UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-54939
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Maryland 27-3148022
 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
 2325 2398 East Camelback Road, 104th Floor
Phoenix,Arizona85016
(Address of principal executive offices; zipoffices)(Zip code)
(602)
(602)
778-8700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading SymbolName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
NoneNoneNone
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filero
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

x
Smaller reporting companyoEmerging growth companyo
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☐ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
There is no established market for the registrant’s shares of common stock. As of June 30, 2017,2020, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, there were approximately 311.3309.7 million shares of common stock held by non-affiliates, for an aggregate market value of $3.1$2.2 billion, assuming a market value as of that date of $10.08$7.26 per share, the most recent estimated per share net asset value of the registrant’s common stock established by the registrant’s board of directors atin effect as of that time.date. Effective March 29, 2018,August 14, 2020, the estimated per share net asset value of the registrant’s common stock as of December 31, 20172020 is $9.37$7.31 per share.
As of March 26, 2018,22, 2021, there were approximately 311.5362.0 million shares of common stock, par value per share of $0.01, of Cole Credit PropertyCIM Real Estate Finance Trust, IV, Inc. outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
The Registrant incorporates by reference portions of the Cole Credit PropertyCIM Real Estate Finance Trust, IV, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (into Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III).








TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
ITEM 1.
ITEM 1A.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
TABLE OF CONTENTSPART II
ITEM 5.
PART I
ITEM 1.
ITEM 1A.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
PART II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7A.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9A.
ITEM 9B.
PART III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 14.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
ITEM 16.







CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cole Credit PropertyCIM Real Estate Finance Trust, IV, Inc., other than historical facts, may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable by law. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” or other similar words. Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, those discussed below. In addition, these risks and uncertainties include those associated with (i) the scope, severity and duration of the current novel coronavirus (“COVID‑19”) pandemic and actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, (ii) the potential adverse effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and performance of the Company and its tenants, the real estate market and the global economy and financial markets, among others, and (iii) general economic, market and other conditions. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s view only as of the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Additionally, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results.
The following are some, but not all, of the assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:
We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire on favorable terms or at all.
We are subject to risks associated with tenant, geographic and industry concentrations with respect to our properties.
Our properties, intangible assets and other assets may be subject to impairment charges.
We could be subject to unexpected costs or unexpected liabilities that may arise from potential dispositions and may be unable to dispose of properties on advantageous terms.dispositions.
We are subject to competition in the acquisition and disposition of properties and in the leasing of our properties and we may suffer delays or be unable to acquire, dispose of, or lease properties on advantageous terms.
We could beare subject to risks associated with bankruptcies or insolvencies of tenants or from tenant defaults generally.
We have substantial indebtedness, which may affect our ability to pay distributions and expose us to interest rate fluctuation risk and the risk of default under our debt obligations.
We may be affected byare subject to risks associated with the incurrence of additional secured or unsecured debt.
We may not be able to maintain profitability.
We may not generate cash flows sufficient to pay our distributions to stockholders or meet our debt service obligations.
Our continued compliance with debt covenants depends on many factors and could be impacted by current or future economic conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
We may be affected by risks resulting from losses in excess of insured limits.
We may fail to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Our advisor hasWe may be unable to successfully reposition our portfolio or list our shares on a national securities exchange, in the righttimeframe we expect or at all.
We may be unable to terminateachieve any cost synergies anticipated to result from the advisory agreement upon 60 days’ written notice without cause or penalty.

Mergers (as defined below).
All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2

Table of Contents



Definitions
We use certain defined terms throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K that have the following meanings:
The phrase “annualized rental income” refers to the straight-line rental revenue under our leases on operating properties owned as of the respective reporting date, which includes the effect of rent escalations and any tenant concessions, such as free rent, and excludes any bad debt allowances and any contingent rent, such as percentage rent. Management uses annualized rental income as a basis for tenant, industry and geographic concentrations and other metrics within the portfolio. Annualized rental income is not indicative of future performance.
Under a “net lease,” the tenant occupying the leased property (usually as a single tenant) does so in much the same manner as if the tenant were the owner of the property. The tenant generally agrees that it will either have no ability or only limited ability to terminate the lease or abate rent prior to the expiration of the term of the lease as a result of real estate driven events such as casualty, condemnation or failure by the landlord to fulfill its obligations under the lease. There are various forms of net leases, most typically classified as either triple-net or double-net. Triple-net leases typically require the tenant to pay all expenses associated with the property (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs, including roof, structure and parking lot). Double-net leases typically hold the landlord responsible for the capital expenditures for the roof and structure, while the tenant is responsible for all lease payments and remaining operating expenses associated with the property (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance).

3

Table of Contents



PART I
ITEM 1.BUSINESS
Formation
Cole Credit PropertyITEM 1.BUSINESS
Our Company
CIM Real Estate Finance Trust, IV, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is a non-exchange traded REIT formed as a Maryland corporation that was formed on July 27, 2010 our date of inception, which hasthat elected to be taxed and qualifiedcurrently qualifies as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”)REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencingbeginning with ourits taxable year ended December 31, 2012.
Historically, we have primarily acquired core commercial real estate assets principally consisting of necessity retail properties located throughout the United States. We use the term “core” to describe existing properties currently operating and generating income that are leased to creditworthy tenants under long-term net leases and are strategically located. In April of 2019, we announced our intention to pursue a more diversified investment strategy by balancing our existing portfolio of core commercial real estate assets with future investments in a portfolio of commercial mortgage loans and other real estate-related credit investments that we would originate, acquire, finance and manage.
As of December 31, 2020, we owned 516 properties, comprising 21.3 million rentable square feet of commercial space located in 45 states. As of December 31, 2020, the rentable space at these properties was 94.1% leased, including month-to-month agreements, if any. In addition, our loan portfolio consisted of 206 loans with a net book value of $892.3 million, and investments in real estate-related securities of $38.2 million as of December 31, 2020.
A majority of our business is conducted through CIM Real Estate Finance Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“CMFT OP”), of which we are the sole general partner of and own, directly or indirectly, 100% of the partnership interests, in Cole Operating Partnership IV, LP (“CCPT IV OP”), a Delaware limited partnership.
On November 13, 2017, VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P. (“VEREIT OP”), a former affiliated entity of our sponsor, CCO Group (as defined below), entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with CCA Acquisition, LLC (“CCA”), a newly-formed affiliate of CIM Group, LLC (“CIM”), pursuant to which CCA agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Cole Capital Advisors, Inc., the direct or indirect owner of Cole REIT Advisors IV, LLC (“CR IV Advisors”), Cole Capital Corporation and CREI Advisors, LLC (“CREI Advisors”), our external advisor, dealer manager and property manager, respectively (the “Transaction”). CIM is a vertically-integrated owner and operator of real assets with multidisciplinary expertise and in-house research, acquisition, credit analysis, development, finance, leasing, and asset management capabilities. CIM is headquartered in Los Angeles, California and has offices in Oakland, California; Bethesda, Maryland; Dallas, Texas; New York, New York; Chicago, Illinois; and Phoenix, Arizona.
On February 1, 2018, the Transaction was completed. Immediately following the completion of the Transaction, Cole Capital Advisors, Inc. and our dealer manager were each converted into Delaware limited liability companies, Cole Capital Advisors, Inc.’s name was changed to CCO Group, LLC, and our dealer manager’s name was changed to CCO Capital, LLC (“CCO Capital”). As a result of the Transaction, CIM owns and/or controls CCO Group, LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively, “CCO Group”), and CCO Group, LLC owns and controls CR IV Advisors, CCO Capital and CREI Advisors, our external advisor, dealer manager for the Offerings (as defined below) and property manager, respectively.subsidiaries.
In addition, as part of the Transaction, VEREIT OP and CCO Group, LLC entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) pursuant to which VEREIT OP will continue to provide certain services to CCO Group and to us, Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”), and Cole Real Estate Income Strategy (Daily NAV), Inc. (“Cole Income NAV Strategy”) (CCPT V, CCIT II, CCIT III, Cole Income NAV Strategy and us collectively, the “Cole REITs®”), including operational real estate support. VEREIT OP will continue to provide such services through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITs with respect to its 2018 fiscal year) (the “Initial Services Term”) and will provide consulting and research services through December 31, 2023 as requested by CCO Group, LLC.
Despite the indirect change of ownership and control of our advisor, dealer manager, property manager and sponsor, we expect that, during the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, the advisory, dealer manager and property management services we receive will continue without any material changes in personnel (except as supplemented by the management oversight of CIM personnel) or material change in service procedures. During the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, CCO Group, LLC intends to evaluate and effectuate an appropriate transition of VEREIT OP’s services under the Services Agreement to other CIM affiliates or third parties with the goal of ensuring continuity and minimizing disruption.
CCO Group has sponsored and operated various real estate investment programs. CR IV Advisors, pursuant to an advisory agreement with us, is responsible for managing our affairs on a day-to-day basis and for identifying and making acquisitions and investments on our behalf. Pursuant to the advisory agreement, CR IV Advisors has fiduciary obligations to us and our stockholders. Our charter provides that our independent directors are responsible for reviewing the performance of CR IV Advisors and determining whether the compensation paid to CR IV Advisors and its affiliates is reasonable. The advisory agreement with CR IV Advisors has a term that is reconsidered for renewal on an annual basis by our board of directors.
Pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed under the Securities Act (Registration No. 333-169533) and declared effective by the SEC on January 26, 2012, weWe commenced our initial public offering in January of 2012 on a “best efforts” basis of up to a maximum of $2.975 billion in shares of common stock (the “Offering”). On November 25, 2013, we reallocated $400.0 million in shares from our distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”) portion of the Offering to the primary offering, and on February 18, 2014, we reallocated an additional $23.0 million in shares from the DRIP portion of the Offering to the primary offering. As a result of these reallocations, the Offering, which offered up to a maximum of approximately 292.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $10.00$10.00 per share, and up to approximately 5.5 million additional shares pursuantallocated to the DRIPour distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”) under which our stockholders could have elected to have distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock at a price of $9.50$9.50 per share.

4

Table of Contents


We terminated the Offering on April 4, 2014. At the completion of the Offering in April of 2014, a total of approximately 297.4 million shares of common stock had been issued, including approximately 292.3 million shares of common stock sold to the public pursuant to the primary portion of the Offering and approximately 5.1 million shares of common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP portion of the Offering. The remaining approximately 404,000 unsold shares from the Offering were deregistered.
In addition, we registered $247.0 million in shares of common stock under the DRIP pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act (Registration No. 333-192958) (the “Initial DRIP Offering”), which was filed with the SEC on December 19, 2013 and automatically became effective with the SEC upon filing.2013. We ceased issuing shares under the Initial DRIP Offering effective as of June 30, 2016. At the completion of the Initial DRIP Offering, a total of approximately $241.7 million of common stock had been issued. The remaining $5.3 million of unsold shares from the Initial DRIP Offering were deregistered.
We registered an additional $600.0 million of shares of common stock under the DRIP pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-212832) (the “Secondary DRIP Offering,” and together with the Initial DRIP Offering, the “DRIP Offerings,” and the DRIP Offerings collectively with the Offering, the “Offerings”), which was filed with the SEC on August 2, 2016 and automatically became effective with the SEC upon filing.2016. We have issued and will continuecontinued to issue shares of common stock under the Secondary DRIP Offering.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had issued approximately 339.2362.4 million shares of our common stock in the Offerings, including 40.964.1 million shares issued in the DRIP Offerings, for gross offering proceeds of $3.4$3.6 billion before organization and offering costs, selling commissions and dealer manager fees of $306.0$306.0 million. In addition, on December 21, 2020, we issued 52.6 million. shares of common stock in connection with the Mergers as defined and discussed below.
On September 27, 2015,December 21, 2020, we announced thatcompleted mergers with Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”) and Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V”), pursuant to (i) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 30, 2020 (as amended on November 3, 2020, the “CCIT III Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Thor III Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of ours (“CCIT III Merger Sub”), and CCIT III, with CCIT III Merger Sub surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of ours (the “CCIT III Merger”), and (ii) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 30, 2020 (as amended on each of October 22, 2020, October 24, 2020 and October 29, 2020, the “CCPT V Merger Agreement”, and together with the CCIT III Merger Agreement, the “Merger Agreements”), by and among the Company, Thor V Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of ours (“CCPT V Merger Sub”), and CCPT V, with CCPT V Merger Sub surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of ours (the “CCPT V Merger,” and collectively with the CCIT III Merger, the “Mergers”). In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), the separate existence of CCIT III and CCPT V ceased. Through the Mergers, we acquired 146 properties with a total of 3.8 million square feet, all of which had an aggregate gross real estate value of approximately $763.0 million. The combined company after the Mergers retains the name
4

Table of Contents

“CIM Real Estate Finance Trust, Inc.” Each Merger qualified as a “reorganization” under, and within the meaning of, Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
Our Manager, Investment Advisor and CIM
We are externally managed by CIM Real Estate Finance Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CMFT Management”), which is an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC (“CIM”). CIM is a community-focused real estate and infrastructure owner, operator, lender and developer. Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, CIM has offices across the United States and in Tokyo, Japan.
We have no paid employees and rely upon our boardmanager pursuant to our Amended and Restated Management Agreement dated August 20, 2019 (the “Management Agreement”), as well as its affiliates, including CCO Capital, LLC (“CCO Capital”), our dealer manager, CREI Advisors, LLC (“CREI Advisors”), our property manager, and CIM Capital IC Management, LLC (the “Investment Advisor”), our investment advisor with respect to investments in securities, to provide substantially all of directors had establishedour day-to-day management. Our manager, CCO Capital, and CREI Advisors are owned directly or indirectly by CCO Group, LLC. Collectively, CCO Group, LLC, CCO Capital and CREI Advisors serve as our sponsor, which we refer to as our “sponsor” or “CCO Group.” Our Management Agreement is for a three-year term and renews automatically each year thereafter for an additional one-year period unless terminated by our Board.
On December 6, 2019, CMFT Securities Investments, LLC (“CMFT Securities”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an investment advisory and management agreement (the “Investment Advisory and Management Agreement”) with our Investment Advisor. CMFT Securities was formed for the purpose of holding any investments in securities made by the Company. The Investment Advisor, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIM, is registered as an investment advisor with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, the Investment Advisor will manage the day-to-day business affairs of CMFT Securities and its investments in corporate credit and real estate-related securities, subject to the supervision of the Board. The Investment Advisory and Management Agreement shall continue for a term of three years and shall be deemed renewed automatically each year thereafter for an additional one-year period unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement.
In addition, on December 6, 2019, the Investment Advisor entered into a sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with OFS Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Sub-Advisor”), to act as an investment sub-advisor to CMFT Securities. The Sub-Advisor is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act and is an affiliate of the Investment Advisor. The Sub-Advisor is responsible for providing investment management services with respect to the corporate credit and real estate-related securities held by CMFT Securities. Either party may terminate the Sub-Advisory Agreement with 30 days’ prior written notice to the other party.
Net Asset Value
Our Board establishes an estimated per share net asset value (“NAV”) of the Company’s common stock as of August 31, 2015, of $9.70 per share for purposes of assisting broker-dealers that participated in the Offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations under National Association of Securities Dealers ConductFinancial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Rule 2340. On November 10, 2016, our board of directors established an updated estimated per share net asset value (“NAV”) of our common stock, as of September 30, 2016, of $9.92 per share. On March 24, 2017, our board of directors established an updated2231.
The following table summarizes the estimated per share NAV of our common stock for the periods indicated below:
Valuation DatePeriod CommencingPeriod EndingNAV per Share
August 31, 2015October 1, 2015November 13, 2016$9.70 
September 30, 2016November 14, 2016March 27, 2017$9.92 
December 31, 2016March 28, 2017March 28, 2018$10.08 
December 31, 2017March 29, 2018March 19, 2019$9.37 
December 31, 2018March 26, 2019March 29, 2020$8.65 
December 31, 2019March 30, 2020May 28, 2020$7.77 
March 31, 2020May 29, 2020August 13, 2020$7.26 
June 30, 2020August 14, 2020$7.31 
For participants in the DRIP, distributions were reinvested in shares of our common stock under the DRIP at the most recent estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2016, of $10.08 per share. On March 29, 2018,determined by our boardBoard. Commencing on August 14, 2020, following our Board’s determination of directors established an updated estimated per share NAV, of our common stock, as of December 31, 2017, of $9.37 per share.
Prior to October 1, 2015, distributions were reinvested in shares of our common stock under the DRIP at a price of $9.50 per share. From October 1, 2015 to November 13, 2016, distributions were reinvested in shares of our common stock under the DRIP at a price of $9.70 per share, the estimated value per share as of August 31, 2015, as determined by our board of directors. From November 14, 2016 to March 27, 2017, distributions were reinvested in shares of our common stock under the DRIP at a price of $9.92$7.31 per share, the estimated per share NAV as of SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2020, as determined by our boardBoard. Additionally,
5

Table of directors. From March 28, 2017 to March 28, 2018, distributions were reinvested in shares of our common stock under the DRIP at a price of $10.08Contents

$7.31 per share the estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2016, as determined by our board of directors. Commencing on March 29, 2018, following the board of directors’ determination of an updated estimated per share NAV, distributions will be reinvested in shares of our common stock under the DRIP at a price of $9.37 per share, the estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2017, as determined by our board of directors. Additionally, $9.37 per share will serveserved as the most recent estimated per share NAV for purposes of the share redemption program. On August 30, 2020, the Board approved the suspension of the DRIP and the share redemption program in connection with our entry into the Merger Agreements. On March 25, 2021, our Board reinstated the DRIP and the share redemption program, effective April 1, 2021. We have not made any adjustments to the valuation of our estimated per share NAV for the impact of other transactions occurring subsequent to August 14, 2020, including, but not limited to, our entry into the Merger Agreements on August 30, 2020 or the consummation of the Mergers on December 21, 2020. See Part II, Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Share Redemption Program in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our share redemption program.
We primarily acquireInvestment Strategy and Objectives
Our investment strategy is to diversify our investments and capital structure by balancing our existing core portfolio of necessity commercial real estate assets, primarily consisting of necessity retail properties located throughout the United States. We use the term “core” to describe existing properties currently operating and generating income that are leased to national and regional creditworthy tenants under long-term net leases and are strategically located. As of December 31, 2017, we owned 909 properties, which includes nine properties owned through a consolidated joint venture arrangement (the “Consolidated Joint Venture”), comprising 26.9 million rentable square feet of commercial space located in 45 states. As of December 31, 2017, the rentable space at these properties was 97.5% leased, including month-to-month agreements, if any.
Investment Objectives and Policies
Our primary investment objectives are:
to acquire quality commercial real estate properties, net leased under long-term leases to creditworthy tenants and which provide current operating cash flow;flows, with real estate related credit investments, including commercial real estate mortgage loans and other real estate related debt and securities investments in which our manager and its affiliates have expertise.
In order to execute on this strategy, we intend, subject to market conditions, to sell a substantial portion of our anchored shopping centers and certain single tenant properties and redeploy the proceeds from those sales into the origination, participation in, and acquisition of our targeted credit investments. Assuming the successful repositioning of our portfolio, we then intend to pursue a listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange. We cannot make assurances that we will successfully reposition our portfolio as a mortgage REIT or list our common stock on a national securities exchange within a particular timeframe or at all.
We believe a diversified investment portfolio of net lease real estate assets and other credit investments, combined with our manager’s ability to actively manage those investments, will enable us to generate competitive risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders over time and provide reasonablyreasonable stable, current income for stockholders through the payment of cash distributions;distributions. We expect to adapt our investment strategy over time in order to respond to evolving market conditions and
to provide the opportunity to participate in capital appreciationcapitalize on investment opportunities that may arise at different points in the valueeconomic and real estate investment cycle.
Investment Guidelines
Our manager and our Investment Advisor are required to manage our business in accordance with certain investment guidelines that were adopted by the valuation, compensation and affiliate transactions committee of our investments.Board, which include:

not making investments that would cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT under the Code;
5

Table of Contents


Our charter requiresnot making any investment that our independent directors review our investment policies, described below, at least annually to determine that our policies are in the best interestswould cause us or any of our stockholders. Exceptsubsidiaries to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”);
our manager seeking to invest our capital in a broad range of investments in or relating to real property and real estate-related credit assets and our Investment Advisor seeking to invest in real estate and corporate credit-related securities;
prior to the extent thatdeployment or redeployment of capital, permitting the manager or our Investment Advisor to cause the capital to be invested in short-term investments in money market funds, bank accounts, overnight repurchase agreements with primary federal reserve bank dealers collateralized by direct U.S. government obligations, and other instruments and investments reasonably determined to be of high quality; and
not making any (i) individual or single pooled commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) investment policiesor corporate loan investment in excess of $250 million, (ii) any commercial real estate (“CRE”) loan in excess of $50 million with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 80%, and limitations are included(iii) any other type of investment, including but not limited to commercial real estate acquisitions, in our charter, our boardexcess of directors may revise our investment policies$200 million, without the approval of our stockholders. Investment policies that are provided in our charter may only be amended by a vote of stockholders holding a majority of the Board or a duly constituted committee of the Board.
Types of Investments — Commercial Real Estate Related Credit Investments
Our investment strategy includes acquiring and originating credit investments, including commercial mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity, and other loans and securities related to commercial real estate assets, as well as corporate loan opportunities that are consistent with our outstanding shares, unlessinvestment strategy and objectives:
Commercial Mortgage Loans. We will invest in, acquire or originate loans secured by a first mortgage lien on commercial properties providing mortgage financing to commercial property developers or owners. These loans will generally have maturity dates ranging from three to ten years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate, though they are more likely going to be floating rate and have a shorter-duration term. The loans will likely require interest only payments and if these loans do
6

Table of Contents

provide for some amortization, they will typically require, in any event, a balloon payment of principal at maturity. These investments may include whole loan participations and/or pari passu participations within such loans.
Mezzanine Loans. We also expect to invest in or originate loans made to commercial property owners that are secured by pledges of the amendmentsborrower’s ownership interests in the property and/or the property owner, subordinate to whole mortgage loans secured by a first lien on the property. These mortgage loans are senior to the borrower’s equity in the property. These loans may be tranched into senior and junior mezzanine loans, with junior mezzanine loans secured by a pledge of the equity interests in the more junior mezzanine borrower. Mezzanine lenders typically have different, and at times more limited, rights compared to more senior lenders, including, following a default on the senior loan, the right, for a period of time, to cure defaults under the senior loan and any senior mezzanine loan and purchase the senior loan and any senior mezzanine loan. Subject to the terms negotiated with, and the rights of, the senior lenders, mezzanine lenders typically have the right to foreclose on their equity interest and become the direct or indirect owner of the property.
Other Real Estate Related Debt Instruments. We will opportunistically invest in or originate other commercial real estate-related debt instruments such as subordinated mortgage interests, preferred equity, note financing, unsecured loans to owners and operators of real estate assets, and secured real estate-related securities such as CMBS and commercial real estate collateralized loan obligations (“CRE CLOs”).
Corporate Loans. We may also invest in or originate certain syndicated corporate loans, often but not necessarily of real estate operating or finance companies.
We will evaluate our credit investment opportunities to ensure that they are in compliance with our investment guidelines, do not adversely affectcause us to lose our qualification as a REIT under the rights, preferences and privilegesCode or cause us or any of our stockholders.subsidiaries to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
AcquisitionIn evaluating prospective loan or other credit investments, CMFT Management will consider factors such as the following:
the condition and Investment Policiesuse of the collateral securing the loan;
current and projected cash flows of the collateral securing the loan;
expected levels of rental and occupancy rates of the property securing the loan;
the potential for increased expenses and capital expense requirements;
the loan to value ratio of the investment;
the debt service coverage ratio of the investment;
the degree of liquidity of the investment;
the quality, experience and creditworthiness of the borrower;
general economic conditions in the area where the collateral is located;
the strength and structure and loan covenants; and
other factors that CMFT Management believes are relevant.
Because the factors considered, including the specific weight we place on each factor, will vary for each prospective investment, we do not, and are not able to, assign a specific weight or level of importance to any particular factor.
Outside of our investment guidelines, we do not have any policies directing the portion of our assets that may be invested in any particular asset type. However, we recognize that certain types of loans, such as mezzanine loans, are subject to more risk than others, such as loans secured by first deeds of trust or first priority mortgages on income-producing, fee-simple properties. CMFT Management will evaluate the risk associated with a loan when evaluating its decision to invest, and in determining the rate of interest on the loan.
Our credit investments may be subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities and subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing various requirements and restrictions, including among other things, regulating credit granting activities, establishing maximum interest rates and finance charges, requiring disclosures to customers, governing secured transactions and setting collection, repossession and claims handling procedures and other trade practices. In addition, certain states have enacted legislation requiring the licensing of mortgage bankers or other lenders and these requirements may affect our ability to effectuate our proposed investments in loans. Commencement of operations in these or other jurisdictions may be dependent upon a finding of our financial responsibility, character and fitness. We may determine not to make loans in any jurisdiction in which the regulatory authority determines that we have not complied in all material respects with applicable requirements.
7

Table of Contents

Types of Investments — Commercial Real Estate Property Investments
We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, income-producing necessity retail properties that are primarily single-tenant properties, or anchored shopping centers, which are leased to national and regional creditworthy tenants under long-term net leases, and are strategically located throughout the United States. We consider necessity retail properties to be properties leased to retail tenants that attract consumers for everyday needs, such as pharmacies, home improvement stores, national superstores, restaurants and regional retailers. AnchoredOur portfolio also includes anchored shopping centers, which are multi-tenant properties that are anchored by one or more large national, regional or local retailers.
We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, other income-producing properties, such as office and industrial properties, which may share certain core characteristics with our retail investments, such as a principal creditworthy tenant, a long-term net lease, and a strategic location. We believe acquisitions of these types of office and industrial properties, which are essential to the business operations of the tenant, are consistent with our goal of providing stockholders with a stable stream of current income and an opportunity for capital appreciation.
Many of our properties are, and we anticipate that future properties will be, leased to tenants in the chain or franchise retail industry, including, but not limited to, convenience stores, drug stores and restaurant properties, as well as leased to large national retailers as standalonestand-alone properties or as part of anchored shopping centers, which are anchored by national, regional and local retailers. CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management monitors industry trends and identifies properties on our behalf that serve to provide a favorable return balanced with risk. Our management primarily targets regional or national name brand retail businesses with established track records. We generally intend to hold each property for a period in excess of sevenfive years.
By acquiring a large number of properties, we believe that lower than expected results of operations from one or a few investments will not necessarily preclude our ability to realize our investment objective of generating cash flowflows from our overall portfolio. In addition, we believe that properties under long-term triple-net and double-net leases offer a distinct investment advantage since these properties generally require less management and operating capital, have less recurring tenant turnover and, with respect to single-tenant properties, often offer superior locations that are less dependent on the financial stability of adjoining tenants. Since we acquire properties that are geographically diverse, we expect to minimize the potential adverse impact of economic slowdowns or downturns in local markets.
To the extent feasible, we seek to achieve a well-balanced portfolio diversified by geographic location, age and lease maturities of the various properties. We pursue properties leased to tenants representing a variety of retail industries to avoid concentration in any one industry. We also are diversified between national, regional and local brands. We generally target properties with lease terms in excess of ten years. We have acquired and may continue to acquire properties with shorter lease terms if the property is in an attractive location, if the property is difficult to replace, or if the property has other significant favorable attributes. We expect that these acquisitions will provide long-term value by virtue of their size, location, quality and condition, and lease characteristics.
There is no limitation on the number, size or type of properties that we may acquire, or on the percentage of net proceeds of the Offerings that may be used to acquire a single property. The number and mix of properties comprising our portfolio will depend upon real estate market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time we acquire properties. We will not forgo acquiring a high-quality asset because it does not precisely fit our expected portfolio composition. See “— Other Possible Investments” below for a description of other types of real estate and real estate-related investments we may make.
We incur debt to acquire properties when CR IV Advisors determines that incurring such debt is in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders. In addition, from time to time, we have acquired and may continue to acquire some properties without financing and later incur mortgage debt secured by one or more of such properties if favorable financing terms are available. We use the proceeds from these loans to acquire additional properties. See “— Borrowing Policies” below for a more detailed description of our borrowing intentions and limitations.

6

Table of Contents


Real Estate Underwriting Process
In evaluating potential property acquisitions consistent with our investment objectives, CR IV Advisors applies a well-established underwriting process to determine the creditworthiness of potential tenants. We consider a tenant to be creditworthy if we believe that the tenant has sufficient assets, cash flow generation and stability of operations to meet its obligations under the lease. Similarly, CR IV Advisors applies credit underwriting criteria to possible new tenants when we are leasing properties in our portfolio. Many of the tenants of our properties are, and we expect will continue to be, national or regional retail chains that are creditworthy entities having high net worth and operating income. CR IV Advisors’ underwriting process includes analyzing the financial data and other available information about the tenant, such as income statements, balance sheets, net worth, cash flow, business plans, data provided by industry credit rating services, and/or other information CR IV Advisors may deem relevant. Generally, these tenants must have a proven track record in order to meet the credit tests applied by CR IV Advisors. In addition, we may obtain guarantees of leases by the corporate parent of the tenant, in which case CR IV Advisors will analyze the creditworthiness of the guarantor. In many instances, especially in sale-leaseback situations where we are acquiring a property from a company and simultaneously leasing it back to the company under a long-term lease, we will meet with the tenant’s senior management to discuss the company’s business plan and strategy.
When using debt rating agencies, a tenant typically will be considered creditworthy when the tenant has an “investment grade” debt rating by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) of Baa3 or better, credit rating by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“Standard & Poor’s”) of BBB- or better, or its payments are guaranteed by a company with such rating. Changes in tenant credit ratings, coupled with future acquisition and disposition activity, may increase or decrease our concentration of creditworthy tenants in the future.
Moody’s ratings are forward-looking opinions of future relative creditworthiness, which consider, but are not limited to, franchise value, financial statement analysis and management quality. The rating given to a debt obligation describes the level of risk associated with receiving full and timely payment of principal and interest on that specific debt obligation and how that risk compares with that of all other debt obligations. The rating, therefore, provides one measure of the ability of a company to generate cash in the future.
A Moody’s debt rating of Baa3, which is the lowest investment grade rating given by Moody’s, is assigned to companies which, in Moody’s opinion, are subject to moderate credit risk and, as such, may possess certain speculative characteristics. A Moody’s debt rating of AAA, which is the highest investment grade rating given by Moody’s, is assigned to companies which, in Moody’s opinion, are of the highest quality and subject to the lowest level of credit risk.
Standard & Poor’s assigns a credit rating to companies and to each issuance or class of debt issued by a rated company. A Standard & Poor’s credit rating of BBB-, which is the lowest investment grade rating given by Standard & Poor’s, is assigned to companies that, in Standard & Poor’s opinion, exhibit adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the company to meet its financial commitments. A Standard & Poor’s credit rating of AAA+, which is the highest investment grade rating given by Standard & Poor’s, is assigned to companies that, in Standard & Poor’s opinion, have extremely strong capacities to meet their financial commitments.
While we will utilize ratings by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s as one factor in determining whether a tenant is creditworthy, CR IV Advisors also considers other factors in determining whether a tenant is creditworthy for the purpose of meeting our investment objectives. CR IV Advisors’ underwriting process considers information provided by third-party analytical services, such as Moody’s CreditEdge, along with CR IV Advisors’ own analysis of the financial condition of the tenant and/or the guarantor, the operating history of the property with the tenant, the tenant’s market share and track record within the tenant’s industry segment, the general health and outlook of the tenant’s industry segment, the strength of the tenant’s management team and the terms and length of the lease at the time of the acquisition.
Description of Leases
We expect, in most instances, to continue to acquire tenant properties with existing double-net or triple-net leases. “Net” leases meansmean leases that typically require tenants to pay all or a majority of the operating expenses, including real estate taxes, special assessments and sales and use taxes, utilities, maintenance, insurance and building repairs related to the property, in addition to the lease payments. Triple-net leases typically require the tenant to pay all costs associated with a property in addition to the base rent(e.g., real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance and percentage rent, if any,repairs, including capital expenditures for the roof, structure and the building structure.parking lot). Double-net leases typically hold the landlord responsible for the capital expenditures for the roof and structure, while the tenant is responsible for all lease payments and remaining operating expenses associated with the property. Double-netproperty (e.g., real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance). We believe that properties under long-term triple-net and double-net leases offer a distinct investment advantage since these properties generally require less management and operating capital, have less recurring tenant turnover and, with respect to single-tenant properties, often offer superior locations that are less dependent on the financial stability of adjoining tenants. We expect that double-net and triple-net leases will help ensure the predictability and stability of our expenses, which we believe will result in greater predictability and stability of our cash distributions to stockholders. Not all of our properties are, or will be subject to, net leases. In respect of anchored shopping centers, we expect to continue to have a variety of lease arrangements with the tenants of these properties.

7

Table of Contents


Since each lease is an individually negotiated contract between two or more parties, each lease will have different obligations of both the landlord and tenant. Many large national tenants have standard lease forms that generally do not vary from property to property. We will have limited ability to revise the terms of leases to those tenants. We have acquired and may continue to acquire properties with tenants subject to “gross” leases. “Gross” leases means leases that typically require the tenant to pay a flat rental amount and we would pay for all property charges regularly incurred as a result of our owning the property. When spaces in a property become vacant, existing leases expire, or we acquire properties under development or requiring substantial refurbishment or renovation, we generally expect to enter into “net”net leases.
There is no limitation on the number, size or type of properties that we may acquire, or on the percentage of net proceeds of the Offerings that may be used to acquire a single property. The number and mix of properties comprising our portfolio will depend upon real estate market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time we acquire properties, and the amount of capital we have available for acquisitions. We generally expectwill not forgo acquiring a high-quality asset because it does not precisely fit our expected portfolio composition. See “— Other Possible Investments” below for a description of other types of real estate and real estate-related investments we may make.
We incur debt to enter into long-term leasesacquire properties when CMFT Management determines that incurring such debt is in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders. In addition, from time to time, we have terms of ten years or more; however, certain leases may have a shorter term. Weacquired and may continue to acquire some
8

Table of Contents

properties without financing and later incur mortgage debt secured by one or more of such properties if favorable financing terms are available. We use the proceeds from these loans to acquire additional properties. See “— Financing Strategy” below for a more detailed description of our borrowing intentions and limitations.
Underwriting Process
In evaluating potential property acquisitions consistent with our investment objectives, CMFT Management applies a well-established underwriting process to determine the creditworthiness of potential tenants. We consider a tenant to be creditworthy if we believe that the tenant has sufficient assets, cash flow generation and stability of operations to meet its obligations under which the lease term has partially expired. We also may acquirelease. Similarly, CMFT Management applies credit underwriting criteria to possible new tenants when we are leasing properties with shorter lease terms if the property is in an attractive location, if the property is difficult to replace, or if the property has other significant favorable real estate attributes. Under most commercial leases, tenants are obligated to pay a predetermined annual base rent. Someour portfolio. Many of the leases also contain provisions that increase the amount of base rent payable at points during the lease term. We expect that manytenants of our leasesproperties are, and we expect will continue to contain periodic rent increases.be, national or regional retail chains that are creditworthy entities having high net worth and operating income. CMFT Management’s underwriting process includes analyzing the financial data and other available information about the tenant, such as income statements, balance sheets, net worth, cash flows, business plans, data provided by industry credit rating services, and/or other information CMFT Management may deem relevant. Generally, these tenants must have a proven track record in order to meet the leases require each tenant to procure, at its own expense, commercial general liability insurance, as well as property insurance covering the building for the full replacement value and naming the ownership entity and the lender, if applicable, as the additional insured on the policy. Tenants will be required to provide proof of insurancecredit tests applied by furnishing evidence of insurance to CR IV Advisors on an annual basis. The evidence of insurance will be tracked and reviewed for compliance by CR IV Advisors personnel responsible for property and risk management. As a precautionary measure,CMFT Management. In addition, we may obtain toguarantees of leases by the extent available, secondary liability insurance, as well as losscorporate parent of rents insurance that will typically cover one year of annual rent in the event of a rental loss.
Some leases may require that we procure insurance for both commercial general liability and property damage; however, generally the premiums are fully reimbursable from the tenant. In such instances, the policy will list us as the named insured and the tenant, asin which case CMFT Management will analyze the additional insured.
We do not expect to allow leases to be assigned or subleased without our prior written consent. If we do consent to an assignment or sublease, we generally expect the terms of such consent to provide that the original tenant remains fully liable under the lease unless we release that original tenant from its obligations.
We may enter into sale-leaseback transactions, pursuant to which we purchase properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. While we intend to use our best efforts to structure any such sale-leaseback transaction so that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease” and so that we are treated as the ownercreditworthiness of the property for federal income tax purposes, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) could challenge this characterization. In the event that any sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized as a financing transaction for federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed, and in certain circumstances, we could lose our REIT status.corporate parent.
Acquisition Decisions
CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management has substantial discretion with respect to the selection of our specific acquisitions, subject to our investment and borrowing policies, which are approved by our board of directors.guidelines. In pursuing our investment objectives and making investment decisions on our behalf, CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management evaluates the proposed terms of the acquisition against all aspects of the transaction, including the condition and financial performance of the asset, the terms of existing leases and the creditworthiness of the tenant, and property location and characteristics. Because the factors considered, including the specific weight we place on each factor, vary for each potential acquisition, we do not, and are not able to, assign a specific weight or level of importance to any particular factor.
CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management procures and reviews an independent valuation estimate on each and every proposed acquisition. In addition, CR IV Advisors,CMFT Management, to the extent such information is available, considers the following:
tenant rolls and tenant creditworthiness;
a property condition report;
unit level store performance;
property location, visibility and access;
age of the property, physical condition and curb appeal;
neighboring property uses;
local market conditions including vacancy rates and market rents;
area demographics, including trade area population and average household income;
neighborhood growth patterns and economic conditions;

8

Table of Contents


presence of nearby properties that may positively or negatively impact store sales at the subject property; and
lease terms, including length of lease term, scope of landlord responsibilities, presence and frequency of contractual rental increases, renewal option provisions, exclusive and permitted use provisions, co-tenancy requirements and termination options.
CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management also reviews the terms of each existing lease by considering various factors, including:
rent escalations;
remaining lease term;
renewal option terms;
tenant purchase options;
termination options;
scope of the landlord’s maintenance, repair and replacement requirements;
projected net cash flow yield; and
projected internal rates of return.
Our board of directorsThe Board has adopted a policy to prohibit acquisitions from affiliates of CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management unless a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction determine that the
9

Table of Contents

transaction is fair and reasonable to us and certain other conditions are met. See the section captioned “— Acquisition of Properties from Affiliates of CR IV Advisors”CMFT Management” below.
Conditions to Closing Our Acquisitions
Generally, we condition our obligation to close the purchase of any acquisition on the delivery and verification of certain documents from the seller or developer, including, where appropriate:
plans and specifications;
surveys;
evidence that title to the property can be freely sold or otherwise transferred to us, subject to such liens and encumbrances as are acceptable to CR IV Advisors;
financial statements covering recent operations of properties, if available;
title and liability insurance policies; and
certificates of the tenant attesting that the tenant believes that, among other things, the lease is valid and enforceable.
In addition, we will take such steps as we deem necessary with respect to potential environmental matters. See the section captioned “Environmental Matters” below.
We have and may continue to enter into purchase and sale arrangements with a seller or developer of a suitable property under development or construction. In such cases, we are obligated to purchase the property at the completion of construction, provided that the construction conforms to definitive plans, specifications, and costs approved by us in advance. In such cases, prior to our acquiring the property, we generally receive a certificate of an architect, engineer or other appropriate party, stating that the property complies with all plans and specifications. If renovation or remodeling is required prior to the purchase of a property, we expect to pay a negotiated maximum amount to the seller upon completion.
In determining whether to purchase a particular property, we may, in accordance with customary practices, obtain an option to purchase such property. The amount paid for an option, if any, normally is forfeited if the property is not purchased and credited against the purchase price if the property is purchased. 
In the purchasing, leasing and developingdevelopment of properties, we are subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate. Refer to Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors — General Risks Related to Acquisitions of Real Estate Assets in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Ownership Structure
Our real estate acquisitions generally take the form of holding fee title or a long-term leasehold estate. We have acquired, and expect to continue to acquire, such interests either directly through our operating partnership or indirectly through limited liability companies, limited partnerships or other entities owned and/or controlled by us or our operating partnership. We have acquired and may continue to acquire properties by acquiring the entity that holds the desired properties. We also have acquired

9

Table of Contents


and may continue to acquire properties through investments in joint ventures, partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with third parties, including the developers of the properties or affiliates of CR IV Advisors. See the section captioned “— Joint Ventures” below.
Joint Ventures
We have entered, and may continue to enter into, joint ventures, partnerships, co-tenancies and other co-ownership arrangements with affiliated entities of CR IV Advisors, including other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, or other affiliates of CR IV Advisors, and other third parties for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties or the acquisition of other real estate-related assets. We may also enter into such arrangements with real estate developers, owners and other unaffiliated third parties for the purpose of developing, owning and operating real properties. In determining whether to participate in a particular joint venture, CR IV Advisors will evaluate the underlying real property or other real estate-related asset using the same criteria described above in “— Acquisition Decisions.” CR IV Advisors also will evaluate the joint venture or co-ownership partner and the proposed terms of the joint venture or a co-ownership arrangement.
Our general policy is to invest in joint ventures only when we will have an option or contract to purchase, or a right of first refusal to purchase, the property held by the joint venture or the co-venturer’s interest in the joint venture if the co-venturer elects to sell such interest. In the event that the co-venturer elects to sell all or a portion of the interests held in any such joint venture, however, we may not have sufficient funds to exercise our right of first refusal to buy the other co-venturer’s interest in the joint venture. In the event that any joint venture with an affiliated entity holds interests in more than one asset, the interest in each such asset may be specially allocated between us and the joint venture partner based upon the respective proportion of funds deemed contributed by each co-venturer in each such asset.
In the event we enter into a joint venture or other co-ownership arrangements with CIM or its affiliates or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CCO Group, CR IV Advisors’ officers, key persons and affiliates may have conflicts of interest. The co-venturer may have economic or business interests or goals that are or may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals. In addition, CR IV Advisors’ officers and key persons may face a conflict in structuring the terms of the relationship between our interests and the interests of any affiliated co-venturer and in managing the joint venture. Since some or all of CR IV Advisors’ officers and key persons may also advise the affiliated co-venturer, agreements and transactions between us and CIM or any other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group would not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers, which may result in the co-venturer receiving benefits greater than the benefits that we receive. In addition, we may assume liabilities related to the joint venture that exceed the percentage of our contribution to the joint venture.
We may enter into joint ventures with CIM, other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, CR IV Advisors, one or more of our directors, or any of their respective affiliates, but only if a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction approve the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us and on substantially the same terms and conditions as those received by unaffiliated joint venturers, and the cost of our investment must be supported by a current third-party appraisal of the asset.
Development and Construction of Properties
We have acquired and may continue to acquire properties on which improvements are to be constructed or completed or which require substantial renovation or refurbishment. We expect that joint ventures would be the exclusive vehicle through which we would invest in build-to-suit property projects. Our general policy is to structure them as follows:
we may enter into a joint venture with third parties who have an executed lease with the developer who has an executed lease in place with the future tenant whereby we will provide a portion of the equity or debt financing;
we would accrue a preferred return during construction on any equity investment;
the properties would be developed by third parties; and
consistent with our general policy regarding joint ventures, we would have an option or contract to purchase, or a right of first refusal to purchase, the property or the co-investor’s interest.
It is possible that joint venture partners may resist granting us a right of first refusal or may insist on a different methodology for unwinding the joint venture if one of the parties wishes to liquidate its interest.
In the event that we elect to engage in development or construction projects, in order to help ensure performance by the builders of properties that are under construction, completion of such properties will be guaranteed at the contracted price by a completion guaranty, completion bond or performance bond. CR IV Advisors may rely upon the substantial net worth of the contractor or developer or a personal guarantee accompanied by financial statements showing a substantial net worth provided

10

Table of Contents


by an affiliate of the person entering into the construction or development contract as an alternative to a completion bond or performance bond. Development of real estate properties is subject to risks relating to a builder’s ability to control construction costs or to build in conformity with plans, specifications and timetables. Refer to Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors — General Risks Related to Acquisitions of Real Estate in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Dispositions. We have and may continue to make periodic progress payments or other cash advances to developers and builders of our properties prior to completion of construction, but only upon receipt of an architect’s certification as to the percentage of the project then completed and as to the dollar amount of the construction then completed. We intend to use such additional controls on disbursements to builders and developers as we deem necessary or prudent. We have and may continue to directly employ one or more project managers, including CR IV Advisors or an affiliate of CR IV Advisors, to plan, supervise and implement the development of any unimproved properties that we may acquire. Such persons would be compensated directly by us or through an affiliate of CR IV Advisors and reimbursed by us. In either event, the compensation would reduce the amount of any construction fee, development fee or acquisition fee that we would otherwise pay to CR IV Advisors or its affiliate.
In addition, we have and may continue to acquire unimproved properties, provided that we will not invest more than 10% of our total assets in unimproved properties or invest in mortgage loans secured by such properties. We will consider a property to be an unimproved property if it was not acquired for the purpose of producing rental or other operating cash flows, has no development or construction in process at the time of acquisition and no development or construction is planned to commence within one year of the acquisition.
Other Possible Investments
Although we have acquired and expect to continue to acquire primarily real estate assets, our portfolio may also include other real estate-related assets, such as mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans and securities related to real estate assets, frequently, but not necessarily always, in the corporate sector; however, we do not intend for such real estate-related assets to constitute a significant portion of our asset portfolio; and we will evaluate our assets to ensure that any such investments do not cause us to lose our REIT status, cause us or any of our subsidiaries to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), or cause our advisor to have assets under management that could require our advisor to register as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. We may make adjustments to our target portfolio based on real estate market conditions, capital raised, financing secured and investment opportunities. Thus, to the extent that CR IV Advisors presents us with high quality investment opportunities that allow us to meet the REIT requirements under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), and do not cause us, our operating partnership or any other subsidiaries to meet the definition of an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, our portfolio composition may vary from what we initially expect. Our board of directors has broad discretion to change our investment policies in order for us to achieve our investment objectives.
Investing in and Originating Loans. The criteria that CR IV Advisors will use in making or investing in loans on our behalf are substantially the same as those involved in acquiring properties for our portfolio. We do not intend to make loans to other persons, to underwrite securities of other issuers or to engage in the purchase and sale of any types of investments other than those relating to real estate. However, unlike our property acquisitions, which we expect to hold in excess of seven years, we expect that the average duration of loans will typically be one to five years.
We do not expect to make or invest in loans that are not directly or indirectly secured by real estate. We will not make or invest in mortgage loans on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loan, would exceed an amount equal to 85% of the appraised value of the property, as determined by an independent third-party appraiser, unless we find substantial justification due to other underwriting criteria. We may find such justification in connection with the purchase of loans in cases in which we believe there is a high probability of our foreclosure upon the property in order to acquire the underlying assets and in which the cost of the loan investment does not exceed the fair market value of the underlying property. We will not invest in or make loans unless an appraisal has been obtained concerning the underlying property, except for those loans insured or guaranteed by a government or government agency. In cases in which a majority of our independent directors so determine, and in the event the transaction is with CCO Group, CR IV Advisors, any of our directors or their respective affiliates, the appraisal will be obtained from a certified independent appraiser in order to support its determination of fair market value.
We may invest in first, second and third mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, bridge loans, wraparound mortgage loans, construction mortgage loans on real property and loans on leasehold interest mortgages. However, we will not make or invest in any loans that are subordinate to any mortgage or equity interest of CCO Group, CR IV Advisors, any of our directors or any of their or our affiliates. We also may invest in participations in mortgage loans. A mezzanine loan is a loan made in respect of certain real property but is secured by a lien on the ownership interests of the entity that, directly or indirectly, owns the real

11

Table of Contents


property. A bridge loan is short-term financing for an individual or business, until permanent or the next stage of financing can be obtained. Second mortgage and wraparound loans are secured by second or wraparound deeds of trust on real property that is already subject to prior mortgage indebtedness. A wraparound loan is one or more junior mortgage loans having a principal amount equal to the outstanding balance under the existing mortgage loan, plus the amount actually to be advanced under the wraparound mortgage loan. Under a wraparound loan, we would generally make principal and interest payments on behalf of the borrower to the holders of the prior mortgage loans. Third mortgage loans are secured by third deeds of trust on real property that is already subject to prior first and second mortgage indebtedness. Construction loans are loans made for either original development or renovation of property. Construction loans in which we would generally consider an investment would be secured by first deeds of trust on real property for terms of six months to two years. Loans on leasehold interests are secured by an assignment of the borrower’s leasehold interest in the particular real property. These loans are generally for terms of six months to 15 years. The leasehold interest loans are either amortized over a period that is shorter than the lease term or have a maturity date prior to the date the lease terminates. These loans would generally permit us to cure any default under the lease. Participations in mortgage loans are investments in partial interests of mortgages of the type described above that are made and administered by third-party mortgage lenders.
In evaluating prospective loan investments, CR IV Advisors will consider factors such as the following:
the ratio of the investment amount to the underlying property’s value;
the property’s potential for capital appreciation;
expected levels of rental and occupancy rates;
the condition and use of the property;
current and projected cash flow of the property;
potential for rent increases;
the degree of liquidity of the investment;
the property’s income-producing capacity;
the quality, experience and creditworthiness of the borrower;
general economic conditions in the area where the property is located;
in the case of mezzanine loans, the ability to acquire the underlying real property; and
other factors that CR IV Advisors believes are relevant.
In addition, we will seek to obtain a customary lender’s title insurance policy or commitment as to the priority of the mortgage or condition of the title. Because the factors considered, including the specific weight we place on each factor, will vary for each prospective loan investment, we do not, and are not able to, assign a specific weight or level of importance to any particular factor.
We may originate loans from mortgage brokers or personal solicitations of suitable borrowers, or may purchase existing loans that were originated by other lenders. CR IV Advisors will evaluate all potential loan investments to determine if the security for the loan and the loan-to-value ratio meets our investment criteria and objectives. Most loans that we will consider for investment would provide for monthly payments of interest and some may also provide for principal amortization, although many loans of the nature that we will consider provide for payments of interest only and a payment of principal in full at the end of the loan term. We will not originate loans with negative amortization provisions.
We do not have any policies directing the portion of our assets that may be invested in construction loans, mezzanine loans, bridge loans, loans secured by leasehold interests and second, third and wraparound mortgage loans. However, we recognize that these types of loans are more subject to risk than first deeds of trust or first priority mortgages on income-producing, fee-simple properties, and we expect to minimize the amount of these types of loans in our portfolio, to the extent that we make or invest in loans at all. CR IV Advisors will evaluate the fact that these types of loans are riskier in determining the rate of interest on the loans. We do not have any policy that limits the amount that we may invest in any single loan or the amount we may invest in loans to any one borrower. We are not limited as to the amount of gross offering proceeds that we may use to invest in or originate loans.
Our loan investments may be subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities and subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing various requirements and restrictions, including among other things, regulating credit granting activities, establishing maximum interest rates and finance charges, requiring disclosures to customers, governing secured transactions and setting collection, repossession and claims handling procedures and other trade practices. In addition, certain states have enacted legislation requiring the licensing of mortgage bankers or other lenders and these requirements may affect our ability to effectuate our proposed investments in loans. Commencement of operations in these or

12

Table of Contents


other jurisdictions may be dependent upon a finding of our financial responsibility, character and fitness. We may determine not to make loans in any jurisdiction in which the regulatory authority determines that we have not complied in all material respects with applicable requirements.
Investment in Other Real Estate-Related Securities. To the extent permitted by Section V.D.2 of the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts adopted by the North American Securities Administrators Association (the “NASAA REIT Guidelines”), and subject to the limitations set forth in our charter, we may invest in common and preferred real estate-related equity securities of both publicly traded and private real estate companies. Real estate-related equity securities are generally unsecured and also may be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. Our investments in real estate-related equity securities will involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the equity securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer.
We may also make investments in commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”) to the extent permitted by the NASAA REIT Guidelines. CMBS are securities that evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. CMBS are generally pass-through certificates that represent beneficial ownership interests in common law trusts whose assets consist of defined portfolios of one or more commercial mortgage loans. They are typically issued in multiple tranches whereby the more senior classes are entitled to priority distributions from the trust’s income. Losses and other shortfalls from expected amounts to be received on the mortgage pool are borne by the most subordinate classes, which receive payments only after the more senior classes have received all principal and/or interest to which they are entitled. CMBS are subject to all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans. We may invest in investment grade and non-investment grade CMBS classes. Our board of directors has adopted a policy to limit any investments in non-investment grade CMBS to not more than 10% of our total assets.
Borrowing Policies
CR IV Advisors believes that utilizing borrowings to make acquisitions is consistent with our investment objective of maximizing the return to stockholders. By operating on a leveraged basis, we have more funds available for acquiring properties. This allows us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, potentially resulting in a more diversified portfolio.
At the same time, CR IV Advisors believes in utilizing leverage in a moderate fashion. While there is no limitation on the amount we may borrow against any single improved property, our charter limits our aggregate borrowings to 75% of the cost of our gross assets (or 300% of net assets) (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) unless excess borrowing is approved by a majority of the independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in the next quarterly report along with the justification for such excess borrowing. Consistent with CR IV Advisors’ approach toward the moderate use of leverage, our board of directors has adopted a policy to further limit our borrowings to 60% of the greater of cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) or fair market value of our gross assets, unless excess borrowing is approved by a majority of the independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in the next quarterly report along with a justification for such excess borrowing. Our advisor has set a target leverage ratio of 40% to 50% of the greater of cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) or fair market value of our gross assets. Fair market value is based on the estimated market value of our real estate assets as of December 31, 2016 used to determine our estimated per share NAV as of such date, and for those assets acquired from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, is based on the purchase price. As of December 31, 2017, our ratio of debt to the cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) of our gross assets was 49.0% (48.9% including adjustment to debt for cash and cash equivalents), and our ratio of debt to the fair market value of our gross assets was 44.3%.
CR IV Advisors uses its best efforts to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available to us. CR IV Advisors has substantial discretion with respect to the financing we obtain, subject to our borrowing policies, which have been approved by our board of directors. Lenders may have recourse to assets not securing the repayment of the indebtedness. CR IV Advisors may elect to refinance properties during the term of a loan, but we expect this would occur only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing mortgage, when an existing mortgage matures or if an attractive asset becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such asset. The benefits of the refinancing may include increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements and an increase in property ownership if some refinancing proceeds are reinvested in real estate.
Our ability to increase our diversification through borrowing may be adversely impacted if banks and other lending institutions reduce the amount of funds available for loans secured by real estate. When interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, we have purchased, and may continue to purchase, properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time. To the extent that we do not obtain mortgage loans on our properties, our ability to acquire additional properties will be restricted and we may not be

13

Table of Contents


able to adequately diversify our portfolio. Refer to Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors — Risks Associated with Debt Financing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We may not borrow money from any of our directors, CCO Group, CR IV Advisors or any of their affiliates unless such loan is approved by a majority of the directors (including a majority of the independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction as fair, competitive and commercially reasonable and no less favorable to us than a comparable loan between unaffiliated parties.
Disposition Policies
We intend to hold each property we acquire for an extended period, generally in excess of sevenfive years. Holding periods for other real estate-related assets may vary. Regardless of intended holding periods, circumstancesCircumstances might arise that could cause us to determine to sell an asset before the end of the expected holding period if we believe the sale of the asset would be in the best interests of our stockholders. The determination of whether a particular asset should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of relevant factors, including prevailing and projected economic conditions, current tenant rolls and tenant creditworthiness, whether we could apply the proceeds from the sale of the asset to acquire other assets, whether disposition of the asset would increase cash flow,flows, and whether the sale of the asset would be a prohibited transaction under the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise impact our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. The selling price of a property that is net leased will be determined in large part by the amount of rent payable under the lease. If a tenant has a repurchase option at a formula price, we may be limited in realizing any appreciation. In connection with our sales of properties, we may lend the purchaser all or a portion of the purchase price. In these instances, our taxable income may exceed the cash received in the sale. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we sold 1530 properties for an aggregate gross sales price of $100.6$270.4 million, resulting in net cash proceeds of $65.9$263.8 million and a gain of $17.0$27.5 million.
AcquisitionFinancing Strategy
CMFT Management believes that utilizing borrowings to make investments is consistent with our investment objective of Properties from Affiliates of CR IV Advisors
We may acquiremaximizing the return to stockholders. By operating on a leveraged basis, we have more funds available for acquiring properties or interestscredit investments. This allows us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, potentially resulting in properties from, ora more diversified portfolio.
The amount of leverage we use is determined by our manager, taking into account a variety of factors, which may include the anticipated liquidity and price volatility of target assets in co-ownership arrangements with, entities affiliated with CR IV Advisors,our investment portfolio, the potential for losses and extension risk in our investment portfolio, the gap between the duration of assets and liabilities, including properties acquired from affiliateshedges, the availability and cost of CR IV Advisors engaged in constructionfinancing the assets, the creditworthiness of our financing counterparties, the health of the global economy and developmentcommercial and residential mortgage markets, the outlook for the level, slope, and volatility of commercial real properties.interest rate movement, the credit quality of our target assets and the type of collateral underlying such target assets. In utilizing leverage, we seek to enhance equity returns while limiting interest rate exposure. We will not acquire any property from an affiliate of CR IV Advisors unless a majorityseek to match the tenor, currency, and indices of our directors (including a majorityassets and liabilities, including in certain instances through the use of derivatives. We will also seek to limit the risks associated with recourse borrowing.
As of December 31, 2020, our ratio of debt to total gross assets net of gross intangible lease liabilities was 46.2% (43.6% including adjustments to debt for cash and cash equivalents), and our ratio of debt to the fair market value of our independent directors) notgross assets was 45.8%.
Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, from time to time, we engage in hedging transactions that seek to mitigate the effects of fluctuations in interest rates or currencies on our cash flows. These hedging transactions could take a variety of forms, including interest rate or currency swaps or cap agreements, options, futures contracts, forward rate or currency agreements or similar financial instruments.
Our ability to increase our diversification through borrowing may be adversely impacted if banks and other lending institutions reduce the amount of funds available for borrowing. When interest rates are high or financing is otherwise interested in the transaction determine that the transaction is fairunavailable on a timely basis, our ability to make additional investments will be restricted and reasonable to us. The purchase price that we will pay for any property we acquire from affiliates of CR IV Advisors, including property developed by an affiliate of CR IV Advisors as well as property held by such an affiliate that has already been developed, will not exceed the current appraised value of the property. In addition, the price of the property we acquire from an affiliate of CR IV Advisors may not exceed the cost of the propertybe able to the affiliate, unless a majority ofadequately diversify our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) determine that substantial justification for the excess exists and the excess is reasonable. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we did not purchase any properties from affiliates of our advisor.portfolio. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors — Risks Associated with Debt Financing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Conflicts of Interest
We are subject to various conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management and its affiliates, including conflicts related to the arrangements pursuant to which we will compensate CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management and its affiliates. Certain conflict resolution procedures are set forth in our charter.
The officers and affiliatesAffiliates of CR IV Advisors will tryCMFT Management act as advisors to balance our interests with the interests of CIM and its affiliates and other programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group to whom they owe duties. However, to the extent that these persons take actions that are more favorable to other entities than to us, these actions could have a negative impact on our financial performance and, consequently, on distributions to our stockholders and the value of their investments.
Our independent directors have an obligation to act on our behalf and on behalf of our stockholders in all situations in which a conflict of interest may arise.
As a result of the Services Agreement between VEREIT OP and CCO Group, we are also subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our contractual relationship with VEREIT,Income NAV, Inc. (“VEREIT”CIM Income NAV”), the publicly-traded (NYSE: VER) parent company of VEREIT OP, which also has investment objectives and targeted assets similar to ours. Conflicts of interest will also exist to the extent that we may acquire, or seek to acquire, properties in the same geographic areas where CIM or its affiliates own properties. In addition, our directors and our officers may engage for their own account in business activities of the types conducted or to be conductedis a public, non-listed REIT sponsored by our subsidiaries and us.

14

Table of Contents


Interests in Other Real Estate Programs and Other Concurrent Offerings
Richard S. Ressler, our chief executive officer, president and one of our directors, who is also a founder and principal ofsponsor, CCO Group. CIM and certain of its affiliates and a director of CCIT III and Cole Income NAV Strategy, and Nathan D. DeBacker, our chief financial officer and treasurer, act as executive officers to one or more other programs sponsored by CCO Group. One of our directors, W. Brian Kretzmer, also serves as a director of CCIT III and Cole Income NAV Strategy. In addition, affiliates of CR IV Advisors act as an advisor to, and our chief financial officer and chief executive officer act as executive officers of, CCPT V, CCIT II, CCIT III and/or Cole Income NAV Strategy, all of which are or intend to be public, non-listed REITs distributed and managed by affiliates of CR IV Advisors. In addition, all of these programs primarily focusfocuses on the acquisition and management of commercial properties in the retail, office and industrial sectors subject to long-term net leases to creditworthy tenants and havehas acquired or may acquire assets similar to ours. VEREIT and CCPT V, like us, focus primarily on the retail sector, while CCIT II and CCIT III focus primarily on the office and industrial sectors and Cole Income NAV Strategy focuses primarily on commercial properties in the retail, office and industrial sectors. Nevertheless, the investment strategy used by each REITCIM Income NAV would permit them to purchaseacquire certain properties that may also be suitable for our portfolio.
CCIT II’s initial public offering
10

Table of up to $2.975 billion in sharesContents

Allocation of common stock was declared effective by the SEC on September 17, 2013. CCIT II is no longer offering shares for investment to the public as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Cole Income NAV Strategy’s offerings of up to $4.0 billion in shares of common stock of three classes were declared effective by the SEC on December 6, 2011, August 26, 2013 and February 10, 2017. CCPT V’s initial public offering of up to $2.975 billion in shares of common stock was declared effective by the SEC on March 17, 2014 and terminated on August 1, 2017. CCPT V’s follow-on offering of up to $1.5 billion in shares of common stock was declared effective by the SEC on August 1, 2017. CCIT III’s initial public offering of up to $3.5 billion in shares of common stock of two classes was declared effective by the SEC on September 22, 2016.Investment Opportunities
Other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, including other real estate offerings in registration, could compete with us in the sale or operation of our assets. We will seek to achieve any operating efficiencies or similar savings that may result from affiliated management of competitive assets. However, to the extent such programs own or acquire property that is adjacent, or in close proximity, to a property we own, our property may compete with such other program’s property for tenants or purchasers.
During the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, VEREIT OP will provide property acquisition services to us and CCO Group, and property acquisitionsAcquisition opportunities will be allocated among VEREIT and the real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group pursuant to an asset allocation policy and in accordance with the terms of the Services Agreement. During this period, inadopted by our Board. In the event that an acquisition opportunity has been identified that may be suitable for more than one of us, VEREIT or one or more of the other programs sponsored by CCO Group, and for which more than one of such entities has sufficient uninvested funds, then an allocation committee, which is comprised of employees of VEREIT and employees of CIM, CCO Group or their respective affiliates (the “Allocation Committee”), will examine the following factors, among others, in determining the entity for which the acquisition opportunity is most appropriate:
the investment objective of each entity;
the anticipated operating cash flows of each entity and the cash requirements of each entity;
the effect of the acquisition both on diversification of each entity’s investments by type of property, geographic area and tenant concentration;
the amount of funds available to each program and the length of time such funds have been available to deploy;
the policy of each entity relating to leverage of properties;
the income tax effects of the purchase to each entity; and
the size of the investment.
If, in the judgment of the Allocation Committee, the acquisition opportunity may be equally appropriate for more than one program, then the entity that has had the longest period of time elapse since it was allocated an acquisition opportunity of a similar size and type (e.g., office, industrial or retail properties) will be allocated such acquisition opportunity.
If a subsequent development, such as a delay in the closing of the acquisition or a delay in the construction of a property, causes any such acquisition opportunity, in the opinion of the Allocation Committee, to be more appropriate for an entity other than the entity that committed to make the acquisition opportunity, the Allocation Committee may determine that VEREIT or another program sponsored by CCO Group will be allocated the acquisition opportunity. Our boardIn the event that our targeted asset types or investment objectives and criteria cause acquisition opportunities that are suitable for programs sponsored by affiliates of directorsCIM other than CCO Group, our manager will utilize an allocation method similar to the one described above for programs sponsored by CCO Group, or will otherwise ensure that a reasonable method of allocation be adopted with respect to such investment opportunities and fairly apply them to us. The Board has a duty to ensure that the method used for the allocation of the acquisition of properties by VEREIT or by other programs sponsored by CCO Group seeking to acquire similar types of properties is applied fairly to us.

15

Table of Contents


In addition, after the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, CIM or its affiliates will have similar responsibilities for allocating acquisition opportunities among CIM and its affiliates, us and the other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, and in such circumstances will accordingly face similar conflicts of interest to those described above with respect to VEREIT OP during the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement.
Although our board of directors has adopted a policy limiting the types of transactions that weWe may enter into certain transactions with CR IV Advisors andCMFT Management or its affiliates, including other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, we may still enter into certain such transactions, which are subject to inherent conflicts of interest. Similarly, joint ventures involving affiliates of CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management also give rise to conflicts of interest. In addition, our board of directorsBoard may encounter conflicts of interest in enforcing our rights against any affiliate of CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management in the event of a default by or disagreement with an affiliate or in invoking powers, rights or options pursuant to any agreement between us and CR IV Advisors,CMFT Management, any of its affiliates or another real estate program sponsored by CCO Group.
Other Activities of CR IV Advisors and Its Affiliates
We rely on our advisor, CR IV Advisors, and, during the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, VEREIT OP, for the day-to-day operation of our business. As a result of the interests of certain members of these entities’ management in CIM or its affiliates, VEREIT and/or other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, and the fact that such persons also are engaged, and will continue to engage, in other business activities, CIM, VEREIT OP, our advisor and their respective officers, key persons and affiliates may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and resources among us, CIM, VEREIT OP, their respective affiliates and other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, as applicable. However, our advisor believes that it, CIM and their respective affiliates, along with VEREIT OP, have sufficient personnel to discharge fully their responsibilities to all of the other programs sponsored or operated by CIM, CCO Group or their respective affiliates, or VEREIT and the other ventures in which they are involved.
Richard S. Ressler, our chief executive officer, president and one of our directors, is also a founder and principal of CIM and an officer/director of certain of its affiliates and a director of CCIT III and Cole Income NAV Strategy. In addition, our chief financial officer and treasurer, Nathan D. DeBacker, is also an officer of other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group. As a result, Messrs. Ressler and DeBacker may owe duties to these other entities and their stockholders or equity owners, as applicable, which may from time to time conflict with the duties that they owe to us and our stockholders.
Dealer Manager
Because CCO Capital, the dealer manager for the Offering, is an affiliate of CR IV Advisors, we did not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by an unaffiliated, independent underwriter in connection with the Offering.
Property Manager
Our properties are, and we anticipate that substantially all properties we acquire in the future will be, managed and leased by our property manager, CREI Advisors, an affiliate of our advisor, pursuant to property management and leasing agreements with our subsidiaries that hold title to our properties. We expect CREI Advisors to also serve as property manager for properties owned by other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, some of which may be in competition with our properties.
Receipt of Fees and Other Compensation by CR IV Advisorspaid to CMFT Management and Its Affiliates
We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, fees and expenses payable to CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management and its affiliates in connection with the acquisition and management of our assets, including acquisitionassets.
Management Agreement. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, in connection with the services provided by our manager, our manager receives a management fee, payable quarterly in arrears, equal to the greater of (a) $250,000 per annum ($62,500 per quarter) and advisory fees, acquisition expenses and operating expenses.
A transaction involving(b) 1.50% per annum (0.375% per quarter) of the purchase or sale of properties, or the purchase or sale of any other real estate-related asset will likely resultCompany’s Equity (as defined in the receipt of fees and other compensation by CR IV Advisors and its affiliates, including acquisition and advisory fees, disposition fees andManagement Agreement). In addition, our manager shall receive Incentive Compensation (as defined in the possibility of subordinated performance fees. Subject to oversight by our board of directors, CR IV Advisors will continue to have considerable discretionManagement Agreement), payable with respect to all decisions relatingeach quarter, which is generally equal to the termsexcess of (a) the product of (i) 20% and timing(ii) the excess of all transactions. Therefore, CR IV Advisors may have conflicts(A) Core Earnings (as defined in the Management Agreement) of interest concerning certain actions taken onthe Company for the previous 12-month period, over (B) the product of (1) the Company’s Consolidated Equity (as defined in the Management Agreement) in the previous 12-month period, and (2) 7% per annum, over (b) the sum of any Incentive Compensation paid to our behalf, particularly duemanager with respect to the fact that acquisition fees will generally be based onfirst three calendar quarters of such previous 12-month period (or such lesser number of completed calendar quarters preceding the cost ofapplicable period, if applicable). Following the acquisition and payable to CR IV Advisors and its affiliates regardless of the quality of the properties acquired. The advisory fees are based on the estimated value of our assets which were acquired prior to the “as of”effective date of the most recent estimated per share NAVManagement Agreement, our manager shall no longer be entitled to receive the Advisory Fee, Acquisition Fees, Subordinated Performance Fee, or Disposition Fees as defined and are based onprovided in the costsprior Advisory Agreement between the Company and the manager dated January 24, 2012; provided, however, that for the Company’s properties under contract to be sold or specifically identified in a broker agreement as being marketed for sale as of the assets acquired subsequent to theeffective date of the most recent estimated per share NAV. Basing acquisition fees and advisory fees onManagement Agreement, the cost or estimated value of our assetsmanager may influence CR IV Advisors’ decisions relatingbe entitled to property acquisitions.

receive a Disposition Fee in
16
11

Table of Contents



accordance with the terms of the prior Advisory Agreement. In addition, our manager generally shall continue to be entitled to reimbursement for costs and expenses to the extent incurred on behalf of the Company in accordance with the Management Agreement; provided, however, that the limits on reimbursement for Organization and Offering Expenses, Acquisition Expenses and Operating Expenses as defined and provided in the Prior Advisory Agreement shall no longer be applicable.
EmployeesThe Management Agreement shall continue for a term of three years and shall be deemed renewed automatically each year thereafter for an additional one-year period unless the Company provides 180 days’ written notice to the manager after the affirmative vote of 2/3 of the Company’s independent directors. If the Management Agreement is terminated without cause, the manager shall receive a termination fee equal to three times the sum of (a) the average annual management fee and (b) the average annual Incentive Compensation during the 24-month period prior to the termination.
Investment Advisory and Management Agreement. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, our Investment Advisor shall receive an investment advisory fee (the “Investment Advisory Fee”), payable quarterly in arrears, equal to (b) 1.50% per annum (0.375% per quarter) of CMFT Securities’ Equity (as defined in the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement). In addition, the Investment Advisor is eligible to receive incentive compensation, as described below. In the event that an Incentive Fee is earned and payable with respect to any quarter under the Management Agreement, our manager will calculate the portion of the Incentive Fee that was attributable to the assets managed by our Investment Advisor and payable to the Investment Advisor. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, CMFT Securities will reimburse the Investment Advisor for costs and expenses incurred by the Investment Advisor on its behalf.
The Investment Advisory and Management Agreement shall continue for a term of three years and shall be deemed renewed automatically each year thereafter for an additional one-year period unless CMFT Securities provides 180 days’ written notice to the Investment Advisor after the affirmative vote of 2/3 of our independent directors, or if the Investment Advisor provides 180 days’ written notice to CMFT Securities. If the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement is terminated without cause by CMFT Securities, the Investment Advisor shall receive a termination fee equal to three times the sum of (a) the average annual Investment Advisory Fee and (b) the average annual Securities Manager Incentive Compensation, as that term is defined in the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, during the 24-month period prior to the termination. CMFT Securities is not required to pay the termination fee if the Investment Advisor terminates the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, or if the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement is terminated for cause.
On a quarterly basis, the Investment Advisor shall designate 50% of the sum of its Investment Advisory Fee and any incentive compensation payable to the Investment Advisor, as described above, as sub-advisory fees. The sub-advisory fees shall be paid by our Investment Advisor ratably, as determined pursuant to the Sub-Advisory Agreement, to the Sub-Advisor and any other sub-advisers, if any, that provide services to CMFT Securities. Either party may terminate the Sub-Advisory Agreement with 30 days’ prior written notice to the other party.
Human Capital Resources
We are operated by affiliates of CIM and have no direct employees. The employeesWe have entered into the Management Agreement with CMFT Management, an affiliate of CR IV AdvisorsCIM, pursuant to which CMFT Management has agreed to provide, or arrange for other service providers to provide, management and its affiliates provideadministrative services to us related to acquisitions and dispositions, property management, asset management, financing, accounting, stockholder relations and administration. The employees of CCO Capital, the dealer manager for the Offering, provided wholesale brokerage services during the Offering.
We are dependent on CR IV Advisors and its affiliates for services that are essential to us, including the sale of shares of our common stock, asset acquisition decisions, property management and other general administrative responsibilities. In the event that these companies are unable to provide these services to us, we would be required to obtain such services from other sources.
We reimburse CR IV Advisors and its affiliates for expenses incurred in connection with its provision of administrative, acquisition, property management, asset management, financing, accounting and stockholder relations services, including personnel costs, subject to certain limitations. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, $10.0 million, $9.7 million and $9.7 million, respectively, were recorded for reimbursement of services provided by CR IV Advisors and its affiliates in connection with the acquisition, management, operating and financing of our assets. No amounts were recorded for the reimbursement of certain third-party and personnel costs allocated in connection with the issuance of shares pursuant to the Offering during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Reportable Segment
We operate on a consolidated basis in our commercial properties segment. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.subsidiaries.
Competition
As we purchase properties, we are in competition with other potential buyers for the same properties and may have to pay more to purchase the property than if there were no other potential acquirers or we may have to locate another property that meets our acquisition criteria. Regarding the leasing efforts of our owned properties, the leasing of real estate is highly competitive in the current market, and we may continue to experience competition for tenants from owners and managers of competing projects. As a result, we may have to provide free rent, incur charges for tenant improvements, or offer other inducements, or we might not be able to timely lease the space, all of which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations. At the time we elect to dispose of our properties, we may also be in competition with sellers of similar properties to locate suitable purchasers for our properties. See the section captioned “— Conflicts of Interest” above.
Property Concentrations
AsSimilarly, in our lending and investing activities, we compete for opportunities with a variety of December 31, 2017, no single tenant accountedinstitutional lenders and investors, including other REITs, specialty finance companies, public and private, commercial and investment banks, commercial finance and insurance companies and other financial institutions. Several other REITs and other investment vehicles have raised significant amounts of capital, and may have investment objectives that overlap with ours, which may create additional competition for greater than 10%lending and investment opportunities. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources, such as the U.S. Government, that are not available to us. Many of our 2017 annualized rental income. Ascompetitors are not subject to the operating constraints associated with REIT compliance or maintenance of December 31, 2017, 77an exclusion from regulation under the Investment Company Act. In addition, some of our properties were located in California, which accounted for 10% of our 2017 annualized rental income. In addition, we have tenants in the discount store and pharmacy industries, which comprised 15% and 10%, respectively, of our 2017 annualized rental income. See Part I, Item 2. Properties of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the geographic concentration of our properties.
Environmental Matters
All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, the presence and release of hazardous substances and the remediation of any associated contamination. Federal, state and local laws in this area are constantly evolving, and we intend to take commercially reasonable steps to protect ourselves from the impact of these laws. We carry environmental liability insurance on our properties that will provide limited coverage for remediation liability and/or pollution liability for third-party bodily injury and/or property damage claims for which we may be liable.
We generally will not purchase any property unless and until we also obtain what is generally referred to as a “Phase I” environmental site assessment and are generally satisfied with the environmental status of the property. However, we may purchase a property without obtaining such assessment if our advisor determines the assessment is not necessary because there exists a recent Phase I environmental site assessment that we deem satisfactory. A Phase I environmental site assessment generally consists of a visual survey of the building and the property in an attempt to identify areas of potential environmental concerns, visually observing neighboring properties to assess surface conditions or activities thatcompetitors may have an adverse environmental impact on the property, interviewing the key site manager and/higher risk tolerances or property owner, contacting local governmental

different risk assessments,
17
12

Table of Contents



agency personnelwhich could allow them to consider a wider variety of loans and performing an environmental regulatory database search in an attempt to determine any known environmental concerns in, and in the immediate vicinity of, the property. A Phase I environmental site assessment does not generally include any sampling or testing of soil, ground water or building materials from the property and may not reveal all environmental hazards on a property.
In the event the Phase I environmental site assessment uncovers potential environmental problems with a property, our advisor will determine whether we will pursue the acquisition opportunity and whether we will have a “Phase II” environmental site assessment performed. The factors we may consider in determining whether to conduct a Phase II environmental site assessment include, but are not limited to, (1) the types of operations conducted on the property and surrounding property, (2) the time, duration and materials used during such operations, (3) the waste handling practices of any tenants or property owners, (4) the potential for hazardous substances to be released into the environment, (5) any history of environmental law violations on the subject property and surrounding properties, (6) any documented environmental releases, (7) any observations from the consultant that conducted the Phase I environmental site assessment, and (8) whether any party (e.g., surrounding property owners, prior owners or tenants) may be responsible for addressing the environmental conditions. We will determine whether to conduct a Phase II environmental site assessment on a case by case basis.
We have acquired and we expect that some of the properties that we acquire in the future may contain, at the time of our acquisition, or may have contained prior to our acquisition, storage tanks for the storage of petroleum products and other hazardous or toxic substances. All of these operations create a potential for the release of petroleum productsinvestments, offer more attractive pricing or other hazardous or toxic substances. Someterms and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, competition for originations of and investments in our target assets may lead to the properties that we acquireyields of such assets decreasing, which may be adjacentfurther limit our ability to or near other properties that have contained or contain storage tanks used to store petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain of the properties that we acquire may be on, or adjacent to or near other properties upon which others, including former owners or tenants of our properties, have engaged, or may in the future engage, in activities that may release petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances.generate satisfactory returns.
From time to time, we may acquire properties, or interests in properties, with known adverse environmental conditions where we believe that the environmental liabilities associated with these conditions are significant and quantifiable but that the acquisition will yield a superior risk-adjusted return. In such an instance, we will estimate the costs of environmental investigation, clean-up and monitoring in determining the purchase price. Further, in connection with property dispositions, we may agree to remain responsible for, and to bear the cost of, remediating or monitoring certain environmental conditions on the properties.
We are not aware of any environmental matters which we believe are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Available Information
We electronically file our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports with the SEC. We have also filedfile registration statements, amendments to our registration statements, and/or supplements to our prospectus in connection with any of our Offeringsofferings with the SEC. Copies of our filings with the SEC are available on our sponsor’s website, http://www.cimgroup.com, free of charge. The information on our sponsor’s website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Copies of our filings with the SEC may also be obtained from the SEC’s website, at http://www.sec.gov. Access to these filings is free of charge.
Supplement To Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
Risk Factor Summary
Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary is for general information purposes only and is not tax advice. This discussion does not address all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to particular holders of our securities in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances.
Recent Legislation
The recently enacted “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”, generally applicable for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, made significant changes to the Code, including a number of provisions of the Coderisks that affect the taxation of businesseswe face and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders.
Among other changes, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made the following changes:
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, (i) the U.S. federal income tax rates on ordinary income of individuals, trusts and estates have been generally reduced and (ii) non-corporate taxpayers are generally permitted to deduct 20% of certain pass-through business income, including dividends received from REITs that are not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, subject to certain limitations.

18

Table of Contents


The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for corporations has been reduced from 35% to 21%, and corporate alternative minimum tax has been eliminated for corporations, which would generally reduce the amount of U.S. federal income tax payable by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) and by us to the extent we were subject to corporate U.S. federal income tax (for example, if we distributed less than 100% of our taxable income or recognized built-in gains in assets acquired from C corporations). In addition, the maximum withholding rate on distributions by us to non-U.S. stockholders that are treated as attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of a U.S. real property interest is reduced from 35% to 21%.
Certain new limitations on the deductibility of interest expense now apply, which limitations may affect the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by us or our TRSs.
Certain new limitations on net operating losses now apply, which limitations may affect net operating losses generated by us or our TRSs.
A U.S. tax-exempt stockholder that is subject to tax on its unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”) will be required to separately compute its taxable income and loss for each unrelated trade or business activity for purposes of determining its UBTI.
New accounting rules generally require us to recognize income items for federal income tax purposes no later than when we take the item into account for financial statement purposes, which may accelerate our recognition of certain income items.
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
Stockholders should carefully consider the following factors,summary, together with the full risk factors contained below in this “Risk Factors” section and all the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating the Company and our business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, and stockholders may lose all or part of their investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.
Risks Related to Our Business
We currently have not identified all of the credit investments, properties or other real estate-related assets we intend to purchase. For this and other reasons, an investment in our shares is speculative.
We currently have not identified all of the properties or real estate-related assets that we may purchase. We have established policies relating to the types of assets we will acquire and the creditworthiness of tenants of our properties, but our advisor has wide discretion in implementing these policies, subject to the oversight of our board of directors. Additionally, our advisor has discretion to determine the location, number and size of our acquisitions and the percentage of net proceeds we may dedicate to a single asset. As a result, you will not be able to evaluate the economic merit of our future acquisitions until after such acquisitions have been made. Therefore, an investment in our shares is speculative.
Our stockholders should consider our prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies that, like us, have not identified all properties or real estate-related assets that they intend to purchase. To be successful in this market, we and our advisor must, among other things:
identify and acquire assets that further our investment objectives;
rely on our advisor and its affiliates to attract, integrate, motivate and retain qualified personnel to manage our day-to-day operations;
respond to competition for our targeted real estate and other investments;
rely on our advisor and its affiliates to continue to build and expand our operations structure to support our business; and
be continuously aware of, and interpret, marketing trends and conditions.
We may not succeed in achieving these goals, and our failure to do so could cause our stockholders to lose all or a portion of their investment.
Our shares have limited liquidity and we are not required, through our charter or otherwise, to provide for a liquidity event. There is no public trading market for our shares and there may never be one; therefore, it will be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares. Our stockholders should view our shares only as a long-term investment.

19

Table of Contents


There is no public market for our common stock, and there may never be one. In addition, although we presently intend to consider alternatives for providing liquidity for our stockholders beginning five to seven years following the termination of our initial public offering, we do not have a fixed date or method for providing stockholders with liquidity. We expect that our board of directors will make that determination in the future based, in part, upon advice from our advisor. If our stockholders are able to find a buyer for their shares, our stockholders will likely have to sell them at a substantial discount to their purchase price. It also is likely that our stockholders’ shares would not be accepted as the primary collateral for a loan. Therefore,one because shares of our common stock shouldwill not be considered illiquidlisted on an exchange for the foreseeable future, if ever, and we are not required to provide for a long-term investment, and our stockholders must be prepared to hold their shares of our common stock for an indefinite length of time.liquidity event.
Our stockholders are limited in their ability to sell their shares pursuant to our share redemption program and may have to hold their shares for an indefinite period of time.
Our share redemption program includes numerous restrictions that limit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares. Subject to funds being available, we will generally limit the number of shares redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program to no more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12 months prior to the end of the fiscal quarter for which the redemption is being paid. In addition, we intend to limit quarterly redemptions to approximately 1.25% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12-month period ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter, and funding for redemptions for each quarter generally will be limited to the net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares in the respective quarter under the DRIP. Any of the foregoing limits might prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any fiscal quarter or in any 12-month period. For the past seven quarters, quarterly redemptions have been honored on a pro rata basis, as we have exceeded the redemption limits described above. Our board of directors may amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate our share redemption program without stockholder approval upon 30 days’ prior notice, and our management may reject any request for redemption. These restrictions severely limit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares should they require liquidity, and limit our stockholders’ ability to recover the value they invested or the fair market value of their shares.
Our estimated per share NAV is an estimate as of a given point in time and likely will not represent the amount of net proceeds that would result if we were liquidated or dissolved or completed a merger or other sale of the Company.sale.
Based on the recommendation from the valuation committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, the board of directors, including all of its independent directors, approves and establishes at least annually an estimated per share NAV of the Company’s common stock, which is based on an estimated market value of the Company’s assets less the estimated market value of the Company’s liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding. The Company provides this estimated per share NAV to assist broker-dealers that participated in the Company’s public offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations under National Association of Securities Dealers Rule 2340.
As with any valuation methodology, the methodology used by our board of directors in reaching an estimate of the per share NAV of our shares is based upon a number of estimates, assumptions, judgments and opinions that may, or may not, prove to be correct. The use of different estimates, assumptions, judgments or opinions may have resulted in significantly different estimates of the per share NAV of our shares. In addition, our board of directors’ estimate of per share NAV is not based on the book values of the Company’s real estate, as determined by generally accepted accounting principles, as the Company’s book value for most real estate is based on the amortized cost of the property, subject to certain adjustments. Furthermore, in reaching an estimate of the per share NAV of the Company’s shares, our board of directors did not include, among other things, a discount for debt that may include a prepayment obligation or a provision precluding assumption of the debt by a third party. As a result, there can be no assurance that:
stockholders will be able to realize the estimated per share NAV upon attempting to sell their shares; or
the Company will be able to achieve, for its stockholders, the estimated per share NAV upon a listing of the Company’s shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, a merger of the Company, or a sale of the Company’s portfolio.
When determining the estimated per share NAV, there are currently no SEC, federal or state rules that establish requirements specifying the methodology to employ in determining an estimated per share NAV. However, pursuant to FINRA rules, the determination of the estimated per share NAV must be conducted by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert and must be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice.
The estimated per share NAV is an estimate as of a given point in time and likely does not represent the amount of net proceeds that would result from an immediate sale of our assets. The estimated per share NAV of the Company’s shares will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, developments related to individual assets and changes in the real estate and capital markets.

20

Table of Contents


We may be unable to pay or maintain cash distributions or increase distributions over time.
There are many factors that can affect the availabilityWe operate in a highly competitive market for lending and timing of cash distributions to our stockholders. Distributions are based primarily on cash flow from operations. The amount of cash available for distributions is affected by many factors, such as the performance of our advisor in selecting acquisitions for us to make, selecting tenants for our properties and securing financing arrangements,investment opportunities, which may limit our ability to buy properties, the amount of rental income from our properties,originate or acquire desirable loans and our operating expense levels, as well as many other variables. We may not always be in a position to pay distributions to our stockholders and any distributions we do make may not increase over time. In addition, our actual results may differ significantly from the assumptions used by our board of directors in establishing the distribution rate to our stockholders. There also is a risk that we may not have sufficient cash flow from operations to fund distributions required to maintain our REIT status.
We have paid, and may continue to pay, some of our distributions from sources other than cash flows from operations, including borrowings and proceeds from asset sales, which may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately deployinvestments in our real estate operations and may negatively impact the value of our common stock.target assets.
To the extent that cash flow from operations has been or is insufficient to fully cover our distributions to our stockholders, we have paid, and may continue to pay, some of our distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations. Such sources may include borrowings, proceeds from asset sales or the sale of our securities. We have no limits on the amounts we may use to pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations. The payment of distributions from sources other than cash provided by operating activities mayreduce the amount of proceeds available for acquisitions and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds, and may cause subsequent holders of our common stock to experience dilution. This may negatively impact the value of our common stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2017 we paid distributions of $194.7 million, including $101.3 million through the issuance of shares pursuant to the DRIP Offerings. Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $198.9 million and reflected a reduction for real estate acquisition-related fees and expenses incurred of $1.6 million, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The distributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2017 were fully funded by net cash provided by operating activities.
Because we have in the past paid, and may in the future pay, distributions from sources other than our cash flows from operations, distributions at any point in time may not reflect the current performance of our properties or our current operating cash flow.
We may make distributions from any source, including the sources described in the risk factor above. Because the amount we pay in distributions may exceed our earnings and our cash flow from operations, distributions may not reflect the current performance of our properties or our current operating cash flow. To the extent distributions exceed cash flow from operations, distributions may be treated as a return of our stockholders’ investment and could reduce their basis in our common stock. A reduction in a stockholder’s basis in our common stock could result in the stockholder recognizing more gain upon the disposition of his or her shares, which, in turn, could result in greater taxable income to such stockholder.
We have experienced losses in the past, and we may experience additional losses in the future.

