Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162020


oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from _________________ to _________________
 
Commission File No.: 001-37703
 
IZEA WORLDWIDE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada37-1530765
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


480501 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 200313, PMB 247
Winter Park, FL
32789
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (407) 674-6911
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol (s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per shareIZEAThe Nasdaq Capital Market


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  o   No  x


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  o   No  x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes  x  No  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  x    No  o


Table of Contents

Indicated by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer
Non-Accelerated Filer
Smaller reporting company
Large accelerated filer  o
Emerging growth company
Accelerated filer  o
Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x


Table of Contents
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o   No  x


The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 20162020 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $25,058,698$44,990,377 based on the closing bid price of the registrant's common stock (its only outstanding equity security) of $7.62$1.14 per share on that date.June 30, 2020 (the last trading day prior to the end of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter). All executive officers and directors of the registrant and all 10% or greater stockholders have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be “affiliates” of the registrant.



APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

 As of March 24, 2017,26, 2021, there were 5,670,90459,129,390 shares of our common stock outstanding.




DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


None


 








Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearperiod ended December 31, 20162020


Table of Contents
 

Page
PART I
PART II
PART III
PART IV



i








PART I


Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) contains “forward-looking statements” intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements, which are not historical facts contained in this report, including those contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the notes to our consolidated financial statements, particularly those that utilize terminology such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” “thinks,” “intends,” “likely,” “projects,” “plans,” “pursue,” “strategy” or “future,” or the negative of these words or other words or expressions of similar meaning, are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information, and are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Future events and our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those reflected in these forward-looking statements. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause these differences include, but are not limited to, the following:

the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations, financial condition, and the worldwide economy;
customer cancellations;
our ability to raise additional funding needed to fund our business operation in the future;
our ability to satisfy the requirements for continued listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market;
our ability to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting;
our ability to protect our intellectual property;
our ability to maintain and grow our business;
results of any future litigation;
competition in the industry;
variability of operating results;
our ability to maintain and enhance our brand;
accuracy of tracking the number of user accounts;
our development and introduction of new products and services;
the successful integration of acquired companies, technologies and assets into our portfolio of software and services;
marketing and other business development initiatives;
general government regulation;
economic conditions, including as a result of health and safety concerns;
dependence on key personnel;
the ability to attract, hire, and retain personnel who possess the technical skills and experience necessary to meet the service requirements of our customers;
the potential liability with respect to actions taken by our existing and past employees;
risks associated with international sales; and
the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors section of this Annual Report.

All forward-looking statements in this document are based on our current expectations, intentions, and beliefs using information currently available to us as of the date of this Annual Report, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.


1

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS


Our Mission

Our mission is to champion the world's creators by helping them monetize their content, creativity, and influence.

Our Business


IZEA createsWorldwide, Inc. (together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, “we,” “us,” “our,” “IZEA” or the “Company”) is a Nevada corporation that was founded in February 2006 under the name PayPerPost, Inc. and operatesbecame a public company in May 2011. In January 2015, IZEA purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Ebyline, Inc. (“Ebyline”). In July 2016, IZEA purchased all the outstanding shares of capital stock of ZenContent, Inc. (“ZenContent”). In March 2016, we formed IZEA Canada, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Ontario, Canada, to operate as a sales and support office for IZEA's Canadian customers. On July 26, 2018, we purchased TapInfluence, Inc. (“TapInfluence”) pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 11, 2018 and amended July 20, 2018. ZenContent, Ebyline, and TapInfluence were merged into IZEA in December 2017, December 2019 and December 2020, respectively, after all assets were transferred to IZEA.

Our Company is based near Orlando, Florida with all of our employees working remotely since March 16, 2020.

We create and operate online marketplaces that connectsconnect marketers, including brands, agencies, and publishers, with influential content creators. These creators producesuch as Instagram influencers, TikTok influencers, YouTube stars, designers, photographers, and distributewriters (“creators”). The creators are compensated by us for producing unique content such as long and short form text, videos, photos, status updates, and photosillustrations for marketers or distributing such content on behalf of marketers through their personal websites, blogs, and social media channels. Our technology brings the marketers and creators together, enabling their transactions to be completed at scale through the management of custom content workflow, creator search and targeting, bidding, analytics and payment processing.


Marketers including brands, agencies and publishers, engage us to gain access to our industry expertise, technology, data, analytics, and network of creators. These companies are our primary customers and where we generate theThe majority of our revenue. Theythe marketers engage us to perform these services on their behalf, but they also have the ability to use our marketplaces on a self-service basis by licensing our technology. Our technology is used for two primary purposes;purposes: the engagement of online influencerscreators for influencer marketing campaigns (also known as “Influencer Marketing”), orand the creationengagement of creators to create stand-alone custom content for distribution through their owned channels (“Custom Content”).the marketers' own use and distribution.


Influencer Marketing.We work with marketers to facilitateenable influencer marketing campaigns at scale. A subset of influencer marketing known as "Sponsored Social"“Sponsored Social” is when a company compensates an online influencer such as a blogger or tweeter (“creators”)creators to share sponsored content with the creator'screators’ social network following.followings. This sponsored content is included within the body of the content stream, a practice also referred to as “native advertising.”stream. We believe that we pioneered the concept of a marketplace for sponsorships on the social web in 2006 with the launch of our first platform, PayPerPost, andPayPerPost. We have focused on scaling our product and service offerings ever since.since, including acquiring TapInfluence in July 2018 and launching Shake and BrandGraph in 2020.


Custom Content.We also work with marketers to augment or replace their content development efforts. These customers use our platform to connect withOur network of creators to produce bothproduces editorial and marketing content that can be published both online and offline. Our network of creators includes professional journalists, subject matter experts, bloggers, and everyday content creators, allowing our customers to produce content ranging from complex white papers to simple product descriptions. Many of our content customers use this service to create a steady stream of posts for their corporate blog.blogs. We first began offering custom content services in 2015 after theour acquisition of Ebyline, Inc. ("Ebyline"), a leading marketplace in the editorial content space, and continued to expand this offering with our acquisition of ZenContent Inc. ("ZenContent"), whichin July 2016, a company that predominantly focused on e-commerce-related asset creation, in July 2016.creation.


Our Platforms
IZEA.com and
The IZEA Exchange. We launched a public beta of IZEA.com powered by TheIZEA Exchange ("IZEAx" (“IZEAx) in March 2014 and unveiled our latest version 2.0 of the platform in February 2017. IZEAx is designed to provide a unified ecosystem that enables the creation and publication of multiple types of custom content including blog posts, status updates, videosthrough our creators’ personal websites, blogs, and photos through a wide variety of social media channels, including blogs,among others, Twitter, Facebook, InstagramYouTube, Twitch, and Tumblr, among others. The systemInstagram. We extensively use this platform to manage influencer marketing campaigns on behalf of our marketers. This platform is also available directly to our customers and partners via a self-serve portal,marketers as a managed service orself-service tool and as a licensed white label. label product. IZEAx is was engineered from the ground-up to replace all of our previous platforms with an integrated offering that is improved and more efficientefficient.

2

BrandGraph. In March 2020, we launched BrandGraph, a social media intelligence platform. BrandGraph is heavily integrated with IZEAx and both platforms rely heavily on data from each other, but it is also available as a stand-alone platform. BrandGraph offers marketers an analysis of share-of-voice, engagement benchmarking, category spending estimates, influencer identification, and sentiment analysis. The platform maps and classifies the complex hierarchy of corporation-to-brand relationships by category and associates social content with brands through a proprietary content analysis engine. It aggregates and analyzes content data to provide insights for marketers across their competitive landscapes that are particularly useful to influencer marketing professionals including our own managed services team.

Shake. In November 2020, we launched Shake, which is a new online marketplace where buyers can quickly and easily hire creators of all types for influencer marketing, photography, design, and other digital services. The Shake platform is aimed at digital creators seeking freelance “gig” work. Creators list available “Shakes” on their accounts in the company to operate. Our intention is to focus all of our engineering resources on the IZEAxplatform for the foreseeable future. We completed the sunset of our previous platforms in November 2014 and currently use IZEAx as the only automated system for managing social sponsorships.marketers select and purchase creative packages from them through a streamlined chat experience, assisted by ShakeBot - a proprietary, artificial intelligence assistant.

Ebyline.In January 2015, we acquired Ebyline Inc. includingand its technology platform that was created to source and compensate creators specifically for the creation and delivery of professional editorial content. Ebyline technology platform. Ebyline is a content marketplace which was originally designed as a self-service content marketplace to replace editorial newsrooms located within newspapersin the news agencies with a “Virtual Newsroom.” We have evolved Ebyline’s model“virtual newsroom” of creators to focus on producingproduce their content needs and to handle their content workflow. After the acquisition, we began to utilize the creators in the Ebyline platform to produce professional custom content for brands, in addition to the self-service functionality used by newspapers. We plan to integratehave been incorporating certain functions of this platform into IZEAx in order to have one consolidated platform in the future.future and by December 2019, we migrated all remaining customers into our IZEAx platform and dissolved the Ebyline entity.


ZenContent.In July 2016, we acquired ZenContent Inc. including its custom content creation workflow technology and database of creators. ZenContent’s platform enablesenabled us to produce highly scalable, multi-part production of content for both e-commerce entities, as well as brand marketers. Whereas Ebyline utilizes editorial or expert-grade creators (given its newspaper and media heritage), ZenContent’s approach is the opposite:customers. The ZenContent platform allowed us to parse work out to a wide array of qualified creators who together cancould develop custom content assets with unmatched quality, speed, and price. This platform is currentlywas utilized by our Managed

Servicecampaign fulfillment team to service its orders for custom content.content until December 2020.

TapInfluence. In July 2018, we acquired TapInfluence and its technology platform. TapInfluence marketed and sold software-as-a-service “SaaS” software that was complementary to IZEA’s existing influencer marketing products and services. We plan to integrateincorporated certain functions of this platform into IZEAx and improved influencer discovery and content workflow in order to have one consolidated platform. Throughout 2019, we migrated the users of this platform over to IZEAx and we discontinued use of this platform in the future.March 2020.


Our Marketers IZEAx, Shake, Ebyline,ZenContent, and Creators
IZEAx, Ebyline and ZenContent TapInfluence were designed with the same purpose: to streamline transactions between our internal campaign fulfillment team, marketers, and creators. We utilizeutilized these proprietary technologies to create efficiencies and economies of scale for bothall parties. Each platform providesThe knowledge base and technology from these platforms provide marketers with access to a large network of creators along with complete workflow management, content control, payment processing, and related performance tracking.
For influencer marketing campaigns, IZEAx provides integrated Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") legal compliance. In particular, the integrated FTC compliance framework requires creators to provide disclosure to their followers with respect to the sponsored nature of the content and allows marketers to review the content for FTC compliance. If the marketer chooses, sponsorships can be managed end-to-end without the need for interaction with one of our team members through a self-service interface.
IZEA offers turnkey account management services to manage campaigns on behalf of the customer if they choose to not license our technology to do so for themselves. This includes working with marketers to optimize the opportunity that is presented to creators, providing clear instructions on what is required to fill the opportunity, identifying and sourcing the creators that are the best fit for the opportunity, managing the offer and acceptance process with the creators, verifying that the creators’ content, once submitted, meets the requirements of the opportunity and managing the overall campaign to meet the goals of the marketer. Account managers also provide customers with progress updates on their campaign that include campaign metrics and all postings created throughout the campaign. Additionally, they assemble comprehensive campaign recaps at the conclusion of the campaign and work with the marketers on plans for follow-up strategies after the initial campaign has ended.
Our customers, or our account management staff acting on the customers’ behalf as part of the account management services we offer, have the ability to review the creators’ content through our platforms to verify whether or not it conforms to the requirements of the opportunity. Our platforms provide for the ability to review creators’ content prior to publishing, and all the other platforms provide for a review after the content is published. If the content does not conform, the creator is requested to make any necessary adjustments. If the creator refuses, the opportunity is deemed to have been withdrawn. Neither the customer nor our account management staff modifies creators’ content without the creators’ involvement and consent.
The value proposition we offer to both marketers and creators strengthens our position as a trusted partner and allows us to derive revenue from both customer bases. As more marketers utilize our marketplaces, we increase the breadth and depth of monetization opportunities for creators, attracting more creators and further enhancing value for our marketers.
As of December 31, 2016, we have more than 810,000 user connections from 539,000 user accounts in IZEAx. The approximate aggregate reach of those user connections is 4.7 billion, which represents the total number of non-unique fans and followers of IZEAx users. Creators in our system range from leading social influencers to accredited journalists. Our total number of user accounts may be higher than the number of our actual individual creators because some creators may have created multiple accounts. We define a user connection as a social account or blog that has been added to IZEAx under a user account. It is possible for one user to add as many user connections as they like, and it is common for talent managers and large publishers to add many connections under a single account. The aggregate reach number includes current and naturally expired OAuth connections, but does not include manual disconnects. We define naturally expired OAuth connections as a social media user authentication that has timed out for any number of reasons. Our creators currently publish sponsored content to blogs and Twitter and reach other existing platforms such as Facebook, Pinterest, Tumblr, LinkedIn, Google and Bing through syndication or sharing of that content.
We are currently limited in our ability to service the needs of all marketers and creators. We have a large number of marketers and creators that we cannot currently match for sponsorship or custom content opportunities. We believe that IZEAx should improve our ability to more efficiently match marketplace participants by providing access to more social media channels and by offering a larger inventory of quality marketers and creators. However, we are still limited byas the number of marketers and creators using our platforms to bring more liquidity and transactions to the creators in the marketplace. In October 2015, we announced the public beta of SocialLinks, a new offering inside of IZEAx. Through our research and development efforts, we are developing additional product offerings to solve this problem. Recent announcements have included SocialLinks, an affiliate marketing compensation opportunity for creators, and ContentAmp, a performance-based content syndication

compensation opportunity. SocialLinks is designed to provide creators with an ability to monetize their social channels through an affiliate marketing model which compensates them for generating sales for IZEA partners.
platform increases. To date, we have completed over 3.63.8 million social sponsorshipinfluencer and content marketing transactions for customers ranging from small local businesses to Fortune 500 companies. We consider each individual piece of custom content, sponsored blog post tweet or other status update as an individual transaction so long as the creator of that content is being compensated for such post, tweet or other status update.the transaction.
We derive the majority of our revenue from marketers for the use of our network of social media content creators to fulfill marketer sponsor requests for a blog post, tweet, click or action ("Sponsored Revenue"). We derive the remaining portion of our revenue from the creation of custom content ("Content Revenue") and from various service fees charged to marketers and creators for services, maintenance and enhancement of their accounts ("Service Fee Revenue").
Industry Background and Trends


DespiteWhen IZEA first launched PayPerPost in 2006, the inherently conversational natureconcept of a brand paying bloggers to create sponsored content on their blogs was highly controversial among both marketers and content creators. The idea was introduced at a time when there were no ads on Facebook, YouTube or Twitter, and social media was largely void of corporate marketing messages. Over the past fifteen years, the landscape has dramatically changed. Today, strategic engagement of online influencers are the table stakes for modern brands - largely in part to changes in consumer behavior and the large-scale adoption of social media platforms. Similarly, those same companies are now producing custom marketing content for their social channels and embracing influencer marketing as a means to reach their customers.

While industry research indicates that brand spending on influencer and content marketing as parthas grown dramatically in the last several years, the business processes and practices have not evolved in a meaningful way for the majority of the broader integrated marketing landscape, many marketer budgetsbuyers and
3

sellers. The markets that we operate in are currently allocated towards traditional display advertisinghighly fragmented, highly competitive, and paid search, including banner ads and text links on social sites. While most marketers understand the value of word of mouth marketing, peer recommendations, and product reviews, the industry is nascent and few understand how to effectively and efficiently engage influencers and content creators and produce custom content appropriately for these purposes. Those who engage are quicklylargely limited by the amount of effort required to adequately manage and measure a truly integrated campaign.
The influencer and content marketing categories have been limited primarily by the current inefficiencies of the market. Due to their large and highly fragmented nature,inherent in our space. Most marketers have been forced to utilize a variety of highly inefficient sourcesexecution partners and manual processes to navigate the complicated landscape, often resulting in low returns on their time investment or worse-yet, questionable results. We believe this is largely due to marketers and creators lacking an efficient way to identify and engage each other in the marketplace.a marketplace of scale.

At the same time, influencers and content creators that would likeseeking to monetize their communitycommunities and work product are faced with significant challenges in making marketers aware of their services and in finding quality marketersbrands who are motivated to sponsor them. In addition, those creators with smaller networksfollowings simply lack the individual influence and audience needed to warrant the processing of a micro-transaction. In many cases, it costs a marketer more money to issue a traditional check to a small creatornano influencer than the value of the sponsorship payment itself. Further complicating the sponsorship process for both parties are FTCfederal regulations around social media endorsements, IRS tax reporting generally applicable to anyone receiving income for services, and the associated campaign tracking required to provide compliance. While many marketers would prefer to be “part of the conversation,” we believe the complexity and cost of individual sponsorship often deters them from doing so.

We believe that addressing the current challenges in efficiency and measurable success representvia technology represents a significant opportunity for us. We addressIZEA ultimately solves these challenges with targeted, scalable marketplaces that aggregate content creators and marketers. In doing so, we offer an efficient, innovative way for creators and marketers of all sizes to find each other and form a compensated relationship.

Our Business Model

Since our inception in 2006, we have worked diligently to establish and leverage key strengths in our business model, including:

A culture of innovation and creativity.We believe the only way to survive and thrive in our rapidly changing world is to change ahead of it. We are in a state of constant evolution and re-invention; this is “The IZEA Way.” We have created a culture committed to innovation and creativity that challenges convention, takes calculated risks, and breaks new ground. IZEA team members are protective and proud of our culture by applying its “humble, yet hungry” attitude to all facets of our business. Our people and their innovations ultimately provide us with what we see as our largest competitive advantage.

First-mover advantage with a highly disruptive business model.We believe that by pioneering the social sponsorship spacemodern influencer marketing industry and investing heavily in innovation, acquisitions, and marketing, we were firsthave been able to develop positive rapport amongacquire a vast amount of industry knowledge, market insights and technology. The software foundation we have built over time is expansive with the amount of actionable data we have accumulated from our network of creators and marketers alike. This loyalty has resultedthe execution of customer programs. Those new to the space face a significant technology investment requirement and steep learning curve in consistent revenue growth and high levels of repeat business.
Scalable and leverageable operations. Our business model allows revenueorder to be derivedcompete in a varietycomplex and rapidly evolving industry.

Best in class technology. We believe that the feature sets in our platforms are among the most comprehensive for those seeking to execute influencer marketing campaigns. While our industry has a broad and fragmented set of ways, allcompetitors offering various types of which rely on our marketplace astechnology solutions, we have developed a hub. We intendcomplete, enterprise-grade solution for those seeking to introduce multiple new product offerings within IZEAx execute large scale influencer marketing campaigns from beginning to substantially decrease our operations and support expense over time as revenue grows.end.


Experienced management team, board of directors, and strategic advisors.Our management team includes not only a highly experienced team of entrepreneurs and executives from the digital media, technology, and entertainment industries, but also outstanding strategic advisory board members who are experts in social media and integrated marketing campaigns.their respective fields. See “Management”Item 10 under Part III of this Annual Report for details.

Our Growth Strategy

After tennearly fifteen years of working in and developing the influencer and content marketing categories, we believe our business model is market-tested and ready for growth.our industry is established. Our development efforts have included assembling a diverse and experienced senior management team and engineering team, launching and optimizing our proprietary marketplaces, developing a cross-platform sales force, and refining our message to the market. Key elements of our strategy to accelerate revenue growth and continue product development include:
An integrated approach.
Software + Service. IZEA’s flexible client engagement model is designed to appeal to both agency and brand customers with various need states. We believe we are the only company that can currently provide both customable to structure content creation and influencer marketing at scale. It isprograms that align with the goals, resources, and profile of our opinion that this provides a significant advantagecustomers. IZEA clients are able to license our software to run their own programs, hire our
4

team for fully outsourced managed services, or engage us in the market anda hybrid model which combines access to our software with collaborative execution.

Product development. Since 2009, we have already seen strong sales response to proposals that include both contentinvested over $28.2 million in engineering resources and sponsored social. Moving forward we believe that content revenues will playproduct development, creating a significant role in IZEA’s growth.

Large client services team. We expect the growthmeaningful competitive moat of our client development team to be the primary driver of near-term revenues. We have been developing a comprehensive on-boardingfeatures and on-going education curriculum that led to record bookings in 2016. We intend to add additional client development personnel who receive a commission for meeting sales targets to more effectively service customers throughout North America. These individuals will be based across our various offices in Winter Park, Chicago, Los Angeles and Toronto.

Strategic partnerships. We continue to develop strategic partnerships and reseller agreements with companies that can provide additional growthfunctionality in our base of creators and marketers. IZEAx is designed to be easily “white labeled,” allowing partners to operate their own “node” on the exchange. IZEAx is also designed to be resold by partners that do not require a custom-branded solution.
Product development.platform. We will continue to recruit additional engineering and product innovation team members to enhance IZEAx, Shake, and BrandGraph, and to develop new technology ideas within this platformthese platforms that complement our mission as a company. In 2017, we intend to focus our efforts on building functionality to meet partner demand, developing our mobile app and unlocking additional revenue generating opportunities utilizing our existing platforms and users through initiatives such as SocialLinks and ContentAmp.
Accretive acquisitions. We continually seek to identify and acquire companies, technologies and assets to add to our portfolio of software services that will drive additional near and long-term revenue. In July 2011, we acquired Germany’s Magpie Twitter advertising network that included a large
Large network of marketers and Twitter creators in multiple countries. In December 2012, we acquired FeaturedUsers, one of the first advertising networks specifically designed to help Twitter users grow their followers.
In January 2015, we acquired Ebyline, Inc., an online marketplace that enables publishers to accessusers. IZEA is a network of over 15,000 content creators ranging from writers to illustrators in 84 countries. Over 2,000 fully vetted individualsdriving force in the Ebyline network have professional journalism credentials with backgrounds at well-known media outlets. Ebyline’s proprietary workflow is utilized by leading media organizationsbroader “creator economy,” allowing everyone from college students and stay-at-home individuals to managecelebrities and accredited journalists the entire customer content creation process - from creator selection through electronic payment. In additionopportunity to publishers, Ebyline is leveraged by marketers to produce custom branded content for use on their owned and operated sites, as well as third party content marketing and native advertising efforts. The Ebyline technology platform has been used by publishers and brands to managemonetize their content, projects.
In July 2016, we acquired ZenContent, which developed a proprietary custom content marketing technology platform to facilitate the creation of high volume original content for businesses. ZenContent services a number of Fortune 500 e-commerce customers, amongst others. ZenContent’s proprietary tools ingest full product databases, source creatorscreativity and provide quality assurance for custom content projects, making product listings friendlier for consumers and more indexable for search. Outside of e-commerce, ZenContent also works with leading online publishers for the production of articles and text updates, including a real-time application program interface (API) that enables production of content for rapid publishing of news stories and augmentation of consumer content.



Customers

influence through our platform. As of December 31, 2016,2020, we had more than 810,000 user connections from 539,000937,000 user accounts in IZEAx. TheThese accounts have connections to over 1,040,000 social media accounts with an approximate aggregate reach of those user connections is4.7to 9.6 billion which represents the total number of non-unique fans and followers of IZEAx users. Creators in our system include leading social influencers to accredited journalists.
In creators. Our total number of user accounts may be higher than the casenumber of our managedactual individual creators because some creators may have created multiple user accounts.
Creators are able to join our platforms for free, but they may also choose to pay to upgrade their accounts to enable additional services and benefits. These individuals are compensated by us for producing content for our market clients or distributing such content on behalf of brands through their personal websites, blogs, and social media channels. We continually seek for ways to increase the ability for our creators to generate revenue.

By continually developing our creator network, we make our marketplace more attractive to our customers who seek a wide variety of creators to fulfill their content and advertising needs. As marketers utilize our marketplace to a greater extent, we typically enter intoexpect to increase the monetization opportunities for creators, which should, in turn, attract even more creators and further enhance value for our marketers.

Sales and Marketing

We primarily sell influencer marketing and custom content campaigns through our sales team and our platforms. We target regional, national and global brands, and advertising agencies in the following ways:

Client Development Team.We have a master agreement. Underclient development team each of whom is assigned a geographic region or specific markets, primarily within the master agreement,United States and Canada. The team members are responsible for identifying and managing sales opportunities to brands and agencies who are seeking to outsource some or all of the marketer may submit one or more insertion orders pursuant to which we provide services forplanning and production of requestedtheir content specificallyand advertising needs.

SaaS Sales Team. The SaaS Sales team initiates SaaS license opportunities with brands and agencies who seek to utilize additional functionality on our platforms on a self-service basis to facilitate custom content and influencer marketing campaigns.

Self-Service. IZEA offers a version of IZEAx, called IZEAx Discovery, that is tailored to customers who are focused only on the identification of influencers. Customers in need of influencer discovery software can license this technology by signing up directly with a credit card on the IZEA website without the need to speak to a sales representative. Additionally, our Shake platform is 100% self-service and has no sales team. Marketers that would like to hire creators do so by entering in their credit card information on the Shake website to purchases a “Shake” from a creator.

Industry Acumen. Our team possesses a strong marketing and advertising background. We focus our corporate marketing efforts on increasing brand awareness, communicating each of our platform advantages, generating qualified leads for the marketer orour sales team and growing our creator network, and driving self-service signups to our platforms. Our corporate marketing plan is designed to continually elevate awareness of our brand and generate demand for advertising through our creator's networksoftware and services. We rely on a number of channels in this area, including third-party social media connections. The master agreement, accordingplatforms (e.g., Facebook and YouTube), paid search engine marketing, content marketing, influencer marketing, and virtual events.

5

Customers and Revenue

We historically generated revenue from five primary sources: (1) revenue from our managed services when a marketer (typically a brand, agency or partner) pays us to provide custom content, influencer marketing, amplification or other campaign management services (“Managed Services”); (2) revenue from fees charged to software customers on their marketplace spend within our standard terms,IZEAx, Shake, and TapInfluence platforms (“Marketplace Spend Fees”); (3) revenue from fees charged to access the IZEAx, BrandGraph, Ebyline, and TapInfluence platforms (“License Fees”); (4) revenue from transactions generated by the self-service use of our Ebyline platform for professional custom content workflow (“Legacy Workflow Fees”); and (5) revenue derived from other fees such as inactivity fees, early cash-out fees, and subscription plan fees charged to users of our platforms (“Other Fees”). After the migration of the last customers from the Ebyline platform to IZEAx in December 2019, there is terminable by us or our customers upon 30 days prior written notice or immediately if a material breach has occurred thatno longer any revenue generated from Legacy Workflow Fees and all such revenue is not promptly cured.reported as Marketplace Spend Fees under the master agreementIZEAx platform.

As discussed in more detail within “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates” under Part II, Item 7 and in “Note 1. Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report, revenue from Marketplace Spend Fees and Legacy Workflow Fees is reported on a net basis and revenue from all other sources, including Managed Services, License Fees, and Other Fees are typically payable within 30 days after the date of our invoice in accordance with the terms agreed to in the applicable statement of work. The master agreement additionally provides for standard service disclaimersreported on a gross basis. We further categorize these sources into two primary groups: (1) Managed Services and limitations of liability for our benefit, as well as a reciprocal confidentiality provision. We also enter into agreements with “self-service" customers who agree to our terms of service available on the applicable online platform when they create their account. These self-service customers do not separately enter into a master agreement with us.(2) SaaS Services, which includes revenue from Marketplace Spend Fees, License Fees and Legacy Workflow Fees, and Other Fees.

We provide services to customers in multiple industry segments, including consumer products, retail/eTail,e-tail, lifestyle, technology, and travel. Our customers are predominantly located in the United States followed by Canada, India, the United Kingdom and over 150 other countries. Our business serves advertising and public relations agencies, as well as brands and businesses directly. In many cases, influencer marketing dollars flow through the advertising or public relations agency, even when we have a direct relationship with the brand.


We have only one customer who accounts for 10% or moregenerate the majority of our revenues in recent years. Gannett Co. Inc., acquired by Journal Media Group, Inc. in April 2016,revenue from our Managed Services customers. Managed Services accounted for 9.97%approximately 87% and 14.03%,81% of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Sales and Marketing

We primarily sell social sponsorship and custom content campaigns through our sales team, our self-service platforms and, to a lesser extent, by utilizing distribution relationships such as resellers, affiliates and white label partners. We target regional, national and global brands and advertising agencies in the following ways:

Client Development Team. We have a client development team each of whom is assigned a geographic region or specific marketers, primarily within the United States. The team members are responsible for identifying and managing sales opportunities in their respective target areas.

Business Development Team. We have a business development team that develops and maintains partnerships with independent resellers and distribution partners who are responsible for selling one or more of our platforms under an independent contractor relationship. We maintain two types of reseller relationships: resellers and white label partners. Resellers focus their efforts on selling a variety of marketers in geographies around the world. White label partners are complementary relationships that add additional marketers and creators to our network. We intend to increase our number of resellers and white label partners under the IZEAx technology platform.

Self-Service Platforms. Announced at IZEAFest in February 2017, ContentAmp was developed as a self-service marketplace to enable marketers and publishers of all sizes to independently access our network of creators for performance-oriented content syndication. The Ebyline platform also serves as self-service marketplace for publishers and agencies of all sizes to independently access our network of journalists a request the creation of custom content. Self-service customers extend our global reach and increase deal flow.

Referral Program. As more marketers contribute opportunities into our marketplaces, we believe we will increase the breadth and depth of the monetization value offered to our creators, attracting more creators to enroll into our platforms and thereby enhancing the value of our platforms to future marketers. IZEAx contains a program designed to compensate social media content creators for referring other creators to join these platforms. In these programs, we incur the cost to pay a referral fee to the referrer equal to 2.5%-10% of the referee's earnings for up to a two-year period. Directly trackable creator referrals are new creator signups that we receive as the result of a current creator sharing a unique tracking link to our platform. The link allows us to determine how a new creator learned about our platform. We paid referral fees to creators approximating $70,000 and $46,000 in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These programs amplify our marketing dollars and decrease the investment required to attract new creators.

Industry Acumen. Our team possesses a strong marketing and advertising background. We focus our corporate marketing efforts on increasing brand awareness, communicating each of our platform advantages, generating qualified leads for our sales team and growing our creator network. Our corporate marketing plan is designed to continually elevate awareness of our brand and generate demand for social sponsorship. We rely on a number of channels in this area, including tradeshows, third party social media platforms (e.g., Facebook and Twitter), IZEA-hosted community events, paid searches, content marketing, influencer marketing and our corporate websites.

Revenue Model

We derive revenue from three sources: revenue from a marketer when it pays for a social media publisher or influencer such as a blogger or tweeter ("creators") to share sponsored content with their social network audience ("Sponsored Revenue"), revenue when a publisher or company purchases custom branded content for its own use, as well as third party content marketing and native advertising efforts ("Content Revenue") and revenue derived from various service and license fees charged to users of our platforms ("Service Fee Revenue").

We earn Sponsored Revenue either on a per post or action basis from opportunities created by marketers using our platforms or on an advertising campaign basis where we manage the entire campaign for our customers, often using multiple platforms to accomplish a full influencer marketing campaign. Marketers may prepay for services by placing a deposit in their account with us.  The deposits are typically paid by the marketer through the use of checks, wire transfers or credit cards. Typically, for each dollar a marketer spends with us for sponsored services, approximately 50% of it goes to our social media content creators. Celebrity creators typically retain a higher percentage of each transaction due to the higher base price associated with these sponsorships.

Sponsored Revenue is recognized and considered earned after a marketer's sponsored content is posted through IZEAx and shared through a creator's social network for a requisite period of time. The requisite period ranges from 3 days for a tweet to 30 days for a blog, video or other form of custom content. Revenue is only recorded upon successful completion of these actions. If the action was not successful, the marketer's account would not be charged and no revenue would be recorded. IZEAx can be activated and used in a self-service fashion or with the assistance of our account management team. Management fees related to Sponsored Revenue from advertising campaigns managed by us are recognized ratably over the term of the campaign which may range from a few days to months. Sponsored Revenue accounted for 61% and 60% of our total revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively.

Content Revenue is recognized when the content is delivered to and accepted by the customer. Content revenue SaaS Services accounted for 37%approximately 13% and 39%19% of our total revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively.

Service Fee Revenue is generated when feesChanges in how we control and manage our platforms, our contractual terms, our business practices, or other changes in accounting standards or interpretations, may change the reporting of our revenue. See “Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for more information as it relates to our revenue recognition policies.

Our customers are charged to customers primarily related to subscription fees for different levels of service within a platform, licensing fees for white-label use of IZEAx, early cash-out fees if a creator wishes to take proceeds earned for services from their account whenpredominantly located in the account balance is below certain minimum balance thresholdsUnited States and inactivity fees for dormant accounts.Canada. We set certain minimum cash-out balance thresholds, typically $50, to encourage creators to help us better manage the time, Paypal fees and administrative costshad one customer that are associated with each cash-out by creators. Once a creator's account balance exceeds the minimum balance, they can request to be paid without incurring a fee. Service Fee Revenue is recognized immediately when the service is performed or at the time an account becomes dormant or is cashed out. Service Fee Revenue for subscription or licensing fees are recognized straight-line over the term of service. Self-service marketers must prepay for services by placing a deposit in their account with us.  The deposits are typically paid by the marketer via credit card. Marketers who use us to manage their social advertising campaigns or custom content requests may prepay for services or request credit terms. Payments received or billings in advance of services are recorded as unearned revenue until earned as described above. Service Fee Revenue accounted for 2% and 1%12% of our total revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and no customer that accounted for more than 10% of our revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

As IZEAx continues to gain adoption2019. Revenue from our marketers, creatorsCanadian customers accounted for approximately $1.1 million (6%) and partners in future periods, we anticipate additional forms$1.6 million (8%) of revenue streams including subscription fees, listing fees, licensing fees and sponsored search fees as a result of new functionality built intoour revenues during the platform.

We were able to achieve gross margins on all our products of approximately 48% and 40% for the yearstwelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively. As part of our commitment to increase shareholder value, we are constantly seeking methods to further increase margins by implementing technology advancements and adjusting our revenue mix to focus on higher margin opportunities. The mix of sales between our higher margin managed services for Sponsored Revenue and our lower margin self-service workflow portion of Content Revenue has a significant affect on our overall gross profit

percentage. As a result of the changes in our sales mix and an increase in managed services, we expect that our margins will average 47% to 48% for the foreseeable future.


Technology


IZEAx and Shake spans multiple social networks blogs and YouTube.digital creative services. We aggregate our creators in IZEAxour platforms, which allows us to create scale and targetingchoice for our marketers. We provide the ability to targetfind and collaborate with our creators based on a variety of software rules, filters, and filters. We providedata enrichment. Our self-service platforms that service all business types and sizes. Unlike traditional public relations, marketers only pay for completed posts.sizes, ranging from Fortune 500 customers to small agencies and brands. We provide trackable results for influencer marketing campaigns by automatically embedding tracking links and pixels, as well as support, for third-party tracking (such as DART). Wetracking. IZEA technology also provideprovides content review and approval, dashboards for real-time reporting providing immediate feedback.and digital asset management.


Privacy and Security


We are committed to protecting the personal privacy reputations and dignity of our marketers and creators. Accordingly, we have invested heavily in many areas to prevent the misuse of information that we collect. We do not misuse personally identifiableAny personal information that we collect is processed in accordance with our Privacy Notice, and we useemploy reasonable and suitableappropriate administrative, physical, electronic and managerialtechnical safeguards to protect suchthe personal information.



6

Product Development


Our product development team is responsible for platform and infrastructure development, application development, user interface and application design, enterprise connectivity, Internet applications and design, quality assurance, documentation, and release management. One of our core strengths is our knowledge of and experience in launching and operating scalable content and influencer marketing marketplaces. Our product development expenses consisting primarily ofinclude salaries, paidbonuses, commissions, stock-based compensation, employee benefit costs, and miscellaneous departmental costs related to our development personnelteam along with hosting and included in general and administrative expenses,software subscription costs. These costs were approximately $2,738,000$3.8 million and $1,942,000$4.2 million, for the years ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015, respectively.2019, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expense.


We launched a public beta version of IZEA.com powered by TheIZEA Exchange (IZEAx) in March 2014 and unveiled our latest version 2.03.0 of the platform in February 2017. IZEAx is designed to provide a unified ecosystem that enables the creation of multiple types of content including blog posts, status updates, videos and photos through a wide variety of social channels including blogs, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Tumblr, among others. The system is available to our customers and partners via a self-serve portal, as a managed service or as a licensed white label.April 2019. We continue to add new features and additional functionality to this platform each year. These new features will enable our platform to facilitate the contracting, workflow, and delivery of direct content as well as provide for invoicing, collaborating and direct payments for our SaaS customers. We incurred and capitalized software development costs of $471,219$363,793 and $452,571$590,549 in our balance sheet during the years ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively.

Our team believes that constantrelentless innovation is the only way to achieve long-term growth and our intention is to focus allwe consistently invest in new technology both inside and outside of our engineering resources oncurrent software platforms. The launch of Shake and BrandGraph during the IZEAx platform for the foreseeable future. Wepandemic in 2020 underscores that commitment, and we intend to continue to invest in the creation of new technology additions that complement our core offerings.


Competition


We face competition from multiple companies in the social sponsorship industry.influencer and content marketing categories. Direct and indirect competitors in the social sponsorshipinfluencer marketing space include Facebook, Twitter,TikTok, YouTube, BlogHer, TapInfluenceLinqia and Collective Bias.Upfluence. We also face competition in the content spacecreator economy from companies such as Contently, NewscredFiverr and Scripted.Upwork. In addition, there are a number of traditional advertising agencies, public relations firms, and niche consultancies that provide content development and conduct manual influencer outreach programs.


Competition for advertising placements among current and future suppliers of Internet navigational and informational services, high traffic websites and social sponsorship providers, as well as competition with other media for native advertising placements, could result in significant price competition,pressure, declining margins, and reductions in advertisingour revenue. In addition, as we continue our efforts to expand the scope of our services with IZEAx, Shake, and BrandGraph, we may compete with a greater number of other companies across an increasing range of different services, including in vertical markets where competitors may have advantages in expertise, brand recognition, and other areas. If existing or future competitors develop or offer products or services that provide significant performance, price, creative or other advantages over those offered by us, our business, prospects, results of operations, and financial condition could be negatively affected.



We also compete with traditional advertising media such as direct mail, television, radio, cable, and print for a share of marketers' total advertising budgets. Many current and potential competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, such as longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases, greater access to advertising space on high-traffic websites, and significantly greater financial, technical, sales, and marketing resources.


Proprietary Rights


Proprietary rights are important to our success and our competitive position. To protectevolve and secure our proprietary rights, we rely on intellectual property and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures, and contractual provisions.


We currently ownAs of December 31, 2020, we owned 54 trademarks (37 domestic trademark registrations 13 foreign registrations, and have 7 total pending applications (3 in the United States and 4 foreign). We have abandoned approximately 20 other U.S. applications. In the United States, we own 31 trademarks registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), including "Blogger's Choice Awards," "Champion the Creators," "Connecting Creators and Brands," “ContentAmp,” “Ebyline,” "FanAds," "Get Everyone Talking," “Influence Rank,” "InPostLinks," "IZEA," "IZEA Exchange," "IZEAx," "Native Ad Exchange," "PayPerPost," "Postie," "Selective Syndication," “ShareMonitor,” "SocialSpark," "SoundAmp," "Sponsored Music," "Sponsored Social," “Sponsored Stream,” "Sponsorship Marketplace," "Staree," “The Content Marketplace,” "The Creator Marketplace," "Total Social Value,""Virtual Newsroom," "We Reward (Design)," and have acquired “ZenContent.” We also own17 foreign trademark registrations for "Izea" on the International Register in Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Cuba, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Russian Federation, Switzerland,Register), and the European Union.

In addition to these registered marks, we currently havehad 4 total pending foreign applications for the mark "Izea" in Brazil, Iceland, Israel, and Mexico, with the intention of filing additional applications in both the United States. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we abandoned 8 inactive U.S. and foreign countries wheretrademarks. As of December 31, 2020, we have a bona fide commercial interest.

We also ownowned approximately 470339 domain names related to the various aspects of IZEA’s products and services.


We actively protect our intellectual property rights but have encountered challenges following the U.S. Supreme Court decisiondecisions in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. __,U.S.208, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014) and Intellectual Ventures I LLC vs. Symantec Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2016),which changed the patent environment for software-based applications. As a result, given the difficulty in overcoming USPTOU.S. Patent and Trademark Office rejections of certain of the Corporation'sour pending patent applications, management has decided not to actively pursue, the remainingat this time, patent applications but to let them naturally expire over the coming months.protection for our software-based applications. We met with similar resistance in Australia, Canada,seeking patent protection for our software-based applications internationally and the European Union, and so have abandoned pursuit of those applications as well. However, IZEA has aour pending foreign patent application in Brazil which it retains.Brazil.


We cannot provide any assurance that our proprietary rights with respect to our products or services will be viable or have value in the future since the validity, enforceability and type
7

Table of protection of proprietary rights in Internet-related industries are uncertain and still evolving.Contents

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and while we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products exists, software piracy can be expected to be a persistent problem. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States, and effective copyright, trademark, trade secret and patent protection may not be available in those jurisdictions. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate to protect us from the infringement or misappropriation of such rights by others.

Further, in recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights, particularly in the software and Internet-related industries. We can and have been subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of our competitors grows and our products and services overlap with competitive offerings. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive to defend and could divert management's attention from operating our Company. If we become liable to third parties for infringing their intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay a substantial award of damages and to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products that contain the infringing intellectual property. We may be unable to develop non-infringing technology or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.




Government Regulation


We are subject to a number of foreign and domestic laws and regulations that affect companies conducting business on the Internet, many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted by regulators or in the courts in ways that could harmadversely affect our business.business model. In the United States and abroad, laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties are currently being tested by a number of claims. These regulations and laws may involve taxation, tariffs, creator privacy and data protection, consumer protection, content, copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, the provision ofand online payment services and the characteristics and quality of services. It is not entirely clear how existing laws which govern issues such as property ownership, taxation, export or import matters and personal privacy apply to the Internet, as the vast majority of these laws were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet and do not contemplate or address the unique issues raised by the Internet or e-commerce. In addition, it is possible that governments of one or more countries may seek to censor content available on our platforms or may even attempt to completely block access to our platforms. Accordingly, adverse legal or regulatory developments could substantially harm our business.


ManyWe are subject to a variety of federal, state, and international laws and regulations governing privacy, information security, and data protection laws (“Privacy Laws”). Legislators and/or regulators in countries in which we operate are increasingly adopting or revising Privacy Laws. All U.S. states have passed data breach notification laws requiring notificationand others have adopted or expanded laws and regulations that address the security of personal information and the collection and use of personal information through websites. In particular, California passed a broad-reaching consumer privacy law in June 2018 which went into effect January 1, 2020, called the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). In response to subscribersthe CCPA, IZEA posted an updated California Privacy Notice on its websites. Virginia’s Consumer Data Protection Act (“CDPA”) will come into effect January 1, 2023, which is also when therethe California Privacy Rights and Enforcement Act of 2020 (“CPRA”) will take effect.The U.S. Congress also is considering implementation of a security breach of personally identifiable data. There are also a number of legislative proposals pending beforenational Privacy Law. Outside the U.S. Congress, various state legislative bodies, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which became effective May 25, 2018, has extra-territorial scope and foreign governments concerning data protection.substantial fines (up to 4% of global annual revenue or €20M, whichever is greater). In addition,2018, Brazil passed a law similar to GDPR and other countries are considering similar laws. Enforcement of Privacy Laws also has increased over the past few years. Accordingly, new and revised Privacy Laws, together with stepped-up enforcement of existing Privacy Laws, could significantly affect our current and planned privacy, data protection laws in Europe and other jurisdictions outside the United States can be more restrictive than those within the United States,information security-related practices, our collection, use, sharing, retention and the interpretation and applicationsafeguarding of these laws are still uncertain and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, this could result in an order requiring that we changeconsumer and/or abandon certainemployee information, and some of our then-existing data practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business. current or planned business activities.

Furthermore, the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act has provisions that limit, but do not necessarily eliminate, our liability for linking to third-party websites that contain materials whichthat infringe copyrights or other intellectual property rights of third parties, so long as we comply with the statutory requirements of this act. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.


We, as anyan e-commerce service provider, are subject to FTC and various state rules and regulations onSection 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 (the “FTC Act”), which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices, including advertising and marketing on the Internet. At the state level, a majority of states have consumer protection laws similar to the FTC Act that also prohibit unfair and deceptive business practices. In certain cases, we are retained by marketers to manage their advertising campaigns through our platforms, thereby increasing our exposure as not only the service provider but also the medium through which advertisements are broadcast. In addition to those requirements, the marketers, creators, and agencies that use our platforms are subject to specific guidance and regulations regarding online advertising, such as the FTC's Dot Com Disclosures - Information about Online Advertising, issued by the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), the FTC’s Enforcement Policy Statement on Deceptively Formatted Advertisements, issued in 2015, and itsthe FTC’s Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising (known as the Guides) thatEndorsement Guide) which were adopted in 2009, updated and reissued by the FTC in 2013, and further clarified in 2015. Each of the foregoing2015 and are sub-categories that have been taken up by the FTC under the FTC Act to prevent "unfair or deceptive acts and practices" within advertising. These new Guides,regularly enforced. The Endorsement Guide, for example, significantly extendextends the scope of potential liability associated with the use of testimonials and endorsements, including injecting endorsement requirements into advertising methods such as blogging, posting on Instagram, tweeting, and other online posting of sponsored advertisements by a creator. In particular, the Guides provideEndorsement Guide provides that creators must always clearly and conspicuously disclose the material connection between the creator and the marketer, such as if they received consideration for blogging or posting about a particular product, service, brand or the like, whether the consideration comprises something tangible (i.e., cash, discounts, objects that are provided to them at no cost, even for testing purposes) or intangible (such as accolades and more prominent future blogging or posting opportunities). In addition, the creator must not make claims about the product or service he or she is discussing that go beyond what the marketer could say about the product or service. The GuidesEndorsement Guide further provideprovides that the marketer should ensure that creators speaking on its behalf are provided guidance and training needed to ensure their claims, statements and representations are truthful, transparent and properly substantiated, and monitor the activities of creators speaking on its behalf. In the eventIf a creator, blogger, agency or marketer should fail to comply with the Dot Com Disclosures, the GuidesEndorsement Guide or any other FTC rule, regulation or policy, which may be manifest by making deceptive, misleading or unsubstantiated claims and representations, failing to disclose a sponsorship relationship or otherwise, then various parties related to the advertising campaign (including the service provider of the platform over which the campaign is managed) may be subject to liability as a result of such non-compliance. In the event it was found that we (or anone of our marketer customer) customers)
8

failed to comply with the FTC Act or state advertising rules,consumer protection laws, it could result in the potential imposition of equitable redress or penalties that could include monetary damages, a modification of certain business practices, or an order to cease certain aspects of our operations. Other countries, such as Canada and EU member states, also have laws, regulations and rules that mirror the FTC Endorsement Guide and similar consumer protection laws and guidance.


