UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

2014

Commission File Number: 333-148546

HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(FORMERLY NSU RESOURCES INC

F/K/A BIO-CARBON SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.
INC)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA

 

20-8248213

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

305 James Street
Ottawa,

3800 Paddock Road, R.R. #5, Claremont, Ontario, Canada K1R 5M8

L1Y 1A2

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(613) 878 6552

(647) 204-6898

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Title of class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock. $0.001 par value per share

 

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes xNo o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes xNo o¨


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

o¨

Accelerated filer

o

¨

Non-accelerated filer

o¨

Smaller Reporting Company

x

(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o¨ No x

As of April 30, 201414, 2015 the Registrant had 156,311,1313,136,000 outstanding shares of Common Stock with a par value of $0.001 per share.




INDEX

HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

(FORMERLY NSU RESOURCES INC

INC)

   PAGE NONO. 

PART I

  

ITEM 1

BUSINESS

3

ITEM 1A

RISK FACTORS

4

ITEM 1B

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

8

ITEM 2

PROPERTIES

8

ITEM 3

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

8

ITEM 4

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

8 
     
ITEM 1BUSINESS

PART II

  3 

ITEM 1A5

RISK FACTORS

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

  9 

ITEM 1B6

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

  139 

ITEM 27

PROPERTIES

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

  1310 

ITEM 37A

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

  1311 

ITEM 48

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

11

ITEM 9

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

11

ITEM 9A(T)

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

11

ITEM 9B

OTHER INFORMATION

  13 
     

PART IIIII

   

ITEM 10

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

14

ITEM 11

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

15

ITEM 12

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

16

ITEM 13

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

16

ITEM 14

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

16

PART IV

 
      

ITEM 515

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

EXHIBITS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIESFINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

  14
ITEM 6SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA14
ITEM 7MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS15
ITEM 7AQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK15
ITEM 8FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA15
ITEM 9CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE16
ITEM 9A(T)CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES16
ITEM 9BOTHER INFORMATION1817 
      
PART III

SIGNATURES

  18 

 

ITEM 10DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE19
ITEM 11EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION20
ITEM 12SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS21
ITEM 13CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE21
ITEM 14PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES22
PART IV
ITEM 15EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES23
SIGNATURES24
2


PART I.

Cautionary Note

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. All statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, including statements about our business strategy, the effect of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") pronouncements, uncertainty regarding our future operating results and our profitability, anticipated sources of funds and all plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and the statements regarding future potential revenue, gross margins and our prospects for fiscal 2009. These statements appear in a number of places and can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "future," "intend," or "certain" or the negative of these terms or other variations or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy.

Actual results may vary materially from those in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors that are identified in "Item 1A.—Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this document. No assurance can be given that the risk factors described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are all of the factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from the forward-looking statements. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to (i) the "Company," the "Registrant," "NSU Resources”"Hemcare Health Services” "we," "our," “NOST,” and "us" refer to Hemcare Health Services, Inc. (formerly NSU ResourcesResrouces, Inc.


)..

Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents filed by NSU ResourcesHemcare Health Services Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") at the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. Free copies of the Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents filed by NSU Resources,Hemcare Health Services Inc. with the SEC may also be obtained from NSU Resources,Hemcare Health Services Inc. by directing a request to NSU Resources,Hemcare Health Services Inc., Attention: Dr. Luc C. Duchesne-103 Metig Street, Sault Ste Marie,John Wilkes 3800 Paddock Road, R.R. #5, Claremont, Ontario, Canada P6A 2Z5.

L1Y 1A2

ITEM 1

BUSINESS.

General

Hemcare Health Services Inc. (formerly NSU Resources Inc.Inc) (“The Company”) is a development stage companywas incorporated on January 17, 2007, under the laws of the State of Nevada. The principal offices are located at 305 James Street,3800 Paddock Road, R.R. #5, Claremont, Ontario, Canada K1R 5M8.L1Y 1A2. The telephone number is (705) 253-0339.(647) 204-6898. The Company has never declared bankruptcy, it has never been in receivership, and it has never been involved in any legal action or proceedings. Our fiscal year end is December 31.

Description of Business


The Company’s business plan and objective is to usedevelop and distribute its licensed intellectual propertyall in one daily horse feed supplement to provide serviceshorse trainers, ranches and capitalize on opportunities relating to renewable energy services, carbon trading, carbon sequestration, and other greenhouse gas emission control, offset and reduction programs worldwide.

farms.

Employees


Currently there are only two employees of the Company, whom also serve as directors of the Company; however, several other employees will be needed to implement the Company’s business plan.



Research and Development Expenditures


Since the time of our incorporation we have not incurred any research or development expenditures.

3


Business Strategy


NSU Resources, Inc. is a mineral exploration and carbon development company. Our mission is to become a vertically integrated provider

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company exited the Rare Earth Elements using carbon solutions. We are targeting growthbusiness. As part of this exit, the Company assigned the exclusive license issued from the acquisition of mineral and carbon rights worldwide.


Our strategic growth plan:

-Develop proven NI 43-101 compliant ore inventories from high quality properties with potential1776729 Ontario Corporation, a related party, for providing topside ore of good quality, have access to cost-effective energy sources, and easy access to qualified labor;
-Develop and/or secure tenure on novel cost-effective and environmentally friendly methodologies for the extraction and purification of Rare Earth Elements;
-Develop B2B relationships with users of Rare Earth Elements metals through the Company's extensive contacts in the renewable energy industry;
-Apply the Company's technologies to ore extracted from other mining complexes;
-Use cashflow from the sales of products to further develop the company's own mining projects; and,
-Create carbon neutral solutions to the mining and renewable energy supply chain.

From Q1-2012 to Q4-2013 NSU Resources, Inc will pursue expansion in the form of various acquisitions that are pertinent to its strategic vision for aggressive growth. Specific deliverables include and are not limited to:

1. The creation of a business plan for the exploitation of Rare Earth Elements from its 4,200 acres of rare earth claims in the Cobequid Fault Area of Nova Scotia, Canada. Said claims are adjacent to or in the vicinity of claims or exploration projects by other mineral exploration companies in the Cobequid Highlands. Reports of the occurrence of Rare Earth Elements have been made with the Nova Scotia Ministry of Natural Resources by exploration companies in the vicinity. Rare Earth Elements are experiencing rapidly increasing demand for use in green technologies from consumer electronics, electric and hybrid vehicles and power storage for alternative energy sources such as wind and solar. For example, the emergence of third generation solar cells with multispectral capabilities and with >40% efficiencies will create significant growth possibilities for the industry. Companies with Rare Earth Elements are re-emerging as a strategic investment opportunity. The first wave started in early 2010 when China began rationing its export of Rare Earth Elements, which led to the emergence of junior miners in the Rare Earths Elements industry.

2. The completion and proving of its technology for the extraction of rare earth minerals using a combination of methodologies that were first developed for the purification of rare chemicals from living tissues. The most exciting aspect on the discovery of Rare Earth Ore minerals in the Cobiquid fault area is the ratio between Heavy Rare Earth Ores (HREO) to the Light Rare Earth Ores (LREO). This is especially significant considering the much greater market value of HREO as compared to LREO. In almost all analyses of the closely related site of Debert Lake the ratio was near or greater than 50% (From Sears 2011). The high levels of HREO over LREO suggests that a mining venture might be economically feasible, provided the costs of ore extraction are in line with the costs of competing mines. The company plans to adapt, prove and patent its unique rare earth extraction processand carbon credit technologies to its former officer for $100, thus terminating the ores specifically foundCompany's license in the Cobequid Highlands of Nova Scotia.

3. The demonstration of carbon neutral approaches for the mining sector despite the current lackluster interest in carbon trading schemes, indicates there is still regional interest in Captechnologies. Additionally, a full and Trade, for example through the Western Climate Initiative. This will permit the Company to augment the yield from Rare Earth Element extraction projects and other mining projects.

The Companymutual release was initiated as a provider of carbon offset development solutions (accounting, measuring, reporting, verification and registration) to:
·Companies with the need to model, monitor and report their carbon footprints;
·Companies that emit greenhouse gases and are seeking cost-effective carbon offsets—see below the extensive lists of potential greenhouse gases emitters that are subjected to reporting and cap-and-trade regulations; and,
·Landowners in search of expertise to develop the carbon potential of their properties.
4

In November 2011, the Company acquired a License for a process for the extraction of rare earths elements. This approach is based on the combination of methodologies that combine plant extraction protocols and carbon neutral approaches.

In November 2010, management of the Company identified the need to pursue carbon opportunities because of international and North American markets in the carbon economy. Namely, carbon offsets are identified registered and/or traded through a number of methodologies/venues (see below) and can be either voluntary or mandated. For example, in Europe, large emitters are subjected to the European Emissions Trading System which is a result of the EU entering into the Kyoto Protocol. In North America, 7 states of the USA and 4 Canadian provinces are members of the Western Climate Initiative. Of these, regulated cap and trade systems are taking place in California and British Columbia. The Company plans to generate revenues from the exploitation of its two licenses: the Lacey Holdings which it entered into on November 4, 2010 and the 1776739 License which it entered into on January 14, 2011.
1.
The Company’s Lacey Holdings license permits us to calculate carbon offsets from the business activities of emitters, which we see as a significant consulting activity. For example, under the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), California’s large industrial entities, including refineries, cement plants, and chemical plants, must report on their emissions starting in 2012 if they emit more than 25,000 MT CO2e per year. Likewise CO2 suppliers are covered entities to the extent that they supply more than 25,000 tons of CO2 per year. Electricity suppliers and generators are also covered entities during the initial phase of the Program. All importers of electricity. Importers of electricity include both retail providers and marketers that import electricity into the WCI region.
2.
Any supplier that within the WCI region distributes transportation fuels in quantities that when combusted would emit 10,000 metric tons CO2e per year or more, in any calendar year starting in 2010.
3.
Any supplier that distributes, within the WCI region, residential, commercial, and industrial fuels in quantities that when combusted would emit 10,000 metric tons CO2e per year or more, in any calendar year starting in 2010.

