $
Repurchase agreements$(15,143,898)$— $(15,143,898)$15,143,898 $— $— 
Derivative liabilities(313,511) 306,771
 (6,740) 6,740
 
 
Derivative liabilities(39,144)28,086 (11,058)11,058 — — 
Total Liabilities$(29,460,974) $306,771
 $(29,154,203) $29,154,203
 $
 $
Total Liabilities$(15,183,042)$28,086 $(15,154,956)$15,154,956 $— $— 
____________________
(1)Amounts presented are limited in total to the net amount of assets or liabilities presented in the consolidated balance sheets by instrument. Excess cash collateral or financial assets that are pledged to counterparties may exceed the financial liabilities subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement, or counterparties may have pledged excess cash collateral to the Company that exceed the corresponding financial assets. These excess amounts are excluded from the table above, although separately reported within restricted cash, due from counterparties, or due to counterparties in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

 December 31, 2018
       
Gross Amounts Not Offset with Financial Assets (Liabilities) in the Balance Sheets (1)
  
(in thousands)Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities) Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheets Net Amounts of Assets (Liabilities) Presented in the Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged Net Amount
Assets           
Derivative assets$599,573
 $(279,592) $319,981
 $(58,775) $
 $261,206
Reverse repurchase agreements761,815
 
 761,815
 (761,815) 
 
Total Assets$1,361,388
 $(279,592) $1,081,796
 $(820,590) $
 $261,206
Liabilities           
Repurchase agreements$(23,133,476) $
 $(23,133,476) $23,133,476
 $
 $
Derivative liabilities(1,100,182) 279,592
 (820,590) 820,590
 
 
Total Liabilities$(24,233,658) $279,592
 $(23,954,066) $23,954,066
 $
 $
90

____________________
(1)Amounts presented are limited in total to the net amount of assets or liabilities presented in the consolidated balance sheets by instrument. Excess cash collateral or financial assets that are pledged to counterparties may exceed the financial liabilities subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement, or counterparties may have pledged excess cash collateral to the Company that exceed the corresponding financial assets. These excess amounts are excluded from the table above, although separately reported within restricted cash, due from counterparties, or due to counterparties in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.


119


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 10. Fair Value
Fair Value Measurements
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices available in active markets (i.e., observable inputs) and the lowest priority to data lacking transparency (i.e., unobservable inputs). Additionally, ASC 820 requires an entity to consider all aspects of nonperformance risk, including the entity’s own credit standing, when measuring fair value of a liability.
ASC 820 establishes a three-level hierarchy to be used when measuring and disclosing fair value. An instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its valuation. Following is a description of the three levels:

Level 1Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the measurement date under current market conditions. Additionally, the entity must have the ability to access the active market and the quoted prices cannot be adjusted by the entity.
Level 2Inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in inactive markets for identical or similar assets or liabilities; or inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means for substantially the full-term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3Unobservable inputs are supported by little or no market activity. The unobservable inputs represent the assumptions that market participants would use to price the assets and liabilities, including risk. Generally, Level 3 assets and liabilities are valued using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques that require significant judgment or estimation.
Level 1Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the measurement date under current market conditions. Additionally, the entity must have the ability to access the active market and the quoted prices cannot be adjusted by the entity.
Level 2Inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in inactive markets for identical or similar assets or liabilities; or inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means for substantially the full-term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3Unobservable inputs are supported by little or no market activity. The unobservable inputs represent the assumptions that market participants would use to price the assets and liabilities, including risk. Generally, Level 3 assets and liabilities are valued using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques that require significant judgment or estimation.

The following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies used to measure material assets and liabilities at fair value and details of the valuation models, key inputs to those models and significant assumptions utilized.
Available-for-sale securities. The Company holds a portfolio of AFS securities that are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and primarily comprised of Agency RMBS and non-Agency securities. The Company determines the fair value of its Agency RMBS based upon prices obtained from third-party brokers and pricing vendors received using bid price, which are deemed indicative of market activity. The third-party pricing vendors use pricing models that generally incorporate such factors as coupons, primary and secondary mortgage rates, rate reset period, issuer, prepayment speeds, credit enhancements and expected life of the security. In determining the fair value of its non-Agency securities, management judgment may be used to arrive at fair value that considers prices obtained from third-party pricing vendors and other applicable market data. If observable market prices are not available or insufficient to determine fair value due principally to illiquidity in the marketplace, then fair value is based upon internally developed models that are primarily based on observable market-based inputs but also include unobservable market data inputs (including prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, and credit losses).
The Company classified 99.2%99.8% and 0.8%0.2% of its AFS securities as Level 2 and Level 3 fair value assets, respectively, at December 31, 2019.2021. AFS securities account for 93.7%75.9% of all assets reported at fair value at December 31, 2019.2021.
Mortgage servicing rights. The Company holds a portfolio of MSR that are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company determines fair value of its MSR based on prices obtained from third-party pricing vendors. Although MSR transactions aremay be observable in the marketplace, the details of those transactions are not necessarily reflective of the value of the Company’s MSR portfolio. Third-party vendors use both observable market data and unobservable market data (including forecasted prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, discount ratesOAS, and cost to service) as inputs into models, which help to inform their best estimates of fair value market price. As a result, the Company classified 100% of its MSR as Level 3 fair value assets at December 31, 2019.2021.
Derivative instruments. The Company may enter into a variety of derivative financial instruments as part of its hedging strategies. The Company principally executes over-the-counter, or OTC, derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps, caps, swaptions, put and call options for TBAs and Markit IOS total return swaps. The Company utilizes third-party brokers to value its financial derivative instruments. The Company classified 100% of the interest rate swaps, swaptions and Markit IOS total return swapsput and call options for TBAs reported at fair value as Level 2 at December 31, 2019.2021. The Company did not hold any interest rate caps or put and call options for TBAsMarkit IOS total return swaps at December 31, 2019.2021.

12091

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company may also enter into certain other derivative financial instruments, such as TBAs, short U.S. Treasuries, U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures and inverse interest-only securities. These instruments are similar in form to the Company’s AFS securities and the Company utilizes third-party vendors to value TBAs, short U.S. Treasuries, U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures and inverse interest-only securities. The Company classified 100% of its inverse interest-only securities at fair value as Level 2 at December 31, 2019.2021. The Company reported 100% of its TBAs and U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures as Level 1 as of December 31, 2019.2021. The Company did not hold any short U.S. Treasuries at December 31, 2019.2021.
The Company’s risk management committee governs trading activity relating to derivative instruments. The Company’s policy is to minimize credit exposure related to financial derivatives used for hedging by limiting the hedge counterparties to major banks, financial institutions, exchanges, and private investors who meet established capital and credit guidelines as well as by limiting the amount of exposure to any individual counterparty.
The Company has netting arrangements in place with all derivative counterparties pursuant to standard documentation developed by ISDA, or central clearing exchange agreements, in the case of centrally cleared interest rate swaps. Additionally, both the Company and the counterparty or clearing agency are required to post cash collateral based upon the net underlying market value of the Company’s open positions with the counterparty. Posting of cash collateral typically occurs daily, subject to certain dollar thresholds. Due to the existence of netting arrangements, as well as frequent cash collateral posting at low posting thresholds, credit exposure to the Company and/or to the counterparty or clearing agency is considered materially mitigated. Based on the Company’s assessment, there is no requirement for any additional adjustment to derivative valuations specifically for credit.
The following tables display the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company often economically hedges the fair value change of its assets or liabilities with derivatives and other financial instruments. The tables below display the hedges separately from the hedged items, and therefore do not directly display the impact of the Company’s risk management activities.activities:
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2021
(in thousands)Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:
Available-for-sale securities$— $7,149,399 $12,304 $7,161,703 
Mortgage servicing rights— — 2,191,578 2,191,578 
Derivative assets38,767 41,367 — 80,134 
Total assets$38,767 $7,190,766 $2,203,882 $9,433,415 
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities$1,915 $51,743 $— $53,658 
Total liabilities$1,915 $51,743 $— $53,658 
Recurring Fair Value MeasurementsRecurring Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2019December 31, 2020
(in thousands)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total(in thousands)Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets       
Assets:Assets:
Available-for-sale securities$
 $31,157,154
 $249,174
 $31,406,328
Available-for-sale securities$— $14,637,891 $13,031 $14,650,922 
Mortgage servicing rights
 
 1,909,444
 1,909,444
Mortgage servicing rights— — 1,596,153 1,596,153 
Derivative assets8,513
 179,538
 
 188,051
Derivative assets33,737 62,200 — 95,937 
Total assets$8,513
 $31,336,692
 $2,158,618
 $33,503,823
Total assets$33,737 $14,700,091 $1,609,184 $16,343,012 
Liabilities       
Liabilities:Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities$6,711
 $29
 $
 $6,740
Derivative liabilities$10,462 $596 $— $11,058 
Total liabilities$6,711
 $29
 $
 $6,740
Total liabilities$10,462 $596 $— $11,058 
 Recurring Fair Value Measurements
 December 31, 2018
(in thousands)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets       
Available-for-sale securities$
 $25,447,447
 $105,157
 $25,552,604
Mortgage servicing rights
 
 1,993,440
 1,993,440
Derivative assets21,602
 298,379
 
 319,981
Total assets$21,602
 $25,745,826
 $2,098,597
 $27,866,025
Liabilities       
Derivative liabilities$
 $820,590
 $
 $820,590
Total liabilities$
 $820,590
 $
 $820,590



121

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company may be required to measure certain assets or liabilities at fair value from time to time. These periodic fair value measures typically result from application of certain impairment measures under U.S. GAAP. These items would constitute nonrecurring fair value measures under ASC 820. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the periods presented. 
92

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The valuation of Level 3 instruments requires significant judgment by the third-party pricing vendors and/or management. The third-party pricing vendors and/or management rely on inputs such as market price quotations from market makers (either market or indicative levels), original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, and changes in financial ratios or cash flows to determine fair value. Level 3 instruments may also be discounted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the third-party pricing vendors in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the third-party pricing vendors due to lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s valuation committee reviews all valuations that are based on pricing information received from third-party pricing vendors. As part of this review, prices are compared against other pricing or input data points in the marketplace, along with internal valuation expertise, to ensure the pricing is reasonable. In addition, the Company performs back-testing of pricing information to validate price information and identify any pricing trends of a third-party pricing vendors.
In determining fair value, third-party pricing vendors use various valuation approaches, including market and income approaches. Inputs that are used in determining fair value of an instrument may include pricing information, credit data, volatility statistics, and other factors. In addition, inputs can be either observable or unobservable.
The availability of observable inputs can vary by instrument and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including the type of instrument, whether the instrument is new and not yet established in the marketplace and other characteristics particular to the instrument. The third-party pricing vendor uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market dislocations. In periods of market dislocation, the availability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be reclassified to or from various levels within the fair value hierarchy.
Securities that are priced using third-party broker quotations are valued at the bid price (in the case of long positions) or the ask price (in the case of short positions) at the close of trading on the date as of which value is determined. Exchange-traded securities for which no bid or ask price is available are valued at the last traded price. OTC derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, capsswap and swaption agreements, put and call options for TBAs and U.S. Treasuries, constant maturity swaps, credit default swaps, U.S. Treasury and Eurodollar futures and Markit IOS total return swaps, are valued by the Company using observable inputs, specifically quotations received from third-party brokers.

