UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020

 

OR

 

[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ________________ to ________________

 

Commission File No.:000-50296001-15465

 

Intellicheck, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

11-3234779

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

535200 Broad Hollow Road, Suite B51,207, Melville, NY 11747

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (516) 992-1900

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Common Stock, $0.001 par value NYSE AMERICANThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(Title of Class) (Name of exchange on which registered)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,(§232.405 of this chapter) every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

 

Large accelerated

filer [  ]

 Accelerated filer [  ] 

Non-accelerated filer [  ]

(Do not check if a

smaller reporting
company)

 Smaller reporting
company [X]
Emerging Growth Company [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [  ] No [X]

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Issuer: $28,476,656$111,615,707 (based upon the closing price of Issuer’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, as of the last business day of the Issuer’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2017)2020)).

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value 15,608,94318,593,757
(Title of Class) (No. of Shares Outstanding at March 22, 2018)29, 2021)

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Proxy for Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 9, 20185, 2021

 

 

 

 
 

 

Table of Contents

 

PART I 
Item 1.Business3
Item 1A.Risk Factors1613
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments2118
Item 2.Properties2218
Item 3.Legal Proceedings2218
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures2218
   
PART II 
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities2319
Item 6.Selected Financial Data2420
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations2521
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk3327
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data3327
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures3327
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures3427
Item 9B.Other Information3428
   
PART III 
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance3429
Item 11.Executive Compensation3429
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters3529
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence3529
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services3529
   
PART IV 
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules3529

 

2
 

 

PART I

Item 1.Business

Item 1. Business

 

OVERVIEW

 

We were originally incorporated in the state of New York in 1994 as Intelli-Check, Inc. In August 1999, we reincorporated in Delaware. On March 14, 2008, our corporation was renamed Intelli-Check - Mobilisa, Inc. after the consummation of the merger with Mobilisa, Inc. (“Mobilisa”) (references to “Intelli-Check” in this annual report refer to the Company prior to the merger with Mobilisa). At the closing of the merger, our headquarters were moved to Mobilisa’s offices in Port Townsend, Washington. On October 27, 2009, we made a further change in our name to Intellicheck Mobilisa, Inc. On May 4, 2017, with the approval of our shareholders, we changed our name to Intellicheck, Inc. (“Intellicheck,” “we,” “our,” “us,” or “the Company”). On August 31, 2009, the Company acquired 100% of the common stock of Positive Access Corporation (“Positive Access”), a developer of driver license reading technology. The acquisition of Positive Access expanded the Company’s technology portfolio and related product offerings and allowed the Company to reach a larger number of customers through Positive Access’s extensive distribution network. Effective March 19,On December 31, 2018, we relocated our corporate headquarters from Jericho, New York to Melville, New York.formally merged the Mobilisa and Positive Access subsidiaries into one corporation under the name Intellicheck, Inc.

 

We are a prominent technology company engaged in developing, integrating and marketing identity authentication systems for various applications including mobile, handheldverification solutions to address challenges that include commercial retail and integrated systems for the government, militarybanking fraud prevention, access control and commercial markets. Ouridentity validation. Intellicheck’s products include ID-Check, Retail ID and Age ID Check®, a patented technology that instantly reads, analyzes, and verifies encoded data in magnetic stripes and barcodes on government-issue IDs from U.S. and Canadian jurisdictions designed to improvesolution for preventing identity fraud across any industry delivered via smart devices, the customer experience for the financial, hospitality and retail sectors and Defense ID® and Law IDsystems, advanced ID card access control products currently protecting military and federal locations.internet, or integrated into a customer’s system.

 

We plan to expand our business in the near term by pursuing a strategy designed to increase market share in our existing markets and expand into new product markets that are expected to benefit from enhanced safety, regulatory compliancefraud prevention and fraud prevention.identity validation. For example, we have extended our technologies into online applications to provide enhanced safety, regulatory complianceidentity validation and fraud prevention for the billions of transactions that occur online each day. We arehave also developingincorporated biometric, facial recognition and other enhancements to several of our current product offerings.

We sold our wireless enterprise assetsofferings in order to stay on August 31, 2015 to focus the Company’s resources on our core identity authentication business.leading edge of technology.

 

We plan to leverage our intellectual property in the markets we are targeting to strengthen our competitive position.

 

Our primary businesses include Identity Systems products, which include commercial applications of identity card reading authentication and government sales of defense security and identity card applications.

 

Our technologies address problems such as:

 

 Commercial Fraud and Risk Management – which may lead to economic losses to financial institutions and merchants from check cashing, debit and credit card transactions, e-commerce as well as other types of fraud such as identity theft that principally use fraudulent identification documents as proof of identity;
   
 Instant Credit Card Approval –retail stores and financial institutions use our technology to scan a driver license at a kiosk or at the Point Of Sale (POS) and send the information to a credit card underwriterunderwriters and others to get instant approval for a loyalty-branded credit card. This technique protects consumer data and is significantly more likely to result in a completed transaction compared to in-store personnel asking customers to fill out a paper form;
   
 Unauthorized Access – our systems and software are designed to increase security and deter terrorism at airports, shipping ports, rail and bus terminals, military installations, high profile buildings and infrastructure where security is a concern; and
   
 Inefficiencies Associated With Manual Data Entry– by reading encoded data contained in the bar code and magnetic stripe of an identification card with a quick swipe or scan of the card, where permitted by law, customers are capable of accurately and instantaneously inputting information into forms, applications and the like without the errors associated with manual data entry.

 

3
 

 

IDENTITY CARD READING AND VERIFICATION SECTOR

 

Background on Identification Documentation

 

Driver license

 

The driver license is the most widely used form of government issued photo identification in North America. The Real ID Act, which became federal law in May 2005, recognizes that the driver license is also a quasi-identification card. In addition to its primary function, the driver license is used to verify identity for social services, firearm sales, check cashing, credit card issuance and use and other applications. Our technology can read the electronicallydigitally stored barcode information on all currently issued driver licenses (even those that do not comply with the AAMVA/ANSI/ISO standards). Today, all 50 states, the District of Columbia and all 13 Canadian provinces/territories electronicallydigitally store information on their driver license.

 

Non-driver identification card

 

Each U.S. and Canadian Jurisdiction also provides a non-driver identification card as an alternative form of identification for those unable to acquire a driver license. These identification cards are issued with most of the same data found on a driver license. Military documents also provide a means of identification and contain encoded data as well. Since driver licenses are the most widely used form of legally acceptable government documentation, we refer to all these identification documents as “driver licenses.” Our ID√Check®ID Check® software can perform its function on all these forms of identification.

 

Current Challenges Associated with Verifying Identification Documents

 

The high-tech revolution, coupled with the staggering amount of personal information available from data breaches, has created a major problem for those who rely on identification documents. In an age where high-tech scanners, computers and color printers are commonplace, and personal information so cheap to purchase, fake IDs of the highest quality with the identity theft victim’s actual information on the document are easily obtainable from many locations including college campuses and from multiple sites on the Internet. These fakes appear so real, even law enforcement agencies have encountered difficulty distinguishing them from legally issued documents. Additionally, these high-tech devices can easily alter properly issued forms of ID. Therefore, anyone can gain access to a false identity that gives them the ability, in a commercial transaction, to present fake and stolen credit cards or checks that are supported by false identification. Additionally, starting with only a fraudulent driver license, an individual may be able to create multiple identities, commit fraud, buy age restricted products such as alcohol and tobacco while underage, evade law enforcement and engage in other criminal activities, such as:

 

 committing identity theft;theft gaining entrance to high profile buildings and sensitive infrastructures
 
improperly boarding airplanes;airplanes engaging in medical fraud;
fraud
 committing credit card, debit card and check cashing fraud;fraud purchasing age restricted products such as alcohol and tobacco while under age;underage, and
 illegally purchasing firearms;firearms obtaining welfare or other government benefits.
 
unlawfully committing pharmacy fraud including false narcotic prescriptions;
prescriptions   
 committing refund fraud;fraud   

 

Given the ease with which identification can be falsified, simply looking at a driver license may not be sufficient to verify age or identity and determine if it is fraudulent. Since merchants and financial institutions are facing significant economic losses due to these frauds, we believe that a document verificationauthentication system which can accurately read the electronicallydigitally stored information is needed. We possess patented technology that provides an analysis of the data contained on the encoded formats of these identification documents by reading and analyzing the encoded format on the magnetic stripe or bar code on the driver license and comparing it against known standards.

 

4

OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

 

Our Products and Services are generally sold as Software as a Service (“SaaS”) where customers pay for our cloud basedcloud-based service.

 

Identity Systems Products and Services

 

Our Identity Systems are marketed to the Commercial, Financial and Government identification sectors.

 

Commercial Identification

 

ID√Check®ID Check® Family — Solutions and Benefits

 

Our patented ID√Check®ID Check® technology is our advanced document verification software. ID√Check®ID Check® is contained in our software products and is capable of reading and verifying in one swipe or scan the encoded format contained on U.S. and Canadian driver licenses, state issued non-driver identification cards, and military IDs. Our technology has the ability to verify the encoded formats on all currently encoded documents, even those that do not comply with the standards of the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (’‘AAMVA’’), the American National Standards Institute (’‘ANSI’’) and the International Standards Organization (’‘ISO’’).

 

We believe that ID√Check®ID Check® and our family of software solutions contain the most advanced, reliable, and effective technology, providing users with an easy, reliable, and cost-effective method of document and age verification. We have received/acquired encoding formats from multiple sources. This information, combined with our patentedproprietary technology, enables all our ID√Check®ID Check® software products to read, decode, process, and verify the encoded formats on driver licenses. As jurisdictions change their documents and guidelines, we believe our software can be adapted to these changes.

 

The ID√Check®ID Check® technology is embedded in many of our product lines including Retail ID, Law ID, Defense ID®, Age ID, Guest ID, Access ID, and TWIC ID some of which are discussed below.for the retail, banking, government, age restricted products, hospitality or any other use case where knowing a person’s identity is important.

 

ID√Check®ID Check® software does not require a connection to a central database to operate, thus negating privacy concerns. Many of our products have the ability tocan operate add-on peripherals such as printers, fingerprint readers and other devices.

 

The ID√Check®ID Check® process is quick, simple, and easy to use. After matching the driver license photograph to the person presenting the document for identification, the user simply scans or swipes the driver license through a data capture device. For additional authentication in an online transaction, the Company also has a biometric facial recognition solution, through partnerships, for person not present transactions. The user simply scans the front of the license and takes a selfie then the software compares the images to verify the person. The software quickly determines if:

 

 the format of the document is valid;
 
the document has been altered or is fake, by displaying the parsed, encoded data for comparison with the printed information;
 
the document has expired; and
 
the encoded data contains a date of birth equal to or greater than the legal age to purchase age restricted products, such as alcohol, vaping, cannabis and tobacco.tobacco; and

if using biometric facial matching if there is a match and if liveliness was detected

 

Then, the ID√Check®ID Check® software applications can:

 

 respond to the user by displaying the format verification result and the parsed information;
 
● save information that is permissible by law to memory; and
 
print a record of the transaction including the verification results if a printer is part of the hardware configuration.

5

ID√Check®ID Check® SDK

 

Our software product, ID√Check®ID Check® SDK, is designed for software developers that wish to incorporate our proprietary ID√Check®ID Check® technology into their applications. We currently have multiple license agreements with third parties for integration and sub-licensing of our software applications into their core applications. The SDK is available for multiple platforms such as Microsoft Windows, Windows Mobile,iOS and Android. Users receive a text message with instructions to scan their driver license. AIX and certain versions of Linux and is also offered as a SaaS product that provides a platform independent &and centralized update solution for quicker and easier integration. It can easily be ported to other platforms as the need arises. New integrations are being sold as hosted cloud basedcloud-based SaaS products and the customer purchases monthly, quarterly, annually, or longer subscriptions for use of the software.

 

ID Check® - Retail IDTM

 

Our Retail IDTM Check application is a proven identity authentication solution that can instantly and accurately authenticate identification documents such as a driver license.license and is available in several deployment strategies. This solution is designed to deliver better service, increase loyalty and credit card programs and reduce fraud. Retail IDTM Check reduces liability risks and ensures compliance by checking all retrieved data against each state’s privacy laws and regulatory requirements.

 

Retail ID Check® - OnlineTM

 

Retail ID OnlineTMOur online offering instantly and accurately authenticates an on-line user’s identification documents such as a driver license and helps eliminate fraud associated with online transactions. Users receive a text message with instructions to scan their driver license. With online fraud growing daily, we believe that this new product is the right solution at the right time.

 

Retail ID Check® - MobileTM®

 

Retail ID MobileTMThis product provides the fraud reduction benefits of Retail IDTM,an integrated identity validation system, without the time and expense of integrating the Retail IDTMapplication into the customer’s point of sale system. With Retail ID MobileTM, theThe customer simply downloads the application to a mobile device such as a tablet or smartphone and instantly begin receiving the benefits from Retail ID’sour fraud reduction capabilities.

 

Age ID Check® - IAMTM

 

Age IDTM is the designation for multiple hand-held devices that we offer our customers. The form-factor is a small, lightweight mobile computer with a durable housing design that has 2-D bar code and magnetic stripe reading capabilities. By allowing the user to move between locations, Age IDTM products provide the ability to check the encoded format of ID documents at multiple entry points. It additionally has the capability of providing a yes/no response when used for age verification purposes.

Guest IDTM

Guest IDTM is aThis software application that speeds up check-in and ID verification atwithin the property management systems in places like hotels, motels, commercial buildings and motels. This product enhances user productivity by automating data entry thus improving accuracy. Guest IDTM speeds up the hotel check-in process and is incorporated into legacy Property Management Systems.prisons.

 

ID√Check®POS

ID√Check®POS is a software application that runs on multiple VeriFone devices, such as the Omni 37xx series. Our software uses both the onboard magnetic stripe reader and an optional external 2-D bar code reader that plugs into an open port on the back of the unit. The terminal has an integrated, high-speed thermal printer. The VeriFone devices are multi-application terminals that allow the ID√Check®software to run side by side with credit card processing software as well as other value-added software applications certified by VeriFone. We have been designated as a VeriFone value added partner.

ID√Check®BHO

This software product, formerly called the Web Form Filler product, is a Browser Helper Object (“BHO”) for the Microsoft Browser. The BHO allows our customers to seamlessly integrate our core ID√Check®technology into their web based applications. The BHO can be programmed through a series of drop down menus to populate driver license data in the fields of specific web pages based on web page URLs and web page field names. The technology also provides the ability to check the encoded formats of ID documents.

6

ID√Check®Check® PC

 

ID√Check®ID Check® PC is a standalone software solution that is designed to provide the features of ID√Check®ID Check® for Windows based platforms. It allows the user to instantly view data from government issued IDs such as driver licenses and contains features such as recurring entry and age verification.

 

State Aware Software

 

Our patented State Aware Software solution provides or restricts information that is electronically scanned from an ID based on the electronic reading laws according to the state in which the ID is scanned. For example, scanning an ID in New Hampshire for law enforcement purposes is allowed, whereas electronically scanning an ID for a mailing list is not allowed. With all the various uses of scanning and verifying an ID, it is important for responsible users to be aware of the different state laws. State Aware Software incorporates each state’s requirements around electronic capture of ID barcode data directly into hosted ID Check software.

Data Collection Devices

 

Our software products are designed for use with multiple data collection devices, which are commercially available in various compact forms and may contain either one or both of 2-D bar code and magnetic stripe readers. These devices enable our software applications to be used on a variety of commercially available data processing devices, including credit card terminals, PDAs, tablets, laptops, desktops, mobile phones, and point-of-sale terminals. Many of these devices contain an electronic serial number (ESN) to prevent unauthorized use of our software.

 

Instant Credit Application Kiosk Software Applications

 

These are custom software applications that Intellicheck Mobilisa has developed for a variety of major financial service companies and retail stores. The software installed on multiple kiosk devices provides the customers of the major financial service companies and retail stores with the ability to perform in-store instant credit approval on these devices. The hardware platforms, on which the software applications run, range from stationary devices to handhelds to tablet PCs. The process involves the swiping or scanning of the driver license to verify the encoded format and after verification, the information parsed from the encoded data is populated into the proper fields on the application displayed on the kiosk. The applicant then completes the application by entering the remaining required information that is not encoded on the driver license, such as social security and telephone numbers. The software application then sends the data to the financial service company’s backend ’‘decisioning’’ tool for credit approval. If approved, the applicant is granted instant credit which can then be used to make purchases.

 

Upgrade Capability

 

Our ID√Check®ID Check® Products and related databases are constantly updated to stay current with identification formats and new forms of ID.

Government Identification

Defense ID® System

Our Defense ID® System offers law enforcement personnel and military security officers additional information for protecting their facilities. The Defense ID System uses rugged, handheld, mobile devices and desktop visitor/vendor approval workstations to read barcodes, magnetic stripes, RFID (radio frequency identification) and OCR (optical character recognition) codes printed on current forms of identification cards. By scanning and comparing the information contained on the ID card to over 100 databases, Defense ID® can immediately determine if the card has been reported lost or stolen, the individual’s identity information matches watch lists or law enforcement databases, or if they are on an authorized roster of previously-cleared personnel.

7

Law ID

A mobile app for bona fide law enforcement officers that performs real time queries against State DMV, State Criminal Justice Databases and FBI NCIC (National Crime Information Center) records. Every day officers turn their backs on potentially dangerous persons. Now, the Law Enforcement Officer (“LEO”) can instantly have DOL/DMV, State and Federal search results instantly while maintaining subject visibility. Without the need to return to a vehicle to enter driver license data or to contact dispatch by radio, the app uses the Smart Phone camera to extract the 2D barcode information from driver licenses and other identification documents, instantly returning to the officer query results from DOL/DMV, State and Federal criminal justice databases. These results include DOL/DMV photos, vehicle/weapon registration information and a wealth of additional information that may be critical to officer safety.

TWIC ID

Provides ports and facilities with an innovative, integrated, efficient way to validate ID credentials of individuals requesting entry to secure areas. Our TWIC reading software and hardware meets all TSA requirements for portable readers and is listed on the TSA’s QTL (Qualified Technology List). The TWIC ID Reader is proving to be an instrumental component to port security as we continue to help many U.S. ports of all sizes in further protecting their facilities.

Visitor Center (IM 3000)

The Visitor Center is a component of our Defense ID® system and makes it faster and easier to process visitors and vendors. Using the visitor center system, it pre-populates fields by scanning the government-issued ID, performs a real-time background check utilizing over 100 databases to verify the individual is not on a wanted list and if the individual has been pre-approved to access the facility or building. The Visitor Center can then take photos and prints a visit pass or new local ID card, all in a matter of seconds.

Upgrade Capability

Like our ID√Check®products, our Defense ID® products are constantly updated to stay current with identification formats and new forms of ID. In addition, we continuously update the databases related to lost or stolen cards, watch lists and law enforcement database updates, and authorized rosters of cleared personnel. Our Defense ID® Systems are maintained via annual subscriptions that are purchased by our customers.

 

STRATEGY

 

Our objective is to be a leading securityidentity verification company providing world class solutions in the identity sector. These solutions include our commercial identity systems focusing on work-flow,workflow, productivity enhancement, fraud protection and risk management segments; our government identity systems focusing on access control, vendor validation, and suspect identification.segments. Key elements of our strategy are as follows:

 

Commercial Systems

 

Productivity Enhancement. We market our technology as a key productivity enhancement tool. Our patented ID√Check®proprietary ID Check® software can add functionality to virtually any given software application to automatically populate fields within a given form, when a government-issued photo ID is presented. Our ability to correctly read and authenticate all U.S. jurisdictions, coupled with our patentedproprietary technology, is a key differentiator from our competitors. The automation resulting from the intelligence added to the form dramatically increases throughput and data integrity, and it significantly enhances the customer’s experience.

 

Develop Additional Strategic Alliances with Providers of Security Solutions. We have entered into strategic alliances to utilize our systems and software as the proposed or potential enrollment application for their technologies and to jointly market these security applications with multiple biometric companies:companies. Some of these companies have included Lenel, AMAG Technology, Inc., in the defense industry; Zebra Technologies hardware manufacturers; and Idemia Identity & Security USA.USA, facial biometrics companies Ipsidy and Applied Recognition. We are an associate member of AAMVA and a member of AAMVA’s Industry Advisory Board. We believe these relationships will broaden our marketing reach through their sales efforts and we intend to develop additional strategic alliances with additional providers of security solutions.