The technology acquired from Lacey Holdings can be offered to various consulting clients, for example, in assessing the life cycle analysis of different biomass options for the displacement of coal: assessing the carbon footprint of wood biomass, emissions from the combustions municipal solid refuse, emissions from forested, aquatic or agricultural ecosystems or methane emission from coal beds. This technology is derived from a number of scholarly papers that have been authored or co-authoredsigned by Dr Luc C Duchesne who is a director of the Company and Director of Ontario 1776729 which is referenced in this section under a separate license agreement. The following is a selected list of scholarly papers which servedGreat Rock Development Corp. pertaining to the rare earth extraction technology use as described in the construction of the intellectual property underlying the Lacey Holdings License: 1. WETZEL, S., L. C. DUCHESNE and M. LAPORTE. 2007. Bioproducts from Canada’s forests: new partnerships in the bioeconomy. Springer. 2. ZASADA, J.C., C.W. SLAUGHTER, L.C. DUCHESNE and A.G. GORDON. 1997. Ecological considerations for the North American Boreal forest. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg Austria. Pub. No. IR-97-024. 3. LAPORTE, M.F., L. C. DUCHESNE and S. WETZEL. 2003. Effect of rainfall patternsCompany’s Form 8K filed on soil surface CO2 efflux, soil moisture, soil temperature and plant growth in a grassland ecosystem of northern Ontario, Canada: implications for climate change. Biomed Central Ecology, 2: 10-16. 4. TROFYMOW, J.A., T.R. MOORE, B. TITUS, C. PRESCOTT, I. MORRISON, M. SILTANEN, S. SMITH, J. FYLES, R. WEIN, C. CAMIRE. L.C. DUCHESNE, L. KOZAK, M. KRANANBETTER and S. VISSER. 2002. Rates of litter decomposition over six years in Canadian forests: Influence of litter quality and climate. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32: 789-804. 5. LAPORTE, M., L.C. DUCHESNE and I. K. MORRISON. 2002. Effect of clearcutting, selection cutting, shelterwood cutting and micro-sites on soil respiration in a tolerant hardwood ecosystem of northern Ontario. Forest Ecology and Management, 174: 565-575. 6. DUCHESNE, L.C. and D.W. LARSON. 1989. Cellulose and the evolution of plant life. Bioscience, 39: 238-241. 7. PRESTON, C.M., J.A. TROFYMOW and L.C. DUCHESNE. 2000. Variability in litter quality and its relationship to litter decay in Canadian forests. Canadian Journal of Botany, 78: 1269-1287. 8. DUCHESNE, L.C. and S. WETZEL. 2000. Effect of clear-cutting, prescribed burning and scarification on litter decomposition in an Eastern Ontario jack pine (Pinus banksiana) ecosystem. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 9:195-201. 9. MOORE, T.J., J. A. TROFYMOW, B. TAYLOR, C. PRESCOTT, C. CAMIRE, L.C. DUCHESNE, J. FYLES, L. KOZAK, M. KRANABETTER, I. MORRISON, M. SILTANEN, S. SMITH, B. TITUS, S. VISSER, R. WEIN and S. ZOLTAI. 1999. Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests. Global Change Biology, 5: 75-82.
5


The Lacey Holdings Licence was originally purchased from Dr. Duchesne by Lacey Holdings Inc. which is a private company owned exclusively by Mr Christopher Skinner. Mr. Wilkes, as CEO of Elemental Protective Coatings, while scoping business potential forApril 29, 2013.

On June 29, 2014 the Company identifiedwas granted the Lacey Holdings license as a business opportunity. Furthermore, as management delved into the carbon market and with the emergence of supporting cap-and-trade legislation in California, it became evident that engaging in carbon development projects also offered new business opportunities. Consequently, the Company improved its business plan and made the acquisition of the 1776729 License which permits a greater offering of services than the Lacey Holdings Inc. license. Mr. Duchesne is not a shareholder or a director of Lacey Holdings or relatedperpetual exclusive rights to the only shareholder, officer or director of Lacey Holdings Inc. There is no relationship between Lacey Holdings, the directors of the Company or its management.


Whereas the Lacey Holdings License permits to measure carbon emissions, the 1776729 License agreement permits to develop carbon offset credits for the purpose of taking advantage of recent developments showing that the regulated carbon market is emerging in North America despite the lack of support by the United States Government and the Canadian Government who refuse to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, states and provincial jurisdictions are actively engaged in Cap-and-Trade efforts through the Western Climate Initiative (WCI).

The WCI Partner jurisdictions have developed a comprehensive strategy to reduce regional GHG emissions to 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020. The figure below shows that 4 Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec) and 7 states in the USA (Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona, New Mexico, Montana, Utah) are members of the Western Climate Initiative. In addition 16 States/provinces of Canada, the USA and Mexico enjoy observer status in the Western Climate Initiative, which means they are interested but undecided as of yet.
 In Canada, British Columbia spearheads Cap-and-Trade efforts. In November 2010, British Columbia posted its Draft Protocol for Forest Carbon Sequestration from Forests making it the most advanced jurisdiction member of the WCI in Canada. British Columbia is the first Canadian province with a Cap-and-Trade legislation. In the USA, California spearheads the efforts of Cap-and-Trade under the Western Climate Initiative with numerous protocols and methodologies published under The Climate Action Reserve registry. In December 2010, California, a member of the Western Climate Initiative, legislated that carbon offsets from forests are a part of its Cap-and-Trade system. California produces roughly 1.4 percent of the worlds, and 6.2 percent of the total U.S. greenhouse gases. This has two significant consequences that create a business case for the development of carbon credits from Canadian forests:
6

1. Under the Western Climate Initiative, credits can be traded between province and member state –see insert from www.westernclimateinitiative.org/component/remository/general/program-design/Design-Summary/ page 6:

1. The WCI Cap-and-Trade Program will be composed of the individual jurisdictions’ cap-and-trade programs implemented through state and provincial regulations. Each WCI Partner jurisdiction implementing the cap-and-trade program design will issue “emission allowances” to meet its jurisdiction-specific emissions goal. The total number of available allowances serves as the “cap” on emissions. The allowances can be bought and sold (“traded”). A regional allowance market is created by the Partner jurisdictions recognizing one another’s allowances for compliance. Through this recognition, the emissions allowances issued by each jurisdiction will be usable throughout the jurisdictions for compliance purposes. We note that carbon offset vary in quality as reviewed in “FOREST CARBON OFFSETS: A Scorecard for Evaluating Project Quality” by Julie L. Beane, John M. Hagan, Andrew A. Whitman, John S. Gunn, 2008; and Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, #MCCS NCI 2008, which heightens the needs for a rigorous approach to the development of carbon offsets from forests.

Management feels that it might be difficult for California emitters to meet their regulated carbon requirements without having to purchase carbon offsets from Canada. According to the Climate Action Reserve’s projections, the projects currently under approval have just under 30 million tons of credits in the pipeline through 2014 that could be used in the California program. Yet the demand for total reduction requirements is projected to exceed 230 million tons between 2012 through 2020 in California alone. Of these, 8% are allowable from forests. The Company believes that emitters will attempt to fill the offset supply gap which will create greater demand pressure on the price point of carbon and also stimulate carbon forest sequestration projects from other jurisdictions of the WCI.

More precisely the 1776729 License provides the Company with the means to engage in carbon development as the license is based on: (1) Knowledge of and/or relationships with technology providers in various manufacturing sectors who own technologies that can be used by carbon emitters to meet emission reduction requirements; (2) Knowledge of and/or relationships with land owners in various countries with interests in providing land bases for the development of biological sequestration offset credits to meet emission reduction requirements; (3) Knowledge of and/or relationships with financial institutions with interest in providing capital for the development of carbon sequestration tools or implementation of novel technologies to meet emissions reduction requirements; and, (4) Knowledge of and/or relationships with purchasers of carbon offsets. 1776729 is a holding company which owns licensed intellectual property from GSN Dreamworks Inc., which is solely owned by our President and CEO Luc Duchesne.

The Company does not currently engage in any business activities that may provide immediate cash flow. We expect to incur expenses without generating any material revenues for the foreseeable future. We anticipate the need to raise funds to support our operations for the next 12 months. We have not identified any sources of additional funding for our continued operations, nor have we committed to a plan for funding if our current assets prove inadequate. During the next 12 months we anticipate incurring costs related to:

pursuing business opportunities to obtain engagements from clients for the use of our licensed technology;
preparing our financial statements and having them reviewed and audited; and
preparing and filing of Exchange Act reports.