12293

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The following tables presenttable presents the reconciliation for the Company’s Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 Year Ended 
 December 31, 2019 
(in thousands)Available-For-Sale Securities Mortgage Servicing Rights 
Beginning of period level 3 fair value$105,157
 $1,993,440
 
Gains (losses) included in net income (loss):    
Realized (losses) gains, net(22,055) (313,402) 
Unrealized (losses) gains, net
 (384,257)
(1) 
Net gains (losses) included in net income (loss)(22,055) (697,659) 
Other comprehensive income (loss)(934) 
 
Purchases14,318
 627,815
 
Sales
 1,898
 
Settlements
 (16,050) 
Gross transfers into level 3550,695
 
 
Gross transfers out of level 3(398,007) 
 
End of period level 3 fair value$249,174
 $1,909,444
 
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period$
 $(331,919)
(2) 
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in other comprehensive income (loss) for assets held at the end of the reporting period$8,389
 $
 

123

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Year Ended
Year Ended December 31,
December 31, 2018 20212020
(in thousands)Available-For-Sale Securities Mortgage Servicing Rights (in thousands)Available-For-Sale SecuritiesMortgage Servicing RightsAvailable-For-Sale SecuritiesMortgage Servicing Rights
Beginning of period level 3 fair value$153,141
 $1,086,717
 Beginning of period level 3 fair value$13,031 $1,596,153 $249,174 $1,909,444 
Gains (losses) included in net income (loss):    Gains (losses) included in net income (loss):
Realized gains and (losses), net(2,538) (149,242) 
Unrealized gains and (losses), net
 80,209
(1) 
RealizedRealized(10,905)(677,784)(24,218)(544,157)
UnrealizedUnrealized(1,185)(1)562,843 (2)— (1)(391,540)(2)
Reversal of (provision for) credit lossesReversal of (provision for) credit losses11,188 — (10,593)— 
Net gains (losses) included in net income (loss)(2,538) (69,033) Net gains (losses) included in net income (loss)(902)(114,941)(34,811)(935,697)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(1,960) 
 
Other comprehensive (loss) incomeOther comprehensive (loss) income(9,449)— (4,963)— 
Purchases17,861
 988,283
 Purchases11,201 777,305 — 623,284 
Sales
 (637) Sales(1,577)(31,787)(214,673)2,012 
Settlements(153,000) (11,890) Settlements— (35,152)— (2,890)
Gross transfers into level 391,653
 
 Gross transfers into level 3— — 23,785 — 
Gross transfers out of level 3
 
 Gross transfers out of level 3— — (5,481)— 
End of period level 3 fair value$105,157
 $1,993,440
 End of period level 3 fair value$12,304 $2,191,578 $13,031 $1,596,153 
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period$
 $68,518
(2) 
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period$(1,185)(3)$461,258 (4)$— (3)$(199,016)(4)
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in other comprehensive (loss) income for assets held at the end of the reporting period$(1,818) $
 Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in other comprehensive (loss) income for assets held at the end of the reporting period$(10,635)$— $19,804 $— 
____________________
(1)The change in unrealized gains or losses on MSR was recorded in loss on servicing asset on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
(2)The change in unrealized gains or losses on MSR that were held at the end of the reporting period was recorded in loss on servicing asset on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
(1)The change in unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities accounted for under the fair value option was recorded in gain (loss) on investment securities on the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.
(2)The change in unrealized gains or losses on MSR was recorded in loss on servicing asset on the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.
(3)The change in unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities accounted for under the fair value option that were held at the end of the reporting period was recorded in gain (loss) on investment securities on the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.
(4)The change in unrealized gains or losses on MSR that were held at the end of the reporting period was recorded in loss on servicing asset on the consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

The Company transferred certain AFS securities from Level 2 to Level 3 and from Level 3 to Level 2 based the observability of inputs during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.2020. No additional AFS securities transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 were made during the yearyears ended December 31, 2019.2021 and 2020. Transfers between Levels are deemed to take place on the first day of the reporting period in which the transfer has taken place.
The Company used multiple third-party pricing vendors in the fair value measurement of its Level 3 AFS.AFS securities. The significant unobservable inputs used by the third-party pricing vendors included expected default, severity and discount rate. Significant increases (decreases) in any of the inputs in isolation may result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
94

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company also used multiple third-party pricing vendors in the fair value measurement of its Level 3 MSR. The tables below present information about the significant unobservable market data used by the third-party pricing vendors as inputs into models utilized to inform their best estimates of the fair value measurement of the Company’s MSR classified as Level 3 fair value assets at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
December 31, 2021
Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRange
Weighted Average (1)
Discounted cash flowConstant prepayment speed10.0%-17.9%12.9%
Delinquency0.9%-1.8%1.3%
Option-adjusted spread4.6%-9.2%4.7%
Per loan annual cost to service$66.04-$83.91$66.76
December 31, 2019
Valuation Technique 
Unobservable Input (1)
 Range 
Weighted Average (2)
Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment speed 12.6-16.4% 14.8%
  Delinquency 0.7-1.0% 0.9%
  Discount rate 6.4-7.8% 7.2%
  Per loan annual cost to service $63.38-$78.04  $66.62

124

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020
Valuation Technique 
Unobservable Input (1)
 Range 
Weighted Average (2)
Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRange
Weighted Average (1)
Discounted cash flow Constant prepayment speed 7.6-9.6% 8.6%Discounted cash flowConstant prepayment speed14.1%-23.5%19.4%
 Delinquency 1.0-1.5% 1.3%Delinquency1.5%-2.6%2.2%
 Discount rate 8.2-10.7% 9.4%Option-adjusted spread4.7%-9.7%4.8%
 Per loan annual cost to service $66.10-$77.32 $69.34Per loan annual cost to service$64.56-$79.43$68.27
___________________
(1)Significant increases (decreases) in any of the inputs in isolation may result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. A change in the assumption used for discount rates may be accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the probability of delinquency and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.
(2)
(1)Calculated by averaging the weighted average significant unobservable inputs used by the multiple third-party pricing vendors in the fair value measurement of MSR.

Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The Company elected the fair value option for its previously held residential mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts and the collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts. The fair value option was elected to better reflect the economicsmeasurement of the Company’s retained interests. The Company’s policy was to separately record interest income on the fair value elected loans and interest expense on the fair value elected borrowings. Upfront fees and costs were not deferred or capitalized. Fair value adjustments were reported in other income on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company sold all of these retained subordinated securities thereby causing the deconsolidation of the securitization trusts from the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The remaining retained securities are included within non-Agency AFS securities.MSR.
The following table summarizes the fair value option elections and information regarding the line items and amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for each fair value option-elected item.
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
(in thousands)Interest income (expense) Other income Total included in net income (loss) Change in fair value due to credit risk
Assets         
Residential mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts102,886
(1) 
 45,275
 148,161
 
(2) 
Liabilities         
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts(82,573)  (22,592) (105,165) 
(2) 
Total$20,313
  $22,683
 $42,996
 $
 
____________________
(1)Interest income on residential mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts is measured by multiplying the unpaid principal balance on the loans by the coupon rate and the number of days of interest due.
(2)The change in fair value on residential mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts and collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts was due entirely to changes in market interest rates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In accordance with ASC 820, the Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets, for which fair value can be estimated.
The following describes the Company’s methods for estimating the fair value for financial instruments.
AFS securities, MSR, and derivative assets and liabilities are recurring fair value measurements; carrying value equals fair value. See discussion of valuation methods and assumptions within the Fair Value Measurements section of this Note 10.
Fair Value Measurements section of this Note 10.
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash have a carrying value which approximates fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments. The Company categorizes the fair value measurement of these assets as Level 1.

125

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Reverse repurchase agreements have a carrying value which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. The Company categorizes the fair value measurement of these assets as Level 2.
The carrying value of repurchase agreements FHLB advances and revolving credit facilities that mature in less than one year generally approximates fair value due to the short maturities. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company held $50.0had outstanding borrowings of $146.3 million of FHLB advances and $300.0 million ofunder revolving credit facilities that are considered long-term. The Company’s long-term FHLB advances and revolving credit facilities have floating rates based on an index plus a spread and for members of the FHLB, the credit spread is typically consistent with those demanded in the market. Accordingly, the interest rates on these borrowings are at market and thus carrying value approximates fair value. The Company categorizes the fair value measurement of these liabilities as Level 2.
Term notes payable are recorded at outstanding principal balance, net of any unamortized deferred debt issuance costs. In determining the fair value of term notes payable, management judgment may be used to arrive at fair value that considers prices obtained from third-party pricing vendors, broker quotes received and other applicable market data. If observable market prices are not available or insufficient to determine fair value due principally to illiquidity in the marketplace, then fair value is based upon internally developed models that are primarily based on observable market-based inputs but also include unobservable market data inputs (including prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, and credit losses). The Company categorizes the fair value measurement of these liabilities as Level 2.
Convertible senior notes are carried at their unpaid principal balance, net of any unamortized deferred issuance costs. The Company estimates the fair value of its convertible senior notes using the market transaction price nearest to December 31, 2019.2021. The Company categorizes the fair value measurement of these assets as Level 2.
95

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded or disclosed at fair value at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018.2020:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
(in thousands)Carrying ValueFair ValueCarrying ValueFair Value
Assets:
Available-for-sale securities$7,161,703 $7,161,703 $14,650,922 $14,650,922 
Mortgage servicing rights$2,191,578 $2,191,578 $1,596,153 $1,596,153 
Cash and cash equivalents$1,153,856 $1,153,856 $1,384,764 $1,384,764 
Restricted cash$934,814 $934,814 $1,261,667 $1,261,667 
Derivative assets$80,134 $80,134 $95,937 $95,937 
Reverse repurchase agreements$134,682 $134,682 $91,525 $91,525 
Other assets$3,332 $3,332 $13,292 $13,292 
Liabilities:
Repurchase agreements$7,656,445 $7,656,445 $15,143,898 $15,143,898 
Revolving credit facilities$420,761 $420,761 $283,830 $283,830 
Term notes payable$396,776 $395,030 $395,609 $380,000 
Convertible senior notes$424,827 $435,774 $286,183 $291,376 
Derivative liabilities$53,658 $53,658 $11,058 $11,058 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(in thousands)Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
Assets       
Available-for-sale securities$31,406,328
 $31,406,328
 $25,552,604
 $25,552,604
Mortgage servicing rights$1,909,444
 $1,909,444
 $1,993,440
 $1,993,440
Cash and cash equivalents$558,136
 $558,136
 $409,758
 $409,758
Restricted cash$1,058,690
 $1,058,690
 $688,006
 $688,006
Derivative assets$188,051
 $188,051
 $319,981
 $319,981
Reverse repurchase agreements$220,000
 $220,000
 $761,815
 $761,815
Other assets$24,352
 $24,352
 74,412
 74,412
Liabilities       
Repurchase agreements$29,147,463
 $29,147,463
 $23,133,476
 $23,133,476
Federal Home Loan Bank advances$210,000
 $210,000
 $865,024
 $865,024
Revolving credit facilities$300,000
 $300,000
 $310,000
 $310,000
Term notes payable$394,502
 $400,000
 $
 $
Convertible senior notes$284,954
 $299,147
 $283,856
 $281,951
Derivative liabilities$6,740
 $6,740
 $820,590
 $820,590


Note 11. Repurchase Agreements
As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company had outstanding $29.1$7.7 billion and $23.1$15.1 billion, respectively, of repurchase agreements. Excluding the effect of the Company’s interest rate swaps, and caps, the repurchase agreements had a weighted average borrowing rate of 2.14%0.24% and 2.68%0.28% and weighted average remaining maturities of 7767 and 6658 days as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively. The borrowing rates quoted by the Company’s repurchase agreement counterparties typically incorporate LIBOR or SOFR as the referenced rate, plus a spread. However, the trades are executed using the all-in rate with no reference to the index quoted. Additionally, all of the Company’s repurchase agreements mature prior to the phase out of LIBOR. See Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion of the transition away from LIBOR.