8

 

Strengthen Sales and Marketing Efforts. We intend to capitalize on the growth in demand for document verification and productivity enhancement by continuing to market and support our systems and software. Our sales and marketing departments are organized by geographic area to provide focus and proximity to build solid long-term relationships. Our recent focus has been on SaaS license arrangements in the financial services, retail, and hospitality services industries.

Enter into Additional Licensing Agreements. We intend to continue to license our software for use with a customer’s system. We are currently licensing our ID√Check®ID Check® SDK software product for Windows, Windows CE, Windows MobileiOS, Android and other operating system platforms and intend to similarly continue to license our ID√Check®ID Check® PC software solutions. Our software is intended to be used with a compatible hardware device. We have entered into multiple licensing agreements to date.

 

Protect Intellectual Property. We intend to protect our intellectual property portfolio to preserve value and obtain favorable settlements where warranted.

 

Government Identity Systems

Product Enhancement. Due to the success of Defense ID® in the military and government industry sectors, we have enhanced our product line to support other entities such as law enforcement, port security and commercial installations. We continue our ongoing efforts to research and implement the use of new identification cards, additional databases and upgraded equipment form factors to increase the efficiency and performance of the system.

TWIC Program. We were on the first list of ICE (Initial Capability Evaluation) readers and will continue to provide our software on additional hardware platforms to address the unique needs of each port and facility. We have combined our Defense ID®and TWIC reader applications to provide customers with the benefits of each product in a single device and are the first company to have readers listed on the TSA’s QTL (Qualified Technology List).

Strengthen Sales and Marketing Efforts. As the need for access control systems continues to grow, our experienced sales and marketing departments are adjusting to target new sectors. Sales and marketing materials are specially designed to clearly outline the capabilities of the system and how it is valuable to each of these specific sectors. We have sales staff and office locations on the East and West Coasts, which allows a quick response to questions and personalized assistance for each customer based on location.

Additional Access to Multiple Databases. We continue to increase the data source information accessed through our Defense ID®system. This is achieved by increasing the capabilities of our internally-developed scraping programs for publicly-available information as well as by negotiating additional data source agreements with various law enforcement and government agencies. In addition to these general databases, we can customize databases for each individual customer based on information provided by the customer.

Our Revenue Sources

 

We derive our revenue from the following sources:

 

Sales of our systems by both our own direct sales force and marketing partners;
Per transaction or subscription fees (SaaS) from the licensed use of our technology;
● Revenue sharing and marketing arrangements through strategic alliances and partnerships; and
● Sale of software upgradesSelect hardware sales related to SaaS implementation, Windows CE and extended maintenance programs; andWindows Mobile

9

 

Our Target Industry Sectors

 

Commercial Identity Systems

 

The use of false identification cards, primarily driver licenses and non-driver identification cards, to engage in commercial fraud, to gain access to unauthorized areas and to gain entry to critical infrastructure is all too common and the problem is growing with each passing day. Given the ease with which identification can be falsified, we believe that simply looking at a driver license is not sufficient to verify identity and determine if such an identification card is fraudulent. Since merchants and financial institutions are facing significant economic losses due to these frauds, we believe that what they need is a document authentication system that can accurately read the electronicallydigitally stored information. We target the industry sectors that would most benefit from our systems and software.

 

We also market our products to opportunities where our ID√Check®ID Check® technology can be used to enhance productivity. We have made significant progress in the sectors for the retail issuance of instant credit. We believe there are financial benefits and compelling business models for customers in this sector to utilize our technology.

 

Productivity Enhancement

 

 ● Mass merchandisers and retailers Auto dealerships and rental car agencies
 ● Banks and other financial institutions Casinos for enrollment of guests
 Credit unions Hospital patient admissions
 ● Credit card issuers Lodging Industry
 ● Check cashing services Airlines

 

Commercial fraud protection

 

 ● Mass merchandisers and retailers Auto dealerships and rental car agencies
 Banks and other financial institutions Casino cage operations
 ● Credit unions Hospitals, medical facilities and health plans
 ● Credit card issuers Lodging Industry
 ● Check cashing services Pharmacies

 

Access control

 

 Airports and airlines Prisons
 Departments of Motor Vehicles Law enforcement agencies
 Notable buildings Military establishments
 Court houses College campuses
 Nuclear facilities Department of Homeland Security
 Oil refineries and storage facilities Bus, rail and port facilities

8

 

Age verification

 

 Bars and night clubs Stadiums and arenas
 Convenience stores Casinos and gaming establishments
 Grocery chains Sellers of sexually explicit materialLaw Enforcement
 

Restaurants

 

Firearm dealers

Government Identity Systems

Our Defense ID® system is tailored to locations that validate identification cards as a means of access. Historically, the military sector has been the primary focus, followed closely by sea ports, oil refineries and the law enforcement sector. Military bases, for example, are an ideal location for the use of the Defense ID® system because individual ID cards are checked prior to allowing base access and, in most cases, bases issue visitor/vendor passes to individuals needing access that do not possess a military ID.

10

Because Defense ID® is customizable, it can be used in many different environments. The information provided via instant access to multiple law enforcement databases proves invaluable to gate officers and law enforcement personnel ensuring the security of a facility. Current targets include:

Military

ArmyNavy
 Air ForceCannabis Industry Marines
Coast GuardMilitary Academies
Military and Veterans HospitalsOil Refineries
Airports and Seaports 

 

Law Enforcement/Government

 

 FBI Drug Enforcement Administration
 State & Local Police Local Sheriffs
 Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Intelligence Agencies
 Customs Department of Transportation
 Department of Homeland Security Border Patrol

REPRESENTATIVE CUSTOMERS

Commercial Identity Systems

We have generated revenues from our customers from the sale of systems, licensing of software and sale of software upgrades. The following representative customers have used or are using our systems and software for commercial fraud protection and productivity enhancement:

Fidelity Information ServicesFoxwoods Resorts and Casino
MGM GrandMohegan Sun Resort Casino
Caesar’s PalaceBarclaycard USA
EnterpriseJPMorgan Chase
Toys R UsLL Bean
Alliance DataSynchrony Financial
Rooms to GoAT&T
WalmartWinn Dixie
HertzVerizon

The following representative customers and programs have used or are using our systems and software for access control:

John F. Kennedy International Airport in New YorkDelaware Department of Motor Vehicles
● O’Hare International Airport in ChicagoPort of Houston
Reagan National Airport in Washington, DCPort of New Orleans
● New York Stock ExchangeNew Hampshire Dept. of Motor Vehicles
● Fort Sam HoustonPort Authority of New York and New Jersey
Fort HoodPort of Hawaii
● Force Protection IndustriesUnited States Supreme Court
New York Department of Motor VehiclesRegistered Traveler Program
● Vermont Department of Motor VehiclesDelaware Department of Motor Vehicles

11

The following representative customers are using or have used our systems and software for age verification:

Idaho State Liquor DispensaryDrake Petroleum
SunocoHouston’s Restaurants
Exxon/Mobil franchisees

Government Identity Systems

We have generated revenue from our customers from the sale of systems, licensing of software and sale of extended service agreements. The following representative customers have used or are using our systems and software for security and identification purposes.

The United States Air Force AcademyFort Richardson
Fort WainwrightBolling AFB
Elmendorf Air Force Base (“AFB”)Fort Polk
Andrews AFBFort Dix
Fort MeadeYuma Marine Corps Base
Fort BelvoirWalter Reed Army Hospital
USMC Parris IslandMcChord AFB
The U.S. Military Academy at West PointClaremont County Sheriff Department
Bangor Naval Submarine BaseFort Sill
Fort Jackson29 Palms
Fort Leonard WoodCamp Atterbury
Fort BenningFort Stewart

 

MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION

 

Commercial Identity Systems

 

Our objective is to become thea leading developer and distributor of document and age verification products. To date, our marketing efforts have been through direct sales by our sales and marketing personnel, through resellers and license agreements. We are marketing our products through direct marketing approaches such as web marketing, a small number of select trade shows and well knownwell-known public interest and trade associations.

 

We generate revenues from the licensing of our software and to a lesser extent the selling of bundled solutions that contain hardware and software. Depending on the specific needs of our clients, we tailor the right solution for them. Our bundled solutions are sold on a SaaS basis.

 

Our ID√Check®ID Check® software is available to customers via the cloud (SaaS) and available for Microsoft Windows and Windows Mobile platforms, Android and iOS in addition to devices such as credit card terminals and other operating systems such as Linux. We are marketing our ID√Check®ID Check® technology to the financial institutions, mass merchandisers, government, airlines, airports, high profile buildings or infrastructure, mass merchandisers, grocery, convenience and pharmacy chains, casinos and banks.casinos.

 

We have developed a comprehensive marketing plan to build customer awareness and develop brand recognition in our target industry sectors. We promote the advantages and ease of use of our products through:

 

 Endorsements by nationally known public interest groups and trade associations; Web seminars, as well as our own website; and
 Trade publications; Various conventions and industry specific seminars.
 Trade shows;  

 

We intend to continue to develop and market other related software applications.

12

Government Identity Solutions

We have sector-specific brochures for each product in our product line for both the military, port and law enforcement sectors that the sales force utilizes when demonstrating the Defense ID® system to potential customers. These brochures serve as a quick reference guide outlining the capabilities of our technology. Once customers have a clear understanding of our products, they can use these brochures to discuss their individual needs and ordering requirements.

When dealing with military and government entities, we must comply with applicable procurement regulations.

In addition to sole source awards, we also respond to Requests for Proposal (“RFPs”) and Requests for Qualifications (“RFQs”) when our technological capabilities meet that of the desired system. In many cases, we are the only company that can meet the requirements in the RFP, which can lead to a quick and easy award.

Also, we have all Defense ID® products, as well as individual labor services, listed on GSA Schedule 70. This makes it possible for government entities to make direct purchases of equipment and services for a pre-negotiated price without having to go through the formal RFP/Bid process.

We have offices in New York and Washington State to fully support our current and potential customers. This makes it easy to schedule and complete installations and maintenance in an efficient, time-conscious manner.

 

MAJOR CUSTOMERS

 

Although the composition of our largest customers has changed from year to year, a significant portion of our revenues have been attributable to a limited number of major customers. In 2017,2020, our top ten customers accounted for approximately 57%75% of total revenues. In 2016,2019, our top ten customers accounted for approximately 50%66% of total revenues. While we believe that one or more major customers could account for a significant portion of our sales for at least the next two years, we anticipate that our customer base will continue to expand and that in the future we will be less dependent on major customers.

 

9

REGULATION

 

The sale and use of the Company’sour Identity System products are not subject to regulation, such as on data protection and storage, by government authorities. We work on an ongoing basis with our customers to facilitate their compliance with such regulations. Additionally, we believe that we are currently in compliance with applicable United States, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment.

 

COMPETITION

 

Commercial Identity Systems

 

We compete in an industry that is intensely competitive and rapidly changing. Unless a device can read, decode and analyze all the information that is legally permitted to be analyzed, which is electronicallydigitally stored within the barcode on a driver license, the user may not obtain accurate and reliable confirmation that a driver license is valid and has not been altered or tampered with. We are aware of several companies that are currently offering products that electronically read and calculate age from a driver license. We have tested and compared some of these products to ID√Check®ID Check® and believe that our product is superior in quality and functionality. We believe that units unable to read bar codes are at a significant disadvantage because all states and Canadian provinces currently utilize bar codes to encode their driver licenses, as well as all U.S. military IDs and uniformed services cards.

In the government identity sector, there are several companies, including Idemia USA, EID Passport and HID Global that are currently offering products that compete with the Defense ID® system. The U.S. government also has DBIDS and AIE that compete with our products.

We are also aware that Zebra and Honeywell are offering an embedded driver’s license reading solution on a tether scanner.

13

 

We have experienced and expect to continue to experience increased competition in the document verification sector. If any of our competitors were to become the industry standard or were to enter or expand relationships with significantly larger companies through mergers, acquisitions or otherwise, our business and operating results could be seriously harmed. In addition, potential competitors could bundle their products or incorporate functionality into existing products in a manner that discourages users from purchasing our products.

 

MANUFACTURING

 

We do not manufacture readers or input devices but use products from several manufacturers. Some of these devices are private labeled and programmed by the supplier to work with our ID√Check®ID Check® technology. Most of our hardware consists of commercial off-the-shelf (“COTS”) products. We rely on a small number of suppliers to provide our COTS products.

Our government identity systems products are created with COTS items that we customize with software and specialized configurations. All products are customized, assembled, and tested in-house and then installed and placed by our employees in the field.

 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

 

Our research and development (“R&D”) efforts are mainly concentrated in two areas. The most significant effort is concentrated in the identity sector. We modify existing software applications based on customer’s requirements, which are fee based. In addition, we develop new software solutions and make improvements to existing software platforms, which are funded internally. R&D spending during the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 was $1,916,107$3,674,987 and $2,405,593,$3,656,679, respectively.

 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

 

We currently hold twenty-two (22)eighteen (18) U.S. patents, two (2) Canadian patents and one (1) United KingdomCanadian patent. At present, we have otherfour patent applications pending in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as internationally.Office. These patents cover commercially important aspects of our capabilities relating to the authentication and verification of identification documents, and relating to our Defense ID® System technology.documents. We will continue to pursue patents for all of our new technologies arising from our research and development efforts.

In January 1999, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granted us a patent on our ID√Check®ID Check® software technology. In October 2002, we were granted another patent relating to our document authentication and age verification technology. In January 2009, we were granted another patent that is a continuation of our patents relating to our document authentication and age verification technology. Upon our acquisition of the assets of IDentiScan, we also received equitable ownership and sole ownership rights to its intellectual property, including other patents and patent applications relating to age verification technology.

 

During 2010, we were granted two additional patents. The first patent was for a software key control for mobile devices. It is used to get a registration key for the parser that is based on the unique internal ID of one mobile device. The Mobile Key Manager communicates with the mobile device, reading its ID, and then requests a registration key specific for that ID from Intellicheck Mobilisa’s server. This server maintains a database of all customers using IDecode Mobile Parsers, including the number of licenses they have purchased, the latest software version for which they have paid support, and the registration keys and unique device IDs associated with those licenses. The server generates a new registration key unique to the device ID and returns it to the Mobile Key Manager to register that device. In this way, the customer can deploy the IDecode Mobile Parser to only one mobile device for each parser purchased.

 

The second patent was related to a document comparison system and reinforces the innovative nature of Intellicheck Mobilisa’sIntellicheck’s security solutions involving documents. The technology described in the patent relates to a system and method for comparing information contained in at least two documents. LikeFor example, information on at least two different documents iscan be compared to determine whether the information is the same on each document. For instance, a name contained on an individual’s driver’s license is automatically compared with a name contained on the individual’s airline boarding pass.

14

 

In 2011, we were issued another patent. This patent allows for verifying and authenticating the encoded information on driver licenses of all 50 states and other North American driver licenses and allows the information to be electronically transferred in a secure environment to a local or remote jurisdiction for age verification, organ donor, or criminal activity checks critical in fighting both crime and terrorism.

 

In 2012, we were granted a patent relating to a system and method for comparing information contained in at least two documents, but not limited to just a driver license and passport. This patent compares “like information” on different documents to determine whether the information is the same on each document. As an example, a passport is compared to a boarding pass to determine if “like information” matches, for instance name and birthdate.

 

We were also granted a patent related to a system that uses environmental information to determine a level of scrutiny that is to be applied to identification information received at a location where user identification is being checked. Depending on the level of scrutiny that is applied and on generated candidate scores, the system will display many potential persons of interest that match the received identification information.

 

In 2013, we were granted four patents that are continuations of earlier-filedpreviously filed applications we previously filed. One patent is related to a document comparison system that compares information contained in two documents to determine whether the information is substantially identical on each document. An indication is provided as to whether the two documents identify the same entity or do not identify the same entity. The second patent relates to improvements to software key control for mobile devices. The third patent relates to an apparatus for extracting date of birth information from driver’s licenses and displaying a calculated age along with a license background graphic. Finally, the fourth patent is related to a system that uses environmental information to determine a level of scrutiny that is to be applied to identification information received at a location and to display many potential persons of interest that match the received identification information based on the applied level of scrutiny.

 

In 2014, we were granted one patent that was also a continuation of an earlier-filed application. The patent is related to a document comparison system that compares information contained in two documents to determine whether certain information is substantially identical on each document. The system provides a positive or negative indication as to whether portions of the two documents are substantially identical.

 

In 2015, we acquired an intellectual property portfolio that includes four patents involving technologies for checking the validity of identification documents using a remote database. Certain patents in this portfolio address the use of biometric information and identification credentials as part of the process to control access to a secured area.

WeIn 2015 we were also granted two patents in 2015.patents. The first patent is related to a system and method for comparing documents. The second patent is identity matching in response to threat levels.

 

In 2016, we were granted three patents that were a continuation of earlier filed applications. The first patent related to comparing documents. The second patent related to identity in response to threat levels. Finally, the third patent is related to checking the validity of identification documents using a remote database.

We were also granted two patents in 2016 in Canada. The first patent is related to a system and method for comparing documents. The second patent is related to identity matching in response to threat levels.

We were granted one patent in 2017 that was also a continuation of an earlier filed application. The patent is related to checking the validity of identification documents using a remote database.

In 2018, we were granted one patent that was also a continuation of an earlier filed application to a document comparison that compares information contained in multiple documents.

We were granted two patents in 2019 that were a continuation of earlier filed applications. The first patent is related to checking the validity of identification documents using a remote database. The second patent related to identification scanning in compliance with jurisdictional or other rules.

In 2020, we were granted two patents that were a continuation of earlier filed applications. The first patent is related to checking the validity of identification documents using a remote database. The second patent is related to document comparison that compares information contained in multiple documents.

We own multiple copyrights in the United States, which are effective in Canada and in other major industrial countries. The copyright protection covers software source codes and supporting graphics relating to the operation of ID√Check®ID Check® and other software products. We also have several trademarks relating to our company, its product names, and logos.

In connection with the sales or licensing of our intellectual property, we have entered into an agreement with a former officer, under which we will pay royalties equal to 0.005% of cumulative gross sales for cumulative gross sales of $2,000,000 to $52,000,000 and 0.0025% of cumulative gross sales for cumulative gross sales more than $52,000,000 pertaining to those patents on which this former officer was identified as an inventor. Cumulatively through December 31, 2017 total fees paid under this agreement were approximately $2,000.

 

Employees AND HUMAN CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

As of March 21, 2018,26, 2021, we had twenty-ninethirty-seven full-time employees. ThreeFive are engaged in executive management thirteensuch as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, nineteen in information technology tenincluding those participating in our research and development efforts, seven in sales and marketing, three in integration and customer support and three in administration. All employees are employed “at will.” We believe our relations with our employees are generally positive and we have no collective bargaining agreements with any labor unions.

 

Our human capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating our existing and new employees. The principal purposes of our equity and cash incentive plans are to attract, retain and reward personnel, whether existing employees or new hires, through the granting of stock-based and cash-based compensation awards. We believe that this increases value to our stockholders and the success of our company by motivating such individuals to perform to the best of their abilities and achieve our objectives.

As the success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of our employees, we are committed to their health, safety and wellness. We provide our employees and their families with access to convenient health and wellness programs, including benefits that provide protection and security giving them peace of mind concerning events that may require time away from work or that impact their financial well-being; and that offer choice where possible so they can customize their benefits to meet their needs and the needs of their families. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented significant changes that we determined were in the best interest of our employees, as well as the community in which we operate, and which comply with government regulations, including working in a remote environment where appropriate or required.

12
 15

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

RISK FACTORS

 

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

 

We have incurred principallyhad losses since inception and losses may continue, which could result in a decline in the value of our securities and a loss of your investment.

 

We sustainedhad net lossesincome of $6,020,505 and $5,734,681$558,397 for the fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively,a net loss of ($2,548,711) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and our accumulated deficit was $110,422,825$116,376,715 as of December 31, 2017.2020. Since we expect to incur additional expenditures in line with the sales growth of our business, we may not continue to achieve operating profits in the near future.future and we could experience further losses. This could lead to a decline in the value of our securities.