We do not anticipate that we will be able to meet these costs without securing additional cash to be loaned by, or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors. Management has funded operations thus far but there is no guaranty that management will be able support operations definitely.
7


1. The creationOptimum Performance (a proprietary formulation of a business plan from the exploitation of rare earth minerals from its 4,200 acres of rare earth claims in the Cobequid Fault Area of Nova Scotia, Canada. Said claims are adjacent and in the vicinity of claims by other mineral exploration companies in the Cobequid Highlands and reports of rare earths have been made with Nova Scotia Ministry of Natural Resources by exploration companies in the vicinity. Rare Earth Metals are experiencing rapidly increasing demand for use in green technologies from consumer electronics to electric and hybrid vehicles to power storage for alternative energy sources such as wind and solar. For example the emergence of third generation solar cells with multispectral capabilities and with 40% efficiencies will create significant growth possibilitieshighly potent all-in-one daily feed supplement for the Horse industry. Companies with Rare Earth Elements (REE) are re-emerging as a strategic investment opportunity. The first wave started in early 2010 when China began rationing its export of REE, which led to the emergence of junior miners in the REE industry. The next wave of opportunity in the REE industry is predicated on companies being able to process and purify mineral deposits through the development of leading-edge extraction technologies. As such, REE companies now have to straddle mineral exploitation and R & D. With the strong and proven expertise of our management team we have positioned the company to meet this unique challenge.
2. The completion and proving of its technologyIn consideration for the extractionassignment of rare earth minerals usingthese rights, the Company will pay a combinationgross sales royalty of methodologies that were first developed for the purification of rare chemicals from living tissues. The most exciting aspect1.5% on the discovery of Rare Earth Ore minerals in the Cobiquid fault area is the ratio between Heavy Rare Earth Ores (HREO)future sales and agreed to the Light Rare Earth Ores (LREO). This is especially significant considering the much greater market value of HREO as compared to LREO. In almost all analyses of the closely related site of Debert Lake the ratio was near or greater than 50% (From Sears 2011). The high levels of HREO over LREO suggests that that a mining venture might be economically feasible, provided the costs of ore extraction are in line with the costs of competing mines. Indeed HREO are of greater commercial values than LREO.
3. The demonstration of carbon neutral approaches for the mining sector. Despite the current lack of global interest in carbon trading schemes, there exist regional interest in Cap and Trade, for example through the Western Climate Initiative. This will permit to augment the yield from rare earth extraction projects and other mining projects. We intend to create strategic alliances with technology providers for adapting various energy saving or carbon sequestration technologies to permit greater economic yields for the mining sector. When licensed such technologies and approaches will be applicable to the mining industry in general.
Investors must be aware that we have not begun significant operations and we have not generated any revenue. We currently have minimal funds available and in order to continue our business plan we must raise additional proceeds. We will likely be required to borrow proceeds from a shareholder in order to pay expenses associated with filing this report. We cannot provide any guarantee that we will be successful in securing adequate proceeds in the future and failure to do so would result in a complete loss of any investment made into the Company.

Competitive Business Conditions

Carbon trading is a commercial activity that is regulated by specific jurisdictions pursuant to regional legislation or can be voluntary. When regulated (Eg. Europe and Western Climate Initiative), governments compel polluters to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions through technological improvements or through the purchase of carbon offsets (carbon credits). It is an identified risk factor that new legislation may arise in certain jurisdictions that may render the Company’s business plan and knowledge obsolete with respect to carbon credits. With respect to the voluntary trade of carbon credits, there is a significant risk that certain voluntary purchasers of carbon credits may elect to cease the purchase of carbon credits for various reasons that are inherent to their business plans, or because of changing economic, political contexts or other conditions that cannot be controlledpre-pay royalties by the managementissuance of the Company.

Patents and Trademarks

We have no patents or trademarks.

Governmental Regulation

See “Competitive Business Conditions.”

8


120,000 Preferred Series A 12% Convertible shares to 2412151 Ontario Limited.

Reports to Security Holders


We file our quarterly and annual report with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which the public may view and copy at the Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E. Washington D.C. 20549. SEC filings, including supplemental schedule and exhibits, can also be accessed free of charge through the SEC website www.sec.gov.


ITEM 1A

RISK FACTORS

Factors Affecting Future Operating Results

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements concerning our future programs, expenses, revenue, liquidity and cash needs as well as our plans and strategies. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and we assume no obligation to update this information, except as required by applicable laws and regulations. Numerous factors could cause actual results to differ significantly from the results described in these forward-looking statements, including the following risk factors.

Because our auditors have issued a going concern opinion, there is substantial uncertainty we will continue activities in which case you could lose your investment.

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an ongoing business for the next twelve months. As such we may have to cease activities and you could lose your investment.

We currently do not have adequate funds to cover the costs associated with maintaining our status as a Reporting Company.


The Company currently has no cash available. This amount will not be enough to pay the legal, accounting, and filing fees that is required to maintain our status as a reporting company, which is currently estimated at $20,000 for fiscal year 2014.2015. If we can no longer be a reporting company our common stock would no longer be eligible for quotation on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. This would result in there being no public market for an investor to trade our common stock and any investment made would be lost in its entirety.


We lack an operating history and have losses which we expect to continue into the future. As a result, we may have to suspend or cease activities, which would result in a complete loss of any investment made into the Company.

We were incorporated on January 17, 2007 and we have not started our proposed business activities or realized any revenues. We have no operating history upon which an evaluation of our future success or failure can be made. As of December 31, 20132014 our net loss since inception is $2,418,899.$2,605,244. Based upon current plans, we expect to incur operating losses in future periods. Failure to generate revenues will cause us to suspend or cease activities.

If we are able to complete financing through the sale of additional shares of our common stock in the future, then shareholders will experience dilution.


The most likely source of future financing presently available to us is through the sale of shares of our common stock. Any sale of common stock will result in dilution of equity ownership to existing shareholders. This means that if we sell shares of our common stock, more shares will be outstanding and each existing shareholder will own a smaller percentage of the shares then outstanding. To raise additional capital we may have to issue additional shares, which may substantially dilute the interests of existing shareholders. Alternatively, we may have to borrow large sums, and assume debt obligations that require us to make substantial interest and capital payments.

9

Because there is currently a limited public trading market for our common stock, you may not be able to resell your stock.

Although our common stock is quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) the market is limited. If a market does not develop there would be no central place, such as stock exchange or electronic trading system to resell your shares.

Because our securities are subject to penny stock rules, you may have difficulty reselling your shares.

Our shares are penny stocks are covered by, and subject to, section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell the Company's securities including the delivery of a standardized disclosure document; disclosure and confirmation of quotation prices; disclosure of compensation the broker/dealer receives; and, furnishing monthly account statements. For sales of our securities, the broker/dealer must make a special suitability determination and receive from its customer a written agreement prior to making a sale. The imposition of the foregoing additional sales practices could adversely affect a shareholder's ability to dispose of his stock.

We are subject to the requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we are unable to timely comply with section 404 or if the costs related to compliance are significant, our profitability, stock price and results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.


We are required to comply with the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which require us to maintain an ongoing evaluation and integration of the internal controls of our business. We were required to document and test our internal controls and certify that we are responsible for maintaining an adequate system of internal control procedures for the year ended December 31, 2013


2014.


We evaluated our existing controls for the year ended December 31, 2013.2014. Our Chief Executive Officer identified material weaknesses, specifically a poor segregation of duties, in our internal control over financial reporting and determined that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.2014. The identified material weaknesses did not result in material audit adjustments to our 20132014 financial statements; however, uncured material weaknesses could negatively impact our financial statements for subsequent years.

In addition, a material weakness in the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting could result in an increased chance of fraud and the loss of customers, reduce our ability to obtain financing and require additional expenditures to comply with these requirements, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.


Further, we believe that the out-of-pocket costs, the diversion of management’s attention from running the day-to-day operations and operational changes caused by the need to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could be significant. If the time and costs associated with such compliance exceed our current expectations, our results of operations could be adversely affected.


There may be conflicts of interest between our management and our non-management stockholders.


Conflicts of interest create the risk that management may have an incentive to act adversely to the interests of other investors. A conflict of interest may arise between our management's personal financial interests and the fiduciary duty to our stockholders. Further, our management's own financial interests may at some point compromise their fiduciary duty to our stockholders. Luc DuchesneJohn Wilkes and Robert Williams,James Cao, who are the Company’s sole officers and a majority of its directors, continue to be involved in businesses that operate and commercialize technologies that are similar or related to the Company’s, although those businesses exploit and seek to exploit different applications and opportunities. In addition, although it is anticipated that these individuals will spend significant time and effort developing our business, it is possible that they will be exposed to business or employment opportunities that would conflict with the interests of the Company, or cause them to reduce their efforts on the Company’s behalf or to entirely cease working with the Company. If we and any other businesses with which our officers are involved wish to take advantage of the same opportunity, then the officer and director that is affiliated with both companies would abstain from voting upon the opportunity.


10


Future success is highly dependent on the ability of management to further develop and implement a business plan, and secure customers.


The nature of our operations is highly speculative and there is a consequent risk of loss of your investment. The success of our activities will depend on the availability of finances, opportunities relating to carbon trading, offset and reduction regimes, greenhouse gas emission reduction programs, government regulations and economic conditions in the forestry and timber industries. As we have no operating history or revenue and only minimal assets, there is a risk that we will be unable to consummate a business combination. The Company has had no recent operating history and no revenues or earnings from operations since inception. We have no significant assets or financial resources. We will, in all likelihood, sustain operating expenses without realizing significant revenues for the foreseeable future, at least until the market opportunities for the Company’s services and technology develops and the demand for our services becomes more proven and regular. This will likely result in our incurring net operating losses for the foreseeable future. We cannot assure that our business will develop as hoped, or that it will become profitable.