At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the repurchase agreement balances were as follows:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Short-term$7,656,445 $15,143,898 
Long-term— — 
Total$7,656,445 $15,143,898 
126
96

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

At December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018, the repurchase agreement balances were as follows:
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Short-term$29,147,463
 $22,833,476
Long-term
 300,000
Total$29,147,463
 $23,133,476


At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018,2020, the repurchase agreements had the following characteristics and remaining maturities:
December 31, 2021
Collateral Type
(in thousands)Agency RMBSNon-Agency SecuritiesAgency DerivativesMortgage Servicing RightsTotal Amount Outstanding
Within 30 days$1,617,186 $— $10,097 $— $1,627,283 
30 to 59 days1,807,544 — — — 1,807,544 
60 to 89 days1,979,717 171 1,168 — 1,981,056 
90 to 119 days1,240,915 — 8,520 — 1,249,435 
120 to 364 days849,868 — 16,259 125,000 991,127 
Total$7,495,230 $171 $36,044 $125,000 $7,656,445 
Weighted average borrowing rate0.17 %1.24 %0.74 %4.00 %0.24 %
December 31, 2019December 31, 2020
Collateral Type  Collateral Type
(in thousands)Agency RMBS Non-Agency Securities Agency Derivatives Mortgage Servicing Rights Total Amount Outstanding(in thousands)Agency RMBSNon-Agency SecuritiesAgency DerivativesMortgage Servicing RightsTotal Amount Outstanding
Within 30 days$5,112,681
 $193,235
 $
 $
 $5,305,916
Within 30 days$5,330,627 $1,271 $38,608 $— $5,370,506 
30 to 59 days6,074,151
 212,998
 13,223
 
 6,300,372
30 to 59 days4,292,861 — — — 4,292,861 
60 to 89 days6,355,887
 329,493
 1,905
 
 6,687,285
60 to 89 days2,060,087 628 1,519 — 2,062,234 
90 to 119 days4,227,589
 489,352
 23,276
 
 4,740,217
90 to 119 days1,598,052 — 12,146 — 1,610,198 
120 to 364 days5,532,219
 306,529
 12,310
 262,615
 6,113,673
120 to 364 days1,808,099 — — — 1,808,099 
One year and over
 
 
 
 
Total$27,302,527
 $1,531,607
 $50,714
 $262,615
 $29,147,463
Total$15,089,726 $1,899 $52,273 $— $15,143,898 
Weighted average borrowing rate2.08% 2.90% 2.70% 3.51% 2.14%Weighted average borrowing rate0.28 %2.33 %0.89 %— %0.28 %
 December 31, 2018
 Collateral Type  
(in thousands)Agency RMBS Non-Agency Securities Agency Derivatives Mortgage Servicing Rights Total Amount Outstanding
Within 30 days$6,712,021
 $770,287
 $6,561
 $
 $7,488,869
30 to 59 days4,557,688
 496,466
 23,444
 
 5,077,598
60 to 89 days5,410,967
 242,473
 1,621
 
 5,655,061
90 to 119 days1,209,395
 722,399
 7,065
 
 1,938,859
120 to 364 days2,201,325
 463,939
 7,825
 
 2,673,089
One year and over
 
 
 300,000
 300,000
Total$20,091,396
 $2,695,564
 $46,516
 $300,000
 $23,133,476
Weighted average borrowing rate2.52% 3.65% 3.34% 4.51% 2.68%



127

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table summarizes assets at carrying values that are pledged or restricted as collateral for the future payment obligations of repurchase agreements and derivative instruments:agreements:
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value$29,575,948
 $24,240,507
Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value530,222
 685,683
Restricted cash919,010
 416,696
Due from counterparties102,365
 110,695
Derivative assets, at fair value68,874
 70,191
U.S. Treasuries (1)

 6,457
Total$31,196,419
 $25,530,229

(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value$7,009,449 $14,633,217 
Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value (1)
725,985 — 
Restricted cash747,779 1,071,239 
Due from counterparties30,764 21,312 
Derivative assets, at fair value39,609 61,557 
Total$8,553,586 $15,787,325 
____________________
(1)U.S. Treasuries received as collateral and re-pledged.
(1)MSR repurchase agreements are secured by the VFN issued in connection with the 2019 MSR securitization transaction, which is collateralized by the Company’s MSR.

Although the transactions under repurchase agreements represent committed borrowings until maturity, the respective lender retains the right to mark the underlying collateral to fair value. A reduction in the value of pledged assets would require the Company to provide additional collateral or fund margin calls.
97

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the Company’s repurchase agreements and counterparty concentration at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
(dollars in thousands)(dollars in thousands)Amount Outstanding
Net Counterparty Exposure (1)
Percent of EquityWeighted Average Days to MaturityAmount Outstanding
Net Counterparty Exposure (1)
Percent of EquityWeighted Average Days to Maturity
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)Amount Outstanding 
Net Counterparty Exposure (1)
 Percent of Equity Weighted Average Days to Maturity Amount Outstanding 
Net Counterparty Exposure (1)
 Percent of Equity Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Royal Bank of Canada$3,957,732
 $310,116
 6% 55 $2,504,438
 $342,739
 8% 94
Barclays Capital Inc.2,437,598
 216,279
 4% 99 2,508,277
 280,148
 7% 50
Credit SuisseCredit Suisse$125,000 $353,975 13 %181$— $— — %0
All other counterparties (2)
22,752,133
 1,256,063
 25% 77 18,120,761
 1,399,187
 33% 64
All other counterparties (2)
7,531,445 314,258 11 %6515,143,898 527,045 17 %58
Total$29,147,463
 $1,782,458
   $23,133,476
 $2,022,074
   Total$7,656,445 $668,233 $15,143,898 $527,045 
____________________
(1)Represents the net carrying value of the assets sold under agreements to repurchase, including accrued interest plus any cash or assets on deposit to secure the repurchase obligation, less the amount of the repurchase liability, including accrued interest.
(2)Represents amounts outstanding with 22 and 28 counterparties at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
(1)Represents the net carrying value of the assets sold under agreements to repurchase, including accrued interest plus any cash or assets on deposit to secure the repurchase obligation, less the amount of the repurchase liability, including accrued interest.
(2)Represents amounts outstanding with 19 and 20 counterparties at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

The Company does not anticipate any defaults by its repurchase agreement counterparties. There can be no assurance, however, that any such default or defaults will not occur.

Note 12. Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines Advances
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, TH Insurance Holdings Company LLC, or TH Insurance, is a member of the FHLB. As a member of the FHLB, TH Insurance has access to a variety of products and services offered by the FHLB, including secured advances. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, TH Insurance had $210.0 million and $865.0 million in outstanding secured advances with a weighted average borrowing rate of 2.00% and 2.79%, respectively.
The ability to borrow from the FHLB is subject to the Company’s continued creditworthiness, pledging of sufficient eligible collateral to secure advances, and compliance with certain agreements with the FHLB. Each advance requires approval by the FHLB and is secured by collateral in accordance with the FHLB’s credit and collateral guidelines, as may be revised from time to time by the FHLB. Eligible collateral may include conventional 1-4 family residential mortgage loans, Agency RMBS and certain non-Agency securities with a rating of A and above.

128

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

On January 11, 2016, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA, released a final rule regarding membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank system. Among other effects, the final rule excludes captive insurers from membership eligibility, including the Company’s subsidiary member, TH Insurance. Since TH Insurance was admitted as a member in 2013, it is eligible for a membership grace period that runs through February 19, 2021, during which new advances or renewals that mature beyond the grace period will be prohibited; however, any existing advances that mature beyond this grace period will be permitted to remain in place subject to their terms insofar as the Company maintains good standing with the FHLB. If any new advances or renewals occur, TH Insurance’s outstanding advances will be limited to 40% of its total assets.
At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, FHLB advances had the following remaining maturities:
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
≤ 1 year$160,000
 $815,024
> 1 and ≤ 3 years
 
> 3 and ≤ 5 years
 
> 5 and ≤ 10 years
 
> 10 years50,000
 50,000
Total$210,000
 $865,024

At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company pledged AFS securities with a carrying value of $226.5 million and $917.5 million, respectively, as collateral for advances from the FHLB. The FHLB retains the right to mark the underlying collateral for FHLB advances to fair value. A reduction in the value of pledged assets would require the Company to provide additional collateral. In addition, as a condition to membership in the FHLB, the Company is required to purchase and hold a certain amount of FHLB stock, which is based, in part, upon the outstanding principal balance of advances from the FHLB. At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had stock in the FHLB totaling $12.5 million and $40.8 million, respectively, which is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. FHLB stock is considered a non-marketable, long-term investment, is carried at cost and is subject to recoverability testing under applicable accounting standards. This stock can only be redeemed or sold at its par value, and only to the FHLB. Accordingly, when evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, the Company considers the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than recognizing temporary declines in value. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had not recognized an impairment charge related to its FHLB stock.

Note 13.12. Revolving Credit Facilities
To finance MSR assets and related servicing advance obligations, the Company has entered into revolving credit facilities collateralized by the value of the MSR and/or servicing advances pledged. As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company had outstanding short- and long-term borrowings under revolving credit facilities of $300.0$420.8 million and $310.0$283.8 million with a weighted average borrowing rate of 4.26%3.46% and 5.60%2.95% and weighted average remaining maturities of 1.201.2 and 4.251.1 years, respectively.

129

Table As of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
NotesDecember 31, 2021, each of the Company’s revolving credit facilities incorporates LIBOR as either the referenced rate or an alternative rate if the primary benchmark rate is unavailable. However, each facility has provisions in place that provide for an alternative to LIBOR upon its phase-out. See Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion of the Consolidated Financial Statements

transition away from LIBOR.
At December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, borrowings under revolving credit facilities had the following remaining maturities:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Within 30 days$— $— 
30 to 59 days— — 
60 to 89 days— — 
90 to 119 days— — 
120 to 364 days274,511 60,000 
One year and over146,250 223,830 
Total$420,761 $283,830 
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Within 30 days$
 $
30 to 59 days
 
60 to 89 days
 
90 to 119 days
 
120 to 364 days
 20,000
One year and over300,000
 290,000
Total$300,000
 $310,000


Although the transactions under revolving credit facilities represent committed borrowings from the time of funding until maturity, the respective lender retains the right to mark the underlying collateral to fair value. A reduction in the value of pledged assets below a designated threshold would require the Company to provide additional collateral or pay down the facility. As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, MSR with a carrying value of $449.5$904.8 million and $458.2$608.8 million, respectively, was pledged as collateral for the Company’s future payment obligations under its MSR revolving credit facilities. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, servicing advances with a carrying value of $33.8 million and $28.5 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral for the Company’s future payment obligations under its servicing advance revolving credit facility. The Company does not anticipate any defaults by its revolving credit facility counterparties, although there can be no assurance that any such default or defaults will not occur.

98

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 14.13. Term Notes Payable
The debt issued in connection with the Company’s on-balance sheet securitization discussed in Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies is classified as term notes payable and carried at outstanding principal balance, which was $400.0 million as of both December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, net of any unamortized deferred debt issuance costs, on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2019,2021 and December 31, 2020, the outstanding amount due on term notes payable was $394.5$396.8 million and $395.6 million, net of deferred debt issuance costs, with a weighted average interest rate of 4.59%2.90% and 2.95% and weighted average remaining maturities of 4.52.5 years and 3.5 years. The Company’s term notes incorporate LIBOR as the referenced rate and mature after the phase-out of LIBOR. However, the related agreements have provisions in place that provide for an alternative to LIBOR upon its phase-out. See Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion of the transition away from LIBOR.
At December 31, 2019,2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company pledged MSR with a carrying value of $575.1$500.0 million and $537.9 million and weighted average underlying loan coupon of 4.25%3.36% and 4.03%, respectively, as collateral for term notes payable. Additionally, as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, $0.2 million and $55.2 million of cash was held in restricted accounts as collateral for the future payment obligations of outstanding term notes payable, respectively.