We have experienced net losses in the past (calculated in accordance with GAAP) and we may not be profitable or realize growth in the value of our assets. Many of our losses can be attributed to start-up costs, depreciation and amortization, as well as acquisition expenses incurred in connection with purchasing properties or making other investments. Our ability to sustain profitability is uncertain and depends on the demand for, and value of, our portfolio of properties. For a further discussion of our operational history and the factors affecting our losses, see Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
We may suffer from delays in locating suitable acquisitions, which could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and the value of their investment.
We could suffer from delays in locating suitable acquisitions. Delays we encounter in the selection and/or acquisition of income-producing properties could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and/or the value of their overall returns. Competition from other real estate investors increases the risk of delays in investing our net offering proceeds. If our advisor is unable to identify suitable acquisitions, we will hold the proceeds we raise or raised in the Offerings in an interest-bearing account or invest the proceeds in short-term, investment-grade investments, which would provide a significantly lower return to us than the return we expect from our real estate assets.

21

Table of Contents


Following the expiration of the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, CCO Group, LLC may be unable to make, on a timely or cost-effective basis, the changes necessary to replace the services provided by VEREIT OP pursuant to the Services Agreement and otherwise operate our programs.
Pursuant to the Services Agreement, VEREIT OP will continue to provide certain services to CCO Group and to the Cole REITs, including operational real estate support, during the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement. During that period, CCO Group, LLC intends to evaluate and effectuate an appropriate transition of these services to other CIM affiliates or third parties with the goal of ensuring continuity and minimizing disruption. We cannot assure our stockholders that CCO Group, LLC will be able to successfully identify or transition to itself or third parties, on a timely and cost-effective basis, the services provided by VEREIT OP pursuant to the Services Agreement and continue to effectively provide us services, and we cannot assure our stockholders that there will be no disruption in quality or quantity of services provided. Furthermore, any transition of such services to CCO Group, LLC or third parties could lead to increased expenses associated with such services. These increased expenses could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or results of operations.
CIM, the new parent company of CCO Group, has limited experience in the business of operating or managing entities that engage in double- and triple-net lease activities, which is an important aspect of CCO Group’s operations.
CIM, the new parent company of CCO Group, has limited experience in the business of operating or managing entities that principally engage in double- or triple-net lease activities. While CIM’s management has considerable general real estate operational and management experience, and some members of CIM’s management have knowledge and abilities relating to double- or triple-net lease activities, sponsoring entities that principally engage in double- and triple-net lease activities is a new business for CIM with risks that differ from those to which CIM has been subject historically. There can be no assurance that CIM’s management will have the skills needed to operate CCO Group profitably, especially following the expiration of the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement.
It may be difficult to accurately reflect material events that may impact the estimated per share NAV between valuations and, accordingly, we may be selling shares in our DRIP and repurchasing shares at too high or too low a price.
Our independent valuation firm calculated estimates of the market value of our principal real estate andCommercial real estate-related assets, and our board of directors determined the net value of our real estate and real estate-related assets and liabilities taking into consideration such estimate provided by the independent valuation firm. Our board of directors is ultimately responsible for determining the estimated per share NAV. Since our board of directors will determine our estimated per share NAV at least annually, there may be changes in the value of our propertiesinvestments that are not fully reflected in the most recent estimated per share NAV. As a result, the published estimated per share NAV may not fully reflect changes in value that may have occurred since the prior valuation.
Furthermore, our advisor will monitor our portfolio, but it may be difficultsecured, directly or indirectly, by real property are subject to reflect changing market conditions or material events that may impact the value of our portfolio between valuations, or to obtain timely or complete information regarding any such events. Therefore, the estimated per share NAV published before the announcement of an extraordinary event may differ significantly from our actual per share NAV until such time as sufficient information is availabledelinquency, foreclosure and analyzed, the financial impact is fully evaluated, and the appropriate adjustment is made to our estimated per share NAV, as determined by our board of directors. Any resulting disparity may be to the detriment of a purchaser of our shares or a stockholder selling shares pursuant to our share redemption program.
Our future success depends to a significant degree upon certain key personnel of our advisor. If our advisor loses or is unable to attract and retain key personnel, our ability to achieve our investment objectives could be delayed or hindered, which could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and the value of their investment.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of certain executive officers and other key personnel of CCO Group and our advisor. We cannot guarantee that all of these key personnel, or any particular person, will remain affiliated with us, CCO Group and/or our advisor. If any of our key personnel were to cease their affiliation with our advisor, our operating results could suffer. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our advisor’s ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure our stockholders that CCO Group or our advisor will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If our advisor loses or is unable to obtain the services of key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of our stockholders’ investment may decline.
If we seek to internalize our management functions in connection with a listing of our shares of common stock on an exchange or other liquidity event, and such internalization is approved by our stockholders, our stockholders’ interest in us could be diluted, and we could incur other significant costs associated with being self-managed.

22

Table of Contents


In the future, we may undertake a listing of our common stock on an exchange or other liquidity event that may involve internalizing our management functions. If our board of directors determines that it is in our best interest to internalize our management functions, and such internalization is approved by our stockholders, we may negotiate to acquire our advisor’s assets and personnel. At this time, we cannot be sure of the form or amount of consideration or other terms relating to any such acquisition. Such consideration could take many forms, including cash payments, promissory notes and shares of our common stock. The payment of such consideration could result in dilution of our stockholders’ interests as a stockholder and could reduce the net income per share attributable to their investment.
Internalization transactions involving the acquisition of advisors affiliated with entity sponsors have also, in some cases, been the subject of litigation. Even if these claims are without merit, we could be forced to spend significant amounts of money defending claims, which would reduce the amount of funds available to operate our business and to pay distributions.
In addition, while we would no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expenses we expect to pay to our advisor under the advisory agreement, our direct expenses would include general and administrative costs, including legal, accounting, and other expenses related to corporate governance, including SEC reporting and compliance. We would also incur the compensation and benefits costs of our officers and other employees and consultants that we now expect will be paid by our advisor or its affiliates. If the expenses we assume as a result of an internalization are higher than the expenses we avoid paying to our advisor, our net income per share would be lower as a result of the internalization than it otherwise would have been, potentially decreasing the amount of funds available to distribute to our stockholders and the value of our shares.
If we internalize our management functions, we could have difficulty integrating these functions as a stand-alone entity and we may fail to properly identify the appropriate mix of personnel and capital needed to operate as a stand-alone entity. Additionally, upon any internalization of our advisor, certain key personnel may not remain with our advisor, but will instead remain employees of CCO Group.
Our participation in a co-ownership arrangement could subject us to risks that otherwise may not be present in other real estate assets,loss, which could result in litigation or other potential liabilities that could increase our costs and negatively affect our results of operations.
We may enter in co-ownership arrangements with respectlosses to a portion of the properties we acquire. Co-ownership arrangements involve risks generally not otherwise present with an acquisition of real estate and could result in litigation or other potential liabilities, such as the following:us.
the risk that a co-owner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals that are or become inconsistent with our business interests or goals;
the risk that a co-owner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or our policies or objectives or status as a REIT;
the possibility that an individual co-owner might become insolvent or bankrupt, or otherwise default under any mortgage loan financing documents applicable to the property, which may constitute an event of default under all of the applicable mortgage loan financing documents, result in a foreclosure and the loss of all or a substantial portion of the investment made by the co-owner, or allow the bankruptcy court to reject the agreements entered into by the co-owners owning interests in the property;
the possibility that a co-owner might not have adequate liquid assets to make cash advances that may be required in order to fund operations, maintenance and other expenses related to the property, which could result in the loss of current or prospective tenants and otherwise adversely affect the operation and maintenance of the property, could cause a default under any mortgage loan financing documents applicable to the property and result in late charges, penalties and interest, and could lead to the exercise of foreclosure and other remedies by the lender;
the risk that a co-owner could breach agreements related to the property, which may cause a default under, and possibly result in personal liability in connection with, any mortgage loan financing documents applicable to the property, violate applicable securities laws, result in a foreclosure or otherwise adversely affect the property and the co-ownership arrangement;
the risk that we could have limited control and rights, with management decisions made entirely by a third party; and
the possibility that we will not have the right to sell the property at a time that otherwise could result in the property being sold for its maximum value.
In the event that our interests become adverse to those of the other co-owners, we may not have the contractual right to purchase the co-ownership interests from the other co-owners. Even if we are given the opportunity to purchase such co-ownership interests in the future, we cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient funds available at the time to purchase co-ownership interests from the co-owners.

23

Table of Contents


We might want to sell our co-ownership interests in a given property at a time when the other co-owners in such property do not desire to sell their interests. Therefore, because we anticipate that it will be much more difficult to find a willing buyer for our co-ownership interests in a property than it would be to find a buyer for a property we owned outright, we may not be able to sell our co-ownership interest in a property at the time we would like to sell.
Uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could materially adversely affect our financial condition and cash flows, and there can be no assurance as to future costs and the scope of coverage that may be available under insurance policies.
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in our portfolio under one or more blanket insurance policies with policy specifications, limits and deductibles customarily carried for similar properties. In addition, we carry professional liability and directors’ and officers’ insurance, and cyber liability insurance. While we select policy specifications and insured limits that we believe are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, any insurance coverages provided by tenants, the cost of the coverage and industry practice, there can be no assurance that we will not experience a loss that is uninsured or exceeds policy limits. In addition, we may reduce or discontinue terrorism, earthquake, flood or other insurance on some or all of our properties in the future if the cost of premiums for any of these policies exceeds, in our judgment, the value of the coverage discounted for the risk of loss. Our title insurance policies may not insure for the current aggregate market value of our portfolio, and we do not intend to increase our title insurance coverage as the market value of our portfolio increases.
Further, we do not carry insurance for certain losses, including, but not limited to, losses caused by riots or war. Certain types of losses may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes, riots or acts of war. If we experience a loss that is uninsured or which exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged. In addition, we carry several different lines of insurance, placed with several large insurance carriers. If any one of these large insurance carriers were to become insolvent, we would be forced to replace the existing insurance coverage with another suitable carrier, and any outstanding claims would be at risk for collection. In such an event, we cannot be certain that we would be able to replace the coverage at similar or otherwise favorable terms. As a result of any of the situations described above, our financial condition and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our tenant and stockholder relationships. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those we have outsourced.We have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls to help mitigate cyber incidents, but these measures do not guarantee that a cyber incident will not occur or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. A cyber incident could materially adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on common stock.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with our advisor and its affiliates, including the material conflicts discussed below. The “Conflicts of Interest” section of Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K provides a more detailed discussion of the conflicts of interest between us and our advisor and its affiliates, and our policies to reduce or eliminate certain potential conflicts.
Our advisormanager and its affiliates face conflicts of interest caused by their compensation arrangements with us, including significant compensation that may be required to be paid to our advisormanager if our advisormanager is terminated, which could result in actions that are not in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.terminated.
Our advisor and its affiliates are entitled to substantial fees from us under the terms of the advisory agreement. These fees could influence the judgment of our advisor and its affiliates in performing services for us. Among other matters, these compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

24

Table of Contents


the continuation, renewal or enforcement of our agreements with our advisor and its affiliates, including the advisory agreement;
property acquisitions from other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, which might entitle affiliates of our advisor to real estate commissions and possible success-based sale fees in connection with its services for the seller;
property acquisitions from third parties, which entitle our advisor to acquisition fees and advisory fees;
property or asset dispositions, which may entitle our advisor or its affiliates to disposition fees;
borrowings to acquire properties, which borrowings will increase the acquisition and advisory fees payable to our advisor; and
how and when to recommend to our board of directors a proposed strategy to provide our stockholders with liquidity, which proposed strategy, if implemented, could entitle our advisor to the payment of significant fees.
The acquisition fee payable to our advisor is principally based on the cost of our acquisitions and not on performance, which could result in our advisor taking actions that are not necessarily in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.
The acquisition fee we pay to our advisor is based on the cost of our acquisitions. As a result, our advisor receives this fee regardless of the quality of such acquisitions, the performance of such acquisitions or the quality of our advisor’s services rendered to us in connection with such acquisitions. This creates a potential conflict of interest between us and our advisor, as the interests of our advisor in receiving the acquisition fee may not be aligned with our interest of acquiring real estate that is likely to produce the maximum risk adjusted returns.
Our advisor faces conflicts of interest relating to the incentive fee structure under our advisory agreement, which could result in actions that are not necessarily in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.
Pursuant to the terms of our advisory agreement, our advisor is entitled to a subordinated performance fee that is structured in a manner intended to provide incentives to our advisor to perform in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders. However, because our advisor does not maintain a significant equity interest in us and is entitled to receive certain fees regardless of performance, our advisor’s interests are not wholly aligned with those of our stockholders. Furthermore, our advisor could be motivated to recommend riskier or more speculative acquisitions in order for us to generate the specified levels of performance or sales proceeds that would entitle our advisor to performance-based fees. In addition, our advisor will have substantial influence with respect to how and when our board of directors elects to provide liquidity to our stockholders, and these performance-based fees could influence our advisor’s recommendations to us in this regard. Our advisor also has the right to terminate the advisory agreement upon 60 days’ written notice without cause or penalty which, under certain circumstances, could result in our advisor earning a performance fee. This could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control.
Other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, as well as VEREIT, CIM and certain of its affiliates, use investment strategies that are similar to ours; therefore, our executive officers and the officers and key personnel of our advisor and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase and leasing of properties, and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor.
CCPT V, CCIT II, CCIT III, Cole Income NAV Strategy, CIM and its affiliates and VEREIT have characteristics, including targeted investment types, and investment objectives and criteria substantially similar to ours. As a result, we may be seeking to acquire properties and real estate-related assets at the same time as CIM or its affiliates, VEREIT or one or more of the other real estate programs sponsored oroperated by CCO Group and managed by officers and key personnel of our advisor and/or its affiliates, and these other programs may use investment strategies and have investment objectives and criteria substantially similar to ours. Certain of our executive officers and the executive officers of our advisor also are executive officers of CIM or its affiliates and other programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, the general partners of other private investment programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group and/or the advisors or fiduciaries of other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group. During the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, all transactions with a purchase price at or below $100 million will be allocated among VEREIT, us and the other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group by the Allocation Committee, which is comprised of employees of VEREIT and employees of CIM, CCO Group and their respective affiliates, in a manner consistent with the policy described in Part I, Item 1. Business — Conflicts of Interest in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There is a risk that the allocation of acquisition opportunities may result in our acquiring a property that provides lower returns to us than a property purchased by VEREIT or another real estate program sponsored by CCO Group.
In addition, we have acquired, and may continue to acquire, properties in geographic areas where CIM or its affiliates, VEREIT or other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group own properties. If one of these other real estate programs attracts a tenant that we are competing for, we could suffer a loss of revenue due to delays in locating another suitable tenant.

25

Table of Contents


Similar conflicts of interest may arise if our advisor recommends that we make or purchase mortgage loans or participations in mortgage loans, since CIM or its affiliates or other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group may be competing with us for these investments.
Our officers, certain of our directors and our advisor,manager, including its key personnel and officers, face conflicts of interest related to the positions they hold with affiliated and unaffiliated entities, which could hinder our ability to successfully implement our business strategy and to generate returns to our stockholders.entities.
Richard S. Ressler, our chief executive officer, president and one of our directors, is also a founder and principal of CIM and certain of its affiliates, as well as a director of CCIT III and Cole Income NAV Strategy. Furthermore, W. Brian Kretzmer, one of our directors, also serves as a director of CCIT III and Cole Income NAV Strategy. In addition, our chief financial officer and treasurer, Nathan D. DeBacker, is also an officer of other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group. Also, our advisor and its key personnel are or may be key personnel of other current or future real estate programs that have investment objectives, targeted assets, and legal and financial obligations substantially similar to ours, and/or key personnel of the advisor to such programs, and they may have other business interests as well. As a result, Messrs. Ressler, Kretzmer and DeBacker may owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their stockholders or equity owners, as applicable, which may from time to time conflict with the duties that they owe to us and our stockholders.
Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to (1) allocation of new acquisition opportunities, management time and operational expertise among us and the other entities, (2) our purchase of properties from, or sale of properties to, affiliated entities, (3) the timing and terms of the acquisition or sale of an asset, (4) development of our properties by affiliates, (5) investments with affiliates of our advisor, (6) compensation to our advisor and its affiliates, and (7) our relationship with, and compensation to, our dealer manager. Even if these persons do not violate their duties to us and our stockholders, they will have competing demands on their time and resources and may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and resources among us and these other entities and persons. Should such persons devote insufficient time or resources to our business, returns on our investments may suffer.
Our charter permits us to acquire assets and borrow funds from affiliates of our advisor, and sell or lease our assets to affiliates of our advisor, and any such transaction could result in conflicts of interest.
Under our charter, we are permitted to acquire properties from affiliates of our advisor, provided that any and all acquisitions from affiliates of our advisor must be approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in such transaction as being fair and reasonable to us and at a price to us that is no greater than the cost of the property to the affiliate of our advisor, unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in such transaction determines that there is substantial justification for any amount that exceeds such cost and that the difference is reasonable. In no event will we acquire a property from an affiliate of our advisor if the cost to us would exceed the property’s current appraised value as determined by an independent appraiser. In the event that we acquire a property from an affiliate of our advisor, we may be foregoing an opportunity to acquire a different property that might be more advantageous to us. In addition, under our charter, we are permitted to borrow funds from affiliates of our advisor, including our sponsor, provided that any such loans from affiliates of our advisor must be approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in such transaction as fair, competitive and commercially reasonable, and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties. Under our charter, we are also permitted to sell and lease our assets to affiliates of our advisor, and we have not established a policy that specifically addresses how we will determine the sale or lease price in any such transaction. Any such sale or lease transaction must be approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in such transaction as being fair and reasonable to us. To the extent that we acquire any properties from affiliates of our advisor, borrow funds from affiliates of our advisor or sell or lease our assets to affiliates of our advisor, such transactions could result in a conflict of interest.
Our advisor faces conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures or other co-ownership arrangements that we may enter into with CIM or its affiliates, VEREIT or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CCO Group, which could result in a disproportionate benefit to CIM or its affiliates, VEREIT or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CCO Group.
We may enter into joint ventures or co-ownership arrangements (including co-investment transactions) with CIM or its affiliates, VEREIT or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CCO Group for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties, as well as the acquisition of real estate-related assets. Since one or more of the officers of our advisor are officers of CIM or its affiliates, including CCO Group and/or the advisors to other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, our advisor may face conflicts of interest in determining which real estate program should enter into any particular joint venture or co-ownership arrangement. These persons also may have a conflict in structuring the terms of the

26

Table of Contents


relationship between us and any affiliated co-venturer or co-owner, as well as conflicts of interests in managing the joint venture, which may result in the co-venturer or co-owner receiving benefits greater than the benefits that we receive.
In the event we enter into joint venture or other co-ownership arrangements with CIM or its affiliates, VEREIT or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CCO Group, our advisor and its affiliates may have a conflict of interest when determining when and whether to buy or sell a particular property, or to make or dispose of another real estate-related asset. In addition, if we become listed for trading on a national securities exchange, we may develop more divergent goals and objectives from any affiliated co-venturer or co-owner that is not listed for trading. In the event we enter into a joint venture or other co-ownership arrangement with another real estate program sponsored or operated by CIM, CCO Group or their respective affiliates, or VEREIT, that has a term shorter than ours, the joint venture may be required to sell its properties earlier than we may desire to sell the properties. Even if the terms of any joint venture or other co-ownership agreement between us and CIM or its affiliates, VEREIT or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CCO Group grants us the right of first refusal to buy such properties, we may not have sufficient funds or borrowing capacity to exercise our right of first refusal under these circumstances. We have adopted certain procedures for dealing with potential conflicts of interest as further described in Part I, Item 1. Business — Conflicts of Interest in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results.
An effective system of internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports, prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. As part of our ongoing monitoring of internal controls, we may discover material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal controls that we believe require remediation. If we discover such weaknesses, we will make efforts to improve our internal controls in a timely manner. Any system of internal controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure to maintain effective internal controls, or implement any necessary improvements in a timely manner, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock, or cause us to not meet our reporting obligations. Ineffective internal controls could also cause holders of our securities to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which would likely have a negative effect on business.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of common stockholders or discourage a third party from acquiring us in a manner that might result in a premium price to our stockholders.
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of stock, of which 490,000,000 shares are classified as common stock and 10,000,000 shares are classified as preferred stock. In addition, our board of directors, without any action by our stockholders, may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we have authority to issue. Our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock into other classes or series of stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of any such stock. Shares of our common stock shall be subject to the express terms of any series of our preferred stock. Thus, if also approved by a majority of our independent directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of preferred stock with terms and conditions that have a priority as to distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation over the rights of the holders of our common stock. Preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing the removal of incumbent management or a change of control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium to the purchase price of our common stock for our stockholders.
Maryland law prohibits certain business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us to be acquired and may limit our stockholders’ ability to dispose of their shares.
Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock; or

27

Table of Contents


an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation.
A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which the person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by our board of directors.
After the five-year prohibition, any such business combination between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder.
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. The business combination statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Pursuant to the statute, our board of directors has exempted any business combination involving our advisor or any affiliate of our advisor. As a result, our advisor and any affiliate of our advisor may be able to enter into business combinations with us that may not be in the best interest of our stockholders, without compliance with the super-majority vote requirements and the other provisions of the statute. The business combination statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Maryland law also limits the ability of a third party to buy a large percentage of our outstanding shares and exercise voting control in electing directors.
Under its Control Share Acquisition Act, Maryland law also provides that a holder of “control shares” of a Maryland corporation acquired in a “control share acquisition” has no voting rights with respect to such shares except to the extent approved by the corporation’s disinterested stockholders by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares of stock owned by interested stockholders, that is, by the acquirer, or officers of the corporation or employees of the corporation who are directors of the corporation, are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. “Control shares” are voting shares of stock that would entitle the acquirer, except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy, to exercise voting control in electing directors within specified ranges of voting control. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of control shares. The control share acquisition statute does not apply (a) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Acquisition Act any acquisition of shares of our stock by CCO Group, LLC or any affiliate of CCO Group, LLC. This provision may be amended or eliminated at any time in the future. If this provision were amended or eliminated, this statute could have the effect of discouraging offers from third parties to acquire us and increasing the difficulty of successfully completing this type of offer by anyone other than our advisor or any of its affiliates.
Our charter includes a provision that may discourage a stockholder from launching a tender offer for our shares.
Our charter requires that any tender offer, including any “mini-tender” offer, must comply with most of the requirements of Regulation 14D of the Exchange Act. The offering person must provide us notice of the tender offer at least ten business days before initiating the tender offer. If the offering person does not comply with these requirements, our stockholders will be prohibited from transferring any shares to such non-complying person unless they first offered such shares to us at the tender offer price offered by the non-complying person. In addition, the non-complying person shall be responsible for all of our expenses in connection with that person’s noncompliance. This provision of our charter may discourage a person from initiating a tender offer for our shares and prevent our stockholders from receiving a premium to the purchase price for their shares in such a transaction.

28

Table of Contents


If we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we could not continue our current business plan, which may significantly reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We intend to conduct our operations, and the operations of our operating partnership and any other subsidiaries, so that no such entity meets the definition of an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. Under the Investment Company Act, in relevant part, a company is an “investment company” if:
pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(A), it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or
pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(C), it is engaged, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis (the 40% test). “Investment securities” exclude U.S. government securities and securities of majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.
We intend to monitor our operations and our assets on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, meet the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. If we were obligated to register as an investment company, we would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act imposing, among other things:
limitations on capital structure;
restrictions on specified investments;
prohibitions on transactions with affiliates;
compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations that would significantly change our operations; and
potentially, compliance with daily valuation requirements.
In order for us to not meet the definition of an “investment company” and avoid regulation under the Investment Company Act, we must engage primarily in the business of buying real estate, and these investments must be made within one year after the end of the Offering. To avoid meeting the definition of an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. Similarly, we may have to acquire additional income or loss generating assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forgo opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy. Accordingly, our board of directors may not be able to change our investment policies as they may deem appropriate if such change would cause us to meet the definition of an “investment company.” In addition, a change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect our ability to avoid being required to register as an investment company. If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court were to require enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.
Our board of directors may change certain of our policies without stockholder approval, which could alter the nature of our stockholders’ investment. If our stockholders do not agree with the decisions of our board of directors, they only have limited control over changes in our policies and operations and may not be able to change such policies and operations.
Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding investments, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of our stockholders. As a result, the nature of our stockholders’ investment could change without their consent. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter, our stockholders generally have a right to vote only on the following:
the election or removal of directors;
an amendment of our charter, except that our board of directors may amend our charter without stockholder approval to increase or decrease the aggregate number of our shares or the number of our shares of any class or series that we have the authority to issue, to change our name, to change the name or other designation or the par value of any class or series of our stock and the aggregate par value of our stock or to effect certain reverse stock splits; provided, however, that any such amendment does not adversely affect the rights, preferences and privileges of the stockholders;
our dissolution; and

29

Table of Contents


a merger or consolidation, a statutory share exchange or the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets.
In addition, pursuant to our charter, we will submit any other proposed liquidity event or transaction to our stockholders for approval if the transaction involves (a) the internalization of our management functions through our acquisition of our advisor or an affiliate of our advisor or (b) the payment of consideration to our advisor or an affiliate of our advisor other than pursuant to the terms of the advisory or dealer manager agreements or where the advisor or its affiliate receives consideration in its capacity as a stockholder on the same terms as our other stockholders.
All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board of directors.
The power of the board of directors to revoke our REIT election without stockholder approval may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders.
Our organizational documents permit our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if the board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. In such a case, we would become subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax on our net taxable income and we would no longer be required to distribute most of our net taxable income to our stockholders, which could have adverse consequences on the total return to holders of our common stock.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover claims against our officers, directors and our advisor are limited, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery against them if they cause us to incur losses.
The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that a director has no liability in such capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the corporation’s best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Our charter, in the case of our directors and officers, and our charter and the advisory agreement, in the case of our advisor and its affiliates, require us, subject to certain exceptions, to indemnify and advance expenses to our directors, our officers, and our advisor and its affiliates. Our charter permits us to provide such indemnification and advance for expenses to our employees and agents. Additionally, our charter limits, subject to certain exceptions, the liability of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders for monetary damages. Although our charter does not allow us to indemnify our directors or our advisor and its affiliates for any liability or loss suffered by them or hold harmless our directors or our advisor and its affiliates for any loss or liability suffered by us to a greater extent than permitted under Maryland law or the NASAA REIT Guidelines, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors, officers, employees and agents, and our advisor and its affiliates, than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery against them. In addition, our advisor is not required to retain cash to pay potential liabilities and it may not have sufficient cash available to pay liabilities if they arise. If our advisor is held liable for a breach of its fiduciary duty to us, or a breach of its contractual obligations to us, we may not be able to collect the full amount of any claims we may have against our advisor. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors, officers, employees and agents or our advisor in some cases, which would decrease the cash otherwise available for distribution to our stockholders.
Our stockholders’ interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares.
Existing stockholders do not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us inThe limit on the future. Our charter authorizes 500,000,000 shares of stock, of which 490,000,000 shares are classified as common stock and 10,000,000 shares are classified as preferred stock. Subject to any limitations set forth under Maryland law, our board of directors may amend our charter from time to time to increase the number of authorized shares of stock, increase or decrease the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we have authority to issue, or classify or reclassify any unissued shares into other classes or series of stock without the necessity of obtaining stockholder approval. All of such shares may be issued in the discretion of our board of directors, except that the issuance of preferred stock must also be approved by a majority of our independent directors not otherwise interested in the transaction. Our stockholders likely will suffer dilution of their equity investment in us, in the event that we (1) sell additional shares in the future, including those issued pursuant to our Secondary DRIP Offering, (2) sell securities that are convertible into shares of our common stock, (3) issue shares of our common stock in a private offering of securities to institutional investors, (4) issue shares of our common stock to our advisor, its successors or assigns, in payment of an outstanding fee obligation as set forth under our advisory agreement or (5) issue shares of our common stock to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of our operating partnership. In addition, the partnership agreement of our operating partnership contains provisions that would allow, under certain circumstances, other entities, including other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, to merge into or cause the exchange or conversion of their interest in that entity for interests of our operating partnership. Because the limited partnership interests of our operating partnership may, in the discretion of our board of directors, be exchanged for shares of our

30

Table of Contents


common stock, any merger, exchange or conversion between our operating partnership and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial numberpercentage of shares of our common stock thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders.
Our UPREIT structurethat any person may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners in our operating partnership whose interestsown may not be aligned with those ofdiscourage a takeover or business combination that may benefit our stockholders.
Our directors and officers have duties to our corporation and our stockholders under Maryland law in connection with their management of the corporation. At the same time, we, as general partner, have fiduciary duties under Delaware law to our operating partnership and to the limited partners in connection with the management of our operating partnership. If we admit outside limited partners to our operating partnership, our duties as general partner of our operating partnership and its partners may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to the corporation and our stockholders. Under Delaware law, a general partner of a Delaware limited partnership owes its limited partners the duties of good faith and fair dealing. Other duties, including fiduciary duties, may be modified or eliminated in the partnership’s partnership agreement. The partnership agreement of our operating partnership provides that, for so long as we own a controlling interest in our operating partnership, any conflict that cannot be resolved in a manner not adverse to either our stockholders or the limited partners will be resolved in favor of our stockholders.
Additionally, the partnership agreement expressly limits our liability by providing that we and our officers, directors, agents and employees, will not be liable or accountable to our operating partnership for losses sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not derived if we or our officers, directors, agents or employees acted in good faith. In addition, our operating partnership is required to indemnify us and our officers, directors, employees, agents and designees to the extent permitted by applicable law from and against any and all claims arising from operations of our operating partnership, unless it is established that: (1) the act or omission was committed in bad faith, was fraudulent or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; (2) the indemnified party received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or (3) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the indemnified person had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.
The provisions of Delaware law that allow the fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been tested in a court of law, and we have not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict our fiduciary duties.
General Risks Related to Real Estate Assets
Adverse economic, regulatory and geographic conditions that have an impact on the real estate market in general may prevent us from being profitable or from realizing growth in the value of our real estate properties.properties, and could have a significant negative impact on us.
Our operating results will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership
13

Table of real estate, including:Contents
changes in international, national or local economic or geographic conditions;
changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area;
changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds that may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive;
the illiquidity of real estate investments generally;
changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws; and
periods of high interest rates and tight money supply.
These risks and other factors may prevent us from being profitable, or from maintaining or growing the value of our real estate properties.
We are primarily dependent on single-tenant leases for our revenue and, accordingly, if we are unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, or re-lease space as leases expire on favorable terms or at all, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We focus our investment activities on ownership of primarily freestanding, single-tenant commercial properties that are net leased to a single tenant. Therefore, the financial failure of, or other default by, a significant tenant or multiple tenants could cause a material reduction in our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, to the extent that we enter into a master lease with a particular tenant, the termination of such master lease could affect each property subject to the master lease, resulting in the loss of revenue from all such properties.

31

Table of Contents


We cannot assure our stockholders that our leases will be renewed or that we will be able to lease or re-lease the properties on favorable terms, or at all, or that lease terminations will not cause us to sell the properties at a loss. Any of our properties that become vacant could be difficult to re-lease or sell. We have and may continue to experience vacancies either by the default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. We typically must incur all of the costs of ownership for a property that is vacant. Upon or pending the expiration of leases at our properties, we may be required to make rent or other concessions to tenants, or accommodate requests for renovations, remodeling and other improvements, in order to retain and attract tenants. Certain of our properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a tenant (e.g., a restaurant) and major renovations and expenditures may be required in order for us to re-lease the space for other uses. If the vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues and increased costs, resulting in less cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders. If we are unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, or re-lease space as leases expire on favorable terms or at all, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We are subject to geographic and industry concentrations that make us more susceptible to adverse events with respect to certain geographic areas or industries.
As of December 31, 2017, we had derived approximately:
10% of our annualized rental income from tenants in California; and
15% and 10% of our 2017 annualized rental income from tenants in the discount store and pharmacy industries, respectively.
Any adverse change in the financial condition of a tenant with whom we may have a significant credit concentration now or in the future, or any downturn of the economy in any state or industry in which we may have a significant credit concentration now or in the future, could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.
Our net leases may require us to pay property-related expenses that are not the obligations of our tenants.
Under the terms of the majority of our net leases, in addition to satisfying their rent obligations, our tenants are responsible for the payment or reimbursement of property expenses such as real estate taxes, insurance and ordinary maintenance and repairs. However, under the provisions of certain existing leases and leases that we may enter into in the future with our tenants, we may be required to pay some or all of the expenses of the property, such as the costs of environmental liabilities, roof and structural repairs, real estate taxes, insurance, certain non-structural repairs and maintenance. If our properties incur significant expenses that must be paid by us under the terms of our leases, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected and the amount of cash available to meet expenses and to pay distributions to our stockholders may be reduced.
If a major tenant declares bankruptcy, we may be unable to collect balances due under relevant leases, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants may adversely affect the income produced by our properties. Under bankruptcy law, a tenant cannot be evicted solely because of its bankruptcy and has the option to assume or reject any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, any resulting claim we have for breach of the lease (excluding collateral securing the claim) will be treated as a general unsecured claim. Our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid and future rent will be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and it is unlikely that a bankrupt tenant that rejects its lease would pay in full amounts it owes us under the lease. Even if a lease is assumed and brought current, we still run the risk that a tenant could condition lease assumption on a restructuring of certain terms, including rent, that would have an adverse impact on us. Any shortfall resulting from the bankruptcy of one or more of our tenants could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
In addition, the financial failure of, or other default by, one or more of the tenants to whom we have exposure could have an adverse effect on the results of our operations. While we evaluate the creditworthiness of our tenants by reviewing available financial and other pertinent information, there can be no assurance that any tenant will be able to make timely rental payments or avoid defaulting under its lease. If any of our tenants’ businesses experience significant adverse changes, they may fail to make rental payments when due, close a number of stores, exercise early termination rights (to the extent such rights are available to the tenant) or declare bankruptcy. A default by a significant tenant or multiple tenants could cause a material reduction in our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, if a tenant defaults, we may incur substantial costs in protecting our asset.

32

Table of Contents


If a sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized in a tenant’s bankruptcy proceeding, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We may enter into sale-leaseback transactions, whereby we would purchase a property and then lease the same property back to the person from whom we purchased it. In the event of the bankruptcy of a tenant, a transaction structured as a sale-leaseback might be re-characterized as either a financing or a joint venture, either of which outcomes could adversely affect our financial condition, cash flow and the amount available for distributions to our stockholders.
If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a financing, we would not be considered the owner of the property, and as a result would have the status of a creditor in relation to the tenant. In that event, we would no longer have the right to sell or encumber our ownership interest in the property. Instead, we would have a claim against the tenant for the amounts owed under the lease, with the claim arguably secured by the property. The tenant/debtor might have the ability to propose a plan restructuring the term, interest rate and amortization schedule of its outstanding balance. If confirmed by the bankruptcy court, we could be bound by the new terms, and prevented from foreclosing our lien on the property. If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a joint venture, we and our tenant could be treated as co-venturers with regard to the property. As a result, we could be held liable, under some circumstances, for debts incurred by the tenant relating to the property.
We have assumed, and in the future may assume, liabilities in connection with our property acquisitions, including unknown liabilities.
In connection with the acquisitions of properties, we may assume existing liabilities, some of which may have been unknown or unquantifiable at the time of the transaction. Unknown liabilities might include liabilities for cleanup or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions, claims of tenantsPandemics or other persons dealing withhealth crises, such as the sellers prior to our acquisitionoutbreak of the properties, tax liabilities, and accrued but unpaid liabilities whether incurred in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. If the magnitude of such unknown liabilities is high, either singly or in the aggregate, it couldCOVID-19, may adversely affect our business and/or operations, our tenants’ financial condition results of operations, cash flow or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
Challenging economic conditions could adversely affect vacancy rates, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to make distributions and the value of an investment in our shares.
Challenging economic conditions, the availability and cost of credit, turmoil in the mortgage market, and declining real estate markets may contribute to increased vacancy rates in the commercial real estate sector. If we experience vacancy rates that are higher than historical vacancy rates, we may have to offer lower rental rates and greater tenant improvements or concessions than expected. Increased vacancies may have a greater impact on us, as compared to REITs with other investment strategies, as our investment approach relies on long-term leases in order to provide a relatively stable stream of income for our stockholders. As a result, increased vacancy rates could have the following negative effects on us:
the valuesprofitability of our commercial properties could decrease belowproperties.
Risks Related to the amount paid for such assets;Mergers
revenues from such properties could decrease due to low or no rental income during vacant periods, lower future rental rates and/or increase tenant improvement expenses or concessions;
ownership costs could increase;
revenues from such properties that secure loans could decrease, making it more difficult for us to meet our payment obligations; and/or
the resale value of such properties could decline.
All of these factors could impair our ability to make distributions and decrease the value of an investment in our shares.
We may be unable to secure fundsachieve any cost synergies anticipated to result from the Mergers.
The Mergers may be dilutive to net income for future leasing commissions, tenant improvements or capital needs, which could adversely impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
When tenants do not renew their leases or otherwise vacate their space, it is usual that, in order to attract replacement tenants, we will be required to expend substantial funds for leasing commissions, tenant improvements and tenant refurbishmentsThe market value ascribed to the vacated space. In addition, although we expect that our leases with tenants will require tenants to pay routine property maintenance costs, we could be responsible for any major structural repairs, such as repairsshares of common stock of the other parties to the foundation, exterior walls and rooftops. We will use substantially all of the net proceeds from the Offerings to buy real estate and real estate-related assets and to pay various fees and expenses. We intend to reserve only approximately 0.1% of the gross proceeds from the Offerings for future capital needs. Accordingly, if we need additional capital in the future to improve or maintain our properties or for any other reason, we will have to obtain funds from other sources, such as cash flow from operations, borrowings, property sales or future equity offerings. These sources of funding may not be available on attractive terms or at

33

Table of Contents


all. If we cannot procure additional funding for capital improvements, weMergers upon a liquidity event may be required to defer necessary improvements to a property, which may cause that property to suffer from a greater risk of obsolescence or a decline in value, or a greater risk of decreased operating cash flows as a result of fewer potential tenants being attracted to the property. If this happens, our assets may generatesignificantly lower cash flows or decline in value, or both.
We may be unable to successfully expand our operations into new markets.
Each of the risks described in the previous risk factors that are applicable to our ability to acquire and successfully integrate and operate properties in the markets in which our properties are located are also applicable to our ability to acquire and successfully integrate and operate properties in new markets. In addition to these risks, we may not possess the same level of familiarity with the dynamics and market conditions of certain new markets that we may enter, which could adversely affect our ability to expand into those markets. We may be unable to build a significant market share or achieve a desired return on our assets in new markets. If we are unsuccessful in expanding into new markets, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
Our properties may be subject to impairment charges.
We routinely evaluate our real estate assets for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as market conditions, tenant performance and lease structure. For example, the early termination of, or default under, a lease by a tenant may lead to an impairment charge. Since our investment focus is on properties net leased to a single tenant, the financial failure of, or other default by, a single tenant under its lease may result in a significant impairment loss. If we determine that an impairment has occurred, we would be required to make a downward adjustment to the net carrying value of the property, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the impairment charge is recorded. Management has recorded an impairment charge related to certain properties in the year ended December 31, 2017, and may record future impairments based on actual results and changes in circumstances. Negative developments in the real estate market may cause management to reevaluate the business and macro-economic assumptions used in its impairment analysis. Changes in management’s assumptions based on actual results may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. See Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our real estate impairment charge.
We may obtain only limited warranties when we purchase a property and typically have only limited recourse in the event our due diligence did not identify any issues that lower the value of our property.
The seller of a property often sells such property in its “as is” condition on a “where is” basis and “with all faults,” without any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use or purpose. In addition, purchase agreements may contain only limited warranties, representations and indemnifications that will only survive for a limited period after the closing. The purchase of properties with limited warranties increases the risk that we may lose some or all of our invested capital in the property.
We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so, including as a result of uncertain market conditions.
Real estate assets are, in general, relatively illiquid and may become even more illiquid during periods of economic downturn. As a result, we may not be able to sell our properties quickly or on favorable terms in response to changes in the economy or other conditions when it otherwise may be prudent to do so. In addition, certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including debt service obligations, real estate taxes, and operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings. Further, as a result of the 100% prohibited transactions tax applicable to REITs, we intend to hold our properties for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forgo or defer sales of properties that otherwise would be favorable. Therefore, we may be unable to adjust our portfolio promptly in response to economic, market or other conditions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
Some of our leases may not contain rental increases over time, or the rental increases may be less than the fair market rate at a future point in time. When that is the case, the valueestimated per share NAV of the leased property to a potential purchaser may not increase over time, which may restrict our ability to sell that property, or if we are able to sell that property, may result in a sale price less than the price that we paid to purchase the property or the price that could be obtained if the rental was at the then-current market rate.

34

Table of Contents


We expect to hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as we decide that a sale or other disposition is appropriate given our REIT status and investment business objectives. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms or at all depends on certain factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. We cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate assets which will exist at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions which may affect the disposition of our properties, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to sell such properties at a profit or at all in the future. Accordingly, the extent to which our stockholders will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate assets will depend upon fluctuating market conditions. Furthermore, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.
Our properties where the underlying tenant has a below investment grade credit rating, as determined by major credit rating agencies, or has an unrated tenant may have a greater risk of default.
As of December 31, 2017, approximately 66.1% of our tenants were not rated or did not have an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency or were not affiliates of companies having an investment grade credit rating. Our properties with such tenants may have a greater risk of default and bankruptcy than properties leased exclusively to investment grade tenants. When we acquire properties where the tenant does not have a publicly available credit rating, we will use certain credit assessment tools as well as rely on our own estimates of the tenant’s credit rating which includes reviewing the tenant’s financial information (e.g., financial ratios, net worth, revenue, cash flows, leverage and liquidity, if applicable). If our ratings estimates are inaccurate, the default or bankruptcy risk for the subject tenant may be greater than anticipated. If our lender or a credit rating agency disagrees with our ratings estimates, we may not be able to obtain our desired level of leverage or our financing costs may exceed those that we projected. This outcome could have an adverse impact on our returns on that asset and hence our operating results.
We are exposed to risks related to increases in market lease rates and inflation, as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flow from operations.
We are exposed to risks related to increases in market lease rates and inflation, as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flow from operations. Leases of long-term duration or which include renewal options that specify a maximum rate increase may result in below-market lease rates over time if we do not accurately estimate inflation or market lease rates. Provisions of our leases designed to mitigate the risk of inflation and unexpected increases in market lease rates, such as periodic rental increases, may not adequately protect us from the impact of inflation or unexpected increases in market lease rates. If we are subject to below-market lease rates on a significant number of our properties pursuant to long-term leases and our operating and other expenses are increasing faster than anticipated, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock could be materially adversely affected.
We may acquire or finance properties with lock-out provisions, which may prohibit us from selling a property or may require us to maintain specified debt levels for a period of years on some properties.
A lock-out provision is a provision that prohibits the prepayment of a loan during a specified period of time. Lock-out provisions may include terms that provide strong financial disincentives for borrowers to prepay their outstanding loan balance. If a property is subject to a lock-out provision, we may be materially restricted from or delayed in selling or otherwise disposing of or refinancing such property. Lock-out provisions may prohibit us from reducing the outstanding indebtedness with respect to any properties, refinancing such indebtedness at maturity, or increasing the amount of indebtedness with respect to such properties. Lock-out provisions could impair our ability to take other actions during the lock-out period that could be in the best interests of our stockholders and, therefore, may have an adverse impact on the value of our shares relative to the value that would result if the lock-out provisions did not exist. In particular, lock-out provisions could preclude us from participating in major transactions that could result in a disposition of our assets or a change of control even though that disposition or change of control might be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Increased operating expenses could reduce cash flow from operations and funds available to acquire investments or make distributions.
Our properties are subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us. If any property is not fully occupied or if rents are payable (or are being paid) in an amount that is insufficient to cover operating expenses that are the landlord’s responsibility under the lease, we could be required to expend funds in excess of such rents with respect to that property for operating expenses. Our properties are subject to increases in tax rates, utility costs, insurance costs, repairs and maintenance costs, administrative costs and other operating and ownership expenses. Some of our

35

Table of Contents


property leases may not require the tenants to pay all or a portion of these expenses, in which event we may be responsible for these costs. If we are unable to lease properties on terms that require the tenants to pay all or some of the properties’ operating expenses, if our tenants fail to pay these expenses as required or if expenses we are required to pay exceed our expectations, we could have less funds available for future acquisitions or cash available for distributions to our stockholders.
The market environment may adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Any deterioration of domestic or international financial markets could impact the availability of credit or contribute to rising costs of obtaining credit and therefore, could have the potential to adversely affect the value of our assets, the availability or the terms of financing, our ability to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance, any indebtedness and/or, for our leased properties, the ability of our tenants to enter into new leasing transactions or satisfy their obligations, including the payment of rent, under existing leases. The market environment also could affect our operating results and financial condition as follows:
Debt Markets - The debt market is sensitive to the macro environment, such as Federal Reserve policy, market sentiment, or regulatory factors affecting the banking and commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”) industries. Should overall borrowing costs increase, due to either increases in index rates or increases in lender spreads, our operations may generate lower returns.
Real Estate Markets - While incremental demand growth has helped to reduce vacancy rates and support modest rental growth in recent years, and while improving fundamentals have resulted in gains in property values, in many markets property values, occupancy and rental rates continue to be below those previously experienced before the most recent economic downturn. If recent improvements in the economy reverse course, the properties we acquire could substantially decrease in value after we purchase them. Consequently, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, which may require us to recognize an impairment charge or record a loss on sale in our earnings.
Real estate related taxes may increase, and if these increases are not passed on to tenants, our income will be reduced.
Local real property tax assessors may reassess our properties, which may result in increased taxes. Generally, property taxes increase as property values or assessment rates change, or for other reasons deemed relevant by property tax assessors. An increase in the assessed valuation of a property for real estate tax purposes will result in an increase in the related real estate taxes on that property. Although some tenant leases may permit us to pass through such tax increases to the tenants for payment, renewal leases or future leases may not be negotiated on the same basis. Tax increases not passed through to tenants could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
Covenants, conditions and restrictions may restrict our ability to operate a property.
Many of our properties are or will be subject to significant covenants, conditions and restrictions, known as “CC&Rs,” restricting their operation and any improvements on such properties. Compliance with CC&Rs may adversely affect the types of tenants we are able to attract to such properties, our operating costs and reduce the amount of funds that we have available to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Acquisitions of build-to-suit properties will be subject to additional risks related to properties under development.
We may engage in build-to-suit programs and the acquisition of properties under development. In connection with these acquisitions, we will enter into purchase and sale arrangements with sellers or developers of suitable properties under development or construction. In such cases, we are generally obligated to purchase the property at the completion of construction, provided that the construction conforms to definitive plans, specifications, and costs approved by us in advance. We may also engage in development and construction activities involving existing properties, including the expansion of existing facilities (typically at the request of a tenant) or the development or build-out of vacant space at retail properties. We may advance significant amounts in connection with certain development projects.
As a result, we are subject to potential development risks and construction delays and the resultant increased costs and risks, as well as the risk of loss of certain amounts that we have advanced should a development project not be completed. To the extent that we engage in development or construction projects, we may be subject to uncertainties associated with obtaining permits or re-zoning for development, environmental and land use concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups, and the builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs and timetables. If a developer or builder fails to perform, we may terminate the purchase, modify the construction contract or resort to legal action to compel performance (or in certain cases, we may elect to take over the project and pursue completion of the project ourselves). A

36

Table of Contents


developer’s or builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond that party’s control. Delays in obtaining permits or completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases.
We may incur additional risks if we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders before they complete construction. These and other such factors can result in increased project costs or the loss of our investment. Although we rarely engage in construction activities relating to space that is not already leased to one or more tenants, to the extent that we do so, we may be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also will rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of the property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If these projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property and our return on our investment could suffer. If we contract with a development company for a newly developed property, there is a risk that money advanced to that development company for the project may not be fully recoverable if the developer fails to successfully complete the project.
Our operating results may be negatively affected by potential development and construction delays and the resultant increased costs and risks.
If we engage in development or construction projects, we will be subject to uncertainties associated with re-zoning for development, environmental and land use concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups, and our builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs, and timetables. If a builder fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to rescind the breached agreements or to compel performance. A builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Delays in completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases. We may incur additional risks if we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders before they complete construction. These and other such factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our asset. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and our return on our assets could suffer.
We may deploy capital in unimproved real property. Returns from development of unimproved properties are also subject to risks associated with re-zoning the land for development and environmental and land use concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups.
If we purchase an option to acquire a property but do not exercise the option, we likely would forfeit the amount we paid for such option, which would reduce the amount of cash we have available to make other investments.
In determining whether to purchase a particular property, we may obtain an option to purchase such property. The amount paid for an option, if any, normally is forfeited if the property is not purchased and normally is credited against the purchase price if the property is purchased. If we purchase an option to acquire a property but do not exercise the option, we likely would forfeit the amount we paid for such option, which would reduce the amount of cash we have available to make other investments.
Competition with third parties in acquiring, leasing or selling properties and other investments may reduce our profitability and the return on our stockholders’ investment.
We compete with many other entities engaged in real estate investment activities, including individuals, corporations, bank and insurance company investment accounts, other REITs, real estate limited partnerships, and other entities engaged in real estate investment activities, many of which have greater resources than we do. Larger competitors may enjoy significant advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. In addition, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable acquisitions may increase. Any such increase would result in increased demand for these assets and therefore increased prices paid for them. If we pay higher prices for properties and other assets as a result of competition with third parties without a corresponding increase in tenant lease rates, our profitability will be reduced, and our stockholders may experience a lower return on their investment.
We are also subject to competition in the leasing of our properties. Many of our competitors own properties similar to ours in the same markets in which our properties are located. If one of our properties is nearing the end of the lease term or becomes vacant and our competitors (which could include funds sponsored by affiliates of our advisor) offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose existing or potential tenants and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge or to offer substantial rent concessions in order to retain tenants when such tenants’ leases expire or to attract new tenants.

37

Table of Contents


In addition, if our competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to sell in the same markets and/or at valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be unable to dispose of our assets at all or at favorable pricing or on favorable terms. As a result of these actionsconsidered by our competitors, our business, financial condition, liquidityBoard in approving and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our properties face competition that may affect tenants’ ability to pay rent andrecommending the amount of rent paid to us may affect the cash available for distributions to our stockholders and the amount of distributions.Mergers.
Many of our leases provide for increases in rent as a result of increases in the tenant’s sales volume. There likely will be numerous other retail properties within the market area of such properties that will compete with our tenants for customer business. In addition, traditional retailers face increasing competition from alternative retail channels, including internet-based retailers and other forms of e-commerce, factory outlet centers, wholesale clubs, mail order catalogs and television shopping networks, which could adversely impact our retail tenants’ sales volume. Such competition could negatively affect such tenants’ ability to pay rent or the amount of rent paid to us. This could result in decreased cash flow from tenants thus affecting cash available for distributions to our stockholders and the amount of distributions we pay.
Acquiring or attempting to acquire multiple properties in a single transaction may adversely affect our operations.
From time to time, we may acquire multiple properties in a single transaction. Portfolio acquisitions are often more complex and expensive than single-property acquisitions, and the risk that a multiple-property acquisition does not close may be greater than in a single-property acquisition. Portfolio acquisitions may also result in us owning assets in geographically dispersed markets, placing additional demands on our ability to manage the properties in the portfolio. In addition, a seller may require that a group of properties be purchased as a package even though we may not want to purchase one or more properties in the portfolio. In these situations, if we are unable to identify another person or entity to acquire the unwanted properties, we will be required to either pass on the entire portfolio, including the desirable properties or acquire the entire portfolio and operate or attempt to dispose of the unwanted properties. To acquire multiple properties in a single transaction, we may be required to accumulate a large amount of cash. We would expect the returns that we earn on such cash to be less than the ultimate returns on real property, therefore accumulating such cash could reduce our funds available for distributions to our stockholders. Any of the foregoing events may have an adverse impact on our operations.
Terrorism andwarcould harm our operating results.
The strength and profitability of our business depends on demand for and the value of our properties. Future terrorist attacks in the United States, such as the attacks that occurred in New York and the District of Columbia on September 11, 2001 and in Boston on April 15, 2013, and other acts of terrorism or war may have a negative impact on our operations. Terrorist attacks in the United States and elsewhere may result in declining economic activity, which could harm the demand for and the value of our properties. In addition, the public perception that certain locations are at greater risk for attack, such as major airports, ports, and rail facilities, may decrease the demand for and the value of our properties near these sites. A decrease in demand could make it difficult for us to renew or re-lease our properties at these sites at lease rates equal to or above historical rates. Such terrorist attacks could have an adverse impact on our business even if they are not directed at our properties.
In addition, the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 have substantially affected the availability and price of insurance coverage for certain types of damages or occurrences, and our insurance policies for terrorism include large deductibles and co-payments. Although we maintain terrorism insurance coverage on our portfolio, the amount of our terrorism insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover losses inflicted by terrorism and therefore could expose us to significant losses and have a negative impact on our operations.
Costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations may adversely affect our income and the cash available for any distributions.
All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials, and the remediation of any associated contamination. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on tenants, current or previous owners or operators for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. This liability could be substantial. In addition, such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which the property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures and/or adversely affect the value of the property. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private

38

Table of Contents


parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances. The presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to use such property as collateral for future borrowing.
Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require material expenditures by us. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, our properties may be affected by our tenants’ operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties. In addition, there are various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations that we may be required to comply with, and that may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. Any material expenditures, fines, or damages we must pay will reduce our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and may reduce the value of their investment.
Some of these properties may contain at the time of acquisition, or may have contained prior to our acquisition, underground storage tanks for the storage of petroleum products and other hazardous or toxic substances. Certain of our properties may be adjacent to or near other properties upon which others have engaged, or may engage in the future, in activities that may release petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances.
From time to time, we may acquire properties, or interests in properties, with known adverse environmental conditions where we believe that the environmental liabilities associated with these conditions are quantifiable and that the acquisition will yield a superior risk-adjusted return. In such an instance, we will estimate the costs of environmental investigation, clean-up and monitoring in determining the purchase price. Further, in connection with property dispositions, we may agree to remain responsible for, and to bear the cost of, remediating or monitoring certain environmental conditions on the properties.
We may not obtain an independent third-party environmental assessment for every property we acquire. In addition, any such assessment that we do obtain may not reveal all environmental liabilities. The cost of defending against claims of liability, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims would adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.
If we sell properties by providing financing to purchasers, defaults by the purchasers would adversely affect our cash flow from operations.
In some instances, we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default on its obligations under the financing, which could negatively impact cash flow from operations. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of sale proceeds or their reinvestment in other assets will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon the sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of. In some cases, we may receive initial down payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price, and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. If any purchaser defaults under a financing arrangement with us, it could negatively impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
Changes in U.S. accounting standards regarding operating leases may make the leasing of our properties less attractive to our potential tenants, which could reduce overall demand for our leasing services.
Under current authoritative accounting guidance for leases, a lease is classified by a tenant as a capital lease if the significant risks and rewards of ownership are considered to reside with the tenant. Under capital lease accounting for a tenant, both the leased asset and liability are reflected on its balance sheet. If the lease does not meet the criteria for a capital lease, the lease is to be considered an operating lease by the tenant, and the obligation does not appear on the tenant’s balance sheet; rather, the contractual future minimum payment obligations are only disclosed in the footnotes thereto. Thus, entering into an operating lease can appear to enhance a tenant’s balance sheet in comparison to direct ownership. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board conducted a joint project to re-evaluate lease accounting. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which will require that a tenant recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months, with the result being the recognition of a right of use asset and a lease liability and the disclosure of key information about the entity’s leasing arrangements. These and other potential changes to the accounting guidance could affect both our accounting for leases as well as that of our current and potential tenants. These changes may affect how our real estate leasing business is conducted. For example, with the ASU 2016-02 revision, companies may be less willing to enter into leases in general or desire to enter into leases with shorter terms because the apparent benefits to their balance sheets under current

39

Table of Contents


practice could be reduced or eliminated. This impact in turn could make it more difficult for us to enter into leases on terms we find favorable. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is still currently evaluating the full impact ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements; however the Company plans to adopt ASU 2016-02 as of January 1, 2019.
Changes in accounting standards may adversely impact our financial condition and/or results of operations.
We are subject to the rules and regulations of the FASB related to GAAP. Various changes to GAAP are constantly being considered, some of which could materially impact our reported financial condition and/or results of operations. Also, to the extent that public companies in the United States would be required in the future to prepare financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards instead of the current GAAP, this change in accounting standards could materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, and fire, safety and other regulations may require us to make unanticipated expenditures that could significantly reduce the cash available for distributions on our common stock.
Our properties are subject to regulation under federal laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (the “ADA”), pursuant to which all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Although we believe that our properties substantially comply with present requirements of the ADA, we have not conducted an audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine our compliance. If one or more of our properties or future properties are not in compliance with the ADA, we might be required to take remedial action, which would require us to incur additional costs to bring the property into compliance. Noncompliance with the ADA could also result in imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants.
Additional federal, state and local laws also may require modifications to our properties or restrict our ability to renovate our properties. We cannot predict the ultimate amount of the cost of compliance with the ADA or other legislation.
In addition, our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local earthquake, fire and life safety requirements. If we were to fail to comply with these various requirements, we might incur governmental fines or private damage awards. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA or any other regulatory requirements, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock could be materially adversely affected. Local regulations, including municipal or local ordinances, zoning restrictions and restrictive covenants imposed by community developers may restrict our use of our properties and may require us to obtain approval from local officials or community standards organizations at any time with respect to our properties, including prior to acquiring a property or when undertaking renovations of any of our existing properties.
Risks Associated with Debt Financing
We have incurred mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, hinder our ability to make distributions, and decrease the value of our stockholders’ investment.
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Risks Associated with Real-Estate Related Assets
Investing in mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans could adversely affect our return on our loan investments.
We are subject to risks relating to real-estate related securities, including CMBS.
U.S. Federal Income and Other Tax Risks
Failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes would adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions.
Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet annual distribution requirements, which may force us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities or borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions. This could delay or hinder our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce our stockholders’ overall returns.
Risks Related to Our Business
We currently have not identified all of the credit investments, properties or other real estate-related assets we intend to purchase. For this and other reasons, an investment in our shares is speculative.
We currently have not identified all of the credit investments, properties or other real estate-related assets that we may purchase. We have established policies relating to the types of assets we will acquire and the creditworthiness of tenants of our properties or other investment opportunities, but our manager has wide discretion in implementing these policies, subject to the oversight of our Board. Additionally, our manager has discretion to determine the location, number and size of our investments and the percentage of net proceeds we may dedicate to a single investment. As a result, you will not be able to evaluate the economic merit of our future investments until after such investments have been made. Therefore, an investment in our shares is speculative.
Our stockholders should consider our prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies that, like us, have not identified all credit investments, properties or real estate-related assets that they intend to purchase. To be successful in this market, we and our manager must, among other things:
identify and make investments that further our investment objectives;
rely on our manager and its affiliates to attract, integrate, motivate and retain qualified personnel to manage our day-to-day operations;
respond to competition for our targeted credit investments, real estate and other assets;
14

Table of Contents

rely on our manager and its affiliates to continue to build and expand our operations structure to support our business; and
be continuously aware of, and interpret, marketing trends and conditions.
We may not succeed in achieving these goals, and our failure to do so could cause our stockholders to lose all or a portion of their investment.
Our shares have limited liquidity and we are not required, through our charter or otherwise, to provide for a liquidity event. There is no public trading market for our shares and there may never be one; therefore, it will be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares. Our stockholders should view our shares only as a long-term investment.
There is no public market for our common stock and there may never be one. In addition, we do not have a fixed date or method for providing stockholders with liquidity. We expect that our Board will make that determination in the future based, in part, upon advice from our manager. If our stockholders are able to find a buyer for their shares, our stockholders will likely have to sell them at a substantial discount to their purchase price. It also is likely that our stockholders’ shares would not be accepted as the primary collateral for a loan. Therefore, shares of our common stock should be considered illiquid and a long-term investment, and our stockholders must be prepared to hold their shares of our common stock for an indefinite length of time.
Our stockholders will be limited in their ability to sell their shares pursuant to our share redemption program and may have to hold their shares for an indefinite period of time.
Our share redemption program allows our stockholders to sell shares of our common stock to us in limited circumstances, subject to numerous restrictions. Subject to funds being available, we will generally limit the number of shares redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program to no more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12 months prior to the end of the fiscal quarter for which the redemption is being paid. In addition, we intend to limit quarterly redemptions to approximately 1.25% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12-month period ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter, and funding for redemptions for each quarter generally will be limited to the net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares in the respective quarter under the DRIP. Any of the foregoing limits might prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any fiscal quarter or in any 12-month period. During the
17 quarters immediately preceding suspension of the share redemption program, quarterly redemptions were honored on a pro rata basis, as requests for redemption exceeded the quarterly redemption limits described above. The Board may amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate our share redemption program without stockholder approval at any time if it believes that such action is in the best interest of our stockholders, and our management may reject any request for redemption. These restrictions severely limit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares should they require liquidity, and limit our stockholders’ ability to recover the amount they invested or the fair market value of their shares.
Our estimated per share NAV is an estimate as of a given point in time and likely will not represent the amount of net proceeds that would result if we were liquidated or dissolved or completed a merger or other sale of the Company.
Based on the recommendation from the valuation, compensation and affiliate transactions committee of our Board, which is comprised solely of independent directors, our Board, including all of its independent directors, approves and establishes at least annually an updated estimated per share NAV of the Company’s common stock, which is based on an estimated market value of the Company’s assets less the estimated market value of the Company’s liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding. The Company provides this updated estimated per share NAV to assist broker-dealers that participated in the Company’s initial public offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations under FINRA Rule 2231.
As with any valuation methodology, the methodology used by our Board in reaching an estimate of the per share NAV of our shares is based upon a number of estimates, assumptions, judgments and opinions that may, or may not, prove to be correct. The use of different estimates, assumptions, judgments or opinions may have resulted in significantly different estimates of the per share NAV of our shares. In addition, our Board’s estimate of per share NAV is not based on the book values of the Company’s real estate, as determined by generally accepted accounting principles, as the Company’s book value for most real estate is based on the amortized cost of the property, subject to certain adjustments. Furthermore, in reaching an estimate of the per share NAV of the Company’s shares, our Board did not include, among other things, a discount for debt that may include a prepayment obligation or a provision precluding assumption of the debt by a third party.
15

Table of Contents

As a result, there can be no assurance that:
stockholders will be able to realize the estimated per share NAV upon attempting to sell their shares; or
the Company will be able to achieve, for its stockholders, the estimated per share NAV upon a listing of the Company’s shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, a merger of the Company, or a sale of the Company’s portfolio.
There are currently no SEC, federal or state rules that establish requirements specifying the methodology to employ in determining an estimated per share NAV. However, pursuant to rules of FINRA, the determination of the estimated per share NAV must be conducted by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert and must be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice.
The estimated per share NAV is an estimate as of a given point in time and likely does not represent the amount of net proceeds that would result from an immediate sale of our assets, or in the event that we are liquidated or dissolved or completed a merger or other sale of the Company. The estimated per share NAV of the Company’s shares will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, developments related to individual assets and changes in the real estate and capital markets.
The Board last established an updated estimated per share NAV of the Company's shares as of June 30, 2020 on August 14, 2020.
We may be unable to pay or maintain cash distributions or increase distributions over time.
There are many factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash distributions to our stockholders. Distributions are based primarily on cash flows from operations. The amount of cash available for distributions is affected by many factors, such as the performance of our manager in selecting investments for us to make, selecting tenants for our properties and securing financing arrangements, our ability to make investments, the amount of income we receive from our investments, and our operating expense levels, as well as many other variables. We may not always be in a position to pay distributions to our stockholders and any distributions we do make may not increase over time. In addition, our actual results may differ significantly from the assumptions used by our Board in establishing the distribution rate to our stockholders. There also is a risk that we may not have sufficient cash flows from operations to fund distributions required to maintain our REIT status.
We have paid, and may continue to pay, some of our distributions from sources other than cash flows from operations, including borrowings and proceeds from asset sales, which may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately deploy in our real estate operations and may negatively impact the value of our common stock. Additionally, distributions at any point in time may not reflect the current performance of our properties or our current operating cash flows.
To the extent that cash flows from operations have been or are insufficient to fully cover our distributions to our stockholders, we have paid, and may continue to pay, some of our distributions from sources other than cash flows from operations. Such sources may include borrowings, proceeds from asset sales or the sale of our securities. We have no limits on the amounts we may use to pay distributions from sources other than cash flows from operations. The payment of distributions from sources other than cash provided by operating activities mayreduce the amount of proceeds available for acquisitions and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds, and may cause subsequent holders of our common stock to experience dilution. This may negatively impact the value of our common stock.
Because the amount we pay in distributions may exceed our earnings and our cash flows from operations, distributions may not reflect the current performance of our properties or our current operating cash flows. To the extent distributions exceed cash flows from operations, distributions may be treated as a return of our stockholders’ investment and could reduce their basis in our common stock. A reduction in a stockholder’s basis in our common stock could result in the stockholder recognizing more gain upon the disposition of his or her shares, which, in turn, could result in greater taxable income to such stockholder. For more information regarding the sources of distributions for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, see Part II, Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The declaration, amount and payment of future cash distributions on our common stock are subject to uncertainty due to current market conditions.
All distributions will be declared at the discretion of our Board and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, REIT distribution requirements, and other factors as our Board may deem relevant from time to time. The economic impacts resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions. Our Board is under no obligation or requirement to declare future distributions and will continue to assess our common stock distribution rate on an ongoing basis, as market conditions and our financial position continue to evolve. We cannot assure you that we will achieve results that will allow us to pay distributions on our common stock or that the level of distributions will be maintained or increased.
16

Table of Contents

We have experienced losses in the past, and we may experience additional losses in the future.
We have experienced net losses in the past (calculated in accordance with GAAP, and we may not be profitable or realize growth in the value of our assets. Many of our losses can be attributed to start-up costs, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, as well as acquisition expenses incurred in connection with purchasing properties or making other investments. Our ability to sustain profitability is uncertain and depends on the demand for, and value of, our portfolio of properties. For a further discussion of our operational history and the factors affecting our losses, see Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
It may be difficult to accurately reflect material events that may impact the estimated per share NAV between valuations and, accordingly, we may issue shares in our DRIP or repurchase shares at too high or too low a price.
Our independent valuation firm calculated estimates of the market value of our principal real estate and real estate-related assets, and our Board determines the net value of our real estate and real estate-related assets and liabilities taking into consideration such estimate provided by the independent valuation firm. The Board is ultimately responsible for determining the estimated per share NAV. Since our Board will determine our estimated per share NAV at least annually, there may be changes in the value of our properties that are not fully reflected in the most recent estimated per share NAV. As a result, the published estimated per share NAV may not fully reflect changes in value that may have occurred since the prior valuation.
Furthermore, our manager will monitor our portfolio, but it may be difficult to reflect changing market conditions or material events that may impact the value of our portfolio between valuations, or to obtain timely or complete information regarding any such events. Therefore, the estimated per share NAV published before the announcement of an extraordinary event may differ significantly from our actual per share NAV until such time as sufficient information is available and analyzed, the financial impact is fully evaluated, and the appropriate adjustment is made to our estimated per share NAV, as determined by our Board. Any resulting disparity may be to the detriment of a purchaser of our shares or a stockholder selling shares pursuant to our share redemption program. The Board last established an updated estimated per share NAV of the Company's shares as of June 30, 2020 on August 14, 2020.
Our future success depends to a significant degree upon certain key personnel of our manager. If our manager loses or is unable to attract and retain key personnel, our ability to achieve our investment objectives could be delayed or hindered, which could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and the value of their investment.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of certain executive officers and other key personnel of CCO Group and our manager. We cannot guarantee that all of these key personnel, or any particular person, will remain affiliated with us, CCO Group and/or our manager. If any of our key personnel were to cease their affiliation with our manager, our operating results could suffer. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our manager’s ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure our stockholders that CCO Group or our manager will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If our manager loses or is unable to obtain the services of key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of our stockholders’ investment may decline.
If we seek to internalize our management functions in connection with a listing of our shares of common stock on an exchange or other liquidity event, our stockholders’ interest in us could be diluted, and we could incur other significant costs associated with being self-managed.
In the future, we may undertake a listing of our common stock on an exchange or other liquidity event that may involve internalizing our management functions. If our Board determines that it is in our best interest to internalize our management functions, we may negotiate to acquire our manager’s assets and personnel. At this time, we cannot be sure of the form or amount of consideration or other terms relating to any such acquisition. Such consideration could take many forms, including cash payments, promissory notes and shares of our common stock. The payment of such consideration could result in dilution of our stockholders’ interests as a stockholder and could reduce the net income per share attributable to their investment.
Internalization transactions involving the acquisition of advisors affiliated with entity sponsors have also, in some cases, been the subject of litigation. Even if these claims are without merit, we could be forced to spend significant amounts of money defending claims, which would reduce the amount of funds available to operate our business and to pay distributions.
In addition, while we would no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expenses we expect to pay to our manager under the Management Agreement, our direct expenses would include general and administrative costs, including legal, accounting, and other expenses related to corporate governance, including SEC reporting and compliance. We would also incur the compensation and benefits costs of our officers and other employees and consultants that we now expect will be paid by our
17

Table of Contents

manager or its affiliates. If the expenses we assume as a result of an internalization are higher than the expenses we avoid paying to our manager, our net income per share would be lower as a result of the internalization than it otherwise would have been, potentially decreasing the amount of funds available to distribute to our stockholders and the value of our shares.
If we internalize our management functions, we could have difficulty integrating these functions as a stand-alone entity and we may fail to properly identify the appropriate mix of personnel and capital needed to operate as a stand-alone entity. Additionally, upon any internalization of our manager, certain key personnel may not remain with our manager, but will instead remain employees of CCO Group.
Our participation in a co-ownership arrangement may subject us to risks that otherwise may not be present in other real estate assets.
We may enter into co-ownership arrangements with respect to a portion of the properties we acquire. Co-ownership arrangements involve risks generally not otherwise present with an investment in other real estate assets, such as the following:
the risk that a co-owner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals that are or become inconsistent with our business interests or goals;
the risk that a co-owner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies, objectives or status as a REIT;
the possibility that an individual co-owner might become insolvent or bankrupt, or otherwise default under the applicable mortgage loan financing documents, which may constitute an event of default under all of the applicable mortgage loan financing documents, result in a foreclosure and the loss of all or a substantial portion of the investment made by the co-owner, or allow the bankruptcy court to reject the agreements entered into by the co-owners owning interests in the property;
the possibility that a co-owner might not have adequate liquid assets to make cash advances that may be required in order to fund operations, maintenance and other expenses related to the property, which could result in the loss of current or prospective tenants and may otherwise adversely affect the operation and maintenance of the property, and could cause a default under the applicable mortgage loan financing documents and may result in late charges, penalties and interest, and may lead to the exercise of foreclosure and other remedies by the lender;
the risk that a co-owner could breach agreements related to the property, which may cause a default under, and possibly result in personal liability in connection with, any mortgage loan financing documents applicable to the property, violate applicable securities laws, result in a foreclosure or otherwise adversely affect the property and the co-ownership arrangement;
the risk that we could have limited control and rights, with management decisions made entirely by a third party; and
the possibility that we will not have the right to sell the property at a time that otherwise could result in the property being sold for its maximum value.
In the event that our interests become adverse to those of the other co-owners, we may not have the contractual right to purchase the co-ownership interests from the other co-owners. Even if we are given the opportunity to purchase such co-ownership interests in the future, we cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient funds available at the time to purchase co-ownership interests from the co-owners.
We might want to sell our co-ownership interests in a given property or other investment at a time when the other co-owners in such property or investment do not desire to sell their interests. Therefore, because we anticipate that it will be much more difficult to find a willing buyer for our co-ownership interests in an investment than it would be to find a buyer for a property we owned outright, we may not be able to sell our co-ownership interest in a property at the time we would like to sell.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business in the event we or our manager, our transfer agent or any other party that provides us with essential services experiences cyber incidents, including system failures, or has a deficiency in cybersecurity that causes a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
We, as well as our manager, our transfer agent and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations, are vulnerable to service interruptions or damages from any number of sources, including computer viruses, malware, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing
18

Table of Contents

operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our tenant and stockholder relationships. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those we have outsourced.We have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls to help mitigate cyber incidents, but these measures do not guarantee that a cyber incident will not occur or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. A cyber incident could materially adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on common stock. There also may be liability for any stolen assets or misappropriated Company funds or confidential information. Any material adverse effect experienced by our manager, our transfer agent and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations could, in turn, have an adverse impact on us.
Our commercial construction lending may expose us to increased lending risks.
Our commercial construction lending may expose us to increased lending risks. Construction loans generally expose a lender to greater risk of non‑payment and loss than permanent commercial mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the borrower’s ability to secure permanent take‑out financing, which requires the successful completion of construction and stabilization of the project, or operation of the property with an income stream sufficient to meet operating expenses, including debt service on such replacement financing. For construction loans, increased risks include the accuracy of the estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction, all of which may be affected by unanticipated construction delays and cost over‑runs. Such loans typically involve an expectation that the borrower’s sponsors will contribute sufficient equity funds in order to keep the loan in balance, and the sponsors’ failure or inability to meet this obligation could result in delays in construction or an inability to complete construction. Commercial construction loans also expose the lender to additional risks of contractor non‑performance, or borrower disputes with contractors resulting in mechanic’s or materialmen’s liens on the property and possible further delay in construction. In addition, since such loans generally entail greater risk than mortgage loans on income producing property, we may need to increase our allowance for loan losses in the future to account for the likely increase in probable incurred credit losses associated with such loans. Further, as the lender under a construction loan, we may be obligated to fund all or a significant portion of the loan at one or more future dates. We may not have the funds available at such future date(s) to meet our funding obligations under the loan. In that event, we would likely be in breach of the loan unless we are able to raise the funds from alternative sources, which we may not be able to achieve on favorable terms or at all. In addition, many of our construction loans have multiple lenders and if another lender fails to fund we could be faced with the choice of either funding for that defaulting lender or suffering a delay or protracted interruption in the progress of construction.
Our mezzanine loans involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income‑producing properties.
As of December 31, 2020, we have acquired and originated eight mezzanine loans with a net book value of $89.4 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, we completed foreclosure proceedings to take control of the condominium properties securing these loans. We may continue to invest in mezzanine loans, which sometimes take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying property or more commonly take the form of loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the property or a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the property. These types of assets involve a higher degree of risk than long‑term senior mortgage lending secured by income‑producing real property because the loan may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan‑to‑value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal. Significant losses related to our mezzanine loans would result in operating losses for us and may limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Our loans and investments expose us to risks associated with debt-oriented real estate investments generally.
We have invested in, and will continue to seek to invest in, debt instruments relating to real estate-related assets. As such, we are subject to, among other things, risk of defaults by borrowers in paying debt service on outstanding indebtedness and to other impairments of our loans and investments. Any deterioration of real estate fundamentals could negatively impact our performance by making it more difficult for borrowers of our mortgage loans, or borrower entities, to satisfy their debt payment obligations, increasing the default risk applicable to borrower entities, and/or making it more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Changes in general economic conditions will affect the creditworthiness of borrower entities and/or the value of underlying real estate collateral relating to our investments and may include economic and/or market fluctuations, changes in environmental, zoning and other laws, casualty or condemnation losses, regulatory limitations on rents,
19

Table of Contents

decreases in property values, changes in the appeal of properties to tenants, changes in supply and demand, fluctuations in real estate fundamentals, the financial resources of borrower entities, energy supply shortages, various uninsured or uninsurable risks, natural disasters, political events, terrorism and acts of war, changes in government regulations, changes in real property tax rates and/or tax credits, changes in operating expenses, changes in interest rates, changes in inflation rates, changes in the availability of debt financing and/or mortgage funds which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable, increased mortgage defaults, increases in borrowing rates, negative developments in the economy and/or adverse changes in real estate values generally and other factors that are beyond our control.
We cannot predict the degree to which economic conditions generally, and the conditions for real estate debt investing in particular, will improve or decline. Any declines in the performance of the U.S. and global economies or in the real estate debt markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We operate in a highly competitive market for lending and investment opportunities, which may limit our ability to originate or acquire desirable loans and investments in our target assets.
We operate in a highly competitive market for lending and investment opportunities. A number of entities compete with us to make the types of loans and investments that we seek to make. Our profitability depends, in large part, on our ability to originate or acquire target assets at attractive prices. In originating or acquiring target assets, we compete with a variety of institutional lenders and investors and many other market participants, including specialty finance companies, REITs, commercial banks and thrift institutions, investment banks, insurance companies, hedge funds and other financial institutions. Many competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that may not be available to us. Many of our competitors are not subject to the maintenance of an exemption from the Investment Company Act. Furthermore, competition for originations of, and investments in, our target assets may lead to the yield of such assets decreasing, which may further limit our ability to generate desired returns. Also, as a result of this competition, desirable loans and investments in specific types of target assets may be limited in the future and we may not be able to take advantage of attractive lending and investment opportunities from time to time. We can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and originate loans or make any or all of the types of investments that are described herein.
Our control over certain loans and investments may be limited.
Our ability to manage our portfolio of loans and investments may be limited by the form in which they are made. In certain situations, we:
acquire investments subject to rights of senior classes, special servicers or collateral managers under intercreditor, servicing agreements or securitization documents;
pledge our investments as collateral for financing arrangements;
acquire only a minority and/or a non-controlling participation in an underlying investment;
co-invest with others through partnerships, joint ventures or other entities, thereby acquiring non-controlling interests; or
rely on independent third party management or servicing with respect to the management of an asset.
In addition, in circumstances where we originate or acquire loans relating to borrowers that are owned in whole or part by CCO Group-sponsored investment vehicles, we often forgo all non-economic rights under the loan, including voting rights, so long as CCO Group-sponsored investment vehicles own such borrowers above a certain threshold. Therefore, we may not be able to exercise control over all aspects of our loans or investments. Such financial assets may involve risks not present in investments where senior creditors, junior creditors, servicers, third-party controlling investors or CCO Group-sponsored investment vehicles are not involved. Our rights to control the process following a borrower default may be subject to the rights of senior or junior creditors or servicers whose interests may not be aligned with ours. A partner or co-venturer may have financial difficulties, resulting in a negative impact on such asset, may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with ours, or may be in a position to take action contrary to our investment objectives. In addition, we will generally pay all or a portion of the expenses relating to our joint ventures and we may, in certain circumstances, be liable for the actions of our partners or co-venturers.
Commercial real estate-related investments that are secured, directly or indirectly, by real property are subject to delinquency, foreclosure and loss, which could result in losses to us.
Commercial real estate debt instruments (e.g., mortgages, mezzanine loans and preferred equity) that are secured by commercial property are subject to risks of delinquency and foreclosure and risks of loss. The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by an income-producing property typically is dependent primarily upon the successful operation of the property
20

Table of Contents

rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Net operating income of an income-producing property can be affected by, among other things:
tenant mix and tenant bankruptcies;
success of tenant businesses;
property management decisions, including with respect to capital improvements, particularly in older building structures;
property location and condition;
competition from other properties offering the same or similar services;
changes in laws that increase operating expenses or limit rents that may be charged;
any liabilities relating to environmental matters at the property;
changes in global, national, regional, or local economic conditions and/or specific industry segments;
global trade disruption, significant introductions of trade barriers and bilateral trade frictions;
declines in global, national, regional or local real estate values;
declines in global, national, regional or local rental or occupancy rates;
changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and in the state of the credit and securitization markets and the debt and equity capital markets, including diminished availability or lack of debt financing for commercial real estate;
changes in real estate tax rates, tax credits and other operating expenses;
changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including income tax regulations and environmental legislation;
acts of God, terrorism, social unrest and civil disturbances, which may decrease the availability of or increase the cost of insurance or result in uninsured losses; and
adverse changes in zoning laws.
In addition, we are exposed to the risk of judicial proceedings with our borrowers and entities we invest in, including bankruptcy or other litigation, as a strategy to avoid foreclosure or enforcement of other rights by us as a lender or investor. In the event that any of the properties or entities underlying or collateralizing our loans or investments experiences any of the foregoing events or occurrences, the value of, and return on, such investments could be reduced, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our secured debt agreements impose, and additional lending facilities may impose, restrictive covenants, which may restrict our flexibility to determine our operating policies and investment strategy.
We borrow funds under secured debt agreements with various counterparties. The documents that govern these secured debt agreements and the related guarantees contain, and additional lending facilities may contain, customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants applicable to us that may restrict our flexibility to determine our operating policies and investment strategy. In particular, these agreements may require us to maintain specified minimum levels of capacity under our credit facilities and cash. As a result, we may not be able to leverage our assets as fully as we would otherwise choose, which could reduce our return on assets. If we are unable to meet these collateral obligations, our financial condition and prospects could deteriorate significantly. In addition, lenders may require that our manager or one or more of our manager’s executives continue to serve in such capacity. If we fail to meet or satisfy any of these covenants, we would be in default under these agreements, and our lenders could elect to declare outstanding amounts due and payable, terminate their commitments, require the posting of additional collateral and enforce their interests against existing collateral. We may also be subject to cross-default and acceleration rights in our other debt arrangements. Further, this could also make it difficult for us to satisfy the distribution requirements necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Difficulty in redeploying the proceeds from repayments of our existing loans and other investments could materially and adversely affect us.
As our loans and other investments are repaid, we may attempt to redeploy the proceeds we receive into new loans and investments and repay borrowings under our secured revolving repurchase agreements and other financing arrangements. It is possible that we will fail to identify reinvestment options that would provide a yield and/or a risk profile that is comparable to the asset that was repaid. If we fail to redeploy the proceeds we receive from repayment of a loan or other investment in equivalent or better alternatives, we could be materially and adversely affected.
21

Table of Contents

In addition, we may continue to invest in CMBS as part of our investment strategy. Subordinate interests such as CMBS and similar structured finance investments generally are not actively traded and are relatively illiquid investments. Volatility in CMBS trading markets may cause the value of these investments to decline. In addition, if the underlying mortgage portfolio has been overvalued by the originator, or if the values subsequently decline and, as a result, less collateral value is available to satisfy interest and principal payments and any other fees in connection with the trust or other conduit arrangement for such securities, we may incur significant losses.
If we are unable to successfully integrate new assets and manage our growth, our results of operations and financial condition may suffer.
We have in the past and may in the future significantly increase the size and/or change the mix of our portfolio of assets. We may be unable to successfully and efficiently integrate newly-acquired assets into our existing portfolio or otherwise effectively manage our assets or our growth effectively. In addition, increases in our portfolio of assets and/or changes in the mix of our assets may place significant demands on our manager’s administrative, operational, asset management, financial and other resources. Any failure to manage increases in size effectively could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Prepayment rates may adversely affect our financial performance and cash flows and the value of certain of our investments.
Our mortgage loan borrowers may be able to repay their loans prior to their stated maturities. In periods of declining interest rates and/or credit spreads, prepayment rates on loans generally increase. If general interest rates or credit spreads decline at the same time, the proceeds of such prepayments received during such periods may not be reinvested for some period of time or may be reinvested by us in comparable assets yielding less than the yields on the assets that were prepaid.
When mortgage loans are not originated or acquired at a premium to par value, prepayment rates do not materially affect the value of such loan assets. However, the value of certain other assets may be affected by prepayment rates. For example, if we acquire fixed rate CRE debt securities investments or other fixed rate mortgage-related securities, or a pool of such fixed rate mortgage-related securities, we anticipate that the mortgage loans underlying these fixed rate securities will prepay at a projected rate generating an expected yield. If we were to purchase these securities at a premium to par value, when borrowers prepay the mortgage loans underlying these securities faster than expected, the increase in corresponding prepayments on these securities will likely reduce the expected yield. Conversely, if we were to purchase these securities at a discount to par value, when borrowers prepay the mortgage loans underlying these securities slower than expected, the decrease in corresponding prepayments on these securities will likely increase the expected yield. In addition, if we were to purchase these securities at a discount to par value, when borrowers prepay the mortgage loans underlying these securities faster than expected, the increase in corresponding prepayments on these securities will likely increase the expected yield.
Prepayment rates on floating rate and fixed rate loans may differ in different interest rate environments, and may be affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the availability of mortgage credit, the relative economic vitality of the area in which the related properties are located, the servicing of the loans, possible changes in tax laws, other opportunities for investment, and other economic, social, geographic, demographic and legal factors, all of which are beyond our control, and structural factors such as call protection. Consequently, such prepayment rates cannot be predicted with certainty and no strategy can completely insulate us from prepayment risk.
We are subject to additional risks associated with investments in the form of loan participation interests.
We have in the past invested, and may in the future invest, in loan participation interests in which another lender or lenders share with us the rights, obligations and benefits of a commercial mortgage loan made by an originating lender to a borrower. Accordingly, we will not be in privity of contract with a borrower because the other lender or participant is the record holder of the loan and, therefore, we will not have any direct right to any underlying collateral for the loan. These loan participations may be senior, pari passu or junior to the interests of the other lender or lenders in respect of distributions from the commercial mortgage loan. Furthermore, we may not be able to control the pursuit of any rights or remedies under the commercial mortgage loan, including enforcement proceedings in the event of default thereunder. In certain cases, the original lender or another participant may be able to take actions in respect of the commercial mortgage loan that are not in our best interests. In addition, in the event that (1) the owner of the loan participation interest does not have the benefit of a perfected security interest in the lender’s rights to payments from the borrower under the commercial mortgage loan or (2) there are substantial differences between the terms of the commercial mortgage loan and those of the applicable loan participation interest, such loan participation interest could be recharacterized as an unsecured loan to a lender that is the record holder of the loan in such lender’s bankruptcy, and the assets of such lender may not be sufficient to satisfy the terms of such loan participation interest. Accordingly, we may face greater risks from loan participation interests than if we had made first mortgage loans directly to the owners of real estate collateral.
22

Table of Contents

If the loans that we originate or acquire do not comply with applicable laws, we may be subject to penalties, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Loans that we originate or acquire may be directly or indirectly subject to U.S. federal, state or local governmental laws. Real estate lenders and borrowers may be responsible for compliance with a wide range of laws intended to protect the public interest, including, without limitation, the Truth in Lending, Equal Credit Opportunity, Fair Housing and Americans with Disabilities Acts and local zoning laws (including, but not limited to, zoning laws that allow permitted non-conforming uses). If we or any other person fails to comply with such laws in relation to a loan that we have originated or acquired, legal penalties may be imposed, which could materially and adversely affect us. Additionally, jurisdictions with “one action,” “security first” and/or “antideficiency rules” may limit our ability to foreclose on a real property or to realize on obligations secured by a real property. In the future, new laws may be enacted or imposed by U.S. federal, state or local governmental entities, and such laws could have a material adverse effect on us.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with our manager and its affiliates, including the material conflicts discussed below. The “Conflicts of Interest” section of Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K provides a more detailed discussion of the conflicts of interest between us and our manager and its affiliates, and our policies to reduce or eliminate certain potential conflicts.
Our manager and its affiliates face conflicts of interest caused by their compensation arrangements with us, including significant compensation that may be required to be paid to our manager if our manager is terminated, which could result in actions that are not in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.
Our manager and its affiliates are entitled to substantial fees from us under the terms of the Management Agreement. These fees could influence the judgment of our manager and its affiliates in performing services for us. Among other matters, these compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:
the continuation, renewal or enforcement of our agreements with our manager and its affiliates, including the Management Agreement;
property acquisitions from other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, which might entitle affiliates of our manager to real estate commissions and possible success-based sale fees in connection with its services for the seller;
property acquisitions from third parties, which entitle our manager to advisory fees;
property or asset dispositions, which may entitle our manager or its affiliates to disposition fees;
borrowings to acquire properties, which borrowings will increase the acquisition and advisory fees payable to our manager; and
how and when to recommend to our Board a proposed strategy to provide our stockholders with liquidity, which proposed strategy, if implemented, could entitle our manager to the payment of significant fees.
Our Investment Advisor has engaged its sub-advisor to select and manage our investment securities. Our Investment Advisor relies on the performance of its sub-advisor in implementing the investment securities portion of our investment strategy.
Our Investment Advisor has engaged its sub-advisor to select investment securities pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement between our Investment Advisor and its sub-advisor. The sub-advisor has, and will continue to have substantial discretion, within our investment guidelines, to make decisions related to the acquisition, management and disposition of our investment securities. If the sub-advisor does not succeed in implementing the investment securities portion of our investment strategy, our performance will suffer. In addition, even though our Investment Advisor has the ability to terminate the sub-advisor at any time, it may be difficult and costly to terminate and replace the sub-advisor.
We do not have a direct contractual relationship with the sub-advisor. Therefore, it may be difficult for us to take enforcement action against the sub-advisor if its actions, performance or non-performance do not comply with the agreement.
We are not a party to the agreement with the sub-advisor pursuant to which the sub-advisor selects investment securities. Therefore, we are dependent upon our Investment Advisor to manage and monitor the sub-advisor effectively. The sub-advisor may take actions that are not in our best interest, which could cause our performance to suffer, and as we are not a party to the agreement with the sub-advisor, we are limited in our ability to enforce that agreement.
23