Our business may have no revenues for the foreseeable future.


We are a development stage company and have had no revenues from operations. Although the technologies offer potential, we may not realize any revenues unless and until we successfully develop a revenue stream from the use of existing licenses.



We may issue more shares to raise additional capital, and permit the development of the Company’s business.


As a result, the shareholdings of current shareholders may be diluted. Our Articles of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 275,000,000 shares of common stock. We may issue additional shares from time to time to raise the capital that we anticipate will be required to further develop our business. Any share issuance would be subject to compliance with applicable securities laws and subject to that limitation, unless our Articles of Incorporation are amended with approval of our stockholders. This may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Moreover, the common stock issued from time to time may be valued on an arbitrary or non-arm’s-length basis by our management, resulting in an additional reduction in the percentage of common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Our Board of Directors has the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval. To the extent that additional shares of common stock or preferred stock are issued, dilution to the interests of our stockholders will occur and the rights of the holders of common stock might be materially and adversely affected.


There is limited public market for our Common Stock, and we have never paid dividends on our Common Stock.


There is limited public trading market for our common stock which is listed on OTCQB: NOST and none is expected to develop until our business develops further. Additionally, we have never paid dividends on our common stock and do not presently intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that any funds available for payment of dividends will be re-invested into the Company to further its business strategy. Moreover, a significant number of unregistered securities may not become traded. Pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and any other applicable securities laws or regulations these restrictions will limit the ability of our stockholders to liquidate their investment.


Carbon trading may become obsolete.

Carbon trading is a commercial activity that is either regulated by specific jurisdictions pursuant to regional legislation, or can be voluntary. When regulated (Eg. Europe and Western Climate Initiative), governments compel polluters to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions through technological improvements or through the purchase of carbon offsets (carbon credits). It is an identified risk factor that new legislation may arise in certain jurisdictions that may render the Company’s business plan and knowledge obsolete with respect to carbon credits. With respect to the voluntary trade of carbon credits, there is a significant risk that certain voluntary purchasers of carbon credits may elect to cease the purchase of carbon credits for various reasons that are inherent to their business plans, or because of changing economic, political contexts or other conditions that cannot be controlled by the management of the Company.
11


Mineral claims may prove non commercial

Although we have acquired options to mineral rights for properties in Nova Scotia, there is a possibility that the claims do not contain ores of commercial values either because of non-economical mineral content, inability to secure financing, inability to secure permitting, inability to extract the minerals economically or any combination of these factors acting in concert.

Limited Operating History; Need for Additional Capital.


Although the Company draws on the expertise on the principals who have been operating private businesses in the renewable energy and forestry sectors, there is no pertinent historical financial information for the Company upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. Our assets and business have not yet generated substantial or recurring revenues. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources and possible cost overruns due to price and cost increases in services. We will require additional financing to cover costs that we expect to incur over the next twelve months. We believe that debt financing will not be an alternative for funding our operations as we do not have tangible assets to secure any debt financing. We anticipate that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock or other securities. However, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock to fund our plan of operations. In the absence of such financing, we will not be able to continue and our business plan will fail.


Our common stock is subject to the "penny stock" rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.


The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted certain rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are applicable to "penny stocks". For the purposes relevant to us, a “penny stock” is any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or has an exercise or conversion price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:


·

that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks;


·

the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased; and


·

that a broker or dealer provide certain detailed market information about the market for the applicable company’s securities.



In order to approve a person's account for transactions involving penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:


(1) obtain financial information, investment experience and investment objectives of the person; and

(2) make a reasonable determination that the proposed transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
12


(1)

obtain financial information, investment experience and investment objectives of the person; and

(2)

make a reasonable determination that the proposed transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:


·

sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and


·

that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.


Following a transaction, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.


Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and depress the market value of our stock.


There are additional risks of investing in penny stocks whether in public offerings or in secondary trading, relating to commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions.


TEM

ITEM 1B

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTSCOMMENTS.


None

ITEM 2

PROPERTIES.

We do not own any property; the principal offices are located at 305 James Street, Ottawa,3800 Paddock Road, R.R. #5, Claremont, Ontario, K1R 5M8.L1Y 1A2 The telephone number is (705) 253-0039.(647) 204-6898. The website is www.nsuresources.com.


ITEM 3 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

NSU Resources

Hemcare Health Services Inc. is not currently a party to any legal proceedings.

ITEM 4

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.


None

13


PART II

ITEM 5 

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Our common stock is quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) under the ticker symbol NOST. The stock trades are limited and sporadic; there is no established public trading market for our common stock.

Dividends


We did not declare or pay dividends during the Fiscal Year 2013year ended December 31, 2014 and do not anticipate declaring or paying dividends in fiscalduring the year 2014.


ended December 31, 2015.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans


There is no stock option onplan in place for the company.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities


There was no sale of unregistered securities in 2013.

during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Securities issued in 2013


None.
2014

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued a total of 120,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in exchange for a prepaid royalty.

ITEM 6

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Summary of Financial Data

  December 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
Revenues $-  $5,792 
         
Operating Expenses $4,895  $10,455 
         
Earnings (Loss) $(4,895) $(4,669)
         
Total Assets $800  $- 
         
Liabilities $79,374  $73,679 
         
Stockholders’ Deficit $(78,574) $(73,679)

14


  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

-

  

$

-

 
         

Operating Expenses

 

$

26,340

  

$

4,895

 
         

Earnings (Loss)

 

$

(186,345

)

 

$

(4,895

)

         

Total Assets

 

$

-

  

$

800

 
         

Liabilities

 

$

104,914

  

$

79,374

 
         

Stockholders’ Deficit

 

$

(104,914

)

 

$

(78,574

)


ITEM 7 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion is intended to assist in the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to the results of operations and financial condition of NSU ResourcesHemcare Health Serivces Inc. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.


2014.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and disclosures reported within those financial statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, contingencies, litigation and income taxes. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experiences and on various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results under circumstances and conditions different than those assumed could result in differences from the estimated amounts in the financial statements. There have been no material changes to these policies during fiscal 2013.

the year ended December 31, 2014.

Plan of Operations


Liquidity and Capital Resources. At the endAs of fiscal year 2013December 31, 2014 we had no cash on hand and we had liabilities of $79,374.$104,914. We must secure additional funds in order to continue our business. We were required to secure a loan to pay expenses relating to filing this report including legal, accounting and filing fees and may be required to secure additional financing to fund future filings. We believe that we will be able to obtain this loan from a current shareholder of the Company; however we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise additional proceeds or secure additional loans in the future to cover our expenses related to maintaining our reporting company status (estimated at $20,000 for fiscalthe year 2014)ending December 31, 2015). Furthermore, there is no guarantee we will receive the required financing to complete our business strategies; we cannot provide any assurance that future financing will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop or expand our operations. If we are unable to accomplish raising adequate funds then it would be likely that any investment made into the Company would be lost in its entirety.


Results of Operations. We have generated minimal revenues since inception, including $0 and $5,792Total operating expenses were $26,340 during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Additionally, we continue2014 compared to incur administrative costs related to becoming compliant with filing requirements as a public issuer. Such administrative costs totaled $4,895 and $10,455 during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Since inception we have incurred2013. The increase in expenses is from the Company incurring increased professional fees associated with catching up past due public filings.

Other Income (Expense): Other expenses totaled $160,005 during the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $0 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The other expense during the year ended December 31, 2014 was the result of the excess of prepaid royalties over value of $160,105 partially offset by other income of $100. The Company considers this to be a loss of $2,418,999 of which $2,127,000 is attributable to impairment losses on assets acquired for common stock.


one-time event.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. None

Contractual Obligations. None


ITEM 7A

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We do not currently hold any market risk sensitive instruments entered into for hedging transaction risks related to foreign currencies. In addition, we have not entered into any transactions with derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.


ITEM 8 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Our financial statements appear beginning on page F-1, immediately following the signature page of this report.

15


ITEM 9 

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None

ITEM 9A(T)

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures


Management of NSU ResourcesHemcare Health Services Inc. is responsible for maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures must ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial and other required disclosures.


At the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, Luc C. Duchesne.Officer. Based on his evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, he concluded that during the period covered by this report, such disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP standards. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting that adversely affected our disclosure controls and that may be considered to be “material weaknesses.”


The Company will continue to create and refine a structure in which critical accounting policies and estimates are identified, and together with other complex areas, are subject to multiple reviews by accounting personnel. In addition, the Company will enhance and test our year-end financial close process. Additionally, the Company’s management will increase its review of our disclosure controls and procedures. Finally, we plan to designate individuals responsible for identifying reportable developments. We believe these actions will remediate the material weakness by focusing additional attention and resources in our internal accounting functions. However, the material weakness will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.



Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements; (iii) provide reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of company assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and (iv) provide reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of company assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because changes in conditions may occur or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

16


Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.2014. This assessment is based on the criteria for effective internal control described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132014 was not effective in the specific areas described in the “Disclosure Controls and Procedures” section above and as specifically described in the paragraphs below.


As of December 31, 20132014 the Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer identified the following specific material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes:


• Policies and Procedures for the Financial Close and Reporting Process — Currently there are no policies or procedures that clearly define the roles in the financial close and reporting process. The various roles and responsibilities related to this process should be defined, documented, updated and communicated. Failure to have such policies and procedures in place amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.