More generally, if there is negative consumer perception and mistrust of the practice of undisclosed compensation tocompensating creators to endorse the marketers' specific products, then this could resultmarketers may become less interested in a reduction by marketers in the use ofusing influencer marketing platforms like ours as a means for advertising which could, have a material adverse effect onin turn, materially adversely affect our business and financial results.
    

We follow the 1995 European Union Data Protection Directive with regard to data we collect from users located in the European Union and are currently monitoring changes required by the recently adopted General Data Protection Regulation, which will supersede the Data Protection Directive as of May 25, 2018, to ensure that we are compliant with relevant requirements when and to the extent they are implemented.

As a governing member of a leading marketing and advertising industry association, the Word of Mouth Marketing Association (WOMMA), we are committed to promoting ethical social sponsorship practices and have established terms of service for users of our platforms, which refer to the FTC GuidesEndorsement Guide and include one or more of the following:


Mandatory Disclosure. We mandateOur terms of service require the disclosure of the sponsored relationship between the marketer and creator. ABy default, a sponsorship cannot be published through the platform unless a phrase or paragraph disclosing the sponsored relationship is included. For example, a creator is required to select one of a number of disclosure phrases such as “sponsored,” “advertisement” or “ad” prior to the publication of a tweet or a post. Other social sponsorship forms may be monitored through a Disclosure Audit tool that monitors posts on an ongoing basis to make sure they continue to include disclosure after the initial posts are approved. Failure to disclose the sponsored relationship is a violation of our terms of service, which may result in the withholding of payment for the sponsorship and the creator being removed from our network.


Freedom of Choice.Creators are free to choose which sponsorships to publish. Our platforms do not auto-inject ana marketer's message into an influencer's social media network.


Authentic Voice.We encourage honesty of opinion in the selection of sponsorships by a creator and similarly we encourage marketers to create opportunities that allow the creator to write the sponsorship in their own words, provided that a creator always adheres to our terms of service and code of ethics which includes disclosing their sponsored relationships at all times while using any of the platforms.


Transparency of Identity.Our platforms are designed to be open, safe environment for our marketers, creators, and users. In fact, we do not cloak the identities of marketers or creators. Both parties involved in a potential transaction can see each other's profiles and make informed decisions before engaging with each other.


Pre-Publication Marketer Review.Marketers may choose to review their sponsored content before it is published and to request a change to the sponsored content prior to publication in the case of factual inaccuracies.


Reporting Violations.We have zero tolerance for violations of our terms of service and encourage the reporting of violations directly to IZEA. If violations are reported, we promptly investigate them and in appropriate cases, marketers, creators, and users are removed from our network and prohibited from using our sites. In addition, we take an active role in reporting spam accounts to Twitter and Facebook.


We also believe, and have subsequently included requirements within our terms of service, based on positions taken by certain federal courts and the FTC, that communications and messages disseminated by creators through social media networksour platform users are subject to and must comply at all times with CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act) requirements.


To date, we have not been materially impacted by the rules governing messaging over social media networks and social sponsorship, including the CAN-SPAM Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991. However, we cannot predict the impact of future regulations on us ourand marketers or ourand creators thatwho use our platforms, ornor can we predict the impact of attempts to circumvent our mechanisms that are designed to ensure compliance.


Employees


As of March 24, 2017,December 31, 2020, we had a total of 135107 employees, of which 104 were full-time employees, including 9246 in sales and marketing, 3019 in product engineeringcampaign fulfillment, 29 in technology and 13development, and 10 in administration and finance. None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement, nor have we experienced any work stoppage. We consider our relationsrelationship with our employees to be good. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract and retain highly qualified engineers, graphic designers, computer scientists, sales and marketing, account management, and senior management personnel.


Corporate
9

Available Information
    
IZEA was founded in February 2006 under the name PayPerPost, Inc. and became a public company incorporated in the state of Nevada in May 2011. In January 2015,Effective August 20, 2018, we purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Ebyline, Inc.

and in July 2016, we purchased all the outstanding shares of capital stock of ZenContent, Inc. These entities, which aid inchanged our management and production of custom branded content, now operate as wholly-owned subsidiaries undername from IZEA, Inc. On March 9, 2016, we formedto IZEA Canada,Worldwide, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of IZEA, Inc. incorporated in Ontario, Canada to operate as a sales and support office for our Canadian customers and partners.

Our executive offices are located at 480501 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 200,313, PMB 247 Winter Park, FL 32789 and our telephone number is (407) 674-6911. We maintain a corporate website at https://izea.com. We provideOur Annual Report, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, including exhibits, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free access to various reports that we file with or furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission throughof charge on our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with or furnished. These reports include, but are not limitedfurnished to our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K,the U.S. Securities and any amendments to those reports.Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our SEC reports and other filings can be accessed through the investors section of our website, or through https://www.sec.gov. Information on our website does not constitute part of this annual report on Form10-KAnnual Report or any other report we file or furnish with the SEC.


Investors and others should note that we use social media to communicate with our subscribers and the public about our Company, our services, new product developments and other matters. Any information that we consider to be material to an investor's evaluation of our Company will be included in filings onaccessible through the SEC EDGAR website, and may also be disseminated using our investor relations website (https://izea.com) and press releases. However, we encourage investors, the media, and others interested in our Company to also review our social media channels @izea on Twitter, @izea on Instagram, and izeaincIZEA on Facebook. The information contained in these social media channels is not part of, and is not incorporated into or included in, this annual report on Form 10-K.Annual Report.





10

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

In addition toYou should carefully consider the information set forth atfactors discussed under this item regarding the beginning of Management's Discussion and Analysis entitled "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information," you should consider that there are numerous and varied risks, known and unknown, that may prevent us from achieving our goals. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operation may be materially and adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and investors could lose all or part of their investment. These risk factors may not identify all risks that we face, and our operations could also be affected by factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our operations.

Risks Related to our Business and Industry
 
We have a history of annual net losses, expect future losses and cannot assure you that we will achieve profitability.
 
We have incurred significant net losses and negative cash flow from operations for most periods since our inception, which has resulted in a total accumulated deficit of $41,809,721$70,634,776 as of December 31, 2016.2020. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016,2020, we had a net loss of $7,560,200,$10,250,007, including a $7,476,344$10,233,703 loss from operations and we expect to incur a net loss for the fiscal year 2017.  Although our revenue has increased since inception, weoperations. We have not achieved profitability and cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain these growth rates or realize sufficient revenue to achieve profitability. If we achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain it. Therefore, we may need to raise capital through new financings, which could include equity financing, such as additional issuances of common stock under our at the market offering program, which may be dilutive to stockholders, or debt financing, which would likely restrict our ability to borrow from other sources. In addition, securities we issue may contain rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the rights of our current stockholders. There can be no assurance that additional funds will be available on terms attractive to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to curtail or reduce our operations or forced to sell or dispose of our rights or assets. An inability to raise adequate funds on commercially reasonable terms would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation, and financial condition, including the possibility that a lack of funds could cause our business to fail and liquidate with little or no return to investors.


Our business has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the continuing impacts of COVID-19 are highly unpredictable and could have a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows in the future.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. As the disease spread throughout the United States, we directed all of our staff to work from home effective March 16, 2020 and subsequently did not renew leases for our headquarters and temporary office spaces to reduce fixed costs. We intend to have all employees work remotely for the foreseeable future to protect their health and safety. We believe our business operations and ability to support our customers are fully functional while our employees are working from remote locations; however, their productivity and efficiency may be negatively affected, and we may face increased risk of interruptions. Although countries have begun to distribute vaccinations, many countries face challenges in doing so and new variants of COVID-19 have been identified, and it is uncertain how quickly and effectively such vaccinations will help to control the spread of COVID-19. Therefore, there remains uncertainty around the duration and the total economic impact of the pandemic.

Our business relies heavily on people, and adverse events such as health-related concerns and changes in family working conditions experienced by our employees, the inability to travel and other matters affecting the general work environment have impacted our business near term. We have changed the way we interact with our customers and pivoted to provide alternative forms of advertising for our customer campaigns as large social gatherings were cancelled during the year. The economic conditions caused by COVID-19 have negatively impacted the business activity of our customers, and we have observed declining demand and changes in their advertising decisions, timing, and spending priorities, which have had a negative impact to our sales. We cannot fully quantify the impact to our business operations as a result of COVID-19 at this time. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all the ways in which the current global health crisis and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.

The outbreak and attempts to slow the spread of COVID-19 have resulted in extreme volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets, and future trends remain uncertain. A severe or prolonged economic downturn could result in a variety of additional risks to our business, including weakened demand from our customers and delays in client payments.

We have not extended our monthly arrangements for flexible office space in our remote offices, nor signed a new lease for our headquarters, which could negatively impact our business.

11

In light of the uncertain and rapidly evolving situation relating to the spread of the COVID-19 - specifically stay-at-home orders imposed by certain states and localities - we did not enter into a new lease for our corporate headquarters in Winter Park, Florida and our Canadian headquarters in Toronto, Canada, for which both leases expired on April 30, 2020. Additionally, we have vacated the various co-working facilities our team members used around the country as their terms expired during 2020. As a result, our management team and all of our employees are working remotely. While our employees are accustomed to working with other remote employees and customers, our workforce had not been fully remote prior to March 16, 2020, when we proactively instituted a work-from-home policy in response to COVID-19 concerns. Although we continue to monitor the situation and may adjust our current plans as more information and guidance become available, not doing business in-person could negatively impact our marketing efforts, challenge our ability to enter into customer contracts in a timely manner, give rise to cybersecurity issues, slow down our recruiting efforts, or create operational or other challenges as we adjust to a fully-remote workforce, any of which could harm our business. Additionally, when we determine it prudent to end or modify our work-from-home policy, we will consider entering into a new lease for office space and/or arrangements for the use of co-working facilities. Although we believe suitable office space will be readily available when this time comes, we may encounter difficulties or delays in finalizing the terms of such lease arrangements or in obtaining rent prices at acceptable rates.

Impairment of our intangible assets has resulted in significant charges that adversely impact our operating results.

We assess the potential impairment of goodwill on an annual basis, as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In March 2020, we identified a triggering event due to the reduction in projected revenue related to COVID-19 and the continuation of a market capitalization below our carrying value and uncertainty for recovery given the volatility of the capital markets surrounding COVID-19. We performed an interim assessment of goodwill and determined that the carrying value of the Company’s reporting unit as of March 31, 2020 exceeded the fair value. Therefore, we recorded a $4.3 million impairment of goodwill in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors could result in further impairment charges that would impact our results of operations and financial position in the reporting period identified.

We make numerous estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies and these estimates create complexity in our accounting. If our accounting is erroneous or based on assumptions that change or prove to be incorrect, our operating results could change from investor expectations, which could cause our stock price to fall.

We are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. Such estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, judgments related to revenue recognition, stock based compensation, credit risk, and values surrounding software development, intangible assets and goodwill, and their economic useful lives.
Various factors contribute to complexity in our accounting. For example, the recognition of our revenue is governed by certain criteria that determine whether we report revenue either on a gross basis, as a principal, or net basis, as an agent, depending upon the nature of the sales transaction. Changes in how we control and manage our platforms, our contractual terms, our business practices, or other changes in accounting standards or interpretations, may change the reporting of our revenue on a gross to net or net to gross basis. As a result, we may experience significant fluctuations in our revenue depending on the nature of our sales and our reporting of such revenue and related accounting treatment, without any change in our underlying business or net income. Our guidance or estimates about the combination of gross or net revenue are based upon the volumes and characteristics that we believe will be the mix of revenue during the period. Those estimates and assumptions may be inaccurate when made or may be rendered inaccurate by subsequent changes in circumstances, such as changing the characteristics of our offerings or particular transactions in response to client demands, market developments, regulatory pressures, acquisitions, and other factors. In addition, we may incorrectly extrapolate from revenue recognition treatment of prior transactions to future transactions that we believe are similar, but that ultimately are determined to have different characteristics that dictate different revenue reporting treatment. These factors may make our financial reporting more complex and difficult for investors to understand, may make comparison of our results of operations to prior periods or other companies more difficult, may make it more difficult for us to give accurate guidance, and could increase the potential for reporting errors.

Further, our acquisitions have imposed purchase accounting requirements, required us to integrate accounting personnel, systems, and processes, necessitated various consolidation and elimination adjustments, and imposed additional filing and audit requirements. Ongoing evolution of our business, changes in underlying GAAP and any future acquisitions, will compound these complexities. Our operating results may be adversely affected if we make accounting errors or our judgments prove to be wrong, assumptions change or actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below investor expectations or guidance we may have provided, resulting in a decline in our stock price and potential legal claims.
12


Historically, we have not relied upon patents to protect our proprietary technology, and our competitors may be able to offer similar products andservices, which would harm our competitive position.

Our success depends upon our proprietary technology. We do not have registered patents on any of our current platforms because we have determined that the costs of patent prosecution outweigh the benefits given the alternative of reliance upon copyright law to protect our computer code and other proprietary technology and properties. In addition to copyright laws, we rely upon service mark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to establish and protect our proprietary rights. As part of our confidentiality procedures, we enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees and consultants. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary or develop similar technology independently. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and while we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products exists, software piracy can be expected to be a persistent problem. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States, and effective copyright, trademark, trade secret and patent protection may not be available in those jurisdictions. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate to protect us from the infringement or misappropriation of such rights by others, and we cannot assure you that that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products and services, or design around any intellectual property rights we hold.

We cannot provide any assurance that our proprietary rights with respect to our products or services will be viable or have value in the future since the validity, enforceability, and type of protection of proprietary rights in Internet-related industries are uncertain and still evolving.

If third parties claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights, it may result in costly litigation.

We cannot assure you that third parties will not claim our current or future products or services infringe their intellectual property rights. Any such claims, with or without merit, could cause costly litigation that could consume significant management time. As the number of product and services offerings in our market increases and functionalities increasingly overlap, companies such as ours may become increasingly subject to infringement claims. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive to defend and could divert management's attention from operating our business. These claims also might require us to enter into royalty or license agreements. If required, we may not be able to obtain such royalty or license agreements, or obtain them on terms acceptable to us.

Further, in recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights, particularly in the software and Internet-related industries. If we become liable to third parties for infringing their intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay a substantial award of damages and to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products that contain the infringing intellectual property. We may be unable to develop non-infringing technology or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

Intense competition in our target markets could impair our ability to grow and to achieve profitability.
The market for influencer and content marketing is highly competitive. We expect this competition to continue to increase, in part because there are no significant barriers to entry to our industry for those that operate in a Managed Services or an agency-type model. Increased competition may result in reduced pricing for managed campaigns, reduced margins and reduced revenue as a result of lost market share. Our principal competitors include other companies that provide marketers with Internet advertising solutions and companies that offer pay per click search services.
Within the enterprise software unit of IZEA’s business (“SaaS Services”), while there is a higher technological barrier to entry, IZEA is vulnerable to new entrants with access to fresh capital and the ability to replicate upon previous research and development investments made by us. This is particularly challenging given the minimal opportunity to protect our internet-based software via patents.

We also compete with traditional advertising media, such as direct mail, television, radio, cable, and print for a share of marketers' total advertising budgets. Many current and potential competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, such as longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases, greater access to advertising space on high-traffic websites, and significantly greater financial, technical, sales, and marketing resources. As a result, we may be unable to compete successfully. If we fail to retain existingcompete successfully, we could lose customers or add new customers,and our revenue and results of operations could decline.

13

In addition, as we continue our efforts to expand the scope of our services, we may compete with a greater number of other media companies across an increasing range of different services, including in vertical markets where competitors may have advantages in expertise, brand recognition and other areas. If existing or future competitors develop or offer products or services that provide significant performance, price, creative or other advantages over those offered by us, our business, prospects, results of operations, and financial condition could be negatively affected.

We are continuing to develop our IZEAx platform and have transitioned certain features and customers from our legacy Ebyline and TapInfluence platforms. Our updated IZEAx, Shake, and BrandGraph platforms may not achieve sufficient market acceptance to be commercially viable for open marketplace or SaaS services.

In April 2019, we released version 3.0 of IZEAx, which allows marketers to make offers that require a single creator to complete multiple tasks or deliverables. Throughout the remainder of 2019, we continued to add additional features to support our SaaS partners and integrate the Ebyline and TapInfluence platform offerings for custom content services within our IZEAx platform. By the end of 2019, nearly all of the Ebyline and TapInfluence customers and creators were migrated off of those platforms and onto the IZEAx platform. With the merging of the two platforms into IZEAx there is a risk of decreased revenue from marketers if they do not understand the changes or do not believe that the IZEAx platform can provide them with a similar or improved service from what they received in the Ebyline or TapInfluence platforms. If our marketers and creators do not perceive this platform to be of high value and quality, we may not be able to retain them or acquire new marketers and creators.

Shake and BrandGraph were both officially launched in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to invest significant engineering resources into the development and improvement of these platforms and the creation of new technology additions that complement our core offerings. The Shake and BrandGraph platforms and models are new to IZEA and we are still in the very early days of building a customer base for these products. We may fail to achieve significant marketplace inventory in Shake to attract enough buyers and we may fail to create enough product differentiation among social data platforms to drive adoption of BrandGraph. We cannot provide any assurances of the short or long-term commercial success or growth of our platforms. There is no assurance that the amount of money being allocated for the platforms will be harmed.sufficient to complete them, or that such completion will result in a competitive edge, significant revenues or profit for us.

We depend on our ability to attract and retain customers that are prepared to offer products or services on compelling terms through IZEAx and Shake. Additionally, we rely on customersmarketers who purchase direct custom content from our creators in our platforms. We must continue to attract and retain customers in order to increase revenue and achieve profitability. We had one customerIf existing or future competitors develop or offer products or services that accountedprovide significant performance, price, creative or other advantages over this platform, demand for nearly 10% and another customer that accounted for 8% of our revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. The loss of either of these customers or a significant reduction in revenue from either of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation. Moreover, if customers do not find our marketing and promotional services effective, they are not satisfied with content they receive, or they do not believe that utilizing our platforms provides them with a long-term increase in value, revenue or profit, they may stop using our platforms or managed services.decrease. In addition, we may experience attrition in our customers in the ordinary course of business resulting from several factors, including losses to competitors, mergers, closures or bankruptcies. If we are unable to attract new customers in numbers sufficient to grow our business, or if too many customers are unwilling to offer products or services with compelling terms to our creators through our platforms, orof if too many large customers seek extended payment terms,creators stop offering their services through our platform, our operating results will be adversely affected.


We are developing a new platform to process allOur total number of user accounts may be higher than the number of our existing business transactionsactual individual marketers or creators and grow our operations, but cannot provide any assurance regarding its commercial success.may not be representative of the number of persons who are active users.


We are continuing to develop our primary Our total number of user accounts in the IZEAx and Shake platform IZEAx, and we intend to focus allmay be higher than the number of our engineering resources on the IZEAx platform for the foreseeable future. Throughout 2017, we will continue to add additional features to support SaaS white-label partners and integrate the Ebyline platform offerings for custom content services within our IZEAx platform. We are spending a significant amount of time and resources on the development of this platform, but we cannot provide any assurances of its short or long-term commercial success or growth. There is no assurance that the amount of money being allocated for the platform will be sufficient to complete it, or that such completion will result in significant revenues or profit for us. There is a risk that the merging of our Ebyline customers into IZEAx will result in a decrease in revenue related to the self-service content business if the customers do not understand the changes or do not believe that the IZEAx platform can provide them with a similar or improved service from what they received in the Ebyline platform. If ouractual individual marketers and creators do not perceive this platformbecause some may have created multiple accounts for different purposes, including different user connections. We define a user connection as a social account or blog that has been added to be of high valueIZEAx and quality, we may not be ableShake under a user account. It is possible for one user to retain them or acquire new marketersadd as many user connections as they like, and creators. Additionally, if existing or future competitors develop or offer products or services that provide significant performance, price, creative or other advantages over this platform, demandit is common for IZEAx may decreasetalent mangers and our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be negatively affected.

We have experienced rapid growth overlarge publishers to add several connections under a short period andsingle account. Given the challenges inherent in identifying these creators, we do not know whether this willhave a reliable system to accurately identify the number of actual individual creators, and thus we rely on the number of total user connections and user accounts as our measure of the size of our user base. In addition, the number of user accounts includes the total number of individuals that have completed registration through a specific date, less individuals who have unsubscribed, and should not be considered as representative of the number of persons who continue to develop or whether it can be maintained. If we are unableactively create to successfully respond to changes infulfill the market, our business could be harmed.
Our business has grown rapidly as publishers, marketers and creators have increasingly usedsponsorships offered through our platforms. It is difficult to predict whether our platforms will continue to grow and whether the historical levels of growth can be maintained.Many users may create an account but may not actively participate in marketplace activities.

We expect that the platforms will evolve in ways that may be difficult to predict. It is possible that marketers and creators could broadly determine that they no longer believe in the value of our current platforms. In the event of these or any other changes to the market, our continued success will depend on our ability to successfully adjust our strategy to meet the changing market dynamics. If we are unable to do so, our business, prospects, results of operation and financial condition could be materially harmed.

We may fail to meet publicly announced financial guidance or other expectations about our business, which could cause our stock to decline in value.

From time to time, we provide preliminary financial results or forward-looking financial guidance, to our investors, including the guidance provided above under "Management's Discussion and Analysis." Such statements are based on our current views, expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, performance, achievements or share prices to be materially different from any future results, performance, achievements or share prices expressed or implied by such statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others: changes to the assumptions used to forecast or calculate such guidance, the risk that our business does not perform as expected, changes in the markets for our products and services and risks related to competitive factors. Such risks are summarized in the other risks factors included this Risk Factors section.


Delays in releasing enhanced versions of our products and services could adversely affect our competitive position.
 
As part of our strategy, we expect to periodically release enhanced versions of our premier platformsIZEAx and related services. Even if our new versions contain the features and functionality our customers want, in the event we are unable to timely introduce these new product releases, our competitive position may be harmed. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully complete the development of currently planned or future products in a timely and efficient manner. Due to the complexity of
14

these products, internal quality assurance testing and customer testing of pre-commercial releases may reveal product performance issues, undesirable feature enhancements or additional desirable feature enhancements that could lead us to postpone the release of these new versions. In addition, the reallocation of resources associated with any postponement would likely cause delays in the development and release of other future products or enhancements to our currently available products. Any delay in releasing other future products or enhancements of our products could cause our financial results to be adversely impacted.
We may expand our business through acquisitions of other companies, technologies and assets, which may divert our management's attention or prove not to be successful or result in equity dilution.

We have completed two significant recent acquisitions, Ebyline, Inc. in January 2015 and ZenContent, Inc. in July 2016. We may decide to pursue other acquisitions of companies, technologies and assets in the future. Such transactions could divert our management's time and focus from operating our business.

Integrating an acquired company, technology or assets is risky and may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures, including, among other things, with respect to:

incorporating new technologies into our existing business infrastructure;
consolidating corporate and administrative functions;
coordinating our sales and marketing functions to incorporate the new company, technology or assets;
maintaining morale, retaining and integrating key employees to support the new business or technology and managing our expansion in capacity; and
maintaining standards, controls, procedures and policies (including effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures).

In addition, a significant portion of the purchase price of companies we may acquire may be allocated to acquired goodwill and other intangible assets, which must be assessed for impairment at least annually. In the future, if our acquisitions do not yield expected returns, we may be required to take charges to our earnings based on this impairment assessment process, which could harm our operating results.

Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, including our common stock, or the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, amortization expenses or acquired in-process research and development expenses, any of which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Future acquisitions may also require us to obtain additional financing, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. We currently have no commitments or agreements with respect to any such acquisitions, and there can be no assurance that we will complete any acquisitions in the future.

The social sponsorship landscape is subject to numerous changes that could cause our revenue to decline.
Our business model may not continue to be effective in the future for a number of reasons, including the following:

social sponsorship is, by its nature, limited in content relative to other media;
companies may be reluctant or slow to adopt social sponsorship that replaces, limits or competes with their existing direct marketing efforts;
companies may prefer other forms of advertising we do not offer, including certain forms of search engine placements;
companies may not utilize social sponsorship due to concerns of “click-fraud” particularly related to search engine placements (“click-fraud” is a form of online fraud when a person or computer program imitates a legitimate user by clicking on an advertisement for the purpose generating a charge per click without having an actual interest in the target of the advertisement's link); and
regulatory actions may negatively impact certain business practices that we currently rely on to generate a portion of our revenue and profitability.
If the number of companies that purchase social sponsorship from us or the size of the sponsorship campaigns does not grow, our revenue could decline which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.


We rely on third partythird-party social media platforms to provide the mechanism necessary to deliver influencer marketing, and any change in the platform terms, costs, availability, or access to these technologies could adversely affect our business.


We rely on third partythird-party social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube to serve as the mechanism for publishing influencer marketing content to targeted audiences, in order to deliver our sponsored socialinfluencer marketing services to our customers. These platforms include technologies that provide some of the core functionality required to operate the sponsored socialinfluencer marketing portion of our platform, as well as functionalities such as user traffic reporting, ad-serving, content delivery services, discovering services, and reporting.metrics. There can be no assurance that these providers will continue to make all or any of their technologies available to us on reasonable terms, or at all. ProvidersThird-party social media platforms may start charging fees or otherwise change their business models in a manner that impedes our ability to use their technologies. In any event, we have no control over these companies or their decision-making with respect to granting us access to their social media platforms or providing us with analytical data, and any material change in the current terms, costs, availability or use of their social media platforms or analytical data could adversely affect our business.


Our business depends on continued and unimpeded access to the Internet by us and by our customers and their end users. Internet access providers or distributors may be able to block, degrade or charge for access to our content, which could lead to additional expenses to us and our customers and the loss of end users and advertisers.


Products and services such as ours depend on our ability and the ability of our customers' users to access the Internet. Currently, this access is provided by companies that have, or in the future may have, significant market power in the broadband and internetInternet access marketplace, including incumbent telephone companies, cable companies, mobile communications companies and government-owned service providers. Some of these providers may take, or have stated that they may take, measures that could degrade, disrupt, or increase the cost of user access to products or services such as ours by restricting or prohibiting the use of their infrastructure to support or facilitate product or service offerings such as ours, or by charging increased fees to businesses such as ours to provide content or to have users access that content. In 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) released an order, commonly referred to as net neutrality, that, among other things, prohibited (i) the impairment or degradation of lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, application or service and (ii) the practice of favoring some Internet traffic over other Internet traffic based on the payment of higher fees. In December 2017, the FCC voted to overturn the net neutrality regulations imposed by the 2015 order. Internet service providers in the U.S. may now be able to impair or degrade the use of, or increase the cost of using, our products or services. Such interference could result in a loss of existing viewers, subscribers and advertisers, and increased costs, and could impair our ability to attract new viewers, subscribers and advertisers, thereby harming our revenues and growth.


If we fail to retain existing creators, our revenue and business will be harmed.
We must continue to retain and acquire creators that publish sponsorships through IZEAxFluctuations in order to increase revenue from customers and achieve profitability. If creators do not perceive our products and services to be of high value and quality or if we fail to provide value with IZEAx, we may not be able to acquire or retain creators. If we are unable to acquire new creators in numbers sufficient to grow our business, or if creators cease using our products and services, the revenue we generate may decrease and our operating results will be adversely affected. We believe that many of our new creators originate from word of mouth and other referrals from existing creators, and therefore we must ensure that our existing creators remain loyal to our service in order to continue receiving those referrals. If our efforts to satisfy our existing creators are not successful, we may not be able to acquire new creators in sufficient numbers to continue to grow our business or we may be required to incur significantly higher marketing expenses in order to acquire new creators.

Intense competition in our target market could impair our ability to grow and to achieve profitability.
The market for native advertising is highly competitive. We expect this competition to continue to increase, in part because there are no significant barriers to entry to our industry. Increased competition may result in price reductions for advertising space, reduced margins and loss of market share. Our principal competitors include other companies that provide marketers with Internet advertising solutions and companies that offer pay per click search services.
Competition for advertising placements among current and future suppliers of Internet navigational and informational services, high traffic websites and social sponsorship providers, as well as competition with other media for native advertising placements,foreign currency exchange rates could result in significant price competition, declining margins and reductions in advertising revenue. In addition, as we continueunanticipated losses that could adversely affect our efforts to expand the scope of our services, we may compete with a greater number of other media companies across an increasing range of different services, including in vertical markets where competitors may have advantages in expertise, brand recognition and other areas. If existing or future competitors develop or offer products or services that provide significant performance, price, creative or other advantages over those offered by us, our business, prospects, results of operations and financial conditionposition.

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations because a portion of our sales, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in foreign currencies. Changes in the value of foreign currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar, affect our results of operations and financial position. With respect to international sales initially priced using U.S. dollars as a cost basis, a decrease in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar would make our products less price competitive. Once the product is sold at a fixed foreign currency price, we could experience foreign currency gains or losses that could have a material effect on our operating results.

New tax treatment of companies engaged in Internet commerce may adversely affect the commercial use of our services and our financial results.
Due to the global nature of social media and our services, it is possible that various states or foreign countries might attempt to regulate our transmissions or levy sales, income or other taxes relating to our activities. Tax authorities at the international, federal, state and local levels are currently reviewing the appropriate treatment of companies engaged in Internet commerce. New or revised international, federal, state or local tax regulations may subject us or our creators to additional sales, income and other taxes. We cannot predict the effect of current attempts to impose sales, income or other taxes on commerce over social media. New or revised taxes and, in particular, sales taxes, VAT and similar taxes would likely increase the cost of
15

doing business online and decrease the attractiveness of advertising and selling goods and services over social media. New taxes could also create significant increases in internal costs necessary to capture data, and collect and remit taxes. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We may become subject to government regulation and legal uncertainties that could reduce demand for our products and services orincrease the cost of doing business, thereby adversely affecting our financial results.
As described in the section “Business - Government Regulation,” we are subject to laws and regulations applicable to businesses generally and certain laws or regulations directly applicable to service providers for advertising and marketing Internet commerce. Due to the increasing popularity and use of social media, it is possible that a number of laws and regulations may become applicable to us or may be negatively affected. We also competeadopted in the future with traditional advertisingrespect to social media covering issues such as: 
truth-in-advertising;
user privacy;
taxation;
right to access personal information;
copyrights;
distribution; and
characteristics and quality of services.
The applicability of existing laws governing issues such as direct mail, television, radio, cableproperty ownership, copyrights and print for a shareother intellectual property, encryption, taxation, libel and export or import matters to social media platforms is uncertain. The vast majority of marketers' total advertising budgets. Many currentthese laws were adopted prior to the broad commercial use of social media platforms and potential competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, such as longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases, greater access to advertising space on high-traffic websites, and significantly greater financial, technical, sales and marketing resources.related technologies. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the unique issues of social media and related technologies. Changes to these laws intended to address these issues, including some recently proposed changes, could create uncertainty in the social media marketplace. Such uncertainty could reduce demand for our services or increase the cost of doing business due to increased costs of litigation or increased service delivery costs.
Our influencer marketing business is subject to the risks associated with word of mouth advertising and endorsements, suchas violations of “truth-in-advertising” laws, the FTC Endorsement Guide and other similar global regulatory requirements and, more generally, loss of consumer confidence.

As the practice of targeted advertising is increasingly scrutinized by both regulators and the industry alike, a greater emphasis has been placed on educating consumers about their privacy choices on the Internet, and providing them with the right to opt in or opt out of targeted advertising. The common thread throughout both targeted advertising and the FTC requirements described in detail in the section “Business - Government Regulation” is the increased importance placed on transparency between the marketer and the consumer to ensure that consumers know the difference between “information” and “advertising” on the Internet, and are afforded the opportunity to decide how their personal information will be used in the manner to which they are marketed. There is a risk regarding negative consumer perception of the practice of “undisclosed compensation” of social media users to endorse specific products. As described in the section “Business - Government Regulation,” we may be unableundertake various measures through controls across our platforms and by monitoring and enforcing our code of ethics to compete successfully. If we failensure that marketers and creators comply with the FTC's Endorsement Guide (and analogous laws and guidance in other countries) when utilizing our websites, but if competitors and other companies do not, it could create a negative overall perception for the industry. Not only will readers stop relying on blogs for useful, timely and insightful information that enrich their lives by having access to compete successfully, weup-to-the-minute information that often bears different perspectives and philosophies, but a lack of compliance will almost inevitably result in greater governmental oversight and involvement in an already-highly regulated marketplace. A pervasive overall negative perception caused by a failure of our own preventative measures or by others not complying with the FTC's Endorsement Guide (among the FTC's other acts, regulations and policies, and among analogous laws and guidance in other countries,) could lose customers or advertising inventory and ourresult in reduced revenue and results of operations and higher compliance costs for us.
16

Failure to comply with federal, state and international privacy laws and regulations, or the expansion of current or the enactment of new privacy laws or regulations, could decline.adversely affect our business.
A variety of federal, state and international laws and regulations govern the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of personal information (“Privacy Laws”). Privacy Laws are evolving and subject to potentially differing interpretations. The European Union adopted the GDPR, which went into effect in May 2018, and requires companies to satisfy stricter requirements regarding the handling of personal and sensitive data, including its collection, use, protection and the ability of persons whose data is stored to correct or delete such data about themselves. EU Member States also are enacting national GDPR-implementing laws that are in some cases stricter or different from GDPR. During 2018, Brazil enacted a law similar to GDPR and other countries are expanding or considering their Privacy Laws to follow suit. Complying with these new and expanded Privacy Laws will cause us to incur substantial operational costs or may require us to change our business practices. For example, noncompliance with the GDPR could result in proceedings against us by governmental entities or others and fines up to the greater of €20 million or 4% of annual global revenues as well as damage to our reputation and brand. We also may find it necessary to establish systems to effectuate cross-border personal data transfers of personal information originating from the European Economic Area, Australia, Japan and other non-U.S. jurisdictions, which may involve substantial expense and distraction from other aspects of our business.

We have made public certain statements about our privacy practices concerning the collection, use and disclosure of creators' personal information on our websites and platforms. Several Internet companies have incurred penalties for failing to abide by the representations made in their public-facing privacy notices. In addition, several states have adopted legislation that requires businesses to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect sensitive personal information and to provide notice to consumers in the event of a security breach. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with our public-facing privacy notices, FTC requirements or orders or other federal, state or international privacy or consumer protection-related laws, regulations or industry self-regulatory principles could result in claims, proceedings or actions against us by governmental or other entities or the incurring by us of other liabilities, which could adversely affect our business. In addition, a failure or perceived failure to comply with industry standards or with our own privacy policies and practices could result in a loss of creators or marketers and adversely affect our business. Federal, state, and international governmental authorities continue to evaluate the privacy implications of targeted advertising, such as the use of cookies and other tracking technology. The regulation of these cookies and other current online advertising practices could adversely affect our business.
 
Our business depends on a strong brand, and if we are not able to maintain and enhance our brand, or if we receive unfavorable media coverage, our ability to expand our base of creators and marketers will be impaired and our business and operating results will be harmed.
 
We believe that the brand identity that we have developed has significantly contributed to the success of our business. We also believe that maintaining and enhancing the "IZEA"“IZEA” brand is critical to expanding our base of creators and marketers. Maintaining and enhancing our brand may require us to make substantial investments and these investments may not be successful. If we fail to promote, maintain, and maintainprotect the "IZEA"“IZEA” brand, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected. We anticipate that, as our market becomes increasingly competitive, maintaining and enhancing our brand may become increasingly difficult and expensive. Unfavorable publicity or consumer perception of our platforms, applications, practices or service offerings, or the offerings of our marketers, could adversely affect our reputation, resulting in difficulties in recruiting, decreased revenue and a negative impact on the number of marketers and the size of our creator base, the loyalty of our creators and the number and variety of sponsorships we offer each day. As a result, our business, prospects, results of operation, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Our total number of user accounts may be higher than the number of our actual individual marketers or creators and may not be representative of the number of persons who are active users.

Our total number of user accounts in IZEAx and Ebyline may be higher than the number of our actual individual marketers and creators because some may have created multiple accounts for different purposes, including different user connections. We define a user connection as a social account or blog that has been added to IZEAx under a user account. It is possible for one user to add as many user connections as they like, and it is common for talent mangers and large publishers to add many connections under a single account. Given the challenges inherent in identifying these creators, we do not have a reliable system to accurately identify the number of actual individual creators, and thus we rely on the number of total user connections and user accounts as our measure of the size of our user base. In addition, the number of user accounts includes the total number of individuals that have completed registration through a specific date, less individuals who have unsubscribed, and should not be considered as representative of the number of persons who continue to actively create to fulfill the sponsorships offered through our platforms. Many users may create an account, but do not actively participate in marketplace activities.
We may become subject to government regulation and legal uncertainties that could reduce demand for our products and services orincrease the cost of doing business, thereby adversely affecting our financial results.
As described in the section "Business - Government Regulation," we are subject to laws and regulations applicable to businesses generally and certain laws or regulations directly applicable to service providers for advertising and marketing

Internet commerce. Due to the increasing popularity and use of the social media, it is possible that a number of laws and regulations may become applicable to us or may be adopted in the future with respect to the Internet covering issues such as:
truth-in-advertising;
user privacy;
taxation;
right to access personal data;
copyrights;
distribution; and
characteristics and quality of services.
The applicability of existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights and other intellectual property, encryption, taxation, libel, export or import matters and personal privacy to social media platforms is uncertain. The vast majority of these laws were adopted prior to the broad commercial use of social media platforms and related technologies. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the unique issues of social media and related technologies. Changes to these laws intended to address these issues, including some recently proposed changes, could create uncertainty in the social media marketplace. Such uncertainty could reduce demand for our services or increase the cost of doing business due to increased costs of litigation or increased service delivery costs.
Our social sponsorship business is subject to the risks associated with word of mouth advertising and endorsements, suchas violations of the “truth-in-advertising,” FTC Guides and other similar regulatory requirements and, more generally, loss of consumer confidence.
We do not engage in targeted or online behavioral advertising practices, nor do we compile or use information concerning consumer behavior on an individual level, but we may do so from time to time in the aggregate and on an anonymous basis to analyze our services and offerings, and better optimize them for improved business results.  As the practice of targeted advertising has become increasingly scrutinized by both regulators and the industry alike, a greater emphasis has been placed on educating consumers about their privacy choices on the Internet, and providing them with the right to opt in or opt out of certain industry practices, such as targeted advertising. The common thread throughout both targeted advertising and the FTC requirements described in detail in the section "Business - Government Regulation" is the increased importance placed on transparency between the marketer and the consumer to ensure that consumers know the difference between “information” and “advertising” on the Internet, and are afforded the opportunity to decide how their data will be used in the manner to which they are marketed. There is a risk regarding negative consumer perception “of the practice of undisclosed compensation of social media users to endorse specific products” which pertains to a risk of overall general public confidence in the FTC's ability to enforce its Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising in social media.  As described in the section "Business - Government Regulation," we undertake various measures through controls across our platforms and by monitoring and enforcing our code of ethics to ensure that marketers and creators comply with the FTC Guides when utilizing our sites, but if competitors and other companies do not, it could create a negative overall perception for the industry. Not only will readers stop relying on blogs for useful, timely and insightful information that enrich their lives by having access to up-to-the-minute information that often bears different perspectives and philosophies, but a lack of compliance will almost inevitably result in greater governmental oversight and involvement in an already-highly regulated marketplace.  If there is pervasive overall negative perception caused by others not complying with FTC Guides among its other acts, regulations and policies, then this could result in reduced revenue and results of operations and higher compliance costs for us.
New tax treatment of companies engaged in internet commerce may adversely affect the commercial use of our services and our financial results.
Due to the global nature of social media, it is possible that various states or foreign countries might attempt to regulate our transmissions or levy sales, income or other taxes relating to our activities. Tax authorities at the international, federal, state and local levels are currently reviewing the appropriate treatment of companies engaged in internet commerce. New or revised international, federal, state or local tax regulations may subject us or our creators to additional sales, income and other taxes. We cannot predict the effect of current attempts to impose sales, income or other taxes on commerce over social media. New or revised taxes and, in particular, sales taxes, VAT and similar taxes would likely increase the cost of doing business online and decrease the attractiveness of advertising and selling goods and services over social media. New taxes could also create significant increases in internal costs necessary to capture data, and collect and remit taxes. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Failure to comply with federal, state and international privacy laws and regulations, or the expansion of current or the enactment of new privacy laws or regulations, could adversely affect our business.
A variety of federal, state and international laws and regulations govern the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of consumer data. The existing privacy-related laws and regulations are evolving and subject to potentially differing interpretations. In addition, various federal, state and foreign legislative and regulatory bodies may expand current or enact new laws regarding privacy matters. For example, recently there have been Congressional hearings and increased attention to the capture and use of location-based information relating to users of smartphones and other mobile devices. We have posted privacy policies and practices concerning the collection, use and disclosure of creator data on our websites and platforms. Several internet companies have incurred penalties for failing to abide by the representations made in their privacy policies and practices. In addition, several states have adopted legislation that requires businesses to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect sensitive personal information and to provide notice to consumers in the event of a security breach. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with our posted privacy policies or with any data-related consent orders, FTC requirements or orders or other federal, state or international privacy or consumer protection-related laws, regulations or industry self-regulatory principles could result in claims, proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others or other liabilities, which could adversely affect our business. In addition, a failure or perceived failure to comply with industry standards or with our own privacy policies and practices could result in a loss of creators or marketers and adversely affect our business. Federal, state and international governmental authorities continue to evaluate the privacy implications inherent in the use of third-party web "cookies" for behavioral advertising. The regulation of these cookies and other current online advertising practices could adversely affect our business.

Our business depends on our ability to maintain and scale the network infrastructure necessary to operate our platforms and applications, and any significant disruption in service on our platforms and applications could result in a loss of creators or marketers.
 
Creators and marketers access our services through our platforms and applications. Our reputation and ability to acquire, retain, and serve our creators and marketers are dependent upon the reliable performance of our platforms and applications and the underlying network infrastructure. AsIf our creator base continues to grow, we will need an increasing amount of network capacity and computing power. We have spent and expect to continue to spend substantial amounts for data centers and equipment and related network infrastructure to handle the traffic on our platforms and applications. The operation of these systems is expensive and complex and could result in operational failures. In the event that our creator base or the amount of traffic on our platforms and applications grows more quickly than anticipated, we may be required to incur significant additional costs. Interruptions in these systems, whether due to system failures, computer viruses or physical or
17

electronic break-ins, could affect the security or availability of our platforms and applications, and prevent our creators and marketers from accessing our services. A substantial portion of our network infrastructure is hosted by third-party providers. Any disruption in these services or any failure of these providers to handle existing or increased traffic could significantly harm our business. Any financial or other difficulties these providers face may adversely affect our business, and we exercise little control over these providers, which increases our vulnerability to problems with the services they provide. If we do not maintain or expand our network infrastructure successfully or if we experience operational failures, we could lose current and potential creators and marketers or transactions between the two groups, which could harm our operating results and financial condition.
 
If our security measures are breached, or if our services are subject to attacks that degrade or deny the ability of users to access our platforms, our platforms and applications may be perceived as not being secure, marketers and creators may curtail or stop using our services, and we may incur significant legal and financial exposure.

Our platforms and applications and the network infrastructure that is hosted by third-party providers involve the storage and transmission of marketer and creator proprietary information, and security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss of this information, litigation and potential liability. Our security measures may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, malfeasance, security flaws in the third partythird-party hosting service that we rely upon or any number of other reasons and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our data or our marketers' or creators' data. Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, marketers or creators to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or our marketers' or creators' data. Although we do have security measures in place, we have had instances where some customers have used fraudulent credit cards in order to pay for our services. While these breaches of our security did not result in material harm to our business, any future breach or unauthorized access could result in significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation and a loss of confidence in the security of our platforms and applications that could potentially have an adverse effect on our business. Because the techniques used to obtain and use unauthorized credit cards, obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures on a timely basis. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, the market perception of the

effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose marketers, creators, and vendors and have difficulty obtaining merchant processors or insurance coverage essential for our operations.
 
If our technology platforms contain defects, we may need to suspend their availability and our business and reputation would beharmed.
 
Platforms as complex as ours often contain unknown and undetected errorsdefects or performance problems. Many serious defects are frequently found during the period immediately following introduction and initial release of new platforms or enhancements to existing platforms. Although we attempt to resolve all errorsdefects that we believe would be considered serious by our customers before making our platforms available to them, our products are not error-free. These errors or performance problems could result in lost revenues or delays in customer acceptance that would be detrimental to our business and reputation.defect-free. We may not be able to detect and correct errorsdefects before releasing our product commercially. We cannot assure youensure that undetected errorsdefects or performance problems in our existing or future products will not be discovered in the future or that known errors,defects, considered minor by us, will not result in serious issues for our customers. Any such defects or performance problems may be considered serious by our customers, resulting in a decrease in our revenues.

We may be subject to lawsuits for information by our marketers and our creators, which may affect our business.
 
Laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their marketers or of their social media creators and for the content of their marketers' listings are currently unsettled. It is unclear whether we could be subjected to claims for defamation, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement or claims based on other theories relating to the information we publish on our websites or the information that is published across our platforms. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against online services as well asand print publications in the past. We may not successfully avoid civil or criminal liability for unlawful activities carried out by our marketers or our creators. Our potential liability for unlawful activities of our marketers or our creators or for the content of our marketers' listings could require us to implement measures to reduce our exposure to such liability, which may require us, among other things, to spend substantial resources or to discontinue certain service offerings. Our insurance may not adequately protect us against these types of claims and the defense of such claims may divert the attention of our management from our operations. If we are subjected to such lawsuits, it may adversely affect our business.
 
If we fail to detect click-fraud or other invalid clicks, we could lose the confidence of our marketers and advertising partners as a result of lost revenue to marketers or misappropriation of proprietary and confidential information, thereby causing ourbusiness to suffer.
18

 
“Click-fraud” is a form of online fraud when a person or computer program imitates a legitimate user by intentionally clicking on an advertisement for the purpose of generating a charge per click without having an actual interest in the target of the advertisement's link. We are exposed to the risk of fraudulent or illegitimate clicks on our sponsored listings. The security measures we have in place, which are designed to reduce the likelihood of click-fraud, detect click-fraud from time to time. WhileAlthough the instances of click-fraud that we have detected to date have not had a material effect on our business, click-fraud could result in ana marketer experiencing a reduced return on their investment in our advertising programs because the fraudulent clicks will not lead to revenue for the marketers. As a result, our marketers and advertising partners may become dissatisfied with our advertising programs, which could lead to loss of marketers, advertising partners, and revenue. In addition, anyone who is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary and confidential information or could cause interruptions in our operations. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against such security breaches or to address problems caused by such breaches. Concerns over the security of the Internet and other online transactions and the privacy of users may also deter people from using the Internet to conduct transactions that involve transmitting confidential information.

If third parties claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights, it may result in costly litigation.
We cannot assure you that third parties will not claim our current or future products or services infringe their intellectual property rights. Any such claims, with or without merit, could cause costly litigation that could consume significant management time. As the number of productThe influencer and services offerings in our market increases and functionalities increasingly overlap, companies such as ours may become increasingly subject to infringement claims. These claims also might require us to enter into royalty or license agreements. If required, we may not be able to obtain such royalty or license agreements, or obtain them on terms acceptable to us.
Historically, we have not relied upon patents to protect our proprietary technology, and our competitors may be able to offer similar products andservices which would harm our competitive position.

Our success depends upon our proprietary technology. We do not have registered patents on any of our current platforms, because we determined that the costs of patent prosecution outweighed the benefits given the alternative of reliance upon copyright law to protect our computer code and other proprietary technology and properties. In addition to copyright laws, we rely upon service mark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to establish and protect our proprietary rights. As part of our confidentiality procedures, we enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees and consultants. Despite these precautions, third parties could copy or otherwise obtain and use our technology without authorization, or develop similar technology independently. In addition, effective protection of intellectual property rights is unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries. We cannot assure you that the protection of our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products and services or design around any intellectual property rights we hold.

Our marketcontent marketing industry is subject to rapid technological change and, to compete, we must continually enhance our products and services.
 
We must continue to enhance and improve the performance, functionality, and reliability of our products and services. The social sponsorshipinfluencer and content marketing industry is characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user requirements and preferences, frequent new product and service introductions embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and practices that could render our products and services obsolete. In the past, we have discovered that some of our customers desire additional performance and functionality not currently offered by our products. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to develop new products and services that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our customers, and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis. The development of our technology and other proprietary technology involves significant technical and business risks. We may fail to use new technologies effectively or to adapt our proprietary technology and systems to customer requirements or emerging industry standards. If we are unable to adapt to changing market conditions, customer requirements or emerging industry standards, we may not be able to increase our revenue and expand our business.
 
Difficulties we may encounter managing our growth could adversely affect our results of operations.
We have increased our full-time employees from 92 to 137 and our revenues from $8,322,274 to $27,310,602 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to December 31, 2016, respectively. This growth has placed, and our continued growth will continue to place, a strain on our managerial and financial resources. As our business needs expand, we intend to hire new employees. To manage the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we will be required to:
improve existing, and implement new, operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures;
install enhanced management information systems; and
train, motivate and manage our employees.
We may not be able to install adequate management information and control systems in an efficient and timely manner, and our current or planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. If we are unable to manage growth effectively, our business would be seriously harmed.
If we lose key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional qualified personnel we may not be able to successfully manageour business and achieve our objectives.


We believe our future success will depend upon our ability to retain our key management, including Edward H. Murphy, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ryan S. Schram, our President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Murphy, who is our founder, has unique knowledge regarding the social sponsorshipinfluencer marketing space, and business contacts, and system design and development expertise regarding our platforms that would be difficult to replace. Mr. Schram has sales, marketing, and business development expertise regarding our platforms that our other officers do not possess. Even though we have employment agreements in place with each of them, if Messrs. Murphy and Schram were to become unavailable to us, our operations would be adversely affected. Although we maintain "key-man"“key-man” life insurance for our benefit on the lives of Mr. Murphy and Mr. Schram, this insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for the loss of our executive officers.


Our future success and our ability to expand our operations will also depend in large part on our ability to attract and retain additional qualified engineers, sales and marketing and senior management personnel. Competition for these types of employees is intense due to the limited number of qualified professionals and the high demand for them, particularly in the Orlando, Florida area where our headquarters are located. We have in the past experienced difficulty in recruiting qualified personnel. Failure to attract, assimilate and retain personnel, including key management, technical, sales and marketing personnel, would have a material adverse effect on our business and potential growth.

 
Public company compliance may make it more difficult to attract and retain officers and directors.
 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. As a public company, we expect these rules and regulations to increase our compliance costs and to make certain activities more time consuming and costly. As a public company, we also expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult and costly for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors or as executive officers.


19

Risks Relating to our Common Stock


ExerciseOur common stock may be delisted if we fail to maintain compliance with the requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, and the price of our common stock and our ability to access the capital markets could be negatively impacted.

Our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”). To maintain this listing, we must satisfy Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, including, among other things, a minimum closing bid price requirement of $1.00 per share for continued inclusion on the Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1) (the "Bid Price Rule").

On November 12, 2020, we received a notification letter from Nasdaq informing us that for the prior 30 consecutive business days, the bid price of our common stock had closed below $1.00 per share. This notice had no immediate effect on our Nasdaq listing, and we had 180 calendar days, or until May 11, 2021, to regain compliance.

On January 6, 2021, we received notification from Nasdaq that we had regained compliance with the Bid Price Rule after the closing bid price of our common stock was at $1.00 per share or greater for the prior 10 consecutive business days.     

Although we are now in compliance with the Bid Price Rule, if we fail to meet this or any of the other continued listing requirements in the future, our common stock may be delisted from Nasdaq, which could reduce the liquidity of our common stock materially and result in a corresponding material reduction in the price of our common stock. In addition, delisting could harm our ability to raise capital through alternative financing sources on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and may result in the potential loss of confidence by investors, employees, and business development opportunities. Such a delisting likely would impair your ability to sell or purchase our common stock when you wish to do so. Further, if we were to be delisted from Nasdaq, our common stock may no longer be recognized as a “covered security” and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities. Thus, delisting from Nasdaq could adversely affect our ability to raise additional financing through the public or private sale of equity securities, would significantly impact the ability of investors to trade our securities and would negatively impact the value and liquidity of our common stock.

We have raised, and may raise, additional capital to meet our business requirements in the future and such capital raising may be costly or difficult to obtain and could dilute current stockholders’ ownership interests.

We have incurred losses since inception and expect to continue to incur losses until we are able to significantly grow our revenues. From 2019 to 2020, we incurred a year-over-year decrease in revenue. If our annual revenue does not increase, we may need additional financing to maintain and expand our business. This financing may be obtained through our at-the-market (ATM) equity offering program under the sales agreement, dated January 25, 2021, with National Securities Corporation acting as sales agent, pursuant to which we may sell common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $35,000,000. Any additional capital raised through our at-the-market equity offering program or any other financing involving the sale of equity or equity linked securities may dilute current stockholders’ ownership percentages and could also result in a decrease in the market value of our equity securities.

The terms of any securities issued by us in future capital transactions may be more favorable to new investors, and may include preferences, superior voting rights and the issuance of warrants or other derivative securities, which may have a further dilutive effect on the holders of any of our securities then outstanding. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, securities law compliance fees, printing and distribution expenses, and other costs. We may be required to bear the costs even if we are unable to successfully complete any such capital financing. We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we issue, such as convertible promissory notes and warrants, which may adversely impact our financial results.

Exercises of stock options, warrants, and other securities will dilute your percentage of ownership and could cause our stock price to fall.
 
As of March 24, 2017,26, 2021, we had 5,670,90459,129,390 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, which included 37,620 shares of unvested restricted stock, outstanding stock options to purchase 962,4331,742,303 shares of our common stock at an average exercise price of $8.03$2.55 per share, and outstanding warrants to purchase 557,421unvested restricted stock units of 569,934 shares with an intrinsic value of our common stock at an average exercise price$2,308,233.

As of $8.59 per share.

WeMarch 26, 2021, we also have reserved shares to issue stock options, restricted stock or other awards to purchase or receive up to 18,3773,651,597 shares of common stock under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, 4,375 shares of common stock under our August 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, and 49,762395,613 shares of common stock under our 2014 Employee Stock Purchase
20

Plan. In the future, we may grant additional stock options, restricted stock units, warrants and convertible securities, as well as issuethese additional shares or issue new securities, in accordance with terms defined in employment agreements or as part of common stock pursuant to the earn-out provisions of the stock purchase agreements in connection with our Ebyline and ZenContent acquisitions.additional incentive programs. The exercise, conversion or exchange by holders of stock options, restricted stock units, warrants or convertible securitieswarrants for shares of common stock, andor the issuance of new shares pursuant to acquisition earn-out provisions,of common stock for additional compensation will dilute the percentage ownership of our other stockholders. SalesIssuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could cause the price of our common stock to fall and could impair our ability to raise capital by selling additional securities.

There may be substantial sales of our common stock under our effective shelf registration.

We have an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-212247) for the sale of up to $75,000,000 of our common stock. Currently, under Form S-3 rules, we can only sell our securities in a public primary offering with a value not exceeding one-third of our public float in any 12-month period, because our public float is below $75,000,000. Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock or securities convertible or exercisable into shares of our common stock under the shelf registration statement could cause the market price of our common stock to drop and could dilute your percentage of ownership.

There may be substantial sales of our common stock under the prospectus relating to our 2013 and 2014 private placements, which could cause our stock price to drop.

We have effective registration statements (File No. 333-191743 and File No. 333-197482) covering the resale of 587,202shares of our common stock that may be offered by certain stockholders who participated in our 2013 private placement and loan consideration from August through September 2013 or who obtained shares of common stock for services. The number of shares the selling stockholders may sell consists of 487,226 shares of common stock that are currently issued and outstanding and 99,976 shares of common stock that they may receive if they exercise their warrants.

We also have an effective registration statement (File No. 333-195081) covering the resale of 1,469,147 shares of our common stock that may be offered by certain stockholders who participated in our 2014 private placement. The number of shares the selling stockholders may sell consists of 1,147,663 shares of common stock that are currently issued and outstanding and 321,484 shares of common stock that they may receive if they exercise their warrants.
There are currently no agreements or understandings in place with these selling stockholders to restrict their sale of those shares.  Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock by the selling stockholders over a short period of time could cause the market price of our common stock to drop and could impair our ability to raise capital in the future by selling additional securities.



Issuance of stock to pay future obligations will dilute your percentage of ownership and could cause our stock price to fall.

On July 31, 2016, we purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of ZenContent, Inc. pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement among our company, ZenContent and the stockholders of ZenContent for a maximum purchase price to be paid over the next three years of $4,500,000. Upon closing we made a cash payment of $400,000 and issued 86,207 shares of our common stock valued at $600,000 (using the 30 trading-day volume-weighted average closing price of our common stock of $6.96 per share as of July 29, 2016). The agreement also requires (i) three equal annual installment payments totaling $1,000,000 commencing 12 months following the closing and (ii) contingent performance payments of up to an aggregate of $2,500,000 over the three 12-month periods following the closing, based upon ZenContent achieving certain minimum revenue thresholds. Of these payments, 33% of each such annual installment or contingent performance payment will be in the form of cash and the remainder of such payment will be in the form of either cash or additional shares of our common stock, determined at our option. If we issue stock as payment for up to 67% of the future amounts owed, there is no stated maximum on the number of shares that we may issue. This may result in the issuance of substantial amount of shares because the number of shares will be determined using the 30 trading-day volume-weighted average closing price of our common stock prior to the payment. The issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock to the former stockholders of ZenContent or our other stockholders or the perception that such sales may occur could cause our stock price to decline, make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of our common stock or acquire other businesses using our common stock as consideration.


If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about us, our business, or our market, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts may publish about us, our business, our market, or our competitors. No person is under any obligation to publish research or reports on us, and any person publishing research or reports on us may discontinue doing so at any time without notice. If adequate research coverage is not maintained on our company or if any of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or provide relatively more favorable recommendations about our competitors, our stock price would likely decline. If any analysts who cover us were to cease coverage of our companyCompany or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.


Our earnings are subject to substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and to market downturns.
 
Our revenues and earnings may fluctuate significantly in the future. General economic or other political conditions may cause a downturn in the market for our products or services. A future downturn in the market for our products or services could adversely affect our operating results and increase the risk of substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations in our earnings. Our future operating results may be affected by many factors, including, but not limited to: our ability to retain existing or secure anticipated marketers and creators; our ability to develop, introduce and market new products and services on a timely basis; changes in the mix of products developed, produced and sold; and disputes with our marketers and creators.creators; and general economic conditions causing a reduction in spending by our customers. These factors affecting our future earnings are difficult to forecast and could harm our quarterly and/or annual operating results. The change in our earnings or general economic conditions may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate.
 
Our stockThe price may be volatile.

Whileof our shares of common stock in the public markets has experienced, and may in the future experience, extreme volatility due to a variety of factors, many of which are listed forbeyond our control.

Since our common stock started trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, it has been relatively thinly traded and at times been subject to price volatility. Recently our common stock has experienced extreme price and volume volatility. From January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, the closing price of our common stock ranged from a low of $0.13 on March 18, 2020 to a high of $2.82 on June 11, 2020, with an average daily trading volume of 6.7 million shares. On January 25, 2021, the price increased to an intraday high of $7.45 per share and 25,323,000 shares were traded. Otherwise, in January 2021 the closing price of our common stock averaged $3.65 with an average daily trading volume of 8.9 million shares and, in February 2021, the closing price of our common stock averaged $4.70 with an average daily trading volume of 4.0 million shares.

In addition to shares of our common stock, the stock market in general, and the stock prices of technology-based companies in particular, have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of any specific public company. The market price of our common stock has historically experienced and may continue to experience significant volatility. As a result, the market price could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

changes in our industry;
competitive pricing pressures;
our ability to obtain working capital financing;
additions or departures of key personnel;
limited "public float"“public float” in the hands of a small number of persons whose sales or lack of sales could result in positive or negative pricing pressure on the market prices of our common stock;
speculative trading practices of certain market participants;
actual or purported “short squeeze” trading activity;
21

expiration of any Rule 144 holding periods or registration of unregistered securities issued by us;
sales of our common stock;

our ability to execute our business plan;
operating results that fall below expectations;
loss of any strategic relationship;
regulatory developments; and
economic and other external factors.factors, including effects of the coronavirus pandemic.
 
These and other market and industry factors may cause the market price and demand for our common stock to fluctuate substantially, regardless of our actual operating performance, which may limit or prevent investors from readily selling their shares of common stock and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock.


We haveFurther, on some occasions, our stock price may be, or may be purported to be, subject to “short squeeze” activity. A “short squeeze” is a technical market condition that occurs when the price of a stock increases substantially, forcing market participants who had taken a position that its price would fall (i.e. who had sold the stock “short”), to buy it, which in turn may create significant, short-term demand for the stock not paid dividendsfor fundamental reasons, but rather due to the need for such market participants to acquire the stock in order to forestall the risk of even greater losses. A “short squeeze” condition in the market for a stock can lead to short-term conditions involving very high volatility and trading that may or may not track fundamental valuation models.

In addition, in the past, and do not expect to pay dividendsclass action litigation has often been instituted against companies whose securities have experienced periods of volatility in market price. Securities litigation brought against us following volatility in our stock price, regardless of the future.  Any return on investment may be limited tothe valuemerit or ultimate results of our common stock.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate doing sosuch litigation, could result in the foreseeable future.  The payment of dividends onsubstantial costs, which would hurt our common stock will depend on earnings, financial condition and other businessoperating results and economic factors affecting us at such time asdivert management’s attention and resources from our Board of Directors may consider relevant.  If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates.business.




ITEM 1B - UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


None.




ITEM 2 - PROPERTIES


Our corporate headquarters are locatedbased near Orlando using an address at 480501 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 200313 PMB 247 in Winter Park, Florida. We occupydo not have any current physical locations and all of our offices pursuantemployees are working remotely. When we determine it prudent to end or modify our work-from-home policy, we will consider entering into a five-year, five-month sublease agreement that expires in April 2019 and is renewablenew lease for one additional year until April 2020. We lease approximately 15,500 square feet based on an annually increasing rate of $17.50 to $22.50 per square foot annual rate over the lease term. We also lease flexible office space under one-year renewable contracts in Los Angeles, Chicago and Toronto.
Total rent expense recorded in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations was approximately $618,940 and $491,543and/or arrangements for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.use of co-working facilities.




ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


From time to time, we may become involved in various other lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Litigation is, however, subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. WeAs of March 26, 2021, we are currently not aware of any legal proceedings or claims that we believe would or could have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on us. Regardless of final outcomes, however, any such proceedings or claims may nonetheless impose a significant burden on management and employees and may come with costly defense costs or unfavorable preliminary interim rulings.



ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


Not applicableapplicable.





22

PART II



ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Common Stock Information


On January 26, 2016, ourOur shares of common stock commenced tradingtrade on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol IZEA. Prior thereto, our common stock was quoted on the OTCQB marketplace under the same symbol. On January 6, 2016, we filed a Certificate of Change with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effect a reverse stock split of our outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of one share for every 20 shares outstanding prior to the effective date of the reverse stock split. All historical prices in the following table reflect the 1-for-20 reverse stock split of our outstanding shares of common stock that became market effective on January 11, 2016.

The following table sets forth the range of the high and low closing prices reported for our common stock during the periods presented below. The quotations represent inter-dealer prices without retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. The quotations may be rounded for presentation.
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 High Low
First quarter $8.00
 $4.60
Second quarter $10.00
 $7.20
Third quarter $8.80
 $6.80
Fourth quarter $9.70
 $6.81

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 High Low
First quarter $8.40
 $6.38
Second quarter $7.85
 $5.75
Third quarter $7.79
 $5.60
Fourth quarter $5.75
 $4.38

Holders

As of March 24, 2017,26, 2021, we had approximately 298173 shareholders of record of our common stock. This number does not include beneficial owners whose shares are held in the names of various securities brokers, dealers and registered clearing agencies.


Dividend Policy


We have never declared or paid cash dividends onto holders of our common stock and we do not intend to payanticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Rather,future as we expectintend to retain any earnings for use in our business. Any future earnings (if any)determination to fundpay dividends will be at the operation and expansiondiscretion of our businessboard of directors and for general corporate purposes.will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our board of directors deems relevant.


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans


See the section "Equity Compensation Plan Information,"“Equity Incentive Plans,” under Part III, Item 11 in Part III of this Form 10-K.Annual Report.


Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities


Except as previously reported in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the year ended December 31, 2016,SEC, there were no unregistered sales of equity securities by us during the year ended December 31, 2016.2020.     

Share Repurchase Program

On January 30, 2017, we issued 200,542July 1, 2019, the Board authorized and approved a share repurchase program under which the Company could repurchase up to $3,500,000 of its common stock from time to time through December 31, 2020, subject to market conditions. The Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock valued at $938,532 to the former Ebyline stockholders as settlement of our annual installment payment owed under the January 2015 Stock Purchase Agreement.share repurchase program prior to its expiration on December 31, 2020.




On February 12, 2017, we issued 7,109 shares valued at $30,000 as compensation for services a contractor provided to us.

The foregoing issuances of shares were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Equity Repurchases

None.

ITEM 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.



23

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships among any amounts in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of trends in operating results for any future period. This report contains “forward-looking statements.” The statements, which are not historical facts contained in this report, including this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and notes to our consolidated financial statements, particularly those that utilize terminology such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “should,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” “intends,” or “plans” or comparable terminology are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Future events and our actual results may differ materially from the results reflected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, our ability to raise additional funding, customer cancellations, our ability to maintain and grow our business, variability of operating results, our ability to maintain and enhance our brand, our development and introduction of new products and services, the successful integration of acquired companies, technologies and assets into our portfolio of software and services, marketing and other business development initiatives, competition in the industry, general government regulation, economic conditions, dependence on key personnel, the ability to attract, hire and retain personnel who possess the technical skills and experience necessary to meet the service requirements of our customers, our ability to protect our intellectual property, the potential liability with respect to actions taken by our existing and past employees, risks associated with international sales, and other risks described herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

All forward-looking statements in this document are based on our current expectations, intentions and beliefs using information currently available to us as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.  Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Company Overview


IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (“IZEA”, “we”, “us” or “our”) creates and operates online marketplaces that connectsconnect marketers, including brands, agencies, and publishers, with influential content creators.creators such as bloggers and tweeters (“creators”). Our technology brings the marketers and creators rangetogether, enabling their transactions to be completed at scale through the management of custom content workflow, creator search and targeting, bidding, analytics, and payment processing.

We help power the creator economy, allowing everyone from leading social media influencerscollege students and stay-at-home individuals to celebrities and accredited journalists.journalists the opportunity to monetize their content, creativity and influence through our marketers. These creators are compensated by IZEA for producing and distributing unique content such as long-formlong and short form text, videos, photos, and status updates, and illustrations for marketers or distributing such content on behalf of marketers through their personal websites, blogs, and social media channels.

Marketers engage us to gain access to our industry expertise, technology, data, analytics, and network of creators. The majority of the marketers engage us to perform these services on their behalf, but they also have the ability to use our marketplaces on a self-service basis by licensing our technology. Our technology is used for two primary purposes: the engagement of creators for influencer marketing campaigns, or the engagement of creators to create stand-alone custom content for the marketers’ own use and distribution. Marketers receive influential consumer content and engaging, shareable stories that drive awareness.


We help power the creator economy, allowing everyone from college students and stay at home moms to celebrities the opportunity to monetize their content, creativity and influence. Marketers benefit from buzz, traffic, awareness and sales, and creators earn cash compensation in exchange for their work and promotion.

Our online marketplaces are powered by theprimary technology platform, The IZEA Exchange (“(“IZEAx”). Our technology, enables transactions to be completed at scale through the management of custom content workflow, creator search and targeting, bidding, analytics, and payment processing. IZEAx is designed to provide a unified ecosystem that enables the creation and publication of multiple types of custom content including blog posts, status updates, videos and photos through a wide variety ofcreator’s personal websites, blogs, or social media channels including blogs, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and Tumblr,YouTube, among others.

We derive revenue from three sources: revenue from a marketer Until December 2019 when it payswas merged into IZEAx, we operated the Ebyline technology platform, which we acquired in January 2015. The Ebyline platform was originally designed as a self-service content marketplace to replace in-house editorial newsrooms in news agencies with a “virtual newsroom” to source and handle their content workflow with outside creators. After the acquisition, we began to utilize the creators in the Ebyline platform to produce professional custom content for brands, in addition to the self-service functionality used by newspapers. In July 2016, we acquired the ZenContent technology platform to use as an in-house workflow tool that enables us to produce highly scalable, multi-part production of content for both e-commerce entities and brand customers. The TapInfluence technology platform, acquired in 2018, performed in a similar manner to IZEAx and was being utilized by the majority of the TapInfluence customers as a self-service platform via a licensing arrangement, allowing access to the platform and its creators for self-managed marketing campaigns. After the migration of the last customers to IZEAx from the Ebyline platform in December 2019 and from the TapInfluence platform in February 2020, all marketplace revenue was solely generated from the IZEAx platform until the launch of Shake in November 2020.

In 2020, we launched two new platforms, BrandGraph and Shake. BrandGraph is a social media publisher or influencer suchintelligence platform that is heavily integrated with IZEAx and both platforms rely heavily on data from each other, but it is also available as a blogger or tweeter to share sponsoredstand-alone platform. The platform maps and classifies the complex hierarchy of corporation-to-brand relationships by category and associates social content with brands through a proprietary content analysis engine. Shake is a new online marketplace where buyers can quickly and easily hire creators of all types for influencer marketing, photography, design, and other digital services. The Shake platform is aimed at digital creatives seeking freelance “gig” work. Creators list available “Shakes” on their accounts in the platform and marketers select and purchase creative packages from them through a streamlined chat experience, assisted by ShakeBot - a proprietary, artificial intelligence assistant.

Impact of COVID-19 on our Business
Our operations, sales, and finances were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. In an effort to protect the health and safety of our employees, we took precautionary action and directed all staff to work from home effective March 16, 2020. During this work-from-home period, which is ongoing, the term of our leases for our headquarters and temporary office spaces expired. When and if we determine it prudent to end or modify our work-from-home policy, we may need to enter into a new lease for office space and/or arrangements for the use of co-working facilities.

24

While we are able to maintain full operations remotely, the economic conditions caused by COVID-19 have negatively impacted the business activity of our customers. We observed changes in advertising decisions, timing, and spending priorities from brand and agency customers, which have resulted in a negative impact to our revenue.

In light of the adverse economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented certain cost-reduction measures for the three months ended June 30, 2020, including hiring restrictions and temporary salary and wage reductions. Salary reductions averaged 20%, including a 21% reduction in the base salary for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer and in the fees of our directors. We also nearly eliminated travel expense for the remainder of 2020. In March 2020, we incurred debt by drawing on our secured credit facility and receiving a loan under the U.S. Small Business Association’s Paycheck Protection Program. After we were able to secure additional capital through sales of our common stock through an at the market offering program in June 2020, the secured credit facility was paid down by June 30, 2020, and the employee salary reductions and hiring restrictions were removed effective July 1, 2020.

In an effort to contain COVID-19 or slow its spread, governments around the world have from time to time enacted various measures, including orders to close all businesses not deemed “essential,” isolate residents to their homes or places of residence, and practice social network audience ("Sponsored Revenue")distancing when engaging in essential activities. These measures have impacted the method and timing of certain business meetings and our attendance at industry events. Rather than attending events in-person, as we have done historically, these events have been held virtually. We believe such events still are a valuable business opportunity, but their relative value without in-person networking is uncertain.

When COVID-19 is demonstrably contained, we anticipate a rebound in economic activity, depending on the rate, pace, and effectiveness of the containment efforts deployed by various national, state, and local governments; however, the timing and extent of any such rebound is uncertain. In the fourth quarter of 2020, we began to see a dramatic year over year increase in Managed Services bookings, our net orders from customers, resulting in 48% growth compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. That growth in bookings led to a 10% growth in overall revenue for the fourth quarter of 2020. While we have seen a continuation of that positive momentum for Managed Services bookings in the first quarter of 2021, there is still risk that bookings will not be recognized as revenue if customers cancel prior to the performance of service.
We will continue to actively monitor the situation and may take further actions altering our business operations that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers, partners, suppliers, and stakeholders, or as required by federal, state, or local authorities. It is not clear what the potential effects any such alterations or modifications may have on our business, including the effects on our customers, employees, and prospects, or on our future financial results.

Key Components of Results of Operations
Overall consolidated results of operations are evaluated based on Revenue, Cost of Revenue, Sales and Marketing expenses, General and Administrative expenses, Depreciation and Amortization, and Other Income (Expense), net.

Revenue
We historically generated revenue from five primary sources: (1) revenue from our managed services when a publishermarketer (typically a brand, agency or company purchasespartner) pays us to provide custom branded content, influencer marketing, amplification or other campaign management services (“Managed Services”); (2) revenue from fees charged to software customers on their marketplace spend within our IZEAx, Shake, and TapInfluence platforms (“Marketplace Spend Fees”); (3) revenue from fees charged to access the IZEAx, BrandGraph, Ebyline, and TapInfluence platforms (“License Fees”); (4) revenue from transactions generated by the self-service use of our Ebyline platform for its own use, as well as third partyprofessional custom content marketingworkflow (“Legacy Workflow Fees”); and native advertising efforts ("Content Revenue") and(5) revenue derived from various serviceother fees such as inactivity fees, early cash-out fees, and licensesubscription plan fees charged to users of our platforms ("(“Other Fees”). After the migration of the last customers from the Ebyline platform to IZEAx in December 2019, there is no longer any revenue generated from Legacy Workflow Fees and all such revenue is reported as Marketplace Spend Fees under the IZEAx platform.

As discussed in more detail within “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates” under “Note 1. Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” under Part I, Item 1 herein, revenue from Marketplace Spend Fees and Legacy Workflow Fees is reported on a net basis and revenue from all other sources, including Managed Services, License Fees, and Other Fees are reported on a gross basis. We further categorize these sources into two primary groups: (1) Managed Services and (2) SaaS Services, which includes revenue from Marketplace Spend Fees, License Fees, Legacy Workflow Fees, and Other Fees.


25

Cost of Revenue
Our cost of revenue consists of direct costs paid to our third-party creators who provide the custom content, influencer marketing or amplification services for our Managed Service Fee Revenue").customers where we report revenue on a gross basis. It also includes internal costs related to our campaign fulfillment and SaaS support departments. These costs include salaries, bonuses, commissions, stock-based compensation, employee benefit costs, and miscellaneous departmental costs related to the personnel who are primarily responsible for providing support to our customers and ultimately fulfillment of our obligations under our contracts with customers. Where appropriate, we capitalize costs that were incurred with software that is developed or acquired for our revenue supporting platforms and amortize these costs over the estimated useful lives of those platforms. This amortization is separately stated under depreciation and amortization in our consolidated statements of operations.


Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, bonuses, commissions, stock-based compensation, employee benefit costs, travel and miscellaneous departmental costs for our marketing, sales and sales support personnel, as well as marketing expenses such as brand marketing, public relation events, trade shows and marketing materials, and travel expenses.

General and Administrative
Our general and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries, bonuses, commissions, stock-based compensation, employee benefit costs, and miscellaneous departmental costs related to our executive, finance, legal, human resources, and other administrative personnel. It also includes travel, public company and investor relations expenses, as well as accounting and legal professional services fees, leasehold facilities, and other corporate-related expenses. General and administrative expense also includes our technology and development costs consisting primarily of our payroll costs for our internal engineers and contractors responsible for developing, maintaining, and improving our technology, as well as hosting and software subscription costs. These costs are expensed as incurred, except to the extent that they are associated with internal use software that qualifies for capitalization, which are then recorded as software development costs in the consolidated balance sheet. We also capitalize costs that are related to our acquired intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization related to these costs are separately stated under depreciation and amortization in our consolidated statements of operations. General and administrative expense also includes current period gains and losses on our acquisition costs payable, as well as gains and losses from the sale of fixed assets. Impairments on fixed assets, intangible assets and goodwill, are included as part of general and administrative expense when they are not material and broken out separately in our consolidated statements of operations when they are material.

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense consists primarily of amortization of our internal use software and acquired intangible assets from our business acquisitions. To a lesser extent, we also have depreciation and amortization on equipment and leasehold improvements used by our personnel. Costs are amortized or depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the associated assets.

Other Income (Expense)
Interest Expense. Interest expense is mainly related to the imputed interest on our acquisition costs payable and interest when we use our secured credit facility.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) consists primarily of interest income for interest earned or changes in the value of our foreign assets and liabilities and foreign currency exchange gains and losses on foreign currency transactions, primarily related to the Canadian Dollar.
26

Results of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to the Twelve Months EndedDecember 31, 20152020 and 2019


The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated statements of operations and the change between the periods:
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
20202019$ Change% Change
Revenue$18,329,555 $18,955,672 $(626,117)(3)%
Costs and expenses:  
Cost of revenue (exclusive of amortization)8,000,038 8,521,353 (521,315)(6)%
Sales and marketing5,999,671 6,240,263 (240,592)(4)%
General and administrative8,611,423 9,193,032 (581,609)(6)%
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets4,300,000 418,099 3,881,901 928 %
Depreciation and amortization1,652,126 1,750,629 (98,503)(6)%
Total costs and expenses28,563,258 26,123,376 2,439,882 %
Loss from operations(10,233,703)(7,167,704)(3,065,999)43 %
Other income (expense):  
Interest expense(63,012)(233,654)170,642 (73)%
Other income, net46,708 111,238 (64,530)(58)%
Total other income (expense), net(16,304)(122,416)106,112 (87)%
Net loss$(10,250,007)$(7,290,120)$(2,959,887)41 %
 Twelve Months Ended  
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 $ Change % Change
Revenue$27,310,602
 $20,467,926
 $6,842,676
 33.4 %
Cost of sales14,242,244
 12,236,916
 2,005,328
 16.4 %
Gross profit13,068,358
 8,231,010
 4,837,348
 58.8 %
Operating expenses:       
General and administrative10,282,792
 7,517,115
 2,765,677
 36.8 %
Sales and marketing10,261,910
 7,936,215
 2,325,695
 29.3 %
Total operating expenses20,544,702
 15,453,330
 5,091,372
 32.9 %
Loss from operations(7,476,344) (7,222,320) (254,024) (3.5)%
Other income (expense):       
Interest expense(82,944) (115,861) 32,917
 (28.4)%
Loss on exchange of warrants
 (1,845,810) 1,845,810
 (100.0)%
Change in fair value of derivatives, net9,163
 (2,133,820) 2,142,983
 (100.4)%
Other income (expense), net(10,075) 9,640
 (19,715) (204.5)%
Total other income (expense), net(83,856) (4,085,851) 4,001,995
 97.9 %
Net loss$(7,560,200) $(11,308,171) $3,747,971
 33.1 %



Revenues

Revenue
The following table breaks downillustrates our approximate revenue costby type, the percentage of salestotal revenue by type, and gross profitthe change between the periods:
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
20202019$ Change% Change
Managed Services Revenue$15,987,226 87 %$15,432,868 81 %$554,358 %
Legacy Workflow Fees— — %156,119 %(156,119)(100)%
Marketplace Spend Fees621,931 %1,270,560 %(648,629)(51)%
License Fees1,507,336 %1,986,285 10 %(478,949)(24)%
Other Fees213,062 %109,840 %103,222 94 %
SaaS Services Revenue2,342,329 13 %3,522,804 19 %(1,180,475)(34)%
Total Revenue$18,329,555 100 %$18,955,672 100 %$(626,117)(3)%

Managed Services revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, increased 4% from the same period in 2019, primarily due to several customers completing larger fourth quarter projects based on their marketing objectives as compared to the prior year period.
SaaS Services revenue is generated by revenue streamthe self-service use of our technology platforms by marketers to manage their own content workflow and influencer marketing campaigns. It consists of fees earned on the marketer’s spend within the IZEAx,BrandGraph, TapInfluence, and Ebyline platforms, along with the license and support fees to access the platform services.    
Legacy Workflow Fees are no longer generated after the migration of the last customers from the Ebyline platform to IZEAx in December 2019. Any activity from former legacy workflow customers is now generated under the IZEAx platform and reported as Marketplace Spend Fees.
Marketplace Spend Fees decreased by $648,629 for the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 when compared with the same period in 2019, primarily as a result of lower spend levels from our marketers and 2015:lower fees assessed on those spends as a result of competitive pricing efforts and the incorporation of lower margin legacy
27

 Twelve Months Ended
 December 31,
2016
December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
December 31,
2015
Revenue & % of Total     
Sponsored Revenue$16,704,000
61% $12,230,000
60%
Content Revenue10,231,000
37% 7,978,000
39%
Service Fees & Other Revenue375,000
2% 260,000
1%
Total Revenue$27,310,000
100% $20,468,000
100%
      
Cost of Sales & % of Total     
Sponsored COS$6,538,000
46% $5,177,000
42%
Content COS7,704,000
54% 7,060,000
58%
Service Fees & Other COS
% 
%
Total Cost of Sales$14,242,000
100% $12,237,000
100%
      
Gross Profit & Profit %     
Sponsored Revenue$10,166,000
61% $7,053,000
58%
Content Revenue2,527,000
25% 918,000
12%
Service Fees & Other Revenue375,000
100% 260,000
100%
Total Profit$13,068,000
48% $8,231,000
40%
workflow customers into IZEAx. Revenue from Marketplace Spend Fees represents our net margins received on this business. After the migration of the last customers from the TapInfluence platform to IZEAx in February 2020, all revenue was solely generated from the IZEAx platform until the launch of Shake in November 2020.
License Fees revenue decreased during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 to $1,507,336 compared to $1,986,285 in the same period of 2019. The decrease was partly due to former TapInfluence customers who churned during the second half of 2019. Additionally, we implemented a competitive standardized pricing system for all IZEAx license fee customers that was at a lower price point than the former TapInfluence licensing contracts.
RevenuesOther Fees revenue increased 94% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016increased2020 compared to the same period in 2019 due to increases in the number of subscriptions for certain new self-service offerings such as IZEAx Discovery and BrandGraph.

Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 decreased by $6,842,676,$521,315, or 33%approximately 6%, compared to the same period in 2015. Sponsored Revenue increased $4,474,000, Content Revenue increased $2,253,000 and Service Fee Revenue

increased $115,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. Sponsored Revenue increased2019 primarily due to our larger sales force, concentrated sales efforts toward larger IZEA managed campaigns rather than smaller marketer self-service campaigns and generating repeat business from existing customers. Content Revenue increased due to the same reasons as Sponsored Revenue, as well as a full twelve full monthsresult of Content Revenue reportedthe decrease in 2016 compared to only eleven monthsManaged Services revenue. Cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue remained consistent at 45% in 2015 as the Ebyline acquisition occurred on January 30, 2015. Service Fee Revenue increased2019 and 44% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 due to more licensing fees generated from the white-label partners in IZEAx.2020.

We estimate that revenue for the year ending December 31, 2017 will increase approximately 25% to approximately $34 million.Sales and Marketing

Our net bookings of $30.0 millionSales and marketing expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 were 23% higher than the net bookings of $24.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. Net bookings is a measure of sales orders received minus any cancellations2020 decreased by $240,592, or changes in a given period. Management uses net bookings as a leading indicator of future revenue recognition as revenue is typically recognized within 90-120 days of booking, though larger contracts may be recognized over twelve months from the original booking date. Net bookings can be affected by, among other things, cancellations or changes to orders that occur in future periods. Reductions in net bookings or changes in the expected timing of delivery for services due to delays and customer preferences or other considerations may result in fluctuations in expected future revenue. We experienced higher bookings as a result of the joint benefit of revenue gained by recent acquisitions and the increase in average deal size from existing and new customers alike. These bookings are expected to continue to translate into higher revenue in 2017 as compared to 2016.

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit

Our cost of sales is comprised primarily of amounts paid to our content creators to provide custom content or advertising services through the promotion of sponsored content in a blog post, tweet, click or action.
Cost of sales for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016increased by $2,005,328, or 16%approximately 4%, compared to the same period in 2015.  Cost2019. Our payroll and personnel related expenses and stock compensation for sales and marketing personnel decreased $52,000 as a result of sales increased primarilythe cost reductions and operating changes implemented after the outbreak of COVID-19. Travel related expenses decreased by $176,000 due to the increaseimpact of COVID-19 restricting travel beginning in our sales, but the increase was temperedMarch 2020 and subscription based software expenses decreased by the improved margins on our managed services for Content Revenue.
Gross profit for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016increased by $4,837,348, or 59%, compared$10,000 due to the same period in 2015.  Our gross profitnon-renewal of non-essential software as a percentage of revenue increased from 40% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 to 48% for the same period in 2016. Sponsored Revenue gross margin was 61% and Content Revenue gross margin was 25% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. We estimate that our average gross margins for the year ending December 31, 2017 will average approximately 47% to 48%.

The gross profit increase was primarily attributable to increased usepart of our managed services by marketers and agencies. Prior to being acquired by IZEA, Ebyline generated Content Revenue primarily from newspaper and traditional publishers through their workflow platform on a self-service basis at a 7% to 9% profit. After the acquisition, these customers still produce a significant amount of revenue, but we are increasing the sales of Content Revenue to customers on a managed basis and expect to see continued improvement in the Content Revenue margins. The mix of sales between our higher margin Sponsored Revenue and our lower margin Content Revenue (particularly the self-service workflow portion of this revenue) has a significant effect on our overall gross profit percentage.operating changes.


For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, managed services were 36% of Content Revenue compared to 14% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, the margins on the managed portion of Content Revenue increased by 18 percentage points for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 as we incorporated higher standard pricing guidelines into revenue during 2016 and we lowered our production costs after the acquisition of ZenContent in July 2016.

Operating Expenses
Operating expenses consist of general and administrative expenses and sales and marketing expenses.  Total operating expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 increased by $5,091,372, or 33%, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to increased personnel costs and additional overhead resulting from increased personnel.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of administrative and engineering personnel costs, general operating costs, public company costs, including non-cash stock compensation, acquisition costs, facilities costs, insurance,Administrative

depreciation, professional fees, and investor relations costs.  General and administrative expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 increased2020 decreased by $2,765,677,$581,609, or 37%approximately 6%, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to a $1 million increase in personnel costs2019. General and a $142,000 increase in variable costs related to personnel such as software and subscription costs, communication, travel and supply costs. These costs increased as a result of an increase in the average number of our administrative and engineering personnel by 34% since the prior year period along with increased costs for those personnel. Increased personnel costs are expected to continue in 2017 due to planned growth in the total number of administrative and engineering personnel needed to handle our growing organization.

On January 30, 2015, we purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Ebyline, Inc. for aggregate consideration up to $8,850,000, including guaranteed payments of $3,350,000 and contingent performance payments up to $5,500,000 based on Ebyline meeting certain revenue targets for each of the three years ending December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017. We initially determined the fair value of the contingent payments to be $2,210,000 using a Monte-Carlo simulation to simulate revenue over the next three years. Of this amount, $357,700 was determined to be future compensation expense and the $1,834,300 remainder was determined to be purchase consideration and recorded as acquisition costs payable. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, we reassessed the expected revenues to be produced from Ebyline over the next three years and did not believe that it would meet any of the targets required to achieve the performance payments. Therefore, we recorded a gain of $1,834,300 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015,2020 decreased due to a $802,000 reduction in payroll and personnel related expenses as a result of a 13% decrease in the number of employees compared to the prior year period and the 20% average decrease in salaries that was implemented for the second quarter of 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 cost reduction efforts. Rent expense also decreased by $370,000 due to the non-renewal of expiring office facility leases and travel costs decreased by $142,000 as our employees continue to work from home. These decreases were offset by an increase of $133,000 in contractor expenses as we began to increase the number of engineers working on our technology offerings. We also recorded a gain of $602,410 related to the settlement of our acquisition cost liabilities in 2019 that did not recur in 2020. The gain resulted due to the actual closing market price of our common stock on the date of settlement being lower than the 30-day volume weighted average price used to calculate the number of shares used to pay for the liability pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreements.

Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In March 2020, we identified triggering events due to the reduction in our estimated fairprojected revenue due to adverse economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the continuation of a market capitalization below our carrying value, of contingent acquisition costs payable.

On July 31, 2016, we purchased alland uncertainty for recovery given the volatility of the outstanding sharescapital markets surrounding COVID-19. We performed an interim assessment of capital stock of ZenContent, Inc. for aggregate consideration up to $4,500,000, including guaranteed payments of $2,000,000goodwill, using the discounted cash flow method under the income approach and contingent performance payments up to $2,500,000 based on ZenContent meeting certain revenue targets for each of the three years ending July 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019. We initially determinedguideline transaction method under the fair value of the contingent payments to be $230,000 using a Monte-Carlo simulation to simulate revenue over the next three years. As of December 31, 2016, we reassessed the expected revenues to be produced from ZenContent over the next three yearsmarket approach, and determined that currentthe carrying value of our Company’s reporting unit as of March 31, 2020 exceeded the fair value was $324,000. Therefore,value. As a result of the valuation, we recorded a $94,000$4.3 million impairment of goodwill resulting in an expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, we recorded impairment charges of $418,099 associated with our reduction in use of certain developed technology upon implementation of IZEAx 3.0 and the migration of TapInfluence customers and creators into the IZEAx platform.

Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 decreased by $98,503, or approximately 6%, compared to the same period in 2019.
28


Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment was $135,077 and $131,121 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Depreciation expense has increased slightly due to the purchase of new equipment in the fourth quarter of 2019 and first quarter of 2020.

Amortization expense was $1,517,049 and $1,619,508 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible assets acquired in the Ebyline, ZenContent, and TapInfluence acquisitions was $1,105,960 and $1,228,433 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, while amortization expense related to internal use software development costs was $411,089 and $391,075 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Amortization on our intangible acquisition assets decreased in 2020 as several of these assets were fully amortized during 2020. Amortization on our internal use software increased due to the release of IZEAx 3.0 in April 2019.

Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense decreased by $170,642 to $63,012 during the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 compared to a $1,834,300 gainthe same period in 2019 due primarily to the elimination of amounts owed on our acquisition costs payable and amortization thereon after July 2019 and partly to the reduction in our average borrowings on our secured credit facility during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, resulting in a net increase of $1,928,300 in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statement of operations, due2020 compared to the changesame period in our estimated fair value of contingent acquisition costs payable.2019.


A portion ofThe $64,530 decrease in other income during the guaranteed ZenContent payments are subject to downward adjustment of up to 30% if Brianna DeMike, ZenContent’s co-founder, is terminated by IZEA for cause or she terminates her employment without good reason. As a result, we initially reduced our acquisition cost liability by $300,000 to be accrued as compensation expense over the three-year term rather than allocatedtwelve months ended December 31, 2020 when compared to the purchase pricesame period in accordance with ASC 805-10-55-25. We increased acquisition costs payable2019 resulted primarily from reduced interest income received on cash balances as short term interest rates declined to near zero in 2020 after the outbreak of COVID-19 and general and administrative expense in currency exchange losses on our consolidated statement of operationsCanadian transactions in 2020.

Net Loss
Net loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 by $102,431 related to the portion that2020 was earned during the period.