Table of Contents

Our manager faces conflicts of interest relating to the incentive fee structure under our Management Agreement, which could result in actions that are not necessarily in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.
Pursuant to the terms of our Management Agreement, our manager is entitled to incentive compensation that is structured in a manner intended to provide incentives to our manager to perform in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders. However, because our manager does not maintain a significant equity interest in us and is entitled to receive certain fees regardless of performance, our manager’s interests are not wholly aligned with those of our stockholders. Furthermore, our manager could be motivated to recommend riskier or more speculative acquisitions in order for us to generate the specified levels of performance or sales proceeds that would entitle our manager to performance-based fees. In addition, our manager will have substantial influence with respect to how and when our Board elects to provide liquidity to our stockholders, and these performance-based fees could influence our manager’s recommendations to us in this regard. Our manager also has the right to terminate the Management Agreement upon 60 days’ written notice without cause or penalty which, under certain circumstances, could result in our manager earning a performance fee. This could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control.
Other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, as well as CIM and certain of its affiliates, use investment strategies that are similar to ours; therefore, our executive officers and the officers and key personnel of our manager and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase and leasing of properties, and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor.
CIM Income NAV and CIM and its affiliates may have investment objectives, strategy and criteria, including targeted asset types, substantially similar to ours. As a result, we may be seeking to acquire properties and real estate-related assets, including mortgage loans, at the same time as CIM or its affiliates, or one or more of the other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group or its affiliates. Certain of our executive officers and certain officers of our manager also are executive officers of CIM or its affiliates and other programs sponsored by CCO Group or its affiliates, the general partners of other private investment programs sponsored by CCO Group or its affiliates and/or the advisors or fiduciaries of other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group or its affiliates. Accordingly, there is a risk that the allocation of acquisition opportunities may result in our acquiring a property that provides lower returns to us than a property purchased by another real estate program sponsored by CCO Group or its affiliates.
In addition, we have acquired, and may continue to acquire, properties in geographic areas where CIM or its affiliates or other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group or its affiliates, own properties. If one of these other real estate programs attracts a tenant that we are competing for, we could suffer a loss of revenue due to delays in locating another suitable tenant.
Our officers, certain of our directors and our manager, including its key personnel and officers, face conflicts of interest related to the positions they hold with affiliated and unaffiliated entities, which could hinder our ability to successfully implement our business strategy and to generate returns to our stockholders.
Richard S. Ressler, the chairman of our Board, chief executive officer and president, who is also a founder and principal of CIM and is an officer or director of certain of its affiliates including CMFT Management, is the chairman of the board, chief executive officer and president of CIM Income NAV. One of our directors, Avraham Shemesh, who is also a founder and principal of CIM and is an officer or director of certain of its affiliates including CMFT Management, serves as a director of CIM Income NAV. One of our directors, Elaine Y. Wong, who is also a principal of CIM, serves as a director of CIM Income NAV. One of our independent directors, W. Brian Kretzmer, also serves as a director of CIM Income NAV. Our chief financial officer and treasurer, Nathan D. DeBacker, who is also an officer of other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, is a vice president of CMFT Management and is an officer of certain of its affiliates. In addition, affiliates of CMFT Management act as an advisor to CIM Income NAV. CIM Income NAV, which primarily focuses on the acquisition and management of commercial properties in the retail, office and industrial sectors subject to long-term net leases to creditworthy tenants and has acquired or may acquire assets similar to ours.
Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to (1) allocation of new acquisition opportunities, management time and operational expertise among us and the other entities, (2) our purchase of properties from, or sale of properties to, affiliated entities, (3) the timing and terms of the acquisition or sale of an asset, (4) development of our properties by affiliates, (5) investments with affiliates of our manager, (6) compensation to our manager and its affiliates, and (7) our relationship with, and compensation to, our dealer manager. Even if these persons do not violate their duties to us and our stockholders, they will have competing demands on their time and resources and may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and resources among us and these other entities and persons. Should such persons devote insufficient time or resources to our business, returns on our investments may suffer.
The officers and affiliates of CMFT Management will try to balance our interests with the interests of CIM and its affiliates and other programs sponsored or operated by our sponsor, CCO Group, which includes CCO Group, LLC, an affiliate of CIM,
24

Table of Contents

and certain of its subsidiaries, including our manager, our dealer manager, and our property manager, to whom they owe duties. However, to the extent that these persons take actions that are more favorable to other entities than to us, these actions could have a negative impact on our financial performance and, consequently, on distributions to our stockholders and the value of their investments.
We may acquire assets and borrow funds from affiliates of our manager, and sell or lease our assets to affiliates of our manager, and any such transaction could result in conflicts of interest.
We are permitted to acquire properties from affiliates of our manager, provided that, pursuant to the Management Agreement, our manager shall not consummate on our behalf any transaction that involves the sale of any real estate or real-estate related asset to, or the acquisition of any such asset from, our manager or its affiliates, including CIM, and any funds managed by CIM or its affiliates, unless such transaction is on terms no less favorable to the us than could have been obtained on an arm's length basis from an unrelated third party and has been approved in advance by a majority of our independent directors. In the event that we acquire a property from an affiliate of our manager, we may be foregoing an opportunity to acquire a different property that might be more advantageous to us. In addition, we are permitted to borrow funds from affiliates of our manager, including our sponsor, and to sell and lease our assets to affiliates of our manager, and we have not established a policy that specifically addresses how we will determine the sale or lease price in any such transaction. Any such borrowings, sale or lease transaction must be approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in such transaction as being fair and reasonable to us. To the extent that we acquire any properties from affiliates of our manager, borrow funds from affiliates of our manager or sell or lease our assets to affiliates of our manager, such transactions could result in a conflict of interest.
Our manager faces conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures or other co-ownership arrangements that we may enter into with CIM or its affiliates, or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CCO Group, which could result in a disproportionate benefit to CIM or its affiliates, or another real estate program sponsored by CCO Group.
We may enter into joint ventures or co-ownership arrangements (including co-investment transactions) with CIM or its affiliates, or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CCO Group for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties, as well as the acquisition of real estate-related assets. Since one or more of the officers of our manager are officers of CIM or its affiliates, including CCO Group and/or the advisors to other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, our manager may face conflicts of interest in determining which real estate program should enter into any particular joint venture or co-ownership arrangement. These persons also may have a conflict in structuring the terms of the relationship between us and any affiliated co-venturer or co-owner, as well as conflicts of interests in managing the joint venture, which may result in the co-venturer or co-owner receiving benefits greater than the benefits that we receive.
In the event we enter into joint venture or other co-ownership arrangements with CIM or its affiliates, or another real estate program sponsored by CCO Group, our manager and its affiliates may have a conflict of interest when determining when and whether to buy or sell a particular property, or to make or dispose of another real estate-related asset. In addition, if we become listed for trading on a national securities exchange, we may develop more divergent goals and objectives from any affiliated co-venturer or co-owner that is not listed for trading. In the event we enter into a joint venture or other co-ownership arrangement with another real estate program sponsored by CIM or its affiliates, or another real estate investment program sponsored by CCO Group that has a term shorter than ours, the joint venture may be required to sell its properties earlier than we may desire to sell the properties. Even if the terms of any joint venture or other co-ownership agreement between us and CIM or its affiliates, or another real estate program sponsored by CCO Group grants us the right of first refusal to buy such properties, we may not have sufficient funds or borrowing capacity to exercise our right of first refusal under these circumstances. We have adopted certain procedures for dealing with potential conflicts of interest as further described in Part I, Item 1. Business — Conflicts of Interest in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results.
An effective system of internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports, prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. As part of our ongoing monitoring of internal controls, we may discover material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal controls that we believe require remediation. If we discover such weaknesses, we will make efforts to improve our internal controls in a timely manner. Any system of internal controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure to maintain effective internal controls, or implement any necessary improvements in a timely manner, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock, or cause us to not meet our reporting obligations. Ineffective internal controls could also cause holders of
25

Table of Contents

our securities to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which would likely have a negative effect on our business.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
Our charter permits our Board to authorize the issuance of stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of common stockholders or discourage a third party from acquiring us in a manner that could result in a premium price to our stockholders.
Our charter permits our Board to authorize the issuance of up to 500,000,000 shares of stock, of which 490,000,000 shares are classified as common stock and 10,000,000 shares are classified as preferred stock. In addition, our Board, without any action by our stockholders, may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we have authority to issue. The Board may classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock into other classes or series of stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of any such stock. Shares of our common stock shall be subject to the express terms of any series of our preferred stock. Thus, our Board could authorize the issuance of preferred stock with terms and conditions that have a priority as to distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation over the rights of the holders of our common stock. Preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing the removal of incumbent management or a change of control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium to the purchase price of our common stock for our stockholders.
Maryland law prohibits certain business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us to be acquired and may limit our stockholders’ ability to dispose of their shares.
Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock; or
an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation.
A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if our Board approved in advance the transaction by which the person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, our Board may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by our Board.
After the five-year prohibition, any such business combination between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder.
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. The business combination statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by our Board prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Pursuant to the statute, our Board has exempted any business combination involving our manager or any affiliate of our manager. As a result, our manager and any affiliate of our manager may be able to enter into business combinations with us that may not be in the best interest of our stockholders, without compliance with the super-majority vote requirements and the other provisions of the statute. The business combination statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
26

Table of Contents

Maryland law also limits the ability of a third party to buy a large percentage of our outstanding shares and exercise voting control in electing directors.
Under its Control Share Acquisition Act, Maryland law also provides that a holder of “control shares” of a Maryland corporation acquired in a “control share acquisition” has no voting rights with respect to such shares except to the extent approved by the corporation’s disinterested stockholders by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares of stock owned by interested stockholders, that is, by the acquirer, or officers of the corporation or employees of the corporation who are directors of the corporation, are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. “Control shares” are voting shares of stock that would entitle the acquirer, except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy, to exercise voting control in electing directors within specified ranges of voting control. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of control shares. The control share acquisition statute does not apply (a) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Acquisition Act any acquisition of shares of our stock by CCO Group, LLC or any affiliate of CCO Group, LLC. This provision may be amended or eliminated at any time in the future. If this provision were amended or eliminated, this statute could have the effect of discouraging offers from third parties to acquire us and increasing the difficulty of successfully completing this type of offer by anyone other than our manager or any of its affiliates.
Our charter includes a provision that may discourage a stockholder from launching a tender offer for our shares.
Our charter requires that any tender offer, including any “mini-tender” offer, must comply with most of the requirements of Regulation 14D of the Exchange Act. The offering person must provide us notice of the tender offer at least ten business days before initiating the tender offer. If the offering person does not comply with these requirements, our stockholders will be prohibited from transferring any shares to such non-complying person unless they first offered such shares to us at the tender offer price offered by the non-complying person. In addition, the non-complying person shall be responsible for all of our expenses in connection with that person’s noncompliance. This provision of our charter may discourage a person from initiating a tender offer for our shares and prevent our stockholders from receiving a premium to the purchase price for their shares in such a transaction.
If we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we could not continue our current business plan, which may significantly reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We intend to conduct our operations, and the operations of our operating partnership and any other subsidiaries, so that no such entity meets the definition of an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. Under the Investment Company Act, in relevant part, a company is an “investment company” if:
pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(A), it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or
pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(C), it is engaged, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis (the 40% test). “Investment securities” exclude U.S. government securities and securities of majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.
We intend to monitor our operations and our assets on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, meet the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. If we were obligated to register as an investment company, we would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act imposing, among other things:
limitations on capital structure;
restrictions on specified investments;
prohibitions on transactions with affiliates;
compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations that would significantly change our operations; and
potentially, compliance with daily valuation requirements.
In order for us to not meet the definition of an “investment company” and avoid regulation under the Investment Company Act, we must engage primarily in the business of buying real estate. To avoid meeting the definition of an “investment
27

Table of Contents

company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. Similarly, we may have to acquire additional income or loss generating assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forgo opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy. Accordingly, our Board may not be able to change our investment policies as it may deem appropriate if such change would cause us to meet the definition of an “investment company.” In addition, a change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect our ability to avoid being required to register as an investment company. If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court were to require enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.
The Board may change certain of our policies without stockholder approval, which could alter the nature of our stockholders’ investment. If our stockholders do not agree with the decisions of our Board, they only have limited control over changes in our policies and operations and may not be able to change such policies and operations.
The Board determines our major policies, including our policies regarding investments, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. The Board may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of our stockholders. As a result, the nature of our stockholders’ investment could change without their consent. Under the MGCL and our charter, our stockholders generally have a right to vote only on the following:
the election or removal of directors;
an amendment of our charter, except that our Board may amend our charter without stockholder approval to increase or decrease the aggregate number of our shares or the number of our shares of any class or series that we have the authority to issue, to change our name, to change the name or other designation or the par value of any class or series of our stock and the aggregate par value of our stock or to effect certain reverse stock splits; provided, however, that any such amendment does not adversely affect the rights, preferences and privileges of the stockholders;
our dissolution; and
a merger or consolidation, a statutory share exchange or the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets.
All other matters are subject to the discretion of our Board.
The power of our Board to revoke our REIT election without stockholder approval may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders.
Our organizational documents permit our Board to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if our Board determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. In such a case, we would become subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax on our net taxable income and we would no longer be required to distribute most of our net taxable income to our stockholders, which could have adverse consequences on the total return to holders of our common stock.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover claims against our officers, directors and our manager are limited, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery against them if they cause us to incur losses.
The MGCL provides that a director has no liability in such capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the corporation’s best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Our charter, in the case of our directors and officers, and the Management Agreement, in the case of our manager and its affiliates, require us, subject to certain exceptions, to indemnify and advance expenses to our directors, our officers, and our manager and its affiliates. Our charter permits us to provide such indemnification and advance for expenses to our employees and agents. Additionally, our charter limits, subject to certain exceptions, the liability of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders for monetary damages. Although our charter does not allow us to indemnify our directors or our manager and its affiliates for any liability or loss suffered by them or hold harmless our directors or our manager and its affiliates for any loss or liability suffered by us to a greater extent than permitted under Maryland law, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors, officers, employees and agents, and our manager and its affiliates, than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery against them. In addition, our manager is not required to retain cash to pay potential liabilities and it may not have sufficient cash available to pay liabilities if they arise. If our manager is held liable for a breach of its fiduciary duty to us, or a breach of its contractual obligations to us, we may not be able to collect the full amount of any claims we may have against our manager. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors, officers, employees and agents or our manager in some cases, which would decrease the cash otherwise available for distribution to our stockholders.
28

Table of Contents

Our stockholders’ interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares.
Our stockholders do not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. Our charter authorizes 500,000,000 shares of stock, of which 490,000,000 shares are classified as common stock and 10,000,000 shares are classified as preferred stock. Subject to any limitations set forth under Maryland law, our Board may amend our charter from time to time to increase the number of authorized shares of stock, increase or decrease the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we have authority to issue, or classify or reclassify any unissued shares into other classes or series of stock without the necessity of obtaining stockholder approval. All of such shares may be issued in the discretion of our Board. Our stockholders will suffer dilution of their equity investment in us, in the event that we (1) reinstate and issue shares pursuant to our Secondary DRIP Offering, (2) sell securities that are convertible into shares of our common stock, (3) issue shares of our common stock in a private offering of securities to institutional investors, (4) issue shares of our common stock to our manager, its successors or assigns, in payment of an outstanding fee obligation as set forth under our Management Agreement or (5) issue shares of our common stock to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of our operating partnership. In addition, the partnership agreement of our operating partnership contains provisions that would allow, under certain circumstances, other entities, including other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group, to merge into or cause the exchange or conversion of their interest in that entity for interests of our operating partnership. Because the limited partnership interests of our operating partnership may, in the discretion of our Board, be exchanged for shares of our common stock, any merger, exchange or conversion between our operating partnership and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders.
Our Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust (“UPREIT”) structure may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners in our operating partnership whose interests may not be aligned with those of our stockholders.
Our directors and officers have duties to our corporation and our stockholders under Maryland law in connection with their management of the corporation. At the same time, we, as general partner, have fiduciary duties under Delaware law to our operating partnership and to the limited partners in connection with the management of our operating partnership. If we admit outside limited partners to our operating partnership, our duties as general partner of our operating partnership and its partners may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to the corporation and our stockholders. Under Delaware law, a general partner of a Delaware limited partnership owes its limited partners the duties of good faith and fair dealing. Other duties, including fiduciary duties, may be modified or eliminated in the partnership’s partnership agreement. The partnership agreement of our operating partnership provides that, for so long as we own a controlling interest in our operating partnership, any conflict that cannot be resolved in a manner not adverse to either our stockholders or the limited partners will be resolved in favor of our stockholders.
Additionally, the partnership agreement expressly limits our liability by providing that we and our officers, directors, agents and employees, will not be liable or accountable to our operating partnership for losses sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not derived if we or our officers, directors, agents or employees acted in good faith. In addition, our operating partnership is required to indemnify us and our officers, directors, employees, agents and designees to the extent permitted by applicable law from and against any and all claims arising from operations of our operating partnership, unless it is established that: (1) the act or omission was committed in bad faith, was fraudulent or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; (2) the indemnified party received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or (3) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the indemnified person had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.
The provisions of Delaware law that allow the fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been tested in a court of law, and we have not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict our fiduciary duties.
The limit on the percentage of shares of our common stock that any person may own may discourage a takeover or business combination that may benefit our stockholders.
Our charter restricts the direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.8% of the value of our then outstanding capital stock (which includes common stock and any preferred stock we may issue) and no more than 9.8% of the value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the then outstanding shares of our common stock unless exempted (prospectively or retroactively) by our Board. These restrictions may discourage a change of control of us and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for shares of our common stock on terms that might be financially attractive to stockholders or which may cause a change in our management. In addition to deterring potential transactions that may be favorable to our stockholders, these provisions may also decrease the ability of stockholders to sell their shares of our common stock.
29

Table of Contents

General Risks Related to Real Estate Assets
Adverse economic, regulatory and geographic conditions that have an impact on the real estate market in general may prevent us from being profitable or from realizing growth in the value of our real estate properties, and could have a significant negative impact on us.
Our operating results will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:
changes in international, national or local economic or geographic conditions (including as a result of the outbreak of COVID-19 that began in the fourth quarter of 2019);
changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area;
changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds that may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive;
the illiquidity of real estate assets generally;
changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws; and
periods of high interest rates and tight money supply.
The outbreak of COVID-19 that began in the fourth quarter of 2019 has led to an economic slowdown and recession in the United States. During periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for real estate, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in rents or an increased incidence of defaults under existing leases. The extent to which federal, state or local governmental authorities grant rent relief or other relief or enact amnesty programs applicable to our tenants in response to the COVID-19 outbreak will exacerbate the negative impacts that a slow down or recession will have on us. If we cannot operate our properties so as to meet our financial expectations, because of these or other risks, we may be prevented from being profitable or growing the values of our real estate properties, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions to our stockholders may be significantly negatively impacted.
We are primarily dependent on single-tenant leases for our revenue and, accordingly, if we are unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, or re-lease space as leases expire on favorable terms or at all, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We focus our investment activities on ownership of primarily freestanding, single-tenant commercial properties that are net leased to a single tenant. Therefore, the financial failure of, or other default by, a significant tenant or multiple tenants could cause a material reduction in our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, to the extent that we enter into a master lease with a particular tenant, the termination of such master lease could affect each property subject to the master lease, resulting in the loss of revenue from all such properties.
We cannot assure our stockholders that our leases will be renewed or that we will be able to lease or re-lease the properties on favorable terms, or at all, or that lease terminations will not cause us to sell the properties at a loss. Any of our properties that become vacant could be difficult to re-lease or sell. We have and may continue to experience vacancies either by the default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. We typically must incur all of the costs of ownership for a property that is vacant. Upon or pending the expiration of leases at our properties, we may be required to make rent or other concessions to tenants, or accommodate requests for renovations, remodeling and other improvements, in order to retain and attract tenants. Certain of our properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a tenant (e.g., a restaurant) and major renovations and expenditures may be required in order for us to re-lease the space for other uses. If the vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues and increased costs, resulting in less cash available for distribution to our stockholders and unitholders of CMFT OP. If we are unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults, or re-lease space as leases expire on favorable terms or at all, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We are subject to geographic and industry concentrations that make us more susceptible to adverse events with respect to certain geographic areas or industries.
As of December 31, 2020, we had derived approximately:
11% of our 2020 annualized rental income from tenants in California; and
12%, 11% and 10% of our 2020 annualized rental income from tenants in the sporting goods, home and garden and discount store industries, respectively.
30

Table of Contents

Any adverse change in the financial condition of a tenant with whom we may have a significant credit concentration now or in the future, or any downturn of the economy in any state or industry in which we may have a significant credit concentration now or in the future, could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.
If a major tenant declares bankruptcy, we may be unable to collect balances due under relevant leases, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants may adversely affect the income produced by our properties. Under bankruptcy law, a tenant cannot be evicted solely because of its bankruptcy and has the option to assume or reject any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, any resulting claim we have for breach of the lease (excluding collateral securing the claim) will be treated as a general unsecured claim. Our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid and future rent will be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and it is unlikely that a bankrupt tenant that rejects its lease would pay in full amounts it owes us under the lease. Even if a lease is assumed and brought current, we still run the risk that a tenant could condition lease assumption on a restructuring of certain terms, including rent, that would have an adverse impact on us. Any shortfall resulting from the bankruptcy of one or more of our tenants could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
In addition, the financial failure of, or other default by, one or more of the tenants to whom we have exposure could have an adverse effect on the results of our operations. While we evaluate the creditworthiness of our tenants by reviewing available financial and other pertinent information, there can be no assurance that any tenant will be able to make timely rental payments or avoid defaulting under its lease. If any of our tenants’ businesses experience significant adverse changes, they may fail to make rental payments when due, close a number of stores, exercise early termination rights (to the extent such rights are available to the tenant) or declare bankruptcy. A default by a significant tenant or multiple tenants could cause a material reduction in our revenues and operating cash flows. In addition, if a tenant defaults, we may incur substantial costs in protecting our assets.
If a sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized in a tenant’s bankruptcy proceeding, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We may enter into sale-leaseback transactions, whereby we would purchase a property and then lease the same property back to the person from whom we purchased it. In the event of the bankruptcy of a tenant, a transaction structured as a sale-leaseback might be re-characterized as either a financing or a joint venture, either of which outcomes could adversely affect our financial condition, cash flows and the amount available for distributions to our stockholders.
If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a financing, we would not be considered the owner of the property, and as a result would have the status of a creditor in relation to the tenant. In that event, we would no longer have the right to sell or encumber our ownership interest in the property. Instead, we would have a claim against the tenant for the amounts owed under the lease, with the claim arguably secured by the property. The tenant/debtor might have the ability to propose a plan restructuring the term, interest rate and amortization schedule of its outstanding balance. If confirmed by the bankruptcy court, we could be bound by the new terms, and prevented from foreclosing our lien on the property. If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a joint venture, we and our tenant could be treated as co-venturers with regard to the property. As a result, we could be held liable, under some circumstances, for debts incurred by the tenant relating to the property.
We have assumed, and in the future may assume, liabilities in connection with our property acquisitions, including unknown liabilities.
In connection with the acquisition of properties, we may assume existing liabilities, some of which may have been unknown or unquantifiable at the time of the transaction. Unknown liabilities might include liabilities for cleanup or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions, claims of tenants or other persons dealing with the sellers prior to our acquisition of the properties, tax liabilities, and accrued but unpaid liabilities whether incurred in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. If the magnitude of such unknown liabilities is high, either singly or in the aggregate, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, cash flows or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
Challenging economic conditions could adversely affect vacancy rates, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to make distributions and the value of an investment in our shares.
Challenging economic conditions, the availability and cost of credit, turmoil in the mortgage market, and declining real estate markets may contribute to increased vacancy rates in the commercial real estate sector. If we experience vacancy rates that are higher than historical vacancy rates, we may have to offer lower rental rates and greater tenant improvements or
31

Table of Contents

concessions than expected. Increased vacancies may have a greater impact on us, as compared to REITs with other investment strategies, as our investment approach relies on long-term leases in order to provide a relatively stable stream of income for our stockholders. As a result, increased vacancy rates could have the following negative effects on us:
the values of our commercial properties could decrease below the amount paid for such assets;
revenues from such properties could decrease due to low or no rental income during vacant periods, lower future rental rates and/or increase tenant improvement expenses or concessions;
ownership costs could increase;
revenues from such properties that secure loans could decrease, making it more difficult for us to meet our payment obligations; and/or
the resale value of such properties could decline.
All of these factors could impair our ability to make distributions and decrease the value of an investment in our shares.
Uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could materially adversely affect our financial condition and cash flows, and there can be no assurance as to future costs and the scope of coverage that may be available under insurance policies.
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in our portfolio under one or more blanket insurance policies with policy specifications, limits and deductibles customarily carried for similar properties. In addition, we carry professional liability and directors’ and officers’ insurance, and cyber liability insurance. While we select policy specifications and insured limits that we believe are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, insurance coverages provided by tenants, the cost of the coverage and industry practice, there can be no assurance that we will not experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits. In addition, we may reduce or discontinue terrorism, earthquake, flood or other insurance on some or all of our properties in the future if the cost of premiums for any of these policies exceeds, in our judgment, the value of the coverage discounted for the risk of loss. Our title insurance policies may not insure for the current aggregate market value of our portfolio, and we do not intend to increase our title insurance coverage as the market value of our portfolio increases.
Further, we do not carry insurance for certain losses, including, but not limited to, losses caused by earthquakes, riots or acts of war because such losses may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable. If we experience a loss that is uninsured or which exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged. In addition, we carry several different lines of insurance, placed with several large insurance carriers. If any one of these large insurance carriers were to become insolvent, we would be forced to replace the existing insurance coverage with another suitable carrier, and any outstanding claims would be at risk for collection. In such an event, we cannot be certain that we would be able to replace the coverage at similar or otherwise favorable terms. As a result of any of the situations described above, our financial condition and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
We may be unable to secure funds for future leasing commissions, tenant improvements or capital needs, which could adversely impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
When tenants do not renew their leases or otherwise vacate their space, we are typically required to expend substantial funds for leasing commissions, tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to the vacated space. In addition, although we expect that our leases with tenants will require tenants to pay routine property maintenance costs, we could be responsible for any major structural repairs, such as repairs to the foundation, exterior walls and rooftops. The capital to fund these activities may come from cash flows from operations, borrowings, property sales or future equity offerings. However, these sources of funding may not be available on attractive terms or at all, and we may be required to defer necessary improvements to a property, which may cause that property to suffer from a greater risk of obsolescence or a decline in value, or a greater risk of decreased operating cash flows as a result of fewer potential tenants being attracted to the property. If this happens, our assets may generate lower cash flows or decline in value, or both.
Our properties may be subject to impairment charges.
We routinely evaluate our real estate assets for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as market conditions, tenant performance and lease structure. For example, the early termination of, or default under, a lease by a tenant may lead to an impairment charge. Since our investment focus is on properties net leased to a single tenant, the financial failure of, or other default by, a single tenant under its lease may result in a significant impairment loss. If we determine that an impairment has occurred, we would be required to make a downward
32

Table of Contents

adjustment to the net carrying value of the property, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the impairment charge is recorded. Management has recorded an impairment charge related to certain properties in the year ended December 31, 2020, and may record future impairments based on actual results and changes in circumstances. Negative developments in the real estate market may cause management to reevaluate the business and macro-economic assumptions used in its impairment analysis. Changes in management’s assumptions based on actual results may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. See Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our real estate impairment charge.
We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so, including as a result of uncertain market conditions.
Real estate assets are, in general, relatively illiquid and may become even more illiquid during periods of economic downturn. As a result, we may not be able to sell our properties quickly or on favorable terms in response to changes in the economy or other conditions when it otherwise may be prudent to do so. In addition, certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including debt service obligations, real estate taxes, and operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings. Further, as a result of the 100% prohibited transactions tax applicable to REITs, we intend to hold our properties for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forgo or defer sales of properties that otherwise would be favorable. Therefore, we may be unable to adjust our portfolio promptly in response to economic, market or other conditions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
Some of our leases may not contain rental increases over time, or the rental increases may be less than the fair market rate at a future point in time. When that is the case, the value of the leased property to a potential purchaser may not increase over time, which may restrict our ability to sell that property, or if we are able to sell that property, may result in a sale price less than the price that we paid to purchase the property or the price that could be obtained if the rental was at the then-current market rate.
We expect to hold the various real properties we acquire until such time as we decide that a sale or other disposition is appropriate given our REIT status and business objectives. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms or at all depends on certain factors beyond our control, including competition from other sellers and the availability of attractive financing for potential buyers of our properties. We cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate assets which will exist at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions which may affect the disposition of our properties, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to sell such properties at a profit or at all in the future. Accordingly, the extent to which our stockholders will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate assets will depend upon fluctuating market conditions. Furthermore, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.
Our properties where the underlying tenant has a below investment grade credit rating, as determined by major credit rating agencies, or has an unrated tenant may have a greater risk of default.
As of December 31, 2020, approximately 62.0% of our tenants were not rated or did not have an investment grade credit rating from a major ratings agency or were not affiliates of companies having an investment grade credit rating. Our properties with such tenants may have a greater risk of default and bankruptcy than properties leased exclusively to investment grade tenants. When we acquire properties where the tenant does not have a publicly available credit rating, we will use certain credit assessment tools as well as rely on our own estimates of the tenant’s credit rating which includes reviewing the tenant’s financial information (e.g., financial ratios, net worth, revenue, cash flows, leverage and liquidity, if applicable). If our ratings estimates are inaccurate, the default or bankruptcy risk for the subject tenant may be greater than anticipated. If our lender or a credit rating agency disagrees with our ratings estimates, we may not be able to obtain our desired level of leverage or our financing costs may exceed those that we projected. This outcome could have an adverse impact on our returns on that asset and hence our operating results.
Increased operating expenses could reduce cash flows from operations and funds available to acquire properties or make distributions.
Our properties are subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us. If any property is not fully occupied or if rents are payable (or are being paid) in an amount that is insufficient to cover operating expenses that are the landlord’s responsibility under the lease, we could be required to expend funds in excess of such rents with respect to that property for operating expenses. Our properties are subject to increases in tax rates, utility costs, insurance costs, repairs and maintenance costs, administrative costs and other operating and ownership expenses. Some of our
33

Table of Contents

property leases may not require the tenants to pay all or a portion of these expenses, in which event we may be responsible for these costs. If we are unable to lease properties on terms that require the tenants to pay all or some of the properties’ operating expenses, if our tenants fail to pay these expenses as required or if expenses we are required to pay exceed our expectations, we could have less funds available for future acquisitions or cash available for distributions to our stockholders.
Real estate related taxes may increase, and if these increases are not passed on to tenants, our income will be reduced.
Local real property tax assessors may reassess our properties, which may result in increased taxes. Generally, property taxes increase as property values or assessment rates change, or for other reasons deemed relevant by property tax assessors. An increase in the assessed valuation of a property for real estate tax purposes will result in an increase in the related real estate taxes on that property. Although some tenant leases may permit us to pass through such tax increases to the tenants for payment, renewal leases or future leases may not be negotiated on the same basis. Tax increases not passed through to tenants could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
Covenants, conditions and restrictions may restrict our ability to operate a property.
Many of our properties are or will be subject to significant covenants, conditions and restrictions, known as “CC&Rs,” restricting their operation and any improvements on such properties. Compliance with CC&Rs may adversely affect the types of tenants we are able to attract to such properties, our operating costs and reduce the amount of funds that we have available to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Acquisitions of build-to-suit properties will be subject to additional risks related to properties under development.
We may engage in build-to-suit programs and the acquisition of properties under development. In connection with these acquisitions, we will enter into purchase and sale arrangements with sellers or developers of suitable properties under development or construction. In such cases, we are generally obligated to purchase the property at the completion of construction, provided that the construction conforms to definitive plans, specifications, and costs approved by us in advance. We may also engage in development and construction activities involving existing properties, including the expansion of existing facilities (typically at the request of a tenant) or the development or build-out of vacant space at retail properties. We may advance significant amounts in connection with certain development projects.
As a result, we are subject to potential development risks and construction delays and the resultant increased costs and risks, as well as the risk of loss of certain amounts that we have advanced should a development project not be completed. To the extent that we engage in development or construction projects, we may be subject to uncertainties associated with obtaining permits or re-zoning for development, environmental and land use concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups, and the builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs and timetables. If a developer or builder fails to perform, we may terminate the purchase, modify the construction contract or resort to legal action to compel performance (or in certain cases, we may elect to take over the project and pursue completion of the project ourselves). A developer’s or builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond that party’s control. Delays in obtaining permits or completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases.
We may incur additional risks if we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders before they complete construction. These and other such factors can result in increased project costs or the loss of our investment. Although we rarely engage in construction activities relating to space that is not already leased to one or more tenants, to the extent that we do so, we may be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also will rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of the property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If these projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property and our return on our investment could suffer. If we contract with a development company for a newly developed property, there is a risk that money advanced to that development company for the project may not be fully recoverable if the developer fails to successfully complete the project.
Our operating results may be negatively affected by potential development and construction delays and the resultant increased costs and risks.
If we engage in development or construction projects, we will be subject to uncertainties associated with re-zoning for development, environmental and land use concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups, and our builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs, and timetables. If a builder fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to rescind the breached agreements or to compel performance. A builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Delays in completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases. We may incur additional risks if we make periodic progress payments or other advances to
34

Table of Contents

builders before they complete construction. These and other such factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our asset. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and our return on our assets could suffer.
We may deploy capital in unimproved real property. Returns from development of unimproved properties are also subject to risks associated with re-zoning the land for development and environmental and land use concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups.
Competition with third parties in acquiring, leasing or selling properties and other investments may reduce our profitability and the return on our stockholders’ investment.
We compete with many other entities engaged in real estate acquisition activities, including individuals, corporations, bank and insurance company investment accounts, other REITs, real estate limited partnerships, and other entities engaged in real estate acquisition activities, many of which have greater resources than we do. Larger competitors may enjoy significant advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. In addition, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable acquisitions may increase. Any such increase would result in increased demand for these assets and therefore increased prices paid for them. If we pay higher prices for properties and other assets as a result of competition with third parties without a corresponding increase in tenant lease rates, our profitability will be reduced, and our stockholders may experience a lower return on their investment.
We are also subject to competition in the leasing of our properties. Many of our competitors own properties similar to ours in the same markets in which our properties are located. If one of our properties is nearing the end of the lease term or becomes vacant and our competitors (which could include funds sponsored by affiliates of our manager) offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose existing or potential tenants and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge or to offer substantial rent concessions in order to retain tenants when such tenants’ leases expire or to attract new tenants.
In addition, if our competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to sell in the same markets and/or at valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be unable to dispose of our assets at all or at favorable pricing or on favorable terms. As a result of these actions by our competitors, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our properties face competition that may affect tenants’ ability to pay rent and the amount of rent paid to us may affect the cash available for distributions to our stockholders and the amount of distributions.
Many of our leases provide for increases in rent as a result of increases in the tenant’s sales volume. There likely will be numerous other retail properties within the market area of such properties that will compete with our tenants for customer business. In addition, traditional retailers face increasing competition from alternative retail channels, including internet-based retailers and other forms of e-commerce, factory outlet centers, wholesale clubs, mail order catalogs and television shopping networks, which could adversely impact our retail tenants’ sales volume. Such competition could negatively affect such tenants’ ability to pay rent or the amount of rent paid to us. This could result in decreased cash flows from tenants thus affecting cash available for distributions to our stockholders and the amount of distributions we pay.
Acquiring or attempting to acquire multiple properties in a single transaction may adversely affect our operations.
From time to time, we may acquire multiple properties in a single transaction. Portfolio acquisitions are often more complex and expensive than single-property acquisitions, and the risk that a multiple-property acquisition does not close may be greater than in a single-property acquisition. Portfolio acquisitions may also result in us owning assets in geographically dispersed markets, placing additional demands on our ability to manage the properties in the portfolio. In addition, a seller may require that a group of properties be purchased as a package even though we may not want to purchase one or more properties in the portfolio. In these situations, if we are unable to identify another person or entity to acquire the unwanted properties, we will be required to either pass on the entire portfolio, including the desirable properties or acquire the entire portfolio and operate or attempt to dispose of the unwanted properties. To acquire multiple properties in a single transaction, we may be required to accumulate a large amount of cash. We would expect the returns that we earn on such cash to be less than the ultimate returns on real property, therefore accumulating such cash could reduce our funds available for distributions to our stockholders. Any of the foregoing events may have an adverse impact on our operations.
35

Table of Contents

Terrorist attacks, acts of violence or war or public health crises may affect the markets in which we operate and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
The strength and profitability of our business depends on demand for and the value of our properties. Terrorist attacks, acts of war and public health crises (including the COVID-19 outbreak) may result in declining economic activity, which could harm the demand for and the value of our properties and may negatively affect our operations and our stockholders’ investments. We may acquire real estate assets located in areas that are susceptible to terrorist attacks or acts of war. These attacks may directly impact the value of our assets through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs. Although we may obtain terrorism insurance, we may not be able to obtain sufficient coverage to fund any losses we may incur. Risks associated with potential acts of terrorism could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Further, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable or not insurable at reasonable costs.
More generally, any terrorist attack, other act of violence or war, or public health crisis (such as the COVID-19 outbreak) could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy, all of which could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to pay rent on their leases or our ability to borrow money or issue capital stock at acceptable prices, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Our business and/or operations and the businesses of our tenants could be materially and adversely affected by the risks, or the public perception of the risks, related to a pandemic or other health crisis, such as the recent outbreak of COVID-19.
The COVID-19 outbreak and the associated “shelter-in-place” or “stay-at-home” orders or other quarantine mandates or public health guidance issued by local, state or federal authorities has adversely affected a number of our tenants’ businesses. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will impact our operations and those of our tenants will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, the actions taken to contain the COVID-19 pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related containment measures. Management is evaluating rent relief requests on a case-by-case basis and not all requests for rent relief may be granted. To the extent we grant additional requests for rent relief, either in the form of rent deferral or abatement, or to the extent our tenants default on their lease obligations, it may have a negative impact on our rental revenue and net income. Management will continue to monitor the impact to our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and occupancy. Accordingly, we cannot predict the significance, extent or duration of any adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We are subject to risks that affect the retail real estate environment generally.
Our business has historically focused on retail real estate. As such, we are subject to certain risks that can affect the ability of our retail properties to generate sufficient revenue to meet our operating and other expenses, including debt service, to make capital expenditures and to make distributions to our shareholders. We face continuing challenges because of changing consumer preferences and because the conditions in the economy affect employment growth and cause fluctuations and variations in retail sales and in business and consumer confidence and consumer spending on retail goods. In general, a number of factors can negatively affect the income generated by a retail property or the value of a property, including: a downturn in the national, regional or local economy; a decrease in employment or consumer confidence or spending; increases in operating costs, such as common area maintenance, real estate taxes, utility rates and insurance premiums; higher energy or fuel costs resulting from adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, geopolitical concerns, terrorist activities and other factors; changes in interest rate levels and the cost and availability of financing; a weakening of local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of, or a reduction in demand for, retail space or retail goods, and the availability and creditworthiness of current and prospective tenants; trends in the retail industry; seasonality; changes in perceptions by retailers or shoppers of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of a retail property; perceived changes in the convenience and quality of competing retail properties and other retailing options such as internet shopping or other strategies, such as using smartphones or other technologies to determine where to make and to assist in making purchases; the ability of our tenants to meet shoppers’ demands for quality, variety, and product availability, which may be impacted by supply chain disruptions; and changes in laws and regulations applicable to real property, including tax and zoning laws.
Changes in one or more of the aforementioned factors can lead to a decrease in the revenue or income generated by our properties and can have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Many of these factors could also specifically or disproportionately affect one or more of our tenants, which could decrease operating performance, reduce property revenue and affect our results of operations. If the estimated future cash flows related to a particular property are significantly reduced, we may be required to reduce the carrying value of the property.
36

Table of Contents

Downturns in the retail industry likely will have a direct adverse impact on our revenues and cash flow.
Our retail properties currently owned consist primarily of necessity retail properties and anchored shopping centers. Our retail performance therefore is generally linked to economic conditions in the market for retail space. The market for retail space could be adversely affected by any of the following:
weakness in the national, regional and local economies, and declines in consumer confidence which could adversely impact consumer spending and retail sales and in turn tenant demand for space and could lead to increased store closings;
changes in market rental rates;
changes in demographics (including the number of households and average household income) surrounding our shopping centers;
adverse financial conditions for anchored shopping centers and other retail, service, medical or restaurant tenants;
continued consolidation in the retail and grocery sector;
excess amount of retail space in our markets;
reduction in the demand by tenants to occupy our shopping centers as a result of reduced consumer demand for certain retail formats;
increase in e-commerce and alternative distribution channels may negatively affect out tenant sales or decrease the square footage our tenants require and could lead to margin pressure on our anchored shopping centers, which could lead to store closures;
the impact of an increase in energy costs on consumers and its consequential effect on the number of shopping visits to our centers;
a pandemic or other health crisis, such as the outbreak of COVID-19; and
consequences of any armed conflict involving, or terrorist attack against, the United States.
To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to impact market rents for retail space, occupancy in our retail properties, our ability to sell, acquire or develop retail properties, and our cash available for distributions to stockholders.
If we sell properties by providing financing to purchasers, defaults by the purchasers would adversely affect our cash flows from operations.
In some instances, we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default on its obligations under the financing, which could negatively impact cash flows from operations. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of sale proceeds or their reinvestment in other assets will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon the sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of. In some cases, we may receive initial down payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price, and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. If any purchaser defaults under a financing arrangement with us, it could negatively impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
Our net leases may require us to pay property-related expenses that are not the obligations of our tenants.
Under the terms of the majority of our net leases, in addition to satisfying their rent obligations, our tenants will be responsible for the payment or reimbursement of property expenses such as real estate taxes, insurance and ordinary maintenance and repairs. However, under the provisions of certain existing leases and leases that we may enter into in the future with our tenants, we may be required to pay some or all of the expenses of the property, such as the costs of environmental liabilities, roof and structural repairs, real estate taxes, insurance, certain non-structural repairs and maintenance. If our properties incur significant expenses that must be paid by us under the terms of our leases, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected and the amount of cash available to meet expenses and to pay distributions to stockholders may be reduced.
Changes in accounting standards may adversely impact our financial condition and/or results of operations.
We are subject to the rules and regulations of the Financial Accounting Standards Board related to GAAP. Various changes to GAAP are constantly being considered, some of which could materially impact our reported financial condition and/or results of operations. Also, to the extent that public companies in the United States would be required in the future to prepare
37

Table of Contents

financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards instead of the current GAAP, this change in accounting standards could materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, and fire, safety and other regulations may require us to make unanticipated expenditures that could significantly reduce the cash available for distributions on our common stock.
Our properties are subject to regulation under federal laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (the “ADA”), pursuant to which all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Although we believe that our properties substantially comply with present requirements of the ADA, we have not conducted an audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine our compliance. If one or more of our properties or future properties are not in compliance with the ADA, we might be required to take remedial action, which would require us to incur additional costs to bring the property into compliance. Noncompliance with the ADA could also result in imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants.
Additional federal, state and local laws also may require modifications to our properties or restrict our ability to renovate our properties. We cannot predict the ultimate amount of the cost of compliance with the ADA or other legislation.
In addition, our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local earthquake, fire and life safety requirements. If we were to fail to comply with these various requirements, we might incur governmental fines or private damage awards. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA or any other regulatory requirements, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock could be materially adversely affected. Local regulations, including municipal or local ordinances, zoning restrictions and restrictive covenants imposed by community developers may restrict our use of our properties and may require us to obtain approval from local officials or community standards organizations at any time with respect to our properties, including prior to acquiring a property or when undertaking renovations of any of our existing properties.
Risks Related to the Mergers
The market value ascribed to the shares of common stock of the other parties to the Mergers upon a liquidity event may be significantly lower than the estimated per share NAV of our common stock considered by our Board in approving and recommending the Mergers.
In approving and recommending the Mergers, our Board considered, among other things, the most recent estimated per share NAV of our common stock and the common stock of the other parties to the Mergers as determined by our Board and the other parties’ respective boards of directors, with the assistance of their respective third-party valuation experts. The estimated per share NAV of our common stock has not been determined following the consummation of the Mergers. In the event that we complete a liquidity event now that the Mergers have closed, such as a listing of our shares on a national securities exchange, a merger in which our stockholders receive securities that are listed on a national securities exchange, or a sale of our company for cash, the market value of our shares upon consummation of such liquidity event may be significantly lower than the estimated value considered by our Board and the estimated per share NAV of the common stock of CCIT III or CCPT V that may be reflected on the account statements of our stockholders. For example, if our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, the trading price of the shares may be significantly lower than the most recent estimated per share NAV of our common stock of $7.31 as of June 30, 2020.
Risks Associated with Debt Financing
We have incurred mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, hinder our ability to make distributions, and decrease the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We have acquired real estate and other real estate-related assets by borrowing new funds. In addition, we have incurred mortgage debt and pledged some of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional real properties and other investmentsassets and to pay distributions to our stockholders. We may borrow additional funds if we need funds to satisfy the REIT tax qualification requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to our stockholders. We may also borrow additional funds if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to assure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Our advisormanager believes that utilizing borrowing is consistent with our investment objective of maximizing the return to stockholders. There is no limitation on the amount we may borrow against any individual property or other investment. However, under our charter, we are required to limit our borrowings to 75% of the cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) of our gross assets, unless excess borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly report along with a justification for such excess borrowing. Moreover, our board of directors has adopted a policy to further limit our borrowings to 60% of the greater of cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) or fair market value of our gross assets, unless such excess borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in the next quarterly report along with a justification for such excess borrowing. Our borrowings will not exceed 300% of our net assets as of the date of any borrowing, which is the maximum level of indebtedness permitted under the NASAA REIT Guidelines and our charter; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly report, along

asset. This factor
40
38

Table of Contents



with a justification for such excess borrowing. These factors could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute to our stockholders and could result in a decline in the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We do not intend to incur mortgage debt on a particular property unless we believe the property’s projected operating cash flows are sufficient to service the mortgage debt. However, if there is a shortfall between the cash flowflows from a property and the cash flowflows needed to service mortgage debt on a property, the amount available for distributions to our stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of our stockholders’ investments. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds from the foreclosure. In such event, we may be unable to pay the amount of distributions required in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of recourse mortgage debt to the entities that own our properties. If we provide a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity and with respect to any such property that is vacant, potentially be responsible for any property-related costs such as real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance, which costs will likely increase if the lender does not timely exercise its remedies. If any mortgages contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected, which could result in our losing our REIT status and would result in a decrease in the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We intend to rely on external sources of capital to fund future capital needs, and if we encounter difficulty in obtaining such capital, we may not be able to meet maturing obligations or make any additional acquisitions.
In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we are required, among other things, to distribute annually to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. Because of this dividend requirement, we may not be able to fund from cash retained from operations all of our future capital needs, including capital needed to refinance maturing obligations or make new acquisitions.
The capital and credit markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruption in recent years.as a result of the global outbreak of COVID-19. We believe that such volatility and disruption are likely to continue into the foreseeable future. Market volatility and disruption could hinder our ability to obtain new debt financing or refinance our maturing debt on favorable terms or at all or to raise debt and equity capital. Our access to capital will depend upon a number of factors, including:
general market conditions;
government action or regulation, including changes in tax law;
the market’s perception of our future growth potential;
the extent of investor interest;
analyst reports about us and the REIT industry;
the general reputation of REITs and the attractiveness of their equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate-based companies;
our financial performance and that of our tenants;
our current debt levels and changes in our credit ratings, if any;
our current and expected future earnings; and
our cash flowflows and cash distributions, including our ability to satisfy the dividend requirements applicable to REITs.
If we are unable to obtain needed capital on satisfactory terms or at all, we may not be able to meet our obligations and commitments as they mature or make any new acquisitions.
High interest rates may make it difficult for us to finance or refinance assets, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of cash distributions we can make.
We run the risk of being unable to finance or refinance our assets on favorable terms or at all. If interest rates are high when we desire to mortgage our assets or when existing loans come due and the assets need to be refinanced, we may not be able to, or may choose not to, finance the assets and we would be required to use cash to purchase or repay outstanding obligations. Our inability to use debt to finance or refinance our assets could reduce the number of assets we can acquire, which could reduce

41
39

Table of Contents



could reduce our operating cash flows and the amount of cash distributions we can make to our stockholders. Higher costs of capital also could negatively impact our operating cash flowflows and returns on our assets.
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
We have incurred indebtedness, and in the future may incur additional indebtedness, that bears interest at a variable rate. To the extent that we incur variable rate debt and do not hedge our exposure thereunder, increases in interest rates would increase the amounts payable under such indebtedness, which could reduce our operating cash flows and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. In addition, if our existing indebtedness matures or otherwise becomes payable during a period of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our assets at times that may prevent realization of the maximum return on such assets.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flowflows to meet our debt service obligations.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, and to fund our operations, working capital and capital expenditures, depends on our ability to generate cash. To a certain extent, our cash flow isflows are subject to general economic, industry, financial, competitive, operating, legislative, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
We cannot assure our stockholders that our business will generate sufficient cash flowflows from operations or that future sources of cash will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay amounts due on our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Additionally, if we incur additional indebtedness in connection with any future deployment of capital or development projects or for any other purpose, our debt service obligations could increase. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness or obtain additional financing will depend on, among other things:
our financial condition and market conditions at the time;
restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness;
general economic and capital market conditions;
the availability of credit from banks or other lenders; and
our results of operations.


As a result, we may not be able to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we do not generate sufficient cash flowflows from operations, and additional borrowings or refinancings or proceeds of asset sales or other sources of cash are not available to us, we may not have sufficient cash to enable us to meet all of our obligations. Accordingly, if we cannot service our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as seeking additional equity, or delaying any strategic acquisitions and alliances or capital expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flowflows or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
In connection with providing us financing, a lender could impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. In general, our loan agreements restrict our ability to encumber or otherwise transfer our interest in the respective property without the prior consent of the lender. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance coverage or replace CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management as our advisor.manager. These or other limitations imposed by a lender may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to pay distributions on our common stock.
Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default and ultimately may reduce our funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
We have financed some of our property acquisitions using interest-only mortgage indebtedness and may continue to do so. During the interest-only period, the amount of each scheduled payment will be less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan will not be reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal during this period. After the interest-only period, we will be required either to make scheduled payments of amortized principal and interest or to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at
40

Table of Contents

maturity. These required principal or balloon payments will increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase

42

Table of Contents


our risk of default under the related mortgage loan. If the mortgage loan has an adjustable interest rate, the amount of our scheduled payments also may increase at a time of rising interest rates. Increased payments and substantial principal or balloon maturity payments will reduce the funds available for distribution to our stockholders because cash otherwise available for distribution will be required to pay principal and interest associated with these mortgage loans.
Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or our ability to sell the property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the loan on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. The effect of a refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to stockholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debts may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Any of these results would have a significant, negative impact on the value of our common stock.
To hedge against exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, we have used, and may continue to use, derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective and may reduce the overall returns on our stockholders’ investment.
We have used, and may continue to use, derivative financial instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in exchange rates and interest rates on loans secured by our assets and investments in CMBS. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate caps or floor contracts, rate lock arrangements, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from time to time.
To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to credit risk, market risk, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Market risk includes the adverse effect on the value of the financial instrument resulting from a change in interest rates. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.
Changes in banks’ inter-bank lending rate reporting practices or the method pursuant to which the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) is determined may adversely affect the value of the financial obligations to be held or issued by us that are linked to LIBOR.
LIBOR and other indices which are deemed “benchmarks” are the subject of recent national, international, and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. Some of these reforms are already effective while others are still to be implemented. These reforms may cause such benchmarks to perform differently than in the past, or have other consequences which cannot be predicted. It currently appears that, over time, U.S. Dollar LIBOR may be replaced by the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. However, the manner and timing of this shift is currently unknown. Market participants are still considering how various types of financial instruments and securitization vehicles would react to a discontinuation of LIBOR. It is possible that not all of our assets and liabilities will transition away from LIBOR at the same time, and it is possible that not all of our assets and liabilities will transition to the same alternative reference rate, in each case increasing the difficulty of hedging. For example, switching existing financial instruments and hedging transactions from LIBOR to SOFR requires calculations of a spread. Industry organizations are attempting to structure the spread calculation in a manner that minimizes the possibility of value transfer between counterparties, borrowers, and lenders by virtue of the transition, but there is no assurance that the calculated spread will be fair and accurate or that all asset types and all types of securitization vehicles will use the same spread. The Company and other market participants have less experience understanding and modeling SOFR-based assets and liabilities than LIBOR-based assets and liabilities, increasing the difficulty of investing, hedging, and risk management. The process of transition involves operational risks. It is also possible that no transition will occur for many financial instruments. At this time, it is not possible to predict the effect of any such changes, any establishment of alternative reference rates or any other reforms to LIBOR that may be implemented. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes, alternative reference rates or other reforms may adversely affect the market for or value of any securities on which the interest or dividend is determined by reference to LIBOR, loans, derivatives and other financial obligations or on our overall financial condition or results of operations. More generally, any of the above changes or any other consequential changes to LIBOR or any other “benchmark” as a result of international, national or other proposals for reform or other initiatives, or any further uncertainty in relation to the timing and manner of implementation of such changes, could have a material adverse effect on the value of and return on any securities based on or linked to a “benchmark.”
41

Table of Contents

Risks Associated with Real Estate-Related Assets
Investing in mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans could adversely affect our return on our loan investments.
We have invested, and may continue to invest, in mezzanine loans and may make or acquire mortgage bridge or mezzaninebridge loans, or participations in such loans, to the extent our advisormanager determines that it is advantageous for us to do so. However, if we make or invest in mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans, we will be at risk of defaults on those loans caused by many conditions beyond our control, including local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values and interest rate levels. If there are defaults under these loans, we may not be able to repossess and sell quickly any properties securing such loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of any lawsuit brought in connection with the foreclosure if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the loan, which could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted loan.
We are subject to risks relating to real estate-related securities, including CMBS.
Real estate-related securities are often unsecured and also may be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result, investments in real estate-related securities may be subject to risks of (1) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market in the case of unlisted or thinly traded securities, (2) substantial market price volatility resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates in the case of traded equity securities, (3) subordination to the prior claims of banks and other senior lenders to the issuer, (4) the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets, (5) the possibility that earnings of the issuer or that income from collateral may be insufficient to meet debt service and distribution obligations and (6) the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic slowdown or downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding real estate-related securities and the ability of the obliged parties to repay principal and interest or make distribution payments.
CMBS are securities that evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Accordingly, these securities are subject to the risks above and all of the risks of the underlying

43

Table of Contents


mortgage loans. CMBS are issued by investment banks and non-regulated financial institutions, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government. The value of CMBS may change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities market as a whole and may be negatively impacted by any dislocation in the mortgage-backed securities market in general.
CMBS are also subject to several risks created through the securitization process. Subordinate CMBS are paid interest only to the extent that there are funds available to make payments. To the extent the collateral pool includes delinquent loans, there is a risk that interest payments on subordinate CMBS will not be fully paid. Subordinate CMBS are also subject to greater credit risk than those CMBS that are more highly rated. In certain instances, third-party guarantees or other forms of credit support can reduce the credit risk.
U.S. Federal Income and Other Tax Risks
Failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes would adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions.
We are currently taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. Our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet requirements regarding our organization and ownership, distributions of our income, the nature and diversification of our income and assets and other tests imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Future legislative, judicial or administrative changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws could be applied retroactively, which could result in our disqualification as a REIT. If we fail to continue to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investmentthe acquisition of assets or distribution to our stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to our stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. If we lose our REIT status, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investmentsassets in order to pay the applicable tax. Our failure to continue to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the return on our stockholders’ investment.
42

Table of Contents

Certain of our business activities are potentially subject to the prohibited transaction tax, which could reduce the return on our stockholders’ investment.
Our ability to dispose of a property during the first few years following its acquisition is restricted to a substantial extent as a result of our REIT status. Whether property is inventory or otherwise held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding each property. Properties we own, directly or through any subsidiary entity, including CMFT OP, but generally excluding our taxable REIT subsidiaries, may, depending on how we conduct our operations, be treated as inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Under applicable provisions of the Code regarding prohibited transactions by REITs, we would be subject to a 100% tax on any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of any property (other than foreclosure property) that we own, directly or through any subsidiary entity, including CMFT OP, but generally excluding our taxable REIT subsidiaries, that is deemed to be inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of trade or business. Any taxes we pay would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders. Our concern over paying the prohibited transactions tax may cause us to forgo disposition opportunities that would otherwise be advantageous if we were not a REIT. As of December 31, 2020, our dispositions were not subject to the prohibited transaction tax.
Re-characterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.
We may purchase properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. We would characterize such a sale-leaseback transaction as a “true lease,” which treats the lessor as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the event that any sale-leaseback transaction is challenged by the IRS and re-characterized as a financing transaction or loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so re-characterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification “asset tests” or the “income tests” and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of re-characterization. Alternatively, such a re-characterization could cause the amount of our REIT taxable income to be recalculated, which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement for a taxable year and thus lose our REIT status.
Our stockholders may have current tax liability on distributions they elect to reinvest in our common stock.
If our stockholders participate in our DRIP, they will be deemed to have received, and for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in shares of our common stock that does not represent a return of capital. In addition, our stockholders may be treated, for U.S. federal tax purposes, as having received an additional distribution to the extent the shares are purchased at a discount from fair market value. Such an additional deemed distribution could cause our stockholders to be subject to additional income tax liability. Unless our stockholders are a tax-exempt entity, they may have to use funds from other sources to pay their tax liability arising as a result of the distributions reinvested in our shares.
Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
Income from “qualified dividends” payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates are generally subject to tax at preferential rates. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income.income (but under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates generally may deduct up to 20% of ordinary dividends from a REIT for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026). Although these rules do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, to the extent that the preferential rates continue to apply to regular corporate qualified dividends, investors who are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including the per share trading price of our securities. However, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, non-corporate U.S. stockholders of REITs are entitled to a deduction equal to 20% of any “qualified REIT dividends.” A qualified REIT dividend is defined as any dividend from a REIT that is not a capital gain dividend or a dividend attributable to dividend income from U.S.

44

Table of Contents


corporations or certain non-U.S. corporations. A non-corporate U.S. stockholder’s ability to claim a deduction equal to 20% of qualified REIT dividends received may be limited by the stockholder’s particular circumstances.REITs.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability or reduce our operating flexibility, including the recently passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.flexibility.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure our stockholders that any such changes will not adversely affect our taxation and our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT, or the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. Our stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on their investment in our shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares. Although REITs generally receive better tax treatment than entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that acquires real estate to elect to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a regular corporation. As a result, our charter provides our board of directorsBoard with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, without the vote of our stockholders. Our board of directorsBoard has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only
43

Table of Contents

cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interestsinterest of our stockholders.
In addition, on December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act makesmade significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax rules for taxation of individuals and businesses, generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act makes major changes to the Code,2017, including a number of provisions of the Code that affect the taxation of REITs and their stockholders. Among the changes made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are permanently reducing the generally applicable corporate tax rate, generally reducing the tax rate applicable to individuals and other noncorporate taxpayers for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, eliminating or modifying certain previously allowed deductions (including substantially limiting interest deductibility and, for individuals, the deduction for non-business state and local taxes), and, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, providing for preferential rates of taxation through a deduction of up to 20% (subject to certain limitations) on most ordinary REIT dividends and certain trade or business income of non-corporate taxpayers. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also imposes new limitations on the deduction of net operating losses and requires us to recognize income for tax purposes no later than when we take it into account on our financial statements, which may result in us having to make additional taxable distributions to our stockholders in order to comply with REIT distribution requirements or avoid taxes on retained income and gains. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also makesmade numerous large and small changes to the tax rules that do not affect the REIT qualification rules directly but may otherwise affect us or our stockholders.
While the changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act generally appear to be favorable with respect to REITs, the extensive changes to non-REIT provisions in the Internal Revenue Code may have unanticipated effects on us or our stockholders. Moreover, Congressional leaders have recognized that the process of adopting extensive tax legislation in a short amount of time without hearings and substantial time for review is likely to have led to drafting errors, issues needing clarification and unintended consequences that will have to be revisited in subsequent tax legislation. At this point, it is not clear if or when Congress will address these issues or when the IRS will issue administrative guidance on the changes made in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
We urge our stockholders to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the status of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and other legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on holding our common stock.
In certain circumstances, we may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Even if we maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes. For example, net income from the sale of properties that are “dealer” properties sold by a REIT (a “prohibited transaction” under the Internal Revenue Code) will be subject to a 100% excise tax. Additionally, if we are not able to make sufficient distributions to eliminate our REIT taxable income, we may be subject to tax as a corporation on our undistributed REIT taxable income. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the

45

Table of Contents


level of our operating partnership or at the level of the other entities through which we indirectly own our assets. Any federal, state or local taxes we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
If our operating partnership or certain other subsidiaries fail to maintain their status as disregarded entities or partnerships, their income may be subject to taxation, which would reduce the cash available to us for distribution to our stockholders.
We intend to cause CCPT IVCMFT OP, our operating partnership, to maintain its current status as an entity separate from us (a disregarded entity), or in the alternative, a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our operating partnership would lose its status as a disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes if it issues interests to any subsidiary we establish that is not a disregarded entity for tax purposes (a “regarded entity”) or a person other than us. If our operating partnership issues interests to any subsidiary we establish that is a regarded entity for tax purposes or a person other than us, we would characterize our operating partnership as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a disregarded entity or partnership, our operating partnership is not subject to U.S. federal income tax on its income. However, if the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of our operating partnership as a disregarded entity or partnership, CCPT IVCMFT OP would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that the operating partnership could make to us. This could also result in our losing REIT status, and becoming subject to a corporate-level tax on our income. This would substantially reduce the cash available to us to make distributions to our stockholders and the return on their investment.
In addition, if certain of our other subsidiaries through which CCPT IVCMFT OP owns its properties, in whole or in part, lose their status as disregarded entities or partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such subsidiaries would be subject to taxation as corporations, thereby reducing cash available for distributions to our operating partnership. Such a re-characterization of CCPT IVCMFT OP’s subsidiaries also could threaten our ability to maintain REIT status.
44

Table of Contents

To maintain our qualification as a REIT we must meet annual distribution requirements, which may force us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities or borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions. This could delay or hinder our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce our stockholders’ overall return.
In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must distribute annually to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which dividends we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (a) 85% of our ordinary income, (b) 95% of our capital gain net income and (c) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years.
Further, to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must ensure that we meet the REIT gross income tests annually and that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and certain kinds of mortgage-related securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and stock of a TRS)taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”)) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities, qualified real estate assets and stock of a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets can be represented by certain debt securities of publicly offered REITs. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate assets from our portfolio or not make otherwise attractive investments in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.
The foregoing requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on real estate assets and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds, possibly at unfavorable rates, or sell assets to fund these dividends or make taxable stock dividends. Although we intend to make distributions sufficient to meet the annual distribution requirements and to avoid U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our earnings, it is possible that we might not always be able to do so.
Our mezzanine loans may not qualify as real estate assets and could adversely affect our status as a REIT.
We have invested and may continue to invest in mezzanine loans, for which the IRS has provided a safe harbor, but not rules of substantive law. Pursuant to the safe harbor, if a mezzanine loan meets certain requirements, the IRS will treat the mezzanine loan as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% income test. To the extent that any mezzanine loans do not meet all of the requirements for reliance on the safe harbor, such loans may not be real estate assets and could adversely affect our qualification as a REIT.
Non-U.S. stockholders may be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax and may be subject to U.S. federal income tax upon the disposition of our shares.
Gain recognized by a non-U.S. stockholder upon the sale or exchange of our common stock generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation unless such stock constitutes a “U.S. real property interest” (“USRPI”) under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“FIRPTA”). Our common stock will not constitute a USRPI so long as we are a “domestically-controlled qualified investment entity.” A domestically-controlled qualified investment entity includes a REIT if

46

Table of Contents


at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of such REIT’s stock is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. stockholders. We believe that we are a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity. However, because our common stock is and will be freely transferable, no assurance can be given that we are or will be a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity.
Even if we do not qualify as a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity at the time a non-U.S. stockholder sells or exchanges our common stock, gain arising from such a sale or exchange would not be subject to U.S. taxation under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI if: (a) our common stock is “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable Treasury regulations,Regulations, on an established securities market, and (b) such non-U.S. stockholder owned, actually or constructively, 10% or less of our common stock at any time during the five-year period ending on the date of the sale.
45

Table of Contents

Distributions to tax-exempt stockholders may be classified as unrelated business taxable income.
If (1) we are a “pension-held REIT,” (2) a tax-exempt stockholder has incurred (or is deemed to have incurred) debt to purchase or hold shares of our common stock or (3) a holder of shares of our common stock is a certain type of tax-exempt stockholder, dividends on, and gains recognized on the sale of, shares by such tax-exempt stockholder may be subject to U.S. federal income tax as UBTI under the Code.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to hedge our liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets or to offset certain other positions, if properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of one or both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”).TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our TRSs would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in a TRS generally will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income of such TRS.
Our property taxes could increase due to property tax rate changes or reassessment, which would impact our cash flows.
Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay some state and local taxes on our properties. The real property taxes on our properties may increase as property tax rates change or as our properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Therefore, the amount of property taxes we pay in the future may increase substantially. If the property taxes we pay increase and if any such increase is not reimbursable under the terms of our lease, then our cash flows will be negatively impacted, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flowflows or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations or to maintain our level of distributions on our common stock.
The share transfer and ownership restrictions applicable to REITs and contained in our charter may inhibit market activity in our shares of stock and restrict our business combination opportunities.
In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, may not own, actually or constructively, more than 50% in value of our issued and outstanding shares of stock at any time during the last half of each taxable year, other than the first year for which a REIT election is made. Attribution rules in the Internal Revenue Code determine if any individual or entity actually or constructively owns our shares of stock under this requirement. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our shares of stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year for each taxable year, other than the first year for which a REIT election is made. To help ensure that we meet these tests, among other purposes, our charter restricts the acquisition and ownership of our shares of stock.
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by the board of directors,our Board, for so long as we continue to qualify as a REIT, our charter prohibits, among other limitations on ownership and transfer of shares of our stock, any person from beneficially or constructively owning (applying certain attribution rules under the Internal Revenue Code) more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of stock and more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of any class or series of our shares of stock. The board of directors,Board, in its sole discretion and upon receipt of certain representations and undertakings, may exempt a person (prospectively or retrospectively) from the ownership limits. However, the board of directorsour Board may not, among other limitations, grant an exemption from these ownership restrictions to any proposed transferee whose ownership, direct or indirect, in excess of the 9.8% ownership limit would result in the termination of our qualification as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply, however, if the board of directorsour Board determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance with the restrictions is no longer required in order for us to continue to so qualify as a REIT.

47

Table of Contents


These ownership limits could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.
46

Table of Contents

If we elect to treat one or more of our subsidiaries as a TRS, it will be subject to corporate-level taxes, and our dealings with our TRSs may be subject to a 100% excise tax.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A TRS will be subject to applicable U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income tax on its taxable income, including corporate income tax on the TRS’s income, and is, as a result, less tax efficient than with respect to income we earn directly. The after-tax net income of our TRSs would be available for distribution to us. A TRS may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT, including gross income from operations pursuant to management contracts. In addition, the rules, which are applicable to us as a REIT, as described in the preceding risk factors, also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. For example, to the extent that the rent paid by one of our TRSs exceeds an arm’s-length rental amount, such amount would be potentially subject to a 100% excise tax. While we intend that all transactions between us and our TRSs would be conducted on an arm’s-length basis, and therefore, any amounts paid by our TRSs to us would not be subject to the excise tax, no assurance can be given that the IRS would not disagree with such conclusion and levy an excise tax on such transactions.
For qualified accounts, ifIf a stockholder that is an investmentemployee benefit plan, individual retirement account (“IRA”), annuity described in our common stock constitutes a prohibited transaction underSections 403(a) or (b) of the Code, Archer Medical Savings Account, health savings account, Coverdell education savings account, or other arrangement that is subject to the Employee Retirement Income SecuritySecurities Act (“ERISA”) or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code it is possible that(referred to generally as “Benefit Plans and IRAs”) fails to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA or the Code as a result of an investment in shares of our stockholders maycommon stock, such stockholder could be subject to civil and criminal, if the impositionfailure is willful, penalties.
There are special considerations that apply to Benefit Plans and IRAs investing in shares of significant excise taxes and penalties with respect to the amount invested. In order to avoid triggering additional taxes and/or penalties, if our stockholders intend to invest in our shares through pension or profit-sharing trusts or IRAs, they should consider additional factors.
If our stockholders are investing the assets of a pension, profit-sharing, 401(k), Keogh or other qualified retirement plan or the assets of an IRA in our common stock, our stockholdersstock. Stockholders that are Benefit Plans and IRAs should satisfy themselves that, among other things:consider:
whether their investment is consistent with their fiduciary obligations underthe applicable provisions of ERISA and the Internal RevenueCode, or any other applicable governing authority in the case of a plan not subject to ERISA or the Code;
whether their investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing their planthe Benefit Plan or IRA, including their plan’sany investment policy;
whether their investment satisfies the prudence, diversification and diversificationother requirements of Sections 404(a)(1)(B) and 404(a)(1)(C) of ERISA andor any similar rule under other applicable provisions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code;laws or regulations;
whether their investment will not impair the liquidity needs, to satisfythe minimum and other distribution requirements, ofor the plan or IRA and thetax withholding requirements that may be applicable;applicable to such Benefit Plan or IRA;
whether their investment will not produce unrelated business taxable income for the plan or IRA;
they will be able to value the assets of the plan annually in accordance with ERISA requirements and applicable provisions of the plan or IRA; and
their investment will not constitute a prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal RevenueCode or any similar rule under other applicable laws or regulations;
whether their investment will produce or result in unrelated business taxable income, as defined in Sections 511 through 514 of the Code, to the Benefit Plan or IRA;
whether their investment will impair the Benefit Plan’s or IRA’s need to value its assets annually (or more frequently) in accordance with ERISA, the Code and the applicable provisions of the Benefit Plan or IRA; and
whether their investment will cause our assets to be treated as “plan assets” of the Benefit Plan or IRA.
Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA, the Code, or other applicable statutory or common law may result in the imposition of civil and criminal (if the violation is willful) penalties, and can subject the fiduciary to equitable remedies. In addition, if an investment in our common stock constitutes a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Code, the “party-in-interest” (within the meaning of ERISA) or “disqualified person” (within the meaning of the Code) who authorized or directed the investment may have to compensate the plan for any losses the plan suffered as a result of the transaction or restore to the plan any profits made by such person as a result of the transaction, or may be subject to excise taxes with respect to the amount involved. In the case of a prohibited transaction involving an IRA, the IRA may be disqualified and all of the assets of the IRA may be deemed distributed and subject to tax.
In addition to considering their fiduciary responsibilities under ERISA and the prohibited transaction rules of ERISA and the Code, stockholders that are Benefit Plans and IRAs should consider the effect of the plan assets regulation, U.S. Department of Labor Regulation Section 2510.3-101, as modified by ERISA Section 3(42). To avoid our assets from being considered “plan assets” under the plan assets regulation, our Charter prohibits “benefit plan investors” from owning 25% or more of the shares of our common stock prior to the time that the common stock qualifies as a class of publicly-offered securities, within the meaning of the plan assets regulation. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that those provisions in our Charter will be effective in limiting benefit plan investors’ ownership to less than the 25% limit. For example, the limit
47

Table of Contents

could be unintentionally exceeded if a benefit plan investor misrepresents its status as a benefit plan investor. If our underlying assets were to be considered “plan assets” of a benefit plan investor subject to ERISA, (i) we would be an ERISA fiduciary and subject to certain fiduciary requirements of ERISA with which it would be difficult for us to comply and (ii) we could be restricted from entering into favorable transactions if the transaction, absent an exemption, would constitute a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Code. Even if our assets are not considered to be “plan assets,” a prohibited transaction could occur if we or any of our affiliates is a fiduciary (within the meaning of ERISA) of a Benefit Plan or IRA stockholder.
Due to the complexity of these rules and the potential penalties that may be imposed, it is important that stockholders that are Benefit Plans and IRAs consult with their own advisors regarding the potential applicability of ERISA, the Code and any similar applicable law.
Specific rules apply to foreign, governmental and church plans.
As a general rule, certain employee benefit plans, including foreign pension plans, governmental plans established or maintained in the United States (as defined in Section 3(32) of ERISA), and certain church plans (as defined in Section 3(33) of ERISA), are not subject to ERISA’s requirements and are not “benefit plan investors” within the meaningfor purposes of the plan asset regulations of the U.S. Department of Labor.investing in “plan assets” subject to ERISA’s requirements. Any such plan that is qualified and exempt from taxation under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code may nonetheless be subject to the prohibited transaction rules set forth in Section 503 of the Internal Revenue Code and, under certain circumstances in the case of church plans, Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. Also, some foreign plans and governmental plans may be subject to foreign, state, or local laws which are, to a material extent, similar to the provisions of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. Each fiduciary of a plan subject to any such similar law should make its own determination as to the need for, and the availability of, any exemption relief.
If stockholders invest in our common stock through an IRA or other retirement plan, they may be limited in their ability to withdraw required minimum distributions.
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
If stockholders invest in our common stock with assets of a retirement plan or IRA, federal law may require them to withdraw required minimum distributions from such plan or account in the future. Our common stock will be highly illiquid, and our share redemption program only offers limited liquidity. If stockholders require liquidity, they may generally sell their shares, but such sale may be at a price less than the price at which they initially purchased their common stock. If stockholders fail to withdraw required minimum distributions from their plan or account, they may be subject to certain taxes and tax penalties.
Our investments in construction loans require us to make estimates about the fair value of land improvements that may be challenged by the IRS.
We have invested, and may continue to invest in construction loans, the interest from which is qualifying income for purposes of the REIT income tests, provided that the loan value of the real property securing the construction loan is equal to or greater than the highest outstanding principal amount of the construction loan during any taxable year. For purposes of construction loans, the loan value of the real property is the fair value of the land plus the reasonably estimated cost of the improvements or developments (other than personal property) that secure the loan and that are to be constructed from the proceeds of the loan. There can be no assurance that the IRS would not challenge our estimate of the loan value of the real property.
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

48ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

Table of Contents


ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Portfolio Information for a discussion of the properties we hold for rental operations and Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules — Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a detailed listing of such properties.
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to litigation or claims. We are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, to which we are a party or to which our properties are the subject.
48
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

49




ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
49

Table of Contents

PART II
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
As of March 26, 2018,22, 2021, we had approximately 311.5362.0 million shares of common stock outstanding, held by a total of 59,82267,223 stockholders of record. The number of stockholders is based on the records of DST Systems, Inc., which serves as our registrar and transfer agent.
There is no established trading market for our common stock. Therefore, there is a risk that a stockholder may not be able to sell our stock at a time or price acceptable to the stockholder, or at all. Unless and until our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, we do not expect that a public market for the shares will develop. Pursuant to the DRIP portion of the Offering, and the Initial DRIP Offering until September 30, 2015,Offerings, we issuedissue shares of our common stock at a price of $9.50 per share. Pursuant to the Initial DRIP Offering, beginning October 1, 2015, we issued shares of our common stock at a price of $9.70 per share, themost recently disclosed estimated per share NAV as determined by our Board. As of December 31, 2020, the board of directors as of August 31, 2015. Pursuant to the Secondary DRIP Offering, we issued shares of our common stock at a price of $9.70 per share until November 13, 2016, issued shares of our common stock at a price of $9.92 per share from November 14, 2016 until March 27, 2017, which is themost recent estimated per share NAV of our shares as determined by our board of directors as of September 30, 2016, and issued shares of our common stock at a price of $10.08was $7.31 per share, from March 28, 2017 to March 28, 2018, which is the estimated per share NAVwas established on August 14, 2020 using a valuation date of our shares as determined by our board of directors as of December 31, 2016. On March 29, 2018, our board of directors established an updated estimated per share NAV of our common stock as of December 31, 2017 of $9.37 per share. Effective March 29, 2018, we will issue shares of our common stock at a price of $9.37 per share pursuant to the Secondary DRIP Offering.June 30, 2020.
To assist fiduciaries of tax-qualified pension, stock bonus or profit-sharing plans, employee benefit plans and annuities described in Section 403(a) or (b) of the Internal Revenue Code or an individual retirement account or annuity described in Section 408 of the Internal Revenue Code subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA and IRA trustees or custodians in preparation of reports relating to an investment in the shares, we will publicly disclose and provide reports, as requested, of the per share estimated value of our common stock to those fiduciaries who request such reports. Furthermore, in order for FINRA members and their associated persons to participate in the Offering, we are required pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110 to disclose in each annual report distributed to stockholders a per share estimated value of the shares, the method by which it was developed and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. In addition, pursuant to National Association of Securities Dealers ConductFINRA Rule 2340, which took effect on April 11, 2016,2231, we are required to publish an updated estimated per share NAV on at least an annual basis. Our board of directorsThe Board will make decisions regarding the valuation methodology to be employed, who will perform valuations of our assets and the frequency of such valuations; provided, however, that the determination of the estimated per share NAV must be conducted by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert and must be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice. Our board of directorsThe Board established an updated estimated per share NAV on August 14, 2020 of $9.37$7.31 per share asusing a valuation date of December 31, 2017,June 30, 2020, using a methodology that conformed to standard industry practice. However, as set forth above, there is no public trading market for the shares at this time and stockholders may not receive $9.37$7.31 per share if a market did exist. We have not made any adjustments to the valuation of our estimated per share NAV for the impact of other transactions occurring subsequent to August 14, 2020, including, but not limited to, our entry into the Merger Agreements on August 30, 2020 or the consummation of the Mergers on December 21, 2020.
In determining the estimated per share NAVs as of August 31, 2015, SeptemberJune 30, 2016, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, the board of directors2020, our Board considered information and analysis, including valuation materials that were provided by Duff & Phelps, LLC (“Duff & Phelps”), information provided by CR IV Advisors, LLC,CMFT Management, and the estimated per share NAV recommendation made by the valuation, compensation and affiliate transactions committee of the board of directors,our Board, which committee is comprised entirely of all of our independent directors. See our Current Reports on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 27, 2015, Novemberand August 14, 2016, March 28, 2017 and March 30, 2018,2020, for additional information regarding Duff & Phelps and its valuation materials.
Share Redemption Program
Our board of directorsThe Board has adopted a share redemption program that enables our stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances. Our share redemption program permits stockholders to sell their shares back to us,circumstances, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.
Our common stock is currently not listed on a national securities exchange, and we will not seek to list our stock unless and until such time as our independent directors believe that the listing of our stock would be in the best interest of our stockholders. In order to provide stockholders with the benefit of interim liquidity, stockholders who have held their shares for at least one year may present all, or a portion, of their shares consisting of at least the lesser of (1) 25% of the stockholder’s shares; or (2) a number of shares with an aggregate redemption price of at least $2,500,$2,500, to us for redemption at any time in

50



accordance with the procedures outlined below. At that time, we may, subject to the conditions and limitations described below, redeem the shares presented for redemption for cash to the extent that we have sufficient funds available to us to fund such redemption. We will not pay to our advisorsponsor, our Board, or manager or its affiliates any fees to complete any transactions under our share redemption program.
The per share redemption price (other than for shares purchased pursuant to our DRIP and as provided below for redemptions due to a stockholder’s death) depends on the length of time the stockholder has held such shares as follows: after two years from the purchase date, 97.5% of the most recently determined estimated per share NAV; and after three years from the purchase date, 100% of the most recently determined estimated per share NAV. During this time period, theThe redemption price for shares purchased
50

Table of Contents

pursuant to our DRIP will be 100% of the most recently determined estimated per share NAV. In each case, the redemption price will be adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock. Until September 30, 2015, the most recent estimated value per share for purposes of our share redemption program was $10.00 per share, the purchase price per share in the primary portion of the Offering. From October 1, 2015 until November 13, 2016, the most recently determinedThe estimated per share NAV for purposes of our share redemption program as of December 31, 2020 was $9.70$7.31 per share, thewhich estimated per share NAV as of August 31, 2015, aswas determined by the boardour Board on August 14, 2020 using a valuation date of directors. From November 14, 2016 until March 27, 2017, the most recently determined estimated per share NAV for purposes of our share redemption program was $9.92 per share, the estimated per share NAV as of SeptemberJune 30, 2016, as determined by the board of directors. From March 28, 2017 until March 28, 2018, the most recently determined estimated per share NAV for purposes of our share redemption program was $10.08 per share, the estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2016, as determined by the board of directors.2020. As a result of the board of directors’our Board’s determination of an updated estimated per share NAV of our shares of common stock on August 14, 2020, the estimated per share NAV of $9.37$7.31 as of December 31, 2017June 30, 2020 will serve as the most recent estimated per share NAV for purposes of the share redemption program, effective March 29, 2018,August 14, 2020 until such time as the board of directorsBoard determines a new estimated per share NAV. We have not made any adjustments to the valuation of our estimated per share NAV for the impact of other transactions occurring subsequent to August 14, 2020, including, but not limited to, our entry into the Merger Agreements on August 30, 2020 or the consummation of the Mergers on December 21, 2020.
In determining the redemption price, we consider shares to have been redeemed from a stockholder’s account on a first-in, first-out basis. Our board of directorsThe Board will announce any redemption price adjustment and the time period of its effectiveness as a part of its regular communications with our stockholders. If we have sold a property and have made one or more special distributions to our stockholders of all or a portion of the net proceeds from such sales, the per share redemption price will be reduced by the net sale proceeds per share distributed to stockholders prior to the redemption date. Our board of directorsThe Board will, in its sole discretion, determine which distributions, if any, constitute a special distribution. While our board of directorsBoard does not have specific criteria for determining a special distribution, we expect that a special distribution will only occur upon the sale of a property and the subsequent distribution of the net sale proceeds.
Upon receipt of a request for redemption, we may conduct a Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) search to ensure that no liens are held against the shares. Any costs for conducting the UCC search will be borne by us.
In the event of the death of a stockholder, we must receive notice from the stockholder’s estate within 270 days after the stockholder’s death in order to be eligible for a redemption due to a stockholder’s death. Shares redeemed in connection with a stockholder’s death will be redeemed at a purchase price per share equal to 100% of the estimated per share NAV.
In the event that a stockholder requests a redemption of all of their shares, and such stockholder is participating in our DRIP, the stockholder will be deemed to have notified us, at the time they submit their redemption request, that such stockholder is terminating its participation in our DRIP, and has elected to receive future distributions in cash. This election will continue in effect even if less than all of such stockholder’s shares are redeemed unless they notify us that they wish to resume their participation in our DRIP.
We will limit the number of shares redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program as follows: (1) we will not redeem in excess of 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12 months prior to the end of the fiscal quarter for which the redemptions are being paid; and (2) funding for the redemption of shares will be limited, among other things, to the net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares under our DRIP, net of shares redeemed to date. In an effort to accommodate redemption requests throughout the calendar year, we intend to limit quarterly redemptions to approximately 1.25% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12-month12-month period ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter, and funding for redemptions for each quarter generally will be limited, among other things, to the net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares in the respective quarter under our DRIP; however, our management may waive these quarterly limitations in its sole discretion, subject to the 5% cap on the number of shares we may redeem during the respective trailing 12-month12-month period. Any of the foregoing limits might prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any quarter, in which case quarterly redemptions will be made pro rata, except as described below. Our management also reserves the right, in its sole discretion at any time, and from time to time, to reject any request for redemption for any reason.

51



We will redeem our shares no later than the end of the month following the end of each fiscal quarter. Requests for redemption must be received on or prior to the end of the fiscal quarter in order for us to repurchase the shares in the month following the end of that fiscal quarter. A stockholder may withdraw their request to have shares redeemed, but all such requests generally must be submitted prior to the last business day of the applicable fiscal quarter. Any redemption capacity that is not used as a result of the withdrawal or rejection of redemption requests may be used to satisfy the redemption requests of other stockholders received for that fiscal quarter, and such redemption payments may be made at a later time than when that quarter’s redemption payments are made.
We will determine whether we have sufficient funds and/or shares available as soon as practicable after the end of each fiscal quarter, but in any event prior to the applicable payment date. If we cannot purchase all shares presented for redemption in any fiscal quarter, based upon insufficient cash available and/or the limit on the number of shares we may redeem during any quarter or year, we will give priority to the redemption of deceased stockholders’ shares. While deceased stockholders’ shares will be included in calculating the maximum number of shares that may be redeemed in any annual or quarterly period, they will not be subject to the annual or quarterly percentage caps; therefore, if the volume of requests to redeem deceased
51

stockholders’ shares in a particular quarter were large enough to cause the annual or quarterly percentage caps to be exceeded, even if no other redemption requests were processed, the redemptions of deceased stockholders’ shares would be completed in full, assuming sufficient proceeds from the sale of shares under our DRIP, net of shares redeemed to date, were available. If sufficient proceeds from the sale of shares under our DRIP, net of shares redeemed to date, were not available to pay all such redemptions in full, the requests to redeem deceased stockholders’ shares would be honored on a pro rata basis. We next will give priority to requests for full redemption of accounts with a balance of 250 shares or less at the time we receive the request, in order to reduce the expense of maintaining small accounts. Thereafter, we will honor the remaining redemption requests on a pro rata basis. Following such quarterly redemption period, if a stockholder would like to resubmit the unsatisfied portion of the prior request for redemption, such stockholder must submit a new request for redemption of such shares prior to the last day of the new quarter. Unfulfilled requests for redemption will not be carried over automatically to subsequent redemption periods.
Our boardshare redemption program is only intended to provide interim liquidity for stockholders until a liquidity event occurs, which may include the sale of directors may choosethe Company, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, a merger or similar transaction, an alternative strategy that will result in a significant increase in opportunities for stockholders to amend, suspendredeem their shares or terminatethe listing of the shares of our common stock for trading on a national securities exchange. We cannot guarantee that a liquidity event will occur.
The shares we redeem under our share redemption program are canceled and returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares. We do not intend to resell such shares to the public unless they are first registered with the SEC under the Securities Act and under appropriate state securities laws or otherwise sold in compliance with such laws.
In order to manage the financial health of the Company, the Board approved and adopted an amended and restated share redemption program (the “Amended Share Redemption Program”) that, among other changes, provides that the Amended Share Redemption Program may be amended, suspended or terminated at any time upon 30 days’by majority vote of the Board without prior notice toif the Board believes such action is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. In connection with our stockholders.entry into the Merger Agreements, on August 30, 2020, the Board approved the suspension of the Amended Share Redemption Program. On March 25, 2021, the Board approved the reinstatement of the share redemption program effective April 1, 2021. No shares were redeemed from our stockholders during the period in which the Amended Share Redemption Program was suspended. Additionally, we will be required to discontinue sales of shares under our Secondary DRIP Offering on the date we sell all of the shares registered for sale under the Secondary DRIP Offering, unless we register additional DRIP shares to be offered pursuant to an effective registration statement with the SEC and applicable states. Because the redemption of shares will be funded with the net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares under our Secondary DRIP Offering, net of shares redeemed to date, the discontinuance or termination of our Secondary DRIP Offering will adversely affect our ability to redeem shares under the share redemption program.Amended Share Redemption Program. We will notify our stockholders of such developments (1) in our next annual or quarterly report or (2) by means of a separate mailing, accompanied by disclosure in a current or periodic report under the Exchange Act.
Our share redemption program is only intended to provide interim liquidity for stockholders until a liquidity event occurs, which may include the sale of the Company, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, a merger or similar transaction, an
alternative strategy that will result in a significant increase in opportunities for stockholders to redeem their shares or the listing of the shares of our common stock for trading on a national securities exchange. We cannot guarantee that a liquidity event will occur.
The shares we redeem under our share redemption program are canceled and returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares. We do not intend to resell such shares to the public unless they are first registered with the SEC under the Securities Act and under appropriate state securities laws or otherwise sold in compliance with such laws.
We received redemption requests for approximately 11.1 million shares (or $111.9 million) in excess of the net proceeds we received from issuance of shares under the DRIP Offerings during the three months ended December 31, 2017. Management, in its discretion, limited the amount of shares redeemed for the three months ended December 31, 2017 to an amount equal to net proceeds we received from the sale of shares pursuant to the DRIP Offerings during the period. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we received valid redemption requests under our Amended Share Redemption Program totaling approximately 48.3 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 3.8 million shares as of December 31, 2020 for $28.5 million (at an average redemption price of $7.60 per share). The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 44.5 million shares went unfulfilled. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we received valid redemption requests under our share redemption program totaling approximately 44.288.6 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 7.67.2 million shares as of December 31, 20172019 for $76.6$62.4 million (at an average redemption price of $10.08$8.65 per share) and approximately 2.42.3 million shares subsequent to December 31, 20172019 for $24.3$19.5 million (at an average redemption price of $10.08$8.65 per share). The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 34.2 million shares went unfulfilled. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we received valid redemption requests under our share redemption program totaling approximately 14.9 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 8.6 million shares as of December 31, 2016 for $83.1 million (at an average redemption price of $9.62 per share) and approximately 2.7 million shares subsequent to December 31, 2016 for $27.1 million (at an average redemption price of $9.91 per share). The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 3.679.1 million shares went unfulfilled. A valid redemption request is one that complies with the applicable requirements and guidelines of our current share redemption programAmended Share Redemption Program set forth above. We funded such redemptions with proceeds from our DRIP Offerings. During the years ended

52



December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we issued approximately 10.14.2 million and 11.29.3 million shares of common stock, respectively, under the DRIP Offerings, for proceeds of $101.3$34.2 million and $109.2$82.4 million, respectively, which were recorded as redeemable common stock on the consolidated balance sheets, net of any redemptions paid.paid, prior to the suspension of the Amended Share Redemption Program on August 30, 2020.
In general, we redeem shares on a quarterly basis. DuringHowever, as a result of the Board’s decision to suspend the Amended Share Redemption Program on August 30, 2020, we did not redeem any shares during the three-month period ended December 31, 2017, we redeemed shares, including those redeemable due to death, as follows:2020.
Period 
Total Number
of Shares
Redeemed
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
 
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
October 1, 2017 - October 31, 2017 732
 $10.08
 732
 (1)
November 1, 2017 - November 30, 2017 2,479,428
 $10.08
 2,479,428
 (1)
December 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 4,907
 $10.08
 4,907
 (1)
Total 2,485,067
   2,485,067
 (1)

(1)A description of the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our share redemption program is included in the narrative preceding this table.