Note 15.14. Convertible Senior Notes
In January 2017, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of $287.5 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2022.2022 (“2022 notes”). The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $282.2 million after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the offering of 2026 notes (defined below) to fund the repurchase via privately negotiated transactions of $143.7 million principal amount of its 2022 notes. As of December 31, 2021, $143.8 million principal amount of the 2022 notes remained outstanding, and these remaining 2022 notes matured pursuant to their terms in January 2022. The 2022 notes were unsecured, paid interest semiannually at a rate of 6.25% per annum and were convertible at the option of the holder into shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the 2022 notes had a conversion rate of 63.2040 and 63.2040 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the notes, respectively.
In February 2021, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of $287.5 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes due 2026 (“2026 notes”). The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $279.9 million after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. The 2026 notes are unsecured, pay interest semiannually at a rate of 6.25% per annum and are convertible at the option of the holder into shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2021, the 2026 notes had a conversion rate of 135.5014 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the notes. The 2026 notes will mature in January 2022,2026, unless earlier converted or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The Company does not have the right to redeem either the 2026 notes prior to maturity, but may repurchase the 2026 notes in open market or privately negotiated transactions at the same or differing price without giving prior notice to or obtaining any consent of the holders. The Company may also be required to repurchase the notes from holders under certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the notes had a conversion rate of 63.1793 and 62.4003 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the notes, respectively.
The aggregate outstanding amount due on the convertible senior2022 notes and 2026 notes as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 20182020 was $285.0$424.8 million and $283.9$286.2 million, respectively, net of deferred issuance costs.



130

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 16.15. Commitments and Contingencies
The following represent the material commitments and contingencies of the Company as of December 31, 2019:
Management agreement. The Company pays PRCM Advisers a management fee equal to 1.5% per annum, calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, of the Company’s stockholders’ equity. For purposes of calculating the management fee, the Company’s stockholders’ equity means the sum of the net proceeds from all issuances of the Company’s equity securities since inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus the Company’s retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods), less the consolidated stockholders’ equity of Granite Point and its subsidiaries during the time Granite Point was consolidated on the Company’s balance sheet, the weighted average cost basis of Granite Point common stock purchased, the outstanding principal balance of the promissory note due from the sale of Granite Point preferred stock and any amount that the Company has paid for repurchases of its common stock since inception, and excluding any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income (regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income). In connection with the acquisition of CYS effective July 31, 2018, the Management Agreement was amended to (i) reduce PRCM Advisers’ base management fee with respect to the additional equity under management resulting from the merger to 0.75% from the effective time through the first anniversary of the effective time and (ii) for the fiscal quarter in which closing of the merger occured, to make a one-time downward adjustment of Pine River’s management fees payable by Two Harbors for such quarter by $15.0 million to offset the cash consideration payable to stockholders of CYS, plus an additional downward adjustment of up to $3.3 million for certain transaction-related expenses. For purposes of calculating the management fee, stockholders’ equity will also be adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in U.S. GAAP, and certain non-cash items after discussions between PRCM Advisers and the Company’s independent directors and approval by a majority of the Company’s independent directors. To the extent asset impairment reduces the Company’s retained earnings at the end of any completed calendar quarter; it will reduce the management fee for such quarter. The Company’s stockholders’ equity for the purposes of calculating the management fee could be greater than the amount of stockholders’ equity shown on the consolidated financial statements. The current term of the management agreement expires on October 28, 2020, and automatically renews for successive one-year terms annually until terminated in accordance with the terms of the agreement.
The Company reimburses PRCM Advisers for (i) the Company’s allocable share of the compensation paid by PRCM Advisers to its personnel serving as the Company’s principal financial officer and general counsel and personnel employed by PRCM Advisers as in-house legal, tax, accounting, consulting, auditing, administrative, information technology, valuation, computer programming and development and back-office resources to the Company, and (ii) any amounts for personnel of PRCM Adviser’s affiliates arising under a shared facilities and services agreement.
Upon termination of the management agreement by the Company without cause or by PRCM Advisers due to the Company’s material breach of the management agreement, the Company is required to pay a termination fee equal to 3 times the sum of the average annual base management fee earned by PRCM Advisers during the 24-month period immediately preceding the date of termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination.
Employment contracts. The Company does not directly employ any personnel. Instead, the Company relies on the resources of PRCM Advisers to conduct the Company’s operations. Expense reimbursements to PRCM Advisers are made in cash on a quarterly basis following the end of each quarter.2021:
Legal and regulatory. From time to time, the Company may be subject to liability under laws and government regulations and various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. LiabilitiesUnder ASC 450, Contingencies, or ASC 450, liabilities are established for legal claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts established or the range of reasonably possible loss disclosed for those claims.
As previously disclosed, on April 13, 2020, the Company announced that it had elected not to renew the Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers. Subsequently, on July 15, 2020, the Company provided PRCM Advisers with a notice of termination of the Management Agreement for “cause” in accordance with Section 15(a) of the Management Agreement. The Company terminated the Management Agreement for “cause” on the basis of certain material breaches and certain events of gross negligence on the part of PRCM Advisers in the performance of its duties under the Management Agreement.
99

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
On July 21, 2020, PRCM Advisers filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, or the Court. Subsequently, PRCM Advisers filed an amended complaint, or the Federal Complaint, on September 4, 2020. The Federal Complaint alleges, among other things, the misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of both the Defend Trade Secrets Act and New York common law, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition and business practices, unjust enrichment, conversion, and tortious interference with contract. The Federal Complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining the Company from making any use of or disclosing PRCM Advisers’ trade secret, proprietary, or confidential information; damages in an amount to be determined at a hearing and/or trial; disgorgement of the Company’s wrongfully obtained profits; and fees and costs incurred by PRCM Advisers in pursuing the action. On September 25, 2020, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Federal Complaint. PRCM Advisers thereafter filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss on October 16, 2020, and on October 26, 2020, the Company filed its reply. On June 23, 2021, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion to dismiss. The Court dismissed PRCM Advisers’ claims challenging the termination of the Management Agreement, including PRCM Advisers’ claims for breach of contract with respect to Sections 13(a) and 15 of the Management Agreement and for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, as well as certain of PRCM Advisers’ other claims.
On July 7, 2021, PRCM Advisers filed a motion for leave to amend the Federal Complaint for the purpose of amending certain allegations related to PRCM Advisers’ claim for breach of contract with respect to Section 15 of the Management Agreement, and the purpose of adding Pine River Domestic Management L.P. and Pine River Capital Management L.P. as plaintiffs. On July 21, 2021, the Company filed an opposition to the motion to amend, and on July 28, 2021, PRCM Advisers filed its reply. On October 18, 2021, the Court granted PRCM Advisers’ motion for leave to amend the Federal Complaint, and deemed PRCM Advisers’ second amended complaint served. On November 17, 2021, the Company filed its answer and counterclaims against PRCM Advisers and Pine River Capital Management L.P. in the Court. On December 17, 2021, PRCM Advisers and Pine River Capital Management L.P. filed their answer to the Company’s counterclaims. The Company’s board of directors believes the Federal Complaint is without merit and that the Company has fully complied with the terms of the Management Agreement.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s consolidated financial statements do not recognize a contingency liability or disclose a range of reasonably possible loss under ASC 450 because management does not believe that a loss or expense related to the Federal Complaint is probable or reasonably estimable. The specific factors that limit the Company’s ability to reasonably estimate a loss or expense related to the Federal Complaint include that the matter is in early stages and no amount of damages has been specified. If and when management believes losses associated with the Federal Complaint are a probable future event that may result in a loss or expense to the Company and the loss or expense is reasonably estimable, the Company will recognize a contingency liability and resulting loss in such period.
Separately, the staff of the SEC conducted a non-public investigation in connection with the Company’s decisions not to renew its Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers on the basis of unfair compensation payable to PRCM Advisers in accordance with Section 13(a)(ii) of the Management Agreement and to terminate its Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers for “cause” in accordance with Section 15 of the Management Agreement. The Company fully cooperated with the SEC. On January 5, 2022, the SEC informed the Company that it had concluded its investigation as to the Company and that, based on the information provided to the SEC as of such date, it did not intend to recommend any enforcement action against the Company. The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not recognize a contingency liability or disclose a range of reasonably possible loss as of December 31, 2021.
Based on information currently available, management is not aware of any other legal or regulatory claims that would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and therefore no accrual is required as of December 31, 2019.2021.


100

131


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 17.16. Stockholders’ Equity
Redeemable Preferred Stock
The following is a summary of the Company’s series of cumulative redeemable preferred stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019.2021. In the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, each series of preferred stock will rank on parity with one another and rank senior to the Company's common stock with respect to the payment of the dividends and the distribution of assets.
As of December 31, 2019            
(in thousands)            
Class of Stock Issuance Date Shares Issued and Outstanding Carrying Value Contractual Rate 
Redemption Date (1)
 
Fixed to Floating Rate Conversion Date (2)
 
Floating Annual Rate (3)
Fixed-to-Floating Rate            
Series A March 14, 2017 5,750
 $138,872
 8.125% April 27, 2027 April 27, 2027 3M LIBOR + 5.660%
Series B July 19, 2017 11,500
 278,094
 7.625% July 27, 2027 July 27, 2027 3M LIBOR + 5.352%
Series C November 27, 2017 11,800
 285,585
 7.250% January 27, 2025 January 27, 2025 3M LIBOR + 5.011%
Fixed Rate              
Series D July 31, 2018 3,000
 74,964
 7.750% July 31, 2018 N/A N/A
Series E July 31, 2018 8,000
 199,986
 7.500% July 31, 2018 N/A N/A
 Total   40,050
 $977,501
        
(dollars in thousands)
Class of StockIssuance DateShares Issued and OutstandingCarrying ValueContractual Rate
Redemption Eligible Date (1)
Fixed to Floating Rate Conversion Date (2)
Floating Annual Rate (3)
Series AMarch 14, 20175,750,000 $138,872 8.125 %April 27, 2027April 27, 20273M LIBOR + 5.660%
Series BJuly 19, 201711,500,000 278,094 7.625 %July 27, 2027July 27, 20273M LIBOR + 5.352%
Series CNovember 27, 201711,800,000 285,584 7.250 %January 27, 2025January 27, 20253M LIBOR + 5.011%
Total29,050,000 $702,550 
____________________
(1)Subject to the Company’s right under limited circumstances to redeem the preferred stock earlier than the redemption date disclosed in order to preserve its qualification as a REIT or following a change in control of the Company.
(2)For
(1)Subject to the Company’s right under limited circumstances to redeem the preferred stock earlier than the redemption eligible date disclosed in order to preserve its qualification as a REIT or following a change in control of the Company.
(2)The dividend rate on the fixed-to-floating rate redeemable preferred stock, the dividend rate will remain at a annual fixed rate of the $25.00 per share liquidation preference from the issuance date up to but not including the transition date disclosed within. Effective the conversion date and onward, dividends will accumulate on a floating rate basis according to the terms disclosed within (3) below.
(3)On and after the fixed to floating rate conversion date, the dividend will accumulate and be payable quarterly at a percentage of the $25.00 per share liquidation preference equal to an annual floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus the spread indicated within each preferred class.

On July 31, 2018, upon the closing of the merger with CYS, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of newly classified 7.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 8,000,000 shares of newly classified 7.50% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, in exchange for all shares of CYS’s Series A and Series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock outstanding prior to the effective timewill remain at an annual fixed rate of the merger. Pursuant$25.00 per share liquidation preference from the issuance date up to but not including the transition date disclosed within. Effective as of the fixed-to-floating rate conversion date and onward, dividends will accumulate on a floating rate basis according to the terms disclosed within (3) below.
(3)On and after the fixed-to-floating rate conversion date, the dividend will accumulate and be payable quarterly at a percentage of the merger agreement with CYS,$25.00 per share liquidation preference equal to an annual floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus the terms ofspread indicated within each preferred class. Each series that becomes callable at the Company’s Series D and Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock are substantially similartime the stock begins to the terms of CYS’s Series A and Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.pay a LIBOR-based rate has existing LIBOR cessation fallback language.