The increase in general and administrative expenses is also attributable to$10,250,007, a $241,000 increase in depreciation and amortization expense during the three months ended December 31, 2016 as a result of the amortization of software development costs for IZEAx and the Ebyline and ZenContent intangible assets acquired; a $12,000 increase in contractor expense for outsourced engineering and finance projects; and a $131,000 increase in rent for our facilities and an additional office in Canada and California. Legal fees decreased by $784,000 from the prior year period due to the settlement of our patent litigation in August 2015.

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel costs related to employees and consultants who support sales and marketing efforts, promotional and advertising costs and trade show expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 increased by $2,325,695, or 29%, compared to the same period in 2015.  The increase was primarily attributable to a $2,552,000 increase in personnel costs and a $280,000 increase in variable costs related to personnel such as software and subscription costs, communication, travel and supply costs. These increases in the personnel costs are the result of a 23%$2,959,887 increase in the number of our sales and marketing personnel since the prior year along with a $328,000 increase in commission expense as a result of the increase in customer bookings. Travel costs included in the variable costs increased by 13% as a result of increased training and corporate events during the first half of 2016. Sales and marketing expenses also increased $74,000 in contractor expenses and $42,000 as a result of increased non-cash stock compensation costs related to the new employees. These increases were offset by a $621,000 decrease in public relations and marketing events during 2016 as compared to 2015. We anticipate these expenses will increase again in 2017 due to IZEAFest 2017, which was held in February 2017, and other planned marketing efforts.

Although we estimate that operating expenses will increase for the year ending December 31, 2017 as a result of our continued expansion and investment in future growth, we expect that operating expenses as a percentage of revenue will decline slightly for the year. We estimate that Adjusted EBITDA for the year ending December 31, 2017 will be approximately

negative $6 million as a result of our continued investment in sales and engineering staff necessary to increase our revenue and support our customers.

Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) consists primarily of interest expense, loss on exchange of warrants and the change in the fair value of derivatives.
Interest expense during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016decreased by $32,917 to $82,944 compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to the lower imputed interest on the remaining balance of acquisition costs payable.

From July 20, 2015 through August 14, 2015, we offered a 25% discount on the warrant exercise prices to investors holding the series A and series B warrants to purchase common stock issued in its August - September 2013 private placement (the “2013 Warrants”) and a 26% discount on the warrant exercise prices to investors holding series A and series B warrants to purchase common stock issued in its February 2014 private placement (the “2014 Warrants” and together with the 2013 Warrants, the "Warrants"). At the close of the offer period on August 14, 2015, Warrants for a total of 2,191,547 shares of common stock were exercised and converted into common stock at an average exercise price of $5.87 per share for total proceeds of $12,861,057 less $3,972 in transaction costs. The amendment of Warrants to reduce the exercise price required us to treat the adjustment as an exchange whereby it computed the fair value of the Warrants immediately prior to the price reduction and the fair value of the Warrants after the price reduction. The $1,845,810 change in the fair value of the Warrants as a result of the price reduction was treated as a loss on exchange and recorded in the consolidated statements of operations during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.
In prior years, we entered into financing transactions that gave rise to derivative liabilities. These financial instruments are carried at fair value in our financial statements. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are required to be recorded in other income (expense) in the period of change. We recorded expense of $9,163 and income of $2,133,820 resulting from the increase or decrease in the fair value of certain warrants and stock during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Due to the large exercise of Warrants in August 2015 resulting in fewer remaining warrants requiring re-measurement of fair values, we believe that these fluctuations will be little to none in future periods unless we enter into new financing transactions that create derivative liabilities.

The $19,715 change in other income (expense) is primarily the result of currency exchange losses related to our Canadian transactions during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.

Net Loss
Net loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 was $7,560,200, which decreased from a net loss of $11,308,171$7,290,120 for the same period in 2015.2019. The reductionincrease in net loss was primarily the result of the increasedimpairment on intangible assets discussed above offset by reductions in operating expenses.

29

Key Metric
We review information provided by our key financial metric, gross billings, to assess the progress of our business and make decisions on where to allocate our resources. As our business evolves, we may make changes to the key financial metrics that we consider to measure our business in future periods.

Gross Billings by Revenue Type
Company management evaluates our operations and makes strategic decisions based, in part, on our key metric of gross billings from our two primary types of revenue, Managed Services and profitSaaS Services. We define gross billings as the total dollar value of the amounts charged to our customers for the services we perform and the amounts billed to our SaaS customers for their self-service purchase of goods and services on our platforms. The amounts billed to our SaaS customers are on a cost plus basis. Gross billings are the amounts of our reported revenue plus the cost of payments we made to third-party creators providing the content or sponsorship services, which are netted against revenue for generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) reporting purposes.

Gross billings for Managed Services are the same as revenue reported for those services in our consolidated statements of operations on a GAAP basis, as there is no requirement to net the costs of revenue against the revenue. Gross billings for SaaS Services differ from revenue reported for these services in our consolidated statements of operations on a GAAP basis, as revenue for these services are presented net of the amounts we collect and pay to the third-party creators providing the content or sponsorship services to the self-service SaaS customer.

We consider gross billings to be an important indicator of our potential performance as it measures the total dollar volume of transactions generated through our marketplaces. Tracking gross billings allows us to monitor the percentage of gross billings that we are able to retain after payments to our creators. Additionally, tracking gross billings is critical as it pertains to our credit risk and cash flow. We invoice our customers based on our services performed or based on their self-service transactions plus our fee. Then we remit the agreed-upon transaction price to the creators. If we do not collect the money from our customers prior to the time of payment to our creators, we could experience large swings in our cash flows. Finally, gross billings allow us to evaluate our transaction totals on an equal basis in order for us to see our contribution margins along with a reduced expense fromby revenue stream so that we can better understand where we should be allocating our resources.

The following tables set forth our gross billings by revenue type, the percentage of total gross billings by type, and the change inbetween the fair value of derivative financial instruments partially offset by the increase in operating expenses as discussed above.periods:

Twelve Months Ended December 31,
20202019$ Change% Change
Managed Services Gross Billings$15,987,226 66%$15,432,868 53%$554,358 4%
Legacy Workflow Fees— —%2,155,550 7%(2,155,550)(100)%
Marketplace Spend Fees6,476,261 27%9,264,892 32%(2,788,631)(30)%
License Fees1,507,336 6%1,986,285 7%(478,949)(24)%
Other Fees213,062 1%109,840 1%103,222 94%
SaaS Services Gross Billings8,196,659 34%13,516,567 47%(5,319,908)(39)%
Total Gross Billings$24,183,885 100%$28,949,435 100%$(4,765,550)(16)%



Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresMeasure


Below are financial measures of cash operating expenses (“Cash Opex”) and Adjusted EBITDA. These areEBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is a “non-GAAP financial measure” as defined under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

We define Cash Opex as total operating expenses exclusive of unusual or non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, non-cash stock related compensation, gain or loss on asset disposals or impairment and changes in contingent acquisition costs, and all other non-cash income and expense items such as loss on exchanges and changes in fair value of derivatives, if applicable.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings or loss before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash stock relatedstock-based compensation, gain or loss on asset disposals or impairment, changes in contingent acquisition costs,cost estimates, and allcertain other unusual or non-cash income and expense items such as lossgains or losses on settlement of liabilities and exchanges, and changes in the fair value of derivatives, if applicable.


We use Cash Opex as a percentage of revenue and Adjusted EBITDA as measuresa measure of operating performance, for planning purposes, to allocate resources to
30

enhance the financial performance of our business, and in communications with our boardBoard of directorsDirectors regarding our financial performance. We believe that Cash Opex as a percentage of revenue and Adjusted

EBITDA also provideprovides useful information to investors as they excludeit excludes transactions not related to our core cashcash-generating operating business activities, including non-cash transactions, and they provideit provides consistency andto facilitate period-to-period comparisons. We believe that excluding these transactions allows investors to meaningfully trend and analyze the performance of our core cashcash-generating operations.

All companies do not calculate Cash Opex and Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner, and Cash Opex and Adjusted EBITDA as presented by us may not be comparable to Cash Opex and Adjusted EBITDA presented by other companies, which limits theirits usefulness as a comparative measures.

measure. Moreover, Cash Opex and Adjusted EBITDA havehas limitations as an analytical tools,tool, and you should not consider themit in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of our results of operations as reported under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”).GAAP. These limitations includeare that Cash Opex and Adjusted EBITDA:


dodoes not include stock-based compensation expense, which is a non-cash expense, but has been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, a significant recurring expense for our business and an important part of our compensation strategy;
dodoes not include stock issued for payment of services, which is a non-cash expense, but has been, and is expected to be for the foreseeable future, an important means for us to compensate our directors, vendors and other parties who provide us with services; and
dodoes not include changes in acquisition cost estimates as a result of the allocation of acquisition costs payable to compensation expense which may be a significant recurring expense for our business if we continue to make business acquisitions;
does not include gains or losses on the settlement of acquisition costs payable or liabilities when the stock value, as agreed upon in the agreement, varies from the market price of our stock on the settlement date. This is a non-cash expense, but was a recurring expense for our business on certain business contracts where the amounts could vary;
does not include depreciation and intangible assets amortization expense, impairment charges and gains or losses on disposal of equipment, which is not always a current period cash expense, but the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future.future; and

Furthermore, Adjusted EBITDA

excludes changes in fair value of derivatives,does not include interest expense and other gains, losses, and expenses that we do not believe are not indicative of our ongoing core operating results, but these items may represent a reduction or increase in cash available to us.


Because of these limitations, Cash Opex should not be considered as a measure of our total operating expenses, and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the operation and growth of our business or as a measure of cash that will be available to us to meet our obligations. You should compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using these non-GAAP financial measures as supplements. In evaluating these non-GAAP financial measures, you should be aware that in the future, we may incur expenses similar to those for which adjustments are made in calculating Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Opex.EBITDA. Our presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures should also not be construed to infer that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.


The following table sets forth a reconciliation from the GAAP measurement of Operating Expenses to our non-GAAP financial measure of Cash Opex and Cash Opex as a percentage of revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
 2016 2015
Total operating expenses$20,544,702
 $15,453,330
Less:   
Non-cash stock-based compensation748,092
 705,466
Non-cash stock issued for payment of services133,897
 177,842
Loss on disposal of equipment9,435
 595
Increase/(decrease) in value of contingent acquisition costs payable94,000
 (1,834,300)
Depreciation and amortization1,299,851
 1,059,131
Total excluded expenses2,285,275
 108,734
Cash Opex$18,259,427
 $15,344,596
    
Revenue$27,310,602
 $20,467,926
Cash Opex / Revenue67% 75%


The following table sets forth a reconciliation from the GAAP measurement of Netnet loss to our non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA for the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015:2019:
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
20202019
Net loss$(10,250,007)$(7,290,120)
Non-cash stock-based compensation477,993 634,651 
Non-cash stock issued for payment of services125,000 141,665 
Gain on settlement of acquisition costs payable— (602,410)
Increase in value of acquisition costs payable— 6,222 
Interest expense63,012 233,654 
Depreciation and amortization1,652,126 1,750,629 
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets4,300,000 418,099 
Other non-cash items(22,598)18,786 
Adjusted EBITDA$(3,654,474)$(4,688,824)
Revenue$18,329,555 $18,955,672 
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of Revenue(20)%(25)%
31
 Twelve Months Ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Net loss$(7,560,200) $(11,308,171)
Non-cash stock-based compensation748,092
 705,466
Non-cash stock issued for payment of services133,897
 177,842
Change in fair value of derivatives(9,163) 2,133,820
Loss on exchange of warrants
 1,845,810
Loss on disposal of equipment9,435
 595
Increase/(decrease) in value of contingent acquisition costs payable94,000
 (1,834,300)
Interest expense82,944
 115,861
Depreciation and amortization1,299,851
 1,059,131
Adjusted EBITDA$(5,201,144) $(7,103,946)



Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
We had cash and cash equivalents of $5,949,004 as of December 31, 2016 as compared to $11,608,452$33,045,225 as of December 31, 2015, a decrease2020 as compared to $5,884,629 as of $5,659,448December 31, 2019, an increase of $27,160,596, primarily due to net proceeds received from the fundingsale of our common stock in our at the market offering program, offset by operating losses. We have incurred significant net losses and negative cash flow from operations for most periods since our inception, which has resulted in a total accumulated deficit of $41,809,721$70,634,776 as of December 31, 2016.2020. To date, we have financed our operations through internally generated revenue from operations, borrowings under our secured credit facility, the PPP Loan (described below) and the sale and exercise of our equity securities.
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
20202019
Net cash (used for)/provided by:
Operating activities$(2,095,651)$(2,914,114)
Investing activities(354,407)(679,350)
Financing activities29,610,654 7,509,690 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents$27,160,596 $3,916,226 

Cash used for operating activities was $4,719,454$2,095,651 during the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and wasis primarily athe result of our loss from operations during the periodcontinued use of $7,476,344. Cashcash to cover operating losses. Net cash used for investing activities was $967,007$354,407 during the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 primarily due primarily to a $400,000 cashthe payment forof $363,793 in the purchase of ZenContent, and nearly $600,000 in purchases of computer and office equipment for our expanding staff and development of our proprietary software. CashNet cash provided by financing activities was $27,013during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and2020 was the result$29,610,654, which consisted primarily of net proceeds of approximately $27.7 million from the exercise of stock options offset by expenses on the issuance of shares and principal payments on our capital lease obligations.
On January 30, 2015, we purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Ebyline for aggregate consideration up to $8,850,000, including a cash payment at closing of $1,200,000, a stock issuance valued at $250,000 paid on July 30, 2015, $1,877,064 in two equal installments of $938,532 on the first and second anniversaries of the closing, and up to $5,500,000 in contingent performance payments, subject to Ebyline meeting certain revenue targets for each of the three years ending December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017. The $1,877,064 in annual payments and the $5,500,000 in contingent performance payments may be made in cash or common stock, at our option. The performance payments are to be made only if Ebyline achieves at least 90% of Content Revenue targets of $17,000,000 in 2015, $27,000,000 in 2016 and $32,000,000 in 2017. On January 29, 2016, we issued 114,398 shares of common stock valued at $848,832 to satisfy our first annual installment payment of $938,532 less $89,700 in closing related expenses owed as part of the January 2015 Ebyline Stock Purchase Agreement. On January 30, 2017,we issued 200,542 shares of common stock valued at $938,532 to satisfy the final annual guaranteed payment owed as part of the January 2015 Ebyline Stock Purchase Agreement. Based on actual results and future projections, we do not believe that we will owe any of the $5,500,000 in contingent performance payments related to the Ebyline acquisition.

On July 31, 2016, we purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of ZenContent. Upon closing we (a) paid a cash payment of $400,000 and (b) issued 86,207 sharessale of our common stock valuedin our at $600,000 (using the 30 trading-day volume-weighted average closing price of our common stock of $6.96 per share as of July 29, 2016). The agreement also requires (i) three equal annual installment payments totaling $1,000,000, commencing 12 months followingmarket offering program and approximately $1.9 million from the closing and (ii) contingent performance payments of up to an aggregate of $2,500,000 over the three 12-month periods following the closing, based upon ZenContent achieving certain minimum revenue thresholds. Of these payments, 33% of each such annual installment or contingent performance payment will be in the form of cash and the remainder of such payment will be in the form of either cash or additional shares of our common stock (determined at our option)PPP Loan (described below). If we decide to issue stock rather than

make cash payments, this may result in the issuance of substantial amount of shares because the number of shares will be determined using the 30 trading-day volume-weighted average closing price of our common stock prior to the payment.Secured Credit Facility

On April 13, 2015, we expanded ourWe have a secured credit facility agreement with Western Alliance Bank, the parent company of Bridge Bank, N.A. of San Jose, California ("Western Alliance").National Association. Pursuant to this agreement, we may submit requests for funding up to 80% of our eligible accounts receivable up to a maximum credit limit of $5 million. This agreement is secured by our accounts receivable and substantially all of our other assets. The agreement renews annually and requires us to pay an annual facility fee of $20,000 (0.4% of the credit limit) and an annual due diligence fee of $1,000. Interest accrues on the advances at the rate of prime plus 2% per annum. The default rate of interest is prime plus 7%. As of December 31, 2016,2020, we had no advancesamounts outstanding under this agreement. Assuming that all of our unfunded remaining trade accounts receivable balance was eligible for funding, we havehad approximately $4.1 million in available credit of $2,996,556 under the agreement as of December 31, 2016.2020.


We believe that, with our current cash and our available credit line withPPP Loan

On April 23, 2020, we received a loan from Western Alliance Bank (the “Lender”) in the principal amount of $1,905,100 (the “PPP Loan”) under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), which was established under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “SBA”). The term of the promissory note (the “Note”) issued in respect of the loan is two years, though it may be payable sooner in connection with an event of default under the Note. The PPP Loan carries a fixed interest rate of one percent per year. Certain amounts received under the PPP Loan may be forgiven if the loan proceeds are used for eligible purposes, including payroll costs and certain rent or utility costs, and we meet other requirements regarding, among other things, the maintenance of employment and compensation levels. Loan payments on the PPP Loan may be deferred to either (1) the date that the SBA remits our loan forgiveness amount to the Lender or (2) ten months after the end of our loan forgiveness covered period, if we do not apply for loan forgiveness. We submitted our forgiveness application for the entire amount of the loan in December 2020 and, as of the date of this Annual Report, are awaiting approval from the SBA. The forgiveness of the PPP Loan is based on our adherence to the forgiveness criteria under the CARES Act, and no assurance is provided that we will obtain forgiveness of the PPP Loan in whole or in part.

At the Market (ATM) Offering

On June 4, 2020 and January 25, 2021, we entered into ATM Sales Agreements (as amended, the “Sales Agreements”) with National Securities Corporation, as sales agent (“National Securities”), pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, through National Securities, shares of our common stock, by any method deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “ATM Offering”), for aggregate purchase prices of up to $40,000,000 and $35,000,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, we had sold 14,819,740 shares at an average price of $1.92 per share for total gross proceeds of $28,455,096. From January 1, 2021 to March 26, 2021, we sold 8,691,391 shares at an average price of $3.95 per share for gross proceeds of $34,311,634. Thus, total proceeds raised in the ATM Offering under our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-238619) as of March 26, 2021 were $62,766,730.
32


Financial Condition

We have seen impacts on our operations due to changes in advertising decisions, timing and spending priorities from our customers as a result of COVID-19, which has had and may continue to have a negative impact to our expected future sales and valuation estimates. With our cash on hand as of December 31, 2020, we expect to have sufficient cash reserves and financing sources available to cover expenses at least one year from the issuance of this Annual Report based on our current estimates of revenue and expenses for longer than the next twelve months. GivenWhile the volatility in U.S. equity markets and our normal working capital fluctuations, we may seekdisruption caused by COVID-19 is currently expected to raise additional capital at any time to supplement our operating cash flows to the extent we can do so on competitive market terms. In such event, an equity financing may dilute the ownership interestsbe temporary, it is generally outside of our common stockholders.control and there is uncertainty around the duration and the total economic impact. Therefore, this matter could have a further material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial position in future periods.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We doThe Company did not engage in any activities involving variable interest entities or off-balance“off-balance sheet arrangements.arrangements” (as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) as of December 31, 2020.


Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of the accompanyingWe prepare our financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAPaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Certain of our accounting policies require that we apply significant judgment in defining the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments will be subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Our judgments are based upon the historical experience of the Company, terms of existing contracts, observance of trends in the industry, information provided by our customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 — Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Annual Report. We consider accounting estimates to be critical accounting policies when:

The estimates involve matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made; and
different estimates or changes to estimates could have a material impact on the reported financial position, changes in financial position, or results of operations.

When more than one accounting principle, or method of its application, is generally accepted, we select the principle or method that we consider to be the most appropriate when given the specific circumstances. Application of these accounting principles requires us to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affectabout the amountsfuture resolution of existing uncertainties. Due to the inherent uncertainty involving estimates, actual results reported in the accompanying financial statements and the accompanying notes.  The preparation of these financial statements requires managements to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  When making these estimates and assumptions, we consider our historical experience, our knowledge of economic and market factors and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.  Actual results couldfuture may differ from theseour estimates. The following critical accounting policies are significantly affected by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.


Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk

Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. We consider an account to be delinquent when the customer has not paid its balance due by the associated due date. Uncollectibility of accounts receivable is not significant since most customers are bound by contract and are required to fund us for all the costs of an “opportunity,” defined as an order created by a marketer for a creator to write about the marketer’s product.develop or share content on behalf of a marketer. If a portion of the account balance is deemed uncollectible, we will either write-off the amount owed or provide a reserve based on our best estimate of the uncollectible portion of the account. Management determinesestimates the collectibility of accounts by regularly evaluating individual customer receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit history, and current economic conditions. We have a reserve of $237,000$155,000 for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2016.2020. We believe that this estimate is reasonable, but there can be no assurance that the estimate will not change as a result of a change in economic conditions or business conditions within the industry, the individual customers or our Company. Any adjustments to this account are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as a general and administrative expense. Bad debt expense was less than 1% of revenue for each of the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015.2019.


Throughout 2013Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable were typically limited, because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up our customer base, thus spreading the trade credit risk. However, with our acquisition of TapInfluence, we have increased credit exposure on certain customers who carry significant credit balances related to their Marketplace Spend. We control credit risk through credit approvals, credit limits, and monitoring procedures.
33

We perform credit evaluations of our customers, but generally do not require collateral to support accounts receivable. We had no customer that accounted for more than 10% of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2020 and 2019. We had one customer that accounted for 12% of our revenue during the first quartertwelve months ended December 31, 2020 and no customer that accounted for more than 10% of 2014, we developed our new web-based advertising exchange platform, IZEAx. This platform is being utilized both internallyrevenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.


Software Development Costs and externally to facilitate native advertising campaigns on a greater scale. We continue to add new features and additional functionality to this platform each year. These new features will enable our platform to facilitate the contracting, workflow and delivery of direct custom content as well as provide for invoicing, collaborating and direct payments for our SaaS customers. Acquired Intangible Software

In accordance with ASCAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350-40, Internal Use Software, we capitalize certain internal use software development costs associated with creating and ASC 985-730, Computerenhancing internally developed software related to our platforms. Software Researchdevelopment activities generally consist of three stages (i) the research and Development,planning stage, (ii) the application and development stage, and (iii) the post-implementation stage. Costs incurred in the research phase costs should beand planning stage and in the post-implementation stage of software development, or other maintenance and development expenses that do not meet the qualification for capitalization, are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in the application and infrastructure development phasestage, including significant enhancements and upgrades, are capitalized. These costs includinginclude personnel and related employee benefits expenses for employees or consultants who are directly associated with and who devote time to software projects, and external direct costs of materials and services, payroll and benefits and interestobtained in developing the software. We also capitalize certain costs may be capitalized. As a result, weassociated with cloud computing arrangements ("CCAs"). We have capitalized $1,492,665 in direct materials, consulting, payroll and benefit costs to software development costs of $3,036,810 in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.2020. We estimatealso have additional proprietary software platforms valued at $820,000 from our acquisitions of Ebyline, ZenContent, and TapInfluence. These costs are reflected as intangible assets in the useful lifeconsolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. We do not transfer ownership of our software to be 5third parties. These software development, acquired technology and CCA costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of five years consistent withupon initial release of the amount of time our legacy platforms were in-service, and we are amortizingsoftware or additional features. We review the software development costs for impairment when circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the carrying value of an asset group is not recoverable, we recognize an impairment loss for the excess of carrying value over this period.the fair value in our consolidated statements of operations.


Goodwill and Business Combinations

Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred for an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying identifiable net assets. We derivehave goodwill in connection with our acquisitions of Ebyline, ZenContent, and TapInfluence. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead it is tested for impairment at least annually. In the event that management determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, we will record a charge for the amount of impairment during the fiscal quarter in which the determination is made.

We perform our annual impairment tests of goodwill as of October 1 of each year, or more frequently, if certain indicators are present. For instance, in March 2020, we identified triggering events, including the reduction in our projected revenue due to adverse economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the continuation of a market capitalization below our carrying value, and uncertainty for recovery given the volatility of the capital markets surrounding COVID-19. Therefore, we performed an interim assessment of goodwill, using the discounted cash flow method under the income approach and the guideline transaction method under the market approach, and determined that the carrying value of our Company’s reporting unit as of March 31, 2020 exceeded the fair value. As a result of the March 2020 valuation, we recorded a $4.3 million impairment of goodwill which is reflected as an expense in the consolidated statements of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020.

Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below the operating segment level, which is referred to as a component. Management identifies its reporting units by assessing whether components (i) have discrete financial information available; (ii) engage in business activities; and (iii) whether a segment manager regularly reviews the component's operating results. Net assets and goodwill of acquired businesses are allocated to the reporting unit associated with the acquired business based on the anticipated organizational structure of the combined entities. If two or more components are deemed economically similar, those components are aggregated into one reporting unit when performing the annual goodwill impairment review. We have determined that we have one reporting unit.

Revenue Recognition

We historically generated revenue from threefive primary sources: (1) revenue from our managed services when a marketer when it(typically a brand, agency or partner) pays us to provide custom content, influencer marketing, amplification or other campaign management services (“Managed Services”); (2) revenue from fees charged to software customers on their marketplace spend
34

within our IZEAx, Shake, and TapInfluence platforms (“Marketplace Spend Fees”); (3) revenue from fees charged to access the IZEAx, BrandGraph, Ebyline, and TapInfluence platforms (“License Fees”); (4) revenue from transactions generated by the self-service use of our Ebyline platform for a social media publisher or influencer such as a blogger or tweeter ("creators") to share sponsoredprofessional custom content with their social network audience ("Sponsored Revenue"workflow (“Legacy Workflow Fees”),

revenue when a publisher or company purchases custom branded content for its own use, as well as third party content marketing; and native advertising efforts ("Content Revenue") and(5) revenue derived from various serviceother fees such as inactivity fees, early cash-out fees, and licensesubscription plan fees charged to users of our platforms ("Service Fee Revenue"(“Other”). After the migration of the last customers from the Ebyline platform to IZEAx in December 2019, there is no longer any revenue generated from Legacy Workflow Fees and all such revenue is reported as Marketplace Spend Fees under the IZEAx platform.


We recognize revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized based on a five-step model as follows: (i) identify the contract with the customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied. The core principle of ASC 606 is that revenue is recognized when the transfer of promised goods or services to customers is made in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We apply the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that it will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, we assess the goods or services promised within each contract and determine those that are distinct performance obligations. We also determine whether we act as an agent or a principal for each identified performance obligation. The determination of whether we act as the principal or the agent is highly subjective and requires us to evaluate a number of indicators individually and as a whole in order to make our determination. For transactions in which we act as a principal, revenue is reported on a gross basis as the amount paid by the marketer for the purchase of content or sponsorship, promotion and other related services and we record the amounts we pay to third-party creators as cost of revenue. For transactions in which we act as an agent, revenue is reported on a net basis as the amount we charged to the self-service marketer using our platforms, less the amounts paid to the third-party creators providing the service.

We maintain separate arrangements with each marketer and content creator either in the form of a master agreement or terms of service, which specify the terms of the relationship and access to its platforms, or by statement of work, which specifies the price and the services to be performed, along with other terms. The transaction price is determined based on the fixed fee stated in the statement of work and does not contain variable consideration. Marketers who contract with us to manage their advertising campaigns or custom content requests may prepay for services or request credit terms. Payment terms are typically 30 days from the invoice date. The agreement typically provides for either a non-refundable deposit, or a cancellation fee if the agreement is canceled by the customer prior to completion of services. Billings in advance of completed services are recorded as a contract liability until earned. We assess collectibility based on a number of factors, including the creditworthiness of the customer and payment and transaction history.

Managed Services Revenue

For our managed customers,Managed Services Revenue, we enter into an agreement to provide services that may requireinclude multiple deliverablesdistinct performance obligations in the form of: (i) an integrated marketing campaign to provide influencer marketing services, which may include the provision of (a) sponsored social items, such as blogs, tweets, photos or videos shared through social network offerings that provide awareness or advertising buzz regarding the marketer's brand; (b) media advertisements,and content promotion, such as click-through advertisements appearing in websites and social media channelschannels; and (c) original(ii) custom content items, such as a research or news article, informational material or videos that a publishervideos. Marketers typically purchase influencer marketing services for the purpose of providing public awareness or other marketer canadvertising buzz regarding the marketer’s brand and they purchase custom content for internal and external use. We may provide one type or a combination of all types of these deliverables including a management feeperformance obligations on a statement of work for a lump sum fee. We allocate revenue to each performance obligation in the contract at inception based on its relative standalone selling price. These deliverablesperformance obligations are to be provided over a stated period that may rangegenerally ranges from one day to one year. Each of these items are considered delivered once the content is live through a public or social network or custom content has been delivered to the customer for their own use. Revenue is accounted for separatelywhen the performance obligation has been satisfied depending on each of the deliverables in the time frames set forth below. The statement of work typically provides for a cancellation fee if the agreement is canceled by the customer prior to our completion of services. Payment terms are typically 30 days from the invoice date. If we are unable to provide a portion of the services, we may agree with the customer to provide a different type of service orprovided. We view our obligation to providedeliver influencer marketing services, including management services, as a credit forsingle performance obligation that is satisfied over time as the value of those services that may be applied tocustomer receives the existing order or used for futurebenefits from the services.

Sponsored Revenue is recognized using an input method of costs incurred compared to total expected costs to measure the progress towards satisfying the overall performance obligation of the marketing campaign. The delivery of custom content represents a distinct performance obligation that is satisfied over time as we have no alternative for the custom content, and considered earned afterwe have an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date under the contracts. We consider custom content to be a marketer's sponsoredseries of distinct services that are substantially the same and that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer, and revenue is recognized over time using an output method based on when each individual piece of content is delivered to the customer. Based on our evaluations, revenue from Managed Services is reported on a gross basis because we have the primary obligation to fulfill the performance obligations and we create, review, and control the services. We take on the risk of payment to any third-party creators, and we establish the contract price directly with our customers based on the services requested in the statement of work.

35

Marketplace Spend Fees and Legacy Workflow Fees Revenue

For Marketplace Spend Fees and Legacy Workflow Fees Revenue, the self-service customer instructs creators found through the Company’s platforms to provide and/or distribute custom content for an agreed upon transaction price. Our platforms control the contracting, description of services, acceptance of and payment for the requested content. This service is used primarily by news agencies or marketers to control the outsourcing of their content and advertising needs. We charge the self-service customer the transaction price plus a fee based on the contract. Revenue is recognized when the transaction is completed by the creator and accepted by the marketer or verified as posted by the system. Based on our evaluations, this revenue is reported on a net basis since we are acting as an agent solely arranging for the third-party creator or influencer to provide the services directly to the self-service customer through the platform or by posting the requested content.

License Fees Revenue

License Fees Revenue is generated through the granting of limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable licenses to customers for the use of the IZEAx, BrandGraph, and shared through a creator's social networkuntil February 2020, the TapInfluence technology platforms for a requisite period of time. The requisite period ranges from 3 daysan agreed-upon subscription period. Customers license the platforms to manage their own influencer marketing campaigns. Fees for a tweet to 30 days for a blog, videosubscription or other form of content. Management fees related to Sponsored Revenue from advertising campaigns managed by uslicensing services are recognized ratablystraight-line over the term of the campaign which may range from a few days to several months. Contentservice.

Other Fees Revenue is recognized when the content is delivered to and accepted by the customer. Service Fee

Other Fees Revenue is generated when fees are charged to customersour platform users primarily related to subscriptionmonthly plan fees, for different levels of serviceinactivity fees, and early cash-out fees. Plan fees are recognized within the month they relate to, inactivity fees are recognized at a platform, licensing fees for white-label use of IZEAx,point in time when the account is deemed inactive, and early cash-out fees ifare recognized when a creator wishes to take proceeds earned for services from their account when the account balancecash-out is either below certain minimum balance thresholds or when accelerated payout timing is requested.

We do not typically engage in contracts that are longer than one year. Therefore, we do not capitalize costs to obtain our customer contracts as these amounts generally would be recognized over a period of less than one year and inactivity fees for dormant accounts. Service Fee Revenue is recognized immediately whenare not material.

Changes in how we control and manage our platforms, our contractual terms, our business practices, or other changes in accounting standards or interpretations, may change the service is performed or at the time an account becomes dormant or is cashed out. Service Fee Revenue for subscription or licensing fees is recognized straight-line over the term of service. Self-service marketers must prepay for services by placing a deposit in their account with us.  The deposits are typically paid by the marketer via credit card. Marketers who use us to manage their social advertising campaigns or content requests may prepay for services or request credit terms. Payments received or billings in advance of services are recorded as unearned revenue until earned as described above.

Allreporting of our revenue is generated through the rendering of services and is recognized under the general guidelines of SAB Topic 13 A.1, which states that revenue will be recognized when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider our revenue as generally realized or realizable and earned once (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) services have been rendered, (iii) the price to the marketer or customer is fixed (required to be paid at a set amount that is not subject to refund or adjustment) and determinable, and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. We record revenue on the gross amount earned since we generally are the primary obligor in the arrangement, take on credit risk, establish the pricing and determine the service specifications.revenue.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period. We estimate the fair value of each stock option as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Options typically vest ratably over four years with one-fourth of options vesting one year from the date of grant and the remaining options vesting monthly, in equal increments over the remaining three-year period and generally have five or ten-year contract lives. We use the simplified method to estimate the fair valueexpected term of our commonemployee stock usingoptions, because we do not believe historical exercise data will provide a reasonable basis for estimating the expected term for the current share options granted. The simplified method assumes that employees will exercise share options evenly between the period when the share options are vested and ending on the date when the options would expire.We use the closing stock price of our common stock on the date of the option award.  Wegrant as the associated fair value of our common stock. For issuances after June 30, 2019, we estimate the volatility of our common stock at the date of grant based on the volatility of our stock during the period. For issuances on or prior to June 30, 2019, we estimated the volatility of our common stock at the date of grant based on the volatility of comparable peer companies that arewere publicly traded and have had a longer trading history than us. We determine the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and post-vesting forfeitures. We use the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term approximately equal to the expected life of the award. We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We estimate forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and this estimate of forfeitures is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change, and a revised amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.

The following table shows the number of stock options granted under our 2011 Equity Incentive Plans and the assumptions used to determine the fair value of those options during the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015:2019:

36

2011 Equity Incentive Plans - Options Granted
Period Ended Total Options Granted Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Expected Term Weighted Average Volatility Weighted Average Risk Free Interest Rate Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
December 31, 2015 277,059
 $7.43 6.0 years 55.47% 1.65% $3.84
December 31, 2016 179,998
 $6.16 6.0 years 47.95% 1.58% $2.88
Twelve Months EndedTotal Options GrantedWeighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Expected TermWeighted Average VolatilityWeighted Average Risk-Free Interest RateExpected DividendsWeighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Weighted average expected forfeiture rate
December 31, 2019586,552 $0.676.0 years64.38%1.92%— $0.409.26%
December 31, 2020411,350 $0.696.0 years108.58%0.46%— $0.567.72%
 
Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, and employee stock purchase plan issuance during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $477,993 and $634,651, respectively.

There were outstanding options to purchase 959,8641,712,806 shares with a weighted average exercise price of $8.11$2.56 per share, of which options to purchase 545,558997,320 shares were exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $9.20$3.84 per share, as of December 31, 2016.2020. The intrinsic value on outstanding options as of December 31, 20162020 was $8,080.$1,127,194. The intrinsic value on exercisable options as of December 31, 20162020 was $7,098.$364,866.


We account for derivative instruments in accordanceAs of December 31, 2020, we had unvested restricted stock units representing 970,349 shares of common stock with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging , which requires additional disclosures about the our objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and how the derivative instruments and related hedging items affect the financial statements. We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risk. Terms of equity instruments are reviewed to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under ASC 815 to be accounted for separately from the host contract, and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fairan intrinsic value of derivative liabilities, if any, is required to be revalued at each reporting date,$1,766,035 and 13,666 unvested shares of issued restricted stock with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in current period operating results. Pursuant to ASC 815, an evaluation of specifically identified conditions is made to determine whether the fairintrinsic value of warrants issued is required to be classified as equity or as a derivative liability.$24,872.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements


See "Note“Note 1. Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," under Part II, Item 8 in Part II of this Form 10-K.Annual Report for information on additional recent pronouncements.



ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

37


ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Winter Park, Florida



Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of IZEA Worldwide, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20162020 and 2015, and2019, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years then ended. in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020 and 2019 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audits included considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters
In our opinion,
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements referredthat were communicated or required to above present fairly,be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in allany way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Revenue Recognition - Estimated Costs to Complete for Managed Services Revenue

As described in Notes 1 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, for Managed Services Revenue, the Company enters into an agreement to provide services that may include multiple distinct performance obligations in the form of: (i) an integrated marketing campaign to provide influencer marketing services, which may include the provision of blogs, tweets, photos or videos shared through social network offerings and content promotion, such as click-through advertisements appearing in websites and social media channels; and (ii) custom content items, such as a research or news article, informational material respects,or videos. The Company views its obligation to deliver influencer marketing services, including management services, as a single performance obligation that is satisfied over time as the financial positioncustomer receives the benefits from the services. Revenue is
38

recognized using an input method of costs incurred compared to total expected costs to measure the progress towards satisfying the overall performance obligation of the marketing campaign. The delivery of custom content represents a distinct performance obligation that is satisfied over time as the Company has no alternative for the custom content and the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date under the contracts. The Company considers custom content to be a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer, and revenue is recognized over time based on an output model method based on when each individual piece of content is delivered to the customer.

We identified the estimation of costs to complete on the Company’s obligation to deliver influencer marketing services, including management services, on Managed Services contracts to be a critical audit matter. The determination of the total estimated cost and progress toward completion on contracts not completed requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions primarily related to estimated direct labor and applicable subcontract costs needed to complete contracts. Changes in these estimated direct labor and applicable subcontract costs can have a significant impact on the revenue recognized in each period. Auditing such estimates involved especially challenging and subjective auditor judgment to determine the reasonableness of management’s assumptions and estimates that ultimately determine the amount of revenue to recognize.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Evaluating management’s ability to accurately estimate total costs to complete by (i) performing a retrospective review to compare prior year estimates of costs to complete for open Managed Services contracts to actual costs incurred upon completion of the contract or updated estimated costs at completion if the contract is still not complete and (ii) evaluating whether contracts which were previously completed earned any additional revenues after the contract was assumed to be completed.
Assessing the reasonableness of the estimated costs to complete on open contracts as of December 31, 20162020 through evaluation of the consistency of expected margins on open contracts to historical margins on completed contracts.

Goodwill Impairment

As described in Notes 1 and 2015,3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has goodwill of $4.0 million as of December 31, 2020, all of which relates to the Company’s single reporting unit. The Company’s goodwill is the result of the acquisitions of Ebyline, ZenContent, and TapInfluence in previous years. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently, if certain indicators are present. In the event that management determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, they will record a charge for the amount of impairment during the fiscal quarter in which the determination is made. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company identified triggering events related to the reduction in its projected revenue due to adverse economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the continuation of a market capitalization below the Company’s carrying value and uncertainty for recovery given the volatility of the capital markets surrounding COVID-19 and performed an interim valuation to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit. As a result of the impairment assessment performed by the Company a $4.3 million impairment of goodwill was recorded during the year ending December 31, 2020. The Company used the discounted cash flow method under the income approach and the guideline transaction method under the market approach to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit.

We identified the estimate of the fair value of the Company’s single reporting unit as a critical audit matter. Estimation of the fair value of the Company’s single reporting unit requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to future cash flows, growth rates for the business, future economic conditions, and discount rates. Auditing management’s assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the single reporting unit was especially challenging due to the nature of audit effort required to address the subjective estimates, including the extent of specialized skill and knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Assessing the reasonableness of estimated future cash flows based on the growth rates for the business and future economic conditions, including the impact of COVID-19, by comparing the estimated future cash flows to (i) historical operating results of its operationsthe Company, and its cash flows for(ii) information included in industry reports and publicly available information related to the years then ended,industry in conformitywhich the Company operates.

Utilizing personnel with accounting principles generally acceptedspecialized knowledge and skill in valuation to assist in: (i) evaluating the United Statesreasonableness of America.the valuation methodologies utilized by the Company, (ii) testing the reasonableness of the Company-specific discount rate used against other comparable publicly traded companies, and (iii) evaluating the appropriateness of the revenue multiple used, including testing the source information utilized.