See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Share Redemptions in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and Note 1314 — Stockholders’ Equity to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional share redemption information.
52

Table of Contents

Distributions
We elected to be taxed, and currently qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2012. As a REIT, we have made, and intend to continue to make, distributions each taxable year equal to at least 90% of our taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains). One of our primary goals is to pay regular (monthly) distributions to our stockholders.
See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Distributions in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on distributions.
For federal income tax purposes, distributions to common stockholders are characterized as ordinary dividends, capital gain distributions, or nondividend distributions. To the extent that we make a distribution in excess of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be a nontaxable return of capital, reducing the tax basis in each U.S. stockholder’s shares. In addition, the amount of distributions in excess of U.S. stockholders’ tax basis in their shares will be taxable as a capital gain realized from the sale of those shares. See Note 1415 — Income Taxes to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the character of the distributions paid during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018.
The following table shows the distributions declared on a per share basis during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 (in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ending December 31,Total Distributions
Declared
Distributions Declared
per Common Share
2020$119,305 $0.38 
2019$194,463 $0.625 
2018$194,573 $0.625 

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Year Ending December 31, 
Total Distributions
Declared
 
Distributions Declared
per Common Share
  
2017 $194,687
 $0.625
2016 $194,834
 $0.625
2015 $193,311
 $0.625
Not applicable.

53

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain amounts presented below have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Policies to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the various reclassifications. The selected financial data (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) presented below was derived from our consolidated financial statements.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Balance Sheet Data:          
Total real estate and related assets, net $4,627,546
 $4,534,010
 $4,484,326
 $3,923,840
 $2,203,056
Cash and cash equivalents $4,745
 $9,754
 $26,316
 $55,287
 $300,574
Total assets $4,728,689
 $4,624,335
 $4,582,199
 $4,031,468
 $2,544,324
Notes payable and credit facility, net $2,471,763
 $2,246,259
 $2,066,563
 $1,458,828
 $689,621
Intangible lease liabilities, net $45,572
 $49,075
 $53,822
 $55,535
 $37,485
Total liabilities $2,572,024
 $2,357,566
 $2,195,084
 $1,583,090
 $775,868
Redeemable common stock and noncontrolling interest $186,453
 $188,938
 $190,561
 $121,972
 $26,484
Total stockholders’ equity $1,970,212
 $2,077,831
 $2,196,554
 $2,326,406
 $1,741,972
Operating Data:          
Total revenues $424,095
 $407,451
 $367,731
 $256,282
 $102,557
Total operating expenses $270,900
 $258,267
 $243,531
 $210,852
 $113,253
Operating income (loss) $153,195
 $149,184
 $124,200
 $45,430
 $(10,696)
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company $79,420
 $71,842
 $64,771
 $11,190
 $(32,880)
Cash Flow Data:   

      
Net cash provided by operating activities $198,925
 $192,296
 $182,885
 $89,086
 $7,570
Net cash used in investing activities $(223,386) $(187,746) $(673,009) $(1,743,988) $(1,695,287)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $20,510
 $(21,346) $464,867
 $1,405,982
 $1,982,066
Per Share Data:          
Net income (loss) - basic and diluted $0.25
 $0.23
 $0.21
 $0.04
 $(0.36)
Distributions declared per common share $0.625
 $0.625
 $0.625
 $0.625
 $0.625
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted 311,677,149
 311,863,844
 309,263,576
 292,072,088
 90,330,927




54



ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 6. Selected Financial Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. See also the Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements section preceding Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For a comparison of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, see Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Overview
We were formed on July 27, 2010, and we elected to be taxed, and currently qualify, as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2012. We commenced our principal operations on April 13, 2012, when we satisfied the conditions of our escrow agreement regarding the minimum offering and issued approximately 308,000 shares of our common stock. We have no paid employees and are externally advised and managed by CR IV Advisors. On February 1, 2018, the Transaction, as discussedCMFT Management and, with respect to investments in Part I, Item 1. Business — Formation, was completed. Immediately following the completion of the Transaction,securities, our Investment Advisor. CIM indirectly owns and/or controls CR IV Advisors;CMFT Management; our dealer manager, CCO Capital; our property manager, CREI Advisors; and CCO Group.
In addition, as part of the Transaction, pursuant to the Services Agreement, VEREIT OP will continue to provide certain services to CCO Group and to us, including operational real estate support. VEREIT OP will continue to provide such services through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITs with respect to its 2018 fiscal year) and will provide consulting and research services through December 31, 2023 as requested by CCO Group, LLC.
Despite the indirect change of ownership and control of our advisor, dealer manager, property manager and sponsor, we expect that, during the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, the advisory, dealer manager and property management services we receive will continue without any material changes in personnel (except as supplemented by the management oversight of CIM personnel) or material change in service procedures. During the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, CCO Group, LLC intends to evaluate and effectuate an appropriate transition of VEREIT OP’s services under the Services Agreement to other CIM affiliates or third parties with the goal of ensuring continuity and minimizing disruption.
We ceased issuing shares in our Offering on April 4, 2014 and in the Initial DRIP Offering effective as of June 30, 2016, but will continue to issue shares of common stock under the Secondary DRIP Offering until certain liquidity events occur, such as the listing of our shares, on a national securities exchange or the sale of our company, or the Secondary DRIP Offering is otherwise terminated by our boardBoard. We suspended issuing shares of directors.common stock under our Secondary DRIP Offering on August 30, 2020, in connection with our entry into the Merger Agreements. On March 25, 2021, the Board approved reinstating the DRIP effective April 1, 2021. We expect that property acquisitions in 20182021 and future periods will be funded by proceeds from financing of the acquired properties, cash flows from operations and the strategic sale of properties and other investments.asset acquisitions.
Our operating results and cash flows are primarily influenced by rental and other property income from our commercial properties, interest expense on our indebtedness and acquisition and operating expenses. Rental and other property income accounted for 88% and 87% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As 97.5%94.1% of our rentable square feet
53

was under lease, including any month-to-month agreements, as of December 31, 20172020 with a weighted average remaining lease term of 9.68.8 years, we believe our exposure to changes in commercial rental rates on our portfolio is substantially mitigated, except for vacancies caused by tenant bankruptcies or other factors. CR IV Advisorsfactors, including due to circumstances related to COVID-19. Our manager regularly monitors the creditworthiness of our tenants by reviewing each tenant’s financial results, any available credit rating agency reports when available, on the tenant or guarantor, the operating history of the property with such tenant, the tenant’s market share and track record within its industry segment, the general health and outlook of the tenant’s industry segment and other information for changes and possible trends. If CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management identifies significant changes or trends that may adversely affect the creditworthiness of a tenant, it will gather a more in-depth knowledge of the tenant’s financial condition and, if necessary, attempt to mitigate the tenant credit risk by evaluating the possible sale of the property or identifying a possible replacement tenant should the current tenant fail to perform on the lease.
Our Business EnvironmentWe have primarily acquired core commercial real estate assets principally consisting of retail properties located throughout the United States. As of December 31, 2020, we owned 516 properties, comprising 21.3 million rentable square feet of commercial space located in 45 states.
In April 2019, we announced our intention to pursue a more diversified investment strategy across the capital structure by balancing our existing portfolio of core commercial real estate assets with our future investments in a portfolio of commercial mortgage loans and Current Outlookother real estate-related credit investments, in which our sponsor and its affiliates have expertise, that we would originate, acquire, finance and manage.
CurrentAs of December 31, 2020, our loan portfolio consisted of 206 loans with a net book value of $892.3 million. As of December 31, 2020, we had $41.0 million of unsettled broadly syndicated loan purchases included in cash and cash equivalents, and investments in real estate-related securities of $38.2 million.
Pursuant to our strategy, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we disposed of 30 properties, encompassing 1.7 million gross rentable square feet. We previously expected to sell a substantial portion of our anchored-shopping center portfolio and certain single-tenant properties within 24 months of December 31, 2019, subject to market conditions. In light of current market conditions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, we cannot provide assurance that these properties will be sold within such 24-month period. As a result, we placed 15 properties with a carrying value of $228.4 million that were previously classified as held for sale back in service as real estate assets in the globalconsolidated balance sheets during the year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, our portfolio consisted of 455 retail properties, 56 anchored shopping centers, four industrial properties and one office property representing 34 industry sectors. See Note 4 — Real Estate Assets to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the disposition of individual properties during the year ended December 31, 2020.
COVID-19
The COVID-19 outbreak and the associated “shelter-in-place” or “stay-at-home” orders or other quarantine mandates or public health guidance issued by local, state or federal authorities has adversely affected a number of our tenants’ businesses. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact our operations and those of our tenants will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we provided lease concessions, either in the form of rental deferrals or abatements, to certain tenants in response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. As of December 31, 2020, we granted total rent deferrals with an aggregate deferral amount of $6.2 million. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, we granted rent abatements to tenants with an abatement amount of $4.1 million, which reduced revenues during the year ended December 31, 2020.
As of March 24, 2021, we have collected approximately 98% of rental payments billed to tenants during the three months ended December 31, 2020. There have been no significant changes in rent collections subsequent to December 31, 2020.
Additionally, COVID-19 has caused us to materially increase our provision for credit losses related to our mezzanine loans. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a $58.0 million net increase in our provision for credit losses related to our mezzanine loans. This provision for credit losses reflects, among other things, the macroeconomic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on commercial real estate markets generally, as well as certain loans assessed for impairment in our portfolio. Further, this reserve is not reflective of what we expect our provision for credit losses to be absent the current and potential future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. If the adverse macroeconomic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic persist or worsen, we may further materially increase our provision for credit losses, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make distributions.
54

Table of Contents

We are actively managing our response to the COVID-19 pandemic in collaboration with our tenants and business partners and are assessing potential impacts to our financial position and operating results, as well as potential adverse developments in our business. On April 20, 2020, our Board decided to make a determination as to the amount and timing of distributions on a monthly, instead of a quarterly, basis, and to value our assets for the purpose of updated the estimated per share NAV on a quarterly, rather than annual basis, until such time that we had greater visibility into the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic would have on our tenants’ ability to continue to pay rent on their leases on a timely basis or at all, the degree to which federal, state or local governmental authorities grant rent relief or other relief or amnesty programs applicable to our tenants, our ability to access the capital markets, remain volatile as the world’s economic growth has been affected by geopolitical and economic events. Inon the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. Given the relative stability of the Company’s rent collections and the per share NAV for the quarters ended March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the Board determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to cease incurring the additional costs associated with quarterly valuations and return to updating the Company’s per share NAV on an annual basis in accordance with its valuation policies. On March 25, 2021, the Board resumed declaring distributions on a quarterly basis by declaring a monthly per share distribution for the months of March, April, May and June. See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Distributions for a further discussion of distributions declared.
Mergers
On December 21, 2020, we completed the Mergers pursuant to the Merger Agreements dated August 30, 2020, as amended, with CCIT III Merger Sub and CCPT V Merger Sub each surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of ours. In accordance with the MGCL, the separate existence of CCIT III and CCPT V ceased. Through the Mergers, we acquired 146 properties with a total of 3.8 million square feet, all of which had an aggregate gross real estate value of approximately $763.0 million. The combined company after the Mergers retained the name “CIM Real Estate Finance Trust, Inc.” Each Merger qualified as a “reorganization” under, and within the meaning of, Section 368(a) of the Code.
Additionally, on August 30, 2020, we, along with Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”) and Thor II Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of ours (“CCIT II Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “CCIT II Merger Agreement”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the CCIT II Merger Agreement, CCIT II would have merged with and into CCIT II Merger Sub (the “CCIT II Merger”), with CCIT II Merger Sub surviving the CCIT II Merger, such that following the CCIT II Merger, the surviving entity would continue as a wholly owned subsidiary of ours.
On October 29, 2020, CCIT II terminated the CCIT II Merger Agreement pursuant to Sections 9.1(c)(ii) and 9.2 of the CCIT II Merger Agreement and entered into an agreement (the “Termination Notice”) with us reflecting such termination and pursuant to which, among other things, CCIT II paid the termination fee equal to $7.38 million to us in accordance with the CCIT II Merger Agreement, and agreed to pay to us the amount of our expenses up to $3.69 million, required to be paid pursuant to the terms of the CCIT II Merger Agreement (such amounts together, the “CCIT II Termination Payment”).
Operating Highlights and Key Performance Indicators
2020 Activity
Completed the Mergers, which included the acquisition of 146 properties with an aggregate value of $763.0 million and the assumption of debt totaling $379.7 million.
In addition to the property acquisitions related to the Mergers, we acquired four properties for an aggregate purchase price of $35.5 million.
Invested $582.7 million in broadly syndicated loans and sold broadly syndicated loans for an aggregate gross sales price of $42.0 million.
Received payment in full on one senior loan totaling $40.8 million.
Disposed of 30 properties, consisting of 20 retail properties and 10 anchored shopping centers, for an aggregate sales price of $270.4 million.
Entered into two repurchase agreements that provide up to $800.0 million to finance a portfolio of existing and future commercial real estate mortgage loans.
Increased total debt by $303.3 million, from $1.6 billion to $2.1 billion.

55

Table of Contents

Portfolio Information
The following table shows the carrying value of our portfolio by investment type as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:
 As of December 31,
20202019
Asset CountCarrying ValueAsset CountCarrying Value
Loan Held-For-Investment
Mezzanine loans8$147,475 3.5 %8$146,060 4.7 %
Senior loans4341,546 8.1 %3152,820 4.9 %
Broadly syndicated loans194473,603 11.3 %12,750 0.1 %
Less: Allowance for credit losses(70,358)(1.7)%— — %
Total loans-held-for-investment and related receivable, net206892,266 21.2 %12301,630 9.7 %
Real Estate-Related Securities
CMBS438,194 0.9 %— — %
Real Estate
Total real estate assets and intangible lease liabilities, net5163,278,905 77.9 %3962,800,709 90.3 %
Total Investment Portfolio726$4,209,365 100.0 %408$3,102,339 100.0 %
The following table details overall statistics of our credit portfolio as of December 31, 2020 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Mezzanine Loans (1) (2)
Senior Loans (1) (2)
Broadly Syndicated LoansCMBS
Number of loans194 
Net book value$89,437 $338,956 $463,873 $38,194 
Weighted-average interest rate14.1 %4.9 %3.8 %6.8 %
Weighted-average maximum years to maturity0.4 3.0 4.98.0 

(1)    As of December 31, 2020, 100% of the our loans by principal balance earned a floating rate of interest, primarily indexed to U.S. dollar LIBOR.
(2)    Maximum maturity date assumes all extension options are exercised by the borrowers; however, our CRE loans may be repaid prior to such date.
Real Estate Portfolio Information
As of December 31, 2020, we owned 516 properties located in 45 states, the gross rentable square feet of which was 94.1% leased, including any month-to-month agreements, with a weighted average lease term remaining of 8.8 years. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we disposed of 30 properties, for an aggregate gross sales price of $270.4 million.
The following table shows the property statistics of our real estate assets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:
 As of December 31,
 20202019
Number of commercial properties516 396 
Rentable square feet (in thousands) (1)
21,309 19,103 
Percentage of rentable square feet leased94.1 %94.6 %
Percentage of investment-grade tenants (2)
38.0 %36.9 %

(1)Includes square feet of buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
(2)Investment-grade tenants are those with a credit rating of BBB- or higher by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“Standard & Poor’s”) or a credit rating of Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”). The ratings may reflect those assigned by Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s to the lease guarantor or the parent company, as applicable. The
56

Table of Contents

weighted average credit rating is weighted based on annualized rental income and is for only those tenants rated by Standard & Poor’s.
The following table summarizes our real estate acquisition activity during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
  
Year Ended December 31,
 20202019
Commercial properties acquired150 
Purchase price of acquired properties (in thousands)$798,500 $6,165 
Rentable square feet (in thousands) (1)
3,945 

(1)     Includes square feet of buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
The following table shows the tenant diversification of our real estate portfolio, based on annualized rental income, as of December 31, 2020:
20202020Percentage of
TotalLeasedAnnualizedAnnualized2020
NumberSquare FeetRental IncomeRental IncomeAnnualized
Tenant
of Leases (1)
(in thousands) (2)
(in thousands)
per Square Foot (2)
Rental Income
Walgreens37 544 $13,429 $24.69 %
Lowe’s15 1,899 13,270 6.99 %
Academy Sports2,016 12,311 6.11 %
CVS42 529 11,920 22.53 %
United Oil64 10,928 170.75 %
L.A. Fitness410 7,860 19.17 %
PetSmart28 485 7,745 15.97 %
Home Depot555 7,408 13.35 %
Dick’s Sporting Goods13 572 6,894 12.05 %
Cabela’s403 6,544 16.24 %
Other872 12,566 168,865 13.44 63 %
1,032 20,043 $267,174 $13.33 100 %

(1)     Includes leases which are master lease agreements.
(2)     Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
57

Table of Contents

The following table shows the tenant industry diversification of our real estate portfolio, based on annualized rental income, as of December 31, 2020:
20202020Percentage of
TotalLeasedAnnualizedAnnualized2020
NumberSquare FeetRental IncomeRental IncomeAnnualized
Industry
of Leases (1)
(in thousands) (2)
(in thousands)
per Square Foot (2)
Rental Income
Sporting goods38 3,482 $32,818 $9.43 12 %
Home and garden51 3,182 29,703 9.33 11 %
Discount store117 2,627 27,050 10.30 10 %
Pharmacy79 1,073 25,349 23.62 %
Grocery and supermarket39 1,696 21,038 12.40 %
Gas and convenience12 91 13,156 144.57 %
Casual dining77 453 12,436 27.45 %
Pet supply40 635 10,115 15.93 %
Apparel and jewelry68 716 9,949 13.90 %
Entertainment and recreation20 554 9,412 16.99 %
Other491 5,534 76,148 13.76 29 %
1,032 20,043 $267,174 $13.33 100 %

(1)     Includes leases which are master lease agreements.
(2)     Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.

The following table shows the geographic diversification of our real estate portfolio, based on annualized rental income, as of December 31, 2020:
20202020Percentage of
TotalRentableAnnualizedAnnualized2020
Number ofSquare FeetRental IncomeRental IncomeAnnualized
LocationProperties
(in thousands) (1)
(in thousands)
per Square Foot (1)
Rental Income
California61 833 $28,161 $33.81 11 %
Ohio38 1,879 21,157 11.26 %
Georgia20 1,770 20,348 11.50 %
Texas56 1,315 18,887 14.36 %
Illinois20 1,216 14,501 11.93 %
Florida30 1,138 14,229 12.50 %
Indiana24 1,184 13,606 11.49 %
Wisconsin16 1,113 13,455 12.09 %
North Carolina25 1,085 12,996 11.98 %
Alabama27 951 11,639 12.24 %
Other199 8,825 98,195 11.13 37 %
516 21,309 $267,174 $12.54 100 %

(1)     Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
58

Table of Contents

The following table shows the property type diversification of our real estate portfolio, based on annualized rental income, as of December 31, 2020:
20202020Percentage of
TotalRentableAnnualizedAnnualized2020
Number ofSquare FeetRental IncomeRental IncomeAnnualized
Property TypeProperties
(in thousands) (1)
(in thousands)
per Square Foot (1)
Rental Income
Retail455 10,686 $150,316 $14.07 56 %
Anchored shopping centers56 8,614 104,655 12.15 39 %
Industrial1,788 9,392 5.25 %
Office221 2,811 12.72 %
516 21,309 $267,174 $12.54 100 %

(1)     Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
Leases
Although there are variations in the specific terms of the leases of our properties, the following is a summary of the general structure of our current leases. Generally, the leases of the properties acquired provide for initial terms of ten or more years and provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options, subject to generally the same terms and conditions as the initial lease term. Certain leases also provide that in the event we wish to sell the property subject to that lease, we first must offer the lessee the right to purchase the property on the same terms and conditions as any offer which we intend to accept for the sale of the property. The properties are generally leased under net leases pursuant to which the tenant bears responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance, while certain of the leases require us to maintain the roof, structure and parking areas of the building. Additionally, certain leases provide for increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. The leases of the properties provide for annual rental payments (payable in monthly installments) ranging from $7,000 to $8.0 million (average of $234,000). Certain leases provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases or increases in the consumer price index.
The following table shows lease expirations of our real estate portfolio, as of December 31, 2020, during each of the next ten years and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options:
2020
TotalLeasedAnnualized2020Percentage of
NumberSquare FeetRental IncomeAnnualized2020
of LeasesExpiringExpiringRental IncomeAnnualized
Year of Lease Expiration
Expiring (1)
(in thousands) (2)
(in thousands)
per Square Foot (2)
Rental Income
202197 804 $10,433 $12.98 %
202284 845 10,113 11.97 %
2023133 1,358 21,465 15.81 %
2024127 1,758 23,300 13.25 %
2025112 1,576 19,481 12.36 %
202672 1,546 18,208 11.78 %
202761 1,406 13,906 9.89 %
202856 1,082 12,358 11.42 %
202971 1,020 15,690 15.38 %
203047 903 15,993 17.71 %
Thereafter172 7,745 106,227 13.72 40 %
1,032 20,043 $267,174 $13.33 100 %

(1)     Includes leases which are master lease agreements.
(2)     Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
59

Table of Contents

The following table shows the economic environment continuedmetrics of our real estate assets as of and for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
20202019
Economic Metrics
Weighted-average lease term (in years) (1)
8.88.6
Lease rollover (1)(2):
Annual average6.3%7.1%
Maximum for a single year8.7%10.9%

(1)Based on annualized rental income of our real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
(2)Through the end of the next five years as of the respective reporting date.
Results of Operations
Overview
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other than the effects of the outbreak of COVID-19, and national economic conditions affecting real estate in general, that may reasonably be expected to improvehave a material impact on our results from the acquisition, management and operation of properties other than those listed in 2017. During 2017,Part I, Item 1A — Risk Factors. Currently, we are unable to predict the U.S.impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in future periods due to numerous uncertainties.
For a comparison of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Same Store Analysis
Our results of operations are influenced by the timing of acquisitions and the operating performance of our real gross domestic product increased 2.3%,estate assets. We review our stabilized operating results, measured by net operating income, from properties that we owned for the unemployment rate decreased 0.6 percentage pointsentirety of both the current and prior year reporting periods, referred to 4.1%,as “same store” properties, and Core CPI,we believe that the presentation of operating results for same store properties provides useful information to stockholders. Net operating income is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure of inflationa real estate company’s operating performance. Net operating income is considered by management to be a helpful supplemental performance measure, as it enables management to evaluate the impact of occupancy, rents, leasing activity, and other controllable property operating results at our real estate properties, and it provides a consistent method for the comparison of our properties. We define net operating income as operating revenues less operating expenses, which removes foodexclude (i) depreciation and energy pricesamortization, (ii) interest expense and is seasonally adjusted, increased 1.8%,other non-property related revenue and expense items such as (a) general and administrative expenses, (b) management and advisory fees and expenses, (c) transaction-related expenses, (d) real estate impairment, (e) provision for credit losses, (f) gain on disposition of real estate, net, (g) merger-related items and (h) interest income. Our net operating income may not be comparable to that of other REITs and should not be considered to be more relevant or accurate in evaluating our operating performance than the current GAAP methodology used in calculating net income (loss). In determining the same store property pool, we include all properties that were owned for the entirety of both the current and prior reporting periods, except for properties during the current or prior year that were under development or redevelopment.
60

Table of Contents

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019
The following table reconciles net income, calculated in accordance with GAAP, to net operating income (dollar amounts in thousands):
Total
For the Year Ended December 31,
20202019Change
Net income$(23,518)$183,020 $(206,538)
Loss on extinguishment of debt4,841 7,227 (2,386)
Interest expense and other, net64,116 98,965 (34,849)
Operating income45,439 289,212 (243,773)
Merger termination fee income(7,380)— (7,380)
Merger-related expenses, net2,193 — 2,193 
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(27,518)(180,666)153,148 
Provision for credit losses68,356 — 68,356 
Real estate impairment16,737 72,939 (56,202)
Depreciation and amortization80,973 107,867 (26,894)
Transaction-related expenses905 2,278 (1,373)
Management and advisory fees and expenses44,743 42,339 2,404 
General and administrative expenses15,385 13,729 1,656 
Interest income(29,393)(20,132)(9,261)
Net operating income$210,440 $327,566 $(117,126)
Our operating segments include credit and real estate. Refer to Note 17 — Segment Reporting to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our operating segments.
Credit Segment
Interest Income
The increase in interest income of $9.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, was due to an increase in credit investments. As of December 31, 2020, we held investments in 194 broadly syndicated loans, 12 CRE loans held-for-investment and four CMBS. As of December 31, 2019, we held investments in one broadly syndicated loan and 11 CRE loans held-for-investment.
Provision for Credit Losses
The increase in provision for credit losses of $68.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period ain 2019, was primarily due to the adoption of current expected credit losses (“CECL”) on January 1, 2020 and management’s determination that the fair value of the collateral of the Company’s loans held-for-investment, which is based on comparable market sales, decreased compared to the amortized cost basis, which resulted in recording $68.4 million in credit losses during the year earlier.

ended December 31, 2020. No such losses were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019.
55
61

Table of Contents



Real Estate Segment
Economic trendsA total of 365 properties were acquired before January 1, 2019 and government policies affect globalrepresent our “same store” properties during the years ended December 31, 2020 and regional commercial2019. “Non-same store” properties, for purposes of the table below, includes properties acquired or disposed of on or after January 1, 2019.
The following table details the components of net operating income broken out between same store and non-same store properties (dollar amounts in thousands):
TotalSame StoreNon-Same Store
For the Year Ended December 31,For the Year Ended December 31,For the Year Ended December 31,
20202019Change20202019Change20202019Change
Rental and other property income$261,530 $393,224 $(131,694)$246,556 $255,869 $(9,313)$14,974 $137,355 $(122,381)
Property operating expenses23,399 33,462 (10,063)21,645 24,742 (3,097)1,754 8,720 (6,966)
Real estate tax expenses27,691 32,196 (4,505)26,300 25,460 840 1,391 6,736 (5,345)
Total property operating expenses51,090 65,658 (14,568)47,945 50,202 (2,257)3,145 15,456 (12,311)
Net operating income$210,440 $327,566 $(117,126)$198,611 $205,667 $(7,056)$11,829 $121,899 $(110,070)
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
The decrease in loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, was due to a decrease in the number of mortgage notes terminated in connection with the disposition of the underlying properties during the year ended December 31, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded losses on the extinguishment of mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $97.0 million, as compared to recording losses on the extinguishment of mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $258.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Interest Expense and Other, Net
Interest expense and other, net also includes amortization of deferred financing costs.
The decrease in interest expense and other, net, of $34.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, was primarily due to a decrease in the average aggregate amount of debt outstanding from $2.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019 to $1.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020, as a result of debt repayments in connection with the disposition of the underlying properties. In addition, the weighted average interest rate decreased from 3.9% as of December 31, 2019 to 3.4% as of December 31, 2020.
Merger Termination Fee Income
In connection with the Termination Notice, we received a termination fee of $7.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. No such fees were received during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Merger-Related Expenses, Net
In connection with the Mergers, we incurred fees and expenses of $2.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. No such fees were incurred during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Gain on Disposition of Real Estate, Net
The decrease in gain on disposition of real estate, net of $153.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, was due to the disposition of 30 properties for a gain of $27.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the disposition of 497 properties for a gain of $180.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Impairment
The decrease in impairments of $56.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, was due to 12 properties that were deemed to be impaired, resulting in impairment charges of $16.7 million during the
62

Table of Contents

year ended December 31, 2020, compared to 34 properties that were deemed to be impaired, resulting in impairment charges of $72.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Depreciation and Amortization
The decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses of $26.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, was primarily due to the disposition of 30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, partially offset by recognizing a full period of depreciation and amortization expenses on the one property acquired in 2019.
Transaction-Related Expenses
Through August 20, 2019, we paid CMFT Management or its affiliates acquisition fees of up to 2.0% of: (1) the contract purchase price of each property or asset we acquired; (2) the amount paid in respect of the development, construction or improvement of each asset we acquired; (3) the purchase price of any loan we acquired; and (4) the principal amount of any loan we originated. We also reimbursed CMFT Management or its affiliates for transaction-related expenses incurred in the process of acquiring a property or the origination or acquisition of a loan, so long as the total acquisition fees and expenses relating to the transaction did not exceed 6.0% of the contract purchase price, unless otherwise approved by a majority of our Board, including a majority of our independent directors, as commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to us. Other transaction-related expenses, such as manager reimbursements for disposition activities, are expensed as incurred.
The decrease in transaction-related expenses of $1.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, was primarily due to a decrease in reimbursements to our manager for expenses related to the 30 dispositions that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2020 for an aggregate sales price of $270.4 million, compared to such expenses related to the 497 dispositions that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2019 for an aggregate gross sales price of $1.7 billion.
Management and Advisory Fees and Expenses
Pursuant to the Prior Advisory Agreement with CMFT Management and based upon the amount of our current invested assets, through August 20, 2019, we were required to pay to CMFT Management a monthly advisory fee equal to one-twelfth of 0.75% of the average invested assets up to $2.0 billion, one-twelfth of 0.70% of the average invested assets over $2.0 billion up to $4.0 billion and one-twelfth of 0.65% of the average invested assets over $4.0 billion. Beginning on August 20, 2019, we pay CMFT Management a management fee pursuant to the Management Agreement, payable quarterly in arrears, equal to the greater of (a) $250,000 per annum ($62,500 per quarter) and (b) 1.50% per annum (0.375% per quarter) of the Company’s Equity (as defined in the Management Agreement). Additionally, we may be required to reimburse certain expenses incurred by CMFT Management in providing management services, subject to limitations as set forth in the Management Agreement (as discussed in Note 12 — Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements). Furthermore, as discussed in Note 12 — Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements, pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, for management of investments in the Managed Assets (as defined in the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement), CMFT Securities pays the Investment Advisor the Investment Advisory Fee, payable quarterly in arrears, equal to 1.50% per annum (0.375% per quarter) of CMFT Securities’ Equity (as defined in the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement). Pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, CMFT Securities reimburses the Investment Advisor for costs and expenses incurred by the Investment Advisor on its behalf. Because the Managed Assets are excluded from the calculation of management fees payable by the Company to CMFT Management pursuant to the Management Agreement, the total management and advisory fees payable by the Company to its external advisors are not increased as a result of the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement. In addition, pursuant to the Sub-Advisory Agreement, in connection with providing investment management services with respect to the corporate credit-related securities held by CMFT Securities, on a quarterly basis, the Investment Advisor designates 50% of the sum of the Investment Advisory Fee payable to the Investment Advisor as sub-advisory fees.
The increase in management and advisory fees and expenses of $2.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019, was due to the management fee we began paying CMFT Management beginning on August 20, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we incurred management fees of $40.0 million.
General and Administrative Expenses
The primary general and administrative expense items are certain expense reimbursements to our manager, banking fees and escrow and trustee fees.
63

Table of Contents

The increase in general and administrative expenses of $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, was primarily due to an increase in unused fees related to our credit facility, partially offset by a decrease in state franchise and income tax expenses.
Net Operating Income
Same store property net operating income decreased $7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The decrease was primarily due to reductions in rental and other property income of $3.8 million for amounts deemed not probable of collection at 39 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, overall same store occupancy was 93.2% as of December 31, 2020, compared to 95.0% as of December 31, 2019.
Non-same store property net operating income decreased $110.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The decrease is primarily due to the disposition of 497 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019 and the disposition of 30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, offset by recognizing a full period of net operating income for the one property acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019 and partial period of net operating income for the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Distributions
Prior to April 1, 2020, on a quarterly basis, our Board authorized a daily distribution for the succeeding quarter. Our Board authorized the following daily distribution amounts per share for the periods indicated below:
Period CommencingPeriod EndingDaily Distribution Amount
April 14, 2012December 31, 2012$0.001707848
January 1, 2013December 31, 2015$0.001712523
January 1, 2016December 31, 2016$0.001706776
January 1, 2017December 31, 2019$0.001711452
January 1, 2020March 31, 2020$0.001706776
On April 20, 2020, our Board decided to make a determination as to the amount and timing of distributions on a monthly, instead of a quarterly, basis until such time that we had greater visibility into the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic would have on our tenants’ ability to continue to pay rent on their leases on a timely basis or at all, the degree to which federal, state or local governmental authorities grant rent relief or other relief or amnesty programs applicable to our tenants, our ability to access the capital markets, and on the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. On March 25, 2021, the Board resumed declaring distributions on a quarterly basis by declaring a monthly per share distribution for the months of March, April, May and June of 2021. Since April of 2020, our Board authorized the following monthly distribution amounts per share for the periods indicated below:
64

Table of Contents

Record DateDistribution Amount
April 30, 2020$0.0130
May 31, 2020$0.0130
June 30, 2020$0.0161
July 30, 2020$0.0304
August 28, 2020$0.0303
September 29, 2020$0.0303
October 29, 2020$0.0303
November 27, 2020$0.0303
December 30, 2020$0.0303
January 28, 2021$0.0303
February 25, 2021$0.0303
March 29, 2021$0.0303
April 29 2021$0.0303
May 28, 2021$0.0303
June 29, 2021$0.0303
As of December 31, 2020, we had distributions payable of $11.0 million.
The following table presents distributions and source of distributions for the periods indicated below (dollar amounts in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
AmountPercentAmountPercent
Distributions paid in cash$90,655 73 %$112,083 58 %
Distributions reinvested34,191 27 %82,388 42 %
Total distributions$124,846 100 %$194,471 100 %
Source of distributions:
Net cash provided by operating activities (1)(2)
$115,985 93 %$194,471 100 %
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock8,308 (3)%— — %
Proceeds from the issuance of debt553 (4)— %— — %
Total sources$124,846 100 %$194,471 100 %

(1)Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $106.4 million and $188.6 million, respectively.
(2)Our distributions covered by cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include cash flows from operating activities in excess of distributions from prior periods of $9.6 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
(3)In accordance with GAAP, certain real estate acquisition-related fees and expenses, such as expenses and fees incurred in connection with property acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, are expensed, and therefore reduce net cash flows from operating activities. Therefore, for consistency, proceeds from the issuance of common stock used as a source of distributions for the year ended December 31, 2020 include the amount by which real estate acquisition-related fees and expenses have reduced net cash flows from operating activities in those prior periods.
(4)Net proceeds on the credit facilities and notes payable for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $159.0 million.
Share Redemptions
Our Amended Share Redemption Program permits our stockholders to sell their shares of common stock back to us, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Funding for the redemption of shares will be limited to the cumulative net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares under the Secondary DRIP Offering, net of shares redeemed to date. In addition, we will generally limit quarterly redemptions to approximately 1.25% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12-month period ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter for which the redemptions are being paid, and to the net
65


proceeds we receive from the sale of shares in the respective quarter under the Secondary DRIP Offering. Any of the foregoing limits might prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any fiscal quarter or in any 12-month period. In addition, our Board may choose to amend the terms of, suspend or terminate our Amended Share Redemption Program at any time in its sole discretion if it believes that such action is in the best interest of us and our stockholders. Any material modifications or suspension of the Amended Share Redemption Program will be disclosed to our stockholders as promptly as practicable in our reports filed with the SEC and via our website. In connection with the Mergers, our Board suspended our Amended Share Redemption Program on August 30, 2020, and therefore, no shares were redeemed from our stockholders after that date until the Amended Share Redemption Program was reinstated, effective April 1, 2021, by our Board on March 25, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we received valid redemption requests under our Amended Share Redemption Program totaling approximately 48.3 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 3.8 million shares as of December 31, 2020 for $28.5 million (at an average redemption price of $7.60 per share). The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 44.5 million shares went unfulfilled. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we received valid redemption requests under our share redemption program totaling approximately 88.6 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 7.2 million shares as of December 31, 2019 for $62.4 million (at an average redemption price of $8.65 per share) and approximately 2.3 million shares subsequent to December 31, 2019 for $19.5 million at an average redemption price of $8.65 per share. The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 79.1 million shares went unfulfilled. A valid redemption request is one that complies with the applicable requirements and guidelines of the share redemption program then in effect. The share redemptions were funded with proceeds from the Secondary DRIP Offering.
See the discussion of our Amended Share Redemption Program in Part II, Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Share Redemption Program in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
We expect to utilize proceeds from real estate dispositions, sales proceeds and principal payments received on credit investments, cash flows from operations and future proceeds from secured or unsecured financing to complete future acquisitions and for general corporate uses. The sources of our operating cash flows will primarily be provided by the rental and other property income received from current and future leased properties.
As of December 31, 2020, we had an unsecured credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “CMFT Credit Facility”) that provided for borrowings of up to $1.24 billion, which includes a $885.0 million unsecured term loan (the “CMFT Term Loan”) and up to $350.0 million in unsecured revolving loans (the “CMFT Revolving Loans”). During the year ended December 31, 2020, as a result of the Merger with CCPT V, we assumed CCPT V’s obligations pursuant to the credit agreement by and among Cole Operating Partnership V, LP, the operating partnership of CCPT V, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, and the lender parties thereto (the “CCPT V Credit Agreement”), including as guarantor under a guaranty provided by CCPT V. The CCPT V Credit Agreement allows for borrowings of up to $350.0 million (the “CCPT V Credit Facility,” and together with the CMFT Credit Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). The CCPT V Credit Facility includes $220.0 million in term loans (the “CCPT V Term Loans,” and together with the CMFT Term Loan, the “Term Loans”) and up to $130.0 million in revolving loans (the “CCPT V Revolving Loans,” and together with the CMFT Revolving Loans, the “Revolving Loans”). As of December 31, 2020, we had $480.0 million in unused capacity under the Credit Facilities, subject to borrowing availability. We had available borrowings of $135.5 million as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, we also had cash and cash equivalents of $121.4 million, which included $41.0 million of unsettled broadly syndicated loan purchases.
As of December 31, 2020, CMFT Corporate Credit Securities, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, had a revolving credit and security agreement with Citibank N.A. (“Citibank”), as administrative agent (the “Credit and Security Agreement”) that provided for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount up to $500.0 million (the “Credit Securities Revolver”), which may be increased from time to time pursuant to the Credit and Security Agreement. Borrowings under the Credit and Security Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets held by CMFT Corporate Credit Securities, LLC, which shall primarily consist of broadly-syndicated senior secured loans subject to certain eligibility criteria under the Credit and Security Agreement. As of December 31, 2020, the amounts borrowed and outstanding under the Credit Securities Revolver totaled $231.5 million.
As of December 31, 2020, CMFT RE Lending RF Sub CB, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, had a Master Repurchase Agreement with Citibank (the “Citibank Repurchase Agreement”), which provided up to $300.0 million of financing primarily through Citibank’s purchase of our CRE mortgage loans and future funding advances (the “Citibank Repurchase Facility”). Additionally, on September 21, 2020, CMFT RE Lending RF Sub BB, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned
66

Table of Contents

subsidiary, entered into a second Master Repurchase Agreement with Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) (the “Barclays Repurchase Agreement”), which provided up to $500.0 million of financing primarily through Barclays’ purchase of the our CRE mortgage loans and future funding advances (the “Barclays Repurchase Facility”, and collectively with the Citibank Repurchase Facility, the “Repurchase Facilities”). The Citibank Repurchase Agreement and the Barclays Repurchase Agreement provide for simultaneous agreements by Citibank and Barclays to re-sell such purchased CRE mortgage loans back to CMFT RE Lending RF Sub CB, LLC and CMFT RE Lending RF Sub BB, LLC at a certain future date or upon demand. As of December 31, 2020, we had four senior loans with an aggregate carrying value of $341.5 million financed with $235.4 million under the Repurchase Facilities, $109.1 million of which was financed under the Barclays Repurchase Facility and $126.3 million of which was financed under the Citibank Repurchase Facility.
As of December 31, 2020, we believe that we were in compliance with the financial covenants of our second amended and restated unsecured credit agreement (the “Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), the CCPT V Credit Agreement the Citibank Repurchase Agreement and the Barclays Repurchase Agreement, as well as the financial covenants under our various fixed and variable rate debt agreements, with the exception of one mortgage note, as further discussed in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements.
Short-term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a short-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for the acquisition of real estate-related securities, real estate and real estate-related assets and the payment of acquisition-related fees and expenses, operating expenses, distributions, redemptions and interest and principal on current and any future debt financings, including principal repayments of $138.2 million within the next 12 months. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through cash proceeds from real estate asset dispositions, net cash provided by operations directly. These include: overall economic activity and employment growth,proceeds from the Secondary DRIP Offering, as well as secured or unsecured borrowings from banks and other lenders to finance our future acquisitions and loan originations. Operating cash flows are expected to increase as we complete future acquisitions. We believe that the resources stated above will be sufficient to satisfy our operating requirements for the foreseeable future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from sources other than those described above within the next 12 months. Management intends to use the proceeds from the disposition of properties to, among other things, acquire additional high-quality net-lease properties and credit investments in furtherance of our investment objectives and for other general corporate purposes.
Long-term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a long-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for the acquisition of real estate-related securities, real estate and real estate-related assets and the payment of tenant improvements, acquisition-related fees and expenses, operating expenses, distributions and redemptions to stockholders and interest and principal on any current and future indebtedness. Generally, we expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through proceeds from cash flows from operations, borrowings on the Credit Facilities, proceeds from secured or unsecured borrowings from banks and other lenders, and proceeds raised pursuant to the Secondary DRIP Offering.
We expect that substantially all net cash flows from operations will be used to pay distributions to our stockholders after certain capital expenditures, including tenant improvements and leasing commissions, are paid; however, we have used, and may continue to use, other sources to fund distributions, as necessary, including borrowings on the Credit Facilities and/or future borrowings on our unencumbered assets. To the extent that cash flows from operations are lower due to fewer properties being acquired or lower than expected returns on the properties, distributions paid to our stockholders may be lower. We expect that substantially all net cash flows from the Offerings or debt financings will be used to fund acquisitions, loan originations, certain capital expenditures, repayments of outstanding debt or distributions and redemptions to our stockholders.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2020, we had debt outstanding with a carrying value of $2.1 billion and a weighted average interest rate levels,of 3.4%. See Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for certain terms of our debt outstanding.
67

Table of Contents

Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2020 were as follows (in thousands):
Payments due by period (1)
TotalLess Than 1
Year
1-3 Years3-5 YearsMore Than
5 Years
Principal payments — fixed rate debt (2)
$578,096 $138,210 $348,794 $91,092 $— 
Interest payments — fixed rate debt (3)
48,040 20,328 25,999 1,713 — 
Principal payments — credit facilities (4)
1,336,500 — 1,105,000 231,500 — 
Interest payments — credit facilities (4)
67,548 45,900 17,237 4,411 — 
Principal payments — repurchase facilities (5)
235,380 — 235,380 — — 
Interest payments — repurchase facilities (5)
15,530 6,052 9,478 — — 
Total$2,281,094 $210,490 $1,741,888 $328,716 $— 

(1)The table does not include amounts due to CMFT Management or its affiliates pursuant to our Management Agreement because such amounts are not fixed and determinable.
(2)Principal payment amounts reflect actual payments based on the costface amount of notes payable secured by our wholly-owned properties, which excludes the fair value adjustment, net of amortization, of mortgage notes assumed of $149,000 as of December 31, 2020.
(3)As of December 31, 2020, we had $53.6 million of variable rate debt effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the effective interest rates fixed under our interest rate swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(4)As of December 31, 2020, the Term Loans outstanding totaled $1.1 billion, $1.0 billion of which is subject to interest rate swap agreements (the “Swapped Term Loans”). As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average all-in interest rate for the Swapped Term Loans was 3.9%. The remaining $73.3 million outstanding under the Credit Facilities had a weighted average interest rate of 1.9% as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the amounts outstanding under the Credit Securities Revolver (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and availabilityRepurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) totaled $231.5 million and had a weighted average interest rate of 1.9%.
(5)As of December 31, 2020, the amount outstanding under the Citibank Repurchase Facility (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) was $126.3 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.3%, and the amount outstanding under the Barclays Repurchase Facility (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) was $109.1 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.9%.
We expect to incur additional borrowings in the future to acquire additional properties and other real estate-related assets. There is no limitation on the amount we may borrow against any single improved property. As of December 31, 2020, our ratio of debt to total gross assets net of gross intangible lease liabilities was 46.2% and our ratio of debt to the fair market value of our gross assets net of gross intangible lease liabilities was 45.8%. Fair market value is based on the estimated market value of our real estate assets as of June 30, 2020 that were used to determine our estimated per share NAV, and for those assets acquired from July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 is based on the purchase price.
Our management reviews net debt as part of its management of our overall liquidity, financial flexibility, capital structure and leverage, and we therefore believe that the presentation of net debt provides useful information to stockholders. Net debt is a non-GAAP measure used to show our outstanding principal debt balance, excluding certain GAAP adjustments, such as premiums or discounts, financing and issuance costs, and related accumulated amortization, less all cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2020, our net debt leverage ratio, which is the ratio of net debt to total gross real estate and related assets net of gross intangible lease liabilities, was 43.6%.
68

Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of the notes payable and credit facility, net balance, as reported on our consolidated balance sheet, to net debt as of December 31, 2020 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Balance as of
December 31, 2020
Credit facilities, notes payable and repurchase facilities, net$2,144,993 
Deferred costs and net premiums (1)
4,983 
Less: Cash and cash equivalents(121,385)
Net debt$2,028,591 
Gross real estate and related assets, net (2)
$4,649,426 
Net debt leverage ratio43.6 %
______________________
(1) Deferred costs relate to mortgage notes payable and the term portion of the Credit Facilities.
(2) Net of gross intangible lease liabilities. Includes gross assets held for sale, as well as real estate-related securities and loans held-for-investment principal balance, net of allowance for credit losses, of $949.1 million.
Cash Flow Analysis
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $82.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The change was primarily due to lower net income after non-cash adjustments due to the disposition of 30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, and the disposition of 497 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019. See “— Results of Operations” for a more complete discussion of the factors impacting our operating performance.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $466.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019. The change was primarily due to a decrease in net proceeds from disposition of real estate assets of $1.1 billion resulting from the disposal of 30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the disposal of 497 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease was also due to the net investment in broadly syndicated loans and real estate-related securities of $614.1 million, partially offset by net proceeds from the sale of loans held-for investments of $80.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $910.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The change was primarily due to an increase in net proceeds on the credit facilities, notes payable and repurchase facilities of $871.5 million as a result of entering into the Credit Securities Revolver and the Repurchase Facilities (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and the repayment of debt obligations as part of the Mergers during the year ended December 31, 2020, coupled with decreases in distributions to stockholders and redemptions of common stock resulting from the Board’s suspension of the Amended Share Redemption Program.
Election as a REIT
We elected to be taxed, and currently qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2012. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain requirements relating to our organization, sources of income, nature of assets, distributions of income to our stockholders and recordkeeping. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders so long as we distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains).
If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT for any reason in a taxable year and applicable relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We will not be able to deduct distributions paid to our stockholders in any year in which we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT. We also will be disqualified for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless we are entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. No provision for federal income taxes has been made in our accompanying consolidated
69


financial statements. We are subject to certain state and local taxes related to the operations of properties in certain locations, which have been provided for in our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Inflation
We are exposed to inflation risk as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are, and we expect that there will continue to be, provisions in many of our tenant leases that are intended to protect us from, and mitigate the risk of, the impact of taxinflation. These provisions include rent steps and regulatory policies.clauses enabling us to receive payment of additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales above pre-determined thresholds. In addition, most of our leases require the tenant to pay all or a majority of the property’s operating expenses, including real estate taxes, special assessments and sales and use taxes, utilities, insurance and building repairs. However, because of the long-term nature of leases for real property, such leases may not reset frequently enough to adequately offset the effects of inflation.
Related-Party Transactions and Agreements
We have entered into agreements with CMFT Management or its affiliates whereby we agree to pay certain fees to, or reimburse certain expenses of, CMFT Management or its affiliates such as acquisition and advisory fees and expenses, organization and offering costs, leasing fees and reimbursement of certain operating costs. See Note 12 — Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the various related-party transactions, agreements and fees.
Conflicts of Interest
Richard S. Ressler, the chairman of our Board, chief executive officer and president, who is also a founder and principal of CIM and is an officer/director of certain of its affiliates including CMFT Management, is the chairman of the board, chief executive officer and president of CIM Income NAV. One of our directors, Avraham Shemesh, who is also a founder and principal of CIM and is an officer/director of certain of its affiliates including CMFT Management, serves as a director of CIM Income NAV. One of our directors, Elaine Y. Wong, who is a principal of CIM, also serves as a director of CIM Income NAV. One of our independent directors, W. Brian Kretzmer, also serves as an independent director of CIM Income NAV. Nathan D. DeBacker, our chief financial officer and treasurer, who is also an officer of other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, is a vice president of CMFT Management and is an officer of certain of its affiliates. In addition, affiliates of CMFT Management act as an advisor to CIM Income NAV. As such, there may be conflicts of interest where CMFT Management or its affiliates, while serving in the capacity as sponsor, general partner, officer, director, key personnel and/or advisor for CIM or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CIM or CCO Group, including other real estate offerings in registration, may be in conflict with us in connection with providing services to other real estate-related programs related to property acquisitions, property dispositions, and property management, among others. The compensation arrangements between affiliates of CMFT Management and these other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group could influence the advice provided to us. See Part I, Item 1. Business — Conflicts of Interest of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements that had or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
70

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates
Our accounting policies have been established to conform with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Management believes that we have made these estimates and assumptions in an appropriate manner and in a way that accurately reflects our financial condition. We continually test and evaluate these estimates and assumptions using our historical knowledge of the business, as well as other factors, to ensure that they are reasonable for reporting purposes. However, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. We believe the following critical accounting policies govern the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements, which should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of our accounting policies and procedures included in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RecoverabilityGeneral and Administrative Expenses
The primary general and administrative expense items are certain expense reimbursements to our manager, banking fees and escrow and trustee fees.
63

Table of Real Estate AssetsContents

The increase in general and administrative expenses of $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, was primarily due to an increase in unused fees related to our credit facility, partially offset by a decrease in state franchise and income tax expenses.
Net Operating Income
Same store property net operating income decreased $7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The decrease was primarily due to reductions in rental and other property income of $3.8 million for amounts deemed not probable of collection at 39 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, overall same store occupancy was 93.2% as of December 31, 2020, compared to 95.0% as of December 31, 2019.
Non-same store property net operating income decreased $110.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The decrease is primarily due to the disposition of 497 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019 and the disposition of 30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, offset by recognizing a full period of net operating income for the one property acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019 and partial period of net operating income for the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Distributions
Prior to April 1, 2020, on a quarterly basis, our Board authorized a daily distribution for the succeeding quarter. Our Board authorized the following daily distribution amounts per share for the periods indicated below:
Period CommencingPeriod EndingDaily Distribution Amount
April 14, 2012December 31, 2012$0.001707848
January 1, 2013December 31, 2015$0.001712523
January 1, 2016December 31, 2016$0.001706776
January 1, 2017December 31, 2019$0.001711452
January 1, 2020March 31, 2020$0.001706776
On April 20, 2020, our Board decided to make a determination as to the amount and timing of distributions on a monthly, instead of a quarterly, basis until such time that we had greater visibility into the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic would have on our tenants’ ability to continue to pay rent on their leases on a timely basis or at all, the degree to which federal, state or local governmental authorities grant rent relief or other relief or amnesty programs applicable to our tenants, our ability to access the capital markets, and on the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. On March 25, 2021, the Board resumed declaring distributions on a quarterly basis by declaring a monthly per share distribution for the months of March, April, May and June of 2021. Since April of 2020, our Board authorized the following monthly distribution amounts per share for the periods indicated below:
64

Table of Contents

Record DateDistribution Amount
April 30, 2020$0.0130
May 31, 2020$0.0130
June 30, 2020$0.0161
July 30, 2020$0.0304
August 28, 2020$0.0303
September 29, 2020$0.0303
October 29, 2020$0.0303
November 27, 2020$0.0303
December 30, 2020$0.0303
January 28, 2021$0.0303
February 25, 2021$0.0303
March 29, 2021$0.0303
April 29 2021$0.0303
May 28, 2021$0.0303
June 29, 2021$0.0303
As of December 31, 2020, we had distributions payable of $11.0 million.
The following table presents distributions and source of distributions for the periods indicated below (dollar amounts in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
AmountPercentAmountPercent
Distributions paid in cash$90,655 73 %$112,083 58 %
Distributions reinvested34,191 27 %82,388 42 %
Total distributions$124,846 100 %$194,471 100 %
Source of distributions:
Net cash provided by operating activities (1)(2)
$115,985 93 %$194,471 100 %
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock8,308 (3)%— — %
Proceeds from the issuance of debt553 (4)— %— — %
Total sources$124,846 100 %$194,471 100 %

(1)Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $106.4 million and $188.6 million, respectively.
(2)Our distributions covered by cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include cash flows from operating activities in excess of distributions from prior periods of $9.6 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
(3)In accordance with GAAP, certain real estate acquisition-related fees and expenses, such as expenses and fees incurred in connection with property acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, are expensed, and therefore reduce net cash flows from operating activities. Therefore, for consistency, proceeds from the issuance of common stock used as a source of distributions for the year ended December 31, 2020 include the amount by which real estate acquisition-related fees and expenses have reduced net cash flows from operating activities in those prior periods.
(4)Net proceeds on the credit facilities and notes payable for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $159.0 million.
Share Redemptions
Our Amended Share Redemption Program permits our stockholders to sell their shares of common stock back to us, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Funding for the redemption of shares will be limited to the cumulative net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares under the Secondary DRIP Offering, net of shares redeemed to date. In addition, we will generally limit quarterly redemptions to approximately 1.25% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12-month period ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter for which the redemptions are being paid, and to the net
65


proceeds we receive from the sale of shares in the respective quarter under the Secondary DRIP Offering. Any of the foregoing limits might prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any fiscal quarter or in any 12-month period. In addition, our Board may choose to amend the terms of, suspend or terminate our Amended Share Redemption Program at any time in its sole discretion if it believes that such action is in the best interest of us and our stockholders. Any material modifications or suspension of the Amended Share Redemption Program will be disclosed to our stockholders as promptly as practicable in our reports filed with the SEC and via our website. In connection with the Mergers, our Board suspended our Amended Share Redemption Program on August 30, 2020, and therefore, no shares were redeemed from our stockholders after that date until the Amended Share Redemption Program was reinstated, effective April 1, 2021, by our Board on March 25, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we received valid redemption requests under our Amended Share Redemption Program totaling approximately 48.3 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 3.8 million shares as of December 31, 2020 for $28.5 million (at an average redemption price of $7.60 per share). The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 44.5 million shares went unfulfilled. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we received valid redemption requests under our share redemption program totaling approximately 88.6 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 7.2 million shares as of December 31, 2019 for $62.4 million (at an average redemption price of $8.65 per share) and approximately 2.3 million shares subsequent to December 31, 2019 for $19.5 million at an average redemption price of $8.65 per share. The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 79.1 million shares went unfulfilled. A valid redemption request is one that complies with the applicable requirements and guidelines of the share redemption program then in effect. The share redemptions were funded with proceeds from the Secondary DRIP Offering.
See the discussion of our Amended Share Redemption Program in Part II, Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Share Redemption Program in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
We expect to utilize proceeds from real estate dispositions, sales proceeds and principal payments received on credit investments, cash flows from operations and future proceeds from secured or unsecured financing to complete future acquisitions and for general corporate uses. The sources of our operating cash flows will primarily be provided by the rental and other property income received from current and future leased properties.
As of December 31, 2020, we had an unsecured credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “CMFT Credit Facility”) that provided for borrowings of up to $1.24 billion, which includes a $885.0 million unsecured term loan (the “CMFT Term Loan”) and up to $350.0 million in unsecured revolving loans (the “CMFT Revolving Loans”). During the year ended December 31, 2020, as a result of the Merger with CCPT V, we assumed CCPT V’s obligations pursuant to the credit agreement by and among Cole Operating Partnership V, LP, the operating partnership of CCPT V, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, and the lender parties thereto (the “CCPT V Credit Agreement”), including as guarantor under a guaranty provided by CCPT V. The CCPT V Credit Agreement allows for borrowings of up to $350.0 million (the “CCPT V Credit Facility,” and together with the CMFT Credit Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). The CCPT V Credit Facility includes $220.0 million in term loans (the “CCPT V Term Loans,” and together with the CMFT Term Loan, the “Term Loans”) and up to $130.0 million in revolving loans (the “CCPT V Revolving Loans,” and together with the CMFT Revolving Loans, the “Revolving Loans”). As of December 31, 2020, we had $480.0 million in unused capacity under the Credit Facilities, subject to borrowing availability. We had available borrowings of $135.5 million as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, we also had cash and cash equivalents of $121.4 million, which included $41.0 million of unsettled broadly syndicated loan purchases.
As of December 31, 2020, CMFT Corporate Credit Securities, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, had a revolving credit and security agreement with Citibank N.A. (“Citibank”), as administrative agent (the “Credit and Security Agreement”) that provided for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount up to $500.0 million (the “Credit Securities Revolver”), which may be increased from time to time pursuant to the Credit and Security Agreement. Borrowings under the Credit and Security Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets held by CMFT Corporate Credit Securities, LLC, which shall primarily consist of broadly-syndicated senior secured loans subject to certain eligibility criteria under the Credit and Security Agreement. As of December 31, 2020, the amounts borrowed and outstanding under the Credit Securities Revolver totaled $231.5 million.
As of December 31, 2020, CMFT RE Lending RF Sub CB, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, had a Master Repurchase Agreement with Citibank (the “Citibank Repurchase Agreement”), which provided up to $300.0 million of financing primarily through Citibank’s purchase of our CRE mortgage loans and future funding advances (the “Citibank Repurchase Facility”). Additionally, on September 21, 2020, CMFT RE Lending RF Sub BB, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned
66

Table of Contents

subsidiary, entered into a second Master Repurchase Agreement with Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) (the “Barclays Repurchase Agreement”), which provided up to $500.0 million of financing primarily through Barclays’ purchase of the our CRE mortgage loans and future funding advances (the “Barclays Repurchase Facility”, and collectively with the Citibank Repurchase Facility, the “Repurchase Facilities”). The Citibank Repurchase Agreement and the Barclays Repurchase Agreement provide for simultaneous agreements by Citibank and Barclays to re-sell such purchased CRE mortgage loans back to CMFT RE Lending RF Sub CB, LLC and CMFT RE Lending RF Sub BB, LLC at a certain future date or upon demand. As of December 31, 2020, we had four senior loans with an aggregate carrying value of $341.5 million financed with $235.4 million under the Repurchase Facilities, $109.1 million of which was financed under the Barclays Repurchase Facility and $126.3 million of which was financed under the Citibank Repurchase Facility.
As of December 31, 2020, we believe that we were in compliance with the financial covenants of our second amended and restated unsecured credit agreement (the “Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), the CCPT V Credit Agreement the Citibank Repurchase Agreement and the Barclays Repurchase Agreement, as well as the financial covenants under our various fixed and variable rate debt agreements, with the exception of one mortgage note, as further discussed in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements.
Short-term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a short-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for the acquisition of real estate-related securities, real estate and real estate-related assets and the payment of acquisition-related fees and expenses, operating expenses, distributions, redemptions and interest and principal on current and any future debt financings, including principal repayments of $138.2 million within the next 12 months. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through cash proceeds from real estate asset dispositions, net cash provided by operations and proceeds from the Secondary DRIP Offering, as well as secured or unsecured borrowings from banks and other lenders to finance our future acquisitions and loan originations. Operating cash flows are expected to increase as we complete future acquisitions. We believe that the resources stated above will be sufficient to satisfy our operating requirements for the foreseeable future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from sources other than those described above within the next 12 months. Management intends to use the proceeds from the disposition of properties to, among other things, acquire additional high-quality net-lease properties and credit investments in furtherance of our investment objectives and for other general corporate purposes.
Long-term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a long-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for the acquisition of real estate-related securities, real estate and real estate-related assets and the payment of tenant improvements, acquisition-related fees and expenses, operating expenses, distributions and redemptions to stockholders and interest and principal on any current and future indebtedness. Generally, we expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through proceeds from cash flows from operations, borrowings on the Credit Facilities, proceeds from secured or unsecured borrowings from banks and other lenders, and proceeds raised pursuant to the Secondary DRIP Offering.
We expect that substantially all net cash flows from operations will be used to pay distributions to our stockholders after certain capital expenditures, including tenant improvements and leasing commissions, are paid; however, we have used, and may continue to use, other sources to fund distributions, as necessary, including borrowings on the Credit Facilities and/or future borrowings on our unencumbered assets. To the extent that cash flows from operations are lower due to fewer properties being acquired or lower than expected returns on the properties, distributions paid to our stockholders may be lower. We expect that substantially all net cash flows from the Offerings or debt financings will be used to fund acquisitions, loan originations, certain capital expenditures, repayments of outstanding debt or distributions and redemptions to our stockholders.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2020, we had debt outstanding with a carrying value of $2.1 billion and a weighted average interest rate of 3.4%. See Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for certain terms of our debt outstanding.
67

Table of Contents

Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2020 were as follows (in thousands):
Payments due by period (1)
TotalLess Than 1
Year
1-3 Years3-5 YearsMore Than
5 Years
Principal payments — fixed rate debt (2)
$578,096 $138,210 $348,794 $91,092 $— 
Interest payments — fixed rate debt (3)
48,040 20,328 25,999 1,713 — 
Principal payments — credit facilities (4)
1,336,500 — 1,105,000 231,500 — 
Interest payments — credit facilities (4)
67,548 45,900 17,237 4,411 — 
Principal payments — repurchase facilities (5)
235,380 — 235,380 — — 
Interest payments — repurchase facilities (5)
15,530 6,052 9,478 — — 
Total$2,281,094 $210,490 $1,741,888 $328,716 $— 

(1)The table does not include amounts due to CMFT Management or its affiliates pursuant to our Management Agreement because such amounts are not fixed and determinable.
(2)Principal payment amounts reflect actual payments based on the face amount of notes payable secured by our wholly-owned properties, which excludes the fair value adjustment, net of amortization, of mortgage notes assumed of $149,000 as of December 31, 2020.
(3)As of December 31, 2020, we had $53.6 million of variable rate debt effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the effective interest rates fixed under our interest rate swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(4)As of December 31, 2020, the Term Loans outstanding totaled $1.1 billion, $1.0 billion of which is subject to interest rate swap agreements (the “Swapped Term Loans”). As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average all-in interest rate for the Swapped Term Loans was 3.9%. The remaining $73.3 million outstanding under the Credit Facilities had a weighted average interest rate of 1.9% as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the amounts outstanding under the Credit Securities Revolver (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) totaled $231.5 million and had a weighted average interest rate of 1.9%.
(5)As of December 31, 2020, the amount outstanding under the Citibank Repurchase Facility (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) was $126.3 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.3%, and the amount outstanding under the Barclays Repurchase Facility (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) was $109.1 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.9%.
We expect to incur additional borrowings in the future to acquire additional properties and other real estate-related assets. There is no limitation on the amount we may borrow against any single improved property. As of December 31, 2020, our ratio of debt to total gross assets net of gross intangible lease liabilities was 46.2% and our ratio of debt to the fair market value of our gross assets net of gross intangible lease liabilities was 45.8%. Fair market value is based on the estimated market value of our real estate assets as of June 30, 2020 that were used to determine our estimated per share NAV, and subsequently monitorfor those assets quarterlyacquired from July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 is based on the purchase price.
Our management reviews net debt as part of its management of our overall liquidity, financial flexibility, capital structure and leverage, and we therefore believe that the presentation of net debt provides useful information to stockholders. Net debt is a non-GAAP measure used to show our outstanding principal debt balance, excluding certain GAAP adjustments, such as premiums or discounts, financing and issuance costs, and related accumulated amortization, less all cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2020, our net debt leverage ratio, which is the ratio of net debt to total gross real estate and related assets net of gross intangible lease liabilities, was 43.6%.
68

Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of the notes payable and credit facility, net balance, as reported on our consolidated balance sheet, to net debt as of December 31, 2020 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Balance as of
December 31, 2020
Credit facilities, notes payable and repurchase facilities, net$2,144,993 
Deferred costs and net premiums (1)
4,983 
Less: Cash and cash equivalents(121,385)
Net debt$2,028,591 
Gross real estate and related assets, net (2)
$4,649,426 
Net debt leverage ratio43.6 %
______________________
(1) Deferred costs relate to mortgage notes payable and the term portion of the Credit Facilities.
(2) Net of gross intangible lease liabilities. Includes gross assets held for impairment, includingsale, as well as real estate-related securities and loans held-for-investment principal balance, net of allowance for credit losses, of $949.1 million.
Cash Flow Analysis
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $82.2 million for the reviewyear ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The change was primarily due to lower net income after non-cash adjustments due to the disposition of 30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, and the disposition of 497 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019. See “— Results of Operations” for a more complete discussion of the factors impacting our operating performance.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $466.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019. The change was primarily due to a decrease in net proceeds from disposition of real estate assets of $1.1 billion resulting from the disposal of 30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the disposal of 497 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease was also due to the net investment in broadly syndicated loans and real estate-related securities of $614.1 million, partially offset by net proceeds from the sale of loans held-for investments of $80.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $910.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The change was primarily due to an increase in net proceeds on the credit facilities, notes payable and repurchase facilities of $871.5 million as a result of entering into the Credit Securities Revolver and the Repurchase Facilities (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and the repayment of debt obligations as part of the Mergers during the year ended December 31, 2020, coupled with decreases in distributions to stockholders and redemptions of common stock resulting from the Board’s suspension of the Amended Share Redemption Program.
Election as a REIT
We elected to be taxed, and currently qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2012. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain requirements relating to our organization, sources of income, nature of assets, distributions of income to our stockholders and recordkeeping. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to direct financing leases, if applicable. Additionally,federal income tax on taxable income that we record depreciationdistribute to our stockholders so long as we distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and amortizationexcluding net capital gains).
If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT for any reason in a taxable year and applicable relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We will not be able to deduct distributions paid to our stockholders in any year in which we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT. We also will be disqualified for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless we are entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. No provision for federal income taxes has been made in our accompanying consolidated
69


financial statements. We are subject to certain state and local taxes related to the operations of properties in certain locations, which have been provided for in our assets. The risksaccompanying consolidated financial statements.
Inflation
We are exposed to inflation risk as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are, and uncertainties involvedwe expect that there will continue to be, provisions in applyingmany of our tenant leases that are intended to protect us from, and mitigate the principlesrisk of, the impact of inflation. These provisions include rent steps and clauses enabling us to receive payment of additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales above pre-determined thresholds. In addition, most of our leases require the tenant to pay all or a majority of the property’s operating expenses, including real estate taxes, special assessments and sales and use taxes, utilities, insurance and building repairs. However, because of the long-term nature of leases for real property, such leases may not reset frequently enough to adequately offset the effects of inflation.
Related-Party Transactions and Agreements
We have entered into agreements with CMFT Management or its affiliates whereby we agree to pay certain fees to, or reimburse certain expenses of, CMFT Management or its affiliates such as acquisition and advisory fees and expenses, organization and offering costs, leasing fees and reimbursement of certain operating costs. See Note 12 — Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the various related-party transactions, agreements and fees.
Conflicts of Interest
Richard S. Ressler, the chairman of our Board, chief executive officer and president, who is also a founder and principal of CIM and is an officer/director of certain of its affiliates including CMFT Management, is the chairman of the board, chief executive officer and president of CIM Income NAV. One of our directors, Avraham Shemesh, who is also a founder and principal of CIM and is an officer/director of certain of its affiliates including CMFT Management, serves as a director of CIM Income NAV. One of our directors, Elaine Y. Wong, who is a principal of CIM, also serves as a director of CIM Income NAV. One of our independent directors, W. Brian Kretzmer, also serves as an independent director of CIM Income NAV. Nathan D. DeBacker, our chief financial officer and treasurer, who is also an officer of other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group, is a vice president of CMFT Management and is an officer of certain of its affiliates. In addition, affiliates of CMFT Management act as an advisor to CIM Income NAV. As such, there may be conflicts of interest where CMFT Management or its affiliates, while serving in the capacity as sponsor, general partner, officer, director, key personnel and/or advisor for CIM or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CIM or CCO Group, including other real estate offerings in registration, may be in conflict with us in connection with providing services to other real estate-related programs related to property acquisitions, property dispositions, and property management, among others. The compensation arrangements between affiliates of CMFT Management and these other real estate assets include, butprograms sponsored or operated by CCO Group could influence the advice provided to us. See Part I, Item 1. Business — Conflicts of Interest of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements that had or are not limitedreasonably likely to the following:
The estimated useful lives of our depreciable assets affects the amount of depreciation and amortization recognizedhave a current or future effect on our assets;financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
70

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates
Our accounting policies have been established to conform with GAAP. The reviewpreparation of impairment indicators and subsequent determination of the undiscounted future cash flows could requirefinancial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to reduceuse judgment in the valueapplication of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and recognizeliabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Management believes that we have made these estimates and assumptions in an impairment loss;
The fair value of held for sale assets is estimated by management. This estimated value could resultappropriate manner and in a reductionway that accurately reflects our financial condition. We continually test and evaluate these estimates and assumptions using our historical knowledge of the carrying value of the asset; and
Changes in assumptions based onbusiness, as well as other factors, to ensure that they are reasonable for reporting purposes. However, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a materialdifferent presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact oncomparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. We believe the following critical accounting policies govern the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial results.
Allocationstatements, which should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
In connection with our acquisition of properties, we allocate the purchase price to the tangibleaccounting policies and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their respective estimated fair values. Tangible assets consist of land, buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements. Intangible assets consist of above- and below-market lease values and the value of in-place leases. Our purchase price allocations are developed utilizing third-party appraisal reports, industry standards and management experience. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to purchase price allocations include, but are not limited to, the following:
The value allocated to land, as opposed to buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements, affects the amount of depreciation expense we record. If more value is attributed to land, depreciation expense is lower than if more value is attributed to buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements;
Intangible lease assets and liabilities can be significantly affected by estimates including market rent, lease terms including renewal options at rental rates below estimated market rental rates, carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, and current market conditions and costs, including tenant improvement allowances and rent concessions; and
We determine whether any financing assumed is above- or below-market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar types of debt financing with similar maturities.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently issued accounting pronouncements are describedprocedures included in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

56



Operating Highlights and Key Performance Indicators
2017 Activity
Acquired 42 properties for an aggregate purchase price of $307.4 million.
Disposed of 15 properties, 14 retail properties and one industrial property, for an aggregate sales price of $100.6 million.
Entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement that increased the allowable borrowings and extended the maturity dates associated with the original amended and restated unsecured credit facility.
Total debt increased by $231.1 million, from $2.3 billion to $2.5 billion.
Portfolio Information
As of December 31, 2017, we owned 909 properties located in 45 states, the gross rentable square feet of which was 97.5% leased, including any month-to-month agreements, with a weighted average lease term remaining of 9.6 years. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we disposed of 15 properties, for an aggregate gross sales price of $100.6 million.
The following table shows the property statistics of our real estate assets, which exclude uncompleted development projects and any properties owned through unconsolidated joint ventures, as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Number of commercial properties909
 882
 871
Rentable square feet (in thousands) (1)
26,888
 26,548
 25,195
Percentage of rentable square feet leased97.5% 98.2% 98.5%
Percentage of investment-grade tenants (2)
33.9% 35.5% 35.1%

(1)Includes square feet of buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
(2) Investment-grade tenants are those with a credit rating of BBB- or higher by Standard & Poor’s or a credit rating of Baa3 or higher by Moody’s. The ratings may reflect those assigned by Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s to the lease guarantor or the parent company, as applicable. The weighted average credit rating is weighted based on annualized rental income and is for only those tenants rated by Standard & Poor’s.
The following table summarizes our real estate acquisition activity during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
  
 Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Commercial properties acquired (1)
42
 15
 111
Purchase price of acquired properties (in thousands) (1)
$307,385
 $216,652
 $615,846
Rentable square feet (in thousands) (1) (2)
1,407
 1,268
 3,417

(1)Excludes a property owned through the Unconsolidated Joint Venture that was consolidated during the year ended December 31, 2016 and a development project placed into service during 2015.
(2)Includes square feet of buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.

57



The following table shows the tenant diversification of our real estate portfolio, based on annualized rental income, as of December 31, 2017:
      2017 2017 Percentage of
  Total Leased Annualized Annualized 2017
  Number Square Feet Rental Income Rental Income Annualized
Tenant 
of Leases (1)
 
(in thousands) (2)
 (in thousands) 
per Square Foot (2)
 Rental Income
Walgreens - pharmacy 63
 923
 $22,608
 $24.49
 6%
Dollar General - discount store 170
 1,646
 16,661
 10.12
 4%
Family Dollar - discount store 33
 1,214
 14,925
 12.29
 4%
United Oil - gas and convenience 4
 72
 13,342
 185.31
 4%
Lowe’s - home and garden 15
 1,898
 13,256
 6.98
 4%
Academy Sports - sporting goods 8
 2,098
 13,211
 6.30
 4%
CVS - pharmacy 46
 576
 12,884
 22.37
 3%
PetSmart - pet supply 39
 753
 11,319
 15.03
 3%
LA Fitness - entertainment and recreation 11
 502
 9,110
 18.15
 2%
Dick's Sporting Goods - sporting goods 17
 774
 8,856
 11.44
 2%
Other 1,193
 15,755
 236,961
 15.04
 64%
  1,599
 26,211
 $373,133
 $14.24
 100%

(1)Includes leases which are master lease agreements.
(2)Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
The following table shows the tenant industry diversification of our real estate portfolio, based on annualized rental income, as of December 31, 2017:
      2017 2017 Percentage of
  Total Leased Annualized Annualized 2017
  Number Square Feet Rental Income Rental Income Annualized
Industry 
of Leases (1)
 
(in thousands) (2)
 (in thousands) 
per Square Foot (2)
 Rental Income
Discount store 297
 5,268
 $54,151
 $10.28
 15%
Pharmacy 112
 1,526
 36,011
 23.60
 10%
Sporting goods 38
 3,581
 32,277
 9.01
 9%
Home and garden 58
 3,341
 31,716
 9.49
 8%
Gas and convenience 36
 287
 27,246
 94.93
 7%
Grocery 55
 2,123
 26,831
 12.64
 7%
Restaurants - casual dining 123
 632
 18,621
 29.46
 5%
Pet supply 55
 963
 14,669
 15.23
 4%
Entertainment and recreation 28
 739
 14,182
 19.19
 4%
Apparel and jewelry 99
 838
 13,422
 16.02
 4%
Other 698
 6,913
 104,007
 15.05
 27%
  1,599
 26,211
 $373,133
 $14.24
 100%

(1)Includes leases which are master lease agreements.
(2)Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.


58



The following table shows the geographic diversification of our real estate portfolio, based on annualized rental income, as of December 31, 2017:
      2017 2017 Percentage of
  Total Rentable Annualized Annualized 2017
  Number of Square Feet Rental Income Rental Income Annualized
Location Properties 
(in thousands) (1)
 (in thousands) 
per Square Foot (1)
 Rental Income
California 77
 1,034
 $37,084
 $35.86
 10%
Texas 101
 2,024
 32,112
 15.87
 9%
Georgia 39
 2,273
 27,662
 12.17
 7%
Ohio 62
 2,123
 24,543
 11.56
 7%
Florida 59
 1,712
 20,679
 12.08
 6%
Alabama 66
 1,541
 19,129
 12.41
 5%
Illinois 26
 1,215
 15,613
 12.85
 4%
North Carolina 31
 1,182
 14,451
 12.23
 4%
New York 12
 372
 13,815
 37.14
 4%
Indiana 26
 1,045
 13,684
 13.09
 4%
Other 410
 12,367
 154,361
 12.48
 40%
  909
 26,888
 $373,133
 $13.88
 100%

(1)Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
The following table shows the property type diversification of our real estate portfolio, based on annualized rental income, as of December 31, 2017:
      2017 2017 Percentage of
  Total Rentable Annualized Annualized 2017
  Number of Square Feet Rental Income Rental Income Annualized
Property Type Properties 
(in thousands) (1)
 (in thousands) 
per Square Foot (1)
 Rental Income
Retail 831
 14,394
 $216,148
 $15.02
 58%
Anchored shopping centers 74
 10,841
 148,523
 13.70
 40%
Industrial and distribution 4
 1,653
 8,462
 5.12
 2%
  909
 26,888
 $373,133
 $13.88
 100%

(1)Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
Leases
Although there are variations in the specific terms of the leases of our properties, the following is a summary of the general structure of our current leases. Generally, the leases of the properties acquired provide for initial terms of ten or more years and
provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options, subject to generally the same terms and conditions as the initial lease term. Certain leases also provide that in the event we wish to sell the property subject to that lease, we first must offer the lessee the right to purchase the property on the same terms and conditions as any offer which we intend to accept for the sale of the property. The properties are generally leased under net leases pursuant to which the tenant bears responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance, while certain of the leases require us to maintain the roof, structure and parking areas of the building. Additionally, certain leases provide for increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. The leases of the properties provide for annual rental payments (payable in monthly installments) ranging from $6,000 to $8.0 million (average of $207,000). Certain leases provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases or increases in the consumer price index.

59



The following table shows lease expirations of our real estate portfolio, as of December 31, 2017, during each of the next ten years and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options:
      2017    
  Total Leased Annualized 2017 Percentage of
  Number Square Feet Rental Income Annualized 2017
  of Leases Expiring Expiring Rental Income Annualized
Year of Lease Expiration 
Expiring (1)
 
(in thousands) (2)
 (in thousands) 
per Square Foot (2)
 Rental Income
2018 118
 618
 $8,410
 $13.61
 2%
2019 151
 1,195
 17,657
 14.78
 5%
2020 152
 1,061
 16,551
 15.60
 5%
2021 134
 1,118
 16,655
 14.90
 4%
2022 131
 1,624
 19,300
 11.88
 5%
2023 135
 2,521
 33,870
 13.44
 9%
2024 92
 1,964
 26,655
 13.57
 7%
2025 64
 1,891
 21,688
 11.47
 6%
2026 76
 1,301
 19,272
 14.81
 5%
2027 86
 1,743
 19,556
 11.22
 5%
Thereafter 460
 11,175
 173,519
 15.53
 47%
  1,599
 26,211
 $373,133
 $14.24
 100%

(1)Includes leases which are master lease agreements.
(2)Includes square feet of the buildings on land parcels subject to ground leases.
The following table shows the economic metrics of our real estate assets as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
  2017 2016 2015
Economic Metrics      
Weighted-average lease term (in years) (1)
 9.6 9.9 10.9
Lease rollover (1)(2):
      
Annual average 4.2% 4.0% 3.2%
Maximum for a single year 5.2% 5.3% 4.8%

(1)Based on annualized rental income of our real estate portfolio as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
(2)Through the end of the next five years as of the respective reporting date.
Results of Operations
The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):

60



  Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. 2016 Increase (Decrease) 2016 vs. 2015 Increase (Decrease)
  2017 2016 2015  
Total revenues $424,095
 $407,451
 $367,731
 $16,644
 $39,720
General and administrative expenses $13,716
 $12,502
 $13,652
 $1,214
 $(1,150)
Property operating expenses $29,777
 $23,176
 $20,890
 $6,601
 $2,286
Real estate tax expenses $37,489
 $35,063
 $33,571
 $2,426
 $1,492
Advisory fees and expenses $44,072
 $41,926
 $36,225
 $2,146
 $5,701
Acquisition-related expenses $1,599
 $4,191
 $15,526
 $(2,592) $(11,335)
Depreciation and amortization $141,392
 $134,672
 $122,227
 $6,720
 $12,445
Impairment $2,855
 $6,737
 $1,440
 $(3,882) $5,297
Operating income $153,195
 $149,184
 $124,200
 $4,011
 $24,984
Interest expense and other, net $90,688
 $79,465
 $59,199
 $11,223
 $20,266
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate, net $17,044
 $2,907
 $(108) $14,137
 $3,015
Net income attributable to the Company $79,420
 $71,842
 $64,771
 $7,578
 $7,071
Revenue
Our revenues consist primarily of rental and other property income from net leased commercial properties. We also incur certain operating expenses that are subject to reimbursement by our tenants, which results in tenant reimbursement income.
2017 vs 2016 – The increase in revenue of $16.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily due to the acquisition of 42 rental income-producing properties subsequent to December 31, 2016 as well as recognizing a full year of revenue on 15 properties acquired in 2016. Rental income from net leased commercial properties accounted for 88% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 87% for the year ended December 31, 2016. We also incurred certain operating expenses subject to reimbursement by our tenants, which resulted in $52.2 million of tenant reimbursement income during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $51.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – The increase in revenue of $39.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily due to the acquisition of 15 rental income-producing properties subsequent to December 31, 2015 as well as recognizing a full year of revenue on 111 properties acquired in 2015. Rental income from net leased commercial properties accounted for 87% of total revenue for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. We also incurred certain operating expenses subject to reimbursement by our tenants, which resulted in $51.3 million of tenant reimbursement income during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $46.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.
General and Administrative Expenses
The primary general and administrative expense items are operatingcertain expense reimbursements to our advisor,manager, banking fees and escrow and trustee fees, state franchise and income taxes, office expenses and accounting fees.
2017 vs 2016
63

The increase in general and administrative expenses of $1.2$1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, was primarily due to an increase in unused fees related to our credit facility, partially offset by a decrease in state franchise and income tax expenses.
Net Operating Income
Same store property net operating income decreased $7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, as compared to the same period in 2016,2019. The decrease was primarily due to increasesreductions in operating expense reimbursements to our advisor, as well as increases in state franchiserental and other property income taxesof $3.8 million for amounts deemed not probable of collection at 39 properties during the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily as a result2020 due to the impact of the acquisitionCOVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, overall same store occupancy was 93.2% as of 42 rental income-producing properties subsequent to December 31, 20162020, compared to 95.0% as well as recognizing a full year of general and administrative expenses on 15 properties acquired in 2016.December 31, 2019.
2016 vs 2015 – The decrease in general and administrative expenses of $1.2Non-same store property net operating income decreased $110.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, as compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily due to decreases in state franchise and income taxes as a result of favorable tax planning strategies and lower franchise taxes due to a lower net book value on existing properties, as well as decreases in operating expense reimbursements to our advisor and lower professional fees incurred during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses such as property repairs, maintenance and property-related insurance include both reimbursable and non-reimbursable property expenses. We are reimbursed by tenants for certain property operating expenses in accordance with the respective lease agreements.