• Representative with Financial Expertise — For the year ending December 31, 2013, the Company did not have a representative with the requisite knowledge and expertise to review the financial statements and disclosures at a sufficient level to monitor the financial statements and disclosures of the Company. Failure to have a representative with such knowledge and expertise amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.

• Adequacy of Accounting Systems at Meeting Company Needs — The accounting system in place at the time of the assessment lacks the ability to provide high quality financial statements from within the system, and there were no procedures in place or built into the system to ensure that all relevant information is secure, identified, captured, processed, and reported within the accounting system. Failure to have an adequate accounting system with procedures to ensure the information is secure and accurately recorded and reported amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.

• Segregation of Duties — Management has identified a significant general lack of definition and segregation of duties throughout the financial reporting processes. Due to the pervasive nature of this issue, the lack of adequate definition and segregation of duties amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.

·

Policies and Procedures for the Financial Close and Reporting Process — Currently there are no policies or procedures that clearly define the roles in the financial close and reporting process. The various roles and responsibilities related to this process should be defined, documented, updated and communicated. Failure to have such policies and procedures in place amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.

·

Representative with Financial Expertise — For the year ending December 31, 2014, the Company did not have a representative with the requisite knowledge and expertise to review the financial statements and disclosures at a sufficient level to monitor the financial statements and disclosures of the Company. Failure to have a representative with such knowledge and expertise amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.

·

Adequacy of Accounting Systems at Meeting Company Needs — The accounting system in place at the time of the assessment lacks the ability to provide high quality financial statements from within the system, and there were no procedures in place or built into the system to ensure that all relevant information is secure, identified, captured, processed, and reported within the accounting system. Failure to have an adequate accounting system with procedures to ensure the information is secure and accurately recorded and reported amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.

·

Segregation of Duties — Management has identified a significant general lack of definition and segregation of duties throughout the financial reporting processes. Due to the pervasive nature of this issue, the lack of adequate definition and segregation of duties amounts to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.

In light of the foregoing, once we have the adequate funds, management plans to develop the following additional procedures to help address these material weaknesses:


• NSU Resources Inc. will create and refine a structure in which critical accounting policies and estimates are identified, and together with other complex areas, are subject to multiple reviews by accounting personnel. In addition, we plan to enhance and test our month-end and year-end financial close process. Additionally, our audit committee will increase its review of our disclosure controls and procedures. We also intend to develop and implement policies and procedures for the financial close and reporting process, such as identifying the roles, responsibilities, methodologies, and review/approval process. We believe these actions will remediate the material weaknesses by focusing additional attention and resources in our internal accounting functions. However, the material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.
17


·

The Company will create and refine a structure in which critical accounting policies and estimates are identified, and together with other complex areas, are subject to multiple reviews by accounting personnel. In addition, we plan to enhance and test our month-end and year-end financial close process. Additionally, our audit committee will increase its review of our disclosure controls and procedures. We also intend to develop and implement policies and procedures for the financial close and reporting process, such as identifying the roles, responsibilities, methodologies, and review/approval process. We believe these actions will remediate the material weaknesses by focusing additional attention and resources in our internal accounting functions. However, the material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.


This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.


This report shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.


Changes in Internal Controls


There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fiscal year ended December 31, 20132014 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B

OTHER INFORMATION.


None.


18


PART III

ITEM 10

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

NSU Resources Inc.’s

The Company’s executive officers and directors and their respective age as of December 31, 20132014 are as follows:


Directors:

Name of Director

Age

Luc C. Duchesne

James Cao

52

51

Robert Williams

John Wilkes

50

53

Executive Officer:

Name of Officer

Age

Office

Luc C. Duchesne

James Cao

52

51

President CFO,and CEO

Robert Williams

John Wilkes

50

53

Chief TechnologyFinancial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

The term of office for each director is one year, or until the next annual meeting of the shareholders.


Biographical Information

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our officers and director for the past year.

Luc Duchesne (52),

James Cao

Mr. James Cao, (51) Has 20+ years of experience operating business enterprises, including business to business and business to consumer activities.

Mr. Cao has owned and operated CAO Real Estate, a Commercial and Residential Real Estate Brokerage Firm since 2004. Duties include hiring, training and managing sales associates as well as managing company production and establishing company guidelines and policy and holds a Florida Real Estate Brokers license.

Prior to founding his real estate company, Mr. Cao was President/C.E.O of American Dreamhome Funding, Inc. from 2002 to 2008. American Dreamhome Funding was a successful mortgage brokerage company serving CitiCorp, Wachovia, Countrywide Funding, AmNet Mortgage, Bank of America, Wells Fargo Bank, SunTrust Bank and World Savings. During this time he led a sales force in Florida and Georgia, growing annual sales to $54 million. 

From 1999 to 2000 Mr. Cao was the Chief Operating Officer of Netoy Corp. Netoy was a publically traded e-commerce toy company with a $250 million market cap. He was responsible for the past five years, has been Presidentrecruiting, hiring, and CEO of Forest BioProducts Inc, a consulting firm in forestry dealingsuccessfully expanding their sales force. Mr. Cao negotiated with resource development. Forest BioProducts is owned in majority by Grid Cloud Solutions, Inc. (OTC Pinksheets: GRDC) a publicly trading technology and consulting company in the renewable energy sector, where Mr. Duchesne holds the positions of Director and Chief Technology Officer. He has also been president and CEO of SITTM Technologies Inc, a private biodiesel technology and brokerage firm until February 17, 2011 when it was acquired by MSE Envirotech Corp (OTC Pinksheets: MEVT); and of GSN Dreamworks Inc. (a related party), a private research and development firm involved in opportunities relating to carbon stocks and natural resources.


From 2004 to 2006 Mr. Duchesne was fully engaged in forestry consulting, acting as CEO of Forest BioProducts, providing various services to clients seeking economic opportunities from the exploitation of non-timber values from forest ecosystemscompanies such as bioenergy, biomass, pharmaceuticalsIBM, EMC, Oracle and nutraceuticals. These activities were reducedSprint which allowed them to 20%implement logistical software and hardware to accommodate increased e-commerce traffic.


John Wilkes

Mr. Wilkes, M.B.A., C.P.A., C.A. (53) earned his C.A. designation with Price Waterhouse in Toronto, Canada. Upon obtaining his designation he worked privately for a brief period of time before joining Coopers & Lybrand in Toronto, Canada. While there Mr. Wilkes focused on insolvency and Mergers and Acquisitions. In the early ‘90’s Mr. Wilkes joined a junior investment bank called Pagun Corporation where he spent most of his time when he tookevaluating environmental technologies. Since 2005, Mr. Wilkes has been an Independent Investment Management Professional, making private investments in both private and public companies that, for the position of CEO of SITTM Technologies Inc, in 2006. SITTM Technologies Inc. is a privately owned corporation involvedmost part, have their core business in the manufacturing and sales of biodiesel and value added products from fatty acid methyl esters. This took up 60% of his time. He was president of GSN Dreamworks from 2006 continuing until June 2010 when he became CEO of BioCarbon Systems International. From June 2010 to December 2010 he was CEO and director of Bio-Carbon Systems International Inc. He is currently engaged in the full time management of the Company with an effort of at least 40 hours per week.

19


Mr. Duchesne holds a PhD in plant biochemistry from the University of Guelph, a M.Sc. in Forest Sciences from the University of Toronto (1985) and a B.Sc. in Forest Engineering from Laval University (1983). He has authored or co-authored 85 peer-reviewed scientific articles, book chapters or books. He has developed algorithms and other knowledge relating to carbon stocks and the assessment of the amount of carbon stock found in various natural ecosystems. That intellectual property can be used to validate carbon stocks in the context of carbon trading regimes. Mr. Duchesne was appointed as a director of the Company in large part because of his academic training with respect to forestry matters, his training and experience in the forestry sector, his prior experience as an entrepreneur, and his specific knowledge and understanding of the intellectual property to be exploited by the Company and the business opportunities in which that technology could be applied. Mr. Duchesne anticipates that over the next six months he will devote approximately 160 hours per month to the business of the Company.

Robert Williams (50) received his degree in Chemistry from Acadia University in Nova Scotia (1984) and his Ph.D. from the University of Guelph (1989). Throughout his career he has been involved in the development of projects involving multidisciplinary groups in the research and isolation of materials. Dr. Williams is an expert in research and development and has extensive contacts throughout a variety of industries and brings his unbridled optimism to this project. 
environmental space.

Significant Employees


We do not employ any non-officers who are expected to make a significant contribution to its business.


Corporate Governance


Nominating Committee. We have not established a Nominating Committee because of our limited operations; and because we have only two directors and one officer, we believe that we are able to effectively manage the issues normally considered by a Nominating Committee.


Audit Committee. We have has not established an Audit Committee because of our limited operations; and because we have only two directors and one officer, we believe that we are able to effectively manage the issues normally considered by a Audit Committee.

Code of Ethics. We have not adopted a Code of Ethics for our principal executive and financial officers.