39




/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2015.
Tampa,
Orlando, Florida
March 28, 201730, 2021

40


IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
   December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Assets   Assets
Current:   
Current assets:Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$5,949,004
 $11,608,452
Cash and cash equivalents$33,045,225 $5,884,629 
Accounts receivable, net3,745,695
 3,917,925
Accounts receivable, net5,207,205 5,596,719 
Prepaid expenses322,377
 193,455
Prepaid expenses199,294 400,181 
Other current assets11,940
 16,853
Other current assets74,467 153,031 
Total current assets10,029,016
 15,736,685
Total current assets38,526,191 12,034,560 
   
Property and equipment, net460,650
 596,008
Property and equipment, net230,918 309,780 
Goodwill3,604,720
 2,468,289
Goodwill4,016,722 8,316,722 
Intangible assets, net1,662,536
 1,806,191
Intangible assets, net505,556 1,611,516 
Software development costs, net1,103,959
 813,932
Software development costs, net1,472,684 1,519,980 
Security deposits161,736
 117,946
Security deposits151,803 
Total assets$17,022,617
 $21,539,051
Total assets$44,752,071 $23,944,361 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ EquityLiabilities and Stockholders’ Equity  
Current liabilities:Current liabilities:  
Accounts payableAccounts payable$1,880,144 $2,252,536 
Accrued expensesAccrued expenses1,924,973 1,377,556 
Contract liabilitiesContract liabilities7,180,264 6,466,766 
Current portion of notes payableCurrent portion of notes payable1,477,139 
Lease liabilityLease liability83,807 
Total current liabilitiesTotal current liabilities12,462,520 10,180,665 
Finance obligation, less current portionFinance obligation, less current portion43,808 45,673 
Notes payable, less current portionNotes payable, less current portion459,383 
Total liabilitiesTotal liabilities12,965,711 10,226,338 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 7)Commitments and Contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders’ equity:Stockholders’ equity:  
Preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstandingPreferred stock; $.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
Common stock; $.0001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 50,050,167 and 34,634,172, respectively, issued and outstandingCommon stock; $.0001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 50,050,167 and 34,634,172, respectively, issued and outstanding5,005 3,464 
Additional paid-in capitalAdditional paid-in capital102,416,131 74,099,328 
Accumulated deficitAccumulated deficit(70,634,776)(60,384,769)
Total stockholders’ equityTotal stockholders’ equity31,786,360 13,718,023 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equityTotal liabilities and stockholders’ equity$44,752,071 $23,944,361 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity   
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$1,438,389
 $995,275
Accrued expenses1,242,889
 908,519
Unearned revenue3,315,563
 3,584,527
Current portion of deferred rent34,290
 14,662
Current portion of capital lease obligations
 7,291
Current portion of acquisition costs payable1,252,885
 844,931
Total current liabilities7,284,016
 6,355,205
    
    
Deferred rent, less current portion62,547
 102,665
Acquisition costs payable, less current portion688,191
 889,080
Warrant liability
 5,060
Total liabilities8,034,754
 7,352,010
    
Commitments and Contingencies
 
    
Stockholders’ equity: 
  
Preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
 
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 5,456,118 and 5,222,951, respectively, issued and outstanding545
 522
Additional paid-in capital50,797,039
 48,436,040
Accumulated deficit(41,809,721) (34,249,521)
Total stockholders’ equity8,987,863
 14,187,041
    
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$17,022,617
 $21,539,051











See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

41

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
  Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
  2016 2015
     
Revenue $27,310,602
 $20,467,926
Cost of sales 14,242,244
 12,236,916
Gross profit 13,068,358
 8,231,010
     
Operating expenses:  
  
General and administrative 10,282,792
 7,517,115
Sales and marketing 10,261,910
 7,936,215
Total operating expenses 20,544,702
 15,453,330
     
Loss from operations (7,476,344) (7,222,320)
     
Other income (expense):  
  
Interest expense (82,944) (115,861)
Loss on exchange of warrants 
 (1,845,810)
Change in fair value of derivatives, net 9,163
 (2,133,820)
Other income (expense), net (10,075) 9,640
Total other income (expense) (83,856) (4,085,851)
     
Net loss $(7,560,200) $(11,308,171)
     
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted 5,380,465
 3,737,897
Basic and diluted loss per common share $(1.41) $(3.03)
and Comprehensive Loss
 

 Twelve Months Ended December 31,
20202019
Revenue$18,329,555 $18,955,672 
Costs and expenses:  
Cost of revenue (exclusive of amortization)8,000,038 8,521,353 
Sales and marketing5,999,671 6,240,263 
General and administrative8,611,423 9,193,032 
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets4,300,000 418,099 
Depreciation and amortization1,652,126 1,750,629 
Total costs and expenses28,563,258 26,123,376 
Loss from operations(10,233,703)(7,167,704)
Other income (expense):  
Interest expense(63,012)(233,654)
Other income, net46,708 111,238 
Total other income (expense), net(16,304)(122,416)
Net loss$(10,250,007)$(7,290,120)
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted41,289,705 25,516,573 
Basic and diluted loss per common share$(0.25)$(0.29)















































See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

42

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity





 Common StockAdditional
Paid-In
AccumulatedTotal
Stockholders’
 SharesAmountCapitalDeficitEquity
Balance, December 31, 201812,075,708 $1,208 $60,311,756 $(53,094,649)$7,218,315 
Sale of securities14,285,714 1,429 9,998,571 — 10,000,000 
Stock issued for payment of acquisition liability8,015,876 801 4,003,596 — 4,004,397 
Stock purchase plan issuances26,411 6,976 — 6,979 
Stock issued for payment of services83,826 141,657 — 141,665 
Stock issuance costs— — (788,752)— (788,752)
Stock-based compensation146,637 15 425,524 — 425,539 
Net loss— — — (7,290,120)(7,290,120)
Balance, December 31, 201934,634,172 $3,464 $74,099,328 $(60,384,769)$13,718,023 
Sale of securities14,819,740 1,482 28,453,614 — 28,455,096 
Stock purchase plan & option exercise issuances15,573 7,633 — 7,634 
Stock issued for payment of services390,625 39 124,961 — 125,000 
Stock issuance costs— — (747,379)— (747,379)
Stock-based compensation190,057 19 477,974 — 477,993 
Net loss— — — (10,250,007)(10,250,007)
Balance, December 31, 202050,050,167 $5,005 $102,416,131 $(70,634,776)$31,786,360 

  Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-In
 Accumulated 
Total
Stockholders’
  Shares Amount Capital Deficit Equity
Balance, December 31, 2014 2,885,424
 $289
 $27,200,536
 $(22,941,350) $4,259,475
Fair value of warrants issued 
 
 51,950
 
 51,950
Fair value of 2014 private placement warrants reclassified from liability to equity & loss on exchange 
 
 7,178,035
 
 7,178,035
Stock issued for payment of acquisition liability 31,821
 3
 249,997
 
 250,000
Exercise of warrants 2,191,547
 219
 12,860,838
 
 12,861,057
Stock purchase plan subscriptions 13,403
 1
 76,169
 
 76,170
Stock issued for payment of services 100,756
 10
 125,982
 
 125,992
Stock issuance costs 
 
 (12,933) 
 (12,933)
Stock-based compensation 
 
 705,466
 
 705,466
Net loss 
 
 
 (11,308,171) (11,308,171)
Balance, December 31, 2015 5,222,951
 $522
 $48,436,040
 $(34,249,521) $14,187,041
Stock issued for payment of acquisition liability 200,605
 20
 1,448,812
 
 1,448,832
Stock purchase plan issuances 11,453
 1
 58,020
 
 58,021
Stock issued for payment of services 21,109
 2
 129,792
 
 129,794
Stock issuance costs 
 
 (23,717) 
 (23,717)
Stock-based compensation 
 
 748,092
 
 748,092
Net loss 
 
 
 (7,560,200) (7,560,200)
Balance, December 31, 2016 5,456,118
 $545
 $50,797,039
 $(41,809,721) $8,987,863























































See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

43

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
2016 201520202019
Cash flows from operating activities:   Cash flows from operating activities:  
Net loss$(7,560,200) $(11,308,171)Net loss$(10,250,007)$(7,290,120)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities: 
  
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:  
Depreciation and amortization253,004
 206,670
Depreciation and amortization135,077 131,121 
Amortization of software development costs and other intangible assets1,046,847
 852,461
Amortization of software development costs and other intangible assets1,517,049 H1,619,508 
Loss on disposal of equipment9,435
 595
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assetsImpairment of goodwill and intangible assets4,300,000 418,099 
(Gain) loss on disposal of equipment(Gain) loss on disposal of equipment(22,598)18,786 
Provision for losses on accounts receivable163,000
 163,535
Provision for losses on accounts receivable154,576 5,510 
Stock-based compensation748,092
 705,466
Stock-based compensation477,993 634,651 
Fair value of stock and warrants issued or to be issued for payment of services133,897
 177,842
Increase (decrease) in fair value of contingent acquisition costs payable94,000
 (1,834,300)
Loss on exchange of warrants
 1,845,810
Change in fair value of derivatives, net(9,163) 2,133,820
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of business acquired: 
  
Fair value of stock issued for payment of servicesFair value of stock issued for payment of services125,000 141,665 
Gain on settlement of acquisition costs payableGain on settlement of acquisition costs payable(602,410)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Changes in operating assets and liabilities:  
Accounts receivable346,414
 (1,608,561)Accounts receivable234,938 1,469,586 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(115,927) 83,244
Prepaid expenses and other current assets171,620 (87,323)
Security depositsSecurity deposits151,803 (8,629)
Accounts payable443,114
 141,325
Accounts payable(372,392)(365,567)
Accrued expenses17,487
 582,851
Accrued expenses543,768 (466,444)
Unearned revenue(268,964) 1,783,559
Contract liabilitiesContract liabilities713,498 1,508,897 
Right-of-use asset and lease liability, netRight-of-use asset and lease liability, net24,024 (24,024)
Deferred rent(20,490) 896
Deferred rent(17,420)
Net cash used for operating activities(4,719,454) (6,072,958)Net cash used for operating activities(2,095,651)(2,914,114)
   
Cash flows from investing activities:   Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of equipment(122,530) (187,160)Purchase of equipment(19,797)(138,379)
Increase in software development costs(471,219) (452,571)
Acquisition, net of cash acquired(329,468) (1,072,055)
Security deposits(43,790) 1,248
Proceeds from sale of equipmentProceeds from sale of equipment29,183 49,578 
Software development costsSoftware development costs(363,793)(590,549)
Net cash used for investing activities(967,007) (1,710,538)Net cash used for investing activities(354,407)(679,350)
   
Cash flows from financing activities: 
  
Cash flows from financing activities:  
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants, net58,021
 12,937,327
Proceeds from sale of securitiesProceeds from sale of securities28,455,096 10,000,000 
Proceeds from stock purchase plan and option exercise issuancesProceeds from stock purchase plan and option exercise issuances7,634 6,979 
Proceeds from notes payableProceeds from notes payable1,936,522 
Net repayments on line of creditNet repayments on line of credit(1,526,288)
Payments on acquisition liabilitiesPayments on acquisition liabilities(156,111)
Payments on finance obligationPayments on finance obligation(41,219)(26,138)
Stock issuance costs(23,717) (12,933)Stock issuance costs(747,379)(788,752)
Payments on capital lease obligations(7,291) (54,376)
Net cash provided by financing activities27,013
 12,870,018
Net cash provided by financing activities29,610,654 7,509,690 
   
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(5,659,448) 5,086,522
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year11,608,452
 6,521,930
   
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$5,949,004
 $11,608,452
Net increase in cash and cash equivalentsNet increase in cash and cash equivalents27,160,596 3,916,226 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of periodCash and cash equivalents, beginning of period5,884,629 1,968,403 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of periodCash and cash equivalents, end of period$33,045,225 $5,884,629 
   
Supplemental cash flow information: 
  
Supplemental cash flow information:  
Cash paid during the year for interest$68,045
 $6,401
   
Interest paidInterest paid$47,290 $393,584 
Non-cash financing and investing activities: 
  
Non-cash financing and investing activities:  
Fair value of warrants issued$
 $51,950
Acquisition costs payable for assets acquired$
 $3,942,639
Acquisition costs paid through issuance of common stock$1,448,832
 $250,000
Fair value of warrants reclassified from liability to equity$
 $6,530,046
Equipment acquired with financing arrangementEquipment acquired with financing arrangement$43,003 $98,648 
Common stock issued for payment of acquisition liabilityCommon stock issued for payment of acquisition liability$$4,004,397 
Operating right-of-use assetOperating right-of-use asset$$410,852 
Fair value of common stock issued for future servicesFair value of common stock issued for future services$125,000 $192,550 




See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
44

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




NOTE 1.    COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Nature of Business
IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, "we," "us," "our," "IZEA"“we,” “us,” “our,” “IZEA” or the "Company"“Company”) was founded in February 2006 under the name PayPerPost, Inc. and becameis a public company incorporated in the state of Nevada in May 2011.Nevada. In January 2015, IZEA purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Ebyline, Inc. (“Ebyline”) and in July 2016, IZEA purchased all the outstanding shares of capital stock of ZenContent, Inc. ("ZenContent"). Both of these entities, now operate as wholly-owned subsidiaries under IZEA, Inc. OnIn March 9, 2016, the Company formed IZEA Canada, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, incorporated in Ontario, Canada, to operate as a sales and support office for IZEA'sIZEA’s Canadian customers beginningcustomers. In July 2016, IZEA purchased all the outstanding shares of capital stock of ZenContent, Inc. (“ZenContent”) and in the second halfJuly 2018, a subsidiary of 2016. On April 5, 2016, the Company filed Articlesmerged with TapInfluence, Inc. (“TapInfluence”). The legal entity of Merger with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effect the merger of its wholly-owned, non-operating subsidiary, IZEA Innovations, Inc., a Delaware corporation originally incorporated on September 19, 2006, into IZEA, Inc., the Nevada corporation. ZenContent was dissolved in December 2017, Ebyline was dissolved in December 2019 and TapInfluence was dissolved in December 2020.

The Company is headquartered near Orlando, Florida with additional offices in Illinois, Californiacreates and Canada and a sales presence in New York, Michigan and Massachusetts.

The Company operates online marketplaces that facilitate transactions betweenconnect marketers and influentialwith content creators. TheseThe creators are compensated by IZEAthe Company for producing and distributing unique content such as long-formlong and short form text, videos, photos, and status updates, and illustrations for marketers or distributing such content on behalf of marketers through their personal websites, blogs, and social media channels. Marketers receive influential consumer content and engaging, shareable stories that drive awareness. These marketplaces are powered by

The Company’s primary technology platform, the IZEA Exchange (“IZEAx”). The Company's technology, enables transactions to be completed at scale through the management of custom content workflow, creator search and targeting, bidding, analytics, and payment processing. IZEAx is designed to provide a unified ecosystem that enables the creation and publication of multiple types of custom content including blog posts, status updates, videos and photos through a wide variety ofcreator’s personal websites, blogs, or social media channels including blogs, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and Tumblr,YouTube, among others.

Reverse Stock Split
On January 6, Until December 2019 when it was merged into IZEAx, the Company operated the Ebyline technology platform, which was originally designed as a self-service content marketplace to replace in-house editorial newsrooms in news agencies with a “virtual newsroom” to source and handle their content workflow with outside creators. In July 2016, the Company filedacquired the ZenContent technology platform to use as an in-house workflow tool that enables the Company to produce highly scalable, multi-part production of content for both e-commerce entities and brand customers. The TapInfluence technology platform, acquired in 2018, performed in a Certificatesimilar manner to IZEAx and was being utilized by the majority of Amendmentthe TapInfluence customers as a self-service platform via a licensing arrangement, allowing access to the platform and its creators for self-managed marketing campaigns. After the migration of the last customers to IZEAx from the Ebyline platform in December 2019 and from the TapInfluence platform in February 2020, all marketplace revenue was solely generated from the IZEAx platform until the launch of Shake in November 2020.

In 2020, the Company launched two new platforms, BrandGraph and Shake. BrandGraph is a social media intelligence platform that is heavily integrated with IZEAx and both platforms rely heavily on data from each other, but it is also available as a stand-alone platform. The platform maps and classifies the complex hierarchy of corporation-to-brand relationships by category and associates social content with brands through a proprietary content analysis engine. Shake is a new online marketplace where buyers can quickly and easily hire creators of all types for influencer marketing, photography, design, and other digital services. The Shake platform is aimed at digital creatives seeking freelance “gig” work. Creators list available “Shakes” on their accounts in the platform and marketers select and purchase creative packages from them through a streamlined chat experience, assisted by ShakeBot - a proprietary, artificial intelligence assistant.

Impact of COVID-19
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) as a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. As the spread continued throughout the United States, the Company directed all of its staff to work from home effective March 16, 2020. All of the Company’s business operations and ability to support its customers is fully functional while its employees are working from remote locations. However, the Company has seen impacts on its operations due to changes in advertising decisions, timing and spending priorities from customers, which resulted in a negative impact to Company bookings, its net orders from customers, and timing of future revenue. While the disruption caused by COVID-19 is currently expected to be temporary, it is generally outside of the Company’s control and there is uncertainty around the duration and the total economic impact. Therefore, this matter could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial position in future periods. As a result, the Company leveraged its balance sheet by drawing on its secured credit facility and obtaining a loan under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) established under the CARES Act as administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to increase the Company’s cash position and help preserve its financial flexibility. The secured credit facility was paid down by June 30, 2020 after the Company was able to secure additional capital as described in Note 8.

In light of the adverse economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company implemented temporary salary and wage reductions averaging 20%, including a 21% reduction in base salary for the Company’s Chief Executive
45

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Officer and Chief Operating Officer. These salary reductions were effective as of April 6, 2020 until the earlier of December 31, 2020 or the Company’s restoring normal payroll rates to the majority of its employees. Members of the Company’s Board of Directors also agreed to a similar temporary reduction to their fees. In addition to the salary reductions, the Company also temporarily reduced certain employee benefits and implemented a new employee hiring freeze, during the three months ended June 30, 2020. The employee salary reductions and hiring restrictions were removed effective July 1, 2020 after the Company was able to secure additional capital as described in Note 8.

The Company did not renew leases for its headquarters and temporary office spaces as additional means to reduce fixed costs and the Company intends to have all employees work from home for the foreseeable future to protect the health and safety of its workers. There can be no assurance that the Company will return to a typical office environment in the future, nor can the Company say what that office environment may look like. The Company also reduced and shifted marketing expenses and eliminated travel for the near-term future. These measures may not be sustainable and could prove detrimental long term. Therefore, management reviews these initial actions and other options in conjunction with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effect a reverse stock split of the issuedchanging internal and outstanding shares of its common stock at a ratio of one share for every 20 shares outstanding prior to the effective date of the reverse stock split. All current and historical information contained herein related to the share and per share information for the Company's common stock or stock equivalents reflects the 1-for-20 reverse stock split of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock that became market effectiveexternal economic conditions on January 11, 2016. There was no change in the number of the Company's authorized shares of common stock.an ongoing basis.


Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IZEA Worldwide, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Ebyline after itssubsequent to the subsidiaries’ individual acquisition, on January 31, 2015, ZenContent, Inc. after its acquisition on July 31, 2016, and IZEA Canada, Inc. after itsmerger or formation in March 2016.dates, as applicable. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.


Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The extent to which COVID-19 impacts the Company’s business and financial results will depend on numerous evolving factors including, but not limited to: the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, the extent to which it impacts worldwide macroeconomic conditions, the speed of the anticipated recovery, access to capital markets, and governmental and business reactions to the pandemic. The Company assessed certain accounting matters that generally require consideration of forecasted financial information in context with the information reasonably available to the Company and the unknown future impacts of COVID-19 as of December 31, 2020 and through the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accounting matters assessed included, but were not limited to estimates related to revenue, the accounting for potential liabilities and accrued expenses, the assumptions utilized in valuing stock-based compensation issued for services, the realization of deferred tax assets, and assessments of impairment related to long-lived assets, intangible assets, and goodwill. The Company’s future assessment of the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, as well as other factors, could result in additional material impacts to the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared usingin future reporting periods.

Despite the acquisition methodCompany’s efforts, the ultimate impact of accounting with IZEA consideredCOVID-19 depends on factors beyond the accounting acquirerCompany’s knowledge or control, including the duration and severity of Ebylinethe outbreak, as well as third-party actions taken to contain its spread and ZenContent. Undermitigate its public health effects. As a result, the acquisition methodCompany is unable to estimate the full extent to which COVID-19 will negatively impact its financial results or liquidity. However, in consideration of accounting, the purchase price is allocatedeffect of COVID-19 on the assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the December 31, 2020 financial statements, the Company identified the goodwill impairment disclosed in Note 3 as a material adverse effect on its results of operations and financial position in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 that was caused by COVID-19’s effect on economic conditions.

Reclassifications
Certain items have been reclassified in the 2019 financial statements to conform to the underlying tangible2020 presentation. The Company has reclassified its 2019 impairment on intangible assets and software development costs (see Notes 3 and 4) out of general and administrative expense and into a separately stated line item labeled impairment of goodwill and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair market values with any excess purchase price allocatedwithin the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
46

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to goodwill.the Consolidated Financial Statements


Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with aan original maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Deposits in our banks are insured by the FDIC up to a maximum amount of $250,000. Deposit balances exceeding this limit were approximately $31.4 million and $4.1 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
 
Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk
AccountsThe Company’s accounts receivable balance consists of trade receivables, unbilled receivables, and a reserve for doubtful accounts. Trade receivables are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. Unbilled receivables represent amounts owed for work that has been performed, but not yet billed. The Company had trade receivables of $5,148,213 and unbilled receivables of $58,992 at December 31, 2020. The Company had trade receivables of $5,106,314 and unbilled receivables of $490,405 at December 31, 2019. Management considers an account to be delinquent when the customer has not paid an amount due by its associated due date. Uncollectibility of accounts receivable is not significant since most customers are bound by contract and are required to fund the Company for all the costs of an “opportunity,” defined as an order created by a marketer for a creator to write about the marketer’s product.develop or share content on behalf of a marketer. If a portion of the account balance is deemed uncollectible, the Company will either write-off the amount owed or provide a reserve based on its best estimate of the uncollectible portion of the account. Management determines the collectibility of accounts by regularly evaluating individual customer receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit history, and current economic conditions. The Company had a reserve of $237,000 and $139,000 for doubtful accounts of $155,000 and $145,000 as of December 31, 20162020 and 2015,December 31, 2019, respectively. Management believes that this estimate is reasonable, but there can be no assurance that the estimate will not change as a result of a change in economic conditions or business conditions within the industry, the individual customers or the Company. Any adjustments to this account are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as a general and administrative expense. Bad debt expense was less than 1% of revenue for each of the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015.
IZEA, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

2019.
 
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable arehave been typically limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the Company’s customer base, thus spreading the trade credit risk. However, with the Company’s addition of SaaS customers, it has increased credit exposure on certain customers who carry significant credit balances related to their marketplace spend. The Company also controls credit risk through credit approvals, credit limits, and monitoring procedures. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers, but generally does not require collateral to support accounts receivable. At December 31, 2016, theThe Company had no customers which customer that accounted for more than 10% of total accounts receivable. Atreceivable at December 31, 2015, the Company had one customer which accounted for 13% of total accounts receivable.2020 and 2019. The Company had one customer that accounted for 12% of its revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and no customer that accounted for more than 10% of its revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and one customer that accounted for 14% of its revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.2019.


Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost, or if acquired in a business combination, at the acquisition date fair value. Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Computer Equipment3 years
Software Costs3 - 5 years
Office Equipment3 - 10 years
Furniture and Fixtures5 - 10 years


Leasehold improvements are depreciatedamortized over the shorter of the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements. Property and equipment under capital leases are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for betterments and major improvements are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining useful lives of the assets. The carrying amounts of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated in the year of disposal, with resulting gains or losses included in general and administrative expense.expense in the consolidated statements of operations. There were 0 material impairment charges associated with the Company’s long-lived tangible assets during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.


Software Development CostsGoodwill
In accordance with ASC 350-40, Internal Use Software and ASC 985-730, Computer Software Research and Development, research phase costs related to internal use software should be expensed as incurred and development phase costs including direct materials and services, payroll and benefits and interest costs may be capitalized.Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred for an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying identifiable net assets. The Company amortizes software development costs equally over 5 years upon initial launchhas goodwill in connection with its acquisitions of Ebyline, ZenContent and TapInfluence. Goodwill is not amortized but instead it is tested for impairment at least annually. In the event that management
47

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, the Company will record a charge for the amount of impairment during the fiscal quarter in which the determination is made.

The Company performs its annual impairment tests of goodwill as of October 1 of each year, or more frequently, if certain indicators are present. For instance, in March 2020, the Company identified triggering events, including the reduction in its projected revenue due to adverse economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the continuation of a market capitalization below the Company’s carrying value, and uncertainty for recovery given the volatility of the softwarecapital markets surrounding COVID-19. Therefore, the Company performed an interim assessment of goodwill, as described in Note 3. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or additional features.one level below the operating segment level, which is referred to as a component. Management identifies its reporting units by assessing whether components (i) have discrete financial information available; (ii) engage in business activities; and (iii) whether a segment manager regularly reviews the component’s operating results. Net assets and goodwill of acquired businesses are allocated to the reporting unit associated with the acquired business based on the anticipated organizational structure of the combined entities. If two or more components are deemed economically similar, those components are aggregated into one reporting unit when performing the annual goodwill impairment review. The Company had 1 reporting unit as of December 31, 2020.


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). To address concerns over the cost and complexity of the two-step goodwill impairment test, the new standard removes the requirement for the second step of the goodwill impairment test for certain entities. An entity may apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The Company adopted this method in the third quarter of 2019 and there were no changes to its financial statements at the time of the adoption.

Intangible Assets
The Company acquired the majority of its intangible assets through its acquisitionacquisitions of Ebyline, on January 30, 2015ZenContent, and its acquisition of ZenContent on July 31, 2016.TapInfluence. The Company is amortizing the identifiable intangible assets over a periodperiods of 12 to 60 months. See Note 3 for further details.

Management reviews long-lived assets, including property and equipment, software development costs and other intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If an evaluation is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are compared with the asset's carrying amount to determine if there has been an impairment, which is calculated as the difference between the fair value of anthe asset and itsthe carrying value. Estimates of future undiscounted cash flows are based on expected growth rates for the business, anticipated future economic conditions and estimates of residual values. Fair values take into consideration management estimates of risk-adjusted discount rates, which are believed to be consistent with assumptions that marketplace participants would use in their estimates of fair value. For the twelve months ended December 31, 20162019, the Company recorded impairment charges of $418,099 associated with the Company's reduction in use of certain developed technology upon implementation of IZEAx 3.0 and 2015, therethe migration of TapInfluence customers and creators into the IZEAx platform. There were no0 impairment charges associated with the Company's long-lived assets.Company’s acquired intangible assets in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020.


GoodwillSoftware Development Costs
Goodwill representsIn accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350-40, Internal Use Software, the Company capitalizes certain internal use software development costs associated with creating and enhancing internally developed software related to its platforms. Software development activities generally consist of three stages (i) the research and planning stage, (ii) the application and development stage, and (iii) the post-implementation stage. Costs incurred in the research and planning stage and in the post-implementation stage of software development, or other maintenance and development expenses that do not meet the qualification for capitalization, are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in the application and infrastructure development stage, including significant enhancements and upgrades, are capitalized. These costs include personnel and related employee benefits expenses for employees or consultants who are directly associated with and who devote time to software projects, and external direct costs of materials obtained in developing the software. The Company also capitalizes certain costs associated with cloud computing arrangements ("CCAs"). These software development, acquired technology, and CCA costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of five years upon initial release of the software or additional features. The Company reviews the software development costs for impairment when circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the carrying value of an asset group is not recoverable, the Company recognizes an impairment loss for the excess of the purchase consideration of an acquired businesscarrying value over the fair value in its consolidated statements of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. The Company has goodwill that has been recorded in connection with its acquisition of Ebyline and ZenContent. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead it is testedoperations. See Note 4 for impairment at least annually. In the event that management determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, the Company will record a charge for the amount of impairment during the fiscal quarter in which the determination is made.

The Company performs its annual impairment tests of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently, if certain indicators are present. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below the operating segment level, which is referred to as a component. Management identifies its reporting units by assessing whether components (i) have discrete financial information available; (ii) engage in business activities; and (iii) whether a segment manager regularly reviews the component's operating results. Net assets and goodwill of acquired businesses are allocated to the reporting unit associated with the acquired business based on the anticipated organizational structure of thefurther details.
48

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements



combined entities. If twoLeases
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which established a right-of-use model that requires a lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a right-of-use liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases are classified as either finance or more components are deemed economically similar, those components are aggregated into one reporting unit when performingoperating, with classification affecting the annual goodwill impairment review.pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The Company has determineddoes not record leases on the balance sheet that prior to and afterhave a lease term of 12 months or less at the acquisition of Ebyline and ZenContent, it had and continues to have one reporting unit.commencement date.


Revenue Recognition
The Company derives itshistorically generated revenue from threefive primary sources: (1) revenue from its managed services when a marketer when it(typically a brand, agency or partner) pays the Company to provide custom content, influencer marketing, amplification or other campaign management services (“Managed Services”); (2) revenue from fees charged to software customers on their marketplace spend within the Company's IZEAx, Shake, and TapInfluence platforms (“Marketplace Spend Fees”); (3) revenue from fees charged to access the IZEAx, BrandGraph, Ebyline, and TapInfluence platforms (“License Fees”); (4) revenue from transactions generated by the self-service use of the Company's Ebyline platform for a social media publisher or influencer such as a blogger or tweeter ("creators") to share sponsoredprofessional custom content with their social network audience ("Sponsored Revenue"workflow (“Legacy Workflow Fees”), revenue when a publisher or company purchases custom branded content for its own use, as well as third party content marketing; and native advertising efforts ("Content Revenue") and(5) revenue derived from various serviceother fees such as inactivity fees, early cash-out fees, and licensesubscription plan fees charged to users of the Company's platforms ("Service Fee Revenue"(“Other”). After the migration of the last customers from the Ebyline platform to IZEAx in December 2019, there is 0 longer any revenue generated from Legacy Workflow Fees and all such revenue is reported as Marketplace Spend Fees under the IZEAx platform.


For managedThe Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized based on a five-step model as follows: (i) identify the contract with the customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied. The core principle of ASC 606 is that revenue is recognized when the transfer of promised goods or services to customers is made in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that it will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company enters intoassesses the goods or services promised within each contract and determines those that are distinct performance obligations. The Company also determines whether it acts as an agreementagent or a principal for each identified performance obligation. The determination of whether the Company acts as the principal or the agent is highly subjective and requires the Company to provideevaluate a number of indicators individually and as a whole in order to make its determination. For transactions in which the Company acts as a principal, revenue is reported on a gross basis as the amount paid by the marketer for the purchase of content or sponsorship, promotion and other related services that may require multiple deliverablesand the Company records the amounts it pays to third-party creators as cost of revenue. For transactions in which the Company acts as an agent, revenue is reported on a net basis as the amount the Company charged to the self-service marketer using the Company’s platforms, less the amounts paid to the third-party creators providing the service.

The Company maintains separate arrangements with each marketer and content creator either in the form of (a) sponsored social items, such as blogs, tweets, photosa master agreement or videos shared through social network offerings that provide awarenessterms of service, which specify the terms of the relationship and access to its platforms, or advertising buzz regarding the marketer's brand; (b) media advertisements, such as click-through advertisements appearing in websites and social media channels; and (c) original content items, such as a research or news article, informational material or videos that a publisher or marketer can use. The Company may provide one type or a combination of all types of these deliverables including a management fee on aby statement of work, for a lump sum fee. These deliverables arewhich specifies the price and the services to be provided over aperformed, along with other terms. The transaction price is determined based on the fixed fee stated period that may range from one dayin the statement of work and does not contain variable consideration. Marketers who contract with the Company to one year. Each of these items are considered delivered once the content is live through a public or social networkmanage their advertising campaigns or custom content has been delivered torequests may prepay for services or request credit terms. Payment terms are typically 30 days from the customer for their own use. Revenue is accounted for separately on each of the deliverables in the time frames set forth below.invoice date. The statement of workagreement typically provides for either a non-refundable deposit, or a cancellation fee if the agreement is canceled by the customer prior to completion of services. Payment termsBillings in advance of completed services are recorded as a contract liability until earned. The Company assesses collectibility based on a number of factors, including the creditworthiness of the customer and payment and transaction history.
Managed Services Revenue
For Managed Services Revenue, the Company enters into an agreement to provide services that may include multiple distinct performance obligations in the form of: (i) an integrated marketing campaign to provide influencer marketing services, which may include the provision of blogs, tweets, photos or videos shared through social network offerings and content promotion, such as click-through advertisements appearing in websites and social media channels; and (ii) custom content items, such as a research or news article, informational material or videos. Marketers typically 30 dayspurchase influencer marketing services for the purpose of providing public awareness or advertising buzz regarding the marketer’s brand and they purchase custom content for internal and external use. The Company may provide one type or a combination of all types of these performance obligations on a statement of work for a lump sum fee. The Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation in the contract at inception based on its relative standalone selling price. These performance obligations are to be
49

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

provided over a stated period that generally ranges from one day to one year. Revenue is accounted for when the performance obligation has been satisfied depending on the type of service provided. The Company views its obligation to deliver influencer marketing services, including management services, as a single performance obligation that is satisfied over time as the customer receives the benefits from the invoice date. Ifservices. Revenue is recognized using an input method of costs incurred compared to total expected costs to measure the progress towards satisfying the overall performance obligation of the marketing campaign. The delivery of custom content represents a distinct performance obligation that is satisfied over time as the Company has no alternative for the custom content, and the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date under the contracts. The Company considers custom content to be a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer, and revenue is recognized over time using an output method based on when each individual piece of content is delivered to the customer. Based on the Company’s evaluations, revenue from Managed Services is reported on a gross basis because the Company has the primary obligation to fulfill the performance obligations and it creates, reviews, and controls the services. The Company takes on the risk of payment to any third-party creators, and it establishes the contract price directly with its customers based on the services requested in the statement of work.
Marketplace Spend Fees and Legacy Workflow Fees Revenue
For Marketplace Spend Fees and Legacy Workflow Fees Revenue, the self-service customer instructs creators found through the Company’s platforms to provide and/or distribute custom content for an agreed upon transaction price. The Company’s platforms control the contracting, description of services, acceptance of and payment for the requested content. This service is used primarily by news agencies or marketers to control the outsourcing of their content and advertising needs. The Company charges the self-service customer the transaction price plus a fee based on the contract. Revenue is recognized when the transaction is completed by the creator and accepted by the marketer or verified as posted by the system. Based on the Company’s evaluations, this revenue is reported on a net basis since the Company is unableacting as an agent solely arranging for the third-party creator or influencer to provide a portionthe services directly to the self-service customer through the platform or by posting the requested content.
License Fees Revenue
License Fees Revenue is generated through the granting of limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable licenses to customers for the use of the services, it may agree withIZEAx, BrandGraph, and until February 2020, the customerTapInfluence technology platforms for an agreed-upon subscription period. Customers license the platforms to provide a different type of servicemanage their own influencer marketing campaigns. Fees for subscription or to provide a credit for the value of thoselicensing services that may be applied to the existing order or used for future services.

Sponsored Revenue is recognized and considered earned after a marketer's sponsored content is posted through IZEAx and shared through a creator's social network for a requisite period of time. The requisite period ranges from 3 days for a tweet to 30 days for a blog, video or other form of content. Management fees related to Sponsored Revenue from advertising campaigns managed by the Company are recognized ratablystraight-line over the term of the campaign which may range from a few days to several months. Contentservice.
Other Fees Revenue is recognized when the content is delivered to and accepted by the customer. Service Fee
Other Fees Revenue is generated when fees are charged to customersthe Company’s platform users primarily related to subscriptionmonthly plan fees, for different levels of serviceinactivity fees, and early cash-out fees. Plan fees are recognized within the month they relate to, inactivity fees are recognized at a platform, licensing fees for white-label use of IZEAx,point in time when the account is deemed inactive, and early cash-out fees ifare recognized when a creator wishes to take proceeds earned for services from their account when the account balancecash-out is either below certain minimum balance thresholds and inactivity fees for dormant accounts. Service Fee Revenueor when accelerated payout timing is recognized immediately when the service is performed or at the time an account becomes dormant or is cashed out. Service Fee Revenue for subscription or licensing fees is recognized straight-line over the term of service. Self-service marketers must prepay for services by placing a depositrequested.
The Company does not typically engage in their account with the Company. The depositscontracts that are typically paid by the marketer via credit card. Marketers who uselonger than one year. Therefore, the Company does not capitalize costs to manage their social advertising campaigns or custom content requests may prepay for services or request credit terms. Payments received or billings in advance of services are recordedobtain its customer contracts as unearned revenue until earned as described above.

All of the Company's revenue is generated through the rendering of services and is recognized under the general guidelines of SAB Topic 13 A.1, which states that revenue willthese amounts generally would be recognized when it is realized or realizableover a period of less than one year and earned. The Company considers its revenue as generally realized or realizable and earned once (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) services have been rendered, (iii) the price to the marketer or customer is fixed (required to be paid at a set amount that isare not subject to refund or adjustment) and determinable, and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. The Company records revenue on the gross amount earned since it generally is the primary obligor in the arrangement, takes on credit risk, establishes the pricing and determines the service specifications.material.


Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are charged to expense as they are incurred, including payments to content creators to promote the Company. Advertising expensecosts charged to operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 20152019 were approximately $455,000 and $558,000, respectively.$749,000 in each year. Advertising costs are included in sales and marketing expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Deferred Rent
The Company’s operating leases for its office facilities contain rent abatements and predetermined fixed increases of the base rental rate during the lease term. The Company accounts for rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The
IZEA, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Company records the difference between the straight-line expense and the actual amounts paid under the lease as deferred rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.


Income Taxes
The Company has not recorded federal income tax expense due to the generationits history of net operating losses. Deferred income taxes are accounted for using the balance sheet approach, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company incurs minimal state franchise tax in twofour states, which is included in general and administrative expensesexpense in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
The Company identifies and evaluates uncertain tax positions, if any, and recognizes the impact of uncertain tax positions for which there is a less than more-likely-than-not probability of the position being upheld when reviewed by the
50

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

relevant taxing authority. Such positions are deemed to be unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding liability is established on the balance sheet. The Company has not recognized a liability for uncertain tax positions. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. The Company’s tax years subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service are 2013, 20142016 through 2019.

In March 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law. The CARES Act, among other things, includes provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of employer side social security payments, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, modifications to the net interest deduction limitations, increased limitations on qualified charitable contributions, and 2015.

Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instrumentstechnical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property. It also appropriated funds for the PPP loans that are definedforgivable in certain situations to promote continued employment, as financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying factors (e.g., interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recordedwell as liabilities or assets.Economic Injury Disaster Loans to provide liquidity to small businesses harmed by COVID-19. The Company accounts for derivative instrumentsis currently seeking forgiveness of its PPP loan which, if approved, would result in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”), which requires additional disclosures about the Company’s objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and how the derivative instruments and related hedging items affect the financial statements. The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risk. Terms of equity instruments are reviewed to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under ASC 815 to be accounted for separately from the host contract, and recordednon-taxable income on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair valueforgiveness of derivative liabilities, if any, is required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in current period operating results. Pursuant to ASC 815, an evaluation of specifically identified conditions is made to determine whether the fair value of warrants issued is required to be classified as equity or as a derivative liability.debt.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments are recorded at fair value. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect certain market assumptions. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
 
Level 1 Valuation based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 Valuation based on quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets.
Level 3 Valuation based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring management’s best estimate of what market participants would use as fair value.
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management. The Company does not have any Level 1, 2 or 23 financial assets or liabilities. The Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities measured at fair value consisted of its acquisition cost liability (see Note 2) and a warrant liability (see Note 6) as of December 31, 2016. Significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the warrants include the estimated term and risk-adjusted interest rates. In developing its credit risk assumption used in the fair value of warrants, the Company considered publicly available bond rates and US Treasury Yields. However, since the Company does not have a formal credit-standing, management estimated its standing among various reported levels and grades for use in the model. During all periods, management estimated that the Company's standing was in the speculative to high-risk grades (BB- to CCC in the Standard and Poor's Rating). Significant increases or decreases in the estimated remaining period to exercise or the risk-adjusted interest rate could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.

IZEA, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The respective carrying valuevalues of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, unearned revenuecontract liabilities, and accrued expenses. Unless otherwise disclosed, the fair valuevalues of the Company’s capital leaselong-term debt obligations approximate their carrying value based upon current rates available to the Company.


Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost related to stock options granted under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and the 2011 B Equity Incentive Plan (together, the "2011“2011 Equity Incentive Plans"Plans”) (see Note 8) is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as a straight-lined expense over the employee’s requisite service period.period on a straight-line basis. The Company estimates the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. The Company estimatesuses the fair valuesimplified method to estimate the expected term of its commonemployee stock usingoptions, because it does not believe historical exercise data will provide a reasonable basis for estimating the expected term for the current share options granted. The simplified method assumes that employees will exercise share options evenly between the period when the share options are vested and ending on the date when the options would expire. The Company uses the closing stock price of its common stock on the date of the option award. Thegrant as the associated fair value of its common stock. For issuances after June 30, 2019, the Company estimates the volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the volatility of its stock during the period. For issuances on or prior to June 30, 2019, the Company estimated the volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the volatility of comparable peer companies that arewere publicly traded and have had a longer trading history than itself.the Company. The Company determines the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and post-vesting forfeitures. The Company uses the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term approximately equal to the expected life of the award. The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company used the following assumptions for stock options granted under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plans during the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015:2019:
51

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 Twelve Months EndedTwelve Months Ended
2011 Equity Incentive Plans Assumptions December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
2011 Equity Incentive Plans AssumptionsDecember 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Expected term 6 years 6 yearsExpected term6 years6 years
Weighted average volatility 47.95% 55.47%Weighted average volatility108.58%64.38%
Weighted average risk free interest rate 1.58% 1.65%
Weighted average risk-free interest rateWeighted average risk-free interest rate0.46%1.92%
Expected dividends  Expected dividends00
Weighted average expected forfeiture rateWeighted average expected forfeiture rate7.72%9.26%


The Company estimates forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and this estimate of forfeitures is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change, and a revised amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods. Average expected forfeiture rates were 9.52% and 8.32% during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


Non-Employee Stock-Based Payments
The Company's accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisionsCompany may issue shares of ASC 505, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees.”restricted stock or restricted stock units which vest over future periods. The measurement date forvalue of shares is recorded as the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined atstock or units upon the earlier of (i) theissuance date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor's performance is complete. The fair value of equity instruments issued to consultants that vest immediatelyand is expensed when issued. The fair value of equity instruments issued to consultants that have future vesting and are subject to forfeiture if performance does not occur is recognized as expenseon a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Fair valuesSee Note 8 for the unvested portion of issued instruments are adjusted each reporting period. The change in fair value is recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Stock-based paymentsadditional information related to non-employees is accounted for based on the fair value of the related stock or the fair value of the services, whichever is more readily determinable.these shares.


Segment Information
The Company does not identify separate operating segments for management reporting purposes. The results of consolidated operations are the basis on which management evaluates operations and makes business decisions.

Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
RecentRecently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurements:In June 2014,August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”). The new guidance that appliesamends the disclosure requirements for recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements by removing, modifying, and adding certain disclosures on fair value measurements in ASC 820. The amendments on changes to the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied retrospectively to all reporting entitiesperiods presented upon their effective date. The adoption of ASU 2018-13 on January 1, 2020 was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Collaborative Arrangements: In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Clarifying the interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606 (“ASU 2018-18”). The guidance makes targeted improvements to GAAP for collaborative arrangements including: (i) clarifying that grant their employees share-based paymentscertain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants should be accounted for as revenue under ASC 606 when the collaborative arrangement participant is a customer in which the termscontext of a unit of account, (ii) adding unit-of-account guidance in ASC 808 to align with the guidance in ASC 606 (that is, a distinct good or service) when an entity is assessing whether the collaborative arrangement or a part of the award providearrangement is within the scope of ASC 606, and (iii) requiring that in a performance targettransaction with a collaborative arrangement participant that affects vesting couldis not directly related to sales to third parties, presenting the transaction together with revenue recognized under ASC 606 is precluded if the collaborative arrangement participant is not a customer. The amendments in this update are effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to the date of initial application of ASC 606. An entity may elect to apply the practical expedient for contract modifications that is permitted for entities using the modified retrospective transition method in ASC 606. The Company adopted ASU 2018-18 on January 1, 2020 and applied the amendments only to contracts that were not completed as of such date. The adoption of ASU 2018-18 was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement: On January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU No. 2018-15 ("ASU 2018-15"), Customer's Accounting Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract, which requires a customer in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract to follow the internal-use software guidance in Accounting Standards Codification 350-40 to determine which implementation costs to defer and recognize as an asset. ASU 2018-15 generally aligns the guidance on recognizing implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract with that for implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software, including hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license. This ASU was adopted using the retrospective approach. The adoption of ASU 2018-15 was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

52

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
be achieved after the requisite service period. It requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition and follows existing accounting guidance for the treatment of performance conditions. This update was effective January 1, 2016 and the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

Credit Losses: In August 2014, the FASB issued guidance about disclosing an entity's ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance is intended to define management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This update was effective December 15, 2016 and the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued guidance to simplify the accounting for measurement-period adjustments for an acquirer in a business combination. The update requires an acquirer to recognize any adjustments to provisional amounts of the initial accounting for a business combination with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined in the measurement period, as opposed to revising prior periods presented in financial statements. Thus, an acquirer shall adjust its financial statements as needed, including recognizing in its current-period earnings the full effect of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, by line item, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. This update was effective January 1, 2016 and the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures).

In MarchJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology under current GAAP with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). Thea methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires a consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. ASU 2016-13 requires use of a forward-looking expected credit loss model for accounts receivables, loans, and other financial instruments. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, which provides transition relief for entities adopting ASU 2016-13. For entities that have adopted ASU 2016-13, the amendments in this ASU 2019-05 are intended to improveeffective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods therein. An entity may early adopt the understanding ofASU in any interim period after its issuance if the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations by amending certain existing illustrative examples and adding additional illustrative examples to assist inentity has adopted ASU 2016-13. For all other entities, the application of the guidance. The effective date and transition of these amendments iswill be the same as the effective date and transition of ASU 2014-09 stated above.
In April 2016, the FASB issued2016-13. ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. ASU 2016-10 is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the guidance in the FASB's new revenue standard on identifying performance obligations, and is also intended to improve the understanding of the licensing implementation guidance. The effective date for ASU 2016-10 is the same as for ASU 2014-09 stated above.

These new revenue recognition standards will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018, with the option to adopt it in the first quarter of 2017. The Company currently anticipates adopting the new standard effective January 1, 2018. The new standard permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective method). The Company currently anticipates adopting the standard using the modified retrospective method. The Company is reviewing each of the five steps in the new revenue recognition model, which are as follows: 1) Identify the contract with the customer; 2) Identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3) Determine the transaction price; 4) Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and 5) Recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied. However, the Company has not yet finalized its review and analysis to determine the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approachThe Company is requiredcurrently evaluating the expected impact of adopting ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

Income Taxes:In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for lesseesIncome Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for capitalincome taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and operating leasesalso clarifies and amends existing at,guidance to improve consistent application. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company believes this guidance will not have a material impact on its financial statements.

Investments - Equity Securities: In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-01, Investments - Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, 323 and Topic 815 (“ASU 2020-01”) to clarify the scope and interaction between these standards for equity securities, equity method and certain derivatives. ASU 2020-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company believes this guidance will not have a material impact on its financial statements.

Reference Rate Reform: In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”). ASU 2020-04 provides optional guidance for a limited time to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. It also provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. ASU 2020-04 applies only to contracts and hedging relationships that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform. ASU 2020-04 is effective immediately and may be applied prospectively to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into after,or evaluated on or before December 31, 2022. The Company believes this guidance will not have a material impact on its financial statements.

Convertible Instruments:In August 2020, the beginningFASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06”). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the guidance on the issuer’s accounting for convertible debt instruments by removing the separation models for (1) convertible debt with a cash conversion feature and (2) convertible instruments with a beneficial conversion feature. As a result, entities will not separately present in equity an embedded conversion feature in such debt. Instead, they will account for a convertible debt instrument wholly as debt, unless certain other conditions are met. The elimination of these models will reduce reported interest expense and increase reported net income for entities that have issued a convertible instrument that was within the scope of those models before the adoption of ASU 2020-06. Also, ASU 2020-06 requires the application of the earliest comparative period presented inif-converted method for calculating diluted earnings per share and the treasury stock method will be no longer available. The provisions of ASU 2020-06 are applicable for the Company as a smaller reporting company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, with early adoption permitted no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2020-06 on its consolidated financial statements with certain practicaland related disclosures.
IZEA, Inc.
NotesCodification Improvements: In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-08, Codification Improvements to the Consolidated Financial Statements

expedients available.Subtopic 310-20, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs ("ASU 2020-08"), and ASU No. 2020-10, Codification Improvements ("ASU 2020-10"). ASU 2020-08 and ASU 2020-10 provide changes to clarify or improve existing guidance. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU 2020-08 and ASU 2020-10 will have on its consolidated financial statements.statements and disclosures.



NOTE 2.     BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

EBYLINE, INC.
On January 30, 2015, the Company purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Ebyline pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2015, by and among IZEA, Ebyline and the stockholders of Ebyline for a maximum purchase price to be paid over the next three years of $8,850,000. Based in Los Angeles, California, Ebyline operates an online marketplace that enables publishers to access a network of over 15,000 content creators ranging from writers to illustrators in 84 countries. Over 2,000 fully vetted individuals in the Ebyline network have professional journalism credentials with backgrounds at well-known media outlets. Ebyline’s proprietary workflow is utilized by leading media organizations to obtain the content they need from professional content creators. In addition to publishers, Ebyline is leveraged by marketers to produce custom branded content for use on their owned and operated sites, as well as third party content marketing and native advertising efforts.
Purchase Price and Acquisition Costs Payable
53
 Estimated Gross Purchase ConsiderationInitial Present and Fair ValueRemaining Present and Fair ValueRemaining Present and Fair Value
 1/30/20151/30/201512/31/201512/31/2016
Cash paid at closing$1,200,000
$1,200,000
$
$
Guaranteed purchase price (a)2,127,064
1,982,639
1,823,711
934,728
Contingent performance payments (b)2,210,000
1,834,300


Acquisition costs payable by Ebyline shareholders (c)

(89,700)
Total estimated consideration$5,537,064
$5,016,939
$1,734,011
$934,728
     
Current portion of acquisition costs payable  $844,931
$934,728
Long term portion of acquisition costs payable  889,080

Total acquisition costs payable  $1,734,011
$934,728

(a)The January 2015 Ebyline Stock Purchase Agreement required a $1,200,000 cash payment at closing, a $250,000 stock payment on July 30, 2015 and a cash or stock payment of up to an additional $1,900,000 (subject to proportional reduction in the event Ebyline’s final 2014 revenue was below $8,000,000). Ebyline's final gross revenue for 2014 was $7,903,429. As such, the additional amount owed became $1,877,064 payable in two equal installments of $938,532 on January 30, 2016 and January 30, 2017. This guaranteed purchase price consideration was discounted to present value using the Company's borrowing rate of prime plus 2% . Interest expense imputed on the acquisition costs payable in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations was $49,549 and $91,072 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Per the January 2015 Ebyline Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 31,821 shares of its common stock valued at $250,000 to satisfy a portion of the guaranteed purchase price payment obligation on July 30, 2015. On January 29, 2016, the Company issued 114,398 shares of its common stock valued at $848,832 to satisfy the annual guaranteed payment of $938,532 less $89,700 in closing related expenses (see item (c) below).