61



2017 vs 20162019. The increase in property operating expenses of $6.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, wasdecrease is primarily due to the acquisitiondisposition of 42 rental income-producing properties subsequent to December 31, 2016 as well as recognizing a full year of property operating expenses on 15 properties acquired in 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – The increase in property operating expenses of $2.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily due to the acquisition of 15 rental income-producing properties subsequent to December 31, 2015 as well as recognizing a full year of property operating expenses on 111 properties acquired in 2015.
Real Estate Tax Expenses
2017 vs 2016 – The increase in real estate tax expenses of $2.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily due to the acquisition of 42 rental income-producing497 properties during the year ended December 31, 2017, as well as recognizing a full year2019 and the disposition of real estate tax expense on 15 properties acquired in 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – The increase in real estate tax expenses of $1.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily due to the acquisition of 15 rental income-producing30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2016, as well as2020, offset by recognizing a full yearperiod of real estate tax expense on 111 propertiesnet operating income for the one property acquired in 2015.
Advisory Fees and Expenses
Pursuant to the advisory agreement with CR IV Advisors and based upon the amount of our current invested assets, we are required to pay to CR IV Advisors a monthly advisory fee equal to one-twelfth of 0.75% of the average invested assets up to $2.0 billion, one-twelfth of 0.70% of the average invested assets over $2.0 billion up to $4.0 billion and one-twelfth of 0.65% of assets over $4.0 billion. Additionally, we may be required to reimburse certain expenses incurred by CR IV Advisors in providing such advisory services, subject to limitations as set forth in the advisory agreement.
2017 vs 2016 – The increase in advisory fees and expenses of $2.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same2019 and partial period in 2016, was primarily due to an increase in our average invested assets to $5.5 billionof net operating income for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $5.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – The increase in advisory fees and expenses of $5.7 millionproperties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily due to an increase in our average invested assets to $5.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $4.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015.2020.
Acquisition-Related Expenses
We reimburse CR IV Advisors or its affiliates for acquisition-related expenses incurred in the process of acquiring a property or the origination or acquisition of a loan, so long as the total acquisition fees and expenses relating to the transaction do not exceed 6.0% of the contract purchase price, unless otherwise approved by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, as commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to us. In April 2017, we early adopted ASU 2017-01, which clarifies the definition of a business by adding guidance to assist entities in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Beginning in April 2017, our acquisitions qualify as asset acquisitions, and as such, acquisition-related fees and certain acquisition-related expenses related to these asset acquisitions are capitalized. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01 in April 2017, costs related to property acquisitions, including acquisition fees described below, were expensed as incurred, and all of our acquisitions were accounted for as business combinations. Distributions
Prior to April 2017, acquisition-related expenses primarily consisted of legal, deed transfer and other costs related1, 2020, on a quarterly basis, our Board authorized a daily distribution for the succeeding quarter. Our Board authorized the following daily distribution amounts per share for the periods indicated below:
Period CommencingPeriod EndingDaily Distribution Amount
April 14, 2012December 31, 2012$0.001707848
January 1, 2013December 31, 2015$0.001712523
January 1, 2016December 31, 2016$0.001706776
January 1, 2017December 31, 2019$0.001711452
January 1, 2020March 31, 2020$0.001706776
On April 20, 2020, our Board decided to real estate purchase transactions, including costs incurred for deals that were not consummated. We also pay CR IV Advisors or its affiliates acquisition fees of upmake a determination as to 2.0% of: (1) the contract purchase price of each property or asset we acquire; (2) the amount paid in respectand timing of distributions on a monthly, instead of a quarterly, basis until such time that we had greater visibility into the development, constructionimpact that the COVID-19 pandemic would have on our tenants’ ability to continue to pay rent on their leases on a timely basis or improvementat all, the degree to which federal, state or local governmental authorities grant rent relief or other relief or amnesty programs applicable to our tenants, our ability to access the capital markets, and on the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. On March 25, 2021, the Board resumed declaring distributions on a quarterly basis by declaring a monthly per share distribution for the months of each asset we acquire; (3)March, April, May and June of 2021. Since April of 2020, our Board authorized the purchase price of any loan we acquire; and (4)following monthly distribution amounts per share for the principal amount of any loan we originate.
2017 vs 2016 – The decrease in acquisition-related expenses of $2.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily due to the acquisition of four commercial properties prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, for an aggregate purchase price of $55.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the acquisition of 15 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $216.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2016, acquisition-related costs related to property acquisitions were expensed as incurred.
2016 vs 2015 – The decrease in acquisition-related expenses of $11.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily due to the acquisition of 15 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $216.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the acquisition of 111 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $615.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.

periods indicated below:
62
64

Table of Contents



Record DateDistribution Amount
April 30, 2020$0.0130
May 31, 2020$0.0130
June 30, 2020$0.0161
July 30, 2020$0.0304
August 28, 2020$0.0303
September 29, 2020$0.0303
October 29, 2020$0.0303
November 27, 2020$0.0303
December 30, 2020$0.0303
January 28, 2021$0.0303
February 25, 2021$0.0303
March 29, 2021$0.0303
April 29 2021$0.0303
May 28, 2021$0.0303
June 29, 2021$0.0303
Depreciation and Amortization
2017 vs 2016 – The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses of $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily due to the acquisition of 42 additional rental income-producing properties subsequent to December 31, 2016 as well as recognizing a full year of depreciation and amortization expenses on 15 properties acquired in 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses of $12.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily due to the acquisition of 15 additional rental income-producing properties subsequent to December 31, 2015 as well as recognizing a full year of depreciation and amortization expenses on 111 properties acquired in 2015.
Impairment
2017 vs 2016 — The decrease in impairments of $3.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was due to four properties that were deemed to be impaired, resulting in impairment charges of $2.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to three properties that were deemed to be impaired, resulting in impairment charges of $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.
2016 vs 2015 — The increase in impairments of $5.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, was due to three properties that were deemed to be impaired, resulting in impairment charges of $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to one property that was deemed to be impaired, resulting in impairment charges of $1.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Interest Expense and Other, Net
Interest expense and other, net also includes amortization of deferred financing costs.
2017 vs 2016 – The increase in interest expense and other, net of $11.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily due to an increase in the average aggregate amount of debt outstanding from $2.2 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016 to $2.4 billion during the year ended December 31, 2017.
2016 vs 2015 – The increase in interest expense and other, net of $20.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, was primarily due to an increase in the average aggregate amount of debt outstanding from $1.8 billion during the year ended December 31, 2015 to $2.2 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Real Estate, Net
2017 vs 2016 – The increase in gain (loss) on disposition real estate, net of $14.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016 was due to the disposition of 15 properties for a gain of $17.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the the disposition of five properties for a gain of $2.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.
2016 vs 2015 – The increase in gain (loss) on disposition real estate, net of $3.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015 was due to the disposition of five properties for a gain of $2.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the the disposition of one undeveloped land parcel for a loss of $108,000 during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Same Store Properties
We review our stabilized operating results, measured by contract rental revenue, from properties that we owned for the entirety of both the current and prior year reporting periods, referred to as “same store” properties. Contract rental revenue is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure of real estate companies’ operating performance. Contract rental revenue is considered by management to be a helpful supplemental performance measure, as it provides a consistent method for the comparison of our properties. In determining the same store property pool, we include all properties that were owned for the entirety of both the current and prior reporting periods, except for properties during the current or prior year that were under development or redevelopment.
“Non-same store” properties, as reflected in the table below, includes properties acquired on or after January 1, 2016 and any properties under development or redevelopment. As shown in the table below, contract rental revenue on the 850 same store properties for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased approximately $2.6 million to $324.8 million, compared to $327.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Tenant bankruptcies at 14 same store properties accounted for $2.6

63



million of the net decrease in contract rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017. The same store properties were 97.4% occupied as of December 31, 2017 and 98.2% occupied as2020, we had distributions payable of December 31, 2016. $11.0 million.
The following table showspresents distributions and source of distributions for the contract rental revenue from properties owned for both of the entire years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, along with a reconciliation to rental income, calculated in accordance with GAAPperiods indicated below (dollar amounts in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
AmountPercentAmountPercent
Distributions paid in cash$90,655 73 %$112,083 58 %
Distributions reinvested34,191 27 %82,388 42 %
Total distributions$124,846 100 %$194,471 100 %
Source of distributions:
Net cash provided by operating activities (1)(2)
$115,985 93 %$194,471 100 %
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock8,308 (3)%— — %
Proceeds from the issuance of debt553 (4)— %— — %
Total sources$124,846 100 %$194,471 100 %
    Number of Properties Year Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)
   2017 2016 $ Change % Change
Rental income – as reported   $371,929
 $356,126
 $15,803
 4 %
Less: Amortization (1)
   2,138
 1,123
 1,015
 90 %
Less: Straight-line rental income   10,082
 11,555
 (1,473) (13)%
Total contract rental revenue   359,709
 343,448
 16,261
 5 %
           
Less: “Non-same store” properties 44 31,257
 9,116
 22,141
 243 %
Less: Disposed properties (2)
 15 3,685
 6,951
 (3,266) (47)%
“Same store” properties 850 $324,767
 $327,381
 $(2,614) (0.8)%

(1) Includes amortization of above- and below-market lease intangibles and deferred lease incentives.
(2) We disposed of 15 properties during the year ended December 31, 2017.
“Non-same store” properties, as reflected in the table below, includes properties acquired on or after January 1, 2015 and any properties under development or redevelopment. As shown in the table below, contract rental revenue on the 753 same store properties for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased approximately $658,000 to $282.5 million, compared to $281.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The same store properties were 97.9% occupied as of December 31, 2016 and 97.8% occupied as of December 31, 2015. The following table shows the contract rental revenue from properties owned for both of the entire years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, along with a reconciliation to rental income, calculated in accordance with GAAP (dollar amounts in thousands):
    Number of Properties Year Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)
   2016 2015 $ Change % Change
Rental income – as reported   $356,126
 $321,425
 $34,701
 11 %
Less: Amortization (1)
   1,123
 1,098
 25
 2 %
Less: Straight-line rental income   11,555
 11,776
 (221) (2)%
Total contract rental revenue   343,448
 308,551
 34,897
 11 %
           
Less: “Non-same store” properties 129 59,700
 24,634
 35,066
 142 %
Less: Disposed properties (2)
 5 1,287
 2,114
 (827) (39)%
“Same store” properties 753 $282,461
 $281,803
 $658
 0.2 %

(1) Includes amortization of above- and below-market lease intangibles and deferred lease incentives.
(2) We disposed of five properties during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Distributions
Our board of directors authorized a daily distribution, based on 365 days in the calendar year, of $0.001711452 per share for stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing on January 1, 2017 and ending on June 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, we had distributions payable of $16.5 million.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we paid distributions of $194.7 million and $194.9 million, respectively, including $101.3 million and $109.2 million, respectively, through the issuance of shares pursuant to the DRIP Offerings. Net cash provided by operating activities for the yearyears ended December 31, 20172020 and 2019 was $198.9$106.4 million and reflected a reduction$188.6 million, respectively.
(2)Our distributions covered by cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include cash flows from operating activities in excess of distributions from prior periods of $9.6 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
(3)In accordance with GAAP, certain real estate acquisition-related fees and expenses, such as expenses and fees incurred in connection with property acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, are expensed, and therefore reduce net cash flows from operating activities. Therefore, for consistency, proceeds from the issuance of $1.6 million in accordance with GAAP. Forcommon stock used as a source of distributions for the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided2020 include the amount by operating activities was $192.3 million and reflected a reduction forwhich real estate acquisition-related fees and expenses incurred of $4.2 millionhave reduced net cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP. Our distributions paid duringthose prior periods.
(4)Net proceeds on the credit facilities and notes payable for the year ended December 31, 2017, including shares issued pursuant to the DRIP Offerings, were fully funded by net cash provided by operating activities. Our 2016 distributions were funded by net cash provided by operating activities of $192.3 million, or 99%, and proceeds from the issuance of notes payable of $2.6 million, or 1%.2020 was $159.0 million.

64


Share Redemptions
Our share redemption programAmended Share Redemption Program permits our stockholders to sell their shares of common stock back to us, subject to certain conditions and limitations. We will not redeem in excess of 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12 months prior to the end of the fiscal quarter for which the redemptions are being paid. Funding for the redemption of shares will be limited to the cumulative net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares under the Secondary DRIP Offering, net of shares redeemed to date. In addition, we will generally limit quarterly redemptions to approximately 1.25% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12-month period ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter for which the redemptions are being paid, and to the net
65


proceeds we receive from the sale of shares in the respective quarter under the Secondary DRIP Offering. Any of the foregoing limits might prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any fiscal quarter or in any 12-month period. We received redemption requestsIn addition, our Board may choose to amend the terms of, approximately 11.1 million shares for $111.9 millionsuspend or terminate our Amended Share Redemption Program at any time in excessits sole discretion if it believes that such action is in the best interest of us and our stockholders. Any material modifications or suspension of the net proceeds we receivedAmended Share Redemption Program will be disclosed to our stockholders as promptly as practicable in our reports filed with the SEC and via our website. In connection with the Mergers, our Board suspended our Amended Share Redemption Program on August 30, 2020, and therefore, no shares were redeemed from our stockholders after that date until the issuance of shares under the Secondary DRIP Offering during the three months ended December 31, 2017. Management, in its discretion, limited the amount of shares redeemed for the three months ended December 31, 2017 to an amount equal to net proceeds we received from the sale of shares pursuant to the Secondary DRIP Offering during the respective period.Amended Share Redemption Program was reinstated, effective April 1, 2021, by our Board on March 25, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we received valid redemption requests under our Amended Share Redemption Program totaling approximately 48.3 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 3.8 million shares as of December 31, 2020 for $28.5 million (at an average redemption price of $7.60 per share). The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 44.5 million shares went unfulfilled. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we received valid redemption requests under our share redemption program totaling approximately 44.288.6 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 7.67.2 million shares as of December 31, 20172019 for $76.6$62.4 million (at an average redemption price of $10.08$8.65 per share) and approximately 2.42.3 million shares subsequent to December 31, 20172019 for $24.3$19.5 million at an average redemption price of $10.08$8.65 per share. The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 34.2 million shares went unfulfilled. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we received valid redemption requests under our share redemption program totaling approximately 14.9 million shares, of which we redeemed approximately 8.6 million shares as of December 31, 2016 for $83.1 million (at an average redemption price of $9.62 per share) and approximately 2.7 million shares subsequent to December 31, 2016 for $27.1 million (at an average redemption price of $9.91 per share). The remaining redemption requests relating to approximately 3.679.1 million shares went unfulfilled. A valid redemption request is one that complies with the applicable requirements and guidelines of our currentthe share redemption program.program then in effect. The share redemptions were funded with proceeds from the Secondary DRIP Offerings.Offering.
See the discussion of our share redemption programAmended Share Redemption Program in Part II, Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Share Redemption Program in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
We expect to utilize fundsproceeds from real estate dispositions, sales proceeds and principal payments received on credit investments, cash flowflows from operations and future proceeds from secured or unsecured financing to complete future property acquisitions and for general corporate uses. The sources of our operating cash flows will primarily be provided by the rental and other property income received from current and future leased properties.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had an unsecured credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Credit“CMFT Credit Facility”) that provided for borrowings of up to $1.40$1.24 billion, which includes a $1.05 billion$885.0 million unsecured term loan (the “Term“CMFT Term Loan”) and up to $350.0 million in unsecured revolving loans (the “CMFT Revolving Loans”). During the year ended December 31, 2020, as a result of the Merger with CCPT V, we assumed CCPT V’s obligations pursuant to the credit agreement by and among Cole Operating Partnership V, LP, the operating partnership of CCPT V, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, and the lender parties thereto (the “CCPT V Credit Agreement”), including as guarantor under a guaranty provided by CCPT V. The CCPT V Credit Agreement allows for borrowings of up to $350.0 million (the “CCPT V Credit Facility,” and together with the CMFT Credit Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). The CCPT V Credit Facility includes $220.0 million in term loans (the “CCPT V Term Loans,” and together with the CMFT Term Loan, the “Term Loans”) and up to $130.0 million in revolving loans (the “CCPT V Revolving Loans,” and together with the CMFT Revolving Loans, the “Revolving Loans”). As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $148.4$480.0 million in unused capacity under the Credit Facility,Facilities, subject to borrowing availability. We had available borrowings of $135.5 million as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we also had cash and cash equivalents of $4.7$121.4 million, which included $41.0 million of unsettled broadly syndicated loan purchases.
As of December 31, 2020, CMFT Corporate Credit Securities, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, had a revolving credit and security agreement with Citibank N.A. (“Citibank”), as administrative agent (the “Credit and Security Agreement”) that provided for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount up to $500.0 million (the “Credit Securities Revolver”), which may be increased from time to time pursuant to the Credit and Security Agreement. Borrowings under the Credit and Security Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets held by CMFT Corporate Credit Securities, LLC, which shall primarily consist of broadly-syndicated senior secured loans subject to certain eligibility criteria under the Credit and Security Agreement. As of December 31, 2020, the amounts borrowed and outstanding under the Credit Securities Revolver totaled $231.5 million.
As of December 31, 2020, CMFT RE Lending RF Sub CB, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, had a Master Repurchase Agreement with Citibank (the “Citibank Repurchase Agreement”), which provided up to $300.0 million of financing primarily through Citibank’s purchase of our CRE mortgage loans and future funding advances (the “Citibank Repurchase Facility”). Additionally, on September 21, 2020, CMFT RE Lending RF Sub BB, LLC, our indirect wholly-owned
66

Table of Contents

subsidiary, entered into a second Master Repurchase Agreement with Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) (the “Barclays Repurchase Agreement”), which provided up to $500.0 million of financing primarily through Barclays’ purchase of the our CRE mortgage loans and future funding advances (the “Barclays Repurchase Facility”, and collectively with the Citibank Repurchase Facility, the “Repurchase Facilities”). The Citibank Repurchase Agreement and the Barclays Repurchase Agreement provide for simultaneous agreements by Citibank and Barclays to re-sell such purchased CRE mortgage loans back to CMFT RE Lending RF Sub CB, LLC and CMFT RE Lending RF Sub BB, LLC at a certain future date or upon demand. As of December 31, 2020, we had four senior loans with an aggregate carrying value of $341.5 million financed with $235.4 million under the Repurchase Facilities, $109.1 million of which was financed under the Barclays Repurchase Facility and $126.3 million of which was financed under the Citibank Repurchase Facility.
As of December 31, 2020, we believe that we were in compliance with the financial covenants of our second amended and restated unsecured credit agreement (the “Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), the CCPT V Credit Agreement the Citibank Repurchase Agreement and the Barclays Repurchase Agreement, as well as the financial covenants under our various fixed and variable rate debt agreements, with the exception of one mortgage note, as further discussed in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements.
Short-term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a short-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for the acquisition of real estate-related securities, real estate and real estate-related assets and the payment of acquisition-related fees and expenses, operating expenses, distributions, redemptions and interest and principal on current and any future debt financings, including principal repayments of $24.2$138.2 million within the next 12 months. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through cash proceeds from real estate asset dispositions, net cash provided by operations and proceeds from the Secondary DRIP Offering, as well as secured or unsecured borrowings from banks and other lenders to finance our future acquisitions.acquisitions and loan originations. Operating cash flows are expected to increase as additional properties are added to our portfolio. With respect to our debt maturing within the next year, we expect to use borrowings available under the Credit Facility or to enter into new financing arrangements in order to meet our debt obligations.complete future acquisitions. We believe that the resources stated above will be sufficient to satisfy our operating requirements for the foreseeable future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from sources other than those described above within the next 12 months.

65



properties to, among other things, acquire additional high-quality net-lease properties and credit investments in furtherance of our investment objectives and for other general corporate purposes.
Long-term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a long-term basis, our principal demands for funds will be for the acquisition of real estate-related securities, real estate and real estate-related assets and the payment of tenant improvements, acquisition-related fees and expenses, operating expenses, distributions and redemptions to stockholders and interest and principal on any current and future indebtedness. Generally, we expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through proceeds from cash flowflows from operations, borrowings on the Credit Facility,Facilities, proceeds from secured or unsecured borrowings from banks and other lenders, and proceeds raised pursuant to the Secondary DRIP Offering.
We expect that substantially all net cash flows from operations will be used to pay distributions to our stockholders after certain capital expenditures, including tenant improvements and leasing commissions, are paid; however, we have used, and may continue to use, other sources to fund distributions, as necessary, including borrowings on the Credit FacilityFacilities and/or future borrowings on our unencumbered assets. To the extent that cash flows from operations are lower due to fewer properties being acquired or lower than expected returns on the properties, distributions paid to our stockholders may be lower. We expect that substantially all net cash flows from the Offerings or debt financings will be used to fund acquisitions, loan originations, certain capital expenditures, repayments of outstanding debt or distributions and redemptions to our stockholders.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $2.5 billion of debt outstanding with a carrying value of $2.1 billion and a weighted average interest rate of 3.6%3.4%. See Note 79 Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Credit FacilityRepurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for certain terms of our debt outstanding.
67

Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20172020 were as follows (in thousands):
 
  
Payments due by period (1)
 
  
Total 
Less Than 1
Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
More Than
5 Years
Principal payments — fixed rate debt (2)
$1,217,377
 $24,211
 $362,514
 $143,067
 $687,585
Interest payments — fixed rate debt (3)
216,157
 47,389
 85,009
 60,463
 23,296
Principal payments — variable rate debt20,500
 
 20,500
 
 
Interest payments — variable rate debt (4)
2,030
 940
 1,090
 
 
Principal payments — credit facility1,251,000
 
 
 1,251,000
 
Interest payments — credit facility (5)
163,457
 40,360
 81,054
 42,043
 
Total$2,870,521
 $112,900
 $550,167
 $1,496,573
 $710,881
Payments due by period (1)
TotalLess Than 1
Year
1-3 Years3-5 YearsMore Than
5 Years
Principal payments — fixed rate debt (2)
$578,096 $138,210 $348,794 $91,092 $— 
Interest payments — fixed rate debt (3)
48,040 20,328 25,999 1,713 — 
Principal payments — credit facilities (4)
1,336,500 — 1,105,000 231,500 — 
Interest payments — credit facilities (4)
67,548 45,900 17,237 4,411 — 
Principal payments — repurchase facilities (5)
235,380 — 235,380 — — 
Interest payments — repurchase facilities (5)
15,530 6,052 9,478 — — 
Total$2,281,094 $210,490 $1,741,888 $328,716 $— 

(1)The table does not include amounts due to CR IV Advisors or its affiliates pursuant to our advisory agreement because such amounts are not fixed and determinable.
(2)Principal payment amounts reflect actual payments based on the face amount of notes payable secured by our wholly-owned properties, which excludes the fair value adjustment, net of amortization, of mortgage notes assumed of $419,000 as of December 31, 2017.
(3)As of December 31, 2017, we had $217.1 million of variable rate debt effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the effective interest rates fixed under our interest rate swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(4)As of December 31, 2017, we had variable rate debt outstanding of $20.5 million with a weighted average interest rate of 4.6%. We used the weighted average interest rate to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(5)As of December 31, 2017, the Term Loan outstanding totaled $1.05 billion, $811.7 million of which is subject to interest rate swap agreements. As of December 31, 2017, the weighted average all-in interest rate for the Swapped Term Loan was 3.2%. The remaining $439.3 million outstanding under the Credit Facility had a weighted average interest rate of 3.3% as of December 31, 2017.
(1)The table does not include amounts due to CMFT Management or its affiliates pursuant to our Management Agreement because such amounts are not fixed and determinable.
(2)Principal payment amounts reflect actual payments based on the face amount of notes payable secured by our wholly-owned properties, which excludes the fair value adjustment, net of amortization, of mortgage notes assumed of $149,000 as of December 31, 2020.
(3)As of December 31, 2020, we had $53.6 million of variable rate debt effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swap agreements. We used the effective interest rates fixed under our interest rate swap agreements to calculate the debt payment obligations in future periods.
(4)As of December 31, 2020, the Term Loans outstanding totaled $1.1 billion, $1.0 billion of which is subject to interest rate swap agreements (the “Swapped Term Loans”). As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average all-in interest rate for the Swapped Term Loans was 3.9%. The remaining $73.3 million outstanding under the Credit Facilities had a weighted average interest rate of 1.9% as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the amounts outstanding under the Credit Securities Revolver (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) totaled $231.5 million and had a weighted average interest rate of 1.9%.
(5)As of December 31, 2020, the amount outstanding under the Citibank Repurchase Facility (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) was $126.3 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.3%, and the amount outstanding under the Barclays Repurchase Facility (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) was $109.1 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.9%.
We expect to incur additional borrowings in the future to acquire additional properties and other real estate-related assets. There is no limitation on the amount we may borrow against any single improved property. Our borrowings will not exceed 75%As of the costDecember 31, 2020, our ratio of ourdebt to total gross assets (or 300%net of net assets) asgross intangible lease liabilities was 46.2% and our ratio of the date of any borrowing, which is the maximum level of indebtedness permitted under the NASAA REIT Guidelines; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors and discloseddebt to our stockholders in the next quarterly report along with justification for such excess borrowing. Our board of directors has adopted a policy to further limit our borrowings to 60% of the greater of cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) or fair market value of our gross assets unless excess borrowing is approved

66



by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in the next quarterly report along with the justification for such excess borrowing. Our advisor has set a target leverage ratio of 40% to 50% of the greater of cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) or fair market value of our gross assets.intangible lease liabilities was 45.8%. Fair market value is based on the estimated market value of our real estate assets as of December 31, 2016June 30, 2020 that were used to determine our estimated per share NAV, and for those assets acquired from JanuaryJuly 1, 20172020 through December 31, 2017,2020 is based on the purchase price. As of December 31, 2017, our ratio of debt to the cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) of our gross assets was 49.0%, and our ratio of debt to the fair market value of our gross assets was 44.3%.
Our management reviews net debt as part of its management of our overall liquidity, financial flexibility, capital structure and leverage, and we therefore believe that the presentation of net debt provides useful information to stockholders. Net debt is a non-GAAP measure used to show our outstanding principal debt balance, excluding certain GAAP adjustments, such as premiums or discounts, financing and issuance costs, and related accumulated amortization, less all cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2017,2020, our net debt leverage ratio, which is the ratio of net debt to total gross real estate and related assets net of gross intangible lease liabilities, was 48.9%43.6%.
68

Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of the notes payable and credit facility, net balance, as reported on our consolidated balance sheet, to net debt as of December 31, 20172020 (dollar amounts in thousands):
  Balance as of December 31, 2017
Notes payable and credit facility, net $2,471,763
Deferred costs and net premiums (1)
 17,114
Less: Cash and cash equivalents (4,745)
Net debt $2,484,132
   
Gross real estate assets, net (2)
 $5,077,620
Net debt leverage ratio 48.9%
Balance as of
December 31, 2020
Credit facilities, notes payable and repurchase facilities, net$2,144,993 
Deferred costs and net premiums (1)
4,983 
Less: Cash and cash equivalents(121,385)
Net debt$2,028,591 
Gross real estate and related assets, net (2)
$4,649,426 
Net debt leverage ratio43.6 %
______________________
(1) Deferred costs relate to mortgage notes payable and the term portion of the Credit Facility.Facilities.
(2) Net of gross intangible lease liabilities. Includes gross assets held for sale, as well as real estate-related securities and loans held-for-investment principal balance, net of allowance for credit losses, of $949.1 million.
Cash Flow Analysis
Year Ended December 31, 20172020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162019
Operating Activities. During the year ended December 31, 2017, net Net cash provided by operating activities increaseddecreased by $6.6 million to $198.9 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $192.3$82.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020, as compared to the same period in 2019. The change was primarily due to the acquisition of 42 properties subsequent to December 31, 2016, resulting in an increase inlower net income after non-cash adjustments for depreciation and amortization, net, of $13.3 million. Additionally, net cash provided by operating activities increased due to a net increase in working capital accountsthe disposition of $6.3 million, offset by an increase in gain on dispositions30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, and the disposition of real estate assets, net, of $14.1 million.497 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019. See “— Results of Operations” for a more complete discussion of the factors impacting our operating performance.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities increased by $35.7 million to $223.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $187.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of 42 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $307.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 15 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $216.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. Additionally, net cash used in investing activities increased due to a net increase in capital expenditures of $10.5 million, offset by the disposal of 15 properties for an aggregate gross sales price of $100.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the disposal of five properties for an aggregate gross sales price of $31.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $20.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $21.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase of net cash provided by financing activities of $41.8 million was primarily due to a increase in net proceeds from the borrowing facilities and notes payable of $51.1 million, offset by an increase in deferred financing costs paid of $9.9 million.
Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015
Operating Activities. During the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities increased by $9.4 million to $192.3 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $182.9 million for the year ended

67



December 31, 2015. The change was primarily due to an increase in adjustments in depreciation and amortization of $13.7 million, and an increase in net income of $7.1 million, partially offset by a decrease in net working capital accounts of $13.1 million. See “— Results of Operations” for a more complete discussion of the factors impacting our operating performance.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $485.3 million to $187.7$466.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, as compared to $673.0 millionnet cash provided by investing activities of $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015.2019. The decrease was primarily due to the acquisition of 15 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $216.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to 111 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $615.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, in addition to $66.1 million invested in a development project during the year ended December 31, 2015. In addition, proceeds from the disposition of real estate assets increased by $29.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.
Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities was $21.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $464.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease of net cash provided by financing activities of $486.2 millionchange was primarily due to a decrease in net proceeds from disposition of real estate assets of $1.1 billion resulting from the borrowing facilitiesdisposal of 30 properties during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the disposal of 497 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease was also due to the net investment in broadly syndicated loans and notes payablereal estate-related securities of $417.0 million. In addition, share redemptions increased$614.1 million, partially offset by $66.5net proceeds from the sale of loans held-for investments of $80.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to2020.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2020, as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $910.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The change was primarily due to an increase in net proceeds on the credit facilities, notes payable and repurchase facilities of $871.5 million as a result of entering into the Credit Securities Revolver and the Repurchase Facilities (as defined in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and the repayment of debt obligations as part of the Mergers during the year ended December 31, 2020, coupled with decreases in distributions to stockholders and redemptions of common stock resulting from the Board’s suspension of the Amended Share Redemption Program.
Election as a REIT
We elected to be taxed, and currently qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2012. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must continue to meet certain requirements relating to our organization, sources of income, nature of assets, distributions of income to our stockholders and recordkeeping. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders so long as we distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains).
If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT for any reason in a taxable year and applicable relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We will not be able to deduct distributions paid to our stockholders in any year in which we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT. We also will be disqualified for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless we are entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. No provision for federal income taxes has been made in our accompanying consolidated
69


financial statements. We are subject to certain state and local taxes related to the operations of properties in certain locations, which have been provided for in our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Inflation
We are exposed to inflation risk as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are, and we expect that there will continue to be, provisions in many of our tenant leases that are intended to protect us from, and mitigate the risk of, the impact of inflation. These provisions include rent steps and clauses enabling us to receive payment of additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales above pre-determined thresholds. In addition, most of our leases require the tenant to pay all or a majority of the property’s operating expenses, including real estate taxes, special assessments and sales and use taxes, utilities, insurance and building repairs. However, because of the long-term nature of leases for real property, such leases may not reset frequently enough to adequately offset the effects of inflation.
Related-Party Transactions and Agreements
We have entered into agreements with CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates whereby we agree to pay certain fees to, or reimburse certain expenses of, CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates such as acquisition and advisory fees and expenses, organization and offering costs, leasing fees and reimbursement of certain operating costs. See Note 11—12 — Related-Party Transactions and Arrangements to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the various related-party transactions, agreements and fees.

68



Conflicts of Interest
Richard S. Ressler, the chairman of our Board, chief executive officer president and one of our directors,president, who is also a founder and principal of CIM and is an officer/director of certain of its affiliates as wellincluding CMFT Management, is the chairman of the board, chief executive officer and president of CIM Income NAV. One of our directors, Avraham Shemesh, who is also a founder and principal of CIM and is an officer/director of certain of its affiliates including CMFT Management, serves as a director of CCIT III and ColeCIM Income NAV Strategy, andNAV. One of our directors, Elaine Y. Wong, who is a principal of CIM, also serves as a director of CIM Income NAV. One of our independent directors, W. Brian Kretzmer, also serves as an independent director of CIM Income NAV. Nathan D. DeBacker, our chief financial officer and treasurer, act as executive officers and/or a directorwho is also an officer of one or more other real estate programs sponsored by CCO Group. OneGroup, is a vice president of our directors, W. Brian Kretzmer, also serves as a directorCMFT Management and is an officer of CCIT III and Cole Income NAV Strategy.certain of its affiliates. In addition, affiliates of CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management act as an advisor to and our chief financial officer and one of our directors act as executive officers and/or a director of, CCPT V, CCIT II, CCIT III, ColeCIM Income NAV Strategy, and/or other real estate offerings in registration, all of which are or intend to be public, non-listed REITs offered, distributed and/or managed by affiliates of CR IV Advisors.NAV. As such, there aremay be conflicts of interest where CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates, while serving in the capacity as sponsor, general partner, officer, director, key personnel and/or advisor for CIM or another real estate program sponsored or operated by CIM or CCO Group, including other real estate offerings in registration, may be in conflict with us in connection with providing services to other real estate-related programs related to property acquisitions, property dispositions, and property management, among others. The compensation arrangements between affiliates of CR IV Advisors and CIMCMFT Management and these other real estate programs sponsored or operated by CCO Group could influence the advice provided to us. See Part I, Item 1. Business — Conflicts of Interest of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements that had or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
70

Table of Contents
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Accounting Estimates
Our accounting policies have been established to conform with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Management believes that we have made these estimates and assumptions in an appropriate manner and in a way that accurately reflects our financial condition. We continually test and evaluate these estimates and assumptions using our historical knowledge of the business, as well as other factors, to ensure that they are reasonable for reporting purposes. However, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. We believe the following critical accounting policies govern the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements, which should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of our accounting policies and procedures included in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Recoverability of Real Estate Assets
We acquire real estate assets and subsequently monitor those assets quarterly for impairment, including the review of real estate properties subject to direct financing leases, if applicable. Additionally, we record depreciation and amortization related to our assets. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to real estate assets include, but are not limited to, the following:
The estimated useful lives of our depreciable assets affects the amount of depreciation and amortization recognized on our assets;
The review of impairment indicators and subsequent determination of the undiscounted future cash flows could require us to reduce the carrying value of assets held and used to a fair value estimated by management and recognize an impairment loss. The process for evaluating real estate impairment requires management to make significant assumptions related to certain inputs, including holding periods;
The fair value of held for sale assets is estimated by management. This estimated value could result in a reduction of the carrying value of the asset; and
Changes in assumptions based on actual results may have a material impact on our financial results.
Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
In connection with our acquisition of properties, we allocate the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their respective relative fair values. Tangible assets consist of land, buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements. Intangible assets consist of above- and below-market lease values and the value of in-place leases. Our purchase price allocations are developed utilizing third-party appraisal reports, industry standards and management experience. The risks and uncertainties involved in applying the principles related to purchase price allocations include, but are not limited to, the following:
The value allocated to land, as opposed to buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements, affects the amount of depreciation expense we record. If more value is attributed to land, depreciation expense is lower than if more value is attributed to buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements;
Intangible lease assets and liabilities can be significantly affected by estimates including market rent, lease terms including renewal options at rental rates below estimated market rental rates, carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, and current market conditions and costs, including tenant improvement allowances and rent concessions; and
We determine whether any financing assumed is above- or below-market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar types of debt financing with similar maturities.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We have elected to use a discounted cash flow model to estimate the allowance for credit losses. This model requires us to develop cash flows which project estimated credit losses over the life of the loan and discount these cash flows at the asset’s effective interest rate. We then record an allowance for credit losses equal to the difference between the amortized cost basis of the asset and the present value of the expected cash flows.
71

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently issued accounting pronouncements are described in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to variable rate borrowings. To meet our short and long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to manage our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, collars and treasury lock agreements in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We do not intend to hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. We do not have any foreign operations and thus we are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.
Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had an aggregate of $540.2 million of variable rate debt, of $459.8 million, excluding any debt subject to interest rate swap agreements, and therefore, we are exposed to interest rate changes in the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).LIBOR. As of December 31, 2017,2020, an increase or decrease of 50 basis points in interest rates would result in an increase or decrease in interest expense of $2.3$2.7 million per year.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had 12five interest rate swap agreements outstanding, which mature on various dates from June 2018March 2021 through July 2021,March 2023, with an aggregate notional amount of $1.0$1.09 billion and an aggregate fair value of the net derivative assetliability of $7.1$12.3 million. The fair value of these interest rate swap agreements is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads. As of December 31, 2017,2020, an increase of 50 basis points in interest rates would result in a change of $14.3$2.6 million to the fair value of the net derivative asset,liability, resulting in a net derivative assetliability of $21.4$9.7 million. A decrease of 50 basis points in interest rates would result in a $14.5$2.7 million change to the fair value of the net derivative asset,liability, resulting in a net derivative liability of $7.4$15.0 million.
As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2017,2020, it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information presented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations.
These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rate changes on our borrowing costs and assume no other changes in our capital structure.
In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) that regulates LIBOR announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee which identified the SOFR as its preferred alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR in derivatives and other financial contracts. We are not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. Any changes adopted by FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. If that were to occur, our interest payments could change. In addition, uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in its current form.
We have interest rate swap agreements maturing on various dates from March 2021 through March 2023, as further discussed above, that are indexed to LIBOR. As such, we are monitoring and evaluating the related risks, which include interest on loans or amounts received and paid on derivative instruments. These risks arise in connection with transitioning contracts to a new alternative rate, including any resulting value transfer that may occur. The value of loans, or derivative instruments tied to LIBOR could also be impacted if LIBOR is limited or discontinued. For some instruments, the method of transitioning to an alternative rate may be challenging, as they may require negotiation with the respective counterparty.
If a contract is not transitioned to an alternative rate and LIBOR is discontinued, the impact on our contracts is likely to vary by contract. If LIBOR is discontinued or if the methods of calculating LIBOR change from their current form, interest rates on our current or future indebtedness may be adversely affected.
72

Table of Contents

While we expect LIBOR to be available in substantially its current form until the end of 2021, it is possible that LIBOR will become unavailable prior to that point. This could result, for example, if sufficient banks decline to make submissions to the LIBOR administrator. In that case, the risks associated with the transition to an alternative reference rate will be accelerated and magnified.
Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of tenants are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations,

69



including those to us, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. We are subject to tenant, geographic and industry concentrations. Any downturn of the economic conditions in one or more of these tenants, states or industries could result in a material reduction of our cash flows or material losses to us.
The factors considered in determining the credit risk of our tenants include, but are not limited to: payment history; credit status and change in status, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (credit ratings for public companies are used as a primary metric); change in tenant space needs (i.e., expansion/downsize); tenant financial performance; economic conditions in a specific geographic region; and industry specific credit considerations. We believe that the credit risk of our portfolio is reduced by the high quality of our existing tenant base, reviews of prospective tenants’ risk profiles prior to lease execution and consistent monitoring of our portfolio to identify potential problem tenants and mitigation options.
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements and supplementary data filed as part of this report are set forth beginning on page F-1 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There were no changes in or disagreements with our independent registered public accountants during the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to us, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that no controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, an evaluation as of December 31, 20172020 was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2017,2020, were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2020.
73

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 20172020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
None.

74
70




PART III
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item will be presented in our definitive proxy statement for our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2017,2020, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item will be presented in our definitive proxy statement for our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2017,2020, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item will be presented in our definitive proxy statement for our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2017,2020, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item will be presented in our definitive proxy statement for our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2017,2020, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item will be presented in our definitive proxy statement for our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2017,2020, and is incorporated herein by reference.

71
75



PART IV
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Financial Statements
The list of the consolidated financial statements contained herein is set forth on page F-1 hereof.
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule III – Real Estate Assets and Accumulated Depreciation is set forth beginning on page S-1 hereof.
Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate is set forth beginning on page S-3 hereof.
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172020 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).
Exhibit No.Description
2.1Description 000-54939), filed August 31, 2020).
2.2
3.12.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.43.2
4.1
3.54.2
3.610.1
3.7
4.110.2
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.810.4
10.9
10.10
10.1110.5
10.6
21.1*10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17*
10.18*
21.1*
23.1*
31.1*
31.2*
32.1**
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104*Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as InLine XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

____________________________________
*Filed herewith.
**In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.

76
72



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized this 30th31st day of March, 2018.2021.
 
CIM Real Estate Finance Trust, Inc.
(Registrant)
By:Cole Credit Property Trust IV, Inc.
By:/s/ NATHAN D. DEBACKER
Nathan D. DeBacker
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.


SignatureTitleDate
 /s/ RICHARD S. RESSLERChief Executive Officer and President and DirectorMarch 30, 2018
Richard S. Ressler(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ NATHAN D. DEBACKERChief Financial Officer andMarch 30, 2018
Nathan D. DeBackerTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ JEFFREY R. SMITHVice President of AccountingMarch 30, 2018
Jeffrey R. Smith(Principal Accounting Officer)
 /s/ T. PATRICK DUNCANIndependent Director and Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentMarch 30, 201831, 2021
Richard S. Ressler(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ NATHAN D. DEBACKERChief Financial Officer and TreasurerMarch 31, 2021
Nathan D. DeBacker (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ JEFFREY R. SMITHVice President of AccountingMarch 31, 2021
Jeffrey R. Smith(Principal Accounting Officer)
 /s/ T. PATRICK DUNCANIndependent DirectorMarch 31, 2021
T. Patrick Duncan
 /s/ LAWRENCE S. JONESIndependent DirectorMarch 30, 201831, 2021
Lawrence S. Jones
 /s/ ALICIA K. HARRISONIndependent DirectorMarch 30, 201831, 2021
Alicia K. Harrison
 /s/ W. BRIAN KRETZMERIndependent DirectorMarch 30, 201831, 2021
W. Brian Kretzmer
 /s/ HOWARD A. SILVERIndependent DirectorMarch 31, 2021
W. Howard A. Silver
/s/ STEPHEN O. EVANSIndependent DirectorMarch 31, 2021
Stephen O. Evans
/s/ MARCUS E. BROMLEYIndependent DirectorMarch 31, 2021
Marcus E. Bromley
/S/ ROBERT A. GARY IVIndependent DirectorMarch 31, 2021
Robert A. Gary IV
/s/ CALVIN E. HOLLISIndependent DirectorMarch 31, 2021
Calvin E. Hollis
 /s/ AVRAHAM SHEMESHDirectorMarch 31, 2021
Avraham Shemesh
 /s/ ELAINE Y. WONGDirectorMarch 31, 2021
Elaine Y. Wong

77

73



INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Financial StatementsPage
S-17


F-1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Cole Credit PropertyCIM Real Estate Finance Trust, IV, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cole Credit PropertyCIM Real Estate Finance Trust, IV, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes and the scheduleschedules listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for credit losses in the year ended December 31, 2020 due to adoption of Accounting Standard Update, or ASU, 2016-13 “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses – Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Topic 326).” The assessment of allowance for credit losses is also communicated as a critical audit matter below.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Real Estate Assets: Determination of Impairment Indicators — Refer to Notes 2 and 4 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company’s evaluation of real estate assets for impairment involves an initial assessment of each real estate asset to determine whether events or changes in circumstances exist that may indicate that the carrying amounts of real estate assets are no longer recoverable. Possible indications of impairment may include credit concerns of a property’s major tenants, changes in anticipated holding periods, or other circumstances. When events or changes in circumstances exist, the Company evaluates its real estate assets for impairment by comparing undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated over the life of each asset to the respective carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows, an analysis is performed to determine the fair value of the asset.
F-2

Table of Contents
The Company makes significant assumptions to evaluate real estate assets for possible indications of impairment, including expected holding periods. Changes in these assumptions could result in additional impairment charges in the future.
Given the Company’s evaluation of possible indications of impairment of real estate assets requires management to make significant assumptions, performing audit procedures to evaluate whether management appropriately identified events or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable required a high degree of auditor judgment.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of real estate assets for possible indications of impairment included the following, among others:
We evaluated management’s impairment indicator analysis by testing real estate assets for possible indications of impairment, including searching for adverse asset-specific and/or market conditions, such as vacancies, tenants that are late on rent or have outstanding rent balances, tenant move-outs, and tenant bankruptcies, among others.
We tested the assumptions underlying management’s cash flow projections prepared as a completeness test to evaluate whether all impairment indicators have been appropriately identified.
We performed corroborating inquiries with management, including property accounting, leasing and portfolio oversight to determine whether factors were identified in the current period that may be an impairment indicator, including changes in expected holding periods, or changes in market rental rates.
Assessment of Allowance for Credit Losses – Refer to Notes 2 and 7 to the financial statements (also see change in accounting principle explanatory paragraph above)
Critical Audit Matter Description
In the first quarter of 2020, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires evaluation by the Company to estimate and record potential credit losses related to the Company’s loans held-for-investment. Significant judgments are required in estimating the allowance for credit losses, including the estimation of future cash flows, the estimation of the fair value and selling costs of the collateral of collateral-dependent loans when the Company determines foreclosure is probable, and assumptions regarding probability of default and loss of broadly syndicated loans.
We identified the assessment of the allowance for credit losses as a critical audit matter based on the significant amount of judgment required by management when evaluating the allowance for credit losses. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including evaluating the allowance for credit losses methodology and analytical models, and evaluating the key inputs and assumptions used in the models.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the allowance for credit losses for the loans held-for-investment portfolio included the following, among others:
We tested the accuracy and evaluated the relevance of the historical loss data as an input to each applicable allowance model.
We evaluated the loss data from external sources used by the Company to determine its relevance to the Company's loans held-for-investment portfolio and consistency with external data from other sources.
We evaluated the estimated cash flows and fair value determinations from the Company’s models and tested each model’s computational accuracy.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
March 30, 2018

31, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010.

F-3



F-2



COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
ASSETS   ASSETS
Real estate assets:   Real estate assets:
Land$1,193,029
 $1,156,417
Land$881,896 $700,210 
Buildings, fixtures and improvements3,371,563
 3,214,212
Buildings, fixtures and improvements2,490,030 1,830,101 
Intangible lease assets589,930
 553,149
Intangible lease assets389,564 313,127 
Total real estate assets, at cost5,154,522
 4,923,778
Total real estate assets, at cost3,761,490 2,843,438 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization(526,976) (389,768)Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization(453,385)(374,103)
Total real estate assets, net4,627,546
 4,534,010
Total real estate assets, net3,308,105 2,469,335 
Real estate-related securitiesReal estate-related securities38,194 
Loans held-for-investment and related receivables, netLoans held-for-investment and related receivables, net962,624 301,630 
Less: Allowance for credit lossesLess: Allowance for credit losses(70,358)
Total loans held-for-investment and related receivables, netTotal loans held-for-investment and related receivables, net892,266 301,630 
Cash and cash equivalents4,745
 9,754
Cash and cash equivalents121,385 466,024 
Restricted cash9,098
 8,040
Restricted cash7,023 7,331 
Rents and tenant receivables, net71,859
 65,446
Rents and tenant receivables, net74,419 58,374 
Due from affiliates56
 58
Derivative assets, prepaid expenses, revenue bonds and other assets12,351
 5,513
Prepaid expenses and other assetsPrepaid expenses and other assets10,406 11,731 
Deferred costs, net3,034
 1,514
Deferred costs, net4,293 2,301 
Assets held for saleAssets held for sale3,518 351,897 
Total assets$4,728,689
 $4,624,335
Total assets$4,459,609 $3,668,623 
   
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Notes payable and credit facility, net$2,471,763
 $2,246,259
Accounts payable and accrued expenses24,635
 25,310
Credit facilities, notes payable and repurchase facilities, netCredit facilities, notes payable and repurchase facilities, net$2,144,993 $1,604,860 
Accrued expenses and accounts payableAccrued expenses and accounts payable30,419 22,038 
Due to affiliates1,984
 5,333
Due to affiliates14,723 14,458 
Intangible lease liabilities, net45,572
 49,075
Intangible lease liabilities, net32,718 20,523 
Distributions payable16,531
 16,498
Distributions payable10,969 16,510 
Deferred rental income and other liabilities11,539
 15,091
Derivative liabilities, deferred rental income and other liabilitiesDerivative liabilities, deferred rental income and other liabilities27,361 19,448 
Total liabilities2,572,024
 2,357,566
Total liabilities2,261,183 1,697,837 
Commitments and contingencies
 
Commitments and contingencies00
Redeemable common stock and noncontrolling interest186,453
 188,938
Redeemable common stockRedeemable common stock180,838 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 490,000,000 shares authorized, 311,582,319 and 311,817,004 shares issued and outstanding, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively3,116
 3,118
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized, NaN issued and outstandingPreferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized, NaN issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 490,000,000 shares authorized, 362,001,968 and 311,207,725 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectivelyCommon stock, $0.01 par value per share; 490,000,000 shares authorized, 362,001,968 and 311,207,725 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively3,620 3,112 
Capital in excess of par value2,607,300
 2,607,304
Capital in excess of par value3,157,859 2,606,925 
Accumulated distributions in excess of earnings(646,834) (531,567)Accumulated distributions in excess of earnings(961,006)(816,181)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)6,630
 (1,024)
Accumulated other comprehensive lossAccumulated other comprehensive loss(2,047)(3,908)
Total stockholders’ equity1,970,212
 2,077,831
Total stockholders’ equity2,198,426 1,789,948 
Total liabilities, redeemable common stock, noncontrolling interest and stockholders’ equity$4,728,689
 $4,624,335
Total liabilities, redeemable common stock and stockholders’ equityTotal liabilities, redeemable common stock and stockholders’ equity$4,459,609 $3,668,623 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4
F-3

Table of Contents


COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 202020192018
Revenues:     
Revenues:
Rental income $371,929
 $356,126
 $321,425
Tenant reimbursement income 52,166
 51,325
 46,306
Rental and other property incomeRental and other property income$261,530 $393,224 $429,636 
Interest incomeInterest income29,393 20,132 1,640 
Total revenues 424,095
 407,451
 367,731
Total revenues290,923 413,356 431,276 
Operating expenses:     
Operating expenses:
General and administrative 13,716
 12,502
 13,652
General and administrative15,385 13,729 14,127 
Property operating 29,777
 23,176
 20,890
Property operating23,399 33,462 30,267 
Real estate tax 37,489
 35,063
 33,571
Real estate tax27,691 32,196 37,898 
Advisory fees and expenses 44,072
 41,926
 36,225
Acquisition-related 1,599
 4,191
 15,526
Management and advisory fees and expensesManagement and advisory fees and expenses44,743 42,339 43,399 
Transaction-relatedTransaction-related905 2,278 2,601 
Depreciation and amortization 141,392
 134,672
 122,227
Depreciation and amortization80,973 107,867 140,979 
Impairment 2,855
 6,737
 1,440
Real estate impairmentReal estate impairment16,737 72,939 32,975 
Provision for credit lossesProvision for credit losses68,356 
Total operating expenses 270,900
 258,267
 243,531
Total operating expenses278,189 304,810 302,246 
Gain on disposition of real estate, netGain on disposition of real estate, net27,518 180,666 6,299 
Merger-related expenses, netMerger-related expenses, net(2,193)
Merger termination fee incomeMerger termination fee income7,380 
Operating income 153,195
 149,184
 124,200
Operating income45,439 289,212 135,329 
Other income (expense):     

Other expense:Other expense:
Interest expense and other, net (90,688) (79,465) (59,199)Interest expense and other, net(64,116)(98,965)(97,871)
Loss recognized on equity interest remeasured to fair value 
 (647) 
Total other income (expense) (90,688) (80,112) (59,199)
Income before real estate dispositions 62,507
 69,072
 65,001
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate, net 17,044
 2,907
 (108)
Loss on extinguishment of debtLoss on extinguishment of debt(4,841)(7,227)(46)
Total other expenseTotal other expense(68,957)(106,192)(97,917)
Net income 79,551
 71,979
 64,893
Net income(23,518)183,020 37,412 
Net income allocated to noncontrolling interest 131
 137
 122
Net income allocated to noncontrolling interest121 134 
Net income attributable to the Company $79,420
 $71,842
 $64,771
Net income attributable to the Company$(23,518)$182,899 $37,278 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:      Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted 311,677,149
 311,863,844
 309,263,576
Basic and diluted311,808,605 311,302,909 311,478,665 
Net income per common share:     
Net income per common share:
Basic and diluted $0.25
 $0.23
 $0.21
Basic and diluted$(0.08)$0.59 $0.12 
Distributions declared per common share $0.625
 $0.625
 $0.625
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

F-4

Table of Contents


COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
 (in thousands)
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Net income $79,551
 $71,979
 $64,893
Other comprehensive income (loss): 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps 4,551
 (4,422) (7,787)
Amount of loss reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) into income as interest expense 3,103
 8,757
 6,485
Total other comprehensive income (loss) 7,654
 4,335
 (1,302)
  
 
 
Comprehensive income 87,205
 76,314
 63,591
Comprehensive income allocated to noncontrolling interest 131
 137
 122
Comprehensive income attributable to the Company $87,074
 $76,177
 $63,469
 Year Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Net income$(23,518)$183,020 $37,412 
Other comprehensive (loss) income
Unrealized gain on real estate-related securities1,657 
Reclassification adjustment for realized gain included in income as other income(510)
Unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate swaps(11,607)(11,456)8,210 
Amount of loss (gain) reclassified from other comprehensive (loss) income into income as interest expense and other, net12,321 (3,475)(4,305)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income1,861 (14,931)3,905 
Comprehensive (loss) income(21,657)168,089 41,317 
Comprehensive income allocated to noncontrolling interest121 134 
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the Company$(21,657)$167,968 $41,183 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6
F-5

Table of Contents


COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 (in thousands, except share amounts)
Common StockCapital in 
Excess
of Par Value
Accumulated
Distributions in Excess of Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Common Stock 
Capital in 
Excess
of Par Value
 
Accumulated
Distributions in Excess of Earnings
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Number of
Shares
Par Value
Number of
Shares
 Par Value 
Balance, January 1, 2015304,950,000
 $3,050
 $2,607,448
 $(280,035) $(4,057) $2,326,406
Balance, January 1, 2018Balance, January 1, 2018311,582,319 $3,116 $2,607,300 $(646,834)$6,630 $1,970,212 
Cumulative effect of accounting changesCumulative effect of accounting changes— — — (488)488 
Issuance of common stock11,745,917
 117
 112,041
 
 
 112,158
Issuance of common stock9,615,850 96 91,668 — — 91,764 
Distributions declared
 
 
 (193,311) 
 (193,311)
Commissions on stock sales and related dealer manager fees
 
 
 
 
 
Other offering costs
 
 (6) 
 
 (6)
Redemptions and cancellations of common stock(4,602,706) (46) (44,142) 
 
 (44,188)
Changes in redeemable common stock
 
 (67,974) 
 
 (67,974)
Comprehensive income
 
 
 64,771
 (1,302) 63,469
Balance, December 31, 2015312,093,211
 $3,121
 $2,607,367
 $(408,575) $(5,359) $2,196,554
Issuance of common stock11,234,006
 112
 109,054
 
 
 109,166
Distributions declared
 
 
 (194,834) 
 (194,834)
Offering costs related to DRIP Offerings
 
 (68) 
 
 (68)
Equity-based compensationEquity-based compensation14,008 — 33 — — 33 
Distributions declared on common stock — $0.625 per common shareDistributions declared on common stock — $0.625 per common share— — — (194,573)— (194,573)
Redemptions of common stock(11,510,213) (115) (110,540) 
 
 (110,655)Redemptions of common stock(9,830,781)(98)(93,732)— — (93,830)
Changes in redeemable common stock
 
 1,491
 
 
 1,491
Changes in redeemable common stock— — 2,061 — — 2,061 
Comprehensive income
 
 
 71,842
 4,335
 76,177
Comprehensive income— — — 37,278 3,905 41,183 
Balance, December 31, 2016311,817,004
 $3,118
 $2,607,304
 $(531,567) $(1,024) $2,077,831
Balance, December 31, 2018Balance, December 31, 2018311,381,396 $3,114 $2,607,330 $(804,617)$11,023 $1,816,850 
Issuance of common stock10,095,437
 101
 101,243
 
 
 101,344
Issuance of common stock9,335,895 93 82,295 — — 82,388 
Distributions declared
 
 
 (194,687) 
 (194,687)
Equity-based compensationEquity-based compensation18,499 — 138 — — 138 
Distributions declared on common stock — $0.625 per common shareDistributions declared on common stock — $0.625 per common share— — — (194,463)— (194,463)
Redemptions of common stock(10,330,122) (103) (103,572) 
 
 (103,675)Redemptions of common stock(9,528,065)(95)(83,993)— — (84,088)
Changes in redeemable common stock
 
 2,325
 
 
 2,325
Changes in redeemable common stock— — 1,155 — — 1,155 
Comprehensive income
 
 
 79,420
 7,654
 87,074
Balance, December 31, 2017311,582,319
 $3,116
 $2,607,300
 $(646,834) $6,630
 $1,970,212
Comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive income (loss)— — — 182,899 (14,931)167,968 
Balance, December 31, 2019Balance, December 31, 2019311,207,725 $3,112 $2,606,925 $(816,181)$(3,908)$1,789,948 
Cumulative effect of accounting changesCumulative effect of accounting changes— — — (2,002)— (2,002)
Issuance of common stockIssuance of common stock4,211,747 42 34,149 — — 34,191 
Issuance of common stock in connection with the MergersIssuance of common stock in connection with the Mergers52,574,431 526 383,793 — — 384,319 
Equity-based compensationEquity-based compensation22,059 — 160 — — 160 
Distributions declared on common stock — $0.38 per common shareDistributions declared on common stock — $0.38 per common share— — — (119,305)— (119,305)
Redemptions of common stockRedemptions of common stock(6,013,994)(60)(48,006)— — (48,066)
Changes in redeemable common stockChanges in redeemable common stock— — 180,838 — — 180,838 
Comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive income (loss)— — — (23,518)1,861 (21,657)
Balance, December 31, 2020Balance, December 31, 2020362,001,968 $3,620 $3,157,859 $(961,006)$(2,047)$2,198,426 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

F-6

Table of Contents


COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 (in(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$(23,518)$183,020 $37,412 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization, net79,546 106,262 139,330 
Amortization of deferred financing costs4,245 5,167 5,351 
Amortization of fair value adjustments of mortgage notes payable assumed(92)(90)(88)
Amortization and accretion on deferred loan fees(1,909)(2,441)(268)
Amortization of premiums and discounts on credit investments(668)
Capitalized interest income(539)(8,546)
Equity-based compensation160 138 33 
Straight-line rental income(6,738)(6,564)(8,077)
Write-offs for uncollectible lease-related receivables5,664 952 522 
Gain on disposition of real estate assets, net(27,518)(180,666)(6,299)
Loss on sale of credit investments, net227 
Amortization of gain on swap termination(13)(18)
Impairment of real estate assets16,737 72,939 32,975 
Provision for credit losses68,356 
Write-off of deferred financing costs633 2,271 46 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Rents and tenant receivables, net(12,536)16,034 (2,432)
Prepaid expenses and other assets1,276 (6,456)(833)
Accrued expenses and accounts payable4,212 (1,742)14 
Deferred rental income and other liabilities(508)(987)4,921 
Due from affiliates56 
Due to affiliates(656)9,302 3,172 
Net cash provided by operating activities106,361 188,575 205,835 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash acquired in connection with the Mergers13,810 
Investment in real estate-related securities(76,644)
Investment in broadly syndicated loans(582,654)(2,750)
Investment in real estate assets and capital expenditures(48,995)(23,887)(19,202)
Origination and acquisition of loans held-for-investment, net(238,563)(217,014)(89,295)
Origination and exit fees received on loans held-for-investment3,200 1,697 185 
Principal payments received on loans held-for-investment119,443 17,186 
Principal payments received on real estate-related securities2,571 
Net proceeds from sale of real estate-related securities37,593 
Net proceeds from disposition of real estate assets263,797 1,399,953 64,180 
Net proceeds from sale of broadly syndicated loans39,902 
Payment of property escrow deposits(875)(350)(1,100)
Refund of property escrow deposits875 350 1,100 
Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims400 110 240 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(466,140)1,175,295 (43,892)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Redemptions of common stock(48,066)(84,088)(93,830)
Distributions to stockholders(90,655)(112,083)(102,822)
Proceeds from credit facility and repurchase facilities576,880 424,500 268,000 
Repayments of credit facility and notes payable(417,902)(1,137,022)(227,181)
Payment of loan deposits(65)
Deferred financing costs paid(5,360)(1,211)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest(285)(279)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities14,832 (910,189)(156,112)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash(344,947)453,681 5,831 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period473,355 19,674 13,843 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$128,408 $473,355 $19,674 
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash to the consolidated balance sheets:
Cash and cash equivalents$121,385 $466,024 $10,533 
Restricted cash7,023 7,331 9,141 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash$128,408 $473,355 $19,674 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$79,551
 $71,979
 $64,893
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization, net139,253
 133,549
 121,128
Amortization of deferred financing costs5,313
 5,711
 4,646
Amortization of fair value adjustment of mortgage notes payable assumed(86) (84) (336)
Straight-line rental income(10,082) (11,555) (11,776)
Bad debt expense1,908
 9
 320
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint venture
 (615) (798)
Return on investment from unconsolidated joint venture
 615
 1,038
(Gain) loss on disposition of real estate assets, net(17,044) (2,907) 108
Impairment of real estate assets2,855
 6,737
 1,440
Fair value adjustment to contingent consideration(337) (2,667) (1,747)
Ineffectiveness of interest rate swaps(488) 
 
Write-off of deferred financing costs896
 
 
Loss recognized on equity interest remeasured to fair value
 647
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:     
Rents and tenant receivables862
 (4,023) (3,570)
Prepaid expenses and other assets(67) (884) (503)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(192) 958
 6,043
Deferred rental income and other liabilities(70) (4,883) 1,436
Due from affiliates2
 (11) 423
Due to affiliates(3,349) (280) 140
Net cash provided by operating activities198,925
 192,296
 182,885
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Investment in real estate assets and capital expenditures(320,700) (219,502) (677,754)
Investment in revenue bonds(2,081) 
 
Real estate developments
 
 (684)
Return of investment in unconsolidated joint venture
 1,033
 571
Acquisition of unconsolidated joint venture partner's interest
 (1,626) 
Proceeds from disposition of real estate assets99,013
 30,811
 1,058
Payment of property escrow deposits(11,472) (5,854) (3,240)
Refund of property escrow deposits11,722
 6,604
 7,025
Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims132
 788
 15
Net cash used in investing activities(223,386) (187,746) (673,009)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Redemptions and cancellations of common stock(103,675) (110,655) (44,188)
Offering costs related to DRIP Offerings
 (68) (6)
Distributions to stockholders(93,310) (85,740) (80,773)
Proceeds from notes payable and credit facility1,572,706
 493,420
 1,218,367
Repayments of notes payable and credit facility(1,341,617) (313,426) (621,388)
Payment of loan deposits(1,139) (3,378) (3,242)
Refund of loan deposits1,064
 3,378
 3,242
Deferred financing costs paid(13,228) (3,344) (7,638)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest
 
 762
Distributions to noncontrolling interest(291) (269) (269)
Earnout liability paid
 (1,264) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities20,510
 (21,346) 464,867
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash(3,951) (16,796) (25,257)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period17,794
 34,590
 59,847
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$13,843
 $17,794
 $34,590
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7
F-8

Table of Contents


COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
Cole Credit PropertyCIM Real Estate Finance Trust, IV, Inc. (the(the “Company”) is a non-exchange traded real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed as a Maryland corporation incorporated on July 27, 2010, that elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”)REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2012. The Company operates a diversified portfolio of core commercial real estate assets primarily consisting of net leased properties located throughout the United States. As of December 31, 2020, the Company owned 516 properties, comprising 21.3 million rentable square feet of commercial space located in 45 states. As of December 31, 2020, the rentable square feet at these properties was 94.1% leased, including month-to-month agreements, if any. The Company intends to continue to pursue a more diversified investment strategy across the capital structure by balancing the Company’s existing core of commercial real estate assets leased to creditworthy tenants under long-term net leases with a portfolio of commercial mortgage loans and other credit investments in which the Company’s sponsor and its affiliates have expertise. As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s loan portfolio consisted of 206 loans with a net book value of $892.3 million, and investments in real estate-related securities of $38.2 million.
A majority of the Company’s business is conducted through CIM Real Estate Finance Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, of which the Company is the sole general partner of and owns, directly or indirectly, 100% of the partnership interests in Cole Operating Partnership IV, LP,interests.
The Company is externally managed by CIM Real Estate Finance Management, LLC, a Delaware limited partnership.
On November 13, 2017, VEREIT Operating Partnership, L.P.liability company (“VEREIT OP”CMFT Management”), a former affiliated entity of the Company’s sponsor, CCO Group (as defined below), entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with CCA Acquisition, LLC (“CCA”), a newly-formedwhich is an affiliate of CIM Group, LLC (“CIM”), pursuant to which CCA agreed to acquire all of. CIM is a community-focused real estate and infrastructure owner, operator, lender and developer. Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, CIM has offices across the issuedUnited States and outstanding shares of common stock of Cole Capital Advisors, Inc.,in Tokyo, Japan.
CCO Group, LLC owns and controls CMFT Management, the direct orCompany’s manager, and is the indirect owner of Cole REIT Advisors IV,CCO Capital, LLC (“CR IV Advisors”CCO Capital”), Cole Capital Corporationthe Company’s dealer manager, and CREI Advisors, LLC (“CREI Advisors”), the Company’s external advisor, dealer manager and property manager, respectively (the “Transaction”).
On February 1, 2018, the Transaction was completed. Immediately following the completion of the Transaction, Cole Capital Advisors, Inc. and the Company’s dealer manager were each converted into Delaware limited liability companies, Cole Capital Advisors, Inc.’s name was changed to CCO Group, LLC, and the Company’s dealer manager’s name was changed to CCO Capital, LLC (“CCO Capital”). As a result of the Transaction, CIM owns and/or controlsmanager. CCO Group, LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively, “CCO Group”), and CCO Group, LLC owns and controls CR IV Advisors, CCO Capital and CREI Advisors, serve as the Company’s external advisor, dealer manager for the Offerings (as defined below)sponsor and property manager, respectively.
In addition, as part of the Transaction, VEREIT OP and CCO Group, LLC entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) pursuantsponsor to which VEREIT OP will continue to provide certain services to CCO Group and to the Company, Cole Credit Property Trust V,CIM Income NAV, Inc. (“CCPT V”), Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”), Cole Office & Industrial (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”) and Cole Real EstateCIM Income Strategy (Daily NAV), Inc. (“Cole Income NAV Strategy”NAV”) (CCPT V, CCIT II, CCIT III, Cole Income NAV Strategy and the. The Company collectively, the “Cole REITs®”), including operational real estate support. VEREIT OP will continue to provide such services through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITsrelies upon CIM Capital IC Management, LLC, our investment advisor with respect to its 2018 fiscal year) (the “Initial Services Term”) and willinvestments in securities, to provide consulting and research services through December 31, 2023 as requested by CCO Group, LLC.substantially all of our day-to-day management.
Despite the indirect change of ownership and control of the Company’s advisor, dealer manager, property manager and sponsor, the Company expects that, during the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, the advisory, dealer manager and property management services the Company receives will continue without any material changes in personnel (except as supplemented by the management oversight of CIM personnel) or material change in service procedures. During the Initial Services Term of the Services Agreement, CCO Group, LLC intends to evaluate and effectuate an appropriate transition of VEREIT OP’s services under the Services Agreement to other CIM affiliates or third parties with the goal of ensuring continuity and minimizing disruption.
On January 26, 2012,, pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-169533) (the “Registration Statement”) filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the Company commenced its initial public offering on a “best efforts” basis of up to a maximum of $2.975 billion in shares of common stock (the “Offering”). On November 25, 2013, the Company reallocated $400.0 million in shares from the distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”) portion of the Offering to the primary portion of the Offering, and on February 18, 2014, the Company reallocated an additional $23.0 million in shares from the DRIP portion of the Offering to the primary portion of the Offering. As a result of these reallocations, the Offering offered up to a maximum of approximately 292.3 million shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share in the primary portion of the Offering and up to approximately 5.5 million additional shares pursuant to the DRIP portion of the Offering under which the Company’s stockholders could have elected to have distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock at a price of $9.50 per share.
The Company ceased issuing shares in the Offering on April 4, 2014. At the completion of the Offering, a total of approximately 297.4 million shares of common stock had been issued, including approximately 292.3 million shares of common stock sold to the public pursuant to the primary portion of the Offering and approximately 5.1 million shares of common stock issued pursuant to the DRIPdistribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) portion of the Offering. The remaining approximately 404,000 unsold shares from the Offering were deregistered.

F-8

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The Company registered $247.0 million of shares of common stock under the DRIP (the “Initial DRIP Offering”) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-192958) (the “Initial DRIP Offering”), which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 19, 2013 and automatically became effective with the SEC upon filing. The Company ceased issuing shares under the Initial DRIP Offering effective as of June 30, 2016. At the completion of the Initial DRIP Offering, a total of approximately $241.7 million of shares of common stock had been issued. The remaining $5.3 million of unsold shares from the Initial DRIP Offering were deregistered.
The Company registered an additional $600.0 million of shares of common stock under the DRIP pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-212832) (the “Secondary DRIP Offering,” and together with the Initial DRIP Offering, the “DRIP Offerings,” and the DRIP Offerings collectively with the Offering, the “Offerings”) pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-212832), which was filed with the SEC on August 2, 2016 and automatically became effective with the SEC upon filing. The Company began to issue shares under the Secondary DRIP Offering on August 2, 2016 and will continuecontinued to issue shares under the Secondary DRIP Offering.
On September 27, 2015,Offering until, on August 30, 2020, the Company announced that itsCompany’s board of directors (the “Board”) had establishedsuspended the Secondary DRIP Offering in connection with the entry of the Company into the Merger Agreements (as defined below). On March 25, 2021, the Board reinstated the Secondary DRIP Offering, effective April 1, 2021.
The Board establishes an updated estimated per share net asset value (“NAV”) of the Company’s common stock as of August 31, 2015, of $9.70 per shareon at least an annual basis for purposes of assisting broker-dealers that participated in the Offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations under National Association of Securities Dealers ConductFinancial Industry Regulatory Authority Rule 2340. On November 10, 2016, the Board established an updated estimated per share net asset value (“NAV”)2231. Distributions are reinvested in shares of the Company’s common stock under the DRIP at the estimated per share NAV as determined by the Board. Additionally, the
F-9

Table of September 30, 2016, of $9.92Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

estimated per share. On March 24, 2017,share NAV as determined by the Board established an updatedserves as the per share NAV for purposes of the share redemption program. As of December 31, 2020, the estimated per share NAV of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2016, of $10.08 per share. On March 29, 2018,was $7.31, which was established by the Board established an updated estimatedon August 11, 2020 using a valuation date of June 30, 2020. Commencing on August 14, 2020, $7.31 served as the per share NAV ofunder the Company’s common stock, as of December 31, 2017, of $9.37 per share. In determining the estimatedDRIP. The Board previously established a per share NAVsNAV as of August 31, 2015, September 30, 2016, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2017, the Board considered informationDecember 31, 2018, December 31, 2019 and analysis, including valuation materials that were provided by a third-party valuation expert, information provided by CR IV Advisors, and the estimated per share NAV recommendation made by the valuation committee of the Board, which committee is comprised entirely of independent directors.March 31, 2020. The Company’s estimated per share NAVs are not audited or reviewed by its independent registered public accounting firm.
PriorCompleted Mergers
On December 21, 2020, the Company completed the mergers previously disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 31, 2020, with Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT III), Inc. (“CCIT III”) and Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc. (“CCPT V”), pursuant to (i) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 30, 2020 (as amended on November 3, 2020, the “CCIT III Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Thor III Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“CCIT III Merger Sub”), and CCIT III, with CCIT III Merger Sub surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “CCIT III Merger”), and (ii) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 30, 2020 (as amended on each of October 1, 2015, distributions were reinvested in22, 2020, October 24, 2020 and October 29, 2020, the “CCPT V Merger Agreement,” and together with the CCIT III Merger Agreement, the “Merger Agreements”), by and among the Company, Thor V Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“CCPT V Merger Sub”), and CCPT V, with CCPT V Merger Sub surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “CCPT V Merger,” and collectively with the CCIT III Merger, the “Mergers”). In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), the separate existence of CCIT III and CCPT V ceased. Through the Mergers, the Company acquired 146 properties with a total of 3.8 million square feet, all of which had an aggregate gross real estate value of approximately $763.0 million. The combined company after the Mergers retained the name “CIM Real Estate Finance Trust, Inc.” Each Merger qualified as a “reorganization” under, and within the meaning of, Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). For more information on the Mergers, see Note 4 — Real Estate Assets.
At the effective time of the Mergers and subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreements, each issued and outstanding share of common stock of CCIT III and CCPT V was converted into the right to receive 1.098 and 2.892 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, respectively, subject to the treatment of fractional shares in accordance with the Merger Agreements (the “Merger Consideration”). At the effective time of the Mergers and subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreements, each issued and outstanding share of common stock granted under CCIT III’s and CCPT V’s respective 2018 Equity Incentive Plans, whether vested or unvested, was cancelled in exchange for an amount equal to the applicable Merger Consideration.
Concurrently with the entry into the Merger Agreements, (i) CCIT III and its advisor entered into a Termination Agreement (the “CCIT III Termination Agreement”) pursuant to which the Advisory Agreement, dated September 22, 2016, by and between CCIT III and its advisor terminated at the effective time of the CCIT III Merger, and (ii) CCPT V and its advisor entered into a Termination Agreement (the “CCPT V Termination Agreement” and, together with the CCIT III Termination Agreement, the “Termination Agreements”) pursuant to which the Advisory Agreement, dated March 17, 2014, by and between CCPT V and its advisor terminated at the effective time of the CCPT V Merger. Pursuant to the Termination Agreements, each of CCIT III’s advisor and CCPT V’s advisor agreed to waive any subordinated performance fee or disposition fee it otherwise would have been entitled to pursuant to the applicable advisory agreement related to the CCIT III Merger or CCPT V Merger, as applicable.
In order to manage the financial health of the Company, the Board approved and adopted a Second Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan (the “Amended DRIP”) and an amended and restated share redemption program (the “Amended Share Redemption Program”) that, among other changes, provides that the Amended DRIP and the Amended Share Redemption Program may be suspended at a priceany time by majority vote of $9.50 per share. From Octoberthe Board without prior notice if the Board believes such action is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. In connection with the entry of the Company into the Merger Agreements, on August 30, 2020, the Board approved the suspension of the Amended DRIP, and therefore, distributions paid after that date were paid in cash to all stockholders until the Amended DRIP was reinstated, effective April 1, 2015 to November 13, 2016, distributions were reinvested in shares2021, by the Board on March 25, 2021. Additionally, on August 30, 2020, the Board approved the suspension of the Company’s common stock underAmended Share Redemption Program, and therefore, no shares were redeemed from the DRIP at a price of $9.70 per share,Company’s stockholders after that date until the estimated value per share as of August 31, 2015, as determinedAmended Share Redemption Program was reinstated, effective April 1, 2021, by the Board. From November 14, 2016 toBoard on March 27, 2017, distributions were reinvested in shares25, 2021.
F-10

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Terminated Merger Agreement
On August 30, 2020, the Company, Cole Office & Industrial REIT (CCIT II), Inc. (“CCIT II”) and Thor II Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company’s common stock underCompany (“CCIT II Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “CCIT II Merger Agreement”). Subject to the DRIP at a price of $9.92 per share, the estimated per share NAV as of September 30, 2016, as determined by the Board. From March 28, 2017 to March 28, 2018, distributions were reinvested in sharesterms and conditions of the Company’s common stock underCCIT II Merger Agreement, CCIT II would have merged with and into CCIT II Merger Sub (the “CCIT II Merger”), with CCIT II Merger Sub surviving the DRIP atCCIT II Merger, such that following the CCIT II Merger, the surviving entity would continue as a pricewholly owned subsidiary of $10.08 per share, the estimated per share NAVCompany.
On October 29, 2020, CCIT II terminated the CCIT II Merger Agreement pursuant to Sections 9.1(c)(ii) and 9.2 of the CCIT II Merger Agreement and entered into an agreement (the “Termination Notice”) with the Company reflecting such termination and pursuant to which, among other things, CCIT II paid the termination fee equal to $7.38 million to the Company in accordance with the CCIT II Merger Agreement, and agreed to pay to the Company the amount of its expenses up to $3.69 million, required to be paid pursuant to the terms of the CCIT II Merger Agreement (such amounts together, the “CCIT II Termination Payment”). During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company incurred $2.0 million in CCIT II merger-related expenses, $1.8 million of which was reimbursed by CCIT II as of December 31, 2016, as determined by the Board. Commencing on March 29, 2018, distributions are reinvested in shares of the Company’s common stock under the DRIP at a price of $9.37 per share, the estimated per share NAV as of2020. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, as determined by the Board.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had issued approximately 339.2 million sharesreceived the remaining $173,000 in reimbursements from CCIT II. These reimbursements are included as a reduction to merger-related expenses on the consolidated statements of its common stock in the Offerings, including 40.9 million shares issued in the DRIP Offerings, for gross offering proceeds of $3.4 billion before organization and offering costs, selling commissions and dealer manager fees of $306.0 million. As of December 31, 2017, the Company owned 909 properties, which includes nine properties owned through a consolidated joint venture arrangement (the “Consolidated Joint Venture”), comprising 26.9 million rentable square feet of commercial space located in 45 states. As of December 31, 2017, the rentable square feet at these properties was 97.5% leased, including month-to-month agreements, if any.operations.
NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

F-9

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and the Consolidated Joint Venture in which the Company has a controlling financial interest.subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company evaluates its relationships and investments to determine if it has variable interests. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. If the Company determines that it has a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether such interest is in a variable interest entity (“VIE”). VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) the right to receive the expected returns of the entity. The Company consolidates any VIEs when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE’s operations.
For legal entities being evaluated for consolidation, the Company must first determine whether the interests that it holds and fees it receives qualify as variable interests in the entity. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. The Company’s evaluation includes consideration of fees paid to the Company where the Company acts as a decision maker or service provider to the entity being evaluated. If the Company determines that it holds a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether that entity is a VIE.
A VIE must be consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is generally defined as the party who has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. The Company qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Consideration of various factors include, but are not limited to, the Company’s ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses from or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company consolidates any VIEs when the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the difference between consolidating the VIE and accounting for it using the equity method could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate any VIEs based on standards set forth in GAAP as described above.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2018, the Company determined that it had a controlling interest in the Consolidated9 properties owned through a consolidated joint venture arrangement (the “Consolidated Joint VentureVenture”) and therefore met the GAAP requirements for consolidation. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company disposed of the 9 properties previously owned through the Consolidated Joint Venture and therefore determined it no longer had a controlling financial interest in the
F-11

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Consolidated Joint Venture as of December 31, 2019. See Note 4 — Real Estate Assets for a further discussion of this disposition.
Reclassifications
In connection withCertain amounts in the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18, as defined in “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” certain reclassificationsCompany’s prior period consolidated financial statements have been made to prior period balancesreclassified to conform to the current presentationperiod presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported totals or subtotals.
The Company is separately presenting the write-offs for uncollectible lease-related receivables of $952,000 and $522,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which were previously included in straight-line rental income, net in the consolidated statementstatements of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-15, the
The Company reclassified a portioncombined investment in real estate assets of contingent consideration payments made after a business combination which were previously reported in cash flows from financing activities to cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statement$6.2 million and capital expenditures of cash flows. In addition, the Company reclassified $602,000 of contingent consideration payments made after a business combination from cash flows from financing activities to cash flows from operating activities$17.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company also reclassified $788,0002019, and $15,000investment in real estate assets of proceeds from the settlement$11.9 million and capital expenditures of insurance claims from cash flows from operating activities to cash flows from investing activities$7.3 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162018 into a single financial statement line item, investment in real estate assets and 2015, respectively. Under ASU 2016-18, transfers to or from restricted cash which have previously been shown in the Company’s investing activities section of the consolidated statements of cash flows are now required to be shown as part of the total change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cashcapital expenditures, in the consolidated statements of cash flows. This change resulted in an increase in cash flows from investing activities of $234,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016 and a decrease of $3.7 million in cash flows from investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-10

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Real Estate Assets
Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Company considers the period of future benefit of each respective asset to determine the appropriate useful life. The estimated useful lives of the Company’s real estate assets by class are generally as follows:
Buildings40 years
Site improvements15 years
Tenant improvementsLesser of useful life or lease term
Intangible lease assetsLease term
Recoverability of Real Estate Assets
The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators that the Company considers include, but are not limited to,to: bankruptcy or other credit concerns of a property’s major tenant, such as a history of late payments, rentallease concessions and other factors,factors; a significant decrease in a property’s revenues due to lease terminations, vacancies,terminations; vacancies; co-tenancy clauses,clauses; reduced lease rates or other circumstances.rates; changes in anticipated holding periods. When indicators of potential impairment are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of the assets by determining whether the carrying amount of the assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying amount, the Company will adjust the real estate assets to their respective fair values and recognize an impairment loss. Generally, fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, as part of the Company’s quarterly impairment review procedures, the Company recorded impairment charges of $2.9$16.7 million related to four11 properties due to revised cash flow estimates as a result of delinquent rental paymentsmarket conditions and two tenants who had previously filed1 property due to a tenant bankruptcy. The Company’s impairment assessment as of December 31, 2020 was based on the most current information available to the Company, including expected holding periods. If the Company’s expected holding periods for bankruptcy.assets change, subsequent tests for impairment could result in additional impairment charges in the future. The Company cannot provide any assurance that additional material impairment charges with respect to the Company’s real estate assets will not occur during 2021 or in future periods. During the year ended December 31, 2016, two tenants filed for bankruptcy, and collectively, these tenants occupied 100% of three of2019, the Company’s properties. The Company recorded impairment charges of $6.7$72.9 million related to the three27 properties duringwith revised expected holding periods and 7 properties with vacancies. During the year ended December 31, 2016. The2018, the Company recorded impairment charges of $1.4$33.0 million related to one property during the year ended December 31, 2015.20 properties with revised expected holding periods and 2 properties with vacancies. The assumptions and uncertainties utilized in the evaluation of the impairment of real estate assets are discussed in detail in Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements. See also Note 4 — Real Estate Assets for further discussion regarding real estate investment activity.
F-12

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Assets Held for Sale
When a real estate asset is identified by the Company as held for sale, the Company will cease recording depreciation and amortization of the assets related to the property and estimate theits fair value, net of selling costs. If, in management’s opinion, the fair value, net of selling costs, of the asset is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an adjustment to the carrying amount would beis then recorded to reflect the estimated fair value of the property, net of selling costs. There were no assetsAs of December 31, 2019, the Company identified 29 properties with a fair value of $351.9 million as held for sale, and expected to sell a substantial portion of its anchored-shopping center portfolio and certain single-tenant properties within the next 24 months, subject to market conditions. As the Company could not provide assurance that these properties would be sold within a 24-month period, the Company placed 15 properties with a fair value of $228.4 million that were previously classified as held for sale back in service as real estate assets in the consolidated balance sheets during the year ended December 31, 2020. The remaining 14 properties were sold during the year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 20172020, the Company identified 1 property with a fair value of $3.5 million as held for sale, which was sold subsequent to December 31, 2020.
Disposition of Real Estate Assets
Gains and losses from dispositions are recognized once the various criteria relating to the terms of sale and any subsequent involvement by the Company with the asset sold are met. A discontinued operation includes only the disposal of a component of an entity and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s financial results. The Company’s property dispositions during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 did not qualify for discontinued operations presentation and thus, the results of the properties that were sold will remain in operating income, and any associated gains or 2016.losses from the disposition are included in gain on disposition of real estate, net. See Note 4 — Real Estate Assets to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the disposition of individual properties during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Allocation of Purchase Price of Real Estate Assets
Upon the acquisition of real properties, the Company allocates the purchase price to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings and improvements, and to identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above- and below-market leases and the value of in-place leases and other intangibles, based in each case on their respectiverelative fair values. The Company utilizes independent appraisals to assist in the determination of the fair values of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land and buildings). The information in the appraisal, along with any additional information available to the Company’s management, is used in estimating the amount of the purchase price that is allocated to land. Other information in the appraisal, such as building value and market rents, may be used by the Company’s management in estimating the allocation of purchase price to the building and to intangible lease assets and liabilities. The appraisal firm has no involvement in management’s allocation decisions other than providing this market information.
The fair values of above- and below-market lease intangibles are recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2) an estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, which is generally obtained from independent appraisals, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease including, for below-market leases, any bargain renewal periods. The above- and below-market lease intangibles are capitalized as intangible lease assets or liabilities, respectively. Above-market leases are amortized as a reduction to rental income over the

F-11

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


remaining terms of the respective leases. Below-market leases are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal periods. In considering whether or not the Company expects a tenant to execute a bargain renewal option, the Company evaluates economic factors and certain qualitative factors at the time of acquisition, such as the financial strength of the tenant, the remaining lease term, the tenant mix of the leased property, the Company’s relationship with the tenant and the availability of competing tenant space. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts of above- or below-market lease intangibles relating to that lease would be recorded as an adjustment to rental income.
The fair values of in-place leases include estimates of direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant and opportunity costs associated with lost rental and other property income, which are avoided by acquiring a property with an in-place lease. Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant include leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses and are estimated in part by utilizing information obtained from independent appraisals and management’s consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. The intangible values of opportunity costs, which are calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a market absorption period for a similar lease, are capitalized as intangible lease assets and are amortized to expense over the remaining term of the respective leases. If a lease were to be
F-13

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts of in-place lease assets relating to that lease would be expensed.
The Company has acquired, and may continue to acquire, certain properties subject to contingent consideration arrangements that may obligate the Company to pay additional consideration to the seller based on the outcome of future events (the “Contingent Payments”).events. Additionally, the Company may acquire certain properties for which it funds certain contingent consideration amounts into an escrow account pending the outcome of certain future events. The outcome may result in the release of all or a portion of the escrowed funds to the Company or the seller or a combination thereof. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01 (as defined below) in April 2017, contingent consideration arrangements, including amounts funded through an escrow account, were recorded upon acquisition of the respective property at their estimated fair value, and any changes to the estimated fair value subsequent to acquisition were reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in acquisition-related fees and expenses. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-01 in April 2017, contingent consideration arrangements for asset acquisitions are recognized when the contingency is resolved. The determination of the amount of contingent consideration arrangements is based on the probability of several possible outcomes as identified by management.
The Company estimates the fair value of assumed mortgage notes payable based upon indications of current market pricing for similar types of debt financing with similar maturities. Assumed mortgage notes payable are initially recorded at their estimated fair value as of the assumption date, and any difference between such estimated fair value and the mortgage note’s outstanding principal balance is amortized or accreted to interest expense over the term of the respective mortgage note payable.
The determination of the fair values of the real estate assets and liabilities acquired requires the use of significant assumptions with regard to the current market rental rates, rental growth rates, capitalization and discount rates, interest rates and other variables. The use of alternative estimates may result in a different allocation of the Company’s purchase price, which could materially impact the Company’s results of operations.
In April 2017, the Company elected to early adopt ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”), which clarifies the definition of a business by adding guidance to assist entities in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Beginning in April 2017, all real estate acquisitions qualified as asset acquisitions, and as such, acquisition-relatedAcquisition-related fees and certain acquisition-related expenses related to these asset acquisitions wereare capitalized and allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, as described above. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01 in April 2017, all of the Company’s real estate acquisitions were accounted for as business combinations, and as such,Other acquisition-related expenses, relatedsuch as manager reimbursements, continue to these business combination acquisitions werebe expensed as incurred. Prior to April 2017, acquisition-relatedincurred and are included in transaction-related expenses in the Company’saccompanying consolidated statements of operations primarily consisted of legal, deed transfer and other costs related to real estate purchase transactions, including costs incurred for deals that were not consummated. The Company expects its future acquisitions to qualify as asset acquisitions, and as such, the Company will allocate the purchase price to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings and improvements, and to identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above- and below-market leases and the value of in-place leases, based in each case on a relative fair value basis.
Investment in Held-to-Maturity Securities
The Company has investments classified as held-to-maturity securities, which consist of revenue bonds acquired in connection with the purchase of an anchored shopping center. The bonds have a 9.0% interest rate and mature on November 1,

F-12

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


2044. As of December 31, 2017, the Company classified these investments as held-to-maturity as the Company has the intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. These investments are initially recognized in derivative assets, prepaid expenses, revenue bonds and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and are subsequently measured using amortized cost.
The Company’s investments in revenue bonds are reviewed for impairment, including the evaluation of changes in events or circumstances that may indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. Realization is dependent on a number of factors, including investment performance, market conditions and payment structure. The Company will record an impairment charge if it is determined that a decline in the value of the investment below its carrying amount is other than temporary, recovery of its cost basis is uncertain, and/or it is uncertain if the investment will be held to maturity. The analysis of determining whether the impairment of a security is deemed to be other-than-temporary requires significant judgments and assumptions. The use of alternative judgments and assumptions could result in a different conclusion.
Development Activities
Project costs and expenses, including interest incurred, associated with the development, construction and lease-up of a real estate project are capitalized as construction in progress. Once the development and construction of the building is substantially completed, the amounts capitalized to construction in progress are transferred to (i) land and (ii) buildings, fixtures and improvements and are depreciated over their respective useful lives. The Company capitalized $102,000 of interest expense associated with development projects during the year ended December 31, 2016. No such expenses were capitalized during the year ended December 31, 2017.operations.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Joint Venture
OnFrom June 27, 2014 the Company completed the formation of the Consolidated Joint Venture. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement, the joint venture partner has a right to exercise an option (the “Option”), which became effective on June 27, 2016, whereby the Company will be required to purchase the ownership interest of the joint venture partner at fair market value. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the Option has not been exercised. The Company determined it had a controlling interest in the Consolidated Joint Venture and, therefore, met the GAAP requirements for consolidation. The Company recorded net income of $131,000$121,000 and paid distributions of $291,000$285,000 related to the noncontrolling interest during the year ended December 31, 2017. The2019.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recordeddisposed of its interest in the noncontrollingunderlying properties previously owned through the Consolidated Joint Venture, as further discussed in Note 4 — Real Estate Assets. Therefore, the Company determined it no longer had a controlling financial interest of $2.4 million and $2.6 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, as temporary equity in the mezzanine section of the consolidated balance sheets, due to the ability to exercise the Option being outside the control of the Company.2019.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in bank accounts, as well as investments in highly-liquid money market funds. The Company deposits cash with several high quality financial institutions. These deposits are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (“FDIC”) up to an insurance limit of $250,000. At times, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents may exceed federally insured levels. Although the Company bears risk on amounts in excess of those insured by the FDIC, it has not experienced and does not anticipate any losses due to the high quality of the institutions where the deposits are held. Included in cash and cash equivalents was $41.0 million and $126.8 million of unsettled broadly syndicated loan purchases as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The Company had $9.1$7.0 million and $8.0$7.3 million in restricted cash as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,December 31, 2019, respectively. Included in restricted cash was $3.7$3.6 million and $4.0$3.1 million held by lenders in lockbox accounts, as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. As part of certain debt agreements, rents from certain encumbered properties are deposited directly into a lockbox account, from which the monthly debt service payment is disbursed to the lender and the excess is disbursed to the Company. Also included in restricted cash was $5.4$3.4 million and $4.0$4.2 million held by lenders in escrow accounts for real estate taxes and other lender reserves for certain properties, in accordance with the associated lender’s loan agreement as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

Real Estate-Related Securities
Real estate-related securities consists primarily of the Company’s investment in commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”). The Company determines the appropriate classification for real estate-related securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. As of December 31, 2020, the Company classified its investments as available-for-sale as the Company is not actively trading the securities; however, the Company may sell them prior to their maturity. These investments are carried at their estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in other comprehensive (loss) income. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company invested $76.6 million in CMBS.
F-13
F-14

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



During the same period, the Company sold $37.1 million in CMBS resulting in net proceeds of $37.6 million and a gain of $510,000. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had investments in 4 CMBS with an estimated aggregate fair value of $38.2 million.
The following table providesCompany monitors its available-for-sale securities for impairment. An allowance for credit losses is recorded when the Company acquires CMBS, and any subsequent impairment is recognized when the Company determines that a reconciliationdecline in the estimated fair value of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash reported withina security below its amortized cost has resulted from a credit loss or other factors. The Company records impairments related to credit losses through an allowance for credit losses. However, the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsallowance is limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. The Company considers many factors in determining whether a credit loss exists, including, but not limited to, the combined amounts shown onextent to which the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis, recent events specific to the security, industry or geographic area, the payment structure of the security, the failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled interest or principal payments, and external credit ratings and recent changes in such ratings. The analysis of determining whether a credit loss exists requires significant judgments and assumptions. The use of alternative judgments and assumptions could result in a different conclusion.
The amortized cost of real estate-related securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity computed under the effective interest method and is recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in interest and other expense, net. Upon the sale of a security, the realized net gain or loss is computed on the specific identification method.
Loans Held-for-Investment
The Company has acquired, and may continue to acquire, loans related to real estate assets. Additionally, the Company may acquire and originate credit investments, including commercial mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity, and other loans and securities related to commercial real estate assets, as well as corporate loan opportunities that are consistent with the Company’s investment strategy and objectives. The Company intends to hold the loans held-for-investment for the foreseeable future or until maturity. Loans held-for-investment are carried on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at amortized cost, net of any allowance for credit losses. Discounts or premiums, origination fees and exit fees are amortized as a component of interest income using the effective interest method over the life of the respective loans, or on a straight-line basis when it approximates the effective interest method. Upon the sale of a loan, the realized net gain or loss is computed on the specific identification method.
Interest earned is either received in cash or capitalized to loans held-for-investment and related receivables, net in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Interest is capitalized when certain conditions are met as specified in each loan agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $29.4 million in interest income, of which $539,000 was capitalized to loans held-for-investment and related receivables, net.
Accrual of interest income is suspended on nonaccrual loans. Loans that are past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest, or where reasonable doubt exists as to timely collection, are generally considered nonperforming and placed on nonaccrual status. Interest collected is recognized on a cash basis by crediting income when received. Loans may be restored to accrual status when all principal and interest are current and full repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest are reasonably assured.As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s 8 mezzanine loans with a net book value of $89.4 million were nonaccrual loans. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $565,000 in interest income related to the nonaccrual loans. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company completed foreclosure proceedings to take control of the assets securing the mezzanine loans.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”), as further described in “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” on January 1, 2020. The allowance for credit losses required under ASU 2016-13 reflects the Company’s current estimate of potential credit losses related to the Company’s loans held-for-investment included in the consolidated balance sheets. The initial allowance for credit losses recorded on January 1, 2020 is reflected as a direct charge to retained earnings on the Company’s consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity; however, subsequent changes to the allowance for credit losses are recognized through net income on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. While ASU 2016-13 does not require any particular method for determining the allowance for credit losses, it does specify the allowance should be based on relevant information about past events, including historical loss experience, current portfolio and market conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts for the duration of each respective loan. In addition, other than a few narrow exceptions, ASU 2016-13 requires that all financial instruments subject to the credit loss model have some amount of loss reserve to reflect the GAAP principal underlying the
F-15

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

credit loss model that all loans, debt securities, and similar assets have some inherent risk of loss, regardless of credit quality, subordinate capital, or other mitigating factors.
The Company has elected to use a discounted cash flow model to estimate the allowance for credit losses. This model requires the Company to develop cash flows (in thousands):which project estimated credit losses over the life of the loan and discount these cash flows at the asset’s effective interest rate. The Company then records an allowance for credit losses equal to the difference between the amortized cost basis of the asset and the present value of the expected cash flows. The Company considers loan investments that are both (i) expected to be substantially repaid through the operation or sale of the underlying collateral, and (ii) for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, to be “collateral-dependent” loans. For such loans that the Company determines that foreclosure of the collateral is probable, the Company measures the expected losses based on the difference between the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell and the amortized cost basis of the loan as of the measurement date. For collateral-dependent loans that the Company determines foreclosure is not probable, the Company applies a practical expedient to estimate expected losses using the difference between the collateral’s fair value (less costs to sell the asset if repayment is expected through the sale of the collateral) and the amortized cost basis of the loan. For the Company’s broadly syndicated loans, the Company uses a probability of default and loss given default method using an underlying third-party CMBS/Commercial Real Estate (“CRE”) loan database with historical loan losses from 1998 to 2019. The Company may use other acceptable alternative approaches in the future depending on, among other factors, the type of loan, underlying collateral, and availability of relevant historical market loan loss data.
The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 using the modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost. Prior to adoption, the Company had 0 allowance for credit losses on its consolidated balance sheets. The Company recorded a cumulative-effective adjustment to the opening retained earnings in its consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity as of January 1, 2020 of $2.0 million.
Quarterly, the Company evaluates the risk of all loans and assigns a risk rating based on a variety of factors, grouped as follows: (i) loan and credit structure, including the as-is loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio and structural features; (ii) quality and stability of real estate value and operating cash flow, including debt yield, dynamics of the geography, property type and local market, physical condition, stability of cash flow, leasing velocity and quality and diversity of tenancy; (iii) performance against underwritten business plan; and (iv) quality, experience and financial condition of sponsor, borrower and guarantor(s). Based on a 5-point scale, the Company’s loans are rated “1” through “5,” from least risk to greatest risk, respectively, which ratings are defined as follows:
1-Outperform — Most satisfactory asset quality and liquidity, good leverage capacity. A “1” rating maintains predictable and strong cash flows from operations. The trends and outlook for the credit's operations, balance sheet, and industry are neutral to favorable. Collateral, if appropriate, exceeds performance metrics;
2-Meets or Exceeds ExpectationsAcceptable asset quality, moderate excess liquidity, modest leverage capacity. A “2” rating could have some financial/non-financial weaknesses which are offset by strengths; however, the credit demonstrates an ample current cash flow from operations. The trends and outlook for the credit's operations, balance sheet, and industry are generally positive or neutral. Collateral performance, if appropriate, meets or exceeds substantially all performance metrics included in original or current underwriting / business plan;
3-SatisfactoryAcceptable asset quality, somewhat strained liquidity, minimal leverage capacity. A “3” rating is at times characterized by acceptable cash flows from operations. The trends and conditions of the credit's operations and balance sheet are neutral. Collateral performance, if appropriate, meets or is on track to meet underwriting; business plan can reasonably be achieved;
4-Underperformance — The debt investment possesses credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses which deserve management’s close and continued attention. The portfolio company’s operations and/or balance sheet have demonstrated an adverse trend or deterioration which, while serious, has not reached the point where the liquidation of debt is jeopardized. These weaknesses are generally considered correctable by the borrower in the normal course of business but may weaken the asset or inadequately protect the Company’s credit position if not checked or corrected. Collateral performance, if appropriate, falls short of original underwriting, material differences exist from business plan, or both; technical milestones have been missed; defaults may exist, or may soon occur absent material improvement; and
5-Default/Possibility of Loss — The debt investment is protected inadequately by the current enterprise value or paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral, if any. The underlying company’s operations has well-defined weaknesses based upon objective evidence, such as recurring or significant decreases in revenues and cash flows. Major variance from business plan; loan covenants or technical milestones have been breached; timely exit from
F-16

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash and cash equivalents$4,745
 $9,754
 $26,316
Restricted cash9,098
 8,040
 8,274
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows$13,843
 $17,794
 $34,590
loan via sale or refinancing is questionable; risk of principal loss. Collateral performance, if appropriate, is significantly worse than underwriting.
The Company generally assigns a risk rating of “3” to all newly originated or acquired loans-held-for-investment during a most recent quarter, except in the case of specific circumstances warranting an exception.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal fees and other costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing. These costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written off when the associated debt is refinancedextinguished or repaid before maturity. The presentation of all deferred financing costs, other than those associated with the revolving loan portion of the credit facility,facilities, are classified such that the debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Debt issuance costs related to securing a revolving line of credit are presented as an asset and amortized ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement. As such, the Company’s current and corresponding prior period total deferred costs, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets relate only to the revolving loan portion of the credit facilityfacilities and the historical presentation, amortization and treatment of unamortized costs are still applicable. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company had $3.0$4.3 million and $1.5$2.3 million, respectively, of deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization, related to the revolving loan portion of the credit facility.facilities. Costs incurred in seeking financialfinancing transactions that do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined the financing will not close.
Due to Affiliates
CR IV Advisors,CMFT Management, and certain of its affiliates, received and will continue to receive, fees, reimbursements and compensation in connection with services provided relating to the Offerings and the acquisition, management, financing and leasing of the properties of the Company.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company accounts for its derivative instruments at fair value. Accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on the intended use of the derivative instrument and the designation of the derivative instrument. The change in fair value of the effective portion of the derivative instrument that is designated as a cash flow hedge is recorded as other comprehensive income (loss).income. The changes in fair value for derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges or that do not meet the hedge accounting criteria are recorded as a gain or loss to operations.
Redeemable Common Stock
Under the Company’s share redemption program,Amended Share Redemption Program, the Company’s obligation to redeem shares of its outstanding common stock is limited, among other things, to the net proceeds received by the Company from the sale of shares under the Amended DRIP, net of shares redeemed to date. The Company records amountsthe maximum amount that areis redeemable under the share redemption programAmended Share Redemption Program as redeemable common stock outside of permanent equity in its consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the amount of redeemable common stock from period to period are recorded as an adjustment to capital in excess of par value. As of December 31, 2020, there was 0 redeemable common stock, as the Board approved the suspension of the share redemption program on August 30, 2020 in connection with our entry into the Merger Agreements.
Leases
The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components. The Company has elected to not separate non-lease components from lease components for all classes of underlying assets (primarily real estate assets) and will account for the combined components as rental and other property income. Non-lease components included in rental and other property income include certain tenant reimbursements for maintenance services (including common-area maintenance services or “CAM”), real estate taxes, insurance and utilities paid for by the lessor but consumed by the lessee. As a lessor, the Company has further determined that this policy will be effective only on a lease that has been classified as an operating lease and the revenue recognition pattern and timing is the same for both types of components. The Company is not a party to any material leases where it is the lessee.
Significant judgments and assumptions are inherent in not only determining if a contract contains a lease, but also the lease classification, terms, payments, and, if needed, discount rates. Judgments include the nature of any options, including if they
F-17

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

will be exercised, evaluation of implicit discount rates and the assessment and consideration of “fixed” payments for straight-line rent revenue calculations.
The Company has an investment in a real estate property that is subject to a ground lease, for which a lease liability and right of use (“ROU”) asset of $2.4 million was recorded as of December 31, 2020. See Note 16 — Leases for a further discussion regarding this ground lease.
Lease costs represent the initial direct costs incurred in the origination, negotiation and processing of a lease agreement. Such costs include outside broker commissions and other independent third-party costs and are amortized over the life of the lease on a straight-line basis. Costs related to salaries and benefits, supervision, administration, unsuccessful origination efforts and other activities not directly related to completed lease agreements are expensed as incurred. Upon successful lease execution, leasing commissions are capitalized.
Revenue Recognition
Certain properties haveRevenue from leasing activities
Rental and other property income is primarily derived from fixed contractual payments from operating leases where minimum rental payments increase duringand, therefore, is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company records rental income forlease, which typically begins the full termdate the tenant takes control of each lease on a straight-line basis when earned and collectability is reasonably assured.the space. When the Company acquires a property, the terms of existing leases are considered to commence as of the acquisition date for the purpose of this calculation. Variable rental and other property income consists primarily of tenant reimbursements for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses which are included in rental and other property income in the period when such costs are incurred, with offsetting expenses in real estate taxes and property operating expenses, respectively, within the consolidated statements of operations. The Company defers the recognition of contingentvariable rental and other property income, such as percentage rents, until the specific target that triggers the contingent rental income is achieved. Expected reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate taxes and operating expenses are included in tenant reimbursement income in the period when such costs are incurred.