ITEM 11

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and
principal position
 
Fiscal
Year
 Salary  Bonus  Other annual compensation  
Restricted stock
award (s)
  
Securities underlying
options/ SARs
  
LTIP
payouts
  
All other
compensation
 
                               
Luc C. Duchesne
Director, President
 2013  0   0   0   0   0   0   0 

Name and principal position

 

Fiscal

Year

 Salary  Bonus  Other annual compensation  Restricted stock award(s)  Securities underlying options/ SARs  LTIP payouts  All other compensation 
                               

John Wilkes

                              

Chief Financial Officer

 

2014

  

0

   

0

   

0

   

0

   

0

   

0

   

0

 
                               

James Cao

                              

Chief Executive Officer

 

2014

  

0

   

0

   

0

   

0

   

0

   

0

   

0

 

There has been no cash payment paid to the individuals above for services rendered in all capacities to us for the periodyear ended December 31, 2013.2014. There has been no compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the executive officer by any person for services rendered in all capacities to us for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2013.2014. No compensation is anticipated within the next six months to any officer or director of the Company.

Stock Option Grants

We did not grant any stock options to the executive officer during the most recent fiscal periodyear ended December 31, 2013.

20

2014.


ITEM 12

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.


The following table provides the names and addresses of each person known to NSU Resources Inc.the Company to own more than 5% of the outstanding common stock as of December 31, 20132014 and by the officers and directors, individually and as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2013, the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned of record by executive officers, directors and persons who hold 5% or more of the outstanding common stock of the Company.
Beneficial Owner 
Amount of
Stock Owned
  % Ownership 
       
Matthew Sacco 
2173 Rochester Circle
Oakville, Ontario
L6M 5E3 Canada
  83,300,000   53.3%
         
Luc C Duchesne 
132 Leo Avenue
Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
P6A 3V7 Canada
  24,000,000(1)   15.0%
         
Others   49,011,131   31.7%
         
Total issued   156,311,131   100%
____________
(1) Shares registered to 1776729 Ontario Corporation a company controlled by Dr. Duchesne, his wife and his son.

Beneficial Owner

 Amount of Stock Owned  % Ownership 

Matthew Sacco

 

1,666,000

  

53.1

%

2173 Rochester Circle

        

Oakville, Ontario

        

L6M 5E3 Canada

        
        

Others

  

1,470,000

   

46.9

%

        

Total issued

  

3,136,000

   

100

%

ITEM 13

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.


On April 19, 2012,

During the Company sold its gold rights from the Byers Brook and Shatter Lake claims of Nova Scotia for 75,000,000 restricted shares of Great Rock Development Corporation, a corporation where Dr. Luc Duchesne also acts as director. The shares of Great Rock Development Corporation were not received and the asset written down to zero as a result. Additionally, the Company entered into an agreement on April 22, 2013 to sell certain mineral rights to Great Rock Development Corporation in exchange for 2,000,000 restricted common shares. Great Rock Development Corporation is a publicly traded corporation with an address at 500 Gran Street, Sault Ste Marie, ON. Dr. Duchesne abstained to vote as director of both corporations. Dr. Duchesne’s interest in Great Rock Development Corporation is less than 1% of all outstanding shares of Great Rock Development Corporation.

21

During Fiscal Years 2013 and 2012,years ended December 31, 2014, there were no other material transactions between the Company and any Officer, Director or related party that has not been disclosed in footnote 5 to the financial statements. Additionally, there are no Officers, Directors or other related parties that since the date of incorporation, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction with us or in any presently proposed transaction that has or will materially affect us:

-

·

The Officers and Directors;

-

·

Any person proposed as a nominee for election as a director;

-

·

Any other person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to the outstanding shares of common stock;

-

·

Any relative or spouse of any of the foregoing persons who have the same house as such person.


Any future transactions between us and our Officers, Directors, and Affiliates will be on terms no less favorable to us than can be obtained from unaffiliated third parties. Such transactions with such persons will be subject to approval of our Board of Directors.


ITEM 14

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.


During the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the Company incurred auditing expenses of approximately $2,500$16,125 and $3,700 which includes bookkeeping and auditing services.$2,500. There were no other audit related services or tax fees incurred.

22



PART IV

ITEM 15

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.


(a)

The following documents have been filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


1.

Financial Statements


  

Page

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

F-1

 

Balance Sheets

  

F-2

 

Statements of Operations

  

F-3

 

Statements of Stockholders' Deficit

  

F-4

 

Statements of Cash Flows

  

F-5

 

Notes to Financial Statements

  F-6 - F-11

F-6-12

 

2.

Financial Statement Schedules.

All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required or because the required information is included in the Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.

3.

Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report:

EXHIBIT

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

3.1

31.1

Articles of Incorporation
3.2By-Laws
23.1Consent of Accountant
31.1

8650 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

31.2

8650 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

32.1

4700 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

101.INS **

 

XBRL Instance Document

   

101.SCH **

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

   

101.CAL **

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

   

101.DEF **

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

   

101.LAB **

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

   

101.PRE **

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

__________
** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
23


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

By:

/s/ James Cao

 NSU RESOURCES INC

By:

/s/ John Wilkes

James Cao

 

John Wilkes

President and Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial Officer)

  

April 14, 2015

April 14, 2015

 
Date: May 12, 2014
By:
/s/ Luc C. Duchesne
Luc C. Duchesne
President
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Accounting Officer
Secretary, Director
24





NSU RESOURCES

HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(Formerly Bio-Carbon Solutions International,NSU Resources Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Financial Statements

December 31, 20132014 and 2012








25

NSU RESOURCES INC.
(Formerly Bio-Carbon Solutions International, Inc.)
(A Development Stage Company)

Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012

CONTENTS

  

Page(s)

 

Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm

  F-1

F-2

 
     

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013

  F-2

F-3

 
     

Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012 and the period of January 17, 2007 (Inception) to December 31, 2013 (unaudited)

  F-3

F-4

 
     

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) Cumulative toDeficit for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)

  F-4

F-5

 
     
Statement

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012 and the period of January 17, 2007 (Inception) to December 31, 2013 (unaudited)

  F-5

F-6

 
     

Notes to the Financial Statements

  F-6 - F-11

F-7

 

26

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED


PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C.

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ACCOUNTANTS

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

1466 N. HIGHWAY 89 STE. 230

FARMINGTON, UTAH 84025

________________

(801) 447-9572 FAX (801) 447-9578


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Hemcare Health Services Inc. (Formerly NSU Resources Inc.

Ontario, Canada


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hemcare Health Services Inc. (Formerly NSU Resources Inc.) as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hemcare Health Services Inc. (Formerly NSU Resources Inc.) as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note (2) to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses and has a net capital deficiency. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note (2). The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.



/s/ Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C.

Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C.

Salt Lake City,

Farmington, Utah 84111

March 27, 2014
F-1

84025 

April 9, 2015


HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(formerly NSU RESOURCES, INC.)

(Formerly BIO-CARBON SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.)
(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

 December 31, 
 2013 2012 
ASSETS 
Current assets      
Prepaid expenses $800  $- 
Total current assets  800   - 
         
Total assets $800  $- 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT 
         
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $60,160  $57,795 
Related party payables  19,214   15,884 
Total current liabilities  79,374   73,679 
         
Stockholders' deficit        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 275,000,000 shares authorized; 156,311,131 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012  156,311   156,311 
Additional paid in capital  2,183,990   2,183,990 
Other comprehensive income  24   24 
Deficit accumulated during the development stage  (2,418,899)  (2,414,004)
Total stockholders' deficit  (78,574)  (73,679)
         
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $800  $- 

 December 31, 
 

2014

 

2013

 

ASSETS

 

Current assets

      

Prepaid expenses

 

$

-

  

$

800

 

Total current assets

  

-

   

800

 
         

Total assets

 

$

-

  

$

800

 
         

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 

Current liabilities

        

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

67,665

  

$

60,160

 

Related party payables

  

37,249

   

19,214

 

Total current liabilities

  

104,914

   

79,374

 
         

Stockholders' deficit

        

Series A convertible preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, 120,000 and shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013

  

120,000

   

-

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 275,000,000 shares authorized; 3,136,000 issued; 2,756,000 and 3,136,000 outstanding at and December 31, 2014 and 2013

  

3,136

   

3,136

 

Additional paid in capital

  

2,377,270

   

2,337,165

 

Other comprehensive income

  

24

   

24

 

Treasury stock, 380,000 shares

  

(100

)

  

-

 

Accumulated deficit

  

(2,605,244

)

  

(2,418,899

)

Total stockholders' deficit

  

(104,914

)

  

(78,574

)

         

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit

 

$

-

  

$

800

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-2


HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(formerly NSU RESOURCES, INC.)

(Formerly BIO-CARBON SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.)
(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

  
Year ended
December 31,
  
For the period from January 17, 2007 (inception) to
December 31,
 
  2013  2012  2013 
        (Unaudited) 
             
Revenue $-  $5,792  $5,792 
             
Operating expenses            
General and administrative  -   4,571   10,570 
Officer compensation  -   -   159,006 
Professional fees  4,895   5,884   128,116 
Total operating expenses  4,895   10,455   297,692 
             
Other income (expense)            
Other income  -   -   41 
Interest expense  -   (6)  (40)
Impairment loss  -   -   (2,127,000)
Total other income (expense)  -   (6)  (2,126,999)
             
Net loss applicable to common shareholders $(4,895) $(4,669) $(2,418,899)
             
Other comprehensive loss            
Foreign currency translation adjustment  -   -   24 
Total comprehensive loss $(4,895) $(4,669) $(2,418,875)
             
Basic and diluted loss per common share $(0.00) $(0.00)    
             
Weighted average shares outstanding  156,311,131   156,118,505     

  Year ended December 31, 
  

2014

  

2013

 
         

Revenue

 

$

-

  

$

-

 
         

Operating expenses

        

Professional fees

  

26,340

   

4,895

 

Total operating expenses

  

26,340

   

4,895

 
         

Other income (expense)

        

Other income

  

100

   

-

 

Excess cost of prepaid royalties over value

  

(160,105

)

  

-

 

Total other income (expense)

  

(160,005

)

  

-

 
         

Net loss

 

$

(186,345

)

 

$

(4,895

)

         

Basic and diluted loss per common share

 

$

(0.00

)

 

$

(0.00

)

         

Weighted average shares outstanding

  

2,932,578

   

3,136,000

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-3


HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(formerly NSU RESOURCES, INC.)