(b)Total contingent performance payments up to $5,500,000 are to be paid based on Ebyline meeting certain revenue targets. The performance payments are to be made only if Ebyline achieves at least 90% of Content Revenue targets of $17,000,000 in 2015, $27,000,000 in 2016 and $32,000,000 in 2017. The fair value of the $5,500,000 of contingent performance payments was calculated using a Monte-Carlo simulation to simulate revenue over the next three years. Since the contingent consideration has an option like structure, a risk-neutral framework is considered appropriate for the valuation. The Company started with a risk-adjusted measure of forecasted revenue (using a risk-adjusted discount rate of 8.5%) and assumed it will follow geometric brownian motion to simulate the revenue at future dates. Once the initial revenue was estimated based off of projections made during the acquisition, payout was calculated for each year and present valued to incorporate the credit risk associated with these payments. The Company's initial value conclusion was based on the average payment from 100,000 simulation trials. The volatility used for the

IZEA, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

simulation was 35%. The Monte Carlo simulation resulted in a calculated fair value of contingent performance payments of $2,210,000 on January 30, 2015. Because the contingent performance payments are subject to a 17% reduction related to the continued employment of certain key employees, ASC 805-10-55-25 indicates that a portion of these payments be treated as potential compensation to be accrued over the term rather than allocated to the purchase price. Therefore, the Company reduced its overall purchase price consideration by $357,700 and recorded the initial present value of the contingent performance payments at $1,834,300. Based on actual results for and projections for Content Revenue for 2015-2017, the Content Revenue for every year is expected to be below 90% of the required Content Revenues targets. Therefore, the Company reduced the fair value of contingent performance payments to zero by the end of 2015. The decrease in the estimated fair value of contingent performance payments was recorded as a reduction of general and administrative expense in the Company's consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2015.

(c)According to the January 2015 Ebyline Stock Purchase Agreement, $89,700 in closing related expenses paid by Ebyline during the acquisition process were payable by the selling shareholders. These costs were deducted from the guaranteed payment on January 30, 2016.

Purchase Price Allocation
The final allocation of the purchase price as of January 30, 2015 is summarized as follows:
 Final Purchase Price Allocation
Current assets$738,279
Property and equipment27,194
Identifiable intangible assets2,370,000
Goodwill2,468,289
Security deposits18,553
Current liabilities(605,376)
Total estimated consideration$5,016,939

There are many synergies between the business operations of Ebyline and IZEA including a database of creators that can provide custom content and advertising and synergies between our online marketplaces that appeal to customers on both sides. The Ebyline operations are included in the consolidated financial statements beginning on the date of acquisition of January 30, 2015. The Ebyline operations contributed revenue of $9,313,409 and gross profit of $2,109,228 in the consolidated statement of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and revenue of $8,001,882 and gross profit of $942,089 in the consolidated statement of operations during the eleven months from January 31, 2015 through December 31, 2015.

The following unaudited pro forma summary presents consolidated information of IZEA, Inc. as if the business combination with Ebyline had occurred on January 1, 2014:
 Pro-Forma
 Twelve Months Ended
 12/31/2015
Pro-Forma Revenue$21,178,040
Pro-Forma Cost of Sales12,887,062
Pro-Forma Gross Profit8,290,978
Pro-Forma Net Loss(11,398,336)

IZEA did not have any material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The pro forma revenue and earnings calculations have been calculated after applying the Company's accounting policies on revenue recognition and adjusting the results to reflect the additional depreciation and amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments to property and equipment and intangible assets had been applied from January 1, 2014. The Company incurred $87,906 in acquisition-related costs which are included in general and administrative expense on the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. These costs are reflected in pro forma earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

IZEA, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements



ZENCONTENT, INC.
On July 31, 2016, the Company purchased all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of ZenContent pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement, by and among IZEA, ZenContent and the stockholders of ZenContent for a maximum purchase price to be paid over the next three years of $4,500,000. Based in Mountain View, California, ZenContent offers a custom content marketing technology platform that creates high volume original content for businesses. ZenContent services a strong base of Fortune 500 e-commerce customers, amongst others. ZenContent customers have access to its network of more than 5,000 content creators for large-scale asset production. ZenContent’s proprietary tools ingest full product databases, source creators and provide quality assurance for custom content projects, making product listings friendlier for consumers and more indexable for search. Outside of e-commerce, ZenContent also works with leading online publishers for the production of articles and text updates, including a real-time application program interface that enables production of assets for rapid publishing of news stories and augmentation of consumer content.

Purchase Price and Acquisition Costs Payable
 Estimated Gross Purchase ConsiderationInitial Present and Fair ValueRemaining Present and Fair Value
 7/31/20167/31/201612/31/2016
Cash paid at closing (a)$400,000
$400,000
$
Stock paid at closing (a)600,000
600,000

Guaranteed purchase price (b)933,565
566,547
682,348
Contingent performance payments (c)2,500,000
230,000
324,000
Total estimated consideration$4,433,565
$1,796,547
$1,006,348
    
Current portion of acquisition costs payable  $318,157
Long term portion of acquisition costs payable  688,191
Total acquisition costs payable  $1,006,348


(a)The aggregate consideration paid at closing for the acquisition of ZenContent consisted of (a) a cash payment of $400,000 and (b) the issuance of 86,207 shares of IZEA common stock valued at $600,000 (using the 30 trading-day volume-weighted average closing price of IZEA's common stock of $6.96 per share as of July 29, 2016).

(b)Aggregate future consideration consists of (i) three equal annual installment payments totaling $1,000,000, commencing 12 months following the closing, less a reduction of $66,435 due to a customary closing date working capital adjustment ("guaranteed purchase price"), and (ii) contingent performance payments of up to an aggregate of $2,500,000 over the three 12-month periods following the closing. These payments are also subject to downward adjustment of up to 30% if Brianna DeMike, ZenContent’s co-founder, is terminated by IZEA for cause or she terminates her employment without good reason. As a result, the Company initially reduced its acquisition cost liability by $300,000 to be accrued as compensation expense over the three-year term rather than allocated to the purchase price in accordance with ASC 805-10-55-25. Compensation expense added to the acquisition costs payable and recorded as general and administrative expense in the Company's consolidated statement of operations was $102,431 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. The initial guaranteed purchase price consideration was discounted to present value using the Company's borrowing rate of prime plus 2% (5.5%). Interest expense imputed on the acquisition costs payable in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations was $13,370 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.

(c)The contingent performance payments are subject to ZenContent achieving certain minimum revenue thresholds over 36 months. ZenContent is required to meet minimum revenues of $2.5 million, $3.5 million and $4.5 million in the first, second and third, respective 12-month periods following the closing in order to receive any portion of the contingent performance payments. Of these payments, 33% of each such annual installment or contingent performance payment will be in the form of cash and the remainder of such payment will be in the form of either cash or additional shares of IZEA common stock at then average stock prices (determined at IZEA’s option). The
IZEA, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

$230,000 fair value of the contingent performance payments was calculated using a Monte-Carlo simulation to simulate revenue over the next three years. Since the contingent consideration has an option like structure, a risk-neutral framework is considered appropriate for the valuation. The Company started with a risk-adjusted measure of forecasted revenue (using a risk-adjusted discount rate of 16.0%) and assumed it will follow geometric brownian motion to simulate the revenue at future dates. Once the initial revenue was estimated based off of projections made during the acquisition, payout was calculated for each year and present valued to incorporate the credit risk associated with these payments. The Company's initial value conclusion was based on the average payment from 250,000 simulation trials. The volatility used for the simulation was 60%. The interest rate used for the simulation was the Company's current borrowing rate of prime plus 2% (5.75%). The Company revalued its estimate of the contingent performance payment as of December 31, 2016 based on actual results for and projections for Content Revenue from ZenContent and determined that current fair value was $324,000. Therefore, the increase in the estimated fair value of contingent performance payable resulted in an increase to general and administrative expense in the Company's consolidated statement of operations during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.

Purchase Price Allocation
The consolidated financial statements reflect the allocation of the purchase price to the underlying ZenContent tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair market values with any excess purchase price allocated to goodwill.

The allocation of the purchase price as of July 31, 2016 is summarized as follows:
 Final Purchase Price Allocation
Current assets$415,798
Property and equipment4,551
Identifiable intangible assets722,000
Goodwill1,136,431
Current liabilities(482,233)
Total estimated consideration$1,796,547

There are many synergies between the business operations of ZenContent and IZEA including a database of creators that can provide custom content and advertising and synergies between our online marketplaces that appeal to customers on both sides. The ZenContent operations are included in the consolidated financial statements beginning on the date of acquisition of July 31, 2016. The ZenContent operations contributed revenue of $936,194 and gross profit of $436,395 in the consolidated statement of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. The Company incurred $52,665 in acquisition-related costs which are included in general and administrative expense on the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.


NOTE 3.2.     PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consistsconsist of the following:
December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Furniture and fixtures$254,206
 $252,516
Furniture and fixtures$221,733 $298,205 
Office equipment65,463
 53,265
Office equipment67,833 86,884 
Computer equipment432,321
 421,798
Computer equipment513,344 455,008 
Leasehold improvements324,716
 314,400
Leasehold improvements338,018 
Total1,076,706
 1,041,979
Total802,910 1,178,115 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(616,056) (445,971)Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(571,992)(868,335)
Property and equipment, net$460,650
 $596,008
Property and equipment, net$230,918 $309,780 


Computer equipment includes items under capital leases totaling $59,458 as of December 31, 2015. AccumulatedDepreciation and amortization relating to equipment under capital leases totaled $37,341 as of December 31, 2015. Depreciation expense on property and equipment recorded in generaldepreciation and administrativeamortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations was $253,004$135,077 and $206,670$131,121 for the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively.
IZEA, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




NOTE 4.3.     INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

The identifiable intangible assets, other than Goodwill, consists of the following assets:    
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
BalanceAccumulated AmortizationBalanceAccumulated AmortizationUseful Life (in years)
Content provider networks$160,000 $160,000 $160,000 $160,000 2
Trade names87,000 87,000 87,000 87,000 1
Developed technology820,000 820,000 820,000 622,167 5
Self-service content customers2,810,000 2,304,444 2,810,000 1,437,778 3
Managed content customers2,140,000 2,140,000 2,140,000 2,140,000 3
Domains166,469 166,469 166,469 133,175 5
Embedded non-compete provision28,000 28,000 28,000 19,833 2
Total$6,211,469 $5,705,913 $6,211,469 $4,599,953 
 BalanceAccumulated Amortization BalanceAccumulated AmortizationUseful Life (in years)
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Content provider networks$160,000
$57,083
 $30,000
$27,500
1
Trade names52,000
45,000
 40,000
36,667
1
Developed technology530,000
134,167
 300,000
55,000
3
Self-service content customers210,000
134,167
 210,000
64,167
5
Managed content customers2,140,000
1,192,222
 1,790,000
546,944
3
Domains166,469
33,294
 166,469

5
Total identifiable intangible assets$3,258,469
$1,595,933
 $2,536,469
$730,278
 


Total identifiable intangible assets from the Ebyline and ZenContent purchase price allocationCompany’s acquisitions and other acquired assets along withnet of accumulated amortization thereon consists of the following:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Ebyline Intangible Assets$2,370,000 $2,370,000 
ZenContent Intangible Assets722,000 722,000 
Domains166,469 166,469 
TapInfluence Intangible Assets2,953,000 2,953,000 
Total$6,211,469 $6,211,469 
Less accumulated amortization(5,705,913)(4,599,953)
Intangible assets, net$505,556 $1,611,516 
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Ebyline Intangible Assets$2,370,000
 $2,370,000
ZenContent Intangible Assets722,000
 
Domains166,469
 166,469
Total Intangible Assets3,258,469
 2,536,469
Accumulated amortization(1,595,933) (730,278)
Intangible Assets, net$1,662,536
 $1,806,191


The Company is amortizing the identifiable intangible assets over a weighted averageremaining weighted-average period of 3 years. 7 months. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $310,000 reflected as an expense under impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company recorded the impairment on the TapInfluence developed technology to the extent that future cash flows after the Company's migration of TapInfluence customers and creators into the IZEAx platform were not expected to exceed the carrying value of the asset. There were 0 impairment charges associated with the Company’s identifiable intangible assets in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020.
54

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


Amortization expense recorded in generaldepreciation and administrative expenseamortization in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations was $865,655$1,105,960 and $730,278$1,228,433 for the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively.


The portion of this amortization expense specifically related to the costs of acquired technology that is excluded from cost of revenue and recorded in depreciation and amortization was $197,833 and $226,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

As of December 31, 2016,2020, future estimated amortization expense related to identifiable intangible assets over the next five years is set forth in the following schedule:
Intangible Asset
Amortization Expense
2021$505,556 
Total$505,556 
Year ending December 31:Amortization Expense
2017$994,628
2018349,432
2019207,349
202084,293
202126,834
Total$1,662,536



The Company’s goodwill balance changed as follows:
Amount
Balance on December 31, 2018$8,316,722 
Acquisitions, impairments or other changes during 2019
Balance on December 31, 20198,316,722 
Acquisitions, impairments or other changes during 2020(4,300,000)
Balance on December 31, 2020$4,016,722 

In March 2020, the Company performsidentified triggering events due to the reduction in its annual impairment testsprojected revenue due to adverse economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the continuation of a market capitalization below the Company’s carrying value, and uncertainty for recovery given the volatility of the capital markets surrounding COVID-19. The Company performed an interim assessment of goodwill, on October 1stusing the discounted cash flow method under the income approach and the guideline transaction method under the market approach, and determined that the carrying value of each year. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at theour Company’s reporting unit level. The Company has determined that prior to and afteras of March 31, 2020 exceeded the acquisition of Ebyline and ZenContent, it had and continues to have one reporting unit.fair value. As of October 1, 2016, the estimated fair valuea result of the valuation, the Company based on the current market pricerecorded a $4.3 million impairment of its common stock on October 1, 2016, exceeded its carrying value in excessgoodwill, which is reflected as an expense under impairment of $21 million. Therefore, management concluded that goodwill was not impaired; however, significant changesand intangible assets in the assumptions used inconsolidated statements of operations for the Company's impairment analysis, could result in additional non-cash impairment charges in future periods. Goodwill or any impairment thereon is not deductible for tax purposes.twelve months ended December 31, 2020.




NOTE 5.4.     SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS


Software development costs consists of the following:

December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Software development costs$1,492,665
 $1,021,446
Software development costs$3,036,810 $2,673,017 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(388,706) (207,514)
Less accumulated amortizationLess accumulated amortization(1,564,126)(1,153,037)
Software development costs, net$1,103,959
 $813,932
Software development costs, net$1,472,684 $1,519,980 


The Company determined that on April 15, 2013, its project to create IZEAx became technologically feasible and the development phase began. Throughout 2013 and the first quarter of 2014, the Company developed its new web-based advertising exchangeinfluencer marketing platform, IZEAx,. On March 17, 2014, the Company launched a public beta of IZEA.com powered by IZEAx. This platform is being utilized both internallyto enable influencer marketing and externally to facilitate native advertisingcontent creation campaigns on a greater scale. The Company continues to add new features and additional functionality to this platform each year. These new features will enable IZEAx and developed additional platforms in 2020, BrandGraph and Shake, to facilitate the contracting, workflow, and delivery or posting of direct content as well as provide for invoicing, collaborating, and direct payments for the Company's SaaS customers. In accordance with ASC 350-40, Internal Use SoftwareCompany’s customers and ASC 985-730, Computer Software Researchcreators. The Company capitalized software development costs of $363,793 and Development, research phase costs should be expensed as incurred$590,549 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and development phase costs including direct materials and services, payroll and benefits and interest costs may be capitalized.2019, respectively. As a result, the Company has capitalized $1,492,665a total of $3,036,810 in direct materials, consulting, payroll and benefit costs to its internal use software development costs in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016. 2020.
The Company amortizes its software development costs, commencing upon initial release of the software or additional features, on a straight-line basis over the estimated the useful life of its developed software to be 5five years, which is consistent with the amount of time its legacy platforms were in-service.

in service. Amortization expense on software development costs that is excluded from cost of revenue and recorded in generaldepreciation and administrativeamortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations was $181,192
55

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

$411,089 and $122,183$391,075 for the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively.

As After the transfer of December 31, 2016, future estimated amortization expense relatedcustomers to software development costs over the next five years is set forthnew workflow features implemented in the following schedule:
Year ending December 31:Software Amortization Expense
2017$298,533
2018298,533
2019213,201
2020176,351
2021117,341
 $1,103,959


NOTE 6.    DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
TheIZEAx 3.0 release, the Company evaluates its warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded componentsdiscontinued use of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 810-10-05-4 and 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet datepreviously developed technology totaling $234,047 and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recordedan impairment charge of $108,099 under impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon registration of the shares underlying the warrants, changes in price-based anti-dilution adjustments, conversion or exercise, as applicable, of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of the occurrence of the event and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to

reclassification are reclassified to a liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months after the balance sheet date.

As further described in Note 8, the Company has engaged in a series of private placements between 2011 and 2014 which resulted in the issuance of warrants. The Company determined that some of these warrants required classification as a liability due to certain provisions in their terms.
From July 20, 2015 through August 14, 2015, the Company offered a 26% discount on the warrant exercise prices to investors holding warrants from its February 2014 Private Placement (the "2014 Warrants"). If and to the extent a holder did not exercise its 2014 Warrants at the reduced exercise prices during this time period, the exercise prices of any unexercised 2014 Warrants remained at their original exercise prices of $7.00 and $10.00 per share for the series A and series B 2014 Warrants, respectively. In exchange for the reduction in the warrant exercise price, the investors holding a majority of the 2014 Warrants agreed to amend the 2014 Warrants to remove the price-based anti-dilution adjustment provisions contained in the 2014 Warrants. The removal of these provisions from the 2014 Warrants eliminated the provision that required liability classification of the 2014 Warrants and quarterly non-cash adjustments reflecting changes in the fair value of the derivative liability on the Company’s financial statements. Except for the temporarily reduced exercise prices and elimination of the anti-dilution adjustment provisions in the 2014 Warrants, the terms of the 2014 Warrants remain unchanged. As a result of the amendment in the 2014 Warrants terms, the 2014 Warrants no longer require liability classification after August 14, 2015.

At the close of the offer period on August 14, 2015, investors exchanged and converted 1,392,832 shares underlying the 2014 Warrants at the 26% discount for total proceeds of $8,760,805. The amendment of the 2014 Warrants to reduce the exercise price required the Company to treat the adjustment as an exchange whereby it computed the fair value of the 2014 Warrants immediately prior to the price reduction and the fair value of the 2014 Warrants after the price reduction. The $1,197,821 change in the fair value of the 2014 Warrants as a result of the price reduction was treated as a loss on exchange and recorded in the Company'saccompanying consolidated statements of operations during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.2019.

As a result of the above transactions, the fair value of $5,348,408 on the 1,392,832 exercised 2014 Warrants and the fair value of $1,181,638 on the 396,536 remaining unexercised 2014 Warrants as of August 14, 2015 was moved to equity as of August 14, 2015.

The following table summarizes the Company's activity and fair value calculations of its derivative warrants for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
 
Linked Common
Shares to
Derivative Warrants
Warrant
Liability
Balance, December 31, 20141,795,564
$3,203,465
Exercise of warrants for common stock(1,392,832)(5,348,408)
Loss on exchange of warrants
1,197,821
Reclassification of fair value of 2014 Private Placement warrants to equity(396,536)(1,181,638)
Change in fair value of derivatives
2,133,820
Balance, December 31, 20156,196
5,060
Expiration of warrants(694)
Change in fair value of derivatives
(5,060)
Balance, December 31, 20165,502
$


As of December 31, 2016,2020, future estimated amortization expense related to software development costs is set forth in the following schedule:
Software Development Amortization Expense
2021$455,841 
2022400,474 
2023359,685 
2024177,764 
202578,920 
Total$1,472,684 


NOTE 5.     ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Accrued payroll liabilities$1,504,113 $1,202,765 
Accrued taxes286,455 117,698 
Current portion of finance obligation30,487 26,837 
Accrued other103,918 30,256 
Total accrued expenses$1,924,973 $1,377,556 


NOTE 6.    NOTES PAYABLE

Canada Emergency Business Account (“CEBA”) Loan
On April 22, 2020, the Company had 5,502 warrant shares issued in its September 2012 public offering that still require classification asreceived a liability due to certain registration rights and listing requirementsCanadian dollar loan in the agreements.principal amount of 40,000 CAD ($31,422 USD as of December 31, 2020), from TD Canada Trust Bank pursuant to a CEBA term loan agreement (the “CEBA Loan”). The fairCEBA Loan has an initial term from inception through December 31, 2022 (the “Initial Term”) and an extended term from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025 (the “Extended Term”). NaN interest is accrued and 0 payments are due on the loan during the Initial Term. If the Company repays 75% of the CEBA Loan (30,000 CAD) on or prior to December 31, 2022, the remaining 10,000 CAD balance will be forgiven. Otherwise, interest will begin to accrue on the unpaid balance on January 1, 2023 with monthly interest payments commencing on January 31, 2023 until the CEBA Loan is paid in full on or before the end of the Extended Term.

Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) Loan

On April 23, 2020, the Company received a loan from Western Alliance Bank (the “Lender”) in the principal amount of $1,905,100, under the PPP evidenced by a promissory note issued by the Company (the “Note”) to the Lender. 
The term of the Note is two years, though it may be payable sooner in connection with an event of default under the Note. The PPP Loan carries a fixed interest rate of 1 percent per year. Certain amounts received under the PPP Loan may be forgiven if the loan proceeds are used for eligible purposes, including payroll costs and certain rent or utility costs, and the Company meets other requirements regarding, among other things, the maintenance of employment and compensation levels.

Loan payments on the PPP Loan may be deferred to either (1) the date that the SBA remits the Company’s loan forgiveness amount to the Lender or (2) ten months after the end of the Company’s loan forgiveness covered period, if the Company does not apply for loan forgiveness. The Company submitted its forgiveness application for the entire amount of the loan in December 2020 and is awaiting approval from the SBA. The forgiveness of the PPP Loan is dependent on the Company
56

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

qualifying for the forgiveness of the PPP Loan based on its adherence to the forgiveness criteria under the CARES Act, and no assurance is provided that the Company will obtain forgiveness of the PPP Loan in whole or in part.

Finance Obligation

The Company has 2 long term payment plans with a vendor to pay for its computer equipment in 4 annual payments between October 2019 and February 2023. The Company used an imputed interest rate of 9.5%, based on its incremental borrowing rate, to determine the present value of its finance obligation. The total balance owed was $74,295 and outstanding derivative warrant liability related to these warrant shares$72,510 as of December 31, 2016 was $0. During2020 and 2019, respectively, with the twelve months ended December 31, 2016short-term portion of $30,487 and 2015, the Company$26,837 recorded a gain of $5,060 and a loss of $2,133,820, respectively, due to the changeunder accrued expenses in the fair value of its warrant liability.

The Company's warrants were valued on the applicable dates using a Binomial Lattice Option Valuation Technique (“Binomial”). Significant inputs into this techniqueconsolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20162020 and 2015 were as follows:2019, respectively.


Secured Credit Facility
Binomial AssumptionsDecember 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
Fair market value of asset (1)
$4.51$7.66
Exercise price$25.00$25.00
Term (2)
0.7 years1.7 years
Implied expected life (3)
0.7 years1.7 years
Volatility range of inputs (4)
55.91%83.00%
Equivalent volatility (3)
55.91%83.00%
Risk-free interest rate range of inputs (5)
0.85%1.06%
Equivalent risk-free interest rate (3)
0.85%1.06%
(1)  The fair market value of the asset was determined by using the Company's closing stock price as reflected in the OTCQB for the period ended December 31, 2015 and the Nasdaq Capital Market for the period ended December 31, 2016.
(2)  The term is the contractual remaining term, allocated among twelve equal intervals for purposes of calculating other inputs, such as volatility and risk-free rate.
(3)  The implied expected life, and equivalent volatility and risk-free interest rate amounts are derived from the Binomial.
(4)  The Company does not have a market trading history upon which to base its forward-looking volatility. Accordingly, the Company selected peer companies that provided a reasonable basis upon which to calculate volatility for each of the intervals described in (2), above.
(5)  The risk-free rates used for inputs represent the yields on zero coupon U.S. Government Securities with periods to maturity consistent with the intervals described in (2), above.

NOTE 7.    COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES

Credit Agreement
The Company has a secured credit facility agreement (also referred to herein as “line of credit”) with Western Alliance Bank, the parent company of Bridge Bank, N.A. of San Jose, California, which it obtained on March 1, 2013 and expanded on April 13, 2015. Pursuant to thisthe secured credit facility agreement, as amended, the Company may submit requests for funding up to 80% of its eligible accounts receivable up to a maximum credit limit of $5 million. This agreement is secured by the Company'sCompany’s accounts receivable and substantially all of the Company'sCompany’s other assets. The agreement automatically renews annuallyin April of each year and requires the Company to pay an annual facility fee of $20,000 (0.4% of the credit limit) and an annual due diligence fee of $1,000. Interest accrues on the advances at the rate of prime plus 2%1.5% per annum. Theannum and the default rate of interest is prime plus 7%. As

The Company had 0 amounts outstanding under this secured credit facility as of December 31, 20162020 and 2015, the Company had no advances outstanding under this agreement. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a net accounts receivable balance of $3,745,695.2019. Assuming that all of the the Company'sCompany’s trade accounts receivable balance wasreceivables were eligible for funding, it hasthe Company would have approximately $4.1 million in available credit of $2,996,556 under the agreement as of December 31, 2016.2020.


The Company incurred $21,000 and $23,184 in costs related to this credit facility and expansion during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These costsannual fees are capitalized in the Company'sCompany’s consolidated balance sheet within other current assets and are amortized to interest expense over one year. The Company amortized $19,796 and $18,388 of these costs through interest expense duringDuring the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015, respectively.2019, the Company amortized $21,000 and $25,215, respectively, of the secured credit facility costs through interest expense. The remaining value of the capitalized loan costs related to the Bridge Bank Credit Agreementsecured credit facility as of December 31, 20162020 is $7,000. This$7,000; this amount will be amortized to interest expense over the next four months.

Interest expense on financing arrangements recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations was $36,125 and $60,155 during fiscal 2017.the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, the future contractual maturities of our debt obligations by year is set forth in the following schedule:

2021$1,507,626 
2022492,771 
202310,420 
Total$2,010,817 


NOTE 7.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments
Operating Leases
The Company’s corporate headquarters arewere located at 480 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 200 in Winter Park, Florida. The Company occupies this office pursuant to a five years, five months sublease agreement that expires in April 2019 and is renewable for one additional yearFlorida until its lease expired on April 30, 2020. TheDue to its current work from home policy enacted on March 16, 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company leases approximately 15,500 square feet based on an annually increasing rate of $17.50has not yet entered into any new lease agreement for its headquarters and does not intend to $22.50 per square foot over the lease term. do so until advisable. The Company also leasesoccupied flexible office space under one year renewablemonthly, quarterly or semi-annual membership contracts in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Chicago, and Toronto.Toronto during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. These contracts were not renewed upon expiration of their terms during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020.


Capital Leases
57

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
During 2013 and 2014,Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Upon the January 1, 2019 adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, the Company entered into capital leaseselected the short-term lease exemption policy, applying the requirements of ASU No. 2016-02 to only long-term (greater than 1 year) leases. Upon adoption, the Company had 1 material lease greater than 12 months in duration. This was the lease associated with its corporate headquarters in Winter Park, Florida. The adoption of this standard resulted in the Company recording an operating right-of-use asset of $410,852 and an associated lease liability of $399,892. The operating lease liability was determined based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate of 9.5% and the operating lease right-of-use asset was determined based on the value of the lease liabilities, adjusted for equipmenta deferred rent balance, which expire on various dates between December 2015was previously included in current liabilities.

The Company had an operating right-of-use asset of $107,831 under other current assets and January 2016. There are no remaining obligations outstanding under capital leases ata lease liability of $83,807 in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.2019. These were fully recognized upon expiration of the lease in April 2020. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded $1,330 and $24,462, respectively, of accretion on its lease liability through rent expense in general and administrative expenses.


A summary of future minimum lease paymentsThe Company has 0 obligations under the Company's non-cancelablefinance leases as of December 31, 2016 is as follows:

Year ending December 31: Operating Leases
2017 $449,295
2018 333,417
2019 113,516
Total minimum lease payments $896,228

2020. Total rentoperating lease expense and other short-term lease expense recorded in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations was approximately $618,940$264,048 and $491,543$627,101 for the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively. Cash paid for the 1 operating lease was $113,516 and $340,548 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.


Retirement Plans
In December 2007, the
The Company introducedoffers a 401(k) plan that coveredto all of its eligible employees. The Company matches participant contributions in an amount equal to 50% of each participant'sparticipant’s contribution up to 8% of the participant'sparticipant’s salary. The participants become vested in 20% annual increments after two years of service. DuringTotal expense for employer matching contributions during the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019 was recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as follows:
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Cost of revenue$27,990 $45,778 
Sales and marketing57,389 60,457 
General and administrative65,752 53,346 
Total contribution expense$151,131 $159,581 

Litigation

A securities class action lawsuit, Julian Perez, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. IZEA, Inc., et al., case number 2:18-cv-02784-SVW-GJS was instituted April 4, 2018 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against the Company incurred $166,271 and $125,262, respectively,certain of its executive officers on behalf of certain purchasers of its common stock. The plaintiffs sought to recover damages for investors under federal securities laws. The Company estimated and accrued a potential loss of $500,000 relating to its potential liability arising from the Perez lawsuit and accrued for such amount in expenseits financial statements for matching employer contributions.the year ended December 31, 2018. 


LitigationOn April 15, 2019, a stipulation of settlement was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California that contained settlement terms as agreed upon by the parties to the Perez class action lawsuit described above. The motion for preliminary approval of the settlement was granted on May 7, 2019. According to the terms of the settlement, as agreed upon by the parties, the Company’s insurer deposited $800,000 into the settlement fund and the Company paid the remainder of the Company’s previously accrued insurance deductible of $400,000 into escrow to be used as settlement funds, inclusive of lead plaintiff awards and lead counsel fees. The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California issued an order approving the settlement of the Perez class action lawsuit on September 26, 2019, which required that the lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice.

On July 3, 2018, a shareholder derivative lawsuit, Korene Stuart v. Edward H. Murphy et al., case number A-18-777135-C was instituted in the Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Clark County against certain executive officers and members of the Board of Directors for IZEA. IZEA was named as a nominal defendant. The plaintiff sought to recover damages on behalf of the Company for purported breaches of the individual defendants’ fiduciary duties as
58

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

directors and/or officers of IZEA, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets in violation of state common law.

Additionally, on October 19, 2018, a shareholder derivative lawsuit, Dennis E. Emond v. Edward H. Murphy et al., case number 2:18-cv-9040, was instituted in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against certain executive officers and members of the Board of Directors for IZEA. IZEA was named as a nominal defendant. An amended complaint was filed on October 31, 2018. The plaintiff sought to recover damages on behalf of the Company for purported breaches of the individual defendants’ fiduciary duties as directors and/or officers of IZEA, and gross mismanagement, and under federal securities laws.

On March 6, 2019, a stipulation of settlement was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California that contained settlement terms as agreed upon by the parties to the Stuart and Emond shareholder derivative lawsuits described above (the “Settlement”). The Settlement terms agreed upon by the parties included that IZEA would direct its insurers to make a payment of $300,000 as a fee and service award to the plaintiffs and their counsel in the Stuart and Emond lawsuits and further that IZEA would enact certain corporate governance reforms. The motion for preliminary approval of the Settlement was granted on August 28, 2019 by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California issued an order on January 13, 2020, which required that the Emond lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice. According to the terms of the Settlement, as agreed upon by the parties, following the approval of the Settlement by the U. S. District Court for the Central District of California and on or before February 26, 2020, the parties were required to seek an order from the Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada dismissing the Stuart lawsuit with prejudice. On or about March 6, 2020, the Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada issued an order dismissing the Stuart lawsuit with prejudice.

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various other lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Litigation is, however, subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm the Company'sCompany’s business. The Company is currently not aware of any legal proceedings or claims that it believes would or could have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on its operationsthe Company. Regardless of final outcomes, however, any such proceedings or financial position.claims may nonetheless impose a significant burden on management and employees and may come with costly defense costs or unfavorable preliminary interim rulings.




NOTE 8.    STOCKHOLDERS'STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


Authorized Shares

The Company has 200,000,000 authorized shares of common stock and 10,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, each with a par value of $0.0001$0.0001 per share.
Reverse
Sale of Securities

May 10, 2019 Public Offering

On May 10, 2019, the Company closed on its underwritten registered public offering of 14,285,714 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $0.70 per share, for total gross proceeds of approximately $10 million. The net proceeds to the Company were approximately $9.2 million. Mr. Edward Murphy, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a Company director, and Mr. Troy J. Vanke, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, participated in the public offering and purchased 21,428 and 42,857 shares of stock, respectively.

This offering was made pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-230688) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 2, 2019, which became effective on May 8, 2019.

At the Market (ATM) Offering

On June 4, 2020, the Company entered into an ATM Sales Agreement (the “2020 Sales Agreement”) with National Securities Corporation, as sales agent (“National Securities”), pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time, through National Securities, shares of the Company's common stock, by any method deemed to be an “at the market offering” (the “ATM Offering”).

59

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

On June 12, 2020, the Company entered into an amendment to the 2020 Sales Agreement to increase the amount of common stock that may be offered and sold in the ATM Offering to $40,000,000 in the aggregate. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had sold 14,819,740 shares at an average price of $1.92 per share for total gross proceeds of $28,455,096.

Stock SplitIssued for Acquisitions

TapInfluence
On July 26, 2018, the Company completed its merger with TapInfluence, Inc., pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 11, 2018, by and among the Company, IZEA Merger Sub, Inc., TapInfluence, certain stockholders of TapInfluence and the stockholders’ representative, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated as of July 20, 2018 (the “Merger Agreement”). The merger was consummated, in part, to further consolidate the influencer marketing industry for the Company, and for the Company to obtain benefits from the acquisition of the TapInfluence technology platform and existing customer base, particularly from TapInfluence’s self-service customers. The aggregate consideration paid at closing for the acquisition of TapInfluence consisted of a cash payment of $1,500,000 and the issuance of 1,150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $1,759,500, or $1.53 per share. Aggregate post-acquisition date consideration consisted of additional payments totaling $4,500,000, less $115,417 related to the final working capital adjustment calculation.

On January 6, 2016,26, 2019, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effect a reverse stock split of the issued and outstanding660,136 shares of its common stock valued at a ratio of one share for every 20 shares outstanding prior to the effective date of the reverse stock split. All current and historical information contained herein related to the share and$884,583, or $1.34 per share, information forusing the Company's common stock or stock equivalents reflects the 1-for-20 reverse stock split of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock that became market effective on January 11, 2016. There was no change in the number of the Company's authorized shares of common stock.

Nasdaq Uplisting
On January 26, 2016, the Company's shares of common stock commenced trading on30-day Volume Weighted Average Price (“VWAP”) as reported by the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) prior to the issuance date, to settle amounts due under its acquisition cost payable. The Company recorded a $191,439 loss on the symbol IZEA. Prior thereto,settlement of this acquisition cost payable as a result of the Company'sdifference between the actual closing market price of the common stock was quotedof $1.63 on the OTCQB marketplace undersettlement date and the same symbol.30-day VWAP of $1.34 required by the Merger Agreement.


Stock Issued for Purchases
As further discussed in Note 2, onOn July 30, 2015,26, 2019, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement with TapInfluence, the Company issued 31,8216,908,251 shares of its common stock valued at $250,000$3,500,000, or $0.50664 per share, using the 30-day VWAP as reported by Nasdaq prior to satisfythe issuance date, to settle amounts due under its acquisition cost payable. The Company recognized a portiongain of $752,591 on the settlement of this acquisition cost payable as a result of the guaranteed purchasedifference between the actual closing market price payment perof the Ebyline Stock Purchase Agreement. On January 29, 2016, the Company issued 114,398 shares of common stock valued at $848,832 to satisfyof $0.3977 on the annual guaranteed paymentsettlement date and the 30-day VWAP of $938,532 less $89,700 in closing related expenses owed as part of$0.50664 required by the Ebyline Stock PurchaseMerger Agreement.


ZenContent

On July 31, 2016, the Company purchased of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of ZenContent pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2016, by and among IZEA, ZenContent and the stockholders of ZenContent.ZenContent (the “ZenContent Stock Purchase Agreement”) for a maximum purchase price to be paid over three years of $4,500,000. Upon closing, the Company (a) paid a cash payment of $400,000 and (b) issued 86,207 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $600,000 (using$600,000. The ZenContent Stock Purchase Agreement also required (i) 3 equal annual installment payments totaling $1,000,000, subject to a working capital adjustment, commencing 12 months following the 30 trading-day volume-weighted average closing priceand (ii) contingent performance payments of up to an aggregate of $2,500,000 over the three consecutive 12-month periods following the closing, based upon ZenContent achieving certain minimum revenue thresholds. Of these payments, 33% of each such annual installment or contingent performance payment were to be in the form of cash and the remainder of such payment was to be in the form of either cash or additional shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock of $6.96 per share as of July 29, 2016)(determined at the Company’s option).

Stock Issued for Services
On April 30, 2015 and on December 29, 2015,July 31, 2019, the Company issued 1,250made the third and 1,364final annual installment payment under the ZenContent Stock Purchase Agreement, comprised of $111,111 in cash and 447,489 shares respectively, of its common stock valued at $18,700 for employee stock awards during$222,223 or $0.4966 per share, using the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

On August 15, 2015, the Company issued 84,375 shares of common stock to Brian W. Brady for shares granted to him in 201330-day VWAP as consideration for loans madereported by Nasdaq prior to the Company.

The Company issued 13,767 shares of common stock valued at $107,292 to five directors for their service as directors of the Company during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

The Company issued each of its five independent directors 811 shares of restricted common stock valued at $6,250 for their service as directors of the Company during the first quarter of 2016. On May 16, 2016, the Company issued each of its five independent directors 3,261 shares of restricted common stock valued at $18,750 for their service as directors of the Company for the period of April 2016 through December 2016. The stock vested in equal increments of approximately 362 shares per month. Total shares issued during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 were 20,360 at a total initial value of $125,000.

On April 11, 2016, the Company issued 749 shares of restricted common stock valued at $4,794 to four employees as a contest award.

The following table contains summarized information about nonvested restricted stock outstanding during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016:
Restricted StockCommon SharesWeighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Weighted Average
Remaining Years
to Vest
Nonvested at December 31, 2015
$
 
Granted21,109
6.15
 
Vested(21,109)6.34
 
Forfeited

 
Nonvested at December 31, 2016
$
 

Total expense recognized for stock-based payments for services during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $133,897 and $125,992, respectively. The fair value of the services is based on the value of the Company's common stock over the term of service.issuance date. The Company recognized a gain of $4,103 as a change in the fair value of derivatives during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, based$41,258 on the change between the Company's stock price upon issuance and the Company's stock price upon the datesettlement of vesting. There is no remaining future compensation related to nonvested restricted awards as of December 31, 2016.

Warrant Transactions
Warrant Issuances:
On January 22, 2015, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock to an investor relations consultant. The warrant was fully vested on the date of issuance, has an exercise price of $10.20 per share and expires on January 22, 2020. The fair value of the warrant upon issuance was $7,700 and the Company received $100 as compensation for the warrant. The fair value of the warrant issuance was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital in the Company's consolidated balance sheet and the net $7,600 compensation expense was recorded in general and administrative expense during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

On June 30, 2015, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock to an investor relations consultant. The warrant was fully vested on the date of issuance, has an exercise price of $10.20 per share and expires on June 30, 2020. The fair value of the warrant upon issuance was $44,250. The fair value of the warrant issuance was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital in the Company's consolidated balance sheet and compensation expense in general and administrative expense during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

Warrant Exercises:
From July 20, 2015 through August 14, 2015, the Company offered a 25% discount on the warrant exercise prices to investors holding the series A and series B warrants to purchase common stock issued in its August - September 2013 private placement (the “2013 Warrants”) and a 26% discount on the warrant exercise prices to investors holding series A and series B warrants to purchase common stock issued in its February 2014 private placement (the “2014 Warrants” and together with the 2013 Warrants, the "Warrants"). If and to the extent a holder did not exercise its Warrants at the reduced exercise prices during this time period,

the exercise prices of any unexercised Warrants remain at their original exercise prices of $5.00 and $10.00 per share for the series A and series B 2013 Warrants, respectively, and $7.00 and $10.00 per share for the series A and series B 2014 Warrants, respectively.

The warrant exercise offer was made pursuant to the terms of Warrant Amendment and Exercise Agreements, dated July 20, 2015, entered into with holders owning more than 70% of the Company's outstanding 2013 and 2014 Warrants. In exchange for the reduction in the warrant exercise price, the investors holding a majority of the 2014 Warrants agreed to amend the 2014 Warrants to remove the price-based anti-dilution adjustment provisions contained in the 2014 Warrants. The removal of these provisions from the 2014 Warrants eliminated the provision that required liability classification of the 2014 Warrants and quarterly non-cash adjustments reflecting changes in the fair value of the derivative liability on the Company’s financial statements. Except for the temporarily reduced exercise prices and elimination of the anti-dilution adjustment provisions in the 2014 Warrants, the terms of the 2013 Warrants and 2014 Warrants remain unchanged. As a result of the amendment in the 2014 Warrants terms, the 2014 Warrants no longer require liability classification after August 14, 2015 (See Note 6).

At the close of the offer period on August 14, 2015, investors exchanged and converted 1,392,832 shares underlying the 2014 Warrants at the 26% discount for total proceeds of $8,760,805 and 798,715 shares of the 2013 Warrants at the 25% discount for total proceeds of $4,100,252. This resulted in the issuance of a total of 2,191,547 shares of common stock at an average exercise price of $5.87 per share for total proceeds of $12,861,057. The exercise prices of any Warrants not exercised during the Warrant conversion offer period have reverted back to their original exercise prices.

The amendment of the Warrants to reduce the exercise price required the Company to treat the adjustment as an exchange whereby it computed the fair value of the Warrants immediately prior to the price reduction and the fair value of the Warrants after the price reduction. The $1,197,821 and the $647,989 change in the fair value of the 2014 and 2013 Warrants, respectively,acquisition cost payable as a result of the price reduction, was treated as a $1,845,810 loss on exchange and recorded indifference between the Company's consolidated statement of operations during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

As a result of the above transactions, the fair value of $5,348,408 on the 1,392,832 exercised 2014 Warrants and the fair value of $1,181,638 on the 396,536 remaining unexercised 2014 Warrants as of August 14, 2015 was moved to equity as of August 14, 2015. This reclassification plus the $647,989 loss on exchange of the 2013 Warrants already classified as equity reflects a $7,178,035 total change recorded in the Company's consolidated statement of stockholders' equity during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

The resaleactual closing market price of the common stock underlyingof $0.4044 on the 2013settlement date and 2014 Warrants is coveredthe 30-day VWAP of $0.4966 required by IZEA’s Registration Statements on Form S-1 (Registration Nos. 333-191743, 333-195081 and 333-197482), which are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.ZenContent Stock Purchase Agreement.


Stock OptionsEquity Incentive Plans

In May 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (the(as amended, the “May 2011 Plan”). The stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the Company’s May 2011 Plan allowsat its 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on December 18, 2020, to allow the Company to grantaward restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options to purchasecovering up to 1,000,0007,500,000 shares of common stock as an incentive
60

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

compensation for its employees and consultants. As of December 31, 2016,2020, the Company had 28,0813,812,928 remaining shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to future grants under the May 2011 Plan.


OnIn August 22, 2011, the Company adopted the 2011 B Equity Incentive Plan (the “August 2011 Plan”) reserving 4,375 shares of common stock for issuance under the August 2011 Plan. As of December 31, 2016,2020, the Company had no4,375 remaining shares of common stock available for future grants under the August 2011 Plan.


Restricted Stock

Under both the May 2011 Plan and the August 2011 Plan (together, the "2011“2011 Equity Incentive Plans"Plans”), the Board determines the terms and conditions of Directorseach restricted stock issuance, including any future vesting restrictions.

The Company issued 27,184 shares of restricted stock on March 28, 2019 to Mr. Edward Murphy, its Chief Executive Officer, for amounts owed on his fourth quarter 2018 performance bonus. The stock was initially valued at $36,427 and vests in equal monthly installments over 12 months from issuance. The Company issued 4,570 shares of restricted stock on March 28, 2019 to Mr. Ryan Schram, its Chief Operating Officer, for amounts owed on his fourth quarter 2018 performance bonus. The stock was initially valued at $6,124 and vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months from issuance.

On January 31, 2019, the Company issued its 6 independent directors a total of 88,758 shares of restricted common stock initially valued at $150,000 for their annual service as directors of the Company. The stock vested in equal monthly installments from January through December 2019. One director forfeited 4,932 of these shares valued at $8,335 upon their resignation from the board of directors in September 2019.

On January 31, 2020, the Company issued its 5 independent directors a total of 390,625 shares of restricted common stock initially valued at $125,000 for their annual service as directors of the Company. The stock vests in equal monthly installments from January through December 2020.

The following table contains summarized information about restricted stock issued during the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020:
Restricted StockCommon SharesWeighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Weighted Average
Remaining Years
to Vest
Nonvested at December 31, 201857,984 $3.70 1.4
Granted120,512 1.60 
Vested(139,157)2.24 
Forfeited(8,057)3.18 
Nonvested at December 31, 201931,282 $2.15 1.9
Granted390,625 0.32 
Vested(408,241)0.39 
Forfeited
Nonvested at December 31, 202013,666 $2.28 1.4

Although restricted stock is issued upon the grant of an award, the Company excludes restricted stock from the computations within the financial statements of total shares outstanding and basic earnings per share until such time as the restricted stock vests.

Expense recognized on restricted stock issued to non-employees for services was $125,000 and $141,665 during twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Expense recognized on restricted stock issued to employees was $33,677 and $169,534 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

On December 31, 2020, the fair value of the Company’s common stock was approximately $1.82 per share and the intrinsic value on the non-vested restricted stock was $24,872. Future compensation expense related to issued, but non-vested, restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2020 is $31,202. This value is estimated to be recognized over the weighted-average vesting period of approximately five months.