 

Our proprietary software relies on reference data provided by government and quasi-government agencies. If these governmental and quasi-government agencies were to stop sharing data with us, the utility of our proprietary software would be diminished in those jurisdictions and our business would be damaged.

 

Currently, the fifty states, ten Canadian provinces and the District of Columbia, in most instances, conform to the guidelines established by certain organizations responsible for implementing industry standards, cooperate with us by providing sample identification cards so that we may modify all our hardware and software products to read and analyze the encoded information found on such jurisdiction’s identification cards. If one or more of these jurisdictions do not continue to provide this reference data, the utility of our proprietary software may be diminished in those jurisdictions.

 

Our business strategy exposes us to long sales and implementation cycles for our products.

 

Our target customers in the commercial fraud protection, access control and age verification industry sectors include large retailers and to a lesser extent, government agencies, which typically require longer sales and implementation cycles for our products than do our potential customer base solely interested in age verification, such as restaurant, bar and convenience store operators. The longer sales and implementation cycles for larger retail companies continue to have an adverse impact on the timing of realizing our revenues. In addition, budgetary constraints and potential economic slowdowns may also continue to delay purchasing decisions by these prospective customers. These initiatives have costs associated with them, and we cannot assure you that they ultimately will prove successful, or result in, an increase to our revenues or profitability.

 

We could be negatively impacted by the recent outbreak of coronavirus (COVID-19).

In addition,December 2019, it was first reported that there had been an outbreak of a novel strain of COVID-19, in China. Since then, COVID-19 has continued to spread outside of China, including throughout the loss United States and other parts of the world, becoming a global pandemic. For the period covered by this Form 10-K, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our business and will likely continue to impact our business directly and/or significant reductionindirectly for the foreseeable future. While we are hopeful that widespread vaccinations from COVID-19 will usher a new sense of normalcy, we are unable to accurately predict the full impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on our results of operations or financial condition due to numerous factors that are not within our control, including the duration and severity of the outbreak together with any additional statewide closures resulting from increases in cases nationwide, whether from COVID-19 or recently discovered variants.

Governments in affected regions have implemented and may continue to implement safety precautions, including stay-at-home orders, travel restrictions, business closures, cancellations of public gatherings, and other measures. Other organizations and individuals are taking additional steps to avoid or reduce infection, including limiting travel and having employees work remotely. These measures are disrupting normal business operations both in and outside of affected areas. We continue to monitor our operations and government spending by government entities could materially limitrecommendations and have made appropriate modifications to our operations because of COVID-19, including transitioning to a remote work environment, substantial reductions in employee travel, virtualization or cancellation of customer and employee events, and remote sales, implementation, and support activities, among other modifications. These decisions may delay or reduce sales and harm productivity and collaboration. The cancellation of industry events nationwide reduces our ability to obtain government contracts. These limitations, if significant,meet with existing and potential new customers. Our customers’ businesses could also have a material adverse effectbe disrupted or they could seek to limit technology spending, either of which could foreclose future business opportunities, could negatively impact the willingness of our customers to enter into or renew contracts with us, and ultimately adversely affect our revenues. Although we are unable to predict the precise impact of COVID-19 on our business, financial condition and resultsour business depends to a large extent on the willingness of operations. customers to enter into or renew contracts with us.

In addition, we will needwhile the long-term economic impact and the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic may be difficult to develop additional strategic relationships with large government contractorsassess or predict, the widespread pandemic has resulted in, and may continue to successfully competeresult in, significant disruption of global financial markets, which could reduce our ability to access capital and could negatively affect our liquidity and the liquidity and stability of markets for government contracts. Should we loseour common stock. In addition, a recession, further market correction or faildepression resulting from the spread of COVID-19 and the overall economic effect to develop these strategic relationships we may not be able to implementthe U.S. and world economies could materially affect our business strategy.and the value our common stock.

 

The industry for our systems and software is evolving and its growth is uncertain.

 

Demand as well as industry acceptance for recently introduced and existing systems, and software and sales from such systems and software, are subject to a high level of uncertainty and risk. With changing administration in government, changes in government budgets, and slowly evolving government standards on use of identity products, the government sector is slowly developing. The commercial sector can develop faster than the government sector, but it is also subject to a higher level of uncertainty because of potential uncertainty in the continued financial health of our commercial customers, as well as long sales cycles. Our business may suffer if the industry develops more slowly than anticipated and does not sustain industry acceptance.

 

16

Failure to manage our operations if they expand could impair our future growth.

 

If we can expand our operations, particularly through multiple sales to large retailers and government agencies in the document verification industry, the expansion will place significant strain on our management, financial controls, operating systems, personnel and other resources. Our ability to manage future growth, should it occur, will depend upon several factors, including our ability to do the following:

 

 build and train our sales force;
 
● establish and maintain relationships with distributors;
 
● develop customer support systems;
 
● develop expanded internal management and financial controls adequate to keep pace with growth in personnel and sales, if they occur; and
 
● manage the use of third-party manufacturers and suppliers.

 

If we can grow our business but do not manage our growth successfully, we may experience increased operating expenses, loss of customers, distributors, or suppliers and declining or slowed growth of revenues.

 

Failure to protect our proprietary technology may impair our competitive position.

 

We continue to allocate significant resources to developing new and innovative technologies that are utilized in our products and systems. Because our continued success depends on, to a significant degree, our ability to offer products providing superior functionality and performance over those offered by our competitors, we consider the protection of our technology from unauthorized use to be fundamental to our success. This is done by processes aimed at identifying and seeking appropriate protection for newly-developednewly developed intellectual property, including patents, trade secrets, copyrights, and trademarks, as well as policies aimed at identifying unauthorized use of such property. These processes include:

 

 ● contractual arrangements providing for nondisclosure of proprietary information;
 
● maintaining and enforcing issued patents and filing patent applications on innovative solutions to commercially important problems;
 
● protecting trade secrets;
 
● protecting copyrights and trademarks by registration and other appropriate means;
 
● establishing internal processes for identifying and appropriately protecting new and innovative technologies; and
 
● establishing practices for identifying unauthorized use of intellectual property.

 

Litigation can be very costly and divert management’s attention. An adverse outcome in any litigation may have a severe negative effect on our financial results. To determine the priority of inventions, we may have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or oppositions in foreign patent and trademark offices, which could result in substantial cost and limitations on the scope or validity of our patents or trademarks.

 

Additionally, third parties, including our competitors or licensees, may seek to have our patents reviewed by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office in a post grant proceeding, such as post grant review or an inter parties review. Such proceedings, if instituted could cancel our patents or narrow the scope of our patent claims. We cannot predict the effect that such proceedings, if instituted, may have on our business or revenue received from licensing our patents.

 

In addition, foreign laws treat the protection of proprietary rights differently from laws in the United States. The failure of foreign laws or judicial systems to adequately protect our proprietary rights or intellectual property, including intellectual property developed on our behalf by foreign contractors or subcontractors, may have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, and financial results.

 

If our future products incorporate technologies that infringe the proprietary rights of third parties, and we do not secure licenses from them, we could be liable for substantial damages.

 

We are not aware that our current products infringe the intellectual property rights of any third parties. We also are not aware of any third partythird-party intellectual property rights that may hamper our ability to provide future products and services. However, we recognize that the development of our services or products may require that we acquire intellectual property licenses from third parties to avoid infringement of those parties’ intellectual property rights. These licenses may not be available at all or may only be available on terms that are not commercially reasonable. If third parties make infringement claims against us, whether or noteven if they are not upheld, such claims could:

 

 17

● consume substantial time and financial resources;
 
divert the attention of management from growing our business and managing operations; and
 
disrupt product sales and shipments.

 

If any third party prevails in an action against us for infringement of its proprietary rights, we could be required to pay damages and either enter into costly licensing arrangements or redesign our products so as to exclude any infringing use. As a result, we would incur substantial costs, delays in product development, sales and shipments, and our revenues may decline substantially. Additionally, we may not be able to achieve the minimum necessary growth for our continued success.

 

Failure to attract and retain management and other personnel may damage our operations and financial results and cause our stock price to decline.

 

We depend, to a significant degree, on the skills, experience and efforts of our executive officers and other key management, technical, finance, sales and other personnel. Our failure to attract, integrate, motivate and retain existing or additional personnel could disrupt or otherwise harm our operations and financial results. We do not carry key man life insurance policies covering any employees. The loss of services of certain of our key employees, an inability to attract or retain qualified personnel in the future, or delays in hiring additional personnel could delay the development of our business and could cause our stock price to decline.

 

Our share price may be volatile and could decline substantially

The market price of our common stock, like the price of shares of technology companies generally, has been and may continue to be volatile. From January 1, 2002 to March 21, 2018, the closing price of our common stock has varied from a high of $140.00 to a low of $0.82 per share, as reported on the NYSE MKT. Many factors may cause the market price for our common stock to decline, including:

15
 ● shortfalls in revenues, cash flows or continued losses from operations;
delays in development or roll-out of any of our products;
announcements by one or more competitors of new product acquisitions or technological innovations; and
unfavorable outcomes from outstanding litigation.

In addition, the stock market experiences extreme fluctuations in price and volume that particularly affect the market price of shares of technology companies, such as ours. These price and volume fluctuations are often unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the affected companies. Because of this volatility, we may fail to meet the expectations of our stockholders or of securities analysts and our stock price could decline as a result. Declines in our stock price for any reason, as well as broad-based market fluctuations or fluctuations related to our financial results or other developments, may adversely affect your ability to sell your shares at a price equal to or above the price at which you purchased them. Decreases in the price of our common stock may also lead to de-listing of our common stock.

 

We incur significant accounting and other control costs that impact our financial condition.

 

As a publicly traded corporation, we incur certain costs to comply with regulatory requirements. If regulatory requirements were to become more stringent or if controls thought to be effective later fail, we may be forced to make additional expenditures, the amounts of which could be material. Some of our competitors are privately owned, so their accounting and control costs could create a competitive advantage over us. Should our sales decline or if we are unsuccessful at increasing prices to cover higher expenditures for internal controls and audits, our costs associated with regulatory compliance will rise as a percentage of sales.

 

Securing government contracts typically involves a lengthy competitive bidding process. Often, unsuccessful bidders have the ability to challenge contract awards. Such challenges may increase costs, result in delays and risk the loss of the contract by the winning bidder. Protests or other delays related to material government contracts that may be awarded to us could result in revenue volatility. State and local government agency contracts may depend on the availability of matching funds from federal, state or local entities. State and local government agencies are subject to political, budgetary, purchasing and delivery constraints that may result in irregular revenue and operating results. Revenue volatility makes management of our business difficult. Outright loss of any material government contract through the protest process or otherwise, could significantly reduce our revenues.

18

We could be adversely affected by a negative audit by the U.S. government.

We, like other government contractors, are subject to various routine audits, reviews and investigations by U.S. government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency and various agency inspectors. These agencies review a contractor’s performance under its contracts, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and standards. Any costs found to be misclassified may be subject to repayment. If an audit or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or prohibition from doing business with the U.S. government.

Our business strategy exposes us to long sales and implementation cycles for our products.

Historically, some of our primary target customers have been government agencies and branches of the U.S. military, both of which require long sales and implementation cycles for products, which may result in a long period of time prior to revenue realization. The loss or significant reduction in government spending could limit our ability to obtain government contracts. These limitations, if significant, could significantly reduce our revenues. We will need to develop additional strategic relationships with large government contractors in order to successfully compete for government contracts. Should we lose or fail to develop these strategic relationships, we may not be able to implement our business strategy.

We cannot be certain that our backlog estimates will result in actual revenues in any particular fiscal period because our clients may modify or terminate projects or may decide not to exercise contract options.

Our backlog represents sales value of firm orders for products and services not yet delivered and, for long-term, executed contractual arrangements (contracts, subcontract and customer commitments), the estimated future sales value of product shipments, transactions processed and services to be provided over the term of the contractual arrangements, including anticipated renewal options. For contracts with indefinite quantities, our backlog is estimated based on current activity levels. Our backlog includes estimates of revenues, the receipt of which require future government appropriations, depend on option exercise by clients or are subject to contract modification or termination. At December 31, 2017, our backlog approximated $28,000. These estimates are based on our experience under such contracts and similar contracts, and we believe that such estimates are reasonable. If we do not realize a substantial amount of our backlog, as we presently anticipate, our operations could be harmed and future revenues could be significantly reduced.

Long lead times for the components used in certain products creates uncertainty in our supply chain and may prevent us from making required deliveries to our customers on time.

 

We rely exclusively on commercial off-the-shelf technology in manufacturing our products. The lead-time for ordering certain components used in our products and for the production of products can be lengthy. As a result, we must, from time to time, order products based on forecasted demand. If demand for products lags significantly behind forecasts, we may purchase more product than we can sell. Conversely, if demand exceeds forecasts, we may not have enough products to meet our obligations to our customers.

 

We obtain certain hardware and services, as well as some software applications, from a limited group of suppliers, and our reliance on these suppliers involves significant risks, including reduced control over quality and delivery schedules.

 

Any financial instability of our suppliers could result in having to find new suppliers. We may experience significant delays in manufacturing and deliveries of products and services to customers if we lose our sources or if supplies and services delivered from these sources are delayed. As a result, we may be required to incur additional development, manufacturing, and other costs to establish alternative supply sources. It may take several months to locate alternative suppliers, if required. We cannot predict whether we will be able to obtain replacement hardware within the required time frames at affordable costs, or at all. Any delays resulting from suppliers failing to deliver hardware or delays in obtaining alternative hardware, in sufficient quantities and of sufficient quality, or any significant increase in the cost of hardware from existing or alternative suppliers could result in delays on the shipment of product which, in turn, could result in the loss of customers we may not be able to successfully complete.

 

19

Our Defense ID®system relies on access to databases run by various government agencies. If these governmental agencies were to stop sharing data with us, the utility of the Defense ID system would be diminished and business would be damaged.

Currently, our Defense ID® system accesses over 100 separate databases run by various government and law enforcement agencies. We cannot be assured that each of these agencies will continue to cooperate with us. In the event that one or more of these agencies does not continue to provide access to these databases, the utility of the Defense ID® system may be diminished and, as a result, our sales could suffer.

Our Defense ID®system requires permission from each branch of the U.S. military in the form of an Authority to Operate (ATO). If an existing ATO is revoked, we would risk losing our ability to install our Defense ID®system at military bases.

It is our current understanding that our Defense ID® system requires authority to operate at each Defense Department installation. There are, however, several views within the Defense Department pertaining to authorizations and accreditations required for information technology systems. We continue to work with the Defense Department to clarify these requirements that generate uncertainty for Defense Department contractors.

Authority to operate is granted to each installation and requires the installation to expend resources in the authorization process. The time required for this process can be lengthy, given resource availability.

We cannot be assured that Defense Department installations will have the resources necessary to pursue their respective authorities to operate, or that the authority to operate can be granted in a timely manner. The results of this may include loss or delay of projected Defense ID sales.

Security breaches and other disruptions could potentially compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would be harmful to our businessbusiness.

 

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our customers, and personally identifiable information of our customers, their customers our employees, in our data centers and on our networks. The secure processing, maintenance, and transmission, when applicable, of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance, or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost, or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, potential liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties. This in turn could disrupt our operations and the services we provide to customers, damage our reputation, and potentially cause a loss of confidence in our products and service offerings, which could adversely affect our business and competitive position.

Our Defense ID®system manages private personal information and information related to sensitive government functions and a breach of the security systems protecting such information may result in a loss of suppliers or customers or result in litigation.

The protective security measures designed to protect sensitive information and contained in our products may not prevent all security breaches. Failure to prevent security breaches may disrupt our business, damage our reputation and expose us to litigation and liability. A party who is able to circumvent protective security measures used in these systems could misappropriate sensitive information or cause interruptions or otherwise damage our products, services and reputation as well as the property and privacy of customers. If unintended parties obtain sensitive data and information, or create bugs or viruses or otherwise sabotage the functionality of our products, we may receive negative publicity, incur liability to our customers or lose the confidence of our customers, any of which may cause the termination or modification of contracts. Further, our existing insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover losses and liabilities that may result from such events.

In addition, we may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by the occurrence of any such breaches. However, protective or remedial measures may not be available at a reasonable price or at all, or may not be entirely effective if commenced.

Future government regulation restricting the capture of information electronically stored on identification cards could adversely affect our business.

The Defense ID® system is designed to read, verify and capture information from identification cards. Currently, some jurisdictions have restrictions on what can be done with this information. Because issues of personal privacy continue to be a major topic of public policy debate, it is possible that, in the future, these or other jurisdictions may introduce similar or additional restrictions on capturing this information. Therefore, the implementation of unfavorable regulations or unfavorable interpretations of existing regulations by courts or regulatory bodies could require us to incur significant compliance costs, cause the development of the affected industry sectors to become impractical and reduce our revenues and potential revenues.

20

 

We are subject to risks associated with product failure and technological flaws.

 

Our products are complex and may contain undetected errors or result in failures when first introduced or when new versions are released. Despite vigorous product testing efforts and testing by current and potential customers, it is possible that errors will be found in a new product or enhancement after commercial shipments have commenced. The occurrence of product defects or errors could result in negative publicity, delays in product introduction and the diversion of resources to remedy defects and loss of or delay in industry acceptance or claims by customers against us and could cause us to incur additional costs, any one of which could adversely affect our business. Because of the risk of undetected error, we may be compelled to accept liability provisions that vary from our preferred contracting model in certain critical transactions. There is a risk that in certain contracts and circumstances we may not be successful in adequately minimizing product and related liabilities or that the protections negotiated will not ultimately be deemed enforceable.

We carry product liability insurance, but existing coverage may not be adequate to cover potential claims. The failure of our products to perform as promised could result in increased costs, lower margins, liquidated damage payment obligations and harm to our reputation.

 

We may not be able to keep up with rapid technological change.

 

The sectors for all our products are characterized by rapid technological advancements. Significant technological change could render existing technology obsolete. If we are unable to successfully respond to these developments, or do not respond in a cost-effective manner, our business, financial condition, and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.

Our percentage of revenues and customer concentration is significant.

Revenues from our ten largest customers accounted for 75% of total revenues in 2020 and 66% of total revenues in 2019. Two customers accounted for 41% of revenues in 2020 and three customers accounted for 39% of revenues in 2019. Our loss of one or more significant customers could have a significant adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock and the Market for Our Common Stock

Our share price may be volatile and could decline substantially.

The market price of our common stock, like the price of shares of technology companies generally, has been and may continue to be volatile. From January 1, 2002 to March 26, 2021, the closing price of our common stock has varied from a high of $140.00 to a low of $0.82 per share, as reported on The Nasdaq Stock Market. Many factors may cause the market price for our common stock to decline, including:

shortfalls in revenues, cash flows or continued losses from operations;
delays in development or roll-out of any of our products;

economic and social effects of the COVID-19 virus or other pandemics;

short selling or other market manipulation activities;

announcements by one or more competitors of new product acquisitions or technological innovations; and

unfavorable outcomes from outstanding litigation.

In addition, the stock market experiences extreme fluctuations in price and volume, which was heightened as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, that particularly affect the market price of shares of technology companies, such as ours. These price and volume fluctuations are often unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the affected companies. Because of this volatility, we may fail to meet the expectations of our stockholders or of securities analysts and our stock price could decline as a result. Furthermore, the trading price of our common stock may be adversely affected by third-parties trying to drive down the market price. Short sellers and others, some of whom post anonymously on social media, may be positioned to profit if our stock declines and their activities can negatively affect our stock price. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. Declines in our stock price for any reason, as well as broad-based market fluctuations or fluctuations related to our financial results or other developments, may adversely affect your ability to sell your shares at a price equal to or above the price at which you purchased them. Decreases in the price of our common stock may also lead to de-listing of our common stock.

17

 

Future capital requirements may require incurring debt or dilution of existing stockholders.

 

Acquisition and development opportunities and other contingencies may arise, which could require us to raise additional capital or incur debt. If we raise additional capital through the sale of equity, including preferred stock, or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our then existing stockholders will be diluted.

 

Because we do not intend to pay dividends on our Common Stock, stockholders will benefit from an investment in our stock only if it appreciates in value.