For each series of preferred stock, the Company may redeem the stock on or after the redemption date in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time. The Company may also purchase shares of preferred stock from time to time in the open market by tender or in privately negotiated transactions. Each series of preferred stock has a par value of $0.01 per share and a liquidation and redemption price of $25.00, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon up to, but excluding, the redemption date. Through December 31, 2019,2021, the Company had declared and paid all required quarterly dividends on the Company’s preferred stock.

On February 4, 2021, the Company announced the redemption of all outstanding shares of the Company’s 7.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and 7.5% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The redemption date for each series was March 15, 2021 and holders of record as of such date received the redemption payment of $25.00, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon up to, but excluding, the redemption date.
Common Stock
Public Offerings
On July 14, 2021, the Company completed a public offering of 40,000,000 shares of its common stock. The underwriters purchased the shares from the Company at a price of $6.42 per share, for net proceeds to the Company of approximately $256.5 million after deducting offering expenses. The underwriters did not exercise any portion of their 30-day overallotment option to purchase up to 6,000,000 additional shares.
On October 28, 2021, the Company completed a public offering of 30,000,000 shares of its common stock. The underwriters purchased the shares from the Company at a price of $6.468 per share, for net proceeds to the Company of approximately $193.7 million after deducting offering expenses. The underwriters did not exercise any portion of their 30-day overallotment option to purchase up to 4,500,000 additional shares.
132
101

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Distributions to Preferred Stockholders
The following table presents cash dividends declared by the Company on its preferred stock during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date Cash Dividend Per Preferred Share
Series A Preferred Stock:      
December 17, 2019
 
January 10, 2020
 
January 27, 2020
 $0.507810
September 19, 2019
 
October 11, 2019
 
October 28, 2019
 $0.507810
June 19, 2019
 
July 12, 2019
 
July 29, 2019
 $0.507810
March 19, 2019
 
April 12, 2019
 
April 29, 2019
 $0.507810
December 18, 2018
 
January 11, 2019
 
January 28, 2019
 $0.507810
September 20, 2018
 
October 12, 2018
 
October 29, 2018
 $0.507810
June 19, 2018
 
July 12, 2018
 
July 27, 2018
 $0.507810
March 20, 2018
 
April 12, 2018
 
April 27, 2018
 $0.507810
December 14, 2017
 
January 12, 2018
 
January 29, 2018
 $0.507810
September 14, 2017
 
October 12, 2017
 
October 27, 2017
 $0.507810
June 15, 2017
 
July 12, 2017
 
July 27, 2017
 $0.750430
Series B Preferred Stock:      
December 17, 2019
 
January 10, 2020
 
January 27, 2020
 $0.476560
September 19, 2019
 
October 11, 2019
 
October 28, 2019
 $0.476560
June 19, 2019
 
July 12, 2019
 
July 29, 2019
 $0.476560
March 19, 2019
 
April 12, 2019
 
April 29, 2019
 $0.476560
December 18, 2018
 
January 11, 2019
 
January 28, 2019
 $0.476560
September 20, 2018
 
October 12, 2018
 
October 29, 2018
 $0.476560
June 19, 2018
 
July 12, 2018
 
July 27, 2018
 $0.476560
March 20, 2018
 
April 12, 2018
 
April 27, 2018
 $0.476560
December 14, 2017
 
January 12, 2018
 
January 29, 2018
 $0.476560
September 14, 2017
 
October 12, 2017
 
October 27, 2017
 $0.518920
Series C Preferred Stock:      
December 17, 2019
 
January 10, 2020
 
January 27, 2020
 $0.453130
September 19, 2019
 
October 11, 2019
 
October 28, 2019
 $0.453130
June 19, 2019
 
July 12, 2019
 
July 29, 2019
 $0.453130
March 19, 2019
 
April 12, 2019
 
April 29, 2019
 $0.453130
December 18, 2018
 
January 11, 2019
 
January 28, 2019
 $0.453130
September 20, 2018
 
October 12, 2018
 
October 29, 2018
 $0.453130
June 19, 2018
 
July 12, 2018
 
July 27, 2018
 $0.453130
March 20, 2018
 
April 12, 2018
 
April 27, 2018
 $0.453130
December 14, 2017
 
January 12, 2018
 
January 29, 2018
 $0.302080


133


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date Cash Dividend Per Preferred Share
Series D Preferred Stock:      
December 17, 2019
 
January 1, 2020
 
January 15, 2020
 $0.484375
September 19, 2019
 
October 1, 2019
 
October 15, 2019
 $0.484375
June 19, 2019
 
July 1, 2019
 
July 15, 2019
 $0.484375
March 19, 2019
 
April 1, 2019
 
April 15, 2019
 $0.484375
December 18, 2018
 
January 1, 2019
 
January 28, 2019
 $0.484375
September 20, 2018
 
October 1, 2018
 
October 15, 2018
 $0.484375
Series E Preferred Stock:      
December 17, 2019
 
January 1, 2020
 
January 15, 2020
 $0.468750
September 19, 2019
 
October 1, 2019
 
October 15, 2019
 $0.468750
June 19, 2019
 
July 1, 2019
 
July 15, 2019
 $0.468750
March 19, 2019
 
April 1, 2019
 
April 15, 2019
 $0.468750
December 18, 2018
 
January 1, 2019
 
January 28, 2019
 $0.468750
September 20, 2018
 
October 1, 2018
 
October 15, 2018
 $0.468750


Common Stock
Public Offering
On March 21, 2019, the Company completed a public offering of 18,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $13.76 per share. On March 22, 2019, an additional 2,700,000 shares were sold by the Company to the underwriters of the offering pursuant to an overallotment option. The net proceeds to the Company were approximately $284.5 million, after deducting offering expenses of approximately $0.3 million.
Issuance of Common Stock in Connection with Acquisition of CYS Investments, Inc.
On July 31, 2018, in exchange for all of the shares of CYS common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, the Company issued approximately 72.6 million new shares of common stock, as well as aggregate cash consideration of $15.0 million, to CYS common stockholders.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company had 272,935,731343,911,324 shares of common stock outstanding. The following table presents a reconciliation of the common shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:
2019:
Number of common shares
Common shares outstanding, December 31, 2016173,826,163
Issuance of common stock26,950
Issuance of restricted stock (1)
643,474
Common shares outstanding, December 31, 2017174,496,587
Issuance of common stock72,616,483
Issuance of restricted stock (1)
972,651
Common shares outstanding, December 31, 2018248,085,721
Issuance of common stock24,439,436
Issuance of restricted stock (1)
412,074
Repurchase of common stock(1,500(1,500))
Non-cash equity award compensation (1)
412,074 
Common shares outstanding, December 31, 2019272,935,731
____________________Issuance of common stock61,225 Repurchase of common stock(105,300)
Non-cash equity award compensation (1)
812,226 
(1)
RepresentsCommon shares of restricted stock granted under the Second Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, net of forfeitures, of which 1,062,901 restricted shares remained subject to vesting requirements atoutstanding, December 31, 2019.2020273,703,882 
Issuance of common stock70,065,019 
Repurchase of common stock— 
Non-cash equity award compensation (1)
142,423 
Common shares outstanding, December 31, 2021343,911,324 

134

Table of Contents____________________

(1)See Note 17 - Equity Incentive Plans for further details regarding the Company’s Equity Incentive Plans.
TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Distributions to Common Stockholders
The following table presents cash dividends declared by the Company on its preferred and common stock during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:
Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date Cash Dividend Per Common Share
December 17, 2019
 
December 31, 2019
 
January 24, 2020
 $0.400000
September 19, 2019
 
September 30, 2019
 
October 28, 2019
 $0.400000
June 19, 2019
 
July 1, 2019
 
July 29, 2019
 $0.400000
March 19, 2019
 
March 29, 2019
 
April 29, 2019
 $0.470000
December 18, 2018
 
December 31, 2018
 
January 28, 2019
 $0.470000
September 20, 2018
 
October 1, 2018
 
October 29, 2018
 $0.311630
July 13, 2018
 
July 25, 2018
 
July 30, 2018
 $0.158370
June 19, 2018
 
June 29, 2018
 
July 27, 2018
 $0.470000
March 20, 2018
 
April 2, 2018
 
April 27, 2018
 $0.470000
December 14, 2017
 
December 26, 2017
 
December 29, 2017
 $0.470000
September 14, 2017
 
September 29, 2017
 
October 27, 2017
 $0.520000
June 15, 2017
 
June 30, 2017
 
July 27, 2017
 $0.520000
March 14, 2017
 
March 31, 2017
 
April 27, 2017
 $0.500000

0
Year Ended
December 31,
(dollars in thousands)202120202019
Class of StockAmountPer ShareAmountPer ShareAmountPer Share
Series A Preferred Stock$11,680 $2.04 $11,680 $2.04 $11,680 $2.04 
Series B Preferred Stock$21,921 $1.92 $21,922 $1.92 $21,921 $1.92 
Series C Preferred Stock$21,388 $1.80 $21,388 $1.80 $21,388 $1.80 
Series D Preferred Stock (1)
$969 $0.32 $5,812 $1.92 $5,812 $1.92 
Series E Preferred Stock (1)
$2,500 $0.31 $15,000 $1.88 $15,000 $1.88 
Common Stock$205,623 $0.68 $136,842 $0.50 $455,721 $1.67 
____________________
(1)On March 15, 2021, the Company redeemed all outstanding shares of the Company’s Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock. Holders of record as of such date received the redemption payment of $25.00, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On March 24, 2020, as a result of the volatile market conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company announced that it had suspended its first quarter 2020 preferred and common stock dividends in order to preserve liquidity and long-term stockholder value. Subsequently, on April 6, 2020, the Company’s board of directors declared its first quarter 2020 preferred stock dividends, as well as an interim common stock dividend of $0.05 per share. Pursuant to their terms, all unpaid dividends on the Company’s preferred stock accrue without interest.
102

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan
The Company sponsors a dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan through which stockholders may purchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock by reinvesting some or all of the cash dividends received on shares of the Company’s common stock. Stockholders may also make optional cash purchases of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to certain limitations detailed in the plan prospectus. The plan allows for the issuance of up to an aggregate of 3,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2019, 269,9882021, 384,032 shares have been issued under the plan for total proceeds of approximately $5.0$5.7 million, of which 42,136, 28,71152,819, 61,225 and 27,19442,136 shares were issued for total proceeds of $0.6$0.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.5$0.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
Share Repurchase Program
The Company’s share repurchase program allows for the repurchase of up to an aggregate of 37,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares may be repurchased from time to time through privately negotiated transactions or open market transactions, pursuant to a trading plan in accordance with Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, or by any combination of such methods. The manner, price, number and timing of share repurchases are subject to a variety of factors, including market conditions and applicable SEC rules. The share repurchase program does not require the purchase of any minimum number of shares, and, subject to SEC rules, purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time without prior notice. The share repurchase program does not have an expiration date. As of December 31, 2019,2021, a total of 12,069,00012,174,300 shares had been repurchased by the Company under the program for an aggregate cost of $200.4$201.5 million; of these, 105,300 and 1,500 shares were repurchased for a total cost of $19.0$1.1 million and $19 thousand during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. No shares were repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2019. No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