61

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Restricted Stock Units

The Board determines the terms and conditions of each restricted stock unit award issued under the May 2011 Plan.

The Company issued 131,235 restricted stock units on May 17, 2019 to Mr. Murphy under the terms of his amended employment agreement. The restricted stock units were initially valued at $76,510 and vest in equal monthly installments over 36 months from issuance. The Company issued 258,312 restricted stock units on August 29, 2019 to Mr. Murphy under the terms of his amended employment agreement. The restricted stock units were initially valued at $82,660 and vest in equal monthly installments over 48 months from issuance.

The Company issued 890 restricted stock units on May 14, 2019 to Mr. Troy Vanke, the Company’s then Chief Financial Officer, under the terms of his employment agreement. The restricted stock units were initially valued at $578 and vest in equal monthly installments over 12 months from issuance. Upon his departure in August 2019, 667 of these shares were forfeited.

The Company issued 84,994 restricted stock units on January 3, 2020 to Mr. Schram under the terms of his employment agreement. The restricted stock units were initially valued at $23,739 and vest in equal monthly installments over 48 months from issuance. The Company also issued 100,000 restricted stock units on January 3, 2020 to Mr. Schram as additional incentive compensation. The restricted stock units were initially valued at $27,930 and vest in a lump sum 12 months from issuance.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued a total of 583,322 restricted stock units initially valued at $215,936 to non-executive employees as additional incentive compensation. The restricted stock units vest 12 months from issuance.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued Mr. Murphy 123,228 restricted stock units valued at $61,790 for bonuses owed under the terms of his amended employment agreement. The restricted stock units vest in equal monthly installments over 36 months from issuance.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued Mr. Schram 41,824 restricted stock units initially valued at $14,052 for bonuses owed under the terms of his employment agreement. The restricted stock units vest in equal monthly installments over 48 months from issuance.
The following table contains summarized information about restricted stock units during the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020:
Restricted Stock UnitsCommon SharesWeighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Weighted Average
Remaining Years
to Vest
Nonvested at December 31, 2018160,000 $1.04 1.0
Granted410,437 0.40 
Vested(149,290)0.79 
Forfeited(54,335)1.04 
Nonvested at December 31, 2019366,812 $0.42 3.2
Granted930,145 0.37 
Vested(172,441)0.41 
Forfeited(154,167)0.30 
Nonvested at December 31, 2020970,349 $0.39 1.2

Expense recognized on restricted stock units issued to employees was $214,528 and $117,794 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. On December 31, 2020, the fair value of the Company’s common stock was approximately $1.82 per share and the intrinsic value on the non-vested restricted units was $1,766,035. Future compensation related to the non-vested restricted stock units as of December 31, 2020 is $235,016 and it is estimated to be recognized over the weighted-average vesting period of approximately 1.2 years.

62

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Stock Options 
Under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plans, the Board determines the exercise price to be paid for the stock option shares, the period within which each stock option may be exercised, and the terms and conditions of each stock option. The exercise price of the incentive and non-qualified stock options may not be less than 100% of the fair market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. If an individual owns stock representing more than 10% of the outstanding shares, the exercise price of each share of an incentive stock option must be equal to or exceed 110% of fair market value. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors at the time of grant, the purchaseexercise price is set at the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date (or the last trading day prior to the grant date, if it is awarded on a non-trading day). Additionally, the term is set at ten years and the optionsoption typically vestvests on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period as follows: 25% of options shall vest one year from the date of grant andwith the remaining options shall vestvesting monthly in equal increments over the following three years. years. The Company issues new shares to the optionee for any stock awards or options exercised pursuant tounder its 2011 Equity Incentive Plans.


A summary of option activity under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plans forduring the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,December 31, 2020, is presented below:

Options OutstandingCommon SharesWeighted Average
Exercise Price
Weighted Average
Remaining Life
(Years)
Outstanding at December 31, 20181,040,477 $5.23 6.5
Granted586,552 0.67 
Expired(147,313)7.59 
Forfeited(121,879)2.70 
Outstanding at December 31, 20191,357,837 $3.24 7.2
Granted411,350 0.69 
Exercised(369)1.00 
Expired
Forfeited(56,012)5.08 
Outstanding at December 31, 20201,712,806 $2.56 6.9
Exercisable at December 31, 2020997,320 $3.84 5.7

Options OutstandingCommon Shares 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted Average
Remaining Life
(Years)
Outstanding at December 31, 2014595,786
 $9.20
 6.5
Granted277,059
 7.43
  
Exercised
 
  
Forfeited(42,246) 7.70
  
Outstanding at December 31, 2015830,599
 $8.65
 6.8
Granted179,998
 6.16
  
Exercised
 
  
Forfeited(50,733) 10.15
  
Outstanding at December 31, 2016959,864
 $8.11
 6.4
      
Exercisable at December 31, 2016545,558
 $9.20
 5.4

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, no2020, 369 options were exercised.exercised for gross proceeds of $369. The intrinsic value on exercised options was $265. There were 0 options exercised during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. The fair value of the Company's common stock on December 31, 20162020 was $4.51approximately $1.82 per share. Theshare and the intrinsic value on outstanding options as of December 31, 20162020 was $8,080.$1,127,194. The intrinsic value on exercisable options as of December 31, 20162020 was $7,098.$364,866.


A summary of the nonvested stock option activity under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plans forduring the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,December 31, 2020, is presented below:
Nonvested OptionsCommon SharesWeighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Weighted Average
Remaining Years
to Vest
Nonvested at December 31, 2018300,510 $0.80 2.4
Granted586,552 0.40 
Vested(197,202)1.44 
Forfeited(89,081)0.80 
Nonvested at December 31, 2019600,779 $0.64 3.0
Granted411,350 0.56 
Vested(283,766)0.72 
Forfeited(12,877)0.88 
Nonvested at December 31, 2020715,486 $0.56 2.5

63

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Nonvested OptionsCommon Shares 
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Weighted Average
Remaining Years
to Vest
Nonvested at December 31, 2014372,092
 $4.00
 3.0
Granted277,059
 3.84
  
Vested(147,759) 4.32
  
Forfeited(39,466) 3.44
  
Nonvested at December 31, 2015461,926
 $3.84
 2.8
Granted179,998
 2.88
  
Vested(187,181) 4.00
  
Forfeited(40,437) 3.76
  
Nonvested at December 31, 2016414,306
 $3.60
 2.6
There were outstanding options to purchase 1,712,806 shareswith a weighted average exercise price of $2.56 per share, of which options to purchase 997,320 shares were exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $3.84 per share as of December 31, 2020.


Stock-based compensation cost related toExpense recognized on stock options granted under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plans is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company estimates the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses the assumptions stated in Note 1. Total stock-based compensation expense recognized on option awards outstanding during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $748,092 and $705,466, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense was recorded as $89,583issued to sales and marketing and $658,509 to general and administrative expense in the Company's consolidated statement of operations during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. Stock-based compensation expense was recorded as $58,595 to sales and marketing and $646,871 to general and administrative expense in the Company's consolidated statement of operationsemployees during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.2020 and 2019 was $225,083 and $339,942, respectively. Future compensation related to nonvestednon-vested awards expected to vestas of $1,215,910December 31, 2020 is $361,498, and it is estimated to be recognized over the weighted-average vesting period of approximately three years.2.5 years.


The following table shows the number of stock options granted under the Company’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plans and the assumptions used to determine the fair value of those options using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
Period EndedTotal Stock
Options
Granted
Weighted-Average Exercise PriceWeighted-Average Expected TermWeighted-Average VolatilityWeighted-Average Risk-Free Interest RateExpected DividendsWeighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
December 31, 2019586,552$0.676 years64.38%1.92%$0.40
December 31, 2020411,350$0.696 years108.58%0.46%$0.56

Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On April 16, 2014, stockholders holding a majority of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock, upon previous recommendation
The amended and approval of the Board of Directors, adopted therestated IZEA Worldwide, Inc. 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) and reserved 75,000, provides for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock for issuance thereunder. Any employeeto employees regularly employed by the Company for 90 days or more on a full-time or part-time basis (20 hours or more per week on a regular schedule) is eligible to participate in the ESPP.. The ESPP operates in successive six month months offering periods commencing at the beginning of each fiscal year half. Each eligible employee who elects to participate may purchase up to 10% of their annual compensation in common

stock not to exceed $21,250 annually or 1,0002,000 shares per offering period. The purchase price will be the lower of (i) 85% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the first trading day of the offering period or (ii) 85% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the last trading day of the offering period. The ESPP will continue until January 1, 2024, unless otherwise terminated by the Board. Employees

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, employees paid $76,170$5,320 to purchase 13,4035,539 shares of common stock during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. Employees paid $58,021and $6,979 to purchase 11,45326,411 shares of common stock, during the twelve months endedrespectively. As of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016,2020, the Company had 49,762395,613 remaining shares of common stock available for future grantsissuances under the ESPP.



Summary Stock-Based Compensation

NOTE 9.     INCOME TAXES
The componentsStock-based compensation cost related to all awards granted to employees is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the Company’s net deferred income taxes areaward, and is recognized as follows (rounded):
 December 31,
2016
December 31,
2015
Deferred tax assets:  
Net operating loss carry forwards$17,875,000
$15,649,000
Accrued expenses256,000
187,000
Stock option and warrant expenses804,000
618,000
Accounts receivable90,000
52,000
Deferred rent36,000
44,000
Other3,000
3,000
Total deferred tax assets19,064,000
16,553,000
Valuation allowance(18,475,000)(15,871,000)
Net deferred tax assets589,000
682,000
   
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Fixed and tangible assets(589,000)(682,000)
Total deferred tax liabilities(589,000)(682,000)
   
Total deferred tax assets (liabilities)$
$

The following summary reconciles differences from taxes atan expense over the federal statutory rate withemployee’s requisite service period utilizing the effective rate:
 Years Ended December 31,
 20162015
Federal income tax at statutory rates(34.0)%(34.0)%
Change in deferred tax asset valuation allowance39.0 %28.8 %
Deferred state taxes(3.2)%(2.5)%
Non-deductible expenses:  
Meals & entertainment0.4 %0.3 %
Change in fair value of warrants %6.4 %
ISO stock compensation1.3 %0.7 %
Change in state deferred rate(4.2)% %
Other0.7 %0.3 %
Income taxes (benefit) at effective rates % %

The Company has incurred net losses for tax purposes every year since inception. At December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $47,080,000weighted-average forfeiture rates disclosed in net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. federalNote 1. Total stock-based compensation expense recognized on restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, and state income tax purposes that expire in various amounts between the years of 2026 and 2036. The Company's ability to deduct its historical net operating losses may be limited in the future due to IRC Section 382 as a result of the substantialemployee stock purchase plan issuances of common stock in 2012 through 2015. Certain of the Company's net operating losses acquired in connection with the Ebyline acquisition also may be limited by IRC Section 382. The change in valuation allowance forduring the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 20152019 was an increaserecorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of $2,604,000operations as follows:
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Cost of revenue$10,152 $42,467 
Sales and marketing55,458 82,627 
General and administrative412,383 509,557 
Total stock-based compensation$477,993 $634,651 

Share Repurchase Program

On July 1, 2019, the Board authorized and $4,648,000, respectively, resulting primarilyapproved a share repurchase program under which the Company could repurchase up to $3,500,000 of its common stock from net operating losses generated duringtime to time through December 31, 2020, subject to market conditions. The Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock under the periods.share repurchase program prior to its expiration on December 31, 2020.



64

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 10.    EARNINGS (LOSS)9.    LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income or loss by the basic weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period presented. Although restricted stock is issued upon the grant of an award, the Company excludes restricted stock from the computations of weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding until such time as the stock vests. Diluted earningsloss per share is computed by dividing the net income or loss by the sum of the total of the basic weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the additional dilutive securities that could be exercised or converted into common shares during each period presented less the amount of shares that could be repurchased using the proceeds from the exercises.
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Net loss$(10,250,007)$(7,290,120)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted41,289,705 25,516,573 
Basic and diluted loss per common share$(0.25)$(0.29)
  Twelve Months Ended
  December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Net loss $(7,560,200) $(11,308,171)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted 5,380,465
 3,737,897
Basic and diluted loss per common share $(1.41) $(3.03)


The Company excluded the following weighted average items from the above computation of diluted loss per common share, as their effect would be anti-dilutive:
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Stock options1,560,828 1,222,305 
Restricted stock units980,785 281,365 
Restricted stock232,600 96,747 
Warrants6,517 73,996 
Total excluded shares2,780,730 1,674,413 


NOTE 10.    REVENUE

The Company has consistently applied its accounting policies with respect to revenue to all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements contained herein. The following table illustrates the Company’s revenue by product service type:
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Managed Services Revenue$15,987,226 $15,432,868 
Legacy Workflow Fees156,119 
Marketplace Spend Fees621,931 1,270,560 
License Fees1,507,336 1,986,285 
Other Fees213,062 109,840 
SaaS Services Revenue2,342,329 3,522,804 
Total Revenue$18,329,555 $18,955,672 
65

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

  Twelve Months Ended
  December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Stock options 889,450
 723,834
Warrants 551,867
 1,873,547
Restricted stock units 
 58,475
Total excluded shares 1,441,317
 2,655,856


The following table provides the Company’s revenues as determined by the country of domicile:

Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
United States$17,231,712 $17,358,167 
Canada1,097,843 1,597,505 
Total$18,329,555 $18,955,672 

Contract Balances

The following table provides information about receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet:
December 31,
2020
December 31, 2019
Accounts receivable, net$5,207,205 $5,596,719 
Contract liabilities (unearned revenue)$7,180,264 $6,466,766 

The increase in contract liabilities is primarily the result of the increase in fourth quarter contracts where the customers have paid in advance for services in future periods. The Company does not typically engage in contracts that are longer than one year. Therefore, the Company recognized substantially of the contract liabilities recorded at the end of the year in the following year and it did not recognize any contract assets as of December 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019. The Company does not capitalize costs to obtain its customer contracts given their general duration of less than one year, and the amounts are not material.

Contract receivables are recognized when the receipt of consideration is unconditional. Contract liabilities relate to consideration received from customers in advance of the Company satisfying performance obligations under the terms of the contracts, which will be earned in future periods. Contract liabilities increase as a result of receiving new advance payments from customers and decrease as revenue is recognized upon the Company meeting the performance obligations. As a practical expedient, the Company expenses the costs of sales commissions that are paid to its sales force associated with obtaining contracts less than 1 year in length in the period incurred.

Remaining Performance Obligations

The Company typically enters into contracts that are one year or less in length. As such, the remaining performance obligations at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are equal to the contract liabilities disclosed above. The Company expects to recognize the full balance of the unearned revenue at December 31, 2020 within the next year.



66

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 11.     RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSINCOME TAXES

In the warrant exchange transaction completed on August 14, 2015 as discussed in Note 8, the Special Situations funds, the Company's largest institutional shareholder, and Brian W. Brady, a director    The components of the Company’s net deferred income taxes are as follows (rounded):
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forwards$22,376,000 $21,425,000 
Accrued expenses281,000 177,000 
Stock option and warrant expenses474,000 462,000 
Accounts receivable38,000 28,000 
Deferred rent(6,000)
Other3,000 11,000 
Total deferred tax assets23,172,000 22,097,000 
Valuation allowance(22,950,000)(21,661,000)
Net deferred tax assets222,000 436,000 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Fixed and tangible assets(222,000)(436,000)
Total deferred tax liabilities(222,000)(436,000)
Total deferred tax assets (liabilities)$$

    The following summary reconciles differences from taxes at the federal statutory rate with the effective rate:
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Federal income tax at statutory rates(21.0)%(21)%
Change in deferred tax asset valuation allowance13.8 %21.5 %
Deferred state taxes(2.1)%(4.9)%
Non-deductible expenses:
Change in value of acquisition liability%0.4 %
Goodwill impairment9.0 %%
ISO & Restricted stock compensation(0.1)%1.3 %
Change in state & federal deferred rate0.2 %2.4 %
Other0.2 %0.3 %
Income taxes (benefit) at effective rates%%

The Company participatedhas incurred net losses for tax purposes every year since inception. At December 31, 2020, the Company had approximately $86,103,878 in net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes and $88,222,647 in net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes, which in the transaction by exercising warrants that they receivedaggregate expire in various amounts between the years of 2026 and 2040. The Company's ability to deduct its historical net operating losses may be limited in the Company's previous private placements. The Special Situations funds madefuture due to IRC Section 382 as a paymentresult of the substantial issuances of common stock in the amount of $3,414,572 in consideration for 542,858 shares2012 through 2020. Certain of the Company's common stock,net operating losses acquired in connection with the Ebyline, ZenContent, and Mr. Brady made a paymentTapInfluence acquisitions also may be limited by IRC Section 382. The change in valuation allowance for the amounttwelve months ended December 31, 2020 was an increase of $2,460,208$1,289,000, resulting primarily from net operating losses generated during the period. The change in considerationvaluation allowance for 502,940 sharesthe twelve months ended December 31, 2019 was an increase of $1,912,000, resulting primarily from net operating losses generated during the Company's common stock. The Special Situations funds and Mr. Brady exercised their warrants atperiod.



67

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the same price and on the same terms and conditions as all other warrant holders in the transaction, the negotiation of which terms was led by the Special Situations funds and other institutional shareholders. Mr. Murphy and Mr. Gardner also participated in the warrant exchange transaction and made payments of $2,741 and $179,715, respectively, in consideration for 436 and 28,572, respective shares of the Company's common stock.Consolidated Financial Statements



NOTE 12.     SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

No material events have occurred after December 31, 2016 that require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements except as follows:


On January 30, 2017,25, 2021, the Company issued 200,542entered into a new ATM Sales Agreement (the “2021 Sales Agreement”) with National Securities, pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time, through National Securities, up to $35,000,000 shares of its common stock, valuedby any method deemed to be an at-the-market offering.

From January 1, 2021 to March 26, 2021, the Company sold 8,691,391 shares at $938,532 (using the 30 trading-day volume-weightedan average closing price of IZEA's common stock of $4.68$3.95 per share asfor gross proceeds of January 30, 2017)$34,311,634 under the 2020 Sales Agreement and the 2021 Sales Agreement with National Securities. As of March 26, 2021, the Company has raised total gross proceeds of $62,766,730 pursuant to satisfy the annual guaranteed payment owed as part2020 Sales Agreement and 2021 Sales Agreement.


68

Table of the January 2015 Ebyline Stock Purchase Agreement. Such shares were issued in accordance with the exemption contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended.Contents




ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


None.




ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer,officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
 
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Furthermore, controls and procedures could be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion or two or more people or by management override of the control. Misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected on a timely basis.


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
In connection with the preparation of this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016,2020, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company'sour management including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO")principal executive officer and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO")principal financial and accounting officer to determine the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2016.2020. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016designed to provide reasonable assuranceensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submittedsubmit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Company's CEOour principal executive officer and CFO, as appropriate,principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.disclosures.


Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequateeffective internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.GAAP. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that:


(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the Company’s transactions;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of any unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect financial statement misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of internal control effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



69

Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"(“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this evaluation,assessment, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2020.


Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting is not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm and we are not required to provide an attestation report. Accordingly, BDO USA, LLP, has not issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20162020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.




ITEM 9B - OTHER INFORMATION


On January 30, 2017, we issued 200,542 sharesNone.
70

Table of common stock valued at $938,532 (using the 30 trading-day volume-weighted average closing price of IZEA's common stock of $4.68 per share as of January 30, 2017) to satisfy our annual installment payment owed as part of the January 2015 Ebyline Stock Purchase Agreement. Such shares were issued in accordance with the exemption contained in Section 4 (2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended.Contents


PART III


ITEM 10 - DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Executive Officers and Directors


The names and ages of our executive officers and directors, and their positions with us, are as follows:
NameAgePosition
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy4044Founder, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Ryan S. Schram3640President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
LeAnn C. Hitchcock4751Interim Chief Financial Officer
Brian W. Brady5862Director, Nominating Committee Chair
John H. Caron5963Director
Lindsay A. Gardner5660Director
Jill M. Golder59Director
Daniel R. Rua52Director, Compensation Committee ChairmanChair
Jill M. GolderPatrick J. Venetucci5552Director, Audit Committee Chairman
Daniel R. Rua48DirectorChair

The principal occupations for at least the past five years of each of our executive officers and directors are as follows:


Executive Officers

Edward H. (Ted) Murphy, Founder, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,founded IZEA in February 2006 as part of MindComet Corp., an interactive advertising agency that he started in 1999 and served as Chief Executive Officer. IZEA was later spun out of MindComet in September 2006.2006 and Mr. Murphy has served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of IZEA since such time. Mr. Murphy is a serial entrepreneur who is recognized as a pioneer in paid blogging and a catalyst behind the social sponsorship industry. As the Founder President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Murphy leads IZEA, both with his day-to-day operational leadership and with his strategic vision for IZEA and its products. His efforts have received recognition from media outlets including The Wall Street Journal, Wired, USA Today, Forbes, The New York Times, Business Week, PC World, CNN Money and Fortune. In addition to media coverage, Mr. Murphy has keynoted and spoken on panels at over 100 social media and financial events including SXSW, WOMMA, BlogWorld, Pubcon, and Dow Jones Venture One Summit. Mr. Murphy is a regular guest on FOX Business, CNBC and Bloomberg television. Mr. Murphy attended Florida State University before starting MindComet and several other earlier Internet-related businesses. Mr. Murphy was elected as a director based on hisbrings to the Board extensive knowledge of the social sponsorship industry knowledge and a deep background in social media, mobile technology and e-commerce, as well as significant experience in financing technology growth companies.


Ryan S. Schram, President, Chief Operating Officer and Director,joined us in September 2011 as a senior executive leading ourthe company’s operations, client development, account management, brandcorporate strategy, customer success, marketing public relationscommunications, and creator alliance organizations.talent acquisition/retention efforts and was named President in January 2021. Prior to joining us, from 2005 to 2011, Mr. Schram served in various leadership roles, most recently as Group Vice President, at ePrize, the industry leaderleading engagement marketing company, Hello World (previously ePrize). Earlier in integrated engagement marketing. Prior to that,his career, Mr. Schram held roles of increasing responsibility at CBS/Westwood One and Clear Channel Interactive.Interactive (now iHeartMedia). Mr. Schram holds a B.A.Bachelor of Arts degree in managementManagement from the Eli Broad College of Business at Michigan State University. Mr. Schram was elected as a director of IZEA due to hisjoined our Board in October 2012 and brings substantial knowledge and working experience in marketing services and client development in quicklywithin rapidly evolving industries.


LeAnn C. Hitchcock, Interim Chief Financial Officer, joined us in September 2011 as a financial consultant and was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer in August 2014. During her time2014 until she resigned on August 15, 2018. After the departure of our former chief financial officer on December 4, 2019, Ms. Hitchcock stepped back in as a consultant she assisted us with financial reporting, internal accounting controls and assistance duringserving as our quarterly reviews and annual audits.Interim Chief Financial Officer until we find a permanent replacement for the position. Prior to working with IZEA, Ms. Hitchcock worked as the Chief Financial Officer of NBI Juiceworks in 2010 and as the SEC Compliance Officer of Workstream Inc. in 2009. From 2002 to 2009, Ms. Hitchcock worked at Galaxy Nutritional Foods as its Chief Financial Officer and later as its SEC Compliance Officer until the company was sold and privatized through a tender offer in 2009. Ms. Hitchcock started her career as an auditor with Arthur Andersen and PriceWaterhouse CoopersPricewaterhouseCoopers with a strong emphasis on public companies. Ms. Hitchcock holds a Bachelor of Science degree with a double major in Accounting and Business Administration from Palm Beach Atlantic University and a Masters degree in Accounting from Florida State University.





71


Table of Contents

Directors


Brian W. Brady, Director, Nominating Committee Chairman, joined our Board of Directors in August 2012. SinceFrom 1995 to December 2019, Mr. Brady has beenwas the President and Chief Executive Officer of Northwest Broadcasting, Inc., and Chairman of Bryson Holdings LLC. Collectively, these companies own and operate 15 television stations in nine markets. Mr. Brady has also been the President of Eagle Creek Broadcasting, which owns and operates a CBS affiliate in Laredo, Texas, since 2002. Mr. Brady currently serves on the board of Syncbak, a privately held technology company, Terrier Media, SumTV, iPowow International, Layer3TV and TV4 Entertainment. Mr. Brady is also one of three senior advisors for ManhattenManhattan West Asset Management, an independent wealth management and high net worth financial advisory firm. Mr. Brady previously served on the FOX Affiliate Board for nine years, serving as Chairman for four of those years. He also previously served on the Board of Directorsboard of the National Association of Broadcasting (8 years), Saga Communication (9 years) and the Ferris State College Foundation Board (7 years). Mr. Brady holds a B.S.Bachelor of Science degree in advertising from Ferris State University. Mr. Brady was electedbrings to serve as a member of our Board of Directors due to his more than 25 years of experience in the multi-media industry, making his input invaluable to us as we expand our portfolio of customers and platform offerings.


John H. Caron, Director, joined our Board of Directors in April 2015. Mr. Caron has 2730+ years of marketing experience in the consumer packaged goods and restaurant industries. Since May 2017, Mr. Caron is currentlyhas served as Vice President and a director of Entrepreneurs in Action, Inc., a Florida benefit corporation, which, among other things, will be the Manager of one or more funds to invest in early-stage and start-up social enterprises. Mr. Caron has also served as an independent director on the board of Tijuana Flats an independent directorsince November 2015 and currently serves as its Chairman, sits on the board of Thrive Frozen Nutrition, Inc. since April 2014, and since 2013, aon the board member forof venVelo, a Central Florida early-stage venture fund.fund, since May 2013. Prior to joining our Board, Mr. Caron was also a member of our Strategic Advisory Board since June 2013. Mr. Caron served as the President of Olive Garden at Darden Restaurants Inc. from May 2011 to January 2013, Darden'sDarden’s Chief Marketing Officer from March 2010 to May 2011 and Darden'sDarden’s Executive Vice President of Marketing for Olive Garden from 2003 to 2010. As a member of Darden's Executive Operating Team, Mr. Caron led brand growth strategy across the enterprise to help ensure each Darden brand was appropriately positioned and had clearly identified plans in place to drive sustainable growth. Before joining Darden Restaurants, Mr. Caron served as Vice President and General Manager of Lipton Beverages for Unilever Bestfoods North America from 2000 to 2002. Mr. Caron received a Bachelor'sBachelor of Science degree in Political Science from The Colorado College and a Master'sMasters degree in American Politics from New York University Department of Politics. Mr. Caron also earned an MBAa Masters in Business Administration in Marketing from New York University Stern School of Business. Mr. Caron was elected to serve as a member of the Board of Directors due to hisCaron’s decades of experience in leading and managing marketing and branding operations in highly competitive industries.industries position him well to serve on our Board.


Lindsay A. Gardner, Director, joined our Board of Directors in December 2013. Mr. Gardner has 2530 years of executive management and leadership experience at companies ranging from technology startups to the world’s largest media and entertainment companies. Currently,Until August 2020, Mr. Gardner servesserved as Senior Vice President and Chief Content Officer of T-Mobile, the nation’s third-largest wireless company, where he spearheaded the company’s entry into video. Previously, he was the Chief Content Officer of Layer3TV, the first new cable operator to launch in the U.S. in a decade. Mr. Gardner joined Layer3TV in January 2015 and is alsoled its commercial launch and subsequent sale to T-Mobile. Prior to that, Mr. Gardener was a Senior Advisor to Oaktree Capital Management, a Los Angeles-based private equity firm with $100 billion under management. Sincemanagement where, beginning in May 2010, he has focused on global buyout opportunities in the media sector. From 2007-2010,2007 to 2010, Mr. Gardner was a partner of New York-based MediaTech Capital Partners. From 1999 until mid-2007, Mr. Gardner led distribution, sales and marketing for Fox Networks today the most diverse, powerful and profitable US cable channel operator. During his tenure, he built Fox’s cable network portfolio from a handful of small networks into one of the industry’s largest and most diverse. Mr. Gardner currently serves on the board of directors for the Courage Campaign Institute.as President, Distribution. Mr. Gardner received an M.B.A.MBA from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a B.A.Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Brandeis University. Mr. Gardner was elected to serve as a member of the Board of Directors due to his significant experience in the media, technology and entertainment industries, as both an executive and a private equity investor.


Jill M. Golder, Director, joinedrejoined our Board in February 2021 and was previously a member of IZEA’s Board of Directors from May 2015.2015 to September 2019. Ms. Golder has almost 30 years of finance, accounting and corporate governance experience and has served in numerous leadership roles at Fortune 500 companies. Ms. Golder is currentlywas most recently the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., which she joined infrom April 2016.2016 to December 2020. She was previously employed at Ruby Tuesday, Inc. from April 2013 to April 2016 where she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for two years and as Senior Vice President for one year.Officer. Prior to joining Ruby Tuesday, Ms. Golder served as Chief Financial Officer for Cooper's Hawk Winery & Restaurants from 2012 to 2013.Restaurants. Prior to her tenure at Cooper’s Hawk Winery & Restaurants, Ms. Golder spent 23 years at Darden Restaurants, holding progressively more responsible positions in finance including Senior Vice President of Finance for Olive Garden, Smokey Bones, Specialty Restaurant Group and Red Lobster.. Ms. Golder has also served as Director of Strategic Planning and Corporate Analysis for Domino's Pizza International from 1994 to 1995 and she earlier served as a Manager of Finance at Walt Disney World. Ms. GolderLobster. She serves on the UniversityBoard of Tennessee Economics Advisory Council. She also serves on the Advisory Board for BarFly Ventures.Directors and Audit Committee member of ABM Industries, Inc. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in Economics at Kalamazoo College and a Masters degree in Business Administration from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Ms. Golder was electedbrings to serve as a member of theour Board of Directors due to her extensive knowledge of complex financial, accounting and operational issues highly relevant to our business.


Daniel R. Rua, Director, Compensation Committee Chairman, rejoined our Board of Directors in July 2012. Since November 2015, Mr. Rua has served as the CEOChief Executive Officer of Admiral, a private SaaS company that provides advanced adblock analayticsvisitor relationship management and advertising revenue recovermarketing automation for onlinedigital publishers. From September 2006 to May 2011, Mr. Rua served as the
72

Executive Chairman and an early investor in our predecessor entity IZEA Innovations, Inc. Mr. Rua has been a Managing Partner of Inflexion Partners, an early-stage venture capital fund, since January 2002. Prior to Inflexion, Mr. Rua was a Partner with Draper Atlantic, the east coast fund of Silicon Valley’s early-stage venture firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson, from 1999 to 2002. Prior to Draper Atlantic, Mr. Rua led internetInternet protocol development at IBM’s Networking Labs in the Research Triangle, from 1991 to 1999. Mr. Rua is a former director of InphoMatch (acquired by Sybase) and AuctionRover (acquired by Overture/Yahoo), and serves other board and operating roles as part of his technology investing.. Mr. Rua holds a B.S.Bachelor of Science degree in computer engineering from the University of Florida. He also earned a J.D.Juris Doctor from the University of North Carolina School of Law and an M.B.A.a Masters in Business Administration from the Kenan-Flagler Business School of the University of North Carolina. Mr. Rua was elected to serve as a member of our Board of Directors due to hisRua’s extensive knowledge of our products and services as a director and early investor in our predecessor, as well as his many years of experience in venture capital investing and operational leadership of other technology growth companies.companies, position him well to serve on our Board.


All directors hold office untilPatrick J. Venetucci, Director, Audit Committee Chairman, joined our Board in December 2018. Since 2018, Mr. Venetucci has served as Chief Executive Officer of MERGE, a private equity-backed company that merges creative, technology and media solutions for clients in the next annual meetinghealth, financial services and consumer industries. From 2016 to 2018,Mr. Venetucci was the President of stockholdersUSA Operations and the election and qualification of their successors. Officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretionIntegration for Dentsu Aegis Network, one of the largest holding companies in the advertising industry. In 2013, Mr. Venetucci founded the MobileAngelo Group, a technology investment and consulting firm where he initiated a global mobile roll-up capitalized by private equity and other ventures in technology that enable digital transformation, and served as its Chief Executive Officer until 2016. From 1990 to 2013, Mr. Venetucci worked for Leo Burnett Worldwide, a global advertising network, serving as its President of Global Operations from 2009 to 2013. In this capacity, he was responsible for growing large global accounts and leading global corporate functions such as corporate strategy, Mergers and Acquisitions, enterprise technology, internal audit, procurement, and production. Before this, Mr. Venetucci was Leo Burnett’s Global Head of Human Resources where he chaired the executive compensation committee. Earlier in his career at Leo Burnett, he spent over a decade developing fully-integrated marketing campaigns for several Fortune 500 clients, and worked at Leo Burnett Tokyo for three years, where he started the company’s first digital marketing service. Mr. Venetucci has served as an advisor to several innovative public and private technology companies, including Solstice Mobile, Signal, ParqEx, and Quiver, as well as to private equity firms. Mr. Venetucci has a Masters in Business Administration in Finance and in Marketing and Entrepreneurship from the University of Chicago and a Bachelor of Arts in Communications Studies from the University of Iowa. Mr. Venetucci’s extensive knowledge of the advertising industry as well as knowledge of financial and operational issues positions him well to serve on our Board.


Family Relationships


There are no family relationships among our directorsexecutive officers and executive officers.directors.


Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings


To our knowledge, during the past ten years, none of our directors, executive officers, promoters, control persons or nominees has been:
 
the subject of any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
convicted in a criminal proceeding or is subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or
found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading SECCommission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law.


Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Prior to February 25, 2016,of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own greatermore than 10% of our outstanding shares (“Reporting Persons”) were not requiredcommon stock to file initial reports of ownership with respect to our equity securities and reports of changes in such ownership with the SEC. Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) ownership reports, because our shares were not yet registered pursuant to Section 12(b) or Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.forms they file. Based onsolely upon our review of formsthe copies of the reports that we received orand written representations from reporting persons stating that theyno other reports were not required, to file these forms, we are not awarebelieve that any officer, director or 10% or greater stockholder failed to file on a timely basis, reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, all Section16(a) filings were made in a timely manner.


73

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the members of our Compensation Committee were Lindsay A. Gardner, Daniel R. Rua and Patrick J. Venetucci with Mr. Rua serving as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. None of the directors who served on our Compensation Committee in 2020 served as one of our employees in 2020 or has ever served as one of our officers. During 2020, none of our executive officers served as a director or member of a compensation committee (or other than Ms. Golder, who failed to timely file one Form 4 (filed with the SEC on May 19, 2016) due to technical difficulties.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all our directors, officers (including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and any personcommittee performing similar functions) and employees. We have madeof any other entity of which an executive officer served on our codeBoard of business conduct and ethicsDirectors or Compensation Committee.

Board Committees

Our Board has three active standing committees to assist it with its responsibilities. Below, we describe the three committees, the charters of which are available on our website at https://izea.com.

Corporate Governance

Our Board of Directors held 13 meetings during 2016. Each director then serving attended 75% or more of the aggregate of: (1) the total number of Board meetings, and (2) the total number of meetings of the committee(s) of which he or

she is a member, if any. We do not have a written policy on board attendance at annual meetings of stockholders; however, we intend to schedule a Board meeting immediately after an annual meeting for which directors attending receive compensation.
We have established an audit committee, compensation committee and nominating committee. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for each of the audit committee, the compensation committee, and the nominating committee, which are reviewed at least yearly by each of the committees. You can find links to these materials in the corporate governance section of Neither our website at https://izea.com. The information contained on the website is notnor its contents are incorporated by reference in, or considered to be a part of,into this Form 10-K.Annual Report.

Audit Committee. The audit committee'sAudit Committee’s duties are to recommend to the Board of Directors the engagement of independent auditors to audit our financial statements and to review our accounting policies and financial statements. The audit committeeAudit Committee is responsible to reviewfor reviewing the scope and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by our independent public accountants, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The audit committee wouldAudit Committee will at all times to be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the Board, of Directors, free from any relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.


     The Audit Committee is comprised of three non-employee directors: Jill M. Golder, John H. Caron, and Daniel R. Rua.Rua, and Patrick J. Venetucci. Mr. Venetucci serves as the audit committee chairperson and is designated as the “audit committee financial expert” based on his experience as an executive officer of multiple international companies, service on a compensation committee and graduate degree in finance. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are “independent” as that term is currently defined in Rule 5605 of the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock MarketMarketplace Rule 4200(a)(15) and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Ms. Golder serves as the audit committee chairman and is designated as the “audit committee financial expert" based on her nearly 30 years of finance, accounting and corporate governance experience. The Audit Committee met telephonically foursix times at regularly scheduled meetings during the year ended December 31, 2016.2020.


Compensation Committee.Committee. The compensation committeeCompensation Committee is tasked with reviewing and approving our compensation policies, including compensation of executive officers. The compensation committee wouldCompensation Committee is also reviewcharged with reviewing and administeradministering our equity incentive compensation plans, and recommendrecommending and approveapproving grants of stock options or other awards under that plan.


The Compensation Committee is comprised of three non-employee directors:directors, Lindsay A. Gardner, John H. Caron and Daniel R. Rua.Rua, and Patrick J. Venetucci. The Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are “independent” as that term is currently defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15) and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Mr. GardnerRua serves as the compensation committee chairman.chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met as needed as part of the 12 regularly scheduled Board meetingsfive times telephonically during the year ended December 31, 2016.2020, in addition to performing multiple actions through written consents.


NominatingNominations and Corporate Governance Committee. The purpose of the nominating committeeNominations and Corporate Governance Committee is to select, or recommend for our entire Board'sBoard’s selection, the individuals to stand for election as directors at the annual meeting of stockholders and to oversee the selection and composition of committees of our Board. The nominating committee'sNominations and Corporate Governance Committee’s duties also include considering the adequacy of our corporate governance and overseeing and approving management continuity planning processes. Our entire Board performsThe Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee is comprised of all of our non-employee directors: Brian W. Brady, John H. Caron, Lindsay A. Gardner, Jill M. Golder, Daniel R. Rua, and Patrick J. Venetucci. Mr. Brady serves as the duties and responsibilities requiredchairman of the nominating committee.Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee met one time during the year ended December 31, 2020 to amend its committee charter and took action by written consent on one occasion.


While we do not have a formal diversity policy for Board membership, the Board does seek to ensure that its membership consists of sufficiently diverse backgrounds, meaning a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions. In considering candidates for the Board, the independent directors consider, among other factors, diversity with respect to viewpoints, skills, experience and other demographics.


Director Independence
74


The BoardTable of Directors has determined that John H. Caron, Lindsay A. Gardner, Jill M. Golder and Daniel R. Rua are “independent,” as independence is defined in the listing standards for the Nasdaq Stock Market. Accordingly, four of our seven directors are independent.Contents

Board Leadership Structure


Edward H. (Ted)Mr. Murphy has been our Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer since 2006 when he founded IZEA. We believe that having one person, particularly Mr. Murphy with his deep industry and executive management experience, his extensive knowledge of the operations of IZEA and his own history of innovation and strategic thinking, serveserving as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is the best leadership structure for IZEA because it demonstrates to employees, customers and stockholders that we are under strong leadership, with a single personleadership. Mr. Schram has been our Chief Operating Officer since 2011 and was named President in January 2021. This continuity and small base of individuals setting the tone and having primary responsibility for managing our operations. Thisoperations provides unity of leadership and promotes strategy development and execution,

timely decision-making and effective management of company resources. We believe that we have been well servedwell-served by this structure.

FourSix of our seveneight directors are independent.independent within the meaning of SEC and Nasdaq rules. In addition, all of the directors on each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and CompensationNominations and Corporate Governance Committee are independent directors and each of these committees is led by aan independent committee chair. The committee chairs set the agendas for their committees and report to the full Board on their work. We do not have aMr. Brady serves as the lead independent director but,of the board of directors and, as required by Nasdaq, our independent directors meet in executive session without management present as frequently as they deem appropriate, typically at the time of each regular in-person Board meeting. All of the independent directors are highly accomplished and experienced business people in their respective fields, who have demonstrated leadership in significant enterprises and are familiar with board processes. Our independent directors bring experience, oversight, and expertise from outside the company and industry, while Mr.Messrs. Murphy Mr.and Schram and Ms. Hitchcock bring company-specific experience and expertise.


Board Role in Risk Oversight


While the Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing our risk management, the Board has delegated many of these functions to the Audit Committee. Under its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for discussing with management and the independent auditors our major financial risk exposures, the guidelines and policies by which risk assessment and management is undertaken, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control risk exposure. In addition to the Audit Committee’s work in overseeing risk management, the full Board regularly engages in discussions of the most significant risks that we are facing and how those risks are being managed, and the Board receives reports on risk management from our senior officers and from the chair of the Audit Committee. In addition, Mr. Murphy’s extensive knowledge of IZEA uniquely qualifies him to lead the Board in assessing risks. The Board of Directors believes that the work undertaken by the Audit Committee, the full Board and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, enables the Board to effectively oversee the IZEA’sour risk management function.



Code of Business Conduct and Ethics



We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all our directors, officers (including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and any person performing similar functions) and employees. We have made our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics available on our website at https://izea.com. Amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or any grant of a waiver from a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules will also be disclosed on our website.


75

ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Summary Compensation Table


The following table sets forth the cash compensation, as well as certain other compensation earned during the last two fiscal years, for (i) each person who served as our principal executive officer (“PEO”) during the year ended December 31, 2016;2020; (ii) each person who served as our principal financial officer (“PFO”) during the year ended December 31, 2016; and (iii) up to two other most highly compensated executive officers other than the PEO or the PFO who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 20162020; and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to the foregoing clause (ii) but for the fact that such individuals were not serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2020 (collectively referred to as the “Named Executive Officers”):
Name and Principal PositionYear Salary BonusStock Awards
Option Awards (1)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (2)
 All Other Compen-sation (3)
 Total
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy(4)
2020$269,424 $— $61,790 $227,010 $66,572 $814 $625,610 
Chief Executive Officer2019$243,547 $— $195,597 $183,299 $118,604 $814 $741,861 
Ryan S. Schram (5)
2020$259,075 $— $65,721 $2,161 $170,392 $305 $497,654 
Chief Operating Officer2019$259,784 $— $6,124 $8,758 $128,415 $305 $403,386 
LeAnn C. Hitchcock (6)
2020$267,639 $— $— $— $— $— $267,639 
Interim Chief Financial Officer2019$70,624 $— $— $— $— $— $70,624 
Name and Principal PositionYear
 Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
Stock Awards ($)Option Awards ($) (1)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen-sation ($)Non-qualified Deferred Compen-sation Earnings ($)
 All Other Compen-sation
($) (2)
 Total
($)
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy2016232,942
79,842

168,541


1,027
482,352
President and Chief Executive Officer2015228,375
247,335

206,829


1,035
683,574
Ryan S. Schram2016248,572
164,908

38,929



452,409
Chief Operating Officer2015243,600
139,761

30,071



413,432
LeAnn C. Hitchcock2016202,250
16,698





218,948
Chief Financial Officer2015185,000
16,706

40,780



242,486
_______________
_________________
(1) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options issued during the year as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See "Critical“Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates"Estimates” under "Management’s“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” for additional information, including valuation assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the awards.
(2)Represents insurance premiums paid by IZEA with respect to life insurance for the benefit of the Named Executive Officer.