F-14

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The Company continually reviews whether collection of lease-related receivables, related to rent, including any straight-line rent, and current and future operating expense reimbursements from tenants and determinesare probable. The determination of whether collectability by takingis probable takes into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. InUpon the eventdetermination that the collectability of a receivable is uncertain,not probable, the Company will record an increasea reduction to rental and other property income for amounts previously recorded and a decrease in the allowance for uncollectible accounts. Asoutstanding receivable. Revenue from leases where collection is deemed to be not probable is recorded on a cash basis until collectability becomes probable. Management’s estimate of the collectability of lease-related receivables is based on the best information available at the time of estimate. The Company does not use a general reserve approach and lease-related receivables are adjusted and taken against rental and other property income only when collectability becomes not probable.
During the year ended December 31, 20172020, the Company identified certain tenants where collection was no longer considered probable. For these tenants, the Company made the determination to record revenue on a cash basis and wrote off total outstanding receivables of $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, which included $206,000 of straight-line rental income and $1.0 million related to certain tenant reimbursements that were written off during the Company had an allowance for uncollectible accountsyear ended December 31, 2020. These write-offs reduced rental and other property income during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Revenue from lending activities
Interest income from the Company’s loans held-for-investment and real estate-related securities is comprised of $1.5 millioninterest earned on loans and $221,000, respectively.the accretion and amortization of net loan origination fees and discounts. Interest income on loans is accrued as earned, with the accrual of interest suspended when the related loan becomes a nonaccrual loan. Interest income on the Company’s broadly syndicated loans is accrued as earned beginning on the settlement date.
Income Taxes
The Company elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code, of 1986, as amended, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2012. The Company will generally not be subject to federal corporate income tax to the extent it distributes its taxable income to its stockholders, and so long as it, among other things, distributes at least 90% of its annual taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains). REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if the Company maintains its qualification for taxation as a REIT, it or its subsidiaries may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.
F-18

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Earnings (Loss) and Distributions Per Share
Earnings (loss) per share are calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period presented. Diluted income (loss) per share considers the effect of any potentially dilutive share equivalents, of which the Company had none0ne for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 or 2015.2018. Distributions per share are calculated based on the authorized daily distribution rate.
Reportable SegmentSegments
The Company’s commercialDuring the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company realigned the business and reportable segment information to reflect how the chief operating decision makers regularly review and manage the business and determined that it has 2 reportable segments:
Credit — engages primarily in acquiring and originating loans related to real estate assets consist ofassets. The Company may acquire first and second lien mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, bridge loans, wraparound mortgage loans, construction mortgage loans on real property and loans on leasehold interest mortgages. This segment also includes investments in CMBS and broadly syndicated loans.
Real estate — engages primarily in acquiring and managing income-producing necessity retail properties that are primarily single-tenant properties or anchored shopping centers, which are leased to creditworthy tenants under long-term net leases. The commercial properties are geographically diversified throughout the United States and have similar economic characteristics. The Company’s management evaluates operating performance on an overall portfolio level; therefore, the Company’s properties are one reportable segment.
See Note 17 — Segment Reporting for a further discussion regarding these segments.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by various standard setting bodies that may have an impact on the Company’s accounting and reporting. Except as otherwise stated below, the Company is currently evaluating the effect that certain of these new accounting requirements may have on the Company’s accounting and related reporting and disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements:statements.
In May 2014,June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”(the “FASB”) issued ASU 2016-13, which was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326,Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASU 2014-09”2018-19”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition, Accounting Standards Codification  (“ASC”) (Topic 605) and will require an entity to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For public business entities, the guidance should be applied to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. In accordance with the Company’s plan for the adoption of ASU 2014-09, the Company’s implementation team has identified all of the Company’s revenue streams and real estate sales and concluded that upon adoption, there will not be a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. In addition, the Company evaluated controls around the implementation of ASU 2014-09 and has concluded there will be no significant impact on the Company’s control structure.
In February 2016,November 2018. Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“2019-04, ASU 2016-02”), which will require that a lessee recognize assetsNo. 2019-05, ASU No. 2019-10, ASU No. 2019-11 and liabilitiesASU No. 2020-02 to provide additional guidance on the balance sheet for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months, with the result being the recognition of a right of use asset and a lease liabilitycredit losses standard. ASU 2016-13 and the disclosure of key information about the entity’s leasing arrangements. The lessor accounting model under ASU 2016-02 is similar to current guidance; however it limits the capitalization of initial direct leasing costs, such as internally generated costs. ASU 2016-02 retains a distinction between finance leases (i.e., capital leases under current GAAP) and operating leases. The amendments in ASU 2016-02related updates are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required for existing leases that have not expired upon adoption and provides

F-15

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


for certain practical expedients. The Company is still evaluating the full impact of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements; however, the Company plans to adopt ASU 2016-02 as of January 1, 2019 and anticipates that it will elect a practical expedient offered in ASU 2016-02 that allows an entity to not reassess the following upon adoption (elected as a group): (i) whether an expired or existing contract contains a lease arrangement; (ii) lease classification related to expired or existing lease arrangements; or (iii) whether costs incurred on expired or existing leases qualify as initial direct costs. As a result of the adoption, all leases for which we are the lessee, including ground leases (if any), will be recorded on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as either financing leases or operating leases with a related right of use asset and lease liability. In addition, certain executory and non-lease components, such as common area maintenance, may need to be accounted for separately from the lease component of the lease. Lease components will continue to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and certain non-lease components will be accounted for under the new revenue recognition guidance in ASU 2014-09 as mentioned above. In January 2018, the FASB proposed amending Topic 842 to allow lessors the option to combine lease and non-lease components when certain criteria are met.
ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments (Subtopic 825-10) (“ASU 2016-01”)— The amendments in this update require all equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee). The amendments in this update also require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income (loss), the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. In addition, the amendments in this update require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the consolidated balance sheets or the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company will adopt ASU 2016-01 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 and does not expect it will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses(Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 is intended to improve financial reporting requiring more timely recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income, including loans held for investment, held-to-maturity debt securities, trade and other receivables, net investment in leases and other such commitments. ASU 2016-13 requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 require the Company to measure all expected credit losses based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets and eliminates the “incurred loss” methodology under current GAAP. ASU 2018-19 clarified that receivables arising from operating leases are not within the scope of Topic 326. Instead, impairment of receivables arising from operating leases should be accounted for in accordance with ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASC 842”). ASU 2016-13 isand ASU 2018-19 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019. EarlyThe Company adopted ASU 2016-13 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. See Note 7 — Loans Held-For-Investment for a further discussion on the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”). This ASU amends and removes several disclosure requirements including the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 also modifies some disclosure requirements and requires additional disclosures for changes in unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements and requires the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The provisions of ASU 2018-13 are effective January 1, 2020 using a prospective transition method for amendments effecting changes in unrealized gains and losses, significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements and narrative description on uncertainty of measurements. The remaining provisions of ASU 2018-13 are to be applied retrospectively, and early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2018-13 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2020 and has concluded that there is currently evaluating theno material impact this amendment will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which is intended to address diversity in practice related to how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted, and requires retrospective adoption unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it is to be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 and has determined that this standard is relevant to its presentation of debt prepayment and debt extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination and proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims. Following the retrospective adoption of this standard, the Company reclassified $602,000 of contingent consideration payments made after a business combination from cash flows from financing activities to cash flows from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company also reclassified $788,000 and $15,000 of proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims from cash flows from operating activities to cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The remaining item did not have a material impact on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. In accordance with ASU 2016-18, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. The amendments of ASU 2016-18 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 during the fourth quarter of 2017 and applied the standard retrospectively for all periods presented. Accordingly, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company included restricted

F-16
F-19

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



cash within cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows and removed the change in restricted cash from cash flows from investing activities. This change resulted in an increase in cash flows from investing activities of $234,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016 and a decrease of $3.7 million in cash flows from investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015.
In February 2017,October 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASU 2017-05”), which clarifies the following: (1) nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty; (2) an entity should allocate consideration to each distinct asset by applying the guidance in Topic 606 on allocating the transaction price to performance obligations; and (3) entities are required to derecognize a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in substance nonfinancial asset in a partial sale transaction when it (a) does not have (or ceases to have) a controlling financial interest in the legal entity that holds the asset in accordance with Subtopic 810 and (b) transfers control of the asset in accordance with Topic 606. The adoption of this standard may result in higher gains on the sale of partial real estate interests, including contributions of nonfinancial assets to a joint venture or other noncontrolling investee, due to recognizing the full gain when the derecognition criteria are met and recording the retained noncontrolling interest at its fair value. ASU 2017-05 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The standard is applied prospectively to sales of nonfinancial assets on or after the adoption date. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2017-05 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach and does not expect it will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging2018-17, Consolidation (Topic 815)810): Targeted Improvements to AccountingRelated Party Guidance for Hedging Activities Variable Interest Entities (“ASU 2017-12”2018-17”). The targeted amendments in thisguidance changes the guidance for determining whether a decision-making fee is a variable interest. Under the new ASU, help simplify certain aspects of hedge accountingindirect interests held through related parties under common control will now be considered on a proportional basis when determining whether fees paid to decision makers and result in a more accurate portrayal ofservice providers are variable interests. Such indirect interests were previously treated the economics of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. Thissame as direct interests. ASU applies to the Company’s interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges. Upon adoption of this ASU, all changes in the fair value of highly effective cash flow hedges will be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income rather than recognized directly in earnings. Under current GAAP, the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of cash flow hedges is recognized directly in earnings. This eliminates the requirement to separately measure and disclose ineffectiveness for qualifying cash flow hedges. ASU 2017-122018-17 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach with early adoption permitted. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2017-122018-17 during the first quarter of fiscal year 20182020, and has concluded that there is no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2020, the FASB issued a question and answer document (the “Lease Modification Q&A”) focused on the application of lease accounting guidance to lease concessions provided as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the business disruptions and challenges severely affecting the global economy caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, many lessors may be required to provide rent deferrals and other lease concessions to lessees. While the lease modification guidance in ASC 842 addresses routine changes to lease terms resulting from negotiations between the lessee and the lessor, this guidance did not contemplate concessions being so rapidly executed to address the sudden liquidity constraints of some lessees arising from COVID-19 related impacts. Under existing lease guidance, the Company would have to determine, on a lease by lease basis, if a lease concession was the result of a new arrangement reached with the tenant (treated within the lease modification accounting framework) or if a lease concession was under the enforceable rights and obligations within the existing lease agreement (precluded from applying the lease modification accounting framework). The Lease Modification Q&A allows the Company, if certain criteria have been met, to bypass the lease by lease analysis, and instead elect to either apply the lease modification accounting framework or not, with such election applied consistently to leases with similar characteristics and similar circumstances. 
The Company has elected to apply this guidance to avoid performing a lease by lease analysis for the lease concessions that (1) were granted as relief due to COVID-19 related impacts and (2) result in the cash flows remaining substantially the same or less than the original contract and will account for these lease concessions as if no changes were made to the leases. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company provided lease concessions, either in the form of rental deferrals or abatements, to certain tenants in response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on those tenants. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had granted rent deferrals of $4.8 million. The deferral of rental payments affects the timing, but not the amount, of the lease payments and resulted in an increase of $4.8 million to the Company’s lease-related receivables balance as of December 31, 2020. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, the Company had granted rental abatements of $407,000.
In addition, the Company entered into lease amendments during the year ended December 31, 2020 that provided for lease concessions, through rent abatements or rent deferrals, that represented substantive changes to the consideration in the original lease. These lease amendments extended the lease periods ranging from 12 months to 84 months. For these leases, the Company applied the lease modification accounting framework pursuant to ASC 842. As of December 31, 2020, these lease amendments resulted in rent abatements of $3.7 million and deferred rental income of $1.3 million.
As of March 24, 2021, the Company has collected approximately 98% of rental payments billed to tenants during the three months ended December 31, 2020.
In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) (“ASU 2021-01”). The amendments in ASU 2021-01 clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivative instruments that use an interest rate for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment that is modified as a result of the discontinuation of the use of LIBOR as a benchmark interest rate due to reference rate reform. ASU 2021-01 is effective immediately for all entities with the option to apply retrospectively as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, and can be applied prospectively to any new contract modifications made on or after January 7, 2021. The Company currently uses LIBOR as its benchmark interest rate for its derivative instruments, and has not entered into any new contracts on or after the effective date of ASU 2021-01. The Company is evaluating the impact of this ASU’s adoption, and does not expect that itbelieve this ASU will have a material impact on the Company’sits consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
GAAP defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. GAAP emphasizes that fair value is intended to be a market-based measurement, as opposed to a transaction-specific measurement.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. Depending on the nature of
F-20

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

the asset or liability, various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate the fair value. Assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy, as follows:
Level 1 — Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is defined as a market in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 — Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active (markets with few transactions), inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs, which are only used to the extent that observable inputs are not available, reflect the Company’s assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability.
The following describes the methods the Company uses to estimate the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities:

Real estate-related securities — The Company generally determines the fair value of its real estate-related securities by utilizing broker-dealer quotations, reported trades or valuation estimates from pricing models to determine the reported price. Pricing models for real estate-related securities are generally discounted cash flow models that usually consider the attributes applicable to a particular class of security (e.g., credit rating, seniority), current market data, and estimated cash flows for each class and incorporate deal collateral performance such as prepayment speeds and default rates, as available. Depending upon the significance of the fair value inputs used in determining these fair values, these securities are valued using either Level 2 or Level 3 inputs. As of December 31, 2020, the Company concluded that $27.5 million of real estate-related securities fell under Level 2 and $10.7 million of real estate-related securities fell under Level 3.
F-17

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


NotesCredit facilities and notes payable and credit facility— The fair value is estimated by discounting the expected cash flows based on estimated borrowing rates available to the Company as of the measurement date. Current and prior period liabilities’ carrying and fair values exclude net deferred financing costs. These financial instruments are valued using Level 2 inputs. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was $2.48$2.14 billion, compared to thea carrying value of $2.49$2.15 billion. The estimated fair value of the Company’s debt as of December 31, 20162019 was $2.25$1.60 billion, compared to thea carrying value of $2.26$1.61 billion.
Derivative instruments — The Company’s derivative instruments are comprised of interest rate swaps. All derivative instruments are carried at fair value and are valued using Level 2 inputs. The fair value of these instruments is determined using interest rate market pricing models. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated into the fair values to account for the Company’s potential nonperformance risk and the performance risk of the respective counterparties.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with those derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the Company’s derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Contingent consideration arrangementsLoans held-for-investment — The contingent consideration arrangementsCompany’s loans held-for-investment are carriedrecorded at fair valuecost upon origination and are valued using Level 3 inputs.adjusted by net loan origination fees and discounts. The Company estimates the fair value of additionalits loans held-for-investment by performing a present value analysis for the anticipated future cash flows using an appropriate market discount rate taking into consideration paid in connection with the acquisition of properties subject to contingent consideration arrangements is determined based on key assumptions, including, but not limited to, rental rates, discount rates and the estimated timing and probability of successfully leasing vacant space subsequent to the Company’s acquisition of certain properties. 
Revenue bondscredit risk. The fair value estimates of the Company’s revenue bonds are based on assumptions that management believes market participants would use in pricing, using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the bonds, including the period to maturity, and uses unobservable market-based inputs, including discount rates ranging from 7.75% to 9.0%. As a result, the Company has determined that its revenue bondsCRE loans held-for-investment are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s broadly syndicated loans are classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the number of market quotations or indicative prices from pricing services that are available, and whether the depth of the market is sufficient to transact at those prices in amounts approximating the Company’s investment position at the measurement date. As of December 31, 2017,2020, $359.6 million and $114.1 million of the Company’s broadly syndicated loans were classified in Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, the estimated fair value of the Company’s revenue bondsloans held-for-investment and related receivables, net was $2.1$907.8 million, compared to its carrying value of $892.3 million. As of December 31, 2019, the estimated fair value of the Company’s loans held-for-investment was $302.0 million, compared to its carrying value of $301.6 million.
F-21

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Other financial instruments — The Company considers the carrying values of its cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses, other liabilities, due to affiliates and distributions payable to approximate their fair values because of the short period of time between their origination and their expected realization as well as their highly-liquid nature. Due to the short-term maturities of these instruments, Level 1 inputs are utilized to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments.
Considerable judgment is necessary to develop estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize, or be liable for, upon disposition of the financial assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, there have been no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between fair value hierarchy levels.

F-18

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis


In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following tables show the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in thousands):
Balance as of
December 31, 2020
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial assets:
CMBS$38,194 $$27,461 $10,733 
Total financial assets$38,194 $$27,461 $10,733 
Financial liabilities:
Interest rate swaps$(12,308)$$(12,308)$
Total financial liabilities$(12,308)$$(12,308)$
  
Balance as of
December 31, 2019
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial assets:
Interest rate swaps$261 $$261 $
Total financial assets$261 $$261 $
Financial liability:
Interest rate swap$(4,181)$$(4,181)$
Total financial liability$(4,181)$$(4,181)$
 Balance as of
December 31, 2017
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial assets:       
Interest rate swaps$7,324
 $
 $7,324
 $
Total financial assets$7,324
 $
 $7,324
 $
Financial liabilities:       
Interest rate swaps$(206) $
 $(206) $
Total financial liabilities$(206) $
 $(206) $
        
        
  
Balance as of
December 31, 2016
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial assets:       
Interest rate swaps$2,327
 $
 $2,327
 $
Total financial assets$2,327
 $
 $2,327
 $
Financial liabilities:       
Interest rate swaps$(3,351) $
 $(3,351) $
Contingent consideration(337) 
 
 (337)
Total financial liabilities$(3,688) $
 $(3,351) $(337)
The following are reconciliations of the changes in liabilitiesfinancial assets with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 20162020 (in thousands):
  Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Beginning Balance, December 31, 2016 $(337)
Purchases and, fair value adjustments and payments made:  
Purchases 2,081
Fair value adjustments 337
Payments received (14)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2017 $2,067
  Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Beginning Balance, December 31, 2015 $(4,538)
Purchases and, fair value adjustments and payments made:  
Purchases (332)
Fair value adjustments 2,667
Payments made 1,866
Ending Balance, December 31, 2016 $(337)

F-19

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


CMBS
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2020$
Total gains and losses:
Unrealized gain included in other comprehensive income, net747 
Purchases and payments received:
Purchases26,883 
Premiums (discounts), net(16,875)
Principal payments received(22)
Ending Balance, December 31, 2020$10,733 
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis (Including Impairment Charges)
Certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment. The Company’s process for identifying and recording impairment related to real estate assets and intangible assets is discussed in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
F-22

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

As discussed in Note 4 — Real Estate Assets, during the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, real estate assets related to four12 properties totaling approximately 33,000 square feet were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to an estimated fair value of $4.3$86.4 million, resulting in impairment charges of $2.9$16.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, real estate assets related to three34 properties totaling approximately 24,000 square feet were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to an estimated fair value of $4.7$384.4 million, resulting in impairment charges of $6.7$72.9 million. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, real estate assets related to one retail property totaling approximately 11,000 square feet22 properties were deemed to be impaired and itstheir carrying value wasvalues were reduced to an estimated fair value of $1.3$332.4 million, resulting in impairment charges of $1.4$33.0 million. The Company estimates fair values using Level 3 inputs and using a combined income and market approach, specifically using discounted cash flow analysis and recent comparable sales transactions. The evaluation of real estate assets for potential impairment requires the Company’s management to exercise significant judgment and to make certain key assumptions, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) terminal capitalization;capitalization rates; (2) discount rates; (3) the number of years the property will be held; (4) property operating expenses; and (5) re-leasing assumptions, including the number of months to re-lease, market rental income and required tenant improvements. There are inherent uncertainties in making these estimates such as market conditions and the future performance and sustainability of the Company’s tenants.The Company determined that the selling prices used to determine the fair values were Level 2 inputs.
The following summarizes the ranges of discount rates and terminal capitalization rates used for the Company’s impairment test for the real estate assets during theyear ended December 31, 2020:
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Discount RateTerminal Capitalization Rate
7.9% - 9.7%7.4% - 9.2%
The following table presents the impairment charges by asset class recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Asset class impaired:
Land$3,738 $12,648 $6,436 
Buildings, fixtures and improvements12,310 56,572 25,299 
Intangible lease assets737 4,056 1,385 
Intangible lease liabilities(48)(337)(145)
Total impairment loss$16,737 $72,939 $32,975 
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Asset class impaired:      
Land $725
 $1,775
 $498
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 1,734
 4,678
 662
Intangible lease assets 396
 284
 280
Total impairment loss $2,855
 $6,737
 $1,440
NOTE 4 — REAL ESTATE ASSETS
20172020 Property Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company acquired 42150 commercial properties, including 146 properties acquired in connection with the Mergers, for an aggregate purchase price of $307.4$798.5 million (the “2017“2020 Property Acquisitions”), of which 38 were determined to be asset acquisitions and four were accounted for as business combinations as they were acquired prior to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-01 in April 2017. The Company funded the 2017 Acquisitions with net cash provided by operations and available borrowings.
The following table summarizes the consideration transferred for the properties purchased during the year ended December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
 2017 Acquisitions
Real estate assets: 
Purchase price of asset acquisitions$251,999
Purchase price of business combinations55,386
Total purchase price of real estate assets acquired (1)
$307,385
______________________
(1)The weighted average amortization period for the 2017 Acquisitions is 16.9 years for acquired in-place leases and other intangibles, 13.6 years for acquired above-market leases and 8.5 years for acquired intangible lease liabilities.

F-20

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company acquired a 100% interest in 38 commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $252.0 million, which were accounted for as asset acquisitions (the “2017 Asset Acquisitions”). The aggregate purchase price includes $6.1$7.9 million of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalizedcapitalized. The Company funded the 2020 Property Acquisitions acquired in accordanceconnection with ASU 2017-01. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, costs related to propertyMergers with the Merger Consideration, and funded the remaining acquisitions were expensed as incurred. with proceeds from real estate dispositions and available borrowings.
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation for the 2017 Asset2020 Property Acquisitions purchased during the year ended December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
2020 Property Acquisitions
Land$166,395 
Buildings, fixtures and improvements571,777 
Acquired in-place leases and other intangibles (1)
74,888 
Acquired above-market leases (2)
2,367 
Intangible lease liabilities (3)
(16,927)
Total purchase price$798,500 
______________________
 2017 Asset Acquisitions
Land$32,919
Buildings, fixtures and improvements177,682
Acquired in-place leases and other intangibles39,257
Acquired above-market leases3,624
Revenue bonds2,081
Intangible lease liabilities(3,564)
Total purchase price$251,999
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company(1)    The amortization period for acquired a 100% interest in four commercial properties for an aggregate purchase price of $55.4 million, which were accounted for as business combinations (the “2017 Business Combination Acquisitions”). The Company allocated the purchase price of these properties to the fair value of the assets acquiredin-place leases and liabilities assumed. The following table summarizes the purchase price allocations for the 2017 Business Combination Acquisitions purchased during the year ended December 31, 2017 (in thousands):other intangibles is 8.9 years.
F-23
 2017 Business Combination Acquisitions
Land$9,873
Buildings, fixtures and improvements41,186
Acquired in-place leases and other intangibles5,974
Acquired above-market leases988
Intangible lease liabilities(2,635)
Total purchase price$55,386
The Company recorded revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $5.1 million and net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $708,000 related to the 2017 Business Combination Acquisitions. In addition, the Company recorded $1.3 million of acquisition-related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is included in acquisition-related expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.
The following information summarizes selected financial information of the Company as if all of the 2017 Business Combination Acquisitions were completed on January 1, 2016 for each period presented below. The table below presents the Company’s estimated revenue and net income, on a pro forma basis, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
Pro forma basis (unaudited):   
Revenue$424,416
 $412,883
Net income$80,912
 $71,301
The unaudited pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2017 was adjusted to exclude $1.3 million of acquisition-related fees and expenses recorded during the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the 2017 Business Combination Acquisitions. Accordingly, these costs were instead recognized in the unaudited pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2016.

F-21

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



(2)    The amortization period for acquired above-market leases is 6.5 years.
(3)    The unaudited pro forma informationamortization period for acquired intangible lease liabilities is presented for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the transactions occurred at the beginning of 2016, nor does it purport to represent the results of future operations.9.7 years.
20172020 Property Dispositions and Real Estate Asset Held for Sale
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company disposed of 1430 properties, consisting of 20 retail properties and one industrial property10 anchored shopping centers for an aggregate gross sales price of $100.6$270.4 million, resulting in net proceeds of $65.9$263.8 million after closing costs and the repayment of the $33.0 million variable rate debt secured by one of the disposed properties and a gain of $17.0 million. No disposition fees were paiddue to CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates, in connection with the saleand a recorded gain of the properties and the$27.5 million. The Company has no continuing involvement with these properties. The gain on sale of real estate is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate, net in the consolidated statements of operations.
2017As of December 31, 2020, there was 1 property classified as held for sale with a carrying value of $3.5 million included in assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company disposed of the property, as further discussed in Note 19 — Subsequent Events.
2020 Impairment of Properties
The Company performs quarterly impairment review procedures, primarily through continuous monitoring of events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying value of certain of its real estate assets may not be recoverable. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a discussion of the Company’s accounting policies regarding impairment of real estate assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, four2020, 12 properties totaling approximately 824,000 square feet with a carrying value of $7.2$103.1 million were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to an estimated fair value of $4.3$86.4 million, resulting in impairment charges of $2.9$16.7 million, which were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements for a further discussion regarding these impairment charges.
2016
2019 Property Acquisitions and Unconsolidated Joint VentureAcquisition
During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company acquired 15a 100% interest in 1 commercial propertiesproperty for an aggregate purchase price of $216.7$6.2 million (the “2016 Acquisitions”“2019 Property Acquisition”). The 2016 Acquisitions, which includes $165,000 of external acquisition-related expenses that were accounted for as business combinations.capitalized. The Company funded the 2016 Acquisitions2019 Property Acquisition with net proceeds from the DRIP Offeringsreal estate dispositions and available borrowings. The Company allocated the purchase price of these properties to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocationsallocation for the 2016 Acquisitions2019 Property Acquisition (in thousands):
  2016 Acquisitions
Land $48,317
Buildings, fixtures and improvements 149,859
Acquired in-place leases and other intangibles (1)
 18,100
Acquired above-market leases (2)
 3,764
Intangible lease liabilities (3)
 (3,388)
Total purchase price $216,652

(1)The weighted average amortization period for acquired2019 Property Acquisition
Land$1,501 
Buildings, fixtures and improvements3,804 
Acquired in-place leases and other intangibles was 7.6 years for the 2016 Acquisitions.(1)
860 
(2)The weighted average amortization period for acquired above-market leases was 6.0 years for the 2016 Acquisitions.
(3)Total purchase priceThe weighted average amortization period for acquired intangible lease liabilities was 6.4 years for the 2016 Acquisitions.$6,165 
______________________
(1)    The amortization period for acquired in-place leases and other intangibles is 20.1 years.
2019 Property Dispositions and Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
 On September 3, 2019, certain subsidiaries of the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”) with Realty Income Corporation (NYSE: O) (the “Purchaser”), an unaffiliated company, to sell approximately 452 single-tenant properties, including 9 properties previously owned through the Consolidated Joint Venture, encompassing approximately 5.1 million gross rentable square feet of commercial space across 41 states. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the sale of 444 properties closed in December 2019 for total consideration of $1.2 billion, including the assumption by the Purchaser of existing mortgage debt totaling $130.8 million and the repayment of $532.3 million in debt, as further discussed in Note 9 — Credit Facilities, Notes Payable and Repurchase Facilities. The remaining properties closed subsequent to December 31, 2019, for consideration of $26.3 million, as discussed in “2020 Property Dispositions” above.
During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company acquired the joint venture partner’s (the “Unconsolidated Joint Venture Partner”) approximately 10% interest indisposed of a multi-tenanttotal of 497 properties, consisting of 482 retail properties, 1 industrial property comprising 176,000 rentable square feetand 14 anchored shopping centers, excluding a related outparcel of commercial space (the “Unconsolidated Joint Venture”). The Company has determined that this transaction qualified as a business combination to be accountedland, for under the acquisition method. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of this transaction were recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at their estimated fair value as of the acquisition date. The fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and equity interests were estimated using significant assumptions consistent with the Company’s policy concerning the allocation of the purchasean aggregate gross sales price of real estate assets, including current market rental rates, rental growth rates, capitalization$1.65 billion, resulting in net proceeds of $1.40 billion after closing costs and discount rates, interest rates and other variables. The results of this transaction are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations beginning September 22, 2016.

disposition fees due to CMFT
F-22
F-24

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



Management or its affiliates, and a recorded gain of $180.7 million. The Company has no continuing involvement with these properties. The gain on sale of real estate is included in gain on disposition of real estate, net in the consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2019, there were 29 properties classified as held for sale with a carrying value of $351.9 million included in assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had mortgage notes payable of $126.7 million that are related to the held for sale properties, which the Company expects to repay in connection with the disposition of the underlying held for sale properties.
2019 Impairment
During the year ended December 31, 2019, 34 properties totaling approximately 3.4 million square feet with a carrying value of $457.3 million were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to an estimated fair value of $384.4 million, resulting in impairment charges of $72.9 million, which were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements for a further discussion regarding these impairment charges.
2018 Property Acquisition
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company acquired a 100% interest in 1 commercial property for an aggregate purchase price of $11.9 million (the “2018 Acquisition”), which includes $277,000 of external acquisition-related expenses that were capitalized. The Company funded the 2018 Acquisition with net cash provided by operations and available borrowings.
The following table summarizes the transaction related topurchase price allocation for the business combination, including the amounts recognized for assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as indicated2018 Acquisition (in thousands):
2018 Acquisition
Land$2,107 
Buildings, fixtures and improvements9,044 
Acquired in-place leases and other intangibles (1)
1,392 
Intangible lease liabilities (2)
(638)
Total purchase price$11,905 
______________________
 September 22, 2016
Carrying value of the Company’s equity interest before business combination (1)
$18,952
Fair value of amounts recognized for assets acquired and liabilities assumed: 
Land4,535
Buildings, fixtures and improvements11,826
Acquired in-place leases and other intangibles1,296
Acquired above-market leases1,130
Intangible lease liabilities(597)
Other assets and liabilities115
Total net assets18,305
Loss recognized on equity interest remeasured to fair value$(647)

(1)    Includes $1.6 million of cash paid to the Unconsolidated Joint Venture Partner.The amortization period for acquired in-place leases and other intangibles is 19.0 years.
(2)    The Company recorded revenueamortization period for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $10.7 million and a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $1.4 million related to the 2016 Acquisitions, as well as the acquisition of the Unconsolidated Joint Venture Partner’s approximately 10% interest in the Unconsolidated Joint Venture.acquired intangible lease liabilities is 19.0 years.
The following information summarizes selected financial information of the Company as if all of the 2016 Acquisitions, as well as the acquisitions of the Unconsolidated Joint Venture Partner’s approximately 10% interest in the Unconsolidated Joint Venture, were completed on January 1, 2015 for each period presented below. The table below presents the Company’s estimated revenue and net income, on a pro forma basis, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
Pro forma basis (unaudited):   
Revenue$418,798
 $389,780
Net income$74,052
 $64,662
The unaudited pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2016 was adjusted to exclude $4.2 million of acquisition-related fees and expenses recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016. Accordingly, these costs were instead recognized in the unaudited pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The unaudited pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the transactions occurred at the beginning of 2015, nor does it purport to represent the results of future operations.
20162018 Property Dispositions
During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, the Company disposed of four21 properties, consisting of 19 retail properties and one2 anchored shopping centercenters, excluding a related outparcel of land, for an aggregate gross sales price of $31.6$66.6 million, resulting in net proceeds of $30.8$49.1 million after closing costs and the repayment of the $15.0 million variable rate debt secured by one of the disposed properties and a gain of $2.9$6.3 million. NoDuring the year ended December 31, 2018, $478,000 was incurred for disposition fees were paid to CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates in connection with the sale of the properties and the Company has no continuing involvement with these properties. The gain on sale of real estate is included in gain (loss) on disposition of real estate, net in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.operations.
20162018 Impairment of Properties
During the year ended December 31, 2016, three2018, 22 properties totaling approximately 2.3 million square feet with a carrying value of $11.4$365.4 million were deemed to be impaired and their carrying values were reduced to an estimated fair value of $4.7$332.4 million, resulting in impairment charges of $6.7$33.0 million, which were recorded in the consolidated statementstatements of operations. See Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements for a further discussion onregarding these impairment charges.

F-25
F-23

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



2015 Property Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company acquired 111 commercial properties, including properties held in the Consolidated Joint Venture, for an aggregate purchase price of $615.8 million (the “2015 Acquisitions”). The 2015 Acquisitions were accounted for as business combinations. The Company funded the 2015 Acquisitions with net proceeds from the Initial DRIP Offering and available borrowings. The Company allocated the purchase price of these properties to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation for acquisitions purchased during the year ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
 December 31, 2015
Land$138,536
Buildings, fixtures and improvements393,918
Acquired in-place leases and other intangibles (1)
83,043
Acquired above-market leases (2)
6,485
Intangible lease liabilities (3)
(5,883)
Fair value adjustment of assumed note payable(253)
Total purchase price$615,846

(1)The weighted average amortization period for acquired in-place leases and other intangibles was 13.0 years for the 2015 Acquisitions.
(2)The weighted average amortization period for acquired above-market leases was 11.3 years for the 2015 Acquisitions.
(3)The weighted average amortization period for acquired intangible lease liabilities was 9.5 years for the 2015 Acquisitions.
The Company recorded revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 of $28.4 million and a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 of $6.3 million related to the 2015 Acquisitions.
The following information summarizes selected financial information of the Company as if all of the 2015 Acquisitions were completed on January 1, 2014 for each period presented below. The table below presents the Company’s estimated revenue and net income, on a pro forma basis, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2014
Pro forma basis (unaudited):   
Revenue$387,921
 $305,141
Net income$79,888
 $8,267
The unaudited pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2015 was adjusted to exclude $15.5 million of acquisition-related fees and expenses recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015. Accordingly, these costs were instead recognized in the unaudited pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The unaudited pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the transactions occurred at the beginning of 2014, nor does it purport to represent the results of future operations.
Development Project
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company acquired one land parcel, upon which a 1.6 million square foot industrial property was expected to be constructed. The land, acquired for an aggregate amount of $23.9 million, was excluded from the 2014 Acquisitions. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company substantially completed the development project and placed it in service. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a total investment of $102.8 million.
2015 Land Disposition
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company sold one undeveloped land parcel for a gross sales price of $1.1 million, resulting in net cash proceeds of $1.0 million to the Company and a loss of $108,000.

F-24

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


2015 Impairment of a Property
During the year ended December 31, 2015, a property with a carrying value of $2.7 million was deemed to be impaired and its carrying value was reduced to its estimated fair value of $1.3 million, resulting in impairment charges of $1.4 million, which were recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. See Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements for a further discussion on these impairment charges.
Consolidated Joint Venture
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had an interest in a Consolidated Joint Venture that owns and manages nine properties, with total assets of $52.3 million, which included $9.3 million of land, $42.0 million of buildings and improvements, and $5.6 million of intangible lease assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $5.2 million, and total liabilities of $780,000. The Consolidated Joint Venture does not have any debt outstanding as of December 31, 2017. The Company has the ability to control operating and financial policies of the Consolidated Joint Venture. There are restrictions on the use of these assets as the Company would generally be required to obtain the partner’s (the “Consolidated Joint Venture Partner”) approval in accordance with the joint venture agreement for any major transactions. The Company and the Consolidated Joint Venture Partner are subject to the provisions of the joint venture agreement, which includes provisions for when additional contributions may be required to fund certain cash shortfalls.
NOTE 5 — INTANGIBLE LEASE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Intangible lease assets and liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in thousands, except weighted average life remaining):
   As of December 31,
   2017 2016
In-place leases and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $166,874 and   
 $125,620, respectively (with a weighted average life remaining of 10.5 years   
 and 10.7 years, respectively)$355,683
 $364,038
Acquired above-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $25,626 and   
 $18,723, respectively (with a weighted average life remaining of 8.7 years and   
 8.9 years, respectively) 41,747
 44,768
   $397,430
 $408,806
As of December 31,
20202019
Intangible lease assets:
In-place leases and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $132,967 and $111,670, respectively (with a weighted average life remaining of 9.7 years and 10.4 years, respectively)$217,431 $164,724 
Acquired above-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $22,054 and $19,310, respectively (with a weighted average life remaining of 7.6 years and 7.9 years, respectively)17,112 17,423 
Total intangible lease assets, net$234,543 $182,147 
Intangible lease liabilities:
Acquired below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $31,933 and $25,800, respectively (with a weighted average life remaining of 7.5 years and 7.3 years, respectively)    $32,718 $20,523 
Amortization of the above-market leases is recorded as a reduction to rental revenue,and other property income, and amortization expense for the in-place leases and other intangibles is included in depreciation and amortization in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Amortization of below-market leases is recorded as an increase to rental and other property income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The following table summarizes the amortization expense related to the intangible lease assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 20152018 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015202020192018
In-place lease and other intangible amortization $46,602
 $45,944
 $41,612
In-place lease and other intangible amortization$23,262 $32,058 $45,559 
Above-market lease amortization $7,304
 $6,638
 $6,439
Above-market lease amortization$3,095 $4,315 $6,740 
Below-market lease amortizationBelow-market lease amortization$5,309 $6,253 $8,448 
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the estimated amortization expense relating to the intangible lease assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal yearsand liabilities is as follows (in thousands):
Amortization
Year Ending December 31,In-Place Leases and Other IntangiblesAbove-Market LeasesBelow-Market Leases
2021$30,108 $2,489 $5,499 
2022$27,756 $2,345 $4,770 
2023$24,547 $2,086 $4,101 
2024$21,317 $1,576 $3,138 
2025$17,534 $1,334 $2,779 
Thereafter$96,169 $7,282 $12,431 
Total$217,431 $17,112 $32,718 
NOTE 6 — REAL ESTATE-RELATED SECURITIES
  Amortization Expense
Year Ending December 31, In-Place Leases and Other Intangibles Above-Market Leases
2018 $42,416
 $6,319
2019 $38,585
 $5,236
2020 $36,251
 $4,660
2021 $32,823
 $4,037
2022 $30,676
 $3,706

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had investments in 4 CMBS investment securities with an aggregate estimated fair value of $38.2 million. The CMBS mature on various dates from January 2024 through March 2034 and have interest rates ranging from 4.0% to 13.0%. The following is a summary of the Company’s real estate-related securities as of December 31, 2020 (in thousands):
F-25
F-26

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



Real Estate-Related Securities
Amortized Cost BasisUnrealized GainFair Value
CMBS$37,047 $1,147 $38,194 
Total real estate-related securities$37,047 $1,147 $38,194 
The following table provides the activity for the real estate-related securities during the year ended December 31, 2020 (in thousands):
Amortized Cost BasisUnrealized GainFair Value
Real estate-related securities as of January 1, 2020
$$$
Face value of real estate-related securities acquired
91,440 — 91,440 
Premiums and discounts on purchase of real estate-related securities, net of acquisition costs
(14,796)— (14,796)
Amortization of discount (premium) on real estate-related securities57 — 57 
Principal payments received on real estate-related securities(2,571)— (2,571)
Sale of real estate-related securities(37,083)(510)(37,593)
Unrealized gain on real estate-related securities— 1,657 1,657 
Real estate-related securities as of December 31, 2020
$37,047 $1,147 $38,194 
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company invested $76.6 million in CMBS. During the same period, the Company sold $37.1 million in CMBS resulting in net proceeds of $37.6 million and a gain of $510,000. Unrealized gains and losses on real estate-related securities are recorded in other comprehensive (loss) income, with a portion of the amount subsequently reclassified into interest expense and other, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as securities are sold and gains and losses are recognized. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $1.7 million of unrealized gains on its real estate-related securities included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the accompanying consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.
The scheduled maturities of the Company’s real estate-related securities as of December 31, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):
Available-for-sale securities
Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value
Due within one year$$
Due after one year through five years27,061 27,461 
Due after five years through ten years
Due after ten years9,986 10,733 
Total$37,047 $38,194 
Actual maturities of real estate-related securities can differ from contractual maturities because borrowers on certain corporate credit securities may have the right to prepay their respective debt obligations at any time. In addition, factors such as prepayments and interest rates may affect the yields on such securities.
In estimating credit losses related to real estate-related securities, management considers a variety of factors, including (1) whether the Company has the intent to sell the impaired security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis, (2) whether the Company expects to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in fair value, and (3) whether the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had 0 credit losses related to real estate-related securities.
F-27

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

NOTE 67 — LOANS HELD-FOR-INVESTMENT
The Company’s loans held-for-investment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 (dollar amounts in thousands):
As of December 31,
20202019
Mezzanine loans$147,475 $146,060 
Senior loans341,546 152,820 
Total CRE loans-held-for-investment and related receivables, net489,021 298,880 
Broadly syndicated loans473,603 2,750 
Loans held-for-investment and related receivables, net$962,624 $301,630 
Less: Allowance for credit losses$(70,358)$
Total loans-held-for-investment and related receivable, net$892,266 $301,630 
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company invested $582.7 million in broadly syndicated loans. During the same period, the Company received $71.8 million of principal payments on broadly syndicated loans and sold $42.0 million of broadly syndicated loans, resulting in proceeds of $39.9 million after closing costs and a loss of $737,000. The loss was recorded as an increase to interest expense and other, net in the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $41.0 million of unsettled broadly syndicated loan purchases included in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $169.1 million of unfunded commitments related to CRE loans held-for-investment, the funding of which is subject to the satisfaction of borrower milestones. These commitments are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The following table details overall statistics for the Company’s loans held-for-investment as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 (dollar amounts in thousands):
CRE Loans (1) (2)
Broadly Syndicated Loans
As of December 31,As of December 31,
2020201920202019
Number of loans12 11 194 
Principal balance$481,438 $297,357 $477,777 $2,750 
Net book value$428,393 $298,880 $463,873 $2,750 
Weighted-average interest rate7.5 %8.9 %3.8 %4.5 %
Weighted-average maximum years to maturity2.22.94.95.2

(1)    As of December 31, 2020, 100% of the Company’s loans by principal balance earned a floating rate of interest, primarily indexed to U.S. dollar LIBOR.
(2)    Maximum maturity date assumes all extension options are exercised by the borrowers; however, the Company’s CRE loans may be repaid prior to such date.
F-28

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Activity relating to the Company’s loans held-for-investment portfolio was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Principal Balance
Deferred Fees / Other Items (1)
Loan Fees ReceivableNet Book Value
Balance, January 1, 2019$89,679 $(6,540)$6,623 $89,762 
Loan originations and acquisitions219,096 (417)1,085 219,764 
Principal repayments received(17,186)— — (17,186)
Capitalized interest (2)
8,546 — — 8,546 
Deferred fees and other items— (1,531)(166)(1,697)
Accretion and amortization of fees and other items— 2,441 — 2,441 
Balance, December 31, 2019$300,135 $(6,047)$7,542 $301,630 
Loan originations and acquisitions820,015 (5)820,015 
Cure payments receivable (3)
— 7,351 — 7,351 
Sale of loans(42,031)1,392 — (40,639)
Principal repayments received (4)
(119,443)— — (119,443)
Capitalized interest (2)
539 — — 539 
Deferred fees and other items— (8,969)(380)(9,349)
Accretion and amortization of fees and other items— 2,520 — 2,520 
Allowance for credit losses (5)
— (70,358)— (70,358)
Balance, December 31, 2020$959,215 $(74,116)$7,167 $892,266 
____________________________________
(1)Other items primarily consist of purchase discounts or premiums, accretion of exit fees and deferred origination expenses.
(2)Represents accrued interest on loans whose terms do not require a current cash payment of interest.
(3)Represents operating expenses related to the mezzanine loans paid by the Company on the borrower’s behalf in connection with the foreclosure proceedings that commenced during the year ended December 31, 2020, as further discussed below in “Allowance for Credit Losses.”
(4)Includes the repayment of a $40.8 million senior loan prior to the maturity date.
(5)Includes the initial allowance for credit losses against the loans held-for-investment recorded on January 1, 2020 and the increase in allowance for credit losses related to its loans held-for-investment during the year ended December 31, 2020, as further discussed below in “Allowance for Credit Losses.”
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses reflects the Company’s current estimate of potential credit losses related to the loans held-for-investment included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion of the Company’s allowance for credit losses.
F-29

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following table presents the activity in the Company’s allowance for credit losses by loan type for the year ended December 31, 2020 (dollar amounts in thousands):
Mezzanine LoansSenior LoansBroadly Syndicated LoansTotal
Allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2019$$$$
Transition adjustment on January 1, 20201,494 468 40 2,002 
Provision for credit losses13,047 341 4,389 17,777 
Allowance for credit losses as of March 31, 202014,541 809 4,429 19,779 
Provision for credit losses6,728 (317)1,494 7,905 
Allowance for credit losses as of June 30, 202021,269 492 5,923 27,684 
Provision for credit losses3,601 1,390 2,364 7,355 
Allowance for credit losses as of September 30, 202024,870 1,882 8,287 35,039 
Provision for credit losses33,168 708 1,443 35,319 
Allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2020$58,038 $2,590 $9,730 $70,358 
The Company’s initial allowance for credit losses against the loans held-for-investment of $2.0 million recorded on January 1, 2020 is reflected as a direct charge to retained earnings on the Company’s consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity; however, subsequent changes to the allowance for credit losses are recognized through net income on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a $68.4 million increase in allowance for credit losses related to its loans held-for-investment, bringing the total allowance for credit losses to $70.4 million as of December 31, 2020.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the borrower on the Company’s 8 mezzanine loans, which represents approximately 3.3% of total assets as of December 31, 2020, became delinquent on certain required reserve payments. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, the borrower remained delinquent on the required reserve payments and became delinquent on principal and interest. Additionally, during the three months ended June 30, 2020, the fair value of the collateral, which is based on comparable market sales, further decreased compared to the amortized cost basis. During the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company commenced foreclosure proceedings to take control of the condominium properties in New York securing the mezzanine loans. As a result of this activity related to the Company’s mezzanine loans, the Company recorded a net increase to its provision for credit losses on the 4 loans of $58.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 to reflect the estimated fair value of the collateral, which included a $7.4 million provision for credit losses associated with a cure payments receivable for operating expenses paid by the Company on the borrower’s behalf during the year ended December 31, 2020. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company completed foreclosure proceedings to take control of the properties securing its mezzanine loans, as discussed in Note 19 — Subsequent Events.
As further described in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company evaluates its loans-held-for-investment portfolio on a quarterly basis. Each quarter, the Company assesses the risk factors of each loan, and assigns a risk rating based on several factors. Factors considered in the assessment include, but are not limited to, loan and credit structure, current LTV, debt yield, collateral performance, and the quality and condition of the sponsor, borrower, and guarantor(s). Loans are rated “1” (less risk) through “5” (greater risk), which ratings are defined in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
F-30

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The Company’s primary credit quality indicator is its risk ratings, which are further discussed above. The following table presents the net book value of the Company’s loans-held-for-investment portfolio as of December 31, 2020 by year of origination, loan type, and risk rating (dollar amounts in thousands):
Amortized Cost of Loans Held-For-Investment by Year of Origination (1)
As of December 31, 2020
Number of Loans202020192018Total
Mezzanine loans by internal risk rating:
10$$$$
20
30
40
5857,045 90,430 147,475 
Total mezzanine loans857,045 90,430 147,475 
Senior loans by internal risk rating:
10
20
34225,822 115,724 341,546 
40
50
Total senior loans4225,822 115,724 341,546 
Broadly syndicated loans by internal risk rating:
10
236,880 6,880 
3189456,711 2,739 459,450 
427,273 7,273 
50
Total broadly syndicated loans194470,864 2,739 473,603 
Less: Allowance for credit losses(70,358)
Total loans-held-for-investment and related receivables, net206$892,266 
Weighted Average Risk Rating (2)
3.3 

(1)Date loan was originated or acquired by the Company. Origination dates are subsequently updated to reflect material loan modifications.
(2)Weighted average risk rating calculated based on carrying value at period end.
NOTE 8 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
In the normal course of business, the Company uses certain types of derivative instruments for the purpose of managing or hedging its interest rate risk. During the year ended December 31, 2020, 1 of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements was partially terminated prior to the maturity date, resulting in a loss of $97,000. The loss was recorded as an increase to interest expense and other, net included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company assumed two interest rate swap agreements in connection with the Mergers. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had 12 executed5 interest rate swap agreements. agreements designated as hedging instruments.
F-31

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following table summarizes the terms of the Company’s 11 interest rate swap agreements designated as hedging instruments effective as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (dollar amounts in thousands):
            
    Outstanding Notional       Fair Value of Assets and (Liabilities)
 Balance Sheet Amount as of Interest Effective Maturity December 31, December 31,
 Location December 31, 2017 
Rates (1)
 Dates Dates 2017 2016
Interest Rate SwapsDerivative assets, prepaid expenses, revenue bonds and other assets $990,066
 2.55% to 3.91% 8/20/2013 to 9/01/2016 8/15/2018 to 7/01/2021 $4,717
 $2,327
Interest Rate SwapsDeferred rental income and other liabilities $38,737
 4.14% to 4.75% 6/24/2013 to 8/23/2013 6/24/2018 to 8/24/2020 $(206) $(3,351)
   Outstanding Notional  Fair Value of Liabilities as of
Balance SheetAmount as ofInterestEffectiveMaturityDecember 31,December 31,
LocationDecember 31, 2020
Rates (1)
DatesDates2020
2019 (2)
Interest Rate SwapsDerivative liabilities, deferred rental income and other liabilities$1,085,266 

2.55%
to
4.50%
6/29/2016 to
5/27/2020
3/15/2021
to
3/27/2023
$(12,308)$(4,181)

(1)
(1)The interest rates consist of the underlying index swapped to a fixed rate and the applicable interest rate spread as of December 31, 2017.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company entered into one interest rate swap agreement associated with a $811.7 million notional amount, effective on August 15, 2018. The following table summarizes the terms of this interest rate swap agreement designated as a hedging instrument as of December 31, 20172020.
(2)As of December 31, 2019, the Company had 2 interest rate swap agreements in an asset position with a notional amount of $60.0 million and 2016 (dollar amountsa fair value of $261,000 included in thousands):prepaid expenses and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
    Outstanding Notional       Fair Value of Asset
 Balance Sheet Amount as of Interest Effective Maturity December 31, December 31,
 Location December 31, 2017 
Rate (1)
 Date Date 2017 2016
Interest Rate SwapDerivative assets, prepaid expenses, revenue bonds and other assets $811,666
 3.77% 8/15/2018 3/15/2021 $2,607
 $

(1)The interest rate consists of the underlying index swapped to a fixed rate and the applicable interest rate spread as of December 31, 2017.
Additional disclosures related to the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments are included in Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements. The notional amount under the interest rate swap agreements is an indication of the extent of the Company’s involvement in each instrument, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks.
Accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on the intended use and designation of the derivative instrument. The Company designated the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in order to hedge the variability of the anticipated cash flows on its variable rate debt. The change in fair value of the effective portion of the derivative instruments that are designated as hedges is recorded in other comprehensive (loss) income, (loss), with a portion of the amount subsequently reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable rate debt. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the amount of loss reclassified from other comprehensive (loss) income as an increase to interest expense was $12.3 million. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019 and 2015,2018, the amountsamount of gains reclassified were $3.1 million, $8.8from other comprehensive (loss) income as a decrease to interest expense was $3.5 million and $6.5$4.3 million, respectively. The total unrealized loss on interest rate swaps of $12.3 million and $3.9 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and the total unrealized gain on interest rate swaps of $11.0 million as of December 31, 2018 is included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity. During the next 12 months, the Company estimates that an additional $2.0$3.3 million will be reclassified from other comprehensive (loss) income (loss) as an increase to interest expense.
Any ineffective portion The Company includes cash flows from interest rate swap agreements in net cash flows provided by operating activities on its consolidated statements of cash flows, as the change in fair value of the derivativeCompany’s accounting policy is to present cash flows from hedging instruments is recorded in interest expense. During the year ended December 31, 2017, $488,000 of the change in the fair valuesame category in its consolidated statements of cash flows as the interest rate swaps was considered ineffective. There were no portions ofcategory for cash flows from the change in the fair value of the interest rate swaps that were considered ineffective during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.hedged items.
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain provisions whereby if the Company defaults on certain of its unsecured indebtedness, the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations, resulting in an acceleration of payment. If the Company had breached any of these provisions, it could have been required to

F-26

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


settle its obligations under the agreements at their aggregate termination value, inclusive of interest payments and accrued interest of $227,000 at$13.1 million as of December 31, 2017.2020. In addition, the Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by its derivative counterparties. The Company believes it mitigates its credit risk by entering into agreements with creditworthy counterparties. The Company records credit risk valuation adjustments on its interest rate swaps based on the credit quality of the Company and the respective counterparty. There were no termination events or events of default related to the interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2017.2020.
NOTE 79 CREDIT FACILITIES, NOTES PAYABLE AND CREDIT FACILITYREPURCHASE FACILITIES
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had $2.5$2.1 billion of debt outstanding, including net deferred financing costs, with a weighted average years to maturity of 4.21.9 years and a weighted average interest rate of 3.6%3.4%. The weighted average years to maturity is computed using the scheduled repayment date as specified in each loan agreement where applicable. The weighted average interest rate is computed using the interest rate in effect until the scheduled repayment date. Should a loan not be repaid by its scheduled repayment date, the applicable interest rate will increase as specified in the respective loan agreement.
F-32

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following table summarizes the debt balances as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the debt activity for the year ended December 31, 20172020 (in thousands):
   During the Year Ended December 31, 2017  
 Balance as of December 31, 2016 
Debt Issuances and Assumptions (1)
 Repayments and Modifications Accretion and (Amortization) Balance as of December 31, 2017
Fixed rate debt$1,164,622
 $53,206
 $(451) $
 $1,217,377
Variable rate debt53,500
 
 (33,000) 
 20,500
Credit facility1,039,666
 1,519,500
 (1,308,166) 
 1,251,000
Total debt2,257,788
 1,572,706
 (1,341,617) 
 2,488,877
Net premiums (2)
506
 
 
 (87) 419
Deferred costs (3)
(12,035) (10,078) 717
(4) 
3,863
 (17,533)
Total debt, net$2,246,259
 $1,562,628
 $(1,340,900) $3,776
 $2,471,763
During the Year Ended December 31, 2020
 Balance as of December 31, 2019
Debt Issuances & Assumptions (1)
Repayments & Modifications (2)
Accretion & (Amortization)Balance as of December 31, 2020
Notes payable$726,261 $92,212 (5)$(240,377)$— $578,096 
Credit facilities885,000 629,025 (6)(177,525)— 1,336,500 
Repurchase facilities235,380 — 235,380 
Total debt1,611,261 956,617 (417,902)— 2,149,976 
Net premiums (3)
241 — — (92)149 
Deferred costs – credit facility (4)
(3,933)(1,440)(7)1,830 (3,543)
Deferred costs – fixed rate debt(2,709)— 186 (7)934 (1,589)
Total debt, net$1,604,860 $955,177 $(417,716)$2,672 $2,144,993 

(1)Includes deferred financing costs incurred during the period.
(2)Net premiums on mortgage notes payable were recorded upon the assumption of the respective debt instruments. Amortization of these net premiums is recorded as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective debt instruments using the effective-interest method.
(3)Deferred costs relate to mortgage notes payable and the term portion of the Credit Facility (as defined below).
(4)Includes $503,000 of deferred financing costs of the term portion of the Credit Facility written off during the period resulting from the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as defined below.
(1)Includes deferred financing costs incurred during the period.
(2)In connection with the repayment of certain mortgage notes, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2020.
(3)Net premiums on mortgage notes payable were recorded upon the assumption of the respective debt instruments. Amortization of these net premiums is recorded as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective debt instruments using the effective-interest method.
(4)Deferred costs related to the term portion of the CMFT Credit Facility (as defined below).
(5)Represents fixed rate debt assumed upon completion of the Mergers during the year ended December 31, 2020.
(6)Includes credit facility borrowings of $287.5 million assumed upon completion of the Mergers during the year ended December 31, 2020.
(7)Represents deferred financing costs written off during the period resulting from debt repayments prior to the respective maturity dates.
Notes Payable
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the fixed rate debt outstanding of $1.2 billion$578.1 million included $217.1$53.6 million of variable rate debt that is fixed through interest rate swap agreements, which has the effect of fixing the variable interest rates per annum through the maturity date of the variable rate debt. The fixed rate debt has interest rates ranging from 2.6% to 5.0% per annum. The fixed rate debt outstanding matures on various dates from June 2018April 2021 through October 2025.December 2024. Should a loan not be repaid by its scheduled repayment date, the applicable interest rate may increase as specified in the respective loan agreement. The aggregate balance of gross real estate assets, net of gross intangible lease liabilities, securing the fixed rate debt outstanding was $2.2 billion$981.8 million as of December 31, 2017.2020. Each of the mortgage notes payable comprising the fixed rate debt, is secured by the respective properties on which the debt was placed. As of December 31, 2017, the variable rate debt outstanding of $20.5 million had a weighted average interest rate of 4.6%.
Credit Facilities
The variable rate debt outstanding matures on February 26, 2020. With respect to the Company’s $24.2 million of debt maturing within the next year, the Company expects to use borrowings available under the Credit Facility or enter into new financing arrangements in order to meet its debt obligations. The aggregate balance of gross real estate assets, net of gross intangible lease liabilities, securing the variable rate debt outstanding was $40.8 million as of December 31, 2017.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company entered intohas a second amended and restated unsecured credit agreement (the “Second“CMFT Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent (“JPMorgan Chase”), and the other lenders party thereto that provides for borrowings of up to $1.40$1.24 billion as of December 31, 2020, which includes a $1.05 billionan $885.0 million unsecured term loan (the “Term“CMFT Term Loan”) and up to $350.0 million in unsecured revolving loans (the “Revolving“CMFT Revolving Loans” and collectively, with the CMFT Term Loan, the “Credit“CMFT Credit Facility”). The Term LoanCMFT Credit Facility matures on March 15, 2022 and the Revolving Loans mature on March 15, 2021; however, the Company has the right to extend the maturity date of the Revolving Loans to March 15, 2022.

F-27

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Depending upon the type of loan specified and overall leverage ratio, the CMFT Credit Facility bears interest at (i) the one-month, two-month, three-month or six-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)LIBOR multiplied by the statutory reserve rate (the “Eurodollar Rate”) plus an interest rate spread ranging from 1.65% to 2.25% or (ii) a base rate, ranging from 0.65% to 1.25%, plus the greater of: (a) JPMorgan Chase’s Prime Rate;prime rate; (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate (as defined in the CMFT Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus 0.50%; or (c) the one-month LIBOR multiplied by the statutory reserve rate plus 1.00%.
F-33

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

On December 21, 2020, as a result of the CCPT V Merger, a subsidiary of the Company assumed CCPT V’s obligations pursuant to the credit agreement by and among Cole Operating Partnership V, LP, the operating partnership of CCPT V (“CCPT V OP”), JPMorgan Chase, as administrative agent, and the lender parties thereto (the “CCPT V Credit Agreement”), including as guarantor under a guaranty provided by CCPT V, and as modified by a modification agreement dated as of May 31, 2018 and subsequently modified following the consummation of the CCPT V Merger by a second modification agreement on December 21, 2020. The CCPT V Credit Agreement allows for borrowings of up to $350.0 million (the “CCPT V Credit Facility”). The CCPT V Credit Facility includes $220.0 million in term loans (the “CCPT V Term Loans”) and up to $130.0 million in revolving loans (the “CCPT V Revolving Loans”). The CCPT V Credit Facility matures on March 15, 2022.
Depending upon the type of loan specified and overall leverage ratio, the CCPT V Credit Facility bears interest at (i) the one-month, two-month, three-month or six-month LIBOR multiplied by the statutory reserve rate (the “Adjusted LIBO Rate”) for the interest period plus an applicable rate ranging from 1.30% to 1.70%; or (ii) a base rate ranging from 0.30% to 0.70%, plus the greater of: (a) JPMorgan Chase’s Prime Rate (as defined in the CCPT V Credit Agreement); (b) the NYFRB Rate (as defined in the CCPT V Credit Agreement) plus 0.50%; or (c) the Adjusted LIBO Rate for a period of one month plus 1.0%.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, there were 0 amounts outstanding under the CMFT Revolving Loans outstanding totaled $201.0 million at a weighted average interest rate of 3.3%or the CCPT V Revolving Loans (collectively, the “Revolving Loans”). As of December 31, 2017,2020, the CMFT Term Loan and CCPT V Term Loans (collectively, the “Term Loans”) outstanding totaled $1.05$1.1 billion, $811.7 million$1.0 billion of which is subject to interest rate swap agreements (the “Swapped Term Loan”Loans”). The interest rate swap agreements had the effect of fixing the Eurodollar Rate per annum of the Swapped Term Loan. As of December 31, 2017, the weighted averageLoans at an all-in rate for the Swapped Term Loan was 3.2%of 3.9%. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had $1.25$1.1 billion outstanding under the CMFT Credit Facility and CCPT V Credit Facility (collectively, the “Credit Facilities”) at a weighted average interest rate of 3.2%3.7% and $148.4$480.0 million in unused capacity, subject to borrowing availability. The Company had available borrowings of $135.5 million as of December 31, 2020.
The CMFT Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement containsand the CCPT V Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Credit Agreements”) contain provisions with respect to covenants, events of default and remedies customary for facilities of this nature. In particular, the CMFT Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth greater than or equal to the sum of (i) $2.0$1.75 billion plus (ii) 75% ofunder the equity issued minus (iii) the aggregate amount of any redemptions or similar transaction from the date of theCMFT Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and a leverage ratio less than or equal to 60%,. The CCPT V Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth not less than $225.0 million plus 75% of the equity issued by the Company and a net leverage ratio less than or equal to 60%. Each of the Credit Agreements require the Company to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio greater than 1.50, an unsecured debt to unencumbered asset value ratio equal to or less than 60%, an unsecured debt service coverage ratio greater than 1.75, a secured debt ratio equal to or less than 40% and the amount of secured debt that is recourse debt at no greater than 15% of total asset value. The Company believes it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the CMFT Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and the CCPT V Credit Agreement, as well as the financial covenants under the Company’s various fixed and variable rate debt agreements, as of December 31, 2017.2020, with the exception of 1 mortgage note serviced by PNC Bank, N.A (“PNC Bank”) where the Company failed to meet the debt service coverage ratio covenant under the mortgage at December 31, 2020. Additionally, the Company previously failed to meet the debt service coverage ratio covenant under one mortgage note serviced by Wells Fargo, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) as of September 30, 2020, but subsequently passed and was in compliance with this covenant as of December 31, 2020. Pursuant to the loan agreements, non-compliance with the debt service coverage ratio covenant triggers a cash sweep of the underlying property’s operating cash flow, which was waived by PNC Bank during the year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, Wells Fargo had not initiated a cash sweep of the underlying property’s operating cash flow.
On December 31, 2019 (the “Closing Date”), CMFT Corporate Credit Securities, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary of the Company, entered into a revolving credit and security agreement (the “Credit and Security Agreement”) with the lenders from time to time parties thereto, Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”), as administrative agent, CMFT Securities Investments, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as equityholder and as collateral manager, Citibank (acting through its Agency & Trust division), as both a collateral agent and as a collateral custodian, and Virtus Group, LP, as collateral administrator. The Credit and Security Agreement provides for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount up to $500.0 million (the “Credit Securities Revolver”), which may be increased from time to time pursuant to the Credit and Security Agreement. As of December 31, 2020, the amounts borrowed and outstanding under the Credit Securities Revolver totaled $231.5 million at a weighted average interest rate of 1.9%.
Borrowings under the Credit and Security Agreement will bear interest equal to the three-month LIBOR for the relevant interest period, plus an applicable rate. The applicable rate is 1.70% per annum during the reinvestment period and 2.00% per annum during the amortization period (and, in each case, an additional 2.00% per annum following an event of default under the Credit and Security Agreement). The reinvestment period begins on the Closing Date and concludes on the earlier of (i) the
F-34

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

date that is three years after the Closing Date, (ii) the final maturity date and (iii) the date on which the total assets under management of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries is less than $1.25 billion (the “Reinvestment Period”). The final maturity date is the earliest to occur of: (i) the date that the Credit Securities Revolver is paid down and (ii) the second anniversary after the Reinvestment Period concludes. Borrowings under the Credit and Security Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets held by CMFT Corporate Credit Securities, LLC, which shall primarily consist of broadly-syndicated senior secured loans subject to certain eligibility criteria under the Credit and Security Agreement.
Repurchase Facilities
On June 4, 2020, CMFT RE Lending RF Sub CB, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Master Repurchase Agreement with Citibank (the “Citibank Repurchase Agreement”), which provides up to $300.0 million of financing primarily through Citibank’s purchase of the Company’s CRE mortgage loans and future funding advances (the “Citibank Repurchase Facility”). Additionally, on September 21, 2020, CMFT RE Lending RF Sub BB, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a second Master Repurchase Agreement with Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) (the “Barclays Repurchase Agreement”), which provides up to $500.0 million of financing primarily through Barclays’ purchase of the Company’s CRE mortgage loans and future funding advances (the “Barclays Repurchase Facility”, and collectively with the Citibank Repurchase Facility, the “Repurchase Facilities”). The Citibank Repurchase Agreement and the Barclays Repurchase Agreement (collectively, the “Repurchase Agreements”) provide for simultaneous agreements by Citibank and Barclays to re-sell such purchased CRE mortgage loans back to CMFT RE Lending RF Sub CB, LLC and CMFT RE Lending RF Sub BB, LLC (collectively, the “CMFT Lending Subs”) at a certain future date or upon demand. Advances under the Repurchase Agreements accrue interest at per annum rates based on the one-month LIBOR, plus a spread ranging from 2.00% to 2.40% to be determined on a case-by-case basis between Citibank or Barclays and the CMFT Lending Subs. The Repurchase Facilities mature on various dates between June 2023 and September 2023, with 2 one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Repurchase Agreements.
In connection with the Repurchase Agreements, the Company (as the guarantor) entered into guaranties with Citibank and Barclays (the “Guaranties”), under which the Company agreed to guarantee up to 25% of the CMFT Lending Subs’ obligations under the Repurchase Agreements. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had 4 senior loans with an aggregate carrying value of $341.5 million financed with $235.4 million under the Repurchase Facilities, $109.1 million of which was financed under the Barclays Repurchase Facility at a weighted average interest rate of 2.9%, and $126.3 million of which was financed under the Citibank Repurchase Facility at a weighted average interest rate of 2.3%.
The Repurchase Agreements and the Guaranties contain representations, warranties, covenants, conditions precedent to funding, events of default and indemnities that are customary for agreements of these types. In addition, the Guaranties contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain: (i) minimum liquidity of not less than the lower of (a) $50.0 million and (b) the greater of (A) $10.0 million and (B) 5% of the Company’s recourse indebtedness, as defined in the Guaranties; (ii) minimum consolidated net worth greater than or equal to $1.0 billion plus (a) 75% of the equity issued by the Company following the respective closing dates of the Repurchase Agreements (the “Repurchase Closing Dates”) minus (b) the aggregate amount of any redemptions or similar transaction by the Company from the Repurchase Closing Dates; (iii) maximum leverage ratio of total indebtedness to total equity less than or equal to 80%; and (iv) minimum interest coverage ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the Guaranties) to interest expense equal to or greater than 1.40. The Company believes it was in compliance with the financial covenants under the Repurchase Agreements as of December 31, 2020.
Maturities
Liquidity and Financial Condition — As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $1.2 billion of debt maturing within the next 12 months following the date these financial statements are issued. The Company expects to enter into new financing arrangements or refinance existing arrangements to meet its obligations as they become due, which management believes is probable based on the current loan-to-value ratios, the occupancy of the Company’s properties and assessment of the current lending environment. The Company believes cash on hand, proceeds from real estate asset dispositions, net cash provided by operations, borrowings available under the credit facilities or the entry into new financing arrangements will be sufficient to meet its obligations as they become due in the ordinary course of business for at least 12 months following the date these financial statements are issued.
F-35

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following table summarizes the scheduled aggregate principal repayments for the Company’s outstanding debt as ofsubsequent to December 31, 2017 for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and the period thereafter2020 (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,Principal Repayments
2021$138,210 
20221,134,391 
2023554,783 
2024322,592 
2025
Thereafter
Total$2,149,976 
Year Ending December 31,  Principal Repayments
2018$24,211
201949,799
2020333,215
2021301,603
20221,092,464
Thereafter687,585
Total$2,488,877
    
NOTE 8 — INTANGIBLE LEASE LIABILITIES
Intangible lease liabilities of the Company consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands, except weighted average life):
   As of December 31,
   2017 2016
Acquired below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $31,330    
 and $23,241, respectively (with a weighted average life remaining of 7.5    
 and 7.8 years, respectively) $45,572
 $49,075
Amortization of below-market leases is recorded as an increase to rental revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The following table summarizes the amortization of intangible lease liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Amortization of below-market leases $9,503
 $7,821
 $7,597

F-28

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


As of December 31, 2017, the estimated amortization of the intangible lease liabilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31, Amortization of Below-Market Leases
2018 $8,356
2019 $7,492
2020 $6,688
2021 $4,566
2022 $3,801
NOTE 910 — SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
Supplemental cash flow disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Distributions declared and unpaid$10,969 $16,510 $16,518 
Accrued capital expenditures$160 $1,165 $557 
Interest income capitalized to loans held-for-investment$539 $8,546 $384 
Common stock issued through distribution reinvestment plan$34,191 $82,388 $91,764 
Common stock issued in connection with the Mergers$384,319 $$
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps$727 $(14,913)$3,875 
Interest rate swaps assumed in the Mergers$(9,115)$$
Mortgage notes assumed by buyer in real estate disposition$$(205,765)$
Debt assumed in the Mergers$379,737 $$
Real estate assets acquired in the Mergers$761,326 $$
Assets assumed in the Mergers$4,424 $$
Liabilities assumed in the Mergers$6,389 $$
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures:
Interest paid$60,990 $97,418 $93,424 
Cash paid for taxes$1,243 $1,218 $1,475 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:     
Distributions declared and unpaid$16,531
 $16,498
 $16,568
Accrued capital expenditures$192
 $675
 $2,741
Common stock issued through distribution reinvestment plan$101,344
 $109,166
 $112,158
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps$7,654
 $4,335
 $(1,302)
Contingent consideration recorded upon property acquisitions$
 $332
 $2,880
Fair value of notes payable assumed in real estate acquisition$
 $
 $15,233
Consolidation of real estate joint venture$
 $18,305
 $
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures:     
Interest paid$85,140
 $74,034
 $54,388
NOTE 1011 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to litigation and claims. The Company is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the Company’s business, to which the Company is a party or of which the Company’s properties are the subject.
Unfunded Commitments
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $169.1 million of unfunded commitments related to its existing CRE loans held-for-investment. These commitments are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Unsettled Broadly Syndicated Loans
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $41.0 million of unsettled broadly syndicated loan acquisitions and $2.6 million of unsettled broadly syndicated loan sales, NaN of which settled subsequent to December 31, 2020. Unsettled acquisitions are included in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
F-36

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Environmental Matters
In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, the Company may potentially be liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. In addition, the Company may own or acquire certain properties that are subject to environmental remediation. Generally, the seller of the property, the tenant of the property and/or another third party is responsible for environmental remediation costs related to a property. Additionally, in connection with the purchase of certain properties, the respective sellers and/or tenants may agree to indemnify the Company against future remediation costs. The Company also carries environmental liability insurance on its properties that provides limited coverage for any remediation liability and/or pollution liability for third-party bodily injury and/or property damage claims for which the Company may be liable. The Company is not aware of any environmental matters which it believes are reasonably likely to have a material effect on its results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
NOTE 1112 — RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has incurred fees and expenses payable to CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management and certain of its affiliates in connection with the acquisition, management and disposition of its assets. On August 20, 2019, the Company and CMFT Management entered into an Amended and Restated Management Agreement (the “Management Agreement”), which amended and restated that certain Advisory Agreement between the parties dated January 24, 2012, as amended (the “Prior Advisory Agreement”). Following the effective date of the Management Agreement, CMFT Management is no longer entitled to receive the advisory fee, acquisition fees, subordinated performance fee, or disposition fees pursuant to the Prior Advisory Agreement, as described below; provided, however, that for the Company’s properties under contract to be sold or specifically identified in a broker agreement as being marketed for sale as of the effective date of the Management Agreement, CMFT Management may be entitled to receive a disposition fee in accordance with the terms of the Prior Advisory Agreement. In addition, CMFT Management generally shall continue to be entitled to reimbursement for costs and expenses to the extent incurred on behalf of the Company in accordance with the Management Agreement; provided, however, that the limits on reimbursement for organization and offering expenses, acquisition expenses and operating expenses as defined and provided in the Prior Advisory Agreement shall no longer be applicable. 
Management and investment advisory fees
Pursuant to the Management Agreement, beginning on August 20, 2019, the Company pays CMFT Management a management fee, payable quarterly in arrears, equal to the greater of (a) $250,000 per annum ($62,500 per quarter) and (b) 1.50% per annum (0.375% per quarter) of the Company’s Equity (as defined in the Management Agreement).
On December 6, 2019, CMFT Securities Investments, LLC (“CMFT Securities”), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an investment advisory and management agreement (the “Investment Advisory and Management Agreement”) with CIM Capital IC Management, LLC (the “Investment Advisor”). CMFT Securities was formed for the purpose of holding any securities investments made by the Company. The Investment Advisor, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIM, is registered as an investment advisor under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, the Investment Advisor manages the day-to-day business affairs of CMFT Securities and its investments in corporate credit and real estate-related securities (collectively, the “Managed Assets”), subject to the supervision of the Board. In connection with the services provided by the Investment Advisor, CMFT Securities pays the Investment Advisor an investment advisory fee (the “Investment Advisory Fee”), payable quarterly in arrears, equal to 1.50% per annum (0.375% per quarter) of CMFT Securities’ Equity (as defined in the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement). Because the Managed Assets are excluded from the calculation of management fees payable by the Company to CMFT Management pursuant to the Management Agreement, the total management and advisory fees payable by the Company to its external advisors are not increased as a result of the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement.
In addition, on December 6, 2019, the Investment Advisor entered into a sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with OFS Capital Management, LLC (the “Sub-Advisor”) to act as an investment sub-advisor to CMFT Securities. The Sub-Advisor is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act and is an affiliate of the Investment Advisor. The Sub-Advisor is responsible for providing investment management services with respect to the corporate credit-related securities held by CMFT Securities. On a quarterly basis, the Investment Advisor designates 50% of the sum of the Investment Advisory Fee and incentive compensation payable to the Investment Advisor as sub-advisory fees.
F-37

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Incentive compensation
Pursuant to the Management Agreement, beginning on August 20, 2019, CMFT Management is entitled to receive incentive compensation, payable with respect to each quarter, which is generally equal to the excess of (a) the product of (i) 20% and (ii) the excess of (A) Core Earnings (as defined in the Management Agreement) of the Company for the previous 12-month period, over (B) the product of (1) the Company’s Consolidated Equity (as defined in the Management Agreement) in the previous 12-month period, and (2) 7% per annum, over (b) the sum of any incentive compensation paid to CMFT Management with respect to the first three calendar quarters of such previous 12-month period (or such lesser number of completed calendar quarters preceding the applicable period, if applicable). During the year ended December 31, 2020, 0 incentive compensation fees were incurred.
In addition, the Investment Advisor is eligible to receive a portion of the incentive compensation payable to CMFT Management pursuant to the Management Agreement. In the event that the incentive compensation is earned and payable with respect to any quarter, CMFT Management calculates the portion of the incentive compensation that was attributable to the Managed Assets and payable to the Investment Advisor. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, CMFT Securities reimburses the Investment Advisor for costs and expenses incurred by the Investment Advisor on its behalf.
Acquisition fees and expenses
ThePursuant to the Prior Advisory Agreement, through August 20, 2019, the Company pays CR IV Advisorspaid CMFT Management or its affiliates acquisition fees of up to 2.0% of: (1) the contract purchase price of each property or asset the Company acquires;acquired; (2) the amount paid in respect of the development, construction or improvement

F-29

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


of each asset the Company acquires;acquired; (3) the purchase price of any loan the Company acquires;acquired; and (4) the principal amount of any loan the Company originates.originated. In addition, the Company reimburses CR IV Advisorsreimbursed CMFT Management or its affiliates for acquisition-related expenses incurred in the process of acquiring properties, so long as the total acquisition fees and expenses relating to the transaction do not exceed 6.0% of the contract purchase price, unless otherwise approved by a majority of the Board, including a majority of the Company’s independent directors, as commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to the Company. Other transaction-related expenses, such as advisor reimbursements for disposition activities, are expensed as incurred and are included in transaction-related expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.
Advisory fees and expenses
ThePursuant to the Prior Advisory Agreement, through August 20, 2019, the Company pays CR IV Advisorspaid CMFT Management a monthly advisory fee based upon the Company’s monthly average invested assets, which, effective January 1, 2017, is2019, was based on the estimated market value of such assets used to determine the Company’s estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2016, as discussed in Note 1 — Organization and Business,2018, and for those assets acquired subsequent to December 31, 2016, is2018, was based on the purchase price. The monthly advisory fee iswas equal to the following amounts: (1) an annualized rate of 0.75% paid on the Company’s average invested assets that are between $0$0 and $2.0 billion;$2.0 billion; (2) an annualized rate of 0.70% paid on the Company’s average invested assets that are between $2.0$2.0 billion and $4.0 billion;$4.0 billion; and (3) an annualized rate of 0.65% paid on the Company’s average invested assets that are over $4.0 billion.$4.0 billion.
Operating expenses
The Company reimburses CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates for certain expenses CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates paid or incurred in connection with the services provided to the Company,Company. Through August 20, 2019, such reimbursements were subject to the limitation that the Company willwould not reimburse CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates for any amount by which the operating expenses (including the advisory fee) at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceedexceeded the greater of: (1) 2.0% of average invested assets, or (2) 25.0% of net income excluding any additions to reserves for depreciation bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of assets for that period. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, beginning on August 20, 2019, such limits are no longer applicable. The Company will not reimburse CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates for the salaries and benefits paid to personnel in connection with thewho provide services for which CR IV Advisors receives acquisition fees, andto the Company will not reimburse CR IV Advisors for salaries and benefits paid toincluding the Company’s executive officers.officers and any portfolio management, acquisitions or investment professionals.
Disposition fees
If CR IV AdvisorsPursuant to the Prior Advisory Agreement, through August 20, 2019, if CMFT Management or its affiliates provideprovided a substantial amount of services (as determined by a majority of the Company’s independent directors) in connection with the sale of one or more properties (or the Company’s entire portfolio), the Company will pay CR IV Advisorspaid CMFT Management or its affiliates a disposition fee in an amount equal to up to one-half of the real estate or brokerage commission paid by the Company to third parties on the sale of such property, not to exceed 1.0% of the contract price of the property sold; provided, however, in no
F-38

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

event maywould the total disposition fees paid to CR IV Advisors,CMFT Management, its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties exceed the lesser of the customary competitive real estate commission or an amount equal to 6.0% of the contract sales price. During eachFor the Company’s properties under contract to be sold or specifically identified in a broker agreement as being marketed for sale as of August 20, 2019, CMFT Management may be entitled to receive a disposition fee in accordance with the terms of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, no disposition fees were incurred for any such services provided by CR IV Advisors or its affiliates.Prior Advisory Agreement.
Subordinated performance fees
IfPursuant to the Prior Advisory Agreement, through August 20, 2019, if the Company iswas sold or its assets arewere liquidated, CR IV Advisors will beCMFT Management was entitled to receive a subordinated performance fee equal to 15.0% of the net sale proceeds remaining after stockholders have received, from regular distributions plus special distributions paid from proceeds of such sale, a return of their net capital invested and an 8.0% annual cumulative, non-compounded return. Alternatively through August 20, 2019, if the Company’s shares arewere listed on a national securities exchange, CR IV Advisors will beCMFT Management was entitled to a subordinated performance fee equal to 15.0% of the amount by which the market value of the Company’s outstanding stock plus all distributions paid by the Company prior to listing, exceedsexceeded the sum of the total amount of capital raised from stockholders and the amount of distributions necessary to generate an 8.0% annual cumulative, non-compounded return to stockholders. As an additional alternative, upon termination of the advisory agreement, CR IV Advisors may bePrior Advisory Agreement, CMFT Management was entitled to a subordinated performance fee similar to the fee to which CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management would have been entitled had the portfolio been liquidated (based on an independent appraised value of the portfolio) on the date of termination. During each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015, no2018, 0 subordinated performance fees were incurred related to any such events.