135


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

2021.
At-the-Market Offerings
As of December 31, 2018, theThe Company wasis party to an amended and restated equity distribution agreement under which the Company wasis authorized to sell up to an aggregate of 10,000,00035,000,000 shares of its common stock from time to time in any method permitted by law deemed to be an “at the market” offering as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company terminated its prior equity distribution agreement and entered into a new equity distribution agreement pursuant to which a total of 35,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized for issuance. As of December 31, 2019, 7,490,2352021, 7,502,435 shares of common stock had been sold under the equity distribution agreements for total accumulated net proceeds of approximately $128.6$128.7 million, of which 12,200 and 3,697,300 shares were sold for net proceeds of $0.1 million and $51.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2019, respectively. No shares were sold during the year ended December 31, 2019. No shares were sold during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.2020.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 20182020 was as follows:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized gains$208,619 $661,734 
Unrealized losses(22,273)(20,133)
Accumulated other comprehensive income$186,346 $641,601 
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Available-for-sale securities   
Unrealized gains$730,043
 $498,744
Unrealized losses(40,643) (387,927)
Accumulated other comprehensive income$689,400
 $110,817

103

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The Company reclassifies unrealized gains and losses on AFS securities in accumulated other comprehensive income to net income (loss) upon the recognition of any other-than-temporary impairments and realized gains and losses on sales, net of income tax effects, as individual securities are impaired or sold. The following table summarizes reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:
Affected Line Item in the Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Amount Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Year Ended
(in thousands)December 31,
202120202019
Other-than-temporary impairments on AFS securitiesTotal other-than-temporary impairment losses$— $— $14,312 
Realized gains on sales of certain AFS securities, net of taxGain (loss) on investment securities(135,561)(530,462)(232,075)
Total$(135,561)$(530,462)$(217,763)
  Affected Line Item in the Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Amount Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
    Year Ended
(in thousands)   December 31,
    2019 2018 2017
Other-than-temporary impairments on AFS securities Total other-than-temporary impairment losses $14,312
 $470
 $789
Realized (gains) losses on sales of certain AFS securities, net of tax Gain (loss) on investment securities (232,075) 253,869
 5,207
Total   $(217,763) $254,339
 $5,996


Note 18.17. Equity Incentive Plans
On May 19, 2021, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2021 Plan, which replaced the 2009 Plan. The 2021 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 17,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to awards granted thereunder. Awards previously granted under the 2009 Plan remain outstanding and valid in accordance with their terms, but no new awards will be granted under the 2009 Plan.
The Company’s Plan providesEquity Incentive Plans provide incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified directors, officers, advisors, consultantspersonnel and other personnel, including PRCM Advisers and affiliates and employees of PRCM Advisers and its affiliates, and any joint venture affiliates ofparties who may provide significant services to the Company. The Plan isEquity Incentive Plans are administered by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors. The compensation committee has the full authority to administer and interpret the Plan,Equity Incentive Plans, to authorize the granting of awards, to determine the eligibility of potential recipients to receive an award, to determine the number of shares of common stock to be covered by each award (subject to the individual participant limitations provided in the Plan)Equity Incentive Plans), to determine the terms, provisions and conditions of each award (which may not be inconsistent with the terms of the Plan)Equity Incentive Plans), to prescribe the form of instruments evidencing awards and to take any other actions and make all other determinations that it deems necessary or appropriate in connection with the PlanEquity Incentive Plans or the administration or interpretation thereof. In connection with this authority, the compensation committee may, among other things, establish performance goals that must be met in order for awards to be granted or to vest, or for the restrictions on any such awards to lapse.

136

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company’s Plan providesEquity Incentive Plans provide for grants of restricted common stock, RSUs, performance-based awards (including PSUs), phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards,awards. The 2021 Plan is subject to a ceiling of 17,000,000 shares and the 2009 Plan is subject to a ceiling of 6,500,000 shares available for issuanceof the Company’s common stock; however, following stockholder approval of the 2021 Plan, no new awards will be granted under the 2009 Plan. The Plan allowsEquity Incentive Plans allow for the Company’s board of directors to expand the types of awards available under the PlanEquity Incentive Plans to include long-term incentive plan units in the future. If an award granted under the PlanEquity Incentive Plans expires or terminates, the shares subject to any portion of the award that expires or terminates without having been exercised or paid, as the case may be, will again become available for the issuance of additional awards. Unless earlier terminated by the Company’s board of directors, no new award may be granted under the PlanEquity Incentive Plans after the tenth anniversary of the date that the Plan wasEquity Incentive Plans were approved by the Company’s board of directors. No award may be granted under the PlanEquity Incentive Plans to any person who, assuming payment of all awards held by such person, would own or be deemed to own more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock.
Restricted Stock Units
During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017,2021, the Company granted 60,108, 55,553 and 34,559 shares of common stock, respectively,147,199 RSUs to its independent directors pursuant to the Plan.Equity Incentive Plans. The estimated fair value of these awards was $13.35, $15.48 and $19.82$7.15 per share on grant date, based on the adjusted closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on such date. The restricted common shares granted in 2019underlying the grants are subject to a one-yearone-year vesting period,period.
104

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company granted 1,189,518 RSUs to certain eligible employees pursuant to the terms of the Equity Incentive Plans and the associated award agreements. The estimated weighted average fair value of these awards was $7.10 per share on grant date, based on the adjusted closing market price of the Company’s common shares grantedstock on the NYSE on the grant dates. The RSUs vest in 2018three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date, as long as such grantee complies with the terms and 2017 vested immediately.conditions of the applicable RSU agreement.
Additionally,All RSUs entitle the grantee to receive dividend equivalent rights, or DERs, during the vesting period. A DER represents the right to receive a payment equal to the amount of cash dividends declared and payable on the grantee’s unvested and outstanding equity incentive awards. In the case of RSUs, DERs are paid in cash within 60 days of the quarterly dividend payment date based on the number of unvested and outstanding RSUs held by the grantee on the applicable dividend record date. In the event that an RSU is forfeited, the related DERs which have not yet been paid shall be forfeited.
The following table summarizes the activity related to RSUs for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021 and 2017,2020:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
UnitsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Market ValueUnitsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Market Value
Outstanding at Beginning of Period— $— — $— 
Granted1,336,717 7.10 — — 
Vested(157,342)(7.15)— — 
Forfeited(5,673)(7.05)— — 
Outstanding at End of Period1,173,702 $7.10 — $— 

Performance Share Units
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company granted 455,174, 941,371 and 637,286 shares511,473 target number of restricted common stock, respectively,PSUs to the Company’s executive officers and keycertain eligible employees of PRCM Advisers who provide services to the Company, pursuant to the terms of the 2021 Plan and the associated award agreements. The estimated fair value of these awards was $14.40, $15.12$8.67 per share on grant date, which was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation. The PSUs will vest promptly following the completion of a three year performance period, as long as such grantee complies with the terms and $17.48conditions of the applicable PSU award agreement. The number of underlying shares of common stock that vest and that the grantee becomes entitled to receive at the time of vesting will be determined based on the level of achievement of certain Company performance goals during the performance period and will generally range from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted. The PSUs entitle the grantee to DERs during the vesting period, which accrue in the form of additional PSUs reflecting the value of any dividends declared on the Company’s common stock during the vesting period. In the event that a PSU is forfeited, the related accrued DERs shall be forfeited.
The following table summarizes the activity related to PSUs for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Target UnitsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Market ValueTarget UnitsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Market Value
Outstanding at Beginning of Period— $— — $— 
Granted511,473 8.67 — — 
Vested— — — — 
Forfeited(74,049)(8.67)— — 
Outstanding at End of Period437,424 $8.67 — $— 

105

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Restricted Common Stock
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company granted 20,979 and 168,942 shares of common stock, respectively, to certain of its independent directors pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plans. The estimated fair value of these awards was $7.15 and $4.75 per share on grant date, based on the adjusted closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on such date. The shares underlying the 2021 grants vested immediately, while the shares underlying the 2020 grants were subject to a one-year vesting period.
Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company granted 686,770 shares of restricted common stock, to the Company’s executive officers and other eligible individuals, pursuant to the terms of the Equity Incentive Plans and the associated award agreements. The estimated fair value of these awards was $15.23 per share on grant date, based on the adjusted closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on such date. The shares underlying the grants vest in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date, as long as such grantee complies with the terms and conditions of his or herthe applicable restricted stock award agreement.
The following table summarizes the activity related to restricted common stock for the yearyears ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
SharesWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Market ValueSharesWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Market Value
Outstanding at Beginning of Period1,221,995 $13.61 1,062,901 $15.05 
Granted20,979 7.15 855,712 13.16 
Vested(754,119)(12.94)(653,132)(15.30)
Forfeited(35,898)(5.72)(43,486)(14.58)
Outstanding at End of Period452,957 $15.04 1,221,995 $13.61 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
 Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Market Value Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Market Value
Outstanding at Beginning of Period1,593,701
 $15.81
 1,284,010
 $17.15
Granted515,282
 14.28
 996,924
 14.96
Vested(942,874) (14.63) (673,118) (17.12)
Forfeited(103,208) (15.52) (14,115) (15.59)
Outstanding at End of Period1,062,901
 $16.14
 1,593,701
 $15.81


Non-Cash Equity Compensation Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, the Company recognized compensation related to RSUs, PSUs and restricted common stock granted pursuant to the PlanEquity Incentive Plans of $11.5 million, $9.7 million and $9.2 million $13.0respectively. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $6.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years.

Note 18. Restructuring Charges
On April 13, 2020, the Company announced that it had elected to not renew the Management Agreement with PRCM Advisers on the basis of unfair compensation payable to the manager pursuant to Section 13(a)(ii) of the Management Agreement. As a result, the Company had expected the Management Agreement to terminate on September 19, 2020, at which time the Company would have been required to pay a termination fee equal to 3 times the sum of the average annual base management fee earned by PRCM Advisers during the 24-month period immediately preceding the date of termination, calculated as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination, pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement. The termination fee was calculated to be $139.8 million based on results as of June 30, 2020 and $11.3recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2020.
On July 15, 2020, the Company provided PRCM Advisers with a notice of termination of the Management Agreement for “cause” on the basis of certain material breaches of the Management Agreement by PRCM Advisers, its agents and/or its assignees that are incapable of being cured within the time period set forth therein and certain events of gross negligence on the part of PRCM Advisers in the performance of its duties under the Management Agreement. The Management Agreement subsequently terminated on August 14, 2020. No termination fee was payable to PRCM Advisers in connection with such termination pursuant to Section 15(a) of the Management Agreement.
106

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In connection with the termination of the Management Agreement for cause, the Company reversed the $139.8 million respectively. accrued fee attributable to the non-renewal during the three months ended September 30, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company incurred a total of $5.7 million in contract termination costs, which includes all estimated costs incurred for legal and advisory services provided to facilitate the termination of the Management Agreement. In accordance with ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, all expenses incurred for contract terminations are included within restructuring charges on the Company’s consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income.

Note 19. Income Taxes
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, the Company qualified to be taxed as a REIT under the Code for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As long as the Company qualifies as a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on its taxable income to the extent it annually distributes its net taxable income to stockholders, and does not engage in prohibited transactions. The Company intends to distribute 100% of its REIT taxable income and comply with all requirements to continue to qualify as a REIT. The majority of states also recognize the Company’s REIT status. The Company’s TRSs file separate tax returns and are fully taxed as standalone U.S. C corporations. It is assumed that the Company will retain its REIT status and will incur no REIT level taxation as it intends to comply with the REIT regulations and annual distribution requirements.
Certain activities the Company performs may produce income that will not be qualifying income for REIT purposes. These activities include the designated portion of MSR treated as normal mortgage servicing, residential mortgage loans, certain derivative financial instruments and other risk-management instruments. The Company has designated its TRSs to engage in these activities.