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our shares of stock. We currently intend to retain all future earnings, if any, for use in the operations and expansion of the business. As a result, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on factors the Board of Directors deems relevant, including among others, our results of operations, financial condition and cash requirements, business prospects, and the terms of our credit facilities and other financing arrangements. Accordingly, realization of a gain on stockholders’ investments will depend on the appreciation of the price of our stock. There is no guarantee that our stock will appreciate in value.appreciate.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

Not applicable.

21

Item 2.Properties

Item 2. Properties

 

Our corporate headquarters is currently located in Melville, New York, where we occupy approximately 3,825700 square feet of office space pursuant to a lease that expires on February 28, 2021. Many administrative and technicalmonth-to-month lease. While all personnel for all product divisions are based at this location, with a certain numbercurrently operate out of individuals operating out oftheir individual home offices throughout the country.country, this facility will be primarily used for employee use and for necessary physical meetings. We believe that our existing facility is adequate to meet current requirements and that additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate any expansion of operations.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

We are not currently involved in any legal or regulatory proceeding, or arbitration, the outcome of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our business.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

None

 

1822
 

 

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

(a) Our common stock is traded on the NYSE MKTThe Nasdaq Stock ExchangeMarket under the symbol “IDN.” The following table indicates high and low sales prices for the periods indicated.

 

 Low High  Low  High 
           
2016     
2019        
First quarter $0.85  $1.60  $2.10  $3.55 
Second quarter $1.38  $2.14  $3.28  $6.25 
Third quarter $1.27  $1.80  $4.01  $5.95 
Fourth quarter $1.55  $2.84  $4.75  $8.04 
                
2017        
2020        
First quarter $1.98  $3.10  $2.75  $10.15 
Second quarter $2.78  $4.20  $2.11  $7.80 
Third quarter $2.42  $3.84  $6.01  $8.35 
Fourth quarter $2.11  $3.05  $6.86  $11.41 
                
2018        
2021        
First quarter* $2.13  $2.87  $8.02  $15.01 

 

* Portion of first fiscal quarter through March 21, 2018.

* Portion of first fiscal quarter through March 26, 2021.

 

(b) As of March 21, 2018,26, 2021, there were 18930 shareholders of record of our common stock.

 

(c) No cash dividends or other cash distributions made by us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Future dividend policy will be determined by our Board of Directors based on our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other then existing conditions. It is anticipated that cash dividends will not be paid to the holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future.

 

(d)Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2017,2020, with respect to the shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.

 

Plan Category Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights (a)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights (b)
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
  Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights (a)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights (b)
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)  1,637,217  $1.36   878,425   905,578  $4.10   1,191,445 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  

N/A

  $

N/A

   

N/A

      $N/A   N/A 
Total  1,637,217  $1.36   878,425   905,578  $4.10   1,191,445 

 

(1) Represents 1,514,872637,882 options, 1,754 restricted stock units and 5,859 restricted265,942 performance stock units under the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, 115,256 options under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and 1,250 options under the 2003 Stock Option Plan.

(e)Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

None.

 

23

(f)Repurchases of Equity Securities

 

There were no shares purchased during 2017.2020.

(g)Reverse Stock Split

Effective on August 12, 2014 and commencing with the opening of trading on August 13, 2014, we effected a reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at a ratio of one-for-eight, with each eight (8) issued and outstanding shares of the common stock automatically combined and converted into one (1) issued and outstanding share of the common stock. The reverse stock split was approved by stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding voting power at a special meeting of stockholders held on August 12, 2014.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

 

The following selected financial data presented under the captions “Statement of Operations Data” and “Balance Sheet Data” as of the end of each of the five years ended December 31, 2017,2020, are derived from our financial statements. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, the accompanying notes and the report of independent registered public accounting firms thereon, which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and our former wholly owned subsidiaries, Mobilisa and Positive Access.

 

 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Statement of Operations Data:                               
Revenue $7,298  $6,613  $7,015  $3,839  $3,598 
Loss from operations  (2,424)  (7,645)  (5,480)  (5,750)  (6,080)
Net loss  (2,424)  (7,644)  (5,334)  (5,735)  (6,021)
Net loss per common share                    
Revenues $3,839  $3,598  $4,433  $7,664  $10,735 
(Loss) from operations  (5,750)  (6,080)  (4,093)  (2,648)  (260)
Net (loss) income  (5,735)  (6,021)  (3,964)  (2,549)  558 
Net (loss) income per common share                    
Basic  (0.70)  (1.59)  (0.55)  (0.58)  (0.48)  (0.58)  (0.48)  (0.26)  (0.16)  0.03 
Diluted  (0.70)  (1.59)  (0.55)  (0.58)  (0.48)  (0.58)  (0.48)  (0.26)  (0.16)  0.03 
Common shares used in computing per share amounts                                        
Basic  3,487   4,801   9,658   9,915   12,429   9,915   12,429   15,542   15,792   17,324 
Diluted  3,487   4,801   9,658   9,915   12,429   9,915   12,429   15,542   15,792   18,021 

 

 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Balance sheet data:                                        
Cash and cash equivalents $224  $2,966  $5,953  $3,092  $8,010 
Cash $3,092  $8,010  $4,376  $3,351  $13,121 
Working capital  (720)  1,880   5,659   2,471   7,340   2,471   7,340   4,244   3,178   13,462 
Total assets  17,902   15,814   18,473   14,534   17.882   14,534   17,882   14,461   13,997   24,340 
Total liabilities  2,546   2,666   2,146   1,598   1,873   1,598   1,873   1,541   2,248   2,129 
Stockholders’ equity  15,356   13,148   16,326   12,935   16,009   12,935   16,009   12,920   11,750   22,211 

 

2024
 

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Overview

 

We are a prominent technology company that is engaged in developing, integrating and marketing identity authentication systems for various applications includingand threat identification solutions to address challenges that include bank and retail fraud prevention, law enforcement threat identification, and mobile and handheld access control and integrated systemssecurity for the government, military and commercial markets. Our products driven by our ID Check Authentication Engine, include ID-Check, Retail IDID®, a solution for preventing fraud in the retail and banking industry for both on-line and in-store transactions; Age IDID®, a patented technology that instantly reads, analyzes, and verifies encoded data in magnetic stripes and barcodes on government-issue IDs from U.S. and Canadian jurisdictions designedsmartphone or tablet-based solution for preventing sale of age-restricted products to improve the customer experience for the financial, hospitality and retail sectorsminors, and Defense ID®ID®, a mobile and Law ID systems, advanced ID cardfixed infrastructure solution for threat identification, identity authentication and access control products currently protectingto military bases and federal locations.other government and commercial facilities.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and the Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements include impairment consideration and valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, deferred tax valuation allowances, allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue allocation of multi-element arrangements and the fair value of stock options granted under our stock-based compensation plans. Due to the inherent uncertainties involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be different from those estimates.

 

We believe that there are several accounting policies that are critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these policies affect the reported amounts of revenue and the more significant areas involving management’s judgments and estimates. These significant accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, stock basedstock-based compensation, deferred taxes, goodwill and intangible asset valuation and impairment, and commitments and contingencies. These policies and our procedures related to these policies are described in detail below.

 

Valuation of goodwill and other long-lived assets

 

Our long-lived assets include property and equipment, goodwill, and intangible assets. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the balances of property and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, all net of accumulated depreciation and amortization and impairments, were $211,602,$138,870, $8,101,661 and $463,578,$482,591, respectively. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the balances of property and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, all net of accumulated depreciation and amortization and impairments, were $270,776,$181,731, $8,101,661 and $2,154,563,$174,237, respectively.

 

We depreciate property and equipment and amortize intangible assets that have finite lives over their estimated useful lives. For purposes of determining whether there are any impairment losses, as further discussed below, management evaluates the carrying amounts of identifiable long-lived tangible and intangible assets, including their estimated useful lives, when indicators of impairment are present as more fully described below. Based on our review of the carrying amounts of the long-lived tangible and intangible assets with finite lives, we may also determine that shorter estimated useful lives are appropriate. In that event, we record depreciation and amortization over shorter future periods, which would reduce our earnings.

 

Goodwill

 

The excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the assets of the acquired businesses is considered goodwill. Under authoritative guidance, purchased goodwill is not amortized, but rather it is periodically reviewed for impairment. We had goodwill of $8,101,661 atas of December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. This goodwill resulted from the acquisition of Mobilisa, Inc. and Positive Access Corporation.

25

These entities were merged into one company under Intellicheck on December 31, 2018.

For the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we performed our annual impairment test of goodwill in the fourth quarter. Under authoritative guidance, we can use industry and Company specific qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that impairment exists, before using a two-step quantitative analysis. Events or changes in circumstances which could trigger an impairment review include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, other entity specific events and sustained decrease in share price. We performed the first step of the goodwill impairment test in order to identify potential impairment by comparing our fair value of the Company to our carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value was determined using the weighting of certain valuation techniques, including both income and market approaches which include a discounted cash flow analysis, an estimation of an implied control premium, in addition to oursimilar public company financial comparisons, along with market capitalization on the measurement date. The implied control premium selected was developed based on certain observable market data of comparable companies.capitalization. The market capitalization is sensitive to the volatility of our stock price. Although we believe that the factors considered in the impairment analysis are reasonable, changes in any one of the assumptions used could have produced a different result which may have led to an impairment charge. Any future impairment loss could have a material adverse effect on our long-term assets and operating expenses in the period in which impairment is determined to exist.

 

For the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we determined that the fair value was more than our carrying amount and therefore the second step of the goodwill impairment test was not required.

 

Intangible Assets

 

IntangibleOur intangible assets include trade names,consist of patents and non-contractual customer relationshipsa software license as described more fully in Note 5. We use the straight-line method to amortize these assets over their estimated useful lives. We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be fully recoverable in accordance with ASCAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360. To determine recoverability of its long-lived assets, we evaluate the probability that future undiscounted net cash flows, without interest charges, will be less than the carrying amount of the assets. Impairment is measured at fair value.

As a result of a projected loss of revenue from certain customers moving to another platform along with a shift in our marketing strategy for 2018, we performed a quantitative impairment test as of December 31, 2017 for the patents, trade names and customer relationships acquired in the Mobilisa acquisition.  We utilized the income approach to test our patent and tradenames, specifically the Relief-from-Royalty method, which assumes that a user of that intangible asset would have to make a stream of payments to the owner of the asset in return for the rights to use that asset.  By acquiring the intangible asset, the user avoids these payments.  As a result of the analysis, $250,582 and $287,928, respectively, of impairment was recorded due to the decline in the valuation of tradenames and patents. We utilized the income approach to test our customer relationships, specifically the Multi-Period Excess Earnings Method, which estimates the cash flows attributable to the customer relationships, after considering the return associated with other contributing assets.  As a result of the analysis, $836,912 of impairment was recorded due to the decline in the valuation of the customer relationships. Application of the impairment test requires judgement, including determination of royalty rates, and projecting revenue attributable to the assets in order to determine fair value.  These impairments, totaling $1,375,422, are recorded as Impairment of Intangible Assets on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. No impairments were recognized during the yearyears ended December 31, 2016.2020 and 2019.

 

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue

 

Revenue is generally recognized when persuasive evidenceMost license fees and service revenues are generated from a combination of fixed-price and per-scan contracts. Under the per-scan revenue model, customers are charged a fee each time the customer scans an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred,identity document, such as a driver’s license, with our software. Under the fixed-price revenue model customers are charged a fixed monthly fee is fixed and determinable, collectability is probable, and there is no future Company involvementeither per device or commitment. We sellphysical business location to access our commercial products directly through its sales force and through distributors. Revenue from direct salessoftware. In certain instances, customization services are determined to be essential to the functionality of productsthe delivered software. Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized when shippeda customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. We measure revenue based on the consideration specified in a customer arrangement, and revenue is recognized when the performance obligations in an arrangement are satisfied. A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct service to the customer. The transaction price of a contract is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when or as, the customer receives the benefit of the performance obligation. Customers typically receive the benefit of our services as they are performed. Substantially all customer contracts provide that we are compensated for services performed to date.

Invoicing is based on schedules established in customer contracts. Payment terms are generally established from 30 to 60 days from the invoice date. Product returns are recorded as a reduction to revenue.

Revenue is measured based on a consideration specified in a contract with a customer, and excludes any sales incentives and amounts collected on behalf of third parties. Revenues are recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to the customer, and title has passed.

Underin an amount that reflects the provisions of ASC Topic 605-25, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” for multi-element arrangements that include tangible products containing software essential to the tangible product’s functionality and undelivered software elements relating to the tangible product’s essential software,consideration we allocate revenue to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, we use a hierarchy to determine the selling priceexpect to be usedentitled to in exchange for allocatingthose goods or services. Furthermore, we recognize revenue to deliverables: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price and (iii) best estimate of the selling price (“ESP”). VSOE generally exists only when we sell the deliverable separately and is the price actually chargedsatisfy a performance obligation by us for that deliverable. ESPs reflect our best estimates of what the selling prices of elements would be if they were sold regularly ontransferring control over a stand-alone basis.

We also recognize revenues from licensing of its patented softwareproduct or service to customers. The licensed software requires continuing service or post contractual customer support and performance; accordingly, a portion of the revenue is deferred based on its fair value and recognized ratably over the period in which the future service, support and performance are provided, which is generally one to three years.

Revenue from research and development contracts are generally with government agencies under long-term cost-plus fixed-fee contracts, where revenue is based on time and material costs incurred. Revenue from these arrangements is recognized as time is spent on the contract and materials are purchased. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

26

We also perform consulting work for other companies. These services are billed based on time and materials. Revenue from these arrangements is also recognized as time is spent on the contract and materials are purchased.

Subscriptions to database information can be purchased for month-to-month, one, two, and three-year periods. Revenue from subscriptions are deferred and recognized over the contractual period, which is typically three years.

We offer enhanced extended warranties for its sales of hardware and software at a set price. The revenue from these sales are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual period, which is typically one to three years.customer.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

We account for the issuance of equity awards to employees in accordance with ASC Topic 718, and 505, which requires that the cost resulting from all share basedshare-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. This pronouncement establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share based payment arrangements and requires all companies to apply a fair value basedvalue-based measurement method in accounting for all share basedshare-based payment transactions with employees.

 

22

Deferred Income Taxes

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and net operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using expected tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We have recorded a full valuation allowance for our net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, due to the uncertainty of the realizability of those assets.

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

We are not currently involved in any legal or regulatory proceeding, or arbitration, the outcome of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

The above listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

 

Results of Operations (All figures were rounded to the nearest $1,000)

 

COMPARISON OF THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172020

TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162019

 

REVENUEREVENUES. Total revenues were approximately 6% lower inRevenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 as2020 increased 40% to $10,735,000 compared to $7,664,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  % Change 
Identity Systems $3,584,000  $3,825,000   (6)%
Other  14,000   14,000   0%
  $3,598,000  $3,839,000   (6)%

2019. The decreaseincrease in the Identity Systems revenues in 20172020 is a primarily the result of lowerhigher commercial and Defense ID® sales.

27

AsSoftware as a Service (“SaaS”) revenues. SaaS revenues, which consists of software licensed on a subscription basis, increased $3,271,000 or 54% to $9,373,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, our backlog, which represents non-cancelable sales orders2020 compared to $6,102,000 for products not yet shipped and services to be performed, was approximately $28,000. As ofthe year ended December 31, 2016, our backlog was approximately $133,000. Period to period comparisons may not be indicative of future operating results, since we still face long sales cycles, and therefore, we cannot predict with certainty in which period the opportunities currently in the pipeline will develop into sales or if they will develop at all.2019.

 

GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased by $6,000$2,641,000 to $3,076,000$9,309,000 for the year ended December 31, 20172020 from $3,070,000$6,668,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. Our gross profit, as a percentage of revenues, was 85%86.7% and 80%87.0% in 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The decrease in percentage is primarily due to an increase in percentage in 2017 is due to higher revenues onhardware sales which contain lower margins offset by our continued growth of our SaaS model and less equipment sales that typically have a lower margin.revenue.

 

OPERATING EXPENSES. Operating expenses, which consist of selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses, and an impairment charge on our intangible assets, increased by $337,000$252,000 or 4%3% to $9,157,000$9,568,000 for the year ended December 31, 20172020 from $8,820,000$9,316,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 9%increased 4% to $5,865,000$5,893,000 for the year ended December 31, 20172020 from $6,414,000$5,659,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as a result of lower stock-based compensation2019. This increase is primarily due to higher personnel costs offset by a net increase on the impact of severance costs in both periods.and accrued incentive plans. Research and development expenses decreased 20%increased less than 1% to $1,916,000$3,675,000 for the year ended December 31, 20172020 from $2,406,000$3,657,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, due to decreased use of specialized consulting firms for certain research and development projects.2019.An impairment charge

GAIN ON FORGIVENESS ON UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE. A gain on our intangible assetsthe forgiveness on an unsecured promissory note was $1,375,000$796,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. This impairment charge is fully described in Critical Accounting Policies andwas the Useresult of Estimates.

the forgiveness on a note under the Paycheck Protection Program administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration.

 

INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME. Interest and other income was $60,000were $22,000 for the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to $15,000$99,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

 

INCOME TAXES. We have incurredhad taxable net losses to date;through the years ended December 31, 2020; therefore, we have paid nominal income taxes.

NET LOSSINCOME (LOSS). As a result of the factors noted above, we incurred ahad net lossincome of $6,021,000$558,000 for the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to a net loss of $5,735,000$2,549,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources (All figures were rounded to the nearest $1,000)

 

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had cash of $8,010,000,$13,121,000, working capital (defined as current assets minus current liabilities) of $7,340,000,$13,462,000, total assets of $17,882,000$24,340,000 and stockholders’ equity of $16,009,000.$22,211,000.

 

During 2017,For the year ended December 31, 2020, our cash increased by $4,918,000.$9,771,000. Cash used in operating activities was $3,745,000 in 2017$19,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to cash used in operating activities of $4,240,000 in 2016.$1,841,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. We generatedused cash of $5,000 from$416,000 in investing activities during 2017for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to cash usedprovided by investing activities of $28,000 in 2016.$22,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Cash generated inby financing activities was $8,658,000 in 2017$10,205,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to $1,408,000 in 2016 as a result of higher capital raising in 2017.$794,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

On August 4, 2017,June 23, 2020, we completed a public offering of 4,168,7501,769,230 shares of itsour common stock, offered to the public at $2.25$6.50 per share. NetOur net proceeds from this offering were approximately $8,670,000 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions paid by the Company. Direct offering costs totaling approximately $157,000 were recorded as a reduction to the net proceeds on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.

On June 15, 2016, we completed a public offering of 1,200,000 shares of our common stock and five-year warrants to purchase 600,000 shares with an exercise price of $2.20 per share, at a combined public offering of $1.75 per share and half-warrant. Net proceeds from this offering were approximately $1,902,000$10,710,000 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us. Direct offering costs totaling approximately $124,000$141,000 were recorded as a reduction to the net proceeds and included in additional paid-in-capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity. As part of the offering, there was an overallotment option for the underwriters to purchase up to 180,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.63 per share. Through December 31, 2017, certain warrant holders exercised their right to purchase 216,500 shares of our common stock which resulted in net proceeds of approximately $476,000.

28

On February 24, 2016, we entered into a stock repurchase agreement with two former directors, who were also members of management (the “Former Executives”) for the repurchase of all 979,114 shares owned by the Former Executives of our common stock for $1,096,608. The transaction was finalized on March 4, 2016.