(Formerly BIO-CARBON SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.)
(A Development Stage Company)

Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

Results of operations for the period of January 17, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2011 are unauditedDeficit

  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  
 Additional
Paid-in
   Other comprehensive income   Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital   (loss)  Deficit  Total 
Beginning balance  -  $-   -  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Common stock issued for cash  -   -   5,555,556   5,556   (556)  -   -   5,000 
Donated capital  -   -   -   -   200   -   -   200 
Common stock issued for cash  -   -   700,000   700   30,800   -   -   31,500 
Net loss, period ended December 31, 2007  -   -   -   -   -   -   (7,507)  (7,507)
Balance, December 31, 2007  -   -   6,255,556   6,256   30,444   -   (7,507)  29,193 
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2008  -   -   -   -   -   -   (29,160)  (29,160)
Balance, December 31, 2008  -   -   6,255,556   6,256   30,444   -   (36,667)  33 
                                 
Donated capital  -   -   -   -   100   -   -   100 
Repurchase of company stock and cancellation  -   -   (4,777,778)  (4,778)  4,578   -   -   (200)
Donated capital  -   -   -   -   9,710   -   -   9,710 
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2009  -   -   -   -   -   -   (24,036)  (24,036)
Balance, December 31, 2009  -   -   1,477,778   1,478   44,832   -   (60,703)  (14,393)
                                 
Common stock issued for intangible asset  -   -   23,333,333   23,333   2,076,667   -   -   2,100,000 
Foreign currency translation  -   -   -   -   -   (411)  -   (411)
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2010  -   -   -   -   -   -   (2,264,478)  (2,264,478)
Balance, December 31, 2010  -   -   24,811,111   24,811   2,121,499   (411)  (2,325,181)  (179,282)
                                 
Common stock issued for prepaid expense  -   -   24,000,000   24,000   (7,000)  -   -   17,000 
Common stock issued for settlement of debt  -   -   6,000,000   6,000   140,991   -   -   146,991 
Common stock issued for land purchase  -   -   100,000,000   100,000   (90,000)  -   -   10,000 
Foreign currency translation  -   -   -   -   -   435   -   435 
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2011  -   -   -   -   -   -   (84,154)  (84,154)
Balance, December 31, 2011  -   -   154,811,111   154,811   2,165,490   24   (2,409,335)  (89,010)
                                 
Common stock issued for settlement of wages payable  -   -   1,500,020   1,500   18,500   -   -   20,000 
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2012  -   -   -   -   -   -   (4,669)  (4,669)
Balance, December 31, 2012  -   -   156,311,131   156,311   2,183,990   24   (2,414,004)  (73,679)
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2013  -   -   -   -   -   -   (4,895)  (4,895)
Balance, December 31, 2013  -  $-   156,311,131  $156,311  $2,183,990  $24  $(2,418,899) $(78,574)

  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Additional Paid-in  Other comprehensive  Treasury  Accumulated   
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital   income   Stock  Deficit  Total 
                                     

Balance, December 31, 2012

  

-

  

$

-

   

3,136,000

  

$

3,136

  

$

2,337,165

  

$

24

  

$

-

  

$

(2,414,004

)

 

$

(73,679

)

                                     

Net loss, year ended December 31, 2013

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

(4,895

)

  

(4,895

)

Balance, December 31, 2013

  

-

   

-

   

3,136,000

   

3,136

   

2,337,165

   

24

   

-

   

(2,418,899

)

  

(78,574

)

                                     

Preferred shares issued for prepayment of royalty

  

120,000

   

120,000

   

-

   

-

   

40,105

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

160,105

 

Treasury stock exchanged for asset

  

-

   

-

   

(380,000

)

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

(100

)

  

-

   

(100

)

Net loss, year ended December 31, 2014

  

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

-

   

(186,345

)

  

(186,345

)

Balance, December 31, 2014

  

120,000

  

$

120,000

   

2,756,000

  

$

3,136

  

$

2,377,270

  

$

24

  

$

(100

)

 

$

(2,605,244

)

 

$

(104,914

)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-4


HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(formerly NSU RESOURCES, INC.)

(Formerly BIO-CARBON SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.)
(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

  
Year ended
December 31,
  
For the period from January 17, 2007 (inception) to
December 31,
 
  2013  2012  2013 
     (Unaudited)  (Unaudited) 
Cash flows from operating activities         
Net income (loss) $(4,895) $(4,669) $(2,418,899)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities            
Impairment loss  -   -   2,127,000 
Common stock issued for services  -   -   140,000 
Prepaid expense  (800)  -   (800)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities            
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  2,365   (6,898)  85,141 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (3,330)  (11,567)  (67,558)
             
Net cash used in investing activities  -   -   - 
             
Cash flows from financing activities            
Proceeds from related party loans  3,330   17,359   27,016 
Repayments of related party loans  -   (5,792)  (5,792)
Contributed capital  -   -   10,010 
Proceeds from sale of stock  -   -   36,500 
Payment on cancelled shares  -   -   (200)
Net cash provided by financing activities  3,330   11,567   67,534 
             
Effect of exchange rate on cash  -   -   24 
             
(Decrease) increase in cash  -   -   - 
Cash at beginning of period  -   -   - 
Cash at end of period $-  $-  $- 
             
Non-Cash Investing Activities            
Common stock issued for settlement of related party loan and wages payable $-  $20,000  $166,991 
Common stock issued for prepaid expense $-  $-  $17,000 
Common stock issued for purchase of intangible asset $-  $-  $2,100,000 
Common stock issued for asset acquisition $-  $-  $10,000 

  Year ended December 31, 
  

2014

  

2013

 

Cash flows from operating activities

      

Net loss from operations

 

$

(186,345

)

 

$

(4,895

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities

     

Impairment loss included in loss from discontinued operations

  

-

   

-

 

Excess cost of prepaid royalties over value

  

160,105

   

-

 

Gain on sale of intangible asset for treasury stock

  

(100

)

  

-

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

        

Prepaid expenses

  

800

   

(800

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  

7,505

   

2,365

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  

(18,035

)

  

(3,330

)

         

Net cash used in investing activities

  

-

   

-

 
         

Cash flows from financing activities

        

Proceeds from related party loans

  

18,035

   

3,330

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

  

18,035

   

3,330

 
         

Net change in cash

  

-

   

-

 

Cash at beginning of period

  

-

   

-

 

Cash at end of period

 

$

-

  

$

-

 
         

Supplemental cash flow information

        

Cash paid for interest

 

$

-

  

$

-

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

$

-

  

$

-

 
         

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities

        

Preferred stock issued for prepaid royalties

 

$

120,000

  

$

-

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-5


NSU RESOURCES INC


HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(Formerly Bio-carbon Solutions International,NSU Resources, Inc.)

 (A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 20132014 and 2012

Results of operations for the period of January 17, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2011 are unaudited

2013

Note 1 - Nature of Business


The Company was organized January 17, 2007 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada, as DBL Senior Care, Inc. The Company subsequently changed its name on December 11, 2009 to Elemental Protective Coatings Corp, subsequently changed its name on January 27, 2011 to Bio-Carbon Solutions International, Inc., and more recentlythen to NSU Resources Inc on October 31, 2011.2011 and more recently to HemCare Health Services Inc. on March 2, 2015. The Company provides specialized advisoryproduces and value chain management services to those wishing to participate in the carbon development market, especially in the mining sector. The Company has limited operations and in accordance with FASB ASC 915-10, "Development Stage Entities," the Company is considereddistributes a development stage company.


line of all-in-one horse feed supplement.

The former business of the Company was to provide personal care services to elderly, physically disabled or other home-bound individuals suffering infirmity. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the board of directors changed the Company's focus toward the manufacture and sale of fire retardant products. Currently, theThe Company focuses onthen changed its focus to the licensing of certain technologies related to rare earth minerals mining.


Currently, the Company has the exclusive rights to the use of Optimum Performance (a proprietary formulation of a highly potent all-in-one daily feed supplement for the Horse industry.

Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash

For the Statements of Cash Flows, all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 20132014 or 2012.

2013.

Income taxes

Income taxes are provided for using the liability method of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740 (formally SFAS No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”). A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effect of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

F-6

NSU RESOURCES INC
(Formerly Bio-carbon Solutions International, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
Results of operations for the period of January 17, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2011 are unaudited

Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Revenue Recognition


Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, goods are delivered or services performed and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company generateddid not generate any revenues of $0 and $5,792 during the years ended December 31, 20132014 or 2013.


HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(Formerly NSU Resources, Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2014 and 2012.


2013

Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Share Based Expenses

The Company complies with FASB ASC Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation, which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that is based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. FASB ASC Topic 718 primarily focuses on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. This statement requires a public entity to expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments. This statement also provides guidance on valuing and expensing these awards, as well as disclosure requirements of these equity arrangements. The Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 718 upon formation of the Company and expenses share based costs in the period incurred.