137

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table summarizes the tax (benefit) provision from continuing operations(benefit) recorded at the taxable subsidiary level for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:
Year Ended
December 31,
(in thousands)202120202019
Current tax (benefit) provision:
Federal$— $3,275 $8,684 
State(1,768)1,304 2,668 
Total current tax (benefit) provision(1,768)4,579 11,352 
Deferred tax provision (benefit)
Federal14,851 (40,267)(24,912)
State(8,891)— — 
Total deferred tax provision (benefit)5,960 (40,267)(24,912)
Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes$4,192 $(35,688)$(13,560)
 Year Ended
 December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Current tax provision:     
Federal$8,684
 $52
 $492
State2,668
 1
 57
Total current tax provision11,352
 53
 549
Deferred tax (benefit) provision(24,912) 41,770
 (11,031)
Total (benefit from) provision for income taxes$(13,560) $41,823
 $(10,482)


During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company’s TRSs recognized a provision for income taxes of $4.2 million, which was primarily due to income from MSR servicing activity and gains recognized on MSR, offset by net losses recognized on derivative instruments and operating expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company’s TRSs recognized a benefit from income taxes of $35.7 million, which was primarily due to losses recognized on MSR, offset by net gains recognized on derivative instruments held in the Company’s TRSs. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s TRSs recognized a benefit from income taxes of $13.6 million, which was primarily due to losses recognized on MSR, offset by net gains recognized on derivative instruments held in the Company’s TRSs. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company’s TRSs recognized a provision for income taxes of $41.8 million, which was primarily due to realized gains on sales of AFS securities and gains recognized on MSR held in the TRSs as well as the write-down of net deferred tax assets resulting from the deemed liquidation of one of the Company’s TRSs due to its TRS election revocation, offset by net losses incurred on derivative instruments held in the TRSs. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company’s TRSs recognized a benefit from income taxes of $10.5 million, which was primarily due to the remeasurement of federal net deferred tax assets resulting from the permanent reduction in the U.S. statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, realized losses on sales of AFS securities and net losses incurred on derivative instruments held in the Company’s TRSs.
The Company’s taxable income before dividend distributions differs from its pre-tax net income for U.S. GAAP purposes primarily due to unrealized gains and losses, the deferral of capital losses and operating losses for tax, the recognition of credit losses for U.S. GAAP purposes but not tax purposes, differences in timing of income recognition due to market discount and original issue discount and the calculations surrounding each. These book to tax differences in the REIT are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements as the Company intends to retain its REIT status.
107

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $641.1 million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes at the REIT, which may be utilized to offset future taxable income after consideration for the dividends paid deduction. These federal net operating loss carryforwards do not have an expiration date and can be carried forward indefinitely. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $1.2 billion of capital net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes at the REIT, which may be utilized to offset future net gains from the sale of capital assets. These federal capital net operating loss carryforwards have an expiration date of five years of which the majority of these losses will expire in 2025. The utilization of the capital net operating loss carryforwards will depend on the REIT’s ability to generate sufficient net capital gains prior to the expiration of the carryforward period.
The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal and state rates to the effective rates, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:
 Year Ended
 December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
(dollars in thousands)Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
Computed income tax expense at federal rate$65,184
 21 % $(518) 21 % $104,215
 35 %
State taxes, net of federal benefit, if applicable2,108
 1 % 1
  % 37
  %
Permanent differences in taxable income from GAAP net income702
  % 28,414
 (1,152)% 1,208
  %
Dividends paid deduction(81,554) (26)% 13,926
 (565)% (115,942) (39)%
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes/ Effective Tax Rate(1)
$(13,560) (4)% $41,823
 (1,696)% $(10,482) (4)%
Year Ended
December 31,
202120202019
(dollars in thousands)AmountPercentAmountPercentAmountPercent
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes at statutory federal tax rate$40,198 21 %$(349,823)21 %$65,184 21 %
State taxes, net of federal benefit, if applicable(8,420)(4)%1,030 — %2,108 %
Permanent differences in taxable income from net income for U.S. GAAP purposes15 — %(3,525)— %702 — %
REIT income not subject to corporate income tax(27,601)(14)%316,630 (19)%(81,554)(26)%
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes/ Effective Tax Rate(1)
$4,192 %$(35,688)%$(13,560)(4)%
____________________
(1)The (benefit from) provision for income taxes is recorded at the taxable subsidiary level.

(1)The provision for (benefit from) income taxes is recorded at the taxable subsidiary level.

138

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company’s permanent differences in taxable income from GAAP net income (loss) for U.S. GAAP purposes in the year ended December 31, 2021 were primarily due to state taxes, net of federal benefit in the Company’s TRSs. The Company’s permanent differences in taxable income from net income (loss) for U.S. GAAP purposes in the year ended December 31, 2020 were primarily due to the intercompany sale of securities between the Company’s TRSs and the REIT. The Company’s permanent differences in taxable income from net income (loss) for U.S. GAAP purposes in the year ended December 31, 2019 were primarily due to dividends paid from the Company’s TRSs to the REIT, offset by permanent differences related to the intercompany sale of securities between the Company’s TRSs and the REIT. The Company’s permanent differences in taxable income from GAAP net income (loss) in the year ended December 31, 2018 were primarily due to the intercompany sales of securities between the Company’s TRSs and the REIT, as well as the write-down of net deferred tax assets resulting from the deemed liquidation of three of the Company’s TRSs due to their TRS election revocation, offset by the reversal of the valuation allowance upon TRS revocation. The Company’s permanent differences in taxable income from GAAP net income (loss) in the year ended December 31, 2017 were primarily due to a provision of $17.5 million related to the effect of the federal tax reform statutory rate change from 35% to 21%, offset by net losses incurred by consolidated securitization trusts that were not subject to federal taxes and permanent differences related to discontinued operations. Additionally, the Company’s recurring permanent differences in taxable income from GAAP net income (loss) for U.S. GAAP purposes in the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 were due to a difference in the dividends paid deduction for tax and compensation expense related to restricted stock dividends.dividends and vesting.
The Company’s consolidated balance sheets, as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 20182020 contain the following current and deferred tax liabilities and assets, which are included in other assets, and are recorded at the taxable subsidiary level:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Income taxes receivable:
Federal income taxes receivable$— $22,504 
State and local income taxes receivable951 — 
Income taxes receivable, net951 22,504 
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Deferred tax asset58,264 64,024 
Deferred tax liability(200)— 
Total net deferred tax assets (liabilities)58,064 64,024 
Total tax assets (liabilities), net$59,015 $86,528 
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Income taxes receivable   
Federal income taxes receivable$17,539
 $690
State and local income taxes receivable
 
Income taxes receivable, net17,539
 690
Deferred tax assets (liabilities)   
Deferred tax asset23,756
 17,196
Deferred tax liability(19) (18,333)
Total net deferred tax assets (liabilities)23,737
 (1,137)
Total tax assets (liabilities), net$41,276
 $(447)

108

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes at the TRS level. Components of the Company’s deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 20182020 were as follows:
(in thousands)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Mortgage servicing rights$26,382 $62,881 
Net operating loss carryforward30,569 — 
Other1,113 1,143 
Total deferred tax assets (liabilities)58,064 64,024 
Valuation allowance— — 
Total net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$58,064 $64,024 
(in thousands)December 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Available-for-sale securities$(19) $19
Mortgage servicing rights23,110
 (18,333)
Derivative assets and liabilities67
 33
Other assets12
 9
Other liabilities463
 652
Intangibles90
 101
Net operating loss carryforward7
 16,354
Capital loss carryforward7
 28
Total deferred tax assets (liabilities)23,737
 (1,137)
Valuation allowance
 
Total net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$23,737
 $(1,137)



139

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, the Company had not recorded a valuation allowance for any portion of its deferred tax assets as it did not believe, at a more likely than not level, that any portion of its deferred tax assets would not be realized.
Based on the Company’s evaluation, it has been concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s consolidated financial statements of a contingent tax liability for uncertain tax positions. Additionally, there were no amounts accrued for penalties or interest as of or during the periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.

109

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 20. Earnings Per Share
The following table presents a reconciliation of the earnings (loss) and shares used in calculating basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:
 Year Ended
 December 31,
(in thousands, except share data)2019 2018 2017
Numerator:     
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$323,962
 $(44,290) $308,239
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 44,146
Net income (loss)$323,962
 $(44,290) 352,385
Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
 3,814
Net income (loss) attributable to Two Harbors Investment Corp.323,962
 (44,290) 348,571
Dividends on preferred stock75,801
 65,395
 25,122
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders - basic248,161
 (109,685) 323,449
Interest expense attributable to convertible notes (1)

 
 17,867
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders - diluted$248,161
 $(109,685) $341,316
Denominator:     
Weighted average common shares outstanding266,594,154
 204,409,853
 173,063,178
Weighted average restricted stock shares1,232,585
 1,610,649
 1,370,821
Basic weighted average shares outstanding267,826,739
 206,020,502
 174,433,999
Effect of dilutive shares issued in an assumed conversion
 
 13,699,342
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding267,826,739
 206,020,502
 188,133,341
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:     
Continuing operations$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.62
Discontinued operations
 
 0.23
Net income (loss)$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.85
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:     
Continuing operations$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.60
Discontinued operations
 
 0.21
Net income (loss)$0.93
 $(0.53) $1.81

Year Ended
December 31,
(in thousands, except share data)202120202019
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Net (loss) income$187,227 $(1,630,135)$323,962 
Dividends on preferred stock58,458 75,802 75,801 
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating restricted stock units731 — — 
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders, basic$128,038 $(1,705,937)$248,161 
Basic weighted average common shares297,772,001 273,600,947 267,826,739 
Basic (loss) earnings per weighted average common share$0.43 $(6.24)$0.93 
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders, basic$128,038 $(1,705,937)$248,161 
Reallocation impact of undistributed earnings to participating restricted stock units— — — 
Interest expense attributable to convertible notes (1)
— — — 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, diluted$128,038 $(1,705,937)$248,161 
Basic weighted average common shares297,772,001 273,600,947 267,826,739 
Effect of dilutive shares issued in an assumed vesting of performance share units271,537 — — 
Effect of dilutive shares issued in an assumed conversion— — — 
Diluted weighted average common shares298,043,538 273,600,947 267,826,739 
Diluted (loss) earnings per weighted average common share$0.43 $(6.24)$0.93 
___________________
(1)Includes a nondiscretionary adjustment for the assumed change in the management fee calculation.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share is the effect of adding back $19.0 million of interest expense, net of(1)If applicable, includes a nondiscretionary adjustment for the assumed change in the management fee calculation.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, participating RSUs were included in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share under the two-class method since it was more dilutive than the alternative treasury stock method. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the assumed vesting of outstanding PSUs was included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share under the two-class method since it was more dilutive than the alternative treasury stock method. The Company did not have any RSUs or PSUs outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share was the effect of adding back $28.0 million, $19.2 million and $19.0 million of interest expense and 50,222,268, 18,171,150 and 18,128,792 weighted average common share equivalents, respectively, related to the assumed conversion of the Company’s convertible senior notes, as their inclusion would behave been antidilutive.

140

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the year ended December 31, 2018, excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share is the effect of adding back $18.9 million of interest expense, net of a nondiscretionary adjustment for the assumed change in the management fee calculation, and 17,806,090 weighted average common share equivalents related to the assumed conversion of the Company’s convertible senior notes, as their inclusion would be antidilutive.