 

On August 31, 2015,February 6, 2019, we sold our wireless enterprise assets to the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe (the “Buyer”) for total consideration of $350,000 which consists of an upfront cash payment of $30,000, the issuance ofentered a promissory note totaling $200,000 and contingent consideration up to a maximum of $120,000 based on future earnings. We recognized a gain on the sale of approximately $109,000 which is included in interest and other income for the year ended December 31, 2015. Total assets disposed include certain trade names associated with the wireless assets with a net book value of approximately $65,000 and certain fixed assets with a net book value of approximately $56,000. Any gain on contingent consideration will be recognized as it is earned. Under the terms of the promissory note, monthly payments in the amount of $3,683 including principal and interest at 4%, are to be made over a 60-month term expiring in August 2020. At December 31, 2017, the total note receivable was $111,609, of which $40,471 and $71,138 is included in Other Current Assets and Notes Receivable, net of current portion, respectively on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On May 22, 2017, the Company entered into revolving credit facility with Northwest Bank (“Northwest”) and simultaneously terminated its revolving credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank. This new agreementCitibank that allows for borrowings up to the lesser of (i) $2,000,000 or (ii) 95% of the collateralized balance in the Company’s money marketour existing fixed income investment account less $250,000. The borrowings are secured by the Company’s existing deposit and money market accounts with Northwest.Citibank. The facility bears interest at a rate consistent with Northwest’s money market account (0.65%of Citibank’s Base Rate (4.75% at December 31, 2017) plus 3%.2020) minus 2% subject to certain limitations. Interest is payable monthly and the principal is due upon maturity on May 22, 2018. Asas of December 31, 2017,2020, there were no amounts outstanding under this facility and unused availability under this facility was $2,000,000.

We are closely monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of our business and including how it may impact our customers, employees and vendors. We did incur disruptions during the year ended December 31, 2020 from COVID-19 and we are unable to predict the impact that this pandemic will have on us going forward, including our financial position, results of operations and cash flows, the impact on our customers and the related demand for our services due to numerous uncertainties.

On April 9, 2020 we entered into an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $796,100 (the “Note”) with First Bank (the “Loan Servicer”) under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration and established as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). We received these proceeds on April 14, 2020 plus an additional $10,000 advance under the Economic Injury Disaster Loan program (“EIDL”) on April 15, 2020. Under the terms of the Note, we can apply for forgiveness on this Note with the Loan Servicer if certain conditions including the use of the Note proceeds are met over a 24-week period commencing from the date of the Note. The Note has an interest rate of 1%. We have not imputed interest on the Note as the rate is determined to be a below-market rate due to the scope exception in ASC 835-30-15-3(e) for government-mandated interest rates. In November 2020, we received notification from the Loan Servicer that the Note was fully forgiven and recorded income from the extinguishment of our obligation as we were legally released from being the primary obligor in accordance with ASC 405-20-40-1.

We repaid our EIDL advance on December 7, 2020.On December 27, 2020, Congress passed the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits and Venues Act (“the Economic Aid Act”) which relieves companies of their obligations to repay EIDL advances. As a result of this ruling, the SBA returned this advance, plus interest to the Loan Servicer on February 18, 2021, which was immediately returned to us.

 

We currently anticipate that our available cash, as well as cash from the previously mentioned stock offerings, and expected cash from operations and availability under the revolving credit agreement, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.

months from the date of filing.

We keep the option open to raise additional funds to respond to business contingencies which may include the need to fund more rapid expansion, fund additional marketing expenditures, develop new markets for our technology, enhance our operating infrastructure, respond to competitive pressures, or acquire complementary businesses or necessary technologies. There can be no assurance that we will be able to secure the additional funds when needed or obtain such on terms satisfactory to us, if at all.

 

We have filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which became effective July 19, 2010. Under the shelf registration statement, we may offer and sell, from time to time in the future in one or more public offerings, our common stock, preferred stock, warrants, and units. The aggregate initial offering price of all securities sold by us will not exceed $25,000,000, and, pursuant to SEC rules, we may only sell up to one-third of the market cap held by non-affiliate stockholders in any 12-month period. We renewed this registration statement with the SEC on July 31, 2013June 1, 2020 and it was declared effective August 6, 2013. We renewed this registration statement with the SEC on October 21, 2016 and it was declared effective NovemberJune 4, 2016.2020.

 

The specific terms of any future offering, including the prices and use of proceeds, will be determined at the time of any such offering and will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement which will be filed with the SEC at the time of the offering.

 

The shelf registration statement is designed to give us the flexibility to access additional capital at some point in the future when market conditions are appropriate.

 

We are not currently involved in any legal or regulatory proceeding, or arbitration, the outcome of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

29

Adjusted EBITDA

 

We use Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP financial performance measurement. Adjusted EBITDA is calculated by adding back toadjusting net lossincome (loss) for certain reductions such as gains on debt forgiveness and interest and other income and certain addbacks such as income taxes, impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill, depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA is provided to investors to supplement the results of operations reported in accordance with GAAP. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides an additional tool for investors to use in comparing our financial results with other companies that also use Adjusted EBITDA in their communications to investors. By excluding non-cash charges such as impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill, amortization, depreciation and stock-based compensation, as well as non-operating charges for interest and income taxes, investors can evaluate our operations and can compare its results on a more consistent basis to the results of other companies. In addition, adjusted EBITDA is one of the primary measures management uses to monitor and evaluate financial and operating results.

 

We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be an important indicator of our operational strength and performance of our business and a useful measure of our historical operating trends. However, there are significant limitations to the use of Adjusted EBITDA since it excludes gains on debt forgiveness, interest income and expense,other income, impairments of long livedlong-lived assets and goodwill, stock basedstock-based compensation expense, all of which impact our profitability, as well as depreciation and amortization related to the use of long termlong-term assets which benefit multiple periods. We believe that these limitations are compensated by providing Adjusted EBITDA only with GAAP net lossincome (loss) and clearly identifying the difference between the two measures. Consequently, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net lossincome (loss) presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA as defined us may not be comparable with similarly named measures provided by other entities.

A reconciliation of GAAP net lossincome (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA follows:

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  (Unaudited) 
  2017  2016 
       
Net loss $(6,020,505) $(5,734,681)
Reconciling items:        
Interest and other, net  (59,841)  (14,930)
Depreciation and amortization  412,351   434,291 
Stock-based compensation costs  435,679   935,899 
Impairment of intangible assets  1,375,422   - 
         
Adjusted EBITDA $(3,856,894) $(4,379,421)

Related Party Transactions

30

Our subsidiary, Mobilisa, Inc. leased office space from a company (“Lessor Company”) that is wholly-owned by the Executives ending in 2017. The base annual rent for this facility was $96,010 was subject to annual increases based on the increase in the CPI index plus 1%. On February 24, 2016, Mobilisa and the Lessor Company entered into a lease amendment agreement reducing the space under this lease that took effect on March 31, 2016 thereby closing the office facility and occupied storage space that expired on December 31, 2016. As a result of this amended agreement, we made a $100,000 termination payment to the Lessor in full satisfaction of our remaining obligations under the original lease. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, total rent payments for this facility were $0 and $124,001 (including this termination payment), respectively.

On February 24, 2016, we entered into a stock repurchase agreement with these Executives for the repurchase of all 979,114 shares of our common stock owned by the Executives for $1,096,608. The transaction was finalized on March 4, 2016.

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
       
Net income (loss) $558,397  $(2,548,711)
Reconciling items:        
Gain on forgiveness of unsecured promissory note  (796,100)  - 
Interest and other income  (21,948)  (99,059)
Depreciation and amortization  179,405   249,895 
Stock-based compensation expense  409,477   584,865 
         
Adjusted EBITDA $329,231  $(1,813,010)

 

Net Operating Loss Carry Forwards

 

In March 2016, we completed an Internal Revenue Code Section 382 study which determined that a cumulative three-year ownership change in excess of 50% had occurred in March 2016 due to a share repurchase; see “Recent Developments.” As a result, ourOur available net operating loss (“NOL”) was reduced from $47.4 million to $2.2 million during the first quarter of 2016. Our available NOL at December 31, 20172020 was approximately $11$17 million. The federal and state NOLs are available to offset future taxable income and expire from 20172021 through 20362039 if not utilized.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Below is a table, which presents our contractual obligations and commitments atas of December 31, 2017:2020:

 

 Payments Due by Period  Payments Due by Period 
    Less than       More than     Less than       More than 
 Total  1 year  1-3 years  3-5 years  5 years  Total  1 year  1-3 years  3-5 years  5 years 
                               
Operating Leases $328,647  $143,752  $170,414  $14,481  $  -  $32,892  $32,892  $-  $-  $- 
Consulting Agreements  -   -   -   -   - 
Purchase Obligations  -   -   -   -   - 
Total Contractual Obligations $328,647  $143,752  $170,414  $14,481  $-  $32,892  $32,892  $-  $-  $- 

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Effective

 

Except as discussed below, we do not expect the impact of the future adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In May 2014,December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP.for Income Taxes” as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in the accounting standards. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. In addition, this guidance requires new or expanded disclosuresstandard eliminates certain exceptions related to the judgments made by companies when following this framework and additional quantitative disclosures regarding contract balances and remaining performance obligations. ASU No. 2014-09 may be applied using either a full retrospective approach under which all years includedfor intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in the financial statements will be presented under the revised guidance, or a modified retrospective approach, under which financial statements will be prepared under the revised guidance for the year of adoption, but not for prior years. Under the latter method, entities will recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at the effective date for contracts that still require performance by the entity.

31

On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 foran interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date. ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. We developed an implementation plan to adopt this new guidance, which included an assessment of the impact of the new guidance on our financial position and results of operations. We have completed our assessment and have determined that this standard will have no material impact on its financial position or results of operations, except enhanced disclosure regarding revenue recognition, including disclosures of revenue streams, performance obligations, variable considerationperiod and the related judgmentsrecognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The standard also clarifies and estimates necessary to apply the new standard. On January 1, 2018, we adopted the new accounting standard ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and for all open contracts and related amendments as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 will be presented under ASC 606, while the comparative information will not be restated and will continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.

On January 1, 2017, we adopted ASU No. 2016-09,Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting which simplifies severalother aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards, forfeitures and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 allows us to make an accounting policy election to either estimate forfeitures or account for forfeitures as they occur. We have elected to account for forfeitures as they occur andtaxes. The standard is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis. As a result, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to accumulated deficit and additional paid-in-capital in the amount of $33,894 as of January 1, 2017 on the consolidated balance sheet.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11,Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory(“ASU 2015-11”) which changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The new guidance must be applied on a prospective basis and was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with2020 and early adoption permitted. Though we adopted this amendment on January 1, 2017, ASU 2015-17 had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,Income Taxes (Topic 740):Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxeswhich simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by eliminating the separate classification of deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in the consolidated balance sheet. The amendments in the update require that all deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in the consolidated balance sheet. The amendments in this update were effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein and may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. Though we adopted this amendment on January 1, 2017, ASU 2015-17 had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements as all deferred tax assets and liabilities have a full valuation allowance.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,Leases, which requires that lease arrangements longer than 12 months’ result in an entity recognizing an asset and liability. The pronouncement is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance is expected to have on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Clarification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments which would eliminate the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows, by adding or clarifying guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for public entities with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented, unless deemed impracticable, in which case, prospective application is permitted. We do not expect the implementation of this standard towill have a material effectimpact on our consolidated financial statements.

32

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact ofdetermined this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017,June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09,2016-13, Compensation-Stock CompensationFinancial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 718)326): ScopeMeasurement of Modification AccountingCredit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2017-09”) which clarifies when changes to measure credit losses on financial instruments, including trade receivables. The guidance eliminates the terms or conditionsprobable initial recognition threshold that was previously required prior to recognizing a credit loss on financial instruments. The credit loss estimate can now reflect an entity’s current estimate of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. ASU 2017-09 will reduce diversity in practice and result in fewer changes toall future expected credit losses. Under the terms of an award being accounted for as modifications. Under ASU 2017-09,previous guidance, an entity will not apply modification accounting to a share-based payment award if the award’s fair value, vesting conditionsonly considered past events and classification as an equity or liability instrument are the same immediately before and after the change. ASU 2017-09 will be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date.current conditions. The guidance is effective for annual periods, andsmaller reporting companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those annual periods,fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We are in the process2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of evaluating the impactcertain amendments of this guidance must be applied on a modified retrospective basis and the adoption of the remaining amendments must be applied on a prospective basis. We do not expect this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have never entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements and have never established any special purpose entities. We have not guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities or entered into any options on non-financial assets.

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, particularly statements anticipating future growth in revenues, loss from operations and cash flow. Words such as “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes” and words and terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs about future events. As with any projection or forecast, they are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and changes in circumstances, and the Company is under no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking statements whether as a result of such changes, new information, subsequent events or otherwise.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Financial instruments, which subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents.cash. We maintain cash between threein one financial institutions. The marketable securities and short-term investments are invested in money market funds and bank certificates of deposit.institution. We perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these institutions.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Our financial statements and supplementary data are attached hereto beginning on Page F-1.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

 

There have been no changes in or disagreements with our principal independent registered public accounting firm for the two-year period ended December 31, 2017.2020.

33

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer evaluated, with the participation of our management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As of December 31, 2017,2020, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15I, were effective.

Our disclosure controls and procedures have been formulated to ensure (i) that information that we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 were recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) that the information required to be disclosed by us is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Annual Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) for the Company. Management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172020 (the end of our fiscal year), based on the framework and criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2020.

Item 9B.Other Information

Item 9B. Other Information

 

None.

PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our 20182021 definitive Proxy Statement (which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 20172020 in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders) (“20182021 Proxy Statement”) under the captions “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors,” “Other Information – Executive Officers,” and “Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.”

Item 11.Executive Compensation

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our 20182021 Proxy Statement under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation.”

34

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our 20182021 Proxy Statement under the captions “Other Information—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Other Information – Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our 20182021 Proxy Statement under the captions “Other Information – Related Party Transactions Overview,” “Other Information – Certain Transactions with Related Persons” and “Director Attributes and Independence.”

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our 20182021 Proxy Statement under the caption “Proposal 2 – Ratification of the Selection of Independent Auditors.”

 

PART IV

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

 (a)(1)Financial Statements

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019

 

 (b)Exhibits

 

Exhibit No. Description
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (1)
3.2 Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (11)(7)
3.3 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (8)(4)
3.4 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (5)
3.5Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (12)(8)
4.1 Specimen Stock Certificate (7)(3)
10.1Agreement of Lease between the Company and 535 Realty Management Corp., dated as of December 27, 2017**
10.2 1998 Stock Option2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (1)(9) *
10.3 1999 Stock Option Plan (1) *Bill White Severance Agreement (6)
10.4 2001 Stock Option Plan (2) *
10.52003 Stock Option Plan (3) *
10.62006 Equity Incentive Plan (5) *
10.72015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (13) *
10.8Bill Roof Chief Executive OfficerBryan Lewis Employment Agreement (9) (7)*
10.9Bill White Severance Agreement (9) *
10.10Bill Roof Separation and Consulting Agreement dated November 2, 2017 **
10.14Fourth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2014, by and between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank (10)
14.1 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (6)(2)
21List of Subsidiaries (7)
23.1 Consent of EisnerAmper LLP **

35

31.1 Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **
31.2 Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **
32 Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **
101.INS XBRL Instance Document **
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema **
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase **
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase **
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase **
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase **

 

*Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
**Filed herewith.
(1)Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-87797) filed September 24, 1999.
(2)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed May 31, 2001.
(3)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed June 13, 2003.
(4)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 10, 2010.
(5)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 25, 2014.
(6)(2)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 30, 2004.
(7)(3)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 11, 2010.21, 2019.
(8)(4)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 13, 2014.
(9)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 4, 2014.
(10)(5)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2014.May 9, 2017.
(11)(6)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 4, 2020.
(7)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009.
(12)(8)Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 14, 2007.
(13)(9)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed April 9, 2015.3, 2020.

 

3036
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant had duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date:March 22, 201829, 2021INTELLICHECK, INC.
  
 By:/s/ Bryan Lewis
  Bryan Lewis
  President and Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 INTELLICHECK, INC.
   
Date:March 22, 201829, 2021By:/s/ Bryan Lewis
  Bryan Lewis
  President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
  (Principal Executive Officer)
   
Date:March 22, 201829, 2021By:/s/ Bill White
  Bill White
  Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
   
Date:March 22, 201829, 2021By:/s/ Michael D. MaloneGuy L. Smith
  Michael D. Malone,Guy L. Smith, Chairman and Director
   
Date:March 22, 201829, 2021

By:

/s/ Emil R. Bedard

  Lt. Gen. Emil R. Bedard, Director
   
Date:March 22, 201829, 2021

By:

/s/ Jack A. Davis

  Jack A. Davis, Director
   
Date:March 22, 201829, 2021By:/s/ William P. Georges
  William P. Georges, Director
   
Date:March 22, 201829, 2021

By:

/s/ Guy L. SmithDylan Glenn

  Guy L. Smith,Dylan Glenn, Director
   
Date:March 22, 201829, 2021

By:

/s/ Amelia L. Ruzzo

Amelia L. Ruzzo, Director
Date:March 29, 2021By:/s/ David E. Ullman

  David E. Ullman, Director

37

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No. Description
10.1Agreement of Lease between the Company and 535 Realty Management Corp., dated as of December 27, 2017*
10.10Bill Roof Separation and Consulting Agreement dated November 2, 2017*
23.1 Consent of EisnerAmper LLP *
31.1 Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
31.2 Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
32 Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
101.INS XBRL Instance Document *
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema *
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase *
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase *
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase *
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase *

 

*Filed herewith.

38

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

INDEX

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMF-2
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019F-6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-7

 

F-1
 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To theBoard of Directors and Stockholders of

Intellicheck, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Intellicheck Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the consolidated results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

Goodwill Impairment Analysis

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had goodwill of approximately $8.1 million. As described in Notes 1 and 4 to the financial statements, the Company performs its impairment test of goodwill annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the Company exceeds its fair value. The Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill in the fourth quarter of 2020. The Company operates as one reporting segment, operating segment and reporting unit. The Company’s goodwill impairment test involves comparing the Company’s carrying value to its estimated fair value. The fair value was determined using the weighting of certain valuation techniques, including both income and market approaches, which include a discounted cash flow analysis, similar public company financial comparisons, along with market capitalization. The Company’s fair value estimates require management to make significant estimates and assumptions including discount rates, projected revenue growth rates, operating margins and guideline public company multiples.

We identified the impairment test of goodwill as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgement by management in the estimates and assumptions used in developing the fair value estimate of the Company. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgement, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s significant estimates and assumptions related to discount rates, projected revenue growth rates, operating margins and guideline public company multiples. Additionally, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. We obtained an understanding and evaluated the design of controls over the Company’s impairment test of goodwill, including developing the estimate of fair value. Our procedures included, among others: evaluated the forecasted revenue growth rates and operating margins to the Company’s underlying business strategies and growth plans and considered if they were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit; evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast revenue growth rates and operating margins by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecasts; and performed sensitivity analyses over significant estimates and assumptions including discount rates and projected revenue growth rates when assessing the overall impact on the estimate of fair value compared to the carrying value. In addition, we utilized our valuation specialists with specialized skills and knowledge, in evaluating the reasonableness of the Company’s methodology for estimating fair value including both the income and market approaches; evaluating the discount rates used by management by comparing it to a range of discount rates developed using existing market information for comparable entities; evaluating market approaches including selected guideline company multiples for reasonableness and evaluating the mathematical accuracy of the calculations included in both the income and market approaches.

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010.

 

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

EISNERAMPER LLP

Iselin, New Jersey

March 22, 2018

F-2

29, 2021

INTELLICHECK, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 20172020 and 20162019

 

 2017 2016  2020 2019 
          
ASSETS                
CURRENT ASSETS:                
Cash $8,010,161  $3,092,172  $13,121,392  $3,350,853 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $18,750 and $74,354 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively  652,627   502,126 
Inventory  85,321   70,547 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $42,974 and $42,055 as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively  2,119,861   1,674,894 
Other current assets  218,835   165,473   340,718   354,349 
Total current assets  8,966,944   3,830,318   15,581,971   5,380,096 
                
NOTE RECEIVABLE, net of current portion  71,138   114,909 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net  211,602   270,776   138,870   181,731 
GOODWILL  8,101,661   8,101,661   8,101,661   8,101,661 
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net  463,578   2,154,563   482,591   174,237 
OPERATING LEASE RIGHT-OF-USE ASSET  31,131   151,668 
OTHER ASSETS  67,181   61,298   4,250   7,778 
                
Total assets $17,882,104  $14,533,525  $24,340,474  $13,997,171 
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
                
CURRENT LIABILITIES:                
Accounts payable $71,578  $14,140  $46,171  $95,388 
Accrued expenses  815,350   519,957   1,638,798   1,408,086 
Operating lease liability, current portion  32,620   125,851 
Deferred revenue, current portion  739,980   825,538   402,782   572,391 
Total current liabilities  1,626,908   1,359,635   2,120,371   2,201,716 
                
OTHER LIABILITIES                
Deferred revenue, long-term portion  87,736   177,306   8,662   13,322 
Other long-term liabilities  158,407   61,133 
Operating lease liability, long-term portion  -   32,620 
                
Total liabilities  1,873,051   1,598,074   2,129,033   2,247,658 
                
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINIGENCIES        
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)        
                
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:                
Common stock – $.001 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 15,009,246 and 10,718,553 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively  15,009   10,719 
Common stock – $.001 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 18,410,458 and 16,041,650 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively  18,410   16,042 
Additional paid-in capital  126,416,869   117,293,158   138,569,746   128,668,583 
Accumulated deficit  (110,422,825)  (104,368,426)  (116,376,715)  (116,935,112)
Total stockholders’ equity  16,009,053   12,935,451   22,211,441   11,749,513 
                
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $17,882,104  $14,533,525  $24,340,474  $13,997,171 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidatedfinancial statements.