F-30

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The Company recorded fees and expense reimbursements as shown in the table below for services provided by CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates related to the services described above during the periods indicated (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Management fees and expenses$44,744 $16,350 (1)$
Acquisition fees and expenses$550 $2,110 $2,749 
Disposition fees$434 $3,967 $478 
Advisory fees and expenses$$25,989 $43,399 
Operating expenses$3,651 (2)$3,594 $5,163 

(1)     Includes manager reimbursements incurred subject to the Management Agreement.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Acquisition fees and expenses$6,532
 $4,960
 $13,311
Advisory fees and expenses$44,072
 $41,926
 $36,225
Operating expenses$4,494
 $4,119
 $4,568
      
(2)     Includes $308,000 of merger-related expenses incurred subject to the Merger Agreements and the terminated CCIT II Merger Agreement, net of $260,000 which was reimbursed by CCIT II.
Of the amounts shown above, $2.0$14.7 million and $5.3$14.5 million had been incurred, but not yet paid, for services provided by CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates in connection with the acquisitionmanagement and operationsoperating activities during the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, and such amounts were recorded as liabilities of the Company as of such dates.
Due to/fromto Affiliates
As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, $2.02019, $14.7 million and $5.3$14.5 million, respectively, had been incurred primarily for advisory and operating expenses by CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates, but had not yet been reimbursed by the Company. These amounts were included in due to affiliates in the consolidated balance sheets for such periods.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $56,000 and $58,000, respectively, were due from CR IV Advisors or its affiliates related to amounts received by affiliates of the advisor which were due to the Company.
NOTE 1213 — ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY
Under various agreements, the Company has engaged and may in the future engage CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates to provide certain services that are essential to the Company, including asset management services, supervision of the management and leasing of properties owned by the Company, asset acquisition and disposition decisions, as well as other administrative responsibilities for the Company including accounting services and stockholder relations. As a result of these relationships, the Company is dependent upon CR IV AdvisorsCMFT Management or its affiliates. In the event that these companies are unable to provide the Company with these services, the Company would be required to find alternative providers of these services.
F-39

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

NOTE 1314 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
As of December 31, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, the Company was authorized to issue $600.0 million of shares of common stock under the Secondary DRIP Offering. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company was authorized to issue $247.0 million in shares of common stock pursuant to the Initial DRIP Offering. All shares of such stock have a par value of $0.01 per share. The par value of stockholder proceeds raised from the DRIP Offerings is classified as common stock, with the remainder allocated to capital in excess of par value. The Company ceased issuing shares under the Initial DRIP Offering effective as of June 30, 2016.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company was authorized to issue 490.0 million shares of common stock and 10.0 million shares of preferred stock. All shares of such stock have a par value of $0.01 per share. On August 11, 2010, the Company sold 20,000 shares of common stock, at $10.00 per share, to Cole Holdings Corporation (“CHC”). On April 5, 2013, the ownership of such shares was transferred to CREInvestments, LLC, (“CREI”), an affiliate of CR IV Advisors.CMFT Management. On February 7, 2014, the ownership of such shares was transferred to VEREIT OP. Upon completionOperating Partnership, L.P. (“VEREIT OP”), a former affiliated entity of the Transaction onCompany’s sponsor. On February 1, 2018, the ownership of such shares was transferred by VEREIT OP to CR IV Advisors. Pursuant toCMFT Management.
On December 21, 2020, in connection with the Company’s charter, CR IV Advisors is prohibited from selling the 20,000 sharesconsummation of the common stock that represents the initial investment inMergers, the Company for so long as CCO Group remains the Company’s sponsor; provided, however, that CR IV Advisors may transfer ownership of all or a portion of these 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to other affiliates of the Company’s sponsor. The Company ceased offering shares of its common stock in the Offering on April 4, 2014 and registered $247.0issued 52.6 million in shares of common stock under the Initial DRIP Offering.for consideration of $7.31 per share.
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
Pursuant to the Amended DRIP, the Company allows stockholders to elect to have their distributions reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock. The purchase price understock at the DRIP portion of the Offering was $9.50 per share. The purchase price under the Initial DRIP Offering was $9.50 per share until September 30, 2015 and was $9.70 per share beginning October 1, 2015, themost recent estimated per share NAV as determined by the Board as of August 31, 2015. Prior to November 13, 2016, the purchase price per share under the Secondary DRIP Offering was $9.70 and from November 14, 2016 to March 27, 2017 was

F-31

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


$9.92 per share, the estimated per share NAV as determined by the Board as of September 30, 2016. From March 28, 2017 to March 28, 2018 the purchase price per share under the Secondary DRIP Offering was $10.08 per share, the estimated per share NAV as determined by the Board as of December 31, 2016. On March 29, 2018, the Board established an updated estimated per share NAV of its common stock as of December 31, 2017 of $9.37 per share. Therefore, effective March 29, 2018, the Company will issue shares of its common stock at a price of $9.37 per share pursuant to the Secondary DRIP Offering.Board. The Board may terminate or amend the Secondary DRIP Offering at the Company’s discretion at any time upon ten days’ prior written notice to the stockholders. In connection with the Mergers, on August 30, 2020, the Board approved the suspension of the Amended DRIP, and, therefore, distributions paid after that date were paid in cash to all stockholders until the Amended DRIP was reinstated, effective April 1, 2021, by the Board on March 25, 2021. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, approximately 10.14.2 million, 11.29.3 million and 11.79.6 million shares were purchased under the DRIP Offerings for approximately $101.3$34.2 million,, $109.2 $82.4 million and $112.2$91.8 million, respectively, which were recorded as redeemable common stock on the consolidated balance sheets.sheets prior to the suspension of the Amended Share Redemption Program.
Share Redemption Program
The Company’s share redemption programAmended Share Redemption Program permits its stockholders to sell their shares back to the Company after they have held them for at least one year, subject to the significant conditions and limitations described below.
The share redemption programAmended Share Redemption Program provides that the Company will redeem shares of its common stock from requesting stockholders, subject to the terms and conditions of the share redemption program.Amended Share Redemption Program. The Company will limit the number of shares redeemed pursuant to the share redemption programAmended Share Redemption Program as follows: (1) the Company will not redeem in excess of 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12 months prior to the end of the fiscal quarter for which the redemptions are being paid; and (2) funding for the redemption of shares will be limited, among other things, to the net proceeds the Company receives from the sale of shares under the DRIP Offerings, net of shares redeemed to date. In an effort to accommodate redemption requests throughout the calendar year, the Company intends to limit quarterly redemptions to approximately 1.25% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the trailing 12-month period ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter, and funding for redemptions for each quarter generally will be limited to the net proceeds the Company receives from the sale of shares in the respective quarter under the DRIP Offerings. 
In accordance withExcept for redemptions due to a stockholder’s death, bankruptcy or other exigent circumstances, the Company’sredemption price per share redemption program,will equal the per share value shown on the stockholder’s most recent customer account statement. The redemption price (other thanwill be adjusted for shares purchased pursuant to the DRIP portion of the Offeringany stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the DRIP Offerings) will depend on the length of time the redeeming stockholder has held such shares as follows: after two years from the purchase date, 97.5% of the most recent estimated value of each share; and after three years from the purchase date, 100% of the most recent estimated value of each share. During this time period, the redemption price for shares purchased pursuantlike with respect to the DRIP portion of the Offering and the DRIP Offerings will be 100% of the most recent estimated value of each share. Until September 30, 2015, the most recent estimated value per share for purposes of the share redemption program was $10.00 per share, the purchase price per share in the primary portion of the Offering. From October 1, 2015 until November 13, 2016, the most recent estimated value per share for purposes of the share redemption program was $9.70 per share, the estimated per share NAV as of August 31, 2015, as determined by the Board. From November 14, 2016 until March 27, 2017, the most recent estimated value per share for purposes of the share redemption program was $9.92 per share, the estimated per share NAV as of September 30, 2016, as determined by the Board. From March 28, 2017 to March 28, 2018, the most recent estimated value per share for purposes of the share redemption program was $10.08 per share, the estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2016, as determined by the Board. As a result of the Board’s determination of an updated estimated value of the Company’s shares of common stock, the updated estimated per share NAV of $9.37, as of December 31, 2017, will serve as the most recent estimated value for purposes of the share redemption program, effective March 29, 2018, until such time as the Board determines a new estimated per share NAV. See the discussion of the updated estimated per share NAV of the Company’s common stock effective March 29, 2018if any such event is not already reflected in Note 17 — Subsequent Events.the per share value shown on the stockholder’s most recent customer account statement.
Upon receipt of a request for redemption, the Company may conduct a Uniform Commercial Code search to ensure that no liens are held against the shares. If the Company cannot purchase all shares presented for redemption in any fiscal quarter, based upon insufficient cash available and/or the limit on the number of shares the Company may redeem during any quarter or year, the Company will give priority to the redemption of deceased stockholders’ shares. The Company next will give priority to requests for full redemption of accounts with a balance of 250 shares or less at the time the Company receives the request, in order to reduce the expense of maintaining small accounts. Thereafter, the Company will honor the remaining quarterly redemption requests on a pro rata basis. Following such quarterly redemption period, the unsatisfied portion of the prior redemption request must be resubmitted, prior to the last day of the new quarter. Unfulfilled requests for redemption will not be carried over automatically to subsequent redemption periods.
F-40

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The Company redeems shares no later than the end of the month following the end of each fiscal quarter. Requests for redemption must be received on or prior to the end of the fiscal quarter in order for the Company to repurchase the shares in the month following the end of that fiscal quarter. The Board may amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption programAmended Share Redemption Program at any time upon 30 days’ prior written notice to the stockholders. In connection with the Mergers, the Board approved the suspension of the Company’s Amended Share Redemption Program on August 30, 2020, and, therefore, no shares were redeemed from the Company’s stockholders after that date until the Amended Share Redemption Program was reinstated, effective April 1, 2021, by the Board on March 25, 2021. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, the Company redeemed approximately 6.0 million, 9.5 million and 9.8 million shares, respectively, under the share redemption program then in effect for $48.1 million, $84.1 million and $93.8 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2020, redemption requests relating to approximately 44.5 million shares went unfulfilled.

Distributions Payable and Distribution Policy
Prior to April 1, 2020, on a quarterly basis, the Board authorized a daily distribution for the succeeding quarter. The Board authorized the following daily distribution amounts per share for the periods indicated below:
Period CommencingPeriod EndingDaily Distribution Amount
April 14, 2012December 31, 2012$0.001707848
January 1, 2013December 31, 2015$0.001712523
January 1, 2016December 31, 2016$0.001706776
January 1, 2017December 31, 2019$0.001711452
January 1, 2020March 31, 2020$0.001706776
On April 20, 2020, the Board decided to make a determination as to the amount and timing of distributions on a monthly, instead of a quarterly, basis until such time that the Company has greater visibility into the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on tenants’ ability to continue to pay rent on their leases on a timely basis or at all, the degree to which federal, state or local governmental authorities grant rent relief or other relief or amnesty programs applicable to the Company’s tenants, the Company’s ability to access the capital markets, and on the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. On March 25, 2021, the Board resumed declaring distributions on a quarterly basis by declaring a monthly per share distribution for the months of March, April, May and June 2021. Since April 1, 2020, the Board authorized the following monthly distribution amounts per share for the periods indicated below:
Record DateDistribution Amount
April 30, 2020$0.0130
May 31, 2020$0.0130
June 30, 2020$0.0161
July 30, 2020$0.0304
August 28, 2020$0.0303
September 29, 2020$0.0303
October 29, 2020$0.0303
November 27, 2020$0.0303
December 30, 2020$0.0303
January 28, 2021$0.0303
February 25, 2021$0.0303
March 29, 2021$0.0303
April 29 2021$0.0303
May 28, 2021$0.0303
June 29, 2021$0.0303
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had distributions payable of $11.0 million.
F-32
F-41

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



Equity-Based Compensation
Company redeemedOn August 10, 2018, the Board approved the adoption of the Company’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), under which 400,000 of the Company’s shares of common stock were reserved for issuance and awards of approximately 10.3 million, 11.5 million and 4.6 million345,000 shares respectively, under the share redemption programof common stock are available for $103.7 million, $110.7 million and $44.2 million, respectively. During the year endedfuture grant at December 31, 2017, redemption requests relating2020. Under the Plan, the Board or a committee designated by the Board has the authority to approximately 34.2 million shares went unfulfilled.
Distributions Payable and Distribution Policy
grant restricted stock awards or deferred stock awards to non-employee directors of the Company, which will further align such directors’ interests with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. The Board authorized a daily distribution, basedor committee also has the authority to determine the terms of any award granted pursuant to the Plan, including vesting schedules, restrictions and acceleration of any restrictions. The Plan may be amended or terminated by the Board at any time. The Plan expires on 365 days in the calendar year, of $0.001711452 per share for stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing on January 1, 2017 and ending on June 30, 2018. August 9, 2028.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company has granted awards of approximately 11,000 restricted shares to each of the independent members of the Board (approximately 54,500 restricted shares in aggregate) under the Plan. As of December 31, 2020, 32,500 of the restricted shares had distributions payablevested based on one year of $16.5 million.continuous service. The remaining 22,000 restricted shares issued had not vested or been forfeited as of December 31, 2020. The fair value of the Company’s share awards is determined using the Company’s per share NAV on the date of grant. Compensation expense related to the restricted shares is recognized over the vesting period. The Company recorded compensation expense of $160,000 and $138,000 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, related to the restricted shares which is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2020, there was $121,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to these restricted shares, which will be recognized ratably over the remaining period of service prior to October 2021.
NOTE 1415 — INCOME TAXES
For federal income tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are characterized as ordinary dividends, capital gain distributions, or nondividend distributions. Nondividend distributions will reduce U.S stockholders’ basis (but not below zero) in their shares.
The following table shows the character of the distributions the Company paid on a percentage basis for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
 Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
Character of Distributions: 2017 2016 2015Character of Distributions:202020192018
Ordinary dividends 51% 53% 58%Ordinary dividends%39 %52 %
Nondividend distributions 42% 46% 42%Nondividend distributions100 %%48 %
Capital gain distributions 7% 1% %Capital gain distributions%54 %%
Total 100% 100% 100%Total100 %100 %100 %
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015, the Company distributed as dividends to its stockholders 100% of its taxable income for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes related to such taxable income was recorded on the Company’s financial statements. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,2018, the Company incurred state and local income and franchise taxes of $1.6 million, $1.2$568,000, $1.5 million, and $2.2$1.4 million, respectively, which were recorded in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company had no0 unrecognized tax benefits as of or during the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019. Any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized within the provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well as various state jurisdictions, and is subject to routine examinations by the respective tax authorities.
In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law which, in addition to reducing corporate and individual tax rates, eliminates or restricts various deductions. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act makes numerous large and small changes to the tax rules that do not affect the Company’s REIT qualification rules directly.
NOTE 1516OPERATING LEASES
The Company’s real estate assets are leased to tenants under operating leases for which the terms, expirations and expirationsextension options vary. The Company’s operating leases do not convey to the lessee the right to purchase the underlying asset upon expiration of the lease period. To determine whether a contract contains a lease, the Company reviews contracts to determine if the agreement conveys the right to control the use of an asset. The Company accounts for lease and non-lease components as a single, combined operating lease component. Non-lease components primarily consist of maintenance services, including CAM, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities paid for by the lessor but consumed by the lessee. Non-lease components are considered to be variable rental and other property income and are recognized in the period incurred.
F-42

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company’s leases had a weighted-average remaining term of 9.68.8 years. Certain leases include provisions to extend the lease agreements, options for early termination after paying a specified penalty, rights of first refusal to purchase the property at competitive market rates, and other negotiated terms and conditions. The Company retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to tenants. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

F-33

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


As of December 31, 2017,2020, the future minimum rental income from the Company’s real estate assets under non-cancelable operating leases, assuming no exercise of renewal options for the succeeding five fiscal years and thereafter, was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31, Future Minimum Rental IncomeYear Ending December 31,Future Minimum Rental Income
2018$361,650
2019348,449
2020335,926
20212021319,531
2021$255,071 
20222022303,429
2022249,576 
20232023232,486 
20242024212,373 
20252025192,954 
ThereafterThereafter1,962,178
Thereafter1,242,601 
TotalTotal$3,631,163
Total$2,385,061 
A certain amount of the Company’s rental and other property income is from tenants with leases which are subject to contingent rent provisions. These contingent rents are subject to the tenant achieving periodic revenues in excess of specified levels. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, the amount of the contingent rent earned by the Company was not significant.
Rental and other property income during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
 202020192018
Fixed rental and other property income (1)
$221,445 $342,453 $368,847 
Variable rental and other property income (2)
40,085 50,771 60,789 
Total rental and other property income$261,530 $393,224 $429,636 

(1)Consists primarily of fixed contractual payments from operating leases with tenants recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including amortization of acquired above- and below-market leases, and is net of uncollectible lease-related receivables.
(2)Consists primarily of tenant reimbursements for recoverable real estate taxes and property operating expenses, and percentage rent.
The Company has 1 property subject to a non-cancelable operating ground lease with a remaining term of 12.7 years, with a lease liability (in deferred rental income and other liabilities) and a related ROU asset (in prepaid expenses, derivative assets and other assets) of $2.7 million in the consolidated balance sheets. The lease liability and ROU asset were initially measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments using a discount rate of 4.3%. This reflects the Company’s incremental borrowing rate, which was calculated based on the interest rate the Company would incur to borrow on a fully collateralized basis over a term similar to the lease.
The Company recognized $250,000 of ground lease expense during the year ended December 31, 2020, of which $242,000 was paid in cash during the period it was recognized. As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s scheduled future minimum rental payments related to its operating ground lease is approximately $250,000 annually for 2021 through 2025, and $1.9 million thereafter through the maturity date of the lease in August 2033.
NOTE 1617 — SEGMENT REPORTING
As of December 31, 2020, the Company determined that it has 2 reportable segments: real estate and credit. Corporate/other represents all corporate level and unallocated items and includes the Company’s other asset management activities and operating expenses. There were no changes in the structure of the Company’s internal organization that prompted the change in reportable segments. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current year presentation shown below.
F-43

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The following tables present segment reporting for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Real EstateCreditCorporate/OtherCompany Total
Rental and other property income$261,530 $$$261,530 
Interest income29,393 29,393 
Total revenues261,530 29,393 290,923 
General and administrative291 2,080 13,014 15,385 
Property operating23,399 23,399 
Real estate tax27,691 27,691 
Management and advisory fees and expenses32,164 7,861 4,718 44,743 
Transaction-related346 550 905 
Depreciation and amortization80,973 80,973 
Impairment16,737 16,737 
Provision for credit losses68,356 68,356 
Total operating expenses181,601 78,306 18,282 278,189 
Gain on disposition of real estate, net27,518 27,518 
Merger-related expenses(2,193)(2,193)
Merger termination fee income7,380 7,380 
Operating income (loss)107,447 (48,913)(13,095)45,439 
Other expense:
Interest expense and other, net(21,380)(5,101)(37,635)(64,116)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(4,394)(447)(4,841)
Segment net income (loss)$81,673 $(54,014)$(51,177)$(23,518)
Total assets as of December 31, 2020$3,405,590 $949,764 $104,255 $4,459,609 
F-44

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Year Ended December 31, 2019
Real EstateCreditCorporate/OtherCompany Total
Rental and other property income$393,224 $$$393,224 
Interest income20,132 20,132 
Total revenues393,224 20,132 413,356 
General and administrative428 10 13,291 13,729 
Property operating33,462 33,462 
Real estate tax32,196 32,196 
Management and advisory fees and expenses35,557 1,688 5,094 42,339 
Transaction-related288 1,242 748 2,278 
Depreciation and amortization107,867 107,867 
Impairment72,939 72,939 
Total operating expenses282,737 2,940 19,133 304,810 
Gain on disposition of real estate, net180,666 180,666 
Operating income (loss)291,153 17,192 (19,133)289,212 
Other expense:
Interest expense and other, net(45,606)(19)(53,340)(98,965)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(6,482)(745)(7,227)
Segment net income (loss)239,065 17,173 (73,218)183,020 
Segment net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest121 121 
Segment net income (loss) attributable to the Company$238,944 $17,173 $(73,218)$182,899 
Total assets as of December 31, 2019$2,895,609 $551,805 $221,209 $3,668,623 
F-45

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Year Ended December 31, 2018
Real EstateCreditCorporate/OtherCompany Total
Rental and other property income$429,636 $$$429,636 
Interest income1,640 1,640 
Total revenues429,636 1,640 431,276 
General and administrative502 13,625 14,127 
Property operating30,267 30,267 
Real estate tax37,898 37,898 
Management and advisory fees and expenses38,032 53 5,314 43,399 
Transaction-related85 1,786 730 2,601 
Depreciation and amortization140,979 140,979 
Impairment32,975 32,975 
Total operating expenses280,738 1,839 19,669 302,246 
Gain on disposition of real estate, net6,299 6,299 
Operating income (loss)155,197 (199)(19,669)135,329 
Other expense:
Interest expense and other, net(49,458)(48,413)(97,871)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(46)(46)
Segment net income (loss)105,693 (199)(68,082)37,412 
Segment net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest134 134 
Segment net income (loss) attributable to the Company$105,559 $(199)$(68,082)$37,278 
Total assets as of December 31, 2018$4,502,999 $90,788 $23,584 $4,617,371 
NOTE 18 — QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
Presented below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 (in thousands, except for per share amounts). In the opinion of management, the information for the interim periods presented includes all adjustments which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary to present a fair presentation of the results for each period.
  December 31, 2017
  First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
Revenues $104,780
 $104,504
 $107,024
 $107,787
Acquisition-related expenses $1,247
 $163
 $110
 $79
Operating income $38,783
 $38,756
 $37,755
 $37,901
Net income $16,251
 $18,107
 $29,769
 $15,424
Net income attributable to the Company $16,217
 $18,075
 $29,736
 $15,392
Basic and diluted net income per common share (1)
 $0.05
 $0.06
 $0.10
 $0.05
Distributions declared per common share $0.154
 $0.157
 $0.157
 $0.157
December 31, 2020
First QuarterSecond QuarterThird QuarterFourth Quarter
Revenues$74,007 $67,296 $72,642 $76,978 
Net (loss) income$(12,175)$(3,746)$4,179 $(11,776)
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per common share (1)
$(0.04)$(0.01)$0.01 $(0.04)

(1)The Company calculates net income per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.
(1)The Company calculates net (loss) income per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.
 December 31, 2016December 31, 2019
 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth QuarterFirst QuarterSecond QuarterThird QuarterFourth Quarter
Revenues $100,547
 $100,597
 $101,796
 $104,511
Revenues$109,260 $105,529 $105,479 $93,088 
Acquisition-related expenses $372
 $1,803
 $1,417
 $599
Operating income $38,675
 $38,153
 $37,314
 $35,042
Net income $20,054
 $18,945
 $18,128
 $14,852
Net income$8,851 $9,006 $2,573 $162,590 
Net income attributable to the Company $20,020
 $18,912
 $18,096
 $14,814
Net income attributable to the Company$8,817 $8,973 $2,541 $162,568 
Basic and diluted net income per common share (1)
 $0.06
 $0.06
 $0.06
 $0.05
Basic and diluted net income per common share (1)
$0.03 $0.03 $0.01 $0.52 
Distributions declared per common share $0.155
 $0.156
 $0.157
 $0.157

(1)The Company calculates net income per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.

F-34
F-46

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



(1)The Company calculates net income per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.
NOTE 1719 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The following events occurred subsequent to December 31, 2017:Distribution Reinvestment Plan and Share Redemption Program
On March 25, 2021, the Board reinstated the Amended DRIP and Amended Share Redemption of Shares of Common StockProgram, effective April 1, 2021.
Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company redeemed approximately 2.4 million shares pursuant to the Company’s share redemption program for $24.3 million (at an average price per share of $10.08). Management, in its discretion, limited the amount of shares redeemed for the three months ended December 31, 2017 to an amount equal to net proceeds the Company received from the sale of shares in the DRIP Offerings during the respective period. The remaining redemption requests received during the three months ended December 31, 2017 totaling approximately 11.1 million shares went unfulfilled.
Property Disposition
Subsequent to December 31, 2017,2020, the Company disposed of one commercial real estate1 property for aan aggregate gross sales price of $2.0$3.7 million, resulting in net proceeds of $2.0$3.5 million after closing costs and a gain of $265,000. No disposition fees were paid to CR IV Advisors or its affiliates in connection with the sale of the property and thecosts. The Company has no continuing involvement with this property.
SaleForeclosure of Cole CapitalMezzanine Loans
As describedOn January 7, 2021, the Company completed foreclosure proceedings to take control of the assets securing its mezzanine loans, which are comprised of 75 condominium units and 21 rental units across 4 buildings totaling approximately 164,000 square feet.
Broadly Syndicated Loans
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company settled $37.4 million of net broadly syndicated loan transactions that were traded subsequent to December 31, 2020.
Repurchase Facilities
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company received borrowings under the Repurchase Facilities in an aggregate amount of $122.3 million. Advances under the Repurchase Agreements accrue interest at per annum rates based on the one-month LIBOR, plus a spread to be determined on a case-by-case basis between Citibank or Barclays and the CMFT Lending Subs, as discussed in Note 19OrganizationCredit Facilities, Notes Payable and Business, on February 1, 2018, the Transaction was completed. Immediately following the completion of the Transaction, Cole Capital Advisors, Inc. and the Company’s dealer manager were each converted into Delaware limited liability companies, Cole Capital Advisors, Inc.’s name was changedRepurchase Facilities.
CMBS Purchase
Subsequent to CCO Group, LLC, and the Company’s dealer manager’s name was changed to CCO Capital, LLC. As a result of the Transaction, CIM owns and/or controls CCO Group, LLC and its subsidiaries, and CCO Group, LLC owns and controls CR IV Advisors, CCO Capital and CREI Advisors, the Company’s external advisor, dealer manager for the Offerings and property manager, respectively.
In addition, as part of the Transaction, VEREIT OP and CCO Group, LLC entered into the Services Agreement pursuant to which VEREIT OP will continue to provide certain services to CCO Group and to the Cole REITs, including operational real estate support. VEREIT OP will continue to provide such services through March 31, 2019 (or, if later, the date of the last government filing other than a tax filing made by any of the Cole REITs with respect to its 2018 fiscal year) and will provide consulting and research services through December 31, 2023 as requested by CCO Group, LLC.
Estimated Per Share NAV
On March 29, 2018,2020, the Board established an estimated per share NAV of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2017, of $9.37 per share. Commencing on March 29, 2018, distributions will be reinvestedCompany invested $28.5 million in shares of the Company’s common stock under the Secondary DRIP Offering at a price of $9.37 per share. Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s share redemption program, commencing on March 29, 2018, the updated estimated per share NAV of $9.37, as of December 31, 2017, will serve as the most recent estimated value for purposes of the share redemption program going forward, until such time as the Board determines a new estimated per share NAV.

CMBS.
F-35
F-47

COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
10 Box Cost Plus:
Conway, AR(h)$733 $1,654 $$2,387 $170 9/5/20171989
Russellville, AR(h)990 1,470 2,460 177 3/20/20171989
Aaron’s Rents:
Arkadelphia, AR$— 183 491 674 12/21/20202014
Academy Sports:
Cartersville, GA— 4,517 4,574 9,091 12/21/20202014
Cookeville, TN(h)23,847 73,371 97,218 11,933 9/30/20142015
Greenville, NC(h)1,968 7,054 9,022 847 1/12/20172016
McDonough, GA(h)1,846 5,626 7,472 1,047 4/24/20142010
Valdosta, GA5,838 2,482 5,922 8,404 1,343 5/10/20132012
Actuant Campus:
Columbus, WI— 2,090 14,633 16,723 19 12/21/20202014
Advance Auto Parts:
Fairmont, NC— 253 868 1,121 12/21/20202004
Hampton,VA— 645 655 1,300 12/21/20202015
Mattoon, IL(h)261 1,063 1,324 134 12/4/20152015
Stratford,CT— 755 1,736 2,491 12/21/20201994
Willmar, MN(h)200 1,279 1,479 187 3/25/20152014
Albany Square:
Albany, GA4,600 1,606 7,113 373 9,092 1,610 2/26/20142013
Almeda Crossing:
Houston, TX(h)4,738 26,245 (8,732)22,251 415 8/7/20142006
Aspen Dental:
Rogers,AR— 289 1,611 1,900 12/21/20202015
At Home:
Pearland, TX— 3,663 10,305 13,968 14 12/21/20201994
AutoZone:
Sheffield, OH(h)815 770 1,585 125 10/15/20142014
Bass Pro Shop:
Portage, IN— 1,428 8,414 9,842 14 12/21/20201983
Tallahassee, FL(h)945 5,713 6,658 1,190 8/20/20132013
Beavercreek Shopping Center:
Beavercreek, OH(h)5,504 25,178 554 31,236 5,130 10/31/20132013
Becton, Dickinson and Company:
Broken Bow, NE(h)244 1,733 1,977 333 6/19/20142007
Bed Bath & Beyond/Golf Smith:
Schaumburg, IL7,300 4,786 6,149 (1,065)9,870 458 3/8/20131997
BJ's Wholesale Club:
Fort Myers, FL— 5,331 21,692 27,023 25 12/21/20202018
Roanoke, VA— 4,509 14,545 19,054 49 11/25/20202018
Blankenbaker Plaza:
Louisville, KY— 4,861 10,497 15,358 16 12/21/20202007
Bob Evans:
Akron, OH(h)447 1,537 1,984 176 4/28/20172007
Anderson, IN(h)912 1,455 2,367 170 4/28/20171984
Austintown, OH(h)305 1,426 1,731 176 4/28/20171995
Birch Run, MI(h)733 1,192 1,925 143 4/28/20172008
Blue Ash, OH(h)628 1,429 2,057 190 4/28/20171994
Chardon, OH(h)333 682 1,015 89 4/28/20172003
Chillicothe, OH(h)557 1,524 2,081 182 4/28/20171998
Columbus, OH(h)523 1,376 1,899 170 4/28/20172003
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company Has Invested in Under Operating Leases:      
10Box Cost-Plus:                
 Conway, AR $
 $733
 $1,654
 $
 $2,387
 $15
 9/5/2017 1989
 Russellville, AR 
 990
 1,470
 
 2,460
 37
 3/20/2017 1989
24 Hour Fitness:                
 Beaverton, OR (g)
 2,609
 9,974
 
 12,583
 821
 9/30/2014 2009
 Fort Worth, TX (g)
 1,519
 7,449
 
 8,968
 844
 9/27/2013 2008
Aaron’s:                
 Hillsboro, OH (g)
 279
 829
 
 1,108
 118
 8/26/2013 2013
 Mountain Home, AR (g)
 183
 872
 
 1,055
 50
 10/1/2015 2015
 Wilmington, OH (g)
 249
 1,134
 
 1,383
 98
 2/26/2015 2014
Academy Sports:                
 Clarksville, TN (g)
 1,811
 6,603
 
 8,414
 635
 6/17/2014 2014
 Cookeville, TN 49,300
 
 23,847
 73,371
 97,218
 4,945
 9/30/2014 2015
 Douglasville, GA (g)
 1,360
 8,593
 
 9,953
 815
 6/12/2014 2014
 Flowood, MS (g)
 1,534
 7,864
 
 9,398
 800
 6/27/2014 2014
 Greenville, NC 
 1,968
 7,054
 
 9,022
 205
 1/12/2017 2016
 McDonough, GA (g)
 1,846
 5,626
 
 7,472
 579
 4/24/2014 2010
 Valdosta, GA 5,838
 2,482
 5,922
 
 8,404
 815
 5/10/2013 2012
Advance Auto:                
 Corydon, IN (g)
 190
 1,219
 
 1,409
 173
 10/26/2012 2012
 Dearborn Heights, MI (g)
 385
 1,090
 
 1,475
 119
 8/30/2013 2013
 Decatur, GA (g)
 606
 1,053
 
 1,659
 118
 12/20/2013 2012
 Lake Geneva, WI 1,062
 381
 1,181
 
 1,562
 150
 2/6/2013 2012
 Lawton, OK (g)
 387
 1,000
 
 1,387
 70
 6/12/2015 2005
 Mattoon, IL (g)
 261
 1,063
 
 1,324
 54
 12/4/2015 2015
 Mt. Pleasant, IA (g)
 122
 1,069
 
 1,191
 120
 4/26/2014 2013
 North Ridgeville, OH (g)
 218
 1,284
 
 1,502
 186
 4/13/2012 2008
 Rutherfordton, NC (g)
 220
 944
 
 1,164
 106
 10/22/2013 2013
 Starkville, MS (g)
 447
 756
 
 1,203
 119
 6/29/2012 2011
 Willmar, MN (g)
 200
 1,279
 
 1,479
 90
 3/25/2015 2014
Albany Square:                
 Albany, GA 4,600
 1,606
 7,113
 373
 9,092
 925
 2/26/2014 2013
Almeda Crossing:                
 Houston, TX (g)
 4,738
 26,245
 325
 31,308
 2,433
 8/7/2014 2006
Applebee’s:                
 Greenville, SC (g)
 672
 1,737
 (1,405) 1,004
 4
 6/27/2014 2004
 Lithonia, GA (g)
 1,234
 2,613
 
 3,847
 248
 3/28/2014 2002
 Savannah, GA (g)
 818
 1,686
 
 2,504
 160
 5/22/2014 2006
At Home:                
 Kissimmee, FL (g)
 2,512
 5,594
 
 8,106
 242
 9/9/2016 1992
AutoZone:                
 Philipsburg, PA (g)
 152
 1,304
 
 1,456
 190
 7/30/2012 2010
 Poughkeepsie, NY (g)
 699
 1,356
 
 2,055
 87
 8/20/2015 2005
 Sheffield, OH 
 815
 
 770
 1,585
 48
 10/15/2014 2014
Bass Pro Shops:                
 Tallahassee, FL (g)
 945
 5,713
 
 6,658
 706
 8/20/2013 2013
Beavercreek Shopping Center:                
 Beavercreek, OH 17,200
 5,504
 25,178
 537
 31,219
 2,988
 10/31/2013 2013

S-1

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Bob Evans (continued):
Dayton, OH(h)$325 $1,438 $$1,763 $182 4/28/20171998
Florence, KY(h)496 1,876 2,372 232 4/28/20171991
Gallipolis, OH$— 529 2,963 3,492 12/21/20202003
Hagerstown, MD— 490 2,789 3,279 12/21/20201989
Holland, MI(h)314 1,367 1,681 168 4/28/20172004
Huntersville, NC(h)751 657 1,408 78 4/28/20172008
Hurricane, WV(h)297 1,654 1,951 185 4/28/20171993
Mansfield, OH— 495 2,423 2,918 12/21/20202004
Milford, OH(h)271 1,498 1,769 186 4/28/20171987
Monroe, MI— 623 2,177 2,800 12/21/20201998
Monroeville, PA(h)1,340 848 2,188 96 4/28/20171995
Nicholasville, KY(h)731 693 1,424 80 4/28/20171989
North Canton, OH(h)859 1,393 2,252 172 4/28/20172006
Northwood, OH— 514 2,760 3,274 12/21/20201998
Peoria, IL— 620 524 1,144 12/21/20201995
Piqua, OH— 413 2,187 2,600 12/21/20201989
Ripley, WV(h)269 1,304 1,573 156 4/28/20171988
Tipp City, OH(h)554 1,120 1,674 142 4/28/20171989
Warsaw, IN(h)684 1,222 1,906 145 4/28/20171993
Boston Commons:
Springfield, MA(h)3,101 7,042 280 10,423 1,292 8/19/20142004
Bottom Dollar Grocery:
Ambridge, PA— 519 2,985 3,504 548 11/5/20132012
Brynwood Square:
Rockford, IL— 1,747 11,393 13,140 25 12/21/20201999
Burger King:
Yukon, OK— 500 1,141 1,641 12/21/20201989
Burlington Coat Factory:
Bangor, ME— 1,820 2,549 4,369 12/21/20202014
Cabela's:
Acworth, GA(h)4,979 18,775 23,754 1,694 9/25/20172014
Avon, OH(h)2,755 10,751 13,506 986 9/25/20172016
La Vista, NE(h)3,260 16,923 20,183 1,468 9/25/20172006
Sun Prairie, WI(h)3,373 14,058 17,431 1,338 9/25/20172015
Caliber Collision Center:
Fredericksburg, VA(h)1,807 2,292 4,099 32 7/22/20202019
Frisco, TX(h)1,484 2,038 3,522 369 9/16/20142014
Lake Jackson,TX— 800 2,974 3,774 12/21/20202006
Las Cruces, NM(h)673 1,949 2,622 334 3/21/20142014
Richmond, VA(h)1,453 3,323 4,776 48 7/30/20202020
San Antonio,TX— 691 4,458 5,149 12/21/20202019
San Antonio, TX(h)622 832 1,454 139 6/4/20142014
Williamsburg, VA(h)1,418 2,800 4,218 45 6/12/20202020
Wylie, TX(h)816 2,690 3,506 454 2/10/20152014
Camping World:
Fort Myers, FL— 3,226 11,832 15,058 16 12/21/20201987
Pensacola, FL(h)2,152 3,831 (1,307)4,676 109 4/29/20142014
Canton Marketplace:
Canton, GA31,801 8,310 48,667 930 57,907 12,023 3/28/20132009
Carlisle Crossing:
Carlisle, PA— 4,491 15,817 41 20,349 2,943 9/18/20142006
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Bed Bath & Beyond/Golfsmith:                
 Schaumburg, IL $7,300
 $4,786
 $6,149
 $475
 $11,410
 $1,018
 3/8/2013 1997
Benihana:                
 Golden Valley, MN (g)
 1,510
 2,934
 
 4,444
 410
 8/21/2012 1980
 Lauderdale by the Sea, FL (g)
 2,181
 2,014
 
 4,195
 288
 8/21/2012 1971
 Lombard, IL (g)
 1,390
 2,343
 
 3,733
 391
 8/21/2012 1984
 Woodlands, TX (g)
 1,151
 968
 
 2,119
 141
 8/21/2012 2001
Big Lots:                
 San Angelo, TX (g)
 1,043
 1,947
 
 2,990
 388
 12/19/2012 2012
 Waco, TX (g)
 1,069
 1,326
 56
 2,451
 287
 12/10/2012 2012
Biolife Plasma Services:                
 Bellingham, WA 
 2,397
 6,264
 
 8,661
 574
 11/21/2014 2014
 Grandville, MI 
 959
 4,791
 
 5,750
 406
 11/21/2014 2014
 Loveland, CO 
 651
 5,645
 
 6,296
 470
 11/21/2014 2014
 Bloomington, IN 
 696
 3,900
 
 4,596
 361
 6/26/2014 2014
 Fort Wayne, IN 
 660
 3,749
 
 4,409
 348
 6/26/2014 2013
 St. Cloud, MN 
 889
 3,633
 
 4,522
 370
 6/26/2014 2013
 St. George, UT 
 1,195
 5,561
 
 6,756
 415
 3/12/2015 2014
 Waterloo, IA 
 489
 3,380
 
 3,869
 349
 6/26/2014 2013
 West Fargo, ND 
 1,379
 5,052
 
 6,431
 398
 3/12/2015 2014
Bob Evans:                
 Akron, OH 
 447
 1,537
 
 1,984
 34
 4/28/2017 2007
 Anderson, IN 
 912
 1,455
 
 2,367
 33
 4/28/2017 1984
 Austintown, OH 
 305
 1,426
 
 1,731
 34
 4/28/2017 1995
 Birch Run, MI 
 733
 1,192
 
 1,925
 27
 4/28/2017 2008
 Blue Ash, OH 
 628
 1,429
 
 2,057
 36
 4/28/2017 1994
 Chardon, OH 
 333
 682
 
 1,015
 17
 4/28/2017 2003
 Chillicothe, OH 
 557
 1,524
 
 2,081
 35
 4/28/2017 1998
 Columbus, OH 
 523
 1,376
 
 1,899
 32
 4/28/2017 2003
 Dayton, OH 
 325
 1,438
 
 1,763
 35
 4/28/2017 1998
 Eldersburg, MD 
 557
 876
 
 1,433
 20
 4/28/2017 2000
 Florence, KY 
 496
 1,876
 
 2,372
 44
 4/28/2017 1991
 Holland, MI 
 314
 1,367
 
 1,681
 32
 4/28/2017 2004
 Huntersville, NC 
 751
 657
 
 1,408
 15
 4/28/2017 2008
 Hurricane, WV 
 297
 1,654
 
 1,951
 35
 4/28/2017 1993
 Milford, OH 
 271
 1,498
 
 1,769
 36
 4/28/2017 1987
 Monroeville, PA 
 1,340
 848
 
 2,188
 18
 4/28/2017 1995
 Nicholasville, KY 
 731
 693
 
 1,424
 15
 4/28/2017 1989
 North Canton, OH 
 859
 1,393
 
 2,252
 33
 4/28/2017 2006
 Ripley, WV 
 269
 1,304
 
 1,573
 30
 4/28/2017 1988
 Tipp City, OH 
 554
 1,120
 
 1,674
 27
 4/28/2017 1989
 Warsaw, IN 
 684
 1,222
 
 1,906
 28
 4/28/2017 1993
Bojangles:                
 Pelham, AL (g)
 219
 1,216
 
 1,435
 116
 6/30/2014 2010
Boston Commons:                
 Springfield, MA 5,400
 3,101
 7,042
 180
 10,323
 675
 8/19/2014 2004

S-2

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Cash & Carry:
Salt Lake City, UT$— $863 $4,149 $$5,012 $12/21/20202006
Chase:
Hanover Township, NJ(h)2,192 2,192 12/18/20132012
Costco:
Tallahassee, FL5,146 9,497 9,497 12/11/20122006
Cottonwood Commons:
Albuquerque, NM19,250 4,986 28,881 274 34,141 5,688 7/19/20132013
Coventry Crossing:
Coventry , RI6,000 3,462 5,899 (2,292)7,069 137 9/12/20132008
Crosspoint:
Hagerstown, MD(h)12,285 14,359 (971)25,673 2,937 9/30/20142000
Crossroads Annex:
Lafayette, LA(h)1,659 7,091 8,750 1,431 12/4/20132013
Crossroads Commons:
Plover, WI(h)1,000 4,515 75 5,590 1,068 12/10/20132012
CVS:
Arnold, MO(h)2,043 2,367 4,410 429 12/13/20132013
Asheville, NC(h)1,108 1,084 2,192 248 4/26/20121998
Austin, TX(h)1,076 3,475 4,551 626 12/13/20132013
Bloomington, IN(h)1,620 2,957 4,577 536 12/13/20132012
Blue Springs, MO(h)395 2,722 3,117 493 12/13/20132013
Bridgeton, MO(h)2,056 2,362 4,418 428 12/13/20132013
Charleston, SC(h)869 1,009 1,878 232 4/26/20121998
Chesapeake, VA(h)1,044 3,053 4,097 564 12/13/20132013
Chicago, IL(h)1,832 4,255 6,087 829 3/20/20132008
Cicero, IN(h)487 3,099 3,586 561 12/13/20132013
Corpus Christi, TX(h)648 2,557 3,205 566 4/19/20121998
Danville, IN(h)424 2,105 76 2,605 371 7/16/20141998
Eminence, KY(h)872 2,511 3,383 449 12/13/20132013
Goose Creek, SC(h)1,022 1,980 3,002 355 12/13/20132013
Greenwood, IN(h)912 3,549 61 4,522 671 7/11/20131999
Hanover Township, NJ(h)4,746 4,746 12/18/20132012
Hazlet, NJ(h)3,047 3,610 6,657 650 12/13/20132013
Honesdale, PA(h)1,206 3,342 4,548 620 12/13/20132013
Independence, MO(h)359 2,242 2,601 407 12/13/20132013
Indianapolis, IN(h)1,110 2,484 3,594 450 12/13/20132013
Irving, TX(h)745 3,034 3,779 640 10/5/20122000
Janesville, WI(h)736 2,545 3,281 460 12/13/20132013
Katy, TX(h)1,149 2,462 3,611 436 12/13/20132013
Lincoln, NE(h)2,534 3,014 5,548 544 12/13/20132013
London, KY(h)1,445 2,661 4,106 499 9/10/20132013
Middletown, NY(h)665 5,483 6,148 979 12/13/20132013
North Wilkesboro, NC(h)332 2,369 73 2,774 435 10/25/20131999
Poplar Bluff, MO(h)1,861 2,211 4,072 402 12/13/20132013
Riverton, NJ— 1,217 5,553 6,770 12/21/20202007
Salem, NH(h)3,456 2,351 5,807 421 11/18/20132013
San Antonio, TX(h)1,893 1,848 3,741 339 12/13/20132013
Sand Springs, OK(h)1,765 2,283 4,048 416 12/13/20132013
Santa Fe, NM(h)2,243 4,619 6,862 823 12/13/20132013
Sedalia, MO(h)466 2,318 2,784 421 12/13/20132013
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Bottom Dollar Grocery:                
 Ambridge, PA $
 $519
 $2,985
 $
 $3,504
 $317
 11/5/2013 2012
Brownsville Plaza:                
 Baldwin, PA 
 627
 2,702
 
 3,329
 304
 2/28/2014 2012
Bryan Crossing:                
 Kodak, TN 4,958
 863
 6,523
 
 7,386
 583
 9/9/2014 2008
Buffalo Wild Wings:                
 Idaho Falls, ID (g)
 712
 1,336
 
 2,048
 117
 7/29/2014 2008
 Warrenville, IL (g)
 1,208
 1,420
 
 2,628
 227
 3/28/2013 2004
 Woodridge, IL (g)
 1,139
 1,484
 
 2,623
 236
 3/28/2013 2005
Cabela’s:                
 Acworth, GA (g)
 4,979
 18,775
 
 23,754
 150
 9/25/2017 2014
 Avon, OH (g)
 2,755
 10,751
 
 13,506
 87
 9/25/2017 2016
 La Vista, NE (g)
 3,260
 16,923
 
 20,183
 153
 9/25/2017 2006
 Sun Prairie, WI (g)
 3,373
 14,058
 
 17,431
 119
 9/25/2017 2015
Caliber Collision Center:                
 Frisco, TX (g)
 1,484
 2,038
 
 3,522
 193
 9/16/2014 2014
 Las Cruces, NM (g)
 673
 1,949
 
 2,622
 187
 3/21/2014 2014
 Midwest City, OK (g)
 259
 1,165
 
 1,424
 117
 2/21/2014 2013
 Denver, CO (g)
 855
 658
 
 1,513
 60
 6/25/2014 1975
 San Antonio, TX (g)
 622
 832
 
 1,454
 75
 6/4/2014 2014
 Wylie, TX (g)
 816
 2,690
 
 3,506
 222
 2/10/2015 2014
Canton Marketplace:                
 Canton, GA 32,000
 8,310
 48,667
 930
 57,907
 7,660
 3/28/2013 2009
Carlisle Crossing:                
 Carlisle, PA 
 4,491
 15,817
 
 20,308
 1,687
 9/18/2014 2006
Canarsie Plaza:                
 Brooklyn, NY 75,000
 37,970
 71,267
 790
 110,027
 9,161
 12/5/2012 2011
Century Plaza:                
 Orlando, FL (g)
 3,094
 6,178
 797
 10,069
 856
 7/21/2014 2008
Chase:                
 Hanover Township, NJ (g)
 2,192
 
 
 2,192
 
 12/18/2013 2012
Chestnut Square:               
 Brevard, NC 3,727
 425
 5,037
 92
 5,554
 625
 6/7/2013 2008
Chili’s:                
 Forest City, NC (g)
 233
 1,936
 
 2,169
 161
 9/3/2014 2003
Coosa Town Center:                
 Gadsden, AL (g)
 3,246
 7,799
 
 11,045
 923
 12/20/2013 2004
Cost Plus World Market:                
 Kansas City, MO (g)
 1,378
 2,396
 42
 3,816
 446
 11/13/2012 2001
Costco:                
 Tallahassee, FL 5,146
 9,497
 
 
 9,497
 
 12/11/2012 2006
Cottonwood Commons:                
 Albuquerque, NM 19,250
 4,986
 28,881
 196
 34,063
 3,406
 7/19/2013 2013
Coventry Crossing:                
 Coventry, RI 6,000
 3,462
 5,899
 43
 9,404
 732
 9/12/2013 2008

S-3

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
CVS (continued):
St. John, MO(h)$1,546 $2,601 $$4,147 $471 12/13/20132013
Temple Hills, MD(h)1,817 2,989 71 4,877 552 9/30/20132001
Vineland, NJ(h)813 2,926 3,739 546 12/13/20132010
Waynesboro, VA(h)986 2,708 3,694 490 12/13/20132013
West Monroe, LA(h)1,738 2,136 3,874 389 12/13/20132013
Darien Towne Center:
Darien, IL(h)6,718 11,951 915 19,584 3,143 12/17/20131994
Decatur Commons:
Decatur, AL$7,000 2,478 9,333 860 12,671 2,066 7/10/20132004
Derby Marketplace:
Derby, KS— 3,169 6,494 9,663 12 12/21/20202015
Dick’s Petsmart Center:
Oshkosh, WI(h)1,445 6,599 (1,722)6,322 138 9/23/20162015
Dick’s Sporting Goods:
Oklahoma City, OK(h)685 10,587 11,272 2,371 12/31/20122012
Dollar General:
Akron, OH(h)112 1,099 1,211 221 11/1/20132013
Athens, WV— 270 1,364 1,634 12/21/20202015
Autaugaville, AL— 103 951 1,054 12/21/20201995
Bluefield, WV— 290 1,135 1,425 12/21/20202015
Buffalo, NY(h)122 1,099 1,221 177 12/5/20142014
Charleston, WV— 340 1,184 1,524 12/21/20202014
Charleston, WV— 370 1,135 — 1,505 12/21/20202014
Charleston, WV— 341 1,039 1,380 12/21/20202015
Collinsville, AL— 194 1,003 1,197 12/21/20202014
Columbus, OH(h)279 1,248 1,527 251 11/7/20132013
Des Moines, IA(h)166 943 1,109 188 8/9/20132012
Elmwood, IL— 173 941 1,114 12/21/20202012
Glouster, OH— 220 1,276 1,496 12/21/20202015
Houston (Gears), TX(h)255 1,393 1,648 259 10/18/20132013
Huntington, WV— 260 1,182 1,442 12/21/20202014
Huntington, WV— 240 1,276 1,516 12/21/20202014
Junction City, OH— 171 847 1,018 12/21/20202014
Kansas City, MO(h)283 1,068 1,351 207 10/18/20132013
Kansas City, MO(h)233 1,054 1,287 202 11/1/20132013
Lansing, MI(h)232 939 1,171 157 6/25/20142014
Lineville, AL— 257 1,217 1,474 12/21/20202014
Logansport, IN— 181 977 1,158 12/21/20202014
Mission, TX(h)182 858 1,040 146 9/5/20142014
Mobile, AL(h)410 1,059 1,469 219 6/17/20132013
Moundridge, KS— 415 526 941 12/21/20202014
Parchment, MI(h)168 1,162 1,330 193 6/25/20142014
Pipestone, MN— 204 1,034 1,238 12/21/20202014
Pueblo, CO(h)144 909 1,053 187 1/4/20132012
Ridgeley, WV— 211 1,157 1,368 12/21/20202014
Romulus, MI(h)274 1,171 1,445 205 3/7/20142013
Russell, KS(h)54 899 953 156 8/5/20142014
Selma, AL— 164 858 1,022 12/21/20202014
Semmes, AL— 196 952 1,148 12/21/20202014
Sissonville, WV— 261 1,088 1,349 12/21/20202015
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Crosspoint:                
 Hagerstown, MD (g)
 $12,285
 $14,359
 $(1,024) $25,620
 $1,574
 9/30/2014 2000
Crossroads Annex:                
 Lafayette, LA (g)
 1,659
 7,091
 
 8,750
 821
 12/4/2013 2013
Crossroads Commons:                
 Plover, WI (g)
 1,000
 4,515
 75
 5,590
 612
 12/10/2013 2012
CVS:                
 Arnold, MO (g)
 2,043
 2,367
 
 4,410
 246
 12/13/2013 2013
 Asheville, NC (g)
 1,108
 1,084
 
 2,192
 163
 4/26/2012 1998
 Austin, TX (g)
 1,076
 3,475
 
 4,551
 359
 12/13/2013 2013
 Bainbridge, GA (g)
 444
 1,682
 47
 2,173
 247
 6/27/2012 1998
 Bloomington, IN (g)
 1,620
 2,957
 
 4,577
 308
 12/13/2013 2012
 Blue Springs, MO (g)
 395
 2,722
 
 3,117
 283
 12/13/2013 2013
 Bridgeton, MO (g)
 2,056
 2,362
 
 4,418
 246
 12/13/2013 2013
 Cartersville, GA (g)
 2,547
 
 
 2,547
 
 10/22/2012 2009
 Charleston, SC (g)
 869
 1,009
 
 1,878
 152
 4/26/2012 1998
 Chesapeake, VA (g)
 1,044
 3,053
 
 4,097
 324
 12/13/2013 2013
 Chicago, IL (g)
 1,832
 4,255
 
 6,087
 510
 3/20/2013 2008
 Cicero, IN (g)
 487
 3,099
 
 3,586
 322
 12/13/2013 2013
 Corpus Christi, TX (g)
 648
 2,557
 
 3,205
 371
 4/19/2012 1998
 Danville, IN (g)
 424
 2,105
 
 2,529
 196
 7/16/2014 1998
 Eminence, KY (g)
 872
 2,511
 
 3,383
 258
 12/13/2013 2013
 Florence, AL $1,735
 1,030
 1,446
 
 2,476
 181
 3/27/2013 2000
 Goose Creek, SC (g)
 1,022
 1,980
 
 3,002
 204
 12/13/2013 2013
 Greenwood, IN (g)
 912
 3,549
 
 4,461
 399
 7/11/2013 1999
 Hanover Township, NJ (g)
 4,746
 
 
 4,746
 
 12/18/2013 2012
 Hazlet, NJ (g)
 3,047
 3,610
 
 6,657
 373
 12/13/2013 2013
 Honesdale, PA (g)
 1,206
 3,342
 
 4,548
 356
 12/13/2013 2013
 Independence, MO (g)
 359
 2,242
 
 2,601
 234
 12/13/2013 2013
 Indianapolis, IN (g)
 1,110
 2,484
 
 3,594
 258
 12/13/2013 2013
 Irving, TX (g)
 745
 3,034
 
 3,779
 406
 10/5/2012 2000
 Jacksonville, FL (g)
 2,182
 3,817
 
 5,999
 340
 7/16/2014 2004
 Janesville, WI (g)
 736
 2,545
 
 3,281
 264
 12/13/2013 2013
 Katy, TX (g)
 1,149
 2,462
 
 3,611
 250
 12/13/2013 2013
 Lincoln, NE (g)
 2,534
 3,014
 
 5,548
 312
 12/13/2013 2013
 London, KY (g)
 1,445
 2,661
 
 4,106
 294
 9/10/2013 2013
 Middletown, NY (g)
 665
 5,483
 
 6,148
 562
 12/13/2013 2013
 North Wilkesboro, NC (g)
 332
 2,369
 
 2,701
 252
 10/25/2013 1999
 Poplar Bluff, MO (g)
 1,861
 2,211
 
 4,072
 231
 12/13/2013 2013
 Salem, NH (g)
 3,456
 2,351
 
 5,807
 244
 11/18/2013 2013
 San Antonio, TX (g)
 1,893
 1,848
 
 3,741
 194
 12/13/2013 2013
 Sand Springs, OK (g)
 1,765
 2,283
 
 4,048
 239
 12/13/2013 2013
 Santa Fe, NM (g)
 2,243
 4,619
 
 6,862
 472
 12/13/2013 2013
 Sedalia, MO (g)
 466
 2,318
 
 2,784
 242
 12/13/2013 2013
 St. John, MO (g)
 1,546
 2,601
 
 4,147
 270
 12/13/2013 2013
 Temple Hills, MD (g)
 1,817
 2,989
 
 4,806
 325
 9/30/2013 2001

S-4

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Dollar General (continued):
Spring, TX(h)$277 $1,132 $$1,409 $213 9/30/20132013
Springfield, IL(h)205 934 1,139 153 9/17/20142014
St. Louis, MO(h)229 1,102 1,331 207 12/31/20132013
St. Louis, MO(h)240 1,118 1,358 208 1/15/20142013
Talladega, AL$— 161 859 1,020 12/21/20202014
Wakarusa, IN— 243 1,073 1,316 12/21/20202012
Weslaco, TX(h)141 848 989 144 9/5/20142014
Wolcottville, IN— 183 1,012 1,195 12/21/20202013
Duluth Trading:
Denton, TX— 1,662 2,918 4,580 12/21/20202017
Madison, AL— 1,174 3,603 4,777 12/21/20202019
Noblesville, IN— 1,212 3,436 4,648 12/21/20202003
East West Commons:
Austell, GA13,000 10,094 16,034 3,943 30,071 3,370 9/30/20142002
Evergreen Marketplace:
Evergreen Park, IL(h)2,823 6,239 9,062 1,487 9/6/20132013
Fairlane Green II:
Allen Park, MI— 1,409 14,634 16,043 18 12/21/20202015
Family Dollar:
Adelanto, CA(h)463 1,711 2,174 274 11/14/20142014
Bearden, AR— 52 760 812 12/21/20202014
Bessemer, AL(h)201 1,043 1,244 196 12/27/20132013
Birmingham, AL(h)500 831 1,331 159 12/27/20132013
Brooksville, FL(h)206 791 997 150 12/18/20132013
Cabot, AR— 231 1,137 1,368 12/21/20202014
Cathedral City, CA(h)658 1,908 2,566 315 9/19/20142014
Cheyenne, WY(h)148 986 1,134 176 4/23/20142014
Coachella, CA(h)450 1,634 2,084 293 2/19/20142013
Columbus, OH— 252 1,251 1,503 12/21/20202014
Empire, CA(h)239 1,527 1,766 261 6/27/20142014
Ft. Lauderdale, FL(h)443 1,361 1,804 245 12/18/20132013
Fresno, CA(h)488 1,553 2,041 282 2/19/20142013
Hobbs, NM— 243 1,084 1,327 12/21/20202006
Holtville, CA(h)317 1,609 1,926 289 2/19/20142013
Indio, CA(h)393 1,636 2,029 279 6/25/20142014
Irvington, AL(h)217 814 1,031 157 12/27/20132013
Jay, FL(h)190 1,002 1,192 195 2/25/20142013
Jonesboro, GA(h)297 1,098 1,395 202 2/14/20142013
Kissimmee, FL(h)622 1,226 1,848 211 8/27/20142014
LaBelle, FL(h)268 1,037 1,305 199 2/28/20142014
Lake Elsinor, CA(h)417 1,682 2,099 298 3/3/20142013
Lakeland, FL(h)353 937 1,290 167 6/30/20142014
Lewiston, ME— 271 1,157 1,428 12/21/20202014
Little Rock, CA(h)499 1,730 2,229 267 2/19/20152014
Melbourne, FL(h)362 883 1,245 162 2/28/20142014
Morgan, UT— 235 1,068 1,303 12/21/20202013
New Roads, LA— 190 674 864 12/21/20202015
Oshkosh, WI(h)361 815 1,176 151 2/25/20142013
Palmdale, CA(h)372 1,822 2,194 275 3/30/20152014
Pensacola, FL(h)509 791 1,300 147 3/27/20142014
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
CVS (continued):                
 Vineland, NJ (g)
 $813
 $2,926
 $
 $3,739
 $313
 12/13/2013 2010
 Waynesboro, VA (g)
 986
 2,708
 
 3,694
 281
 12/13/2013 2013
 West Monroe, LA (g)
 1,738
 2,136
 
 3,874
 224
 12/13/2013 2013
Darien Towne Center:                
 Darien, IL $12,200
 6,718
 11,951
 900
 19,569
 1,807
 12/17/2013 1994
DaVita:                
 Riverview, MI (g)
 199
 2,322
 
 2,521
 242
 9/4/2014 2012
Decatur Commons:                
 Decatur, AL 7,000
 2,478
 9,333
 848
 12,659
 1,183
 7/10/2013 2004
Deltona Commons:                
 Deltona, FL 4,767
 1,424
 7,760
 
 9,184
 907
 6/18/2013 2007
Dick’s PetSmart Center:                
 Oshkosh, WI (g)
 1,445
 6,599
 
 8,044
 287
 9/23/2016 2015
Dick’s Sporting Goods:                
 Oklahoma City, OK (g)
 1,198
 7,838
 
 9,036
 1,129
 12/21/2012 2012
 Oklahoma City, OK 5,858
 685
 10,587
 
 11,272
 1,487
 12/31/2012 2012
Dollar General:                
 Abbeville, AL (g)
 294
 1,302
 
 1,596
 113
 10/3/2014 2014
 Akron, AL (g)
 69
 771
 
 840
 92
 8/6/2013 2013
 Akron, OH (g)
 112
 1,099
 
 1,211
 128
 11/1/2013 2013
 Alliance, NE (g)
 97
 812
 
 909
 112
 4/9/2013 2013
 Alton, TX (g)
 94
 922
 
 1,016
 82
 9/5/2014 2014
 Arapahoe, NE (g)
 44
 873
 
 917
 78
 9/5/2014 2014
 Asheville, NC (g)
 379
 753
 
 1,132
 102
 6/17/2013 2013
 Ashville, AL 666
 255
 678
 
 933
 103
 12/21/2012 2012
 Atmore, AL (g)
 243
 858
 
 1,101
 90
 2/25/2014 2014
 Bainbridge, OH (g)
 106
 1,175
 
 1,281
 147
 9/13/2013 2013
 Belle, MO (g)
 51
 880
 
 931
 78
 9/5/2014 2014
 Berry, AL (g)
 104
 1,196
 
 1,300
 107
 9/26/2014 2014
 Bessemer, AL (g)
 142
 941
 
 1,083
 110
 9/27/2013 2013
 Bloomfield, NE (g)
 50
 845
 
 895
 70
 12/16/2014 2014
 Blue Rapids, KS (g)
 52
 880
 
 932
 77
 10/22/2014 2014
 Bluefield, WV (g)
 337
 686
 
 1,023
 58
 10/15/2014 2014
 Bokchito, OK (g)
 59
 859
 
 918
 123
 2/27/2013 2013
 Botkins, OH (g)
 130
 991
 
 1,121
 122
 9/27/2013 2013
 Brandon, SD (g)
 292
 871
 
 1,163
 76
 10/31/2014 2014
 Breaux Bridge, LA 840
 225
 1,007
 
 1,232
 139
 11/30/2012 2012
 Broken Bow, NE (g)
 91
 878
 
 969
 94
 11/1/2013 2013
 Brownsville, TX 822
 264
 943
 
 1,207
 123
 11/30/2012 2012
 Buffalo, NY (g)
 122
 1,099
 
 1,221
 89
 12/5/2014 2014
 Clay, AL 792
 305
 768
 
 1,073
 112
 2/8/2013 2012
 Cleveland, TX 684
 158
 856
 
 1,014
 112
 11/30/2012 2012
 Columbus, OH (g)
 279
 1,248
 
 1,527
 146
 11/7/2013 2013
 Conroe, TX 756
 167
 946
 
 1,113
 123
 12/18/2012 2012

S-5

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Family Dollar (continued):
Pine Lake, GA(h)$639 $897 $$1,536 $157 8/26/20142014
Riverside, CA(h)736 1,558 2,294 273 4/4/20142014
Roswell, NM$— 199 921 1,120 12/21/20202014
Salina, UT— 211 1,262 1,473 12/21/20202014
San Antonio, TX— 409 914 1,323 12/21/20202014
San Antonio, TX— 347 1,148 1,495 12/21/20201995
San Jacinto, CA(h)430 1,682 2,112 283 7/18/20142014
Statesboro, GA(h)347 800 — 1,147 150 2/14/20142013
Stockton, CA(h)202 1,817 2,019 297 9/19/20142014
Taft, CA(h)255 1,422 1,677 275 8/23/20132013
Talladega, AL— 222 951 1,173 12/21/20202014
Tampa (Cragmont), FL(h)563 737 1,300 141 12/18/20132013
Tampa (Forest), FL(h)482 920 1,402 173 12/18/20132013
Tenn Colony, TX— 150 834 984 12/21/20202014
Terra Bella, CA(h)332 1,394 1,726 251 2/19/20142013
Tuscaloosa, AL(h)534 817 1,351 157 12/27/20132013
Valley, AL— 180 983 1,163 12/21/20202014
Walthourville, GA— 290 1,058 1,348 12/21/20201995
Warrenville, SC— 207 986 1,193 12/21/20202013
Flower Foods:
Orlando, FL(h)418 387 805 65 9/11/20142013
Waldorf, MD(h)398 1,045 1,443 194 9/11/20142013
Food 4 Less:
Atwater, CA(h)1,383 5,271 6,654 1,068 11/27/20132002
Fountain Square:
Brookfield, WI(h)6,508 28,634 25 35,167 3,689 1/17/20172006
Fourth Creek Landing:
Statesville, NC(h)1,375 7,795 9,170 2,076 3/26/20132012
Fresenius Medical Care:
West Plains, MO(h)557 3,097 3,654 520 7/2/20142014
Fresh Market Center:
Glen Ellyn, IL4,750 2,767 6,403 (3,494)5,676 153 9/30/20142014
Fresh Thyme:
Indianapolis, IN(h)1,087 6,019 7,106 1,089 10/31/20142014
Lafayette, IN— 1,173 6,316 7,489 12/21/20202006
Northville, MI(h)1,598 7,796 9,394 1,094 12/21/20152015
Ypsilanti, MI— 3,168 5,719 8,887 12/21/20202017
Fresh Thyme & DSW:
Fort Wayne, IN(h)1,740 4,153 612 6,505 836 9/30/20141985
Giant Eagle:
Seven Fields, PA(h)1,574 13,659 15,233 2,345 5/7/20142005
Harbor Town Center:
Manitowoc, WI9,750 3,568 13,209 (1,799)14,978 895 4/24/20152005
Haverty Furniture:
Midland, TX(h)709 1,294 2,003 384 8/7/20132012
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Dollar General (continued):                
 Crystal Springs, MS (g)
 $463
 $3,027
 $
 $3,490
 $270
 8/6/2014 2013
 Cullman, AL (g)
 159
 824
 
 983
 76
 8/4/2014 2014
 Decatur, IL (g)
 133
 986
 
 1,119
 91
 6/18/2014 2014
 Decatur, IL (g)
 219
 964
 
 1,183
 83
 9/8/2014 2014
 Delcambre, LA (g)
 169
 1,025
 
 1,194
 118
 9/27/2013 2013
 Delhi, LA (g)
 301
 1,033
 
 1,334
 120
 8/9/2013 2013
 Deridder, LA (g)
 135
 923
 
 1,058
 106
 9/27/2013 2013
 Deridder, LA (g)
 176
 905
 
 1,081
 106
 8/9/2013 2013
 Des Moines, IA (g)
 166
 943
 
 1,109
 111
 8/9/2013 2012
 Dora, AL (g)
 124
 935
 
 1,059
 83
 9/26/2014 2014
 Dundee, MI (g)
 296
 1,047
 
 1,343
 111
 11/26/2013 2013
 Edinburg, TX (g)
 146
 809
 
 955
 76
 7/31/2014 2014
 Eight Mile, AL (g)
 110
 865
 
 975
 83
 6/23/2014 2014
 Elk Point, SD (g)
 97
 839
 
 936
 76
 9/22/2014 2014
 Ellerslie, GA (g)
 247
 797
 
 1,044
 81
 4/17/2014 2014
 Eufaula, AL (g)
 300
 930
 
 1,230
 87
 7/22/2014 2014
 Farmington, NM (g)
 175
 919
 
 1,094
 81
 9/5/2014 2014
 Fort Valley, GA (g)
 514
 2,436
 
 2,950
 311
 7/9/2013 2013
 Fred, TX (g)
 93
 929
 
 1,022
 101
 12/19/2013 2013
 Fruitport, MI (g)
 100
 968
 
 1,068
 88
 6/25/2014 2014
 Geneva, AL $738
 204
 815
 
 1,019
 122
 12/21/2012 2012
 Geraldine, AL (g)
 220
 1,146
 
 1,366
 113
 5/30/2014 2014
 Greenwell Springs, LA 870
 444
 841
 
 1,285
 118
 11/30/2012 2012
 Groveport, OH 822
 416
 813
 
 1,229
 114
 3/15/2013 2013
 Hamilton, AL (g)
 208
 1,024
 
 1,232
 89
 10/16/2014 2014
 Hanceville, AL 2,029
 1,232
 1,488
 
 2,720
 234
 11/21/2012 2012
 Harlingen, TX (g)
 144
 853
 
 997
 82
 6/20/2014 2014
 Harvest, AL 684
 261
 691
 
 952
 105
 12/21/2012 2012
 Harviell, MO (g)
 50
 818
 
 868
 85
 3/31/2014 2014
 Hastings, NE (g)
 177
 850
 
 1,027
 74
 10/22/2014 2014
 Hayneville, AL (g)
 249
 1,181
 
 1,430
 109
 8/15/2014 2014
 Hillsboro, OH (g)
 262
 956
 
 1,218
 81
 9/25/2014 2014
 Hinton, WV (g)
 199
 1,367
 
 1,566
 118
 8/18/2014 2014
 Homeworth, OH (g)
 110
 1,057
 
 1,167
 114
 10/18/2013 2013
 Houston, TX 966
 311
 1,102
 
 1,413
 143
 12/18/2012 2012
 Houston, TX (g)
 255
 1,393
 
 1,648
 151
 10/18/2013 2013
 Huntsville, AL 768
 177
 847
 
 1,024
 126
 12/21/2012 2012
 Independence, MO 828
 170
 1,072
 
 1,242
 145
 12/18/2012 2012
 Kansas City, MO (g)
 283
 1,068
 
 1,351
 121
 10/18/2013 2013
 Kansas City, MO (g)
 233
 1,054
 
 1,287
 117
 11/1/2013 2013
 Kasson, MN (g)
 138
 888
 
 1,026
 86
 8/15/2014 2014
 Kearney, NE (g)
 141
 851
 
 992
 95
 11/20/2013 2013
 Kinston, AL 642
 170
 718
 
 888
 109
 12/21/2012 2012
 Kolona, IA (g)
 81
 868
 
 949
 79
 8/15/2014 2014

S-6

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
HEB Center:
Waxahachie, TX$7,000 $3,465 $7,952 $273 $11,690 $1,817 6/27/20121997
Hobby Lobby:
Lewisville, TX(h)2,184 8,977 11,161 1,758 11/26/20132013
Home Depot:
Lincoln, NE(h)6,339 5,937 12,276 832 10/22/20151993
North Canton, OH(h)2,203 12,012 360 14,575 2,621 12/20/20121998
Houma Crossing:
Houma, LA12,264 1,076 20,028 21,104 28 12/21/20202008
Hy-Vee:
Omaha, NE— 1,842 7,909 9,751 11 12/21/20202016
Jewel-Osco:
Plainfield, IL(h)11,151 11,151 578 11/14/20182001
Kirkland's:
Dothan, AL(h)486 946 1,432 211 8/5/20142014
Kohl's:
Chartlottesville, VA(h)3,929 12,280 16,209 2,057 7/28/20142011
Eagan, MN— 3,581 3,751 7,332 12/21/20201996
Easton, MD(h)2,962 2,661 5,623 335 12/2/20151992
Kroger:
Bay City, MI— 718 5,058 5,776 12/21/20201994
Shelton, WA(h)1,180 11,040 12,220 2,150 4/30/20141994
Whitehall, OH(h)581 6,628 224 7,433 1,363 12/16/20131994
Kum & Go:
Conway, AR(h)510 2,577 3,087 428 6/13/20142014
LA Fitness:
Bloomfield Township, MI(h)2,287 10,075 12,362 2,141 6/21/20132008
Columbus, OH(h)1,013 6,734 7,747 1,059 4/29/20152014
Garland, TX(h)2,005 6,861 41 8,907 1,267 12/20/20132013
Houston, TX(h)5,764 5,994 11,758 1,161 9/30/20132013
New Lenox, IL(h)1,965 6,257 8,222 823 12/21/20152015
Riverside, CA(h)2,557 9,951 12,508 1,976 8/2/20132010
Lafayette Pavilions:
Lafayette, IN(h)7,632 42,497 (3,245)46,884 1,067 2/6/20152006
Lawton Marketplace:
Lawton, OK19,247 3,598 25,228 28,829 43 12/21/20202001
Lord Salisbury Center:
Salisbury, MD(h)6,949 12,179 (2,319)16,809 370 3/11/20162005
Lowe's:
Adrian, MI(h)2,604 5,036 30 7,670 1,274 9/27/20131996
Alpharetta, GA(h)7,979 9,630 403 18,012 1,588 5/29/20151998
Asheboro, NC(h)1,098 6,722 7,820 1,187 6/23/20141994
Cincinnati, OH(h)14,092 14,092 2/10/20142001
Columbia, SC(h)3,943 6,353 750 11,046 1,467 9/12/20131994
Covington, LA(h)10,233 10,233 8/20/20142002
Hermitage, PA— 2,279 12,580 14,859 16 12/21/20202016
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Dollar General (continued):                
 Lake Charles, LA (g)
 $146
 $989
 $
 $1,135
 $116
 8/9/2013 2013
 Lamesa, TX (g)
 75
 803
 
 878
 76
 7/31/2014 2014
 Lansing, MI (g)
 232
 939
 
 1,171
 85
 6/25/2014 2014
 Lebanon, TN (g)
 177
 882
 
 1,059
 80
 6/30/2014 2012
 Leicester, NC (g)
 134
 800
 
 934
 99
 6/17/2013 2013
 Lima, OH $810
 156
 1,040
 
 1,196
 137
 11/30/2012 2012
 Linden, AL (g)
 317
 746
 
 1,063
 92
 7/11/2013 2013
 Lone Jack, MO (g)
 152
 960
 
 1,112
 94
 5/16/2014 2014
 Los Fresnos, TX (g)
 55
 867
 
 922
 77
 9/19/2014 2014
 Los Lunas, NM (g)
 113
 857
 
 970
 84
 5/14/2014 2014
 Louisburg, KS (g)
 324
 936
 
 1,260
 90
 6/25/2014 2014
 Loveland, OH (g)
 241
 1,065
 
 1,306
 124
 12/12/2013 2013
 Lubbock, TX 744
 468
 641
 
 1,109
 90
 12/18/2012 2012
 Manhattan, KS (g)
 194
 921
 
 1,115
 103
 11/20/2013 2013
 Mansfield, OH (g)
 72
 1,226
 
 1,298
 127
 12/12/2013 2013
 Maple Lake, MN (g)
 92
 893
 
 985
 83
 10/10/2014 2014
 Maynardville, TN 750
 238
 754
 
 992
 116
 11/30/2012 2012
 Millbrook, AL (g)
 320
 1,175
 
 1,495
 110
 7/22/2014 2014
 Mission, TX (g)
 182
 858
 
 1,040
 76
 9/5/2014 2014
 Mobile, AL (g)
 139
 1,005
 
 1,144
 115
 10/18/2013 2013
 Mobile, AL (g)
 410
 1,059
 
 1,469
 132
 6/17/2013 2013
 Monroeville, OH (g)
 131
 1,069
 
 1,200
 116
 10/4/2013 2013
 Montgomery, AL (g)
 140
 909
 
 1,049
 79
 10/24/2014 2014
 Moose Lake, MN (g)
 140
 937
 
 1,077
 86
 10/10/2014 2014
 Moroa, IL (g)
 111
 921
 
 1,032
 85
 6/26/2014 2014
 Mt. Vernon, IL (g)
 177
 985
 
 1,162
 93
 5/30/2014 2014
 Nashville, GA 2,088
 215
 2,533
 
 2,748
 348
 3/1/2013 2013
 Nashville, MI (g)
 103
 1,255
 
 1,358
 124
 1/24/2014 2013
 Navarre, OH (g)
 153
 1,005
 
 1,158
 111
 9/27/2013 2013
 Neoga, IL (g)
 94
 860
 
 954
 75
 8/8/2014 2010
 Ness City, KS (g)
 21
 860
 
 881
 89
 3/20/2014 2014
 New Philadelphia, OH (g)
 129
 1,100
 
 1,229
 121
 9/27/2013 2013
 New Washington, OH (g)
 99
 975
 
 1,074
 120
 9/13/2013 2013
 Newark, OH 792
 222
 946
 
 1,168
 132
 3/15/2013 2013
 Nitro, WV (g)
 451
 1,034
 
 1,485
 94
 6/30/2014 2013
 Nixa, MO (g)
 235
 806
 
 1,041
 81
 4/3/2014 2014
 North Lewisburg, OH (g)
 59
 1,008
 
 1,067
 119
 11/22/2013 2013
 Onawa, IA (g)
 176
 842
 
 1,018
 81
 6/26/2014 2014
 Opelousas, LA (g)
 92
 947
 
 1,039
 107
 10/4/2013 2013
 Ortonville, MN (g)
 113
 907
 
 1,020
 86
 9/5/2014 2014
 Osceola, NE (g)
 194
 835
 
 1,029
 62
 4/2/2015 2014
 Oxford, AL (g)
 465
 783
 
 1,248
 91
 10/18/2013 2013
 Palestine, IL (g)
 155
 893
 
 1,048
 83
 6/26/2014 2014
 Parchment, MI (g)
 168
 1,162
 
 1,330
 105
 6/25/2014 2014

S-7

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Lowe’s (continued):
Lilburn, GA(h)$8,817 $9,380 $385 $18,582 $1,539 5/29/20151999
Mansfield, OH(h)873 8,256 26 9,155 1,492 6/12/20141992
Marietta, GA(h)7,471 8,404 392 16,267 1,400 5/29/20151997
Oxford, AL(h)1,668 7,622 369 9,659 1,804 6/28/20131999
Tuscaloosa, AL(h)4,908 4,786 9,703 986 10/29/20131993
Woodstock, GA(h)7,316 8,879 392 16,587 1,476 5/29/20151997
Zanesville, OH(h)2,161 8,375 297 10,833 1,626 12/11/20131995
Mattress Firm:
Ashtabula, OH(h)301 1,965 (453)1,813 36 3/23/20162015
Draper, UT$— 860 1,419 2,279 12/21/20202014
Lake City, FL— 517 1,241 1,758 12/21/20202004
Mattress Firm & Aspen Dental:
Vienna, WV— 774 2,466 3,240 521 9/15/20142014
Mattress Firm & Five Guys:
Muskegon, MI(h)813 1,766 (314)2,265 33 8/29/20142014
McAlister's Deli:
Lawton, OK(h)805 1,057 1,862 194 5/1/20142013
McGowin Park:
Mobile, AL42,765 2,243 69,357 71,600 8,187 4/26/20172016
Melody Mountain:
Ashland, KY5,940 1,286 9,879 (1,874)9,291 231 9/1/20152013
Merchants Tire & Auto:
Wake Forest, NC(h)782 1,730 2,512 241 9/1/20152005
Mister Car Wash:
Athens, AL(h)383 1,150 1,533 109 9/12/20172008
Decatur, AL(h)257 559 816 57 9/12/20172005
Decatur, AL(h)486 1,253 1,739 136 9/12/20172014
Decatur, AL(h)359 1,152 1,511 124 9/12/20172007
Hartselle, AL(h)360 569 929 60 9/12/20172007
Madison, AL(h)562 1,139 1,701 126 9/12/20172012
Morganton Heights:
Morganton, NC22,800 7,032 29,763 30 36,825 6,167 4/29/20152013
National Tire & Battery:
Cedar Hill, TX(h)469 1,951 2,420 402 12/18/20122006
Cypress, TX(h)910 2,224 3,134 332 9/1/20152005
Flower Mound, TX(h)779 2,449 3,228 351 9/1/20152005
Fort Worth, TX(h)936 1,234 2,170 242 8/23/20132005
Fort Worth, TX(h)730 2,309 3,039 331 9/1/20152005
Frisco, TX(h)844 1,608 2,452 313 8/23/20132007
Montgomery, IL(h)516 2,494 3,010 517 1/15/20132007
North Richland Hills, TX(h)513 2,579 3,092 380 9/1/20152005
Pasadena, TX(h)908 2,307 3,215 344 9/1/20152005
Pearland, TX(h)1,016 2,040 3,056 298 9/1/20152005
Plano, TX(h)1,292 2,197 3,489 320 9/1/20152005
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Dollar General (continued):                
 Park Hill, OK (g)
 $91
 $887
 $
 $978
 $119
 1/4/2013 2012
 Parsons, TN (g)
 166
 1,136
 
 1,302
 108
 7/16/2014 2013
 Phenix City, AL (g)
 331
 718
 
 1,049
 90
 6/17/2013 2013
 Piedmont, AL $1,980
 1,037
 1,579
 
 2,616
 250
 11/21/2012 2012
 Pike Road, AL (g)
 477
 772
 
 1,249
 93
 8/21/2013 2013
 Plain City, OH (g)
 187
 1,097
 
 1,284
 116
 11/26/2013 2013
 Port Clinton, OH (g)
 120
 1,070
 
 1,190
 113
 11/22/2013 2013
 Princeton, MO (g)
 155
 1,159
 
 1,314
 101
 10/10/2014 2014
 Pueblo, CO (g)
 144
 909
 
 1,053
 116
 1/4/2013 2012
 Ragley, LA (g)
 196
 877
 
 1,073
 104
 8/9/2013 2013
 Rainsville, AL (g)
 290
 1,267
 
 1,557
 115
 8/13/2014 2014
 Ravenna, MI (g)
 199
 958
 
 1,157
 95
 1/24/2014 2013
 Rayne, LA 702
 125
 910
 
 1,035
 124
 12/18/2012 2012
 Roanoke, IL (g)
 93
 846
 
 939
 81
 5/16/2014 2014
 Romney, IN (g)
 87
 827
 
 914
 73
 7/7/2014 2011
 Romulus, MI (g)
 274
 1,171
 
 1,445
 114
 3/7/2014 2013
 Russell, KS (g)
 54
 899
 
 953
 83
 8/5/2014 2014
 San Antonio, TX (g)
 295
 743
 
 1,038
 76
 7/31/2014 2014
 San Carlos, TX (g)
 70
 1,063
 
 1,133
 101
 6/20/2014 2014
 Seale, AL (g)
 259
 767
 
 1,026
 89
 10/28/2013 2013
 Seminole, AL (g)
 175
 829
 
 1,004
 101
 7/15/2013 2013
 Shelby, MI (g)
 128
 1,033
 
 1,161
 102
 1/24/2014 2013
 Slocomb, AL (g)
 124
 918
 
 1,042
 96
 2/25/2014 2014
 Snead, AL (g)
 126
 1,137
 
 1,263
 102
 9/26/2014 2014
 South Bay, FL (g)
 258
 1,262
 
 1,520
 119
 5/7/2014 2013
 Spring, TX (g)
 277
 1,132
 
 1,409
 125
 9/30/2013 2013
 Springfield, IL (g)
 205
 934
 
 1,139
 80
 9/17/2014 2014
 Springfield, MO (g)
 171
 810
 
 981
 76
 7/14/2014 2014
 Springfield, NE (g)
 172
 864
 
 1,036
 85
 5/12/2014 2014
 Springfield, OH (g)
 125
 1,000
 
 1,125
 115
 9/27/2013 2013
 St. Louis, MO (g)
 229
 1,102
 
 1,331
 119
 12/31/2013 2013
 St. Louis, MO (g)
 240
 1,118
 
 1,358
 118
 1/15/2014 2013
 Superior, NE (g)
 230
 917
 
 1,147
 102
 11/26/2013 2013
 Temple, GA (g)
 200
 917
 
 1,117
 114
 5/15/2013 2013
 Theodore, AL (g)
 248
 763
 
 1,011
 97
 5/15/2013 2013
 Thibodaux, LA (g)
 211
 1,083
 
 1,294
 124
 9/27/2013 2013
 Toney, AL 642
 86
 792
 
 878
 113
 3/21/2013 2012
 Topeka, KS (g)
 159
 873
 
 1,032
 69
 2/25/2015 2014
 Urbana, OH (g)
 133
 1,051
 
 1,184
 103
 5/29/2014 2013
 Volga, SD (g)
 51
 784
 
 835
 71
 9/5/2014 2014
 Waco, TX (g)
 26
 922
 
 948
 95
 6/20/2014 2014
 Wagener, SC (g)
 477
 1,169
 
 1,646
 99
 9/16/2014 2014
 Wakefield, KS (g)
 78
 929
 
 1,007
 108
 9/30/2013 2013
 Waterloo, IA (g)
 330
 908
 
 1,238
 76
 11/5/2014 2014

S-8

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
National Tire & Battery (continued):
Tomball, TX(h)$838 $2,229 $$3,067 $322 9/1/20152005
Natural Grocers:
Idaho Falls, ID(h)833 2,316 3,149 422 2/14/20142013
Waupaca, WI$— 1,286 3,727 5,013 12/21/20202017
Nordstrom Rack:
Tampa, FL6,880 3,371 6,402 1,583 11,356 1,748 4/16/20122010
O'Reilly Automotive:
Bennettsville, SC— 361 1,207 1,568 12/21/20202015
Calyton, GA(h)501 945 1,446 121 1/29/20162015
Flowood, MS— 506 1,288 1,794 12/21/20202014
Iron Mountain, MI— 249 1,400 1,649 12/21/20202014
Owenboro Towne Center:
Owensboro, KY14,160 3,807 16,259 862 20,928 2,474 1/12/20161996
Parkway Centre South:
Grove City, OH14,250 7,027 18,223 (2,269)22,981 1,054 7/15/20162005
Pecanland Plaza:
Monroe, LA(h)2,206 18,957 (3,265)17,898 334 10/13/20152008
Petsmart:
Wilkesboro, NC(h)447 1,710 2,157 402 4/13/20122011
Petsmart/Old Navy:
Reynoldsburg, OH3,720 1,295 4,077 5,372 981 12/14/20122012
Pick 'N Save:
Heber City, UT— 1,160 9,111 10,271 12 12/21/20202016
Pewaukee, WI(h)1,323 6,761 257 8,341 1,311 8/13/20141999
Sheboygan, WI(h)2,003 10,695 12,698 2,341 9/6/20122012
South Milwaukee, WI(h)1,126 5,706 6,832 1,056 11/6/20132005
Waterford, WI— 731 4,078 4,809 12/21/20202017
Plainfield Marketplace:
Plainfield, IL(h)3,167 14,788 (3,827)14,128 12/3/20152002
Plaza San Mateo:
Albuquerque, NM— 2,867 11,582 (4,011)10,438 311 5/2/20142014
Popeyes:
Independence, MO(h)333 680 1,013 115 6/27/20142005
Poplar Springs Plaza:
Duncan, SC5,000 1,862 5,277 517 7,656 1,270 5/24/20131995
Raising Cane's:
Murphy, TX— 495 2,854 3,349 12/21/20201994
Reno, NV— 1,841 2,259 4,100 12/21/20202014
Rolling Acres Plaza:
Lady Lake, FL21,930 7,540 26,839 (4,093)30,286 1,302 9/1/20162005
Rushmore Crossing:
Rapid City, SD22,046 7,066 33,019 (12,059)28,026 569 1/2/20142012
Rapid City, SD(h)883 4,128 (1,348)3,663 87 1/2/20142012
Safeway:
Juneau, AK— 6,174 8,792 14,966 11 12/21/20202017
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Dollar General (continued):               
 Weslaco, TX (g)
 $141
 $848
 $
 $989
 $75
 9/5/2014 2014
 Weston, MO (g)
 117
 1,012
 