Note 21. Related Party Transactions
The following summary provides disclosure of the material transactions with affiliates of the Company.
In accordance withThrough August 14, 2020, the Company was externally managed and advised by PRCM Advisers under the terms of a Management Agreement between the Company and PRCM Advisers. The Company terminated the Management Agreement effective August 14, 2020 for “cause” in accordance with Section 15(a) thereof. On August 15, 2020, the Company completed its transition to self-management and directly hired the senior management team and other personnel who had historically provided services to the Company. Prior to the termination of the Management Agreement, all of our named executive officers were employees of an affiliate of PRCM Advisers datedand provided services to us under the Management Agreement.
110

Table of Contents

TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Prior to the termination of the Management Agreement, PRCM Advisers was responsible for administering the Company’s business activities and day-to-day operations, at all times subject to the supervision and oversight of the Company’s board of directors. Under the Management Agreement, PRCM Advisers was required to provide the Company with its personnel, including its executive officers, investment professionals and other support personnel. The Company did not have its own employees. Each of the Company’s executive officers was an employee or partner of an affiliate of PRCM Advisers. The Company paid PRCM Advisers a management fee equal to 1.5% per annum, calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, of the Company’s stockholders’ equity, and reimbursed it for certain expenses, as described below.
For purposes of October 28, 2009calculating the management fee, the Company’s stockholders’ equity represented the sum of the net proceeds from all issuances of the Company’s equity securities since inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus the Company’s retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods), less any amount that the Company has paid for repurchases of its common stock since inception, and subsequently amended,excluding any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income (regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income), among other certain adjustments outlined in the Management Agreement. The base management fee was subject to other adjustments from time to time, as described in the Management Agreement.
In accordance with the Management Agreement, the Company incurred $60.1 million, $47.8$31.7 million and $40.5$60.1 million as a management fee to PRCM Advisers for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, 2018 and 2017, which represents approximately 1.5%respectively.
Additionally, prior to the termination of stockholders’ equity on an annualized basis as defined by the Management Agreement. For purposes of calculatingAgreement, the management fee, stockholders’ equity is adjusted as discussed below, and to exclude the consolidated stockholders’ equity of Granite Point and its subsidiaries previously included inCompany reimbursed PRCM Advisers for (a) the Company’s consolidated balance sheetallocable share of the compensation paid by PRCM Advisers to its personnel serving as the Company’s principal financial officer and general counsel and personnel employed by PRCM Advisers as in-house legal, tax, accounting, consulting, auditing, administrative, information technology, valuation, computer programming and development and back-office resources to the Company, (b) any common stock repurchases, as well as any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income (loss), among other adjustments, inamounts for personnel of PRCM Advisers’ affiliates arising under a shared facilities and services agreement, and (c) certain costs allocated to the Company by PRCM Advisers for data services and technology. In accordance with the Management Agreement.
In connection withAgreement, expense reimbursements to PRCM Advisers were required to be made in cash on a quarterly basis following the acquisitionend of CYS, the Management Agreement was amended to (i) reduce PRCM Advisers’ base management fee with respect to the additional equity under management resulting from the merger to 0.75% from the effective time through the first anniversary of the effective time and (ii) for the fiscal quarter in which closing of the merger occurred, to make a one-time downward adjustment of Pine River’s management fees payable by Two Harbors for such quarter by $15.0 million to offset the cash consideration payable to stockholders of CYS, plus an additional downward adjustment of up to $3.3 million for certain transaction-related expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the total downward adjustment to management fees was $17.5 million.each quarter. The Company does not anticipate any further downward adjustments to management fees for transaction-related expenses.
In addition, the Company reimbursed PRCM Advisers for direct and allocated costs incurred by PRCM Advisers on behalf of the Company. These direct and allocated costs totaledCompany of approximately $27.6 million, $26.3$19.3 million and $27.9$27.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Following the termination of the Management Agreement, the Company no longer pays a management fee to, or reimburses the expenses of, PRCM Advisers. Expenses for which the Company previously reimbursed PRCM Advisers are now paid directly by the Company. The Company will continueis also now responsible for the cash compensation and employee benefits of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer and investment professionals, which were previously the responsibility of PRCM Advisers. Prior to have certain costs allocated to it by PRCM Advisers for compensation, data services, technology and certain office lease payments, however,the termination of the Management Agreement, the Company has direct relationships with most of its third party vendors and pays those expenses directly.was only responsible for the equity compensation paid to such individuals.
The Company recognized $9.2 million, $13.0 million and $11.3 million of compensation during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to restricted common stock issued to employees of PRCM Advisers and the Company’s independent directors pursuant to the Plan. See Note 18 - Equity Incentive Plan for additional information.

Note 22. Subsequent Events
Events subsequent to December 31, 20192021 were evaluated through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued and no other additional events were identified requiring further disclosure in these consolidated financial statements.

111
141


TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 23. Quarterly Financial Data - Unaudited
 2019 Quarter Ended
(in thousands, except share data)March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
Total interest income$245,483
 $261,029
 $249,740
 $238,438
Total interest expense163,525
 192,443
 191,077
 167,284
Net interest income81,958
 68,586
 58,663
 71,154
Other-than-temporary impairment losses(206) (4,848) (5,950) (3,308)
Total other (loss) income(70,176) (107,494) 297,310
 116,477
Total expenses47,550
 44,394
 47,879
 51,941
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes(10,039) 2,407
 (3,556) (2,372)
Dividends on preferred stock18,950
 18,950
 18,951
 18,950
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders$(44,885) $(109,507) $286,749
 $115,804
Basic (loss) earnings per weighted average common share$(0.18) $(0.40) $1.05
 $0.42
Diluted (loss) earnings per weighted average common share$(0.18) $(0.40) $1.00
 $0.41
 2018 Quarter Ended
(in thousands, except share data)March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31
Total interest income$194,019
 $187,360
 $236,698
 $251,955
Total interest expense96,560
 108,414
 152,396
 162,301
Net interest income97,459
 78,946
 84,302
 89,654
Other-than-temporary impairment losses(94) (174) (95) (107)
Total other income (loss)281,982
 93,174
 112,514
 (590,696)
Total expenses40,754
 38,507
 123,366
 46,705
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes3,784
 (6,051) 37,409
 6,681
Dividends on preferred stock13,747
 13,747
 18,951
 18,950
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$321,062
 $125,743
 $16,995
 $(573,485)
Basic earnings (loss) per weighted average common share$1.83
 $0.72
 $0.08
 $(2.31)
Diluted earnings (loss) per weighted average common share$1.69
 $0.68
 $0.08
 $(2.31)


142




Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
A review and evaluation was performed by our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that review and evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective as of December 31, 2019.2021. Although our CEO and CFO have determined our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in the reports we submit under the Exchange Act.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20192021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


112

143




Management’s Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021. In making this assessment the Company’s management used criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 framework).
Based on its assessment, the Company’s management believes that, as of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
The Company’s independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, have issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page 145114 of this annual report on Form 10-K.


144
113




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors
of Two Harbors Investment Corp.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Two Harbors Investment Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Two Harbors Investment Corp. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income, (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, and the related notes and our report dated February 26, 202028, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 26, 202028, 2022


114

145




Item 9B. Other Information
None.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
None.

146
115


PART III

Items 10, 11, 12 and 13.
The information required by Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Part III of this Annual Report is incorporated by reference to information to be set forth in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC, pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after December 31, 2019.2021.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
We retained Ernst & Young LLP, or EY, to audit our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020. We also retained EY, as well as other accounting and consulting firms, to provide various other services in during the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020.
The table below presents the aggregate fees billed to us for professional services performed by EY for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018:2020:
Year EndedYear Ended
December 31,December 31,
2019 201820212020
Audit fees (1)
$1,443,738
 $1,301,476
Audit fees (1)
$1,163,730 $1,704,445 
Audit-related fees (2)
46,100
 56,144
Audit-related fees (2)
46,100 46,056 
Tax fees (3)
224,726
 536,267
Tax fees (3)
278,261 303,196 
Total principal accountant fees$1,714,564
 $1,893,887
Total principal accountant fees$1,488,091 $2,053,697 
____________________
(1)
(1)Audit fees pertain to the audit of our annual Consolidated Financial Statements, including review of the interim financial statements contained in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters to underwriters in connection with our registration statements and common stock offerings, attest services, consents to the incorporation of the EY audit report in publicly filed documents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)Audit-related fees pertain to assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the principal accountant, including accounting consultations and audits in connection with proposed or consummated acquisitions, internal control reviews and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
(3)Tax fees pertain to services performed for tax compliance, including REIT compliance, tax planning and tax advice, including preparation of tax returns and claims for refund and tax-payment planning services. Tax planning and advice also includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, and tax advice related to specific transactions.

the audit of our annual Consolidated Financial Statements, including review of the interim financial statements contained in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters to underwriters in connection with our registration statements and common stock offerings, attest services, consents to the incorporation of the EY audit report in publicly filed documents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)Audit-related fees pertain to assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the principal accountant, including accounting consultations and audits in connection with proposed or consummated acquisitions, internal control reviews and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
(3)Tax fees pertain to services performed for tax compliance, including REIT compliance, tax planning and tax advice, including preparation of tax returns and claims for refund and tax-payment planning services. Tax planning and advice also includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, and tax advice related to specific transactions.

The services performed by EY in 20192021 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee in accordance with the pre-approval policy set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. This policy requires that all engagement fees and the terms and scope of all auditing and non-auditing services be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee in advance of their formal initiation.


147
116


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1)Consolidated Financial Statements:
The consolidated financial statements of the Company, together with the independent registered public accounting firm’s report thereon, are set forth in Part II, Item 8 on pages 8458 through 9366 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.
(2)Schedules to Consolidated Financial Statements:
All consolidated financial statement schedules not included have been omitted because they are either inapplicable or the information required is provided in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, included in Part II, Item 8, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3)Exhibits:
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibits Index are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.


148
117


Exhibit NumberExhibit Index
1.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Two Harbors Investment Corp., Eiger Merger Subsidiary LLC and CYS Investments, Inc., dated as of April 25, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 26, 2018).
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.63.7
3.73.8
3.83.9
3.9
3.10
4.1
4.2

149118


Exhibit NumberExhibit Index
4.3
4.4
10.1
10.2
10.34.5
10.410.1*
10.5
10.6
10.7*
10.8*10.2*
10.9*10.3*
10.4*
10.1010.5*
10.6*
10.7*
10.8
21.1
23.1
24.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101Financial statements from the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Two Harbors Investment Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (Loss), (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (filed herewith)
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101). (filed herewith)
____________________
*
*    Management or compensatory agreement


150
119


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TWO HARBORS INVESTMENT CORP.
Dated:February 26, 202028, 2022By:/s/ Thomas E. SieringWilliam Greenberg
Thomas E. Siering
William Greenberg
President,
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Director (principal executive officer)
Chief Investment Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Each of the undersigned hereby appoints Thomas E. SieringWilliam Greenberg and Mary Riskey, and each of them (with full power to act alone), as attorneys and agents for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1934, any and all amendments and exhibits to this annual report on Form 10-K and any and all applications, instruments, and other documents to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to this annual report on Form 10-K or any amendments thereto, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable.
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ William GreenbergDirector, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Investment Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 28, 2022
William Greenberg
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Thomas E. Siering
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(principal executive officer)
February 26, 2020
Thomas E. Siering
/s/ Mary Riskey
Chief Financial Officer

(principal financialPrincipal Financial and accounting officer)
Accounting Officer)
February 26, 202028, 2022
Mary Riskey
/s/ Stephen G. KasnetChairman of the Board of DirectorsFebruary 26, 202028, 2022
Stephen G. Kasnet
/s/ E. Spencer AbrahamDirectorFebruary 26, 202028, 2022
E. Spencer Abraham
/s/ James J. BenderDirectorFebruary 26, 202028, 2022
James J. Bender
/s/ Karen HammondDirectorFebruary 26, 202028, 2022
Karen Hammond
/s/ W. Reid SandersDirectorFebruary 26, 202028, 2022
W. Reid Sanders
/s/ James A. SternDirectorFebruary 26, 202028, 2022
James A. Stern
/s/ Hope B. WoodhouseDirectorFebruary 26, 202028, 2022
Hope B. Woodhouse


151
120