F-3

INTELLICHECK, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172020 AND 20162019

 

 2017 2016  2020 2019 
          
REVENUES $3,598,296  $3,838,963  $10,734,509  $7,663,658 
COST OF REVENUES  (521,835)  (769,048)  (1,425,802)  (995,791)
Gross profit  3,076,461   3,069,915   9,308,707   6,667,867 
                
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Selling, general and administrative  5,865,278   6,413,933   5,893,371   5,658,958 
Research and development  1,916,107   2,405,593   3,674,987   3,656,679 
Impairment of intangible assets  1,375,422   - 
                
Total operating expenses  9,156,807   8,819,526   9,568,358   9,315,637 
                
Loss from operations  (6,080,346)  (5,749,611)  (259,651)  (2,647,770)
                
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
OTHER INCOME        
Gain on forgiveness of unsecured promissory note  796,100   - 
Interest and other income  59,841   14,930   21,948   99,059 
Total other income  818,048   99,059 
                
Net loss $(6,020,505) $(5,734,681)
Net income (loss) $558,397  $(2,548,711)
                
PER SHARE INFORMATION:                
Loss per common share -        
Basic/Diluted $(0.48) $(0.58)
Income (Loss) per common share -        
Basic $0.03  $(0.16)
Diluted $0.03  $(0.16)
                
Weighted average common shares used in computing per share amounts -                
Basic/Diluted  12,428,652   9,914,809 
Basic  17,324,150   15,792,470 
Diluted  18,020,866   15,792,470 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidatedfinancial statements.

F-4

INTELLICHECK, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172020 AND 20162019

 

        Additional       
  Common Stock  Paid-in  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Total 
                
BALANCE, December 31, 2015  9,878,906  $9,879  $114,950,278  $(98,633,745) $16,326,412 
                     
Stock-based compensation expense (employees and directors)  -   -   935,899   -   935,899 
Issuance of common stock, net of costs  1,200,000   1,200   1,776,750   -   1,777,950 
Purchase and retirement of common stock  (979,114)  (979)  (1,095,629)  -   (1,096,608)
Exercise of stock options  345,127   345   389,534   -   389,879 
Exercise of warrants  153,000   153   336,447   -   336,600 
Vesting of restricted stock  120,634   121   (121)  -   - 
Net loss  -   -   -   (5,734,681)  (5,734,681)
                     
BALANCE, December 31, 2016  10,718,553  $10,719  $117,293,158  $(104,368,426) $12,935,451 
Cumulative adjustment upon modified retrospective adoption of ASU 2016-09  -   -   33,894   (33,894)  - 
Balance after adoption of recent accounting pronouncement  10,718,553   10,719   117,327,052   (104,402,320)  12,935,451 
Stock-based compensation expense (employees and directors)  -   -   435,679   -   435,679 
Issuance of common stock, net of costs  4,168,750   4,169   8,508,692   -   8,512,861 
Exercise of stock options  10,000   10   10,090   -   10,100 
Exercise of warrants  63,500   63   139,637   -   139,700 
Vesting of restricted stock  50,207   50   (50)  -   -
Shares forfeited in exchange for payment of withholding taxes  (1,764)  (2)  (4,231)  -   (4,233)
Net loss  -   -   -   (6,020,505)  (6,020,505)
                     
BALANCE, December 31, 2017  15,009,246  $15,009  $126,416,869  $(110,422,825) $16,009,053 
        Additional     Total 
  Common Stock  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
                
BALANCE, December 31, 2018  15,638,765  $15,639  $127,290,467  $(114,386,401) $12,919,705 
                     
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   584,865   -   584,865 
Exercise of stock options, net of cashless exercise of 21,864 shares  73,008   73   89,427   -   89,500 
Issuance of shares for vested restricted stock grants  9,807   9   (9)  -   - 
Exercise of warrants  320,070   321   703,833   -   704,154 
Net loss  -   -   -   (2,548,711)  (2,548,711)
                     
BALANCE, December 31, 2019  16,041,650  $16,042  $128,668,583  $(116,935,112) $11,749,513 
                     
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   409,477   -   409,477 
Issuance of common stock, net of costs  1,769,230   1,769   10,567,698   -   10,569,467 
Exercise of stock options, net of cashless exercise of 93,840 shares  689,901   690   203,468   -   204,158 
Issuance of shares for vested restricted stock grants  24,778   24   (24)  -   - 
Exercise of warrants  50,750   51   111,599   -   111,650 
Settlement of executive bonuses with issuance of restricted stock units  14,993   15   84,695   -   84,710 
Shares forfeited in exchange for withholding taxes  (180,844)  (181)  (1,475,750)  -   (1,475,931)
Net income  -   -   -   558,397   558,397 
                     
BALANCE, December 31, 2020  18,410,458  $18,410  $138,569,746  $(116,376,715) $22,211,441 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidatedfinancial statements.

F-5

INTELLICHECK, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172020 AND 20162019

 

  2017  2016 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
         
Net loss $(6,020,505) $(5,734,681)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  412,351   434,291 
Stock-based compensation expense  435,679   935,899 
Change in provision for doubtful accounts  -  74,354 
Deferred rent  (47,628)  (38,222)
Impairment of intangible assets  1,375,422   - 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable  (150,501)  582,492 
(Increase) decrease in inventory  (14,774)  4,185 
(Increase) decrease in other current assets  (52,051)  12,889 
(Increase) in other assets  (5,883)  (1,498)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses  339,326   (262,496)
(Decrease) in deferred revenue  (175,128)  (247,631)
Increase in other long-term liabilities  158,407   - 
Net cash used in operating activities  (3,745,285)  (4,240,418)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING activities:        
         
Purchases of property and equipment  (37,614)  (64,075)
Collection on note receivable  42,460   35,587 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  4,846   (28,488)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock  8,512,861   1,777,950 
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock from exercise of stock options  10,100   389,879 
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock from exercise of warrants  139,700   336,600 
Purchase and retirement of common stock  -   (1,096,608)
Withholding taxes paid on vesting of restricted stock units  (4,233)  - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  8,658,428   1,407,821 
         
Net increase (decrease) increase in cash  4,917,989   (2,861,085)
         
CASH, beginning of year  3,092,172   5,953,257 
         
CASH, end of year $8,010,161  $3,092,172 
  2020  2019 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net income (loss) $558,397  $(2,548,711)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  179,405   249,895 
Stock-based compensation expense  409,477   584,865 
Change in provision for doubtful accounts  919   17,380 
Forgiveness of unsecured promissory note  (796,100)  - 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
(Increase) in accounts receivable  (445,886)  (672,840)
(Increase) in other current assets  (15,385)  (28,317)
Decrease in other assets  3,528   1,964 
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses  260,892   703,223 
(Decrease) in deferred revenue  (174,269)  (148,309)
Net cash used in operating activities  (19,022)  (1,840,850)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING activities:        
Purchases of software license  (400,000)  - 
Purchases of property, plant and equipment  (44,900)  (20,088)
Collection on note receivable  29,017   42,120 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (415,883)  22,032 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock  10,569,467   - 
Loan proceeds on unsecured promissory note under Paycheck Protection Program  796,100   - 
Loan proceeds on unsecured promissory note under Economic Injury Disaster Loan program  10,000   - 
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock from exercise of stock options  204,158   89,500 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from exercise of warrants  111,650   704,154 
Withholding taxes paid on exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units  (1,475,931)  - 
Loan payments on unsecured promissory note  (10,000)  - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  10,205,444   793,654 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash  9,770,539   (1,025,164)
         
CASH, beginning of year  3,350,853   4,376,017 
         
CASH, end of year $13,121,392  $3,350,853 
         
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:        
Settlement of executive bonuses with restricted stock units $84,710  $- 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidatedfinancial statements.

F-6

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

11. NATURE OF BUSINESS

 

Business

 

Intellicheck, Inc. (the “Company” or “Intellicheck”) is a leadingprominent technology company that is engaged in developing, integrating and marketing threat identification and identity authenticationverification solutions to address challenges that include commercial retail and banking fraud prevention, law enforcement threat identification, and mobile and handheld access control and security for the government, military and commercial markets.prevention. Intellicheck’s products include Retail ID™ID Check®, the industry leadinga solution for preventing identity fraud in the retail industry; Age ID™, aacross any industry delivered via smartphone, tablet, POS integration or tablet-based solution for preventing sale of age-restricted products to minors; Law ID™, a smartphone-based solution used by law enforcement officers to identify and mitigate threats; and Defense ID®, a mobile and fixed infrastructure solution for threat identification, identity authentication and access control to military bases and other government facilities.electronic devices.

 

Intellicheck continues to develop and release innovative products based upon its rich patent portfolio consisting of over 25 patents.nineteen issued patents and four pending.

 

Liquidity

 

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company incurred agenerated net lossincome of $6,020,505$558,397 and used cash in operations of $3,745,285.$19,022. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had cash of $8,010,161$13,121,392 and an accumulated deficit of $110,422,825.$116,376,715. On August 4, 2017,June 23, 2020, the Company completed a public offering of 4,168,7501,769,230 shares of its common stock, offered to the public at $2.25$6.50 per share resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $8,578,000$10,570,000 after deducting underwriter’sunderwriters discounts and commissions paid by the Company.Company and after deducting direct offering costs. Intellicheck intends to use these net proceeds for general corporate purposes including product developmentand working capital. This public offering is referenced in key markets, the integration of new features into existing new products and expansion of its sales force and engineering personnel.Note 10. Based on the Company’s business plan and cash resources, Intellicheck expects its existing and future resources and revenues generated from operations to satisfy its working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months.months from the date of filing.

 

However, if performance expectations fall short As of the filing of this Form 10-K, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the Company’s business and will likely continue to impact its business directly and/or expenses exceed expectations,indirectly for the foreseeable future. The Company may needis unable to secure additional financing or reduce expenses to continue operations. Failure to do so wouldaccurately predict the full impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have a material adverse impact on its results of operations or financial condition. There can be no assurancecondition due to numerous factors that any contemplated additional financing will be available on terms acceptable, if at all. If required,are not within its control, including the Company believes it would be able to reduce expenses to a sufficient level to continue as a going concern.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accountsduration and severity of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Mobilisa, Inc. (“Mobilisa”) and Positive Access Corporation (“Positive Access”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.outbreak together with any potential statewide closures resulting from the recent increases in cases nationwide.

 

2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased. There were no cash equivalents held on December 31, 2017 and 2016.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

The Company records its allowance for doubtful accounts based upon its assessment of various factors. The Company considers historical experience, the age of the accounts receivable balances, credit quality of the Company’s customers, current economic conditions and other factors that may affect customers’ ability to pay.

F-7

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market and cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory is primarily comprised of finished goods. As of December 31, 2017, most of our inventory related to Government and Commercial Identity products for intended near-term sales.

 

Long-Lived Assets and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company’s long-lived assets include property and equipment, goodwill, and intangible assets.

 

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be fully recoverable in accordance with ASC topic 350 and ASC Topic 360 to determine recoverability of its long-lived assets, the Company evaluates the probability that future undiscounted net cash flows, without interest charges, will be less than the carrying amount of the assets. Impairment is measured at fair value.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from three to ten-years using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over the lesser of the term of the lease or estimated useful life of the asset.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. Pursuant to ASC Topic 350, the Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter, or between annual tests, in certain circumstances. Under guidance, the Company first assessed qualitative factors to determine whether it was necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. An entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. Events or changes in circumstances which could trigger an impairment review include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, other entity specific events and sustained decrease in share price.

 

The Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill in the fourth quarter for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. For the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company determined no impairment charge was required.

 

Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets include trade names, patents, and non-contractual customer relationships as described more fully in Note 5.4. The Company uses the straight-line method to amortize these assets over their estimated useful lives. The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be fully recoverable in accordance with ASC Topic 360. To determine recoverability of its long-lived assets, the Company evaluates the probability that future undiscounted net cash flows, without interest charges, will be less than the carrying amount of the assets. Impairment is measured at fair value.

As a result of a projected loss of revenue from certain customers moving to another platform along with a shift in the Company’s marketing strategy for 2018, the Company performed a quantitativeThere were no impairment test as of December 31, 2017charges recognized for the patents, trade names and customer relationships acquired in the Mobilisa acquisition.  The Company utilized the income approach to test its patent and tradenames, specifically the Relief-from-Royalty method, which assumes that a user of that intangible asset would have to make a stream of payments to the owner of the asset in return for the rights to use that asset.  By acquiring the intangible asset, the user avoids these payments.  As a result of the analysis, $250,582 and $287,928, respectively, of impairment was recorded due to the decline in the valuation of trade names and patents. The Company utilized the income approach to test its customer relationships, specifically the Multi-Period Excess Earnings Method, which estimates the cash flows attributable to the customer relationships, after considering the return associated with other contributing assets.  As a result of the analysis, $836,912 of impairment was recorded due to the decline in the valuation of the customer relationships. Application of the impairment test requires judgement, including determination of royalty rates, and projecting revenue attributable to the assets in order to determine fair value.  These impairments, totaling $1,375,422, are recorded as Impairment of Intangible Assets on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.  No impairments were recognized during the yearyears ended December 31, 2016.

As a result of its outlook on the Defense ID business, the Company will shorten the remaining useful life on these Defense ID intangible assets to two years.

No impairments were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Deferred Rent

The Company received certain rent abatements2020 and incentives from landlord as an inducement to move into its New York office facility. The Company is amortizing these incentives on a straight-line basis over the period of its respective lease.

F-8

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2019.

 

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue

 

Revenue is generally recognized when persuasive evidenceGeneral

Most license fees and services revenue are generated from a combination of fixed-price and per-scan contracts. Under the per-scan revenue model, customers are charged a fee each time the customer scans an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred,identity document, such as a driver’s license, with the Company’s software. Under the fixed-price revenue model customers are charged a fixed monthly fee is fixed and determinable, collectability is probable, and there is no future Company involvementeither per device or commitment. The Company sells its commercial products directly through its sales force and through distributors. Revenue from direct sales of productsphysical business location to access the Company’s software. Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized when shippeda customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. The Company measures revenue based on the consideration specified in a customer arrangement, and revenue is recognized when the performance obligations in an arrangement are satisfied. A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct service to the customer. The transaction price of a contract is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when or as, the customer receives the benefit of the performance obligation. Customers typically receive the benefit of the Company’s services as they are performed. Substantially all customer contracts provide that the Company is compensated for services performed to date.

Invoicing is based on schedules established in customer contracts. Payment terms are generally established at 30 to 60 days from the invoice date. Product returns are recorded as a reduction to revenue.

Revenue is measured based on a consideration specified in a contract with a customer, and excludes any sales incentives and amounts collected on behalf of third parties. Revenues are recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to the customer, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Furthermore, the Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product or service to a customer.

Nature of goods and title has passed.services

 

UnderThe following is a description of the provisions of ASC Topic 605-25, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” for multi-element arrangements that include tangible products containing software essential to the tangible product’s functionality and undelivered software elements relating to the tangible product’s essential software,services from which the Company allocatesgenerates revenue, as well as the nature, timing of satisfaction of performance obligations, and significant payment terms for each:

F-8

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Software as a Service (SaaS)

Software as a service (SaaS) for hosted subscription services and licensed software allows customers to all deliverablesaccess a set of data for a predetermined length of time. As the customer obtains access at a point in time but continues to have access for the remainder of the subscription period, the customer is considered to simultaneously receive and consume the benefits provided by the entity’s performance as the entity performs. Accordingly, the revenue should be recognized over time based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, the Company uses a hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for allocating revenue to deliverables: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price and (iii) best estimateusage of the selling price (“ESP”). VSOE generally exists only when the Company sells the deliverable separatelyhosted subscription services and licensed software, which can vary from month to month. The revenue is the price actually charged by the Company for that deliverable. ESPs reflect the Company’s best estimates of what the selling prices of elements would be if they were sold regularlytypically based either on a stand-alone basis.formula such as number of locations using the service in a given month multiplied by a fee per location or the number of actual scans in a given month multiplied by a set price per scan based on the contract with the customer.

Other Subscription and Support Services

 

The Company also recognizes revenues from licensing ofother subscription and support services, which includes jurisdictional updates to certain commercial customers and support services particularly to its patented software toDefense ID® customers. The licensed software requiresThese subscriptions require continuing service or post contractual customer support and performance; accordingly,performance. As the customer obtains access at a portionpoint in time but continues to have access for the remainder of the subscription period, the customer is considered to simultaneously receive and consume the benefits provided by the entity’s performance as the entity performs. Accordingly, the revenue should be recognized over time based on usage, which can vary from month to month. The revenue is typically based on a formula such as number of locations in a given month multiplied by a fee per location.

Equipment Revenue

Revenue from the sale of equipment is recognized at a point in time. The point in time that the revenue is deferred basedrecognized is when the customer has control of the equipment which is when the customer receives the benefit and the Company’s performance obligation has been satisfied. Depending on its fair valuethe contract terms, that could either be at the time the equipment is shipped or at the time the equipment is received.

Non-Recurring Services Revenue

The non-recurring services include items such as training, installation, customization, and configuration. The Company recognizes revenue from non-recurring services contracts ratably over the service contract period as the customer consumes the benefit as it is provided and the Company’s performance obligation has been satisfied.

Extended Warranty

Extended warranty revenues are generated when a warranty is provided to the customer separately of other performance obligations when the equipment is sold. As the customer obtains access at a point in time and continues to have access for the remainder of the warranty term, the customer is considered to simultaneously receive and consume the benefits provided by the Company’s performance as the Company performs. The related revenue is recognized ratably over the period in which the future service, support and performance are provided, which is generally one to three years. Royalties from the licensingspecified term of the warranty period. The extended warranty is separate to the Company’s technologystandard warranty of usually one year that it receives from its vendor.

F-9

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Disaggregation of revenue

In the following tables, revenue is disaggregated by product and service and the timing of revenue recognition. The table also includes a reconciliation of the disaggregated revenue.

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Products and services        
Software as a Service (SaaS) $9,372,856  $6,102,280 
Other subscription and support services  199,302   682,325 
Equipment  1,045,021   480,304 
Non-recurring services  77,950   330,895 
Extended warranties on equipment  20,668   59,146 
Other  18,712   8,708 
  $10,734,509  $7,663,658 
Timing of revenue recognition        
Products transferred at a point in time $1,063,733  $489,012 
Services transferred over time  9,670,776   7,174,646 
  $10,734,509  $7,663,658 

Contract balances

The current portion of deferred revenue at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was $402,782 and $572,391, respectively, and primarily consists of revenue that is recognized over time for one-year software license contracts and hosted subscription services. The changes in these balances are related to the satisfaction or partial satisfaction of these contracts. Of these balances, as of December 31, 2019, $574,444 was recognized as revenues inrevenue for the period they are earned.year ended December 31, 2020. The long-term portion of deferred revenue is $8,662 and $13,322 as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

 

The Company also performs consulting workdid not recognize any material revenue in the current reporting period for other companies. These services are billed based on time and materials. Revenue from these arrangements is also recognized as time is spent onperformance obligations that were fully satisfied in previous periods.

Transaction price allocated to the contract and materials are purchased.