 1,129
 121
 7/17/2013 2013
 Wetumpka, AL (g)
 290
 779
 
 1,069
 77
 5/29/2014 2014
 Whitehouse, OH (g)
 134
 1,144
 
 1,278
 123
 10/18/2013 2013
 Whitwell, TN $870
 159
 1,035
 
 1,194
 159
 11/30/2012 2012
 Wilmer, AL (g)
 99
 775
 
 874
 93
 8/5/2013 2013
 Winsted, MN (g)
 152
 841
 
 993
 81
 9/29/2014 2014
 Wisner, NE (g)
 37
 773
 
 810
 76
 5/12/2014 2014
 Woodville, OH 786
 169
 1,009
 
 1,178
 140
 2/8/2013 2013
 Yatesville, GA 666
 120
 797
 
 917
 114
 3/25/2013 2013
Dollar Tree/Petco:                
 Humble, TX (g)
 720
 2,543
 
 3,263
 336
 2/11/2013 2011
Earth Fare:                
 Huntersville, NC 3,183
 1,439
 2,973
 
 4,412
 405
 2/28/2013 2011
East Manchester Village Center:                
 Manchester, PA 8,300
 2,517
 12,672
 183
 15,372
 1,425
 12/19/2013 2009
East West Commons:                
 Austell, GA 13,000
 10,094
 16,034
 3,206
 29,334
 1,668
 9/30/2014 2002
Emerald Place:                
 Greenwood, SC 6,250
 2,042
 9,942
 
 11,984
 1,207
 6/28/2013 2012
Evergreen Marketplace:                
 Evergreen Park, IL (g)
 2,823
 6,239
 
 9,062
 875
 9/6/2013 2013
Family Center:                
 Riverdale, UT (g)
 21,716
 29,454
 (741) 50,429
 3,516
 2/28/2014 2008
Family Dollar:                
 Aberdeen, ID (g)
 101
 1,054
 
 1,155
 89
 10/24/2014 2014
 Adelanto, GA (g)
 463
 1,711
 
 2,174
 140
 11/14/2014 2014
 Aguila, AZ (g)
 129
 1,290
 
 1,419
 95
 2/13/2015 2014
 Albany, GA 
 347
 925
 
 1,272
 77
 11/7/2014 2014
 Apple Springs, TX 
 91
 804
 
 895
 68
 11/14/2014 2014
 Arkadelphia, AR (g)
 113
 738
 
 851
 56
 2/12/2015 2014
 Auburn, ME (g)
 217
 1,261
 
 1,478
 102
 4/15/2015 2014
 Bagley, MN (g)
 95
 1,114
 
 1,209
 111
 6/27/2014 2014
 Benavides, TX (g)
 27
 1,065
 
 1,092
 118
 2/26/2014 2013
 Berry, AL 
 122
 880
 
 1,002
 74
 11/14/2014 2014
 Bessemer, AL (g)
 201
 1,043
 
 1,244
 112
 12/27/2013 2013
 Broadway, VA 
 213
 1,153
 
 1,366
 100
 11/7/2014 2014
 Birmingham, AL (g)
 500
 831
 
 1,331
 91
 12/27/2013 2013
 Brooksville, FL (g)
 206
 791
 
 997
 86
 12/18/2013 2013
 Burkeville, TX (g)
 54
 900
 
 954
 86
 9/30/2014 2014
 Cascade, ID (g)
 267
 1,147
 
 1,414
 111
 2/4/2014 2013
 Cass Lake, MN (g)
 157
 1,107
 
 1,264
 110
 6/27/2014 2013
 Cathedral City, CA (g)
 658
 1,908
 
 2,566
 165
 9/19/2014 2014
 Charlotte, TX (g)
 118
 970
 
 1,088
 108
 2/26/2014 2014

S-9

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Sherwin Williams:
Macon, GA(h)$59 $659 $$718 $98 4/16/20152015
Shippensburg Market Place:
Shippensburg, PA(h)1,917 9,263 (3,530)7,650 185 9/18/20142002
Shoe Carnival & Buffalo Wild Wings:
Salina, KS$— 991 1,909 2,900 12/21/20202014
Shoppes at Stroud:
Stroud Township, PA(h)3,754 22,614 (2,220)24,148 1,226 10/29/20142007
Shoppes of Gary Farms:
Bowling Green, KY— 3,529 14,197 17,726 20 12/21/20202005
Shops at Abilene:
Abilene, TX14,989 5,142 19,684 24,826 30 12/21/20202014
Siemens:
Milford, OH— 4,137 23,153 27,290 42 12/21/20201991
Southwest Plaza:
Springfield, IL(h)2,992 48,935 (23,580)28,347 1,360 9/18/20142003
Spinx:
Simpsonville, SC(h)591 969 1,560 194 1/24/20132012
Springfield Commons:
Springfield, OH11,250 3,745 15,049 (4,182)14,612 168 5/5/20151995
Sprouts:
Bixby, OK(h)1,320 7,117 8,437 1,367 7/26/20132013
Lawrence, KS— 762 8,111 8,873 10 12/21/20202001
Steinhafels:
Greenfield, WI— 1,783 7,643 9,426 12/21/20201991
Stoneridge Village:
Jefferson City, MO6,500 1,830 9,351 11,182 1,886 6/30/20142012
Stop & Shop:
North Kingstown, RI— 639 2,057 2,696 12/21/20201979
Summerfield Crossing:
Riverview, FL7,310 6,130 6,753 (1,159)11,724 357 7/12/20132013
Sunbelt Rentals:
Canton, OH(h)147 1,679 138 1,964 415 10/24/20132013
Sunoco:
Palm Beach Gardens, FL(h)1,050 2,667 3,717 515 4/12/20132009
Palm City, FL(h)667 1,698 2,365 329 4/12/20132011
Palm Springs, FL(h)580 1,907 2,487 369 4/12/20132011
Sebastian, FL(h)490 2,128 2,618 412 4/12/20132009
Titusville, FL(h)626 2,534 3,160 490 4/12/20132009
Sutters Creek:
Rocky Mount, NC(h)1,458 2,616 283 4,357 607 1/31/20142012
Take 5:
Andrews, TX— 230 862 1,092 12/21/20201994
Bedford, TX— 283 837 1,120 12/21/20202009
Burleson, TX— 471 936 1,407 12/21/20201994
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Family Dollar (continued):               
 Cheyenne, WY (g)
 $148
 $986
 $
 $1,134
 $98
 4/23/2014 2014
 Coachella, CA (g)
 450
 1,634
 
 2,084
 165
 2/19/2014 2013
 Cocoa, FL (g)
 370
 1,092
 
 1,462
 95
 9/26/2014 2014
 Colmesneil, TX (g)
 172
 858
 
 1,030
 83
 2/4/2014 2013
 Columbia, SC (g)
 294
 824
 
 1,118
 71
 10/24/2014 2014
 Columbia, SC (g)
 332
 1,044
 
 1,376
 88
 10/24/2014 2014
 Comanche, TX (g)
 176
 1,145
 
 1,321
 102
 8/6/2014 2014
 Cordes Lakes, AZ (g)
 380
 1,421
 
 1,801
 120
 9/19/2014 2014
 Davenport, FL (g)
 298
 964
 
 1,262
 78
 12/5/2014 2014
 Davenport, IA (g)
 167
 918
 
 1,085
 77
 11/25/2014 2014
 Dawson, TX $
 41
 799
 
 840
 67
 11/14/2014 2014
 Deadwood, SD (g)
 132
 1,139
 
 1,271
 98
 9/18/2014 2014
 Des Moines, IA (g)
 290
 1,126
 
 1,416
 93
 11/25/2014 2014
 East Millinocket, ME (g)
 161
 1,004
 
 1,165
 90
 2/26/2015 2014
 Eden, TX (g)
 82
 903
 
 985
 94
 2/26/2014 2013
 Elizabethtown, NY (g)
 107
 671
 
 778
 66
 1/31/2014 2008
 Eloy, AZ (g)
 86
 1,587
 
 1,673
 130
 10/24/2014 2014
 Empire, CA (g)
 239
 1,527
 
 1,766
 141
 6/27/2014 2014
 Erwinville, LA (g)
 146
 765
 
 911
 54
 7/7/2015 2015
 Evans, CO (g)
 201
 817
 
 1,018
 69
 9/29/2014 2014
 Findlay, OH (g)
 326
 1,271
 
 1,597
 137
 2/26/2014 2013
 Folsom, LA (g)
 325
 788
 
 1,113
 70
 9/30/2014 2014
 Ft. Lauderdale, FL (g)
 443
 1,361
 
 1,804
 140
 12/18/2013 2013
 Fort Thomas, AZ (g)
 49
 1,173
 
 1,222
 116
 2/26/2014 2013
 Fort Worth, TX (g)
 532
 1,346
 
 1,878
 118
 9/5/2014 2014
 Franklin, NH (g)
 307
 1,214
 
 1,521
 81
 10/15/2015 2014
 Frederica, DE (g)
 392
 1,164
 
 1,556
 83
 3/6/2015 2014
 Fresno, CA (g)
 488
 1,553
 
 2,041
 159
 2/19/2014 2013
 Garrison, TX (g)
 61
 1,306
 
 1,367
 102
 12/18/2014 2014
 Georgetown, KY (g)
 607
 905
 
 1,512
 77
 11/21/2014 2014
 Gering, NE (g)
 244
 913
 
 1,157
 81
 9/26/2014 2014
 Greene, ME (g)
 251
 940
 
 1,191
 82
 3/25/2015 2014
 Greenwood, WI (g)
 154
 920
 
 1,074
 85
 6/27/2014 2013
 Hawkins, TX (g)
 49
 1,288
 
 1,337
 113
 9/5/2014 2014
 Hempstead, TX (g)
 219
 943
 
 1,162
 74
 12/18/2014 2014
 Hettinger, ND (g)
 214
 1,077
 
 1,291
 118
 2/26/2014 2013
 Hodgenville, KY (g)
 202
 783
 
 985
 70
 9/19/2014 2014
 Holtville, CA (g)
 317
 1,609
 
 1,926
 163
 2/19/2014 2013
 Homestead, FL (g)
 325
 1,001
 
 1,326
 81
 12/12/2014 2014
 Homosassa, FL (g)
 575
 1,470
 
 2,045
 82
 12/9/2015 2014
 Immokalee, FL (g)
 458
 1,248
 
 1,706
 107
 11/4/2014 2014
 Indio, CA (g)
 393
 1,636
 
 2,029
 151
 6/25/2014 2014
 Irvington, AL (g)
 217
 814
 
 1,031
 90
 12/27/2013 2013
 Jacksonville, FL 
 134
 1,157
 
 1,291
 95
 11/7/2014 2014

S-10

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Take 5 (continued):
Burleson, TX$— $201 $837 $$1,038 $12/21/20202010
Burleson, TX— 394 407 801 12/21/20202003
Cedar Hill, TX— 250 705 955 12/21/20201985
Hereford, TX— 50 995 1,045 12/21/20201993
Irving, TX— 120 445 565 12/21/20201989
Irving, TX— 210 818 1,028 12/21/20201987
Lubbock, TX— 151 1,428 1,579 12/21/20202002
Midland, TX— 192 1,861 2,053 12/21/20201995
Mineral Wells, TX— 131 1,263 1,394 12/21/20202019
Target Center:
Columbia, SC(h)3,234 7,297 (651)9,880 394 3/31/20142012
Terrell Mill Village:
Marieta, GA(h)3,079 11,185 14 14,278 2,205 1/31/20142012
TGI Friday's:
Cheseapeake, VA(h)1,217 1,388 2,605 242 6/27/20142003
Wilmington, DE(h)1,685 969 2,654 172 6/27/20141991
The Center at Hobbs Brook:
Sturbridge, MA21,500 11,241 29,152 1,502 41,895 4,655 6/29/20161999
The Market at Clifty Crossing:
Columbus, IN(h)2,669 16,308 113 19,090 4,509 10/31/20141989
The Market at Polaris:
Columbus, OH(h)11,828 41,702 (36,715)16,815 284 12/6/20132005
The Marquis:
Williamsburg, VA8,556 2,615 11,406 14,021 2,609 9/21/20122007
The Plant:
San Jose, CA123,000 67,596 108,203 583 176,382 24,218 4/15/20132008
The Ridge at Turtle Creek:
Hattiesburg, MS9,900 2,749 12,434 (3,482)11,701 267 2/27/20152011
Tire Kingdom:
Bluffton, SC(h)645 1,688 2,333 235 9/1/20152005
Summerville, SC(h)1,208 1,233 2,441 178 9/1/20152005
Tire Kingdom & Starbucks:
Mount Pleasant, SC2,400 1,291 3,149 (502)3,938 154 9/1/20152005
Tractor Supply:
Ashland, VA(h)500 2,696 3,196 510 11/22/20132013
Augusta, KS(h)407 2,315 2,722 430 1/10/20142013
Blytheville, AR— 780 2,660 3,440 12/21/20202002
Cambridge, MN(h)807 1,272 28 2,107 339 5/14/20122012
Canon City, CO(h)597 2,527 3,124 513 11/30/20122012
Carlyle, IL— 707 2,386 3,093 12/21/20202015
Fortuna, CA(h)568 3,819 4,387 675 6/27/20142014
Logan, WV— 597 3,232 3,829 12/21/20202006
Lumberton, NC(h)611 2,007 2,618 438 5/24/20132013
Marion, IN(h)1,536 1,099 2,635 216 2/19/20142004
Midland, NC— 865 2,182 3,047 12/21/20202013
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Family Dollar (continued):               
 Jay, FL (g)
 $190
 $1,002
 $
 $1,192
 $110
 2/25/2014 2013
 Jonesboro, GA (g)
 297
 1,098
 
 1,395
 114
 2/14/2014 2013
 Keller, TX (g)
 749
 1,550
 
 2,299
 151
 4/14/2014 2014
 Kersey, CO (g)
 238
 904
 
 1,142
 88
 5/29/2014 2014
 Kiowa, OK (g)
 193
 947
 
 1,140
 85
 9/5/2014 2014
 Kissimmee, FL (g)
 622
 1,226
 
 1,848
 112
 8/27/2014 2014
 La Salle, CO (g)
 239
 890
 
 1,129
 75
 11/4/2014 2013
 LaBelle, FL (g)
 268
 1,037
 
 1,305
 112
 2/28/2014 2014
 Lake Elsinor, CA (g)
 417
 1,682
 
 2,099
 166
 3/3/2014 2013
 Lakeland, FL (g)
 353
 937
 
 1,290
 90
 6/30/2014 2014
 Laredo, TX (g)
 302
 1,039
 
 1,341
 89
 10/3/2014 2013
 Levelland, TX (g)
 264
 952
 
 1,216
 84
 9/30/2014 2014
 Little Rock, CA (g)
 499
 1,730
 
 2,229
 131
 2/19/2015 2014
 Lorain, OH (g)
 320
 995
 
 1,315
 95
 6/27/2014 2014
 Louisville, KY (g)
 578
 919
 
 1,497
 94
 3/26/2014 2013
 Louisville, KY (g)
 480
 934
 
 1,414
 89
 6/4/2014 2014
 Mansfield, TX (g)
 849
 1,189
 
 2,038
 123
 2/26/2014 2013
 Melbourne, FL (g)
 362
 883
 
 1,245
 92
 2/28/2014 2014
 Melrose, FL (g)
 124
 929
 
 1,053
 81
 9/10/2014 2014
 Mertzon, TX (g)
 149
 995
 
 1,144
 95
 9/19/2014 2014
 Mesa, AZ (g)
 627
 1,468
 
 2,095
 142
 3/31/2014 2014
 Miami, FL (g)
 584
 1,490
 
 2,074
 107
 2/25/2015 2014
 Milo, ME (g)
 138
 1,122
 
 1,260
 96
 3/19/2015 2014
 Monroe, UT $
 272
 985
 
 1,257
 84
 10/24/2014 2013
 Moore Haven, FL (g)
 348
 1,016
 
 1,364
 103
 5/29/2014 2014
 Moulton, TX (g)
 102
 973
 
 1,075
 108
 2/26/2014 2014
 Naubinway, MI (g)
 47
 1,180
 
 1,227
 114
 2/4/2014 2013
 New Summerfield, TX (g)
 230
 851
 
 1,081
 81
 6/6/2014 2014
 Nicholasville, KY (g)
 464
 826
 
 1,290
 85
 3/26/2014 2013
 North Charleston, SC 
 386
 997
 
 1,383
 83
 11/14/2014 2014
 Omaha, NE (g)
 86
 1,427
 
 1,513
 105
 3/2/2015 2014
 Ordway, CO (g)
 81
 993
 
 1,074
 86
 10/30/2014 2014
 Oshkosh, WI (g)
 361
 815
 
 1,176
 85
 2/25/2014 2013
 Ossineke, MI (g)
 85
 898
 
 983
 85
 3/14/2014 2014
 Palmdale, CA (g)
 372
 1,822
 
 2,194
 132
 3/30/2015 2014
 Penitas, TX (g)
 182
 1,053
 
 1,235
 107
 3/26/2014 2014
 Pensacola, FL (g)
 509
 791
 
 1,300
 82
 3/27/2014 2014
 Pine Lake, GA (g)
 639
 897
 
 1,536
 83
 8/26/2014 2014
 Pittsfield, ME (g)
 334
 1,258
 
 1,592
 92
 8/12/2015 2014
 Plainview, NE (g)
 112
 774
 
 886
 79
 4/25/2014 2014
 Poinciana, FL (g)
 501
 1,186
 
 1,687
 104
 9/19/2014 2014
 Pojoaque, NM (g)
 545
 909
 41
 1,495
 80
 8/25/2014 2013
 Posen, MI (g)
 101
 896
 
 997
 85
 3/14/2014 2014
 Preston, MN (g)
 161
 1,159
 
 1,320
 115
 6/27/2014 2014

S-11

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Tractor Supply (continued):
Monticello, FL(h)$448 $1,916 $$2,364 $415 6/20/20132013
Shelbyville, IL$— 586 2,576 3,162 12/21/20202017
South Hill, VA(h)630 2,179 2,809 445 6/24/20132011
Weaverville, NC(h)867 3,138 4,005 624 9/13/20132006
Woodward, OK(h)446 1,973 2,419 402 11/19/20132013
Trader Joe's:
Asheville, NC(h)2,770 3,766 6,536 744 10/22/20132013
Columbia, SC(h)2,308 2,597 4,905 594 3/28/20132012
Wilmington, NC(h)2,016 2,519 4,535 630 6/27/20132012
Turfway Crossing:
Florence, KY8,280 2,261 10,323 418 13,002 2,180 5/27/20142002
Ulta Salon:
Albany, GA(h)441 1,757 2,198 313 5/8/20142013
Greeley, CO(h)596 2,035 2,631 315 3/31/20152014
United Oil:
Bellflower, CA(h)1,246 788 2,034 125 9/30/20142001
Brea, CA(h)2,393 658 3,051 104 9/30/20141984
Carson, CA— 2,354 4,821 7,175 12/21/20201958
El Cajon, CA(h)1,533 568 2,101 90 9/30/20142008
El Cajon, CA(h)1,225 368 1,593 58 9/30/20142000
El Monte, CA(h)766 510 1,276 80 9/30/20141994
Escondido, CA(h)3,514 1,062 4,576 168 9/30/20142002
Fallbrook, CA— 1,266 3,458 4,724 12/21/20201958
Glendale, CA(h)4,871 795 5,666 126 9/30/20141999
Harbor City, CA— 1,359 3,047 4,406 12/21/20202014
Hawthorne, CA— 896 1,764 2,660 12/21/20202001
Inglewood, CA(h)1,809 878 2,687 139 9/30/20141997
La Habra, CA(h)1,971 571 2,542 90 9/30/20142000
Lakewood, CA— 2,499 2,400 4,899 12/21/20201973
Lawndale, CA(h)1,462 862 2,324 136 9/30/20142001
Long Beach, CA— 1,088 2,582 3,670 12/21/20201990
Long Beach, CA(h)2,778 883 3,661 140 9/30/20141972
Los Angeles, CA(h)2,334 717 3,051 113 9/30/20142002
Los Angeles, CA(h)3,552 1,242 4,794 196 9/30/20142002
Los Angeles, CA(h)2,745 669 3,414 106 9/30/20141998
Los Angeles, CA(h)3,930 428 4,358 68 9/30/20142005
Los Angeles, CA(h)1,927 1,484 3,411 235 9/30/20142007
Los Angeles, CA(h)2,182 701 2,883 111 9/30/20141964
Los Angeles, CA— 2,435 2,614 5,049 12/21/20201982
Los Angeles, CA— 2,016 3,486 5,502 12/21/20201965
Madera, CA(h)1,500 3,804 5,304 265 9/27/20192018
Norco, CA(h)1,852 1,489 3,341 235 9/30/20141995
Poway, CA(h)3,072 705 3,777 111 9/30/20141960
San Clemente, CA— 2,036 3,561 5,597 12/21/20201973
San Diego, CA— 1,362 1,662 3,024 12/21/20201959
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Family Dollar (continued):               
 Punta Gorda, FL (g)
 $345
 $1,018
 $
 $1,363
 $55
 12/17/2015 2014
 Radium Springs, NM (g)
 129
 1,086
 
 1,215
 112
 2/26/2014 2013
 Ramah, NM (g)
 217
 1,105
 
 1,322
 107
 2/4/2014 2013
 Rex, GA $
 294
 1,393
 
 1,687
 114
 11/7/2014 2014
 Richmond, ME (g)
 252
 1,026
 
 1,278
 88
 3/25/2015 2014
 Riverside, CA (g)
 736
 1,558
 
 2,294
 151
 4/4/2014 2014
 Robert Lee, TX (g)
 94
 904
 
 998
 94
 2/26/2014 2014
 Rushford, MN (g)
 163
 844
 
 1,007
 87
 6/27/2014 2014
 Saginaw, MI (g)
 240
 956
 
 1,196
 83
 10/30/2014 2014
 San Antonio, TX (g)
 357
 966
 
 1,323
 91
 9/30/2014 2014
 San Antonio, TX 
 421
 951
 
 1,372
 86
 11/14/2014 2014
 San Jacinto, CA (g)
 430
 1,682
 
 2,112
 152
 7/18/2014 2014
 Schuyler, NE (g)
 260
 708
 
 968
 71
 5/5/2014 2014
 Shreveport, LA (g)
 406
 978
 
 1,384
 95
 5/29/2014 2014
 Shreveport, LA (g)
 272
 1,113
 
 1,385
 103
 7/22/2014 2014
 Shreveport, LA (g)
 423
 1,099
 
 1,522
 93
 10/8/2014 2014
 South Paris, ME (g)
 173
 1,240
 
 1,413
 107
 2/25/2015 2014
 Spring Hill, FL (g)
 278
 1,249
 
 1,527
 67
 12/4/2015 2015
 Spurger, TX (g)
 86
 905
 
 991
 81
 9/18/2014 2014
 Statesboro, GA (g)
 347
 800
 
 1,147
 85
 2/14/2014 2013
 Sterling City, TX (g)
 78
 889
 
 967
 93
 2/26/2014 2013
 Stockton, CA (g)
 202
 1,817
 
 2,019
 156
 9/19/2014 2014
 Taft, CA (g)
 255
 1,422
 
 1,677
 163
 8/23/2013 2013
 Tampa, FL (g)
 563
 737
 
 1,300
 81
 12/18/2013 2013
 Tampa, FL (g)
 482
 920
 
 1,402
 100
 12/18/2013 2013
 Tampa, FL (g)
 568
 1,137
 
 1,705
 109
 7/2/2014 2014
 Terra Bella, CA (g)
 332
 1,394
 
 1,726
 142
 2/19/2014 2013
 Topeka, KS (g)
 419
 1,327
 
 1,746
 130
 4/17/2014 2014
 Tucson, AZ (g)
 399
 1,599
 
 1,998
 124
 1/27/2015 2014
 Tyler, MN (g)
 73
 895
 
 968
 91
 6/27/2014 2014
 Tuscaloosa, AL (g)
 534
 817
 
 1,351
 90
 12/27/2013 2013
 Valdosta, GA (g)
 424
 849
 
 1,273
 89
 2/26/2014 2014
 Vine Grove, KY (g)
 205
 966
 
 1,171
 75
 2/13/2015 2014
 Waelder, TX (g)
 136
 788
 
 924
 76
 6/4/2014 2014
 Waldoboro, ME (g)
 211
 1,123
 
 1,334
 68
 1/13/2016 2015
 Walker, LA (g)
 294
 966
 
 1,260
 85
 9/30/2014 2014
 Wayne, OK (g)
 37
 937
 
 974
 90
 6/27/2014 2014
 Waynesburg, KY (g)
 150
 955
 
 1,105
 82
 10/10/2014 2014
 Wild Rose, WI (g)
 133
 866
 
 999
 80
 6/27/2014 2013
Fargo Plaza:                
 Fargo, ND (g)
 2,097
 4,774
 376
 7,247
 732
 5/30/2013 2003
Fleet Pride:                
 Birmingham, AL (g)
 376
 2,607
 
 2,983
 219
 8/3/2015 2014

S-12

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
United Oil (continued):
San Diego, CA$— $1,547 $3,218 $$4,765 $12/21/20202011
San Diego, CA— 2,409 4,105 6,514 12/21/20201976
San Diego, CA(h)2,977 1,448 4,425 229 9/30/20141984
San Diego, CA(h)1,877 883 2,760 139 9/30/20142006
San Diego, CA(h)1,824 382 2,206 61 9/30/20142006
Santa Ana, CA— 1,629 1,767 3,396 12/21/20202000
Santa Clarita, CA(h)4,787 733 5,520 116 9/30/20142001
Sun City, CA(h)1,136 1,421 2,557 224 9/30/20141984
Vista, CA(h)2,063 334 2,397 53 9/30/20141986
Vista (Vista), CA(h)2,028 418 2,446 66 9/30/20142010
Whittier, CA(h)1,629 985 2,614 156 9/30/20141997
University Marketplace:
Marion, IN(h)850 6,722 121 7,693 1,831 3/22/20132012
Urban Air Adventure Park:
Waukesha, WI(h)3,408 12,918 666 16,992 2,057 9/29/20142007
Vacant:
Appleton, WI(h)895 1,026 (1,194)727 11/18/20152015
Cherokee, IA(h)217 3,326 (2,654)889 11 12/23/20152015
Cokato, MN(h)358 3,229 (2,280)1,307 12/23/20152015
Danville, VA(h)274 1,514 (1,062)726 36 4/29/20142014
Dickson City, PA— 1,113 7,946 (7,817)1,242 221 6/30/20142013
Eldersburg, MD(h)557 876 1,433 102 4/28/20172000
Lancaster, TX(h)1,203 1,620 2,823 361 10/23/20122011
Nampa, ID(h)449 2,213 (1,482)1,180 36 3/31/20141972
Raleigh, NC— 329 556 885 12/21/20202014
Sanford, FL(h)1,031 1,807 (1,861)977 14 10/23/20121999
Troy, OH(h)992 1,577 (1,383)1,186 88 10/23/20122011
Valentine, NE(h)395 3,549 (2,403)1,541 57 6/30/20142014
Walker, LA(h)900 3,909 4,809 657 6/27/20141999
Ventura Place:
Albuquerque, NM(h)5,203 7,998 (5,050)8,151 196 4/29/20152008
Vitamin Shoppe:
Taylor, MI— 631 767 1,398 12/21/20201995
Wal-Mart:
Anderson, SC(h)2,424 9,719 12,143 1,251 11/5/20152015
Florence, SC(h)2,013 9,225 11,238 1,182 11/5/20152015
Perry, GA(h)2,270 11,053 13,323 2,364 6/4/20131999
Summerville, SC4,300 2,410 2,098 4,508 309 9/18/20152015
Tallahassee, FL(h)14,823 14,823 12/11/20122008
York, SC(h)1,913 11,410 13,323 2,425 6/4/20131998
Walgreens:
Austintown, OH(h)637 4,173 4,810 779 8/19/20132002
Baton Rouge, LA— 1,015 4,671 5,686 12/21/20202006
Chicopee, MA(h)2,094 4,945 7,039 772 10/23/20142008
Clinton, MI4,209 1,977 4,232 6,209 12/21/20201997
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Flower Foods:                
 Orlando, FL (g)
 $418
 $387
 $
 $805
 $34
 9/11/2014 2013
 Waldorf, MD (g)
 398
 1,045
 
 1,443
 102
 9/11/2014 2013
Food 4 Less:                
 Atwater, CA (g)
 1,383
 5,271
 
 6,654
 619
 11/27/2013 2002
Fountain Square:                
 Brookfield, WI $
 6,508
 28,634
 
 35,142
 894
 1/17/2017 2006
Fourth Creek Landing:                
 Statesville, NC 5,700
 1,375
 7,795
 
 9,170
 1,277
 3/26/2013 2012
Fresenius Medical Care:                
 West Plains, MI (g)
 557
 3,097
 
 3,654
 278
 7/2/2014 2014
Fresh Market Center:                
 Glen Ellyn, IL 4,750
 2,767
 6,403
 102
 9,272
 592
 9/30/2014 2014
Fresh Thyme:                
 Indianapolis, IN (g)
 1,087
 6,019
 
 7,106
 563
 10/31/2014 2014
 Northville, MI (g)
 1,598
 7,796
 
 9,394
 443
 12/21/2015 2015
Fresh Thyme & DSW:                
 Fort Wayne, IN 
 1,740
 4,153
 218
 6,111
 415
 9/30/2014 1985
Gabe’s Hobby Lobby:                
 Harrisonburg, VA (g)
 2,796
 7,637
 
 10,433
 308
 9/19/2016 1972
Giant Eagle:                
 Seven Fields, PA 7,530
 1,574
 13,659
 
 15,233
 1,283
 5/7/2014 2005
Gold's Gym:                
 Corpus Christi, TX (g)
 1,498
 6,346
 
 7,844
 824
 3/6/2013 2006
Golden Corral:                
 Garland, TX (g)
 1,255
 2,435
 
 3,690
 349
 9/21/2012 2012
 Houston, TX (g)
 1,375
 2,350
 
 3,725
 324
 12/12/2012 2012
 Victoria, TX (g)
 673
 2,857
 
 3,530
 258
 6/27/2014 2013
Goodyear:                
 Pooler, GA (g)
 569
 1,484
 
 2,053
 195
 6/18/2013 2008
Hancock Village:                
 Chesterfield, VA 15,000
 8,874
 17,287
 131
 26,292
 2,526
 5/23/2013 2009
Harbor Town Center:                
 Manitowoc, WI 9,750
 3,568
 13,209
 
 16,777
 1,105
 4/24/2015 2005
Harps Foods:                
 Gentry, AR 
 224
 2,680
 
 2,904
 18
 10/12/2017 1994
 Green Forest, AR 
 96
 3,163
 
 3,259
 4
 12/14/2017 2017
 Lincoln, AR 
 329
 3,668
 
 3,997
 50
 7/6/2017 2017
 Noel, MO 
 78
 885
 
 963
 8
 9/7/2017 2014
 Pocahontas, AR 
 557
 3,379
 
 3,936
 72
 4/13/2017 2016
 Vilonia, AR 
 406
 4,028
 
 4,434
 90
 3/20/2017 2016
Haverty Furniture:                
 Midland, TX (g)
 709
 1,294
 
 2,003
 228
 8/7/2013 2012
HEB Center:                
 Waxahachie, TX 7,000
 3,465
 7,952
 273
 11,690
 1,194
 6/27/2012 1997

S-13

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
Walgreens (continued):
Connelly Springs, NC(h)$1,349 $3,628 $$4,977 $694 8/27/20132012
Danville, VA(h)989 4,547 5,536 979 12/24/20122012
Dearborn Heights, MI(h)2,236 3,411 5,647 657 7/9/20132008
East Chicago, IN(h)331 5,242 5,573 839 8/8/20142005
Fort Madison, IA(h)514 3,723 4,237 700 9/20/20132008
Greenville, OH$— 542 4,063 4,605 12/21/20202014
Harrison, AR4,750 1,237 5,424 6,661 12/21/20202007
Hickory, NC(h)1,100 4,241 5,341 867 2/28/20132009
Huntsville, AL3,273 1,931 2,457 97 4,485 533 3/15/20132001
Indianapolis, IN4,602 1,212 5,484 6,696 12/21/20201996
Kannapolis, NC(h)1,480 5,031 6,511 976 6/12/20132012
Kilgore, TX— 821 5,601 6,422 12/21/20202007
Kokomo, IN— 12/21/20202014
Las Vegas, NV(h)2,325 3,262 70 5,657 622 9/26/20131999
Lawton, OK(h)860 2,539 106 3,505 494 7/3/20131998
Lees Summit, MO4,184 1,205 4,884 6,089 12/21/20202014
Little Rock, AR(h)548 4,676 5,224 768 6/30/20142011
Lubbock, TX(h)565 3,257 103 3,925 689 10/11/20122000
Lubbock, TX(h)531 2,951 102 3,584 620 10/11/20121998
Metropolis, IL(h)284 4,991 5,275 798 8/8/20142009
Mobile, AL(h)1,603 3,161 4,764 591 11/7/20132013
Pine Bluff, AR(h)248 5,229 5,477 982 9/17/20132012
Richmond, IN— 965 4,685 5,650 12/21/20202006
Sacramento, CA(h)324 2,669 2,993 458 6/30/20142008
San Antonio, TX— 1,417 7,932 9,349 12/21/20202005
Siloam Springs, AR3,839 936 4,367 5,303 12/21/20201999
Slidell, LA3,027 757 3,557 4,314 12/21/20202000
Springfield, IL(h)830 3,619 4,449 803 5/14/20122007
Suffolk, VA(h)1,261 3,461 4,722 807 5/14/20122007
Sun City, AZ(h)837 2,484 245 3,566 455 5/6/20142000
Tarboro, NC(h)755 3,634 4,389 594 8/22/20142014
Whiteville, NC— 829 4,090 4,919 12/21/20202007
Walgreens/KeyBank:
Newburgh, NY5,000 3,280 5,441 8,721 992 9/16/20132010
Wallace Commons:
Salisbury, NC7,590 3,265 8,058 11,323 1,674 12/21/20122009
Wallace Commons II:
Salisbury, NC(h)2,231 8,479 10,710 1,639 2/28/20142013
Waterford South Park:
Clarksville, IN7,200 2,946 8,564 45 11,555 2,075 4/12/20132006
Wendy's:
Grafton, VA(h)539 894 1,433 153 6/27/20141985
Westminster, CO(h)596 1,108 1,704 189 6/27/20141986
Western Crossing:
Jacksonville, NC— 3,382 7,775 11,157 12 12/21/20201995
                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Hickory Flat Commons:                
 Canton, GA $9,850
 $4,482
 $13,174
 $111
 $17,767
 $1,860
 12/18/2012 2008
Hobby Lobby:                
 Burlington, IA (g)
 629
 1,890
 
 2,519
 125
 7/30/2015 1988
 Dickson City, PA 
 1,113
 7,946
 
 9,059
 1,080
 6/30/2014 2013
 Lewisville, TX (g)
 2,184
 8,977
 
 11,161
 1,018
 11/26/2013 2013
 Mooresville, NC (g)
 869
 4,249
 
 5,118
 759
 11/30/2012 2012
Home Depot:                
 Lincoln, NE (g)
 6,339
 5,937
 
 12,276
 353
 10/22/2015 1993
 North Canton, OH 7,234
 2,203
 12,012
 
 14,215
 1,634
 12/20/2012 1998
 Plainwell, MI (g)
 521
 11,905
 
 12,426
 1,402
 5/16/2013 2002
IHOP:                
 Anderson, IN (g)
 54
 1,633
 
 1,687
 146
 6/30/2014 2005
 Rio Rancho, NM (g)
 599
 2,314
 
 2,913
 219
 3/28/2014 2011
Inglewood Plaza:                
 Inglewood, CA 12,700
 9,880
 14,099
 
 23,979
 1,256
 9/12/2014 2008
Kirklands:                
 Dothan, AL (g)
 486
 946
 
 1,432
 112
 8/5/2014 2014
 Jonesboro, AR (g)
 696
 1,990
 
 2,686
 255
 11/27/2012 2012
Kohl’s:                
 Cedar Falls, IA (g)
 1,600
 5,796
 
 7,396
 792
 12/7/2012 2001
 Chartlottesville, VA 8,745
 3,929
 12,280
 
 16,209
 1,102
 7/28/2014 2011
 Easton, MD (g)
 2,962
 2,661
 
 5,623
 136
 12/2/2015 1992
 Hutchinson, KS (g)
 3,290
 
 
 3,290
 
 10/19/2012 2012
Kroger:                
 Shelton, WA (g)
 1,180
 11,040
 
 12,220
 1,189
 4/30/2014 1994
 Whitehall, OH 4,066
 581
 6,628
 224
 7,433
 775
 12/16/2013 1994
Kum & Go:                
 Bentonville, AR (g)
 916
 1,864
 
 2,780
 227
 5/3/2013 2011
 Conway, AR (g)
 510
 2,577
 
 3,087
 232
 6/13/2014 2014
 Fairfield, IA (g)
 422
 1,913
 
 2,335
 234
 5/3/2013 2011
 Mount Vernon, MO (g)
 708
 1,756
 
 2,464
 215
 5/3/2013 2010
 Urbandale, IA (g)
 722
 1,658
 
 2,380
 204
 5/3/2013 2010
LA Fitness:                
 Bloomfield Township, MI (g)
 2,287
 10,075
 
 12,362
 1,289
 6/21/2013 2008
 Columbus, OH (g)
 1,013
 6,734
 
 7,747
 502
 4/29/2015 2014
 Garland, TX (g)
 2,005
 6,861
 
 8,866
 727
 12/20/2013 2013
 Houston, TX (g)
 5,764
 5,994
 
 11,758
 683
 9/30/2013 2013
 Mesa, AZ (g)
 1,353
 7,730
 20
 9,103
 1,004
 5/8/2013 2010
 New Lenox, IL (g)
 1,965
 6,257
 
 8,222
 333
 12/21/2015 2015
 Ocoee, FL (g)
 1,173
 6,876
 5
 8,054
 835
 8/8/2013 2008
 Riverside, CA (g)
 2,557
 9,951
 
 12,508
 1,172
 8/2/2013 2010
Lafayette Pavilions:                
 Lafayette, IN (g)
 7,632
 42,497
 5,129
 55,258
 3,971
 2/6/2015 2006

S-14

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTYCIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
(in thousands)

Initial Costs to CompanyGross Amount at
Buildings,TotalWhich CarriedAccumulated
Fixtures andAdjustmentAt December 31, 2020DepreciationDateDate
Description (a)EncumbrancesLandImprovementsto Basis (b)(c) (d) (e)(e) (f) (g)AcquiredConstructed
West Marine:
Chicago, IL$— $4,442 $8,698 $$13,140 $10 12/21/20202005
Panama City, FL(h)676 2,219 2,895 399 4/24/20152014
Pensacola, FL(h)1,107 3,398 4,505 595 2/27/20152015
Westover Market:
San Antonio, TX(h)2,705 7,959 (6,264)4,400 159 7/10/20132013
Winn-Dixie:
Amite, LA— 1,479 1,691 3,170 12/21/20202000
$578,096 $901,859 $2,533,704 $(63,637)$3,371,926 $298,364 

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Logan’s Roadhouse:                
 Bristol, VA (g)
 $991
 $2,560
 $
 $3,551
 $353
 1/29/2013 2001
 Fort Wayne, IN (g)
 868
 2,698
 
 3,566
 256
 3/28/2014 2002
 Lancaster, TX (g)
 1,203
 1,620
 
 2,823
 229
 10/23/2012 2011
 Martinsburg, WV (g)
 925
 2,183
 
 3,108
 234
 10/29/2013 2010
 Opelika, AL (g)
 836
 1,508
 
 2,344
 216
 10/23/2012 2005
 Sanford, FL (g)
 1,031
 1,807
 
 2,838
 257
 10/23/2012 1999
 Troy, OH (g)
 992
 1,577
 (1,383) 1,186
 25
 10/23/2012 2011
Lord Salisbury Center:                
 Salisbury, MD (g)
 6,949
 12,179
 
 19,128
 933
 3/11/2016 2005
Lowe’s:                
 Adrian, MI (g)
 2,604
 5,036
 
 7,640
 747
 9/27/2013 1996
 Alpharetta, GA $12,300
 7,979
 9,630
 403
 18,012
 738
 5/29/2015 1998
 Asheboro, NC (g)
 1,098
 6,722
 
 7,820
 642
 6/23/2014 1994
 Cincinnati, OH (g)
 14,092
 
 
 14,092
 
 2/10/2014 2001
 Columbia, SC 5,964
 3,943
 6,353
 750
 11,046
 854
 9/12/2013 1994
 Covington, LA 5,648
 10,233
 
 
 10,233
 
 8/20/2014 2002
 Hilliard, OH 7,859
 5,474
 6,288
 
 11,762
 478
 8/5/2015 1994
 Lilburn, GA 12,500
 8,817
 9,380
 385
 18,582
 716
 5/29/2015 1999
 Mansfield, OH (g)
 873
 8,256
 
 9,129
 805
 6/12/2014 1992
 Marietta, GA 11,000
 7,471
 8,404
 392
 16,267
 650
 5/29/2015 1997
 Oxford, AL (g)
 1,668
 7,622
 369
 9,659
 1,084
 6/28/2013 1999
 Tuscaloosa, AL (g)
 4,908
 4,786
 18
 9,712
 575
 10/29/2013 1993
 Woodstock, GA 11,200
 7,316
 8,879
 392
 16,587
 686
 5/29/2015 1997
 Zanesville, OH (g)
 2,161
 8,375
 282
 10,818
 926
 12/11/2013 1995
Market Heights Shopping Center:                
 Harker Heights, TX 47,000
 12,888
 64,105
 504
 77,497
 8,293
 11/25/2013 2012
Marketplace at the Lakes:                
 West Covina, CA 11,300
 10,020
 8,664
 
 18,684
 1,949
 9/30/2013 1994
Matteson Center:                
 Matteson, IL 
 1,243
 17,427
 2,767
 21,437
 2,344
 11/22/2013 2003
Mattress Firm:                
 Appleton, WI (g)
 895
 1,026
 
 1,921
 66
 11/18/2015 2015
 Ashtabula, OH 
 301
 1,965
 
 2,266
 102
 3/23/2016 2015
 Augusta, ME (g)
 723
 1,354
 
 2,077
 153
 5/30/2014 2013
 Brunswick, GA (g)
 343
 1,040
 
 1,383
 128
 8/29/2013 2012
 Cincinnati, OH (g)
 323
 966
 
 1,289
 89
 7/17/2014 2013
 Danville, VA (g)
 274
 1,514
 
 1,788
 150
 4/29/2014 2014
 Huber Heights, OH (g)
 854
 903
 
 1,757
 86
 6/20/2014 2014
 Jonesboro, AR (g)
 729
 1,194
 
 1,923
 212
 10/5/2012 2012
 Lakeland, FL (g)
 259
 1,107
 
 1,366
 111
 7/16/2014 2014
 Martinsville, VA (g)
 259
 1,510
 
 1,769
 107
 9/17/2015 2014
 Middletown, OH (g)
 142
 1,384
 
 1,526
 90
 8/6/2015 2015
 Nampa, ID (g)
 449
 2,213
 
 2,662
 220
 3/31/2014 1972

S-15

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Mattress Firm (continued):                
 New Bern, NC (g)
 $340
 $1,436
 $
 $1,776
 $126
 9/25/2014 2014
 Pineville, NC (g)
 1,557
 1,198
 
 2,755
 189
 10/29/2012 2012
 Port Charlotte, FL (g)
 382
 1,211
 
 1,593
 110
 8/1/2014 2014
 Thomasville, GA (g)
 694
 1,469
 
 2,163
 79
 12/18/2015 2015
Mattress Firm & Aspen Dental:                
 Vienna, WV $
 774
 2,466
 
 3,240
 273
 9/15/2014 2014
Mattress Firm & Five Guys:                
 Muskegon, MI (g)
 813
 1,766
 
 2,579
 159
 8/29/2014 2014
McAlister’s Deli:                
 Lawton, OK (g)
 805
 1,057
 
 1,862
 106
 5/1/2014 2013
 Port Arthur, TX (g)
 379
 1,146
 
 1,525
 131
 3/27/2014 2007
McGowin Park:                
 Mobile, AL 42,765
 2,243
 69,357
 
 71,600
 1,565
 4/26/2017 2016
Melody Mountain:                
 Ashland, KY 7,376
 1,286
 9,879
 
 11,165
 606
 9/1/2015 2013
Men’s Wearhouse:                
 Ft. Wayne, IN (g)
 421
 2,125
 75
 2,621
 88
 8/19/2016 2005
Merchants Tire & Auto:                
 Wake Forest, NC (g)
 782
 1,730
 
 2,512
 104
 9/1/2015 2005
Michael’s:                
 Bowling Green, KY (g)
 587
 1,992
 
 2,579
 316
 11/20/2012 2012
Mister Car Wash:                
 Athens, AL 
 383
 1,150
 
 1,533
 7
 9/12/2017 2008
 Decatur, AL 
 257
 559
 
 816
 5
 9/12/2017 2005
 Decatur, AL 
 486
 1,253
 
 1,739
 11
 9/12/2017 2014
 Decatur, AL 
 359
 1,152
 
 1,511
 8
 9/12/2017 2007
 Hartselle, AL 
 360
 569
 
 929
 5
 9/12/2017 2007
 Madison, AL 
 562
 1,139
 
 1,701
 10
 9/12/2017 2012
Morganton Heights:                
 Morganton, NC 22,800
 7,032
 29,763
 
 36,795
 3,234
 4/29/2015 2013
National Tire & Battery:                
 Cedar Hill, TX (g)
 469
 1,951
 
 2,420
 252
 12/18/2012 2006
 Cypress, TX (g)
 910
 2,224
 
 3,134
 144
 9/1/2015 2005
 Flower Mound, TX (g)
 779
 2,449
 
 3,228
 152
 9/1/2015 2005
 Fort Worth, TX (g)
 936
 1,234
 
 2,170
 144
 8/23/2013 2005
 Fort Worth, TX 
 730
 2,309
 
 3,039
 143
 9/1/2015 2005
 Frisco, TX (g)
 844
 1,608
 
 2,452
 186
 8/23/2013 2007
 Montgomery, IL (g)
 516
 2,494
 
 3,010
 322
 1/15/2013 2007
 North Richland Hills, TX (g)
 513
 2,579
 
 3,092
 165
 9/1/2015 2005
 Pasadena, TX (g)
 908
 2,307
 
 3,215
 149
 9/1/2015 2005
 Pearland, TX (g)
 1,016
 2,040
 
 3,056
 129
 9/1/2015 2005
 Plano, TX (g)
 1,292
 2,197
 
 3,489
 139
 9/2/2015 2005
 Tomball, TX (g)
 838
 2,229
 
 3,067
 140
 9/2/2015 2005

S-16

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Native Wings:                
 San Antonio, TX (g)
 $821
 $2,682
 $
 $3,503
 $245
 8/4/2014 2014
Natural Grocers:                
 Denton, TX (g)
 1,326
 3,134
 
 4,460
 371
 7/24/2013 2012
 Idaho Falls, ID (g)
 833
 2,316
 
 3,149
 238
 2/14/2014 2013
 Lubbock, TX (g)
 1,093
 3,621
 
 4,714
 439
 4/22/2013 2013
Nordstrom Rack:                
 Tampa, FL $6,880
 3,371
 6,402
 
 9,773
 1,138
 4/16/2012 2010
North Logan Commons:                
 Loganville, GA 
 4,535
 11,826
 28
 16,389
 634
 9/22/2016 2009
Northwest Plaza:                
 Tampa, FL 
 1,816
 4,834
 254
 6,904
 358
 8/20/2015 1994
O’Reilly Auto Parts:                
 Brownfield, TX (g)
 22
 835
 
 857
 126
 5/8/2012 2012
 Clayton, GA (g)
 501
 945
 
 1,446
 48
 1/29/2016 2015
 Columbus, TX (g)
 260
 757
 
 1,017
 108
 5/8/2012 2011
 Lamesa, TX (g)
 64
 608
 
 672
 47
 12/10/2014 2006
 Stanley, ND (g)
 323
 662
 
 985
 57
 8/8/2014 2014
Owensboro Towne Center:                
 Owensboro, KY 14,027
 3,807
 16,259
 788
 20,854
 924
 1/12/2016 1996
Park Place:                
 Enterprise, AL 6,505
 931
 8,595
 
 9,526
 980
 8/30/2013 2012
Parkway Centre South:                
 Grove City, OH 14,250
 7,027
 18,223
 
 25,250
 928
 7/15/2016 2005
Pecanland Plaza:                
 Monroe, LA (g)
 2,206
 18,957
 
 21,163
 1,199
 10/13/2015 2008
Pep Boys:                
 Clermont, FL (g)
 799
 1,993
 
 2,792
 247
 6/26/2013 2013
 Oviedo, FL (g)
 669
 2,172
 
 2,841
 252
 10/4/2013 2013
PetSmart:                
 Baton Rouge, LA 2,509
 651
 2,968
 113
 3,732
 476
 10/11/2012 1999
 Commerce Township, MI (g)
 539
 1,960
 
 2,499
 319
 3/28/2013 1996
 East Peoria, IL (g)
 997
 3,345
 
 4,342
 284
 11/7/2014 2007
 Eden Prairie, MN (g)
 1,279
 2,030
 
 3,309
 247
 10/1/2013 2007
 Edmond, OK (g)
 816
 3,266
 
 4,082
 431
 1/23/2013 1998
 North Fayette Township, PA (g)
 1,615
 1,503
 
 3,118
 208
 6/7/2013 1997
 Overland Park, KS (g)
 2,025
 2,181
 
 4,206
 250
 10/1/2013 1996
 Taylor, MI (g)
 331
 2,438
 
 2,769
 374
 6/7/2013 1997
 Tucson, AZ (g)
 1,114
 2,771
 98
 3,983
 370
 11/8/2013 2000
 Wilkesboro, NC (g)
 447
 1,710
 
 2,157
 263
 4/13/2012 2011
PetSmart/Old Navy:                
 Reynoldsburg, OH 3,658
 1,295
 4,077
 
 5,372
 615
 12/14/2012 2012

S-17

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Pick ’n Save:                
 Pewaukee, WI (g)
 $1,323
 $6,761
 $
 $8,084
 $690
 8/13/2014 1999
 Sheboygan, WI (g)
 2,003
 10,695
 
 12,698
 1,494
 9/6/2012 2012
 South Milwaukee, WI (g)
 1,126
 5,706
 
 6,832
 612
 11/6/2013 2005
Plainfield Plaza:                
 Plainfield, IL (g)
 3,167
 14,788
 
 17,955
 870
 12/3/2015 2002
Plaza San Mateo:                
 Albuquerque, NM $6,950
 2,867
 11,582
 
 14,449
 1,136
 5/2/2014 2014
Popeyes:                
 Independence, MO (g)
 333
 680
 
 1,013
 62
 6/27/2014 2005
Poplar Springs Plaza:                
 Duncan, SC 5,000
 1,862
 5,277
 478
 7,617
 750
 5/24/2013 1995
Price Chopper:                
 Gardner, MA (g)
 858
 12,171
 
 13,029
 1,032
 9/26/2014 2012
Quick Chek:                
 Kingston, NY (g)
 831
 5,783
 
 6,614
 684
 5/31/2013 2008
 Lake Katrine, NY (g)
 1,507
 4,569
 
 6,076
 528
 5/31/2013 2008
 Middletown, NY (g)
 1,335
 5,732
 
 7,067
 677
 5/31/2013 2008
 Middletown, NY (g)
 1,297
 5,963
 
 7,260
 704
 5/31/2013 2009
 Middletown, NY (g)
 1,437
 4,656
 
 6,093
 554
 5/31/2013 2007
 Sagerties, NY (g)
 1,242
 5,372
 
 6,614
 636
 5/31/2013 2009
Raising Cane’s:                
 Beaumont, TX (g)
 839
 1,288
 
 2,127
 120
 7/31/2014 2013
 Phoenix, AZ (g)
 761
 1,972
 
 2,733
 187
 3/28/2014 2011
 Wichita Falls, TX (g)
 426
 1,947
 
 2,373
 183
 4/30/2014 2013
Regent Towne Center:                
 Fort Mill, SC (g)
 1,455
 5,063
 80
 6,598
 699
 6/13/2013 2007
Rite Aid:                
 Columbia, SC (g)
 854
 2,281
 
 3,135
 248
 12/3/2013 2008
 Jenison, MI (g)
 438
 1,491
 
 1,929
 150
 6/23/2014 1996
Rocky River Promenade:                
 Mooresville, NC 3,989
 2,446
 3,159
 
 5,605
 294
 8/18/2014 2008
Rolling Acres Plaza:                
 Lady Lake, FL 21,930
 7,540
 26,839
 
 34,379
 955
 9/1/2016 2005
Ross:                
 Fort Worth, TX (g)
 1,273
 3,157
 
 4,430
 466
 10/4/2012 1977
Rushmore Crossing:                
 Rapid City, SD 23,541
 7,066
 33,019
 189
 40,274
 4,524
 1/2/2014 2012
 Rapid City, SD (g)
 883
 4,128
 
 5,011
 623
 1/2/2014 2012
Sherwin-Williams:                
 Macon, GA (g)
 59
 659
 
 718
 47
 4/16/2015 2015
Shippensburg Market Place:                
 Shippensburg, PA (g)
 1,917
 9,263
 
 11,180
 849
 9/18/2014 2002

S-18

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Shopko:                
 Ballard, UT (g)
 $334
 $2,865
 $
 $3,199
 $138
 3/4/2016 2015
 Broken Bow, NE (g)
 244
 1,733
 
 1,977
 180
 6/19/2014 2007
 Cherokee, IA (g)
 217
 3,326
 
 3,543
 177
 12/23/2015 2015
 Cokato, MN (g)
 358
 3,229
 
 3,587
 186
 12/23/2015 2015
 Valentine, NE (g)
 395
 3,549
 
 3,944
 371
 6/30/2014 2014
 Webster City, IA (g)
 656
 2,868
 
 3,524
 141
 2/17/2016 2015
Shoppes at Lake Andrew:                
 Melbourne, FL (g)
 3,924
 16,840
 21
 20,785
 2,057
 12/31/2013 2003
Shoppes at Stroud:                
 Stroud Township, PA (g)
 3,754
 22,614
 32
 26,400
 2,150
 10/29/2014 2007
Sleepy’s:                
 Burlington, NC (g)
 393
 1,648
 
 2,041
 117
 3/31/2015 2014
 Joliet, IL (g)
 287
 1,552
 
 1,839
 113
 2/27/2015 2014
Southwest Plaza:                
 Springfield, IL (g)
 2,992
 48,935
 207
 52,134
 5,152
 9/18/2014 2003
Spinx:                
 Simpsonville, SC (g)
 591
 969
 
 1,560
 121
 1/24/2013 2012
Springfield Commons:                
 Springfield, OH $11,250
 3,745
 15,049
 106
 18,900
 1,187
 5/6/2015 1995
Sprouts:                
 Bixby, OK (g)
 1,320
 7,117
 
 8,437
 817
 7/26/2013 2013
Staples:                
 Plainfield, IN (g)
 400
 2,099
 
 2,499
 164
 2/26/2015 2014
Stoneridge Village:                
 Jefferson City, MO 6,500
 1,830
 9,351
 
 11,181
 1,035
 6/30/2014 2012
Stop & Shop:                
 Brockton, MA 11,241
 4,259
 13,285
 
 17,544
 1,057
 7/27/2015 2003
Stripes:                
 Brownsville, TX (g)
 210
 2,386
 
 2,596
 376
 8/30/2012 2007
 Brownwood, TX (g)
 484
 3,086
 
 3,570
 468
 8/30/2012 2005
 McAllen, TX (g)
 604
 1,909
 
 2,513
 349
 8/30/2012 2007
 Midland, TX (g)
 620
 5,551
 
 6,171
 779
 8/30/2012 2002
 Mission, TX (g)
 215
 2,170
 
 2,385
 342
 8/30/2012 2006
 Odessa, TX (g)
 569
 4,940
 
 5,509
 689
 8/30/2012 1998
Summerfield Crossing:                
 Riverview, FL 7,310
 6,130
 6,753
 
 12,883
 838
 7/12/2013 2013
Sunbelt Rentals:                
 Canton, OH (g)
 147
 1,679
 
 1,826
 242
 10/24/2013 2013
 Houston, TX (g)
 535
 1,664
 
 2,199
 160
 3/31/2014 2000
Sunoco:                
 Cocoa, FL (g)
 625
 1,062
 
 1,687
 126
 4/12/2013 1987
 Mangonia Park, FL (g)
 689
 600
 
 1,289
 71
 4/12/2013 1999
 Merritt Island, FL (g)
 610
 1,123
 
 1,733
 133
 4/12/2013 1986
 Palm Beach Gardens, FL (g)
 1,050
 2,667
 
 3,717
 315
 4/12/2013 2009

S-19

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Sunoco (continued):                
 Palm City, FL (g)
 $667
 $1,698
 $
 $2,365
 $201
 4/12/2013 2011
 Palm Springs, FL (g)
 580
 1,907
 
 2,487
 225
 4/12/2013 2011
 Sebastian, FL (g)
 490
 2,128
 
 2,618
 251
 4/12/2013 2009
 Titusville, FL (g)
 626
 2,534
 
 3,160
 299
 4/12/2013 2009
 West Palm Beach, FL (g)
 637
 443
 
 1,080
 53
 4/12/2013 1977
Sunoco Center:                
 Titusville, FL $
 799
 587
 
 1,386
 72
 4/12/2013 1986
Sutters Creek:                
 Rocky Mount, NC 
 1,458
 2,616
 268
 4,342
 337
 1/31/2014 2012
Target Center:                
 Columbia, SC 5,450
 3,234
 7,297
 
 10,531
 757
 3/31/2014 2012
Terrell Mill Village:                
 Marietta, GA 7,500
 3,079
 11,185
 
 14,264
 1,295
 1/31/2014 2012
TGI Friday’s:                
 Chesapeake, VA (g)
 1,217
 1,388
 
 2,605
 131
 6/27/2014 2003
 Wilmington, DE (g)
 1,685
 969
 
 2,654
 93
 6/27/2014 1991
The Center at Hobbs Brook:              
 Sturbridge, MA 21,500
 11,241
 29,152
 915
 41,308
 1,583
 6/29/2016 1999
The Market at Clifty Crossing:              
 Columbus, IN (g)
 2,669
 16,308
 65
 19,042
 2,704
 10/31/2014 1989
The Market at Polaris:                
 Columbus, OH (g)
 11,828
 41,702
 508
 54,038
 4,722
 12/6/2013 2005
The Marquis:                
 Williamsburg, VA 8,556
 2,615
 11,406
 
 14,021
 1,665
 9/21/2012 2007
The Plant:                
 San Jose, CA 123,000
 67,596
 108,203
 382
 176,181
 15,373
 4/15/2013 2008
The Ridge at Turtle Creek:              
 Hattiesburg, MS 9,900
 2,749
 12,434
 
 15,183
 962
 2/27/2015 2011
Tilted Kilt:                
 Killeen, TX (g)
 1,378
 1,508
 
 2,886
 135
 7/29/2014 2010
Tire Kingdom:                
 Bluffton, SC (g)
 645
 1,688
 
 2,333
 102
 9/1/2015 2005
 Summerville, SC (g)
 1,208
 1,233
 
 2,441
 77
 9/1/2015 2005
 Tarpon Springs, FL (g)
 427
 1,458
 
 1,885
 193
 11/30/2012 2003
Tire Kingdom & Starbucks:              
 Mount Pleasant, SC 2,400
 1,291
 3,149
 
 4,440
 192
 9/1/2015 2005
TJ Maxx/Dollar Tree:                
 Oxford, OH (g)
 641
 2,673
 90
 3,404
 419
 5/20/2013 2013
Tractor Supply:                
 Ashland, VA (g)
 500
 2,696
 
 3,196
 295
 11/22/2013 2013
 Augusta, KS (g)
 407
 2,315
 
 2,722
 244
 1/10/2014 2013
 Cambridge, MN (g)
 807
 1,272
 
 2,079
 220
 5/14/2012 2012
 Canon City, CO (g)
 597
 2,527
 
 3,124
 324
 11/30/2012 2012
 Fortuna, CA (g)
 568
 3,819
 
 4,387
 365
 6/27/2014 2014

S-20

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Tractor Supply (continued):                
 Lumberton, NC (g)
 $611
 $2,007
 $
 $2,618
 $266
 5/24/2013 2013
 Marion, IN (g)
 1,536
 1,099
 
 2,635
 124
 2/19/2014 2004
 Monticello, FL (g)
 448
 1,916
 
 2,364
 250
 6/20/2013 2013
 Newnan, GA (g)
 1,182
 1,950
 
 3,132
 272
 11/6/2012 2009
 Petersburg, VA (g)
 514
 2,439
 
 2,953
 273
 10/7/2013 2013
 South Hill, VA (g)
 630
 2,179
 
 2,809
 268
 6/24/2013 2011
 Spencer, WV $1,659
 455
 2,188
 
 2,643
 321
 11/20/2012 2012
 Stuttgart, AR 1,543
 47
 2,519
 
 2,566
 314
 4/5/2013 2013
 Weaverville, NC (g)
 867
 3,138
 
 4,005
 367
 9/13/2013 2006
 Woodward, OK (g)
 446
 1,973
 
 2,419
 233
 11/19/2013 2013
Trader Joe’s:                
 Asheville, NC (g)
 2,770
 3,766
 
 6,536
 435
 10/22/2013 2013
 Columbia, SC (g)
 2,308
 2,597
 
 4,905
 365
 3/28/2013 2012
 Wilmington, NC (g)
 2,016
 2,519
 
 4,535
 379
 6/27/2013 2012
Turfway Crossing:                
 Florence, KY 8,480
 2,261
 10,323
 409
 12,993
 1,191
 5/27/2014 2002
Ulta Salon:                
 Albany, GA (g)
 441
 1,757
 
 2,198
 171
 5/8/2014 2013
 Greeley, CO (g)
 596
 2,035
 
 2,631
 152
 3/31/2015 2014
United Oil:                
 Alhambra, CA 2,032
 3,026
 751
 
 3,777
 62
 9/30/2014 2005
 Bellflower, CA 755
 1,312
 576
 
 1,888
 48
 9/30/2014 1999
 Bellflower, CA (g)
 1,246
 788
 
 2,034
 65
 9/30/2014 2001
 Brea, CA (g)
 2,393
 658
 
 3,051
 54
 9/30/2014 1984
 Burbank, CA 2,193
 3,474
 594
 
 4,068
 49
 9/30/2014 2000
 Burbank, CA 1,484
 1,750
 574
 
 2,324
 47
 9/30/2014 1998
 Chino, CA 1,167
 1,449
 730
 
 2,179
 60
 9/30/2014 1984
 Compton, CA 805
 992
 460
 
 1,452
 38
 9/30/2014 2002
 El Cajon, CA (g)
 1,533
 568
 
 2,101
 47
 9/30/2014 2008
 El Cajon, CA (g)
 1,225
 368
 
 1,593
 30
 9/30/2014 2000
 El Monte, CA (g)
 766
 510
 
 1,276
 42
 9/30/2014 1994
 Escondido, CA 1,107
 678
 470
 
 1,148
 39
 9/30/2014 1984
 Escondido, CA (g)
 3,514
 1,062
 
 4,576
 88
 9/30/2014 2002
 Fountain Valley, CA 1,459
 1,809
 806
 
 2,615
 67
 9/30/2014 1999
 Glendale, CA (g)
 4,871
 795
 
 5,666
 66
 9/30/2014 1999
 Inglewood, CA (g)
 1,809
 878
 
 2,687
 73
 9/30/2014 1997
 La Habra, CA (g)
 1,971
 571
 
 2,542
 47
 9/30/2014 2000
 Lawndale, CA (g)
 1,462
 862
 
 2,324
 71
 9/30/2014 2001
 Long Beach, CA 1,061
 974
 772
 
 1,746
 64
 9/30/2014 2003
 Long Beach, CA (g)
 2,778
 883
 
 3,661
 73
 9/30/2014 1972
 Long Beach, CA 1,288
 1,972
 643
 
 2,615
 53
 9/30/2014 2004
 Los Angeles, CA (g)
 2,334
 717
 
 3,051
 59
 9/30/2014 2002
 Los Angeles, CA (g)
 3,552
 1,242
 
 4,794
 103
 9/30/2014 2002
 Los Angeles, CA (g)
 2,745
 669
 
 3,414
 55
 9/30/2014 1998

S-21

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
United Oil (continued):                
 Los Angeles, CA $2,923
 $3,823
 $825
 $
 $4,648
 $68
 9/30/2014 1997
 Los Angeles, CA (g)
 3,930
 428
 
 4,358
 35
 9/30/2014 2005
 Los Angeles, CA 1,590
 1,710
 905
 
 2,615
 75
 9/30/2014 2002
 Los Angeles, CA (g)
 1,927
 1,484
 
 3,411
 123
 9/30/2014 2007
 Los Angeles, CA (g)
 2,182
 701
 
 2,883
 58
 9/30/2014 1964
 Lynwood, CA 1,640
 2,386
 737
 
 3,123
 61
 9/30/2014 2002
 Menifee, CA 2,284
 2,853
 924
 
 3,777
 76
 9/30/2014 1995
 Monrovia, CA 1,660
 2,365
 686
 
 3,051
 57
 9/30/2014 1996
 Norco, CA (g)
 1,852
 1,489
 
 3,341
 123
 9/30/2014 1995
 Norco, CA 1,424
 1,869
 891
 
 2,760
 74
 9/30/2014 2005
 North Hollywood, CA 2,998
 4,663
 858
 
 5,521
 71
 9/30/2014 1999
 Oceanside, CA 2,264
 2,163
 1,248
 
 3,411
 103
 9/30/2014 2011
 Paramount, CA 664
 1,301
 1,024
 
 2,325
 85
 9/30/2014 1996
 Pomona, CA 1,273
 1,740
 730
 
 2,470
 60
 9/30/2014 1997
 Poway, CA (g)
 3,072
 705
 
 3,777
 58
 9/30/2014 1960
 San Diego, CA (g)
 2,977
 1,448
 
 4,425
 120
 9/30/2014 1984
 San Diego, CA (g)
 1,877
 883
 
 2,760
 73
 9/30/2014 2006
 San Diego, CA 3,038
 1,215
 841
 
 2,056
 69
 9/30/2014 2010
 San Diego, CA (g)
 1,824
 382
 
 2,206
 32
 9/30/2014 2006
 San Pedro, CA 1,655
 2,086
 675
 
 2,761
 56
 9/30/2014 2000
 Santa Clarita, CA (g)
 4,787
 733
 
 5,520
 60
 9/30/2014 2001
 Sun City, CA (g)
 1,136
 1,421
 
 2,557
 117
 9/30/2014 1984
 Valley Center, CA 2,284
 2,680
 1,606
 
 4,286
 132
 9/30/2014 2009
 Van Nuys, CA 2,284
 2,439
 902
 
 3,341
 75
 9/30/2014 2005
 Van Nuys, CA 1,152
 1,786
 684
 
 2,470
 56
 9/30/2014 1999
 Van Nuys, CA 2,681
 3,980
 741
 
 4,721
 61
 9/30/2014 2002
 Vista, CA (g)
 2,063
 334
 
 2,397
 28
 9/30/2014 1986
 Vista, CA (g)
 2,028
 418
 
 2,446
 35
 9/30/2014 2010
 Whittier, CA (g)
 1,629
 985
 
 2,614
 82
 9/30/2014 1997
 Wilmington, CA 1,680
 1,615
 1,145
 
 2,760
 95
 9/30/2014 2002
 Woodland Hills, CA 3,159
 4,946
 647
 
 5,593
 53
 9/30/2014 2003
University Marketplace:                
 Marion, IN 4,050
 850
 6,722
 121
 7,693
 1,107
 3/22/2013 2012
Vacant:                
 Georgetown, KY 
 1,048
 1,452
 (1,575) 925
 
 6/11/2014 2004
 Overland Park, KS 
 806
 3,600
 (3,256) 1,150
 
 3/28/2014 2001
 Pensacola, FL (g)
 2,152
 3,831
 
 5,983
 386
 4/29/2014 2014
 St. Louis, MO 
 1,254
 3,354
 (3,409) 1,199
 
 3/28/2014 1988
 Waukesha, WI (g)
 3,408
 12,918
 
 16,326
 1,075
 9/29/2014 2007
Ventura Place:                
 Albuquerque, NM (g)
 5,203
 7,998
 72
 13,273
 714
 4/29/2015 2008
Village at Hereford Farms:                
 Grovetown, GA 4,250
 1,222
 5,912
 
 7,134
 532
 9/26/2014 2009
Waite Park Center:                
 Waite Park, MN 10,441
 2,576
 15,484
 
 18,060
 451
 12/29/2016 1992

S-22

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

         ��        
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Wal-Mart:                
 Anderson, SC (g)
 $2,424
 $9,719
 $
 $12,143
 $519
 11/5/2015 2015
 Florence, SC (g)
 2,013
 9,225
 
 11,238
 490
 11/5/2015 2015
 Perry, GA $7,095
 2,270
 11,053
 
 13,323
 1,424
 6/4/2013 1999
 Summerville, SC 4,300
 2,410
 2,098
 
 4,508
 134
 9/18/2015 2015
 Tallahassee, FL 8,157
 14,823
 
 
 14,823
 
 12/11/2012 2008
 York, SC (g)
 1,913
 11,410
 
 13,323
 1,460
 6/4/2013 1998
Walgreens:                
 Andover, KS (g)
 630
 3,057
 
 3,687
 379
 10/18/2013 2001
 Arkadelphia, AR 4,225
 787
 4,626
 
 5,413
 366
 11/26/2014 2007
 Austintown, OH (g)
 637
 4,173
 
 4,810
 462
 8/19/2013 2002
 Bartlett, TN 4,150
 1,086
 4,321
 
 5,407
 358
 11/26/2014 1997
 Bartlett, TN 4,150
 799
 4,608
 
 5,407
 381
 11/26/2014 2002
 Birmingham, AL (g)
 985
 4,938
 
 5,923
 592
 4/9/2013 2012
 Birmingham, AL 4,300
 738
 4,844
 
 5,582
 400
 11/26/2014 2000
 Blair, NE 2,466
 335
 3,544
 
 3,879
 513
 4/18/2012 2008
 Chicopee, MA 3,894
 2,094
 4,945
 
 7,039
 399
 10/23/2014 2008
 Colerain Township, OH 4,200
 1,991
 3,470
 
 5,461
 280
 11/26/2014 1998
 Connelly Springs, NC (g)
 1,349
 3,628
 
 4,977
 411
 8/27/2013 2012
 Cullman, AL 3,542
 1,292
 3,779
 
 5,071
 475
 2/22/2013 2012
 Danville, VA (g)
 989
 4,547
 
 5,536
 614
 12/24/2012 2012
 Dearborn Heights, MI (g)
 2,236
 3,411
 
 5,647
 393
 7/9/2013 2008
 Decatur, AL 3,625
 631
 4,161
 
 4,792
 344
 11/26/2014 2004
 Dyersburg, TN (g)
 555
 4,088
 
 4,643
 374
 6/30/2014 2011
 East Chicago, IN (g)
 331
 5,242
 
 5,573
 444
 8/8/2014 2005
 Enterprise, AL 3,575
 839
 3,844
 
 4,683
 320
 11/26/2014 2004
 Evansville, IN 4,040
 812
 4,439
 
 5,251
 369
 11/26/2014 2001
 Florence, KY 4,125
 1,086
 4,206
 
 5,292
 338
 11/26/2014 2005
 Forrest City, AR 4,825
 643
 5,287
 
 5,930
 437
 11/26/2014 2007
 Fort Madison, IA (g)
 514
 3,723
 
 4,237
 412
 9/20/2013 2008
 Franklin, TN 4,200
 1,457
 4,075
 
 5,532
 339
 11/26/2014 2000
 Fraser, MI (g)
 518
 4,525
 
 5,043
 427
 5/19/2014 2004
 Hickory, NC (g)
 1,100
 4,241
 
 5,341
 537
 2/28/2013 2009
 Hobart, IN 3,875
 594
 4,526
 
 5,120
 373
 11/26/2014 1998
 Huntsville, AL 3,273
 1,931
 2,457
 
 4,388
 326
 3/15/2013 2001
 Kannapolis, NC 3,966
 1,480
 5,031
 
 6,511
 588
 6/12/2013 2012
 Knoxville, TN 3,725
 1,139
 3,750
 
 4,889
 311
 11/26/2014 1997
 Las Vegas, NV (g)
 2,325
 3,262
 70
 5,657
 367
 9/26/2013 1999
 Lawton, OK (g)
 860
 2,539
 
 3,399
 294
 7/3/2013 1998
 Little Rock, AR (g)
 548
 4,676
 
 5,224
 415
 6/30/2014 2011
 Little Rock, AR 4,100
 1,115
 4,248
 
 5,363
 352
 11/26/2014 2001
 Lubbock, TX (g)
 565
 3,257
 
 3,822
 433
 10/11/2012 2000
 Lubbock, TX (g)
 531
 2,951
 
 3,482
 389
 10/11/2012 1998
 Malvern, AR 4,165
 1,007
 4,325
 
 5,332
 342
 11/26/2014 2006
 Memphis, TN 3,775
 776
 4,166
 
 4,942
 345
 11/26/2014 1999

S-23

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Walgreens (continued):                
 Metropolis, IL (g)
 $284
 $4,991
 $
 $5,275
 $423
 8/8/2014 2009
 Michigan City, IN $3,200
 567
 3,615
 
 4,182
 304
 11/26/2014 1999
 Mobile, AL (g)
 1,603
 3,161
 
 4,764
 342
 11/7/2013 2013
 Mount Washington, KY 4,125
 545
 4,825
 
 5,370
 398
 11/26/2014 2005
 Oakland, TN 3,750
 689
 4,226
 
 4,915
 348
 11/26/2014 2005
 Oklahoma City, OK 3,950
 1,356
 3,869
 
 5,225
 328
 11/26/2014 1996
 Olathe, KS 4,230
 1,266
 4,047
 
 5,313
 334
 11/26/2014 1997
 Phoenix, AZ (g)
 2,216
 1,830
 
 4,046
 236
 3/22/2013 2001
 Pine Bluff, AR (g)
 248
 5,229
 
 5,477
 578
 9/17/2013 2012
 Ralston, NE 4,265
 967
 4,620
 
 5,587
 381
 11/26/2014 1999
 River Falls, WI 5,200
 634
 5,137
 
 5,771
 420
 11/26/2014 2007
 Sacramento, CA (g)
 324
 2,669
 
 2,993
 248
 6/30/2014 2008
 Sioux Falls, SD 3,625
 1,138
 3,784
 
 4,922
 315
 11/26/2014 2007
 Springdale, AR (g)
 1,172
 4,509
 
 5,681
 484
 10/7/2013 2012
 Springfield, IL (g)
 830
 3,619
 
 4,449
 524
 5/14/2012 2007
 St. Charles, MO 4,600
 1,644
 4,364
 
 6,008
 362
 11/26/2014 1994
 St. Louis, MO 4,600
 1,432
 4,556
 
 5,988
 378
 11/26/2014 1999
 St. Louis, MO 4,790
 1,414
 4,622
 
 6,036
 382
 11/26/2014 1999
 Suffolk, VA (g)
 1,261
 3,461
 
 4,722
 526
 5/14/2012 2007
 Sun City, AZ (g)
 837
 2,484
 
 3,321
 242
 5/6/2014 2000
 Tarboro, NC (g)
 755
 3,634
 
 4,389
 314
 8/22/2014 2014
 Toledo, OH 4,325
 1,993
 3,445
 
 5,438
 290
 11/26/2014 2001
 Troy, OH (g)
 547
 4,076
 
 4,623
 354
 7/28/2014 2002
 Tulsa, OK 3,350
 1,078
 3,453
 
 4,531
 288
 11/26/2014 1993
Walgreens/KeyBank:                
 Newburgh, NY 5,000
 3,280
 5,441
 
 8,721
 584
 9/16/2013 2010
Wallace Commons:                
 Salisbury, NC 7,590
 3,265
 8,058
 
 11,323
 1,070
 12/21/2012 2009
Wallace Commons II:                
 Salisbury, NC 6,012
 2,231
 8,479
 
 10,710
 924
 2/28/2014 2013
Warrenton Highlands:                
 Warrenton, OR (g)
 2,139
 5,774
 138
 8,051
 885
 5/29/2013 2011
Waterford South Park:                
 Clarksville, IN 7,200
 2,946
 8,564
 45
 11,555
 1,300
 4/12/2013 2006
Wawa:                
 Cape May, NJ (g)
 1,576
 5,790
 
 7,366
 805
 8/29/2012 2005
 Galloway, NJ (g)
 1,724
 6,105
 
 7,829
 847
 8/29/2012 2005
Wendy's:                
 Grafton, VA (g)
 539
 894
 
 1,433
 83
 6/27/2014 1985
 Westminster, CO (g)
 596
 1,108
 
 1,704
 102
 6/27/2014 1986
West Marine:                
 Panama City, FL (g)
 676
 2,219
 
 2,895
 189
 4/24/2015 2014
 Pensacola, FL (g)
 1,107
 3,398
 
 4,505
 291
 2/27/2015 2015
Western Refining, Inc:                
 Benson, AZ 566
 186
 510
 
 696
 37
 1/16/2015 1990
 Bisbee, AZ 399
 89
 137
 
 226
 22
 1/16/2015 1970

S-24

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

                  
     Initial Costs to Company   Gross Amount at      
       Buildings, Total Which Carried Accumulated    
       Fixtures and Adjustment At December 31, 2017 Depreciation Date Date
 Description (a) Encumbrances Land Improvements to Basis (b) (c) (d) (d) (e) (f) Acquired Constructed
Western Refining, Inc (continued):                
 Coolidge, AZ $472
 $578
 $283
 $
 $861
 $38
 1/16/2015 1997
 Douglas, AZ 913
 136
 1,080
 
 1,216
 80
 1/16/2015 1985
 Douglas, AZ 718
 89
 385
 
 474
 40
 1/16/2015 1997
 Florence, AZ 446
 363
 338
 
 701
 32
 1/16/2015 1999
 Globe, AZ 1,264
 572
 311
 
 883
 44
 1/16/2015 1994
 Hereford, AZ 1,531
 303
 879
 
 1,182
 69
 1/16/2015 2013
 Marana, AZ 1,458
 389
 493
 
 882
 41
 1/16/2015 2008
 Pearce, AZ 750
 116
 380
 
 496
 36
 1/16/2015 1985
 Pima, AZ 1,196
 372
 362
 
 734
 39
 1/16/2015 1994
 Safford, AZ 1,054
 77
 281
 
 358
 20
 1/16/2015 1989
 Safford, AZ 1,169
 204
 299
 
 503
 28
 1/16/2015 1996
 Safford, AZ 1,280
 107
 408
 
 515
 30
 1/16/2015 1989
 Sierra Vista, AZ 488
 87
 723
 
 810
 60
 1/16/2015 1977
 Thatcher, AZ 1,180
 140
 561
 
 701
 47
 1/16/2015 2004
 Tucson, AZ 524
 569
 453
 
 1,022
 40
 1/16/2015 1997
 Tucson, AZ 603
 473
 388
 
 861
 45
 1/16/2015 1995
 Tucson, AZ 582
 263
 170
 
 433
 19
 1/16/2015 1986
 Tucson, AZ 666
 770
 332
 
 1,102
 31
 1/16/2015 2002
 Tucson, AZ 571
 333
 167
 
 500
 12
 1/16/2015 1982
 Tucson, AZ 1,190
 397
 542
 
 939
 46
 1/16/2015 1986
 Tucson, AZ 523
 525
 606
 
 1,131
 52
 1/16/2015 2002
 Winkelman, AZ 953
 287
 403
 
 690
 37
 1/16/2015 1999
Westover Market:                
 San Antonio, TX 6,200
 2,705
 7,959
 
 10,664
 1,073
 7/10/2013 2013
Whole Foods Center:                
 Fort Collins, CO 12,500
 2,664
 17,166
 
 19,830
 1,607
 9/30/2014 2004
Winn-Dixie:                
 Baton Rouge, LA (g)
 1,782
 3,776
 
 5,558
 345
 6/27/2014 2000
 Walker, LA 
 900
 3,909
 
 4,809
 355
 6/27/2014 1999
Woods Supermarket:                
 Sunrise Beach, MO (g)
 1,044
 5,005
 
 6,049
 553
 9/13/2013 2013
   $1,237,877
 $1,195,250
 $3,279,455
 $89,887
 $4,564,592
 $334,476
    


S-25

Table of Contents
COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION – (Continued)
(in thousands)

(a) AsInitial costs exclude subsequent impairment charges.
(b)Consists of December 31, 2017, the Company owned 831 retail properties, 74 anchored shopping centerscapital expenditures and four industrialreal estate development costs, and distribution properties.impairment charges.
(b) (c)The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes was $5.2$3.7 billion.
(c) (d)The following is a reconciliation of total real estate carrying value for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
202020192018
Balance, beginning of period$2,530,311 $4,444,041 $4,564,592 
Additions
Acquisitions738,172 5,305 11,151 
Improvements192,591 13,832 6,135 
Assets placed back into service200,758 
Total additions$1,131,521 $19,137 $17,286 
Less: Deductions
Cost of real estate sold83,144 1,448,915 61,891 
Other (including provisions for impairment of real estate assets)206,762 483,952 75,946 
Total deductions289,906 1,932,867 137,837 
Balance, end of period$3,371,926 $2,530,311 $4,444,041 
  2017 2016 2015
Balance, beginning of period $4,370,629
 $4,185,605
 $3,590,939
Additions      
Acquisitions 261,660
 198,176
 532,454
Joint Venture Purchased 
 16,361
 
Improvements 13,708
 3,827
 64,458
Adjustment to basis 
 962
 
Total additions $275,368
 $219,326
 $596,912
Less: Deductions      
Cost of real estate sold 78,700
 27,144
 1,086
Adjustment to basis 
 51
 
Other (including provisions for impairment of real estate assets) 2,705
 7,107
 1,160
Total deductions 81,405
 34,302
 2,246
Balance, end of period $4,564,592
 $4,370,629
 $4,185,605
(d) (e)Gross intangible lease assets of $589.9$389.6 million and the associated accumulated amortization of $192.5$155.0 million are not reflected in the table above.
(e)
S-15

CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
(in thousands)
(f)The following is a reconciliation of accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
202020192018
Balance, beginning of period$243,122 $385,245 $334,476 
Additions
Acquisitions - Depreciation expense for building, acquisitions costs and tenant improvements acquired56,218 73,790 92,998 
Improvements - Depreciation expense for tenant improvements and building equipment2,280 2,352 2,481 
Total additions$58,498 $76,142 $95,479 
Deductions
Cost of real estate sold10,108 144,820 6,901 
Other (including provisions for impairment of real estate assets)(6,852)73,445 37,809 
Total deductions3,256 218,265 44,710 
Balance, end of period$298,364 $243,122 $385,245 
  2017 2016 2015
Balance, beginning of period $245,425
 $158,805
 $78,186
Additions      
Acquisitions - Depreciation expense for building, acquisitions costs and tenant improvements acquired 93,170
 88,202
 80,373
Improvements - Depreciation expense for tenant improvements and building equipment 1,679
 586
 303
Total additions $94,849
 $88,788
 $80,676
Deductions      
Cost of real estate sold 5,552
 1,514
 
Other (including provisions for impairment of real estate assets) 246
 654
 57
Total deductions 5,798
 2,168
 57
Balance, end of period $334,476
 $245,425
 $158,805
(f) (g)The Company’s assets are depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets by class. Generally, buildings are depreciated over 40 years, site improvements are amortized over 15 years and tenant improvements are amortized over the remaining life of the lease or the useful life, whichever is shorter.
(g) Property is included (h)Includes 56 anchored shopping centers.
S-16

Table of Contents
CIM REAL ESTATE FINANCE TRUST, INC.
SCHEDULE IV – MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
(in thousands)

Principal
Amount of
Loans Subject
FinalPeriodicFaceCarryingto Delinquent
InterestMaturityPaymentPriorAmount ofAmount ofPrincipal or
Loan TypeDescription / Location
Rate (a)
Date
Terms (b)
LiensMortgagesMortgages"Interest"
Mezzanine loanCondo / New York, New YorkL + 14.85%5/9/2021P/IN/A$34,904 $35,888 $
Mezzanine loanCondo / New York, New YorkL + 14.85%5/9/2021P/IN/A22,480 23,218 
Mezzanine loanCondo / New York, New YorkL + 14.85%5/9/2021P/IN/A13,906 14,350 
Mezzanine loanCondo / New York, New YorkL + 14.85%5/9/2021P/IN/A9,131 9,624 
Mezzanine loanCondo / New York, New YorkL + 8.00%5/9/2021P/IN/A22,104 22,373 
Mezzanine loanCondo / New York, New YorkL + 8.00%5/9/2021P/IN/A16,681 16,880 
Mezzanine loanCondo / New York, New YorkL + 8.00%5/9/2021P/IN/A10,034 10,153 
Mezzanine loanCondo / New York, New YorkL + 8.00%5/9/2021P/IN/A7,549 7,639 
Senior loanOffice / Duluth, GeorgiaL + 3.15%2/1/2025P/IN/A46,935 46,486 
Senior loanMultifamily / Atlanta, GeorgiaL + 2.75%1/9/2024P/IN/A69,500 69,238 
Senior loanOffice / Dallas, TexasL + 4.50%9/8/2023P/IN/A155,899 154,168 
Senior loanOffice / Orlando, FloridaL + 4.00%10/9/2023P/IN/A72,315 71,653 
Total loans$481,438 $481,670 $
Cure payments receivable (c)
— 7,351 — 
Allowance for credit losses (b)
— (60,628)— 
Total loans, net$481,438 $428,393 $

(a)L = one month LIBOR rate.
(b)P/I = principal and interest.
(c)Represents operating expenses related to the Credit Facility’s borrowing base. mezzanine loans paid by the Company on the borrower’s behalf in connection with the foreclosure proceedings that commenced during the year ended December 31, 2020.
(d)As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company had $1.25 billion outstanding underCompany’s allowance for credit losses related to its loans held-for-investment totaled $70.4 million, $60.6 million of which was related to the Credit Facility.CRE loans.

The following table reconciles mortgage loans on real estate for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):


Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Balance, beginning of period$298,880 $89,762 $
Additions during period:
New loans231,212 217,014 89,295 
Capitalized interest539 8,546 384 
Accretion of fees and other items1,909 2,441 268 
Total additions$233,660 $228,001 $89,947 
Less: Deductions during period:
Collections of principal(47,670)(17,186)
Deferred fees and other items(3,200)(1,697)(185)
Total deductions(50,870)(18,883)(185)
Balance, end of period$481,670 $298,880 $89,762 
Cure payments receivable7,351 
Allowance for credit losses(60,628)
Net balance, end of period$428,393 $298,880 $89,762 
S-26
S-17