(2)     Bonus amounts paid in 2020 and 2019 consisted of incentive compensation payable pursuant to each individual’s employment agreement are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)     Represents insurance premiums paid by IZEA with respect to life insurance for the benefit of the Named Executive Officer.
(4)    For the year ended December 31, 2019, Mr. Murphy was awarded cash bonuses totaling $118,604, restricted stock units valued at $159,170, restricted stock valued at $36,427, and stock options with a fair value of $183,299 pursuant to quarterly and annual performance bonus awards granted in his employment agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Mr. Murphy was awarded cash bonuses totaling $66,572, restricted stock units valued at $61,790, and stock options with a fair value of $227,010 pursuant to quarterly and annual performance bonus awards granted in his employment agreement. See Employment Agreements below for details on Mr. Murphy's total compensation plan.
(5)    For the year ended December 31, 2019, Mr. Schram was awarded cash bonuses totaling $128,415, restricted stock valued at $6,124, and stock options with a fair value of $8,758 pursuant to quarterly and annual performance bonus awards granted in his employment agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Mr. Schram was awarded cash bonuses totaling $170,392, restricted stock units valued at $65,721, and stock options with a fair value of $2,161 pursuant to quarterly and annual performance bonus awards granted in his employment agreement. See Employment Agreements below for details on Mr. Schram's total compensation plan.
(6)    Ms. Hitchcock was appointed as our Interim Chief Financial Officer effective December 9, 2019.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End


Listed below is information with respect to unexercised options and equity incentive awards held by each Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 20162020 pursuant to our equity incentive plans:


  Option Awards
Name 
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
(#)
 
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options:
Unexercisable (#)
 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) 
Option Exercise Price  
($) (1)
 Option Expiration Date
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy  (2) 6,250
 
  $120.00
 5/25/2017
President and Chief Executive Officer 3,134
 
  $120.00
 5/25/2017
  25,000
 
  $5.00
 3/1/2023
  9,384
 
  $5.00
 3/1/2023
  195,892
 24,057
  $5.00
 8/15/2023
  48,715
 22,143
  $7.30
 9/9/2019
  26,732
 13,268
  $5.20
 12/26/2024
  3,194
 4,106
  $7.80
 4/1/2025
  1,166
 1,942
  $8.40
 7/1/2025
  1,033
 2,274
  $8.00
 10/1/2025
  10,126
 27,262
  $7.80
 11/30/2025
  1,556
 6,741
  $6.91
 3/30/2026
  808
 4,731
  $5.75
 5/16/2026
  672
 7,386
  $7.22
 8/16/2026
  525
 5,774
  $4.72
 11/17/2026
  833
 39,167
  $4.75
 11/30/2026
           
Ryan S. Schram (3) 3,125
 
  $120.00
 5/25/2017
Chief Operating Officer 625
 
  $120.00
 5/25/2017
  5,000
 
  $5.00
 3/1/2023
  3,750
 
  $5.00
 3/1/2023
  7,333
 2,667
  $5.40
 5/20/2019
  29,688
 7,812
  $6.80
 11/3/2018
  3,334
 3,333
  $5.60
 1/2/2025
  532
 685
  $7.80
 4/1/2025
  192
 319
  $8.40
 7/1/2025
  175
 385
  $8.00
 10/1/2025
  1,589
 4,766
  $7.60
 1/1/2026
  259
 1,124
  $6.91
 3/30/2026
  135
 788
  $5.75
 5/16/2026
  112
 1,231
  $7.22
 8/16/2026
  88
 962
  $4.72
 11/17/2026
           
LeAnn C. Hitchcock (4) 125
 
  $72.00
 6/8/2017
Chief Financial Officer 125
 
  $5.00
 3/1/2023
  3,667
 1,333
  $5.40
 5/20/2019
  11,667
 8,333
  $8.00
 8/25/2019
  2,708
 7,292
  $8.00
 12/1/2025
_________________
(1)Unless otherwise indicated, the option exercise price represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.Option Awards

(2)On May 25, 2012, Mr. Murphy received a non-qualified option to purchase 6,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $120 per share (110% of the closing stock price on such date). This option vested as to 1,563 shares on May 25, 2013 and vests approximately 130 shares per month thereafter. Additionally, on May 25, 2012, Mr. Murphy received a non-qualified option to purchase 3,134 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $120 per share (110% of the closing stock price on such date) expiring on May 25, 2017. This option vested immediately on May 25, 2012 as to 2,351 shares and vests in equal monthly installments of approximately 3,132 shares thereafter. On March 1, 2013, Mr. Murphy received an incentive stock option to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock, vesting in equal monthly installments of approximately 694 shares over the three years following the grant date. Additionally, on March 1, 2013, Mr. Murphy received an incentive stock option to purchase 9,384 shares of common stock. The option vested 100% after one year on March 1, 2014. In connection with our 2013 private placement, Mr. Murphy received a non-qualified stock option to purchase 219,949 shares of common stock. The option vested immediately as to 54,987 shares (25%) and vests in equal monthly installments of approximately 3,437 shares over four years. On September 9, 2014, Mr. Murphy received a non-qualified stock option to purchase 70,858 shares of common stock. The option vested immediately as to 7,381 shares and the remainder vests in equal monthly installments of approximately 1,476 shares over 43 months following the grant date. On December 26, 2014, Mr. Murphy received a non-qualified stock option to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock. The option vested immediately as to 6,000 shares and the remainder vests in equal monthly monthly installments of approximately 829 shares over 41 months following the grant date. As a result of quarterly bonus awards based on Key Performance Indicators, Mr. Murphy received incentive stock options on April 1, 2015, July 1, 2015 and October 1, 2015 totaling 13,715 shares. These options vest in equal monthly installments over four years and expire ten years after the grant date as indicated in the chart. Pursuant to his employment agreement, on November 30, 2015, Mr. Murphy received a non-qualified stock option to purchase 37,388 shares of common stock vesting in equal monthly installments of approximately 779 shares over four years following the grant date. As a result of quarterly and annual bonus awards based on Key Performance Indicators, Mr. Murphy received incentive stock options on March 30, 2016, May 16, 2016, August 16, 2016 and November 17, 2016 totaling 28,193 shares. These options vest in equal monthly installments over four years and expire ten years after the grant date as indicated in the chart. Pursuant to his employment agreement, on November 30, 2016, Mr. Murphy received a non-qualified stock option to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock vesting in equal monthly installments of approximately 833 shares over four years following the grant date.
(3)On May 25, 2012, Mr. Schram received a non-qualified option to purchase 3,125 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $120 per share (110% of the closing stock price on such date) expiring on May 25, 2017. This option vested as to 781 shares on May 25, 2013 and vests approximately 65 shares per month thereafter. Additionally, on May 25, 2012 Mr. Schram received a non-qualified option to purchase 625 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $120 per share (110% of the closing stock price on such date) expiring on May 25, 2017. This option vested as to 156 shares on June 30, 2012 and vests in equal monthly installments of approximately 13 shares thereafter. On March 1, 2013, Mr. Schram received an incentive stock option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock, vesting in equal installments of approximately 139 shares per month over three years from the grant date. Additionally, on March 1, 2013, Mr. Schram received an incentive stock option to purchase 3,750 shares of common stock. The option vested 100% after one year on March 1, 2014. On May 20, 2013, Mr. Schram received an incentive stock option to purchase 10,000 shares, vesting in equal monthly installments of approximately 167 shares over five years following the grant date. On November 3, 2013, Mr. Schram received a non-qualified stock option to purchase 37,500 shares of common stock. The option vested as to 9,375 shares on November 3, 2014 and vests approximately 781 shares per month thereafter. Pursuant to his employment agreement, on January 1, 2015, Mr. Schram received an incentive stock option to purchase 6,667 shares of common stock vesting in equal monthly installments of approximately 139 shares over four years following the grant date. As a result of quarterly bonus awards based on Key Performance Indicators, Mr. Schram received incentive stock options on April 1, 2015, July 1, 2015 and October 1, 2015 totaling 2,288 shares. These options vest in equal monthly installments over four years and expire ten years after the grant date as indicated in the chart. Pursuant to his employment agreement, on January 1, 2016, Mr. Schram received an incentive stock option to purchase 6,355 shares of common stock vesting in equal monthly installments of approximately 132 shares over four years following the grant date. As a result of quarterly and annual bonus awards based on Key Performance Indicators, Mr. Schram received incentive stock options on March 30, 2016, May 16, 2016, August 16, 2016 and November 17, 2016 totaling 4,699 shares. These options vest in equal monthly installments over four years and expire ten years after the grant date as indicated in the chart.
(4)On June 8, 2012, Ms. Hitchcock received a non-qualified stock option to purchase 125 shares of common stock. This option vested as to 31 shares on June 8, 2013 and vests approximately 3 shares per month thereafter. On March 1, 2013, Ms. Hitchcock received a non-qualified stock option to purchase 125 shares of common stock. The option vested 100% after one year on March 1, 2014. On May 20, 2013, Ms. Hitchcock received a non-qualified stock option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock, vesting in equal monthly installments of approximately 83 shares over five years. On August 25, 2014, Ms. Hitchcock received an option to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock. The

76

NameNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options:
Exercisable
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options:
Unexercisable
Option Exercise Price (1)
Option Expiration Date
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy25,000 — $5.00 3/1/2023
Chief Executive Officer9,384 — $5.00 3/1/2023
219,949 — $5.00 8/15/2023
40,000 — $5.20 12/26/2024
7,300 — $7.80 4/1/2025
3,108 — $8.40 7/1/2025
3,307 — $8.00 10/1/2025
37,388 — $7.80 11/30/2025
8,297 — $6.91 3/30/2026
5,539 — $5.75 5/16/2026
8,058 — $7.22 8/16/2026
6,299 — $4.72 11/17/2026
40,000 — $4.75 11/30/2026
13,359 890 (4)$4.20 3/31/2027
10,649 1,238 (4)$2.75 5/12/2027
586 27,527 (2)$1.95 8/14/2027
30,833 9,167 (3)$4.65 11/30/2027
8,150 4,470 (2)$1.34 6/5/2028
10,954 7,825 (2)$1.10 8/16/2028
4,480 4,121 (2)$1.46 11/16/2028
20,833 19,167 (3)$1.33 11/30/2028
87,500 112,500 (3)$1.06 4/23/2029
16,225 14,518 (5)$0.65 5/14/2029
25,517 31,897 (5)$0.42 8/14/2029
70,834 129,166 (3)$0.31 8/27/2029
50,000 150,000 (5)$0.17 4/1/2030
19,479 167,521 (3)$1.26 8/27/2030
Ryan S. Schram5,000 — $5.00 3/1/2023
Chief Operating Officer3,750 — $5.00 3/1/2023
6,667 — $5.60 1/1/2025
1,217 — $7.80 4/1/2025
511 — $8.40 7/1/2025
560 — $8.00 10/1/2025
6,355 — $7.60 1/1/2026
1,383 — $6.91 3/30/2026
923 — $5.75 5/16/2026
1,343 — $7.22 8/16/2026
1,050 — $4.72 11/17/2026
6,667 — (3)$4.51 1/1/2027
2,227 148 (2)$4.20 3/31/2027
2,211 201 (2)$2.75 5/12/2027
89 4,166 (2)$1.95 8/14/2027
5,000 1,667 (3)$4.52 1/1/2028
1,810 992 (2)$1.34 6/5/2028
1,891 1,350 (2)$1.10 8/16/2028
325 299 (2)$1.46 11/16/2028
3,334 3,333 (3)$0.98 1/1/2029
2,576 3,933 (2)$0.65 5/14/2029
3,190 6,379 (2)$0.42 8/14/2029
1,667 5,000 (3)$0.24 1/1/2030
1,250 5,417 (2)$0.17 4/1/2030
77

LeAnn C. Hitchcock125 — $5.00 3/1/2023
Interim Chief Financial Officer— 

(1)Unless otherwise indicated, the option vestsexercise price represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant or the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day prior to the grant date if the grant date falls on a non-trading day. Each of these grants has a ten-year term, indicating that the grant date was 10 years prior to the indicated Option Expiration Date.
(2)Represents the unvested portion of annual or quarterly bonus awards granted in accordance with the officer’s employment agreement based on achievement of certain key performance indicators set at the beginning of each year, vesting in equal monthly installments over four years subsequent to the grant date.
(3)Represents the unvested portion of annual stock options granted pursuant to an employment agreement and vesting in equal monthly installments over four years subsequent to the grant date.
(4)As a result of quarterly and annual bonus awards granted in accordance with the officer’s employment agreement based on achievement of certain key performance indicators set at the beginning of each year, Mr. Murphy received incentive stock options on March 31, 2017 and May 12, 2017, totaling 26,136 shares. These options were subject to the approval of an increase in shares in our Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved on June 21, 2017. These options vested as to 5,0001,139 shares (25%) one year afteron June 30, 2017. The remainder of the issuance date and the remainder inincentive stock options granted on March 31, 2017 vest over 45 equal monthly installments of approximately 417297 shares overthereafter, and the following three years. On December 1, 2015, Ms. Hitchcock received anremainder of the incentive stock option to purchase 10,000options granted on May 12, 2017 vest over 27 equal monthly installments of approximately 248 shares thereafter.
(5)Represents the unvested portion of common stock,annual or quarterly bonus awards granted in accordance with the officer’s employment agreement based on achievement of certain key performance indicators set at the beginning of each year, vesting in equal monthly installments of approximately 208 shares over fourthree years followingsubsequent to the grant date.


Listed below is information with respect to unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units held by each Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2020 pursuant to our equity incentive plans:
Stock Awards
NameEquity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not VestedEquity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy(1)469 $854 
Chief Executive Officer(1)1,729 $3,147 
(1)7,209 $13,120 
(2)58,327 $106,155 
(2)166,827 $303,625 
(2)49,140 $89,435 
(2)11,592 $21,097 
(2)13,826 $25,163 
(2)25,228 $45,915 
Ryan S. Schram(3)110 $200 
Chief Operating Officer(3)288 $524 
(3)1,290 $2,348 
(3)2,571 $4,679 
(4)63,756 $116,036 
(4)100,000 $182,000 
(4)25,389 $46,208 
(4)2,800 $5,096 
(4)2,451 $4,461 
(4)4,278 $7,786 
LeAnn C. Hitchcock— $— 
Interim Chief Financial Officer
78


(1)We issued 2,812 shares and 7,543 shares of restricted stock to Mr. Murphy for his second and third quarter 2017 performance bonus on August 14, 2017 and November 9, 2017, respectively. The stock was initially valued at $36,411 and vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months after issuance. On May 3, 2018, we issued 21,628 shares of restricted stock for Mr. Murphy’s 2017 annual performance bonus. The stock was initially valued at $46,715 and vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months after issuance. As of December 31, 2020, 9,407 issued shares of restricted stock are unvested with a total market value of $17,121 based on the closing stock price of $1.82 on December 31, 2020.
(2)All restricted stock units convert to an equal number common stock shares upon vesting. On May 17, 2019, we issued 131,235 restricted stock units for Mr. Murphy’s 2019 stock bonus award under his employment agreement. The stock was initially valued at $76,510 and vests in equal monthly installments over 36 months after issuance. On August 29, 2019, we issued 258,312 restricted stock units for Mr. Murphy’s annual stock bonus award under his employment agreement. The stock was initially valued at $82,660 and vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months after issuance. On April 3, 2020, May 31, 2020, August 31, 2020 and November 30, 2020, we issued 65,531, 14918, 16,072 and 26,707 restricted stock units, respectively, for Mr. Murphy’s 2019 annual stock bonus award and his 2020 quarterly stock bonus awards under his employment agreement. The stock was initially valued at $10,138, $9,097, $18,161 and $24,394 and vests in equal monthly installments over 36 months after issuance. As of December 31, 2020, 324,940 restricted stock units are unvested with a total market value of $591,391 based on the closing stock price of $1.82 on December 31, 2020.
(3)We issued 662 shares and 1,257 shares of restricted stock on August 14, 2017 and November 9, 2017, respectively, to Mr. Schram for his second and third quarter 2017 performance bonus. The stock was initially valued at $6,446 and vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months after issuance. On May 3, 2018, we issued 3,870 shares of restricted stock for Mr. Schram’s 2017 annual performance bonus. The stock was initially valued at $8,360 and vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months after issuance. On March 28, 2019, we issued 4,570 shares of restricted stock for Mr. Schram’s 2018 annual performance bonus. The stock was initially valued at $6,124 and vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months after issuance. As of December 31, 2020, 4,259 issued shares of restricted stock are unvested with a total market value of $7,751 based on the closing stock price of $1.82 on December 31, 2020.
(4)All restricted stock units convert to an equal number common stock shares upon vesting. On January 3, 2020, we issued 100,000 restricted stock units as a one-time bonus award to Mr. Schram. The stock was initially valued at $27,930 and has a cliff vesting one year from issuance. On January 3, 2020, we issued 84,994 restricted stock units for Mr. Schram’s annual stock bonus award under his employment agreement. The stock was initially valued at $23,739 and vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months after issuance. On April 3, 2020, May 31, 2020, August 31, 2020 and November 30, 2020, we issued 31,271, 3,347, 2,730 and 4,476 restricted stock units, respectively, for Mr. Schram’s 2019 annual stock bonus award and his 2020 quarterly stock bonus awards under his employment agreement. The stock was initially valued at $4,838, $2,041, $3,085 and $4,088 and vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months after issuance. As of December 31, 2020, 198,674 restricted stock units are unvested with a total market value of $361,587 based on the closing stock price of $1.82 on December 31, 2020.
Employment Agreements


The following is a summary of the employment arrangements with our Named Executive Officers.

Edward H. (Ted) Murphy. On December 26, 2014, the Board of Directors signed a newan employment agreement (the “Previous Employment Agreement”) with Edward H. (Ted) Murphy with an initial term commencing on December 1, 2014 and ending on November 30, 2017.2017, auto-renewing for successive one-year periods if no termination notice is provided. Pursuant to the employment agreement,Previous Employment Agreement, Mr. Murphy will receivereceived an annual base salary of $225,000 with a guaranteed base salary increase of no less than 2% in April of each year and annual stock options with a fair value of $150,000 vesting over four years in equal monthly installments. However, the numberinstallments, subject to a maximum of 40,000 underlying shares of common stock shall not exceed 40,000 shares. In the event that the fair market value of the stock option grant iswas less than $150,000, as limited by the 40,000 share cap, Mr. Murphy will bewas entitled to receive either 50% of the difference in fair market value in cash or 100% of the value in Restricted Stock Unitsshares of restricted stock with the same vesting schedule as the stock options, at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors.Board. Additionally, he iswas eligible for annual bonus distributions up to $85,000 in cash and $150,000 in stock options as determined by the Board, of Directors, based on meeting and exceeding mutually agreed upon annual performance goals. For the year ended December 31, 2015,

Effective April 21, 2019, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Murphy was awarded cash bonuses totaling $247,335(the “New Employment Agreement”), with an initial term commencing April 21, 2019 and ending on April 20, 2022, which superseded the Previous Employment Agreement. Following the initial term, the New Employment Agreement will automatically renew for successive
79

one-year terms unless the year ended December 31, 2016,Company or Mr. Murphy was awardedprovides written notice of non-renewal at least 60 days prior to the end of the current term or the New Employment Agreement is otherwise terminated pursuant to its terms. Pursuant to the New Employment Agreement, Mr. Murphy receives an annual base salary of $249,900 with a guaranteed base salary increase of no less than 2% in April of each year and an automatic increase of 20% in the event that the Company reaches a market cap of $50 million for a specified amount of time. The New Employment Agreement provides for annual stock options with a fair value of $200,000 vesting over four years in equal monthly installments, subject to a maximum of 200,000 underlying shares. In the event the fair market value of the stock option grant is less than $200,000 as limited by the 200,000 share maximum, Mr. Murphy is entitled to receive the difference in fair market value through a combination of cash bonuses totaling $79,842and restricted stock units with the same vesting schedule as the stock options, at the sole discretion of which $15,078 was remainingthe Board. Additionally, he is eligible for an annual bonus of no less than $85,000 in cash and up to $150,000 in stock options (subject to a 200,000-share maximum, with any resulting difference in value to be paid in 2017.

In connection witha combination of cash and restricted stock units, at the agreement, Mr. Murphy received an optionsole discretion of the Board), in each case paid quarterly pursuant to purchase 40,000 sharesthe terms of commonthe New Employment Agreement. Such annual bonus will be based on the achievement of specified annual performance goals. Each such grant of stock at an exercise price of $5.20 per share, expiring on December 26, 2024. The option vests 15% immediately and the remainderoptions shall vest over three years in equal monthly installments over 41 months commencing December 31, 2014.installments.


Mr. Murphy's employment agreementNew Employment Agreement is subject to early termination (i) by the Company or Mr. Murphy for any reason upon written notice, to him(ii) by the Company for cause (as such term is defined in the New Employment Agreement), (iii) by Mr. Murphy for good reason (as such term is defined in the New Employment Agreement), and (iv) in the case of death disability and cause.or disability. If terminated, for any reason other than death, disability or cause, Mr. Murphy will be entitled to a severance of six months of his current salary and twelve months of COBRA payments. In the case of termination due to disability, Mr. Murphy will be entitled to a severance of his current salary until such time (but no more than 120 days after such disability) that disability insurance plan payments commence. If there is a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement)New Employment Agreement) and Mr. Murphy's employment terminates within six months following the change of control for reasons other than for cause, then Mr. Murphy will be entitled to such amount equal to sixtwelve months of his then current base salary.salary and twelve months of COBRA payments. The New Employment Agreement also provides for Mr. Murphy’s eligibility to receive benefits substantially similar to those of the Company’s other executives.


Pursuant toIn connection with the New Employment Agreement, Mr. Murphy received an employment agreement dated August 25, 2014, LeAnn C. Hitchcock will receive an annual base salary of $185,000 and be eligible for bonus distributions as determined by the Board of Directors, based on meeting and exceeding mutually agreed upon annual performance goals. Effective December 1, 2015, the Board increased Ms. Hitchcock's salary to an annual base salary of $200,000 and granted a stock option to purchase 10,000up to 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $8.00$1.06 per share expiring on December 1, 2025. The option vestswith an initial fair value of $123,490 vesting in equal monthly installments over 48 months commencing December 1, 2015.

from issuance.
    Ms. Hitchcock's employment agreement is subject to early termination for any reason upon written notice to her and in the case of death, disability and cause. If terminated, for any reason other than death, disability or cause,
LeAnn C. Hitchcock. Ms. Hitchcock will be entitled tojoined us in September 2011 as a severance of three months of her then current salary. In the case of termination due to disability,financial consultant and was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer in August 2014 until she resigned on August 15, 2018. Ms. Hitchcock will be entitled to a severance of current salary until such time (but no more than 120 days after such disability) that disability insurance plan payments commence. If there is a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement) and Ms. Hitchcock's employment terminates within six months following the change of control for reasons other than for cause, thenwas re-appointed as our Interim Chief Financial Officer effective December 9, 2019. We paid Ms. Hitchcock will be entitled to such amount equal toan aggregate of $267,639 and $70,624 for her then current compensationconsulting services for the greater of three months or the time remaining between the termination and the six month anniversary of the change of control. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2015, Ms. Hitchcock was awarded cash bonuses totaling $16,706 of which $5,341 was paid in 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2016, Ms. Hitchcock was awarded cash bonuses totaling $16,698 of which $5,321 was remaining to be paid in 2017.2020 and 2019, respectively.

Ryan S. Schram. On January 25, 2015, we entered into an Amendedamended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement,restated executive employment agreement, effective January 1, 2015, with Ryan S. Schram to serve as our Chief Operating Officer through December 31, 2017, subject to renewal, in consideration2017. The agreement auto-renewed for successive one-year periods if no termination notice is provided. Per the agreement, Mr. Schram received an annual base salary of $240,000 andwith an annual increase of no less than 2% on April 1st of each year beginning on April 1, 2015. Additionally, on January 1st each year, Mr. Schram received annual stock options with a fair value of $25,000 vesting over four years in equal monthly installments. However, the number of underlying shares of common stock shallcould not exceed 6,667 shares. In the event the fair market value of the stock option grant iswas less than $25,000 as limited by the 6,667 share cap, Mr. Schram willwould be entitled to receive either 50% of the difference in fair market value in cash or 100% of the difference in fair market value in Restricted

Stock Unitsrestricted stock with the same vesting schedule as the stock options, at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors.Board. Mr. Schram willwas also be eligible for annual bonus distributions up to $100,000 in cash and $25,000 in stock options based on meeting certain key performance indicators set forth in his employment agreement, as well as an annual override cash bonus of 0.4% or 0.65% based on our gross revenue. If Mr. Schram iswas terminated for any reason other than death, disability or cause, or if he resignsresigned for good reason (as those terms are defined in his amended employment agreement), Mr. Schram willwould be entitled to severance of six months’ current salary and bonus and override bonus as in effect on the date of termination. A change of control, under which Mr. Schram failsfailed to retain his responsibilities, willwould be deemed to constitute good reason under his amended employment agreement. ForEffective January 1, 2021, the year ended December 31, 2015,Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Schram was awarded cash bonuses totaling $139,761Schram.

80

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the cash compensation, as well as certain other compensation earned by each person who served as a non-employee director of IZEA, during the year ended December 31, 2016:
Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
Stock Awards ($) 
 Total
($)
Brian W. Brady (1)26,000
25,821
 51,821
John H. Caron (2)30,000
25,821
 55,821
Lindsay A. Gardner (3)26,000
25,821
 51,821
Jill M. Golder (4)30,000
25,821
 55,821
Daniel R. Rua (5)29,000
25,821
 54,821
_________________
(1)On August 7, 2012, we appointed Brian W. Brady to our Board of Directors. In 2015, Mr. Brady received 4,072 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. Its value upon vesting at the end of each month throughout 2016 was adjusted to $25,821. Mr. Brady also received cash compensation of $26,000 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.
(2)On April 13, 2015, we appointed John H. Caron to our Board of Directors. In 2015, Mr. Caron received 4,072 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. Its value upon vesting at the end of each month throughout 2016 was adjusted to $25,821. Mr. Caron also received cash compensation of $30,000 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.
(3)On December 10, 2013, we appointed Lindsay A. Gardner to our Board of Directors. In 2015, Mr. Gardner received 3,255 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. Its value upon vesting at the end of each month throughout 2016 was adjusted to $25,821. Mr. Gardner also received cash compensation of $26,000 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.
(4)On May 26, 2015, we appointed Jill M. Golder to our Board of Directors. In 2015, Ms. Golder received 1,832 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. Its value upon vesting at the end of each month throughout 2016 was adjusted to $25,821. Ms. Golder also received cash compensation of $30,000 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.
(5)On July 31, 2012, we reappointed Daniel R. Rua to our Board of Directors. In 2015, Mr. Rua received 3,255 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. Its value upon vesting at the end of each month throughout 2016 was adjusted to $25,821. Mr. Rua also received cash compensation of $29,000 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.

Effective March 1, 2013, the disinterested members of the Board implemented a compensation program for the directors that entitles each serving non-employee director to receive the following compensation:
An annual board retainer fee of $25,000 to be paid in restricted stock at the end of each calendar year earned equally over the year of service.
A cash retainer fee of $20,000 per year, payable in cash or restricted stock.
Reimbursement of actual and necessary travel and related expenses in connection with attending in-person Board meetings.
A $1,000 per meeting fee for all meetings of the Board of Directors, subject to a $6,000 annual cap.

A $1,000 per audit committee meeting fee, subject to a $4,000 annual cap.

Equity Compensation Plan InformationIncentive Plans


In May 2011, the board of directorsBoard adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of IZEA, Inc., which was amended and restated in 2020 (the “May 2011 Plan”). The May 2011 Plan allows us to provideaward restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options, as an incentive for employees and consultants.  The May 2011 Plan allows us to grant options to purchasecovering up to 1,000,000 shares as an incentive for its employees and consultants.  As of March 24, 2017, options to purchase 958,058 shares have been granted and are outstanding and options to purchase 23,565 shares have been exercised, leaving an aggregate of 18,3777,500,000 shares of common stock availableas incentive compensation for future grants under the May 2011 Plan.

our employees and consultants. On August 22, 2011, wethe Board adopted the 2011 B Equity Incentive Plan of IZEA, Inc. (the “August 2011 Plan”) reserving for issuance an aggregate of 4,375 shares of common stock. As of March 24, 2017, options to purchase all 4,375 shares have been granted and are outstandingstock for issuance under the August 2011 Plan. As of December 31, 2020, an aggregate of 1,003,917 shares of common stock have been issued in respect of exercised and vested awards under the May 2011 Plan and the August 2011 Plan.


Under both the May 2011 Plan and the August 2011 Plan, our board of directorsthe Board determines the exercise price to be paid for the option shares, the period within which each optionaward may be exercised, and the terms and conditions of each option.award, including any future vesting restrictions. The exercise price of the incentive and non-qualified stock options may not be less than 100% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the grant date. If an individual owns stock representing more than 10% of the outstanding shares, the price of each share of an incentive stock option must be equal to or exceed 110% of fair market value. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors at the time of grant, the purchase price is set at the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date (or the last trading day prior to the grant date, if it is awarded on a non-trading day). Additionally, the term is set at ten years and the optionsoption typically vestvests on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period as follows: 25% of options shall vest one year from the date of grant andwith the remaining options shall vestvesting monthly, in equal increments over the following three years. We issue new shares to the optionee for any stock awards or options exercised pursuant tounder our 2011 Equity Incentive Plans.


On April 16, 2014, stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock, upon previous recommendation and approval of our Board of Directors, adopted the IZEA, Inc.Our 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) and reserved 75,000provides for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of our common stock for issuance thereunder.stock. Any employee regularly employed by us for 90 days or more on a full-time or part-time basis (20 hours or more per week on a regular schedule) will beis eligible to participate in the ESPP. The ESPP will operateoperates in successive six monthsix-month offering periods commencing at the beginning of each fiscal year half. Each eligible employee who has elected to participate may purchase up to 10% of their annual compensation in common stock not to exceed $21,250 annually or 1,0002,000 shares per offering period. The purchase price will be the lower of (i) 85% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the first trading day of the offering period or (ii) 85% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the last trading day of the offering period. The ESPP will continue until January 1, 2024, unless otherwise terminated by our Board. As of March 24, 2017, 25,238December 31, 2020, 104,387 shares have been issued under the ESPP.


The following table sets forth information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016:2020:
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(a)(b)
(c) (1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders2,683,155 $2.56 4,212,916 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders— — — 
Total2,683,155 $2.56 4,212,916 
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
 (a)(b)(c)(1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders959,864
$8.11
77,843
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders


Total959,864
$8.11
77,843
_______________

(1) We have 28,081     As of December 31, 2020, we had 3,812,928 shares of common stock reservedavailable for future issuance under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, and 49,7624,375 shares of common stock reservedavailable for future issuance under our August 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and 395,613 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.


As of March 26, 2021, we had 59,129,390 shares of common stock issued, which includes 37,620 shares of unvested restricted stock, outstanding stock options to purchase 1,742,303 shares of our common stock at an average exercise price of $2.55 per share and unvested restricted stock units of 569,934 shares with an intrinsic value of $2,308,233.

81

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the cash compensation, as well as certain other compensation earned by each person who served as a non-employee director of IZEA during the year ended December 31, 2020:
NameFees Earned or Paid in CashStock AwardsOption Awards Total
Brian W. Brady (1)
$24,950 $25,000 $— $49,950 
John H. Caron (2)
$28,950 $25,000 $— $53,950 
Lindsay A. Gardner (3)
$24,950 $25,000 $— $49,950 
Daniel R. Rua (5)
$28,950 $25,000 $— $53,950 
Patrick J. Venetucci (6)
$28,950 $25,000 $— $53,950 
_______________
(1)In 2020, Mr. Brady received 78,125 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. The value of these shares was expensed as the shares vested in equal monthly installments from January through December 2020. Mr. Brady also received cash compensation of $24,950 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.
(2)In 2020, Mr. Caron received 78,125 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. The value of these shares was expensed as the shares vested in equal monthly installments from January through December 2020. Mr. Caron also received cash compensation of $28,950 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.
(3)In 2020, Mr. Gardner received 78,125 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. The value of these shares was expensed as the shares vested in equal monthly installments from January through December 2020. Mr. Gardner also received cash compensation of $24,950 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.
(4)In 2020, Mr. Rua received 78,125 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. The value of these shares was expensed as the shares vested in equal monthly installments from January through December 2020. Mr. Rua also received cash compensation of $28,950 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.
(5)In 2020, Mr. Venetucci received 78,125 shares of restricted stock originally valued at $25,000 upon issuance. The value of these shares was expensed as the shares vested in equal monthly installments from January through December 2020. Mr. Rua also received cash compensation of $28,950 in accordance with the non-employee director compensation program effected in March 2013.
_________________

Effective March 1, 2013, the Board implemented a compensation program that entitles each serving non-employee director to receive the following compensation:
An annual board retainer fee of $25,000 to be paid in restricted stock each calendar year earned equally over the year of service.
A cash retainer fee of $20,000 per year, payable in cash or restricted stock.
Reimbursement of actual and necessary travel and related expenses in connection with attending in-person Board meetings.
A $1,000 per meeting fee for all meetings of the Board, subject to a $6,000 annual cap.
A $1,000 per Audit Committee meeting fee, subject to a $4,000 annual cap.

    Directors who are also employees of the Company are not paid for their service as directors.


ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners


The following table and accompanying footnotes below set forthpresents information as of March 24, 2017 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 26, 2021 by:
each person or group whoof affiliated persons, known to us to beneficially ownsown more than 5% of our outstanding common stock (“5% holders”);
each of our directors and named executive officers; and,
our Named Executive Officers, and
all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.

82

AThe number of shares of our common stock owned by each person is deemeddetermined under the rules of the SEC. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to bewhich the beneficial owner of securitiesindividual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares that can be acquired within 60 days from the exercise of stock options and warrants orindividual has the conversion of convertible securities. Accordingly, common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisableright to acquire within 60 days after March 26, 2021, or by May 25, 2021, through the dateconversion of this annual report,a security or other right. Shares not outstanding but deemed beneficially owned by virtue of the right of a person to acquire those shares are treated as outstanding only for purposes of determining the number and percent of shares of common stock issuable upon conversionowned by such person or group. We are not aware of convertible securities, have been included in the table with respect to the beneficial ownershipany 5% holders of the person owning theour common stock options, warrants and convertible securities, but not with respect to any other persons.as of March 26, 2021.


Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the following table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them and that person’sthe address of each person named in the following table is c/o IZEA Worldwide, Inc., 480501 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 200,313, PMB 247 Winter Park, FLFlorida 32789.
Name of Beneficial OwnerShares Beneficially Owned
 Percentage of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1)
Executive Officers and Directors:
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy (2)
1,457,809 2.4 %
Ryan S. Schram (3)
200,063 *
LeAnn C. Hitchcock (4)
12,557 *
Brian W. Brady (5)
1,532,807 2.6 %
John H. Caron (6)
141,286 *
Lindsay A. Gardner (7)
201,877 *
Jill M. Golder (8)
20,143 *
Daniel R. Rua (9)
136,953 *
Patrick J. Venetucci (10)
103,137 *
All executive officers and directors as a group (9 persons) (11)
3,806,632 6.3 %
Name of Beneficial Owner Shares Beneficially Owned 
 Percentage of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned (1)
Executive Officers and Directors:    
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy (2) 398,395
 6.6%
Ryan S. Schram (3) 66,358
 1.2%
LeAnn C. Hitchcock (4) 23,474
 *
Brian W. Brady (5) 917,580
 16.2%
John H. Caron (6) 32,669
 *
Lindsay A. Gardner (7) 75,155
 1.3%
Jill M. Golder (8) 11,831
 *
Daniel R. Rua (9) 22,165
 *
     
5% Stockholders:    
Special Situations Technology Fund II, L.P. (10) 546,621
 9.6%
Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. (10) 375,132
 6.6%
Special Situations Technology Fund, L.P. (10) 96,463
 1.7%
     
All executive officers and directors as a group (8 persons) (11) 1,547,627
 25.2%
________________________________
* Less than 1%
(1)Applicable percentage of ownership for each holder is based on 5,670,904 shares outstanding as of March 24, 2017.
(2)Includes 28,157 shares and exercisable stock options to purchase 368,344 shares of common stock under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.
(3)Includes 3,370 shares and exercisable stock options to purchase 62,020 shares of common stock under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.
(4)Includes 1,932 shares and exercisable stock options to purchase 21,125 shares of common stock under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.

(5)Includes 911,183 shares, exercisable stock options to purchase 5,772 shares of common stock under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and exercisable stock options to purchase 625 shares of common stock under our August 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.
(6)Includes 27,669 shares and exercisable stock options to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.
(7)Includes 69,606 shares, exercisable stock options to purchase 3,049 shares of common stock under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and exercisable stock options to purchase 2,500 shares of common stock under our August 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.
(8)Includes 9,331 shares, exercisable stock options to purchase 2,500 shares of common stock under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.
(9)Includes 16,246 shares, exercisable stock options to purchase 5,294 shares of common stock under our May 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and exercisable stock options to purchase 625 shares of common stock under our August 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.
(10)Special Situations Technology Fund II, L.P. (SSFTechII) is the registered holder of 546,621 shares, Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. (SSFPE) is the registered holder of 375,132 shares, and Special Situations Technology Fund, L.P. (SSFTech) is the registered holder of 96,463 shares.  As a result of the beneficial ownership limitations included in the warrants held by SSFTechII, SSFPE and SSFTech, the warrants may be exercised to the extent that the total number of shares of common stock then beneficially owned does not exceed 19.99% of the outstanding stock. AWM Investment Company, Inc. (AWM) is the investment adviser to SSFTechII, SSFPE and SSFTech.  Austin W. Marxe, David M. Greenhouse and Adam C. Stettner are the principal owners of AWM.  Through their control of AWM, Messrs. Marxe, Greenhouse and Stettner share voting and investment control over the portfolio securities of each of the Special Situations funds listed above.  The address of the Special Situations funds is 527 Madison Avenue, Suite 2600, New York, NY 10022.
(11)For all executive officers and directors as a group, this amount includes 1,067,494 shares and exercisable stock options to purchase 476,854 shares of common stock under our Equity Incentive Plans as further detailed in footnotes (2) through (9) above.

1 percent.

(1)Applicable percentage of ownership for each holder is based on 59,129,390 shares outstanding as of March 26, 2021.

(2)Includes 526,868 outstanding shares of common stock, exercisable stock options to purchase 889,376 shares of common stock, and 41,565 restricted stock units expected to vest within the 60 days under the 2011 Plan.
(3)Includes 127,079 outstanding shares of common stock, exercisable stock options to purchase 67,700 shares of common stock, and 5,284 restricted stock units expected to vest within the 60 days under the 2011 Plan.
(4)Includes 12,432 outstanding shares of common stock and exercisable stock options to purchase 125 shares of common stock under the 2011 Plan.
(5)Includes 1,522,300 outstanding shares of common stock and stock options exercisable for 10,507 shares of common stock under the 2011 Plan.
(6)Includes 138,786 outstanding shares of common stock and stock options exercisable for 2,500 shares of common stock under the 2011 Plan.
(7)Includes 200,723 outstanding shares of common stock, stock options exercisable for 1,154 shares of common stock under the 2011 Plan.
(8)Includes 20,143 outstanding shares of common stock.
(9)Includes 127,363 outstanding shares of common stock and stock options exercisable for 9,590 shares of common stock under the 2011 Plan.
(10)Includes 98,137 outstanding shares of common stock and stock options exercisable for 5,000 shares of common stock under the 2011 Plan.
(11)For all executive officers and directors as a group, this amount includes 2,773,831 outstanding shares of common stock, exercisable stock options to purchase 985,952 shares of common stock and 46,849 restricted stock units expected to vest within 60 days of March 26, 2021under the 2011 Plan as further detailed in footnotes (2) through (10) above.


ITEM 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


83

We review all transactions involving us in which any of our directors, director nominees, significant shareholders and executive officers and their immediate family members are participants to determine whether such person has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. All directors, director nominees and executive officers must notify us of any proposed transaction involving us in which such person has a direct or indirect material interest. Such proposed transaction is then reviewed by either the Board as a whole or the Audit Committee, which determines whether or not to approve the transaction. After such review, the reviewing body approves the transaction only if it determines that the transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of our Company and our shareholders.


Certain Transactions


ExceptOn May 10, 2019, the Company completed an underwritten registered public offering of 14,285,714 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $0.70 per share, for total gross proceeds of approximately $10 million. The net proceeds to the Company were approximately $9.2 million. Mr. Edward Murphy, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a Company director, and Mr. Troy J. Vanke, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, participated in the public offering and purchased 21,428 and 42,857 shares of common stock, respectively.

Other than as described below, since the beginning of our last fiscal year,above, there have been no transactions whether directlysince January 1, 2019 or indirectly, between usany currently proposed transaction, in which the Company was or is to be a participant and any of our respective officers, directors, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock or their family members, thatthe amount involved exceeded the lesser of $120,000 or 1% of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years.years, and in which any of our respective officers, directors, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock or their family members had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.


In our private placement completed on February 21, 2014, Edward H. (Ted) Murphy,Director Independence

The Board has determined that Brian W. Brady, andJohn H. Caron, Lindsay A. Gardner, directors of IZEA, purchased from us 436 shares, 35,714 sharesJill M. Golder, Daniel R. Rua and 28,572 shares of our common stock, respectively, at a purchase price of $7.00 per share, pursuant to a Purchase Agreement datedPatrick J. Venetucci are “independent directors” as of February 12, 2014. As part of the private placement, they each received warrants to purchase up to 50% of their number of shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.00 per share and warrants to purchase up to another 50% of their number of shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share.

In our warrant exchange transaction completed on August 14, 2015, the Special Situations funds, our largest institutional shareholder, and Brian W. Brady, a director of IZEA, participateddefined in the transaction by exercising warrants that they received in our previous private placements. The Special Situations funds made a payment to us in the amount of $3,414,572 in consideration for 542,858 shares of our common stock, and Mr. Brady made a payment to us in the amount of $2,460,208 in consideration for 502,940 shares of our common stock. The Special Situations funds and Mr. Brady exercised their warrants at the same price and on the same terms and conditions as all other warrantholders in the transaction, the negotiation of which terms was led by the Special Situations funds and other institutional shareholders.
On August 15, 2015, we issued 84,375 shares of common stock to Brian W. Brady for shares that were granted to him in 2013 as consideration for loans made to us.

Director Independence

Each of our directors other than Edward H. (Ted) Murphy, Ryan S. Schram and Brian W. Brady qualifies as “independent” in accordance with the published listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market.Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). As provided by the Nasdaq rules, the Board has made a subjective determination as to each independent director that no relationships exists which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In making these determinations, the directorsBoard reviewed and discussed information provided by the directors with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to us and our management.


We review all transactions involving us in which any of our directors, director nominees, significant shareholders and executive officers and their immediate family members are participants to determine whether such person has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction.  All directors, director nominees and executive officers must notify us of any proposed transaction involving us in which such person has a direct or indirect material interest.  Such proposed transaction is then reviewed by either the Board as a whole or the Audit Committee, which determines whether or not to approve the transaction.  After such review, the reviewing body approves the transaction only if it determines that the transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of IZEA and its shareholders.




ITEM 14 - PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

On August 1, 2015,Audit Committee Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee must pre-approve all auditing services and permitted non-audit services (including the practicefees and terms thereof) to be performed for us by our independent auditors, subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of Cross, Fernandez & Riley,the Exchange Act, which should nonetheless be approved by the Board prior to the completion of the audit. Each year, the Audit Committee approves the independent auditor’s retention to audit our financial statements, including the associated fee, before the filing of the previous year’s Annual Report. At the beginning of the fiscal year, the Audit Committee will evaluate other known potential engagements of the independent auditor, including the scope of work proposed to be performed and the proposed fees, and approve or reject each service, taking into account whether the services are permissible under applicable law and the possible impact of each non-audit service on the independent auditor’s independence from management. At each such subsequent meeting, the auditor and management may present subsequent services for approval. Typically, these would be services, such as due diligence for an acquisition, that would not have been known at the beginning of the year.

Each new engagement of BDO USA, LLP ("CFR"(“BDO”), which was engaged as ouran independent registered public accounting firm, was combined with BDO USA, LLP ("BDO")has been approved in advance by the Board, and none of those engagements made use of the professional staff and partnersde minimis exception to the pre-approval contained in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of CFR joined BDO either as employees or partnersthe Exchange Act.

84

The following table presents the resignation of CFR, we, through and with the approval of our Board of Directors, appointed BDO as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Audit Fees

Audit Fees consisted ofaggregate fees billed, by type of fee, in relation to services provided to us by BDO:
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
20202019
Audit Fees (1)
$294,803 $255,589 
Audit-Related Fees (2)
— — 
Tax Fees (3)
— 28,534 
All Other Fees (4)
— — 
Total$294,803 $284,123 
(1)“Audit Fees” means the aggregate fees billed by the principal accountant for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements.
(2)“Audit-Related Fees” means the interim financial statements includedaggregate fees billed by the principal accountant in quarterly reports,each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and review of other documents filed with the SEC within those fiscal years. Audit fees charged by BDOrelated services reasonably related to the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $135,160 and $111,300, respectively. Audit fees charged by CFR related toperformance of the year ended December 31, 2015 was $28,150. Allaudit or review of these fees were pre-approved by our Board of Directors.financial statements.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no audit-related(3)“Tax Fees” means the aggregate fees billed by BDOthe principal accountant in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services for tax compliance. No tax advice or CFR to us duringtax planning services were rendered by the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.principal accountant.

Tax Fees

Tax fees relate to preparation of federal and state income tax returns, tax consultation and compliance services, and additional tax research. Tax(4)“All Other Fees” means the aggregate fees billed by BDO during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $13,217 and $10,410, respectively. Tax fees billed by CFR during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $1,470. All of these fees were pre-approved by the Board of Directors.

All Other Fees

There were no fees for other services billed by BDO or CFR to us during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Section 10A(i)(1)principal accountant in each of the Exchange Actlast two fiscal years for products and related SEC rules require that all auditing and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our principal accountants be approved in advance by the Audit Committeeother than those reported above.

85

The audit committee has considered the services provided by BDO and CFR as disclosed above and has concluded that such services are compatible with the independence of BDO and CFR as our principal accountant.



PART IV


ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


(a)The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report:
(1)Financial Statements (see “Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” at Item 8 and incorporated herein by reference).
(2)Financial Statement Schedules (Schedules to the Financial Statements have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the accompanying Financial Statements or notes thereto).
(3)Exhibits
 
2.1Exhibit No.Description
2.1
2.2
3.12.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
86

4.13.9Form
4.23.10Form
4.33.11*Form
4.1
10.1(a)Amended
10.2
10.210.3(a)Financing Agreement between the Company
10.3Form of Securities Purchase Agreement executed by IZEA, Inc. and Investors in the 2013 Private Placement (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on AugustDecember 21, 2013)2020).
10.4(a)Form of Securities
10.5(a)Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2014, among IZEA, Inc. and each of the Investors
10.6(a)
10.7(a)2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 18, 2014).
10.8(a)Employment Agreement between IZEA, Inc.
10.9(a)Employment Agreement between IZEA, Inc. and Edward Murphy dated December 26, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 31, 2014).
10.10(a)Restated Executive Employment Agreement between IZEA, Inc. and Ryan Schram dated January 25, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s current reportCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 29, 2015).

10.8(a)
10.9
10.11
10.10
21.110.11*(a)
21.1*
23.1*
31.1*
31.2*
32.1* (b)(a)
32.2* (b)(a)
101(c)* (b)The following materials from IZEA Worldwide, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162020 are formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow, and (iv) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

*Filed herewith.

(a)Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(b)In accordance with Item 601of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is hereby furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

(c)In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.



*    Filed or furnished herewith.


87

(a)    Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(b)    In accordance with Item 601of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is hereby furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

(c)    In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.


ITEM 16 – FORM 10-K SUMMARY

    None

88

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
a Nevada corporation
March 30, 2021By: /s/ Edward H. Murphy 
Edward H. Murphy
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
March 30, 2021IZEA, Inc.
a Nevada corporation
By: 
March 28, 2017By: /s/ Edward H. Murphy 
Edward H. Murphy
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
March 28, 2017By: /s/ LeAnn C. Hitchcock
LeAnn C. Hitchcock

Interim
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 











89

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this reportAnnual Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Edward H. MurphyMarch 28, 201730, 2021
Edward H. Murphy
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ LeAnn C. HitchcockMarch 28, 201730, 2021
LeAnn C. Hitchcock
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Ryan S. SchramMarch 28, 201730, 2021
Ryan S. Schram
President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
/s/ Brian W. BradyMarch 28, 201730, 2021
Brian W. Brady
Director
/s/ John H. CaronMarch 28, 201730, 2021
John H. Caron
Director
/s/ Lindsay A. GardnerMarch 28, 201730, 2021
Lindsay A. Gardner
Director
/s/ Jill M. GolderMarch 28, 201730, 2021
Jill M. Golder
Director
/s/ Daniel R. RuaMarch 28, 201730, 2021
Daniel R. Rua
Director
/s/ Patrick J. VenetucciMarch 30, 2021
Patrick J. Venetucci
Director


8090