Subscriptions to database information can be purchased for month-to-month, one, two, and three year periods. Revenue from subscriptions are deferred and recognized over the contractual period, which is typically three years.remaining performance obligations

 

The Company offers enhanced extended warranties for its salesfollowing table includes estimated revenue expected to be recognized in the future related to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) at the end of hardware and software at a set price. The revenuethe reporting period:

  2021  2022  2023  Total 
             
Software as a Service (SaaS) $382,238  $-  $-  $382,238 
Other subscription and support services  12,438   4,370   1,463   18,271 
Extended warranties on equipment  8,106   2,145   684   10,935 
  $402,782  $6,515  $2,147  $411,444 

All consideration from these sales are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis overcontracts with customers is included in the contractual period, which is typically one to three years.amounts presented above.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Research and Development Costs

 

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.

 

Shipping Costs

 

The Company’s shipping and handling costs are included in cost of revenues for all periods presented.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and net operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using expected tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, due to the uncertainty of the realizability of those assets.

 

F-9

INTELLICHECK, INC.


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The Company adheres to the provisions of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. This pronouncement requires that the Company calculate the fair value of financial instruments and include this additional information in the notes to financial statements when the fair value is different than the book value of those financial instruments. The Company’s financial instruments include cash, and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, note receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments approximated fair value, due to their short-term nature.

 

Business Concentration and Credit Risk

 

Financial instruments, which subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents.cash. The Company maintains cash with one financial institution. The cash equivalents consist of money market funds. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these institutions.

 

The Company’s sales are principally made to large retail customers, financial institutions concentrated in the United States of America and to U.S. government entities. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations, generally does not require collateral, and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of customers, historical trends, and other information.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had two customers that accounted for 26%41% of revenue. The revenue was associated with two commercial identity sales customers. These customers represented 27%52% of total accounts receivable atas of December 31, 2017.2020. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company did not have any single customer accounthad three customers that accounted for 10%39% of revenue.

 

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had three suppliers to produce its input devices. The Company has modified its software to operate in windows basedwindows-based systems and can integrate with different hardware platforms that are readily available in the marketplace. The Company does not maintain a manufacturing facility of its own and is not dependent on maintaining its production relationships due to the flexibility of its software to run on multiple existing platforms.

 

Net LossIncome (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic net lossincome (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net lossincome (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net lossincome (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of these common stock equivalents comprising of outstanding options, warrants and restricted stock is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. The calculation of diluted net lossincome (loss) per share excludes all anti-dilutive shares.

  Year Ended 
  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Numerator:      
Net Loss $(6,020,505) $(5,734,681)
         
Denominator:        
Weighted average common shares –        
Basic/Diluted  12,428,652   9,914,809 
         
Net Loss per share –        
Basic/Diluted $(0.48) $(0.58)

F-10

All shares were considered anti-dilutive due to the net income (loss) for each of the respective years ended.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Numerator:        
Net Income (Loss) $558,397  $(2,548,711)
         
Denominator:        
Weighted average common shares – Basic  17,324,150   15,792,470 
Dilutive effect of equity incentive plans  696,716   - 
Weighted average common shares – Diluted  18,020,866   15,792,470 
         
Net Income (Loss) per share –        
Basic $0.03  $(0.16)
Diluted $0.03  $(0.16)

 

The following table summarizes the common stock equivalents excluded from lossincome (loss) per diluted share because their effect would be anti-dilutive:

 

 2017  2016  2020  2019 
          
Stock options  1,631,358   1,665,420   -   1,436,623 
Warrants  471,801   535,301   -   63,430 
Restricted stock  5,859   32,714   -   2,670 
Performance stock units  -   - 
Total  2,109,018   2,233,435       1,502,723 

 

Share Based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for the issuance of equity awards to employees in accordance ASC Topic 715718 and 505, which requires that the cost resulting from all share basedshare-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. This pronouncement establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share based payment arrangements and requires all companies to apply a fair value basedvalue-based measurement method in accounting for all share basedshare-based payment transactions with employees. Period compensation costs are included in selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses.

 

The Company recognizes compensation expense related to stock option grants on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

 

Comprehensive LossIncome (Loss)

 

The Company’s comprehensive lossincome (loss) is equal to its net lossincome (loss) for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Segment Information

 

The Company adheres to the provisions of ASC Topic 280, which establishes standards for the way public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in financial statements issued to shareholders. Management has determined that it has only one reporting segment.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements include impairment consideration and valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, deferred tax valuation allowances, allowances for doubtful accounts, revenue allocation of multi-element arrangements and the fair value of options granted under the Company’s share basedshare-based compensation plans. Due to the inherent uncertainties involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be different from those estimates.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Effective

 

In May 2014,December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP.for Income Taxes” as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in the accounting standards. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. In addition, this guidance requires new or expanded disclosuresstandard eliminates certain exceptions related to the judgments made by companies when following this framework and additional quantitative disclosures regarding contract balances and remaining performance obligations. ASU No. 2014-09 may be applied using either a full retrospective approach under which all years includedfor intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in the financial statements will be presented under the revised guidance, or a modified retrospective approach, under which financial statements will be prepared under the revised guidance for the year of adoption, but not for prior years. Under the latter method, entities will recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at the effective date for contracts that still require performance by the entity.

 F-11

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 foran interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date. ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company developed an implementation plan to adopt this new guidance, which included an assessment of the impact of the new guidance on our financial position and results of operations. The Company has completed its assessment and has determined that this standard will have no material impact on its financial position or results of operations, except enhanced disclosure regarding revenue recognition, including disclosures of revenue streams, performance obligations, variable considerationperiod and the related judgmentsrecognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The standard also clarifies and estimates necessary to apply the new standard. On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the new accounting standard ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and for all open contracts and related amendments as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 will be presented under ASC 606, while the comparative information will not be restated and will continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.

On January 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-09,Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting which simplifies severalother aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards, forfeitures and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 allows the Company to make an accounting policy election to either estimate forfeitures or account for forfeitures as they occur.taxes. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur andstandard is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis. As a result, the Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to accumulated deficit and additional paid-in-capital in the amount of $33,894 as of January 1, 2017 on the consolidated balance sheet.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11,Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory(“ASU 2015-11”) which changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The new guidance must be applied on a prospective basis and was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with2020 and early adoption permitted. Though the Company adopted this amendment on January 1, 2017, ASU 2015-17 had no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,Income Taxes (Topic 740):Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxeswhich simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by eliminating the separate classification of deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in the consolidated balance sheet. The amendments in the update require that all deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in the consolidated balance sheet. The amendments in this update were effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein and may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. Though the Company adopted this amendment on January 1, 2017, ASU 2015-17 had no material impact on its consolidated financial statements as all deferred tax assets and liabilities have a full valuation allowance.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,Leases, which requires that lease arrangements longer than 12 months’ result in an entity recognizing an asset and liability. The pronouncement is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance is expected to have on its consolidated financial statements.

 F-12

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Clarification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments which would eliminate the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows, by adding or clarifying guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for public entities with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented, unless deemed impracticable, in which case, prospective application is permitted. The Company does not expect the implementation of this standard towill have a material effect onimpact its consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact ofhas determined this standard did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2017,June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09,2016-13, Compensation-Stock CompensationFinancial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 718)326): ScopeMeasurement of Modification AccountingCredit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2017-09”) which clarifies when changes to measure credit losses on financial instruments, including trade receivables. The guidance eliminates the terms or conditionsprobable initial recognition threshold that was previously required prior to recognizing a credit loss on financial instruments. The credit loss estimate can now reflect an entity’s current estimate of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. ASU 2017-09 will reduce diversity in practice and result in fewer changes toall future expected credit losses. Under the terms of an award being accounted for as modifications. Under ASU 2017-09,previous guidance, an entity will not apply modification accounting to a share-based payment award if the award’s fair value, vesting conditionsonly considered past events and classification as an equity or liability instrument are the same immediately before and after the change. ASU 2017-09 will be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date.current conditions. The guidance is effective for annual periods, andsmaller reporting companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those annual periods,fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of certain amendments of this guidance must be applied on a modified retrospective basis and the adoption of the remaining amendments must be applied on a prospective basis. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact ofdoes not expect this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

3.ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable represent amounts due from the Company’s customers and are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The components of accounts receivable, net are as follows:

  2017  2016 
Accounts receivable $671,377  $576,480 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (18,750)  (74,354)
Accounts receivable, net $652,627  $502,126 

4.PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

Property and equipment are comprised of the following as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:

 

 2017  2016  2020  2019 
Computer equipment $965,797  $930,028  $1,064,676  $1,025,287 
Furniture and fixtures  73,305   73,305   136,524   136,524 
Leasehold improvements  43,249   174,619   41,257   41,257 
Office equipment  578,846   577,002   596,621   591,111 
Vehicles  -   30,676 
  1,661,197   1,785,630   1,839,078   1,794,179 
Less – Accumulated depreciation and amortization  1,449,595   1,514,854   (1,700,208)  (1,612,448)
 $211,602  $270,776  $138,870  $181,731 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 amounted to $96,788$87,759 and $118,727,$117,557, respectively.

 

 F-13

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.4. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

Identifiable intangible assets

 

The changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

 2017  2016  2020  2019 
Balance at beginning of year $2,154,563  $2,470,127  $174,237  $306,575 
Deduction: Impairment charge  (1,375,422)  - 
Addition: Acquisition of software license (See Note 11)  400,000   - 
Deduction: Amortization expense  (315,563)  (315,564)  (91,646)  (132,338)
Balance at end of year $463,578  $2,154,563  $482,591  $174,237 

 

The following table setstables set forth the components of intangible assets as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:

 

     As of December 31, 2017 
  Estimated  Adjusted       
  Useful  Carrying  Accumulated    
  Life  Amount  Amortization  Net 
             
Trade name  2 years  $339,590  $(324,060) $15,530 
Patents and copyrights  2-17 years   954,915   (711,781)  243,134 
Non-contractual customer relationships  2-10years   2,431,655   (2,226,741)  204,914 
      $3,726,160  $(3,262,582) $463,578 
     As of December 31, 2020 
  Estimated  Adjusted       
  Useful  Carrying  Accumulated    
  Life  Amount  Amortization  Net 
             
Patents and copyrights  2-17 years  $480,661  $(331,403) $149,258 
Developed technology  5 years   400,000   (66,667)  333,333 
      $880,661  $(398,070) $482,591 

 

  As of December 31, 2016 
  Adjusted       
  Carrying  Accumulated    
  Amount  Amortization  Net 
          
Trade name $590,172  $(297,992) $292,180 
Patents and copyrights  1,242,842   (644,231)  598,611 
Non-contractual customer relationships  3,268,568   (2,004,796)  1,263,772 
  $5,101,582  $(2,947,019)  2,154,563 
  As of December 31, 2019 
  Adjusted       
  Carrying  Accumulated    
  Amount  Amortization  Net 
          
Patents and copyrights $480,661  $(306,424) $174,237 
  $480,661  $(306,424) $174,237 

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following summarizes amortization of acquisition related intangible assets included in the statement of operations:

 

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Cost of sales $236,651  $236,651 
General and administrative  78,912   78,913 
  $315,563  $315,564 

 F-14

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
       
Cost of sales $81,372  $104,830 
General and administrative  10,274   27,508 
  $91,646  $132,338 

 

The Company expects that amortization expense for the next five succeeding years, and thereafter, will be as follows:

 

2018 $157,003 
2019 132,336 
2020 24,980 
2021 24,980 
2022 24,980 
2021 $104,979 
2022  104,979 
2023  104,979 
2024  104,979 
2025  38,313 
Thereafter  24,362 
  $482,591 

 

These amounts are subject to change based upon the review of recoverability and useful lives that are performed at least annually.

 

Goodwill

 

The excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the assets of acquired businesses is considered goodwill. Under authoritative guidance, purchased goodwill is not amortized, but rather it is periodically reviewed for impairment. The Company had goodwill of $8,101,661 atas of December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. This goodwill resulted from the acquisition of Mobilisa, Inc. and Positive Access Corporation.

 

For the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill in the fourth quarter. Under authoritative guidance, the Company can use industry and Company specific qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that impairment exists, before using a two-step quantitative analysis. Events or changes in circumstances which could trigger an impairment review include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, other entity specific events and sustained decrease in share price. The Company performed the first step of the goodwill impairment test to identify potential impairment by comparing fair value of the Company to its carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value was determined using the weighting of certain valuation techniques, including both income and market approaches which include a discounted cash flow analysis, an estimation of an implied control premium, in addition to the Company’ssimilar public company financial comparisons, along with market capitalization on the measurement date. The implied control premium selected was developed based on certain observable market data of comparable companies.capitalization. The market capitalization is sensitive to the volatility of the Company’s stock price. Although the Company believes that the factors considered in the impairment analysis are reasonable, changes in any one of the assumptions used could have produced a different result which may have led to an impairment charge. Any future impairment loss could have a material adverse effect on our long-term assets and operating expenses in the period in which impairment is determined to exist.

 

For the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company determined that the fair value was more than its carrying amount and therefore the second step of the goodwill impairment test was not required.

 

Accumulated impairment charges on goodwill through December 31, 2017 and 2016 are2020 were $30,085,862.

 

6.5. NOTE RECEIVABLE

 

On August 31, 2015, the Company sold its wireless enterprise assets to the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe (the “Buyer”) for total consideration of $350,000 which consists of an upfront cash payment of $30,000, the issuance of a promissory note totaling $200,000 and contingent consideration up to a maximum of $120,000 based on future earnings. The Company recognized a gain onearnings until the sale of approximately $109,000 which was includedtime the note has been paid in interest and other income for the year ended December 31, 2015. Total assets disposed include certain trade names associated with the wireless assets with a net book value of approximately $65,000 and certain fixed assets with a net book value of approximately $56,000.full. Any gain on contingent consideration willwould be recognized as it is earned.

 F-15

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Under the terms of the promissory note, monthly payments in the amount of $3,683 including principal and interest at 4%, are to bewere made over a 60-month term expiring in August 2020. At December 31, 2017,2020, the promissory note was paid in full. At December 31, 2019, the total note receivable was $111,609, of$29,017, which $40,471 and $71,138 is included in Other Current Assets and Notes Receivable, net of current portion, respectively on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2016, the total note receivable was $153,667, of which $38,758 and $114,909 is included in other Current Assets and NotesReceivable, net of current portion, respectively on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

7.6. DEBT

Promissory Note

On April 9, 2020 the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $796,100 (the “Note”) with First Bank (the “Loan Servicer”) under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and established as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The Company received these proceeds on April 14, 2020 plus an additional $10,000 advance under the Economic Injury Disaster Loan program (“EIDL”) on April 15, 2020. Under the terms of the Note, the Company can apply for forgiveness on this Note with the Loan Servicer if certain conditions including the use of the Note proceeds are met over a 24-week period commencing from the date of the Note. The Note has an interest rate of 1%. The Company has not imputed interest on the Note as the rate is determined to be a below-market rate due to the scope exception in ASC 835-30-15-3(e) for government-mandated interest rates. In November 2020, the Company received notification from the Loan Servicer that the Note was fully forgiven and recorded income from the extinguishment of its obligation as the Company was legally released from being the primary obligor in accordance with ASC 405-20-40-1.

The Company repaid its EIDL advance on December 7, 2020.On December 27, 2020, Congress passed the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits and Venues Act (“the Economic Aid Act”) which relieves companies of their obligations to repay EIDL advances. As a result of this ruling, the SBA returned this advance, plus interest to the Loan Servicer on February 18, 2021, which was immediately returned to the Company.

 

Revolving Line of Credit

 

On May 22, 2017,February 6, 2019, the Company entered into a revolving credit facility with Northwest Bank (“Northwest”) and simultaneously terminated its revolving credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank. This new agreementCitibank that allows for borrowings up to the lesser of (i) $2,000,000 or (ii) 95% of the collateralized balance in the Company’s money marketexisting fixed income investment account less $250,000. The borrowings are secured by the Company’s existing deposit and money market accounts with Northwest.Citibank subject to certain limitations. The facility bears interest at a rate consistent with Northwest’s money market account (0.65%of Citibank’s Base Rate (4.75% at December 31, 2017) plus 3%2020) minus 2%. Interest is payable monthly and the principal is due upon maturity on May 22, 2018. Asas of December 31, 2017,2020, there were no amounts outstanding under this facility and unused availability under this facility was $2,000,000.

 

8.7. ACCRUED EXPENSES

 

Accrued expenses are comprised of the following as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:

 

 2017  2016  2020  2019 
Professional fees $78,552  $73,999  $123,787  $171,331 
Payroll and related  365,384   310,996   604,302   544,441 
Severance payment to former officer  316,812   91,460 
Incentive bonuses  834,910   632,105 
Other  54,602   43,502   75,799   60,209 
 $815,350  $519,957  $1,638,798  $1,408,086 

INTELLICHECK, INC.

At December 31, 2017, the long-term portion of severance payments to a former officer was $158,407 and is included in Other Long-term Labilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

9.8. INCOME TAXES

 

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), was enacted into law which significantly modified U.S. corporate income tax law. The TCJA contains significant changes to corporate income taxation, including but not limited to the reduction of the corporate income tax rate from a top marginal rate of 35% to a flat rate of 21% in 2018. Notwithstanding the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the overall impact of the new federal tax law is uncertain, including to what extent various states will conform to the newly enacted federal tax law. The deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates that the Company believes will apply in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or paid. As a result, the Company remeasured the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities to reflect the reduction in the enacted U.S. corporate income tax rate.This resulted in a decrease in our gross deferred tax assets and liabilities and corresponding valuation allowance of approximately $1.5 million.

rate.

 

The Company is subject to federal and state income taxes as regular (Subchapter C) corporation. As a result of continuing losses for tax purposes, the Company has historically not paid income taxes and has recorded a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset.

 

The Company’s deferred tax assets are primarily the result of net operating losses (or NOLs). The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 20162020 as it is more likely than not that not all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The valuation is based on management’s assessment that it is more likely than not the NOL carryforwards may not be realized in the foreseeable future due to objective negative evidence that the Company would not generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets.

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets for federal and state income taxes as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 are as follows:

 

  2017  2016 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforwards $2,818,000  $2,760,000 
Stock-based compensation  81,000   121,000 
Reserves  5,000   - 
Intangible assets  26,000   - 
Severance costs and deferred rent  130,000   24,000 
Research and development tax credits  206,000   166,000 
Total deferred tax assets  3,266,000   3,071,000 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Intangible assets  -  (628,000)
Depreciation  (33,000)  (48,000)
Reserves  -   (22,000)
Total deferred tax liabilities  (33,000)  (698,000)
Net deferred tax assets  3,233,000   2,373,000 
Less: Valuation allowance  (3,233,000)  (2,373,000)
Deferred tax assets, net of allowance $-  $- 

 F-16

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  2020  2019 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforwards $4,624,000  $4,498,000 
Payroll related accruals  235,000   - 
Stock-based compensation  89,000   171,000 
Intangible assets  89,000   78,000 
Reserves  11,000   11,000 
Research and development tax credits  411,000   333,000 
Total deferred tax assets  5,459,000   5,091,000 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Depreciation  (24,000)  (30,000)
Total deferred tax liabilities  (24,000)  (30,000)
Net deferred tax assets  5,435,000   5,061,000 
Less: Valuation allowance  (5,435,000)  (5,061,000)
Deferred tax assets, net of allowance $-  $- 

 

There were no tax interest or penalties recorded in the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.

 

In March 2016, the Company completed an Internal Revenue Code Section 382 study which determined that a cumulative three-year ownership change in excess of 50% had occurred in March 2016 due to a share repurchase. As a result, the Company’s available NOL was reduced from $47.4 million to $2.2 million during the first quarter of 2016. The Company’s available NOL at December 31, 20172020 was approximately $11$17 million. The federal and state NOL’s incurred in all years through 2020 are available to offset future taxable income and expire from 20182021 through 20372040 if not utilized.

 

The Company files numerous tax returns in various jurisdictions. The Company is not currently under examination by any taxing authority, nor has the Company signed any waiver of the statute of limitations with any taxing authority. The Company remains open to examination by major taxing jurisdictions from 20132017 to date. TheASC Topic 740-10 requires evaluation of uncertain tax positions. As of December 31, 2020, the Company believes there arehas no unresolvedmaterial uncertain tax issues or tax claims likely to be material to its financial position.positions.