Going concern


The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern. This contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. Currently, the Company has no cash, and no material assets, accumulated losses of $2,605,244, a working capital deficit of $104,914, nor does it have operations or a source of revenue sufficient to cover its operation costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The Company will be dependent upon the raising of additional capital through placement of our common stock in order to implement its business plan, or merge with an operating company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in either situation in order to continue as a going concern. The officers and directors have committed to advancing certain operating costs of the Company.


F-7

NSU RESOURCES INC
(Formerly Bio-carbon Solutions International, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
Results of operations for the period of January 17, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2011 are unaudited

Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Valuation of Investments in Securities and Securities at fair value – Definition and Hierarchy


FASB ASC 820-10-15 defines fair value, thereby eliminating inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements, and increases disclosures surrounding fair value calculations. FASB ASC 820-10-15 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of inputs are defined as follows:


Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by the Company at the measurement date.

Level 2 – inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those inputs classified as Level 1

Level 3 – inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation


The Company has no assets or liabilities that are required to be carried at fair value. Accounts payable and related party payables have fair values that approximate the carrying value due to the short term nature of these instruments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On June 10, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued update ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915). Amongst other things, the amendments in this update removed the definition of development stage entity from Topic 915, thereby removing the distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from US GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information on the statements of income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity; (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2014 and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, however entities are permitted to early adopt for any annual or interim reporting period for which the financial statements have yet to be issued. The Company has reviewed recently updatedelected to early adopt these amendments and accordingly have not labeled the financial statements as those of a development stage entity and have not presented inception-to-date information on the respective financial statements.

In August 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-15 Preparation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Under generally accepted accounting standardsprinciples (GAAP), continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity’s liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting in orderaccordance with Subtopic 205-30, Presentation of Financial Statements—Liquidation Basis of Accounting. Even when an entity’s liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in this Update should be followed to determine their effects, if any, on its results of operations,whether to disclose information about the relevant conditions and events. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company will evaluate the going concern considerations in this ASU, however, at the current period, management does not believe that it has met conditions which would subject these financial position or cash flows. Based on that review, the Company believes that none of these standards will have a significant effect on its consolidated financial statements.


statements for additional disclosure.


HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(Formerly NSU Resources, Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2014 and 2013

Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Net loss per common share

Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260 (formerly SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share). The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period is used to compute basic loss per share. Diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding. Dilutive potential common shares are additional common shares assumed to be exercised. Basic net loss per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods presented. The Comopany asCompany has no common stock equivalents as of December 31, 2014 or 2013, or 2012, respectively.


F-8

NSU RESOURCES INC
(Formerly Bio-carbon Solutions International, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
Results of operations for the period of January 17, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2011 are unaudited

Note 3 - Stockholders’ Equity

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

As discussed in the 8K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2014, during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to designate the previously authorized series A preferred stock to series A convertible preferred stock. The preferred series A 12% convertible shares have a par value of $1, entitle holder to one vote and accrued dividends at 12% per year, paid quarterly. At the option of the holder, the stock can be converted into shares of the Company's common stock. The number of shares to be issued will be determined by dividing the amount of the Series A shares being converted by $0.001.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 120,000 shares of series A convertible preferred stock in exchange for a prepayment of royalties to a related party totaling $120,000. There were 120,000 and -0- shares of series A convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Common stock


Stock

The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 275,000,000 shares withand carries a par value of $0.001. The authorized preferred stock of the Company consists of 5,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001.


Share Issuances

On July 7, 2009, the Board of Directors authorized and a majority of the stockholders of the Company ratified a forward stock split on a ten-for-one basis, resulting in a total of ten post-split shares for each pre-split share that was outstanding as of July 24, 2009. All references to share and per share information in the financial statements and related notes have been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.

On January 17, 2007, the Company issued 5,555,556 shares of its par value common stock as founders' shares to two officers and directors in exchange for a subscription receivable in the amount of $5,000. The subscription receivable was satisfied on February 2, 2007, with a cash payment of $5,000.

On August 6, 2007, the Company issued an aggregate of 700,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for total cash of $31,500 in a private placement pursuant to Regulation D, Rule 505, of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

On November 19, 2009, the Company repurchased and cancelled 4,777,778 shares of its common stock from two of its founding shareholders.

On November 8, 2010, the Company issued 23,333,333 shares of its common stock to purchase software technology valued at $2,100,000.

During the year endingended December 31, 2011,2014, the Company issued a total of 6,000,000bought back 380,000 post-split shares of its common stock in settlement of wages and loans payable to itsinto treasury from a former directorsofficer for total consideration of $146,991.

During$100. The shares are being carried as treasury shares as reflected on the year ending December 31, 2011,balance sheet.

On March 2, 2015, the Company issuedeffected a total1:50 reverse stock split. The effect of 24,000,000 shares of its common stock valued at $17,000 as a prepayment for future royalties.


During the year ending December 31, 2011, the Company issued a total of 100,000,000 shares of its common stock valued at $10,000 as a purchase for gold rights.

During the year ending December 31, 2012, the Company issued a total of 1,500,000 shares of its common stock valued at $20,000 as settlement of wages payable to Mr. John Wilkes.

reverse split are shown retroactively in these financial statements.

There were 156,311,1313,136,000 common shares issued and 2,756,000 and 3,136,000 outstanding (post-split) at December 31, 20132014 and 2012, respectively.


There have been no issuances of preferred stock since inception.

F-9

NSU RESOURCES INC
(Formerly Bio-carbon Solutions International, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
Results of operations for the period of January 17, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2013 are unaudited

2013.

Note 4 - Income Taxes

We did not provide any current or deferred U.S. federal income tax provision or benefit for any of the periods presented because we have experienced operating losses since inception. Pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 740, when it is more likely than not that a tax asset cannot be realized through future income, the Company must provide an allowance for this future tax benefit. We provided a full valuation allowance on the net deferred tax asset, consisting of net operating loss carry-forwards, because management has determined that it is more likely than not that we will not earn income sufficient to realize the deferred tax assets during the carry-forward period.


The sources and tax effects of the temporary differences for the periods presented are as follows:

  December 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
Net operating loss carry forward $291,899  $287,004 
Applicable Canadian Federal and Provincial tax rates  26.5%  26.5%
Deferred tax asset  77,353   76,056 
Valuation allowance  (77,353)  (76,056)
Net deferred tax asset $-  $- 


HEMCARE HEALTH SERVICES INC.

(Formerly NSU Resources, Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2014 and 2013

Note 4 - Income Taxes (continued)

  December 31,
2014
  December 31,
2013
 

Net operating loss carry forward

 

$

318,139

  

$

291,899

 

Applicable Canadian Federal and Provincial tax rates

  

26.5

%

  

26.5

%

Deferred tax asset

  

84,307

   

77,353

 

Valuation allowance

  

(84,307

)

  

(77,353

)

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

-

  

$

-

 

This represents an increase in the net operating loss carry forward of $4,895$6,954 and $4,669$4,895 for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013. A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the United States federal statutory rate of 35% to the income tax recorded is as follows:

  December 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
Tax at United States Federal statutory rate (35%) $1,713  $1,634 
Differences in U.S. and Canadian tax rates on provision  (416)  (397)
Increase in valuation allowance  (1,297)  (1,237)
Net deferred tax asset $-  $- 
F-10

NSU RESOURCES INC
(Formerly Bio-carbon Solutions International, Inc.)
 (A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2013 and 2012
Results of operations for the period of January 17, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2013 are unaudited

  December 31, 2014  December 31, 2013 

Tax benefit at United States Federal statutory rate (35%)

 

$

65,221

  

$

1,713

 

Differences in U.S. and Canadian tax rates on provision

  

(15,839

)

  

(416

)

Non-deductible losses-prepaids

  

(42,428

)

    

Increase in valuation allowance

  

(6,954

)

  

(1,297

)

Income tax provision

 

$

-

  

$

-

 

This represents an increase in the valuation allowance of $1,297$6,954 and $1,237$1,297 for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013. The Company did not pay any income taxes during the years ended December 31, 20132014 or 2012,2013, or since inception.


The net federal operating loss carry forward will begin to expire in 2026. This carry forward may be limited upon the consummation of a business combination under IRC Section 381.


Note 5 - Related Party Transactions


During the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the Company received loans from its officers totaling $3,330$18,035 and $17,359$3,330 to fund operations. These loans are non-interest bearing, are due on demand and as such included in current liabilities. Imputed interest has been considered, but determined to be immaterial to the financial statements as a whole.

Note 6 - Excess Cost of Prepaid Royalties Over Value

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued a total of 120,000 preferred shares of $1 par value Series A convertible preferred stock. The shares carried a value of $160,105 resulting in an immediate excess payment over value of $160,105 based on the Company’s determination that it may not realize value for the prepayment resulting in a full charge-off to operations for $160,105.

Note 67 - Subsequent Events

As discussed in the 8K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2015, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation and changed its name from “NSU Resources Inc.” to “HemCare Health Services Inc.” and consolidated its issued capital on a ratio of 1 share for every 50 shares held. Odd lots of the post consolidated shares will be rounded up to the nearest thousand, thus ensuring no shareholder will be left with less than 1,000 shares. The effective date for the split was March 23, 2015.


The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of this filing and determined there are no material events to disclose.


F-11