 

The effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 is different from the tax benefit that would result from applying the statutory tax rates primarily due to the recognition of valuation allowances. In 2017,2020, the valuation allowance increased approximately $860,000$374,000 primarily related to the timing of payroll related costs and an increase of the Company’s NOLsNOLs. The Company had book income in 2020 and a tax NOL was generated primarily due to permanent differences that occurred during the impairment charge on the intangible assets offset by the reduction in the new corporate income tax rate.year.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

ASC Topic 740-10 requires evaluation of uncertain tax positions. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has no material uncertain tax positions.NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

10.9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

 

In January 1997, the Board of Directors authorized the creation of a class of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with a par value of $.01. The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into an equal number of common shares at the holder’s option, subject to adjustment for anti-dilution. The holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends as and if declared by the Board of Directors. In the event of liquidation or dissolution of the Company, the holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive all accrued dividends, if applicable, plus the liquidation price of $1.00 per share. As of December 31, 2017,2020, and 2016,2019, there were no outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

 

Stock Options and Share Based Compensation

 

To retain and attract qualified personnel necessary for the success of the Company, the Company adopted the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) covering up to 3,000,0004,000,000 of the Company’s common shares, pursuant to which officers, directors, key employees and consultants to the Company are eligible to receive incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options and restricted stock units. All the Plans prior to Company’s 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan have been closed. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers this Plan and determines the terms and conditions of options granted, including the exercise price. This Plan generally provides that all stock options will expire within ten years of the date of grant. Incentive stock options granted under this Plan must be granted at an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value per share at the date of the grant and the exercise price must not be less than 110% of the fair market value per share at the date of the grant for grants to persons owning more than 10% of the voting stock of the Company. This Plan also entitles non-employee directors to receive grants of non-qualified stock options as approved by the Board of Directors.

 

 F-17

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the options. The table below presents the weighted average expected life of the options in years. The expected life computation is based on the time to option expiration. Volatility is determined using changes in historical stock prices. The interest rate for periods within the expected life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

 

The fair value of share-based payment units was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions and weighted average fair values as follows:

 

 Twelve Months Ended 
 December 31, 
 2017  2016  Year Ended December 31, 2019 
Valuation assumptions:            
Grant price  -  $1.01 - $2.79  $2.68 
Exercise price  -  $1.01 - $2.79  $2.68 
Expected dividend yield  -   0%  0%
Expected volatility  -   96.77% - 98.05%  84.92%
Expected life (in years)  -   5   5 
Risk-free interest rate  -   0.94% - 2.10%  2.49%

There were no stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2020.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Stock option activity under the Plans during the periods indicated below is as follows:

 

  

Number of

Shares

Subject to

Issuance

  

Weighted-

average

Exercise

Price

  

Weighted-

average

Remaining

Contractual

Term

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  1,901,298  $1.46   4.51 years    
                 
Granted  269,543  $1.31         
Forfeited or expired  (160,294)  2.58         
Exercised  (345,127)  1.13         
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  1,665,420  $1.40   3.62 years    
                 
Granted  -   -         
Forfeited or expired  (24,062)  4.06         
Exercised  (10,000)  1.01         
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  1,631,358  $1.36   1.70 years  $2,106,669 
                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2017  1,457,764  $1.37   1.56 years $1,887,777 

 F-18

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  

 

Number of

Shares

Subject to

Issuance

  

 

Weighted-

average

Exercise

Price

  

Weighted-

average

Remaining

Contractual

Term

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 
            
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  1,072,332  $1.44  1.85 years  - 
               
Granted  444,163   2.68       
Exercised  (94,872)  2.08       
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  1,421,623  $1.78  1.96 years $8,113,777 
               
Granted  -   -       
Exercised  (783,741)  1.20       
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  637,882  $2.50  2.55 years $5,686,421 
               
Exercisable at December 31, 2020  359,967  $2.33  2.20 years $3,269,723 

 

The following is a summary of stock options as of December 31, 2017:2020:

 

   Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
Range of Exercise Prices  Number of
Options
  Weighted-
average
Remaining Life
  Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price
  Number of
Options
  Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price
 
$1.15 to $1.56   1,483,298   1.70 years  $1.16   1,343,454  $1.16 
$1.75 to $2.79   56,000   3.49 years  $2.03   22,250  $2.31 
$3.12 to $5.68   92,060   0.70 years  $4.15   92,060  $4.15 
     1,631,358   1.70 years  $1.36   1,457,764  $1.37 
  Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
Range of Exercise Prices Number of
Options
  Weighted-
average
Remaining Life
 Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price
  Number of
Options
  Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price
 
$1.01 to $1.56  71,719   0.17 years $1.02   71,719  $1.16 
$1.75 to $2.87  566,163   2.85 years $2.68   288,248  $2.65 
   637,882   2.55 years $2.50   359,967  $2.33 

 

The weighted-average fair value of the options granted during the year ended December 31, 20162019 is $0.96.$1.82.

 

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had 878,4251,191,445 shares available for future grants under the Plans.

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

The Company issues Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) which are equity-based instruments that may be settled in shares of common stock of the Company. The Company issues RSUs to certain directors as compensation which vest with the passage of time. The vesting of all RSUs is contingent on continued board services.

 

The compensation expense incurred by the Company for RSUs is based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is amortized ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period and charged to general and administrative expense with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
          
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  67,077  $1.56  $- 
             
Granted  86,271   1.76     
Vested and Settled in Shares  (120,634)  1.60     
Canceled / Expired  -   -     
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  32,714   1.89   26,010 
             
Granted  23,352   2.87     
Vested and Settled in Shares  (50,207)  2.31     
Canceled / Expired  -  $-   $ 
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  5,859  $2.56  $- 

Restricted stock unit activity under the Plans during the periods indicated below is as follows:

  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
          
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  -  $-   - 
             
Granted  12,477   5.53     
Vested and Settled in shares  (9,807)  5.00     
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  2,670  $7.49  $- 
             
Granted  38,855   5.78     
Vested and Settled in shares  (39,771)  5.65     
Outstanding December 31, 2020  1,754  $11.40  $- 

Performance Stock Units

On August 7, 2020, the Company issued 265,942 Performance Stock Units (PSUs) to its officers and certain employees as compensation. For these PSU agreements, 50% vest based on the Company’s market price and 50% vest based on its Adjusted EBITDA performance metric. Both the conditions are to occur over a passage of a specified time and is contingent on continued employment services.

For the market condition, compensation expense is based on a Geometric Brownian Motion valuation model based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is amortized ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite period. For the performance condition, the Company reviews the probability of achieving this goal on a periodic basis. If the Company determines that it is probable that the performance criteria will be achieved, the amount of compensation cost derived for this performance metric is amortized over the anticipated service period. If these criteria are not met, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost would be reversed. For both conditions, compensation expense is charged to selling, general and administrative and research and development expense with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital.

  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
          
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  -  $-  $- 
Granted  265,942   7.91     
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  265,942  $7.91  $- 

 

As of December 31, 2017,2020, there was $121,594$627,842 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to all unvested stock options and restricted stock units, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.31.98 years.

 F-19

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Share based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 is as follows:

 

 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
Compensation cost recognized: 2017  2016  2020  2019 
Stock options $368,465  $775,338  $198,407  $515,805 
Restricted stock units  67,214   160,561   140,000   69,060 
Performance stock units  71,070   - 
 $435,679  $935,899  $409,477  $584,865 

 

Share based compensation is included in operating expenses as follows:

 

 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2017  2016  2020  2019 
General and administrative $408,772  $873,392 
Selling, general and administrative $366,780  $561,391 
Research and development  26,907   62,507   42,697   23,474 
 $435,679  $935,899  $409,477  $584,865 

 

The Company has a net operating loss carry-forward as of December 31, 2017,2020, and no excess tax benefits for the tax deductions related to share basedshare-based awards were recognized in the statements of operations. Additionally, no incremental tax benefits were recognized from stock options exercised in 20172020 that would have resulted in a reclassification to reduce net cash provided by operating activities with an offsetting increase in net cash provided by financing activities.

 

All stock options have been issued with an exercise price that is equal or above the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant.

 

Warrants

 

All previously granted warrants were issued with an exercise price that was equal to or above the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had 471,80112,680 remaining warrants outstanding at an exercise prices ranging fromprice of $2.20 to $8.00 through 2021. There were 63,500 and 153,00050,750 warrants exercised at a price of $2.20 during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2020. There were 320,070 warrants exercised at a price of $2.20 during the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

11.10. ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK

 

On February 24, 2016, the Company entered into a stock repurchase agreement with two former directors, who were also members of management (the “Former Executives”) for the repurchase of all 979,114 shares owned by the Former Executives of the Company’s common stock for $1,096,608. The transaction was finalized on March 4, 2016.

On June 15, 2016,23, 2020, the Company completed a public offering of 1,200,0001,769,230 shares of its common stock, and five-year warrantsoffered to purchase 600,000 shares with an exercise price of $2.20the public at $6.50 per share, at a combined public offering of $1.75 per share and half-warrant.share. Net proceeds to the Company from this offering were approximately $1,902,000$10,710,000 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions paid by the Company. Direct offering costs totaling approximately $124,000$141,000 were recorded as a reduction to the net proceeds and included in additional paid-in-capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity. As part

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

The Company leases offices in Melville, New York which require monthly payments of $10,334 and expires March 31, 2021 under an operating lease. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The arrangement is a lease if it conveys the offering, there wasright to the Company to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. This operating lease is included in Operating Lease Right-of-Use (ROU) Asset, Operating Lease Liability, current portion and Operating Lease Liability, long-term portion on the Balance Sheets. The Company recognizes rent and utilities expense for this lease on a straight-line basis over the lease term. ROU assets represent the right to use an overallotment optionunderlying asset for the underwriterslease term and operating lease liabilities represent the obligation to purchase upmake lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As the Company’s lease does not provide an implicit rate, it uses its incremental borrowing rate of 5% based on the commencement date in determining the present value of these lease payments. The Company considers instruments with similar characteristics when calculating this incremental borrowing rate. Lease terms may include options to 180,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.63 per share. Throughextend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Rent expense which includes utilities was $125,616 for the years ended December 31, 2017, certain warrant holders exercised their right to purchase 216,500 shares of our common stock which resulted in net proceeds of approximately $476,000.

 F-20

2020 and 2019, and cash payments for rent and utilities was $130,611and $126,496 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

On August 4, 2017, the Company completed a public offering of 4,168,750 shares of its common stock, offered to the public at $2.25 per share. Net proceeds to the Company from this offering were approximately $8,670,000 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions paid by the Company. Direct offering costs totaling approximately $157,000 were recorded as a reduction to the net proceeds on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.

12.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESSoftware License Agreement

 

Operating Leases

The Company leases an office in Jericho, New York which expires on March 31, 2018. On December 27, 2017,February 26, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to lease an office in Melville, New York which commenced on March 1, 2018 and expires on February 28, 2021. Future minimum lease payments under this lease agreement are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2018 $143,752 
2019  83,948 
2020  86,466 
2021  14,481 
Total $328,647 

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $287,535 and $406,308, respectively.

Royalty and License Agreements

The Company entered into ana license agreement with a former officerthird party (the “Licensor”) to purchase certain intellectual property rights and licensed software subject to certain restrictions. The purchase price of this license totaled $400,000. The Company has an option to pay the Company during 1996Licensor an annual fee of $35,000 for maintenance and updates to license certain software. The agreement stipulated, among other provisions, thatbe distributed from the officer would receive royalties equal to a percentage of the Company’s gross sales. This agreement was terminated in May 1999 and was superseded by a new agreement which calls for payment of royalties of 0.005% on gross sales from $2,000,000 to $52,000,000 and .0025% on gross sales more than $52,000,000 pertaining to those patents on this former officer was identified as an inventor. Cumulatively through December 31, 2017, total fees paid under this agreement amounted to approximately $2,000.Licensor.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Company is not aware of any infringement by our products or technology on the proprietary rights of others.

 

The Company is not currently involved in any legal or regulatory proceeding, or arbitration, the outcome of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on its business.

 

Severance and Change-in-Control Agreements

 

On November 29, 2017,25, 2020, Bill White, the Chief Financial Officer and the then Interim Chief ExecutiveOperating Officer entered into a severance agreement with the Company (the “Agreement”). The Agreement provides that in consideration of his services and pursuant to the Agreement, in the event that Mr. White’s employment is terminated without “cause” (as such term is defined in the Agreement), Mr. White will receive a 24-month continuation of salary payments, continuation of certain eligible medical benefits under the COBRA program, and a lump sum payment equal to any quarterly bonus target applicable during the quarter of termination plus any prior completed quarterly bonus which has not yet been determined (if any). In addition, the Agreement provides that upon such termination without Cause,cause, the Company will accelerate the vesting of all of Mr. White’s outstanding but unvested stock options or other equity incentives. This Agreement expires on November 29, 2023 and replaces aan amended severance agreement as amended, initiallypreviously executed by Mr. White and the Company on September 30, 2014 and amended May 30, 2017 (the “Original Agreement”). The Original Agreement, as amended, provided equivalent severance benefits as provided in the Agreement. The Original Agreement expired by its terms September 30,November 29, 2017.

 

 F-21

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe Company’s employment agreement dated February 1, 2018 (the “Agreement”) with Bryan Lewis, the Chief Executive Officer provides for certain severance payments in the event Mr. Lewis is terminated without cause including pay for six (6) months if Mr. Lewis is terminated without cause less than 12 months after February 1, 2018, pay for twelve (12) months if Mr. Lewis is terminated without cause between one (1) and five (5) years after February 1, 2018, and pay for eighteen (18) months if Mr. Lewis is terminated without cause after the fifth anniversary of this Agreement, in addition to reimbursement for certain living expenses and relocation advances and expenses in certain situations.

 

On October 4, 2017, Dr. William Roof, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer retired from the Company at the request of the board of directors (the “Board”). The parties have entered into a separation and consulting agreement dated as of November 2, 2017 (the “Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company maywould contact Dr. Roof to provide consulting services and he willwould provide consulting services at the Company’s request to ensure a smooth and effective transition of management and business affairs. In consideration of these services and to fulfill the Company’s obligations under Dr. Roof’s employment agreement with the Company, Dr. Roof will receivereceived aggregate cash payments of $500,000 over a 20-month period together with reimbursement of certain vision and dental benefit premiums. The Company does not anticipate this to be a significant effort and therefore has accounted for these payments as severance on the date of separation. In addition, the board of directors of the Company has extended the expiration date of Dr. Roof’s options to purchase Company’s common stock to six months from the Separation Date. The Board immediately appointed Bill White, the Company’s current Chief Financial Officer, as its Interim President and Chief Executive Officer. At December 31, 2017,2019, the total severance liability was $475,219, of which $316,812 and $158,407 is included in Accrued Expenses and Other Long-term Liabilities, respectively on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On May 19, 2016, Mr. Robert Williamsen, the Company’s Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer departed the Company, via mutual consent, to pursue other interests. Pursuant to Mr. Williamsen’s employment agreement with the Company, Mr. Williamsen will receive a payment of his monthly salary, subject to all applicable withholdings, for a period of 12 months following May 19, 2016, which the first payment commenced on July 7, 2016, and partial reimbursement for continued health, dental, and vision coverage through August 2016. Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Williamsen’s stock option agreements, Mr. Williamsen exercised his vested stock option awards. At the time of separation, the Company immediately recorded an expense for this one-year base salary of $225,000 and accelerated his portion of the Company’s stock-based compensation of approximately $149,000. At December 31, 2016, the remaining amount of this severance liability of approximately $91,000 is included in Accrued Expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.fully paid.

 

Each of the agreements requires the executive to devote substantially all his time and efforts to our business and contains non-competition and nondisclosure covenants of the officer for the term of his employment and for a one-year period thereafter. Each agreement provides that we may terminate the agreement for cause.

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Incentive Plans

In May 2020, the Board entered into a 2020 separate executive incentive bonus plan (“the 2020 Bonus Plan”) with four members of the Company’s executive management team. Each agreement, under the 2020 Bonus Plan, is based on certain goals achieved by the Company plus individual achievements by each executive. The bonus is to be paid in the form of cash. At December 31, 2020, this bonus liability was approximately $655,560 which is included in Accrued Expenses on the Balance Sheets.

In June 2020, the Company’s executive management team created a 2020 Employee Incentive Plan for all the Company’s non-executives and non-sales personnel. The incentive payment is based on the Company attaining certain revenue goals for the calendar year 2020 and is based as a percentage of the employee’s salary. At December 31, 2020 this bonus liability was $179,350 and is included in Accrued Expenses on the Balance Sheets.

 

401(k) Plan

 

The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) plan. The plan permits eligible employees to make voluntary contributions to a trust, up to a maximum of 35% of compensation, subject to certain limitations. The Company has elected to contribute a matching contribution equal to 50% of the first 6% of an eligible employee’s deferral election. The Company may also make discretionary contributions, subject to certain conditions, as defined in the plan. The Company’s matching contributions were $45,441$69,681 and $27,163$62,786 for 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The plan assets waswere approximately $2.2$3.0 million and $2.4 million at December 31, 2017.

13.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 F-22

INTELLICHECK, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company’s subsidiary, Mobilisa, Inc. leased office space from a company (“Lessor Company”) that is wholly-owned by two former directors, who were also members of management. The Company entered into a 10-year lease for the office space ending in 2017. The base annual rent for this facility was $96,010 was subject to annual increases based on the increase in the CPI index plus 1%. On February 24, 2016, the Company2020 and the Lessor Company entered into a lease amendment agreement reducing the space under this lease that took effect on March 31, 2016 thereby closing its office facility and occupied storage space that expired on December 31, 2016. As a result of this amended agreement, the Company made a $100,000 termination payment to the Lessor in full satisfaction the Company’s remaining obligations under its original lease. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, total rent payments for this facility were $0 and $124,001 (including this termination payment),2019, respectively.

 

On February 24, 2016,Subsequent Appointment of New President

The Board has appointed Garrett Gafke as the Company’s President.  Mr. Gafke’s first day of employment as President was March 23, 2021. With the appointment of Mr. Gafke as President, Bryan Lewis will continue as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. In connection with becoming the Company’s President, Mr. Gafke and the Company have entered into an employment agreement, dated March 23, 2021 (the “Agreement”). Mr. Gafke, on his first day of employment as President, was granted a restricted stock repurchase agreement with these Executives for the repurchaseunit award of all 979,11490,000 shares owned by the Executivesand an option to purchase 60,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, for $1,096,608. The transaction was finalized on March 4, 2016.

14.QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)both of which are subject to a three-year vesting schedule under the Company’s 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended.

 

The following table sets forth unaudited financial dataCompany’s agreement with Mr. Gafke also provides for each ofcertain severance payments in the Company’s last eight fiscal quarters.event Mr. Gafke is terminated without cause including pay for six (6) months if Mr. Gafke is terminated without cause less than 12 months after March 23, 2021 and pay for twelve (12) months if Mr. Gafke is terminated without cause after March 23, 2022.

 

  Year Ended December 31, 2017  Year Ended December 31, 2016 
  

First

Quarter

  

Second

Quarter

  

Third

Quarter

  

Fourth

Quarter

  

First

Quarter

  

Second

Quarter

  

Third

Quarter

  

Fourth

Quarter

 
  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 
Income Statement Data:                                
Revenues $713  $951  $967�� $967  $951  $940  $1,214  $734 
Gross profit  603   747   862   864   788   749   946   587 
Loss from operations  (940)  (1,101)  (1,083)  (2,957)  (2,149)  (1,779)  (730)  (1,092)
Net loss  (937)  (1,099)  (1,075)  (2,910)  (2,143)  (1,775)  (727)  (1,090)
                                 
Net loss per common share:                                
Basic $(0.09) $(0.10) $(0.08) $(0.19) $(0.22) $(0.19) $(0.07) $(0.10)
Diluted $(0.09) $(0.10) $(0.08) $(0.19) $(0.22) $(0.19) $(0.07) $(0.10)

Due to rounding, quarterly net loss per share may not add up to the total net loss for the year.

F-23

 

 F-23